id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA6100 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loans sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s dus program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loan sales</td><td>-</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 54</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions . as discussed in note 3 in this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and gnma , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of whole-loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality . key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loan 2019s compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the investor , including underwriting standards , delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party , sufficient collateral valuation , and the validity of the lien securing the loan . as a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations , investors may request pnc to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans . these investor indemnification or repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make- whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when , after review of the claim , we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investor 2019s claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred , such breach has not been cured , and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan . depending on the sale agreement and upon proper notice from the investor , we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days , although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time . with the exception of the sales the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 199 .
Question: what was the number of reserves available as of 12/31/11?
Answer: 47.0
Question: and in 2010?
Answer: 54.0
Question: so what was the combined value during these two years?
| 101.0 |
CONVFINQA6101 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loans sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s dus program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loan sales</td><td>-</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 54</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions . as discussed in note 3 in this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and gnma , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of whole-loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality . key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loan 2019s compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the investor , including underwriting standards , delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party , sufficient collateral valuation , and the validity of the lien securing the loan . as a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations , investors may request pnc to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans . these investor indemnification or repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make- whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when , after review of the claim , we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investor 2019s claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred , such breach has not been cured , and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan . depending on the sale agreement and upon proper notice from the investor , we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days , although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time . with the exception of the sales the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 199 .
Question: what was the number of reserves available as of 12/31/11?
Answer: 47.0
Question: and in 2010?
Answer: 54.0
Question: so what was the combined value during these two years?
Answer: 101.0
Question: and considering if there were no loan sales in 2010?
| 125.0 |
CONVFINQA6102 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what is the net sales in 2015?
| 45366.0 |
CONVFINQA6103 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what is the net sales in 2015?
Answer: 45366.0
Question: what about in 2014?
| 47369.0 |
CONVFINQA6104 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what is the net sales in 2015?
Answer: 45366.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 47369.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -2003.0 |
CONVFINQA6105 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what is the net sales in 2015?
Answer: 45366.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 47369.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -2003.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.04229 |
CONVFINQA6106 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what is the net sales in 2015?
Answer: 45366.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 47369.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -2003.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: -0.04229
Question: what is the net earnings margin in 2015?
| 0.0779 |
CONVFINQA6107 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
no . 159 requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings at each reporting date . sfas no . 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 159 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , fair value measurements , which defines fair value , provides a framework for measuring fair value , and expands the disclosures required for fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements ; it does not require any new fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 157 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in june 2006 , the fasb issued fasb interpretation no . ( 2018 2018fin 2019 2019 ) 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes-an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by creating a framework for how companies should recognize , measure , present , and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions that they have taken or expect to take in a tax return . fin 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2006 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of fin 48 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics for each of the last three fiscal years ( dollars in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td><td>$ 8261</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td><td>$ 895</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 12657</td><td>$ 8066</td><td>$ 6813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 2535</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 15.4 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 5.3 billion over the same balance at the end of september 30 , 2006 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 5.5 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 365 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 377 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 735 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 251 million . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is primarily invested in highly rated , liquid investments . as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , $ 6.5 billion and $ 4.1 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the inventory value as of 9/29/07?
| 346.0 |
CONVFINQA6108 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
no . 159 requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings at each reporting date . sfas no . 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 159 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , fair value measurements , which defines fair value , provides a framework for measuring fair value , and expands the disclosures required for fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements ; it does not require any new fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 157 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in june 2006 , the fasb issued fasb interpretation no . ( 2018 2018fin 2019 2019 ) 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes-an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by creating a framework for how companies should recognize , measure , present , and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions that they have taken or expect to take in a tax return . fin 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2006 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of fin 48 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics for each of the last three fiscal years ( dollars in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td><td>$ 8261</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td><td>$ 895</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 12657</td><td>$ 8066</td><td>$ 6813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 2535</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 15.4 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 5.3 billion over the same balance at the end of september 30 , 2006 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 5.5 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 365 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 377 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 735 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 251 million . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is primarily invested in highly rated , liquid investments . as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , $ 6.5 billion and $ 4.1 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the inventory value as of 9/29/07?
Answer: 346.0
Question: and for 9/30/06?
| 270.0 |
CONVFINQA6109 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
no . 159 requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings at each reporting date . sfas no . 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 159 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , fair value measurements , which defines fair value , provides a framework for measuring fair value , and expands the disclosures required for fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements ; it does not require any new fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 157 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in june 2006 , the fasb issued fasb interpretation no . ( 2018 2018fin 2019 2019 ) 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes-an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by creating a framework for how companies should recognize , measure , present , and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions that they have taken or expect to take in a tax return . fin 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2006 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of fin 48 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics for each of the last three fiscal years ( dollars in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td><td>$ 8261</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td><td>$ 895</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 12657</td><td>$ 8066</td><td>$ 6813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 2535</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 15.4 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 5.3 billion over the same balance at the end of september 30 , 2006 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 5.5 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 365 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 377 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 735 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 251 million . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is primarily invested in highly rated , liquid investments . as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , $ 6.5 billion and $ 4.1 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the inventory value as of 9/29/07?
Answer: 346.0
Question: and for 9/30/06?
Answer: 270.0
Question: so what was the difference in value during these years?
| 76.0 |
CONVFINQA6110 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
no . 159 requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings at each reporting date . sfas no . 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 159 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , fair value measurements , which defines fair value , provides a framework for measuring fair value , and expands the disclosures required for fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements ; it does not require any new fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 157 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in june 2006 , the fasb issued fasb interpretation no . ( 2018 2018fin 2019 2019 ) 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes-an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by creating a framework for how companies should recognize , measure , present , and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions that they have taken or expect to take in a tax return . fin 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2006 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of fin 48 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics for each of the last three fiscal years ( dollars in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td><td>$ 8261</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td><td>$ 895</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 12657</td><td>$ 8066</td><td>$ 6813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 2535</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 15.4 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 5.3 billion over the same balance at the end of september 30 , 2006 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 5.5 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 365 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 377 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 735 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 251 million . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is primarily invested in highly rated , liquid investments . as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , $ 6.5 billion and $ 4.1 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the inventory value as of 9/29/07?
Answer: 346.0
Question: and for 9/30/06?
Answer: 270.0
Question: so what was the difference in value during these years?
Answer: 76.0
Question: and the value for 2006 again?
| 270.0 |
CONVFINQA6111 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
no . 159 requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings at each reporting date . sfas no . 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 159 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , fair value measurements , which defines fair value , provides a framework for measuring fair value , and expands the disclosures required for fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements ; it does not require any new fair value measurements . sfas no . 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 157 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . in june 2006 , the fasb issued fasb interpretation no . ( 2018 2018fin 2019 2019 ) 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes-an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by creating a framework for how companies should recognize , measure , present , and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions that they have taken or expect to take in a tax return . fin 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2006 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of fin 48 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics for each of the last three fiscal years ( dollars in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td><td>$ 8261</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td><td>$ 895</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 12657</td><td>$ 8066</td><td>$ 6813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 2535</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 15.4 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 5.3 billion over the same balance at the end of september 30 , 2006 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 5.5 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 365 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 377 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 735 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 251 million . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is primarily invested in highly rated , liquid investments . as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , $ 6.5 billion and $ 4.1 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the inventory value as of 9/29/07?
Answer: 346.0
Question: and for 9/30/06?
Answer: 270.0
Question: so what was the difference in value during these years?
Answer: 76.0
Question: and the value for 2006 again?
Answer: 270.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 0.28148 |
CONVFINQA6112 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the decline in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
| 386.0 |
CONVFINQA6113 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the decline in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 386.0
Question: and what was that decline as a portion of that fair value in 2010?
| 0.37367 |
CONVFINQA6114 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the decline in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 386.0
Question: and what was that decline as a portion of that fair value in 2010?
Answer: 0.37367
Question: what is that in percentage?
| 37.36689 |
CONVFINQA6115 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the decline in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 386.0
Question: and what was that decline as a portion of that fair value in 2010?
Answer: 0.37367
Question: what is that in percentage?
Answer: 37.36689
Question: and what was the total fair value for those two years combined?
| 1680.0 |
CONVFINQA6116 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the decline in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 386.0
Question: and what was that decline as a portion of that fair value in 2010?
Answer: 0.37367
Question: what is that in percentage?
Answer: 37.36689
Question: and what was the total fair value for those two years combined?
Answer: 1680.0
Question: and what was the average between them, in millions?
| 840.0 |
CONVFINQA6117 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the total performance united parcel service inc . in the five year period ended in 2016?
| 89.72 |
CONVFINQA6118 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the total performance united parcel service inc . in the five year period ended in 2016?
Answer: 89.72
Question: in that same period, what was that change for the standard & poor 2019s 500 index?
| 98.09 |
CONVFINQA6119 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the total performance united parcel service inc . in the five year period ended in 2016?
Answer: 89.72
Question: in that same period, what was that change for the standard & poor 2019s 500 index?
Answer: 98.09
Question: what was the united parcel service inc . change as a portion of that performance in 2011?
| 0.8972 |
CONVFINQA6120 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the total performance united parcel service inc . in the five year period ended in 2016?
Answer: 89.72
Question: in that same period, what was that change for the standard & poor 2019s 500 index?
Answer: 98.09
Question: what was the united parcel service inc . change as a portion of that performance in 2011?
Answer: 0.8972
Question: and what was the standard & poor 2019s 500 index change as a portion of the performance of that stock in 2011?
| 0.9809 |
CONVFINQA6121 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the total performance united parcel service inc . in the five year period ended in 2016?
Answer: 89.72
Question: in that same period, what was that change for the standard & poor 2019s 500 index?
Answer: 98.09
Question: what was the united parcel service inc . change as a portion of that performance in 2011?
Answer: 0.8972
Question: and what was the standard & poor 2019s 500 index change as a portion of the performance of that stock in 2011?
Answer: 0.9809
Question: what is, then, the difference between the united parcel service inc . portion and this standard & poor 2019s 500 index one?
| -0.0837 |
CONVFINQA6122 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the total performance united parcel service inc . in the five year period ended in 2016?
Answer: 89.72
Question: in that same period, what was that change for the standard & poor 2019s 500 index?
Answer: 98.09
Question: what was the united parcel service inc . change as a portion of that performance in 2011?
Answer: 0.8972
Question: and what was the standard & poor 2019s 500 index change as a portion of the performance of that stock in 2011?
Answer: 0.9809
Question: what is, then, the difference between the united parcel service inc . portion and this standard & poor 2019s 500 index one?
Answer: -0.0837
Question: and what was the united parcel service inc . portion in percentage?
| 0.8972 |
CONVFINQA6123 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of disca as of 12/31/13?
| 638.56 |
CONVFINQA6124 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of disca as of 12/31/13?
Answer: 638.56
Question: and the difference between this value and the starting price in 12/31/08?
| 538.56 |
CONVFINQA6125 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of disca as of 12/31/13?
Answer: 638.56
Question: and the difference between this value and the starting price in 12/31/08?
Answer: 538.56
Question: so what was the percentage change?
| 5.3856 |
CONVFINQA6126 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .
Question: what were net capitalized costs in 2018?
| 25655931.0 |
CONVFINQA6127 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .
Question: what were net capitalized costs in 2018?
Answer: 25655931.0
Question: what were net capitalized costs in 2017?
| 23364494.0 |
CONVFINQA6128 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .
Question: what were net capitalized costs in 2018?
Answer: 25655931.0
Question: what were net capitalized costs in 2017?
Answer: 23364494.0
Question: what is the ratio of costs 2018 to 2017?
| 1.09807 |
CONVFINQA6129 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .
Question: what were net capitalized costs in 2018?
Answer: 25655931.0
Question: what were net capitalized costs in 2017?
Answer: 23364494.0
Question: what is the ratio of costs 2018 to 2017?
Answer: 1.09807
Question: what is that value less 1?
| 0.09807 |
CONVFINQA6130 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
financial assurance we must provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , or insurance policies ( financial assurance instruments ) , or trust deposits , which are included in restricted cash and marketable securities and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post-closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we must provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2016 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial assurance instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not considered indebtedness . because we currently have no liability for the financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets ; however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and insurance liabilities as they are incurred . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than operating leases and financial assurances , which are not classified as debt . we have no transactions or obligations with related parties that are not disclosed , consolidated into or reflected in our reported financial position or results of operations . we have not guaranteed any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . the following table calculates our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1679.7</td><td>$ 1529.8</td><td>$ 1548.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases of property and equipment</td><td>-945.6 ( 945.6 )</td><td>-862.5 ( 862.5 )</td><td>-880.8 ( 880.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from sales of property and equipment</td><td>21.2</td><td>35.7</td><td>23.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 755.3</td><td>$ 703.0</td><td>$ 691.3</td></tr></table> for a discussion of the changes in the components of free cash flow , see our discussion regarding cash flows provided by operating activities and cash flows used in investing activities contained elsewhere in this management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the change in the free cash flow from 2014 to 2015?
| 52.3 |
CONVFINQA6131 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
financial assurance we must provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , or insurance policies ( financial assurance instruments ) , or trust deposits , which are included in restricted cash and marketable securities and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post-closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we must provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2016 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial assurance instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not considered indebtedness . because we currently have no liability for the financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets ; however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and insurance liabilities as they are incurred . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than operating leases and financial assurances , which are not classified as debt . we have no transactions or obligations with related parties that are not disclosed , consolidated into or reflected in our reported financial position or results of operations . we have not guaranteed any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . the following table calculates our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1679.7</td><td>$ 1529.8</td><td>$ 1548.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases of property and equipment</td><td>-945.6 ( 945.6 )</td><td>-862.5 ( 862.5 )</td><td>-880.8 ( 880.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from sales of property and equipment</td><td>21.2</td><td>35.7</td><td>23.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 755.3</td><td>$ 703.0</td><td>$ 691.3</td></tr></table> for a discussion of the changes in the components of free cash flow , see our discussion regarding cash flows provided by operating activities and cash flows used in investing activities contained elsewhere in this management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the change in the free cash flow from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 52.3
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that free cash flow in 2014, in percentage?
| 0.0744 |
CONVFINQA6132 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of state street in 2009?
| 55.0 |
CONVFINQA6133 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of state street in 2009?
Answer: 55.0
Question: what was the initial value invested?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA6134 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of state street in 2009?
Answer: 55.0
Question: what was the initial value invested?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| -45.0 |
CONVFINQA6135 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of state street in 2009?
Answer: 55.0
Question: what was the initial value invested?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: -45.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.45 |
CONVFINQA6136 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements investments in funds that calculate net asset value per share cash instruments at fair value include investments in funds that are valued based on the net asset value per share ( nav ) of the investment fund . the firm uses nav as its measure of fair value for fund investments when ( i ) the fund investment does not have a readily determinable fair value and ( ii ) the nav of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of investment company accounting , including measurement of the underlying investments at fair value . the firm 2019s investments in funds that calculate nav primarily consist of investments in firm-sponsored funds where the firm co-invests with third-party investors . the private equity , credit and real estate funds are primarily closed-end funds in which the firm 2019s investments are not eligible for redemption . distributions will be received from these funds as the underlying assets are liquidated and it is estimated that substantially all of the underlying assets of existing funds will be liquidated over the next seven years . the firm continues to manage its existing funds taking into account the transition periods under the volcker rule of the u.s . dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act ( dodd-frank act ) , although the rules have not yet been finalized . the firm 2019s investments in hedge funds are generally redeemable on a quarterly basis with 91 days 2019 notice , subject to a maximum redemption level of 25% ( 25 % ) of the firm 2019s initial investments at any quarter-end . the firm currently plans to comply with the volcker rule by redeeming certain of its interests in hedge funds . the firm redeemed approximately $ 1.06 billion of these interests in hedge funds during the year ended december 2012 . the table below presents the fair value of the firm 2019s investments in , and unfunded commitments to , funds that calculate nav. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012 fair value of investments</td><td>as of december 2012 unfunded commitments</td><td>as of december 2012 fair value of investments</td><td>unfunded commitments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>private equity funds1</td><td>$ 7680</td><td>$ 2778</td><td>$ 8074</td><td>$ 3514</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit funds2</td><td>3927</td><td>2843</td><td>3596</td><td>3568</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>hedge funds3</td><td>2167</td><td>2014</td><td>3165</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>real estatefunds4</td><td>2006</td><td>870</td><td>1531</td><td>1613</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 15780</td><td>$ 6491</td><td>$ 16366</td><td>$ 8695</td></tr></table> 1 . these funds primarily invest in a broad range of industries worldwide in a variety of situations , including leveraged buyouts , recapitalizations and growth investments . 2 . these funds generally invest in loans and other fixed income instruments and are focused on providing private high-yield capital for mid- to large-sized leveraged and management buyout transactions , recapitalizations , financings , refinancings , acquisitions and restructurings for private equity firms , private family companies and corporate issuers . 3 . these funds are primarily multi-disciplinary hedge funds that employ a fundamental bottom-up investment approach across various asset classes and strategies including long/short equity , credit , convertibles , risk arbitrage , special situations and capital structure arbitrage . 4 . these funds invest globally , primarily in real estate companies , loan portfolios , debt recapitalizations and direct property . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 127 .
Question: what was the value of hedge fund investments in 2012?
| 2167.0 |
CONVFINQA6137 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements investments in funds that calculate net asset value per share cash instruments at fair value include investments in funds that are valued based on the net asset value per share ( nav ) of the investment fund . the firm uses nav as its measure of fair value for fund investments when ( i ) the fund investment does not have a readily determinable fair value and ( ii ) the nav of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of investment company accounting , including measurement of the underlying investments at fair value . the firm 2019s investments in funds that calculate nav primarily consist of investments in firm-sponsored funds where the firm co-invests with third-party investors . the private equity , credit and real estate funds are primarily closed-end funds in which the firm 2019s investments are not eligible for redemption . distributions will be received from these funds as the underlying assets are liquidated and it is estimated that substantially all of the underlying assets of existing funds will be liquidated over the next seven years . the firm continues to manage its existing funds taking into account the transition periods under the volcker rule of the u.s . dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act ( dodd-frank act ) , although the rules have not yet been finalized . the firm 2019s investments in hedge funds are generally redeemable on a quarterly basis with 91 days 2019 notice , subject to a maximum redemption level of 25% ( 25 % ) of the firm 2019s initial investments at any quarter-end . the firm currently plans to comply with the volcker rule by redeeming certain of its interests in hedge funds . the firm redeemed approximately $ 1.06 billion of these interests in hedge funds during the year ended december 2012 . the table below presents the fair value of the firm 2019s investments in , and unfunded commitments to , funds that calculate nav. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012 fair value of investments</td><td>as of december 2012 unfunded commitments</td><td>as of december 2012 fair value of investments</td><td>unfunded commitments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>private equity funds1</td><td>$ 7680</td><td>$ 2778</td><td>$ 8074</td><td>$ 3514</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit funds2</td><td>3927</td><td>2843</td><td>3596</td><td>3568</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>hedge funds3</td><td>2167</td><td>2014</td><td>3165</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>real estatefunds4</td><td>2006</td><td>870</td><td>1531</td><td>1613</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 15780</td><td>$ 6491</td><td>$ 16366</td><td>$ 8695</td></tr></table> 1 . these funds primarily invest in a broad range of industries worldwide in a variety of situations , including leveraged buyouts , recapitalizations and growth investments . 2 . these funds generally invest in loans and other fixed income instruments and are focused on providing private high-yield capital for mid- to large-sized leveraged and management buyout transactions , recapitalizations , financings , refinancings , acquisitions and restructurings for private equity firms , private family companies and corporate issuers . 3 . these funds are primarily multi-disciplinary hedge funds that employ a fundamental bottom-up investment approach across various asset classes and strategies including long/short equity , credit , convertibles , risk arbitrage , special situations and capital structure arbitrage . 4 . these funds invest globally , primarily in real estate companies , loan portfolios , debt recapitalizations and direct property . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 127 .
Question: what was the value of hedge fund investments in 2012?
Answer: 2167.0
Question: what is that value divided by 1000?
| 2.167 |
CONVFINQA6138 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements investments in funds that calculate net asset value per share cash instruments at fair value include investments in funds that are valued based on the net asset value per share ( nav ) of the investment fund . the firm uses nav as its measure of fair value for fund investments when ( i ) the fund investment does not have a readily determinable fair value and ( ii ) the nav of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of investment company accounting , including measurement of the underlying investments at fair value . the firm 2019s investments in funds that calculate nav primarily consist of investments in firm-sponsored funds where the firm co-invests with third-party investors . the private equity , credit and real estate funds are primarily closed-end funds in which the firm 2019s investments are not eligible for redemption . distributions will be received from these funds as the underlying assets are liquidated and it is estimated that substantially all of the underlying assets of existing funds will be liquidated over the next seven years . the firm continues to manage its existing funds taking into account the transition periods under the volcker rule of the u.s . dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act ( dodd-frank act ) , although the rules have not yet been finalized . the firm 2019s investments in hedge funds are generally redeemable on a quarterly basis with 91 days 2019 notice , subject to a maximum redemption level of 25% ( 25 % ) of the firm 2019s initial investments at any quarter-end . the firm currently plans to comply with the volcker rule by redeeming certain of its interests in hedge funds . the firm redeemed approximately $ 1.06 billion of these interests in hedge funds during the year ended december 2012 . the table below presents the fair value of the firm 2019s investments in , and unfunded commitments to , funds that calculate nav. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012 fair value of investments</td><td>as of december 2012 unfunded commitments</td><td>as of december 2012 fair value of investments</td><td>unfunded commitments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>private equity funds1</td><td>$ 7680</td><td>$ 2778</td><td>$ 8074</td><td>$ 3514</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit funds2</td><td>3927</td><td>2843</td><td>3596</td><td>3568</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>hedge funds3</td><td>2167</td><td>2014</td><td>3165</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>real estatefunds4</td><td>2006</td><td>870</td><td>1531</td><td>1613</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 15780</td><td>$ 6491</td><td>$ 16366</td><td>$ 8695</td></tr></table> 1 . these funds primarily invest in a broad range of industries worldwide in a variety of situations , including leveraged buyouts , recapitalizations and growth investments . 2 . these funds generally invest in loans and other fixed income instruments and are focused on providing private high-yield capital for mid- to large-sized leveraged and management buyout transactions , recapitalizations , financings , refinancings , acquisitions and restructurings for private equity firms , private family companies and corporate issuers . 3 . these funds are primarily multi-disciplinary hedge funds that employ a fundamental bottom-up investment approach across various asset classes and strategies including long/short equity , credit , convertibles , risk arbitrage , special situations and capital structure arbitrage . 4 . these funds invest globally , primarily in real estate companies , loan portfolios , debt recapitalizations and direct property . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 127 .
Question: what was the value of hedge fund investments in 2012?
Answer: 2167.0
Question: what is that value divided by 1000?
Answer: 2.167
Question: what is the total redeemed value of funds divided by the hedge fund investments value?
| 0.48916 |
CONVFINQA6139 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 1 ) the cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends . ( 2 ) the total return is weighted according to market capitalization of each company at the beginning of each year . ( f ) purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers we have not repurchased any of our common stock since the company filed its initial registration statement on march 16 , ( g ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans a description of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 6 . selected financial data . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td><td>$ 5692</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>290</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2490</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>110</td><td>248</td><td>211</td><td>-2354 ( 2354 )</td><td>447</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>135</td><td>124</td><td>-2420 ( 2420 )</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6001</td><td>5203</td><td>5036</td><td>4760</td><td>7658</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>3757</td><td>1559</td><td>1645</td><td>1761</td><td>1790</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .
Question: what was the operating income in 2011?
| 110.0 |
CONVFINQA6140 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 1 ) the cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends . ( 2 ) the total return is weighted according to market capitalization of each company at the beginning of each year . ( f ) purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers we have not repurchased any of our common stock since the company filed its initial registration statement on march 16 , ( g ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans a description of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 6 . selected financial data . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td><td>$ 5692</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>290</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2490</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>110</td><td>248</td><td>211</td><td>-2354 ( 2354 )</td><td>447</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>135</td><td>124</td><td>-2420 ( 2420 )</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6001</td><td>5203</td><td>5036</td><td>4760</td><td>7658</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>3757</td><td>1559</td><td>1645</td><td>1761</td><td>1790</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .
Question: what was the operating income in 2011?
Answer: 110.0
Question: and the goodwill impairment for that year?
| 290.0 |
CONVFINQA6141 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 1 ) the cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends . ( 2 ) the total return is weighted according to market capitalization of each company at the beginning of each year . ( f ) purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers we have not repurchased any of our common stock since the company filed its initial registration statement on march 16 , ( g ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans a description of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 6 . selected financial data . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td><td>$ 5692</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>290</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2490</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>110</td><td>248</td><td>211</td><td>-2354 ( 2354 )</td><td>447</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>135</td><td>124</td><td>-2420 ( 2420 )</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6001</td><td>5203</td><td>5036</td><td>4760</td><td>7658</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>3757</td><td>1559</td><td>1645</td><td>1761</td><td>1790</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .
Question: what was the operating income in 2011?
Answer: 110.0
Question: and the goodwill impairment for that year?
Answer: 290.0
Question: combined, what is the total amount of these two values?
| 400.0 |
CONVFINQA6142 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 1 ) the cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends . ( 2 ) the total return is weighted according to market capitalization of each company at the beginning of each year . ( f ) purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers we have not repurchased any of our common stock since the company filed its initial registration statement on march 16 , ( g ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans a description of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 6 . selected financial data . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td><td>$ 5692</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>290</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>2490</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>110</td><td>248</td><td>211</td><td>-2354 ( 2354 )</td><td>447</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>135</td><td>124</td><td>-2420 ( 2420 )</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6001</td><td>5203</td><td>5036</td><td>4760</td><td>7658</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>3757</td><td>1559</td><td>1645</td><td>1761</td><td>1790</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ -1.93 ( 1.93 )</td><td>$ 2.77</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ -49.61 ( 49.61 )</td><td>$ 5.65</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .
Question: what was the operating income in 2011?
Answer: 110.0
Question: and the goodwill impairment for that year?
Answer: 290.0
Question: combined, what is the total amount of these two values?
Answer: 400.0
Question: and converted to the millions?
| 400000000.0 |
CONVFINQA6143 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .
Question: what was the less accumulated amortization amount related to the intangible assets in 2005, in thousands of dollars?
| 646560.0 |
CONVFINQA6144 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .
Question: what was the less accumulated amortization amount related to the intangible assets in 2005, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 646560.0
Question: and how much is that in dollars?
| 646.56 |
CONVFINQA6145 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .
Question: what was the less accumulated amortization amount related to the intangible assets in 2005, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 646560.0
Question: and how much is that in dollars?
Answer: 646.56
Question: what will, then, be, in millions, the accumulated deprecation at the end of 2006, with the expected amortization expense?
| 830.16 |
CONVFINQA6146 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .
Question: what was the less accumulated amortization amount related to the intangible assets in 2005, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 646560.0
Question: and how much is that in dollars?
Answer: 646.56
Question: what will, then, be, in millions, the accumulated deprecation at the end of 2006, with the expected amortization expense?
Answer: 830.16
Question: and what was the decline in that expected expense from this year to 2007?
| 5.3 |
CONVFINQA6147 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .
Question: what was the less accumulated amortization amount related to the intangible assets in 2005, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 646560.0
Question: and how much is that in dollars?
Answer: 646.56
Question: what will, then, be, in millions, the accumulated deprecation at the end of 2006, with the expected amortization expense?
Answer: 830.16
Question: and what was the decline in that expected expense from this year to 2007?
Answer: 5.3
Question: what is this decline as a percentage of this expense in 2007?
| 0.02973 |
CONVFINQA6148 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 268</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>110</td><td>137</td><td>143</td><td>184</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 121</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 136</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net increase in a $100 investment in o 2019reilly automotive inc. from 2013 to 2017?
| 87.0 |
CONVFINQA6149 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 268</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>110</td><td>137</td><td>143</td><td>184</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 121</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 136</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net increase in a $100 investment in o 2019reilly automotive inc. from 2013 to 2017?
Answer: 87.0
Question: what is the initial investment?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA6150 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 268</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>110</td><td>137</td><td>143</td><td>184</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 121</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 136</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net increase in a $100 investment in o 2019reilly automotive inc. from 2013 to 2017?
Answer: 87.0
Question: what is the initial investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what roi does this represent?
| 0.87 |
CONVFINQA6151 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what was the change in the servicing fees from 1999 to 2000?
| 255.0 |
CONVFINQA6152 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what was the change in the servicing fees from 1999 to 2000?
Answer: 255.0
Question: and what were those fees in 1999?
| 1170.0 |
CONVFINQA6153 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what was the change in the servicing fees from 1999 to 2000?
Answer: 255.0
Question: and what were those fees in 1999?
Answer: 1170.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to these 1999 servicing fees, in percentage?
| 0.21795 |
CONVFINQA6154 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175 securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities borrowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase moni- tors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional collateral when appropriate . fees received or paid in connection with securities borrowed and lent are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the following table details the components of collateralized financings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 200265</td><td>$ 169305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>124000</td><td>84184</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 174456</td><td>$ 126098</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned</td><td>6077</td><td>10922</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.8 billion and $ 19.1 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 3.0 billion and $ 5.8 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to col- lateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheets . at december 31 , 2008 , the firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 511.9 billion . this collateral was generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 456.6 billion were repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales . note 14 2013 loans the accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is origi- nated or purchased and as to whether the loan is used in an invest- ing or trading strategy . for purchased loans held-for-investment , the accounting also differs depending on whether a loan is credit- impaired at the date of acquisition . purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since the origination date and for which it is probable , at acquisition , that all contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit-impaired . the measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of the following : 2022 at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees or costs , for loans held for investment ( other than purchased credit- impaired loans ) ; 2022 at the lower of cost or fair value , with valuation changes record- ed in noninterest revenue , for loans that are classified as held- for-sale ; or 2022 at fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue , for loans classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis ; 2022 purchased credit-impaired loans held for investment are account- ed for under sop 03-3 and initially measured at fair value , which includes estimated future credit losses . accordingly , an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date . see note 5 on pages 156 2013158 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s elections of fair value accounting under sfas 159 . see note 6 on pages 158 2013160 of this annual report for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets . for loans held for investment , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , interest income is recognized using the interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio . transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer . credit-related losses are charged off to the allowance for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates , or exchange rates , are recognized in noninterest revenue . loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value . these loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the firm 2019s allowance methodology . for a fur- ther discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses , see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is dis- continued . loans ( other than certain consumer and purchased credit- impaired loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of princi- pal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover principal and interest . loans are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortiza- tion of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate col- lectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans ( i.e. , the cost recovery method ) . loans are restored to accrual status only when future pay- ments of interest and principal are reasonably assured . consumer loans , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accordance with the federal financial institutions examination council policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiv- ing notification of the filing of bankruptcy , whichever is earlier . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net real- izable value at no later than 180 days past due . other consumer .
Question: in the year of 2008, how much did the securities borrowed represent in relation to the total of loaned ones?
| 20.40481 |
CONVFINQA6155 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175 securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities borrowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase moni- tors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional collateral when appropriate . fees received or paid in connection with securities borrowed and lent are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the following table details the components of collateralized financings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 200265</td><td>$ 169305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>124000</td><td>84184</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 174456</td><td>$ 126098</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned</td><td>6077</td><td>10922</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.8 billion and $ 19.1 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 3.0 billion and $ 5.8 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to col- lateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheets . at december 31 , 2008 , the firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 511.9 billion . this collateral was generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 456.6 billion were repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales . note 14 2013 loans the accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is origi- nated or purchased and as to whether the loan is used in an invest- ing or trading strategy . for purchased loans held-for-investment , the accounting also differs depending on whether a loan is credit- impaired at the date of acquisition . purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since the origination date and for which it is probable , at acquisition , that all contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit-impaired . the measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of the following : 2022 at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees or costs , for loans held for investment ( other than purchased credit- impaired loans ) ; 2022 at the lower of cost or fair value , with valuation changes record- ed in noninterest revenue , for loans that are classified as held- for-sale ; or 2022 at fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue , for loans classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis ; 2022 purchased credit-impaired loans held for investment are account- ed for under sop 03-3 and initially measured at fair value , which includes estimated future credit losses . accordingly , an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date . see note 5 on pages 156 2013158 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s elections of fair value accounting under sfas 159 . see note 6 on pages 158 2013160 of this annual report for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets . for loans held for investment , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , interest income is recognized using the interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio . transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer . credit-related losses are charged off to the allowance for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates , or exchange rates , are recognized in noninterest revenue . loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value . these loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the firm 2019s allowance methodology . for a fur- ther discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses , see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is dis- continued . loans ( other than certain consumer and purchased credit- impaired loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of princi- pal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover principal and interest . loans are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortiza- tion of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate col- lectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans ( i.e. , the cost recovery method ) . loans are restored to accrual status only when future pay- ments of interest and principal are reasonably assured . consumer loans , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accordance with the federal financial institutions examination council policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiv- ing notification of the filing of bankruptcy , whichever is earlier . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net real- izable value at no later than 180 days past due . other consumer .
Question: in the year of 2008, how much did the securities borrowed represent in relation to the total of loaned ones?
Answer: 20.40481
Question: and as of december 31 of that year, what portion of the securities received as collateral that could be repledged, delivered or otherwise used, were actually repledged, delivered or otherwise used?
| 0.89197 |
CONVFINQA6156 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying rr values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . during 2016 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying rr amount of $ 643 million were written down to their fair value of $ 527 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 116 million . impairments in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 211 million , $ 291 million and $ 288 million during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 912926</td><td>$ 811554</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred ( 1 )</td><td>54764</td><td>212739</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 2 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td><td>-94800 ( 94800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>34708</td><td>32306</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td><td>-38286 ( 38286 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>16139</td><td>-10587 ( 10587 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 19259</td><td>$ 18516</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 927589</td><td>$ 894410</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 164 million in 2016 related to yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . ( 2 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the ratio of 2017 accretion to 2016?
| 1.07435 |
CONVFINQA6157 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying rr values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . during 2016 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying rr amount of $ 643 million were written down to their fair value of $ 527 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 116 million . impairments in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 211 million , $ 291 million and $ 288 million during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 912926</td><td>$ 811554</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred ( 1 )</td><td>54764</td><td>212739</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 2 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td><td>-94800 ( 94800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>34708</td><td>32306</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td><td>-38286 ( 38286 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>16139</td><td>-10587 ( 10587 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 19259</td><td>$ 18516</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 927589</td><td>$ 894410</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 164 million in 2016 related to yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . ( 2 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the ratio of 2017 accretion to 2016?
Answer: 1.07435
Question: what is that less 1?
| 0.07435 |
CONVFINQA6158 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 triggering our obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee , letter of credit or other credit support we have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary ; 2022 causing us to record a loss in the event the lender forecloses on the assets ; and 2022 triggering defaults in our outstanding debt at the parent company . for example , our senior secured credit facility and outstanding debt securities at the parent company include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries . in addition , our revolving credit agreement at the parent company includes events of default related to payment defaults and accelerations of outstanding debt of material subsidiaries . some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness . the total non-recourse debt classified as current in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets amounts to $ 2.2 billion . the portion of current debt related to such defaults was $ 1 billion at december 31 , 2017 , all of which was non-recourse debt related to three subsidiaries 2014 alto maipo , aes puerto rico , and aes ilumina . see note 10 2014debt in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k for additional detail . none of the subsidiaries that are currently in default are subsidiaries that met the applicable definition of materiality under aes' corporate debt agreements as of december 31 , 2017 in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under aes' indebtedness . however , as a result of additional dispositions of assets , other significant reductions in asset carrying values or other matters in the future that may impact our financial position and results of operations or the financial position of the individual subsidiary , it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries could fall within the definition of a "material subsidiary" and thereby upon an acceleration trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under the parent company's outstanding debt securities . a material subsidiary is defined in the company's senior secured revolving credit facility as any business that contributed 20% ( 20 % ) or more of the parent company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters . as of december 31 , 2017 , none of the defaults listed above individually or in the aggregate results in or is at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the company . contractual obligations and parent company contingent contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations , commitments and other liabilities as of december 31 , 2017 is presented below and excludes any businesses classified as discontinued operations or held-for-sale ( in millions ) : contractual obligations total less than 1 year more than 5 years other footnote reference ( 4 ) debt obligations ( 1 ) $ 20404 $ 2250 $ 2431 $ 5003 $ 10720 $ 2014 10 interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 ) 9103 1172 2166 1719 4046 2014 n/a . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td><td>other</td><td>footnote reference ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 20404</td><td>$ 2250</td><td>$ 2431</td><td>$ 5003</td><td>$ 10720</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 )</td><td>9103</td><td>1172</td><td>2166</td><td>1719</td><td>4046</td><td>2014</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>18</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>935</td><td>58</td><td>116</td><td>117</td><td>644</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity obligations</td><td>4501</td><td>581</td><td>948</td><td>907</td><td>2065</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel obligations</td><td>5859</td><td>1759</td><td>1642</td><td>992</td><td>1466</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other purchase obligations</td><td>4984</td><td>1488</td><td>1401</td><td>781</td><td>1314</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected on aes' consolidated balance sheet under gaap ( 3 )</td><td>701</td><td>2014</td><td>284</td><td>118</td><td>277</td><td>22</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 46505</td><td>$ 7310</td><td>$ 8990</td><td>$ 9639</td><td>$ 20544</td><td>$ 22</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes recourse and non-recourse debt presented on the consolidated balance sheet . these amounts exclude capital lease obligations which are included in the capital lease category . ( 2 ) interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at december 31 , 2017 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing , early redemptions or new debt issuances . variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) these amounts do not include current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations . noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "other" column of the table above as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments . in addition , these amounts do not include : ( 1 ) regulatory liabilities ( see note 9 2014regulatory assets and liabilities ) , ( 2 ) contingencies ( see note 12 2014contingencies ) , ( 3 ) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities ( see note 13 2014benefit plans ) , ( 4 ) derivatives and incentive compensation ( see note 5 2014derivative instruments and hedging activities ) or ( 5 ) any taxes ( see note 20 2014income taxes ) except for uncertain tax obligations , as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments . see the indicated notes to the consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information on the items excluded . ( 4 ) for further information see the note referenced below in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k. .
Question: what are total debt obligations?
| 20404.0 |
CONVFINQA6159 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 triggering our obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee , letter of credit or other credit support we have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary ; 2022 causing us to record a loss in the event the lender forecloses on the assets ; and 2022 triggering defaults in our outstanding debt at the parent company . for example , our senior secured credit facility and outstanding debt securities at the parent company include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries . in addition , our revolving credit agreement at the parent company includes events of default related to payment defaults and accelerations of outstanding debt of material subsidiaries . some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness . the total non-recourse debt classified as current in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets amounts to $ 2.2 billion . the portion of current debt related to such defaults was $ 1 billion at december 31 , 2017 , all of which was non-recourse debt related to three subsidiaries 2014 alto maipo , aes puerto rico , and aes ilumina . see note 10 2014debt in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k for additional detail . none of the subsidiaries that are currently in default are subsidiaries that met the applicable definition of materiality under aes' corporate debt agreements as of december 31 , 2017 in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under aes' indebtedness . however , as a result of additional dispositions of assets , other significant reductions in asset carrying values or other matters in the future that may impact our financial position and results of operations or the financial position of the individual subsidiary , it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries could fall within the definition of a "material subsidiary" and thereby upon an acceleration trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under the parent company's outstanding debt securities . a material subsidiary is defined in the company's senior secured revolving credit facility as any business that contributed 20% ( 20 % ) or more of the parent company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters . as of december 31 , 2017 , none of the defaults listed above individually or in the aggregate results in or is at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the company . contractual obligations and parent company contingent contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations , commitments and other liabilities as of december 31 , 2017 is presented below and excludes any businesses classified as discontinued operations or held-for-sale ( in millions ) : contractual obligations total less than 1 year more than 5 years other footnote reference ( 4 ) debt obligations ( 1 ) $ 20404 $ 2250 $ 2431 $ 5003 $ 10720 $ 2014 10 interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 ) 9103 1172 2166 1719 4046 2014 n/a . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td><td>other</td><td>footnote reference ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 20404</td><td>$ 2250</td><td>$ 2431</td><td>$ 5003</td><td>$ 10720</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 )</td><td>9103</td><td>1172</td><td>2166</td><td>1719</td><td>4046</td><td>2014</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>18</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>935</td><td>58</td><td>116</td><td>117</td><td>644</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity obligations</td><td>4501</td><td>581</td><td>948</td><td>907</td><td>2065</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel obligations</td><td>5859</td><td>1759</td><td>1642</td><td>992</td><td>1466</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other purchase obligations</td><td>4984</td><td>1488</td><td>1401</td><td>781</td><td>1314</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected on aes' consolidated balance sheet under gaap ( 3 )</td><td>701</td><td>2014</td><td>284</td><td>118</td><td>277</td><td>22</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 46505</td><td>$ 7310</td><td>$ 8990</td><td>$ 9639</td><td>$ 20544</td><td>$ 22</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes recourse and non-recourse debt presented on the consolidated balance sheet . these amounts exclude capital lease obligations which are included in the capital lease category . ( 2 ) interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at december 31 , 2017 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing , early redemptions or new debt issuances . variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) these amounts do not include current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations . noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "other" column of the table above as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments . in addition , these amounts do not include : ( 1 ) regulatory liabilities ( see note 9 2014regulatory assets and liabilities ) , ( 2 ) contingencies ( see note 12 2014contingencies ) , ( 3 ) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities ( see note 13 2014benefit plans ) , ( 4 ) derivatives and incentive compensation ( see note 5 2014derivative instruments and hedging activities ) or ( 5 ) any taxes ( see note 20 2014income taxes ) except for uncertain tax obligations , as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments . see the indicated notes to the consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information on the items excluded . ( 4 ) for further information see the note referenced below in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k. .
Question: what are total debt obligations?
Answer: 20404.0
Question: what is the value of debt obligations due in under 1 year?
| 2250.0 |
CONVFINQA6160 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 triggering our obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee , letter of credit or other credit support we have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary ; 2022 causing us to record a loss in the event the lender forecloses on the assets ; and 2022 triggering defaults in our outstanding debt at the parent company . for example , our senior secured credit facility and outstanding debt securities at the parent company include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries . in addition , our revolving credit agreement at the parent company includes events of default related to payment defaults and accelerations of outstanding debt of material subsidiaries . some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness . the total non-recourse debt classified as current in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets amounts to $ 2.2 billion . the portion of current debt related to such defaults was $ 1 billion at december 31 , 2017 , all of which was non-recourse debt related to three subsidiaries 2014 alto maipo , aes puerto rico , and aes ilumina . see note 10 2014debt in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k for additional detail . none of the subsidiaries that are currently in default are subsidiaries that met the applicable definition of materiality under aes' corporate debt agreements as of december 31 , 2017 in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under aes' indebtedness . however , as a result of additional dispositions of assets , other significant reductions in asset carrying values or other matters in the future that may impact our financial position and results of operations or the financial position of the individual subsidiary , it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries could fall within the definition of a "material subsidiary" and thereby upon an acceleration trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under the parent company's outstanding debt securities . a material subsidiary is defined in the company's senior secured revolving credit facility as any business that contributed 20% ( 20 % ) or more of the parent company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters . as of december 31 , 2017 , none of the defaults listed above individually or in the aggregate results in or is at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the company . contractual obligations and parent company contingent contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations , commitments and other liabilities as of december 31 , 2017 is presented below and excludes any businesses classified as discontinued operations or held-for-sale ( in millions ) : contractual obligations total less than 1 year more than 5 years other footnote reference ( 4 ) debt obligations ( 1 ) $ 20404 $ 2250 $ 2431 $ 5003 $ 10720 $ 2014 10 interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 ) 9103 1172 2166 1719 4046 2014 n/a . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td><td>other</td><td>footnote reference ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 20404</td><td>$ 2250</td><td>$ 2431</td><td>$ 5003</td><td>$ 10720</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 )</td><td>9103</td><td>1172</td><td>2166</td><td>1719</td><td>4046</td><td>2014</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>18</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>935</td><td>58</td><td>116</td><td>117</td><td>644</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity obligations</td><td>4501</td><td>581</td><td>948</td><td>907</td><td>2065</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel obligations</td><td>5859</td><td>1759</td><td>1642</td><td>992</td><td>1466</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other purchase obligations</td><td>4984</td><td>1488</td><td>1401</td><td>781</td><td>1314</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected on aes' consolidated balance sheet under gaap ( 3 )</td><td>701</td><td>2014</td><td>284</td><td>118</td><td>277</td><td>22</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 46505</td><td>$ 7310</td><td>$ 8990</td><td>$ 9639</td><td>$ 20544</td><td>$ 22</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes recourse and non-recourse debt presented on the consolidated balance sheet . these amounts exclude capital lease obligations which are included in the capital lease category . ( 2 ) interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at december 31 , 2017 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing , early redemptions or new debt issuances . variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) these amounts do not include current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations . noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "other" column of the table above as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments . in addition , these amounts do not include : ( 1 ) regulatory liabilities ( see note 9 2014regulatory assets and liabilities ) , ( 2 ) contingencies ( see note 12 2014contingencies ) , ( 3 ) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities ( see note 13 2014benefit plans ) , ( 4 ) derivatives and incentive compensation ( see note 5 2014derivative instruments and hedging activities ) or ( 5 ) any taxes ( see note 20 2014income taxes ) except for uncertain tax obligations , as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments . see the indicated notes to the consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information on the items excluded . ( 4 ) for further information see the note referenced below in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k. .
Question: what are total debt obligations?
Answer: 20404.0
Question: what is the value of debt obligations due in under 1 year?
Answer: 2250.0
Question: what is the value of total debt obligations less those due in under 1 year?
| 18154.0 |
CONVFINQA6161 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 triggering our obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee , letter of credit or other credit support we have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary ; 2022 causing us to record a loss in the event the lender forecloses on the assets ; and 2022 triggering defaults in our outstanding debt at the parent company . for example , our senior secured credit facility and outstanding debt securities at the parent company include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries . in addition , our revolving credit agreement at the parent company includes events of default related to payment defaults and accelerations of outstanding debt of material subsidiaries . some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness . the total non-recourse debt classified as current in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets amounts to $ 2.2 billion . the portion of current debt related to such defaults was $ 1 billion at december 31 , 2017 , all of which was non-recourse debt related to three subsidiaries 2014 alto maipo , aes puerto rico , and aes ilumina . see note 10 2014debt in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k for additional detail . none of the subsidiaries that are currently in default are subsidiaries that met the applicable definition of materiality under aes' corporate debt agreements as of december 31 , 2017 in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under aes' indebtedness . however , as a result of additional dispositions of assets , other significant reductions in asset carrying values or other matters in the future that may impact our financial position and results of operations or the financial position of the individual subsidiary , it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries could fall within the definition of a "material subsidiary" and thereby upon an acceleration trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under the parent company's outstanding debt securities . a material subsidiary is defined in the company's senior secured revolving credit facility as any business that contributed 20% ( 20 % ) or more of the parent company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters . as of december 31 , 2017 , none of the defaults listed above individually or in the aggregate results in or is at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the company . contractual obligations and parent company contingent contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations , commitments and other liabilities as of december 31 , 2017 is presented below and excludes any businesses classified as discontinued operations or held-for-sale ( in millions ) : contractual obligations total less than 1 year more than 5 years other footnote reference ( 4 ) debt obligations ( 1 ) $ 20404 $ 2250 $ 2431 $ 5003 $ 10720 $ 2014 10 interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 ) 9103 1172 2166 1719 4046 2014 n/a . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td><td>other</td><td>footnote reference ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 20404</td><td>$ 2250</td><td>$ 2431</td><td>$ 5003</td><td>$ 10720</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 2 )</td><td>9103</td><td>1172</td><td>2166</td><td>1719</td><td>4046</td><td>2014</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>18</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>935</td><td>58</td><td>116</td><td>117</td><td>644</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity obligations</td><td>4501</td><td>581</td><td>948</td><td>907</td><td>2065</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel obligations</td><td>5859</td><td>1759</td><td>1642</td><td>992</td><td>1466</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other purchase obligations</td><td>4984</td><td>1488</td><td>1401</td><td>781</td><td>1314</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other long-term liabilities reflected on aes' consolidated balance sheet under gaap ( 3 )</td><td>701</td><td>2014</td><td>284</td><td>118</td><td>277</td><td>22</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 46505</td><td>$ 7310</td><td>$ 8990</td><td>$ 9639</td><td>$ 20544</td><td>$ 22</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _____________________________ ( 1 ) includes recourse and non-recourse debt presented on the consolidated balance sheet . these amounts exclude capital lease obligations which are included in the capital lease category . ( 2 ) interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at december 31 , 2017 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing , early redemptions or new debt issuances . variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) these amounts do not include current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations . noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "other" column of the table above as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments . in addition , these amounts do not include : ( 1 ) regulatory liabilities ( see note 9 2014regulatory assets and liabilities ) , ( 2 ) contingencies ( see note 12 2014contingencies ) , ( 3 ) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities ( see note 13 2014benefit plans ) , ( 4 ) derivatives and incentive compensation ( see note 5 2014derivative instruments and hedging activities ) or ( 5 ) any taxes ( see note 20 2014income taxes ) except for uncertain tax obligations , as the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments . see the indicated notes to the consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information on the items excluded . ( 4 ) for further information see the note referenced below in item 8 . 2014financial statements and supplementary data of this form 10-k. .
Question: what are total debt obligations?
Answer: 20404.0
Question: what is the value of debt obligations due in under 1 year?
Answer: 2250.0
Question: what is the value of total debt obligations less those due in under 1 year?
Answer: 18154.0
Question: what is that divided by total debt obligations?
| 0.88973 |
CONVFINQA6162 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2006 , we had outstanding 53 mortgage loans that we assumed in connection with various acquisitions . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.6% ( 5.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except with respect to eight loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates , ranging from 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum at of december 31 , 2006 . the fixed rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 7.06% ( 7.06 % ) and the variable rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans had a weighted average maturity of eight years as of december 31 , 2006 . the $ 114.4 variable mortgage debt was repaid in january 2007 . scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2006 , our indebtedness has the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 130206</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>33117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>372725</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>265915</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>273761</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1261265</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>2336989</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-7936 ( 7936 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 2329053</td></tr></table> certain provisions of our long-term debt contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to , among other things : ( i ) incur debt ; ( ii ) make certain dividends , distributions and investments ; ( iii ) enter into certain transactions ; ( iv ) merge , consolidate or transfer certain assets ; and ( v ) sell assets . we and certain of our subsidiaries are also required to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% ( 150 % ) of this group 2019s unsecured debt . derivatives and hedging in the normal course of business , we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes . we limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives . for interest rate exposures , derivatives are used primarily to fix the rate on debt based on floating-rate indices and to manage the cost of borrowing obligations . we currently have an interest rate swap to manage interest rate risk ( the 201cswap 201d ) . we prohibit the use of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes . further , we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors . when viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge , we do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives. .
Question: what were the maturities in 2010?
| 265915.0 |
CONVFINQA6163 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2006 , we had outstanding 53 mortgage loans that we assumed in connection with various acquisitions . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.6% ( 5.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except with respect to eight loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates , ranging from 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum at of december 31 , 2006 . the fixed rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 7.06% ( 7.06 % ) and the variable rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans had a weighted average maturity of eight years as of december 31 , 2006 . the $ 114.4 variable mortgage debt was repaid in january 2007 . scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2006 , our indebtedness has the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 130206</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>33117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>372725</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>265915</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>273761</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1261265</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>2336989</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-7936 ( 7936 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 2329053</td></tr></table> certain provisions of our long-term debt contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to , among other things : ( i ) incur debt ; ( ii ) make certain dividends , distributions and investments ; ( iii ) enter into certain transactions ; ( iv ) merge , consolidate or transfer certain assets ; and ( v ) sell assets . we and certain of our subsidiaries are also required to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% ( 150 % ) of this group 2019s unsecured debt . derivatives and hedging in the normal course of business , we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes . we limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives . for interest rate exposures , derivatives are used primarily to fix the rate on debt based on floating-rate indices and to manage the cost of borrowing obligations . we currently have an interest rate swap to manage interest rate risk ( the 201cswap 201d ) . we prohibit the use of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes . further , we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors . when viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge , we do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives. .
Question: what were the maturities in 2010?
Answer: 265915.0
Question: and in 2009?
| 372725.0 |
CONVFINQA6164 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2006 , we had outstanding 53 mortgage loans that we assumed in connection with various acquisitions . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.6% ( 5.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except with respect to eight loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates , ranging from 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum at of december 31 , 2006 . the fixed rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 7.06% ( 7.06 % ) and the variable rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans had a weighted average maturity of eight years as of december 31 , 2006 . the $ 114.4 variable mortgage debt was repaid in january 2007 . scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2006 , our indebtedness has the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 130206</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>33117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>372725</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>265915</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>273761</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1261265</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>2336989</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-7936 ( 7936 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 2329053</td></tr></table> certain provisions of our long-term debt contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to , among other things : ( i ) incur debt ; ( ii ) make certain dividends , distributions and investments ; ( iii ) enter into certain transactions ; ( iv ) merge , consolidate or transfer certain assets ; and ( v ) sell assets . we and certain of our subsidiaries are also required to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% ( 150 % ) of this group 2019s unsecured debt . derivatives and hedging in the normal course of business , we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes . we limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives . for interest rate exposures , derivatives are used primarily to fix the rate on debt based on floating-rate indices and to manage the cost of borrowing obligations . we currently have an interest rate swap to manage interest rate risk ( the 201cswap 201d ) . we prohibit the use of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes . further , we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors . when viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge , we do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives. .
Question: what were the maturities in 2010?
Answer: 265915.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 372725.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
| -106810.0 |
CONVFINQA6165 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2006 , we had outstanding 53 mortgage loans that we assumed in connection with various acquisitions . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.6% ( 5.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except with respect to eight loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates , ranging from 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum at of december 31 , 2006 . the fixed rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 7.06% ( 7.06 % ) and the variable rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans had a weighted average maturity of eight years as of december 31 , 2006 . the $ 114.4 variable mortgage debt was repaid in january 2007 . scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2006 , our indebtedness has the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 130206</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>33117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>372725</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>265915</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>273761</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1261265</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>2336989</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-7936 ( 7936 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 2329053</td></tr></table> certain provisions of our long-term debt contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to , among other things : ( i ) incur debt ; ( ii ) make certain dividends , distributions and investments ; ( iii ) enter into certain transactions ; ( iv ) merge , consolidate or transfer certain assets ; and ( v ) sell assets . we and certain of our subsidiaries are also required to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% ( 150 % ) of this group 2019s unsecured debt . derivatives and hedging in the normal course of business , we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes . we limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives . for interest rate exposures , derivatives are used primarily to fix the rate on debt based on floating-rate indices and to manage the cost of borrowing obligations . we currently have an interest rate swap to manage interest rate risk ( the 201cswap 201d ) . we prohibit the use of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes . further , we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors . when viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge , we do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives. .
Question: what were the maturities in 2010?
Answer: 265915.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 372725.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: -106810.0
Question: and the percentage change?
| -0.40167 |
CONVFINQA6166 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future minimum lease commitments for office premises and equipment under non-cancelable leases , along with minimum sublease rental income to be received under non-cancelable subleases , are as follows : period rent obligations sublease rental income net rent . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>rent obligations</td><td>sublease rental income</td><td>net rent</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 323.9</td><td>$ -40.9 ( 40.9 )</td><td>$ 283.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>300.9</td><td>-37.5 ( 37.5 )</td><td>263.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>267.7</td><td>-31.0 ( 31.0 )</td><td>236.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>233.7</td><td>-25.7 ( 25.7 )</td><td>208.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>197.9</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>177.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2013 and thereafter</td><td>871.0</td><td>-33.1 ( 33.1 )</td><td>837.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2195.1</td><td>$ -188.4 ( 188.4 )</td><td>$ 2006.7</td></tr></table> guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 327.1 and $ 327.9 as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , we recognize deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase that are contingent upon the future employment of owners as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid under the options , in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) .
Question: in 2008, what amount from the rent obligations will be paid-off through sublease rental income?
| 40.9 |
CONVFINQA6167 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future minimum lease commitments for office premises and equipment under non-cancelable leases , along with minimum sublease rental income to be received under non-cancelable subleases , are as follows : period rent obligations sublease rental income net rent . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>rent obligations</td><td>sublease rental income</td><td>net rent</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 323.9</td><td>$ -40.9 ( 40.9 )</td><td>$ 283.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>300.9</td><td>-37.5 ( 37.5 )</td><td>263.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>267.7</td><td>-31.0 ( 31.0 )</td><td>236.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>233.7</td><td>-25.7 ( 25.7 )</td><td>208.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>197.9</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>177.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2013 and thereafter</td><td>871.0</td><td>-33.1 ( 33.1 )</td><td>837.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2195.1</td><td>$ -188.4 ( 188.4 )</td><td>$ 2006.7</td></tr></table> guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 327.1 and $ 327.9 as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , we recognize deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase that are contingent upon the future employment of owners as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid under the options , in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) .
Question: in 2008, what amount from the rent obligations will be paid-off through sublease rental income?
Answer: 40.9
Question: and what is the total of those rent obligations?
| 323.9 |
CONVFINQA6168 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future minimum lease commitments for office premises and equipment under non-cancelable leases , along with minimum sublease rental income to be received under non-cancelable subleases , are as follows : period rent obligations sublease rental income net rent . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>rent obligations</td><td>sublease rental income</td><td>net rent</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 323.9</td><td>$ -40.9 ( 40.9 )</td><td>$ 283.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>300.9</td><td>-37.5 ( 37.5 )</td><td>263.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>267.7</td><td>-31.0 ( 31.0 )</td><td>236.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>233.7</td><td>-25.7 ( 25.7 )</td><td>208.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>197.9</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>177.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2013 and thereafter</td><td>871.0</td><td>-33.1 ( 33.1 )</td><td>837.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2195.1</td><td>$ -188.4 ( 188.4 )</td><td>$ 2006.7</td></tr></table> guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 327.1 and $ 327.9 as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , we recognize deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase that are contingent upon the future employment of owners as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid under the options , in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) .
Question: in 2008, what amount from the rent obligations will be paid-off through sublease rental income?
Answer: 40.9
Question: and what is the total of those rent obligations?
Answer: 323.9
Question: what portion, then, of this total does that amount represent?
| 0.12627 |
CONVFINQA6169 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future minimum lease commitments for office premises and equipment under non-cancelable leases , along with minimum sublease rental income to be received under non-cancelable subleases , are as follows : period rent obligations sublease rental income net rent . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>rent obligations</td><td>sublease rental income</td><td>net rent</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 323.9</td><td>$ -40.9 ( 40.9 )</td><td>$ 283.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>300.9</td><td>-37.5 ( 37.5 )</td><td>263.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>267.7</td><td>-31.0 ( 31.0 )</td><td>236.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>233.7</td><td>-25.7 ( 25.7 )</td><td>208.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>197.9</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>177.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2013 and thereafter</td><td>871.0</td><td>-33.1 ( 33.1 )</td><td>837.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2195.1</td><td>$ -188.4 ( 188.4 )</td><td>$ 2006.7</td></tr></table> guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 327.1 and $ 327.9 as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , we recognize deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase that are contingent upon the future employment of owners as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid under the options , in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) .
Question: in 2008, what amount from the rent obligations will be paid-off through sublease rental income?
Answer: 40.9
Question: and what is the total of those rent obligations?
Answer: 323.9
Question: what portion, then, of this total does that amount represent?
Answer: 0.12627
Question: and considering the values for all years, what becomes this ratio, or portion?
| 0.08583 |
CONVFINQA6170 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total rent expense under operating leases in 2007?
| 43.0 |
CONVFINQA6171 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total rent expense under operating leases in 2007?
Answer: 43.0
Question: and in 2006?
| 45.0 |
CONVFINQA6172 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total rent expense under operating leases in 2007?
Answer: 43.0
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 45.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
| -2.0 |
CONVFINQA6173 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total rent expense under operating leases in 2007?
Answer: 43.0
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 45.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: -2.0
Question: and the specific value for 2006 again?
| 45.0 |
CONVFINQA6174 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total rent expense under operating leases in 2007?
Answer: 43.0
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 45.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: -2.0
Question: and the specific value for 2006 again?
Answer: 45.0
Question: so what was the growth rate during this time?
| -0.04444 |
CONVFINQA6175 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
30 2018 ppg annual report and 10-k foreign currency translation partially offset by : cost reclassifications associated with the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard . refer to note 2 , "revenue recognition" within part 2 of this form 10-k cost management including restructuring cost savings 2017 vs . 2016 selling , general and administrative expenses decreased $ 1 million primarily due to : lower net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs lower selling and advertising costs restructuring cost savings partially offset by : wage and other cost inflation selling , general and administrative expenses from acquired businesses foreign currency translation other charges and other income . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except percentages )</td><td>2018</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2016</td><td>% ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense net of interest income</td><td>$ 95</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 99</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>( 14.1 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>business restructuring net</td><td>$ 66</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 191</td><td>n/a</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension settlement charges</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 60</td><td>$ 968</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 93.8 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other charges</td><td>$ 122</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 242</td><td>64.9% ( 64.9 % )</td><td>( 69.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other income</td><td>( $ 114 )</td><td>( $ 150 )</td><td>( $ 127 )</td><td>( 24.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>18.1% ( 18.1 % )</td></tr></table> interest expense , net of interest income interest expense , net of interest income increased $ 10 million in 2018 versus 2017 primarily due to the issuance of long- term debt in early 2018 . interest expense , net of interest income decreased $ 14 million in 2017 versus 2016 due to lower interest rate debt outstanding in 2017 . business restructuring , net a pretax restructuring charge of $ 83 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2018 , offset by certain changes in estimates to complete previously recorded programs of $ 17 million . a pretax charge of $ 191 million was recorded in 2016 . refer to note 8 , "business restructuring" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . pension settlement charges during 2017 , ppg made lump-sum payments to certain retirees who had participated in ppg's u.s . qualified and non- qualified pension plans totaling approximately $ 127 million . as the lump-sum payments were in excess of the expected 2017 service and interest costs for the affected plans , ppg remeasured the periodic benefit obligation of these plans in the period payments were made and recorded settlement charges totaling $ 60 million ( $ 38 million after-tax ) during 2017 . during 2016 , ppg permanently transferred approximately $ 1.8 billion of its u.s . and canadian pension obligations and assets to several highly rated insurance companies . these actions triggered remeasurement and partial settlement of certain of the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans . ppg recognized a $ 968 million pre-tax settlement charge in connection with these transactions . refer to note 13 , "employee benefit plans" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other charges other charges in 2018 and 2016 were higher than 2017 primarily due to environmental remediation charges . these charges were principally for environmental remediation at a former chromium manufacturing plant and associated sites in new jersey . refer to note 14 , "commitments and contingent liabilities" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other income other income was lower in 2018 and 2016 than in 2017 primarily due to the gain from the sale of the mexican plaka business of $ 25 million and income from a legal settlement of $ 18 million in 2017 . refer to note 3 , "acquisitions and divestitures" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what was the net interest expense in 2019?
| 95.0 |
CONVFINQA6176 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
30 2018 ppg annual report and 10-k foreign currency translation partially offset by : cost reclassifications associated with the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard . refer to note 2 , "revenue recognition" within part 2 of this form 10-k cost management including restructuring cost savings 2017 vs . 2016 selling , general and administrative expenses decreased $ 1 million primarily due to : lower net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs lower selling and advertising costs restructuring cost savings partially offset by : wage and other cost inflation selling , general and administrative expenses from acquired businesses foreign currency translation other charges and other income . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except percentages )</td><td>2018</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2016</td><td>% ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense net of interest income</td><td>$ 95</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 99</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>( 14.1 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>business restructuring net</td><td>$ 66</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 191</td><td>n/a</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension settlement charges</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 60</td><td>$ 968</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 93.8 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other charges</td><td>$ 122</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 242</td><td>64.9% ( 64.9 % )</td><td>( 69.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other income</td><td>( $ 114 )</td><td>( $ 150 )</td><td>( $ 127 )</td><td>( 24.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>18.1% ( 18.1 % )</td></tr></table> interest expense , net of interest income interest expense , net of interest income increased $ 10 million in 2018 versus 2017 primarily due to the issuance of long- term debt in early 2018 . interest expense , net of interest income decreased $ 14 million in 2017 versus 2016 due to lower interest rate debt outstanding in 2017 . business restructuring , net a pretax restructuring charge of $ 83 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2018 , offset by certain changes in estimates to complete previously recorded programs of $ 17 million . a pretax charge of $ 191 million was recorded in 2016 . refer to note 8 , "business restructuring" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . pension settlement charges during 2017 , ppg made lump-sum payments to certain retirees who had participated in ppg's u.s . qualified and non- qualified pension plans totaling approximately $ 127 million . as the lump-sum payments were in excess of the expected 2017 service and interest costs for the affected plans , ppg remeasured the periodic benefit obligation of these plans in the period payments were made and recorded settlement charges totaling $ 60 million ( $ 38 million after-tax ) during 2017 . during 2016 , ppg permanently transferred approximately $ 1.8 billion of its u.s . and canadian pension obligations and assets to several highly rated insurance companies . these actions triggered remeasurement and partial settlement of certain of the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans . ppg recognized a $ 968 million pre-tax settlement charge in connection with these transactions . refer to note 13 , "employee benefit plans" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other charges other charges in 2018 and 2016 were higher than 2017 primarily due to environmental remediation charges . these charges were principally for environmental remediation at a former chromium manufacturing plant and associated sites in new jersey . refer to note 14 , "commitments and contingent liabilities" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other income other income was lower in 2018 and 2016 than in 2017 primarily due to the gain from the sale of the mexican plaka business of $ 25 million and income from a legal settlement of $ 18 million in 2017 . refer to note 3 , "acquisitions and divestitures" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what was the net interest expense in 2019?
Answer: 95.0
Question: what was it in 2018?
| 85.0 |
CONVFINQA6177 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
30 2018 ppg annual report and 10-k foreign currency translation partially offset by : cost reclassifications associated with the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard . refer to note 2 , "revenue recognition" within part 2 of this form 10-k cost management including restructuring cost savings 2017 vs . 2016 selling , general and administrative expenses decreased $ 1 million primarily due to : lower net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs lower selling and advertising costs restructuring cost savings partially offset by : wage and other cost inflation selling , general and administrative expenses from acquired businesses foreign currency translation other charges and other income . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except percentages )</td><td>2018</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2016</td><td>% ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense net of interest income</td><td>$ 95</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 99</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>( 14.1 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>business restructuring net</td><td>$ 66</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 191</td><td>n/a</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension settlement charges</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 60</td><td>$ 968</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 93.8 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other charges</td><td>$ 122</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 242</td><td>64.9% ( 64.9 % )</td><td>( 69.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other income</td><td>( $ 114 )</td><td>( $ 150 )</td><td>( $ 127 )</td><td>( 24.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>18.1% ( 18.1 % )</td></tr></table> interest expense , net of interest income interest expense , net of interest income increased $ 10 million in 2018 versus 2017 primarily due to the issuance of long- term debt in early 2018 . interest expense , net of interest income decreased $ 14 million in 2017 versus 2016 due to lower interest rate debt outstanding in 2017 . business restructuring , net a pretax restructuring charge of $ 83 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2018 , offset by certain changes in estimates to complete previously recorded programs of $ 17 million . a pretax charge of $ 191 million was recorded in 2016 . refer to note 8 , "business restructuring" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . pension settlement charges during 2017 , ppg made lump-sum payments to certain retirees who had participated in ppg's u.s . qualified and non- qualified pension plans totaling approximately $ 127 million . as the lump-sum payments were in excess of the expected 2017 service and interest costs for the affected plans , ppg remeasured the periodic benefit obligation of these plans in the period payments were made and recorded settlement charges totaling $ 60 million ( $ 38 million after-tax ) during 2017 . during 2016 , ppg permanently transferred approximately $ 1.8 billion of its u.s . and canadian pension obligations and assets to several highly rated insurance companies . these actions triggered remeasurement and partial settlement of certain of the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans . ppg recognized a $ 968 million pre-tax settlement charge in connection with these transactions . refer to note 13 , "employee benefit plans" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other charges other charges in 2018 and 2016 were higher than 2017 primarily due to environmental remediation charges . these charges were principally for environmental remediation at a former chromium manufacturing plant and associated sites in new jersey . refer to note 14 , "commitments and contingent liabilities" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other income other income was lower in 2018 and 2016 than in 2017 primarily due to the gain from the sale of the mexican plaka business of $ 25 million and income from a legal settlement of $ 18 million in 2017 . refer to note 3 , "acquisitions and divestitures" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what was the net interest expense in 2019?
Answer: 95.0
Question: what was it in 2018?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what is the difference?
| 10.0 |
CONVFINQA6178 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
30 2018 ppg annual report and 10-k foreign currency translation partially offset by : cost reclassifications associated with the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard . refer to note 2 , "revenue recognition" within part 2 of this form 10-k cost management including restructuring cost savings 2017 vs . 2016 selling , general and administrative expenses decreased $ 1 million primarily due to : lower net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs lower selling and advertising costs restructuring cost savings partially offset by : wage and other cost inflation selling , general and administrative expenses from acquired businesses foreign currency translation other charges and other income . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except percentages )</td><td>2018</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2016</td><td>% ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense net of interest income</td><td>$ 95</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 99</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>( 14.1 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>business restructuring net</td><td>$ 66</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 191</td><td>n/a</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension settlement charges</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 60</td><td>$ 968</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 93.8 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other charges</td><td>$ 122</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 242</td><td>64.9% ( 64.9 % )</td><td>( 69.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other income</td><td>( $ 114 )</td><td>( $ 150 )</td><td>( $ 127 )</td><td>( 24.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>18.1% ( 18.1 % )</td></tr></table> interest expense , net of interest income interest expense , net of interest income increased $ 10 million in 2018 versus 2017 primarily due to the issuance of long- term debt in early 2018 . interest expense , net of interest income decreased $ 14 million in 2017 versus 2016 due to lower interest rate debt outstanding in 2017 . business restructuring , net a pretax restructuring charge of $ 83 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2018 , offset by certain changes in estimates to complete previously recorded programs of $ 17 million . a pretax charge of $ 191 million was recorded in 2016 . refer to note 8 , "business restructuring" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . pension settlement charges during 2017 , ppg made lump-sum payments to certain retirees who had participated in ppg's u.s . qualified and non- qualified pension plans totaling approximately $ 127 million . as the lump-sum payments were in excess of the expected 2017 service and interest costs for the affected plans , ppg remeasured the periodic benefit obligation of these plans in the period payments were made and recorded settlement charges totaling $ 60 million ( $ 38 million after-tax ) during 2017 . during 2016 , ppg permanently transferred approximately $ 1.8 billion of its u.s . and canadian pension obligations and assets to several highly rated insurance companies . these actions triggered remeasurement and partial settlement of certain of the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans . ppg recognized a $ 968 million pre-tax settlement charge in connection with these transactions . refer to note 13 , "employee benefit plans" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other charges other charges in 2018 and 2016 were higher than 2017 primarily due to environmental remediation charges . these charges were principally for environmental remediation at a former chromium manufacturing plant and associated sites in new jersey . refer to note 14 , "commitments and contingent liabilities" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other income other income was lower in 2018 and 2016 than in 2017 primarily due to the gain from the sale of the mexican plaka business of $ 25 million and income from a legal settlement of $ 18 million in 2017 . refer to note 3 , "acquisitions and divestitures" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what was the net interest expense in 2019?
Answer: 95.0
Question: what was it in 2018?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what is the difference added to the 2019 value?
| 105.0 |
CONVFINQA6179 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>38</td><td>43</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recoveries of amounts written off</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ -39 ( 39 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: in 2013, as part of the company's noncollectable amounts, how much did those amounts written off represent in relation to the recovered ones?
| 6.14286 |
CONVFINQA6180 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>38</td><td>43</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recoveries of amounts written off</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ -39 ( 39 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: in 2013, as part of the company's noncollectable amounts, how much did those amounts written off represent in relation to the recovered ones?
Answer: 6.14286
Question: and from that year to 2015, what was the increase in the property, plant and equipment depreciation expense?
| 31.0 |
CONVFINQA6181 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>38</td><td>43</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recoveries of amounts written off</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ -39 ( 39 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: in 2013, as part of the company's noncollectable amounts, how much did those amounts written off represent in relation to the recovered ones?
Answer: 6.14286
Question: and from that year to 2015, what was the increase in the property, plant and equipment depreciation expense?
Answer: 31.0
Question: what is this increase as a portion of that depreciation expense in 2013?
| 0.08289 |
CONVFINQA6182 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .
Question: what was the difference in the total reorganization items net between 2012 and 2013?
| 461.0 |
CONVFINQA6183 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .
Question: what was the difference in the total reorganization items net between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 461.0
Question: so what was the percentage growth during this time?
| 0.21156 |
CONVFINQA6184 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?
| 218602.0 |
CONVFINQA6185 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: what is the balance of the performance shares outstanding in the beginning of 2011?
| 556186.0 |
CONVFINQA6186 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: what is the balance of the performance shares outstanding in the beginning of 2011?
Answer: 556186.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.39304 |
CONVFINQA6187 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: what is the balance of the performance shares outstanding in the beginning of 2011?
Answer: 556186.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.39304
Question: what is the fair value of the performance share units at july 1 , 2011?
| 8.6 |
CONVFINQA6188 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: what is the balance of the performance shares outstanding in the beginning of 2011?
Answer: 556186.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.39304
Question: what is the fair value of the performance share units at july 1 , 2011?
Answer: 8.6
Question: what amount relate to post-merger services?
| 7.3 |
CONVFINQA6189 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: what is the balance of the performance shares outstanding in the beginning of 2011?
Answer: 556186.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.39304
Question: what is the fair value of the performance share units at july 1 , 2011?
Answer: 8.6
Question: what amount relate to post-merger services?
Answer: 7.3
Question: what about the amount that does not relate to post-merger services?
| 1.3 |
CONVFINQA6190 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?
Answer: 218602.0
Question: what is the balance of the performance shares outstanding in the beginning of 2011?
Answer: 556186.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.39304
Question: what is the fair value of the performance share units at july 1 , 2011?
Answer: 8.6
Question: what amount relate to post-merger services?
Answer: 7.3
Question: what about the amount that does not relate to post-merger services?
Answer: 1.3
Question: what proportion is not related to post-merger services?
| 0.15116 |
CONVFINQA6191 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate/other corporate/other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions ( including finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) , other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses and income taxes , as well as corporate treasury , certain north america legacy consumer loan portfolios , other legacy assets and discontinued operations ( for additional information on corporate/other , see 201ccitigroup segments 201d above ) . at december 31 , 2018 , corporate/other had $ 91 billion in assets , an increase of 17% ( 17 % ) from the prior year . in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 % ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017 % ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>% ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ 2254</td><td>$ 2000</td><td>$ 3045</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>( 34 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-171 ( 171 )</td><td>1132</td><td>2188</td><td>nm</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ 2083</td><td>$ 3132</td><td>$ 5233</td><td>( 33 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2272</td><td>$ 3814</td><td>$ 5042</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net credit losses</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 435</td><td>( 86 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 66 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit reserve build ( release )</td><td>-218 ( 218 )</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td><td>-456 ( 456 )</td><td>31</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision ( release ) for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>2014</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>provision for benefits and claims</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>98</td><td>71</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>$ -202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ -175 ( 175 )</td><td>$ 69</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ -507 ( 507 )</td><td>$ 122</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-113 ( 113 )</td><td>19064</td><td>-455 ( 455 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ -19571 ( 19571 )</td><td>$ 577</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-111 ( 111 )</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td><td>93</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ -19682 ( 19682 )</td><td>$ 519</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>11</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ -19676 ( 19676 )</td><td>$ 521</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> nm not meaningful 2018 vs . 2017 net income was $ 107 million in 2018 , compared to a net loss of $ 19.7 billion in the prior year , primarily driven by the $ 19.8 billion one-time , non-cash charge recorded in the tax line in 2017 due to the impact of tax reform . results in 2018 included the one-time benefit of $ 94 million in the tax line , related to tax reform . for additional information , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 2014income taxes 201d below . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform in 2018 and 2017 , net income decreased 92% ( 92 % ) , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses , lower cost of credit and tax benefits related to the reorganization of certain non-u.s . subsidiaries . the tax benefits were largely offset by the release of a foreign currency translation adjustment ( cta ) from aoci to earnings ( for additional information on the cta release , see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements ) . revenues decreased 33% ( 33 % ) , driven by the continued wind-down of legacy assets . expenses decreased 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets , lower infrastructure costs and lower legal expenses . provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 86% ( 86 % ) to $ 21 million , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the net reserve release declined by $ 96 million to $ 221 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures . 2017 vs . 2016 the net loss was $ 19.7 billion , compared to net income of $ 521 million in the prior year , primarily driven by the one-time impact of tax reform . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform , net income declined 69% ( 69 % ) to $ 168 million , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit . revenues declined 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy assets and the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in 2016 . revenues included approximately $ 750 million in gains on asset sales in the first quarter of 2017 , which more than offset a roughly $ 300 million charge related to the exit of citi 2019s u.s . mortgage servicing operations in the quarter . expenses declined 24% ( 24 % ) , reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets and lower legal expenses , partially offset by approximately $ 100 million in episodic expenses primarily related to the exit of the u.s . mortgage servicing operations . also included in expenses is an approximately $ 255 million provision for remediation costs related to a card act matter in 2017 . provisions decreased $ 244 million to a net benefit of $ 175 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses and a lower provision for benefits and claims , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 66% ( 66 % ) , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the decline in the provision for benefits and claims was primarily due to lower insurance activity . the net reserve release declined $ 147 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures. .
Question: what was the net difference in total revenues net of interest expense from 2016 to 2018?
| -3150.0 |
CONVFINQA6192 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate/other corporate/other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions ( including finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) , other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses and income taxes , as well as corporate treasury , certain north america legacy consumer loan portfolios , other legacy assets and discontinued operations ( for additional information on corporate/other , see 201ccitigroup segments 201d above ) . at december 31 , 2018 , corporate/other had $ 91 billion in assets , an increase of 17% ( 17 % ) from the prior year . in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 % ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017 % ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>% ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ 2254</td><td>$ 2000</td><td>$ 3045</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>( 34 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-171 ( 171 )</td><td>1132</td><td>2188</td><td>nm</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ 2083</td><td>$ 3132</td><td>$ 5233</td><td>( 33 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2272</td><td>$ 3814</td><td>$ 5042</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net credit losses</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 435</td><td>( 86 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 66 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit reserve build ( release )</td><td>-218 ( 218 )</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td><td>-456 ( 456 )</td><td>31</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision ( release ) for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>2014</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>provision for benefits and claims</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>98</td><td>71</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>$ -202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ -175 ( 175 )</td><td>$ 69</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ -507 ( 507 )</td><td>$ 122</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-113 ( 113 )</td><td>19064</td><td>-455 ( 455 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ -19571 ( 19571 )</td><td>$ 577</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-111 ( 111 )</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td><td>93</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ -19682 ( 19682 )</td><td>$ 519</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>11</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ -19676 ( 19676 )</td><td>$ 521</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> nm not meaningful 2018 vs . 2017 net income was $ 107 million in 2018 , compared to a net loss of $ 19.7 billion in the prior year , primarily driven by the $ 19.8 billion one-time , non-cash charge recorded in the tax line in 2017 due to the impact of tax reform . results in 2018 included the one-time benefit of $ 94 million in the tax line , related to tax reform . for additional information , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 2014income taxes 201d below . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform in 2018 and 2017 , net income decreased 92% ( 92 % ) , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses , lower cost of credit and tax benefits related to the reorganization of certain non-u.s . subsidiaries . the tax benefits were largely offset by the release of a foreign currency translation adjustment ( cta ) from aoci to earnings ( for additional information on the cta release , see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements ) . revenues decreased 33% ( 33 % ) , driven by the continued wind-down of legacy assets . expenses decreased 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets , lower infrastructure costs and lower legal expenses . provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 86% ( 86 % ) to $ 21 million , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the net reserve release declined by $ 96 million to $ 221 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures . 2017 vs . 2016 the net loss was $ 19.7 billion , compared to net income of $ 521 million in the prior year , primarily driven by the one-time impact of tax reform . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform , net income declined 69% ( 69 % ) to $ 168 million , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit . revenues declined 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy assets and the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in 2016 . revenues included approximately $ 750 million in gains on asset sales in the first quarter of 2017 , which more than offset a roughly $ 300 million charge related to the exit of citi 2019s u.s . mortgage servicing operations in the quarter . expenses declined 24% ( 24 % ) , reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets and lower legal expenses , partially offset by approximately $ 100 million in episodic expenses primarily related to the exit of the u.s . mortgage servicing operations . also included in expenses is an approximately $ 255 million provision for remediation costs related to a card act matter in 2017 . provisions decreased $ 244 million to a net benefit of $ 175 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses and a lower provision for benefits and claims , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 66% ( 66 % ) , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the decline in the provision for benefits and claims was primarily due to lower insurance activity . the net reserve release declined $ 147 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures. .
Question: what was the net difference in total revenues net of interest expense from 2016 to 2018?
Answer: -3150.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
| 5233.0 |
CONVFINQA6193 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate/other corporate/other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions ( including finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) , other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses and income taxes , as well as corporate treasury , certain north america legacy consumer loan portfolios , other legacy assets and discontinued operations ( for additional information on corporate/other , see 201ccitigroup segments 201d above ) . at december 31 , 2018 , corporate/other had $ 91 billion in assets , an increase of 17% ( 17 % ) from the prior year . in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 % ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017 % ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>% ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ 2254</td><td>$ 2000</td><td>$ 3045</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>( 34 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-171 ( 171 )</td><td>1132</td><td>2188</td><td>nm</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ 2083</td><td>$ 3132</td><td>$ 5233</td><td>( 33 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2272</td><td>$ 3814</td><td>$ 5042</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net credit losses</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 435</td><td>( 86 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 66 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit reserve build ( release )</td><td>-218 ( 218 )</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td><td>-456 ( 456 )</td><td>31</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision ( release ) for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>2014</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>provision for benefits and claims</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>98</td><td>71</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>$ -202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ -175 ( 175 )</td><td>$ 69</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ -507 ( 507 )</td><td>$ 122</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-113 ( 113 )</td><td>19064</td><td>-455 ( 455 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ -19571 ( 19571 )</td><td>$ 577</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-111 ( 111 )</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td><td>93</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ -19682 ( 19682 )</td><td>$ 519</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>11</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ -19676 ( 19676 )</td><td>$ 521</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> nm not meaningful 2018 vs . 2017 net income was $ 107 million in 2018 , compared to a net loss of $ 19.7 billion in the prior year , primarily driven by the $ 19.8 billion one-time , non-cash charge recorded in the tax line in 2017 due to the impact of tax reform . results in 2018 included the one-time benefit of $ 94 million in the tax line , related to tax reform . for additional information , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 2014income taxes 201d below . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform in 2018 and 2017 , net income decreased 92% ( 92 % ) , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses , lower cost of credit and tax benefits related to the reorganization of certain non-u.s . subsidiaries . the tax benefits were largely offset by the release of a foreign currency translation adjustment ( cta ) from aoci to earnings ( for additional information on the cta release , see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements ) . revenues decreased 33% ( 33 % ) , driven by the continued wind-down of legacy assets . expenses decreased 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets , lower infrastructure costs and lower legal expenses . provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 86% ( 86 % ) to $ 21 million , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the net reserve release declined by $ 96 million to $ 221 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures . 2017 vs . 2016 the net loss was $ 19.7 billion , compared to net income of $ 521 million in the prior year , primarily driven by the one-time impact of tax reform . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform , net income declined 69% ( 69 % ) to $ 168 million , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit . revenues declined 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy assets and the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in 2016 . revenues included approximately $ 750 million in gains on asset sales in the first quarter of 2017 , which more than offset a roughly $ 300 million charge related to the exit of citi 2019s u.s . mortgage servicing operations in the quarter . expenses declined 24% ( 24 % ) , reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets and lower legal expenses , partially offset by approximately $ 100 million in episodic expenses primarily related to the exit of the u.s . mortgage servicing operations . also included in expenses is an approximately $ 255 million provision for remediation costs related to a card act matter in 2017 . provisions decreased $ 244 million to a net benefit of $ 175 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses and a lower provision for benefits and claims , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 66% ( 66 % ) , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the decline in the provision for benefits and claims was primarily due to lower insurance activity . the net reserve release declined $ 147 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures. .
Question: what was the net difference in total revenues net of interest expense from 2016 to 2018?
Answer: -3150.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
Answer: 5233.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.60195 |
CONVFINQA6194 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>$ 84313</td><td>$ 90643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments</td><td>63526</td><td>76589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>security and other deposits</td><td>11692</td><td>16087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid royalties</td><td>12059</td><td>9026</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>9045</td><td>7560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>restricted cash</td><td>4650</td><td>7361</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>prepaid land lease</td><td>3209</td><td>3185</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>prepaid rent</td><td>1377</td><td>2658</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>1394</td><td>3420</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other assets</td><td>$ 191265</td><td>$ 216529</td></tr></table> acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. .
Question: what was the difference is other assets from 2008 to 2009?
| -25264.0 |
CONVFINQA6195 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>$ 84313</td><td>$ 90643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments</td><td>63526</td><td>76589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>security and other deposits</td><td>11692</td><td>16087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid royalties</td><td>12059</td><td>9026</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>9045</td><td>7560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>restricted cash</td><td>4650</td><td>7361</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>prepaid land lease</td><td>3209</td><td>3185</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>prepaid rent</td><td>1377</td><td>2658</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>1394</td><td>3420</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other assets</td><td>$ 191265</td><td>$ 216529</td></tr></table> acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. .
Question: what was the difference is other assets from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: -25264.0
Question: what was the value of other assets in 2008?
| 216529.0 |
CONVFINQA6196 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>$ 84313</td><td>$ 90643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments</td><td>63526</td><td>76589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>security and other deposits</td><td>11692</td><td>16087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid royalties</td><td>12059</td><td>9026</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>9045</td><td>7560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>restricted cash</td><td>4650</td><td>7361</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>prepaid land lease</td><td>3209</td><td>3185</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>prepaid rent</td><td>1377</td><td>2658</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>1394</td><td>3420</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other assets</td><td>$ 191265</td><td>$ 216529</td></tr></table> acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. .
Question: what was the difference is other assets from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: -25264.0
Question: what was the value of other assets in 2008?
Answer: 216529.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.11668 |
CONVFINQA6197 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2015 and 2014. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2015</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 101.88</td><td>$ 93.21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>98.64</td><td>91.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>101.54</td><td>86.83</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>104.12</td><td>87.23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 84.90</td><td>$ 78.38</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>90.73</td><td>80.10</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>99.90</td><td>89.05</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>106.31</td><td>90.20</td></tr></table> on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 19 , 2016 , we had 423897556 outstanding shares of common stock and 159 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , issued in may 2014 ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 2.3 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2016 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we declared the following cash distributions: .
Question: what is the difference between high and low share price for the quarter ending on march 31?
| 8.67 |
CONVFINQA6198 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2015 and 2014. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2015</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 101.88</td><td>$ 93.21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>98.64</td><td>91.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>101.54</td><td>86.83</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>104.12</td><td>87.23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 84.90</td><td>$ 78.38</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>90.73</td><td>80.10</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>99.90</td><td>89.05</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>106.31</td><td>90.20</td></tr></table> on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 19 , 2016 , we had 423897556 outstanding shares of common stock and 159 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , issued in may 2014 ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 2.3 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2016 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we declared the following cash distributions: .
Question: what is the difference between high and low share price for the quarter ending on march 31?
Answer: 8.67
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.09302 |
CONVFINQA6199 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1233672</td><td>$ 75.93</td><td>4903018</td></tr></table> part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what is the number securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
| 1233672.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.