text
stringlengths 0
512
|
---|
research: a journal of the international cannabinoid research society |
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res |
2019;4:259–264 |
Journal of Voice, Vol |
xx, No |
xx, xxxx 8 |
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at McMaster University from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 08, |
2023 |
For personal use only |
No other uses without permission |
Copyright ©2023 |
Elsevier Inc |
All rights reserved. |
Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma Subepithelial Infusion for Vocal Fold |
Scar, Sulcus, and Atrophy |
Benjamin van der Woerd, MD; Karla O ’Dell, MD; Carlos X Castellanos, MS ; Neel Bhatt, MD; |
Yael Benssousan, MD ; Neha K Reddy, BA; Timothy Blood, MD; Dinesh K Chhetri, MD; |
Michael M Johns III MD |
Objective: To demonstrate the safety pro file of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an injectable therapeutic for the treatment |
of vocal fold scarring and atrophy. |
Methods: Preliminary report on a prospective clinical tr ial of p |
atients with vocal fold scar or atrophy |
undergoing unilateral vocal fold subepithelial infusion with autologous PRP |
Enrolled patients underwent four sub- |
epithelial injections spaced 1 month apart |
Adverse event s were assessed peri and post-injection at each session. |
Patient-reported outcomes were collected at every visit us ing the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Vocal Fatigue |
Index (VFI) questionnaires. |
Results: Twelve patients underwent unilateral vocal fold injection with autologous PRP prepared according to Eclipse |
PRP®system protocol |
Forty-three injections were performed using a peroral or percutaneous approach |
An average of |
1.57/C60.4 cc (range 0.6 –2.0 cc) injectate was used |
All patients tolerated the procedure without dif ficulty or peri-procedural |
complications |
The average duration of follow-up was 3.6 /C61.8 months |
No signi ficant in flammatory reactions or adverse |
events were seen to date |
There was statistically signi ficant improvement in patient-reported outcomes at the 3 month follow |
up ( n=9) follow-up (mean ΔVHI-10 =10.8, p< 0.001, mean ΔVFI=18.9, p=0.01, ttest, paired two sample for means, two- |
tail) |
All nine patients who completed the series of four injections subjectively (yes/no) reported they were satis fied with the |
results. |
Conclusion: This prospective study cohort demonstrated a favorable safety pro file, with no adverse events or |
peri-procedural complications |
Subjective improvements in vocal quality and reduction in vocal fatigue need to be clinically |
correlated with further study. |
Key Words: platelet-rich plasma, vocal fold scar, super ficial lamina propria, vocal fold atrophy. |
Level of Evidence: 4 |
Laryngoscope , 133:647 –653, 2023 |
INTRODUCTION |
Vocal fold atrophy and scar are causes of dysphonia |
that pose major treatment challenges for laryngologists.1 |
The etiology of vocal fold scar is diverse, potentially stem-ming from phonotrauma, phonomicrosurgery, iatrogen |
ic |
injury, malignancy, and radiation therapy. |
2,3Addition- |
ally, loss of hyaluronic acid, elastic fibers, and lubrication |
during the aging process can reduce viable tissue mass.4 |
Underlying alterations to the super ficial lamina propria |
(SLP) of the vocal folds drastically alter compliance.5Con- |
sequently, patients endure considerable dysphonia, vocal |
fatigue, decreased volume, and altered pitch |
These |
changes can contribute to depression, reduced social |
interaction, and decreased quality of life.6 |
The most common initial treatment for vocal fold atro- |
phy condition is voice therapy administered by a specialized |
speech-language pathologist spaced out over multiple |
monthly sessions |
Voice therapy introduces logistical strains |
in the elderly population, such as coordinating tr ansportation |
across several sessions, and is limited by its inability to |
restore normal vocal fold volume and morphology.5Alterna- |
tively, injectable filler materials (e.g., carboxymethylcellulose |
and micronized collagen) may be used to augment the vocal |
folds for patients with glottic insuf ficiency secondary to loss of |
the SLP.7However, this treatment is temporary and fails toThis is an open access article under t |
he terms of the Creative |
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits |
use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is prop- |
erly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modi fications or adaptations |
are made. |
From the USC Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology – |
Head & Neck Surgery ( B.V.D.W.,K.O.,M.M.J.), University of Southern |
California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.; Department of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery ( |
C.X.C.), Keck School of Medicine of the Un |
iversity |
of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.; Department ofOtolaryngology –Head & Neck Surgery ( |
N.B.), University of Washington |
School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.; USF Health Voice |
Center, Department of Otolaryngology –Head & Neck Surgery ( Y.B.), |
University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA; Department ofHead and Neck Surgery ( |
N.K.R.), David Geffen School of Medicine at the |
University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.; and the Division ofHead and Neck Sur |
gery ( |
T.B.,D.K.C.), David Geffen School of Medicine |
at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. |
Editor ’s Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on |
June 6, 2022. |