id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA5900 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the net change in common share repurchases from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 1538.0
Question: what was the cost of share repurchases in 2012?
| 4637.0 |
CONVFINQA5901 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the net change in common share repurchases from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 1538.0
Question: what was the cost of share repurchases in 2012?
Answer: 4637.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2012 value?
| 0.33168 |
CONVFINQA5902 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the end of 2018?
| 230.0 |
CONVFINQA5903 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the end of 2018?
Answer: 230.0
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
| 278.0 |
CONVFINQA5904 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the end of 2018?
Answer: 230.0
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
Answer: 278.0
Question: what was the net change in 2018?
| -48.0 |
CONVFINQA5905 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the end of 2018?
Answer: 230.0
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
Answer: 278.0
Question: what was the net change in 2018?
Answer: -48.0
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
| 278.0 |
CONVFINQA5906 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the end of 2018?
Answer: 230.0
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
Answer: 278.0
Question: what was the net change in 2018?
Answer: -48.0
Question: what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
Answer: 278.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.17266 |
CONVFINQA5907 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . the company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through december 31 , 2010 . 12 . stock-based compensation the company recognized stock-based compensation of $ 52.6 million , $ 60.7 million and $ 54.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 included $ 6.9 million related to the modification of the vesting and exercise terms for certain employee 2019s equity awards . the company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . summary of stock-based compensation plans 2014the company maintains equity incentive plans that provide for the grant of stock-based awards to its directors , officers and employees . under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant . equity awards typically vest ratably over various periods , generally four years , and generally expire ten years from the date of grant . stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan . the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below . the risk-free treasury rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield in effect at the accounting measurement date . the expected life ( estimated period of time outstanding ) was estimated using the vesting term and historical exercise behavior of company employees . the expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the stock options . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.39% ( 2.39 % )</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.04% ( 2.04 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % ) 2013 3.05% ( 3.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.35% ( 2.35 % )</td><td>1.71% ( 1.71 % )</td><td>1.89% ( 1.89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4.60 years</td><td>4.00 years</td><td>4.00 years</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.11% ( 37.11 % ) 2013 37.48% ( 37.48 % )</td><td>36.00% ( 36.00 % ) 2013 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % ) 2013 35.30% ( 35.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.14% ( 37.14 % )</td><td>36.23% ( 36.23 % )</td><td>29.10% ( 29.10 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively . the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $ 27.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company realized approximately $ 0.3 million of state tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. .
Question: what was the change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2007 to 2008?
| -59.0 |
CONVFINQA5908 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . the company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through december 31 , 2010 . 12 . stock-based compensation the company recognized stock-based compensation of $ 52.6 million , $ 60.7 million and $ 54.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 included $ 6.9 million related to the modification of the vesting and exercise terms for certain employee 2019s equity awards . the company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . summary of stock-based compensation plans 2014the company maintains equity incentive plans that provide for the grant of stock-based awards to its directors , officers and employees . under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant . equity awards typically vest ratably over various periods , generally four years , and generally expire ten years from the date of grant . stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan . the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below . the risk-free treasury rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield in effect at the accounting measurement date . the expected life ( estimated period of time outstanding ) was estimated using the vesting term and historical exercise behavior of company employees . the expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the stock options . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.39% ( 2.39 % )</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.04% ( 2.04 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % ) 2013 3.05% ( 3.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.35% ( 2.35 % )</td><td>1.71% ( 1.71 % )</td><td>1.89% ( 1.89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4.60 years</td><td>4.00 years</td><td>4.00 years</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.11% ( 37.11 % ) 2013 37.48% ( 37.48 % )</td><td>36.00% ( 36.00 % ) 2013 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % ) 2013 35.30% ( 35.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.14% ( 37.14 % )</td><td>36.23% ( 36.23 % )</td><td>29.10% ( 29.10 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively . the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $ 27.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company realized approximately $ 0.3 million of state tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. .
Question: what was the change in the intrinsic value of stock options from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: -59.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the intrinsic value of stock options in 2007, in percentage?
| -0.59536 |
CONVFINQA5909 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the 2018 carrying amount?
| 556.0 |
CONVFINQA5910 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the 2018 carrying amount?
Answer: 556.0
Question: what was it in 2017?
| 426.0 |
CONVFINQA5911 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the 2018 carrying amount?
Answer: 556.0
Question: what was it in 2017?
Answer: 426.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| 130.0 |
CONVFINQA5912 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the 2018 carrying amount?
Answer: 556.0
Question: what was it in 2017?
Answer: 426.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 130.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2017 value?
| 0.30516 |
CONVFINQA5913 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: as of january 2016, what was the amount equivalent to an annual interest rate of to the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) note issued, in millions?
| 13.0 |
CONVFINQA5914 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: as of january 2016, what was the amount equivalent to an annual interest rate of to the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) note issued, in millions?
Answer: 13.0
Question: and what was that amount for the 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) note issued?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA5915 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: as of january 2016, what was the amount equivalent to an annual interest rate of to the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) note issued, in millions?
Answer: 13.0
Question: and what was that amount for the 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) note issued?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the total annual interest expense combining both notes?
| 21.0 |
CONVFINQA5916 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k contractual obligations the company has entered into contracts with various third parties in the normal course of business which will require future payments . the following table illustrates the company 2019s contractual obligations : 2006 2008 2010 and and and contractual obligations total 2005 2007 2009 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>total</td><td>2005</td><td>2006 and 2007</td><td>2008 and 2009</td><td>2010 and thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt obligations</td><td>$ 651.5</td><td>$ 27.5</td><td>$ 449.0</td><td>$ 175.0</td><td>$ 2013</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases</td><td>103.0</td><td>23.5</td><td>34.2</td><td>17.7</td><td>27.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>16.1</td><td>15.5</td><td>0.6</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>420.9</td><td>2013</td><td>135.7</td><td>30.5</td><td>254.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 1191.5</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 619.5</td><td>$ 223.2</td><td>$ 282.3</td></tr></table> critical accounting estimates the financial results of the company are affected by the adequate provisions exist for income taxes for all periods and selection and application of accounting policies and methods . jurisdictions subject to review or audit . significant accounting policies which require management 2019s commitments and contingencies 2013 accruals for judgment are discussed below . product liability and other claims are established with excess inventory and instruments 2013 the company internal and external legal counsel based on current must determine as of each balance sheet date how much , if information and historical settlement information for claims , any , of its inventory may ultimately prove to be unsaleable or related fees and for claims incurred but not reported . an unsaleable at its carrying cost . similarly , the company must actuarial model is used by the company to assist also determine if instruments on hand will be put to management in determining an appropriate level of accruals productive use or remain undeployed as a result of excess for product liability claims . historical patterns of claim loss supply . reserves are established to effectively adjust development over time are statistically analyzed to arrive at inventory and instruments to net realizable value . to factors which are then applied to loss estimates in the determine the appropriate level of reserves , the company actuarial model . the amounts established represent evaluates current stock levels in relation to historical and management 2019s best estimate of the ultimate costs that it will expected patterns of demand for all of its products and incur under the various contingencies . instrument systems and components . the basis for the goodwill and intangible assets 2013 the company determination is generally the same for all inventory and evaluates the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite life instrument items and categories except for work-in-progress intangible assets annually , or whenever events or inventory , which is recorded at cost . obsolete or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be discontinued items are generally destroyed and completely recoverable . the company evaluates the carrying value of written off . management evaluates the need for changes to finite life intangible assets whenever events or circumstances valuation reserves based on market conditions , competitive indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable . offerings and other factors on a regular basis . significant assumptions are required to estimate the fair income taxes 2013 the company estimates income tax value of goodwill and intangible assets , most notably expense and income tax liabilities and assets by taxable estimated future cash flows generated by these assets . jurisdiction . realization of deferred tax assets in each taxable changes to these assumptions could result in the company jurisdiction is dependent on the company 2019s ability to being required to record impairment charges on these assets . generate future taxable income sufficient to realize the benefits . the company evaluates deferred tax assets on an recent accounting pronouncements ongoing basis and provides valuation allowances if it is information about recent accounting pronouncements is determined to be 2018 2018more likely than not 2019 2019 that the deferred tax included in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements , benefit will not be realized . federal income taxes are which are included herein under item 8 . provided on the portion of the income of foreign subsidiaries that is expected to be remitted to the u.s . the company operates within numerous taxing jurisdictions . the company is subject to regulatory review or audit in virtually all of those jurisdictions and those reviews and audits may require extended periods of time to resolve . the company makes use of all available information and makes reasoned judgments regarding matters requiring interpretation in establishing tax expense , liabilities and reserves . the company believes .
Question: what percentage of debt obligations are due in 2005?
| 0.04221 |
CONVFINQA5917 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k contractual obligations the company has entered into contracts with various third parties in the normal course of business which will require future payments . the following table illustrates the company 2019s contractual obligations : 2006 2008 2010 and and and contractual obligations total 2005 2007 2009 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>total</td><td>2005</td><td>2006 and 2007</td><td>2008 and 2009</td><td>2010 and thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt obligations</td><td>$ 651.5</td><td>$ 27.5</td><td>$ 449.0</td><td>$ 175.0</td><td>$ 2013</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases</td><td>103.0</td><td>23.5</td><td>34.2</td><td>17.7</td><td>27.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>16.1</td><td>15.5</td><td>0.6</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>420.9</td><td>2013</td><td>135.7</td><td>30.5</td><td>254.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 1191.5</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 619.5</td><td>$ 223.2</td><td>$ 282.3</td></tr></table> critical accounting estimates the financial results of the company are affected by the adequate provisions exist for income taxes for all periods and selection and application of accounting policies and methods . jurisdictions subject to review or audit . significant accounting policies which require management 2019s commitments and contingencies 2013 accruals for judgment are discussed below . product liability and other claims are established with excess inventory and instruments 2013 the company internal and external legal counsel based on current must determine as of each balance sheet date how much , if information and historical settlement information for claims , any , of its inventory may ultimately prove to be unsaleable or related fees and for claims incurred but not reported . an unsaleable at its carrying cost . similarly , the company must actuarial model is used by the company to assist also determine if instruments on hand will be put to management in determining an appropriate level of accruals productive use or remain undeployed as a result of excess for product liability claims . historical patterns of claim loss supply . reserves are established to effectively adjust development over time are statistically analyzed to arrive at inventory and instruments to net realizable value . to factors which are then applied to loss estimates in the determine the appropriate level of reserves , the company actuarial model . the amounts established represent evaluates current stock levels in relation to historical and management 2019s best estimate of the ultimate costs that it will expected patterns of demand for all of its products and incur under the various contingencies . instrument systems and components . the basis for the goodwill and intangible assets 2013 the company determination is generally the same for all inventory and evaluates the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite life instrument items and categories except for work-in-progress intangible assets annually , or whenever events or inventory , which is recorded at cost . obsolete or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be discontinued items are generally destroyed and completely recoverable . the company evaluates the carrying value of written off . management evaluates the need for changes to finite life intangible assets whenever events or circumstances valuation reserves based on market conditions , competitive indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable . offerings and other factors on a regular basis . significant assumptions are required to estimate the fair income taxes 2013 the company estimates income tax value of goodwill and intangible assets , most notably expense and income tax liabilities and assets by taxable estimated future cash flows generated by these assets . jurisdiction . realization of deferred tax assets in each taxable changes to these assumptions could result in the company jurisdiction is dependent on the company 2019s ability to being required to record impairment charges on these assets . generate future taxable income sufficient to realize the benefits . the company evaluates deferred tax assets on an recent accounting pronouncements ongoing basis and provides valuation allowances if it is information about recent accounting pronouncements is determined to be 2018 2018more likely than not 2019 2019 that the deferred tax included in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements , benefit will not be realized . federal income taxes are which are included herein under item 8 . provided on the portion of the income of foreign subsidiaries that is expected to be remitted to the u.s . the company operates within numerous taxing jurisdictions . the company is subject to regulatory review or audit in virtually all of those jurisdictions and those reviews and audits may require extended periods of time to resolve . the company makes use of all available information and makes reasoned judgments regarding matters requiring interpretation in establishing tax expense , liabilities and reserves . the company believes .
Question: what percentage of debt obligations are due in 2005?
Answer: 0.04221
Question: and the percentage that are due in 2006 and 2007?
| 0.68918 |
CONVFINQA5918 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. .
Question: what was the change in the adjusted ebitda from 2014 to 2015?
| 111.5 |
CONVFINQA5919 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. .
Question: what was the change in the adjusted ebitda from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 111.5
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that adjusted ebitda in 2014?
| 0.12293 |
CONVFINQA5920 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements loss on retirement of long-term obligations 2014loss on retirement of long-term obligations primarily includes cash paid to retire debt in excess of its carrying value , cash paid to holders of convertible notes in connection with note conversions and non-cash charges related to the write-off of deferred financing fees . loss on retirement of long-term obligations also includes gains from repurchasing or refinancing certain of the company 2019s debt obligations . earnings per common share 2014basic and diluted 2014basic income from continuing operations per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 represents income from continuing operations attributable to american tower corporation divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period . diluted income from continuing operations per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 represents income from continuing operations attributable to american tower corporation divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and any dilutive common share equivalents , including unvested restricted stock , shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants as determined under the treasury stock method and upon conversion of the company 2019s convertible notes , as determined under the if-converted method . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . the company 2019s matching contribution for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 is 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the company contributed approximately $ 4.4 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.9 million to the plan , respectively . 2 . prepaid and other current assets prepaid and other current assets consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>prepaid income tax</td><td>$ 57665</td><td>$ 31384</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prepaid operating ground leases</td><td>56916</td><td>49585</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>value added tax and other consumption tax receivables</td><td>22443</td><td>81276</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid assets</td><td>19037</td><td>28031</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other miscellaneous current assets</td><td>66790</td><td>59997</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 222851</td><td>$ 250273</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) december 31 , 2011 balances have been revised to reflect purchase accounting measurement period adjustments. .
Question: what was the sum of prepaid income and value added tax and other consumption tax receivables in 2011?
| 112660.0 |
CONVFINQA5921 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements loss on retirement of long-term obligations 2014loss on retirement of long-term obligations primarily includes cash paid to retire debt in excess of its carrying value , cash paid to holders of convertible notes in connection with note conversions and non-cash charges related to the write-off of deferred financing fees . loss on retirement of long-term obligations also includes gains from repurchasing or refinancing certain of the company 2019s debt obligations . earnings per common share 2014basic and diluted 2014basic income from continuing operations per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 represents income from continuing operations attributable to american tower corporation divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period . diluted income from continuing operations per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 represents income from continuing operations attributable to american tower corporation divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and any dilutive common share equivalents , including unvested restricted stock , shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants as determined under the treasury stock method and upon conversion of the company 2019s convertible notes , as determined under the if-converted method . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . the company 2019s matching contribution for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 is 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the company contributed approximately $ 4.4 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.9 million to the plan , respectively . 2 . prepaid and other current assets prepaid and other current assets consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>prepaid income tax</td><td>$ 57665</td><td>$ 31384</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prepaid operating ground leases</td><td>56916</td><td>49585</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>value added tax and other consumption tax receivables</td><td>22443</td><td>81276</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid assets</td><td>19037</td><td>28031</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other miscellaneous current assets</td><td>66790</td><td>59997</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 222851</td><td>$ 250273</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) december 31 , 2011 balances have been revised to reflect purchase accounting measurement period adjustments. .
Question: what was the sum of prepaid income and value added tax and other consumption tax receivables in 2011?
Answer: 112660.0
Question: what then is the percent of tax related assets over the total balance at the end of 2011?
| 0.45015 |
CONVFINQA5922 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what is the sum of the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements for the years of 2016 and 2017?
| 275.6 |
CONVFINQA5923 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what is the sum of the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements for the years of 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 275.6
Question: what was the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements in 2015?
| 137.7 |
CONVFINQA5924 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what is the sum of the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements for the years of 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 275.6
Question: what was the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements in 2015?
Answer: 137.7
Question: what is the sum of these 3 years?
| 413.3 |
CONVFINQA5925 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for payments of interest and dividends , new loans originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 8 , 2013 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , baa1 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2012 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1079.8 million increased $ 132.9 million from $ 946.9 million at 2011 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2012 and 2011 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 214.5</td><td>$ 185.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net</td><td>497.9</td><td>463.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>finance receivables 2013 net</td><td>323.1</td><td>277.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contract receivables 2013 net</td><td>62.7</td><td>49.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories 2013 net</td><td>404.2</td><td>386.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current assets</td><td>166.6</td><td>168.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1669.0</td><td>1530.7</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>notes payable</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>-16.2 ( 16.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-142.5 ( 142.5 )</td><td>-124.6 ( 124.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-441.5 ( 441.5 )</td><td>-443.0 ( 443.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-589.2 ( 589.2 )</td><td>-583.8 ( 583.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 1079.8</td><td>$ 946.9</td></tr></table> cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million as of 2012 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 185.6 million at 2011 year end . the $ 28.9 million increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 329.3 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 73.0 million of cash contributions ( including $ 54.7 million of discretionary contributions ) to the company 2019s domestic pension plans ; ( ii ) $ 445.5 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( iii ) $ 46.8 million of proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 27.0 million of cash proceeds from the sale of a non-strategic equity investment at book value . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were partially offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 569.6 million of new finance originations ; ( ii ) dividend payments of $ 81.5 million ; ( iii ) the funding of $ 79.4 million of capital expenditures ; and ( iv ) the repurchase of 1180000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 78.1 million . of the $ 214.5 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2012 year end , $ 81.4 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 44 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what was the percentage change in working capital in 2012 compared to 2011?
| 0.14035 |
CONVFINQA5926 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for payments of interest and dividends , new loans originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 8 , 2013 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , baa1 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2012 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1079.8 million increased $ 132.9 million from $ 946.9 million at 2011 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2012 and 2011 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 214.5</td><td>$ 185.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net</td><td>497.9</td><td>463.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>finance receivables 2013 net</td><td>323.1</td><td>277.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contract receivables 2013 net</td><td>62.7</td><td>49.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories 2013 net</td><td>404.2</td><td>386.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current assets</td><td>166.6</td><td>168.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1669.0</td><td>1530.7</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>notes payable</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>-16.2 ( 16.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-142.5 ( 142.5 )</td><td>-124.6 ( 124.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-441.5 ( 441.5 )</td><td>-443.0 ( 443.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-589.2 ( 589.2 )</td><td>-583.8 ( 583.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 1079.8</td><td>$ 946.9</td></tr></table> cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million as of 2012 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 185.6 million at 2011 year end . the $ 28.9 million increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 329.3 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 73.0 million of cash contributions ( including $ 54.7 million of discretionary contributions ) to the company 2019s domestic pension plans ; ( ii ) $ 445.5 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( iii ) $ 46.8 million of proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 27.0 million of cash proceeds from the sale of a non-strategic equity investment at book value . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were partially offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 569.6 million of new finance originations ; ( ii ) dividend payments of $ 81.5 million ; ( iii ) the funding of $ 79.4 million of capital expenditures ; and ( iv ) the repurchase of 1180000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 78.1 million . of the $ 214.5 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2012 year end , $ 81.4 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 44 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what was the percentage change in working capital in 2012 compared to 2011?
Answer: 0.14035
Question: what portion of cash and cash equivalents was held outside the us as of 2012?
| 0.37949 |
CONVFINQA5927 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2015?
| 1681.0 |
CONVFINQA5928 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2015?
Answer: 1681.0
Question: what was the operating profit in 2014?
| 1649.0 |
CONVFINQA5929 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2015?
Answer: 1681.0
Question: what was the operating profit in 2014?
Answer: 1649.0
Question: what is the sum for 2014 and 2015?
| 3330.0 |
CONVFINQA5930 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2015?
Answer: 1681.0
Question: what was the operating profit in 2014?
Answer: 1649.0
Question: what is the sum for 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 3330.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2103?
| 1612.0 |
CONVFINQA5931 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2015?
Answer: 1681.0
Question: what was the operating profit in 2014?
Answer: 1649.0
Question: what is the sum for 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 3330.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2103?
Answer: 1612.0
Question: what is the total sum?
| 4942.0 |
CONVFINQA5932 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2015?
Answer: 1681.0
Question: what was the operating profit in 2014?
Answer: 1649.0
Question: what is the sum for 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 3330.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2103?
Answer: 1612.0
Question: what is the total sum?
Answer: 4942.0
Question: what is the total sum divided by 3?
| 1647.33333 |
CONVFINQA5933 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , $ 2.1 billion for 2012 , and $ 2.2 billion for 2011 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2013</td><td>dec . 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 803</td><td>$ 825</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>491</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>385</td><td>376</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>356</td><td>318</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>207</td><td>213</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>169</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>96</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>579</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3086</td><td>$ 2923</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013 and 2012?
| 4.4 |
CONVFINQA5934 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , $ 2.1 billion for 2012 , and $ 2.2 billion for 2011 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2013</td><td>dec . 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 803</td><td>$ 825</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>491</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>385</td><td>376</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>356</td><td>318</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>207</td><td>213</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>169</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>96</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>579</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3086</td><td>$ 2923</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013 and 2012?
Answer: 4.4
Question: what about the total including 2011?
| 6.6 |
CONVFINQA5935 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , $ 2.1 billion for 2012 , and $ 2.2 billion for 2011 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2013</td><td>dec . 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 803</td><td>$ 825</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>491</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>385</td><td>376</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>356</td><td>318</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>207</td><td>213</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>169</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>96</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>579</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3086</td><td>$ 2923</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013 and 2012?
Answer: 4.4
Question: what about the total including 2011?
Answer: 6.6
Question: what is the average of these three years?
| 2.2 |
CONVFINQA5936 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the amount spent for r&d in 2016?
| 78.0 |
CONVFINQA5937 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the amount spent for r&d in 2016?
Answer: 78.0
Question: what was the amount spent in 2015?
| 119.0 |
CONVFINQA5938 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the amount spent for r&d in 2016?
Answer: 78.0
Question: what was the amount spent in 2015?
Answer: 119.0
Question: what was the net difference?
| -41.0 |
CONVFINQA5939 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the amount spent for r&d in 2016?
Answer: 78.0
Question: what was the amount spent in 2015?
Answer: 119.0
Question: what was the net difference?
Answer: -41.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.34454 |
CONVFINQA5940 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notional amounts and derivative receivables marked to market ( 201cmtm 201d ) notional amounts ( a ) derivative receivables mtm as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 , ( in billions )</td><td>as of december 31 , 2005</td><td>as of december 31 , 2004</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 38493</td><td>$ 37022</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>2136</td><td>1886</td><td>3</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity</td><td>458</td><td>434</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>2241</td><td>1071</td><td>4</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>265</td><td>101</td><td>7</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 43593</td><td>$ 40514</td><td>50</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>collateral held againstderivative receivables</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>exposure net of collateral</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>$ 44 ( b )</td><td>$ 57 ( c )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the notional amounts represent the gross sum of long and short third-party notional derivative contracts , excluding written options and foreign exchange spot contracts , which significantly exceed the possible credit losses that could arise from such transactions . for most derivative transactions , the notional principal amount does not change hands ; it is used simply as a reference to calculate payments . ( b ) the firm held $ 33 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2005 , consisting of $ 27 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 6 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 27 billion is reflected within the $ 50 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 33 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . ( c ) the firm held $ 41 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2004 , consisting of $ 32 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 9 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 32 billion is reflected within the $ 66 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 41 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co . 68 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2005 annual report 1 year 2 years 5 years 10 years mdp avgavgdredre exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2005 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the reported derivative receivables ( i.e. , the mtm or fair value of the derivative contracts after taking into account the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements ) at each of the dates indicated : the mtm of derivative receivables contracts represents the cost to replace the contracts at current market rates should the counterparty default . when jpmorgan chase has more than one transaction outstanding with a counter- party , and a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists with that counterparty , the netted mtm exposure , less collateral held , represents , in the firm 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net mtm value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . however , the total potential future credit risk embedded in the firm 2019s derivatives portfolio is not the simple sum of all peak client credit risks . this is because , at the portfolio level , credit risk is reduced by the fact that when offsetting transactions are done with separate counter- parties , only one of the two trades can generate a credit loss , even if both counterparties were to default simultaneously . the firm refers to this effect as market diversification , and the market-diversified peak ( 201cmdp 201d ) measure is a portfolio aggregation of counterparty peak measures , representing the maximum losses at the 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level that would occur if all coun- terparties defaulted under any one given market scenario and time frame . derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) exposure is a measure that expresses the riskiness of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the riskiness of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) is a measure of the expected mtm value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the credit valuation adjustment ( 201ccva 201d ) , as further described below . average exposure was $ 36 billion and $ 38 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables mtm net of other highly liquid collateral of $ 44 billion and $ 57 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the graph below shows exposure profiles to derivatives over the next 10 years as calculated by the mdp , dre and avg metrics . all three measures generally show declining exposure after the first year , if no new trades were added to the portfolio. .
Question: what was the change in value in interest rate from 2004 to 2005?
| 1471.0 |
CONVFINQA5941 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notional amounts and derivative receivables marked to market ( 201cmtm 201d ) notional amounts ( a ) derivative receivables mtm as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 , ( in billions )</td><td>as of december 31 , 2005</td><td>as of december 31 , 2004</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 38493</td><td>$ 37022</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>2136</td><td>1886</td><td>3</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity</td><td>458</td><td>434</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>2241</td><td>1071</td><td>4</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>265</td><td>101</td><td>7</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 43593</td><td>$ 40514</td><td>50</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>collateral held againstderivative receivables</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>exposure net of collateral</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>$ 44 ( b )</td><td>$ 57 ( c )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the notional amounts represent the gross sum of long and short third-party notional derivative contracts , excluding written options and foreign exchange spot contracts , which significantly exceed the possible credit losses that could arise from such transactions . for most derivative transactions , the notional principal amount does not change hands ; it is used simply as a reference to calculate payments . ( b ) the firm held $ 33 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2005 , consisting of $ 27 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 6 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 27 billion is reflected within the $ 50 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 33 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . ( c ) the firm held $ 41 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2004 , consisting of $ 32 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 9 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 32 billion is reflected within the $ 66 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 41 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co . 68 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2005 annual report 1 year 2 years 5 years 10 years mdp avgavgdredre exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2005 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the reported derivative receivables ( i.e. , the mtm or fair value of the derivative contracts after taking into account the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements ) at each of the dates indicated : the mtm of derivative receivables contracts represents the cost to replace the contracts at current market rates should the counterparty default . when jpmorgan chase has more than one transaction outstanding with a counter- party , and a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists with that counterparty , the netted mtm exposure , less collateral held , represents , in the firm 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net mtm value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . however , the total potential future credit risk embedded in the firm 2019s derivatives portfolio is not the simple sum of all peak client credit risks . this is because , at the portfolio level , credit risk is reduced by the fact that when offsetting transactions are done with separate counter- parties , only one of the two trades can generate a credit loss , even if both counterparties were to default simultaneously . the firm refers to this effect as market diversification , and the market-diversified peak ( 201cmdp 201d ) measure is a portfolio aggregation of counterparty peak measures , representing the maximum losses at the 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level that would occur if all coun- terparties defaulted under any one given market scenario and time frame . derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) exposure is a measure that expresses the riskiness of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the riskiness of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) is a measure of the expected mtm value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the credit valuation adjustment ( 201ccva 201d ) , as further described below . average exposure was $ 36 billion and $ 38 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables mtm net of other highly liquid collateral of $ 44 billion and $ 57 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the graph below shows exposure profiles to derivatives over the next 10 years as calculated by the mdp , dre and avg metrics . all three measures generally show declining exposure after the first year , if no new trades were added to the portfolio. .
Question: what was the change in value in interest rate from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: 1471.0
Question: what was the value in 2004?
| 37022.0 |
CONVFINQA5942 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notional amounts and derivative receivables marked to market ( 201cmtm 201d ) notional amounts ( a ) derivative receivables mtm as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 , ( in billions )</td><td>as of december 31 , 2005</td><td>as of december 31 , 2004</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 38493</td><td>$ 37022</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>2136</td><td>1886</td><td>3</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity</td><td>458</td><td>434</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>2241</td><td>1071</td><td>4</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>265</td><td>101</td><td>7</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 43593</td><td>$ 40514</td><td>50</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>collateral held againstderivative receivables</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>exposure net of collateral</td><td>na</td><td>na</td><td>$ 44 ( b )</td><td>$ 57 ( c )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the notional amounts represent the gross sum of long and short third-party notional derivative contracts , excluding written options and foreign exchange spot contracts , which significantly exceed the possible credit losses that could arise from such transactions . for most derivative transactions , the notional principal amount does not change hands ; it is used simply as a reference to calculate payments . ( b ) the firm held $ 33 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2005 , consisting of $ 27 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 6 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 27 billion is reflected within the $ 50 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 33 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . ( c ) the firm held $ 41 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2004 , consisting of $ 32 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 9 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 32 billion is reflected within the $ 66 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 41 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co . 68 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2005 annual report 1 year 2 years 5 years 10 years mdp avgavgdredre exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2005 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the reported derivative receivables ( i.e. , the mtm or fair value of the derivative contracts after taking into account the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements ) at each of the dates indicated : the mtm of derivative receivables contracts represents the cost to replace the contracts at current market rates should the counterparty default . when jpmorgan chase has more than one transaction outstanding with a counter- party , and a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists with that counterparty , the netted mtm exposure , less collateral held , represents , in the firm 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net mtm value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . however , the total potential future credit risk embedded in the firm 2019s derivatives portfolio is not the simple sum of all peak client credit risks . this is because , at the portfolio level , credit risk is reduced by the fact that when offsetting transactions are done with separate counter- parties , only one of the two trades can generate a credit loss , even if both counterparties were to default simultaneously . the firm refers to this effect as market diversification , and the market-diversified peak ( 201cmdp 201d ) measure is a portfolio aggregation of counterparty peak measures , representing the maximum losses at the 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level that would occur if all coun- terparties defaulted under any one given market scenario and time frame . derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) exposure is a measure that expresses the riskiness of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the riskiness of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) is a measure of the expected mtm value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the credit valuation adjustment ( 201ccva 201d ) , as further described below . average exposure was $ 36 billion and $ 38 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables mtm net of other highly liquid collateral of $ 44 billion and $ 57 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the graph below shows exposure profiles to derivatives over the next 10 years as calculated by the mdp , dre and avg metrics . all three measures generally show declining exposure after the first year , if no new trades were added to the portfolio. .
Question: what was the change in value in interest rate from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: 1471.0
Question: what was the value in 2004?
Answer: 37022.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.03973 |
CONVFINQA5943 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the increase in property operating expenses from our large market same store group is primarily the result of increases in real estate taxes of $ 3.2 million , personnel expenses of $ 1.9 million , water expenses of approximately $ 1.0 million , cable expenses of $ 0.5 million , and waste removal expenses of $ 0.2 million . the increase in property operating expenses from our secondary market same store group is primarily a result of increases in other operating expenses of $ 1.5 million , real estate taxes of $ 1.1 million , and personnel expenses of $ 1.2 million . the decrease in property operating expenses from our non-same store and other group is primarily the result of decreases in personnel expenses of $ 2.4 million and utility expenses of $ 1.7 million . depreciation and amortization the following table shows our depreciation and amortization expense by segment for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 ( dollars in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2015 year ended december 31 , 2014 increase percentage increase . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 2014</td><td>increase</td><td>percentage increase</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>large market same store</td><td>$ 168872</td><td>$ 174957</td><td>$ -6085 ( 6085 )</td><td>( 3.5 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>secondary market same store</td><td>85008</td><td>86058</td><td>-1050 ( 1050 )</td><td>( 1.2 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>same store portfolio</td><td>253880</td><td>261015</td><td>-7135 ( 7135 )</td><td>( 2.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-same store and other</td><td>40640</td><td>40797</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 294520</td><td>$ 301812</td><td>$ -7292 ( 7292 )</td><td>( 2.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> the decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily due to a decrease of $ 19.4 million related to the amortization of the fair value of in-place leases and resident relationships acquired as a result of the merger from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . this decrease was partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense of $ 11.7 million driven by an increase in gross real estate assets from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . property management expenses property management expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 were approximately $ 31.0 million , a decrease of $ 1.1 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the majority of the decrease was related to a decrease in state franchise taxes of $ 2.1 million , partially offset by an increase in insurance expense of $ 0.6 million , an increase in payroll expense of $ 0.3 million , and an increase in incentive expense $ 0.3 million . general and administrative expenses general and administrative expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 were approximately $ 25.7 million , an increase of $ 4.8 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the majority of the increase was related to increases in legal fees of $ 2.7 million and stock option expenses of $ 1.6 million . merger and integration related expenses there were no merger or integration related expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , as these expenses related primarily to severance , legal , professional , temporary systems , staffing , and facilities costs incurred for the acquisition and integration of colonial . for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , merger and integration related expenses were approximately $ 3.2 million and $ 8.4 million , respectively . interest expense interest expense for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was approximately $ 122.3 million , a decrease of $ 1.6 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in amortization of deferred financing cost from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 of approximately $ 0.9 million . also , the overall debt balance decreased from $ 3.5 billion to $ 3.4 billion , a decrease of $ 85.1 million . the average effective interest rate remained at 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and the average years to rate maturity increased from 4.4 years to 4.8 years . job title mid-america apartment 10-k revision 1 serial <12345678> date sunday , march 20 , 2016 job number 304352-1 type page no . 50 operator abigaels .
Question: in 2015, how much did the depreciation and amortization in the large market same store represent in relation to the one for the secondary market same store?
| 1.98654 |
CONVFINQA5944 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the increase in property operating expenses from our large market same store group is primarily the result of increases in real estate taxes of $ 3.2 million , personnel expenses of $ 1.9 million , water expenses of approximately $ 1.0 million , cable expenses of $ 0.5 million , and waste removal expenses of $ 0.2 million . the increase in property operating expenses from our secondary market same store group is primarily a result of increases in other operating expenses of $ 1.5 million , real estate taxes of $ 1.1 million , and personnel expenses of $ 1.2 million . the decrease in property operating expenses from our non-same store and other group is primarily the result of decreases in personnel expenses of $ 2.4 million and utility expenses of $ 1.7 million . depreciation and amortization the following table shows our depreciation and amortization expense by segment for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 ( dollars in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2015 year ended december 31 , 2014 increase percentage increase . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 2014</td><td>increase</td><td>percentage increase</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>large market same store</td><td>$ 168872</td><td>$ 174957</td><td>$ -6085 ( 6085 )</td><td>( 3.5 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>secondary market same store</td><td>85008</td><td>86058</td><td>-1050 ( 1050 )</td><td>( 1.2 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>same store portfolio</td><td>253880</td><td>261015</td><td>-7135 ( 7135 )</td><td>( 2.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-same store and other</td><td>40640</td><td>40797</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 294520</td><td>$ 301812</td><td>$ -7292 ( 7292 )</td><td>( 2.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> the decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily due to a decrease of $ 19.4 million related to the amortization of the fair value of in-place leases and resident relationships acquired as a result of the merger from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . this decrease was partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense of $ 11.7 million driven by an increase in gross real estate assets from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . property management expenses property management expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 were approximately $ 31.0 million , a decrease of $ 1.1 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the majority of the decrease was related to a decrease in state franchise taxes of $ 2.1 million , partially offset by an increase in insurance expense of $ 0.6 million , an increase in payroll expense of $ 0.3 million , and an increase in incentive expense $ 0.3 million . general and administrative expenses general and administrative expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 were approximately $ 25.7 million , an increase of $ 4.8 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the majority of the increase was related to increases in legal fees of $ 2.7 million and stock option expenses of $ 1.6 million . merger and integration related expenses there were no merger or integration related expenses for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , as these expenses related primarily to severance , legal , professional , temporary systems , staffing , and facilities costs incurred for the acquisition and integration of colonial . for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , merger and integration related expenses were approximately $ 3.2 million and $ 8.4 million , respectively . interest expense interest expense for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was approximately $ 122.3 million , a decrease of $ 1.6 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in amortization of deferred financing cost from the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2015 of approximately $ 0.9 million . also , the overall debt balance decreased from $ 3.5 billion to $ 3.4 billion , a decrease of $ 85.1 million . the average effective interest rate remained at 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and the average years to rate maturity increased from 4.4 years to 4.8 years . job title mid-america apartment 10-k revision 1 serial <12345678> date sunday , march 20 , 2016 job number 304352-1 type page no . 50 operator abigaels .
Question: in 2015, how much did the depreciation and amortization in the large market same store represent in relation to the one for the secondary market same store?
Answer: 1.98654
Question: and between that year and the one before, what was the variation in the percentual decrease of those large market same-store and secondary market same-store?
| 2.3 |
CONVFINQA5945 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net change in citigroup from 2007 to 2008?
| -51.65 |
CONVFINQA5946 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net change in citigroup from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: -51.65
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.73408 |
CONVFINQA5947 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>preliminary purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 8763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>2332</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>26711</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>21079</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-1349 ( 1349 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 57536</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>5998</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: what was the total purchase price of the communication sites, in dollars?
| 64200000.0 |
CONVFINQA5948 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>preliminary purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 8763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>2332</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>26711</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>21079</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-1349 ( 1349 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 57536</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>5998</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: what was the total purchase price of the communication sites, in dollars?
Answer: 64200000.0
Question: what was, then, the average price for each of the communication sites purchased?
| 341489.3617 |
CONVFINQA5949 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning allowance balance</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>charged to costs and expenses</td><td>12</td><td>17</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending allowance balance</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td></tr></table> vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts in 2006?
| 52.0 |
CONVFINQA5950 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning allowance balance</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>charged to costs and expenses</td><td>12</td><td>17</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending allowance balance</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td></tr></table> vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts in 2006?
Answer: 52.0
Question: what was the balance in 2005?
| 46.0 |
CONVFINQA5951 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning allowance balance</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>charged to costs and expenses</td><td>12</td><td>17</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending allowance balance</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td></tr></table> vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts in 2006?
Answer: 52.0
Question: what was the balance in 2005?
Answer: 46.0
Question: what is the net difference?
| 6.0 |
CONVFINQA5952 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning allowance balance</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>charged to costs and expenses</td><td>12</td><td>17</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending allowance balance</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td></tr></table> vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts in 2006?
Answer: 52.0
Question: what was the balance in 2005?
Answer: 46.0
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 6.0
Question: what was the 2005 balance?
| 46.0 |
CONVFINQA5953 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning allowance balance</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>charged to costs and expenses</td><td>12</td><td>17</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending allowance balance</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td></tr></table> vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts in 2006?
Answer: 52.0
Question: what was the balance in 2005?
Answer: 46.0
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 6.0
Question: what was the 2005 balance?
Answer: 46.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.13043 |
CONVFINQA5954 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 7 . dispositions outside-operated norwegian properties 2013 on october 31 , 2008 , we closed the sale of our norwegian outside-operated properties and undeveloped offshore acreage in the heimdal area of the norwegian north sea for net proceeds of $ 301 million , with a pretax gain of $ 254 million as of december 31 , 2008 . pilot travel centers 2013 on october 8 , 2008 , we completed the sale of our 50 percent ownership interest in ptc . sale proceeds were $ 625 million , with a pretax gain on the sale of $ 126 million . immediately preceding the sale , we received a $ 75 million partial redemption of our ownership interest from ptc that was accounted for as a return of investment . operated irish properties 2013 on december 17 , 2008 , we agreed to sell our operated properties located in ireland for proceeds of $ 180 million , before post-closing adjustments and cash on hand at closing . closing is subject to completion of the necessary administrative processes . as of december 31 , 2008 , operating assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale , as disclosed by major class in the following table : ( in millions ) 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 164</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>103</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total assets</td><td>267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total liabilities</td><td>261</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net assets held for sale</td><td>$ 6</td></tr></table> 8 . discontinued operations on june 2 , 2006 , we sold our russian oil exploration and production businesses in the khanty-mansiysk region of western siberia . under the terms of the agreement , we received $ 787 million for these businesses , plus preliminary working capital and other closing adjustments of $ 56 million , for a total transaction value of $ 843 million . proceeds net of transaction costs and cash held by the russian businesses at the transaction date totaled $ 832 million . a gain on the sale of $ 243 million ( $ 342 million before income taxes ) was reported in discontinued operations for 2006 . income taxes on this gain were reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward . exploration and production segment goodwill of $ 21 million was allocated to the russian assets and reduced the reported gain . adjustments to the sales price were completed in 2007 and an additional gain on the sale of $ 8 million ( $ 13 million before income taxes ) was recognized . the activities of the russian businesses have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2006 . revenues applicable to discontinued operations were $ 173 million and pretax income from discontinued operations was $ 45 million for 2006. .
Question: what was the total in current assets and noncurrent assets in 2008, in millions?
| 267.0 |
CONVFINQA5955 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 7 . dispositions outside-operated norwegian properties 2013 on october 31 , 2008 , we closed the sale of our norwegian outside-operated properties and undeveloped offshore acreage in the heimdal area of the norwegian north sea for net proceeds of $ 301 million , with a pretax gain of $ 254 million as of december 31 , 2008 . pilot travel centers 2013 on october 8 , 2008 , we completed the sale of our 50 percent ownership interest in ptc . sale proceeds were $ 625 million , with a pretax gain on the sale of $ 126 million . immediately preceding the sale , we received a $ 75 million partial redemption of our ownership interest from ptc that was accounted for as a return of investment . operated irish properties 2013 on december 17 , 2008 , we agreed to sell our operated properties located in ireland for proceeds of $ 180 million , before post-closing adjustments and cash on hand at closing . closing is subject to completion of the necessary administrative processes . as of december 31 , 2008 , operating assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale , as disclosed by major class in the following table : ( in millions ) 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 164</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>103</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total assets</td><td>267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total liabilities</td><td>261</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net assets held for sale</td><td>$ 6</td></tr></table> 8 . discontinued operations on june 2 , 2006 , we sold our russian oil exploration and production businesses in the khanty-mansiysk region of western siberia . under the terms of the agreement , we received $ 787 million for these businesses , plus preliminary working capital and other closing adjustments of $ 56 million , for a total transaction value of $ 843 million . proceeds net of transaction costs and cash held by the russian businesses at the transaction date totaled $ 832 million . a gain on the sale of $ 243 million ( $ 342 million before income taxes ) was reported in discontinued operations for 2006 . income taxes on this gain were reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward . exploration and production segment goodwill of $ 21 million was allocated to the russian assets and reduced the reported gain . adjustments to the sales price were completed in 2007 and an additional gain on the sale of $ 8 million ( $ 13 million before income taxes ) was recognized . the activities of the russian businesses have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2006 . revenues applicable to discontinued operations were $ 173 million and pretax income from discontinued operations was $ 45 million for 2006. .
Question: what was the total in current assets and noncurrent assets in 2008, in millions?
Answer: 267.0
Question: and what is the average between them, also in millions?
| 133.5 |
CONVFINQA5956 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in the net cash provided by operating activities?
| -2079.0 |
CONVFINQA5957 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in the net cash provided by operating activities?
Answer: -2079.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that net cash in 2011?
| -0.09917 |
CONVFINQA5958 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in the net cash provided by operating activities?
Answer: -2079.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that net cash in 2011?
Answer: -0.09917
Question: and over the subsequent year of this period, what was the change in that net cash?
| 19.0 |
CONVFINQA5959 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in the net cash provided by operating activities?
Answer: -2079.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that net cash in 2011?
Answer: -0.09917
Question: and over the subsequent year of this period, what was the change in that net cash?
Answer: 19.0
Question: and what percentage did this change represent in relation to the 2012 net cash?
| 0.00101 |
CONVFINQA5960 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: what was change in the value of the aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?
| 68.3 |
CONVFINQA5961 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: what was change in the value of the aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 68.3
Question: what was the value in 2005?
| 168.7 |
CONVFINQA5962 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: what was change in the value of the aggregate rent expense from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 68.3
Question: what was the value in 2005?
Answer: 168.7
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.40486 |
CONVFINQA5963 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2011?
| 70.3 |
CONVFINQA5964 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2011?
Answer: 70.3
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2010?
| 68.1 |
CONVFINQA5965 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2011?
Answer: 70.3
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2010?
Answer: 68.1
Question: what was the net change?
| 2.2 |
CONVFINQA5966 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2011?
Answer: 70.3
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2010?
Answer: 68.1
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: 2.2
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2010?
| 68.1 |
CONVFINQA5967 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2011?
Answer: 70.3
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2010?
Answer: 68.1
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: 2.2
Question: what was the balance of non-controlling interests at the end of 2010?
Answer: 68.1
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.03231 |
CONVFINQA5968 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .
Question: what was the interest expense net in 2017?
| 34.5 |
CONVFINQA5969 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .
Question: what was the interest expense net in 2017?
Answer: 34.5
Question: and what was it in 2016?
| 26.4 |
CONVFINQA5970 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .
Question: what was the interest expense net in 2017?
Answer: 34.5
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 26.4
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 8.1 |
CONVFINQA5971 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .
Question: what was the interest expense net in 2017?
Answer: 34.5
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 26.4
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 8.1
Question: what was the interest expense net in 2016?
| 26.4 |
CONVFINQA5972 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .
Question: what was the interest expense net in 2017?
Answer: 34.5
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 26.4
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 8.1
Question: what was the interest expense net in 2016?
Answer: 26.4
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2016 value, in percentage?
| 0.30682 |
CONVFINQA5973 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10800</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2013?
| 905.0 |
CONVFINQA5974 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10800</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2013?
Answer: 905.0
Question: what was it in 2012?
| 737.0 |
CONVFINQA5975 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10800</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2013?
Answer: 905.0
Question: what was it in 2012?
Answer: 737.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 1642.0 |
CONVFINQA5976 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10800</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2013?
Answer: 905.0
Question: what was it in 2012?
Answer: 737.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 1642.0
Question: what is the sum including operating profit from 2011?
| 2287.0 |
CONVFINQA5977 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10800</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2013?
Answer: 905.0
Question: what was it in 2012?
Answer: 737.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 1642.0
Question: what is the sum including operating profit from 2011?
Answer: 2287.0
Question: what is the total sum divided by 3?
| 762.33333 |
CONVFINQA5978 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2015 , we repurchased 36921641 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 99.16 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2015 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>3247731</td><td>$ 92.98</td><td>3221153</td><td>56078192</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>2325865</td><td>86.61</td><td>2322992</td><td>53755200</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>1105389</td><td>77.63</td><td>1102754</td><td>52652446</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6678985</td><td>$ 88.22</td><td>6646899</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 32086 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what percentage of the total number of shares purchased in november for the 4th quarter ended 12/31/15?
| 0.34824 |
CONVFINQA5979 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2015 , we repurchased 36921641 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 99.16 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2015 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>3247731</td><td>$ 92.98</td><td>3221153</td><td>56078192</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>2325865</td><td>86.61</td><td>2322992</td><td>53755200</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>1105389</td><td>77.63</td><td>1102754</td><td>52652446</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6678985</td><td>$ 88.22</td><td>6646899</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 32086 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what percentage of the total number of shares purchased in november for the 4th quarter ended 12/31/15?
Answer: 0.34824
Question: for the same quarter, what was the percentage of the total number of shares purchased that was attributable to the employees to pay stock option exercise prices, and satisfy excess tax withholding obligations?
| 0.0048 |
CONVFINQA5980 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 118 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used as an input for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative contracts , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative contracts . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the peak , dre and avg metrics . the three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2018 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the ratings profile of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of all collateral , at the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as assigned by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral</td><td>rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral</td><td>exposure net of all collateral</td><td>% ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3</td><td>$ 11831</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>$ 11529</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>a+/a1 to a-/a3</td><td>7428</td><td>19</td><td>6919</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3</td><td>12536</td><td>32</td><td>13925</td><td>34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>bb+/ba1 to b-/b3</td><td>6373</td><td>16</td><td>7397</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ccc+/caa1 and below</td><td>723</td><td>2</td><td>645</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 40415</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> as previously noted , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . the percentage of the firm 2019s over-the-counter derivative transactions subject to collateral agreements 2014 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily 2014 was approximately 90% ( 90 % ) at both december 31 , 2018 , and december 31 , 2017. .
Question: in 2018, what percentage of the total derivative receivable ratings were ones equivalent to junk bonds?
| 18.0 |
CONVFINQA5981 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 118 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used as an input for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative contracts , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative contracts . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the peak , dre and avg metrics . the three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2018 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the ratings profile of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of all collateral , at the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as assigned by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral</td><td>rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral</td><td>exposure net of all collateral</td><td>% ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3</td><td>$ 11831</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>$ 11529</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>a+/a1 to a-/a3</td><td>7428</td><td>19</td><td>6919</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3</td><td>12536</td><td>32</td><td>13925</td><td>34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>bb+/ba1 to b-/b3</td><td>6373</td><td>16</td><td>7397</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ccc+/caa1 and below</td><td>723</td><td>2</td><td>645</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 40415</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> as previously noted , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . the percentage of the firm 2019s over-the-counter derivative transactions subject to collateral agreements 2014 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily 2014 was approximately 90% ( 90 % ) at both december 31 , 2018 , and december 31 , 2017. .
Question: in 2018, what percentage of the total derivative receivable ratings were ones equivalent to junk bonds?
Answer: 18.0
Question: and what was, in millions, the total amount of money represented by class b derivatives?
| 21322.0 |
CONVFINQA5982 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
to the two-class method . the provisions of this guidance were required for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the company has adopted this guidance for current period computations of earnings per share , and has updated prior period computations of earnings per share . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the company 2019s computation of earnings per share . refer to note 11 for further discussion . in june 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance addressing the determination of whether provisions that introduce adjustment features ( including contingent adjustment features ) would prevent treating a derivative contract or an embedded derivative on a company 2019s own stock as indexed solely to the company 2019s stock . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in march 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity 2019s financial position , financial performance , and cash flows . this guidance was effective for the fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued replacement guidance that requires the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at fair value . this replacement guidance also requires transaction costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred . it was effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the start of the fiscal year beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued accounting guidance that establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in september 2006 , the fasb issued accounting guidance which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 , however the fasb delayed the effective date to fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities , except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequent basis . the adoption of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2009</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 155596</td><td>$ 187072</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>785</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>work-in-process</td><td>71</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal inventories</td><td>156452</td><td>187809</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories reserve</td><td>-7964 ( 7964 )</td><td>-5577 ( 5577 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 148488</td><td>$ 182232</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of inventories reserve as of december 31, 2009?
| 7964.0 |
CONVFINQA5983 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
to the two-class method . the provisions of this guidance were required for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the company has adopted this guidance for current period computations of earnings per share , and has updated prior period computations of earnings per share . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the company 2019s computation of earnings per share . refer to note 11 for further discussion . in june 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance addressing the determination of whether provisions that introduce adjustment features ( including contingent adjustment features ) would prevent treating a derivative contract or an embedded derivative on a company 2019s own stock as indexed solely to the company 2019s stock . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in march 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity 2019s financial position , financial performance , and cash flows . this guidance was effective for the fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued replacement guidance that requires the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at fair value . this replacement guidance also requires transaction costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred . it was effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the start of the fiscal year beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued accounting guidance that establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in september 2006 , the fasb issued accounting guidance which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 , however the fasb delayed the effective date to fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities , except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequent basis . the adoption of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2009</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 155596</td><td>$ 187072</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>785</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>work-in-process</td><td>71</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal inventories</td><td>156452</td><td>187809</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories reserve</td><td>-7964 ( 7964 )</td><td>-5577 ( 5577 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 148488</td><td>$ 182232</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of inventories reserve as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 7964.0
Question: what about as of december 31, 2008?
| 5577.0 |
CONVFINQA5984 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
to the two-class method . the provisions of this guidance were required for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the company has adopted this guidance for current period computations of earnings per share , and has updated prior period computations of earnings per share . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the company 2019s computation of earnings per share . refer to note 11 for further discussion . in june 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance addressing the determination of whether provisions that introduce adjustment features ( including contingent adjustment features ) would prevent treating a derivative contract or an embedded derivative on a company 2019s own stock as indexed solely to the company 2019s stock . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in march 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity 2019s financial position , financial performance , and cash flows . this guidance was effective for the fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued replacement guidance that requires the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at fair value . this replacement guidance also requires transaction costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred . it was effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the start of the fiscal year beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued accounting guidance that establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in september 2006 , the fasb issued accounting guidance which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 , however the fasb delayed the effective date to fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities , except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequent basis . the adoption of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2009</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 155596</td><td>$ 187072</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>785</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>work-in-process</td><td>71</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal inventories</td><td>156452</td><td>187809</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories reserve</td><td>-7964 ( 7964 )</td><td>-5577 ( 5577 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 148488</td><td>$ 182232</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of inventories reserve as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 7964.0
Question: what about as of december 31, 2008?
Answer: 5577.0
Question: what is the net change between 2008 and 2009?
| 2387.0 |
CONVFINQA5985 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
to the two-class method . the provisions of this guidance were required for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the company has adopted this guidance for current period computations of earnings per share , and has updated prior period computations of earnings per share . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the company 2019s computation of earnings per share . refer to note 11 for further discussion . in june 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance addressing the determination of whether provisions that introduce adjustment features ( including contingent adjustment features ) would prevent treating a derivative contract or an embedded derivative on a company 2019s own stock as indexed solely to the company 2019s stock . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in march 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity 2019s financial position , financial performance , and cash flows . this guidance was effective for the fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued replacement guidance that requires the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at fair value . this replacement guidance also requires transaction costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred . it was effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the start of the fiscal year beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued accounting guidance that establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in september 2006 , the fasb issued accounting guidance which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 , however the fasb delayed the effective date to fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities , except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequent basis . the adoption of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2009</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 155596</td><td>$ 187072</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>785</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>work-in-process</td><td>71</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal inventories</td><td>156452</td><td>187809</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories reserve</td><td>-7964 ( 7964 )</td><td>-5577 ( 5577 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 148488</td><td>$ 182232</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of inventories reserve as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 7964.0
Question: what about as of december 31, 2008?
Answer: 5577.0
Question: what is the net change between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 2387.0
Question: what is the balance of inventories reserve as of december 31, 2008?
| 5577.0 |
CONVFINQA5986 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
to the two-class method . the provisions of this guidance were required for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the company has adopted this guidance for current period computations of earnings per share , and has updated prior period computations of earnings per share . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the company 2019s computation of earnings per share . refer to note 11 for further discussion . in june 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance addressing the determination of whether provisions that introduce adjustment features ( including contingent adjustment features ) would prevent treating a derivative contract or an embedded derivative on a company 2019s own stock as indexed solely to the company 2019s stock . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in march 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity 2019s financial position , financial performance , and cash flows . this guidance was effective for the fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued replacement guidance that requires the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at fair value . this replacement guidance also requires transaction costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred . it was effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the start of the fiscal year beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued accounting guidance that establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in september 2006 , the fasb issued accounting guidance which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 , however the fasb delayed the effective date to fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities , except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequent basis . the adoption of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2009</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 155596</td><td>$ 187072</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>785</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>work-in-process</td><td>71</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal inventories</td><td>156452</td><td>187809</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories reserve</td><td>-7964 ( 7964 )</td><td>-5577 ( 5577 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 148488</td><td>$ 182232</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of inventories reserve as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 7964.0
Question: what about as of december 31, 2008?
Answer: 5577.0
Question: what is the net change between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 2387.0
Question: what is the balance of inventories reserve as of december 31, 2008?
Answer: 5577.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.42801 |
CONVFINQA5987 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2005?
| 2595.0 |
CONVFINQA5988 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2005?
Answer: 2595.0
Question: what was the value in 2004?
| 2257.0 |
CONVFINQA5989 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2005?
Answer: 2595.0
Question: what was the value in 2004?
Answer: 2257.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 338.0 |
CONVFINQA5990 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2005?
Answer: 2595.0
Question: what was the value in 2004?
Answer: 2257.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 338.0
Question: what was the 2004 value?
| 2257.0 |
CONVFINQA5991 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2005?
Answer: 2595.0
Question: what was the value in 2004?
Answer: 2257.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 338.0
Question: what was the 2004 value?
Answer: 2257.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2004 value?
| 0.14976 |
CONVFINQA5992 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2007</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 43.30</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 449.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2007</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 44.16</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 322.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2007</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 44.20</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 43.27</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in october 2007?
| 3493426.0 |
CONVFINQA5993 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2007</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 43.30</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 449.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2007</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 44.16</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 322.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2007</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 44.20</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 43.27</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in october 2007?
Answer: 3493426.0
Question: and what was the average price paid for each of those shares?
| 43.3 |
CONVFINQA5994 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2007</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 43.30</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 449.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2007</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 44.16</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 322.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2007</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 44.20</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 43.27</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in october 2007?
Answer: 3493426.0
Question: and what was the average price paid for each of those shares?
Answer: 43.3
Question: what was, then, the total amount spent in the repurchase of those shares?
| 151265345.8 |
CONVFINQA5995 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2007</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 43.30</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 449.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2007</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 44.16</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 322.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2007</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 44.20</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 43.27</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in october 2007?
Answer: 3493426.0
Question: and what was the average price paid for each of those shares?
Answer: 43.3
Question: what was, then, the total amount spent in the repurchase of those shares?
Answer: 151265345.8
Question: and how much is that in millions?
| 151.26535 |
CONVFINQA5996 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in the last quarter of 2018?
| 12508023.0 |
CONVFINQA5997 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in the last quarter of 2018?
Answer: 12508023.0
Question: and what was the total amount of shares repurchased in that year?
| 57669746.0 |
CONVFINQA5998 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in the last quarter of 2018?
Answer: 12508023.0
Question: and what was the total amount of shares repurchased in that year?
Answer: 57669746.0
Question: what percentage, then, does the fourth quarter represent in relation to this total?
| 0.21689 |
CONVFINQA5999 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in the last quarter of 2018?
Answer: 12508023.0
Question: and what was the total amount of shares repurchased in that year?
Answer: 57669746.0
Question: what percentage, then, does the fourth quarter represent in relation to this total?
Answer: 0.21689
Question: and what was the full value spent on the repurchase of this total, in millions?
| 8287.1425 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.