argument
stringlengths
35
251
topic
stringlengths
21
52
example
stringlengths
37
230
we shouldn't legalize organ trade because is important for our intregrity
We should legalize organ trade
We should not legalize the organ trade because it is coercive and preys on ignorance and desperation.
we shouldn't legalize organ trade because it is immoral and it will affect the poorest in society the most. people who have organs removed are more likely to get sick or have future complications.
We should legalize organ trade
We should not legalize the organ trade because it is coercive and preys on ignorance and desperation.
we shouldn't legalize organ trade because it will lower the chance of people donating organs over selling organs
We should legalize organ trade
legalizing the organ trade would bring an end to shortages for transplant
we shouldn't legalize organ trade because some people may not give the ok to be a part of it
We should legalize organ trade
We should not legalize the organ trade because it is coercive and preys on ignorance and desperation.
we shouldn't legalize organ trade because would ruining the existing program of organ donors and people would rather sell their organs than donate them
We should legalize organ trade
we should legalize organ trade because it will lower the risk of selling on the black market and can help those in need
we shouldn't legalize organ trade for insecurity and risk of life
We should legalize organ trade
organ trading is dangerous because it can result in harm to vulnerable people
we shouldn't legalize polygamy beacuse the prosmicuity and prostitution being elevated
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy often leads to inequality and oppression for women therefore it should be banned.
we shouldn't legalize polygamy because it brings shame to monogamous people and their marriages by making it more than ok
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy often leads to inequality and oppression for women therefore it should be banned.
we shouldn't legalize polygamy because it could lead to more abusive relationships
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy often leads to inequality and oppression for women therefore it should be banned.
we shouldn't legalize polygamy because it is immoral for one man to marry more than one woman. the women often get treated poorly and sometimes even coerced into joining the sect.
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy can be a perfectly valid form of union for many people, and legalising it will provide protection and rights for those involved.
we shouldn't legalize polygamy because it often denigrate women and favors men in these marriages. the man often ends up having lots of children which harms the children because they don't get proper attention
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy can be a perfectly valid form of union for many people, and legalising it will provide protection and rights for those involved.
we shouldn't legalize polygamy because it will lead to more abusive relationships
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy often leads to inequality and oppression for women therefore it should be banned.
we shouldn't legalize polygamy because the sociecity is broken off
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy should not be legalized because it empowers men more and minimizes women
we shouldn't legalize polygamy. decriminalize it. allow individuals to cohabitate and be together, but not legal marriage. society and laws are set for 2 person marriage. it is too difficult to change laws.
We should legalize polygamy
polygamy can be a perfectly valid form of union for many people, and legalising it will provide protection and rights for those involved.
we shouldn't legalize prostitution because it may cause higher percentage of drug rates and crimes along with prostitution rates
We should legalize prostitution
prostitution should be legalized as it provides a service and reduces rape and sex crimes
we shouldn't legalize prostitution because it's disgusting for women or men to make a living like that. we have advanced and society no longer accepts sex workers as a legitimate occupation.
We should legalize prostitution
prostitution should be legalized as it provides a service and reduces rape and sex crimes
we shouldn't legalize sex selection because is moral action in society
We should legalize sex selection
we should legalize sex selection because it should be up to people to make that choice. freedom of choice is vital in democracies and should be protected where possible.
we shouldn't legalize sex selection because it is immoral. only god can decide what the sex of the baby will be. if this were legalized, there would be more males than females and that is discrimination.
We should legalize sex selection
legalizing sex selection is a good option for people looking to have a specific sex of child.
we shouldn't legalize sex selection because some people can't have children at all, they should be happy that they have blessed with a miracle. if you want to choose a sex then foster or adopt a certain sex
We should legalize sex selection
legalizing sex selection is a good option for people looking to have a specific sex of child.
we shouldn't limit executive compensation because it can give instant as access to money for your needs like a buying a house
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
we shouldn't limit executive compensation because it can help pay for bigger purchases
We should limit executive compensation
executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain
we shouldn't limit executive compensation because it's a reward for hard work and the employees may feel not worthy if they are not rewarded
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
we shouldn't limit executive compensation because those people worked hard to get to that position and should be awarded for it.
We should limit executive compensation
executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such
we shouldn't limit executive compensation for integritu of the people
We should limit executive compensation
executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain
we shouldn't limit executive compensation. the whole point of becoming an executive is working up the ladder for years in order to receive the six figure salary and lucrative bonuses.
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
we shouldn't limit judicial activism because it can help blur the lines between right and wrong with the law isn't clear
We should limit judicial activism
we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective.
we shouldn't limit judicial activism because it may not be fair
We should limit judicial activism
we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective.
we shouldn't limit judicial activism because this is an opportunity for democracy to work. many of the laws treat people unfairly and this type of activism can change politics positively.
We should limit judicial activism
we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective.
We shouldn't limit what the judicial system has the potential to do, it is an un-nuanced policy to ban something outright.
We should abolish capital punishment
capital punishment is inhumane and often an unfit punishment for the crime
we shouldn't oppose collectivism because everyone deserves to be individual
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we shouldn't oppose collectivism because it creates cohesiveness in society. it creates less conflicts and brings us all together by removing barriers.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we shouldn't oppose collectivism because sometimes you have to look out for what is best for society as a whole and not how it would benefit a specific individual.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we shouldn't oppose collectivism. it can be useful for increasing harmony in society and creating less conflicts.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we shouldn't pay for space exploration because there may be dangerous things we don't know about up in space and if we explore it, it may attack us.
We should subsidize space exploration
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.
we shouldn't privilege fathers over mothers when it comes to staying at home with kids.
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads so that they can have the same opportunity to bond with their child as the mother.
we shouldn't prohibit flag burning as it may be a symbol to some countries as being top dog
We should prohibit flag burning
flag burning should be prohibited because it is a practice used by foreign countries to protest whatever they want about our country. we should respect our flag.
we shouldn't prohibit flag burning because it is a way of showing freedom of speech
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we shouldn't prohibit flag burning because it would interfere with the right to freedom of speech
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer as it's a human right to be able to pray
We should prohibit school prayer
we should prohibit school prayer because there is supposed to be a separation between church and state and because it's not fair to promote one religion over another.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer because a child has the right to pray wherever they please
We should prohibit school prayer
we should not prohibit school prayer because it exposes kids to positive moral beliefs and practices.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer because is important for religious education
We should prohibit school prayer
we should not prohibit school prayer because it exposes kids to positive moral beliefs and practices.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer because it can be eye-opening for children to see diverse religions and cultures which can increase their understanding of the world
We should prohibit school prayer
we should prohibit school prayer because there is supposed to be a separation between church and state and because it's not fair to promote one religion over another.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer because it goes against the right of freedom of religion
We should prohibit school prayer
we should not prohibit school prayer because it exposes kids to positive moral beliefs and practices.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer because prayer is sacred and children should be able to pray whenever and wherever they please
We should prohibit school prayer
we should prohibit school prayer because there is supposed to be a separation between church and state and because it's not fair to promote one religion over another.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer because some people may deeply believe in it.
We should prohibit school prayer
we should not prohibit school prayer because it exposes kids to positive moral beliefs and practices.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer for child education
We should prohibit school prayer
we should not prohibit school prayer because it exposes kids to positive moral beliefs and practices.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer for their religious education of children
We should prohibit school prayer
we should not prohibit school prayer because it exposes kids to positive moral beliefs and practices.
we shouldn't prohibit school prayer for values and principes of our children
We should prohibit school prayer
we should not prohibit school prayer because it exposes kids to positive moral beliefs and practices.
we shouldn't prohibit women from being in combat because that is unfair.
We should prohibit women in combat
women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of them
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat in some area in capacity
We should prohibit women in combat
women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of them
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat as woman are equal to men in many ways. we all have the right to fight
We should prohibit women in combat
women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it.
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat because is complementary in event
We should prohibit women in combat
women should not be excluded from combat based on gender. combat capabilities are person related, not gender related.
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat because it can help advance their careers
We should prohibit women in combat
women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it.
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat because it helps proof that their gender does effect their abilities
We should prohibit women in combat
women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of them
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat because it lets women pursue something they are passionate about
We should prohibit women in combat
women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it.
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat if is capacity of
We should prohibit women in combat
women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of them
we shouldn't prohibit women in combat in last time women is bes prepared
We should prohibit women in combat
women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it.
we shouldnt prohibit women in combat they have chosen their profession and made an informed choice and some may be better then men at some skills
We should prohibit women in combat
women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it.
we shouldn't single vocational education out as a special case for subsidies; all types of education need to be supported.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
we shouldn't stop the development of autonomous cars because the world will never move on
We should stop the development of autonomous cars
autonomous cars are dangerous and shouldn't be allowed. we all know technology fails often, and allowing someone to put their life (and the lives of those around them) in jeopardy is not necessary in this way.
we shouldn't stop the development of autonomous cars. they are the future of automobiles. humans have proved incapable of safely driving, but these cars will improve safety and increase productivity.
We should stop the development of autonomous cars
autonomous cars are dangerous and shouldn't be allowed. we all know technology fails often, and allowing someone to put their life (and the lives of those around them) in jeopardy is not necessary in this way.
we shouldn't stop woman going into combat because everyone is equal and if a woman thinks she can fight then she should be allowed to do so..
We should prohibit women in combat
women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it.
we shouldn't subsidize embryonic stem cell research because we could be researching more important projects like cancer or a cure for aids
We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research
we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes.
we shouldn't subsidize journalism because it will lead to media telling people whatever the government wants it to. this will not lead to honest and accurate news stories which we need in society.
We should subsidize journalism
Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them".
we shouldn't subsidize journalism. there are plenty of people who can privately fund journalism if they wish and keep us informed. there are more important causes to invest in than government journalists
We should subsidize journalism
Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them".
we shouldn't subsidize space exploration because it can be very costly
We should subsidize space exploration
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.
we shouldn't subsidize space exploration because it is too expensive for little result
We should subsidize space exploration
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.
we shouldn't subsidize space exploration because the money could be better spent on other things such as the nhs or the social care system
We should subsidize space exploration
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.
we shouldnt subsidize space exploration we have world poverty which needs to be resolved and the money could go on funding that
We should subsidize space exploration
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.
we shouldnt subsidize stay at home dads its their choice to have children
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can.
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads as it's their choice to have children and not work
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can.
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads because stay at home moms aren't subsidized
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can.
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads because stay at home moms does get subsidized
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can.
we shouldn't subsidize stay-at-home dads when the man is young
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can.
we shouldn't subsidize stem cell research because it can be privately funded. there are better causes like healthcare for the government to invest in and this type of research is controversial.
We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research
we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes.
we shouldn't subsidize student loans as they have chosen to study and it will cost the government more money that could be spent elsewhere
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we shouldn't subsidize student loans because it puts large amounts of money back into the economy.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we shouldn't subsidize student loans because it will cause students with low income to be in debt they don't need to be in
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we shouldn't subsidize student loans because it will lead the student to be in debt
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we shouldn't subsidize student loans because of high interest rates students will be thousands of dollars in debt after graduation with no job to pay it back
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we shouldn't subsidize student loans because they are already cheap enough and i don't think the banks would be able to handle any lower prices.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we shouldn't subsidize the student loans because it just costs too much. there are numerous other societal benefits programs that must be funded first.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we shouldn't subsidize vocational education because it should be up to each individual to support themselves for the career route they want to pursue
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
we shouldn't subsidize vocational education because jobs in that field are often low paying
We should subsidize vocational education
we should subsidize vocational education because we need to focus on this type of training moving forward to draw people into key careers.
we shouldn't subsidize vocational education because many children and young adults don't really know what they want to do and they may change their minds several times before deciding on a career path
We should subsidize vocational education
subsidizing vocational education is a must. there will always be a need for people to fix things, and teaching your child a skill is setting them up for future success.
we shouldn't subsidize vocational education because these types of careers are usually low paying
We should subsidize vocational education
we should subsidize vocational education because we need to focus on this type of training moving forward to draw people into key careers.
we shouldn't subsidize vocational education because trades jobs are becoming few and far between.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education because there is a shortage of tradesmen and women.
we shouldn't subsidize vocational education. most companies provide training to employees and this is their duty. the government has lots of more important things to subsidize like medical care.
We should subsidize vocational education
subsidizing vocational education is a must. there will always be a need for people to fix things, and teaching your child a skill is setting them up for future success.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because have many activities an win much money in advertising
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because it's not important, maybe people want to remain anonymous and with wikipedia that is not possible
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because pages on wikipedia is user created and isn't always accurate
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because the information on it isn't trustworthy because it is user created and can be edited by anyone.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia because there is a lot of untrustworthy information especially on less popular pages
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we shouldn't subsidize wikipedia for the resources and money generated
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we shouldn't support vocational education because it prevents children from going to college
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
we shouldn't support vocational education because people may take advantage of the system and a lot of money will be wasted from the government.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
we shouldn't try to toy with things god as created, we are likely to unleash undesirable consequences on ourselves
We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research
embryonic stem cell research is ethically unsound, and the long term consequences are unknown.
we shouldn't van cosmetic surgery for minors because everyone had the right to feel confident in their own skin.
We should ban cosmetic surgery for minors
we should ban cosmetic surgery for minors because they are too young to decide what they want
we shouldn't van telemarketing because telemarketers need to make a living too.
We should ban telemarketing
telemarketing is a waste of time for all parties involved, it rarely results in a sale for the company doing the telemarketing and provides a disturbance in the lives of those who are called
we shouldn'tfight urbanization because is dangerous and mortal
We should fight urbanization
we should fight urbanization because it has adverse effects on human health for example due to increased air pollution