argument
stringlengths
35
251
topic
stringlengths
21
52
example
stringlengths
37
230
Collectivist laws prevent the massive wealth and political gaps that we see in our modern societies, which not only threaten our social stability, but also our long term economic well-being.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
Collectivist practices maximize the general well-being of the populace by ensuring that all individuals are at least cared for to the extent that they can live a healthy and productive life.
We should oppose collectivism
Collectivist cultures take better care of society than individualistic cultures do.
collectivist society is usually more stable due to the fact that everyone is looking out for the group.
We should oppose collectivism
Collectivist cultures take better care of society than individualistic cultures do.
collectivity, a group of people can get far more done than individually.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism encourages laziness and lack of ambition by rewarding everyone equally
Collectivizing resources often leads to an inefficient allocation of those resources, as central authority is often incapable of understanding which regions and people are most in need of those resources, or could use them most efficiently.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism encourages laziness and lack of ambition by rewarding everyone equally
collectvism is unfair to the world and is irrational
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
college is getting more and more expensive each year so students should be getting as much help as they need
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
college is not affordable anymore. an education can cost more than a home. paying money to some student loan bills allow graduates to prosper, buying homes and cars and supporting the economy.
We should subsidize student loans
student loans is a help for those who do not have resources
college is preferable to vocational education.
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
college isn't for everyone so going to a place that teaches you the skills for your chosen profession
We should subsidize vocational education
While many who graduate from universities struggle to find high paying jobs in their field, graduates of vocational schools have high employments and high standards of living.
colleges are meant to teach people things, and students leaving for a safe space whenever they disagree with the topic doesn't help them to learn anything.
We should abolish safe spaces
safe spaces are vital to many, especially on campuses where the students that feel excluded or discriminated against have a safe haven to enable them to feel comfortable in continuing their education
Colleges are no more relevant these days. Going to college doesn't assured you good and sure job. Subsidizing students loans only add to government budget deficit while this money can serve other good purposes
We should subsidize student loans
subsidizing student loans will enable many more people the opportunity to attend college
combat is never an individual against another individual and women are capable of using the same weapons as men as long as they are trained properly
We should prohibit women in combat
women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it.
combat is too brutal and harsh and women should be prohibited from it
We should prohibit women in combat
women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of them
committment and stability are important in the lives of children and marriage provides these qualities
We should abandon marriage
marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always.
commodifying women's bodies, especially the poor women who tend to be surrogates, is dehumanizing.
Surrogacy should be banned
surrogacy can lead to the exploitation of poor women for the benefit of the rich.
companies and goverments cannot afford the luxury of allowing dads to stay at home.
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
We should not subsidize stay-at-home dads as people should work out as a family how to manage maternity and paternity leave as part of their cost of bringing up a child.
companies and individuals spend a long time often even years developing services and products , they will have spent a lot of their own money too and need the chance to recoup this.
We should abolish intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights are important to protect the assets of those who have invested time and money into a particular idea.
Companies are not only run by executives. Everybody in the companies should benefit from the productivity of their company. Limiting the compensation for executives and redistributes would be of a great effect
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
companies are paying their top executives thousands of times more than their workers, claiming they can't afford to pay more than minimum wage to the people who do the bulk of the work for the company.
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
companies are spending to much money to register their patents and that money could be spent to develop better products
We should abolish intellectual property rights
intellectual property rights should be abolished as it limits competitions and innovation.
companies have a right to advertise and try to generate business.
We should ban telemarketing
banning telemarketing puts an unfair limit on a business's ability to find customers.
companies have the right to give their executives extra incentives for their work
We should limit executive compensation
executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such
Companies in foreign countries such as Iraq face huge dangers doing business and need the protection from private military contractors. Government employees get bodyguards why not other people?
We should ban private military companies
Private military companies lack oversight and accountability. It is too dangerous to have a military bound to serve who pays it versus the ethical framework of serving the public good.
companies invest billions into research, if there are no rights it would dissuade companies from conducting research in the first place.
We should abolish intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights are important to protect the assets of those who have invested time and money into a particular idea.
companies invest millions in research and development if other entities are able to use such ideas without prior investment then it's deeply unfair to the companies who developed the ideas.
We should abolish intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights are important to protect the assets of those who have invested time and money into a particular idea.
companies need to be able to end an employment at a practical age
We should end mandatory retirement
in today's society people are living to a greater age and we should not penalise those people who want to continue working by forcing them to retire.
companies need to be able to offer whatever salaries they need to to ensure they get the necessary talent.
We should limit executive compensation
to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential.
companies should be able to do whatever they need to in order to attract the best talent.
We should limit executive compensation
to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential.
companies should be able to pay as much as they like as long as it's above minimum wahe
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
companies should be allowed to call random people by telephone if it helps their business
We should ban telemarketing
we cannot force a company to not market itself over the telephone, this is hugely restrictive in what should be a free society
companies should be allowed to pay their staff as much as they wish to
We should limit executive compensation
executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such
Companies should be banned from cold calling and should be forced to comply with requests from their customers to opt out of solicitation calls
We should ban telemarketing
banning telemarketing puts an unfair limit on a business's ability to find customers.
companies should be free to compensate executives in any way they like
We should limit executive compensation
executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such
companies should be free to run how they see if without anyone coming into oversee how they operate.
We should limit executive compensation
companies should be allowed to pay their staff as much as they wish to
companies should have the freedom to offer merchandize any way they please.
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading should be banned because it makes investors really reliant on technology and the systems that it deploys
companies which have properly researched and developed new products need to be protected so that research cost can be recouped. without this why research when you can just copy.
We should abolish intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights are important to protect the assets of those who have invested time and money into a particular idea.
companies will shut down without this kind of aggressive approach and that would mean a loss of jobs
We should ban telemarketing
banning telemarketing puts an unfair limit on a business's ability to find customers.
companies with a mandatory retirement policy might avoid becoming stale and outdated by constantly infusing their workforces with fresh talent
We should end mandatory retirement
By freeing up space across professional hierarchies mandatory retirement provides more opportunities for career growth and upward mobility for younger people.
companies would not be able to compete fairly to attract the best candidates if executive compensation was limited
We should limit executive compensation
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage.
COMPANYS GROW BECAUSE OF THE MANAGEMENT BONUS SCHEMES
We should limit executive compensation
to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential.
compared to monogamous women, women in polygynous marriages are much more likely to experience abuse, depression and poverty
We should legalize polygamy
Polygamous unions can cause cause jealousy and emotional distress among the multiple spouses.
compensation to executives is necessary because it is a support to a mass of people without whom the economy was not in the privileged position in which it has been
We should limit executive compensation
executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such
competition between countries prevents working towards peace
We should abolish the Olympic Games
the olympics help foster friendship between nations.
competition might be more fair this way.
We should abolish intellectual property rights
we should abolish this because it could give someone a monopoly in the certain inductural sector and give them the unfair chance.
compulsive voting is a patriotic act that must be fully complied with.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory help get people involved in the election process.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory retirement is necessary and fair because it gives workers the opportunity to enjoy their old age without completing a workday. non-execution of mandatory retirement should not end
We should end mandatory retirement
in today's society people are living to a greater age and we should not penalise those people who want to continue working by forcing them to retire.
compulsory voting would get everyone a voice in the election
We should introduce compulsory voting
by requiring all citizens to vote, we would be able to elect politicians who more accurately represent the public's will.
compulsory voting allows all citizens the chance to make a difference
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting can help encourage better results during elections
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting could also be used sort of like a census to count people.
We should introduce compulsory voting
Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.
compulsory voting could be used as a way to check population and make sure everyone has current ids.
We should introduce compulsory voting
Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.
compulsory voting could improve peoples knowledge of politics if they knew they had to vote they might learn more about politics
We should introduce compulsory voting
by requiring all citizens to vote, we would be able to elect politicians who more accurately represent the public's will.
compulsory voting could improve the election process by ensuring the candidate or party with the broadest cross-generational support wins.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting makes sure that each and every person has a vote in who is running their government and how.
compulsory voting could lead to an uninformed public electing unqualified people to office
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that our leaders reflect the will of all people, not just those who were able/motivated enough to make it to the polls.
compulsory voting does not promote democratic engagement instead in turns voting in to a tick box excercise
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting doesn’t ensure that the citizens will be more informed about their votes
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting educates the population.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting ensures everyone's vote will be counted
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting ensures that all eligible voters have a say in the election instead of having just portion of the population decide
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting ensures that our leaders reflect the will of all people, not just those who were able/motivated enough to make it to the polls.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting forces low information voters into the system that may only vote for candidates that promise free services.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is an infringement on personal choice
compulsory voting forces people to engage with democracy
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting forces the citizen to pay attention the policies that affect them and decide accordingly instead of allowing only certain groups to control policy.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting gives everyone a say in their elections
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting gives everyone in society their say in politics
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting goes against people's liberties and freedoms.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting goes against the freedoms of the country that let every person decide what they do or do not want to be involved in.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting goes against what democracy stands for
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting greatly increases voter turnout
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting improves voting turnaround.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting increases voter turnout tremendously
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting infringes on our freedom.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting infringes on people's rights to not vote as a protest against plethora of things, such as the voting system as it is, corruption in government, etc.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting infringes on peoples rights.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is a foolish idea. if people are not already voting, it's obvious they hold no care for politics and their more than likely uneducated votes should not be included.
We should introduce compulsory voting
Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.
compulsory voting is a must to ensure that all people's voices are heard.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting is a violation of civil rights
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is a violation of one's free will and government should not infringe on a persons free will choice.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is against freedom, everyone has the right to choose whether or not they want to vote in a free & open society
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is against our right to freedom.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is an infringement on personal autonomy
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is an infringement on personal choice
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is contrary to our civil rights
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is in complete violation of the democratic process, which is freedom of action and expression - forcing anything on a person is wrong.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is inconvenient, especially to those with mobility issues or just cannot take time off work to vote.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is necessary to truly reflect the will of the people, if people don't participate they could mail in a form stating that they weren't voting because of disinterest rather than innaccessability
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is not an answer, because those people who do not care or know exactly what they are voting for may just vote for random things even though they may ultimately oppose what they are voting for.
We should introduce compulsory voting
Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.
compulsory voting is not only ridiculous it would also be impossible to enforce.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting will force citizens to vote even if they do not understand the system and therefore give a false election result.
compulsory voting is the only way to make people getting involved in the choices necessary for the real management of a country,
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting is unconstitutional, and forcing people to do something they do not want to do never turns out as planned.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .
compulsory voting makes elections have a more reliable outcome
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting makes for more informed voters
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting makes sure that each and every person has a vote in who is running their government and how.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting makes sure that each and every person has a vote in who is running their government and how.
compulsory voting makes the population more involved in the election process, and would give results that more accurately reflected the will of the electors.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population.
compulsory voting may lead to voting being a national holiday, therefore eliminating the pervasive problem of people not being able to get off of work to vote.
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting makes sure that each and every person has a vote in who is running their government and how.
compulsory voting means people can complain if votes dont go their way
We should introduce compulsory voting
compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .