text
stringlengths 0
512
|
---|
research: a journal of the international cannabinoid research society
|
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res
|
2019;4:259–264
|
Journal of Voice, Vol
|
xx, No
|
xx, xxxx 8
|
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at McMaster University from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 08,
|
2023
|
For personal use only
|
No other uses without permission
|
Copyright ©2023
|
Elsevier Inc
|
All rights reserved.
|
Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma Subepithelial Infusion for Vocal Fold
|
Scar, Sulcus, and Atrophy
|
Benjamin van der Woerd, MD; Karla O ’Dell, MD; Carlos X Castellanos, MS ; Neel Bhatt, MD;
|
Yael Benssousan, MD ; Neha K Reddy, BA; Timothy Blood, MD; Dinesh K Chhetri, MD;
|
Michael M Johns III MD
|
Objective: To demonstrate the safety pro file of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an injectable therapeutic for the treatment
|
of vocal fold scarring and atrophy.
|
Methods: Preliminary report on a prospective clinical tr ial of p
|
atients with vocal fold scar or atrophy
|
undergoing unilateral vocal fold subepithelial infusion with autologous PRP
|
Enrolled patients underwent four sub-
|
epithelial injections spaced 1 month apart
|
Adverse event s were assessed peri and post-injection at each session.
|
Patient-reported outcomes were collected at every visit us ing the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Vocal Fatigue
|
Index (VFI) questionnaires.
|
Results: Twelve patients underwent unilateral vocal fold injection with autologous PRP prepared according to Eclipse
|
PRP®system protocol
|
Forty-three injections were performed using a peroral or percutaneous approach
|
An average of
|
1.57/C60.4 cc (range 0.6 –2.0 cc) injectate was used
|
All patients tolerated the procedure without dif ficulty or peri-procedural
|
complications
|
The average duration of follow-up was 3.6 /C61.8 months
|
No signi ficant in flammatory reactions or adverse
|
events were seen to date
|
There was statistically signi ficant improvement in patient-reported outcomes at the 3 month follow
|
up ( n=9) follow-up (mean ΔVHI-10 =10.8, p< 0.001, mean ΔVFI=18.9, p=0.01, ttest, paired two sample for means, two-
|
tail)
|
All nine patients who completed the series of four injections subjectively (yes/no) reported they were satis fied with the
|
results.
|
Conclusion: This prospective study cohort demonstrated a favorable safety pro file, with no adverse events or
|
peri-procedural complications
|
Subjective improvements in vocal quality and reduction in vocal fatigue need to be clinically
|
correlated with further study.
|
Key Words: platelet-rich plasma, vocal fold scar, super ficial lamina propria, vocal fold atrophy.
|
Level of Evidence: 4
|
Laryngoscope , 133:647 –653, 2023
|
INTRODUCTION
|
Vocal fold atrophy and scar are causes of dysphonia
|
that pose major treatment challenges for laryngologists.1
|
The etiology of vocal fold scar is diverse, potentially stem-ming from phonotrauma, phonomicrosurgery, iatrogen
|
ic
|
injury, malignancy, and radiation therapy.
|
2,3Addition-
|
ally, loss of hyaluronic acid, elastic fibers, and lubrication
|
during the aging process can reduce viable tissue mass.4
|
Underlying alterations to the super ficial lamina propria
|
(SLP) of the vocal folds drastically alter compliance.5Con-
|
sequently, patients endure considerable dysphonia, vocal
|
fatigue, decreased volume, and altered pitch
|
These
|
changes can contribute to depression, reduced social
|
interaction, and decreased quality of life.6
|
The most common initial treatment for vocal fold atro-
|
phy condition is voice therapy administered by a specialized
|
speech-language pathologist spaced out over multiple
|
monthly sessions
|
Voice therapy introduces logistical strains
|
in the elderly population, such as coordinating tr ansportation
|
across several sessions, and is limited by its inability to
|
restore normal vocal fold volume and morphology.5Alterna-
|
tively, injectable filler materials (e.g., carboxymethylcellulose
|
and micronized collagen) may be used to augment the vocal
|
folds for patients with glottic insuf ficiency secondary to loss of
|
the SLP.7However, this treatment is temporary and fails toThis is an open access article under t
|
he terms of the Creative
|
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits
|
use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is prop-
|
erly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modi fications or adaptations
|
are made.
|
From the USC Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology –
|
Head & Neck Surgery ( B.V.D.W.,K.O.,M.M.J.), University of Southern
|
California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.; Department of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery (
|
C.X.C.), Keck School of Medicine of the Un
|
iversity
|
of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.; Department ofOtolaryngology –Head & Neck Surgery (
|
N.B.), University of Washington
|
School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.; USF Health Voice
|
Center, Department of Otolaryngology –Head & Neck Surgery ( Y.B.),
|
University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA; Department ofHead and Neck Surgery (
|
N.K.R.), David Geffen School of Medicine at the
|
University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.; and the Division ofHead and Neck Sur
|
gery (
|
T.B.,D.K.C.), David Geffen School of Medicine
|
at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
|
Editor ’s Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on
|
June 6, 2022.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.