argument
stringlengths
35
251
topic
stringlengths
21
52
example
stringlengths
37
230
vocational education should be subsidized as it is vital that we have skilled trades people and being trained in an actual work environment is highly beneficial for developing these skills.
We should subsidize vocational education
there is a lack of qualified tradesmen in today's marketplace and subsidizing vocational education could help to get more people interested in these fields
vocational education should be subsidized as it prepares people for the labor market.
We should subsidize vocational education
there is a lack of qualified tradesmen in today's marketplace and subsidizing vocational education could help to get more people interested in these fields
vocational education should be subsidized as it will allow people to get the training required for new jobs.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education should be subsidized as the majority of those studying would be from lower income families.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education should be subsidized because all students don't necessarily need a college education and rack up lots of debt in four year colleges.
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
vocational education should be subsidized because currently the system is biased towards more academic subjects leading to shortages in many essential skills
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education should be subsidized because it helps to manage education
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
vocational education should be subsidized to allow a skilled workforce to develop and grow.
We should subsidize vocational education
there is a lack of qualified tradesmen in today's marketplace and subsidizing vocational education could help to get more people interested in these fields
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
We should subsidize vocational education
there is a lack of qualified tradesmen in today's marketplace and subsidizing vocational education could help to get more people interested in these fields
Vocational education should be the future for most youth.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education should be treated as an alternative to college and as traditional college is not subsidized neither should vocational educational pathways .
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education should not be subsided because everyone who wants to go college should be given the opportunity to do so. most colleges are not subsidized.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education should not be subsidized as it is no more important than any other type of education in preparing a workforce for modern society. employers should provide the training to their employees.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education should not be subsidized as it should be the responsibility of the employer to train the industries future
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
vocational education should not be subsidized as it would place extra strain on the education budget.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
vocational education should not be subsidized as private companies can abuse this system by using public money without ensuring trainees are properly trained.
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to allow a skilled workforce to develop and grow.
vocational education should not be subsidized because it does not boost the demand for training
We should subsidize vocational education
there is a shortage of people working in the vocational fields and subsidizing them could do away with the shortage.
vocational education should not be subsidized because it does not prepare people for the job market like graduates.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
vocational education should not be subsidized because the company should provide the funding as the person is working for them, and the money could be better spent on a formal education.
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
vocational education should not be subsidized because the money would be better spent on increasing the salaries of those who have completed their education.
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to allow a skilled workforce to develop and grow.
vocational education should not be subsidized because the students don't get a classical education and are thus not well rounded upon earning their degree.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
vocational education should not be subsidized people should fund themselves
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
vocational education should pay for itself and would be less taxing on others
We should subsidize vocational education
subsidies for vocational education would help solve the problem of skills shortages in many trades
vocational education shouldn't be subsidized because it takes a lot of money out of people's pockets
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to allow a skilled workforce to develop and grow.
vocational education takes away the responsibility of employers to train and employ their staff
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education provides valuable, lifelong skills that can be monetised and help with a flourishing economy.
vocational education teaches people a trade
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education teaches skills that will be eternally needed
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational education trains people for low paying, dead end jobs
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational education trains people with the types of skills that are becoming obsolete due to robotics and ai
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational education usually leads to highly paid jobs. therefore the state should not be funding this.
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education is a vital component that creates educated workers in areas that are required in communities and the government should subsidize these areas to ensure its continuity.
vocational education will be too expensive and costly.
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education is essential to fill gaps in society for example where there is a lack of builders, plumbers and other tradesmen.
vocational education would enable people who do not wish to go to college obtain a career and be independent in life.
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational jobs play a vital role in society, but not as many students are pursuing these careers. subsidizing vocational education allows schools to still afford to offer these courses.
We should subsidize vocational education
there is a lack of qualified tradesmen in today's marketplace and subsidizing vocational education could help to get more people interested in these fields
vocational jobs are at a big risk of being robot driven
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational jobs tend to lead to well paid jobs so subsidizing the training is unnecessary.
We should subsidize vocational education
there is a shortage of people working in the vocational fields and subsidizing them could do away with the shortage.
Vocational schools are a more efficient form of secondary education as they skip the traditional liberal arts and general education courses of most universities, and instead focus on practical courses for a person's career.
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
Vocational schools help ensure that individuals will have the basic skills required to become a productive member of the labor force.
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational schools offer an excellent chance to develop some vital skills and careers in hands-on fields which don’t' require traditional four-year academic training.
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
Vocational schools teach students - in a relatively short amount of time - professions that have high earning potential. In two years or less, graduates can already be working and making money.
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational skills such as hairdressing and baking should not be supported by public funds. if students want to learn these future careers they should pay for this education just as those going to college.
We should subsidize vocational education
subsidizing vocational education is a must. there will always be a need for people to fix things, and teaching your child a skill is setting them up for future success.
vocational studies are often overlooked in favour of more traditional studies leading to a shortage of people to work in vocational occupations that are essential.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational studies should not be subsidised taking funding away from other areas that are more deserving.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational training is cheaper than college and often results in high paying jobs, so they can easily pay for their education after graduating.
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational training is necessary for people who are unemployed to give them a chance at a new career
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
vocational training prepares those that prefer blue collar jobs over white collar/college degreed jobs
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
vocational training provides skills that are vital to our labor market and society. like any other form of education it enables students to learn skills, to become a productive part of society. support it!
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
voter apathy is the enemy of democracy, for a representative vote we must encourage voting as efficiently as we can
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
voter turnout these days are dropping steadily so we need to make everyone vote to show the true representation of the people
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
voters are already confused enough with traditional two party systems.
We should adopt a multi-party system
a multi-party system would help create more options for voters.
voting and not voting is an exercise of freedom of expression and speech, therefore protected. creating laws forcing voting violates the rights of individuals.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is a choice and forcing a person to do so when they do not really like who is running defeats the whole purpose.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is a matter of choice and should not be forced.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is a personal choice and should not be mandated
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is a privilege and a choice. if a person does not like any of the people running then there is no point in voting.
We should introduce compulsory voting
each person has the right to decide if they want to vote or not. forcing people to do something is the exact opposite of what this country is supposed to be about.
voting is a privilege, but not something that should be forced. if someone doesn’t like either candidate why should they be forced to choose?
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is a responsibility and should be mandatory.
We should introduce compulsory voting
Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.
voting is a right, a privilege but a person should not be forced to vote, especially if there is not a candidate that a person agrees with in regards to their views.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is a right, but rights should not be forced on those who do not desire them.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
Voting is a right, but we should also have a right not to vote. If no party truly reflects are views we should not be forced to vote for just the least bad option
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is a right, not a law. no one should be forced to vote if they don't want to
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is an important part of making democracy work, and should be mandatory.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting is so important. voter turnout would be much higher if compulsory voting was introduced.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that our leaders reflect the will of all people, not just those who were able/motivated enough to make it to the polls.
voting is such an important part of being part of society and its decision making process that it should be compulsory.
We should introduce compulsory voting
Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.
voting is what drives our country and not voting means that the most preferred people do not get elected.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting must be recognized as a value and the moral benefit for us and our kids future. and any absence from voting should be penalties.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting should be a choice for every person
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting should be a option for adults and making people to have to vote is out of mind and has no connection to democracy and to our style of life.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
voting should not be enforced as some candidates and prospective legislation may not be aligned to a voters views and would infringe on the views and rights of citizens.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
vow of celibacy is important for some religious members and should be allowed to remain.
The vow of celibacy should be abandoned
we should not abandon the vow of celibacy because it is a centuries old custom that is seen as sacred and holy.
vow of celibacy is no longer relevant in the modern era and should be abolished.
The vow of celibacy should be abandoned
the vow of celibacy is important to some people and to some faiths; it should be a personal decision not something that is simply abandoned entirely.
vow of celibacy is not fair to put on any human being because everyone has sexual urges which means the priests can commit evil acts of sex on minors. it should be abandoned.
The vow of celibacy should be abandoned
celibacy is an unnatural state for humans and should be abandoned by the church and others. it leads to negative behaviors based on the attempt to suppress a normal human urge to procreate.
vow of celibacy should be abandoned because its creepy to have these people denying themselves which turns into desperation and creepy behavior
The vow of celibacy should be abandoned
the vow of celibacy is important to some people and to some faiths; it should be a personal decision not something that is simply abandoned entirely.
vowing to be celibate doesn't ensure that someone will keep that vow because he or she are the only ones who will know that it has been kept
The vow of celibacy should be abandoned
the vow of celibacy is important to some people and to some faiths; it should be a personal decision not something that is simply abandoned entirely.
vows of celibacy are a way of expressing devotion and channelling ones thoughts away from desire into worship.
The vow of celibacy should be abandoned
the vow of celibacy is important to some people and to some faiths; it should be a personal decision not something that is simply abandoned entirely.
vows of celibacy are an archaic remnant of an older way of thinking and for the sake of bringing religious leaders closer to understanding the lives of normal people, should be left behind
The vow of celibacy should be abandoned
the vow of celibacy is important to some people and to some faiths; it should be a personal decision not something that is simply abandoned entirely.
w should not limit executive compensation, by providing attractive executive packages we ensure the best of the best are running the companies that power our economy.
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
wales are endangered and should be protected
We should ban whaling
Whaling is essential to the economic well-being of certain countries.
War between nations is incredibly unlikely due to our current international connectivity and economic interdependence, and thus nuclear weapons are unnecessary.
We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons provide a deterrent for starting a major conflict.
war is too brutal and women are not strong enough both physically and mentally to withstand it
We should prohibit women in combat
Women are just as capable as men in modern warfare so we would lose half of our available fighters by not allowing them.
wars and terrorism have been fueled by religion; perhaps atheism might subside this.
We should adopt atheism
We should adopt atheism because history has shown that the majority of wars and human divisiveness is due to religious differences.
watching television as a family is good bonding time
We should abandon television
television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise.
watching television gives people a distorted view of reality
We should abandon television
Television has become an integral part of our culture that we should cherish. It not only provides great entertainment, but it's also an excellent educational tool and allows us to keep up with the latest news.
watching television is bad for health
We should abandon television
television is a major part of the sedentary lifestyle that is the leading cause of disease in the world.
watching television leads to a sedentary and unhealthy lifestyle
We should abandon television
television is a major part of the sedentary lifestyle that is the leading cause of disease in the world.
we shouldnt abolish the right to bear arms they can be used as a deterrent if someone is protecting their property
We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms
we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings
we absolutely need a multi party system. the two party system is a failure. the entire country can't be split in to only two categories. we need better representation of the people.
We should adopt a multi-party system
we should adopt a multi-party system so that we have more viewpoints to solve problems.
we absolutely should not ban naturopathy because each person has the freedom to choose what to do with their bodies. everyone has the right to try natural remedies like herbs and massage.
We should ban naturopathy
we should ban naturopathy since it has no scientific basis and has no medical benefit beyond the placebo effect.
we accept collectivism because it leads to less conflict due to people thinking as a team instead of one person thinking about themselves and causing trouble
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism encourages all members of a group to contribute to the community's well-being and in turn elevates the standard of living for everyone, eliminating disparity and resentment between unequal groups.
we adhere to these principles and these spaces to guarantee behaviors that make us feel safe, therefore safe spaces should not be abolished
We should abolish safe spaces
safe spaces should be abolished because without proper regulation, they can be just as dangerous as any where else.
we all have free will. nobody forces someone to commit a crime. even if the crime is being done based on law enforcement setting it up. it filters out the bad people from the good in society.
Entrapment should be legalized
through entrapment, people can be persuaded to commit crimes that may not have done otherwise.
we all have the right to eat what we want, to prohibit a specific type of food is an abuse of power
We should ban fast food
fast food is a lucrative business and it is not right to attempt to take someone's livelihood away from them just because some people eat in an unhealthy way too often.
we all have the right to have our beliefs and the fact of a prayer does not change anything
We should prohibit school prayer
school prayer usually supports a specific religion. this discriminates against non-believers or members of different religions.
we all need to feel we have a refuge so it is critically important that we have safe spaces.
We should abolish safe spaces
safe spaces are vital to many, especially on campuses where the students that feel excluded or discriminated against have a safe haven to enable them to feel comfortable in continuing their education
We allow burning and burying of worn out or old flags, it is not clear why it is different if these actions take place in the context of protest.
We should prohibit flag burning
flag burning is an expression of freedom of speech to which people have a right in a democratic country
we allow people to sell their eggs and sperm. we should allow people to sell the use of their penises and vaginas.
We should legalize prostitution
prostitution should be legalized as it provides a service and reduces rape and sex crimes
we already allow multiple forms of non-traditional family structures, so it no longer makes sense to keep polygamy banned.
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy often leads to inequality and oppression for women therefore it should be banned.
We already allow some of our body parts to be sold, such as sperm and eggs, why is that any different from organs?
We should legalize organ trade
allowing organ trade would probably lead to more people donating and helping patients survive. currently there are too many restrictions even for people that would be willing to sell their organs.
we already are in high enough debt, we don't need to make it worse be subsidizing pointless things.
We should subsidize journalism
We should not subsidize journalism because there is already sufficient coverage of major issues from different viewpoints without government action.
we already have a military and private ones are taking away soldiers which are our biggest resource
We should ban private military companies
Private military companies lack oversight and accountability. It is too dangerous to have a military bound to serve who pays it versus the ethical framework of serving the public good.
we already have a multi-party system. people who are dissatisfied with the 2 major parties are free to join another one
We should adopt a multi-party system
we should adopt a multi-party system so that we have more viewpoints to solve problems.