id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA5600 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial conditionand results of operations d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 1 1 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s secured debt decreased from $ 30.8 million in 2001 to $ 22.9 million in 2002 as the company paid off $ 13.5 million of secured debt throughout 2002 and experienced lower borrowings on its secured line of credit during 2002 compared to 2001 . additionally , the company paid off approximately $ 128.5 million of secured debt throughout 2001 . 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s $ 500 million unsecured line of credit decreased by approximately $ 1.1 million in 2002 compared to 2001 as the company maintained lower balances on the line throughout most of 2002 . as a result of the above-mentioned items , earnings from rental operations decreased $ 35.0 million from $ 254.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 219.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . service operations service operations primarily consist of leasing , management , construction and development services for joint venture properties and properties owned by third parties . service operations revenues decreased from $ 80.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 68.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the prolonged effect of the slow economy has been the primary factor in the overall decrease in revenues . the company experienced a decrease of $ 12.7 million in net general contractor revenues because of a decrease in the volume of construction in 2002 , compared to 2001 , as well as slightly lower profit margins . property management , maintenance and leasing fee revenues decreased from $ 22.8 million in 2001 to $ 14.3 million in 2002 primarily because of a decrease in landscaping maintenance revenue resulting from the sale of the landscaping operations in the third quarter of 2001 . construction management and development activity income represents construction and development fees earned on projects where the company acts as the construction manager along with profits from the company 2019s held for sale program whereby the company develops a property for sale upon completion . the increase in revenues of $ 10.3 million in 2002 is primarily due to an increase in volume of the sale of properties from the held for sale program . service operations expenses decreased from $ 45.3 million in 2001 to $ 38.3 million in 2002 . the decrease is attributable to the decrease in construction and development activity and the reduced overhead costs as a result of the sale of the landscape business in 2001 . as a result of the above , earnings from service operations decreased from $ 35.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 30.3 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . general and administrative expense general and administrative expense increased from $ 15.6 million in 2001 to $ 25.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the company has been successful reducing total operating and administration costs ; however , reduced construction and development activities have resulted in a greater amount of overhead being charged to general and administrative expense instead of being capitalized into development projects or charged to service operations . other income and expenses gain on sale of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , is comprised of the following amounts in 2002 and 2001 : gain on sales of depreciable properties represent sales of previously held for investment rental properties . beginning in 2000 and continuing into 2001 , the company pursued favorable opportunities to dispose of real estate assets that no longer met long-term investment objectives . in 2002 , the company significantly reduced this property sales program until the business climate improves and provides better investment opportunities for the sale proceeds . gain on land sales represents sales of undeveloped land owned by the company . the company pursues opportunities to dispose of land in markets with a high concentration of undeveloped land and those markets where the land no longer meets strategic development plans of the company . the company recorded a $ 9.4 million adjustment in 2002 associated with six properties determined to have an impairment of book value . the company has analyzed each of its in-service properties and has determined that there are no additional valuation adjustments that need to be made as of december 31 , 2002 . the company recorded an adjustment of $ 4.8 million in 2001 for one property that the company had contracted to sell for a price less than its book value . other revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , includes $ 1.4 million of gain related to an interest rate swap that did not qualify for hedge accounting. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gain on sales of depreciable properties</td><td>$ 4491</td><td>$ 45428</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gain on land sales</td><td>4478</td><td>5080</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impairment adjustment</td><td>-9379 ( 9379 )</td><td>-4800 ( 4800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ -410 ( 410 )</td><td>$ 45708</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net change in value of general and administrative expenses from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 9.8
Question: what is that change over the 2001 value?
| 0.62821 |
CONVFINQA5601 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .
Question: what was the difference between the booking holdings inc. of 2017 and 2012?
| 180.1 |
CONVFINQA5602 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .
Question: what was the difference between the booking holdings inc. of 2017 and 2012?
Answer: 180.1
Question: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the booking holdings inc. of 2012?
| 1.801 |
CONVFINQA5603 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .
Question: what was the difference between the booking holdings inc. of 2017 and 2012?
Answer: 180.1
Question: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the booking holdings inc. of 2012?
Answer: 1.801
Question: and what was the difference between the s&p 500 index of 2017 and 2012?
| 108.14 |
CONVFINQA5604 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .
Question: what was the difference between the booking holdings inc. of 2017 and 2012?
Answer: 180.1
Question: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the booking holdings inc. of 2012?
Answer: 1.801
Question: and what was the difference between the s&p 500 index of 2017 and 2012?
Answer: 108.14
Question: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the s&p 500 index of 2012?
| 1.0814 |
CONVFINQA5605 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .
Question: what was the difference between the booking holdings inc. of 2017 and 2012?
Answer: 180.1
Question: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the booking holdings inc. of 2012?
Answer: 1.801
Question: and what was the difference between the s&p 500 index of 2017 and 2012?
Answer: 108.14
Question: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the s&p 500 index of 2012?
Answer: 1.0814
Question: what is, then, the difference between the percentage difference in booking holdings inc and the one in s&p 500 index?
| 0.7196 |
CONVFINQA5606 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2012?
| 82.0 |
CONVFINQA5607 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2012?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2011?
| 107.0 |
CONVFINQA5608 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2012?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2011?
Answer: 107.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| -25.0 |
CONVFINQA5609 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2012?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2011?
Answer: 107.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: -25.0
Question: what is the 2011 value?
| 107.0 |
CONVFINQA5610 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2012?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2011?
Answer: 107.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: -25.0
Question: what is the 2011 value?
Answer: 107.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2011 value?
| -0.23364 |
CONVFINQA5611 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc. , ( the 201ccompany , 201d 201camerican water 201d or 201caww 201d ) is a delaware holding company . american water is the most geographically diversified , as well as the largest publicly-traded , united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . as a holding company , we conduct substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries . our approximately 6400 employees provide an estimated 15 million people with drinking water , wastewater and/or other water-related services in 47 states and one canadian province . operating segments we report our results of operations in two operating segments : the regulated businesses and the market- based operations . additional information with respect to our operating segment results is included in the section entitled 201citem 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d and note 18 of the consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . we report the results of this business in our regulated businesses segment . our subsidiaries that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation , hereafter referred to as public utility commissions , or 201cpucs , 201d of the states in which we operate . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . our regulated businesses segment operating revenues were $ 2674.3 million for 2014 , $ 2539.9 for 2013 , $ 2564.4 million for 2012 , accounting for 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) , 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) and 89.9% ( 89.9 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenues , number of customers and an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2014 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 652.3</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.5% ( 24.5 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 648066</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.2% ( 20.2 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.7% ( 22.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>605.4</td><td>22.6% ( 22.6 % )</td><td>666415</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>18.5% ( 18.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>270.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td><td>464498</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>262.3</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>312017</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>california</td><td>209.8</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>174198</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>indiana</td><td>200.6</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>293666</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>127.0</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>170371</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2327.6</td><td>87.0% ( 87.0 % )</td><td>2729231</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.1</td><td>84.9% ( 84.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>346.7</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>489961</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2674.3</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3219192</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.9</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois. .
Question: what is the number of the total estimated population served, times 1000000?
| 11900000.0 |
CONVFINQA5612 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc. , ( the 201ccompany , 201d 201camerican water 201d or 201caww 201d ) is a delaware holding company . american water is the most geographically diversified , as well as the largest publicly-traded , united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . as a holding company , we conduct substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries . our approximately 6400 employees provide an estimated 15 million people with drinking water , wastewater and/or other water-related services in 47 states and one canadian province . operating segments we report our results of operations in two operating segments : the regulated businesses and the market- based operations . additional information with respect to our operating segment results is included in the section entitled 201citem 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d and note 18 of the consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . we report the results of this business in our regulated businesses segment . our subsidiaries that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation , hereafter referred to as public utility commissions , or 201cpucs , 201d of the states in which we operate . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . our regulated businesses segment operating revenues were $ 2674.3 million for 2014 , $ 2539.9 for 2013 , $ 2564.4 million for 2012 , accounting for 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) , 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) and 89.9% ( 89.9 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenues , number of customers and an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2014 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 652.3</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.5% ( 24.5 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 648066</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.2% ( 20.2 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.7% ( 22.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>605.4</td><td>22.6% ( 22.6 % )</td><td>666415</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>18.5% ( 18.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>270.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td><td>464498</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>262.3</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>312017</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>california</td><td>209.8</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>174198</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>indiana</td><td>200.6</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>293666</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>127.0</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>170371</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2327.6</td><td>87.0% ( 87.0 % )</td><td>2729231</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.1</td><td>84.9% ( 84.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>346.7</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>489961</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2674.3</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3219192</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.9</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois. .
Question: what is the number of the total estimated population served, times 1000000?
Answer: 11900000.0
Question: what is the total business number of customers over total estimated population served?
| 0.27052 |
CONVFINQA5613 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?
| 20.8 |
CONVFINQA5614 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 20.8
Question: and the amount due to volume/weather?
| 4.5 |
CONVFINQA5615 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 20.8
Question: and the amount due to volume/weather?
Answer: 4.5
Question: so what percentage of the change was due to this aspect?
| 0.21635 |
CONVFINQA5616 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 78.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>3.2</td><td>8.8</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-4.9 ( 4.9 )</td><td>-1.0 ( 1.0 )</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations</td><td>-14.0 ( 14.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td><td>-1.6 ( 1.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>assumed in connection with acquisitions</td><td>10.0</td><td>-</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2.1</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 61.5</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the amount for settlements in 2017?
| 10.8 |
CONVFINQA5617 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 78.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>3.2</td><td>8.8</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-4.9 ( 4.9 )</td><td>-1.0 ( 1.0 )</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations</td><td>-14.0 ( 14.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td><td>-1.6 ( 1.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>assumed in connection with acquisitions</td><td>10.0</td><td>-</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2.1</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 61.5</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the amount for settlements in 2017?
Answer: 10.8
Question: what about the sum of settlements in 2016 and 2017?
| 8.8 |
CONVFINQA5618 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 78.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>3.2</td><td>8.8</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-4.9 ( 4.9 )</td><td>-1.0 ( 1.0 )</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations</td><td>-14.0 ( 14.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td><td>-1.6 ( 1.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>assumed in connection with acquisitions</td><td>10.0</td><td>-</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2.1</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 61.5</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the amount for settlements in 2017?
Answer: 10.8
Question: what about the sum of settlements in 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 8.8
Question: what is the impact in effective rate if total amount of unrecognized tax benefits is recognized in 2017?
| 47.1 |
CONVFINQA5619 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 78.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>3.2</td><td>8.8</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-4.9 ( 4.9 )</td><td>-1.0 ( 1.0 )</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations</td><td>-14.0 ( 14.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td><td>-1.6 ( 1.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>assumed in connection with acquisitions</td><td>10.0</td><td>-</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2.1</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 61.5</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the amount for settlements in 2017?
Answer: 10.8
Question: what about the sum of settlements in 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 8.8
Question: what is the impact in effective rate if total amount of unrecognized tax benefits is recognized in 2017?
Answer: 47.1
Question: what is the total gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits in 2017?
| 61.5 |
CONVFINQA5620 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 78.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>3.2</td><td>8.8</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-4.9 ( 4.9 )</td><td>-1.0 ( 1.0 )</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations</td><td>-14.0 ( 14.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td><td>-1.6 ( 1.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>assumed in connection with acquisitions</td><td>10.0</td><td>-</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2.1</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 61.5</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the amount for settlements in 2017?
Answer: 10.8
Question: what about the sum of settlements in 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 8.8
Question: what is the impact in effective rate if total amount of unrecognized tax benefits is recognized in 2017?
Answer: 47.1
Question: what is the total gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits in 2017?
Answer: 61.5
Question: what proportion does this represent?
| 0.76585 |
CONVFINQA5621 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net revenues from 2010 to 2011?
| -25.9 |
CONVFINQA5622 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net revenues from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -25.9
Question: what was the value in 2010?
| 272.9 |
CONVFINQA5623 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net revenues from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -25.9
Question: what was the value in 2010?
Answer: 272.9
Question: what was the percent change?
| -0.09491 |
CONVFINQA5624 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our initial estimate of fraud losses , fines and other charges on our understanding of the rules and operating regulations published by the networks and preliminary communications with the networks . we have now reached resolution with and made payments to the networks , resulting in charges that were less than our initial estimates . the primary difference between our initial estimates and the final charges relates to lower fraud related costs attributed to this event than previously expected . the following table reflects the activity in our accrual for fraud losses , fines and other charges for the twelve months ended may 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at may 31 2012</td><td>$ 67436</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments</td><td>-31781 ( 31781 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>subtotal</td><td>35655</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments</td><td>-35655 ( 35655 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at may 31 2013</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> we were insured under policies that provided coverage of certain costs associated with this event . the policies provided a total of $ 30.0 million in policy limits and contained various sub-limits of liability and other terms , conditions and limitations , including a $ 1.0 million deductible per claim . as of fiscal year 2013 , we received assessments from certain networks and submitted additional claims to the insurers and recorded $ 20.0 million in additional insurance recoveries based on our negotiations with our insurers . we will record receivables for any additional recoveries in the periods in which we determine such recovery is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated . a class action arising out of the processing system intrusion was filed against us on april 4 , 2012 by natalie willingham ( individually and on behalf of a putative nationwide class ) ( the 201cplaintiff 201d ) . specifically , ms . willingham alleged that we failed to maintain reasonable and adequate procedures to protect her personally identifiable information ( 201cpii 201d ) which she claims resulted in two fraudulent charges on her credit card in march 2012 . further , ms . willingham asserted that we failed to timely notify the public of the data breach . based on these allegations , ms . willingham asserted claims for negligence , violation of the federal stored communications act , willful violation of the fair credit reporting act , negligent violation of the fair credit reporting act , violation of georgia 2019s unfair and deceptive trade practices act , negligence per se , breach of third-party beneficiary contract , and breach of implied contract . ms . willingham sought an unspecified amount of damages and injunctive relief . the lawsuit was filed in the united states district court for the northern district of georgia . on may 14 , 2012 , we filed a motion to dismiss . on july 11 , 2012 , plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend her complaint , and on july 16 , 2012 , the court granted that motion . she then filed an amended complaint on july 16 , 2012 . the amended complaint did not add any new causes of action . instead , it added two new named plaintiffs ( nadine and robert hielscher ) ( together with plaintiff , the 201cplaintiffs 201d ) and dropped plaintiff 2019s claim for negligence per se . on august 16 , 2012 , we filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs 2019 amended complaint . the plaintiffs filed their response in opposition to our motion to dismiss on october 5 , 2012 , and we subsequently filed our reply brief on october 22 , 2012 . the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation recommending dismissal of all of plaintiffs 2019 claims with prejudice . the plaintiffs subsequently agreed to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice , with each party bearing its own fees and costs . this was the only consideration exchanged by the parties in connection with plaintiffs 2019 voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the lawsuit . the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice on march 6 , 2013 . note 3 2014settlement processing assets and obligations we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa . these designations are dependent upon member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsoring us and our adherence to the standards of the networks . we have primary financial institution sponsors in the various markets where we facilitate payment transactions with whom we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements . these agreements allow us to route transactions under the member banks 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa . in certain markets , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship. .
Question: what percentage of the balance was used on payments?
| 0.52872 |
CONVFINQA5625 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our initial estimate of fraud losses , fines and other charges on our understanding of the rules and operating regulations published by the networks and preliminary communications with the networks . we have now reached resolution with and made payments to the networks , resulting in charges that were less than our initial estimates . the primary difference between our initial estimates and the final charges relates to lower fraud related costs attributed to this event than previously expected . the following table reflects the activity in our accrual for fraud losses , fines and other charges for the twelve months ended may 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at may 31 2012</td><td>$ 67436</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments</td><td>-31781 ( 31781 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>subtotal</td><td>35655</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments</td><td>-35655 ( 35655 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at may 31 2013</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> we were insured under policies that provided coverage of certain costs associated with this event . the policies provided a total of $ 30.0 million in policy limits and contained various sub-limits of liability and other terms , conditions and limitations , including a $ 1.0 million deductible per claim . as of fiscal year 2013 , we received assessments from certain networks and submitted additional claims to the insurers and recorded $ 20.0 million in additional insurance recoveries based on our negotiations with our insurers . we will record receivables for any additional recoveries in the periods in which we determine such recovery is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated . a class action arising out of the processing system intrusion was filed against us on april 4 , 2012 by natalie willingham ( individually and on behalf of a putative nationwide class ) ( the 201cplaintiff 201d ) . specifically , ms . willingham alleged that we failed to maintain reasonable and adequate procedures to protect her personally identifiable information ( 201cpii 201d ) which she claims resulted in two fraudulent charges on her credit card in march 2012 . further , ms . willingham asserted that we failed to timely notify the public of the data breach . based on these allegations , ms . willingham asserted claims for negligence , violation of the federal stored communications act , willful violation of the fair credit reporting act , negligent violation of the fair credit reporting act , violation of georgia 2019s unfair and deceptive trade practices act , negligence per se , breach of third-party beneficiary contract , and breach of implied contract . ms . willingham sought an unspecified amount of damages and injunctive relief . the lawsuit was filed in the united states district court for the northern district of georgia . on may 14 , 2012 , we filed a motion to dismiss . on july 11 , 2012 , plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend her complaint , and on july 16 , 2012 , the court granted that motion . she then filed an amended complaint on july 16 , 2012 . the amended complaint did not add any new causes of action . instead , it added two new named plaintiffs ( nadine and robert hielscher ) ( together with plaintiff , the 201cplaintiffs 201d ) and dropped plaintiff 2019s claim for negligence per se . on august 16 , 2012 , we filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs 2019 amended complaint . the plaintiffs filed their response in opposition to our motion to dismiss on october 5 , 2012 , and we subsequently filed our reply brief on october 22 , 2012 . the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation recommending dismissal of all of plaintiffs 2019 claims with prejudice . the plaintiffs subsequently agreed to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice , with each party bearing its own fees and costs . this was the only consideration exchanged by the parties in connection with plaintiffs 2019 voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the lawsuit . the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice on march 6 , 2013 . note 3 2014settlement processing assets and obligations we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa . these designations are dependent upon member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsoring us and our adherence to the standards of the networks . we have primary financial institution sponsors in the various markets where we facilitate payment transactions with whom we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements . these agreements allow us to route transactions under the member banks 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa . in certain markets , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship. .
Question: what percentage of the balance was used on payments?
Answer: 0.52872
Question: what percentage of the beginning balance of accrual for fraud losses is regulated through adjustments?
| 0.47128 |
CONVFINQA5626 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what was the change in the total of performance shares outstanding during 2011?
| 218602.0 |
CONVFINQA5627 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what was the change in the total of performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: and what was that total in the beginning of the year?
| 556186.0 |
CONVFINQA5628 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what was the change in the total of performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: and what was that total in the beginning of the year?
Answer: 556186.0
Question: and how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this total, in percentage?
| 0.39304 |
CONVFINQA5629 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis imprudence by the utility operating companies in their execution of their obligations under the system agreement . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussions of this litigation . in november 2012 the utility operating companies filed amendments to the system agreement with the ferc pursuant to section 205 of the federal power act . the amendments consist primarily of the technical revisions needed to the system agreement to ( i ) allocate certain charges and credits from the miso settlement statements to the participating utility operating companies ; and ( ii ) address entergy arkansas 2019s withdrawal from the system agreement . the lpsc , mpsc , puct , and city council filed protests at the ferc regarding the amendments and other aspects of the utility operating companies 2019 future operating arrangements , including requests that the continued viability of the system agreement in miso ( among other issues ) be set for hearing by the ferc . in december 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the revisions filed in november 2012 , subject to a further compliance filing and other conditions . entergy services made the requisite compliance filing in february 2014 and the ferc accepted the compliance filing in november 2015 . in the november 2015 order , the ferc required entergy services to file a refund report consisting of the results of the intra-system bill rerun from december 19 , 2013 through november 30 , 2015 calculating the use of an energy-based allocator to allocate losses , ancillary services charges and credits , and uplift charges and credits to load of each participating utility operating company . the filing shows the following payments and receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>( $ 6.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>$ 4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>$ 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>$ 1.9</td></tr></table> in the december 2013 order , the ferc set one issue for hearing involving a settlement with union pacific regarding certain coal delivery issues . consistent with the decisions described above , entergy arkansas 2019s participation in the system agreement terminated effective december 18 , 2013 . in december 2014 a ferc alj issued an initial decision finding that entergy arkansas would realize benefits after december 18 , 2013 from the 2008 settlement agreement between entergy services , entergy arkansas , and union pacific , related to certain coal delivery issues . the alj further found that all of the utility operating companies should share in those benefits pursuant to the methodology proposed by the mpsc . the utility operating companies and other parties to the proceeding have filed briefs on exceptions and/or briefs opposing exceptions with the ferc challenging various aspects of the december 2014 initial decision and the matter is pending before the ferc . utility operating company notices of termination of system agreement participation consistent with their written notices of termination delivered in december 2005 and november 2007 , respectively , entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi filed with the ferc in february 2009 their notices of cancellation to terminate their participation in the system agreement , effective december 18 , 2013 and november 7 , 2015 , respectively . in november 2009 the ferc accepted the notices of cancellation and determined that entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi are permitted to withdraw from the system agreement following the 96-month notice period without payment of a fee or the requirement to otherwise compensate the remaining utility operating companies as a result of withdrawal . appeals by the lpsc and the city council were denied in 2012 and 2013 . effective december 18 , 2013 , entergy arkansas ceased participating in the system agreement . effective november 7 , 2015 , entergy mississippi ceased participating in the system agreement . in keeping with their prior commitments and after a careful evaluation of the basis for and continued reasonableness of the 96-month system agreement termination notice period , the utility operating companies filed with the ferc in october 2013 to amend the system agreement changing the notice period for an operating company to .
Question: what was the total of payments for entergy new orleans?
| 0.4 |
CONVFINQA5630 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis imprudence by the utility operating companies in their execution of their obligations under the system agreement . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussions of this litigation . in november 2012 the utility operating companies filed amendments to the system agreement with the ferc pursuant to section 205 of the federal power act . the amendments consist primarily of the technical revisions needed to the system agreement to ( i ) allocate certain charges and credits from the miso settlement statements to the participating utility operating companies ; and ( ii ) address entergy arkansas 2019s withdrawal from the system agreement . the lpsc , mpsc , puct , and city council filed protests at the ferc regarding the amendments and other aspects of the utility operating companies 2019 future operating arrangements , including requests that the continued viability of the system agreement in miso ( among other issues ) be set for hearing by the ferc . in december 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the revisions filed in november 2012 , subject to a further compliance filing and other conditions . entergy services made the requisite compliance filing in february 2014 and the ferc accepted the compliance filing in november 2015 . in the november 2015 order , the ferc required entergy services to file a refund report consisting of the results of the intra-system bill rerun from december 19 , 2013 through november 30 , 2015 calculating the use of an energy-based allocator to allocate losses , ancillary services charges and credits , and uplift charges and credits to load of each participating utility operating company . the filing shows the following payments and receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>( $ 6.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>$ 4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>$ 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>$ 1.9</td></tr></table> in the december 2013 order , the ferc set one issue for hearing involving a settlement with union pacific regarding certain coal delivery issues . consistent with the decisions described above , entergy arkansas 2019s participation in the system agreement terminated effective december 18 , 2013 . in december 2014 a ferc alj issued an initial decision finding that entergy arkansas would realize benefits after december 18 , 2013 from the 2008 settlement agreement between entergy services , entergy arkansas , and union pacific , related to certain coal delivery issues . the alj further found that all of the utility operating companies should share in those benefits pursuant to the methodology proposed by the mpsc . the utility operating companies and other parties to the proceeding have filed briefs on exceptions and/or briefs opposing exceptions with the ferc challenging various aspects of the december 2014 initial decision and the matter is pending before the ferc . utility operating company notices of termination of system agreement participation consistent with their written notices of termination delivered in december 2005 and november 2007 , respectively , entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi filed with the ferc in february 2009 their notices of cancellation to terminate their participation in the system agreement , effective december 18 , 2013 and november 7 , 2015 , respectively . in november 2009 the ferc accepted the notices of cancellation and determined that entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi are permitted to withdraw from the system agreement following the 96-month notice period without payment of a fee or the requirement to otherwise compensate the remaining utility operating companies as a result of withdrawal . appeals by the lpsc and the city council were denied in 2012 and 2013 . effective december 18 , 2013 , entergy arkansas ceased participating in the system agreement . effective november 7 , 2015 , entergy mississippi ceased participating in the system agreement . in keeping with their prior commitments and after a careful evaluation of the basis for and continued reasonableness of the 96-month system agreement termination notice period , the utility operating companies filed with the ferc in october 2013 to amend the system agreement changing the notice period for an operating company to .
Question: what was the total of payments for entergy new orleans?
Answer: 0.4
Question: and what was that for entergy texas?
| 1.9 |
CONVFINQA5631 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis imprudence by the utility operating companies in their execution of their obligations under the system agreement . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussions of this litigation . in november 2012 the utility operating companies filed amendments to the system agreement with the ferc pursuant to section 205 of the federal power act . the amendments consist primarily of the technical revisions needed to the system agreement to ( i ) allocate certain charges and credits from the miso settlement statements to the participating utility operating companies ; and ( ii ) address entergy arkansas 2019s withdrawal from the system agreement . the lpsc , mpsc , puct , and city council filed protests at the ferc regarding the amendments and other aspects of the utility operating companies 2019 future operating arrangements , including requests that the continued viability of the system agreement in miso ( among other issues ) be set for hearing by the ferc . in december 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the revisions filed in november 2012 , subject to a further compliance filing and other conditions . entergy services made the requisite compliance filing in february 2014 and the ferc accepted the compliance filing in november 2015 . in the november 2015 order , the ferc required entergy services to file a refund report consisting of the results of the intra-system bill rerun from december 19 , 2013 through november 30 , 2015 calculating the use of an energy-based allocator to allocate losses , ancillary services charges and credits , and uplift charges and credits to load of each participating utility operating company . the filing shows the following payments and receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>( $ 6.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>$ 4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>$ 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>$ 1.9</td></tr></table> in the december 2013 order , the ferc set one issue for hearing involving a settlement with union pacific regarding certain coal delivery issues . consistent with the decisions described above , entergy arkansas 2019s participation in the system agreement terminated effective december 18 , 2013 . in december 2014 a ferc alj issued an initial decision finding that entergy arkansas would realize benefits after december 18 , 2013 from the 2008 settlement agreement between entergy services , entergy arkansas , and union pacific , related to certain coal delivery issues . the alj further found that all of the utility operating companies should share in those benefits pursuant to the methodology proposed by the mpsc . the utility operating companies and other parties to the proceeding have filed briefs on exceptions and/or briefs opposing exceptions with the ferc challenging various aspects of the december 2014 initial decision and the matter is pending before the ferc . utility operating company notices of termination of system agreement participation consistent with their written notices of termination delivered in december 2005 and november 2007 , respectively , entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi filed with the ferc in february 2009 their notices of cancellation to terminate their participation in the system agreement , effective december 18 , 2013 and november 7 , 2015 , respectively . in november 2009 the ferc accepted the notices of cancellation and determined that entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi are permitted to withdraw from the system agreement following the 96-month notice period without payment of a fee or the requirement to otherwise compensate the remaining utility operating companies as a result of withdrawal . appeals by the lpsc and the city council were denied in 2012 and 2013 . effective december 18 , 2013 , entergy arkansas ceased participating in the system agreement . effective november 7 , 2015 , entergy mississippi ceased participating in the system agreement . in keeping with their prior commitments and after a careful evaluation of the basis for and continued reasonableness of the 96-month system agreement termination notice period , the utility operating companies filed with the ferc in october 2013 to amend the system agreement changing the notice period for an operating company to .
Question: what was the total of payments for entergy new orleans?
Answer: 0.4
Question: and what was that for entergy texas?
Answer: 1.9
Question: how much, then, did the new orleans amount represent in relation to the texas one?
| 0.21053 |
CONVFINQA5632 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis imprudence by the utility operating companies in their execution of their obligations under the system agreement . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussions of this litigation . in november 2012 the utility operating companies filed amendments to the system agreement with the ferc pursuant to section 205 of the federal power act . the amendments consist primarily of the technical revisions needed to the system agreement to ( i ) allocate certain charges and credits from the miso settlement statements to the participating utility operating companies ; and ( ii ) address entergy arkansas 2019s withdrawal from the system agreement . the lpsc , mpsc , puct , and city council filed protests at the ferc regarding the amendments and other aspects of the utility operating companies 2019 future operating arrangements , including requests that the continued viability of the system agreement in miso ( among other issues ) be set for hearing by the ferc . in december 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the revisions filed in november 2012 , subject to a further compliance filing and other conditions . entergy services made the requisite compliance filing in february 2014 and the ferc accepted the compliance filing in november 2015 . in the november 2015 order , the ferc required entergy services to file a refund report consisting of the results of the intra-system bill rerun from december 19 , 2013 through november 30 , 2015 calculating the use of an energy-based allocator to allocate losses , ancillary services charges and credits , and uplift charges and credits to load of each participating utility operating company . the filing shows the following payments and receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>( $ 6.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>$ 4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>$ 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>$ 1.9</td></tr></table> in the december 2013 order , the ferc set one issue for hearing involving a settlement with union pacific regarding certain coal delivery issues . consistent with the decisions described above , entergy arkansas 2019s participation in the system agreement terminated effective december 18 , 2013 . in december 2014 a ferc alj issued an initial decision finding that entergy arkansas would realize benefits after december 18 , 2013 from the 2008 settlement agreement between entergy services , entergy arkansas , and union pacific , related to certain coal delivery issues . the alj further found that all of the utility operating companies should share in those benefits pursuant to the methodology proposed by the mpsc . the utility operating companies and other parties to the proceeding have filed briefs on exceptions and/or briefs opposing exceptions with the ferc challenging various aspects of the december 2014 initial decision and the matter is pending before the ferc . utility operating company notices of termination of system agreement participation consistent with their written notices of termination delivered in december 2005 and november 2007 , respectively , entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi filed with the ferc in february 2009 their notices of cancellation to terminate their participation in the system agreement , effective december 18 , 2013 and november 7 , 2015 , respectively . in november 2009 the ferc accepted the notices of cancellation and determined that entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi are permitted to withdraw from the system agreement following the 96-month notice period without payment of a fee or the requirement to otherwise compensate the remaining utility operating companies as a result of withdrawal . appeals by the lpsc and the city council were denied in 2012 and 2013 . effective december 18 , 2013 , entergy arkansas ceased participating in the system agreement . effective november 7 , 2015 , entergy mississippi ceased participating in the system agreement . in keeping with their prior commitments and after a careful evaluation of the basis for and continued reasonableness of the 96-month system agreement termination notice period , the utility operating companies filed with the ferc in october 2013 to amend the system agreement changing the notice period for an operating company to .
Question: what was the total of payments for entergy new orleans?
Answer: 0.4
Question: and what was that for entergy texas?
Answer: 1.9
Question: how much, then, did the new orleans amount represent in relation to the texas one?
Answer: 0.21053
Question: and how much did this same texas amount represent in relation to the payments for entergy mississippi?
| 0.475 |
CONVFINQA5633 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . from 2012 to 2017?
| 76.08 |
CONVFINQA5634 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for standard and poor's 500 index during the same period?
| 108.14 |
CONVFINQA5635 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for standard and poor's 500 index during the same period?
Answer: 108.14
Question: how much does the expeditors international of washington inc . change represent in relation to the the value of that stock in 2012, in percentage?
| 0.7608 |
CONVFINQA5636 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for standard and poor's 500 index during the same period?
Answer: 108.14
Question: how much does the expeditors international of washington inc . change represent in relation to the the value of that stock in 2012, in percentage?
Answer: 0.7608
Question: and how much does the standard and poor's 500 index change represent in relation to the the value of that stock in 2012, also in percentage?
| 1.0814 |
CONVFINQA5637 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for standard and poor's 500 index during the same period?
Answer: 108.14
Question: how much does the expeditors international of washington inc . change represent in relation to the the value of that stock in 2012, in percentage?
Answer: 0.7608
Question: and how much does the standard and poor's 500 index change represent in relation to the the value of that stock in 2012, also in percentage?
Answer: 1.0814
Question: what is the difference between this percentage representation for expeditors international of washington inc . and for standard and poor's 500 index?
| -0.3206 |
CONVFINQA5638 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .
Question: what was the change in value of the weighted average risk-free interest rate between 2007 and 2008?
| -2.44 |
CONVFINQA5639 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .
Question: what was the change in value of the weighted average risk-free interest rate between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: -2.44
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.48606 |
CONVFINQA5640 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: what was alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014?
| 3743.0 |
CONVFINQA5641 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: what was alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014?
Answer: 3743.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
| 3514.0 |
CONVFINQA5642 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: what was alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014?
Answer: 3743.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Answer: 3514.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2014 to 2015?
| 1.06517 |
CONVFINQA5643 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: what was alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014?
Answer: 3743.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Answer: 3514.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 1.06517
Question: what that less 1?
| 0.06517 |
CONVFINQA5644 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: what was alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in 2014?
Answer: 3743.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Answer: 3514.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 1.06517
Question: what that less 1?
Answer: 0.06517
Question: what is that shown as a percent?
| 6.51679 |
CONVFINQA5645 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2018 form 10-k | 31 business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.34</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>65.23</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>3.15</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 71.34 $ 54.12 $ 43.64 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 65.23 50.80 43.29 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 3.15 2.99 2.52 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel ( 2 ) eia cushing , ok wti ( west texas intermediate ) spot price ( 3 ) eia henry hub natural gas spot price per million british thermal unit 2018 demonstrated the volatility of the oil and gas market . through the first three quarters of 2018 , we experienced stability in the north american and international markets . however , in the fourth quarter of 2018 commodity prices dropped nearly 40% ( 40 % ) resulting in increased customer uncertainty . from an offshore standpoint , through most of 2018 , we saw multiple large offshore projects reach positive final investment decisions , and the lng market and outlook improved throughout 2018 , driven by increased demand globally . in 2018 , the first large north american lng positive final investment decision was reached . outside of north america , customer spending is highly driven by brent oil prices , which increased on average throughout the year . average brent oil prices increased to $ 71.34/bbl in 2018 from $ 54.12/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 50.57/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 86.07/bbl in october 2018 . for the first three quarters of 2018 , brent oil prices increased sequentially . however , in the fourth quarter , brent oil prices declined 39% ( 39 % ) versus the end of the third quarter , as a result of increased supply from the u.s. , worries of a global economic slowdown , and lower than expected production cuts . in north america , customer spending is highly driven by wti oil prices , which similar to brent oil prices , on average increased throughout the year . average wti oil prices increased to $ 65.23/bbl in 2018 from $ 50.80/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 44.48/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 77.41/bbl in june 2018 . in north america , natural gas prices , as measured by the henry hub natural gas spot price , averaged $ 3.15/ mmbtu in 2018 , representing a 6% ( 6 % ) increase over the prior year . throughout the year , henry hub natural gas spot prices ranged from a high of $ 6.24/mmbtu in january 2018 to a low of $ 2.49/mmbtu in february 2018 . according to the u.s . department of energy ( doe ) , working natural gas in storage at the end of 2018 was 2705 billion cubic feet ( bcf ) , which was 15.6% ( 15.6 % ) , or 421 bcf , below the corresponding week in 2017. .
Question: what was the net change in the brent oil price from 2016 to 2017?
| 10.48 |
CONVFINQA5646 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2018 form 10-k | 31 business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.34</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>65.23</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>3.15</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 71.34 $ 54.12 $ 43.64 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 65.23 50.80 43.29 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 3.15 2.99 2.52 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel ( 2 ) eia cushing , ok wti ( west texas intermediate ) spot price ( 3 ) eia henry hub natural gas spot price per million british thermal unit 2018 demonstrated the volatility of the oil and gas market . through the first three quarters of 2018 , we experienced stability in the north american and international markets . however , in the fourth quarter of 2018 commodity prices dropped nearly 40% ( 40 % ) resulting in increased customer uncertainty . from an offshore standpoint , through most of 2018 , we saw multiple large offshore projects reach positive final investment decisions , and the lng market and outlook improved throughout 2018 , driven by increased demand globally . in 2018 , the first large north american lng positive final investment decision was reached . outside of north america , customer spending is highly driven by brent oil prices , which increased on average throughout the year . average brent oil prices increased to $ 71.34/bbl in 2018 from $ 54.12/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 50.57/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 86.07/bbl in october 2018 . for the first three quarters of 2018 , brent oil prices increased sequentially . however , in the fourth quarter , brent oil prices declined 39% ( 39 % ) versus the end of the third quarter , as a result of increased supply from the u.s. , worries of a global economic slowdown , and lower than expected production cuts . in north america , customer spending is highly driven by wti oil prices , which similar to brent oil prices , on average increased throughout the year . average wti oil prices increased to $ 65.23/bbl in 2018 from $ 50.80/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 44.48/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 77.41/bbl in june 2018 . in north america , natural gas prices , as measured by the henry hub natural gas spot price , averaged $ 3.15/ mmbtu in 2018 , representing a 6% ( 6 % ) increase over the prior year . throughout the year , henry hub natural gas spot prices ranged from a high of $ 6.24/mmbtu in january 2018 to a low of $ 2.49/mmbtu in february 2018 . according to the u.s . department of energy ( doe ) , working natural gas in storage at the end of 2018 was 2705 billion cubic feet ( bcf ) , which was 15.6% ( 15.6 % ) , or 421 bcf , below the corresponding week in 2017. .
Question: what was the net change in the brent oil price from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 10.48
Question: what was the price in 2016?
| 43.64 |
CONVFINQA5647 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2018 form 10-k | 31 business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.34</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>65.23</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>3.15</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 71.34 $ 54.12 $ 43.64 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 65.23 50.80 43.29 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 3.15 2.99 2.52 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel ( 2 ) eia cushing , ok wti ( west texas intermediate ) spot price ( 3 ) eia henry hub natural gas spot price per million british thermal unit 2018 demonstrated the volatility of the oil and gas market . through the first three quarters of 2018 , we experienced stability in the north american and international markets . however , in the fourth quarter of 2018 commodity prices dropped nearly 40% ( 40 % ) resulting in increased customer uncertainty . from an offshore standpoint , through most of 2018 , we saw multiple large offshore projects reach positive final investment decisions , and the lng market and outlook improved throughout 2018 , driven by increased demand globally . in 2018 , the first large north american lng positive final investment decision was reached . outside of north america , customer spending is highly driven by brent oil prices , which increased on average throughout the year . average brent oil prices increased to $ 71.34/bbl in 2018 from $ 54.12/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 50.57/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 86.07/bbl in october 2018 . for the first three quarters of 2018 , brent oil prices increased sequentially . however , in the fourth quarter , brent oil prices declined 39% ( 39 % ) versus the end of the third quarter , as a result of increased supply from the u.s. , worries of a global economic slowdown , and lower than expected production cuts . in north america , customer spending is highly driven by wti oil prices , which similar to brent oil prices , on average increased throughout the year . average wti oil prices increased to $ 65.23/bbl in 2018 from $ 50.80/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 44.48/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 77.41/bbl in june 2018 . in north america , natural gas prices , as measured by the henry hub natural gas spot price , averaged $ 3.15/ mmbtu in 2018 , representing a 6% ( 6 % ) increase over the prior year . throughout the year , henry hub natural gas spot prices ranged from a high of $ 6.24/mmbtu in january 2018 to a low of $ 2.49/mmbtu in february 2018 . according to the u.s . department of energy ( doe ) , working natural gas in storage at the end of 2018 was 2705 billion cubic feet ( bcf ) , which was 15.6% ( 15.6 % ) , or 421 bcf , below the corresponding week in 2017. .
Question: what was the net change in the brent oil price from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 10.48
Question: what was the price in 2016?
Answer: 43.64
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.24015 |
CONVFINQA5648 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the environmental liability includes costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as for ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties . cost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . we believe that we have adequately accrued for our ultimate share of costs at sites subject to joint and several liability . however , the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . estimates may also vary due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation . we do not expect current obligations to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2006 , we were contingently liable for $ 464 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 6 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . indemnities 2013 our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements , including certain tax indemnifications , can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount , depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements . due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as previously reported in our form 10-q for the quarter ended september 30 , 2005 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2002 . among their proposed adjustments is the disallowance of tax deductions claimed in connection with certain donations of property . in the fourth quarter of 2005 , the irs national office issued a technical advice memorandum which left unresolved whether the deductions were proper , pending further factual development . we continue to dispute the donation issue , as well as many of the other proposed adjustments , and will contest the associated tax deficiencies through the irs appeals process , and , if necessary , litigation . in addition , the irs is examining the corporation 2019s federal income tax returns for tax years 2003 and 2004 and should complete their exam in 2007 . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>72</td><td>135</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>29</td><td>17</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2005?
| 59.0 |
CONVFINQA5649 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the environmental liability includes costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as for ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties . cost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . we believe that we have adequately accrued for our ultimate share of costs at sites subject to joint and several liability . however , the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . estimates may also vary due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation . we do not expect current obligations to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2006 , we were contingently liable for $ 464 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 6 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . indemnities 2013 our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements , including certain tax indemnifications , can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount , depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements . due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as previously reported in our form 10-q for the quarter ended september 30 , 2005 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2002 . among their proposed adjustments is the disallowance of tax deductions claimed in connection with certain donations of property . in the fourth quarter of 2005 , the irs national office issued a technical advice memorandum which left unresolved whether the deductions were proper , pending further factual development . we continue to dispute the donation issue , as well as many of the other proposed adjustments , and will contest the associated tax deficiencies through the irs appeals process , and , if necessary , litigation . in addition , the irs is examining the corporation 2019s federal income tax returns for tax years 2003 and 2004 and should complete their exam in 2007 . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>72</td><td>135</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>29</td><td>17</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2005?
Answer: 59.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
| 55.0 |
CONVFINQA5650 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the environmental liability includes costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as for ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties . cost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . we believe that we have adequately accrued for our ultimate share of costs at sites subject to joint and several liability . however , the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . estimates may also vary due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation . we do not expect current obligations to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2006 , we were contingently liable for $ 464 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 6 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . indemnities 2013 our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements , including certain tax indemnifications , can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount , depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements . due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as previously reported in our form 10-q for the quarter ended september 30 , 2005 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2002 . among their proposed adjustments is the disallowance of tax deductions claimed in connection with certain donations of property . in the fourth quarter of 2005 , the irs national office issued a technical advice memorandum which left unresolved whether the deductions were proper , pending further factual development . we continue to dispute the donation issue , as well as many of the other proposed adjustments , and will contest the associated tax deficiencies through the irs appeals process , and , if necessary , litigation . in addition , the irs is examining the corporation 2019s federal income tax returns for tax years 2003 and 2004 and should complete their exam in 2007 . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>72</td><td>135</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>29</td><td>17</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2005?
Answer: 59.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 55.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 4.0 |
CONVFINQA5651 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the environmental liability includes costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as for ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties . cost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . we believe that we have adequately accrued for our ultimate share of costs at sites subject to joint and several liability . however , the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . estimates may also vary due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation . we do not expect current obligations to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2006 , we were contingently liable for $ 464 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 6 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . indemnities 2013 our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements , including certain tax indemnifications , can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount , depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements . due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as previously reported in our form 10-q for the quarter ended september 30 , 2005 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2002 . among their proposed adjustments is the disallowance of tax deductions claimed in connection with certain donations of property . in the fourth quarter of 2005 , the irs national office issued a technical advice memorandum which left unresolved whether the deductions were proper , pending further factual development . we continue to dispute the donation issue , as well as many of the other proposed adjustments , and will contest the associated tax deficiencies through the irs appeals process , and , if necessary , litigation . in addition , the irs is examining the corporation 2019s federal income tax returns for tax years 2003 and 2004 and should complete their exam in 2007 . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>72</td><td>135</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>29</td><td>17</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2005?
Answer: 59.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 55.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 4.0
Question: what was the 2004 value?
| 55.0 |
CONVFINQA5652 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the environmental liability includes costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as for ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties . cost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . we believe that we have adequately accrued for our ultimate share of costs at sites subject to joint and several liability . however , the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . estimates may also vary due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation . we do not expect current obligations to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2006 , we were contingently liable for $ 464 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 6 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . indemnities 2013 our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements , including certain tax indemnifications , can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount , depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements . due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as previously reported in our form 10-q for the quarter ended september 30 , 2005 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2002 . among their proposed adjustments is the disallowance of tax deductions claimed in connection with certain donations of property . in the fourth quarter of 2005 , the irs national office issued a technical advice memorandum which left unresolved whether the deductions were proper , pending further factual development . we continue to dispute the donation issue , as well as many of the other proposed adjustments , and will contest the associated tax deficiencies through the irs appeals process , and , if necessary , litigation . in addition , the irs is examining the corporation 2019s federal income tax returns for tax years 2003 and 2004 and should complete their exam in 2007 . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>72</td><td>135</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>29</td><td>17</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2005?
Answer: 59.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 55.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 4.0
Question: what was the 2004 value?
Answer: 55.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2004 value?
| 0.07273 |
CONVFINQA5653 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 . acquisitions during fiscal 2017 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 142.8 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 4.2 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 76.4 million of acquired intangible assets ( of which $ 71.5 million represents in-process technology ) , $ 90.2 million of goodwill and $ 19.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred tax liabilities . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other performance-based conditions , through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 . during fiscal 2016 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 42.4 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 1.8 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 23.6 million of goodwill , $ 23.2 million of acquired intangible assets and $ 2.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred revenue . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other conditions , through the second quarter of fiscal a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s chief executive officer ( 201cceo 201d ) and director , owned less than 3% ( 3 % ) of nusemi inc , one of the companies acquired in 2017 , and less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the companies acquired in 2016 . mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transactions and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transactions . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of nusemi inc and rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transactions . acquisition-related transaction costs there were no direct transaction costs associated with acquisitions during fiscal 2018 . transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 0.6 million and $ 1.1 million during fiscal 2017 and 2016 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 9 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>gross carryingamount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2016</td><td>$ 572764</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill resulting from acquisitions</td><td>90218</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>3027</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 30 2017</td><td>666009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-3737 ( 3737 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2018</td><td>$ 662272</td></tr></table> cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .
Question: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2017?
| 666009.0 |
CONVFINQA5654 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 . acquisitions during fiscal 2017 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 142.8 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 4.2 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 76.4 million of acquired intangible assets ( of which $ 71.5 million represents in-process technology ) , $ 90.2 million of goodwill and $ 19.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred tax liabilities . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other performance-based conditions , through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 . during fiscal 2016 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 42.4 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 1.8 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 23.6 million of goodwill , $ 23.2 million of acquired intangible assets and $ 2.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred revenue . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other conditions , through the second quarter of fiscal a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s chief executive officer ( 201cceo 201d ) and director , owned less than 3% ( 3 % ) of nusemi inc , one of the companies acquired in 2017 , and less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the companies acquired in 2016 . mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transactions and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transactions . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of nusemi inc and rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transactions . acquisition-related transaction costs there were no direct transaction costs associated with acquisitions during fiscal 2018 . transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 0.6 million and $ 1.1 million during fiscal 2017 and 2016 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 9 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>gross carryingamount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2016</td><td>$ 572764</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill resulting from acquisitions</td><td>90218</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>3027</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 30 2017</td><td>666009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-3737 ( 3737 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2018</td><td>$ 662272</td></tr></table> cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .
Question: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2017?
Answer: 666009.0
Question: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2016?
| 572764.0 |
CONVFINQA5655 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 . acquisitions during fiscal 2017 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 142.8 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 4.2 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 76.4 million of acquired intangible assets ( of which $ 71.5 million represents in-process technology ) , $ 90.2 million of goodwill and $ 19.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred tax liabilities . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other performance-based conditions , through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 . during fiscal 2016 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 42.4 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 1.8 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 23.6 million of goodwill , $ 23.2 million of acquired intangible assets and $ 2.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred revenue . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other conditions , through the second quarter of fiscal a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s chief executive officer ( 201cceo 201d ) and director , owned less than 3% ( 3 % ) of nusemi inc , one of the companies acquired in 2017 , and less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the companies acquired in 2016 . mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transactions and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transactions . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of nusemi inc and rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transactions . acquisition-related transaction costs there were no direct transaction costs associated with acquisitions during fiscal 2018 . transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 0.6 million and $ 1.1 million during fiscal 2017 and 2016 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 9 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>gross carryingamount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2016</td><td>$ 572764</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill resulting from acquisitions</td><td>90218</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>3027</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 30 2017</td><td>666009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-3737 ( 3737 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2018</td><td>$ 662272</td></tr></table> cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .
Question: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2017?
Answer: 666009.0
Question: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2016?
Answer: 572764.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| 93245.0 |
CONVFINQA5656 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 . acquisitions during fiscal 2017 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 142.8 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 4.2 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 76.4 million of acquired intangible assets ( of which $ 71.5 million represents in-process technology ) , $ 90.2 million of goodwill and $ 19.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred tax liabilities . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other performance-based conditions , through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 . during fiscal 2016 , cadence completed two business combinations for total cash consideration of $ 42.4 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 1.8 million . the total purchase consideration was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective estimated fair values on the acquisition dates . cadence recorded a total of $ 23.6 million of goodwill , $ 23.2 million of acquired intangible assets and $ 2.6 million of net liabilities consisting primarily of deferred revenue . cadence will also make payments to certain employees , subject to continued employment and other conditions , through the second quarter of fiscal a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s chief executive officer ( 201cceo 201d ) and director , owned less than 3% ( 3 % ) of nusemi inc , one of the companies acquired in 2017 , and less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the companies acquired in 2016 . mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transactions and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transactions . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of nusemi inc and rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transactions . acquisition-related transaction costs there were no direct transaction costs associated with acquisitions during fiscal 2018 . transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 0.6 million and $ 1.1 million during fiscal 2017 and 2016 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 9 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>gross carryingamount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2016</td><td>$ 572764</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill resulting from acquisitions</td><td>90218</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>3027</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 30 2017</td><td>666009</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of foreign currency translation</td><td>-3737 ( 3737 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2018</td><td>$ 662272</td></tr></table> cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .
Question: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2017?
Answer: 666009.0
Question: what was the goodwill balance at the end of 2016?
Answer: 572764.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 93245.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.1628 |
CONVFINQA5657 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
affected by lower sales volume of cabinets , the divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent compared to 2016 . net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware , which , in aggregate , increased sales by approximately five percent compared to 2015 . net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , increased sales approximately one percent . net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent . net sales for 2015 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products , windows and builders' hardware . net sales for 2015 were also positively affected by net selling price increases of plumbing products , cabinets and windows , as well as sales mix of north american cabinets and windows . net sales for 2015 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products . our gross profit margins were 34.2 percent , 33.4 percent and 31.5 percent in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the 2017 and 2016 gross profit margins were positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives . 2016 gross profit margins were negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs resulting from a change in our estimate of expected future warranty claim costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 18.9 percent in 2017 compared with 19.1 percent in 2016 and 18.7 percent in 2015 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2017 reflect increased sales and the effect of cost containment measures , partially offset by an increase in strategic growth investments , stock-based compensation , health insurance costs and trade show costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2016 reflect strategic growth investments , erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating profit as reported</td><td>$ 1169</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 914</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rationalization charges</td><td>4</td><td>22</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gain from sale of property and equipment</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating profit as adjusted</td><td>$ 1173</td><td>$ 1075</td><td>$ 927</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating profit margins as reported</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>12.8% ( 12.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating profit margins as adjusted</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td><td>14.6% ( 14.6 % )</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td></tr></table> operating profit margins in 2017 and 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs . operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count . operating profit margin in 2016 was negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs by a business in our windows and other specialty products segment and an increase in strategic growth investments , as well as erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . .......................................................... . .................................................................. . ..................................... . ........................................................ . ............................................ . ............................................. .
Question: what was the difference in adjusted operating profit margins between 2015 and 2016?
| 0.016 |
CONVFINQA5658 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
affected by lower sales volume of cabinets , the divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent compared to 2016 . net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware , which , in aggregate , increased sales by approximately five percent compared to 2015 . net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , increased sales approximately one percent . net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent . net sales for 2015 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products , windows and builders' hardware . net sales for 2015 were also positively affected by net selling price increases of plumbing products , cabinets and windows , as well as sales mix of north american cabinets and windows . net sales for 2015 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products . our gross profit margins were 34.2 percent , 33.4 percent and 31.5 percent in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the 2017 and 2016 gross profit margins were positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives . 2016 gross profit margins were negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs resulting from a change in our estimate of expected future warranty claim costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 18.9 percent in 2017 compared with 19.1 percent in 2016 and 18.7 percent in 2015 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2017 reflect increased sales and the effect of cost containment measures , partially offset by an increase in strategic growth investments , stock-based compensation , health insurance costs and trade show costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2016 reflect strategic growth investments , erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating profit as reported</td><td>$ 1169</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 914</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rationalization charges</td><td>4</td><td>22</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gain from sale of property and equipment</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating profit as adjusted</td><td>$ 1173</td><td>$ 1075</td><td>$ 927</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating profit margins as reported</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>12.8% ( 12.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating profit margins as adjusted</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td><td>14.6% ( 14.6 % )</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td></tr></table> operating profit margins in 2017 and 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs . operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count . operating profit margin in 2016 was negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs by a business in our windows and other specialty products segment and an increase in strategic growth investments , as well as erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . .......................................................... . .................................................................. . ..................................... . ........................................................ . ............................................ . ............................................. .
Question: what was the difference in adjusted operating profit margins between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 0.016
Question: and the difference in gross profit margin between 2016 and 2017?
| 0.8 |
CONVFINQA5659 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
affected by lower sales volume of cabinets , the divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent compared to 2016 . net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware , which , in aggregate , increased sales by approximately five percent compared to 2015 . net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , increased sales approximately one percent . net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent . net sales for 2015 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products , windows and builders' hardware . net sales for 2015 were also positively affected by net selling price increases of plumbing products , cabinets and windows , as well as sales mix of north american cabinets and windows . net sales for 2015 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products . our gross profit margins were 34.2 percent , 33.4 percent and 31.5 percent in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the 2017 and 2016 gross profit margins were positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives . 2016 gross profit margins were negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs resulting from a change in our estimate of expected future warranty claim costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 18.9 percent in 2017 compared with 19.1 percent in 2016 and 18.7 percent in 2015 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2017 reflect increased sales and the effect of cost containment measures , partially offset by an increase in strategic growth investments , stock-based compensation , health insurance costs and trade show costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2016 reflect strategic growth investments , erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating profit as reported</td><td>$ 1169</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 914</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rationalization charges</td><td>4</td><td>22</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gain from sale of property and equipment</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating profit as adjusted</td><td>$ 1173</td><td>$ 1075</td><td>$ 927</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating profit margins as reported</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>12.8% ( 12.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating profit margins as adjusted</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td><td>14.6% ( 14.6 % )</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td></tr></table> operating profit margins in 2017 and 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs . operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count . operating profit margin in 2016 was negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs by a business in our windows and other specialty products segment and an increase in strategic growth investments , as well as erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . .......................................................... . .................................................................. . ..................................... . ........................................................ . ............................................ . ............................................. .
Question: what was the difference in adjusted operating profit margins between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 0.016
Question: and the difference in gross profit margin between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 0.8
Question: and what was the percentage change during this time?
| 0.02395 |
CONVFINQA5660 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 887.3</td><td>$ 1023.2</td><td>$ 848.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-29.9 ( 29.9 )</td><td>-414.9 ( 414.9 )</td><td>-99.9 ( 99.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td><td>-60.4 ( 60.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td><td>$ 688.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td><td>-199.7 ( 199.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td><td>-490.9 ( 490.9 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .
Question: what was the total of corporate and other expenses in 2015?
| 141.8 |
CONVFINQA5661 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 887.3</td><td>$ 1023.2</td><td>$ 848.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-29.9 ( 29.9 )</td><td>-414.9 ( 414.9 )</td><td>-99.9 ( 99.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td><td>-60.4 ( 60.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td><td>$ 688.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td><td>-199.7 ( 199.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td><td>-490.9 ( 490.9 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .
Question: what was the total of corporate and other expenses in 2015?
Answer: 141.8
Question: and what was it in 2016?
| 147.2 |
CONVFINQA5662 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 887.3</td><td>$ 1023.2</td><td>$ 848.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-29.9 ( 29.9 )</td><td>-414.9 ( 414.9 )</td><td>-99.9 ( 99.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td><td>-60.4 ( 60.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td><td>$ 688.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td><td>-199.7 ( 199.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td><td>-490.9 ( 490.9 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .
Question: what was the total of corporate and other expenses in 2015?
Answer: 141.8
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 147.2
Question: what was, then, the combined total of corporate and other expenses for both of those years?
| 289.0 |
CONVFINQA5663 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 887.3</td><td>$ 1023.2</td><td>$ 848.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-29.9 ( 29.9 )</td><td>-414.9 ( 414.9 )</td><td>-99.9 ( 99.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td><td>-60.4 ( 60.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td><td>$ 688.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td><td>-199.7 ( 199.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td><td>-490.9 ( 490.9 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .
Question: what was the total of corporate and other expenses in 2015?
Answer: 141.8
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 147.2
Question: what was, then, the combined total of corporate and other expenses for both of those years?
Answer: 289.0
Question: including corporate and other expenses from 2017, what would then be the total for three years?
| 415.6 |
CONVFINQA5664 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued acquisition of magma design automation , inc . ( magma ) on february 22 , 2012 , the company acquired all outstanding shares of magma , a chip design software provider , at a per-share price of $ 7.35 . additionally , the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options , collectively called 201cequity awards . 201d the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 550.2 million . this acquisition enables the company to more rapidly meet the needs of leading-edge semiconductor designers for more sophisticated design tools . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 543437</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>6797</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 550234</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316263</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>184300</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>116265</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>debt and liabilities assumed</td><td>-66594 ( 66594 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 550234</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 316.3 million , which is not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of magma 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to ten years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination totaling $ 33.5 million for fiscal 2012 were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations and consist primarily of employee separation costs , contract terminations , professional services , and facilities closure costs . fair value of equity awards assumed . the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options with a fair value of $ 22.2 million . the black-scholes option-pricing model was used to determine the fair value of these stock options , whereas the fair value of the rsus was based on the market price on the grant date of the instruments . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . of the total fair value of the equity awards assumed , $ 6.8 million was allocated to the purchase consideration and $ 15.4 million was allocated to future services to be expensed over their remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . supplemental pro forma information ( unaudited ) . the financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the company and magma , on a pro forma basis , as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2011. .
Question: what is the sum of goodwill and identifiable intangibles assets acquired
| 500563.0 |
CONVFINQA5665 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued acquisition of magma design automation , inc . ( magma ) on february 22 , 2012 , the company acquired all outstanding shares of magma , a chip design software provider , at a per-share price of $ 7.35 . additionally , the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options , collectively called 201cequity awards . 201d the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 550.2 million . this acquisition enables the company to more rapidly meet the needs of leading-edge semiconductor designers for more sophisticated design tools . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 543437</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>6797</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 550234</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316263</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>184300</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>116265</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>debt and liabilities assumed</td><td>-66594 ( 66594 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 550234</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 316.3 million , which is not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of magma 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to ten years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination totaling $ 33.5 million for fiscal 2012 were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations and consist primarily of employee separation costs , contract terminations , professional services , and facilities closure costs . fair value of equity awards assumed . the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options with a fair value of $ 22.2 million . the black-scholes option-pricing model was used to determine the fair value of these stock options , whereas the fair value of the rsus was based on the market price on the grant date of the instruments . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . of the total fair value of the equity awards assumed , $ 6.8 million was allocated to the purchase consideration and $ 15.4 million was allocated to future services to be expensed over their remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . supplemental pro forma information ( unaudited ) . the financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the company and magma , on a pro forma basis , as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2011. .
Question: what is the sum of goodwill and identifiable intangibles assets acquired
Answer: 500563.0
Question: what was the total purchase allocation?
| 550234.0 |
CONVFINQA5666 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued acquisition of magma design automation , inc . ( magma ) on february 22 , 2012 , the company acquired all outstanding shares of magma , a chip design software provider , at a per-share price of $ 7.35 . additionally , the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options , collectively called 201cequity awards . 201d the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 550.2 million . this acquisition enables the company to more rapidly meet the needs of leading-edge semiconductor designers for more sophisticated design tools . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 543437</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>6797</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 550234</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316263</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>184300</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>116265</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>debt and liabilities assumed</td><td>-66594 ( 66594 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 550234</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 316.3 million , which is not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of magma 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to ten years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination totaling $ 33.5 million for fiscal 2012 were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations and consist primarily of employee separation costs , contract terminations , professional services , and facilities closure costs . fair value of equity awards assumed . the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options with a fair value of $ 22.2 million . the black-scholes option-pricing model was used to determine the fair value of these stock options , whereas the fair value of the rsus was based on the market price on the grant date of the instruments . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . of the total fair value of the equity awards assumed , $ 6.8 million was allocated to the purchase consideration and $ 15.4 million was allocated to future services to be expensed over their remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . supplemental pro forma information ( unaudited ) . the financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the company and magma , on a pro forma basis , as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2011. .
Question: what is the sum of goodwill and identifiable intangibles assets acquired
Answer: 500563.0
Question: what was the total purchase allocation?
Answer: 550234.0
Question: what is the prior sum divided by the total purchase allocation?
| 0.90973 |
CONVFINQA5667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7384</td><td>$ 6836</td><td>$ 7339</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>443</td><td>360</td><td>345</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2002 compared to 2001 . the increase in sales for 2002 resulted from higher volume in government space of $ 370 million and commercial space of $ 180 million . in government space , increases of $ 470 million in government satellite programs and $ 130 million in ground systems activities more than offset volume declines of $ 175 million on government launch vehi- cles and $ 55 million on strategic missile programs . the increase in commercial space sales is primarily attributable to an increase in launch vehicle activities , with nine commercial launches during 2002 compared to six in 2001 . net sales for the segment decreased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2001 com- pared to 2000 . the decrease in sales for 2001 resulted from volume declines in commercial space of $ 560 million , which more than offset increases in government space of $ 60 million . in commercial space , sales declined due to volume reductions of $ 480 million in commercial launch vehicle activities and $ 80 million in satellite programs . there were six launches in 2001 compared to 14 launches in 2000 . the increase in gov- ernment space resulted from a combined increase of $ 230 mil- lion related to higher volume on government satellite programs and ground systems activities . these increases were partially offset by a $ 110 million decrease related to volume declines in government launch vehicle activity , primarily due to program maturities , and by $ 50 million due to the absence in 2001 of favorable adjustments recorded on the titan iv pro- gram in 2000 . operating profit for the segment increased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2002 as compared to 2001 , mainly driven by the commercial space business . reduced losses in commercial space during 2002 resulted in increased operating profit of $ 90 million when compared to 2001 . commercial satellite manufacturing losses declined $ 100 million in 2002 as operating performance improved and satellite deliveries increased . in the first quarter of 2001 , a $ 40 million loss provision was recorded on certain commercial satellite manufacturing contracts . due to the industry-wide oversupply and deterioration of pricing in the commercial launch market , financial results on commercial launch vehicles continue to be challenging . during 2002 , this trend led to a decline in operating profit of $ 10 million on commercial launch vehicles when compared to 2001 . this decrease was primarily due to lower profitability of $ 55 mil- lion on the three additional launches in the current year , addi- tional charges of $ 60 million ( net of a favorable contract adjustment of $ 20 million ) for market and pricing pressures and included the adverse effect of a $ 35 million adjustment for commercial launch vehicle contract settlement costs . the 2001 results also included charges for market and pricing pressures , which reduced that year 2019s operating profit by $ 145 million . the $ 10 million decrease in government space 2019s operating profit for the year is primarily due to the reduced volume on government launch vehicles and strategic missile programs , which combined to decrease operating profit by $ 80 million , partially offset by increases of $ 40 million in government satellite programs and $ 30 million in ground systems activities . operating profit for the segment increased by 4% ( 4 % ) in 2001 compared to 2000 . operating profit increased in 2001 due to a $ 35 million increase in government space partially offset by higher year-over-year losses of $ 20 million in commercial space . in government space , operating profit increased due to the impact of higher volume and improved performance in ground systems and government satellite programs . the year- to-year comparison of operating profit was not affected by the $ 50 million favorable titan iv adjustment recorded in 2000 discussed above , due to a $ 55 million charge related to a more conservative assessment of government launch vehi- cle programs that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000 . in commercial space , decreased operating profit of $ 15 mil- lion on launch vehicles more than offset lower losses on satel- lite manufacturing activities . the commercial launch vehicle operating results included $ 60 million in higher charges for market and pricing pressures when compared to 2000 . these negative adjustments were partially offset by $ 50 million of favorable contract adjustments on certain launch vehicle con- tracts . commercial satellite manufacturing losses decreased slightly from 2000 and included the adverse impact of a $ 40 million loss provision recorded in the first quarter of 2001 for certain commercial satellite contracts related to schedule and technical issues. .
Question: what was the profit margin for lockheed martin in 2002?
| 0.05999 |
CONVFINQA5668 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7384</td><td>$ 6836</td><td>$ 7339</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>443</td><td>360</td><td>345</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2002 compared to 2001 . the increase in sales for 2002 resulted from higher volume in government space of $ 370 million and commercial space of $ 180 million . in government space , increases of $ 470 million in government satellite programs and $ 130 million in ground systems activities more than offset volume declines of $ 175 million on government launch vehi- cles and $ 55 million on strategic missile programs . the increase in commercial space sales is primarily attributable to an increase in launch vehicle activities , with nine commercial launches during 2002 compared to six in 2001 . net sales for the segment decreased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2001 com- pared to 2000 . the decrease in sales for 2001 resulted from volume declines in commercial space of $ 560 million , which more than offset increases in government space of $ 60 million . in commercial space , sales declined due to volume reductions of $ 480 million in commercial launch vehicle activities and $ 80 million in satellite programs . there were six launches in 2001 compared to 14 launches in 2000 . the increase in gov- ernment space resulted from a combined increase of $ 230 mil- lion related to higher volume on government satellite programs and ground systems activities . these increases were partially offset by a $ 110 million decrease related to volume declines in government launch vehicle activity , primarily due to program maturities , and by $ 50 million due to the absence in 2001 of favorable adjustments recorded on the titan iv pro- gram in 2000 . operating profit for the segment increased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2002 as compared to 2001 , mainly driven by the commercial space business . reduced losses in commercial space during 2002 resulted in increased operating profit of $ 90 million when compared to 2001 . commercial satellite manufacturing losses declined $ 100 million in 2002 as operating performance improved and satellite deliveries increased . in the first quarter of 2001 , a $ 40 million loss provision was recorded on certain commercial satellite manufacturing contracts . due to the industry-wide oversupply and deterioration of pricing in the commercial launch market , financial results on commercial launch vehicles continue to be challenging . during 2002 , this trend led to a decline in operating profit of $ 10 million on commercial launch vehicles when compared to 2001 . this decrease was primarily due to lower profitability of $ 55 mil- lion on the three additional launches in the current year , addi- tional charges of $ 60 million ( net of a favorable contract adjustment of $ 20 million ) for market and pricing pressures and included the adverse effect of a $ 35 million adjustment for commercial launch vehicle contract settlement costs . the 2001 results also included charges for market and pricing pressures , which reduced that year 2019s operating profit by $ 145 million . the $ 10 million decrease in government space 2019s operating profit for the year is primarily due to the reduced volume on government launch vehicles and strategic missile programs , which combined to decrease operating profit by $ 80 million , partially offset by increases of $ 40 million in government satellite programs and $ 30 million in ground systems activities . operating profit for the segment increased by 4% ( 4 % ) in 2001 compared to 2000 . operating profit increased in 2001 due to a $ 35 million increase in government space partially offset by higher year-over-year losses of $ 20 million in commercial space . in government space , operating profit increased due to the impact of higher volume and improved performance in ground systems and government satellite programs . the year- to-year comparison of operating profit was not affected by the $ 50 million favorable titan iv adjustment recorded in 2000 discussed above , due to a $ 55 million charge related to a more conservative assessment of government launch vehi- cle programs that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000 . in commercial space , decreased operating profit of $ 15 mil- lion on launch vehicles more than offset lower losses on satel- lite manufacturing activities . the commercial launch vehicle operating results included $ 60 million in higher charges for market and pricing pressures when compared to 2000 . these negative adjustments were partially offset by $ 50 million of favorable contract adjustments on certain launch vehicle con- tracts . commercial satellite manufacturing losses decreased slightly from 2000 and included the adverse impact of a $ 40 million loss provision recorded in the first quarter of 2001 for certain commercial satellite contracts related to schedule and technical issues. .
Question: what was the profit margin for lockheed martin in 2002?
Answer: 0.05999
Question: what was the total operating profit in 2002 and 2001?
| 803.0 |
CONVFINQA5669 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7384</td><td>$ 6836</td><td>$ 7339</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>443</td><td>360</td><td>345</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2002 compared to 2001 . the increase in sales for 2002 resulted from higher volume in government space of $ 370 million and commercial space of $ 180 million . in government space , increases of $ 470 million in government satellite programs and $ 130 million in ground systems activities more than offset volume declines of $ 175 million on government launch vehi- cles and $ 55 million on strategic missile programs . the increase in commercial space sales is primarily attributable to an increase in launch vehicle activities , with nine commercial launches during 2002 compared to six in 2001 . net sales for the segment decreased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2001 com- pared to 2000 . the decrease in sales for 2001 resulted from volume declines in commercial space of $ 560 million , which more than offset increases in government space of $ 60 million . in commercial space , sales declined due to volume reductions of $ 480 million in commercial launch vehicle activities and $ 80 million in satellite programs . there were six launches in 2001 compared to 14 launches in 2000 . the increase in gov- ernment space resulted from a combined increase of $ 230 mil- lion related to higher volume on government satellite programs and ground systems activities . these increases were partially offset by a $ 110 million decrease related to volume declines in government launch vehicle activity , primarily due to program maturities , and by $ 50 million due to the absence in 2001 of favorable adjustments recorded on the titan iv pro- gram in 2000 . operating profit for the segment increased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2002 as compared to 2001 , mainly driven by the commercial space business . reduced losses in commercial space during 2002 resulted in increased operating profit of $ 90 million when compared to 2001 . commercial satellite manufacturing losses declined $ 100 million in 2002 as operating performance improved and satellite deliveries increased . in the first quarter of 2001 , a $ 40 million loss provision was recorded on certain commercial satellite manufacturing contracts . due to the industry-wide oversupply and deterioration of pricing in the commercial launch market , financial results on commercial launch vehicles continue to be challenging . during 2002 , this trend led to a decline in operating profit of $ 10 million on commercial launch vehicles when compared to 2001 . this decrease was primarily due to lower profitability of $ 55 mil- lion on the three additional launches in the current year , addi- tional charges of $ 60 million ( net of a favorable contract adjustment of $ 20 million ) for market and pricing pressures and included the adverse effect of a $ 35 million adjustment for commercial launch vehicle contract settlement costs . the 2001 results also included charges for market and pricing pressures , which reduced that year 2019s operating profit by $ 145 million . the $ 10 million decrease in government space 2019s operating profit for the year is primarily due to the reduced volume on government launch vehicles and strategic missile programs , which combined to decrease operating profit by $ 80 million , partially offset by increases of $ 40 million in government satellite programs and $ 30 million in ground systems activities . operating profit for the segment increased by 4% ( 4 % ) in 2001 compared to 2000 . operating profit increased in 2001 due to a $ 35 million increase in government space partially offset by higher year-over-year losses of $ 20 million in commercial space . in government space , operating profit increased due to the impact of higher volume and improved performance in ground systems and government satellite programs . the year- to-year comparison of operating profit was not affected by the $ 50 million favorable titan iv adjustment recorded in 2000 discussed above , due to a $ 55 million charge related to a more conservative assessment of government launch vehi- cle programs that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000 . in commercial space , decreased operating profit of $ 15 mil- lion on launch vehicles more than offset lower losses on satel- lite manufacturing activities . the commercial launch vehicle operating results included $ 60 million in higher charges for market and pricing pressures when compared to 2000 . these negative adjustments were partially offset by $ 50 million of favorable contract adjustments on certain launch vehicle con- tracts . commercial satellite manufacturing losses decreased slightly from 2000 and included the adverse impact of a $ 40 million loss provision recorded in the first quarter of 2001 for certain commercial satellite contracts related to schedule and technical issues. .
Question: what was the profit margin for lockheed martin in 2002?
Answer: 0.05999
Question: what was the total operating profit in 2002 and 2001?
Answer: 803.0
Question: and including the value for 2003?
| 1148.0 |
CONVFINQA5670 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7384</td><td>$ 6836</td><td>$ 7339</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>443</td><td>360</td><td>345</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2002 compared to 2001 . the increase in sales for 2002 resulted from higher volume in government space of $ 370 million and commercial space of $ 180 million . in government space , increases of $ 470 million in government satellite programs and $ 130 million in ground systems activities more than offset volume declines of $ 175 million on government launch vehi- cles and $ 55 million on strategic missile programs . the increase in commercial space sales is primarily attributable to an increase in launch vehicle activities , with nine commercial launches during 2002 compared to six in 2001 . net sales for the segment decreased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2001 com- pared to 2000 . the decrease in sales for 2001 resulted from volume declines in commercial space of $ 560 million , which more than offset increases in government space of $ 60 million . in commercial space , sales declined due to volume reductions of $ 480 million in commercial launch vehicle activities and $ 80 million in satellite programs . there were six launches in 2001 compared to 14 launches in 2000 . the increase in gov- ernment space resulted from a combined increase of $ 230 mil- lion related to higher volume on government satellite programs and ground systems activities . these increases were partially offset by a $ 110 million decrease related to volume declines in government launch vehicle activity , primarily due to program maturities , and by $ 50 million due to the absence in 2001 of favorable adjustments recorded on the titan iv pro- gram in 2000 . operating profit for the segment increased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2002 as compared to 2001 , mainly driven by the commercial space business . reduced losses in commercial space during 2002 resulted in increased operating profit of $ 90 million when compared to 2001 . commercial satellite manufacturing losses declined $ 100 million in 2002 as operating performance improved and satellite deliveries increased . in the first quarter of 2001 , a $ 40 million loss provision was recorded on certain commercial satellite manufacturing contracts . due to the industry-wide oversupply and deterioration of pricing in the commercial launch market , financial results on commercial launch vehicles continue to be challenging . during 2002 , this trend led to a decline in operating profit of $ 10 million on commercial launch vehicles when compared to 2001 . this decrease was primarily due to lower profitability of $ 55 mil- lion on the three additional launches in the current year , addi- tional charges of $ 60 million ( net of a favorable contract adjustment of $ 20 million ) for market and pricing pressures and included the adverse effect of a $ 35 million adjustment for commercial launch vehicle contract settlement costs . the 2001 results also included charges for market and pricing pressures , which reduced that year 2019s operating profit by $ 145 million . the $ 10 million decrease in government space 2019s operating profit for the year is primarily due to the reduced volume on government launch vehicles and strategic missile programs , which combined to decrease operating profit by $ 80 million , partially offset by increases of $ 40 million in government satellite programs and $ 30 million in ground systems activities . operating profit for the segment increased by 4% ( 4 % ) in 2001 compared to 2000 . operating profit increased in 2001 due to a $ 35 million increase in government space partially offset by higher year-over-year losses of $ 20 million in commercial space . in government space , operating profit increased due to the impact of higher volume and improved performance in ground systems and government satellite programs . the year- to-year comparison of operating profit was not affected by the $ 50 million favorable titan iv adjustment recorded in 2000 discussed above , due to a $ 55 million charge related to a more conservative assessment of government launch vehi- cle programs that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000 . in commercial space , decreased operating profit of $ 15 mil- lion on launch vehicles more than offset lower losses on satel- lite manufacturing activities . the commercial launch vehicle operating results included $ 60 million in higher charges for market and pricing pressures when compared to 2000 . these negative adjustments were partially offset by $ 50 million of favorable contract adjustments on certain launch vehicle con- tracts . commercial satellite manufacturing losses decreased slightly from 2000 and included the adverse impact of a $ 40 million loss provision recorded in the first quarter of 2001 for certain commercial satellite contracts related to schedule and technical issues. .
Question: what was the profit margin for lockheed martin in 2002?
Answer: 0.05999
Question: what was the total operating profit in 2002 and 2001?
Answer: 803.0
Question: and including the value for 2003?
Answer: 1148.0
Question: so what was the average value during this time?
| 382.66667 |
CONVFINQA5671 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our consolidated net cash flows used for investing activities were $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , compared with $ 3.2 billion in 2009 . net investing activities for the indicated periods were related primarily to net purchases of fixed maturities and for 2010 included the acquisitions of rain and hail and jerneh insurance berhad . our consolidated net cash flows from financing activities were $ 732 million in 2010 , compared with net cash flows used for financing activities of $ 321 million in 2009 . net cash flows from/used for financing activities in 2010 and 2009 , included dividends paid on our common shares of $ 435 million and $ 388 million , respectively . net cash flows from financing activ- ities in 2010 , included net proceeds of $ 699 million from the issuance of long-term debt , $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements , and $ 300 million in credit facility borrowings . this was partially offset by repayment of $ 659 million in debt and share repurchases settled in 2010 of $ 235 million . for 2009 , net cash flows used for financing activities included net pro- ceeds from the issuance of $ 500 million in long-term debt and the net repayment of debt and reverse repurchase agreements of $ 466 million . both internal and external forces influence our financial condition , results of operations , and cash flows . claim settle- ments , premium levels , and investment returns may be impacted by changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions . in many cases , significant periods of time , ranging up to several years or more , may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss , the reporting of the loss to us , and the settlement of the liability for that loss . from time to time , we utilize reverse repurchase agreements as a low-cost alternative for short-term funding needs . we use these instruments on a limited basis to address short-term cash timing differences without disrupting our investment portfolio holdings and settle the transactions with future operating cash flows . at december 31 , 2010 , there were $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding ( refer to short-term debt ) . in addition to cash from operations , routine sales of investments , and financing arrangements , we have agreements with a bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs to enhance cash management efficiency during periods of short-term timing mismatches between expected inflows and outflows of cash by currency . in each program , participating ace entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider and each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency ( u.s . dollars ) and then notionally pooled . the bank extends overdraft credit to any participating ace entity as needed , provided that the overall notionally-pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero . actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not co-mingled between legal entities . ace entities may incur overdraft balances as a means to address short-term timing mismatches , and any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ace entity would be guaranteed by ace limited ( up to $ 150 million in the aggregate ) . our revolving credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ace entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool . capital resources capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations . the following table summarizes the components of our capital resources at december 31 , 2010 , and 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term debt</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>3358</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>4658</td><td>3319</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>309</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>22974</td><td>19667</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capitalization</td><td>$ 27941</td><td>$ 23295</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ratio of debt to total capitalization</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>14.2% ( 14.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ratio of debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization</td><td>17.8% ( 17.8 % )</td><td>15.6% ( 15.6 % )</td></tr></table> our ratios of debt to total capitalization and debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization have increased temporarily due to the increase in short-term debt , as discussed below . we expect that these ratios will decline over the next six to nine months as we repay the short-term debt . we believe our financial strength provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain available funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis . our ability to access the capital markets is dependent on , among other things , market conditions and our perceived financial strength . we have accessed both the debt and equity markets from time to time. .
Question: what was the value of total debt in 2010?
| 4658.0 |
CONVFINQA5672 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our consolidated net cash flows used for investing activities were $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , compared with $ 3.2 billion in 2009 . net investing activities for the indicated periods were related primarily to net purchases of fixed maturities and for 2010 included the acquisitions of rain and hail and jerneh insurance berhad . our consolidated net cash flows from financing activities were $ 732 million in 2010 , compared with net cash flows used for financing activities of $ 321 million in 2009 . net cash flows from/used for financing activities in 2010 and 2009 , included dividends paid on our common shares of $ 435 million and $ 388 million , respectively . net cash flows from financing activ- ities in 2010 , included net proceeds of $ 699 million from the issuance of long-term debt , $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements , and $ 300 million in credit facility borrowings . this was partially offset by repayment of $ 659 million in debt and share repurchases settled in 2010 of $ 235 million . for 2009 , net cash flows used for financing activities included net pro- ceeds from the issuance of $ 500 million in long-term debt and the net repayment of debt and reverse repurchase agreements of $ 466 million . both internal and external forces influence our financial condition , results of operations , and cash flows . claim settle- ments , premium levels , and investment returns may be impacted by changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions . in many cases , significant periods of time , ranging up to several years or more , may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss , the reporting of the loss to us , and the settlement of the liability for that loss . from time to time , we utilize reverse repurchase agreements as a low-cost alternative for short-term funding needs . we use these instruments on a limited basis to address short-term cash timing differences without disrupting our investment portfolio holdings and settle the transactions with future operating cash flows . at december 31 , 2010 , there were $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding ( refer to short-term debt ) . in addition to cash from operations , routine sales of investments , and financing arrangements , we have agreements with a bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs to enhance cash management efficiency during periods of short-term timing mismatches between expected inflows and outflows of cash by currency . in each program , participating ace entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider and each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency ( u.s . dollars ) and then notionally pooled . the bank extends overdraft credit to any participating ace entity as needed , provided that the overall notionally-pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero . actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not co-mingled between legal entities . ace entities may incur overdraft balances as a means to address short-term timing mismatches , and any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ace entity would be guaranteed by ace limited ( up to $ 150 million in the aggregate ) . our revolving credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ace entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool . capital resources capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations . the following table summarizes the components of our capital resources at december 31 , 2010 , and 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term debt</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>3358</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>4658</td><td>3319</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>309</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>22974</td><td>19667</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capitalization</td><td>$ 27941</td><td>$ 23295</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ratio of debt to total capitalization</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>14.2% ( 14.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ratio of debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization</td><td>17.8% ( 17.8 % )</td><td>15.6% ( 15.6 % )</td></tr></table> our ratios of debt to total capitalization and debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization have increased temporarily due to the increase in short-term debt , as discussed below . we expect that these ratios will decline over the next six to nine months as we repay the short-term debt . we believe our financial strength provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain available funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis . our ability to access the capital markets is dependent on , among other things , market conditions and our perceived financial strength . we have accessed both the debt and equity markets from time to time. .
Question: what was the value of total debt in 2010?
Answer: 4658.0
Question: what was total shareholder equity in 2010?
| 22974.0 |
CONVFINQA5673 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our consolidated net cash flows used for investing activities were $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , compared with $ 3.2 billion in 2009 . net investing activities for the indicated periods were related primarily to net purchases of fixed maturities and for 2010 included the acquisitions of rain and hail and jerneh insurance berhad . our consolidated net cash flows from financing activities were $ 732 million in 2010 , compared with net cash flows used for financing activities of $ 321 million in 2009 . net cash flows from/used for financing activities in 2010 and 2009 , included dividends paid on our common shares of $ 435 million and $ 388 million , respectively . net cash flows from financing activ- ities in 2010 , included net proceeds of $ 699 million from the issuance of long-term debt , $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements , and $ 300 million in credit facility borrowings . this was partially offset by repayment of $ 659 million in debt and share repurchases settled in 2010 of $ 235 million . for 2009 , net cash flows used for financing activities included net pro- ceeds from the issuance of $ 500 million in long-term debt and the net repayment of debt and reverse repurchase agreements of $ 466 million . both internal and external forces influence our financial condition , results of operations , and cash flows . claim settle- ments , premium levels , and investment returns may be impacted by changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions . in many cases , significant periods of time , ranging up to several years or more , may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss , the reporting of the loss to us , and the settlement of the liability for that loss . from time to time , we utilize reverse repurchase agreements as a low-cost alternative for short-term funding needs . we use these instruments on a limited basis to address short-term cash timing differences without disrupting our investment portfolio holdings and settle the transactions with future operating cash flows . at december 31 , 2010 , there were $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding ( refer to short-term debt ) . in addition to cash from operations , routine sales of investments , and financing arrangements , we have agreements with a bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs to enhance cash management efficiency during periods of short-term timing mismatches between expected inflows and outflows of cash by currency . in each program , participating ace entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider and each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency ( u.s . dollars ) and then notionally pooled . the bank extends overdraft credit to any participating ace entity as needed , provided that the overall notionally-pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero . actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not co-mingled between legal entities . ace entities may incur overdraft balances as a means to address short-term timing mismatches , and any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ace entity would be guaranteed by ace limited ( up to $ 150 million in the aggregate ) . our revolving credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ace entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool . capital resources capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations . the following table summarizes the components of our capital resources at december 31 , 2010 , and 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term debt</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>3358</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>4658</td><td>3319</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>309</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>22974</td><td>19667</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capitalization</td><td>$ 27941</td><td>$ 23295</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ratio of debt to total capitalization</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>14.2% ( 14.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ratio of debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization</td><td>17.8% ( 17.8 % )</td><td>15.6% ( 15.6 % )</td></tr></table> our ratios of debt to total capitalization and debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization have increased temporarily due to the increase in short-term debt , as discussed below . we expect that these ratios will decline over the next six to nine months as we repay the short-term debt . we believe our financial strength provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain available funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis . our ability to access the capital markets is dependent on , among other things , market conditions and our perceived financial strength . we have accessed both the debt and equity markets from time to time. .
Question: what was the value of total debt in 2010?
Answer: 4658.0
Question: what was total shareholder equity in 2010?
Answer: 22974.0
Question: what is the sum of debt and equity?
| 27632.0 |
CONVFINQA5674 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our consolidated net cash flows used for investing activities were $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , compared with $ 3.2 billion in 2009 . net investing activities for the indicated periods were related primarily to net purchases of fixed maturities and for 2010 included the acquisitions of rain and hail and jerneh insurance berhad . our consolidated net cash flows from financing activities were $ 732 million in 2010 , compared with net cash flows used for financing activities of $ 321 million in 2009 . net cash flows from/used for financing activities in 2010 and 2009 , included dividends paid on our common shares of $ 435 million and $ 388 million , respectively . net cash flows from financing activ- ities in 2010 , included net proceeds of $ 699 million from the issuance of long-term debt , $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements , and $ 300 million in credit facility borrowings . this was partially offset by repayment of $ 659 million in debt and share repurchases settled in 2010 of $ 235 million . for 2009 , net cash flows used for financing activities included net pro- ceeds from the issuance of $ 500 million in long-term debt and the net repayment of debt and reverse repurchase agreements of $ 466 million . both internal and external forces influence our financial condition , results of operations , and cash flows . claim settle- ments , premium levels , and investment returns may be impacted by changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions . in many cases , significant periods of time , ranging up to several years or more , may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss , the reporting of the loss to us , and the settlement of the liability for that loss . from time to time , we utilize reverse repurchase agreements as a low-cost alternative for short-term funding needs . we use these instruments on a limited basis to address short-term cash timing differences without disrupting our investment portfolio holdings and settle the transactions with future operating cash flows . at december 31 , 2010 , there were $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding ( refer to short-term debt ) . in addition to cash from operations , routine sales of investments , and financing arrangements , we have agreements with a bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs to enhance cash management efficiency during periods of short-term timing mismatches between expected inflows and outflows of cash by currency . in each program , participating ace entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider and each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency ( u.s . dollars ) and then notionally pooled . the bank extends overdraft credit to any participating ace entity as needed , provided that the overall notionally-pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero . actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not co-mingled between legal entities . ace entities may incur overdraft balances as a means to address short-term timing mismatches , and any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ace entity would be guaranteed by ace limited ( up to $ 150 million in the aggregate ) . our revolving credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ace entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool . capital resources capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations . the following table summarizes the components of our capital resources at december 31 , 2010 , and 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term debt</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>3358</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>4658</td><td>3319</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>309</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>22974</td><td>19667</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capitalization</td><td>$ 27941</td><td>$ 23295</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ratio of debt to total capitalization</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>14.2% ( 14.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ratio of debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization</td><td>17.8% ( 17.8 % )</td><td>15.6% ( 15.6 % )</td></tr></table> our ratios of debt to total capitalization and debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization have increased temporarily due to the increase in short-term debt , as discussed below . we expect that these ratios will decline over the next six to nine months as we repay the short-term debt . we believe our financial strength provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain available funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis . our ability to access the capital markets is dependent on , among other things , market conditions and our perceived financial strength . we have accessed both the debt and equity markets from time to time. .
Question: what was the value of total debt in 2010?
Answer: 4658.0
Question: what was total shareholder equity in 2010?
Answer: 22974.0
Question: what is the sum of debt and equity?
Answer: 27632.0
Question: what is the value of debt of the sum of debt and equity?
| 0.16857 |
CONVFINQA5675 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the last year for which there was still information about the performance of the s&p 500?
| 2013.0 |
CONVFINQA5676 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the last year for which there was still information about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 2013.0
Question: and what was the first year?
| 2008.0 |
CONVFINQA5677 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the last year for which there was still information about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 2013.0
Question: and what was the first year?
Answer: 2008.0
Question: for how many years, then, there was information available about the performance of the s&p 500?
| 5.0 |
CONVFINQA5678 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the last year for which there was still information about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 2013.0
Question: and what was the first year?
Answer: 2008.0
Question: for how many years, then, there was information available about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what was the value of that stock in 2013?
| 204.63 |
CONVFINQA5679 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the last year for which there was still information about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 2013.0
Question: and what was the first year?
Answer: 2008.0
Question: for how many years, then, there was information available about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what was the value of that stock in 2013?
Answer: 204.63
Question: and what was the change in the value of that stock from 2008 to 2013?
| 104.63 |
CONVFINQA5680 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the last year for which there was still information about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 2013.0
Question: and what was the first year?
Answer: 2008.0
Question: for how many years, then, there was information available about the performance of the s&p 500?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what was the value of that stock in 2013?
Answer: 204.63
Question: and what was the change in the value of that stock from 2008 to 2013?
Answer: 104.63
Question: considering the five year period of this change, what then was its annual average?
| 20.926 |
CONVFINQA5681 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. .
Question: what is the net change in property plant and equipment subject to capital leases from 2014 to 2015?
| -70.0 |
CONVFINQA5682 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. .
Question: what is the net change in property plant and equipment subject to capital leases from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -70.0
Question: what is the balance of capital lease related to aircrafts in 2015?
| 2289.0 |
CONVFINQA5683 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. .
Question: what is the net change in property plant and equipment subject to capital leases from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -70.0
Question: what is the balance of capital lease related to aircrafts in 2015?
Answer: 2289.0
Question: what about in 2014?
| 2289.0 |
CONVFINQA5684 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. .
Question: what is the net change in property plant and equipment subject to capital leases from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -70.0
Question: what is the balance of capital lease related to aircrafts in 2015?
Answer: 2289.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 2289.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 0.0 |
CONVFINQA5685 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 320078</td><td>$ 302341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stable value protection</td><td>24906</td><td>33512</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>4685</td><td>5063</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4612</td><td>4552</td></tr></table> indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what was the net change in value of indemnified securities financing from 2012 to 2013?
| 17737.0 |
CONVFINQA5686 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 320078</td><td>$ 302341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stable value protection</td><td>24906</td><td>33512</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>4685</td><td>5063</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4612</td><td>4552</td></tr></table> indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what was the net change in value of indemnified securities financing from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 17737.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
| 302341.0 |
CONVFINQA5687 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 320078</td><td>$ 302341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stable value protection</td><td>24906</td><td>33512</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>4685</td><td>5063</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4612</td><td>4552</td></tr></table> indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what was the net change in value of indemnified securities financing from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 17737.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
Answer: 302341.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2012 value?
| 0.05867 |
CONVFINQA5688 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014 factors affecting sources of liquidity . 201d recent sales of unregistered securities during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 4670335 shares of our class a common stock upon conversion of $ 57.1 million principal amount of our 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes . pursuant to the terms of the indenture , the holders of the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes received 81.808 shares of class a common stock for every $ 1000 principal amount of notes converted . the shares were issued to the noteholders in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . in connection with the conversion , we paid such holders an aggregate of $ 4.9 million , calculated based on the accrued and unpaid interest on the notes and the discounted value of the future interest payments on the notes . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon conversions of additional 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 398412 shares of our class a common stock upon exercises of 55729 warrants assumed in our merger with spectrasite , inc . in august 2005 , in connection with our merger with spectrasite , inc. , we assumed approximately 1.0 million warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase 7.15 shares of class a common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . net proceeds from these warrant exercises were approximately $ 1.8 million . the shares of class a common stock issued to the warrantholders upon exercise of the warrants were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon exercises of additional warrants , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d issuer purchases of equity securities in november 2005 , we announced that our board of directors had approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock through december 2006 . during the fourth quarter of 2005 , we repurchased 2836519 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 76.6 million pursuant to our stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>11/17/05 2013 11/30/05</td><td>874306</td><td>$ 26.25</td><td>874306</td><td>$ 727.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>12/1/05 2013 12/31/05</td><td>1962213</td><td>$ 27.29</td><td>1962213</td><td>$ 673.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>2836519</td><td>$ 26.97</td><td>2836519</td><td>$ 673.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) all issuer repurchases were made pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced in november 2005 . pursuant to the program , we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock during the period november 2005 through december 2006 . under the program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we entered into a trading plan under rule 10b5-1 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self- imposed trading blackout periods . the program may be discontinued at any time . since december 31 , 2005 , we have continued to repurchase shares of our class a common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program . between january 1 , 2006 and march 9 , 2006 , we repurchased 3.9 million shares of class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 117.4 million pursuant to the stock repurchase program. .
Question: what is the number of shares repurchased times the average price paid per share in november 2005?
| 22950532.5 |
CONVFINQA5689 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014 factors affecting sources of liquidity . 201d recent sales of unregistered securities during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 4670335 shares of our class a common stock upon conversion of $ 57.1 million principal amount of our 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes . pursuant to the terms of the indenture , the holders of the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes received 81.808 shares of class a common stock for every $ 1000 principal amount of notes converted . the shares were issued to the noteholders in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . in connection with the conversion , we paid such holders an aggregate of $ 4.9 million , calculated based on the accrued and unpaid interest on the notes and the discounted value of the future interest payments on the notes . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon conversions of additional 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 398412 shares of our class a common stock upon exercises of 55729 warrants assumed in our merger with spectrasite , inc . in august 2005 , in connection with our merger with spectrasite , inc. , we assumed approximately 1.0 million warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase 7.15 shares of class a common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . net proceeds from these warrant exercises were approximately $ 1.8 million . the shares of class a common stock issued to the warrantholders upon exercise of the warrants were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon exercises of additional warrants , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d issuer purchases of equity securities in november 2005 , we announced that our board of directors had approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock through december 2006 . during the fourth quarter of 2005 , we repurchased 2836519 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 76.6 million pursuant to our stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>11/17/05 2013 11/30/05</td><td>874306</td><td>$ 26.25</td><td>874306</td><td>$ 727.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>12/1/05 2013 12/31/05</td><td>1962213</td><td>$ 27.29</td><td>1962213</td><td>$ 673.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>2836519</td><td>$ 26.97</td><td>2836519</td><td>$ 673.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) all issuer repurchases were made pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced in november 2005 . pursuant to the program , we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock during the period november 2005 through december 2006 . under the program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we entered into a trading plan under rule 10b5-1 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self- imposed trading blackout periods . the program may be discontinued at any time . since december 31 , 2005 , we have continued to repurchase shares of our class a common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program . between january 1 , 2006 and march 9 , 2006 , we repurchased 3.9 million shares of class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 117.4 million pursuant to the stock repurchase program. .
Question: what is the number of shares repurchased times the average price paid per share in november 2005?
Answer: 22950532.5
Question: now, what is that numbered divided by 1,000,000?
| 22.95053 |
CONVFINQA5690 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on previously held equity interest on 30 december 2014 , we acquired our partner 2019s equity ownership interest in a liquefied atmospheric industrial gases production joint venture in north america for $ 22.6 , which increased our ownership from 50% ( 50 % ) to 100% ( 100 % ) . the transaction was accounted for as a business combination , and subsequent to the acquisition , the results were consolidated within our industrial gases 2013 americas segment . we recorded a gain of $ 17.9 ( $ 11.2 after-tax , or $ .05 per share ) as a result of revaluing our previously held equity interest to fair value as of the acquisition date . refer to note 6 , business combination , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . other income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities . the detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements . 2017 vs . 2016 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 121.0 increased $ 71.6 , primarily due to income from transition services agreements with versum and evonik , income from the sale of assets and investments , including a gain of $ 12.2 ( $ 7.6 after-tax , or $ .03 per share ) resulting from the sale of a parcel of land , and a favorable foreign exchange impact . 2016 vs . 2015 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 49.4 increased $ 3.9 , primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses , favorable contract settlements , and receipt of a government subsidy . fiscal year 2015 included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land . no other individual items were significant in comparison to fiscal year 2015 . interest expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest incurred</td><td>$ 139.6</td><td>$ 147.9</td><td>$ 151.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>19.0</td><td>32.7</td><td>49.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 120.6</td><td>$ 115.2</td><td>$ 102.8</td></tr></table> 2017 vs . 2016 interest incurred decreased $ 8.3 as the impact from a lower average debt balance of $ 26 was partially offset by the impact from a higher average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 19 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our decision to exit from the energy-from-waste business . 2016 vs . 2015 interest incurred decreased $ 4.0 . the decrease primarily resulted from a stronger u.s . dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 6 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 2 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our exit from the energy-from-waste business . other non-operating income ( expense ) , net other non-operating income ( expense ) , net of $ 29.0 in fiscal year 2017 primarily resulted from interest income on cash and time deposits , which are comprised primarily of proceeds from the sale of pmd . interest income was included in "other income ( expense ) , net" in 2016 and 2015 . interest income in previous periods was not material . loss on extinguishment of debt on 30 september 2016 , in anticipation of the spin-off of emd , versum issued $ 425.0 of notes to air products , who then exchanged these notes with certain financial institutions for $ 418.3 of air products 2019 outstanding commercial paper . this noncash exchange , which was excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows , resulted in a loss of $ 6.9 ( $ 4.3 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) . in september 2015 , we made a payment of $ 146.6 to redeem 3000000 unidades de fomento ( 201cuf 201d ) series e 6.30% ( 6.30 % ) bonds due 22 january 2030 that had a carrying value of $ 130.0 and resulted in a net loss of $ 16.6 ( $ 14.2 after-tax , or $ .07 per share ) . .
Question: what was the change observed in the capitalized interest from 2015 to 2016?
| -16.4 |
CONVFINQA5691 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on previously held equity interest on 30 december 2014 , we acquired our partner 2019s equity ownership interest in a liquefied atmospheric industrial gases production joint venture in north america for $ 22.6 , which increased our ownership from 50% ( 50 % ) to 100% ( 100 % ) . the transaction was accounted for as a business combination , and subsequent to the acquisition , the results were consolidated within our industrial gases 2013 americas segment . we recorded a gain of $ 17.9 ( $ 11.2 after-tax , or $ .05 per share ) as a result of revaluing our previously held equity interest to fair value as of the acquisition date . refer to note 6 , business combination , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . other income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities . the detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements . 2017 vs . 2016 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 121.0 increased $ 71.6 , primarily due to income from transition services agreements with versum and evonik , income from the sale of assets and investments , including a gain of $ 12.2 ( $ 7.6 after-tax , or $ .03 per share ) resulting from the sale of a parcel of land , and a favorable foreign exchange impact . 2016 vs . 2015 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 49.4 increased $ 3.9 , primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses , favorable contract settlements , and receipt of a government subsidy . fiscal year 2015 included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land . no other individual items were significant in comparison to fiscal year 2015 . interest expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest incurred</td><td>$ 139.6</td><td>$ 147.9</td><td>$ 151.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>19.0</td><td>32.7</td><td>49.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 120.6</td><td>$ 115.2</td><td>$ 102.8</td></tr></table> 2017 vs . 2016 interest incurred decreased $ 8.3 as the impact from a lower average debt balance of $ 26 was partially offset by the impact from a higher average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 19 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our decision to exit from the energy-from-waste business . 2016 vs . 2015 interest incurred decreased $ 4.0 . the decrease primarily resulted from a stronger u.s . dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 6 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 2 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our exit from the energy-from-waste business . other non-operating income ( expense ) , net other non-operating income ( expense ) , net of $ 29.0 in fiscal year 2017 primarily resulted from interest income on cash and time deposits , which are comprised primarily of proceeds from the sale of pmd . interest income was included in "other income ( expense ) , net" in 2016 and 2015 . interest income in previous periods was not material . loss on extinguishment of debt on 30 september 2016 , in anticipation of the spin-off of emd , versum issued $ 425.0 of notes to air products , who then exchanged these notes with certain financial institutions for $ 418.3 of air products 2019 outstanding commercial paper . this noncash exchange , which was excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows , resulted in a loss of $ 6.9 ( $ 4.3 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) . in september 2015 , we made a payment of $ 146.6 to redeem 3000000 unidades de fomento ( 201cuf 201d ) series e 6.30% ( 6.30 % ) bonds due 22 january 2030 that had a carrying value of $ 130.0 and resulted in a net loss of $ 16.6 ( $ 14.2 after-tax , or $ .07 per share ) . .
Question: what was the change observed in the capitalized interest from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -16.4
Question: and what was that capitalized interest in 2015?
| 49.1 |
CONVFINQA5692 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on previously held equity interest on 30 december 2014 , we acquired our partner 2019s equity ownership interest in a liquefied atmospheric industrial gases production joint venture in north america for $ 22.6 , which increased our ownership from 50% ( 50 % ) to 100% ( 100 % ) . the transaction was accounted for as a business combination , and subsequent to the acquisition , the results were consolidated within our industrial gases 2013 americas segment . we recorded a gain of $ 17.9 ( $ 11.2 after-tax , or $ .05 per share ) as a result of revaluing our previously held equity interest to fair value as of the acquisition date . refer to note 6 , business combination , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . other income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities . the detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements . 2017 vs . 2016 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 121.0 increased $ 71.6 , primarily due to income from transition services agreements with versum and evonik , income from the sale of assets and investments , including a gain of $ 12.2 ( $ 7.6 after-tax , or $ .03 per share ) resulting from the sale of a parcel of land , and a favorable foreign exchange impact . 2016 vs . 2015 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 49.4 increased $ 3.9 , primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses , favorable contract settlements , and receipt of a government subsidy . fiscal year 2015 included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land . no other individual items were significant in comparison to fiscal year 2015 . interest expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest incurred</td><td>$ 139.6</td><td>$ 147.9</td><td>$ 151.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>19.0</td><td>32.7</td><td>49.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 120.6</td><td>$ 115.2</td><td>$ 102.8</td></tr></table> 2017 vs . 2016 interest incurred decreased $ 8.3 as the impact from a lower average debt balance of $ 26 was partially offset by the impact from a higher average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 19 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our decision to exit from the energy-from-waste business . 2016 vs . 2015 interest incurred decreased $ 4.0 . the decrease primarily resulted from a stronger u.s . dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 6 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 2 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our exit from the energy-from-waste business . other non-operating income ( expense ) , net other non-operating income ( expense ) , net of $ 29.0 in fiscal year 2017 primarily resulted from interest income on cash and time deposits , which are comprised primarily of proceeds from the sale of pmd . interest income was included in "other income ( expense ) , net" in 2016 and 2015 . interest income in previous periods was not material . loss on extinguishment of debt on 30 september 2016 , in anticipation of the spin-off of emd , versum issued $ 425.0 of notes to air products , who then exchanged these notes with certain financial institutions for $ 418.3 of air products 2019 outstanding commercial paper . this noncash exchange , which was excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows , resulted in a loss of $ 6.9 ( $ 4.3 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) . in september 2015 , we made a payment of $ 146.6 to redeem 3000000 unidades de fomento ( 201cuf 201d ) series e 6.30% ( 6.30 % ) bonds due 22 january 2030 that had a carrying value of $ 130.0 and resulted in a net loss of $ 16.6 ( $ 14.2 after-tax , or $ .07 per share ) . .
Question: what was the change observed in the capitalized interest from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -16.4
Question: and what was that capitalized interest in 2015?
Answer: 49.1
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2015 capitalized interest?
| -0.33401 |
CONVFINQA5693 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what the value of the investment in ups in 2012?
| 140.54 |
CONVFINQA5694 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what the value of the investment in ups in 2012?
Answer: 140.54
Question: what about in 2010?
| 130.29 |
CONVFINQA5695 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what the value of the investment in ups in 2012?
Answer: 140.54
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 130.29
Question: what is the net change in value of this investment?
| 10.25 |
CONVFINQA5696 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what the value of the investment in ups in 2012?
Answer: 140.54
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 130.29
Question: what is the net change in value of this investment?
Answer: 10.25
Question: what roi does this represent?
| 0.07867 |
CONVFINQA5697 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: for the two year period ended in 2014, what was the full long-term debt?
| 2753.3 |
CONVFINQA5698 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: for the two year period ended in 2014, what was the full long-term debt?
Answer: 2753.3
Question: and what was the total debt?
| 3395.3 |
CONVFINQA5699 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: for the two year period ended in 2014, what was the full long-term debt?
Answer: 2753.3
Question: and what was the total debt?
Answer: 3395.3
Question: how much, then, did the long-term debt represent as a portion of the total?
| 0.81092 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.