id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA9200 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
facility continue to have a maturity date of october 2016 . in addition , the maturity date of the company's revolving credit facility was extended to october 2018 and the facility was increased to $ 900 million from $ 600 million . accordingly , the amended credit agreement consists of the term c-2 loan facility , the term c-3 loan facility and a $ 900 million revolving credit facility . net deferred financing costs are as follows : net deferred financing costs ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>net deferred financing costs ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>as of december 31 2011</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>financing costs deferred ( 1 )</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity ( 2 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>as of december 31 2012</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>financing costs deferred ( 3 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amortization</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>as of december 31 2013</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>financing costs deferred ( 4 )</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>amortization</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>as of december 31 2014</td><td>27</td></tr></table> ____________________________ ( 1 ) relates to the issuance of the 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes . ( 2 ) relates to the $ 400 million prepayment of the term c loan facility with proceeds from the 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes . ( 3 ) relates to the september 2013 amendment to the celanese us existing senior secured credit facilities to reduce the interest rates payable in connection with certain borrowings thereby creating the term c-2 loan facility due 2016 . ( 4 ) includes $ 6 million related to the issuance of the 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) notes and $ 4 million related to the september 24 , 2014 amendment to the celanese us existing senior secured credit facilities . ( 5 ) includes $ 4 million related to the 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) notes redemption and $ 1 million related to the term c-2 loan facility conversion . as of december 31 , 2014 , the margin for borrowings under the term c-2 loan facility was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) above the euro interbank offered rate ( "euribor" ) and the margin for borrowings under the term c-3 loan facility was 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) above libor ( for us dollars ) and 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) above euribor ( for euros ) , as applicable . as of december 31 , 2014 , the margin for borrowings under the revolving credit facility was 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) above libor . the margin for borrowings under the revolving credit facility is subject to increase or decrease in certain circumstances based on changes in the corporate credit ratings of celanese or celanese us . term loan borrowings under the amended credit agreement are subject to amortization at 1% ( 1 % ) of the initial principal amount per annum , payable quarterly . in addition , the company pays quarterly commitment fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) per annum . the amended credit agreement is guaranteed by celanese and certain domestic subsidiaries of celanese us and is secured by a lien on substantially all assets of celanese us and such guarantors , subject to certain agreed exceptions ( including for certain real property and certain shares of foreign subsidiaries ) , pursuant to the guarantee and collateral agreement , dated april 2 , as a condition to borrowing funds or requesting letters of credit be issued under the revolving credit facility , the company's first lien senior secured leverage ratio ( as calculated as of the last day of the most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered under the revolving facility ) cannot exceed the threshold as specified below . further , the company's first lien senior secured leverage ratio must be maintained at or below that threshold while any amounts are outstanding under the revolving credit facility. .
Question: what would the annual fee for the revolver be, assuming its undrawn?
Answer: 2.25
Question: and converted to the millions?
Answer: 2250000.0
Question: how much of the 2013 amortization expense is due to the term c-2 loan facility conversion?
| 0.2 |
CONVFINQA9201 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what is the total number of shares purchased in october times the average price per share?
| 43966095.94 |
CONVFINQA9202 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what is the total number of shares purchased in october times the average price per share?
Answer: 43966095.94
Question: what is that simplified?
| 43.9661 |
CONVFINQA9203 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 644.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-35.1 ( 35.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-5.9 ( 5.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>19.0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>4.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 626.8</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .
Question: what was the net difference in net revenue from 2016 to 2017?
| 17.4 |
CONVFINQA9204 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 644.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-35.1 ( 35.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-5.9 ( 5.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>19.0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>4.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 626.8</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .
Question: what was the net difference in net revenue from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 17.4
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.02701 |
CONVFINQA9205 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. .
Question: what were the number of new sites acquired and constructed in the u.s. in 2015?
| 11595.0 |
CONVFINQA9206 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. .
Question: what were the number of new sites acquired and constructed in the u.s. in 2015?
Answer: 11595.0
Question: what were the number of sites in asia?
| 2330.0 |
CONVFINQA9207 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. .
Question: what were the number of new sites acquired and constructed in the u.s. in 2015?
Answer: 11595.0
Question: what were the number of sites in asia?
Answer: 2330.0
Question: what is the sum of those?
| 13925.0 |
CONVFINQA9208 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. .
Question: what were the number of new sites acquired and constructed in the u.s. in 2015?
Answer: 11595.0
Question: what were the number of sites in asia?
Answer: 2330.0
Question: what is the sum of those?
Answer: 13925.0
Question: what is the sum including emea?
| 18835.0 |
CONVFINQA9209 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. .
Question: what were the number of new sites acquired and constructed in the u.s. in 2015?
Answer: 11595.0
Question: what were the number of sites in asia?
Answer: 2330.0
Question: what is the sum of those?
Answer: 13925.0
Question: what is the sum including emea?
Answer: 18835.0
Question: what is the total sum including latin america?
| 25370.0 |
CONVFINQA9210 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
undistributed earnings of $ 696.9 million from certain foreign subsidiaries are considered to be permanently reinvested abroad and will not be repatriated to the united states in the foreseeable future . because those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested , no domestic federal or state deferred income taxes have been provided thereon . if we were to make a distribution of any portion of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise , we would be subject to both u.s . income taxes ( subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits ) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign jurisdictions . because of the availability of u.s . foreign tax credit carryforwards , it is not practicable to determine the domestic federal income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were no longer considered to be reinvested indefinitely . a valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . changes to our valuation allowance during the years ended may 31 , 2015 and 2014 are summarized below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at may 31 2013</td><td>$ -28464 ( 28464 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards</td><td>2822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for foreign tax credit carryforward</td><td>18061</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at may 31 2014</td><td>-7199 ( 7199 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards</td><td>3387</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at may 31 2015</td><td>$ -3823 ( 3823 )</td></tr></table> net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries totaling $ 12.4 million and u.s . net operating loss carryforwards previously acquired totaling $ 19.8 million at may 31 , 2015 will expire between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2033 if not utilized . capital loss carryforwards of u.s . subsidiaries totaling $ 4.7 million will expire if not utilized by may 31 , 2017 . tax credit carryforwards totaling $ 8.4 million at may 31 , 2015 will expire between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2023 if not utilized . we conduct business globally and file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions . in the normal course of business , we are subject to examination by taxing authorities around the world . as a result of events that occurred in the fourth quarter of the year ended may 31 , 2015 , management concluded that it was more likely than not that the tax positions in a foreign jurisdiction , for which we had recorded estimated liabilities of $ 65.6 million in other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet , would be sustained on their technical merits based on information available as of may 31 , 2015 . therefore , the liability and corresponding deferred tax assets were eliminated as of may 31 , 2015 . the uncertain tax positions have been subject to an ongoing examination in that foreign jurisdiction by the tax authority . discussions and correspondence between the tax authority and us during the fourth quarter indicated that the likelihood of the positions being sustained had increased . subsequent to may 31 , 2015 , we received a final closure notice regarding the examination resulting in no adjustments to taxable income related to this matter for the tax returns filed for the periods ended may 31 , 2010 through may 31 , 2013 . the unrecognized tax benefits were effectively settled with this final closure notice . we are no longer subjected to state income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2008 , u.s . federal income tax examinations for fiscal years prior to 2012 and united kingdom federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2013 . 78 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report .
Question: combined, what was the total net operating loss that must be utilized before expiration between 2017 and 2033?
| 32.2 |
CONVFINQA9211 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
undistributed earnings of $ 696.9 million from certain foreign subsidiaries are considered to be permanently reinvested abroad and will not be repatriated to the united states in the foreseeable future . because those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested , no domestic federal or state deferred income taxes have been provided thereon . if we were to make a distribution of any portion of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise , we would be subject to both u.s . income taxes ( subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits ) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign jurisdictions . because of the availability of u.s . foreign tax credit carryforwards , it is not practicable to determine the domestic federal income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were no longer considered to be reinvested indefinitely . a valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . changes to our valuation allowance during the years ended may 31 , 2015 and 2014 are summarized below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at may 31 2013</td><td>$ -28464 ( 28464 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards</td><td>2822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for foreign tax credit carryforward</td><td>18061</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at may 31 2014</td><td>-7199 ( 7199 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards</td><td>3387</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at may 31 2015</td><td>$ -3823 ( 3823 )</td></tr></table> net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries totaling $ 12.4 million and u.s . net operating loss carryforwards previously acquired totaling $ 19.8 million at may 31 , 2015 will expire between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2033 if not utilized . capital loss carryforwards of u.s . subsidiaries totaling $ 4.7 million will expire if not utilized by may 31 , 2017 . tax credit carryforwards totaling $ 8.4 million at may 31 , 2015 will expire between may 31 , 2017 and may 31 , 2023 if not utilized . we conduct business globally and file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions . in the normal course of business , we are subject to examination by taxing authorities around the world . as a result of events that occurred in the fourth quarter of the year ended may 31 , 2015 , management concluded that it was more likely than not that the tax positions in a foreign jurisdiction , for which we had recorded estimated liabilities of $ 65.6 million in other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet , would be sustained on their technical merits based on information available as of may 31 , 2015 . therefore , the liability and corresponding deferred tax assets were eliminated as of may 31 , 2015 . the uncertain tax positions have been subject to an ongoing examination in that foreign jurisdiction by the tax authority . discussions and correspondence between the tax authority and us during the fourth quarter indicated that the likelihood of the positions being sustained had increased . subsequent to may 31 , 2015 , we received a final closure notice regarding the examination resulting in no adjustments to taxable income related to this matter for the tax returns filed for the periods ended may 31 , 2010 through may 31 , 2013 . the unrecognized tax benefits were effectively settled with this final closure notice . we are no longer subjected to state income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2008 , u.s . federal income tax examinations for fiscal years prior to 2012 and united kingdom federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2013 . 78 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report .
Question: combined, what was the total net operating loss that must be utilized before expiration between 2017 and 2033?
Answer: 32.2
Question: what was the change in the balance between 2013 and 2015?
| 24641.0 |
CONVFINQA9212 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .
Question: what is the value of total long-term debt 2013 kmp?
| 10282.8 |
CONVFINQA9213 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .
Question: what is the value of total long-term debt 2013 kmp?
Answer: 10282.8
Question: what is the current portion of long-term debt?
| 1263.3 |
CONVFINQA9214 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .
Question: what is the value of total long-term debt 2013 kmp?
Answer: 10282.8
Question: what is the current portion of long-term debt?
Answer: 1263.3
Question: what is the sum?
| 11546.1 |
CONVFINQA9215 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .
Question: what is the value of total long-term debt 2013 kmp?
Answer: 10282.8
Question: what is the current portion of long-term debt?
Answer: 1263.3
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 11546.1
Question: what is the current portion over the sum?
| 0.10941 |
CONVFINQA9216 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
goodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , signifi- cant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is rec- ognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . the company did not recognize any impair- ment losses for the periods presented . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid ( inventory ) , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received ( ibnr ) and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , seasonality , utiliza- tion of healthcare services and other relevant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liabil- ity for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2005 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the majority of the company 2019s medicaid managed care premi- um revenue is received monthly based on fixed rates per member as determined by state contracts . some contracts allow for addi- tional premium related to certain supplemental services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenue is recognized as earned over the covered period of services . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this membership and eligibility data . these adjustments are immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . premiums collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . the specialty services segment generates revenue under con- tracts with state and local government entities , our health plans and third-party customers . revenues for services are recognized when the services are provided or as ratably earned over the cov- ered period of services . for performance-based contracts , the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . such amounts are recorded as unearned revenue . revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>80</td><td>407</td><td>472</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under contracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2006 and august 31 , 2008 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 18% ( 18 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) , 22% ( 22 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 per member , up to a lifetime maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are respon- sible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . reinsurance recoveries were $ 4014 , $ 3730 , and $ 5345 , in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments . interest expense relates to borrowings under our credit facility , mortgage interest , interest on capital leases and credit facility fees . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled . the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change . valuation allowances are provided when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized . in determining if a deductible temporary difference or net operating loss can be realized , the company considers future reversals of .
Question: what was the change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2004 to 2005?
| -119.0 |
CONVFINQA9217 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
goodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , signifi- cant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is rec- ognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . the company did not recognize any impair- ment losses for the periods presented . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid ( inventory ) , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received ( ibnr ) and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , seasonality , utiliza- tion of healthcare services and other relevant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liabil- ity for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2005 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the majority of the company 2019s medicaid managed care premi- um revenue is received monthly based on fixed rates per member as determined by state contracts . some contracts allow for addi- tional premium related to certain supplemental services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenue is recognized as earned over the covered period of services . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this membership and eligibility data . these adjustments are immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . premiums collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . the specialty services segment generates revenue under con- tracts with state and local government entities , our health plans and third-party customers . revenues for services are recognized when the services are provided or as ratably earned over the cov- ered period of services . for performance-based contracts , the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . such amounts are recorded as unearned revenue . revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>80</td><td>407</td><td>472</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under contracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2006 and august 31 , 2008 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 18% ( 18 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) , 22% ( 22 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 per member , up to a lifetime maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are respon- sible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . reinsurance recoveries were $ 4014 , $ 3730 , and $ 5345 , in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments . interest expense relates to borrowings under our credit facility , mortgage interest , interest on capital leases and credit facility fees . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled . the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change . valuation allowances are provided when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized . in determining if a deductible temporary difference or net operating loss can be realized , the company considers future reversals of .
Question: what was the change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2004 to 2005?
Answer: -119.0
Question: and what was that allowance in the end of 2004?
| 462.0 |
CONVFINQA9218 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
goodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , signifi- cant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is rec- ognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . the company did not recognize any impair- ment losses for the periods presented . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid ( inventory ) , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received ( ibnr ) and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , seasonality , utiliza- tion of healthcare services and other relevant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liabil- ity for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2005 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the majority of the company 2019s medicaid managed care premi- um revenue is received monthly based on fixed rates per member as determined by state contracts . some contracts allow for addi- tional premium related to certain supplemental services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenue is recognized as earned over the covered period of services . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this membership and eligibility data . these adjustments are immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . premiums collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . the specialty services segment generates revenue under con- tracts with state and local government entities , our health plans and third-party customers . revenues for services are recognized when the services are provided or as ratably earned over the cov- ered period of services . for performance-based contracts , the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . such amounts are recorded as unearned revenue . revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>80</td><td>407</td><td>472</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under contracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2006 and august 31 , 2008 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 18% ( 18 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) , 22% ( 22 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 per member , up to a lifetime maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are respon- sible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . reinsurance recoveries were $ 4014 , $ 3730 , and $ 5345 , in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments . interest expense relates to borrowings under our credit facility , mortgage interest , interest on capital leases and credit facility fees . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled . the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change . valuation allowances are provided when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized . in determining if a deductible temporary difference or net operating loss can be realized , the company considers future reversals of .
Question: what was the change in the allowance for uncollectible accounts from year end 2004 to 2005?
Answer: -119.0
Question: and what was that allowance in the end of 2004?
Answer: 462.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2004 allowance, in percentage?
| -0.25758 |
CONVFINQA9219 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . we made no further grants under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . we will make no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option plan . the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 14.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015 ( in thousands )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 30809</td><td>$ 21056</td><td>$ 29793</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ 9879</td><td>$ 6907</td><td>$ 7126</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 and thereafter either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . the performance units granted to certain executives in fiscal 2014 were based on a one-year performance period . after the compensation committee certified the performance results , 25% ( 25 % ) of the performance units converted to unrestricted shares . the remaining 75% ( 75 % ) converted to restricted shares that vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the conversion date . the performance units granted to certain executives during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 were based on a three-year performance period . after the compensation committee certifies the performance results for the three-year period , performance units earned will convert into unrestricted common stock . the compensation committee may set a range of possible performance-based outcomes for performance units . depending on the achievement of the performance measures , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . for awards with only performance conditions , we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period using the grant date fair value of the award , which is based on the number of shares expected to be earned according to the level of achievement of performance goals . if the number of shares expected to be earned were to change at any time during the performance period , we would make a cumulative adjustment to share-based compensation expense based on the revised number of shares expected to be earned . global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 83 .
Question: what was the difference in income tax benefit between 2014 and 2016?
| 2753.0 |
CONVFINQA9220 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . we made no further grants under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . we will make no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option plan . the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 14.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015 ( in thousands )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 30809</td><td>$ 21056</td><td>$ 29793</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ 9879</td><td>$ 6907</td><td>$ 7126</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 and thereafter either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . the performance units granted to certain executives in fiscal 2014 were based on a one-year performance period . after the compensation committee certified the performance results , 25% ( 25 % ) of the performance units converted to unrestricted shares . the remaining 75% ( 75 % ) converted to restricted shares that vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the conversion date . the performance units granted to certain executives during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 were based on a three-year performance period . after the compensation committee certifies the performance results for the three-year period , performance units earned will convert into unrestricted common stock . the compensation committee may set a range of possible performance-based outcomes for performance units . depending on the achievement of the performance measures , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . for awards with only performance conditions , we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period using the grant date fair value of the award , which is based on the number of shares expected to be earned according to the level of achievement of performance goals . if the number of shares expected to be earned were to change at any time during the performance period , we would make a cumulative adjustment to share-based compensation expense based on the revised number of shares expected to be earned . global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 83 .
Question: what was the difference in income tax benefit between 2014 and 2016?
Answer: 2753.0
Question: and the percentage increase during this time?
| 0.38633 |
CONVFINQA9221 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) were converted on a one-to-one basis from class eu ( series i , ii , iii ) common stock to class c ( series iii , ii , and iv ) common stock concurrent with the true-up . the results of the true-up are reflected in the table below . fractional shares resulting from the conversion of the shares of each individual stockholder have been rounded down . these fractional shares were paid in cash to stockholders as part of the initial redemption of class b common stock and class c common stock shortly following the ipo . outstanding regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization converted classes and series of common stock issued in the true-up number of regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization true-up conversion number of converted classes and series of common stock after the true-up class usa ( 1 ) class b ( 2 ) 426390481 0.93870 400251872 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>outstanding regional classes and seriesof common stock issued inthe reorganization</td><td>converted classes and series of common stock issued in the true-up</td><td>number of regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization</td><td>true-up conversion ratio</td><td>number of converted classes and series of common stock after the true-up</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>class usa ( 1 )</td><td>class b ( 2 )</td><td>426390481</td><td>0.93870</td><td>400251872</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class eu ( series i )</td><td>class c ( series iii )</td><td>62213201</td><td>1.00000</td><td>62213201</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class eu ( series ii )</td><td>class c ( series ii )</td><td>27904464</td><td>1.00000</td><td>27904464</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class eu ( series iii )</td><td>class c ( series iv )</td><td>549587</td><td>1.00000</td><td>549587</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class canada</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>22034685</td><td>0.98007</td><td>21595528</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>class ap</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>119100481</td><td>1.19043</td><td>141780635</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>class lac</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>80137915</td><td>1.07110</td><td>85835549</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>class cemea</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>36749698</td><td>0.95101</td><td>34949123</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the amount of the class usa common stock outstanding prior to the true-up is net of 131592008 shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company . ( 2 ) the amount of the class b common stock outstanding subsequent to the true-up is net of 123525418 shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company . also , the company issued 51844393 additional shares of class c ( series ii ) common stock at a price of $ 44 per share in exchange for a subscription receivable from visa europe . this issuance and subscription receivable were recorded as offsetting entries in temporary equity on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet at september 30 , 2008 . initial public offering in march 2008 , the company completed its ipo with the issuance of 446600000 shares of class a common stock at a net offering price of $ 42.77 ( the ipo price of $ 44.00 per share of class a common stock , less underwriting discounts and commissions of $ 1.23 per share ) . the company received net proceeds of $ 19.1 billion as a result of the ipo. .
Question: what was the amount gained with the issuance of the class a common stock in 2008?
| 19101082000.0 |
CONVFINQA9222 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) were converted on a one-to-one basis from class eu ( series i , ii , iii ) common stock to class c ( series iii , ii , and iv ) common stock concurrent with the true-up . the results of the true-up are reflected in the table below . fractional shares resulting from the conversion of the shares of each individual stockholder have been rounded down . these fractional shares were paid in cash to stockholders as part of the initial redemption of class b common stock and class c common stock shortly following the ipo . outstanding regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization converted classes and series of common stock issued in the true-up number of regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization true-up conversion number of converted classes and series of common stock after the true-up class usa ( 1 ) class b ( 2 ) 426390481 0.93870 400251872 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>outstanding regional classes and seriesof common stock issued inthe reorganization</td><td>converted classes and series of common stock issued in the true-up</td><td>number of regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization</td><td>true-up conversion ratio</td><td>number of converted classes and series of common stock after the true-up</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>class usa ( 1 )</td><td>class b ( 2 )</td><td>426390481</td><td>0.93870</td><td>400251872</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class eu ( series i )</td><td>class c ( series iii )</td><td>62213201</td><td>1.00000</td><td>62213201</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class eu ( series ii )</td><td>class c ( series ii )</td><td>27904464</td><td>1.00000</td><td>27904464</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class eu ( series iii )</td><td>class c ( series iv )</td><td>549587</td><td>1.00000</td><td>549587</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class canada</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>22034685</td><td>0.98007</td><td>21595528</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>class ap</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>119100481</td><td>1.19043</td><td>141780635</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>class lac</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>80137915</td><td>1.07110</td><td>85835549</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>class cemea</td><td>class c ( series i )</td><td>36749698</td><td>0.95101</td><td>34949123</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the amount of the class usa common stock outstanding prior to the true-up is net of 131592008 shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company . ( 2 ) the amount of the class b common stock outstanding subsequent to the true-up is net of 123525418 shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company . also , the company issued 51844393 additional shares of class c ( series ii ) common stock at a price of $ 44 per share in exchange for a subscription receivable from visa europe . this issuance and subscription receivable were recorded as offsetting entries in temporary equity on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet at september 30 , 2008 . initial public offering in march 2008 , the company completed its ipo with the issuance of 446600000 shares of class a common stock at a net offering price of $ 42.77 ( the ipo price of $ 44.00 per share of class a common stock , less underwriting discounts and commissions of $ 1.23 per share ) . the company received net proceeds of $ 19.1 billion as a result of the ipo. .
Question: what was the amount gained with the issuance of the class a common stock in 2008?
Answer: 19101082000.0
Question: and as of september of that year, what was the difference in the number of shares of the class usa common stock pre and after true-up?
| 26138609.0 |
CONVFINQA9223 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
unit shipments increased 49% ( 49 % ) to 217.4 million units in 2006 , compared to 146.0 million units in 2005 . the overall increase was driven by increased unit shipments of products for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by decreased unit shipments of products for iden technology . for the full year 2006 , unit shipments by the segment increased in all regions . due to the segment 2019s increase in unit shipments outpacing overall growth in the worldwide handset market , which grew approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 , the segment believes that it expanded its global handset market share to an estimated 22% ( 22 % ) for the full year 2006 . in 2006 , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) compared to 2005 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the geographic and product-tier mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 and increased approximately 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . asp is impacted by numerous factors , including product mix , market conditions and competitive product offerings , and asp trends often vary over time . in 2006 , the largest of the segment 2019s end customers ( including sales through distributors ) were china mobile , verizon , sprint nextel , cingular , and t-mobile . these five largest customers accounted for approximately 39% ( 39 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2006 . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sold products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 38% ( 38 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 65% ( 65 % ) of the segment 2019s 2006 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were china , brazil , the united kingdom and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol ( 201cip 201d ) video and broadcast network interactive set-tops ( 201cdigital entertainment devices 201d ) , end-to- end video delivery solutions , broadband access infrastructure systems , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment ( 201cbroadband gateways 201d ) to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems ( 201cwireless networks 201d ) , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers . in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 . ( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2007 20142006 2006 20142005 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2005</td><td>years ended december 31 2007 20142006</td><td>2006 20142005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>$ 9037</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>1232</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 36 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142007 compared to 2006 in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) to $ 10.0 billion , compared to $ 9.2 billion in 2006 . the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects a 27% ( 27 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decrease in net sales of wireless networks . net sales of digital entertainment devices increased approximately 43% ( 43 % ) , reflecting increased demand for digital set-tops , including hd/dvr set-tops and ip set-tops , partially offset by a decline in asp due to a product mix shift towards all-digital set-tops . unit shipments of digital entertainment devices increased 51% ( 51 % ) to 15.2 million units . net sales of broadband gateways increased approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , primarily due to higher net sales of data modems , driven by net sales from the netopia business acquired in february 2007 . net sales of wireless networks decreased 1% ( 1 % ) , primarily driven by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , despite competitive pricing pressure . on a geographic basis , the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects higher net sales in all geographic regions . the increase in net sales in north america was driven primarily by higher sales of digital entertainment devices , partially offset by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in asia was primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower net sales of cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in emea was , primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower demand for iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 . 60 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
Question: what was the change in the operating earnings from 2005 to 2007?
| -523.0 |
CONVFINQA9224 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
unit shipments increased 49% ( 49 % ) to 217.4 million units in 2006 , compared to 146.0 million units in 2005 . the overall increase was driven by increased unit shipments of products for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by decreased unit shipments of products for iden technology . for the full year 2006 , unit shipments by the segment increased in all regions . due to the segment 2019s increase in unit shipments outpacing overall growth in the worldwide handset market , which grew approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 , the segment believes that it expanded its global handset market share to an estimated 22% ( 22 % ) for the full year 2006 . in 2006 , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) compared to 2005 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the geographic and product-tier mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 and increased approximately 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . asp is impacted by numerous factors , including product mix , market conditions and competitive product offerings , and asp trends often vary over time . in 2006 , the largest of the segment 2019s end customers ( including sales through distributors ) were china mobile , verizon , sprint nextel , cingular , and t-mobile . these five largest customers accounted for approximately 39% ( 39 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2006 . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sold products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 38% ( 38 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 65% ( 65 % ) of the segment 2019s 2006 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were china , brazil , the united kingdom and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol ( 201cip 201d ) video and broadcast network interactive set-tops ( 201cdigital entertainment devices 201d ) , end-to- end video delivery solutions , broadband access infrastructure systems , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment ( 201cbroadband gateways 201d ) to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems ( 201cwireless networks 201d ) , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers . in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 . ( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2007 20142006 2006 20142005 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2005</td><td>years ended december 31 2007 20142006</td><td>2006 20142005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>$ 9037</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>1232</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 36 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142007 compared to 2006 in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) to $ 10.0 billion , compared to $ 9.2 billion in 2006 . the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects a 27% ( 27 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decrease in net sales of wireless networks . net sales of digital entertainment devices increased approximately 43% ( 43 % ) , reflecting increased demand for digital set-tops , including hd/dvr set-tops and ip set-tops , partially offset by a decline in asp due to a product mix shift towards all-digital set-tops . unit shipments of digital entertainment devices increased 51% ( 51 % ) to 15.2 million units . net sales of broadband gateways increased approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , primarily due to higher net sales of data modems , driven by net sales from the netopia business acquired in february 2007 . net sales of wireless networks decreased 1% ( 1 % ) , primarily driven by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , despite competitive pricing pressure . on a geographic basis , the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects higher net sales in all geographic regions . the increase in net sales in north america was driven primarily by higher sales of digital entertainment devices , partially offset by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in asia was primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower net sales of cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in emea was , primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower demand for iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 . 60 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
Question: what was the change in the operating earnings from 2005 to 2007?
Answer: -523.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those operating earnings in 2005, in percentage?
| -0.42451 |
CONVFINQA9225 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis stock restrict the amount of retained earnings available for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy arkansas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy arkansas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy arkansas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in entergy arkansas 2019s corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy arkansas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td><td>$ 17531</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2017 . the $ 150 million credit facility allows entergy arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support commercial paper issued by the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc and the tennessee regulatory authority ; the current authorizations extend through december 2018. .
Question: what was the balance of money pool in 2016?
| 51232.0 |
CONVFINQA9226 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis stock restrict the amount of retained earnings available for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy arkansas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy arkansas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy arkansas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in entergy arkansas 2019s corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy arkansas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td><td>$ 17531</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2017 . the $ 150 million credit facility allows entergy arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support commercial paper issued by the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc and the tennessee regulatory authority ; the current authorizations extend through december 2018. .
Question: what was the balance of money pool in 2016?
Answer: 51232.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
| 52742.0 |
CONVFINQA9227 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis stock restrict the amount of retained earnings available for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy arkansas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy arkansas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy arkansas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in entergy arkansas 2019s corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy arkansas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td><td>$ 17531</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2017 . the $ 150 million credit facility allows entergy arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support commercial paper issued by the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc and the tennessee regulatory authority ; the current authorizations extend through december 2018. .
Question: what was the balance of money pool in 2016?
Answer: 51232.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 52742.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| -1510.0 |
CONVFINQA9228 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis stock restrict the amount of retained earnings available for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy arkansas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy arkansas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy arkansas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in entergy arkansas 2019s corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy arkansas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td><td>$ 17531</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2017 . the $ 150 million credit facility allows entergy arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support commercial paper issued by the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc and the tennessee regulatory authority ; the current authorizations extend through december 2018. .
Question: what was the balance of money pool in 2016?
Answer: 51232.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 52742.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -1510.0
Question: and in the five years after this period, what is the total amount of the credit facilities that are going to expire, in millions?
| 170.0 |
CONVFINQA9229 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mondavi produces , markets and sells premium , super-premium and fine california wines under the woodbridge by robert mondavi , robert mondavi private selection and robert mondavi winery brand names . woodbridge and robert mondavi private selection are the leading premium and super-premium wine brands by volume , respectively , in the united states . the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the company 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the pre- mium , super-premium and fine wine categories . the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally . the vast majority of robert mondavi 2019s sales are generated in the united states . the company intends to leverage the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure . the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure . the company and robert mondavi have complementary busi- nesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy . the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the fine wine sector within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets . the robert mondavi acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets . in par- ticular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom , united states and other wine markets . total consid- eration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million . additionally , the company expects to incur direct acquisition costs of $ 11.2 million . the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) . in accordance with the pur- chase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of robert mondavi , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies . the results of operations of the robert mondavi business are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statement of income since the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition . the company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets and liabilities , and refining its restructuring plan which is under development and will be finalized during the company 2019s year ending february 28 , 2006 ( see note19 ) . accordingly , the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement . estimated fair values at december 22 , 2004 , are as follows : {in thousands} . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 494788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>452902</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other assets</td><td>178823</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>186000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>590459</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1902972</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>309051</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>552060</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities acquired</td><td>861111</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 1041861</td></tr></table> the trademarks are not subject to amortization . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in connection with the robert mondavi acquisition and robert mondavi 2019s previously disclosed intention to sell certain of its winery properties and related assets , and other vineyard prop- erties , the company has classified certain assets as held for sale as of february 28 , 2005 . the company expects to sell these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 , for net pro- ceeds of approximately $ 150 million to $ 175 million . no gain or loss is expected to be recognized upon the sale of these assets . hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock . as a result of the acquisition of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 . the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in winer- ies and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s market- ing and sales operations in the united kingdom . total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million . additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million . the acquisition date for accounting purposes is march 27 , 2003 . the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consider- ation . this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 . the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 mil- lion ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million .
Question: between the two acquisitions, was the purchase price for hardy greater than for mondavi?
| yes |
CONVFINQA9230 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mondavi produces , markets and sells premium , super-premium and fine california wines under the woodbridge by robert mondavi , robert mondavi private selection and robert mondavi winery brand names . woodbridge and robert mondavi private selection are the leading premium and super-premium wine brands by volume , respectively , in the united states . the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the company 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the pre- mium , super-premium and fine wine categories . the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally . the vast majority of robert mondavi 2019s sales are generated in the united states . the company intends to leverage the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure . the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure . the company and robert mondavi have complementary busi- nesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy . the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the fine wine sector within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets . the robert mondavi acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets . in par- ticular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom , united states and other wine markets . total consid- eration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million . additionally , the company expects to incur direct acquisition costs of $ 11.2 million . the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) . in accordance with the pur- chase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of robert mondavi , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies . the results of operations of the robert mondavi business are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statement of income since the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition . the company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets and liabilities , and refining its restructuring plan which is under development and will be finalized during the company 2019s year ending february 28 , 2006 ( see note19 ) . accordingly , the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement . estimated fair values at december 22 , 2004 , are as follows : {in thousands} . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 494788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>452902</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other assets</td><td>178823</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>186000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>590459</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1902972</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>309051</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>552060</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities acquired</td><td>861111</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 1041861</td></tr></table> the trademarks are not subject to amortization . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in connection with the robert mondavi acquisition and robert mondavi 2019s previously disclosed intention to sell certain of its winery properties and related assets , and other vineyard prop- erties , the company has classified certain assets as held for sale as of february 28 , 2005 . the company expects to sell these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 , for net pro- ceeds of approximately $ 150 million to $ 175 million . no gain or loss is expected to be recognized upon the sale of these assets . hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock . as a result of the acquisition of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 . the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in winer- ies and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s market- ing and sales operations in the united kingdom . total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million . additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million . the acquisition date for accounting purposes is march 27 , 2003 . the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consider- ation . this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 . the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 mil- lion ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million .
Question: between the two acquisitions, was the purchase price for hardy greater than for mondavi?
Answer: yes
Question: what portion of the net asset acquired is from goodwill?
| 0.56673 |
CONVFINQA9231 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .
Question: what was the value of american airlines in 2015?
| 175.0 |
CONVFINQA9232 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .
Question: what was the value of american airlines in 2015?
Answer: 175.0
Question: what was the value in 2014?
| 219.0 |
CONVFINQA9233 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .
Question: what was the value of american airlines in 2015?
Answer: 175.0
Question: what was the value in 2014?
Answer: 219.0
Question: what was the difference from 2014 to 2015?
| -44.0 |
CONVFINQA9234 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .
Question: what was the value of american airlines in 2015?
Answer: 175.0
Question: what was the value in 2014?
Answer: 219.0
Question: what was the difference from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -44.0
Question: what is the percent decrease?
| -0.20091 |
CONVFINQA9235 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. .
Question: what is the net sales in 2010?
| 8246.0 |
CONVFINQA9236 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. .
Question: what is the net sales in 2010?
Answer: 8246.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2010?
| 972.0 |
CONVFINQA9237 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. .
Question: what is the net sales in 2010?
Answer: 8246.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2010?
Answer: 972.0
Question: what is the the difference among these two?
| 7274.0 |
CONVFINQA9238 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. .
Question: what is the net sales in 2010?
Answer: 8246.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2010?
Answer: 972.0
Question: what is the the difference among these two?
Answer: 7274.0
Question: what is the operating profit margin in 2010?
| 0.88212 |
CONVFINQA9239 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
| 32136.0 |
CONVFINQA9240 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: and what was is it 2010?
| 19900.0 |
CONVFINQA9241 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: and what was is it 2010?
Answer: 19900.0
Question: what was, the increase over the year?
| 12236.0 |
CONVFINQA9242 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: and what was is it 2010?
Answer: 19900.0
Question: what was, the increase over the year?
Answer: 12236.0
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2010 total?
| 0.61487 |
CONVFINQA9243 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at .
Question: what is the balance of reported liabilities?
| 2008.2 |
CONVFINQA9244 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at .
Question: what is the balance of reported liabilities?
Answer: 2008.2
Question: what about the balance of assets?
| 2175.1 |
CONVFINQA9245 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at .
Question: what is the balance of reported liabilities?
Answer: 2008.2
Question: what about the balance of assets?
Answer: 2175.1
Question: what is the debt-to-assets ratio?
| 0.92327 |
CONVFINQA9246 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at .
Question: what is the balance of reported liabilities?
Answer: 2008.2
Question: what about the balance of assets?
Answer: 2175.1
Question: what is the debt-to-assets ratio?
Answer: 0.92327
Question: what is the total expected loss notes outstanding in 2008?
| 136.0 |
CONVFINQA9247 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at .
Question: what is the balance of reported liabilities?
Answer: 2008.2
Question: what about the balance of assets?
Answer: 2175.1
Question: what is the debt-to-assets ratio?
Answer: 0.92327
Question: what is the total expected loss notes outstanding in 2008?
Answer: 136.0
Question: what about in 2007?
| 130.0 |
CONVFINQA9248 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at .
Question: what is the balance of reported liabilities?
Answer: 2008.2
Question: what about the balance of assets?
Answer: 2175.1
Question: what is the debt-to-assets ratio?
Answer: 0.92327
Question: what is the total expected loss notes outstanding in 2008?
Answer: 136.0
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 130.0
Question: what is the ratio of expected loss notes outstanding in 2008 to 2007?
| 1.04615 |
CONVFINQA9249 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what is the days of sales outstanding in 2015?
| 48.0 |
CONVFINQA9250 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what is the days of sales outstanding in 2015?
Answer: 48.0
Question: what about in 2014?
| 42.0 |
CONVFINQA9251 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what is the days of sales outstanding in 2015?
Answer: 48.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 42.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 6.0 |
CONVFINQA9252 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what is the days of sales outstanding in 2015?
Answer: 48.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 42.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 6.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.14286 |
CONVFINQA9253 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2016 note 16 2014share-based compensation 2007 equity incentive compensation plan the company 2019s 2007 equity incentive compensation plan , or the eip , authorizes the compensation committee of the board of directors to grant non-qualified stock options ( 201coptions 201d ) , restricted stock awards ( 201crsas 201d ) , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and performance-based shares to its employees and non-employee directors , for up to 236 million shares of class a common stock . shares available for award may be either authorized and unissued or previously issued shares subsequently acquired by the company . the eip will continue to be in effect until all of the common stock available under the eip is delivered and all restrictions on those shares have lapsed , unless the eip is terminated earlier by the company 2019s board of directors . in january 2016 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an amendment of the eip effective february 3 , 2016 , such that awards may be granted under the plan until january 31 , 2022 . share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost related to the eip of $ 211 million , $ 184 million and $ 172 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the related tax benefits were $ 62 million , $ 54 million and $ 51 million for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and all per share amounts and number of shares outstanding presented below reflect the four-for-one stock split that was effected in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 . see note 14 2014stockholders 2019 equity . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and primarily vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 1 )</td><td>4.35</td><td>4.55</td><td>4.80</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free rate of return ( 2 )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility ( 3 )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>22.0% ( 22.0 % )</td><td>25.2% ( 25.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield ( 4 )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 15.01</td><td>$ 12.04</td><td>$ 11.03</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) this assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2016 was approximately 77% ( 77 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , 67% ( 67 % ) and 33% ( 33 % ) in fiscal 2015 , respectively , and 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) in fiscal 2014 , respectively. .
Question: in 2016, what was the share based compensation?
| 211.0 |
CONVFINQA9254 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2016 note 16 2014share-based compensation 2007 equity incentive compensation plan the company 2019s 2007 equity incentive compensation plan , or the eip , authorizes the compensation committee of the board of directors to grant non-qualified stock options ( 201coptions 201d ) , restricted stock awards ( 201crsas 201d ) , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and performance-based shares to its employees and non-employee directors , for up to 236 million shares of class a common stock . shares available for award may be either authorized and unissued or previously issued shares subsequently acquired by the company . the eip will continue to be in effect until all of the common stock available under the eip is delivered and all restrictions on those shares have lapsed , unless the eip is terminated earlier by the company 2019s board of directors . in january 2016 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an amendment of the eip effective february 3 , 2016 , such that awards may be granted under the plan until january 31 , 2022 . share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost related to the eip of $ 211 million , $ 184 million and $ 172 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the related tax benefits were $ 62 million , $ 54 million and $ 51 million for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and all per share amounts and number of shares outstanding presented below reflect the four-for-one stock split that was effected in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 . see note 14 2014stockholders 2019 equity . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and primarily vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 1 )</td><td>4.35</td><td>4.55</td><td>4.80</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free rate of return ( 2 )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility ( 3 )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>22.0% ( 22.0 % )</td><td>25.2% ( 25.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield ( 4 )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 15.01</td><td>$ 12.04</td><td>$ 11.03</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) this assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2016 was approximately 77% ( 77 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , 67% ( 67 % ) and 33% ( 33 % ) in fiscal 2015 , respectively , and 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) in fiscal 2014 , respectively. .
Question: in 2016, what was the share based compensation?
Answer: 211.0
Question: and what was the total of related tax benefits?
| 62.0 |
CONVFINQA9255 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2016 note 16 2014share-based compensation 2007 equity incentive compensation plan the company 2019s 2007 equity incentive compensation plan , or the eip , authorizes the compensation committee of the board of directors to grant non-qualified stock options ( 201coptions 201d ) , restricted stock awards ( 201crsas 201d ) , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and performance-based shares to its employees and non-employee directors , for up to 236 million shares of class a common stock . shares available for award may be either authorized and unissued or previously issued shares subsequently acquired by the company . the eip will continue to be in effect until all of the common stock available under the eip is delivered and all restrictions on those shares have lapsed , unless the eip is terminated earlier by the company 2019s board of directors . in january 2016 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an amendment of the eip effective february 3 , 2016 , such that awards may be granted under the plan until january 31 , 2022 . share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost related to the eip of $ 211 million , $ 184 million and $ 172 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the related tax benefits were $ 62 million , $ 54 million and $ 51 million for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and all per share amounts and number of shares outstanding presented below reflect the four-for-one stock split that was effected in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 . see note 14 2014stockholders 2019 equity . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and primarily vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 1 )</td><td>4.35</td><td>4.55</td><td>4.80</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free rate of return ( 2 )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility ( 3 )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>22.0% ( 22.0 % )</td><td>25.2% ( 25.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield ( 4 )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 15.01</td><td>$ 12.04</td><td>$ 11.03</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) this assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2016 was approximately 77% ( 77 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , 67% ( 67 % ) and 33% ( 33 % ) in fiscal 2015 , respectively , and 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) in fiscal 2014 , respectively. .
Question: in 2016, what was the share based compensation?
Answer: 211.0
Question: and what was the total of related tax benefits?
Answer: 62.0
Question: how much, then, did that compensation represent in relation to this total?
| 3.40323 |
CONVFINQA9256 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2016 note 16 2014share-based compensation 2007 equity incentive compensation plan the company 2019s 2007 equity incentive compensation plan , or the eip , authorizes the compensation committee of the board of directors to grant non-qualified stock options ( 201coptions 201d ) , restricted stock awards ( 201crsas 201d ) , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and performance-based shares to its employees and non-employee directors , for up to 236 million shares of class a common stock . shares available for award may be either authorized and unissued or previously issued shares subsequently acquired by the company . the eip will continue to be in effect until all of the common stock available under the eip is delivered and all restrictions on those shares have lapsed , unless the eip is terminated earlier by the company 2019s board of directors . in january 2016 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an amendment of the eip effective february 3 , 2016 , such that awards may be granted under the plan until january 31 , 2022 . share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost related to the eip of $ 211 million , $ 184 million and $ 172 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the related tax benefits were $ 62 million , $ 54 million and $ 51 million for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and all per share amounts and number of shares outstanding presented below reflect the four-for-one stock split that was effected in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 . see note 14 2014stockholders 2019 equity . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and primarily vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 1 )</td><td>4.35</td><td>4.55</td><td>4.80</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free rate of return ( 2 )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility ( 3 )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>22.0% ( 22.0 % )</td><td>25.2% ( 25.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield ( 4 )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 15.01</td><td>$ 12.04</td><td>$ 11.03</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) this assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2016 was approximately 77% ( 77 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , 67% ( 67 % ) and 33% ( 33 % ) in fiscal 2015 , respectively , and 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) in fiscal 2014 , respectively. .
Question: in 2016, what was the share based compensation?
Answer: 211.0
Question: and what was the total of related tax benefits?
Answer: 62.0
Question: how much, then, did that compensation represent in relation to this total?
Answer: 3.40323
Question: and from 2015 to that year, what was the change in the fair value per option granted?
| 2.97 |
CONVFINQA9257 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
has decreased during the period from 2002 to 2004 , principally due to the increase in earned premium and due to cost containment measures undertaken by management . in business insurance and personal lines , the expense ratio is expected to decrease further in 2005 , largely as a result of expected increases in earned premium . in specialty commercial , the expense ratio is expected to increase slightly in 2005 due to changes in the business mix , most notably the company 2019s decision in the fourth quarter of 2004 to exit the multi-peril crop insurance program which will eliminate significant expense reimbursements from the specialty commercial segment . policyholder dividend ratio : the policyholder dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholder dividends to earned premium . combined ratio : the combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio , the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio . this ratio is a relative measurement that describes the related cost of losses and expense for every $ 100 of earned premiums . a combined ratio below 100.0 demonstrates underwriting profit ; a combined ratio above 100.0 demonstrates underwriting losses . the combined ratio has decreased from 2003 to 2004 primarily because of improvement in the expense ratio . the combined ratio in 2005 could be significantly higher or lower than the 2004 combined ratio depending on the level of catastrophe losses , but will also be impacted by changes in pricing and an expected moderation in favorable loss cost trends . catastrophe ratio : the catastrophe ratio ( a component of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio ) represents the ratio of catastrophe losses ( net of reinsurance ) to earned premiums . a catastrophe is an event that causes $ 25 or more in industry insured property losses and affects a significant number of property and casualty policyholders and insurers . by their nature , catastrophe losses vary dramatically from year to year . based on the mix and geographic dispersion of premium written and estimates derived from various catastrophe loss models , the company 2019s expected catastrophe ratio over the long-term is 3.0 points . before considering the reduction in ongoing operation 2019s catastrophe reserves related to september 11 of $ 298 in 2004 , the catastrophe ratio in 2004 was 5.3 points . see 201crisk management strategy 201d below for a discussion of the company 2019s property catastrophe risk management program that serves to mitigate the company 2019s net exposure to catastrophe losses . combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development : the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the current accident year , excluding the impact of catastrophes . the company believes this ratio is an important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year reserve development . before considering catastrophes , the combined ratio related to current accident year business has improved from 2002 to 2004 principally due to earned pricing increases and favorable claim frequency . other operations underwriting results : the other operations segment is responsible for managing operations of the hartford that have discontinued writing new or renewal business as well as managing the claims related to asbestos and environmental exposures . as such , neither earned premiums nor underwriting ratios are meaningful financial measures . instead , management believes that underwriting result is a more meaningful measure . the net underwriting loss for 2002 through 2004 is primarily due to prior accident year loss development , including $ 2.6 billion of net asbestos reserve strengthening in 2003 . reserve estimates within other operations , including estimates for asbestos and environmental claims , are inherently uncertain . refer to the other operations segment md&a for further discussion of other operation's underwriting results . total property & casualty investment earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment yield after-tax</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized capital gains ( losses ) after-tax</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 165</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td></tr></table> the investment return , or yield , on property & casualty 2019s invested assets is an important element of the company 2019s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before loss and loss adjustment expenses are paid . for longer tail lines , such as workers 2019 compensation and general liability , claims are paid over several years and , therefore , the premiums received for these lines of business can generate significant investment income . him determines the appropriate allocation of investments by asset class and measures the investment yield performance for each asset class against market indices or other benchmarks . due to the emphasis on preservation of capital and the need to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy claim obligations , the vast majority of property and casualty 2019s invested assets have been held in fixed maturities , including , among other asset classes , corporate bonds , municipal bonds , government debt , short-term debt , mortgage- .
Question: what was the net realized gain for the year of 2004?
| 87.0 |
CONVFINQA9258 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
has decreased during the period from 2002 to 2004 , principally due to the increase in earned premium and due to cost containment measures undertaken by management . in business insurance and personal lines , the expense ratio is expected to decrease further in 2005 , largely as a result of expected increases in earned premium . in specialty commercial , the expense ratio is expected to increase slightly in 2005 due to changes in the business mix , most notably the company 2019s decision in the fourth quarter of 2004 to exit the multi-peril crop insurance program which will eliminate significant expense reimbursements from the specialty commercial segment . policyholder dividend ratio : the policyholder dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholder dividends to earned premium . combined ratio : the combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio , the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio . this ratio is a relative measurement that describes the related cost of losses and expense for every $ 100 of earned premiums . a combined ratio below 100.0 demonstrates underwriting profit ; a combined ratio above 100.0 demonstrates underwriting losses . the combined ratio has decreased from 2003 to 2004 primarily because of improvement in the expense ratio . the combined ratio in 2005 could be significantly higher or lower than the 2004 combined ratio depending on the level of catastrophe losses , but will also be impacted by changes in pricing and an expected moderation in favorable loss cost trends . catastrophe ratio : the catastrophe ratio ( a component of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio ) represents the ratio of catastrophe losses ( net of reinsurance ) to earned premiums . a catastrophe is an event that causes $ 25 or more in industry insured property losses and affects a significant number of property and casualty policyholders and insurers . by their nature , catastrophe losses vary dramatically from year to year . based on the mix and geographic dispersion of premium written and estimates derived from various catastrophe loss models , the company 2019s expected catastrophe ratio over the long-term is 3.0 points . before considering the reduction in ongoing operation 2019s catastrophe reserves related to september 11 of $ 298 in 2004 , the catastrophe ratio in 2004 was 5.3 points . see 201crisk management strategy 201d below for a discussion of the company 2019s property catastrophe risk management program that serves to mitigate the company 2019s net exposure to catastrophe losses . combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development : the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the current accident year , excluding the impact of catastrophes . the company believes this ratio is an important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year reserve development . before considering catastrophes , the combined ratio related to current accident year business has improved from 2002 to 2004 principally due to earned pricing increases and favorable claim frequency . other operations underwriting results : the other operations segment is responsible for managing operations of the hartford that have discontinued writing new or renewal business as well as managing the claims related to asbestos and environmental exposures . as such , neither earned premiums nor underwriting ratios are meaningful financial measures . instead , management believes that underwriting result is a more meaningful measure . the net underwriting loss for 2002 through 2004 is primarily due to prior accident year loss development , including $ 2.6 billion of net asbestos reserve strengthening in 2003 . reserve estimates within other operations , including estimates for asbestos and environmental claims , are inherently uncertain . refer to the other operations segment md&a for further discussion of other operation's underwriting results . total property & casualty investment earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment yield after-tax</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized capital gains ( losses ) after-tax</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 165</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td></tr></table> the investment return , or yield , on property & casualty 2019s invested assets is an important element of the company 2019s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before loss and loss adjustment expenses are paid . for longer tail lines , such as workers 2019 compensation and general liability , claims are paid over several years and , therefore , the premiums received for these lines of business can generate significant investment income . him determines the appropriate allocation of investments by asset class and measures the investment yield performance for each asset class against market indices or other benchmarks . due to the emphasis on preservation of capital and the need to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy claim obligations , the vast majority of property and casualty 2019s invested assets have been held in fixed maturities , including , among other asset classes , corporate bonds , municipal bonds , government debt , short-term debt , mortgage- .
Question: what was the net realized gain for the year of 2004?
Answer: 87.0
Question: and what was it for 2003?
| 165.0 |
CONVFINQA9259 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
has decreased during the period from 2002 to 2004 , principally due to the increase in earned premium and due to cost containment measures undertaken by management . in business insurance and personal lines , the expense ratio is expected to decrease further in 2005 , largely as a result of expected increases in earned premium . in specialty commercial , the expense ratio is expected to increase slightly in 2005 due to changes in the business mix , most notably the company 2019s decision in the fourth quarter of 2004 to exit the multi-peril crop insurance program which will eliminate significant expense reimbursements from the specialty commercial segment . policyholder dividend ratio : the policyholder dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholder dividends to earned premium . combined ratio : the combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio , the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio . this ratio is a relative measurement that describes the related cost of losses and expense for every $ 100 of earned premiums . a combined ratio below 100.0 demonstrates underwriting profit ; a combined ratio above 100.0 demonstrates underwriting losses . the combined ratio has decreased from 2003 to 2004 primarily because of improvement in the expense ratio . the combined ratio in 2005 could be significantly higher or lower than the 2004 combined ratio depending on the level of catastrophe losses , but will also be impacted by changes in pricing and an expected moderation in favorable loss cost trends . catastrophe ratio : the catastrophe ratio ( a component of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio ) represents the ratio of catastrophe losses ( net of reinsurance ) to earned premiums . a catastrophe is an event that causes $ 25 or more in industry insured property losses and affects a significant number of property and casualty policyholders and insurers . by their nature , catastrophe losses vary dramatically from year to year . based on the mix and geographic dispersion of premium written and estimates derived from various catastrophe loss models , the company 2019s expected catastrophe ratio over the long-term is 3.0 points . before considering the reduction in ongoing operation 2019s catastrophe reserves related to september 11 of $ 298 in 2004 , the catastrophe ratio in 2004 was 5.3 points . see 201crisk management strategy 201d below for a discussion of the company 2019s property catastrophe risk management program that serves to mitigate the company 2019s net exposure to catastrophe losses . combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development : the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the current accident year , excluding the impact of catastrophes . the company believes this ratio is an important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year reserve development . before considering catastrophes , the combined ratio related to current accident year business has improved from 2002 to 2004 principally due to earned pricing increases and favorable claim frequency . other operations underwriting results : the other operations segment is responsible for managing operations of the hartford that have discontinued writing new or renewal business as well as managing the claims related to asbestos and environmental exposures . as such , neither earned premiums nor underwriting ratios are meaningful financial measures . instead , management believes that underwriting result is a more meaningful measure . the net underwriting loss for 2002 through 2004 is primarily due to prior accident year loss development , including $ 2.6 billion of net asbestos reserve strengthening in 2003 . reserve estimates within other operations , including estimates for asbestos and environmental claims , are inherently uncertain . refer to the other operations segment md&a for further discussion of other operation's underwriting results . total property & casualty investment earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment yield after-tax</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized capital gains ( losses ) after-tax</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 165</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td></tr></table> the investment return , or yield , on property & casualty 2019s invested assets is an important element of the company 2019s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before loss and loss adjustment expenses are paid . for longer tail lines , such as workers 2019 compensation and general liability , claims are paid over several years and , therefore , the premiums received for these lines of business can generate significant investment income . him determines the appropriate allocation of investments by asset class and measures the investment yield performance for each asset class against market indices or other benchmarks . due to the emphasis on preservation of capital and the need to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy claim obligations , the vast majority of property and casualty 2019s invested assets have been held in fixed maturities , including , among other asset classes , corporate bonds , municipal bonds , government debt , short-term debt , mortgage- .
Question: what was the net realized gain for the year of 2004?
Answer: 87.0
Question: and what was it for 2003?
Answer: 165.0
Question: what was, then, the total net realized gain for both years?
| 252.0 |
CONVFINQA9260 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
has decreased during the period from 2002 to 2004 , principally due to the increase in earned premium and due to cost containment measures undertaken by management . in business insurance and personal lines , the expense ratio is expected to decrease further in 2005 , largely as a result of expected increases in earned premium . in specialty commercial , the expense ratio is expected to increase slightly in 2005 due to changes in the business mix , most notably the company 2019s decision in the fourth quarter of 2004 to exit the multi-peril crop insurance program which will eliminate significant expense reimbursements from the specialty commercial segment . policyholder dividend ratio : the policyholder dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholder dividends to earned premium . combined ratio : the combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio , the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio . this ratio is a relative measurement that describes the related cost of losses and expense for every $ 100 of earned premiums . a combined ratio below 100.0 demonstrates underwriting profit ; a combined ratio above 100.0 demonstrates underwriting losses . the combined ratio has decreased from 2003 to 2004 primarily because of improvement in the expense ratio . the combined ratio in 2005 could be significantly higher or lower than the 2004 combined ratio depending on the level of catastrophe losses , but will also be impacted by changes in pricing and an expected moderation in favorable loss cost trends . catastrophe ratio : the catastrophe ratio ( a component of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio ) represents the ratio of catastrophe losses ( net of reinsurance ) to earned premiums . a catastrophe is an event that causes $ 25 or more in industry insured property losses and affects a significant number of property and casualty policyholders and insurers . by their nature , catastrophe losses vary dramatically from year to year . based on the mix and geographic dispersion of premium written and estimates derived from various catastrophe loss models , the company 2019s expected catastrophe ratio over the long-term is 3.0 points . before considering the reduction in ongoing operation 2019s catastrophe reserves related to september 11 of $ 298 in 2004 , the catastrophe ratio in 2004 was 5.3 points . see 201crisk management strategy 201d below for a discussion of the company 2019s property catastrophe risk management program that serves to mitigate the company 2019s net exposure to catastrophe losses . combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development : the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the current accident year , excluding the impact of catastrophes . the company believes this ratio is an important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year reserve development . before considering catastrophes , the combined ratio related to current accident year business has improved from 2002 to 2004 principally due to earned pricing increases and favorable claim frequency . other operations underwriting results : the other operations segment is responsible for managing operations of the hartford that have discontinued writing new or renewal business as well as managing the claims related to asbestos and environmental exposures . as such , neither earned premiums nor underwriting ratios are meaningful financial measures . instead , management believes that underwriting result is a more meaningful measure . the net underwriting loss for 2002 through 2004 is primarily due to prior accident year loss development , including $ 2.6 billion of net asbestos reserve strengthening in 2003 . reserve estimates within other operations , including estimates for asbestos and environmental claims , are inherently uncertain . refer to the other operations segment md&a for further discussion of other operation's underwriting results . total property & casualty investment earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment yield after-tax</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized capital gains ( losses ) after-tax</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 165</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td></tr></table> the investment return , or yield , on property & casualty 2019s invested assets is an important element of the company 2019s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before loss and loss adjustment expenses are paid . for longer tail lines , such as workers 2019 compensation and general liability , claims are paid over several years and , therefore , the premiums received for these lines of business can generate significant investment income . him determines the appropriate allocation of investments by asset class and measures the investment yield performance for each asset class against market indices or other benchmarks . due to the emphasis on preservation of capital and the need to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy claim obligations , the vast majority of property and casualty 2019s invested assets have been held in fixed maturities , including , among other asset classes , corporate bonds , municipal bonds , government debt , short-term debt , mortgage- .
Question: what was the net realized gain for the year of 2004?
Answer: 87.0
Question: and what was it for 2003?
Answer: 165.0
Question: what was, then, the total net realized gain for both years?
Answer: 252.0
Question: and what was the net realized gain in 2002?
| 44.0 |
CONVFINQA9261 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
has decreased during the period from 2002 to 2004 , principally due to the increase in earned premium and due to cost containment measures undertaken by management . in business insurance and personal lines , the expense ratio is expected to decrease further in 2005 , largely as a result of expected increases in earned premium . in specialty commercial , the expense ratio is expected to increase slightly in 2005 due to changes in the business mix , most notably the company 2019s decision in the fourth quarter of 2004 to exit the multi-peril crop insurance program which will eliminate significant expense reimbursements from the specialty commercial segment . policyholder dividend ratio : the policyholder dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholder dividends to earned premium . combined ratio : the combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio , the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio . this ratio is a relative measurement that describes the related cost of losses and expense for every $ 100 of earned premiums . a combined ratio below 100.0 demonstrates underwriting profit ; a combined ratio above 100.0 demonstrates underwriting losses . the combined ratio has decreased from 2003 to 2004 primarily because of improvement in the expense ratio . the combined ratio in 2005 could be significantly higher or lower than the 2004 combined ratio depending on the level of catastrophe losses , but will also be impacted by changes in pricing and an expected moderation in favorable loss cost trends . catastrophe ratio : the catastrophe ratio ( a component of the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio ) represents the ratio of catastrophe losses ( net of reinsurance ) to earned premiums . a catastrophe is an event that causes $ 25 or more in industry insured property losses and affects a significant number of property and casualty policyholders and insurers . by their nature , catastrophe losses vary dramatically from year to year . based on the mix and geographic dispersion of premium written and estimates derived from various catastrophe loss models , the company 2019s expected catastrophe ratio over the long-term is 3.0 points . before considering the reduction in ongoing operation 2019s catastrophe reserves related to september 11 of $ 298 in 2004 , the catastrophe ratio in 2004 was 5.3 points . see 201crisk management strategy 201d below for a discussion of the company 2019s property catastrophe risk management program that serves to mitigate the company 2019s net exposure to catastrophe losses . combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development : the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the current accident year , excluding the impact of catastrophes . the company believes this ratio is an important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year reserve development . before considering catastrophes , the combined ratio related to current accident year business has improved from 2002 to 2004 principally due to earned pricing increases and favorable claim frequency . other operations underwriting results : the other operations segment is responsible for managing operations of the hartford that have discontinued writing new or renewal business as well as managing the claims related to asbestos and environmental exposures . as such , neither earned premiums nor underwriting ratios are meaningful financial measures . instead , management believes that underwriting result is a more meaningful measure . the net underwriting loss for 2002 through 2004 is primarily due to prior accident year loss development , including $ 2.6 billion of net asbestos reserve strengthening in 2003 . reserve estimates within other operations , including estimates for asbestos and environmental claims , are inherently uncertain . refer to the other operations segment md&a for further discussion of other operation's underwriting results . total property & casualty investment earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment yield after-tax</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized capital gains ( losses ) after-tax</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 165</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td></tr></table> the investment return , or yield , on property & casualty 2019s invested assets is an important element of the company 2019s earnings since insurance products are priced with the assumption that premiums received can be invested for a period of time before loss and loss adjustment expenses are paid . for longer tail lines , such as workers 2019 compensation and general liability , claims are paid over several years and , therefore , the premiums received for these lines of business can generate significant investment income . him determines the appropriate allocation of investments by asset class and measures the investment yield performance for each asset class against market indices or other benchmarks . due to the emphasis on preservation of capital and the need to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy claim obligations , the vast majority of property and casualty 2019s invested assets have been held in fixed maturities , including , among other asset classes , corporate bonds , municipal bonds , government debt , short-term debt , mortgage- .
Question: what was the net realized gain for the year of 2004?
Answer: 87.0
Question: and what was it for 2003?
Answer: 165.0
Question: what was, then, the total net realized gain for both years?
Answer: 252.0
Question: and what was the net realized gain in 2002?
Answer: 44.0
Question: including 2002, what would then be the total net realized gain for the three years?
| 208.0 |
CONVFINQA9262 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: in the year of 2014, what percentage of the total sales was due to intersegment ones?
| 0.02455 |
CONVFINQA9263 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: in the year of 2014, what percentage of the total sales was due to intersegment ones?
Answer: 0.02455
Question: and how much did the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in that year represent in relation to the one in 2015?
| 1.06517 |
CONVFINQA9264 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: in the year of 2014, what percentage of the total sales was due to intersegment ones?
Answer: 0.02455
Question: and how much did the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in that year represent in relation to the one in 2015?
Answer: 1.06517
Question: what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2015 average realized price?
| 0.06517 |
CONVFINQA9265 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchased scrap metal from third-parties ) that were either divested or permanently closed in december 2014 ( see global rolled products below ) . intersegment sales for this segment improved 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally due to an increase in average realized price , driven by higher regional premiums , and higher demand from the midstream and downstream businesses . atoi for the primary metals segment decreased $ 439 in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily caused by both the previously mentioned lower average realized aluminum price and lower energy sales , higher energy costs ( mostly in spain as the 2014 interruptibility rights were more favorable than the 2015 structure ) , and an unfavorable impact related to the curtailment of the s e3o lu eds smelter . these negative impacts were somewhat offset by net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against most major currencies , net productivity improvements , the absence of a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and a lower equity loss related to the joint venture in saudi arabia , including the absence of restart costs for one of the potlines that was previously shut down due to a period of instability . atoi for this segment climbed $ 614 in 2014 compared with 2013 , principally related to a higher average realized aluminum price ; the previously mentioned energy sales in brazil ; net productivity improvements ; net favorable foreign currency movements due to a stronger u.s . dollar against all major currencies ; lower costs for carbon and alumina ; and the absence of costs related to a planned maintenance outage in 2013 at a power plant in australia . these positive impacts were slightly offset by an unfavorable impact associated with the 2013 and 2014 capacity reductions described above , including a write-off of inventory related to the permanent closure of the portovesme , point henry , and massena east smelters ( $ 44 ) , and higher energy costs ( particularly in spain ) , labor , and maintenance . in 2016 , aluminum production will be approximately 450 kmt lower and third-party sales will reflect the absence of approximately $ 400 both as a result of the 2015 curtailment and closure actions . also , energy sales in brazil will be negatively impacted by a decline in energy prices , while net productivity improvements are anticipated . global rolled products . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party aluminum shipments ( kmt )</td><td>1775</td><td>1964</td><td>1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum*</td><td>$ 3514</td><td>$ 3743</td><td>$ 3730</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 6238</td><td>$ 7351</td><td>$ 7106</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intersegment sales</td><td>125</td><td>185</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total sales</td><td>$ 6363</td><td>$ 7536</td><td>$ 7284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 244</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 292</td></tr></table> * generally , average realized price per metric ton of aluminum includes two elements : a ) the price of metal ( the underlying base metal component plus a regional premium 2013 see the footnote to the table in primary metals above for a description of these two components ) , and b ) the conversion price , which represents the incremental price over the metal price component that is associated with converting primary aluminum into sheet and plate . in this circumstance , the metal price component is a pass- through to this segment 2019s customers with limited exception ( e.g. , fixed-priced contracts , certain regional premiums ) . this segment represents alcoa 2019s midstream operations and produces aluminum sheet and plate for a variety of end markets . approximately one-half of the third-party shipments in this segment consist of sheet sold directly to customers in the packaging end market for the production of aluminum cans ( beverage , food , and pet food ) . seasonal increases in can sheet sales are generally experienced in the second and third quarters of the year . this segment also includes sheet and plate sold directly to customers and through distributors related to the aerospace , automotive , commercial transportation , building and construction , and industrial products ( mainly used in the production of machinery and equipment and consumer durables ) end markets . a small portion of this segment also produces aseptic foil for the packaging end market . while the customer base for flat-rolled products is large , a significant amount of sales of sheet and plate is to a relatively small number of customers . in this circumstance , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , the euro , the russian ruble , the brazilian real , and the british pound. .
Question: in the year of 2014, what percentage of the total sales was due to intersegment ones?
Answer: 0.02455
Question: and how much did the alcoa 2019s average realized price per metric ton of aluminum in that year represent in relation to the one in 2015?
Answer: 1.06517
Question: what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2015 average realized price?
Answer: 0.06517
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| 6.51679 |
CONVFINQA9266 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2016</td><td>309</td><td>$ 55.94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>186</td><td>63.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-204 ( 204 )</td><td>46.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>70.50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2017</td><td>281</td><td>$ 67.33</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .
Question: what was the total of granted shares, in thousands?
| 186.0 |
CONVFINQA9267 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2016</td><td>309</td><td>$ 55.94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>186</td><td>63.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-204 ( 204 )</td><td>46.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>70.50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2017</td><td>281</td><td>$ 67.33</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .
Question: what was the total of granted shares, in thousands?
Answer: 186.0
Question: and how much is that, not in thousands?
| 186000.0 |
CONVFINQA9268 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2016</td><td>309</td><td>$ 55.94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>186</td><td>63.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-204 ( 204 )</td><td>46.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>70.50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2017</td><td>281</td><td>$ 67.33</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .
Question: what was the total of granted shares, in thousands?
Answer: 186.0
Question: and how much is that, not in thousands?
Answer: 186000.0
Question: what was the weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )?
| 63.1 |
CONVFINQA9269 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2016</td><td>309</td><td>$ 55.94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>186</td><td>63.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-204 ( 204 )</td><td>46.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>70.50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2017</td><td>281</td><td>$ 67.33</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .
Question: what was the total of granted shares, in thousands?
Answer: 186.0
Question: and how much is that, not in thousands?
Answer: 186000.0
Question: what was the weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )?
Answer: 63.1
Question: what was, then, the total value of those granted shares?
| 11736600.0 |
CONVFINQA9270 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .
Question: what was the difference in lcr ratio between 12/31/15 and 12/31/16?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA9271 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td><td>sept . 30 2016</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 403.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td><td>$ 389.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>332.5</td><td>335.3</td><td>344.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>113% ( 113 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 71.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 44.8</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased both year-over-year and sequentially . the increase year-over-year was driven by both an increase in hqla and a reduction in net outflows . sequentially , the increase was driven by a slight reduction in net outflows , as hqla remained largely unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in the second quarter of 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . standardized weightings would be required to be applied to the various asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2016 , it will need to evaluate any final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2017 . the proposed rules would require full implementation of the u.s . nsfr beginning january 1 , 2018. .
Question: what was the difference in lcr ratio between 12/31/15 and 12/31/16?
Answer: 8.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase of this value?
| 0.0708 |
CONVFINQA9272 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in addition to the contractual obligations given above , entergy texas expects to contribute approximately $ 17 million to its qualified pension plans and approximately $ 3.2 million to other postretirement health care and life insurance plans in 2017 , although the 2017 required pension contributions will be known with more certainty when the january 1 , 2017 valuations are completed , which is expected by april 1 , 2017 . see 201ccritical accounting estimates - qualified pension and other postretirement benefits 201d below for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding . also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy texas has $ 15.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine capital spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate for entergy texas includes specific investments such as the montgomery county power station discussed below ; transmission projects to enhance reliability , reduce congestion , and enable economic growth ; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers , including initial investment to support advanced metering ; system improvements ; and other investments . estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements , environmental compliance , business opportunities , market volatility , economic trends , business restructuring , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt in note 5 to the financial statements . as discussed above in 201ccapital structure , 201d entergy texas routinely evaluates its ability to pay dividends to entergy corporation from its earnings . sources of capital entergy texas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy texas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy texas require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indenture and other agreements . entergy texas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy texas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 681</td><td>( $ 22068 )</td><td>$ 306</td><td>$ 6287</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy texas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy texas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and $ 4.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what was the drawn amount from the credit facility that was set to expire in august 2021?
| 4.7 |
CONVFINQA9273 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in addition to the contractual obligations given above , entergy texas expects to contribute approximately $ 17 million to its qualified pension plans and approximately $ 3.2 million to other postretirement health care and life insurance plans in 2017 , although the 2017 required pension contributions will be known with more certainty when the january 1 , 2017 valuations are completed , which is expected by april 1 , 2017 . see 201ccritical accounting estimates - qualified pension and other postretirement benefits 201d below for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding . also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy texas has $ 15.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine capital spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate for entergy texas includes specific investments such as the montgomery county power station discussed below ; transmission projects to enhance reliability , reduce congestion , and enable economic growth ; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers , including initial investment to support advanced metering ; system improvements ; and other investments . estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements , environmental compliance , business opportunities , market volatility , economic trends , business restructuring , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt in note 5 to the financial statements . as discussed above in 201ccapital structure , 201d entergy texas routinely evaluates its ability to pay dividends to entergy corporation from its earnings . sources of capital entergy texas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy texas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy texas require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indenture and other agreements . entergy texas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy texas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 681</td><td>( $ 22068 )</td><td>$ 306</td><td>$ 6287</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy texas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy texas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and $ 4.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what was the drawn amount from the credit facility that was set to expire in august 2021?
Answer: 4.7
Question: and what was that credit facility?
| 150.0 |
CONVFINQA9274 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in addition to the contractual obligations given above , entergy texas expects to contribute approximately $ 17 million to its qualified pension plans and approximately $ 3.2 million to other postretirement health care and life insurance plans in 2017 , although the 2017 required pension contributions will be known with more certainty when the january 1 , 2017 valuations are completed , which is expected by april 1 , 2017 . see 201ccritical accounting estimates - qualified pension and other postretirement benefits 201d below for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding . also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy texas has $ 15.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine capital spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate for entergy texas includes specific investments such as the montgomery county power station discussed below ; transmission projects to enhance reliability , reduce congestion , and enable economic growth ; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers , including initial investment to support advanced metering ; system improvements ; and other investments . estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements , environmental compliance , business opportunities , market volatility , economic trends , business restructuring , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt in note 5 to the financial statements . as discussed above in 201ccapital structure , 201d entergy texas routinely evaluates its ability to pay dividends to entergy corporation from its earnings . sources of capital entergy texas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy texas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy texas require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indenture and other agreements . entergy texas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy texas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 681</td><td>( $ 22068 )</td><td>$ 306</td><td>$ 6287</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy texas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy texas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and $ 4.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what was the drawn amount from the credit facility that was set to expire in august 2021?
Answer: 4.7
Question: and what was that credit facility?
Answer: 150.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that amount represent?
| 0.03133 |
CONVFINQA9275 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in addition to the contractual obligations given above , entergy texas expects to contribute approximately $ 17 million to its qualified pension plans and approximately $ 3.2 million to other postretirement health care and life insurance plans in 2017 , although the 2017 required pension contributions will be known with more certainty when the january 1 , 2017 valuations are completed , which is expected by april 1 , 2017 . see 201ccritical accounting estimates - qualified pension and other postretirement benefits 201d below for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding . also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy texas has $ 15.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine capital spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate for entergy texas includes specific investments such as the montgomery county power station discussed below ; transmission projects to enhance reliability , reduce congestion , and enable economic growth ; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers , including initial investment to support advanced metering ; system improvements ; and other investments . estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements , environmental compliance , business opportunities , market volatility , economic trends , business restructuring , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt in note 5 to the financial statements . as discussed above in 201ccapital structure , 201d entergy texas routinely evaluates its ability to pay dividends to entergy corporation from its earnings . sources of capital entergy texas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy texas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy texas require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indenture and other agreements . entergy texas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy texas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 681</td><td>( $ 22068 )</td><td>$ 306</td><td>$ 6287</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy texas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy texas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and $ 4.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what was the drawn amount from the credit facility that was set to expire in august 2021?
Answer: 4.7
Question: and what was that credit facility?
Answer: 150.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.03133
Question: and under this same credit facility, what was the maximum amount of letters of credit that could be issued, in millions?
| 75.0 |
CONVFINQA9276 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
development of prior year incurred losses was $ 135.6 million unfavorable in 2006 , $ 26.4 million favorable in 2005 and $ 249.4 million unfavorable in 2004 . such losses were the result of the reserve development noted above , as well as inher- ent uncertainty in establishing loss and lae reserves . reserves for asbestos and environmental losses and loss adjustment expenses as of year end 2006 , 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) of reserves reflect an estimate for the company 2019s ultimate liability for a&e claims for which ulti- mate value cannot be estimated using traditional reserving techniques . the company 2019s a&e liabilities stem from mt . mckinley 2019s direct insurance business and everest re 2019s assumed reinsurance business . there are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of the company 2019s potential losses from a&e claims . see item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014asbestos and environmental exposures 201d and note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements . mt . mckinley 2019s book of direct a&e exposed insurance is relatively small and homogenous . it also arises from a limited period , effective 1978 to 1984 . the book is based principally on excess liability policies , thereby limiting exposure analysis to a lim- ited number of policies and forms . as a result of this focused structure , the company believes that it is able to comprehen- sively analyze its exposures , allowing it to identify , analyze and actively monitor those claims which have unusual exposure , including policies in which it may be exposed to pay expenses in addition to policy limits or non-products asbestos claims . the company endeavors to be actively engaged with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing eight sip agreements , three of which were executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to exe- cute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders , including those that may not have reported significant a&e losses . everest re 2019s book of assumed reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a modest number of a&e exposed relationships . it also arises from a limited period , effectively 1977 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeli- ness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 125.2</td><td>$ 148.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>152.1</td><td>157.6</td><td>151.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>213.7</td><td>243.5</td><td>272.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>148.7</td><td>123.3</td><td>156.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>650.1</td><td>649.6</td><td>728.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-138.7 ( 138.7 )</td><td>-199.1 ( 199.1 )</td><td>-221.6 ( 221.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 511.4</td><td>$ 450.5</td><td>$ 506.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves determined by the company to be needed over and above those reported by the ceding company . 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 15 .
Question: what were net reserves in 2006?
| 511.4 |
CONVFINQA9277 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
development of prior year incurred losses was $ 135.6 million unfavorable in 2006 , $ 26.4 million favorable in 2005 and $ 249.4 million unfavorable in 2004 . such losses were the result of the reserve development noted above , as well as inher- ent uncertainty in establishing loss and lae reserves . reserves for asbestos and environmental losses and loss adjustment expenses as of year end 2006 , 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) of reserves reflect an estimate for the company 2019s ultimate liability for a&e claims for which ulti- mate value cannot be estimated using traditional reserving techniques . the company 2019s a&e liabilities stem from mt . mckinley 2019s direct insurance business and everest re 2019s assumed reinsurance business . there are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of the company 2019s potential losses from a&e claims . see item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014asbestos and environmental exposures 201d and note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements . mt . mckinley 2019s book of direct a&e exposed insurance is relatively small and homogenous . it also arises from a limited period , effective 1978 to 1984 . the book is based principally on excess liability policies , thereby limiting exposure analysis to a lim- ited number of policies and forms . as a result of this focused structure , the company believes that it is able to comprehen- sively analyze its exposures , allowing it to identify , analyze and actively monitor those claims which have unusual exposure , including policies in which it may be exposed to pay expenses in addition to policy limits or non-products asbestos claims . the company endeavors to be actively engaged with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing eight sip agreements , three of which were executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to exe- cute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders , including those that may not have reported significant a&e losses . everest re 2019s book of assumed reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a modest number of a&e exposed relationships . it also arises from a limited period , effectively 1977 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeli- ness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 125.2</td><td>$ 148.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>152.1</td><td>157.6</td><td>151.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>213.7</td><td>243.5</td><td>272.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>148.7</td><td>123.3</td><td>156.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>650.1</td><td>649.6</td><td>728.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-138.7 ( 138.7 )</td><td>-199.1 ( 199.1 )</td><td>-221.6 ( 221.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 511.4</td><td>$ 450.5</td><td>$ 506.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves determined by the company to be needed over and above those reported by the ceding company . 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 15 .
Question: what were net reserves in 2006?
Answer: 511.4
Question: what were net reserves in 2005?
| 450.5 |
CONVFINQA9278 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
development of prior year incurred losses was $ 135.6 million unfavorable in 2006 , $ 26.4 million favorable in 2005 and $ 249.4 million unfavorable in 2004 . such losses were the result of the reserve development noted above , as well as inher- ent uncertainty in establishing loss and lae reserves . reserves for asbestos and environmental losses and loss adjustment expenses as of year end 2006 , 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) of reserves reflect an estimate for the company 2019s ultimate liability for a&e claims for which ulti- mate value cannot be estimated using traditional reserving techniques . the company 2019s a&e liabilities stem from mt . mckinley 2019s direct insurance business and everest re 2019s assumed reinsurance business . there are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of the company 2019s potential losses from a&e claims . see item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014asbestos and environmental exposures 201d and note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements . mt . mckinley 2019s book of direct a&e exposed insurance is relatively small and homogenous . it also arises from a limited period , effective 1978 to 1984 . the book is based principally on excess liability policies , thereby limiting exposure analysis to a lim- ited number of policies and forms . as a result of this focused structure , the company believes that it is able to comprehen- sively analyze its exposures , allowing it to identify , analyze and actively monitor those claims which have unusual exposure , including policies in which it may be exposed to pay expenses in addition to policy limits or non-products asbestos claims . the company endeavors to be actively engaged with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing eight sip agreements , three of which were executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to exe- cute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders , including those that may not have reported significant a&e losses . everest re 2019s book of assumed reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a modest number of a&e exposed relationships . it also arises from a limited period , effectively 1977 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeli- ness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 125.2</td><td>$ 148.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>152.1</td><td>157.6</td><td>151.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>213.7</td><td>243.5</td><td>272.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>148.7</td><td>123.3</td><td>156.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>650.1</td><td>649.6</td><td>728.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-138.7 ( 138.7 )</td><td>-199.1 ( 199.1 )</td><td>-221.6 ( 221.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 511.4</td><td>$ 450.5</td><td>$ 506.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves determined by the company to be needed over and above those reported by the ceding company . 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 15 .
Question: what were net reserves in 2006?
Answer: 511.4
Question: what were net reserves in 2005?
Answer: 450.5
Question: what was the net change in value?
| 60.9 |
CONVFINQA9279 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
development of prior year incurred losses was $ 135.6 million unfavorable in 2006 , $ 26.4 million favorable in 2005 and $ 249.4 million unfavorable in 2004 . such losses were the result of the reserve development noted above , as well as inher- ent uncertainty in establishing loss and lae reserves . reserves for asbestos and environmental losses and loss adjustment expenses as of year end 2006 , 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) of reserves reflect an estimate for the company 2019s ultimate liability for a&e claims for which ulti- mate value cannot be estimated using traditional reserving techniques . the company 2019s a&e liabilities stem from mt . mckinley 2019s direct insurance business and everest re 2019s assumed reinsurance business . there are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of the company 2019s potential losses from a&e claims . see item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014asbestos and environmental exposures 201d and note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements . mt . mckinley 2019s book of direct a&e exposed insurance is relatively small and homogenous . it also arises from a limited period , effective 1978 to 1984 . the book is based principally on excess liability policies , thereby limiting exposure analysis to a lim- ited number of policies and forms . as a result of this focused structure , the company believes that it is able to comprehen- sively analyze its exposures , allowing it to identify , analyze and actively monitor those claims which have unusual exposure , including policies in which it may be exposed to pay expenses in addition to policy limits or non-products asbestos claims . the company endeavors to be actively engaged with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing eight sip agreements , three of which were executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to exe- cute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders , including those that may not have reported significant a&e losses . everest re 2019s book of assumed reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a modest number of a&e exposed relationships . it also arises from a limited period , effectively 1977 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeli- ness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 125.2</td><td>$ 148.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>152.1</td><td>157.6</td><td>151.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>213.7</td><td>243.5</td><td>272.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>148.7</td><td>123.3</td><td>156.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>650.1</td><td>649.6</td><td>728.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-138.7 ( 138.7 )</td><td>-199.1 ( 199.1 )</td><td>-221.6 ( 221.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 511.4</td><td>$ 450.5</td><td>$ 506.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves determined by the company to be needed over and above those reported by the ceding company . 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 15 .
Question: what were net reserves in 2006?
Answer: 511.4
Question: what were net reserves in 2005?
Answer: 450.5
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 60.9
Question: what was the 2004 value?
| 450.5 |
CONVFINQA9280 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
development of prior year incurred losses was $ 135.6 million unfavorable in 2006 , $ 26.4 million favorable in 2005 and $ 249.4 million unfavorable in 2004 . such losses were the result of the reserve development noted above , as well as inher- ent uncertainty in establishing loss and lae reserves . reserves for asbestos and environmental losses and loss adjustment expenses as of year end 2006 , 7.4% ( 7.4 % ) of reserves reflect an estimate for the company 2019s ultimate liability for a&e claims for which ulti- mate value cannot be estimated using traditional reserving techniques . the company 2019s a&e liabilities stem from mt . mckinley 2019s direct insurance business and everest re 2019s assumed reinsurance business . there are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of the company 2019s potential losses from a&e claims . see item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014asbestos and environmental exposures 201d and note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements . mt . mckinley 2019s book of direct a&e exposed insurance is relatively small and homogenous . it also arises from a limited period , effective 1978 to 1984 . the book is based principally on excess liability policies , thereby limiting exposure analysis to a lim- ited number of policies and forms . as a result of this focused structure , the company believes that it is able to comprehen- sively analyze its exposures , allowing it to identify , analyze and actively monitor those claims which have unusual exposure , including policies in which it may be exposed to pay expenses in addition to policy limits or non-products asbestos claims . the company endeavors to be actively engaged with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing eight sip agreements , three of which were executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to exe- cute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders , including those that may not have reported significant a&e losses . everest re 2019s book of assumed reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a modest number of a&e exposed relationships . it also arises from a limited period , effectively 1977 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeli- ness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 125.2</td><td>$ 148.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>152.1</td><td>157.6</td><td>151.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>213.7</td><td>243.5</td><td>272.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>148.7</td><td>123.3</td><td>156.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>650.1</td><td>649.6</td><td>728.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-138.7 ( 138.7 )</td><td>-199.1 ( 199.1 )</td><td>-221.6 ( 221.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 511.4</td><td>$ 450.5</td><td>$ 506.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves determined by the company to be needed over and above those reported by the ceding company . 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 15 .
Question: what were net reserves in 2006?
Answer: 511.4
Question: what were net reserves in 2005?
Answer: 450.5
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 60.9
Question: what was the 2004 value?
Answer: 450.5
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.13518 |
CONVFINQA9281 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2011 , january 1 , 2011 and january 2 , 2010 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 2011-12 superseded certain pending paragraphs in asu 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income 201d to effectively defer only those changes in asu 2011-05 that related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . in january 2010 , the fasb issued asu no . 2010-06 201cfair value measurements and disclosures 2013 improving disclosures about fair value measurements . 201d asu 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the activity within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy . the updated guidance also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation of assets or liabilities and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value . the updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2009 , with the exception of the new level 3 activity disclosures , which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2010 . the adoption of asu 2010-06 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2011 and prior years . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 29554 and $ 16040 for fiscal 2010 and 2009 , respectively . prior to fiscal 2011 , the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 , were $ 126840 and $ 103989 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at year-end for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were as follows : inventories at fifo , net adjustments to state inventories at lifo inventories at lifo , net december 31 , $ 1941055 102103 $ 2043158 january 1 , $ 1737059 126811 $ 1863870 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312011</td><td>january 12011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1941055</td><td>$ 1737059</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>102103</td><td>126811</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2043158</td><td>$ 1863870</td></tr></table> advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2011 , january 1 , 2011 and january 2 , 2010 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 2011-12 superseded certain pending paragraphs in asu 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income 201d to effectively defer only those changes in asu 2011-05 that related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . in january 2010 , the fasb issued asu no . 2010-06 201cfair value measurements and disclosures 2013 improving disclosures about fair value measurements . 201d asu 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the activity within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy . the updated guidance also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation of assets or liabilities and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value . the updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2009 , with the exception of the new level 3 activity disclosures , which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2010 . the adoption of asu 2010-06 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2011 and prior years . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 29554 and $ 16040 for fiscal 2010 and 2009 , respectively . prior to fiscal 2011 , the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 , were $ 126840 and $ 103989 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at year-end for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were as follows : inventories at fifo , net adjustments to state inventories at lifo inventories at lifo , net december 31 , $ 1941055 102103 $ 2043158 january 1 , $ 1737059 126811 $ 1863870 .
Question: what was the net change in the value of ne inventories at lifo during the year?
| 179288.0 |
CONVFINQA9282 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2011 , january 1 , 2011 and january 2 , 2010 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 2011-12 superseded certain pending paragraphs in asu 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income 201d to effectively defer only those changes in asu 2011-05 that related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . in january 2010 , the fasb issued asu no . 2010-06 201cfair value measurements and disclosures 2013 improving disclosures about fair value measurements . 201d asu 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the activity within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy . the updated guidance also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation of assets or liabilities and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value . the updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2009 , with the exception of the new level 3 activity disclosures , which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2010 . the adoption of asu 2010-06 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2011 and prior years . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 29554 and $ 16040 for fiscal 2010 and 2009 , respectively . prior to fiscal 2011 , the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 , were $ 126840 and $ 103989 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at year-end for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were as follows : inventories at fifo , net adjustments to state inventories at lifo inventories at lifo , net december 31 , $ 1941055 102103 $ 2043158 january 1 , $ 1737059 126811 $ 1863870 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312011</td><td>january 12011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1941055</td><td>$ 1737059</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>102103</td><td>126811</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2043158</td><td>$ 1863870</td></tr></table> advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2011 , january 1 , 2011 and january 2 , 2010 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 2011-12 superseded certain pending paragraphs in asu 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income 201d to effectively defer only those changes in asu 2011-05 that related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . in january 2010 , the fasb issued asu no . 2010-06 201cfair value measurements and disclosures 2013 improving disclosures about fair value measurements . 201d asu 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the activity within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy . the updated guidance also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation of assets or liabilities and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value . the updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2009 , with the exception of the new level 3 activity disclosures , which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2010 . the adoption of asu 2010-06 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2011 and prior years . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 29554 and $ 16040 for fiscal 2010 and 2009 , respectively . prior to fiscal 2011 , the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 , were $ 126840 and $ 103989 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at year-end for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were as follows : inventories at fifo , net adjustments to state inventories at lifo inventories at lifo , net december 31 , $ 1941055 102103 $ 2043158 january 1 , $ 1737059 126811 $ 1863870 .
Question: what was the net change in the value of ne inventories at lifo during the year?
Answer: 179288.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.09619 |
CONVFINQA9283 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what percentage of obligations are due in greater than 5 years?
| 0.58384 |
CONVFINQA9284 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what percentage of obligations are due in greater than 5 years?
Answer: 0.58384
Question: what was the total transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements for 2016 and 2017?
| 275.6 |
CONVFINQA9285 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what percentage of obligations are due in greater than 5 years?
Answer: 0.58384
Question: what was the total transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements for 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 275.6
Question: and including 2015?
| 413.3 |
CONVFINQA9286 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
is expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 11173</td><td>$ 22503</td><td>$ 6154</td><td>$ 2815</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what were receivables in 2017?
| 11173.0 |
CONVFINQA9287 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
is expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 11173</td><td>$ 22503</td><td>$ 6154</td><td>$ 2815</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what were receivables in 2017?
Answer: 11173.0
Question: what were they in 2016?
| 22503.0 |
CONVFINQA9288 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
is expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 11173</td><td>$ 22503</td><td>$ 6154</td><td>$ 2815</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what were receivables in 2017?
Answer: 11173.0
Question: what were they in 2016?
Answer: 22503.0
Question: what is the sum for 2016 and 2017?
| 33676.0 |
CONVFINQA9289 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
is expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 11173</td><td>$ 22503</td><td>$ 6154</td><td>$ 2815</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what were receivables in 2017?
Answer: 11173.0
Question: what were they in 2016?
Answer: 22503.0
Question: what is the sum for 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 33676.0
Question: what is the sum including 2015?
| 39830.0 |
CONVFINQA9290 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
is expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 11173</td><td>$ 22503</td><td>$ 6154</td><td>$ 2815</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what were receivables in 2017?
Answer: 11173.0
Question: what were they in 2016?
Answer: 22503.0
Question: what is the sum for 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 33676.0
Question: what is the sum including 2015?
Answer: 39830.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2014?
| 42645.0 |
CONVFINQA9291 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
except for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .
Question: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?
| 0.0 |
CONVFINQA9292 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
except for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .
Question: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?
Answer: 0.0
Question: then what is the total accretion expense if we also include 2009?
| 0.0 |
CONVFINQA9293 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
except for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .
Question: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?
Answer: 0.0
Question: then what is the total accretion expense if we also include 2009?
Answer: 0.0
Question: what is the balance at december 31 2011?
| 25.0 |
CONVFINQA9294 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
except for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .
Question: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?
Answer: 0.0
Question: then what is the total accretion expense if we also include 2009?
Answer: 0.0
Question: what is the balance at december 31 2011?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what is the balance at january 1 2009?
| 3.0 |
CONVFINQA9295 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
except for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .
Question: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?
Answer: 0.0
Question: then what is the total accretion expense if we also include 2009?
Answer: 0.0
Question: what is the balance at december 31 2011?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what is the balance at january 1 2009?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what is the difference between that balance at december 31 2011 and that of january 1 2009?
| 22.0 |
CONVFINQA9296 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
except for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .
Question: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?
Answer: 0.0
Question: then what is the total accretion expense if we also include 2009?
Answer: 0.0
Question: what is the balance at december 31 2011?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what is the balance at january 1 2009?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what is the difference between that balance at december 31 2011 and that of january 1 2009?
Answer: 22.0
Question: how much does that total represents in relation to that difference?
| 0.0 |
CONVFINQA9297 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
loan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities on loan</td><td>$ 113047</td><td>$ 101438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loan commitments</td><td>12962</td><td>11367</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>10366</td><td>7112</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>3918</td><td>4028</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>letters of credit</td><td>164</td><td>218</td></tr></table> state street corporation 53 .
Question: what was the balance of loan commitments in 2001, in millions?
| 12962.0 |
CONVFINQA9298 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
loan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities on loan</td><td>$ 113047</td><td>$ 101438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loan commitments</td><td>12962</td><td>11367</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>10366</td><td>7112</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>3918</td><td>4028</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>letters of credit</td><td>164</td><td>218</td></tr></table> state street corporation 53 .
Question: what was the balance of loan commitments in 2001, in millions?
Answer: 12962.0
Question: and what was it in 2000, also in millions?
| 11367.0 |
CONVFINQA9299 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
loan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities on loan</td><td>$ 113047</td><td>$ 101438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loan commitments</td><td>12962</td><td>11367</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>10366</td><td>7112</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>3918</td><td>4028</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>letters of credit</td><td>164</td><td>218</td></tr></table> state street corporation 53 .
Question: what was the balance of loan commitments in 2001, in millions?
Answer: 12962.0
Question: and what was it in 2000, also in millions?
Answer: 11367.0
Question: what was, then, the change in balance of loan commitments over the year?
| 1595.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.