answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 1
1.96k
| question
stringlengths 9
50
| id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"answer_start": [
121
],
"text": [
"NiWO4"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.054 | The introduction of BC increased the Jsc values of DSSCs from 13.45mAcm−2 (FeWO4), 11.96mAcm−2 (CoWO4), and 12.60mAcm−2 (NiWO4) to 14.38mAcm−2 (FeWO4/BC), 13.96mAcm−2 (CoWO4/BC), and 14.70mAcm−2 (NiWO4/BC), respectively, and enhanced the FF values from 0.50 (FeWO4), 0.56 (CoWO4) and 0.59 (NiWO4) to 0.55 (FeWO4/BC), 0.63 (CoWO4/BC) and 0.69 (NiWO4/BC), respectively. | What material has Jsc of 12.60mAcm−2? | 37127 |
{
"answer_start": [
71
],
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.10.019 | All measurements of light intensity were under AM1.5G solar simulator (100mWcm−2, Sciencetech Inc., SS-150).Improvement in film quality is known to generate more photoinduced charge and an improvement in photoinduced charge separation enhances the performance of a planer perovskite solar cell. | What is the value of solar? | 22617 |
{
"answer_start": [
49
],
"text": [
"11.09%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.05.027 | The control group without using DIO had a PCE of 11.09%, which is similar to the values obtained in previous studies for this structure . | What is the value of PCE? | 22481 |
{
"answer_start": [
149
],
"text": [
"18.15 mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.014 | The best Phen-I device shows a PCE value as high as 18.13%, while the control device showed only the best PCE of 10.7%, with Voc of 1.10 V, a Jsc of 18.15 mA/cm2, and FF of 53.56%, the improvement in the performance of Phen-I device is attributed to higher Jsc and FF. | What is the value of Jsc? | 4703 |
{
"answer_start": [
157
],
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.05.004 | DSPV cells were assembled by clamping together the platinum coated SnO2 counter electrode and the dye adsorbed TiO2 working electrode with an active area of 0.25 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 16073 |
{
"answer_start": [
181
],
"text": [
"1.04 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA02502H | Using a doped spiro-OMeTAD HTL, we observed a dramatically enhanced performance with the highest PCE of 14.0%, combined with a JSC of 19.5 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.04 V, and an FF of 69.0%, mainly due to the improved conductivity of the spiro-OMeTAD HTL, which is consistent with previously published results. | What is the value of VOC? | 7737 |
{
"answer_start": [
167
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.003 | The prepared platinum-coated counter electrode was then calcined at 450 °C for 20 min under ambient air atmosphere.For preparation of electrolyte, initially 0.04 g of TiO2 (5 nm) nanoparticles act as inorganic filler was uniformly dispersed into 50 ml of acetonitrile. | What is ? | 29805 |
{
"answer_start": [
242
],
"text": [
"15.7mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.037 | Using the graphene/PEDOT:PSS CE, the Jsc, Voc, FF and η increased with increasing the graphene contents from 0.01wt.% to 0.05wt.%, and affording the highest η of 7.86% for DSSC at graphene content of 0.05wt.%, and corresponding to the Jsc of 15.7mAcm−2, Voc of 0.77V, and FF of 0.65. | What is the value of Jsc? | 11145 |
{
"answer_start": [
46
],
"text": [
"FTO"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.181 | The cell prepared using sputtered platinum on FTO substrate as counter electrode displayed open circuit voltage VOC of 0.66V,short circuit current density JSC of 11.80mAcm−2, fill factor (FF) of 0.70 and conversion efficiency (η) of 5.51% respectively as shown in . | What is substrate? | 20425 |
{
"answer_start": [
124
],
"text": [
"7.8%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.04.021 | At graphene deposition time of 1 min, the short circuit current (JSC) reaches a peak value of 17.55 mA/cm2, yielding PCE of 7.8% and showing a 9.1% increase compared to the device without graphene. | What is the value of PCE? | 28735 |
{
"answer_start": [
92
],
"text": [
"11.2%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.009 | When the CH3NH3Br concentration increased to 2.5mgml−1, the PCE increased from 9.9% (N2) to 11.2% (DMSO). | What is the value of PCE? | 23974 |
{
"answer_start": [
39
],
"text": [
"0.158 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.11.002 | Cell active area tested with a mask of 0.158 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 22763 |
{
"answer_start": [
128
],
"text": [
"18.7%"
]
} | 10.1039/C9SC01184F | Introduction of extra thiophene rings between the ATT central core and triarylamine yielded TTA3 and led to an increased PCE of 18.7%. | What is the value of PCE? | 30479 |
{
"answer_start": [
154
],
"text": [
"7.56%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA10269C | In DSSC device applications, it increases the short-circuit current density (JSC) from 15.69 to 16.52 mA cm−2, thus resulting in an enhanced PCE value of 7.56% compared to the reference DSSC (i.e., PCE = 7.15%). | What is the value of PCE? | 5952 |
{
"answer_start": [
179
],
"text": [
"4.48mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.03.027 | The HTL-free cell presents poor photovoltaic performance with a PCE of mere 1.28% owing to its extremely low values in short-circuit current density (JSC) and fill factor (FF) of 4.48mA/cm2 and 34.1%, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 10259 |
{
"answer_start": [
20
],
"text": [
"10.5%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.05.053 | For SK202, a PCE of 10.5% was obtained, with a Jsc of 17.5mAcm−2, Voc of 844mV, and FF of 71.1%. | What is the value of PCE? | 11071 |
{
"answer_start": [
86
],
"text": [
"0.61V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.102 | However, the Jsc and Voc of DSSC with the TiO2 film thickness of 2.0μm (8.5mA/cm2 and 0.61V) are smaller than those of DSSC with the TiO2 film thickness of 1.5μm (9.2mA/cm2 and 0.62V), respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 19529 |
{
"answer_start": [
135
],
"text": [
"12.29 mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.126 | Voc is increased from 0.72 V of N719 alone to 0.80 V of PbS (60 s) + N719, though at the sacrifice of reduced Jsc from 13.28 mA/cm2 to 12.29 mA/cm2. | What is the value of Jsc? | 19204 |
{
"answer_start": [
47
],
"text": [
"6.12mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.05.007 | The TPA-B2-sensitized solar cell gave a Jsc of 6.12mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.679V, and a ff of 0.64, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency of 2.65%., it is clear that the photovoltaic performances of the DSSCs can be evidently affected by introducing a benzimidazole unit and a substituted benzimidaole unit into the formwork of TPA core. | What is the value of Jsc? | 27049 |
{
"answer_start": [
116
],
"text": [
"0.842 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.089 | Cell-TiO2-S reveals a Voc of 0.901 V, a Jsc of 7.21 mA cm−2 and a η of 4.66%, whereas Cell-TiO2-P presents a Voc of 0.842 V, a Jsc of 10.23 mA cm−2 and a η of 6.29%. | What is the value of Voc? | 12690 |
{
"answer_start": [
119
],
"text": [
"772 mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.055 | MXD4 sensitized cell gave a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 11.5 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 772 mV, and a fill factor (ff) of 0.68, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 6.04%. | What is the value of Voc? | 19852 |
{
"answer_start": [
55
],
"text": [
"9.4%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10305G | After optimisation, the best device displayed a PCE of 9.4%. | What is the value of PCE? | 30510 |
{
"answer_start": [
48
],
"text": [
"8.19%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00278E | For reference, the Pt-based DSSCs show a PCE of 8.19% (Voc = 0.726 V, Jsc = 16.74 mA cm−2, and FF = 0.674). | What is the value of PCE? | 30222 |
{
"answer_start": [
220
],
"text": [
"4.89%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.068 | The DSSCs sensitized by FWD7 and FWD8 exhibited good parameters: short-circuit current density (Jsc) to be 9.88 and 11.59mAcm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) to be 0.69 and 0.75V, and power conversion efficiency (η) to be 4.89% and 6.01%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 20763 |
{
"answer_start": [
177
],
"text": [
"Sp01"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | According to Rakstys et al., devices with HTM 16 and 17 achieved a high VOC of 1.15 V and 1.13 V, respectively, owing to having a more stabilized and deeper HOMO level than HTM Sp01 (VOC = 1.07 V). | What material has VOC of 1.07 V? | 36988 |
{
"answer_start": [
57
],
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.042 | 50μm polymer spacer and the active area of the cells was 0.25cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 789 |
{
"answer_start": [
119
],
"text": [
"iodide/triiodide"
]
} | 10.1039/C0CC00749H | By a comparison with the previously investigated Ru dye, the HOMO potential of 1 was considered to be too close to the iodide/triiodide redox couple. | What is redox couple? | 4114 |
{
"answer_start": [
373
],
"text": [
"0.09%"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA13002A | 1 and Table 1, one can see that the short-circuit current density (JSC), open-circuit voltage (VOC), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (η) of a DSSC with a PEDOT counter electrode were 10.7 mA cm−2, 0.73 V, 0.443, and 3.46%, respectively, whereas a DSSC with a ZrN (crystal nanoparticles of 37 nm) counter electrode exhibited a negligible power conversion (0.09%). | What is the value of η? | 2278 |
{
"answer_start": [
63
],
"text": [
"4.1%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.10.008 | The η of the Flemion-gel-based DSSC containing 0.6 M DMPII was 4.1%, while that of the acetonitrile-based DSSC was 5.1%. | What is the value of η? | 27927 |
{
"answer_start": [
47
],
"text": [
"2.4mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.062 | The I-Br/PHJ shows a very low PCE (1.0%), Jsc (2.4mAcm−2) and a very high Voc of 0.81V with a relatively high coverage. | What is the value of Jsc? | 25803 |
{
"answer_start": [
153
],
"text": [
"60"
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.123 | Pt/carbon and carbon films were prepared as follows: the edges of fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass substrates (Asahi glass) were covered by a 60 μm thick tape. | What is tin oxide? | 14240 |
{
"answer_start": [
206
],
"text": [
"7.49%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.099 | Investigation of the DSSCs performance shows that CD2-based DSSCs exhibit a high PCE value of 7.91%, higher than that of CD1-based DSSCs (6.29%), even higher than that of the reference DSSCs based on N719 (7.49%). | What is the value of PCE? | 29326 |
{
"answer_start": [
101
],
"text": [
"1000 Wm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2012.05.002 | The JV curves were measured by a Keithley 2400 digital source meter, with illumination provided by a 1000 Wm−2 solar simulator (1 sun at 1.5 am spectrum). | What is the value of illumination? | 28896 |
{
"answer_start": [
81
],
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.092 | The performance of the fabricated cells was evaluated under AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2) with an active area of 0.25 cm2.(a) and S3 show the surface morphologies of the TiO2 NTs obtained through two-step anodization. | What is the value of illumination? | 2510 |
{
"answer_start": [
22
],
"text": [
"0.70 V"
]
} | 10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60737-2 | It exhibited a Voc of 0.70 V, Jsc of 15.49 mA/cm2 and FF of 0.67. | What is the value of Voc? | 12839 |
{
"answer_start": [
84
],
"text": [
"80 s"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.023 | Compared to sputtering time of 40 s, the Pt films fabricated by sputtering times of 80 s and 120 s would have smaller grain sizes and more grain boundaries containing more defects, resulting in worse charge transport efficiency and thereby smaller Jsc of the DSSCs, as shown in The photovoltaic characteristics of DSSCs fabricated by various Pt sputtering times are shown in . | What is the value of time? | 16966 |
{
"answer_start": [
197
],
"text": [
"12.80%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.081 | The optimized PSCs delivered a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 20.61mA/cm3, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 939.4mV, fill factor of (FF) of 0.661 and overall conversion efficiency (η) of 12.80% when the thickness of BL-TiO2 was about 31nm(R=2.4). | What is the value of η? | 26065 |
{
"answer_start": [
69
],
"text": [
"1.71%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.007 | However, the device PCEs sharply increase after TiCl4 treatment from 1.71% to 2.21% at 20 nm and from 1.53% to 2.07% at 68 nm, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 11880 |
{
"answer_start": [
249
],
"text": [
"0.467V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.cdc.2019.100256 | In contrast to compounds 3a-3c which recorded the lowest performance, compound 2c and compound 1c with a methoxy substituent were the top two with the highest conversion efficiency (0.091%, 2c; 0.60%, 1c) and open circuit photovoltage (Voc) values (0.467V, 2c; 0.430V, 1c). | What is the value of Voc? | 18981 |
{
"answer_start": [
46
],
"text": [
"7.20%"
]
} | 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63361-9 | The DSSC with NiS/Ni3S2 CE exhibited a PCE of 7.20%, which was comparable to that of a cell employing platinum CE (7.56%). | What is the value of PCE? | 26158 |
{
"answer_start": [
147
],
"text": [
"42.1%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP05544C | Devices loaded with 5 wt% and 10 wt% SiO2 NS, i.e., ZS5 and ZS10, showed lower performances, yielding a Jsc ≈ 8.40 mA cm−2, a Voc ≈ 609 mV, a FF ≈ 42.1% and a PCE ≈ 2.15%, for ZS5 and a Jsc ≈ 6.87 mA cm−2, a Voc ≈ 596 mV, a FF ≈ 41.8%, and a PCE ≈ 1.71% for the ZS10 device. | What is the value of FF? | 32535 |
{
"answer_start": [
62
],
"text": [
"14.07%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.003 | After optimizing the MWCNT film thickness, the PCE as high as 14.07% was achieved, which is obviously higher than that of the C-PSCs based on drop casting MWCNT. | What is the value of PCE? | 19882 |
{
"answer_start": [
139
],
"text": [
"3.95%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2017.05.020 | When only decreasing the adding amount of TBP to 100mM (doping with Li-TFSI/TBP of 30 mM/100mM), the PCE of PSC based on Q221 decreased to 3.95% with a remarkable loss in Voc and FF. | What is the value of PCE? | 1943 |
{
"answer_start": [
80
],
"text": [
"16.14mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.078 | For pure C based PSCs, the maximum PCE was 9.36% with a VOC of 0.94V and JSC of 16.14mAcm−2. | What is the value of JSC? | 23826 |
{
"answer_start": [
246
],
"text": [
"7.56%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA00199K | More specifically, as a gold standard, the Pt-CE-DSSCs exhibited an open-circle potential (Voc) of 0.73 V, a short-circle photocurrent (Jsc) of 15.7 mA cm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.66, yielding a photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.56%. | What is the value of PCE? | 28775 |
{
"answer_start": [
125
],
"text": [
"0.77 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA10423K | 4a and b.Using AS1 and AS2 as dyes, the devices showed a short circuit photocurrent (Jsc) of 6.91 and 8.12 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.77 V and a fill factor of 0.75 and 0.74, respectively, resulting in an efficiency of 4.00% and 4.59%.As expected, the performance of the AS4 and AS5-based devices are considerably better, especially in terms of Jsc. | What is the value of Voc? | 21615 |
{
"answer_start": [
79
],
"text": [
"11.45mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.035 | However, cell-2 displays a lower Jsc value of 9.11mAcm−2 than the Jsc value of 11.45mAcm−2 for cell-1. | What is the value of Jsc? | 6999 |
{
"answer_start": [
83
],
"text": [
"0.152cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.12.029 | The active area of the N719 dye-coated the different four hierarchicalSnO2 film is 0.152cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 30384 |
{
"answer_start": [
93
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C5NJ00299K | Although the efficiency of 1.18% is not competitive to the state of the art Sb2S3-sensitized TiO2 nanowire device (3–4%), our study definitely provides a useful spray technique for improving the photovoltaic performance of TiO2 nanowire/Sb2S3/CuI/Au solar cells, which could be helpful in the design of other highly efficient solid-state semiconductor-sensitized solar cells.This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. | What is semiconductor? | 30633 |
{
"answer_start": [
49
],
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.04.043 | The active area was controlled at a dimension of 0.25cm2 by adhering 60μm thick polyester tape on the Pt cathode. | What is the value of active area? | 4109 |
{
"answer_start": [
87
],
"text": [
"4.66%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.208 | The DSSCs using the MoS2 and RGO CEs exhibit poor conversion efficiencies of 3.60% and 4.66% due to their poor electrocatalytic activity, while the DSSCs based on the MoS2@RGO CE has an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 660mV, a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 17.20mAcm−2, a fill factor (FF) of 0.60, and a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.82% higher than Pt film (6.44%). | What is the value of PCE? | 21020 |
{
"answer_start": [
121
],
"text": [
"0.01 cm2"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10727C | The devices were then measured under an AM 1.5G spectrum with an irradiance of 1000 W m−2, with a shadow mask (aperture: 0.01 cm2) to prohibit lateral current collection from outside the active area.Mixed cation perovskite layers with varying bromide to iodide ratios were deposited on glass/ITO/TiO2/IPH substrates. | What is the value of active area? | 9311 |
{
"answer_start": [
162
],
"text": [
"0.38 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.03.054 | Especially, the ZnP–A2 assembly with a cyanoacrylic acid group based solar cell has the highest conversion efficiency of 0.81% with a JSC of 3.0 mA/cm2, a VOC of 0.38 V, and a FF of 0.71 among these assembly based solar cells. | What is the value of VOC? | 2970 |
{
"answer_start": [
212
],
"text": [
"8.68%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC00610E | In contrast, benzothiadiazole-containing dyes XW30 and XW32 afforded lower Voc values of 678 mV and 677 mV as well as lower Jsc values of 19.67 mA cm−2 and 20.13 mA cm−2, respectively, resulting in lower PCEs of 8.68% and 8.82%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 6058 |
{
"answer_start": [
51
],
"text": [
"20.1%"
]
} | 10.1039/C9SC01184F | Thiophene-based Z26 exhibited an impressive PCE of 20.1%. | What is the value of PCE? | 4643 |
{
"answer_start": [
384
],
"text": [
"5mm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.090 | Resulted supernatant after reaction was filtered to remove any remaining particles and then analyzed by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (ESI-MS) (GCT Premier, Waters, USA), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) (IS50R, Thermo fisher, USA) and 1H NMR (Advance 400 spectrometer, Bruker, USA).Before measurements, the as-prepared cells were shielded by black masks (5×5mm2 aperture) to determine the active area. | What is the value of active area? | 7015 |
{
"answer_start": [
248
],
"text": [
"6.0%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | Their best solar cell achieved a VOC of 1010 mV, JSC of 13.8 mA cm−2, FF of 0.59 and PCE of 8.2%, making it more efficient than the spiro-OMeTAD-based reference device (5.6%) and even more efficient than a liquid DSC based on the same electrolyte (6.0%).Kashif et al. | What is the value of PCE? | 17126 |
{
"answer_start": [
39
],
"text": [
"11.90%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR01433F | More importantly, we achieved a PCE of 11.90% based on a glass/ITO substrate, which is comparable to what is obtained with high-temperature approaches. | What is the value of PCE? | 24561 |
{
"answer_start": [
115
],
"text": [
"73.34%"
]
} | 10.1039/C9DT00930B | And in reverse scanning, the control device shows a PCE of 16.99%, with Jsc = 21.79 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.06 V and FF = 73.34%. | What is the value of FF? | 26484 |
{
"answer_start": [
56
],
"text": [
"0.16%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2004.09.026 | The fill factor (ff) and η were calculated to be 55 and 0.16%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 8131 |
{
"answer_start": [
43
],
"text": [
"0.2cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.236 | The active area of our device was fixed at 0.2cm2.The crystallinity and morphology of the prepared films were characterized by X-ray diffraction (Bruker-AXS D8 advance diffractometer). | What is the value of active area? | 7233 |
{
"answer_start": [
233
],
"text": [
"694mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.075 | Together, after TiCl4 treatment, the obtained TiO2 nanolayer with rough surface enchances the Jsc to 7.576mAcm−2by increasing the dye adsorption density to 6.79nmolcm−1, and also improves the open circuit voltage (Voc) from 680mV to 694mV, and fill factor (FF) from 55.2% to 59.5%, respectively, due to decrease of photoelectron recombination phenomenon. | What is the value of Voc? | 24117 |
{
"answer_start": [
110
],
"text": [
"ITO"
]
} | 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.069 | It also has a low work function of ≈ 4.30 eV, which offers a suitable energy level to reduce work function of ITO or metal electrodes, and to match with LUMO levels of various fullerene-based acceptors such as [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM), PC71 BM, and indene-C60 bis-adduct (ICBA). | What is ? | 16863 |
{
"answer_start": [
89
],
"text": [
"0.98V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.130 | From a, we can obtain that the PCE of SAM-unmodified PSC is 11.74% (Jsc=20.30mAcm−2, Voc=0.98V and FF=0.59) under FS, while 14.65% (Jsc=20.55mAcm−2, Voc=0.99V and FF=0.72) under RS. | What is the value of Voc? | 7980 |
{
"answer_start": [
96
],
"text": [
"1.69mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.04.033 | A change to dye [Cu(1)(3)]+ and redox couple [Cu(3)2]+/2+ lead to a small increase in JSC (1.10–1.69mAcm−2) and VOC (558–662mV). | What is the value of JSC? | 8264 |
{
"answer_start": [
83
],
"text": [
"8"
]
} | 10.1039/C9NJ01029G | This has reflected well with enhanced PCEs of these sensitizers in the range of 5.38% to 6.00%. | What material has PCE of 5.38%? | 36958 |
{
"answer_start": [
155
],
"text": [
"15.10%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.112 | These Jsc, Voc and FF values indicate that after IPA treatment the PSCs achieved about three percentage point promotion of the champion PCE from 12.18% to 15.10% with reverse scan and 9.53% to 13.47% with forward scan. | What is the value of PCE? | 33875 |
{
"answer_start": [
157
],
"text": [
"17"
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA09122B | They include lower nonradiative recombination states, band edge disorder, and Urbach energy coupled with a higher absorption coefficient, which resulted in ∼17.63% PCE. | What is ? | 15569 |
{
"answer_start": [
168
],
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TC00554C | Alternative organic redox couples were also introduced to overcome the limitations of the classical iodide/triiodide couple, but they suffer from the similarity to the I−/I3− couple as they also involve a two-electron redox process.In spite of these considerations, at present, the most exploited redox shuttle is the iodide/triiodide redox couple which, despite its corrosive character and some diffusion limitations, is still preferred since it leads to more stable and efficient cells due to extremely slow triiodide/TiO2 recombination kinetics and a rapid regeneration process of the oxidized dye. | What is redox couple? | 26027 |
{
"answer_start": [
170
],
"text": [
"0.350 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.06.017 | Under standard global AM 1.5 G (100 mW/cm2) solar condition, the P3OT sensitized solar cell gave a short-circuit current (JSC) of 0.350 mA, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.350 V, effective area (Sea) of 0.482 cm2 and fill factor (FF) of 0.338, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 0.086%; the P3OT/Precursor sensitized solar cell gave a short-circuit current (JSC) of 0.406 mA, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.510 V, effective area (Sea) of 0.375 cm2 and fill factor (FF) of 0.688, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 0.380%. | What is the value of VOC? | 10395 |
{
"answer_start": [
163
],
"text": [
"Al"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.066 | The hole mobility was measured using SCLC analysis through the hole-only device from the structure of ITO-/-spin-coated and transfer printed PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3/MoOX/Al. | What is ITO? | 33619 |
{
"answer_start": [
106
],
"text": [
"7.75%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.030 | The DSSC with the optimized SAT gradient-ascent photoanode has the maximum Jsc of 17.7 mA cm−2 and PCE of 7.75%, higher than those of the DSSC with USAT photoanode by 4.1% and 8.7%, remarkably higher than those of the conventional DSSC by 23.7% and 28.0%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 32421 |
{
"answer_start": [
14
],
"text": [
"14.32%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA07541J | With a PCE of 14.32% from the involvement of an optimized CeOx ETL through adjusting the precursor solution, and a higher PCE of 17.04% through introducing a [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) interfacial layer between the CeOx ETL and the perovskite layer, the present work about CeOx-based PSCs renders low-temperature solution-processed CeOx an excellent ETL for high performance perovskite solar cells with improved stability.With their low cost, easy processing and high efficiency, organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells (PSCs) represent one of the most promising photovoltaics for the future. | What is the value of PCE? | 7918 |
{
"answer_start": [
154
],
"text": [
"7.17%"
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM12181B | The introduction of a 3,4-dibutyl-thiophene ring into D–π–A dyes reduces the sensitizer aggregation and allows the preparation of solar cells with PCE of 7.17% and 6.27% without the use of coadsorbant agents.In recent years environmental issues have led to the search of sustainable energy generated from renewable sources like solar cells. | What is the value of PCE? | 11419 |
{
"answer_start": [
51
],
"text": [
"3.09%"
]
} | 10.1039/C1EE01873F | Using MoO3 as an ABL, an optimized PCE approaching 3.09% was achieved by modifying the transmittance of sol–gel derived ZnO thin film to 95%. | What is the value of PCE? | 12442 |
{
"answer_start": [
517
],
"text": [
"3.41%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.01.007 | It also displays literature values of the similar studies (i.e.metal oxide photoanodes, ‘1 sun’ illumination, electrolyte and N719 dye) and compares power conversion efficiencies and other DSSC performance parameters with our layered ZrO2-modified ZnO/TiO2 photoanodes.For comparison, the reference cell assembled with ZnO/TiO2 photoelectrode exhibited a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 8.9 mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.75 V, a fill factor (FF) of 50% and an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 3.41%. | What is the value of η? | 2329 |
{
"answer_start": [
318
],
"text": [
"12.5%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.138 | presents the J–V characteristics of the best performance devices measured under the illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2, and their corresponding photovoltaic performance data of the pero-SCs are listed in , the CuSCN-based device shows an excellent PCE of 16.4% while the PEDOT:PSS-based device only yielded a PCE of 12.5%. | What is the value of PCE? | 16659 |
{
"answer_start": [
82
],
"text": [
"0.72V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.02.014 | The VOC of all double layer devices were almost the same, being in the range 0.71–0.72V, while FF of the cells varied with HCs: nanoparticles weight ratio, being in the range 0.66–0.72. | What is the value of VOC? | 26271 |
{
"answer_start": [
30
],
"text": [
"5.81%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107676 | WL6 demonstrates a lower η of 5.81% due to its decreased Jsc of 13.16mAcm2, which can be well explained by its narrow UV–Vis absorption range and lower molar extinction coefficient. | What is the value of η? | 13006 |
{
"answer_start": [
162
],
"text": [
"14.2"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA08963H | A later paper by the same group using formamidinium iodide show perovskite conversion with less than 30 min of heating the organic component and an efficiency of 14.2%. | What is ? | 11651 |
{
"answer_start": [
296
],
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.088 | The whole fabrication process was completed after the thermal evaporation of 10nm BCP and 100nm Ag on top of the PCBM layer under the high vacuum of 4×10−4 Pa.The characteristic curves of current density vs voltage (J-V) of the perovskite solar cells were tested under the illumination of 1 sun (100mW/cm2) on a solar cell testing system consisting of a computer-programmed sourcemeter (Keithley 2400) and a solar simulator (AM 1.5G, Newport), with the light density of 100mW/cm2 calibrated by a standard Si photodiode. | What is the value of illumination? | 2621 |
{
"answer_start": [
97
],
"text": [
"577 mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.006 | Under similar experimental conditions, dye 15 produces higher values of Jsc (2.07 mA cm−2), Voc (577 mV) and FF (0.65), resulting in an about 3 times higher efficiency (0.8%). | What is the value of Voc? | 20503 |
{
"answer_start": [
98
],
"text": [
"9.08mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.143 | Under the same condition, the quasi-solid-state DSSCs based on sensitizer FNE58 provided a Jsc of 9.08mAcm−2, a Voc of 628mV, and an FF of 0.70, corresponding to a PCE of 3.99%, while FNE59 based quasi-solid-state DSSC gave a Jsc of 12.06mAcm−2, a Voc of 703mV, and an FF of 0.71, corresponding to a PCE of 6.02%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 15586 |
{
"answer_start": [
0
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.026 | Under illumination, the cell produces current through an external load connected to the electrodes | What is anode? | 38447 |
{
"answer_start": [
80
],
"text": [
"1cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.11.028 | The champion PCE of 14.2% is obtained for large area PSC with an active area of 1cm2, increased by about 47.9% compared to 9.6% of its plain counterpart. | What is the value of active area? | 16837 |
{
"answer_start": [
115
],
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127636 | After this time, the current density-voltage characteristics of the devices were measured under an illumination of 100mW/cm2 with an AM1.5G sun simulator. | What is the value of illumination? | 26911 |
{
"answer_start": [
78
],
"text": [
"8.34%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA14051J | Therefore, the DSSC with the rGO–CoS composite CE achieved an enhanced PCE of 8.34% that is greatly increased by 33% compared with 6.26% of the CoS CE-based DSSC. | What is the value of PCE? | 8986 |
{
"answer_start": [
33
],
"text": [
"85mWcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.07.006 | EIS measurements were done under 85mWcm−2 light illumination by using an Autolab PGSTAT potentiostat/galvanostat-84610. | What is the value of illumination? | 28814 |
{
"answer_start": [
16
],
"text": [
"5.06%"
]
} | 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63361-9 | The best PCE of 5.06% resulted for the cell based on FeCo2 alloy CE. | What is the value of PCE? | 16265 |
{
"answer_start": [
138
],
"text": [
"8.70%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.003 | Conversely, among the metalloid-doped GnP-CEs, SbGnP-CE exhibited a higher Rct value and lower power conversion efficiency (PCE) value of 8.70% and 6.60% with N719 and SGT-130 dyes, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 27488 |
{
"answer_start": [
30
],
"text": [
"717±3mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.059 | In particular, 11.2±0.2mAcm2, 717±3mV, 71±1% and 5.71±0.09% were obtained as Short Circuit Current Density (JSC), Open Circuit Potential (VOC), Fill Facto (FF) and Efficiency (η) respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 24477 |
{
"answer_start": [
191
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA14210H | Bao acknowledges the support from ARC DECRA and MCN Technology Fellowship/ANFF-Victoria.† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: A video demonstration of good adhesion between TiO2 film and flexible substrate, laser sintering effect on ITO/PEN film, optical difference of difference layer, different sintering effect on TiO2 film by different laser sources, proposed sintering mode by line laser source, and diffuse reflectance of TiO2 films. | What is ? | 3747 |
{
"answer_start": [
192
],
"text": [
"17.76%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104671 | Most importantly, the best photovoltaic performances with the highest JSC (23.52mAcm−2), VOC (1.05V), and FF (71.90%) were obtained when 1.00mgmL−1 MgAc2 was added, resulting in a best PCE of 17.76%. | What is the value of PCE? | 21033 |
{
"answer_start": [
180
],
"text": [
"6.412%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.03.012 | Among these phosphates-PEDOT hybrid films, the Ni3(PO4)2-based composite CE with 50mg/ml Ni3(PO4)2 in PEDOT precursor solution, shows the best power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.412%, which is higher than the original PEDOT PCE (5.443%) and comparable with the conventional magnetron sputtering Pt PCE (6.307%). | What is the value of PCE? | 10528 |
{
"answer_start": [
181
],
"text": [
"0.74V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.063 | The short-circuit current density (Jsc), the open-circuit voltage (Voc), the fill fact (FF), and the overall conversion efficiency (η) of the DSC with Pt electrode are 17.36mAcm−2, 0.74V, 0.67, and 8.61%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 26337 |
{
"answer_start": [
206
],
"text": [
"9.2%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Yang and coworkers also fabricated two PHJ devices based on ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3−xClx/PC60BM/Al and ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3−xClx/ZnO/Al, yielding PCEs of 11.5% and 10.53% in a rigid substrate, respectively (a 9.2% efficiency was achieved in PET/ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3−xClx/PC60BM/Al-based flexible devices). | What is the value of PCE? | 4777 |
{
"answer_start": [
98
],
"text": [
"0.2 Sun"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA00563E | 4(a) shows representative current–voltage characteristics of the devices measured under 1 Sun and 0.2 Sun illumination, and the average values of photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 2. | What is the value of illumination? | 2653 |
{
"answer_start": [
195
],
"text": [
"0.66V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.034 | Compared to Dye 2 and Dye 3, the Dye 1-sensitized cell exhibited better photovoltaic performances with a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 13.39mAcm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.66V, and a filled factor (FF) of 0.60, corresponding to a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.33% (). | What is the value of Voc? | 652 |
{
"answer_start": [
0
],
"text": [
"46.58%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.271 | shows J×V curves and IPCE spectra for the samples using different ZnO layers, while shows the photovoltaic parameters for these cells | What is the value of FF? | 38576 |
{
"answer_start": [
34
],
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.034 | This phenomenon revealed that the I−/I3− redox reaction on the surface of NiCo2S4/C CE hardly impact the stability of I−/I3− for NiCo2S4/C. | What is redox reaction? | 3636 |
Subsets and Splits