id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA6200 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1233672</td><td>$ 75.93</td><td>4903018</td></tr></table> part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what is the number securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 1233672.0
Question: what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
| 4903018.0 |
CONVFINQA6201 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1233672</td><td>$ 75.93</td><td>4903018</td></tr></table> part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what is the number securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 1233672.0
Question: what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 4903018.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 6136690.0 |
CONVFINQA6202 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1233672</td><td>$ 75.93</td><td>4903018</td></tr></table> part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i of this report on pages 11 - 12 . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201cexecutive compensation , 201d 201ccompensation committee report on executive compensation 201d and 201ccompensation committee interlocks and insider participation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2014 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1233672 $ 75.93 4903018 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201cpolicy on audit committee pre- approval of audit and non-audit services of independent registered public accounting firm 201d in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what is the number securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 1233672.0
Question: what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 4903018.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 6136690.0
Question: what is the number of securities remaining divided by the sum of securities to be issued?
| 0.79897 |
CONVFINQA6203 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .
Question: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?
| 166137.0 |
CONVFINQA6204 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .
Question: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?
Answer: 166137.0
Question: and what was it for 2016?
| 51232.0 |
CONVFINQA6205 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .
Question: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?
Answer: 166137.0
Question: and what was it for 2016?
Answer: 51232.0
Question: what was, then, the total of payables for both years?
| 217369.0 |
CONVFINQA6206 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .
Question: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?
Answer: 166137.0
Question: and what was it for 2016?
Answer: 51232.0
Question: what was, then, the total of payables for both years?
Answer: 217369.0
Question: including 2015, what becomes this total?
| 270111.0 |
CONVFINQA6207 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 166137 )</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2018 . a0 a0the $ 150 million credit facility permits the issuance of letters of credit against $ 5 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . a0 a0as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 50 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 24.9 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc , and the current authorization extends through december 2018 . entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery retail rates 2015 base rate filing in april 2015 , entergy arkansas filed with the apsc for a general change in rates , charges , and tariffs . the filing notified the apsc of entergy arkansas 2019s intent to implement a forward test year formula rate plan pursuant to arkansas legislation passed in 2015 , and requested a retail rate increase of $ 268.4 million , with a net increase in revenue of $ 167 million . the filing requested a 10.2% ( 10.2 % ) return on common equity . in september 2015 the apsc staff and intervenors filed direct testimony , with the apsc staff recommending a revenue requirement of $ 217.9 million and a 9.65% ( 9.65 % ) return on common equity . in december 2015 , entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and certain of the intervenors in the rate case filed with the apsc a joint motion for approval of a settlement of the case that proposed a retail rate increase of approximately $ 225 million with a net increase in revenue of approximately $ 133 million ; an authorized return on common equity of 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) ; and a formula rate plan tariff that provides a +/- 50 basis point band around the 9.75% ( 9.75 % ) allowed return on common equity . a significant portion of the rate increase is related to entergy arkansas 2019s acquisition in march 2016 of union power station power block 2 for a base purchase price of $ 237 million . the settlement agreement also provided for amortization over a 10-year period of $ 7.7 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano post-fukushima compliance and $ 9.9 million of previously-incurred costs related to ano flood barrier compliance . a settlement hearing was held in january 2016 . in february 2016 the apsc approved the settlement with one exception that reduced the retail rate increase proposed in the settlement by $ 5 million . the settling parties agreed to the apsc modifications in february 2016 . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . in march 2016 , entergy arkansas made a compliance filing regarding the .
Question: what was the total of the entergy arkansas 2019s payables in 2017, in millions?
Answer: 166137.0
Question: and what was it for 2016?
Answer: 51232.0
Question: what was, then, the total of payables for both years?
Answer: 217369.0
Question: including 2015, what becomes this total?
Answer: 270111.0
Question: and as of the last year of this period, what percentage of the aggregate borrowing capacity was set to expire in 2019?
| 0.32 |
CONVFINQA6208 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
korea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the amount in received cash dividends in the year of 2011?
| 78.0 |
CONVFINQA6209 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
korea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the amount in received cash dividends in the year of 2011?
Answer: 78.0
Question: and what was that of 2010?
| 71.0 |
CONVFINQA6210 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
korea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the amount in received cash dividends in the year of 2011?
Answer: 78.0
Question: and what was that of 2010?
Answer: 71.0
Question: what was the change in value over the year?
| 7.0 |
CONVFINQA6211 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
korea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the amount in received cash dividends in the year of 2011?
Answer: 78.0
Question: and what was that of 2010?
Answer: 71.0
Question: what was the change in value over the year?
Answer: 7.0
Question: what was the amount in received cash dividends in the year of 2010?
| 71.0 |
CONVFINQA6212 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
korea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the amount in received cash dividends in the year of 2011?
Answer: 78.0
Question: and what was that of 2010?
Answer: 71.0
Question: what was the change in value over the year?
Answer: 7.0
Question: what was the amount in received cash dividends in the year of 2010?
Answer: 71.0
Question: how much does that change represent in relation to the this amount?
| 0.09859 |
CONVFINQA6213 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 215</td><td>$ 283</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 269</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>144</td><td>158</td><td>197</td><td>206</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 187</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in s&p500 from 2016 to 2017?
| 30.0 |
CONVFINQA6214 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 215</td><td>$ 283</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 269</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>144</td><td>158</td><td>197</td><td>206</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 187</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in s&p500 from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 30.0
Question: what is the value of the investment in s&p500 at the end of 2017?
| 157.0 |
CONVFINQA6215 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 215</td><td>$ 283</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 269</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>144</td><td>158</td><td>197</td><td>206</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 187</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in s&p500 from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 30.0
Question: what is the value of the investment in s&p500 at the end of 2017?
Answer: 157.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.19108 |
CONVFINQA6216 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment of long-lived assets , goodwill and intangible assets - we assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on statement 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d a long-lived asset is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value . fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets . we assess our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually based on statement 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d there were no impairment charges resulting from the july 1 , 2007 , impairment tests and no events indicating an impairment have occurred subsequent to that date . an initial assessment is made by comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill , as determined in accordance with statement 142 , to the book value of each reporting unit . if the fair value is less than the book value , an impairment is indicated , and we must perform a second test to measure the amount of the impairment . in the second test , we calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step one of the assessment . if the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill , we will record an impairment charge . at december 31 , 2007 , we had $ 600.7 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as shown below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oneok partners</td><td>$ 431418</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distribution</td><td>157953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>10255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1099</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total goodwill</td><td>$ 600725</td></tr></table> ( thousands of dollars ) intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life , while intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized . all intangible assets are subject to impairment testing . our oneok partners segment had $ 443.0 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 , of which $ 287.5 million is being amortized over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years , while the remaining balance has an indefinite life . during 2006 , we recorded a goodwill and asset impairment related to oneok partners 2019 black mesa pipeline of $ 8.4 million and $ 3.6 million , respectively , which were recorded as depreciation and amortization . the reduction to our net income , net of minority interests and income taxes , was $ 3.0 million . in the third quarter of 2005 , we made the decision to sell our spring creek power plant , located in oklahoma , and exit the power generation business . in october 2005 , we concluded that our spring creek power plant had been impaired and recorded an impairment expense of $ 52.2 million . this conclusion was based on our statement 144 impairment analysis of the results of operations for this plant through september 30 , 2005 , and also the net sales proceeds from the anticipated sale of the plant . the sale was completed on october 31 , 2006 . this component of our business is accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with statement 144 . see 201cdiscontinued operations 201d on page 46 for additional information . our total unamortized excess cost over underlying fair value of net assets accounted for under the equity method was $ 185.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 . based on statement 142 , this amount , referred to as equity method goodwill , should continue to be recognized in accordance with apb opinion no . 18 , 201cthe equity method of accounting for investments in common stock . 201d accordingly , we included this amount in investment in unconsolidated affiliates on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets . pension and postretirement employee benefits - we have defined benefit retirement plans covering certain full-time employees . we sponsor welfare plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees who retire with at least five years of service . our actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events . these factors include assumptions about the discount rate , expected return on plan assets , rate of future compensation increases , age and employment periods . in determining the projected benefit obligations and costs , assumptions can change from period to period and result in material changes in the costs and liabilities we recognize . see note j of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what is the goodwill value from oneok partners?
| 431418.0 |
CONVFINQA6217 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment of long-lived assets , goodwill and intangible assets - we assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on statement 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d a long-lived asset is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value . fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets . we assess our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually based on statement 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d there were no impairment charges resulting from the july 1 , 2007 , impairment tests and no events indicating an impairment have occurred subsequent to that date . an initial assessment is made by comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill , as determined in accordance with statement 142 , to the book value of each reporting unit . if the fair value is less than the book value , an impairment is indicated , and we must perform a second test to measure the amount of the impairment . in the second test , we calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step one of the assessment . if the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill , we will record an impairment charge . at december 31 , 2007 , we had $ 600.7 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as shown below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oneok partners</td><td>$ 431418</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distribution</td><td>157953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>10255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1099</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total goodwill</td><td>$ 600725</td></tr></table> ( thousands of dollars ) intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life , while intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized . all intangible assets are subject to impairment testing . our oneok partners segment had $ 443.0 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 , of which $ 287.5 million is being amortized over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years , while the remaining balance has an indefinite life . during 2006 , we recorded a goodwill and asset impairment related to oneok partners 2019 black mesa pipeline of $ 8.4 million and $ 3.6 million , respectively , which were recorded as depreciation and amortization . the reduction to our net income , net of minority interests and income taxes , was $ 3.0 million . in the third quarter of 2005 , we made the decision to sell our spring creek power plant , located in oklahoma , and exit the power generation business . in october 2005 , we concluded that our spring creek power plant had been impaired and recorded an impairment expense of $ 52.2 million . this conclusion was based on our statement 144 impairment analysis of the results of operations for this plant through september 30 , 2005 , and also the net sales proceeds from the anticipated sale of the plant . the sale was completed on october 31 , 2006 . this component of our business is accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with statement 144 . see 201cdiscontinued operations 201d on page 46 for additional information . our total unamortized excess cost over underlying fair value of net assets accounted for under the equity method was $ 185.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 . based on statement 142 , this amount , referred to as equity method goodwill , should continue to be recognized in accordance with apb opinion no . 18 , 201cthe equity method of accounting for investments in common stock . 201d accordingly , we included this amount in investment in unconsolidated affiliates on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets . pension and postretirement employee benefits - we have defined benefit retirement plans covering certain full-time employees . we sponsor welfare plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees who retire with at least five years of service . our actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events . these factors include assumptions about the discount rate , expected return on plan assets , rate of future compensation increases , age and employment periods . in determining the projected benefit obligations and costs , assumptions can change from period to period and result in material changes in the costs and liabilities we recognize . see note j of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what is the goodwill value from oneok partners?
Answer: 431418.0
Question: what about the total goodwill?
| 600725.0 |
CONVFINQA6218 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment of long-lived assets , goodwill and intangible assets - we assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on statement 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d a long-lived asset is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value . fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets . we assess our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually based on statement 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d there were no impairment charges resulting from the july 1 , 2007 , impairment tests and no events indicating an impairment have occurred subsequent to that date . an initial assessment is made by comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill , as determined in accordance with statement 142 , to the book value of each reporting unit . if the fair value is less than the book value , an impairment is indicated , and we must perform a second test to measure the amount of the impairment . in the second test , we calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step one of the assessment . if the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill , we will record an impairment charge . at december 31 , 2007 , we had $ 600.7 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as shown below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oneok partners</td><td>$ 431418</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distribution</td><td>157953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>10255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1099</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total goodwill</td><td>$ 600725</td></tr></table> ( thousands of dollars ) intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life , while intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized . all intangible assets are subject to impairment testing . our oneok partners segment had $ 443.0 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 , of which $ 287.5 million is being amortized over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years , while the remaining balance has an indefinite life . during 2006 , we recorded a goodwill and asset impairment related to oneok partners 2019 black mesa pipeline of $ 8.4 million and $ 3.6 million , respectively , which were recorded as depreciation and amortization . the reduction to our net income , net of minority interests and income taxes , was $ 3.0 million . in the third quarter of 2005 , we made the decision to sell our spring creek power plant , located in oklahoma , and exit the power generation business . in october 2005 , we concluded that our spring creek power plant had been impaired and recorded an impairment expense of $ 52.2 million . this conclusion was based on our statement 144 impairment analysis of the results of operations for this plant through september 30 , 2005 , and also the net sales proceeds from the anticipated sale of the plant . the sale was completed on october 31 , 2006 . this component of our business is accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with statement 144 . see 201cdiscontinued operations 201d on page 46 for additional information . our total unamortized excess cost over underlying fair value of net assets accounted for under the equity method was $ 185.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 . based on statement 142 , this amount , referred to as equity method goodwill , should continue to be recognized in accordance with apb opinion no . 18 , 201cthe equity method of accounting for investments in common stock . 201d accordingly , we included this amount in investment in unconsolidated affiliates on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets . pension and postretirement employee benefits - we have defined benefit retirement plans covering certain full-time employees . we sponsor welfare plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees who retire with at least five years of service . our actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events . these factors include assumptions about the discount rate , expected return on plan assets , rate of future compensation increases , age and employment periods . in determining the projected benefit obligations and costs , assumptions can change from period to period and result in material changes in the costs and liabilities we recognize . see note j of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what is the goodwill value from oneok partners?
Answer: 431418.0
Question: what about the total goodwill?
Answer: 600725.0
Question: what proportion of total goodwill is related to oneok partners?
| 0.71816 |
CONVFINQA6219 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment of long-lived assets , goodwill and intangible assets - we assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on statement 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d a long-lived asset is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value . fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets . we assess our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually based on statement 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d there were no impairment charges resulting from the july 1 , 2007 , impairment tests and no events indicating an impairment have occurred subsequent to that date . an initial assessment is made by comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill , as determined in accordance with statement 142 , to the book value of each reporting unit . if the fair value is less than the book value , an impairment is indicated , and we must perform a second test to measure the amount of the impairment . in the second test , we calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step one of the assessment . if the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill , we will record an impairment charge . at december 31 , 2007 , we had $ 600.7 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as shown below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oneok partners</td><td>$ 431418</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distribution</td><td>157953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>10255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1099</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total goodwill</td><td>$ 600725</td></tr></table> ( thousands of dollars ) intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life , while intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized . all intangible assets are subject to impairment testing . our oneok partners segment had $ 443.0 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 , of which $ 287.5 million is being amortized over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years , while the remaining balance has an indefinite life . during 2006 , we recorded a goodwill and asset impairment related to oneok partners 2019 black mesa pipeline of $ 8.4 million and $ 3.6 million , respectively , which were recorded as depreciation and amortization . the reduction to our net income , net of minority interests and income taxes , was $ 3.0 million . in the third quarter of 2005 , we made the decision to sell our spring creek power plant , located in oklahoma , and exit the power generation business . in october 2005 , we concluded that our spring creek power plant had been impaired and recorded an impairment expense of $ 52.2 million . this conclusion was based on our statement 144 impairment analysis of the results of operations for this plant through september 30 , 2005 , and also the net sales proceeds from the anticipated sale of the plant . the sale was completed on october 31 , 2006 . this component of our business is accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with statement 144 . see 201cdiscontinued operations 201d on page 46 for additional information . our total unamortized excess cost over underlying fair value of net assets accounted for under the equity method was $ 185.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 . based on statement 142 , this amount , referred to as equity method goodwill , should continue to be recognized in accordance with apb opinion no . 18 , 201cthe equity method of accounting for investments in common stock . 201d accordingly , we included this amount in investment in unconsolidated affiliates on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets . pension and postretirement employee benefits - we have defined benefit retirement plans covering certain full-time employees . we sponsor welfare plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees who retire with at least five years of service . our actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events . these factors include assumptions about the discount rate , expected return on plan assets , rate of future compensation increases , age and employment periods . in determining the projected benefit obligations and costs , assumptions can change from period to period and result in material changes in the costs and liabilities we recognize . see note j of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what is the goodwill value from oneok partners?
Answer: 431418.0
Question: what about the total goodwill?
Answer: 600725.0
Question: what proportion of total goodwill is related to oneok partners?
Answer: 0.71816
Question: what about the goodwill value from energy services?
| 10255.0 |
CONVFINQA6220 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment of long-lived assets , goodwill and intangible assets - we assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on statement 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d a long-lived asset is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value . fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets . we assess our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually based on statement 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d there were no impairment charges resulting from the july 1 , 2007 , impairment tests and no events indicating an impairment have occurred subsequent to that date . an initial assessment is made by comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill , as determined in accordance with statement 142 , to the book value of each reporting unit . if the fair value is less than the book value , an impairment is indicated , and we must perform a second test to measure the amount of the impairment . in the second test , we calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step one of the assessment . if the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill , we will record an impairment charge . at december 31 , 2007 , we had $ 600.7 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as shown below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oneok partners</td><td>$ 431418</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distribution</td><td>157953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>10255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1099</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total goodwill</td><td>$ 600725</td></tr></table> ( thousands of dollars ) intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life , while intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized . all intangible assets are subject to impairment testing . our oneok partners segment had $ 443.0 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 , of which $ 287.5 million is being amortized over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years , while the remaining balance has an indefinite life . during 2006 , we recorded a goodwill and asset impairment related to oneok partners 2019 black mesa pipeline of $ 8.4 million and $ 3.6 million , respectively , which were recorded as depreciation and amortization . the reduction to our net income , net of minority interests and income taxes , was $ 3.0 million . in the third quarter of 2005 , we made the decision to sell our spring creek power plant , located in oklahoma , and exit the power generation business . in october 2005 , we concluded that our spring creek power plant had been impaired and recorded an impairment expense of $ 52.2 million . this conclusion was based on our statement 144 impairment analysis of the results of operations for this plant through september 30 , 2005 , and also the net sales proceeds from the anticipated sale of the plant . the sale was completed on october 31 , 2006 . this component of our business is accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with statement 144 . see 201cdiscontinued operations 201d on page 46 for additional information . our total unamortized excess cost over underlying fair value of net assets accounted for under the equity method was $ 185.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 . based on statement 142 , this amount , referred to as equity method goodwill , should continue to be recognized in accordance with apb opinion no . 18 , 201cthe equity method of accounting for investments in common stock . 201d accordingly , we included this amount in investment in unconsolidated affiliates on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets . pension and postretirement employee benefits - we have defined benefit retirement plans covering certain full-time employees . we sponsor welfare plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees who retire with at least five years of service . our actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events . these factors include assumptions about the discount rate , expected return on plan assets , rate of future compensation increases , age and employment periods . in determining the projected benefit obligations and costs , assumptions can change from period to period and result in material changes in the costs and liabilities we recognize . see note j of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: what is the goodwill value from oneok partners?
Answer: 431418.0
Question: what about the total goodwill?
Answer: 600725.0
Question: what proportion of total goodwill is related to oneok partners?
Answer: 0.71816
Question: what about the goodwill value from energy services?
Answer: 10255.0
Question: what portion of total goodwill is related to energy services?
| 0.01707 |
CONVFINQA6221 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors 201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served . our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations , and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m 201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared to 2013 and 2012 include: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from continuing operations</td><td>$ 2.39</td><td>$ 2.07</td><td>$ 2.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -0.04 ( 0.04 )</td><td>$ -0.01 ( 0.01 )</td><td>$ -0.09 ( 0.09 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ 2.35</td><td>$ 2.06</td><td>$ 2.01</td></tr></table> continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer . earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased 10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .
Question: what is the income from continuing operations in 2014?
| 2.39 |
CONVFINQA6222 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors 201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served . our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations , and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m 201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared to 2013 and 2012 include: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from continuing operations</td><td>$ 2.39</td><td>$ 2.07</td><td>$ 2.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -0.04 ( 0.04 )</td><td>$ -0.01 ( 0.01 )</td><td>$ -0.09 ( 0.09 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ 2.35</td><td>$ 2.06</td><td>$ 2.01</td></tr></table> continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer . earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased 10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .
Question: what is the income from continuing operations in 2014?
Answer: 2.39
Question: what about in 2012?
| 2.1 |
CONVFINQA6223 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors 201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served . our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations , and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m 201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared to 2013 and 2012 include: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from continuing operations</td><td>$ 2.39</td><td>$ 2.07</td><td>$ 2.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -0.04 ( 0.04 )</td><td>$ -0.01 ( 0.01 )</td><td>$ -0.09 ( 0.09 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ 2.35</td><td>$ 2.06</td><td>$ 2.01</td></tr></table> continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer . earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased 10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .
Question: what is the income from continuing operations in 2014?
Answer: 2.39
Question: what about in 2012?
Answer: 2.1
Question: what is the increase in income from continuing operations?
| 0.29 |
CONVFINQA6224 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors 201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served . our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations , and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m 201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared to 2013 and 2012 include: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from continuing operations</td><td>$ 2.39</td><td>$ 2.07</td><td>$ 2.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -0.04 ( 0.04 )</td><td>$ -0.01 ( 0.01 )</td><td>$ -0.09 ( 0.09 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ 2.35</td><td>$ 2.06</td><td>$ 2.01</td></tr></table> continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer . earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased 10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .
Question: what is the income from continuing operations in 2014?
Answer: 2.39
Question: what about in 2012?
Answer: 2.1
Question: what is the increase in income from continuing operations?
Answer: 0.29
Question: what is the income from continuing operations in 2012?
| 2.1 |
CONVFINQA6225 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors 201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served . our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations , and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m 201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared to 2013 and 2012 include: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from continuing operations</td><td>$ 2.39</td><td>$ 2.07</td><td>$ 2.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -0.04 ( 0.04 )</td><td>$ -0.01 ( 0.01 )</td><td>$ -0.09 ( 0.09 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ 2.35</td><td>$ 2.06</td><td>$ 2.01</td></tr></table> continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer . earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased 10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .
Question: what is the income from continuing operations in 2014?
Answer: 2.39
Question: what about in 2012?
Answer: 2.1
Question: what is the increase in income from continuing operations?
Answer: 0.29
Question: what is the income from continuing operations in 2012?
Answer: 2.1
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.1381 |
CONVFINQA6226 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2011 is shown in the following table . all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximate square footage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alpharetta georgia</td><td>260000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>arlington virginia</td><td>119000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>jersey city new jersey</td><td>107000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>menlo park california</td><td>91000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>sandy utah</td><td>66000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>new york new york</td><td>39000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>chicago illinois</td><td>25000</td></tr></table> all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 28 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 7000 square feet . we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2012 . item 3 . legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc . ( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara . ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets . following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement . although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief . on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets . although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a verdict in favor of the company denying all claims raised and demands for damages against the company . following the trial court 2019s filing of entry of judgment in favor of the company on september 5 , 2008 , ajaxo filed post-trial motions for vacating this entry of judgment and requesting a new trial . by order dated november 4 , 2008 , the trial court denied these motions . on december 2 , 2008 , ajaxo filed a notice of appeal with the court of appeal of the state of california for the sixth district . oral argument on the appeal was heard on july 15 , 2010 . on august 30 , 2010 , the court of appeal affirmed the trial court 2019s verdict in part and reversed the verdict in part , remanding the case . e*trade petitioned the supreme court of california for review of the court of appeal decision . on december 16 , 2010 , the california supreme court denied the company 2019s petition for review and remanded for further proceedings to the trial court . on september 20 , 2011 , the trial court granted limited discovery at a conference on november 4 , 2011 , and set a motion schedule and trial date . the trial will continue on may 14 , 2012 . the company will continue to defend itself vigorously . on october 2 , 2007 , a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed in the united states district court for the southern district of new york against the company and its then .
Question: what is the portion of not leased in alpharetta , georgia?
| 0.63462 |
CONVFINQA6227 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2011 is shown in the following table . all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximate square footage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alpharetta georgia</td><td>260000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>arlington virginia</td><td>119000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>jersey city new jersey</td><td>107000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>menlo park california</td><td>91000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>sandy utah</td><td>66000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>new york new york</td><td>39000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>chicago illinois</td><td>25000</td></tr></table> all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 28 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 7000 square feet . we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2012 . item 3 . legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc . ( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara . ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets . following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement . although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief . on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets . although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a verdict in favor of the company denying all claims raised and demands for damages against the company . following the trial court 2019s filing of entry of judgment in favor of the company on september 5 , 2008 , ajaxo filed post-trial motions for vacating this entry of judgment and requesting a new trial . by order dated november 4 , 2008 , the trial court denied these motions . on december 2 , 2008 , ajaxo filed a notice of appeal with the court of appeal of the state of california for the sixth district . oral argument on the appeal was heard on july 15 , 2010 . on august 30 , 2010 , the court of appeal affirmed the trial court 2019s verdict in part and reversed the verdict in part , remanding the case . e*trade petitioned the supreme court of california for review of the court of appeal decision . on december 16 , 2010 , the california supreme court denied the company 2019s petition for review and remanded for further proceedings to the trial court . on september 20 , 2011 , the trial court granted limited discovery at a conference on november 4 , 2011 , and set a motion schedule and trial date . the trial will continue on may 14 , 2012 . the company will continue to defend itself vigorously . on october 2 , 2007 , a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed in the united states district court for the southern district of new york against the company and its then .
Question: what is the portion of not leased in alpharetta , georgia?
Answer: 0.63462
Question: what is the area of the facility in menlo park california?
| 91000.0 |
CONVFINQA6228 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2011 is shown in the following table . all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximate square footage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alpharetta georgia</td><td>260000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>arlington virginia</td><td>119000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>jersey city new jersey</td><td>107000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>menlo park california</td><td>91000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>sandy utah</td><td>66000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>new york new york</td><td>39000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>chicago illinois</td><td>25000</td></tr></table> all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 28 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 7000 square feet . we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2012 . item 3 . legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc . ( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara . ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets . following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement . although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief . on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets . although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a verdict in favor of the company denying all claims raised and demands for damages against the company . following the trial court 2019s filing of entry of judgment in favor of the company on september 5 , 2008 , ajaxo filed post-trial motions for vacating this entry of judgment and requesting a new trial . by order dated november 4 , 2008 , the trial court denied these motions . on december 2 , 2008 , ajaxo filed a notice of appeal with the court of appeal of the state of california for the sixth district . oral argument on the appeal was heard on july 15 , 2010 . on august 30 , 2010 , the court of appeal affirmed the trial court 2019s verdict in part and reversed the verdict in part , remanding the case . e*trade petitioned the supreme court of california for review of the court of appeal decision . on december 16 , 2010 , the california supreme court denied the company 2019s petition for review and remanded for further proceedings to the trial court . on september 20 , 2011 , the trial court granted limited discovery at a conference on november 4 , 2011 , and set a motion schedule and trial date . the trial will continue on may 14 , 2012 . the company will continue to defend itself vigorously . on october 2 , 2007 , a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed in the united states district court for the southern district of new york against the company and its then .
Question: what is the portion of not leased in alpharetta , georgia?
Answer: 0.63462
Question: what is the area of the facility in menlo park california?
Answer: 91000.0
Question: what about in sandy utah?
| 66000.0 |
CONVFINQA6229 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2011 is shown in the following table . all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximate square footage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alpharetta georgia</td><td>260000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>arlington virginia</td><td>119000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>jersey city new jersey</td><td>107000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>menlo park california</td><td>91000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>sandy utah</td><td>66000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>new york new york</td><td>39000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>chicago illinois</td><td>25000</td></tr></table> all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 28 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 7000 square feet . we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2012 . item 3 . legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc . ( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara . ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets . following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement . although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief . on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets . although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a verdict in favor of the company denying all claims raised and demands for damages against the company . following the trial court 2019s filing of entry of judgment in favor of the company on september 5 , 2008 , ajaxo filed post-trial motions for vacating this entry of judgment and requesting a new trial . by order dated november 4 , 2008 , the trial court denied these motions . on december 2 , 2008 , ajaxo filed a notice of appeal with the court of appeal of the state of california for the sixth district . oral argument on the appeal was heard on july 15 , 2010 . on august 30 , 2010 , the court of appeal affirmed the trial court 2019s verdict in part and reversed the verdict in part , remanding the case . e*trade petitioned the supreme court of california for review of the court of appeal decision . on december 16 , 2010 , the california supreme court denied the company 2019s petition for review and remanded for further proceedings to the trial court . on september 20 , 2011 , the trial court granted limited discovery at a conference on november 4 , 2011 , and set a motion schedule and trial date . the trial will continue on may 14 , 2012 . the company will continue to defend itself vigorously . on october 2 , 2007 , a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed in the united states district court for the southern district of new york against the company and its then .
Question: what is the portion of not leased in alpharetta , georgia?
Answer: 0.63462
Question: what is the area of the facility in menlo park california?
Answer: 91000.0
Question: what about in sandy utah?
Answer: 66000.0
Question: what is the ratio of menlo park california space to sandy utah space?
| 1.37879 |
CONVFINQA6230 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 31 , 2010 through october 25 , 2015 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 31 , 2010 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/31/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.54</td><td>90.88</td><td>155.43</td><td>188.13</td><td>150.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>108.09</td><td>124.52</td><td>158.36</td><td>185.71</td><td>195.37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.04</td><td>104.07</td><td>136.15</td><td>172.41</td><td>170.40</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2015 and 2014 , applied's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . dividends paid during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 amounted to $ 487 million , $ 485 million and $ 456 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 104 136 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the value of the s&p 500 index in 2011?
| 108.09 |
CONVFINQA6231 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 31 , 2010 through october 25 , 2015 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 31 , 2010 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/31/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.54</td><td>90.88</td><td>155.43</td><td>188.13</td><td>150.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>108.09</td><td>124.52</td><td>158.36</td><td>185.71</td><td>195.37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.04</td><td>104.07</td><td>136.15</td><td>172.41</td><td>170.40</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2015 and 2014 , applied's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . dividends paid during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 amounted to $ 487 million , $ 485 million and $ 456 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 104 136 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the value of the s&p 500 index in 2011?
Answer: 108.09
Question: what was the initial investment?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA6232 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 31 , 2010 through october 25 , 2015 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 31 , 2010 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/31/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.54</td><td>90.88</td><td>155.43</td><td>188.13</td><td>150.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>108.09</td><td>124.52</td><td>158.36</td><td>185.71</td><td>195.37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.04</td><td>104.07</td><td>136.15</td><td>172.41</td><td>170.40</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2015 and 2014 , applied's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . dividends paid during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 amounted to $ 487 million , $ 485 million and $ 456 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 104 136 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the value of the s&p 500 index in 2011?
Answer: 108.09
Question: what was the initial investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| 8.09 |
CONVFINQA6233 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 31 , 2010 through october 25 , 2015 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 31 , 2010 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/31/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.54</td><td>90.88</td><td>155.43</td><td>188.13</td><td>150.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>108.09</td><td>124.52</td><td>158.36</td><td>185.71</td><td>195.37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.04</td><td>104.07</td><td>136.15</td><td>172.41</td><td>170.40</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2015 and 2014 , applied's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . dividends paid during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 amounted to $ 487 million , $ 485 million and $ 456 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 104 136 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the value of the s&p 500 index in 2011?
Answer: 108.09
Question: what was the initial investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 8.09
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.0809 |
CONVFINQA6234 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . a0 a0system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 111667</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.8 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 50 million in loans were outstanding under the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis federal regulation see the 201crate , cost-recovery , and other regulation 2013 federal regulation 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of federal regulation . complaint against system energy in january 2017 the apsc and mpsc filed a complaint with the ferc against system energy . the complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the unit power sales agreement pursuant to which system energy sells its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans . entergy arkansas also sells some of its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans under separate agreements . the current return on equity under the unit power sales agreement is 10.94% ( 10.94 % ) . the complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive . the complaint requests the ferc to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity , and also requests that the ferc establish january 23 , 2017 as a refund effective date . the complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for system energy is between 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) and 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) . system energy answered the complaint in february 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) to 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) is just and reasonable . the lpsc and the city council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint . system energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding . in september 2017 the ferc established a refund effective date of january 23 , 2017 , consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in unit power sales agreement below , and directed the parties to engage in settlement .
Question: what is the balance of system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2017?
| 111667.0 |
CONVFINQA6235 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . a0 a0system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 111667</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.8 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 50 million in loans were outstanding under the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis federal regulation see the 201crate , cost-recovery , and other regulation 2013 federal regulation 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of federal regulation . complaint against system energy in january 2017 the apsc and mpsc filed a complaint with the ferc against system energy . the complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the unit power sales agreement pursuant to which system energy sells its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans . entergy arkansas also sells some of its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans under separate agreements . the current return on equity under the unit power sales agreement is 10.94% ( 10.94 % ) . the complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive . the complaint requests the ferc to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity , and also requests that the ferc establish january 23 , 2017 as a refund effective date . the complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for system energy is between 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) and 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) . system energy answered the complaint in february 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) to 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) is just and reasonable . the lpsc and the city council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint . system energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding . in september 2017 the ferc established a refund effective date of january 23 , 2017 , consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in unit power sales agreement below , and directed the parties to engage in settlement .
Question: what is the balance of system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2017?
Answer: 111667.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| 2373.0 |
CONVFINQA6236 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . a0 a0system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 111667</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.8 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 50 million in loans were outstanding under the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis federal regulation see the 201crate , cost-recovery , and other regulation 2013 federal regulation 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of federal regulation . complaint against system energy in january 2017 the apsc and mpsc filed a complaint with the ferc against system energy . the complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the unit power sales agreement pursuant to which system energy sells its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans . entergy arkansas also sells some of its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans under separate agreements . the current return on equity under the unit power sales agreement is 10.94% ( 10.94 % ) . the complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive . the complaint requests the ferc to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity , and also requests that the ferc establish january 23 , 2017 as a refund effective date . the complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for system energy is between 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) and 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) . system energy answered the complaint in february 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) to 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) is just and reasonable . the lpsc and the city council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint . system energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding . in september 2017 the ferc established a refund effective date of january 23 , 2017 , consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in unit power sales agreement below , and directed the parties to engage in settlement .
Question: what is the balance of system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2017?
Answer: 111667.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 2373.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 109294.0 |
CONVFINQA6237 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . a0 a0system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 111667</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.8 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 50 million in loans were outstanding under the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis federal regulation see the 201crate , cost-recovery , and other regulation 2013 federal regulation 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of federal regulation . complaint against system energy in january 2017 the apsc and mpsc filed a complaint with the ferc against system energy . the complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the unit power sales agreement pursuant to which system energy sells its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans . entergy arkansas also sells some of its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans under separate agreements . the current return on equity under the unit power sales agreement is 10.94% ( 10.94 % ) . the complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive . the complaint requests the ferc to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity , and also requests that the ferc establish january 23 , 2017 as a refund effective date . the complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for system energy is between 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) and 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) . system energy answered the complaint in february 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) to 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) is just and reasonable . the lpsc and the city council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint . system energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding . in september 2017 the ferc established a refund effective date of january 23 , 2017 , consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in unit power sales agreement below , and directed the parties to engage in settlement .
Question: what is the balance of system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2017?
Answer: 111667.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 2373.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 109294.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 46.05731 |
CONVFINQA6238 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in ups from 2012 to 2017?
| 95.75 |
CONVFINQA6239 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in ups from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 95.75
Question: what percentage changes does this represent?
| 0.9575 |
CONVFINQA6240 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in ups from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 95.75
Question: what percentage changes does this represent?
Answer: 0.9575
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in dow jones from 2012 to 2017?
| 113.49 |
CONVFINQA6241 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in ups from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 95.75
Question: what percentage changes does this represent?
Answer: 0.9575
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in dow jones from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 113.49
Question: what percentage changes does this represent?
| 1.1349 |
CONVFINQA6242 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in ups from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 95.75
Question: what percentage changes does this represent?
Answer: 0.9575
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in dow jones from 2012 to 2017?
Answer: 113.49
Question: what percentage changes does this represent?
Answer: 1.1349
Question: what is the difference between return on investment on ups and dow jones?
| -0.1774 |
CONVFINQA6243 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 78.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>3.2</td><td>8.8</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-4.9 ( 4.9 )</td><td>-1.0 ( 1.0 )</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations</td><td>-14.0 ( 14.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td><td>-1.6 ( 1.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>assumed in connection with acquisitions</td><td>10.0</td><td>-</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2.1</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 61.5</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?
| 1.3 |
CONVFINQA6244 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 78.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>3.2</td><td>8.8</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-4.9 ( 4.9 )</td><td>-1.0 ( 1.0 )</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations</td><td>-14.0 ( 14.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td><td>-1.6 ( 1.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>assumed in connection with acquisitions</td><td>10.0</td><td>-</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2.1</td><td>-1.1 ( 1.1 )</td><td>-4.2 ( 4.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 61.5</td><td>$ 75.9</td><td>$ 74.6</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 1.3
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.01743 |
CONVFINQA6245 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual obligations significant contractual obligations as of december 29 , 2018 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1 20133 years</td><td>payments due by period 3 20135 years</td><td>payments due by period more than5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>$ 835</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 314</td><td>$ 171</td><td>$ 121</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital purchase obligations1</td><td>9029</td><td>7888</td><td>795</td><td>345</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other purchase obligations and commitments2</td><td>3249</td><td>1272</td><td>1781</td><td>178</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tax obligations3</td><td>4732</td><td>143</td><td>426</td><td>1234</td><td>2929</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>long-term debt obligations4</td><td>40187</td><td>1518</td><td>7583</td><td>6173</td><td>24913</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities5</td><td>1626</td><td>722</td><td>708</td><td>95</td><td>101</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total6</td><td>$ 59658</td><td>$ 11772</td><td>$ 11607</td><td>$ 8196</td><td>$ 28083</td></tr></table> capital purchase obligations1 9029 7888 795 345 1 other purchase obligations and commitments2 3249 1272 1781 178 18 tax obligations3 4732 143 426 1234 2929 long-term debt obligations4 40187 1518 7583 6173 24913 other long-term liabilities5 1626 722 708 95 101 total6 $ 59658 $ 11772 $ 11607 $ 8196 $ 28083 1 capital purchase obligations represent commitments for the construction or purchase of property , plant and equipment . they were not recorded as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of december 29 , 2018 , as we had not yet received the related goods nor taken title to the property . 2 other purchase obligations and commitments include payments due under various types of licenses and agreements to purchase goods or services , as well as payments due under non-contingent funding obligations . 3 tax obligations represent the future cash payments related to tax reform enacted in 2017 for the one-time transition tax on our previously untaxed foreign earnings . for further information , see 201cnote 9 : income taxes 201d within the consolidated financial statements . 4 amounts represent principal payments for all debt obligations and interest payments for fixed-rate debt obligations . interest payments on floating-rate debt obligations , as well as the impact of fixed-rate to floating-rate debt swaps , are excluded . debt obligations are classified based on their stated maturity date , regardless of their classification on the consolidated balance sheets . any future settlement of convertible debt would impact our cash payments . 5 amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy other long-term liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , including the short-term portion of these long-term liabilities . derivative instruments are excluded from the preceding table , as they do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid . 6 total excludes contractual obligations already recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as current liabilities , except for the short-term portions of long-term debt obligations and other long-term liabilities . the expected timing of payments of the obligations in the preceding table is estimated based on current information . timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different , depending on the time of receipt of goods or services , or changes to agreed- upon amounts for some obligations . contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services included in 201cother purchase obligations and commitments 201d in the preceding table include agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . for obligations with cancellation provisions , the amounts included in the preceding table were limited to the non-cancelable portion of the agreement terms or the minimum cancellation fee . for the purchase of raw materials , we have entered into certain agreements that specify minimum prices and quantities based on a percentage of the total available market or based on a percentage of our future purchasing requirements . due to the uncertainty of the future market and our future purchasing requirements , as well as the non-binding nature of these agreements , obligations under these agreements have been excluded from the preceding table . our purchase orders for other products are based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons . in addition , some of our purchase orders represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements . contractual obligations that are contingent upon the achievement of certain milestones have been excluded from the preceding table . most of our milestone-based contracts are tooling related for the purchase of capital equipment . these arrangements are not considered contractual obligations until the milestone is met by the counterparty . as of december 29 , 2018 , assuming that all future milestones are met , the additional required payments would be approximately $ 688 million . for the majority of restricted stock units ( rsus ) granted , the number of shares of common stock issued on the date the rsus vest is net of the minimum statutory withholding requirements that we pay in cash to the appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our employees . the obligation to pay the relevant taxing authority is excluded from the preceding table , as the amount is contingent upon continued employment . in addition , the amount of the obligation is unknown , as it is based in part on the market price of our common stock when the awards vest . md&a consolidated results and analysis 42 .
Question: as of december 29, 2018 what percentage of the total of payments were due in less than 1 year?
| 0.19732 |
CONVFINQA6246 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual obligations significant contractual obligations as of december 29 , 2018 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1 20133 years</td><td>payments due by period 3 20135 years</td><td>payments due by period more than5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>$ 835</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 314</td><td>$ 171</td><td>$ 121</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital purchase obligations1</td><td>9029</td><td>7888</td><td>795</td><td>345</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other purchase obligations and commitments2</td><td>3249</td><td>1272</td><td>1781</td><td>178</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tax obligations3</td><td>4732</td><td>143</td><td>426</td><td>1234</td><td>2929</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>long-term debt obligations4</td><td>40187</td><td>1518</td><td>7583</td><td>6173</td><td>24913</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities5</td><td>1626</td><td>722</td><td>708</td><td>95</td><td>101</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total6</td><td>$ 59658</td><td>$ 11772</td><td>$ 11607</td><td>$ 8196</td><td>$ 28083</td></tr></table> capital purchase obligations1 9029 7888 795 345 1 other purchase obligations and commitments2 3249 1272 1781 178 18 tax obligations3 4732 143 426 1234 2929 long-term debt obligations4 40187 1518 7583 6173 24913 other long-term liabilities5 1626 722 708 95 101 total6 $ 59658 $ 11772 $ 11607 $ 8196 $ 28083 1 capital purchase obligations represent commitments for the construction or purchase of property , plant and equipment . they were not recorded as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of december 29 , 2018 , as we had not yet received the related goods nor taken title to the property . 2 other purchase obligations and commitments include payments due under various types of licenses and agreements to purchase goods or services , as well as payments due under non-contingent funding obligations . 3 tax obligations represent the future cash payments related to tax reform enacted in 2017 for the one-time transition tax on our previously untaxed foreign earnings . for further information , see 201cnote 9 : income taxes 201d within the consolidated financial statements . 4 amounts represent principal payments for all debt obligations and interest payments for fixed-rate debt obligations . interest payments on floating-rate debt obligations , as well as the impact of fixed-rate to floating-rate debt swaps , are excluded . debt obligations are classified based on their stated maturity date , regardless of their classification on the consolidated balance sheets . any future settlement of convertible debt would impact our cash payments . 5 amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy other long-term liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , including the short-term portion of these long-term liabilities . derivative instruments are excluded from the preceding table , as they do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid . 6 total excludes contractual obligations already recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as current liabilities , except for the short-term portions of long-term debt obligations and other long-term liabilities . the expected timing of payments of the obligations in the preceding table is estimated based on current information . timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different , depending on the time of receipt of goods or services , or changes to agreed- upon amounts for some obligations . contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services included in 201cother purchase obligations and commitments 201d in the preceding table include agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . for obligations with cancellation provisions , the amounts included in the preceding table were limited to the non-cancelable portion of the agreement terms or the minimum cancellation fee . for the purchase of raw materials , we have entered into certain agreements that specify minimum prices and quantities based on a percentage of the total available market or based on a percentage of our future purchasing requirements . due to the uncertainty of the future market and our future purchasing requirements , as well as the non-binding nature of these agreements , obligations under these agreements have been excluded from the preceding table . our purchase orders for other products are based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons . in addition , some of our purchase orders represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements . contractual obligations that are contingent upon the achievement of certain milestones have been excluded from the preceding table . most of our milestone-based contracts are tooling related for the purchase of capital equipment . these arrangements are not considered contractual obligations until the milestone is met by the counterparty . as of december 29 , 2018 , assuming that all future milestones are met , the additional required payments would be approximately $ 688 million . for the majority of restricted stock units ( rsus ) granted , the number of shares of common stock issued on the date the rsus vest is net of the minimum statutory withholding requirements that we pay in cash to the appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our employees . the obligation to pay the relevant taxing authority is excluded from the preceding table , as the amount is contingent upon continued employment . in addition , the amount of the obligation is unknown , as it is based in part on the market price of our common stock when the awards vest . md&a consolidated results and analysis 42 .
Question: as of december 29, 2018 what percentage of the total of payments were due in less than 1 year?
Answer: 0.19732
Question: and what percentage of the total operating lease obligations were due 1 20133 years?
| 0.37605 |
CONVFINQA6247 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis sources of capital entergy mississippi's sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt or preferred stock issuances ; and bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy mississippi may refinance or redeem debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy mississippi has two separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 50 million and renewed both facilities through may 2009 . borrowings under the credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in entergy mississippi's accounts receivable . no borrowings were outstanding under either credit facility as of december 31 , 2008 . entergy mississippi has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 175 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi's short-term borrowing limits . entergy mississippi has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long-term authorization extends through june 30 , 2009 . entergy mississippi's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 66044 )</td><td>$ 20997</td><td>$ 39573</td><td>( $ 84066 )</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 6.6 million of entergy mississippi's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . formula rate plan in march 2008 , entergy mississippi made its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2007 test year with the mpsc . the filing showed that a $ 10.1 million increase in annual electric revenues is warranted . in june 2008 , entergy mississippi reached a settlement with the mississippi public utilities staff that would result in a $ 3.8 million rate increase . in january 2009 the mpsc rejected the settlement and left the current rates in effect . entergy mississippi appealed the mpsc's decision to the mississippi supreme court. .
Question: how was the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool between 2007 and 2008?
| 87041.0 |
CONVFINQA6248 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis sources of capital entergy mississippi's sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt or preferred stock issuances ; and bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy mississippi may refinance or redeem debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy mississippi has two separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 50 million and renewed both facilities through may 2009 . borrowings under the credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in entergy mississippi's accounts receivable . no borrowings were outstanding under either credit facility as of december 31 , 2008 . entergy mississippi has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 175 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi's short-term borrowing limits . entergy mississippi has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long-term authorization extends through june 30 , 2009 . entergy mississippi's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 66044 )</td><td>$ 20997</td><td>$ 39573</td><td>( $ 84066 )</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 6.6 million of entergy mississippi's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . formula rate plan in march 2008 , entergy mississippi made its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2007 test year with the mpsc . the filing showed that a $ 10.1 million increase in annual electric revenues is warranted . in june 2008 , entergy mississippi reached a settlement with the mississippi public utilities staff that would result in a $ 3.8 million rate increase . in january 2009 the mpsc rejected the settlement and left the current rates in effect . entergy mississippi appealed the mpsc's decision to the mississippi supreme court. .
Question: how was the cash flow of entergy mississippi affected by the balance in money pool between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 87041.0
Question: and between 2006 and 2007?
| 18576.0 |
CONVFINQA6249 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term obligations excluding capital leases</td><td>888810</td><td>753045</td><td>700608</td><td>1787451</td><td>3159286</td><td>7188751</td><td>14477951</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest expense</td><td>550000</td><td>517000</td><td>485000</td><td>399000</td><td>315000</td><td>654000</td><td>2920000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease payments ( including interest )</td><td>15589</td><td>14049</td><td>12905</td><td>12456</td><td>10760</td><td>173313</td><td>239072</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt service obligations</td><td>1454399</td><td>1284094</td><td>1198513</td><td>2198907</td><td>3485046</td><td>8016064</td><td>17637023</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating lease payments ( 11 )</td><td>574438</td><td>553864</td><td>538405</td><td>519034</td><td>502847</td><td>4214600</td><td>6903188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other non-current liabilities ( 12 ) ( 13 )</td><td>11082</td><td>20480</td><td>5705</td><td>13911</td><td>4186</td><td>1860071</td><td>1915435</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2039919</td><td>$ 1858438</td><td>$ 1742623</td><td>$ 2731852</td><td>$ 3992079</td><td>$ 14090735</td><td>$ 26455646</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2043 . ( 2 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2048 . ( 3 ) in connection with our acquisition of mipt on october 1 , 2013 , we assumed approximately $ 1.49 billion aggregate principal amount of secured notes , $ 250.0 million of which we repaid in august 2014 . the gtp notes have anticipated repayment dates beginning june 15 , 2016 . ( 4 ) assumed in connection with our acquisition of br towers and denominated in brl . the br towers debenture amortizes through october 2023 . the br towers credit facility amortizes through january 15 , ( 5 ) assumed by us in connection with the unison acquisition , and have anticipated repayment dates of april 15 , 2017 , april 15 , 2020 and april 15 , 2020 , respectively , and a final maturity date of april 15 , 2040 . ( 6 ) denominated in mxn . ( 7 ) denominated in zar and amortizes through march 31 , 2020 . ( 8 ) denominated in cop and amortizes through april 24 , 2021 . ( 9 ) reflects balances owed to our joint venture partners in ghana and uganda . the ghana loan is denominated in ghs and the uganda loan is denominated in usd . ( 10 ) on february 11 , 2015 , we redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes in accordance with the terms thereof . ( 11 ) includes payments under non-cancellable initial terms , as well as payments for certain renewal periods at our option , which we expect to renew because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable communications sites and related revenues from tenant leases . ( 12 ) primarily represents our asset retirement obligations and excludes certain other non-current liabilities included in our consolidated balance sheet , primarily our straight-line rent liability for which cash payments are included in operating lease payments and unearned revenue that is not payable in cash . ( 13 ) excludes $ 26.6 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax positions and $ 24.9 million of accrued income tax related interest and penalties included in our consolidated balance sheet as we are uncertain as to when and if the amounts may be settled . settlement of such amounts could require the use of cash flows generated from operations . we expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , we are currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . off-balance sheet arrangements . we have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( ii ) of sec regulation s-k . interest rate swap agreements . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to variability in interest rates on debt in colombia and south africa . all of our interest rate swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and have an aggregate notional amount of $ 79.9 million , interest rates ranging from 5.74% ( 5.74 % ) to 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and expiration dates through april 2021 . in february 2014 , we repaid the costa rica loan and subsequently terminated the associated interest rate swap agreements . additionally , in connection with entering into the colombian credit facility in october 2014 , we terminated our pre-existing interest rate .
Question: what was the sum of the minimum and the maximum interest rates?
| 13.57 |
CONVFINQA6250 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term obligations excluding capital leases</td><td>888810</td><td>753045</td><td>700608</td><td>1787451</td><td>3159286</td><td>7188751</td><td>14477951</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest expense</td><td>550000</td><td>517000</td><td>485000</td><td>399000</td><td>315000</td><td>654000</td><td>2920000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease payments ( including interest )</td><td>15589</td><td>14049</td><td>12905</td><td>12456</td><td>10760</td><td>173313</td><td>239072</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt service obligations</td><td>1454399</td><td>1284094</td><td>1198513</td><td>2198907</td><td>3485046</td><td>8016064</td><td>17637023</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating lease payments ( 11 )</td><td>574438</td><td>553864</td><td>538405</td><td>519034</td><td>502847</td><td>4214600</td><td>6903188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other non-current liabilities ( 12 ) ( 13 )</td><td>11082</td><td>20480</td><td>5705</td><td>13911</td><td>4186</td><td>1860071</td><td>1915435</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2039919</td><td>$ 1858438</td><td>$ 1742623</td><td>$ 2731852</td><td>$ 3992079</td><td>$ 14090735</td><td>$ 26455646</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2043 . ( 2 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2048 . ( 3 ) in connection with our acquisition of mipt on october 1 , 2013 , we assumed approximately $ 1.49 billion aggregate principal amount of secured notes , $ 250.0 million of which we repaid in august 2014 . the gtp notes have anticipated repayment dates beginning june 15 , 2016 . ( 4 ) assumed in connection with our acquisition of br towers and denominated in brl . the br towers debenture amortizes through october 2023 . the br towers credit facility amortizes through january 15 , ( 5 ) assumed by us in connection with the unison acquisition , and have anticipated repayment dates of april 15 , 2017 , april 15 , 2020 and april 15 , 2020 , respectively , and a final maturity date of april 15 , 2040 . ( 6 ) denominated in mxn . ( 7 ) denominated in zar and amortizes through march 31 , 2020 . ( 8 ) denominated in cop and amortizes through april 24 , 2021 . ( 9 ) reflects balances owed to our joint venture partners in ghana and uganda . the ghana loan is denominated in ghs and the uganda loan is denominated in usd . ( 10 ) on february 11 , 2015 , we redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes in accordance with the terms thereof . ( 11 ) includes payments under non-cancellable initial terms , as well as payments for certain renewal periods at our option , which we expect to renew because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable communications sites and related revenues from tenant leases . ( 12 ) primarily represents our asset retirement obligations and excludes certain other non-current liabilities included in our consolidated balance sheet , primarily our straight-line rent liability for which cash payments are included in operating lease payments and unearned revenue that is not payable in cash . ( 13 ) excludes $ 26.6 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax positions and $ 24.9 million of accrued income tax related interest and penalties included in our consolidated balance sheet as we are uncertain as to when and if the amounts may be settled . settlement of such amounts could require the use of cash flows generated from operations . we expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , we are currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . off-balance sheet arrangements . we have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( ii ) of sec regulation s-k . interest rate swap agreements . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to variability in interest rates on debt in colombia and south africa . all of our interest rate swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and have an aggregate notional amount of $ 79.9 million , interest rates ranging from 5.74% ( 5.74 % ) to 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and expiration dates through april 2021 . in february 2014 , we repaid the costa rica loan and subsequently terminated the associated interest rate swap agreements . additionally , in connection with entering into the colombian credit facility in october 2014 , we terminated our pre-existing interest rate .
Question: what was the sum of the minimum and the maximum interest rates?
Answer: 13.57
Question: and what is the average between those two interest rates?
| 6.785 |
CONVFINQA6251 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term obligations excluding capital leases</td><td>888810</td><td>753045</td><td>700608</td><td>1787451</td><td>3159286</td><td>7188751</td><td>14477951</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest expense</td><td>550000</td><td>517000</td><td>485000</td><td>399000</td><td>315000</td><td>654000</td><td>2920000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease payments ( including interest )</td><td>15589</td><td>14049</td><td>12905</td><td>12456</td><td>10760</td><td>173313</td><td>239072</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt service obligations</td><td>1454399</td><td>1284094</td><td>1198513</td><td>2198907</td><td>3485046</td><td>8016064</td><td>17637023</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating lease payments ( 11 )</td><td>574438</td><td>553864</td><td>538405</td><td>519034</td><td>502847</td><td>4214600</td><td>6903188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other non-current liabilities ( 12 ) ( 13 )</td><td>11082</td><td>20480</td><td>5705</td><td>13911</td><td>4186</td><td>1860071</td><td>1915435</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2039919</td><td>$ 1858438</td><td>$ 1742623</td><td>$ 2731852</td><td>$ 3992079</td><td>$ 14090735</td><td>$ 26455646</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2043 . ( 2 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2048 . ( 3 ) in connection with our acquisition of mipt on october 1 , 2013 , we assumed approximately $ 1.49 billion aggregate principal amount of secured notes , $ 250.0 million of which we repaid in august 2014 . the gtp notes have anticipated repayment dates beginning june 15 , 2016 . ( 4 ) assumed in connection with our acquisition of br towers and denominated in brl . the br towers debenture amortizes through october 2023 . the br towers credit facility amortizes through january 15 , ( 5 ) assumed by us in connection with the unison acquisition , and have anticipated repayment dates of april 15 , 2017 , april 15 , 2020 and april 15 , 2020 , respectively , and a final maturity date of april 15 , 2040 . ( 6 ) denominated in mxn . ( 7 ) denominated in zar and amortizes through march 31 , 2020 . ( 8 ) denominated in cop and amortizes through april 24 , 2021 . ( 9 ) reflects balances owed to our joint venture partners in ghana and uganda . the ghana loan is denominated in ghs and the uganda loan is denominated in usd . ( 10 ) on february 11 , 2015 , we redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes in accordance with the terms thereof . ( 11 ) includes payments under non-cancellable initial terms , as well as payments for certain renewal periods at our option , which we expect to renew because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable communications sites and related revenues from tenant leases . ( 12 ) primarily represents our asset retirement obligations and excludes certain other non-current liabilities included in our consolidated balance sheet , primarily our straight-line rent liability for which cash payments are included in operating lease payments and unearned revenue that is not payable in cash . ( 13 ) excludes $ 26.6 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax positions and $ 24.9 million of accrued income tax related interest and penalties included in our consolidated balance sheet as we are uncertain as to when and if the amounts may be settled . settlement of such amounts could require the use of cash flows generated from operations . we expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , we are currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . off-balance sheet arrangements . we have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( ii ) of sec regulation s-k . interest rate swap agreements . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to variability in interest rates on debt in colombia and south africa . all of our interest rate swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and have an aggregate notional amount of $ 79.9 million , interest rates ranging from 5.74% ( 5.74 % ) to 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and expiration dates through april 2021 . in february 2014 , we repaid the costa rica loan and subsequently terminated the associated interest rate swap agreements . additionally , in connection with entering into the colombian credit facility in october 2014 , we terminated our pre-existing interest rate .
Question: what was the sum of the minimum and the maximum interest rates?
Answer: 13.57
Question: and what is the average between those two interest rates?
Answer: 6.785
Question: how much is this average interest rate numerically, or as a portion of the number one?
| 0.06785 |
CONVFINQA6252 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term obligations excluding capital leases</td><td>888810</td><td>753045</td><td>700608</td><td>1787451</td><td>3159286</td><td>7188751</td><td>14477951</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest expense</td><td>550000</td><td>517000</td><td>485000</td><td>399000</td><td>315000</td><td>654000</td><td>2920000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease payments ( including interest )</td><td>15589</td><td>14049</td><td>12905</td><td>12456</td><td>10760</td><td>173313</td><td>239072</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt service obligations</td><td>1454399</td><td>1284094</td><td>1198513</td><td>2198907</td><td>3485046</td><td>8016064</td><td>17637023</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating lease payments ( 11 )</td><td>574438</td><td>553864</td><td>538405</td><td>519034</td><td>502847</td><td>4214600</td><td>6903188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other non-current liabilities ( 12 ) ( 13 )</td><td>11082</td><td>20480</td><td>5705</td><td>13911</td><td>4186</td><td>1860071</td><td>1915435</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2039919</td><td>$ 1858438</td><td>$ 1742623</td><td>$ 2731852</td><td>$ 3992079</td><td>$ 14090735</td><td>$ 26455646</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2043 . ( 2 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2048 . ( 3 ) in connection with our acquisition of mipt on october 1 , 2013 , we assumed approximately $ 1.49 billion aggregate principal amount of secured notes , $ 250.0 million of which we repaid in august 2014 . the gtp notes have anticipated repayment dates beginning june 15 , 2016 . ( 4 ) assumed in connection with our acquisition of br towers and denominated in brl . the br towers debenture amortizes through october 2023 . the br towers credit facility amortizes through january 15 , ( 5 ) assumed by us in connection with the unison acquisition , and have anticipated repayment dates of april 15 , 2017 , april 15 , 2020 and april 15 , 2020 , respectively , and a final maturity date of april 15 , 2040 . ( 6 ) denominated in mxn . ( 7 ) denominated in zar and amortizes through march 31 , 2020 . ( 8 ) denominated in cop and amortizes through april 24 , 2021 . ( 9 ) reflects balances owed to our joint venture partners in ghana and uganda . the ghana loan is denominated in ghs and the uganda loan is denominated in usd . ( 10 ) on february 11 , 2015 , we redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes in accordance with the terms thereof . ( 11 ) includes payments under non-cancellable initial terms , as well as payments for certain renewal periods at our option , which we expect to renew because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable communications sites and related revenues from tenant leases . ( 12 ) primarily represents our asset retirement obligations and excludes certain other non-current liabilities included in our consolidated balance sheet , primarily our straight-line rent liability for which cash payments are included in operating lease payments and unearned revenue that is not payable in cash . ( 13 ) excludes $ 26.6 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax positions and $ 24.9 million of accrued income tax related interest and penalties included in our consolidated balance sheet as we are uncertain as to when and if the amounts may be settled . settlement of such amounts could require the use of cash flows generated from operations . we expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , we are currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . off-balance sheet arrangements . we have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( ii ) of sec regulation s-k . interest rate swap agreements . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to variability in interest rates on debt in colombia and south africa . all of our interest rate swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and have an aggregate notional amount of $ 79.9 million , interest rates ranging from 5.74% ( 5.74 % ) to 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and expiration dates through april 2021 . in february 2014 , we repaid the costa rica loan and subsequently terminated the associated interest rate swap agreements . additionally , in connection with entering into the colombian credit facility in october 2014 , we terminated our pre-existing interest rate .
Question: what was the sum of the minimum and the maximum interest rates?
Answer: 13.57
Question: and what is the average between those two interest rates?
Answer: 6.785
Question: how much is this average interest rate numerically, or as a portion of the number one?
Answer: 0.06785
Question: what, then, is the amount from the aggregate notional amount that is represented by that average interest rate, in millions?
| 5.42122 |
CONVFINQA6253 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>sharespurchased ( a )</td><td>averagepricepaid pershare</td><td>sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms</td><td>maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2008</td><td>25394</td><td>$ -</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2008</td><td>7526</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2008</td><td>40</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>32960</td><td>$ -</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr></table> ( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .
Question: what was the total number of shares purchased in the months of october and november of 2008, combined?
| 32920.0 |
CONVFINQA6254 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>sharespurchased ( a )</td><td>averagepricepaid pershare</td><td>sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms</td><td>maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2008</td><td>25394</td><td>$ -</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2008</td><td>7526</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2008</td><td>40</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>32960</td><td>$ -</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr></table> ( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .
Question: what was the total number of shares purchased in the months of october and november of 2008, combined?
Answer: 32920.0
Question: including december, what then becomes that total?
| 32960.0 |
CONVFINQA6255 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>sharespurchased ( a )</td><td>averagepricepaid pershare</td><td>sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms</td><td>maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2008</td><td>25394</td><td>$ -</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2008</td><td>7526</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2008</td><td>40</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>32960</td><td>$ -</td><td>-</td><td>19201518</td></tr></table> ( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .
Question: what was the total number of shares purchased in the months of october and november of 2008, combined?
Answer: 32920.0
Question: including december, what then becomes that total?
Answer: 32960.0
Question: and what was the average number of shares purchased between those three months?
| 10986.66667 |
CONVFINQA6256 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>3/31/2010</td><td>3/31/2011</td><td>3/31/2012</td><td>3/31/2013</td><td>3/31/2014</td><td>3/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>abiomed inc</td><td>100</td><td>140.79</td><td>215.02</td><td>180.91</td><td>252.33</td><td>693.60</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite index</td><td>100</td><td>115.98</td><td>128.93</td><td>136.26</td><td>175.11</td><td>204.38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849</td><td>100</td><td>108.31</td><td>115.05</td><td>105.56</td><td>123.18</td><td>118.95</td></tr></table> this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .
Question: what is the net change in price of the nasdaq composite index from 2010 to 2013?
| 36.26 |
CONVFINQA6257 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>3/31/2010</td><td>3/31/2011</td><td>3/31/2012</td><td>3/31/2013</td><td>3/31/2014</td><td>3/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>abiomed inc</td><td>100</td><td>140.79</td><td>215.02</td><td>180.91</td><td>252.33</td><td>693.60</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite index</td><td>100</td><td>115.98</td><td>128.93</td><td>136.26</td><td>175.11</td><td>204.38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849</td><td>100</td><td>108.31</td><td>115.05</td><td>105.56</td><td>123.18</td><td>118.95</td></tr></table> this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .
Question: what is the net change in price of the nasdaq composite index from 2010 to 2013?
Answer: 36.26
Question: what is that over the 2010 price?
| 0.3626 |
CONVFINQA6258 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>the priceline group inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>117.06</td><td>100.53</td><td>102.11</td><td>102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>155.27</td><td>116.92</td><td>118.45</td><td>122.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>290.93</td><td>166.19</td><td>156.82</td><td>199.42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>285.37</td><td>188.78</td><td>178.29</td><td>195.42</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015</td><td>319.10</td><td>199.95</td><td>180.75</td><td>267.25</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the 2015 value of priceline less 100?
| 219.1 |
CONVFINQA6259 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>the priceline group inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>117.06</td><td>100.53</td><td>102.11</td><td>102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>155.27</td><td>116.92</td><td>118.45</td><td>122.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>290.93</td><td>166.19</td><td>156.82</td><td>199.42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>285.37</td><td>188.78</td><td>178.29</td><td>195.42</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015</td><td>319.10</td><td>199.95</td><td>180.75</td><td>267.25</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the 2015 value of priceline less 100?
Answer: 219.1
Question: what is the percent change?
| 2.191 |
CONVFINQA6260 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>the priceline group inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>117.06</td><td>100.53</td><td>102.11</td><td>102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>155.27</td><td>116.92</td><td>118.45</td><td>122.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>290.93</td><td>166.19</td><td>156.82</td><td>199.42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>285.37</td><td>188.78</td><td>178.29</td><td>195.42</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015</td><td>319.10</td><td>199.95</td><td>180.75</td><td>267.25</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the 2015 value of priceline less 100?
Answer: 219.1
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 2.191
Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
| 180.75 |
CONVFINQA6261 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>the priceline group inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>117.06</td><td>100.53</td><td>102.11</td><td>102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>155.27</td><td>116.92</td><td>118.45</td><td>122.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>290.93</td><td>166.19</td><td>156.82</td><td>199.42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>285.37</td><td>188.78</td><td>178.29</td><td>195.42</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015</td><td>319.10</td><td>199.95</td><td>180.75</td><td>267.25</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the 2015 value of priceline less 100?
Answer: 219.1
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 2.191
Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
Answer: 180.75
Question: what is that less 100?
| 80.75 |
CONVFINQA6262 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>the priceline group inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>117.06</td><td>100.53</td><td>102.11</td><td>102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>155.27</td><td>116.92</td><td>118.45</td><td>122.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>290.93</td><td>166.19</td><td>156.82</td><td>199.42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>285.37</td><td>188.78</td><td>178.29</td><td>195.42</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015</td><td>319.10</td><td>199.95</td><td>180.75</td><td>267.25</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the 2015 value of priceline less 100?
Answer: 219.1
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 2.191
Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
Answer: 180.75
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer: 80.75
Question: what is the difference divided by 100?
| 0.8075 |
CONVFINQA6263 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>the priceline group inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>117.06</td><td>100.53</td><td>102.11</td><td>102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>155.27</td><td>116.92</td><td>118.45</td><td>122.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>290.93</td><td>166.19</td><td>156.82</td><td>199.42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>285.37</td><td>188.78</td><td>178.29</td><td>195.42</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015</td><td>319.10</td><td>199.95</td><td>180.75</td><td>267.25</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the 2015 value of priceline less 100?
Answer: 219.1
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 2.191
Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
Answer: 180.75
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer: 80.75
Question: what is the difference divided by 100?
Answer: 0.8075
Question: what is the difference in percent changes?
| 1.3835 |
CONVFINQA6264 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what was the sum of working capital in 2014 and 2015?
| 1695.0 |
CONVFINQA6265 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what was the sum of working capital in 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 1695.0
Question: what was the average value over those 2 years?
| 847.5 |
CONVFINQA6266 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what was the sum of working capital in 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 1695.0
Question: what was the average value over those 2 years?
Answer: 847.5
Question: what is the percent of average working capital by total revenue in 2015?
| 8.76224 |
CONVFINQA6267 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities . in april 2009 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments . this new guidance amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities . for available for sale debt securities that the company has no intent to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery , only the credit loss component of the impairment would be recognized in earnings , while the rest of the fair value loss would be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company adopted this guidance effective april 1 , 2009 . upon adoption the company recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment increase in retained earnings ( deficit ) and decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) as follows : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cumulative-effect adjustment gross</td><td>$ 65658</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tax</td><td>-8346 ( 8346 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cumulative-effect adjustment net</td><td>$ 57312</td></tr></table> measurement of fair value in inactive markets . in april 2009 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures , which reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions . it also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive . there was no impact to the company 2019s financial statements upon adoption . fair value disclosures about pension plan assets . in december 2008 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for employers 2019 disclosures about pension plan assets . this new guidance requires additional disclosures about the components of plan assets , investment strategies for plan assets and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets . the company , in conjunction with fair value measurement of plan assets , separated plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provided a roll forward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as level 3 in the 2009 annual consolidated financial statements . these disclosures had no effect on the company 2019s accounting for plan benefits and obligations . revisions to earnings per share calculation . in june 2008 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for earnings per share for determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities . this new guidance requires unvested share-based payment awards that contain non- forfeitable rights to dividends be considered as a separate class of common stock and included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method . the company 2019s restricted share awards meet this definition and are therefore included in the basic earnings per share calculation . additional disclosures for derivative instruments . in march 2008 , the fasb issued authoritative guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities , which requires enhanced disclosures on derivative instruments and hedged items . on january 1 , 2009 , the company adopted the additional disclosure for the equity index put options . no comparative information for periods prior to the effective date was required . this guidance had no impact on how the company records its derivatives. .
Question: following the adoption of the new guidance on the other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities, how much did the tax amount represent in relation to the gross cumulative-effect adjustment?
| 0.12711 |
CONVFINQA6268 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities . in april 2009 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments . this new guidance amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities . for available for sale debt securities that the company has no intent to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery , only the credit loss component of the impairment would be recognized in earnings , while the rest of the fair value loss would be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company adopted this guidance effective april 1 , 2009 . upon adoption the company recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment increase in retained earnings ( deficit ) and decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) as follows : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cumulative-effect adjustment gross</td><td>$ 65658</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tax</td><td>-8346 ( 8346 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cumulative-effect adjustment net</td><td>$ 57312</td></tr></table> measurement of fair value in inactive markets . in april 2009 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures , which reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions . it also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive . there was no impact to the company 2019s financial statements upon adoption . fair value disclosures about pension plan assets . in december 2008 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for employers 2019 disclosures about pension plan assets . this new guidance requires additional disclosures about the components of plan assets , investment strategies for plan assets and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets . the company , in conjunction with fair value measurement of plan assets , separated plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provided a roll forward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as level 3 in the 2009 annual consolidated financial statements . these disclosures had no effect on the company 2019s accounting for plan benefits and obligations . revisions to earnings per share calculation . in june 2008 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for earnings per share for determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities . this new guidance requires unvested share-based payment awards that contain non- forfeitable rights to dividends be considered as a separate class of common stock and included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method . the company 2019s restricted share awards meet this definition and are therefore included in the basic earnings per share calculation . additional disclosures for derivative instruments . in march 2008 , the fasb issued authoritative guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities , which requires enhanced disclosures on derivative instruments and hedged items . on january 1 , 2009 , the company adopted the additional disclosure for the equity index put options . no comparative information for periods prior to the effective date was required . this guidance had no impact on how the company records its derivatives. .
Question: following the adoption of the new guidance on the other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities, how much did the tax amount represent in relation to the gross cumulative-effect adjustment?
Answer: 0.12711
Question: and how much did the cumulative-effect adjustment net represent in relation to it?
| 0.87289 |
CONVFINQA6269 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities . in april 2009 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments . this new guidance amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities . for available for sale debt securities that the company has no intent to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery , only the credit loss component of the impairment would be recognized in earnings , while the rest of the fair value loss would be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company adopted this guidance effective april 1 , 2009 . upon adoption the company recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment increase in retained earnings ( deficit ) and decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) as follows : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cumulative-effect adjustment gross</td><td>$ 65658</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tax</td><td>-8346 ( 8346 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cumulative-effect adjustment net</td><td>$ 57312</td></tr></table> measurement of fair value in inactive markets . in april 2009 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures , which reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions . it also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive . there was no impact to the company 2019s financial statements upon adoption . fair value disclosures about pension plan assets . in december 2008 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for employers 2019 disclosures about pension plan assets . this new guidance requires additional disclosures about the components of plan assets , investment strategies for plan assets and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets . the company , in conjunction with fair value measurement of plan assets , separated plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provided a roll forward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as level 3 in the 2009 annual consolidated financial statements . these disclosures had no effect on the company 2019s accounting for plan benefits and obligations . revisions to earnings per share calculation . in june 2008 , the fasb revised the authoritative guidance for earnings per share for determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities . this new guidance requires unvested share-based payment awards that contain non- forfeitable rights to dividends be considered as a separate class of common stock and included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method . the company 2019s restricted share awards meet this definition and are therefore included in the basic earnings per share calculation . additional disclosures for derivative instruments . in march 2008 , the fasb issued authoritative guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities , which requires enhanced disclosures on derivative instruments and hedged items . on january 1 , 2009 , the company adopted the additional disclosure for the equity index put options . no comparative information for periods prior to the effective date was required . this guidance had no impact on how the company records its derivatives. .
Question: following the adoption of the new guidance on the other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities, how much did the tax amount represent in relation to the gross cumulative-effect adjustment?
Answer: 0.12711
Question: and how much did the cumulative-effect adjustment net represent in relation to it?
Answer: 0.87289
Question: considering those two were the only ones that composed the gross cumulative-effect adjustment, what was the percentage representation of that tax amount as the difference between the total and the percentage of the cumulative-effect adjustment net?
| 0.12711 |
CONVFINQA6270 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
continued investments in ecommerce and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 . membership and other income was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased $ 1.0 billion a0for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year . while fiscal 2018 included a $ 387 million gain from the sale of suburbia , a $ 47 million gain from a land sale , higher recycling income from our sustainability efforts and higher membership income from increased plus member penetration at sam's club , these gains were less than gains recognized in fiscal 2017 . fiscal 2017 included a $ 535 million gain from the sale of our yihaodian business and a $ 194 million gain from the sale of shopping malls in chile . for fiscal 2018 , loss on extinguishment of debt was a0$ 3.1 billion , due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt which allowed us to retire higher rate debt to reduce interest expense in future periods . our effective income tax rate was 30.4% ( 30.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 30.3% ( 30.3 % ) for both fiscal 2017 and 2016 . although relatively consistent year-over-year , our effective income tax rate may fluctuate from period to period as a result of factors including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies , valuation allowances , changes in tax laws , outcomes of administrative audits , the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among our u.s . operations and international operations . the reconciliation from the u.s . statutory rate to the effective income tax rates for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is presented in note 9 in the "notes to consolidated financial statements" and describes the impact of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 ( the "tax act" ) to the fiscal 2018 effective income tax rate . as a result of the factors discussed above , we reported $ 10.5 billion and $ 14.3 billion of consolidated net income for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which represents a decrease of $ 3.8 billion and $ 0.8 billion for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . diluted net income per common share attributable to walmart ( "eps" ) was $ 3.28 and $ 4.38 for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . walmart u.s . segment . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions except unit counts )</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2018</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2017</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 318477</td><td>$ 307833</td><td>$ 298378</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage change from comparable period</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calendar comparable sales increase</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 17869</td><td>$ 17745</td><td>$ 19087</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating income as a percentage of net sales</td><td>5.6% ( 5.6 % )</td><td>5.8% ( 5.8 % )</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unit counts at period end</td><td>4761</td><td>4672</td><td>4574</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail square feet at period end</td><td>705</td><td>699</td><td>690</td></tr></table> net sales for the walmart u.s . segment increased $ 10.6 billion or 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) and $ 9.5 billion or 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . the increases in net sales were primarily due to increases in comparable store sales of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and year-over-year growth in retail square feet of 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) and 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . additionally , for fiscal 2018 , sales generated from ecommerce acquisitions further contributed to the year-over-year increase . gross profit rate decreased 24 basis points for fiscal 2018 and increased 24 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . for fiscal 2018 , the decrease was primarily due to strategic price investments and the mix impact from ecommerce . partially offsetting the negative factors for fiscal 2018 was the positive impact of savings from procuring merchandise . for fiscal 2017 , the increase in gross profit rate was primarily due to improved margin in food and consumables , including the impact of savings in procuring merchandise and lower transportation expense from lower fuel costs . operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased 101 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 included charges related to discontinued real estate projects of $ 244 million and $ 249 million , respectively . for fiscal 2017 , the increase was primarily driven by an increase in wage expense due to the investment in the associate wage structure ; the charge related to discontinued real estate projects ; and investments in digital retail and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in fiscal 2016 . as a result of the factors discussed above , segment operating income increased $ 124 million for fiscal 2018 and decreased $ 1.3 billion for fiscal 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what were the net sales in 2018?
| 318477.0 |
CONVFINQA6271 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
continued investments in ecommerce and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 . membership and other income was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased $ 1.0 billion a0for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year . while fiscal 2018 included a $ 387 million gain from the sale of suburbia , a $ 47 million gain from a land sale , higher recycling income from our sustainability efforts and higher membership income from increased plus member penetration at sam's club , these gains were less than gains recognized in fiscal 2017 . fiscal 2017 included a $ 535 million gain from the sale of our yihaodian business and a $ 194 million gain from the sale of shopping malls in chile . for fiscal 2018 , loss on extinguishment of debt was a0$ 3.1 billion , due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt which allowed us to retire higher rate debt to reduce interest expense in future periods . our effective income tax rate was 30.4% ( 30.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 30.3% ( 30.3 % ) for both fiscal 2017 and 2016 . although relatively consistent year-over-year , our effective income tax rate may fluctuate from period to period as a result of factors including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies , valuation allowances , changes in tax laws , outcomes of administrative audits , the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among our u.s . operations and international operations . the reconciliation from the u.s . statutory rate to the effective income tax rates for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is presented in note 9 in the "notes to consolidated financial statements" and describes the impact of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 ( the "tax act" ) to the fiscal 2018 effective income tax rate . as a result of the factors discussed above , we reported $ 10.5 billion and $ 14.3 billion of consolidated net income for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which represents a decrease of $ 3.8 billion and $ 0.8 billion for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . diluted net income per common share attributable to walmart ( "eps" ) was $ 3.28 and $ 4.38 for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . walmart u.s . segment . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions except unit counts )</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2018</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2017</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 318477</td><td>$ 307833</td><td>$ 298378</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage change from comparable period</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calendar comparable sales increase</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 17869</td><td>$ 17745</td><td>$ 19087</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating income as a percentage of net sales</td><td>5.6% ( 5.6 % )</td><td>5.8% ( 5.8 % )</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unit counts at period end</td><td>4761</td><td>4672</td><td>4574</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail square feet at period end</td><td>705</td><td>699</td><td>690</td></tr></table> net sales for the walmart u.s . segment increased $ 10.6 billion or 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) and $ 9.5 billion or 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . the increases in net sales were primarily due to increases in comparable store sales of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and year-over-year growth in retail square feet of 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) and 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . additionally , for fiscal 2018 , sales generated from ecommerce acquisitions further contributed to the year-over-year increase . gross profit rate decreased 24 basis points for fiscal 2018 and increased 24 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . for fiscal 2018 , the decrease was primarily due to strategic price investments and the mix impact from ecommerce . partially offsetting the negative factors for fiscal 2018 was the positive impact of savings from procuring merchandise . for fiscal 2017 , the increase in gross profit rate was primarily due to improved margin in food and consumables , including the impact of savings in procuring merchandise and lower transportation expense from lower fuel costs . operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased 101 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 included charges related to discontinued real estate projects of $ 244 million and $ 249 million , respectively . for fiscal 2017 , the increase was primarily driven by an increase in wage expense due to the investment in the associate wage structure ; the charge related to discontinued real estate projects ; and investments in digital retail and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in fiscal 2016 . as a result of the factors discussed above , segment operating income increased $ 124 million for fiscal 2018 and decreased $ 1.3 billion for fiscal 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what were the net sales in 2018?
Answer: 318477.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
| 307833.0 |
CONVFINQA6272 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
continued investments in ecommerce and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 . membership and other income was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased $ 1.0 billion a0for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year . while fiscal 2018 included a $ 387 million gain from the sale of suburbia , a $ 47 million gain from a land sale , higher recycling income from our sustainability efforts and higher membership income from increased plus member penetration at sam's club , these gains were less than gains recognized in fiscal 2017 . fiscal 2017 included a $ 535 million gain from the sale of our yihaodian business and a $ 194 million gain from the sale of shopping malls in chile . for fiscal 2018 , loss on extinguishment of debt was a0$ 3.1 billion , due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt which allowed us to retire higher rate debt to reduce interest expense in future periods . our effective income tax rate was 30.4% ( 30.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 30.3% ( 30.3 % ) for both fiscal 2017 and 2016 . although relatively consistent year-over-year , our effective income tax rate may fluctuate from period to period as a result of factors including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies , valuation allowances , changes in tax laws , outcomes of administrative audits , the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among our u.s . operations and international operations . the reconciliation from the u.s . statutory rate to the effective income tax rates for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is presented in note 9 in the "notes to consolidated financial statements" and describes the impact of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 ( the "tax act" ) to the fiscal 2018 effective income tax rate . as a result of the factors discussed above , we reported $ 10.5 billion and $ 14.3 billion of consolidated net income for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which represents a decrease of $ 3.8 billion and $ 0.8 billion for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . diluted net income per common share attributable to walmart ( "eps" ) was $ 3.28 and $ 4.38 for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . walmart u.s . segment . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions except unit counts )</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2018</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2017</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 318477</td><td>$ 307833</td><td>$ 298378</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage change from comparable period</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calendar comparable sales increase</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 17869</td><td>$ 17745</td><td>$ 19087</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating income as a percentage of net sales</td><td>5.6% ( 5.6 % )</td><td>5.8% ( 5.8 % )</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unit counts at period end</td><td>4761</td><td>4672</td><td>4574</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail square feet at period end</td><td>705</td><td>699</td><td>690</td></tr></table> net sales for the walmart u.s . segment increased $ 10.6 billion or 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) and $ 9.5 billion or 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . the increases in net sales were primarily due to increases in comparable store sales of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and year-over-year growth in retail square feet of 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) and 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . additionally , for fiscal 2018 , sales generated from ecommerce acquisitions further contributed to the year-over-year increase . gross profit rate decreased 24 basis points for fiscal 2018 and increased 24 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . for fiscal 2018 , the decrease was primarily due to strategic price investments and the mix impact from ecommerce . partially offsetting the negative factors for fiscal 2018 was the positive impact of savings from procuring merchandise . for fiscal 2017 , the increase in gross profit rate was primarily due to improved margin in food and consumables , including the impact of savings in procuring merchandise and lower transportation expense from lower fuel costs . operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased 101 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 included charges related to discontinued real estate projects of $ 244 million and $ 249 million , respectively . for fiscal 2017 , the increase was primarily driven by an increase in wage expense due to the investment in the associate wage structure ; the charge related to discontinued real estate projects ; and investments in digital retail and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in fiscal 2016 . as a result of the factors discussed above , segment operating income increased $ 124 million for fiscal 2018 and decreased $ 1.3 billion for fiscal 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what were the net sales in 2018?
Answer: 318477.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
Answer: 307833.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 10644.0 |
CONVFINQA6273 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
continued investments in ecommerce and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 . membership and other income was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased $ 1.0 billion a0for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year . while fiscal 2018 included a $ 387 million gain from the sale of suburbia , a $ 47 million gain from a land sale , higher recycling income from our sustainability efforts and higher membership income from increased plus member penetration at sam's club , these gains were less than gains recognized in fiscal 2017 . fiscal 2017 included a $ 535 million gain from the sale of our yihaodian business and a $ 194 million gain from the sale of shopping malls in chile . for fiscal 2018 , loss on extinguishment of debt was a0$ 3.1 billion , due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt which allowed us to retire higher rate debt to reduce interest expense in future periods . our effective income tax rate was 30.4% ( 30.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 30.3% ( 30.3 % ) for both fiscal 2017 and 2016 . although relatively consistent year-over-year , our effective income tax rate may fluctuate from period to period as a result of factors including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies , valuation allowances , changes in tax laws , outcomes of administrative audits , the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among our u.s . operations and international operations . the reconciliation from the u.s . statutory rate to the effective income tax rates for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is presented in note 9 in the "notes to consolidated financial statements" and describes the impact of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 ( the "tax act" ) to the fiscal 2018 effective income tax rate . as a result of the factors discussed above , we reported $ 10.5 billion and $ 14.3 billion of consolidated net income for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which represents a decrease of $ 3.8 billion and $ 0.8 billion for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . diluted net income per common share attributable to walmart ( "eps" ) was $ 3.28 and $ 4.38 for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . walmart u.s . segment . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions except unit counts )</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2018</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2017</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 318477</td><td>$ 307833</td><td>$ 298378</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage change from comparable period</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calendar comparable sales increase</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 17869</td><td>$ 17745</td><td>$ 19087</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating income as a percentage of net sales</td><td>5.6% ( 5.6 % )</td><td>5.8% ( 5.8 % )</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unit counts at period end</td><td>4761</td><td>4672</td><td>4574</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail square feet at period end</td><td>705</td><td>699</td><td>690</td></tr></table> net sales for the walmart u.s . segment increased $ 10.6 billion or 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) and $ 9.5 billion or 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . the increases in net sales were primarily due to increases in comparable store sales of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and year-over-year growth in retail square feet of 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) and 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . additionally , for fiscal 2018 , sales generated from ecommerce acquisitions further contributed to the year-over-year increase . gross profit rate decreased 24 basis points for fiscal 2018 and increased 24 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . for fiscal 2018 , the decrease was primarily due to strategic price investments and the mix impact from ecommerce . partially offsetting the negative factors for fiscal 2018 was the positive impact of savings from procuring merchandise . for fiscal 2017 , the increase in gross profit rate was primarily due to improved margin in food and consumables , including the impact of savings in procuring merchandise and lower transportation expense from lower fuel costs . operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased 101 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 included charges related to discontinued real estate projects of $ 244 million and $ 249 million , respectively . for fiscal 2017 , the increase was primarily driven by an increase in wage expense due to the investment in the associate wage structure ; the charge related to discontinued real estate projects ; and investments in digital retail and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in fiscal 2016 . as a result of the factors discussed above , segment operating income increased $ 124 million for fiscal 2018 and decreased $ 1.3 billion for fiscal 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what were the net sales in 2018?
Answer: 318477.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
Answer: 307833.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 10644.0
Question: what were the net sales in 2017?
| 307833.0 |
CONVFINQA6274 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
continued investments in ecommerce and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 . membership and other income was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased $ 1.0 billion a0for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year . while fiscal 2018 included a $ 387 million gain from the sale of suburbia , a $ 47 million gain from a land sale , higher recycling income from our sustainability efforts and higher membership income from increased plus member penetration at sam's club , these gains were less than gains recognized in fiscal 2017 . fiscal 2017 included a $ 535 million gain from the sale of our yihaodian business and a $ 194 million gain from the sale of shopping malls in chile . for fiscal 2018 , loss on extinguishment of debt was a0$ 3.1 billion , due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt which allowed us to retire higher rate debt to reduce interest expense in future periods . our effective income tax rate was 30.4% ( 30.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 30.3% ( 30.3 % ) for both fiscal 2017 and 2016 . although relatively consistent year-over-year , our effective income tax rate may fluctuate from period to period as a result of factors including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies , valuation allowances , changes in tax laws , outcomes of administrative audits , the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among our u.s . operations and international operations . the reconciliation from the u.s . statutory rate to the effective income tax rates for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is presented in note 9 in the "notes to consolidated financial statements" and describes the impact of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 ( the "tax act" ) to the fiscal 2018 effective income tax rate . as a result of the factors discussed above , we reported $ 10.5 billion and $ 14.3 billion of consolidated net income for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which represents a decrease of $ 3.8 billion and $ 0.8 billion for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . diluted net income per common share attributable to walmart ( "eps" ) was $ 3.28 and $ 4.38 for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . walmart u.s . segment . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions except unit counts )</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2018</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2017</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 318477</td><td>$ 307833</td><td>$ 298378</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage change from comparable period</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calendar comparable sales increase</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 17869</td><td>$ 17745</td><td>$ 19087</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating income as a percentage of net sales</td><td>5.6% ( 5.6 % )</td><td>5.8% ( 5.8 % )</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unit counts at period end</td><td>4761</td><td>4672</td><td>4574</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail square feet at period end</td><td>705</td><td>699</td><td>690</td></tr></table> net sales for the walmart u.s . segment increased $ 10.6 billion or 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) and $ 9.5 billion or 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . the increases in net sales were primarily due to increases in comparable store sales of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and year-over-year growth in retail square feet of 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) and 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . additionally , for fiscal 2018 , sales generated from ecommerce acquisitions further contributed to the year-over-year increase . gross profit rate decreased 24 basis points for fiscal 2018 and increased 24 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . for fiscal 2018 , the decrease was primarily due to strategic price investments and the mix impact from ecommerce . partially offsetting the negative factors for fiscal 2018 was the positive impact of savings from procuring merchandise . for fiscal 2017 , the increase in gross profit rate was primarily due to improved margin in food and consumables , including the impact of savings in procuring merchandise and lower transportation expense from lower fuel costs . operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased 101 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 included charges related to discontinued real estate projects of $ 244 million and $ 249 million , respectively . for fiscal 2017 , the increase was primarily driven by an increase in wage expense due to the investment in the associate wage structure ; the charge related to discontinued real estate projects ; and investments in digital retail and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in fiscal 2016 . as a result of the factors discussed above , segment operating income increased $ 124 million for fiscal 2018 and decreased $ 1.3 billion for fiscal 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what were the net sales in 2018?
Answer: 318477.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
Answer: 307833.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 10644.0
Question: what were the net sales in 2017?
Answer: 307833.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to these 2017 net sales, in percentage?
| 0.03458 |
CONVFINQA6275 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual cash flows following is a summary of our contractual payment obligations related to our consolidated debt , contingent consideration , operating leases , other commitments and long-term liabilities at september 30 , 2011 ( see notes 9 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements contained this annual report ) , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>obligation</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 26677</td><td>$ 26677</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash premium on convertible notes due march 2012 ( 1 )</td><td>23558</td><td>23558</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other commitments ( 2 )</td><td>5170</td><td>3398</td><td>1772</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>37788</td><td>8247</td><td>13819</td><td>9780</td><td>5942</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contingent consideration for business combinations ( 3 )</td><td>59400</td><td>58400</td><td>1000</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities ( 4 )</td><td>34199</td><td>2683</td><td>769</td><td>146</td><td>30601</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 186792</td><td>$ 122963</td><td>$ 17360</td><td>$ 9926</td><td>$ 36543</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) cash premiums related to the 201cif converted 201d value of the 2007 convertible notes that exceed aggregate principal balance using the closing stock price of $ 17.96 on september 30 , 2011 . the actual amount of the cash premium will be calculated based on the 20 day average stock price prior to maturity . a $ 1.00 change in our stock price would change the 201cif converted 201d value of the cash premium of the total aggregate principle amount of the remaining convertible notes by approximately $ 2.8 million . ( 2 ) other commitments consist of contractual license and royalty payments , and other purchase obligations . ( 3 ) contingent consideration related to business combinations is recorded at fair value and actual results could differ . ( 4 ) other long-term liabilities includes our gross unrecognized tax benefits , as well as executive deferred compensation which are both classified as beyond five years due to the uncertain nature of the commitment . ( 5 ) amounts do not include potential cash payments for the pending acquisition of aati . critical accounting estimates the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements , which have been prepared in accordance with gaap . the preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses , and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities . the sec has defined critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and which require our most difficult , complex or subjective judgments or estimates . based on this definition , we believe our critical accounting policies include the policies of revenue recognition , allowance for doubtful accounts , inventory valuation , business combinations , valuation of long-lived assets , share-based compensation , income taxes , goodwill and intangibles , and loss contingencies . on an ongoing basis , we evaluate the judgments and estimates underlying all of our accounting policies . these estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported , disclosures , and reported amounts of revenues and expenses . these estimates and assumptions are based on our best judgments . we evaluate our estimates and assumptions using historical experience and other factors , including the current economic environment , which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances . we adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate . as future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision , actual results could differ significantly from these estimates . page 80 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what percentage of the total contractual payment obligations do the ones associated with operating lease obligations represent?
| 0.2023 |
CONVFINQA6276 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual cash flows following is a summary of our contractual payment obligations related to our consolidated debt , contingent consideration , operating leases , other commitments and long-term liabilities at september 30 , 2011 ( see notes 9 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements contained this annual report ) , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>obligation</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 26677</td><td>$ 26677</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash premium on convertible notes due march 2012 ( 1 )</td><td>23558</td><td>23558</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other commitments ( 2 )</td><td>5170</td><td>3398</td><td>1772</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating lease obligations</td><td>37788</td><td>8247</td><td>13819</td><td>9780</td><td>5942</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contingent consideration for business combinations ( 3 )</td><td>59400</td><td>58400</td><td>1000</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other long-term liabilities ( 4 )</td><td>34199</td><td>2683</td><td>769</td><td>146</td><td>30601</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 186792</td><td>$ 122963</td><td>$ 17360</td><td>$ 9926</td><td>$ 36543</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) cash premiums related to the 201cif converted 201d value of the 2007 convertible notes that exceed aggregate principal balance using the closing stock price of $ 17.96 on september 30 , 2011 . the actual amount of the cash premium will be calculated based on the 20 day average stock price prior to maturity . a $ 1.00 change in our stock price would change the 201cif converted 201d value of the cash premium of the total aggregate principle amount of the remaining convertible notes by approximately $ 2.8 million . ( 2 ) other commitments consist of contractual license and royalty payments , and other purchase obligations . ( 3 ) contingent consideration related to business combinations is recorded at fair value and actual results could differ . ( 4 ) other long-term liabilities includes our gross unrecognized tax benefits , as well as executive deferred compensation which are both classified as beyond five years due to the uncertain nature of the commitment . ( 5 ) amounts do not include potential cash payments for the pending acquisition of aati . critical accounting estimates the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements , which have been prepared in accordance with gaap . the preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses , and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities . the sec has defined critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and which require our most difficult , complex or subjective judgments or estimates . based on this definition , we believe our critical accounting policies include the policies of revenue recognition , allowance for doubtful accounts , inventory valuation , business combinations , valuation of long-lived assets , share-based compensation , income taxes , goodwill and intangibles , and loss contingencies . on an ongoing basis , we evaluate the judgments and estimates underlying all of our accounting policies . these estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported , disclosures , and reported amounts of revenues and expenses . these estimates and assumptions are based on our best judgments . we evaluate our estimates and assumptions using historical experience and other factors , including the current economic environment , which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances . we adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate . as future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision , actual results could differ significantly from these estimates . page 80 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what percentage of the total contractual payment obligations do the ones associated with operating lease obligations represent?
Answer: 0.2023
Question: and what about the ones due by period less than 1 year?
| 0.65829 |
CONVFINQA6277 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table provides the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>80</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company , and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 147 million and $ 150 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs . as of december 31 , 2018 , the minimum annual future rental commitment under the operating leases for the portion of the facilities funded by the partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitments are $ 4 million in 2019 through 2023 , and $ 59 million thereafter . note 20 : segment information the company 2019s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions and assess performance . the company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment , the regulated businesses segment . the company also operates market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within non-reportable operating segments , collectively referred to as the market-based businesses . the regulated businesses segment is the largest component of the company 2019s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 16 states . the company 2019s primary market-based businesses include the homeowner services group , which provides warranty protection programs to residential and smaller commercial customers ; the military services group , which provides water and wastewater services to the u.s . government on military installations ; and keystone , which provides water transfer services for shale natural gas exploration and production companies. .
Question: what is the total amount of the years 2019 and 2020?
| 32.0 |
CONVFINQA6278 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table provides the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>80</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company , and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 147 million and $ 150 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs . as of december 31 , 2018 , the minimum annual future rental commitment under the operating leases for the portion of the facilities funded by the partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitments are $ 4 million in 2019 through 2023 , and $ 59 million thereafter . note 20 : segment information the company 2019s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions and assess performance . the company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment , the regulated businesses segment . the company also operates market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within non-reportable operating segments , collectively referred to as the market-based businesses . the regulated businesses segment is the largest component of the company 2019s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 16 states . the company 2019s primary market-based businesses include the homeowner services group , which provides warranty protection programs to residential and smaller commercial customers ; the military services group , which provides water and wastewater services to the u.s . government on military installations ; and keystone , which provides water transfer services for shale natural gas exploration and production companies. .
Question: what is the total amount of the years 2019 and 2020?
Answer: 32.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years 2021 and 2022?
| 23.0 |
CONVFINQA6279 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table provides the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>80</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company , and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 147 million and $ 150 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs . as of december 31 , 2018 , the minimum annual future rental commitment under the operating leases for the portion of the facilities funded by the partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitments are $ 4 million in 2019 through 2023 , and $ 59 million thereafter . note 20 : segment information the company 2019s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions and assess performance . the company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment , the regulated businesses segment . the company also operates market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within non-reportable operating segments , collectively referred to as the market-based businesses . the regulated businesses segment is the largest component of the company 2019s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 16 states . the company 2019s primary market-based businesses include the homeowner services group , which provides warranty protection programs to residential and smaller commercial customers ; the military services group , which provides water and wastewater services to the u.s . government on military installations ; and keystone , which provides water transfer services for shale natural gas exploration and production companies. .
Question: what is the total amount of the years 2019 and 2020?
Answer: 32.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years 2021 and 2022?
Answer: 23.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years 2023 and thereafter?
| 86.0 |
CONVFINQA6280 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table provides the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>80</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company , and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 147 million and $ 150 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs . as of december 31 , 2018 , the minimum annual future rental commitment under the operating leases for the portion of the facilities funded by the partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitments are $ 4 million in 2019 through 2023 , and $ 59 million thereafter . note 20 : segment information the company 2019s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions and assess performance . the company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment , the regulated businesses segment . the company also operates market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within non-reportable operating segments , collectively referred to as the market-based businesses . the regulated businesses segment is the largest component of the company 2019s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 16 states . the company 2019s primary market-based businesses include the homeowner services group , which provides warranty protection programs to residential and smaller commercial customers ; the military services group , which provides water and wastewater services to the u.s . government on military installations ; and keystone , which provides water transfer services for shale natural gas exploration and production companies. .
Question: what is the total amount of the years 2019 and 2020?
Answer: 32.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years 2021 and 2022?
Answer: 23.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years 2023 and thereafter?
Answer: 86.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years from 2019 to 2022?
| 55.0 |
CONVFINQA6281 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table provides the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>80</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company , and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 147 million and $ 150 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs . as of december 31 , 2018 , the minimum annual future rental commitment under the operating leases for the portion of the facilities funded by the partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitments are $ 4 million in 2019 through 2023 , and $ 59 million thereafter . note 20 : segment information the company 2019s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions and assess performance . the company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment , the regulated businesses segment . the company also operates market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within non-reportable operating segments , collectively referred to as the market-based businesses . the regulated businesses segment is the largest component of the company 2019s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 16 states . the company 2019s primary market-based businesses include the homeowner services group , which provides warranty protection programs to residential and smaller commercial customers ; the military services group , which provides water and wastewater services to the u.s . government on military installations ; and keystone , which provides water transfer services for shale natural gas exploration and production companies. .
Question: what is the total amount of the years 2019 and 2020?
Answer: 32.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years 2021 and 2022?
Answer: 23.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years 2023 and thereafter?
Answer: 86.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years from 2019 to 2022?
Answer: 55.0
Question: and what is the total amount of the years from 2019 to thereafter?
| 141.0 |
CONVFINQA6282 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
institutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .
Question: what is the net periodic pension expense in 2005?
| 243.0 |
CONVFINQA6283 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
institutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .
Question: what is the net periodic pension expense in 2005?
Answer: 243.0
Question: what about in 2004?
| 111.0 |
CONVFINQA6284 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
institutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .
Question: what is the net periodic pension expense in 2005?
Answer: 243.0
Question: what about in 2004?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 132.0 |
CONVFINQA6285 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
institutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .
Question: what is the net periodic pension expense in 2005?
Answer: 243.0
Question: what about in 2004?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 132.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 1.18919 |
CONVFINQA6286 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
institutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .
Question: what is the net periodic pension expense in 2005?
Answer: 243.0
Question: what about in 2004?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 132.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 1.18919
Question: what about the net change from 2005 to 2006?
| 134.0 |
CONVFINQA6287 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
institutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>506</td><td>474</td><td>467</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-540 ( 540 )</td><td>-556 ( 556 )</td><td>-592 ( 592 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>actuarial loss</td><td>243</td><td>167</td><td>94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of prior service cost</td><td>27</td><td>29</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net periodic pension expense ( a )</td><td>$ 377</td><td>$ 243</td><td>$ 111</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .
Question: what is the net periodic pension expense in 2005?
Answer: 243.0
Question: what about in 2004?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 132.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 1.18919
Question: what about the net change from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 134.0
Question: what percent change does this represent?
| 0.55144 |
CONVFINQA6288 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
supplies . expenses for purchased services increased 10% ( 10 % ) compared to 2012 due to logistics management fees , an increase in locomotive overhauls and repairs on jointly owned property . expenses for contract services increased $ 103 million in 2012 versus 2011 , primarily due to increased demand for transportation services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries for their customers and additional costs for repair and maintenance of locomotives and freight cars . depreciation 2013 the majority of depreciation relates to road property , including rail , ties , ballast , and other track material . depreciation was up 1% ( 1 % ) compared to 2012 . recent depreciation studies allowed us to use longer estimated service lives for certain equipment , which partially offset the impact of a higher depreciable asset base resulting from larger capital spending in recent years . a higher depreciable asset base , reflecting ongoing capital spending , increased depreciation expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . equipment and other rents 2013 equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that the railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies ; freight car , intermodal , and locomotive leases ; and office and other rent expenses . additional container costs resulting from the logistics management arrangement , and increased automotive shipments , partially offset by lower cycle times drove a $ 51 million increase in our short-term freight car rental expense versus 2012 . conversely , lower locomotive and freight car lease expenses partially offset the higher freight car rental expense . increased automotive and intermodal shipments , partially offset by improved car-cycle times , drove an increase in our short-term freight car rental expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . conversely , lower locomotive lease expense partially offset the higher freight car rental expense . other 2013 other expenses include state and local taxes , freight , equipment and property damage , utilities , insurance , personal injury , environmental , employee travel , telephone and cellular , computer software , bad debt , and other general expenses . higher property taxes and costs associated with damaged freight and property increased other costs in 2013 compared to 2012 . continued improvement in our safety performance and lower estimated liability for personal injury , which reduced our personal injury expense year-over-year , partially offset increases in other costs . other costs in 2012 were slightly higher than 2011 primarily due to higher property taxes . despite continual improvement in our safety experience and lower estimated annual costs , personal injury expense increased in 2012 compared to 2011 , as the liability reduction resulting from historical claim experience was less than the reduction in 2011 . non-operating items millions 2013 2012 2011 % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2013 v 2012</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 112</td><td>19 % ( % )</td><td>( 4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-526 ( 526 )</td><td>-535 ( 535 )</td><td>-572 ( 572 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-2660 ( 2660 )</td><td>-2375 ( 2375 )</td><td>-1972 ( 1972 )</td><td>12 % ( % )</td><td>20 % ( % )</td></tr></table> other income 2013 other income increased in 2013 versus 2012 due to higher gains from real estate sales and increased lease income , including the favorable impact from the $ 17 million settlement of a land lease contract . these increases were partially offset by interest received from a tax refund in 2012 . other income decreased in 2012 versus 2011 due to lower gains from real estate sales and higher environmental costs associated with non-operating properties , partially offset by interest received from a tax refund . interest expense 2013 interest expense decreased in 2013 versus 2012 due to a lower effective interest rate of 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2013 versus 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) in 2012 . the increase in the weighted-average debt level to $ 9.6 billion in 2013 from $ 9.1 billion in 2012 partially offset the impact of the lower effective interest rate . interest expense decreased in 2012 versus 2011 reflecting a lower effective interest rate in 2012 of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) versus 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) in 2011 as the debt level did not materially change from 2011 to 2012. .
Question: what was the total in other income for the years of 2013 and 2012, combined?
| 236.0 |
CONVFINQA6289 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
supplies . expenses for purchased services increased 10% ( 10 % ) compared to 2012 due to logistics management fees , an increase in locomotive overhauls and repairs on jointly owned property . expenses for contract services increased $ 103 million in 2012 versus 2011 , primarily due to increased demand for transportation services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries for their customers and additional costs for repair and maintenance of locomotives and freight cars . depreciation 2013 the majority of depreciation relates to road property , including rail , ties , ballast , and other track material . depreciation was up 1% ( 1 % ) compared to 2012 . recent depreciation studies allowed us to use longer estimated service lives for certain equipment , which partially offset the impact of a higher depreciable asset base resulting from larger capital spending in recent years . a higher depreciable asset base , reflecting ongoing capital spending , increased depreciation expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . equipment and other rents 2013 equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that the railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies ; freight car , intermodal , and locomotive leases ; and office and other rent expenses . additional container costs resulting from the logistics management arrangement , and increased automotive shipments , partially offset by lower cycle times drove a $ 51 million increase in our short-term freight car rental expense versus 2012 . conversely , lower locomotive and freight car lease expenses partially offset the higher freight car rental expense . increased automotive and intermodal shipments , partially offset by improved car-cycle times , drove an increase in our short-term freight car rental expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . conversely , lower locomotive lease expense partially offset the higher freight car rental expense . other 2013 other expenses include state and local taxes , freight , equipment and property damage , utilities , insurance , personal injury , environmental , employee travel , telephone and cellular , computer software , bad debt , and other general expenses . higher property taxes and costs associated with damaged freight and property increased other costs in 2013 compared to 2012 . continued improvement in our safety performance and lower estimated liability for personal injury , which reduced our personal injury expense year-over-year , partially offset increases in other costs . other costs in 2012 were slightly higher than 2011 primarily due to higher property taxes . despite continual improvement in our safety experience and lower estimated annual costs , personal injury expense increased in 2012 compared to 2011 , as the liability reduction resulting from historical claim experience was less than the reduction in 2011 . non-operating items millions 2013 2012 2011 % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2013 v 2012</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 112</td><td>19 % ( % )</td><td>( 4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-526 ( 526 )</td><td>-535 ( 535 )</td><td>-572 ( 572 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-2660 ( 2660 )</td><td>-2375 ( 2375 )</td><td>-1972 ( 1972 )</td><td>12 % ( % )</td><td>20 % ( % )</td></tr></table> other income 2013 other income increased in 2013 versus 2012 due to higher gains from real estate sales and increased lease income , including the favorable impact from the $ 17 million settlement of a land lease contract . these increases were partially offset by interest received from a tax refund in 2012 . other income decreased in 2012 versus 2011 due to lower gains from real estate sales and higher environmental costs associated with non-operating properties , partially offset by interest received from a tax refund . interest expense 2013 interest expense decreased in 2013 versus 2012 due to a lower effective interest rate of 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2013 versus 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) in 2012 . the increase in the weighted-average debt level to $ 9.6 billion in 2013 from $ 9.1 billion in 2012 partially offset the impact of the lower effective interest rate . interest expense decreased in 2012 versus 2011 reflecting a lower effective interest rate in 2012 of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) versus 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) in 2011 as the debt level did not materially change from 2011 to 2012. .
Question: what was the total in other income for the years of 2013 and 2012, combined?
Answer: 236.0
Question: including 2011, what then becomes this total?
| 348.0 |
CONVFINQA6290 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
supplies . expenses for purchased services increased 10% ( 10 % ) compared to 2012 due to logistics management fees , an increase in locomotive overhauls and repairs on jointly owned property . expenses for contract services increased $ 103 million in 2012 versus 2011 , primarily due to increased demand for transportation services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries for their customers and additional costs for repair and maintenance of locomotives and freight cars . depreciation 2013 the majority of depreciation relates to road property , including rail , ties , ballast , and other track material . depreciation was up 1% ( 1 % ) compared to 2012 . recent depreciation studies allowed us to use longer estimated service lives for certain equipment , which partially offset the impact of a higher depreciable asset base resulting from larger capital spending in recent years . a higher depreciable asset base , reflecting ongoing capital spending , increased depreciation expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . equipment and other rents 2013 equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that the railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies ; freight car , intermodal , and locomotive leases ; and office and other rent expenses . additional container costs resulting from the logistics management arrangement , and increased automotive shipments , partially offset by lower cycle times drove a $ 51 million increase in our short-term freight car rental expense versus 2012 . conversely , lower locomotive and freight car lease expenses partially offset the higher freight car rental expense . increased automotive and intermodal shipments , partially offset by improved car-cycle times , drove an increase in our short-term freight car rental expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . conversely , lower locomotive lease expense partially offset the higher freight car rental expense . other 2013 other expenses include state and local taxes , freight , equipment and property damage , utilities , insurance , personal injury , environmental , employee travel , telephone and cellular , computer software , bad debt , and other general expenses . higher property taxes and costs associated with damaged freight and property increased other costs in 2013 compared to 2012 . continued improvement in our safety performance and lower estimated liability for personal injury , which reduced our personal injury expense year-over-year , partially offset increases in other costs . other costs in 2012 were slightly higher than 2011 primarily due to higher property taxes . despite continual improvement in our safety experience and lower estimated annual costs , personal injury expense increased in 2012 compared to 2011 , as the liability reduction resulting from historical claim experience was less than the reduction in 2011 . non-operating items millions 2013 2012 2011 % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2013 v 2012</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 112</td><td>19 % ( % )</td><td>( 4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-526 ( 526 )</td><td>-535 ( 535 )</td><td>-572 ( 572 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-2660 ( 2660 )</td><td>-2375 ( 2375 )</td><td>-1972 ( 1972 )</td><td>12 % ( % )</td><td>20 % ( % )</td></tr></table> other income 2013 other income increased in 2013 versus 2012 due to higher gains from real estate sales and increased lease income , including the favorable impact from the $ 17 million settlement of a land lease contract . these increases were partially offset by interest received from a tax refund in 2012 . other income decreased in 2012 versus 2011 due to lower gains from real estate sales and higher environmental costs associated with non-operating properties , partially offset by interest received from a tax refund . interest expense 2013 interest expense decreased in 2013 versus 2012 due to a lower effective interest rate of 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2013 versus 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) in 2012 . the increase in the weighted-average debt level to $ 9.6 billion in 2013 from $ 9.1 billion in 2012 partially offset the impact of the lower effective interest rate . interest expense decreased in 2012 versus 2011 reflecting a lower effective interest rate in 2012 of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) versus 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) in 2011 as the debt level did not materially change from 2011 to 2012. .
Question: what was the total in other income for the years of 2013 and 2012, combined?
Answer: 236.0
Question: including 2011, what then becomes this total?
Answer: 348.0
Question: and what was the average other income between these three years?
| 116.0 |
CONVFINQA6291 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net sales metal beverage packaging, europe between 2008 and 2009?
| -129.2 |
CONVFINQA6292 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net sales metal beverage packaging, europe between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -129.2
Question: what was the 2008 value?
| 1868.7 |
CONVFINQA6293 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net sales metal beverage packaging, europe between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -129.2
Question: what was the 2008 value?
Answer: 1868.7
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.06914 |
CONVFINQA6294 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual obligations in 2011 , we issued $ 1200 million of senior notes and entered into the credit facility with third-party lenders in the amount of $ 1225 million . as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a transition services agreement with northrop grumman , under which northrop grumman or certain of its subsidiaries provides us with certain services to help ensure an orderly transition following the distribution . under the transition services agreement , northrop grumman provides , for up to 12 months following the spin-off , certain enterprise shared services ( including information technology , resource planning , financial , procurement and human resource services ) , benefits support services and other specified services . the original term of the transition services agreement ends on march 31 , 2012 , although we have the right to and have cancelled certain services as we transition to new third-party providers . the services provided by northrop grumman are charged to us at cost , and a limited number of these services may be extended for a period of approximately six months to allow full information systems transition . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a tax matters agreement with northrop grumman ( the 201ctax matters agreement 201d ) that governs the respective rights , responsibilities and obligations of northrop grumman and us after the spin-off with respect to tax liabilities and benefits , tax attributes , tax contests and other tax sharing regarding u.s . federal , state , local and foreign income taxes , other taxes and related tax returns . we have several liabilities with northrop grumman to the irs for the consolidated u.s . federal income taxes of the northrop grumman consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which we were part of that group . however , the tax matters agreement specifies the portion of this tax liability for which we will bear responsibility , and northrop grumman has agreed to indemnify us against any amounts for which we are not responsible . the tax matters agreement also provides special rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the spin-off , together with certain related transactions , is not tax-free . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . we do not expect either the transition services agreement or the tax matters agreement to have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations . the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>total</td><td>2012</td><td>2013 - 2014</td><td>2015 - 2016</td><td>2017 and beyond</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td><td>$ 29</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 1305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>854</td><td>112</td><td>219</td><td>202</td><td>321</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>124</td><td>21</td><td>32</td><td>23</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( 2 )</td><td>2425</td><td>1409</td><td>763</td><td>209</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other long-term liabilities ( 3 )</td><td>587</td><td>66</td><td>96</td><td>67</td><td>358</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 5849</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1239</td><td>$ 897</td><td>$ 2076</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest payments include interest on $ 554 million of variable interest rate debt calculated based on interest rates at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) a 201cpurchase obligation 201d is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . these amounts are primarily comprised of open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors pertaining to funded contracts . ( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities . it excludes obligations for uncertain tax positions of $ 9 million , as the timing of the payments , if any , cannot be reasonably estimated . the above table excludes retirement related contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make minimum and discretionary contributions to our qualified pension plans of approximately $ 153 million and $ 65 million , respectively , exclusive of any u.s . government recoveries . we will continue to periodically evaluate whether to make additional discretionary contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make $ 35 million in contributions for our other postretirement plans , exclusive of any .
Question: what is the total of long term debt?
| 1859.0 |
CONVFINQA6295 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual obligations in 2011 , we issued $ 1200 million of senior notes and entered into the credit facility with third-party lenders in the amount of $ 1225 million . as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a transition services agreement with northrop grumman , under which northrop grumman or certain of its subsidiaries provides us with certain services to help ensure an orderly transition following the distribution . under the transition services agreement , northrop grumman provides , for up to 12 months following the spin-off , certain enterprise shared services ( including information technology , resource planning , financial , procurement and human resource services ) , benefits support services and other specified services . the original term of the transition services agreement ends on march 31 , 2012 , although we have the right to and have cancelled certain services as we transition to new third-party providers . the services provided by northrop grumman are charged to us at cost , and a limited number of these services may be extended for a period of approximately six months to allow full information systems transition . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a tax matters agreement with northrop grumman ( the 201ctax matters agreement 201d ) that governs the respective rights , responsibilities and obligations of northrop grumman and us after the spin-off with respect to tax liabilities and benefits , tax attributes , tax contests and other tax sharing regarding u.s . federal , state , local and foreign income taxes , other taxes and related tax returns . we have several liabilities with northrop grumman to the irs for the consolidated u.s . federal income taxes of the northrop grumman consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which we were part of that group . however , the tax matters agreement specifies the portion of this tax liability for which we will bear responsibility , and northrop grumman has agreed to indemnify us against any amounts for which we are not responsible . the tax matters agreement also provides special rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the spin-off , together with certain related transactions , is not tax-free . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . we do not expect either the transition services agreement or the tax matters agreement to have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations . the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>total</td><td>2012</td><td>2013 - 2014</td><td>2015 - 2016</td><td>2017 and beyond</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td><td>$ 29</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 1305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>854</td><td>112</td><td>219</td><td>202</td><td>321</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>124</td><td>21</td><td>32</td><td>23</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( 2 )</td><td>2425</td><td>1409</td><td>763</td><td>209</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other long-term liabilities ( 3 )</td><td>587</td><td>66</td><td>96</td><td>67</td><td>358</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 5849</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1239</td><td>$ 897</td><td>$ 2076</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest payments include interest on $ 554 million of variable interest rate debt calculated based on interest rates at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) a 201cpurchase obligation 201d is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . these amounts are primarily comprised of open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors pertaining to funded contracts . ( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities . it excludes obligations for uncertain tax positions of $ 9 million , as the timing of the payments , if any , cannot be reasonably estimated . the above table excludes retirement related contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make minimum and discretionary contributions to our qualified pension plans of approximately $ 153 million and $ 65 million , respectively , exclusive of any u.s . government recoveries . we will continue to periodically evaluate whether to make additional discretionary contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make $ 35 million in contributions for our other postretirement plans , exclusive of any .
Question: what is the total of long term debt?
Answer: 1859.0
Question: what is long term debt in 2012?
| 29.0 |
CONVFINQA6296 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual obligations in 2011 , we issued $ 1200 million of senior notes and entered into the credit facility with third-party lenders in the amount of $ 1225 million . as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a transition services agreement with northrop grumman , under which northrop grumman or certain of its subsidiaries provides us with certain services to help ensure an orderly transition following the distribution . under the transition services agreement , northrop grumman provides , for up to 12 months following the spin-off , certain enterprise shared services ( including information technology , resource planning , financial , procurement and human resource services ) , benefits support services and other specified services . the original term of the transition services agreement ends on march 31 , 2012 , although we have the right to and have cancelled certain services as we transition to new third-party providers . the services provided by northrop grumman are charged to us at cost , and a limited number of these services may be extended for a period of approximately six months to allow full information systems transition . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a tax matters agreement with northrop grumman ( the 201ctax matters agreement 201d ) that governs the respective rights , responsibilities and obligations of northrop grumman and us after the spin-off with respect to tax liabilities and benefits , tax attributes , tax contests and other tax sharing regarding u.s . federal , state , local and foreign income taxes , other taxes and related tax returns . we have several liabilities with northrop grumman to the irs for the consolidated u.s . federal income taxes of the northrop grumman consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which we were part of that group . however , the tax matters agreement specifies the portion of this tax liability for which we will bear responsibility , and northrop grumman has agreed to indemnify us against any amounts for which we are not responsible . the tax matters agreement also provides special rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the spin-off , together with certain related transactions , is not tax-free . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . we do not expect either the transition services agreement or the tax matters agreement to have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations . the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>total</td><td>2012</td><td>2013 - 2014</td><td>2015 - 2016</td><td>2017 and beyond</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td><td>$ 29</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 1305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>854</td><td>112</td><td>219</td><td>202</td><td>321</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>124</td><td>21</td><td>32</td><td>23</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( 2 )</td><td>2425</td><td>1409</td><td>763</td><td>209</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other long-term liabilities ( 3 )</td><td>587</td><td>66</td><td>96</td><td>67</td><td>358</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 5849</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1239</td><td>$ 897</td><td>$ 2076</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest payments include interest on $ 554 million of variable interest rate debt calculated based on interest rates at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) a 201cpurchase obligation 201d is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . these amounts are primarily comprised of open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors pertaining to funded contracts . ( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities . it excludes obligations for uncertain tax positions of $ 9 million , as the timing of the payments , if any , cannot be reasonably estimated . the above table excludes retirement related contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make minimum and discretionary contributions to our qualified pension plans of approximately $ 153 million and $ 65 million , respectively , exclusive of any u.s . government recoveries . we will continue to periodically evaluate whether to make additional discretionary contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make $ 35 million in contributions for our other postretirement plans , exclusive of any .
Question: what is the total of long term debt?
Answer: 1859.0
Question: what is long term debt in 2012?
Answer: 29.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| 1830.0 |
CONVFINQA6297 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual obligations in 2011 , we issued $ 1200 million of senior notes and entered into the credit facility with third-party lenders in the amount of $ 1225 million . as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a transition services agreement with northrop grumman , under which northrop grumman or certain of its subsidiaries provides us with certain services to help ensure an orderly transition following the distribution . under the transition services agreement , northrop grumman provides , for up to 12 months following the spin-off , certain enterprise shared services ( including information technology , resource planning , financial , procurement and human resource services ) , benefits support services and other specified services . the original term of the transition services agreement ends on march 31 , 2012 , although we have the right to and have cancelled certain services as we transition to new third-party providers . the services provided by northrop grumman are charged to us at cost , and a limited number of these services may be extended for a period of approximately six months to allow full information systems transition . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a tax matters agreement with northrop grumman ( the 201ctax matters agreement 201d ) that governs the respective rights , responsibilities and obligations of northrop grumman and us after the spin-off with respect to tax liabilities and benefits , tax attributes , tax contests and other tax sharing regarding u.s . federal , state , local and foreign income taxes , other taxes and related tax returns . we have several liabilities with northrop grumman to the irs for the consolidated u.s . federal income taxes of the northrop grumman consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which we were part of that group . however , the tax matters agreement specifies the portion of this tax liability for which we will bear responsibility , and northrop grumman has agreed to indemnify us against any amounts for which we are not responsible . the tax matters agreement also provides special rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the spin-off , together with certain related transactions , is not tax-free . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . we do not expect either the transition services agreement or the tax matters agreement to have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations . the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>total</td><td>2012</td><td>2013 - 2014</td><td>2015 - 2016</td><td>2017 and beyond</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td><td>$ 29</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 1305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>854</td><td>112</td><td>219</td><td>202</td><td>321</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>124</td><td>21</td><td>32</td><td>23</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( 2 )</td><td>2425</td><td>1409</td><td>763</td><td>209</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other long-term liabilities ( 3 )</td><td>587</td><td>66</td><td>96</td><td>67</td><td>358</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 5849</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1239</td><td>$ 897</td><td>$ 2076</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest payments include interest on $ 554 million of variable interest rate debt calculated based on interest rates at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) a 201cpurchase obligation 201d is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . these amounts are primarily comprised of open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors pertaining to funded contracts . ( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities . it excludes obligations for uncertain tax positions of $ 9 million , as the timing of the payments , if any , cannot be reasonably estimated . the above table excludes retirement related contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make minimum and discretionary contributions to our qualified pension plans of approximately $ 153 million and $ 65 million , respectively , exclusive of any u.s . government recoveries . we will continue to periodically evaluate whether to make additional discretionary contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make $ 35 million in contributions for our other postretirement plans , exclusive of any .
Question: what is the total of long term debt?
Answer: 1859.0
Question: what is long term debt in 2012?
Answer: 29.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 1830.0
Question: what is long term debt in 2012?
| 129.0 |
CONVFINQA6298 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contractual obligations in 2011 , we issued $ 1200 million of senior notes and entered into the credit facility with third-party lenders in the amount of $ 1225 million . as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a transition services agreement with northrop grumman , under which northrop grumman or certain of its subsidiaries provides us with certain services to help ensure an orderly transition following the distribution . under the transition services agreement , northrop grumman provides , for up to 12 months following the spin-off , certain enterprise shared services ( including information technology , resource planning , financial , procurement and human resource services ) , benefits support services and other specified services . the original term of the transition services agreement ends on march 31 , 2012 , although we have the right to and have cancelled certain services as we transition to new third-party providers . the services provided by northrop grumman are charged to us at cost , and a limited number of these services may be extended for a period of approximately six months to allow full information systems transition . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a tax matters agreement with northrop grumman ( the 201ctax matters agreement 201d ) that governs the respective rights , responsibilities and obligations of northrop grumman and us after the spin-off with respect to tax liabilities and benefits , tax attributes , tax contests and other tax sharing regarding u.s . federal , state , local and foreign income taxes , other taxes and related tax returns . we have several liabilities with northrop grumman to the irs for the consolidated u.s . federal income taxes of the northrop grumman consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which we were part of that group . however , the tax matters agreement specifies the portion of this tax liability for which we will bear responsibility , and northrop grumman has agreed to indemnify us against any amounts for which we are not responsible . the tax matters agreement also provides special rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the spin-off , together with certain related transactions , is not tax-free . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . we do not expect either the transition services agreement or the tax matters agreement to have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations . the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>total</td><td>2012</td><td>2013 - 2014</td><td>2015 - 2016</td><td>2017 and beyond</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td><td>$ 29</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 1305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>854</td><td>112</td><td>219</td><td>202</td><td>321</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>124</td><td>21</td><td>32</td><td>23</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( 2 )</td><td>2425</td><td>1409</td><td>763</td><td>209</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other long-term liabilities ( 3 )</td><td>587</td><td>66</td><td>96</td><td>67</td><td>358</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 5849</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1239</td><td>$ 897</td><td>$ 2076</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) interest payments include interest on $ 554 million of variable interest rate debt calculated based on interest rates at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) a 201cpurchase obligation 201d is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . these amounts are primarily comprised of open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors pertaining to funded contracts . ( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities . it excludes obligations for uncertain tax positions of $ 9 million , as the timing of the payments , if any , cannot be reasonably estimated . the above table excludes retirement related contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make minimum and discretionary contributions to our qualified pension plans of approximately $ 153 million and $ 65 million , respectively , exclusive of any u.s . government recoveries . we will continue to periodically evaluate whether to make additional discretionary contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make $ 35 million in contributions for our other postretirement plans , exclusive of any .
Question: what is the total of long term debt?
Answer: 1859.0
Question: what is long term debt in 2012?
Answer: 29.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 1830.0
Question: what is long term debt in 2012?
Answer: 129.0
Question: what is 2012 long term debt divided by the net change in value?
| 0.07049 |
CONVFINQA6299 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
apply as it has no impact on plan obligations . for 2015 , the healthcare trend rate was 7% ( 7 % ) , the ultimate trend rate was 5% ( 5 % ) , and the year the ultimate trend rate is reached was 2019 . projected benefit payments are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 11.5</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>11.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>10.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>9.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 20132026</td><td>35.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates . 17 . commitments and contingencies litigation we are involved in various legal proceedings , including commercial , competition , environmental , health , safety , product liability , and insurance matters . in september 2010 , the brazilian administrative council for economic defense ( cade ) issued a decision against our brazilian subsidiary , air products brasil ltda. , and several other brazilian industrial gas companies for alleged anticompetitive activities . cade imposed a civil fine of r$ 179.2 million ( approximately $ 55 at 30 september 2016 ) on air products brasil ltda . this fine was based on a recommendation by a unit of the brazilian ministry of justice , whose investigation began in 2003 , alleging violation of competition laws with respect to the sale of industrial and medical gases . the fines are based on a percentage of our total revenue in brazil in 2003 . we have denied the allegations made by the authorities and filed an appeal in october 2010 with the brazilian courts . on 6 may 2014 , our appeal was granted and the fine against air products brasil ltda . was dismissed . cade has appealed that ruling and the matter remains pending . we , with advice of our outside legal counsel , have assessed the status of this matter and have concluded that , although an adverse final judgment after exhausting all appeals is possible , such a judgment is not probable . as a result , no provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements . we estimate the maximum possible loss to be the full amount of the fine of r$ 179.2 million ( approximately $ 55 at 30 september 2016 ) plus interest accrued thereon until final disposition of the proceedings . other than this matter , we do not currently believe there are any legal proceedings , individually or in the aggregate , that are reasonably possible to have a material impact on our financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows . environmental in the normal course of business , we are involved in legal proceedings under the comprehensive environmental response , compensation , and liability act ( cercla : the federal superfund law ) ; resource conservation and recovery act ( rcra ) ; and similar state and foreign environmental laws relating to the designation of certain sites for investigation or remediation . presently , there are approximately 33 sites on which a final settlement has not been reached where we , along with others , have been designated a potentially responsible party by the environmental protection agency or are otherwise engaged in investigation or remediation , including cleanup activity at certain of our current and former manufacturing sites . we continually monitor these sites for which we have environmental exposure . accruals for environmental loss contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated . the consolidated balance sheets at 30 september 2016 and 2015 included an accrual of $ 81.4 and $ 80.6 , respectively , primarily as part of other noncurrent liabilities . the environmental liabilities will be paid over a period of up to 30 years . we estimate the exposure for environmental loss contingencies to range from $ 81 to a reasonably possible upper exposure of $ 95 as of 30 september 2016. .
Question: how much does projected benefit payments of 2020 represents in relation to that of 2019?
| 0.95327 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.