answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 1
1.96k
| question
stringlengths 9
50
| id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"answer_start": [
28
],
"text": [
"Pt0.28Ni99.72"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.063 | Especially, the DSSC with a Pt0.28Ni99.72 CE produces a remarkable η=6.42%, Voc=0.739V, Jsc=12.8mAcm−2, FF=68.6%. | What material has Voc of 0.739V? | 36985 |
{
"answer_start": [
236
],
"text": [
"8.61%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4FD00155A | The application of the LPD-TiO2 nanolayer to a rutile TiO2 NR array was found to significantly enhance the photocurrent density of the corresponding solar cells without obviously compromising Voc (1.01 V), upgrading the η from 3.67% to 8.61%. | What is the value of η? | 17565 |
{
"answer_start": [
512
],
"text": [
"5.27%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA02529F | 3) were obtained by applying a potential scan from 0 V (short-circuit conditions) to the open-circuit potential, under constant 1 sun (AM 1.5G) illumination conditions and under dark and the electrical parameters are included in Table 4.It must be pointed out that the C2-electrolyte, which presented the highest conductivity and highest diffusion coefficients, attained the highest open circuit voltage (Voc) of 720 mV and the highest fill factor (FF) of 0.7 and an overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.27%; however, the photocurrent density (Jsc) was lower than the corresponding values of the C1-electrolyte. | What is the value of PCE? | 2467 |
{
"answer_start": [
385
],
"text": [
"70%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA08503J | The PSC devices made with CW4 (35) as the HTM with tBP and LiTFSI as additives outperformed the spiro-OMeTAD (PCE = 14.32%, JSC = 19.35 mA cm−2, VOC = 1.02 V, and FF = 73%)-based device with a PCE of 16.56% (JSC = 21.75 mA cm−2, VOC = 1.05 V, and FF = 72%), whereas CW3 (34) and CW5 (36)-based PSCs exhibited a JSC of 16.49 and 15.39 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.989 V and 1.005 V, FF of 67% and 70%, and PCE of 10.94% and 10.76%, respectively, under similar fabrication conditions.Wang et al. | What is the value of FF? | 719 |
{
"answer_start": [
89
],
"text": [
"8.64±0.82%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.054 | Apparently, devices prepared from 0.06M pecursor solution show the lowest average PCE of 8.64±0.82%, with Voc of 0.89V, Jsc of 16.67mAcm−2, and FF of 56.04%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 29356 |
{
"answer_start": [
271
],
"text": [
"69.01%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.023 | However, the performance increased for the DCM-CH3NH3PbBr3 solar cell after annealing the as-deposited DCM-CH3NH3PbBr3 at 100 °C for 10 min: the Voc increased from 1.09 V to 1.36 V, the Jsc increased from 4.59 mA cm−2 to 6.52 mA cm−2, and the FF increased from 44.85% to 69.01% after annealing. | What is the value of FF? | 13309 |
{
"answer_start": [
187
],
"text": [
"66.8%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP05398B | 2b, electrode 4 showed the short-circuit current density (Jsc), open circuit voltage (Voc), energy conversion coefficient (η), and fill factor (FF) to be 15.8 mA cm−2, 0.749 V, 7.91% and 66.8%, respectively, (see Table 1). | What is the value of FF? | 12186 |
{
"answer_start": [
0
],
"text": [
"6.17%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.025 | By introducing RGO, the NiCo2O4 nanobelts are dispersed on graphene sheets uniformly | What is the value of PCE? | 37949 |
{
"answer_start": [
223
],
"text": [
"0.43 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.086 | This can be attributed to the upward shifting of the conduction band position, allowing the reduction in the electron recombination at the photoanode surface On the other hand, the SnO2-12L CaCO3 photoanode showed a Voc of 0.43 V, a Jsc of 10.03 mA cm−2, a ff of 51%, and a decreased efficiency of 2.2% compared to that of the SnO2-6L CaCO3 photoanode. | What is the value of Voc? | 10971 |
{
"answer_start": [
76
],
"text": [
"11.15%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00377C | 4a and Table 1, the PSC with the pristine 1D RTNR array ETL showed a PCE of 11.15%. | What is the value of PCE? | 19298 |
{
"answer_start": [
128
],
"text": [
"Ag"
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE02194D | Although several papers have reported PrSCs that use flexible transparent conducting electrodes (e.g., aluminum-doped ZnO (AZO)/Ag/AZO and PEDOT:PSS) instead of FTO or ITO, PCEs of the flexible devices were lower than rigid devices due to inferior electrical and optical properties of flexible electrodes. | What is ITO? | 405 |
{
"answer_start": [
50
],
"text": [
"1"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.114 | The active area of the resultant DSSC device is 0.16cm2. | What material has active area of 0.16cm2? | 36428 |
{
"answer_start": [
31
],
"text": [
"2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.05.053 | Relatively high Jsc (4.4 and 5.2mA/cm2) and Voc (0.82 and 0.78V) values were measured for the devices containing compounds 1 and 2, respectively.While the performance of complete solar cells is given by a balance between several factors, we try here to obtain some insights on the impact of molecular design. | What material has Voc of 0.78V? | 35211 |
{
"answer_start": [
85
],
"text": [
"7–8"
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.01.010 | To validate our semi-transparent DSSC photo-anode we choose a TiO2 film thickness of 7–8 µm, obtained with a simple single step printing and considered a good compromise between efficiency and transparency, and neither acid post-treatment (e.g. | What is anode? | 12557 |
{
"answer_start": [
122
],
"text": [
"18.26mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.078 | After adding 1wt.% CuS, the PSCs yielded to the best power conversion efficiency of 11.28% with a VOC of 0.98V and JSC of 18.26mAcm−2, while the pure carbon electrode based PSCs attained the best power conversion efficiency of 9.36% with a VOC of 0.93V and JSC of 16.14mAcm−2 which is slightly higher than that of the PSCs based on pure carbon counter electrode. | What is the value of JSC? | 7168 |
{
"answer_start": [
104
],
"text": [
"723mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.10.022 | Obviously, the DSSC sensitized by DT4 exhibits the best η of 8.05%, with a Jsc of 16.35mAcm−2, a Voc of 723mV, and FF of 0.68. | What is the value of Voc? | 9417 |
{
"answer_start": [
100
],
"text": [
"3.53%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.026 | It can be seen from that the PCE of the DSSC without the microsphere light scatting layer was just 3.53% whilst that for DSSC with microsphere light scatting layer but without graphene was 4.95%. | What is the value of PCE? | 24639 |
{
"answer_start": [
102
],
"text": [
"0.66 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA14876A | Under AM 1.5G illumination, the best sensitizer showed performance data of JSC = 18.11 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.66 V, FF = 0.729 and η = 8.72%, and a good cell stability at 60 °C for 1000 hours, being only decreased by ∼5% in the η value.The future prospect of a low-carbon society requires emerging renewable energy sources, among which dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) are considered to be one competitive candidate. | What is the value of VOC? | 17072 |
{
"answer_start": [
0
],
"text": [
"0.70 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.11.016 | shows the respective measured values of the various CEs | What is the value of Voc? | 38020 |
{
"answer_start": [
219
],
"text": [
"11.0%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.026 | In accordance with the morphologies, the average power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 1,2-dichlorobenzene-processed PSCs was 17.5%, which was higher than those of chlorobenzene- and chloroform-processed PSCs (16.7% and 11.0%, respectively) The best-performing cell was fabricated using 1,2-dichlorobenzene, showing PCEs of 17.9% and 18.2% in forward and reverse scans, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 16016 |
{
"answer_start": [
106
],
"text": [
"12.88%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC01570H | Consequently, the average PCE of the DMSO-added PSCs was significantly improved to 16.59% (original PCE = 12.88%), which was mainly caused by the enhancement in the short-circuit current density (Jsc, from 20.90 to 22.31 mA cm−2) and the fill factor (FF, from 0.63 to 0.75). | What is the value of PCE? | 1340 |
{
"answer_start": [
46
],
"text": [
"0.96cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.007 | The active area of the as-fabricated PSCs was 0.96cm2.The morphology of as-prepared (MA)x(FA)1-xPbI3 film was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, Zeiss Supa 50VP, Germany). | What is the value of active area? | 32553 |
{
"answer_start": [
58
],
"text": [
"8.43%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.01.035 | The results showed that IA-1 exhibited the highest PCE of 8.43% when co-sensitized with MH-13 compared to PCE of 8.22% for MH-13 as single photosensitizer. | What is the value of PCE? | 17366 |
{
"answer_start": [
170
],
"text": [
"5.29%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.09.014 | These results indicate that FF values could be affected by the shape of photosensitizer.D1, SH-11, SH-12, SH-13, SH-14, and N719 dyes' η values were 5.51%, 5.57%, 3.85%, 5.29%, 6.01%, and 7.59%, respectively, under AM 1.5G irradiation (100mWcm−2) (). | What is the value of η? | 23612 |
{
"answer_start": [
169
],
"text": [
"1.10V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.159 | The two TNRAs based PSCs had the similar short-circuit current density (Jsc), e.g., 20.9mAcm−2 and 19.7mAcm−2, but different open-circuit voltage (Voc), e.g., 0.96V and 1.10V, which resulted in a higher PCE of 16.57% from PbI2/DMF+DMSO+HAc solution than from PbI2/DMSO+ACN solution (13.35%). | What is the value of Voc? | 30608 |
{
"answer_start": [
0
],
"text": [
"0.65 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP03312D | 6a shows the J–V curve of DSCs with CZTS I, CZTS II and Pt film used as the CEs and the device parameters are given in Table 2 | What is the value of VOC? | 37948 |
{
"answer_start": [
256
],
"text": [
"0.36 V"
]
} | 10.1039/B512983D | The highest incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of 19% at 495 nm and the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 0.18% under AM 1.5 (100 mW cm−2) with a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 1.32 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.36 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.38 have been achieved with 1 ∶ 4 ratio of P3HT∶N,N′-di(1-nonadecyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-bis(dicarboximide) (PDI-C9) after annealing at 80 °C for 1 h. | What is the value of VOC? | 33272 |
{
"answer_start": [
28
],
"text": [
"FTO"
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00100B | The LPAH deposited onto the FTO substrate and was sintered at 400 °C for 20 min.The Cs2SnI6 powder was first prepared from oxidized fresh B-γ CsSnI3 powder. | What is substrate? | 33891 |
{
"answer_start": [
87
],
"text": [
"1.03V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.12.030 | AZO:O3/CH3NH3PbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Au devices show champion JSC, VOC and η of 20.92mA/cm2, 1.03V and 10.5% respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 34184 |
{
"answer_start": [
143
],
"text": [
"21.61 mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.024 | By adding 3.8 wt% of Au NRs into the photoactive layer, a PCE of 15.86% (4.6% enhancement) was achieved, with corresponding Jsc, Voc and FF of 21.61 mA/cm2, 1.00 V and 0.735, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 4598 |
{
"answer_start": [
130
],
"text": [
"0.641V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.071 | As seen in the data, the N3 based device co-sensitized with 0.2mM of dye A1 carrying barbituric acid showed improved VOC value of 0.641V than 0.618V of N3 sensitized device. | What is the value of VOC? | 6411 |
{
"answer_start": [
161
],
"text": [
"CoWO4"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.054 | The MWO4/BC used as CEs in DSSCs exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activity for I3− reduction and fast electron transport capability (Rct values of FeWO4/BC, CoWO4/BC, and NiWO4/BC were reduced from 12.00Ωcm2, 27.41Ωcm2, and 11.27Ωcm2 for FeWO4, CoWO4, and NiWO4 to 8.50Ωcm2, 8.07Ωcm2, and 2.17Ωcm2, respectively) owing to the synergistic effects of catalytic MWO4 and conductive BC. | What material has Rct of 27.41Ωcm2? | 36082 |
{
"answer_start": [
60
],
"text": [
"15.1%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.025 | Consequently, the PCE increased by ~45%, i.e., from ~10 to ~15.1% using GO as dual function buffer layer in mesoscopic PSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 26049 |
{
"answer_start": [
62
],
"text": [
"1.40 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA08900K | The pristine CsPbBr3-based PSC achieved a PCE of 7.29% (Voc = 1.40 V, Jsc = 6.84 mA cm−2, FF = 76.1%), and the PCE significantly improved to 9.06% using CsPb0.97Tb0.03Br3 as the light harvester; other parameters also elevated. | What is the value of Voc? | 30180 |
{
"answer_start": [
68
],
"text": [
"48.2%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.081 | The Jsc of such device is 4.37 × 10−4 mA·cm−2, Voc is 0.37 V, FF is 48.2%. | What is the value of FF? | 7581 |
{
"answer_start": [
28
],
"text": [
"Co-Ni-MoSx"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.067 | As expected, the quaternary Co-Ni-MoSx YSNs showed a PCE of 9.76% in DSSC, which was much larger than that of Pt (8.24%) at the same conditions. | What material has PCE of 9.76%? | 37614 |
{
"answer_start": [
78
],
"text": [
"21.31mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.08.039 | The PSCs based on the TiO2 modified by PC61BM showed a Voc of 0.99V, a Jsc of 21.31mA/cm2, an FF of 0.69, and an overall PCE of 14.56%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 6942 |
{
"answer_start": [
241
],
"text": [
"0.71 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA08728G | This is not surprising, considering the extensive planar, aromatic surface area and substantial hydrophobicity of the dye SM63.Increasing the CDCA concentration tenfold (2 mM), afforded a significant improvements JSC (12.6 mA cm−2) and VOC (0.71 V) with a slightly longer (1 hour) sensitization time to achieve a PCE of 5.90% (Fig. | What is the value of VOC? | 812 |
{
"answer_start": [
100
],
"text": [
"779mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.12.031 | It could be seen that the Pt CE based DSSCs had a PCE of 7.56%, where Jsc was 14.90 mAcm−2, Voc was 779mV, and FF was 0.65; while the PCE of the synthesized PEDOT CE based device was only 6.77%, where Jsc was 13.79mAcm−2, Voc was 775 mV, FF was 0.63. | What is the value of Voc? | 20020 |
{
"answer_start": [
320
],
"text": [
"0.71 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C6NR07185F | In a word, the larger surface area for dye-loading would have better light utilization, which leads to the increased JSC and efficiency values of the BTP film-based solar cells.It is worthwhile to note that the BTP film-based solar cell displays slightly lower VOC values (0.69 V) as compared to the BTN film-based one (0.71 V) though these photoanodes have a similar thickness. | What is the value of VOC? | 13154 |
{
"answer_start": [
16
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA01995D | The photoanode (TiO2) was used as the working electrode and the Pt counter electrode (CE) was used as both the auxiliary electrode and the reference electrode. | What is photoanode? | 22642 |
{
"answer_start": [
42
],
"text": [
"6.97%"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA13217J | The PCE of the gel DSCs can be as high as 6.97%, quite close to that of liquid ACN-MPN DSCs, whereas the gel DSCs have much better photovoltaic stability than the liquid DSCs.This research work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore (R-284-000-106-112). | What is the value of PCE? | 21744 |
{
"answer_start": [
265
],
"text": [
"100 mWcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110522 | The twisting angles of the film with size of 10×1 cm2 are 0˜1800° (5 circles) by using a twisting device.The photocurrent density–voltage (J–V) characteristic of the photovoltaic textile was recorded on a computerized digital sourcemeter (Keithley, 2400-SCS) under 100 mWcm−2 illumination. | What is the value of illumination? | 4084 |
{
"answer_start": [
118
],
"text": [
"8.75%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.07.029 | The resulting photovoltaic conversion efficiency of In2.77S4@Cc CE is 8.71%, which is very close to that of Pt CE (η= 8.75%). | What is the value of η? | 13426 |
{
"answer_start": [
99
],
"text": [
"22.01mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.036 | GuaI treatment has no effect on the short-circuit current (Jsc), achieving 22.46mA/cm2 compared to 22.01mA/cm2 for the pure MAPbI3 device, the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and Fill factor (FF) are enhanced distinctly with the introduction of GuaI. | What is the value of Jsc? | 10008 |
{
"answer_start": [
125
],
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.029 | The current−voltage (J−V) characteristics of all devices were measured by using a Keithley 4200 under the light intensity of 100mW/cm2. | What is the value of light intensity of? | 19776 |
{
"answer_start": [
120
],
"text": [
"8.41mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.02.012 | The DYE1- and DYE2-based devices made with the 7μm-thick layer exhibited a short-circuit photocurrent (Jsc) of 7.38 and 8.41mAcm−2, open circuit voltages (Voc) of 0.723 and 0.715V and fill factors (ff) of 0.69 and 0.68, respectively, resulting in an efficiency (η) of 3.68% and 4.09%, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 6009 |
{
"answer_start": [
50
],
"text": [
"4.05%"
]
} | 10.1039/C004372A | The conversion efficiency (η) also increased from 4.05% to 4.96% under 100 mW cm−2. | What is the value of η? | 17955 |
{
"answer_start": [
73
],
"text": [
"0.04 cm2"
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA18729C | The active area of device prepared under cross masks was estimated to be 0.04 cm2.Surface morphology of the perovskite films were investigated using Zeiss field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). | What is the value of active area? | 26566 |
{
"answer_start": [
72
],
"text": [
"BTT(DPP-Th)3-EH"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.12.034 | Our experimental findings suggest that nanofibril kind of morphology of BTT(DPP-Th)3-EH could improve the charge carrier mobility of the HTMs and enhance the device performance, which opens up the scope of the low band gap star shaped materials as hole transporting materials in PSCs.Supplementary data to this article can be found online at | What is HTMs? | 8946 |
{
"answer_start": [
74
],
"text": [
"7.35 mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.081 | First, the DSC-1, derived from method I, exhibited η of 3.05% with Jsc of 7.35 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.632 V, and FF of 65.75%, revealing no appreciable enhancement of PV property compared to the cell derived from the single TA-St-CA/TiO2-RT. | What is the value of Jsc? | 9198 |
{
"answer_start": [
178
],
"text": [
"696 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C6SC03938C | Consequently, through rational molecular engineering, the optimal sensitizer, WS-69, realized the highest PCE of 9.03%, with the average parameters of JSC = 19.39 mA cm−2, VOC = 696 mV and FF = 0.67, outperforming the reference dye, WS-66(7.01%), as a result of broadening absorption and improving the near-infrared light-harvesting.The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiencies (IPCE) spectra, a function confirming the variation in JSC for DSSCs, are shown in Fig. | What is the value of VOC? | 8571 |
{
"answer_start": [
49
],
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.003 | A xenon lamp coupled with AM 1.5 optical filter (100 mW/cm2) was used as light source for illumination. | What is the value of illumination? | 12433 |
{
"answer_start": [
170
],
"text": [
"61.93%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.242 | In contrast to the NP/NF, the device fabricated with NP/NF/ZrO2 performed significantly better, which exhibited Voc of 0.774V, Jsc of 14.03mAcm−2, PCE of 6.72% and FF of 61.93%. | What is the value of FF? | 27704 |
{
"answer_start": [
143
],
"text": [
"2.2mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.12.064 | The discrepancy of Jsc for CB processed OSCs are tiny from 5.6mA/cm2 to 7.0mA/cm2, which can make a comparison to the CF processed device from 2.2mA/cm2 to 7.1mA/cm2. | What is the value of Jsc? | 4423 |
{
"answer_start": [
13
],
"text": [
"silver"
]
} | 10.1039/C8ME00031J | 110 nm thick silver electrodes were thermally evaporated at 1 × 10−6 mbar through a shadow mask to create solar cells with a total active area of 0.0919 cm2, as defined by the overlap between FTO and silver.The current density–voltage (J–V) curves were measured (2400 Series SourceMeter, Keithley Instruments) in ambient conditions under simulated AM1.5 sunlight at (100 mW cm−2) irradiance generated by an Abet Class AAB sun 2000 simulator, with the intensity calibrated with an NREL calibrated KG5 filtered Si reference cell. | What material has active area of 0.0919 cm2? | 37363 |
{
"answer_start": [
112
],
"text": [
"16.24%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA09824C | MgO modification elevated the average PCE from 13.38% for the PSCs prepared at 0.4 M TBT without MgO coating to 16.24% for the PSCs formed at the same TBT concentration with MgO coating, exhibiting an approximately 18% improvement in PV performance. | What is the value of PCE? | 22791 |
{
"answer_start": [
78
],
"text": [
"CsPbIBr2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.049 | For CsXth in perovskite solution, 2.5%, 5% and 10% M/M CsXth was dissolved in CsPbIBr2 precursor respectively. | What is perovskite? | 31664 |
{
"answer_start": [
159
],
"text": [
"564mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2015.04.089 | The DSSCs sensitized with the dyes 6a and 6b have exhibited relatively high η values 1.31% (JSC=3.96mAcm−2, VOC=516mV, ff=0.64) and 1.97% (JSC=5.65mAcm−2, VOC=564mV, ff=0.62), respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 22006 |
{
"answer_start": [
91
],
"text": [
"15.52%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jssc.2019.04.022 | As to the device with 5% Y-doped TiO2 compact layers, the champion cell presented a PCE of 15.52% with Jsc of 21.20mAcm−2, Voc of 1.00V, and FF of 73.22%, and the average PCE of 14.77±2.18% with Jsc of 20.97±1.19mAcm−2, Voc of 1.00±0.01V, and FF of 70.12±7.09%. | What is the value of PCE? | 33075 |
{
"answer_start": [
39
],
"text": [
"1 cm2"
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00406E | For the thin film devices the area was 1 cm2 while for the optimized thick film DSSC the active area was 0.16 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 33856 |
{
"answer_start": [
19
],
"text": [
"15.65%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.03.041 | The highest PCE is 15.65%. | What is the value of PCE? | 24531 |
{
"answer_start": [
139
],
"text": [
"0.835V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apt.2018.12.010 | For the TiO2 NTs photoanode (Cell-NTs), Jsc remarkably increases to 10.48mAcm−2 and FF slightly risens to 68.12%, whereas Voc decreases to 0.835V, hence, the PCE raises to 5.96%. | What is the value of Voc? | 29749 |
{
"answer_start": [
53
],
"text": [
"5.6%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP00264A | This was followed up by further improving the PCE to 5.6% by decreasing the recombination. | What is the value of PCE? | 11088 |
{
"answer_start": [
54
],
"text": [
"FTO"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.086 | pristine SnO2 and SnO2–CaCO3 (1L, 6L, and 12L) on the FTO substrate were identified to demonstrate the surface change. | What is substrate? | 28801 |
{
"answer_start": [
78
],
"text": [
"0.09 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.027 | The solar cells were masked with a black aperture to define an active area of 0.09 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 28278 |
{
"answer_start": [
169
],
"text": [
"16.20mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.07.041 | Especially when the ratio of diethyl ether reaches 4%, as listed in , the short-circuit current density (JSC) of Device C increases to 19.47mA/cm2, which is higher than 16.20mA/cm2 of Device A by 20%. | What is the value of JSC? | 4880 |
{
"answer_start": [
148
],
"text": [
"30–60"
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2014.07.028 | The X-ray diffraction pattern shows that synthesized ZnO nanocrystals are of hexagonal structure and the grain size was found to be in the range of 30–60 nm. | What is ZnO? | 9321 |
{
"answer_start": [
66
],
"text": [
"10.35mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.001 | Under similar measuring conditions, SP and Z4 showed Jsc of 9.01, 10.35mAcm−2; Voc of 758, 802mV and FF of 0.71, 0.69, corresponding to η of 4.87% and 5.73%, respectively The Jsc values of the DSSCs based on TLEP-1 and TLEP-2 are well in agreement with their UV–Vis absorption spectra (). | What is the value of Jsc? | 31173 |
{
"answer_start": [
98
],
"text": [
"2.55%"
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00368A | TT7 sensitized cell gave a lower JSC of 5.88 mA cm−2 and a VOC of 587 mV, corresponding to a η of 2.55%. | What is the value of η? | 32181 |
{
"answer_start": [
29
],
"text": [
"62.1%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR04739H | With the fill factor (FF) of 62.1%, the best PCE was calculated as 9.6%. | What is the value of FF? | 22815 |
{
"answer_start": [
72
],
"text": [
"0.804 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.04.002 | It is noticed that VOC of 0.781 V for the (D-PTZ-A)-sensitized DSSC and 0.804 V for the (D-PTZ1–PTZ2-A)-sensitized DSSC are higher than that for the N719-sensitized one (0.775 V) at the given 4.8-μm thick TiO2 film. | What is the value of VOC? | 5499 |
{
"answer_start": [
25
],
"text": [
"7.36%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.125 | With 2 M N-dopant DSCs η=7.36% compared to η=4.75% for DSCs with no dopant. | What is the value of η? | 26519 |
{
"answer_start": [
49
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.11.006 | In comparison, PCE, Jsc, Voc and FF of DSSC with Pt CE are 7.08%, 13.81 mA·cm−2, 0.76 V, and 67.45%, in the order given. | What material has Voc of 0.76 V? | 37300 |
{
"answer_start": [
85
],
"text": [
"4.47%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.02.018 | The η values of the C1-1, C1-5 and C2-1 sensitized solar cells are 2.93%, 1.19%, and 4.47%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 25036 |
{
"answer_start": [
60
],
"text": [
"0.80 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.02.018 | The water-added DSSC with derivative (a) renders the VOC of 0.80 V, JSC 5.75 mA cm−2, FF 0.64, and η 2.96. | What is the value of VOC? | 9232 |
{
"answer_start": [
189
],
"text": [
"1.65%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA27211H | The photoelectric conversion efficiencies (η) of PVWs based on 0 h (PVW-0), 3.5 h (PVW-3.5), 8.5 h (PVW-8.5), 13.5 h (PVW-13.5), 20 h (PVW-20), and 25 h of anodization (PVW-25) were 3.63%, 1.65%, 1.71%, 2.50%, 2.71%, and 2.64%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 30315 |
{
"answer_start": [
45
],
"text": [
"CZ-0"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.036 | As shown in , the charge transfer process at CZ-0 CE/electrolyte interface is extremely slow, leading to a high Rct of 8890 Ω. | What material has Rct of 8890 Ω? | 36779 |
{
"answer_start": [
226
],
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226765 | All the J–V curves of the fabricated perovskite solar cells were measured by a solar simulator (Polaronix K201; McScience) and via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plots under an AM 1.5 standard condition (100mW/cm2, 25°C). | What is the value of solar? | 6170 |
{
"answer_start": [
160
],
"text": [
"14.20 mA·cm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.05.014 | It is found that the DSSC assembled with pure LCMO nanoparticles shows an power conversion efficiency of 6.46%, the short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 14.20 mA·cm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.770 V and fill factor (FF) of 59.16%, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 27579 |
{
"answer_start": [
160
],
"text": [
"64.5%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR06240J | For two-step synthesized CH3NH3PbI3, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.89 V, a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 22.57 mA cm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 64.5%, corresponding to a PCE of 12.95% for the device with a TIPD buffer layer were achieved, which is among the best performances reported in the literature for CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM-based PHJ perovskite solar cells.Three-dimensional organometal halide perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 is an ideal light harvesting absorber for solar cells due to its unique features such as low exciton binding energy and a large Bohr exciton radius with large dielectric constants, balanced charge mobility with a long diffuse length, and a direct optical bandgap of around 1.5 eV with a high extinction coefficient. | What is the value of FF? | 14057 |
{
"answer_start": [
49
],
"text": [
"9.12mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.198 | The device 4 and 5 present Jsc of 9.48mA/cm2 and 9.12mA/cm2 respectively, which displays a small reduction comparing with device 3. | What is the value of Jsc? | 16114 |
{
"answer_start": [
129
],
"text": [
"76.6%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.02.011 | For reverse scanning (from Voc to Jsc), the PSC exhibited a PCE of 12.9%, with a slightly higher Voc of 0.96V and a higher FF of 76.6%, while Jsc remained almost the same (17.5mA/cm2). | What is the value of FF? | 20144 |
{
"answer_start": [
69
],
"text": [
"16.18%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10470C | With this architecture, the optimized PSC achieved a champion PCE of 16.18% with a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 21.64 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.02 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 73.3% under reverse scanning. | What is the value of PCE? | 24332 |
{
"answer_start": [
193
],
"text": [
"12.3mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.01.035 | Among sensitizers IA 1-4, the highly efficient IA-1 carrying strong cyanoacetic acid moiety showed the higher energy conversion efficiency of 5.92%, highest IPCE response of 61.5%, best JSC of 12.3mAcm−2 and superior VOC 0.68V. | What is the value of JSC? | 21465 |
{
"answer_start": [
264
],
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.11.008 | The drilled holes were sealed with a microscope cover slide and Surlyn to avoid leakage of the electrolyte solution.Solar simulator device (Model: CT80AAA, PET Photo Emission Tech., Inc., USA) consisting of 300 W xenon light source was used to give 1 sun AM 1.5G (100 mW/cm2), over the surface of the test cell. | What is the value of Solar? | 7279 |
{
"answer_start": [
146
],
"text": [
"5.01%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.04.027 | With the integrated benefits of complementary multicomponents having optimized nanoarray structure and doping concentration, the efficiency of η= 5.01% under AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2) was achieved in MEH-PPV/ZCS-NA multicomponent solar cells (We mainly studied the correlation between nanostructural characteristics and photovoltaic performance in HPSCs by using polymer/nanoarray devices. | What is the value of η? | 32247 |
{
"answer_start": [
263
],
"text": [
"76.16%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051 | When the Y/Ti molar ratios in the hydrothermal grown solutions increased from 0% to 3%, the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF) and PCE increased from 21.66mAcm−2, 1.04V, 72.97% and 16.42% to 22.50mAcm−2, 1.06V, 76.16% and 18.11%. | What is the value of FF? | 15291 |
{
"answer_start": [
365
],
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.05.044 | The optical absorption spectra show high absorbance over the entire visible spectrum as expected.a shows the current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the devices with the HTM layer consisting of PEDOT:PSS and different doping amounts of GO (300μL, 500μL, 700μL, and 1000 μL/1mL PEDOT:PSS) under standard AM1.5G illumination with an irradiation intensity of 100mW/cm2. | What is the value of illumination? | 17772 |
{
"answer_start": [
95
],
"text": [
"20.2mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.12.012 | The optimized PSC based on non-doped ZnO NRs presents a PCE of 7.99%, a VOC of 0.77V, a JSC of 20.2mA/cm2, and a FF of 51%. | What is the value of JSC? | 17042 |
{
"answer_start": [
108
],
"text": [
"4.97%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.09.015 | The devices sensitized by dyes with thiophene and benzene as π-linker possessed relative lower η, 5.92% and 4.97%, respectively.► Synthesis of three new dendritic triphenylamine derivatives for dye-sensitized solar cells. | What is the value of η? | 7854 |
{
"answer_start": [
196
],
"text": [
"2.21%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA06849E | The addition of TBP into the electrolyte leads to an 36% increase in Voc and an 14% improvement in Jsc, that are responsible for the obtained efficiency enhancement (from 1.51% (electrolyte A) to 2.21% (with electrolyte B)).Addition of TBP leads to an 46% increase in η compared to blank cell. | What is the value of η? | 10277 |
{
"answer_start": [
163
],
"text": [
"0.60 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.020 | The highest solar conversion efficiency of 4.85% was also obtained with 0.01 g of SiO2 nanofiber filler, correlating to the highest Jsc of 13.63 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.60 V, and a fill factor of 59.54%. | What is the value of Voc? | 14377 |
{
"answer_start": [
541
],
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.140 | Most of the DSSCs reported consists of platinum (Pt) nanoparticles based CEs and currently Pt is regarded as the benchmark CE catalyst as it could exhibit high catalytic activity and stability In this work, a non-Pt catalyst based on Mn, C and N (MnNx/C) was synthesized via the high-pressure pyrolysis Platinum paste (PT1), Titania (TiO2) paste (18NR-T), hot melt sealing agent (MS004610-10, 30 mm thick thermoplastic film), Fluorine-doped SnO2 (FTO) conducting glass (MS001695-10), and high performance electrolyte (EL-HPE, which contains I3−/I− redox couple in mixture of acetonitrile and valeronitrile solvents with pyridine derivative additives) were purchased from Dyesol Ltd., Australia. | What is redox couple? | 16876 |
{
"answer_start": [
74
],
"text": [
"8.18%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | DSSCs using these carbon-based hybrid CEs presented PCEs of 8.41%, 8.34%, 8.18%, 8.09%, 7.93%, 7.76%, 7.75%, 7.69%, and 7.63% respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 7223 |
{
"answer_start": [
83
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM16896K | Overall, under standard global AM 1.5 solar conditions, the cell based on the N, B–TiO2-2 electrode shows a higher overall efficiency of 6.2% (active area: 4.0 cm2) with a higher open-circuit voltage of 0.733 V and an increased Jsc value (up to 14.0 mA cm−2), which leads to the superior energy-conversion efficiency of the N, B codoped DSC, which is about 10.7% higher than that of the undoped DSC. | What material has active area of 4.0 cm2? | 37332 |
{
"answer_start": [
107
],
"text": [
"0.70V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.063 | The individually N719 sensitized device was found to exhibit η value of 5.31% (with Jsc=11.98 mA cm−2, Voc=0.70V, and FF=0.63), the individually L1, L2 and L3 sensitized device exhibited η value of 1.34% (with Jsc=3.80 mA cm−2, Voc=0.58V, and FF=0.61), 1.44% (with Jsc=4.16 mA cm−2, Voc=0.59V, and FF=0.59) and 1.10% (with Jsc=3.22 mA cm−2, Voc=0.58V, and FF=0.59), respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 10529 |
{
"answer_start": [
176
],
"text": [
"9.11%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.02.026 | The solar cell sensitized by RC-31, with strong electron-donating N,N-diethyl-aniline-substituted ancillary ligand, exhibited a JSC of 17.75mAcm−2, a VOC of 0.693V, and a η of 9.11%. | What is the value of η? | 8053 |
{
"answer_start": [
88
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.05.016 | In conclusion the PITN/graphene (1:4) CE can be used as a cost-effective replacement to Pt in DSSCs. | What is CE? | 15381 |
{
"answer_start": [
286
],
"text": [
"8.38%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.046 | Due to the bilayer structure is only in possession of the small specific surface area caused by the large pores and vacant space between 1-D TNTs, after being introduced TNPs as the third layer, device DSSCs-TNPs/TNTs/TNPs shows the higher JSC of 15.23 mA cm–2 and an efficiency (η) of 8.38%. | What is the value of η? | 22465 |
Subsets and Splits