instruction
stringlengths
1
84
input
stringlengths
1
85
output
stringlengths
1
83
6. Where it appears to the Permanent Lok Adalat that there exist
elements of a settlement, which may be acceptable to the
parties, it shall formulate the terms of a possible settlement and
submit them to the parties for their observations and in case the
parties reach an agreement, the Permanent Lok Adalat shall
pass an award in terms thereof. In case parties to the dispute fail
to reach an agreement, the Permanent Lok Adalat shall decide
the dispute on merits.
7. Every award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat shall be final
FAMILY COURTS
The Family Courts Act, 1984 was enacted to provide for the
establishment of Family Courts with a view to promote conciliation and
secure speedy settlement of disputes relating to marriage and family
affairs.
Reasons
The reasons for the establishment of separate Family Courts are as
follows:
1. Several associations of women, other organizations and
individuals have urged, from time to time, that Family Courts, be
set up for the settlement of family disputes, where emphasis
should be laid on conciliation and achieving socially desirable
results and adherence to rigid rules of procedure and evidence
should be eliminated.
2. The Law Commission in its 59th report (1974) had also stressed
that in dealing with disputes concerning the family the Court
ought to adopt an approach radically different from the adopted
in ordinary civil proceedings and that it should make reasonable
efforts at settlement before the commencement of the trial. The
Code of Civil Procedure was amended in 1976 to provide for a
special procedure to be adopted in suits or proceedings relating
to matters concerning the family.
3. However, not much use has been made by the Courts in
adopting this conciliatory procedure and the Courts continue to
deal with family disputes in the same manner as other civil
matters and the same adversary approach prevails. The need
was, therefore, felt, in the public interest, to establish Family
Courts for speedy settlement of family disputes.
Therefore, the main objectives and reasons for setting up of Family
Courts are:10
(i) To create a Specialized Court which will exclusively deal w
family matters so that such a court may have the necess
expertise to deal with these cases expeditiously. Thus exper
and expeditious disposal are two main factors for establish
such a court;
(ii) To institute a mechanism for conciliation of the disputes relatin
(iii) To provide an inexpensive remedy; and
(iv) To have f lexibility and an informal atmosphere in the conduc
proceedings.
Features
The salient features of the Family Courts Act, 1984 are as follows:
1. It provides for the establishment of Family Courts by the State
Governments in consultation with the High Courts.
2. It makes it obligatory on the State Governments to set up a
Family Court in every city or town with a population exceeding
one million.
3. It enables the State Governments to set up Family Courts in
other areas also, if they deem it necessary.
4. It exclusively provides within the jurisdiction of the Family Courts
the matters relating to:
(i) matrimonial relief, including nullity of marriage, judicial separat
divorce, restitution of conjugal rights, or declaration as to
validity of marriage or as to the matrimonial status of any perso
(ii) the property of the spouses or of either of them;
(iii) declaration as to the legitimacy of any person;
(iv) guardianship of a person or the custody of any minor; and
(v) maintenance of wife, children and parents.
5. It makes it obligatory on the part of the Family Court to
endeavour, in the first instance to effect a reconciliation or a
settlement between the parties to a family dispute. During this
stage, the proceedings will be informal and rigid rules of
procedure shall not apply.
6. It provides for the association of social welfare agencies,
counsellors, etc., during conciliation stage and also to secure the
service of medical and welfare experts.
7. It provides that the parties to a dispute before a Family Court
shall not be entitled, as of right, to be represented by legal
practitioner. However, the Court may, in the interest of justice,
seek assistance of a legal expert as amicus curiae.
8. It simplifies the rules of evidence and procedure so as to enable
a Family Court to deal effectively with a dispute.
9. It provides for only one right of appeal which shall lie to the High
GRAM NYAYALAYAS
The Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008 has been enacted to provide for the
establishment of the Gram Nyayalayas at the grass roots level for the
purposes of providing access to justice to the citizens at their
doorsteps and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not
denied to any citizen due to social, economic or other disabilities.
Reasons
The reasons for the establishment of Gram Nyayalayas are as follows:
1. Access to justice by the poor and disadvantaged remains a
worldwide problem despite diverse approaches and strategies
that have been formulated and implemented to address it. In our
country, Article 39A of the Constitution directs the State to
secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice,
on a basis of equal opportunity and shall provide free legal aid to
ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to
any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities.
2. In the recent past, the Government has taken various measures
to strengthen judicial system, inter alia, by simplifying the
procedural laws; incorporating various alternative dispute
resolution mechanisms such as arbitration, conciliation and
mediation; conducting of Lok Adalats, etc. These measures are
required to be strengthened further.
3. The Law Commission of India in its 114th Report on Gram
Nyayalaya suggested establishment of Gram Nyayalayas so that
speedy, inexpensive and substantial justice could be provided to
the common man. The Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008 is broadly
based on the recommendations of the Law Commission.
4. Justice to the poor at their door step is a dream of the poor.
Setting up of Gram Nyayalayas in the rural areas would bring to
the people of rural areas speedy, affordable and substantial
justice.
Features
The salient features of the Gram Nyayalayas Act are as follows11 :
appointed by the State Government in consultation with the High
Court.
2. The Gram Nyayalaya shall be established for every Panchayat
at intermediate level or a group of contiguous Panchayats at
intermediate level in a district or where there is no Panchayat at
intermediate level in any State, for a group of contiguous
Panchayats.
3. The Nyayadhikaris who will preside over these Gram
Nyayalayas are strictly judicial officers and will be drawing the
same salary, deriving the same powers as First Class
Magistrates working under High Courts.
4. The Gram Nyayalaya shall be a mobile court and shall exercise
the powers of both Criminal and Civil Courts.
5. The seat of the Gram Nyayalaya will be located at the
headquarters of the intermediate Panchayat, they will go to
villages, work there and dispose of the cases.
6. The Gram Nyayalaya shall try criminal cases, civil suits, claims
or disputes which are specified in the First Schedule and the
Second Schedule to the Act.
7. The Central as well as the State Governments have been given
power to amend the First Schedule and the Second Schedule of
the Act, as per their respective legislative competence.
8. The Gram Nyayalaya shall follow summary procedure in criminal
trial.
9. The Gram Nyayalaya shall exercise the powers of a Civil Court
with certain modifications and shall follow the special procedure
as provided in the Act.
10. The Gram Nyayalaya shall try to settle the disputes as far as
possible by bringing about conciliation between the parties and
for this purpose, it shall make use of the conciliators to be
appointed for this purpose.
11. The judgment and order passed by the Gram Nyayalaya shall be
deemed to be a decree and to avoid delay in its execution, the
Gram Nyayalaya shall follow summary procedure for its
execution.
12. The Gram Nyayalaya shall not be bound by the rules of
evidence provided in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 but shall be
guided by the principles of natural justice and subject to any rule
made by the High Court.
from the date of filing of such appeal.
14. Appeal in civil cases shall lie to the District Court, which shall be
heard and disposed of within a period of six months from the
date of filing of the appeal.
15. A person accused of an offence may file an application for plea
bargaining.
Establishment
The Central Government has decided to meet the non-recurring
expenditure on the establishment of these Gram Nyayalayas subject
to a ceiling of ₹18.00 lakhs out of which ₹10.00 lakhs is for
construction of the court, ₹5.00 lakhs for vehicle and ₹3.00 lakhs for
office equipment.
More than 5000 Gram Nyayalayas are expected to be set up under
the Act for which the Central Government would provide about ₹1400
crores by way of assistance to the concerned States/Union Territories.
Under of the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008, it is for the State
Governments to establish Gram Nyayalayas in consultation with the
respective High Courts.
Majority of States have now set up regular courts at Taluka level.
Further, reluctance of police officials and other State functionaries to
invoke jurisdiction of Gram Nyayalayas, lukewarm response of the
Bar, non-availability of notaries and stamp vendors, problem of
concurrent jurisdiction of regular courts are other issues indicated by
the States which are coming in the way of operationalization of the
Gram Nyayalayas.
The issues affecting operationalization of the Gram Nyayalayas
were discussed in the Conference of Chief Justices of High Courts
and Chief Ministers of the States in April, 2013. It was decided in the
Conference that the State Government and High Court should decide
the question of establishment of Gram Nyayalayas wherever feasible,
taking into account their local problems. The focus is on setting up
Gram Nayayalayas in the Talukas where regular courts have not been
set up.
NOTES AND REFERENCES
1. The 20th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1966 added a
new Article 233-A which retrospectively validated the
appointment of certain district judges as well as the
judgements delivered by them.
2. In practice, the State Public Service Commission conducts
a competitive examination for recruitment to the judicial
service of the state.
3. A subordinate judge is also known as civil judge (senior
division), civil judge (class I) and so on. He may also be
given the powers of an assistant sessions judge. In such a
case, he combines in himself both civil as well as criminal
powers like that of a District Judge.
4. A munsiff is also known as civil judge (junior division), civil
judge (class-II) and so on.
5. Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta and Madras were formerly called
presidency towns.
6. Annual Report 2015–16, Ministry of Law and Justice,
Government of India, pp.91–92.
7. P.T. Thomas v. Thomas Job (2005).
7a. India 2010 : A Reference Annual, Publications Division,
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of
India, p.711.
8. P.T. Thomas v. Thomas Job (2005).
9. Law Commission of India, Report No.222 entitled as “Need
for Justicedispensation through ADR etc.,” April 2009,
pp.22–23.
10. Annual Report 2015–16, Ministry of Law and Justice,
Government of India, p.85.
11. Press Information Bureau, Government of India, September
37 Special Provisions for Some States
A
rticles 371 to 371-J in Part XXI of the constitution contain
special provisions for twelve states1 viz., Maharashtra, Gujarat,
Nagaland, Assam, Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana,
Sikkim, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Karnataka. The
intention behind them is to meet the aspirations of the people of
backward regions of the states or to protect the cultural and economic
interests of the tribal people of the states or to deal with the disturbed
law and order condition in some parts of the states or to protect the
interests of the local people of the states.
Originally, the constitution did not make any special provisions for
these states. They have been incorporated by the various subsequent
amendments made in the context of reorganisation of the states or
conferment of statehood on the Union Territories.
PROVISIONS FOR MAHARASHTRA AND GUJARAT
Under Article 371, the President is authorised to provide that the
Governor of Maharashtra and that of Gujarat would have special
responsibility for2 :
1. the establishment of separate development boards for (i)
Vidarbha, Marathwada and the rest of Maharashtra, (ii)
Saurashtra, Kutch and the rest of Gujarat;
2. making a provision that a report on the working of these boards
would be placed every year before the State Legislative
Assembly;
3. the equitable allocation of funds for developmental expenditure
over the above-mentioned areas; and
4. an equitable arrangement providing adequate facilities for
technical education and vocational training, and adequate
employment opportunities in the state services in respect of the
PROVISIONS FOR NAGALAND
Article 371-A makes the following special provisions for Nagaland3 :
1. The Acts of Parliament relating to the following matters would
not apply to Nagaland unless the State Legislative Assembly so
decides:
(i) religious or social practices of the Nagas;
(ii) Naga customary law and procedure;
(iii) administration of civil and criminal justice involving decisi
according to Naga customary law; and
(iv) ownership and transfer of land and its resources.
2. The Governor of Nagaland shall have special responsibility for
law and order in the state so long as internal disturbances
caused by the hostile Nagas continue. In the discharge of this
responsibility, the Governor, after consulting the Council of
Ministers, exercises his individual judgement and his decision is
final4. This special responsibility of the Governor shall cease
when the President so directs.
3. The Governor has to ensure that the money provided by the
Central Government for any specific purpose is included in the
demand for a grant relating to that purpose and not in any other
demand moved in the State Legislative Assembly.
4. A regional council consisting of 35 members should be
established for the Tuensang district of the state. The Governor
should make rules for the composition of the council, manner of
choosing its members5 , their qualifications, term, salaries and
allowances; the procedure and conduct of business of the
council; the appointment of officers and staff of the council and
their service conditions; and any other matter relating to the
constitution and proper functioning of the council.
5. For a period of ten years from the formation of Nagaland or for
such further period as the Governor may specify on the
recommendation of the regional council, the following provisions
would be operative for the Tuensang district:
(i) The administration of the Tuensang district shall be carried on
the Governor.
(ii) The Governor shall in his discretion arrange for equita
(iii) Any Act of Nagaland Legislature shall not apply to Tuens
district unless the Governor so directs on the recommendatio
the regional council.
(iv) The Governor can make Regulations for the peace, progress
good government of the Tuensang district. Any such Regula
may repeal or amend an Act of Parliament or any other
applicable to that district.
(v) There shall be a Minister for Tuensang affairs in the S
Council of Ministers. He is to be appointed from amongst
members representing Tuensang district in the Nagal
Legislative Assembly.
(vi) The final decision on all matters relating to Tuensang district s
be made by the Governor in his discretion.
(vii) Members in the Nagaland Legislative Assembly from
Tuensang district are not elected directly by the people but by
PROVISIONS FOR ASSAM AND MANIPUR
Assam
Under Article 371-B6 , the President is empowered to provide for the