Datasets:

binhng

/

scoring_ielts_dataset_v1

like 1

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that in a city, the best way to travel is by car, while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: Few people believe that travelling the car is the ideal option to roam around the city, and other citizens trust that cycling is the best choice for travel in the town. This essay agrees that the cycle is the perfect selection to travel around the city. Starting with the motor vehicle's point of view, these days people prefer to travel around the city by car because it makes them feel comfortable. Apart from that, the public is saying that when they transfer from their home to the office with the help of a four-wheeler, their dress looks tidy and it helps to impress their office’s client to finish the deal. I disagree with the statement because people can adjust their clothes in the restroom, which makes them look like tidy people. For example, most journalists, are doing some touch activity in the employment rather than doing it at home. On the other hand, some public still prefer to use cycles as their transport to reach their office and other locations. Furthermore, utilizing the bi-cycle it helps to complete their cardio exercise without going to the gym. Simultaneously, it helps them to save their gym membership cost. Besides, it helps them to maintain their body condition at a constant level of fitness. I agree with the statement because it not only helps them to stay fit, but it helps the environment by reducing air pollution. For instance, people who are all living in Denmark are using bicycles to make their locations look green. In conclusion, few people are using cars for their travel to feel comfortable, and other people are using the two-wheelers to save their money. In my opinion, people can use their cars for long journeys and for short distances they can use a bicycle, which helps to reduce the rate of global warming level. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that in a city, the best way to travel is by car, while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: Few people believe that travelling the car is the ideal option to roam around the city, and other citizens trust that cycling is the best choice for travel in the town. This essay agrees that the cycle is the perfect selection to travel around the city. Starting with the motor vehicle's point of view, these days people prefer to travel around the city by car because it makes them feel comfortable. Apart from that, the public is saying that when they transfer from their home to the office with the help of a four-wheeler, their dress looks tidy and it helps to impress their office’s client to finish the deal. I disagree with the statement because people can adjust their clothes in the restroom, which makes them look like tidy people. For example, most journalists, are doing some touch activity in the employment rather than doing it at home. On the other hand, some public still prefer to use cycles as their transport to reach their office and other locations. Furthermore, utilizing the bi-cycle it helps to complete their cardio exercise without going to the gym. Simultaneously, it helps them to save their gym membership cost. Besides, it helps them to maintain their body condition at a constant level of fitness. I agree with the statement because it not only helps them to stay fit, but it helps the environment by reducing air pollution. For instance, people who are all living in Denmark are using bicycles to make their locations look green. In conclusion, few people are using cars for their travel to feel comfortable, and other people are using the two-wheelers to save their money. In my opinion, people can use their cars for long journeys and for short distances they can use a bicycle, which helps to reduce the rate of global warming level. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that in a city, the best way to travel is by car, while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: Few people believe that travelling the car is the ideal option to roam around the city, and other citizens trust that cycling is the best choice for travel in the town. This essay agrees that the cycle is the perfect selection to travel around the city. Starting with the motor vehicle's point of view, these days people prefer to travel around the city by car because it makes them feel comfortable. Apart from that, the public is saying that when they transfer from their home to the office with the help of a four-wheeler, their dress looks tidy and it helps to impress their office’s client to finish the deal. I disagree with the statement because people can adjust their clothes in the restroom, which makes them look like tidy people. For example, most journalists, are doing some touch activity in the employment rather than doing it at home. On the other hand, some public still prefer to use cycles as their transport to reach their office and other locations. Furthermore, utilizing the bi-cycle it helps to complete their cardio exercise without going to the gym. Simultaneously, it helps them to save their gym membership cost. Besides, it helps them to maintain their body condition at a constant level of fitness. I agree with the statement because it not only helps them to stay fit, but it helps the environment by reducing air pollution. For instance, people who are all living in Denmark are using bicycles to make their locations look green. In conclusion, few people are using cars for their travel to feel comfortable, and other people are using the two-wheelers to save their money. In my opinion, people can use their cars for long journeys and for short distances they can use a bicycle, which helps to reduce the rate of global warming level. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that in a city, the best way to travel is by car, while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: Few people believe that travelling the car is the ideal option to roam around the city, and other citizens trust that cycling is the best choice for travel in the town. This essay agrees that the cycle is the perfect selection to travel around the city. Starting with the motor vehicle's point of view, these days people prefer to travel around the city by car because it makes them feel comfortable. Apart from that, the public is saying that when they transfer from their home to the office with the help of a four-wheeler, their dress looks tidy and it helps to impress their office’s client to finish the deal. I disagree with the statement because people can adjust their clothes in the restroom, which makes them look like tidy people. For example, most journalists, are doing some touch activity in the employment rather than doing it at home. On the other hand, some public still prefer to use cycles as their transport to reach their office and other locations. Furthermore, utilizing the bi-cycle it helps to complete their cardio exercise without going to the gym. Simultaneously, it helps them to save their gym membership cost. Besides, it helps them to maintain their body condition at a constant level of fitness. I agree with the statement because it not only helps them to stay fit, but it helps the environment by reducing air pollution. For instance, people who are all living in Denmark are using bicycles to make their locations look green. In conclusion, few people are using cars for their travel to feel comfortable, and other people are using the two-wheelers to save their money. In my opinion, people can use their cars for long journeys and for short distances they can use a bicycle, which helps to reduce the rate of global warming level. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Write about following topic: Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. How do you think children should spend their free time? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: A group of people assume that the youth generation has a significant amount of free time and they think more responsibilities should be introduced by schools to fill this age. In my view, children have to be free and enjoy their teenage years because in adulthood they have to deal with a massive number of hardships , also if we make them do some extra activities it might have negative effects. To begin with, some families think this young generation have a great amount of extra free time and schools have to provide more tasks to keep them busy. However, it is not a positive development because at their age they do have not to struggle with difficulties, meanwhile, it is the best opportunity to satisfy all their need because they do not have any special duty. As the next adult generation ,they will have to deal with all kinds of problems, such as tax payment, shopping and work-related issues, as a result, I think this extra age will provide a chance for youngsters to prepare themselves for the future and have a clear mind. Furthermore, the teenage area is the most important period in their lives and if we put extra weight on their back they might indicate some anti-social behaviours, because they think it is their duty to consider tasks and if we force them they will react harshly. So it is better to let them be free on their own and as a community, we can supervise them and whenever our help is needed we can provide aid and direct them in the right orientation. For example, physiologists for controlling rebellious youth usually try to listen to them and try to not show any reaction to their incorrect behaviour and let the children think about their behaviours and in the end they help them with some advice. In conclusion, in my opinion, this generation may have extra free time, although, it is advantageous for them because makes this society able to completely enjoy their hood and they can be upbringing in the best way, moreover, as families, it is our duty to being tolerant and does not force them to do activities. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Write about following topic: Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. How do you think children should spend their free time? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: A group of people assume that the youth generation has a significant amount of free time and they think more responsibilities should be introduced by schools to fill this age. In my view, children have to be free and enjoy their teenage years because in adulthood they have to deal with a massive number of hardships , also if we make them do some extra activities it might have negative effects. To begin with, some families think this young generation have a great amount of extra free time and schools have to provide more tasks to keep them busy. However, it is not a positive development because at their age they do have not to struggle with difficulties, meanwhile, it is the best opportunity to satisfy all their need because they do not have any special duty. As the next adult generation ,they will have to deal with all kinds of problems, such as tax payment, shopping and work-related issues, as a result, I think this extra age will provide a chance for youngsters to prepare themselves for the future and have a clear mind. Furthermore, the teenage area is the most important period in their lives and if we put extra weight on their back they might indicate some anti-social behaviours, because they think it is their duty to consider tasks and if we force them they will react harshly. So it is better to let them be free on their own and as a community, we can supervise them and whenever our help is needed we can provide aid and direct them in the right orientation. For example, physiologists for controlling rebellious youth usually try to listen to them and try to not show any reaction to their incorrect behaviour and let the children think about their behaviours and in the end they help them with some advice. In conclusion, in my opinion, this generation may have extra free time, although, it is advantageous for them because makes this society able to completely enjoy their hood and they can be upbringing in the best way, moreover, as families, it is our duty to being tolerant and does not force them to do activities. Your lexical resource score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Write about following topic: Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. How do you think children should spend their free time? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: A group of people assume that the youth generation has a significant amount of free time and they think more responsibilities should be introduced by schools to fill this age. In my view, children have to be free and enjoy their teenage years because in adulthood they have to deal with a massive number of hardships , also if we make them do some extra activities it might have negative effects. To begin with, some families think this young generation have a great amount of extra free time and schools have to provide more tasks to keep them busy. However, it is not a positive development because at their age they do have not to struggle with difficulties, meanwhile, it is the best opportunity to satisfy all their need because they do not have any special duty. As the next adult generation ,they will have to deal with all kinds of problems, such as tax payment, shopping and work-related issues, as a result, I think this extra age will provide a chance for youngsters to prepare themselves for the future and have a clear mind. Furthermore, the teenage area is the most important period in their lives and if we put extra weight on their back they might indicate some anti-social behaviours, because they think it is their duty to consider tasks and if we force them they will react harshly. So it is better to let them be free on their own and as a community, we can supervise them and whenever our help is needed we can provide aid and direct them in the right orientation. For example, physiologists for controlling rebellious youth usually try to listen to them and try to not show any reaction to their incorrect behaviour and let the children think about their behaviours and in the end they help them with some advice. In conclusion, in my opinion, this generation may have extra free time, although, it is advantageous for them because makes this society able to completely enjoy their hood and they can be upbringing in the best way, moreover, as families, it is our duty to being tolerant and does not force them to do activities. Your grammatical range score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Write about following topic: Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. How do you think children should spend their free time? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: A group of people assume that the youth generation has a significant amount of free time and they think more responsibilities should be introduced by schools to fill this age. In my view, children have to be free and enjoy their teenage years because in adulthood they have to deal with a massive number of hardships , also if we make them do some extra activities it might have negative effects. To begin with, some families think this young generation have a great amount of extra free time and schools have to provide more tasks to keep them busy. However, it is not a positive development because at their age they do have not to struggle with difficulties, meanwhile, it is the best opportunity to satisfy all their need because they do not have any special duty. As the next adult generation ,they will have to deal with all kinds of problems, such as tax payment, shopping and work-related issues, as a result, I think this extra age will provide a chance for youngsters to prepare themselves for the future and have a clear mind. Furthermore, the teenage area is the most important period in their lives and if we put extra weight on their back they might indicate some anti-social behaviours, because they think it is their duty to consider tasks and if we force them they will react harshly. So it is better to let them be free on their own and as a community, we can supervise them and whenever our help is needed we can provide aid and direct them in the right orientation. For example, physiologists for controlling rebellious youth usually try to listen to them and try to not show any reaction to their incorrect behaviour and let the children think about their behaviours and in the end they help them with some advice. In conclusion, in my opinion, this generation may have extra free time, although, it is advantageous for them because makes this society able to completely enjoy their hood and they can be upbringing in the best way, moreover, as families, it is our duty to being tolerant and does not force them to do activities. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this is a bad example for adolescents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is true that, in today’s world, famous people are more renowned for their luxurious lifestyle and allure than their attainments. Some people think that these celebrities are influenced negatively by the young generations. I agree with this observation, however, there are celebrities presented as a good role model for children. There are good reasons to say that high-recognition people exert potential harm to adolescents’s way of thinking. Chief of these is that celebrities always post their fancy house, luxury watches, or expensive purses on social media instead of their outstanding achievements. Their talent might be standard or below the average but they still have a miracle life with money and cars. These people are making a sensation to the public that even if they do not have an excellent academic background, they still have everything from their rich partners or parents with privileged backgrounds. A hot Tiktoker, for example, had raised a trend on TikTok that women do not have to work hard or study hard, just marry a rich man so all the mansions, gold, and cars are all yours. It is certainly the behavior that would be a negative influence on young people as it teaches them to live on others' achievements. However, some famous people are popular for their incredible acts and outstanding performances. These people have shown the world that they reached their success through hard work, work ethic, and determination, and the public always recognizes them for their great attainments. One of the examples would be a famous businessman in VietNam Pham Nhat Vuong, he was born and raised in an unwealthy family in a poverty area in VietNam. Despite his unfortunate background, he studied hard and pursued his career without his family’s support and became one the richest people in VietNam. He is, now, a role model for many Vietnamese people to become successful at zero. In conclusion, there is no doubt that celebrities are well known for their wealth and hedonistic lifestyle, instead of their achievements and it would be a negative example for younger generations. To a certain point, I would disagree opinion, since other famous people are talented and have great performances. I think the public should be more selective in choosing their role models. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this is a bad example for adolescents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is true that, in today’s world, famous people are more renowned for their luxurious lifestyle and allure than their attainments. Some people think that these celebrities are influenced negatively by the young generations. I agree with this observation, however, there are celebrities presented as a good role model for children. There are good reasons to say that high-recognition people exert potential harm to adolescents’s way of thinking. Chief of these is that celebrities always post their fancy house, luxury watches, or expensive purses on social media instead of their outstanding achievements. Their talent might be standard or below the average but they still have a miracle life with money and cars. These people are making a sensation to the public that even if they do not have an excellent academic background, they still have everything from their rich partners or parents with privileged backgrounds. A hot Tiktoker, for example, had raised a trend on TikTok that women do not have to work hard or study hard, just marry a rich man so all the mansions, gold, and cars are all yours. It is certainly the behavior that would be a negative influence on young people as it teaches them to live on others' achievements. However, some famous people are popular for their incredible acts and outstanding performances. These people have shown the world that they reached their success through hard work, work ethic, and determination, and the public always recognizes them for their great attainments. One of the examples would be a famous businessman in VietNam Pham Nhat Vuong, he was born and raised in an unwealthy family in a poverty area in VietNam. Despite his unfortunate background, he studied hard and pursued his career without his family’s support and became one the richest people in VietNam. He is, now, a role model for many Vietnamese people to become successful at zero. In conclusion, there is no doubt that celebrities are well known for their wealth and hedonistic lifestyle, instead of their achievements and it would be a negative example for younger generations. To a certain point, I would disagree opinion, since other famous people are talented and have great performances. I think the public should be more selective in choosing their role models. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this is a bad example for adolescents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is true that, in today’s world, famous people are more renowned for their luxurious lifestyle and allure than their attainments. Some people think that these celebrities are influenced negatively by the young generations. I agree with this observation, however, there are celebrities presented as a good role model for children. There are good reasons to say that high-recognition people exert potential harm to adolescents’s way of thinking. Chief of these is that celebrities always post their fancy house, luxury watches, or expensive purses on social media instead of their outstanding achievements. Their talent might be standard or below the average but they still have a miracle life with money and cars. These people are making a sensation to the public that even if they do not have an excellent academic background, they still have everything from their rich partners or parents with privileged backgrounds. A hot Tiktoker, for example, had raised a trend on TikTok that women do not have to work hard or study hard, just marry a rich man so all the mansions, gold, and cars are all yours. It is certainly the behavior that would be a negative influence on young people as it teaches them to live on others' achievements. However, some famous people are popular for their incredible acts and outstanding performances. These people have shown the world that they reached their success through hard work, work ethic, and determination, and the public always recognizes them for their great attainments. One of the examples would be a famous businessman in VietNam Pham Nhat Vuong, he was born and raised in an unwealthy family in a poverty area in VietNam. Despite his unfortunate background, he studied hard and pursued his career without his family’s support and became one the richest people in VietNam. He is, now, a role model for many Vietnamese people to become successful at zero. In conclusion, there is no doubt that celebrities are well known for their wealth and hedonistic lifestyle, instead of their achievements and it would be a negative example for younger generations. To a certain point, I would disagree opinion, since other famous people are talented and have great performances. I think the public should be more selective in choosing their role models. Your grammatical range score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this is a bad example for adolescents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is true that, in today’s world, famous people are more renowned for their luxurious lifestyle and allure than their attainments. Some people think that these celebrities are influenced negatively by the young generations. I agree with this observation, however, there are celebrities presented as a good role model for children. There are good reasons to say that high-recognition people exert potential harm to adolescents’s way of thinking. Chief of these is that celebrities always post their fancy house, luxury watches, or expensive purses on social media instead of their outstanding achievements. Their talent might be standard or below the average but they still have a miracle life with money and cars. These people are making a sensation to the public that even if they do not have an excellent academic background, they still have everything from their rich partners or parents with privileged backgrounds. A hot Tiktoker, for example, had raised a trend on TikTok that women do not have to work hard or study hard, just marry a rich man so all the mansions, gold, and cars are all yours. It is certainly the behavior that would be a negative influence on young people as it teaches them to live on others' achievements. However, some famous people are popular for their incredible acts and outstanding performances. These people have shown the world that they reached their success through hard work, work ethic, and determination, and the public always recognizes them for their great attainments. One of the examples would be a famous businessman in VietNam Pham Nhat Vuong, he was born and raised in an unwealthy family in a poverty area in VietNam. Despite his unfortunate background, he studied hard and pursued his career without his family’s support and became one the richest people in VietNam. He is, now, a role model for many Vietnamese people to become successful at zero. In conclusion, there is no doubt that celebrities are well known for their wealth and hedonistic lifestyle, instead of their achievements and it would be a negative example for younger generations. To a certain point, I would disagree opinion, since other famous people are talented and have great performances. I think the public should be more selective in choosing their role models. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some scientist think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientist think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Scientists argue that there is a possibility of civilization on other planets, so in order to interact with them it is necessary to send them messages, while others believe that it can be troubling. In this essay, the idea of the first group, which aims to reach valuable insights and knowledge exchange, and the second perspective, which has inevitable consequences for inhabitants on Earth, will be discussed. Supporters assert that it would be useful if we find out whether life is possible on other planets, because not only will we gain valuable information, but we can also collaborate with alien civilizations who may be able to help humans in their survival. For example, NASA has concentrated on looking for radio waves around the world in order to conduct a search for extraterrestrial life. For this reason, they have invested in such a project to tell us whether long-term survival is possible and to give us reason for optimism. On the other hand, opponents believe that sending a message to an extraterrestrial civilization has positive consequences such as the exchange of knowledge and potential communication with an unknown civilization, it is important for the inhabitants of Earth to exercise all necessary caution when sending messages. In fact, there is a fear that making contact with unknown civilizations could lead to adverse consequences, such as the invasion of aliens, which may be more highly intelligent with a razor-sharp mind than humans. In conclusion, while sending a message could lead to the acquisition of sufficient information about other planets, carelessness in sending messages and not paying attention to its negative aspects could have unavoidable adverse effects on the earth. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some scientist think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientist think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Scientists argue that there is a possibility of civilization on other planets, so in order to interact with them it is necessary to send them messages, while others believe that it can be troubling. In this essay, the idea of the first group, which aims to reach valuable insights and knowledge exchange, and the second perspective, which has inevitable consequences for inhabitants on Earth, will be discussed. Supporters assert that it would be useful if we find out whether life is possible on other planets, because not only will we gain valuable information, but we can also collaborate with alien civilizations who may be able to help humans in their survival. For example, NASA has concentrated on looking for radio waves around the world in order to conduct a search for extraterrestrial life. For this reason, they have invested in such a project to tell us whether long-term survival is possible and to give us reason for optimism. On the other hand, opponents believe that sending a message to an extraterrestrial civilization has positive consequences such as the exchange of knowledge and potential communication with an unknown civilization, it is important for the inhabitants of Earth to exercise all necessary caution when sending messages. In fact, there is a fear that making contact with unknown civilizations could lead to adverse consequences, such as the invasion of aliens, which may be more highly intelligent with a razor-sharp mind than humans. In conclusion, while sending a message could lead to the acquisition of sufficient information about other planets, carelessness in sending messages and not paying attention to its negative aspects could have unavoidable adverse effects on the earth. Your lexical resource score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some scientist think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientist think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Scientists argue that there is a possibility of civilization on other planets, so in order to interact with them it is necessary to send them messages, while others believe that it can be troubling. In this essay, the idea of the first group, which aims to reach valuable insights and knowledge exchange, and the second perspective, which has inevitable consequences for inhabitants on Earth, will be discussed. Supporters assert that it would be useful if we find out whether life is possible on other planets, because not only will we gain valuable information, but we can also collaborate with alien civilizations who may be able to help humans in their survival. For example, NASA has concentrated on looking for radio waves around the world in order to conduct a search for extraterrestrial life. For this reason, they have invested in such a project to tell us whether long-term survival is possible and to give us reason for optimism. On the other hand, opponents believe that sending a message to an extraterrestrial civilization has positive consequences such as the exchange of knowledge and potential communication with an unknown civilization, it is important for the inhabitants of Earth to exercise all necessary caution when sending messages. In fact, there is a fear that making contact with unknown civilizations could lead to adverse consequences, such as the invasion of aliens, which may be more highly intelligent with a razor-sharp mind than humans. In conclusion, while sending a message could lead to the acquisition of sufficient information about other planets, carelessness in sending messages and not paying attention to its negative aspects could have unavoidable adverse effects on the earth. Your grammatical range score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some scientist think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientist think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Scientists argue that there is a possibility of civilization on other planets, so in order to interact with them it is necessary to send them messages, while others believe that it can be troubling. In this essay, the idea of the first group, which aims to reach valuable insights and knowledge exchange, and the second perspective, which has inevitable consequences for inhabitants on Earth, will be discussed. Supporters assert that it would be useful if we find out whether life is possible on other planets, because not only will we gain valuable information, but we can also collaborate with alien civilizations who may be able to help humans in their survival. For example, NASA has concentrated on looking for radio waves around the world in order to conduct a search for extraterrestrial life. For this reason, they have invested in such a project to tell us whether long-term survival is possible and to give us reason for optimism. On the other hand, opponents believe that sending a message to an extraterrestrial civilization has positive consequences such as the exchange of knowledge and potential communication with an unknown civilization, it is important for the inhabitants of Earth to exercise all necessary caution when sending messages. In fact, there is a fear that making contact with unknown civilizations could lead to adverse consequences, such as the invasion of aliens, which may be more highly intelligent with a razor-sharp mind than humans. In conclusion, while sending a message could lead to the acquisition of sufficient information about other planets, carelessness in sending messages and not paying attention to its negative aspects could have unavoidable adverse effects on the earth. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In this generation, everyone who has a smart device can capture the image and they can share it with others instantly. This feature is affecting the value of professional photographers. I totally disagree with the statement that taking a picture with a cell phone will decrease the value of professional photographers. First, using a professional camera will enable the person to capture the image in the best quality. Second, the top-end camera has a feature to change lenses according to the situation. Starting with the quality of the image, every top-end image capturing machine has a special chip to catch a photo, which helps the photo to deserve the best quality. Apart from that, they also have extra settings like adjusting shutter speed, ISO range to increase and decrease the brightness, grid option and much more. As a result, it helps the person to catch the shot perfectly. For example, most data scientists say that people are still taking passport photos with the help of a DSLR camera for their office usage. On the other hand, using a DSLR camera will allow the citizen to change the lens according to the environment. But, in the cell phone people do not have the option to interchange the lens. Moreover, when people change their special glass with the camera, it helps them to capture a precise shot of the circumstances. As a consequence, they can print the image without compromising the quality of the picture. For instance, most printer manufacturers said, that people deserve the best quality of an image when they use a DSLR camera. In conclusion, the professional camera has various features likes, changing lenses and special settings to adjust the colour of the picture to achieve the best photo. In my opinion, a professional camera is always a professional camera even the mobile industry comes with new technology cameras. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In this generation, everyone who has a smart device can capture the image and they can share it with others instantly. This feature is affecting the value of professional photographers. I totally disagree with the statement that taking a picture with a cell phone will decrease the value of professional photographers. First, using a professional camera will enable the person to capture the image in the best quality. Second, the top-end camera has a feature to change lenses according to the situation. Starting with the quality of the image, every top-end image capturing machine has a special chip to catch a photo, which helps the photo to deserve the best quality. Apart from that, they also have extra settings like adjusting shutter speed, ISO range to increase and decrease the brightness, grid option and much more. As a result, it helps the person to catch the shot perfectly. For example, most data scientists say that people are still taking passport photos with the help of a DSLR camera for their office usage. On the other hand, using a DSLR camera will allow the citizen to change the lens according to the environment. But, in the cell phone people do not have the option to interchange the lens. Moreover, when people change their special glass with the camera, it helps them to capture a precise shot of the circumstances. As a consequence, they can print the image without compromising the quality of the picture. For instance, most printer manufacturers said, that people deserve the best quality of an image when they use a DSLR camera. In conclusion, the professional camera has various features likes, changing lenses and special settings to adjust the colour of the picture to achieve the best photo. In my opinion, a professional camera is always a professional camera even the mobile industry comes with new technology cameras. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In this generation, everyone who has a smart device can capture the image and they can share it with others instantly. This feature is affecting the value of professional photographers. I totally disagree with the statement that taking a picture with a cell phone will decrease the value of professional photographers. First, using a professional camera will enable the person to capture the image in the best quality. Second, the top-end camera has a feature to change lenses according to the situation. Starting with the quality of the image, every top-end image capturing machine has a special chip to catch a photo, which helps the photo to deserve the best quality. Apart from that, they also have extra settings like adjusting shutter speed, ISO range to increase and decrease the brightness, grid option and much more. As a result, it helps the person to catch the shot perfectly. For example, most data scientists say that people are still taking passport photos with the help of a DSLR camera for their office usage. On the other hand, using a DSLR camera will allow the citizen to change the lens according to the environment. But, in the cell phone people do not have the option to interchange the lens. Moreover, when people change their special glass with the camera, it helps them to capture a precise shot of the circumstances. As a consequence, they can print the image without compromising the quality of the picture. For instance, most printer manufacturers said, that people deserve the best quality of an image when they use a DSLR camera. In conclusion, the professional camera has various features likes, changing lenses and special settings to adjust the colour of the picture to achieve the best photo. In my opinion, a professional camera is always a professional camera even the mobile industry comes with new technology cameras. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In this generation, everyone who has a smart device can capture the image and they can share it with others instantly. This feature is affecting the value of professional photographers. I totally disagree with the statement that taking a picture with a cell phone will decrease the value of professional photographers. First, using a professional camera will enable the person to capture the image in the best quality. Second, the top-end camera has a feature to change lenses according to the situation. Starting with the quality of the image, every top-end image capturing machine has a special chip to catch a photo, which helps the photo to deserve the best quality. Apart from that, they also have extra settings like adjusting shutter speed, ISO range to increase and decrease the brightness, grid option and much more. As a result, it helps the person to catch the shot perfectly. For example, most data scientists say that people are still taking passport photos with the help of a DSLR camera for their office usage. On the other hand, using a DSLR camera will allow the citizen to change the lens according to the environment. But, in the cell phone people do not have the option to interchange the lens. Moreover, when people change their special glass with the camera, it helps them to capture a precise shot of the circumstances. As a consequence, they can print the image without compromising the quality of the picture. For instance, most printer manufacturers said, that people deserve the best quality of an image when they use a DSLR camera. In conclusion, the professional camera has various features likes, changing lenses and special settings to adjust the colour of the picture to achieve the best photo. In my opinion, a professional camera is always a professional camera even the mobile industry comes with new technology cameras. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this a positive or negative thing? Anwser: The decrease in countryside population as people move to urban centres is a phenomenon observed in many countries around the world. This trend is often attributed to lack of rapid development in cities other than the central metropolises. This essay will explore both the advantages and disadvantages in the demographic shift. One of the positive aspects of rural-to-urban migration is the expansion of labour markets and employment opportunities in urban areas. Firstly, the coming of rural citizens into cities boosts the labour force in the central labour market, allowing private companies to find high-quality employees at reasonable wages. For instance, in Thailand, many factories set their minimum wage rates based on the availability of labour. Additionally, job opportunities are more abundant in central urban areas than in the countryside. This leads to a significant number of people choosing to settle in larger cities where they can benefit from better infrastructure and a wide range of services. The migration from rural areas to urban centres comes with drawbacks, including the reduction of human resources in smaller cities and increased cost of living in the central metropolises. Subsequently, the first significant issue is the dropping population in smaller areas, which results in a critical poverty of human resources for economic growth and urban development. For example, lesser-known cities in Thailand struggle to hold and attract their native people due to a lack of resources and incentives. Another adverse effect is the heightened cost of living in central urban areas, which escalates in response to the rising demand from an increasing population. Consequently, the Thai government’s focus on developing central areas and larger cities further encourages the influx of rural populations into the urban spaces, causing some problems. In conclusion, rural-to-urban migration presents both opportunities and challenges. While it can drive economic growth and job creation in major cities, it also exacerbates resource strain and ruins rural communities. A strategic approach, promoting balanced development and decentralising economic activities, is crucial. Encouraging remote work, incentivizing business expansion into less population areas, and improving rural infrastructures can relieve adverse effects. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this a positive or negative thing? Anwser: The decrease in countryside population as people move to urban centres is a phenomenon observed in many countries around the world. This trend is often attributed to lack of rapid development in cities other than the central metropolises. This essay will explore both the advantages and disadvantages in the demographic shift. One of the positive aspects of rural-to-urban migration is the expansion of labour markets and employment opportunities in urban areas. Firstly, the coming of rural citizens into cities boosts the labour force in the central labour market, allowing private companies to find high-quality employees at reasonable wages. For instance, in Thailand, many factories set their minimum wage rates based on the availability of labour. Additionally, job opportunities are more abundant in central urban areas than in the countryside. This leads to a significant number of people choosing to settle in larger cities where they can benefit from better infrastructure and a wide range of services. The migration from rural areas to urban centres comes with drawbacks, including the reduction of human resources in smaller cities and increased cost of living in the central metropolises. Subsequently, the first significant issue is the dropping population in smaller areas, which results in a critical poverty of human resources for economic growth and urban development. For example, lesser-known cities in Thailand struggle to hold and attract their native people due to a lack of resources and incentives. Another adverse effect is the heightened cost of living in central urban areas, which escalates in response to the rising demand from an increasing population. Consequently, the Thai government’s focus on developing central areas and larger cities further encourages the influx of rural populations into the urban spaces, causing some problems. In conclusion, rural-to-urban migration presents both opportunities and challenges. While it can drive economic growth and job creation in major cities, it also exacerbates resource strain and ruins rural communities. A strategic approach, promoting balanced development and decentralising economic activities, is crucial. Encouraging remote work, incentivizing business expansion into less population areas, and improving rural infrastructures can relieve adverse effects. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this a positive or negative thing? Anwser: The decrease in countryside population as people move to urban centres is a phenomenon observed in many countries around the world. This trend is often attributed to lack of rapid development in cities other than the central metropolises. This essay will explore both the advantages and disadvantages in the demographic shift. One of the positive aspects of rural-to-urban migration is the expansion of labour markets and employment opportunities in urban areas. Firstly, the coming of rural citizens into cities boosts the labour force in the central labour market, allowing private companies to find high-quality employees at reasonable wages. For instance, in Thailand, many factories set their minimum wage rates based on the availability of labour. Additionally, job opportunities are more abundant in central urban areas than in the countryside. This leads to a significant number of people choosing to settle in larger cities where they can benefit from better infrastructure and a wide range of services. The migration from rural areas to urban centres comes with drawbacks, including the reduction of human resources in smaller cities and increased cost of living in the central metropolises. Subsequently, the first significant issue is the dropping population in smaller areas, which results in a critical poverty of human resources for economic growth and urban development. For example, lesser-known cities in Thailand struggle to hold and attract their native people due to a lack of resources and incentives. Another adverse effect is the heightened cost of living in central urban areas, which escalates in response to the rising demand from an increasing population. Consequently, the Thai government’s focus on developing central areas and larger cities further encourages the influx of rural populations into the urban spaces, causing some problems. In conclusion, rural-to-urban migration presents both opportunities and challenges. While it can drive economic growth and job creation in major cities, it also exacerbates resource strain and ruins rural communities. A strategic approach, promoting balanced development and decentralising economic activities, is crucial. Encouraging remote work, incentivizing business expansion into less population areas, and improving rural infrastructures can relieve adverse effects. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this a positive or negative thing? Anwser: The decrease in countryside population as people move to urban centres is a phenomenon observed in many countries around the world. This trend is often attributed to lack of rapid development in cities other than the central metropolises. This essay will explore both the advantages and disadvantages in the demographic shift. One of the positive aspects of rural-to-urban migration is the expansion of labour markets and employment opportunities in urban areas. Firstly, the coming of rural citizens into cities boosts the labour force in the central labour market, allowing private companies to find high-quality employees at reasonable wages. For instance, in Thailand, many factories set their minimum wage rates based on the availability of labour. Additionally, job opportunities are more abundant in central urban areas than in the countryside. This leads to a significant number of people choosing to settle in larger cities where they can benefit from better infrastructure and a wide range of services. The migration from rural areas to urban centres comes with drawbacks, including the reduction of human resources in smaller cities and increased cost of living in the central metropolises. Subsequently, the first significant issue is the dropping population in smaller areas, which results in a critical poverty of human resources for economic growth and urban development. For example, lesser-known cities in Thailand struggle to hold and attract their native people due to a lack of resources and incentives. Another adverse effect is the heightened cost of living in central urban areas, which escalates in response to the rising demand from an increasing population. Consequently, the Thai government’s focus on developing central areas and larger cities further encourages the influx of rural populations into the urban spaces, causing some problems. In conclusion, rural-to-urban migration presents both opportunities and challenges. While it can drive economic growth and job creation in major cities, it also exacerbates resource strain and ruins rural communities. A strategic approach, promoting balanced development and decentralising economic activities, is crucial. Encouraging remote work, incentivizing business expansion into less population areas, and improving rural infrastructures can relieve adverse effects. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Eco-tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems, which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities. What problems can this cause? How can these problems be resolved? Anwser: In this present day and age, eco-tourism has surfaced as a subject sparking fervent discussion. There has been a controversial school of thought that local cultures and indigenous communities which are negatively affected by eco-tourism which includes visiting remote and fragile ecosystems. In this essay, I would like to shed light on these obstacles and provide a collective solution together in the following paragraphs. Many people consider that eco-tourism is the best way to have less carbon footprint. However, there have risen some problems on the local residents. Firstly, the main detrimental is a privacy for the indigenous communities. For instance, if a lot of tourists come there, it will disturb their peace and tranquillity. Secondly, it is unbelievable that eco-tourism causes pollution and waste of resources due to visitors’ activities such as cutting down trees for their lodges, spending a lot of water unnecessary and overfishing, and some meals being left over. It is seen as a way to set an example of how to impact on local people. Lastly, it is cultural erosion because some tourists make an incentive to the villagers for their preference leading to be affected on integrity and tradition’s belief. To address the negative impact of the above issues, several solutions can be implemented. First of all, training sessions should be provided to the tourist to understand the culture and sensitivity of local people. After that, travellers should have full knowledge of environmental protection also. Last but not least, the government should set a regulation and guidelines for eco-tourism. To conclude, eco-tourism will still be a good way if we handle drawbacks with suitable clarifications to reduce harm to local communities and culture. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Eco-tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems, which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities. What problems can this cause? How can these problems be resolved? Anwser: In this present day and age, eco-tourism has surfaced as a subject sparking fervent discussion. There has been a controversial school of thought that local cultures and indigenous communities which are negatively affected by eco-tourism which includes visiting remote and fragile ecosystems. In this essay, I would like to shed light on these obstacles and provide a collective solution together in the following paragraphs. Many people consider that eco-tourism is the best way to have less carbon footprint. However, there have risen some problems on the local residents. Firstly, the main detrimental is a privacy for the indigenous communities. For instance, if a lot of tourists come there, it will disturb their peace and tranquillity. Secondly, it is unbelievable that eco-tourism causes pollution and waste of resources due to visitors’ activities such as cutting down trees for their lodges, spending a lot of water unnecessary and overfishing, and some meals being left over. It is seen as a way to set an example of how to impact on local people. Lastly, it is cultural erosion because some tourists make an incentive to the villagers for their preference leading to be affected on integrity and tradition’s belief. To address the negative impact of the above issues, several solutions can be implemented. First of all, training sessions should be provided to the tourist to understand the culture and sensitivity of local people. After that, travellers should have full knowledge of environmental protection also. Last but not least, the government should set a regulation and guidelines for eco-tourism. To conclude, eco-tourism will still be a good way if we handle drawbacks with suitable clarifications to reduce harm to local communities and culture. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Eco-tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems, which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities. What problems can this cause? How can these problems be resolved? Anwser: In this present day and age, eco-tourism has surfaced as a subject sparking fervent discussion. There has been a controversial school of thought that local cultures and indigenous communities which are negatively affected by eco-tourism which includes visiting remote and fragile ecosystems. In this essay, I would like to shed light on these obstacles and provide a collective solution together in the following paragraphs. Many people consider that eco-tourism is the best way to have less carbon footprint. However, there have risen some problems on the local residents. Firstly, the main detrimental is a privacy for the indigenous communities. For instance, if a lot of tourists come there, it will disturb their peace and tranquillity. Secondly, it is unbelievable that eco-tourism causes pollution and waste of resources due to visitors’ activities such as cutting down trees for their lodges, spending a lot of water unnecessary and overfishing, and some meals being left over. It is seen as a way to set an example of how to impact on local people. Lastly, it is cultural erosion because some tourists make an incentive to the villagers for their preference leading to be affected on integrity and tradition’s belief. To address the negative impact of the above issues, several solutions can be implemented. First of all, training sessions should be provided to the tourist to understand the culture and sensitivity of local people. After that, travellers should have full knowledge of environmental protection also. Last but not least, the government should set a regulation and guidelines for eco-tourism. To conclude, eco-tourism will still be a good way if we handle drawbacks with suitable clarifications to reduce harm to local communities and culture. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Eco-tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems, which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities. What problems can this cause? How can these problems be resolved? Anwser: In this present day and age, eco-tourism has surfaced as a subject sparking fervent discussion. There has been a controversial school of thought that local cultures and indigenous communities which are negatively affected by eco-tourism which includes visiting remote and fragile ecosystems. In this essay, I would like to shed light on these obstacles and provide a collective solution together in the following paragraphs. Many people consider that eco-tourism is the best way to have less carbon footprint. However, there have risen some problems on the local residents. Firstly, the main detrimental is a privacy for the indigenous communities. For instance, if a lot of tourists come there, it will disturb their peace and tranquillity. Secondly, it is unbelievable that eco-tourism causes pollution and waste of resources due to visitors’ activities such as cutting down trees for their lodges, spending a lot of water unnecessary and overfishing, and some meals being left over. It is seen as a way to set an example of how to impact on local people. Lastly, it is cultural erosion because some tourists make an incentive to the villagers for their preference leading to be affected on integrity and tradition’s belief. To address the negative impact of the above issues, several solutions can be implemented. First of all, training sessions should be provided to the tourist to understand the culture and sensitivity of local people. After that, travellers should have full knowledge of environmental protection also. Last but not least, the government should set a regulation and guidelines for eco-tourism. To conclude, eco-tourism will still be a good way if we handle drawbacks with suitable clarifications to reduce harm to local communities and culture. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime? How can we deal with those causes? Anwser: In several countries, the rate of crime is rising. In this essay, my essay will show some reasons why this is happening and suggest several solutions to deal with this problem. There are two reasons behind the increase in crime. Firstly, the lack of family education is the most significant factor. For instance, parental divorce leads to a lack of love and time for their children, and inadequate education will develop a negative attitude. At last, this results in more serious crimes, such as bullying, or drug addiction. Secondly, unemployment is also an important factor. If people do not have income, while they still need to cover the cost of living, some of them may become thieves. Consequently, that has an enormous impact on the decreasing number of crime rates. There are several ways to decrease the number of crimes. To be specific, parents should spend more time for their kids by reducing working hours. Thus, they can have opportunities to listen to and share with their kids, thereby gaining a deeper understanding of them. As a result, their children can take a positive attitude toward life. Furthermore, the government should provide more job opportunities in order to reduce the rate of joblessness, and employees need to improve their skills and qualifications for the positions they’re applying for. By doing so, the government can create a variety of job markets and individuals can make themselves more attractive to employers and increase their chances of getting a job. If people can maintain their economic condition, they will not be involved in illegal activities. In conclusion, the number of crimes is growing due to inadequate family education and joblessness and this can be solved when parents spend more time for their children everyday and with the support of the government in creating job markets. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime? How can we deal with those causes? Anwser: In several countries, the rate of crime is rising. In this essay, my essay will show some reasons why this is happening and suggest several solutions to deal with this problem. There are two reasons behind the increase in crime. Firstly, the lack of family education is the most significant factor. For instance, parental divorce leads to a lack of love and time for their children, and inadequate education will develop a negative attitude. At last, this results in more serious crimes, such as bullying, or drug addiction. Secondly, unemployment is also an important factor. If people do not have income, while they still need to cover the cost of living, some of them may become thieves. Consequently, that has an enormous impact on the decreasing number of crime rates. There are several ways to decrease the number of crimes. To be specific, parents should spend more time for their kids by reducing working hours. Thus, they can have opportunities to listen to and share with their kids, thereby gaining a deeper understanding of them. As a result, their children can take a positive attitude toward life. Furthermore, the government should provide more job opportunities in order to reduce the rate of joblessness, and employees need to improve their skills and qualifications for the positions they’re applying for. By doing so, the government can create a variety of job markets and individuals can make themselves more attractive to employers and increase their chances of getting a job. If people can maintain their economic condition, they will not be involved in illegal activities. In conclusion, the number of crimes is growing due to inadequate family education and joblessness and this can be solved when parents spend more time for their children everyday and with the support of the government in creating job markets. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime? How can we deal with those causes? Anwser: In several countries, the rate of crime is rising. In this essay, my essay will show some reasons why this is happening and suggest several solutions to deal with this problem. There are two reasons behind the increase in crime. Firstly, the lack of family education is the most significant factor. For instance, parental divorce leads to a lack of love and time for their children, and inadequate education will develop a negative attitude. At last, this results in more serious crimes, such as bullying, or drug addiction. Secondly, unemployment is also an important factor. If people do not have income, while they still need to cover the cost of living, some of them may become thieves. Consequently, that has an enormous impact on the decreasing number of crime rates. There are several ways to decrease the number of crimes. To be specific, parents should spend more time for their kids by reducing working hours. Thus, they can have opportunities to listen to and share with their kids, thereby gaining a deeper understanding of them. As a result, their children can take a positive attitude toward life. Furthermore, the government should provide more job opportunities in order to reduce the rate of joblessness, and employees need to improve their skills and qualifications for the positions they’re applying for. By doing so, the government can create a variety of job markets and individuals can make themselves more attractive to employers and increase their chances of getting a job. If people can maintain their economic condition, they will not be involved in illegal activities. In conclusion, the number of crimes is growing due to inadequate family education and joblessness and this can be solved when parents spend more time for their children everyday and with the support of the government in creating job markets. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime? How can we deal with those causes? Anwser: In several countries, the rate of crime is rising. In this essay, my essay will show some reasons why this is happening and suggest several solutions to deal with this problem. There are two reasons behind the increase in crime. Firstly, the lack of family education is the most significant factor. For instance, parental divorce leads to a lack of love and time for their children, and inadequate education will develop a negative attitude. At last, this results in more serious crimes, such as bullying, or drug addiction. Secondly, unemployment is also an important factor. If people do not have income, while they still need to cover the cost of living, some of them may become thieves. Consequently, that has an enormous impact on the decreasing number of crime rates. There are several ways to decrease the number of crimes. To be specific, parents should spend more time for their kids by reducing working hours. Thus, they can have opportunities to listen to and share with their kids, thereby gaining a deeper understanding of them. As a result, their children can take a positive attitude toward life. Furthermore, the government should provide more job opportunities in order to reduce the rate of joblessness, and employees need to improve their skills and qualifications for the positions they’re applying for. By doing so, the government can create a variety of job markets and individuals can make themselves more attractive to employers and increase their chances of getting a job. If people can maintain their economic condition, they will not be involved in illegal activities. In conclusion, the number of crimes is growing due to inadequate family education and joblessness and this can be solved when parents spend more time for their children everyday and with the support of the government in creating job markets. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: In recent years, the use of cars has been becoming more popular. Although, I think that it maintains some obvious harmful consequences, I totally believe that the advantages of cars may outweigh its disadvantages.  On the one hand, owning a car has a side effect on the environment. The first reason is that the increased number of traveling by car causes a rise in air pollution. Secondly, individuals may become more dependent on cars, which leads to a decrease in physical activities, such as walking and cycling. People may have a chance of carrying some health issues that are caused by less activity like obesity or even heart attacks.  On the other hand, there are plenty of reasons why users prefer to own cars. Firstly, it allows people to manage time by traveling at any time. The ease of transportation that a car shows is significantly prominent compared to other types of vehicles. For instance, you can go from one point to another without waiting for a long time for a train or bus and no time is wasted. Therefore, distance and time are not a problem anymore. Secondly, private cars are more convenient while traveling than other public transports which are overcrowded and noisy. For example, you can enjoy things during your trip in a car like listening to music, having privacy, and talking to your kids, which seems impossible to have such things on public transport.  In conclusion, owning a car can cause a few clear issues, but in my view, having a car is the best option and the pros that it brings have more impact than drawbacks. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: In recent years, the use of cars has been becoming more popular. Although, I think that it maintains some obvious harmful consequences, I totally believe that the advantages of cars may outweigh its disadvantages.  On the one hand, owning a car has a side effect on the environment. The first reason is that the increased number of traveling by car causes a rise in air pollution. Secondly, individuals may become more dependent on cars, which leads to a decrease in physical activities, such as walking and cycling. People may have a chance of carrying some health issues that are caused by less activity like obesity or even heart attacks.  On the other hand, there are plenty of reasons why users prefer to own cars. Firstly, it allows people to manage time by traveling at any time. The ease of transportation that a car shows is significantly prominent compared to other types of vehicles. For instance, you can go from one point to another without waiting for a long time for a train or bus and no time is wasted. Therefore, distance and time are not a problem anymore. Secondly, private cars are more convenient while traveling than other public transports which are overcrowded and noisy. For example, you can enjoy things during your trip in a car like listening to music, having privacy, and talking to your kids, which seems impossible to have such things on public transport.  In conclusion, owning a car can cause a few clear issues, but in my view, having a car is the best option and the pros that it brings have more impact than drawbacks. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: In recent years, the use of cars has been becoming more popular. Although, I think that it maintains some obvious harmful consequences, I totally believe that the advantages of cars may outweigh its disadvantages.  On the one hand, owning a car has a side effect on the environment. The first reason is that the increased number of traveling by car causes a rise in air pollution. Secondly, individuals may become more dependent on cars, which leads to a decrease in physical activities, such as walking and cycling. People may have a chance of carrying some health issues that are caused by less activity like obesity or even heart attacks.  On the other hand, there are plenty of reasons why users prefer to own cars. Firstly, it allows people to manage time by traveling at any time. The ease of transportation that a car shows is significantly prominent compared to other types of vehicles. For instance, you can go from one point to another without waiting for a long time for a train or bus and no time is wasted. Therefore, distance and time are not a problem anymore. Secondly, private cars are more convenient while traveling than other public transports which are overcrowded and noisy. For example, you can enjoy things during your trip in a car like listening to music, having privacy, and talking to your kids, which seems impossible to have such things on public transport.  In conclusion, owning a car can cause a few clear issues, but in my view, having a car is the best option and the pros that it brings have more impact than drawbacks. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: In recent years, the use of cars has been becoming more popular. Although, I think that it maintains some obvious harmful consequences, I totally believe that the advantages of cars may outweigh its disadvantages.  On the one hand, owning a car has a side effect on the environment. The first reason is that the increased number of traveling by car causes a rise in air pollution. Secondly, individuals may become more dependent on cars, which leads to a decrease in physical activities, such as walking and cycling. People may have a chance of carrying some health issues that are caused by less activity like obesity or even heart attacks.  On the other hand, there are plenty of reasons why users prefer to own cars. Firstly, it allows people to manage time by traveling at any time. The ease of transportation that a car shows is significantly prominent compared to other types of vehicles. For instance, you can go from one point to another without waiting for a long time for a train or bus and no time is wasted. Therefore, distance and time are not a problem anymore. Secondly, private cars are more convenient while traveling than other public transports which are overcrowded and noisy. For example, you can enjoy things during your trip in a car like listening to music, having privacy, and talking to your kids, which seems impossible to have such things on public transport.  In conclusion, owning a car can cause a few clear issues, but in my view, having a car is the best option and the pros that it brings have more impact than drawbacks. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training . others belive they should be free to work in another coutnry if they wish . Discuess boh these views and give your opinion. Anwser: A group of citizens consider that doctors and engineers should find a position in their homelands, where they finish their studies, while others think that professionals should be free and choose their destination. I think any individual should be free and they have to follow their fate and reach their destiny. To begin with, some of the population think that highly educated people need to work in their country because they have some responsibilities about options that the country had been provided during their learning period. However, I do not believe this method is beneficial way, because when a group of workers have a plan to go abroad and we forbid them, they will be unsatisfied, as a result, in the long-term their efficiency will reduce because they feel that place is like a jail. On the other hand, as a human, we all have a right to think about our own future and find a way that completely suits us so we need to look for better situations, such as better salaries and developed equipment. If countries of doctors or engineers do not provide a good opportunity, gradually all the staff will look for better options in other locations ,because they have some needs and their main priority is to achieve their goals. In addition, that group of experts might be not able to find new solutions because they do not have access to the latest technologies. For instance, if we do not have a suitable material for developing new objects how we can flourish our talents, such as if we do not have uranium how we can develop our nuclear energy? I believe the countries just make limitations for us and if a human invents or cures some issue the profit of that achievement will impact the world so just working in the homeland is a useless concept. In conclusion, two groups of communities assume that expert workers have to find an occupation in their country , nonetheless, others view is opposite. In my view, it is a beneficial method to work anywhere despite locations because some better opportunities will make our lives more comfortable, additionally, it is not important that development occurs where because at last, it will spread all over the world. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training . others belive they should be free to work in another coutnry if they wish . Discuess boh these views and give your opinion. Anwser: A group of citizens consider that doctors and engineers should find a position in their homelands, where they finish their studies, while others think that professionals should be free and choose their destination. I think any individual should be free and they have to follow their fate and reach their destiny. To begin with, some of the population think that highly educated people need to work in their country because they have some responsibilities about options that the country had been provided during their learning period. However, I do not believe this method is beneficial way, because when a group of workers have a plan to go abroad and we forbid them, they will be unsatisfied, as a result, in the long-term their efficiency will reduce because they feel that place is like a jail. On the other hand, as a human, we all have a right to think about our own future and find a way that completely suits us so we need to look for better situations, such as better salaries and developed equipment. If countries of doctors or engineers do not provide a good opportunity, gradually all the staff will look for better options in other locations ,because they have some needs and their main priority is to achieve their goals. In addition, that group of experts might be not able to find new solutions because they do not have access to the latest technologies. For instance, if we do not have a suitable material for developing new objects how we can flourish our talents, such as if we do not have uranium how we can develop our nuclear energy? I believe the countries just make limitations for us and if a human invents or cures some issue the profit of that achievement will impact the world so just working in the homeland is a useless concept. In conclusion, two groups of communities assume that expert workers have to find an occupation in their country , nonetheless, others view is opposite. In my view, it is a beneficial method to work anywhere despite locations because some better opportunities will make our lives more comfortable, additionally, it is not important that development occurs where because at last, it will spread all over the world. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training . others belive they should be free to work in another coutnry if they wish . Discuess boh these views and give your opinion. Anwser: A group of citizens consider that doctors and engineers should find a position in their homelands, where they finish their studies, while others think that professionals should be free and choose their destination. I think any individual should be free and they have to follow their fate and reach their destiny. To begin with, some of the population think that highly educated people need to work in their country because they have some responsibilities about options that the country had been provided during their learning period. However, I do not believe this method is beneficial way, because when a group of workers have a plan to go abroad and we forbid them, they will be unsatisfied, as a result, in the long-term their efficiency will reduce because they feel that place is like a jail. On the other hand, as a human, we all have a right to think about our own future and find a way that completely suits us so we need to look for better situations, such as better salaries and developed equipment. If countries of doctors or engineers do not provide a good opportunity, gradually all the staff will look for better options in other locations ,because they have some needs and their main priority is to achieve their goals. In addition, that group of experts might be not able to find new solutions because they do not have access to the latest technologies. For instance, if we do not have a suitable material for developing new objects how we can flourish our talents, such as if we do not have uranium how we can develop our nuclear energy? I believe the countries just make limitations for us and if a human invents or cures some issue the profit of that achievement will impact the world so just working in the homeland is a useless concept. In conclusion, two groups of communities assume that expert workers have to find an occupation in their country , nonetheless, others view is opposite. In my view, it is a beneficial method to work anywhere despite locations because some better opportunities will make our lives more comfortable, additionally, it is not important that development occurs where because at last, it will spread all over the world. Your grammatical range score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training . others belive they should be free to work in another coutnry if they wish . Discuess boh these views and give your opinion. Anwser: A group of citizens consider that doctors and engineers should find a position in their homelands, where they finish their studies, while others think that professionals should be free and choose their destination. I think any individual should be free and they have to follow their fate and reach their destiny. To begin with, some of the population think that highly educated people need to work in their country because they have some responsibilities about options that the country had been provided during their learning period. However, I do not believe this method is beneficial way, because when a group of workers have a plan to go abroad and we forbid them, they will be unsatisfied, as a result, in the long-term their efficiency will reduce because they feel that place is like a jail. On the other hand, as a human, we all have a right to think about our own future and find a way that completely suits us so we need to look for better situations, such as better salaries and developed equipment. If countries of doctors or engineers do not provide a good opportunity, gradually all the staff will look for better options in other locations ,because they have some needs and their main priority is to achieve their goals. In addition, that group of experts might be not able to find new solutions because they do not have access to the latest technologies. For instance, if we do not have a suitable material for developing new objects how we can flourish our talents, such as if we do not have uranium how we can develop our nuclear energy? I believe the countries just make limitations for us and if a human invents or cures some issue the profit of that achievement will impact the world so just working in the homeland is a useless concept. In conclusion, two groups of communities assume that expert workers have to find an occupation in their country , nonetheless, others view is opposite. In my view, it is a beneficial method to work anywhere despite locations because some better opportunities will make our lives more comfortable, additionally, it is not important that development occurs where because at last, it will spread all over the world. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: International travel and tourism have become easier and more affordable. Is this a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Anwser: With the rapid growth of technology, the world has come a long way . In the midst of change, the lifestyle of the people has changed a lot. Nowadays, travelling become so much convenient and affordable . Travelling and tourism play significant roles in the country's economy . There is a range of conflicting arguments related to the assertion. The main agenda of the impending composition is to shed light on the both pros and cons as well as a proffer example to justify my assertion . To embark on , if we have a deep look at the assertion we will certainly be able to identify myriad reasons why some communities believe that it has numerous pros . The prominent point to address is travelling is all about connecting therefore, it helps people to connect to nature , landscape, culture , traditions and many more . Expounding it , travelling helps folks to gain knowledge , get experience and collect memories which they can cherish in future . For instance , children nowadays travel to new places during summer vacation which has more impact on their growth as they communicate with new people , try their local food , getting deep knowledge of their culture and traditions which is crucial for child development . Moving further , it is pertinent to mention that tourism occupies a good percentage of the country's economy . Justifying further , tourism Boosts the local economies and creation of jobs in tourist destinations. On the contrary , every coin has two sides. Some cons are also there as well as pros . The first and foremost key point is that travelling can be threatening to the environment . To embark , overpopulation because of tourists can be disturbing for the locals . As a subsequent point, it is also necessary to explore that , people are the biggest threat to nature. To explicate , while travelling unknowingly people destroy nature like they leave litter everywhere , and destroy public property. Therefore, some places banned tourists for a specific time . To cite an example , gangtok is a well-known hill station which is overcrowded by tourists almost all the time therefore , the government had to put restrictions on travelling there as tourists destroy their nature . To sum up , seeing the problem with a brighter mind , numerous solutions can be helpful to curb this menace . Weighting both assertions it is more justified to say this travelling has a positive impact on one's development as well as the country's development . Your coherence and cohesion score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: International travel and tourism have become easier and more affordable. Is this a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Anwser: With the rapid growth of technology, the world has come a long way . In the midst of change, the lifestyle of the people has changed a lot. Nowadays, travelling become so much convenient and affordable . Travelling and tourism play significant roles in the country's economy . There is a range of conflicting arguments related to the assertion. The main agenda of the impending composition is to shed light on the both pros and cons as well as a proffer example to justify my assertion . To embark on , if we have a deep look at the assertion we will certainly be able to identify myriad reasons why some communities believe that it has numerous pros . The prominent point to address is travelling is all about connecting therefore, it helps people to connect to nature , landscape, culture , traditions and many more . Expounding it , travelling helps folks to gain knowledge , get experience and collect memories which they can cherish in future . For instance , children nowadays travel to new places during summer vacation which has more impact on their growth as they communicate with new people , try their local food , getting deep knowledge of their culture and traditions which is crucial for child development . Moving further , it is pertinent to mention that tourism occupies a good percentage of the country's economy . Justifying further , tourism Boosts the local economies and creation of jobs in tourist destinations. On the contrary , every coin has two sides. Some cons are also there as well as pros . The first and foremost key point is that travelling can be threatening to the environment . To embark , overpopulation because of tourists can be disturbing for the locals . As a subsequent point, it is also necessary to explore that , people are the biggest threat to nature. To explicate , while travelling unknowingly people destroy nature like they leave litter everywhere , and destroy public property. Therefore, some places banned tourists for a specific time . To cite an example , gangtok is a well-known hill station which is overcrowded by tourists almost all the time therefore , the government had to put restrictions on travelling there as tourists destroy their nature . To sum up , seeing the problem with a brighter mind , numerous solutions can be helpful to curb this menace . Weighting both assertions it is more justified to say this travelling has a positive impact on one's development as well as the country's development . Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: International travel and tourism have become easier and more affordable. Is this a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Anwser: With the rapid growth of technology, the world has come a long way . In the midst of change, the lifestyle of the people has changed a lot. Nowadays, travelling become so much convenient and affordable . Travelling and tourism play significant roles in the country's economy . There is a range of conflicting arguments related to the assertion. The main agenda of the impending composition is to shed light on the both pros and cons as well as a proffer example to justify my assertion . To embark on , if we have a deep look at the assertion we will certainly be able to identify myriad reasons why some communities believe that it has numerous pros . The prominent point to address is travelling is all about connecting therefore, it helps people to connect to nature , landscape, culture , traditions and many more . Expounding it , travelling helps folks to gain knowledge , get experience and collect memories which they can cherish in future . For instance , children nowadays travel to new places during summer vacation which has more impact on their growth as they communicate with new people , try their local food , getting deep knowledge of their culture and traditions which is crucial for child development . Moving further , it is pertinent to mention that tourism occupies a good percentage of the country's economy . Justifying further , tourism Boosts the local economies and creation of jobs in tourist destinations. On the contrary , every coin has two sides. Some cons are also there as well as pros . The first and foremost key point is that travelling can be threatening to the environment . To embark , overpopulation because of tourists can be disturbing for the locals . As a subsequent point, it is also necessary to explore that , people are the biggest threat to nature. To explicate , while travelling unknowingly people destroy nature like they leave litter everywhere , and destroy public property. Therefore, some places banned tourists for a specific time . To cite an example , gangtok is a well-known hill station which is overcrowded by tourists almost all the time therefore , the government had to put restrictions on travelling there as tourists destroy their nature . To sum up , seeing the problem with a brighter mind , numerous solutions can be helpful to curb this menace . Weighting both assertions it is more justified to say this travelling has a positive impact on one's development as well as the country's development . Your grammatical range score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: International travel and tourism have become easier and more affordable. Is this a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Anwser: With the rapid growth of technology, the world has come a long way . In the midst of change, the lifestyle of the people has changed a lot. Nowadays, travelling become so much convenient and affordable . Travelling and tourism play significant roles in the country's economy . There is a range of conflicting arguments related to the assertion. The main agenda of the impending composition is to shed light on the both pros and cons as well as a proffer example to justify my assertion . To embark on , if we have a deep look at the assertion we will certainly be able to identify myriad reasons why some communities believe that it has numerous pros . The prominent point to address is travelling is all about connecting therefore, it helps people to connect to nature , landscape, culture , traditions and many more . Expounding it , travelling helps folks to gain knowledge , get experience and collect memories which they can cherish in future . For instance , children nowadays travel to new places during summer vacation which has more impact on their growth as they communicate with new people , try their local food , getting deep knowledge of their culture and traditions which is crucial for child development . Moving further , it is pertinent to mention that tourism occupies a good percentage of the country's economy . Justifying further , tourism Boosts the local economies and creation of jobs in tourist destinations. On the contrary , every coin has two sides. Some cons are also there as well as pros . The first and foremost key point is that travelling can be threatening to the environment . To embark , overpopulation because of tourists can be disturbing for the locals . As a subsequent point, it is also necessary to explore that , people are the biggest threat to nature. To explicate , while travelling unknowingly people destroy nature like they leave litter everywhere , and destroy public property. Therefore, some places banned tourists for a specific time . To cite an example , gangtok is a well-known hill station which is overcrowded by tourists almost all the time therefore , the government had to put restrictions on travelling there as tourists destroy their nature . To sum up , seeing the problem with a brighter mind , numerous solutions can be helpful to curb this menace . Weighting both assertions it is more justified to say this travelling has a positive impact on one's development as well as the country's development . Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies. Do the advantages of studyng abroad outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: More and more college pupils go to overseas to study. I believe this is good for your career, and I will discuss both the merits and demerits in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, going to other countries for learning is a good idea because you have to rely on yourself. You must learn how to be independent. Furthermore, you need to cook, live, and travel on your own. It is a big challenge for them. On top of that, using a second language is good for most of us. If you have lived in a nation that is speaking another language, people may think you might master this language. It is difficult to understand a new language. Besides, you can visit the famous tourist spots during your vacations. It is awesome, because you can stay they for a longer time. On the other hand, studying abroad is super expensive, and not everyone can afford it. Only the richer people have the money for their education. How can poor people have a chance to do it? I remember using exchange student programs may fulfill their dreams. For example, my mate, Cokie who is a woman, is interested in Korean culture. She went to Soul University for her master's courses. She joined the program which is supported by her school. It did not cost a lot of money to do it. Instead, she only paid a little money for it. Not every school has this plan, and my college is a case. In a nutshell, studying in a different country can broaden your horizons. You will think differently, be more mature, gain more knowledge, and so on. However, school fees are costly, and not everyone is able to pay them. Someone has financial difficulties. But you still have other ways to solve these problems. Overall, I think you will have more benefits if you leave your homeland for educating. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies. Do the advantages of studyng abroad outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: More and more college pupils go to overseas to study. I believe this is good for your career, and I will discuss both the merits and demerits in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, going to other countries for learning is a good idea because you have to rely on yourself. You must learn how to be independent. Furthermore, you need to cook, live, and travel on your own. It is a big challenge for them. On top of that, using a second language is good for most of us. If you have lived in a nation that is speaking another language, people may think you might master this language. It is difficult to understand a new language. Besides, you can visit the famous tourist spots during your vacations. It is awesome, because you can stay they for a longer time. On the other hand, studying abroad is super expensive, and not everyone can afford it. Only the richer people have the money for their education. How can poor people have a chance to do it? I remember using exchange student programs may fulfill their dreams. For example, my mate, Cokie who is a woman, is interested in Korean culture. She went to Soul University for her master's courses. She joined the program which is supported by her school. It did not cost a lot of money to do it. Instead, she only paid a little money for it. Not every school has this plan, and my college is a case. In a nutshell, studying in a different country can broaden your horizons. You will think differently, be more mature, gain more knowledge, and so on. However, school fees are costly, and not everyone is able to pay them. Someone has financial difficulties. But you still have other ways to solve these problems. Overall, I think you will have more benefits if you leave your homeland for educating. Your lexical resource score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies. Do the advantages of studyng abroad outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: More and more college pupils go to overseas to study. I believe this is good for your career, and I will discuss both the merits and demerits in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, going to other countries for learning is a good idea because you have to rely on yourself. You must learn how to be independent. Furthermore, you need to cook, live, and travel on your own. It is a big challenge for them. On top of that, using a second language is good for most of us. If you have lived in a nation that is speaking another language, people may think you might master this language. It is difficult to understand a new language. Besides, you can visit the famous tourist spots during your vacations. It is awesome, because you can stay they for a longer time. On the other hand, studying abroad is super expensive, and not everyone can afford it. Only the richer people have the money for their education. How can poor people have a chance to do it? I remember using exchange student programs may fulfill their dreams. For example, my mate, Cokie who is a woman, is interested in Korean culture. She went to Soul University for her master's courses. She joined the program which is supported by her school. It did not cost a lot of money to do it. Instead, she only paid a little money for it. Not every school has this plan, and my college is a case. In a nutshell, studying in a different country can broaden your horizons. You will think differently, be more mature, gain more knowledge, and so on. However, school fees are costly, and not everyone is able to pay them. Someone has financial difficulties. But you still have other ways to solve these problems. Overall, I think you will have more benefits if you leave your homeland for educating. Your grammatical range score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies. Do the advantages of studyng abroad outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: More and more college pupils go to overseas to study. I believe this is good for your career, and I will discuss both the merits and demerits in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, going to other countries for learning is a good idea because you have to rely on yourself. You must learn how to be independent. Furthermore, you need to cook, live, and travel on your own. It is a big challenge for them. On top of that, using a second language is good for most of us. If you have lived in a nation that is speaking another language, people may think you might master this language. It is difficult to understand a new language. Besides, you can visit the famous tourist spots during your vacations. It is awesome, because you can stay they for a longer time. On the other hand, studying abroad is super expensive, and not everyone can afford it. Only the richer people have the money for their education. How can poor people have a chance to do it? I remember using exchange student programs may fulfill their dreams. For example, my mate, Cokie who is a woman, is interested in Korean culture. She went to Soul University for her master's courses. She joined the program which is supported by her school. It did not cost a lot of money to do it. Instead, she only paid a little money for it. Not every school has this plan, and my college is a case. In a nutshell, studying in a different country can broaden your horizons. You will think differently, be more mature, gain more knowledge, and so on. However, school fees are costly, and not everyone is able to pay them. Someone has financial difficulties. But you still have other ways to solve these problems. Overall, I think you will have more benefits if you leave your homeland for educating. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, a lot of people are able to do their work from home. Discuss both the advantage and disadvantages of this development. Anwser: These days, many people are now working from home. Some of its disadvantages are that there are many distractions at home and it can lead to social isolation, however, the advantages it brings such as the ability to save more money and more flexibility are more beneficial to individuals. One of the disadvantages of remote work is that there are many distractions at home. Employees may not be able to fully concentrate on their work, and as a result, it can lead to decreased productivity. In addition to that, it can lead to social isolation. Studies have shown that those people who are working from home are more depressed because they are not interacting with others. For instance, the last COVID-19 pandemic has forced individuals to work from home, and this has led to an increased depression rate. Thus, working from home has its drawbacks. On the contrary, one of the advantages of working from home is that it can help people to save more money. They no longer have to spend money on transportation or gas, and this can lead to financial stability in the long run. Moreover, it gives them more flexibility. The time allotted for traveling to work can now be used to prepare meals for their children or other errands. For example, in the Philippines, those who are working from home can now attend school activities with their children because of this setup. Hence, these advantages are greater compared to their disadvantages. In conclusion, working from home is increasing in today's world. While its disadvantages such as increased distraction and social isolation can be a problem, I believe that its advantages are more beneficial because it can help individuals to save money and it gives them more flexibility. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, a lot of people are able to do their work from home. Discuss both the advantage and disadvantages of this development. Anwser: These days, many people are now working from home. Some of its disadvantages are that there are many distractions at home and it can lead to social isolation, however, the advantages it brings such as the ability to save more money and more flexibility are more beneficial to individuals. One of the disadvantages of remote work is that there are many distractions at home. Employees may not be able to fully concentrate on their work, and as a result, it can lead to decreased productivity. In addition to that, it can lead to social isolation. Studies have shown that those people who are working from home are more depressed because they are not interacting with others. For instance, the last COVID-19 pandemic has forced individuals to work from home, and this has led to an increased depression rate. Thus, working from home has its drawbacks. On the contrary, one of the advantages of working from home is that it can help people to save more money. They no longer have to spend money on transportation or gas, and this can lead to financial stability in the long run. Moreover, it gives them more flexibility. The time allotted for traveling to work can now be used to prepare meals for their children or other errands. For example, in the Philippines, those who are working from home can now attend school activities with their children because of this setup. Hence, these advantages are greater compared to their disadvantages. In conclusion, working from home is increasing in today's world. While its disadvantages such as increased distraction and social isolation can be a problem, I believe that its advantages are more beneficial because it can help individuals to save money and it gives them more flexibility. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, a lot of people are able to do their work from home. Discuss both the advantage and disadvantages of this development. Anwser: These days, many people are now working from home. Some of its disadvantages are that there are many distractions at home and it can lead to social isolation, however, the advantages it brings such as the ability to save more money and more flexibility are more beneficial to individuals. One of the disadvantages of remote work is that there are many distractions at home. Employees may not be able to fully concentrate on their work, and as a result, it can lead to decreased productivity. In addition to that, it can lead to social isolation. Studies have shown that those people who are working from home are more depressed because they are not interacting with others. For instance, the last COVID-19 pandemic has forced individuals to work from home, and this has led to an increased depression rate. Thus, working from home has its drawbacks. On the contrary, one of the advantages of working from home is that it can help people to save more money. They no longer have to spend money on transportation or gas, and this can lead to financial stability in the long run. Moreover, it gives them more flexibility. The time allotted for traveling to work can now be used to prepare meals for their children or other errands. For example, in the Philippines, those who are working from home can now attend school activities with their children because of this setup. Hence, these advantages are greater compared to their disadvantages. In conclusion, working from home is increasing in today's world. While its disadvantages such as increased distraction and social isolation can be a problem, I believe that its advantages are more beneficial because it can help individuals to save money and it gives them more flexibility. Your grammatical range score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, a lot of people are able to do their work from home. Discuss both the advantage and disadvantages of this development. Anwser: These days, many people are now working from home. Some of its disadvantages are that there are many distractions at home and it can lead to social isolation, however, the advantages it brings such as the ability to save more money and more flexibility are more beneficial to individuals. One of the disadvantages of remote work is that there are many distractions at home. Employees may not be able to fully concentrate on their work, and as a result, it can lead to decreased productivity. In addition to that, it can lead to social isolation. Studies have shown that those people who are working from home are more depressed because they are not interacting with others. For instance, the last COVID-19 pandemic has forced individuals to work from home, and this has led to an increased depression rate. Thus, working from home has its drawbacks. On the contrary, one of the advantages of working from home is that it can help people to save more money. They no longer have to spend money on transportation or gas, and this can lead to financial stability in the long run. Moreover, it gives them more flexibility. The time allotted for traveling to work can now be used to prepare meals for their children or other errands. For example, in the Philippines, those who are working from home can now attend school activities with their children because of this setup. Hence, these advantages are greater compared to their disadvantages. In conclusion, working from home is increasing in today's world. While its disadvantages such as increased distraction and social isolation can be a problem, I believe that its advantages are more beneficial because it can help individuals to save money and it gives them more flexibility. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Due to the increase in population in big cities, more and more people are living in small houses with very little or no outdoor space. Is this a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words. Model Answer Anwser: In contemporary urban landscapes, the surge in population density has led to a notable trend: an increasing number of individuals are residing in compact accommodations, often devoid of substantial outdoor areas. This phenomenon has elicited polarised opinions regarding its implications. While some view it as a concerning development, others contend that it may carry certain benefits. On one hand, the dwindling availability of spacious housing with ample outdoor space raises legitimate concerns because limited living quarters can contribute to feelings of claustrophobia and stress among residents. This arises as the absence of outdoor areas may impede opportunities for recreation and relaxation, potentially compromising residents' overall well-being. As a consequence, individuals might find it challenging to establish connections with nature, which is integral to mental and physical health. Conversely, proponents of this trend argue that compact living can foster resource efficiency and a sense of community. In densely populated areas, smaller dwellings often translate to shorter commutes and reduced carbon emissions, factors of utmost importance given issues of city pollution. Moreover, the proximity of neighbours in compact housing units can facilitate social interactions and mutual support networks, thereby promoting a stronger sense of belonging and solidarity among residents. In conclusion, the phenomenon of residing in small houses without substantial outdoor space presents a complex tapestry of advantages and drawbacks. In my view, while it may contribute to feelings of confinement and limit opportunities for outdoor activities, the potential to foster community cohesion and environmental sustainability is of upmost importance in today's world, and therefore overall it is a positive development Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Due to the increase in population in big cities, more and more people are living in small houses with very little or no outdoor space. Is this a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words. Model Answer Anwser: In contemporary urban landscapes, the surge in population density has led to a notable trend: an increasing number of individuals are residing in compact accommodations, often devoid of substantial outdoor areas. This phenomenon has elicited polarised opinions regarding its implications. While some view it as a concerning development, others contend that it may carry certain benefits. On one hand, the dwindling availability of spacious housing with ample outdoor space raises legitimate concerns because limited living quarters can contribute to feelings of claustrophobia and stress among residents. This arises as the absence of outdoor areas may impede opportunities for recreation and relaxation, potentially compromising residents' overall well-being. As a consequence, individuals might find it challenging to establish connections with nature, which is integral to mental and physical health. Conversely, proponents of this trend argue that compact living can foster resource efficiency and a sense of community. In densely populated areas, smaller dwellings often translate to shorter commutes and reduced carbon emissions, factors of utmost importance given issues of city pollution. Moreover, the proximity of neighbours in compact housing units can facilitate social interactions and mutual support networks, thereby promoting a stronger sense of belonging and solidarity among residents. In conclusion, the phenomenon of residing in small houses without substantial outdoor space presents a complex tapestry of advantages and drawbacks. In my view, while it may contribute to feelings of confinement and limit opportunities for outdoor activities, the potential to foster community cohesion and environmental sustainability is of upmost importance in today's world, and therefore overall it is a positive development Your lexical resource score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Due to the increase in population in big cities, more and more people are living in small houses with very little or no outdoor space. Is this a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words. Model Answer Anwser: In contemporary urban landscapes, the surge in population density has led to a notable trend: an increasing number of individuals are residing in compact accommodations, often devoid of substantial outdoor areas. This phenomenon has elicited polarised opinions regarding its implications. While some view it as a concerning development, others contend that it may carry certain benefits. On one hand, the dwindling availability of spacious housing with ample outdoor space raises legitimate concerns because limited living quarters can contribute to feelings of claustrophobia and stress among residents. This arises as the absence of outdoor areas may impede opportunities for recreation and relaxation, potentially compromising residents' overall well-being. As a consequence, individuals might find it challenging to establish connections with nature, which is integral to mental and physical health. Conversely, proponents of this trend argue that compact living can foster resource efficiency and a sense of community. In densely populated areas, smaller dwellings often translate to shorter commutes and reduced carbon emissions, factors of utmost importance given issues of city pollution. Moreover, the proximity of neighbours in compact housing units can facilitate social interactions and mutual support networks, thereby promoting a stronger sense of belonging and solidarity among residents. In conclusion, the phenomenon of residing in small houses without substantial outdoor space presents a complex tapestry of advantages and drawbacks. In my view, while it may contribute to feelings of confinement and limit opportunities for outdoor activities, the potential to foster community cohesion and environmental sustainability is of upmost importance in today's world, and therefore overall it is a positive development Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Due to the increase in population in big cities, more and more people are living in small houses with very little or no outdoor space. Is this a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words. Model Answer Anwser: In contemporary urban landscapes, the surge in population density has led to a notable trend: an increasing number of individuals are residing in compact accommodations, often devoid of substantial outdoor areas. This phenomenon has elicited polarised opinions regarding its implications. While some view it as a concerning development, others contend that it may carry certain benefits. On one hand, the dwindling availability of spacious housing with ample outdoor space raises legitimate concerns because limited living quarters can contribute to feelings of claustrophobia and stress among residents. This arises as the absence of outdoor areas may impede opportunities for recreation and relaxation, potentially compromising residents' overall well-being. As a consequence, individuals might find it challenging to establish connections with nature, which is integral to mental and physical health. Conversely, proponents of this trend argue that compact living can foster resource efficiency and a sense of community. In densely populated areas, smaller dwellings often translate to shorter commutes and reduced carbon emissions, factors of utmost importance given issues of city pollution. Moreover, the proximity of neighbours in compact housing units can facilitate social interactions and mutual support networks, thereby promoting a stronger sense of belonging and solidarity among residents. In conclusion, the phenomenon of residing in small houses without substantial outdoor space presents a complex tapestry of advantages and drawbacks. In my view, while it may contribute to feelings of confinement and limit opportunities for outdoor activities, the potential to foster community cohesion and environmental sustainability is of upmost importance in today's world, and therefore overall it is a positive development Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: When discussing fast food, it is becoming more economically viable and readily accessible in some countries. I strongly believe that this is an adverse trend and that the drawbacks are far surpassing benefits. It is true that owing to economic recession, inflationary spike, and persistent price hikes in certain areas, access to affordable and nutritious food has become a considerable obstacle for many individuals. Not only the cost of food but also the expenditure they have to spend on the transportation adds to their financial burden. It is widely recognized that these kinds of unhealthy food options have negative effects on health, but many consumers feel they have no choice as it is the most cost-effective option for them. It is more economical than purchasing nutritious meals and is widely available, also alleviating the impact of rising gas prices. However, from my stance, I do not see any upside regarding this issue. The adverse impacts of these obesity-inducing foods on individuals are profound. Indeed, buying fast food in order to save money is an absolute vicious circle. People who find it challenging to afford a healthy meal due to cost constraints may face difficulties in acquiring health insurance. Obesity can lead to several severe health problems. In the USA, a meal consisting of a burger, fries, and a soda may cost less than three dollars at a ubiquitous fast food establishment; nonetheless, a single visit to a medical facility could result in expenses exceeding a thousand dollars. In conclusion, although the affordability and accessibility of fast food may seem advantageous for individuals facing economic challenges in the short term, this represents a concerning trend with negative consequences both in terms of health and financially. The drawbacks of the issue are far surpassing the benefits in the long term. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: When discussing fast food, it is becoming more economically viable and readily accessible in some countries. I strongly believe that this is an adverse trend and that the drawbacks are far surpassing benefits. It is true that owing to economic recession, inflationary spike, and persistent price hikes in certain areas, access to affordable and nutritious food has become a considerable obstacle for many individuals. Not only the cost of food but also the expenditure they have to spend on the transportation adds to their financial burden. It is widely recognized that these kinds of unhealthy food options have negative effects on health, but many consumers feel they have no choice as it is the most cost-effective option for them. It is more economical than purchasing nutritious meals and is widely available, also alleviating the impact of rising gas prices. However, from my stance, I do not see any upside regarding this issue. The adverse impacts of these obesity-inducing foods on individuals are profound. Indeed, buying fast food in order to save money is an absolute vicious circle. People who find it challenging to afford a healthy meal due to cost constraints may face difficulties in acquiring health insurance. Obesity can lead to several severe health problems. In the USA, a meal consisting of a burger, fries, and a soda may cost less than three dollars at a ubiquitous fast food establishment; nonetheless, a single visit to a medical facility could result in expenses exceeding a thousand dollars. In conclusion, although the affordability and accessibility of fast food may seem advantageous for individuals facing economic challenges in the short term, this represents a concerning trend with negative consequences both in terms of health and financially. The drawbacks of the issue are far surpassing the benefits in the long term. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: When discussing fast food, it is becoming more economically viable and readily accessible in some countries. I strongly believe that this is an adverse trend and that the drawbacks are far surpassing benefits. It is true that owing to economic recession, inflationary spike, and persistent price hikes in certain areas, access to affordable and nutritious food has become a considerable obstacle for many individuals. Not only the cost of food but also the expenditure they have to spend on the transportation adds to their financial burden. It is widely recognized that these kinds of unhealthy food options have negative effects on health, but many consumers feel they have no choice as it is the most cost-effective option for them. It is more economical than purchasing nutritious meals and is widely available, also alleviating the impact of rising gas prices. However, from my stance, I do not see any upside regarding this issue. The adverse impacts of these obesity-inducing foods on individuals are profound. Indeed, buying fast food in order to save money is an absolute vicious circle. People who find it challenging to afford a healthy meal due to cost constraints may face difficulties in acquiring health insurance. Obesity can lead to several severe health problems. In the USA, a meal consisting of a burger, fries, and a soda may cost less than three dollars at a ubiquitous fast food establishment; nonetheless, a single visit to a medical facility could result in expenses exceeding a thousand dollars. In conclusion, although the affordability and accessibility of fast food may seem advantageous for individuals facing economic challenges in the short term, this represents a concerning trend with negative consequences both in terms of health and financially. The drawbacks of the issue are far surpassing the benefits in the long term. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: When discussing fast food, it is becoming more economically viable and readily accessible in some countries. I strongly believe that this is an adverse trend and that the drawbacks are far surpassing benefits. It is true that owing to economic recession, inflationary spike, and persistent price hikes in certain areas, access to affordable and nutritious food has become a considerable obstacle for many individuals. Not only the cost of food but also the expenditure they have to spend on the transportation adds to their financial burden. It is widely recognized that these kinds of unhealthy food options have negative effects on health, but many consumers feel they have no choice as it is the most cost-effective option for them. It is more economical than purchasing nutritious meals and is widely available, also alleviating the impact of rising gas prices. However, from my stance, I do not see any upside regarding this issue. The adverse impacts of these obesity-inducing foods on individuals are profound. Indeed, buying fast food in order to save money is an absolute vicious circle. People who find it challenging to afford a healthy meal due to cost constraints may face difficulties in acquiring health insurance. Obesity can lead to several severe health problems. In the USA, a meal consisting of a burger, fries, and a soda may cost less than three dollars at a ubiquitous fast food establishment; nonetheless, a single visit to a medical facility could result in expenses exceeding a thousand dollars. In conclusion, although the affordability and accessibility of fast food may seem advantageous for individuals facing economic challenges in the short term, this represents a concerning trend with negative consequences both in terms of health and financially. The drawbacks of the issue are far surpassing the benefits in the long term. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this? Anwser: In many nations, a lot of people are curious about the story of the house or building that they occupy. So this essay will discuss the reasons and the ways people can explore that information.   Generally, people are curious because they want to make essential decisions. If the house was constructed with materials that do not suit them, then it will require a re-build or renovation. To illustrate, the house was built with raw materials, so the new residents have a tendency to demolish it in order to make a strong building. In addition, perhaps people want to know about its story, whether it was a scary building or not. If they are not, individuals will continue the agreement, but if they are, they are probably cancelling the contract. For instance, 'The Potato House' in Bandung has not been sold out due to its underlying horror story. As a consequence, that house is abandoned, and no one is interested in it.   There is one way to explore this kind of information: either by asking the experts, in this case physical engineering and architects, or just simply asking the previous house owners for further inquiries. The owners will kindly answer such information; despite the fact that their knowledge is not as extensive as that of the experts, at least it will help people get an illustration of their future house or buildings. To illustrate, people normally ask when the last time those buildings were renovated was. If people get this information, it will provide assistance to the residents.   In summary, the story of the house or building is amusing for its residents. The reasons are to help people make pivotal decisions and, besides, to determine whether the building is scary or not. In terms of searching for that information, people can simply ask the previous owner or ask the experts. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this? Anwser: In many nations, a lot of people are curious about the story of the house or building that they occupy. So this essay will discuss the reasons and the ways people can explore that information.   Generally, people are curious because they want to make essential decisions. If the house was constructed with materials that do not suit them, then it will require a re-build or renovation. To illustrate, the house was built with raw materials, so the new residents have a tendency to demolish it in order to make a strong building. In addition, perhaps people want to know about its story, whether it was a scary building or not. If they are not, individuals will continue the agreement, but if they are, they are probably cancelling the contract. For instance, 'The Potato House' in Bandung has not been sold out due to its underlying horror story. As a consequence, that house is abandoned, and no one is interested in it.   There is one way to explore this kind of information: either by asking the experts, in this case physical engineering and architects, or just simply asking the previous house owners for further inquiries. The owners will kindly answer such information; despite the fact that their knowledge is not as extensive as that of the experts, at least it will help people get an illustration of their future house or buildings. To illustrate, people normally ask when the last time those buildings were renovated was. If people get this information, it will provide assistance to the residents.   In summary, the story of the house or building is amusing for its residents. The reasons are to help people make pivotal decisions and, besides, to determine whether the building is scary or not. In terms of searching for that information, people can simply ask the previous owner or ask the experts. Your lexical resource score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this? Anwser: In many nations, a lot of people are curious about the story of the house or building that they occupy. So this essay will discuss the reasons and the ways people can explore that information.   Generally, people are curious because they want to make essential decisions. If the house was constructed with materials that do not suit them, then it will require a re-build or renovation. To illustrate, the house was built with raw materials, so the new residents have a tendency to demolish it in order to make a strong building. In addition, perhaps people want to know about its story, whether it was a scary building or not. If they are not, individuals will continue the agreement, but if they are, they are probably cancelling the contract. For instance, 'The Potato House' in Bandung has not been sold out due to its underlying horror story. As a consequence, that house is abandoned, and no one is interested in it.   There is one way to explore this kind of information: either by asking the experts, in this case physical engineering and architects, or just simply asking the previous house owners for further inquiries. The owners will kindly answer such information; despite the fact that their knowledge is not as extensive as that of the experts, at least it will help people get an illustration of their future house or buildings. To illustrate, people normally ask when the last time those buildings were renovated was. If people get this information, it will provide assistance to the residents.   In summary, the story of the house or building is amusing for its residents. The reasons are to help people make pivotal decisions and, besides, to determine whether the building is scary or not. In terms of searching for that information, people can simply ask the previous owner or ask the experts. Your grammatical range score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this? Anwser: In many nations, a lot of people are curious about the story of the house or building that they occupy. So this essay will discuss the reasons and the ways people can explore that information.   Generally, people are curious because they want to make essential decisions. If the house was constructed with materials that do not suit them, then it will require a re-build or renovation. To illustrate, the house was built with raw materials, so the new residents have a tendency to demolish it in order to make a strong building. In addition, perhaps people want to know about its story, whether it was a scary building or not. If they are not, individuals will continue the agreement, but if they are, they are probably cancelling the contract. For instance, 'The Potato House' in Bandung has not been sold out due to its underlying horror story. As a consequence, that house is abandoned, and no one is interested in it.   There is one way to explore this kind of information: either by asking the experts, in this case physical engineering and architects, or just simply asking the previous house owners for further inquiries. The owners will kindly answer such information; despite the fact that their knowledge is not as extensive as that of the experts, at least it will help people get an illustration of their future house or buildings. To illustrate, people normally ask when the last time those buildings were renovated was. If people get this information, it will provide assistance to the residents.   In summary, the story of the house or building is amusing for its residents. The reasons are to help people make pivotal decisions and, besides, to determine whether the building is scary or not. In terms of searching for that information, people can simply ask the previous owner or ask the experts. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disanvantages of giving children this message? Anwser: It is common for many cultures to tell the youth that they can get anything they want as long as they struggle enough. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits first, then describe the disadvantages of this message. On the one hand, telling young people such a message has some benefits. First, they will have unlimited dreams. This is down to young generations having the motivation that everything is possible. For example, nowadays, most of the unprivileged students in Indonesia are successful in entering the Ivy League universities, such as Columbia, Stanford, and Harvard. Furthermore, this kind of message can lead young people to be highly confident about their future. Take Jokowi, for example; he was nothing until the young version of him became a Solo Mayor (one of the cities in Indonesia) and now a president. On several occasions, he frequently mentioned that his achievement would not have happened if he did not believe in his dream and strive for it. On the other hand, there are several drawbacks, like the tendency to blame themselves and just play it safe. These people will question why they fail when some people get what they want. As a result, they tend to have low self-confidence. If this happens, either they will limit their opportunity by not taking any risks or, in the worst case, these young people will end their lives. For instance, it was reported that a lot of Korean students who choose to be ordinary sellers give up on their dreams because they no longer believe in their self-worth. Besides, in the worst case, young generations decided to commit suicide just because they could not enter the universities that they wished for. To conclude, having unlimited dreams and shaping them to have high self-esteem are the benefits of telling the juvenils that they can accomplish their desired things by struggling enough. However, it can cause some drawbacks, such as making them a safe player, and they will blame themselves if they are unable to get those things. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disanvantages of giving children this message? Anwser: It is common for many cultures to tell the youth that they can get anything they want as long as they struggle enough. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits first, then describe the disadvantages of this message. On the one hand, telling young people such a message has some benefits. First, they will have unlimited dreams. This is down to young generations having the motivation that everything is possible. For example, nowadays, most of the unprivileged students in Indonesia are successful in entering the Ivy League universities, such as Columbia, Stanford, and Harvard. Furthermore, this kind of message can lead young people to be highly confident about their future. Take Jokowi, for example; he was nothing until the young version of him became a Solo Mayor (one of the cities in Indonesia) and now a president. On several occasions, he frequently mentioned that his achievement would not have happened if he did not believe in his dream and strive for it. On the other hand, there are several drawbacks, like the tendency to blame themselves and just play it safe. These people will question why they fail when some people get what they want. As a result, they tend to have low self-confidence. If this happens, either they will limit their opportunity by not taking any risks or, in the worst case, these young people will end their lives. For instance, it was reported that a lot of Korean students who choose to be ordinary sellers give up on their dreams because they no longer believe in their self-worth. Besides, in the worst case, young generations decided to commit suicide just because they could not enter the universities that they wished for. To conclude, having unlimited dreams and shaping them to have high self-esteem are the benefits of telling the juvenils that they can accomplish their desired things by struggling enough. However, it can cause some drawbacks, such as making them a safe player, and they will blame themselves if they are unable to get those things. Your lexical resource score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disanvantages of giving children this message? Anwser: It is common for many cultures to tell the youth that they can get anything they want as long as they struggle enough. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits first, then describe the disadvantages of this message. On the one hand, telling young people such a message has some benefits. First, they will have unlimited dreams. This is down to young generations having the motivation that everything is possible. For example, nowadays, most of the unprivileged students in Indonesia are successful in entering the Ivy League universities, such as Columbia, Stanford, and Harvard. Furthermore, this kind of message can lead young people to be highly confident about their future. Take Jokowi, for example; he was nothing until the young version of him became a Solo Mayor (one of the cities in Indonesia) and now a president. On several occasions, he frequently mentioned that his achievement would not have happened if he did not believe in his dream and strive for it. On the other hand, there are several drawbacks, like the tendency to blame themselves and just play it safe. These people will question why they fail when some people get what they want. As a result, they tend to have low self-confidence. If this happens, either they will limit their opportunity by not taking any risks or, in the worst case, these young people will end their lives. For instance, it was reported that a lot of Korean students who choose to be ordinary sellers give up on their dreams because they no longer believe in their self-worth. Besides, in the worst case, young generations decided to commit suicide just because they could not enter the universities that they wished for. To conclude, having unlimited dreams and shaping them to have high self-esteem are the benefits of telling the juvenils that they can accomplish their desired things by struggling enough. However, it can cause some drawbacks, such as making them a safe player, and they will blame themselves if they are unable to get those things. Your grammatical range score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disanvantages of giving children this message? Anwser: It is common for many cultures to tell the youth that they can get anything they want as long as they struggle enough. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits first, then describe the disadvantages of this message. On the one hand, telling young people such a message has some benefits. First, they will have unlimited dreams. This is down to young generations having the motivation that everything is possible. For example, nowadays, most of the unprivileged students in Indonesia are successful in entering the Ivy League universities, such as Columbia, Stanford, and Harvard. Furthermore, this kind of message can lead young people to be highly confident about their future. Take Jokowi, for example; he was nothing until the young version of him became a Solo Mayor (one of the cities in Indonesia) and now a president. On several occasions, he frequently mentioned that his achievement would not have happened if he did not believe in his dream and strive for it. On the other hand, there are several drawbacks, like the tendency to blame themselves and just play it safe. These people will question why they fail when some people get what they want. As a result, they tend to have low self-confidence. If this happens, either they will limit their opportunity by not taking any risks or, in the worst case, these young people will end their lives. For instance, it was reported that a lot of Korean students who choose to be ordinary sellers give up on their dreams because they no longer believe in their self-worth. Besides, in the worst case, young generations decided to commit suicide just because they could not enter the universities that they wished for. To conclude, having unlimited dreams and shaping them to have high self-esteem are the benefits of telling the juvenils that they can accomplish their desired things by struggling enough. However, it can cause some drawbacks, such as making them a safe player, and they will blame themselves if they are unable to get those things. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is suggested that the public funding should go into the public service sector rather than investing in the arts. I firmly agree with this idea because it makes people live a better life and helps deprived residents. First of all, investing in the public sector can improve the quality of services that people receive, it is because , with insufficient funds, many public services are struggling with underfunded situations, which impact the quality of services negatively. For instance, many not-for-profit organisations, such as community engagement, disability support and aged care services have to shut down or reject new applications due to the lack of government funding. Hence, it is crucial for the authorities to allocate money to the public sector in order to maintain the above services to the residents. Another reason why the government investment should be distributed to public services is that it helps to narrow the gap between the haves and have-nots. The disadvantaged group is usually facing financial hardship which hinders them from seeking help. However, with the funds from the government, many of the deprived people can enjoy the free-of-charge services without worrying about their financial status. For instance, free health care is available to low-income families in many European countries, as their governments distribute a large portion of the tax revenue into public services. In conclusion, it is wiser that government should invest in services to the public as it improves the living standard of the overall population and helps to close the gap between the rich and poor. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is suggested that the public funding should go into the public service sector rather than investing in the arts. I firmly agree with this idea because it makes people live a better life and helps deprived residents. First of all, investing in the public sector can improve the quality of services that people receive, it is because , with insufficient funds, many public services are struggling with underfunded situations, which impact the quality of services negatively. For instance, many not-for-profit organisations, such as community engagement, disability support and aged care services have to shut down or reject new applications due to the lack of government funding. Hence, it is crucial for the authorities to allocate money to the public sector in order to maintain the above services to the residents. Another reason why the government investment should be distributed to public services is that it helps to narrow the gap between the haves and have-nots. The disadvantaged group is usually facing financial hardship which hinders them from seeking help. However, with the funds from the government, many of the deprived people can enjoy the free-of-charge services without worrying about their financial status. For instance, free health care is available to low-income families in many European countries, as their governments distribute a large portion of the tax revenue into public services. In conclusion, it is wiser that government should invest in services to the public as it improves the living standard of the overall population and helps to close the gap between the rich and poor. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is suggested that the public funding should go into the public service sector rather than investing in the arts. I firmly agree with this idea because it makes people live a better life and helps deprived residents. First of all, investing in the public sector can improve the quality of services that people receive, it is because , with insufficient funds, many public services are struggling with underfunded situations, which impact the quality of services negatively. For instance, many not-for-profit organisations, such as community engagement, disability support and aged care services have to shut down or reject new applications due to the lack of government funding. Hence, it is crucial for the authorities to allocate money to the public sector in order to maintain the above services to the residents. Another reason why the government investment should be distributed to public services is that it helps to narrow the gap between the haves and have-nots. The disadvantaged group is usually facing financial hardship which hinders them from seeking help. However, with the funds from the government, many of the deprived people can enjoy the free-of-charge services without worrying about their financial status. For instance, free health care is available to low-income families in many European countries, as their governments distribute a large portion of the tax revenue into public services. In conclusion, it is wiser that government should invest in services to the public as it improves the living standard of the overall population and helps to close the gap between the rich and poor. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is suggested that the public funding should go into the public service sector rather than investing in the arts. I firmly agree with this idea because it makes people live a better life and helps deprived residents. First of all, investing in the public sector can improve the quality of services that people receive, it is because , with insufficient funds, many public services are struggling with underfunded situations, which impact the quality of services negatively. For instance, many not-for-profit organisations, such as community engagement, disability support and aged care services have to shut down or reject new applications due to the lack of government funding. Hence, it is crucial for the authorities to allocate money to the public sector in order to maintain the above services to the residents. Another reason why the government investment should be distributed to public services is that it helps to narrow the gap between the haves and have-nots. The disadvantaged group is usually facing financial hardship which hinders them from seeking help. However, with the funds from the government, many of the deprived people can enjoy the free-of-charge services without worrying about their financial status. For instance, free health care is available to low-income families in many European countries, as their governments distribute a large portion of the tax revenue into public services. In conclusion, it is wiser that government should invest in services to the public as it improves the living standard of the overall population and helps to close the gap between the rich and poor. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, children watch a lot of TV and play video games. However, some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child’s mental health Anwser: In modern society, it is much easier for children to get computer games and spend more time on TV than before. Besides, parents are busy finishing and handling their work. As a result, they do not have enough time to accompany their children. And parents will use TV and games to accompany their children. Thus, children waste a lot of time on this electronic entertainment. Is it a negative effect on children's mental abilities? To me, I agree with this point. I think watching TV and playing computer games are negative on children's mental abilities. First of all, watching TV and playing computer games cause children to reduce thinking. TV programs and computer games provide numerous images and sounds. Children do not have the opportunity to imagine and create their thinking. They lose the opportunity to think and grow up. It will affect children's mental abilities. By contrast, activities like reading or drawing develop many areas of the brain and help children to think and imagine. In the second place, children will decrease interaction with other people because of spending much time watching TV and playing computer games. When children spend a lot of time watching TV and playing computer games all day, they will not have time and the opportunity to play outdoors with other people. Physical activity also helps with brain development. Therefore, children should be discouraged from watching TV and playing computer games. To conclude, our bodies and minds need to move and think. If we stop them moving, our bodies and minds will get worse. Therefore, we should help children's mental abilities through reading and drawing instead of spending too much time watching TV and playing computer games. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, children watch a lot of TV and play video games. However, some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child’s mental health Anwser: In modern society, it is much easier for children to get computer games and spend more time on TV than before. Besides, parents are busy finishing and handling their work. As a result, they do not have enough time to accompany their children. And parents will use TV and games to accompany their children. Thus, children waste a lot of time on this electronic entertainment. Is it a negative effect on children's mental abilities? To me, I agree with this point. I think watching TV and playing computer games are negative on children's mental abilities. First of all, watching TV and playing computer games cause children to reduce thinking. TV programs and computer games provide numerous images and sounds. Children do not have the opportunity to imagine and create their thinking. They lose the opportunity to think and grow up. It will affect children's mental abilities. By contrast, activities like reading or drawing develop many areas of the brain and help children to think and imagine. In the second place, children will decrease interaction with other people because of spending much time watching TV and playing computer games. When children spend a lot of time watching TV and playing computer games all day, they will not have time and the opportunity to play outdoors with other people. Physical activity also helps with brain development. Therefore, children should be discouraged from watching TV and playing computer games. To conclude, our bodies and minds need to move and think. If we stop them moving, our bodies and minds will get worse. Therefore, we should help children's mental abilities through reading and drawing instead of spending too much time watching TV and playing computer games. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, children watch a lot of TV and play video games. However, some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child’s mental health Anwser: In modern society, it is much easier for children to get computer games and spend more time on TV than before. Besides, parents are busy finishing and handling their work. As a result, they do not have enough time to accompany their children. And parents will use TV and games to accompany their children. Thus, children waste a lot of time on this electronic entertainment. Is it a negative effect on children's mental abilities? To me, I agree with this point. I think watching TV and playing computer games are negative on children's mental abilities. First of all, watching TV and playing computer games cause children to reduce thinking. TV programs and computer games provide numerous images and sounds. Children do not have the opportunity to imagine and create their thinking. They lose the opportunity to think and grow up. It will affect children's mental abilities. By contrast, activities like reading or drawing develop many areas of the brain and help children to think and imagine. In the second place, children will decrease interaction with other people because of spending much time watching TV and playing computer games. When children spend a lot of time watching TV and playing computer games all day, they will not have time and the opportunity to play outdoors with other people. Physical activity also helps with brain development. Therefore, children should be discouraged from watching TV and playing computer games. To conclude, our bodies and minds need to move and think. If we stop them moving, our bodies and minds will get worse. Therefore, we should help children's mental abilities through reading and drawing instead of spending too much time watching TV and playing computer games. Your grammatical range score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays, children watch a lot of TV and play video games. However, some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child’s mental health Anwser: In modern society, it is much easier for children to get computer games and spend more time on TV than before. Besides, parents are busy finishing and handling their work. As a result, they do not have enough time to accompany their children. And parents will use TV and games to accompany their children. Thus, children waste a lot of time on this electronic entertainment. Is it a negative effect on children's mental abilities? To me, I agree with this point. I think watching TV and playing computer games are negative on children's mental abilities. First of all, watching TV and playing computer games cause children to reduce thinking. TV programs and computer games provide numerous images and sounds. Children do not have the opportunity to imagine and create their thinking. They lose the opportunity to think and grow up. It will affect children's mental abilities. By contrast, activities like reading or drawing develop many areas of the brain and help children to think and imagine. In the second place, children will decrease interaction with other people because of spending much time watching TV and playing computer games. When children spend a lot of time watching TV and playing computer games all day, they will not have time and the opportunity to play outdoors with other people. Physical activity also helps with brain development. Therefore, children should be discouraged from watching TV and playing computer games. To conclude, our bodies and minds need to move and think. If we stop them moving, our bodies and minds will get worse. Therefore, we should help children's mental abilities through reading and drawing instead of spending too much time watching TV and playing computer games. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Anwser: In the modern world, a variety of people use electronic devices for reading newspapers or books. That’s why people don’t need to buy these kinds of things; it’s considered a debatable topic nowadays. Specifically, this topic even grows more significantly when it’s comes to decreasing earnings for this section in groceries. Some people claim that all of us ought to buy printed newspapers or books, especially the older generations; however, others believe that we don’t need to buy something because we can easily get information on social media or our electronic devices. I concur with the second debatable topic for several reasons. To begin with, without a shadow of a doubt, buying printed things in today’s world is a challenging thing for youngsters because they don’t know how to find a book or a newspaper. This is because they don’t need to go to a library or a grocery store. They can easily find whatever they want in online markets. Unfortunately, we can’t say the same thing for the old generation; newspapers are the most precious thing for them. According to an article that I read, some experts say that for an old person, reading newspapers is the most crucial thing they do during the day. Moreover, 80 percent of the elderly spend their money on reading. On the other hand, as I said in the beginning, teenagers don’t need to buy a newspaper because some of them don’t even follow the daily news. According to research, only 20 percent of teenagers follow the daily news day by day. Therefore, the purchasing power of newspapers and books has decreased for the last ten decades. To sum up, I strongly agree that if we want to learn news, we can easily and quickly get it from social media. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Anwser: In the modern world, a variety of people use electronic devices for reading newspapers or books. That’s why people don’t need to buy these kinds of things; it’s considered a debatable topic nowadays. Specifically, this topic even grows more significantly when it’s comes to decreasing earnings for this section in groceries. Some people claim that all of us ought to buy printed newspapers or books, especially the older generations; however, others believe that we don’t need to buy something because we can easily get information on social media or our electronic devices. I concur with the second debatable topic for several reasons. To begin with, without a shadow of a doubt, buying printed things in today’s world is a challenging thing for youngsters because they don’t know how to find a book or a newspaper. This is because they don’t need to go to a library or a grocery store. They can easily find whatever they want in online markets. Unfortunately, we can’t say the same thing for the old generation; newspapers are the most precious thing for them. According to an article that I read, some experts say that for an old person, reading newspapers is the most crucial thing they do during the day. Moreover, 80 percent of the elderly spend their money on reading. On the other hand, as I said in the beginning, teenagers don’t need to buy a newspaper because some of them don’t even follow the daily news. According to research, only 20 percent of teenagers follow the daily news day by day. Therefore, the purchasing power of newspapers and books has decreased for the last ten decades. To sum up, I strongly agree that if we want to learn news, we can easily and quickly get it from social media. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Anwser: In the modern world, a variety of people use electronic devices for reading newspapers or books. That’s why people don’t need to buy these kinds of things; it’s considered a debatable topic nowadays. Specifically, this topic even grows more significantly when it’s comes to decreasing earnings for this section in groceries. Some people claim that all of us ought to buy printed newspapers or books, especially the older generations; however, others believe that we don’t need to buy something because we can easily get information on social media or our electronic devices. I concur with the second debatable topic for several reasons. To begin with, without a shadow of a doubt, buying printed things in today’s world is a challenging thing for youngsters because they don’t know how to find a book or a newspaper. This is because they don’t need to go to a library or a grocery store. They can easily find whatever they want in online markets. Unfortunately, we can’t say the same thing for the old generation; newspapers are the most precious thing for them. According to an article that I read, some experts say that for an old person, reading newspapers is the most crucial thing they do during the day. Moreover, 80 percent of the elderly spend their money on reading. On the other hand, as I said in the beginning, teenagers don’t need to buy a newspaper because some of them don’t even follow the daily news. According to research, only 20 percent of teenagers follow the daily news day by day. Therefore, the purchasing power of newspapers and books has decreased for the last ten decades. To sum up, I strongly agree that if we want to learn news, we can easily and quickly get it from social media. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Anwser: In the modern world, a variety of people use electronic devices for reading newspapers or books. That’s why people don’t need to buy these kinds of things; it’s considered a debatable topic nowadays. Specifically, this topic even grows more significantly when it’s comes to decreasing earnings for this section in groceries. Some people claim that all of us ought to buy printed newspapers or books, especially the older generations; however, others believe that we don’t need to buy something because we can easily get information on social media or our electronic devices. I concur with the second debatable topic for several reasons. To begin with, without a shadow of a doubt, buying printed things in today’s world is a challenging thing for youngsters because they don’t know how to find a book or a newspaper. This is because they don’t need to go to a library or a grocery store. They can easily find whatever they want in online markets. Unfortunately, we can’t say the same thing for the old generation; newspapers are the most precious thing for them. According to an article that I read, some experts say that for an old person, reading newspapers is the most crucial thing they do during the day. Moreover, 80 percent of the elderly spend their money on reading. On the other hand, as I said in the beginning, teenagers don’t need to buy a newspaper because some of them don’t even follow the daily news. According to research, only 20 percent of teenagers follow the daily news day by day. Therefore, the purchasing power of newspapers and books has decreased for the last ten decades. To sum up, I strongly agree that if we want to learn news, we can easily and quickly get it from social media. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals present the idea that there should be a certain punishment for any type of crime, while others believe that the circumstances of the criminals and the motive for committing the crime should be considered in deciding on the punishment. I completely agree with the former opinion and my reasons for the same will be presented in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, some people justifiably argue that unintentional crimes can pose a threat to the safety of society. Once a criminal escapes punishment he may be encouraged to commit more crimes. As a result, the citizens of the society are not able to live their lives peacefully. The situation is complicated by the fact that people find it difficult to recognize criminals from normal persons in the city. As a result, the sense of trust can be seriously damaged and this causes major problems for city residents. In other words, people fail to attend social activities, go to their workplaces or even go on holidays. Therefore, a large section of the community will suffer the consquences of not punishing the criminals. On the other hand, another group of people claim that the influencing environmental factors and incentives of criminals to commit crimes should always be taken into consideration before deciding on their punishment. They emphasize that financial issues, family problems etc. are the reasons leading to crime. However, this argument does not convince me because criminals are responsible for their violent acts. They should be discouraged from committing any kind of crime so that the society remains safe. Finally, in my view, punishment can act as a deterrent and prevent the spread of violence in the community. Moreover, fair punishments make the society safer. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals present the idea that there should be a certain punishment for any type of crime, while others believe that the circumstances of the criminals and the motive for committing the crime should be considered in deciding on the punishment. I completely agree with the former opinion and my reasons for the same will be presented in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, some people justifiably argue that unintentional crimes can pose a threat to the safety of society. Once a criminal escapes punishment he may be encouraged to commit more crimes. As a result, the citizens of the society are not able to live their lives peacefully. The situation is complicated by the fact that people find it difficult to recognize criminals from normal persons in the city. As a result, the sense of trust can be seriously damaged and this causes major problems for city residents. In other words, people fail to attend social activities, go to their workplaces or even go on holidays. Therefore, a large section of the community will suffer the consquences of not punishing the criminals. On the other hand, another group of people claim that the influencing environmental factors and incentives of criminals to commit crimes should always be taken into consideration before deciding on their punishment. They emphasize that financial issues, family problems etc. are the reasons leading to crime. However, this argument does not convince me because criminals are responsible for their violent acts. They should be discouraged from committing any kind of crime so that the society remains safe. Finally, in my view, punishment can act as a deterrent and prevent the spread of violence in the community. Moreover, fair punishments make the society safer. Your lexical resource score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals present the idea that there should be a certain punishment for any type of crime, while others believe that the circumstances of the criminals and the motive for committing the crime should be considered in deciding on the punishment. I completely agree with the former opinion and my reasons for the same will be presented in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, some people justifiably argue that unintentional crimes can pose a threat to the safety of society. Once a criminal escapes punishment he may be encouraged to commit more crimes. As a result, the citizens of the society are not able to live their lives peacefully. The situation is complicated by the fact that people find it difficult to recognize criminals from normal persons in the city. As a result, the sense of trust can be seriously damaged and this causes major problems for city residents. In other words, people fail to attend social activities, go to their workplaces or even go on holidays. Therefore, a large section of the community will suffer the consquences of not punishing the criminals. On the other hand, another group of people claim that the influencing environmental factors and incentives of criminals to commit crimes should always be taken into consideration before deciding on their punishment. They emphasize that financial issues, family problems etc. are the reasons leading to crime. However, this argument does not convince me because criminals are responsible for their violent acts. They should be discouraged from committing any kind of crime so that the society remains safe. Finally, in my view, punishment can act as a deterrent and prevent the spread of violence in the community. Moreover, fair punishments make the society safer. Your grammatical range score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals present the idea that there should be a certain punishment for any type of crime, while others believe that the circumstances of the criminals and the motive for committing the crime should be considered in deciding on the punishment. I completely agree with the former opinion and my reasons for the same will be presented in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, some people justifiably argue that unintentional crimes can pose a threat to the safety of society. Once a criminal escapes punishment he may be encouraged to commit more crimes. As a result, the citizens of the society are not able to live their lives peacefully. The situation is complicated by the fact that people find it difficult to recognize criminals from normal persons in the city. As a result, the sense of trust can be seriously damaged and this causes major problems for city residents. In other words, people fail to attend social activities, go to their workplaces or even go on holidays. Therefore, a large section of the community will suffer the consquences of not punishing the criminals. On the other hand, another group of people claim that the influencing environmental factors and incentives of criminals to commit crimes should always be taken into consideration before deciding on their punishment. They emphasize that financial issues, family problems etc. are the reasons leading to crime. However, this argument does not convince me because criminals are responsible for their violent acts. They should be discouraged from committing any kind of crime so that the society remains safe. Finally, in my view, punishment can act as a deterrent and prevent the spread of violence in the community. Moreover, fair punishments make the society safer. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Government should spend tax money on public libraries rather than public transportation improvements. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Anwser: In today’s fast-paced world, spending taxes on public libraries and transportation has become a vital issue. Personally, I partially agree with this appointment because there are some reasons why I think like that. I completely believe that investing money in public libraries by the government can be more beneficial, while it is crucial for also public transportation. One of the most significant and major reasons why I think so is that recent scientific research shows that approximately 78% of people claim that the government should spend their money which comes from taxes for improving library facilities because some people cannot afford to study at homes as they do not have any kind of resources to learn new information in their field. So, they need to go to public libraries, and find appropriate books or other types of sources to do some research. As for online research, nearly half of the young generations who come from poor families cannot pay a fee for the network. It is optimal that if the government spend taxes on libraries, this time more people may utilize this staff’s amenities, including using technological appliances in order to search a relevant website. However, using money on means of transportation can be an ideal way to supply people with a comfortable environment. A growing number of people believe that it is more prevalent to get more opportunities on public transport as their numbers are limited. For example, some people, including me argue that it is the better option for preventing crowded places which are caused by having more people than necessary. In addition, some people do not have any money to utilize public transport like buses, or underground. It can be the better way, if poor people do not have to pay any money for consuming transport. In conclusion, I believe that both aspects are important to make our life a brilliant and beautiful place to live. Therefore, the government should spend tax money on both public libraries and transport. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Government should spend tax money on public libraries rather than public transportation improvements. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Anwser: In today’s fast-paced world, spending taxes on public libraries and transportation has become a vital issue. Personally, I partially agree with this appointment because there are some reasons why I think like that. I completely believe that investing money in public libraries by the government can be more beneficial, while it is crucial for also public transportation. One of the most significant and major reasons why I think so is that recent scientific research shows that approximately 78% of people claim that the government should spend their money which comes from taxes for improving library facilities because some people cannot afford to study at homes as they do not have any kind of resources to learn new information in their field. So, they need to go to public libraries, and find appropriate books or other types of sources to do some research. As for online research, nearly half of the young generations who come from poor families cannot pay a fee for the network. It is optimal that if the government spend taxes on libraries, this time more people may utilize this staff’s amenities, including using technological appliances in order to search a relevant website. However, using money on means of transportation can be an ideal way to supply people with a comfortable environment. A growing number of people believe that it is more prevalent to get more opportunities on public transport as their numbers are limited. For example, some people, including me argue that it is the better option for preventing crowded places which are caused by having more people than necessary. In addition, some people do not have any money to utilize public transport like buses, or underground. It can be the better way, if poor people do not have to pay any money for consuming transport. In conclusion, I believe that both aspects are important to make our life a brilliant and beautiful place to live. Therefore, the government should spend tax money on both public libraries and transport. Your lexical resource score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Government should spend tax money on public libraries rather than public transportation improvements. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Anwser: In today’s fast-paced world, spending taxes on public libraries and transportation has become a vital issue. Personally, I partially agree with this appointment because there are some reasons why I think like that. I completely believe that investing money in public libraries by the government can be more beneficial, while it is crucial for also public transportation. One of the most significant and major reasons why I think so is that recent scientific research shows that approximately 78% of people claim that the government should spend their money which comes from taxes for improving library facilities because some people cannot afford to study at homes as they do not have any kind of resources to learn new information in their field. So, they need to go to public libraries, and find appropriate books or other types of sources to do some research. As for online research, nearly half of the young generations who come from poor families cannot pay a fee for the network. It is optimal that if the government spend taxes on libraries, this time more people may utilize this staff’s amenities, including using technological appliances in order to search a relevant website. However, using money on means of transportation can be an ideal way to supply people with a comfortable environment. A growing number of people believe that it is more prevalent to get more opportunities on public transport as their numbers are limited. For example, some people, including me argue that it is the better option for preventing crowded places which are caused by having more people than necessary. In addition, some people do not have any money to utilize public transport like buses, or underground. It can be the better way, if poor people do not have to pay any money for consuming transport. In conclusion, I believe that both aspects are important to make our life a brilliant and beautiful place to live. Therefore, the government should spend tax money on both public libraries and transport. Your grammatical range score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Government should spend tax money on public libraries rather than public transportation improvements. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Anwser: In today’s fast-paced world, spending taxes on public libraries and transportation has become a vital issue. Personally, I partially agree with this appointment because there are some reasons why I think like that. I completely believe that investing money in public libraries by the government can be more beneficial, while it is crucial for also public transportation. One of the most significant and major reasons why I think so is that recent scientific research shows that approximately 78% of people claim that the government should spend their money which comes from taxes for improving library facilities because some people cannot afford to study at homes as they do not have any kind of resources to learn new information in their field. So, they need to go to public libraries, and find appropriate books or other types of sources to do some research. As for online research, nearly half of the young generations who come from poor families cannot pay a fee for the network. It is optimal that if the government spend taxes on libraries, this time more people may utilize this staff’s amenities, including using technological appliances in order to search a relevant website. However, using money on means of transportation can be an ideal way to supply people with a comfortable environment. A growing number of people believe that it is more prevalent to get more opportunities on public transport as their numbers are limited. For example, some people, including me argue that it is the better option for preventing crowded places which are caused by having more people than necessary. In addition, some people do not have any money to utilize public transport like buses, or underground. It can be the better way, if poor people do not have to pay any money for consuming transport. In conclusion, I believe that both aspects are important to make our life a brilliant and beautiful place to live. Therefore, the government should spend tax money on both public libraries and transport. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an aging population creates problems for government. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an aging population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: Nowadays, the global population is experiencing a noticeable increase in life expectancy, particularly among the elderly demographic. While some argue that the growth of ageing individuals may pose a challenge, others contend that it brings drawbacks. In my view, I believe the advantages of the rising elderly population outweigh the disadvantages, and this will be discussed in the following paragraphs. On one hand, there are significant benefits both in developing and developed nations. Nevertheless, ageing people not only possess valuable skills and experiences but also have portable investments. For example, the Taiwanese government has proactively extended the retirement age of elderly individuals to address the workforce shortage. It is evident that the rising number of the ageing population indeed bolsters the labour force and stimulates economic growth. Therefore, the growth of the elderly populace fosters the overall economy. On the other hand, the increasing number of ageing people brings negative consequences. For instance, Taiwan has recently encountered challenges due to its increasing elderly population, resulting in strains on healthcare systems and caregiver burdens. It is not only Taiwan but the entire world that must address these issues effectively to achieve a balanced society. Thus, the growing number of elderly individuals may pose worldwide hurdles and evolve into complicated solutions. In conclusion, while the growing elderly populace presents both advantages and disadvantages, I firmly advocate that the benefits of increasing the number of elderly individuals outweigh the drawbacks. It is imperative for governments to tackle these obstacles effectively and strive for societal equilibrium. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an aging population creates problems for government. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an aging population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: Nowadays, the global population is experiencing a noticeable increase in life expectancy, particularly among the elderly demographic. While some argue that the growth of ageing individuals may pose a challenge, others contend that it brings drawbacks. In my view, I believe the advantages of the rising elderly population outweigh the disadvantages, and this will be discussed in the following paragraphs. On one hand, there are significant benefits both in developing and developed nations. Nevertheless, ageing people not only possess valuable skills and experiences but also have portable investments. For example, the Taiwanese government has proactively extended the retirement age of elderly individuals to address the workforce shortage. It is evident that the rising number of the ageing population indeed bolsters the labour force and stimulates economic growth. Therefore, the growth of the elderly populace fosters the overall economy. On the other hand, the increasing number of ageing people brings negative consequences. For instance, Taiwan has recently encountered challenges due to its increasing elderly population, resulting in strains on healthcare systems and caregiver burdens. It is not only Taiwan but the entire world that must address these issues effectively to achieve a balanced society. Thus, the growing number of elderly individuals may pose worldwide hurdles and evolve into complicated solutions. In conclusion, while the growing elderly populace presents both advantages and disadvantages, I firmly advocate that the benefits of increasing the number of elderly individuals outweigh the drawbacks. It is imperative for governments to tackle these obstacles effectively and strive for societal equilibrium. Your lexical resource score is 8.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an aging population creates problems for government. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an aging population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: Nowadays, the global population is experiencing a noticeable increase in life expectancy, particularly among the elderly demographic. While some argue that the growth of ageing individuals may pose a challenge, others contend that it brings drawbacks. In my view, I believe the advantages of the rising elderly population outweigh the disadvantages, and this will be discussed in the following paragraphs. On one hand, there are significant benefits both in developing and developed nations. Nevertheless, ageing people not only possess valuable skills and experiences but also have portable investments. For example, the Taiwanese government has proactively extended the retirement age of elderly individuals to address the workforce shortage. It is evident that the rising number of the ageing population indeed bolsters the labour force and stimulates economic growth. Therefore, the growth of the elderly populace fosters the overall economy. On the other hand, the increasing number of ageing people brings negative consequences. For instance, Taiwan has recently encountered challenges due to its increasing elderly population, resulting in strains on healthcare systems and caregiver burdens. It is not only Taiwan but the entire world that must address these issues effectively to achieve a balanced society. Thus, the growing number of elderly individuals may pose worldwide hurdles and evolve into complicated solutions. In conclusion, while the growing elderly populace presents both advantages and disadvantages, I firmly advocate that the benefits of increasing the number of elderly individuals outweigh the drawbacks. It is imperative for governments to tackle these obstacles effectively and strive for societal equilibrium. Your grammatical range score is 9.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an aging population creates problems for government. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an aging population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: Nowadays, the global population is experiencing a noticeable increase in life expectancy, particularly among the elderly demographic. While some argue that the growth of ageing individuals may pose a challenge, others contend that it brings drawbacks. In my view, I believe the advantages of the rising elderly population outweigh the disadvantages, and this will be discussed in the following paragraphs. On one hand, there are significant benefits both in developing and developed nations. Nevertheless, ageing people not only possess valuable skills and experiences but also have portable investments. For example, the Taiwanese government has proactively extended the retirement age of elderly individuals to address the workforce shortage. It is evident that the rising number of the ageing population indeed bolsters the labour force and stimulates economic growth. Therefore, the growth of the elderly populace fosters the overall economy. On the other hand, the increasing number of ageing people brings negative consequences. For instance, Taiwan has recently encountered challenges due to its increasing elderly population, resulting in strains on healthcare systems and caregiver burdens. It is not only Taiwan but the entire world that must address these issues effectively to achieve a balanced society. Thus, the growing number of elderly individuals may pose worldwide hurdles and evolve into complicated solutions. In conclusion, while the growing elderly populace presents both advantages and disadvantages, I firmly advocate that the benefits of increasing the number of elderly individuals outweigh the drawbacks. It is imperative for governments to tackle these obstacles effectively and strive for societal equilibrium. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Parents are in a crucial position of affecting their children directly and it is acknowledged parenting is important in children’s development. So, I totally disagree with this statement. Of course, parents can help with their kid’s homework, but children should have to learn self-management and problem-solving abilities. These days, it is on the table that children are becoming too much dependent on their parents. They learn how to manage themselves from their parent’s behavior and how their parents treat them. Spending time with their children is important. Therefore, parents should spend time with their kids in a productive and efficient way. For example, going for a walk in the park, having dinner together, or doing something active and enjoyable, not helping homework. Futhermore, they need to improve problem-solving skills when they are young. They can realize how can they solve various problems more wisely and efficiently later on. Thus, they would be able to deal with any problem or concern they may face such as those related to relationship or work. For instance, they can learn many things when they do homework by themselves, such as societal, mathematical, scientific, even cultural concepts. Children can learn how to approach each problem when they are doing assignments alone. Parents could encourage their kids to discuss with other prople when they face difficult problems or don’t have any clue about them. In conclusion, I do not agree that parents should help their kids with their homework. So, children should finish homework, and parents should encourage them to develop their independence and problem-solving skills. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Parents are in a crucial position of affecting their children directly and it is acknowledged parenting is important in children’s development. So, I totally disagree with this statement. Of course, parents can help with their kid’s homework, but children should have to learn self-management and problem-solving abilities. These days, it is on the table that children are becoming too much dependent on their parents. They learn how to manage themselves from their parent’s behavior and how their parents treat them. Spending time with their children is important. Therefore, parents should spend time with their kids in a productive and efficient way. For example, going for a walk in the park, having dinner together, or doing something active and enjoyable, not helping homework. Futhermore, they need to improve problem-solving skills when they are young. They can realize how can they solve various problems more wisely and efficiently later on. Thus, they would be able to deal with any problem or concern they may face such as those related to relationship or work. For instance, they can learn many things when they do homework by themselves, such as societal, mathematical, scientific, even cultural concepts. Children can learn how to approach each problem when they are doing assignments alone. Parents could encourage their kids to discuss with other prople when they face difficult problems or don’t have any clue about them. In conclusion, I do not agree that parents should help their kids with their homework. So, children should finish homework, and parents should encourage them to develop their independence and problem-solving skills. Your lexical resource score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Parents are in a crucial position of affecting their children directly and it is acknowledged parenting is important in children’s development. So, I totally disagree with this statement. Of course, parents can help with their kid’s homework, but children should have to learn self-management and problem-solving abilities. These days, it is on the table that children are becoming too much dependent on their parents. They learn how to manage themselves from their parent’s behavior and how their parents treat them. Spending time with their children is important. Therefore, parents should spend time with their kids in a productive and efficient way. For example, going for a walk in the park, having dinner together, or doing something active and enjoyable, not helping homework. Futhermore, they need to improve problem-solving skills when they are young. They can realize how can they solve various problems more wisely and efficiently later on. Thus, they would be able to deal with any problem or concern they may face such as those related to relationship or work. For instance, they can learn many things when they do homework by themselves, such as societal, mathematical, scientific, even cultural concepts. Children can learn how to approach each problem when they are doing assignments alone. Parents could encourage their kids to discuss with other prople when they face difficult problems or don’t have any clue about them. In conclusion, I do not agree that parents should help their kids with their homework. So, children should finish homework, and parents should encourage them to develop their independence and problem-solving skills. Your grammatical range score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Parents are in a crucial position of affecting their children directly and it is acknowledged parenting is important in children’s development. So, I totally disagree with this statement. Of course, parents can help with their kid’s homework, but children should have to learn self-management and problem-solving abilities. These days, it is on the table that children are becoming too much dependent on their parents. They learn how to manage themselves from their parent’s behavior and how their parents treat them. Spending time with their children is important. Therefore, parents should spend time with their kids in a productive and efficient way. For example, going for a walk in the park, having dinner together, or doing something active and enjoyable, not helping homework. Futhermore, they need to improve problem-solving skills when they are young. They can realize how can they solve various problems more wisely and efficiently later on. Thus, they would be able to deal with any problem or concern they may face such as those related to relationship or work. For instance, they can learn many things when they do homework by themselves, such as societal, mathematical, scientific, even cultural concepts. Children can learn how to approach each problem when they are doing assignments alone. Parents could encourage their kids to discuss with other prople when they face difficult problems or don’t have any clue about them. In conclusion, I do not agree that parents should help their kids with their homework. So, children should finish homework, and parents should encourage them to develop their independence and problem-solving skills. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays,many people choose to be self-employed,rather than to work for a company or organisation. why might this be the case? what could be the disadvantage of being self-employed? Anwser: Currently, many individuals opt to run their own businesses instead of working for a particular organization. From my point of view, this viewpoint may be a negative trend, which provides some drawbacks. The major reason why folks prefer to be self-employed rather than to work for a certain company is that the income that they obtain from doing a routine job is not enough. To illustrate, in Thailand, the minimum rate of salaries for those who have a bachelor's degree is 15,000 baths per month. As a result, a lot of people who have recently graduated from universities chose to be self-employed. Furthermore, many people would not like to encounter the awful working atmosphere. In other words, some office workers can not be tolerant of unfavourable behavior of their bosses and co-workers. As a consequence, they decided to resign and begin to run their own businesses. One of the obvious disadvantages of being self-employed is that business owners must address numerous hardships by themselves. In simple terms, if they face any problems, they have to find solutions to tackle those issues by themselves. On top of that, business owners still have some expenditures even if their businesses experience a financial loss. That is to say, although their businesses do not have profits, they still have to pay for their employees, raw materials, and even the rent in some cases. To summarize, there are numerous reasons why people presently choose to run thier own businesses rather than doing a routine job, and this trend may offer some disadvantages. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays,many people choose to be self-employed,rather than to work for a company or organisation. why might this be the case? what could be the disadvantage of being self-employed? Anwser: Currently, many individuals opt to run their own businesses instead of working for a particular organization. From my point of view, this viewpoint may be a negative trend, which provides some drawbacks. The major reason why folks prefer to be self-employed rather than to work for a certain company is that the income that they obtain from doing a routine job is not enough. To illustrate, in Thailand, the minimum rate of salaries for those who have a bachelor's degree is 15,000 baths per month. As a result, a lot of people who have recently graduated from universities chose to be self-employed. Furthermore, many people would not like to encounter the awful working atmosphere. In other words, some office workers can not be tolerant of unfavourable behavior of their bosses and co-workers. As a consequence, they decided to resign and begin to run their own businesses. One of the obvious disadvantages of being self-employed is that business owners must address numerous hardships by themselves. In simple terms, if they face any problems, they have to find solutions to tackle those issues by themselves. On top of that, business owners still have some expenditures even if their businesses experience a financial loss. That is to say, although their businesses do not have profits, they still have to pay for their employees, raw materials, and even the rent in some cases. To summarize, there are numerous reasons why people presently choose to run thier own businesses rather than doing a routine job, and this trend may offer some disadvantages. Your lexical resource score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays,many people choose to be self-employed,rather than to work for a company or organisation. why might this be the case? what could be the disadvantage of being self-employed? Anwser: Currently, many individuals opt to run their own businesses instead of working for a particular organization. From my point of view, this viewpoint may be a negative trend, which provides some drawbacks. The major reason why folks prefer to be self-employed rather than to work for a certain company is that the income that they obtain from doing a routine job is not enough. To illustrate, in Thailand, the minimum rate of salaries for those who have a bachelor's degree is 15,000 baths per month. As a result, a lot of people who have recently graduated from universities chose to be self-employed. Furthermore, many people would not like to encounter the awful working atmosphere. In other words, some office workers can not be tolerant of unfavourable behavior of their bosses and co-workers. As a consequence, they decided to resign and begin to run their own businesses. One of the obvious disadvantages of being self-employed is that business owners must address numerous hardships by themselves. In simple terms, if they face any problems, they have to find solutions to tackle those issues by themselves. On top of that, business owners still have some expenditures even if their businesses experience a financial loss. That is to say, although their businesses do not have profits, they still have to pay for their employees, raw materials, and even the rent in some cases. To summarize, there are numerous reasons why people presently choose to run thier own businesses rather than doing a routine job, and this trend may offer some disadvantages. Your grammatical range score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays,many people choose to be self-employed,rather than to work for a company or organisation. why might this be the case? what could be the disadvantage of being self-employed? Anwser: Currently, many individuals opt to run their own businesses instead of working for a particular organization. From my point of view, this viewpoint may be a negative trend, which provides some drawbacks. The major reason why folks prefer to be self-employed rather than to work for a certain company is that the income that they obtain from doing a routine job is not enough. To illustrate, in Thailand, the minimum rate of salaries for those who have a bachelor's degree is 15,000 baths per month. As a result, a lot of people who have recently graduated from universities chose to be self-employed. Furthermore, many people would not like to encounter the awful working atmosphere. In other words, some office workers can not be tolerant of unfavourable behavior of their bosses and co-workers. As a consequence, they decided to resign and begin to run their own businesses. One of the obvious disadvantages of being self-employed is that business owners must address numerous hardships by themselves. In simple terms, if they face any problems, they have to find solutions to tackle those issues by themselves. On top of that, business owners still have some expenditures even if their businesses experience a financial loss. That is to say, although their businesses do not have profits, they still have to pay for their employees, raw materials, and even the rent in some cases. To summarize, there are numerous reasons why people presently choose to run thier own businesses rather than doing a routine job, and this trend may offer some disadvantages. Your task achievement score is 6.0