instruction
stringlengths 1
84
| input
stringlengths 1
85
| output
stringlengths 1
83
|
---|---|---|
11. Gujarat 1986
|
12. Punjab 1995
|
13. Delhi 1995
|
14. Kerala 1999
|
15. Jharkhand 2001
|
16. Chattisgarh 2002
|
17. Haryana 2002
|
18. Uttarakhand 2002
|
19. Jammu and Kashmir3b 2002
|
20. West Bengal 2003
|
21. Tripura 2008
|
22. Goa 2011
|
The various aspects of the institution of lokayukta are:
|
Structural Variations
|
The structure of the lokayukta is not same in all the states. Some
|
States like Rajasthan, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra
|
have created the lokayukta as well as upalo-kayukta, while some
|
others like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh have created
|
only the lokayukta. There are still other states like Punjab and Orissa
|
that have designated officials as Lokpal. This pattern was not
|
suggested by the ARC in the states.
|
Appointment
|
The lokayukta and upalokayukta are appointed by the governor of
|
the state. While appointing, the governor in most of the states
|
consults (a) the chief justice of the state high court, and (b) the leader
|
of Opposition in the state legislative assembly4 .
|
Qualifications
|
Judicial qualifications are prescribed for the lokayukta in the States of
|
Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Orissa,
|
Karnataka and Assam. But no specific qualifications are prescribed in
|
the states of Bihar, Maharashtra and Rajasthan.
|
Tenure
|
In most of the states, the term of office fixed for lokayukta is of 5
|
Jurisdiction
|
There is no uniformity regarding the jurisdiction of lokayukta in all the
|
states. The following points can be noted in this regard:
|
(a) The chief minister is included within the jurisdiction of lokayukta
|
in the states of Himachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya
|
Pradesh and Gujarat, while he is excluded from the purview of
|
loka-yukta in the states of Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh,
|
Rajasthan, Bihar and Orissa.
|
(b) Ministers and higher civil servants are included in the purview of
|
lokayukta in almost all the states. Maharashtra has also
|
included former ministers and civil servants.
|
(c) Members of state legislatures are included in the purview of
|
lokayukta in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh,
|
Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and Assam.
|
(d) The authorities of the local bodies, corporations, companies and
|
societies are included in the jurisdiction of the lokayukta in most
|
of the states.
|
Investigations
|
In most of the states, the lokayukta can initiate investigations either
|
on the basis of a complaint received from the citizen against unfair
|
administrative action or suo moto. But he does not enjoy the power to
|
start investigations on his own initiative (suo moto) in the States of
|
Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh and Assam.
|
Scope of Cases Covered
|
The lokayukta can consider the cases of ‘grievances’ as well as
|
‘allegations’ in the States of Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Assam,
|
Bihar and Karnataka. But, in Himachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh,
|
Rajasthan and Gujarat, the job of lokayuktas is confined to
|
investigating allegations (corruption) and not grievances
|
(maladministration).
|
Other Features
|
1. The lokayukta presents, annually, to the governor of the state a
|
consolidated report on his performance. The governor places
|
state legislature. The lokayukta is responsible to the state
|
legislature.
|
2. He takes the help of the state investigating agencies for
|
conducting inquiries.
|
3. He can call for relevant files and documents from the state
|
government departments.
|
4. The recommendations made by the loka-yukta are only
|
advisory and not binding on the state government.
|
NOTES AND REFERENCES
|
1. According to the Chambers Dictionary, grievance means ‘a
|
ground of complaint; a condition felt to be oppressive or
|
wrongful’.
|
2. The ARC headed by Morarji Desai submitted a special
|
interim report on the ‘Problems of Redressal of Citizens’
|
Grievances’ in 1966.
|
3. Press Information Bureau, Government of India, December
|
23, 2013.
|
3a. Tixmann’s Guide to Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013, pp.I-
|
9 to I-11.
|
3b. In Jammu and Kashmir, the institution is known as State
|
Accountability Commission (SAC).
|
4. But, in Andhra Pradesh, the leader of the Opposition in the
|
state legislative assembly is not required to be consulted in
|
this regard. In Karnataka, on the other hand, the Chairman
|
of the state legislative council, the Speaker of the state
|
legislative assembly and the leader of Opposition in the
|
state legislative council are also required to be consulted
|
62 National Investigation Agency
|
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NIA
|
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) was constituted in 2009
|
under the provisions of the National Investigation Agency Act,
|
2008 (NIA Act). It is the central counter-terrorism law enforcement
|
agency in the country.
|
The NIA was established in the backdrop of the 2008 Mumbai
|
terror attacks, popularly known as the 26/11 incident. This national
|
horror led to the realisation of the need for a separate federal
|
agency to deal with terror-related crimes in the country.
|
The headquarters of the NIA is at New Delhi. The branch
|
offices of the NIA are located at Hyderabad, Guwahati, Mumbai,
|
Lucknow, Kochi, Kolkata, Jammu and Raipur. In addition, the NIA
|
has a separate specialised cell known as TFFC Cell dealing with
|
the subjects of fake currency notes and terror funding.
|
The NIA is headed by a Director-General. He is appointed by
|
the central government. His powers are similar to the powers
|
exercisable by a Director-General of Police in respect of the police
|
force in a state.
|
The NIA works under the administrative control of the Ministry
|
of Home Affairs, Government of India. The state government
|
RATIONALE OF THE NIA
|
While introducing the NIA Bill in the Parliament, the Government
|
of India gave the following reasons for creating the NIA1 :
|
1. Over the past several years, India has been the victim of
|
large-scale terrorism sponsored from across the borders.
|
There have been innumerable incidents of terrorist attacks,
|
not only in the militancy and insurgency affected areas and
|
areas affected by left-wing extremism, but also in the form of
|
terrorist attacks and bomb blasts, etc., in various parts of the
|
hinterland and major cities, etc.
|
2. A large number of such incidents are found to have complex
|
inter-state and international linkages, and possible
|
connection with other activities like the smuggling of arms
|
and drugs, pushing in and circulation of fake Indian currency,
|
infiltration from across the borders, etc.
|
3. Keeping all these in view, it was felt that there was a need
|
for setting up of an agency at the central level for the
|
investigation of offences related to terrorism and certain
|
other Acts, which have national ramifications.
|
4. Several expert committees and the Second Administrative
|
Reforms Commission2 have also made recommendations
|
for establishing such an agency.
|
5. The Government, after due consideration and examination
|
of the issues involved, proposed to enact a legislation to
|
make provisions for establishment of an NIA in a concurrent
|
jurisdiction framework, with provisions for taking up specific
|
cases under specific Acts for investigation. These provisions
|
FUNCTIONS OF THE NIA
|
The NIA is mandated to investigate and prosecute offences under
|
the various Acts mentioned in the Schedule of the NIA Act. In
|
pursuance of its mandate, the NIA collects, collates and analyses
|
counter-terrorism investigation. It also shares inputs with its sister
|
intelligence agencies and law enforcement units both at central
|
and state governments level.
|
In more detail, the functions assigned to the NIA are as follows3
|
:
|
(a) To investigate and prosecute offences in respect of the Acts
|
specified in the Schedule of the NIA Act.
|
(b) To provide assistance to, and seek assistance from, other
|
intelligence and investigation agencies of the central
|
government and state governments.
|
(c) To take other such measures which may be necessary for
|
VISION OF THE NIA
|
The following points highlight the vision of the NIA:
|
1. The NIA aims to be a thoroughly professional investigative
|
agency matching the best international standards.
|
2. The NIA aims to set the standards of excellence in counter-
|
terrorism and other national security-related investigations at
|
the national level by developing into a highly trained,
|
partnership-oriented workforce.
|
3. The NIA aims at creating deterrence for existing and
|
potential terrorist groups/ individuals.
|
4. The NIA aims to develop as a storehouse of all terrorist-
|
related information.
|
MISSION OF THE NIA
|
The mission of the NIA is as follows:
|
1. In-depth professional investigation of scheduled offences
|
using the latest scientific methods of investigation and
|
setting up such standards as to ensure that all cases
|
entrusted to the NIA are detected.
|
2. Ensuring effective and speedy trial.
|
3. Developing into a thoroughly professional, result-oriented
|
organisation, upholding the Constitution of India and laws of
|
the land, giving prime importance to the protection of human
|
rights and dignity of the individual.
|
4. Developing a professional workforce through regular training
|
and exposure to the best practices and procedures.
|
5. Displaying scientific temper and progressive spirit while
|
discharging the duties assigned.
|
6. Inducting modern methods and latest technology in every
|
sphere of activities of the agency.
|
7. Maintaining professional and cordial relations with the
|
governments of states and union territories and other law
|
enforcement agencies in compliance with the legal
|
provisions of the NIA Act.
|
8. Assisting all states and other investigating agencies in
|
investigation of terrorist cases.
|
9. Building a database on all terrorist-related information and
|
sharing the available database with the states and other
|
agencies.
|
10. Studying and analysing laws relating to terrorism in other
|
countries and regularly evaluating the adequacy of existing
|
laws in India and proposing changes as and when
|
necessary.
|
JURISDICTION OF THE NIA
|
The NIA has concurrent jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute
|
the offences affecting the sovereignty, security and integrity of
|
India, security of state, friendly relations with foreign states and
|
offences under various Acts enacted to implement international
|
treaties, agreements, conventions and resolutions of the UNO, its
|
agencies and other international organisations.
|
The NIA is empowered to probe terror attacks including bomb
|
blasts, hijacking of aircrafts and ships, attacks on nuclear
|
installations and use of weapons of mass destruction.
|
In 2019, the jurisdiction of the NIA was extended4.
|
Consequently, the NIA is also empowered to probe the offences
|
relating to human trafficking, counterfeit currency or bank notes,
|
manufacture or sale of prohibited arms, cyber-terrorism and
|
explosive substances.
|
NIA (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2019
|
The various features or provisions of the amendment are as
|
follows5 :
|
1. It applied the provisions of the NIA Act also to persons who
|
commit a scheduled offence beyond India against Indian
|
citizens or affecting the interest of India.
|
2. It provided that the officers of the NIA shall have the similar
|
powers, duties, privies and liabilities being exercised by the
|
police officers in connection with the investigation of
|
offences, not only in India but also outside India.
|
3. It empowered the central government, with respect to a
|
scheduled offence committed outside India, to direct the NIA
|
to register the case and take up investigation as if such
|
offence has taken place in India.
|
4. It provided that the central government and the state
|
governments may designate Sessions Courts as Special
|
Courts for conducting the trial of offences under the NIA Act.
|
5. It inserted certain new offences in the Schedule of the NIA
|
Act6 .
|
NOTES AND REFERENCES
|
1. Based on the statement of objects and reasons
|
appended to the NIA Bill, 2008.
|
2. The second Administrative Reforms Commission
|
(Chairman: Veerappa Moily), 2005–09, in its report
|
entitled ‘Combating Terrorism’ (2008).
|
3. The National Investigation Agency (Manner of
|
Constitution) Rules, 2008.
|
4. Vide the NIA (Amendment) Act, 2019.
|
5. Based on the Statement of Objects and Reasons
|
appended to the NIA (Amendment) Bill, 2019.
|
63 National Disaster Management
|
Authority
|
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NDMA
|
The Government of India, recognising the importance of disaster
|
management as a national priority, had set up a High Powered
|
Committee in 1999 and a National Committee in 2001 after the
|
Gujarat earthquake, to make recommendations on the preparation
|
of disaster management plans and suggest effective mitigation
|
mechanisms. However, after the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004,
|
the Government of India took a defining step in the legislative
|
history of the country by enacting the Disaster Management Act,
|
20051 .
|
The Act provided for the creation of the National Disaster
|
Management Authority (NDMA) to spearhead and implement a
|
holistic and integrated approach to disaster management in the
|
country. Initially, the NDMA was constituted in 2005 by an
|
Executive Order of the Government of India. Subsequently, the
|
NDMA was notified in 2006 under the provisions of the Act2 .
|
The NDMA consists of a chairperson and other members, not
|
exceeding nine. The Prime Minister is the ex-officio chairperson of
|
the NDMA. The other members are nominated by the chairperson
|
of the NDMA. The chairperson of the NDMA designates one of the
|
members as the vice-chairperson of the NDMA. The vice-
|
chairperson has the status of a Cabinet Minister while the other
|
members have the status of a Minister of State.
|
The NDMA is the apex body for disaster management in the
|
country. It works under the administrative control of the Union
|
Ministry of Home Affairs.
|
The NDMA was established with this vision: ‘To build a safer
|
and disaster resilient India by a holistic, pro-active, technology
|
OBJECTIVES OF THE NDMA
|
The objectives of the NDMA are as follows:
|
1. To promote a culture of prevention, preparedness and
|
resilience at all levels through knowledge, innovation and
|
education.
|
2. To encourage mitigation measures based on technology,
|
traditional wisdom and environmental sustainability.
|
3. To mainstream disaster management into the developmental
|
planning process.
|
4. To establish institutional and techno-legal frameworks to
|
create an enabling regulatory environment and a compliance
|
regime.
|
5. To ensure efficient mechanism for identification, assessment
|
and monitoring of disaster risks.
|
6. To develop contemporary forecasting and early warning
|
systems backed by responsive and failsafe communication
|
with information technology support.
|
7. To ensure efficient response and relief with a caring
|
approach towards the needs of the vulnerable sections of
|
the society.
|
8. To undertake reconstruction as an opportunity to build
|
disaster resilient structures and habitat for ensuring safer
|
living.
|
9. To promote a productive and proactive partnership with the
|
FUNCTIONS OF THE NDMA
|
The NDMA has the responsibility for laying down the policies,
|
plans and guidelines for disaster management for ensuring timely
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.