id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA9000 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what is the net periodic pension cost in 2013?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
| 89.0 |
CONVFINQA9001 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what is the net periodic pension cost in 2013?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 89.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 22.0 |
CONVFINQA9002 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what is the net periodic pension cost in 2013?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 89.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 22.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
| 89.0 |
CONVFINQA9003 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what is the net periodic pension cost in 2013?
Answer: 111.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 89.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 22.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
Answer: 89.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2012 value?
| 0.24719 |
CONVFINQA9004 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we had a working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position , which provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 6161</td><td>$ 5873</td><td>$ 4105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td><td>-3119 ( 3119 )</td><td>-2488 ( 2488 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-2682 ( 2682 )</td><td>-2623 ( 2623 )</td><td>-2381 ( 2381 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cashequivalents</td><td>$ -154 ( 154 )</td><td>$ 131</td><td>$ -764 ( 764 )</td></tr></table> operating activities higher net income in 2012 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2011 , partially offset by lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as explained below ) and payments for past wages based on national labor negotiations settled earlier this year . higher net income and lower cash income tax payments in 2011 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2010 . the tax relief , unemployment insurance reauthorization , and job creation act of 2010 provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 , and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 . as a result of the act , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011 income tax expense . this deferral decreased 2011 income tax payments , thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow . in future years , however , additional cash will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred . in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 . investing activities higher capital investments in 2012 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2011 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . higher capital investments partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales in 2011 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2010. .
Question: what is the value of the early buyout of locomotives, times 1000000?
| 75000000.0 |
CONVFINQA9005 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we had a working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position , which provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 6161</td><td>$ 5873</td><td>$ 4105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td><td>-3119 ( 3119 )</td><td>-2488 ( 2488 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-2682 ( 2682 )</td><td>-2623 ( 2623 )</td><td>-2381 ( 2381 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cashequivalents</td><td>$ -154 ( 154 )</td><td>$ 131</td><td>$ -764 ( 764 )</td></tr></table> operating activities higher net income in 2012 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2011 , partially offset by lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as explained below ) and payments for past wages based on national labor negotiations settled earlier this year . higher net income and lower cash income tax payments in 2011 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2010 . the tax relief , unemployment insurance reauthorization , and job creation act of 2010 provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 , and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 . as a result of the act , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011 income tax expense . this deferral decreased 2011 income tax payments , thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow . in future years , however , additional cash will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred . in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 . investing activities higher capital investments in 2012 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2011 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . higher capital investments partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales in 2011 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2010. .
Question: what is the value of the early buyout of locomotives, times 1000000?
Answer: 75000000.0
Question: what is that divided by the number of locomotives?
| 454545.45455 |
CONVFINQA9006 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
products and software , as well as ongoing investment in next-generation technologies , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . reorganization of business charges increased due to employee severance costs and expenses related to the exit of a facility . sg&a expenses decreased , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , partially offset by increased expenditures on information technology upgrades . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin and operating margin decreased , and sg&a expenses and r&d expenditures increased . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 647 million at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2006 . this decrease in backlog was primarily due to a decline in customer demand driven by the segment 2019s limited product portfolio . the segment shipped 159.1 million units in 2007 , a 27% ( 27 % ) decrease compared to shipments of 217.4 million units in 2006 . the overall decrease reflects decreased unit shipments of products for all technologies . for the full year 2007 , unit shipments : ( i ) decreased substantially in asia and emea , ( ii ) decreased in north america , and ( iii ) increased in latin america . although unit shipments by the segment decreased in 2007 , total unit shipments in the worldwide handset market increased by approximately 16% ( 16 % ) . the segment estimates its worldwide market share was approximately 14% ( 14 % ) for the full year 2007 , a decrease of approximately 8 percentage points versus full year 2006 . in 2007 , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) compared to 2006 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the product-tier and geographic mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 and 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which account for approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 54% ( 54 % ) of our segment 2019s 2007 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video delivery systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201cnetwork business 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2008 20142007</td><td>2007 20142006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) to $ 10.1 billion , compared to $ 10.0 billion in 2007 . the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales primarily reflects a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by an 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business . the 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business is primarily driven by a 17% ( 17 % ) increase in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting a 19% ( 19 % ) increase in unit shipments to 18.0 million units , partially offset by lower asp due to product mix shift and pricing pressure . the 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by : ( i ) the absence of net sales by the embedded communication computing group ( 201cecc 201d ) that was divested at the end of 2007 , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden , gsm and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of umts infrastructure equipment . on a geographic basis , the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in latin america and asia , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . the increase in net sales in latin america was 63management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 066000000 ***%%pcmsg|63 |00024|yes|no|02/24/2009 12:31|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what is 21% of the 2006 segment net sales?
| 1924.44 |
CONVFINQA9007 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
products and software , as well as ongoing investment in next-generation technologies , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . reorganization of business charges increased due to employee severance costs and expenses related to the exit of a facility . sg&a expenses decreased , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , partially offset by increased expenditures on information technology upgrades . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin and operating margin decreased , and sg&a expenses and r&d expenditures increased . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 647 million at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2006 . this decrease in backlog was primarily due to a decline in customer demand driven by the segment 2019s limited product portfolio . the segment shipped 159.1 million units in 2007 , a 27% ( 27 % ) decrease compared to shipments of 217.4 million units in 2006 . the overall decrease reflects decreased unit shipments of products for all technologies . for the full year 2007 , unit shipments : ( i ) decreased substantially in asia and emea , ( ii ) decreased in north america , and ( iii ) increased in latin america . although unit shipments by the segment decreased in 2007 , total unit shipments in the worldwide handset market increased by approximately 16% ( 16 % ) . the segment estimates its worldwide market share was approximately 14% ( 14 % ) for the full year 2007 , a decrease of approximately 8 percentage points versus full year 2006 . in 2007 , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) compared to 2006 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the product-tier and geographic mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 and 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which account for approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 54% ( 54 % ) of our segment 2019s 2007 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video delivery systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201cnetwork business 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2008 20142007</td><td>2007 20142006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) to $ 10.1 billion , compared to $ 10.0 billion in 2007 . the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales primarily reflects a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by an 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business . the 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business is primarily driven by a 17% ( 17 % ) increase in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting a 19% ( 19 % ) increase in unit shipments to 18.0 million units , partially offset by lower asp due to product mix shift and pricing pressure . the 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by : ( i ) the absence of net sales by the embedded communication computing group ( 201cecc 201d ) that was divested at the end of 2007 , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden , gsm and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of umts infrastructure equipment . on a geographic basis , the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in latin america and asia , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . the increase in net sales in latin america was 63management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 066000000 ***%%pcmsg|63 |00024|yes|no|02/24/2009 12:31|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what is 21% of the 2006 segment net sales?
Answer: 1924.44
Question: what is 33% of the 2008 segment net sales?
| 3328.38 |
CONVFINQA9008 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
products and software , as well as ongoing investment in next-generation technologies , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . reorganization of business charges increased due to employee severance costs and expenses related to the exit of a facility . sg&a expenses decreased , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , partially offset by increased expenditures on information technology upgrades . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin and operating margin decreased , and sg&a expenses and r&d expenditures increased . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 647 million at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2006 . this decrease in backlog was primarily due to a decline in customer demand driven by the segment 2019s limited product portfolio . the segment shipped 159.1 million units in 2007 , a 27% ( 27 % ) decrease compared to shipments of 217.4 million units in 2006 . the overall decrease reflects decreased unit shipments of products for all technologies . for the full year 2007 , unit shipments : ( i ) decreased substantially in asia and emea , ( ii ) decreased in north america , and ( iii ) increased in latin america . although unit shipments by the segment decreased in 2007 , total unit shipments in the worldwide handset market increased by approximately 16% ( 16 % ) . the segment estimates its worldwide market share was approximately 14% ( 14 % ) for the full year 2007 , a decrease of approximately 8 percentage points versus full year 2006 . in 2007 , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) compared to 2006 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the product-tier and geographic mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 and 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which account for approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 54% ( 54 % ) of our segment 2019s 2007 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video delivery systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201cnetwork business 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2008 20142007</td><td>2007 20142006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) to $ 10.1 billion , compared to $ 10.0 billion in 2007 . the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales primarily reflects a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by an 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business . the 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business is primarily driven by a 17% ( 17 % ) increase in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting a 19% ( 19 % ) increase in unit shipments to 18.0 million units , partially offset by lower asp due to product mix shift and pricing pressure . the 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by : ( i ) the absence of net sales by the embedded communication computing group ( 201cecc 201d ) that was divested at the end of 2007 , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden , gsm and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of umts infrastructure equipment . on a geographic basis , the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in latin america and asia , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . the increase in net sales in latin america was 63management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 066000000 ***%%pcmsg|63 |00024|yes|no|02/24/2009 12:31|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what is 21% of the 2006 segment net sales?
Answer: 1924.44
Question: what is 33% of the 2008 segment net sales?
Answer: 3328.38
Question: what is the difference?
| 1403.94 |
CONVFINQA9009 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
products and software , as well as ongoing investment in next-generation technologies , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . reorganization of business charges increased due to employee severance costs and expenses related to the exit of a facility . sg&a expenses decreased , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , partially offset by increased expenditures on information technology upgrades . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin and operating margin decreased , and sg&a expenses and r&d expenditures increased . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 647 million at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2006 . this decrease in backlog was primarily due to a decline in customer demand driven by the segment 2019s limited product portfolio . the segment shipped 159.1 million units in 2007 , a 27% ( 27 % ) decrease compared to shipments of 217.4 million units in 2006 . the overall decrease reflects decreased unit shipments of products for all technologies . for the full year 2007 , unit shipments : ( i ) decreased substantially in asia and emea , ( ii ) decreased in north america , and ( iii ) increased in latin america . although unit shipments by the segment decreased in 2007 , total unit shipments in the worldwide handset market increased by approximately 16% ( 16 % ) . the segment estimates its worldwide market share was approximately 14% ( 14 % ) for the full year 2007 , a decrease of approximately 8 percentage points versus full year 2006 . in 2007 , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) compared to 2006 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the product-tier and geographic mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 and 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which account for approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 54% ( 54 % ) of our segment 2019s 2007 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video delivery systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201cnetwork business 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2008 20142007</td><td>2007 20142006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) to $ 10.1 billion , compared to $ 10.0 billion in 2007 . the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales primarily reflects a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by an 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business . the 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business is primarily driven by a 17% ( 17 % ) increase in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting a 19% ( 19 % ) increase in unit shipments to 18.0 million units , partially offset by lower asp due to product mix shift and pricing pressure . the 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by : ( i ) the absence of net sales by the embedded communication computing group ( 201cecc 201d ) that was divested at the end of 2007 , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden , gsm and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of umts infrastructure equipment . on a geographic basis , the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in latin america and asia , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . the increase in net sales in latin america was 63management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 066000000 ***%%pcmsg|63 |00024|yes|no|02/24/2009 12:31|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what is 21% of the 2006 segment net sales?
Answer: 1924.44
Question: what is 33% of the 2008 segment net sales?
Answer: 3328.38
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 1403.94
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.72953 |
CONVFINQA9010 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 international . in general , our international markets are less advanced with respect to the current technologies deployed for wireless services . as a result , demand for our communications sites is driven by continued voice network investments , new market entrants and initial 3g data network deployments . for example , in india , nationwide voice networks continue to be deployed as wireless service providers are beginning their initial investments in 3g data networks , as a result of recent spectrum auctions . in mexico and brazil , where nationwide voice networks have been deployed , some incumbent wireless service providers continue to invest in their 3g data networks , and recent spectrum auctions have enabled other incumbent wireless service providers and new market entrants to begin their initial investments in 3g data networks . in markets such as chile and peru , recent spectrum auctions have attracted new market entrants , who are expected to begin their investment in deploying nationwide voice and 3g data networks . we believe demand for our tower sites will continue in our international markets as wireless service providers seek to remain competitive by increasing the coverage of their networks while also investing in next generation data networks . rental and management operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , we grew our portfolio of communications sites through acquisitions and construction activities , including the acquisition and construction of approximately 7800 sites . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire larger communications site portfolios , both domestically and internationally , that we believe we can effectively integrate into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>domestic</td><td>947</td><td>528</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international ( 1 )</td><td>6865</td><td>3022</td><td>801</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the majority of sites acquired or constructed internationally during 2010 and 2009 were in india and our newly launched operations in chile , colombia and peru . network development services segment revenue growth . as we continue to focus on growing our rental and management operations , we anticipate that our network development services revenue will continue to represent a small percentage of our total revenues . through our network development services segment , we offer tower-related services , including site acquisition , zoning and permitting services and structural analysis services , which primarily support our site leasing business and the addition of new tenants and equipment on our sites . rental and management operations expenses . our rental and management operations expenses include our direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent , property taxes , repairs and maintenance and utilities . these segment level expenses exclude all segment and corporate level selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense . in general , our rental and management segment level selling , general and administrative expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . in geographic areas where we have recently launched operations or are focused on materially expanding our site footprint , we may incur additional segment level selling , general and administrative expenses as we increase our presence in these areas . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our legacy sites and can be temporarily diluted by our development activities . reit election . as we review our tax strategy and assess the utilization of our federal and state nols , we are actively considering an election to a reit for u.s . federal and , where applicable , state income tax purposes . we may make the determination to elect reit status for the taxable year beginning january 1 , 2012 , as early as the second half of 2011 , subject to the approval of our board of directors , although there is no certainty as to the timing of a reit election or whether we will make a reit election at all. .
Question: what was the total number of new sites in 2010?
| 7812.0 |
CONVFINQA9011 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 international . in general , our international markets are less advanced with respect to the current technologies deployed for wireless services . as a result , demand for our communications sites is driven by continued voice network investments , new market entrants and initial 3g data network deployments . for example , in india , nationwide voice networks continue to be deployed as wireless service providers are beginning their initial investments in 3g data networks , as a result of recent spectrum auctions . in mexico and brazil , where nationwide voice networks have been deployed , some incumbent wireless service providers continue to invest in their 3g data networks , and recent spectrum auctions have enabled other incumbent wireless service providers and new market entrants to begin their initial investments in 3g data networks . in markets such as chile and peru , recent spectrum auctions have attracted new market entrants , who are expected to begin their investment in deploying nationwide voice and 3g data networks . we believe demand for our tower sites will continue in our international markets as wireless service providers seek to remain competitive by increasing the coverage of their networks while also investing in next generation data networks . rental and management operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , we grew our portfolio of communications sites through acquisitions and construction activities , including the acquisition and construction of approximately 7800 sites . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire larger communications site portfolios , both domestically and internationally , that we believe we can effectively integrate into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>domestic</td><td>947</td><td>528</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international ( 1 )</td><td>6865</td><td>3022</td><td>801</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the majority of sites acquired or constructed internationally during 2010 and 2009 were in india and our newly launched operations in chile , colombia and peru . network development services segment revenue growth . as we continue to focus on growing our rental and management operations , we anticipate that our network development services revenue will continue to represent a small percentage of our total revenues . through our network development services segment , we offer tower-related services , including site acquisition , zoning and permitting services and structural analysis services , which primarily support our site leasing business and the addition of new tenants and equipment on our sites . rental and management operations expenses . our rental and management operations expenses include our direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent , property taxes , repairs and maintenance and utilities . these segment level expenses exclude all segment and corporate level selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense . in general , our rental and management segment level selling , general and administrative expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . in geographic areas where we have recently launched operations or are focused on materially expanding our site footprint , we may incur additional segment level selling , general and administrative expenses as we increase our presence in these areas . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our legacy sites and can be temporarily diluted by our development activities . reit election . as we review our tax strategy and assess the utilization of our federal and state nols , we are actively considering an election to a reit for u.s . federal and , where applicable , state income tax purposes . we may make the determination to elect reit status for the taxable year beginning january 1 , 2012 , as early as the second half of 2011 , subject to the approval of our board of directors , although there is no certainty as to the timing of a reit election or whether we will make a reit election at all. .
Question: what was the total number of new sites in 2010?
Answer: 7812.0
Question: and specifically the amount domestically?
| 947.0 |
CONVFINQA9012 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 international . in general , our international markets are less advanced with respect to the current technologies deployed for wireless services . as a result , demand for our communications sites is driven by continued voice network investments , new market entrants and initial 3g data network deployments . for example , in india , nationwide voice networks continue to be deployed as wireless service providers are beginning their initial investments in 3g data networks , as a result of recent spectrum auctions . in mexico and brazil , where nationwide voice networks have been deployed , some incumbent wireless service providers continue to invest in their 3g data networks , and recent spectrum auctions have enabled other incumbent wireless service providers and new market entrants to begin their initial investments in 3g data networks . in markets such as chile and peru , recent spectrum auctions have attracted new market entrants , who are expected to begin their investment in deploying nationwide voice and 3g data networks . we believe demand for our tower sites will continue in our international markets as wireless service providers seek to remain competitive by increasing the coverage of their networks while also investing in next generation data networks . rental and management operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , we grew our portfolio of communications sites through acquisitions and construction activities , including the acquisition and construction of approximately 7800 sites . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire larger communications site portfolios , both domestically and internationally , that we believe we can effectively integrate into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>domestic</td><td>947</td><td>528</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international ( 1 )</td><td>6865</td><td>3022</td><td>801</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the majority of sites acquired or constructed internationally during 2010 and 2009 were in india and our newly launched operations in chile , colombia and peru . network development services segment revenue growth . as we continue to focus on growing our rental and management operations , we anticipate that our network development services revenue will continue to represent a small percentage of our total revenues . through our network development services segment , we offer tower-related services , including site acquisition , zoning and permitting services and structural analysis services , which primarily support our site leasing business and the addition of new tenants and equipment on our sites . rental and management operations expenses . our rental and management operations expenses include our direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent , property taxes , repairs and maintenance and utilities . these segment level expenses exclude all segment and corporate level selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense . in general , our rental and management segment level selling , general and administrative expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . in geographic areas where we have recently launched operations or are focused on materially expanding our site footprint , we may incur additional segment level selling , general and administrative expenses as we increase our presence in these areas . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our legacy sites and can be temporarily diluted by our development activities . reit election . as we review our tax strategy and assess the utilization of our federal and state nols , we are actively considering an election to a reit for u.s . federal and , where applicable , state income tax purposes . we may make the determination to elect reit status for the taxable year beginning january 1 , 2012 , as early as the second half of 2011 , subject to the approval of our board of directors , although there is no certainty as to the timing of a reit election or whether we will make a reit election at all. .
Question: what was the total number of new sites in 2010?
Answer: 7812.0
Question: and specifically the amount domestically?
Answer: 947.0
Question: and as a percentage of the total?
| 0.12122 |
CONVFINQA9013 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 15 . commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . in addition to product warranties , the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . the company enters into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions . under these provisions the company generally indemnifies and holds harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of its activities . these indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement . the maximum potential amount of future payments the company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited . abiomed has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements . as a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal . accordingly , the company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2008 . clinical study agreements 2014in the company 2019s clinical study agreements , abiomed has agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to uses of the company 2019s devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and abiomed 2019s instructions . the indemnification provisions contained within the company 2019s clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in its clinical study agreements . facilities leases 2014as of march 31 , 2008 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts with terms through fiscal 2010 . the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values . the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in december 2012 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 2.2 million , $ 1.6 million , and $ 1.3 million for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2008 are approximately as follows : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ending march 31,</td><td>operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>2544</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>2220</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1287</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>730</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 7754</td></tr></table> litigation 2014from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results. .
Question: what is the value of operating leases in 2010?
| 2220.0 |
CONVFINQA9014 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 15 . commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . in addition to product warranties , the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . the company enters into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions . under these provisions the company generally indemnifies and holds harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of its activities . these indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement . the maximum potential amount of future payments the company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited . abiomed has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements . as a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal . accordingly , the company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2008 . clinical study agreements 2014in the company 2019s clinical study agreements , abiomed has agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to uses of the company 2019s devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and abiomed 2019s instructions . the indemnification provisions contained within the company 2019s clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in its clinical study agreements . facilities leases 2014as of march 31 , 2008 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts with terms through fiscal 2010 . the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values . the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in december 2012 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 2.2 million , $ 1.6 million , and $ 1.3 million for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2008 are approximately as follows : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ending march 31,</td><td>operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>2544</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>2220</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1287</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>730</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 7754</td></tr></table> litigation 2014from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results. .
Question: what is the value of operating leases in 2010?
Answer: 2220.0
Question: what was the value in 2009?
| 2544.0 |
CONVFINQA9015 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 15 . commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . in addition to product warranties , the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . the company enters into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions . under these provisions the company generally indemnifies and holds harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of its activities . these indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement . the maximum potential amount of future payments the company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited . abiomed has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements . as a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal . accordingly , the company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2008 . clinical study agreements 2014in the company 2019s clinical study agreements , abiomed has agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to uses of the company 2019s devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and abiomed 2019s instructions . the indemnification provisions contained within the company 2019s clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in its clinical study agreements . facilities leases 2014as of march 31 , 2008 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts with terms through fiscal 2010 . the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values . the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in december 2012 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 2.2 million , $ 1.6 million , and $ 1.3 million for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2008 are approximately as follows : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ending march 31,</td><td>operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>2544</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>2220</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1287</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>730</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 7754</td></tr></table> litigation 2014from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results. .
Question: what is the value of operating leases in 2010?
Answer: 2220.0
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 2544.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -324.0 |
CONVFINQA9016 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 15 . commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . in addition to product warranties , the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . the company enters into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions . under these provisions the company generally indemnifies and holds harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of its activities . these indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement . the maximum potential amount of future payments the company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited . abiomed has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements . as a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal . accordingly , the company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2008 . clinical study agreements 2014in the company 2019s clinical study agreements , abiomed has agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to uses of the company 2019s devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and abiomed 2019s instructions . the indemnification provisions contained within the company 2019s clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in its clinical study agreements . facilities leases 2014as of march 31 , 2008 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts with terms through fiscal 2010 . the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values . the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in december 2012 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 2.2 million , $ 1.6 million , and $ 1.3 million for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2008 are approximately as follows : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ending march 31,</td><td>operating leases ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>2544</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>2220</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1287</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>730</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 7754</td></tr></table> litigation 2014from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results. .
Question: what is the value of operating leases in 2010?
Answer: 2220.0
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 2544.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -324.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2009 value?
| -0.12736 |
CONVFINQA9017 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .
Question: what portion of the future minimum commitments is due in 12 months?
| 0.1368 |
CONVFINQA9018 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .
Question: what portion of the future minimum commitments is due in 12 months?
Answer: 0.1368
Question: what is the value of the fund for various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment?
| 192.0 |
CONVFINQA9019 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .
Question: what portion of the future minimum commitments is due in 12 months?
Answer: 0.1368
Question: what is the value of the fund for various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment?
Answer: 192.0
Question: what is the total minimum future commitments as of 31 december 2016?
| 1038.0 |
CONVFINQA9020 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .
Question: what portion of the future minimum commitments is due in 12 months?
Answer: 0.1368
Question: what is the value of the fund for various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment?
Answer: 192.0
Question: what is the total minimum future commitments as of 31 december 2016?
Answer: 1038.0
Question: what proportion does this represent?
| 0.18497 |
CONVFINQA9021 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td><td>foreign</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 503</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>2014</td><td>331315</td><td>5509</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>774209</td><td>576780</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2026 to 2030</td><td>423398</td><td>279908</td><td>92412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1197607</td><td>$ 1188003</td><td>$ 98424</td></tr></table> in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .
Question: what was the total value of federal operating loss carryforwards?
| 1197607.0 |
CONVFINQA9022 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td><td>foreign</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 503</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>2014</td><td>331315</td><td>5509</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>774209</td><td>576780</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2026 to 2030</td><td>423398</td><td>279908</td><td>92412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1197607</td><td>$ 1188003</td><td>$ 98424</td></tr></table> in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .
Question: what was the total value of federal operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 1197607.0
Question: what was the total value of state operating loss carryforwards?
| 1188003.0 |
CONVFINQA9023 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td><td>foreign</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 503</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>2014</td><td>331315</td><td>5509</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>774209</td><td>576780</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2026 to 2030</td><td>423398</td><td>279908</td><td>92412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1197607</td><td>$ 1188003</td><td>$ 98424</td></tr></table> in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .
Question: what was the total value of federal operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 1197607.0
Question: what was the total value of state operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 1188003.0
Question: what is the sum of federal and state operating loss carryforwards?
| 2385610.0 |
CONVFINQA9024 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td><td>foreign</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 503</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>2014</td><td>331315</td><td>5509</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>774209</td><td>576780</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2026 to 2030</td><td>423398</td><td>279908</td><td>92412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1197607</td><td>$ 1188003</td><td>$ 98424</td></tr></table> in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .
Question: what was the total value of federal operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 1197607.0
Question: what was the total value of state operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 1188003.0
Question: what is the sum of federal and state operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 2385610.0
Question: what is the sum of federal, state, and foreign operating loss carryforwards?
| 2484034.0 |
CONVFINQA9025 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .
Question: what was the change in net sales for mst from 2012 to 2013?
| -426.0 |
CONVFINQA9026 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .
Question: what was the change in net sales for mst from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: -426.0
Question: and what was the total of net sales in 2012?
| 7579.0 |
CONVFINQA9027 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .
Question: what was the change in net sales for mst from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: -426.0
Question: and what was the total of net sales in 2012?
Answer: 7579.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this total?
| -0.05621 |
CONVFINQA9028 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a e s 2 0 0 0 f i n a n c i a l r e v i e w in may 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired an additional 5% ( 5 % ) of the preferred , non-voting shares of eletropaulo for approximately $ 90 million . in january 2000 , 59% ( 59 % ) of the preferred non-voting shares were acquired for approximately $ 1 billion at auction from bndes , the national development bank of brazil . the price established at auction was approximately $ 72.18 per 1000 shares , to be paid in four annual installments com- mencing with a payment of 18.5% ( 18.5 % ) of the total price upon closing of the transaction and installments of 25.9% ( 25.9 % ) , 27.1% ( 27.1 % ) and 28.5% ( 28.5 % ) of the total price to be paid annually thereafter . at december 31 , 2000 , the company had a total economic interest of 49.6% ( 49.6 % ) in eletropaulo . the company accounts for this investment using the equity method based on the related consortium agreement that allows the exercise of significant influence . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited for approxi- mately $ 40 million . songas limited owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . under the terms of a project management agreement , the company has assumed overall project management responsibility . the project consists of the refurbishment and operation of five natural gas wells in coastal tanzania , the construction and operation of a 65 mmscf/day gas processing plant and related facilities , the construction of a 230 km marine and land pipeline from the gas plant to dar es salaam and the conversion and upgrading of an existing 112 mw power station in dar es salaam to burn natural gas , with an optional additional unit to be constructed at the plant . since the project is currently under construction , no rev- enues or expenses have been incurred , and therefore no results are shown in the following table . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company with edf international s.a . ( 201cedf 201d ) completed the acquisition of an additional 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) interest in light from two sub- sidiaries of reliant energy for approximately $ 136 mil- lion . pursuant to the acquisition , the company acquired 30% ( 30 % ) of the shares while edf acquired the remainder . with the completion of this transaction , the company owns approximately 21.14% ( 21.14 % ) of light . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company entered into an agreement with edf to jointly acquire an additional 9.2% ( 9.2 % ) interest in light , which is held by a sub- sidiary of companhia siderurgica nacional ( 201ccsn 201d ) . pursuant to this transaction , the company acquired an additional 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) interest in light for $ 114.6 million . this transaction closed in january 2001 . following the purchase of the light shares previously owned by csn , aes and edf will together be the con- trolling shareholders of light and eletropaulo . aes and edf have agreed that aes will eventually take operational control of eletropaulo and the telecom businesses of light and eletropaulo , while edf will eventually take opera- tional control of light and eletropaulo 2019s electric workshop business . aes and edf intend to continue to pursue a fur- ther rationalization of their ownership stakes in light and eletropaulo , the result of which aes would become the sole controlling shareholder of eletropaulo and edf would become the sole controlling shareholder of light . upon consummation of the transaction , aes will begin consolidating eletropaulo 2019s operating results . the struc- ture and process by which this rationalization may be effected , and the resulting timing , have yet to be deter- mined and will likely be subject to approval by various brazilian regulatory authorities and other third parties . as a result , there can be no assurance that this rationalization will take place . in may 1999 , a subsidiary of the company acquired subscription rights from the brazilian state-controlled eletrobras which allowed it to purchase preferred , non- voting shares in eletropaulo and common shares in light . the aggregate purchase price of the subscription rights and the underlying shares in light and eletropaulo was approximately $ 53 million and $ 77 million , respectively , and represented 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) economic ownership interest in their capital stock , respectively . the following table presents summarized financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2000</td><td>1999</td><td>1998</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 6241</td><td>$ 5960</td><td>$ 8091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1989</td><td>1839</td><td>2079</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>859</td><td>62</td><td>1146</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>2423</td><td>2259</td><td>2712</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>13080</td><td>15359</td><td>19025</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>3370</td><td>3637</td><td>4809</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>5927</td><td>7536</td><td>7356</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>6206</td><td>6445</td><td>9572</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in revenue from 1998 to 1999?
| -2131.0 |
CONVFINQA9029 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a e s 2 0 0 0 f i n a n c i a l r e v i e w in may 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired an additional 5% ( 5 % ) of the preferred , non-voting shares of eletropaulo for approximately $ 90 million . in january 2000 , 59% ( 59 % ) of the preferred non-voting shares were acquired for approximately $ 1 billion at auction from bndes , the national development bank of brazil . the price established at auction was approximately $ 72.18 per 1000 shares , to be paid in four annual installments com- mencing with a payment of 18.5% ( 18.5 % ) of the total price upon closing of the transaction and installments of 25.9% ( 25.9 % ) , 27.1% ( 27.1 % ) and 28.5% ( 28.5 % ) of the total price to be paid annually thereafter . at december 31 , 2000 , the company had a total economic interest of 49.6% ( 49.6 % ) in eletropaulo . the company accounts for this investment using the equity method based on the related consortium agreement that allows the exercise of significant influence . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited for approxi- mately $ 40 million . songas limited owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . under the terms of a project management agreement , the company has assumed overall project management responsibility . the project consists of the refurbishment and operation of five natural gas wells in coastal tanzania , the construction and operation of a 65 mmscf/day gas processing plant and related facilities , the construction of a 230 km marine and land pipeline from the gas plant to dar es salaam and the conversion and upgrading of an existing 112 mw power station in dar es salaam to burn natural gas , with an optional additional unit to be constructed at the plant . since the project is currently under construction , no rev- enues or expenses have been incurred , and therefore no results are shown in the following table . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company with edf international s.a . ( 201cedf 201d ) completed the acquisition of an additional 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) interest in light from two sub- sidiaries of reliant energy for approximately $ 136 mil- lion . pursuant to the acquisition , the company acquired 30% ( 30 % ) of the shares while edf acquired the remainder . with the completion of this transaction , the company owns approximately 21.14% ( 21.14 % ) of light . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company entered into an agreement with edf to jointly acquire an additional 9.2% ( 9.2 % ) interest in light , which is held by a sub- sidiary of companhia siderurgica nacional ( 201ccsn 201d ) . pursuant to this transaction , the company acquired an additional 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) interest in light for $ 114.6 million . this transaction closed in january 2001 . following the purchase of the light shares previously owned by csn , aes and edf will together be the con- trolling shareholders of light and eletropaulo . aes and edf have agreed that aes will eventually take operational control of eletropaulo and the telecom businesses of light and eletropaulo , while edf will eventually take opera- tional control of light and eletropaulo 2019s electric workshop business . aes and edf intend to continue to pursue a fur- ther rationalization of their ownership stakes in light and eletropaulo , the result of which aes would become the sole controlling shareholder of eletropaulo and edf would become the sole controlling shareholder of light . upon consummation of the transaction , aes will begin consolidating eletropaulo 2019s operating results . the struc- ture and process by which this rationalization may be effected , and the resulting timing , have yet to be deter- mined and will likely be subject to approval by various brazilian regulatory authorities and other third parties . as a result , there can be no assurance that this rationalization will take place . in may 1999 , a subsidiary of the company acquired subscription rights from the brazilian state-controlled eletrobras which allowed it to purchase preferred , non- voting shares in eletropaulo and common shares in light . the aggregate purchase price of the subscription rights and the underlying shares in light and eletropaulo was approximately $ 53 million and $ 77 million , respectively , and represented 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) economic ownership interest in their capital stock , respectively . the following table presents summarized financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2000</td><td>1999</td><td>1998</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 6241</td><td>$ 5960</td><td>$ 8091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1989</td><td>1839</td><td>2079</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>859</td><td>62</td><td>1146</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>2423</td><td>2259</td><td>2712</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>13080</td><td>15359</td><td>19025</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>3370</td><td>3637</td><td>4809</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>5927</td><td>7536</td><td>7356</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>6206</td><td>6445</td><td>9572</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in revenue from 1998 to 1999?
Answer: -2131.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.26338 |
CONVFINQA9030 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) operations , net , in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . ( see note 9. ) other transactions 2014in august 2003 , the company consummated the sale of galaxy engineering ( galaxy ) , a radio frequency engineering , network design and tower-related consulting business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 3.5 million included $ 2.0 million in cash , which the company received at closing , and an additional $ 1.5 million payable on january 15 , 2008 , or at an earlier date based on the future revenues of galaxy . the company received $ 0.5 million of this amount in january 2005 . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 2.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in may 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in westwood , massachusetts ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for a purchase price of approximately $ 18.5 million , including $ 2.4 million of cash proceeds and the buyer 2019s assumption of $ 16.1 million of related mortgage notes . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in january 2003 , the company consummated the sale of flash technologies , its remaining components business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) for approximately $ 35.5 million in cash and has recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in march 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in schaumburg , illinois ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for net proceeds of approximately $ 10.3 million in cash and recorded a net loss on disposal of $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . 4 . property and equipment property and equipment ( including assets held under capital leases ) consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>towers</td><td>$ 4134155</td><td>$ 2788162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equipment</td><td>167504</td><td>115244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings and improvements</td><td>184951</td><td>162120</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>land and improvements</td><td>215974</td><td>176937</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>construction-in-progress</td><td>36991</td><td>27866</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>4739575</td><td>3270329</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-1279049 ( 1279049 )</td><td>-996973 ( 996973 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>$ 3460526</td><td>$ 2273356</td></tr></table> 5 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company 2019s net carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $ 2.1 billion as of december 312005 and $ 592.7 million as of december 31 , 2004 , all of which related to its rental and management segment . the increase in the carrying value was as a result of the goodwill of $ 1.5 billion acquired in the merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) .
Question: what was the amount of property and equipment net in 2005?
| 3460526.0 |
CONVFINQA9031 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) operations , net , in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . ( see note 9. ) other transactions 2014in august 2003 , the company consummated the sale of galaxy engineering ( galaxy ) , a radio frequency engineering , network design and tower-related consulting business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 3.5 million included $ 2.0 million in cash , which the company received at closing , and an additional $ 1.5 million payable on january 15 , 2008 , or at an earlier date based on the future revenues of galaxy . the company received $ 0.5 million of this amount in january 2005 . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 2.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in may 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in westwood , massachusetts ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for a purchase price of approximately $ 18.5 million , including $ 2.4 million of cash proceeds and the buyer 2019s assumption of $ 16.1 million of related mortgage notes . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in january 2003 , the company consummated the sale of flash technologies , its remaining components business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) for approximately $ 35.5 million in cash and has recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in march 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in schaumburg , illinois ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for net proceeds of approximately $ 10.3 million in cash and recorded a net loss on disposal of $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . 4 . property and equipment property and equipment ( including assets held under capital leases ) consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>towers</td><td>$ 4134155</td><td>$ 2788162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equipment</td><td>167504</td><td>115244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings and improvements</td><td>184951</td><td>162120</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>land and improvements</td><td>215974</td><td>176937</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>construction-in-progress</td><td>36991</td><td>27866</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>4739575</td><td>3270329</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-1279049 ( 1279049 )</td><td>-996973 ( 996973 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>$ 3460526</td><td>$ 2273356</td></tr></table> 5 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company 2019s net carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $ 2.1 billion as of december 312005 and $ 592.7 million as of december 31 , 2004 , all of which related to its rental and management segment . the increase in the carrying value was as a result of the goodwill of $ 1.5 billion acquired in the merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) .
Question: what was the amount of property and equipment net in 2005?
Answer: 3460526.0
Question: and what was it in 2004?
| 2273356.0 |
CONVFINQA9032 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) operations , net , in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . ( see note 9. ) other transactions 2014in august 2003 , the company consummated the sale of galaxy engineering ( galaxy ) , a radio frequency engineering , network design and tower-related consulting business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 3.5 million included $ 2.0 million in cash , which the company received at closing , and an additional $ 1.5 million payable on january 15 , 2008 , or at an earlier date based on the future revenues of galaxy . the company received $ 0.5 million of this amount in january 2005 . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 2.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in may 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in westwood , massachusetts ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for a purchase price of approximately $ 18.5 million , including $ 2.4 million of cash proceeds and the buyer 2019s assumption of $ 16.1 million of related mortgage notes . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in january 2003 , the company consummated the sale of flash technologies , its remaining components business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) for approximately $ 35.5 million in cash and has recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in march 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in schaumburg , illinois ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for net proceeds of approximately $ 10.3 million in cash and recorded a net loss on disposal of $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . 4 . property and equipment property and equipment ( including assets held under capital leases ) consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>towers</td><td>$ 4134155</td><td>$ 2788162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equipment</td><td>167504</td><td>115244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings and improvements</td><td>184951</td><td>162120</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>land and improvements</td><td>215974</td><td>176937</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>construction-in-progress</td><td>36991</td><td>27866</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>4739575</td><td>3270329</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-1279049 ( 1279049 )</td><td>-996973 ( 996973 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>$ 3460526</td><td>$ 2273356</td></tr></table> 5 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company 2019s net carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $ 2.1 billion as of december 312005 and $ 592.7 million as of december 31 , 2004 , all of which related to its rental and management segment . the increase in the carrying value was as a result of the goodwill of $ 1.5 billion acquired in the merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) .
Question: what was the amount of property and equipment net in 2005?
Answer: 3460526.0
Question: and what was it in 2004?
Answer: 2273356.0
Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?
| 1187170.0 |
CONVFINQA9033 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) operations , net , in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . ( see note 9. ) other transactions 2014in august 2003 , the company consummated the sale of galaxy engineering ( galaxy ) , a radio frequency engineering , network design and tower-related consulting business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 3.5 million included $ 2.0 million in cash , which the company received at closing , and an additional $ 1.5 million payable on january 15 , 2008 , or at an earlier date based on the future revenues of galaxy . the company received $ 0.5 million of this amount in january 2005 . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 2.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in may 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in westwood , massachusetts ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for a purchase price of approximately $ 18.5 million , including $ 2.4 million of cash proceeds and the buyer 2019s assumption of $ 16.1 million of related mortgage notes . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in january 2003 , the company consummated the sale of flash technologies , its remaining components business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) for approximately $ 35.5 million in cash and has recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in march 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in schaumburg , illinois ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for net proceeds of approximately $ 10.3 million in cash and recorded a net loss on disposal of $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . 4 . property and equipment property and equipment ( including assets held under capital leases ) consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>towers</td><td>$ 4134155</td><td>$ 2788162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equipment</td><td>167504</td><td>115244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings and improvements</td><td>184951</td><td>162120</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>land and improvements</td><td>215974</td><td>176937</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>construction-in-progress</td><td>36991</td><td>27866</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>4739575</td><td>3270329</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-1279049 ( 1279049 )</td><td>-996973 ( 996973 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>$ 3460526</td><td>$ 2273356</td></tr></table> 5 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company 2019s net carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $ 2.1 billion as of december 312005 and $ 592.7 million as of december 31 , 2004 , all of which related to its rental and management segment . the increase in the carrying value was as a result of the goodwill of $ 1.5 billion acquired in the merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) .
Question: what was the amount of property and equipment net in 2005?
Answer: 3460526.0
Question: and what was it in 2004?
Answer: 2273356.0
Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?
Answer: 1187170.0
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2004 amount?
| 0.52221 |
CONVFINQA9034 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) operations , net , in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . ( see note 9. ) other transactions 2014in august 2003 , the company consummated the sale of galaxy engineering ( galaxy ) , a radio frequency engineering , network design and tower-related consulting business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 3.5 million included $ 2.0 million in cash , which the company received at closing , and an additional $ 1.5 million payable on january 15 , 2008 , or at an earlier date based on the future revenues of galaxy . the company received $ 0.5 million of this amount in january 2005 . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 2.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in may 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in westwood , massachusetts ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for a purchase price of approximately $ 18.5 million , including $ 2.4 million of cash proceeds and the buyer 2019s assumption of $ 16.1 million of related mortgage notes . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in january 2003 , the company consummated the sale of flash technologies , its remaining components business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) for approximately $ 35.5 million in cash and has recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in march 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in schaumburg , illinois ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for net proceeds of approximately $ 10.3 million in cash and recorded a net loss on disposal of $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . 4 . property and equipment property and equipment ( including assets held under capital leases ) consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>towers</td><td>$ 4134155</td><td>$ 2788162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equipment</td><td>167504</td><td>115244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings and improvements</td><td>184951</td><td>162120</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>land and improvements</td><td>215974</td><td>176937</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>construction-in-progress</td><td>36991</td><td>27866</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>4739575</td><td>3270329</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-1279049 ( 1279049 )</td><td>-996973 ( 996973 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>$ 3460526</td><td>$ 2273356</td></tr></table> 5 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company 2019s net carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $ 2.1 billion as of december 312005 and $ 592.7 million as of december 31 , 2004 , all of which related to its rental and management segment . the increase in the carrying value was as a result of the goodwill of $ 1.5 billion acquired in the merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) .
Question: what was the amount of property and equipment net in 2005?
Answer: 3460526.0
Question: and what was it in 2004?
Answer: 2273356.0
Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?
Answer: 1187170.0
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2004 amount?
Answer: 0.52221
Question: and what was the increase in the amount of total property and equipment in that same period?
| 1469246.0 |
CONVFINQA9035 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) operations , net , in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . ( see note 9. ) other transactions 2014in august 2003 , the company consummated the sale of galaxy engineering ( galaxy ) , a radio frequency engineering , network design and tower-related consulting business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 3.5 million included $ 2.0 million in cash , which the company received at closing , and an additional $ 1.5 million payable on january 15 , 2008 , or at an earlier date based on the future revenues of galaxy . the company received $ 0.5 million of this amount in january 2005 . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 2.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in may 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in westwood , massachusetts ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for a purchase price of approximately $ 18.5 million , including $ 2.4 million of cash proceeds and the buyer 2019s assumption of $ 16.1 million of related mortgage notes . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in january 2003 , the company consummated the sale of flash technologies , its remaining components business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) for approximately $ 35.5 million in cash and has recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in march 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in schaumburg , illinois ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for net proceeds of approximately $ 10.3 million in cash and recorded a net loss on disposal of $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . 4 . property and equipment property and equipment ( including assets held under capital leases ) consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>towers</td><td>$ 4134155</td><td>$ 2788162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equipment</td><td>167504</td><td>115244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings and improvements</td><td>184951</td><td>162120</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>land and improvements</td><td>215974</td><td>176937</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>construction-in-progress</td><td>36991</td><td>27866</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>4739575</td><td>3270329</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-1279049 ( 1279049 )</td><td>-996973 ( 996973 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>$ 3460526</td><td>$ 2273356</td></tr></table> 5 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company 2019s net carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $ 2.1 billion as of december 312005 and $ 592.7 million as of december 31 , 2004 , all of which related to its rental and management segment . the increase in the carrying value was as a result of the goodwill of $ 1.5 billion acquired in the merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) .
Question: what was the amount of property and equipment net in 2005?
Answer: 3460526.0
Question: and what was it in 2004?
Answer: 2273356.0
Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?
Answer: 1187170.0
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2004 amount?
Answer: 0.52221
Question: and what was the increase in the amount of total property and equipment in that same period?
Answer: 1469246.0
Question: how much did this increase represent in relation to that amount in 2004, in percentage?
| 0.44927 |
CONVFINQA9036 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . the information required by item 12 is included under the heading 201csecurity ownership of management and certain beneficial owners 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . equity compensation plan information the following table provides information about our equity compensation plans that authorize the issuance of shares of lockheed martin common stock to employees and directors . the information is provided as of december 31 , 2016 . plan category number of securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 5802673 $ 85.82 6216471 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 1082347 2014 2481032 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to beissued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining availablefor future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by securityholders ( 1 )</td><td>5802673</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>6216471</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved bysecurity holders ( 2 )</td><td>1082347</td><td>2014</td><td>2481032</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>6885020</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>8697503</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) column ( a ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 : 1747151 shares that have been granted as restricted stock units ( rsus ) , 936308 shares that could be earned pursuant to grants of performance stock units ( psus ) ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) and 2967046 shares granted as options under the lockheed martin corporation 2011 incentive performance award plan ( 2011 ipa plan ) or predecessor plans prior to january 1 , 2013 and 23346 shares granted as options and 128822 stock units payable in stock or cash under the lockheed martin corporation 2009 directors equity plan ( directors equity plan ) or predecessor plans for members ( or former members ) of the board of directors . column ( c ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 , 5751655 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ipa plan as options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock awards ( rsas ) , rsus or psus and 464816 shares available for future issuance under the directors equity plan as stock options and stock units . of the 5751655 shares available for grant under the 2011 ipa plan on december 31 , 2016 , 516653 and 236654 shares are issuable pursuant to grants made on january 26 , 2017 , of rsus and psus ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) , respectively . the weighted average price does not take into account shares issued pursuant to rsus or psus . ( 2 ) the shares represent annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive performance ( ltip ) payments earned and voluntarily deferred by employees . the deferred amounts are payable under the deferred management incentive compensation plan ( dmicp ) . deferred amounts are credited as phantom stock units at the closing price of our stock on the date the deferral is effective . amounts equal to our dividend are credited as stock units at the time we pay a dividend . following termination of employment , a number of shares of stock equal to the number of stock units credited to the employee 2019s dmicp account are distributed to the employee . there is no discount or value transfer on the stock distributed . distributions may be made from newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market . historically , all distributions have come from shares held in a separate trust and , therefore , do not further dilute our common shares outstanding . as a result , these shares also were not considered in calculating the total weighted average exercise price in the table . because the dmicp shares are outstanding , they should be included in the denominator ( and not the numerator ) of a dilution calculation . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions and director independence . the information required by this item 13 is included under the captions 201ccorporate governance 2013 related person transaction policy , 201d 201ccorporate governance 2013 certain relationships and related person transactions of directors , executive officers , and 5 percent stockholders , 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2013 director independence 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services . the information required by this item 14 is included under the caption 201cproposal 2 2013 ratification of appointment of independent auditors 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k. .
Question: what is the number of securities to be issued?
| 5802673.0 |
CONVFINQA9037 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . the information required by item 12 is included under the heading 201csecurity ownership of management and certain beneficial owners 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . equity compensation plan information the following table provides information about our equity compensation plans that authorize the issuance of shares of lockheed martin common stock to employees and directors . the information is provided as of december 31 , 2016 . plan category number of securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 5802673 $ 85.82 6216471 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 1082347 2014 2481032 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to beissued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining availablefor future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by securityholders ( 1 )</td><td>5802673</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>6216471</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved bysecurity holders ( 2 )</td><td>1082347</td><td>2014</td><td>2481032</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>6885020</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>8697503</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) column ( a ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 : 1747151 shares that have been granted as restricted stock units ( rsus ) , 936308 shares that could be earned pursuant to grants of performance stock units ( psus ) ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) and 2967046 shares granted as options under the lockheed martin corporation 2011 incentive performance award plan ( 2011 ipa plan ) or predecessor plans prior to january 1 , 2013 and 23346 shares granted as options and 128822 stock units payable in stock or cash under the lockheed martin corporation 2009 directors equity plan ( directors equity plan ) or predecessor plans for members ( or former members ) of the board of directors . column ( c ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 , 5751655 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ipa plan as options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock awards ( rsas ) , rsus or psus and 464816 shares available for future issuance under the directors equity plan as stock options and stock units . of the 5751655 shares available for grant under the 2011 ipa plan on december 31 , 2016 , 516653 and 236654 shares are issuable pursuant to grants made on january 26 , 2017 , of rsus and psus ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) , respectively . the weighted average price does not take into account shares issued pursuant to rsus or psus . ( 2 ) the shares represent annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive performance ( ltip ) payments earned and voluntarily deferred by employees . the deferred amounts are payable under the deferred management incentive compensation plan ( dmicp ) . deferred amounts are credited as phantom stock units at the closing price of our stock on the date the deferral is effective . amounts equal to our dividend are credited as stock units at the time we pay a dividend . following termination of employment , a number of shares of stock equal to the number of stock units credited to the employee 2019s dmicp account are distributed to the employee . there is no discount or value transfer on the stock distributed . distributions may be made from newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market . historically , all distributions have come from shares held in a separate trust and , therefore , do not further dilute our common shares outstanding . as a result , these shares also were not considered in calculating the total weighted average exercise price in the table . because the dmicp shares are outstanding , they should be included in the denominator ( and not the numerator ) of a dilution calculation . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions and director independence . the information required by this item 13 is included under the captions 201ccorporate governance 2013 related person transaction policy , 201d 201ccorporate governance 2013 certain relationships and related person transactions of directors , executive officers , and 5 percent stockholders , 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2013 director independence 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services . the information required by this item 14 is included under the caption 201cproposal 2 2013 ratification of appointment of independent auditors 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k. .
Question: what is the number of securities to be issued?
Answer: 5802673.0
Question: what is the average price per security?
| 85.82 |
CONVFINQA9038 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . the information required by item 12 is included under the heading 201csecurity ownership of management and certain beneficial owners 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . equity compensation plan information the following table provides information about our equity compensation plans that authorize the issuance of shares of lockheed martin common stock to employees and directors . the information is provided as of december 31 , 2016 . plan category number of securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 5802673 $ 85.82 6216471 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 1082347 2014 2481032 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to beissued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining availablefor future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by securityholders ( 1 )</td><td>5802673</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>6216471</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved bysecurity holders ( 2 )</td><td>1082347</td><td>2014</td><td>2481032</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>6885020</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>8697503</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) column ( a ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 : 1747151 shares that have been granted as restricted stock units ( rsus ) , 936308 shares that could be earned pursuant to grants of performance stock units ( psus ) ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) and 2967046 shares granted as options under the lockheed martin corporation 2011 incentive performance award plan ( 2011 ipa plan ) or predecessor plans prior to january 1 , 2013 and 23346 shares granted as options and 128822 stock units payable in stock or cash under the lockheed martin corporation 2009 directors equity plan ( directors equity plan ) or predecessor plans for members ( or former members ) of the board of directors . column ( c ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 , 5751655 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ipa plan as options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock awards ( rsas ) , rsus or psus and 464816 shares available for future issuance under the directors equity plan as stock options and stock units . of the 5751655 shares available for grant under the 2011 ipa plan on december 31 , 2016 , 516653 and 236654 shares are issuable pursuant to grants made on january 26 , 2017 , of rsus and psus ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) , respectively . the weighted average price does not take into account shares issued pursuant to rsus or psus . ( 2 ) the shares represent annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive performance ( ltip ) payments earned and voluntarily deferred by employees . the deferred amounts are payable under the deferred management incentive compensation plan ( dmicp ) . deferred amounts are credited as phantom stock units at the closing price of our stock on the date the deferral is effective . amounts equal to our dividend are credited as stock units at the time we pay a dividend . following termination of employment , a number of shares of stock equal to the number of stock units credited to the employee 2019s dmicp account are distributed to the employee . there is no discount or value transfer on the stock distributed . distributions may be made from newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market . historically , all distributions have come from shares held in a separate trust and , therefore , do not further dilute our common shares outstanding . as a result , these shares also were not considered in calculating the total weighted average exercise price in the table . because the dmicp shares are outstanding , they should be included in the denominator ( and not the numerator ) of a dilution calculation . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions and director independence . the information required by this item 13 is included under the captions 201ccorporate governance 2013 related person transaction policy , 201d 201ccorporate governance 2013 certain relationships and related person transactions of directors , executive officers , and 5 percent stockholders , 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2013 director independence 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services . the information required by this item 14 is included under the caption 201cproposal 2 2013 ratification of appointment of independent auditors 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k. .
Question: what is the number of securities to be issued?
Answer: 5802673.0
Question: what is the average price per security?
Answer: 85.82
Question: what is the product of these values?
| 497985396.86 |
CONVFINQA9039 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . the information required by item 12 is included under the heading 201csecurity ownership of management and certain beneficial owners 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . equity compensation plan information the following table provides information about our equity compensation plans that authorize the issuance of shares of lockheed martin common stock to employees and directors . the information is provided as of december 31 , 2016 . plan category number of securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 5802673 $ 85.82 6216471 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 1082347 2014 2481032 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to beissued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining availablefor future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by securityholders ( 1 )</td><td>5802673</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>6216471</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved bysecurity holders ( 2 )</td><td>1082347</td><td>2014</td><td>2481032</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>6885020</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>8697503</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) column ( a ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 : 1747151 shares that have been granted as restricted stock units ( rsus ) , 936308 shares that could be earned pursuant to grants of performance stock units ( psus ) ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) and 2967046 shares granted as options under the lockheed martin corporation 2011 incentive performance award plan ( 2011 ipa plan ) or predecessor plans prior to january 1 , 2013 and 23346 shares granted as options and 128822 stock units payable in stock or cash under the lockheed martin corporation 2009 directors equity plan ( directors equity plan ) or predecessor plans for members ( or former members ) of the board of directors . column ( c ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 , 5751655 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ipa plan as options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock awards ( rsas ) , rsus or psus and 464816 shares available for future issuance under the directors equity plan as stock options and stock units . of the 5751655 shares available for grant under the 2011 ipa plan on december 31 , 2016 , 516653 and 236654 shares are issuable pursuant to grants made on january 26 , 2017 , of rsus and psus ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) , respectively . the weighted average price does not take into account shares issued pursuant to rsus or psus . ( 2 ) the shares represent annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive performance ( ltip ) payments earned and voluntarily deferred by employees . the deferred amounts are payable under the deferred management incentive compensation plan ( dmicp ) . deferred amounts are credited as phantom stock units at the closing price of our stock on the date the deferral is effective . amounts equal to our dividend are credited as stock units at the time we pay a dividend . following termination of employment , a number of shares of stock equal to the number of stock units credited to the employee 2019s dmicp account are distributed to the employee . there is no discount or value transfer on the stock distributed . distributions may be made from newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market . historically , all distributions have come from shares held in a separate trust and , therefore , do not further dilute our common shares outstanding . as a result , these shares also were not considered in calculating the total weighted average exercise price in the table . because the dmicp shares are outstanding , they should be included in the denominator ( and not the numerator ) of a dilution calculation . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions and director independence . the information required by this item 13 is included under the captions 201ccorporate governance 2013 related person transaction policy , 201d 201ccorporate governance 2013 certain relationships and related person transactions of directors , executive officers , and 5 percent stockholders , 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2013 director independence 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services . the information required by this item 14 is included under the caption 201cproposal 2 2013 ratification of appointment of independent auditors 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k. .
Question: what is the number of securities to be issued?
Answer: 5802673.0
Question: what is the average price per security?
Answer: 85.82
Question: what is the product of these values?
Answer: 497985396.86
Question: what is that divided by 1000000?
| 497.9854 |
CONVFINQA9040 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements sale and leaseback transactions waterford 3 lease obligations in 1989 , entergy louisiana sold and leased back 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) of its interest in waterford 3 for the aggregate sum of $ 353.6 million . the lease has an approximate term of 28 years . the lessors financed the sale-leaseback through the issuance of waterford 3 secured lease obligation bonds . the lease payments made by entergy louisiana are sufficient to service the debt . in 1994 , entergy louisiana did not exercise its option to repurchase the 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) interest in waterford 3 . as a result , entergy louisiana issued $ 208.2 million of non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds as collateral for the equity portion of certain amounts payable under the lease . in 1997 , the lessors refinanced the outstanding bonds used to finance the purchase of waterford 3 at lower interest rates , which reduced the annual lease payments . upon the occurrence of certain events , entergy louisiana may be obligated to assume the outstanding bonds used to finance the purchase of the unit and to pay an amount sufficient to withdraw from the lease transaction . such events include lease events of default , events of loss , deemed loss events , or certain adverse "financial events." "financial events" include , among other things , failure by entergy louisiana , following the expiration of any applicable grace or cure period , to maintain ( i ) total equity capital ( including preferred stock ) at least equal to 30% ( 30 % ) of adjusted capitalization , or ( ii ) a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.50 computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2003 , entergy louisiana's total equity capital ( including preferred stock ) was 49.82% ( 49.82 % ) of adjusted capitalization and its fixed charge coverage ratio for 2003 was 4.06 . as of december 31 , 2003 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 31739</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>14554</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>18262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>18754</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>22606</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>366514</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>472429</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>209895</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 262534</td></tr></table> grand gulf 1 lease obligations in december 1988 , system energy sold 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of its undivided ownership interest in grand gulf 1 for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . subsequently , system energy leased back its interest in the unit for a term of 26-1/2 years . system energy has the option of terminating the lease and repurchasing the 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) interest in the unit at certain intervals during the lease . furthermore , at the end of the lease term , system energy has the option of renewing the lease or repurchasing the 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) interest in grand gulf 1 . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant .
Question: as of december 31, 2003, what portion of the total future minimum lease payments for entergy louisiana was due to the interest amount?
| 0.44429 |
CONVFINQA9041 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements sale and leaseback transactions waterford 3 lease obligations in 1989 , entergy louisiana sold and leased back 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) of its interest in waterford 3 for the aggregate sum of $ 353.6 million . the lease has an approximate term of 28 years . the lessors financed the sale-leaseback through the issuance of waterford 3 secured lease obligation bonds . the lease payments made by entergy louisiana are sufficient to service the debt . in 1994 , entergy louisiana did not exercise its option to repurchase the 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) interest in waterford 3 . as a result , entergy louisiana issued $ 208.2 million of non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds as collateral for the equity portion of certain amounts payable under the lease . in 1997 , the lessors refinanced the outstanding bonds used to finance the purchase of waterford 3 at lower interest rates , which reduced the annual lease payments . upon the occurrence of certain events , entergy louisiana may be obligated to assume the outstanding bonds used to finance the purchase of the unit and to pay an amount sufficient to withdraw from the lease transaction . such events include lease events of default , events of loss , deemed loss events , or certain adverse "financial events." "financial events" include , among other things , failure by entergy louisiana , following the expiration of any applicable grace or cure period , to maintain ( i ) total equity capital ( including preferred stock ) at least equal to 30% ( 30 % ) of adjusted capitalization , or ( ii ) a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.50 computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2003 , entergy louisiana's total equity capital ( including preferred stock ) was 49.82% ( 49.82 % ) of adjusted capitalization and its fixed charge coverage ratio for 2003 was 4.06 . as of december 31 , 2003 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 31739</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>14554</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>18262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>18754</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>22606</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>366514</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>472429</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>209895</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 262534</td></tr></table> grand gulf 1 lease obligations in december 1988 , system energy sold 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of its undivided ownership interest in grand gulf 1 for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . subsequently , system energy leased back its interest in the unit for a term of 26-1/2 years . system energy has the option of terminating the lease and repurchasing the 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) interest in the unit at certain intervals during the lease . furthermore , at the end of the lease term , system energy has the option of renewing the lease or repurchasing the 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) interest in grand gulf 1 . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant .
Question: as of december 31, 2003, what portion of the total future minimum lease payments for entergy louisiana was due to the interest amount?
Answer: 0.44429
Question: and what portion of it was from the payments due in 2004?
| 0.06718 |
CONVFINQA9042 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below . 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures . the table below presents market risk for inventory positions that are not included in var . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . equity positions below relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . these debt positions are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories or across other market risk measures . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2013 2012 equity 1 $ 2256 $ 2471 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>asset categories</td><td>asset categories</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity1</td><td>$ 2256</td><td>$ 2471</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt</td><td>1522</td><td>1676</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3778</td><td>$ 4147</td></tr></table> 1 . december 2012 includes $ 208 million related to our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , which was sold in the first half of 2013 . credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and borrowings . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 4 million and $ 3 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 8 million and $ 7 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . interest rate sensitivity . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had $ 14.90 billion and $ 6.50 billion , respectively , of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 136 million and $ 62 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 95 .
Question: what is the sum of 4 and 3?
| 7.0 |
CONVFINQA9043 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below . 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures . the table below presents market risk for inventory positions that are not included in var . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . equity positions below relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . these debt positions are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories or across other market risk measures . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2013 2012 equity 1 $ 2256 $ 2471 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>asset categories</td><td>asset categories</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity1</td><td>$ 2256</td><td>$ 2471</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt</td><td>1522</td><td>1676</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3778</td><td>$ 4147</td></tr></table> 1 . december 2012 includes $ 208 million related to our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , which was sold in the first half of 2013 . credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and borrowings . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 4 million and $ 3 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 8 million and $ 7 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . interest rate sensitivity . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had $ 14.90 billion and $ 6.50 billion , respectively , of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 136 million and $ 62 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 95 .
Question: what is the sum of 4 and 3?
Answer: 7.0
Question: what is that divided by 2?
| 3.5 |
CONVFINQA9044 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 320078</td><td>$ 302341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stable value protection</td><td>24906</td><td>33512</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>4685</td><td>5063</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4612</td><td>4552</td></tr></table> indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what was the change in the indemnified securities financing from 2012 to 2013?
| 17737.0 |
CONVFINQA9045 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 320078</td><td>$ 302341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stable value protection</td><td>24906</td><td>33512</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>4685</td><td>5063</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4612</td><td>4552</td></tr></table> indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what was the change in the indemnified securities financing from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 17737.0
Question: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to the total of that segment in 2012?
| 0.05867 |
CONVFINQA9046 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 320078</td><td>$ 302341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stable value protection</td><td>24906</td><td>33512</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>4685</td><td>5063</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4612</td><td>4552</td></tr></table> indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what was the change in the indemnified securities financing from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 17737.0
Question: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to the total of that segment in 2012?
Answer: 0.05867
Question: in that same two year period, what was the change in the balance of asset purchase agreements?
| -378.0 |
CONVFINQA9047 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
state street corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi- annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year . each of the subordinated notes qualifies for inclusion in tier 2 regulatory capital under current federal regulatory capital guidelines . note 11 . commitments , guarantees and contingencies commitments : we had unfunded off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit totaling $ 21.30 billion and $ 17.86 billion as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the potential losses associated with these commitments equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . guarantees : off-balance sheet guarantees are composed of indemnified securities financing , stable value protection , unfunded commitments to purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts , and do not consider the value of any collateral . the following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet guarantees as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . amounts presented do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 320078</td><td>$ 302341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>stable value protection</td><td>24906</td><td>33512</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>4685</td><td>5063</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4612</td><td>4552</td></tr></table> indemnified securities financing on behalf of our clients , we lend their securities , as agent , to brokers and other institutions . in most circumstances , we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . we require the borrowers to maintain collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . securities on loan and the collateral are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower . collateral received in connection with our securities lending services is held by us as agent and is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . the cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients . in certain cases , the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested . we require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . in our role as agent , the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what was the change in the indemnified securities financing from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 17737.0
Question: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to the total of that segment in 2012?
Answer: 0.05867
Question: in that same two year period, what was the change in the balance of asset purchase agreements?
Answer: -378.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that balance in 2012, in percentage?
| -0.07466 |
CONVFINQA9048 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facility</td><td>$ 156.2</td><td>$ 358.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>uncommitted credit facilities</td><td>0.5</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 156.7</td><td>$ 363.9</td></tr></table> z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total debt for 2002?
| 156.7 |
CONVFINQA9049 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facility</td><td>$ 156.2</td><td>$ 358.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>uncommitted credit facilities</td><td>0.5</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 156.7</td><td>$ 363.9</td></tr></table> z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total debt for 2002?
Answer: 156.7
Question: and in 2001?
| 363.9 |
CONVFINQA9050 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facility</td><td>$ 156.2</td><td>$ 358.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>uncommitted credit facilities</td><td>0.5</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 156.7</td><td>$ 363.9</td></tr></table> z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total debt for 2002?
Answer: 156.7
Question: and in 2001?
Answer: 363.9
Question: combined, what was the total debt for these periods?
| 520.6 |
CONVFINQA9051 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facility</td><td>$ 156.2</td><td>$ 358.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>uncommitted credit facilities</td><td>0.5</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 156.7</td><td>$ 363.9</td></tr></table> z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total debt for 2002?
Answer: 156.7
Question: and in 2001?
Answer: 363.9
Question: combined, what was the total debt for these periods?
Answer: 520.6
Question: and the specific value for 2002?
| 156.7 |
CONVFINQA9052 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facility</td><td>$ 156.2</td><td>$ 358.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>uncommitted credit facilities</td><td>0.5</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 156.7</td><td>$ 363.9</td></tr></table> z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total debt for 2002?
Answer: 156.7
Question: and in 2001?
Answer: 363.9
Question: combined, what was the total debt for these periods?
Answer: 520.6
Question: and the specific value for 2002?
Answer: 156.7
Question: so what percent of the total debt is in the 2002 debt balance?
| 0.301 |
CONVFINQA9053 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2014 and 2013 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>144</td><td>20244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>18877</td><td>16777</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-995 ( 995 )</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-1630 ( 1630 )</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-3646 ( 3646 )</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 148848</td><td>$ 136098</td></tr></table> as of november 28 , 2014 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 14.6 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the u.s . for ireland , california and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2008 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering fiscal 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2014 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 , in order to better align our global resources for digital media and digital marketing , we initiated a restructuring plan to vacate our research and development facility in china and our sales and marketing facility in russia . this plan consisted of reductions of approximately 350 full-time positions and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 18.8 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the positions eliminated . during fiscal 2015 , we intend to vacate both of these facilities . the amount accrued for the fair value of future contractual obligations under these operating leases was insignificant . other restructuring plans during the past several years , we have implemented other restructuring plans consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities to better align our resources around our business strategies . as of november 28 , 2014 , we considered our other restructuring plans to be substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant. .
Question: what was the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
| 136098.0 |
CONVFINQA9054 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2014 and 2013 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>144</td><td>20244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>18877</td><td>16777</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-995 ( 995 )</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-1630 ( 1630 )</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-3646 ( 3646 )</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 148848</td><td>$ 136098</td></tr></table> as of november 28 , 2014 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 14.6 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the u.s . for ireland , california and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2008 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering fiscal 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2014 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 , in order to better align our global resources for digital media and digital marketing , we initiated a restructuring plan to vacate our research and development facility in china and our sales and marketing facility in russia . this plan consisted of reductions of approximately 350 full-time positions and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 18.8 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the positions eliminated . during fiscal 2015 , we intend to vacate both of these facilities . the amount accrued for the fair value of future contractual obligations under these operating leases was insignificant . other restructuring plans during the past several years , we have implemented other restructuring plans consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities to better align our resources around our business strategies . as of november 28 , 2014 , we considered our other restructuring plans to be substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant. .
Question: what was the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
Answer: 136098.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
| 160468.0 |
CONVFINQA9055 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2014 and 2013 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>144</td><td>20244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>18877</td><td>16777</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-995 ( 995 )</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-1630 ( 1630 )</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-3646 ( 3646 )</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 148848</td><td>$ 136098</td></tr></table> as of november 28 , 2014 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 14.6 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the u.s . for ireland , california and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2008 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering fiscal 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2014 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 , in order to better align our global resources for digital media and digital marketing , we initiated a restructuring plan to vacate our research and development facility in china and our sales and marketing facility in russia . this plan consisted of reductions of approximately 350 full-time positions and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 18.8 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the positions eliminated . during fiscal 2015 , we intend to vacate both of these facilities . the amount accrued for the fair value of future contractual obligations under these operating leases was insignificant . other restructuring plans during the past several years , we have implemented other restructuring plans consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities to better align our resources around our business strategies . as of november 28 , 2014 , we considered our other restructuring plans to be substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant. .
Question: what was the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
Answer: 136098.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
Answer: 160468.0
Question: what was, then, the change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the year?
| -24370.0 |
CONVFINQA9056 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2014 and 2013 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>144</td><td>20244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>18877</td><td>16777</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-995 ( 995 )</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-1630 ( 1630 )</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-3646 ( 3646 )</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 148848</td><td>$ 136098</td></tr></table> as of november 28 , 2014 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 14.6 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the u.s . for ireland , california and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2008 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering fiscal 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2014 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 , in order to better align our global resources for digital media and digital marketing , we initiated a restructuring plan to vacate our research and development facility in china and our sales and marketing facility in russia . this plan consisted of reductions of approximately 350 full-time positions and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 18.8 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the positions eliminated . during fiscal 2015 , we intend to vacate both of these facilities . the amount accrued for the fair value of future contractual obligations under these operating leases was insignificant . other restructuring plans during the past several years , we have implemented other restructuring plans consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities to better align our resources around our business strategies . as of november 28 , 2014 , we considered our other restructuring plans to be substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant. .
Question: what was the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
Answer: 136098.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
Answer: 160468.0
Question: what was, then, the change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the year?
Answer: -24370.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2012 total gross amount, in percentage?
| -0.15187 |
CONVFINQA9057 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses overview and key data as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional development on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2009 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.8 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 25 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim pay- ments are reliably determinable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry net reserves of $ 76 million , net of discount . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>2009 net losses</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td><td>$ 37112</td><td>$ 13520</td><td>$ 23592</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>11141</td><td>3719</td><td>7422</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-11093 ( 11093 )</td><td>-4145 ( 4145 )</td><td>-6948 ( 6948 )</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>559</td><td>236</td><td>323</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 37783</td><td>$ 12745</td><td>$ 25038</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance .
Question: what was the change in gross unpaid losses from 2008 to 2009?
| 607.0 |
CONVFINQA9058 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses overview and key data as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional development on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2009 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.8 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 25 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim pay- ments are reliably determinable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry net reserves of $ 76 million , net of discount . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>2009 net losses</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td><td>$ 37112</td><td>$ 13520</td><td>$ 23592</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>11141</td><td>3719</td><td>7422</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-11093 ( 11093 )</td><td>-4145 ( 4145 )</td><td>-6948 ( 6948 )</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>559</td><td>236</td><td>323</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 37783</td><td>$ 12745</td><td>$ 25038</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance .
Question: what was the change in gross unpaid losses from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 607.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of those losses in 2008?
| 0.01633 |
CONVFINQA9059 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses overview and key data as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional development on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2009 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.8 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 25 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim pay- ments are reliably determinable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry net reserves of $ 76 million , net of discount . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>2009 net losses</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td><td>$ 37112</td><td>$ 13520</td><td>$ 23592</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>11141</td><td>3719</td><td>7422</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-11093 ( 11093 )</td><td>-4145 ( 4145 )</td><td>-6948 ( 6948 )</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>559</td><td>236</td><td>323</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 37783</td><td>$ 12745</td><td>$ 25038</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance .
Question: what was the change in gross unpaid losses from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 607.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of those losses in 2008?
Answer: 0.01633
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the net unpaid losses?
| 797.0 |
CONVFINQA9060 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses overview and key data as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional development on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2009 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.8 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 25 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim pay- ments are reliably determinable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry net reserves of $ 76 million , net of discount . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>2009 net losses</td><td>2009 gross losses</td><td>2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td><td>$ 37112</td><td>$ 13520</td><td>$ 23592</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>11141</td><td>3719</td><td>7422</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-11093 ( 11093 )</td><td>-4145 ( 4145 )</td><td>-6948 ( 6948 )</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>559</td><td>236</td><td>323</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 37783</td><td>$ 12745</td><td>$ 25038</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance .
Question: what was the change in gross unpaid losses from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 607.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of those losses in 2008?
Answer: 0.01633
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the net unpaid losses?
Answer: 797.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2008 losses?
| 0.03288 |
CONVFINQA9061 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operations may be extended up to four additional years for each unit by mutual agreement of entergy and new york state based on an exigent reliability need for indian point generation . in accordance with the ferc-approved tariff of the new york independent system operator ( nyiso ) , entergy submitted to the nyiso a notice of generator deactivation based on the dates in the settlement ( no later than april 30 , 2020 for indian point unit 2 and april 30 , 2021 for indian point unit 3 ) . in december 2017 , nyiso issued a report stating there will not be a system reliability need following the deactivation of indian point . the nyiso also has advised that it will perform an analysis of the potential competitive impacts of the proposed retirement under provisions of its tariff . the deadline for the nyiso to make a withholding determination is in dispute and is pending before the ferc . in addition to contractually agreeing to cease commercial operations early , in february 2017 entergy filed with the nrc an amendment to its license renewal application changing the term of the requested licenses to coincide with the latest possible extension by mutual agreement based on exigent reliability needs : april 30 , 2024 for indian point 2 and april 30 , 2025 for indian point 3 . if entergy reasonably determines that the nrc will treat the amendment other than as a routine amendment , entergy may withdraw the amendment . other provisions of the settlement include termination of all then-existing investigations of indian point by the agencies signing the agreement , which include the new york state department of environmental conservation , the new york state department of state , the new york state department of public service , the new york state department of health , and the new york state attorney general . the settlement recognizes the right of new york state agencies to pursue new investigations and enforcement actions with respect to new circumstances or existing conditions that become materially exacerbated . another provision of the settlement obligates entergy to establish a $ 15 million fund for environmental projects and community support . apportionment and allocation of funds to beneficiaries are to be determined by mutual agreement of new york state and entergy . the settlement recognizes new york state 2019s right to perform an annual inspection of indian point , with scope and timing to be determined by mutual agreement . in may 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging new york state 2019s actions in signing and implementing the indian point settlement with entergy on the basis that the state failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions . all signatories to the settlement agreement , including the entergy affiliates that hold nrc licenses for indian point , were named . the appeals were voluntarily dismissed in november 2017 . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital ratio for entergy as of december 31 , 2017 is primarily due to an increase in commercial paper outstanding in 2017 as compared to 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>67.1% ( 67.1 % )</td><td>64.8% ( 64.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) )</td><td>( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>66.3% ( 66.3 % )</td><td>63.8% ( 63.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td><td>( 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>65.2% ( 65.2 % )</td><td>61.8% ( 61.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , new orleans , and texas securitization bonds , which are non- recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas , respectively. .
Question: what was the net change in the debt-to-capital ratio from 2016 to 2017?
| 2.3 |
CONVFINQA9062 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operations may be extended up to four additional years for each unit by mutual agreement of entergy and new york state based on an exigent reliability need for indian point generation . in accordance with the ferc-approved tariff of the new york independent system operator ( nyiso ) , entergy submitted to the nyiso a notice of generator deactivation based on the dates in the settlement ( no later than april 30 , 2020 for indian point unit 2 and april 30 , 2021 for indian point unit 3 ) . in december 2017 , nyiso issued a report stating there will not be a system reliability need following the deactivation of indian point . the nyiso also has advised that it will perform an analysis of the potential competitive impacts of the proposed retirement under provisions of its tariff . the deadline for the nyiso to make a withholding determination is in dispute and is pending before the ferc . in addition to contractually agreeing to cease commercial operations early , in february 2017 entergy filed with the nrc an amendment to its license renewal application changing the term of the requested licenses to coincide with the latest possible extension by mutual agreement based on exigent reliability needs : april 30 , 2024 for indian point 2 and april 30 , 2025 for indian point 3 . if entergy reasonably determines that the nrc will treat the amendment other than as a routine amendment , entergy may withdraw the amendment . other provisions of the settlement include termination of all then-existing investigations of indian point by the agencies signing the agreement , which include the new york state department of environmental conservation , the new york state department of state , the new york state department of public service , the new york state department of health , and the new york state attorney general . the settlement recognizes the right of new york state agencies to pursue new investigations and enforcement actions with respect to new circumstances or existing conditions that become materially exacerbated . another provision of the settlement obligates entergy to establish a $ 15 million fund for environmental projects and community support . apportionment and allocation of funds to beneficiaries are to be determined by mutual agreement of new york state and entergy . the settlement recognizes new york state 2019s right to perform an annual inspection of indian point , with scope and timing to be determined by mutual agreement . in may 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging new york state 2019s actions in signing and implementing the indian point settlement with entergy on the basis that the state failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions . all signatories to the settlement agreement , including the entergy affiliates that hold nrc licenses for indian point , were named . the appeals were voluntarily dismissed in november 2017 . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital ratio for entergy as of december 31 , 2017 is primarily due to an increase in commercial paper outstanding in 2017 as compared to 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>67.1% ( 67.1 % )</td><td>64.8% ( 64.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) )</td><td>( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>66.3% ( 66.3 % )</td><td>63.8% ( 63.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td><td>( 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>65.2% ( 65.2 % )</td><td>61.8% ( 61.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , new orleans , and texas securitization bonds , which are non- recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas , respectively. .
Question: what was the net change in the debt-to-capital ratio from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 2.3
Question: what is that divided by the 2016 ratio?
| 0.03549 |
CONVFINQA9063 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>108.91</td><td>129.64</td><td>113.59</td><td>104.47</td><td>128.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.57</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>113.39</td><td>142.85</td><td>150.44</td><td>142.44</td><td>165.34</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .
Question: what was the value of loews common stock in 2012?
| 108.91 |
CONVFINQA9064 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>108.91</td><td>129.64</td><td>113.59</td><td>104.47</td><td>128.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.57</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>113.39</td><td>142.85</td><td>150.44</td><td>142.44</td><td>165.34</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .
Question: what was the value of loews common stock in 2012?
Answer: 108.91
Question: what is that less 100?
| 8.91 |
CONVFINQA9065 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>108.91</td><td>129.64</td><td>113.59</td><td>104.47</td><td>128.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.57</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>113.39</td><td>142.85</td><td>150.44</td><td>142.44</td><td>165.34</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .
Question: what was the value of loews common stock in 2012?
Answer: 108.91
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer: 8.91
Question: what is the change divided by 100?
| 0.0891 |
CONVFINQA9066 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 14953</td><td>$ 14362</td><td>$ 13109</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1699</td><td>1630</td><td>1498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>11.3% ( 11.3 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>30100</td><td>30500</td><td>27500</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2012?
| 1699.0 |
CONVFINQA9067 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 14953</td><td>$ 14362</td><td>$ 13109</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1699</td><td>1630</td><td>1498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>11.3% ( 11.3 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>30100</td><td>30500</td><td>27500</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2012?
Answer: 1699.0
Question: and in 2011?
| 1630.0 |
CONVFINQA9068 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 14953</td><td>$ 14362</td><td>$ 13109</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1699</td><td>1630</td><td>1498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>11.3% ( 11.3 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>30100</td><td>30500</td><td>27500</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2012?
Answer: 1699.0
Question: and in 2011?
Answer: 1630.0
Question: so what was the difference between the two years?
| 69.0 |
CONVFINQA9069 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 14953</td><td>$ 14362</td><td>$ 13109</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1699</td><td>1630</td><td>1498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>11.3% ( 11.3 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>30100</td><td>30500</td><td>27500</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what was the operating profit in 2012?
Answer: 1699.0
Question: and in 2011?
Answer: 1630.0
Question: so what was the difference between the two years?
Answer: 69.0
Question: and the growth rate during this time?
| 0.04233 |
CONVFINQA9070 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p500 in 2012?
| 136.26 |
CONVFINQA9071 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p500 in 2012?
Answer: 136.26
Question: and what was it in 2010?
| 115.06 |
CONVFINQA9072 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p500 in 2012?
Answer: 136.26
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 115.06
Question: what was, then, the change in its value over the year?
| 21.2 |
CONVFINQA9073 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p500 in 2012?
Answer: 136.26
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 115.06
Question: what was, then, the change in its value over the year?
Answer: 21.2
Question: what was the value of the s&p500 in 2010?
| 115.06 |
CONVFINQA9074 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 130.29</td><td>$ 135.35</td><td>$ 140.54</td><td>$ 205.95</td><td>$ 223.79</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.06</td><td>$ 117.48</td><td>$ 136.26</td><td>$ 180.38</td><td>$ 205.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.74</td><td>$ 126.75</td><td>$ 136.24</td><td>$ 192.61</td><td>$ 240.91</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p500 in 2012?
Answer: 136.26
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 115.06
Question: what was, then, the change in its value over the year?
Answer: 21.2
Question: what was the value of the s&p500 in 2010?
Answer: 115.06
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2010 value?
| 0.18425 |
CONVFINQA9075 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what is the net change in value of global payments from 2003 to 2004?
| 35.57 |
CONVFINQA9076 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what is the net change in value of global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 35.57
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.3776 |
CONVFINQA9077 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 , largely due to higher legal and regulatory fees in 2016 related to our business activities and product offerings as well as higher professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . the overall decrease in operating expenses in 2017 when compared with 2016 was partially offset by the following increases : 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense resulting from incentive payments made to facilitate the transition of the russell contract open interest , as well as increased costs of revenue sharing agreements for certain licensed products . the overall increase in 2017 was partially offset by lower expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to lower volume for these products compared to 2016 . 2022 compensation and benefits expense increased as a result of higher average headcount primarily in our international locations as well as normal cost of living adjustments . 2016 compared with 2015 operating expenses increased by $ 54.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015 . the following table shows the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the net decrease in operating expenses . ( dollars in millions ) over-year change change as a percentage of 2015 expenses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>year-over-yearchange</td><td>change as apercentage of2015 expenses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loss on datacenter and related legal fees</td><td>$ 28.6</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>professional fees and outside services</td><td>24.4</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation</td><td>13.2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>licensing and other fee agreements</td><td>12.0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reorganization severance and retirement costs</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>real estate taxes and fees</td><td>-10.0 ( 10.0 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other expenses net</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54.4</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td></tr></table> overall operating expenses increased in 2016 when compared with 2015 due to the following reasons : 2022 in 2016 , we recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees as a result of our sale and leaseback of our datacenter . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense increased in 2016 largely due to an increase in legal and regulatory efforts related to our business activities and product offerings as well as an increase in professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . 2022 in 2016 , we recognized a net loss of $ 24.5 million due to an unfavorable change in exchange rates on foreign cash balances , compared with a net loss of $ 11.3 million in 2015 . 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to both higher volume and an increase in license rates for certain equity and energy products. .
Question: what is the ratio of the total operating expenses year over year change to the change as a percent?
| 1360.0 |
CONVFINQA9078 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 , largely due to higher legal and regulatory fees in 2016 related to our business activities and product offerings as well as higher professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . the overall decrease in operating expenses in 2017 when compared with 2016 was partially offset by the following increases : 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense resulting from incentive payments made to facilitate the transition of the russell contract open interest , as well as increased costs of revenue sharing agreements for certain licensed products . the overall increase in 2017 was partially offset by lower expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to lower volume for these products compared to 2016 . 2022 compensation and benefits expense increased as a result of higher average headcount primarily in our international locations as well as normal cost of living adjustments . 2016 compared with 2015 operating expenses increased by $ 54.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015 . the following table shows the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the net decrease in operating expenses . ( dollars in millions ) over-year change change as a percentage of 2015 expenses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>year-over-yearchange</td><td>change as apercentage of2015 expenses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loss on datacenter and related legal fees</td><td>$ 28.6</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>professional fees and outside services</td><td>24.4</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation</td><td>13.2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>licensing and other fee agreements</td><td>12.0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reorganization severance and retirement costs</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>real estate taxes and fees</td><td>-10.0 ( 10.0 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other expenses net</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54.4</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td></tr></table> overall operating expenses increased in 2016 when compared with 2015 due to the following reasons : 2022 in 2016 , we recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees as a result of our sale and leaseback of our datacenter . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense increased in 2016 largely due to an increase in legal and regulatory efforts related to our business activities and product offerings as well as an increase in professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . 2022 in 2016 , we recognized a net loss of $ 24.5 million due to an unfavorable change in exchange rates on foreign cash balances , compared with a net loss of $ 11.3 million in 2015 . 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to both higher volume and an increase in license rates for certain equity and energy products. .
Question: what is the ratio of the total operating expenses year over year change to the change as a percent?
Answer: 1360.0
Question: what is the total operating expenses year over year change?
| 54.4 |
CONVFINQA9079 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 , largely due to higher legal and regulatory fees in 2016 related to our business activities and product offerings as well as higher professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . the overall decrease in operating expenses in 2017 when compared with 2016 was partially offset by the following increases : 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense resulting from incentive payments made to facilitate the transition of the russell contract open interest , as well as increased costs of revenue sharing agreements for certain licensed products . the overall increase in 2017 was partially offset by lower expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to lower volume for these products compared to 2016 . 2022 compensation and benefits expense increased as a result of higher average headcount primarily in our international locations as well as normal cost of living adjustments . 2016 compared with 2015 operating expenses increased by $ 54.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015 . the following table shows the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the net decrease in operating expenses . ( dollars in millions ) over-year change change as a percentage of 2015 expenses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>year-over-yearchange</td><td>change as apercentage of2015 expenses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loss on datacenter and related legal fees</td><td>$ 28.6</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>professional fees and outside services</td><td>24.4</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation</td><td>13.2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>licensing and other fee agreements</td><td>12.0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reorganization severance and retirement costs</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>real estate taxes and fees</td><td>-10.0 ( 10.0 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other expenses net</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54.4</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td></tr></table> overall operating expenses increased in 2016 when compared with 2015 due to the following reasons : 2022 in 2016 , we recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees as a result of our sale and leaseback of our datacenter . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense increased in 2016 largely due to an increase in legal and regulatory efforts related to our business activities and product offerings as well as an increase in professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . 2022 in 2016 , we recognized a net loss of $ 24.5 million due to an unfavorable change in exchange rates on foreign cash balances , compared with a net loss of $ 11.3 million in 2015 . 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to both higher volume and an increase in license rates for certain equity and energy products. .
Question: what is the ratio of the total operating expenses year over year change to the change as a percent?
Answer: 1360.0
Question: what is the total operating expenses year over year change?
Answer: 54.4
Question: what is the quotient divided by the total operating expense year over year change?
| 1414.4 |
CONVFINQA9080 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
property investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 24622</td><td>$ 28681</td><td>$ 51699</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>27029</td><td>24471</td><td>37898</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>7698</td><td>8748</td><td>9224</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 59349</td><td>$ 61900</td><td>$ 98821</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 401442</td><td>$ 370466</td><td>$ 446722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 38410</td><td>$ 30790</td><td>$ 31503</td></tr></table> second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .
Question: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2016?
| 25.9 |
CONVFINQA9081 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
property investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 24622</td><td>$ 28681</td><td>$ 51699</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>27029</td><td>24471</td><td>37898</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>7698</td><td>8748</td><td>9224</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 59349</td><td>$ 61900</td><td>$ 98821</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 401442</td><td>$ 370466</td><td>$ 446722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 38410</td><td>$ 30790</td><td>$ 31503</td></tr></table> second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .
Question: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2016?
Answer: 25.9
Question: and what were they in 2014?
| 28.8 |
CONVFINQA9082 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
property investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 24622</td><td>$ 28681</td><td>$ 51699</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>27029</td><td>24471</td><td>37898</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>7698</td><td>8748</td><td>9224</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 59349</td><td>$ 61900</td><td>$ 98821</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 401442</td><td>$ 370466</td><td>$ 446722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 38410</td><td>$ 30790</td><td>$ 31503</td></tr></table> second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .
Question: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2016?
Answer: 25.9
Question: and what were they in 2014?
Answer: 28.8
Question: what is, then, the total value of those costs in 2014 and 2016?
| 54.7 |
CONVFINQA9083 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
property investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 24622</td><td>$ 28681</td><td>$ 51699</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>27029</td><td>24471</td><td>37898</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>7698</td><td>8748</td><td>9224</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 59349</td><td>$ 61900</td><td>$ 98821</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 401442</td><td>$ 370466</td><td>$ 446722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 38410</td><td>$ 30790</td><td>$ 31503</td></tr></table> second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .
Question: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2016?
Answer: 25.9
Question: and what were they in 2014?
Answer: 28.8
Question: what is, then, the total value of those costs in 2014 and 2016?
Answer: 54.7
Question: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2015?
| 23.8 |
CONVFINQA9084 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
property investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 24622</td><td>$ 28681</td><td>$ 51699</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>27029</td><td>24471</td><td>37898</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>7698</td><td>8748</td><td>9224</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 59349</td><td>$ 61900</td><td>$ 98821</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 401442</td><td>$ 370466</td><td>$ 446722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 38410</td><td>$ 30790</td><td>$ 31503</td></tr></table> second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .
Question: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2016?
Answer: 25.9
Question: and what were they in 2014?
Answer: 28.8
Question: what is, then, the total value of those costs in 2014 and 2016?
Answer: 54.7
Question: what were the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space in the year of 2015?
Answer: 23.8
Question: what is, then, the total value of those costs, including the year of 2015?
| 78.5 |
CONVFINQA9085 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees and warranties in april 2015 , we entered into joint venture arrangements in saudi arabia . an equity bridge loan has been provided to the joint venture until 2020 to fund equity commitments , and we guaranteed the repayment of our 25% ( 25 % ) share of this loan . our venture partner guaranteed repayment of their share . our maximum exposure under the guarantee is approximately $ 100 . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on the equity bridge loan . air products has also entered into a sale of equipment contract with the joint venture to engineer , procure , and construct the industrial gas facilities that will supply gases to saudi aramco . we will provide bank guarantees to the joint venture of up to $ 326 to support our performance under the contract . we are party to an equity support agreement and operations guarantee related to an air separation facility constructed in trinidad for a venture in which we own 50% ( 50 % ) . at 30 september 2015 , maximum potential payments under joint and several guarantees were $ 30.0 . exposures under the guarantee decline over time and will be completely extinguished by 2024 . during the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of our homecare business and entered into an operations guarantee related to obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . our maximum potential payment under the guarantee is a320 million ( approximately $ 30 at 30 september 2015 ) , and our exposure will be extinguished by 2020 . to date , no equity contributions or payments have been made since the inception of these guarantees . the fair value of the above guarantees is not material . we , in the normal course of business operations , have issued product warranties related to equipment sales . also , contracts often contain standard terms and conditions which typically include a warranty and indemnification to the buyer that the goods and services purchased do not infringe on third-party intellectual property rights . the provision for estimated future costs relating to warranties is not material to the consolidated financial statements . we do not expect that any sum we may have to pay in connection with guarantees and warranties will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , liquidity , or results of operations . unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 917</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1370</td></tr></table> approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016. .
Question: what was the total of unconditional purchase obligations in 2017?
| 117.0 |
CONVFINQA9086 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees and warranties in april 2015 , we entered into joint venture arrangements in saudi arabia . an equity bridge loan has been provided to the joint venture until 2020 to fund equity commitments , and we guaranteed the repayment of our 25% ( 25 % ) share of this loan . our venture partner guaranteed repayment of their share . our maximum exposure under the guarantee is approximately $ 100 . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on the equity bridge loan . air products has also entered into a sale of equipment contract with the joint venture to engineer , procure , and construct the industrial gas facilities that will supply gases to saudi aramco . we will provide bank guarantees to the joint venture of up to $ 326 to support our performance under the contract . we are party to an equity support agreement and operations guarantee related to an air separation facility constructed in trinidad for a venture in which we own 50% ( 50 % ) . at 30 september 2015 , maximum potential payments under joint and several guarantees were $ 30.0 . exposures under the guarantee decline over time and will be completely extinguished by 2024 . during the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of our homecare business and entered into an operations guarantee related to obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . our maximum potential payment under the guarantee is a320 million ( approximately $ 30 at 30 september 2015 ) , and our exposure will be extinguished by 2020 . to date , no equity contributions or payments have been made since the inception of these guarantees . the fair value of the above guarantees is not material . we , in the normal course of business operations , have issued product warranties related to equipment sales . also , contracts often contain standard terms and conditions which typically include a warranty and indemnification to the buyer that the goods and services purchased do not infringe on third-party intellectual property rights . the provision for estimated future costs relating to warranties is not material to the consolidated financial statements . we do not expect that any sum we may have to pay in connection with guarantees and warranties will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , liquidity , or results of operations . unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 917</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1370</td></tr></table> approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016. .
Question: what was the total of unconditional purchase obligations in 2017?
Answer: 117.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
| 917.0 |
CONVFINQA9087 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees and warranties in april 2015 , we entered into joint venture arrangements in saudi arabia . an equity bridge loan has been provided to the joint venture until 2020 to fund equity commitments , and we guaranteed the repayment of our 25% ( 25 % ) share of this loan . our venture partner guaranteed repayment of their share . our maximum exposure under the guarantee is approximately $ 100 . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on the equity bridge loan . air products has also entered into a sale of equipment contract with the joint venture to engineer , procure , and construct the industrial gas facilities that will supply gases to saudi aramco . we will provide bank guarantees to the joint venture of up to $ 326 to support our performance under the contract . we are party to an equity support agreement and operations guarantee related to an air separation facility constructed in trinidad for a venture in which we own 50% ( 50 % ) . at 30 september 2015 , maximum potential payments under joint and several guarantees were $ 30.0 . exposures under the guarantee decline over time and will be completely extinguished by 2024 . during the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of our homecare business and entered into an operations guarantee related to obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . our maximum potential payment under the guarantee is a320 million ( approximately $ 30 at 30 september 2015 ) , and our exposure will be extinguished by 2020 . to date , no equity contributions or payments have been made since the inception of these guarantees . the fair value of the above guarantees is not material . we , in the normal course of business operations , have issued product warranties related to equipment sales . also , contracts often contain standard terms and conditions which typically include a warranty and indemnification to the buyer that the goods and services purchased do not infringe on third-party intellectual property rights . the provision for estimated future costs relating to warranties is not material to the consolidated financial statements . we do not expect that any sum we may have to pay in connection with guarantees and warranties will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , liquidity , or results of operations . unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 917</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1370</td></tr></table> approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016. .
Question: what was the total of unconditional purchase obligations in 2017?
Answer: 117.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 917.0
Question: what was, then, the change in unconditional purchase obligations over the year?
| -800.0 |
CONVFINQA9088 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees and warranties in april 2015 , we entered into joint venture arrangements in saudi arabia . an equity bridge loan has been provided to the joint venture until 2020 to fund equity commitments , and we guaranteed the repayment of our 25% ( 25 % ) share of this loan . our venture partner guaranteed repayment of their share . our maximum exposure under the guarantee is approximately $ 100 . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on the equity bridge loan . air products has also entered into a sale of equipment contract with the joint venture to engineer , procure , and construct the industrial gas facilities that will supply gases to saudi aramco . we will provide bank guarantees to the joint venture of up to $ 326 to support our performance under the contract . we are party to an equity support agreement and operations guarantee related to an air separation facility constructed in trinidad for a venture in which we own 50% ( 50 % ) . at 30 september 2015 , maximum potential payments under joint and several guarantees were $ 30.0 . exposures under the guarantee decline over time and will be completely extinguished by 2024 . during the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of our homecare business and entered into an operations guarantee related to obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . our maximum potential payment under the guarantee is a320 million ( approximately $ 30 at 30 september 2015 ) , and our exposure will be extinguished by 2020 . to date , no equity contributions or payments have been made since the inception of these guarantees . the fair value of the above guarantees is not material . we , in the normal course of business operations , have issued product warranties related to equipment sales . also , contracts often contain standard terms and conditions which typically include a warranty and indemnification to the buyer that the goods and services purchased do not infringe on third-party intellectual property rights . the provision for estimated future costs relating to warranties is not material to the consolidated financial statements . we do not expect that any sum we may have to pay in connection with guarantees and warranties will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , liquidity , or results of operations . unconditional purchase obligations we are obligated to make future payments under unconditional purchase obligations as summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 917</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1370</td></tr></table> approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016. .
Question: what was the total of unconditional purchase obligations in 2017?
Answer: 117.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 917.0
Question: what was, then, the change in unconditional purchase obligations over the year?
Answer: -800.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2016 total?
| -0.87241 |
CONVFINQA9089 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements preferred shares 2013 in connection with the acquisition of western discussed in note 6 , the board of directors authorized a class of voting preferred stock consisting of 6 million shares . upon completion of the acquisition , we issued 5 million shares of this voting preferred stock to a trustee , who holds the shares for the benefit of the holders of the exchangeable shares discussed above . each share of voting preferred stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to the holders of marathon common stock . each holder of exchangeable shares may direct the trustee to vote the number of shares of voting preferred stock equal to the number of shares of marathon common stock issuable upon the exchange of the exchangeable shares held by that holder . in no event will the aggregate number of votes entitled to be cast by the trustee with respect to the outstanding shares of voting preferred stock exceed the number of votes entitled to be cast with respect to the outstanding exchangeable shares . except as otherwise provided in our restated certificate of incorporation or by applicable law , the common stock and the voting preferred stock will vote together as a single class in the election of directors of marathon and on all other matters submitted to a vote of stockholders of marathon generally . the voting preferred stock will have no other voting rights except as required by law . other than dividends payable solely in shares of voting preferred stock , no dividend or other distribution , will be paid or payable to the holder of the voting preferred stock . in the event of any liquidation , dissolution or winding up of marathon , the holder of shares of the voting preferred stock will not be entitled to receive any assets of marathon available for distribution to its stockholders . the voting preferred stock is not convertible into any other class or series of the capital stock of marathon or into cash , property or other rights , and may not be redeemed . 26 . leases we lease a wide variety of facilities and equipment under operating leases , including land and building space , office equipment , production facilities and transportation equipment . most long-term leases include renewal options and , in certain leases , purchase options . future minimum commitments for capital lease obligations ( including sale-leasebacks accounted for as financings ) and for operating lease obligations having initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in millions ) capital obligations ( a ) operating obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>capital lease obligations ( a )</td><td>operating lease obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>45</td><td>133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>47</td><td>110</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>60</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>39</td><td>85</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>426</td><td>379</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>sublease rentals</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 657</td><td>$ 967</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less imputed interest costs</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 459</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( a ) capital lease obligations includes $ 335 million related to assets under construction as of december 31 , 2008 . these leases are currently reported in long-term debt based on percentage of construction completed at $ 126 million . in connection with past sales of various plants and operations , we assigned and the purchasers assumed certain leases of major equipment used in the divested plants and operations of united states steel . in the event of a default by any of the purchasers , united states steel has assumed these obligations ; however , we remain primarily obligated for payments under these leases . minimum lease payments under these operating lease obligations of $ 21 million have been included above and an equal amount has been reported as sublease rentals . of the $ 459 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 69 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement. .
Question: as of december 31, 2008, what would have been, in millions, the total undiscounted minimum capital lease obligations excluding the assets under construction?
| 322.0 |
CONVFINQA9090 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements preferred shares 2013 in connection with the acquisition of western discussed in note 6 , the board of directors authorized a class of voting preferred stock consisting of 6 million shares . upon completion of the acquisition , we issued 5 million shares of this voting preferred stock to a trustee , who holds the shares for the benefit of the holders of the exchangeable shares discussed above . each share of voting preferred stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to the holders of marathon common stock . each holder of exchangeable shares may direct the trustee to vote the number of shares of voting preferred stock equal to the number of shares of marathon common stock issuable upon the exchange of the exchangeable shares held by that holder . in no event will the aggregate number of votes entitled to be cast by the trustee with respect to the outstanding shares of voting preferred stock exceed the number of votes entitled to be cast with respect to the outstanding exchangeable shares . except as otherwise provided in our restated certificate of incorporation or by applicable law , the common stock and the voting preferred stock will vote together as a single class in the election of directors of marathon and on all other matters submitted to a vote of stockholders of marathon generally . the voting preferred stock will have no other voting rights except as required by law . other than dividends payable solely in shares of voting preferred stock , no dividend or other distribution , will be paid or payable to the holder of the voting preferred stock . in the event of any liquidation , dissolution or winding up of marathon , the holder of shares of the voting preferred stock will not be entitled to receive any assets of marathon available for distribution to its stockholders . the voting preferred stock is not convertible into any other class or series of the capital stock of marathon or into cash , property or other rights , and may not be redeemed . 26 . leases we lease a wide variety of facilities and equipment under operating leases , including land and building space , office equipment , production facilities and transportation equipment . most long-term leases include renewal options and , in certain leases , purchase options . future minimum commitments for capital lease obligations ( including sale-leasebacks accounted for as financings ) and for operating lease obligations having initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in millions ) capital obligations ( a ) operating obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>capital lease obligations ( a )</td><td>operating lease obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>45</td><td>133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>47</td><td>110</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>60</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>39</td><td>85</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>426</td><td>379</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>sublease rentals</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 657</td><td>$ 967</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less imputed interest costs</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 459</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( a ) capital lease obligations includes $ 335 million related to assets under construction as of december 31 , 2008 . these leases are currently reported in long-term debt based on percentage of construction completed at $ 126 million . in connection with past sales of various plants and operations , we assigned and the purchasers assumed certain leases of major equipment used in the divested plants and operations of united states steel . in the event of a default by any of the purchasers , united states steel has assumed these obligations ; however , we remain primarily obligated for payments under these leases . minimum lease payments under these operating lease obligations of $ 21 million have been included above and an equal amount has been reported as sublease rentals . of the $ 459 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 69 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement. .
Question: as of december 31, 2008, what would have been, in millions, the total undiscounted minimum capital lease obligations excluding the assets under construction?
Answer: 322.0
Question: and what percentage of that construction is already completed?
| 0.37612 |
CONVFINQA9091 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operations may be extended up to four additional years for each unit by mutual agreement of entergy and new york state based on an exigent reliability need for indian point generation . in accordance with the ferc-approved tariff of the new york independent system operator ( nyiso ) , entergy submitted to the nyiso a notice of generator deactivation based on the dates in the settlement ( no later than april 30 , 2020 for indian point unit 2 and april 30 , 2021 for indian point unit 3 ) . in december 2017 , nyiso issued a report stating there will not be a system reliability need following the deactivation of indian point . the nyiso also has advised that it will perform an analysis of the potential competitive impacts of the proposed retirement under provisions of its tariff . the deadline for the nyiso to make a withholding determination is in dispute and is pending before the ferc . in addition to contractually agreeing to cease commercial operations early , in february 2017 entergy filed with the nrc an amendment to its license renewal application changing the term of the requested licenses to coincide with the latest possible extension by mutual agreement based on exigent reliability needs : april 30 , 2024 for indian point 2 and april 30 , 2025 for indian point 3 . if entergy reasonably determines that the nrc will treat the amendment other than as a routine amendment , entergy may withdraw the amendment . other provisions of the settlement include termination of all then-existing investigations of indian point by the agencies signing the agreement , which include the new york state department of environmental conservation , the new york state department of state , the new york state department of public service , the new york state department of health , and the new york state attorney general . the settlement recognizes the right of new york state agencies to pursue new investigations and enforcement actions with respect to new circumstances or existing conditions that become materially exacerbated . another provision of the settlement obligates entergy to establish a $ 15 million fund for environmental projects and community support . apportionment and allocation of funds to beneficiaries are to be determined by mutual agreement of new york state and entergy . the settlement recognizes new york state 2019s right to perform an annual inspection of indian point , with scope and timing to be determined by mutual agreement . in may 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging new york state 2019s actions in signing and implementing the indian point settlement with entergy on the basis that the state failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions . all signatories to the settlement agreement , including the entergy affiliates that hold nrc licenses for indian point , were named . the appeals were voluntarily dismissed in november 2017 . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital ratio for entergy as of december 31 , 2017 is primarily due to an increase in commercial paper outstanding in 2017 as compared to 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>67.1% ( 67.1 % )</td><td>64.8% ( 64.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) )</td><td>( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>66.3% ( 66.3 % )</td><td>63.8% ( 63.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td><td>( 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>65.2% ( 65.2 % )</td><td>61.8% ( 61.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , new orleans , and texas securitization bonds , which are non- recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in debt to capital from 2016 to 2017?
| 2.3 |
CONVFINQA9092 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operations may be extended up to four additional years for each unit by mutual agreement of entergy and new york state based on an exigent reliability need for indian point generation . in accordance with the ferc-approved tariff of the new york independent system operator ( nyiso ) , entergy submitted to the nyiso a notice of generator deactivation based on the dates in the settlement ( no later than april 30 , 2020 for indian point unit 2 and april 30 , 2021 for indian point unit 3 ) . in december 2017 , nyiso issued a report stating there will not be a system reliability need following the deactivation of indian point . the nyiso also has advised that it will perform an analysis of the potential competitive impacts of the proposed retirement under provisions of its tariff . the deadline for the nyiso to make a withholding determination is in dispute and is pending before the ferc . in addition to contractually agreeing to cease commercial operations early , in february 2017 entergy filed with the nrc an amendment to its license renewal application changing the term of the requested licenses to coincide with the latest possible extension by mutual agreement based on exigent reliability needs : april 30 , 2024 for indian point 2 and april 30 , 2025 for indian point 3 . if entergy reasonably determines that the nrc will treat the amendment other than as a routine amendment , entergy may withdraw the amendment . other provisions of the settlement include termination of all then-existing investigations of indian point by the agencies signing the agreement , which include the new york state department of environmental conservation , the new york state department of state , the new york state department of public service , the new york state department of health , and the new york state attorney general . the settlement recognizes the right of new york state agencies to pursue new investigations and enforcement actions with respect to new circumstances or existing conditions that become materially exacerbated . another provision of the settlement obligates entergy to establish a $ 15 million fund for environmental projects and community support . apportionment and allocation of funds to beneficiaries are to be determined by mutual agreement of new york state and entergy . the settlement recognizes new york state 2019s right to perform an annual inspection of indian point , with scope and timing to be determined by mutual agreement . in may 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging new york state 2019s actions in signing and implementing the indian point settlement with entergy on the basis that the state failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions . all signatories to the settlement agreement , including the entergy affiliates that hold nrc licenses for indian point , were named . the appeals were voluntarily dismissed in november 2017 . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital ratio for entergy as of december 31 , 2017 is primarily due to an increase in commercial paper outstanding in 2017 as compared to 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>67.1% ( 67.1 % )</td><td>64.8% ( 64.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) )</td><td>( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>66.3% ( 66.3 % )</td><td>63.8% ( 63.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td><td>( 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>65.2% ( 65.2 % )</td><td>61.8% ( 61.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , new orleans , and texas securitization bonds , which are non- recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in debt to capital from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 2.3
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the debt to capital in 2016, in percentage?
| 0.03549 |
CONVFINQA9093 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements . 2011 versus 2010 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 . the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses . during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 12944</td><td>$ 12223</td><td>$ 15376</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . bank payrolltax</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees</td><td>2208</td><td>2463</td><td>2281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market development</td><td>509</td><td>640</td><td>530</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>communications and technology</td><td>782</td><td>828</td><td>758</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>1738</td><td>1865</td><td>1889</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>occupancy</td><td>875</td><td>1030</td><td>1086</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>professional fees</td><td>867</td><td>992</td><td>927</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>insurance reserves1</td><td>598</td><td>529</td><td>398</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other expenses</td><td>2435</td><td>2072</td><td>2559</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total non-compensation expenses</td><td>10012</td><td>10419</td><td>10428</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 22956</td><td>$ 22642</td><td>$ 26269</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total staff atperiod-end2</td><td>32400</td><td>33300</td><td>35700</td></tr></table> total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings . 2 . includes employees , consultants and temporary staff . 48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the net change in total operating expenses in 2012?
| 314.0 |
CONVFINQA9094 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements . 2011 versus 2010 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 . the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses . during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 12944</td><td>$ 12223</td><td>$ 15376</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . bank payrolltax</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees</td><td>2208</td><td>2463</td><td>2281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market development</td><td>509</td><td>640</td><td>530</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>communications and technology</td><td>782</td><td>828</td><td>758</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>1738</td><td>1865</td><td>1889</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>occupancy</td><td>875</td><td>1030</td><td>1086</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>professional fees</td><td>867</td><td>992</td><td>927</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>insurance reserves1</td><td>598</td><td>529</td><td>398</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other expenses</td><td>2435</td><td>2072</td><td>2559</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total non-compensation expenses</td><td>10012</td><td>10419</td><td>10428</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 22956</td><td>$ 22642</td><td>$ 26269</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total staff atperiod-end2</td><td>32400</td><td>33300</td><td>35700</td></tr></table> total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings . 2 . includes employees , consultants and temporary staff . 48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the net change in total operating expenses in 2012?
Answer: 314.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.01387 |
CONVFINQA9095 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements . 2011 versus 2010 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 . the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses . during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 12944</td><td>$ 12223</td><td>$ 15376</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . bank payrolltax</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees</td><td>2208</td><td>2463</td><td>2281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market development</td><td>509</td><td>640</td><td>530</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>communications and technology</td><td>782</td><td>828</td><td>758</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>1738</td><td>1865</td><td>1889</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>occupancy</td><td>875</td><td>1030</td><td>1086</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>professional fees</td><td>867</td><td>992</td><td>927</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>insurance reserves1</td><td>598</td><td>529</td><td>398</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other expenses</td><td>2435</td><td>2072</td><td>2559</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total non-compensation expenses</td><td>10012</td><td>10419</td><td>10428</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 22956</td><td>$ 22642</td><td>$ 26269</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total staff atperiod-end2</td><td>32400</td><td>33300</td><td>35700</td></tr></table> total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings . 2 . includes employees , consultants and temporary staff . 48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the net change in total operating expenses in 2012?
Answer: 314.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.01387
Question: what is the number of staff in 2012?
| 32400.0 |
CONVFINQA9096 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements . 2011 versus 2010 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 . the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses . during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 12944</td><td>$ 12223</td><td>$ 15376</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . bank payrolltax</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees</td><td>2208</td><td>2463</td><td>2281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market development</td><td>509</td><td>640</td><td>530</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>communications and technology</td><td>782</td><td>828</td><td>758</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>1738</td><td>1865</td><td>1889</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>occupancy</td><td>875</td><td>1030</td><td>1086</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>professional fees</td><td>867</td><td>992</td><td>927</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>insurance reserves1</td><td>598</td><td>529</td><td>398</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other expenses</td><td>2435</td><td>2072</td><td>2559</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total non-compensation expenses</td><td>10012</td><td>10419</td><td>10428</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 22956</td><td>$ 22642</td><td>$ 26269</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total staff atperiod-end2</td><td>32400</td><td>33300</td><td>35700</td></tr></table> total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings . 2 . includes employees , consultants and temporary staff . 48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the net change in total operating expenses in 2012?
Answer: 314.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.01387
Question: what is the number of staff in 2012?
Answer: 32400.0
Question: what about in 2011?
| 33300.0 |
CONVFINQA9097 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements . 2011 versus 2010 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 . the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses . during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 12944</td><td>$ 12223</td><td>$ 15376</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . bank payrolltax</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees</td><td>2208</td><td>2463</td><td>2281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market development</td><td>509</td><td>640</td><td>530</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>communications and technology</td><td>782</td><td>828</td><td>758</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>1738</td><td>1865</td><td>1889</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>occupancy</td><td>875</td><td>1030</td><td>1086</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>professional fees</td><td>867</td><td>992</td><td>927</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>insurance reserves1</td><td>598</td><td>529</td><td>398</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other expenses</td><td>2435</td><td>2072</td><td>2559</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total non-compensation expenses</td><td>10012</td><td>10419</td><td>10428</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 22956</td><td>$ 22642</td><td>$ 26269</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total staff atperiod-end2</td><td>32400</td><td>33300</td><td>35700</td></tr></table> total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings . 2 . includes employees , consultants and temporary staff . 48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the net change in total operating expenses in 2012?
Answer: 314.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.01387
Question: what is the number of staff in 2012?
Answer: 32400.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 33300.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -900.0 |
CONVFINQA9098 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements . 2011 versus 2010 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 . the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses . during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td><td>year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 12944</td><td>$ 12223</td><td>$ 15376</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . bank payrolltax</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees</td><td>2208</td><td>2463</td><td>2281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market development</td><td>509</td><td>640</td><td>530</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>communications and technology</td><td>782</td><td>828</td><td>758</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>1738</td><td>1865</td><td>1889</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>occupancy</td><td>875</td><td>1030</td><td>1086</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>professional fees</td><td>867</td><td>992</td><td>927</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>insurance reserves1</td><td>598</td><td>529</td><td>398</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other expenses</td><td>2435</td><td>2072</td><td>2559</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total non-compensation expenses</td><td>10012</td><td>10419</td><td>10428</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 22956</td><td>$ 22642</td><td>$ 26269</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total staff atperiod-end2</td><td>32400</td><td>33300</td><td>35700</td></tr></table> total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings . 2 . includes employees , consultants and temporary staff . 48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what is the net change in total operating expenses in 2012?
Answer: 314.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.01387
Question: what is the number of staff in 2012?
Answer: 32400.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 33300.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -900.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.02703 |
CONVFINQA9099 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 6.60 billion , 4% ( 4 % ) lower than 2016 , primarily due to lower commissions and fees , reflecting a decline in our listed cash equity volumes in the u.s . market volumes in the u.s . also declined . in addition , net revenues in equities client execution were lower , reflecting lower net revenues in derivatives , partially offset by higher net revenues in cash products . net revenues in securities services were essentially unchanged . operating expenses were $ 9.69 billion for 2017 , essentially unchanged compared with 2016 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting lower net revenues , largely offset by increased technology expenses , reflecting higher expenses related to cloud-based services and software depreciation , and increased consulting costs . pre-tax earnings were $ 2.21 billion in 2017 , 54% ( 54 % ) lower than 2016 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , including through our merchant banking business and our special situations group , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities . some of these investments are made indirectly through funds that we manage . we also make unsecured loans through our digital platform , marcus : by goldman sachs and secured loans through our digital platform , goldman sachs private bank select . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2018</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 4455</td><td>$ 4578</td><td>$ 2573</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>3795</td><td>2660</td><td>1689</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>8250</td><td>7238</td><td>4262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>674</td><td>657</td><td>182</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>3365</td><td>2796</td><td>2386</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>pre-taxearnings</td><td>$ 4211</td><td>$ 3785</td><td>$ 1694</td></tr></table> operating environment . during 2018 , our investments in private equities benefited from company-specific events , including sales , and strong corporate performance , while investments in public equities reflected losses , as global equity prices generally decreased . results for our investments in debt securities and loans reflected continued growth in loans receivables , resulting in higher net interest income . if macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or the origination of loans , or if global equity prices continue to decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . during 2017 , generally higher global equity prices and tighter credit spreads contributed to a favorable environment for our equity and debt investments . results also reflected net gains from company-specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . 2018 versus 2017 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 8.25 billion for 2018 , 14% ( 14 % ) higher than 2017 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.46 billion , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2017 , reflecting net losses from investments in public equities ( 2018 included $ 183 million of net losses ) compared with net gains in the prior year , partially offset by significantly higher net gains from investments in private equities ( 2018 included $ 4.64 billion of net gains ) , driven by company-specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . for 2018 , 60% ( 60 % ) of the net revenues in equity securities were generated from corporate investments and 40% ( 40 % ) were generated from real estate . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 3.80 billion , 43% ( 43 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily driven by significantly higher net interest income . 2018 included net interest income of approximately $ 2.70 billion compared with approximately $ 1.80 billion in 2017 . provision for credit losses was $ 674 million for 2018 , compared with $ 657 million for 2017 , as the higher provision for credit losses primarily related to consumer loan growth in 2018 was partially offset by an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured loan in 2017 . operating expenses were $ 3.37 billion for 2018 , 20% ( 20 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to increased expenses related to consolidated investments and our digital lending and deposit platform , and increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.21 billion in 2018 , 11% ( 11 % ) higher than 2017 versus 2016 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.24 billion for 2017 , 70% ( 70 % ) higher than 2016 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.58 billion , 78% ( 78 % ) higher than 2016 , primarily reflecting a significant increase in net gains from private equities ( 2017 included $ 3.82 billion of net gains ) , which were positively impacted by company-specific events and corporate performance . in addition , net gains from public equities ( 2017 included $ 762 million of net gains ) were significantly higher , as global equity prices increased during the year . for 2017 , 64% ( 64 % ) of the net revenues in equity securities were generated from corporate investments and 36% ( 36 % ) were generated from real estate . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 2.66 billion , 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2016 , reflecting significantly higher net interest income ( 2017 included approximately $ 1.80 billion of net interest income ) . 60 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2018?
| 8250.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.