id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA8900 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what is the net change in total wholesale credit-related assets from 2012 to 2013?
| 2253.0 |
CONVFINQA8901 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what is the net change in total wholesale credit-related assets from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 2253.0
Question: what is the total wholesale credit-related assets in 2012?
| 411814.0 |
CONVFINQA8902 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what is the net change in total wholesale credit-related assets from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 2253.0
Question: what is the total wholesale credit-related assets in 2012?
Answer: 411814.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.00547 |
CONVFINQA8903 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-12.0 ( 12.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-7.4 ( 7.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 959.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
| 959.2 |
CONVFINQA8904 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-12.0 ( 12.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-7.4 ( 7.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 959.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
Answer: 959.2
Question: and in 2007?
| 991.1 |
CONVFINQA8905 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-12.0 ( 12.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-7.4 ( 7.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 959.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
Answer: 959.2
Question: and in 2007?
Answer: 991.1
Question: what was the change in net revenue between the two years?
| -31.9 |
CONVFINQA8906 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-12.0 ( 12.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-7.4 ( 7.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 959.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
Answer: 959.2
Question: and in 2007?
Answer: 991.1
Question: what was the change in net revenue between the two years?
Answer: -31.9
Question: and the growth rate in net revenue in 2008?
| -0.03219 |
CONVFINQA8907 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what is the capital spending amount in 2007?
| 308.5 |
CONVFINQA8908 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what is the capital spending amount in 2007?
Answer: 308.5
Question: what about in 2006?
| 279.6 |
CONVFINQA8909 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what is the capital spending amount in 2007?
Answer: 308.5
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 279.6
Question: what is the difference among these years?
| 28.9 |
CONVFINQA8910 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what is the capital spending amount in 2007?
Answer: 308.5
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 279.6
Question: what is the difference among these years?
Answer: 28.9
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.10336 |
CONVFINQA8911 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this standard eliminated the requirement for a 201cminimum pension liability adjustment 201d that was previously required under sfas no . 87 and required employers to recognize the underfunded or overfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position . in 2006 , as a result of the implementation of sfas no . 158 , the company recognized an after-tax decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $ 1.187 billion and $ 513 million for the u.s . and international pension benefit plans , respectively , and $ 218 million for the postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plan . see note 11 for additional detail . reclassification adjustments are made to avoid double counting in comprehensive income items that are also recorded as part of net income . in 2007 , as disclosed in the net periodic benefit cost table in note 11 , $ 198 million pre-tax ( $ 123 million after-tax ) were reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and postretirement expense in the income statement . these pension and postretirement expense amounts are shown in the table in note 11 as amortization of transition ( asset ) obligation , amortization of prior service cost ( benefit ) and amortization of net actuarial ( gain ) loss . other reclassification adjustments ( except for cash flow hedging instruments adjustments provided in note 12 ) were not material . no tax provision has been made for the translation of foreign currency financial statements into u.s . dollars . note 7 . supplemental cash flow information . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash income tax payments</td><td>$ 1999</td><td>$ 1842</td><td>$ 1277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest payments</td><td>162</td><td>119</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capitalized interest</td><td>25</td><td>16</td><td>12</td></tr></table> individual amounts in the consolidated statement of cash flows exclude the impacts of acquisitions , divestitures and exchange rate impacts , which are presented separately . 201cother 2013 net 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows within operating activities in 2007 and 2006 includes changes in liabilities related to 3m 2019s restructuring actions ( note 4 ) and in 2005 includes the non-cash impact of adopting fin 47 ( $ 35 million cumulative effect of accounting change ) . transactions related to investing and financing activities with significant non-cash components are as follows : in 2007 , 3m purchased certain assets of diamond productions , inc . for approximately 150 thousand shares of 3m common stock , which has a market value of approximately $ 13 million at the acquisition 2019s measurement date . liabilities assumed from acquisitions are provided in the tables in note 2. .
Question: what was the amount reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and post retirement expense pre-tax?
| 198.0 |
CONVFINQA8912 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this standard eliminated the requirement for a 201cminimum pension liability adjustment 201d that was previously required under sfas no . 87 and required employers to recognize the underfunded or overfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position . in 2006 , as a result of the implementation of sfas no . 158 , the company recognized an after-tax decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $ 1.187 billion and $ 513 million for the u.s . and international pension benefit plans , respectively , and $ 218 million for the postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plan . see note 11 for additional detail . reclassification adjustments are made to avoid double counting in comprehensive income items that are also recorded as part of net income . in 2007 , as disclosed in the net periodic benefit cost table in note 11 , $ 198 million pre-tax ( $ 123 million after-tax ) were reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and postretirement expense in the income statement . these pension and postretirement expense amounts are shown in the table in note 11 as amortization of transition ( asset ) obligation , amortization of prior service cost ( benefit ) and amortization of net actuarial ( gain ) loss . other reclassification adjustments ( except for cash flow hedging instruments adjustments provided in note 12 ) were not material . no tax provision has been made for the translation of foreign currency financial statements into u.s . dollars . note 7 . supplemental cash flow information . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash income tax payments</td><td>$ 1999</td><td>$ 1842</td><td>$ 1277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest payments</td><td>162</td><td>119</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capitalized interest</td><td>25</td><td>16</td><td>12</td></tr></table> individual amounts in the consolidated statement of cash flows exclude the impacts of acquisitions , divestitures and exchange rate impacts , which are presented separately . 201cother 2013 net 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows within operating activities in 2007 and 2006 includes changes in liabilities related to 3m 2019s restructuring actions ( note 4 ) and in 2005 includes the non-cash impact of adopting fin 47 ( $ 35 million cumulative effect of accounting change ) . transactions related to investing and financing activities with significant non-cash components are as follows : in 2007 , 3m purchased certain assets of diamond productions , inc . for approximately 150 thousand shares of 3m common stock , which has a market value of approximately $ 13 million at the acquisition 2019s measurement date . liabilities assumed from acquisitions are provided in the tables in note 2. .
Question: what was the amount reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and post retirement expense pre-tax?
Answer: 198.0
Question: and what was it, after-tax?
| 123.0 |
CONVFINQA8913 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this standard eliminated the requirement for a 201cminimum pension liability adjustment 201d that was previously required under sfas no . 87 and required employers to recognize the underfunded or overfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position . in 2006 , as a result of the implementation of sfas no . 158 , the company recognized an after-tax decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $ 1.187 billion and $ 513 million for the u.s . and international pension benefit plans , respectively , and $ 218 million for the postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plan . see note 11 for additional detail . reclassification adjustments are made to avoid double counting in comprehensive income items that are also recorded as part of net income . in 2007 , as disclosed in the net periodic benefit cost table in note 11 , $ 198 million pre-tax ( $ 123 million after-tax ) were reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and postretirement expense in the income statement . these pension and postretirement expense amounts are shown in the table in note 11 as amortization of transition ( asset ) obligation , amortization of prior service cost ( benefit ) and amortization of net actuarial ( gain ) loss . other reclassification adjustments ( except for cash flow hedging instruments adjustments provided in note 12 ) were not material . no tax provision has been made for the translation of foreign currency financial statements into u.s . dollars . note 7 . supplemental cash flow information . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash income tax payments</td><td>$ 1999</td><td>$ 1842</td><td>$ 1277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest payments</td><td>162</td><td>119</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capitalized interest</td><td>25</td><td>16</td><td>12</td></tr></table> individual amounts in the consolidated statement of cash flows exclude the impacts of acquisitions , divestitures and exchange rate impacts , which are presented separately . 201cother 2013 net 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows within operating activities in 2007 and 2006 includes changes in liabilities related to 3m 2019s restructuring actions ( note 4 ) and in 2005 includes the non-cash impact of adopting fin 47 ( $ 35 million cumulative effect of accounting change ) . transactions related to investing and financing activities with significant non-cash components are as follows : in 2007 , 3m purchased certain assets of diamond productions , inc . for approximately 150 thousand shares of 3m common stock , which has a market value of approximately $ 13 million at the acquisition 2019s measurement date . liabilities assumed from acquisitions are provided in the tables in note 2. .
Question: what was the amount reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and post retirement expense pre-tax?
Answer: 198.0
Question: and what was it, after-tax?
Answer: 123.0
Question: what was, then, the change caused by the tax?
| 75.0 |
CONVFINQA8914 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this standard eliminated the requirement for a 201cminimum pension liability adjustment 201d that was previously required under sfas no . 87 and required employers to recognize the underfunded or overfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position . in 2006 , as a result of the implementation of sfas no . 158 , the company recognized an after-tax decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $ 1.187 billion and $ 513 million for the u.s . and international pension benefit plans , respectively , and $ 218 million for the postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plan . see note 11 for additional detail . reclassification adjustments are made to avoid double counting in comprehensive income items that are also recorded as part of net income . in 2007 , as disclosed in the net periodic benefit cost table in note 11 , $ 198 million pre-tax ( $ 123 million after-tax ) were reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and postretirement expense in the income statement . these pension and postretirement expense amounts are shown in the table in note 11 as amortization of transition ( asset ) obligation , amortization of prior service cost ( benefit ) and amortization of net actuarial ( gain ) loss . other reclassification adjustments ( except for cash flow hedging instruments adjustments provided in note 12 ) were not material . no tax provision has been made for the translation of foreign currency financial statements into u.s . dollars . note 7 . supplemental cash flow information . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash income tax payments</td><td>$ 1999</td><td>$ 1842</td><td>$ 1277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest payments</td><td>162</td><td>119</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capitalized interest</td><td>25</td><td>16</td><td>12</td></tr></table> individual amounts in the consolidated statement of cash flows exclude the impacts of acquisitions , divestitures and exchange rate impacts , which are presented separately . 201cother 2013 net 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows within operating activities in 2007 and 2006 includes changes in liabilities related to 3m 2019s restructuring actions ( note 4 ) and in 2005 includes the non-cash impact of adopting fin 47 ( $ 35 million cumulative effect of accounting change ) . transactions related to investing and financing activities with significant non-cash components are as follows : in 2007 , 3m purchased certain assets of diamond productions , inc . for approximately 150 thousand shares of 3m common stock , which has a market value of approximately $ 13 million at the acquisition 2019s measurement date . liabilities assumed from acquisitions are provided in the tables in note 2. .
Question: what was the amount reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and post retirement expense pre-tax?
Answer: 198.0
Question: and what was it, after-tax?
Answer: 123.0
Question: what was, then, the change caused by the tax?
Answer: 75.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that after-tax amount?
| 0.60976 |
CONVFINQA8915 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger . on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hum</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 162</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 195</td><td>$ 274</td><td>$ 343</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 226</td><td>$ 239</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2011 to 2012?
| 0.79012 |
CONVFINQA8916 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger . on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hum</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 162</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 195</td><td>$ 274</td><td>$ 343</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 226</td><td>$ 239</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.79012
Question: and how much did this change represent, in percentage, in relation to that price performance in 2011?
| 0.00488 |
CONVFINQA8917 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger . on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hum</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 162</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 195</td><td>$ 274</td><td>$ 343</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 226</td><td>$ 239</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.79012
Question: and how much did this change represent, in percentage, in relation to that price performance in 2011?
Answer: 0.00488
Question: and considering only the first year of the investment for all the stocks shown in the chart, what was the biggest price performance in 2011?
| 162.0 |
CONVFINQA8918 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger . on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hum</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 162</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 195</td><td>$ 274</td><td>$ 343</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 226</td><td>$ 239</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.79012
Question: and how much did this change represent, in percentage, in relation to that price performance in 2011?
Answer: 0.00488
Question: and considering only the first year of the investment for all the stocks shown in the chart, what was the biggest price performance in 2011?
Answer: 162.0
Question: what was the change in that performance since 2010?
| 62.0 |
CONVFINQA8919 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy wholesale commodities during 2010 entergy integrated its non-utility nuclear and its non-nuclear wholesale assets businesses into a new organization called entergy wholesale commodities . entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants , five of which are located in the northeast united states , with the sixth located in michigan , and is primarily focused on selling electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers . entergy wholesale commodities 2019 revenues are primarily derived from sales of energy and generation capacity from these plants . entergy wholesale commodities also provides operations and management services , including decommissioning services , to nuclear power plants owned by other utilities in the united states . entergy wholesale commodities also includes the ownership of , or participation in joint ventures that own , non-nuclear power plants and the sale to wholesale customers of the electric power produced by these plants . property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service acquired location capacity- reactor type license expiration . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>power plant</td><td>market</td><td>inserviceyear</td><td>acquired</td><td>location</td><td>capacity-reactor type</td><td>licenseexpirationdate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pilgrim</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 1999</td><td>plymouth ma</td><td>688 mw - boiling water</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1975</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>oswego ny</td><td>838 mw - boiling water</td><td>2034</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>indian point 3</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1976</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1041 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indian point 2</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1974</td><td>sept . 2001</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1028 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vermont yankee</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 2002</td><td>vernon vt</td><td>605 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>palisades</td><td>miso</td><td>1971</td><td>apr . 2007</td><td>south haven mi</td><td>811 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2031</td></tr></table> entergy wholesale commodities also includes the ownership of two non-operating nuclear facilities , big rock point in michigan and indian point 1 in new york that were acquired when entergy purchased the palisades and indian point 2 nuclear plants , respectively . these facilities are in various stages of the decommissioning process . the nrc operating license for vermont yankee was to expire in march 2012 . in march 2011 the nrc renewed vermont yankee 2019s operating license for an additional 20 years , as a result of which the license now expires in 2032 . for additional discussion regarding the continued operation of the vermont yankee plant , see 201cimpairment of long-lived assets 201d in note 1 to the financial statements . the operating licenses for pilgrim , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 expire between 2012 and 2015 . under federal law , nuclear power plants may continue to operate beyond their license expiration dates while their renewal applications are pending nrc approval . various parties have expressed opposition to renewal of the licenses . with respect to the pilgrim license renewal , the atomic safety and licensing board ( aslb ) of the nrc , after issuing an order denying a new hearing request , terminated its proceeding on pilgrim 2019s license renewal application . with the aslb process concluded the proceeding , including appeals of certain aslb decisions , is now before the nrc . in april 2007 , entergy submitted an application to the nrc to renew the operating licenses for indian point 2 and 3 for an additional 20 years . the aslb has admitted 21 contentions raised by the state of new york or other parties , which were combined into 16 discrete issues . two of the issues have been resolved , leaving 14 issues that are currently subject to aslb hearings . in july 2011 , the aslb granted the state of new york 2019s motion for summary disposition of an admitted contention challenging the adequacy of a section of indian point 2019s environmental analysis as incorporated in the fseis ( discussed below ) . that section provided cost estimates for severe accident mitigation alternatives ( samas ) , which are hardware and procedural changes that could be .
Question: of how many years is the period of the lease for pilgrim?
| 13.0 |
CONVFINQA8920 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy wholesale commodities during 2010 entergy integrated its non-utility nuclear and its non-nuclear wholesale assets businesses into a new organization called entergy wholesale commodities . entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants , five of which are located in the northeast united states , with the sixth located in michigan , and is primarily focused on selling electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers . entergy wholesale commodities 2019 revenues are primarily derived from sales of energy and generation capacity from these plants . entergy wholesale commodities also provides operations and management services , including decommissioning services , to nuclear power plants owned by other utilities in the united states . entergy wholesale commodities also includes the ownership of , or participation in joint ventures that own , non-nuclear power plants and the sale to wholesale customers of the electric power produced by these plants . property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service acquired location capacity- reactor type license expiration . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>power plant</td><td>market</td><td>inserviceyear</td><td>acquired</td><td>location</td><td>capacity-reactor type</td><td>licenseexpirationdate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pilgrim</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 1999</td><td>plymouth ma</td><td>688 mw - boiling water</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1975</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>oswego ny</td><td>838 mw - boiling water</td><td>2034</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>indian point 3</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1976</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1041 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indian point 2</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1974</td><td>sept . 2001</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1028 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vermont yankee</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 2002</td><td>vernon vt</td><td>605 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>palisades</td><td>miso</td><td>1971</td><td>apr . 2007</td><td>south haven mi</td><td>811 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2031</td></tr></table> entergy wholesale commodities also includes the ownership of two non-operating nuclear facilities , big rock point in michigan and indian point 1 in new york that were acquired when entergy purchased the palisades and indian point 2 nuclear plants , respectively . these facilities are in various stages of the decommissioning process . the nrc operating license for vermont yankee was to expire in march 2012 . in march 2011 the nrc renewed vermont yankee 2019s operating license for an additional 20 years , as a result of which the license now expires in 2032 . for additional discussion regarding the continued operation of the vermont yankee plant , see 201cimpairment of long-lived assets 201d in note 1 to the financial statements . the operating licenses for pilgrim , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 expire between 2012 and 2015 . under federal law , nuclear power plants may continue to operate beyond their license expiration dates while their renewal applications are pending nrc approval . various parties have expressed opposition to renewal of the licenses . with respect to the pilgrim license renewal , the atomic safety and licensing board ( aslb ) of the nrc , after issuing an order denying a new hearing request , terminated its proceeding on pilgrim 2019s license renewal application . with the aslb process concluded the proceeding , including appeals of certain aslb decisions , is now before the nrc . in april 2007 , entergy submitted an application to the nrc to renew the operating licenses for indian point 2 and 3 for an additional 20 years . the aslb has admitted 21 contentions raised by the state of new york or other parties , which were combined into 16 discrete issues . two of the issues have been resolved , leaving 14 issues that are currently subject to aslb hearings . in july 2011 , the aslb granted the state of new york 2019s motion for summary disposition of an admitted contention challenging the adequacy of a section of indian point 2019s environmental analysis as incorporated in the fseis ( discussed below ) . that section provided cost estimates for severe accident mitigation alternatives ( samas ) , which are hardware and procedural changes that could be .
Question: of how many years is the period of the lease for pilgrim?
Answer: 13.0
Question: and of how many years is the one for fitzpatrick?
| 34.0 |
CONVFINQA8921 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what was the total of net earnings in 2015?
| 3534.0 |
CONVFINQA8922 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what was the total of net earnings in 2015?
Answer: 3534.0
Question: and what was it in 2014?
| 3475.0 |
CONVFINQA8923 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what was the total of net earnings in 2015?
Answer: 3534.0
Question: and what was it in 2014?
Answer: 3475.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 59.0 |
CONVFINQA8924 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these .
Question: what was the total of net earnings in 2015?
Answer: 3534.0
Question: and what was it in 2014?
Answer: 3475.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 59.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the net earnings in 2014, in percentage?
| 0.01698 |
CONVFINQA8925 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 193101</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>605762</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>282138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>303191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>527221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1436263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>3347676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized fair value adjustment</td><td>19669</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-6846 ( 6846 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 3360499</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of maturities in 2009?
| 605762.0 |
CONVFINQA8926 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 193101</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>605762</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>282138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>303191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>527221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1436263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>3347676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized fair value adjustment</td><td>19669</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-6846 ( 6846 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 3360499</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of maturities in 2009?
Answer: 605762.0
Question: what was the value of maturities in 2008?
| 193101.0 |
CONVFINQA8927 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 193101</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>605762</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>282138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>303191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>527221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1436263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>3347676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized fair value adjustment</td><td>19669</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-6846 ( 6846 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 3360499</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of maturities in 2009?
Answer: 605762.0
Question: what was the value of maturities in 2008?
Answer: 193101.0
Question: what is the net change in maturities?
| 412661.0 |
CONVFINQA8928 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 193101</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>605762</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>282138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>303191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>527221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1436263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>3347676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized fair value adjustment</td><td>19669</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-6846 ( 6846 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 3360499</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of maturities in 2009?
Answer: 605762.0
Question: what was the value of maturities in 2008?
Answer: 193101.0
Question: what is the net change in maturities?
Answer: 412661.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 2.13702 |
CONVFINQA8929 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. .
Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of december 2006?
| 16.0 |
CONVFINQA8930 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. .
Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of december 2006?
Answer: 16.0
Question: and what was it in january of that same year?
| 2.0 |
CONVFINQA8931 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. .
Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of december 2006?
Answer: 16.0
Question: and what was it in january of that same year?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 14.0 |
CONVFINQA8932 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. .
Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of december 2006?
Answer: 16.0
Question: and what was it in january of that same year?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of january 2006?
| 2.0 |
CONVFINQA8933 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. .
Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of december 2006?
Answer: 16.0
Question: and what was it in january of that same year?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of january 2006?
Answer: 2.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to this january equity derivative, in percentage?
| 7.0 |
CONVFINQA8934 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
vornado realty trust 77 cash flows the company expects to contribute $ 959000 to the plans in 2004 . 11 . leases as lessor : the company leases space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse the company for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2003 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 1084934</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>968162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>846345</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>770228</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>608267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>3423083</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 3662000 , $ 1832000 , and $ 2157000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 . except for the u.s . government , which accounted for 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) of the company 2019s revenue , none of the company 2019s tenants represented more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . former bradlees locations property rentals for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , include $ 5000000 of additional rent which , effective december 31 , 2002 , was re-allocated to the former bradlees locations in marlton , turnersville , bensalem and broomall and is payable by stop & shop , pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 . this amount is in addition to all other rent guaranteed by stop & shop for the former bradlees locations . on january 8 , 2003 , stop & shop filed a complaint with the united states district court claiming the company has no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop because of the expiration of the east brunswick , jersey city , middletown , union and woodbridge leases to which the $ 5000000 of additional rent was previously allocated . the company believes the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and will vigorously oppose stop & shop 2019s complaint . in february 2003 , koninklijke ahold nv , parent of stop & shop , announced that it overstated its 2002 and 2001 earnings by at least $ 500 million and is under investigation by the u.s . justice department and securities and exchange commission . the company cannot predict what effect , if any , this situation may have on stop & shop 2019s ability to satisfy its obligation under the bradlees guarantees and rent for existing stop & shop leases aggregating approximately $ 10.5 million per annum . notes to consolidated financial statements sr-176_fin_l02p53_82v1.qxd 4/8/04 2:42 pm page 77 .
Question: what was the percentage rent in 2002, in thousands?
| 1832000.0 |
CONVFINQA8935 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
vornado realty trust 77 cash flows the company expects to contribute $ 959000 to the plans in 2004 . 11 . leases as lessor : the company leases space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse the company for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2003 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 1084934</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>968162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>846345</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>770228</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>608267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>3423083</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 3662000 , $ 1832000 , and $ 2157000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 . except for the u.s . government , which accounted for 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) of the company 2019s revenue , none of the company 2019s tenants represented more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . former bradlees locations property rentals for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , include $ 5000000 of additional rent which , effective december 31 , 2002 , was re-allocated to the former bradlees locations in marlton , turnersville , bensalem and broomall and is payable by stop & shop , pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 . this amount is in addition to all other rent guaranteed by stop & shop for the former bradlees locations . on january 8 , 2003 , stop & shop filed a complaint with the united states district court claiming the company has no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop because of the expiration of the east brunswick , jersey city , middletown , union and woodbridge leases to which the $ 5000000 of additional rent was previously allocated . the company believes the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and will vigorously oppose stop & shop 2019s complaint . in february 2003 , koninklijke ahold nv , parent of stop & shop , announced that it overstated its 2002 and 2001 earnings by at least $ 500 million and is under investigation by the u.s . justice department and securities and exchange commission . the company cannot predict what effect , if any , this situation may have on stop & shop 2019s ability to satisfy its obligation under the bradlees guarantees and rent for existing stop & shop leases aggregating approximately $ 10.5 million per annum . notes to consolidated financial statements sr-176_fin_l02p53_82v1.qxd 4/8/04 2:42 pm page 77 .
Question: what was the percentage rent in 2002, in thousands?
Answer: 1832000.0
Question: and what was it in 2001?
| 2157000.0 |
CONVFINQA8936 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
vornado realty trust 77 cash flows the company expects to contribute $ 959000 to the plans in 2004 . 11 . leases as lessor : the company leases space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse the company for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2003 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 1084934</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>968162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>846345</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>770228</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>608267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>3423083</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 3662000 , $ 1832000 , and $ 2157000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 . except for the u.s . government , which accounted for 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) of the company 2019s revenue , none of the company 2019s tenants represented more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . former bradlees locations property rentals for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , include $ 5000000 of additional rent which , effective december 31 , 2002 , was re-allocated to the former bradlees locations in marlton , turnersville , bensalem and broomall and is payable by stop & shop , pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 . this amount is in addition to all other rent guaranteed by stop & shop for the former bradlees locations . on january 8 , 2003 , stop & shop filed a complaint with the united states district court claiming the company has no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop because of the expiration of the east brunswick , jersey city , middletown , union and woodbridge leases to which the $ 5000000 of additional rent was previously allocated . the company believes the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and will vigorously oppose stop & shop 2019s complaint . in february 2003 , koninklijke ahold nv , parent of stop & shop , announced that it overstated its 2002 and 2001 earnings by at least $ 500 million and is under investigation by the u.s . justice department and securities and exchange commission . the company cannot predict what effect , if any , this situation may have on stop & shop 2019s ability to satisfy its obligation under the bradlees guarantees and rent for existing stop & shop leases aggregating approximately $ 10.5 million per annum . notes to consolidated financial statements sr-176_fin_l02p53_82v1.qxd 4/8/04 2:42 pm page 77 .
Question: what was the percentage rent in 2002, in thousands?
Answer: 1832000.0
Question: and what was it in 2001?
Answer: 2157000.0
Question: what was, then, the total percentage rent in both years combined, in thousands?
| 3989000.0 |
CONVFINQA8937 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
vornado realty trust 77 cash flows the company expects to contribute $ 959000 to the plans in 2004 . 11 . leases as lessor : the company leases space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . shopping center leases provide for the pass-through to tenants of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse the company for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2003 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 1084934</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>968162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>846345</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>770228</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>608267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>3423083</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 3662000 , $ 1832000 , and $ 2157000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 . except for the u.s . government , which accounted for 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) of the company 2019s revenue , none of the company 2019s tenants represented more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . former bradlees locations property rentals for the year ended december 31 , 2003 , include $ 5000000 of additional rent which , effective december 31 , 2002 , was re-allocated to the former bradlees locations in marlton , turnersville , bensalem and broomall and is payable by stop & shop , pursuant to the master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 . this amount is in addition to all other rent guaranteed by stop & shop for the former bradlees locations . on january 8 , 2003 , stop & shop filed a complaint with the united states district court claiming the company has no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop because of the expiration of the east brunswick , jersey city , middletown , union and woodbridge leases to which the $ 5000000 of additional rent was previously allocated . the company believes the additional rent provision of the guaranty expires at the earliest in 2012 and will vigorously oppose stop & shop 2019s complaint . in february 2003 , koninklijke ahold nv , parent of stop & shop , announced that it overstated its 2002 and 2001 earnings by at least $ 500 million and is under investigation by the u.s . justice department and securities and exchange commission . the company cannot predict what effect , if any , this situation may have on stop & shop 2019s ability to satisfy its obligation under the bradlees guarantees and rent for existing stop & shop leases aggregating approximately $ 10.5 million per annum . notes to consolidated financial statements sr-176_fin_l02p53_82v1.qxd 4/8/04 2:42 pm page 77 .
Question: what was the percentage rent in 2002, in thousands?
Answer: 1832000.0
Question: and what was it in 2001?
Answer: 2157000.0
Question: what was, then, the total percentage rent in both years combined, in thousands?
Answer: 3989000.0
Question: and in the subsequent year of 2002, what was the total of future noncancelable minimum rent amounts for 2004 and 2005, also in thousands?
| 2053096.0 |
CONVFINQA8938 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .
Question: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA8939 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .
Question: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.0708 |
CONVFINQA8940 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .
Question: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.0708
Question: what is the net outflows in 2016?
| 332.5 |
CONVFINQA8941 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .
Question: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.0708
Question: what is the net outflows in 2016?
Answer: 332.5
Question: what about in 2015?
| 344.4 |
CONVFINQA8942 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .
Question: what is the net change in the lcr from 2014 to 2016?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.0708
Question: what is the net outflows in 2016?
Answer: 332.5
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 344.4
Question: what is the net change in net outflows?
| -11.9 |
CONVFINQA8943 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net value change in the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance between 2017 and 2018?
| 17.0 |
CONVFINQA8944 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net value change in the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 17.0
Question: what was the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance in 2017?
| 213.2 |
CONVFINQA8945 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net value change in the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 17.0
Question: what was the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance in 2017?
Answer: 213.2
Question: what was the net value change in the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance between 2017 and 2018 divided by 213.2?
| 0.07974 |
CONVFINQA8946 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net value change in the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 17.0
Question: what was the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance in 2017?
Answer: 213.2
Question: what was the net value change in the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance between 2017 and 2018 divided by 213.2?
Answer: 0.07974
Question: what is that value time 100?
| 7.97373 |
CONVFINQA8947 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: what was the weighted average useful life for purchased technology, in years?
| 6.0 |
CONVFINQA8948 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: what was the weighted average useful life for purchased technology, in years?
Answer: 6.0
Question: and what was it for customer contracts and relationships, also in years?
| 9.0 |
CONVFINQA8949 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: what was the weighted average useful life for purchased technology, in years?
Answer: 6.0
Question: and what was it for customer contracts and relationships, also in years?
Answer: 9.0
Question: what was, then, the total of years in weighted average useful life for both of those intangible assets?
| 15.0 |
CONVFINQA8950 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: what was the weighted average useful life for purchased technology, in years?
Answer: 6.0
Question: and what was it for customer contracts and relationships, also in years?
Answer: 9.0
Question: what was, then, the total of years in weighted average useful life for both of those intangible assets?
Answer: 15.0
Question: and what is the average between them?
| 7.5 |
CONVFINQA8951 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
year ended december 31 , 2010 compared to year ended december 31 , 2009 net revenues increased $ 207.5 million , or 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , to $ 1063.9 million in 2010 from $ 856.4 million in 2009 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 853493</td><td>$ 651779</td><td>$ 201714</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>127175</td><td>136224</td><td>-9049 ( 9049 )</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>43882</td><td>35077</td><td>8805</td><td>25.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>1024550</td><td>823080</td><td>201470</td><td>24.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license revenues</td><td>39377</td><td>33331</td><td>6046</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 856411</td><td>$ 207516</td><td>24.2% ( 24.2 % )</td></tr></table> net sales increased $ 201.5 million , or 24.5% ( 24.5 % ) , to $ 1024.6 million in 2010 from $ 823.1 million in 2009 as noted in the table above . the increase in net sales primarily reflects : 2022 $ 88.9 million , or 56.8% ( 56.8 % ) , increase in direct to consumer sales , which includes 19 additional stores in 2010 ; and 2022 unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories , most significantly in our training , base layer , mountain , golf and underwear categories ; partially offset by 2022 $ 9.0 million decrease in footwear sales driven primarily by a decline in running and training footwear sales . license revenues increased $ 6.1 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 39.4 million in 2010 from $ 33.3 million in 2009 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased sales by our licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth . we have developed our own headwear and bags , and beginning in 2011 , these products are being sold by us rather than by one of our licensees . gross profit increased $ 120.4 million to $ 530.5 million in 2010 from $ 410.1 million in 2009 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 200 basis points to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) in 2010 compared to 47.9% ( 47.9 % ) in 2009 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 100 basis point increase driven by increased direct to consumer higher margin sales ; 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven by decreased sales markdowns and returns , primarily due to improved sell-through rates at retail ; and 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven primarily by liquidation sales and related inventory reserve reversals . the current year period benefited from reversals of inventory reserves established in the prior year relative to certain cleated footwear , sport specific apparel and gloves . these products have historically been more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 93.3 million to $ 418.2 million in 2010 from $ 324.9 million in 2009 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses increased to 39.3% ( 39.3 % ) in 2010 from 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) in 2009 . these changes were primarily attributable to the following : 2022 marketing costs increased $ 19.3 million to $ 128.2 million in 2010 from $ 108.9 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in sponsorship of events and collegiate and professional teams and athletes , increased television and digital campaign costs , including media campaigns for specific customers and additional personnel costs . in addition , we incurred increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 12.0% ( 12.0 % ) in 2010 from 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to decreased marketing costs for specific customers. .
Question: what was the gross profit in 2010?
| 530.5 |
CONVFINQA8952 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
year ended december 31 , 2010 compared to year ended december 31 , 2009 net revenues increased $ 207.5 million , or 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , to $ 1063.9 million in 2010 from $ 856.4 million in 2009 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 853493</td><td>$ 651779</td><td>$ 201714</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>127175</td><td>136224</td><td>-9049 ( 9049 )</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>43882</td><td>35077</td><td>8805</td><td>25.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>1024550</td><td>823080</td><td>201470</td><td>24.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license revenues</td><td>39377</td><td>33331</td><td>6046</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 856411</td><td>$ 207516</td><td>24.2% ( 24.2 % )</td></tr></table> net sales increased $ 201.5 million , or 24.5% ( 24.5 % ) , to $ 1024.6 million in 2010 from $ 823.1 million in 2009 as noted in the table above . the increase in net sales primarily reflects : 2022 $ 88.9 million , or 56.8% ( 56.8 % ) , increase in direct to consumer sales , which includes 19 additional stores in 2010 ; and 2022 unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories , most significantly in our training , base layer , mountain , golf and underwear categories ; partially offset by 2022 $ 9.0 million decrease in footwear sales driven primarily by a decline in running and training footwear sales . license revenues increased $ 6.1 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 39.4 million in 2010 from $ 33.3 million in 2009 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased sales by our licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth . we have developed our own headwear and bags , and beginning in 2011 , these products are being sold by us rather than by one of our licensees . gross profit increased $ 120.4 million to $ 530.5 million in 2010 from $ 410.1 million in 2009 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 200 basis points to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) in 2010 compared to 47.9% ( 47.9 % ) in 2009 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 100 basis point increase driven by increased direct to consumer higher margin sales ; 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven by decreased sales markdowns and returns , primarily due to improved sell-through rates at retail ; and 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven primarily by liquidation sales and related inventory reserve reversals . the current year period benefited from reversals of inventory reserves established in the prior year relative to certain cleated footwear , sport specific apparel and gloves . these products have historically been more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 93.3 million to $ 418.2 million in 2010 from $ 324.9 million in 2009 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses increased to 39.3% ( 39.3 % ) in 2010 from 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) in 2009 . these changes were primarily attributable to the following : 2022 marketing costs increased $ 19.3 million to $ 128.2 million in 2010 from $ 108.9 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in sponsorship of events and collegiate and professional teams and athletes , increased television and digital campaign costs , including media campaigns for specific customers and additional personnel costs . in addition , we incurred increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 12.0% ( 12.0 % ) in 2010 from 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to decreased marketing costs for specific customers. .
Question: what was the gross profit in 2010?
Answer: 530.5
Question: and what was it in 2009?
| 120.4 |
CONVFINQA8953 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
year ended december 31 , 2010 compared to year ended december 31 , 2009 net revenues increased $ 207.5 million , or 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , to $ 1063.9 million in 2010 from $ 856.4 million in 2009 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 853493</td><td>$ 651779</td><td>$ 201714</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>127175</td><td>136224</td><td>-9049 ( 9049 )</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>43882</td><td>35077</td><td>8805</td><td>25.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>1024550</td><td>823080</td><td>201470</td><td>24.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license revenues</td><td>39377</td><td>33331</td><td>6046</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 856411</td><td>$ 207516</td><td>24.2% ( 24.2 % )</td></tr></table> net sales increased $ 201.5 million , or 24.5% ( 24.5 % ) , to $ 1024.6 million in 2010 from $ 823.1 million in 2009 as noted in the table above . the increase in net sales primarily reflects : 2022 $ 88.9 million , or 56.8% ( 56.8 % ) , increase in direct to consumer sales , which includes 19 additional stores in 2010 ; and 2022 unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories , most significantly in our training , base layer , mountain , golf and underwear categories ; partially offset by 2022 $ 9.0 million decrease in footwear sales driven primarily by a decline in running and training footwear sales . license revenues increased $ 6.1 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 39.4 million in 2010 from $ 33.3 million in 2009 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased sales by our licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth . we have developed our own headwear and bags , and beginning in 2011 , these products are being sold by us rather than by one of our licensees . gross profit increased $ 120.4 million to $ 530.5 million in 2010 from $ 410.1 million in 2009 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 200 basis points to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) in 2010 compared to 47.9% ( 47.9 % ) in 2009 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 100 basis point increase driven by increased direct to consumer higher margin sales ; 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven by decreased sales markdowns and returns , primarily due to improved sell-through rates at retail ; and 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven primarily by liquidation sales and related inventory reserve reversals . the current year period benefited from reversals of inventory reserves established in the prior year relative to certain cleated footwear , sport specific apparel and gloves . these products have historically been more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 93.3 million to $ 418.2 million in 2010 from $ 324.9 million in 2009 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses increased to 39.3% ( 39.3 % ) in 2010 from 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) in 2009 . these changes were primarily attributable to the following : 2022 marketing costs increased $ 19.3 million to $ 128.2 million in 2010 from $ 108.9 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in sponsorship of events and collegiate and professional teams and athletes , increased television and digital campaign costs , including media campaigns for specific customers and additional personnel costs . in addition , we incurred increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 12.0% ( 12.0 % ) in 2010 from 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to decreased marketing costs for specific customers. .
Question: what was the gross profit in 2010?
Answer: 530.5
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 120.4
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 410.1 |
CONVFINQA8954 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
year ended december 31 , 2010 compared to year ended december 31 , 2009 net revenues increased $ 207.5 million , or 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , to $ 1063.9 million in 2010 from $ 856.4 million in 2009 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 853493</td><td>$ 651779</td><td>$ 201714</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>127175</td><td>136224</td><td>-9049 ( 9049 )</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>43882</td><td>35077</td><td>8805</td><td>25.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>1024550</td><td>823080</td><td>201470</td><td>24.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license revenues</td><td>39377</td><td>33331</td><td>6046</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 856411</td><td>$ 207516</td><td>24.2% ( 24.2 % )</td></tr></table> net sales increased $ 201.5 million , or 24.5% ( 24.5 % ) , to $ 1024.6 million in 2010 from $ 823.1 million in 2009 as noted in the table above . the increase in net sales primarily reflects : 2022 $ 88.9 million , or 56.8% ( 56.8 % ) , increase in direct to consumer sales , which includes 19 additional stores in 2010 ; and 2022 unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories , most significantly in our training , base layer , mountain , golf and underwear categories ; partially offset by 2022 $ 9.0 million decrease in footwear sales driven primarily by a decline in running and training footwear sales . license revenues increased $ 6.1 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 39.4 million in 2010 from $ 33.3 million in 2009 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased sales by our licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth . we have developed our own headwear and bags , and beginning in 2011 , these products are being sold by us rather than by one of our licensees . gross profit increased $ 120.4 million to $ 530.5 million in 2010 from $ 410.1 million in 2009 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 200 basis points to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) in 2010 compared to 47.9% ( 47.9 % ) in 2009 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 100 basis point increase driven by increased direct to consumer higher margin sales ; 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven by decreased sales markdowns and returns , primarily due to improved sell-through rates at retail ; and 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven primarily by liquidation sales and related inventory reserve reversals . the current year period benefited from reversals of inventory reserves established in the prior year relative to certain cleated footwear , sport specific apparel and gloves . these products have historically been more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 93.3 million to $ 418.2 million in 2010 from $ 324.9 million in 2009 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses increased to 39.3% ( 39.3 % ) in 2010 from 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) in 2009 . these changes were primarily attributable to the following : 2022 marketing costs increased $ 19.3 million to $ 128.2 million in 2010 from $ 108.9 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in sponsorship of events and collegiate and professional teams and athletes , increased television and digital campaign costs , including media campaigns for specific customers and additional personnel costs . in addition , we incurred increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 12.0% ( 12.0 % ) in 2010 from 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to decreased marketing costs for specific customers. .
Question: what was the gross profit in 2010?
Answer: 530.5
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 120.4
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 410.1
Question: what was the gross profit in 2009?
| 120.4 |
CONVFINQA8955 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
year ended december 31 , 2010 compared to year ended december 31 , 2009 net revenues increased $ 207.5 million , or 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , to $ 1063.9 million in 2010 from $ 856.4 million in 2009 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 853493</td><td>$ 651779</td><td>$ 201714</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>127175</td><td>136224</td><td>-9049 ( 9049 )</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>43882</td><td>35077</td><td>8805</td><td>25.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>1024550</td><td>823080</td><td>201470</td><td>24.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license revenues</td><td>39377</td><td>33331</td><td>6046</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 856411</td><td>$ 207516</td><td>24.2% ( 24.2 % )</td></tr></table> net sales increased $ 201.5 million , or 24.5% ( 24.5 % ) , to $ 1024.6 million in 2010 from $ 823.1 million in 2009 as noted in the table above . the increase in net sales primarily reflects : 2022 $ 88.9 million , or 56.8% ( 56.8 % ) , increase in direct to consumer sales , which includes 19 additional stores in 2010 ; and 2022 unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories , most significantly in our training , base layer , mountain , golf and underwear categories ; partially offset by 2022 $ 9.0 million decrease in footwear sales driven primarily by a decline in running and training footwear sales . license revenues increased $ 6.1 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 39.4 million in 2010 from $ 33.3 million in 2009 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased sales by our licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth . we have developed our own headwear and bags , and beginning in 2011 , these products are being sold by us rather than by one of our licensees . gross profit increased $ 120.4 million to $ 530.5 million in 2010 from $ 410.1 million in 2009 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 200 basis points to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) in 2010 compared to 47.9% ( 47.9 % ) in 2009 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 100 basis point increase driven by increased direct to consumer higher margin sales ; 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven by decreased sales markdowns and returns , primarily due to improved sell-through rates at retail ; and 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven primarily by liquidation sales and related inventory reserve reversals . the current year period benefited from reversals of inventory reserves established in the prior year relative to certain cleated footwear , sport specific apparel and gloves . these products have historically been more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 93.3 million to $ 418.2 million in 2010 from $ 324.9 million in 2009 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses increased to 39.3% ( 39.3 % ) in 2010 from 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) in 2009 . these changes were primarily attributable to the following : 2022 marketing costs increased $ 19.3 million to $ 128.2 million in 2010 from $ 108.9 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in sponsorship of events and collegiate and professional teams and athletes , increased television and digital campaign costs , including media campaigns for specific customers and additional personnel costs . in addition , we incurred increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 12.0% ( 12.0 % ) in 2010 from 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to decreased marketing costs for specific customers. .
Question: what was the gross profit in 2010?
Answer: 530.5
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 120.4
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 410.1
Question: what was the gross profit in 2009?
Answer: 120.4
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2009 gross profit, in percentage?
| 3.40615 |
CONVFINQA8956 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout 2018 and as of 30 september 2018 our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future . as of 30 september 2018 , we had $ 995.1 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . as a result of the tax act , we currently do not expect that a significant portion of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates will be subject to u.s . income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states . depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside , the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes . however , since we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s . refer to note 22 , income taxes , for additional information . our cash flows from operating , investing , and financing activities from continuing operations , as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash provided by ( used for )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating activities</td><td>$ 2554.7</td><td>$ 2534.1</td><td>$ 2258.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investing activities</td><td>-1649.1 ( 1649.1 )</td><td>-1417.7 ( 1417.7 )</td><td>-864.8 ( 864.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>financing activities</td><td>-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )</td><td>-2040.9 ( 2040.9 )</td><td>-860.2 ( 860.2 )</td></tr></table> operating activities for the year ended 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2554.7 . income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , share-based compensation , and noncurrent capital lease receivables . other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions . the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities . in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 . the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables . the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules . in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s . inventories from lifo to fifo . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 123.6 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures for the year ended 2017 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2534.1 . income from continuing operations of $ 1134.4 included a goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $ 162.1 , an equity method investment impairment charge of $ 79.5 , and a write-down of long-lived assets associated with restructuring of $ 69.2 . refer to note 5 , cost reduction and asset actions ; note 8 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates ; note 10 , goodwill ; and note 11 , intangible assets , of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these charges . other adjustments of $ 165.4 included changes in uncertain tax positions and the fair value of foreign exchange contracts that hedge intercompany loans as well as pension contributions and expense . the working capital accounts were a source of cash of $ 48.0 that were primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities and other receivables , partially offset by other working capital and trade receivables . the increase in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 163.8 was primarily due to timing differences related to payables and accrued liabilities and an increase in customer advances of $ 52.8 primarily related to sale of equipment activity . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 124.7 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . other working capital was a use of cash of $ 154.0 , primarily driven by payments for income taxes . trade receivables was a use of cash of $ 73.6 which is primarily due to timing differences. .
Question: what was the net cash from operating and investing activities in 2016?
| 1394.0 |
CONVFINQA8957 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout 2018 and as of 30 september 2018 our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future . as of 30 september 2018 , we had $ 995.1 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . as a result of the tax act , we currently do not expect that a significant portion of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates will be subject to u.s . income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states . depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside , the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes . however , since we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s . refer to note 22 , income taxes , for additional information . our cash flows from operating , investing , and financing activities from continuing operations , as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash provided by ( used for )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating activities</td><td>$ 2554.7</td><td>$ 2534.1</td><td>$ 2258.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investing activities</td><td>-1649.1 ( 1649.1 )</td><td>-1417.7 ( 1417.7 )</td><td>-864.8 ( 864.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>financing activities</td><td>-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )</td><td>-2040.9 ( 2040.9 )</td><td>-860.2 ( 860.2 )</td></tr></table> operating activities for the year ended 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2554.7 . income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , share-based compensation , and noncurrent capital lease receivables . other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions . the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities . in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 . the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables . the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules . in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s . inventories from lifo to fifo . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 123.6 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures for the year ended 2017 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2534.1 . income from continuing operations of $ 1134.4 included a goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $ 162.1 , an equity method investment impairment charge of $ 79.5 , and a write-down of long-lived assets associated with restructuring of $ 69.2 . refer to note 5 , cost reduction and asset actions ; note 8 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates ; note 10 , goodwill ; and note 11 , intangible assets , of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these charges . other adjustments of $ 165.4 included changes in uncertain tax positions and the fair value of foreign exchange contracts that hedge intercompany loans as well as pension contributions and expense . the working capital accounts were a source of cash of $ 48.0 that were primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities and other receivables , partially offset by other working capital and trade receivables . the increase in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 163.8 was primarily due to timing differences related to payables and accrued liabilities and an increase in customer advances of $ 52.8 primarily related to sale of equipment activity . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 124.7 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . other working capital was a use of cash of $ 154.0 , primarily driven by payments for income taxes . trade receivables was a use of cash of $ 73.6 which is primarily due to timing differences. .
Question: what was the net cash from operating and investing activities in 2016?
Answer: 1394.0
Question: and the amount used for financing activities for that year?
| 860.2 |
CONVFINQA8958 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout 2018 and as of 30 september 2018 our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future . as of 30 september 2018 , we had $ 995.1 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . as a result of the tax act , we currently do not expect that a significant portion of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates will be subject to u.s . income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states . depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside , the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes . however , since we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s . refer to note 22 , income taxes , for additional information . our cash flows from operating , investing , and financing activities from continuing operations , as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash provided by ( used for )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating activities</td><td>$ 2554.7</td><td>$ 2534.1</td><td>$ 2258.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investing activities</td><td>-1649.1 ( 1649.1 )</td><td>-1417.7 ( 1417.7 )</td><td>-864.8 ( 864.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>financing activities</td><td>-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )</td><td>-2040.9 ( 2040.9 )</td><td>-860.2 ( 860.2 )</td></tr></table> operating activities for the year ended 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2554.7 . income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , share-based compensation , and noncurrent capital lease receivables . other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions . the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities . in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 . the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables . the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules . in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s . inventories from lifo to fifo . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 123.6 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures for the year ended 2017 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2534.1 . income from continuing operations of $ 1134.4 included a goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $ 162.1 , an equity method investment impairment charge of $ 79.5 , and a write-down of long-lived assets associated with restructuring of $ 69.2 . refer to note 5 , cost reduction and asset actions ; note 8 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates ; note 10 , goodwill ; and note 11 , intangible assets , of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these charges . other adjustments of $ 165.4 included changes in uncertain tax positions and the fair value of foreign exchange contracts that hedge intercompany loans as well as pension contributions and expense . the working capital accounts were a source of cash of $ 48.0 that were primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities and other receivables , partially offset by other working capital and trade receivables . the increase in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 163.8 was primarily due to timing differences related to payables and accrued liabilities and an increase in customer advances of $ 52.8 primarily related to sale of equipment activity . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 124.7 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . other working capital was a use of cash of $ 154.0 , primarily driven by payments for income taxes . trade receivables was a use of cash of $ 73.6 which is primarily due to timing differences. .
Question: what was the net cash from operating and investing activities in 2016?
Answer: 1394.0
Question: and the amount used for financing activities for that year?
Answer: 860.2
Question: so what was the final amount of cash and cash equivalents?
| 533.8 |
CONVFINQA8959 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
skyworks solutions , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maintained a valuation allowance of $ 47.0 million . this valuation allowance is comprised of $ 33.6 million related to u.s . state tax credits , of which $ 3.6 million are state tax credits acquired from aati in fiscal year 2012 , and $ 13.4 million related to foreign deferred tax assets . if these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be reversed and up to a $ 46.6 million income tax benefit , and up to a $ 0.4 million reduction to goodwill may be recognized . the company will need to generate $ 209.0 million of future united states federal taxable income to utilize our united states deferred tax assets as of september 28 , 2012 . deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period . the company will continue to assess its valuation allowance in future periods . as of september 28 , 2012 , the company has united states federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $ 74.3 million , including $ 29.5 million related to the acquisition of sige , which will expire at various dates through 2030 and $ 28.1 million related to the acquisition of aati , which will expire at various dates through 2031 . the utilization of these net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under internal revenue code section 382 and similar state income tax provisions . the company also has united states federal income tax credit carry forwards of $ 37.8 million , of which $ 30.4 million of federal income tax credit carry forwards have not been recorded as a deferred tax asset . the company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $ 33.6 million , for which the company has provided a valuation allowance . the united states federal tax credits expire at various dates through 2032 . the state tax credits relate primarily to california research tax credits which can be carried forward indefinitely . the company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international jurisdictions . these activities will increase the company 2019s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions . as of september 28 , 2012 , no provision has been made for united states federal , state , or additional foreign income taxes related to approximately $ 371.5 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested . it is not practicable to determine the united states federal income tax liability , if any , which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested . the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively . of the total unrecognized tax benefits at september 28 , 2012 , $ 38.8 million would impact the effective tax rate , if recognized . the remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate , if recognized , due to the company 2019s valuation allowance and certain positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which the company anticipates could change within the next twelve months . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>9004</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at september 28 2012</td><td>$ 52380</td></tr></table> page 114 annual report .
Question: what was the net change in unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012, in millions?
| 20.3 |
CONVFINQA8960 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
skyworks solutions , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maintained a valuation allowance of $ 47.0 million . this valuation allowance is comprised of $ 33.6 million related to u.s . state tax credits , of which $ 3.6 million are state tax credits acquired from aati in fiscal year 2012 , and $ 13.4 million related to foreign deferred tax assets . if these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be reversed and up to a $ 46.6 million income tax benefit , and up to a $ 0.4 million reduction to goodwill may be recognized . the company will need to generate $ 209.0 million of future united states federal taxable income to utilize our united states deferred tax assets as of september 28 , 2012 . deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period . the company will continue to assess its valuation allowance in future periods . as of september 28 , 2012 , the company has united states federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $ 74.3 million , including $ 29.5 million related to the acquisition of sige , which will expire at various dates through 2030 and $ 28.1 million related to the acquisition of aati , which will expire at various dates through 2031 . the utilization of these net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under internal revenue code section 382 and similar state income tax provisions . the company also has united states federal income tax credit carry forwards of $ 37.8 million , of which $ 30.4 million of federal income tax credit carry forwards have not been recorded as a deferred tax asset . the company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $ 33.6 million , for which the company has provided a valuation allowance . the united states federal tax credits expire at various dates through 2032 . the state tax credits relate primarily to california research tax credits which can be carried forward indefinitely . the company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international jurisdictions . these activities will increase the company 2019s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions . as of september 28 , 2012 , no provision has been made for united states federal , state , or additional foreign income taxes related to approximately $ 371.5 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested . it is not practicable to determine the united states federal income tax liability , if any , which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested . the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively . of the total unrecognized tax benefits at september 28 , 2012 , $ 38.8 million would impact the effective tax rate , if recognized . the remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate , if recognized , due to the company 2019s valuation allowance and certain positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which the company anticipates could change within the next twelve months . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>9004</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at september 28 2012</td><td>$ 52380</td></tr></table> page 114 annual report .
Question: what was the net change in unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012, in millions?
Answer: 20.3
Question: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to those tax benefits in 2011?
| 0.62995 |
CONVFINQA8961 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the change in value of management fees earned from 2015 to 2016?
| 2.3 |
CONVFINQA8962 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the change in value of management fees earned from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 2.3
Question: what is the change divided by the 2015 value?
| 0.51111 |
CONVFINQA8963 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the change in value of management fees earned from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 2.3
Question: what is the change divided by the 2015 value?
Answer: 0.51111
Question: what is that shown as a percent?
| 51.11111 |
CONVFINQA8964 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the performance of the citi common stock from 2010 to 2015?
| 10.14 |
CONVFINQA8965 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the performance of the citi common stock from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 10.14
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2010, in percentage?
| 0.1014 |
CONVFINQA8966 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 2 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements the company recognizes income on long-term construction contracts where the company serves as a general contractor on the percentage of completion method . using this method , profits are recorded on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion of individual contracts , commencing when progress reaches a point where experience is sufficient to estimate final results with reasonable accuracy . that portion of the estimated earnings is accrued on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion based on contract expenditures incurred and work performed . property sales gains from sales of depreciated property are recognized in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 66 , and are included in earnings from sales of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , in the statement of operations if identified as held for sale prior to adoption of sfas 144 and in discontinued operations if identified as held for sale after adoption of sfas 144 . gains or losses from the sale of property which is considered held for sale in dclp are recognized in accordance with sfas 66 and are included in construction management and development activity income in the statement of operations . net income per common share basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common shares and minority interest in earnings of unitholders , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and units outstanding and dilutive potential common shares for the period . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per share ( in thousands ) : the series d convertible preferred stock and the series g convertible preferred limited partner units were anti-dilutive for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 ; therefore , no conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . in september 2002 , the company redeemed the series g convertible preferred units at their par value of $ 35.0 million . a joint venture partner in one of the company 2019s unconsolidated companies has the option to convert a portion of its ownership to company common shares ( see discussion in investments in unconsolidated companies section ) . the effect of the option on earnings per share was dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2001 ; therefore , conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . federal income taxes the company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code . to qualify as a reit , the company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of its taxable income to its stockholders . management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain the company 2019s reit status . as a reit , the company is entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends it pays to its shareholders . accordingly , the company generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as it distributes an amount equal to or in excess of its taxable income currently to its stockholders . a reit generally is subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to its shareholders . if the company fails to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , it will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years . reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes paid by the company . in addition , the company 2019s financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes . as a reit , the company may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if it engages in certain types of transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>basic net income available for common shares</td><td>$ 161272</td><td>$ 229967</td><td>$ 212958</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership net income</td><td>2014</td><td>3423</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>minority interest in earnings of common unitholders</td><td>18568</td><td>32463</td><td>32071</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted net income available for common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>$ 179840</td><td>$ 265853</td><td>$ 245029</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>133981</td><td>129660</td><td>126836</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average partnership units outstanding</td><td>15442</td><td>18301</td><td>19070</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership common share equivalents</td><td>2014</td><td>2092</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plans</td><td>1416</td><td>1657</td><td>1535</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>150839</td><td>151710</td><td>147441</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total basic net income for 2001 and 2002?
| 391239.0 |
CONVFINQA8967 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 2 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements the company recognizes income on long-term construction contracts where the company serves as a general contractor on the percentage of completion method . using this method , profits are recorded on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion of individual contracts , commencing when progress reaches a point where experience is sufficient to estimate final results with reasonable accuracy . that portion of the estimated earnings is accrued on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion based on contract expenditures incurred and work performed . property sales gains from sales of depreciated property are recognized in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 66 , and are included in earnings from sales of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , in the statement of operations if identified as held for sale prior to adoption of sfas 144 and in discontinued operations if identified as held for sale after adoption of sfas 144 . gains or losses from the sale of property which is considered held for sale in dclp are recognized in accordance with sfas 66 and are included in construction management and development activity income in the statement of operations . net income per common share basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common shares and minority interest in earnings of unitholders , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and units outstanding and dilutive potential common shares for the period . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per share ( in thousands ) : the series d convertible preferred stock and the series g convertible preferred limited partner units were anti-dilutive for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 ; therefore , no conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . in september 2002 , the company redeemed the series g convertible preferred units at their par value of $ 35.0 million . a joint venture partner in one of the company 2019s unconsolidated companies has the option to convert a portion of its ownership to company common shares ( see discussion in investments in unconsolidated companies section ) . the effect of the option on earnings per share was dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2001 ; therefore , conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . federal income taxes the company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code . to qualify as a reit , the company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of its taxable income to its stockholders . management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain the company 2019s reit status . as a reit , the company is entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends it pays to its shareholders . accordingly , the company generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as it distributes an amount equal to or in excess of its taxable income currently to its stockholders . a reit generally is subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to its shareholders . if the company fails to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , it will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years . reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes paid by the company . in addition , the company 2019s financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes . as a reit , the company may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if it engages in certain types of transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>basic net income available for common shares</td><td>$ 161272</td><td>$ 229967</td><td>$ 212958</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership net income</td><td>2014</td><td>3423</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>minority interest in earnings of common unitholders</td><td>18568</td><td>32463</td><td>32071</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted net income available for common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>$ 179840</td><td>$ 265853</td><td>$ 245029</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>133981</td><td>129660</td><td>126836</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average partnership units outstanding</td><td>15442</td><td>18301</td><td>19070</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership common share equivalents</td><td>2014</td><td>2092</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plans</td><td>1416</td><td>1657</td><td>1535</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>150839</td><td>151710</td><td>147441</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total basic net income for 2001 and 2002?
Answer: 391239.0
Question: and including 2000?
| 604197.0 |
CONVFINQA8968 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 2 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements the company recognizes income on long-term construction contracts where the company serves as a general contractor on the percentage of completion method . using this method , profits are recorded on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion of individual contracts , commencing when progress reaches a point where experience is sufficient to estimate final results with reasonable accuracy . that portion of the estimated earnings is accrued on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion based on contract expenditures incurred and work performed . property sales gains from sales of depreciated property are recognized in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 66 , and are included in earnings from sales of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , in the statement of operations if identified as held for sale prior to adoption of sfas 144 and in discontinued operations if identified as held for sale after adoption of sfas 144 . gains or losses from the sale of property which is considered held for sale in dclp are recognized in accordance with sfas 66 and are included in construction management and development activity income in the statement of operations . net income per common share basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common shares and minority interest in earnings of unitholders , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and units outstanding and dilutive potential common shares for the period . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per share ( in thousands ) : the series d convertible preferred stock and the series g convertible preferred limited partner units were anti-dilutive for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 ; therefore , no conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . in september 2002 , the company redeemed the series g convertible preferred units at their par value of $ 35.0 million . a joint venture partner in one of the company 2019s unconsolidated companies has the option to convert a portion of its ownership to company common shares ( see discussion in investments in unconsolidated companies section ) . the effect of the option on earnings per share was dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2001 ; therefore , conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . federal income taxes the company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code . to qualify as a reit , the company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of its taxable income to its stockholders . management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain the company 2019s reit status . as a reit , the company is entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends it pays to its shareholders . accordingly , the company generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as it distributes an amount equal to or in excess of its taxable income currently to its stockholders . a reit generally is subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to its shareholders . if the company fails to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , it will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years . reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes paid by the company . in addition , the company 2019s financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes . as a reit , the company may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if it engages in certain types of transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>basic net income available for common shares</td><td>$ 161272</td><td>$ 229967</td><td>$ 212958</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership net income</td><td>2014</td><td>3423</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>minority interest in earnings of common unitholders</td><td>18568</td><td>32463</td><td>32071</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted net income available for common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>$ 179840</td><td>$ 265853</td><td>$ 245029</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>133981</td><td>129660</td><td>126836</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average partnership units outstanding</td><td>15442</td><td>18301</td><td>19070</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership common share equivalents</td><td>2014</td><td>2092</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plans</td><td>1416</td><td>1657</td><td>1535</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>150839</td><td>151710</td><td>147441</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total basic net income for 2001 and 2002?
Answer: 391239.0
Question: and including 2000?
Answer: 604197.0
Question: so what was the average of this value over these years?
| 201399.0 |
CONVFINQA8969 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reduced administrative expense . in connection with this project , we eliminated 749 positions . we incurred $ 54.7 million of net expenses , most of which was cash . we recorded $ 0.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , restructuring charges were reduced by $ 0.4 million in fiscal 2017 , and we incurred $ 54.7 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . in fiscal 2015 , we announced project century ( century ) which initially involved a review of our north american manufacturing and distribution network to streamline operations and identify potential capacity reductions . in fiscal 2016 , we broadened the scope of century to identify opportunities to streamline our supply chain outside of north america . as part of century , in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close manufacturing facilities in our europe & australia segment supply chain located in berwick , united kingdom and east tamaki , new zealand . these actions affected 287 positions and we incurred $ 31.8 million of net expenses related to these actions , of which $ 12 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.8 million of restructuring charges relating to these actions in fiscal 2017 and $ 30.0 million in fiscal 2016 . these actions were completed in fiscal 2017 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our west chicago , illinois cereal and dry dinner manufacturing plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 484 positions , and we incurred $ 109.3 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which $ 21 million was cash . we recorded $ 6.9 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 23.2 million in fiscal 2017 and $ 79.2 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our joplin , missouri snacks plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 125 positions , and we incurred $ 8.0 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which less than $ 1 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 0.3 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 6.3 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . we paid cash related to restructuring initiatives of $ 53.6 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 107.8 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 122.6 million in fiscal 2016 . in addition to restructuring charges , we expect to incur approximately $ 130 million of project-related costs , which will be recorded in cost of sales , all of which will be cash . we recorded project-related costs in cost of sales of $ 11.3 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 43.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 57.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we paid cash for project-related costs of $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 46.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 54.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we expect these activities to be completed in fiscal 2019 . restructuring charges and project-related costs are classified in our consolidated statements of earnings as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal 2018</td><td>fiscal 2017</td><td>fiscal 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 14.0</td><td>$ 41.5</td><td>$ 78.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>68.7</td><td>182.6</td><td>151.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total restructuring charges</td><td>82.7</td><td>224.1</td><td>229.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>project-related costs classified in cost ofsales</td><td>$ 11.3</td><td>$ 43.9</td><td>$ 57.5</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of cash related to restructuring initiatives in 2016?
| 122.6 |
CONVFINQA8970 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reduced administrative expense . in connection with this project , we eliminated 749 positions . we incurred $ 54.7 million of net expenses , most of which was cash . we recorded $ 0.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , restructuring charges were reduced by $ 0.4 million in fiscal 2017 , and we incurred $ 54.7 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . in fiscal 2015 , we announced project century ( century ) which initially involved a review of our north american manufacturing and distribution network to streamline operations and identify potential capacity reductions . in fiscal 2016 , we broadened the scope of century to identify opportunities to streamline our supply chain outside of north america . as part of century , in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close manufacturing facilities in our europe & australia segment supply chain located in berwick , united kingdom and east tamaki , new zealand . these actions affected 287 positions and we incurred $ 31.8 million of net expenses related to these actions , of which $ 12 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.8 million of restructuring charges relating to these actions in fiscal 2017 and $ 30.0 million in fiscal 2016 . these actions were completed in fiscal 2017 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our west chicago , illinois cereal and dry dinner manufacturing plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 484 positions , and we incurred $ 109.3 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which $ 21 million was cash . we recorded $ 6.9 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 23.2 million in fiscal 2017 and $ 79.2 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our joplin , missouri snacks plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 125 positions , and we incurred $ 8.0 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which less than $ 1 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 0.3 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 6.3 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . we paid cash related to restructuring initiatives of $ 53.6 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 107.8 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 122.6 million in fiscal 2016 . in addition to restructuring charges , we expect to incur approximately $ 130 million of project-related costs , which will be recorded in cost of sales , all of which will be cash . we recorded project-related costs in cost of sales of $ 11.3 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 43.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 57.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we paid cash for project-related costs of $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 46.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 54.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we expect these activities to be completed in fiscal 2019 . restructuring charges and project-related costs are classified in our consolidated statements of earnings as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal 2018</td><td>fiscal 2017</td><td>fiscal 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 14.0</td><td>$ 41.5</td><td>$ 78.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>68.7</td><td>182.6</td><td>151.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total restructuring charges</td><td>82.7</td><td>224.1</td><td>229.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>project-related costs classified in cost ofsales</td><td>$ 11.3</td><td>$ 43.9</td><td>$ 57.5</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of cash related to restructuring initiatives in 2016?
Answer: 122.6
Question: what was the value in 2017?
| 107.8 |
CONVFINQA8971 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reduced administrative expense . in connection with this project , we eliminated 749 positions . we incurred $ 54.7 million of net expenses , most of which was cash . we recorded $ 0.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , restructuring charges were reduced by $ 0.4 million in fiscal 2017 , and we incurred $ 54.7 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . in fiscal 2015 , we announced project century ( century ) which initially involved a review of our north american manufacturing and distribution network to streamline operations and identify potential capacity reductions . in fiscal 2016 , we broadened the scope of century to identify opportunities to streamline our supply chain outside of north america . as part of century , in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close manufacturing facilities in our europe & australia segment supply chain located in berwick , united kingdom and east tamaki , new zealand . these actions affected 287 positions and we incurred $ 31.8 million of net expenses related to these actions , of which $ 12 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.8 million of restructuring charges relating to these actions in fiscal 2017 and $ 30.0 million in fiscal 2016 . these actions were completed in fiscal 2017 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our west chicago , illinois cereal and dry dinner manufacturing plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 484 positions , and we incurred $ 109.3 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which $ 21 million was cash . we recorded $ 6.9 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 23.2 million in fiscal 2017 and $ 79.2 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our joplin , missouri snacks plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 125 positions , and we incurred $ 8.0 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which less than $ 1 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 0.3 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 6.3 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . we paid cash related to restructuring initiatives of $ 53.6 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 107.8 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 122.6 million in fiscal 2016 . in addition to restructuring charges , we expect to incur approximately $ 130 million of project-related costs , which will be recorded in cost of sales , all of which will be cash . we recorded project-related costs in cost of sales of $ 11.3 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 43.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 57.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we paid cash for project-related costs of $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 46.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 54.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we expect these activities to be completed in fiscal 2019 . restructuring charges and project-related costs are classified in our consolidated statements of earnings as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal 2018</td><td>fiscal 2017</td><td>fiscal 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 14.0</td><td>$ 41.5</td><td>$ 78.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>68.7</td><td>182.6</td><td>151.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total restructuring charges</td><td>82.7</td><td>224.1</td><td>229.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>project-related costs classified in cost ofsales</td><td>$ 11.3</td><td>$ 43.9</td><td>$ 57.5</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of cash related to restructuring initiatives in 2016?
Answer: 122.6
Question: what was the value in 2017?
Answer: 107.8
Question: what is the sum for those 2 years?
| 230.4 |
CONVFINQA8972 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reduced administrative expense . in connection with this project , we eliminated 749 positions . we incurred $ 54.7 million of net expenses , most of which was cash . we recorded $ 0.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , restructuring charges were reduced by $ 0.4 million in fiscal 2017 , and we incurred $ 54.7 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . in fiscal 2015 , we announced project century ( century ) which initially involved a review of our north american manufacturing and distribution network to streamline operations and identify potential capacity reductions . in fiscal 2016 , we broadened the scope of century to identify opportunities to streamline our supply chain outside of north america . as part of century , in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close manufacturing facilities in our europe & australia segment supply chain located in berwick , united kingdom and east tamaki , new zealand . these actions affected 287 positions and we incurred $ 31.8 million of net expenses related to these actions , of which $ 12 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.8 million of restructuring charges relating to these actions in fiscal 2017 and $ 30.0 million in fiscal 2016 . these actions were completed in fiscal 2017 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our west chicago , illinois cereal and dry dinner manufacturing plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 484 positions , and we incurred $ 109.3 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which $ 21 million was cash . we recorded $ 6.9 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 23.2 million in fiscal 2017 and $ 79.2 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our joplin , missouri snacks plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 125 positions , and we incurred $ 8.0 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which less than $ 1 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 0.3 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 6.3 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . we paid cash related to restructuring initiatives of $ 53.6 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 107.8 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 122.6 million in fiscal 2016 . in addition to restructuring charges , we expect to incur approximately $ 130 million of project-related costs , which will be recorded in cost of sales , all of which will be cash . we recorded project-related costs in cost of sales of $ 11.3 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 43.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 57.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we paid cash for project-related costs of $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 46.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 54.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we expect these activities to be completed in fiscal 2019 . restructuring charges and project-related costs are classified in our consolidated statements of earnings as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal 2018</td><td>fiscal 2017</td><td>fiscal 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 14.0</td><td>$ 41.5</td><td>$ 78.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>68.7</td><td>182.6</td><td>151.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total restructuring charges</td><td>82.7</td><td>224.1</td><td>229.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>project-related costs classified in cost ofsales</td><td>$ 11.3</td><td>$ 43.9</td><td>$ 57.5</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of cash related to restructuring initiatives in 2016?
Answer: 122.6
Question: what was the value in 2017?
Answer: 107.8
Question: what is the sum for those 2 years?
Answer: 230.4
Question: what was the 2018 value?
| 53.6 |
CONVFINQA8973 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reduced administrative expense . in connection with this project , we eliminated 749 positions . we incurred $ 54.7 million of net expenses , most of which was cash . we recorded $ 0.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , restructuring charges were reduced by $ 0.4 million in fiscal 2017 , and we incurred $ 54.7 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . in fiscal 2015 , we announced project century ( century ) which initially involved a review of our north american manufacturing and distribution network to streamline operations and identify potential capacity reductions . in fiscal 2016 , we broadened the scope of century to identify opportunities to streamline our supply chain outside of north america . as part of century , in the second quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close manufacturing facilities in our europe & australia segment supply chain located in berwick , united kingdom and east tamaki , new zealand . these actions affected 287 positions and we incurred $ 31.8 million of net expenses related to these actions , of which $ 12 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.8 million of restructuring charges relating to these actions in fiscal 2017 and $ 30.0 million in fiscal 2016 . these actions were completed in fiscal 2017 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our west chicago , illinois cereal and dry dinner manufacturing plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 484 positions , and we incurred $ 109.3 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which $ 21 million was cash . we recorded $ 6.9 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 23.2 million in fiscal 2017 and $ 79.2 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . as part of century , in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , we approved a restructuring plan to close our joplin , missouri snacks plant in our north america retail segment supply chain . this action affected 125 positions , and we incurred $ 8.0 million of net expenses relating to this action , of which less than $ 1 million was cash . we recorded $ 1.4 million of restructuring charges relating to this action in fiscal 2018 , $ 0.3 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 6.3 million in fiscal 2016 . this action was completed in fiscal 2018 . we paid cash related to restructuring initiatives of $ 53.6 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 107.8 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 122.6 million in fiscal 2016 . in addition to restructuring charges , we expect to incur approximately $ 130 million of project-related costs , which will be recorded in cost of sales , all of which will be cash . we recorded project-related costs in cost of sales of $ 11.3 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 43.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 57.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we paid cash for project-related costs of $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2018 , $ 46.9 million in fiscal 2017 , and $ 54.5 million in fiscal 2016 . we expect these activities to be completed in fiscal 2019 . restructuring charges and project-related costs are classified in our consolidated statements of earnings as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal 2018</td><td>fiscal 2017</td><td>fiscal 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 14.0</td><td>$ 41.5</td><td>$ 78.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>68.7</td><td>182.6</td><td>151.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total restructuring charges</td><td>82.7</td><td>224.1</td><td>229.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>project-related costs classified in cost ofsales</td><td>$ 11.3</td><td>$ 43.9</td><td>$ 57.5</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of cash related to restructuring initiatives in 2016?
Answer: 122.6
Question: what was the value in 2017?
Answer: 107.8
Question: what is the sum for those 2 years?
Answer: 230.4
Question: what was the 2018 value?
Answer: 53.6
Question: what is the total sum?
| 284.0 |
CONVFINQA8974 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>share awards</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2007</td><td>278</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>400</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2008</td><td>518</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>430</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-159 ( 159 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2009</td><td>762</td><td>42</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, what was the total value of the non-vested shares, in thousands?
| 32004.0 |
CONVFINQA8975 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>share awards</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2007</td><td>278</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>400</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2008</td><td>518</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>430</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-159 ( 159 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2009</td><td>762</td><td>42</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, what was the total value of the non-vested shares, in thousands?
Answer: 32004.0
Question: and what is that in millions?
| 32.004 |
CONVFINQA8976 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>share awards</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2007</td><td>278</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>400</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2008</td><td>518</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>430</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-159 ( 159 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2009</td><td>762</td><td>42</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, what was the total value of the non-vested shares, in thousands?
Answer: 32004.0
Question: and what is that in millions?
Answer: 32.004
Question: and in the year before, what was that full value, also in thousands?
| 20202.0 |
CONVFINQA8977 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>share awards</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2007</td><td>278</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>400</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2008</td><td>518</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>430</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-159 ( 159 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2009</td><td>762</td><td>42</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, what was the total value of the non-vested shares, in thousands?
Answer: 32004.0
Question: and what is that in millions?
Answer: 32.004
Question: and in the year before, what was that full value, also in thousands?
Answer: 20202.0
Question: and what is that in millions?
| 20.202 |
CONVFINQA8978 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 9 2014goodwill and other intangibles , net goodwill the following table outlines the activity in the carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill , which is all assigned to the company 2019s trading and investing segment ( dollars in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>trading & investing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1934232</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>activity</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>1934232</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impairment of goodwill</td><td>-142423 ( 142423 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 1791809</td></tr></table> goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes indicate the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and the loss may not be recoverable . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company 2019s trading and investing segment had two reporting units ; market making and retail brokerage . at the end of june 2013 , the company decided to exit its market making business . based on this decision in the second quarter of 2013 , the company conducted an interim goodwill impairment test for the market making reporting unit , using the expected sale structure of the market making business . this structure assumed a shorter period of cash flows related to an order flow arrangement , compared to prior estimates of fair value . based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test , the company determined that the carrying value of the market making reporting unit , including goodwill , exceeded the fair value for that reporting unit as of june 30 , 2013 . the company proceeded to the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment . as a result of the evaluation , it was determined that the entire carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the market making reporting unit was impaired , and the company recognized a $ 142.4 million impairment of goodwill during the second quarter of 2013 . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company performed its annual goodwill assessment for the retail brokerage reporting unit , electing to qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value . as a result of this assessment , the company determined that the first step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary , and concluded that goodwill was not impaired at december 31 , 2013 . at december 31 , 2013 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 142.4 million related to the trading and investing segment and $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment . at december 31 , 2012 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment. .
Question: as of december 31, 2013, what percentage did the impairment of goodwill represent in relation to the total goodwill balance?
| 0.07949 |
CONVFINQA8979 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 9 2014goodwill and other intangibles , net goodwill the following table outlines the activity in the carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill , which is all assigned to the company 2019s trading and investing segment ( dollars in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>trading & investing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1934232</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>activity</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>1934232</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impairment of goodwill</td><td>-142423 ( 142423 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 1791809</td></tr></table> goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes indicate the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and the loss may not be recoverable . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company 2019s trading and investing segment had two reporting units ; market making and retail brokerage . at the end of june 2013 , the company decided to exit its market making business . based on this decision in the second quarter of 2013 , the company conducted an interim goodwill impairment test for the market making reporting unit , using the expected sale structure of the market making business . this structure assumed a shorter period of cash flows related to an order flow arrangement , compared to prior estimates of fair value . based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test , the company determined that the carrying value of the market making reporting unit , including goodwill , exceeded the fair value for that reporting unit as of june 30 , 2013 . the company proceeded to the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment . as a result of the evaluation , it was determined that the entire carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the market making reporting unit was impaired , and the company recognized a $ 142.4 million impairment of goodwill during the second quarter of 2013 . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company performed its annual goodwill assessment for the retail brokerage reporting unit , electing to qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value . as a result of this assessment , the company determined that the first step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary , and concluded that goodwill was not impaired at december 31 , 2013 . at december 31 , 2013 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 142.4 million related to the trading and investing segment and $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment . at december 31 , 2012 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment. .
Question: as of december 31, 2013, what percentage did the impairment of goodwill represent in relation to the total goodwill balance?
Answer: 0.07949
Question: and what was this impairment amount as a percentage of that balance as of december 31 of the previous year?
| -0.07363 |
CONVFINQA8980 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2007 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>$ 595338</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>$ 663750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>96454</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-80258 ( 80258 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>$ 756703</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the variation in the additions during 2005 and 2006?
| 5908.0 |
CONVFINQA8981 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2007 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>$ 595338</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>$ 663750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>96454</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-80258 ( 80258 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>$ 756703</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the variation in the additions during 2005 and 2006?
Answer: 5908.0
Question: and the increase in the deductions in 2006 and 2007?
| 67451.0 |
CONVFINQA8982 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on business divestitures and impairments , net we strive to have a number one or number two market position in each of the markets we serve , or have a clear path on how we will achieve a leading market position over time . where we cannot establish a leading market position , or where operations are not generating acceptable returns , we may decide to divest certain assets and reallocate resources to other markets . asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . during 2017 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 27.1 million . we also recorded a gain on business divestitures of $ 6.8 million due to the transfer of ownership of the landfill gas collection and control system and the remaining post-closure and environmental liabilities associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we recorded a charge to earnings of $ 4.6 million primarily related to environmental costs associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we also recorded a net gain related to a business divestiture of $ 4.7 million . restructuring charges in january 2018 , we eliminated certain positions following the consolidation of select back-office functions , including but not limited to the integration of our national accounts support functions into our existing corporate support functions . these changes include a reduction in administrative staffing and the closure of certain office locations . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . in january 2016 , we realigned our field support functions by combining our three regions into two field groups , consolidating our areas and streamlining select operational support roles at our phoenix headquarters . additionally , in the second quarter of 2016 , we began the redesign of our back-office functions as well as the consolidation of over 100 customer service locations into three customer resource centers . the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems continued into 2018 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we incurred $ 17.6 million and $ 40.7 million of restructuring charges , respectively , that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , transition costs , relocation benefits , and the closure of offices with lease agreements with non-cancelable terms . the savings realized from these restructuring efforts have been reinvested in our customer-focused programs and initiatives . interest expense the following table provides the components of interest expense , including accretion of debt discounts and accretion of discounts primarily associated with environmental and risk insurance liabilities assumed in acquisitions ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 349.4</td><td>$ 324.8</td><td>$ 324.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash interest</td><td>41.2</td><td>43.6</td><td>53.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td><td>-6.5 ( 6.5 )</td><td>-6.2 ( 6.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total interest expense</td><td>$ 383.8</td><td>$ 361.9</td><td>$ 371.3</td></tr></table> total interest expense for 2018 increased compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in debt outstanding during the period and higher interest rates on floating rate debt . total interest expense for 2017 decreased .
Question: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018?
| 349.4 |
CONVFINQA8983 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on business divestitures and impairments , net we strive to have a number one or number two market position in each of the markets we serve , or have a clear path on how we will achieve a leading market position over time . where we cannot establish a leading market position , or where operations are not generating acceptable returns , we may decide to divest certain assets and reallocate resources to other markets . asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . during 2017 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 27.1 million . we also recorded a gain on business divestitures of $ 6.8 million due to the transfer of ownership of the landfill gas collection and control system and the remaining post-closure and environmental liabilities associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we recorded a charge to earnings of $ 4.6 million primarily related to environmental costs associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we also recorded a net gain related to a business divestiture of $ 4.7 million . restructuring charges in january 2018 , we eliminated certain positions following the consolidation of select back-office functions , including but not limited to the integration of our national accounts support functions into our existing corporate support functions . these changes include a reduction in administrative staffing and the closure of certain office locations . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . in january 2016 , we realigned our field support functions by combining our three regions into two field groups , consolidating our areas and streamlining select operational support roles at our phoenix headquarters . additionally , in the second quarter of 2016 , we began the redesign of our back-office functions as well as the consolidation of over 100 customer service locations into three customer resource centers . the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems continued into 2018 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we incurred $ 17.6 million and $ 40.7 million of restructuring charges , respectively , that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , transition costs , relocation benefits , and the closure of offices with lease agreements with non-cancelable terms . the savings realized from these restructuring efforts have been reinvested in our customer-focused programs and initiatives . interest expense the following table provides the components of interest expense , including accretion of debt discounts and accretion of discounts primarily associated with environmental and risk insurance liabilities assumed in acquisitions ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 349.4</td><td>$ 324.8</td><td>$ 324.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash interest</td><td>41.2</td><td>43.6</td><td>53.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td><td>-6.5 ( 6.5 )</td><td>-6.2 ( 6.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total interest expense</td><td>$ 383.8</td><td>$ 361.9</td><td>$ 371.3</td></tr></table> total interest expense for 2018 increased compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in debt outstanding during the period and higher interest rates on floating rate debt . total interest expense for 2017 decreased .
Question: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018?
Answer: 349.4
Question: what about in 2017?
| 324.8 |
CONVFINQA8984 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on business divestitures and impairments , net we strive to have a number one or number two market position in each of the markets we serve , or have a clear path on how we will achieve a leading market position over time . where we cannot establish a leading market position , or where operations are not generating acceptable returns , we may decide to divest certain assets and reallocate resources to other markets . asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . during 2017 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 27.1 million . we also recorded a gain on business divestitures of $ 6.8 million due to the transfer of ownership of the landfill gas collection and control system and the remaining post-closure and environmental liabilities associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we recorded a charge to earnings of $ 4.6 million primarily related to environmental costs associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we also recorded a net gain related to a business divestiture of $ 4.7 million . restructuring charges in january 2018 , we eliminated certain positions following the consolidation of select back-office functions , including but not limited to the integration of our national accounts support functions into our existing corporate support functions . these changes include a reduction in administrative staffing and the closure of certain office locations . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . in january 2016 , we realigned our field support functions by combining our three regions into two field groups , consolidating our areas and streamlining select operational support roles at our phoenix headquarters . additionally , in the second quarter of 2016 , we began the redesign of our back-office functions as well as the consolidation of over 100 customer service locations into three customer resource centers . the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems continued into 2018 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we incurred $ 17.6 million and $ 40.7 million of restructuring charges , respectively , that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , transition costs , relocation benefits , and the closure of offices with lease agreements with non-cancelable terms . the savings realized from these restructuring efforts have been reinvested in our customer-focused programs and initiatives . interest expense the following table provides the components of interest expense , including accretion of debt discounts and accretion of discounts primarily associated with environmental and risk insurance liabilities assumed in acquisitions ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 349.4</td><td>$ 324.8</td><td>$ 324.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash interest</td><td>41.2</td><td>43.6</td><td>53.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td><td>-6.5 ( 6.5 )</td><td>-6.2 ( 6.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total interest expense</td><td>$ 383.8</td><td>$ 361.9</td><td>$ 371.3</td></tr></table> total interest expense for 2018 increased compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in debt outstanding during the period and higher interest rates on floating rate debt . total interest expense for 2017 decreased .
Question: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018?
Answer: 349.4
Question: what about in 2017?
Answer: 324.8
Question: what is the net change among these years?
| 24.6 |
CONVFINQA8985 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on business divestitures and impairments , net we strive to have a number one or number two market position in each of the markets we serve , or have a clear path on how we will achieve a leading market position over time . where we cannot establish a leading market position , or where operations are not generating acceptable returns , we may decide to divest certain assets and reallocate resources to other markets . asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . during 2017 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 27.1 million . we also recorded a gain on business divestitures of $ 6.8 million due to the transfer of ownership of the landfill gas collection and control system and the remaining post-closure and environmental liabilities associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we recorded a charge to earnings of $ 4.6 million primarily related to environmental costs associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we also recorded a net gain related to a business divestiture of $ 4.7 million . restructuring charges in january 2018 , we eliminated certain positions following the consolidation of select back-office functions , including but not limited to the integration of our national accounts support functions into our existing corporate support functions . these changes include a reduction in administrative staffing and the closure of certain office locations . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . in january 2016 , we realigned our field support functions by combining our three regions into two field groups , consolidating our areas and streamlining select operational support roles at our phoenix headquarters . additionally , in the second quarter of 2016 , we began the redesign of our back-office functions as well as the consolidation of over 100 customer service locations into three customer resource centers . the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems continued into 2018 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we incurred $ 17.6 million and $ 40.7 million of restructuring charges , respectively , that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , transition costs , relocation benefits , and the closure of offices with lease agreements with non-cancelable terms . the savings realized from these restructuring efforts have been reinvested in our customer-focused programs and initiatives . interest expense the following table provides the components of interest expense , including accretion of debt discounts and accretion of discounts primarily associated with environmental and risk insurance liabilities assumed in acquisitions ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 349.4</td><td>$ 324.8</td><td>$ 324.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash interest</td><td>41.2</td><td>43.6</td><td>53.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td><td>-6.5 ( 6.5 )</td><td>-6.2 ( 6.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total interest expense</td><td>$ 383.8</td><td>$ 361.9</td><td>$ 371.3</td></tr></table> total interest expense for 2018 increased compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in debt outstanding during the period and higher interest rates on floating rate debt . total interest expense for 2017 decreased .
Question: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018?
Answer: 349.4
Question: what about in 2017?
Answer: 324.8
Question: what is the net change among these years?
Answer: 24.6
Question: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2017?
| 324.8 |
CONVFINQA8986 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
gain on business divestitures and impairments , net we strive to have a number one or number two market position in each of the markets we serve , or have a clear path on how we will achieve a leading market position over time . where we cannot establish a leading market position , or where operations are not generating acceptable returns , we may decide to divest certain assets and reallocate resources to other markets . asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . during 2017 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 27.1 million . we also recorded a gain on business divestitures of $ 6.8 million due to the transfer of ownership of the landfill gas collection and control system and the remaining post-closure and environmental liabilities associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we recorded a charge to earnings of $ 4.6 million primarily related to environmental costs associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we also recorded a net gain related to a business divestiture of $ 4.7 million . restructuring charges in january 2018 , we eliminated certain positions following the consolidation of select back-office functions , including but not limited to the integration of our national accounts support functions into our existing corporate support functions . these changes include a reduction in administrative staffing and the closure of certain office locations . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . in january 2016 , we realigned our field support functions by combining our three regions into two field groups , consolidating our areas and streamlining select operational support roles at our phoenix headquarters . additionally , in the second quarter of 2016 , we began the redesign of our back-office functions as well as the consolidation of over 100 customer service locations into three customer resource centers . the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems continued into 2018 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we incurred $ 17.6 million and $ 40.7 million of restructuring charges , respectively , that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , transition costs , relocation benefits , and the closure of offices with lease agreements with non-cancelable terms . the savings realized from these restructuring efforts have been reinvested in our customer-focused programs and initiatives . interest expense the following table provides the components of interest expense , including accretion of debt discounts and accretion of discounts primarily associated with environmental and risk insurance liabilities assumed in acquisitions ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 349.4</td><td>$ 324.8</td><td>$ 324.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash interest</td><td>41.2</td><td>43.6</td><td>53.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : capitalized interest</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td><td>-6.5 ( 6.5 )</td><td>-6.2 ( 6.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total interest expense</td><td>$ 383.8</td><td>$ 361.9</td><td>$ 371.3</td></tr></table> total interest expense for 2018 increased compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in debt outstanding during the period and higher interest rates on floating rate debt . total interest expense for 2017 decreased .
Question: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2018?
Answer: 349.4
Question: what about in 2017?
Answer: 324.8
Question: what is the net change among these years?
Answer: 24.6
Question: what is the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations in 2017?
Answer: 324.8
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.07574 |
CONVFINQA8987 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation | | those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .
Question: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?
| 46.4 |
CONVFINQA8988 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation | | those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .
Question: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?
Answer: 46.4
Question: and what were they in 2011?
| 43.1 |
CONVFINQA8989 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation | | those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .
Question: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?
Answer: 46.4
Question: and what were they in 2011?
Answer: 43.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 3.3 |
CONVFINQA8990 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation | | those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .
Question: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?
Answer: 46.4
Question: and what were they in 2011?
Answer: 43.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 3.3
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2011 expenses?
| 0.07657 |
CONVFINQA8991 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation | | those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .
Question: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?
Answer: 46.4
Question: and what were they in 2011?
Answer: 43.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 3.3
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2011 expenses?
Answer: 0.07657
Question: in that same period, what was the increase in the interest expense allocable to continuing operations?
| 24.7 |
CONVFINQA8992 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
29 annual report 2012 duke realty corporation | | those indirect costs not allocated to or absorbed by these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses . we regularly review our total overhead cost structure relative to our leasing , development and construction volume and adjust the level of total overhead , generally through changes in our level of staffing in various functional departments , as necessary in order to control overall general and administrative expense . general and administrative expenses increased from $ 43.1 million in 2011 to $ 46.4 million in 2012 . the following table sets forth the factors that led to the increase in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2011</td><td>$ 43.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reduction to overall pool of overhead costs ( 1 )</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increased absorption of costs by wholly-owned development and leasing activities ( 2 )</td><td>-14.7 ( 14.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduced allocation of costs to service operations and rental operations ( 3 )</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>general and administrative expenses - 2012</td><td>$ 46.4</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we reduced our total pool of overhead costs , through staff reductions and other measures , as the result of changes in our product mix and anticipated future levels of third-party construction , leasing , management and other operational activities . ( 2 ) we increased our focus on development of wholly-owned properties , and also significantly increased our leasing activity during 2012 , which resulted in an increased absorption of overhead costs . we capitalized $ 30.4 million and $ 20.0 million of our total overhead costs to leasing and development , respectively , for consolidated properties during 2012 , compared to capitalizing $ 25.3 million and $ 10.4 million of such costs , respectively , for 2011 . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . ( 3 ) the reduction in the allocation of overhead costs to service operations and rental operations resulted from reduced volumes of third-party construction projects as well as due to reducing our overall investment in office properties , which are more management intensive . interest expense interest expense allocable to continuing operations increased from $ 220.5 million in 2011 to $ 245.2 million in 2012 . we had $ 47.4 million of interest expense allocated to discontinued operations in 2011 , associated with the properties that were disposed of during 2011 , compared to the allocation of only $ 3.1 million of interest expense to discontinued operations for 2012 . total interest expense , combined for continuing and discontinued operations , decreased from $ 267.8 million in 2011 to $ 248.3 million in 2012 . the reduction in total interest expense was primarily the result of a lower weighted average borrowing rate in 2012 , due to refinancing some higher rate bonds in 2011 and 2012 , as well as a slight decrease in our average level of borrowings compared to 2011 . also , due to an increase in properties under development from 2011 , which met the criteria for capitalization of interest and were financed in part by common equity issuances during 2012 , a $ 5.0 million increase in capitalized interest also contributed to the decrease in total interest expense in 2012 . acquisition-related activity during 2012 , we recognized approximately $ 4.2 million in acquisition costs , compared to $ 2.3 million of such costs in 2011 . the increase from 2011 to 2012 is the result of acquiring a higher volume of medical office properties , where a higher level of acquisition costs are incurred than other property types , in 2012 . during 2011 , we also recognized a $ 1.1 million gain related to the acquisition of a building from one of our 50%-owned unconsolidated joint ventures . discontinued operations subject to certain criteria , the results of operations for properties sold during the year to unrelated parties , or classified as held-for-sale at the end of the period , are required to be classified as discontinued operations . the property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues , rental expenses , real estate taxes , allocated interest expense and depreciation expense , as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties . the operations of 150 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations . these 150 buildings consist of 114 office , 30 industrial , four retail , and two medical office properties . as a result , we classified operating losses , before gain on sales , of $ 1.5 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 7.1 million in discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . of these properties , 28 were sold during 2012 , 101 properties were sold during 2011 and 19 properties were sold during 2010 . the gains on disposal of these properties of $ 13.5 million , $ 100.9 million and $ 33.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and .
Question: what were the general and administrative expenses in 2012?
Answer: 46.4
Question: and what were they in 2011?
Answer: 43.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 3.3
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2011 expenses?
Answer: 0.07657
Question: in that same period, what was the increase in the interest expense allocable to continuing operations?
Answer: 24.7
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of that interest expense in 2011?
| 0.11202 |
CONVFINQA8993 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>5/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>q</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 143</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 114</td><td>$ 127</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ 138</td></tr></table> item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .
Question: what was the value of the peer group less 100?
| 43.0 |
CONVFINQA8994 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>5/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>q</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 143</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 114</td><td>$ 127</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ 138</td></tr></table> item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .
Question: what was the value of the peer group less 100?
Answer: 43.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.43 |
CONVFINQA8995 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .
Question: what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?
| 2556.0 |
CONVFINQA8996 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .
Question: what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 2556.0
Question: what is the average?
| 1278.0 |
CONVFINQA8997 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .
Question: what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 2556.0
Question: what is the average?
Answer: 1278.0
Question: what about the sum of balances of outstanding shares for december 2008 and december 2009?
| 2389.0 |
CONVFINQA8998 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .
Question: what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 2556.0
Question: what is the average?
Answer: 1278.0
Question: what about the sum of balances of outstanding shares for december 2008 and december 2009?
Answer: 2389.0
Question: what about the average for these years?
| 1194.5 |
CONVFINQA8999 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what is the net periodic pension cost in 2013?
| 111.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.