topic_shift
bool
2 classes
utterance
stringlengths
1
7.9k
session_id
stringlengths
7
14
false
one is with L_C_D_ and without L_C_D_.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
But who will give the scoring uh we ourself or or a third party ?
QMSum_109
false
You.
QMSum_109
false
According to you , no according to you designers , how will feel does it uh with L_C_D_ and without L_C_D_ ?
QMSum_109
false
Mm.
QMSum_109
false
Okay let us make this L_ and without L_C_D_. On on this scale the L_C_D_ remote control. How do you look how does it look ?
QMSum_109
false
Mm. Mm.
QMSum_109
false
D is it very fancy or doesn't look much fancy ?
QMSum_109
false
Well it doesn't look much fancy I'll I'll say three or four.
QMSum_109
false
And you both agree for that ?
QMSum_109
false
And you ?
QMSum_109
false
I think we can improve on the design.
QMSum_109
false
Som someone um commented this is like a the stone age uh design.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah. It's it it
QMSum_109
false
Um we have been focused all all this time on the on the technical aspect , functional aspect , but also the simplicity.
QMSum_109
false
Technical aspects.
QMSum_109
false
Mm-hmm.
QMSum_109
false
As for the design maybe we c should hire a designer to help .
QMSum_109
false
So I take three on with L_C_D_ ?
QMSum_109
false
Yeah a three.
QMSum_109
false
So without L_C_D_ how would you rate it ?
QMSum_109
false
Yeah .
QMSum_109
false
Uh four. I think it's it's uh more easy to make f fancy things when it's not complicated
QMSum_109
false
Four.
QMSum_109
false
so removing the L_C_D_ um gives us a li more liberty to to have a fancy look.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah. Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
And in the sense of innovativeness , with L_C_D_.
QMSum_109
false
Well it's it's the same for both so I will give a five , six.
QMSum_109
false
Mm.
QMSum_109
false
Five with L_C_D_ and
QMSum_109
false
Well five also uh Norman please.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah
QMSum_109
false
Uh
QMSum_109
false
from the innovation aspect I feel that uh what is most innovative of our prototype compared to the existing prototypes that we saw l in the last meeting is that um the retrieval of T_V_ programmes by content , because uh that is really innovative , and for now and another innovation we have is simplicity and simplicity , few buttons , we've uh A lot of functionalities.
QMSum_109
false
With lot of functionalities.
QMSum_109
false
So that is uh that is uh for both th
QMSum_109
false
So without L_C_D_ ?
QMSum_109
false
Our gi I think that the our our product is uh has the best in all well this is a biased judgement
QMSum_109
false
because we designed them.
QMSum_109
false
No no according to design aspect we want to know how would you feel the innovativeness ?
QMSum_109
false
Yeah. Uh the innovation is v is very high I think.
QMSum_109
false
For L_C_D_.
QMSum_109
false
With L_C_D_.
QMSum_109
false
Both.
QMSum_109
false
And without L_C_D_ ?
QMSum_109
false
Mm for both it's the the same innovations.
QMSum_109
false
For both. It's the same innovation. So maybe I can put six to seven.
QMSum_109
false
Okay.
QMSum_109
false
six , let's go for six.
QMSum_109
false
Without L_C_D_.
QMSum_109
false
Both.
QMSum_109
false
No actually uh to make it with L_C_D_ you make more efforts. So I there is high innovativeness included if you make it with L_C_D_ y
QMSum_109
false
Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
then when it is without L_C_D_ there is not much innovativeness.
QMSum_109
false
Mm.
QMSum_109
false
Uh no innovative yeah.
QMSum_109
false
Uh uh uh there w there was a there was a issue here is that what are what is the display on the L_C_D_ ?
QMSum_109
false
So we can't go
QMSum_109
false
Talk about
QMSum_109
false
We haven't really uh determined what are actually actually
QMSum_109
false
I mean that what you are sayin that's what the design
QMSum_109
false
it's good to have a L_C_D_ but what are we gonna display on a L_C_D_ ?
QMSum_109
false
No it's like this ,
QMSum_109
false
I mean on the L_C_D_ , according to what I understand from your model is , you have a joystick here , and you have L_C_D_ , you just press your joystick , you get here a programme.
QMSum_109
false
So let's remove it.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah ? Yeah. Yeah but
QMSum_109
false
Yeah
QMSum_109
false
But
QMSum_109
false
but you have the same programme on the T_V_ screen.
QMSum_109
false
Uh then
QMSum_109
false
Yes exactly.
QMSum_109
false
This is the problem.
QMSum_109
false
No on the T_V_ you don't it doesn't display on the T_V_ now.
QMSum_109
false
If you have the L_C_D_ , but if n
QMSum_109
false
L_C_D_ ? Then uh there is no meaning in having it on the T_V_.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
Or then again you have a channels , volume and all the stuff and what a
QMSum_109
false
But you cannot display all on a L_C_D_.
QMSum_109
false
I mean that depends upon your design , so
QMSum_109
false
Anyway for for the users who who who opt for L_C_D_ we'll give them the give them the L_C_D_ ,
QMSum_109
false
I mean
QMSum_109
false
we give what the customer uh wants , right.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
So without L_C_D_ you want to put it fi the same level of innovativeness ? And which do you recommend e easy to use , with L_C_D_ or without L_C_D_ ?
QMSum_109
false
Well I think both are really easy to use because there are few button buttons ,
QMSum_109
false
Yeah
QMSum_109
false
and uh well t p the menu are clear , well-organised , so
QMSum_109
false
Yeah. Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
Well with little knowing of the technology you can you can easily use the product
QMSum_109
false
so I will give a six for the easy to use.
QMSum_109
false
Yeah I think
QMSum_109
false
No it's just if I I see the the f the rate I think it's better to do it without L_C_D_.
QMSum_109
false
sorry.
QMSum_109
false
Because that's with L_C_D_ just will increase the price ,
QMSum_109
false
Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
and I thi i they have the same rate so without L_C_D_ it will be
QMSum_109
false
Yeah.
QMSum_109
false
Or we can just go back to the previous slide uh where we ha we have a few updates. So I mean in the product design you could just amend it to make some few changes
QMSum_109