Datasets:

binhng

/

scoring_ielts_dataset_v1

like 1

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives. Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: During Survival, every individual often finds himself faced with decisions that require to take gambles, whether in professional endeavours or personal pursuits. This situation has both benefits and drawbacks. This article explores the significance of embracing risks, delving into both the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. Primarily, taking risks can lead to remarkable rewards. It allows us to step out of our comfort zones and achieve personal growth. Individuals can develop new skills and have valuable experiences by taking chances in growth. For instance, someone who decides to start their own business may face financial uncertainty initially, but the potential for success and financial independence can be immensely rewarding. Thus, the willingness to take such chances can lead to innovation and progress in various aspects of life. Despite undeniable advantages to taking chances, there are also potential downsides. Specifically, uncertainties can sometimes lead to failure or setbacks, causing financial, emotional, or even physical harm. For example, a person who invests all their savings in a high-risk venture might face financial ruin if it does not come out as expected. Moreover, excessive risk-taking can lead to stress and anxiety, affecting one's mental and emotional well-being. Hence, there are some downsides to stepping into danger with courage and determination. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, it is important to embrace opportunities for growth and progress; however, it is essential to approach risk-taking with caution and a well-informed strategy to minimize potential drawbacks. Therefore, in my opinion, the benefits of taking risks often outweigh the disadvantages, provided that we do so thoughtfully and responsibly, ultimately leading to a richer and more fulfilling life. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives. Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: During Survival, every individual often finds himself faced with decisions that require to take gambles, whether in professional endeavours or personal pursuits. This situation has both benefits and drawbacks. This article explores the significance of embracing risks, delving into both the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. Primarily, taking risks can lead to remarkable rewards. It allows us to step out of our comfort zones and achieve personal growth. Individuals can develop new skills and have valuable experiences by taking chances in growth. For instance, someone who decides to start their own business may face financial uncertainty initially, but the potential for success and financial independence can be immensely rewarding. Thus, the willingness to take such chances can lead to innovation and progress in various aspects of life. Despite undeniable advantages to taking chances, there are also potential downsides. Specifically, uncertainties can sometimes lead to failure or setbacks, causing financial, emotional, or even physical harm. For example, a person who invests all their savings in a high-risk venture might face financial ruin if it does not come out as expected. Moreover, excessive risk-taking can lead to stress and anxiety, affecting one's mental and emotional well-being. Hence, there are some downsides to stepping into danger with courage and determination. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, it is important to embrace opportunities for growth and progress; however, it is essential to approach risk-taking with caution and a well-informed strategy to minimize potential drawbacks. Therefore, in my opinion, the benefits of taking risks often outweigh the disadvantages, provided that we do so thoughtfully and responsibly, ultimately leading to a richer and more fulfilling life. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives. Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: During Survival, every individual often finds himself faced with decisions that require to take gambles, whether in professional endeavours or personal pursuits. This situation has both benefits and drawbacks. This article explores the significance of embracing risks, delving into both the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. Primarily, taking risks can lead to remarkable rewards. It allows us to step out of our comfort zones and achieve personal growth. Individuals can develop new skills and have valuable experiences by taking chances in growth. For instance, someone who decides to start their own business may face financial uncertainty initially, but the potential for success and financial independence can be immensely rewarding. Thus, the willingness to take such chances can lead to innovation and progress in various aspects of life. Despite undeniable advantages to taking chances, there are also potential downsides. Specifically, uncertainties can sometimes lead to failure or setbacks, causing financial, emotional, or even physical harm. For example, a person who invests all their savings in a high-risk venture might face financial ruin if it does not come out as expected. Moreover, excessive risk-taking can lead to stress and anxiety, affecting one's mental and emotional well-being. Hence, there are some downsides to stepping into danger with courage and determination. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, it is important to embrace opportunities for growth and progress; however, it is essential to approach risk-taking with caution and a well-informed strategy to minimize potential drawbacks. Therefore, in my opinion, the benefits of taking risks often outweigh the disadvantages, provided that we do so thoughtfully and responsibly, ultimately leading to a richer and more fulfilling life. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives. Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: During Survival, every individual often finds himself faced with decisions that require to take gambles, whether in professional endeavours or personal pursuits. This situation has both benefits and drawbacks. This article explores the significance of embracing risks, delving into both the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. Primarily, taking risks can lead to remarkable rewards. It allows us to step out of our comfort zones and achieve personal growth. Individuals can develop new skills and have valuable experiences by taking chances in growth. For instance, someone who decides to start their own business may face financial uncertainty initially, but the potential for success and financial independence can be immensely rewarding. Thus, the willingness to take such chances can lead to innovation and progress in various aspects of life. Despite undeniable advantages to taking chances, there are also potential downsides. Specifically, uncertainties can sometimes lead to failure or setbacks, causing financial, emotional, or even physical harm. For example, a person who invests all their savings in a high-risk venture might face financial ruin if it does not come out as expected. Moreover, excessive risk-taking can lead to stress and anxiety, affecting one's mental and emotional well-being. Hence, there are some downsides to stepping into danger with courage and determination. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, it is important to embrace opportunities for growth and progress; however, it is essential to approach risk-taking with caution and a well-informed strategy to minimize potential drawbacks. Therefore, in my opinion, the benefits of taking risks often outweigh the disadvantages, provided that we do so thoughtfully and responsibly, ultimately leading to a richer and more fulfilling life. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the government should decide which subject should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion. Anwser: In our contemporary, knowledge-driven society, possessing academic qualifications is paramount. There are contrasting viewpoints regarding whether the government should dictate university majors or if students should have the freedom to select their preferred fields of study. On one side of the argument, proponents of government intervention in subject allocation argue that it can alleviate issues related to unemployment and labour shortages in specific sectors. In certain industries, there exists either a surplus of job opportunities with a scarcity of qualified candidates or an oversupply of qualified individuals without suitable employment. With government oversight, authorities can allocate more university slots for fields suffering from a workforce deficit and fewer slots for industries saturated with labour. This strategy promotes balanced competition and, consequently, reduces unemployment rates. Moreover, it can address the problem of insufficient skilled labour in emerging sectors, thereby fostering their growth. Conversely, an opposing viewpoint asserts that allowing students to choose their majors based on their interests fosters intrinsic motivation. When students study subjects that align with their passions, their enthusiasm and engagement increase significantly. This heightened interest can drive them to excel academically because they willingly invest more time and effort in delving deeper into their chosen subjects. Additionally, when students have the freedom to select their academic paths, they can tailor their education to align with their career goals, adapt to their learning progress, and address their weaknesses. This approach facilitates a holistic and well-rounded learning experience. In conclusion, while both approaches offer advantages from different angles, personally, I believe that authorities should empower the next generation by allowing them to choose their fields of study based on their preferences, as this approach is more conducive to their overall development. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the government should decide which subject should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion. Anwser: In our contemporary, knowledge-driven society, possessing academic qualifications is paramount. There are contrasting viewpoints regarding whether the government should dictate university majors or if students should have the freedom to select their preferred fields of study. On one side of the argument, proponents of government intervention in subject allocation argue that it can alleviate issues related to unemployment and labour shortages in specific sectors. In certain industries, there exists either a surplus of job opportunities with a scarcity of qualified candidates or an oversupply of qualified individuals without suitable employment. With government oversight, authorities can allocate more university slots for fields suffering from a workforce deficit and fewer slots for industries saturated with labour. This strategy promotes balanced competition and, consequently, reduces unemployment rates. Moreover, it can address the problem of insufficient skilled labour in emerging sectors, thereby fostering their growth. Conversely, an opposing viewpoint asserts that allowing students to choose their majors based on their interests fosters intrinsic motivation. When students study subjects that align with their passions, their enthusiasm and engagement increase significantly. This heightened interest can drive them to excel academically because they willingly invest more time and effort in delving deeper into their chosen subjects. Additionally, when students have the freedom to select their academic paths, they can tailor their education to align with their career goals, adapt to their learning progress, and address their weaknesses. This approach facilitates a holistic and well-rounded learning experience. In conclusion, while both approaches offer advantages from different angles, personally, I believe that authorities should empower the next generation by allowing them to choose their fields of study based on their preferences, as this approach is more conducive to their overall development. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the government should decide which subject should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion. Anwser: In our contemporary, knowledge-driven society, possessing academic qualifications is paramount. There are contrasting viewpoints regarding whether the government should dictate university majors or if students should have the freedom to select their preferred fields of study. On one side of the argument, proponents of government intervention in subject allocation argue that it can alleviate issues related to unemployment and labour shortages in specific sectors. In certain industries, there exists either a surplus of job opportunities with a scarcity of qualified candidates or an oversupply of qualified individuals without suitable employment. With government oversight, authorities can allocate more university slots for fields suffering from a workforce deficit and fewer slots for industries saturated with labour. This strategy promotes balanced competition and, consequently, reduces unemployment rates. Moreover, it can address the problem of insufficient skilled labour in emerging sectors, thereby fostering their growth. Conversely, an opposing viewpoint asserts that allowing students to choose their majors based on their interests fosters intrinsic motivation. When students study subjects that align with their passions, their enthusiasm and engagement increase significantly. This heightened interest can drive them to excel academically because they willingly invest more time and effort in delving deeper into their chosen subjects. Additionally, when students have the freedom to select their academic paths, they can tailor their education to align with their career goals, adapt to their learning progress, and address their weaknesses. This approach facilitates a holistic and well-rounded learning experience. In conclusion, while both approaches offer advantages from different angles, personally, I believe that authorities should empower the next generation by allowing them to choose their fields of study based on their preferences, as this approach is more conducive to their overall development. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the government should decide which subject should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion. Anwser: In our contemporary, knowledge-driven society, possessing academic qualifications is paramount. There are contrasting viewpoints regarding whether the government should dictate university majors or if students should have the freedom to select their preferred fields of study. On one side of the argument, proponents of government intervention in subject allocation argue that it can alleviate issues related to unemployment and labour shortages in specific sectors. In certain industries, there exists either a surplus of job opportunities with a scarcity of qualified candidates or an oversupply of qualified individuals without suitable employment. With government oversight, authorities can allocate more university slots for fields suffering from a workforce deficit and fewer slots for industries saturated with labour. This strategy promotes balanced competition and, consequently, reduces unemployment rates. Moreover, it can address the problem of insufficient skilled labour in emerging sectors, thereby fostering their growth. Conversely, an opposing viewpoint asserts that allowing students to choose their majors based on their interests fosters intrinsic motivation. When students study subjects that align with their passions, their enthusiasm and engagement increase significantly. This heightened interest can drive them to excel academically because they willingly invest more time and effort in delving deeper into their chosen subjects. Additionally, when students have the freedom to select their academic paths, they can tailor their education to align with their career goals, adapt to their learning progress, and address their weaknesses. This approach facilitates a holistic and well-rounded learning experience. In conclusion, while both approaches offer advantages from different angles, personally, I believe that authorities should empower the next generation by allowing them to choose their fields of study based on their preferences, as this approach is more conducive to their overall development. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Nowadays, the workforce has a difference in their opinion with many accepting their financial conditions, unwanted jobs and trying to live with them.However, others put effort to achieve their ambitions. In my opinion, losing hope creates more problems and a person should focus on the goals without thinking of the current circumstances. It is difficult to get a satisfactory profession while dealing with all the expenses on a low budget. To illustrate, getting a degree is a problem due to high fees and an individual cannot effort, hence they do not achieve the goals of better work opportunities. Moreover, a man without money do not have many options in regards to jobs, and only struggle to stabilize the financial conditions even if the profession is not favourable. It is better to have a career rather than be unemployed. Similarly, living a dream life is not possible for all human beings so one should try to make the best out of what he or she has. On the other hand, everyone should do an effort to establish their dreams, which is better than losing hope. Becoming successful is a difficult task but not impossible.For example, all the affluents focus on goals and after spending a lot of time, they succeed in life. Likewise, only that person achieve their desire, who takes initiative. To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that taking initiative is best and everyone needs to be ambitious as well as should not get demotivated. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Nowadays, the workforce has a difference in their opinion with many accepting their financial conditions, unwanted jobs and trying to live with them.However, others put effort to achieve their ambitions. In my opinion, losing hope creates more problems and a person should focus on the goals without thinking of the current circumstances. It is difficult to get a satisfactory profession while dealing with all the expenses on a low budget. To illustrate, getting a degree is a problem due to high fees and an individual cannot effort, hence they do not achieve the goals of better work opportunities. Moreover, a man without money do not have many options in regards to jobs, and only struggle to stabilize the financial conditions even if the profession is not favourable. It is better to have a career rather than be unemployed. Similarly, living a dream life is not possible for all human beings so one should try to make the best out of what he or she has. On the other hand, everyone should do an effort to establish their dreams, which is better than losing hope. Becoming successful is a difficult task but not impossible.For example, all the affluents focus on goals and after spending a lot of time, they succeed in life. Likewise, only that person achieve their desire, who takes initiative. To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that taking initiative is best and everyone needs to be ambitious as well as should not get demotivated. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Nowadays, the workforce has a difference in their opinion with many accepting their financial conditions, unwanted jobs and trying to live with them.However, others put effort to achieve their ambitions. In my opinion, losing hope creates more problems and a person should focus on the goals without thinking of the current circumstances. It is difficult to get a satisfactory profession while dealing with all the expenses on a low budget. To illustrate, getting a degree is a problem due to high fees and an individual cannot effort, hence they do not achieve the goals of better work opportunities. Moreover, a man without money do not have many options in regards to jobs, and only struggle to stabilize the financial conditions even if the profession is not favourable. It is better to have a career rather than be unemployed. Similarly, living a dream life is not possible for all human beings so one should try to make the best out of what he or she has. On the other hand, everyone should do an effort to establish their dreams, which is better than losing hope. Becoming successful is a difficult task but not impossible.For example, all the affluents focus on goals and after spending a lot of time, they succeed in life. Likewise, only that person achieve their desire, who takes initiative. To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that taking initiative is best and everyone needs to be ambitious as well as should not get demotivated. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Nowadays, the workforce has a difference in their opinion with many accepting their financial conditions, unwanted jobs and trying to live with them.However, others put effort to achieve their ambitions. In my opinion, losing hope creates more problems and a person should focus on the goals without thinking of the current circumstances. It is difficult to get a satisfactory profession while dealing with all the expenses on a low budget. To illustrate, getting a degree is a problem due to high fees and an individual cannot effort, hence they do not achieve the goals of better work opportunities. Moreover, a man without money do not have many options in regards to jobs, and only struggle to stabilize the financial conditions even if the profession is not favourable. It is better to have a career rather than be unemployed. Similarly, living a dream life is not possible for all human beings so one should try to make the best out of what he or she has. On the other hand, everyone should do an effort to establish their dreams, which is better than losing hope. Becoming successful is a difficult task but not impossible.For example, all the affluents focus on goals and after spending a lot of time, they succeed in life. Likewise, only that person achieve their desire, who takes initiative. To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that taking initiative is best and everyone needs to be ambitious as well as should not get demotivated. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some cultures think old people are of higher value than the youth, while other cultures value the youth more. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Anwser: There is a debate whether who is precious, some ideologies believe that older people are precious while others believe that youth are. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and why I believe that older people precious than youngsters. On one hand, there is a group that supports the notion that youth has intrinsic value than other age groups and the main reason why this group thinks that is because they are the future. Hence, if a country wants to build a bright future, establish a stable economy, and create jobs, it should start with its youth. Thus, to manifest these desired goals a regime should be invested in young adults through sponsoring talents, offering good education, and most importantly to spending on science. Furthermore, kids have the ability to absorb lessons faster than seniors, so this is to say that kids have the potential to be the modified edition of someone old mistakes. On the other hand, there is a consensus that wants to divert its focus and energy towards seniors and this is due to the fact that they have an abundance of experience. Eventually, older citizens will have passed their experiences to the younger generation. For instance, the main source for stories, tales, and myths came from our previous generation. Not to mention, some have the value that says treat people the way you want to be treated, so people strive to give care to these seniors. In fact, by doing this conduct they illustrate an epitome for today youth. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, it is my opinion that older people have substantial value than offspring and we should give them special care. This is because of their accumulated experiences and expresses a positive model for the changed generation. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some cultures think old people are of higher value than the youth, while other cultures value the youth more. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Anwser: There is a debate whether who is precious, some ideologies believe that older people are precious while others believe that youth are. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and why I believe that older people precious than youngsters. On one hand, there is a group that supports the notion that youth has intrinsic value than other age groups and the main reason why this group thinks that is because they are the future. Hence, if a country wants to build a bright future, establish a stable economy, and create jobs, it should start with its youth. Thus, to manifest these desired goals a regime should be invested in young adults through sponsoring talents, offering good education, and most importantly to spending on science. Furthermore, kids have the ability to absorb lessons faster than seniors, so this is to say that kids have the potential to be the modified edition of someone old mistakes. On the other hand, there is a consensus that wants to divert its focus and energy towards seniors and this is due to the fact that they have an abundance of experience. Eventually, older citizens will have passed their experiences to the younger generation. For instance, the main source for stories, tales, and myths came from our previous generation. Not to mention, some have the value that says treat people the way you want to be treated, so people strive to give care to these seniors. In fact, by doing this conduct they illustrate an epitome for today youth. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, it is my opinion that older people have substantial value than offspring and we should give them special care. This is because of their accumulated experiences and expresses a positive model for the changed generation. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some cultures think old people are of higher value than the youth, while other cultures value the youth more. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Anwser: There is a debate whether who is precious, some ideologies believe that older people are precious while others believe that youth are. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and why I believe that older people precious than youngsters. On one hand, there is a group that supports the notion that youth has intrinsic value than other age groups and the main reason why this group thinks that is because they are the future. Hence, if a country wants to build a bright future, establish a stable economy, and create jobs, it should start with its youth. Thus, to manifest these desired goals a regime should be invested in young adults through sponsoring talents, offering good education, and most importantly to spending on science. Furthermore, kids have the ability to absorb lessons faster than seniors, so this is to say that kids have the potential to be the modified edition of someone old mistakes. On the other hand, there is a consensus that wants to divert its focus and energy towards seniors and this is due to the fact that they have an abundance of experience. Eventually, older citizens will have passed their experiences to the younger generation. For instance, the main source for stories, tales, and myths came from our previous generation. Not to mention, some have the value that says treat people the way you want to be treated, so people strive to give care to these seniors. In fact, by doing this conduct they illustrate an epitome for today youth. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, it is my opinion that older people have substantial value than offspring and we should give them special care. This is because of their accumulated experiences and expresses a positive model for the changed generation. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some cultures think old people are of higher value than the youth, while other cultures value the youth more. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Anwser: There is a debate whether who is precious, some ideologies believe that older people are precious while others believe that youth are. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and why I believe that older people precious than youngsters. On one hand, there is a group that supports the notion that youth has intrinsic value than other age groups and the main reason why this group thinks that is because they are the future. Hence, if a country wants to build a bright future, establish a stable economy, and create jobs, it should start with its youth. Thus, to manifest these desired goals a regime should be invested in young adults through sponsoring talents, offering good education, and most importantly to spending on science. Furthermore, kids have the ability to absorb lessons faster than seniors, so this is to say that kids have the potential to be the modified edition of someone old mistakes. On the other hand, there is a consensus that wants to divert its focus and energy towards seniors and this is due to the fact that they have an abundance of experience. Eventually, older citizens will have passed their experiences to the younger generation. For instance, the main source for stories, tales, and myths came from our previous generation. Not to mention, some have the value that says treat people the way you want to be treated, so people strive to give care to these seniors. In fact, by doing this conduct they illustrate an epitome for today youth. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, it is my opinion that older people have substantial value than offspring and we should give them special care. This is because of their accumulated experiences and expresses a positive model for the changed generation. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport, while other people think that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words. Anwser: Some individuals commented that stamina is the most relevant to a sportsman or sportswomen to be well-succeed in games. However, others believe that intelligence confidence is the most pivotal. Personally, I advocate the second opposing the initial since mental confidence overcomes challengers of diverse order. Although the body strength plays its role. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, intellectual thinking defines the athlete. In other words, this skill is behind the other possible players' capabilities. For instance, even if a footballer is heavy, if he is stripped from abilities to think swiftly to dominate his opponent, he soon loses the ball possession. As a result, his football team never gain the match, which means he as a sporter fails. Furthermore, the most famous world players on the planet are because of their intellectual abilities, and not their strong bodies. On the other hand, stamina balances a competitor. Because every sport needs movement, it is relevant to be strong for sake of offset. The recent research carried out by the UK football confederation pointed out that the overwhelming majority of professional clubs like Manchester United , Barcelona, and Real Madrid prefer football players with a high level of stamina due to their stability during the match for example. Hence, the extremely tight selection is made to hire a professional these days. To sum up, notwithstanding physical strength to be crucial to some game aspects, intelligence capability is the one that defines a successful rookie. Therefore, I still advocate it. I would go as far as to say, coaches worldwide should look more in highbrowed sporters rather than strong. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport, while other people think that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words. Anwser: Some individuals commented that stamina is the most relevant to a sportsman or sportswomen to be well-succeed in games. However, others believe that intelligence confidence is the most pivotal. Personally, I advocate the second opposing the initial since mental confidence overcomes challengers of diverse order. Although the body strength plays its role. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, intellectual thinking defines the athlete. In other words, this skill is behind the other possible players' capabilities. For instance, even if a footballer is heavy, if he is stripped from abilities to think swiftly to dominate his opponent, he soon loses the ball possession. As a result, his football team never gain the match, which means he as a sporter fails. Furthermore, the most famous world players on the planet are because of their intellectual abilities, and not their strong bodies. On the other hand, stamina balances a competitor. Because every sport needs movement, it is relevant to be strong for sake of offset. The recent research carried out by the UK football confederation pointed out that the overwhelming majority of professional clubs like Manchester United , Barcelona, and Real Madrid prefer football players with a high level of stamina due to their stability during the match for example. Hence, the extremely tight selection is made to hire a professional these days. To sum up, notwithstanding physical strength to be crucial to some game aspects, intelligence capability is the one that defines a successful rookie. Therefore, I still advocate it. I would go as far as to say, coaches worldwide should look more in highbrowed sporters rather than strong. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport, while other people think that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words. Anwser: Some individuals commented that stamina is the most relevant to a sportsman or sportswomen to be well-succeed in games. However, others believe that intelligence confidence is the most pivotal. Personally, I advocate the second opposing the initial since mental confidence overcomes challengers of diverse order. Although the body strength plays its role. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, intellectual thinking defines the athlete. In other words, this skill is behind the other possible players' capabilities. For instance, even if a footballer is heavy, if he is stripped from abilities to think swiftly to dominate his opponent, he soon loses the ball possession. As a result, his football team never gain the match, which means he as a sporter fails. Furthermore, the most famous world players on the planet are because of their intellectual abilities, and not their strong bodies. On the other hand, stamina balances a competitor. Because every sport needs movement, it is relevant to be strong for sake of offset. The recent research carried out by the UK football confederation pointed out that the overwhelming majority of professional clubs like Manchester United , Barcelona, and Real Madrid prefer football players with a high level of stamina due to their stability during the match for example. Hence, the extremely tight selection is made to hire a professional these days. To sum up, notwithstanding physical strength to be crucial to some game aspects, intelligence capability is the one that defines a successful rookie. Therefore, I still advocate it. I would go as far as to say, coaches worldwide should look more in highbrowed sporters rather than strong. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport, while other people think that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words. Anwser: Some individuals commented that stamina is the most relevant to a sportsman or sportswomen to be well-succeed in games. However, others believe that intelligence confidence is the most pivotal. Personally, I advocate the second opposing the initial since mental confidence overcomes challengers of diverse order. Although the body strength plays its role. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, intellectual thinking defines the athlete. In other words, this skill is behind the other possible players' capabilities. For instance, even if a footballer is heavy, if he is stripped from abilities to think swiftly to dominate his opponent, he soon loses the ball possession. As a result, his football team never gain the match, which means he as a sporter fails. Furthermore, the most famous world players on the planet are because of their intellectual abilities, and not their strong bodies. On the other hand, stamina balances a competitor. Because every sport needs movement, it is relevant to be strong for sake of offset. The recent research carried out by the UK football confederation pointed out that the overwhelming majority of professional clubs like Manchester United , Barcelona, and Real Madrid prefer football players with a high level of stamina due to their stability during the match for example. Hence, the extremely tight selection is made to hire a professional these days. To sum up, notwithstanding physical strength to be crucial to some game aspects, intelligence capability is the one that defines a successful rookie. Therefore, I still advocate it. I would go as far as to say, coaches worldwide should look more in highbrowed sporters rather than strong. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. others, However believe that school is the place to learn this discuss both the views and give your opinion. Anwser: Some individuals commented that relatives should train Boys and Girls to become better communities members. However, others argue that educational institutions are the most appropriate to that. Personally, I advocated the first view opposing to the second since collateral gives the initial educational step to youngsters, while schools provide solely scientific knowledge. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, parents teach social values to teenagers. In other words, relatives provide the starting societal orientation to youngsters such as loyalty, honesty, and especially how to behave in a community. For instance, the recent research carried out by the University of Exeter pointed out that 70% of Boys and Girls who were well-succeeded in their pursuits had parental role mode in earlier stages of their life. As a result, societies gain valued members aimed at its development. Furthermore, it is the prime reason for well-behaved children in many developed nations because they received advice before starting primary school. On the other hand, teaching departments lecturer science to young people. Because of nature and its orientation programmes, these organizations solely focus on providing scientific knowledge in areas like mathematic, history and geography. The overwhelming majority of the teaching organizations train their students in science throughout the earth, it is reported by the guardian magazine for example. Hence, students come out with a high scientific knowledge rather than gregarious ones. In conclusion, indeed, it is perceived that maternal should not let civil values as the responsibility to the educational hall since they are concentrated more on the dissemination of teenagers skills in math and history. Therefore, I still advocate progenitress accountability to make their youngsters be better society elements. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. others, However believe that school is the place to learn this discuss both the views and give your opinion. Anwser: Some individuals commented that relatives should train Boys and Girls to become better communities members. However, others argue that educational institutions are the most appropriate to that. Personally, I advocated the first view opposing to the second since collateral gives the initial educational step to youngsters, while schools provide solely scientific knowledge. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, parents teach social values to teenagers. In other words, relatives provide the starting societal orientation to youngsters such as loyalty, honesty, and especially how to behave in a community. For instance, the recent research carried out by the University of Exeter pointed out that 70% of Boys and Girls who were well-succeeded in their pursuits had parental role mode in earlier stages of their life. As a result, societies gain valued members aimed at its development. Furthermore, it is the prime reason for well-behaved children in many developed nations because they received advice before starting primary school. On the other hand, teaching departments lecturer science to young people. Because of nature and its orientation programmes, these organizations solely focus on providing scientific knowledge in areas like mathematic, history and geography. The overwhelming majority of the teaching organizations train their students in science throughout the earth, it is reported by the guardian magazine for example. Hence, students come out with a high scientific knowledge rather than gregarious ones. In conclusion, indeed, it is perceived that maternal should not let civil values as the responsibility to the educational hall since they are concentrated more on the dissemination of teenagers skills in math and history. Therefore, I still advocate progenitress accountability to make their youngsters be better society elements. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. others, However believe that school is the place to learn this discuss both the views and give your opinion. Anwser: Some individuals commented that relatives should train Boys and Girls to become better communities members. However, others argue that educational institutions are the most appropriate to that. Personally, I advocated the first view opposing to the second since collateral gives the initial educational step to youngsters, while schools provide solely scientific knowledge. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, parents teach social values to teenagers. In other words, relatives provide the starting societal orientation to youngsters such as loyalty, honesty, and especially how to behave in a community. For instance, the recent research carried out by the University of Exeter pointed out that 70% of Boys and Girls who were well-succeeded in their pursuits had parental role mode in earlier stages of their life. As a result, societies gain valued members aimed at its development. Furthermore, it is the prime reason for well-behaved children in many developed nations because they received advice before starting primary school. On the other hand, teaching departments lecturer science to young people. Because of nature and its orientation programmes, these organizations solely focus on providing scientific knowledge in areas like mathematic, history and geography. The overwhelming majority of the teaching organizations train their students in science throughout the earth, it is reported by the guardian magazine for example. Hence, students come out with a high scientific knowledge rather than gregarious ones. In conclusion, indeed, it is perceived that maternal should not let civil values as the responsibility to the educational hall since they are concentrated more on the dissemination of teenagers skills in math and history. Therefore, I still advocate progenitress accountability to make their youngsters be better society elements. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. others, However believe that school is the place to learn this discuss both the views and give your opinion. Anwser: Some individuals commented that relatives should train Boys and Girls to become better communities members. However, others argue that educational institutions are the most appropriate to that. Personally, I advocated the first view opposing to the second since collateral gives the initial educational step to youngsters, while schools provide solely scientific knowledge. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, parents teach social values to teenagers. In other words, relatives provide the starting societal orientation to youngsters such as loyalty, honesty, and especially how to behave in a community. For instance, the recent research carried out by the University of Exeter pointed out that 70% of Boys and Girls who were well-succeeded in their pursuits had parental role mode in earlier stages of their life. As a result, societies gain valued members aimed at its development. Furthermore, it is the prime reason for well-behaved children in many developed nations because they received advice before starting primary school. On the other hand, teaching departments lecturer science to young people. Because of nature and its orientation programmes, these organizations solely focus on providing scientific knowledge in areas like mathematic, history and geography. The overwhelming majority of the teaching organizations train their students in science throughout the earth, it is reported by the guardian magazine for example. Hence, students come out with a high scientific knowledge rather than gregarious ones. In conclusion, indeed, it is perceived that maternal should not let civil values as the responsibility to the educational hall since they are concentrated more on the dissemination of teenagers skills in math and history. Therefore, I still advocate progenitress accountability to make their youngsters be better society elements. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: There is too much noise in many public places in cities. What are the causes of this problem? What can be done to solve the problem? Anwser: Many public places in urban areas, these days, are getting too noisy. This essay will be discussing some factors and some measures that should be taken to solve the issue. One of the first problems of why big cities in many areas are becoming noisy is that the number of people who employ private vehicles is increasing. The sounds of engines and clack sounds of the automobile are overused. As a result, this produces too much noise in the environment. For example, in New York City, the USA, most people do not take public transport, they use their own cars instead. Thus, the noises of their automobile are making too much noise which is considered annoying for some citizens. A possible solution to this problem would be to take public transports for the local citizens if they want to commute from one place to another. This is believed effective to reduce the amount of noise generated by private cars as they are taking the public commuters. For instance, in Japan, the public is required to utilise public transport to move from one place to another. This is clearly potent in deducting the noise in cities. Consequently, the cities are freed from too loud noises. In conclusion, too much noise in ample public premises in urban regions is owing to some issues, one of which is too many private transports used by the local communities. Therefore, a possible solution that needs to be done is by taking public transports to go from one place to another. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: There is too much noise in many public places in cities. What are the causes of this problem? What can be done to solve the problem? Anwser: Many public places in urban areas, these days, are getting too noisy. This essay will be discussing some factors and some measures that should be taken to solve the issue. One of the first problems of why big cities in many areas are becoming noisy is that the number of people who employ private vehicles is increasing. The sounds of engines and clack sounds of the automobile are overused. As a result, this produces too much noise in the environment. For example, in New York City, the USA, most people do not take public transport, they use their own cars instead. Thus, the noises of their automobile are making too much noise which is considered annoying for some citizens. A possible solution to this problem would be to take public transports for the local citizens if they want to commute from one place to another. This is believed effective to reduce the amount of noise generated by private cars as they are taking the public commuters. For instance, in Japan, the public is required to utilise public transport to move from one place to another. This is clearly potent in deducting the noise in cities. Consequently, the cities are freed from too loud noises. In conclusion, too much noise in ample public premises in urban regions is owing to some issues, one of which is too many private transports used by the local communities. Therefore, a possible solution that needs to be done is by taking public transports to go from one place to another. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: There is too much noise in many public places in cities. What are the causes of this problem? What can be done to solve the problem? Anwser: Many public places in urban areas, these days, are getting too noisy. This essay will be discussing some factors and some measures that should be taken to solve the issue. One of the first problems of why big cities in many areas are becoming noisy is that the number of people who employ private vehicles is increasing. The sounds of engines and clack sounds of the automobile are overused. As a result, this produces too much noise in the environment. For example, in New York City, the USA, most people do not take public transport, they use their own cars instead. Thus, the noises of their automobile are making too much noise which is considered annoying for some citizens. A possible solution to this problem would be to take public transports for the local citizens if they want to commute from one place to another. This is believed effective to reduce the amount of noise generated by private cars as they are taking the public commuters. For instance, in Japan, the public is required to utilise public transport to move from one place to another. This is clearly potent in deducting the noise in cities. Consequently, the cities are freed from too loud noises. In conclusion, too much noise in ample public premises in urban regions is owing to some issues, one of which is too many private transports used by the local communities. Therefore, a possible solution that needs to be done is by taking public transports to go from one place to another. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: There is too much noise in many public places in cities. What are the causes of this problem? What can be done to solve the problem? Anwser: Many public places in urban areas, these days, are getting too noisy. This essay will be discussing some factors and some measures that should be taken to solve the issue. One of the first problems of why big cities in many areas are becoming noisy is that the number of people who employ private vehicles is increasing. The sounds of engines and clack sounds of the automobile are overused. As a result, this produces too much noise in the environment. For example, in New York City, the USA, most people do not take public transport, they use their own cars instead. Thus, the noises of their automobile are making too much noise which is considered annoying for some citizens. A possible solution to this problem would be to take public transports for the local citizens if they want to commute from one place to another. This is believed effective to reduce the amount of noise generated by private cars as they are taking the public commuters. For instance, in Japan, the public is required to utilise public transport to move from one place to another. This is clearly potent in deducting the noise in cities. Consequently, the cities are freed from too loud noises. In conclusion, too much noise in ample public premises in urban regions is owing to some issues, one of which is too many private transports used by the local communities. Therefore, a possible solution that needs to be done is by taking public transports to go from one place to another. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Travelling in group with a tour guide is the best way to travel. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: The vast majority of the population deems that a presence of a tour guide is composed of a necessary part throughout the tour destination while others argue with this position and claim that visitors can be travelled independently. I advocate strongly with these statements and am going to reflect on this essay my own view of such a common issue and to discuss both opinions. On the one hand, it can be inferred that a large number of the population is right. First of all, a more detailed look at this trouble affords the population to conclude the core benefits of tour guides. For instance, the qualified person knows a substantial total of the information about the local environment and he can be so useful assistant during the trip. Secondly, staffers of various tour agencies possess special knowledge of a place, where they perform their duties. Hence, tour guides may help people in various situations, which tourists often encounter. On the other hand, it can be spotted that the population embark to travel without tour groups. Likewise, visitors often organise routes themselves, especially to remote places. In addition, tourists admit that a travel agency provides very expensive trips and some people do not have the possibility to make a purchase of them. However, destinations, which are organised by agencies, are more informative and fascinating in contrast to individual trips. Consequently, some visitors continue to choose companies for travellings. To summarise, I would stress that tour groups have both positive and negative sides. I support definitely with this statement and my arguments confirm it. Nevertheless, tourists must decide upon for themselves what is the best way to travel. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Travelling in group with a tour guide is the best way to travel. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: The vast majority of the population deems that a presence of a tour guide is composed of a necessary part throughout the tour destination while others argue with this position and claim that visitors can be travelled independently. I advocate strongly with these statements and am going to reflect on this essay my own view of such a common issue and to discuss both opinions. On the one hand, it can be inferred that a large number of the population is right. First of all, a more detailed look at this trouble affords the population to conclude the core benefits of tour guides. For instance, the qualified person knows a substantial total of the information about the local environment and he can be so useful assistant during the trip. Secondly, staffers of various tour agencies possess special knowledge of a place, where they perform their duties. Hence, tour guides may help people in various situations, which tourists often encounter. On the other hand, it can be spotted that the population embark to travel without tour groups. Likewise, visitors often organise routes themselves, especially to remote places. In addition, tourists admit that a travel agency provides very expensive trips and some people do not have the possibility to make a purchase of them. However, destinations, which are organised by agencies, are more informative and fascinating in contrast to individual trips. Consequently, some visitors continue to choose companies for travellings. To summarise, I would stress that tour groups have both positive and negative sides. I support definitely with this statement and my arguments confirm it. Nevertheless, tourists must decide upon for themselves what is the best way to travel. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Travelling in group with a tour guide is the best way to travel. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: The vast majority of the population deems that a presence of a tour guide is composed of a necessary part throughout the tour destination while others argue with this position and claim that visitors can be travelled independently. I advocate strongly with these statements and am going to reflect on this essay my own view of such a common issue and to discuss both opinions. On the one hand, it can be inferred that a large number of the population is right. First of all, a more detailed look at this trouble affords the population to conclude the core benefits of tour guides. For instance, the qualified person knows a substantial total of the information about the local environment and he can be so useful assistant during the trip. Secondly, staffers of various tour agencies possess special knowledge of a place, where they perform their duties. Hence, tour guides may help people in various situations, which tourists often encounter. On the other hand, it can be spotted that the population embark to travel without tour groups. Likewise, visitors often organise routes themselves, especially to remote places. In addition, tourists admit that a travel agency provides very expensive trips and some people do not have the possibility to make a purchase of them. However, destinations, which are organised by agencies, are more informative and fascinating in contrast to individual trips. Consequently, some visitors continue to choose companies for travellings. To summarise, I would stress that tour groups have both positive and negative sides. I support definitely with this statement and my arguments confirm it. Nevertheless, tourists must decide upon for themselves what is the best way to travel. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Travelling in group with a tour guide is the best way to travel. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: The vast majority of the population deems that a presence of a tour guide is composed of a necessary part throughout the tour destination while others argue with this position and claim that visitors can be travelled independently. I advocate strongly with these statements and am going to reflect on this essay my own view of such a common issue and to discuss both opinions. On the one hand, it can be inferred that a large number of the population is right. First of all, a more detailed look at this trouble affords the population to conclude the core benefits of tour guides. For instance, the qualified person knows a substantial total of the information about the local environment and he can be so useful assistant during the trip. Secondly, staffers of various tour agencies possess special knowledge of a place, where they perform their duties. Hence, tour guides may help people in various situations, which tourists often encounter. On the other hand, it can be spotted that the population embark to travel without tour groups. Likewise, visitors often organise routes themselves, especially to remote places. In addition, tourists admit that a travel agency provides very expensive trips and some people do not have the possibility to make a purchase of them. However, destinations, which are organised by agencies, are more informative and fascinating in contrast to individual trips. Consequently, some visitors continue to choose companies for travellings. To summarise, I would stress that tour groups have both positive and negative sides. I support definitely with this statement and my arguments confirm it. Nevertheless, tourists must decide upon for themselves what is the best way to travel. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. Anwser: The majority of the masses choose to wake up before the usual time and begin the daily work. While others adopt to get up late opportunity in the day and be at work until midnight. In my opinion, I opt for the regular working hours as it is beneficial to strength and wealth. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view. On the one hand, the prevailing habits from many years followed traditionally. Although a portion of people had been following to wake up early in early hours from the bed, intending to markup their day's activities. As a result, it produces a plethora of well-being benefits. Besides that, they are always active for the remaining day as had enough sleep for the day during normal hours. For example, in the rural areas, usually, formers wake up at 5 am in the morning, preparing food for lunchtime. Moreover, they will be doing forming the corp during the sunlight, thus, formers having D Vitamin naturally without spending money. On the other hand, traditional cultures have been ruled out by the current generation as living in the digital world. In order to, young people spend a vast amount of time at midnight, which causes sleeping disorders to intend to sleep over midnight. Consequently, getting up from bed at mid-day, it affecting their fitness, daily meeting schedules. Therefore, sometimes they are sick without a valid reason. For instance, a recent survey conducted by the Directory of health on people sleeping patterns, report says who had followed the sleep regular times, are hospitalization ratio quite lower than those who aren't. In addition, earning more profits in a year without spending on inevitable expenses. In conclusion, it was proven that lack of sleep causes illness to the well-being, sometimes it would lead to death. Finally, maintaining a proper healthy diet leads to stronger and strengthy life. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. Anwser: The majority of the masses choose to wake up before the usual time and begin the daily work. While others adopt to get up late opportunity in the day and be at work until midnight. In my opinion, I opt for the regular working hours as it is beneficial to strength and wealth. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view. On the one hand, the prevailing habits from many years followed traditionally. Although a portion of people had been following to wake up early in early hours from the bed, intending to markup their day's activities. As a result, it produces a plethora of well-being benefits. Besides that, they are always active for the remaining day as had enough sleep for the day during normal hours. For example, in the rural areas, usually, formers wake up at 5 am in the morning, preparing food for lunchtime. Moreover, they will be doing forming the corp during the sunlight, thus, formers having D Vitamin naturally without spending money. On the other hand, traditional cultures have been ruled out by the current generation as living in the digital world. In order to, young people spend a vast amount of time at midnight, which causes sleeping disorders to intend to sleep over midnight. Consequently, getting up from bed at mid-day, it affecting their fitness, daily meeting schedules. Therefore, sometimes they are sick without a valid reason. For instance, a recent survey conducted by the Directory of health on people sleeping patterns, report says who had followed the sleep regular times, are hospitalization ratio quite lower than those who aren't. In addition, earning more profits in a year without spending on inevitable expenses. In conclusion, it was proven that lack of sleep causes illness to the well-being, sometimes it would lead to death. Finally, maintaining a proper healthy diet leads to stronger and strengthy life. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. Anwser: The majority of the masses choose to wake up before the usual time and begin the daily work. While others adopt to get up late opportunity in the day and be at work until midnight. In my opinion, I opt for the regular working hours as it is beneficial to strength and wealth. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view. On the one hand, the prevailing habits from many years followed traditionally. Although a portion of people had been following to wake up early in early hours from the bed, intending to markup their day's activities. As a result, it produces a plethora of well-being benefits. Besides that, they are always active for the remaining day as had enough sleep for the day during normal hours. For example, in the rural areas, usually, formers wake up at 5 am in the morning, preparing food for lunchtime. Moreover, they will be doing forming the corp during the sunlight, thus, formers having D Vitamin naturally without spending money. On the other hand, traditional cultures have been ruled out by the current generation as living in the digital world. In order to, young people spend a vast amount of time at midnight, which causes sleeping disorders to intend to sleep over midnight. Consequently, getting up from bed at mid-day, it affecting their fitness, daily meeting schedules. Therefore, sometimes they are sick without a valid reason. For instance, a recent survey conducted by the Directory of health on people sleeping patterns, report says who had followed the sleep regular times, are hospitalization ratio quite lower than those who aren't. In addition, earning more profits in a year without spending on inevitable expenses. In conclusion, it was proven that lack of sleep causes illness to the well-being, sometimes it would lead to death. Finally, maintaining a proper healthy diet leads to stronger and strengthy life. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. Anwser: The majority of the masses choose to wake up before the usual time and begin the daily work. While others adopt to get up late opportunity in the day and be at work until midnight. In my opinion, I opt for the regular working hours as it is beneficial to strength and wealth. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view. On the one hand, the prevailing habits from many years followed traditionally. Although a portion of people had been following to wake up early in early hours from the bed, intending to markup their day's activities. As a result, it produces a plethora of well-being benefits. Besides that, they are always active for the remaining day as had enough sleep for the day during normal hours. For example, in the rural areas, usually, formers wake up at 5 am in the morning, preparing food for lunchtime. Moreover, they will be doing forming the corp during the sunlight, thus, formers having D Vitamin naturally without spending money. On the other hand, traditional cultures have been ruled out by the current generation as living in the digital world. In order to, young people spend a vast amount of time at midnight, which causes sleeping disorders to intend to sleep over midnight. Consequently, getting up from bed at mid-day, it affecting their fitness, daily meeting schedules. Therefore, sometimes they are sick without a valid reason. For instance, a recent survey conducted by the Directory of health on people sleeping patterns, report says who had followed the sleep regular times, are hospitalization ratio quite lower than those who aren't. In addition, earning more profits in a year without spending on inevitable expenses. In conclusion, it was proven that lack of sleep causes illness to the well-being, sometimes it would lead to death. Finally, maintaining a proper healthy diet leads to stronger and strengthy life. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree? You should write at least 254 words. Anwser: Nowadays multinational companies hire an enormous quantity of staff to work and to enhance their economical boundaries. Some people argue that if employees who work for large organizations and factories must shift to the countryside so that the traffic and housing problems must be resolved. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the above statement because these citizens would waste their precious time while commuting to the office. First of all, employees who are not yet married should start sharing the house with their colleagues so that there will be empty houses for other public. Moreover, they would be able to save money on a larger quantity for their future years. For instance, under serious medical conditions if the patient leaves in the countryside, so a lot of time will undergo to reach the hospital. Even though they have to stay in smaller houses, they will be safe. In addition, government authorities must pressurize the folk to utilize public transport rather than the private vehicle. Furthermore, there would be less number of vehicles on the road and it would lead to less traffic. For example, workers avoid staying in the countryside because they feel it is dangerous to travel at night. Thus, the public must follow the norms set by the higher authorities to avoid congestion while travelling. To summarise,employees who don't want to share their personal space with anyone must prioritize leaving in the village areas. It is completely incorrect to shift the workers away from the city because of travelling and housing problems instead the government should initiate some steps to align these issues. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree? You should write at least 254 words. Anwser: Nowadays multinational companies hire an enormous quantity of staff to work and to enhance their economical boundaries. Some people argue that if employees who work for large organizations and factories must shift to the countryside so that the traffic and housing problems must be resolved. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the above statement because these citizens would waste their precious time while commuting to the office. First of all, employees who are not yet married should start sharing the house with their colleagues so that there will be empty houses for other public. Moreover, they would be able to save money on a larger quantity for their future years. For instance, under serious medical conditions if the patient leaves in the countryside, so a lot of time will undergo to reach the hospital. Even though they have to stay in smaller houses, they will be safe. In addition, government authorities must pressurize the folk to utilize public transport rather than the private vehicle. Furthermore, there would be less number of vehicles on the road and it would lead to less traffic. For example, workers avoid staying in the countryside because they feel it is dangerous to travel at night. Thus, the public must follow the norms set by the higher authorities to avoid congestion while travelling. To summarise,employees who don't want to share their personal space with anyone must prioritize leaving in the village areas. It is completely incorrect to shift the workers away from the city because of travelling and housing problems instead the government should initiate some steps to align these issues. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree? You should write at least 254 words. Anwser: Nowadays multinational companies hire an enormous quantity of staff to work and to enhance their economical boundaries. Some people argue that if employees who work for large organizations and factories must shift to the countryside so that the traffic and housing problems must be resolved. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the above statement because these citizens would waste their precious time while commuting to the office. First of all, employees who are not yet married should start sharing the house with their colleagues so that there will be empty houses for other public. Moreover, they would be able to save money on a larger quantity for their future years. For instance, under serious medical conditions if the patient leaves in the countryside, so a lot of time will undergo to reach the hospital. Even though they have to stay in smaller houses, they will be safe. In addition, government authorities must pressurize the folk to utilize public transport rather than the private vehicle. Furthermore, there would be less number of vehicles on the road and it would lead to less traffic. For example, workers avoid staying in the countryside because they feel it is dangerous to travel at night. Thus, the public must follow the norms set by the higher authorities to avoid congestion while travelling. To summarise,employees who don't want to share their personal space with anyone must prioritize leaving in the village areas. It is completely incorrect to shift the workers away from the city because of travelling and housing problems instead the government should initiate some steps to align these issues. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree? You should write at least 254 words. Anwser: Nowadays multinational companies hire an enormous quantity of staff to work and to enhance their economical boundaries. Some people argue that if employees who work for large organizations and factories must shift to the countryside so that the traffic and housing problems must be resolved. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the above statement because these citizens would waste their precious time while commuting to the office. First of all, employees who are not yet married should start sharing the house with their colleagues so that there will be empty houses for other public. Moreover, they would be able to save money on a larger quantity for their future years. For instance, under serious medical conditions if the patient leaves in the countryside, so a lot of time will undergo to reach the hospital. Even though they have to stay in smaller houses, they will be safe. In addition, government authorities must pressurize the folk to utilize public transport rather than the private vehicle. Furthermore, there would be less number of vehicles on the road and it would lead to less traffic. For example, workers avoid staying in the countryside because they feel it is dangerous to travel at night. Thus, the public must follow the norms set by the higher authorities to avoid congestion while travelling. To summarise,employees who don't want to share their personal space with anyone must prioritize leaving in the village areas. It is completely incorrect to shift the workers away from the city because of travelling and housing problems instead the government should initiate some steps to align these issues. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: There is a debate whether offspring should be given the space to commit mistakes, while others think that families should not allow their offspring to commit mistakes. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument, and then I will give my opinion. On one hand, there is a consensus that disagrees with the statement that minors should be given the space to commit issues. Thus families must create a controlled environment at home. This is to say, that young adults did not arrive at that level of maturity that allows them to realise what they are doing. For instance, children might commit a fatal flew that might destroy their future like killing someone by car mistakenly. Moreover, this behaviour might affect other youth where a kid might be influenced by other kids. Hence, this might promote this conduct. On the other hand, there is the side that advocates the notion of giving their offspring the right to do whatever they want. Furthermore, humans are learner creatures and they are driven by curiosity and this fact applies to children. Therefore, the more mistake they have, the more experience they gain. Eventually, minors will have accumulated experiences that would qualify them to deal with life. In fact, in this era experiences became extremely valuable. For example, these days companies strive to attract applicants who have any type of experience like life experience, technical experience, etc. This is because these experiences will add value to the company. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, I strongly agree with the consensus that believes that children should be given the freedom to do mistakes. From my point of view, I extremely believe that life is all about experience and to get that we have to gain it committing mistakes. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: There is a debate whether offspring should be given the space to commit mistakes, while others think that families should not allow their offspring to commit mistakes. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument, and then I will give my opinion. On one hand, there is a consensus that disagrees with the statement that minors should be given the space to commit issues. Thus families must create a controlled environment at home. This is to say, that young adults did not arrive at that level of maturity that allows them to realise what they are doing. For instance, children might commit a fatal flew that might destroy their future like killing someone by car mistakenly. Moreover, this behaviour might affect other youth where a kid might be influenced by other kids. Hence, this might promote this conduct. On the other hand, there is the side that advocates the notion of giving their offspring the right to do whatever they want. Furthermore, humans are learner creatures and they are driven by curiosity and this fact applies to children. Therefore, the more mistake they have, the more experience they gain. Eventually, minors will have accumulated experiences that would qualify them to deal with life. In fact, in this era experiences became extremely valuable. For example, these days companies strive to attract applicants who have any type of experience like life experience, technical experience, etc. This is because these experiences will add value to the company. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, I strongly agree with the consensus that believes that children should be given the freedom to do mistakes. From my point of view, I extremely believe that life is all about experience and to get that we have to gain it committing mistakes. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: There is a debate whether offspring should be given the space to commit mistakes, while others think that families should not allow their offspring to commit mistakes. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument, and then I will give my opinion. On one hand, there is a consensus that disagrees with the statement that minors should be given the space to commit issues. Thus families must create a controlled environment at home. This is to say, that young adults did not arrive at that level of maturity that allows them to realise what they are doing. For instance, children might commit a fatal flew that might destroy their future like killing someone by car mistakenly. Moreover, this behaviour might affect other youth where a kid might be influenced by other kids. Hence, this might promote this conduct. On the other hand, there is the side that advocates the notion of giving their offspring the right to do whatever they want. Furthermore, humans are learner creatures and they are driven by curiosity and this fact applies to children. Therefore, the more mistake they have, the more experience they gain. Eventually, minors will have accumulated experiences that would qualify them to deal with life. In fact, in this era experiences became extremely valuable. For example, these days companies strive to attract applicants who have any type of experience like life experience, technical experience, etc. This is because these experiences will add value to the company. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, I strongly agree with the consensus that believes that children should be given the freedom to do mistakes. From my point of view, I extremely believe that life is all about experience and to get that we have to gain it committing mistakes. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: There is a debate whether offspring should be given the space to commit mistakes, while others think that families should not allow their offspring to commit mistakes. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument, and then I will give my opinion. On one hand, there is a consensus that disagrees with the statement that minors should be given the space to commit issues. Thus families must create a controlled environment at home. This is to say, that young adults did not arrive at that level of maturity that allows them to realise what they are doing. For instance, children might commit a fatal flew that might destroy their future like killing someone by car mistakenly. Moreover, this behaviour might affect other youth where a kid might be influenced by other kids. Hence, this might promote this conduct. On the other hand, there is the side that advocates the notion of giving their offspring the right to do whatever they want. Furthermore, humans are learner creatures and they are driven by curiosity and this fact applies to children. Therefore, the more mistake they have, the more experience they gain. Eventually, minors will have accumulated experiences that would qualify them to deal with life. In fact, in this era experiences became extremely valuable. For example, these days companies strive to attract applicants who have any type of experience like life experience, technical experience, etc. This is because these experiences will add value to the company. In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance, however, I strongly agree with the consensus that believes that children should be given the freedom to do mistakes. From my point of view, I extremely believe that life is all about experience and to get that we have to gain it committing mistakes. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only managers should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should also be involved in the process of decision-making . Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The decisions should be made by only supervisors or executives, according to some people. Other people, nevertheless, opine that everyone in a company should be involved in making these things. In my opinion, all members should decide on their own jobs. Both sides along with my perspectives linked to the topic will be outlined in the following paragraphs. There are many arguments in favour of all action should be taken by managers. The most important one is that most managers are graduated with a master degree or bachelor degree. There is a universal consensus that almost all universities are more likely to teach their students to know more about the various aspects of business such as finance, marketing, operation, and countless business fields. Additionally, most supervisors are trained to make difficult stuff with the best outcome. As a result, they are opted to set the company goals. For example, most higher-rank employees, including Tim Cook, who graduated from an MBA program tend to head the club's long-term goal . There are, however, a host of arguments put forward against all decisions based on only the executive team. First and foremost, one significant counterargument is that operators always understand the detail of their shop-floor jobs more than their bosses do. Without a doubt, most employees can sometimes give invaluable ideas to make a better party's decision. Without the involvement of every employee, the group hardly can move forward. Consequently, Chief Executive Officer should encourage all members to involve in the process of decision-making. An outstanding example would be that startup companies allow all staff to find the common goals that everyone will achieve. To sum up, even though making company's way by higher-rank staffs has various reasons, I am of the opinion that everyone should be involved in the process. Unless only executive teams decide everything, it is more likely that the growth of the community will increase insignificantly. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only managers should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should also be involved in the process of decision-making . Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The decisions should be made by only supervisors or executives, according to some people. Other people, nevertheless, opine that everyone in a company should be involved in making these things. In my opinion, all members should decide on their own jobs. Both sides along with my perspectives linked to the topic will be outlined in the following paragraphs. There are many arguments in favour of all action should be taken by managers. The most important one is that most managers are graduated with a master degree or bachelor degree. There is a universal consensus that almost all universities are more likely to teach their students to know more about the various aspects of business such as finance, marketing, operation, and countless business fields. Additionally, most supervisors are trained to make difficult stuff with the best outcome. As a result, they are opted to set the company goals. For example, most higher-rank employees, including Tim Cook, who graduated from an MBA program tend to head the club's long-term goal . There are, however, a host of arguments put forward against all decisions based on only the executive team. First and foremost, one significant counterargument is that operators always understand the detail of their shop-floor jobs more than their bosses do. Without a doubt, most employees can sometimes give invaluable ideas to make a better party's decision. Without the involvement of every employee, the group hardly can move forward. Consequently, Chief Executive Officer should encourage all members to involve in the process of decision-making. An outstanding example would be that startup companies allow all staff to find the common goals that everyone will achieve. To sum up, even though making company's way by higher-rank staffs has various reasons, I am of the opinion that everyone should be involved in the process. Unless only executive teams decide everything, it is more likely that the growth of the community will increase insignificantly. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only managers should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should also be involved in the process of decision-making . Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The decisions should be made by only supervisors or executives, according to some people. Other people, nevertheless, opine that everyone in a company should be involved in making these things. In my opinion, all members should decide on their own jobs. Both sides along with my perspectives linked to the topic will be outlined in the following paragraphs. There are many arguments in favour of all action should be taken by managers. The most important one is that most managers are graduated with a master degree or bachelor degree. There is a universal consensus that almost all universities are more likely to teach their students to know more about the various aspects of business such as finance, marketing, operation, and countless business fields. Additionally, most supervisors are trained to make difficult stuff with the best outcome. As a result, they are opted to set the company goals. For example, most higher-rank employees, including Tim Cook, who graduated from an MBA program tend to head the club's long-term goal . There are, however, a host of arguments put forward against all decisions based on only the executive team. First and foremost, one significant counterargument is that operators always understand the detail of their shop-floor jobs more than their bosses do. Without a doubt, most employees can sometimes give invaluable ideas to make a better party's decision. Without the involvement of every employee, the group hardly can move forward. Consequently, Chief Executive Officer should encourage all members to involve in the process of decision-making. An outstanding example would be that startup companies allow all staff to find the common goals that everyone will achieve. To sum up, even though making company's way by higher-rank staffs has various reasons, I am of the opinion that everyone should be involved in the process. Unless only executive teams decide everything, it is more likely that the growth of the community will increase insignificantly. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only managers should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should also be involved in the process of decision-making . Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The decisions should be made by only supervisors or executives, according to some people. Other people, nevertheless, opine that everyone in a company should be involved in making these things. In my opinion, all members should decide on their own jobs. Both sides along with my perspectives linked to the topic will be outlined in the following paragraphs. There are many arguments in favour of all action should be taken by managers. The most important one is that most managers are graduated with a master degree or bachelor degree. There is a universal consensus that almost all universities are more likely to teach their students to know more about the various aspects of business such as finance, marketing, operation, and countless business fields. Additionally, most supervisors are trained to make difficult stuff with the best outcome. As a result, they are opted to set the company goals. For example, most higher-rank employees, including Tim Cook, who graduated from an MBA program tend to head the club's long-term goal . There are, however, a host of arguments put forward against all decisions based on only the executive team. First and foremost, one significant counterargument is that operators always understand the detail of their shop-floor jobs more than their bosses do. Without a doubt, most employees can sometimes give invaluable ideas to make a better party's decision. Without the involvement of every employee, the group hardly can move forward. Consequently, Chief Executive Officer should encourage all members to involve in the process of decision-making. An outstanding example would be that startup companies allow all staff to find the common goals that everyone will achieve. To sum up, even though making company's way by higher-rank staffs has various reasons, I am of the opinion that everyone should be involved in the process. Unless only executive teams decide everything, it is more likely that the growth of the community will increase insignificantly. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree Anwser: Arguably, it is commented whether the world-ruling power should use public funds sensitizing and mobilizing citizens to avert sickness or it should allocate the same money to individuals cure. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since it is worthy of preventing rather than treating. Although a cure is less spending than prevention. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, Prevention glosses over severe illnesses. In other words, spending financial resources warning individuals has shown to be the efficient development to prevent diseases such as diarrhoea, malaria and coronavirus. For instance, if the world cabinet did not heavily disseminate protective measures to hinder the coronavirus pandemic many people could have died. As a result, more public funds could have been wasted on crowd treatment. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for a shrunk number of coronavirus pandemic deceased throughout the earth. On the other hand, a patient cure is less national money-consuming than averting. Because of the availability of medical drugs across the earth, healing folk into hospitals use fewer government resources. For example, solely in the first year of the actual pandemic, each Africa nation allocated a billion to purchase masks, soaps, and alcohol. However, solely a quarter of an equal amount was enough to care for those hospitalized. Hence, the spared money is allocated to other government priorities like education, roads and security. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks result in more investment to promote a healthy lifestyle, it avoids severe illness and medicinal internation, and especially it reduces the population death toll. Therefore I still strongly agree with the view. I recommend local authorities to allot more crowd taxes in mobilization. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree Anwser: Arguably, it is commented whether the world-ruling power should use public funds sensitizing and mobilizing citizens to avert sickness or it should allocate the same money to individuals cure. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since it is worthy of preventing rather than treating. Although a cure is less spending than prevention. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, Prevention glosses over severe illnesses. In other words, spending financial resources warning individuals has shown to be the efficient development to prevent diseases such as diarrhoea, malaria and coronavirus. For instance, if the world cabinet did not heavily disseminate protective measures to hinder the coronavirus pandemic many people could have died. As a result, more public funds could have been wasted on crowd treatment. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for a shrunk number of coronavirus pandemic deceased throughout the earth. On the other hand, a patient cure is less national money-consuming than averting. Because of the availability of medical drugs across the earth, healing folk into hospitals use fewer government resources. For example, solely in the first year of the actual pandemic, each Africa nation allocated a billion to purchase masks, soaps, and alcohol. However, solely a quarter of an equal amount was enough to care for those hospitalized. Hence, the spared money is allocated to other government priorities like education, roads and security. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks result in more investment to promote a healthy lifestyle, it avoids severe illness and medicinal internation, and especially it reduces the population death toll. Therefore I still strongly agree with the view. I recommend local authorities to allot more crowd taxes in mobilization. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree Anwser: Arguably, it is commented whether the world-ruling power should use public funds sensitizing and mobilizing citizens to avert sickness or it should allocate the same money to individuals cure. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since it is worthy of preventing rather than treating. Although a cure is less spending than prevention. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, Prevention glosses over severe illnesses. In other words, spending financial resources warning individuals has shown to be the efficient development to prevent diseases such as diarrhoea, malaria and coronavirus. For instance, if the world cabinet did not heavily disseminate protective measures to hinder the coronavirus pandemic many people could have died. As a result, more public funds could have been wasted on crowd treatment. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for a shrunk number of coronavirus pandemic deceased throughout the earth. On the other hand, a patient cure is less national money-consuming than averting. Because of the availability of medical drugs across the earth, healing folk into hospitals use fewer government resources. For example, solely in the first year of the actual pandemic, each Africa nation allocated a billion to purchase masks, soaps, and alcohol. However, solely a quarter of an equal amount was enough to care for those hospitalized. Hence, the spared money is allocated to other government priorities like education, roads and security. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks result in more investment to promote a healthy lifestyle, it avoids severe illness and medicinal internation, and especially it reduces the population death toll. Therefore I still strongly agree with the view. I recommend local authorities to allot more crowd taxes in mobilization. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree Anwser: Arguably, it is commented whether the world-ruling power should use public funds sensitizing and mobilizing citizens to avert sickness or it should allocate the same money to individuals cure. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since it is worthy of preventing rather than treating. Although a cure is less spending than prevention. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, Prevention glosses over severe illnesses. In other words, spending financial resources warning individuals has shown to be the efficient development to prevent diseases such as diarrhoea, malaria and coronavirus. For instance, if the world cabinet did not heavily disseminate protective measures to hinder the coronavirus pandemic many people could have died. As a result, more public funds could have been wasted on crowd treatment. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for a shrunk number of coronavirus pandemic deceased throughout the earth. On the other hand, a patient cure is less national money-consuming than averting. Because of the availability of medical drugs across the earth, healing folk into hospitals use fewer government resources. For example, solely in the first year of the actual pandemic, each Africa nation allocated a billion to purchase masks, soaps, and alcohol. However, solely a quarter of an equal amount was enough to care for those hospitalized. Hence, the spared money is allocated to other government priorities like education, roads and security. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks result in more investment to promote a healthy lifestyle, it avoids severe illness and medicinal internation, and especially it reduces the population death toll. Therefore I still strongly agree with the view. I recommend local authorities to allot more crowd taxes in mobilization. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: In the concurrent world, people can enjoy advanced technology and convenient internet. The folk can connect to a load of information, but they may not analyse whether it is correct or not. Also, we cannot deny that we do have lots of choices since we can easily access the cyber in our generation whereas our parents may not have these benefits in their generations. This essay is going to discuss both pons and cons and my own opinions. Firstly, since the 18 century, the factories had huge improvements. This can convey that the production can be rapidly increased. Additionally, those companies can devote themselves to inventing more kinds of products. As a result, we do have various choices. This can have several benefits. For example, we can pick a suitable restaurant before we actually eat. Although it might have a host of shops to choose from, we can google it before we get in. In addition, the community can make the right decision. Secondly, it may have unexpected consequences. The folk may be annoyed due to enormous patterns. Unlike the last few decades, they were living in an infertility world. Hence, they have no other alternative choice. However, we may be bothered by too many things since we living in a complicated society. It may eventually lead to mental health because of the anxieties on deciding such as insomnia. To conclude, I do think that it has its sunny sides. Yet, I think that the negatives are more than the positives due to the sickness behind them. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: In the concurrent world, people can enjoy advanced technology and convenient internet. The folk can connect to a load of information, but they may not analyse whether it is correct or not. Also, we cannot deny that we do have lots of choices since we can easily access the cyber in our generation whereas our parents may not have these benefits in their generations. This essay is going to discuss both pons and cons and my own opinions. Firstly, since the 18 century, the factories had huge improvements. This can convey that the production can be rapidly increased. Additionally, those companies can devote themselves to inventing more kinds of products. As a result, we do have various choices. This can have several benefits. For example, we can pick a suitable restaurant before we actually eat. Although it might have a host of shops to choose from, we can google it before we get in. In addition, the community can make the right decision. Secondly, it may have unexpected consequences. The folk may be annoyed due to enormous patterns. Unlike the last few decades, they were living in an infertility world. Hence, they have no other alternative choice. However, we may be bothered by too many things since we living in a complicated society. It may eventually lead to mental health because of the anxieties on deciding such as insomnia. To conclude, I do think that it has its sunny sides. Yet, I think that the negatives are more than the positives due to the sickness behind them. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: In the concurrent world, people can enjoy advanced technology and convenient internet. The folk can connect to a load of information, but they may not analyse whether it is correct or not. Also, we cannot deny that we do have lots of choices since we can easily access the cyber in our generation whereas our parents may not have these benefits in their generations. This essay is going to discuss both pons and cons and my own opinions. Firstly, since the 18 century, the factories had huge improvements. This can convey that the production can be rapidly increased. Additionally, those companies can devote themselves to inventing more kinds of products. As a result, we do have various choices. This can have several benefits. For example, we can pick a suitable restaurant before we actually eat. Although it might have a host of shops to choose from, we can google it before we get in. In addition, the community can make the right decision. Secondly, it may have unexpected consequences. The folk may be annoyed due to enormous patterns. Unlike the last few decades, they were living in an infertility world. Hence, they have no other alternative choice. However, we may be bothered by too many things since we living in a complicated society. It may eventually lead to mental health because of the anxieties on deciding such as insomnia. To conclude, I do think that it has its sunny sides. Yet, I think that the negatives are more than the positives due to the sickness behind them. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: In the concurrent world, people can enjoy advanced technology and convenient internet. The folk can connect to a load of information, but they may not analyse whether it is correct or not. Also, we cannot deny that we do have lots of choices since we can easily access the cyber in our generation whereas our parents may not have these benefits in their generations. This essay is going to discuss both pons and cons and my own opinions. Firstly, since the 18 century, the factories had huge improvements. This can convey that the production can be rapidly increased. Additionally, those companies can devote themselves to inventing more kinds of products. As a result, we do have various choices. This can have several benefits. For example, we can pick a suitable restaurant before we actually eat. Although it might have a host of shops to choose from, we can google it before we get in. In addition, the community can make the right decision. Secondly, it may have unexpected consequences. The folk may be annoyed due to enormous patterns. Unlike the last few decades, they were living in an infertility world. Hence, they have no other alternative choice. However, we may be bothered by too many things since we living in a complicated society. It may eventually lead to mental health because of the anxieties on deciding such as insomnia. To conclude, I do think that it has its sunny sides. Yet, I think that the negatives are more than the positives due to the sickness behind them. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: Some would argue that youngsters ought to have the freedom to make mistakes, whilst some believe that it is adults' duty to protect their offspring from any wrong activities. Although a miserable fault and learning from that can build a psychologically strong man, I personally do not agree with that statement because one evil step can make a child suffer and therefore parents can help them with their life experience. On the one hand, it is obvious that self-correction people remember the error for the life and it prevents them to do the same. Learning from blunders is normal in grown-up individuals ,however, it is something that the young generation can adopt from an early age for their mind build up. For example, the famous tennis player Mr Roger Federer was a rich spoiled brat, he did so many non-sportsman activities on the tennis court including breaking rackets and harassing the opponents, he had not listened to his coach before he realised his awful acts. At the time he understood his faults he transformed himself as one of the most generous tennis players of all time inside the court as well as outside. Nonetheless, everybody is not as lucky as Roger, nowadays adolescents are making serious mistakes such as taking drugs, involving in gambling and even murder. On the other hand, gentle parental guidance can prevent a young lad from committing juvenile delinquency. As human beings grow up they gather experiences from their own activities or learn for others life events; this knowledge can be shared with the offspring to prepare them to face the world. For instance, when a child grows up in an extended family, he gets a lot of attention and care from the family members especially grandparents, and grandparents can easily find if the grandchild has been involved with a bad company. Thus, growing up in a nuclear family helps the little one to grow in a safe and secure environment. In conclusion, though making mistakes can prepare a person mentally, it also falls at the risk of committing a crime and it is, hence, I am personally in the favour of parental guidance. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: Some would argue that youngsters ought to have the freedom to make mistakes, whilst some believe that it is adults' duty to protect their offspring from any wrong activities. Although a miserable fault and learning from that can build a psychologically strong man, I personally do not agree with that statement because one evil step can make a child suffer and therefore parents can help them with their life experience. On the one hand, it is obvious that self-correction people remember the error for the life and it prevents them to do the same. Learning from blunders is normal in grown-up individuals ,however, it is something that the young generation can adopt from an early age for their mind build up. For example, the famous tennis player Mr Roger Federer was a rich spoiled brat, he did so many non-sportsman activities on the tennis court including breaking rackets and harassing the opponents, he had not listened to his coach before he realised his awful acts. At the time he understood his faults he transformed himself as one of the most generous tennis players of all time inside the court as well as outside. Nonetheless, everybody is not as lucky as Roger, nowadays adolescents are making serious mistakes such as taking drugs, involving in gambling and even murder. On the other hand, gentle parental guidance can prevent a young lad from committing juvenile delinquency. As human beings grow up they gather experiences from their own activities or learn for others life events; this knowledge can be shared with the offspring to prepare them to face the world. For instance, when a child grows up in an extended family, he gets a lot of attention and care from the family members especially grandparents, and grandparents can easily find if the grandchild has been involved with a bad company. Thus, growing up in a nuclear family helps the little one to grow in a safe and secure environment. In conclusion, though making mistakes can prepare a person mentally, it also falls at the risk of committing a crime and it is, hence, I am personally in the favour of parental guidance. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: Some would argue that youngsters ought to have the freedom to make mistakes, whilst some believe that it is adults' duty to protect their offspring from any wrong activities. Although a miserable fault and learning from that can build a psychologically strong man, I personally do not agree with that statement because one evil step can make a child suffer and therefore parents can help them with their life experience. On the one hand, it is obvious that self-correction people remember the error for the life and it prevents them to do the same. Learning from blunders is normal in grown-up individuals ,however, it is something that the young generation can adopt from an early age for their mind build up. For example, the famous tennis player Mr Roger Federer was a rich spoiled brat, he did so many non-sportsman activities on the tennis court including breaking rackets and harassing the opponents, he had not listened to his coach before he realised his awful acts. At the time he understood his faults he transformed himself as one of the most generous tennis players of all time inside the court as well as outside. Nonetheless, everybody is not as lucky as Roger, nowadays adolescents are making serious mistakes such as taking drugs, involving in gambling and even murder. On the other hand, gentle parental guidance can prevent a young lad from committing juvenile delinquency. As human beings grow up they gather experiences from their own activities or learn for others life events; this knowledge can be shared with the offspring to prepare them to face the world. For instance, when a child grows up in an extended family, he gets a lot of attention and care from the family members especially grandparents, and grandparents can easily find if the grandchild has been involved with a bad company. Thus, growing up in a nuclear family helps the little one to grow in a safe and secure environment. In conclusion, though making mistakes can prepare a person mentally, it also falls at the risk of committing a crime and it is, hence, I am personally in the favour of parental guidance. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? Anwser: Some would argue that youngsters ought to have the freedom to make mistakes, whilst some believe that it is adults' duty to protect their offspring from any wrong activities. Although a miserable fault and learning from that can build a psychologically strong man, I personally do not agree with that statement because one evil step can make a child suffer and therefore parents can help them with their life experience. On the one hand, it is obvious that self-correction people remember the error for the life and it prevents them to do the same. Learning from blunders is normal in grown-up individuals ,however, it is something that the young generation can adopt from an early age for their mind build up. For example, the famous tennis player Mr Roger Federer was a rich spoiled brat, he did so many non-sportsman activities on the tennis court including breaking rackets and harassing the opponents, he had not listened to his coach before he realised his awful acts. At the time he understood his faults he transformed himself as one of the most generous tennis players of all time inside the court as well as outside. Nonetheless, everybody is not as lucky as Roger, nowadays adolescents are making serious mistakes such as taking drugs, involving in gambling and even murder. On the other hand, gentle parental guidance can prevent a young lad from committing juvenile delinquency. As human beings grow up they gather experiences from their own activities or learn for others life events; this knowledge can be shared with the offspring to prepare them to face the world. For instance, when a child grows up in an extended family, he gets a lot of attention and care from the family members especially grandparents, and grandparents can easily find if the grandchild has been involved with a bad company. Thus, growing up in a nuclear family helps the little one to grow in a safe and secure environment. In conclusion, though making mistakes can prepare a person mentally, it also falls at the risk of committing a crime and it is, hence, I am personally in the favour of parental guidance. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Today family members eat fewer meals together. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend? Anwser: In recent years it's been observed that more and more families are rarely gathering to have the daily meals together.I believe that this is happening because people are unable to balance between their occupations and personal life which has led to major cracks in normal family structure. To begin with, the cardinal reason for this phenomenon is the hectic schedules that most individuals have. As time progresses competitions are increasing tremendously, and in order to have and provide a decent life humans must work more and harder than their ancestors. A recent article that was published in the Guardian stated that compared to 20 years ago people's working hours had increased from 6 hours daily working to 9 hours. Therefore , when the breadwinner comes home other family members might be sleeping and it is difficult to find time to have a family meal. Although financial stability and providing the best life quality for our youngsters is something essential. Children need attention, care , and guidance from their parents. For example, dinner is a perfect opportunity to build children's self-esteem by listening to what they are saying. Moreover, it will teach them about family dynamics.so by not having that children could take the wrong route such as misbehaving at school, or start smoking, drinking alcohol and even sometimes they take life-threatening drugs like heroin. Hence , it is a moral obligation that every parent should guide and speak to their offspring frankly and the best way to do it is at the dinner table. In conclusion, while most parents are busy making a living and trying to give their kids the best opportunities, they are missing precious quality time that could be easily achieved by having at least one meal with the whole family. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Today family members eat fewer meals together. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend? Anwser: In recent years it's been observed that more and more families are rarely gathering to have the daily meals together.I believe that this is happening because people are unable to balance between their occupations and personal life which has led to major cracks in normal family structure. To begin with, the cardinal reason for this phenomenon is the hectic schedules that most individuals have. As time progresses competitions are increasing tremendously, and in order to have and provide a decent life humans must work more and harder than their ancestors. A recent article that was published in the Guardian stated that compared to 20 years ago people's working hours had increased from 6 hours daily working to 9 hours. Therefore , when the breadwinner comes home other family members might be sleeping and it is difficult to find time to have a family meal. Although financial stability and providing the best life quality for our youngsters is something essential. Children need attention, care , and guidance from their parents. For example, dinner is a perfect opportunity to build children's self-esteem by listening to what they are saying. Moreover, it will teach them about family dynamics.so by not having that children could take the wrong route such as misbehaving at school, or start smoking, drinking alcohol and even sometimes they take life-threatening drugs like heroin. Hence , it is a moral obligation that every parent should guide and speak to their offspring frankly and the best way to do it is at the dinner table. In conclusion, while most parents are busy making a living and trying to give their kids the best opportunities, they are missing precious quality time that could be easily achieved by having at least one meal with the whole family. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Today family members eat fewer meals together. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend? Anwser: In recent years it's been observed that more and more families are rarely gathering to have the daily meals together.I believe that this is happening because people are unable to balance between their occupations and personal life which has led to major cracks in normal family structure. To begin with, the cardinal reason for this phenomenon is the hectic schedules that most individuals have. As time progresses competitions are increasing tremendously, and in order to have and provide a decent life humans must work more and harder than their ancestors. A recent article that was published in the Guardian stated that compared to 20 years ago people's working hours had increased from 6 hours daily working to 9 hours. Therefore , when the breadwinner comes home other family members might be sleeping and it is difficult to find time to have a family meal. Although financial stability and providing the best life quality for our youngsters is something essential. Children need attention, care , and guidance from their parents. For example, dinner is a perfect opportunity to build children's self-esteem by listening to what they are saying. Moreover, it will teach them about family dynamics.so by not having that children could take the wrong route such as misbehaving at school, or start smoking, drinking alcohol and even sometimes they take life-threatening drugs like heroin. Hence , it is a moral obligation that every parent should guide and speak to their offspring frankly and the best way to do it is at the dinner table. In conclusion, while most parents are busy making a living and trying to give their kids the best opportunities, they are missing precious quality time that could be easily achieved by having at least one meal with the whole family. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Today family members eat fewer meals together. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend? Anwser: In recent years it's been observed that more and more families are rarely gathering to have the daily meals together.I believe that this is happening because people are unable to balance between their occupations and personal life which has led to major cracks in normal family structure. To begin with, the cardinal reason for this phenomenon is the hectic schedules that most individuals have. As time progresses competitions are increasing tremendously, and in order to have and provide a decent life humans must work more and harder than their ancestors. A recent article that was published in the Guardian stated that compared to 20 years ago people's working hours had increased from 6 hours daily working to 9 hours. Therefore , when the breadwinner comes home other family members might be sleeping and it is difficult to find time to have a family meal. Although financial stability and providing the best life quality for our youngsters is something essential. Children need attention, care , and guidance from their parents. For example, dinner is a perfect opportunity to build children's self-esteem by listening to what they are saying. Moreover, it will teach them about family dynamics.so by not having that children could take the wrong route such as misbehaving at school, or start smoking, drinking alcohol and even sometimes they take life-threatening drugs like heroin. Hence , it is a moral obligation that every parent should guide and speak to their offspring frankly and the best way to do it is at the dinner table. In conclusion, while most parents are busy making a living and trying to give their kids the best opportunities, they are missing precious quality time that could be easily achieved by having at least one meal with the whole family. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: the government should lower the bughet on the arts in order to allocate more money to education. To extend do you agree? Anwser: It is questioned if the government should give more money to education than the arts. On my behalf, I think that, in some way, art is a way of cultivating people too. Accordingly, it shouldn´t be possible to choose one. After all, places such as museums, galleries, exhibitions, concerts, dancing and other performances, form part of today´s education and even if the state had a bigger budget for schools, these institutions alone will never be enough. Firstly, in my opinion, all kinds of creative and artistic professions are very difficult nowadays. An example of this is the theatre. Not only because it requires a frequent adaptation and inconstancy but also due to the lack of value these persons receive. Furthermore, the enfluensive society members should cultivate these departments in order to decrease the state responsibility. After all, it concerns all of us. Secondly, assuming that the education would have more money, what would be the advantages? Will these profits be seen? Even if that actually made a difference in the academic formation it could bring a bigger impact on our children´s knowledge about the world. For example, art is essential through visual learning. Consequently, it is easier to retain certain information when we have an interaction with it, rather than reading something about the past or just memorizing it. To conclude, my opinion is extremely against this statement. Besides educational purposes, artistic works are important to humans daily lives. Nonetheless, it brings people joy, distractions, interests and imagination. Altogether, disvaluing the arts will have consequences for all of us. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: the government should lower the bughet on the arts in order to allocate more money to education. To extend do you agree? Anwser: It is questioned if the government should give more money to education than the arts. On my behalf, I think that, in some way, art is a way of cultivating people too. Accordingly, it shouldn´t be possible to choose one. After all, places such as museums, galleries, exhibitions, concerts, dancing and other performances, form part of today´s education and even if the state had a bigger budget for schools, these institutions alone will never be enough. Firstly, in my opinion, all kinds of creative and artistic professions are very difficult nowadays. An example of this is the theatre. Not only because it requires a frequent adaptation and inconstancy but also due to the lack of value these persons receive. Furthermore, the enfluensive society members should cultivate these departments in order to decrease the state responsibility. After all, it concerns all of us. Secondly, assuming that the education would have more money, what would be the advantages? Will these profits be seen? Even if that actually made a difference in the academic formation it could bring a bigger impact on our children´s knowledge about the world. For example, art is essential through visual learning. Consequently, it is easier to retain certain information when we have an interaction with it, rather than reading something about the past or just memorizing it. To conclude, my opinion is extremely against this statement. Besides educational purposes, artistic works are important to humans daily lives. Nonetheless, it brings people joy, distractions, interests and imagination. Altogether, disvaluing the arts will have consequences for all of us. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: the government should lower the bughet on the arts in order to allocate more money to education. To extend do you agree? Anwser: It is questioned if the government should give more money to education than the arts. On my behalf, I think that, in some way, art is a way of cultivating people too. Accordingly, it shouldn´t be possible to choose one. After all, places such as museums, galleries, exhibitions, concerts, dancing and other performances, form part of today´s education and even if the state had a bigger budget for schools, these institutions alone will never be enough. Firstly, in my opinion, all kinds of creative and artistic professions are very difficult nowadays. An example of this is the theatre. Not only because it requires a frequent adaptation and inconstancy but also due to the lack of value these persons receive. Furthermore, the enfluensive society members should cultivate these departments in order to decrease the state responsibility. After all, it concerns all of us. Secondly, assuming that the education would have more money, what would be the advantages? Will these profits be seen? Even if that actually made a difference in the academic formation it could bring a bigger impact on our children´s knowledge about the world. For example, art is essential through visual learning. Consequently, it is easier to retain certain information when we have an interaction with it, rather than reading something about the past or just memorizing it. To conclude, my opinion is extremely against this statement. Besides educational purposes, artistic works are important to humans daily lives. Nonetheless, it brings people joy, distractions, interests and imagination. Altogether, disvaluing the arts will have consequences for all of us. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: the government should lower the bughet on the arts in order to allocate more money to education. To extend do you agree? Anwser: It is questioned if the government should give more money to education than the arts. On my behalf, I think that, in some way, art is a way of cultivating people too. Accordingly, it shouldn´t be possible to choose one. After all, places such as museums, galleries, exhibitions, concerts, dancing and other performances, form part of today´s education and even if the state had a bigger budget for schools, these institutions alone will never be enough. Firstly, in my opinion, all kinds of creative and artistic professions are very difficult nowadays. An example of this is the theatre. Not only because it requires a frequent adaptation and inconstancy but also due to the lack of value these persons receive. Furthermore, the enfluensive society members should cultivate these departments in order to decrease the state responsibility. After all, it concerns all of us. Secondly, assuming that the education would have more money, what would be the advantages? Will these profits be seen? Even if that actually made a difference in the academic formation it could bring a bigger impact on our children´s knowledge about the world. For example, art is essential through visual learning. Consequently, it is easier to retain certain information when we have an interaction with it, rather than reading something about the past or just memorizing it. To conclude, my opinion is extremely against this statement. Besides educational purposes, artistic works are important to humans daily lives. Nonetheless, it brings people joy, distractions, interests and imagination. Altogether, disvaluing the arts will have consequences for all of us. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays an increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during life. Is this a positive or negative development? Anwser: These days, societies are given different career opportunities. Having different career options makes it more likely people move their accommodation as well for a number of times. This essay will discuss the issue of whether this gives society a positive or negative impact on their life. In my opinion, this is certainly positive as people can have more horizons and be avoided from boredom. Firstly, one of the reasons why the public tends to alter their profession and house is that they believe by doing so they will obtain more new horizons. It is argued that the profession and house alteration could offer individuals new insights and knowledge from the population that he or she meets in a new place. For instance, I have a sister who has changed her job frequently and moved to another place to live several times. She says that this allows her to have new skills which are needed to gain a better job in the future. Therefore, it is worth it to somewhat shift the occupation a couple of times. Secondly, moving out and in from one place to another in order to have a different career and home is promising to avoid being bored. It is commonly acknowledged that having the same environment and meeting the same people are somehow resulting in being bored. Consequently, the workers cannot work optimal and perform well at work. For example, when I used to be a teacher at a school five years ago. I worked for the school for three years and turned out to work badly as I was feeling bored in the same atmosphere for a quite long time. Thus, changing a new job more than once can give persons the motivation to perform well at work. In conclusion, though changing careers several times might sound strange for some people, for others this can be preferable as they are more likely to have new experiences and avoid boredom. In my personal view, this is positive since the societies are given opportunities to gain more new perspectives and escape from being bored. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays an increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during life. Is this a positive or negative development? Anwser: These days, societies are given different career opportunities. Having different career options makes it more likely people move their accommodation as well for a number of times. This essay will discuss the issue of whether this gives society a positive or negative impact on their life. In my opinion, this is certainly positive as people can have more horizons and be avoided from boredom. Firstly, one of the reasons why the public tends to alter their profession and house is that they believe by doing so they will obtain more new horizons. It is argued that the profession and house alteration could offer individuals new insights and knowledge from the population that he or she meets in a new place. For instance, I have a sister who has changed her job frequently and moved to another place to live several times. She says that this allows her to have new skills which are needed to gain a better job in the future. Therefore, it is worth it to somewhat shift the occupation a couple of times. Secondly, moving out and in from one place to another in order to have a different career and home is promising to avoid being bored. It is commonly acknowledged that having the same environment and meeting the same people are somehow resulting in being bored. Consequently, the workers cannot work optimal and perform well at work. For example, when I used to be a teacher at a school five years ago. I worked for the school for three years and turned out to work badly as I was feeling bored in the same atmosphere for a quite long time. Thus, changing a new job more than once can give persons the motivation to perform well at work. In conclusion, though changing careers several times might sound strange for some people, for others this can be preferable as they are more likely to have new experiences and avoid boredom. In my personal view, this is positive since the societies are given opportunities to gain more new perspectives and escape from being bored. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays an increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during life. Is this a positive or negative development? Anwser: These days, societies are given different career opportunities. Having different career options makes it more likely people move their accommodation as well for a number of times. This essay will discuss the issue of whether this gives society a positive or negative impact on their life. In my opinion, this is certainly positive as people can have more horizons and be avoided from boredom. Firstly, one of the reasons why the public tends to alter their profession and house is that they believe by doing so they will obtain more new horizons. It is argued that the profession and house alteration could offer individuals new insights and knowledge from the population that he or she meets in a new place. For instance, I have a sister who has changed her job frequently and moved to another place to live several times. She says that this allows her to have new skills which are needed to gain a better job in the future. Therefore, it is worth it to somewhat shift the occupation a couple of times. Secondly, moving out and in from one place to another in order to have a different career and home is promising to avoid being bored. It is commonly acknowledged that having the same environment and meeting the same people are somehow resulting in being bored. Consequently, the workers cannot work optimal and perform well at work. For example, when I used to be a teacher at a school five years ago. I worked for the school for three years and turned out to work badly as I was feeling bored in the same atmosphere for a quite long time. Thus, changing a new job more than once can give persons the motivation to perform well at work. In conclusion, though changing careers several times might sound strange for some people, for others this can be preferable as they are more likely to have new experiences and avoid boredom. In my personal view, this is positive since the societies are given opportunities to gain more new perspectives and escape from being bored. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays an increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during life. Is this a positive or negative development? Anwser: These days, societies are given different career opportunities. Having different career options makes it more likely people move their accommodation as well for a number of times. This essay will discuss the issue of whether this gives society a positive or negative impact on their life. In my opinion, this is certainly positive as people can have more horizons and be avoided from boredom. Firstly, one of the reasons why the public tends to alter their profession and house is that they believe by doing so they will obtain more new horizons. It is argued that the profession and house alteration could offer individuals new insights and knowledge from the population that he or she meets in a new place. For instance, I have a sister who has changed her job frequently and moved to another place to live several times. She says that this allows her to have new skills which are needed to gain a better job in the future. Therefore, it is worth it to somewhat shift the occupation a couple of times. Secondly, moving out and in from one place to another in order to have a different career and home is promising to avoid being bored. It is commonly acknowledged that having the same environment and meeting the same people are somehow resulting in being bored. Consequently, the workers cannot work optimal and perform well at work. For example, when I used to be a teacher at a school five years ago. I worked for the school for three years and turned out to work badly as I was feeling bored in the same atmosphere for a quite long time. Thus, changing a new job more than once can give persons the motivation to perform well at work. In conclusion, though changing careers several times might sound strange for some people, for others this can be preferable as they are more likely to have new experiences and avoid boredom. In my personal view, this is positive since the societies are given opportunities to gain more new perspectives and escape from being bored. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays people tend to change a few careers during life. What are the reasons for this, in your opinion? Do you think it is good for the society as a whole? Anwser: Altering jobs for several times for some people is getting more common nowadays. This essay will discuss the reasons why people do this and give my opinion on whether or not this is promising for the public as a whole. One of the reasons why today’s generations are likely to shift their occupations is that they are generally unsatisfied yet with their current job. This is because they might not feel adequate with the number of the salary that they earn from the job. As a result, they tend to change their job more than once. Another reason is that individuals want to have experience in different types of jobs. Some persons think that having more distinct jobs means having more experience which is considered crucial to getting a better job in the future. Thus, it is worth it to change the job several times for a better future. Moreover, changing a few careers during life is deemed promising. This is because by doing this, it will be beneficial for obtaining more horizons. In other words, the public can get more experiences as they will meet new people and new systems in different places. For instance, I have a brother who has changed his work many times, and he says that he gets some new insights and skills every time he works in a different place. In conclusion, there are many reasons why people are more likely to change their jobs throughout their life such as dissatisfaction with the current job and willingness to get more experience. In my personal opinion, this condition imparts positive impacts as people can gain more new knowledge and insights from distinctive circumstances. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays people tend to change a few careers during life. What are the reasons for this, in your opinion? Do you think it is good for the society as a whole? Anwser: Altering jobs for several times for some people is getting more common nowadays. This essay will discuss the reasons why people do this and give my opinion on whether or not this is promising for the public as a whole. One of the reasons why today’s generations are likely to shift their occupations is that they are generally unsatisfied yet with their current job. This is because they might not feel adequate with the number of the salary that they earn from the job. As a result, they tend to change their job more than once. Another reason is that individuals want to have experience in different types of jobs. Some persons think that having more distinct jobs means having more experience which is considered crucial to getting a better job in the future. Thus, it is worth it to change the job several times for a better future. Moreover, changing a few careers during life is deemed promising. This is because by doing this, it will be beneficial for obtaining more horizons. In other words, the public can get more experiences as they will meet new people and new systems in different places. For instance, I have a brother who has changed his work many times, and he says that he gets some new insights and skills every time he works in a different place. In conclusion, there are many reasons why people are more likely to change their jobs throughout their life such as dissatisfaction with the current job and willingness to get more experience. In my personal opinion, this condition imparts positive impacts as people can gain more new knowledge and insights from distinctive circumstances. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays people tend to change a few careers during life. What are the reasons for this, in your opinion? Do you think it is good for the society as a whole? Anwser: Altering jobs for several times for some people is getting more common nowadays. This essay will discuss the reasons why people do this and give my opinion on whether or not this is promising for the public as a whole. One of the reasons why today’s generations are likely to shift their occupations is that they are generally unsatisfied yet with their current job. This is because they might not feel adequate with the number of the salary that they earn from the job. As a result, they tend to change their job more than once. Another reason is that individuals want to have experience in different types of jobs. Some persons think that having more distinct jobs means having more experience which is considered crucial to getting a better job in the future. Thus, it is worth it to change the job several times for a better future. Moreover, changing a few careers during life is deemed promising. This is because by doing this, it will be beneficial for obtaining more horizons. In other words, the public can get more experiences as they will meet new people and new systems in different places. For instance, I have a brother who has changed his work many times, and he says that he gets some new insights and skills every time he works in a different place. In conclusion, there are many reasons why people are more likely to change their jobs throughout their life such as dissatisfaction with the current job and willingness to get more experience. In my personal opinion, this condition imparts positive impacts as people can gain more new knowledge and insights from distinctive circumstances. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays people tend to change a few careers during life. What are the reasons for this, in your opinion? Do you think it is good for the society as a whole? Anwser: Altering jobs for several times for some people is getting more common nowadays. This essay will discuss the reasons why people do this and give my opinion on whether or not this is promising for the public as a whole. One of the reasons why today’s generations are likely to shift their occupations is that they are generally unsatisfied yet with their current job. This is because they might not feel adequate with the number of the salary that they earn from the job. As a result, they tend to change their job more than once. Another reason is that individuals want to have experience in different types of jobs. Some persons think that having more distinct jobs means having more experience which is considered crucial to getting a better job in the future. Thus, it is worth it to change the job several times for a better future. Moreover, changing a few careers during life is deemed promising. This is because by doing this, it will be beneficial for obtaining more horizons. In other words, the public can get more experiences as they will meet new people and new systems in different places. For instance, I have a brother who has changed his work many times, and he says that he gets some new insights and skills every time he works in a different place. In conclusion, there are many reasons why people are more likely to change their jobs throughout their life such as dissatisfaction with the current job and willingness to get more experience. In my personal opinion, this condition imparts positive impacts as people can gain more new knowledge and insights from distinctive circumstances. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however think that change is always a good thing. Discuss the both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some people choose to spend their entire lives doing the same work and are not open to new changes. Meanwhile, some believe that change is always a good thing and are open to new things in life. This essay will discuss both views and give my personal opinion on the matter. First of all, a few individuals are fortunate enough to figure out early on what profession they are interested in and are eager to pursue. They continue to pursue their passion without exploring other options. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as in most cases they end up happy wherever they are. For instance, Elon Musk was always interested in becoming an engineer and wanted to do something unique for the world. He went on to build his own electric car company which manufactured cars that would not require a driver. Additionally, some folks may have responsibilities that compel them to not try different options such as people with a low income and poor living facilities. They are forced to continue with their job lifelong until retirement. On the other hand, people who take a chance and explore new options and fields find themselves fascinated and content. Some individuals take a gamble and pursue what they love later on in life. They may not always be successful but they are happy they tried. For example, Actor Rowan Atkinson had studied engineering and hoped to find a job in that field but his efforts proved to be futile. He tried his hand at acting and became a part of a show called 'Mr. Bean' which gained him worldwide popularity. Lastly, trying new things may not bring us success but it does enlighten us with new knowledge and experiences. In conclusion, I do believe change can lead to positive developments and if a person has the opportunity to test new things in life then they should absolutely try it. We should not take an opportunity for granted. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however think that change is always a good thing. Discuss the both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some people choose to spend their entire lives doing the same work and are not open to new changes. Meanwhile, some believe that change is always a good thing and are open to new things in life. This essay will discuss both views and give my personal opinion on the matter. First of all, a few individuals are fortunate enough to figure out early on what profession they are interested in and are eager to pursue. They continue to pursue their passion without exploring other options. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as in most cases they end up happy wherever they are. For instance, Elon Musk was always interested in becoming an engineer and wanted to do something unique for the world. He went on to build his own electric car company which manufactured cars that would not require a driver. Additionally, some folks may have responsibilities that compel them to not try different options such as people with a low income and poor living facilities. They are forced to continue with their job lifelong until retirement. On the other hand, people who take a chance and explore new options and fields find themselves fascinated and content. Some individuals take a gamble and pursue what they love later on in life. They may not always be successful but they are happy they tried. For example, Actor Rowan Atkinson had studied engineering and hoped to find a job in that field but his efforts proved to be futile. He tried his hand at acting and became a part of a show called 'Mr. Bean' which gained him worldwide popularity. Lastly, trying new things may not bring us success but it does enlighten us with new knowledge and experiences. In conclusion, I do believe change can lead to positive developments and if a person has the opportunity to test new things in life then they should absolutely try it. We should not take an opportunity for granted. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however think that change is always a good thing. Discuss the both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some people choose to spend their entire lives doing the same work and are not open to new changes. Meanwhile, some believe that change is always a good thing and are open to new things in life. This essay will discuss both views and give my personal opinion on the matter. First of all, a few individuals are fortunate enough to figure out early on what profession they are interested in and are eager to pursue. They continue to pursue their passion without exploring other options. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as in most cases they end up happy wherever they are. For instance, Elon Musk was always interested in becoming an engineer and wanted to do something unique for the world. He went on to build his own electric car company which manufactured cars that would not require a driver. Additionally, some folks may have responsibilities that compel them to not try different options such as people with a low income and poor living facilities. They are forced to continue with their job lifelong until retirement. On the other hand, people who take a chance and explore new options and fields find themselves fascinated and content. Some individuals take a gamble and pursue what they love later on in life. They may not always be successful but they are happy they tried. For example, Actor Rowan Atkinson had studied engineering and hoped to find a job in that field but his efforts proved to be futile. He tried his hand at acting and became a part of a show called 'Mr. Bean' which gained him worldwide popularity. Lastly, trying new things may not bring us success but it does enlighten us with new knowledge and experiences. In conclusion, I do believe change can lead to positive developments and if a person has the opportunity to test new things in life then they should absolutely try it. We should not take an opportunity for granted. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however think that change is always a good thing. Discuss the both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some people choose to spend their entire lives doing the same work and are not open to new changes. Meanwhile, some believe that change is always a good thing and are open to new things in life. This essay will discuss both views and give my personal opinion on the matter. First of all, a few individuals are fortunate enough to figure out early on what profession they are interested in and are eager to pursue. They continue to pursue their passion without exploring other options. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as in most cases they end up happy wherever they are. For instance, Elon Musk was always interested in becoming an engineer and wanted to do something unique for the world. He went on to build his own electric car company which manufactured cars that would not require a driver. Additionally, some folks may have responsibilities that compel them to not try different options such as people with a low income and poor living facilities. They are forced to continue with their job lifelong until retirement. On the other hand, people who take a chance and explore new options and fields find themselves fascinated and content. Some individuals take a gamble and pursue what they love later on in life. They may not always be successful but they are happy they tried. For example, Actor Rowan Atkinson had studied engineering and hoped to find a job in that field but his efforts proved to be futile. He tried his hand at acting and became a part of a show called 'Mr. Bean' which gained him worldwide popularity. Lastly, trying new things may not bring us success but it does enlighten us with new knowledge and experiences. In conclusion, I do believe change can lead to positive developments and if a person has the opportunity to test new things in life then they should absolutely try it. We should not take an opportunity for granted. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many jobs require ongoing training and research to stay competitive in a world with rapidly evolving information and technology. Some believe that it is the responsibility of businesses to pay for this training for their staff while others feel it is up to the individual. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: In this competitive corporate ,world it is necessary for many positions to have updated training and research with the advent of technology. While some would argue that employers are responsible for the payments, others believe that individuals ought to pay by themselves. Although when an employee can make reimbursement for the tuition, it eases financial circumstances, I personally believe that any career improvement course should be personal. On the one hand, in most cases when a company pays for the training ,cost it gives financial support. Spending for a personal development course after maintaining a family is an adamant task for most people and if this money comes from the organization, a sense of security comes to mind. For example, recruiting company Hayes did an on-job education servay where the data shows most of the applicants had not had pay from their pocket before they received any incentives from their employers. However, I believe that this approach takes out the freedom because there are some companies that make legal agreements before saying yes. On the other hand, if it is paid by self, it gives personal freedom to choose the subject, trainer and institution. In personally financed education trainee does not need to wait for the approval of the manager or board members and hence, this training can be secret. For instance, I have purchased a few skill development coursed on Udemy and I can watch them over and over and get the information needed. In addition, I can email or phone the instructors for any help or doubt. Thus, I am convinced that any development courses whether if for work or not should be financed by the individuals. In conclusion, it is mandatory for some jobs to have training as the world is evolving with technology and the Internet. While the payment by the company can give temporary relief, in the long ,run it may create problems and it is ,therefore, I think own payment is better. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many jobs require ongoing training and research to stay competitive in a world with rapidly evolving information and technology. Some believe that it is the responsibility of businesses to pay for this training for their staff while others feel it is up to the individual. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: In this competitive corporate ,world it is necessary for many positions to have updated training and research with the advent of technology. While some would argue that employers are responsible for the payments, others believe that individuals ought to pay by themselves. Although when an employee can make reimbursement for the tuition, it eases financial circumstances, I personally believe that any career improvement course should be personal. On the one hand, in most cases when a company pays for the training ,cost it gives financial support. Spending for a personal development course after maintaining a family is an adamant task for most people and if this money comes from the organization, a sense of security comes to mind. For example, recruiting company Hayes did an on-job education servay where the data shows most of the applicants had not had pay from their pocket before they received any incentives from their employers. However, I believe that this approach takes out the freedom because there are some companies that make legal agreements before saying yes. On the other hand, if it is paid by self, it gives personal freedom to choose the subject, trainer and institution. In personally financed education trainee does not need to wait for the approval of the manager or board members and hence, this training can be secret. For instance, I have purchased a few skill development coursed on Udemy and I can watch them over and over and get the information needed. In addition, I can email or phone the instructors for any help or doubt. Thus, I am convinced that any development courses whether if for work or not should be financed by the individuals. In conclusion, it is mandatory for some jobs to have training as the world is evolving with technology and the Internet. While the payment by the company can give temporary relief, in the long ,run it may create problems and it is ,therefore, I think own payment is better. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many jobs require ongoing training and research to stay competitive in a world with rapidly evolving information and technology. Some believe that it is the responsibility of businesses to pay for this training for their staff while others feel it is up to the individual. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: In this competitive corporate ,world it is necessary for many positions to have updated training and research with the advent of technology. While some would argue that employers are responsible for the payments, others believe that individuals ought to pay by themselves. Although when an employee can make reimbursement for the tuition, it eases financial circumstances, I personally believe that any career improvement course should be personal. On the one hand, in most cases when a company pays for the training ,cost it gives financial support. Spending for a personal development course after maintaining a family is an adamant task for most people and if this money comes from the organization, a sense of security comes to mind. For example, recruiting company Hayes did an on-job education servay where the data shows most of the applicants had not had pay from their pocket before they received any incentives from their employers. However, I believe that this approach takes out the freedom because there are some companies that make legal agreements before saying yes. On the other hand, if it is paid by self, it gives personal freedom to choose the subject, trainer and institution. In personally financed education trainee does not need to wait for the approval of the manager or board members and hence, this training can be secret. For instance, I have purchased a few skill development coursed on Udemy and I can watch them over and over and get the information needed. In addition, I can email or phone the instructors for any help or doubt. Thus, I am convinced that any development courses whether if for work or not should be financed by the individuals. In conclusion, it is mandatory for some jobs to have training as the world is evolving with technology and the Internet. While the payment by the company can give temporary relief, in the long ,run it may create problems and it is ,therefore, I think own payment is better. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many jobs require ongoing training and research to stay competitive in a world with rapidly evolving information and technology. Some believe that it is the responsibility of businesses to pay for this training for their staff while others feel it is up to the individual. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: In this competitive corporate ,world it is necessary for many positions to have updated training and research with the advent of technology. While some would argue that employers are responsible for the payments, others believe that individuals ought to pay by themselves. Although when an employee can make reimbursement for the tuition, it eases financial circumstances, I personally believe that any career improvement course should be personal. On the one hand, in most cases when a company pays for the training ,cost it gives financial support. Spending for a personal development course after maintaining a family is an adamant task for most people and if this money comes from the organization, a sense of security comes to mind. For example, recruiting company Hayes did an on-job education servay where the data shows most of the applicants had not had pay from their pocket before they received any incentives from their employers. However, I believe that this approach takes out the freedom because there are some companies that make legal agreements before saying yes. On the other hand, if it is paid by self, it gives personal freedom to choose the subject, trainer and institution. In personally financed education trainee does not need to wait for the approval of the manager or board members and hence, this training can be secret. For instance, I have purchased a few skill development coursed on Udemy and I can watch them over and over and get the information needed. In addition, I can email or phone the instructors for any help or doubt. Thus, I am convinced that any development courses whether if for work or not should be financed by the individuals. In conclusion, it is mandatory for some jobs to have training as the world is evolving with technology and the Internet. While the payment by the company can give temporary relief, in the long ,run it may create problems and it is ,therefore, I think own payment is better. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach in teaching? Anwser: Although in the past classroom education was the only way of learning, at the present internet and smartphone made a virtual classroom system that is becoming popular. I personally believe that this trend has positive sides such as cost-effective higher education and reduces carbon-di-oxide emission; the negatives are lacking in interpersonal communication and poor students cannot use the advent of technology. One of the principal advantages of having the latest technologies is that individuals can achieve higher degrees at a minimal cost. Loads of universities are offering long-distance study programmes nowadays where learners do not need to attain in person. For example, a number of private schools from the UK have distance learning systems and they offer a variety of courses all over the Globe. One of my friends has received a Master in Information Technology from the prestigious Leeds University, while he lived in his home country Bangladesh. Moreover, online teaching platforms might be environmentally friendly. If traditional schooling is off, people will not commute to their respective institutions and this will reduce carbon emissions in the air. One of the major disadvantages of the online learning system is that it is not suitable for all nations yet. There are some countries where basic necessities are hardly met; it is going to be an adamant duty for the Governments to set up costly infrastructure. For instance, more than sixty per cent of South Sudan citizens are living in the poverty and they cannot think about broadband connections at home. In addition, internet-based schooling has another problem which is undeveloped interpersonal skills. When undergrads work together in a room, they interact and understand the gestures of other students therefore it helps them in professional life. In conclusion, online teaching might not be suitable for all nations and it does not help to develop some social skills,however, it benefits people to get an honorary degree from a foreign university while working and staying in a different place as well as it has a green impact on the environment. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach in teaching? Anwser: Although in the past classroom education was the only way of learning, at the present internet and smartphone made a virtual classroom system that is becoming popular. I personally believe that this trend has positive sides such as cost-effective higher education and reduces carbon-di-oxide emission; the negatives are lacking in interpersonal communication and poor students cannot use the advent of technology. One of the principal advantages of having the latest technologies is that individuals can achieve higher degrees at a minimal cost. Loads of universities are offering long-distance study programmes nowadays where learners do not need to attain in person. For example, a number of private schools from the UK have distance learning systems and they offer a variety of courses all over the Globe. One of my friends has received a Master in Information Technology from the prestigious Leeds University, while he lived in his home country Bangladesh. Moreover, online teaching platforms might be environmentally friendly. If traditional schooling is off, people will not commute to their respective institutions and this will reduce carbon emissions in the air. One of the major disadvantages of the online learning system is that it is not suitable for all nations yet. There are some countries where basic necessities are hardly met; it is going to be an adamant duty for the Governments to set up costly infrastructure. For instance, more than sixty per cent of South Sudan citizens are living in the poverty and they cannot think about broadband connections at home. In addition, internet-based schooling has another problem which is undeveloped interpersonal skills. When undergrads work together in a room, they interact and understand the gestures of other students therefore it helps them in professional life. In conclusion, online teaching might not be suitable for all nations and it does not help to develop some social skills,however, it benefits people to get an honorary degree from a foreign university while working and staying in a different place as well as it has a green impact on the environment. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach in teaching? Anwser: Although in the past classroom education was the only way of learning, at the present internet and smartphone made a virtual classroom system that is becoming popular. I personally believe that this trend has positive sides such as cost-effective higher education and reduces carbon-di-oxide emission; the negatives are lacking in interpersonal communication and poor students cannot use the advent of technology. One of the principal advantages of having the latest technologies is that individuals can achieve higher degrees at a minimal cost. Loads of universities are offering long-distance study programmes nowadays where learners do not need to attain in person. For example, a number of private schools from the UK have distance learning systems and they offer a variety of courses all over the Globe. One of my friends has received a Master in Information Technology from the prestigious Leeds University, while he lived in his home country Bangladesh. Moreover, online teaching platforms might be environmentally friendly. If traditional schooling is off, people will not commute to their respective institutions and this will reduce carbon emissions in the air. One of the major disadvantages of the online learning system is that it is not suitable for all nations yet. There are some countries where basic necessities are hardly met; it is going to be an adamant duty for the Governments to set up costly infrastructure. For instance, more than sixty per cent of South Sudan citizens are living in the poverty and they cannot think about broadband connections at home. In addition, internet-based schooling has another problem which is undeveloped interpersonal skills. When undergrads work together in a room, they interact and understand the gestures of other students therefore it helps them in professional life. In conclusion, online teaching might not be suitable for all nations and it does not help to develop some social skills,however, it benefits people to get an honorary degree from a foreign university while working and staying in a different place as well as it has a green impact on the environment. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach in teaching? Anwser: Although in the past classroom education was the only way of learning, at the present internet and smartphone made a virtual classroom system that is becoming popular. I personally believe that this trend has positive sides such as cost-effective higher education and reduces carbon-di-oxide emission; the negatives are lacking in interpersonal communication and poor students cannot use the advent of technology. One of the principal advantages of having the latest technologies is that individuals can achieve higher degrees at a minimal cost. Loads of universities are offering long-distance study programmes nowadays where learners do not need to attain in person. For example, a number of private schools from the UK have distance learning systems and they offer a variety of courses all over the Globe. One of my friends has received a Master in Information Technology from the prestigious Leeds University, while he lived in his home country Bangladesh. Moreover, online teaching platforms might be environmentally friendly. If traditional schooling is off, people will not commute to their respective institutions and this will reduce carbon emissions in the air. One of the major disadvantages of the online learning system is that it is not suitable for all nations yet. There are some countries where basic necessities are hardly met; it is going to be an adamant duty for the Governments to set up costly infrastructure. For instance, more than sixty per cent of South Sudan citizens are living in the poverty and they cannot think about broadband connections at home. In addition, internet-based schooling has another problem which is undeveloped interpersonal skills. When undergrads work together in a room, they interact and understand the gestures of other students therefore it helps them in professional life. In conclusion, online teaching might not be suitable for all nations and it does not help to develop some social skills,however, it benefits people to get an honorary degree from a foreign university while working and staying in a different place as well as it has a green impact on the environment. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that exploitation and harnessing of renewable energy should be the prime goal of the world-ruling power. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil energies damage the planet. Although the clear powers do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 1000 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts each. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that exploitation and harnessing of renewable energy should be the prime goal of the world-ruling power. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil energies damage the planet. Although the clear powers do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 1000 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts each. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that exploitation and harnessing of renewable energy should be the prime goal of the world-ruling power. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil energies damage the planet. Although the clear powers do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 1000 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts each. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that exploitation and harnessing of renewable energy should be the prime goal of the world-ruling power. Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil energies damage the planet. Although the clear powers do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 1000 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts each. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that the exploitation and harnessing of renewable power should be the prime goal of world-ruling . Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil power damage the planet. Although the clear energies do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 500 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that the exploitation and harnessing of renewable power should be the prime goal of world-ruling . Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil power damage the planet. Although the clear energies do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 500 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that the exploitation and harnessing of renewable power should be the prime goal of world-ruling . Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil power damage the planet. Although the clear energies do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 500 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is believed that the exploitation and harnessing of renewable power should be the prime goal of world-ruling . Personally, I strongly agree with the view since fossil power damage the planet. Although the clear energies do not suffice all human beings' energy necessities. This essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, oil and petroleum pollute the environment. In other words, these sorts of powers release harmful substances to mother nature like carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide. 90 % of the planet industries are reported to be releasing 500 PPM of exhaust gases daily. It is pointed out by the University Zambeze magazine published last week for example. Moreover, these amounts of poisonous gases are regarded as highly elevated with the potential to cause global warming. As a result, extreme weather events are devastating many regions worldwide. On the other hand, clean energy does not appease electricity necessities. Because of the low voltage supplied by these sorts of powers, they do not solve individuals energy needs. For instance, to power solely one house with two freezers and three air conditioners 400 megawatts must be supplied which mean 100 solar panel modules of 27 watts. Hence, the big quantity of photovoltaic cells makes the project unsustainable as well as the large spaces needed to install them. Furthermore, It is the overriding reason for the world authorities hesitance to adopt these types of energies. In conclusion, notwithstanding the drawbacks of the alternative energies have, the world cabinets should invest more in these sorts of powers since fossil fuels are going to an end. Therefore, I still strongly agree with the view. Your task achievement score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: According to the British and Australian legislation judge members are not allowed to access the past defendant misdeeds to safeguard the convicts, However, some connoisseurs proposed the change of the rule, permitting the jury to know the outlaws' past life for sake of better judgment. Personally, I agree with the view owing to the fact that shortfall in information could condemn innocents. Although it has its adverse side effects. This essay will shed light on the matter and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, convicts' previous information saves innocents. In other words, it gathers relevant previous records, which help the judge members to take a better decision. Over the past years, 70% of defendants were imprisoned innocently in Australia due to lack of proof, and solely past records could solve the conundrum for instance. As a result, naive individuals were confined, and the criminal justice system was not fair enough. But after the ruling power taking in regard to the expert's suggestion not to blame were acquitted. On the other hand, the defendant's past facts revive the false past image. Because of what one had done in the past, he could simply be regarded guilt in case of ambiguity in a panel opinion. For example, recent research carried out by the University of Oxford showcased that a considerable number of guiltless were detained only for being in jail before. Hence, guiltless were jailed. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for tenure in a plethora of nations. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks the proposed change could result in judge members' decision, they should be allowed to access all convicts' past misdeeds for sake of removing all possible misunderstandings. Therefore I still agree with the view and I recommend the local ruling power takes into regard to these experts' proposal. Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: According to the British and Australian legislation judge members are not allowed to access the past defendant misdeeds to safeguard the convicts, However, some connoisseurs proposed the change of the rule, permitting the jury to know the outlaws' past life for sake of better judgment. Personally, I agree with the view owing to the fact that shortfall in information could condemn innocents. Although it has its adverse side effects. This essay will shed light on the matter and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, convicts' previous information saves innocents. In other words, it gathers relevant previous records, which help the judge members to take a better decision. Over the past years, 70% of defendants were imprisoned innocently in Australia due to lack of proof, and solely past records could solve the conundrum for instance. As a result, naive individuals were confined, and the criminal justice system was not fair enough. But after the ruling power taking in regard to the expert's suggestion not to blame were acquitted. On the other hand, the defendant's past facts revive the false past image. Because of what one had done in the past, he could simply be regarded guilt in case of ambiguity in a panel opinion. For example, recent research carried out by the University of Oxford showcased that a considerable number of guiltless were detained only for being in jail before. Hence, guiltless were jailed. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for tenure in a plethora of nations. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks the proposed change could result in judge members' decision, they should be allowed to access all convicts' past misdeeds for sake of removing all possible misunderstandings. Therefore I still agree with the view and I recommend the local ruling power takes into regard to these experts' proposal. Your lexical resource score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: According to the British and Australian legislation judge members are not allowed to access the past defendant misdeeds to safeguard the convicts, However, some connoisseurs proposed the change of the rule, permitting the jury to know the outlaws' past life for sake of better judgment. Personally, I agree with the view owing to the fact that shortfall in information could condemn innocents. Although it has its adverse side effects. This essay will shed light on the matter and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, convicts' previous information saves innocents. In other words, it gathers relevant previous records, which help the judge members to take a better decision. Over the past years, 70% of defendants were imprisoned innocently in Australia due to lack of proof, and solely past records could solve the conundrum for instance. As a result, naive individuals were confined, and the criminal justice system was not fair enough. But after the ruling power taking in regard to the expert's suggestion not to blame were acquitted. On the other hand, the defendant's past facts revive the false past image. Because of what one had done in the past, he could simply be regarded guilt in case of ambiguity in a panel opinion. For example, recent research carried out by the University of Oxford showcased that a considerable number of guiltless were detained only for being in jail before. Hence, guiltless were jailed. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for tenure in a plethora of nations. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks the proposed change could result in judge members' decision, they should be allowed to access all convicts' past misdeeds for sake of removing all possible misunderstandings. Therefore I still agree with the view and I recommend the local ruling power takes into regard to these experts' proposal. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: According to the British and Australian legislation judge members are not allowed to access the past defendant misdeeds to safeguard the convicts, However, some connoisseurs proposed the change of the rule, permitting the jury to know the outlaws' past life for sake of better judgment. Personally, I agree with the view owing to the fact that shortfall in information could condemn innocents. Although it has its adverse side effects. This essay will shed light on the matter and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, convicts' previous information saves innocents. In other words, it gathers relevant previous records, which help the judge members to take a better decision. Over the past years, 70% of defendants were imprisoned innocently in Australia due to lack of proof, and solely past records could solve the conundrum for instance. As a result, naive individuals were confined, and the criminal justice system was not fair enough. But after the ruling power taking in regard to the expert's suggestion not to blame were acquitted. On the other hand, the defendant's past facts revive the false past image. Because of what one had done in the past, he could simply be regarded guilt in case of ambiguity in a panel opinion. For example, recent research carried out by the University of Oxford showcased that a considerable number of guiltless were detained only for being in jail before. Hence, guiltless were jailed. Furthermore, it is the overriding reason for tenure in a plethora of nations. In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks the proposed change could result in judge members' decision, they should be allowed to access all convicts' past misdeeds for sake of removing all possible misunderstandings. Therefore I still agree with the view and I recommend the local ruling power takes into regard to these experts' proposal. Your task achievement score is 9.0