Datasets:

kilian-group
/

arxiv-classifier

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Subset (4)

default · ~99.6k rows (showing the first 120k)

Split (2)

train · ~72.4k rows (showing the first 93.1k)

paper_id stringlengths 9 16	version stringclasses 26 values	yymm stringclasses 311 values	created timestamp[s]	title stringlengths 6 335	secondary_subfield sequencelengths 1 8	abstract stringlengths 25 3.93k	primary_subfield stringclasses 124 values	field stringclasses 20 values	fulltext stringlengths 0 2.84M
astro-ph/0303607	1	0303	2003-03-27T16:41:33	Near-IR spectra of ISOGAL sources in the Inner Galactic Bulge	[ "astro-ph" ]	In this work we present near-IR spectra (HK-band) of a sample of 107 sources with mid-IR excesses at 7 and 15 $\rm \mu$m detected during the ISOGAL survey. Making use of the DENIS interstellar extinction map from Schultheis et al. (1999) we derive luminosities and find that the $\rm M_{bol}$ vs.~$\rm ^{12}CO$ and $\rm M_{bol} vs. H_{2}O$ diagrams are powerful tools for identifying supergiants, AGB stars, giants and young stellar objects. The majority of our sample are AGB stars (~ 80%) while we find four good supergiant candidates, nine young stellar objects and 12 RGB candidates. We have used the most recent $\rm K_{0}-[15]$ relation by Jeong et al. (2002) based on recent theoretical modeling of dust formation of AGB stars to determine mass-loss rates. However, the uncertainties in the mass-loss rates are rather large. The mass-loss rates of the supergiants are comparable with those in the solar neighbourhood while the long-period Variables cover a mass-loss range from $\rm -5 < log \dot{\it{M}} < -7$. The red giant candidateslie at the lower end of the mass-loss rate range between $\rm -6.5 < log \dot{{\it{M}}} < -9$. We used the equivalent width of the CO bandhead at 2.3 $\rm \mu m$, the NaI doublet and the CaI triplet to estimate metallicities using the relation by Ram\'{\i}rez et al. (\cite{Ramirez2000}). The metallicity distribution of the ISOGAL objects shows a mean [Fe/H] $\sim$ -0.25 dex with a dispersion of $\rm \pm 0.40 dex$ which is in agreement with the values of Ram\'{i}rez et al. (\cite{Ramirez2000}) for Galactic Bulge fields between $\rm b = -4^{o}$ and $\rm b = -1.3^{o}$. A comparison with the solar neighbourhood sample of Lan\c{c}on & Wood (LW) shows that our sample is ~ 0.5 dex more metal-rich on average.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. SOFIaccepted (DOI: will be inserted by hand later) November 7, 2018 3 0 0 2 r a M 7 2 1 v 7 0 6 3 0 3 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Near-IR spectra of ISOGAL sources in the Inner Galactic Bulge ⋆ M. Schultheis1, A. Lan¸con2, A. Omont1, F. Schuller1, and D. K. Ojha3 1 Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France 2 Observatoire de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, 11 rue de l'Universite, 6700 Strasbourg, France 3 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai, 400 005, India Received .... / Accepted .. ......... In this work we present near-IR spectra (HK-band) of a sample of 107 sources with mid-IR excesses Abstract. at 7 and 15 µm detected during the ISOGAL survey. Making use of the DENIS interstellar extinction map from Schultheis et al. (1999) we derive luminosities and find that the Mbol vs. 12CO and Mbol vs. H2O diagrams are powerful tools for identifying supergiants, AGB stars, giants and young stellar objects. The majority of our sample are AGB stars (∼ 80%) while we find four good supergiant candidates, nine young stellar objects and 12 RGB candidates. We have used the most recent K0 − [15] relation by Jeong et al. (2002) based on recent theoretical modeling of dust formation of AGB stars to determine mass-loss rates. The mass-loss rates of the supergiants are comparable with those in the solar neighbourhood while the long-period Variables cover a mass-loss range from −5 < log M < −7. The red giant candidates lie at the lower end of the mass-loss rate range between −6.5 < log M < −9. We used the equivalent width of the CO bandhead at 2.3 µm, the NaI doublet and the CaI triplet to estimate metallicities using the relation by Ram´ırez et al. (2000b). The metallicity distribution of the ISOGAL objects shows a mean [Fe/H] ∼ -0.25 dex with a dispersion of ±0.40 dex which is in agreement with the values of Ram´irez et al. (2000b) for Galactic Bulge fields between b = −4o and b = −1.3o. A comparison with the solar neighbourhood sample of Lan¸con & Wood (2000) shows that our sample is ∼ 0.5 dex more metal-rich on average. Key words. stars: spectroscopy: infrared, extinction-ISM, stars - Galaxy: Bulge, stars: AGB 1. Introduction The inner galactic Bulge sometimes referred to as the central stellar cluster (see e. g. Serabyn & Morris 1996), or as the nuclear Bulge (Mezger et al. 1996), presents quite extreme conditions (see also Philipp et al. 1999, Figer 2002). Extending only ∼ 200-300 pc in the galac- tic plane and ∼ 30-50 pc perpendicular to it, it con- tains a mass ∼ 4x109 M⊙, with mean stellar and inter- stellar densities ∼ 500 times larger than in the galac- tic disk. The galactic Bulge provides a wide metallicity range with −1 < [Fe/H] < 1 which makes it an ideal place for studying stellar evolution. While in the past, sev- eral studies claimed that we deal in the Bulge with a su- persolar metal-rich stellar population (see e. g. Whitford 1978, Frogel & Whitford 1987, Frogel 1988, Rich 1988), chemical abundances there have recently been revised (see e. g. McWilliam & Rich 1994, Frogel et al. 1999) and at present the iron relative abundance is believed to peak at ∼ -- 0.3 dex (Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn 2003, van Loon Send offprint requests to: [email protected] ⋆ Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory, La Silla Chile et al. 2003, Ibata & Gilmore 1995, Minniti et al. 1995, Houdashelt 1996), with a wide dispersion. The metallicity distribution is an important ingredient for the different scenarios of galaxy formation such as dissipational col- lapse or accretion of matter. We want to refer to Freeman & Hawthorn (2003) for the most recent review about the formation and evolution of our Galaxy. In most parts of the galactic Bulge, the study of the stellar population is hampered by its high interstellar ab- sorption (Frogel et al. 1999, Schultheis et al. 1999); studies in the Infrared are therefore crucial. Surveys with the ISO satellite, especially with the ISOCAM instrument (C´esarsky et al. 1996), whose sen- sitivity is several orders of magnitude greater than IRAS and whose angular resolution is ten times better, have led to new possibilities. The ISOGAL 7 and 15µm survey (Omont et al. 2003) in particular has observed ∼ 16 deg2 of the central obscured regions of the Galaxy. The total number of stars detected (∼ 105) is comparable to the number detected by IRAS in the whole Galaxy. The main goals of the ISOGAL survey are to quantify the spatial distributions of the various stellar populations and their properties in the inner Galaxy, together with the proper- 2 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources ties of the warm interstellar medium. The combination of ISOGAL and DENIS (or 2MASS) near-infrared data is a powerful means for determining the nature of sources even in regions of high extinction (AV up to 20 -- 30). The var- ious colour-colour and colour-magnitude diagrams avail- able with the five ISOGAL-DENIS bands provide rich in- formation on extinctions, distances, intrinsic colours and absolute magnitudes. Among the M giants, a large pro- portion of those detected at 15 µm are AGB-LPVs with mass-loss, well traced by their 15 µm excesses (Omont et al. 1999, Glass et al. 1999, Alard et al. 2001). Ojha et al. (2003, hereafter referred to as OOS) studied ISOGAL sources in the outer Bulge (b & 1◦) and discussed their nature as well as their mass-loss rates. AGB stars con- tribute more than 70% towards the replenishment of the ISM in the solar neighbourhood (Sedlmayr 1994). Thus, it is important to study the mass-loss of these objects in different galactic environments. However, detailed characterization of the sources faces various difficulties: very large interstellar extinction, un- certainty in the mid-IR extinction law, photometry un- certainty in the case of the weakest ISOGAL sources, etc.. Spectroscopic follow-up observations have therefore been deemed essential. For example, Schultheis et al. (2002) ob- tained visible spectra of nearby sources with mid-IR ex- cesses and could identify interesting objects such as Ae/Be stars, possibly post-AGB stars and stars with red excess. Optical spectroscopy in the Inner Galactic Bulge fails as the sources become invisible due to the high interstellar extinction (AV > 20 mag). Therefore, only spectroscopy in the near-IR, where interstellar absorption is about ten times smaller (at ∼ 2.2 µm), can reveal us the nature of the source. Up to now the study of stellar populations in the in- ner Galaxy have mostly been restricted to low extinc- tion fields, such as Baade's windows (see e. g. Rich 1988, Terndrup 1988). Recently, however, Ram´ırez et al. (2000b, hereafter referred to as RSFD) studied the M giant popu- lation in the inner Bulge using K-band spectra and deter- mined a number of metallicities (see also Frogel et al. 1999, Ram´ırez et al. 2000a). Wood et al. (1998), Blommaert et al. (1998) and Ortiz et al. (2002) studied OH/IR stars which are known to be the most extreme mass-losing stars around the Galactic Center while Glass et al. (2001) per- formed a monitoring program of large-amplitude variables in the Galactic Centre. In this work, we perform a spectroscopic follow-up study (H and K-bands) of 107 ISOGAL sources with IR excess at 7 and 15 µm in the Inner Galactic Bulge to study their nature, mainly to identify young stellar objects and to establish criteria to distinguish between different classes of objects. We discuss the possibility of separat- ing the different stellar populations such as AGB stars, M giants, supergiants and young stellar objects in highly obscured regions (AV ∼ 20 − 30 mag), combining near-IR spectroscopy, near and mid-IR photometry and interstel- lar extinction data further. We discuss the mass-loss of AGB stars as well as of supergiants and red giant stars. Using the spectral features of CO, NaI and CaI, we esti- mate the metallicity and make a comparison to the solar neighbourhood sample of Lan¸con & Wood (2000, here- after referred to as LW). The derived metallicity distribu- tion will be compared to the dissipative collapse model of Molla et al. (2000). 2. Observations and data reduction 2.1. Near-IR observations The near-IR spectra were obtained between 16-19 July 2000 with the NTT telescope at ESO, La Silla, Chile, using the red grism of the SOFI spectrograph. The spectra were taken under photometric conditions through a 1′′ slit pro- viding a resolving power of R ∼ 1000, and were recorded on a Hawai HgCdTe 1024x1024 array. Before each spec- trum, an image in the K band was taken in order to check the identification of the source. For optimal sky subtraction, "ABBA" observing se- quences were used. The star was moved 10′′ along the slit between the A and B exposures. The exposure time was 30 s in each position, repeated 2-10 times, depending on the brightness of the object. B, A, late F and early G spectrophotometric standard stars were observed during the night (typically 6-8 stars per night) to correct for telluric absorption features. 2.2. Data reduction The data were reduced using MIDAS, the standard ESO reduction package. After removal of cosmic ray events, subtraction of the bias level and the dark, all frames were divided by a normalized flat field. The traces of stars at the two positions along the slit were used to subtract the sky. After extraction and co-adding of the spectra, a wave- length calibration was performed using the Xe-Ne lamp which gives an accuracy better than 2 A. The spectra were rebinned to a linear scale, to obtain a dispersion of ∼ 10 A/pixel and a resulting wavelength range from 1.5 µm to 2.5 µm. We used B, A, F and G standard stars to correct for the instrumental and atmospheric transmissions. For each of the standard stars, a suitable model spectrum from Kurucz (1993) was selected. Significant stellar absorption features were removed by interpolation both in the mod- els and the standard star observations (Brγ in B, A stars; the strongest metal lines in F and G stars). The model spectra were then divided into the standard star spectra to provide the combined instrumental and atmospheric response. The choice of the standard used for the correc- tion of a particular program star depended on proximity in time and airmass. We did not apply a second order correction for airmass, as the residual effects of the tel- luric bands on the features we were interested in are small compared to intrinsic variations. For a more detailed dis- cussion on spectroscopic data reduction in general, we re- fer the reader to LW. The final spectra are normalized 10 01 00 00 30 00 -00 30 -01 00 -04 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 3 20 30 40 -03 -02 -01 00 GALACTIC LONG. 01 02 03 04 . I T A L C T C A L A G Fig. 1. Observed near-IR spectra (indicated by plus signs) superimposed on the extinction map by Schultheis et al. (1999). The greyscale on the top shows the range of AV. Galactic longitude and latitude are given in units of degrees. Note the high interstellar extinction with AV > 20 mag. The comparison fields of RSFD are located at (l = 0, b = −1.3, −1.8, −2.3, −2.8o) and (b = −1.3o, l = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0o) Table 1. Definition of bandpasses for continuum and fea- tures Feature NaI feature NaI continuum #1 NaI continuum #2 CaI feature CaI continumm #1 CaI continuum #2 12CO(2, 0) bandhead 12CO(2, 0) continuum#1 12CO(2, 0) continuum#2 H2O continuum H2O absorption wing 1 H2O absorption wing 2 band passes (µm) 2.204-2.211 2.191-2.197 2.213-2.217 2.258-2.269 2.245-2.256 2.270-2.272 2.289-2.302 2.242-2.258 2.284-2.291 1.629-1.720 1.515-1.525 1.770-1.780 reference RDF RDF RDF RDF RDF RDF LW LW LW at 2.28 µm and are dereddened (see Sect. 3.1) using the extinction values of Schultheis et al. (1999). They are dis- played in Appendix B. Their classification is discussed in Sect. 4. The spectra are available electronically at CDS together with the corresponding finding charts. 2.3. Equivalent widths Prominent spectral features in our data are the NaI, CaI and CO(2,0) bands which have also been discussed by Ram´ırez et al. (1997, hereafter referred to as RDF), and the CO(6,3) and SiI lines (see Origlia et al. 1993 for details). In addition, the OH radical has many groups of prominent lines scattered over the whole H window (Origlia et al. 1993, LW) In our analysis we will use the equivalent widths of the 12CO(2, 0) bands at 2.3 µm (EW(CO)) and the equiv- alent widths of the NaI (EW(Na)) and CaI (EW(Ca)) lines. Additionally, the water absorption (EW(H2O)) at ∼ 1.6 µm has been measured. The adopted index measures the curvature of the spectrum in the H window due to the wings of the water bands centered at 1.4 and 1.9 µm. The index compares the flux in a central passband that is only weakly contaminated by H2O, to the fluxes in passbands on either sides. For consistency with the units of the other feature measurements, its formal expression is that of an equivalent width (but it takes negative values when H2O absorption is present). The measured features are identi- fied in Fig. 2. The exact bandpasses for all measurements are provided in Table 1. 2.4. The ISOGAL catalogue The final product of the ISOGAL catalogues (ISOGAL PSC) at present gives magnitudes, I, J, KS, [7], [15], at five wavelengths (0.8, 1.25, 2.15, 7 & 15 µm) with DENIS providing I,J,KS associations when available. We refer for a detailed description of data reduction and the cross- identification method to Schuller et al. (2003). Note that here and elsewhere we use [λ] to denote the ISOGAL mag- nitude at wavelength λ µm ([7], [15]) 3. Sample Figure 1 shows the location of the ISOGAL sources ob- served with SOFI superimposed on the extinction map of Schultheis et al. (1999). The sources were selected from the ISOGAL fields located at l = −0.27o, b = −0.03o (here- 4 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources hood sample of oxygen-rich stars (M giants, semi-regular Variables and Mira Variables) of LW. 3.1. Interstellar reddening The high interstellar extinction in the Galactic Bulge ham- pers the study of the stellar populations in the inner parts of our Galaxy. As in most parts of the Galactic Bulge, interstellar absorption is not homogeneous but oc- curs in clumps (Glass et al. 1987). Catchpole et al. (1990) mapped the interstellar extinction around the Galactic Centre (∼ 2 deg2) using the red giant branch of 47Tuc as a reference while Frogel et al. (1999) determined the interstellar reddening for a few fields in the inner Galactic Bulge using the red giant branch of Baade's window. Schultheis et al. (1999) constructed a high resolution map of the whole inner part using DENIS data together with isochrones calculated for the RGB and AGB phases. We used their extinction table to deredden our objects (see Table A1) according to the interstellar extinction law of Glass (1999) with AV : AJ : AK = 1 : 0.256 : 0.089. For 7 and 15 µm photometry we used A7/AV = 0.020 and A15/AV = 0.025 (Hennebelle et al. 2001). However, the extinction curve particularly at 7 and 15 µm is rather un- certain. One has also to keep in mind that such extinction values correspond to the peak value of AV on the line of sight; but the actual value for each individual star may differ by several magnitudes. In addition, the extinction values in the very high extincted regions (AV > 25) are only lower limits. Nevertheless there seems to be on aver- age a reasonable agreement with the AV values derived by Wood et al. (1998) for OH/IR stars as discussed by Ortiz et al. (2002). 3.2. Bolometric magnitudes Bolometric magnitudes for our ISOGAL objects were ob- tained by using the multi-band bolometric correction for AGB stars (Loup et al. 2003). It employs multi-band pho- tometry with passbands as accurate as possible, taking into account a mean atmospheric absorption at the site for ground-based observations. The bolometric corrections are derived numerically using 69 models for O-rich stars (see Loup et al. 2003 for a detailed description). The mod- els are based on Groenewegen's radiative transfer code, spanning a large range of dust opacities. The advantage of multi-band bolometric corrections is that the deter- mination of Mbol is more accurate than with traditional one-band bolometric corrections. We used for the input parameter the DENIS J and KS counterparts, the LW2 and LW3 magnitudes of our objects and the AV values of Schultheis et al. (1999). The main errors in the bolo- metric corrections result from the interstellar extinction values giving an error in mbol of at least ∼ 0.2 − 0.3 mag and the intrinsic depth of the "Bulge" on the line of sight (Alard et at al. 2001, OOS). Variability of the stars will introduce additional errors in the determination of Mbol Fig. 2. Spectrum of an AGB star superimposed by the most prominent features of SiI, CO(6-3), NaI, CaI, CO(2- 0) and the H2O band. The shaded area indicates the region of very strong telluric absorption after referred to as field A), l = −0.62o, b = −0.03o (field B), l = −0.90o, b = −0.03o (field C), l = −1.21o, b = −0.03o (field D), l = −0.44o, b = −0.18o (field E), l = −1.12o, b = +0.30o (field F), l = −1.12o, b = −0.33o (field G), l = −5.76o, b = +0.17o (field H). Precise details of the fields can be found in the Explanatory Supplement of the ISOGAL catalog (Schuller et al. 2003). We selected sources with [7] -- [15] > 1.4 and [15] < 8.0 (except for 4 cases, see Fig. 5). These colour criteria were adopted to favour the detection of dusty young objects with mid in- frared excesses close to the galactic centre, but they are also satisfied by a number of evolved stars, as discussed in Sect. 4. We further restricted the sample to sources brighter than ∼ 11 mag in KS in order to avoid spurious associations (Schuller et al. 2003). Such a value is slightly brighter than the KS completeness limit of DENIS in these regions (see also Schultheis & Glass 2001). From the 1130 ISOGAL targets obeying the above criteria in these fields, the 107 sources actually observed with SOFI were selected approximately at random, with the majority of the sources (65) in field A. After the observations, we cross-identified our sample again with the latest version of the ISOGAL Point Source Catalogue (Version 1) described in Schuller et al. (2003) in order to get the final DENIS and ISO photometry. 4 & 5; see Schuller et al. 2003 for details). 5% of our sample now show a more doubtful association between ISOGAL and DENIS (quality flag < 3) and have been dropped. Table A1 lists the coordinates and the corresponding ISOGAL and DENIS magnitudes as well as the measured equivalent widths and the type of each source. As a comparison sample, we used the low resolution (R ∼ 1300) K-band spectra of M giants of RSFD which are located at (l = 0, b = −1.3, −1.8, −2.3, −2.8o) and at (b = −1.3o, l = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0o) and the solar neighbour- M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 5 because of non-simultaneity of the photometry. In Table 2 we list the derived Mbol using a distance modulus of ∆m = 14.5 (or a distance of ∼ 8 kpc). 3.3. Cross-identification with SIMBAD All the objects have been searched for in the SIMBAD data base using a search radius of 3′′. As a result, fifteen objects have been identified as OH/IR stars from the sam- ple of Wood et al. (1998, see also Ortiz et al. 2002), and twelve as Long Period variables from Glass et al. (2001). These subsamples are shown, respectively, in Fig. B3 and Fig. B4. Four objects (A33, A40, D6, D7) are known ra- dio sources with IRAS fluxes characteristic of young stellar objects(see also Sect. 4.3). Fig. 3. Mbol vs. [7]-[15] diagram for the ISOGAL+SOFI sample. Known OH/IR stars (Wood et al. 1998) are indi- cated by filled triangles, LPVs (Glass et al. 2001) by open squares, while the remaining ISOGAL objects of our sam- ple are shown by crosses. The two lines indicate the tip of the RGB and AGB. 4. Classification 4.1. Supergiants As shown in Fig. 4, we find six very luminous objects (A17, B14, B15, B19, E5, E13), besides one OH/IR star, with Mbol . −7.0 (or & 50, 000 L⊙), assuming a distance of 8 kpc to the Galactic Center), which is approximately the AGB tip luminosity (Vassiliadis & Wood 1993). They show very strong CO bands at 2.3 µm with equivalent widths > 20 A (see Sect. 2.3 for the band passes). In ad- dition, four of them (A17,B14,B15,B19) do not show any significant H2O absorption (EW(H2O) < 100 A) which is an indication of supergiants (Bessell et al. 1991, Lan¸con & Rocca-Volmerange 1992). The objects E5 and E13 show very blue colours in K0 −[15] and [7]-[15] and could be late K or early M-type supergiant candidates. Schuller (2003) found from a systematic search of very luminous ISOGAL sources (Mbol < −6) several blue supergiant candidates with K0 − [15] < 1.0. In the [15] vs [7] -- [15] diagram (see Fig. 4a), the su- pergiants (stars) are rather luminous at 15 µm and show rather blue K0 − [15] colours compared to the AGB Variables (see Fig. 4b). 4.2. Long Period variables The majority of our sources we find to be Long-Period Variables (LPVs) of the AGB, mainly based on their very deep water absorption features (LW and Fig. 3a). Strong H2O bands are associated with large period variability and depend on the atmospheric structure of the star (see Bessell et al. 1996). Their luminosities are in the range −4 < Mbol < −7 and their strong CO bands, characteris- tic of stars on the AGB, also imply that they are likely to be Miras and semi-regular variables (SRVs). Fig. 6 shows a comparison between the water bands and the CO bands of the ISOGAL sample and a solar neighbourhood sample of semi-regular variables and Miras (LW). The samples agree surprisingly well within the broad range of the band strength values of both bands. We identify the ISOGAL sources having strong H2O absorption as AGB variables (semi-regular variables or Miras). Greene & Lada (1996) and G´omez & Mardones (2003) showed that YSOs of class III can show rather strong H2O and CO bands too. However, they have rather low luminosities with Mbol > 2 (see G´omez & Mardones 2003), much too faint to be on the AGB (Mbol < −3.5) Therefore, only additional infor- mation about the luminosity give us the real confirmation that our spectra of luminous stars with strong water ab- sorption are indeed AGB star candidates. (see Fig. 4). Figure 3 shows the bolometric magnitudes vs. the [7] -- [15] colour ([7] and [15] denote the magnitude at 7 and 15 µm), which is nearly insensitive to interstellar extinc- tion. Indicated also are the known OH/IR stars and LPVs in our sample (see Sect. 4.2). It is obvious from Fig. 3 that photometric information alone is not sufficient to separate the different categories: additional spectroscopic observa- tions are necessary. In Fig. 4a one can see, except for supergiants and the other very bright sources (Mbol . −6.0), some correlation between the strength of the water bands and the bolo- metric magnitude in the sense that more luminous objects show deeper water absorption. The [15] vs. K0 − [15] dia- gram (Fig. 5) shows that the LPVs have a wide K0 − [15] colour range (0 < K0 − [15] < 7) indicating a large range of mass-loss rates (see discussion below). 6 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources Fig. 4. Equivalent width of H2O vs. Mbol (a) and K0 vs equivalent width of CO (b). YSOs are indicated by filled circles, OH/IR stars (Wood et al. 1998) by filled triangles, LPVs (Glass et al. 2001) by open squares, candidates of red giants by open circles, supergiant candidates by stars and AGB Variables by crosses. The dotted line indicated the tip of the RGB. The two AGB stars with Mbol ≤ −7 are probably blue supergiant candidates (see text). Twelve LPVs from our sample and five OH/IR stars (see Table A1) were observed by Glass et al. (2001) and we have therefore additional information about their pe- riods and their K amplitudes. The period range is rather narrow, starting from ∼ 400d up to 800d. The sources within the sample follow a period-luminosity relation but we do not find any relation between the CO or water band strengths and the amplitude. 4.3. Young stellar objects A33, A40, D6 and D7 are already known to be young stellar objects. They have been detected by IRAS with very red colours and also show radio emission. They have more-or-less featureless spectra (see Fig. B.1) with no CO absorption at 2.3 µm but in some cases possess hydrogen absorption lines (Brackett series). The objects B23, B27, B35, B37, C19 are newly found young stellar objects show- ing the same spectral features as the four known ones. Greene & Lada (1996) presented the first system- atic spectroscopic survey of YSOs, comprising a sample from the Ophiucus molecular cloud. They found that the strengths of atomic and CO absorption features are closely related to the evolutionary state. The line strengths de- crease from the Class III phase through Class II to the self-embedded Class I, where the absorption features are absent. All nine YSOs of our sample show more-or-less featureless spectra with no CO absorption lines and no Brγ emission. Thus, we associate them with young stellar objects of Class I. However, Fig. 5 shows that YSOs cannot be sepa- rated unambiguously from other stellar populations by using ISOGAL colours alone. Felli et al. (2000) give a cri- terion for selecting YSO candidates (see Fig. 4) in the ISOGAL [15] vs. [7] -- [15] diagram and Felli et al. (2002) present a catalog of YSO candidates with [15] < 4.5 and [7] − [15] > 1.8. The criteria defined by Felli et al. (2002) are satisfied by seven of the nine identified YSOs in this region (see Fig. 4a). However, as shown in Fig. 5, there are also 32 AGB variables, eight OH/IR stars and four supergiants in the same region. Felli et al. (2002) point out also that [7] − [15] ≥ 2.5 is a more conservative cri- terion for identifying YSOs. Six of the YSOs meet this criterion but it is still satisfied by seven objects which are probably AGB stars. Thus, an unambiguous separa- tion between YSOs and evolved stars can only be made by using additional spectroscopic information. 4.4. M giants In contrast to the typical LPV, M giants show nearly no water vapor bands. Using an additional luminosity crite- rion, namely Mbol fainter than -- 3.5 (see Fig. 3), which is approximately the tip of the RGB (see Tiede et al. 1996, Omont et al. 1999), we find 12 objects. Figure 5 shows that indeed the M giant candidates populate the lower end in both the [15] vs [7] -- [15] and [15] vs. K0 − [15] dia- gram. However, as seen in Fig. 6, the separation between M giants and variable AGB stars in the CO vs. H2O plane is ambiguous. Some of the stars classified as giants might M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 7 Fig. 5. [15] vs. [7] -- [15] diagram (left panel) and [15] vs K0 − [15] diagram (right panel). Symbols are the same as in Fig. 4. The dotted line shows the region searched by Felli et al. (2000) for YSO candidates (see text). The long-dashed line indicates a more conservative criterion for identifying YSOs (Felli et al. 2002 ) be AGB stars that happen to be caught at a phase of pul- sation where H2O is not very strong (see LW). Additional multi-epoch observations are necessary, especially because it has recently been shown that most M giants with late spectral types are variable (Alcock et al. 2000, Glass & Schultheis 2002). 5. Discussion Figure 5 shows that near and mid-IR photometry alone are not sufficient for distinguishing the different stellar populations; additional near-IR spectroscopy is necessary. Using the Mbol vs H2O and the 12CO vs. K0 diagram (see Fig. 4) we can identify supergiants, AGB Variables, red giants and young stellar objects. In addition, mid-IR data at 7 and 15 µm enables us to estimate mass-loss rates of the stellar population while the equivalent widths of the CO bandhead, the NaI doublet and the CaI triplet give us estimates of the metallicity. 5.1. Mass loss One of the most promising tools for determining mass- loss rates is the combination of near-IR and mid-IR colour such as the IRAS K0 -- [12] or the ISOGAL K0 -- [15] colours (see e. g. Whitelock et al. 1994, Habing 1996, Le Bertre & Winters 1998, Omont et al. 1999, Jeong et al. 2002, OOS etc.). We will use the most recent colour-mass loss relation for oxygen-rich AGB stars by Jeong et al. (2002) which is based on a consistent time dependent treatment of hydrodynamics, thermodynamics, equilibrium chem- Fig. 6. Equivalent width of H2O vs. CO, using the sam- ple of oxygen-rich LPVs of LW for comparison. YSOs are indicated by filled circles, OH/IR stars by filled triangles, LPVs by open squares, candidates of giants by open cir- cles, supergiant candidates by stars and AGB variables by crosses. Filled squares indicate the comparison sample of semi-regular variables and Miras of LW. 8 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources From this relation, the OH/IR stars in our sample cover mass-loss rates ranging from −6.0 < log M < −4.5 while LPVs range between −6.5 < log M < −5. Considering the uncertainties (see above) these values lie within the ranges determined by Ortiz et al. (2002) for OH/IR stars and Alard et al. (2001) for LPVs. Our red giant candidates show mass-loss rates in the range be- tween −8 < log M < −6. Origlia & Ferraro (2002) de- termined mass-loss rates of red giants in globular clusters using ISOCAM observations. They find mass-loss rates in the range of −7 < log M < −6 assuming a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 200 and using the DUSTY code. Their mass- loss range is much narrower than we find. However, taking the color-mass loss relation of Jeong et al. (2002) would result in at least 10 times smaller mass-loss rates for the sample of Origlia & Ferraro (2002). It is obvious that red giants certainly contribute significantly to the integrated mass-loss (see also OOS). We want to stress that this is the first attempt to quantify mass-loss rates of red giants in the central part of our Galaxy. A systematic study of these objects in the inner Bulge is certainly needed to de- rive accurate number densities and their contribution to the integrated mass-loss. Our 4 supergiant candidates show mass-loss rates be- tween −6 < log M < −5.5 assuming that the relation by Jeong et al. (2002) is valid for supergiants. However, as pointed out by Josselin et al. (2000) the gas-to-dust ratio for these kind of objects is rather uncertain. Therefore a detailed comparison with the solar neighbourhood sample of Josselin et al. (2000) is at this stage rather difficult. 5.2. Spectral determination of luminosity class Do spectra in the H and K bands offer the possibility of determining the luminosity class? Ram´ırez et al. (1997) used the quantity log [EW(CO)/(EW(Na) + EW(Ca))] to distinguish between giants and dwarfs over the effective temperature range between 3400 and 4600 K (see their Fig. 11). They argued that this quantity might be a pow- erful luminosity diagnostic. Figure 8 shows that the M giants of RSFD (indicated by the two straight lines) and our sample agree quite well. For comparison, we calculated also the values for the LW sample. We find that there is no clear separation between supergiants and M giants or LPVs. However, as seen in Fig. 8, the dispersion in log [EW(CO)/(EW(Na) + EW(Ca))] is much narrower for M giants than for variable AGB stars. Pulsation is respon- sible for the extended atmospheres of LPVs (Feuchtinger et al. 1993) which is seen in the large dispersion of log [EW(CO)/(EW(Na) + EW(Ca))] of the LPVs and OH/IR stars. We get similar results using the LW sample. While the quantity log [EW(CO)/(EW(Na) + EW(Ca))] is a good discriminator between dwarfs and giants, it can not be adopted to separate LPVs from supergiants and red giants. Fig. 7. Mass-loss rate vs. 15 µm magnitude vs. for the present sample. OH/IR stars are indicated by filled trian- gles, LPVs by open squares, red giant candidates by open circles and supergiants by stars. istry and dust formation. They give an explicit relation between M and the (K − [15])0 colour. log M = −6.83/(K − [15])0 − 3.78 [M⊙/yr] (1) One has to be aware that using this relation between M and K0 − [15] for our sample includes uncertainties in the determination of the mass-loss rate arising from the following causes: (1) Our de-reddend (K − [15])0 colours are strongly affected by the uncertainty in the determi- nation of interstellar extinction, in particularly in these highly extincted regions (see Schultheis et al. 1999). This could lead easily to errors in M of a factor of 2 -- 3; (2) The relation was derived for oxygen-rich AGB stars in the solar neighbourhood. Habing et al. (1994) argued that metal- licity affects the dust to gas ratio and the outflow velocity from evolved stars which is directly related to the mass- loss and that, therefore, the color- M relation might dif- fer in different galactic environments such as between the Galactic Bulge and the Magellanic Clouds; (3) It is im- portant to emphasize that the KS magnitudes of DENIS are single epoch measurements. The average K amplitude of our sources associated with known LPVs (Glass et al. 2001) is ∼ 1.0 mag, which gives a factor of ∼ 2 -- 5 uncer- M for −7 < log M < −5. tainty in the determination of We want to emphasize that the colour mass-loss relation by Jeong et al. (2002) is calculated for variable AGB stars. Its adaption to non-variable red giants and supergiants has to be questioned. M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 9 Fig. 8. The luminosity indicator of Ram´ırez et al. (1997) vs. CO band strengths. The two straight lines show the location of the M giants of Ram´ırez et al. (1997). The symbols are the same as in Fig. 3 5.3. Metallicity Recently, RSFD and Frogel et al. (2001) have obtained a new metallicity scale for luminous red giants based on equivalent width measurements of the CO bandhead, the NaI doublet and the CaI triplet (see Table 1). Their cali- bration is based on giants in globular clusters for −1.8 < [Fe/H] < −0.1 . We have used the following relation (so- lution 1, RSFD) [Fe/H]index RSFD = -1.782 + 0.352 EW(Na) - 0.0231 EW(Na)2 -0.0267 EW(Ca) + 0.0129 EW(Ca)2 + 0.0472 EW(CO) - 0.00109 EW(CO)2 (2) where EW(Na), EW(Ca) and EW(CO) are the equiv- alent widths of NaI, CaI and 12CO(2, 0) (see Table 1). As described in RA97, the typical errors in the determination of [Fe/H] are of the order of ∼ 0.1 dex. RSFD provide a second expression for [Fe/H]index RSFD, that reduces the scat- ter in their data with correction terms based on (J − K)0. As most of our program stars do not have measurable J magnitudes due to heavy extinction, this second relation could not be used. In addition, we determined this index from Eq. (2) for the sample of oxygen-rich stars (M giants, semi-regular variables and Miras) in the solar neighbourhood of LW using the same bandpasses. We used repeated observations of LW for semi-regular and Mira variables, such as BD Hya, R Cha or KV Car. For the same star the metallicity index of RSFD can vary by ∼ 0.5 dex showing that it does Fig. 9. Distribution of metallicity. The solid lines is our ISOGAL sample located in the inner Bulge; the dotted line is the solar neighbourhood sample of oxygen-rich AGB stars and M giants by LW. not actually measure metallicity in individual spectra of strongly variable stars. Fig. 9 shows the distribution of the RSFD metallic- ity index of our ISOGAL objects superimposed on the solar neighbourhood sample of LW. If we use only the non-varying static stars of LW and our sample of red gi- ant candidates, the mean [Fe/H]index RSFD does not change, al- though the dispersion gets smaller. This shows that, even if the metallicity index of RSFD is not strictly valid for single observations of a variable star, it can be used on av- erage over a whole pulsation cycle. This is important for stellar population studies, as our results show that very time consuming multi-epoch observations of LPVs are not necessary in order to obtain average metallicities. We will only use average values in the remaining discussion. The mean [Fe/H]index RSFD is −0.25 dex, with a disper- sion of ±0.40 dex, which is in agreement with the val- ues obtained for the static sample of RSFD. Their mean [Fe/H]index RSFD is −0.21 dex with a dispersion of ±0.30 dex. This suggests that the ISOGAL sample and the sample of RSFD have similar metallicities despite their spatial separation. Superimposed is the solar neighbourhood sample of RSFD of ∼ −0.6 dex (see Fig. 9). LW with an average [Fe/H]index 10 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources It is known that there is a large spread in the solar neighbourhood metallicity distribution (see e. g. Haywood 2001) with −0.3 < [Fe/H]index RSFD < 0; an offset of ∼ 0.3 dex with respect to the solar neighbourhood sample of LW is apparent. The relation of RSFD is based on the calibra- tion of globular clusters and thus is biased towards metal- poor stars. At higher metallicities the CO band reaches a plateau and becomes insensitive to changes in [Fe/H]index RSFD. Since solution 1 has a strong dependence on EW(CO), it will therefore underestimate [Fe/H]index RSFD for larger metal- licities. However, Fig. 9 shows that our ISOGAL sample as well as the sample of RSFD is ∼ 0.4 dex metal richer than the solar neighbourhood sample of LW. Haywood (2001) gives a modelled and an observed age-metallicity relation (see their Fig. 14a). According to that, a [Fe/H] of −0.6 dex corresponds to ages of about 8 -- 9 Gyr and thus for AGB stars an initial mass of the order of one solar mass. So, according to the age-metallicity relation, the solar neighbourhood sample of LW have initial masses around 1 M⊙, in agreement with mass estimates derived from pulsation periods (see Table 8 of LW). The differ- ence in the metallicity distribution in the solar neighbour- hood and in the Bulge results probably from both different mean stellar ages and different mean age-metallicity rela- tions due to different star formation histories and chemi- cal evolution histories. However, the validity of such age- metallicity relations is still on debate (see e.g. the recent review of Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn 2003) The accurate determination of mean stellar metallici- ties is essential for constraining models of star formation and chemical evolution in the Bulge. Our mean [Fe/H] value is consistent with previous chemical abundance stud- ies of the galactic Bulge (see e. g. McWilliam & Rich 1994, Minniti et al. 1995, Houdashelt 1996, Frogel et al. 1999, RSFD) where the metallicity peaks ∼ −0.3 dex. Moreover, Molla et al. (2000) model the evolution of the Galactic Bulge which assumes a dissipative collapse of the gas from a protogalaxy or halo to form the Bulge and the disk. They predict a mean stellar Bulge metallicity [Fe/H] ∼ −0.2 dex with a dispersion of ±0.40 dex. A chemical abundance gradient in the Bulge is one characteristics of a Bulge formed by a dissipative col- lapse. The determination of the metallicity gradient in the central regions of our Galaxy is important for test- ing models of Galaxy formation. Up to now, only a few studies of the metallicity gradient exist in the inner Bulge (b < 30). Frogel et al. (1999) found a metallicity gradi- ent based on near-IR photometric data while RSFD could not find any evidence. The dissipative collapse model of Molla et al. (2000) predict a steep metallicity gradient (−0.8 dex kpc−1) in the inner Bulge (R < 500 pc) which is not supported by the data of RSFD. Our sample of near- IR spectra presented here, which agrees with the metal- licity distribution of RSFD, seems to confirm the absence of a metallicity gradient in the Bulge. We want to stress that our data set is not sufficient to do a large statistical analysis of chemical abundances in the galactic Bulge. Therefore a more detailed discussion of the implications of the results is beyond the scope of this paper; a large observational program is necessary. It is obvious from the discussion above that only realis- tic models of M giants including the effects of metallicity can enable us to make a quantitative determination of their metallicity. First tests of synthetic spectra based on hydrostatic MARCS model atmospheres (in collaboration with B. Aringer) and including a complete atomic line list already show some promising results (Aringer et al. 2002). However, for AGB stars (the majority of our stars) hydro- dynamical models would be more appropriate (see e. g. Hofner 1999, Aringer et al. 2000). 6. Conclusions We have studied a sample of 107 near-IR spectra of ISOGAL sources with excesses at 7 and 15 µm in the in- nermost parts of the galactic Bulge where the interstellar extinction is high and clumpy. We have shown that us- ing the molecular bands of CO and H2O, together with the bolometric magnitudes and the interstellar extinction values, one can reasonably well separate AGB stars, red giants, supergiants and young stellar objects. We have found four supergiant candidates, twelve red giant can- didates and nine YSOs, while the rest are probably vari- able AGB stars. We have used the most recent K0 − [15] M relation by Jeong et al. (2002) which is based on vs. a self-consistent time dependent model of dust formation in AGB stars to determine mass-loss rates. We empha- size that the color- M relation has been determined from a model of AGB/LPVs and gives only an indication of the mass-loss rate. From our sample, OH/IR stars cover mass-loss rates ranging from −6 < log M < −4.5 while LPVs range between −6.5 < log M < −5. Our red gi- ant candidates show mass-loss rates in the range between −8 < log M < −6. However, this selection is biased in fa- vor of large M . A comparison with mass-loss rates of red giants in globular clusters (Origlia & Ferrero 2002) shows that our mass-loss range is much broader towards larger M . However, the uncertainty in the determina- values of tion of M is rather large. While the quantity log [EW(CO)/(EW(Na) + EW(Ca))] of RDF is a good discriminator between giants and dwarfs, it cannot be used to separate supergiants and LPVs from red giants. However, the dispersion is much narrower for M giants than for variable AGB stars. We have used the metallicity index [Fe/H]index RSFD of RSFD, determined from the line strengths of CO, NaI and CaI, to estimate the metallicity of the stellar popula- tion. Our mean [Fe/H]index RSFD is −0.25 dex with a dispersion of ±0.40 dex which is in agreement with the values ob- tained by RSFD and supports the argument of RSFD that there is no metallicity gradient in the Bulge. Our mean [Fe/H]index RSFD is consistent with previous abundance studies of the galactic Bulge and with the multiphase evolution models of Molla et al. (2000) which assume a dissipative collapse of a protogalaxy to form the Bulge and the galac- tic disk. Our results confirm that even if the metallicity M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 11 index of RSFD is only valid for M giants, it can be used to estimate an average metallicity valid over a whole pul- sation cycle. This is an important result for future stellar population studies using multi-fiber spectrographs (such as NIRMOS, GIRAFFE,etc.). However, there is a press- ing need for a grid of realistic models of M giants with different [Fe/H] to facilitate a quantitative determination of metallicities, as well as further modeling of LPV/AGB stars. Acknowledgements: We want to thank I. S. Glass, J. Blommaert, J. van Loon for their fruitful comments and discussions. MS is supported by the Fonds zur Forderung der wis- senschaftlichen Forschung (FWF), Austria, under the project number J1971-PHY. This research is supported by the project 1910-1 of Indo-French Center for the Promotion of Advanced Research (CEFIPRA). is supported, The DENIS project in France by the Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers, the Education Ministry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, in Germany by the State of Baden- Wurtemberg, in Spain by the DGICYT, in Italy by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, in Austria by the Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung und Bundesministerium fur Wissenschaft und Forschung. This research has made use of the Simbad database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. References Alard, C., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Cesarsky, C., 2001, ApJ 552, 289 Alcock, C., Allsman, R. A., Alves, D. R., et al., 2000, AJ 119, 2194 Aringer, B., Kerschbaum, F., Hron, J., 2000, in " The 2nd ISO workshop on analytical spectroscopy", eds. A. Salama, M. F. Kessler, K. Lech & B. Schulz, ESA-SP 456 Aringer B., Jørgensen U. G., Schultheis M., et al., 2002, in "Determining Stellar parameters for red giants", IAU symp. 210, Uppsala, Sweden Bessell, M. S., Brett, J. M., Scholz, M., Wood, P. R., 1991, A&ASS 89, 335 Bessell, M. S., Scholz, M., Wood, P. R., 1996, A&A 307, 481 Blommaert, J. A. D. L., van der Veen, W. E. C. J., van Langevelde, et al., 1998, A&A 329, 991 Catchpole, R. M., Whitelock, P. A., Glass, I. S., 1990, MNRAS 247, 479 Cesarsky, C., Abergel, A., Agnese, P. et al. 1996 A&A, 315L, 32 Felli, M., Comoretto, G., Testi, L., et al., 2000, A&A 362, 199 Felli, M., Testi, L., Schuller, F.,et al., 2002, A&A 392, 971 Feuchtinger, M. U., Dorfi, E. A., Hofner, S., 1993, A&A 273, 513 Figer D. F., 2002, in "A Massive Star Odysee, from Main Sequence to Supernova", IAU symp. 212, eds. K. A. van der Hucht % C. Esteban (astro-ph/0207300) Frogel J.A., Whitford A. E., 1987, ApJ 320, 199 Frogel J. A., 1988, ARA&A 26, 51 Frogel, J. A., Tiede, G. P., Kuchinski, L. E., 1999, AJ, 117, 2296 Frogel, J. A., Stephens, A., Ram´ırez, S. V., et al., 2001, AJ 122, 1896 Glass, I. S., Catchpole, R. M., Whitelock, P. A., 1987, MNRAS 227, 373 Glass, I. S., 1999, Handbook of infrared astronomy, Cambridge University Press Glass, I.S., Ganesh, S., Alard, C. et al., 1999, MNRAS 308, 127 Glass I. S., Matsumoto S., Carter B. S., Sekiguchi K., 2001, MNRAS 321, 77 Glass, I. S., Schultheis, M., 2002, MNRAS 337, 519 G´omez M., D. Mardones, submitted 2003, to AJ, (astro-ph/0301081) Greene, T. P., Lada, C. J., 1996, AJ 112, 2184 Habing, H. J., Tignon, J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., 1994, A&A 286, 523 Habing, H.J., 1996, A&AR 7, 97 Haywood, M., 2001, MNRAS 325, 1365 Hennebelle, P., P´erault, M., Teyssier, D., et al., 2001, A&A 365, 598 Hofner, S., 1999, A&A 346, L9 Houdashelt, M., 1996, PASP 108, 828 Ibata R. A., Gilmore G. F., 1995, MNRAS 275, 591 Jeong K. S., Winters J. M., Le Bertre T., et al., 2002, in "Mass- losing Pulsating stars and their Circumstellar Matter", eds. Y. Nakasa, M. Honma and M. Sekiin Josselin, E., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Li F. L., 2000, A&A 357, 225 Kurucz, 1993, CDrom Number 13 (provided by the author) Lan¸con, A., Rocca-Volmerange, B., 1992, A&AS 96, 593 Lan¸con, A., Wood, P.R., 2000, A&AS, 146, 217 (LW) Le Bertre, T., Winters, J. M., 1998, A&A 334, 173 Loup, C., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Cioni M. R., et al., 2003, submitted to A&A Mathis J. S., 1990, ARA&A 28, 37 Mezger P. G., Dusch W. J., Zylka R., 1996, A&AR 7, 289 McWilliam, A., Rich, R. M., 1994, ApJS 91, 749 Minniti, D., Olszewski, E. W., Liebert, J., et al., 1995, MNRAS 277, 1293 Molla, M., Ferrini, F., Gozzi, G., 2000, MNRAS 316, 345 Ojha, D. K., Omont, A., Schuller, F., et al., 2003, A&A, sub- mitted to A&A (OOS) Omont, A., Ganesh, S., Alard, C. et al., 1999, A&A 348, 755 Omont, A., Gilmore, G., Alard, C., et al., 2003, A&A, in press Origlia, L., Moorwood, A. F. M., Oliva, E., 1993, A&A 280, 536 Origlia L., Ferraro F. R., 2002, ApJ 571, 458 Ortiz, R., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Copet, E., et al., 2002, A&A 388, 279 Philipp S., Zylka R., Mezger P. G., Duschl W. J., Herbst T., Tuffs R. J., 1999, A&A 348, 768 Ram´ırez, S. V., DePoy, D. L., Frogel, J. A. et al., 1997, AJ 113, 1411 (RDF) Ram´ırez, S. V., Sellgren, K., Carr, J. S., et al., 2000a, ApJ 537, 205 Ram´ırez, S. V., Stephens, A. W., Frogel, J. A., et al., 2000b, AJ 120, 833 (RSFD) Fluks, M. A., Plez, B., Th´e, P. S., et al.. 1994, A&AS 141, 313 Freeman K., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2003, submitted to ARA&A, Rich, R. M., 1988, AJ 95, 828 Schuller, F., Ganesh, S., Messineo, M., et al., 2003, A&A in (astro-ph/0208106) press 12 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources Schuller, F., PhD thesis Schultheis, M., Ganesh, S., Simon, et al., et al., 1999, A&A 349, L69 Schultheis, M., Glass, I. S., 2001, MNRAS 327, 1193 Schultheis, M., Parthasarathy, M., Omont, A., et al., 2002, A&A 386, 899 Sedlmayr, E., 1994, in "Molecules in the Stellar Environment", U G. Jorgensen (ed.), Springer, Berlin, p.163 Serabyn, E., Morris, M., 1996, Nature 382, 602 Terndrup, D. M., 1988, AJ 96, 884 Tiede, G. P., Frogel, J. A., Terndrup, D. M., 1996, AJ 110, 2788 van Loon, J. Th., Gilmore, G. F., Omont, A., et al., 2003, MNRAS 338, 857 Vassiliadis, E., Wood, P. R., 1993, ApJ 413, 641 Whitelock, P. A., Menzies, J. W., Feast M. W., et al., 1994, MNRAS 267, 711 Whitford A. E., 1978, ApJ 226, 777 Wood, P. R., Habing, H. J., McGregor, P. J., 1998, A&A 336, 925 Appendix A: Tables Appendix B: Near-IR spectra The spectra were dereddened using the extinction curve by Mathis et al. (1990) and the DENIS extinction map (Schultheis et al. 1999), see Section 3.1. The flux densi- ties per unit wavelength are normalized at 2.28 µm. The spectra are electronically available at CDS. Strong telluric bands are seen between 1.8 and 1.9 µm. Table A1: Coordinates (J2000), magnitudes (DENIS,ISOGAL),AV values, equivalent widths (in A) of 12CO(2, 0),NaI,CaI,H2O,Mbol,log M name right ascension A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A12 A13 A14 A16 A17 A18 A19 A20 A21 A22 A23 A24 A25 A26 A27 A28 A29 A30 A31 A33 A34 A35 A36 A38 A39 A40 A41 A43 A45 A47 A49 A50 A51 A52 17 44 23.8 17 44 30.4 17 44 31.7 17 44 31.8 17 44 34.4 17 44 35.7 17 44 36.4 17 44 39.7 17 44 44.5 17 44 44.6 17 44 48.0 17 44 48.6 17 44 49.1 17 44 49.5 17 44 50.3 17 44 52.7 17 44 52.9 17 44 53.1 17 44 54.2 17 44 54.7 17 44 55.5 17 44 56.8 17 44 57.0 17 44 57.1 17 44 57.8 17 44 57.9 17 44 58.9 17 44 59.5 17 44 59.6 17 45 1.0 17 45 1.7 17 45 4.8 17 45 4.8 17 45 4.9 17 45 5.3 17 45 7.0 17 45 9.8 17 45 10.8 17 45 12.2 17 45 13.5 17 45 14.0 17 45 14.3 declination -29 8 55.3 -29 7 15.5 -29 6 20.6 -29 17 10.5 -29 10 38.5 -29 13 5.4 -29 9 25.2 -29 16 45.9 -29 5 38.3 -29 7 33.6 -29 6 49.8 -29 0 13.2 -29 19 54.2 -29 3 15.9 -29 19 21.5 -29 14 11.1 -29 7 6.7 -28 59 46.5 -29 13 44.9 -29 3 59.0 -29 1 43.4 -29 10 20.3 -29 5 57.3 -29 15 24.7 -29 20 42.5 -29 4 6.5 -29 9 10.8 -29 16 4.6 -29 11 15.4 -29 1 14.9 -29 2 50.0 -29 1 24.9 -29 5 48.5 -29 11 46.8 -29 1 35.8 -29 3 34.2 -29 5 17.8 -29 7 12.2 -29 4 25.2 -29 5 26.7 -29 15 27.4 -29 7 20.8 J 14.57 15.14 13.80 -- 13.41 15.20 -- -- -- 15.84 15.24 15.62 11.08 15.08 14.58 -- -- -- 14.84 -- 14.34 15.77 15.25 -- -- 14.64 -- -- 13.43 -- 13.83 13.94 13.69 15.24 13.89 13.94 -- 15.59 -- 13.17 15.93 -- KS 10.03 9.23 8.50 9.58 8.04 8.68 9.67 10.99 11.18 9.26 9.34 9.89 6.17 9.42 9.01 9.61 9.30 10.78 8.58 10.70 8.53 9.05 10.11 8.84 10.65 9.15 8.19 10.78 7.95 9.43 8.23 8.52 7.85 9.01 8.46 8.56 10.87 9.61 8.72 7.62 10.31 10.60 [7] 8.74 4.77 5.08 5.58 4.05 4.83 4.20 4.50 3.57 5.90 5.03 8.16 3.41 6.92 6.92 7.62 5.38 8.76 4.89 5.13 5.48 6.11 4.48 5.30 4.66 7.14 4.73 4.08 5.50 5.90 4.91 5.52 4.86 4.27 5.47 4.86 7.82 7.69 4.85 4.56 3.47 4.14 [15] 6.43 3.93 2.92 4.04 1.76 3.15 2.62 2.35 2.05 4.35 2.85 99.99 1.31 5.21 5.34 5.13 3.73 6.82 3.23 3.29 3.91 4.41 1.65 3.51 2.45 5.46 2.99 0.50 3.75 4.27 3.26 3.86 3.31 1.97 3.75 2.73 6.26 4.82 3.28 2.98 1.59 2.40 AV 19.60 19.10 19.70 24.50 21.60 25.10 22.30 25.00 20.50 19.40 20.50 21.50 25.40 21.60 24.80 24.50 28.50 19.80 24.50 22.10 19.80 25.30 25.30 20.30 23.40 22.30 24.40 20.30 23.80 19.80 18.50 23.10 23.10 23.50 20.60 24.80 22.80 22.80 22.30 23.90 24.00 22.90 12CO(2, 0) 19.48 9.83 21.04 16.88 21.93 13.75 20.74 19.09 12.99 8.38 20.94 21.04 20.58 29.17 19.80 20.76 18.84 18.94 22.34 7.52 20.48 19.99 19.20 17.13 8.98 23.18 17.21 -2.28 22.46 12.08 20.32 7.78 22.72 -1.61 17.11 18.78 17.07 18.75 21.14 16.59 15.75 8.78 NaI 4.93 2.44 2.26 3.94 4.10 2.17 4.88 5.25 1.29 2.30 4.57 6.26 0.78 6.16 5.21 5.47 4.21 5.42 3.70 0.19 3.54 3.76 4.29 1.49 -0.05 5.60 1.34 0.42 3.96 1.27 2.64 0.65 3.34 0.58 2.32 -0.14 3.82 4.46 3.20 1.52 3.32 1.01 CaI 1.87 -0.50 -0.74 0.23 -0.11 -0.51 2.41 3.61 -2.11 -1.37 1.94 1.35 -0.24 1.31 1.41 3.40 1.63 2.91 -- -0.95 -0.76 -1.08 3.11 -1.44 -1.75 2.32 -0.77 -1.24 -1.06 -- -0.16 0.69 0.20 -0.18 0.85 0.36 1.12 2.02 -0.38 -0.06 2.54 0.12 H2O -35.78 -261.11 -666.39 -157.16 -386.72 -259.69 -23.84 -13.92 -181.29 -434.36 -120.23 -54.97 -52.70 -336.94 -184.69 -27.37 -144.06 -19.26 -543.70 -277.07 -623.25 -526.70 -8.01 -473.84 129.52 -112.56 -332.12 Mbol -3.25 -4.32 -4.83 -4.52 -5.71 -5.04 -5.08 -4.45 -6.03 -3.74 -4.36 -3.14 -8.06 -3.76 -4.65 -4.01 -4.98 -2.48 -5.08 -3.80 -4.52 -4.36 -5.07 -4.67 -4.32 -4.13 -5.63 1.78 2504.72 -505.14 -430.36 -694.69 -498.84 -347.86 77.81 -536.87 -993.36 -86.09 -52.85 -643.49 -629.52 -54.14 -318.86 -5.64 -4.18 -4.83 -5.06 -5.56 -5.14 -4.77 -5.46 -2.82 -3.61 -5.19 -6.03 2504.72 -4.94 log M -6.69 -5.46 -5.36 -5.50 -5.17 -5.52 -4.99 -4.75 -4.65 -5.64 -5.10 -- -5.89 -6.20 -7.06 -6.13 -5.60 -6.32 -5.59 -4.92 -5.82 -6.04 -4.78 -5.47 -4.80 -6.80 -5.66 -- -6.33 -5.53 -5.58 -5.93 -6.01 -- -5.79 -5.39 -5.95 -5.83 -5.48 -5.98 -4.73 -4.79 type RGB AGB AGB AGB OH/IR AGB AGB OH/IR OH/IR AGB OH/IR RGB supergiant LPV AGB AGB AGB RGB OH/IR AGB AGB LPV AGB AGB OH/IR AGB LPV YSO LPV LPV OH/IR OH/IR LPV YSO LPV OH/IR RGB AGB LPV LPV OH/IR OH/IR M . S c h u l t h e i s e t a l . : N e a r - I R s p e c t r o s c o p y o f I S O G A L s o u r c e s 1 3 A54 A55 A56 A57 A58 A59 A60 A61 A62 A64 A66 A67 A68 A69 A70 A71 A72 A74 A75 A76 A77 A78 A79 B7 B13 B14 B15 B17 B18 B19 B20 B22 B23 B27 B28 B31 B32 B35 B37 B40 C3 C6 C10 C14 17 45 16.7 17 45 17.5 17 45 18.0 17 45 18.8 17 45 19.4 17 45 20.5 17 45 20.9 17 45 21.5 17 45 21.9 17 45 26.4 17 45 27.5 17 45 28.4 17 45 28.5 17 45 29.5 17 45 30.5 17 45 34.4 17 45 36.0 17 45 38.2 17 45 40.0 17 45 40.7 17 45 40.7 17 45 41.4 17 45 43.4 17 43 48.6 17 44 4.7 17 44 7.5 17 44 8.1 17 44 11.5 17 44 12.7 17 44 12.8 17 44 16.5 17 44 17.6 17 44 17.8 17 44 21.7 17 44 22.8 17 44 27.4 17 44 27.5 17 44 29.9 17 44 33.8 17 44 44.5 17 42 58.8 17 43 3.4 17 43 11.2 17 43 14.7 -29 7 34.3 -29 10 18.9 -29 8 42.9 -29 5 5.4 -29 14 5.9 -29 7 19.5 -29 13 42.4 -29 6 36.5 -29 13 44.3 -29 8 4.2 -29 4 39.9 -29 4 22.9 -29 18 5.0 -29 9 16.6 -29 15 50.9 -29 12 54.2 -29 4 38.1 -29 17 20.1 -29 16 2.8 -29 4 27.7 -29 14 54.7 -29 13 43.6 -29 13 29.1 -29 27 18.8 -29 25 18.7 -29 27 37.6 -29 32 22.5 -29 31 31.1 -29 31 24.6 -29 26 55.5 -29 26 7.7 -29 25 58.9 -29 27 13.0 -29 27 36.2 -29 34 55.0 -29 38 5.8 -29 28 52.8 -29 28 57.3 -29 23 57.8 -29 31 36.8 -29 49 59.9 -29 38 1.5 -29 51 29.8 -29 37 49.9 -- 14.18 -- -- -- -- -- -- 13.75 -- 16.14 15.60 -- -- 14.76 -- -- 13.69 14.22 15.27 -- 15.99 15.16 -- -- 13.94 13.99 15.16 15.91 13.22 -- -- 14.07 -- -- 15.80 -- -- 15.80 -- 15.57 -- 13.31 15.32 10.80 9.19 9.39 10.05 8.57 10.54 8.80 10.13 8.62 8.67 9.97 9.27 10.30 10.35 9.54 9.90 10.36 9.05 8.11 9.59 10.12 10.08 10.42 11.54 10.51 6.64 6.86 9.30 9.30 6.72 10.56 10.99 7.80 10.35 10.46 8.70 11.27 10.38 9.75 10.41 9.60 9.36 7.14 9.26 8.56 7.19 6.79 7.69 4.08 6.29 6.68 6.59 6.61 4.63 7.91 6.88 8.35 4.87 7.16 4.30 7.42 6.79 4.62 7.76 4.31 8.36 9.18 8.16 6.58 2.40 2.67 5.41 6.98 3.02 8.37 99.99 3.99 6.27 7.36 4.47 8.14 7.84 6.73 8.00 5.91 4.02 4.52 6.62 Table A1 (cont.) 6.77 5.59 5.22 6.08 2.02 4.29 5.18 4.99 4.87 2.69 6.06 3.90 99.99 3.06 5.65 2.71 4.94 4.80 2.82 6.17 2.40 6.93 7.26 99.99 2.91 0.59 0.85 3.20 5.25 0.98 6.49 6.34 1.28 2.61 5.47 2.34 6.11 5.47 4.64 5.23 3.59 1.58 1.49 4.49 22.90 23.50 22.80 25.90 21.00 23.90 23.90 24.00 21.90 23.60 24.50 25.00 19.30 22.50 24.50 24.50 24.80 20.40 22.50 24.10 23.20 20.50 21.30 27.20 28.20 28.60 28.50 28.50 29.40 29.00 29.00 28.80 29.00 29.60 27.00 27.30 34.90 32.30 29.80 27.00 18.40 22.00 20.30 22.80 15.51 22.39 21.33 20.37 18.28 20.85 19.69 18.46 23.40 19.96 22.98 22.45 19.83 7.59 21.55 14.15 20.18 20.94 11.02 20.53 14.51 23.56 16.47 11.25 17.49 23.84 23.36 19.93 23.61 27.10 21.52 17.41 -1.21 0.92 24.17 13.17 23.83 -0.75 -0.73 22.41 25.42 13.47 18.34 19.37 2.97 6.42 5.60 4.82 2.32 3.16 5.00 2.97 5.88 5.88 5.62 5.22 4.46 0.23 6.38 1.43 5.78 5.41 2.48 5.19 2.26 5.46 2.48 0.95 4.07 4.72 4.88 5.49 4.07 3.79 3.85 3.79 -1.06 1.26 5.40 1.78 5.62 0.09 0.69 5.60 5.21 0.84 0.49 2.59 4.24 2.94 2.88 3.82 -0.75 -0.45 1.04 -0.32 4.14 1.98 3.06 2.80 4.13 -0.91 2.22 -0.63 2.50 2.68 0.32 2.98 0.94 3.39 2.19 1.69 4.14 3.82 3.35 2.68 5.65 3.68 4.81 4.86 -0.15 0.52 5.22 2.24 4.40 0.76 1.10 4.47 3.22 0.23 0.94 1.37 -54.35 -173.11 -89.14 -27.65 -806.41 -252.72 -276.51 -573.02 -129.72 -416.59 -88.49 -171.28 -16.33 236.30 -127.51 -620.11 -129.24 -95.58 -341.28 -80.12 -52.42 -88.19 -78.17 -70.05 -48.80 -36.04 9.05 -115.19 -229.09 -45.72 -57.55 -3.47 -0.34 -2.38 -97.87 -317.56 37.23 -2.22 14.83 0.04 -279.57 -541.95 -744.63 -529.80 -2.75 -4.56 -4.19 -3.71 -5.25 -3.37 -4.80 -3.77 -4.77 -5.17 -3.39 -4.21 2504.72 -4.10 -4.29 -5.03 -3.33 -4.38 -5.30 -3.88 -4.62 -2.76 -3.05 2504.72 -3.75 -7.41 -7.19 -5.10 -4.64 -7.43 -3.50 2504.72 -6.53 -4.06 -3.49 -5.31 -3.33 -3.94 -4.62 -3.41 -3.63 -5.11 -5.92 -4.00 -6.44 -7.04 -6.30 -6.73 -5.09 -5.23 -7.05 -5.68 -6.69 -5.31 -6.70 -5.59 -3.70 -4.95 -6.72 -4.99 -5.56 -6.10 -5.55 -7.42 -4.88 -7.50 -7.58 -3.70 -4.96 -5.40 -5.41 -5.38 -6.93 -5.54 -6.86 -6.21 -- -- -5.87 -5.26 -6.11 -- -- -5.76 -5.19 -4.85 -5.35 -5.84 RGB AGB AGB AGB OH/IR LPV AGB LPV AGB OH/IR RGB AGB AGB LPV AGB OH/IR AGB AGB AGB AGB AGB RGB RGB AGB AGB supergiant supergiant AGB AGB supergiant RGB AGB YSO YSO RGB AGB RGB YSO YSO RGB AGB AGB AGB AGB 1 4 M . S c h u l t h e i s e t a l . : N e a r - I R s p e c t r o s c o p y o f I S O G A L s o u r c e s C19 C23 C25 C45 D5 D6 D7 D11 D13 D22 E4 E5 E13 E20 E51 F13 F14 F23 G35 G46 H01 17 43 19.3 17 43 24.6 17 43 25.0 17 43 44.2 17 42 27.3 17 42 28.0 17 42 29.9 17 42 44.4 17 42 47.7 17 43 29.8 17 43 13.0 17 43 15.5 17 43 28.2 17 43 39.2 17 44 35.0 17 42 28.0 17 42 39.5 17 40 36.3 17 43 16.4 17 44 7.5 17 30 53.2 -29 50 28.9 -29 53 12.4 -29 41 23.0 -29 38 26.1 -29 54 17.8 -29 56 14.6 -30 1 15.9 -29 58 36.1 -29 56 25.5 -30 1 27.3 -29 21 1.4 -29 24 58.7 -29 17 41.7 -29 22 44.5 -29 4 35.5 -29 37 46.4 -29 43 27.3 -29 49 13.7 -30 13 10.7 -30 7 41.3 -33 40 21.7 13.92 14.33 -- 15.61 13.28 13.90 -- 14.03 -- 12.17 -- 11.51 11.33 -- -- 15.21 15.36 11.51 14.14 14.09 15.72 10.98 8.56 9.32 9.75 8.04 10.55 10.97 7.94 9.56 7.89 7.22 6.58 6.93 10.61 9.09 9.87 9.91 8.18 10.98 8.63 10.53 6.53 6.89 5.37 7.50 6.50 3.87 3.36 4.60 6.74 5.73 5.32 4.87 5.21 6.61 1.30 5.23 4.95 5.71 4.95 5.32 5.53 Table A1 (cont.): 3.80 4.82 3.19 4.33 4.44 0.13 -0.06 2.39 4.40 3.59 4.33 4.07 4.67 4.24 -0.39 3.01 3.13 2.21 2.91 3.46 2.92 22.50 23.60 25.00 23.80 20.30 24.30 22.40 26.00 27.90 19.00 23.30 25.70 22.70 25.50 20.10 17.00 21.50 9.80 16.30 20.60 10.80 -3.64 25.90 16.35 25.52 13.49 -1.00 0.87 12.16 22.36 21.64 20.36 23.21 20.18 19.69 10.11 20.61 18.15 10.91 19.06 18.51 13.11 -0.58 5.16 3.10 5.19 3.05 0.03 1.20 1.85 5.19 1.69 4.41 5.36 4.05 3.39 1.60 2.00 2.57 0.91 1.77 3.51 2.50 0.12 4.89 3.17 3.28 2.79 1.44 1.76 0.66 4.34 2.07 2.70 3.04 2.13 1.65 0.61 1.12 3.08 2.72 0.82 1.45 1.43 -50.59 -237.00 -223.55 -279.99 -364.41 -57.42 -82.31 -544.74 -115.25 -1020.49 -221.63 -109.75 -193.37 -162.79 -297.85 -763.02 -186.75 -597.37 -340.69 -506.89 -492.72 -4.24 -4.79 -4.57 -3.72 -5.02 2504.72 2504.72 -5.89 -4.40 -5.49 -6.38 -7.64 -7.05 -3.31 -8.22 -3.87 -4.24 -4.49 -3.94 -4.69 -3.36 -- -6.84 -5.29 -5.53 -6.75 -- -- -5.54 -5.80 -5.99 -8.66 -11.67 -12.24 -5.22 -4.61 -4.96 -5.04 -5.06 -4.75 -5.55 -4.77 YSO AGB AGB AGB AGB YSO YSO AGB AGB AGB AGB AGB AGB AGB OH/IR AGB AGB AGB AGB AGB AGB M . S c h u l t h e i s e t a l . : N e a r - I R s p e c t r o s c o p y o f I S O G A L s o u r c e s 1 5 16 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources Fig. B.1. Young stellar objects Fig. B.2. Supergiants candidates M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 17 Fig. B.3. OH/IR stars (Wood et al. 1998) 18 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources Fig. B.4. Long period Variables (Glass et al. 2001) M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 19 Fig. B.5. AGB star candidates 20 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources Fig. B.5. (continued) Fig. B.5. (continued) M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 21 22 M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources Fig. B.5. (continued) M. Schultheis et al.: Near-IR spectroscopy of ISOGAL sources 23 Fig. B.6. Red giant candidates
astro-ph/0702165	1	0702	2007-02-06T17:48:04	Potential Magnetic Field around a Helical Flux-rope Current Structure in the Solar Corona	[ "astro-ph" ]	We consider the potential magnetic field associated with a helical electric line current flow, idealizing the near-potential coronal field within which a highly localized twisted current structure is embedded. It is found that this field has a significant axial component off the helical magnetic axis where there is no current flow, such that the flux winds around the axis. The helical line current field, in including the effects of flux rope writhe, is therefore more topologically complex than straight line and ring current fields sometimes used in solar flux rope models. The axial flux in magnetic fields around confined current structures may be affected by the writhe of these current structures such that the field twists preferentially with the same handedness as the writhe. This property of fields around confined current structures with writhe may be relevant to classes of coronal magnetic flux rope, including structures observed to have sigmoidal forms in soft X-rays and prominence magnetic fields. For example, ``bald patches'' and the associated heating by Parker current sheet dissipation seem likely. Thus some measurements of flux rope magnetic helicities may derive from external, near-potential fields. The predicted hemispheric preference for positive and negative magnetic helicities is consistent with observational results for prominences and sigmoids and past theoretical results for flux rope internal fields.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Potential Magnetic Field around a Helical Flux-rope Current Structure in the Solar Corona G.J.D. Petrie National Solar Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719; [email protected] 7 0 0 2 b e F 6 1 v 5 6 1 2 0 7 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a ABSTRACT We consider the potential magnetic field associated with a helical electric line current flow, idealizing the near-potential coronal field within which a highly localized twisted current structure is embedded. It is found that this field has a significant axial component off the helical magnetic axis where there is no current flow, such that the flux winds around the axis. The helical line current field, in including the effects of flux rope writhe, is therefore more topologically complex than straight line and ring current fields sometimes used in solar flux rope models. The axial flux in magnetic fields around confined current structures may be affected by the writhe of these current structures such that the field twists preferentially with the same handedness as the writhe. This property of fields around confined current structures with writhe may be relevant to classes of coronal magnetic flux rope, including structures observed to have sigmoidal forms in soft X-rays and prominence magnetic fields. For example, "bald patches" and the associated heating by Parker current sheet dissipation seem likely. Thus some measurements of flux rope magnetic helicities may derive from external, near- potential fields. The predicted hemispheric preference for positive and negative magnetic helicities is consistent with observational results for prominences and sigmoids and past theoretical results for flux rope internal fields. Subject headings: magnetohydrodynamics: Sun, solar magnetic fields, solar corona 1. Introduction Magnetic fields emerge into the solar atmosphere with significant twist (Leka et al. (1996). Solar coronal eruptions are believed to be caused by the ultimate failure of the confinement of highly twisted magnetic fields (Low 1996, 2001). The new twisted flux does not immedi- ately mix with the flux already there, but maintains its identity. This is because the nearly perfectly conducting plasma and magnetic flux are frozen together except for field recon- nection which occurs only on very small scales. Old and new flux systems find new mutual -- 2 -- equilibrium states via successive reconnections and dynamical relaxations. Taylor's (1986) theory has described turbulent relaxation to a minimum energy state, a linear force-free field, under the postulated conservation of magnetic helicity contained in the plasma, a postulate shown to be relevant to coronal plasma by Berger (1984). In the open environment of the solar atmosphere, the dispersal of magnetic helicity occurs in an unbounded volume so that the ultimate minimum energy state in the absence of further helicity injection is a potential field. Well-confined structures may maintain their integrity within a near-potential ambient field for long periods. Examples of confined current structures embedded in relatively current-free surround- ings are flux ropes associated with prominences and x-ray sigmoids. Observations of flux ropes have repeatedly yielded evidence of helical structure (Rust & Kumar 1996, Chen et al. 1997, 2000, Dere et al. 1999, Wood et al. 1999, Ciaravella et al. 2000, Gary & Moore 2004). Observations (Leroy et al. 1984, 1989, Bommier et al. 1994, Lin et al. 1998) have con- sistently emphasized the presence of strong axial components of prominence magnetic fields. Amari & Aly (1989, 1992) modeled prominences by embedding line currents and current sheets in twisted force-free magnetic fields. Employing line-current and current sheet solu- tions, Low & Hundhausen (1995) demonstrated the necessity of spatially distributed currents, associated with axial magnetic flux, for prominence support. Here the mathematical prob- lem can be simplified by assuming that the prominence plasma is cold enough for the width of the plasma condensation to be negligibly thin relative to the scale of the global field con- figuration. This is reasonable since the hydrostatic scale height at prominence temperatures, a few hundred km, is much smaller than the characteristic length of the large-scale magnetic field, about 105 km. On the other hand, sigmoids have been identified with plasma structures heated by Parker current sheet dissipation (Titov & D´emoulin 1999, Low & Berger 2003). Flux sur- faces consisting of field trajectories which graze the photosphere, known as bald patches (Titov & D´emoulin 1999) are likely locations for the formation of magnetic tangential dis- continuities between twisted coronal field and the photosphere. The two observed sigmoidal shapes, the S-shape and its mirror-reflection, the Z-shape, are each found in both hemi- spheres of the solar corona, but preferentially in the northern and southern hemispheres respectively. Associating Z- and S-shaped sigmoids with flux ropes of negative and positive magnetic helicities respectively, Low & Berger (2003) found a connection between the writhe that the axial flux in fields around twisted current structures is biased by the writhe of these current structures. This bias is such that the observed left-handed and right-handed twists of flux ropes in the northern and southern hemispheres may be connected to the hemispheric preferences for the two sigmoidal shapes via the fields around these flux ropes. Observations -- 3 -- of both prominence and sigmoidal flux ropes indicate a hemispheric preference for the hand- edness of twist of these structures (Canfield & Pevtsov 1999, Chae 2000, Pevtsov, Canfield & Latushko 2001). Titov & D´emoulin (1999) modeled a flux rope using a ring current, with current dis- tributed across a ring of small but finite radius. An axial field component was produced by threading a line current through the center of this ring. The field outside the ring is poten- tial. Low & Berger (2003) constructed their flux rope using helically symmetric magneto- hydrostatic solutions embedded within an ambient field described by Gold & Hoyle's (1960) linear force-free field. In this paper we shift focus to the field around a localized twisted current-carrying structure: using the potential field around a helical line current we study the relatively unstressed field within which a flux rope with twisted axis (writhe) is embed- ded. 2. Magnetohydrostatics and the helical line current Consider the static equilibrium of a the magnetic field, denoted by B, in the absence of significant plasma forces. The balance of forces is described by j × B − ∇p − ρgz = 0, 1 4π (∇ × B) = j, ∇ · B = 0, (1) (2) (3) Wherever the first term on the left-hand side of Equation (1) is much larger than the other two terms, as is often the case for the solar corona, the force-free approximation applies: Here α is a function of space which, by Equation (3), must be constant along field lines, ∇ × B = αB. B · ∇α = 0. (4) (5) Further sub-cases of interest for the study of the corona are the linear force-free case, in which α = α0 is constant and equation (4) becomes linear, and the potential-field (current-free) subcase where this constant α0 = 0. This paper focuses on a special magnetic field which -- 4 -- falls into the category of potential field everywhere except a single helical line along which an electric current of infinitesimally thin width flows. This line current represents a highly twisted flux rope within which all forces of equation (1) may be important but outside which the field has relaxed to a near-potential state. Such a field does not explicitly include forces and the line current may be regarded as the limiting case of a class of nonlinear force-free fields whose currents are concentrated along helical axes. Using Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) with y in the vertical direction, we define the half-space y > 0 to be the corona. Defining the cylindrical coordinates with translational symmetry in the z-direction, x = r cos ϕ, y = r sin ϕ. (6) Coronal magnetic flux ropes usually lie along relatively straight polarity inversion lines (PILs) at the base of the corona, and may be idealized to be locally 2D with invariance in the direction of the PIL. Here we are more interested in the global 3D geometry of the ambient field than with the central structure.We define the helical coordinate ζ = ϕ − kz. (7) Lines of constant ζ wind around the cylindrical axis of symmetry x = y = 0 a full turn over a distance 2π/k units along that axis. In a Cartesian 2D field the magnetic surfaces are determined by the conservation of longitudinal magnetic flux and in an axisymmetric field the azimuthal flux is conserved. The flux surfaces of a helical field are determined by the conservation of the linear combination ψ = 1 2π (Ψz − Ψϕ), of ϕ- and z-directed fluxes Ψz =Z Bz(r, ζ)r dr dz, Ψϕ =Z Bϕ(r, ζ) dr dz = 1 k Z Bϕ(r, ζ) dr dϕ. We define this flux function ψ(r, ζ) as follows: rBr = ∂ψ ∂ζ , (8) (9) (10) -- 5 -- Bϕ − krBz = − ∂ψ ∂r . (11) This solves Equation (3), fixing the field components in the r and ∇ζ directions but leaving the component in the r × ∇ζ direction free. From the ϕ- and z-components of Equation (1) this component Bz + krBϕ is a free function F (ψ) of the flux function ψ (Neukirch 1999). Therefore the magnetic field takes the form (Low & Berger 2003) where B = 1 r ∂ψ ∂ζ r + 1 1 + k2r2 ∂ψ ∂r a + F (ψ) 1 + k2r2 b, a = ϕ − krz, b = kr ϕ + z, (12) (13) and the equilibrium of Equation (1) is described in this case by the Grad-Shafranov equation (Freidberg 1980, Low & Berger 2003), 1 r ∂ ∂r (cid:18) 1 1 + k2r2 ∂ψ ∂r(cid:19) + 1 r2 ∂2ψ ∂ζ 2 − 2kF (1 + k2r2)2 + 1 1 + k2r2 F dF dψ + 4π dp dψ = 0. (14) This equation ignores gravity because helical symmetry and gravitational stratification are mutually exclusive. Here p must be a function of the flux function ψ (Freidberg 1987, Neukirch 1999). The force-free case is p ≡ 0 and the linear force-free and potential cases by F = α0ψ and F ≡ 0. In the present work we are ignoring plasma forces. Since we are modeling our magnetic filament using a line current, our model does not resolve the physics of this current. In real systems the current will have a field-aligned component not associated with a Lorentz force and a further component associated with such a force. Here, these details are collapsed into a helical line of infinitesimally small width, within which all currents are confined. The linear force-free form of this Equation (14) has eigenfunctions composed of Bessel functions of r and cosines of ζ. Gold & Hoyle's (1960) force-free flux rope solution, whose field lines are confined to lines of constant ζ, is the degenerate case ψ = constant with F a non-zero constant. To find the magnetic field of a single helical line current, we follow Morozov & Solov'ev (1966) in first representing the potential fields B = ∇φi inside and B = ∇φe outside the cylinder r = a associated with current flowing in the surface of the cylinder with components -- 6 -- j = inka sin nζ ϕ + in cos nζ z φ(r, ζ) =(cid:26) φi(r, ζ), φe(r, ζ), for r < a, for r > a, with the potential where φi = ai nIn(nkr) sin nζ, φe = ae nIn(nkr) sin nζ. (15) (16) (17) The boundary conditions at the boundary of the cylinder, derived from Equation (2), are Bi r − Be r = 0, Bi ϕ − Be ϕ = − 4π c jz, Bi z − Be z = 4π c jϕ. Using the identity I ′ n(x)Kn(x) − K ′ n(x)In(x) = 1/x the coefficients are found to be ai n = 4πka2in c K ′ n(nka), ae n = 4πka2in c I ′ n(nka). (18) (19) Now a single helical line current of strength I on the cylindrical surface is described by jz = I k δ(ζ − ζ0) = jϕ = Ikδ(ζ − ζ0) = I 2πk 1 + 2 2π 1 + 2 Ik cos n(ζ − ζ0)! , cos n(ζ − ζ0)! , ∞ ∞ Xn=1 Xn=1 The zeroth harmonics are the constant fields Bi 0 = 2Ik c z, Be 0 = 2I cr ϕ, (20) (21) (22) where the superscripts indicate internal and external solutions as usual, and the full po- tentials for the interior and exterior fields are found by summing the other harmonics of Equation (17), -- 7 -- φi = φe = K ∞ 2Ik c z + Xn=1 c ϕ + 2k2 Xn=1 ∞ 2I ′ n(nka)In(nkr) sin n(ζ − ζ0)! , n(nka)Kn(nkr) sin n(ζ − ζ0)! . ′ I Therefore the magnetic field is given by ∞ B(r, ζ) = 4k2a Xn=1 + 4ka Xn=1 r ∞ +2kI z, nK ′ nK n(nka)I ′ n(nkr) sin n(ζ − ζ0)! r n(nka)In(nkr) cos n(ζ − ζ0)! a ′ inside the cylinder and ∞ B(r, ζ) = 4k2a Xn=1 + 4ka Xn=1 r ∞ +2kI ϕ, ′ nI n(nka)K ′ n(nkr) sin n(ζ − ζ0)! r n(nka)Kn(nkr) cos n(ζ − ζ0)! a ′ nI (23) (24) (25) (26) outside the cylinder. The flux function ψ(r, ζ) is found in practice from the vector potential A, such that B = ∇ × A: ψ = krAϕ + Az. This vector potential has been calculated by Tominaka (2004) and the results are given in the Appendix. Sample contour plots of both the potential phi(r, ζ) and the flux function psi(r, ζ) are shown in Figure 1 for selected values of helical winding number k. Unlike in the 2D Cartesian and axisymmetric cases, the helical flux function does not serve as a matched Euler potential for the magnetic field with the ignorable coordinate, i.e., the vector ∇ψ × ∇ζ. Therefore the flux function ψ and the scalar potential φ do not have contour curves perpendicular to each other everywhere in the r-ζ plane, as Figure 1 clearly shows. The flux contours are squeezed in the region between the helical axis and the axis r = 0 because of their relative proximity to the rest of the current and -- 8 -- intense magnetic field in the configuration. This effect increases as k increases until a local extremum of the flux function develops close to r = 0. As Morozov & Solov'ev (1966) report, the presence of flux function extrema in regions where current flow does not occur. This contrasts with the 2D Cartesian case where the maximum principle for Laplace's equation forbids closed flux contours in current-free regions. These second extrema may be regarded as low-lying loops beneath the flux rope. There is a further departure from the simpler 2D Cartesian and axisymmetric cases. The quantity F = Bz + krBϕ = 2kI, (27) is non-zero, which contrasts with Equation (12) for the potential case F ≡ 0. The non-zero F is entirely due to the zeroth harmonics of Equation (22), which are necessary for a correct description of an infinitesimally thin helical tube of current. This field has a strong axial (b-directed) component, unlike the simpler straight line current and circular ring current solutions (Jackson 1965, Low & Hundhausen 1995). In constructing their circular current structure, Titov & D´emoulin (1999) found it necessary to thread a straight line current through their current ring in order to produce an axial magnetic field component. In contrast, our helical line current naturally produces a significant axial field component because of the skewed curvature of the current trajectory. Figure 2 shows sample field lines for the case k = 1. The presence of axially-directed magnetic flux is clear. The magnetic field structure has the familiar appearance of a twisted flux rope confined within a relatively unsheared arcade. The existence of strong axial field components has been a strikingly consistent feature of prominence observations (Leroy et al. 1984, 1989, Bommier et al. 1994, Lin et al. 1998). Low & Hundhausen (1995) proved that spatially distributed currents, associated with axially- directed magnetic flux, are a necessary condition for prominence support. Here we are less concerned with the weight support problem than with relating the axial flux around the flux rope to the global structure of the rope, in particular the writhe. While these internal and external axial fluxes play separate roles in the physics of the prominence flux rope, they may be coupled in some way. In real systems it is likely that spatially distributed currents of complex structure exist in the vicinity of the flux rope concentration itself. This flux could flow in either axial direction producing flux twisting in either direction about the helical axis. However, the fact that the field surrounding a flux rope with writhe has axial flux even in the absence of local currents implies a preferred direction for axial flux determined by the writhe of the rope. Thus we expect a preference for right-handed and left-handed twist around right-handed and left-handed flux ropes respectively. -- 9 -- Fig. 1. -- Magnetic potential contours (left pictures) and magnetic flux function contours (right pictures) for the cases k = 0.5 (top), k = 1.0 (middle) and k = 2.0 (bottom). -- 10 -- The axial flux of the helical line current potential field may also have a bearing on the hemispheric preference of S-shaped sigmoids and their mirror reflections, which we call Z- shaped after Low & Berger (2003). Z- and S-shaped sigmoids are associated with flux ropes with positive and negative magnetic helicities respectively. There is no unique relationship between magnetic Z and S shapes on the one hand and the sign of the magnetic helicity on the other because the signs of the writhe of a flux rope and the internal magnetic helicity of the field inside the rope are distinct. Moreover, a flux rope of a fixed helicity can have some field trajectories project into S shapes and others into Z shapes. The twist of the line current in the example in Figure 2 is right-handed. The twist of the field trajectories around this line current is also right-handed. This line current is parallel to a Gold-Hoyle magnetic field trajectory. If the shapes of this line current trajectory projected on the atmospheric base y = 0 is identified with the shapes of observed sigmoids, this solution implies an association of positive magnetic helicity, that is, a right-handed wind of lines of force, with Z sigmoids. If we reverse the sign of the entire field, the field preserves its handedness and sign of magnetic helicity because magnetic helicity and handedness are independent of the direction of the magnetic field. If we reverse the sign of the parameter k we obtain the mirror reflection of the solution in Figure 2. In the mirror-reflected solution, the field now has negative helicity and a left-handed wind in its fields. Its line current projected onto y = 0 would then be shaped like an S sigmoid. A direct association of the handedness of the line current twist to sigmoidal shape identifies sigmoidal shapes with the writhes of flux ropes. This is equivalent to Low & Berger's association of their Gold-Hoyle external fields with sigmoidal patterns since our line currents are parallel to Gold-Hoyle fields. If the observed coronal sigmoids are interpreted in terms of these associations, the implication is that positive and negative helicities are preferentially found in the northern and southern hemispheres. As Low & Berger explain, this contradicts the hemispherical preference effect for prominence and sigmoid flux ropes. Low & Berger resolved this inconsistency by demonstrating that field trajectories within their flux rope winding around a right-handed axis of helical symmetry with right-handed twist (γ = α0/k > 0) grazing the atmospheric base project onto the atmospheric base as S-shapes. Left-twisted lines about a right-twisted axis do not do this so readily. Anchored field lines rising from the photosphere may wind more than once in the atmosphere before exiting the atmosphere through their second footpoints. Such winding lines may tangentially touch the atmospheric base from above only to return into the atmosphere. Low & Berger demonstrated that the heated plasma in a sigmoid might arise from current sheets forming within a flux rope as opposed to deriving from an external field, and that the sigmoidal shape may be related more to the topology of the flux rope internal field than the topology -- 11 -- of the external field. We have seen that the sigmoidal shapes that a Gold-Hoyle field would produce would not conform to the hemispherical preference of sigmoidal shapes described above. In contrast, a field within a helically symmetric flux rope of right-handed writhe, with right-handed twist about the helical axis is likely to include lines winding about the axis more than once, grazing the photosphere on the way. Such lines tend to project as S-shapes. On the other hand, the Gold-Hoyle field has linear field-aligned currents and does not closely approximate an ambient coronal field in a relaxed, near-potential equilibrium. The magnetic flux trajectories associated with this helical line-current wind more than a full turn about the rope axis in the atmosphere whereas the Gold-Hoyle field is directed parallel to it. For example, there is a particular field line in Figure 2 which dips very close to the atmospheric base, almost grazing it just above the origin at the center of the domain. This line projects as an S-shape and would show up as a bright heated structure. Such a relationship between sigmoidal shapes and magnetic helicities invokes certain physical properties of the heated plasma. The force-free field of the domain where our model is meaningful, y > 0, may be regarded to match discontinuously a distinct field under different physical conditions in y < 0, since the atmospheric layers between the corona and the photosphere are comparatively very thin. The flux surface containing all fields grazing the photosphere is tangential to the boundary y = 0 between a tenuous atmosphere and a dense region below. Even if the field varies continuously across this boundary, the field immediately above our grazing field is locally unanchored while the field immediately below this grazing field locally threads across y = 0 and is rigidly anchored by the dense region in y < 0. If perturbed, the field above has much more freedom of movement than the field below, and so tangential discontinuities are likely to form and dissipate (Parker 1994) in the neighborhood of the grazing field. Such a region of grazing field is called a "bald patch" by Titov & D´emoulin (1999), who first cited such regions as likely sites of current sheet formation and heating. Since thermal conduction is much more effective along than across magnetic flux trajectories, thermal conduction heats up all plasmas that are magnetically connected to the heated region. Therefore it is reasonable to interpret the sigmoidal emission patterns as picking out flux trajectories threading threading through bald patches where tangential discontinuities have formed. Trajectories executing a couple of turns about the axis tend to project as S-shapes. Therefore, like Low & Berger's internal field and unlike the Gold-Hoyle field, the potential field around a helical line current is capable of reconciling the hemispheric preferences for magnetic helicity and for sigmoidal shape.Fields both inside and outside current-carrying flux ropes may be contributing to this hemispheric preference. The helical line current -- 12 -- solution leads us to expect that magnetic fields surrounding flux ropes of a given handedness prefer to twist about this current structure with the same handedness. In reality, a flux rope which has initially acquired twist through the kink instability can readily transfer some of its twist to writhe of the same handedness, and this can create twist of this handedness in the surrounding field. This makes these fields a viable source of "bald patches", Parker current sheets and sigmoidal emission patterns. -- 13 -- Fig. 2. -- Some sample magnetic flux trajectories for the case k = 1, viewed from an oblique angle (top left), from above (top right), along the x-axis (bottom left) and along the y-axis (bottom right). The shading of the coronal base y = 0 represents the vertical field component from white, maximum positive flux, to black, maximum negative flux. -- 14 -- 3. Conclusion Using a simple solution for the magnetic field associated with a helical line current, we have investigated some consequences of the writhe of coronal magnetic flux ropes for the near- potential magnetic field within which they are embedded. Magnetostatic solutions in realistic three-dimensional geometry are generally intractable because of the complex structure of the governing equations. Two simplifications allow us to investigate some consequences of three- dimensional structure. The idealization of highly twisted, confined magnetic flux ropes as line currents allows us to focus on the relatively current free field around a flux rope without having to treat the full magnetohydrostatic problem. No solutions are known which combine a current-carrying flux rope field and a potential ambient coronal field. Such an equilibrium is likely to require a numerical treatment. Helical symmetry is imposed so that the governing equation becomes the helical Grad-Shafranov equation, an elliptic equation with a linear differential operator whose source solution describes a line current and can be computed in closed analytical form. The most striking difference between potential fields around straight line currents and ring currents on the one hand and potential fields around helical line currents on the other is the existence of axially-directed magnetic flux in the helical case. The helical line current field, in including the effects of flux rope writhe, is therefore more topologically complex than these straight line and ring current fields sometimes used in solar flux rope models. Since axial magnetic flux is central to the study of coronal flux ropes, this geometry-dependent presence of axial flux may help us to understand some processes behind solar activity. The two main manifestations of solar activity in the corona, flares and coronal mass ejections, are believed to be related to the evolution of flux ropes associated with prominences and x-ray sigmoids (Low 1996, 2001). The axial field component of the helical line-current potential field manifests itself as a twist of the potential field about the helical axis whose handedness is the same as that of the axis writhe. This suggests that near-potential fields around flux ropes with writhe of a given handedness twist preferentially with the same handedness as that writhe. This may have a bearing on the interpretation of observations of certain classes of coronal magnetic flux rope, including x-ray sigmoids and prominence magnetic fields. As we have seen, the preference for flux-rope writhe and external magnetic field twist to have the same handedness suggest that "bald patches" might tend to occur in such fields, and therefore the associated heating by Parker current sheet dissipation seem likely. Thus some measurements of flux rope magnetic helicities may derive from external, near-potential fields. The predicted sta- tistical hemispheric preference for positive and negative magnetic helicities is consistent with observational results for prominences and sigmoids and past theoretical results for flux rope -- 15 -- internal fields. I thank the referee for helpful comments. This work was conducted while the author was a participant in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Postdoctoral Program at Goddard Space Flight Center, and was based at National Solar Observatory, Tucson. A. Magnetic vector potential of helical line current This calculation is given in full by Tominaka (2004) and we quote the results here. The magnetic vector potential associated with a known electric line current is given by (Jackson 1965) A =Z j dS r − r′ (A1) where j is given by Equations (15), describing an infinitely thin helical current embedded in the cylindrical surface r = a, which we denote by S. The three components of A are Ar =(cid:26) −2kaIP∞ −2kaIP∞ n=1[Kn+1(nka)In+1(nkr) − Kn−1(nka)In−1(nkr)] sin n(ζ − ζ0), n=1[In+1(nka)Kn+1(nkr) − In−1(nka)Kn−1(nkr)] sin n(ζ − ζ0), for r ≤ a, for r > a, (A2) n=1[Kn+1(nka)In+1(nkr) + Kn−1(nka)In−1(nkr)] cos n(ζ − ζ0), n=1[In+1(nka)Kn+1(nkr) + In−1(nka)Kn−1(nkr)] cos n(ζ − ζ0), for r ≤ a, for r > a, (A3) n=1 Kn(nka)In(nkr) cos n(ζ − ζ0), n=1 In(nka)Kn(nkr) cos n(ζ − ζ0), for r ≤ a, for r > a. (A4) Ik a2 Aϕ =( Ikr + 2IkaP∞ r + 2IkaP∞ Az =(cid:26) −2 log a + 4IP∞ −2 log r + 4IP∞ Amari, T., & Aly, J. J. 1989, A&A, 208, 261 REFERENCES -- 16 -- Amari, T., & Aly, J. J. 1992, A&A, 265, 791 Anzer, U. 1989, in Dynamics and Structures of Quiescent Prominences, ed. E. R. Priest (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 143 Bommier, V., Landi Degl'Innocenti, E., Leroy, J. L., & Sahal-Brchot, S. 1994, Sol. Phys., 154, 231 Canfield, R.C., & Pevtsov, A.A. 1999, in Magnetic Helicity in Space and Laboratory Plasmas, ed. M. R. Brown, R. Canfield, & A. Petsov (Geophys. Monogr. 111; Washington, DC: AGU), 197 Casini, R., & Judge, P. G. 1999, ApJ, 522, 524 Casini, R., Lopez Ariste, A. L., Tomczyk, S., & Lites, B. W. 2003, ApJ, 598, L67 Chae, J. 2000, ApJ, 540, L115 Chen, J., Howard, R.A., Brueckner, G.E., Santoro, R., Krall, J., Paswaters, S.E., et al. 1997, ApJ 409, L191 Chen, J., Santoro, R. A., Krall, J., Howard, R. A., Duffin, R., Moses, J. D., et al. 2000, ApJ 533, 481 Ciaravella, A., Raymond, J.C., Thompson, B.J., Van Ballegooijen, A., Strachan, L., Gardner, L., et al. 2001, ApJ 529, 575 Dere, K.P., Brueckner, G.E., Howard, R.A., Michels, D.J., and Delaboudiniere, J.P. 1999, ApJ 516, 465 Fan, Y., & Gibson, S. E. 2003, ApJ, 589, L105 Fan, Y., & Gibson, S. E. 2004, ApJ, 609, 1123 Freidberg, J.P. 1987, Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics (New York: Plenum Press) Gary, A., and Moore, R.L. 2004, ApJ 611, 545 Gold, T. & Hoyle, F. MNRAS 120, 189 House, L.L. & Smart, R.N. 1982, Sol. Phys. 80, 53 Jackson, J.D. 1965, Classical Electrodynamics (New York: John Wiley & Sons) -- 17 -- Leroy, J.L. 1989, in Dynamics and Structure of Quiescent Solar Prominences, ed. E.R. Priest (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 77 Leroy, J. L., Bommier, V., & Sahal-Brchot, S. 1984, A&A, 131, 33 Lin, H., Penn, M.J. & Kuhn, J.R. 1998, ApJ 493, 978 Low, B.C. 1996, JGR 106, 25141 Low, B.C. 2001, Solar Phys. 167, 217 Low, B.C. 2006, ApJ 649, 1064 Low, B.C. & Hundhausen, J.R. 1995, ApJ 443, 81 Morozov, A.I. & Solov'ev, L.S. 1966, in Reviews of Plasma Physics, Vol. 2 (New York: Consultants Bureau), 1 Morse P.M. & Feshbach H. 1953, Methods of Theoretical Physics (2 Vols.). (New York: McGraw-Hill) Neukirch, T. 1999, The Theory of MHD Equilibria lecture series, U. of St. Andrews (URL: www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/ thomas/teaching/mhdlect.pdf) Parker, E.N. 1994, Spontaneous Current Sheets in Magnetic Fields (New York: Oxford Univ. Press) Pevtsov, A.A., Canfield, R.C., & Latushko, S. M. 2001, ApJ, 549, L261 Rust, D.M., and Kumar,A. 1996, ApJ 464, L199 Taylor, J.B. 1986, Rev. Mod. Physics 58, 741 Wood, B.E., Karovska, M., Chen, J., Brueckner, G.E., Cook, J.W., and Howard, R.A.: 1999, ApJ 512, 484 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
astro-ph/0012110	1	0012	2000-12-05T17:43:07	Optical Surface Photometry of a Sample of Disk Galaxies. II Structural Components	[ "astro-ph" ]	This work presents the structural decomposition of a sample of 11 disk galaxies, which span a range of different morphological types. The U, B, V, R, and I photometric information given in Paper I (color and color-index images and luminosity, ellipticity, and position-angle profiles) has been used to decide what types of components form the galaxies before carrying out the decomposition. We find and model such components as bulges, disks, bars, lenses and rings.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A&A manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) Your thesaurus codes are: 3 (11.19.2; 11.19.5; 11.19.7) ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS Optical Surface Photometry of a Sample of Disk Galaxies. II Structural Components M. Prieto1, J. A. L. Aguerri1,2,A. M. Varela1 & C. Munoz-Tun´on1 1.- Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 2.- Astronomisches Institut der Universitat Basel, CH-4102 Binningen, Switzerland Received ; accepted Abstract. This work presents the structural decomposi- tion of a sample of 11 disk galaxies, which span a range of different morphological types. The U , B, V , R, and I photometric information given in Paper I (color and color- index images and luminosity, ellipticity, and position-angle profiles) has been used to decide what types of components form the galaxies before carrying out the decomposition. We find and model such components as bulges, disks, bars, lenses and rings. Key words: Galaxies: optical photometry, galaxies: structure, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: spi- ral 1. Introduction The fit of structural models to the luminosity distribution of spiral galaxies is a complicated task. There are several difficulties, among which we emphasize the following: 1) The presence of components other the bulge and disk. Sometimes these structures are clearly present in the form of, for example, large bars or lenses and we can model them. Often times this is not possible particu- larly at short wavelengths where the spiral arms, star formation regions and the dust extinction can modify the aspect of the smooth light distribution due to the old population that contributes most of the mass. 2) Bulge models are not unique. All the light-profile func- tions proposed for ellipticals can be used for the bulges of spirals. In recent years the generalized exponential bulge (Sersic 1968; Sparks 1988) has been the most extensively used model and this law is intrinsicly vari- able. 3) Although exponential disks are well established, it is necessary to have photometric data at large radii in order to avoid contamination from other more central components (Prieto et al. 1992b). Most of the images of nearby galaxies do not reach the low brightness levels to achieve this. In general, the B/D relation has very little reliability due to these above-mentioned reasons and also because the bulge scale length is sometimes smaller than the seeing disk. Perhaps the most reliable decompositions are those for galaxies with a very well defined disk. This means, well sampled and free from other emission features. In recent decades much work has been done in or- der to improve the methods for ascertaining the principal (bulge and disk) components of disk galaxies from their optical photometric profiles. Kormendy (1977), Boroson's (1981), Shombert & Bothum (1987), Kent (1987), Capac- cioli, Held, & Nieto (1987), Andredakis & Sanders (1994), De Jong (1996), Moriondo, Giovanardi, & Hunt (1997). All these studies have resulted in gradual progress in this difficult task. The majority of the above-mentioned studies analyze the bulge and disk without considering the presence of other components. In this article we try to provide a fur- ther step in the unraveling of the complicated structures of spiral galaxies, by taking into account all other com- ponents which may be present in disk galaxies. This is done by using the multi-color photometric information ( Aguerri et al. (1999), here after Paper I), to determine what the different components are that comprise each galaxy before the decomposition is attempted. We do this for a limited sample of 11 galaxies. In paper I, we pre- sented the observations and data reduction for this sample of galaxies. 2. Model Fitting We use azimuthally averaged profiles to determine the various components. This preserves information on non- axisymmetics features, such as bars (m = 2), because isophotal ellipse fitting allows the ellipticity and the po- sition angle of the m = 2 structures to be fitted, as re- flected in the ellipticity and position angle profiles (Woz- niak et al. 1995; Prieto et al. 1997; Varela, Munoz-Tun´on, & Simmoneau 1996). However when the bar is very large and strong, we characterize the bulge and disk not by az- imuthally averaging but by individual profiles transverse to the projected bar. 2 M. Prieto et al: Structural components The profiles are built from ellipses of variable ellipticity and position angle. To consider this variation is a way to correct for warps or any large-scale disk or bulge deforma- tion. The small variations in the luminosity of the disk are thus averaged and the S/N increased considerably. Points in the profile affected by additional structures, like rings or tight spiral arms, can be easily be omitted. Moriondo et al. (1997) compared the 1D and 2D tech- niques and concluded that the 1D technique is always less accurate and sometimes inconsistent with 2D one and that the inferior quality of the 1-D fits is attested by both by the larger errors in the parameters and by the larger val- ues of χ2. They obtained profiles by keeping the position angle of the ellipses fixed, which introduces an error in the luminosity profile since isophotes are frequently twisted. Moreover, their 2D model considers the apparent bulge and disk ellipticity to be fixed, while in the 1D model, both parameters were allow to vary. We think that the result of these two analyses are not comparable. De Jong (1996) also compares the parameters of the bulge and disk fitted in the 1D and 2D decompositions in his Figure 6. The only model used for all the galaxies in their 1D fit is that of bulge+disk neglecting the obvious presence of bars in many of the galaxies of his sample; however, the bars are taken into account in his 2D fit. Again, these two analysis cannot be compared. 2.1. The components We assume that the luminosity distribution of a galaxy is the sum of the distributions of its individual compo- nents. We use the following laws for fitting the different components found in the galaxy sample: Bulges: We approximate the bulge luminosity profile to the r1/n law introduced by Sersic (1968): where Iod is the central surface brightness of the disk and h is the scale length of the disk. Bars: We find two types of bars. 1. Elliptical bars. These bars have elliptical isophotes and we have used the two-dimensional function given by Freeman (1966) for fitting the luminosity distribution, Ibar(x, y), of this type of bars: Ibar(x, y) = Io,barr1 − ( x abar )2 − ( y b bar )2 (5) where the free parameters are Io,bar, the bar central surface brightness, and abar and bbar, which are the scale lengths for the semi-major and semi-minor axes, respectively, of the bar. This equation is valid within the bar region (i.e. x ≤ abar, y ≤ bbar). In equation 5, the origin is the bar center, the x-axis is in the direction of the bar major axis and the y-axis is perpendicular to this. 2. Flat bars. For fitting this kind of profile we use the expression given in Prieto et al. (1997): Ibar(r) = Io,bar 1 + e r−α β , (6) where α and β are constants which smooth the end of the bar. Lenses: A lens is characterized by having a smooth lu- minosity gradient with a very sharp cut-off. Duval & Athanassoula (1983), studying the galaxy NGC 5383, found a lens in its luminosity profile and fitted it to the expression: Ibulge(r) = Ie10−bn(( r re )1/n−1), (1) Ilens(r) = Iol(1 − (r/rol)2), r ≤ rol (7) where Ibulge(r) is the surface brightness of the bulge in flux density at a distance r from the center, or, in surface magnitude units: µb(r) = µe + cn(( r re )1/n − 1), (2) with cn = 2.5bn, and where bn can be chosen in such a way that the scale-radius, re, is the radius encircling half of the total luminosity, LT, and Ie is the surface brightness at this radius. Disks: The disk luminosity profiles were fitted by an ex- ponential law, where the surface brightness for the disk in flux density, Idisk(r), is given by: where Iol is the surface brightness in flux density at the lens center , and rol is the typical size of the lens. We used this expression for fitting the lenses found in this sample. Rings: Rings and pseudo-rings are present in many spiral galaxies. The transverse luminosity profiles of these struc- tures are well fitted with Gaussian functions: Iring(r) = Iore− 1 2 ( r−ror σ )2 , (8) where Ior is the surface brightness in flux density at ror, which is the radius of the ring, and σ is the width of the ring. Idisk(r) = Iode−r/h. Or, in surface magnitude units, by, µd(r) = µo + 1.086 r h , (3) The total surface brightness model is the sum of all the above functions corresponding to the components that appear in the galaxy: (4) Itotal(r) = Ibulge(r)+Idisk(r)+Ibar(r)+Ilens(r)+Iring+...(9) M. Prieto et al: Structural components 3 2.2. The fitting technique The most important feature of the method is the detailed study of the multicolor photometric information for each of the galaxies, before performing the decomposition, to determine the different structural components which form the galaxies and make an estimate of their scale lengths. After the decomposition we consider whether the param- eters obtained are physically meaningful. For an accurate decomposition, the intrinsic peculiar- ities of each galaxy do not permit an automatic method. The non-linear χ2 minimization routine method to fit the model profiles to the data points is quicker than interac- tive methods, and perhaps more suitable when treating a more extensive sample of galaxies, but when we ana- lyze a small number of galaxies in detail, the automatic methods are not useful. For example, some points in the profiles of galaxies with a blue ring must be avoided and the model must pass below them. An automatic method cannot do this. Moreover the χ2 method is not useful for analyzing galaxies with complex structures. The param- eters obtained with this method are often not physically meaningful. The process begins by examining the color and color- index images, which give us a qualitative idea of what the components are. Next, we examine the color-index pro- files, where we can estimate the scale length of any addi- tional components. Then, the confirmation of the assumed components is obtained in the ellipticity and position- angle profiles, where the geometry of the different struc- tures projected onto the sky plane are well reflected. At this point we decide the set of structural components that make up the galaxy. Then we decompose the azimuthally averaged or individual (for galaxies with strong bars) lu- minosity profiles of the galaxy to obtain the parameters of their components. We use an interactive profile-fitting routine. The rou- tine begins by fitting the parameters for the disk and bulge over different ranges of the profile, defined by the linear trends of the surface brightness against r and r1/n, re- spectively, with the least-squares method in an iterative process. Beginning with the estimated initial values, we fit the other components (bars or lenses), by varying their parameters until a good fit is obtained. These were then subtracted from the original profile and the bulge and disk fitted again. This process is repeated until all parame- ters convergence. We define convergence to have occurred when the difference between the structural parameters of the bulge and disk for two consecutive steps is smaller than the fit errors of those parameters. For the galaxies, NGC 1300, NGC 7479, and NGC 7723, which have prominent bars, we used profiles along the major and minor axes of the bar instead of the azimuthal profile. On the minor-axis profile, (which is less affected by the bar component), corrected for incli- nation and position angle, we fit the bulge, disk, and other components using the method described above. The fitted bulge and disk functions are subtracted from the major- axis profile to characterize the bar in its long dimension. This process is repeated until all parameters convergence as described above. Some bars, such as NGC 7723, and NGC 1300, show very strong star formation regions at their ends, which were fitted with Gaussians. These re- gions are associated with the beginning of spiral arms. The features created in a profile due to spiral arm cross- ing it are also well fitted by Gaussian functions. 3. Structural decomposition of the galaxies All the photometric information needed to analyze the galaxies is given in Paper I. The figures in that paper should be viewed in conjunction with this section. The calibration constants in Paper I include the cor- rection due to galactic inclination and absorption; con- sequently all parameters are corrected for these effects. We have not corrected for internal extinction. According to Xilouris et al. (1999), a typical face-on spiral galaxy is transparent and is optically thick, at least in the cen- tral regions, down to inclination angles of almost 60◦. The galaxies in this sample are near to or below these limits. In Figs. 1 -- 11 we present the decomposition of the lu- minosity profiles in each filter and in Tables I-XI we show the parameters of the models as defined in Sec. 2.1: the fractional luminosity of each component, and the elliptic- ity and position angle of the disk and bar defined as the average value of the last points for the disk and the value at the typical length for the bar. The uncertainty given for the bulge and disk parame- ters comes from the "standard errors" of the coefficients of the lines of regression of the fits. These "standard errors" are a measure of the residuals between the observations and the fitted regression line. Clearly, these residuals de- pend strongly on the deformation of the profile due to structures which were not fitted, such as spiral arms, star formations regions, etc... The fit for bar and lens parameters was achieved by varying by a fixed amount the parameters of their lumi- nosity laws around the estimated values. This number is the uncertainty in the parameters of the bars and lenses given in Tables 1 -- 11. Next, we describe the decomposition procedure for each galaxy. The morphological classification given is that of de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991). NGC 1300. This is an SB(rs)bc galaxy. In the color and color-index images and profiles (Fig.1a, and 2a, Paper I), we can distinguish a prominent bar of about 70′′ (on the major axis), a very blue region at the center, two dust lanes along the bar, curved around the center, which could be related to the presence of an ILR (Athanossoula 1992a,b). Two prominent blue spiral arms, and a uniform color region inside 50′′ which suggests the presence of a lens. The bar region has the same color as the disk, sug- 4 M. Prieto et al: Structural components gesting that the stars of the bar are of the same type as those in the surroundings. The galaxy seems to have the following components: a bulge, a disk, a bar, and a lens. The ellipticity profile (Fig. 2a, Paper I) confirms the pres- ence of these components. In Fig. 1 we present the pro- files perpendicular and parallel to the bar with the various components fitted. The bulge is fitted with an index n=4 in all filters, but not inside 10′′ in the perpendicular bar profile, probably due to the strong extinction in this re- gion. The bar is very well fitted by an elliptical function. The model for the parallel profiles inside 30′′ does not fit the observations well, due to the two dust-lanes parallel to the bar. At the end of the bar there are star forma- tion regions, which are well fitted by a Gaussian function. However, in the parallel profile at 150′′ there is a hump in the luminosity due to a spiral arm which is not well fitted by a Gaussian, due the presence in this direction of a very narrow peak, probably caused by a giant star formation region. The hump in the perpendicular profiles around 120′′ is a spiral arm which is well fitted by a Gaus- sian profile. In this galaxy, the errors of the scale lengths of the disk are so large that no conclusions can be drawn concerning the relative values of the parameters of the different components or the bulge-to-disk (B/D) ratio. NGC 5992. The morphological type of this galaxy is not clear; it is classified as simply S-type by de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991) and as Markarian 489 by Mazzarella & Balzano (1986). It presents an active starburst nucleus (Balzano 1983; Bicay et al. 1995). In the B−I color-index image (Fig. 1b, Paper I) some structure appears inside 10′′, a red region to the NE from the center, and a blue one to the E. In the ellipticity profile (Fig. 2b, Paper I) we observe a feature indicating a bar with a length of about 20′′. We fit a luminosity profile for the bulge with an index of 1.5 in all filters, an exponential disk, and a flat bar. The observational feature appearing above the model at about 6.5′′ is probably due to the structure within 10′′. The B/D ratio is high, which suggests that it is an early- type spiral with structural deformations probably due to an interaction with NGC 5993. In Fig. 2 we present the fit of the all these parameters to the surface-brightness profiles of the galaxies. NGC 6056: This is a lenticular barred galaxy, classified as SB(s)0. In the color-index map (Fig. 1c, Paper I) we observe a structure of constant color, which probably cor- responds to a lens ending at about 20′′. The ellipticity and position-angle profiles reveal the presence of a bar about 8′′ in length. The lens is very faint in the optical profiles, but is prominent in the infrared filters, as we will show in a future paper. The bar is flat and has a misalignment of about 10◦ with respect to the line of nodes of the disk (see Fig. 2c, Paper I). We obtained a very good fit with a flat bar feature. The re of the bulge increases, and the scale length of the disk decreases, with redder filters. The scale length of the bar in I is smaller than in the other filters. NGC 6661. This is a lenticular galaxy, classified as SA(s)0/a. The color-index images and profiles (Figs. 1d, and 2d, Paper I) present a constant-color region from about 10′′ to 30′′, which suggests the presence of a lens. A red ring appears at about 30′′ in the color-index profiles and B−I image. We need to add an elliptical lens to the bulge and disk functions for a good fit to the luminosity profiles in all filters (Fig. 4). The bulge is fitted with an index of about 2 in all filters, the disk is smaller in redder filters, and the scale length of the lens is smaller in I than in the other filters. is a late-type spiral classified as NGC 6946. This SAB(rs)cd, with an active nucleus, type HII (Keel 1984; Engelbracht et al. 1996). In the B and U filters it was not possible to fit ellipses to the isophotes due to the presence of strong spiral arms and many high luminosity regions, probably star formation regions. The color and color-index images (Fig. 1e, and 2e, Paper I) show an extensive cen- tral region of constant color, suggesting the presence of a lens. In the color index profile, we can estimate the length scale of this component, about 70′′, and this can be con- firmed in the ellipticity profiles where there is a change in the ellipticity at just about this distance. The misalign- ment between the inner and the outer isophotes seen in the position-angle profiles (Fig. 2e, Paper I) may indicate the presence of a triaxial bulge. The fluctuations of the observations about the disk model (Fig. 6) are due to the presence of spiral arms; there is a very blue arm at about 20′′, which causes the model to fall below the observations in the bluer filters. The bulge fits an r1/4 law, including in the central part, and its rel- ative luminosity increases toward the redder filters. The scale length and relative luminosity of the disk decreases greatly with the redder filters. This galaxy presents the smallest B/D ratio of the sample. NGC 7013. This is another lenticular galaxy, classified as SA(r)0/a. Optical and Hα images (Lynds 1974) show a small bulge, and an inner ring. The H i distribution is in two rings (Eskridge & Pogge 1991; Knapp et al. 1984). The larger ring is situated just inside the edge of the opti- cal disk, and the smaller one is associated with the inner stellar ring. In the color-index images and profiles (Figs. 1g, and 2g, Paper I) we observe a blue ring feature cen- tered at about 25′′, and a constant-color region from 10′′ to 60′′, suggesting the presence of a lens. In the ellipticity profile we can confirm these components. At about 25′′ the isophotes have an ellipticity close to 0.65 corresponding to the position of the ring; this is similar to that of the outer disk. After this, there are a plateau until about 60′′, which corresponds to the lens. This lens probably has a non-zero intrinsic ellipticity because it is considerably smaller than that of the outer disk, and its position angles are quite different. Beyond this, the ellipticity and position angle of the ellipses are due to the inclination of the galactic disk. We have modeled the observed luminosity profiles of this galaxy with four components (Fig. 6): a bulge, a disk, a M. Prieto et al: Structural components 5 lens, and a ring. The value of the index n for the bulge de- pends on the filter, and is about 1.5. The scale length for the disk and lens is smaller in I than in the other filters. NGC 7217. This galaxy is classified as (R)SA(r)ab. It is a LINER (Ho, Filippenko, & Sargent 1993; Hummel et al. 1987). In the B−I and B−V color map and profiles (Figs. 1g, and 2g, Paper I) we can see the ring structures, with three nuclear rings (red, blue and another red) at about 8′′, 10′′ and 15′′, a blue inner ring, and a blue outer ring at about 30′′, and 75′′, respectively, measured in the B−I image. The ellipticity and PA profiles indicate that the rings are quite circular, and that their isophotes have similar position angles to those of the disk. Buta et al. (1995) and Verdes-Montenegro, Bosma, & Athanassoula (1995) studied the ring structures of this galaxy and their locations are in agreement with our values. The bulge is fitted with an r1/2 law in all filters. In addition to the bulge and disk in the B and V filters, we have fitted the blue nuclear ring, and the blue inner and outer rings; in the R and I filters we have also fitted the red innermost ring and the blue outer ring. All rings are fitted with Gaussian functions. In Table 7, we give the positions of the rings in the different filters from the model fit, as shown in Figure 7. NGC 7479. This is a barred galaxy, cataloged as SB(s)bc; it is classified as a LINER type by Keel (1983a,b) and Devereux (1989), and as HII (Hummel et al. 1987). This galaxy has been studied by many authors. Dynamic stud- ies by Laine (1996) reveal the presence of an interaction with another galaxy, which could explain the asymmetry of the arms. It presents large, bright H ii regions along the bar (Hua, Donas, & Duun 1980). The central blue peak that appears in the B−I color-index profile is probably due to nuclear activity. This galaxy shows a prominent asymmetric bar, and strong spiral arms in the color and color-index images (Figs. 1h, and 2h, Paper I). In the bar region there are strong dust lanes, which present an asym- metric distribution. The color of the bar and bulge is red- der than that of the disk. The ellipticity and position angle profiles (Fig. 2h, Paper I) have the features of a strong bar about 100′′ in semi-length, its position angle being about 100◦, different from that of the disk. The presence of a triaxial bulge is suggested by the misalignment between the inner and outer isophotes. The bar is fitted with a flat function along the both axes (Fig. 8). In these profiles, it is possible to see two spiral-arm features, at around 40′′ and 100′′. This inner spiral arm is very smooth in the I band (it is almost invisible) but is clearly present in the V band. Elmegreen & Elmegreen (1985), studying the bar -- interbar intensities, also found that this bar has a flat light profile. The fit is better in the I band than in R and V , due the I profile is less affected by the star formation re- gions present along the bar's major axis (Hummel et al. 1987). The bulge profile fits an exponential function well. As in NGC 1300, the large error in the scale length of the disk prevents us from reaching any conclusions concerning the trend of the parameters with the filters. NGC 7606. This galaxy is cataloged as SA(s)b with a LINER-type nucleus (Keel 1983b). The color and color- index images (Figs. 1i, and 2i, Paper I) show a red nucleus, a constant-color region inside 20′′, and beyond this there are very prominent spiral arms. In the B−I map there are three red pseudo-rings, probably due to the inter regions. The ellipticity and position-angle profiles (Figs. 1i, and 2i, Paper I) confirm these structures; inside 20′′ the bulge geometry dominates. From here out to about 60′′ a dif- ferent structure appears, due to the arms and rings, and beyond this distance the ellipticity and position angle are constant due the inclination of the disk. The bulge+disk model provides a good fit to the observations, including the central part of the bulge, with an index n of around 2 for all filters. Andredakis & Sanders (1994) also found an exponential bulge (Fig. 9). The early type of this galaxy, together with its high inclination, cause the strong spiral arms to look like rings; they are prominent in the isophotal luminosity profiles above the bulge-plus-disk model. NGC 7723. This is an SB(r)b galaxy with HII-type nu- clear activity (Keel 1983b; Hummel et al. 1987; Giurcin et al. 1994). In the color and color-index maps and pro- files (Figs. 1j, and 2j, Paper I) there is clear evidence for a bar of semi-length about 30′′ and a pseudo-ring at the end of the bar. The bar is redder than the disk and shows two straight dust-lanes emanating from the nucleus. The structure of these dust-lanes, which are not curved inward toward the center, suggests that there is no ILR in this galaxy (Athanassoula 1992a,b). The central pixels of this galaxy are saturated and the results are not significant inside the central 5′′. The color index of the disk is quite constant with radius. In the ellipticity and position-angle profiles (Fig. 2j, Paper I) the bar and pseudo-ring are clearly present, with different position angles from that of the disk. The bar is well fit by an elliptical bar function, and the pseudo-ring by a Gaussian function. The hump that appears in the perpendicular profiles around 30′′ cor- responds to the pseudo-ring. This galaxy has smooth and very broad spiral arms, which correspond to the region (from 50′′ to 90′′), where the model does not fit the ob- served profiles. The bulge is fitted with an index n=1 ( exponential law). The re for the bulge and the h for the disk are constant in all the bands. NGC 7753. It is in interaction with another galaxy (Salo & Laurikainen 1993) and is classified as SAB(rs)bc. In the color and color-index maps (Figs. 1k, and 2k, Paper I) a small (about 10′′ long) bar is evident. The existence of such structure is also indicated by the ellipticity and position-angle profiles (Fig. 2k, Paper I). The luminosity profiles were modeled with a bulge, a disk, and an ellip- tical bar (Fig. 11). At around 40′′ there is an increase in luminosity above the model which is due to a spiral arm. The bulge was fitted with an r1/2 law. 6 4. Discussion M. Prieto et al: Structural components To analyze the results of the structural decomposition of this sample of galaxies, we divide these in three groups: those with a well defined disk, those with an ill-defined disk and those with strong bars and well developed arms. 1.- Galaxies with a well defined disk. These galaxies have an extensive part of their disk free from contamination by other components, which implies that the fitted bulge and disk parameters are reliable, and that we can make comparisons between them. Our criterion for selecting these galaxies is that they have at least 1/3 of their luminosity profile coming from the disk without overlapping other components. Only four galax- ies obey this condition: NGC 6056, NGC 6661, NGC 6946, and NGC 7606 (NGC 6661 fault this condition in the I band. The following interpretations, although of an outstand- ingly coherent behavior, are made with caution due the small number of galaxies and the reduced statistical sig- nificance. In Fig. 12 we present the shape index, n, versus the filter. There is a trend where n increases with the redder filters. This can be interpreted as the older population be- ing more extended than the younger, which could indicate an end of the star formation in the bulge from outside to inside. Extinction would have the reverse trend. The ab- solute variation of n with filter is ±0.3 around the mean value. The n index is bigger for the Sb galaxy than for the Scd one. We are not going to compare this index between spirals and lenticulars. These galaxies are of different morphological types (SO, SO/a, Sb, and Sc). Their inclinations are the largest of the sample, near the transparent limits (60◦), (Xilouris et al. (1999)), so we expect to find some effect of the inter- nal extinction on the scale length of the disk, h, depending on the filter. In Fig. 13 we see how h varies with the filter for each galaxy. The scale length of the disk decreases in all galaxies when the filter is redder, as we would expect an optical thickness increasing towards the center of the galaxy. However, we can not exclude an additional effect due to stellar population. The effective radii of the bulges do not present any systematic trend with the filter. The ratio of the scale length of the disk to the effec- tive radius of the bulge, Fig. 14, presents a systematic decrease to the red. We also find a systematic increase of re/h from late to early type galaxies, contrary to that found by Courteau, de Jong, & Broeils (1996) and de Jong (1996). This problem have been rigorously treated in Gra- ham & Prieto (1999). 2.- Galaxies with an ill-defined disk. Although in these galaxies the disk is not well defined, we have carried out the structural decomposition in order to determine which components are present and we have obtained an estimate of their scale lengths. Fig 12. The index n of the bulge model vs filter for those galaxies with well defined disk and variable index. Fig 13. Scale length of the disk against filter for those galaxies with well defined disk. NGC 7013. This galaxy has a blue outer ring, seen clearly in the B−V and B−I images and in the luminosity profiles. This ring hinders the clear detection of the disk and this has been fitted to the external edges of the ring. The galaxy has an inclination close to the transparency M. Prieto et al: Structural components 7 limit and there is a trend toward decreasing h in redder filters. We can conclude that this galaxy has a ring at 20′′, a lens of scale length is 50′′, and a bulge shape index of 1.5. NGC 7217. This galaxy has multiple blue and red rings which hinder clear detection of the disk. We have fitted the disk to the zone we consider to be between rings, but these rings are very wide and numerous except for the I filter where they are smoother. NGC 5992. This galaxy is probably interacting with NGC 5993. Except in the B filter, there is too little data for the outer disk to make a good estimate of the disk pa- rameters. We have fitted the disk to the outermost points of the galaxy, outside the bar region. We can conclude that this galaxy has a flat bar with scale length is 19′′. NGC 7753. This galaxy has very strong spiral arms. We have carry out the fit of the disk in the inter-arm regions. Fig 14. The ratio h/re vs the filter for those galaxies with well defined disk. 3.- Galaxies with large bars and well defined spiral arms. These galaxies are, NGC 1300, NGC 7479, and NGC 7723. None of these galaxies have a well observed region of the disk due to the presence of powerful spiral arms. We have fitted the disk in individual profiles and on the existing points between the arms. There is no clear zone of disk in any of these galaxies. However, we have achieved the fittings to know the general features of the other components. NGC 1300. This galaxy has a bar, a lens, prominent spiral arms and star formation regions. NGC 7479 and NGC 7723. These galaxies have very few points to fit the disk. They have an elliptical bar with scale length of 51′′ and scale wide 25′′ in NGC 7479 and scale length of 22′′ and scale wide of 12′′ for NGC 7723. The bulges of the spiral galaxies in this sample, with the exception of NGC 1300, have an n index which follows the general trend observed in spiral galaxies. The earliest, NGC 7217 (Sab), has an index n = 2.8, and the rest have values between 1 and 2. We did not find Freeman type II profiles in this sample of 11 galaxies probably because we considered components other than the bulge and disk. We found bars in half of the galaxies analyzed. Half of these bars have the same color as the underlying struc- ture (NGC 1300, NGC 6056, and NGC 5992), and the other half are redder than such structure (NGC 7479, NGC 7723, and NGC 7753). The cause of this segrega- tion is a question still to be understood. This could give us some indication of the state of the bar; the red bars are probably the oldest, and the young bars retain the color of the disk stars which give them their form. 5. Summary and Conclusions We have performed a structural decomposition for a sam- ple of 11 disk galaxies of different morphological types. The bulges were fitted with an r1/n law, the disks with an exponential law, the bars with elliptical or flat functions, rings and spiral arms with Gaussian functions, and the lenses with a quadratic expression. Prior to the fit, we used the U , B, V , R, and I photometric data (color and color- index images and luminosity, ellipticity, and position-angle profiles) to decide the type and number of different compo- nents which form the galaxies and to estimate their scale lengths. We have written an interactive profile-fitting rou- tine for the decomposition, which fits the parameters of the models in an iterative process. We find and model all components which form the galaxies: bulge, disk, bar, lens, ring, etc. Only for galaxies with well defined disks do we give reliable parameters for the bulge and disk. For the galaxies with well defined disks we find that : -- The scale length of the disk decreases when the filter is redder, as would be expected for an optical thickness increasing towards the center of the galaxy. -- There is a increased trend in the index n of the bulge with the redder filters. This can be interpreted as the older population being more extended than the younger. -- The ratio between the scale length of the disk and the effective radius of the bulge, shows a systematic decrease to the red. We also find a systematic increase in this ratio from late to early types of galaxies. For the galaxies with ill-defined disk we have given the position and length-scales of components other than the bulge and disk. 8 M. Prieto et al: Structural components We do not find Freeman type II profiles in this sample of galaxies, probably because we considered components other than the bulge and disk. We found bars in half of the galaxies analyzed, which are either elliptical or flat. Half of these bars have the same color as the underlying structure (NGC 1300, NGC 6056, and NGC 5992), and the other half have redder colors (NGC 7479, NGC 7723, and NGC 7753). We are most sincerely grateful to Alister Graham for useful conversations and kindly reading and improving the manuscript. We express our thanks to Terry Mahoney for correcting the English of the manuscript. The 2.5-m INT is operated on the island of La Palma by the Royal Green- wich Observatory at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de Los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Ca- narias. Support for this work comes from project PB97- 1107 and PB97-0219 of the Spanish DGES. The observa- tions received financial support from the European Com- mission through the Access to Large-Scale Facilities Ac- tivity of the Human Capital and Mobility Programme. References Kormendy, J. 1977, ApJ, 214, 359 Laine, S. J. 1996, PhD Thesis, Florida University Lynds, B. T. 1974, ApJS, 28, 391 Mazzarella, J. M., & Balzano, V. A. 1986, ApJS, 62, 751 Moriondo, G., Giovanardi, C., & Hunt L.K., 1997, A&AS, 130, 81 Prieto, M., Beckman, J. E., Cepa, J., & Varela, A. M. 1992b, A&A, 257, 85 Prieto, M., Gottesman, S. T., Aguerri, J. A. L., & Varela, A. M. 1997, AJ, 114, 1413 Prieto, M., Longley, D. P. T., P´erez, E., Beckman, J. E., Varela, A. M., & Cepa, J. 1992a, A&AS, 93, 557 Salo, H., & Laurikainen, E. 1993, ApJ, 410, 586 Schombert, J.M., & Bothun, G.D., 1987, AJ, 92, 1, 60 Sersic, J. L. 1968, Atlas de galaxias australes (C´ordoba: Ob- servatorio Astron´onico) Sersic, J..L., 1982, Extragalactic Astronomy. Reidel, Dor- drecht. Spark, W.B., 1988, AJ, 1569 NASA ADS de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H. G., & Buta, R. 1991, Third Reference Catalog of Bright Galaxies (New York: Springer) (RC3) de Vaucouleurs, G. 1958, Ann, d'Astrophys, 11, 247 Varela A.M., Munoz-Tun´on, C. & Simmoneau E., 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 381. Aguerri, J. A. L., Varela, A. M., Prieto, M. & Munoz-Tun´on, Verdes-Montengro, L., Bosma, A., & Athanassoula, E. 1995, A&A, 300, 65 Wozniak, H., Friedli, D., Martinet, L., Martin, P., & Bratschi, P. 1995, A&AS, 111, 115 Xilouris, E.M., Byun, Y.I., Kilafis, N.D., Paleologon, E.U., & Papamastorakis, J., 1999 (in press). C. 1999, AJ, 119, 1638. Andredakis, Y. C., & Sanders, R. M. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 283 Athanassoula, E. 1992a, MNRAS, 259, 328 Athanassoula, E. 1992b, MNRAS, 259, 345 Balzano, V. A. 1983, ApJ, 268, 602 Bicay, M. D., Kojoian, G., Seal, J., Dickinson, D. F., & Malkan, H. A. 1995, ApJS, 98, 369 Boroson, T. 1981, Ap.JS, 46, 177 Buta, R., van Driel, W., Braine, J., Combes, F., Wakamatsu, K., Sofue, Y., & Tomita, A. 1995, ApJ, 450, 593 Capaccioli, M., Held, E.V., & Nieto J. -- L.,1987, AJ, 94,1519 Courteau, S., de Jong, R.S., Broeils. A.H. 1996, ApJ, 457, L73 Devereux, N. A. 1989, ApJ, 346, 126 Duval, M. F., & Athanassoula, E. 1983, A&A, 121, 297 Elmegreen, B. G., & Elmegreen, D. M. 1985, ApJ, 288, 438 Elmegreen, B. G., Elmegreen, D. M., Chromey, F. R., Hassel- bacher, D. A., & Bisseli, B. A. 1996, AJ, 111, 2233 Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, M. J., Rieke, G. M., & Latter, W. B. 1996, ApJ, 467, 227 Eskridge, P. B., & Pogge, R. W. 1991, AJ, 101, 2056 Freeman, K. C. 1966, MNRAS, 133, 47 Giurcin, G., Tamburini, L., Mardirossian, F., Mezzetti, H., & Monaco, P. 1994, ApJ, 427, 202 Graham, A., & Prieto, M., 1999, ApJ, 524, 23L Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1993, ApJ, 417, 63 Hummel, E., van der Hulst, J. M., Keel, W. C., & Kennicutt, R. C. 1987, A&AS, 70, 517 Hua, C. T., Donas, J., & Duun, H. H. 1980, A&A, 90, 8 de Jong, R.S., 1996, A&AS, 118, 557 Keel, W. C. 1983a, ApJ, 269, 466 Keel, W. C. 1983b, ApJ, 268, 632 Keel, W. C. 1984, ApJ, 282, 75 Kent, S. M. 1987, AJ, 93, 816 Knapp, G. R., van Driel, W., Schwarz, V. J., van Woerden, H., & Gallager, J. S. 1984, A&A, 133, 127 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 9 Table 1. Structural parameters of NGC 1300. Ellipticity 0.39 ± 0.11 Structure Bulge Parameters re(") µe (mag/arcsec2) n % LBulge/LT otal Disk h(") µ0(mag/arcsec2) Bar Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal B/D Major axis (Type) µ0(mag/arcsec2) a(") Minor axis (Type) b(") Position angle Ellipticity (b/a) % LBar/LT otal rol Position angle % LLens/LT otal B R 2.86 ± 0.17 18.45 ± 0.16 5.58 ± 0.15 18.5 ± 0.1 4.0 30 ± 1 58 ± 21 23 ± 0.8 96 ± 10 52 ± 30 0.5 ± 0.1 Elliptical 4.0 29 ± 1 70 ± 10 21.9 ± 0.5 0.45 ± 0.07 97 ± 7 55 ± 20 0.5 ± 0.1 Elliptical 95 ± 1 Elliptical 32.4 ± 0.5 100 ± 4 87 ± 1 Elliptical 43.2 ± 0.5 101 ± 2 0.34 ± 0.01 0.49 ± 0.01 9 ± 3 7.4 ± 0.2 64.8 ± 0.5 100 ± 4 78.3 ± 0.5 100 ± 4 I 3.9 ± 0.3 17.2 ± 0.2 4.0 19 ± 1 101 ± 25 21.5 ± 0.8 0.42 ± 0.08 94 ± 8 68 ± 29 0.3 ± 0.1 Elliptical 85 ± 1 Elliptical 416 ± 0.5 101 ± 2 0.43 ± 0.01 7.67 ± 0.05 21.83 ± 0.03 67.5 ± 0.5 100 ± 3 23.61 ± 0.07 22.61 ± 0.03 21.52 ± 0.02 Lens µl0(mag/arcsec2) 23.75 ± 0.07 22.75 ± 0.03 8.15 ± 0.03 7.97 ± 0.14 5.58 ± 0.05 Table 2. Structural parameters of NGC 5992. Structure Parameters B V R I Bulge re(") µe (mag/arsec2) n %LBulge/LT otal Disk h(") Bar µ0(mag/arsec2) Ellipticity Position Angle %LDisk/LT otal B/D Type µ0(mag/arsec2) α(") β(") Position Angle 4.24 ± 0.06 20.27 ± 0.02 3.65 ± 0.08 19.78 ± 0.03 3.85 ± 0.05 19.28 ± 0.02 3.91 ± 0.09 19.14 ± 0.02 1.5 41.2 ± 0.6 8.63 ± 0.27 20.75 ± 0.27 0.22 ± 0.12 26 ± 18 47.98 ± 0.34 0.85 ± 0.05 Flat 23.3 ± 0.1 19.44 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 89 ± 3 1.5 36 ± 5 8.18 ± 0.14 20.3 ± 0.1 0.23 ± 0.15 26 ± 23 51 ± 4 0.75 ± 0.06 Flat 22.8 ± 0.1 18.9 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 93 ± 3 1.5 45.6 ± 0.6 8.85 ± 0.25 20.26 ± 0.07 0.21 ± 0.12 39 ± 18 42.8 ± 0.6 1.06 ± 0.01 Flat 22.5 ± 0.1 18.9 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 93 ± 3 1.5 47 ± 2 11.15 ± 0.04 20.76 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.15 36 ± 35 38 ± 2 1.25 ± 0.07 Flat 22.1 ± 0.1 18.9 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 93 ± 3 Ellipticity 0.49 ± 0.04 0.51 ± 0.04 0.50 ± 0.03 0.51 ± 0.04 %LBar/LT otal 11 ± 5 13 ± 6 12 ± 6 15 ± 6 10 M. Prieto et al: Structural components Table 3. Structural parameters of NGC 6056. Structure Parameters B V R I Bulge re(") µe (mag/arcsec2) n % LBulge/LT otal Disk h(") µ0(mag/arcsec2) Ellipticity Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal B/D Type Bar 1.94 ± 0.02 21.65 ± 0.02 2.1 ± 0.2 20.74 ± 0.02 2.06 ± 0.07 20.15 ± 0.02 2.22 ± 0.13 19.70 ± 0.06 1.0 7.54 ± 0.02 7.57 ± 0.07 21.29 ± 0.02 0.45 ± 0.06 53 ± 5 83.8 ± 0.4 0.10 ± 0.01 1.1 9 ± 2 7.30 ± 0.12 20.34 ± 0.06 0.47 ± 0.03 53 ± 6 83 ± 3 1.1 9.7 ± 0.5 7.02 ± 0.05 19.67 ± 0.07 0.44 ± 0.06 53 ± 6 88 ± 8 1.3 9.10 ± 0.06 6.89 ± 0.15 18.93 ± 0.08 0.42 ± 0.16 54 ± 15 84 ± 5 0.11 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01 Flat Flat Flat Flat µ0(mag/arcsec2) 23.17 ± 0.03 22.53 ± 0.02 21.92 ± 0.02 21.09 ± 0.02 α(") β(") Position Angle Ellipticity % LBar/LT otal 8.6 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 65 ± 1 0.48 ± 0.01 8.62 ± 0.06 9.2 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 67.7 ± 0.5 0.52 ± 0.01 8.12 ± 0.08 8.6 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 67.5 ± 0.5 0.51 ± 0.01 7.45 ± 0.03 8.1 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 65.4 ± 0.7 0.51 ± 0.01 7.40 ± 0.03 Structure Parameters B V R I Table 4. Structural parameters of NGC 6661. Bulge re(") µe (mag/arsec2) n % LBulge/LT otal Disk h(") µ0(mag/arsec2) Ellipticity Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal B/D Lens µl0(mag/arsec2) 7.51 ± 0.07 21.13 ± 0.21 7.52 ± 0.09 20.15 ± 0.01 7.56 ± 0.07 19.67 ± 0.01 7.54 ± 0.03 19.40 ± 0.01 1.7 2.0 2.1 27.8 ± 0.5 35.8 ± 0.4 32.8 ± 0.2 1.7 17 ± 3 42 ± 2 21.81 ± 0.06 0.46 ± 0.12 60 ± 10 76 ± 6 28 ± 1 21.0 ± 0.1 0.34 ± 0.14 56 ± 14 63 ± 1 0.22 ± 0.05 21.62 ± 0.04 0.44 ± 0.01 21.33 ± 0.02 rol Position Angle % LLens/LT otal 23.7 ± 0.5 53 ± 6 7.1 ± 0.1 24.3 ± 0.5 46 ± 9 8.9 ± 0.1 28 ± 1 21.0 ± 0.1 0.30 ± 0.14 53 ± 16 56 ± 2 0.64 ± 0.01 21.21 ± 0.04 23.2 ± 0.5 49 ± 3 19 ± 1 19.62 ± 0.14 0.3 ± 0.1 51 ± 12 64 ± 6 0.51 ± 0.01 21.14 ± 0.05 17.8 ± 0.5 47 ± 2 7.91 ± 0.03 3.58 ± 0.01 Table 5. Structural parameters of NGC 6946. Structure Parameters Bulge re(") µe (mag/arcsec2) V R I 3.73 ± 0.01 17.81 ± 0.07 3.62 ± 0.02 17.32 ± 0.04 3.5 ± 0.1 16.78 ± 0.05 n 1.0 1.0 % LBulge/LT otal 0.61 ± 0.03 0.71 ± 0.12 Disk h(") µ0(mag/arcsec2) Ellipticity Position angle % LDisk/LT otal 174 ± 21 19.94 ± 0.06 0.67 ± 0.11 101 ± 7 98 ± 1 114 ± 7 19.29 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.06 119 ± 5 98 ± 1 1.0 3 ± 2 68 ± 2 18.73 ± 0.03 0.58 ± 0.11 131 ± 8 95 ± 2 B/D 0.006 ± 0.002 0.011 ± 0.001 0.030 ± 0.001 Lens µl0(mag/arcsec2) rol Position angle % LLens/LT otal 19.8 ± 0.1 27.5 ± 0.5 110 ± 4 19.6 ± 0.1 27.5 ± 0.5 109 ± 4 0.67 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.03 19.3 ± 0.1 27.5 ± 0.5 109 ± 3 2.2 ± 0.4 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 11 Table 6. Structural parameters of NGC 7013. Structure Parameters B V R I Bulge re(") µe (mag/arcsec2) 7.37 ± 0.15 20.14 ± 0.02 7.56 ± 0.13 19.10 ± 0.03 7.74 ± 0.1 19.10 ± 0.01 6.41 ± 0.10 18.40 ± 0.04 n 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5 % LBulge/LT otal 12.6 ± 0.8 25.88 ± 0.25 23.53 ± 0.16 19.42 ± 0.14 Disk h(") µ0(mag/arcsec2) Ellipticity Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal B/D Ring Ior(mag/arcsec2) ror(") σr(") Ellipticity Position Angle % LRing/LT otal µl0(mag/arcsec2) rol Position Angle % LLens/LT otal Lens 75 ± 9 22.3 ± 0.1 0.67 ± 0.05 62 ± 5 83 ± 2 0.15 ± 0.03 21.3 ± 0.1 21.6 ± 0.5 8.1 ± 0.5 0.48 ± 0.09 78 ± 7 0.83 ± 0.13 23.4 ± 0.1 54 ± 1 71 ± 3 50 ± 5 21.3 ± 0.1 0.65 ± 0.08 63 ± 5 65 ± 1 0.29 ± 0.05 21.3 ± 0.1 21.1 ± 0.5 6.5 ± 0.5 0.44 ± 0.11 80 ± 8 0.52 ± 0.05 22.1 ± 0.1 51.3 ± 0.5 71 ± 3 55 ± 4 21.3 ± 0.1 0.68 ± 0.05 64 ± 4 66.5 ± 0.7 0.34 ± 0.024 20.9 ± 0.1 20.5 ± 0.5 6.2 ± 0.5 0.56 ± 0.14 76 ± 12 0.72 ± 0.04 21.9 ± 0.1 54 ± 1 71 ± 6 45 ± 3 20.40 ± 0.14 0.67 ± 0.11 65 ± 6 66.6 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.1 20.9 ± 0.1 20.5 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 0.5 0.5 ± 0.1 82 ± 9 0.33 ± 0.02 20.7 ± 0.1 48.6 ± 0.5 74 ± 2 3.97 ± 0.02 8.23 ± 0.06 9.22 ± 0.01 14.67 ± 0.01 12 M. Prieto et al: Structural components Table 7. Structural parameters of NGC 7217. Structure Bulge Disk Parameters re(") µe (mag/arcsec2) n % LBulge/LT otal h(") µ0(mag/arcsec2) Ellipticity Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal B/D Blue nuclear ring Ior(mag/arcsec2) ror(") σr(") B V R I 11.21 ± 0.19 20.70 ± 0.04 10.72 ± 0.22 20.03 ± 0.02 6.96 ± 0.08 18.82 ± 0.03 6.75 ± 0.10 18.21 ± 0.02 2.5 21.30 ± 0.23 26.9 ± 0.7 20.04 ± 0.08 0.09 ± 0.20 91 ± 8 78.1 ± 0.9 0.26 ± 0.01 22.08 ± 0.05 10.8 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.5 2.8 22.78 ± 0.58 26.68 ± 0.17 19.48 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.05 92 ± 12 76.6 ± 0.9 0.29 ± 0.01 21.13 ± 0.02 10.8 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.5 2.5 15.11 ± 0.05 24.26 ± 0.21 18.51 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.09 92 ± 29 2.5 15.57 ± 0.21 22.9 ± 0.7 17.88 ± 0.06 0.09 ± 0.23 92 ± 57 84.58 ± 0.17 0.18 ± 0.01 84.11 ± 0.48 0.18 ± 0.01 Ellipticity Position Angle 0.91 ± 0.03 0.91 ± 0.02 73 ± 11 78 ± 9 % LN uclear ring/LT otal 0.07 ± 0.01 0.1 ± 0.06 Red nuclear ring Ior(mag/arcsec2) ror(") σr(") Ellipticity Position Angle Inner ring % LN uclear ring/LT otal Ior(mag/arcsec2) Outer ring ror(") σr(") Ellipticity Position Angle % LInner ring/LT otal Ior(mag/arcsec2) ror(") σr(") Ellipticity Position Angle 23.1 ± 0.1 31.3 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.5 22.35 ± 0.07 30.2 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 0.5 0.83 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.03 83 ± 7 0.08 ± 0.02 23.4 ± 0.2 75.6 ± 0.5 8.1 ± 0.5 0.85 ± 0.09 73 ± 20 83 ± 8 0.18 ± 0.08 23.6 ± 0.2 75.6 ± 0.5 10.8 ± 0.5 0.90 ± 0.05 83 ± 15 20.33 ± 0.05 19.44 ± 0.05 8.1 ± 0.5 2 ± 1 8.1 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.5 0.97 ± 0.03 0.92 ± 0.02 75 ± 25 74 ± 7 0.06 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.02 23.0 ± 0.1 75.1 ± 0.5 9.72 ± 0.5 0.89 ± 0.13 89 ± 21 22.9 ± 0.1 75.6 ± 0.5 10.8 ± 0.5 0.94 ± 0.06 69 ± 27 % LOuter ring/LT otal 0.44 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.05 0.24 ± 0.06 0.18 ± 0.09 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 13 Table 8. Structural parameters of NGC 7479. Structure Bulge Parameters re(") µe (mag/arcsec2) V R I 7.22 ± 0.09 20.45 ± 0.19 5.7 ± 0.4 5.3 ± 0.4 19.39 ± 0.04 18.77 ± 0.09 n 1 1 1 % LBulge/LT otal 11.32 ± 0.18 10.98 ± 0.32 9.68 ± 0.08 Disk h(") µ0(mag/arcsec2) Ellipticity Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal B/D Major axis (Type) µ0(mag/arcsec2) Bar 45 ± 5 21.86 ± 0.19 0.24 ± 0.06 118 ± 9 62.65 ± 0.15 0.17 ± 0.02 36 ± 6 20.9 ± 0.8 0.26 ± 0.05 116 ± 7 57.05 ± 0.15 0.18 ± 0.05 40 ± 3 20.44 ± 0.14 0.25 ± 0.08 119 ± 11 61.93 ± 0.15 0.15 ± 0.04 Flat Flat Flat 20.83 ± 0.01 20.03 ± 0.01 19.39 ± 0.01 α(") β(") 51.0 ± 0.5 9.2 ± 0.5 Minor axis (Type) Flat 51.0 ± 0.5 9.2 ± 0.5 Flat 19.0 ± 1.0 9.8 ± 0.5 99 ± 2 52.0 ± 0.5 8.6 ± 0.5 Flat 17.5 ± 0.5 9.2 ± 0.5 99 ± 2 19.0 ± 1.0 9.8 ± 0.5 98 ± 2 α(") β(") Position Angle Ellipticity % LBar/LT otal Structure Parameters Bulge re(") µe (mag/arcsec2) n % LBulge/LT otal Disk h(") 0.76 ± 0.02 26.03 ± 0.13 0.74 ± 0.02 31.95 ± 0.11 0.72 ± 0.02 28.38 ± 0.18 Table 9. Structural parameters of NGC 7606. B V R I 5.83 ± 0.11 21.84 ± 0.02 4.99 ± 0.05 20.73 ± 0.01 7.4 ± 0.2 20.74 ± 0.03 5.86 ± 0.06 19.74 ± 0.02 2.1 3 ± 1 51 ± 6 2.0 4 ± 1 43 ± 5 20.9 ± 0.3 0.59 ± 0.02 56 ± 2 96 ± 1 2.5 5.84 ± 0.24 43 ± 4 20.39 ± 0.25 0.59 ± 0.02 56 ± 2 94 ± 2 2.3 6 ± 1 40 ± 4 19.71 ± 0.25 0.59 ± 0.02 56 ± 2 94.7 ± 0.7 µ0(mag/arcsec2) Ellipticity Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal 21.85 ± 0.25 0.59 ± 0.03 53 ± 2 96.8 ± 0.7 B/D 0.034 ± 0.001 0.041 ± 0.003 0.067 ± 0.007 0.058 ± 0.002 14 M. Prieto et al: Structural components Table 10. Structural parameters of NGC 7723. Structure Bulge Parameters re(") B 3 ± 1 µe (mag/arcsec2) 20.66 ± 0.06 V R I 3.55 ± 0.14 19.63 ± 0.08 3.79 ± 0.04 19.46 ± 0.04 3.91 ± 0.02 18.49 ± 0.01 n % LBulge/LT otal Disk h(") µ0(mag/arcsec2) 1 5 ± 4 23 ± 7 21 ± 2 1 9 ± 1 22 ± 4 21 ± 1 1 8 ± 1 21 ± 3 20 ± 1 Ellipticity 0.31 ± 0.08 0.31 ± 0.06 0.32 ± 0.08 1 9.25 ± 0.05 22 ± 5 19.12 ± 0.01 0.31 ± 0.02 126 ± 2 86.1 ± 0.7 0.1 ± 0.1 Elliptical 20.3 ± 0.01 23 ± 1 Elliptical 11 ± 1 156 ± 3 Bar Position Angle % LDisk/LT otal B/D Major axis (Type) µ0(mag/arcsec2) a(") Minor axis (type) b(") Position angle Ellipticity 127 ± 3 91 ± 14 0.06 ± 0.35 Elliptical 129 ± 7 82 ± 10 0.1 ± 0.1 Elliptical 128 ± 9 86 ± 8 0.09 ± 0.07 Elliptical 22.41 ± 0.02 21.15 ± 0.01 21.02 ± 0.01 22 ± 1 Elliptical 11 ± 1 159 ± 4 0.5 ± 0.1 22 ± 1 Elliptical 13 ± 1 157 ± 5 21 ± 1 Elliptical 14 ± 1 157 ± 4 % LBar/LT otal 3.81 ± 0.32 0.59 ± 0.07 8.87 ± 0.08 0.66 ± 0.07 6.79 ± 0.07 0.47 ± 0.06 5.02 ± 0.04 Table 11. Structural parameters of NGC 7753. Structure Parameters Bulge re(") V 4 ± 1 R 3 ± 1 I 4 ± 1 µe (mag/arcsec2) 20.64 ± 0.12 19.54 ± 0.23 19.45 ± 0.09 n %LBulge/LT otal Disk h(") 2 9 ± 2 22 ± 3 2 7 ± 1 21 ± 4 2 12 ± 2 20 ± 3 Bar µ0(mag/arcsec2) 20.64±0.02 20.18 ± 0.01 19.64 ± 0.01 Ellipticity Position angle %LDisk/LT otal 0.2 ± 0.1 150 ± 10 90 ± 2 0.2 ± 0.1 147 ± 11 91 ± 1 0.2 ± 0.1 150 ± 10 85 ± 3 B/D Type 0.09 ± 0.04 Elliptical 0.08 ± 0.05 Elliptical 0.14 ± 0.09 Elliptical µ0(mag/arcsec2) 22.29 ± 0.01 21.20 ± 0.03 20.41 ± 0.05 a(") Position angle Ellipticity %LBar/LT otal 8.6 ± 0.5 170 ± 3 0.45 ± 0.03 0.88 ± 0.08 10.8 ± 0.5 171 ± 2 0.45 ± 0.02 2.24 ± 0.12 12.4 ± 0.5 175 ± 3 0.44 ± 0.03 4.31 ± 0.23 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 15 1. Structural decomposition of the surface-brightness profiles along the semi-minor bar axis (left) and semi-major bar axis (right) of NGC 1300 in B, R, and I. Fig 16 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 NGC5992 B bulge disk total bar 10 20 30 Radial distance(arcsec) NGC5992 R bulge disk total bar 10 20 30 Radial distance(arcsec) 16 18 20 22 24 2 c e s c r a / g a m 40 26 0 16 18 20 22 24 2 c e s c r a / g a m 40 26 0 NGC5992 V bulge disk total bar 10 20 30 Radial distance(arcsec) NGC5992 I bulge disk total bar 10 20 30 Radial distance(arcsec) 2. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 5992 in B, V , R, and I. 40 40 Fig M. Prieto et al: Structural components 17 3. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 6056 in B, V , R, and I. Fig 18 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 4. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 6661 in B, V , R, and I. Fig M. Prieto et al: Structural components 19 5. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 6946 in V , R, and I. Fig 20 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 6. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 7013 in B, V , R, and I. Fig M. Prieto et al: Structural components 21 NGC7217 B bulge disk total ring 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 NGC7217 R bulge disk total ring 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 18 20 22 24 0 16 18 20 22 0 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 16 18 20 22 24 0 16 18 20 22 24 0 NGC7217 V bulge disk total ring 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 NGC7217 I bulge disk total ring 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 7. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 7217 in B, V , R, and I. Fig 22 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 8. Structural decomposition of the surface-brightness profiles along the semi-minor bar axis (left) and semi-major bar axis (right) of NGC 7479 in V , R, and I. Fig M. Prieto et al: Structural components 23 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0 NGC7606 B bulge disk total 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 NGC7606 R bulge disk total 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 NGC7606 V bulge disk total 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 NGC7606 I bulge disk total 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 9. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 7606 in B, V , R, and I. Fig 24 M. Prieto et al: Structural components 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 18 20 22 24 26 0 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 NGC7723 B bulge disk total bar 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 NGC7723 V bulge disk total bar 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 NGC7723 B star formation disk total bar bulge 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 NGC7723 V star formation disk total bar bulge 2 c e s c r a / g a m 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 2 c e s c r a / g a m 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Radial distance (arcsec) NGC7723 R NGC7723 R bulge disk total bar 2 c e s c r a / g a m 16 18 20 22 24 26 star formation disk total bar bulge 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Radial distance (arcsec) NGC7723 I NGC7723 I bulge disk total bar 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 2 c e s c r a / g a m 16 18 20 22 24 26 0 star formation disk total bar bulge 40 20 Radial distance (arcsec) 60 80 100 120 Fig 10. Structural decomposition of the surface-brightness profiles along the semi-minor bar axis (left) and semi-major bar axis (right) of NGC 7723 in B, V , R, and I. M. Prieto et al: Structural components 25 NGC7753 R ring bulge disk total 20 40 60 80 Radial distance (arcsec) NGC7753 V ring bulge disk total 20 40 60 Radial distance (arcsec) NGC7753 I ring bulge disk total 20 40 60 Radial distance (arcsec) 16 18 20 22 24 2 c e s c r a / g a m 80 0 80 2 c e s c r a / g a m 2 c e s c r a / g a m 18 20 22 24 0 16 18 20 22 24 0 11. Structural decomposition of the average surface-brightness profiles of NGC 7753 in V , R, and I. Fig
astro-ph/0105327	1	0105	2001-05-18T13:02:35	A turbulent MHD model for molecular clouds and a new method of accretion on to star-forming cores	[ "astro-ph" ]	We describe the results of a sequence of simulations of gravitational collapse in a turbulent magnetized region. The parameters are chosen to be representative of molecular cloud material. We find that several protostellar cores and filamentary structures of higher than average density form. The filaments inter-connect the high density cores. Furthermore, the magnetic field strengths are found to correlate positively with the density, in agreement with recent observations. We make synthetic channel maps of the simulations and show that material accreting onto the cores is channelled along the magnetized filamentary structures. This is compared with recent observations of S106, and shown to be consistent with these data. We postulate that this mechanism of accretion along filaments may provide a means for molecular cloud cores to grow to the point where they become gravitationally unstable and collapse to form stars.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 7 (2001) Printed 24 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v1.4) A turbulent MHD model for molecular clouds and a new method of accretion on to star-forming cores D. Balsara1, D. Ward-Thompson2, R. M. Crutcher1,3 1NCSA, University of Ilinois, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, USA 2Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, PO Box 913, Cardiff CF2 3YB 3Dept of Astronomy, University of Ilinois, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, USA Accepted 2001 April 1; Received 2001 March 13; in original form 1999 December 1. ABSTRACT We describe the results of a sequence of simulations of gravitational collapse in a tur- bulent magnetized region. The parameters are chosen to be representative of molecular cloud material. We find that several protostellar cores and filamentary structures of higher than average density form. The filaments inter-connect the high density cores. Furthermore, the magnetic field strengths are found to correlate positively with the density, in agreement with recent observations. We make synthetic channel maps of the simulations and show that material accreting onto the cores is channelled along the magnetized filamentary structures. This is compared with recent observations of S106, and shown to be consistent with these data. We postulate that this mechanism of accretion along filaments may provide a means for molecular cloud cores to grow to the point where they become gravitationally unstable and collapse to form stars. Key words: stars: formation 1 INTRODUCTION Surveys of the densest cores of molecular clouds (eg: Ben- son & Myers 1989; Ward-Thompson et al. 1994) have shown them to be sites of active star formation, which can collapse under self-gravity to form objects known as protostars. A protostar is an object which will evolve into a star, but which is currently in the process of accreting the major part of its final main sequence mass (eg: Andr´e, Ward-Thompson & Barsony 1993 ; Shu et al 1993). The nature of this ac- cretion process is still a matter of debate, although it is known that for low-mass stars (M ≤ 4 -- 5 M⊙) the proto- star finally emerges from its enveloping cloud of material onto a well-defined pre-main sequence track on the H-R di- agram (Stahler, Shu & Taam 1980), and hence to the main sequence. Much current debate centres around how dense cores in molecular clouds form initially, and how they subsequently evolve. One school of thought suggests that cores form by Jeans-type gravitational instabilities (eg: Blitz & Williams 1997), and subsequently evolve to higher densities by means of ambipolar diffusion (eg: Ciolek & Mouschovias 1994). This is a process whereby a large-scale magnetic field threading the dense core supports the ionised component of the mate- rial against collapse while the neutral gas diffuses under self- gravity towards the centre of mass. This causes the centre of the core to increase in density until a critical mass-to-flux ratio is reached, and runaway gravitational collapse sets in. c(cid:13) 2001 RAS However, there is a growing body of observational evi- dence that these quasi-static equilibrium processes are not the only important physical processes in the evolution of the interstellar medium. Excess emission at higher veloci- ties than purely thermal emission (e.g. Falgarone & Phillips 1990) have been explained in terms of intermittent velocity behaviour, which is a characteristic of turbulence. It has also been shown that the linewidths of molecular gas emission can be decomposed into a thermal and a non-thermal com- ponent (e.g. Casselli & Myers 1995), where the non-thermal component is produced by turbulence. Likewise, it has been seen (Crutcher 1999) that there is a strong tendency for molecular cloud material to have velocities that are super- sonic and mildly sub-Alfvenic. Therefore, any complete un- derstanding of the physics of the interstellar medium should include consideration of a self-gravitating magnetohydrody- namic (MHD) fluid undergoing turbulence. There have been a number of MHD models that have recently been published. For example, Gammie & Ostriker (1996) showed that MHD turbulence can inhibit gravita- tional collapse. However, that model was limited to a slab ge- ometry for molecular clouds. Subsequently, Ostriker, Gam- mie & Stone (1999) presented the results of a 2.5-D MHD simulation, and showed that the ratio of magnetic to ther- mal pressures in a molecular cloud provides an indicator as to how the cloud will evolve to form stars. A number of authors have shown that turbulence tends to decay on rela- tively short time-scales compared to the life-times of molec- 2 D. Balsara, D. Ward-Thompson, R. M. Crutcher Figure 2. Isosurfaces of density and magnetic field magnitude superposed. Cyan, yellow and red indicate isosurfaces of density that are four, six and eight times the mean density. Purple and magenta indicate isosurfaces of the magnitude of the magnetic field that are five and seven times the mean. Note the spatial coincidence of density and magnetic field strength. 1999; Benson & Myers 1989 and references therein). Periodic boundary conditions were utilized. The initial conditions are very similar to the unforced models described in Balsara & Pouquet (1999) with the only difference that the simulation presented here is self-gravitating. This simulation is one of several isothermal and mildly adiabatic (adiabatic index of 1.2) simulations that we have carried out over a range of realistic turbulent rms Mach num- bers and Alfven Mach numbers. Truelove et al. (1997) found that isothermal collapse can form gravitationally condensed structures on all scales, which is unphysical, but that an adiabatic equation of state can arrest collapse on certain scales. A compromise to this issue was suggested by Boss et al. (2000), who advocated using a barotropic equation of state. We intend to explore this solution in subsequent pa- pers, but we note that the compromise between adiabatic and isothermal equations of state that we present herein ap- pears to overcome the problems noted by Truelove et al. (1997). The simulation was carried out on a fixed grid, and it is well documented that the grid-based criterion needs to be satisfied for the condensed objects (cores) in order for their inner structure to be properly analyzed (e.g. Truelove et al. 1997). Satisfying the grid-based Jeans criterion is not always possible on all scales. However, our focus in this paper is not on the inner detailed structure of the cores, rather it is on the accretion that takes place on to the cores. For those length- scales our conclusions are unaffected by the grid-based Jeans criterion. We evolved the model using the RIEMANN code for numerical MHD (Roe & Balsara 1996; Balsara 1998a&b; Balsara & Spicer 1999a&b). 2.1 Results of the simulations Figure 1(a) shows the simulated total intensity, assuming op- tically thin emission, from the model cube after a few cross- ing times. It can be seen that the model molecular cloud has some regions of lower than average density, as well as compact regions of much higher density. Furthermore, the regions of highest density appear to be connected to one an- other by linear features. Examination of the whole model c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 Figure 1. Panel (a) (upper) shows the simulated total intensity, assuming optically thin emission, from the model cube once pro- nounced cores have formed. The red outline identifies the core magnified in Figure 1(b). Panel (b) (lower) shows the integrated intensity from the core delineated in Figure 1(a). Velocity channel maps for this core are shown in Figure 3. ular clouds (e.g. Stone et al., 1998; MacLow 1999). However, there are many potential driving mechanisms of turbulence that could counteract this decay, such as stellar winds, jets and outflows, as well as large-scale motions such as shear- ing caused by Galactic differential rotation. In this paper we present the results of fully three-dimensional simulations of turbulent MHD flows in molecular clouds and compare them with observations. 2 THE MODEL A three dimensional cubic computational domain with 2563 zones that is initially 2 pc across was set up with a density of 10−20 g cm−3. A tapered exponential spectrum of velocity and magnetic fluctuations was initially used (see Balsara & Pouquet 1999; Balsara, Crutcher & Pouquet 1996; Balsara, Crutcher & Pouquet 1999). The initial conditions consisted of flow that had a turbulent root-mean square (rms) Mach number of 1.5 and an Alfven Mach number of unity. These initial conditions are consistent with the observations of sev- eral molecular clouds, particularly those 'starless' clouds in which star formation has not yet begun (e.g. Crutcher Turbulent MHD model for molecular clouds 3 Figure 3. Panels (a) -- (c) (left-hand column) and (d) -- (f) (right-hand column) show simulated channel maps of the same dense core shown in Figure 1(b) and its surrounding filamentary structure. Each panel represents a single velocity slice through the region. The ratios of the line of sight velocity to the thermal width are −1.04, −0.80, −0.66, −0.41, −0.27 and −0.07 respectively. c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 4 D. Balsara, D. Ward-Thompson, R. M. Crutcher cube reveals that these linear features are essentially one- dimensional filaments, rather than two-dimensional sheets seen 'edge-on'. All of the filaments terminate in at least one high density region, while many of the filaments link two high density regions. The filaments arise as a result of con- verging gas flows in a turbulent medium. We also see in our simulations that matter accretes on to the cores along the filaments. The high density cores are all compact, and have diameters ranging from a few hundredths of a parsec to little over a tenth of a parsec. The larger cores are reasonably well-resolved, occupying over twenty zones. However, all of the cores satisfy the numerical resolution criterion (e.g. Truelove et al. 1997). The densities of the cores are high, having typical values of n(H2) ≥6×104cm−3. These sizes and densities are consistent with those observed in dense cores in actual molecular clouds (e.g. Benson & Myers 1989). We have analyzed the correlation between the magnetic field strength and the density in such simulations (Balsara et al. 1999) where we showed that statistically there is a very strong positive correlation. In Figure 2 we show the correlation visually using iso-surfaces of density and mag- netic field magnitude superposed on the same image of an isolated core. Thus cyan, yellow and red indicate iso-surfaces of density that are four, six and eight times the mean density. Purple and magenta indicate iso-surfaces of the magnitude of the magnetic field that are five and seven times the mean. We see that both the density and magnetic field correlate positively and also that they are stretched out in elongated filamentary structures. Furthermore, the magnetic field di- rection typically lies along the cores, where it could serve to 'funnel' gas onto cores (see below). Quantitative analysis shows that several of the cores are magnetically supercritical, in agreement with the observa- tional findings (Crutcher 1999). The model has, therefore, il- lustrated the topological structures of density and magnetic field in turbulent magnetized molecular clouds and cores. 2.2 Accretion onto cores Figure 3 shows simulated channel maps of one of the dense cores and its surrounding filamentary structures. The chan- nel maps were made assuming optically thin emission. The region of Figure 1(a) that we have magnified in Figure 3 is shown by the red outline in Figure 1(a) and is also shown in close-up in Figure 1(b). The channel maps were obtained by convolving the line of sight velocity with the thermal broad- ening. Analysis of the channel maps shows that the magni- fied region consists of two cores that are very well separated in velocity space. We focus on one of them here. Figure 1(b) shows the integrated intensity of the se- lected core. Each of the panels of Figure 3 represents a single velocity slice through the region. The caption gives the ratio of the line of sight velocity to the thermal width. The range of those numbers clearly shows that the motions are indeed supersonic. Figure 3(c) corresponds to the core's rest veloc- ity. From Figure 1(b) we notice that there is one filament heading in a north-easterly direction from the core. In most situations it is reasonable to expect that matter will accelerate along one part of a filament and also deceler- ate along another part. Gravity should cause the mass to ac- celerate towards a core, while certain magnetic field topolo- gies, as well as the presence of shocks or density gradients in the accreting material, would cause matter to decelerate as it approaches a core. The simulated channel maps allow us to dissect the acceleration or decelaration of mass as it flows along the filaments. In general the filaments can be curved, but a simple model that assumes linear filaments that make contact with a core at one of their ends allows us to draw some simple deductions on how to interpret channel maps. Figure 4(a) shows a schematic diagram of a core that has two filaments with accreting matter that is decelerat- ing towards the core. A little reflection shows that, if there is pure deceleration of accreting matter that is flowing in a linear filament towards the core, the local maximum in the emission intensity should appear to move away from the core as one steps away (in velocity space) from the core's rest velocity. This is schematically illustrated in Figure 4(b), where we show the motion of the intensity maxima in the channel maps. Pure accceleration of matter in a linear fila- ment should show the opposite trend in the channel maps. It should also be pointed out that constant velocity flow along a curved filament can also appear to be an acceleration or a deceleration depending on the filament's orientation relative to the observer. The schematic diagrams in Figure 4 allow one to inter- pret the simulated channel maps in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) shows only the core with a very faint suggestion of filamen- tary structure. Figures 3(a) -- (f), viewed in sequence, show the intensity in the filament become progressively stronger as the core itself becomes fainter. In Figure 3(e) the core is decidedly fainter than the filament and in Figure 3(f) it is very much fainter than the filament. By viewing Figures 3(a) through to 3(f) in sequence one also notices that the inten- sity maximum in the filament moves away from the core in a north-westerly direction traced out by the filament in the total intensity map of Figure 1(b). In view of the discussion above, we interpret this as deceleration of matter along the filament in the simulated channel maps in Figure 3. From the range of velocities quoted in Figure 3 we notice that the velocity ranges over an entire Mach number in this case. We have carried out such imaging for numerous cores in the simulation presented here as well as in numerous other simulations that we have carried out. While a filamentary structure that is aligned along the line of sight will not stand out prominently, we found that most cores have filamentary structures around them. Larger cores show more filamentary structures, a fact that finds a natural explanation in this scenario, as will be shown below. The velocities that develop along these filaments correspond to a range of one or more Mach numbers. What we appear to be observing in Figure 3 is material decelerating along a filament towards a dense core. Remem- ber that the densest regions in the simulated molecular cloud are also the regions of highest magnetic flux density. Thus the filaments, as well as being regions of higher density, are also regions of higher magnetic flux density. Figure 2, as well as our earlier results (see Balsara et al. 1998) have shown us that the magnetic field lines tend to lie along the filaments. Hence these filaments are effectively magnetic flux tubes in the molecular cloud, which are linked to the dense cloud cores. So we interpret Figure 3 as illustrating how material can be channelled by magnetic flux tubes and flow onto the dense cores. Thus the model simulation has indicated one c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 V = - 3 X V = - 2 X V = + 3 X V = + 2 X V = - 1 V = + 1 X X Fig 4b Core Filament Eye Fig 4a Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of a core undergoing accretion along filaments. The shaded area denotes the core. The two lin- ear structures correspond to two filaments. The arrows along the filaments denote velocity vectors. The rest velocity of the core is taken to be zero. The image of the physical system is shown in plan view. To break the degeneracy of having the two filaments appear in the same line we ask the reader to tip the edge of the figure that is farther from the eye a little above the plane of the paper. (b) Schematic diagram of the channel maps that would be produced by the situation in (a). The 'X' in the channel maps shows the core's location. The shaded blob shows the location of the intensity maximum at that scaled velocity (which is shown immediately above each channel map). method in which dense cores may evolve and grow in mass by accretion along magnetic flux tubes. We also document that this process is seen to occur very often for other cores that form in several of our simulations. This suggests that the amount of mass built up by a core over time will depend strongly on the topological struc- ture of the magnetic fields that link to that core. The fact that larger cores seem to have more filaments is now consis- tently explained by the fact that larger cores are connected to more magnetic flux tubes which, therefore, supply them with accreting matter at a faster rate. Our new paradigm for core formation seems to form a substantial number of magnetically supercritical cores. While consistent with re- cent observations (e.g. Crutcher 1999) this fact is at variance with a previous paradigm for core formation (Mouschovias and Spitzer 1976) which suggests that cores that form are initially magnetically subcritical and only a portion of the core becomes supercritical through the workings of ambipo- lar diffusion. The difference in the two paradigms stems from the fact that matter is accreted directly along field lines in these dy- namical models while the previous models thought of core formation as taking place through a sequence of quasi-steady states. In other work (Balsara, Crutcher and Pouquet 1999) we showed that ambipolar diffusion does not play a signif- icant role in damping out the turbulence because the non- linear eddy turnover times are shorter than the ambipolar diffusion time. Hence the inclusion or exclusion of ambipolar diffusion does not strongly affect these results. In the next section we compare the model findings with one particular molecular cloud region, to discover whether the predictions of the model may actually occur in reality. c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 Turbulent MHD model for molecular clouds 5 3 COMPARISON WITH S106 In Figure 5 we show 13CO channel maps of the S106 molecu- lar cloud. The black contours trace the 800-µm dust contin- uum emission and, therefore, serve to identify the location of the protostellar core. The numbers at the corner of the figures show the velocity in kms−1 for each of the channel maps. Figure 5(d) corresponds to the core's rest velocity. Based on temperature measurements of S106 the thermal sound speed can be estimated to be 0.5 kms−1 S106 contains at its eastern edge S106-IR, and at its western edge the core which was identified from its sub- millimeter dust emission as S106-FIR (Richer et al. 1993). The latter source has no known outflow or associated pro- tostar, and so is a candidate core for comparison with our model. There are two filaments which join this core from the north-east that can be seen partly over-lapping in Figure 5. There is also a much smaller filamentary structure that joins it from the south-east. The two north-eastern filaments over- lap each other to a great extent in the total intensity maps but can be separated from each other in the channel maps. The temperature in the filamentary gas has been measured and is too low to permit one to interpret the filaments as outflowing gas. The channel maps in Figure 5 of the velocity struc- ture taken with the BIMA interferometer show evidence for velocity deceleration in the gas that is accreting along the length of the filaments if one assumes that the filaments are not curved along the line of sight (Roberts & Crutcher 2001). However, one of the filaments in S106 appears to be curved in the plane of the sky, making it difficult to deduce whether we are seeing acceleration or deceleration along it. In any case, the existence of filamentary structures and the motion of the intensity maxima along the filaments as one steps through the channel maps in Figure 5 shows that these data are in close agreement with the model predictions shown in Figure 3. Thus we conclude that the accretion process in this core of S106 is taking place preferentially along the filaments. Polarimetric observations (Hildebrand et al 1995; Hol- land et al 1996) suggest that the magnetic field is also pref- erentially aligned along the long axis of the filaments, a fact that is also consistent with the simulations. Thus the data for this cloud suggest a scenario where the magnetic fields serve to channel the accreting material along the filaments, and the data are consistent with our hypothesised model sce- nario. If this hypothesis is proved by further observations, then we have shown how cores grow to become super-critical, and hence collapse to form stars. 4 CONCLUSIONS Using simulated channel maps from a numerical MHD sim- ulation in conjunction with observational data of S106, we have been able to arrive at several insights into the process of accretion onto the molecular cloud cores in which stars form: (i) Turbulent MHD processes cause the formation of high density cores; (ii) The cores are linked by extended filamentary struc- tures; (iii) Several of the simulated cores are found to be mag- netically supercritical; 6 D. Balsara, D. Ward-Thompson, R. M. Crutcher Figure 5. 13CO channel maps of the S106 molecular cloud. The black contours trace the 800-µm dust continuum emission and therefore serve to identify the location of the protostellar core. The numbers at the corners of the figures show the velocity in kms−1. c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 Turbulent MHD model for molecular clouds 7 Roe P. L., Balsara D. S., 1996, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 56, 57 Shu F. H., Najita J., Galli D., Ostriker E., Lizano S., 1993, in: Levy E. H., Lunine J. I., eds., 'Protostars and Planets III', 3, University of Arizona Press, Tucson Stahler S., Shu F. H., Taam R. E. 1980, ApJ, 242, 226 Truelove J. K., Klein R. I., McKee C. F., Holliman J. H., Howell L. H., Greenough J. A., 1997, ApJ, 489, L179 Ward-Thompson D., Scott P., Hills R. E., Andr´e P., 1994, MN- RAS, 268, 276 (iv) The higher density filaments are aligned with the magnetic field structure; (v) The accretion onto the cores takes place along the filaments; (vi) This suggests a scenario where the material is chan- nelled by the magnetic field and flows under the gravita- tional influence of the dense cores at the ends of the fila- ments, accreting onto the cores themselves; (vii) The amount of matter accreting on to a core thus depends on the topological structure of the magnetic fields that link to that core; (viii) Our observations of S106 appear to show this pro- cess occurring in a real molecular cloud. If observations of other regions show similar results, then this would show that we have distinguished for the first time an important way in which star-forming cores ac- crete matter to the point where they have gained sufficient mass to undergo dynamical collapse and form stars. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DB wishes to thank A.Pouquet and C.McKee for useful dis- cussions. We also wish to thank S.Levy and R. Patterson for help with the images. The use of SDSC supercomputer time is also gratefully acknowledged. REFERENCES Andr´e P., Ward-Thompson D., Barsony M. 1993, ApJ 406, 122 Benson P. J., Myers P. C., 1989, ApJS, 71, 89 Balsara D. S., Crutcher R. M., Pouquet A., 1996, in: Holt, S., Mundy L. G., eds., 'Star Formation Near and Far', p. 89, AIP Press Balsara D. S., Crutcher R. M., Pouquet A., 1999, ApJ, submitted Balsara D. S., 1998a, ApJS, 116, 119 Balsara D. S., 1998b, ApJS, 116, 133 Balsara D. S., Pouquet A., 1999, Physics of Plasmas, 6, 89 Balsara D. S., Pouquet A., Ward-Thompson D., Crutcher R. M., 1999, in: Franco J., Carraminana A., eds., 'Interstellar Tur- bulence' Cambridge Contemporary Astrophysics, p. 261 Balsara D. S., Spicer D. S., 1999a, J. Comp. Phys., 148, 133 Balsara D. S., Spicer D. S., 1999b, J. Comp. Phys., 149, 270 Benson P., Myers P. C., 1989, ApJS, 71, 89 Blitz L., Williams J. P., 1997, 488, L145 Boss A. P., Fisher R. T., Klein R. I., McKee C. F., 2000, ApJ, 528, 325 Caselli P., Myers P. C., 1995, ApJ, 446, 665 Ciolek G. E., Mouschovias T. Ch., 1994, ApJ, 425, 142 Crutcher, R. M., 1999, ApJ, 520, 706 Falgarone E., Phillips T. G., 1990, ApJ, 231, 438 Gammie C. F., Ostriker E. C., 1996, ApJ, 466, 814 Hildebrand R. H., Dotson J. L., Dowell C. D., Platt S. R., Schle- uning D., Davidson J. A., Novak, G. 1995, in: Haas M. R., Davidson J. A., Erickson E. F., eds., 'Airborne Astronomy Symposium on the Galactic Ecosystem' ASP Conference Se- ries, 73, 97 Holland W. S., Greaves J. S., Ward-Thompson D., Andr´e P., 1996, A&A, 309, 267 MacLow M., 1999, ApJ, 524, 169 Mouschovias T. Ch., Spitzer L. 1976, ApJ, 210, 326 Ostriker E. C., Gammie C. F., Stone J. M., 1999, ApJ, 513, 274 Richer J. S., Padman R., Ward-Thompson D., Hills R. E., Harris A. I., 1993, MNRAS, 262, 839 Roberts, D., Crutcher, R. M. 2001, ApJ, submitted c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7
astro-ph/0306594	1	0306	2003-06-27T18:50:53	Star Formation History and Other Properties of the Northern HDF	[ "astro-ph" ]	The original analysis of the star formation history in the NICMOS Deep images of the NHDF is extended to the entire NHDF utilizing NICMOS and WFPC2 archival data. The roughly constant star formation rate from redshifts 1 to 6 found in this study is consistent with the original results. Star formation rates from this study, Lyman break galaxies and sub-mm observations are now in concordance The spike of star formation at redshift 2 due to 2 ULIRGs in the small Deep NICMOS field is smoothed out in the larger area results presented here. The larger source base of this study allows comparison with predictions from hierarchical galaxy formation models. In general the observation are consistent with the predictions. The observed luminosity functions at redshifts 1-6 are presented for future comparisons with theoretical galaxy evolution calculations. Mid and far infrared properties of the sources are also calculated and compared with observations. A candidate for the VLA source VLA 3651+1221 is discussed.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astrophysical Journal Star Formation History and Other Properties of the Northern HDF Rodger I. Thompson Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 ABSTRACT The original analysis of the star formation history in the NICMOS Deep images of the NHDF is extended to the entire NHDF utilizing NICMOS and WFPC2 archival data. The roughly constant star formation rate from redshifts 1 to 6 found in this study is consistent with the original results. Star formation rates from this study, Lyman break galaxies and sub-mm observations are now in concordance The spike of star formation at redshift 2 due to 2 ULIRGs in the small Deep NICMOS field is smoothed out in the larger area results presented here. The larger source base of this study allows comparison with predictions from hierarchical galaxy formation models. In general the observation are consis- tent with the predictions. The observed luminosity functions at redshifts 1-6 are presented for future comparisons with theoretical galaxy evolution calculations. Mid and far infrared properties of the sources are also calculated and compared with observations. A candidate for the VLA source VLA 3651+1221 is discussed. Subject headings: Early Universe -- galaxies:evolution -- galaxies:distances and redshifts 1. Introduction The Hubble Deep Fields (HDFs) are rich sources of data on cosmology and the evolution of galaxies. The large number of observations at many different wavelengths make the Northern HDF (NHDF) particularly useful. The NHDF is the only HDF that has complete coverage with both WFPC2 and NICMOS. The NICMOS coverage, however, is not to the same depth as the WFPC2 due to the smaller area of the NICMOS Camera 3. This is somewhat compensated for by the red nature of evolved galaxies and the redshift of visible light into the infrared bands for young blue galaxies. -- 2 -- This work studies the star formation history in the NHDF and is an extension of a similar study utilizing the smaller NICMOS Deep field (Thompson, Weymann and Storrie-Lombardi 2001) (hereinafter TWS). The increased area and number of galaxies greatly improves the statistical significance of the results over TWS. Shallower coverage, however, increases the photometric error, making it comparable or dominant over the large scale structure error which decreased due to the larger field. Other researchers, Lanzetta, Yahil & Fern´andez-Soto (1996); Fern´andez-Soto, Lanzetta, & Yahil (1999); Lanzetta et al. (2002) have utilized the same data set, plus additional ground based data to investigate star formation history in the NHDF. Our analysis differs signifi- cantly from those studies by including extinction in the SED templates used to determine the photometric redshifts. This produces results quite different from Lanzetta et al. (2002) who do not include extinction. Contrary to Lanzetta et al. (2002) we find that the star formation rate (SFR) is essentially constant in the epoch from z = 1 to z = 6 and that this rate is significantly larger than the present day SFR (Lilly et al. 1996), consistent with the results presented in TWS. 2. Observations Observations utilized in this study are all from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) archives. The first set is the processed WFPC2 images of the NHDF produced by Williams et al. (1996). The second set is the archival data from the NICMOS survey of the entire NHDF by Dickinson (2000). The NICMOS F110W and F160W data were reprocessed as described in § 3. Only the areas corresponding to the three wide field WFPC2 chips are used since the WFPC2 PC chip images have substantially different signal to noise statistics. NICMOS Deep NHDF images and data reductions from Thompson et al. (1999) and TWS are used in the error analysis. All NICMOS images were taken in the SPARSE64 mode with 24 samples after the first read and integration times of 1344 seconds. Images at 8 positions completely covered the NHDF. At each position 9 images were taken in a dithered pattern. The 8 positions with 9 dither points in the F110W and F160W filters required 144 exposures. 3. Data Reduction The data reduction procedures are almost identical to the procedures described in Thompson et al. (1999) and TWS. For this reason they will only be briefly outlined except -- 3 -- where there are differences. The WFPC2 images were not altered from the Version 2 images available in the HST archives. The NICMOS images, however, were reduced from the raw images obtained in the HST cycle 7 program 7817 by Mark Dickinson. The images were examined for effects of cosmic ray persistence from SAA passages and 17 of the 144 images were rejected. The background flux was removed by taking the median of the images in each filter that were not affected by cosmic ray persistence and subtracting it from each image. The 9 dithered images for each of the 8 positions were combined using the standard Drizzle procedures with 0.1 arc second pixels, one half the linear size of the NICMOS Cam- era 3 pixels. The IDL procedure IDP3 (Lytle et al. 1999) produced a mosaic of the 8 images. IDP3 also reduced the WFPC images to the NICMOS resolution with a bi-cubic spline in- terpolation and aligned them with the NICMOS mosaic. Inspection of the images showed regions of increased noise at the boundaries between images. These areas were masked out as shown in Figure 1. Since this study is primarily a statistical study, the small amount of masked area does not affect the conclusions. -- 4 -- Fig. 1. -- The masked areas shown on the WFPC2 F814W filter image of the NHDF. -- 5 -- Source positions were found using the method of Szalay, Connolly, & Szokoly (1999) as described in TWS. A Gaussian fit to the histogram of pixel values determined the global variance of the image mosaic in each filter. The histogram is dominated by the background noise with true sources creating a deviation from the Gaussian fit at large positive values. The 1 σ noise levels in both the F110W and F160W NICMOS filters are 5 × 10−4 ADUs per second. For comparison the NICMOS Deep Field has a 1 σ noise level of 2.2 × 10−4 ADUs per second. 5 × 10−4 ADUs per second corresponds to 1.4 × 10−9 Janskys. The drizzling procedure, however, introduces correlation, therefore, the true noise level is about 1.6 times larger than the measured Gaussian noise. The Szalay source identification procedure requires images with a local variance of one. The local variances for the F110W and F160W fields were found by drizzling and mosaicing the flat fields of the two filters in exactly the same way as the images. This accounts for differences in sensitivity over the area of the NICMOS Camera 3 detector. The flats have a median of 1, therefore, the variance images also have a median of 1. The ratio of the imaged fields to the variance image was scaled to the average variance creating a local variance of 1. The variance in the WFPC filters was assumed constant across the field. This procedure differs slightly from the procedure used in TWS. The threshold value of the Szalay R parameter, √χ, was set to 4.5, higher than the 2.3 value used in TWS but more appropriate for the six dimensional χ2 analysis of the combined WFPC and NICMOS fluxes. Unlike TWS all six fluxes are included in the Szalay procedure to insure that small blue galaxies with little infrared flux are not missed in the source extraction. The source selection criterion for determining the star formation history (§ 5.1), however, does discriminate against galaxies with no F110W or F160W flux. Figure 2 shows the distribution of R image pixels. All pixels with R values higher than or equal to 4.5 are considered legitimate source pixels. Pixels with R values less than 4.5 are assigned random values with average values 106 below the valid pixels. This forces the source extraction program to only consider pixels chosen by the Szalay procedure. The source extraction program crashes if all non-valid pixels are set to zero. The source extraction program SExtractor (SE) (Bertin and Arnouts 1996) extracts the sources in two passes. The first pass on the R has the extraction threshold set at 4.0, selecting all valid pixels. As in TWS the DETECT MINAREA parameter is set to 3 so a true source must have 3 contiguous valid pixels. The source positions, except for the contiguous area criterion are, therefore, determined by the Szalay procedure, not by SE. SE then runs again on the six photometric images in a mode that extracts sources in the pixel pattern determined by the first pass. Run in this manner, SE does not produce daughter objects. Sources which have several components may be broken into individual objects by this process. -- 6 -- Fig. 2. -- R image pixel distribution from the Szalay procedure. The asterisks represent the actual data and the solid line is the expected χ2 distribution with six degrees of freedom. The boxes show the difference between the data minus the expected distribution. The long tail at high R is the real source distribution. -- 7 -- Although listed as separate objects in the catalog the star formation history is unaffected as long as the calculated photometric redshift is the same for both components. In some cases a separate listing for two components is an advantage, allowing different extinctions for different components. § 5.1 discusses additional criteria for final source selection. The PHOT-APERTURES parameter in the SE configuration file was set to 6, 10, 15 to produce 0.6′′, 1.0′′, and 1.5′′ diameter aperture fluxes. The photometric, redshift, extinction and SED calculations use the 0.6′′ aperture fluxes. The total flux for determining the SFR is found by summing all of the pixels identified by the Szalay procedure as belonging to a single source. 4. Photometric Redshift, Extinction and SED Determination The basic procedure for photometric redshift, extinction and SED determination is a χ2 comparison of the observed fluxes in the six bands to fluxes calculated from numerically redshifted and extincted SEDs. As described in TWS we draw our templates from three sources. The first source is the four observed SEDs of Coleman, Wu, and Weedman (1980) utilized by several authors. These galaxy SEDs have been corrected for galactic extinction but not for extinction in the galaxies themselves. The galaxies, however, were selected on the basis of their very low internal extinction. The unreddened SED of the set of mean SEDs of Calzetti, Kinney & Storchi-Bergmann (1994) provides an additional observed active star-forming galaxy template (Calzetti (1999a)). A final and even hotter template is a 50 million year old continuous star formation SED calculated from the Bruzual and Charlot models (Bruzual and Charlot (1996)) with a Salpeter IMF and solar metallicity. This theoretical SED does not have emission lines, therefore we have added Hα, (O[III]+ Hβ) and O[II] emission lines by scaling up the lines from the Calzetti SED by the ratio of the UV fluxes in the Calzetti and Bruzual -- Charlot SEDs. Template 6 is substantially bluer than the Calzetti SED. Extinction is calculated from the starburst and star forming galaxy optimized obscura- tion law of Calzetti, Kinney & Storchi-Bergmann (1994). Since the primary purpose of this paper is a determination of the star formation rate it is appropriate to utilize an extinction law determined from star forming galaxies. The absorption due to extragalactic neutral hydrogen is calculated from an updated version of the formulation of Madau et al. (1996). The calculated fluxes are then interpolated between the 6 SEDs to produce 51 different SED fluxes for each redshift and extinction point. The details of this procedure are given in TWS. The grid for the χ2 analysis includes 100 different redshifts between 0 and 8, 15 different extinctions between E(B-V) of 0 to 1.0 and 51 different interpolated template types for a -- 8 -- total of 7.65×104 choices. The resulting redshifts, extinctions and SEDs are given in Table 2. The earliest SED has a value of 1.0 incremented by 0.1 to the latest SED of 6.0. Integer values refer to the 6 basic SED templates. Extinctions in E(B-V) are incremented by 0.02 from 0 to 0.1 and by .1 from 0.1 to 1.0, the maximum used in the analysis. The χ2 procedure is identical to TWS except that negative fluxes are not replaced by zero. The technique minimizes the χ2 residuals between the observed fluxes and those predicted by the numerically redshifted, extincted and Lyman absorption attenuated SEDs. It alters the usual error term in the denominator by adding a second term proportional to the measured flux. The χ2 residual is 6 χ(z, E)2 = !2 (1) Xi=1 (fi − A · f mod(z, E)i) i + (0.1fi)2 pσ2 The index i refers to the six fluxes, fi is the measured flux and f mod(z, E) is the flux predicted by a template at a redshift of z and extinction E(B-V) = E. Since this is not a formal χ2 calculation the quantitative probabilities associated with χ2 values are not strictly valid. The normalization constant A minimizes χ(z, E)2. A = 6 Xi=1 fi · f mod(z, E)i i + (0.1fi)2 / σ2 (f mod(z, E)i)2 σ2 i + (0.1fi)2 6 Xi=1 (2) The limit of the expression at very low flux levels is the standard form with the formal background, σ, dominating the denominator and at high flux levels it is the flux difference between the observations and the model divided by 10% of the flux instead of the σ. At high flux levels the errors in the fit are proportional to flux since the dominate errors are intra-pixel sensitivity variations and systematic flux errors. The accuracy of the NICMOS flux levels may be better than this. It is estimated to be 4 - 5% for this level of dithering but the output does not appear to strongly depend on the precise coefficient of the flux in the denominator of equation( 1). 4.1. Photometric Redshift Accuracy Photometric redshifts have gained a reasonable reputation for accuracy, particularly at high redshifts where the clear signature of the Lyman break is easy to observe. Two tests of the photometric redshifts derived in this work are comparison to available spectro- scopic NHDF redshifts and comparison with previous NHDF photometric redshifts (TWS, Fern´andez-Soto, Lanzetta, & Yahil (1999), Wang, Bachall, & Turner (1998)). -- 9 -- 4.1.1. Comparison with Spectroscopic Redshifts The primary source of spectroscopic redshifts is Cohen et al. (2000), enhanced and modified by Cohen (2001). The small reductions in the field area described in § 2 reduces the number of comparison redshifts to 135. Figure 3 shows the results of the comparison. The standard deviation is 0.29 in redshift, however, it is not constant with redshift. Most of the error occurs in the redshift range between 0 and 2, as is expected, since the prominent Lyman break does not appear in our data for that range. Note that galaxies in the redshift range between 0 and 0.5 are not used in this study. Catastrophic redshift errors, errors of more than 0.5 in redshift, are overploted with squares in Figure 3. Analysis of the 11 catastrophic failures reveals three basic types of failures. The first type is where there is no clear minimum in the χ2 value along the range of redshifts, extinctions or SED templates. These are characterized by a steadily decreasing χ2 value with a parameter, such as template, until the end of the parameter space is reached. This failure of the parameters to span the space of galaxy types is seen in 6 galaxies. The second category contains 5 galaxies that are most probably superpositions of two galaxies that have not been separated by the SE source extraction process. Both galaxies are con- tained in the LRIS 1′′ slit width used in the spectroscopic observations (Cohen et al. 2000). In this case the spectroscopic redshift would be determined by the galaxy with the most prominent spectral features while the photometric redshift would be most influenced by the galaxy with the highest continuum level. The third failure in 2 galaxies is an apparent mild degeneracy in parameters which tends to favor a redshift of about 0.5 for galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts between 0.5 and 1.0. These galaxies appear to be well fit at the correct redshift with an intermediate SED and low value of extinction or at a redshift of ∼.5 with a very hot template and a high value of extinction. This degeneracy creates a pile up of galaxies at redshifts of 0.48 and 0.56. Examination of the photometric redshifts for these sources where the extinction is forced to be zero did not give statistically better fits except in the extreme cases such as those in Table 1. This type of error can reduce the calculated SFR in the redshift 0.5 to 1.5 bin by moving some sources out of the bin to a redshift of 0.48 or reducing the calculated UV flux for a source that has been moved to a lower redshift erroneously. This would make the SFR for redshift a lower limit, subject to other errors. Note that some galaxies have multiple failure modes so that the number of failures listed is larger than the number of failed galaxies. -- 10 -- Table 1 lists the 11 galaxies with redshift errors larger than 0.5 along with their param- eters and the probable cause of the error. The general conclusion is that the photometric redshifts are quite adequate for statistical studies but can be subject to significant errors for individual galaxies. 4.1.2. Comparison with Previous Photometric Redshifts The comparison between the spectroscopic and photometric redshifts is dominated by low redshift fairly bright galaxies except for the few faint, high redshift galaxies that have spectroscopic redshifts through very long spectroscopic observations on the largest ground based telescopes. It might be expected that the agreement on bright sources may be better than for the more numerous faint galaxies. One test is a comparison between the photometric redshifts obtained in the Deep NICMOS field (TWS) with those found in this study. The NICMOS F110W and F160W images are completely independent between the two data sets while the WFPC2 image are in common except that KFOCAS was used for source extraction in TWS and SE is used here. The comparison primarily determines the differences introduced by noise in the F110W and F160W images. Redshifts from the NICMOS deep NHDF images should be more accurate than the redshifts from the present study due to the higher signal to noise of the deep images. A total of 283 galaxies in the Deep images also appear as legitimate galaxies in this set of images. Figure 4 shows a histogram of the differences in the redshifts between the deep and present images. The differences are peaked at zero as expected but do not appear to be a Gaussian distribution away from the peak. The differences are reasonably equally distributed between positive and negative values with a slight skew toward negative values (the present redshift higher than the deep redshift). The percentage of "catastrophic failures", a difference greater than 0.5, is 17%. Some of the failures create large differences in redshift. Examination of some cases with large differences reveals significant differences in either the F110W or F160W flux. As expected there is little variation in the WFPC2 fluxes measured by KFOCAS and SExtractor. The 17% significant redshift error from this comparison is higher than the 8% error found from the spectroscopic redshift comparison. In the final error analysis we will assume that 17% of the galaxies have redshift errors that are randomly distributed up to a maximum of 4. -- 11 -- Fig. 3. -- Plot of the spectroscopic redshifts from Cohen et al. (2000) versus the photometric redshifts determined in this work. Some high redshift objects have been added from other sources. Objects that have redshift differences greater than 0.5 are overplotted with a square symbol and are discussed in the text and Table 1. -- 12 -- Fig. 4. -- A histogram of the values of the Deep NICMOS NHDF photometric redshifts minus the photometric redshifts determined from this study. -- 13 -- 4.1.3. Comparison with Photometric Redshifts from Other Work There have been several other determinations of photometric redshift in the NHDF but only two (Wang, Bachall, & Turner 1998; Fern´andez-Soto, Lanzetta, & Yahil 1999) have readily accessible catalogs of redshift and object position. Figure 5 shows the comparison between this work and the redshifts obtained by the two groups. Coincidence of objects was determined by position correspondence within 0.3′′. The redshifts of both previous studies are offset to larger redshifts than this study. This effect is most probably due to both groups not correcting for extinction. Without extinction the only mechanism to make a galaxy redder is to redshift it or choose an earlier template. -- 14 -- Fig. 5. -- Histograms of the values of the photometric redshifts determined from this study minus the redshifts from Fern´andez-Soto, Lanzetta, & Yahil (1999) on the left and Wang, Bachall, & Turner (1998) on the right. In both case the redshifts from the cited works were subtracted from the redshifts found in this work. -- 15 -- 5. Catalog of Individual Source Properties Table 2 lists the individual sources, ordered by RA, that satisfy the criteria listed in §5.1. Column 1 gives the NICMOS identification number. Column 2 is the WFPC2 identification number of the galaxy from Williams et al. (1996) if there is positional coincidence within 0.3′′. Columns 3 and 4 are the the redshift and extinction. Column 5 contains the SFR in solar masses per year as determined in § 6. The bolometric luminosity of the galaxy is in column 6. The flux of a galaxy is obtained by integrating over the unextincted selected template scaled by the factor A from equation( 2). The bolometric luminosity then follows from the redshift and our adopted cosmology. The fraction of the luminosity that is extincted and therefore goes into far infrared flux is in column 7 followed by the calculated 6, 15 and 850 µm flux (mJy) in columns 8, 9 and 10 for comparison with measured ISO and SCUBA fluxes (§ 10). The luminosities, ISO fluxes and SCUBA fluxes of galaxies with a redshift of zero are all set to zero. Columns 11 and 12 give the template number T of the best fit, and the modified χ2 value of the fit from Equation 1. It should be noted that the distribution of the modified χ2 values will not rigorously follow a true χ2 distribution. The values are provided to give a qualitative indication of the relative goodness of fit for the best fit values of redshift, template type and E(B-V). Column 13 has the total F160W AB magnitude, determined by adding all of the pixels designated by SE as part of an object, followed by the 0.6 aperture F160W magnitude (Ap. mag) in column 14. Note that variations in local background as interpreted by SE can result in an aperture magnitude brighter than a total magnitude for faint galaxies. If no F160W magnitude is listed the object had a zero or negative measured F160W flux. Columns 15 and 16 are the right ascension and declination positions of the object. The RA listing contains only seconds and the DEC listing only minutes and seconds. 12.h 36.m should be added to the RA and 62.◦ to the DEC. Note that a few sources have RA values of 12.h 37.m plus seconds. These sources are found at the end of the catalog with seconds values between 0 and 1.2. 5.1. Source Selection Criteria Data reduction is performed on all sources detected by the Szalay procedure. Additional criteria for source selection are introduced before sources appear in the catalog of objects used for determining the star formation history. First all sources that are known stars are rejected. Next all objects that are too near the edge of the image to insure that no flux is lost are rejected. This step uses the SE internal flags and visual inspection of the image. Next a list of suspect objects are rejected from a visual inspection of the images. These -- 16 -- include objects with significant overlap that have been counted as a single object by SE and stellar diffraction spikes that were counted as objects. Next all objects with SE internal flags of 16 or greater, indicating that the photometric aperture was corrupted by some means, are rejected. Next is a criterion that all valid sources must have a signal to noise of 3.5 or greater in one band or a signal to noise of 2.5 or greater in two bands. Finally an accepted source is required to have a flux greater than 5 × 10−4 ADUs per second in both the F110W and F160W bands. All sources that meet these criteria are included in the catalog but only sources with redshifts between 0.5 and 6.5 are used in the star formation history analysis. Two other comments are in order on source selection. At this point, for the small number of objects that have known redshifts, the photometric redshift is replaced by the spectroscopic redshift in the analysis procedures. Second the bright galaxy NHDF 3-610 is rejected from the analysis due to impingment of the diffraction spike from the adjacent star and a clear overlap with another galaxy. For this reason, even though it is quite bright, it does not appear in Table 2. 5.2. Distribution of Source Properties Figure 6 shows the distribution of F160W magnitudes with redshift and the calculated tracks of an early, a late, and an extincted late L∗ galaxy. The early galaxy is template 1.0, the late galaxy template 6.0 and the extincted late galaxy is template 6.0 with an extinction of E(B-V) = 0.2. The sources are color coded with the earliest type galaxy deep red and the latest galaxy deep blue as indicated by the legend on the figure. As expected the majority of the early type galaxies lie at low redshift with some intermediate type galaxies up to redshifts of five. The majority of galaxies have template numbers between 5 and 6. Particularly at low values, there is apparent redshift banding. The band at zero redshift is due to galaxies with χ2 values that were still falling as they approached zero redshift, indicating that the were not matched by any of the galaxy templates. The band at redshift 0.5 does correspond to an over density observed in the spectroscopic redshift analysis of Cohen (2001) which also sees a small over density at a redshift of 1. It is tempting to interpret the banding in Figure 6 as sheets or nodes in large scale structure encountered by the pencil beam of the NHDF but the redshift analysis in § 4 does not seem to warrant that interpretation. This is particularly true for the band at 0.5 which may be due to the effect discussed in § 4.1.1. Investigation of the significance of the banding will be deferred to a later paper. Most of the galaxies in Figure 6 fall above the lines of the L∗ (3.4 × 1010 L⊙) galaxy -- 17 -- Fig. 6. -- The distribution of F160W AB 0.6′′ diameter aperture magnitudes versus photo- metric redshift. The solid and dashed lines indicate the F160W aperture magnitude of an early and late-type L∗ galaxy. The dash dot line shows the track of a late-type L∗ galaxy with an extinction of E(B-V) equal to 0.2. L∗ is defined as a total luminosity of 3.4 × 1010 L⊙ -- 18 -- tracks. Past a redshift of ∼3 there are several galaxies that lie significantly below the L∗ galaxy line. This is expected since there certainly are galaxies brighter the L∗. It is legitimate to ask whether these galaxies have non-physical parameters and whether their position in the diagram is due to a bad fit with the models. Fig. 7 shows the fit between the observed fluxes of the 9 galaxies that most exceed L∗ and the best fit fluxes from the photometric redshift program. In all cases the fit is excellent, therefore, their position in the diagram is not due to a bad fit. Table 3 gives a summary of the properties of the nine sources. Although all but one galaxy has the luminosity of a Luminous InfraRed Galaxy (LIRG), the low extinction does not re-emit a large enough fraction of the luminosity to put them in that category. All but 2 galaxies fall in the top 50 most luminous galaxies in the field but none of them are in the top 10. This leads to the conclusion that the physical properties of the galaxies are realistic and that there is no reason to exclude them as legitimate sources based on non-physical parameters. Note that 398.0 and 410.0 are probably two parts of the same galaxy. Their photometric redshifts of 3.04 and 2.96 are similar but not exactly the same. The spectroscopic redshift for the the galaxy is 2.799, close to the photometric redshift. The spectroscopic redshift is the redshift used in calculating the luminosity for source 410. If the spectroscopic redshift for source 410 is also the proper redshift for source 398, the 398 luminosity should be reduced by a factor of 0.74. There are three sources without equivalent WFPC2 identifications. Source 398 is an extension of source 410 identified as WFPC2 4-555.1. The closest WFPC2 source to 398 is actually 4-555.11 which is 0.32′′ away, just beyond our association radius of 0.3′′. Similarly the closest WFPC sources for 1630 and 1636 are 3-367.0 (0.33′′) and 3-839 (0.40′′). Although not listed in Table 2,the identifications are listed in Table 3 since inspection of the images clearly indicates that they are the proper associations. It is often the case that the F160W center of a galaxy is offset from the optical position. The F160W position is more representative of the underlying stellar distribution while the optical position measures rest frame UV star formation activity. 6. Determination of the Star Formation Rates As in TWS the SFR is determined from the broad band 1500 A flux relation given by Madau, Pozzetti & Dickinson (1998). UV1500 = 8.0 × 1027 · SF R(M⊙/yr) ergs second−1 Hz−1 (3) -- 19 -- Fig. 7. -- The best fit fluxes matched to the observed fluxes for 9 galaxies that are significantly brighter than the L* galaxy line. Luminosities are given in L⊙. -- 20 -- The value of the UV flux is determined from the 1500 A flux of the unextincted template found in the χ2 analysis averaged over a 200 A band centered on 1500 A. The reshift and the normalization factor A (equation 2) set the absolute 1500 A flux. This procedure provides the extinction corrected 1500 A flux for the SFR calculation. It is obviously a simplification to assume a single extinction for a whole galaxy but it is clearly better than assuming a single average extinction for all galaxies or no extinction at all. A much more extensive discussion of the extinction is presented in TWS and it is not repeated here. Rather than using the isophotal or total flux values returned by SE, the flux in each band is computed as the sum of the flux from each pixel that the Szalay procedure and SE determine is part of an object. The SFR computed with the A value determined from the 0.6′′ aperture is then multiplied by the ratio of the total flux to the aperture flux to give the values reported in Table 2. The sum of the SFRs in Table 2 gives the observed SFR in the appropriate redshift bins. At high redshift the observed SFR is significantly below the actual SFR due to surface brightness dimming. The correction for this effect, using the extinction corrected star formation rate per pixel is described in § 7. 7. Correction for Surface Brightness Dimming It is well known that surface brightness dimming at high redshifts limits the number as well as the extent of galaxies that are detected, creating errors in the measured SFR. In TWS we used the star formation intensity distribution function (Lanzetta et al. 1999) to correct for star formation missed due to surface brightness dimming. Lanzetta et al. (2002) has also used the distribution to correct for missed star formation but did not use a distribution derived from extinction corrected UV fluxes. 7.1. Star Formation Intensity Distribution Function The star formation intensity x is defined as the SFR in solar masses per year per proper square kiloparsec. The intensity is calculated for each pixel that is part of a galaxy. Within a given redshift interval the distribution function, h(x), is defined as the sum of all the proper areas in a interval of specific intensity, divided by the interval and by the comoving volume in cubic megaparsecs defined by the field and redshift interval (Lanzetta et al. 1999). Defined in this manner the values of h(x) determine the star formation rate per cubic comoving megaparsec through equation(4). -- 21 -- sf r =Z ∞ 0 xh(x)dx (4) The distribution functions for both extinction corrected and uncorrected star formation intensities are shown in Figure 8. -- 22 -- Fig. 8. -- Plots of the SFR intensity distribution for the Northern HDF. The abscissa is -- 23 -- The top panels of Figure 8 show the 3 point smoothed fit to both the extinction corrected and uncorrected distribution function at a redshift of 1. At higher redshifts the smoothed curve is matched to the high intensity portion of the distribution by simply moving the smoothed distribution up or down in the log-log plot. It is clear that the smoothed curve for the uncorrected distribution does not match well at higher redshifts. This is discussed further in § 7.3 but for now we will concentrate only on the extinction corrected distribution. The deviation of the observed data from the smoothed distribution in the lower panels shows the effect of surface brightness dimming. As in TWS we correct for surface brightness dimming by integrating equation(4) over the observed data where the smoothed function matches the data and then over the smoothed function (adjusted in height) when the ob- servations fall below the curve. Note that the integral reaches 59% of its total value at log x = −0.25 and 94% of its total value at log x = −1.25. § 7.3 discusses the validity of the correction. Table 4 shows the SFR at each stage of correction. The second column gives the rate with no correction for either extinction or surface brightness dimming. The third column shows the SFR after correction for extinction only and the fourth column shows the SFR after correction for both extinction and surface brightness dimming. At low redshifts extinction is the dominant correction while at high redshifts extinction and surface brightness dimming are comparable. All of the calculations without extinction correction are made from the output of the χ2 photometric redshift program with the extinction held to zero. In some cases this alters the photometric redshift since the degree of freedom to redden a galaxy by extinction is removed. This is the cause of the odd case at redshift 4 where the extinction corrected SFR is less than the uncorrected SFR. 7.2. Selection Function Lanzetta et al. (2002) introduced the concept of a selection function in conjunction with the star formation intensity distribution function h(x). The selection function is the angular area over which a parameter at a given depth can be detected. The maximum angular area is the total area of the observation. At some depth of a parameter such as flux, the area goes to zero when it becomes undetectable. The parameter used in (Lanzetta et al. 2002) and here is the star formation intensity x. The main reason for introducing this concept is the variance in sensitivity of the NICMOS Camera 3 in different regions of the detector. The sensitivity varies by a factor of 3 from maximum to minimum. The star formation intensity is a function of redshift, SED, extinction, and flux, there- -- 24 -- fore, each pixel included in h(x) at a specific x may have a different selection function depending on the values of the parameters. Given the criterion of 3.5 sigma detection in a flux band for 3 contiguous pixels the selection function determines for each source pixel the percentage of the field area where the source could be detected. The star formation intensity distribution function program then corrects the area of each pixel by the inverse of the selection function. The maximum allowed correction is a factor of 10 to prevent marginal detections from dominating the distribution function. In practice only a small percentage of pixels have selection functions less than 100%. 7.3. Validity of the Distribution and Comparison With Other Work Initially in TWS the star formation intensity distribution was treated strictly empirically with no physical motivation. The identical match of the smoothed distribution derived here from largely independent data is further empirical confirmation of the distribution as is the excellent match at high SFR intensities at higher redshifts. Thompson (2002), however, provides a physical motivation by showing that the distribution is a natural consequence of the Schmidt law, the majority of star formation in occurring in exponential disks, and a Schechter distribution of galaxy masses. It also showed that effects of a smaller characteristic mass and a smaller average radius of the exponential disk at higher redshift have opposite effects on the shape of the distribution leading to a generally invariant distribution. Although we lack detailed knowledge of the changes of characteristic mass and exponential disk radius with redshift, the assumption of an invariant distribution appears to be justified. Even if the surface brightness dimming corrections in Table 4 varied by 30% the error would be small compared to the errors from other effects such as photometric error and large scale structure. Lanzetta et al. (2002) also utilized the star formation intensity distribution function to correct for surface brightness dimming but found a SFR that steadily increases from the present day to high values at a redshift of 8, in contrast to the essentially steady star formation rate between a redshift of 1 and 6 as presented in § 8. Only the SFR in the common ground of redshifts will be discussed in the following comments. The comparison will be with the rates found from scaling the h(x) distribution vertically in Lanzetta et al. (2002) since that is the technique used in this paper. The critical difference between the technique applied here versus Lanzetta et al. (2002) (2002) is that this work uses the extinction corrected distribution where as Lanzetta et al. (2002) refer to use the distribution that is uncorrected for extinction. Lanzetta et al. this rate as the unobscured rate. At a redshift of 1 they find a SFR of 0.03M⊙ per Mpc−3 whereas the value in this work is 0.3M⊙ per Mpc−3. This is simply understood as the -- 25 -- difference between correcting for extinction and not correcting for extinction. At a redshift of 4 Lanzetta et al. (2002) find a rate of 0.25M⊙ per Mpc−3 comparable to our value of 0.1. At a redshift of 6 they find a value of 0.45 compared to our value of 0.2. The difference between our relatively steady values and their increasing values is due to two effects. As can be seen from Figure 8 and Lanzetta et al. (2002) the bright end of the distribution has a steeper slope in the uncorrected for extinction case than the corrected one. This is due to extinction removing intrinsically bright pixels from the distribution. Second at higher redshifts the average extinction of the sample becomes smaller due to surface brightness dimming removing the highly extincted galaxies from the sample. Matching the steep slope of the uncorrected distribution function to the continuously lower extinction sample at higher redshifts results in an over correction and an apparent steadily increasing star formation rate. Figure 8 shows this effect. The dimming correction in the right hand column is significantly higher than in the left hand extinction corrected column. 8. Star Formation History Initial work on the star formation history of the universe by (Madau et al. 1996) showed a sharp rise in SFR from the present day to a peak at z between 1 and 2 then a decline to lower rates at higher redshifts. Later work by Madau, Pozzetti & Dickinson (1998), which applied a small correction for extinction, showed a shallower decline in SFR at high redshifts. Subsequent work by Steidel et al. (1999), Hopkins, Connolly, & Szalay (2000) and TWS gave SFRs that were roughly constant at redshifts higher than 1. This is consistent with the results presented here. The SFR values found in this paper are also consistent with the SFRs found in the sub-millimeter observations of Barger et al. (2000) at redshifts of 1-3 and 3-6. The concordance of results between the various studies is discused in § 11. Figure 9 shows the SFR versus redshift corrected for the surface brightness dimming and the selection function as described in § 7. The redshift binning unit is 1 centered on integer redshifts. The lowest redshift included in the study is 0.5 and the highest is 6.5. The NHDF statistics are not adequate at redshifts below 0.5 to determine an accurate SFR. In that redshift range the number of sources is low and the percentage error in redshift is high, leading to high SFR errors. The accuracy of large area ground based surveys is much greater in this redshift range. Although Figure 6 shows galaxies at redshifts above 6.5 we do not use them in this analysis. -- 26 -- Fig. 9. -- Plots of the extinction and surface brightness dimming corrected SFR as a function of redshift. The solid error bars indicate the photometric errors and the dashed error bars indicate the uncertainty in the global SFR. The SFR from Yan et al. (1999) indicated by the diamond is for star formation in the range between a redshift of 0.8 to 2.0. The SFRs from Barger et al. (2000) are indicated by the crosses and are for redshifts 1-3 and 3-6 with a Λ = 2/3 universe. -- 27 -- 8.1. Star Formation Time History The usual form of the 'Madau Diagram' plots SFR versus redshift since redshift is the measured quantity and is not subject to the choice of cosmology. This form of the diagram can be misleading in terms of when the majority of star formation occurs since there is very little time at high redshifts. A more instructive plot is the star formation rate versus age of the universe. In the era of 'precision cosmology' one can dare to produce such a plot with reasonable assumptions on the cosmology. For ages in the redshift range of 0.5 to 6.5 Figure 10 indicates the measured SFR at ages of the universe between 1.25 and 7.25 gigayears. The non integer age units are dictated by the ends of the redshift range. Within the errors the SFR is roughly constant from an age of the universe between 1 and 7 gigayears at a rate significantly above the present day rate. The trend of the data indicates an increase in the formation rate from 1 gigayear to 7 gigayears but the errors are too large to validate this impression. Note that the binning of the objects is quite different between the SFR versus redshift and versus age of the universe plots. 8.2. Error Analysis The error analysis for this data set was carried out in the same manner as the analysis performed in TWS where there is an extensive discussion of the analysis procedures. Table 5 gives the error sources from number statistics, photometric error and large scale structure. The greatly increased number of sources in this data set has reduced number statistics to a negligible error compared to other error sources. 8.2.1. Photometric Error Propagation Photometric errors can propagate into errors in redshift, extinction, and SED. These in turn create errors in the SFR. As in TWS, the photometric error analysis computes the SFR in each redshift bin for 100 runs of the data with the flux values of each object altered randomly by the gaussian distribution of the flux errors calculated for each object. The flux error is the total flux error which includes both the random and systematic error shown in the denominator of equation 1. Due to the variation of sensitivity across the NICMOS detector, the errors in NICMOS flux are calculated individually for each galaxy. The distribution of SFRs between the runs determines the SFR error level from photometric errors. The solid line photometric error bars in Figure 9 are the 16% and 84% points of the SFR distribution in quadrature with the 17% redshift error discussed in § 4.1. This procedure integrates the -- 28 -- Fig. 10. -- Plots of the extinction and surface brightness dimming corrected SFR as a function of age of the universe for the cosmology indicated in the figure. The solid error bars indicate the photometric errors and the dashed error bars indicate the uncertainty in the global SFR. -- 29 -- photometric error induced redshift, extinction and SED errors into a measured SFR error. The procedure preserves the redshift, extinction, and SED calculated in each run, there- fore, we can plot the individual errors in each parameter as a function of the F160W AB magnitude. Figures 11, 12 and 13 show the histograms of redshift, extinction and template SED errors in F160W AB magnitude bins ranging from 20 to 29 for all of the sources listed in Table 2. In each case the unperturbed value is subtracted from the perturbed value. Note that since the histograms include the more error prone objects in the 0.0-0.5 and 6.6-8.0 redshift ranges they are a conservative measure of the error. The error histograms do not show any significant trend with magnitude. The basic reason is that the systematic part of the error scales with flux so that the perturbations for the strong fluxes are larger than for the weaker fluxes, accurately reflecting the observations. As mentioned in § 4, the 10% systematic error is probably an overestimation so errors at brighter magnitudes may be overestimations. If this is the case the error bars in Figure 9 may be exaggerated. Both the redshift and extinction errors show a trend of being asymmetric around zero error with an over abundance of negative errors showing larger redshifts and extinctions for the unperturbed values than for the perturbed values. Both of these effects indicate larger SFRs for the unperturbed versus the perturbed values. This trend is reflected in the overall SFR errors shown in Figure 9 where the error bars extend further on the low side than the high side for most of the redshift bins. 8.2.2. Large Scale Structure Error As in TWS the two-point correlation function ξ(ro, γ) = (ro/r)γ as given by Peebles (1980) is used to calculate the large scale structure error. The fractional error is taken as σN /N where and σN /N =p1 + N × I2/√N I2 =Z Z ξ(ro, γ)dV1dV2/V 2 (5) (6) For each redshift bin it is a very good approximation to consider the volume as a long thin tube of square cross section with sides of (comoving) dimension D and (comoving) length -- 30 -- Fig. 11. -- The redshift error histograms for all sources in Table 2. Negative values indicate that the unperturbed redshift is higher than the perturbed redshift. -- 31 -- Fig. 12. -- The E(B-V) error histograms for all sources in Table 2. Negative values indicate that the unperturbed extinction is higher than the perturbed extinction. -- 32 -- Fig. 13. -- The template number error histograms for all sources in Table 2. Negative values indicate that the unperturbed template SED is later than the perturbed SED. Template numbers run from 1, the earliest, to 6, the latest in increments of 0.1 -- 33 -- L. Then the expression for I2 has the form I2 ≃ C(γ) × (ro/D)γ × (D/L) (7) The quantity L/D is simply the number of cubes of dimension D × D × D that can be placed end to end in the tube of length L. The dimensionless coefficient C(γ) is a double integral in which dV1 is taken over the unit cube and dV2 covers that same cube plus a large number of cubes on either side of this unit cube. We have evaluated this coefficient numerically which is vastly simplified by the large number of symmetries in this geometry. (1998) we adopt γ = 1.8 and ro = 5h−1 Mpc and find From the work of Adelberger et al. C(γ = 1.8) = 8.22. We use the value of D and L for our adopted cosmology appropriate to the center of each bin. The calculation was made for a square field equal to one WFPC2 chip and then the errors for the three fields were added in quadrature. The larger field and the increased photometric error means that large scale structure is no longer the dominant but still an important error in extrapolating the SFR history in the NHDF to the SFR history of the universe. The dashed error bars in Figures 9 and 10 are the quadrature sum of the photometric and large scale structure errors. 9. Magnitude Functions and Comparisons with Predictions Ground based K magnitude functions have provided constraints on galaxy formation models, eg. Kauffmann and Charlot (1998). The much deeper F160W magnitude func- tion determined here provides an even more powerful constraint on theoretical models. A great advantage of this function is that is completely independent of models or cosmology. Figure 14 shows the observed F160W magnitude function for the NHDF. The roll off at magnitudes greater than 28 is due to surface brightness dimming and is not a true feature of the magnitude function. In the range of validity, the magnitude functions from the WFPC2 F814W band (Williams et al. 1996) and the NICMOS F160W band are remarkably similar. Kauffmann and Charlot (1998) proposed two tests to discriminate between hierarchi- cal galaxy formation and pure luminosity evolution (PLE) of galaxies. Both models were constrained to fit the present day K band luminosity function. Since the predictions are for the K band, K band magnitudes were calculated from the observed 1.6 micron flux using the SEDs found by the analysis. Any error in this transformation is very small compared to the differences in the predictions between the hierarchical and PLE models. The first test compares the number density of galaxies versus K magnitude at redshifts of 0.6, 1.0, and 2.0. -- 34 -- Fig. 14. -- The NICMOS F160W (1.6 micron) magnitude function with the WFPC2 0.814 micron magnitude function superimposed. -- 35 -- The PLE model predicts many more bright galaxies at each redshift than do the hierarchical models. Since the predictions only go as faint as a K magnitude of 21.5 the number statistics in the NHDF are small. The PLE model predicts a factor of 10 more bright galaxies than are observed in the NHDF at redshifts of 1 and 2. The hierarchical predictions are within the error bars of the observations. A more decisive test from Kauffmann and Charlot (1998) is their prediction of the rela- tive fraction of galaxies versus redshift in K magnitude bins. Figure 15 shows the predictions and the observations. The first two magnitude bins have 1 and 0 galaxies in the NHDF but the third K 19-21 bin has a significant number of galaxies. It clearly favors the hierarchical model with the data and prediction being virtually indistinguishable. Although the predic- tions end at a K magnitude of 21, the data for fainter magnitudes follows an extrapolation of the hierarchical prediction at those magnitudes. The net results of the two tests are consistent with the hierarchical prediction and inconsistent with the PLE prediction. Our analysis determines the redshift, extinction, and intrinsic SED therefore a combi- nation of the flux, redshift, and SED determines the total luminosity of the galaxy to the accuracy of the individual parameters. The great depth of NHDF observations provides further constraints on galaxy formation models by observing the evolution of the luminosity function with time. Figure 16 shows the luminosity function at 6 different epochs, z = 1-6. The roll off of each curve at low luminosities is simply due to galaxies falling below the detection limit. To observational accuracy, the shapes of the luminosity functions at each epoch appear remarkably similar. The low absolute values for the luminosity function at a redshift of 5 may be due to a void in the NHDF at that redshift. It should be noted that even though the luminosity function appears invariant with red- shift to z = 6, this does not mean that the mass function is also invariant. Very young galaxies at a redshift of 6 require much less mass to achieve the same luminosity as old, present day galaxies. In fact, the invariant luminosity function appears to favor the hierarchical model of galaxy assembly. 10. Infrared and Sub-mm Constraints The observed infrared and sub-mm backgrounds place constraints on the extinction values found in our χ2 analysis. If the extincted luminosity is significantly different from the observed infrared background levels then the extinction values may be considered suspect. A calculated background flux that is much higher than the observed background would indicate an over correction for extinction and a higher SFR than allowed by the infrared and sub-mm -- 36 -- Fig. 15. -- Plots of the relative fraction of galaxies with redshifts greater than z in 7 different magnitude bins. Predictions only exist for the first three bins. The first two bins have only 1 and 0 observed galaxies respectively. -- 37 -- Fig. 16. -- The evolution of the 1.6 micron luminosity function with redshift. -- 38 -- constraints. On the other hand, if the extincted luminosity is much lower than the infrared background levels it would be a sign that our analysis has missed a large part of the highly obscured star formation activity. In addition the calculated sub-mm luminosity of individual sources should not exceed the detections and limits set in the NHDF by Hughes et al. (1998). Note that although comparison with the observed background and emission from individual objects is a constraint on the extinction values, agreement is not a validation of the values. The difference between E(B-V) values of 1 and 2 is a large extinction error but both predict essentially the same amount of re-emitted flux since they both remove almost all of the UV and optical luminosity. Both Calzetti et al. (2000) and Adelberger and Steidel (2000) have explored the errors in transforming between extinctions derived from the optical flux and the observed infrared emission. Calzetti et al. (2000) estimates that the error is a factor of 2 for individual sources which reduces to 20% for a group of about 50 galaxies. Adelberger and Steidel (2000) cite errors of 0.2 - 0.3 dex (1.6 - 2.0) and ascribe the same range in SFR error. The error bars in Figures 9 and 10 are well within these limits, particularly since the points represent hundreds of galaxies rather than individual galaxies. 10.1. Predicted and Observed Backgrounds The fraction of luminosity removed by extinction is easily calculated for each SED from the Calzetti obscuration law. This luminosity is assigned to a dust emission SED. Dust SEDs vary significantly (Rigopoulou et al. 1999) but there is no easy way to predict which SED is appropriate from just the optical and near-IR observations. For consistency a single dust SED is used from Figure 1 of Aussel et al. (1999) for the PAH features joined with the Arp 220 ULIRG spectrum given in Figure 4 of Rowan-Robinson and Efstathiou (1993). The SCUBA 850 µm flux as well as the ISO 6 and 15 µm fluxes listed in Table 2 are calculated from the SED, E(B-V), redshift and luminosity. Integration of all of the predicted 850 µm fluxes gives a 850 µm background of 3.9×10−10 watts m−2 steradian−1. The 850 µm flux is consistent with the value of 5 ± 2 × 10−10 from Blain et al. (1999) and 4 × 10−10 for COBE (Fixsen et al. 1998). The agreement with the probably more accurate COBE flux is remarkable but it should be interpreted only that the predicted sub-mm flux does not indicate an error in the derived parameters Integration of the observed 1.6 µm fluxes gives a 1.6 µm discrete source background of 7.0 × 10−9 watts m−2 steradian−1. The previous 1.6 µm background in the Deep NICMOS NHDF from TWS was 6 × 10−9. The F160W background found here is significantly less -- 39 -- than the J (54 × 10−9) and K (27.8 × 10−9) backgrounds found by Cambresy et al. (2001). It is also less than but closer to the K band background of 12.4 × 10−9 found by Wright and Reese (2000). Our background subtraction technique will remove any component of the true background not due to detected discrete sources. 10.2. Individual Sources Although it is not the primary purpose of the infrared flux calculation, the calculated fluxes of individual sources can be compared with observations and observational limits. 10.2.1. ULIRGs We define an Ultra Luminous Infrared Galaxy (ULIRG) as a galaxy with greater than 1012 L⊙ total luminosity with half or greater of the luminosity emitted in the mid and far infrared. One of the surprising aspects of TWS was the observation of two ULIRGs in the small 50′′x50′′ field of the Deep NICMOS observations. They are sources 439 and 800 in the present catalog. Source 800 retains it ULIRG status in this analysis. Source 800 may also contain an AGN component. Although not listed in their detection catalog, the Chandra X-Ray map of (Brandt et al. 2001b) clearly shows a source at the position of source 800. Source 439 (166 in TWS), however, falls to LIRG status with a luminosity of 1.95× 1011 L⊙. The primary reason is that the best fit in this analysis is a template 5.7 and E(B-V) = 0.5 fit as compared to a template 5.9 and E(B-V) = 1.0 fit in TWS. Although the differences in predicted fluxes is small, the luminosity difference between the two fits is large. Given the higher signal to noise, the parameters found in TWS are more likely correct. There are two very high redshift galaxies, 22 and 396, with ULIRG level luminosities but their redshifts of 8.0 and 7.44 put them beyond the galaxies considered in this paper. The validity of these source will be left to another study. An additional two candidates included in this analysis are sources 475 and 1364 at redshifts of 6.24 and 4.88 respectively. These do not correspond to any WFPC2 NHDF source and are both outside of the field of the Deep NICMOS image. Source 1364 has a small amount of F814W flux while 475 has no detectable flux in any of the optical bands. Both galaxies have significant F110W and F160W fluxes with very red F160W-F110W colors. The χ2 plots show two very broad minima at redshifts between 1 and 2 and at the higher redshifts where the fit is the best. Both of the high redshift minima are extremely broad, covering a redshift range of approximately 2 around the selected redshift. Given the nature of the χ2 distribution, the ULIRG status of these -- 40 -- sources is extremely uncertain. With no reliable detection of additional ULIRGs in this study we can throw no light on the question of whether ULIRGs were much more prevalent in the past, reaching a peak near a redshift of two. If the two possible ULIRGs above were at a redshift of 2 rather than their high redshifts, their luminosities would be considerably sub-ULIRG. The existence of any ULIRGs in the area of the NHDF is still highly improbable, however, given the local space density of ULIRGs. Resolution of this question will require deep imaging in additional fields. 10.2.2. SCUBA Sources Probably the most enigmatic sources in the NHDF are the sub-mm sources detected by SCUBA (Hughes et al. 1998). Of the 5 detected HDF sources, source 2 actually lies just outside of the NHDF field and source 3 is in the PC chip which was not analyzed in this work. The remaining sources 1, 4, and 5 are discussed below. VLA observations by Downes et al. (1999) indicate that the galaxy corresponding to HDF850.1 is either WFPC2 3-586 or 3-593 if it is associated with an optically visible galaxy. It could also be an optically obscured galaxy lying between the two galaxies. Examination of the F160W image does not reveal an optically undetected galaxy lying between the sources, however, the images of the two galaxies slightly overlap at a level below the threshold set for positive detection in § 3. WFPC2 3-586 corresponds to source 1247 in Table 2. It is an elliptical galaxy (Template 1.2) with no detected extinction at a redshift of 0.88. The luminosity is 1.5 × 1010 L⊙ and it is an unlikely candidate for HDF850.1. WFPC2 3-593.0 and 3-593.2 correspond to source 1212 in Table 2. This is a very late galaxy (Template 6.0) with an E(B-V) of 0.4 at a redshift of 1.84. It has a luminosity of 1.76× 1011 but the predicted 850 µm flux is only 0.16 mJy, below the detected flux of 7 mJy. This is a case where the available parameter space of the analysis may have been inadequate to identify this object as the SCUBA source. The analysis picked the hottest SED with a relatively high E(B-V). If an even hotter SED were available it might have given a better fit with a correspondingly higher E(B-V). The combination of the hotter SED and higher E(B-V) could dramaticly increase the expected 850 µm flux. Of the two visible sources 3-593 (1212) is by far the better candidate for HDF850.1. An alternative source is 1277 which lies closer than 1′′ to the position of HDF850.1 given by Hughes et al. (1998). It is barely visible in the F814W band but is a strong source in the F110W and F160W bands. It is a high redshift object (z = 4.8) with a extinction of E(B-V) -- 41 -- = 0.3 and a very late template of 5.9. Source 1277 has a luminosity of 1.49 × 1011 L⊙ and a predicted 850 µm flux of 0.125 mJy which is also below the observed flux. The location of the VLA source however makes this identification much less likely. Dunlop et al. (2002) have proposed an identification of HDF850.1 as a source located between 3-586.0 and 3-593.1 that is only visible after subtraction of 3-586 in ground based K band images. They also quote a possible detection after subtraction in the F160W images used here. In this scenario the flux of the sub-mm source is lensed with an amplification factor of 3. If this is the true source, it has been missed in the analysis performed here and would only be visible through special processing which is beyond the scope of this paper. HDF850.4 and HDF850.5 lie very close to each other with a separation of about 12′′. The sources are in fact blended and must be deconvolved (Serjeant et al. 2002). The only nearby source with strong calculated 850 µm flux is source 1108 which lies almost midway between the sources. Its calculated 850 µm flux is 1.36 mJy close to the observed fluxes of 2.3 mJy and 2.1 mJy for HDF850.4 and HDF850.5. The source has a spectroscopic redshift of 0.19, an E(B-V) of 0.6 and a luminosity of 1.55 × 1011L⊙. If the shift in position for HDF850.1 to lie on top of 3-593 is applied to HDF850.4 and HDF850.5, HDF850.5 would be within 4′′ of 1108. In this case sources 896 and 905 could be identified with HDF850.4. Their combined predicted flux is equal to 0.89 mJy which is near to the observed flux of 2.3 mJy for HDF850.4. If the stated detection limit of 2 mJy is taken for the SCUBA observations in the NHDF (Hughes et al. 1998) there is one source in Table 2 that has a predicted 850 µm flux above the limit but was not detected by the SCUBA observations. The source is the ULIRG, source 800, discussed in § 10.2.1. It corresponds to source 277.211 in TWS where its flux was predicted to be 1.5 mJy rather the 3.46 mJy found here. The present analysis found the same redshift, E(B-V) and template as TWS, but the observed F110W and F160W magnitudes were brighter. If the ULIRG contains a AGN component, as is indicated by the x-ray component, the variation might be real but is of surprising magnitude. VLA 3651+1221 (1999) observed a second source, VLA 3651+1221, very near the elliptical Downes et al. galaxy 3-659.1 which is source 1193 in Table 2. The F160W image shown in Figure 17 clearly shows a strong source at the position of the VLA detection that is very faint or absent in the F814W image. It is clearly a very red source. The correspondence was first noticed by Dickinson et al (2000) who claim that this is the second reddest source in the NHDF. Papovich, Dickinson and Ferguson (2001) point out that the object is also an x-ray source -- 42 -- (Hornschemeier et al. 2000; Brandt et al. 2001a) and therefore probably an AGN. The SE source extraction program linked the source with the elliptical galaxy in producing Table 2, which resulted in an identification of a very late galaxy with a high extinction. This is clearly an artifact of the superposition of fluxes from two very different types of galaxies. 11. Concordance of Star Formation Rates There has been significant debate (Barger et al. 2000; Blain et al. 1999) on whether optically based studies miss the majority of the star formation in the universe because it is hidden in highly obscured galaxies. The SFRs in Figure 9 for the optical, optical plus near infrared, and submillimeter, however, are all in agreement. On the face of it this would seem to indicate that there is no large missing component of star formation. On the other hand the agreement may be fortuitous or the definitions may be misleading. This section examines the various studies to see what is missing and how the agreement has been achieved. The only inconsistent measurements in Figure 9 are the measurements of Madau (1999) which show a fall off of star formation at a redshift of 4 and generally lower SFR at all redshifts. The SFRs in Madau (1999) are derived from the numbers presented in Madau, Pozzetti & Dickinson (1998), (note erroneous reference in Madau (1999)) which do not appear to be corrected for surface brightness dimming. The lack of dimming correction appears to be the principal reason for the fall off at high redshifts. The average extinction correction in Madau (1999) is A1500 = 1.2, which is an underestimate according to this work and accounts for the lower values at redshifts 1 to 2. The extinction corrected SFRs at redshifts 3 and 4 from Steidel et al. (1999), cor- rected for the cosmology adopted here, are coincident with the SFRs found in this work. The extinction corrected values were found by multiplying the uncorrected SFRs by 4.7, corresponding to an E(B-V) = 0.15 (Steidel et al. 1999). The extinction correction value in Steidel et al. (1999) is well motivated and is interpreted there as the proper correction to the UV flux from observed galaxies in the study. It could also be interpreted as a lower E(B-V) correction to the observed galaxies plus a factor that accounts for galaxies not observed due to very high extinction. Without determining an extinction for each galaxy in the sample it is not possible to separate the two interpretations. It still leaves the possibility that the actual average extinction to the observed galaxies is less than E(B-V)= 0.15 and that there are other undetected galaxies that contribute to the SFRs observed by Barger et al. (2000). Note that the comparison with the Steidel et al. (2000) Figure 11 is to the uncorrected rate and a Λ = 0 universe. (1999) in Barger et al. -- 43 -- Fig. 17. -- The extremely red object associated with VLA 3651+1221. -- 44 -- The SFRs in this work are both extinction corrected on an individual galaxy basis and corrected for surface brightness dimming. The extinction correction at redshifts 2 and 4 are 4.9 and 6.1, near the range of the Steidel et al. (1999) correction. The surface brightness dimming corrections are 2.0 in both cases, therefore, the extinction correction is the dominant correction rather than galaxies or parts of galaxies undetected due to surface brightness dimming. This would appear to indicate that the observed sub-mm SFR can be accounted for by galaxies that are observable in deep HST optical and near infrared observations if not necessarily optical ground based observations. It can also be argued that the present work has been unsuccessful in identifying the 3 observed sub-mm sources in the fields of the 3 WF chips. There is no doubt that there can be luminous galaxies that are so highly extincted that even deep HST observations will miss them. At a redshift of 3 the F160W NICMOS band is measuring the 4000 A flux which can be severely extincted. It is also possible that the optical depth that can be reached with the F160W filter is less than the total optical depth of the galaxy so that the present analysis determines a lower luminosity and extinction than is actually present in the galaxy. Another possibility is that the assumed dust SED is not appropriate for the bright sub-mm sources. The luminosity in the 850 µm SCUBA band is a small fraction of the total dust luminosity, therefore, small changes in the dust SED can greatly change the 850 µm luminosity without significantly affecting the total dust luminosity. Perhaps the bright sub-mm sources have colder dust SEDs than the Arp 220 dust SED used here. The bottom line is that on an individual source level there are many uncertainties that can lead to erroneous sub-mm predictions in the present analysis. It should be noted, however, that the sub-mm predictions are only intended to serve as a check on the total sub-mm power not as a individual source predictor. In assessing the effect of underpredicting the bright sub-mm sources it should be noted that the correction factor used in Barger et al. (2000) to account for the fainter undetected sources is a factor of 11,therefore, the bright sub-mm sources account for less than 10% of the SFR. Based on the size of the correction it might be argued that the majority of star formation is also missed by the sub-mm observations. The correction to the sub-mm observations depends on the assumed luminosity function whereas the correction to the optical and near IR observations depends on the assumed extinction law. Even if all of the observed sub-mm sources are missed by optical and near-IR studies, the error in the SFR is small. It can be argued that at the depth of the HST observations only the most obscured sources are missed and that the bulk of the galaxies that produce the sub-mm emission and the majority of the SFR are detected and on the average properly accounted for. Within the caveats discussed above it appears that although some of the extreme sub-mm sources are missed by the optical and near infrared observations, the total SFR derived from optical, -- 45 -- optical and near infrared, and sub-mm observations are in agreement indicating that the majority of the SFR is accounted for in the three types of observations. All of these methods however, have correction factors on the order of a factor of 10 based on assumptions that still need to be confirmed. 12. Summary Analysis of HST archival data from WFPC2 and NICMOS in the NHDF yields photo- metric redshifts, extinctions and SEDs for almost 2000 galaxies. From this data the extinc- tion corrected SFR for each galaxy was determined. After correction for surface brightness dimming and the variable sensitivity over the NICMOS detector arrays, the star formation history of the NHDF from a redshift 1 to 6 shows a roughly constant SFR. Optical studies of Lyman break galaxies and sub-mm observations produce SFRs that are consistent with the results in this study. The sub-mm background predicted from our analysis is consistent with the observed background, indicating that the analysis has not missed a significant star forming component due to high extinction. The inability to accurately predict the fluxes and locations of the observed NHDF sub-mm sources does indicate that some bright sub-mm sources are certainly missed by this work but that these are not the sources that contribute the majority of star formation in the field. 13. Acknowledgements The author would like to acknowledge the significant contributions to this work by Ray Weymann and Lisa Storrie-Lombardi in the initial data reduction and analysis as well as their contributions in establishing the methodology which was carried over from TWS. The author would also like to thank Mark Dickinson and all of his group who planned and executed the NICMOS observations of the entire Northern HDF in a General Observer program. This work is supported in part by NASA grant NAG 5-10843. This article is based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy under NASA contract NAS5-26555. -- 46 -- REFERENCES Adelberger, K. L., Steidel, C. C., Giavalisco, M., Dickinson, M., Pettini, M., & Kellogg, M. 1998, ApJ, 505, 18 Adelberger, K. L. & Steidel, C. C. 2000, ApJ, 544, 218 Aussel, H., et al. 1999, a, 342, 313 Barger, A.J., Cowie, L.L., & Richards, E.A. 2000, AJ, 119, 2092 Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&A, 117, 393 Blain et al. 1999, ApJ, 512, L87 Brandt, W. M., et al. 2001, AJ, 112, 1 Brandt, W. M., et al. 20001, AJ, 122, 2801 Bruzual, G. and Charlot, S. 1996, GISSEL96 Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582 Calzetti, D. 1999 Private communication of digital data. Calzetti, D. 1997, AJ, 113, 162 Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R.C., Kinney, A.L., Koornneef, J., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1999,ApJ, 533, 682 Calzetti et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682 Cambresy, L. et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 563 Cohen, J.G., Hogg, D.W., Blandford, R.,Cowie, L.L., Hu, E., Songaila, A., Shopbell, P., & Richberg, K. 2000, ApJ, 538, 29 Cohen, J.G. 2001, AJ, 121, 2895 Coleman, G.D., Wu, C-C, & Weedman, D.W., 1980 ApJS, 43, 393 Dickinson, M. 2000, Phil.Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. A., 358, 2001 Dickinson M. et al. 2000, ApJ, 531, 624 Downes, D. et al. 1999, A&A, 347, 809 -- 47 -- Dunlop, J. S. et al. 2002, astro-ph/0205489 Fern´andez-Soto, A., Lanzetta, K.M., & Yahil, A. 1999, ApJ, 513, 34 Fixsen et al. 1998, ApJ, 508, 123 Hopkins, A. M., Connolly, A.J., & Szalay, A. S. 2000, AJ, 120, 2843 Hornschemeier, A. E., et al. 2000, ApJ, 541, 49 Hughes, D., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 241 Kauffmann, G. & Charlot, S. 1998, MNRAS, 297, L23 Lanzetta, K.M., Yahata, N., Pascarelle, S., Chen, H.-W. & Fern´andez-Soto, A. 2002, ApJ, 570, 492 Lanzetta, K.M., Chen, H-W., Fernandez-Soto, A., Pascarelle, S., Puetter, R., Yahata, N., and Yahil, A. 1999, ASP Conf. Ser. 191, Photometric Redshifts and High Redshift Galaxies, ed. R. J. Weymann, L.J. Storrie-Lombardi, M. Sawicki, and R. J. Brunner, (San Francisco ASP), 223. Lanzetta, K.M., Yahil,A., & Fern´andez-Soto, A. 1996, Nature, 381, 759 Lilly, S. J., Le F`evre O., Hammer, F., & Crampton, D. 1996, ApJ, 460, L1 Lytle, D., Stobie, E., Ferro, A. & Barg, I. 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 172, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VIII, ed. D. Mehringer, R. Plante, & D. Roberts, (San Francisco; ASP), 445 Madau, P., Ferguson, H.C., Dickinson, M. E.,Giavalisco, M., Steidel, C. C. & Fruchter, A. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 1388 Madau, P., Pozzetti, L., & Dickinson, M. 1998, ApJ, 498, 106 Madau, P. 1999, AIP Conference Proceedings 470, After the Dark Ages: When Galaxies were Young (The Universe at 2 < z < 5), ed. Stephen S. Holt & Eric P. Smith, (Woodbury, New York AIP), 299 Papovich, C., Dickinson, M. & Ferguson, H. C. 2001, ApJ, 559, 620 Peebles, P.J.E. 1980 The Large Scale Structure of the Universe, Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey Rigopoulou, D., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 2645 -- 48 -- Rowan-Robinson, M., & Efstathiou, A. 1993, MNRAS, 263, 675 Serjeant, S. et al. 2002, astro-ph/0201502 Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Giavalisco, M., Dickinson, M., & Pettini, M. 1999, ApJ, 519, 1 Szalay, A.S., Connolly, A.J., & Szokoly, G.P. 1999, AJ, 117, 68 Thompson et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 7 Thompson, R.I., Weymann, R.J. & Storrie-Lombardi, L.J. 2001, ApJ, 546, 694 (TWS) Thompson, R. I., ApJ, 581, L85 Wang,Y., Bachall, N., & Turner, E.L. 1998, AJ, 116, 2081 Williams, R.E. et al. 1996, AJ, 112, 1335 Wright, E.L. & Reese, E.D. 2000, ApJ, 545, 43 Yan, L., McCarthy, P.J., Freudling, W., Teplitz, H.I., Malumuth, E.M., Weymann, R. J., & Malkan, M.A. 1999, ApJ, 519, L47 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0. -- 49 -- Table 1. Galaxies with Redshift Errors Greater than 0.5. ID WFPC-ID Phot. Z Spec. z Template E(B-V) Qual. a Sp. b fail c 6 13 84 108 339 369 524 625 1226 1656 1762 4-916 4-928 4-878 · · · 4-445 · · · 2-251 2-201 2-531 2-982 · · · 0.08 0.48 0.0 1.84 1.84 1.92 0.24 1.84 0.56 0.56 1.12 0.904 1.015 0.892 0.584 2.5 2.801 0.962 1.313 1.087 1.147 0.47 6.0 6.0 3.0 5.2 5.8 5.9 4.3 5.0 5.8 5.7 3.5 0.6 1.0 0.04 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0 0.5 0.4 0.0 9 4 4 3 2 3 6 1 3 1 1 A E E A EA A Q E A E E P P S,P S S · · · · · · S,P F,P F P aThis is the quality of the spectrum as noted in Cohen et al. (2000) where 1 is the highest 11 is the lowest cited in table 2b of that work. bSp is the spectral type listed in Cohen et al. (2000). E is an emission line galaxy, A is an absorption line galaxy, EA is a galaxy displaying both emission and absorption and Q is a broad absorption line galaxy cFail is the probable cause of failure. P is hitting a boundary in parameter space, S is the probable superposition of two galaxies, and F is the problem associated with z = 0.56 discussed in the text. -- 50 -- The remainder of the 1927 table entries are available in the electronic version of the Astrophysical Journal publication. Table 2. Listing of measured quantities NICMOS WFPC z E(B-V) ID ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4-951.0 · · · · · · · · · · · · 4-916.0 4-922.0 4-952.0 4-930.0 4-953.0 0.00 2.88 2.56 2.56 2.80 0.90 3.20 3.52 0.48 2.88 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.60 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.00 SFR M⊙ yr−1 2.831 0.258 0.131 0.691 1.984 0.182 2.937 5.092 0.662 0.587 Lum. L⊙ frac.a 0.00E+00 3.64E+09 2.15E+09 3.94E+09 7.36E+09 6.34E+08 1.18E+10 2.15E+10 2.46E+09 2.62E+09 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.95 0.53 0.51 0.75 0.00 ISO6 6 µm flux mJy 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.16E-06 0.00E+00 1.90E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.63E-04 0.00E+00 ISO15 15 µm flux mJy 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7.82E-06 0.00E+00 1.61E-04 2.10E-05 3.00E-05 1.76E-03 0.00E+00 SCUBA 850 µm flux mJy 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.61E-03 0.00E+00 8.75E-04 6.76E-03 1.29E-02 4.70E-03 0.00E+00 T b 2 χ Tot.c mag Ap.d mag 5.6 3.5 3.3 5.1 5.8 6.0 5.6 5.5 5.8 5.4 3.0 18. 19. 5.6 19. 11. 2.6 4.6 8.1 2.2 26.4 28.2 28.2 28.7 27.1 22.5 27.8 27.4 24.2 27.5 27.4 27.2 27.3 27.2 27.1 24.6 27.7 27.3 25.7 27.9 RA h 12. m 36. 38.23 38.24 38.32 38.32 38.49 38.59 38.60 38.77 38.79 38.83 DEC ◦ +62. 12:28.3 12:31.7 12:34.2 12:32.2 12:35.5 12:33.8 12:29.1 12:18.8 12:25.9 12:17.9 aThis is the fraction of the luminosity removed by extinction and re-emitted in the mid and far infrared bThe selected template number between 1.0 (early-cold) and 6.0 (late-hot). cThe total AB magnitude in the F160W filter. dThe F160W magnitude in an 0.6′′ diameter aperture. -- 5 1 -- -- 52 -- Table 3. Properties of galaxies with F160W magnitudes significantly brighter than predicted L* magnitudes. ID WFPC-ID Redshift F160W AB mag. E(B-V) Template Lum. 1636.0 398.0 410.0 81.0 1604.0 1630.0 1409.0 1179.0 812.0 3-839.0 4-555.11 4-555.1 4-713 3-82 3-367 2-591 2-578 4-169 5.2 3.04 2.799 4.08 4.32 4.48 2.96 3.92 5.04 23.8 24.4 23.8 23.6 24.3 24.8 24.4 25.0 25.2 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.10 5.1 5.6 5.7 3.9 3.6 3.5 5.2 5.2 3.9 5.72E11 2.7E11 6.09E11 4.96E11 6.5E11 3.66E11 8.84E10 1.09E11 3.38E11 -- 53 -- Table 4. SFR corrections for extinction and surface brightness dimming z Uncor. Ext. Cor. Ext.& Dim. % Lum. a Missing Cor. SFR SFR SFR 1 2 3 4 5 6 6.8E-3 3.7E-2 5.0E-2 1.0E-1 1.8E-2 3.5E-2 2.8E-1 1.8E-1 8.9E-2 6.1E-1 6.5E-2 8.1E-2 2.8E-1 3.7E-1 9.6E-2 1.2E-1 2.3E-1 3.0E-1 0% 50% 8% 50% 72% 73% aThis is the percentage of missed luminosity be- tween the extinction corrected SFR and the extinc- tion corrected SFR also corrected for surface bright- ness dimming. -- 54 -- Table 5. Sources of Numerical Variances Statistic z = 1 z = 2 z = 3 z = 4 z = 5 z = 6 Number of Sources 1/√N I2 σN /N 16% Confidence fraction 84% Confidence fraction 495 0.045 0.16 0.09 0.47 0.37 370 0.052 0.11 0.11 0.48 0.21 339 0.058 0.13 0.13 0.21 0.69 160 0.079 0.16 0.16 0.27 1.2 45 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.64 1.1 55 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.82 0.13
astro-ph/0412097	1	0412	2004-12-03T22:36:30	Stars in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field	[ "astro-ph" ]	We identified 46 unresolved source candidates in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, down to i775 = 29.5. Unresolved objects were identified using a parameter S, which measures the deviation from the curve-of-growth of a point source. Extensive testing of this parameter was carried out, including the effects of decreasing signal-to-noise and of the apparent motions of stars, which demonstrated that stars brighter than i775 = 27.0 could be robustly identified. Low resolution grism spectra of the 28 objects brighter than i775 = 27.0 identify 18 M and later stellar type dwarfs, 2 candidate L-dwarfs, 2 QSOs, and 4 white dwarfs. Using the observed population of dwarfs with spectral type M4 or later, we derive a Galactic disk scale height of 400 \pm 100 pc for M and L stars. The local white dwarf density is computed to be as high as (1.1 \pm 0.3) x10^(-2) stars/pc^3. Based on observations taken 73 days apart, we determined that no object in the field has a proper motion larger than 0.027"/year (3 sigma detection limit). No high velocity white dwarfs were identified in the HUDF, and all four candidates appear more likely to be part of the Galactic thick disk. The lack of detected halo white dwarfs implies that, if the dark matter halo is 12 Gyr old, white dwarfs account for less than 10% of the dark matter halo mass.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Stars in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field N. Pirzkal1, K. C. Sahu1, A. Burgasser2, L. A. Moustakas1, C. Xu1, S. Malhotra1, J. E. Rhoads1, A. M. Koekemoer1, E. P. Nelan1, R. A. Windhorst3, N. Panagia1, C. Gronwall4, A. Pasquali5, J. R. Walsh6 ABSTRACT We identified 46 unresolved source candidates in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, down to i775 = 29.5. Unresolved objects were identified using a parameter S, which measures the deviation from the curve-of-growth of a point source. Exten- sive testing of this parameter was carried out, including the effects of decreasing signal-to-noise and of the apparent motions of stars, which demonstrated that stars brighter than i775 = 27.0 could be robustly identified. Low resolution grism spectra of the 28 objects brighter than i775 = 27.0 identify 18 M and later stellar type dwarfs, 2 candidate L-dwarfs, 2 QSOs, and 4 white dwarfs. Using the ob- served population of dwarfs with spectral type M4 or later, we derive a Galactic disk scale height of 400 ±100 pc for M and L stars. The local white dwarf density is computed to be as high as (1.1 ± 0.3) × 10−2 stars/pc3. Based on observations taken 73 days apart, we determined that no object in the field has a proper mo- tion larger than 0.027"/year (3σ detection limit). No high velocity white dwarfs were identified in the HUDF, and all four candidates appear more likely to be part of the Galactic thick disk. The lack of detected halo white dwarfs implies that, if the dark matter halo is 12 Gyr old, white dwarfs account for less than 10% of the dark matter halo mass. Subject headings: Galaxy: stellar content, Galaxy: structure, Galaxy: disk, white dwarfs, stars: late-type 1Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD21218, USA 2Department of Astrophysics, Division of Physical Sciences, American Museum of Natural History, Cen- tral Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA; [email protected] 3Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Arizona State University, Street: Tyler Mall PSF-470, P.O. Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504, USA 4Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory, Uni- versity Park, PA 16802 5Institute of Astronomy, ETH Honggerberg, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland 6ESO/ST-ECF, Karl-Schwarschild-Strasse 2, D-85748, Garching bei Munchen, Germany -- 2 -- 1. Introduction Studying the stellar content of our galaxy down to the faintest possible magnitudes is necessary to study the structures of the Galactic disk and population II halo (referred to as Galactic halo thereafter) and stellar population (M´endez et al. 1996). The nature of the Galactic dark matter halo has in addition been the subject of some debate since the MACHO project (Alcock et al. 2000) observed lensing events in the direction of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and claimed that 20% of the dark matter halo mass could be in the form of low mass objects with masses smaller than 1.0M⊙ (Alcock et al. 2000). While there are alternative explanations for the observed lensing events (Sahu 1994; Sahu 2003; Gates & Gyuk 2001, and references therein), the detection of faint, blue unresolved objects with high proper motion has been used as evidence for the existence of a large population of old white dwarfs in the Galactic dark matter halo. Oppenheimer et al. (2001) estimated that about 2% of the dark matter halo mass could be accounted for by old halo white dwarfs. There has since been some debate as to whether the former result might have been caused by a dynamically warmer thick disk component (Reid, Sahu & Hawley 2001) and the latter might have been affected by the misidentification of faint blue extra-galactic sources (Kilic et al. (2004), also see Reid (2004) for a complete review). The existence of ultra cool white dwarfs (T 6 4000◦ K) has however been confirmed in recent SLOAN data (Gates et al. 2004). A search for distant white dwarfs using deeper observations provides another opportunity to firmly examine the existence of a significant population of old white dwarfs in the Galactic halo and the dark matter halo. As shown by Kawaler (1996), deep broad band imaging can probe a significant portion of the Galactic dark matter halo and should identify Galactic dark halo white dwarfs in the process. Ideally, one would like to identify white dwarf candi- dates spectroscopically, instead of relying on broadband colors only, and to determine their Galactic disk or halo memberships using sensitive proper motion measurements. The Advanced Camera for Survey (ACS) HST observations of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF, Beckwith et al. 2004) and their unprecedented depths offer a new opportunity to de- tect faint stars, such as white dwarfs, at high galactic latitude. Additionally, the GRAPES survey (GRism ACS Program for Extragalactic Science. PI: Malhotra, see description in Pirzkal et al. 2004) provides low resolution spectra of most sources in the HUDF. These spectra can be used to confidently determine spectral types of stars in the HUDF, down to i775 = 27.0 mag. More importantly, these spectra allow one to differentiate unresolved, blue, faint extra-galactic objects (e.g. QSO) from white dwarfs and other stars. Section 3 outlines how unresolved sources were identified in the HUDF, while the spectro- scopic identification of unresolved sources is discussed in Section 4. Section 5 describes an analysis of the cumulative number distribution of the late-type dwarfs identified in the HUDF and its implication for the Galactic disk structure (Section 5.1). Section 5 also includes a description of the white dwarf content of the Galactic disk and halo (Section 5.2). -- 3 -- 2. Description of the data The HUDF was imaged using the ACS and the F435W (B435), F606W (V606), F775W (i775) and F850LP (z850) bands at different epochs. The observations were carried out by cycling through each filter while using a small dither pattern to mask out the ACS inter-chip gap and other cosmetic problems. The HUDF was observed during 4 different visits, rotating the field of view to a different position angle each time (0◦, 8◦, 85◦, 91◦ with respect to the first visit, Beckwith et al. 2004). The individual ACS images had an integration time of 1200 seconds, a size of 4096x4096 pixels and a pixel scale of 0.050"/pixel. These images were combined together by drizzling them onto a finer pixel grid with a pixel scale of 0.030"/pixel, while geometrically correcting these images. The limiting AB magnitudes (S/N=10) of the i775 and z850 images are 29.0 and 28.7 mag, respectively. In this paper, images taken from 09/24/2003 to 10/28/2003 and from 12/04/2003 to 01/15/2004 are referred to as Epoch 1 and 2 images, respectively. The elapsed time between the mean observing dates of the two epochs is 73 days. Images from Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 were taken at position angles that are nearly 90◦ apart. While the deep, combined ACS HUDF images described above were used to determine which objects are unresolved (Section 3), eight special partial image stacks were also assembled to take advantage of the fact that the data were taken over a period of several months. Four partial image stacks were created for each HUDF Epoch, using the exact same method used to create the original combined HUDF images. These partial image stacks can be used to determine the variability (Cohen et al. 2004) as well as measure the proper and parallax motions of the objects in the field. The eight partial image stacks have the same physical properties as the combined ACS HUDF images but with one eighth of the integration time. Note that the cosmic ray rejection step was done separately while assembling each partial image stack so that any strongly varying or moving object would not be removed by the cosmic ray rejection process. The astrometric registration of the combined HUDF images and the eight partial image stacks is estimated to be better than 0.1 ACS pixel (0.005" or 0.16 HUDF image pixel) (Beckwith et al. 2004). Spectroscopic observations of the UDF using the ACS slitless grism mode (G800L) were carried out as part of the GRAPES project. The reader is referred to Pirzkal et al. (2004) for an in-depth description of these spectra. These spectra are low resolution spectra (R=100), span a wavelength range of 5500A 6 λ 6 10500A, and can be used to spectroscopically identify objects in the field. The HUDF Public Catalog 1.0, containing 10181 objects, was used to identify objects in the -- 4 -- field and all objects are referred to by their ID in this catalog (UID). The magnitudes of these objects were re-measured using matched aperture photometry with apertures defined using Sextractor (Bertin & Arnouts 1996) and the i775 band HUDF image. The photometric ACS magnitude zero-points (25.65288, 26.49341, 25.64053, 24.84315 in the B435, V606, i775, z850 bands respectively) were taken from the GOODS survey (Giavalisco et al. 2004) . 3. Identification of point sources in the HUDF We identified unresolved objects in the HUDF using a single-index (S) method that is based on a simple analysis of the curve of growth of the light distribution of an object. The IRAF task RADPROF was used to produce these light curves of growth. This task first computes the intensity weighted center of the object (in a 3x3 pixel box), and then performs aperture photometry using increasing aperture sizes (up to a radius of 10 pixels). These photometric measurements are then fit (using eight 3 σ rejection cycles) to a cubic spline of order 5. RADPROF was applied to stamp images of objects which were masked using Sextractor segmentation maps. These segmentation maps were used to avoid contamination from neighboring objects. The RADPROF parameters described here were selected because, following extensive initial testing, they were found to result in curves of growth that are not too sensitive to the presence of faint nearby objects while consistently remaining sensitive to the presence of faint, diffuse extended emission around objects. The stellarity S of an object is defined as rmax S 2 = 1 rrmax (Fobj(r) − Fpsf (r))2 X r=0 where Fobj(r) and Fpsf (r) denote the curve of growth of light, normalized to 1.0 at a distance of rmax, of the object and of a point source. A value of 10. was used for rmax. The index S is then simply the square root of the sum of the squared differences between the two curves. Unresolved objects have S values that are close to 0.0 while increasingly resolved objects produce increasingly larger (unbound) values of S. The detailed calibration of S was done in several stages, each time refining the reference curve of growth that was used. This is described in some detail below. First, a few obvious, bright, unresolved and unsaturated sources were pre-selected for further study. This was done in both the i775 and z850 band images separately. The GRAPES spectra of these sources were examined and a main-sequence star was selected (UID 911). The curves of growth of this object were measured separately in the i775 and z850 bands and were used to compute Si775 and Sz850 values for all 10181 objects in the HUDF. A new set of 25 bright point sources, well distributed over the whole ACS field, were then carefully selected based on -- 5 -- their low Si775 values (arbitrarily chosen to be Sz850 6 0.04). The GRAPES spectra of these 25 objects were visually inspected to ensure that these objects were stars. Stamp images of these objects were individually drizzled (Fruchter & Hook 2002) and carefully re-centered to produce a stack of images which were then combined together to produce empirical i775 and z850 PSF images. A sigma-based rejection algorithm was used to avoid the effect of any faint neighbor in the final combined images. Final i775 and z850 band reference curves of growth were generated using these empirical PSF estimates and all of the Si775 and Sz850 values were re-computed. Figure 1 shows the distributions of the S values in both the i775 and z850 bands, as a function of magnitude. There are clearly two distinct groups of object in the HUDF images: one group consists of object that are completely or partially resolved, forming a large distribution around the S value of 0.2 and i775 = 28.0 mag. A second group consists of unresolved objects with low S values at all magnitudes. Bright stars in Figure 1 are observed to have S values which are consistently lower than 0.05. The exception to this are bright stars near i775 = 18 mag. which are saturated and have artificially high values of S (≈ 0.1) . The effect of bright star saturation on the measured values of S were investigated and values of 0.1 6 S 6 0.15 are expected if the center of a star is saturated or missing in the HUDF images. Nevertheless, the populations of resolved and unresolved objects appear to be well separated at brighter magnitudes in Figure 1. Unresolved sources in the HUDF were selected using the criterion that Si775 6 0.05 mag. Four bright saturated stars were added to the final object list manually. The final list of unresolved UDF sources contains 46 objects, spanning the magnitude ranges of 19.0 6 i775 6 29.5 mag and 18.3 6 z850 6 29.2 mag. Table 1 summarizes some of the properties of these objects. 3.1. Testing the selection process The ability to distinguish between resolved and unresolved objects using S values was extensively tested, using a subset of the HUDF object catalog containing the 369 brightest (z850 6 25.0 mag) objects in the field. Simulated i775 and z850 band images of these objects -- made 0.0, 0.75, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0 magnitudes fainter -- were created and S values measured using each simulated image, exactly as described in Section 3. The S value of each of these 369 test objects was thus measured 10 times, each measurement corresponding to a different apparent magnitude. Figure 2 shows how the S value remains largely unchanged as an object is made fainter and noisier, all the way down to i775 = 29.0 mag. The vertical pattern seen in this figure is a result of the 10 magnitude steps used in this simulation. This test demonstrates a very small fraction of misclassification: not a single extended object was misclassified as a star (e.g. no object with S > 0.05 originally in the HUDF images was measured to have S 6 0.05 as the object was made fainter), and fewer -- 6 -- than 5% of stars were misclassified down to i775 = 29.0 mag. While some objects shown in Table 1 are fainter than this, only objects significantly brighter than this limit (i775 6 27.0 mag) are actually included in the analysis described below and these are expected to be bona fide unresolved objects. 3.2. Testing the effect of proper motion Some of the stars in the HUDF objects could have a high tangential-velocity (Vt) and a correspondingly large proper motion. Such objects would be blurred in the combined HUDF images and would appear to be resolved. Similarly, nearby objects would suffer from a significant amount of parallax, again causing these objects to be blurred and mis-identified. The index S proved relatively insensitive to a small amount of object motion. This is not unexpected since S was tuned to the detection of faint extended components, The curves of growth produced by RADPROF were computed by summing, using several sigma rejection steps, the pixel intensities inside annuli of increasing radii. The effect of a nearby source is strongly diminished as its separation from the main source increases and the number of unaffected pixels increases. In addition, the use of a fifth order spline imposes some smoothness on the curve of growth which further lowers the effect of a nearby object. Still, the effect of object motion on measured values of S was carefully investigated by generating images of the 46 unresolved HUDF objects that were selected as described in Section 3. These were appropriately shift-and-added, accounting for the orientation and pointing used for each individual HUDF observation while allowing objects to move as a function of time, to simulate the effect of proper motion. As larger values of proper motion were introduced, the S values increased only slightly and S was found to be mostly unaffected by shifts smaller than 2.5 HUDF pixel (µ = 0.3 ′′/year). 70% of objects were still properly identified as point sources when shifts 2.5 and 5.0 HUDF pixels were applied (0.3 6 µ 6 0.6). 4. Identifying stars 4.1. Using Grism spectra to identify stars The spectral type of 28 unresolved objects brighter than i775 = 27.0 could be determined robustly using template fitting of their GRAPES spectra (Pirzkal et al. 2004). The template set included Pickles (1998) main-sequence templates, L and T dwarf spectra (Kirkpatrick et al. 2000; Burgasser et al. 2003), DA and DB white dwarf spectra (Harris et al. 2003) obtained from the SDSS archive, and some low temperature (3000◦K, 5000◦K, and 8000◦K) -- 7 -- model spectra of white dwarfs (Harris et al. 2001). The quality of each spectral fit was evaluated visually and the results of these fits are given in Table 2. Objects too faint to have reliable fits are indicated. The GRAPES spectra and the two best-fits listed in Table 2 are shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5. Unresolved extra-galactic sources are labelled as GAL in Table 2 and are discussed in more details in Section 4.3. Of the 46 point sources detected in the HUDF, 26 stars, all brighter than i775 = 27.0 mag were identified. As shown in Table 2, the majority of stars in the HUDF (18 out of 26 ) are found to be M dwarfs. Figures 6 and 7 show these objects in B435 vs. B435-V606 and i775vs. i775-V606 plots. Such plots have in the past shown a lack of faint red objects in the region V606 > 27.0 mag and (B435 − V606) > 1.0 (M´endez et al. 1996). Objects found in this region of the plot, appear to be either extra-galactic or L-type dwarf spectra (UID 443, 366). Further NIR observations will be required to verify the nature of these 2 L-dwarf candidates by confirming that they both have the expected blue NIR colors of this type of object. The HUDF field is at high galactic latitude (b=223◦, l= -- 54◦) and the effects of extinction and reddening are small (AV = 0.026, Schlegel et al. 1998). The distances to the HUDF stars, which are shown in Table 2, were determined using their observed V606 magnitudes, their estimated stellar types, and the dwarf star main-sequence absolute Johnson V magnitudes from Allen (2000). The latter were converted to the V606 filter bandpass and AB magnitudes to be consistent with the data at hand. Distance estimates obtained under the assumption that these objects are white dwarfs with intrinsic magnitudes of Mmv = 14.0 and 17.0 are also given. 4.2. Proper motion measurements The Galactic halo is isotropic and has no or little overall rotation. Halo objects are therefore expected to lag behind the rapidly rotating Galactic disk component (and the local standard of rest) with an average velocity of ≈ 200 ± 100km/s . As done in Oppenheimer et al. (2001), it is assumed here that Galactic halo objects have a velocity that is more than 2σ above the velocity expected for an object that is in the Galactic disk (i.e. > 100 km/s, Chiba et al. 2000). The HUDF image stacks (Section 2) were subtracted from one another and the results were examined to see if any object, whether classified to be extended or not based on its Sz850 value, had moved significantly (e.g. more than 2.5 UDF pixel) from one image to the next. No such object was found. The motion of objects in the HUDF was further investigated by carefully measuring the position of objects separately in each of the eight available i775 band HUDF partial image stacks. These positions were measured using the IDL task MPFIT2DPEAK 7, using a fixed -- 8 -- width (FWHM=2.5 pixel) Gaussian fit. Initially, the positions of the 360 most compact sources (S 6 0.1 and i775 6 28.5 mag) were examined. An average position and a standard deviation of the mean were computed for each object in the field using Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 HUDF image stacks separately. Average Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 positions were subtracted from one another to compute the observed shift of each object. These are shown (scaled up by a factor of 500) in the left panel of Figure 8. Repeated measurements of the position of sources in the field using HUDF image stacks taken within the same Epoch were always within 0.1 HUDF pixel, or 0.003". Still, and as shown in Figure 8, there is a systematic, field dependent disagreement between the Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 measurements. This is likely caused by Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 images having been taken at position angles that are 90◦ apart, and/or the effect of telescope breathing, and/or very small amount of residual image distortion that is not taken into account in the current model of the ACS distortion maps. To produce a 3σ detection with these data, an object must have a measured proper motion larger than 0.54 HUDF pixel or µ > 0.081 ′′/year. No object in Table 1 was observed to have such a large proper motion. The situation was however improved using a simple third order two dimensional polynomial fit to the observed distribution shown in the left panel of Figure 8. This fit, when applied as a correction, results in significantly lower systematics across the field, as shown in the right panel of Figure 8. The accuracy of the corrected shifts (of compact objects) between Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 is improved by a factor of 3, with a 3σ detection now corresponding to a shift of 0.18 HUDF pixel or µ > 0.027 ′′/year. The search for high proper motion objects in the HUDF was extended to all 10181 objects in the field by measuring and correcting (using the correction determined above) the observed shifts of these objects. Only four sources were found to have moved significantly (but with a significance slightly lower than 3σ) from Epoch 1 to Epoch 2. These objects are UID 443, 9020, 911, and 7525 and they are all unresolved objects that are listed in Table 1. Their measured shifts are 0.17, 0.17, 0.14, and 0.15 HUDF pixels respectively, or approximately 0.02"/year, which is smaller than our imposed 3σ limit. 4.3. Extragalactic Unresolved Sources Two unresolved, extra-galactic sources with i775 6 27.0 were identified (UID 6732, 9397). The GRAPES spectrum of these objects show prominent emission lines and the redshift of these objects is estimated to be z=3.2 and z=3.0, respectively (Xu 2004). Identification of such objects using GRAPES spectra could easily be carried out down to magnitudes fainter 7http://astrog.physics.wisc.edu/ craigm/idl/ -- 9 -- than i775=27.0 mag, as demonstrated by the fact that several fainter extragalactic objects with 27.0 6 i775 6 29.5 were easily identified (e.g. UID 4120, 8157). Without spectral information, these objects would have been misidentified as stars (e.g. UID 9397 would be a good candidate for a cool white dwarf at a distance of ≈ 1 Kpc). The issue of contamination by faint, blue extra-galactic objects in previous studies (Ibata et al. 1999; M´endez & Minniti 2000) has been discussed in the past (Kilic et al. 2004) and Figures 6 and 7 illustrate how these objects could be mistaken for a variety of stellar objects ranging from M and L dwarfs to white dwarfs. Spectroscopic confirmation is therefore crucial to accurately determine stellar counts in deep fields such as the HUDF. There are 2 extra-galactic objects amongst the 28 point sources with i775 6 27.0 mag, which corresponds to a 7% contamination level at these Galactic coordinates. The 2 extra-galactic objects (UID 6732, 9397) were used to check the accuracy of the proper motion measurements described in Section 3.2. The measured shifts of these objects between Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 are smaller than 0.04 HUDF pixel (0.0012"), which is what one would expect based on the proper motion error estimate quoted in Section 3.2). There are a total of 14 faint (27.0 6 i775 6 29.5), blue ((B435 −V606) 6 1.8, (V606 −i775) 6 0.8) objects listed in Table 1 that were not included in the analysis above because they are either too faint to have useable GRAPES spectra or robust S based classifications. Some of these sources might well be faint white dwarfs in either the Galactic disk or halo but are hard to distinguish from extra-galactic sources without higher signal-to-noise spectra or more accurate proper motion measurements. 5. Discussion 5.1. M and L Dwarfs and the Galactic disk scale height 18 objects were identified to be M (or early L) dwarf main-sequence stars. Two objects were found to be best fit by early L dwarf templates (Kirkpatrick et al. 2000). Both of these objects are red enough to be outside of the color range shown in Figures 9 and 10 with (V606 − i775) = 2.21 and (V606 − i775) = 3.47. Deep infrared observations of these two objects will be required to confirm that they are L dwarfs. NICMOS observations of the HUDF did not detect these objects in either the J or H bands. All other very red objects are best fit using M dwarf templates. The broad spectral features of M dwarfs listed in Table 2 were well fitted using M dwarf Pickles (1998) templates, and for objects brighter than i775 = 27.0 mag we believe the identification to be secure. Because these late-type sources can be seen to great distances, they can be used to probe the structure of the Galactic disk and halo as traced by the lowest-mass stellar components -- 10 -- of these populations. This was explored using Monte Carlo mass function (MF) simulations based on those developed by Burgasser et al. (2004). Assuming power-law representations of the MF, dN/dM ∝ M−α, for masses 0.005 to 0.2 M⊙, luminosity (LF) and effective temperature (Tef f ) distributions were created using evolutionary models from Burrows et al. (1997) over the range 100 . Tef f . 4000 K. For all simulations, α was fixed at 1.13 for 0.1 . M . 0.2 M⊙ (Reid et al. 1999) but allowed to vary between 0.5 -- 1.5 for M . 0.1 M⊙; number densities are normalized to the empirical value at 0.1 M⊙ from the 8 pc sample (Reid et al. 1999). Two separate populations were simulated: a disk population with a flat age distribution spanning 10 Myr to 10 Gyr (the majority of sources have age greater than 1 Gyr), and a halo population with uniformly sampled ages between 9-10 Gyr and a relative number density of 0.25% (Digby et al. 2003). The resulting bolometric LFs were converted to I (Cousins) LF's using a polynomial fit to empirical data (spanning 12.4 . MI . 22.2; i.e., M4 to T8) from Dahn et al. (2002) and Golimowski et al. (2004). Note that this fit is based on measurements for Solar metallicity field dwarfs, and may not be appropriate for a subsolar metallicity halo subdwarf population. Apparent I-band distributions were determined by first assuming a constant density population out to a limiting magnitude mI = 27.5 (taking into account the difference between HUDF AB-magnitudes and Vega magnitudes from the empirical data) and then applying a correction for the vertical distribution of sources. For the disk population, we assumed a density distribution n ∝ sech(z/h0)2 (Reid & Hawley 2000), where z = d sin β, d is the source distance, β = 54.5◦ is the Galactic latitude of the HUDF, and h0 is the 1/e disk scale height, assumed to range between 200 and 500 pc. For the halo population, a Galactocentric oblate spheroid distribution as given in Digby et al. (2003) was assumed, using the values derived there and an axial ratio q = c/a = 0.7. Figure 11 presents the results of these simulations in the form of cumulative number distributions as a function of i775 magnitude down to the limiting magnitude of our sample. These distributions show that variations in the disk scale height are far more pronounced than those from the different MF's assumed, and this analysis is limited to the former parameter. The cumulative distribution of the six dwarfs in Table 2 with spectral types M4 and later (consistent with the mass constraints of the simulations) is also shown. The observed distribution matches that of the h0 = 400 pc disk simulation very well, particularly out to i775 . 23.5 mag where the halo population makes negligible contribution. Because the simulated distributions are rather sensitive to the disk scale height, particularly at fainter apparent magnitudes, one can conservatively constrain h0 to ±100 pc assuming Poisson uncertainties. This is in good agreement with the estimate of 340 ± 84pc from Ryan et al. (2004) which was computed using ACS HUDF parallel fields i-drops. For i775 > 25 mag, the observed distribution is slightly greater than the disk population alone but does not increase -- 11 -- as sharply as the combined disk+halo distribution. Indeed, the shape of the observed number distribution implies few if any halo stars in the HUDF down to i775 = 27.0 mag, consistent with the lack of significant proper motion sources in this sample. This suggests that either the number density ratio of halo to disk stars, or the adopted axial ratio for the halo density distribution, or both, may be smaller than assumed here. With no late-type halo subdwarf detections in this sample, we cannot usefully constrain these possibilities. 5.2. White Dwarfs 5.2.1. White Dwarf candidates Objects brighter than i775 = 27.0 were individually examined and distances were esti- mated under various assumptions of what the exact nature of each object might be: (1) a main sequence star; (2) a young white dwarf; (3) an old white dwarf. The reddest objects, which are all well-fitted by M-and-later type templates, as well as the few extra-galactic objects identified in Section 4.3 were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 8 objects were all initially considered to potentially be white dwarfs. Assuming that an object is a white dwarf, one can use the measured V606 − i775 color of that object (Table 1) and the cooling curves of Richer et al. (2000) (after accounting for passbands and zeropoints differences), to derive an absolute V606 band magnitude, an age, and a distance to that object. As shown in figure 2 of Richer et al. (2000), blue white dwarfs can either be young, hot objects (Age 6 5 Gyr, T ≈ 104K, MV606 6 16.0 mag) or older, cooler, intrinsically dimmer ones (Age > 10 Gyr, T ≈ 3 × 103 K, MV606 > 16.0 mag). This results in several white dwarf distance estimates for each object. Proceeding via a process of elimination, the distinction between main sequence stars, young white dwarfs, old white dwarfs, and disk or halo white dwarfs is possible. Assuming that a star is a main sequence star, which is intrinsically much more luminous than a white dwarf, can cause the distance estimate for that object to be unreasonably large. Assuming that a star is a young white dwarf (Age 6 5.0 Gyr) implies that this object is less likely to be part of the Galactic halo since the latter is composed of much older objects. Also, and based on the lack of proper motion detection discussed in Section 4.2, one can define an upper limit to the tangential velocity (VT max) of each object once its distance is determined. The motion of an object moving by more than 0.18 HUDF pixel (0.027 "/ yr) should have been detected at the 3σ significance level as discussed in Section 3.2. As discussed above, objects in the Galactic halo are expected to have velocities around 100-200 km/s. Even if projection effects should result in lower values of VT , one would expect at least some of them to have VT values -- 12 -- larger than 30-60 km/s. A final clue to help narrow down the nature of a particular object is provided by the fact that an object that is nearby would suffer from a significant, easily measurable, parallax during the 73 days interval between Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 observations. Calculating the parallax vector for the HUDF exposures shows that an object 30 pc away would produce a parallax of about 0.060" or 2 HUDF pixel between Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 observations. Objects that are closer than 200 pc are therefore expected to produce a parallax that would be detected at more than 3σ level. Examining Table 3, objects 4322, 4839, 7768, 9020 are unlikely to be main-sequence stars as this would make them very distant objects. The Magellanic Stream (Mathewson & Ford 1984) is too far away from the HUDF to possibly explain the existence of main- sequence stars at such large distances. Objects 1147, 3166, and 5921 which do not (this is true of all objects listed in Table 3) have measurable parallax or proper motion, are not likely to be white dwarfs. Being either young or old white dwarfs would place these two objects less than 200 pc away and would have resulted in measurable parallax in the HUDF image stacks. Another object unlikely to be a white dwarf is object 9230 which was ob- served to have a fainter, unresolved companion 0.5" away. This companion, for which we have no GRAPES spectrum, has a V606 band magnitude of V606 = 23.7 mag and the colors B435 − V606 = 1.6, V606 − i775 = 0.9, i775 − z850 = 0.4 mag. Based on these colors, this object should be an early M dwarf that is (4.9 ± 1.2) × 103 pc away. This places both object 9230 and its companion at the same distance (within error bars). The likelihood of any two stars being within 0.5" in the HUDF, and at nearly the same distance, is very small (6 5 × 10−3) and these two objects are likely to be part of a binary system, with object 9230 being a K type main-sequence star. Independently of this, object 9230 cannot be an old white dwarf since this would place this object at distance of 34 pc where its parallax motion would have been very easily detected. 5.2.2. Disk or halo white dwarfs? Four objects (4322, 4839, 7768, 9020) remain as white dwarf candidates. Using a simple 1/Vmax (Schmidt 1968; Tinney et al. 1993; M´endez 2000) analysis, the white dwarf number density in the direction of the HUDF can be computed. The detection of 4 white dwarfs in the HUDF implies a local density of (3.5 ± 1.5) × 10−5 6 stars/pc3 6 (1.1 ± 0.3) × 10−2. The upper and lower limits on the density are computed using old or young white dwarfs respectively, while the errors reflect the large uncertainties in the intrinsic luminosities of -- 13 -- young and old white dwarfs (∼ 1.0 mag). Note that this estimate is actually not affected by whether or not object 9230 was included as a HUDF white dwarf. The contribution of this object to the 1/Vmax is negligible. For comparison, Liebert, Dahn & Monet (1988) previously determined the local white dwarf density to be 3.0 × 10−3 stars/pc3, while Reid, Sahu & Hawley (2001) found a value of (3.26 ± 1.23) × 10−3 stars/pc3, and M´endez (2000) derived a density of white dwarfs in the thick disk of (2.610 ± 0.59) × 10−2 stars/pc3. The white dwarf density derived here is consistent with most of the previous density estimates. Properly determining the disk and halo membership of the 4 white dwarfs identified in the HUDF will be needed before a stronger conclusion can be made. Re-observing the HUDF field in the i775 band in 1.5 years would allow (assuming that a 0.18 HUDF pixel shift corre- sponds to a 3σ level detection) one to unambiguously detect the proper motion of halo white dwarfs with VT > 100 km/s at distances up to 1000 pc. The above density estimate assumed that all four HUDF white dwarfs were Galactic disk objects. Could some of these objects be in the Galactic halo? At least two of these objects (4839, 7768) have VT max values that are lower than 60 km/s. The probability that this is caused by a projection effect is under 10% (assuming a relatively low velocity of ≈ 100 km/s for halo objects). The last two white dwarfs listed in Table 3 (4322, 9020) are at slightly larger distances which average to 583 pc, and more importantly have larger values of VT max. The average distance of these objects still seems a bit low for objects which would be part of a Galactic halo whose density increases all the way up to 7 kpc (Reid 1993), while white dwarfs with absolute magnitudes of MV606 = 17 mag (Harris et al. 2003) should be detected all the way out to 1000 pc. Unless these objects are intrinsically much dimmer, one would expect the average distance to these two objects to be larger than 583 pc and much closer to our limit of 1000pc. The VT max values inferred for objects 4322 and 9020, while higher than those of objects 4839 and 7768, fall substantially short of expected typical halo velocities. The probability of observing each of the objects with the VT max values listed in Table 3 is between 14 -- 20%. As a group, the probability that objects 4322 and 9020 are halo objects is under 3%. Similarly, the hypothesis that all 4 detected white dwarfs in the HUDF are halo rather than disk objects is excluded at the 99.9986 % level. Overall, the distances to the four white dwarf candidates identified here is more consistent with them being part of a Galactic thick disk. Majewski & Seigel (2002) derived a disk scale height of 400 -- 600 pc using a study of low velocity white dwarfs. This value was somewhat larger than previous estimates of 250 -- 350 pc but it is interesting to note that the M-dwarf disk scale height derived in Section 5.1, as well as the distance estimates of the white dwarfs listed in Table 3 all appear to agree with this value. It would be interesting to attempt to set an upper limit on the halo white dwarf density based on the finding of up to two white dwarfs in the HUDF. Under this assumption, the upper limit to the Galactic halo white dwarf density is computed to be (6.53 ± 3) × 10−3 stars/pc3. -- 14 -- This result is consistent with the previous work of M´endez & Minniti (2000) using the com- bined observations of the Hubble Deep Fields North and South (7.73 × 10−3stars/pc3). A population II halo white dwarf population that is older than 12-13 Gyr would have re- mained undetected here (An intrinsically fainter than MV606 = 17.0 mag white dwarf pop- ulation would also help explaining the low average distances of the white dwarfs listed in Table 3). As discussed above, the white dwarfs identified in this work are more likely to be within the Galactic thick disk. It is to be noted that Kilic et al. (2004) recently observed a disproportionately large fraction of disk to halo white dwarfs in the Hubble Deep Field North (HDF-N). Kilic et al. (2004) found no evidence of any white dwarfs with tangential velocities larger than 30 km/s down to i775 = 27.5 mag and the authors concluded that the blue objects they saw were all part of the Galactic disk. Similarly, the HUDF observations presented here successfully identified 4 white dwarf candidates with i775 ≤ 27.0 mag in the HUDF, none very likely to be in the Galactic halo while 2 -- 3 detection would have been expected to be consistent with previous studies. 5.2.3. Dark halo white dwarfs? While dynamical studies of the Galaxy predict the dark matter white dwarf density as high as 1.26 × 10−2 stars/pc3 (assuming that 100% of the dark matter halo mass is in the form of 0.6M ⊙ white dwarfs), the failure to detect a significant population of high velocity white dwarfs in the HUDF points to a dark matter halo devoid of a significant white dwarf population. Following the methodology of Kawaler (1996), one can estimate the amount of dark matter halo mass that is probed by the HUDF images, and directly compute the fraction of the dark matter halo mass that could be contained in a white dwarf population. Assuming a white dwarf absolute Mi775 magnitude of 17.0 mag(Harris et al. 2003) and a limiting magnitude of i775 = 27.0 mag, the maximum probed distance is 1000 pc. In the corresponding volume, and in the direction of the HUDF, the included dark matter halo mass is 3 M⊙. A population of dark matter halo white dwarfs could possibly have remained undetected in this study for several reasons: (1) The method used in this paper may be inefficient at properly identifying halo white dwarfs in Table 3. In this case, if one assumes that the HUDF contains 4 halo white dwarfs (i775 6 27.0), these would account for 2M⊙, a significant fraction of the expected dark matter halo mass. This would however increase the ratio of halo to disk white dwarfs to unrealistically high levels (i.e. ≫ 2%), and would assume that all the white dwarfs seen in the HUDF are from the dark matter halo and not from the pop II halo, which is highly unrealistic. The lack of proper motion detections also makes this scenario unlikely; (2) White dwarfs do not contribute significantly to the -- 15 -- Galactic dark matter halo mass. From microlensing experiements towards the Magellanic clouds, the contribution of MACHOs to dark matter has been estimated to be anywhere between 20% to less than 2% (Alcock et al. 2000; Afonso et al. 2003; Sahu 2003; Evans & Belokurov 2004, and references therein). Furthermore, Majewski & Seigel (2002) showed how an increased thick disk scale height of 400-600 pc makes it unlikely that white dwarfs could be the MACHO objects; (3) White dwarfs could contribute significantly to the mass of the Galactic dark matter halo but are too faint to be detected in this study. Richer et al. (2000) showed that an increase in the age of the white dwarf halo population from 10 Gyr to 16 Gyr is expected to reduce the number of white dwarf detection (down to V606 = 28.0) by a factor of 7. The lack of high velocity white dwarf detections in the HUDF puts upper limits on the contribution of an hypothetical white dwarf population to the Galactic dark matter halo. Based on the brightest objects in the HUDF for which we have spectra (i.e. i775 6 27.0), if the dark matter halo is as old as about 12 Gyr (Hansen 2002; Charboyer et al. 1998) then dark matter halo white dwarfs with MV = 17.5 (Mi775 = 17.0) contribute less than 20% to the dark matter. If the age of the dark matter halo is 10 Gyr, white dwarfs (Mi775 = 15.9) contribute less than 2% to the dark matter. The possibility that there is a large population of faint white dwarfs that has remained unidentified in this study and which would account for a significant fraction of the dark matter halo can be investigated a little further. Recall that in Section 4.3, 14 sources with (27.0 6 i775 6 29.5) and blue ((B435 − V606) 6 1.8, (V606 − i775) 6 0.8) colors were identified. Not all of these sources were expected to be bona-fide stars and some are likely to be extra- galactic sources, but as discussed in Section 3.1, it is estimated that 95% of the stars in the HUDF were properly identified, so that this number should be considered to be an upper limit on the number of faint starts in the HUDF. Following the same methodology used above, but now using a limiting magnitude of i775 6 29.5, the HUDF images probe through 79 M⊙ of the dark matter halo. Even under the extreme assumption that all 14 unresolved candidates in the UDF are high velocities white dwarfs, this implies that, when reaching down to i775=29.5, faint white dwarfs in the Galactic dark matter halo contributing less than 10% to the total dark matter halo mass for a dark matter halo age of 12 Gyr. Future observations of the HUDF would allow more sensitive measurements of the proper motion of these faint objects (Section 5.2.2). Setting tighter constraints on the maximum tangential velocities of these faint HUDF unresolved objects would allow to exclude some of these objects from high velocity white dwarfs and would allow to further lower the maximum fraction of the dark matter halo mass that could be accounted for by white dwarfs. -- 16 -- 6. Conclusions A systematic search for unresolved objects in the HUDF identified 46 objects with i775 6 29.5 mag. Using the GRAPES spectra of these objects, 28 objects with i775 6 27.0 mag were spectroscopically identified, including 18 M and later dwarfs (including 2 unconfirmed L dwarf candidates), and 2 QSOs. The M dwarf luminosity function of M4 and later-type stars was computed and compared to predictions based on Monte-Carlo simulations. Assuming a simple analytical model of the Galactic disk, the number of detected M dwarfs was shown to be large enough to constraint the scale height of the M and L dwarf Galactic disk to be h0 = 400 ± 100pc. Out of 8 stars that were found to not be M or later-type stars, four stars were determined to be old white dwarf candidates. Not a single object was found to have a proper motion that is larger than 0.027"/year making them likely Galactic thick disk objects. Further imaging of the HUDF, using a time span larger than 1.5 year would provide more sensitive proper motion measurements. More sensitive proper measurements are required to positively place unresolved objects in the Galactic disk or halo. It would also allow to search for high tangential velocity objects amongst the 14 fainter (27.0 6 i775 6 29.5) unresolved sources identified in the HUDF. Excluding halo membership of objects down to i775 = 29.5 based on proper motion measurements would further constraint the maximum white dwarf contribution to the dark matter halo mass. The currently available observations of the HUDF, spanning 73 days, show the absence of a significant population of high velocity white dwarfs down to i775 = 27.0, and a relatively small number of unresolved, faint blue sources in the field down to i775 = 29.5. This is interpreted as a consequence of white dwarfs accounting for less than 10% of the dark matter halo, assuming that the dark matter halo is 12 Gyr old. We would like to thank I. N. Reid for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grant GO -09793.01-A from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA under NASA contract NAS5-26555. REFERENCES Afonso C. et al. 2003, A&A, 404, 145 Alcock, C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 542, 281 Allen, C. W. 2000, Astrophysl Quantities 4th ed. (Athlone Press, London), p388 Beckwith S., et al. 2004, in preparation -- 17 -- Bertin, E. Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393 Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Liebert, J. & Burrows, A. 2003, ApJ, 594, 510 Burgasser, A. J. 2004, ApJS, in press (astro-ph/0407624) Burrows, A. et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856 Chaboyer, B., Demarque, P., Kernan, P.J., Krauss, L.M. 199. Astrophys. J. 494:96-110 Chiba, M. & Beers, T. C., AJ, 199, 2843 Cohen, S. H., Ryan, R. E., Hathi, N., Windhorst, R. A., Koekemoer, A., Xu, C., Pirzkal, N., Malhotra, S. & Strolger, L. 2004, ApJ in preparation Dahn, C. C. et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 1170 Digby, A. P., Hambly, N. C., Cooke, J. A., Reid, I. N., & Cannon, R. D. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 583 Evans, N. W., Belokurov, V. 2004, in press (astroph/0411222) Fruchter, A. S. Hook, R. N. 2002, PASP, 114, 144F Gates, I. E. & Gyuk, G. 2001, ApJ, 547, 786 Gates, I. E. et al. 2004, in press (astroph/0405566) Giavalisco, H. C. et al. 2004, ApJ, L93 Golimowski, D. A. et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 3516 Harris, H. C. et al. 2001, ApJ, 549, L109 Harris, H. C. et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1023 Hansen, B. M. S., et al. 2002, AJ, 574, L155 Ibata, R. A., Richer, H. B., Gilliland, R. L. & Scott, D. 1999, ApJ, 524, L95 Ibata, R. A., Irwin, M., Bienaym´e, O., Scholz, R. & Guibert, J. 2000, ApJ, 532, L41 Kawaler, S., D. 1996, AJ, L61 Kilic, M., von Hippel, T., M`endez, R. A. & Winget, D. E. 2004, ApJ, 609, 766 Kirkpatrick et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 447 -- 18 -- Liebert, J., Dahn, C., C. & Monet, D. G. 1988, ApJ, 332, 891 Majewski, S. R., Siegel, M. H., 2002, ApJ, 569, 432 Mathewson, D., S. & Ford, V., L. 1984, IAUS, 108, 125 M´endez, R. A., Minniti, D., De Marchi, G., Baker, A. & Couch, W. J. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 666 M´endez, R. A. & Minniti, D. 2000, ApJ, 529, 911 M´endez, R. A. 2002, A&A, 395, 779 Oppenheimer, B. R., Hambly, N. C., Digby, A. P., Hodgkin, S. T. & and Saumon, D. 2001, Science, 292, 698 Pirzkal N., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154 Pickles, A. J. 1998, PASP, 110, 863 Reid, I. N. & Majewski, S. R. 1993, ApJ, 409, 635 Reid, I. N. et al. 1999, ApJ, 521, 613 Reid, N. & Hawley, S. L. 2000, New Light on Dark Stars (Chichester: Praxis) Reid, I. N., Sahu, K., C. & Hawley, S. L. 2001, ApJ, 559,942 Reid, I. N., ARA&A, 43, in press Richer, H. B., Hansen, B., Limongi, M., Chieffi, A., Straniero, O. & Fahlman, G. C. 2000, ApJ, 529, 318 Robin, A. C., Reyl´e, C., Derri`ere, S. & Picaud, S. 2003, A&A, 409, 523 Ryan, R. E., Hathi, N. P., Cohen, S. H., & Windhorst, R. A., ApJ in preparation Sahu, K. C. 2003, Space Telescope Science Institute symposium series, Vol. 15, Cambridge University Press, p. 14 - 23 (astro-ph/0302325) Sahu, K. C. 1994, Nature, 370, 275 Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 Schmidt, M. 1968, ApJ, 151, 393 -- 19 -- Tinney, C. G., Reid, I. N. & Mould, J. R. 1993, ApJ, 414, 254 Xu, C. et al. 2004, ApJS, in preparation This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0. -- 20 -- Table 1. Unresolved objects in the HUDF, as selected using the criterion Sz850 60.05 (F850LP ACS band). UID RA (J2000) Dec (J2000) B435 B435-V606 V606-i775 i775-z850 Si775 Sz850 19 366 443 834 911 1147 1343 2150 2368 2457 2977 3166 3561 3794 3940 4120 4322 4643 4839 4945 5317 5441 5921 5992 6334 6442 6461 6620 6732 7113 7194 7357 7525 7768 7894 8081 8157 8186 53.1623248 53.1753062 53.1583988 53.1648156 53.1460739 53.1834639 53.1398080 53.1767483 53.1676057 53.1616105 53.1726388 53.1583425 53.1483050 53.1474097 53.1498728 53.1839107 53.1349058 53.1848922 53.1883621 53.2003709 53.1257144 53.1625253 53.1322881 53.1498432 53.1782000 53.1416300 53.1984259 53.1428439 53.1784892 53.1707114 53.1860335 53.1692789 53.1318579 53.1472186 53.1831085 53.1580838 53.1649526 53.1867094 -27.8269460 -27.8198904 -27.8189953 -27.8143652 -27.8123237 -27.8067589 -27.8100295 -27.7996684 -27.8037923 -27.8027738 -27.8006672 -27.7949215 -27.7977856 -27.7965561 -27.7961691 -27.7954147 -27.7944480 -27.7933971 -27.7923200 -27.7898451 -27.7904647 -27.7896458 -27.7828516 -27.7874448 -27.7861688 -27.7856726 -27.7848674 -27.7849376 -27.7840395 -27.7826303 -27.7822207 -27.7813943 -27.7820076 -27.7714786 -27.7802451 -27.7701503 -27.7736713 -27.7735490 26.58 29.99 31.25 27.67 25.21 19.58 27.36 22.60 29.07 26.98 27.94 20.80 29.24 28.89 27.06 28.04 26.83 31.73 27.22 25.06 29.06 27.81 20.57 27.52 27.71 28.16 26.80 31.27 25.73 30.83 26.91 27.93 28.70 27.12 27.46 27.92 30.85 27.72 1.91 2.20 0.86 2.35 2.09 -0.16 -0.23 1.99 1.18 1.91 -0.18 0.96 1.98 2.14 -0.48 0.03 0.06 1.52 1.20 2.06 0.49 1.75 0.77 1.63 -0.27 -0.19 1.77 3.19 1.13 2.49 -0.12 0.10 2.22 1.66 0.03 -0.32 2.16 -0.13 1.01 3.05 3.47 2.00 1.80 0.52 -0.14 1.43 0.08 0.98 -0.21 0.80 0.91 0.98 -0.21 0.12 -0.06 0.74 0.40 1.74 -0.00 1.27 1.19 0.69 -0.16 0.04 1.00 0.25 -0.04 0.65 -0.13 -0.21 1.08 0.68 -0.15 -0.40 0.40 -0.14 0.30 1.27 1.51 0.76 0.65 0.13 -0.04 0.80 -0.20 0.30 0.18 0.37 0.24 0.29 -0.18 1.31 -0.07 0.25 0.07 0.67 -0.30 0.39 0.51 0.16 -0.18 -0.07 0.30 -0.14 0.01 0.20 -0.06 -0.16 0.30 0.20 -0.12 -0.30 0.07 -0.34 0.015 0.009 0.016 0.013 0.007 0.091 0.045 0.147 0.046 0.004 0.042 0.086 0.018 0.010 0.033 0.023 0.067 0.019 0.018 0.020 0.045 0.016 0.094 0.014 0.049 0.044 0.010 0.041 0.010 0.026 0.048 0.024 0.011 0.014 0.047 0.038 0.042 0.044 0.004 0.030 0.028 0.011 0.002 0.002 0.046 0.003 0.050 0.008 0.049 0.007 0.012 0.007 0.038 0.012 0.043 0.050 0.015 0.013 0.039 0.019 0.070 0.005 0.049 0.030 0.010 0.049 0.022 0.024 0.045 0.031 0.007 0.005 0.039 0.020 0.039 0.029 -- 21 -- Table 1 -- Continued UID RA (J2000) Dec (J2000) B435 B435-V606 V606-i775 i775-z850 Si775 Sz850 9006 9020 9212 9230 9331 9351 9397 9959 53.1853179 53.1685421 53.1485421 53.1580164 53.1638484 53.1781506 53.162852 53.1611698 -27.7799976 -27.7805214 -27.7701387 -27.7691869 -27.767128 -27.7691241 -27.7671662 -27.7555109 27.46 27.00 25.50 21.18 27.95 26.21 21.44 29.12 -0.05 0.28 1.82 0.76 2.20 2.03 0.26 2.42 -0.07 -0.01 0.96 0.38 1.84 1.32 0.11 0.91 0.24 -0.16 0.29 0.10 0.67 0.42 0.02 0.29 0.039 0.025 0.011 0.037 0.025 0.015 0.043 0.022 0.024 0.034 0.003 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.033 0.021 -- 22 -- Table 2. Spectral types of the 46 unresolved objects in the HUDF (28 brighter than i775 = 27.0 mag) and their distance estimates assuming that they are main-sequence objects or white dwarfs with MV = 14 or MV = 17. Two additional, fainter extra-galactic sources are included (UID 4120, 8157) The spectral types were determined by fitting the GRAPES (Pirzkal et al. 2004) spectra of these sources to a set of templates (See Section 4.1). UID Stype i775 > 27.0 MV606 Log(D) MS WD MV = 14 WD MV = 17 19 M1-M2 366 L0-L1 443 L0-M6 834 M4-M5 911 M4-M5 1147 F6-F8 1343 A0-K7 2150 M3-M4 2368 O9-M6 2457 M0-M1 2977 A0-M4 3166 K4-K5 3561 M0-M1 3794 M0-M1 3940 O5-M3 4120 GAL 4322 A7-K5 4643 A0-M6 4839 G5-K2 4945 M4-M5 5317 A0-M6 5441 M2-M3 5921 K4-K5 5992 K7-M0 6334 F8-L0 6442 A0-G5 6461 M0-M1 6620 B8-M4 6732 GAL 7113 G8-K0 7194 O5-K5 7357 O9-M5 7525 M1-M2 7768 K5-K7 7894 B8-K7 8081 O5-A3 8157 GAL no no no no no no yes no yes no yes no no no yes yes no yes no no yes no no no yes yes no yes no yes yes yes no no yes yes yes 9.30 ± 0.25 18.9 ± 0.50 15.6 ± 2.9 11.4 ± 0.39 11.4 ± 0.39 3.82 ± 0.17 4.32 ± 3.58 11.3 ± 0.23 4.19 ± 8.55 8.77 ± 0.28 11.28 ± 0.23 6.96 ± 0.14 8.77 ± 0.28 8.77 ± 0.28 2.37 ± 7.94 4.70 ± 2.4 6.75 ± 5.96 5.65 ± 0.61 11.4 ± 0.38 6.71 ± 6.0 9.93 ± 0.38 6.96 ± 0.14 8.07 ± 0.43 8.34 ± 4.4 2.89 ± 2.2 8.77 ± 0.28 5.45 ± 5.6 5.60 ± 0.19 0.76 ± 6.3 3.73 ± 8.1 9.33 ± 0.23 7.37 ± 0.27 3.73 ± 3.9 −1.98 ± 3.6 4.072 ± 0.050 2.780 ± 0.100 4.261 ± 0.570 3.777 ± 0.077 3.338 ± 0.077 4.180 ± 0.033 6.080 ± 0.716 2.862 ± 0.045 7.145 ± 1.710 4.258 ± 0.056 4.365 ± 0.045 3.573 ± 0.027 4.697 ± 0.056 4.594 ± 0.056 7.315 ± 1.588 5.632 ± 0.479 6.578 ± 1.191 5.087 ± 0.122 3.315 ± 0.077 6.267 ± 1.199 4.228 ± 0.076 3.565 ± 0.027 4.568 ± 0.085 5.505 ± 0.875 6.271 ± 0.429 4.251 ± 0.056 6.345 ± 1.121 5.543 ± 0.038 7.215 ± 1.266 7.131 ± 1.618 4.429 ± 0.045 4.616 ± 0.055 6.223 ± 0.780 7.471 ± 0.716 3.129 3.750 4.274 3.258 2.818 2.142 3.713 2.315 3.774 3.209 3.818 2.164 3.647 3.544 3.702 3.548 4.237 3.400 2.796 3.910 3.407 2.155 3.373 3.791 3.865 3.202 3.812 3.861 3.601 3.760 3.491 3.286 3.680 3.843 2.529 3.150 3.674 2.658 2.218 1.542 3.113 1.715 3.174 2.609 3.218 1.564 3.047 2.944 3.102 2.948 3.637 2.800 2.196 3.310 2.807 1.555 2.773 3.191 3.265 2.602 3.212 3.261 3.001 3.160 2.892 2.686 3.080 3.243 -- 23 -- Table 2 -- Continued UID Stype i775 > 27.0 MV606 Log(D) MS WD MV = 14 WD MV = 17 B0-K7 8186 B9-A3 9006 9020 F0-F2 9212 M0-M1 9230 K2-K3 9331 M5-M6 9351 M1-M2 9397 9959 M0-M1 GAL yes yes no no no no no no no 1.89 ± 5.8 0.94 ± 0.65 3.16 ± 0.44 8.77 ± 0.28 6.40 ± 0.14 12.3 ± 0.45 9.30 ± 0.25 7.038 ± 1.151 6.328 ± 0.131 5.716 ± 0.089 3.979 ± 0.056 3.800 ± 0.028 3.701 ± 0.089 3.974 ± 0.050 3.764 3.697 3.540 2.929 2.279 3.345 3.031 8.77 ± 0.28 4.585 ± 0.056 3.535 3.164 3.097 2.940 2.329 1.679 2.745 2.431 2.935 Table 3. White dwarf candidates in the HUDF (i775 627.0 mag). We list the derived distance to each object under the assumptions that it is a main sequence star or white dwarfs (Richer et al. 2000) with the appropriate V − i colors (See Table 1). VT max is the upper limit of the tangential velocity (VT ) of each object. The seventh column lists the acceptable nature of the object while the last column gives the 1/Vmax density for that particular object/scenario. Section 5.2 explains how these quantities were derived in more detail. UID Type MV606 D (pc) Age (Gyr) VT max (km/s) Possible Type 1/Vmax (star/pc−3) 3.7-4.0 Old WD 1147 MS F6-F8 1147 Young WD 14.0-15.0 1147 17.4-18.3 3166 MS K4-K5 6.8-7.1 3166 Young WD 14.8-15.8 Old WD 3166 17.2-18.2 4322 MS A7-K5 2.3-7.1 4322 Young WD 12.1-13.1 17.5-18.4 4322 Old WD 4839 MS G5-K2 5.0-6.3 4839 Young WD 12.5-13.5 17.4-18.3 4839 5921 MS K4-K5 6.8-7.1 5921 Young WD 14.5-15.5 17.3-18.2 5921 7768 MS K5-K7 7.1-7.6 7768 Young WD 14.5-15.5 7768 17.3-18.2 Old WD 9020 MS F0-F2 2.7-3.6 9020 Young WD 13.3-13.3 17.5-18.4 9020 9230 MS K2-K3 6.3-6.7 9230 Young WD 13.6-14.6 9230 17.5-18.4 Old WD Old WD Old WD Old WD -- 2 4 -- 1.5 ± 1.1 × 104 110 ± 24 24 ± 5 1.4-3.9 10.3-12.1 3.7 ± 0.23 × 103 80± 18 27 ± 6 2.5-5.7 9.9-11.5 14.1 3.0 10.2 3.5 F6-F8 K4-K5 4.29 ± 3.4 × 105 6.9 ± 1.6 × 103 590 ± 126 1.2 ± 0.3 × 105 2.4 ± 0.5 × 103 417 ± 88 3.7 ± 0.2 × 103 93 ± 20 26 ± 5 4.1 ± 0.5 × 104 1.3 ± 0.3 × 103 345 ± 70 5.2 ± 1.0 × 105 6.2 ± 1.4 × 103 576 ± 123 6.3 ± 0.4 × 103 0.4-1.4 10.7-12.9 1545.6 75.5 Disk or Halo 3.37 × 10−3 1.1-3.3 10.4-12.3 1.9-4.7 10.1-11.7 1.9-4.7 10.1-11.7 0.5-1.6 10.7-12.9 885. 53.4 11.9 3.3 160.2 44.1 793.9 73.7 Disk Disk or Halo K4-K5 9.45 × 10−6 1.80 × 10−2 Disk Disk or Halo 2.1 × 10−5 9.9 × 10−4 Disk or Halo 3.16 × 10−3 K2-K3 187 ± 41 32 ± 7 1.1-3.2 10.4-12.3 23.9 4.0 -- 25 -- 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 20 25 30 Fig. 1. -- The distribution of Si775 (green) and Sz850 (red) values for the 10181 HUDF objects. The stellarity index S was defined (see Section 3) so that higher values correspond to objects which are increasingly resolved in the images. We selected unresolved objects fainter than i775 > 20.0 mag to be unresolved if Sz850 60.05, and Sz850 60.15 for brighter objects which are saturated. -- 26 -- Fig. 2. -- The distribution of Sz850 values for the brightest 369 objects in the field. Each object appears 10 times in this figure, with increasingly lower signal to noise (increasingly darker dots). The observed increase in S values as a function of magnitude at i775 > 29.0 mag is similar to the one observed in Figure 1 where the real distribution of the S values from the 10181 HUDF objects is shown. This demonstrates the robustness of S to distinguish between point sources and extended objects down to faint magnitudes. At fainter magnitudes, images of stars become increasingly dominated by noise which tends to increases the measured values of S . The same test was performed in the i775 band and yielded an identical behavior. -- 27 -- 4 4 2 2 0 0 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 600 600 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 3 3 2.5 2.5 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 5 5 4.5 4.5 4 4 3.5 3.5 3 3 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 550 550 500 500 450 450 400 400 350 350 6000 6000 7000 7000 8000 8000 9000 9000 6000 6000 7000 7000 8000 8000 9000 9000 Fig. 3. -- GRAPES spectra of unresolved objects in the HUDF and the two best matching templates (solid lines) listed in Table 2 -- 28 -- 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 600 600 500 500 3.5 3.5 3 3 2.5 2.5 2 2 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.5 1.5 1 1 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1 1 0.8 0.8 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 6000 6000 7000 7000 8000 8000 9000 9000 6000 6000 7000 7000 8000 8000 9000 9000 Fig. 4. -- GRAPES spectra of unresolved objects in the HUDF and the two best matching templates (solid lines) listed in Table 2 -- 29 -- 12 12 11 11 10 10 9 9 6 6 4 4 2 2 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 100 100 50 50 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 200 200 180 180 160 160 140 140 120 120 10 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 6000 6000 7000 7000 8000 8000 9000 9000 6000 6000 7000 7000 8000 8000 9000 9000 Fig. 5. -- GRAPES spectra of unresolved objects in the HUDF and the two best matching templates (solid lines) listed in Table 2. The bottom 4 objects are the extra-galactic sources 4120, 6732, 8157, 9397 estimated to be at redshifts of z = 2.1, z = 3.2, z > 3.0, z = 3.0, respectively (Xu 2004). -- 30 -- 20 25 30 0 1 2 Fig. 6. -- The location of the 28 spectroscopically identified sources in a magnitude color plot. The small, dark points are the entire set of objects in the HUDF catalog with i775 6 29.0 mag and z850 6 28.2 mag. Solid red squares are M dwarfs. Empty red squares are the two L dwarf candidates. Solid green triangles represent the non M or L dwarfs stars which could be main-sequence stars. The empty blue circles are white dwarf candidates (Table 3). The solid yellow circles represent the QSOs. -- 31 -- 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 1 2 3 4 Fig. 7. -- The location of the 28 spectroscopically identified sources in a magnitude color plot. The symbols are the same as in Figure 6. -- 32 -- Fig. 8. -- Left panel: observed shifts (scaled by a factor of 500) of the 360 most compact sources in the HUDF between Epoch 1 to Epoch 2, i775 band, images; Right panel: cor- rected shifts, obtained after applying a correction based on a fit of the raw measurements (right panel, see Section 3.2). North is up on these panels. The axes units are UDF pixels (0.030"/pixel). -- 33 -- O5V A0V F0V G0V K0V M0V 4.9 T4000K T5000K 4.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 T3000K 0.1 0 1 2 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 Fig. 9. -- (V606-i775) vs. (B435-V606) color-color plot of i775 6 27.0, unresolved, spectroscop- ically identified objects in the HUDF. M and L dwarfs are shown using red squares with photometric error bars. Main-sequence stars are shown in green thick circles. Extra-galactic objects, including those dimmer than i775 = 27.0 mag, are shown using large blue stars. The 5 white dwarf candidates are shown using large blue crosses. Pickles main-sequence objects are also shown using small black circles. The (B435-V606) locations of the O, A , F, G, K, and M stellar type are shown for reference. Hot white dwarfs are shown in large blue squares. Cool white dwarfs ((3000◦K, 4000◦K, 5000◦K), Harris et al. 2001) are shown using labeled, empty circles. Finally, the solid black line shows the QSO track, from redshift of z=4.0 (top right) to z=0.1 (bottom left) -- 34 -- O5V A0V F0V K0V M0V 0.5 0 -0.5 T3000K T5000K T4000K 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.9 0.1 0 1 2 Fig. 10. -- (i775-z850) vs. (V606-i775) color-color plot of i775 6 27.0 mag, unresolved, spectro- scopically identified objects in the HUDF. The labels and symbols used are the same as in Figure 9. -- 35 -- Fig. 11. -- Predicted and observed cumulative luminosity functions of stars with spectral types M4 and later. This plot shows the expected distribution from the Galactic disk and halo. Four different disk scale heights are plotted with h0 values of 200, 300, 400 and 500 pc (bottom curves to top curves respectively). For each value of h0, Mass Functions corresponding to α = 0.5 and 1.5 are shown (solid and dashed lines respectively). The observed HUDF distribution is shown using a solid black line which is best fit by a disk with a scale height of h0 = 400pc while reasonably excluding values of h0 = 200,300, and 500.
astro-ph/0511574	1	0511	2005-11-18T18:20:17	Metallicity and colours in galaxy pairs in chemical hydrodynamical simulations	[ "astro-ph" ]	Using chemical hydrodynamical simulations consistent with a Lambda-CDM model, we study the role played by mergers and interactions in the regulation of the star formation activity, colours and the chemical properties of galaxies in pairs. A statistical analysis of the orbital parameters in galaxy pairs (r <100 kpc/h) shows that the star formation (SF) activity correlates strongly with the relative separation and weakly with the relative velocity, indicating that close encounters (r <30 kpc/h) can increase the SF activity to levels higher than that exhibit in galaxies without a close companion. Analysing the internal properties of interacting systems, we find that their stability properties also play a role in the regulation the SF activity (Perez et al 2005a). Particularly, we find that the passive star forming galaxies in pairs are statistically more stable with deeper potential wells and less leftover gas than active star forming pairs. In order to compare our results with observations, we also build a projected catalog of galaxy pairs (2D-GP: rp <100 kpc/h and Vr <350 km/s), constructed by projecting the 3D sample in different random directions. In good agreement with observations (Lambas et al 2003), our results indicate that galaxies with rp < 25 kpc/h (close pairs) show an enhancement of the SF activity with respect to galaxies without a close companion. (Abridged.)	astro-ph	astro-ph	Asociaci´on Argentina de Astronom´ıa BAAA, Vol. 48, 2005 E.M. Arnal, A. Brunini, J.J. Clari´a, J.C. Forte, D.A. G´omez, D. Garc´ıa Lambas, Z. L´opez Garc´ıa, Stella M. Malaroda, & G.E. Romero, eds. COMUNICACI ´ON DE TRABAJO -- CONTRIBUTED PAPER Metallicity and colours in galaxy pairs in chemical hydrodynamical simulations. Josefa P´erez Facultad de Ciencias Astron´omicas y Geof´ısicas, UNLP, Argentina, [email protected] Patricia Tissera Instituto de Astronom´ıa y F´ısica del Espacio, Buenos Aires, Argentina, [email protected] Diego Garcia Lambas Observatorio Astron´omico de la Universidad Nacional de C´ordoba, Argentina, [email protected] Cecilia Scannapieco Instituto de Astronom´ıa y F´ısica del Espacio, Buenos Aires, Argentina, [email protected] Abstract. Using chemical hydrodynamical simulations consistent with a Λ-CDM model, we study the role played by mergers and interactions in the regulation of the star formation activity, colours and the chemical properties of galaxies in pairs. A statistical analysis of the orbital param- eters in galaxy pairs (r < 100 kpc h−1) shows that the star formation (SF) activity correlates strongly with the relative separation and weakly with the relative velocity, indicating that close encounters (r < 30 kpc h−1) can increase the SF activity to levels higher than that exhibit in galaxies without a close companion. Analysing the internal properties of interacting systems, we find that their stability properties also play a role in the regulation the SF activity (P´erez et al 2005a). Particularly, we find that the passive star forming galaxies in pairs are statistically more stable with deeper potential wells and less leftover gas than active star forming pairs. In order to compare our results with observations, we also build a projected catalog of galaxy pairs (2D-GP: rp < 100 kpc h−1 and ∆V < 350 km s−1), constructed by projecting the 3D sam- ple in different random directions. In good agreement with observations (Lambas et al 2003), our results indicate that galaxies with rp < 25 kpc h−1 (close pairs) show an enhancement of the SF activity with respect to galaxies without a close companion. All the properties studied for galaxy pairs are analysed in the 2D and 3D simulated catalogs, allowing us to assess the contamination level introduced by spurious pairs. Con- sistently with observational estimations (Nikolic et al 2004), we find that 1 2 J. P´erez, P. Tissera, D.G. Lambas & C. Scannapieco the percentage of spurious pairs decreases with the relative separation, representing almost a 30% for the 2D-GP and a 19% for close pairs. We also analyse the environmental effect on the star formation (SF) activity for both, pairs and isolated galaxy samples, finding the expected SFR- local density relation (Gomez et al 2003), with a significantly stronger dependence for close pairs. Finally, we analyse the colour and chemical properties of galaxies in pairs in order to investigate the effect of inter- actions on the bimodal colour distribution observed in galaxies (Balogh et al. 2004; Tissera et al. 2005) and the mass-metallicity relation for the stellar population (Tremonti et al. 2004). Resumen. Usando simulaciones qu´ımicas hidrodin´amicas consistentes con un modelo Λ-CDM, estudiamos el rol de las interacciones y colisiones de galaxias sobre la actividad de formaci´on estelar (SF), los colores y las propiedades qu´ımicas de las mismas. El an´alisis estad´ıstico de los efectos de las interacciones entre galaxias sobre la actividad de formaci´on este- lar como funci´on de los par´ametros orbitales, muestra que los encuentros cercanos (r < 30 kpc h−1) pueden inducir una actividad de formaci´on estelar superior a la encontrada en sistemas aislados. Sin embargo, en- contramos que la estabilidad de los sistemas gal´acticos tambi´en juega un rol fundamental en la regulaci´on de este proceso (P´erez et al 2005). As´ı, las galaxias en pares con baja actividad de SF tienden a ser m´as estables (con pozos de potencial m´as profundos) que las galaxias en pares con alta taza de formaci´on estelar. A fin de comparar nuestros resultados con los observacionales, construimos un cat´alogo proyectado de pares de galaxias (2D-GP), siguiendo los criterios de selecci´on utilizados por Lambas et al (2003): rp < 100 kpc h−1 and ∆V < 350 km s−1. Consistentemente con las observaciones, encontramos que los pares cercanos (rp < 25 kpc h−1) muestran niveles de SF superiores a aquellos correspondientes a galaxias aisladas. Comparando los cat´alogos 2D-GP y 3D-GP, estimamos los posi- bles efectos de proyecci´on sobre los resultados observacionales, analizando la contribuci´on de los pares espurios en las simulaciones. De acuerdo con estimaciones observacionales (Nikolic et al 2004), nuestros resultados muestran que el porcentaje de pares espurios disminuye con la distan- cia relativa, encontrando un 30% para 2D-GP y un 19% para los pares cercanos. Por otro lado, analizamos los efectos ambientales sobre la ac- tividad de formaci´on estelar, tanto para las galaxias en pares como para aquellas sin un vecino cercano. Encotramos, en buen acuerdo con las observaciones (Gomez et al 2003), que existe una relaci´on entre la SF y la densidad local para ambas muestras con una mayor dependencia para los pares cercanos. Finalmente, investigamos los efectos que producen las interacciones de galaxias sobre el color y las propiedades qu´ımicas de las mismas, con el fin de evaluar su rol en la determinaci´on de la distribuci´on bimodal de colores observada (Balogh et al. 2004; Tissera et al. 2005) y la relaci´on masa-metalicidad de la poblaci´on estelar (Tremonti et al. 2004). Metallicity and colours in galaxy pairs. 3 1. Introduction Observations show that mergers and interactions can induce star formation (SF) activity in galaxies (e.g. Larson and Tinsley 1978). Barton et al. (2000) and Lambas et al. (2003, LTAC03) analysed a sample of pair galaxies in the field finding a clear correlation between the proximity in projected distance and ra- dial velocity of two galaxies and their SF activity. On the other hand, numerical simulations of pre-prepared mergers showed that interactions between axisym- metrical systems without bulges might induce gas inflows to the central region of the systems, triggering starburst episodes (Mihos and Hernquist 1996). Results from the study of the effects of mergers in the SF history of galactic objects in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations (Tissera et al. 2002), indicate that, during some mergers events, gaseous disks could experience two starbursts de- pending on the characteristic of the potential well. Recently, observational results obtained by Balogh et al (2004) confirm a bi- modal colour distribution, which segregates galaxies into blue and red popula- tions. They find that this bimodality is well fitted using two Gaussian distribu- tions. Analysing this colour distributions for an important range of magnitudes and densities, they find that while the characteristics of the Gaussians depends strongly with luminosity, seems not to change with the local density. According to Balogh et al (2004) this invariability with the environment suggest that the process of transforming blue into red galaxies has to be very efficient and to overcome the effects of environment. In this work, we will investigate how effective interactions and mergers of galaxies are in the regulation of SF activity and if they are responsible in determining the other internal properties of galaxies like colours and chemical abundances. If the Universe is consistent with a hierarchical scenario, then, interactions and mergers are of utmost importance to understand the effects and efficiency that these physical processes have on the life of galaxies. Thus, we will focus on a statistical analysis of galaxy pairs in a hierarchical scenario with the aim at confronting this scenario with recent observational results of galaxy pairs. Details can be found in P´erez et al. (2005a, 2005b). 2. Results We have analysed a Λ-CDM simulation (Λ = 0.7, Ω = 0.3, H = 100h kms−1Mpc−1 with h = 0.7) run with the chemical cosmological GADGET-2 (Scannapieco et al. 2005). From this simulation we constructed the 2D-GP and 3D-GP cata- logs. In order to unveil the effects of interactions, we also build the respective galaxy control samples defined by galaxies without a close companion within the corresponding thresholds in relative separation and velocity used to define each GP catalogs (P´erez et al 2005a). For each simulated galaxy, we estimated the stellar birthrate parameter b, defined as the present level of SF activity of a galaxy normalized to its mean past SF rate and the absolute magnitudes in different wavelenghts (De Rossi et al 2005). The analysis of the SF activity for galaxies in the 3D-GP catalog as a function of their orbital parameters shows that close encounters (pairs with a relative separation less 30 ± 10 kpc h−1) can enhance the SF activity at higher levels 4 J. P´erez, P. Tissera, D.G. Lambas & C. Scannapieco than those measured for galactic systems without a close companion. On the other hand, the SF activity seems to correlate more weakly with the relative velocities. However, we also find almost a 50% of passive star forming galaxies in close pairs, suggesting that the internal properties of these systems are also present in the SF process. Effectively, we find that the triggering of SF by tidal interactions is also regulated by the stability of the systems and the gas reservoir. The analysis of the passive SF close pairs show that part of these systems have experienced recent star formation activity and the rest shows deeper potential well and are less leftover gas than galaxies in pairs with strong SF activity. When the projected catalog of pair is analysed, the same global trends detected in the 3D-GP sample are found, although a shrinking in the enhancement thresh- old in projected distance is observed. It value drops with respect to that found in 3D to ∼ 25 ± 5 kpc h−1 in good agreement with observational results (LTAG03). This shrinking in the threshold is produced by both geometrical projection ef- fects and spurious pairs. In order to separate these both effects, we have removed spurious pairs from the 2D-GP sample by checking their 3D relative separations. Consistently with previous works (Alonso et al. 2004), we found that 30% of the pairs in 2D-GP sample are spurious. This percentage reduces to 19% for 2D close pairs (rp < 25 kpc h−1 and ∆cz < 100 km s−1). Analysing the dependence of the SF on environment with the projected local density parameter (defined like in the observational analysis as Σ = 6/(πd2 6), with d6 the projected distance to the 6th neighbor brighter than Mr = −20.5), we detect the expected SFR-local density relation (Gomez et al 2003) for both galaxies in pairs and without a near companion, with a stronger dependence for close pairs. The important decrease in the SF activity and the significant increase of the fraction of passive SF members from low to high density regions for galaxies in close pairs suggest that interactions might a relevant role in the origin of the SF-density relation. In order to infer the effect of interactions on the colour distribution of galaxies, we also evaluate the u−r colour for the simulated galaxies in pairs compared with that found for galaxies without a near companion. According results obtained by Balogh et al (2004), we adopt the value u − r = 1.8 to segregate red and blue galaxies. We found that the mean colours of the blue and red peaks for pairs are at < u − r >≈ 1.60 and < u − r >≈ 2.06, with similar values for the control sample. However, while pairs exhibit a clear bimodal colour distribution with a 58 per cent of galaxies in the blue peak, the control sample is more consistent with an unimodal distribution with an excess of red systems (26 per cent of galaxies in the blue peak). Comparing the simulated control sample with observations (Balogh et al 2004), we also find an excess of the fraction of red galaxies. Part of this red excess might be produced by the high efficiency in the transformation of gas into stars of our simulations which is not regulated by supernova energy feedback. However, tidal torques generated by interactions can compress the leftover gas in a short-time producing strarbursts which might be the responsible of producing the bimodal distribution found for galaxies in pairs. To gain insight in this analysis, we divide the galaxy pair catalog into merging (r < 30 kpc h−1) and interacting (30 kpc h−1 < r < 25 kpc h−1) pairs. Although the bimodal distribution is present in both subsamples, the fraction of blue galaxies is higher than the red one for the merging systems, Metallicity and colours in galaxy pairs. 5 with the opposite result for the interacting pairs. This results is consistent with the present level of SF activity found for merging and interacting systems. The former has a 36% of active SF galaxies (SF activity higher than for the control sample), while the latter has only a 10% of active SF galaxies. The SF activity in the recent past for the currently passive SF systems is also responsible for the colour distribution of galaxies. As shown in P´erez et al (2005b), we find that the fraction of currently passive SF systems which have experienced strong activity in the recent 0.5 Gyr (F∗) anticorrelates with the u − r colour. The contribution to the blue colours comes from galaxies that independently of their current SF activity, have experienced an strong SF activity in the recent last 0.5 Gyr. Finally, we analyse the chemical properties of the interstellar medium (ISM) and the stellar population (SP) of galaxies in pairs. While for SP exhibits a clear excess of their chemical abundance respect to that found for galaxies without a near companion, the ISM enriched by the new stars, has different levels of chemical contamination depending on the SF activity of the galaxy. Particularly, if we segregate galaxies into active and passive according their current SF level, we find that SP of passive SF galaxies are more enriched than the active ones. On the contrary, ISM of passive galaxies are less enriched than the ISM of the active ones. Interesting, we also find that the distribution of the chemical abundance of the ISM of these systems has a similar behaviour with the relative separation between the members of the pair than that found for the SF activity. In other words that the ISM of currently passive SF pairs shows an enhancement of their chemical enrichment respect to that measured in the control sample for very close systems (rp < 25 kpc h−1). The analysis of the recently past SF activity of these galaxy pairs shows that, although these systems are currently passive SF ones, they have experienced strong SF activity in the recent past which has contributed to enhance the chemical abundance in their ISM. 3. Conclusions From the analysis of the 3D-simulated galaxy pair catalog, we conclude that close galaxy interactions (r < 30 kpc h−1) can be correlated with an enhancement of SF activity at higher levels than those measured for galactic systems without a close companion. We also found that the internal dynamical stability of galactic systems plays an important role as it can be deduced from the presence of an anticorrelation signal between the deepness of the potential well and the star formation activity. The construction of a projected galaxy pair catalog allowed us, firstly, to make a suitable comparison with observations and then, to analyse the contamination effects introduced by spurious pairs. In a good agreement with observational results, we find that all trends observed for the 3D-GP catalog are reproduced in a similar way for the 2D-GP one. On the other hand, the analysis of the spurious pairs shows that the contamination level increases with the relative separation. Consistently with previous works (Alonso et al. 2004), we find that almost a 30% of the pairs in 2D-GP sample are spurious. The environmental effects on the interacting pairs were analysed, defining the local density using the projected distance to the 6th. We find a dependence of the SF on local density which is consistent with the observed SF-density 6 J. P´erez, P. Tissera, D.G. Lambas & C. Scannapieco relation (Gomez et al 2003). It yields a decrease in the level of SF activity and an increase in the fraction of passive SF systems with increasing local density. Although, this relation is found for both pairs and control samples, we find that it is significantly stronger for close pairs suggesting the fundamental role of interaction in driving the SF-density relation. The analysis of the colours and chemical properties of galaxies also seem to be regulated by the interactions. We find a clear bimodal colour distribution for galaxies in pairs with a blue peak populated basically by galaxies with an strong, currently or recently past SF activity. Finally, analysing the chemical properties of galaxy pairs, we find that while SP seems to store information about the history of mergers and interactions, the chemical abundance of the ISM seems to be contaminated by the new stars, reflecting in this way the effects of the present interactions. Our results are in very good agreement with recent observational works. Regarding the bimodal colour distribution, we found that although interactions and merger are able to explain the bimodal colour distri- bution, supernova energy feedback seems to be required to prevent an excessive transformation of gas into stars and to obtain the detail characteristics of this distribution. Acknowledgments. This work was partially supported by the Consejo Na- cional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas and Fundaci´on Antorchas. Sim- ulations were run on Ingeld PC Cluster funded by Fundaci´on Antorchas. We thank the LOC of this meeting for their help made our participation possible. Patricia B. Tissera thanks the Aspen Center for Astrophysics for the hospitality during the Summer Workshop 2004. References Alonso, M. S., Tissera, P. B., Coldwell, G., Lambas D. G. 2004,MNRAS, 352,1081. Balogh M. L., Eke V., Miller C., et al., 2004, MNRAS, 348, 1355. Barton E. J., Geller M. J., Kenyon S. J., 2000, ApJ, 530, 660. Lambas, D. G., Tissera, P. B., Alonso, M. S. Coldwell, G. 2003, MNRAS, 346,1189 (LTAG03). Larson, R. B., Tinsley, B. M., 1978, ApJ, 219, 46. Mihos, J. C., Hernquist, L., 1996,ApJ, 464, 641. Navarro J.F. & White S.D.M., 1994, MNRAS 267, 401. Nikolic B., Cullen H., Alexander P., 2004, MNRAS 355, 874. P´erez, M.J., Tissera P.B., Lambas, D. G., Scannapieco, C. 2005, A&A accepted (astro-ph/0510327) P´erez, M.J., Tissera P.B., Lambas, D. G., Scannapieco, C. 2005, Scannapieco C., Tissera P.B., White S.D.M. & Springel V., 2005, MNRAS ac- cepted (astro-ph/0505440) Tissera P.B, Dom´inguez-Teneiro R., Scannapieco C. & S´aiz A., 2002, MNRAS, 333, 327.
0804.0589	1	0804	2008-04-03T16:38:46	Comment on 'Discreteness Effects in Lambda Cold Dark Matter Simulations: A Wavelet-Statistical View' by Romeo et al	[ "astro-ph" ]	Essential equivalence of the conclusions of Romeo et al. (arXiv:0804.0294v1) with earlier work is pointed out. A possible general explanation for these conclusions is suggested.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Comment on “Discreteness Effects in Lambda Cold Dark Matter Simulations: A Wavelet-Statistical View” by Romeo et al. Adrian L. Melott Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Kansas [email protected] Abstract: Essential equivalence of the conclusions of Romeo et al. with earlier work is pointed out. A possible general explanation for these conclusions is suggested. Introduction and Conclusions Romeo et al. (2008) performed simulations with truncated power spectra in order to investigate the effect of small—scale power in initial conditions in numerical simulations. This approach was introduced in Melott & Shandarin (1989); see also Melott & Shandarin (1990), Beacom et al. (1991), Melott & Shandarin (1993). They conclude that discreteness effects are visible in the simulations on all scales ε < 2d where ε is the force resolution (sometimes called “softening”), and d is the mean interparticle separation. Although there is no sharp and sudden disappearance of discreteness effects, this conclusion is in disagreement with the usual claims of viability down to the scale ε. Furthermore, although not noted by Romeo et al., this is essentially the same as conclusions previously discussed by Peebles et al. (1989), Melott & Shandarin (1989), Melott (1990), Melott & Shandarin (1990), Beacom et al. (1991), Melott & Shandarin (1991), Kuhlman et al. (1996), Melott et al. (1997), and Splinter et al. (1998). Specific numerical tests of discreteness are described in the first of these, and are the primary topic of the last three; the others present visual comparisons and use truncated power spectra for comparison purposes. The suppression of discreteness is the basis for the choice of PM codes over direct N-body and P3M methods, since it maximizes reliable resolution for given computer capacity compared with those approaches. Such suppression is particularly important where discreteness can easily spoil results (e.g. Melott 1982). This, for example, made it possible to discern for the first time filamentary superclusters in CDM (Melott et al. 1983). As noted by Romeo et al., adaptive mesh refinement may make it possible to improve upon this, but AMR needs careful, critical tests, and will still exclude initial fluctuations below the comoving initial particle Nyquist scale. Discussion A possible explanation for this limitation based on the idea of chaotic trajectories was proposed by Melott et al. (1997). Chaotic trajectories were analyzed by Suto (1991) as a function of time and the ratio ε/d. He found that the Lyapunov exponent ~ε-1.2. The criterion that uncertainties in trajectory on scale ε not grow larger than scale d in a Hubble Time leads to the condition ε ≥ d; for more details see these two papers. References Beacom, J.F., K.G. Dominik, A.L. Melott, S.P. Perkins, and S.F. Shandarin, “Gravitational Clustering in the Expanding Universe: Controlled High-Resolution Studies in Two Dimensions”, Astrophysical Journal 372, 351 (1991) Kuhlman, B., A.L. Melott, and S.F. Shandarin, ”A Test of the Particle Paradigm in N-Body Simulations”, Astrophysical Journal Letters 470, L41 (1996) Melott, A.L. “The Formation of Galactic Halos in the Neutrino-adiabatic Theory” Nature 296, 721 (1982) Melott, A.L., J. Einasto, E. Saar, I. Suisalu, A. Klypin and S. Shandarin “Cluster Analysis of the Nonlinear Evolution of Large Scale Structure in an Axion/Gravitino/Photino Dominated Universe” Physical Review Letters 51, 935 (1983) Melott, A.L, and S.F. Shandarin, “Gravitational Instability with High Resolution” Astrophysical Journal 343, 26 (1989) Melott, A.L. “More Resolution Isn't Always Better Resolution”, Comments on Astrophysics 15, 1 (1990) Melott, A.L,, and S.F. Shandarin, “Generation of Large-Scale Cosmological Structures by Gravitational Clustering” Nature 346, 633 (1990) Melott, A.L. and S.F. Shandarin, “Controlled Experiments in Cosmological Gravitational Clustering”, Astrophysical Journal 410, 469 (1993) Melott, A.L., S.F. Shandarin, R.J. Splinter, and Y. Suto, “Demonstrating Discreteness and Collision Error in Cosmological N-body Simulations of Dark Matter Gravitational Clustering”, Astrophysical Journal Letters 479, L79 (1997) Peebles, P.J.E., A.L. Melott, M.R. Holmes, and L.R. Jiang, “A Model for the Formation of the Local Group”, Astrophysical Journal 345, 108 (1989) Romeo, A.B., O. Agertz, B. Moore, and J. Steidel, “Discreteness Effects in Lambda Cold Dark Matter Simulations: A Wavelet-Statistical View”, preprint (2008) arXiv:0804.0294v1 Splinter, R.J., A.L. Melott, S.F. Shandarin, and Y. Suto, “Fundamental Discreteness Limitations of Cosmological N-Body Clustering Simulations”, Astrophysical Journal 497, 38 (1998) Suto, Y. “On the stochasticity of gravitational many-body systems in cosmology”, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan. 43, L9 (1991)
astro-ph/0207434	1	0207	2002-07-19T21:04:29	Carbon Isotopic Abundances in the Red Giants of Omega Centauri (NGC5139)	[ "astro-ph" ]	Carbon-12 and carbon-13 abundances are measured in eleven red-giant members of the globular cluster Omega Centauri via observations of first-overtone CO bands near 2.3 microns. The mean value for the entire sample is <12C/13C>= 4.3 +/-0.4, with nine giants equal, within the errors, to the equilibrium ration of 12C/13C= 3.5. No correlation is found within Omega Cen between 12C/13C and the abundance of iron. The relation between 12C/13C and other abundance ratios, such as [O/Fe], {Na/Fe], or [Al/Fe] are also discussed.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Carbon Isotopic Abundances in the Red Giants of ω Centauri (NGC 5139) Department of Physics, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968 Verne V. Smith Donald M. Terndrup1 Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 and Nicholas B. Suntzeff Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile ABSTRACT Carbon-12 and carbon-13 abundances have been measured in eleven bright giant members of the globular cluster ω Centauri via observations of the first-overtone CO bands near 2.3 µm. The stars in this sample were selected to span a substantial fraction of the range of iron abundances found in this cluster. In addition, the sample covers a range of [O/Fe], [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] abundance ratios derived in previous studies. In all ω Cen giants the 12C/13C abundance ratio is found to be quite low, indicating deep mixing in these red giants. The mean value for the entire sample is h12C/13Ci = 4.3 ± 0.4 (σ = 1.3), with nine stars equal, within the errors, to the equilibrium ratio 12C/13C = 3.5 and two stars having slightly higher values. There is no correlation between the 12C/13C and the abundance of iron. In addition, no correlation of 12C/13C with [12C/Fe] is found (all giants are deeply mixed), although the derived abundances of [12C/Fe] show a positive correlation with [O/Fe], and an anticorrelation with [Na/Fe] (with the oxygen and sodium abundances taken from previous studies in the literature). A comparison of the isotopic carbon ratios in ω Cen with those from other globular clusters (M4, M71, NGC6752, and 47 Tuc), and with literature oxygen abundances, may reveal a slight trend of decreasing 12C/13C ratios with decreasing [O/Fe] in the entire globular cluster sample of red giants. A comparison between 12C/13C and both [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe], however, reveals no trend. Subject headings: globular clusters: osynthesis, abundances -- stars; abundances -- stars: late-type -- stars: Population II individual (ω Centauri) -- nuclear reactions, nucle- 1Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agree- ment with the National Science Foundation. -- 2 -- 1. Introduction In the last two decades, it has become clear that evolved giants in metal-poor globular clusters often exhibit a wide range in the abundances of light elements (Paltoglou & Norris 1995; Norris & Da Costa 1995b; Pilachowski, Sneden, & Kraft 1996; Shetrone 1996a, b; Kraft et al. 1997; Sneden et al. 1997; Gonzalez & Wallerstein 1998; Ivans et al. 1999; Smith et al. 2000). These variations are generally agreed to arise from proton capture chains that convert C and O into N, Ne into Na, and Mg to Al in the hydrogen-burning layers of red giants. There has been considerable discussion, however, as to the origin of these abundance patterns (e.g., Cottrell & Da Costa 1981; Kraft 1994; Norris & Da Costa 1995a; Sneden et al. 1997). In the "primordial" scenario, the abundance patterns reflect nucleosynthesis in a prior generation of massive stars; support for this comes from variations in the C, N, O, Na, Mg, and Al abundances among both main-sequence and turn-off stars in various globular clusters, as found by Bell, Hesser, & Cannon (1983), Briley, Hesser, & Bell (1991), Suntzeff & Smith (1991), Briley et al. (1996), Cannon et al. (1998) or Gratton et al. (2001). In contrast, the "evolutionary" scenario envisions that the products of internal proton capture are brought to the stellar surface through mixing in the giants now observed in the clusters. Evidence in favor of this comes from abundance patterns that depend on the evolutionary state of the stars in a cluster. For example, several systems show a decline in the overall carbon abundance with increasing stellar luminosity and a corresponding rise in the abundance of nitrogen, a sharp decline in the ratio of 12C/13C from the presumed primordial value near 90 (i.e., the solar value) to values as low as the nuclear equilibrium value of 3.5. This equilibrium ratio of 12C/13C= 3.5, which is set largely by the ratio of reaction rates 12C(p,γ)13N(β+,ν)13C and 13C(p,γ)14N, is insensitive to temperature and is a well-determined astrophysical limit (see the review by Wallerstein et al. 1997). So-called "standard" stellar models evolving up the first ascent of the red giant branch, e.g., Iben (1964) or Charbonnel (1994), predict values to go only as low as 12C/13C∼ 20: the differences between the observed (low) isotopic carbon ratios and the higher values predicted by the standard models of stellar evolution has been a longstanding piece of evidence used to invoke extra mixing (or deeper mixing) in red giants. Quite possibly, in the globular cluster stars, both primordial and evolutionary chemical evolution occurs, whereby deep mixing in the current giants is superimposed on preexisting abundance patterns (Briley et al. 1994; Ivans et al. 1999). Mixing signatures are seen also in metal-poor field giants (Gratton et al. 2000, and references therein), with some interesting differences found between the field stars and globular cluster giants of the same overall metallicity. The O -- Na and Mg -- Al anticorrelations found in some of the globular clusters are not observed in any of the field red giants. One effect noted in the field giants by Gratton et al. (2000), and also predicted by current non-standard stellar models (Charbonnel 1994; Wasserburg, Boothroyd, & Sackmann 1995; Charbonnel, Brown, & Wallerstein 1998), is that the efficacy of first giant branch mixing will increase as the metallicity decreases. The globular cluster ω Centauri is a site where the various mixing trends (as a function of [Fe/H] and as a function of Na and Al variations) can be studied in one object. -- 3 -- The most massive globular in the Milky Way, ω Cen has a wide spread of [Fe/H]2 (Suntzeff & Kraft 1996; Norris, Freeman, & Mighell 1996, and references therein), unique among globulars, with the possible exception of M22 (which may show an abundance spread, but much smaller than in ω Cen). In ω Cen the distribution of [Fe/H] has a floor near -- 2.0 to -- 1.8, presumably representing the initial metallicity of the gas out of which the cluster was formed, and shows an extended tail to higher metal abundances. The abundances of most elements increase with [Fe/H] and exhibit relatively small scatter, with the exception of O, Na, Al and some other light elements (Brown & Wallerstein 1993; Norris & Da Costa 1995b; Smith et al. 2000). As in other globular clusters, the giants of ω Cen have [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] abundances which are positively correlated with each other, but anticorrelated with [O/Fe] in a way that is most easily (but not definitively!) explained as a product of deep mixing. The abundance patterns of elements heavier than Fe suggest nucleosynthesis from AGB stars between 1 and 3M⊙, but whether this occurred during formation of the cluster that involved self-enrichment, or from mergers of fragments with different chemical abundances, is not yet determined. To date, only a few measurements of the 12C/13C isotopic ratio exist for ω Cen giants (3 from Brown & Wallerstein 1993). Their 3 values were all quite low, with 12C/13C= 6, 4, and 4; however, the metallicities sampled by these 3 giants was limited ([Fe/H]= -1.36, -1.34, and -1.26). The goal of this work is to derive additional values of 12C/13C in a larger sample of ω Cen giants, in order to investigate if there are any trends with [Fe/H], or if this somewhat unique globular cluster differs in its 12C/13C ratios when compared to other clusters. 2. Observations and Data Reduction The program stars were selected from the high-resolution study of Norris & Da Costa (1995b), and were chosen to cover a wide range of [Fe/H] at magnitudes where spectroscopy at 2.35µm was practical with a 4m telescope. Most of these stars also have other metallicity determinations from various studies employing low- to high-resolution spectra. Table 1 summarizes the available data for our targets. The first column of that table lists the name of each star from Woolley (1966). The second and third columns list photometry from several sources as assembled by Suntzeff & Kraft (1996); for three stars not tabulated in that paper (ROA 150, 155, and 161), we took the photometry from Cannon & Stobie (1973) and applied a reddening correction of E(B − V ) = 0.11 (Butler, Dickens, & Epps 1978). Infrared photometry from Persson et al. (1980) follows in column 4, while the remaining columns show determinations of [Fe/H] from papers listed in the table, all of which are evidently on the same metallicity scale (an exception are the values of Francois, Spite, & Spite (1988), not tabulated here, which are about 0.2 dex lower than in these other studies). We will use the Norris & Da Costa (1995b) values of [Fe/H] throughout the remainder of this paper. 2Throughout this paper, we will use the normal spectroscopic notation that [A/B] ≡ log10(NA/NB)star − log10(NA/NB)⊙, for elements A and B. -- 4 -- In Figure 1 we present a color-magnitude diagram of ω Cen. The small points show cluster members (≥ 50% membership probability) from van Leeuwen et al. (2000), where the photometry comes from sources referenced in that paper. The large symbols show photometry for our targets. Most of our stars are brighter than the magnitudes where the RGB and AGB are clearly separated, but most should be on the RGB since the evolutionary lifetimes there are much longer than on the AGB. An additional selection criteria was to observe stars that spanned the range of Na and Al abundances, which in ω Cen and other globular clusters are often anticorrelated with oxygen. Spectra of the first-overtone bands of CO near 2.3 µm were obtained on June 2 -- 4, 1996, and in a second run on June 10-12, 1998 with the Blanco 4m Telescope and the CTIO infrared spectrometer (DePoy et al. 1990). The 1996 run used an engineering-grade 256 × 256 InSb detector from SBRC which had many defective pixels and an appreciable dark current. The 1998 run employed a similar detector of higher quality, and also was obtained with a tip-tilt secondary. The length of the slit was 16′′, and the slit width was set to 0.7′′. The pixel size for both runs was 24 µm for a resolution of λ/∆λ ≈ 9900 pixel−1. The effective resolution was obtained from observations of telluric emission lines, which had an average FWHM of 2.7 pixels. A K filter was used for order separation. The 1996 observations were obtained in three overlapping wavelength intervals, which are shown in Table 2. In 1998, we obtained spectra at two wavelength settings. These covered the (2 -- 0), (3 -- 1), and (4 -- 2) bands of 12CO and the (3 -- 1) band of 13CO and also included features of Ca and Mg (Kleinman & Hall 1986); the latter are, however, very weak in our spectra of the ω Cen targets and will not be discussed further. Figure 2 shows two sample calibrated spectra and the identification of the more prominent features. These two giants have similar effective temperatures and metallicities, but note that ROA 155 has noticably stronger CO bands than ROA 139. Norris & Da Costa (1995b) classify ROA 139 as CN-strong and ROA 155 as CN-weak; the difference between the CN bandstrengths represents differences in the nitrogen abundance (Norris & Da Costa find [N/Fe]= +1.05 for ROA 139 and +0.40 for ROA 155). The differing CO bandstrengths observable in Figure 2 fit in with the C -- N anticorrelation expected from differing degrees of CN-cycle mixing. The observing procedure in both years was to obtain repeated spectra with the star placed at various locations along the slit. Exposure times ranged from 30 to 60 seconds at each position, and the motion of the star along the slit between exposures was sufficient to completely separate the spectra on the detector. In both runs, observations of a hot star (HD 116717, spectral type A0V) were interleaved with observations of the ω Cen targets. The observing procedure was identical to that used for the program stars, except that since HD 116717 was brighter, the exposure times were shorter and fewer positions along the slit were needed in order to achieve the same, or higher, S/N than in the ω Cen stars. Spectra were obtained for several stars at one wavelength interval, then repeated at the other wavelength settings. -- 5 -- Data reduction was performed using scripts written for the IRAF3 and VISTA packages. The images were first corrected for the nonlinear response of the detectors. The correction multiplied the raw counts by a quadratic polynomial in intensity. The correction was almost always less than 0.5%, but was 2 -- 3% at the center of the spectrum for the brightest stars. Next, the several images for each star were combined via a median, which removed the individual spectra. This was subtracted from the images, thereby correcting for the sky and the dark current. Finally, the images were divided by a flat field, which was obtained by combining many images of a white spot on the telescope dome, obtained in two passes with the dome lights on and off then subtracted. The resulting spectra were then traced, extracted in an aperture of width twice the FWHM of the spectra, and co-added after multiplicatively scaling to the average mean exposure. The co- adding process computed an average with rejection of pixels that were > 4σ away from the average. The deviation about the mean gave a measure of the S/N per spectrum, which was typically 75 to 120 for the ω Cen spectra. The final step was to correct for the many telluric absorption lines in the spectra using the observations of the spectra of the hot star. When hot star spectra were taken both before and after one of the ω Cen targets, we interpolated the spectra linearly in time to the midpoint of the target star's observation. If spectra were not available that bracketed an observation in ω Cen , we always had one adjacent to the observation. We measured the shift in the wavelength direction (in pixels) between the interpolated spectrum and the combined target spectrum to ensure that they were aligned correctly. The resulting pixel shifts were almost always less than 0.3 pixel. Then the object spectrum was divided by the interpolated spectrum. Because there are few lamp arc lines in the spectral intervals we observed, the wavelength calibration was achieved in several steps. We first computed the linear wavelength solution for the bluest observed wavelength interval in the 1996 spectra, in which there are several OH airglow lines that have wavelengths compiled by Oliva & Origlia (1992). The dispersion (µm pixel−1) from this solution was assumed to be the same for the other two wavelength intervals. We determined the zero point for the central wavelength interval by computing the average pixel shift between the two spectrum sections via cross correlation. Finally, the zero point for the red spectral interval was adjusted to match the the 3 -- 1, 2 -- 0 and 4 -- 2 bandheads of 12CO, where the wavelengths of these were taken from Kleinman & Hall (1986). A similar procedure was followed for the 1998 data, using the airglow lines in the blue spectra to set the dispersion for both wavelength intervals, then adjusting the zero point for the red spectra to match the 12CO bandheads. The r.m.s. residuals in the solutions using either the telluric lines or the CO bandheads were always less than 0.4 pixels. 3The IRAF software is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories under contract with the National Science Foundation -- 6 -- 3. The Carbon Isotopic Abundance Analysis An abundance analysis of the carbon isotopes, using the CO features, was carried out for the program stars using the most recent version of the LTE spectrum synthesis code MOOG (Sneden 1973). Model atmospheres were computed using a version of the MARCS code described in Gustafsson et al. (1975), and are plane parallel, hydrostatic equilibrium models. For the ω Cen giants spanning the range in temperature, gravity, and metallicity found here, the use of MARCS -- type models is appropriate, as discussed in a number of abundance studies, e.g., Smith et al. (2000), Ramirez et al. (2001), or Cunha et al. (2002). In addition, an analysis by Hinkle & Lambert (1975) of the formation of the CO vibration-rotation (V -- R) lines in the types of red-giant atmospheres studied here finds that these lines form to a high degree in LTE. As mentioned in the Introduction, all of the ω Cen program stars observed here were analyzed by Norris & Da Costa (1995b), thus detailed abundances from a number of elements are already available. The stellar parameters of effective temperature (Teff ), surface gravity (log g), micro- turbulence (ξ), and metallicity (taken as [Fe/H]) were derived by a combination of photometric and spectroscopic indicators, as discussed by Norris & Da Costa (1995b). A comparison of those parameters, with those derived independently by Smith et al. (2000) for a subset of the Norris & Da Costa (1995b) sample, is described in both Smith et al. (2000) and Cunha et al. (2002). No unexpected systematic errors or uncertainties are found and Teff , log g, ξ, and [Fe/H], as derived by Norris & Da Costa (1995b) are adopted here. Estimates of uncertainties in the stellar parameters, as discussed in the various abundance analysis papers mentioned above, are about ±100K in Teff , ±0.2 dex in log g, ±0.2 km s−1 in ξ, and ±0.05 dex in [Fe/H]. The adopted stellar parameters are shown in the beginning columns of Table 3. Spectral -- line lists covering the regions observed were constructed using the atomic linelist from the Kurucz & Bell (1995) dataset and CO lines from Goorvitch (1994). Lines due to CN in this spectral region were also included and were kindly provided by B. Plez (2001, provate communication). For giants with the temperatures and metallicities of our program stars, the CN lines are a minor contribution, even for very large nitrogen enhancements. In all of the program stars the C/O abundance ratio is less than 1.0 and CO formation is controlled primarily by the carbon abundance. Although the derived carbon abundance from CO depends slighty on the oxygen abundance, this dependence is not large for the temperature regime covered here and oxygen abundances are available from Norris & Da Costa (1995b), who used the [O I] λ6300A line. With a given O abundance and model atmosphere, the CO bands were synthesized as a function of carbon abundance. Synthetic spectra were calculated with wavelength increments of 0.01A (or λ/∆λ= 2.3×106) and smoothed with a Gaussian broadening function of 6.4A, corresponding to the measured widths of intrinsically narrow telluric emission lines. Typical internal stellar broadening mechanisms in these giants (thermal, microturbulence, and macroturbulence) are ∼ 0.8-1.0A at this wavelength, so instrumental broadening is by far the dominant term. The Gaussian smoothing function was found to provide excellent fits to the observed spectra. The 12C abundance was derived first, giving most weight to the regions covering the 12CO (3 -- 1) and (4 -- 2) bandheads, as -- 7 -- these are free from 13CO contamination and were found to be most sensitive to the carbon-12 abundance. A sample comparison and fit between observed and synthetic spectra is shown in Figure 3 for the star ROA155 ([Fe/H]= -1.64). The top panel shows the 12CO (3 -- 1) bandhead for three different 12C abundances. Straightforward least-squares residuals were used to select the best -- fit carbon abundance, and this abundance was rounded to the nearest 0.1 dex. Residuals were computed for regions covering ∼23225-23260A for 12CO (3 -- 1) and 23515-23550A for 12CO (4 -- 2). Each region contains about 17 data points, so the minimum sum of squared residuals was not affected significantly by a dew deviant points. The bottom panel illustrates the fit for the 13CO (2 -- 0) bandhead in this star, using the already derived 12C abundance; the 13C abundance is parameterized by the 12C/13C ratio and synthetic spectra computed for three different isotopic ratios are shown, with 12C/13C= 4.0 being the best fit. The interval for calculating residuals was ∼23447-23480A containing 16 or 17 data points: the resulting minima were not influenced significantly by the occasional noisy point. Isotopic ratios were rounded to the nearest 0.5. The primary uncertainties in the derived carbon isotopic abundances arise from uncertainties in the input stellar parameters Teff, log g, and microturbulence (the model metallicity has negligible effect on the derived abundances, unless the change in metallicity is substantial, i.e. factors of 10). Tests were done for parameter changes of 100K in effective temperature, 0.2 dex in log g, and 0.2 km s−1 in ξ, with the following results for the change in carbon-12 abundances: ∆Teff= +100K yields ∆C= +0.05 dex, ∆(log g)= +0.2 dex yields ∆C= +0.05 dex, and ∆ξ= +0.2 km s−1 yields ∆C= -0.04 dex. An additional uncertainty arises from the S/N of the spectra, and based on the depth and width of residual minima as a function of carbon abundance, a typical 1σ uncertainty is ±0.04 dex in ∆C. Compared to all of these errors, broadening adds an insignificant uncertainty as the total integrated absorption is conserved and red giants with these temperatures and abundances hasve flux points close to the continuum blueward of the 12CO (3-1) bandhead. Adding these abundance errors in quadrature provides an abundance uncertainty of ±0.09 dex for carbon. The isotopic ratios are very insensitive to the model parameters, but a conservative estimate based on testing various fits indicates that the ratio itself is uncertain by ±1.0 in 12C/13C. For all program stars here, Norris & Da Costa (1995b) derived 12C abundances from the violet CH bands, and a comparison is shown (with both our estimated errors and their estimated errors) in Figure 4. The comparison is quite good, with the mean difference (Us -- Norris & Da Costa) being +0.14 ±0.24 dex. One star, ROA 139, is the only giant to show a discrepancy (we find [C/Fe]= -1.13 while Norris & Da Costa derive -0.50). It is worth noting that this star has the most extreme nitrogen abundance found by Norris & Da Costa, with [N/Fe]=+1.05. In a plot of [N/Fe] versus [C/Fe], assembled from the Norris & Da Costa abundances, ROA 139 stands out as falling well above their mean relation (i.e., quite a large [N/Fe] ratio for their value of [C/Fe]). Simply extrapolating their [N/Fe] -- [C/Fe] relation to a large value of [N/Fe] would suggest that ROA 139 should have a very low [C/Fe] ratio (≤ -1.0), as we find. It may be that at very low carbon abundances, the violet CH-band becomes quite weak. The Norris & Da Costa estimated uncertainties of ±0.21 dex, coupled with our uncertainties -- 8 -- of ±0.10 dex (in [C/Fe], assuming an uncertainty of 0.05 dex in Fe), yield an expected scatter of 0.23 dex, close to the observed value of 0.24 dex. The small offset of +0.14 dex in the absolute abundance scale probably arises from small differences in the gf-value scales between CH and CO, as well as a possible small difference in the adopted solar carbon abundance. A recent value for the solar carbon abundance is by Holweger (2001), who finds log ǫ(C)= 8.59. This abundance can be checked from a solar analysis using the same CO lines as those used in our ω Cen analysis. We generated a MARCS solar model (Teff = 5777K, log g= 4.438) with a microturbulent velocity of 1.0 km s−1 (this value of ξ yields our preferred iron abundance of log ǫ(Fe)=7.50) from an analysis of both Fe I and Fe II lines with well-defined laboratory oscillator strengths, and is the same solar Fe abundance adopted by Norris & Da Costa (1995b), whose ω Cen Fe-abundance scale is used here). The solar flux spectrum used is that from Wallace & Hinkle (1996), which has a spectral resolution of λ/∆λ= 261,000. Syntheses of the same regions used in the ω Cen analysis (23225-23260A and 23515-23550A) were examined and the best solar 12C abundance derived from the 12CO lines (using a MARCS model) is logǫ(C)= 8.55: this is close enough to the Holweger (2001) value that we will adopt 8.59 as the solar 12C abundance. the two respective solar Fe abundances are the same, with log ǫ(Fe)= 7.50). This comparison indicates that the carbon isotopic abundances presented here do not suffer from significant systematic effects. The carbon-12 abundances, as well as the 12C/13C ratios are listed in Table 3. The [Fe/H] values from Norris & Da Costa (1995b) are used to also tabulate values of [12C/Fe]. 4. Results and Discussion An initial investigation into the isotopic carbon abundance ratios in these ω Cen giants is illustrated in Figure 5. In the top panel, 12C/13C ratios are plotted as a function of [Fe/H] for various samples of metal-poor giants. A number of globular clusters have been analyzed for isotopic carbon ratios and we include in this discussion the results from Smith & Suntzeff (1989) and Suntzeff & Smith (1991) for M4 (39 giants), Suntzeff & Smith (1991) for NGC6752 (12 giants), Bell, Briley, & Smith (1991) for 47 Tuc (4 giants), and Briley et al. (1997) for M71 (10 giants). In addition, samples of field stars have been analyzed and new results, as well as a summary of earlier work, have been presented most recently by Keller, Pilachowski, & Sneden (2001): these results are also included in the comparisons. Concentrating first on the ω Cen giants, there is no significant trend of 12C/13C with [Fe/H], and all member giants show evidence of deep mixing. Two of the more metal-poor ω Cen giants have slightly larger ratios (6 for ROA 252 and 7 for ROA 58), however, the overall carbon abundances in these particular stars are quite low and the CO bands weaker. The 13CO bands in these two giants are weaker than in the other program stars, thus the uncertainties are probably somewhat larger: before a trend could be claimed, a larger sample of ω Cen giants would need to be studied. With the current results, no real trend with [Fe/H] is found for the ω Cen members. In general, the ω Cen results look very similar to what is found for the other globular clusters, -- 9 -- with the following note: the two fairly metal-rich clusters, M71 and 47 Tuc, appear to have sub- stantial fractions of their members with both slightly high (12C/13C ∼ 7-8) and low (12C/13C ∼ 4) ratios. Briley et al. (1997) have shown that these ratios are anticorrelated with CN band strengths (the CN-strong giants have lower 12C/13C ratios and the CN-weak giants have higher ratios). This dichotomy is not seen in the somewhat more metal-poor clusters M4 and NGC 6752 (although this cluster does have 1 giant in the sample of 12 with a high ratio and it is one of the CN-weak stars). No measurable effect in the C-isotopic ratios as a function of CN strength is found for ω Cen: 12C/13C = 4.9 ± 0.8 and 3.5 ± 0.5 (m.e.) for the CN-weak and CN-strong stars, respectively: a difference of only 1.5σ. An additional observation that should be noted about the top panel of Figure 5 is that the field-star sample contains a number of quite metal-poor giants with 12C/13C ratios of about 8-10, somewhat higher than most of the globular-cluster giants. This point is addressed in the bottom panel of Figure 5, where 12C/13C is plotted versus absolute visual magnitude. The field giants with the slightly larger C-isotopic ratios tend to be somewhat less luminous than the globular-cluster sample. The luminosity dependence of 12C/13C is discussed by Keller et al. (2001) and the isotopic ratios in the more luminous field giants overlap perfectly with the globular-cluster giants. Again, the ω Cen member ROA 58 (with 12C/13C= 7.0) stands out somewhat in this plot; however, as discussed above, this giant has a low carbon abundance and the CO bands are weak: better spectra would need to be obtained, or more ω Cen giants observed, in order to decide whether this result for ROA 58 is real or significant. The conclusion from this study is that for these rather luminous ω Cen giants, with MV≤ -1.8, there is no measurable change in 12C/13C versus [Fe/H]. As discussed in Section 3, the absolute carbon abundances can also be derived fairly accurately for these giants from the CO bands. In Figure 6, a number of isotopic and elemental abundance ratios are plotted versus [12C/Fe] (hereafter [C/Fe]): the carbon-12 abundance is predicted to decrease as the envelope fraction of CN-processed material increases. In the mixing scenario a lower [C/Fe] corresponds to deeper mixing, while in the primordial scenario it results from incresed pollution from material processed through presumed progenitor stars. The top left panel in Figure 6 shows 12C/13C versus [C/Fe] for ω Cen and a number of other samples. Concentrating on the ω Cen members for the moment, no trend is found, with all ω Cen giants having low 12C/13C ratios, indicative of envelope material heavily exposed to the CN-cycle, and 12C to Fe ratios spanning about a factor of 10. Correlations between 12C, O, and Na are explored in the bottom left and top right panels of Figure 6. In these panels there is clear correlation between [O/Fe] versus [C/Fe] and an anti-correlation between [Na/Fe] versus [C/Fe] (the Na and O abundances for ω Cen are from Norris & Da Costa 1995b). As discussed in the Introduction, these are the trends expected for material exposed to H-burning. Anticorrelations between [Na/Fe] and [O/Fe], are found in many globular clusters, e.g., Langer, Hoffman, & Sneden (1993), Kraft et al. (1993), Pilachowski et al. (1996), or Kraft et al. (1998). One interpretation of these Na -- O anticorrelations is deep mixing in the currently observed giants, although Briley et al (1996) find Na-CN anticorrelations in 47 Tuc turnoff stars, while Cannon et al. (1998) find C-N anticorrelations in 47 Tuc main-sequence -- 10 -- stars, and Gratton et al. (2001) have found Na -- O anticorrelations in main-sequence members of NGC6752. The ultimate origins of these various abundance correlations and anticorrelations observed in a number of globular clusters are still not understood completely. Other globular clusters are plotted in Figure 6 as comparisons to ω Cen. In the top left panel, results are available for five other clusters, as well as field stars. Omega Cen does not obviously stand out relative to the other globular clusters. In the bottom left panel of Figure 6 results for the clusters M4 and M71 are compared to those from ω Cen; the [O/Fe] values for M4 are from Ivans et al. (1999) and for M71 from Briley et al. (1997). Oxygen abundances are not available for the samples we are using as comparisons for NGC6752 and 47 Tuc. All three globular clusters plotted show a large degree of overlap in the trend of oxygen versus carbon; however, ω Cen displays a larger range in values of both [C/Fe] and [O/Fe]. Along a similar line, the top right panel of Figure 6 shows [Na/Fe] versus [C/Fe] for the ω Cen stars, along with the M4 sample (with the [Na/Fe] coming from Ivans et al. 1999). An anticorrelation of Na and C is found in both clusters and the trends are, within the uncertainties, identical. Again, though, ω Cen displays a larger range in values of [Na/Fe] relative to M4. Greater differences in [C/Fe], [O/Fe], and [Na/Fe] could indicate either deeper mixing (in the mixing scenario) or, on the other hand, larger amounts of pollution from material processed through H-burning (in the primordial scenario). In a recent study of M71, Ramirez & Cohen (2002) have summarized [Na/Fe] and [O/Fe] trends for 11 globular clusters (their Figure 12) and these different clusters display a range in their respective values of both [Na/Fe] and [O/Fe]. If this range is quantified simply as the difference between the largest and smallest values, a weak trend is found between a larger range in [Na/Fe] and [O/Fe] with decreasing [Fe/H]. It is not clear how ω Cen fits into this possible trend, as these other clusters have no spread in [Fe/H], whereas the spread in ω Cen exceeds a factor of 20; however the range in O and Na to Fe ratios displayed by ω Cen members is as large as any found in the other globular clusters, with M13 and M92 showing the largest ranges. A somewhat different type of chemical behavior is probed in the bottom-right panel of Figure 6, where a slow neutron-capture (s-process) element (La) is plotted versus [C/Fe] for both ω Cen and M4. Omega Cen is peculiar in that its member stars display a large increase, in proportion to Fe, of s-process elements as [Fe/H] increases: such behavior is not observed in any other stellar population. The increase in s-process abundances originates from thermally-pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) stars, and the cause of their apparently large contribution to the chemical evolution in ω Cen (Lloyd Evans 1983) remains a mystery, although speculation as to the reason can be found in Smith et al. (2000) and Cunha et al. (2002). In this panel no trend is found between [La/Fe] and [C/Fe], indicating that the sources of La enrichment and C depletion are not related. The more La-poor giants in ω Cen again overlap perfectly with their counterparts in M4. Possible correlations of 12C/13C with abundances of three elements either destroyed (O) or produced (Na and Al) by various proton capture cycles are explored in Figure 7. The top panel plots the isotopic carbon ratios versus [O/Fe] for ω Cen, M4, and M71. In the regions of overlap between these three globular clusters, there is excellent agreement between 12C/13C ratios and -- 11 -- [O/Fe] abundance ratios. When taken together, the three cluster samples hint of a correlation between 12C/13C and [O/Fe]. This possible trend needs to be verified by future studies of larger samples, but it may point towards a deep-mixing signature in the current globular cluster giants. The bottom two panels, with 12C/13C versus [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] show no hint of any trend. This is somewhat puzzling in light of the possible trend of the carbon isotopic ratio with [O/Fe]. The deeper and more extensive mixing necessary to enhance the [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] ratios, would be expected to drive the envelope C-isotope ratios to their CN-equilibrium value of 3.5: this is not observed. The lack of any correlation between 12C/13C and Na or Al points to the origins of some of these abundance variations as arising in some other site, and not in the current cluster giants, as concluded earlier by Briley et al. (1997). A larger sample of 12C, 13C, O, Na, and Al abundances from globular cluster giants would be able to shed more light on this issue. 5. Conclusions The 12C/13C ratios in all of the ω Cen giants are quite low, with a mean h12C/13Ci = 4.3±0.4: this indicates extensive and deep mixing in these low-mass, low-metallicity giants. This result is in general agreement with previous studies of globular cluster giants, as well as low-metallicity field giants. In particular for the ω Cen giants, all of which have MV≤ -1.8, there is no meaurable change in 12C/13C over the metallicity range of [Fe/H]= -1.7 to -0.7. It is found that [12C/Fe] correlates well with [O/Fe] and anticorrelates with [Na/Fe], and that the overall trends among these various ratios agrees very well between ω Cen and other globular clusters. The 12C/13C ratios themselves exhibit no measurable trends with [Na/Fe] or [Al/Fe], but may hint at a positive correlation with [O/Fe]. We wish to thank the staff of the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, especially M. Fern´andez and H. Tirado, for their excellent assistance with the observations. Partial support for this project came from the National Science Foundation under grants AST-9157038 and INT- 9215844 to The Ohio State University Research Foundation. VVS acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation through grant AST-9987374. REFERENCES Bell, R. A., Briley, M. M., and Smith, G. H. 1990, AJ, 100, 187 Bell, R. A., Hesser, J. E., & Cannon, R. D. 1983, ApJ, 269, 580 Briley, M. M., Hesser, J. E., & Bell, R. A. 1991, ApJ, 373, 482 Briley, M. M., Bell, R. A., Hesser, J. E., & Smith, G. H. 1994, Canadian J. Phys. 72, 772 -- 12 -- Briley, M. M., Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N. B., Lambert, D. L., Bell, R. A., & Hesser, J. E. 1996, Nature, 383, 604 Briley, M. M., Smith, V. V., King, J., & Lambert, D. L. 1997, AJ, 113, 306 Brown, J. A., & Wallerstein, G. 1993, AJ, 106, 133 Butler, D., Dickens, R. J., & Epps, E. 1978, ApJ, 225, 148 Cannon, R. D., & Stobie, R. S. 1973, MNRAS, 162, 207 Cannon, R. D., Croke, B. F. W., Bell, R. A., Hesser, J. E., & Stathakis, R. A. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 601 Charbonnel, C. 1994, A&A, 282, 811 Charbonnel, C., Brown, J. A., & Wallerstein, G. 1998, A&A, 332, 204 Cottrell, P. L., & Da Costa, G. S. 1981, ApJ, 245, L79 Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N. B., Norris, J. E., Da Costa, G. S., & Plez, B. 2002, AJ, submitted DePoy, D. L., Gregory, B., Elias, J., Montan´e, A., P´erez, G., & Smith, R. M. 1990, PASP, 102, 1433 Francois, P., Spite, M., & Spite, F. A&A, 191, 267 Gonzalez, G., & Wallerstein, G. 1998, AJ, 116, 765 Goorvitch, D. 1994, ApJS, 92, 311 Gratton, R. G., Sneden, C., Carretta, E., & Bragaglia, A. 2000, A&A, 354, 169 Gratton, R. G., Bonifacio, P., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., Castellani, V., Centurion, M., Chieffi, A., Claudi, R., Clementini, G., D'Antona, F., Desidera, S., Francois, P., Grundahl, F., Lucatello, S., Molaro, P., Pasquini, L., Sneden, C., Spite, F., Straniero, O. 2001, a, 369, 87 Gustafsson, B. E., Bell, R. A., Eriksson, K., & Nordlund, A. 1975, a, 42, 407 Hinkle, K. H., & Lambert, D. L. 1975, MNRAS, 170, 447 Holweger, H. 2001, in Solar and Galactic Composition, ed. R. F. Wimmer-Schweingruber (American Institute of Physics: New York), p.23 Iben, Jr., I. 1964, ApJ, 140, 1631 Ivans, I. I., Sneden, C., Kraft, R. P., Suntzeff, N. B., Smith, V. V., Langer, G. E., & Fulbright, J. P. 1999, AJ, 118, 1273 -- 13 -- Keller, L. D., Pilachowski, C. A., & Sneden, C. 2001, AJ, 122, 2554 Kleinmann, S. G., & Hall, D. N. B. 1986, ApJS, 62, 501 Kraft, R. P., Sneden, C., Langer, G. E., & Shetrone, M. D. 1993, AJ, 106, 1490 Kraft, R. P. 1994, PASP, 106, 553 Kraft, R. P., Sneden, C., Smith, G. G., Shetrone, M. D., Langer, G. E., & Pilachowski, C. A. 1997, AJ, 113, 279 Kraft, R. P., Sneden, C., Smith, G. H., Shetrone, M. D., & Fulbright, J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1500 Kurucz, R. L., & Bell, B. 1995, CD-ROM 23 (Cambridge: SAO) Langer, G. E., Hoffman, R., & Sneden, C. 1993, PASP, 105, 301 Lloyd Evans, T. 1983, MNRAS, 204, 975 Norris, J. E., & Da Costa, G. S. 1995a, ApJ, 441, L81 Norris, J. E., & Da Costa, G. S. 1995b, ApJ, 447, 680 Norris, J. E., Freeman, K. C., & Mighell, K. J. 1996, ApJ, 462, 241 Oliva, E., & Origlia, L. 1992, A&A, 254, 466 Paltoglou, G., & Norris, J. E., 1989, ApJ, 336, 185 Persson, S. E., Cohen, J. G., Matthews, K., Frogel, J. A., & Aaronson, M. 1980, ApJ, 235, 452 Pilachowski, C. A., Sneden, C., & Kraft, R. P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1689 Ramirez, S. V., Sellgren, K., Carr, J. S., Balachandran, S. C., Blum, R., Terndrup, D. M., & Steed, A. 2000, ApJ, 537, 205 Ramirez, S. V., & Cohen, J. G. 2002, AJ, 123, 3277 Shetrone, M. D. 1996a, AJ, 112, 1517 Shetrone, M. D. 1996b, AJ, 112, 2639 Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N. B., Cunha, K., Gallino, R., Busso, M., Lambert, D. L., & Straniero, O. 2000, AJ, 119, 1239 Sneden, C. 1973, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Texas Sneden, C., Kraft, R. P., Shetrone, M. D., Smith, G. H., Langer, G. E., & Prosser, C. F. 1997, AJ, 114, 1964 -- 14 -- Suntzeff, N. B., & Kraft, R. P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1913 Suntzeff, N. B., & Smith, V. V. 1991, ApJ, 381, 160 van Leeuwen, F., Le Poole, R. S., Reijns, R. A., Freeman, K. C., & de Zeeuw, P. T. 2000, A&A, 360, 472 Wallerstein, G., Iben, Jr., I., Parker, P., Boesgaard, A. M., Hale, G. M., Champagne, A. E., Barnes, C. A., Kappeler, F., Smith, V. V., Hoffman, R. D., Timmes, F. X., Sneden, C., Boyd, R. N., Meyer, B. S., Lambert, D. L. 1997, Rev.Mod.Phys., 69, 995 Wasserburg, G. J., Boothroyd, A. I., & Sackmann, I.-J. 1995, ApJ, 447, L37 Woolley, R. v.d.R. 1966, R. Obs. Ann., No. 2 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0. -- 15 -- Fig. 1. -- Color-magnitude diagram for proper motion members of omega Cen from van Leeuwen et al. (2000), shown as small symbols. The photometry for the stars in the current sample are shown as large points. Fig. 2. -- Sample spectra of two ω Cen giants. Both of these giants have similar effective temper- atures and metallicities ([Fe/H]). The prominent 12CO and 13CO bands are identified and most of the structure observed as a function of wavelength is real (being composed of many CO vibration- rotation lines). The spectra are normalized and shifted in relative flux so both can be viewed clearly. Note that ROA 139 has weaker CO bands than ROA 155, indicating a lower total carbon abundance in ROA 139, although both have quite low isotopic ratios (12C/13C=4.5 for ROA 155 and 3.5 for ROA 139). Fig. 3. -- Observed (solid dots) and synthetic (continuous curves) spectra for the ω Cen giant ROA155 (Teff = 4200K, log g= 0.8, ξ= 2.0 km s−1, and [Fe/H]= -1.64). The top panel shows a region near the 12CO (3-1) bandhead, with synthetic spectra calculated for three different 12C abundances (the best-fit abundance and ±0.1 dex). The abundance notation A(x)= log ǫ(x)= log(Nx/NH + 12.0 is used. The bottom panel shows the 13CO (2-0) bandhead region with three synthetic spectra computed with three different isotopic carbon abundance ratios. Fig. 4. -- A comparison of carbon-12 abundances (plotted as [12C/Fe]) derived here using CO and derived by Norris & Da Costa (1995b) using violet CH. The solid line illustrates perfect agreement. Errorbars are taken from the discussions in Norris & Da Costa and here. The agreement between the two studies is good, with a mean difference of (This Study -- Norris & Da Costa)= +0.14± 0.24 dex: the scatter is that expected given the respective errors in each study. Fig. 5. -- Isotopic carbon abundance ratios are plotted as a function of [Fe/H] (top panel) and absolute visual magnitude (bottom panel) for the different samples of metal-poor giants. There are no strong trends with metallicity, although it should be noted that the scatter in 12C/13C in the more metal-rich globular clusters M71 and 47 Tuc is anticorrelated with the CN strengths (Briley et al. 1997). The field sample also contains a number of giants with somewhat higher isotopic ratios (∼9 -- 10) at lower metallicities; however, the bottom panel reveals these field giants to be of somewhat lower luminosities than most of the globular cluster giants analyzed. The bottom panel reveals a modest trend of decreasing 12C/13C as the giant's luminosity increases (as discussed by Keller et al. 2001): the globular cluster giants fall on the same trend defined by the field-giant population. Fig. 6. -- Comparisons of four different abundance ratios versus [12C/Fe]. The top left panel shows 12C/13C versus [12C/Fe] for ω Cen and a number of different samples of low-metallicity giants. No strong trends are evident, with all giants mixed extensively. The bottom left panel shows correlations between [O/Fe] and [12C/Fe] in three globular clusters: ω Cen, M4, and M71. The respective trends for all three clusters overlap and the correlation of depleted carbon-12 with oxygen is a signature of material processed through the CNO cycles. The top left panel illustrates -- 16 -- the anticorrelation between [Na/Fe] and [12C/Fe] in ω Cen and M4, again with substantial overlap in the two clusters. The decrease in carbon-12 is due to mixing, while the increase in sodium is due, presumably, to the Na -- Ne cycle. The bottom right panel explores the relation between lanthanum, an s-process element, and 12C in ω Cen and M4. No trends exist, indicating that the mixing responsible for 12C depletion has no dependance on the s-process production site. Fig. 7. -- An investigation of possible trends of 12C/13C with O, Na, and Al. In the top panel isotopic carbon ratios are plotted versus [O/Fe] for ω Cen, M4, and M71. The three globular clusters together indicate a possible systematic decrease, towards the CN-equilibrium value, in 12C/13C as [O/Fe] decreases: this might signify deep mixing in the observed giants. The middle and bottom panels show 12C/13C versus [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe], respectively, with no measurable trends between these abundance ratios. 10 11 12 13 14 15 V 0 .5 1 B − V 1.5 2 { { Table . Program Star Photometry and Metallicities Star (ROA) V (B (cid:0) V ) (V (cid:0) K ) [Fe/H] [Fe/H] [Fe/H] [Fe/H] a b c d . . . {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. . . . {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) . . . {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) e e . . . (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. . . . (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) . . . (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. e . . . {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) . . (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) . . . {. {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) . . . {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) {. f . . . {. {. (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) a Suntze(cid:11) & Kraft ( ). Norris & Da Costa ( ). b c Smith et al. (). d Other determinations of [Fe/H] as follows: Paltoglou & Norris ( ). e f Brown & Wallerstein ( ). l x u F e v i t a e R l 2 1.5 1 .5 ROA 155 ROA 139 0 23100 23200 23300 23400 23500 23600 { { Table . Observed wavelength intervals ((cid:22)m) Spectrum (cid:21)(min) (cid:21)(max) (cid:1)(cid:21) a data blue . . : (cid:2) central . . (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) red . . (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) data (cid:0) (cid:0) blue . . : (cid:2) red . . (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) a Derived for this spectrum interval and assumed to apply to the others. l x u F e v i t l a e R l x u F e v i t l a e R ROA 155 1 .8 .6 23200 23220 23240 23260 23280 23300 ROA 155 1.1 1 .9 .8 .7 23400 23420 23440 23460 23480 23500 { { Table . Program Star Parameters & Isotopic Carbon Abundances Star (ROA) T (K) Log g (cm s ) (cid:24) (km s ) A( C) [ C/Fe] C/ C e(cid:11) (cid:0) (cid:0) a b . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . -. . . . . +. . . . . -. . a A( C)= log (cid:15)( C)= log[N( C)/N(H)] + . b This ratio is computed using solar abundances of A( C)= . and A(Fe)= ., with [Fe/H] for the star taken from Norris & Da Costa ( b) .5 0 -.5 -1 -1.5 -1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 M4 M71 47 Tuc NGC6752 Field 15 10 5 0 -2.5 -2 -1.5 [Fe/H] -1 -.5 15 10 5 0 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 M4 M71 47 Tuc NGC6752 Field 15 10 5 .5 0 -.5 ] e F O / [ 1 .5 0 1.5 1 .5 0 ] / e F a N [ ] e F a L / [ -1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 -1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 [C/Fe] [C/Fe] 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -.8 M4 M71 -.6 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 [O/Fe] 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 -.2 -.4 [Na/Fe] 1.4 1.2 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 -.2 [Al/Fe]
astro-ph/9503089	1	9503	1995-03-24T19:52:59	High Redshift Lyman Limit and Damped Lyman-Alpha Absorbers	[ "astro-ph" ]	We have obtained high signal:to:noise optical spectroscopy at 5\AA\ resolution of 27 quasars from the APM z$>$4 quasar survey. The spectra have been analyzed to create new samples of high redshift Lyman-limit and damped Lyman-$\alpha$ absorbers. These data have been combined with published data sets in a study of the redshift evolution and the column density distribution function for absorbers with $\log$N(HI)$\ge17.5$, over the redshift range 0.01 $<$ z $<$ 5. The main results are: \begin{itemize} \item Lyman limit systems: The data are well fit by a power law $N(z) = N_0(1 + z)^{\gamma}$ for the number density per unit redshift. For the first time intrinsic evolution is detected in the product of the absorption cross-section and comoving spatial number density for an $\Omega = 1$ Universe. We find $\gamma = 1.55$ ($\gamma = 0.5$ for no evolution) and $N_0 = 0.27$ with $>$99.7\% confidence limits for $\gamma$ of 0.82 \& 2.37. \item Damped \lya systems: The APM QSOs provide a substantial increase in the redshift path available for damped surveys for $z>3$. Eleven candidate and three confirmed damped Ly$\alpha$ absorption systems, have been identified in the APM QSO spectra covering the redshift range $2.8\le z \le 4.4$ (11 with $z>3.5$). Combining the APM survey confirmed and candidate damped \lya absorbers with previous surveys, we find evidence for a turnover at z$\sim$3 or a flattening at z$\sim$2 in the cosmological mass density of neutral gas, $\Omega_g$. \end{itemize} The Lyman limit survey results are published in Storrie-Lombardi, et~al., 1994, ApJ, 427, L13. Here we describe the results for the DLA population of absorbers.	astro-ph	astro-ph	High Redshift Lyman Limit and Damped Lyman-Alpha Absorbers L.J. Storrie-Lombardi1,2, R.G. McMahon1,5, M.J. Irwin3, C. Hazard1,4 1 Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA UK 2 current address: UCSD-CASS, Mail Code 0111, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA [email protected] 3Royal Greenwich Observatory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE UK [email protected] 4University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA 5 [email protected] 5 9 9 1 r a M 4 2 1 v 9 8 0 3 0 5 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a To appear in "ESO Workshop on QSO Absorption Lines" Preprint: astro-ph/yymmddd Abstract We have obtained high signal:to:noise optical spectroscopy at 5A resolution of 27 quasars from the APM z>4 quasar survey. The spectra have been analyzed to create new samples of high redshift Lyman-limit and damped Lyman-α absorbers. These data have been combined with published data sets in a study of the redshift evolution and the column density distribution function for absorbers with logN(HI)≥ 17.5, over the redshift range 0.01 < z < 5. The main results are: • Lyman limit systems: The data are well fit by a power law N (z) = N0(1 + z)γ for the number density per unit redshift. For the first time intrinsic evolution is detected in the product of the absorption cross-section and comoving spatial number density for an Ω = 1 Universe. We find γ = 1.55 (γ = 0.5 for no evolution) and N0 = 0.27 with >99.7% confidence limits for γ of 0.82 & 2.37. • Damped Lyα systems: The APM QSOs provide a substantial increase in the redshift path available for damped surveys for z > 3. Eleven candidate and three confirmed damped Lyα absorption systems, have been identified in the APM QSO spectra covering the redshift range 2.8 ≤ z ≤ 4.4 (11 with z > 3.5). Combining the APM survey confirmed and candidate damped Lyα absorbers with previous surveys, we find evidence for a turnover at z∼3 or a flattening at z∼2 in the cosmological mass density of neutral gas, Ωg. The Lyman limit survey results are published in Storrie-Lombardi, et al., 1994, ApJ, 427, L13. Here we describe the results for the DLA population of absorbers. 1 Introduction How and when galaxies formed are questions at the forefront of work in observational cos- mology. Absorption systems detected in quasar spectra provide the means to study these phenomena up to z∼5, back to when the Universe was less than 10% of its present age. While the baryonic content of spiral galaxies that are observed in the present epoch is concentrated in stars, in the past this must have been in the form of gas. Damped Lyα absorption (DLA) systems have neutral hydrogen column densities of N(HI)> 2 × 1020cm−2. They dominate the baryonic mass contributed by HI. The principal gaseous component in spirals is HI which 1 has led to surveys for absorption systems detected by the DLA they produce (Wolfe, Turn- shek, Smith & Cohen 1986 [WTSC]; Lanzetta et al. 1991 [LWTLMH]; Lanzetta, Wolfe & Turnshek 1995 [LWT95]). We extend the earlier work on Lyman limit systems and DLAs to higher redshifts using observations of QSOs from the APM z>4 QSO survey (Irwin, McMa- hon & Hazard 1991), These data more than triple the redshift path surveyed at z>3 and allow the first systematic study up to z=4.5. 2 APM Damped Lyman-Alpha Survey at z∼4 We have obtained 27 high S/N spectra at 5A resolution at the William Herschel Telescope. The spectra were analyzed starting 3000 km s−1 blueward of z(emission). The analysis was stopped when the S/N ratio became too low to detect a Lyα line with W(rest)≥5A. This point was typically caused by the incidence of a Lyman limit system. Features with ∼ 25A were selected with an automated procedure. Most of these are blends W(observed) > of the dense Lyα forest features present at high redshift. The equivalent width and FWHM were measured interactively and N(HI) was estimated for features with W or FWHM >30A. Of the 34 measured, 15 have estimated N(HI)≥ 2 × 1020 cm−2 covering 2.8 ≤ z ≤ 4.4. Only one candidate has estimated N(HI)≥ 1021 cm−2. High resolution spectroscopy of 4 candidates has confirmed 3 as damped (log N(HI)≥20.3). The sensitivity of the survey with redshift was determined using the method developed by Lanzetta (see LWT95). The function g(z) is calculated, giving the number of lines of sight along which a damped system at a redshift z could be detected. Figure 1a shows the sensitivity of the APM survey alone and in combination with the WTSC and LWTLMH surveys. 3 Evolution of the Number Density per Unit Redshift The candidate and confirmed DLA systems from the APM sample and previous surveys (WTSC; LWTLMH; LWT95) have been combined to study the evolution of the number density per unit redshift for 0.01 < z < 4.7. Fit with the customary power law N(z) = N0(1 + z)γ, a population with no intrinsic evolution in the product of the absorption cross- section and comoving spatial number density will have γ = 1/2 (Ω = 1) or γ = 1 (Ω = 0). A maximum likelihood fit to the data with z>1.5 yields N(z) = 0.03(1 + z)1.5±0.6, consistent with no intrinsic evolution even though the value of γ is similar to that found for the Lyman limit systems where evolution is detected at a significant level. However, there is redshift evolution evident in the higher column density systems with an apparent decline in N(z) for z>3.5. These results are displayed in figure 1(b). The combined data set is plotted as dashed lines with the above fit. The results for only the absorbers with log N(HI)≥ 21 are shown as solid lines. The z<1.5 bin is taken from LWT95. 2 4 Evolution of Ωg -- Baryons in Neutral Gas The mean cosmological mass density contributed by damped Lyα absorbers can be estimated as Nf (N)dN Nmin hΩgi = H0µmH cρcrit Z ∞ as defined in LWTLMH (equations 17-18), giving the current mass density in units of the current critical density. The errors in Ωg are difficult to estimate because the column density distribution function, f (N), is not known. LWTLMH utilised the standard error in the distribution of N(HI) which yields zero error if all the column densities in a bin are the same. We have estimated the fractional variance in Ωg as Pp i=1 Ni)2 which yields √n errors if all the column densities included in a bin are equal. This method yields larger errors. The results for Ωg are shown in figure 2 for q0=0 and q0=0.5 (H0=50). The z<1.5 bin is taken from LWT95. The z>1.5 solid bins utilise the data from WTSC, LWTLMH, and the APM survey. The dotted bins exclude the APM data. The inclusion of the APM survey data for z > 3 lowers the value previously found for 3 < z < 3.5 and indicates a possible turnover for z > 3.5. The results are also consistent with a relatively constant value of Ωg for z > 2 as the error bars are still very large at high redshift. Larger samples of bright z > 4 quasars are needed. i /(Pp i=1 N 2 5 Summary The QSOs from the APM survey more than triple the z > 3 redshift path for DLA surveys. Fourteen candidate DLA systems have been identified in the APM spectra covering 2.8 ≤ z ≤ 4.4 (11 with z > 3.5), with 3 confirmed. Combining these data with the previous surveys and fitting a single power law for z>1.5 gives N(z)= .03(1 + z)1.5±0.6, marginally consistent with no evolution models. Evolution is evident in the highest column density absorbers ∼ 3.5. We find with the incidence of systems with log N(HI)≥21 apparently decreasing for z > evidence for a turnover or flattening in the cosmological mass density of neutral gas, Ωg at high redshift. The more gradual evolution of Ωg than previously found helps alleviate the 'cosmic G-dwarf problem' (LWT95), i.e. if a large amount of star formation has taken place between z=3.5 and z=2, a much larger percentage of low metallicity stars should exist than is detected. It is also consistent with the suggestion by Pettini et al. (1994) that the wide range in DLA metallicities measured at the same epoch indicates that at z∼2 they are observed prior to the bulk of star formation in the disk. 3 References [1] Gnedin, N.Y. & Ostriker, J.P., 1992, ApJ, 400,1 [2] Irwin, M.J., McMahon, R.G. & Hazard, C., 1991, in ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 21, ed. Crampton D., (San Francisco: ASP), 117 [3] Lanzetta, K.M., Wolfe, A.M., Turnshek, D.A., Lu, L., McMahon, R.G. & Hazard, C., 1991, ApJS, 77, 1 (LTWLMH) [4] Lanzetta, K.M., Wolfe, A.M. & Turnshek, D.A., 1995, ApJ, 440, 435 (LWT95) [5] Pettini, M., Smith, L.J., Hunstead, R.W. & King, D.L., 1994, ApJ, 426, 79 [6] Rao, S. & Briggs, F., 1993, ApJ, 419, 515 [7] Storrie-Lombardi, L.J., McMahon, R.G., Irwin, M.J. & Hazard 1994, ApJ, 427, L13 [8] Wolfe, A.M., Turnshek, D.A., Smith, H.E. & Cohen R.D., 1986, ApJS, 61, 249 (WTSC) Figure Captions Figure 1: (a) The sensitivity function, g(z), of the DLA surveys. This gives the number of lines of sight along which a damped system at redshift z could be detected. (b) The number density of DLA per unit redshift, N(z), vs. z(absorption). The dashed bins show N(z) for all the damped systems and the solid bins for systems with N(HI)≥ 1021 cm−2. A single power law fit to the sample for z>1.5 gives N(z)= .03(1 + z)1.5±0.6. Figure 2: The mean cosmological mass density in neutral gas, Ωg, contributed by DLA absorbers for 0.01≤z≤4.7 for q0=0 and q0=0.5 (H0=50). The z<1.5 bin is taken from LWT95. The z>1.5 solid bins utilise the WTSC, LWTLMH, and APM survey data. The dotted bins exclude the APM data. The points at z=0 are Ωstars (star) from Gnedin & Ostriker (1992) and ΩHI (circle) from Rao & Briggs (1993). 4
astro-ph/9609023	1	9609	1996-09-03T22:11:24	An Overview of Blazar Variability	[ "astro-ph" ]	Blazars are characterized by rapid variability at virtually all wavelengths from radio through TeV gamma-rays. The challenge since their discovery has been to understand the origin of their luminous, apparently nonthermal, nuclear emission. Considerable progress has been made in recent years thanks to a handful of multiwavelength monitoring campaigns with high enough temporal sampling to resolve the most rapid variations. The best data for a few objects have shown a variety of behaviors, for the most part commensurate with synchrotron and Compton-scattered emission from a relativistic jet, though better data for more blazars are still clearly needed. In particular, the origin of the seed photons that are upscattered to gamma-ray energies remains unclear. The latest multiwavelength light curves for the BL Lac object PKS2155-304 appear to rule out synchrotron emission from a homogeneous source.	astro-ph	astro-ph	An Overview of Blazar Variability C. Megan Urry Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218 Abstract. Blazars are characterized by rapid variability at virtually all wavelengths from radio through TeV gamma-rays. The challenge since their discovery has been to understand the origin of their luminous, ap- parently nonthermal, nuclear emission. Considerable progress has been made in recent years thanks to a handful of multiwavelength monitor- ing campaigns with high enough temporal sampling to resolve the most rapid variations. The best data for a few ob jects have shown a vari- ety of behaviors, for the most part commensurate with synchrotron and Compton-scattered emission from a relativistic jet, though better data for more blazars are still clearly needed. In particular, the origin of the seed photons that are upscattered to gamma-ray energies remains unclear. The latest multiwavelength light curves for the BL Lac ob ject PKS 2155–304 appear to rule out synchrotron emission from a homogeneous source. 1. Introduction Soon after blazars were discovered and identified, they were selected as inter- esting targets for long-term monitoring programs, by pioneers like Alex Smith among others, because of their extreme characteristics: they were the most vari- able, the most luminous, the most polarized, and in some sense the most exciting type of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). Understanding them at first seemed the key to understanding the AGN phenomenon. Ironically, blazars were eventually perceived as less interesting for the very same reason — because they were so unusual, so the reasoning went, they must not be relevant to the greater body of AGN (i.e., Seyfert galaxies and quasars). Blazar research was seen as a special field and blazars as arcane oddities. Now in the mid-90s, we have come full circle. Because blazars are rare ge- ometric manifestations of a general phenomenon (assuming they are relativistic jets pointing directly at us; Urry & Padovani 1995), they must be a quite com- mon kind of AGN, and when they are not pointing at us, we simply call them radio galaxies. This makes blazars highly relevant to understanding AGN as a whole. Specifically, the enormous energy of a relativistic jet, its emanation from the vicinity of the putative central black hole, and its high degree of collimation over many orders of magnitude in scale, offer direct clues to the extraction of energy from the black hole. Blazars thus reveal the energetic processes occurring in the very centers of active galaxies, while in the more common radio galaxies, jet radiation (and hence information) is beamed away from us. With blazars, 1 then, the goal is to understand black hole physics through understanding the physics of the jet. This in turn can be deduced from multiwavelength spectral characteristics, most notably correlated variability across the spectrum. 2. Blazars as Relativistic Jets Here I summarize the arguments for believing blazars are relativistic jets. First, they commonly exhibit superluminal motion (Vermeulen & Cohen 1994; see also Wehrle et al., these Proceedings) which, while it could arise from pattern rather than bulk relativistic velocity, is at least suggestive. Second, blazars can ex- hibit extremely high brightness temperatures; in at least some cases, intraday variations are observed at optical wavelengths, ruling out an extrinsic (scintilla- tion) explanation for the variability, although the implied bulk Lorentz factors are uncomfortably high (Wagner & Witzel 1995). Third, the characteristically high and variable polarization of blazars is explained naturally by an aligned jet (Smith et al., these Proceedings). Fourth, multiwavelength radio variability is well explained by shocks in a jet (Aller, these Proceedings). Fifth and most compelling, the strong and variable gamma-ray emission observed in many blazars (Hartman, these Proceedings) implies such a high compactness that the gamma-ray source would inevitably be dominated by pair production unless the emission is relativistically beamed (Dondi & Ghisellini 1995). While there is some uncertainty about the degree of beaming required (it depends on the ambient X-ray photon density, as X-gamma interactions are the most likely pair-production mechanism), the argument for some beaming is fairly tight. Blazars can be defined in various ways, via their rapid variability, their compact flat-spectrum radio emission, their superluminal motion, their polar- ization, and now their gamma-ray brightnesses, and in fact these characteristics occur in the same sources. That is, those sources that are superluminal have flat radio spectra and are highly polarized, and so on.1 An even more direct link has been seen in at least two cases. Ten years of VLBI maps of 3C 279 (Wehrle et al., these Proceedings) show a new VLBI component being “born” (extrapolating the observed position backward with the observed velocity) at the time of the bright gamma-ray flare in June 1991 (Wehrle et al. 1994). The same phenomenon has been observed in PKS 0528+134 (Pohl et al. 1995). In these two blazars, the production of (beamed) gamma-rays is directly related to superluminal motion of the radio source. That these various blazar character- istics are all closely linked, statistically and in some cases directly, is a strong argument that the underlying cause is relativistic beaming. 1An exception is that some highly polarized quasars (HPQ), largely radio-quiet, have continuum emission polarized by scattering rather than intrinsic processes like synchrotron radiation. These obviously do not have blazar characteristics like superluminal motion or rapid variability. 2 FSRQ, LBL HBL u f u g o L Radio IR Opt UV EUV X-Ray GRO 10 15 Log Frequency (Hz) 20 Figure 1. Schematic broad-band spectra of blazars from radio through TeV gamma rays. The low-energy component is probably due to synchrotron radiation and the high-energy component to Compton scattering of lower-energy seed photons, possibly the synchrotron pho- tons or ambient UV/X-ray disk or line photons. Two different curves represent the average spectral shapes (Sambruna et al. 1996) of HBL (High-frequency peaked BL Lac ob jects; dotted line) and LBL (Low- frequency peaked BL Lac ob jects; dashed line) as defined by their ratios of X-ray to radio flux (see footnote 2). Strong emission-line blazars (i.e., flat-spectrum radio quasars, or FSRQ) have continua like LBL (Sambruna et al. 1996). 3. Multiwavelength Spectra and Monitoring Observations in individual wavebands have established the viability of the rel- ativistic beaming hypothesis for blazars but have led to at best cursory under- standing of the physical state of the jet. For this, multiwavelength variability holds the key. Blazar spectra span an extremely broad range of energies, from radio through GeV gamma-rays and perhaps through TeV gamma-rays. The emission consists of two distinct spectral components, a low-energy synchrotron bump and a high-energy Compton-scattered bump (Figure 1). The temporal evolution of each spectral component and the correlation between them are critical to understanding the underlying emission mechanisms, which is why a number of large multiwavelength monitoring campaigns have been carried out in recent years. It should be noted that the difficulty of arranging these multiwavelength mo- nitoring observations, typically coordinated among several satellites and many more ground-based telescopes, has kept us from obtaining good data on more 3 than a few of the brightest blazars. More importantly, sensitivity limits have introduced significant target selection effects. Specifically, among BL Lac ob- jects, “High-frequency peaked BL Lacs” (HBL) and “Low-frequency peaked BL Lacs” (LBL) have distinctly different continuum shapes.2 These may indeed be opposite extremes of a continuous distribution because current BL Lac samples come from radio or X-ray surveys with fairly high flux limits and so are natu- rally dominated by LBL or HBL, respectively. The strong emission-line blazars (i.e., flat-radio-spectrum quasars, or FSRQ), also generally radio-selected, have continua like LBL (Sambruna et al. 1996). In any case, the spectral energy distributions of HBL and LBL/FSRQ differ in several ways (Fig. 1). The peak wavelength of the synchrotron component is in the infrared-optical band for LBL and FSRQ, whereas it peaks in the extreme ultraviolet to soft X-ray range for HBL. Also, LBL and FSRQ have a higher ratio of gamma-ray to synchrotron flux than the HBL (Sambruna et al. 1996), and most of the EGRET blazars are in fact FSRQ and LBL. Note that the synchrotron emission is most variable above the peak in ν Fν , where the shortest wavelength component becomes optically thin (Ulrich, Maraschi, & Urry 1996). Only two blazars, Mrk 421 and Mrk 501, both HBL, have been detected at TeV energies (Punch et al. 1992, Quinn et al. 1996). It may be that these particular ob jects were detected because they are relatively nearby (z ∼ 0.03 in both cases) so that the ultra-high-energy gamma-rays have little path length along which to produce pairs via scattering of intergalactic microwave photons, but it is probably also significant that the peak Compton emission in HBL is likely at much higher energies than in LBL/FSRQ. The luminosity represented by the extension of the blazar spectrum to GeV/TeV energies is phenomenal; clearly, understanding the production of this emission is central to understanding the blazar. Because of these systematic spectral differences, the observational details of the multiwavelength study dictate the type of blazar studied. To study blazars above the synchrotron peak, where they are most variable, means selecting UV- and X-ray-bright targets, which are inevitably HBL. To study correlated intra- day variability at radio and optical wavelengths means selecting LBL/FSRQ. To correlate with GeV gamma-rays, one looks primarily at LBL/FSRQ; to corre- late with TeV gamma-rays, one looks instead at HBL. With higher sensitivities, this artificial distinction will disappear, but it is important to remember that as presently observed, the radio-optical intraday variables are systematically different ob jects than the highly variable UV/X-ray-bright sources. With multiwavelength monitoring of blazars, there are two critical questions we are in the process of addressing. First, where do the gamma-rays come from, and second, what is the structure of the jet itself ? By figuring out what the particle density is, what the magnetic fields are, how each varies along the jet, and what causes flaring behavior, we can ultimately understand what created 2The two sub-classes of BL Lac ob ject are defined by their ratio of X-ray to radio flux, which anti- correlates with the wavelength of their peak synchrotron emission. A High-frequency peaked BL Lac (HBL) has αrx (between 5 GHz and 1 keV) less than 0.75, while a Low-frequency peaked BL Lac (LBL) has αrx > 0.75 (Padovani & Giommi 1995). 4 Figure 2. Multi-epoch broad-band spectra of 3C 279, in a high state in June 1991 and in a low state in January 1994 (Maraschi et al. 1994). While the UV decreased by a factor of 3-4, the gamma rays decreased by a factor of ∼ 10 or more. As is typical for blazars, there is little or no variability below the peak wavelength of the synchrotron component, the peak of which is in the unobserved far-infrared (now accessible with ISO). the jet, how it was formed, and what is happening down at the center where we cannot observe directly. For the rest of this paper, I discuss only two ob jects, 3C 279 and PKS 2155–304, which illustrate some of the best available data (see also Takahashi et al., these Proceedings) and thus the limits of what we can learn about blazars at this point. 4. Multi-Epoch Flaring in the Superluminal Quasar 3C 279 3C 279 is the brightest gamma-ray blazar in the sky. [During the week of the Miami blazar meeting, it was undergoing a ma jor outburst, rising an order of magnitude above its previous highest gamma-ray state, with substantial vari- ations at other wavelengths.] Figure 2 shows the broad-band spectra at two epochs, the high state in June 1991 when it was first discovered and a low state in January 1994; the greatest change in intensity occurs at gamma-ray wavelengths, with lesser but still substantial variations at UV and X-ray wave- lengths, and little change at radio to sub-millimeter wavelengths (Maraschi et al. 1994). Note that the gamma-ray flux can dominate the bolometric luminosity, particularly in the flare state. Maraschi et al. (1994) suggested that the larger 5 increase in gamma-rays relative to synchrotron emission was consistent with the synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model, although a change in Doppler factor of the jet or concurrent increases in seed photons and scattering electrons could also cause the observed variability. Clearly, sampling these flares more finely is critical to identifying the origin of the seed photons and thus the produc- tion of the dominant spectral component. The multiwavelength observations of the 1996 flare should help resolve the ambiguity about the identity of the seed photons (Wehrle et al., in preparation). The basic blazar models currently under consideration have one common element, a synchrotron-emitting jet filled with energetic electrons and perhaps positrons. In addition, there may be ambient UV and X-ray emission from the vicinity of an accretion disk, and broad-line emission from clouds farther out, photoionized either by the central UV/X-ray source or by the jet itself. The debate turns on which photons are Compton-scattered to gamma-ray energies. Photons impinging on the jet from the side are boosted in the frame of the jet electrons, and so constitute a very intense flux of seed photons even when the directly observed non-jet UV/X-ray flux is low. Ghisellini and Madau (1996) present a nice comparison of the principal ideas (see references therein as well) and conclude two interesting points. One is that the inner part of the jet has to be dissipationless. If the energy density of gamma-rays in an optically thick inner region of the jet were high, there would probably be enough local UV photons to generate a pair cascade, transferring much of the gamma-ray energy into X-rays, contrary to what is observed. So the principal mode by which energy is transferred from the black hole to the jet must not be via energetic photons. The second point is that, for plausible numbers, the illumination of the broad-line clouds by the beamed continuum can be an important contribution to the UV flux impinging on the jet. The bulk of the gamma-rays could therefore come from scattered broad-line photons which were photoionized by the jet itself. This might be the dominant mechanism in FSRQ, say, while SSC emission dominates in the weaker-lined HBL. It would be extremely interesting to monitor simultaneously the variability of the broad lines and the synchrotron continuum. As far as I am aware this has not yet been done, at least with sufficient sampling. We have looked at the archival UV data for 3C 279 (Koratkar et al. 1996) but even there, with a very well-observed source, the data are not sufficient to determine the photoionization source unambiguously. The 1996 campaign on 3C 279 will help and there are a number of other blazar campaigns planned for the upcoming year which may contribute to solving this problem. Unfortunately, the loss of IUE, with its long, sustained monitoring campaigns, is a ma jor blow for this kind of study. 5. Multiwavelength Variability of the HBL PKS 2155–304 PKS 2155–304 is the brightest BL Lac ob ject at ultraviolet wavelengths and one of the brightest in the X-ray as well. So it is the obvious choice for UV/X-ray monitoring. It is an HBL, with peak synchrotron emission near 1017 Hz, which is four orders of magnitude higher in frequency than the peak synchrotron emission in 3C 279. We have every reason to expect, therefore, that the physics of the emission from PKS 2155–304 and 3C 279 differ in significant ways. 6 Figure 3. Normalized X-ray, UV, and optical light curves of PKS 2155–304 from the first intensive multiwavelength monitoring cam- paign, in mid-November 1991 (Edelson et al. 1995). The emission is well-correlated, with comparable amplitude independent of wave- length, and the X-rays appear to lead the UV by ∼ 2-3 hours. Even with extensive coverage from the ground, the best optical data were obtained with the FES monitor on IUE, a simple star-tracking device, which highlights the value of adding modest optical devices to high- energy satellites. There have been two intensive multiwavelength campaigns to observe PKS 2155–304. [There was a third three months after the Miami blazar meeting.] The first was in November 1991 and lasted for one month. At that time, no one even knew whether the UV and X-ray emission were related, nor what the fastest time scale for variability was. We observed PKS 2155–304 with IUE once per day throughout November 1991 (thinking that was probably overkill) and then in the middle of the month, at the insistence of Rick Edelson (who rightly realized it was not overkill), we observed it for nearly 5 days continuously. The UV variations we detected were indeed fast enough that the daily sampling was insufficient and only the continuous observations were useful for multiwavelength cross-correlations (Urry et al. 1993). We also had ∼ 3.5 days of continuous X- ray observations (Brinkmann et al. 1995) overlapping with most of the intensive UV coverage, as well as considerable ground-based radio, infrared, and optical observations (Smith et al. 1992, Courvoisier et al. 1995). Results from the November 1991 campaign are shown in Figure 3. The X-ray, UV, and optical light curves are well-correlated, arguing for a common origin of the optical through X-ray emission, and the X-rays lead the UV by ∼ 2- 3 hours (Edelson et al. 1995). The optical/UV emission can not be produced by thermal emission from a viscous accretion disk because they should arise at 7 Figure 4. Normalized X-ray, EUV, and UV light curves of PKS 2155– 304 from the second intensive multiwavelength monitoring campaign, in May 1994 (Urry et al. 1996). The ASCA data show a strong flare, echoed one day later by EUVE and two days later by IUE. The ampli- tude of the flares decreases and the duration increases with increasing wavelength. very different radii, implying a large lag between the two. The amplitude of variation is independent of wavelength, a result contrary to what is expected from a synchrotron flare caused by an increase in energetic electrons (Celotti, Maraschi, & Treves 1991). Several aspects of the 1991 results were intriguing enough to inspire us to repeat the experiment for a longer period and with more extensive wavelength coverage. First, the light curves consisted of a series of peaks modulated by an overall decline in flux; while not strictly periodic (Edelson et al. 1995), they suggested possible repetition through five cycles. Second, the UV and X-ray light curves, which tracked very well for most of the observation, appeared to diverge at the very end of the overlapping period. We therefore arranged a second intensive monitoring campaign in May 1994, with IUE for 10 days continuously (Pian et al. 1996), EUVE for 9 days (Marshall et al., in prep.), and ASCA for 2 days (Kii et al., in prep.), and with additional Rosat (Urry et al. 1996) and ground-based data (Pesce et al. 1996). Fig- ure 4 shows the results from this second set of multiwavelength observations of PKS 2155–304 (Urry et al. 1996). A very sharp flare is seen in X-rays, followed by an EUV flare one day later and a broader, lower amplitude UV flare two days later. The X-ray flux doubles in ∼ 0.2 days and is approximately symmetric. The Rosat data, while sparse, show that large X-ray flares were not unusual but were occurring throughout the week prior to the ASCA observations. The EUV flux increased by ∼ 50% in less than a day (the time scale is difficult to estimate 8 Figure 5. Cross correlation of May 1994 ASCA and IUE light curves of PKS 2155–304, showing that the X-ray flux leads the UV by ∼ 2 days (Urry et al. 1996). given the errors and the untimely end of the data train), and the UV flux rose by ∼ 35% with a doubling time scale of ∼ 3 days. The duration of the flare increases from less than a day in the X-rays to nearly 4 days in the UV. The delays between X-ray, EUV, and UV light curves are easily measured with cross-correlation functions. Formally, the EUV flux leads the UV by 1.1 days and the X-ray flux leads the UV by 2.0 days. The cross-correlation between IUE and ASCA light curves is shown in Figure 5; the cross-correlation of X-ray versus EUV light curves is not well defined due to the small temporal overlap. (Fig. 5). The IUE data also reveal a complex and extremely rapid flare at the be- ginning of the observation, with doubling times as fast as 1 hour, the fastest ever observed at ultraviolet wavelengths and comparable to the fastest doubling times seen in the X-ray (Pian et al. 1996). The event is seen in both LWP and SWP cameras, and is undersampled by both; it has larger amplitude in the LWP in part because the LWP integration times are less than half the SWP integration times. It is also possible to see similar structure in the EUV light curves, although the EUVE data are relatively noisy, ∼ 1-2 days in advance of the IUE event. Figure 6 shows an expanded view of the EUVE and IUE light curves, with the EUVE curve shifted forward by 1.25 days. There are strong differences between the May 1994 and November 1991 light curves of PKS 2155–304. In the second epoch, the amplitude and duration depend strongly on wavelength and the lags are considerably longer than in the first. In addition, there is little of the low-amplitude repetitive variability, at least in the first half of the IUE observation. These differences mean either that there are two different mechanisms operating or that the relevant physical 9 Figure 6. Expanded view of the beginning of the IUE light curve of PKS 2155–304 from May 1994, with the EUVE light curve shifted forward by 1.25 days. The extremely rapid UV variability on May 16, undersampled in both LWP and SWP cameras, is similar to earlier, lower amplitude variations in the EUVE light curve. parameters have changed considerably. The variability in 1991 was probably not a synchrotron flare, since the observed time scales were energy independent. Instead, it is possible that it was caused by microlensing: for a dense star cluster at the redshift of a known Lyman-alpha absorption system (about half way to the BL Lac), and assuming relativistic motion of the BL Lac jet, the amplitudes and time scales are approximately correct, and the achromatic nature is automatic as long as the source size is independent of wavelength. This is a plausible but not proven explanation. The 1994 data are much richer in extent and wavelength coverage. These data are consistent with a synchrotron flare in a jet but the clear delay between X-ray and UV flares rules out the homogeneous case (Urry et al. 1996). The reasoning is as follows. The simplest causes of a flare in the homogeneous case would be a sudden uniform increase in the injection of energetic electrons or the instantaneous and uniform enhancement of the magnetic field, perhaps via compression of a charged plasma. In both cases, the flux at all (optically thin) wavelengths would rise simultaneously, with amplitude increasing with decreas- ing wavelength, while the duration of the flare (if due to energy losses only) would go as λ1/2 . That is, the long-wavelength emission would last longer than the short-wavelength emission but the (instantaneous) peaks in the light curves would be simultaneous. The delay in the flare onset and the longer rise time for the UV flare compared to the X-ray flare clearly rule out the simplest homoge- neous case, unless ad hoc dependences on time and energy of the injection rate are postulated. 10 Thus, some energy stratification of the synchrotron-emitting plasma is re- quired, either behind a shock or in the jet structure itself. The X-ray decay is faster than the UV but perhaps by less than a factor (λU V /λX )1/2 ∼ 20, suggesting the decay is dominated by geometry rather than synchrotron losses. The flare duration increases with wavelength, possibly indicating that the size of the emitting region is increasing with wavelength. The observed lags are also comparable to the flare durations. Both these results are as expected for a shock propogating outward in an inhomogeneous jet, successively passing from X-ray- to EUV- to UV-emitting regions. 6. Future Multiwavelength Monitoring As this review has shown, the best available data are still insufficient for deter- mining jet structure but enough to indicate the kind of data needed. We should repeat the kind of multiwavelength monitoring done for PKS 2155–304 for many more blazars, including LBL, which will require a new ultraviolet capability. We also need to study further the correlation of gamma-ray and optical/IR variabil- ity. In all cases, long and intensive time sampling is critical: two light curves that are well correlated could, if sampled at few points or for less time than the char- acteristic lag, appear uncorrelated. Thus the single epoch approach is no longer valuable for adding information. The requirement for intensive monitoring and for larger samples of ob jects points to the need for a multiwavelength platform with modest, very simple, very inexpensive optical/UV telescopes paired with X-ray and gamma-ray detectors. I am grateful to my many collaborators for their con- Acknowledgments. tributions to our multiwavelength monitoring of blazars, particularly those with whom I have worked most closely in recent years, Laura Maraschi, Joe Pesce, Elena Pian, Rita Sambruna, Aldo Treves, and Ann Wehrle, and those who were PIs for the second campaign on PKS 2155–304, Tsuneo Kii, Herman Marshall, and Greg Madejski. Discussion Al Marscher : In the 1994 PKS 2155–304 flare, you say that the fast rise is from the time scale for particle acceleration but that the slower decay is geometric. Light travel effects should limit the shorter time scale, not the longer. Also I dis- agree that the longer time scales and lags at lower frequencies require gradients in the underlying jet to be the root cause: shocks should be frequency-stratified and give the behavior you observe (Marscher, Gear & Travis 1992, in Variability of Blazars). Meg Urry : You are right about the geometric limit for the fastest time scale. We agree that the jet needs to be inhomogeneous. Whether the inhomogeneity arises from the natural stratification due to energy-dependent losses and diffusion from a shock, or from some other means, is not known at this point. 11 Hugh Al ler : I am worried about involving different physical processes to explain two different flare events (1991 versus 1994) in PKS 2155–304. Isn’t a single process which permits both events to be explained ultimately simpler? Meg Urry : I can see how it would seem that way but frankly, the character of the variations in 1991 and in 1994 is so different that the required change in parameters of the single process you might prefer is more or less equivalent to a distinct process. If, for example, we decide that the 1994 flares are the signature of a shock propagating through an inhomogeneous jet, with the expected depen- dence of amplitude on wavelength and delays of ∼ 1 day from X-rays to EUV to UV-emitting regions, then how can this model explain the 1991 variability, with its achromaticity and negligible lags? In a sense these are opposite behaviors, which naturally suggest unrelated causes. References Brinkmann, W., et al. 1994, A&A, 288, 433 Celotti, A., Maraschi, L., & Treves, A. 1991, ApJ, 377, 403 Courvoisier, T. J.-L., et al. 1995, ApJ, 438, 108 Dondi, L., & Ghisellini, G. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 583 Edelson, R. A., et al. 1995, ApJ, 438, 120 Ghisellini, G., & Madau, P. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 67 Koratkar, A., Pesce, J. E., Urry, C. M., & Pian, E. 1996, in preparation Maraschi, L., et al. 1994, ApJ, 435, L91 Padovani, P., & Giommi, P. 1995, ApJ, 444, 567 Pesce, J. E., et al. 1996, ApJ, submitted Pian, E., et al. 1996, ApJ, submitted Pohl, M. et al. 1995, A&A, 303, 383 Punch M., Akerlof C. W., Cawley M. F., Chantell M. ., Fegan D. J., Fennell S., Gaidos J. A., Hagan J., Hillas A. M., & Jiang Y. 1992, Nature, 358, 477 Quinn J., et al. 1996, ApJ, 456, L83 Sambruna R., Maraschi L., & Urry C. M. 1996, ApJ, 463, 444 Smith, P. S., Hall, P. B., Allen, R. G., & Sitko, M. L. 1992, ApJ, 400, 115 Ulrich, M.-H., Maraschi, L., & Urry, C. M. 1996, ARAA, in preparation Urry, C. M., et al. 1993, ApJ, 411, 614 Urry, C. M., et al. 1996, ApJ, submitted Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803 Vermeulen R., & Cohen M. 1994, ApJ, 430, 467 Wagner S., & Witzel A. 1995, ARA&A, in press Wehrle, A. E., Zook, A. C., Unwin, S. C., Urry, C. M., & Madejski, G. 1994, in The Multi-Mission Perspective (High Energy Astrophysics Division Meeting of the American Astronomical Society, Napa Valley, November 1994), p. 27 12
astro-ph/9712216	1	9712	1997-12-17T17:03:13	Optical-IR Spectral Energy Distributions of z>2 Lyman Break Galaxies	[ "astro-ph" ]	Broadband optical and IR spectral energy distributions are determined for spectroscopically confirmed z>2 Lyman break objects in the Hubble Deep Field (HDF). These photometric data are compared to spectral synthesis models which take into account the effects of metallicity and of internal reddening due to dust. It is found that, on average, Lyman break objects are shrouded in enough dust (typically E(B-V)~0.3) to suppress their UV fluxes by a factor of more than 10. The dust-corrected star formation rate in a typical HDF Lyman break object is ~60 h^-2 M_sun/yr (q_0=0.5). Furthermore, these objects are dominated by very young (<~0.2 Gyr, and a median of ~25 Myr) stellar populations, suggesting that star formation at high redshift is episodic rather than continuous. Typically, these star formation episodes produce ~10^9 h^-2 M_sun of stars, or ~1/20 of the stellar mass of a present-day L* galaxy.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomical Journal, in press Optical-IR Spectral Energy Distributions of z > 2 Lyman Break Galaxies 1 2 Marcin Sawicki and H. K. C. Yee Department of Astronomy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H8, Canada email: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Broadband optical and IR spectral energy distributions are determined for spectro- scopically confirmed z > 2 Lyman break objects in the Hubble Deep Field (HDF). These photometric data are compared to spectral synthesis models which take into account the effects of metallicity and of internal reddening due to dust. It is found that, on av- erage, Lyman break objects are shrouded in enough dust (typically E(B − V ) ≈ 0.3) to suppress their UV fluxes by a factor of more than 10. The dust-corrected star formation rate in a typical HDF Lyman break object is ∼ 60h−2 100M⊙yr−1 (q0 = 0.5). Furthermore, these objects are dominated by very young (∼< 0.2 Gyr, and a median of ∼ 25 Myr) stel- lar populations, suggesting that star formation at high redshift is episodic rather than continuous. Typically, these star formation episodes produce ∼ 109h−2 100M⊙ of stars, or ∼ 1 20 of the stellar mass of a present-day L∗ galaxy. 1. INTRODUCTION Recent observational studies of the high-redshift Universe have begun to yield direct informa- tion on the nature of the population of "normal" galaxies at z > 2. Color-selected searches have started to produce growing, spectroscopically-confirmed samples (e.g., Steidel et al. 1996a; Steidel et al. 1996b; Pascarelle et al. 1996; Lowenthal et al. 1997; Steidel et al. 1997), while larger samples of objects identified solely on the basis of multicolor photometry have been used to boost statistics (e.g., Madau et al. 1996; Sawicki, Lin & Yee 1997; Connolly et al. 1997). Whether spectroscop- ically confirmed or not, such high-z objects are often called "Lyman-break galaxies" or "U-band drop-outs". The names reflect the fact that in these galaxies the UV flux is severly attenuated 1Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. 2Based on observations made at the Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. -- 2 -- by the combined effects of internal and intergalactic Lyman line and continuum opacity. Unlike serendipitously discovered single objects, these new samples of high-z galaxies are large enough to allow the study of global properties of the z > 2 galaxy population, such as their number density, luminosity density, luminosity function, and rates of star formation and metal ejection. Despite this recent progress, there is much that still remains unclear. Based on number densi- ties, star formation rates, physical sizes, morphologies and masses inferred from spectral line widths, Steidal et al. (1996a) and Giavalisco, Steidel, & Macchetto (1996) argue that Lyman break objects are the spheroidal components of present-day luminous galaxies, seen in the act of formation. Using diagnostics similar to those employed by Steidel et al. and Giavalisco et al., Lowental et al. (1997) favor the interpretation that Lyman break objects are either progenitors of present-day low-mass spheroidal galaxies or are starbursting building blocks of more massive galaxies of today (see also Colley et al. 1997). Estimates of star formation rates in Lyman break galaxies are based on their rest-frame UV fluxes (e.g., Steidel et al. 1996a; Madau et al. 1996; Lowenthal et al. 1997). However, even moderate amounts of dust may significantly suppress the UV flux and, hence, the inferred star formation rate. Meurer et al. (1997) have studied the UV spectral indices of HDF Lyman break galaxies and have deduced that, if ages of their stellar populations are ∼< 0.3 Gyr, reddening due to dust supresses the UV flux fairly strongly (on average, a factor of 15 at 1600 A). Using the same spectral indices, but assuming older ages (1 Gyr), Calzetti (1997) found the attenuation a factor of 3 lower than that arrived at by Meurer et al. (1997). These two different results, obtained from the same data, reflect the fact that both dust and aging have similar effects on the UV shape of the SED and that one can mimick the effects of the other. This dust-age degeneracy can be lifted by the addition of IR (i.e., rest-optical) data, which are sensitive to age but much less so to dust. Ages of star-forming objects at z > 2 are not well known. Steidel et al. (1996a) feel that ages younger than a few ×107yr are unlikely, arguing that such young ages would imply that a large number of galaxies have to be bursting simultaneously. However, apart from the gravitationally lensed z = 2.72 OB star absorption-line galaxy cB58 (Yee et al. 1996), for which fits to broadband optical and IR colors give the age of the dominant stellar population to be ∼< 35 Myr (Ellingson et al. 1996), no quantitative age measurements exist for Lyman break galaxies. Constraints on ages will lift the dust-age degeneracy, in addition to providing clues to the evolutionary history of Lyman break objects. The Hubble Deep Field (HDF;Williams et al. 1996) is a small but intensly studied area of the sky, for which both extremely deep multiwavelength imaging (e.g., Williams et al. 1996; Dickinson et al. 1997; Hogg et al. 1997; Serjeant et al. 1997; Fomalont et al. 1997) and follow-up spectroscopy (e.g., Steidel et al. 1996b; Cohen et al. 1996; Lowenthal et al. 1997; Zepf et al. 1997) have been carried out. To date, 17 spectroscopically confirmed z > 2 Lyman break galaxies have been reported in the HDF (Steidel et al. 1996a; Lowenthal et al. 1997). In this paper we construct the broadband optical and IR (i.e., rest-frame UV and optical) spec- -- 3 -- tral energy distributions (SEDs) of the 17 spectroscopically confirmed Hubble Deep Field Lyman break galaxies (§ 2). These observed SEDs are then fitted with dust-corrected spectral synthesis models described in § 3.1. These fits show that light from Lyman break galaxies is attenuated by significant amounts of dust (typically E(B − V ) ≈ 0.3; § 3.2) and is dominated by very young (∼< 0.2Gyr) stellar populations (§ 3.3). Furthermore, Lyman break objects have high rates of star formation (typically ∼ 60h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.5; § 3.4), and quite low stellar masses (typically, ∼ 109h−2 100M⊙; § 3.5). Since internal reddening in Lyman break galaxies appears to be significant, in § 4.1 we calculate its effects on the recently-published estimates of z > 2 star formation and metal ejection rates. In § 4.2 we speculate on the nature of Lyman break galaxies in view of the high star formation rates and young ages of stellar populations which we found earlier. Our results are summarized in § 5. 2. DATA We study the broadband spectral energy distributions for the 17 spectroscopically confirmed z > 2 HDF objects reported by Steidel et al. (1996b; 6 objects3, some with revised redshifts4) and by Lowenthal et al. (1997; 11 objects). We measured broadband fluxes using both optical (Williams et al. 1996) and infrared (Dickinson et al. 1997) data. Specifically, in the optical we used the publicly-available Version 2, 4 × 4 binned, HST images of the HDF; in the IR we employed the, also publicly available, Version 1 Kitt Peak 4m IRIM observations. The use of the IR data is crucial, as at z ∼ 3 the optical data alone give coverage only bluewards of rest-2000 A, while the IR extends this to rest-5500 A, thereby spanning the age-sensitive Balmer break. Altogether, the available photometry spans 3000 -- 22000 A (or 750 -- 5500 A at z = 3) in 7 bandpasses (U300, B450, V606, I814, J, H, Ks)5, although, as will be explained later, we do not include the U300 and B450 data in our fits. We smoothed the HST images to match the poorer, ground-based point spread function (PSF) of the IR images. We then performed photometry using the PPP faint galaxy photometry package 3Steidel et al. report five z > 2 redshifts. Since, morphologically, C4-06 appears to have two distinct components, we have treated it as two objects at a common redshift. 4 The redshift of the Steidel et al. (1996b) object C5-02 has been revised from z = 2.845 to z = 2.008 (Steidel, private communication). The reported redshift of C3-02 may also be erroneous: The observed broadband SED of C3-02 (Figure 1) exhibits a break between the I814 and J filters and not, as would have been expected of the Balmer break in a z = 2.775 object, redward of J. We note that the absorption lines of C IV 1550, Fe II 1608, and Al II 1670 could be misidentified as Ly α 1216, Si II 1260, and O I 1303. In this case the redshift of C3-02 would be z = 1.95, which is consistent with the photometric redshift zphot = 2.1 of Sawicki et al. (1997) and with the placement of the Balmer break between the I814 and J filters. While adopting the revised redshift for C5-02, we retain the published value for C3-02. We tested the effects of this possible redshift misidentification on our analysis and found them to be small. 5U300, B450, V606, and I814 are used to denote the HST filters F 300W , F 450W , F 606W , and F 814W . -- 4 -- (Yee 1991). Colors were measured in "color apertures": for each object, a color aperture was chosen so as to maximize the S/N. Photometric calibration was based on the zeropoints provided in the STScI-HDF and KPNO-IRIM-HDF web pages (Ferguson 1996; Dickinson 1996), while conversion to AB magnitudes (for the IR data) was done using the Fν (0 mag) fluxes of Wemstaker (1981). The photometry results are presented in Table 1. The magnitudes listed are "total magnitudes" obtained by correcting the object's magnitude within the color aperture by its growth curve in the V606 image. A typical total magnitude aperture is 3.2′′. 3. COMPARISON WITH SPECTRAL SYNTHESIS MODELS 3.1. The Models For the analysis of the stellar populations of Lyman break galaxies, we generated a set of model broadband SEDs constructed in the following way: We started with the Bruzual & Charlot (1996) multi-metallicity spectral synthesis models; specifically, we used the KL96 theoretical stellar spectra6 with the Salpeter 0.1 < m < 125 IMF. These Bruzual & Charlot models were attenuated M⊙ with Calzetti's (1997; see also Calzetti et al. 1994) empirical reddening recipe for star-forming galaxies7 , covering a range of E(B − V ) values. The reddened SEDs were appropriately redshifted and then convolved with the instrumental transmission curves (in the case of the HST data) or filter transmission curves (for the Kitt Peak IR observations) producing a suite of model colors. For each object this suite of model colors contains two possible star formation histories (instantaneous burst and constant star formation), 221 ages (0 -- 20 Gyr), three different metallicities (0.02Z⊙, 0.2Z⊙, and 1.0Z⊙), and a range of reddening (E(B − V ) = 0.0 to 0.5 in steps of 0.02). Why were these particular ingredients chosen for the models? Initial mass function: The initial mass function, at least in low-redshift starbursts, appears to be independent of environment and is consistent with the Salpeter IMF with a high (∼ 100M⊙) upper mass cutoff (Stasi´nska & Leitherer 1996; see also Massey et al. 1995). We have thus chosen to use the Salpeter 0.1 < m < 125 IMF M⊙ available in the Bruzual & Charlot (1996) library. Reddening curve: Since, by virtue of their color selection criteria (Steidel et al. 1996b; Lowenthal et al. 1997), the 17 spectroscopically confirmed HDF Lyman break objects are star-forming, the use of the Calzetti (1997) reddening curve for 6In general, substantial differences still exist between composite SEDs based on theoretical and empirical stellar spectra. We have, however, tested our dust and age results with Bruzual & Charlot solar-metallicity empirical models and found that the differences were small for our purposes. 7Calzetti (1997) gives: Fobs(λ) = F0(λ)10−0.4E(B−V )k(λ), where k(λ) = (cid:26) [(1.86 − 0.48/λ)/λ − 0.1]/λ + 1.73 2.656(−2.156 + 1.509/λ − 0.198/λ2 + 0.011/λ3) + 4.88 for 0.63µm ≤ λ ≤ 1.0µm for 0.12µm ≤ λ < 0.63µm -- 5 -- star-forming regions is appropriate. Unlike the commonly-used LMC and SMC reddening curves (Fitzpatrick 1986; Bouchet et al. 1985) which are are derived for stars alone, the Calzetti curve holds for star-forming regions; it thus automatically includes such effects as back-scattering and geometrical distribution of dust and is therefore much more appropriate for correcting the effects of dust on the photometry of star-forming galaxies (Gordon, Calzetti, & Witt 1997). Using the LMC reddening law would produce extinction values 2.5 -- 3 times lower than that which we find (§ 4.1) with the more appropriate Calzetti extinction curve. Metallicity: Damped Ly-α systems at z = 2− 3 have metallicities Z ∼< 0.1Z⊙ (Pettini et al. 1994; Lu et al. 1996; Pettini et al. 1997a); thus 0.2Z⊙ or 0.02Z⊙ are reasonable values to expect for the metallicity of Lyman break galaxies, while 1.0Z⊙ provides a useful check in case the metallicity of Lyman break objects were significantly higher than that of damped Ly-α clouds. Ages: At z ≈ 3 the Universe is only 1 -- 2 Gyr old and no object within it can be older than that; we have, however, allowed for model ages of up to 20 Gyr as a consistency check of the fits. Star formation history: In reality, the most likely star-formation scenario is that of a burst in which the star formation rate (SFR) declines with time. The two star formation histories used (instantaneous burst and constant SFR) thus provide the bracketing cases of the likely star formation histories of these objects. Dust contents and ages of stellar populations obtained from these two extremes will then bracket the actual values of age and reddening. For high-redshift objects, the neutral hydrogen contained in Ly-α clouds along the line of sight provides an extra source of opacity in the UV (e.g., Madau 1995). The amount of extinction provided by this mechanism is stochastic and depends on the numbers, redshift distribution, and column densities of the Ly-α clouds along the line of sight to the target galaxy. The galaxy's UV flux is affected blueward of rest-1216 A and is almost completely extinguished below rest- 912 A. Whereas this effect is of great usefulness in identifying high-z galaxies, its stochastic nature introduces uncertainties below ∼ 1200 A in the SED models for individual galaxies. These stochastic uncertainties, combined with the fact that the dust reddening curve is not well known below 1200 A, led us to decide not to fit the two bluest filters (U300 and B450). Thus all the fits presented in this paper have been done using the 5 reddest filters (V606, I814, J, H, and Ks). Metallicity (Z = 0.02Z⊙, 0.2Z⊙, and 1.0Z⊙) and star formation history (instantaneous burst and constant SFR) were fixed, giving six scenarios. In each of these six scenarios, age since the onset of star formation and amount of dust were free parameters. The models and the data were compared by means of χ2 minimization. As an illustration, Figure 1 shows the fits thus obtained with the 0.2Z⊙ continuous-SFR models. Instantaneous burst models, as well as those for Z = 0.02Z⊙ and 1.0Z⊙, produced fits of similar quality. Note that the two bluest filters, although not used to produce the fit, match the best-fitting model SEDs quite well. Because reddening increases towards shorter wavelengths, the part of the SED which contains information about dust attenuation is the rest-frame UV. Dust attenuation can, however, be mim- icked by aging of the stellar population: as the population ages, massive stars die out and the UV flux decreases. For example, below rest-3000A a zero-age SED with E(B − V ) = 0.3 looks very much like a 100 Myr, constant SFR, dust-free one. The availability of IR data allows the lifting -- 6 -- of this degeneracy between age and reddening: at z > 2, IR data are probing the rest-optical part of the SED and consequently measure the age by means of the size of the Balmer break and, to a lesser degree, the slope of the continuum redward of rest-4000A. Metallicity effects could pose a problem because of the age-metallicity degeneracy (e.g., Worthey 1994), but we have monitored their effects by performing fits with models of different metallicity (0.02Z⊙, 0.2Z⊙, and 1.0Z⊙). As will be seen later, no overwhelming metallicity effects have been found. With increasing redshift, the rest wavelengths probed by each filter move more and more blueward (by z ≈ 3, the H filter is centered at 4000A) and consequently less and less information is available about the age-sensitive rest-optical part of the SED. Thus, past z = 3, only one filter (Ks) is redward of the 4000A break. Because of this loss of age-sensitive information at higher redshifts, we have chosen to split the sample at z = 3. We consider fits for the 11 objects at z < 3 to be much more reliable than those for the six at z > 3. The results and discussion presented below are mainly based on the 11 z < 3 galaxies; we will, however, retain the six z > 3 objects for completeness and as a consistency check. 3.2. Dust Content For each object the models described above fit simultaneously the dust content and the age of the dominant stellar population. The age and E(B − V ) parameters of the best-fitting 0.2Z⊙ models are plotted in Figure 2, with error bars corresponding to 90% confidence limits. The Figure illustrates that the Lyman break objects are best fitted by models which require non-zero amounts of dust. The median values for both the instantaneous burst and constant SFR 0.2Z⊙ scenarios are E(B − V ) = 0.28, producing a factor of 16 attenuation at 1600A. This attenuation value is in agreement with the result derived from the UV spectral indices by Meurer et al. (1997) (see also Calzetti 1997). Note, however, that Meurer et al. had to assume (correctly, as we shall see in § 3.3) that the z > 2 galaxies are no older than 0.3 Gyr. Just as in the 0.2Z⊙ case, the 0.02Z⊙ and 1.0Z⊙ models reqiure significant amounts of dust. The results are summarized in Figure 3 which shows the distribution of E(B − V ) values for the six different scenarios. Dust is required for the vast majority of galaxies in all of the six scenarios. For sub-solar metallicities (0.02Z⊙ and 0.2Z⊙) typical values are E(B − V ) ≈ 0.3 and somewhat lower (E(B − V ) = 0.15 − 0.2) for the unlikely case of solar metallicity. Can dust-free models be securely ruled out? The error bars in Figure 2 are 90% confidence limits; hence, at 90% confidence, non-zero amounts of dust are unavoidable in all but one or two of the 11 z < 3 objects. The presence of dust is further illustrated in Figure 4, where, for three objects, the best possible dust-free models are compared with those in which dust is allowed. More qualitatively, the median reduced χ2 are 1.34 and 1.68 for the instantaneous burst ad constant SFR 0.2Z⊙ fits with dust; the corresponding dust-free values are 5.04 and 10.1. Models with dust give much better fits than those without it. Therefore we conclude that dust is present in Lyman break -- 7 -- galaxies. A similar conclusion was reached by Ellingson et al. (1996) for the z = 2.72 galaxy cB58, which has relatively high-precision IR photometry. The high reddening values obtainded here from broadband photometry of Lyman break galaxies are in contrast to the negligible extinctions inferred from chemical abundances in damped Lyα systems (Lu et al. 1996; Pettini et al. 1997a). However, while quasar sightlines probe essentially random regions of damped Lyα galaxies, broadband photometry targets regions of star formation. Thus, if the star-forming regions have substantially different dust-to-gas ratios than "random" parts of high-redshift galaxies, then the discrepancy between the damped Lyα spectroscopic and our photometric results may simply reflect the differences in the environments that the two methods probe. Star formation rates have been derived from the fluxes of either Hα or Hβ for the small number of high-redshift objects for which these fluxes have been measured (Bechtold et al. 1997; Pettini et al. 1997b). In these objects, line-based SFR measurements are generally lower than the dust- corrected star-formation rates derived from UV fluxes. This apparent discrepancy can, however, be caused by a number of effects other than discrepant dust measurements; these effects include leakeage of Lyman-limit photons from H II regions, absorption of Lyman-limit photons by dust, and a non-standard IMF (see Bechtold et al. 1997 and references therein). These effects may affect the reliability of SFR measurements based on emission lines. Ultimately, concurrent measurements of Hα/Hβ ratios will provide a robust and independent estimate of the dust content in Lyman break galaxies. Based on our analysis, the presence of dust in Lyman break galaxies seems unavoidable with E(B − V ) ≈ 0.3 being typical. As will be discussed in § 4.1, these amounts of dust are large enough to significantly affect estimates of star formation and metal ejection rates at high redshift. 3.3. Ages of Stellar Populations For each galaxy, we shall date the age of the galaxy's dominant stellar population. It must be emphashized that the age of the dominant stellar population does not mean the age of the galaxy itself, but rather corresponds to the time since the onset of the most recent major episode of star formation. Note that the instantaneous burst and constant SFR models are the limiting- case scenarios, while a galaxy's star formation history probably lies somewhere between these two extremes. Thus, the instantaneous burst model provides the lower bound, while the constant SFR model gives the upper bound on the likely age of the galaxy's current episode of star formation. Figure 2 presents the parameters of the best-fitting 0.2Z⊙ models, while Figure 5 shows the distribution of galaxy ages for all six combinations of metallicity and star formation history. As these Figures illustrate, in the constant SFR scenario the vast majority of z < 3 objects, for which spectral coverage is sufficient in the red, are best fit with models for which the ages of dominant stellar populations are less than 0.2 Gyr. In the instantaneous burst scenario, the ages -- 8 -- of virtually all the objects, including the six with z > 3, are less than 0.1 Gyr. The median ages for the z < 3 objects are 36 Myr and 10 Myr in the 0.2Z⊙ constant SFR and instantaneous burst scenarios, respectively. Although objects at z > 3 have insufficient IR coverage to constrain ages reliably, their fits are also consistent with very young stellar populations; for the instantaneous burst scenarios these ages are as young as for the z < 3 objects. How confidently can we rule out older ages of stellar populations? The error bars in Figure 2 are 90% confidence limits. If we consider the constant SFR model (which is more favorable for long ages), we see that of the z < 3 objects all but one must have ages < 1 Gyr at the 90% confidence level. A further illustration of the necessity of young ages is given in Figure 6: the (forced) 1 Gyr- old models produce poorer fits than the unforced younger models. More qualitatively, whereas the median reduced χ2 are 1.34 and 1.68 for the 0.2Z⊙ instantaneous burst and constant SFR models with free age, the corresponding values for the forced 1Gyr fits are 355.2 and 6.67, respectively. We therefore conclude that the z > 2 Lyman break galaxies are dominated by very young stellar populations. < 125 IMF) may not reflect the true IMF in the Lyman break galaxies. A possible concern is that the IMF employed to generate the models (i.e., the Salpeter 0.1 < m In particu- M⊙ lar, the determination of the age of the stellar population is primarily sensitive to the size of the Balmer break, which grows as the population ages. Since low-mass stars are responsible for the Balmer break, an IMF deficient in low-mass stars would produce a Balmer break that is smaller than expected for a given age, thereby mimicking the signature of a younger stellar population. Consequently, for an IMF deficient in low-mass star, our fits would underestimate the ages of stellar populations. The multi-metallicity SEDs of Bruzual & Charlot (1996) are available only for the 0.1 < m < 125 IMF. Hence, to estimate the impact of an IMF with a high lower-mass cutoff, we M⊙ have compared the predicted colors of Bruzual & Charlot (1993) solar metallicity models with dif- ferent IMF mass ranges. Specifically, we have compared the 0.1 < m < 125 M⊙ Salpeter IMFs. The comparison reveals that, for the young ages in question and if the IMF is deficient in low-mass stars, the age of the star-forming population can be underestimated by a factor of ∼ 5 in the instantaneous burst scenarios; in the constant SFR models the underestimate is only at the 10% level. These effects would then increase the median age in either scenario to no more than ∼ 50 Myr. IMF effects are thus unlikely to affect our conclusion that the Lyman break objects have very young stellar populations. < 125 and 2.5 < m M⊙ Figure 7 shows, as a function of redshift, ages of stellar populations obtained with the 0.2Z⊙ SEDs. The age of the q0 = 0.5, t0 = 12.5 Gyr Universe and the age of an object which formed at zf = 4.5 are shown for comparison. Lyman break galaxies are, by and large, dominated by very young stellar populations. The absence of older (age > 0.2 Gyr) objects, particularly at the lower end of the redshift range covered, is remarkable. Possible reasons for this absence will be discussed in § 4.2. -- 9 -- 3.4. Star Formation Rates To estimate the star formation rates in Lyman break galaxies, we use the constant SFR fits. For each of the observed objects, we obtain the SFR by comparing the normalization of the fit to that of a 1M⊙yr−1 model of identical age and reddening. For the z < 3 objects, 0.2Z⊙ constant SFR models, and q0 = 0.5, the median SFR is 59h−2 100M⊙yr−1 (167h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.05). The distribution of star formation rates in our sample is shown in Figure 8. As a check on the star formation rates derived above from SED fitting, we can use the predicted rest-frame 1500 A flux of a 9 Myr old, 106M⊙ galaxy with a 100 < m < 1 Salpeter IMF (Leither et M⊙ al. 1995). Comparing the dust-corrected, observed fluxes of the HDF Lyman break objects against the fiducial flux of Leitherer et al. gives a median SFR of 63h−2 100M⊙yr−1 (q0 = 0.5), thereby confirming the SFR value obtained earlier from SED fitting. For illustrative purposes, we have also computed the SFRs under the assumption that the Lyman break objects are dust-free. The resulting median star formation rate is 2h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.5 (6h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.05), in agreement with the dust-free SFR estimates given by Steidel et al. (1996a) and Lowenthal et al. (1996). However, since models which include dust produce much better fits, we prefer the ∼ 60h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.05) dust-corrected rates of star formation. 100M⊙yr−1 (∼ 170h−2 3.5. Stellar Masses To estimate the stellar masses produced in Lyman break galaxies, we can use the results of either the instantaneous burst fits or the constant SFR fits. For the instantaneous burst fits, we compute the stellar mass formed in each of the observed objects by comparing the normalization of the fit to that of a 1M⊙ model of identical age and reddening. For the z < 3 objects, 0.2Z⊙ instantaneous burst models, and q0 = 0.5(0.05), the median mass in stars is 1(2) × 109h−2 100M⊙, or about 1 15 ) the stellar mass of a present-day L∗ galaxy (3 × 1010h−1 30 ( 1 100M⊙; Cowie et al. 1995). Under the constant SFR assumption, the typical duration of a starforing espisode is 2× the median observed age. Using the ages and SFRs from the constant SFR fits, we get the median stellar mass to be 2(4) × 109h−2 100M⊙ for q0 = 0.5(0.05) -- in agreement with the value derived from instantaneous burst fits. As was the case for star formation rates, comparing dust-corrected UV fluxes to Leitherer et al. models confirms the above masses. The distributions of stellar masses for both the instantaneous burst and constant SFR models are shown in Figure 9(b -- c). In both scenarios, the stellar masses of Lyman break objects are generally smaller than the stellar mass of a present-day L∗ galaxy. Stellar masses appear to be relatively insensitive to the details of star formation history. As an illustration, the above analysis can also be applied to the fits obtained with dust-free models. For q0 = 0.5(0.05), under the instantaneous burst assumption, the resulting median stellar -- 10 -- mass is 1(4) × 109h−2 100M⊙. Using the ages and star formation rates of the constant-SFR fits gives the median stellar mass of 6(16) × 109h−2 100M⊙. These values, obtained from dust-free model fits, are surprisingly similar to the stellar masses derived from models which account for dust. In the instantaneous burst case, this agreement arises because the dust-free fits give older ages, which necessitates larger stellar masses to account for the observed fluxes. In the constant SFR case the agreement occurs because the lower star formation rate of the dust-free models are offset by their older ages. The relative insensitivity of the total stellar mass formed to the assumed star formation history and dust content of the galaxy allows us to obtain a robust result for the typical mass produced by a star formation episode in a Lyman break galaxy. Averaging the median masses calculated from the dust-corrected instantaneous burst and constant SFR fits, we have that the median stellar mass produced in an episode of star formation in an HDF Lyman break galaxy is ∼ 1.5(3) × 109h−2 100M⊙ for q0 = 0.5(0.05). This median stellar mass is within the 1010M⊙ upper limits on the gravitational masses of HDF Lyman break galaxies which were obtained by Lowenthal et al. (1997) on the basis of Lyα emission line widths and is equivalent to ∼ 1 10 ) the stellar mass of a present-day L∗ galaxy. 20 ( 1 4. IMPLICATIONS 4.1. Dust Corrections Intervening dust has the effect of absorbing UV photons ,thereby suppressing the observed UV flux. If, as the SED fits discussed in § 3.2 indicate, z > 2 objects have substantial amounts of internal reddening, recent measurements of the rates of star formation (Steidel et al. 1996a; Madau et al. 1996; Lowenthal et al. 1997) and metal ejection (Madau et al. 1996; Sawicki et al. 1997) need to be revised. Steidel et al. (1996a) have used rest-1500A fluxes to estimate the average star formation rate of their Lyman break galaxy sample to be 2h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.05). If we assume that their objects suffer from the same amount of reddening as is typical for the Lyman break objects in the Hubble Deep Field (E(B − V ) ≈ 0.28), then their SFR estimates need to be adjusted upward to 38h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.5 (and 6h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.5 (and to 111h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.05). On the basis of 1500A fluxes, Lowenthal et al. (1997) made estimates of star formation rates both in individual z ≈ 3 HDF objects and in the volume-averaged population. Reddening correction would bring the Lowenthal et al. range of star formation rates to 13 − 35h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.5 (31− 111h−2 100M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.05). The volume-averaged star formation rates given by Lowenthal et al. need likewise be adjusted upwards by a factor of ∼ 18. Madau et al. (1996) studied a sample of U- and B-band dropouts in the Hubble Deep Field. They used the comoving UV (1620 A at hzi = 2.75 and 1630 A at hzi = 4.0) luminosity densities -- 11 -- to estimate the volume-averaged rates of metal ejection and star formation. If we apply the typical E(B − V ) = 0.28 extinction found to occur in z > 2 galaxies, the Madau et al. estimates of both the star formation and metal ejection rates need to be revised upward by a factor of 16. This value is consistent with the factor of 15 derived by Meurer et al. (1997) on the basis of optical data alone and with the (as we have seen, correct) assumption of young ages. Note, however, that the Madau et al. (1996) estimates do not include incompleteness corrections, so they remain lower limits even after having been corrected for dust. As part of their photometric redshift study of the Hubble Deep Field, Sawicki et al. (1997) have calculated the expected metal density of the Universe as a function of redshift. To do so, they have used rest-3000A luminosity densities. Applying E(B − V ) = 0.28 of extinction yields a factor of 7 increase in flux at 3000A, requireing a factor of 7 increase in the 2 ∼< z ∼< 3.5 metallicity of the Universe shown in Fig. 10. of Sawicki et al. In summary, the values of star formation and metal ejection rates presented in the literature are underestimates, since they do not account for intrinsic reddening. Though the exact correction factors depend on the wavelength used for the original estimate, once correction for dust is made, both star formation and metal ejection rates go up by about an order of magnitude. Note that although the total mass of stars formed per object is similar for the dust-free and dust-included models (§ 3.5), the difference in the volume-averaged star formation and metal ejection rates of the Universe enters via the very different duty cycle of visibility which the Lyman break objects have in these two models. 4.2. Ages and Star Formation Histories of Lyman Break Galaxies For all but one of the z < 3 HDF Lyman break galaxies, the ages of the dominant stellar populations are < 0.2 Gyr. Since our redshift range (2 < z < 3.5) spans a Gyr in time, the lack of a significant number of galaxies with old (> 0.2 Gyr) stellar populations suggests that, in Lyman break galaxies, the duration of star formation is short rather than extended and continuous. In the rest of this section we will speculate on some of the possible interpretations of this episodic star formation. Using simple calculations, we will show that under this single-burst scenario the number densities of Lyman break objects, in addition to their stellar masses, are consistent with Lyman break objects being progenitors of present-day L < L∗ galaxies. They are unlikely to be the present-day L ≥ L∗ galaxies caught in the act of creation unless one invokes more complicated mechanisms such as mergers or recurrent bursts of star formation. In the simplest scenario, akin to the low-mass starburst model of Lowenthal et al. (1997), each Lyman break galaxy undergoes a single episode of star formation. Since the stellar mass produced in a typical Lyman break galaxy is ∼ 109h−2 100M⊙ (§ 3.5), such a burst would result in a low-mass object whose stellar mass is ∼ 1 20 that of a present-day L∗ galaxy. This typical mass is thus too low to account for the whole stellar mass of the bulge of a present-day L∗ galaxy. -- 12 -- The young ages of their stellar populations, together with the fact that they will fade rapidly after star formation ends (by ∼ 1 magnitude in a mere 30 Myr), mean that only a small fraction of such short-burst galaxies are visible at any one time. The redshift range covered by the HDF Lyman break sample (2 < z < 3.5), spans a time interval of ∼ 0.8 Gyr in a h100 = 0.7, q0 = 0.5 universe (∼ 2.3 Gyr for h100 = 0.7, q0 = 0.05). The median age from the 0.2Z⊙, constant SFR fits is ∼ 35 Myr. Assuming that a typical star-forming burst lasts twice that time, and that it takes ∼ 30 Myr for the galaxy to fade ∼ 1 magnitude (and hence out of the spectroscopic sample), we estimate that a typical Lyman break galaxy stays in the sample for ∼ 100 Myr. Therefore, for every galaxy that is detected, there will be ∼ 8 (∼ 23 for q0 = 0.05) objects which have faded beyond spectroscopic detectibility. Hence, in the volume and redshift range sampled, there should be a total of ∼ 136 (∼ 391, for q0 = 0.05) visible plus faded objects which are undergoing, or have undergone, brief but intense bursts of star formation. The comoving number density of this combined (both visible and faded) population is 7 × 100Mpc−3 for q0 = 0.05). In the Ks-band (which corresponds to ∼ rest- 100Mpc−3 (4 × 10−2h3 10−2h3 V ), the HDF Lyman break galaxies span a range of ∼ 2.5 magnitudes. Locally, over a corresponding magnitude range, one expects to see ∼ 2 × 10−2h−3 20 L∗ (Loveday et al. 1992; Lin et al. 1996). The number density of HDF Lyman break objects is thus similar to, or perhaps somewhat higher than, that of local 1 20 L∗ galaxies. Thus, on the basis of their number densities and stellar masses, Lyman break objects are consistent with being progenitors of present- day sub-L∗ galaxies. 100Mpc−3 galaxies with L ≈ 1 One could postulate that present-day L > L∗ galaxies formed through bursts of star formation which are analogous to those which seem to be producing the above-mentioned low-mass objects, but which are more intense though less numerous than the bursts seen in the HDF. Based on the present-day luminosity function of Lin et al. (1996), and assuming that the 17 objects seen in the HDF are precursors of present-day sub-L∗ galaxies, one would expect the HDF to yield ∼ 5 Lyman break objects with stellar masses ≥ 3×1010M⊙, the expected stellar mass of an L∗ galaxy. The fact that such massive stellar populations are absent (Figure 9) implies that most present-day massive galaxies did not form in single bursts of star formation at z > 2. There are, however, alternative ways to assemble massive objects. One option is through galaxy-galaxy merging: the present-day merger rate is rather low but increases as (1 + z)∼3−4, at least to moderate redshift (e.g., Yee & Ellingson 1995; Patton et al. 1997). If this redshift trend continues to z ∼ 3, then the merging of a dozen or so Lyman break objects can easily result in the spheroid of a present-day L∗ galaxy. Another possibility is akin to the "Christmas tree" model of Lowenthal et al. (1997; see also Colley et al. 1996). In this model, star formation is episodic but recurrent within each galaxy: star- forming episodes are separated by quiescent intervals during which the galaxy temporarily fades out of the sample. The underlying stellar population, resulting from previous star-forming bursts, would be too faded to be detectable in the presence of an ongoing burst (e.g., Ellingson et al. 1996). -- 13 -- Each of the recurrent star-forming bursts would then add, typically, ∼ 109h−2 the galaxy, gradually building up its stellar mass. A spheroid containing ∼ 3 × 1010h−1 of stars could be thus accumulated in a dozen or two such recurrent starburst episodes. 100M⊙ of new stars to 100M⊙ worth 5. CONCLUSIONS We have fitted the broadband spectral energy distributions of spectroscopically confirmed z > 2 HDF Lyman break objects, using the multi-metallicity spectral synthesis models of Bruzual & Charlot (1996). In the fits we have included correction for internal dust extinction typical of local star-forming galaxies (Calzetti 1997). The fits also assume that the IMF at high redshift is not unlike that seen locally, although some leeway is allowed, particularly in the lower mass cutoff. We find that Lyman break galaxies are dominated by very young stellar populations (< 0.2 Gyr). The absence of objects with old stellar populations, particularly at lower redshifts (z ∼> 2), implies that star formation in a typical Lyman break galaxy cannot go on continuously for a prolonged time. Instead, star formation must occur in bursts of short duration (t < 0.2 Gyr). A typical Lyman break galaxy is shrouded in enough dust to suppress its UV flux by a factor of ∼ 16 at 1600A. Consequently, recent UV-based estimates of the rates of star formation and metal ejection at high redshift (Steidel et al. 1996a; Madau et al. 1996; Sawicki et al. 1997; Lowenthal et al. 1997) need to be adjusted upwards by a similar factor. Star formation rates in Lyman break galaxies are high (median of 59h−2M⊙yr−1 for q0 = 0.5). These star formation rates typically produce 109h−2M⊙ of stellar mass during the lifetime of a star- forming episode; this number is robust as it is relatively insensitive to the details of star formation history and dust content. This median stellar mass is equivalent to 1 20 the stellar mass contained in a present-day L∗ galaxy. Objects with larger stellar masses may be built up through recurrent episodes of star formation, or can be assembled through mergers. 15 -- 1 A stellar population will fade rapidly after the end of a brief episode of star formation (∼ 1 magnitude at rest-2000A in the first 30 Myr). Because star formation in Lyman break galaxies is of brief duration, a substantial population of objects which have just recently faded out of the spectroscopic sample may exist at high redshift. We estimate that if a typical Lyman break galaxy stays in our sample for 0.1 Gyr, then there are 8 -- 23 such faded galaxies for every visible one. The 100 mag−1 Mpc−3) is number density of the combined visible and faded population (a few ×10−2 h3 comparable to the number density of present-day sub-L∗ (MB ∼> −18) galaxies. On the basis of the evidence presented above, we conclude that Lyman break objects are likely direct progenitors of present-day sub-L∗ galaxies, or that they may form luminous galaxies through merging or by repeated episodes of star formation. They do not appear to be steadily star-forming direct progenitors of present-day massive galaxies. -- 14 -- We thank Gabriela Mall´en-Ornelas for a very thorough reading of an earlier version of this paper. We also thank Huan Lin, Bob Abraham, Gerhardt Meurer, and the anonymous referee for discussions and comments. This work was financially supported by NSERC of Canada. -- 15 -- REFERENCES Bechtold, J., Yee, H.K.C., Elton, R., & Ellingson, E. 1997, ApJ, 477, L29 Bouchet, P., Lequeux, J., Maurice, E., Pr´evot, L., & Pr´evot-Burnichon, M. L. 1985, A&A, 149, 330 Bruzual A., G., & Charlot, S. 1993, ApJ, 405, 538 Bruzual A., G., & Charlot, S. 1996, in preparation Calzetti D., 1997, to appear in the Proceedings of the Conference "The Ultraviolet Universe at Low and High Redshift" preprint: astro-ph/9706121 Calzetti, D., Kinney, A., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582 Cohen, J. G., Cowie, L. L., Hogg, D. W., Songaila, A., Blandford, R., Hu, E. M., & Snopbell, P. 1996, ApJ, 471, L5 Colley, W.N., Gnedin, O.Y., Ostriker, J.P., & Rhoads, J.E 1997, ApJ, 488, 579 Connolly, A.J., Szalay, A.S., Dickinson, M., SubbaRao, M.U., & Brunner, R.J. 1997, ApJ, 486, L11 Cowie, L.C., Hu, E.M., & Songaila, A. 1995, Nature, 377, 603 Dickinson, M. 1996, http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/science/hdf/clearinghouse/irim/irim zeropts.html Dickinson, M., et al. 1997, in preparation. Ellingson, E., Yee, H.K.C., Bechtold, J., & Elston, R. 1996, ApJ, 466, L71 Ferguson, H. 1996, http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/observer/hdf/logs/zeropoints.txt Fitzpatrick, E.L., 1986, AJ, 92, 1068 Fomalont, E. B., Kellermann, K. I., Richards, E. A., Windhorst, R. A., & Partridge, B. P. 1997, ApJ, 475, L5 Giavalisco, M., Steidel, C.C., & Macchetto, F.D. 1996, ApJ, 470, 189 Gordon, K. D., Calzetti, D., & Witt, A. N. 1997, ApJ, 487, 626 Hogg, D.W., Neugebauer, G., Armus, L., Matthews, K., Pahre, M.A., Soifer, B.T., & Weinberger, A.J. 1997, AJ, 113, 474 Leitherer, C., Robert, C., & Heckman, T.M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 173 Lin, H., Kirshner, R.P., Shectman, S.A., Landy, S.D., Oemler, A., Tucker, D., & Schechter, P.L. 1996, ApJ, 464, 60 -- 16 -- Loveday, J., Peterson, B.A., Efstathiou, G., & Maddox, S.J. 1992, ApJ, 390, 338 Lowenthal, J.D., Koo, D.C., Guzm´an, R., Gallego, J., Phillips, A.C., Vogt, N.P., Illingworth, G.D., & Gronwall, C. 1997, ApJ, 481, 673 Lu, L., Sargent, W.L.W., Barlow, T.A., Churchill, C.W., & Vogt, S.S. 1996, ApJS, 107, 475 Madau, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 18 Madau, P., Ferguson, H.C., Dickinson, M.E., Giavalisco, M., Steidel, C.C., & Fruchter, A. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 1388 Massey, P., Lang, C.C., DeGioia-Eastwood, K., & Garmany, C.D. 1995, ApJ, 438, 188 Meurer, G.R., Heckman, T.M., Lehnert, M.D., Leitherer, C., & Lowenthal, J. 1997, AJ, 114, 54 Pascarelle, S. M., Windhorst, R. A., Keel, W. C., & Odewahn, S. C. 1996, Nature, 383, 45 Patton, D.R., Pritchet, C.J., Yee, H.K.C., Ellingson, E., & Carlberg, R.G. 1997, ApJ, 475, 29 Pettini, M., Smith, L.J., Hunstead, R.W., & King, D.L. 1994, ApJ, 426, 79 Pettini, M., King, D.L., Smith, L.J., & Hunstead, R.W. 1997, ApJ, 478, 536 Pettini, M., Steidel, C.C., Adelberger, K.L., Kellogg, M., Dickinson, M., & Giavalisco, M. 1997, to appear in Origins, ed. J.M. Shull, C.E. Woodward, and H. Thronson (ASP Conference Series); preprint: astro-ph/9708117 Sawicki, M.J., Lin, H., & Yee, H.K.C. 1997, AJ, 113, 1 Serjeant, S., Eaton, N., Oliver, S., Efstathiou, A., Goldschmidt, P., Mann, R.G., Mobasher, B., Rowan-Robinson, M., Sumner, T., Danese, L., Elbaz, D., Franceschini, A., Egami, E., Kontizas, M., Lawrence, A., McMahon, R., Norgaard-Nielsen, H.U., Perez-Fournon, I., & Gonzalez-Serrano, I. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 457 Stasi´nska, G., & Leitherer, C. 1996, ApJS, 107, 472 Steidel, C. C., Giavalisco, M., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., & Adelberger, K.L. 1996a, ApJ, 462, L17 Steidel, C. C., Giavalisco, M., Dickinson, M., & Adelberger, K.L. 1996b, AJ, 112, 352 Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., Pettini, M., Kellogg, M. 1997, ApJ, in press, preprint: astro-ph/9708125 Wemstaker, W. 1981, A&A, 97, 329 Williams, R. E., Blacker, B., Dickinson, M., Van Dyke Dixon, W., Ferguson, H. C., Fruchter, A. S., Giavalisco, M., Gilliland, R. L., Heyer, I., Katsanis, R., Levay, Z., Lucas, R. A., McElroy, D. B., Petro, L., Postman, M., Adorf, H.-M., & Hook, R. N. 1996, AJ, 112, 1335 -- 17 -- Worthey, G. 1994, ApJS, 95, 107 Yee, H.K.C. 1991, PASP, 103, 396 Yee, H.K.C., & Ellingson, E. 1995 ApJ, 445, 37 Yee, H.K.C., Ellingson, E., Bechtold, J., Carlberg, R. G., & Cuillandre, J.-C. 1996 AJ, 111, 1783 Zepf, S.E., Moustakas, L.A., & Davis, M. 1997, ApJ, 474, L1 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. -- 18 -- Table 1. Photometry object ref z U300,AB B450,AB V606,AB I814,AB JAB HAB Ks,AB C2-05 hd2 0725 1818 hd2 2030 0287 hd2 0624 0266 C4-08 C3-02 C4-06a C4-06b hd4 0367 0266 hd4 2030 0851 hd2 0434 1377 hd2 1410 0259 hd2 1359 1816 C4-09 hd3 0408 0684 hd2 0705 1366 hd2 0698 1297 S L L L S S Sa Sa L L L L L S L L L 2.008 2.233 2.267 2.419 2.591 2.775 2.803 2.803 2.931 2.980 2.991 3.160 3.181 3.226 3.233 3.368 3.430 25.72(06) 25.83(05) 26.46(06) 28.09(29) 28.62(46) 25.84(05) 27.67(22) 27.33(12) 25.45(08) > 29.37 29.74(26) 29.97(90) > 29.56 26.81(19) > 29.26 27.55(21) > 29.28 23.69(03) 24.39(03) 24.47(03) 25.14(03) 24.57(03) 24.64(03) 24.59(03) 24.36(03) 24.77(04) 25.39(04) 25.54(04) 25.38(04) 25.82(04) 25.01(03) 25.88(04) 26.05(04) 26.55(05) 23.47(03) 24.28(03) 24.35(03) 25.06(03) 24.50(03) 24.54(03) 23.47(03) 24.03(03) 23.87(03) 24.74(04) 24.66(03) 24.72(03) 24.76(03) 24.12(03) 24.89(04) 25.04(03) 25.19(03) 23.17(03) 24.19(03) 24.35(04) 25.09(04) 24.31(03) 24.50(03) 23.08(03) 23.81(03) 23.54(03) 24.45(04) 24.37(03) 24.66(04) 24.35(03) 23.87(03) 24.40(04) 24.95(03) 24.81(03) 22.79(05) 24.60(24) 24.16(15) 24.85(21) 24.48(17) 24.09(13) 22.97(07) 23.46(08) 23.73(18) 23.97(15) 24.64(19) 26.02(97) 24.25(15) 23.60(09) 25.15(63) 26.08(74) 25.28(32) 22.65(07) 23.73(17) 24.70(46) 24.55(35) 24.50(32) > 24.27 21.96(05) 23.13(09) 22.54(11) 23.97(27) 24.20(22) 24.58(56) 23.73(15) 24.01(24) 24.98(78) 24.24(21) 24.93(45) 22.23(05) 23.69(16) 24.22(30) 24.52(31) 24.17(22) 24.33(25) 21.82(04) 22.87(08) 22.39(09) 23.35(12) 24.18(20) 23.83(20) 24.47(26) 22.67(07) 23.47(17) 24.47(23) 23.62(12) aSince object C4-06 has two very distinct components, we have treated it as two objects at the same redshift. C4-06a is the lower object in the C4-06 panel of Fig. 2 of Steidel et al. (1996b), while C4-06b is the upper object. Note. -- Upper limits (2σ) are indicated with a ">". Errors are indicated in parentheses: they are 1σ uncertainties expressed as percentages of the flux. References. -- (S) Steidel et al. (1996b); (L) Lowenthal et al. (1997) -- 19 -- Fig. 1. -- The best-fitting 0.2Z⊙, constant SFR models. Dust content and age are free parameters. Although their fluxes are plotted, the U300 and B450 data were not used in the fit (see text). The model SEDs shown include the high-z Lyman suppression of the U V flux. The bottom two rows contain objects at z > 3 -- objects for which fit quality suffers from the fact that only one filter is present redward the Balmer break. Instantaneous burst and 0.02Z⊙ and 1.0Z⊙ models produced fits of similar quality as the ones shown here. -- 20 -- Fig. 2. -- Reddening and age of the best-fit Z = 0.2Z⊙ models. The top panel shows the constant SFR fits and the bottom one is for the instantaneous burst model. Age is the time since the onset of star formation. Galaxies at z < 3 are shown as solid symbols while those at z > 3, for which fit quality is poorer, use broken ones. Error bars come from χ2 fitting and correspond to 90% confidence limits. Z = 0.02Z⊙ and 1.0Z⊙ models produce similar results. Fig. 3. -- Intrinsic reddening for the 6 models of different metallicity and star formation his- tory. The shaded histogram corresponds to those galaxies at z < 3, while the unshaded one is for all 17 objects (i.e., including the lower-quality z > 3 fits). Arrows indicate the median values of E(B − V ) for the z < 3 galaxies. Substantial amounts of dust are present under all scenarios. -- 21 -- Fig. 4. -- Examples of fits with and without dust for the Z = 0.2Z⊙ constant SFR models. The broken line shows the best-fit models for which age was allowed to vary freely, but E(B − V ) was held at 0. The solid line shows the best-fit model (as in Figure 1) for which both age and dust were free parameters. Models with dust produce better fits than the dust-free ones. Fig. 5. -- Ages since the onset of the cur- rent episodes of star formation. The shaded his- togram corresponds to those galaxies at z < 3, while the unshaded one is for all 17 objects. Ages > 0.5 Gyr are grouped together in the right-most bins (separated from the other bins by the dot- ted lines). Most Lyman break galaxies are dom- inated by very young stellar populations. -- 22 -- Fig. 6. -- Examples of fits with and without forced age for the Z = 0.2Z⊙ constant SFR mod- els. The broken lines are the fits for which age was fixed at 1 Gyr (while reddening was allowed to vary freely). The solid lines are the fits where, as in Figure 1, both age and reddening were free parameters. Instantaneous burst models of 1 Gyr age would produce an even stronger dis- agreement with the data, since in those models the UV-producing massive stars would not have continued to be replenished as in the constant SFR models. Fig. 7. -- The ages of dominant stellar popula- tions of Lyman break galaxies determined by fit- ting 0.2Z⊙ model SEDs. Error bars correspond to 90% confidence limits. For comparison, the dotted lines show the age of the universe and the age of an object which formed at zf = 4.5; both are for a Ω = 1 universe with a present- day age fixed at t0 = 12.5 Gyr; note, however, that the stellar population ages do not depend on the value of H0. Objects at z > 3 suffer from poor coverage above ∼ 4000 A and, con- sequently, have age estimates of lower quality. Models with Z = 0.02Z⊙ and 1.0Z⊙ produce ages similar to these shown here. Stellar popu- lations of the majority of z > 2 HDF galaxies appear to have undergone recent (t < 0.2 Gyr) episodes of star formation. -- 23 -- Fig. 8. -- Distribution of star formation rates obtained from the 0.2Z⊙ constant SFR fits. A q0 = 0.5 universe was assumed. The shaded his- togram is for the eleven z < 3 galaxies, and the unshaded one includes all 17 objects. The me- dian value for the z < 3 subset is indicated. Fig. 9. -- Stellar masses from the 0.2Z⊙ fits. Shaded histograms are for z < 3 galaxies, and the unshaded ones include all 17 objects. Arrows indicate median values for the z < 3 subset. A q0 = 0.5 universe was assumed. Panel (a) shows the distribution of stellar masses obtained from the instantaneous burst fits. The stellar mass of a present-day L∗ galaxy (3 × 1010h−1 100M⊙; Cowie et al., 1995) is indicated for comparison. Panel (b) shows the distribution of stellar masses de- rived by multiplying the objects' star formation rates and the ages of their stellar populations. Under both the instantaneous burst and con- stant SFR scenarios, stellar masses produced by the observed episodes of star formation are gen- erally substantially less than the stellar mass of a present-day L∗ galaxy.
astro-ph/9910191	2	9910	1999-11-19T08:39:50	Compton Dragged Gamma--Ray Bursts associated with Supernovae	[ "astro-ph" ]	It is proposed that the gamma-ray photons that characterize the prompt emission of Gamma-Ray Bursts are produced through the Compton drag process, caused by the interaction of a relativistic fireball with a very dense soft photon bath. If gamma-ray bursts are indeed associated with Supernovae, then the exploding star can provide enough soft photons for radiative drag to be effective. This model accounts for the basic properties of gamma-ray bursts, i.e. the overall energetics, the peak frequency of the spectrum and the fast variability, with an efficiency which can exceed 50%. In this scenario there is no need for particle acceleration in relativistic collisionless shocks. Furthermore, though Poynting flux may be important in accelerating the outflow, no magnetic field is required in the gamma-ray production. The drag also naturally limits the relativistic expansion of the fireball to Gamma < 10^4.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Submitted to ApJ Letters, Oct. 11, 1999 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 04/03/99 9 9 9 1 v o N 9 1 2 v 1 9 1 0 1 9 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a COMPTON DRAGGED GAMMA -- RAY BURSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERNOVAE Davide Lazzati1, Gabriele Ghisellini Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Bianchi 46, I -- 23807 Merate (Lc), Italy Annalisa Celotti Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, via Beirut 2/4, I -- 34014 Trieste, Italy and Martin J. Rees Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, U.K. Submitted to ApJ Letters, Oct. 11, 1999 ABSTRACT It is proposed that the gamma -- ray photons that characterize the prompt emission of Gamma -- Ray Bursts are produced through the Compton drag process, caused by the interaction of a relativistic fireball with a very dense soft photon bath. If gamma -- ray bursts are indeed associated with Supernovae, then the exploding star can provide enough soft photons for radiative drag to be effective. This model accounts for the basic properties of gamma -- ray bursts, i.e. the overall energetics, the peak frequency of the spectrum and the fast variability, with an efficiency which can exceed 50%. In this scenario there is no need for particle acceleration in relativistic collisionless shocks. Furthermore, though Poynting flux may be important in accelerating the outflow, no magnetic field is required in the gamma -- ray production. The drag also naturally limits the relativistic expansion of the fireball to Γ ∼< 104. Subject headings: gamma rays: bursts -- supernovae: general -- radiation mechanisms: non -- thermal 1. INTRODUCTION In the leading scenario for GRBs and afterglows, the gamma -- ray event is produced by internal shocks in a hyper -- relativistic inhomogeneous wind (Rees & M´esz´aros 1994) while the afterglow is produced as the fireball drives a shock wave in the external interstellar medium (M´esz´aros & Rees 1997). Even if there is a large consensus that both gamma -- rays and afterglow photons are produced by the synchrotron process, recently some doubts have been cast on the synchrotron interpretation for the burst itself (Liang 1997; Ghisellini & Celotti 1998; Ghisellini, Celotti & Lazzati 1999). The nature of the progenitor is still a matter of active debate, as the sudden release of a huge amount of energy in a compact region generating a fireball does not keep trace of the way this energy has been produced. For this reason, the study of the interactions of the fireball with the surrounding medium seems to be the most powerful mean to unveil the GRB progenitor. At least two models are in competition: the merging of a binary system com- posed of two compact objects (Eichler et al. 1989) and the Hypernova -- Collapsar model (Woosley 1993, Paczy´nski 1998), i.e. the core collapse of a very massive star to form a black hole. After the discovery and the multiwavelength observa- tions of many afterglows, circumstantial evidence has ac- cumulated for GRB exploding in dense regions, associated to supernova -- like phenomena. In fact, (a) host galaxies have been detected in many cases (Sahu et al. 1997; see Wheeler 1999 for a review), and some of them show star- burst activity (Djorgovski et al. 1998, Hogg & Fructher 1999); (b) large hydrogen column densities have sometimes been detected in X -- ray afterglows (Owens et al. 1998); (c) non -- detections of several X -- ray afterglows in the optical band can be due to dust absorption (Paczy´nski 1998); (d) a possible iron line feature has been detected in the X -- ray afterglow of GRB 970508 (Piro et al. 1999, Lazzati et al. 1999) and (e) the rapid decay with time of several after- glows can be explained by the presence of a pre -- explosion wind from a very massive star (Chevalier & Li 1999). More recently, the possible presence of supernova (SN) emission in the late afterglows light curves of GRB 970228 (Galama et al. 1999, Reichert 1999) and GRB 980326 (Bloom et al. 1999) has added support in favor of the association of some GRBs with the final evolutionary stages of massive stars. Although in these models the available energy is larger than in the case of compact binary mergers, the very small efficiency of internal shocks (see, e.g., Spada, Panaitescu & M´esz´aros 1999) seems to be inconsistent with the fact that more energy can be released during the burst proper than the afterglow (Paczy´nski 1999, see also Kumar & Piran 1999). In this letter we show that if GRBs are associated with supernovae, Compton drag inside the relativistic wind can produce both the expected energetics and the peak en- ergy of the spectrum of a classical long duration GRB. In this new scenario the efficiency is not limited by internal shock interactions, and the successful modeling of after- glows with external shocks is left unaffected. The Compton drag effect has been already invoked for GRBs by Zdziarski et al. (1991) and Shemi (1994). Cos- mic background radiation (at high redshift), central re- gions of globular clusters and AGNs were identified as plausible sources of soft photons, but none of these scenarii 1Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 16, I -- 20133 Milano, Italy 1 2 was able to account for all the main properties of GRBs. However, the growing evidence of association of GRB ex- plosions with star -- forming regions and supernovae opens new perspectives for this scenario. 2. COMPTON DRAG IN A RELATIVISTIC WIND We consider a relativistic (Γ ≫ 1) wind of plasma prop- agating in a bath of photons with typical energy ǫseed. A fraction ∼ min(1, τT) of the photons are scattered by the inverse Compton (IC) effect to energies ǫ ∼ Γ2ǫseed, where τT is the Thomson opacity of the wind. Due to relativistic aberration, the scattered photons propagate in a narrow cone forming an angle 1/Γ with the velocity vector of wind propagation. By this process, a net amount of energy ECD is converted from kinetic energy of the wind to a radiation field propagating in the direction of the wind itself, where ECD ∼ min(1, τT) V urad (Γ2 − 1). V is volume filled by the soft photon field of energy density urad swept up by the wind. Let us assume that the GRB fireball, instead of being made by a number of individual shells (see e.g. Lazzati et al. 1999), is an unsteady (both in velocity and density) relativistic wind, expanding from a central point. After an initial acceleration phase, the density of the outflowing wind decreases with radius as n(r) ∝ r−2, giving a scatter- ing probability ∼ min[1, (r/r0)−2], where r0 is the radius at which the scattering probability equals unity. After the first scattering, the photons propagates in the same direc- tion of the flow and the probability of a second scattering is reduced by a factor ∼ Γ2. If such a wind flows in a radiation field with energy den- sity urad(r), the total energy transferred to the photons when the fireball reaches a distance R is given by2: ECD(R) = 4πΓ2"Z r0 urad(r)r2dr +Z R r2 r0 0 0urad(r)r2dr# (1) where for simplicity we assume that a constant Γ has been reached (see also Section 3). The transparency radius r0 depends on the baryon loading of the fireball, which is pa- rameterized by ηb ≡ E/(M c2), where E/M is the ratio between the total energy and the rest mass of the fireball. Then r0 is given by3: r0 = 5.9 × 1013E1/2 52 η−1/2 {b,2} cm. (2) 2.1. A simple scenario We initially consider a simple scenario which can il- lustrate the basic features of the Compton drag effect. Let us assume that the GRB is triggered at a time ∆t (of the order of a few hours) after the explosion of a supernova (Woosley et al. 1999; Cheng & Dai 1999). By this time, the supernova ejecta, moving with veloc- ity βSNc, have reached a distance RSN = vSN∆t ∼ 5.4 × 1013β{SN,−1}(∆t/5 hr) cm. Let us also imagine that the supernova explosion is asymmetric, e.g. with no ejecta in the polar directions. Despite this asymmetry, the ejecta uniformly fill with radiation the entire volume within RSN. If RSN < r0, the energy extracted by Compton drag is: ECD = ECD = 4πR3 3 4πr3 0 3 SN Γ2 urad RSN ≤ r0 (3) Γ2 urad(cid:18)3 RSN r0 − 2(cid:19) RSN > r0. (4) According to Woosley et al. (1994), the average lumi- nosity of a type II supernova4 during ∆t is of the order of LSN ∼ 1044 erg s −1, with a black body emission at a temperature TSN ∼ 105 K. It follows that in this case {SN,5} erg cm−3 (consistent with urad = aT 4 RSN assumed above). The efficiency ξ of Compton drag in extracting the fireball energy is very large; from Eq. 3 we obtain: SN ∼ 7.6 × 105T 4 ξ ≡ ECD E ∼ 0.6 E−1 52 β3 5 h(cid:19)3 {SN,−1}(cid:18) ∆t {SN,5} Γ2 T 4 2, (5) Note here that a high efficiency can be reached even for Γ ∼ 100. Note that the drag itself can limit the maximum speed of the expansion -- even in a wind with a very small barion loading -- as discussed in Sect. 3. Each seed pho- ton is boosted by ∼ 2Γ2 in frequency, yielding a spectrum peaking at hν ∼ 2Γ2(3kTSN) ∼ 0.5Γ2 2T{SN,5} MeV. 2.2. A more realistic scenario The previous scenario requires that the GRB explodes a few hours after a supernova. There is however a plausible alternative, independent of whether the massive (> 30M⊙) star (assumed to be the progenitor of the GRB) ends up with a supernova explosion or not, and can produce a gamma -- ray burst even if the relativistic flow and the core collapse of the progenitor star are simultaneous or sepa- rated by a relatively small time interval (Woosley et al. 1999; MacFadyen, Woosley & Heger 1999). In fact there is a somewhat general consensus (e.g. Mac- Fadyen & Woosley 1999; Aloy et a. 1999, but see also Khokhlov et al. 1999) that a relativistic wind can flow in a relatively baryon free funnel created by a bow shock following the collapse of the iron core of the star. Even if details of this class of models are still controversial, the formation of the funnel seems to be a general outcome. Let us estimate its luminosity and more precisely the amount of energy in radiation crossing the funnel walls at a time tf after its creation. With respect to the total luminos- ity of the star, assuming it radiates at its Eddington limit ∼ LEdd, there would be a reduction by the geometrical fac- tor equal to the ratio of the funnel to star surfaces, which is of the order of the funnel opening angle ϑ. However, im- mediately after its creation, the funnel luminosity is much larger than ϑLEdd, due to two effects which we discuss in turn. First the walls of the funnel contain an enhanced amount of radiation with respect to the surface layers of the star: the radiation once "trapped" in the interior of the star can escape through the funnel walls, thus enhancing the 2All the calculations are made in spherical symmetry. In case of beaming, all the quoted numbers should be considered as equivalent isotropic values. 3Here and in the following we adopt the notation Q = 10xQx, using cgs units 4This luminosity decreases by a factor ∼ 100 for type Ibc supernovae, while the typical frequency increases by a factor of 10. luminosity inside the funnel for a short time. Photons produced at a distance s from the wall surface cross it at a time tf ∼ τss/c = σns2/c, where σ is the relevant cross section. This compares with the Kelvin time tK ∼ σnR2 ⋆/c needed for radiation to reach the star surface, yielding s/R⋆ ∼ (tf /tK)1/2. After the time tf , the radiation pro- duced in the layer of width ds crosses the funnel surface carrying the energy dEf ∼ ϑτ⋆LEddds/c, the correspond- ing luminosity being: Lf ∼ ϑ 2 LEdd (cid:18) τ⋆R⋆ ctf (cid:19)1/2 . (6) For tf = 100 s and a 10M⊙ star with R⋆ ∼ 1013 cm (τ⋆ ≈ 108), this effect can enhance the funnel luminosity by ∼ 104. Let us now consider a second plausible enhancing fac- tor. If the funnel has been produced by the propagation of a bow -- shock in the star, the matter in front of the ad- vancing front is compressed, with a pressure increase of M2, where M is the Mach number of the shock in the star. This (optically thick) gas then flows along the sides of the funnel and relaxes adiabatically to the pressure of the external matter (its original pressure). The result is that the funnel is surrounded by a sheath (cocoon) with density lower than that of the unshocked stellar material by a factor M3/2 (a polytropic index of 4/3 has been used in the adiabatic cooling). The diffusion of photons through this rarefied gas into the funnel is then even faster, result- ing in a further increase of the luminosity by M3/4 ∼ 200, where a shock speed βsf c = 0.1c (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) and a sound speed βsc = 10−4c have been assumed. By taking into account both effects, the funnel luminos- ity corresponds to: Lf ∼ LEdd ∼ 1045ϑ−1 M⋆ 10M⊙ erg s−1, ϑ 2 (cid:18) τ⋆R⋆ ctf (cid:19)1/2(cid:18) βsf βs (cid:19)3/4 (7) which leads to an energy loss for Compton drag LCD ∼ Γ2Lf ∼ 1049ϑ−1Γ2 2(M⋆/10M⊙), to be compared with the observed luminosity hLGRBi ∼ 1049πϑ2 −1 erg s−1. Here the average luminosity is considered over the entire burst duration: for single pulses, we should take into account an extra factor Γ2 in Eq. 7 due to the Doppler contraction of the observed time. The typical radiation temperature associated with this luminosity, assuming a black body spectrum, is enhanced with respect to the temperature of the star surface by [Lf /(ϑLEdd)]1/4 ∼ (τ⋆R⋆)1/8(ctf )−1/8(βsf /βs)3/16. Adopt- ing the numerical values used above, the enhancement is of the order of 50, corresponding to a funnel temperature Tf ∼ 2 × 105 K (for a surface temperature of the star of ∼5000 K). This value is similar to the one estimated in the simple scenario of the previous subsection and thus leads to similar Compton frequencies. 3. PROPERTIES OF THE OBSERVED BURSTS If the wind is homogeneous the spectrum of the scat- tered photons resembles that of the incident photons, i.e. a broad black -- body continuum peaked at a temperature Tdrag ∼ 2 Γ2T . While the observed characteristic photon energy would be therefore ǫ ∼ 0.5Γ2 2 T5(1 + z)−1 MeV, 3 in good agreement with the observed distribution of peak energies of BATSE GRBs (assuming again Γ = 100, see below), the spectrum would not reproduce the observed smoothly broken power -- law shape (Band et al. 1993). The assumptions of a perfectly homogeneous wind and of an isothermal radiation field are however very crude, and one might reasonably expect that different regions of the wind are characterized by different values of Γ and dif- ferent soft field temperatures. If we assume, e.g., that the temperature of the soft photon field varies with ra- dius according to a power -- law T (r) ∝ r−δ, the time in- tegrated spectrum will have a high energy power -- law tail F (ν) ∝ ν− 3−3δ In addition, the bulk Lorentz factor of the flow is likely to vary on a timescale much shorter than the integration time required to obtain a spectrum with the BATSE data (∼ 1 s), and hence the analysed spec- tra are the superposition of drag spectra by many differ- ent Lorentz factors. A third effect adding power to the high energy tails of the spectrum is the reflection of up -- scattered photons in the pre -- supernova wind. This pho- tons are scattered again by the fireball and can reach ener- gies of ∼ 0.5Γ MeV ∼ 50Γ2 MeV. The computation of the actual spectrum resulting from all these effects depends from many assumptions and is beyond the scope of this work. . δ The effects described above, which can increase the fun- nel luminosity over the Eddington limit, take place in non -- stationary conditions. At the wind onset, it is likely that the temperature gradient in the walls of the funnel is large, but this is soon erased due to the high luminosity of the walls. This causes both the total flux and the character- istic frequency of the soft photons to decrease, and hence a hard -- to -- soft trend is expected. Moreover, it has been shown by Liang & Kargatis (1996) that the peak frequency of the spectrum in a single pulse at time t is strongly re- lated to the flux of the pulse integrated from the beginning of the pulse to the time t. In our scenario, this behaviour can be easily accounted for if we consider a shell slowed down by the drag itself: the Lorentz factor (and hence the peak frequency of the spectrum) at a time t is related to the energy lost by the shell, i.e. to the integral of the flux from the beginning of the pulse to the time t. The observed minimum variability time -- scale is related to the typical size of the region containing the dense seed photon field, which corresponds to either R⋆ or RSN de- pending on which of the two scenarios described above applies. The relevant light crossing time -- divided by the time compression factor -- is thus tvar ∼ R cΓ2 ∼ 3 × 10−2 R13 Γ−2 2 s. (8) Longer time -- scales are instead expected if the relativistic wind is smooth and continuous. Another interesting feature of this scenario is the pos- sibility that the bulk Lorentz factor of the wind is self -- consistently limited by the drag itself. The pressure of the soft photons starts braking the fireball in competi- tion with the pressure of internal photons. The limiting Lorentz factor is hence reached when the internal pressure p′ fb ∝ (T0/Γ)4 is balanced by the pressure of the exter- nal photons as observed in the fireball comoving frame p′ ∝ Γ2 T 4 SN (1 + τT)−1, where τT is the scattering optical 4 depth of the wind. This gives: Γlim ∼ 2 × 104 T −1/2 {SN,5} E1/4 52 R−5/8 {0,7} η−1/8 {b,5}, (9) where R0 is the radius at which the fireball is released. Equation 9 reduces to Γlim ∼ 104(T0,11/TSN,5)2/3 if the fireball becomes transparent before reaching the coasting phase. With such high Γ the Compton drag would be max- imally efficient, causing the fireball to immediately decel- erate until its Γ reaches the value given by LCD = Lf Γ2, implying: Γ = (cid:18) Lkin Lf (cid:19)1/2 ∼ 300 (cid:18) L{kin,50} L{f,45} (cid:19)1/2 . (10) These limits are in general smaller than the maximum Γ set by the baryon load only, but still in agreement with values recently inferred for GRB 990123 (Sari & Piran 1999). In addition, it is likely that the external parts of the relativistic wind, which are in closer connection with the funnel walls, are dragged more efficiently then the cen- tral ones, since at the beginning the soft photons coming from the walls can penetrate only a small fraction of the funnel before being up -- scattered by relativistic electrons. This may result in a polar structured wind, with higher Lorentz factors along the symmetry axis, gradually de- creasing as the polar angle increases. 4. DISCUSSION A crucial requirement of our model is the association of GRBs with the final evolutionary stages of very massive stars, as these provide the large amount of seed photons emitted at distances ∼ 1013 cm from the central trigger, which are neeeded for the Compton drag to be efficient. The efficiency of conversion of bulk kinetic energy of the flow into gamma -- ray photons is large, solving the ob- servational challenge of gamma -- ray emission being more energetic than the afterglow one (Paczy´nski 1999). Fur- thermore in this scenario there is no requirement for ei- ther efficient acceleration in collisionless shocks or the presence/generation of an intense (equipartition) magnetic field, although Poynting flux may still be important in ac- celerating the outflow (being more efficient than neutrino reconversion into pairs). We have investigated the main properties of a GRB produced by Compton drag in a relativistic wind in a very general case. A moderately beamed burst (ϑ ∼< 10◦, Woosley et al. 1999) can be thus produced and, without any fine tuning of the parameters, the basic features of classic GRBs are accounted for. In particular, the peak energy of the burst emission sim- ply reflects the temperature of the supernova seed photons, up -- scattered by the square of the bulk Lorentz factor. The simplest hypothesis predicts a quasi -- thermal spec- trum, however it is easy to imagine an effective multi -- temperature distribution which would depend on uncon- strained quantities such as the variation of the spectrum of the SN photons with radius and the degree of inhomo- geneity of the wind. Although in this scenario there is no requirement for internal shocks to set up, they can of course occur, con- tributing a small fraction of the observed gamma -- ray flux. On the other hand, the wind is expected to escape from the funnel of the star with still highly relativistic motion, so that an external shock can be driven in the interstellar medium and produce an afterglow, similar to the scenario already studied by several authors. It is likely that this af- terglow would develop in a non -- uniform density medium, due to the presence of the massive star wind occurring before the supernova explosion (Chevalier & Li 1999). We thank Andy Fabian, Francesco Haardt, Piero Madau and Giorgio Matt for many stimulating discussions. DL thanks the Institute of Astronomy for the kind hospitality during the preparation of this work. The Cariplo Founda- tion (DL) and Italian MURST (AC) are acknowledged for financial support. REFERENCES Aloy, M. A., Mueller, E., Ibanez, J. M., Marti, J. M. & MacFadyen, A., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/9911098) Band, D. et al., 1993, ApJ, 413, 281 Bloom, J. S., et al., 1999, Nature, 401, 453 Cheng, K. S. & Dai, Z. G., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/9908248) Chevalier, R. A. & Li, Z., 1999, ApJ, 520, L29 Djorgovski, S. G., Kulkarni, S. R., Bloom, J. S., Goodrich, R., Frail, D. A., Piro, L., Palazzi, E., 1998, ApJ, 508, L17 Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T. & Schramm, D. M., 1989, Nature, 340, 126 & Taylor, G. B., 1997, Nature, 389, 261 Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., Hartmann, D. H., 1999, ApJ in press (astro-ph/9904122) Galama, T. J., et al., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/9907264) Ghisellini, G. & Celotti, A., 1998, ApJ, 511, L93 Ghisellini, G., Celotti, A. & Lazzati, D., 1999, MNRAS submitted Hogg, D.W., & Fruchter, A.S., 1999, ApJ, 520, 54 Khokhlov, A. M., Hoflich, P., Oran, S. E., Wheeler, J. C. & Wang, L., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/9904419) Kumar, P. & Piran, T., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/9909014) Lazzati, D., Campana, S. & Ghisellini, G., 1999a, MNRAS, 302, L31 Lazzati, D., Ghisellini, D., & Celotti, A., 1999b, MNRAS309 L13 Liang, E. P. & Kargatis, V., 1996, Nature, 381, 49 Liang, E. P., 1997, ApJ, 491, L15 Owens, A. et al., 1998, A&A, 339, L37 MacFadyen, A & Woosley, S. E., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro- ph/9810274) MacFadyen, A, Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/9910034) M´esz´aros, P. & Rees, M. J., 1997, ApJ, 476, 232 Piro, L. et al., 1999, ApJ, 514, L73 Paczy´nski, B., 1986, ApJ, 308, L43 Paczy´nski, B., 1998, ApJ, 494, L45 Paczy´nski, B., 1999, to appear in: "The Largest Explosions Since the Big Bang: Supernovae and Gamma Ray Bursts" (astro- ph/9909048) Rees, M. J. & M´esz´aros, P., 1994, ApJ, 430, L93 Reichart, D. E., 1999, ApJ, 512, L111 Sari, R. & Piran, T., 1999, ApJ, 517, L109 Sahu, K., Livio, M., Petro, L. & Macchetto, D. F., 1997, IAU Circ. 6606 Shemi, A., 1994, MNRAS, 269, 1112 Spada, M., Panaitescu, A. & M´esz´aros, P., 1999, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/9908097) Wheeler, J. C., 1999, to appear in: "The Largest Explosions Since the Big Bang: Supernovae and Gamma Ray Bursts" (astro- ph/9909096) Woosley, S. E., 1993, ApJ, 405, 273 Woosley, S. E., Eastman, R. G., Weaver, T. A. & Pinto, P. A., 1994, ApJ, 429, 300 Woosley, S. E., MacFadyen, A. I. & Heger, A., 1999, to appear in: "The Largest Explosions Since the Big Bang: Supernovae and Gamma Ray Bursts" (astro-ph/9909034) Zdziarski, A. A., Svensson, R. & Paczy´nski, B., 1991, ApJ, 366, 343
astro-ph/9507027	2	9507	1995-07-10T10:57:50	Neutrino pair synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons in strong magnetic fields	[ "astro-ph" ]	The emissivity for the neutrino pair synchrotron radiation in strong magnetic fields has been calculated both analytically and numerically for high densities and moderate temperatures, as can be found in neutron stars. Under these conditions, the electrons are relativistic and degenerate. We give here our results in terms of an universal function of a single variable. For two different regimes of the electron gas we present a simplified calculation and compare our results to those of Kaminker et al. Agreement is found for the classical region, where many Landau levels contribute to the emissivity , but some differences arise in the quantum regime. One finds that the emissivity for neutrino pair synchrotron radiation is competitive, and can be dominant, with other neutrino processes for magnetic fields of the order $B \sim 10^{14} - 10^{15} G $.This indicates the relevance of this process for some astrophysical scenarios, such as neutron stars and supernovae.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Neutrino pair synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons in strong magnetic fields A. Vidaurre1, A. P´erez2, H. Sivak 4, J. Bernab´eu2,3, and J. Ma. Ib´anez2 1 Departamento de F´ısica Aplicada, Universidad Polit´ecnica de Valencia, Spain 2 Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica, Universidad de Valencia 3 IFIC, Centro Mixto Univ. Valencia-CSIC, 46100 Burjassot (Valencia), Spain 4 D.A.R.C., Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 92190 Meudon, France Received ; accepted 5 9 9 1 l u J 0 1 2 v 7 2 0 7 0 5 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a -- 2 -- ABSTRACT The emissivity for the neutrino pair synchrotron radiation in strong magnetic fields has been calculated both analytically and numerically for high densities and moderate temperatures, as can be found in neutron stars. Under these conditions, the electrons are relativistic and degenerate. We give here our results in terms of an universal function of a single variable. For two different regimes of the electron gas we present a simplified calculation and compare our results to those of Kaminker et al. Agreement is found for the classical region, where many Landau levels contribute to the emissivity , but some differences arise in the quantum regime. One finds that the emissivity for neutrino pair synchrotron radiation is competitive, and can be dominant, with other neutrino processes for magnetic fields of the order B ∼ 1014 − 1015G. This indicates the relevance of this process for some astrophysical scenarios, such as neutron stars and supernovae. Subject headings : Stars : Magnetic Fields -- Stars: Neutron. -- 3 -- 1. INTRODUCTION Estimates of the magnetic field strength at the surface of neutron stars are obtained from several different scenarios: theoretical models of pulsar emission (Ruderman 1972), the accretion flow in binary X-ray sources (Ghosh and Lamb 1978) and observation of features in the spectra of pulsating X-ray sources which have been interpreted as cyclotron lines (Trumper et al. 1978, Wheaton et al. 1979, Gruber et al. 1980, Mihara et al. 1990). For a recent review of all these topics the interested reader is addressed to the book by Michel (Michel 1991). In a sample of more than 300 pulsars the range of values of the surface magnetic field strength runs into the interval: 10.36 ≤ logB (Gauss) ≤ 13.33 (Manchester and Taylor 1981). Very recently, several authors (Duncan and Thomson 1992, Thomson and Duncan 1993, Bisnovatyi-Kogan and Mosheenko 1992, Bisnovatyi-Kogan 1993) have proposed two different physical mechanisms leading to an amplification of some initial magnetic field in a collapsing star. Fields as strong as B ∼ 1014 − 1016G, or even more, might be generated in new-born neutron stars. According to (Bisnovatyi-Kogan and Mosheenko 1992, Bisnovatyi-Kogan 1993), a mirror-asymmetric magnetic field distribution might arise in a rapidly and differentially rotating proto-neutron star having, originally, both a toroidal and a poloidal component. The field amplification due to differential rotation leads to the formation of an additional toroidal field from the poloidal one by twisting of the field lines. After the first 20 seconds of the life of a new-born neutron star (basically, its Kelvin-Helmholtz epoch) the induced toroidal magnetic field could be as huge as B ∼ 1015 − 1017G. In a second scenario (Duncan and Thomson 1992, Thomson and Duncan 1993), a dynamo action in a differentially rotating and convective young neutron star is responsible -- 4 -- for the strengthening of some initial dipole field up to values of B ∼ 1012 − 3 × 1013G if the convective episodes arose during the main-sequence stage or to B ∼ 1014 − 1015G if the dipole field is generated after collapse. In presence of a strong magnetic field the so-called neutrino-pair synchrotron radiation process becomes allowed : [e−] ~B→ [e−] + ν + ¯ν (1) This reaction has been studied by a few groups (Landstreet 1967, Canuto et al. 1970, Yakovlev and Tschaepe 1981, Vidaurre 1990, Kaminker et al. 1991, Kaminker et al. 1992, Kaminker and Yakovlev 1993) for different regimes of the electron plasma. The calculation of the corresponding emissivity, both analytically or numerically, is far from obvious. In fact, this calculation appears as a multiple integral and summation over the variables and quantum numbers involving the wave functions of the initial and final electron and the corresponding statistical weights. The wave function integrals lead to Laguerre or Bessel functions with a complicated behaviour, so that approximations in order to simplify the expressions are sometimes delicate. This in fact has lead to errors in the past literature. In a recent paper, Kaminker et al. (Kaminker et al. 1991) have studied the neutrino emissivity of the above process (1) for moderately high magnetic fields B ∼ 1012 − 1014G and high densities, in the degenerate-relativistic regime for the electrons. They claim that, within these conditions, the emissivity is independent of the electron density. So far, to our knowledge, there are no numerical tests which confirm these results. Given all these circumstances, together with the interest of the problem, both from the theoretical and astrophysical point of view, we have considered useful to reexamine the existing results for the above regime. Therefore, we have performed a numerical study of this process at high densities ρYe ≥ 107g/cm3, where Ye is the electron fraction per baryon and ρ the matter density in c.g.s. units, and moderate temperatures T < 109K, for -- 5 -- values of the magnetic field strength B ≤ 1016G. Under these conditions, the electrons are relativistic and degenerate. We have found a result which is in agreement with the one of Kaminker et al. when the electron gas is in the classical regime. We also obtain agreement for the corresponding analytical expressions, which we present in a simpler way than these authors. For the quantum regime, however, we give analytical formulae which show the correct dependence on B for large magnetic fields, in contrast to those given by Kaminker et al. This fact would be particularly important if some of the magnetic field amplification mechanisms described above were physically realizable in nature. The influence of the neutrino-pair synchrotron radiation in presence of strong magnetic fields merits to be examined in different astrophysical scenarios, such as the delayed mechanism of type II Supernovae, neutrino cooling of proto-neutron stars during the Kelvin epoch or the secular cooling of the neutron star. Furthermore, the neutrinos originated from the combined effect of one of the proposed mechanisms to enhance the magnetic field and the neutrino-pair synchrotron radiation process could be envisaged as a signature of the mechanism itself. This paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we discuss the calculation of the emissivity for the synchrotron process and present our main results. These results are illustrated with more detail in section 3 and 4 for two different regimes of the electron gas. We end in section 5 with some conclusions and remarks. 2. CALCULATION OF THE EMISSIVITY The emissivity for the process (1) can be written as -- 6 -- εν = G2eB 3(2π)6 P∞n=1Pn−1 n′=0 R +∞ −∞ dpz R~q2≤ω2 d3q ω × A f (E) [1 − f (E′)] (2) where G is the Fermi coupling constant. The initial (final) electron, of mass m, has an energy E = qm2 + p2 ⊥ + p2 z (E′ = qm2 + p′2 ⊥ + p′2 z ) characterized by the Landau quantum number n (n′) and momentum pz (p′z) along the B-direction. We have introduced = 2eBn and p′2 ⊥ p2 = 2eBn′, which correspond to the classical transverse momenta of the ⊥ electron. In the above equation, q is the four-momentum transfer and ω = E − E′ the energy which is carried away by the neutrino pair. f (E) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function : f (E) = hexp( E−µ T ) + 1i−1 integration region over ~q is restricted by : , where µ is the electron chemical potential. The q2 = ω2 − ~q2 ≥ 0. The expression for A in the equation of the emissivity can be found in (Vidaurre 1990, Kaminker et al. 1992). In the relativistic limit, the relevant expression for A is : A = (C 2 V + C 2 A) EE′ n[−2(EE′ − pzp′z)2 + (EE′ − pzp′z)(p2 + p2 t [(EE′ − pzp′z) − t − 2q2 ⊥ 1 2 t )# Ψ(u) q2 ⊥ ) − 2 (p2 t − q2 ⊥ (q2 ⊥ − p2 )(cid:21) Φ(u)(cid:27) where Ψ = n′! n! use−u[ u n′ (Ls+1 n′−1)2 + n u (Ls−1 n′ )2] (3) (4) -- 7 -- Φ = n′! n! use−u[ n n′ (Ls n′−1)2 + (Ls n′)2] (5) n1 are Laguerre functions with argument u = q2 Ln2 2eB (q⊥ is the component of ~q orthogonal to the magnetic field) and s = n − n′. CV (CA) is the effective vector (axial) coupling of the neutrino pair to the electron current, coming from both the Fierz reordered charged current ⊥ (for electron neutrinos) and neutral current (for all neutrino species) weak interactions. In Eq. (4) we have dropped a term proportional to (C 2 V − C 2 A), which disappears in the extreme relativistic limit, and the interference term proportional to CV CA, which does not contribute to the integrated emissivity in Eq. (2). The argument goes as follows. The corresponding integrand, for CV CA, is odd under the simultaneous change of sign of the longitudinal momenta of the initial and final electrons, so that a symmetric integration of both pz and qz in Eq.(2) cancels this asymmetric term. We have defined p2 t = p2 ⊥ + p′2 ⊥ . If one takes for the electroweak mixing angle sin2θW = 0.23, then C 2 V + C 2 A = 1.6748. One has the relationship ω2 − q2 z = 2m2 + p2 t − 2(EE′ − pzp′z) ≈ p2 t − 2(EE′ − pzp′z) (6) where the latter approximation corresponds to considering relativistic electrons. By substituting in Eq. (4) we obtain A = (C 2 V + C 2 A) 2EE′ (ω2 − q2 z − q2 ⊥ )[p2 t (Ψ − Φ) − (ω2 − q2 z − q2 ⊥ )Ψ] (7) As mentioned above, for the range of temperatures and densities we are interested in, the electrons are degenerate. The product of distribution functions appearing in (2) will then restrict the energies to E, E′ ∼ µ. Moreover, one can write the following identity : -- 8 -- f (E) [1 − f (E′)] = B(ω) [f (E′) − f (E)] (8) where B(ω) = [exp(ω/T ) − 1]−1 is a Bose-Einstein distribution function with zero chemical potential. From the last equation, it is apparent that the energy difference ω will be restricted to a few times T and will be much lower than the relevant values of E and E′, if the electrons are degenerate. Similarly, one can easily estimate that qz and q⊥ will contribute as ∼ T , whereas pt, pz and p′z contribute as ∼ µ. This allows us to neglect the last term in Eq. (7). In this case one gets A = (C 2 V + C 2 A) 2EE′ p2 t (ω2 − q2 z − q2 ⊥ )Θ (9) with Θ = Ψ − Φ. We have tested numerically that the complete expression Eq.(4) or Eq.(7) gives approximately the same result as Eq.(9) for the physical conditions we are considering here. We can also perform the following approximations, in agreement with the above discussion : n + n′ = ω = = p2 t 2eB 2seB + p2 E + E′ (E + E′)2 + ω2 − 2(p2 z − p′2 4eB 2seB + 2pzqz z z + p′2 z ) ≈ E + E′ (E + E′)2 − 4p2 z 4eB ≈ (10) Due to the Pauli principle, the quantity f (E)[1 − f (E′)] will be nonzero only when E and E′ are within a narrow interval around µ of width ω ∼ T . With this in mind, we have replaced all the slowly varying functions in (2) by their value around E, E′ ∼ µ. The latter equation, together with the phase space restriction (3), requires that qz and q⊥ must lie inside the elliptical domain (Kaminker et al. 1991) -- 9 -- + q2 ⊥ p2 µ2 (qz − χz)2 ≤ χ2 ⊥ ⊥ (11) and χ⊥ = seB p⊥ . where χz = seBpz p2 ⊥ We have numerically calculated the emissivity of the synchrotron process (1) for values of the electron density ρYe ≥ 107g/cm3, moderate temperatures T < 109K, and magnetic fields B ≤ 1016G. The results, for this range of values, can be expressed in a compact way as : εν = 1.47 1014 B2 13 T 5 9 f (x) erg/cm3/s (12) where B13 is the magnetic field in units of 1013G, T9 is the temperature in units of 109K, and x = µT eB is a dimensionless variable. This result is useful in order to perform analytical calculations. We have plotted in Fig. 1 the function f (x). As can be seen from this figure, f (x) first increases as x grows, and is almost constant for large values of x. This behaviour corresponds to different physical regimes of the electron plasma, and will be explained in the next sections. 3. Large x Regime Let us discuss the behaviour of the emissivity corresponding to large values of the parameter x defined above. This situation corresponds, for example, to sufficiently high electron densities for a fixed magnetic field and temperature. The number of Landau levels 2eB . On the other hand, the maximum of s = n− n′ which are involved in Eq. (2) is nmax = µ2 can be estimated from Eq. (10) as smax ∼ µT eB = x. We then have nmax >> smax >> 1 -- 10 -- for µ T >> 1. According to this idea, we have used the following approximations for the Laguerre polynomials in Eq. (5) : s−1 + J 2 s+1 Ψ → J 2 Φ → 2J 2 s (13) with Js(a) a Bessel function and a = q2(n + n′)u. One can prove that a ≤ s always. The approximation shown by Eq. (13) can be used if n >> 1 and s << n. Because it is time saving and more suitable numerically than Eq. (5), we made use of it in our numerical computation of the emissivity, whenever large values of n (and s << n) were encountered. By changing the sum over n and n′ to a sum over n′ and s, and integrating the angle of ~q around the ~B direction, one arrives to the following expression : εν = G2eB 3(2π)5 (C 2 × (1 − p2 V + C 2 µ2 )(ω2 − q2 A) P∞n′=0P∞s=1 R +∞ −∞ dpz Rq2≤ω2 dqzdq⊥q⊥ ω ) B(ω) [f (E′) − f (E)] Θ(a) z − q2 ⊥ z (14) The argument of Θ can be written as a = p⊥q⊥/(eB), with p⊥ = qµ2 − p2 z, and ω = seB+pzqz . µ Further approximations can be made in the above equation for degenerate electrons, if one considers the distribution functions f (E) and f (E′) as step functions in the energy. Within this assumption, the sum over n′ can be done explicitly. One gets ∞ Xn′=0 [f (E′) − f (E)] = ω 2eB (E + E′) ≃ µω eB (15) In deriving Eq.(15), we have used the fact that s is lower than nmax. By inserting the latter expression into Eq. (14) we obtain -- 11 -- εν = G2µ 3(2π)5 (C 2 V + C 2 × (1 − p2 A) P∞s=1 R +∞ dpz Rq2≤ω2 dqzdq⊥q⊥ ω2 −∞ z − q2 µ2 )(ω2 − q2 ⊥ ) B(ω)Θ(a) z (16) Next we make use of recurrence relationships for the Bessel functions and obtain the formula : Θ(a) = 2(J′s)2 + 2(s2/a2 − 1)J 2 s (17) For the large values of s involved here, one can use the following approximation to the Bessel functions (Gradshteyn and Ryzhik 1980): Js(a) ≈ 1 πs 2(s − a) 3a K1/3(z) (18) where z = [2(s−a)]3/2 3√x approximated as : and K1/3 is the modified Bessel function, which can be further K1/3(z) ≈ r π 2z exp (−z) In this way one obtains, after some algebra, Θ(a) ≈ 2 π s−4/3(2z)1/3 exp (−2z) (19) (20) As can be seen from Fig. 2, the latter equation provides a reasonable approximation to Eq.(17). In this figure, we have plotted Θ(a) as obtained from Eq.(20) (dotted line) and from Eq.(17) (solid line) for s = 200. Another important feature is that only values of the -- 12 -- argument a close to s will contribute. This can be understood from Eq.(20), due to the exponential behaviour, which effectively limits z. In fact, if we define σ as the 'width' of the exponential, one has (1 − a/s) < ( σ important values of qz and q⊥ are restricted to s )2/3. By substituting into Eq.(11) one obtains that σ s q⊥ χ⊥ )2/3 ) ≤ ( (1 − qz − χz ≤ ∆(q⊥) ≤ √2 µχz pz ( σ s )1/3 (21) We have defined ∆(q⊥) = µχ⊥ . Thus qz is restricted to a narrow interval of p⊥ r1 − q2 χ2 ⊥ ⊥ width ∆(q⊥) around χz. This allows us to perform the integral over qz approximately. To the first order in ∆(q⊥) one can write Z χz+∆(q⊥) χz−∆(q⊥) dqz −→ 2∆(q⊥) (22) with the replacement qz → χz in the integrand of Eq. (16). This means that ω2 will be . The integral over q⊥ is then immediate. Since the total number of level differences s is large, one can substitute the sum over s by an integral over the continuous replaced by χ2 z + χ2 ⊥ variable t = s/x. Thus by changing Ps −→ xR ∞0 dt and performing the remaining integrals one finally obtains εν = G2 π6 (C 2 V + C 2 A)ζ(5)(eB)2T 5 = 1.16 1015 B13 T 5 9 erg/cm3/s (23) This equation implies that the emissivity does not depend on the electron density in this regime, in agreement with the result previously found in Ref. (Kaminker et al. 1991). In fact, our Eq. (23) is close to the one obtained in this reference. It is also in good -- 13 -- agreement with the values of f (x) obtained numerically (and plotted in Fig. 1), as can be seen by comparing Eq.(23) with Eq.(12). A numerical fit which reproduces the behaviour of f (x) for x > 2 to better than 4% is given by f (x) = −5.0224 − 8.1289x + 9.2892x2 1.0293 + 2.0605x + 1.0727x2 (24) 4. Low x Regime We now address the question of whether an increase of the magnetic field will always give a larger neutrino emission. In Fig. 3 we present the corresponding emissivity (in cgs units and logarithmic scale) for a fixed temperature T9 = 1 and four values of the electron density ρYe = 109, 1011, 1013, 1014g/cm3, as a function of B13 (B13 ranging from unity up to 103), as obtained numerically. For these high magnetic fields, the number of populated Landau levels (nmax, defined above) can be of order unity, and we enter into the quantum regime. We have used, in these cases, the expression of A as given by Eqs. (4) and (5) directly, instead of making the approximations shown in section 3. As can be seen from Fig. 3, for a given density and temperature, the emissivity first increases and, after reaching a maximum value, will fall to zero for large values of the magnetic field. This can be understood since the number of possible n → n′ transitions decreases as eB µT ≫ 1. In fact, a rough analytic expression in this region can be obtained by putting s = 1 in Eq. (14) and ω = eB µ . Therefore one has : Ψ ≃ 1 Φ ≃ 0 (25) -- 14 -- The integrals in Eq. (14) can be done analytically and one obtains the following expression : εν = 6.6 1012 B2 13 T 5 9 x−5e−1/x erg/cm3/s (26) We have verified that the latter expression gives values which are in agreement with our numerical results around the maximum of the emissivity. This is shown in Fig. 4, where we have compared our results for ρYe = 1011g/cm3 (solid line) with the prediction of Eq. (26) (dotted line). We have also plotted (dashed line) the corresponding analytical approximation given by (Kaminker et al. 1991) for this case. As can be seen from this figure, Eq. (26) provides a reasonable approximation to the emissivity, which works better than the formula of Kaminker et al. 5. Comparison with other processes In order to investigate the relevance of the process studied here for neutron star cooling, we have made the comparison with the emissivities corresponding to other neutrino processes which are competitive with the synchrotron emission. We have considered pair production e+e− −→ ν ¯ν ,plasmon decay Γ −→ ν ¯ν, bremmstrahlung e−(Z, A) −→ e−(Z, A)ν ¯ν and photoproduction γe− −→ e−ν ¯ν. For these processes, we have made the assumption that they do not vary significantly with the magnetic field. The numerical fit to these emissivities have been taken from Munakata et al. 1985. Although these rather simple formulae are not the most up-to-date available fits to the above processes, they serve to our purpose as a first approximation (see, for example, Itoh et al. 1989, for a more elaborated fit). The bremmstrahlung process is taken from Maxwell 1979. A more complete calculation, as in -- 15 -- Itoh et al. (Itoh et al. 1989), gives the same order of magnitude in the region where this process dominates. In Fig. 5 we present the result of comparing all these processes for a temperature T = 108K as the product ρYe varies from zero up to 1012g/cm3. The bremmstrahlung energy emission was calculated assuming that the dominant nucleus is 56F e. The synchrotron emissivity is plotted (solid lines) for two values of the magnetic field : B13 = 10 and B13 = 100. Other relevant processes are : bremmstrahlung (dashed-dotted line), plasma (long dash), and photoneutrino emission (short dash). As can be seen from this figure, the synchrotron emission is competitive with the above processes within the range ρYe ∼ 109 − 1012. Moreover, as pointed out by Pethick and Thorsson (Pethick and Thorsson 1993), band-structure effects can suppress bremmstrahlung by a factor of 10 or more for temperatures less than about 109K. In this case, the synchrotron emission would be the dominant process in the above electron density range, if the magnetic field reaches values of the order ∼ 1014G. For higher temperatures, the synchrotron emission corresponding to a given value of B 'switches on' at lower electron densities, as can be inferred from Eq. (26). However, other processes have a faster increase with temperature and, therefore, the dominance of synchrotron emission reduces to a narrow interval of densities, although it effectively competes for high densities. This is shown in Fig. 6, where we have made the above comparison for a temperature T = 109K (pair emission is represented by the dotted line). 6. CONCLUSIONS We have performed numerical calculations of the synchrotron emissivity from relativistic degenerate electrons. This calculations allow us to present the results in terms -- 16 -- of an universal function f (x) which can be used in astrophysical codes. For two different regimes of the electron gas we have derived analytical formulae, in a simpler way than previous references. These formulae have been tested, and we have found a reasonable agreement with our numerical calculations. We also have compared our results to the analytical formulae derived recently by Kaminker et al. Agreement is found for the classical region, where many Landau levels contribute to the emissivity , but some differences arise in the quantum regime, for the values of the magnetic field recently suggested in new-born neutron stars. We have shown that neutrino-pair synchrotron radiation for moderately high magnetic fields B ≥ 1014G is an efficient cooling mechanism for temperatures not larger than 109K, and can compete effectively (or even dominate) with other processes. We claim that the influence of the neutrino-pair synchrotron radiation in presence of strong magnetic fields (∼ 1015G) merits to be examined in different astrophysical scenarios, such as the delayed mechanism of type II Supernovae, neutrino cooling of proto-neutron stars during the Kelvin epoch or the secular cooling of the neutron star. Furthermore, these neutrinos originated from the combined effect of the dynamo action with the neutrino-pair synchrotron radiation process could be envisaged as a signature of this mechanism. This will be the subject of future investigations. Acknowledgments This work has been partially supported by the Spanish DGICYT (grant PB91-0648) and CICYT (grant AEN 93-0234). Calculations were carried out in a VAX 6000/410 at the Instituto de F´ısica Corpuscular and in a IBM 30-9021 VF at the Centre de Inform`atica de la Universitat de Val`encia. We are grateful to J.A. Miralles for useful comments. -- 17 -- REFERENCES Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S., Mosheenko, I., 1992, Sov. Astron., 36, 285. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S., 1993, Astron. Astrophys. Transactions, 3, 287. Canuto, V., Chiu, H.Y., Chou, C.K., 1970, Phys. Rev., D2, 281. Duncan, R.C., Thompson, C., 1992, Ap. J., 392, L9. Ghosh, P., and Lamb, F.K., 1978, Ap. J. Letters, 223, L83. Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M., "Table of Integrals, Series and Products". Academic Press, 1980. Gruber, D.E., Matteson, J.L., Nolan, P.L., Knight, F.K., Baity, W.A., Rotschild, R.E., Peterson, L.E., Hoffman, J.A., Scheepmaker, A., Wheaton, W.A., Primini, F.A., Levine, A.M., Lewin, W.H.G., 1980, Ap. J. Letters, 240, L127. Itoh, N., Adachi, T., Nakagawa, M., Kohyama, Y., Munakata, H., 1989, Ap. J., 339, 354. see also Haft, M., Raffelt, G., 1993, Max-Planck Institut fur Astrophysik preprint. Schinder, J., Schramm, D.N., Wiita, P.J., Margolis, S.H., Tubbs, D.L. 1987, Ap. J., 313, 531. Kaminker, A.D., Levenfish, K.P., Yakovlev, D.G., 1991, Sov. Astron. Lett., 17, 450. Kaminker, A.D., Levenfish, K.P., Yakovlev, D.G., Amsterdamski, P., Haensel, P., 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 3256. Kaminker, A.D., Yakovlev, D.G., 1993, JETP, 76, 229. Landstreet, J.D., 1967, Phys. Rev., 153, 1372. -- 18 -- Manchester, R.N., Taylor, J.H., 1981, Astron. J., 86, 1953. Maxwell, O.V., 1979, Ap. J., 231, 201. Michel, F.C., Theory of Neutron Star Magnetospheres, University of Chicago Press (1991). Mihara, T., Makishima, K., Ohashi, T., Sakao, T., Tashiro, M., Nagase, F., Tanaka, Y., Kitamoto, S., Miyamoto, S., Deeter, J.E., Boynton, P.E., 1990, Nature, 346, 250. Munakata, H., Kohyama, Y., Itoh, N., 1985, Ap. J., 296, 197 Pethick, C.J., Thorsson, V., Nordita preprint 93/72 A/S/N. Ruderman, M.A., 1972, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 10, 427. Thompson, C., Duncan, R.C., 1993, Ap. J., 408, 194. Trumper, J., Pietsch, W., Reppin, C., and Voges, W., 1978, Ap. J. Letters, 219, L105. Vidaurre, A., Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Valencia (1990). Wheaton, W.A., Doty, J.P., Primini, F.A., Cooke, B.A., Dobson, C.A., Goldman, A., Hecht, M., Hoffman, J.A., Home, S.K., Scheepmaker, A., Tsiang, E.Y., Lewin, W.H.G., Matteson, J.L., Gruber, D.E., Baity, W.A., Rotschild, R., Knight, F.K., Nolan, P., Peterson, L.E., 1979, Nature, 272, 240. D.G. Yakovlev and R. Tschaepe, 1981, Astron. Nachr. 302, 167. This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v3.0. -- 19 -- Figure Captions Figure 1.- The function f (x) appearing in Eq. (12). See the text for the definition of the dimensionless variable x and comments about its behaviour. Figure 2.- The function Θ(a) as obtained from the approximation Eq.(20) (dotted line) compared to Eq.(17) (solid line) for s = 200. Figure 3.- Neutrino synchrotron emissivity as a function of the magnetic field B13 for different values of the electron density. The temperature is the same (T = 109K) in all cases. Figure 4.- Comparison of our numerical results for ρYe = 1011g/cm3 (solid line) with the analytical approximation Eq. (26) (dotted line). We have also plotted (dashed line) the approximation given by (Kaminker et al. 1991) for this case. Figure 5.- Competition of synchrotron neutrino emission (solid lines) with other processes, as a function of the electron density, for a temperature T = 108K. Two different values of the magnetic field (B13 = 10 and B13 = 100 have been considered. The bremmstrahlung emissivity (dash-dotted line) has been calculated for 56F e. Plasma process is represented by long-dashed line, and photoneutrino by short-dashed line. Figure 6.- Same as figure 5 for T = 109K. Dotted line corresponds to pair emission.
astro-ph/9704110	1	9704	1997-04-12T03:18:13	A New Model for Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters	[ "astro-ph" ]	We consider a model in which the soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) result from young, magnetized strange stars with superconducting cores. As such a strange star spins down, the quantized vortex lines move outward and drag the magnetic field tubes because of the strong coupling between them. Since the terminations of the tubes interact with the stellar crust, the dragged tubes can produce sufficient tension to crack the crust. Part of the broken platelet will be dragged into the quark core, which is only $10^4$ cm from the surface, leading to the deconfinement of crustal matter into strange quark matter and thus the release of energy. We will show that the burst energy, duration, time interval and spectrum for our model are in agreement with the observational results. The persistent X-ray emission from the SGRs can be well explained by our model.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A New Model for Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters K.S. Cheng1 and Z.G. Dai2 1Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 2Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China We consider a model in which the soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) result from young, magnetized strange stars with superconducting cores. As such a strange star spins down, the quantized vortex lines move outward and drag the magnetic field tubes because of the strong coupling between them. Since the terminations of the tubes interact with the stellar crust, the dragged tubes can produce sufficient tension to crack the crust. Part of the broken platelet will be dragged into the quark core, which is only 104 cm from the surface, leading to the deconfinement of crustal matter into strange quark matter and thus the release of energy. We will show that the burst energy, duration, time interval and spectrum for our model are in agreement with the observational results. The persistent X-ray emission from the SGRs can be well explained by our model. PACS numbers: 98.70.Rz., 12.38.Mh, 26.60.+c, 97.60Jd The soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are a small, enigmatic class of gamma-ray transient sources. There are three known SGRs which are charaterized by short rise times (as short as 5 ms) and duration (∼ 50-150 ms, FWHM, some less than 16 ms), spectra with character- istic energies of ∼ 30-50 keV and little or no evolution, and stochastic burst repetition within a timescale of ∼ 1 month [1]. SGR 0525−66, the source of the 1979 March 5 event, appears to be associated with the N49 supernova remnant (SNR) in the Large Magellanic Cloud and hence is apparently the most distant known SGR source at ∼ 55 kpc from Earth [2]. The second burster, SGR 1806−20, which produced ∼ 110 observed bursts during a 7-year span [3] and recently became active again [4], appears to be coincident with the SNR G10.0−0.3 [5], confirming an earlier suggestion [6]. Thus, this source is at a dis- tance of ∼ 15 kpc. The third burster, SGR 1900+14, is associated with SNR G42.8+0.6 [7], and its age is ∼ 104 yrs and its distance from Earth is ∼ 7 kpc. Accept- ing these SGR-SNR associations, the burst peak lumi- nosities can be estimated to be a few orders higher than the standard Eddington value for a star with the mass of ∼ 1M⊙. For example, SGR 1806−20 has produced events that are ∼ 104 times the Eddington luminosity [8]. In addition to short bursts of both hard X-rays and soft γ-rays, the persistent X-ray emission was also detected from SGRs [5,7,9]. The luminosities of the persistent X-ray sources are ∼ 7 × 1035 ergs s−1 for SGR 0525−66, ∼ 3×1035 ergs s−1 for SGR 1806−20, and ∼ 1035 ergs s−1 for SGR 1900+14. These observations show that the re- peaters may be young, magnetized neutron stars which power the surrounding luminous plerionic nebulae. There may be three classes of models for explaining the energy source of SGRs. In the first class of models, SGRs were thought to result from accretion of neutron stars (for a brief review see [10]). Since the highly super-Eddington flux requires the accretion inflow and radiation outflow to be channeled in different directions so that it makes any accretion model very difficult. Second, it was sug- gested [11] that glitches of normal pulsars are an energy source of SGRs. However, the current models for pulsar glitches [12,13] seem to give glitching intervals and dura- tions much larger than those of SGRs. Moreover, no SGR bursts have so far been detected from the Crab pulsar. These two facts may disfavor the glitch model for SGRs. Third, it was argued [14] that SGRs are magnetars, a kind of neutron stars with superstrong magnetic fields of ≥ 5 × 1014 G. Although the motivations for this model (e.g., rapid spin-down to 8 s period in 104 years) sound attractive, there may be several unsettled issues [10], e.g., (i) a power output from such a strong magnetic field may be inconsistent with the plerion energy range; (ii) in such a strong field the radiation output is highly anisotropic but the observed shape seems to be angle independent. In this letter we suggest that SGRs result from young, magnetized strange stars with superconducting cores. The structure of strange stars has been studied [15]. Strange stars near 1.4M⊙ have thin crusts with thickness of ∼ 104 cm and mass of ∼ 10−5M⊙. Some arguments may be unfavorable to the existence of strange stars. First, most important, the relaxation behavior of glitches of pulsars which seem to be isolated neutron stars with masses of ∼ 1.4M⊙ is well described by the neutron su- perfluid vortex creep theory [12], but the current strange 1 star models scarely explain the observed pulsar glitches [16]. This may also mean that at least pulsars in which glitches occur must be neutron stars, not strange stars. Second, the conversion of a neutron star to a strange star requires the formation of a strange matter seed at a den- sity (6-9 times the nuclear matter density) much larger than the central denisty of the 1.4M⊙ star with a rather stiff equation of state [17]. This shows that strange stars are not easy to be produced in the universe. However, it was argued [18] that when neutron stars in low-mass X-ray binaries accrete sufficient mass, they may convert to strange stars. This mechanism was further suggested as a possible origin of cosmological gamma-ray bursts. In this Letter we suggest that strange stars may also be formed during the core collapse of massive stars or during the accretion phase of newly born neutron stars. The birth rate of strange stars due to these processes must be low. This is beacuse (i) if the rate were high, the number of resulting strange stars would be too high to explain the observed glitch phenomena; (ii) although the current type II supervova models believe that neutron stars can be produced during the core collapse of massive stars in some controversial mass range and the evolution of more massive stars can result in the formation of black holes, these models have neither given the upper limit of the masses of massive stars which evolve to neutron stars nor the lower limit of the masses of massive stars which evolve to black holes. We conjecture that massive stars in a narrow mass range may finally evolve to strange stars. There are two cases for this evolution: (i) dur- ing the core collapse the nucleon matter directly convert into strange matter [19], in which case the shock wave for the supernova can obtain more energy; (ii) the cen- tral density of a newly born neutron star may reach the deconfinement density due to hypercritical accretion in a supernova circumstance [20] and then the whole neutron star may undergo a phase transition to a strange star. After the birth, a strange star must start to cool due to neutrino emission. As a neutron star does, the strange star core may become superconducting when its interior temperature is below the critical temperature. Using a relativistic treatment of BCS theory, Bailin & Love [21] suggested that strange matter forms superconducting. They showed that the pairing of quarks is most likely to occur in both ud and ss channels. The pairing state of the former is likely in s-wave and that of the latter is in p-wave. The superconducting transition temperature is about 400 keV. Therefore, a strange star with age older than 103 years after its supernova birth should have a core temperature lower than the normal-superconducting temperature [22]. The quark superconductor is likely to be marginally type II with zero temperature critical field Bc ∼ 1016-1017 G [21,23] which sensitively depends on the interactions between quarks. On the other hand, the existence of quantized vortex lines in the rotating core of a strange star is unclear. Since different superconducting species inside a rotating strange star try to set up different values of London fields in order to compensate for the effect of rotation. Using the Ginzburg-Landau formulism, Chau [23] showed that instead of setting a global London field vortex bundles carrying localized magnetic fields can be formed. The typical field inside the vortex core is about 1016-1017 G (the accurate value depends on strong interaction param- eters). Using the similar idea proposed for the interaction between the proton fluxoids and magnetic neutron vor- tics in the core of a neutron star [24], he argued that the vortex bundle and the flux tubes can interpin to each other by interaction of their core magnetic fields. He estimated that the pinning energy per intersection is Ep ∼ 690N 1/2 flux MeV , (1) where Nflux is the number of flux quantum in a flux tube. Such strong binding between vortex lines and flux tubes implies that when the vortex lines moving outward due to spinning-down of the star will induce the decay of the magnetic field [23]. One of the important consequences of this coupling effect will be discussed next text. We now propose a plate tectonic model for strange stars which is, in principle, similar to that proposed by Ruderman [24] for neutron stars. As described in last subsection, there might exist two different types of quan- tized flux tubes in the core of a strange star. The first type of flux tubes are formed when the stellar magnetic field penetrates through the superconducting core. The second type of flux tubes (vortex lines) result from the requirement of minimizing the rotating energy of the core superfluid. When the star spin down due to mag- netic dipole radiation, the vortex lines move outward and pull the flux tubes with them. Inductive currents do not strongly oppose this flux tube motion because of current screening by the almost perfectly diamagnetic superconducting quarks. However, the terminations of flux tubes are anchored in the base of highly conduct- 2 ing crystalline stellar crust. When the stellar spin-down timescale τs = Ω/2 Ω is shorter than the typical ohmic diffuse timescale, τD ∼ σA 4πc2 ∼ 3 × 104σ21R2 6 yrs , (2) where σ is the conductivity and R6 is the radius in units of 106 cm. The motion of flux tubes is limited by their terminations in the crust unless the resulting pull on the crust by these flux tubes exceeds the crustal yield strength, namely, BBc 8π sin θ > µθs l R , (3) where B is the stellar magnetic field, θ is the angle bew- teen the stellar magnetic moment and the flux tubes, µ is the shear modulus, θs is the shear angle, and l is the crustal thickness. Substituting the typical values of strange star parameters into equation (3), we obtain sin θ ∼ θ > θc ≡ 3 × 10−6B−1 c,17B−1 12 θs,−3µ27l4R−1 6 rad , (4) where Bc,17 is in 1017 G, B in 1012 G, θs,−3 in 10−3, µ27 in 1027 dyn cm−2, and l4 in 104 cm. When θ > θc, the stel- lar crust will crack and θ will be reduced by an amount δθ ∼ min(θ, ∆l/R) (∆l is the displacement of the crustal plate). In the case of neutron stars, Ruderman [25] esti- mated that ∆l ∼ 2×102 cm for the Crab and Vela pulsars. For a strange star with a much thinner crust than that of a neutron star, we expect that l > ∆l > 2 × 102 cm, which implies δθ ∼ θ. Since the flux tubes move outward with the same speed as the vortex lines which is given by v ∼ R τs = 3 × 10−6R6τ −1 s,4 cm s−1 , (5) where τs,4 is in 104 yrs, the time interval between two successive cracking events is estimated to be τint ∼ Rδθ v ∼ 106 B−1 c,17B−1 12 θs,−3µ27l4R−1 6 τs,4 s . (6) This value is consistent with the typical interval timescale of SGRs. When the crust cracks, a small platelet could be dragged from the crust into the strange matter core which is only 104 cm from the surface. In the following we make an estimate of the timescale for the platelet motion. The force pulling the craking platelet horizontally by the flux tubes is Fp = BBc 8π θAp , (7) where Ap is the area of the platelet. Thus, the timescale opening a hole with area ∼ Ap is approximated by τdrag =(cid:18)2l ApMcr 4πR2 1 Fp(cid:19)1/2 ∼ 80(cid:18) Mcr,−5 θs,−3µ27R6(cid:19)1/2 ms , (8) where Mcr,−5 is the total mass of the crust in units of 10−5M⊙. The durations of the SGRs are expected to be of the same order as this timescale. As normal matter falls into the core continuously, the baryons will deconfine into quarks. Because each baryon can release ∼ (20 − 30) MeV (the accurate value is dependent upon the QCD parameters), which are a sum of gravitational energy and deconfinement energy, the total amount of energy release is estimated as ∆E ∼ 3 × 1042Mcr,−5(Ap/l2)l2 4R−2 6 ergs . (9) where Mcr,−5 is the total mass of the crust in units of 10−5M⊙. At least half of this amount will be car- ried away by thermal photons with the typical energy kT ∼ 30 MeV. These thermal photons will be released continuously in a timescale of ∼ τdrag. In the presence of a strong magnetic field, the thermal photons will convert into electron-positron pairs when Eγ 2mc2 B Bq sin Φ ∼ 1 15 , (10) where Eγ is the photon energy, Bq = m2c3/¯he = 4.4 × 1013 G and Φ is the angle between the photon propaga- tion direction and the direction of the magnetic field [27]. The energies of the resulting pairs will be lost via syn- chrotron radiation. The characteristic synchrotron en- ergy is given by E(1) syn ∼ 3 2 γ2 e ¯h eB mc sin Φ ∼ 1.5 MeV , (11) where γe is the Lorentz factor of the electron (∼ 30). The first generation of synchrotron photons will be con- verted into the secondary pairs because the optical depth of photon-photon pair production is much large than 1. The characteristic synchrotron energy of the secondary pairs is given by 3 2mc2!2 2 E(1) syn ¯h(cid:18) eB mc(cid:19) ∼ 37B12 keV . (12) E(2) syn ∼ 3 Foundation of China. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- [1] J.P. Norris, P. Hertz, K.S. Wood, and C. Kouve- liotou, Astrophys. J. 366, 240 (1991). [2] W.D. Evans et al., Astrophys. J. 237, L7 (1980); T.L. Cline et al., ibid. 255, L45 (1982). [3] J.G. Laros et al., Astrophys. J. 320, L111 (1987). [4] C. Kouveliotou et al., Nature (London) 368, 125 (1994). [5] T. Murakami et al., Nature (London) 368, 127 (1994). [6] S.R. Kulkarni, and D.A. Frail, Nature (London) 365, 33 (1993). [7] G. Vasisht, S.R. Kulkarni, D.A. Frail, and J. Greiner, Astrophys. J. 431, L35 (1994). [8] E.E. Fenimore, J.G. Laros, and A. Ulmer, Astrophys. J. 432, 742 (1994). [9] R.E. Rothschild, S.R. Kulkarni, and R.E. Ligenfelter, Nature (London) 368, 432 (1994). [10] E.P. Liang, Astrophys. Space Sci. 231, 69 (1995). [11] F. Melia, and M. Fatuzzo, Astrophys. J. 438, 904 (1995); M. Fatuzzo, and F. Melia, ibid. 464, 316 (1996). [12] D. Pines, and M.A. Alpar, Nature (London) 316, 27 (1985). [13] B. Link, and R.I. Epstein, Astrophys. J. 457, 844 [14] R.C. Duncan, and C. Thompson, Astrophys. J. 392, L9 (1992); C. Thompson, and R.C. Duncan, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 275, 255 (1995). [15] C. Alcock, E. Farhi, and A. Olinto, Astrophys. J. 310, 261 (1986); P. Haensel, J.L. Zdunik, and R. Schaeffer, Astron. Astrophys. 160, 121 (1986). [16] M.A. Alpar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2152 (1987). [17] G. Baym, in Neutron Stars: Theory and Observa- tions eds. J. Ventura and D. Pines (Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers), 21 (1991). Lx ∼ ξ∆E τint ∼ 3 × 1036 ξMcr,−5(Ap/l2)l4R−1 6 ×Bc,17B12θ−1 s,−3µ−1 27 τ −1 s,4 ergs s−1 , (1996). (13) Since the optical depth of photon-electron scattering near the star is also much larger than 1, a radiation-pair fire- ball in thermal equilibrium will have an initial temper- ature of the same order as E(2) syn, and will expand adi- abatically as a fluid. During the expansion the radia- tion energy is converted into a bulk kinetic energy of the outflow. The fireball will cool with T = T0(R0/R), and the relativistic Lorentz factor Γ of the bulk motion is Γ = T0/T = R/R0 [28]. Therefore, when the optical depth of the fireball is one, an observer at infinity will see a blueshifted spectrum with the typical energy of ∼ E(2) syn due to the relativistic bulk motion of the fireball. Finally, we want to discuss an astrophysical implica- tion of our model. The persistent X-ray emission from the SGRs was detected. If the sources are normal neu- tron stars with typical magnetic fields of ∼ 1012 G, it is obvious that the persistent X-ray luminosities from the SGRs may not be explained by the surface blackbody radiation. This is because calculations for the cooling of neutron stars [29] predict that after (0.5 −1) ×104 yrs the bolometric luminosities will be at least two orders smaller than the persistent X-ray ones from the SGRs. Recently Usov [30] suggested that if the sources of the SGRs are magnetars the persistent X-ray emission may be the ther- mal radiation of these stars which is enhanced by a factor of 10 or more due to the effect of ultrastrong magnetic fields. We can also explain the observed persistent X- ray emission by using our model. After each cracking event, at least half of the resulting thermal energy from the deconfinement of normal matter into strange quark matter will be absorbed by the stellar core and thus the surface radiation luminosity at thermal equilibrium may be estimated to be where ξ is a parameter which accounts for both the ratio of the absorbed thermal energy to the released total en- ergy during a cracking event and the ratio of the surface blackbody radiation energy to the absorbed thermal en- ergy. We expect that this parameter is of the order of 0.5. Taking B−1 12 θs,−3µ27 ∼ 3 to account for τint ∼ 3×106 s, we have Lx ∼ 5 × 1035 erg s−1. This estimated lumi- nosity seems to agree with the observed ones from the SGRs. c,17B−1 This work was supported in part by a RGC grant of Hong Kong and in part by the National Natural Science 4 [18] K.S. Cheng, and Z.G. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1210 (1996). [19] N.A. Gentile et al., Astrophys. J. 414, 701 (1993); Z.G. Dai, Q.H. Peng, and T. Lu, ibid. 440, 815 (1995). [20] R.A. Chevalier, Astrophys. J. 346, 847 (1989); G.E. Brown, ibid. 440, 270 (1995). [21] B. Bailin, and A. Love, Phys. Rep. 107, 325 (1984). [22] O.G. Benvenuto, H. Vucetich, and J.E. Horvath, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) B24, 160 (1991). [23] H.F. Chau, Astrophys. J., in press (1997). [24] H.F. Chau, K.S. Cheng, and K.Y. Ding, Astrophys. J. 399, 213 (1992). [25] M.A. Ruderman, Astrophys. J. 366, 261 (1991). [26] M.A. Ruderman, preprint (1996). [27] M.A. Ruderman, and P.G. Sutherland, Astrophys. J. 196, 51 (1975). [28] J. Goodman, Astrophys. J. 308, L47 (1986); A. Shemi, and T. Piran, ibid. 365, L55 (1990). [29] K. Nomoto, and S. Tsuruta, Astrophys. J. 312, 711 (1987). [30] V.V. Usov, Astron. Astrophys. 317, L87 (1997). 5
0803.1893	1	0803	2008-03-13T03:58:16	Physical Properties of Tidal Features in Interacting Disk Galaxies	[ "astro-ph" ]	We explore tidal interactions of a galactic disk with Toomre parameter Q ~ 2 embedded in rigid halo/bulge with a point mass companion moving in a prescribed parabolic orbit. Tidal interactions produce well-defined spiral arms and extended tidal features such as bridge and tail that are all transient, but distinct in nature. In the extended disks, strong tidal force is able to lock the perturbed epicycle phases of the near-side particles to the perturber, shaping them into a tidal bridge that corotates with the perturber. A tidal tail develops at the opposite side as strongly-perturbed, near-side particles overtake mildly-perturbed, far-side particles. The tail is essentially a narrow material arm with a roughly logarithmic shape, dissolving with time because of large velocity dispersions. Inside the disks where tidal force is relatively weak, on the other hand, a two-armed logarithmic spiral pattern emerges due to the kinematic alignment of perturbed particle orbits. While self-gravity makes the spiral arms a bit stronger, the arms never become fully self-gravitating, wind up progressively with time, and decay after the peak almost exponentially in a time scale of ~ 1 Gyr. The arm pattern speed varying with both radius and time converges to Omega-kappa/2 at late time, suggesting that the pattern speed of tidally-driven arms may depend on radius in real galaxies. We present the parametric dependences of various properties of tidal features on the tidal strength, and discuss our findings in application to tidal spiral arms in grand-design spiral galaxies. (Abridged)	astro-ph	astro-ph	Accepted for publication in ApJ Physical Properties of Tidal Features in Interacting Disk Galaxies Sang Hoon Oh, Woong-Tae Kim, Hyung Mok Lee Department of Physics and Astronomy, FPRD, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] and Jongsoo Kim Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon 305-348, Republic of Korea [email protected] ABSTRACT We investigate the physical properties of tidal structures in a disk galaxy created by gravitational interactions with a companion using numerical N-body simulations. We consider a simple galaxy model consisting of a rigid halo/bulge and an infinitesimally-thin stellar disk with Toomre parameter Q ≈ 2. A per- turbing companion is treated as a point mass moving on a prograde parabolic orbit, with varying mass and pericenter distance. Tidal interactions produce well-defined spiral arms and extended tidal features such as bridge and tail that are all transient, but distinct in nature. In the extended disks, strong tidal force is able to lock the perturbed epicycle phases of the near-side particles to the perturber, shaping them into a tidal bridge that corotates with the perturber. A tidal tail develops at the opposite side as strongly-perturbed, near-side parti- cles overtake mildly-perturbed, far-side particles. The tail is essentially a narrow material arm with a roughly logarithmic shape, dissolving with time because of large velocity dispersions. Inside the disks where tidal force is relatively weak, on the other hand, a two-armed logarithmic spiral pattern emerges due to the kinematic alignment of perturbed particle orbits. While self-gravity makes the spiral arms a bit stronger, the arms never become fully self-gravitating, wind up progressively with time, and decay after the peak almost exponentially in a time – 2 – scale of ∼ 1 Gyr. The arm pattern speed varying with both radius and time con- verges to Ω− κ/2 at late time, suggesting that the pattern speed of tidally-driven arms may depend on radius in real galaxies. Here, Ω and κ denote the angular and epicycle frequencies, respectively. We present the parametric dependences of various properties of tidal features on the tidal strength, and discuss our findings in application to tidal spiral arms in grand-design spiral galaxies. Subject headings: galaxies: spiral — galaxies: structure — galaxies: interactions — galaxies: evolution — methods: numerical 1. Introduction Spiral arms are the most outstanding morphological features in disk galaxies. They not only provide information on the dynamical states of the background stellar disks but also af- fect galactic evolution by triggering large-scale star formation in the gaseous component (see Elmegreen 1995; Bertin & Lin 1996; see also McKee & Ostriker 2007 and references therein). Regarding the nature of the spiral structure, two pictures have been proposed. In one pic- ture, the arms are viewed as quasi-stationary density waves that live long, rotating almost rigidly around the galactic centers (Lin & Shu 1964, 1966). Nonaxisymmetric instability of the stellar disks may grow to form a sort of self-sustained standing density waves in stellar disks (Bertin et al. 1989a,b; Bertin & Lin 1996). In the other picture, the arms are transient features driven, for example, by gravitational interaction with a companion galaxy (Toomre 1969; Toomre & Toomre 1972) or by swing amplification of leading waves (Julian & Toomre 1966; Goldreich & Lynden-Bell 1965; Toomre 1981). In this case, spiral features are short lived, lasting only for several rotation periods (∼ 1 Gyr) and perhaps requiring intermittent external forcing (e.g., Sellwood & Carlberg 1984). Observations indicate that the probability to have grand-design arms is much higher for galaxies in binaries or groups than in the field (Kormendy & Norman 1979; Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1982, 1987). This suggests that regardless of their nature, some of grand-design spiral arms are clearly excited by nearby galaxies through tidal interactions. Prototypical examples in- clude M51 and M81 that possess, respectively, companion galaxies NGC5195 and M82 within 50 kpc in distance. In a pioneering work, Toomre & Toomre (1972) used non-interacting test-particle simulations to demonstrate that gravitational interaction of a disk galaxy with its companion generates features such as tidal bridge and tail which are commonly seen in extended disks of interacting galaxies. Inclusion of self-gravity tends to enhance spiral struc- ture in the disks (e.g., Hernquist 1990). Grand-design spiral arms can be produced even by a low-mass perturber if the interaction involves a very close passage, indicating that tidal – 3 – arms may be more frequent than previously thought (Byrd & Howard 1992). Since Toomre & Toomre (1972), there have been many numerical studies of tidal in- including the detailed modelings of the arm morphologies in the teractions of galaxies, M51/NGC5195 system (e.g., Hernquist 1990; Howard & Byrd 1990; Barnes 1998; Salo & Laurikainen 2000a,b; Durrell et al. 2003) and in the NGC 7753/7752 system (Salo & Laurikainen 1993), formation of tidal tails and tidal dwarf galaxies therein (e.g., Barnes & Hernquist 1992, 1996; Elmegreen et al. 1993; Wetzstein et al. 2007), and formation of bars at the central parts of galaxies (e.g., Noguchi 1987; Gerin et al. 1990). In particular, by using numerical simula- tions with self-gravitating stars and gas, Salo & Laurikainen (2000a) argued that a bound multiple-passage orbit of NGC5195 better reproduces the observed kinematics of an extended H I tail of M51 (Rots et al. 1990), whereas the radial velocity data of the planetary nebu- lae associated with the tidal structures favor an unbound single-passage orbit (Durrell et al. 2003). Although these authors considered primarily the outer, extended tidal features for comparison, the spiral arms in the main disk may more tightly constrain the orbital pa- rameters of the M51 system. This is because the structure and kinematics of tidal tails depend rather sensitively on the observationally uncertain parameters such as a halo mass distribution (Dubinski et al. 1996). While the aforementioned work has improved our understanding of the tidally-induced morphological changes of galaxies chiefly in extended disks, these studies did not focus on spiral structures in the main disks that are more relevant to large-scale star formation. Stellar spiral arms are certainly one of the main agents that greatly influence dynamical evolution of the interstellar gas in disk galaxies. Since the turbulent and thermal sound speeds of the gas are small, the gas responds very strongly to the gravitational potential per- turbations imposed by the stellar spiral arms, readily forming galactic spiral shocks near the potential minima (Roberts 1969; Shu, Milione, & Roberts 1973; Woodward 1975). In optical images, these shocks appear as narrow dust lanes that represent regions where giant molec- ular clouds and new stars form (e.g., Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1983; Vogel et al 1988; Rand 1993; Elmegreen 1994; Shetty et al. 2007). Nonaxisymmetric gravitational instability occur- ring inside the dust lanes (e.g., Balbus 1988; Kim & Ostriker 2002, 2006; Shetty & Ostriker 2006) is most likely responsible for observed arm substructures including gaseous spurs (or feathers) that jut perpendicularly from the arms (e.g., Scoville et al. 2001; Willner et al. 2004; Calzetti et al. 2005; La Vigne et al. 2006). The strength of spiral shocks and their susceptibility to gravitational instability are strongly affected by the physical properties of stellar arms such as amplitude, pitch angle, pattern speed, etc, yet it is quite difficult to characterize them observationally. While the arm pitch angle can be determined relatively straightforwardly if the inclination of a galaxy – 4 – is known, it is challenging to measure the pattern speed unambiguously. For instance, the Tremaine & Weinberg (1984) method that has been applied to the CO data of several grand- design spiral galaxies (e.g., Zimmer et al. 2004) assumes, among others, that the pattern speed is independent of radius and that the molecular gas satisfies the mass conservation equation. In the case of M51, however, a recent study by Shetty et al. (2007) shows that observed density and velocity profiles across the disk do not obey the continuity equation in any frame rotating at a fixed angular speed. Also, the strength of spiral arms determined from K-band observations is prone to contamination by red supergiants in the arm regions (e.g., Rix & Rieke 1993; Patsis et al. 2001). Given these observational uncertainties, it is desirable to run numerical simulations to pin down the arm parameters and thus access the connection between stellar arms and large-scale star formation in gaseous arms. Motivated by these considerations, we in this paper use numerical N-body simulations to explore in detail the properties of stellar spiral arms resulting from tidal interactions. Since the parameter space is large, we consider an idealized galaxy model in which an infinitesimally-thin, two-dimensional, exponential stellar disk is immersed in a combined potential due to rigid halo and bulge. Self-gravitating particles comprising the disk respond to a point-mass perturber that passes on a prograde parabolic orbit in the same plane as the disk rotation; we vary the mass and pericenter distance of the perturber to study the situations with various tidal strength. The particles are not allowed to move out of the disk plane, and the effect of gas is ignored. A fully self-consistent treatment of the problem, using active halo and bulge as well as three-dimensional disks consisting of both stars and gas, will be studied in subsequent papers. Similar simulations have been carried out by Elmegreen et al. (1991) who showed that a cold stellar disk (with zero velocity dispersion) turns into a transient ocular shape if tidal perturbations are strong. In this work, we instead consider a disk galaxy with realistic velocity dispersions. Our main objectives are to study the quantitative changes in the properties of spiral arms as the tidal strength varies, and also to clarify the development and physical nature of tidal features known as bridge and tail in extended disks. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the galaxy model and the orbital parameters of tidal interactions as well as the numerical method we use. In §3, we focus on the transient extended-disk structures produced by strong tidal perturbations and show that the tidal bridge and tail form by distinct mechanisms. In §4, we measure the properties (pitch angle, strength, and pattern speed) of the spiral arms and present their temporal and radial variations. Finally, we summarize our results and discuss their astronomical implications in §5. – 5 – 2. Model and Numerical Method 2.1. The Model Galaxy In this paper we investigate the generation of tidal features and their properties in a disk galaxy via gravitational interactions with a point-mass perturber. The disk galaxy consists of three components: a spherical “dark” halo, a spherical bulge, and an exponential stellar disk; we do not consider a gaseous disk in the current work. The halo and bulge accounting for the inner linearly-rising part and the outer nearly-flat part of the rotation curve are represented by fixed gravitational potentials for simplicity. This will ignore the potential consequences on the disk through the tidal deformation of the halo and bulge.1 On the other hand, this inert halo and bulge enables a large number of particles for the stellar disk. In order to maximize the particle number for stars near the disk midplane, we impose a constraint that the disk remains infinitesimally thin during its whole evolution. Appendix A describes the specific model we employ for each component of the galaxy: a truncated logarithmic potential for the dark matter halo,2 a Plummer potential for the spherical bulge, and an exponential density profile for the disk. The total galaxy mass of Mg = 3.24 × 1011 M⊙ inside R = 25 kpc is dominated by the halo; the disk takes 16% of the total. We realize the infinitesimally-thin disk by distributing N = 514, 000 equal-mass particles on the disk plane and by assigning to them random velocities corresponding to the Toomre parameter of Q ≈ 2. This value of Q fairly well represents the stellar disk in the solar neighborhood and is large enough to prevent spontaneous generation of spiral arms via swing amplification in the absence of tidal forcing (e..g., Sellwood & Carlberg 1984; Bertin et al. 1989b). Before applying tidal perturbations, we evolve the galaxy in isolation for two Gyrs to relax the phase space distribution into a global equilibrium. Appendix B presents the temporal evolution of an isolated disk and radial profiles of various quantities when an equilibrium is reached. We take the particle distribution at 1 Gyr and use it as an initial condition for tidal encounter experiments. This guarantees that morphological and structural changes of the disk occurring during interactions with the perturber are entirely due to tidal perturbations. 1Since the velocity dispersions of dark matter particles are usually much larger than those of disk stars, the impact of the perturber to the disk through the live halo and bulge is small, as confirmed by Salo & Laurikainen (2000b). 2We have also run models without halo truncation and checked that the properties of tidal features inside 25 kpc are almost indistinguishable from those under the truncation. – 6 – 2.2. Perturber and Model Parameters As a perturbing companion, we consider a point particle with mass Mp that moves on a parabolic orbit relative to the center of the galaxy in a prograde fashion. To study the excitation of spiral arms as cleanly as possible (i.e. without disk warping and bending waves) and to be consistent with the thin-disk approximation, its trajectory is confined to the same plane as the galactic disk. Assuming that the galaxy whose center lies at R = 0 is spherical, the relative orbit (Rp, φp) of the perturber in the polar coordinates is given parametrically by Rp = Rperi(1 + x2), t =(cid:20) 1/2 2R3 peri G(Mg + Mp)(cid:21) (x + x3/3), (1) (2) where Mg is the total galaxy mass within 25 kpc, x ≡ tan(φp/2), and Rperi is the pericenter distance (e.g., Press & Teukolsky 1977). Note that t = 0 (or x = 0) corresponds to the pericenter passage of the perturber. To explore tidal encounters with various strength, we consider nine self-gravitating mod- els that differ only in the mass and the pericenter distance of the perturber. We also run one non-self-gravitating model to study the effect of self-gravity on the arm properties. Ta- ble 1 lists the parameters of each model and some simulation outcomes. Column (1) labels each run. Columns (2) and (3) give the perturber masss relative to the total galaxy mass and the pericenter distance, respectively. Column (4) lists the dimensionless tidal strength parameter defined by S =(cid:18)Mp Mg(cid:19)(cid:18) Rg Rperi(cid:19)3(cid:18) ∆T T (cid:19) , (3) which measures the momentum imparted by the perturber to a disk particle at Rg = 25 kpc relative to its original angular momentum (Elmegreen et al. 1991). Here, ∆T is the time elapsed for the perturber to move over one radian near the pericenter relative to the galaxy g/GMg)1/2 is the time taken by stars at R = Rg to rotate one radian center, and T ≡ (R3 about the galaxy center. Columns (5) and (6) give the fractions of the disk particles that are captured by the companion and those escaping from the whole system, respectively. Column (7) gives the time ttail when the tidal tail becomes strongest, while columns (8) and (9) list the pitch angle itail and surface density Σtail of the tail at t = ttail. Finally, column (10) gives the peak strength of the spiral arms. Model A2* is identical to model A2 except that the self-gravity of density perturbations in the disk is artificially taken to zero in the former. Note that the self-gravitational potential of the unperturbed axisymmetric disk, as represented by equation (A4), is still included in model A2* to make the rotation curve intact. Models A1 and C3 correspond to the strongest and weakest encounters, respectively. – 7 – In our presentation, the units of length and velocity are 1 kpc and 1 km s−1, respectively, which give the characteristic time unit of t0 = 0.98 Gyr. All the simulations run from t/t0 = −1.0, corresponding to (Rp, φp) = (178.3 kpc,−45.6◦) for our fiducial model A2, to t/t0 = 3.0. Seen from the above, the perturber passes through the pericenter (Rperi, 0) at t = 0 in the counterclockwise direction which is the same sense as the disk rotation. 2.3. Numerical Method To evolve disk particles in response to tidal perturbations, we use the GADGET code In GAD- that is parallelized on a distributed-memory platform (Springel et al. 2001). GET, the evaluation of gravitational force uses the Barnes-Hut hierarchical tree algorithm (Barnes & Hut 1986) and assumes a spline-softened mass distribution of a point mass. Ex- cept at the beginning of the simulations, GADGET employs a new cell-opening criterion Ml4 > αaoldr6, which produces, at a lower computational expense, force accuracy compa- rable to that obtained from the standard criterion r > l/θ. Here, α and θ specify prescribed force error tolerances, M and l are the total mass and size of a cell, r is the distance of a particle to the center-of-mass of the cell, and aold is the gravitational acceleration on the particle computed at the previous timestep. For all the models presented in this paper, we adopt α = 0.02 and θ = 0.8. For the gravitational softening, we take a softening length of h = 0.4 kpc; the equivalent Plummer softening length is ǫ = h/2.8 = 0.14 kpc (Springel et al. 2001). The relaxation time associated with the force softening amounts to tR ≈ σ3ǫ/(πG2Σ0m), where σ = √σRσφ and m is the particle mass (Rybicki 1971). Since this time is longer than 10 Gyrs for R > 1 kpc and N = 5 × 105, tidal features that form in the stellar disk are not contaminated by particle noises and relaxation (e.g., White 1988). Particles are advanced by a second-order leapfrog scheme with fully adaptive and individual timesteps. All the simulations have been performed on an IBM p690 cluster using 16 processors, taking typically ∼ 25 hours for a single run. 2.4. Limitations of This Work In this work we employ highly idealized models of galaxies, perturbers, and their tidal encounters, and consider a limited range of tidal strength. This obviously introduces a few important caveats that should be noted from the outset: 1. An infinitesimally-thin stellar disk imposed in the simulations neglects non-planar mo- – 8 – tions of stars such as in vertical oscillations and warps. It also overestimates self-gravity at the disk midplane. 2. While a perturbing companion more likely has an extended density profile in real situations, we represent it as a point mass, which may overestimate the tidal force at the closest approach, possibly affecting the shape and structure of tidal bridge and tail that form in extended disks. 3. Since we treat the galactic halo and bulge as being dynamically inactive, it is convenient to evolve the entire system in the coordinates centered on the center of the galaxy. This naturally ignores centrifugal and Coriolis forces that arise from the orbital motion of the galaxy relative to the center of mass of the whole system. The neglect of the indirect forces may spuriously suppress the growth of m = 1 spiral modes in the stellar disk, where m is the azimuthal wavenumber (e.g., Adams et al. 1989; Ostriker et al. 1992), although it is unlikely to much affect m = 2 and higher order modes. 4. By employing the prescribed parabolic orbit for a perturber, we neither consider the back reaction of the stellar disk to the perturber nor allow multiple encounters that would occur if the perturber is in a bound orbit. Furthermore, the prescribed orbit and the rigid halo and bulge do not allow us to capture the potential effects of dynamical friction and ensuing orbital decay of the interacting galaxies, which may make the tidal tails longer and stronger (see e.g., Barnes 1988). 5. Limited to the cases with S <∼ 0.25, tidal tails created in our models are relatively weak and survive only for ∼ 0.3 Gyrs (see §3.2). The current weak- or moderate-encounter models preclude the possibility of prominent tails found in many interacting systems that live long (∼ 1 Gyr or longer) and sometimes fragment into tidal dwarf galaxies (e.g., Barnes 1988, 1992; Barnes & Hernquist 1992; Wetzstein et al. 2007), which may occur when tidal interactions are very strong. Given these constraints and limitations, we by no means attempt to reproduce tidal deformation of real galaxies. We instead focus on the formation mechanisms and physi- cal nature of tidally-driven disk structures, and compare the simulation results with the predictions of analytic theories, for which the simplifications made above are appropriate. 3. Extended Tidal Features Using a restricted three-body technique, Toomre & Toomre (1972) demonstrated that tidal perturbations distort the extended portions of a disk to produce elongated and narrow – 9 – features, phenomenologically termed “bridge” and “tail”. The bridge is built at the near side of the disk toward the perturber, while the tidal tail or “counterstream” forms at the far side (e.g., Pfleiderer 1963). Self-consistent numerical simulations including the disk self-gravity show that tidal perturbations excite not only extended tidal streams but also spiral arms in the main disks (e.g., Hernquist 1990; Byrd & Howard 1992; Salo & Laurikainen 1993). In this section, we focus on extended tidal features and distinguish between the physical mechanisms that form bridge and tail, some of which have previously been overlooked. 3.1. Tidal Bridge To illustrate the dynamical responses of extended disks to a tidal perturber, we begin by presenting in detail the results from our fiducial model A2 with Mp/Mg = 0.4 and Rperi = 35 kpc. Evolution of the other models are qualitatively similar. Figure 1 shows the morphological evolution of the stellar disk in model A2. The arrow and the associated number in each panel indicate the direction and distance (in kpc) to the perturber, respectively. Only 20% of the particles are plotted to delineate tidal features from the disk. Figure 2 displays the perturbed surface densities of model A2 in the φ − log R plane. At early time when the perturber is far away from the galaxy (t <∼ − 0.1), the tidal deformation of the disk is vanishingly small. As the perturber approaches the pericenter, the disk begins to undergo significant morphological changes, first forming a bridge (t ∼ 0.0 − 0.1) at the outskirts of the disk close to the perturber and then a tail at the opposite side (t ∼ 0.2). Tidal force imposed by the perturber excites the epicycle orbits of individual particles. In Appendix C, we use an impulse approximation to estimate the amplitudes δR of the perturbed epicycle orbits in an averaged sense. Figure 3 plots as thin lines the resulting δR with differing Mp based on the impulse approximation. The thick line is for the case with no tidal perturbations in which the radial oscillations of particles are purely due to the initial velocity dispersions. Also plotted as various symbols are the dispersions h(R − R0)2i1/2 of the particle positions R at t = 0 with respect to the initial locations R0 for models A2, B2, and C2. Here, the angular brackets h i denote an average over the particles in a given radial bin. Note that the numerical results are in good agreement with the corresponding analytic In regions of disks with R <∼ 15 kpc, the deviation estimates over a wide range of radii. from the original epicycle orbits is quite small. It nevertheless enables well-defined spiral structure there, as we will discuss in §4. In the extended disks, on the other hand, strong tidal perturbations severely affect the orbits of particles, causing them to traverse over large radial distances. Since the tidal force is asymmetric, particles at the near side to the perturber are – 10 – more easily pulled radially outward and will subsequently find themselves subject to even greater tidal force at larger R.3 Particles whose velocities exceed the escape velocity become unbound, and either are captured by the perturber or escape from the combined galaxy- perturber system (Toomre & Toomre 1972). The fraction of the captured particles and the non-captured, freely escaping particles are given in columns (5) and (6) of Table 1, respectively; these are fitted roughly with Mcap/Md = 0.95S2.08 and Mesc/Md = 0.67S2.92 for 0.04 <∼ S <∼ 0.3. In model C3 with S = 0.029, the tidal force is too weak to accelerate particles to the escape velocity. Although less than 7% of the total even in our strongest encounter model A1, the amount of mass stripped off by the tidal force depends fairly steeply on the tidal strength, and can be substantial for encounters with large S. While the bridge is a pathway through which mass transfer occurs, it also contains a significant amount of bound particles. Due to strong tidal force, the orbits of these bound particles are eventually arranged in such a manner that the maximum radial velocities always occur in the direction to the perturber while the perturber remains close to the pericenter. This is well illustrated in Figure 4 which plots the azimuthal distributions of the particle velocities at R = 20 kpc in model A2 for t ≤ 0.3. In each panel, the vertical dotted lines indicate the direction, φp, to the perturber. Although the morphological change of the disk is almost absent when t = −0.1 (see Fig. 1), the signature of the tidal interaction is already apparent in the azimuthal variations of the particle velocities. Note that in the bridge both vR and ∂vφ/∂φ are maximized at φ = φp(t) at the epochs shown in Figure 4. That is, the phases of particle orbits are locked to the perturber during this time interval. Since the epicycle motions occur in the opposite sense to the disk rotation, this phase locking implies that vφ steadily decreases as the particles continue galactic rotation past the perturber. It attains minimum values near the leading edge of the bridge. It is at this leading edge where the particles fall rapidly radially inward, rendering the leading boundary of the bridge rather sharp. Figure 5 displays distortions of rings at several different initial radii R0 during the early phase of the tidal encounter. Near-side particles in a ring with larger R0 are pulled out earlier and by greater amount toward the perturber, shaping the ring into an egg-shaped oval. The tips of outer ovals become lagging behind the perturber.4 At the same time, new particles from inner rings that rotate fast are pulled out to lead the perturber. This constructs a 3In the case of model A2, the ratio of the tidal forces at the near and far sides is 2.0 and 7.5 at R = 8 and 20 kpc, respectively. 4The perturber in model A2 has an angular velocity of Ω = 9.54 km s−1 kpc−1 at the pericenter. Since the corresponding corotation radius is R = 25 kpc in the disk, all the near-side particles shown in Figure 5 would lead the perturber were it not for strong tidal perturbations and the resulting phase locking. – 11 – transient pattern that persists while the perturber is close to the pericenter (∼ a few tenths of Gyrs), with the pattern speed roughly equal to the instantaneous angular velocity of the perturber. As Figure 1 shows, the bridge in model A2 (and also in other models) lasts until t ∼ 0.3 after which the perturber is too far away to tightly enforce the alignment of the epicycle orbits. Therefore, the bridge is a transient structure that not only allows mass transfer to the companion but also consists of bound particles that execute coherent forced oscillations in response to the applied tidal perturbations. 3.2. Tidal Tail Tidal torque applied at the far side of the disk causes the leading (lagging) particles with respect to the line connecting the disk center and the perturber to lose (gain) angular momentum and thus to rotate slower (faster). This gives rise to a negative gradient of the circular velocity along the azimuthal direction. One may naively expect that the compressive velocity fields in the azimuthal direction should be a cause of a tidal tail at the far side, but this is not the case. The third panel of Figure 4 shows that the velocity gradient amounts to ∂vφ/∂φ ∼ −50 km s−1 rad−1 for the far-side particles at R = 20 kpc when the perturber is at the pericenter. Assuming that this value remains constant over a time interval ∆t, the resulting fractional change δΣ/Σ of the surface density would be ∼ ∆t∂vφ/(R∂φ) ∼ 0.5 for ∆t = 0.2 Gyr, which is too small to build a tidal tail in its own right. Therefore, the tail formation must involve additional processes. Figure 5 demonstrates the tail-making process in our models. Let us pay attention to the two groups of particles, denoted by dots in black or cyan, in the ring with R0 = 22− 24 kpc. The dots in cyan representing a group of far-side particles at t = −0.05 are slowly rotating about the disk center, with a period of ∼ 0.6 Gyr, by following moderately perturbed epicycle orbits. With relatively weak tidal force, the locking of the epicycle phases is not significant at the far side. On the other hand, the near-side particles in black that were ahead of the perturber at t = −0.05 have highly perturbed orbits, plunging toward the disk center as deep as R ∼ 9 kpc at t = 0.05. The constraint of angular momentum conservation requires the particles to rotate faster at small R, providing them with a shortcut route to reach the far side (t ∼ 0.10 − 0.15). A tidal tail develops as these strongly-perturbed, fast-rotating, near-side particles catch up with those mildly-perturbed, far-side particles (t ∼ 0.15 − 0.2) (e.g., Pfleiderer 1963; Toomre & Toomre 1972). Note that the outer-disk particles located in between the black and cyan dots, i.e., the particles with φ ∼ π/4 − π at t = 0 in the red ring in Figure 5, are all gathered into the tail extending to ∼ 40 kpc from the disk center. Since the tail at a given radius is comprised of – 12 – particles from a wide range of radii in the unperturbed disk, it has large velocity dispersions both in the radial and azimuthal directions (t = 0.2 frame of Fig. 4). Accordingly, the tail in model A2 becomes weak and dispersed as the particles continue galactic rotation. This implies that the tails in our models are transient material arms. Figure 2 shows that the tail in model A2 forms at t ≈ 0.2, is more or less logarithmic in shape with a pitch angle of tan i ∼ 0.5, and becomes more pronounced than the bridge. Time of tail formation ttail, its pitch angle itail, and its strength as defined by the surface density Σtail at R = 20 kpc and t = ttail of course depend on the the strength of tidal perturbations and the presence of self-gravity. Columns (7)-(9) in Table 1 list ttail, tan itail, and Σtail for models with S > 0.07; models B3, C1, C2, and C3 with very weak tidal perturbations do not produce readily identifiable tail structure. These values are plotted in Figure 6 as solid circles against S, which are well fitted with power laws: ttail = 0.07S −0.54, tan itail = 0.75S0.22, and Σtail/Σ20 = 79.0S0.72, where Σ20 indicates the surface density of the initial disk at R = 20 kpc. Definitely, a tail develops earlier and stronger for stronger tidal perturbations, although the pitch angle depends weakly on S. Note that the tidal tail in the non-self-gravitating model A2* is weaker and more loosely wound than that in model A2. As mentioned above, a tidal bridge in the near side consists of particles in coherent forced oscillations, while a tail in the opposite side forms by temporary particle overlapping. Both are transient features whose amplitudes decay after t ∼ 0.2 − 0.3. As the perturber on a parabolic orbit moves away from the galaxy in our models, the diminished tidal force no longer aligns the phases of the particle orbits in the bridge. In addition, the large velocity dispersions of the tail are unable to keep it as narrow as when it first forms. Consequently, the particles making up the bridge and tail gradually spread out and follow galactic orbits with large eccentricities. They interact with each other and also with spiral arms, producing complicated structures seen at the extended parts of the disk in Figures 1 and 2. The further diffusion and interactions of particles eventually make the outer disk almost featureless in our simulations. 4. Disk Structure We have seen in §3.1 that the enhancement of epicycle amplitudes due to tidal per- turbations is rather small in regions of disks with R <∼ 15 kpc. Nevertheless, the phases of perturbed epicycle orbits at different radii drift at different rates and are kinematically orga- nized to develop a trailing two-armed spiral pattern there (e.g., Toomre 1969; Donner et al. 1991). Figure 7 displays close-up views of density snapshots of model A2 in the x–y plane. A well-defined, two-armed spiral pattern is apparent for t ∼ 0.2 − 1.0, becoming most con- – 13 – spicuous at t ∼ 0.3 − 0.4. The spiral arms that appear as straight lines in the φ− ln R plane (see Fig. 2) are approximately logarithmic, with a pitch angle varying with time. An inspection of Figure 2 reveals that the arms extend inward up to R ≈ 4 kpc, corresponding to the inner Lindblad resonance (ILR), and smoothly join the the extended- disk features at t = 0.2. Since the pattern speed of the arms is smaller than the angular speed of the disk rotation, however, they soon decouple from the tidal tail (t = 0.3), and from the bridge at later time (t = 0.4 − 0.5) when the phase locking becomes inefficient. The spiral arms in our models are not stationary in the sense that their pattern speed is not constant over radius and that their pitch angle and amplitude vary with time. In this section, we explore the quantitative properties of the spiral arms. 4.1. Pitch Angle Since the spiral arms that form in our models are logarithmic, it is useful to define the Fourier coefficients in φ and ln R as A(m, p) = 1 N N Xj=1 exp(i[mφj + p ln Rj]), (4) where N is the total number of particles, (Rj, φj) are the coordinates of the j-th par- ticle, and p is related to the pitch angle of an m−armed spiral through tan i = m/p (Sellwood & Carlberg 1984; Sellwood & Athanassoula 1986). A positive (negative) value of p corresponds to trailing (leading) spirals. Figure 8 plots the temporal evolution of the Fourier amplitudes A(2, p) of the m = 2 logarithmic spiral mode in model A2 before the arms reach the maximum strength (t < 0.3). We consider particles only at R = 5 − 10 kpc where the pattern in model A2 achieves large amplitudes and contamination from the bridge and tail is almost absent. At early time (t <∼ 0.04), the modal growth occurs as the dominant p shifts from negative to positive values. This is suggestive of mild swing amplification in which seed perturbations grow as they change from leading to trailing. Since the corresponding amplification factor is less than 10 when Q ∼ 2 (Goldreich & Lynden-Bell 1965; Julian & Toomre 1966; Toomre 1981) and since swing amplification becomes no longer efficient at p >∼ 5 (e.g., Sellwood & Carlberg 1984), however, the further growth of the spiral modes cannot be attributable to swing amplification. It is rather due to the kinematic effects, enhanced by self-gravity, of the perturbed epicycle orbits in a manner described in Toomre (1969). As the phases of the epicycle orbits drift and are coherently arranged, the density associated with the pattern grows quite rapidly and saturates at t ∼ 0.3 in model A2. – 14 – It is well known that kinematic density waves without self-gravity tend to wind up due to the background differential rotation, with the pitch angle varying as −1 tan i = t−1(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) d(Ω − κ/2) d ln R (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) , (5) (e.g., Binney & Tremaine 1987). In the theory of quasi-stationary density waves hypoth- esized by Lin & Shu (1964, 1966), self-gravity of the spirals compensates for the winding tendency of the arms, keeping their pattern speed at a constant value over a wide range of radii. In order to check if this is the case in our simulations, we calculate the pitch angle of the arms determined from p that maximizes A(2, p) at a given time. Figure 9 shows the temporal changes in tan i of the spiral arms located at R = 5−10 kpc, 8−13 kpc, and 11−16 kpc for the self-gravitating models A2, B2, and C2, respectively. For comparison, Figure 9 also plots the results of the non-self-gravitating model A2* for the arm segments in an an- nulus with R = 8.0 − 8.5 kpc, over which d(Ω − κ/2)/d ln R is almost constant. Although the arm pitch angle in model A2* exhibits small fluctuations, the late-time portion can be well described by tan i ∝ t−1, consistent with the theoretical prediction (eq. [5]).5 For the self-gravitating models, the arms have moderate pitch angles amounting to tan i ∼ 0.3 − 0.4 when they grow and stand out initially. After attaining substantial strength, they begin to wind as tan i ∝ t−0.5∼−0.6, with a smaller power index corresponding to stronger arms. This suggests that although self-gravity reduces the winding rate considerably, it cannot completely suppress the winding tendency of the spiral arms in our models.6 Once finding the arm pitch angle and pattern speed (see below), we are able to compare the WKB theory of linear density waves with the simulation results. The local theory for tightly-wound linear waves in a stellar disk states that the perturbed radial velocity δvR and azimuthal velocity δvφ are related to the perturbed surface density δΣ through δvR = − δvφ = − i 2 κ2 ΩkR νκ Σ (cid:19) , kR (cid:18)δΣ F (2) Fν(x) (cid:18)δΣ Σ (cid:19) , ν (x) (6) (7) 5 Since the Fourier method picks up, in a given annulus, the most dominant spiral modes that propagate radially inward, the time dependence of tan i can also be affected by the radial variation of d(Ω− κ/2)/d ln R if the annulus is wide enough. For instance, the average pitch angle of the arms in the R = 8− 13 kpc region in model A2, over which d(Ω−κ/2)/d ln R varies by 13% relative to the mean value, decays as tan i ∝ t−0.94. 6 In addition to the background shear, short trailing waves in the presence of self-gravity would increase their radial wavenumber kR as they propagate inward from the corotation radius, capable of decreasing the pitch angle further (Toomre 1969). – 15 – (Lin, Yuan, & Shu 1969). Here, kR ≡ m/(R tan i) is the local radial wavenumber of the waves, x ≡ (kRσR/κ)2, ν ≡ (Ωp − mΩ)/κ is the dimensionless angular frequency with Ωp denoting the pattern speed, and Fν(x) and F (2) ν are the reduction factors defined by equations (B9) and (B17) of Lin, Yuan, & Shu (1969), respectively. In equation (7), the imaginary unit i represents the phase shift between δvφ and δΣ. Figure 10 gives exemplary comparisons between the numerical results and the linear- theory predictions for the azimuthal variations of the perturbed variables. Two sets of numerical data near R = 10 kpc at t = 0.4 in model A2 and at t = 0.5 in model C2 are arbitrarily taken. In the top panels, black curves with some fluctuations draw δΣ/Σ from numerical simulations, while red lines plot the corresponding m = 2 Fourier modes δΣm=2. In the middle and bottom panels, red curves draw equations (6) and (7) corresponding to δΣm=2. Blue curves represent the azimuthally-binned averages of vR and δvφ = vφ − ¯vφ that are plotted as dots from the simulations. Apparently, the perturbed density in model C2 is in the linear regime and dominated by the m = 2 mode. Note that in spite of large dispersions in vR and δvφ, there is fairly good agreement between the numerical and analytic results for model C2. On the other hand, the spiral arms in model A2 are asymmetric and clearly in the nonlinear regime. In this case, the perturbed velocities have significant contributions from high-m modes (e.g., Vandervoort 1971), rising more steeply than a simple sinusoidal curve as particles leave the spiral arms. Among the models listed in Table 1, we found that models B3, C2, and C3 with relatively weak tidal perturbations (S < 0.06) produce linear spiral arms with sinusoidal density distributions. All the other models we considered show significantly nonlinear features in the density and velocity profiles. This implies that tidally-excited stellar spiral arms in grand-design spiral galaxies probably have non-linear amplitudes. 4.2. Arm Strength One of the key parameters that directly influence gas flows in spiral galaxies is the strength of stellar spiral arms. Stronger spiral arms imply larger enhancement of gas density at the galactic shocks and hence more active star formation. To quantify the arm strength, we define 2πGδ Σm=2 RΩ2 F ≡ , (8) where δ Σm=2 denotes the amplitude of δΣm=2. Since the corresponding gravitational poten- R + m2R−2)1/2 for a tightly-wound spiral tial perturbation is given by δΦm = −2πGδΣm/(k2 in an infinitesimally-thin disk, F measures the gravitational force due to the spiral arms in – 16 – the direction perpendicular to the arms relative to the the axisymmetric radial force RΩ2 in the unperturbed state (e.g., Roberts 1969; Shu, Milione, & Roberts 1973; Kim & Ostriker 2002). Figure 11 plots the radial variations of F for the arms averaged over the time interval ∆t = 0.4 centered at the epoch when the arm amplitudes are maximized. In a given model, F broadly peaks at a certain range of radii; Rmax ∼ 5 − 10 kpc for models A1, A2, B1, and C1, Rmax ∼ 8 − 13 kpc for models A2, A3, and B2, and Rmax ∼ 11 − 16 kpc for models B3, C2, and C3. This demonstrates that more distant encounters excite spiral features in regions with larger R. The arms become progressively weaker toward the disk center since the ratio of the tidal perturbations to the background gravity is proportional roughly to R2 for small radii. They eventually attain vanishingly small amplitudes inside R ≈ 4 kpc corresponding to the ILR through which stellar spiral waves cannot propagate.7 Although the tidal perturbations are strong in extended disks, on the other hand, F still decreases with increasing R (> Rmax). This is because the amount of mass available to construct spiral arms in the background stellar disk declines very rapidly with radius. Figure 11 also shows that self-gravitating spiral arms in model A2 are stronger by about a factor of 1.5 and located relatively closer to the center than non-self-gravitating arms in model A2. To study how rapidly spiral arms grow and how long they survive, we plot in Figure 12 the temporal variations of F averaged over a range of radii where the arms are strongest in each model. Obviously, the arms grow earlier and more rapidly for models with stronger tidal perturbations. For instance, it takes only ∼ 0.1 − 0.3 Gyrs for the strong-encounter models A1 and A2 to achieve the peak strength, while more than 1 Gyrs are required for the weak encounter models. Figure 13 plots the peak value Fmax of the arm strength as a function of the tidal strength S, showing roughly Fmax = 0.79S0.83. Since the formation of tidal spiral arms in a disk involves the gathering of particles from different radii, the velocity dispersions increase as the arms grow. In addition, gravitational scatterings of stellar particles off the arms become efficient to heat the disk once the arms acquire considerable amplitudes, counterbalancing the arm-amplifying effect of self-gravity (e.g., Sellwood & Carlberg 1984; Binney & Tremaine 1987; Binney 2001). In all the models we have considered, the arms never become fully self-gravitating. They stop growing and decay as the enhanced velocity dispersions make the once well-organized epicycle orbits kinematically less coherent. Figure 12 shows that for the self-gravitating models, F decreases 7It is unclear whether the absence of spiral arms at R < 4 kpc in our models is mainly due to the ILR barrier or just because the tidal perturbations are too weak to excite density waves there. We have run a model simulation (not listed in Table 1) corresponding to model A2 but without the bulge (hence no ILR) only to find that the inner disk is contaminated by the formation of a central bar (e.g., Noguchi 1987). – 17 – after the peak almost exponentially in a time scale of ∼ 1 Gyrs, whereas spiral arms in the non-self-gravitating model A2 decay much more slowly since they do not experience secular disk heating. Strong encounter models possess spiral arms with F ≥ 5% for ∼ 1 Gyrs, corresponding to four disk rotations at R = 10 kpc, while spiral arms in the weak-encounter model C3 have F <∼ 3% throughout the entire evolution. Small-amplitude fluctuations of F at t >∼ 1 are caused by the interactions with the particles once pertaining to the bridge and tail. 4.3. Pattern Speed Finally, we discuss the pattern speed of the tidal arms formed in our simulations. To measure the pattern speed at a given radius, we define the normalized cross-correlation of the perturbed surface densities at two fixed times separated by ∆t as C(R, θ, t) = 1 Σ0(R)2 Z 2π 0 δΣ(R, φ, t)δΣ(R, φ + θ, t + ∆t)dφ. (9) For a sufficiently small value of ∆t, the instantaneous arm pattern speed at a given radius is then determined by Ωp(R, t) = θmax/∆t, where θmax denotes the phase angle at which C(R, θ, t) is maximized. We take ∆t = 0.1 in calculating Ωp from the numerical data. Figure 14 plots as contours the amplitudes of C(R, θ, t) on the radius (R)−frequency (θ/∆t) domain for some selected time epochs of models A2 and A2. The solid and dashed lines draw the radial variations of Ω and Ω± κ/2, respectively, from the initial disk rotation. At t = 0.1, the spiral arms in both models are relatively weak and the cross-correlation is dominated by the extended-disk features, especially by the tidal bridge. The bridge rotates almost rigidly at a fixed pattern speed (∼ 9.5 km s−1 kpc−1), corresponding to the angular frequency of the perturber at the pericenter. This evidences the phase locking of particle orbits in the bridge explained in §3.1. The tail at the opposite side of the perturber becomes strong at about t = 0.2, significantly contributing to C(R, θ, t) at R >∼ 17 kpc. Interestingly, the instantaneous pattern speed of the tail is similar to that of the bridge at this time. As time evolves further, the extended tidal structures become weaker since the perturber moves farther away, while the spiral arms become more pronounced in the distribution of C(R, θ, t). When the arms are quite strong (t ∼ 0.2−0.6) in model A2, their patten speed decreases with radius, indicating that they are not a “pattern” in a strict sense. This is the reason why the pitch angle of the arms decreases with time. Since the axisymmetric background state of the stellar disk as well as the shape and pitch angle of the arms are already known, – 18 – one can calculate the theoretical pattern speed predicted from the WKB dispersion relation ν2 = 1 − 2πGΣkR κ2 Fν(x), (10) for tightly-wound density waves (Lin, Yuan, & Shu 1969). The dotted line in each of the left panels of Figure 14 shows Ωp obtained from equation (10), which traces the loci of maximum C(R, θ, t) fairly well. Note that equation (10) would simply yield ν ≈ −1 or Ωp = Ω − κ/2 without self-gravity, in excellent agreement with the pattern speed of spiral arms in model A2 for t >∼ 0.3. Although the presence of self-gravity tends to enhance the arm pattern speed, our numerical results suggest that its effect is quite small; for all the models considered, Ωp is below ∼ 20 km s−1 kpc−1 even when the arms reach the peak strength, and it comes very close to the Ω−κ/2 curve at t >∼ 0.6. This implies that the spiral arms at least at late time are kinematic spiral waves in which the large velocity dispersions of particles as well as the kinematic winding of the arms make self-gravity unimportant. 5. Summary & Discussion 5.1. Summary Galactic spiral shocks and their substructure-forming instabilities in disk galaxies are strongly affected by stellar spiral arms that are often triggered by tidal interactions with a companion galaxy. To gain an insight on the large-scale star formation occurring in the gaseous component and related evolution of disk galaxies, it is crucial to understand the physical properties of tidally-induced stellar arms. While the literature abounds with studies of tidal interactions of galaxies, most of them concentrate mainly on morphological transformation, especially in the extended parts, of disk galaxies. In this paper, we have initiated numerical N-body experiments for tidal encounters to quantify the properties of spiral arms that form in the disks and study how their properties vary with tidal strength. We also study the nature of the tidal bridge and tail that develop in the outer regions. We consider a simple galaxy model consisting of a rigid halo/bulge and a razor-thin stellar disk with Toomre stability parameter of Q ≈ 2. A perturbing companion galaxy is treated as a point-mass potential moving on a prescribed, prograde, parabolic orbit in the same plane as the galactic disk. By varying the mass and pericenter distance of the perturber, we explore tidal interactions with strength in the range of 0.03 <∼ S <∼ 0.3, where S is the dimensionless momentum applied by the perturber to stars at outer disks (see eq. [3]). Our main results are summarized as follows. – 19 – 1. The tidal bridge forms at the near side to the perturber as particles in outer disks are pulled out by strong tidal perturbations. Some particles with velocities exceeding the escape velocity become unbound, and either are captured by the perturber or escape from the system, but these are less than 7% of the total for S <∼ 0.3. On the other hand, bound particles with low velocities in the bridge execute coherent forced oscillations in such a way that the maximum radial velocities vR and the maximum gradient of the azimuthal velocities ∂vφ/∂φ are always attained in the direction toward the perturber. This phase locking of the perturbed particle orbits allows the bridge to construct a transient pattern that corotates with the perturber as long as the perturber remains close to the pericenter (t <∼ 0.3). The phase locking is also a cause of the sharp leading edge of the bridge, where particles begin to fall radially inward during their forced oscillations. 2. Only strong tidal encounters with S > 0.07 produce a recognizable tail (or counter- stream) at the far side of the disk. The tail develops as strongly-perturbed, near-side particles overtake mildly-perturbed, far-side particles. When the tail achieves a peak strength, it is very narrow and in a roughly logarithmic shape. For 0.07 <∼ S <∼ 0.3 we have considered, the formation epoch ttail, pitch angle itail, and the surface density Σtail of the tail depend on the tidal strength parameter S as ttail = 0.07S −0.54, tan itail = 0.75S0.22, and Σtail/Σd = 79S0.72 at R = 20 kpc. Comprising of particles collected from a wide range of radii in the unper- turbed disk, the tail is a material arm and has large velocity dispersions, so that it widens and weakens with time. 3. Even though the boost of epicycle amplitudes due to tidal perturbations is quite small in regions with R <∼ 15 kpc, the perturbed particle orbits are kinematically organized to generate two-armed global spiral arms there. With Q ≈ 2 in the unperturbed disk, the self- gravity of stars does not play a dominant role in growing the spiral modes, although it appears to enhance the amplitudes considerably when the arms are nonlinear. The spiral arms are approximately logarithmic in shape and subject to kinematic winding. For the parameters we have explored, the pitch angle of the spiral arms is in the range of tan i ∼ 0.3 − 0.4 when the arms attain peak amplitudes and then decreases as tan i ∝ t−0.5∼−0.6, with a smaller decay rate corresponding to stronger arms. 4. Stronger encounter models tend to develop stronger spiral arms earlier and more toward the galaxy center, resulting in the arms at R ∼ 5 − 10 kpc, ∼ 0.1 − 0.3 Gyr after the pericenter passage for models with S > 0.13. Arms are absent inward of R = 4 kpc corresponding to the inner Lindblad resonance. In terms of the parameter F (eq. [8]) that measures the perturbed radial force due to the spiral arms relative to the mean axisymmetric gravity, the maximum strength of the spiral arms behaves as Fmax = 0.79S0.83. Because of large velocity dispersions associated with the particle gathering and secular heating, the – 20 – arms never become fully self-gravitating and decay after the peak almost exponentially in a time scale of ∼ 1 Gyr. 5. Analyses using the normalized cross-correlation of the perturbed densities reveal that the arm pattern speed Ωp is not constant in both radius and time, indicating that spiral arms that form in our models are not exactly a pattern. In fact, Ωp decreases with radius, causing the pitch angle to decrease with time. Self-gravity tends to increase Ωp, but only below ∼ 20 km s−1 kpc−1 even when the arms are strongest. Self-gravity becomes unimportant as the arms decay, resulting in Ωp ≈ Ω − κ/2 at late time. 5.2. Discussion We have seen in this paper that spiral arms produced by tidal encounters are approxi- mately logarithmic in shape, similarly to observed spiral arms in many grand-design spiral galaxies (e.g., Kennicutt 1981; Elmegreen et al. 1989; Shetty et al. 2007). The occurrence of the logarithmic arms in our models can be understood as follows. As mentioned above, the arms are kinematic density waves modified by self-gravity. Ignoring the effect of self- gravity and assuming that the phases of the waves are aligned along φ = φp = 0 at t = 0, corresponding to the impulsive tidal perturbations applied at the pericenter, the pitch angle of kinematic density waves with m = 2 is given by equation (5). If the right-hand side of equation (5) is independent of R, the arms have a perfect logarithmic shape. It turns out that the galaxy rotation curve we adopt (Fig. 15) has an approximately constant value of d(Ω − κ/2)/d ln R ∼ 3.5 ± 0.5 km s−1 kpc−1 over the distance from the ILR radius out to the edge of the disk. This results in ∆ tan i/ tan i ∼ 0.15 over a range of radii where spiral arms are strong, indicating that the variation of the pitch angle along the arms is in fact very small. The presence of self-gravity as well as epicycle motions of particles are likely to further smooth out the local variation of tan i. Our numerical results show that self-gravity is unable to keep the arm pitch angles fixed over time. A larger rate of shear in the rotation curve implies a smaller arm pitch angle for kinematic arms. Indeed, Seigar et al. (2005, 2006) reported a well-defined negative correlation between the arm pitch and the shear rate for a sample of (not necessarily tidally- driven) spiral galaxies, suggesting that spiral arms in real galaxies are unlikely to be fully self-gravitating. While we adopt highly simplified models for both the disk galaxy and the orbital param- eters of tidal interactions, it is still interesting to compare the arm properties found in our simulations with those of observed spiral arms. In the case of the M51/NGC5195 system, – 21 – the mass ratio of the target galaxy to the companion is estimated to be ∼ 0.3 − 0.55 (e.g., Smith et al. 1990; Salo & Laurikainen 2000a). The encounter models that well reproduce the kinematics and morphologies of the M51 system favor an inclined orbit with the pericen- ter distance of 20 − 30 kpc (Salo & Laurikainen 2000a). Since the thin disk approximation and non-inclined orbits taken in our models tend to produce stronger tidal arms than in the thick-disk, inclined-orbit counterparts, models A1 and A2 can perhaps be best compared with the M51/NGC5195 system. K-band observations indicate that the radially-averaged spiral arm strength F is around 20% for M51 (e.g., Scoville et al. 2001; Salo & Laurikainen 2000b; see also Rix & Rieke 1993; Rix & Zaritsky 1995), which is not much different from ∼ 17 − 22% found for models A1 and A2 at t ∼ 0.1 − 0.3 (Figs. 11 and 12). The arms in M51 are logarithmic spirals with a pitch angle of tan i ∼ 0.39 (Shetty et al. 2007), which is again close to the arm pitch angle in model A2 at t ∼ 0.2 − 0.3. Among the properties of spiral arms, the most intriguing is the pattern speed that is not well constrained by observations. Elmegreen et al. (1989) identified 4 : 1 resonance features in the arms of M51 to find Ωp ∼ 40 km s−1 kpc−1, while Zimmer et al. (2004) determined Ωp = 38 ± 7 km s−1 kpc−1 using the Tremaine-Weinberg method. By running collisional models for cloud dynamics under a given spiral potential, Garc´ıa-Burillo et al. (1993) found Ωp ∼ 27 km s−1 kpc−1 for the best fit to the observed morphologies of the CO arms in M51. All of these works were based on the premise that the arm pattern speed is a constant with radius. However, our numerical results show that the pattern speed of tidal arms depends on the radius. In the case of model A2, Ωp is a decreasing function of radius, varying when the arms are strongest from ∼ 20 km s−1 kpc−1 at the ILR to ∼ 10 km s−1 kpc−1 at the outer parts, and at later time converging to the Ω− κ/2 curve. A similar trend was obtained by Salo & Laurikainen (2000b) who ran more realistic encounter models (with a star-only disk) for the M51 system and found that Ωp is close to the Ω− κ/2 curve for a range of radii where the spiral arms are strong. Although much remains uncertain regarding the effects of the cold gaseous component and rotation curve, these results suggest that tidally-driven arms may have a pattern speed that varies with radius in real spiral galaxies. An age distribution of star clusters in M51 shows a narrow peak at 4 − 10 Myrs and a broad peak at 100 − 400 Myrs (Lee et al. 2005), indicating active star formation at these epoches. This enhanced star formation is most likely due to strong spiral arms induced by the tidal interactions with the companion NGC 5195. Since it takes about ∼ 100− 200 Myrs for the spiral arms in our models A1 and A2 to attain a substantial amplitude, say F = 10%, after the perturber passes the pericenter, this implies that the closest passages of NGC 5195 might have occurred ∼ 100 − 200 Myr and ∼ 200 − 600 Myrs ago. Salo & Laurikainen (2000a) proposed two encounter models for the M51 system: a near-parabolic, single-passage orbit occurred 400–500 Myrs ago and a bound double-passage orbit having taken place 400– – 22 – 500 Myrs and 50–100 Myrs ago. Considering the delay between the pericenter passage and the development of strong arms, the cluster age distribution appears to be more consistent with the double-passage scenario, although it is uncertain what effects the second passage will make on the pre-existing arms generated at the first passage. It is well known from the seminal paper of Toomre & Toomre (1972) that tidal inter- actions distort the outer parts of a galactic disk and create a tidal bridge extending toward the perturber as well as a narrow tail at the opposite side. They noted a fraction of the disk material is stripped and transferred through the bridge to the perturber. In this work, we further show that the bridge is in fact a transient pattern constructed by bound particles whose orbits are strongly locked to the perturber. As these particles follow galactic rotation, they are pulled out toward the perturber and then move radially inward at the leading edge, making the bridge rather sharp. By mapping the final to initial particle positions under an impulse approximation, Donner et al. (1991) showed that the sharp boundary of a tidal bridge corresponds to the loci (caustics) of zero Jacobian of the mapping where the orbits of neighboring particles come very close together. Indeed, Figure 4 shows that the leading edge has a large velocity dispersion, consistent with the Liouville theorem that dictates the conservation of the particle density in the phase space. Unlike a bridge, a tail at the opposite side is a material arm resulting from the overlap- ping of near-side particles with far-side particles in the extended parts of the disk. Conse- quently, the tail forms later than the bridge by about a half orbital time, consistent with the results of Donner et al. (1991) and Byrd & Howard (1992). Our experiments show that the formation time and pitch angle of a tail are well correlated with the tidal strength parameter S. While we employed simple models for tidal interactions and limited our simulations to the cases with S < 0.3, our results appear to be applicable to models with quite strong tidal perturbations as well. In simulations of merger encounters, for example, Barnes (1992) ran self-consistent models consisting of a live halo/bulge and a disk with both stars and gas. One of his models considered interactions between equal-mass disk galaxies, in which one disk passes directly through the other with the pericenter distance Rperi/Rg = 0.5, corresponding to S = 1.48. Figure 3 of Barnes (1992) shows that the tail in this model becomes strongest at t ≈ 1.25, corresponding in our units to ttail ≈ 0.053 after the pericenter passage, and has a logarithmic shape with tan itail ≈ 0.83, which are remarkably similar to the extrapolation of our results in §3.2 that yield ttail ≈ 0.057 and tan itail ≈ 0.81. Through a comprehensive survey of the parameter space, Toomre & Toomre (1972) found that tail shape is insensitive to the orbital eccentricity e for 0.6 ≤ e ≤ 1 as long as the inclination of the orbit is not so large (see also Barnes 1998), which is also consistent with our result that tan itail is weakly dependent on S. – 23 – Numerical studies on tidal encounters often report the formation of double arm structure at the opposite side to the perturber (e.g., Sundin 1989; Elmegreen et al. 1991; Donner et al. 1991). Our simulations also exhibit such double features (see, e.g., t = 0.3 frame of Fig. 1) which come out as the tidal tail decouples from the spiral arms that, because of the smooth alignment with the former, are not readily discernible at t = 0.2. Elmegreen et al. (1991) found that the lagging arm forms by gathering particles streaming away from the near side and soon merges with the leading arm. This might be a consequence of the zero velocity dispersion in their unperturbed disk since the ratio of the velocity impulse due to tidal torque to the initial random velocity is too large to set up well-defined spiral arms in the disks of their models. Elmegreen et al. (1991) also found that a prograde, in-plane encounter produces a “ocular” galaxy with oval-shaped, sharp boundaries, provided S > 0.019. A similar structure can be seen in the t = 0.2 panel of Figure 1, although the boundaries in our models are less sharp since, as they noted, the formation of ocular shape requires the injected energy from the perturber to be much larger than the kinetic energy in random particle motions. We are grateful to an anonymous referee for stimulating suggestions, and to L. Hernquist, N. Hwang, M. G. Lee, and E. C. Ostriker for helpful discussion. This work was supported in part by KASI (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) through a grant 2004-1-120- 01-5401. J. K. was supported in part by KOSEF through the Astrophysical Research Center for the Structure and Evolution of Cosmos and the grant of the basic research program R01- 2007-000-20196-0. The authors would like to acknowledge the computational support from KISTI Supercomputing Center under KSC-2007-S00-1007. A. Galaxy Model In this Appendix we describe the model galaxy we use for tidal encounter experiments. The galaxy consists a rigid halo/bulge and a live stellar disk. For a fixed spherical halo, we adopt a truncated logarithmic potential Φh(r) =(cid:26) 1 0 log (r2 2v2 −GMh(rtr)/r c + r2) + constant for r ≤ rtr for r > rtr (A1) where r is the three-dimensional distance from the halo center, rc is the halo core radius, rtr is the truncation radius, and v0 is the constant rotation velocity the disk would have at large r if the halo were not truncated (e.g., Lee et al.. 1999). The corresponding halo mass distribution is Mh(r) = v2 c + r2)] for r < rtr and Mh(r) = Mh(rtr) for r > rtr. 0r2 The constant in equation (A1) should equal −v2 tr) to make the potential continuous at r = rtr. For the simulations presented in this paper, we take tr) − 1 0r3/[G(r2 0 log(r2 c + r2 tr/(r2 c + r2 2v2 – 24 – rc = 7.5 kpc, rtr = 25 kpc, v0 = 220 km s−1, corresponding to Mh(rtr) = 2.58 × 1011 M⊙. A spherical bulge is modeled by a Plummer potential Φb(r) = − GMb √r2 + a2 , (A2) with the scale radius a = 0.23 kpc and the total bulge mass Mb = 1.0 × 1010 M⊙. Although stars in real galactic disks are distributed with a finite vertical thickness, for example, amounting to ∼ 330 pc in the solar neighborhood (e.g., Chen et al. 2001; Karaali et al. 2004), we impose an infinitesimally-thin stellar disk by setting the vertical co- ordinates and velocities equal to zero throughout the simulations. For the radial distribution of stellar surface density, we adopt an exponential form Σd(R) = Σ0 exp(−R/Rd), (A3) where R is the galactocentric radius in the disk, Rd is the disk scale length, and Σ0 is the surface density at the galaxy center. The total disk mass is Md = 2πΣ0R2 d. The gravitational potential of the disk is given by Φd(R) = −(GMd/Rd) RhI0( R)K1( R) − I1( R)K0( R)i , (A4) where In and Kn represent modified Bessel functions of the first and second kinds, respec- tively, and R ≡ R/2Rd (see e.g., Binney & Tremaine 1987). We take Rd = 3.4 kpc and Σ0 = 711 M⊙ pc−2, corresponding to Md = 5.2 × 1010 M⊙. To obtain the equilibrium velocity distribution of disk particles under the total gravita- tional potential Φtot = Φh + Φb + Φd, we follow a method suggested by Hernquist (1993) and Quinn et al. (1993). We first assume that the radial and azimuthal components, vR and vφ, of particle velocities obey initially the Schwarzschild distribution function f (vR, vφ, R) = Σd 2πσRσφ exp"− v2 R R − 2σ2 (vφ − ¯vφ)2 2σ2 φ #, (A5) where σR and σφ are the radial and azimuthal velocity dispersions, respectively (e.g., Toomre 1964). The mean azimuthal streaming velocity ¯vφ differs from the circular velocity vc deter- mined solely from the total gravitational potential as v2 c (R) = −dΦtot/d ln R. In the local approximation in which Σd, σR, and σφ are assumed to vary slowly with R, one can show that σR and σφ are related to each other through σ2 φ/σ2 R = κ2/4Ω2, (A6) – 25 – where Ω ≡ vc/R is the local rotational angular velocity and κ2 ≡ 4Ω2 + dΩ2/d ln R is the square of the local epicycle frequency (e.g., Binney & Tremaine 1987). Then, the usual Jeans equation in the radial direction for an equilibrium disk leads to φ − v2 ¯v2 c = σ2 R(cid:18)1 − κ2 4Ω2 − 2 R Rd(cid:19) (A7) (Barnes 1992; Hernquist 1993). Finally, we express the radial velocity dispersion σR in terms of the Toomre stability parameter Q = κσR 3.36GΣd , (A8) which determines local gravitational stability of a razor-thin disk to axisymmetric perturba- tions. We adopt a fixed value of Q = 2 everywhere initially. This value of Q corresponds roughly to solar neighborhood conditions with κ = 36 km s−1 kpc−1, σR = 30 km s−1 (Binney & Tremaine 1987), and Σd = 35 M⊙ pc−2 (Kuijken & Gilmore 1989), and is large enough to make swing amplification of non-axisymmetric disturbances inefficient. This pre- cludes the possibility of spiral arms driven spontaneously by the stellar self-gravity (e.g., Sellwood & Carlberg 1984; Bertin et al. 1989b). Figure 15 plots the circular velocity vc(R) and the mean rotational velocity ¯vφ(R) of our model galaxy as solid and dotted lines, respectively. Also shown as dashed lines are the separate contributions to vc from halo, bulge, and disk, which have a mass ratio of Mh : Mb : Md = 0.81 : 0.03 : 0.16 inside R = 25 kpc. It is apparent that ¯vφ is usually smaller than vc, indicating that stars, on average, lag behind a circular orbit at the same galactocentric radius, a phenomenon known as asymmetric drift. B. Initial Disk Setup We initialize the exponential stellar disk (eq. [A3]) by distributing N=514,000 equal- mass particles and place it under the combined halo and bulge potential (eqs. [A1] and [A2]). Strictly speaking, the model disk constructed in this way is not in perfect equilibrium because equations (A5) and (A7) hold true only in a local sense, that is, only when the gravitational potential and the stellar velocity dispersions do not vary much with radius (e.g., Sellwood 1985). In addition, when the disk is allowed to evolve, any non-axisymmetric modes that grow may interact with particles, feeding them with random kinetic energy. Two-body interactions of particles tending to heat the disk are not completely negligible, either. All of these may cause the disk structure to deviate considerably from the desired one even before undergoing tidal encounters. – 26 – To obtain a disk configuration representing a dynamically well-relaxed, global equilib- rium, we evolve our model galaxy in isolation for two Gyrs. Figure 16 displays snapshots of particle distributions from the isolated disk evolution. The disk is rotating in the counter- clockwise direction and time is expressed in units of Gyr. Other than weak non-axisymmetric, trailing structures seen at its outskirts, the disk does not suffer from dramatic morphological changes. This implies that the disk is globally stable, a consequence of the fact that, when Q ∼ 2, the growth of perturbations by swing amplification and other instabilities is quite mild (Toomre 1981; Sellwood 1989). No additional perturbation from the rigid halo and bulge also helps to keep the disk featureless (Hernquist 1993). potential) varies rapidly with radius, rendering the local approximation invalid there (e.g., Figure 17 shows the radial distributions of various physical quantities averaged over the azimuthal direction at t = 0, 1, and 2 Gyrs. While ¯vφ and σR change promptly (within less than 0.1 Gyr) from the initial profiles, Σd remains almost unchanged. The changes in σR and Q are largest at R <∼ 5 kpc where the circular velocity (hence the total gravitational Sellwood 1985). The small increases of σR at R >∼ 10 kpc from the initial values are likely caused by mild swing amplification. Except the slight variations of σR near the center, the changes of the disk properties between 1 and 2 Gyrs are practically negligible, indicating that at late time the disk is in a sufficiently well-relaxed, new equilibrium. C. Impulse Approximation In the absence of tidal perturbations, the motions of individual disk particles are in general a superposition of the radial oscillations with epicycle frequency κ around their guiding centers and the circular oscillations of the guiding centers about the disk center. The dispersion δR in the epicycle amplitudes is related to the radial velocity dispersion through δR = σR/κ. Tidal perturbations are able to enhance the epicycle amplitudes for particles whose orbital periods are not so small compared with the duration of a tidal encounter. Using an impulse approximation, one can estimate δR of disk particles subject to tidal perturbations. Let us assume that the tidal forcing is applied impulsively near the pericenter during the time interval of Rperi/vp. Then, the increment ∆vR in the radial velocities of particles at radius R0 is given approximately by ∆vR = 2GMpR0 vpR2 peri , (C1) where vp = [2G(Mg + Mp)/Rperi]1/2 is the orbital velocity of the perturber at the pericenter (e.g., Binney & Tremaine 1987). Assuming that the kinetic energy associated with ∆vR is – 27 – absorbed into the epicycle motions, one obtains δR = (σ2 R + ∆v2 R)1/2/κ (C2) as a measure of the mean radial excursion of disk particles under the influence of tidal perturbations. Figure 3 plots as thin curves δR from equations (C1) and (C2) with differing Mp corresponding to models A2, B2, and C2, while the thick curve draws σR/κ. Adams, F. C., Ruden, S. P., & Shu, F. H. 1989, ApJ, 347, 959 REFERENCES Balbus, S. A. 1988, ApJ, 324, 60 (B88) Barnes, J. 1988, ApJ, 331, 699 Barnes, J. 1992, ApJ, 393, 484 Barnes, J. 1998, in Galaxies: Interactions and Induced Star Formation eds. D. Friedli, L. Martinet, & D. Pfenniger (Springer: Heidelberg), 275 Barnes, J., & Hernquist, L. 1992, Nature, 360, 715 Barnes, J., & Hernquist, L. 1992, ApJ, 471, 115 Barnes, J., & Hut, P. 1986, Nature, 324, 446 Bertin, G., & Lin, C. C. 1996, Spiral Structure in Galaxies: A Density Wave Theory (Cam- bridge: MIT Press) Bertin, G., Lin, C. C., Lowe, S. A., & Thurstans, R. P. 1989a, ApJ, 338, 78 Bertin, G., Lin, C. C., Lowe, S. A., & Thurstans, R. P. 1989b, ApJ, 338, 104 Binney, J. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 230, Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies, ed. J. G. Funes & E. M. Corsini (San Francisco: ASP) 63 Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press) Byrd, G. G., & Howard, S. 1992, AJ, 103, 1089 Chen, B., Stoughton, C., Smith, A. et al. 2001, ApJ, 553, 184 Donner, K. J., Engstrom, S., & Sundelius, B. 1991, A&A, 252, 571 – 28 – Dubinski, J., Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1996, ApJ, 462, 576 Durrell, P. R., Mihos, J. C., Feldmeier, J. J., Jacoby, G. H., & Ciardullo, R. 2003, ApJ, 582, 170 Elmegreen, D. M., & Elmegreen, B. G. 1982, MNRAS, 201, 1021 Elmegreen, D. M., & Elmegreen, B. G. 1987, ApJ, 314, 3 Elmegreen, D. M., Sundin, M., Elmegreen, B. G., & Sundelius, B. 1991, A&A, 244, 52 Elmegreen, B. G. 1994, ApJ, 433, 39 Elmegreen, B. G. 1995, in The 7th Guo Shoujing Summer School on Astrophysics: Molecular Clouds and Star Formation, eds. C. Yuan & Hunhan You (Singapore:World Scientific), 149 Elmegreen, B. G., & Elmegreen, D. M. 1983, MNRAS, 203, 31 Elmegreen, B. G., Elmegreen, D. M., & Seiden, P. E. 1989, ApJ, 602 Elmegreen, B. G., Kaufman, M., & Thomasson, M. 1993, ApJ, 412, 90 Garc´ıa-Burillo, S., Combes, F., & Gerin, M. 1993, A&A, 274, 148 Gerin, M., Combes, F., & Athanassoula, E. 1990, A&A, 230, 37 Goldreich, P., & Lynden-Bell, D. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 125 Hernquist, L. 1990, Dynamics and Interactions of Galaxies, ed. R. Wielen (Berlin: Springer), 108 Hernquist, L. 1993, ApJS, 86, 389 Howard, S., & Byrd, G. G. 1990, AJ, 99, 1798 Julian, W. H., & Toomre, A. 1966, ApJ, 146, 810 Karaali, S., Bilir, S., & Hamzaoglu, E. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 307 Kennicutt, R. 1981, AJ, 86, 1847 Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C. et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 871 Kim, W.-T., & Ostriker, E. C. 2002, ApJ, 570, 132 – 29 – Kim, W.-T., & Ostriker, E. C. 2006, ApJ, 646, 213 Kormendy, J., & Norman, C. A. 1979, ApJ, 233, 539 Kuijken, K., & Gilmore, G. 1989, MNRAS, 239, 605 La Vigne, M. A., Vogel, S. N., & Ostriker, E. C. 2006, ApJ, 650, 818 Lee, C. W., Lee, H. M., Ann, H. B., & Kwon, K. H. 1999, ApJ, 513, 242 Lee, M. G., Chandar, R., & Whitmore, B. C. 2005, AJ, 130, 2128 Lin, C. C., & Shu, F. H. 1964, ApJ, 140, 646 Lin, C. C., & Shu, F. H. 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 55, 229 Lin, C. C., Yuan, C., & Shu, F. H. 1969, ApJ, 155, 721 McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 565 Noguchi, M. 1987, MNRAS, 228, 635 Ostriker, E. C., Shu, F. H., & Adams, F. C. 1992, ApJ, 399, 192 Patsis, P. A., H´eraudeau, Ph., & Grosbøl, P. 2001, A&A, 370, 875 Pfleiderer, J. 1963, ZAp, 58, 12 Press, W. H., & Teukolsky, S. A. 1977, ApJ, 213, 183 Rand, R. J. 1993, ApJ, 410, 68 Rix, H.-W., & Rieke, M. J. 1993, ApJ, 418, 123 Rix, H.-W., & Zaritsky, D. 1995, ApJ, 447, 82 Roberts, W. W. 1969, ApJ, 158, 123 Rots, A. H., Bosman, A., van der Hulst, J. M., Athanassoula, E., & Crane, P. C. 1990, AJ, 100, 387 Rybicki, G. B. 1971, Ap&SS, 14, 15 Quinn, P. J., Hernquist, L., & Fullagar, D. P. 1993, ApJ, 403, 74 Salo, H., & Laurikainen, E. 1993, ApJ, 410, 586 – 30 – Salo, H., & Laurikainen, E. 2000a, MNRAS, 319, 377 Salo, H., & Laurikainen, E. 2000b, MNRAS, 319, 393 Scoville, N. Z., Polletta, M., Ewald, S., Stolovy, S. R., Thompson, R., & Rieke, M. 2001, AJ, 112, 3017 Seigar, M. S., Block, D. L., Puerari, I., Chorney, N. E., & James, P. A. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1065 Seigar, M. S., Bullock, J. S., Barth, A. J., & Ho, L. C. 2006, ApJ, 645, 1012 Sellwood, J. A. 1985, MNRAS, 217, 127 Sellwood, J. A. 1989, in Dynamics of Astrophysical Disks, 155, ed. J. A. Sellwood (Cambridge Univ. Press), 155 Sellwood, J. A., & Carlberg, R. G. 1984, ApJ, 282, 61 Sellwood, J. A., & Athanassoula, E. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 195 Shetty, R., & Ostriker, E. C. 2006, ApJ, 647, 997 Shetty, R., Vogel, S. N., & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1138 Shu, F. H., Milione, V., & Roberts, W. W. 1973, ApJ, 183, 819 Smith, J., Gehrz, R. D., Grasdalen, G. L., Hackwell, J. A., Dietz, R. D., & Friedman, S. D. 1990, ApJ, 362, 455 Springel, V., Yoshida, N., & White, S. D. M. 2001, New Astronomy, 6, 79 Sundelius, B., Thomasson, M., Valtonen, M. J., & Byrd, G. G. 1987, A&A, 174, 67 Sundin, M. 1989, in Dynamics of Astrophysical Discs, ed. J. A. Sellwood (Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge), 215 Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Toomre, A. 1969, ApJ, 158, 899 Toomre, A. 1981, in Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies, eds. S. M. Fall & D. Lynden-Bell (Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press), 111 Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623 – 31 – Tremaine, S., & Weinberg, M. D. 1984, ApJ, 282, L5 Vandervoort, P. O. 1971, ApJ, 166, 37 Vogel, S. N., Kulkarni, S. R., & Scoville, N. Z. 1988, Nature, 334, 402 Wetzstein, M., Naab, T., & Burkert, A. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 805 White, R. L. 1988, ApJ, 330, 26 Willner, S. P., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 222 Woodward, P. R. 1975, ApJ, 195, 61 Zimmer, P., Rand, R. J., McGraw, J. T. 2004, ApJ, 607, 285 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. Table 1. Summary of model parameters and simulation results Modela (1) Mp/Mg (2) Rperi(kpc) (3) A1 A2 A2* A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 25 35 35 45 25 35 45 25 35 45 Sb (4) 0.250 0.151 0.151 0.103 0.135 0.081 0.056 0.070 0.043 0.029 Mcap/Md (5) c (%) Mesc/Md (6) d (%) 4.99 1.99 1.84 0.46 1.95 0.79 0.07 0.73 0.22 · · · 1.97 0.08 0.08 0.006 1.33 0.03 0.002 0.67 0.01 · · · ttail (7) 0.14 0.18 0.19 0.25 0.18 0.24 · · · · · · · · · · · · tan itail (8) 0.546 0.511 0.707 0.499 0.457 0.411 · · · · · · · · · · · · Σtail/Σ20 e (9) 29.2 22.0 11.6 15.3 17.4 13.4 · · · · · · · · · · · · Fmax (10) 0.22 0.18 0.11 0.09 0.17 0.10 0.06 0.11 0.06 0.04 aModel A2* is identical to model A2 except that the former neglects the self-gravity of the perturbed density. bS ≡ (Mp/Mg)(Rg /Rperi)3(∆T /T ) = 0.738(Mp/Mg)(Rg /Rp)3/2[1 + (Mp/Mg)]−1/2 is the dimensionless tidal strength parameter. cMcap is the total mass of the captured particles by the perturbing companion. dMesc is the total mass of the non-captured, escaping particles from the whole system. eΣ20 = Σd(20 kpc) is the surface density of the initial unperturbed disk at R = 20 kpc. – 3 2 – – 33 – Fig. 1.— Snapshots of the particle distributions in model A2 in the x-y plane. Only 20% of the particles are shown to reduce crowding. The elapsed time is shown at the upper right corner of each panel. The arrow and the associated number give the direction and distance (in kpc) to the perturber that passes through the pericenter (x, y)=(35 kpc, 0) at t = 0 in the counterclockwise direction. See text for details. – 34 – Fig. 2.— Distributions of the perturbed surface density δΣ/Σ of model A2 in the polar coordinates. When t <∼ 0.2, δΣ is dominated by the extended-disk structures such as bridge and tail at R >∼ 15 kpc, which become loose and spread widely after t ∼ 0.3. The spiral arms at R <∼ 15 kpc appear straight in the φ − ln R plane, with a slope becoming progressively smaller with time. – 35 – Fig. 3.— Dispersions in the radial departures of particles from the initial locations over the course of tidal interactions. Various symbols indicate the numerical results of models A2, B2, and C2. The thin solid, dotted, dashed curves draw the analytic estimates (eq. [C2]) based on the impulse approximation. The thick solid line corresponds to the unperturbed disk in which δR is purely due to the epicycle orbits associated with the initial velocity dispersions. – 36 – Fig. 4.— Azimuthal variations of the radial (vR) and azimuthal (vφ) velocities of the particles at R = 20 kpc in model A2 at early epochs of tidal interactions. The azimuthal phase in the abscissa is repeated for clarity. In each panel, vertical dotted lines mark the phase angles of the perturber. – 37 – Fig. 5.— Spatial distributions of selected particles in model A2 at some time epochs when the perturber is close to the pericenter. Blue, green, yellow, orange, and red colors represent the particles originally located in annuli with R0 = 6 − 7, 10 − 11, 14 − 15, 18 − 20, and 22− 24 kpc, respectively. The black circle in each panel has a radius of 20 kpc and the arrow indicates the direction to the perturber. The black and cyan dots denote the groups of the near-side and far-side particles, respectively, in the R0 = 22 − 24 kpc ring, which merge at the far side to form a tail at t = 0.2. – 38 – Fig. 6.— Dependences on the the tidal strength parameter S of the formation epoch ttail, the pitch angle itail at t = ttail, and the surface density Σtail at R = 20 kpc and t = ttail of tidal tails in various models. The dotted line in each panel gives the best fit to the numerical results: ttail = 0.07S −0.54, tan itail = 0.75S0.22, and Σtail/Σ20 = 79.0S0.72, where Σ20 denotes the surface density of the initial disk at R = 20 kpc. – 39 – Fig. 7.— Close-up views of the distributions of stellar surface density in model A2, with the color bar labeling (Σ/104 M⊙ pc−2)1/2. The two-armed spiral density waves excited by the tidal forcing achieve the maximum strength at t ∼ 0.3, and then gradually weaken. – 40 – Fig. 8.— Evolution of the Fourier amplitudes with wavenumber p, defined by equation (4), of the m = 2 logarithmic spirals in model A2. The modal growth is due to swing amplification at early time (t <∼ 0.04), which becomes soon dominated by the kinematic overlapping of the perturbed epicycle orbits. – 41 – Fig. 9.— Temporal changes of the pitch angle of the spiral arms located in the R = 5 − 10, 8.0− 8.5, 8− 13, and 11− 16 kpc regions for model A2, A2, B2, and C2, respectively. In the self-gravitating models A2, B2, and C2, the pitch angle deceases as tan i ∝ t−0.5∼−0.6, with weaker arms decaying slightly more rapidly, whereas tan i ∝ t−1 for the non-self-gravitating model A2. – 42 – Fig. 10.— Azimuthal distributions of the perturbed density δΣ (top) as black curves and the radial velocity vR (middle) and perturbed circular velocity δvφ = vφ − ¯vφ (bottom) as dots in the disk at R = 10 kpc when t = 0.4 for model A2 (left) and when t = 0.5 for model C2 (right). Note that the vertical scales are different from the left and right panels. In the top panels, the red lines give the m = 2 Fourier modes δΣm=2 of the perturbed density. In the middle and bottom panels, the blue curves give the average values of vR and δvφ, while the red curves plot the predictions of the linear density wave theory corresponding to δΣm=2. – 43 – Fig. 11.— Arm strength F averaged over the time interval ∆t = 0.4 centered at the time of the peak strength as a function of radius. The induced spiral arms for stronger encounter models A1, A2, B1, and C1 peak at Rmax ∼ 5 − 10 kpc, while weaker encounter models B3, C2, and C3 produce spiral arms at Rmax ∼ 11 − 16 kpc. – 44 – Fig. 12.— Time evolution of the arm strength F averaged over 5 kpc <∼ R <∼ 10 kpc for models A1, A2, B1, and C1, over 8 kpc <∼ R <∼ 13 kpc for models A2, A3 and B2, and over 11 kpc <∼ R <∼ 16 kpc for models B3, C2, and C3. In each self-gravitating model, it takes about one or two rotational periods at R = Rmax for the arms to reach the maximum value. After the peak, F decays as ∼ exp(−t/1 Gyr) due largely to large dispersions in the particle velocities. Fluctuations of F at t >∼ 1 arise as the particles once pertaining to the bridge and tail move in and out the arms. Without disk heating, the decay of the spiral arms in the non-self-gravitating model A2 is quite slow. – 45 – Fig. 13.— Dependence of the peak arm strength Fmax on S. The dotted line Fmax = 0.95S0.86 is the best fit to our numerical results. – 46 – Fig. 14.— Contours of the cross correlation of the normalized surface density in the radius – frequency domain for models A2 (left) and A2* (right). Smooth curves draw Ω (solid ) and Ω ± κ/2 (dashed ) from the initial disk rotation. The dotted line in each of the left panels plots the theoretical patten speed calculated from the linear dispersion relation for the background parameters equal to the azimuthally-averaged disk values obtained from the simulation. Nearly constant Ωp ∼ 9.5 km s−1 kpc−1 at R >∼ 17 kpc for t <∼ 0.2 traces the tidal bridge and tail, which instantaneously corotate with the perturber. The loci of the maximum cross correlation for the arms match well with the Ω − κ/2 curve in model A2 for t >∼ 0.6 and in model A2* for t >∼ 0.3. – 47 – Fig. 15.— Circular speed vc(R) (solid ) and mean streaming velocity ¯vφ(R) (dotted ) of our model galaxy as functions of the galactocentric radius R. Contributions to vc from disk, bulge, and halo are plotted as dashed lines. – 48 – Fig. 16.— Evolution of our model disk in isolation. Time is expressed in units of 109 yr. Only 104 particles are plotted to reduce crowding. The disk is rotating in the counterclockwise direction. No notable change in appearance is found, indicating that the disk is globally stable. – 49 – Fig. 17.— Radial distributions of (a) the disk surface density Σd, (b) mean streaming velocity ¯vφ, (c) radial velocity dispersion σR and (d ) Toomre stability parameter Q from an isolated disk evolution at t = 0 (dotted ), 1 Gyr (solid ), and 2 Gyr (dashed ).
astro-ph/0510347	2	0510	2006-04-14T05:27:43	Ly-alpha Radiative Transfer in Cosmological Simulations and Application to a z~8 Emitter	[ "astro-ph" ]	We develop a Ly-alpha radiative transfer (RT) Monte Carlo code for cosmological simulations.High resolution,along with appropriately treated cooling can result in simulated environments with very high optical depths.Thus,solving the Ly-alpha RT problem in cosmological simulations can take an unrealistically long time.For this reason,we develop methods to speed up the Ly-alpha RT.With these accelerating methods,along with the parallelization of the code,we make the problem of Ly-alpha RT in the complex environments of cosmological simulations tractable.We test the RT code against simple Ly-alpha emitter models,and then we apply it to the brightest Ly-alpha emitter of a gasdynamics+N-body Adaptive Refinement Tree (ART) simulation at z~8.We find that recombination rather than cooling radiation Ly-alpha photons is the dominant contribution to the intrinsic Ly-alpha luminosity of the emitter,which is ~4.8x10e43 ergs/s.The size of the emitter is pretty small,making it unresolved for currently available instruments.Its spectrum before adding the Ly-alpha Gunn-Peterson absorption (GP) resembles that of static media,despite some net inward radial peculiar motion.This is because for such high optical depths as those in ART simulations,velocities of order some hundreds km/s are not important.We add the GP in two ways.First we assume no damping wing,corresponding to the situation where the emitter lies within the HII region of a very bright quasar,and second we allow for the damping wing.Including the damping wing leads to a maximum line brightness suppression by roughly a factor of ~62.The line fluxes,even though quite faint for current ground-based telescopes,should be within reach for JWST.	astro-ph	astro-ph	draft version; September 23, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 11/12/01 6 0 0 2 r p A 4 1 2 v 7 4 3 0 1 5 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Ly-α RADIATIVE TRANSFER IN COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS AND APPLICATION TO A z ≃ 8 Ly-α EMITTER Argyro Tasitsiomi1,2 draft version; September 23, 2018 ABSTRACT We develop a Ly-α radiative transfer (RT) Monte Carlo code for cosmological simulations. High res- olution, along with appropriately treated cooling, can result in simulated environments with very high optical depths. Thus, solving the Ly-α RT problem in cosmological simulations can take an unrealisti- cally long time. For this reason, we develop methods to speed up the Ly-α RT. With these accelerating methods, along with the parallelization of the code, we make the problem of Ly-α RT in the complex environments of cosmological simulations tractable. We test the RT code against simple Ly-α emitter models, and then we apply it to the brightest Ly-α emitter of a gasdynamics+N-body Adaptive Refine- ment Tree (ART) simulation at z ≃ 8. We find that recombination rather than cooling radiation Ly-α photons is the dominant contribution to the intrinsic Ly-α luminosity of the emitter, which is ≃ 4.8×1043 ergs/s. The size of the emitter is pretty small, making it unresolved for currently available instruments. Its spectrum before adding the Ly-α Gunn-Peterson absorption (GP) resembles that of static media, despite some net inward radial peculiar motion. This is because for such high optical depths as those in ART simulations, velocities of order some hundreds km/s are not important. We add the GP in two ways. First we assume no damping wing, corresponding to the situation where the emitter lies within the HII region of a very bright quasar, and second we allow for the damping wing. Including the damping wing leads to a maximum line brightness suppression by roughly a factor of ∼ 62. The line fluxes, even though quite faint for current ground-based telescopes, should be within reach for JWST. Subject headings: cosmology: theory -- diffuse radiation -- galaxies: formation -- intergalactic medium -- radiative transfer -- line: formation -- radiative transfer -- resonant -- polarization 1. introduction Since the classic paper by Partridge & Peebles (1967), intense observational efforts have focused on the search for Ly-α emitters at high redshifts. Although most of the early attempts ended in negative results before the mid 1990s, recent observational advances enabled us to identify star forming galaxies at ever increasing redshifts. Currently, several observational projects, such as LALA (e.g., Rhoads et al. 2003), CADIS (e.g., Maier 2002), the Subaru Deep Field Project (e.g., Taniguchi et al. 2005), etc., spectroscopic surveys that use lensing magnification from clusters (e.g., Santos et al. 2003), surveys that com- bine Subaru (e.g., Hu et al. 2004) or HST/ACS/NICMOS imaging (e.g., Stanway et al. 2004; Dickinson et al. 2004, for the GOODS survey) with Keck spectroscopy, etc., focus on finding high-z starforming galaxies. Surveys currently reach up to z ≃ 7− 8 (e.g., see Bouwens et al. 2004, for re- cent results from the NICMOS observations of the HUDF) and will likely reach higher redshifts in the coming years (e.g., via JWST). The hydrogen Ly-α line is a very promising way to probe the high-redshift universe. Besides yielding redshifts, the shape, equivalent width and offset of the Ly-α line from other emission/absorption lines potentially convey valu- able information about the geometry, kinematics, and un- derlying stellar population of the host galaxy. Further- more, after escaping the environment of the host galaxy, 1 Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Kavli Institute for Cosmo- logical Physics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 2 Current address: Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences, Prince- ton University, Peyton Hall-Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544; [email protected] Ly-α photons are scattered in the surrounding IGM. The presence or absence of observed Ly-α emission can be used to place constraints on the state of the IGM, useful in con- straining for example the epoch and topology of reioniza- tion. Because of the numerous factors that contribute to the final Ly-α emission, the interpretation of such features can be very complex. To use all the currently available and future observations in the most effective way possi- ble we need to improve our theoretical understanding of Ly-α emission from high-redshift objects. To this end we develop a general Ly-α radiative transfer (RT) scheme for cosmological simulations. As an example, we apply the RT scheme to gasdynamics+N-body Adaptive Refinement Tree (ART; Kravtsov 2003) simulations of galaxy forma- tion. There are quite a few studies of Ly-α emission from high-z objects (e.g., Gould & Weinberg 1996; Haiman & Spaans 1999; Loeb & Rybicki 1999; Ahn et al. 2001, 2002; Zheng & Miralda-Escud´e 2002; Santos 2004; Dijkstra et al. 2005a,b). The problem these studies address is highly complex and has many unknowns. Inevitably, most of these studies had to make at some point some simplify- ing assumptions. Usually, a high degree of symmetry for the emitting source, and its density, temperature, and ve- locity field is assumed. The same is the case with respect to the processes that are responsible for the production of Ly-α photons. On the other hand, cosmological simula- tions hopefully capture most of the basic elements, lifting thus practical constraints that existed in these previous studies. There is a small number of related studies using cos- mological simulations (Fardal et al. 2001; Furlanetto et al. 2003; Barton et al. 2004; Furlanetto et al. 2005; Cantalupo 1 2 TASITSIOMI et al. 2005; Delliou et al. 2005a,b). Some of these simula- tions are lacking crucial processes such as radiative cooling of the gas and consistent RT, the various sources of Ly-α photons, and/or sufficient resolution in order to resolve the clumpiness of the gas. Furthermore, most of these studies do not perform Ly-α RT, but rather they assume that the observer sees whatever is being emitted initially, simply modified by e−τ with τ the optical depth for Ly-α scat- tering due to neutral hydrogen between the emission point and the observer. Namely, in most cases Ly-α spectra from simulations are treated as absorption spectra when, in real- ity, they are scattering spectra (see, e.g., Gnedin & Prada 2004). For gas well outside the source of emission this is an appropriate approximation since scattering off the direction of viewing removes the photons that could be observed and thus appears as effective absorption. This is no longer true for the source of emission itself, since photons that were originally emitted in directions differ- ent from the direction of observation may scatter into this direction. It is important that the difficulty of implementing a Ly- α RT scheme for cosmological simulations become clear. The classical problem of resonance RT, relevant to a wide range of applications from planetary atmospheres to ac- cretion disks, has been quite extensively studied in the lit- erature (e.g., Zanstra 1949; Hummer 1962; Auer 1968; Av- ery & House 1968; Adams 1972; Harrington 1973; Neufeld 1990; Ahn et al. 2001, 2002). However, analytical solu- tions derived in the past are applicable only to certain specific conditions. On the other hand, the slow conver- gence of the numerical techniques used limited the nu- merical studies at optical thicknesses that are relatively low compared to those encountered in high-redshift galax- ies (and cosmological simulations of high-redshift galaxies, as we will show). Thus, unlike previous studies, most of which focused on the classical problem of resonant RT in a semi-infinite slab, in cosmological simulations one has to solve simultaneously thousands or even millions of these problems.3Furthermore, having in mind existing and fu- ture cosmological simulations that can achieve sufficiently high resolution to resolve the gas clumpiness and that treat cooling appropriately, we anticipate column densities that are orders of magnitude higher than those found in lower resolution simulations without cooling. In this case we need a RT algorithm much faster than the more standard direct Monte Carlo approach [which, however, is our start- ing point] of previous studies. Thus, we must develop RT acceleration methods that, along with the highly parallel nature of the RT problem that enables us to make use of many parallel machines, can make the Ly-α RT problem tractable. The paper is organized as follows. In § 2 we discuss the RT scheme. More specifically, in § 2.1 we present the ba- sic Monte Carlo algorithm, in § 2.2 we present tests of the basic algorithm, in § 2.3 we discuss the acceleration meth- ods we use to speed up the RT, and in § 2.4 we present the method images and spectra are constructed. In § 3 we discuss in detail an application of the Ly-α RT code to ART simulations. More specifically, in § 3.1 we briefly give 3 For example, in the case of Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) codes, each time a photon enters a simulation cell one has the equiv- alent of a new slab RT problem. some information about the ART simulations. In § 3.2 we discuss the intrinsic Ly-α emission of the specific simu- lated Ly-α emitter we focus on. In § 3.3 we present results on the emitter before RT. In § 3.4 we discuss results after performing the RT, and with/without the Gunn-Peterson (GP) absorption, as well as with/without the red damp- ing wing of the GP absorption. In § 4 we discuss and summarize our results and conclusions. 2. the Ly-α radiative transfer 2.1. The basic Monte Carlo code The following discussion assumes in various places a cell structure for the simulation outputs, as is inherently the case in AMR codes. However, the Ly-α RT code we dis- cuss is applicable to outputs from all kinds of cosmological simulation codes, since one can always create an effective mesh by interpolating the values of the various physical parameters. The size of the mesh cell can be motivated by resolution related scales (e.g., the softening scale, or larger if convergence tests with respect to the Ly-α RT justify a larger scale). Thus, in what follows we refer to simulation cells either the direct output of the cosmological simula- tion code has a cell structure or not. The initial emission characteristics (simulation cell, fre- quency, etc.) of each photon depend on the specific phys- ical conditions, thus we defer this discussion for §3 where an application to a Ly-α emitter produced in ART cos- mological simulations is presented. After determining the initial characteristics for each photon, we follow a series of scatterings up to a certain scale where the detailed RT stops. This scale is to be determined via a convergence study. In this subsection we describe the basic steps of the algorithm. 2.1.1. Propagating the photon For every scattering we generate the optical depth, which determines the spatial displacement of the photon, by sam- pling the probability distribution function e−τ (1) with R a uniformly distributed random number. This op- tical depth is equal to τ = − ln(R) , τ = l Z0 ∞ Z−∞ dldupσL(ν(1−up/c))r mp 2πkBT nHI exp − mpu2 p 2kBT! , (2) with nHI the number density of neutral hydrogen. The function σL is the scattering cross section of Ly-α photons as a function of frequency, defined in the rest frame of the hydrogen atom as σL(ν) = f12 πe2 mec ∆νL/2π (ν − ν0)2 + (∆νL/2)2 , (3) where f12 = 0.4162 is the Ly-α oscillator strength, ν0 = 2.466×1015 Hz is the line center frequency, ∆νL = 9.936× 107 Hz is the natural width of the line, and other symbols have their usual meaning. In equation (2) the fact that the photons are encountering atoms with a Maxwellian distri- bution of thermal velocities has been taken into account. Integrating over the distribution of velocities, the resulting cross section in the observer's frame is σ(x) = f12 H(α, x) (4) √πe2 mec∆νD Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 3 where H(α, x) = α π Z ∞ −∞ e−y2 (x − y)2 + α2 dy (5) is the Voigt function, x = (ν − ν0)/∆νD is the relative frequency of the incident photon in the observer's frame with ∆νD = p2kBT /(mpc2)ν0 the Doppler width, and α = ∆νL/2∆νD with ∆νL the natural line width. Assum- ing that σ is independent of l, the optical depth is given by τ = nHI σ(x)l . (6) When applied to cosmological simulations, equation (6) is substituted by a sum of terms similar to the r.h.s. This sum is over the different cells (=different physical condi- tions such as neutral hydrogen density, temperature, etc.) that the photon crosses until it reaches τ and gets scat- tered. For the Voigt function we use the following analytic fit, which is a good approximation to better than 1% for tem- peratures T > 2K (N. Gnedin, personal communication) V (α, ν) ≡ = 1 √π∆νD ∆νD (cid:20)q + 1 H(α, x) = 1 ∆νD φ(x) e−x 1.77245385(cid:21) where x = x2, and q = 0 if z = (x − 0.855)/(x + 3.42) ≤ 0 and (7) (8) α 21 q = z(cid:18)1 + × {0.1117 + z [4.421 + z(−9.207 + 5.674z)]} x (cid:19) π(x + 1) if z > 0. The definition in terms of the function φ(x) is also given since the latter has been used in many previous studies, and we also use it in what follows. If in addition to the thermal motion of the atoms there is bulk motion, such as peculiar or Hubble flow velocities, in equation (4) we use xf = x − (vf z/c)ν0/∆νD, where vf z is the component of the fluid bulk velocity along the direction of the incident photon. In equation (2) the cross section σ becomes l-dependent when Hubble expansion is taken into account. In this case the equation is an integral and does not reduce to the sim- ple algebraic equation (6). To propagate the photon one must solve for the step which is the upper limit of the in- tegral. In the simple examples discussed in §2.2, things are relatively simple even when the Hubble expansion is included, since in these cases there is homogeneity and isothermality and no sum over cells is required. In those cases, Hubble expansion is included as follows: 1.) we make a first guess for l using the Hubble velocity at the current point, 2.) we use as a step for the photon a certain fraction of l, 3.) for a specified tolerance with which we want to achieve τ , we refine the step as necessary. Note that the simple tests of the code presented in §2.2 do not In the actual simulations the include peculiar motions. peculiar velocities rather than the Hubble expansion are dominant on the relevant scales (e.g., for the emitter we focus on, the mean radial component of the peculiar mo- tion dominates over the Hubble expansion up to about 80 physical kpc). In the detailed RT which we perform within such distances, we approximate the subdominant Hubble expansion velocity within a certain cell by the expansion velocity that corresponds to the center of that cell. This is calculated to have a negligible effect on the results. The n = 2 state of atomic hydrogen consists of the 2S1/2, 2P1/2 and 2P3/2 substates, whereas the n = 1 state consists of 1S1/2. According to the electric dipole selec- tion rules, the allowed transitions are 2P1/2 to 1S1/2 and 2P3/2 to 1S1/2, whereas 2S1/2 corresponds to destruction of the initially absorbed Ly-α photon, since this state de- excites through the emission of two continuum photons. The multiplicity of each of these states is 2J + 1. Thus the probabilities for the 2P states the atom can be found in when absorbing the Ly-α photons 2P1/2 : 2P3/2 are 1 : 2. Collisions can potentially cause the 2P → 2S tran- sition in which case the photon gets destroyed. A similar destruction effect can be caused by the existence of dust. Both these destruction mechanisms are briefly discussed in the context of the ART simulations in §3.5.1 and §3.5.2, respectively. Considering the 2P1/2 and 2P3/2 cases sepa- rately, one would have to modify both the Voigt function and the velocity distribution of the scattering atom dis- cussed in the next section (see, e.g., Ahn et al. 2001). However, the level splitting between the two 2P states is small, just 10 GHz. This corresponds to a velocity width of ∼ 1 km/s, much smaller than the width due to ther- mal velocities in media with roughly T > 100 K. In addi- tion, even for lower temperatures, this level splitting is still small for high optical depths. In our case, the thermal, pe- culiar, and Hubble velocities are all more important than the splitting, and combined with the fact that we have high optical depths, we do not make the distinction between the two sublevels. As discussed below, however, the different fine structure levels are taken into account when choos- ing scattering phase functions, important for polarization calculations that we will present in a future paper. 2.1.2. The scattering After determining the point in space where the pho- ton will be scattered next, we choose the thermal velocity components of the scattering atom. In the two directions perpendicular to the direction of the incident photon the components are drawn from a (1-D) Gaussian distribution . The component up of the thermal velocity of the atom along the direction of the incident photon is drawn from the distribution with dispersion equal to q kB T mp f (vp) = a π e−v2 p (x − vp)2 + a2 H−1(a, x) , (9) with vp = up(mp/2kT )1/2. To draw numbers that follow this distribution we use the method of Zheng & Miralda- Escud´e (2002). After each scattering we need to assign a new frequency (in the observer's frame) and direction to the photon. To this end we perform a Lorentz transformation of the fre- quency and direction of the incident photon from the ob- server to the atom rest frame, using the velocity of the atom chosen as described previously. Although the code ignores the level splitting with re- spect to the scattering cross section and the velocity dis- tribution, it takes into account the different phase distribu- tions for core versus wing scatterings, as well as for 2P1/2 4 TASITSIOMI versus 2P3/2 scatterings. For resonant scattering, it is the angular momenta of the three states involved and the mul- tipole order of the emitted radiation that determines the scattering phase function. Hamilton (1940) found that the transition from 2P1/2 gives totally unpolarized photons and is characterized by an isotropic angular distribution function, whereas that from the 2P3/2 state corresponds to a maximum degree of polarization of 3/7 for a 90◦ scat- tering (also see Chandrasekhar 1960). More specifically, the scattering phase function for dipole transition can be written as (Hamilton 1940) W (θ) ∝ 1 + R Q cos2 θ (10) with R/Q the degree of polarization for a 90◦ scattering and equal to R/Q = (J + 1)(2J + 3) 26J 2 − 15J − 1 (11) for the 2P3/2 → 1S1/2 transition since ∆J = −1, ∆j = 1, J = 3/2 according to Hamilton's conventions, and R/Q = (2J − 1)(2J + 3) 12J 2 + 12J + 1 (12) for the 2P1/2 → 1S1/2 transition with ∆J = ∆j = 0, J = 1/2. In both equations, J is the total angular momentum at the excited (n = 2) state. Thus, W (θ) is constant (isotropic) for 2P1/2 as the excited state, whereas it equals (13) with maximum polarization degree of 3/7 at a 90◦ scat- tering. W (θ) ∝ 1 + 3/7 cos2 θ On the other hand, Stenflo (1980) showed that at high frequency shifts (i.e., at the line wings) quantum mechani- cal interference between the two lines acts in such a way as to give a scattering behavior identical to that of a classical oscillator, namely pure Rayleigh scattering. Then the di- rection follows a dipole angular distribution with Rayleigh polarization 100% at 900 scattering, namely W (θ) ∝ 1 + cos2 θ . (14) Lastly, the frequency of the photon before and after scat- tering in the rest frame of the atom differs only by the recoil effect. Hence, ν ν = 1 + hν mpc2 (1 − cos θ) (15) where ν, ν are the frequency of the incident and scattered photon in the atom rest frame, respectively, the latter modified due to the recoil effect. This effect is negligible for the environments produced in the simulations. After determining the new direction and frequency of the scattered photon in the atom's rest frame we trans- form back to the observer's frame, and repeat the whole scattering procedure. 2.2. Testing the basic scheme Here we present some of the tests of the RT code we performed against analytical solutions, as well as other nu- merical results that exist in the literature. In addition to showing the good performance of the code, these tests are presented here as relevant to either Ly-α emitters and/or the way we accelerate the code when applied in cosmolog- ical simulations (see §2.3). 2.2.1. Neufeld (1990) test Neufeld (1990) derived an analytic solution in the limit of large optical depth for a source radiating resonance line photons in a thick, plane-parallel, isothermal semi-infinite slab of uniform density. The analytic emergent spectrum as a function of frequency shift for a midplane source is √6 24 x2 ατ0 1 cosh[(π4/54)0.5(x3 − x3 J(±τ0, x) = i /ατ0)] with x = (ν − ν0)/∆νD, ∆νD = ν0p2kBT /(mpc2) the thermal Doppler width, xi the injection frequency shift (zero for injection at line center), and α the ratio of the natural to two times the thermal Doppler width. The quantity τ0 is the optical depth from midplane to one boundary of the slab at the line center.4 (16) This analytical solution is valid in the very optically thick limit, with the latter being defined according to Neufeld (1990) as τ0 ≥ 103/(√πα). This corresponds to τ0 ≥ 3.8 × 104 approximately for a temperature T=10 K as- sumed in the tests we present here. In deriving equation (16) the scattering was assumed to be isotropic. In ad- dition, it was assumed coherence in the rest frame of the atom, an assumption that makes the solution valid at the low density limit only, as well as approximations under the assumption that wing scatterings dominate were done (hence the solution is valid at high optical depths). Fur- thermore, note that the classical slab problem is indepen- dent of the real size of the slab (all quantities depend on l/l0 with l0 the actual size of the finite dimension). Lastly, for this solution it is assumed that the source has unit strength and is isotropic, namely it emits 1 photon per unit time or 1/4π photons per unit time and steradian. For center-of-line injection frequencies the emerging spec- trum has maximum at x ≃ ±0.88119(α√πτ0)1/3, and an average number of scatterings N ≃ 0.909316√πτ0 (Har- rington 1973, with τ0 in these expressions defined using our conventions rather than Neufeld's). This scaling of the mean number of scatterings with optical depth in the case of resonant-line RT in extremely optically thick me- dia was first explained by Adams (1972), who understood that photons escape the medium after a series of excur- sions to the wings. Before this study it was believed that the number of scatterings scales with τ 2 0 , as would be pre- dicted by plain spatial random walk arguments (Oster- brock 1962). We briefly review the interpretation given by Adams (1972) with respect to the linear scaling of the mean number of scatterings with optical depth, since we refer to it extensively in the following sections. The mean number of scatterings is the inverse of the escape probability per scattering. The escape probability per scattering is the integral of the probability per scat- tering that a photon is scattered beyond certain frequency shift x∗. Adams (1972) identified this frequency as the fre- 4 Neufeld's definition, used in equation (16), is such that the opti- cal depth at frequency shift x is given as τx = τ0φ(x). Note that throughout this section, with the exception of equation (16), our definition of τ0 is such that the optical depth at frequency shift x is given as τx = τ0H(α, x). This definition was chosen following recent studies (e.g. Ahn et al. 2002; Zheng & Miralda-Escud´e 2002) so that comparisons with these studies be easier. Since φ(x) = H(α, x)/√π, our τ0 is smaller than Neufeld's by a factor of √π. Note though that in the following sections we return to the Neufeld (1990) definition of τ0. Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 5 Fig. 1. -- Left panel: Emergent spectra from the Monte Carlo RT (solid histograms) and as predicted analytically by Neufeld (1990) (dotted lines) for 3 different center -- of -- line optical depths. The agreement between Monte Carlo and analytical result becomes better with increasing optical depth, as expected since the analytical solution is valid for very optically thick media. Right panel: The same as in left panel but in this case the Monte Carlo results are derived with recoil being included, whereas the analytic solution does not include recoil. The dashed line in the case of τ0 = 106 is obtained by modifying the spectrum obtained from the Monte Carlo RT without recoil by the factor correcting for recoil (see text for details). ′ quency where the photon, while performing an excursion to the wings, and before returning back to the core, trav- els an rms distance comparable to the size of the medium. Note that this is in fact an essential difference in the un- derstanding of resonant-line RT in extremely thick media compared to the spatial random walk approach. The latter approach assumes that during an excursion to the wings the photon travels an rms distance much smaller than the size of the medium. Thus, the first step is to determine x∗. Using the redistribution function (i.e., the function that gives the probability that a photon with certain fre- quency shift x before scattering will have a frequency shift after scattering) one can calculate both the rms fre- x quency shift and the mean frequency shift of a photon which is scattered repeatedly. For a photon initially in the wings with a frequency shift x Osterbrock (1962) found that the rms shift is 1 and the mean frequency shift is −1/x. For x ≫ 1, the mean shift is much smaller than the rms and the photon is undergoing a random walk in frequency with mean number of scatterings ∼ x2. In real space, the rms distance traveled is equal to the square root of the mean number of scatterings times the mean free path. In the wings, the Voigt profile varies relatively slowly and the mean free path is ∼ 1/φ(x) ∼ x2/α line center optical depths (we only focus on the scalings here, hence constants of order unity are dropped). Thus, the distance traveled is x/φ(x) ∼ x3/α. Setting this rms dis- tance equal to τ0 we get x∗ ∼ (ατ0)1/3, which is in fact the scaling of the frequency shift where the emergent spec- trum takes its maximum value. Thus, going back to the mean number of scatterings, the escape probability per A(x)dx with A(x) a function to scattering will be ∼ R ∞ x∗ be determined. According to the previous discussion x∗ is the minimum frequency shift for which the photon during an excursion to the wings can travel an rms distance at least equal to the size of the medium. If, for simplicity, one assumes complete redistribution the probability that a photon is found after scattering with a shift between x and x + dx is φ(x)dx. However, this is not the prob- ability per scattering, since the photon will scatter ∼ x2 before returning to the core. Thus, A(x) is φ(x)/x2, and Nsc ∼hR ∞ , with φ(x) ∼ α/x2 in the wings. Using the above expression for x∗ one obtains Nsc ∼ τ0, with the constant of proportionality being of the order of unity. φ(x)/x2dxi−1 x∗ The emerging spectra without and with recoil included are shown in the left and right panel of Figure 1, respec- tively. A convergence test indicates that these results are robust if more than of order 103 photons are used. Refer- ring to the left panel of the figure, the agreement between the results obtained with the code and the analytic so- lution gets better at higher optical depths. As has been already mentioned, the analytic solution is derived after a series of approximations done on the assumption of opti- cally thick media. For example, when deriving the analytic solution the Voigt function is set equal to α/πx2. Set- ting the Voigt function equal to this approximation in the code makes the agreement even better. The way the spec- trum behaves for different ατ0 is expected qualitatively: the higher the optical depth or the lower the temperature (the higher the α), the more difficult it is for the pho- tons to exit the medium and the photon frequencies must move further away from resonance to escape. Hence, the 6 TASITSIOMI peaks of the emerging spectrum occur at higher frequency shifts, and the separation between the two peaks becomes larger. The width of the peaks gets larger with larger ατ0 in agreement with the dependence of the optical depth on frequency (i.e., when in the less optically thick regime core photons are relevant and the optical depth goes as e−x2 , whereas in the more optically thick regime wing photons are more relevant, and there the optical depth scales as 1/x2). In the right panel of Figure 1 we present numerical re- sults when recoil is included, along with the analytical solution (as a guide) that does not include recoil. As expected, including recoil shifts more photons to smaller (more red) frequencies. The magnitude of the effect can be understood as reflecting the thermalization of photons around frequency ν0 (Wouthuysen 1952; Field 1959). This process modifies the photon abundance by exp(−x/xT ), with xT = kBT /h∆νD. Indeed, in the right panel of Fig- ure 1 the dashed line for τ0 = 106 is obtained by modifying by exp(−x/xT ) the emerging spectrum obtained from the simulation when no recoil is included. These results are in agreement with the results and interpretations by Zheng & Miralda-Escud´e (2002). 2.2.2. Loeb & Rybicki (1999) test Loeb & Rybicki (1999) address the RT problem in a spherically symmetric, uniform, radially expanding neu- tral hydrogen cloud surrounding a central point source of Ly-α photons. No thermal motions are included (T = 0 K). They find that the mean intensity J(r, ν) as a function of distance from the source r and frequency shift ν in the diffusion (high optical depth) limit is given by J = 1 4π (cid:18) 9 4πν3(cid:19)3/2 exp(cid:18)− 9r2 4ν3(cid:19) (17) with ν = ν/ν⋆, ν = ν0 − νphoton, ν0 the Ly-α resonance frequency, and ν⋆ the frequency where the optical depth becomes unity. The scaled radius, r is equal to r/r⋆, with r⋆ the physical distance where the frequency shift due to the Hubble-like expansion of the hydrogen cloud equals the frequency shift that corresponds to unit optical depth (= ν⋆). A comparison of the results from the code with the analytic solution is shown in Figure 2. The analytic solution becomes progressively more accurate the higher the optical depth (or the smaller the frequency shift in the way this problem is parameterized, so that we are still in the core of the line). it deviates more and more from the (exact) simulation result at larger r, since the larger the r the more optically thin the medium and thus the further away we are from the assumption of an optically thick medium made by the analytic solution. Thus, the disagreement at high r is real and not an arti- fact caused, e.g., by small number of photons that would be inadequate to sample the low intensities at large r. In addition, 2.2.3. Simple models of Ly-α emitters: Spherical clouds of uniform density and temperature Here we develop some simple models of Ly-α emitters. Even though there are no analytic solutions for these cases, one could compare our results with the published results of Zheng & Miralda-Escud´e (2002). More speficically, in Fig. 2. -- Mean intensity as a function of radius for certain fre- quency shifts. Solid lines show the results from the Monte Carlo code and dotted lines show the analytic solution of Loeb & Rybicki (1999), appropriate in the diffusion limit. The specific frequency shifts plotted were chosen based on the fact that the diffusion limit is the right limit for ν << 1 (for details and definitions see text). this section, following these authors we model spherical neutral hydrogen clouds. We consider two different cases as far as the emission is concerned. In the first case it is as- sumed that we have a spherical cloud with a Ly-α emitting point source at its center. In the second case we assume uniform emissivity, namely a photon is equally likely to be emitted from any point within the cloud. For each one of these two cases we make runs assuming the cloud is static, contracting and expanding. In the latter two cases the contraction/expansion is assumed to be Hubble-like, namely the velocity of the neutral hydrogen atoms scales linearly with the radius measured from the center of the cloud. This velocity is set equal to 200 km/s at the edge of the system (and is negative/positive in the case of con- traction/expansion). For each case we perform two runs, one with column density equal to 2× 1018cm−2, typical for Lyman limit systems, and one with column density equal to 2 × 1020cm−2, typical of Damped Ly-α systems (or line center optical depths equal to 8.3 × 104 and 8.3 × 106, re- In all cases the temperature is set equal to spectively). 2 × 104K. The initial photon frequency is assumed to be at the line center in the rest frame of the atom. In all results shown, the effect of recoil is included. Lastly, 1000 photons were used in all runs. The results for the optically thin case are shown in Fig- ure 3 and that for the optically thick configuration are shown in Figure 4. In both case the agreement with the results obtained by Zheng & Miralda-Escud´e (2002) is very good. These spectra can be understood qualitatively us- ing the way the Neufeld solution behaves depending on the optical thickness. In the case of an expanding cloud, Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 7 Fig. 3. -- Top panel: frequency distribution of emergent Ly-α pho- tons in the case of a static (solid histograms ), a contracting (dot- ted histograms), and an expanding (dashed histograms), isothermal, spherically symmetric neutral hydrogen cloud with column density NHI = 2×1018cm−2 and uniform emissivity. Bottom panel: same as left panel but the Ly-α photons in this case originate from a central point source. Fig. 4. -- Top panel: frequency distribution of emergent Ly-α pho- tons in the case of a static (solid histograms ), a contracting (dot- ted histograms), and an expanding (dashed histograms), isothermal, spherically symmetric neutral hydrogen cloud with column density NHI = 2×1020cm−2 and uniform emissivity. Bottom panel: same as left panel but the Ly-α photons in this case originate from a central point source. the photons will escape on average with a redshift be- cause they are doing work on the expansion of the cloud as they are scattered. Photons with negative frequency shifts (redshifted) can escape, but those with positive fre- quency shift (blueshifted) will be scattered at some point and they have to undergo a series of many positive shift scatterings to escape. Hence, the blue part of the spec- trum is suppressed. The situation is reversed in the case of a contracting cloud. It is important to keep in mind that the degree of suppression of one of the two peaks due to bulk motions depends on factors such as the op- tical depth and the temperature. In the case of uniform emissivity and expansion/contraction all spectra become broader because of the different velocities of the emission In addition, when the cloud is ex- sites of the photons. panding (contracting), the blue (red) part of the spectrum is not suppressed as much as in the central point source case because, at least, photons initially emitted close to the edge of the system have some chance of escaping even if they are blue (red). In the optically thicker cloud, as soon as the photon reaches a sufficiently large x it is not likely that it will be scattered by an atom with the right velocity to bring the photon into the line center. Rather, the photon will get another random shift in frequency and will follow an excursion in frequency while at the same time it diffuses spatially. This along with the fact that the optical depth has a power law rather than Gaussian dependence on x broadens the peaks compared to those of the optically thin case, exactly as discussed for behavior of the Neufeld solution. In addition, the emission peaks move 8 TASITSIOMI further away from the center compared to those from the optically thin case, since the photons have to be further away from the center of the line in order to escape when the medium is optically thick. 2.3. Accelerating the RT c = e−x2 c/√π, where xc = (νc − ν0)/∆νD and α The previous tests demonstrated that our basic Monte Carlo scheme works well for the simple test cases. When using it in its simplest form in high resolution cosmological simulations, such as the ART simulations (see §3), it takes unrealistic running times in order to produce results with sufficient numbers of photons. This is because in the case of resonant RT in extremely optically thick media, a sig- nificant amount of time is spent on the relatively insignifi- cant core scatterings. If we define the core through the fre- quency range where the Doppler profile dominates over the Lorentzian wings, then roughly speaking the core is given by α/πx2 is as defined previously. For a temperature of 105 K, the core is roughly xc = 3.5. Also, assuming complete redis- tribution,5 the probability per scattering for a core photon to exit the core is I/(I + erf(xc)) with I = 2α/(πxc) and erf(xc) = 2 dt. That is, roughly, the photon will have to scatter (I + erf(xc))/I = 1 + erf(xc)/I ≃ 1 + I−1 ≃ I−1 times before exiting the core. Using the above core definition, one finds that this is equal to √πex2 c /(2xc) and keeping only the dominant dependence on xc, this is roughly ex2 c or ∼ 105 scatterings. These scatterings are insignificant in the sense that they happen in such copious amounts, without being accompanied by significant spa- tial diffusion, since the latter occurs mostly through the wings. 0 e−t2 √π R xc One way to advance photons in very high optical depths is to use the technique of the prejudiced first scattering (Cashwell & Everett 1959). With this technique one bi- ases the τ values toward larger values than the ones that would be drawn from equation(1). More specifically, τ is chosen to be uniformly distributed in [0, τesc], with τesc the optical depth for escape. Then one weights the pho- tons by τesce−τ to correct for the fact that τ (i) is limited to be less than or equal to τesc, and (ii) is assumed to be uniformly distributed in the < τesc range. Using this tech- nique however does not improve run time requirements to the extent we need and clearly more drastic acceleration methods are needed. Exiting the core does not in general guarantee that the photons escape. In fact, the photons may return back to the core many times before escaping. This is not surpris- ing since, as we will discuss, the maximum core frequen- cies that can be used are much smaller than x∗ discussed previously. Especially for extremely optically thick me- dia (ατ0 > 103), this in -- and out -- of -- the -- core procedure is still very expensive to follow. Hence, we accelerate our 5 In other words, assuming that the frequency distribution after scat- tering is independent of the frequency before scattering and is given by the line profile (i.e., the source function is independent of fre- quency). The assumption of complete redistribution was found to be pretty accurate for core photons (Unno 1952; Jefferies & White 1960). This is intuitively expected since, when in the core, the pho- ton frequency shift is small or comparable to the thermal velocities of the atoms. Thus, the latter can have a significant impact on the frequency of the photon and in effect they redistribute it after each scattering according to the line profile. RT scheme by implementing two different methods, de- pending on the center-of-line optical thickness of the cell a photon finds itself in (τ0), as well as on the thickness of the cell for the specific frequency shift of the incident pho- ton (= τ0φ(xi) with xi the frequency shift of the incident photon). In fact we parameterize the optical thickness of a cell not only via τ0, the line-of-center optical depth from the center of the cell to one of its edges, but rather via the product of α and τ0, motivated by the Neufeld solution. This parameterization turns out to be very good for media less optically thick than those the Neufeld solution applies to. We discuss these two acceleration methods, as well as some additional acceleration techniques in the following subsections. 2.3.1. Extremely optically thick cells: Controlled Monte Carlo motivated by the Neufeld solution This acceleration scheme is based on controlled Monte Carlo simulations of resonance RT in cells (cubes) with several physical conditions, representative of the extremely optically thick cells in the simulations. The idea is to ob- tain trends and best -- fit functional forms for the spectra emerging from thick cells. These spectra can then be used when running the code so that instead of following the scattering of the photons in detail, we can draw the fre- quency of the photon emerging from a thick cell using the pre-calculated spectrum appropriate for the physical con- ditions in this cell. In principle, controlled Monte Carlo simulations can be used for any range of optical thick- nesses. We use it only in the extremely optically thick cells where (ατ0)ef f > 2 × 103 and (τ0φ(xi))ef f ≫ 1 with xi the frequency shift of the incident photon.6 We do that because we are motivating this method by the Neufeld so- lution which is applicable only at the diffusion limit. The inherent cell structure of the AMR simulation outputs or the cell structure that can be generated for other cosmolog- ical codes, along with the resolution imposed isothermality and uniformity of each cell, are conducive to some kind of modification of the Neufeld solution. In some sense, with the advent of cosmological simulations, the contemporary analogue of the extensively studied classical slab problem is the completely unexplored problem of resonance RT in a cube. This motivated a detailed study of the resonance RT problem in cubes where the reader is referred to for more details and results (Tasitsiomi 2006). Here we only summarize briefly some key results relevant to the current study. As discussed in §2.2.1, the Neufeld solution was obtained under some assumptions. To fit the controlled Monte Carlo spectra with a Neufeld type spectrum we have to in- vestigate how sensitively the solution depends on these as- sumptions, as well as whether these assumptions are valid in cosmological simulations. This is done in the following paragraphs. 6 We have used the index eff because, as is discussed later in this section having in mind an implementation of the RT code for AMR simulations, to decide whether this method is applicable or not we create a mesh on top of the simulation mesh. In this new mesh, the photon is always at the center of a cell. Then it is the 'effective' physical conditions in this new cell that are relevant when decid- ing if the acceleration method at hand is applicable or not. In the case of simulations without a cell structure, the index eff becomes redundant, since there is no initial mesh to begin with. Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 9 Choosing the exiting frequency The exiting frequency of a photon entering an extremely optically thick cell is drawn by an emerging frequency dis- tribution similar to the Neufeld solution (equation 16). However, the Neufeld solution is derived for a semi-infinite slab, whereas the simulation cells are finite cubes. Further- more, the solution assumes isotropic scattering, no recoil, which anyway is negligible in the simulations, and does not include velocities such as those associated with pecu- liar motions or the Hubble expansion. Lastly, it assumes that the source of the radiation lies within the slab,7 and is valid for optically thick frequencies (τ0φ(xi) ≫ 1). Starting from the point on bulk velocities, we use the Neufeld solution -- applicable for an observer moving with the bulk flow of the fluid -- by taking into account the way the specific intensity transforms between two iner- tial observers moving at a certain speed with respect to each other (i.e., Iν/ν2 is invariant, where Iν is the number of photons rather than the energy intensity. In the latter case, the quantity that would be invariant would be Iν /ν3). The second point we address has to to do with the slab versus cube difference between the analytical solution and the simulations. As discussed in §2.2.1, Neufeld's solution depends on one parameter, ατ0. Qualitatively, one expects that the spectrum emerging from a cube rather than a slab be well described by the same solution but for an effective ατ0 smaller than the actual ατ0 of the cell. The reason for this is that when for example observing the emergent flux from the z-direction in a cube, we lose all photons that in the case of the slab would wander, scatter many times along the infinite dimensions and finally find their way out from the z-plane. In the case of the cube these photons would not be counted simply because they have exited the cube from planes other than the z-plane. This would be equivalent to solving the problem that Neufeld solved but this time including losses of photons (or, more appropri- ately, by generalizing the 2-dimensional diffusion equation derived by Neufeld into a four dimensional one -- instead of τ, ν now the intensity will be a function of τx, τy, τz and ν). Numerical experimentation of RT in cubes and slabs of the same physical conditions, verified that the above guess is correct. In fact, the cube spectrum is well described by the Neufeld solution for a slab if 2/3 of the ατ0 of the cube are used as input parameter to the slab analytic solution. This is shown in Figure 5 (also see Tasitsiomi 2006). Furthermore, the Neufeld solution assumes that the source of radiation lies within the slab (or cube in our case). In fact, the version of the solution we have been discussing so far (equation 16) assumes that the source is at the center of the slab. However, in the case of mesh -- based codes, as photons cross from one cell to the other, in general the source is not at the center of the cell. For codes without an inherent cell structure the obvious solution to this is to create a cell and have the photon at each instant at the center of the cell. As is discussed in what follows, this turns out to be the most efficient solution in the case of 7 More specifically, equation 16 assumes that the source is a plane source in the middle of the slab. Due to symmetry arguments, a plane source located at the middle of a slab is equivalent with respect to the spectrum of the emergent radiation to a central point source. Neufeld (1990) provides a more general expression for different source positions. Fig. 5. -- Comparison of the emergent spectra from a semi-infinite slab (dotted histograms) and a cube (dashed histograms) of the same physical conditions (ατ0 = 105). Also shown is the analytical so- lution derived by Neufeld (1990) (solid line) for the emergent spec- trum from a semi-infinite slab. Note that the analytical solution is for ατ0 = 2× 105/3, which is the 'effective' ατ0 one has to use in the analytic solution obtained for a semi-infinite slab, for the solution to give the spectrum from a finite cube of the same physical conditions as the slab. mesh -- based codes as well. Neufeld provides a more general expression for various source positions within the slab, as well as for the trans- mission and reflection coefficients assuming an external source. Using either option for mesh -- based codes, trying to take advantage of the already existing mesh structure, creates complications: in the case of a non-central but in- ternal source, the equivalence of a point or infinite plane source -- necessary for all the above discussion to be valid -- breaks down if the source is not located at the center of the slab. And using the reflection/transmission probabilities makes the algorithm more complicated. But most impor- tantly, there is an intrinsic limitation in the simulations due to finite resolution: it is not clear how meaningful it is to be discussing differences in position less than the cell size (i.e., if one can really tell the edge from the center of the cube). Instead, at every point the photon is found we create a new mesh on top of the simulation mesh. The pho- ton is always found at the center of a cell whose physical parameters are calculated using the cloud-in-cell weighting scheme. Each time the size of the cell is set to the simula- tion cell size the photon is in. Note that it is the physical parameters of this effective cell that determine the way the code proceeds (i.e., if the effective cell ατ0 is larger than 2 × 103 and τ0φ(xi) ≫ 1 then the controlled Monte Carlo results are used. If one of these two conditions (or both) is not satisfied in the effective cell then the code returns to the original cell. Depending on the original cell phys- ical conditions and the photon frequency either the exact 10 TASITSIOMI Monte Carlo or the method described in §2.3.2 is used). In the Neufeld solution the condition τ0φ(xi) ≫ 1 allows him to truncate a series appearing in the solution process by keeping up to first order terms in 1/(τ0φ(xi)). Thus, the solution is valid only for optically thick injection fre- quencies. We find that the higher order corrections are pretty small. However, for a certain tolerance, one must decide how thick is thick enough for the Neufeld spectrum to be applicable. We take that the spectrum from a slab is satisfactorily predicted by the analytical solution for fre- quency shifts for which τ0φ(xi) ≥ 10. As has been shown in §2.2.1 the recoil effect can be eas- ily accounted for multiplying the Neufeld solution by the appropriate factor. In any event, the recoil effect for our conditions is negligible and hence is dropped in the simula- tion calculations. To see this, the recoil effect corresponds to a frequency shift that would be caused by a velocity ≃ hν/mpc = 3 m/s. This velocity is negligible compared to the thermal velocities expected in cosmological simula- tions, and given the peculiar and Hubble flow velocities, the small non-coherence in the atom's rest frame intro- duced by recoil will be totally unobservable. Hence, the Neufeld approximation is good in that respect as well. Choosing the exiting direction and point Referring to µ, the cosine of the angle with which the pho- ton is exiting a cell, measured with respect to the normal to the exiting surface, we draw its value from the following cumulative probability distribution function (cpdf) (Tasit- siomi 2006) P (< µ) = µ2 7 (3 + 4µ) . (18) This cpdf is found to be an excellent description of the directionality of the emergent spectrum and clearly devi- ates from isotropy. In fact, it verifies the findings of other studies that in optically thick media photons tend to exit in directions perpendicular to the exiting surface (see, e.g., Chandrasekhar 1960; Phillips & Meszaros 1986; Ahn et al. 2002). In the case of RT in accretion disks this has been identified as an expected limb darkening (or 'beaming'; Phillips & Meszaros 1986) of the disk (i.e., the disk is very bright when observed face on and less bright when ob- served edge on). In cases of very optically thick media, the emerging radiation directionality approaches the Thomson scattered radiation emergent from a Thomson-thick elec- tron medium. This Thomson limit obtained initially by Chandrasekhar (1960), was confirmed later numerically by Phillips & Meszaros (1986). It has been implied by some authors (Ahn et al. 2002) that the fact that in optically thick media RT occurs mostly via wing photons with the latter being described by a dipole phase function (see §2.1.2), and the fact that Thom- son scattering is also described by a Rayleigh (dipole) scattering phase function, explains why the resulting µ probability distributions are similar. However, we find the same cpdf when the scattering is taken to follow either an isotropic or a dipole distribution. For such optical thick- nesses the details of the exact phase function do not mat- ter, at least not with respect to the exiting angle cpdf. All the phase functions involved in Ly-α scattering are only mildly anisotropic and they simply enhance a little bit the coherence of the scattering at the observer's frame com- pared to the isotropic scattering case. So the fact that the exiting angle cpdf in extremely optically thick slabs (cubes) does not depend crucially on the assumptions on the phase functions does not come as a surprise. The un- derlying physics is simply that in extremely thick media most of the photons escape along the normal to the slab where the opacity is smaller. The azimuthal angle φ with which the photon exits a cell is distributed fairly uniformly in [0, 2π] (for more details see Tasitsiomi 2006). Referring to the distribution of exit points, one can ar- gue that trying to specify the exact coordinates of the exit point of a photon from a simulation cell is, in some sense, superfluous since there is always the resolution limitation. Thus, we assume that the exiting points are distributed uniformly. The deviations of the exiting points from uni- formity are relatively small (Tasitsiomi 2006). Similarly, resolution limitations make us focus on total distribution functions of photon properties -- where total here means distributions averaged over an entire cube side -- without regards to a possible dependence of these distribution func- tions on the photon exit point. Lastly, we have checked whether the emergent photon parameters can be drawn independently. We found no significant correlations among them (e.g., we checked for correlations between emergent frequency shift and (pre- ferred) range of exiting directions). Thus, drawing them independently is correct. 2.3.2. Moderately optically thick cells: Skipping the core scatterings This acceleration scheme is used if the cell the photon is in has 1 ≤ ατ0 ≤ 2 × 103. It is also used in the case of cosmological simulation codes with a pre-existing mesh when the cell the photon is in has ατ0 > 2 × 103, but the effective cell (see §2.3.1) has 1 ≤ ατ0 ≤ 2 × 103, and thus the previous acceleration scheme (discussed in §2.3.1) is not applicable. The scheme is based on the idea that if a photon is within a certain core (to be determined), we can skip all the core scatterings and go directly to the scattering with a rapidly moving atom that can bring the photon out of the core (for some first implementations of this idea see Avery & House 1968; Ahn et al. 2002). As soon as this happens, the initial detailed transfer resumes until either the photon escapes or re-enters the core. The scheme's validity relies upon the correct choice of the core value, so that while in the core the photon does not diffuse significantly in space, whereas significant diffusion occurs when the photon exits the core. To achieve the scattering that brings the photon out- side the core we choose thermal velocities (in units of p2kT /m) from the distribution (Avery & House 1968; Ahn et al. 2002) (19) p(v) = 1 √π e−v2 and in the range [vmin, vmax]. The lower limit vmin is the minimum velocity necessary for the photon to just make it to the core xc. The upper limit is formally in- finite, but for any practical realization it can be set to a c + 10). For a scattering to bring the photon to just xc from the center, independent large enough number (e.g., px2 Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 11 of the directions of incident and outgoing photon, and un- der the assumptions of coherence in the rest frame of the atom, isotropic scattering phase function, and zero radia- tion damping, it can be shown that vmin = max(x,xc) (Hummer 1962), with x the initial frequency shift (as usual in units of the thermal Doppler width). In our case it is always vmin = xc since the photon is inside the core. We checked and verified that the assumptions under which vmin is derived are good for cosmological simulations. This is not surprising since, e.g., the assumption of an isotropic phase function is not very crucial. As discussed already, none of the relevant phase functions is strongly anisotropic. Those that are anisotropic simply tend to favor slightly smaller frequency shifts (since they favor post-scattering directions close to pre-scattering directions) and hence in- crease a little bit the coherence in the observer's frame from scattering to scattering. At the limit of many scat- terings (and while still at the optically thick regime) this is not a significant effect (for the tiny differences in the fre- quency redistribution function with isotropic versus dipole phase function see Figure I of Hummer 1962). Or, the as- sumption of coherence in the rest frame of the atom is also expected to be a pretty good assumption for the me- dia in the simulations from the point of view of the recoil effect, as we discuss in §2.3.1, and from the point of view of collisions as we discuss in §3.5.1. To motivate the core values we can use (i.e., the maxi- mum frequency shifts for which we can ignore the repeated scatterings without biasing the results) we must take into account the different physics of resonant RT in the two different regimes, 1 ≤ ατ0 ≤ 2× 103 and ατ0 > 2× 103. In the first regime photons escape on a single longest flight (Adams 1972) in accordance with the understanding of resonant RT in moderately thick media developed by Os- terbrock (1962). In this thickness regime the important frequency is the frequency where the optical depth be- comes unity. Photons within this frequency shift barely diffuse in space, whereas as soon as they exit this fre- quency shift they escape while taking their longest spa- tial step (flight). In the second, extremely optically thick regime (ατ0 > 2 × 103) as Adams (1972) suggested, pho- tons escape during a single longest excursion rather than flight. In this case the important frequency is the fre- quency with the following property: if a photon is given this frequency and is left to slowly return to the center of the line (by performing a double random walk, in space and frequency), the overall rms distance that it will travel in real space while returning to the line center equals the size of the medium (i.e., the important frequency shift in this case is the shift x∗ discussed in §2.2.1). This physics motivates our cores, i.e., for moderately thick media the core must be safely optically thick, whereas for extremely optically thick media the core must be safely smaller than x∗. Then using numerical experimentation we find the ex- act maximum possible core values that can be used in each case. A comparison of the exact Monte Carlo and the core acceleration scheme applied to moderately thick media is shown in Figure 6. Note that these spectra are one cell runs, and are not the final results of the RT around the Ly- α emitter (which are discussed in a later section). In the top panel, we present the exact emergent spectrum from Fig. 6. -- Top panel: Comparison of the exact Monte Carlo results ('ex.', solid line) and the results obtained using the core acceleration method ('ap.', dotted line) for the minimum cell ατ = 1 for which this acceleration method is used in the Ly-α RT code. Also shown is a larger core frequency, xc = 0.2, which shows the way the emergent spectrum is biased if one uses a higher core frequency. Bottom panel: Same as in top panel but for more optically thick cells, ατ0 = 102. In this case a core frequency xc = 0.8 can be used. In addition, we show exact results for a different pair of temperature and optical depth (dashed line), that however correspond to ατ0 = 102. Clearly, ατ0 is a good way to parameterize the problem at these moderate optical thicknesses. a cube with ατ0 = 1, as well as the spectrum obtained if a core xc = 0.02 is used. Despite it being a pretty small core, it improves the speed of the algorithm by orders of magnitude.8 Also shown is what the bias would be if one used a higher core frequency (xc = 0.2): photons would be artificially shifted at higher (absolute) frequency shifts. 8 The exact improvement factor depends on optical thickness, and is higher for thinner cells. Furthermore, the improvement factor is different for the same ατ0 but different temperatures and optical depths. More specifically, it is higher for lower optical depths and temperatures. 12 TASITSIOMI To find the maximum core that can be used without this biasing, we made runs with successively higher cores. We use as cores: 0.02 for 1 ≤ ατ0 < 10, 0.1 for 10 ≤ ατ0 < 102 and 0.8 for 102 ≤ ατ0 < 2 × 103. One can easily verify that for a wide temperature range these cores are safely within the optically thick regime. The comparison between the exact Monte Carlo and the accelerated scheme for optically thicker cells (but still at the moderately thick regime) is shown at the bottom panel of Figure 6. We have seen via the Neufeld solution that characterizing a slab -- or a cube in our case -- us- ing ατ0 is very good in the case of very optically thick media (ατ0 ≥ 103). In the bottom panel of Figure 6 we present two different sets of temperature and τ0, which nevertheless correspond to the same ατ0 (and smaller than that for which the Neufeld solution is applicable). Clearly, ατ0 parameterizes nicely enough these emergent spectra as well. This fact justifies our classification of simulation cells with respect to their ατ0 value. Note that the fact that the emergent spectrum for these physical conditions seems to depend on ατ0 is not trivial, and was checked only for ranges of temperature and optical depth that are anticipated to be relevant to cosmological simulation en- vironments. A simple way to see why this may not be a general statement comes from the physics of RT in mod- erately thick media. As discussed in such media photons escape roughly when they reach the frequency where the optical depth is unity. If, for example, the frequency shift x where the optical depth becomes unity is within the Doppler core (as anticipated) then this frequency shift is defined through τ0e−x2 = 1 and clearly depends only on τ0 and not on temperature. This is in contrast to ex- tremely optically thick media where the frequency shift relevant for escape through the single longest excursion is x∗ ∼ (ατ0)1/3 (see §2.2.1), namely it depends on ατ0. In the case of extremely thick media we find roughly the following maximum possible cores: 3 for 2 × 103 ≤ ατ0 < 104, 5 for 104 ≤ ατ0 < 105, 7 for 105 ≤ ατ0 < 106, 17 for 106 ≤ ατ0 < 107, 30 for 107 ≤ ατ0 < 108, and 80 for ατ0 ≥ 108. As an example, in Figure 7 we show the Neufeld prediction for the emergent spectrum from a slab with ατ0 = 107 and the results of our acceleration scheme using a core xc = 30. This is a quite large core frequency, and still the acceleration scheme gives a very accurate emergent spectrum. The core values we find scale with x∗ roughly as xc ≃ 0.15x∗. The ατ0-dependent core frequencies that we motivate here based on the different physics for different ατ0 regimes is a quite new approach. Previous studies (e.g., Hansen & Oh 2005) define the core frequency as the frequency where the wings start dominating over the Doppler core. Clearly, to achieve the best efficiency of the acceleration scheme, which is highly desirable in our applications due to the very complex environments, we have to use a depth -- dependent core definition. Other authors who considered variation of the core frequency with temperature and optical depth (Ahn et al. 2002) find a bit different values than ours, at least for the low ατ0 range that they worked with: they find that a core frequency of about √π can be used for ατ0 > 103, with slightly higher values permitted for even larger τ0. However, we find that this value is a bit large for ατ0 ≃ 103, and that significantly higher core values can be Fig. 7. -- Comparison of the analytic solution obtained by Neufeld (1990, 'ex.', solid line) and the results obtained using the approxi- mate core acceleration method ('ap.', dotted line) for ατ = 107 and xc = 30. The point of the figure is that at extremely high optical depths the core values one can use can be pretty high. used for higher τ0. The reasons for our disagreement with Ahn et al. (2002) are not clear. The discussion with respect to the validity of this ac- celeration scheme has been limited so far to the emergent spectrum of radiation. One would expect to see that in- deed the assumption that the photons do not move signif- icantly in space during the multiple core scatterings that are skipped is true. And, that all other quantities, such as exit point and exit angle distributions remain the same, in addition to the emergent spectrum. The latter has been tested and found true. Furthermore, note that the an- gle information is relevant mostly when the photon is at the optically thin regime, where anyway we use the exact transfer scheme. With respect to the exit points, or dis- tances that the photons move while in the core, since these are not larger than one cell size, limitations due to the fi- nite simulation resolution render these concerns moot. To get an idea, following an argument similar to that pre- sented in §2.2.1 leading to x∗ ≃ (ατ0)1/3, and using the scaling xc ≃ 0.15x∗ one finds that by ignoring the scat- terings within the core for extremely optically thick cells roughly one ignores a spatial diffusion of the photons of order 10−3 of the size of a simulation cell. In summary, each time a photon enters a simulation cell, there are the following three possibilities: 1. If the cell has ατ0 < 1, the exact Monte Carlo RT is used. 2. If the cell has 1 ≤ ατ0 ≤ 2 × 103 and the photon frequency shift is x ≤ xc, then we skip the core scatterings. If the photon frequency is outside the core we use again the exact Monte Carlo RT. Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 13 3. If the cell has ατ0 > 2 × 103 then if there is no pre- existing mesh structure of the cosmological simula- tion then if the frequency of the photon is such that τ0φ(x) ≫ 1 then the controlled Monte Carlo results are used. If there is a pre-existing mesh structure, then if ατ0 > 2 × 103 then the physical conditions of the effective cell are calculated. If for the effec- tive cell it is (i) ατ0 > 2 × 103 and the frequency of the photon is such that (ii) τ0φ(x) ≫ 1, then we use the controlled Monte Carlo motivated by the Neufeld solution. If either (i) or (ii) is not true, then the first acceleration scheme is tried for the original rather than the effective cell. And if it is not applicable, then the exact Monte Carlo scheme is used. 2.3.3. Calculating images and spectra To construct images of the Ly-α emitters for various di- rections of observation the code calculates the contribution to the image along a certain direction at each scattering (see, e.g. Yusef-Zadeh et al. 1984; Zheng & Miralda-Escud´e 2002). This contribution is e−τescP (φ, µ) where τesc is the optical depth for escape from the current scattering po- sition along the direction of observation to the observer, µ is the cosine of the angle between the direction of the incident photon and the direction of observation, φ is the azimuthal angle, and P (φ, µ) is the normalized probability distribution for the photon direction (in fact P is indepen- dent of φ in our case). This way of calculating images and spectra has the ad- vantage of giving fairly good statistics for relatively small numbers of photons. Thus, by lowering the number of photons needed for the results to converge, it can poten- tially speed up the calculations. It also converges rapidly for the fainter parts of the source, hence it is very useful for sources with high emissivity contrast. One disadvan- tage is that due to computing resources limitations it lim- its the calculations to only a small number of pre-chosen directions of observations. In addition, for complicated ge- ometries such as those produced in simulations one must verify that running more photons is more expensive than calculating τesc used in this method. We find that indeed this is the case for the ART environments where the RT code is applied in this study. 2.3.4. Parallelization To reach high performance we implement the parallel execution of the code. Our Monte Carlo scheme is partic- ularly easy to parallelize, since each ray is independent of others. The parallelization is done using the Message Pass- ing Interface (MPI) library of routines. As every photon ray is independent, communication requirements among the different processes are minimal, and in essence MPI distributes copies of the code which are run autonomously in the different nodes used. However, each processor is as- signed and runs photons from different emission regions. To get an idea about the performance of the code (using the above acceleration schemes), 107 photons 9 transfer to 10 physical kpc from the center of the ART Ly-α emitter 9 This number of photons is well above the minimum necessary for the results to converge as will be discussed in a later section we apply the code to in about 4 hours on 8 Intel Xeon 3.2 GHz processors on the Tungsten NCSA cluster . 2.4. Final images and spectra of simulated Ly-α emitters The detailed Ly-α RT is carried out up to a certain distance from the center of the source and then the Ly-α GP absorption is added. This distance where the detailed RT stops is determined through a convergence test. The existence of such a scale is guaranteed given that the fur- ther away a photon moves from the center of the object, the most improbable it becomes for it to scatter back in the direction of observation. Furthermore, the size of this convergence radius can also be motivated observationally, from the extent of Ly-α halos that have been observed. The surface brightness of each pixel of the constructed image is SBp = Σi,jFi,je−τesc,i,j P (φ, µ) Ωpix × e−τGP , (20) where the sum is over the fluxes of all photons (i), and all their scatterings (j) with scattering positions that project onto the pixel; Ωpix is the angle subtended by the pixel to the observer, and the factor e−τGP accounts for the dimin- ishing of the brightness due to the hydrogen intervening between the radius where the detailed RT stops and the observer. To find the flux Fi,j carried by each photon at each interaction, we first calculate the total luminosity, Ltot, of the emitter through the sum of the luminosities of the individual source cells. For N photons (or more ac- curately wavepackets) used in the Monte Carlo, then each photon carries a luminosity Fi,j (independent of photon and scattering numbers i and j, respectively, in our case) equal to (21) Fi,j = Ltot N 1 d2 L where dL is the luminosity distance calculated for the adopted cosmology. Note that there is no 1/4π factor. This factor comes from P (φ, µ) -- in equation (20) -- which is normalized to unity. The GP absorption optical depth is calculated as de- scribed in Hui et al. (1997). It is calculated for each pixel separately, and the number of different lines of sight that have to be used per pixel is determined by checking con- vergence of the final result. For high enough image spatial resolution (similar to the one used in this study) one line of sight per pixel is enough, since the simulations them- selves have finite spatial resolution. The characteristics of the line emerging after the detailed RT (i.e., its width) and before adding the GP absorption determine how far away in distance one must go when calculating τGP , since one needs to go up to the point where the shortest line wave- length is redshifted at least to the Ly-α resonance because of Hubble expansion. Often, this physical distance is larger than the physical size of the cosmological simulation box. In this case, we take advantage of the periodic boundary conditions and use replicas of the same box making sure we do not go through the same structures. This turns out to be easily done as long as one does not have to use the box too many times (more than ∼ 5). Furthermore, we consider two distinct scenarios, one where the effect of the red damping wing is taken into account and one where the red damping wing is suppressed as would be the case if for 14 TASITSIOMI example the Ly-α emitter was in the vicinity of a bright quasar. Lastly, spectra are obtained by collapsing the 3-D image array (2 spatial dimensions+wavelength) along the spatial dimensions. 3. application to cosmological simulations 3.1. The simulations Here we present some basic information regarding the cosmological simulations we use in what follows in order to apply the Ly-α RT code in a cosmological setting. The RT is carried out using outputs of the ART code for the concordance flat ΛCDM model: Ω0 = 1 − ΩΛ = 0.3, h = 0.7, where Ω0 and ΩΛ are the present-day matter and vacuum densities, and h is the dimensionless Hubble con- stant defined as H0 ≡ 100h km s−1 Mpc−1. For the power spectrum normalization the value σ8 = 0.9 is used. This model is consistent with recent observational constraints (e.g., Spergel et al. 2003). The initial conditions of these simulations are the same as those in Kravtsov (2003) and Kravtsov & Gnedin (2005), leading to the formation of a Milky Way sized galaxy at z = 0. However, these simu- lations are different in that, in addition to dark matter, gas dynamics, star formation and feedback, cooling, etc., they also include non-equilibrium ionization and thermal balance of H, He, H2 and primordial chemistry, full RT of ionizing radiation and optically thin line RT of Lyman- Werner radiation. The continuum RT is modeled accord- ing to the Optically Thin Variable Eddington Tensor ap- proximation described in Gnedin & Abel (2001), whereas cooling uses the abundances of species from the reaction network, as well as corrections for cooling enhancement due to metals. The code reaches high force resolution by refining all high-density regions with an automated refinement algo- rithm. The criterion for refinement is the mass of dark matter particles and gas per cell. Overall there are 9 re- finement levels. The physical size of a cell of refinement level l is 26.161 × 29−l pcs at z ≃ 8 (the redshift we fo- cus on in this study). The dark matter particle mass at the highest resolution region is 9.18× 105h−1M⊙, and the box size for which results are presented in this paper is 6h−1Mpc. For each simulation cell we have available information such as the temperature, the peculiar velocity, the neutral hydrogen density, the ionized hydrogen density, the metal- licity, etc. With this information and using the mesh of the ART code itself we follow how Ly-α photons are being ini- tially emitted and subsequently getting scattered. As an example of an application of the Ly-α RT code developed for the ART code we focus on the most massive emitter at z ≃ 8. This emitter is found within a highly ionized, butterfly -- shaped bubble. Outside this bubble the Uni- verse is highly neutral, whereas some dense neutral cores associated with the forming galaxy exist within the bub- ble. Results for more emitters, different redshifts, multiple directions of observation, larger simulation boxes, etc., will be presented in future papers. 3.2. Intrinsic Ly-α emission There are a number of different mechanisms that can produce Ly-α emission from high-redshift objects. Here we classify them into recombination and collisional emis- sion mechanisms. By recombination emission mechanisms we refer to Ly-α photons that are the final result of the cas- cading of recombination photons produced in ionized gas. The gas may be ionized by the UV radiation of hot, young, massive stars, from an AGN hosted by the galaxy, or by the intergalactic UV background. By collisional emission mechanisms we refer to photons that are produced by the radiative decay of excited bound (neutral) hydrogen states, with collisions being the mechanism by which these excited states are being populated. This mechanism takes place when gas within a dark matter halo is cooling and col- lapsing to form a galaxy and radiates some of the gravita- tional collapse energy by collisionally excited Ly-α emis- sion, when gas is shock heated by galactic winds or by jets in radio galaxies, and in supernova remnant cooling shells. We underscore the fact that the states are bound states, because in principle collisions can also cause ion- ization in which case we would have production of Ly-α photons under a recombination mechanism, according to our definition conventions. With the exception of AGN and jets, which are not included in ART simulations, as well as the fluorescence emission due to the intergalactic UV background which would be relevant at lower redshifts than we focus on in this study, we will try to briefly assess the importance of these separate Ly-α emission sources. This is interesting in particular because, in addition to the different dependence on the physical parameters (i.e., different temperature dependence and dependence on ion- ized versus neutral hydrogen), these mechanisms may also have a different spatial distribution. For example, shock heated gas from gravitational collapse may be a spatially more extended Ly-α source than the gas photoionized by UV radiation of young stars at the relatively compact star forming regions. The dominant source of Ly-α emission may be what distinguishes most Ly-α emitters from the more extended sources referred to in literature as Ly-α blobs (Steidel et al. 2000; Haiman et al. 2000; Fardal et al. 2001; Bower et al. 2004). Before discussing the different Ly-α emission mecha- nisms, we should first mention that, due to practical lim- itations (i.e., we can only use a relatively limited number of photons), we use as source cells only the cells that con- tribute significantly to the total luminosity of the object. Hence, we set a threshold on the cell luminosity and use as source cells only the cells whose luminosity exceeds this threshold. Then by performing a convergence test, namely by doing runs assuming different luminosity thresholds up to the point where including lower luminosity source cells does not change the results (within some pre-specified tol- erance), we determine the minimum luminosity a simula- tion cell must emit to be one of the cells where photons will originate from. It is meaningful to consider a similar con- vergence check with respect to the Ly-α RT results, and this will be discussed in a later section. The convergence test reveals that the luminosity of the object is dominated by a few very luminous cells. To get an idea, the luminosi- ties of cells within the virial extent roughly range from 1041 to several times 1054 photons/s. The total luminos- ity of the object is the sum of the luminosities of the cells considered. Even though most of the volume, say, within the virial radius is in low to moderate luminosity cells, Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 15 the sum of the luminosities of these cells is not significant enough compared to the less numerous high luminosity cells. For the object at hand the convergence test suggests that one can use as source cells only cells with luminosities above ≃ 5 × 1050 photons s−1. This value determines the relative importance of the different Ly-α emission mecha- nisms discussed in what follows. With the aforementioned luminosity threshold, the total luminosity of the emitter at hand is roughly equal to 4.8× 1043 ergs/s. We sample the emission region (i.e., the cells with luminosity above the luminosity threshold discussed) by emitting equal weight wave packets, but in numbers that reflect the relative lu- minosities of the cells. Note that this discussion on the various mechanisms, emission rates, etc., should somehow be affected by the limited simulation resolution, a factor that will be studied in detail in the future. Furthermore, the approach adopted in this section is an 'order-of-magnitude' one. We defer a more thorough and statistical analysis of the Ly-α emis- sion sources in high redshift galaxies to a future study, where all factors will be taken into account. For exam- ple, the discussion about the importance of the various emission mechanisms must be extended to the after RT results and after including dust. This is because it could, for example, be the case that recombination Ly-α photons, despite being more numerous as discussed below, may be more likely to be absorbed than collisional Ly-α photons, if one assumes that there is more dust in star forming re- gions -- where recombination photons are generated -- than in regions where collisional Ly-α photons originate from. 3.2.1. Ly-α photons from recombinations The recombination rate of a cell is r = nenpαBV (22) with ne, np the number density of electrons and protons, respectively, and V the volume. In principle species other than hydrogen may contribute to ne. Thus, ne in general is not equal to np. In what follows, we take into account electrons contributed by the ionization of He. Other BBN predicted species such as Li, Be and B (with, anyway, tiny abundances), and elements produced through stellar pro- cessing such as C, N and O are not taken into account. Recombination photons are converted with certain effi- ciency into Ly-α photons. In particular, for a broad range of temperatures centered on T = 104 K, roughly 38% of recombinations go directly to the ground state. A fraction ∼ 1/3 (32%) of the recombinations that do not go to the ground state go to 2S rather than 2P and then go to the ground state via two continuum photon decay (cf. Table 9.1 of Spitzer 1978). Hence, only a fraction ∼ 40% of the recombinations yield a Ly-α photon. The temperatures of simulation cells within the virial extent of the emitter are in the 102.4 − 106.3 K range, with most cells in the 104 − 106 K range. Due to the weak temperature depen- dence of the various recombination coefficients the above conversion efficiencies are roughly applicable throughout this temperature range. Furthermore, if the gas is optically thick, then photons that originate from recombinations to the ground state will be immediately absorbed by another neutral hydrogen atom and eventually they, as well, will produce Ly-α photons. Assuming for now that this is the case (as will be discussed later in this section), as well as that the medium is thick in Lyman-series photons, so that all higher Lyman-series photons are re-captured and eventually yield Ly-α photons, we adopt case B recombi- nation. For the recombination coefficient we use the fit obtained by Hui & Gnedin (1997), accurate to 0.7% for temperatures from 1 to 109K αB = 2.753 × 10−14cm3s−1 λ1.5 (23) h1 +(cid:0) λ 2.74(cid:1)0.407i2.242 with λ = 2Ti/T , and Ti = 157807 K the hydrogen ioniza- tion threshold temperature. In agreement with the above argument, the effective recombination coefficient at level 2P is approximately 2/3 of the case B recombination co- efficient and that is what we use to convert recombination rates into Ly-α photon emission rates. Thus we assume that the conversion efficiency from recombination to Ly-α photons is exactly the same for all simulation cells. This is a good assumption since the conversion efficiency has a very weak temperature dependence. The exact conversion efficiency for each source cell also depends on the rate at which collisions redistribute atoms between the 2S and 2P state. Collisions with both elec- trons and protons are relevant. To get an idea for the cross sections involved, for a temperature of 104K and thermal protons σ2S→2P ≃ 3 × 10−10cm2 (Osterbrock 1989). For thermal protons and electrons the thermally averaged col- lisional cross sections for the processes (24) and H(2P ) + p → H(2S) + p H(2P ) + e → H(2S) + e (25) are qp = 4.74 × 10−4cm3/s and qe = 5.70 × 10−5cm3/s, respectively, for a temperature of 104K (cf. table 4.10 of Osterbrock 1989). The 2P to 2S transition is relatively important when the proton number densities are small (< 104cm−3), and in this case there is some probability that the Ly-α photon gets destroyed through a two quantum decay. For higher densities the opposite conversion (2S to 2P ) becomes important, canceling out the destruction effect (Osterbrock 1989). At the lower density regime, which is applicable in the simulations since there np < 104 cm−3 everywhere (within the virial extent the proton number density range is 10−4−102.5 cm−3, with most cells in the range 10−3 − 1 cm−3), we can check how important this process really is by comparing the radiative decay time and the typical time between collisions, qp(T )np + qe(T )ne p = ≃ 8.5 × 10−13npT −0.17 A21 4 (26) where the number densities of protons and electrons were assumed to be roughly the same and in cm−3, A21 = 6.25 × 108s−1 is the spontaneous radiative decay for the Ly-α transition, and temperature is measured in 104K units. The temperature dependence of the collision rates is taken from Neufeld (1990). For the temperature and pro- ton/electron density ranges relevant to the source cell con- ditions, the probability for a collisional 2P to 2S transition is negligible, at least for the initial emissivity. We discuss their effect during scattering of the photons in §3.5.1. One assumption that we make is that the cascading of the Lyman series photons, as well as the re-emission 16 TASITSIOMI Fig. 8. -- Left panel: Cumulative probability distribution of center-of-line optical depths of ART simulation cells within the virial extent. The three different lines correspond to the cell optical depth distribution in Ly-α (solid), Ly-δ (dotted) and Ly-limit (dashed) photons. Right panel: Ly-α center-of-line optical depth of the simulation cells within the virial extent of the emitter plotted against the cell recombination rate. Since only cells with the highest recombination rates (≥ 1051 s−1 or, equivalently, luminosities roughly ≥ 5 × 1050 photons s−1) need to be used as source cells, and almost all of these cells have τ ≥ 103, roughly speaking our 'on-the-spot' approximation is satisfactory (see text for details). and re-absorption of photons from recombination to the ground state, is done 'on-the-spot', namely, locally. In our case "locally" means within the same simulation cell. This assumption is essential if one wants the Ly-α emis- sivity of a cell to depend on its own recombination rate only. If not, one faces the complicated situation where the Ly-α emissivity of one cell depends on the recombination rates and photon cascade processes that are happening in other cells as well. The validity of our assumption de- pends on the optical depth of Lyman series and ionizing photons when traversing a typical cell in the simulation (and should also be affected somewhat by resolution). In the left panel of Figure 8 we show the optical depth prob- ability distribution function for Ly-α, Ly-δ and Ly-limit radiation. The distribution function has as independent variable the optical depth of simulation cells within 10 physical kpc (≃ virial extent) from the center of the emit- ter. These distributions are very similar, differing only by the values of τ because of different oscillator strengths and characteristic frequencies. Clearly, in all cases more than half potential source cells are not optically thick, and this is expected to get worse for ionizing radiation beyond the Lyman limit. However, as shown in the right panel of Figure 8 the optical depth of a cell correlates with its recombination rate. In this figure the optical depth plot- ted is that for Ly-α photons, but it is easy to see how this scales approximately with optical thickness for other Lyman-series photons. Since only cells with recombination rates higher than 1051 s−1 (or equivalently with luminosi- ties higher than roughly 5 × 1050 photons s−1) are used as source cells, our 'on-the-spot' assumption seems pretty satisfactory, if not always accurate. It becomes less and less accurate the higher we go in the Lyman series, and of course beyond the Lyman limit but for the time being we content ourselves with this approximation, given the com- plexities introduced when this assumption is not adopted. We will investigate this point further in the future. Lastly, to get an idea about the physical conditions of the highest recombination rate (luminosity) source cells, they consist of two classes with respect to temperature and neutral hydrogen fraction: one class contains cold gas elements (T ∼ 103K), with a neutral hydrogen fraction > 0.9 (and high gas number density). The second class of very luminous cells consist of warmer gas elements (T ∼ 104 K and a bit higher). In the context of Ly-α cooling radiation, discussed in the next section, the first class of cells are unable to cool via atomic hydrogen cooling since they are cold, whereas the second class of most luminous cells could cool via atomic hydrogen cooling temperature- wise, but that is not happening because these cells are highly ionized. 3.2.2. Ly-α photons from collisional excitations A collisional emission mechanism whose importance for the simulated objects can be assessed relatively easily is that of atomic hydrogen cooling. Using the expression by Hui & Gnedin (1997) for the hydrogen cooling rate (used in the ART simulations analyzed here), and assuming for the moment that this energy is all emitted in the form of Ly-α photons, we obtain for the luminosity (number of Ly-α photons/s) emitted by a cell Lcool = 4.6 × 10−8 e−1.18355/T5 1 + T 0.5 5 nenHI V (27) Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 17 cooling shells, respectively. A thorough investigation of the relative importance of SNR Ly-α emission with respect to that from young stars photoionization has been carried out by Charlot & Fall (1991, 1993). The general conclu- sion reached is that for a broad range of physical conditions and assumptions, the SNR contribution is at best a factor of 2.5 less than that from stellar ionizing radiation. These results make the effort to include the (anyway not resolved in ART simulations) SNR contributions superfluous. 3.3. The Ly-α emitter before RT To get an idea of the size of the emitting region, the prevailing physical conditions, and for comparison with results obtained later after including RT, in this subsec- tion we briefly present the emission spectrum and image of the emitter as they would appear to an observer at z = 0 if the Ly-α photons escaped without any scattering. An image and a spectrum of the emitter along a certain di- rection of observation is shown in the left and right panel, respectively, of Figure 10. The image is a surface brightness map (in units of ergs s−1 cm−2 arcsec−2) of a roughly 1.4 × 1.4 arcsecs2 field which corresponds to approximately one third of the virial extent of the dark matter halo the emitter lives in (with the virial extent ≃ 20 physical kpc in diameter). There are two distinct emission regions, each one corresponding to the two progenitors that merged and formed this object. The color scale for the surface brightness is logarithmic. Clearly, the emission region is very small (the largest of the two structures is at most ≃ 2 − 2.5 physical kpc in diam- eter, if one includes the faintest pixels), compared for ex- ample to the virial extent of the dark halo. The resolution of this image is 0.01 arcsecs (≃ 0.05 physical kpc), at least 10 times higher than the best resolution currently avail- able. As discussed before, for these results only cells with recombination rates higher or equal to 1051 s−1 are used. The initial frequency is chosen according to a Voigt profile that is sampled for each cell out to 10 Doppler widths and shifted around the bulk (peculiar + Hubble) velocity com- ponent along the direction of observation. The number of photons used (3 × 105) has been determined after a con- vergence study. Note that when we study the convergence with respect to the number of photons we take into account that this must be done in parallel with how far away in the wings we go when sampling the emission Voigt profile of each cell, since the higher the number of photons used the better one can sample frequencies further away from resonance. The convergence procedure gave the aforemen- tioned number of photons and initial emission frequency range (i.e., 10 thermal Doppler widths). NSN In the right panel of Figure 10, the frequency resolu- tion is λ/∆λ ∼ 50000. The line shape has converged, namely the peaks shown correspond to real velocity sub- structure. For example, the most pronounced peak at λ = 10952A corresponds to the component of the pecu- liar velocity along the direction of observation of the most luminous pixel of the image shown at the left panel (with coordinates on the image (0.24,-0.42) arcsecs, roughly). The dominant contribution to this pixel comes from the highest recombination cell of the emitter with a recombi- nation rate equal to ≃ 1.3 × 1055 s−1 and a peculiar ve- locity component along the direction of observation equal Fig. 9. -- Maximum cooling Ly-α luminosity, Lcool, plotted against recombination Ly-α luminosity, Lrec, for all ART simula- tion cells within the virial extent of a Ly-α emitter at z ≃ 8. The cooling luminosity is the maximum possible Ly-α luminosity from cooling because it is derived assuming that all cooling radiation is emitted in Ly-α photons. The solid line shows the case where the two luminosities are equal. Since, as discussed in the text, only cells with luminosities roughly above 5 × 1050 photons s−1 contribute significantly to the luminosity of the emitter, this figure shows that recombination is dominant over cooling Ly-α radiation. with T5 the temperature in units of 105 K. This is com- pared with the recombination luminosity Lrec (≃ 0.68r) in Figure 9. Taking into account the results of the conver- gence test performed to specify what is the minimum cell luminosity that needs to be taken into account (∼ 5× 1050 s−1), we see that the cells which are relevant are cells where recombination processes dominate, as can be seen in Fig- ure 9. Namely, similar to previous studies (e.g., Fardal et al. 2001) we find that the cooling radiation Ly-α con- tribution is subdominant compared to the recombination contribution, hence in what follows we focus only on the latter. 3.2.3. Supernovae Remnants (SNR) A Ly-α source that yields Ly-α photons both from re- combinations and collisional excitations is supernova rem- nants (SNR). Shull & Silk (1979) have computed the time- averaged Ly-α luminosity of a population of Type II SNR using a radiative-shock code. They find that the Ly-α lu- minosity of a galaxy due to SNR is LSN R = 3×1043n−0.5 0 ergs/s, with nH the ambient density in cm−3, E0 the typi- cal supernova energy in units of 1051, and NSN the number of supernova per year. Strictly speaking, this quantity also depends on the assumptions on the IMF, and the lower and upper stellar masses of the mass range over which the IMF is to be integrated. This expression includes both contributions, from recombination and collisional emission mechanisms: from UV and X-ray ionization (coming from the hot SNR interior) of the surrounding medium and from H E0.75 18 TASITSIOMI to 0.27 × 10−3 the speed of light. As mentioned, for each emission cell the Voigt profile was used and sampled up to 10 thermal Doppler widths. The total width of the line however is dominated by the bulk velocity structure of the emitter. The full width of the line at the minimum flux level shown in the figure (10−22 ergs s−1 cm−2 A−1) is roughly 15A (with the width if bulk velocities are set to zero being less than half this). This width corresponds to projected velocities along the direction of observation roughly in the [−200, 200] km/s range (this is just approx- imate, note however that the line is not symmetric around the rest frame resonance). This velocity range is what is expected given the peculiar velocities of the emitting cells. Also shown is the spectrum of the smallest of the two substructures (dotted line) of the image shown in the left panel. One can easily infer what the spectrum of the large Ly-α substructure looks like. The results discussed in this section may be specific to the emitter at hand, but the considerations themselves are pretty general. The same kind of procedure must be re- peated for each individual emitter identified in the simu- lations. 3.4. The Ly-α emitter after RT It is interesting to first treat the emitter as a finite con- figuration. In this case, as soon as the photons exit this configuration (whose size is taken to be roughly equal to the virial extent of the object, namely 10 physical kpc) they travel towards the observer. In other words at first we ignore the effect of the GP absorption. This context is pretty similar to that of §2.2 and §2.2.3. We focus on the emergent spectrum shown with the solid line in the left panel of Figure 11 . The spectrum converges if 3 × 105 photons are used, namely if the same number of photons are used as the number of photons needed for the initial emission results (discussed in §3.3) to converge. Of course, the higher the number of photons the better one samples low intensity wavelengths. We find that the number of photons used affects wavelength ranges with flux less than about 10−22 ergs s−1 cm−2 A−1. The spectrum shown in Figure 11 is produced using 107 photons. The spectral resolution used in the figure is λ/∆λ ≃ 5000, whereas the spectrum is identical if ten times better resolution is used. We have performed a large set of convergence tests among which the most interesting are for different (smaller) cores for the acceleration scheme discussed in §2.3.2, and /or a larger minimum τ0φ(xi) for which the acceleration scheme dis- cussed in §2.3.1 is used. Our results are pretty robust, as should following the discussion in §2.3.1 and 2.3.2 with respect to the one cell convergence results. Even though meant for a slab, it is interesting to check if some predictions of the Neufeld solution, such as the fre- quency where the spectrum has a maximum (≃ 0.9(ατ0)1/3), are roughly in agreement with the spectrum of the simu- lated emitter. Of course, the Ly-α emitter environment is neither isothermal nor homogeneous, and it is not ob- vious how to define an 'effective' temperature and opti- cal depth for these purposes. Thus, focusing on order of magnitude checks, setting the expression for the frequency where the peak emission occurs in a slab equal to the fre- quency where the spectrum of the emitter peaks (say in red wavelengths) one finds that the 'effective' optical depth and 'effective' temperature of the equivalent slab (i.e., the slab that would give a spectrum with peak at the frequen- cies where the emitter spectrum peaks) roughly satisfy the relation τ0T ≃ 1.4 × 1010 with T measured in eV. The ef- fective optical depth will be at least equal to the most optically thick cell the photon found itself in. Since the emission originates from the most optically thick cells (see Figure 8), τ0 will be at least 103. If we assume for ex- ample a temperature T = 105K, the above relation yields τ0 ≃ 109 which is roughly the optical depth from the center of the object to its virial radius along the direction of ob- servation. Thus, the maximum of the spectrum is roughly where it is expected to be if one assumes the scaling from the Neufeld solution (≃ 2550 km/s). The emerging spectrum looks pretty similar to the spec- trum that would emerge from a static configuration, namely it has two quite similar peaks, one to the red and one to the blue of the Ly-α resonance. Note however that the peaks are not really symmetric, since the flux decreases more rapidly near the resonance. The width of the blue peak at a flux level of 10−22 ergs s−1 cm−2 A−1 is roughly 180 A or ≃ 5000 km/s. We obtain quite a similar spectrum if we set the bulk velocity field to zero in the code, that is kinematics do not seem to play a crucial role in this case. In the case of the specific Ly-α emitter and for the specific direction of observation, analyzing the bulk velocity field (i.e., the peculiar velocity field since the Hubble expan- sion is negligible at the distances we are working) we find that there is some net infalling motion, but with signifi- cant transverse velocity components as well. Hence, the obtained static -- like spectrum does not come as a surprise. Furthermore, the peak asymmetry due to the existence of bulk fields depends on the relative magnitudes of the bulk and thermal velocities (e.g., if the bulk velocity is close to the thermal we do not expect a significant asymmetry since one scattering can give, e.g., a red photon moving in a con- tracting medium a large enough shift to erase the effect of the contraction) which varies from cell to cell, and it also depends on the optical thickness. Since thermal velocities are typically small compared to bulk velocities in simula- tions, the optical thickness is a more crucial factor. For such extremely optically thick media where the spectrum is expected to have in the context of the Neufeld solution a typical frequency of ≃ 2550 km/s, bulk velocities of at most some hundreds km/s will not really favor blue versus red photons (even if the bulk motion was purely inwards) that much, since both red and blue photons see a very optically thick medium. It would be interesting to have a sense of what is the number of scatterings each photon undergoes before exit- ing. With the acceleration methods that we have to use though it is difficult to keep track of this quantity. A simple way to obtain an order-of-magnitude idea of the number of scatterings in such or, at least, similar configu- rations can be obtained by one of the examples discussed in §2.2.3. For the most optically thick case (τ0 ≃ 8.3×106) and a point source emitting photons that propagate in a stationary medium the number of scatterings in one run of ≃ 2000 photons varies from 2.5×103 up to 4×107, with an average of 8.3× 106, and a median of 6.6× 106. Two thirds of the photons are in the [4.6 × 106, 2.1 × 107] scatterings Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 19 Fig. 10. -- Left panel: Image of Ly-α direct emission (i.e., assuming the Ly-α photons escape directly to the observer after they are produced). The approximately 1.4 × 1.4 arcsecs2 (≃ 6.5 × 6.5 physical kpc) field corresponds to roughly one third of the virial extent of the dark matter halo where the emitter lives. The surface brightness (SB) is bolometric and in units of ergs s−1cm−2arcsecs−2. The SB color scale is logarithmic. The object had undergone a recent merger, that is why there are two distinct luminous blobs that dominate the emission. Right panel: Initial Ly-α injection spectrum. Shown are the total spectrum (solid line), namely the spectrum for the image shown in the left panel, and the spectrum of the smallest of the two blobs in the image (dotted line). Note that the wavelength is in 104A (i.e., µm). The dashed line shows the Ly-α resonance for z ≃ 8. See text for discussion of the structure of the line. range. More generally, we find that similar to the Neufeld problem, the average number of scatterings in this spheri- cal configuration scales linearly with optical depth at such thick media (see discussion in §2.2.1), with the proportion- ality constant of order unity. From this linear scaling of the average number of scatterings with optical depth, one can obtain a rough idea of the average number of scat- terings of photons in the simulation environments (for the cell optical depth range in the simulations see, e.g., the left panel of Figure 8). These numbers also make clear why it is absolutely not feasible to perform Ly-α RT in the much thicker and more complicated simulation envi- ronments without some acceleration schemes. Photons at very optically thick regions have to shift off resonance significantly to escape, and hence are the ones responsible for the significant line width of the spectrum (along with the 1/x2 behavior of the wing optical depth, as discussed previously). It is meaningful to ask whether one should really care about these photons, or instead ig- nore them because may be they are trapped indefinitely (for any practical purpose) in the dense cells and do not participate in the radiation propagation. To answer this question we estimate the photon diffusion time and com- pare it to the sound crossing and dynamical time scales (other time scales, such as the Hubble time scale for ex- ample which is ∼ 1 Gyr at z = 8 are clearly large enough to be non-relevant). Same as with the number of scat- terings, to find the exact diffusion times one should fol- low the detailed RT. Given our acceleration methods this is not done. Instead we use some useful scalings. Since the average number of scatterings in very optically thick media is roughly equal to τ0, then the diffusion time is roughly td ≃ Nsclmf p/c with lmf p the mean free path be- tween scatterings defined through hτi = R ∞ 0 τ e−τ dτ = 1. In other words, since τ0 = nσ(x = 0)L, τ = nσ(x)l, then the mean free path in units of the total (half) width of the slab is σ(x = 0)/σ(x)1/τ0, with σ(x = 0) the cross section at the line center and σ(x) the cross section calculated at an effective x so that the above definition for the mean free path is valid. Substituting in the expression for td we obtain td ∼ σ(x = 0)/σ(x)L/c. For a slab with τ0 = 106 we obtain a mean number of scatterings equal to 9.5× 105 and a median equal to 7.2 × 105, whereas 67% of the pho- tons have between 5.1× 105 and 2.3× 106 scatterings. For the mean free path we find a mean equal to 2.4 × 10−5, a median equal to 1.9 × 10−6 and 67% of the scatterings correspond to mean free paths between 1.4 × 10−6 and 7.7 × 10−6, all in units of the (half) width of the slab L. For the total distance traveled by the photons before escaping, we find an average distance of 40.2, a median of 32.3 -- implying a σ(x = 0)/σ(x) ratio of order 10 -- whereas 67% of photons exit after traveling a distance be- tween 16.7 and 96.3, with these numbers as before in units of the width of the slab. Based on spatial random walk arguments one would have Nsc ∼ τ 2 0 , hence the distance before escape would be ∼ τ0 or 106 for the specific exam- ple we use here. However, as discussed in §2.2.1 Nsc scales linearly with τ0 and this makes a big difference. We find that the sound crossing time is significantly higher than the dynamical time for most simulation cells, hence the latter is the relevant time against which the diffusion time must be compared. We find that the dynamical time scale 20 TASITSIOMI Fig. 11. -- Left panel: Emerging Ly-α emission spectrum before adding the Ly-α Gunn-Peterson absorption (GPA) (no GPA, solid line), with the GPA but without the red damping wing (GP, no DW, short-dashed line), and with GPA and the damping wing (GPA+DW, dotted line). Note that the wavelength is in 104A (i.e., µm). The long-dashed line shows the Ly-α resonance for z ≃ 8. Right panel: Image of the Ly-α emitter after RT, GPA and DW. The 1.4 × 1.4 arcsecs2 (≃ 6.5 × 6.5 physical kpc) field corresponds to roughly one third of the virial extent of the dark matter halo where the emitter lives. The surface brightness (SB) is bolometric and in units of ergs s−1cm−2arcsecs−2. The SB color scale is logarithmic. is at least three orders of magnitude or more larger than L/c which is within a factor of order 102 -- for the various physical conditions in the simulation cells -- representa- tive of td. Note that this comparison also justifies the use of 'static' simulation outputs where the RT is performed, even though we plan on investigating the possibility of in- corporating the RT scheme into the dynamical evolution in the simulations. Furthermore, the effect of the simula- tion resolution on these conclusions will be investigated in a future study. The scattering process diffuses the initial number of emitted photons on a larger area and hence lowers the number surface brightness (i.e., number per s cm2 arcsec2 rather than energy per s cm2 arcsec2). In general the sur- face brightness itself can go either up or down, depend- ing for example on the velocity structure of the medium. To quantify this effect on a photon-by-photon basis we choose to calculate the distance on the plane of the image between the initial emission point and the point (pixel) where the photon makes its maximum contribution to the image (see §2.4 on how spectra and images are obtained). We find that these distances vary from roughly 10−3 to 10 physical kpc, with a median of 0.27 kpc and a mean of 0.31 kpc. Given that the largest of the two emission re- gions has a diameter of ∼ 2− 2.5 physical kpc (see, Figure 10), this means that the 'size' of the luminous part of the object increases on average by more that 10% due to scat- tering. If, instead, we focus on the region where a certain fraction of photons originates from we obtain quite similar results. For example, ignoring the effects of RT, 90% of the emitted photons that would reach the observer would originate within a radius of roughly 2.5 physical kpc. The same percentage of photons after taking into account RT would come from a radius of roughly 2.9 physical kpc.10 So far we have been ignoring the GP absorption. When adding this absorption we consider two distinct cases. In the first case we include the red damping wing of the GP absorption, and in the second case we set it equal to zero. The latter best-case scenario is what would happen if for example the emitter was inside the HII region of a very bright quasar. The spectrum obtained in the first case is shown with the dotted line in the left panel of Figure 11, whereas the spectrum in the second case is shown with the short dashed line. An image of the emitter as would appear on earth with the GP absorption and the damping wing included is shown in the right panel of Figure 11. Not surprisingly, when the damping wing is not taken into account the spectrum is identical with that before the GP absorption with the difference that all flux blueward of the Ly-α resonance is missing. When including the damp- ing wing the maximum flux is suppressed by roughly a factor of 61.7 with respect to the maximum flux without it. This line is still quite wide, with a width of approxi- mately 1370 km/s at a flux level of 10−21 ergs s−1 cm−2 A−1, and a FWHM roughly 620 km/s. Lastly, these results have converged with respect to both the number of photons and the radius where the detailed RT stops (and beyond which the GP absorption is added). More specifically, we find that the number of photons re- quired for the initial (no RT) emission to converge (3×105) 10 Note that the pixels in the right panel of Figure 11 that give the impression of a diffusion of the photons due to scattering possibly larger than our ∼ 10% estimate, correspond to pixels with practically zero number of photons. Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 21 is enough for the with RT and GP absorption results. And, the results also converge if a 10 physical kpc radius is used for the detailed RT and beyond that the GP absorption is added. Convergence has been checked also with respect to the minimum cell initial luminosity considered. We find that the results converge if the minimum luminosity dis- cussed in §3.2 in the context of initial emission convergence is used. 3.5. Some additional physics considerations Here we discuss the importance of collisions while the photons are propagating, as well as the possible role of dust (currently not taken into account). 3.5.1. Collisions While the photons are undergoing scattering, collisions should be considered in the following three contexts: (i) collisional redistribution within the n = 2 state; if for ex- ample a collision makes the atom go from the 2P3/2 to the 2S1/2, then the Ly-α photon is destroyed through a 2 photon decay of the 2S1/2 state. If instead the collision takes it to the 2P1/2, the scattering phase function will be different and hence it is relevant in either case to see how probable the collisional redistribution is (ii) collisional de- excitation of the n = 2, in which case the photon is lost (iii) collisional broadening of the line, which could cause non-coherence in the rest frame of the atom. The RT code can take all these processes into account, but here we de- velop some intuition as to their importance. In fact, since, as will be shown, these processes are in practice negligi- ble, the corresponding calculations in the RT code were switched off when producing the results presented in this study. Referring to cases (i) and (ii), the largest collisional cross sections are for momentum changing transitions (∆L = ±1; e.g., Osterbrock 1989). As discussed already, both collisions with electrons and protons are relevant, but pro- tons are more significant in case (i), whereas electrons are more significant in case (ii). We have already calculated the probability per scattering that the 2P → 2S transition of case (i) happens (see equation (26)). The maximum value of this probability for the conditions of the simu- lation cells is roughly 10−10 (assuming T4 = 1, np = 102 cm−3, with the latter being of the order of the maximum proton number density of cells in simulations. The temper- ature dependence is so weak that it does not really matter what temperature one assumes, for order of magnitude estimates). So, unless a photon undergoes 1010 scatter- ings, collisions of the type (i) should not matter. The cells that are relevant for this are optically thick cells where the photons scatter repeatedly. Since as we saw Nsc ≃ τ0 and none of the simulation cells has τ0 larger than a few times 109, collisions should not have a significant impact. Note that for most cells the number of scatterings for which col- lisions may start to matter is orders of magnitude higher than 1010 (i.e., what is described above is the worst case scenario as far as the effect of collisions is concerned since it assumes the maximum proton number density, present in very few cells). If these collisions do not matter then collisions of type (ii), which have smaller cross sections, should not matter either. In case (iii), if the atom suffers collisions with other particles while it is emitting, the phase of the emitted radiation can be altered suddenly. If the phase changes completely randomly at the collision times, then informa- tion about the emitting radiation is lost and coherence is destroyed. In this case, in the rest frame of the atom, the line profile is Lorentzian but the total width is the natural width plus the frequency of collisions the atom experiences on average. Since the importance of this effect as well is determined by a comparison of the radiative decay time and the time between collisions (i.e., equation 26), from the above discussion it becomes clear that it is also negli- gible. 3.5.2. Dust Dust absorbs Ly-α photons. Thus, one would assume that dust in the presence of scattering that traps photons, could have a significant effect, and that this may be true even if it is present in small amounts, as is expected to be the case for the z ≃ 8 emitter we discuss (with a metal- licity roughly equal to 0.1 the solar metallicity). Indeed, Charlot & Fall (1991) found that only a tiny fraction of Ly- α photons escape from a static, neutral ISM even if there is a tiny amount of dust present. To include the effect of dust absorption in simulations we will have to implement a recipe to estimate the amount of dust. Even though one can come up with an observationally motivated recipe (albeit with unknown applicability at redshifts as high as 8), we postpone such a treatment for a future study, since the main focus of the current study is the Ly-α RT scheme (which nevertheless includes the probability per scattering that the photon will be absorbed, but this probability is currently set to 0). However, the Ly-α emitter results we present in this study should not be taken as unrealistic, since it is not obvious how these results will change if we include the ef- fects of dust. More specifically, many starforming galaxies are observed to have significant Ly-α luminosities (e.g., Kunth et al. 1998; Pettini et al. 2000), and this is usually attributed to the presence of galactic winds in these sys- tems that allow the Ly-α photons to escape after much fewer scatterings than in the static medium case. These data seem to support the idea that it is the kinematics of the gas rather than the dust content that is the dominant Ly-α escape regulator. Furthermore, Neufeld (1991) found that under suitable conditions the effects of dust absorption may actually in- crease rather than diminish the observed Ly-α line strength relative to radiation that suffers little or no scattering. This would happen for example in a multiphase medium consisting of dusty clumps of neutral hydrogen embedded within a relatively 'transparent' medium. If most of the dust lies in cold neutral clouds then Ly-α photons, not be- ing able to penetrate those clumps, will not be affected as much by the presence of dust (see also Hansen & Oh 2005). Although there is no direct observational evidence to sup- port this structure for the ISM (i.e., that dust lies preferen- tially in cold, neutral hydrogen clumps, even though the clumpiness in the distribution of neutral hydrogen itself seems to be established observationally (see Hansen & Oh 2005, and references therein)), such a morphology of the dust and atomic hydrogen distribution could help account for the lack of strong correlation between dust content -- inferred from metallicity or submillimeter emission -- and 22 TASITSIOMI Ly-α equivalent width. For example, some dust-rich galax- ies have substantially higher Ly-α escape fraction than less dusty emitters (Kunth et al. 1998, 2003). In addition, Gi- avalisco et al. (1996) found that there is no correlation between the Ly-α equivalent widths and the slope of the UV continuum, which is a measure of the continuum ex- tinction and hence of dust content. Another reason why it is not obvious how the results presented here will change if we take dust into account, is that in the current version of the ART code molecular hydrogen forms only through the catalytic action of elec- trons. When molecular hydrogen formation on grains is included in the code, some of what is currently taken to be neutral atomic hydrogen will transform into molecular hydrogen, hence this effect will decrease the optical thick- ness of what currently are the thickest cells. 4. summary We develop a Ly-α RT code applicable to gasdynam- ics cosmological simulations. High resolution, along with appropriately treated cooling can lead to very optically thick environments. Solving the Ly-α RT even for one very thick simulation cell takes a long time. Solving it for the whole simulation box, or a significant fraction of it, takes unrealistic time. Thus, we develop accelerating schemes to speed up the RT. We treat the moderately thick cells by skipping the numerous core scatterings which are not associated with any significant spatial diffusion, and go directly to the scattering that takes the photon outside of the core. We use depth dependent core definitions, and find that quite large core values can be used. For the very optically thick cells we motivate our treatment from the classical problem of resonant radiation transfer in a semi- infinite slab. We find that with some modifications, since the simulations have cubic cells rather than slabs, we can use the analytical solution derived by Neufeld (1990) for the problem of the semi-infinite slab. With these acceler- ating methods, along with the parallelization of the code we made the problem of Ly-α RT in the complex environ- ments of cosmological simulations tractable and solvable. Even though our approach assumes a cell structure for the simulation outputs, as is inherently the case in AMR codes, the Ly-α RT code we discuss is applicable to out- puts from all kinds of cosmological simulation codes. This is true since one can always create an effective mesh by in- terpolating the values of the various physical parameters. We perform a series of tests of the RT code, and then we apply it to ART cosmological simulations. We focus on the brightest emitter in those simulations at z ≃ 8. A first interesting result for this emitter pertains to its intrinsic emission region and mechanisms. The emission region consists of two smaller regions, each corresponding to one of the two main progenitors that merged to form the emitter at z ≃ 8. Both regions are pretty small, with the larger of the two having a diameter of 2 − 2.5 physical kpc. Furthermore, recombination produced Ly-α photons is the dominant intrinsic Ly-α emission mechanism, with collisional excitation and SNR produced Ly-α photons be- ing subdominant. The intrinsic luminosity of the emitter is 4.8 × 1043 ergs/s, whereas the injection spectrum (i.e., initial emission spectrum) shows significant velocity struc- ture. After performing the Ly-α RT, but before adding the GP absorption, the emitter spectrum obtained resembles that of a very optically thick static configuration, despite the slight trend for inward radial motions. More specif- ically, we obtain the usual double horn spectrum. This happens because (i) even though there is some net inward radial motion, there are still significant tangential peculiar velocity components, and (ii) the optical depth is so high that velocities of order some hundreds km/s will not fa- vor blue versus red photons (i.e., in order to escape, both kinds of photons have to shift off resonance much more than the shift because of peculiar velocities, thus none of the two kinds of photons is favored in particular because of the existence of bulk motions). Namely, the velocity information is in fact lost because of the extremely high optical depth. The width of the two horns is noticeably high (∼ 5000 km/s), but in agreement with what is ex- pected for the high simulation column densities. The size of the emitter increases, since the scatterings disperse the photons on a larger area. We find that on the plane of the emitter image, a photon on average escapes at a distance of about 10% of the initial (before RT) emitter size from the point it was originally emitted. We include the GP absorption in two different ways: without and with the red damping wing. In the first case the spectrum is identical to that when the GP is not in- cluded, with the difference that now we get only the red peak (rather than both the red and blue peaks). This case would correspond to the situation where the Ly-α emit- ter lies within the HII region of a very bright quasar. In the second case, where the damping wing is taken into ac- count, the red peak is also affected. Its maximum flux is suppressed compared to when no damping wing is used by roughly a factor of 61.7. The resulting line after including the wing is still quite broad with a velocity width of about 1350 km/s at a flux level of 10−21ergs s−1 cm−2 A−1, and a FWHM of about 620 km/s. The line is quite displaced redward from the Ly-α resonance, and reach a maximum monochromatic flux of 10−20.2 ergs s−1 cm−2 A−1. Attempting a detailed comparison with existing obser- vations, or discussing detection prospects for an object such as the simulated emitter is beyond the scope of this study. We have studied only one emitter, and this for only one direction of observation since our main goal was to use it as an application for the Ly-α RT code. Thus, we do not have a large enough and representative simulation sam- ple yet. Furthermore, currently the highest redshift where a Ly-α line has been observed is ∼ 6.6 (Kodaira et al. 2003)11 and it is not known how different the properties of higher redshift emitters are from that of lower redshift ones. The most recent report at z = 9 is that of Willis & Courbin (2005). This study finds no detections. The sky area coverage is possibly a significant factor contributing to this no detection result. Instead, we content ourselves here with a simple order of magnitude comparison. The intrinsic Ly-α luminosity of our emitter is consistent with luminosities reported in literature. For example, the high- est Ly-α luminosity of the z = 5.7 sample of Hu et al. 11 The detection of a z = 10 Ly-α emitting galaxy was recently reported by Pell´o et al. (2004) following a color selected survey for z > 7 galaxies located behind a well studied gravitational lens clus- ter, but the exact nature of this source remains contentious (e.g., Weatherley et al. 2004) Ly-α radiative transfer in cosmological simulations 23 (2004) is roughly 6× 1043 ergs/s. Higher luminosities than those have been inferred for Ly-α blobs, rather than emit- ters. For example, the most luminous blob in the sample of Matsuda et al. (2004) has a Ly-α luminosity of 1.1×1044 ergs/s. Most observed Ly-α emitters are unresolved and so is expected to be the simulated emitter. Reported sizes for the observed objects are in the ∼ few kpc range (e.g., Hu et al. 2002). Ly-α blobs on the other hand are quite more extended, with sizes ∼ 100 kpc (Matsuda et al. 2004). The widths of the (lower z) observed lines are typically a few hundred km/s, whereas the FWHM of the simulated line is roughly 620 km/s. As discussed already, the ve- locity width of the ART emitter could be affected by the very high H column densities which will drop as soon as molecular hydrogen formation on dust grains is taken into account. In terms of the detectability, if one adopts the present day limit of ground based detections of ∼ 10−18 ergs s−1 cm−2 A−1, clearly our simulated emitter would be orders of magnitude fainter. If the emitter is embedded within the HII region of a bright quasar, in which case the red damping wing will be suppressed, the brightness is marginally below the sensitivity of current ground based instruments. Note, however, that the prospects of detec- tion will be much better for JWST which is expected to be able to detect ∼ 400 times fainter objects than currently studied with ground based infrared telescopes. I am grateful to N. Y. Gnedin and A.V. Kravtsov for many useful discussions and guidance, for comments on the manuscript, and for allowing me to use their simula- tions. I would like to thank P. Jonsson, D. Neufeld, J. Rhoads, Y. Tanigucchi, and Z. Zheng for fast and compre- hensive responses to my questions. This work benefited greatly from my interaction with J. Carlstrom, A. Konigl, and A.V. Olinto, and was supported by the National Sci- ence Foundation (NSF) under grants ASTR 02-06216 and ASTR 02-39759, by NASA through grants NAG5-13274 and NAG5-12326, and by the Kavli Institute for Cosmo- logical Physics at the University of Chicago. The au- thor also acknowledges support through an award from the Onassis Foundation. The simulations discussed were performed on Linux Clusters and IBM690 arrays at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications and the San Diego Supercomputer Center under the National Part- nership for Advanced Computational Infrastructure grant #MCA03S023. This work was presented as part of a dissertation to the Department of Astronomy and Astro- physics, The University of Chicago, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. REFERENCES Adams, T. F. 1972, ApJ, 174, 439 Ahn, S., Lee, H., & Lee, H. M. 2001, ApJ, 554, 604 -- . 2002, ApJ, 567, 922 Auer, L. H. 1968, ApJ, 153, 783 Avery, L. W. & House, L. L. 1968, ApJ, 152, 493 Barton, E. J., Dav´e, R., Smith, J.-D. T., Papovich, C., Hernquist, L., & Springel, V. 2004, ApJ, 604, L1 Bouwens, R. J., Thompson, R. I., Illingworth, G. D., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P., Fan, X., Dickinson, M. E., Eisenstein, D. J., & Rieke, M. J. 2004, ApJ, 616, L79 Bower, R. G., Morris, S. L., Bacon, R., Wilman, R. J., Sullivan, M., Chapman, S., Davies, R. L., de Zeeuw, P. T., & Emsellem, E. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 63 Cantalupo, S., Porciani, C., Lilly, S. J., & Miniati, F. 2005, astro- ph/0504015 Cashwell, E. & Everett, C. 1959, Monte Carlo Method for Random Walk Problems (New York: Pergamon Press) Chandrasekhar, S. 1960, Radiative Transfer (New York: Dover Publications) Charlot, S. & Fall, S. M. 1991, ApJ, 378, 471 -- . 1993, ApJ, 415, 580 Delliou, M. L., Lacey, C., Baugh, C. M., Guiderdoni, B., Bacon, R., Courtois, H., Sousbie, T., & Morris, S. L. 2005a, MNRAS, 357, L11 Delliou, M. L., Lacey, C., Baugh, C. M., & Morris, S. L. 2005b, astro-ph/0508186 Dickinson, M. et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, L99 Dijkstra, M., Haiman, Z., & Spaans, M. 2005a, astro-ph/0510407 -- . 2005b, astro-ph/0510409 Fardal, M. A., Katz, N., Gardner, J. P., Hernquist, L., Weinberg, D. H., & Dav´e, R. 2001, ApJ, 562, 605 Field, G. B. 1959, ApJ, 129, 551 Furlanetto, S. R., Schaye, J., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2003, ApJ, 599, L1 -- . 2005, ApJ, 622, 7 Giavalisco, M., Koratkar, A., & Calzetti, D. 1996, ApJ, 466, 831 Gnedin, N. Y. & Abel, T. 2001, New Astronomy, 6, 437 Gnedin, N. Y. & Prada, F. 2004, ApJ, 608, L77 Gould, A. & Weinberg, D. H. 1996, ApJ, 468, 462 Haiman, Z. & Spaans, M. 1999, ApJ, 518, 138 Haiman, Z., Spaans, M., & Quataert, E. 2000, ApJ, 537, L5 Hamilton, D. R. 1940, Physical Review, 58, 122 Hansen, M. & Oh, S. P. 2005, astro-ph/0507586 Harrington, J. P. 1973, MNRAS, 162, 43 Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., Capak, P., McMahon, R. G., Hayashino, T., & Komiyama, Y. 2004, AJ, 127, 563 Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., McMahon, R. G., Capak, P., Iwamuro, F., Kneib, J.-P., Maihara, T., & Motohara, K. 2002, ApJ, 568, L75 Hui, L. & Gnedin, N. Y. 1997, MNRAS, 292, 27 Hui, L., Gnedin, N. Y., & Zhang, Y. 1997, ApJ, 486, 599 Hummer, D. G. 1962, MNRAS, 125, 21 Jefferies, J. T. & White, O. R. 1960, ApJ, 132, 767 Kodaira, K. et al. 2003, PASJ, 55, L17 Kravtsov, A. V. 2003, ApJ, 590, L1 Kravtsov, A. V. & Gnedin, O. Y. 2005, ApJ, 623, 650 Kunth, D., Leitherer, C., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Ostlin, G., & Petrosian, A. 2003, ApJ, 597, 263 Kunth, D., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Terlevich, E., Terlevich, R., Lequeux, J., & Fall, S. M. 1998, A&A, 334, 11 Loeb, A. & Rybicki, G. B. 1999, ApJ, 524, 527 Maier, C. 2002, Ph.D. Thesis, Naturwissenschaftlich-Mathematische Gesamtfakultat der Universitat Heidelberg, Germany Matsuda, Y. et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 569 Neufeld, D. A. 1990, ApJ, 350, 216 -- . 1991, ApJ, 370, L85 Osterbrock, D. E. 1962, ApJ, 135, 195 -- . 1989, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (Mill Valey, CA: Univ. Sci.) Partridge, R. B. & Peebles, P. J. E. 1967, ApJ, 147, 868 Pell´o, R., Schaerer, D., Richard, J., Le Borgne, J.-F., & Kneib, J.-P. 2004, A&A, 416, L35 Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Dickinson, M., & Giavalisco, M. 2000, ApJ, 528, 96 Phillips, K. C. & Meszaros, P. 1986, ApJ, 310, 284 Rhoads, J. E., Dey, A., Malhotra, S., Stern, D., Spinrad, H., Jannuzi, B. T., Dawson, S., Brown, M. J. I., & Landes, E. 2003, AJ, 125, 1006 Santos, M. R. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1137 Santos, M. R., Ellis, R. S., Kneib, J., Richard, J., & Kuijken, K. 2003, ApJ, 606, 683 Shull, J. M. & Silk, J. 1979, ApJ, 234, 427 Spergel, D. N. et al. 2003, ApJS, 148, 175 Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium (New Yorl: Wiley) Stanway, E. R., Bunker, A. J., McMahon, R. G., Ellis, R. S., Treu, T., & McCarthy, P. J. 2004, ApJ, 607, 704 Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., & Giavalisco, M. 2000, ApJ, 532, 170 Taniguchi, Y. et al. 2005, PASJ, 57, 165 Tasitsiomi, A. 2006, astro-ph/0601562 Unno, W. 1952, PASJ, 4, 100 Weatherley, S. J., Warren, S. J., & Babbedge, T. S. R. 2004, A&A, 428, L29 Willis, J. P. & Courbin, F. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 1348 Wouthuysen, S. A. 1952, AJ, 57, 31 Yusef-Zadeh, F., Morris, M., & White, R. L. 1984, ApJ, 278, 186 Zanstra, H. 1949, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 11, 1 Zheng, Z. & Miralda-Escud´e, J. 2002, ApJ, 578, 33
0804.3823	2	0804	2008-08-07T06:52:10	A Global Stability Analysis of Clusters of Galaxies with Conduction and AGN Feedback Heating	[ "astro-ph" ]	We investigate a series of steady-state models of galaxy clusters, in which the hot intracluster gas is efficiently heated by active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback and thermal conduction, and in which the mass accretion rates are highly reduced compared to those predicted by the standard cooling flow models. We perform a global Lagrangian stability analysis. We show for the first time that the global radial instability in cool core clusters can be suppressed by the AGN feedback mechanism, provided that the feedback efficiency exceeds a critical lower limit. Furthermore, our analysis naturally shows that the clusters can exist in two distinct forms. Globally stable clusters are expected to have either: 1) cool cores stabilized by both AGN feedback and conduction, or 2) non-cool cores stabilized primarily by conduction. Intermediate central temperatures typically lead to globally unstable solutions. This bimodality is consistent with the recently observed anticorrelation between the flatness of the temperature profiles and the AGN activity (Dunn & Fabian 2008) and the observation by Rafferty et al. (2008) that the shorter central cooling times tend to correspond to significantly younger AGN X-ray cavities.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version November 1, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 03/07/07 A GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES WITH CONDUCTION AND AGN FEEDBACK HEATING Fulai Guo1, S. Peng Oh 1 and M. Ruszkowski2 Draft version November 1, 2018 ABSTRACT We investigate a series of steady-state models of galaxy clusters, in which the hot intracluster gas is efficiently heated by active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback and thermal conduction, and in which the mass accretion rates are highly reduced compared to those predicted by the standard cooling flow models. We perform a global Lagrangian stability analysis. We show for the first time that the global radial instability in cool core clusters can be suppressed by the AGN feedback mechanism, provided that the feedback efficiency exceeds a critical lower limit. Furthermore, our analysis naturally shows that the clusters can exist in two distinct forms. Globally stable clusters are expected to have either: 1) cool cores stabilized by both AGN feedback and conduction, or 2) non-cool cores stabilized pri- marily by conduction. Intermediate central temperatures typically lead to globally unstable solutions. This bimodality is consistent with the recently observed anticorrelation between the flatness of the temperature profiles and the AGN activity (Dunn & Fabian 2008) and the observation by Rafferty et al. (2008) that the shorter central cooling times tend to correspond to significantly younger AGN X-ray cavities. Subject headings: conduction -- cooling flows -- galaxies: clusters: general -- galaxies: active -- insta- bilities -- X-rays: galaxies: clusters 1. INTRODUCTION Clusters of galaxies are the largest gravitationally bound systems in the universe. They are filled with hot gas with T ∼ 2 − 10 keV, which loses thermal en- ergy prolifically by emitting X-rays. The X-ray surface brightness of many galaxy clusters shows a strong cen- tral peak that was previously interpreted as the signa- ture of a cooling flow with mass accretion rates of up to several hundred M⊙ yr−1 (see Fabian 1994, for a re- view). Although the gas temperature is observed to de- cline toward cluster centers, recent high-resolution Chan- dra and XMM-Newton observations show a remarkable lack of emission lines from the gas at temperatures be- low about ∼ 1/3 of the ambient cluster temperature (e.g., Peterson et al. 2001, 2003; Tamura et al. 2001; for a review see Peterson & Fabian 2006). In addition, the spectroscopically determined mass deposition rates are significantly smaller than the classic values estimated from the X-ray luminosity within the cooling regions (Voigt & Fabian 2004). The absence of a cool phase in cores of galaxy clusters is suggestive of one or more heat- ing mechanisms maintaining the hot gas at keV temper- atures for a period at least comparable to the lifetime of galaxy clusters. Amongst the many candidate heating mechanisms put forth recently, there are two leading contenders: 1. thermal regions ter conduction of (e.g., from the to cluster the Bertschinger & Meiksin hot the outer cen- 1986; 1 Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Bar- bara, CA 93106, USA; E-mail: (SPO) [email protected] (FG); [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy, The University of Michigan, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; E-mail: [email protected] Zakamska & Narayan Voigt & Fabian 2004); 2003, hereafter ZN03; 2. heating of the intracluster medium (ICM) by out- flows, bubbles, or cosmic rays generated by AGNs at cluster centers (e.g., Bruggen & Kaiser 2002, Ruszkowski & Begelman 2002, Ruszkowski et al. 2004, Chandran & Rasera 2007, Guo & Oh 2008, Sijacki et al. 2008). 2003) Recent numerical work and 2001; Cho et al. (e.g. theoretical Narayan & Medvedev has shown that a turbulent magnetic field is not as efficient in suppressing thermal conduction as previously thought. In particular, Narayan & Medvedev (2001) showed that the effective thermal conductivity κ in a turbulent MHD medium is a substantial fraction (∼ 1/5) of the classical Spitzer value κSp if magnetic turbulence extends over at least two decades in scale. On the other hand, recent work shows that bouyancy instabilities could potentially strongly suppress conductivity in the cluster core (Quataert 2008; Parrish & Quataert 2008), a point we discuss in §4. Following this work, ZN03 shows that the electron density and temperature profiles of half of the clusters they investigated can be fitted by a pure conduction model with the conductivity suppression factor f ≡ κ/κSp ∼ 0.2 − 0.4. However, if only thermal conduction operates to balance the cooling, extreme fine-tuning of the conduction suppression factor f is required (Guo & Oh 2008; also see Bregman & David 1988): if f is too low, then a strong cooling flow develops, while if f is too high, the temperature profile becomes nearly isothermal, in contrast to observations of cool core clusters where the temperature invariably declines toward the cluster center. Furthermore, al- though thermal conduction is well known to stabilize short-wavelength perturbations against in- stability (e.g., Field 1965; Malagoli et al. 1987), the thermal 2 Guo et al. pure conduction models of the cool core clusters are thermally unstable against global perturbations (Soker 2003; Kim & Narayan 2003, hereafter KN03). Using a Lagrangian perturbation analysis, KN03 showed that the pure conduction model has one globally unstable radial mode with the instability growth (e-folding) time of ∼ 2 − 5 Gyr. Furthermore, if strong perturbations are applied (as would be the case in, for instance, a cluster merger), the growth times can be even shorter. Guo & Oh (2008) showed that if one started from arbitrary initial conditions (rather than an equilibrium solution), a catastrophic cooling flow quickly develops in a conduction-only model with a moderate level of conductivity. Fortunately, other sources of heating exist. A par- ticularly promising candidate is heating by the central AGN, for which observational evidence has been grow- ing in recent years (see McNamara & Nulsen 2007 for a recent review). A majority (∼ 71%) of cool core clus- ters harbor radio sources at their cluster centers (Burns 1990). Following the launch of Chandra and XMM- Newton, recent high-resolution X-ray observations also indicate that these radio sources are interacting with their surroundings and often displace the ICM, produc- ing X-ray cavities (e.g., Fabian et al. 2000, Bırzan et al. 2004, Forman et al. 2007). By contrast with conduction, heating by the dis- sipation of mechanical energy released by central AGNs provides a self-regulating feedback mechanism (e.g., Ciotti & Ostriker 2001, Ruszkowski & Begelman 2002, Brighenti & Mathews 2003, Kaiser & Binney 2003, Guo & Oh 2008). If AGN activity is triggered by cooling-induced gas accretion toward cluster centers, the AGN heating increases until it halts further accre- tion. Thus, the gas accretion rate is self-regulated as brief bursts of AGN activity alternate with cooling (e.g., Voit & Donahue 2005). Due to this AGN feedback heat- ing, the accretion flow may automatically adjust itself to a low value of the accretion rate, which depends mainly on the feedback efficiency ǫ (see equation 12), and, in a time-averaged sense, the ICM may reach a quasi- equilibrium state. This has been clearly demonstrated by Ruszkowski & Begelman (2002, hereafter RB02) in hy- drodynamic simulations, who showed that a model clus- ter heated by a combination of thermal conduction and AGN feedback does not suffer from the cooling catas- trophe, but instead relaxes to a stable quasi-equilibrium state. More recently, Guo & Oh (2008) proposed a new model of AGN feedback heating, where the ICM is effi- ciently heated by both thermal conduction and the cos- mic rays produced by accretion-triggered AGN activity. In their model, the ICM also relaxes to a stable steady state with the mass accretion rate highly reduced, and, more importantly, their results do not require fine tuning of the various adjustable parameters, including thermal conductivity and the AGN heating efficiency. Moreover, unlike the conduction-only case, the simulation relaxes to a stable state independent of the initial conditions. Al- though the detailed dynamics of how the released AGN energy is transferred into thermal energy of the ICM may be much more complicated than these models and is still poorly understood at the present time, these simulations strongly indicate that AGN feedback heating may poten- tially solve the fine-tuning problem associated with the pure conduction model. These simulations also suggest that AGN feedback heating plays a key role in suppressing global thermal instability in the ICM (see Rosner & Tucker 1989 for a local analysis). While local thermal instability may only produce small-scale structures (e.g., local mass dropout, emission-line filaments) in galaxy clusters, global ther- mal instability may result in a cooling catastrophe and a strong cooling flow. Thus, a successful model for the ICM must be globally stable, or at least only have in- stabilities which grow on extremely long timescales. In the present paper, we will use the Lagrangian pertur- bation method to formally investigate thermal insta- bility in quasi-equilibrium galaxy clusters with thermal conduction and AGN feedback heating. Global stabil- ity analysis is a method complementary to numerical simulations as it allows for the quick identification of global trends, quick systematic parameter search and helps to build physical intuition. For the spatial dis- tribution of AGN feedback heating, we adopt the ana- lytically tractable model proposed by Begelman (2001). This model has been compared with observations by Piffaretti & Kaastra (2006), who show that the model usually provides a satisfactory explanation of the ob- served structure of cool core clusters, although in a fair fraction of their sample the model provide relatively poor fits. However, our emphasis is not on the background so- lutions of this particular model but their global stability. With slight modification, our methods can be applied to any model of AGN feedback heating. We will show that the feedback mechanism can indeed effectively suppress global radial thermal instability in cool core (CC) clusters, provided that the AGN feed- back efficiency is larger than a lower limit (see § 3.3 and § 3.4 for details). We will also study the dependence of the cluster stability on the background ICM profiles (§ 3.5): for non-cool core (NCC) clusters, which have rel- atively flat temperature profiles and which are less stud- ied in the literature, the stabilizing effect of the feedback mechanism becomes small, but thermal conduction may completely suppress global thermal instability. Thus, we propose that thermal stability of the ICM favors two dis- tinct categories of cluster steady state profiles: CC clus- ters stabilized mainly by AGN feedback and NCC clus- ters stabilized by thermal conduction. Interestingly, X- ray observations suggest that clusters can be subdivided into two distinct categories according to the presence or absence of a cool core (e.g., Peres et al. 1998, Bauer et al. 2005, Sanderson et al. 2006, Chen et al. 2007). Our sta- bility analysis thus naturally explains these two distinct cluster categories. Our model is also consistent with the observation by Rafferty et al. (2008) who show that the short central cooling time corresonds to younger AGN (i.e., shorter X-ray cavity ages) and the anticorrelation between the flatness of the temperature profiles and the AGN activity recently reported by Dunn & Fabian 2008. The issue of the formation and evolution of NCC and CC clusters has recently been addressed by Burns et al. (2008) who performed large scale cosmological simula- tions. They found out that the CC and NCC clusters follow different evolutionary tracks, with CC clusters ac- creting more slowly over time and growing enhanced cool cores via hierarchical mergers. In contrast, they argued that NCC suffered early mergers that disrupted embry- A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 3 onic cool cores. However, this pioneering work does not include the effects of AGN to stop catastrophic cooling in the centers of CCs and the numerical resolution in their simulations is still too low (15.6h−1 kpc) to accurately study the stability and structure of the cores once they are formed. McCarthy et al. (2008) invoked different preheating histories to explain the difference between CC and NCC clusters. Like us, they find that AGN heating is required to stabilize CC clusters. Our present calcu- lations make the new suggestion that the bifircation be- tween CC and NCC clusters emerges naturally, from the fact that clusters with intermediate central temperatures are globally unstable. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In § 2, we describe the time-dependent equations of the ther- mal intracluster gas and construct a series of steady- state cluster models, in which the mass accretion rate is highly suppressed compared to that predicted by stan- dard cooling flow models. We then carry out a detailed formal linear stability analysis of local and global modes of thermal instability in steady-state galaxy clusters in § 3, where we also study the dependence of the clus- ter stability on the AGN feedback efficiency and on the background cluster profiles. We summarize our main re- sults in § 4 with a discussion of the implications. The cosmological parameters used throughout this paper are: Ωm = 0.3, ΩΛ = 0.7, h = 0.7. We have rescaled ob- servational results if the original paper used a different cosmology. where κ is the effective isotropic conductivity. Depending on the details of plasma magnetization and MHD turbu- lence, heat transport in the ICM may be very complex, and both electron conduction and turbulent mixing may contribute to heat transport (e.g., Lazarian 2006); ad- ditionally various instabilities could alter the nature of conductivity within the cooling region (Quataert 2008; Parrish & Quataert 2008). Since at present there is no consensus on the nature of conductivity in a turbulent magnetized plasma, we adopt the same assumption of Spitzer conductivity (with a factor f due to magnetic field suppression) that most authors do (e.g., ZN03, KN03), κ = f κSp, (5) where κSp is the classical Spitzer conductivity (Spitzer 1962), κSp = 1.84 × 10−5 ln λ T 5/2ergs s−1K−7/2cm−1, (6) with the usual Coulomb logarithm lnλ ∼ 37. In this paper, we assume that f (0 ≤ f ≤ 1) is constant in both space and time. According to the ideal gas law, the gas pressure is re- lated to the gas temperature T and the electron number density ne via 2. STEADY-STATE MODELS 2.1. Time-dependent equations P = ρkBT µmµ = µe µ nekBT, (7) In our model, the intracluster medium is subject to ra- diative cooling, AGN feedback heating and thermal con- duction. The governing hydrodynamic equations are dρ dt ρ dv dt + ρ∇ · v = 0, = −∇P − ρ∇Φ, (1) (2) 1 γ − 1 dP dt − γ γ − 1 P ρ dρ dt = H − ∇ · F − ρL, (3) where d/dt ≡ ∂/∂t + v · ∇ is the Lagrangian time derivative, ρ is the gas density, P is the gas pres- sure, v is the gas velocity, Φ is the gravitational po- tential, γ = 5/3 is the adiabatic index of thermal gas, ρL = n2 eT 1/2 ergs cm−3 s−1 is the volume cooling rate due to thermal bremsstrahlung3 (Rybicki & Lightman 1979; KN03), and F is the conduc- tive heat flux eΛ(T ) = 2.1 × 10−27n2 F = −κ∇T, (4) 3 We have simplified the form of the cooling function here, ig- noring the contribution of metal line cooling, which is important at lower temperatures. Fits to the full cooling function do ex- ist (Sutherland & Dopita 1993), but they complicate the analytic derivation of the global stability analysis. We have experimented with the full cooling function and didn't find qualitative changes to our results (see Fig. 11). where kB is Boltzmann's constant, mµ is the atomic mass unit, and µ and µe are the mean molecular weight per thermal particle and per electron, respectively. As in ZN03, we use µ = 0.62 and µe = 1.18, corresponding to a fully ionized gas with hydrogen fraction X = 0.7 and helium fraction Y = 0.28. In equation (2), we neglect the self-gravity of the gas and any dynamical effects of magnetic fields. The gravi- tational potential Φ is determined by the dark matter dis- tribution ρDM, which we assume has a modified Navarro- Frenk-White (NFW) form (Navarro et al. 1997) with a softened core (ZN03): ρDM(r) = M0/2π (r + rc)(r + rs)2 , (8) where rc is a softening radius which introduces a core in the dark matter distribution in the very inner regions, rs is the standard scale radius of the NFW profile and M0 is a characteristic mass. The corresponding gravitational potential is: Φ = −2GM0 rc (rs − rc)2 (cid:20)ln 1 + r/rc 1 + r/rs + ln(1 + r/rc) r/rc −2GM0 rs(rs − 2rc) rc(rs − rc)2 ln(1 + r/rs) r/rc , (cid:21) (9) where G is the gravitational constant. The parameters M0 and rs for a given cluster are obtained from the ob- served temperature in the outer regions of the cluster, 4 Guo et al. as described in ZN03. We adopt their calculated values of these two parameters and their best-fit values of rc directly. The term H in equation (3) is the volume heating rate due to AGN feedback. We adopt the "effervescent heating" mechanism proposed by Begelman (2001) to de- scribe the energy deposition into the ICM by the rising bubbles, which are produced by the central AGN. Be- cause of the non-negligible gas pressure gradient in the ICM, the bubbles will expand as they rise, doing pdV work and converting the internal bubble energy to kinetic energy of the ICM. The resulting disorganized motion of the ICM is quickly converted to heat. Assuming that this heating mechanism reaches a quasi-steady state, the de- tails of the bubble filling factor, rise rate and geometry should cancel. If the cavity expands adiabatically (see Guo & Oh (2008) for an alternative scenario), the lumi- nosity passing through the surface of a sphere at radius r is: E ∝ pb(r)(γb−1)/γbr, (10) where pb(r) is the pressure of buoyant gas inside bubbles, γb ≈ 4/3 is the adiabatic index of buoyant gas (assuming it is primarily composed of relativisitic plasma), and r is the unit vector along the radial direction. Assuming that the bubble rises subsonically so that pressure equilibrium is maintained, pb(r) = P (r), where P (r) is the thermal pressure of the ICM, we may rewrite equation (10) as: E ∼ Lagn(cid:18) P P0(cid:19)β r, (11) where P0 is the gas pressure at the cluster center, Lagn is the AGN mechanical luminosity, and β = (γb − 1)/γb. AGN activity is likely to be intermittent on a timescale of order the Salpeter time tS ∼ 107 yr, and possibly as short as ti ∼ 104 − 105 yr (Reynolds & Begelman 1997). Note that the bubble rise time is typically compa- rable to (at most several times) the sound crossing time tsc ∼ 108r100c−1 s,1000yr for a radius r ∼ 100r100 kpc and sound speed cs ∼ 1000cs,1000 km s−1 (e.g., see table 3 in Bırzan et al. (2004)), and is usually shorter than the gas cooling time. Thus, it is justifiable to treat AGN heating in a time-averaged sense and assume that the mechanical energy of central AGN is injected into the whole ICM in- stantaneously (e.g., RB02; Brighenti & Mathews 2003). We further assume the AGN mechanical luminosity to be Lagn = −ǫ Minc2, (12) where ǫ is the kinetic efficiency of AGN feedback, and Min = 4πr2 inρ0v0 is the mass accretion rate at the inner radius rin, where ρ0 and v0 are the density and radial velocity of thermal gas at rin, respectively. Therefore, the volume AGN heating rate H may be written as H ∼ −∇ · E 4πr2 ∼ ǫβ Minc2 4πr3 (cid:16)1 − e−r/r0(cid:17)(cid:18) P P0(cid:19)β ∂ ln P ∂ ln r , (13) where r0 is the inner heating cutoff radius, which is de- termined by the finite size of the central radio source (Ruszkowski & Begelman 2002; also see a discussion of r0 in Roychowdhury et al. 2005). In the rest of this pa- per, r0 is taken to be 20 kpc, unless otherwise stated. 2.2. Steady-state models In this subsection, we will construct steady-state clus- ter models, which will be used as initial unperturbed states in stability analysis presented in the next section. We assume that the cluster is spherically symmetric and time independent. Equations (1), (2) and (3) are thus simplified to M ≡ 4πr2ρv = constant, ρv dv dr = − dP dr − ρ dΦ dr , (14) (15) v γ − 1 dP dr − γ γ − 1 P v ρ dρ dr = H − 1 r2 d dr (r2F ) − ρL,(16) where v is the radial gas speed and F is the radial heat flux. Equations (4), (15) and (16) are three ordinary differ- ential equations for the three variables P (r), T (r) and r2F (r). We solve these equations as a boundary value problem between r = rin and rout, where we impose the boundary conditions: ne(rin) = n0, T (rin) = Tin, T (rout) = Tout, r2 inF (rin) = 0. (17) The first three conditions are taken from either the best- fit models of ZN03 or the observational data (see Table 1), while the last condition ensures that there are no sources or sinks of heat at the cluster center. Equations (4), (15), (16) and boundary conditions (17) form an M as the eigen- eigenvalue problem with either f , ǫ or value, provided that the other two are given as free model parameters. The results of the steady-state cluster mod- els presented in this subsection are not sensitive to the specific choices for the value of rin and rout; here we choose rin = 1 kpc and rout = 1000 kpc, unless otherwise stated. We note that the cluster stability does depend on the value of rin; this is degenerate with the choice of Tin, which is explored in § 3.5. We have experimented with different values of rout for our models (e.g., rout is taken to be 300 kpc in models of A2597; see Table 1), and find that the results of stability analysis are not sensitive to this choice. This is consistent with the extremely long gas cooling time in the cluster outer regions. To illustrate our results clearly, we need to define several physical quantities for each steady-state cluster A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 5 Parameters and results of the steady-state models for typical cool core clusters TABLE 1 Name A1795 a Tin (keV) 2 a Tout (keV) 7.5 a n0 (cm−3) Model 0.053 d A2199 1.6 5 0.074 A2052 1.3 3.5 0.035 e A2597 f 1 4 0.07 g M (M⊙/yr) −0.15 −0.15 −0.05 −0.015 −0.015 −0.00375 −0.006 −0.006 −0.0015 −0.32 −0.32 −0.16 −0.17 −0.14 ǫ 0 0.1 0.3 0 0.05 0.2 0 0.05 0.2 0 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 f 0.27 0.12 0.12 0.43 0.36 0.36 0.31 0.20 0.20 1.30 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.50 b nout (cm−3) 1.42 × 10−4 1.26 × 10−4 1.26 × 10−4 4.22 × 10−5 4.00 × 10−5 4.00 × 10−5 1.78 × 10−5 1.62 × 10−5 1.62 × 10−5 1.39 × 10−3 1.31 × 10−3 1.31 × 10−3 1.30 × 10−3 1.33 × 10−3 hagn/LX c 0 0.52 0.52 0 0.12 0.12 0 0.29 0.29 0 0.68 0.68 0.76 0.60 A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 a These boundary values are adopted from the best-fit models of ZN03, unless otherwise stated. bnout is the corresponding model electron number density at the outer boundary rout. chagn/LX is the ratio of the overall AGN heating rate to X-ray luminosity of the cluster. d Adopted from the Chandra observation (Ettori et al. 2002). e Adopted from the Chandra observation (Blanton et al. 2001). fTo provide a better fit to observations, we take the outer boundary of the cluster A2597 to be rout = 300 kpc and the AGN heating cutoff radius to be r0 = 40 kpc. g Adopted from the Chandra observation (McNamara et al. 2001). model. We first define the volume-integrated AGN heat- ing rate as hagn = Z rout rin 4πr2Hdr, (18) and the X-ray luminosity as LX = Z rout rin 4πr2ρLdr. (19) A cluster without any heating source will lose its ther- mal energy by emitting X-rays. We can thus define the isobaric cooling time from equation (3) as: tcool ≡ γ γ − 1 (cid:18) P ρL(cid:19) . (20) Table 1 lists the physical parameters and results of the steady-state models for four typical cool core clusters. Note that the mass accretion rates in our steady-state models are usually much less than the Eddington rate Med ≈ 26(Mbh/109M⊙)(η/0.1)−1 M⊙/yr, where Mbh is the mass of the supermassive black hole at the cluster center and η is the radiative efficiency of AGN accre- tion. We take the cluster Abell 1795 (Ettori et al. 2002) as our fiducial cluster. In the first two models (A1 and A2), the values of ǫ and M are given and f is obtained as the eigenvalue. Model A1 is a pure conduction model (ǫ = 0), while model A2 is a typical hybrid model with both thermal conduction and AGN feedback heating. In model A3, the AGN feedback efficiency ǫ is chosen to be much larger than that in model A2. We further as- sume that, in addition to the boundary conditions (17), the electron density at the outer boundary is fixed (we choose the same as that in model A2). Thus, with the extra boundary condition, both M and f can be solved as eigenvalues. The radial steady-state profiles of Abell 1795 are presented in Figure 1. As can clearly be seen, the electron density and temperature profiles of these three models fit the observational data quite well. The profiles of models A2 and A3 are virtually the same, since the gas density and temperature at both the inner and outer boundaries are exactly the same for these two mod- els. Using these cluster profiles and equation (20), we can then calculate the radial profiles of the isobaric cooling time, which are shown in the lower left panel of Figure 1. Obviously, tcool is much less than the age of the Uni- verse within ∼ 100 kpc from the cluster center, suggest- ing that the radiative cooling is dynamically important in the central regions of the cluster. We show the relative importance of AGN heating and thermal conduction in the lower right panel of Figure 1. For our hybrid models, while thermal conduction is significant in the outer parts of the cluster cool core, AGN heating clearly dominates at the center. Thus the gas temperature profile in the in- nermost regions (. 10 kpc) of the cluster is flatter than that in the pure conduction model, as clearly seen in the upper right panel of Figure 1. Since we will find later that the dependence of the clus- ter stability on ǫ varies somewhat with cluster proper- ties, particularly the density and temperature profiles, we choose the cluster Abell 2199 (Johnstone et al. 2002) as our second fiducial cluster and plot its radial steady- state profiles in Figure 2. The gas cooling time in its central cool core (r . 100 kpc) is clearly less than the Hubble time. for ZN03 found that, some cool core clusters, conduction-only models may require implausibly high values of thermal conductivity. We apply our model to one of these clusters, Abell 2597. As shown in Table 1, the conduction-only model (D1) for A2597 requires 6 Guo et al. Fig. 1. -- Electron number density (upper left), temperature (upper right), isobaric cooling time (lower left), and relative importance of AGN heating and conduction (lower right) in three typical steady-state models of the cluster Abell 1795. The dot-dashed line in the lower left panel shows the age of the universe (13.5 Gyr for the cosmology used in this paper). Crosses in the upper panels correspond to Chandra data (Ettori et al. 2002). See text and Table 1 for additional information. a thermal conductivity of f = 1.3. By including AGN feedback heating, the required thermal conductivity may be much smaller (e.g., f = 0.4 in model D3). Figure 3 shows radial profiles of electron temperature and num- ber density in our models for A2597 (model D1 - D5), which all fit the data reasonably well. We note that some cool core clusters may not be well explained by models with conduction and AGN "effervescent" heating (see Piffaretti & Kaastra 2006). However, they may be explained by models with a more realistic AGN heating function, and our method of global stability analysis is generally applicable to any steady-state AGN feedback models with only slight modifications due to the new AGN heating function. For each cluster, the first model in Table 1 is the pure conduction model, where the cooling is entirely balanced by thermal conduction. This model determines the max- imum value of f for each cluster: as the level of AGN heating increases, the required thermal conductivity de- creases. In the current paper, we only present our re- sults from some typical models with specific values of f (e.g., f = 0.12 in model A3 for the cluster A1795), but the conclusions drawn are general to models with different levels of thermal conduction (also see Table 3 of Piffaretti & Kaastra 2006). As an example, we addi- tionally present models with various values of f for the cluster A2597 (models D4 and D5) in Table 1 and Figure 3 (also see Figure 7). We note that a minimum level of thermal conduction is usually required in our steady-state models, since H/ρL is not uniform with radius, as readily seen in the lower right panels of Figure 1 and 2. In other words, the "ef- fervescent" AGN heating mechanism (equation 13) alone could not offset cooling at all radii throughout the clus- ter. Nonetheless, as we have shown, a combination of a moderate level (f & fmin, where fmin ∼ 0.1 for A1795 and ∼ 0.2 for A2597) of thermal conduction and the "ef- fervescent" AGN heating can balance cooling throughout the entire cluster, and the resulting steady-state profiles of electron density and temperature fit the observational data quite well. As f decreases, the heating from thermal conduction decreases, and thus the required AGN heat- ing increases. When f . fmin, the required AGN heating in steady-state models with the boundary conditions (17) usually overheats the cluster central regions, while the gas temperature and entropy start to drop rapidly with increasing radius, which is not consistent with X-ray ob- servations. Note that the requirement on conductivity (f & fmin) may be alleviated if other forms of AGN heating (e.g., viscous dissipation of sound waves, see Ruszkowski et al. 2004; shock heating, see Bruggen et al. 2007; cosmic ray feedback, see Guo & Oh 2008) are taken A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 7 Fig. 2. -- Electron number density (upper left), temperature (upper right), isobaric cooling time (lower left), and relative importance of AGN heating and conduction (lower right) in three typical steady-state models of the cluster Abell 2199. Crosses in the upper panels correspond to Chandra data (Johnstone et al. 2002). See text and Table 1 for additional information. into account, since a substantial fraction of sound waves, shocks or cosmic rays produced at the cluster center may be dissipated in the outer regions of the ICM, with per- haps different spatial heat deposition from what we have assumed. Further work on this is clearly needed. 3. RADIAL STABILITY ANALYSIS 3.1. Perturbation equations We linearize equations (1) − (4) by using the La- grangian perturbation method. The background ICM is assumed to be in steady state, as described in § 2.2. A Lagrangian perturbation, denoted by an operator ∆, is related to an Eulerian perturbation δ in the usual way, ∆ = δ + ξ · ∇, (21) Here we only consider radial perturbations and ∇ · ξ = 1 r2 ∂ ∂r (r2ξ), (24) where ξ = ∆r denotes the radial component of ξ. To derive the perturbation equations, we use the following properties of ∆ (Shapiro & Teukolsky 1983): ∆ d dt = d dt ∆, ∆ ∂ ∂r = ∂ ∂r ∆ − ∂ξ ∂r ∂ ∂r . (25) (26) where ξ is the displacement vector of a fluid element (see, e.g., Shapiro & Teukolsky 1983, pp. 130-147). By perturbing equations (1) and (7), we find Applying ∆ to equations (2) − (4) and using equations (3) and (22) - (26), we obtain ∆ρ = −ρ∇ · ξ, ∆P = P ∆T T − P ∇ · ξ. (22) (23) d2ξ dt2 = P ρ ∂ ∂r (∇ · ξ) − 1 ρ ∂ ∂r (cid:18)P ∆T T (cid:19) + 1 ρ dP dr ∂ξ ∂r − ξ d2Φ (27) dr2 , κT ∂ ∂r (cid:18) ∆T T (cid:19) = F (cid:18) 7 ∆T T − ∂ξ ∂r + 2ξ r (cid:19) + ∆Lr 4πr2 ,(28) 2 8 Guo et al. resulting heating of the ICM, which is justifiable since both the AGN duty cycle and the bubble rising time are usually much shorter than the gas cooling time (see the discussion above equation 13). Taking ξ, ∆T , ∆Lr as independent variables, we seek solutions of equations (27) − (29) that behave as ∼ eσt with time. The term ∆Hfeed in equation (30) then sim- plifies to ∆Hfeed = Hσ v0 ξ(rin), (32) and equations (27) − (29) may be rewritten as (cid:18) P ρ − v2(cid:19) d dr d2Φ (∇ · ξ) = (cid:18)rσ2 + r −2v2 d dr2 (cid:19) ξ r(cid:19) +(cid:18)2σv + v dr (cid:18) ξ r + dv dr 1 ρ d dr (cid:18)P ∆T T (cid:19) dr (cid:19) dξ , (33) dr dP − 1 ρ κT d dr (cid:18) ∆T T (cid:19) = F (cid:20) 7 2 ∆T T − r d dr (cid:18) ξ r(cid:19) + ξ r(cid:21) + ∆Lr 4πr2 ,(34) Fig. 3. -- Electron temperature (upper ) and number den- sity (lower ) in five typical steady-state models of the cluster Abell 2597. The data points are from the Chandra Observation (McNamara et al. 2001). See Table 1 for additional information. +(cid:18) P σ γ − 1 1 4πr2 d dr + ρT LT + v ∆Lr = (P σ − ρ2Lρ − H)(∇ · ξ) − ∆H dr(cid:19) ∆T dr (cid:18) ∆T γ − 1 d dr γ − 1 P v γ − 1 (∇ · ξ) + dP dr P ρ d +P v γv dρ − T T (cid:19) .(35) 1 4πr2 +(cid:18) P γ − 1 ∂ ∂r d dt ∆Lr = (cid:18)P d dt + ρT LT + − ρ2Lρ − H(cid:19) (∇ · ξ) − ∆H dt(cid:19) ∆T dP dt γ − 1 P ρ dρ − γ ,(29) T 1 γ − 1 where LT ≡ ∂L/∂T ρ, Lρ ≡ ∂L/∂ρT , Lr = −4πr2F is the radial heat luminosity, and ∆H is the perturbation of AGN heating rate (equation 13) ∆H =(cid:18)−2 + r r0 e−r/r0 1 − e−r/r0(cid:19) ξ H + H ∂P/∂r ∂ ∂r ∆P − H ∂ξ ∂r + H(cid:20)(β − 1) ∆P P − β P0 (cid:21) + ∆Hfeed, r ∆P0 where ∆P0 is the value of ∆P at the inner boundary rin, and ∆Hfeed ≡ H∆ M (rin)/ Min is the perturbation of the AGN heating rate due to the feedback mechanism, where ∆ M (rin) is the perturbation of the mass accretion rate at r = rin, ∆ M (rin) = Min v0 ∂ξ ∂t (rin), (31) which can be easily derived from perturbing the defini- tion of the mass accretion rate ( M ≡ 4πr2ρv) and using equations (22) and (24). Note that we have neglected any time delay between central AGN activity and the (30) 3.2. Local stability analysis of radial modes In equations (33) − (35) and hereinafter, we omit eσt from all perturbation variables. Equations (33) − (35) form an eigenvalue problem, which can be solved numerically with appropriate bound- ary conditions to find global eigenmodes and the eigen- value σ. Before considering the global modes, in the fol- lowing subsection, we first study small-scale local modes, which may not be captured in a global stability analysis (see the discussion in Balbus & Soker 1989). The na- ture of local thermal stability in a stratified system can be subtle, and linked to the convective instability of the system (Balbus 1988). For local stability analysis, we consider local WKB perturbations of the form ∼ eikrr+σt. Here we neglect the feedback mechanism of AGN heating, i.e. ∆Hfeed in equation (30) is taken to be zero. This term simply affects the overall normalization of heating without spa- tial dependence, and is only important in a global anal- ysis. The subsonic background flow is ignored as well, so that the unperturbed steady-state ICM is nearly in hydrostatic equilibrium. In the local approximation, we assume that krr ≫ 1 (plane-parallel approximation) and that the wavelengths of perturbations are much shorter than any spatial scale on which the background quan- tities vary (e.g., kr ≫ 1/λp, where λp ≡ (d ln P/dr)−1 is the gas pressure scale height in the ICM). To elimi- nate high-frequency sound waves from consideration, we also assume that σ ≪ cskr, where cs = pP/ρ is the A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 9 isothermal sound speed. Therefore, the perturbed dy- namical equation of motion (equation 33) simplifies to (KN03): ikrξ = ∆T T . (36) (note that in general, ∆T /T is complex). Similarly, the perturbed energy equation (35) may be rewritten as (P σ − ρ2Lρ − ρL)ikrξ +(cid:18) P σ = ∆(cid:18) 1 γ − 1 4πr2 + ρT LT(cid:19) ∆T T d dr Lr(cid:19) + ∆H. (37) Taking the leading order terms from the perturbations of thermal conduction and AGN heating, we obtain ∆(cid:18) 1 4πr2 d dr Lr(cid:19) = −κT k2 r ∆T T , (38) ∆H = H ∂P/∂r ∆ ∂P ∂r = −Hikrξ. (39) In the second equality of equation (39), the perturbation of the radial pressure gradient, ∆(∂P/∂r), is evaluated by perturbing the Euler equation (equation (2)) and as- suming that σ2 ≪ krc2 s/λp, which corresponds to slowly evolving perturbations4. Equations (36) − (39) may be combined to give σ = σ∞ − γ − 1 γ H P − γ − 1 γ κT P k2 r , where σ∞ = − γ − 1 γ ρT 2 P (cid:18) ∂L/T ∂T (cid:19)P (40) (41) is the growth rate of local isobaric thermal instability in the ICM without any heating (e.g., Field 1965; KN03). In the absence of any heating source, equation (40) re- duces to σ = σ∞, and we thus immediately recover the generalized Field criterion for isobaric thermal instability (Balbus 1986) (cid:18) ∂L/T ∂T (cid:19)P < 0. (42) For the ICM with L ∝ ρT 1/2, the instability criterion given by equation (42) is easily met, suggesting that local radial perturbations grow exponentially with the growth time t∞ ≡ σ−1 ∞ = 0.64 Gyr(cid:16) ne 0.05cm−3(cid:17)−1(cid:18) kBT 2keV(cid:19)1/2 . (43) Equation (40) confirms the well known result that thermal conduction stabilizes short-wavelength pertur- bations (e.g., Field 1965; Malagoli et al. 1987; KN03). More specifically, for the ICM with L ∝ ρT 1/2, thermal conduction alone stabilizes perturbations whose wave- lengths (λ ≡ 2π/kr) are smaller than the critical wave- length λField = 2π(cid:18) 2κT 3ρL(cid:19)1/2 = 25.6 kpc(cid:18) f 0.2(cid:19)1/2 (cid:16) ne 0.05cm−3(cid:17)−1(cid:18) kBT 2keV(cid:19)3/2 (44) . Equation (40) also clearly shows that an AGN heating term as implemented in our model (H ∝ ∂P/∂r) reduces the growth rate of local thermal instability, although it alone could not suppress local thermal instability com- pletely (note that (γ − 1)H/(γP σ∞) = 2H/3ρL ≤ 2/3, since H ≤ ρL). We note that local thermal instability of the ICM may depend on the actual mechanism by means of which the AGN mechanical energy is transferred to the thermal ICM; we have assumed complete local dissipa- tion of the pdV work done by the expanding bubbles. Alternative dissipation mechanisms (e.g., sounds waves which damp far away, or the heating effect of dispersed cosmic rays) could yield different results. Furthermore, in our 1D model we have assumed isotropic heating by bubbles; in reality the angular variation of bubble cre- ation will affect local (and global) thermal stability. The local stability analysis is not valid for long- wavelength perturbations, and a successful model for the ICM must be globally stable. KN03 studied the global stability of the pure conduction model, and found that it is globally unstable with the typical instability growth time of ∼ 2 − 5 Gyr; the growth time can be significantly shorter if one applies non-linear perturbations. In the next subsection, we will perform a global stability analy- sis for our steady-state cluster models presented in § 2.2, and show that the feedback mechanism is essential to stabilize global thermal instability in cool core clusters. 3.3. Global unstable modes To analyze global stability of the steady-state models of a given cluster, we numerically solve equations (33) − (35), which are equivalent to four first-order differential equations for the four variables ξ/r, ∆T /T , ∆Lr and ∇ · ξ = 3ξ/r + rd(ξ/r)/dr. We solve these equations as an eigenvalue problem, where the eigenvalue is the growth rate σ. Since we have four variables and one eigenvalue, we need to specify five boundary conditions. Here we choose the same boundary conditions as KN03. The three inner boundary conditions are 4 Provided that σ ≪ cskr, σ2 ≪ krc2 s/λp is guaranteed as long as σ < cs/λp (i.e., the growth time of the perturbation is longer than the sound crossing time over a pressure scale height). ξ r = 1, d dr (cid:18) ξ r(cid:19) = 0, ∆Lr = 0, at r = rin. (45) 10 Guo et al. Timescales for the clusters shown in Table 1 TABLE 2 Name A1795 a tcool,0 (Gyr) 0.9 b t∞,0 (Gyr) 0.6 d Model ǫmin 0.28 A2199 0.6 0.4 0.17 A2052 1.1 0.7 0.14 A2597 0.5 0.3 0.07 c tgrow (Gyr) 3.8 3.3, 43.3 e stable 2.8 4.4 16.9 6.2 5.9 20.0 2.0 3.3 38.1 27.5 20.3 A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 atcool,0 is the isobaric cooling time at the cluster center. bt∞,0 is the growth time of the local isobaric thermal insta- bility at the cluster center in absence of any heating source (see equation 43). ctgrow is the growth time of the unstable global radial mode. dǫmin is the lower limit of the AGN feedback efficiency, above which the ICM is effectively (tgrow > tH ) or completely stable. eThere are two unstable global radial modes in this model. Fig. 5. -- Eigenfunctions of the radial unstable modes for the steady-state models of Abell 2199 presented in Fig. 2, plotted as a function of radius. Each model has one unstable radial mode. The first condition is a normalization condition, while the second condition guarantees that the solutions are regu- lar (due to the presence of a (1/r)d/dr(ξ/r) term in the simplified form of equation 33). Since rin is not exactly zero, the second condition need not hold strictly. We have experimented with different values for the second condition (for instance, d/dr(ξ/r) = ξ/r2), and find that the results are not sensitive to it. This is consistent with the fact that the contribution of AGN feedback (equation 32) in the perturbed energy equation (35) is independent of this condition, although the exact value of the instabil- ity growth time for each model will be slightly affected due to its contribution to the perturbed cooling term (P σ∇ · ξ) in equation (35). The last condition demands that the perturbed radial heat luminosity is zero at the cluster center, which is equivalent to a zero tempera- ture gradient there. The remaining two outer boundary conditions are set by the requirement that perturbations vanish at the outer boundary, which has cooling times much longer than the cluster lifetime: ξ = 0, ∆T = 0, at r = rout. (46) We use the steady-state models constructed in § 2.2 as the background states to calculate the eigenmodes of global perturbations. Similar to KN03, we first fix σ and set ∆T /T to an arbitrary value at r = rin. We can then integrate eqautions (33) − (35) from r = rin to r = rout using a Runge-Kutta method. We use the bi- section method to update the inner value of ∆T /T and continue iterating until the first outer boundary condi- Fig. 4. -- Eigenfunctions of the radial unstable modes for the steady-state models of Abell 1795 presented in Fig. 1, plotted as a function of radius. The solid lines stand for the lone unstable mode for the pure conduction model (model A1 in Table 1). Model A2 has two unstable modes: tgrow = 3.3 Gyr (dotted lines) and tgrow = 43.3 Gyr (dashed lines). Model A3 has no unstable radial modes. A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 11 tion in equation (46) is satisfied. Finally, we scan σ in the range (104Gyr)−1 < σ < (10−4Gyr)−1, and use the second condition in equation (46) as a discriminant for solutions. We first study eigenmodes with a real positive σ, which correspond to globally unstable modes with an instability growth time tgrow = 1/σ. The results for the steady-state models listed in Table 1 are shown in Table 2, where, for comparison, we also list the central values of the isobaric cooling time (equation 20) and the growth time t∞ (equa- tion 43) of local isobaric thermal instability in absence of any heating source. For our fiducial cluster Abell 1795, the pure conduction model A1 (f = 0.27) has one un- stable mode with growth time tgrow = 3.8 Gyr, which is consistent with KN03, who found that the equilibrium model of A1795 (f = 0.2) has one unstable mode with tgrow = 4.1 Gyr. For model A2, where the AGN feed- back efficiency is ǫ = 0.1, we found two unstable modes with tgrow = 3.3 Gyr and 43.3 Gyr respectively. Model A3 has virtually the same background ICM profiles as model A2 (see § 2.2), but a higher AGN feedback effi- ciency (ǫ = 0.3). Our calculation shows that model A3 has no unstable modes. This is a remarkable result, since we, for the first time, show from a linear analysis that AGN feedback completely eliminates (radial) global ther- mal instability. We note that, without introducing the feedback mechanism for the AGN heating (i.e., if ∆Hfeed in equation 30 is taken to be zero), model A3 is still unstable and has two unstable modes with tgrow = 2.7 Gyr and 52.8 Gyr respectively. We repeated our calcula- tions for many different values of model parameters, and found that the models without the feedback mechanism are always globally unstable, even when the same models with the feedback mechanism included are globally sta- ble. Thus, the feedback mechanism of AGN heating is the key ingredient for stabilizing global thermal instabil- ity in cool core clusters. For the cluster Abell 2199, the pure conduction model (B1) is globally unstable with tgrow = 2.8 Gyr, which is consistent with KN03. With both conduction and AGN feedback heating included, models B2 and B3 are still globally unstable. However, the growth time of the un- stable mode in model B3 (ǫ = 0.2) is tgrow = 16.9Gyr > tH, which suggests that thermal instability is dynami- cally unimportant and thus is "effectively" suppressed. Note that, without introducing the feedback mechanism for the AGN heating, the growth time of the unstable mode in model B3 is much shorter (tgrow = 2.2Gyr). In Figure 4 and 5, we plot the eigenfunctions of the unstable modes in galaxy clusters A1795 and A2199, re- spectively. Clearly, the perturbations have largest am- plitude in the cluster central regions (r . 10 kpc) and decay rapidly with increasing radius, which suggests that perturbations reach nonlinear amplitudes much faster in central regions than in outer regions. Such global modes have also been found by KN03 for equilibrium ICM mod- els with thermal conduction only. As shown in Table 2, we obtain similar results for the other two cool core clusters listed in Table 1. It is worth mentioning that the pure conduction model for the clus- ter Abell 2597 requires an implausibly high value of the thermal conductivity (f = 1.3) and is globally unstable. By including AGN feedback heating, model D3 requires a smaller conductivity (f = 0.4) and is effectively stable Fig. 6. -- Effect of the AGN feedback efficiency on thermal stability in typical cool core clusters. For different models of each cluster, the values of f and ǫ M are roughly the same (equal to those in the second model listed in Table 1; see the text for details). Top M with ǫ. Bottom panel: the dependence of the panel: scaling of growth time of unstable modes on ǫ for each cluster. Note that the clusters are stable or effectively stable when ǫ is greater than a lower limit ǫmin. The line for A1795 is double-valued since it has two unstable modes; both these modes vanish when ǫ > 0.28. Here, we assume ǫ is a constant; if, as suggested by observations, ǫ ∝ M ν (with ν ∼ 0.3 − 0.6), then ǫmin will be smaller (see text). (tgrow = 38.1Gyr, for ǫ = 0.1). 3.4. Dependence on the AGN feedback efficiency From the results of the previous subsection, one might conjecture that the ICM is stable (or effectively stable) if the AGN feedback efficiency ǫ is greater than a lower limit. To fully explore the dependence of the cluster stability on the AGN feedback efficiency, we consider the steady-state cluster models subject to the following boundary conditions ne(rin) = n0, T (rin) = Tin, r2 inF (rin) = 0, T (rout) = Tout, ne(rout) = nout, (47) where the value of nout for each cluster is chosen to be that of the second model for that cluster, as listed in Ta- ble 1. As described in § 2.2, such boundary conditions 12 Guo et al. The lower panel of Figure 6 clearly shows that the clus- ter is stable or effectively stable (tgrow > tH ) when ǫ is greater than a lower limit ǫmin. We note that this result generalizes as well to models with different values of f , as seen in Figure 7, which shows the effect of AGN feedback efficiency on global stability for models of A2597 with f = 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5. Assuming that the real intracluster gas is in a stable quasi-steady state, our global stability analysis thus suggests a constraint on the kinetic effi- ciency of AGN feedback. As listed in Table 2, the values of ǫmin for these four typical cool core clusters are ǫmin ∼ 0.07 − 0.28, which is roughly consistent with the recent estimate of ǫ ∼ 0.3 for radio-loud AGNs by Heinz et al. (2007) and is marginally consistent with observational estimates of ǫ ∼ 0.01 − 0.1 by Allen et al. (2006) and Merloni & Heinz (2007). In our AGN feedback model, we assume that ǫ is a constant. However, recent X-ray observations seem to suggest that ǫ ∝ M ν, where ν ∼ 0.3 (Allen et al. 2006) or 0.6 (Merloni & Heinz 2007). In this case, the AGN feedback will be even stronger (i.e., in equation 30, ∆Hfeed = H∆ M (rin)/ Min + H∆ǫ/ǫ), and M appropriate for thus the value of ǫmin (evaluated at the steady-state case) will be reduced. For the cluster A1795, ǫmin is reduced from 0.28 to 0.22 (ν = 0.3) or 0.18 (ν = 0.6). For the cluster A2199, ǫmin is reduced from 0.17 to 0.13 (ν = 0.3) or 0.10 (ν = 0.6). The ac- tual value of ǫmin is also sensitive to the exact form of the AGN heating law adopted, particularly its spatial de- pendence. Here we have only considered the pdV work due by rising bubbles, and ignored, for instance, cos- mic ray heating (Guo & Oh 2008), viscous dissipation of sound waves (Ruszkowski et al. 2004) or shock heating (Bruggen et al. 2007). However, while we do not place great store in the absolute value we obtain for ǫmin, the fact that there is a minimal heating efficiency ǫmin for a given temperature profile should be fairly robust, since it only requires that Lagn ∝ ǫ M . 3.5. Dependence on the background profiles In this subsection, we will study the dependence of the cluster stability on the background steady-state ICM profiles. We adopt the clusters Abell 1795 and Abell 2199 as our fiducial clusters. Since the gas cooling time at the outer boundary is much longer than the Hubble time, we consider steady-state cluster models with fixed val- ues of Tout and nout, which are chosen to be the same as those in the second model listed in Table 1 for each clus- ter. Of the three inner boundary conditions in equation (17), we choose two (including r2 inF (rin) = 0 and a given value of Tin for a specific model). We have four bound- ary conditions for three first-order ordinary differential M can be solved equations (§ 2.2). Thus, the value of as the eigenvalue for a specific steady-state model with a given value of f and ǫ (which are deemed to be fixed by the physics of thermal conduction and black hole ac- cretion respectively). The corresponding central electron number density for each steady-state model (represented by the varying value of Tin) is shown in the upper panels of Figure 8 and 10. In addition, it is possible to vary the inner boundary rin. Varying rin at fixed Tin is basically denegerate with varying Tin at fixed rin, and thus we do not explore this additional dependence. We first consider the models of the cluster A1795 with Fig. 7. -- Effect of the AGN feedback efficiency on thermal stability in A2597. Each curve is plotted as a function of ǫ with a fixed conductivity suppression factor f . Top panel: scaling of M with ǫ. Bottom panel: the dependence of the growth time of unstable modes on ǫ. For different levels of fixed conductivity, the cluster always becomes more stable as the AGN feedback efficiency increases. ensure that the steady-state ICM profiles are almost ex- actly the same for models with different values of ǫ (see the lines for models A2 and A3 in Figure 1); it is only meaningful to study the dependence of the cluster sta- bility on ǫ when the background profiles are virtually the same. Since the steady state cluster model only has three variables P (r), T (r), r2F (r) (§ 2.2), the five bound- ary conditions (47) can determine two eigenvalues. Al- though our hybrid cluster models formally have three pa- rameters (f , ǫ and M ), they are essentially determined by two parameters: f , which determines the level of ther- mal conduction, and ǫ M , which determines the level of AGN heating, while the subsonic inflow itself ( M ) only has a negligible effect. Thus, for each cluster, the values of f and ǫ M are roughly fixed by the boundary condi- tions (47), and M varies with the free parameter ǫ (see Figure 6). For each steady-state cluster model, we then repeat our stability calculations and search for unstable modes. The results are shown in Figure 6, where the steady- state mass accretion rate and the growth time of unstable modes are plotted as a function of the AGN feedback ef- ficiency. The value of f for each cluster roughly equals to that in the second model of that cluster listed in Table 1. A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 13 Fig. 8. -- Dependence of the cluster stability on the background profile for the cluster A1795. For a fixed value of f and ǫ, the cor- responding central electron number density (upper panel ), steady- state mass accretion rate (middle panel ), and the growth time of unstable modes (lower panel ) are plotted as a function of the cen- tral gas temperature Tin. The dot short-dashed line in the lower panel shows the growth time of the unstable mode in steady-state models with f = 0.12, ǫ = 0.1 and no feedback mechanism for AGN heating (i.e., ∆Hfeed in equation 30 is taken to be zero), while the dot long-dashed line stands for the central gas cooling time in models with f = 0.12, ǫ = 0.1. f = 0.12 and ǫ = 0.1 (i.e., variations of model A2). The dependence of the cluster stability on the background profile (represented by Tin) is plotted in Figure 8 (solid line), which clearly shows that the model with either a relatively flat (Tin > 4.5 keV) or steep (Tin < 1.7 keV) temperature profile is (effectively) stable, while ther- mal instability can develop at intermediate temperatures. Figure 9 shows radial profiles of electron number density, temperature and the eigenfunction (ξ/r) of the radial un- stable mode for three typical steady state models with Tin = 6 keV, 3 keV, and 1 keV respectively. 3.5.1. Cool core versus non-cool core clusters X-ray observations also suggest that clusters can be subdivided into two distinct categories according to the presence or absence of a cool core (e.g., Peres et al. 1998, Bauer et al. 2005, Sanderson et al. 2006, Chen et al. 2007). In this section we discuss how our model may account for this effect. The dot-dashed line in the lower panel of Figure 8 shows the growth time of the unstable mode in steady- state models with f = 0.12, ǫ = 0.1 and no feedback Fig. 9. -- Radial profiles of electron number density (upper panel ), temperature (middle panel ) and the eigenfunction of the radial unstable mode (lower panel ) in three typical steady-state models of the cluster Abell 1795 with f = 0.12 and ǫ = 0.1. mechanism for AGN heating (i.e., ∆Hfeed in equation 30 is taken to be zero). Without the feedback mechanism, the instability growth time in cool core clusters with rela- tively steep temperature profiles is very short (∼ 2 Gyr), suggesting that the feedback mechanism plays a key role in stabilizing thermal instability in these clusters. As the central gas temperature increases and the central gas density decreases, the stabilizing effect of the feed- back mechanism becomes smaller, which is reasonable since the perturbation of the central mass accretion rate (note that Lagn ∝ Min) scales as the central gas density (equation 31) and the importance of the feedback mech- anism in the energy perturbation equation (35) may be expressed as ∆Hfeed/(P σ∇ · ξ), which (using equations (13, 14, 32) and dP/dr ∼ ρg) scales as T −2 at any spe- cific radius. Colder, denser (i.e. low entropy) gas has a steeper pressure gradient in a fixed potential well, which increases the volumetric rate at which cavities perform pdV work as they rise. On the other hand, although the stabilizing effect of the feedback mechanism becomes negligible for non-cool core clusters with relatively flat temperature profiles, our stability analysis surprisingly shows that these cluster models are also (effectively) stable. As shown in §3.2, the diffusive AGN heating (H ∝ ∂P/∂r) only increases 14 Guo et al. Fig. 11. -- The growth time of unstable modes for models of the cluster A2597 with f = 0.4 and ǫ = 0.05, plotted as a function of the central gas temperature. Both the stable CC and NCC branches are seen in the calculations with either our simplified cooling function or a full cooling function (see text). duction f < 1, or else the CC cluster is globally unstable on fairly short timescales. We did the same calculations for the cluster A2052 and A2597, and found similar re- sults. We stress that, except for models with very high val- ues of f and ǫ (which may always be stable, as seen from the trend of different lines shown in Figure 8 and 10), the clusters are usually stable either when the cen- tral temperature is high (non-CC) or when the central temperature is sufficiently low. Figure 8 (and the anal- ogous Figure 10 for A2199) suggest that the interme- diate values correspond to globally unstable solutions. This is consistent with 1D hydrodynamic simulations of RB02 and Guo & Oh (2008): if conductivity is large, the cluster relaxes to stable NCC states (see Figure 1 and 2 of Guo & Oh 2008); if f is small (i.e., conduction couldn't offset the cooling), the cluster first cools grad- ually through NCC states, and then quickly relaxes to stable CC states (see Fig. 1 in RB02 or Fig. 4 and 5 of Guo & Oh 2008). We note that the radiative cooling times in non-CC clusters are generaly longer than in the CC ones and in some of the non-CC clusters no heating is required to prevent thermal instability on a timescale shorter than the Hubble time (note however that in the cases shown in Figures 8 and 10 (dot long-dashed lines), the central cooling timescale is always shorter then the instability growth time). Irrespectively of whether this is the case or not, our model naturally explains the di- chotomy between CC clusters where AGN feedback sig- natures are observed (and where the AGN play the key role in establishing global stability) and the non-CC clus- ters, where conduction may play a role but where the AGN feedback is not readily observed. This trend for the non-CC (flat temperature) clusters to have no AGN as opposed to CC clusters with clear AGN observational signatures is clearly seen in the recent data compiled by Dunn & Fabian (2008). This is also consistent with the observation by Rafferty et al. (2008) who show that the short central cooling time corresponds to younger AGN (i.e., shorter X-ray cavity ages). Metal line cooling may become important when the gas temperature is low. We checked our calculations with a full cooling function (equation 35 of Guo & Oh 2008, which is based on Sutherland & Dopita 1993), and did not find qualitative changes to our results. As an example, Figure 11 shows the dependence of the cluster stability on the central gas temperature for the cluster Fig. 10. -- Dependence of the cluster stability on the back- ground profile for the cluster A2199. For a fixed value of f and ǫ, the corresponding central electron number density (upper panel ), steady-state mass accretion rate (middle panel ), and the growth time of unstable modes (lower panel ) are plotted as a function of the central gas temperature Tin. The dotted line in the lower panel stands for the Hubble time, while the dot short-dashed line shows the growth time of the unstable mode in steady-state models with f = 0.36, ǫ = 0.2 and no feedback mechanism for AGN heating, while the dot long-dashed line stands for the central gas cooling time in models with f = 0.36, ǫ = 0.2. the growth time of local thermal instability, while ther- mal conduction may completely suppress local perturba- tions with wavelength less than λField, which increases as the central gas temperature increases and which may then be greater than the cooling radius. Thus, we ex- pect that thermal conduction alone may completely sup- press thermal instability in these non-CC clusters. This is confirmed by our stability analysis: we constructed NCC models with only conduction and found them to be stable. The short and long dashed lines in Figure 8 show the models with a higher thermal conductivity and AGN feedback efficiency respectively. Obviously, a higher level of thermal conduction increases the stability of the clus- ter. However, a higher level of AGN feedback efficiency only increases the stability of CC cluster models, but has a negligible stabilizing effect on non-CC cluster mod- els. Thus, AGN feedback heating is not required in NCC clusters. On the other hand, for CC clusters with lower central temperatures, AGN heating is generally required: otherwise one is either unable to build an equilibrium profile with a physically plausible level of thermal con- A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 15 A2597, which has the lowest Tin in our cluster sample. With both free-free and metal line cooling included, the gas cooling rate increases and the dependence of tgrow on Tin becomes similar to that of the higher-temperature cluster A1795 (see Fig. 8), but both the stable CC and NCC branches still exist. Through hydrodynamic numerical simulations, RB02 shows that the ICM heated by a combination of AGN feedback and thermal conduction usually relaxes to a sta- ble quasi-steady state. Surprisingly, our stability analysis shows that a specific steady-state model may be globally unstable if the AGN feedback efficiency is lower than a critical value. This "inconsistency" may be explained if the cluster with lower ǫ relaxes to a steady state with lower central gas temperatures, which may then be effec- tively stable, as clearly shown in this subsection. Recent numerical simulations by Guo & Oh (2008) indeed con- firms that the cluster central regions in their cosmic-ray feedback models with lower ǫ cool to higher densities and lower temperatures in the final steady state (see Figure 7 of Guo & Oh (2008)). 3.6. Global decaying modes We have also searched for global decaying modes with real and negative σ. For each steady-state model of the ICM, similar to KN03 (see Figure 4b of KN03), we found a series of decaying modes, within which there exists a slowest decaying mode with the smallest decay rate. Fig- ure 12 shows the eigenfunction (ξ/r) of the slowest decay- ing mode in typical steady-state models for the cluster Abell 1795 and Abell 2199. The decay rate of the most slowly decaying mode could potentially serve as an indi- cator of the "attractor" solution toward which a cluster evolves after it has been reset by a merger, and might be worthy of further study. It may also be interesting to explicitly study the effect of AGN feedback on global non-radial modes and overstable modes, which we leave to future work (see Malagoli et al. 1987, Balbus & Soker 1989 and KN03 for local analyses of these modes in the ICM with thermal conduction). 4. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION Recent Chandra and XMM-Newton X-ray observations suggest that the hot intracluster gas is maintained by one or more heating sources at keV temperatures for a pe- riod at least comparable to the lifetime of galaxy clusters (§ 1). Since the emission lines expected from cooler gas are notoriously absent (e.g., Peterson & Fabian (2006)), the heating source (or sources) should also effectively suppress the thermal instability of the ICM. Although thermal conduction stabilizes thermal instability for per- turbations with short wavelengths, the equilibrium ICM heated by thermal conduction alone is globally unstable and will evolve to a cooling catastrophe under global per- turbations. On the other hand, using numerical hydro- dynamic simulations, RB02 and Guo & Oh (2008) show that the ICM, which is initially in a state far from equi- librium and is heated by a combination of thermal con- duction and AGN feedback, usually relaxes to a quasi- equilibrium steady state. Although these simulations adopt simplified 1D models for the elusive spatial distri- bution of AGN heating, they strongly suggest that the AGN feedback mechanism plays a key role in suppressing global thermal instability. Fig. 12. -- Eigenfunctions of the slowest decaying modes (σ < 0) in typical steady-state models for the cluster: (a) Abell 1795 and (b) Abell 2199. For each steady-state model, there exist decaying modes with larger decay rates, which are not shown in this figure. In this paper, we perform a detailed formal analysis of thermal instability in the ICM with both AGN feedback heating and thermal conduction. To build initial un- perturbed states for stability analysis, we first construct steady-state cluster models, where the gas density and temperature profiles fit observations quite well and where the mass accretion rates are highly suppressed compared to those predicted by the standard cooling flow mod- els (§ 2.2). Using the Lagrangian perturbation method, we then derive a set of differential equations that form an eigenvalue problem for global radial modes with the mode growth rate σ as the eigenvalue. For pure con- duction models of typical cool-core clusters, we find that the ICM has one unstable radial mode with the typical growth time ∼ 2 − 6 Gyr (Table 2), which is consistent with the results of Kim & Narayan (2003). However, for the hybrid models with both AGN heating and thermal conduction, global thermal instability is effectively re- duced or even completely suppressed if the feedback effi- ciency ǫ is greater than a lower limit ǫmin. Interestingly, if the AGN heating (equation 13) is independent of the 16 Guo et al. central mass accretion rate (i.e., no feedback mechanism for AGN heating), the ICM is still unstable (§ 3.3), which suggests that the feedback mechanism is essential to sup- press thermal instability. Assuming that the real intracluster gas is in a sta- ble quasi-steady state, our global stability analysis thus suggests a minimum value ǫmin of the kinetic efficiency of AGN feedback, if it is to suppress a cooling flow. The value of ǫmin required in typical cool-core clusters is around ∼ 0.07 − 0.28 (see Table 2), which is roughly con- sistent with the estimate of the jet production efficiency (∼ 30%) for radio-loud AGNs by Heinz et al. (2007) and which is marginally consistent with recent observational estimations of ǫ ∼ 0.01 − 0.1 by Allen et al. (2006) and Merloni & Heinz (2007). Note that the value of ǫmin will be reduced if ǫ is an increasing function of the central mass accretion rate as suggested by recent observations (§ 3.4). Although the existence of ǫmin should be fairly robust, its exact value will also depend on the assumed form of AGN heating law. A related important issue in AGN feedback models is how and what fraction of the cooling gas at a distance of order 1 kpc gets to the cluster center and finally fuels the AGN. This could be a very complex process due to the large range of distance scales involved. Our calculation extended from ∼ 1Mpc in the cluster outer regions to ∼ 1kpc at our innermost integration point. However, the black hole gravitational radius of influence rBH is much further in: GMBH σ2 = 0.05 kpc(cid:18) MBH 109 M⊙(cid:19)(cid:16) σ 300 km s−1(cid:17)−2 rBH = (48) It is conceivable that if the flow is steady all the way down to the black hole, it transitions from a cool- ing flow to an adiabatic Bondi flow (see, for instance, Quataert & Narayan 2000 and the discussion in § 5 of Chandran & Rasera 2007), and there is tentative ob- servational evidence that the Bondi formula may pro- vide a reasonable approximation of the accretion process in X-ray luminous galaxies (Allen et al. 2006). How- ever, there are a host of potential complications: an- gular momentum, which would cause a torus or accre- tion disk to form instead, magnetic pressure and outflows (Proga & Begelman 2003), and local thermal instability resulting in the formation of stars and cold gas blobs (Pizzolato & Soker 2005), resulting in "cold accretion" or the possibility that the black hole is fed by stellar winds. In this paper, in line with most numerical simulations in the literature (e.g., Ruszkowski & Begelman 2002; Brighenti & Mathews 2003; Hoeft & Bruggen 2004; Vernaleo & Reynolds 2006) we have assumed that essen- tially all of the inflowing gas in our innermost bound- ary point eventually makes it to the black hole, over timescales long compared to the AGN duty cycle, but shorter than or comparable to the gas inflow timescale, tflow ∼ 109yr. This behaviour is likely to be intermit- tent rather than steady: gas accumulates in an accretion disk/torus around the black hole, which eventually trig- gers an outburst and leads to gas consumption, etc. We assume that in steady state, the black hole will even- tually consume all the gas which is supplied to it. In particular, in our model, while the black hole can exert thermal feedback on the cooling gas (through its heat- ing activity), it exerts negligible hydrodynamic feedback (by consuming gas faster or more slowly than the supply rate, thus affecting pressure forces throughout the cool- ing flow region). If indeed such a scenario applies, the results of our present paper should be recalculated in de- tail, since in that case M cannot be freely varied, but is further constrained by the accretion law. Given the large uncertainties and difficulty of this calculation, we leave this to future work. In § 3.5, we study the dependence of the cluster stabil- ity on the background steady-state profiles and find that the unstable cluster models with ǫ < ǫmin may become effectively stable if the central gas temperature drops to much lower values. Numerical simulations by Guo & Oh (2008) indeed confirm that the cluster central regions in their cosmic-ray feedback models with lower ǫ usually cool to higher densities and lower temperatures in the fi- nal steady state. Thus, unlike the pure conduction mod- els, where nonlinear evolution of global unstable modes lead to the cooling catastrophe, the ICM in our hybrid cluster models with AGN feedback included may always evolve to a quasi-steady state, which is effectively stable. On the other hand, we also show that thermal conduction will completely suppress thermal instability in non-CC clusters with relatively flat temperature profiles. Thus, the stability of the ICM favors two distinct categories of cluster steady state profiles: CC clusters stabilized mainly by AGN feedback and non-CC clusters stabilized by thermal conduction. Interestingly, recent X-ray ob- servations also suggest that clusters can be subdivided into two distinct categories according to the presence or absence of a cool core (e.g., Peres et al. 1998, Bauer et al. 2005, Sanderson et al. 2006, Chen et al. 2007). It is perhaps even possible that these two categories of clusters represent different stages of the same object. The importance of thermal conduction on global scales obviously depends on the large scale structure of the cluster magnetic fields. Recent calculations suggest that thermal conduction of heat into the cluster core can be self-limiting: in cases where the temperature decreases in the direction of gravity, a buoyancy stability sets in which re-orients a radial magnetic field to be largely transverse, shutting off conduction to the cluster cen- ter (Quataert 2008). Non-linear simulations indicate the heat flux could be reduce to ∼ 1% of the Spitzer value (Parrish & Quataert 2008). Thus, the following scenario could arise: as conductivity falls, gas cooling and mass inflow will increase, triggering AGN activity. The rising buoyant bubbles or the gas convective overturn mediated by cosmic rays (Chandran 2004) may re-orient the mag- netic field to be largely radial again, increasing thermal conduction and reducing mass inflow, shutting off the AGN until the heat flux driven buoyancy instability sets in once again. The cluster could therefore continuously cycle between cool-core (AGN heating dominated) and non cool-core (conduction dominated) states. Global linear stability analysis can clearly serve as a useful complement to simulations, both for the physi- cal insight they can deliver and speed in exploring pa- rameter space. Formally, a globally stable equilibrium state is a necessary but insufficient condition for a suc- cessful cluster model. A linear analysis fails for large non-linear perturbations (as a cluster would undergo, for A Global Stability Analysis of Galaxy Clusters 17 instance, during mergers). Nonetheless, the linear sta- bility analysis qualitatively reproduces the same features we have observed in 1D hydrodynamic simulations when we start the simulation from arbitrary initial conditions: conduction-only models suffer drastic cooling flows, while conduction + AGN heating models relax to a stable state with low mass inflow rates. For a given value of ǫ and f , a wide range of stable profiles are accessible. From a suite of linear stability analyses alone, it is not possible to predict the detailed final temperature and density profile the cluster relaxes to (which is somewhat sensitive to ini- tial conditions), but it is possible to make general state- ments about stability and whether the cluster will relax to a cool core or non cool-core configuration. Finally, we have restricted our attention to a 1D radial analy- sis. While a 2D or 3D analysis would be more general, it would be much more complicated and unlikely to prove enlightening, at least for global modes. Non-radial modes may prove important in the case of local thermal insta- bility, but the fastest growing unstable global mode -- the possible cooling flow we wish to stem -- is likely to respect spherical symmetry, unless the heating sources (such as the AGN jets) are severely anisotropic. Such models are beyond the scope of the present paper. We thank Omer Blaes, Ian Parrish, Mitch Begelman, Marcus Bruggen, Paul Nulsen, Biman Nath for discus- sions. We also thank Mark Voit and Noam Soker for comments on the manuscript, and the anonymous referee for a very detailed and helpful report. FG and SPO ac- knowledge support by NASA grant NNG06GH95G. MR acknowledges support by Chandra theory grant TM8- 9011X. REFERENCES Allen S. W., Dunn R. J. H., Fabian A. C., Taylor G. B., Reynolds C. S., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 21 Balbus S. A., 1986, ApJ, 303, L79 Balbus S. A., Soker N., 1989, ApJ, 341, 611 Bauer, F. E., Fabian, A. C., Sanders, J. S., Allen, S. W., & Johnstone, R. M. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1481 Begelman M. C., 2001, in Hibbard J. E., Rupen M., van Gorkom J. H., eds, ASP Conf. Ser. 240, Gas and Galaxy Evolution (San Francisco: ASP), 363 Bertschinger E., Meiksin A., 1986, ApJ, 306, L1 Bırzan L., Rafferty D. A., McNamara B. R., Wise M. W., Nulsen P. E. J., 2004, ApJ, 607, 800 Blanton E. L., Sarazin C. L., McNamara B. R., Wise M. W., 2001, ApJ, 558, L15 Bregman, J. N., & David, L. P. 1988, ApJ, 326, 639 Brighenti F., Mathews W. G., 2003, ApJ, 587, 580 Bruggen M., Heinz S., Roediger E., Ruszkowski M., Simionescu A., 2007, MNRAS, 380, L67 Bruggen M., Kaiser C. R., 2002, Nature, 418, 301 Burns J. O., 1990, AJ, 99, 14 Burns, J. O., Hallman, E. J., Gantner, B., Motl, P. M., & Norman, M. L. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1125 Chandran, B. D. G. 2004, ApJ, 616, 169 Chandran, B. D. G., & Rasera, Y. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1413 Chen, Y., Reiprich, T. H., Bohringer, H., Ikebe, Y., & Zhang, Y.-Y. 2007, A&A, 466, 805 Cho J., Lazarian A., Honein A., Knaepen B., Kassinos S., Moin P., 2003, ApJ, 589, L77 Churazov E., Sunyaev R., Forman W., Bohringer H., 2002, MNRAS, 332, 729 Ciotti L., Ostriker J. P., 2001, ApJ, 551, 131 Dunn, R. J. H., & Fabian, A. C. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 757 Ettori S., Fabian A. C., Allen S. W., Johnstone R. M., 2002, MNRAS, 331, 635 Fabian A. C., 1994, ARA&A, 32, 277 Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., Ettori S., Taylor G. B., Allen S. W., Crawford C. S., Iwasawa K., Johnstone R. M., Ogle P. M., 2000, MNRAS, 318, L65 Field G. B., 1965, ApJ, 142, 531 Forman W., Jones C., Churazov E., Markevitch M., Nulsen P., Vikhlinin A., Begelman M., Bohringer H., Eilek J., Heinz S., Kraft R., Owen F., Pahre M., 2007, ApJ, 665, 1057 Guo F., Oh S. P., 2008, MNRAS, 384, 251 Heinz S., Merloni A., Schwab J., 2007, ApJ, 658, L9 Hoeft, M., & Bruggen, M. 2004, ApJ, 617, 896 Johnstone R. M., Allen S. W., Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., 2002, MNRAS, 336, 299 Kaiser C. R., Binney J., 2003, MNRAS, 338, 837 Kim W.-T., Narayan R., 2003, ApJ, 596, 889 Lazarian A., 2006, ApJ, 645, L25 McCarthy, I. G., Babul, A., Bower, R. G., & Balogh, M. L. 2008, MNRAS, 403 Malagoli A., Rosner R., Bodo G., 1987, ApJ, 319, 632 McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., 2007, ARA&A, 45, 117 McNamara B. R., Wise M. W., Nulsen P. E. J., David L. P., Carilli C. L., Sarazin C. L., O'Dea C. P., Houck J., Donahue M., Baum S., Voit M., O'Connell R. W., Koekemoer A., 2001, ApJ, 562, L149 Merloni A., Heinz S., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 589 Narayan R., Medvedev M. V., 2001, ApJ, 562, L129 Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 Parrish I. J., Quataert E., 2008, ApJ, 677, L9 Peres, C. B., Fabian, A. C., Edge, A. C., Allen, S. W., Johnstone, R. M., & White, D. A. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 416 Peterson J. R., Fabian A. C., 2006, Phys. Rep., 427, 1 Peterson J. R., Kahn S. M., Paerels F. B. S., Kaastra J. S., Tamura T., Bleeker J. A. M., Ferrigno C., Jernigan J. G., 2003, ApJ, 590, 207 Peterson J. R., Paerels F. B. S., Kaastra J. S., Arnaud M., Reiprich T. H., Fabian A. C., Mushotzky R. F., Jernigan J. G., Sakelliou I., 2001, A&A, 365, L104 Piffaretti, R., & Kaastra, J. S. 2006, A&A, 453, 423 Pizzolato, F., & Soker, N. 2005, ApJ, 632, 821 Proga, D., & Begelman, M. C. 2003, ApJ, 592, 767 Quataert, E., & Narayan, R. 2000, ApJ, 528, 236 Quataert E., 2008, ApJ, 673, 758 Rafferty, D., McNamara, B., & Nulsen, P. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 802, arXiv:0802.1864 Reynolds C. S., Begelman M. C., 1997, ApJ, 487, L135 Rosner, R., & Tucker, W. H. 1989, ApJ, 338, 761 Roychowdhury S., Ruszkowski M., Nath B. B., 2005, ApJ, 634, 90 Ruszkowski M., Begelman M. C., 2002, ApJ, 581, 223 Ruszkowski M., Bruggen M., Begelman M. C., 2004, ApJ, 611, 158 Rybicki G. B., Lightman A. P., 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics. New York: Wiley Sanderson A. J. R., Ponman T. J., O'Sullivan E., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1496 Shapiro S. L., Teukolsky S. A., 1983, Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars. New York, Wiley-Interscience Sijacki, D., Pfrommer, C., Springel, V., & Ensslin, T. A. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 801, arXiv:0801.3285 Soker, N. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 463 Spitzer L., 1962, Physics of Fully Ionized Gases. New York: Interscience Sutherland R. S., Dopita M. A., 1993, ApJS, 88, 253 Tamura T., Kaastra J. S., Peterson J. R., Paerels F. B. S., Mittaz J. P. D., Trudolyubov S. P., Stewart G., Fabian A. C., Mushotzky R. F., Lumb D. H., Ikebe Y., 2001, A&A, 365, L87 Vernaleo, J. C., & Reynolds, C. S. 2006, ApJ, 645, 83 Voigt L. M., Fabian A. C., 2004, MNRAS, 347, 1130 Voit G. M., Donahue M., 2005, ApJ, 634, 955 Zakamska N. L., Narayan R., 2003, ApJ, 582, 162
0710.0796	1	0710	2007-10-03T14:21:52	Keck spectroscopy of the faint dwarf elliptical galaxy population in the Perseus Cluster core: mixed stellar populations and a flat luminosity function	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present the result of a photometric and Keck-LRIS spectroscopic study of dwarf galaxies in the core of the Perseus Cluster, down to a magnitude of M_B = -12.5. Spectra were obtained for twenty-three dwarf-galaxy candidates, from which we measure radial velocities and stellar population characteristics from absorption line indices. From radial velocities obtained using these spectra we confirm twelve systems as cluster members, with the remaining eleven as non-members. Using these newly confirmed cluster members, we are able to extend the confirmed colour-magnitude relation for the Perseus Cluster down to M_B = -12.5. We confirm an increase in the scatter about the colour magnitude relationship below M_B = -15.5, but reject the hypothesis that very red dwarfs are cluster members. We measure the faint-end slope of the luminosity function between M_B = -18 and M_B = -12.5, finding alpha = -1.26 \pm 0.06, which is similar to that of the field. This implies that an overabundance of dwarf galaxies does not exist in the core of the Perseus Cluster. By comparing metal and Balmer absorption line indices with alpha-enhanced single stellar population models, we derive ages and metallicities for these newly confirmed cluster members. We find two distinct dwarf elliptical populations: an old, metal poor population with ages ~ 8 Gyr and metallicities [Fe/H] < -0.33, and a young, metal rich population with ages < 5 Gyr and metallicities [Fe/H] > -0.33. Dwarf galaxies in the Perseus Cluster are therefore not a simple homogeneous population, but rather exhibit a range in age and metallicity.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 -- 000 (0000) Printed 6 June 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Keck spectroscopy of the faint dwarf elliptical galaxy population in the Perseus Cluster core: mixed stellar populations and a flat luminosity function Samantha J. Penny1 and Christopher J. Conselice1 1School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom 6 June 2018 ABSTRACT We present the result of a photometric and Keck-LRIS spectroscopic study of dwarf galaxies in the core of the Perseus Cluster, down to a magnitude of MB = −12.5. Spectra were ob- tained for twenty-three dwarf-galaxy candidates, from which we measure radial velocities and stellar population characteristics from absorption line indices. From radial velocities obtained using these spectra we confirm twelve systems as cluster members, with the remaining eleven as non-members. Using these newly confirmed cluster members, we are able to extend the confirmed colour-magnitude relation for the Perseus Cluster down to MB = −12.5. We con- firm an increase in the scatter about the colour magnitude relationship below MB = −15.5, but reject the hypothesis that very red dwarfs are cluster members. We measure the faint-end slope of the luminosity function between MB = −18 and MB = −12.5, finding α = −1.26 ± 0.06, which is similar to that of the field. This implies that an overabundance of dwarf galaxies does not exist in the core of the Perseus Cluster. By comparing metal and Balmer absorption line indices with α-enhanced single stellar population models, we derive ages and metallicities for these newly confirmed cluster members. We find two distinct dwarf elliptical populations: an old, metal poor population with ages ∼ 8 Gyr and metallicities [Fe/H] < −0.33, and a young, metal rich population with ages < 5 Gyr and metallicities [Fe/H] > −0.33. Dwarf galaxies in the Perseus Cluster are therefore not a simple homogeneous population, but rather exhibit a range in age and metallicity. Key words: galaxies: dwarf -- galaxies: clusters: general -- galaxies: clusters: individual: Perseus Cluster -- galaxies: luminosity function, mass function 7 0 0 2 t c O 3 ] h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 6 9 7 0 . 0 1 7 0 : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION Faint, low mass galaxies are the most numerous galaxy type in the universe, and are thus fundamental in understanding galaxy forma- tion. However, their low luminosities and low surface brightness make detailed studies of them difficult. Because dwarfs are so com- mon, any galaxy evolution/formation theory must clearly be able to predict and describe the properties of these galaxies. The luminosity functions of nearby galaxies in all environ- ments reveal that dwarf galaxies are far more common than brighter galaxies. Within galaxy clusters there furthermore appears to be an overdensity of dwarf galaxies when compared to the field. The ori- gin of these extra dwarfs, or if this excess is even real, remains un- known. The cluster luminosity function itself is not universal, but is strongly dependent on environment (Sabatini et al. 2003), with the luminosity function often steeper in the more diffuse outer re- gions of clusters than in the denser cluster cores. The luminosity function also depends on the individual cluster, with each one hav- ing a characteristic luminosity function. For example, the Fornax Cluster is compact and rich in early-type galaxies, with a flat lumi- nosity function faint-end slope of α = −1.1 (Mieske et al. 2007). The Virgo Cluster has a high abundance of spiral galaxies and has a steeper luminosity function with a faint end slope of α = −1.6 (Trentham & Hodgkin 2002; Sabatini et al. 2003). We know that both Local Group (LG) dwarf elliptical and dwarf spheroidal galaxies display varying star formation histories, with metal poor populations as old as the classical halo globular galaxies, but with evidence for star formation as little as 2-3 Gyr ago. Some low-mass LG galaxies such as Sagittarius, contain sur- prisingly high metal rich stellar populations considering their lu- minosities, as is also seen in clusters of galaxies. Previous spectro- scopic and ground based imaging has revealed that dwarfs in the core of clusters are not a simple homogeneous population, with cluster core galaxies fainter than MB = −15 containing a mix of metallicities and ages (Poggianti et al. 2001; Rakos et al. 2001; Conselice, Gallagher & Wyse 2003). The formation scenarios for dwarf galaxies fall into two cat- egories. The first of these is that dwarfs are old, primordial ob- jects (hierarchical model) (e.g. White & Frenk 1991). The second is that they have recently evolved or transformed from a progenitor galaxy population (e.g. Moore, Lake & Katz 1998). Within hierar- 2 S. J. Penny and C. J. Conselice chical models of galaxy formation, dwarf galaxies are formed from small density fluctuations in the early universe. The lowest mass systems (i.e. dwarf galaxies) form first, and massive galaxies are built from these in mergers. If star formation occurred soon after the gravitational collapse of initial density perturbations, dwarf galaxy halos would be amongst the first objects to form (e.g. Dekel & Silk 1986). Theory also predicts that such systems would form first in the densest environments, although cluster dEs would not neces- sarily contain the first stars formed in the universe. These halos could have formed their stars quite recently, if star formation was suppressed in some way (Tully et al. 2002). Dwarfs in clusters, on the other hand, could also be the rem- nants of stripped discs or dwarf irregulars. Through galaxy ha- rassment and interactions, these progenitors become morpholog- ically transformed into dEs. Cluster galaxies become stripped of their interstellar medium, and become dynamically heated by high- speed interactions with other galaxies and the gravitational po- tential of the cluster. To compensate, the galaxy loses stars, and over time the spiral can morphologically transform into a dE (Conselice, Gallagher & Wyse 2001a). This model is supported by recent observations of embedded discs in dEs in the Virgo and Fornax clusters (Barazza, Binggeli & Jergen 2002; De Rijcke et al. 2003). Distant clusters at z ≈ 0.4 are also filled with small spiral galaxies, but this population is largely absent in nearby clusters, where dwarf spheroidals make up the faint-end of the luminosity function (Moore et al. 1998). Downsizing (De Lucia at al. 2004) is the observed trend that star formation occurs later, and over more extended timescales, in smaller galaxies. In this scenario, dEs and lower mass galax- ies formed or entered clusters after the giant galaxies. Low mass galaxies on average end their star formation after the giant ellipti- cal galaxies. For example, the faint end of the red sequence in clus- ters is not formed until z < 0.8 (De Lucia at al. 2004), implying the luminosity weighted stellar populations of lower mass galaxies are younger than the stars in the giant elliptical galaxies. This seems to contradict the hierarchical method of galaxy formation, where dwarf systems form first. Also, dwarf elliptical galaxies are prefer- entially found in dense cluster environments, with few examples of isolated dEs, again contradicting the hierarchical model of galaxy formation. However, some dEs in clusters contain old stellar pop- ulations, so it is likely that multiple formation methods are needed to explain the origin of cluster dwarfs. The colour-magnitude relation (CMR) for cluster galaxies is well defined at bright magnitudes and forms a tight sequence. How- ever, it is unclear what the shape of the red sequence is at fainter magnitudes (Andreon et al. 2006). Conselice, Gallagher & Wyse (2002) find that galaxies at the brightest 4 magnitudes of Perseus obey the CMR, with the fainter candidate members showing sig- nificant scatter from the relation. In contrast, Andreon et al. (2006) and others find no deviation from the CMR at fainter magnitudes in other clusters. Instead, the faint red sequence is an extrapolation of what is observed at brighter magnitudes. With spectroscopy, we can test this directly by finding confirmed dwarf members of the cluster to establish the true form of the colour magnitude relation. Spectroscopy can also be used to measure the faint-end of the luminosity function in galaxy clusters, which is fundamental in de- scribing the galaxy population. The luminosity function contains important information on the formation and evolution of galaxies, and at low redshifts contains the combined influence of the galaxy initial mass function, and the effects of any evolutionary processes that have taken place in the cluster since its formation. cluster membership for dwarfs at MB < −16, and present the ages and metallicities of these galaxies based on the strengths of Balmer and metal absorption lines in their spectra. We confirm that twelve dwarfs are Perseus Cluster members, while the remaining objects are background galaxies. Using these results, we examine the colour-magnitude relation for the Perseus Cluster down to MB = −12.5. We also measure the luminosity function faint-end slope α based on our cluster membership results. Our main conclusion is that some dwarf galaxies in Perseus have old, metal poor pop- ulations, whilst others are younger, metal rich systems. This sug- gests that dwarf galaxies in the core of the Perseus Cluster are not a simple, homogeneous population, but require multiple scenarios for their formation. This paper is organised as follows: in § 2 we discuss the ob- servations and the selection criteria for the dwarf galaxies, § 3.1 identifies the cluster members, § 3.2 presents the colour magnitude relation, and the central luminosity function is presented in § 3.3. In § 3.4 we derive luminosity weighted ages and metallicities for the newly confirmed cluster members. A discussion of the main re- sults is presented in § 4 and these results are summarised in § 5. We assume the distance to the Perseus Cluster is 77 Mpc throughout this paper. 2 OBSERVATIONS The Perseus Cluster (Abell 426) is one of the richest nearby galaxy clusters, with a redshift v = 5366 km s−1 (Struble & Rood 1999), and at a distance D = 77 Mpc. It also has a high velocity dispersion of σ = 1324 km s−1 (Struble & Rood 1999). Despite its proximity it has not been studied in as much detail as clusters such as Virgo and Fornax, most likely due to its low Galactic latitude (b = −13◦). Candidate dwarf elliptical galaxies in Perseus for our Keck spectroscopic observations were selected from those listed in Conselice et al. (2003), and we follow the same numbering system throughout this paper. All dwarfs in this list have colours (B−R)0 < 2, and are symmetric, round or elliptical in shape, without ev- idence for star formation. All the candidates also have a central surface brightness fainter than µB = 24.0 mag arcsec−2, and have near-exponential surface brightness profiles. We restrict our study to those dwarf galaxies with MB < −12.5 to be more certain of cluster membership. For more detail of the selection process, see Conselice et al. (2003) and Conselice et al. (2002). We also observed an additional two objects not in this orig- inal list, one of which is a dwarf galaxy, and the other an irreg- ular galaxy (selected to fill the slits on one of the masks during spectroscopy). We also carried out photometry on these additional objects so they could be included on the colour-magnitude diagram presented in § 3.2. All candidates lie within the central 173 arcmin2 of the cluster, and have MB = −16 to MB = −12.5. The imaging data from which candidate dwarfs are acquired was taken using the WIYN 3.5m f/6.2 telescope located at the Kitt Peak National Observatory. Harris B and R images were acquired on the nights of 1998 November 14 and 15 under photometric con- ditions, with an average seeing of 0.7". Exposure times were 800s in the R band and 1000s in B. Flat fields were taken prior to each night of observing, and combined to create a single flat. Landolt standard star fields were obtained throughout each night, allowing us to find accurate zero points, air masses and colour terms. See Conselice et al. (2002) and Conselice et al. (2003) for details of the data reduction. In this paper, we use deep Keck spectroscopy to determine The new spectroscopic observations we present in this paper The dwarf galaxy population in the Perseus Cluster 3 Table 1. Candidate dwarf galaxies in the Perseus Cluster core Galaxy (J2000.0) (J2000.0) α δ B (mag) (B−R) (mag) vradial (km s−1) Cluster Member CGW 1* CGW 2* CGW 3 CGW 4* CGW 5 CGW 6 CGW 7 CGW 8 CGW 9 CGW 10 CGW 11* CGW 12* CGW 13* CGW 14 CGW 15* CGW 16 CGW 17 CGW 18 CGW 19 CGW 20 CGW 21 CGW 22* CGW 23* CGW 24 CGW 25 CGW 26* CGW 27 CGW 28 CGW 29 CGW 30 CGW 31 CGW 32* CGW 33 CGW 34* CGW 35 CGW 36* CGW 37 CGW 38 CGW 39 CGW 40 CGW 41 CGW 42 CGW 43* CGW 44 CGW 45 CGW 46 CGW 47 CGW 48 CGW 49 CGW 50* CGW 51 CGW 52 CGW 53 54 Irregular 03 18 53.5 03 18 53.8 03 18 54.9 03 18 55.7 03 18 55.8 03 18 57.8 03 18 59.5 03 18 59.7 03 18 59.8 03 19 00.4 03 19 03.5 03 19 04.2 03 19 04.7 03 19 05.2 03 19 05.2 03 19 06.0 03 19 06.8 03 19 09.1 03 19 09.5 03 19 10.4 03 19 12.7 03 19 13.0 03 19 14.9 03 19 15.1 03 19 15.9 03 19 17.3 03 19 17.6 03 19 18.0 03 19 18.8 03 19 20.1 03 19 21.2 03 19 22.1 03 19 22.4 03 19 24.6 03 19 24.7 03 19 24.7 03 19 26.9 03 19 27.1 03 19 31.4 03 19 31.7 03 19 33.5 03 19 36.1 03 19 38.6 03 19 39.7 03 19 41.7 03 19 42.3 03 19 43.5 03 19 45.7 03 19 46.1 03 19 55.4 03 19 56.1 03 19 56.1 03 19 58.5 03 19 48.6 03 19 05.1 +41 31 50.1 +41 32 52.3 +41 25 55.3 +41 25 54.4 +41 23 41.3 +41 24 57.6 +41 31 18.9 +41 26 40.0 +41 30 37.1 +41 29 02.4 +41 35 13.6 +41 35 20.6 +41 32 24.6 +41 25 07.0 +41 34 48.1 +41 26 18.7 +41 26 40.8 +41 32 41.7 +41 31 30.9 +41 29 37.0 +41 30 37.7 +41 34 51.8 +41 30 27.1 +41 28 56.6 +41 30 20.3 +41 34 54.5 +41 29 57.7 +41 24 25.3 +41 26 32.4 +41 24 06.6 +41 28 42.5 +41 24 27.2 +41 24 04.2 +41 25 53.4 +41 24 36.3 +41 25 52.6 +41 33 05.1 +41 27 16.1 +41 26 28.7 +41 31 21.3 +41 24 39.4 +41 32 47.4 +41 33 46.1 +41 26 39.1 +41 29 17.0 +41 34 16.6 +41 28 52.9 +41 32 18.0 +41 24 51.2 +41 25 04.4 +41 29 09.4 +41 32 38.7 +41 31 02.0 +41 33 28.6 +41 28 12.4 20.54 ± 0.02 20.01 ± 0.01 21.61 ± 0.04 20.76 ± 0.03 21.46 ± 0.03 20.06 ± 0.01 21.39 ± 0.04 19.71 ± 0.01 21.34 ± 0.02 20.26 ± 0.02 20.21 ± 0.02 20.95 ± 0.02 21.50 ± 0.02 21.87 ± 0.04 20.37 ± 0.02 19.78 ± 0.02 20.86 ± 0.05 21.57 ± 0.02 20.59 ± 0.01 19.27 ± 0.01 21.61 ± 0.04 20.10 ± 0.01 21.77 ± 0.06 21.40 ± 0.05 21.89 ± 0.05 21.97 ± 0.04 21.40 ± 0.05 21.62 ± 0.03 20.94 ± 0.03 21.34 ± 0.04 20.77 ± 0.03 20.15 ± 0.01 21.75 ± 0.05 21.75 ± 0.05 21.90 ± 0.07 21.80 ± 0.03 20.74 ± 0.03 18.48 ± 0.01 18.72 ± 0.01 19.30 ± 0.01 21.76 ± 0.08 21.82 ± 0.03 21.92 ± 0.03 21.05 ± 0.02 18.72 ± 0.01 20.67 ± 0.02 20.87 ± 0.02 21.56 ± 0.05 21.43 ± 0.03 21.06 ± 0.02 20.71 ± 0.01 21.31 ± 0.02 21.86 ± 0.03 19.75 ± 0.03 15.19 ± 0.01 0.91 ± 0.05 1.14 ± 0.05 1.80 ± 0.05 1.44 ± 0.04 1.55 ± 0.05 1.22 ± 0.04 0.89 ± 0.07 1.32 ± 0.04 0.75 ± 0.05 1.29 ± 0.05 1.09 ± 0.05 1.15 ± 0.04 1.95 ± 0.05 1.58 ± 0.06 1.09 ± 0.05 1.26 ± 0.05 1.70 ± 0.06 1.01 ± 0.04 0.91 ± 0.04 1.27 ± 0.04 1.00 ± 0.07 1.72 ± 0.04 0.85 ± 0.11 1.12 ± 0.04 1.11 ± 0.08 1.63 ± 0.06 1.64 ± 0.05 1.25 ± 0.05 1.02 ± 0.06 1.57 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.06 1.16 ± 0.04 1.90 ± 0.07 1.29 ± 0.06 1.65 ± 0.08 1.48 ± 0.05 1.43 ± 0.06 1.43 ± 0.04 1.39 ± 0.04 1.24 ± 0.04 1.55 ± 0.10 1.01 ± 0.05 1.03 ± 0.05 1.21 ± 0.05 1.42 ± 0.04 1.04 ± 0.05 1.24 ± 0.05 0.44 ± 0.11 1.41 ± 0.05 1.87 ± 0.05 1.42 ± 0.04 1.87 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.06 1.30 ± 0.04 1.41 ± 0.05 . . . . . . . . . . . . 80585 ± 182 . . . . . . . . . . . . 5845 ± 47 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6577 ± 45 . . . 46906 ± 210 67527 ± 114 7325 ± 48 8741 ± 31 . . . . . . 64780 ± 146 70320 ± 59 . . . 125580 ± 51 . . . 5110 ± 77 . . . 8662 ± 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70960 ± 23 4151 ± 59 6421 ± 50 . . . . . . 51225 ± 148 . . . . . . 3120 ± 27 . . . 2886 ± 48 . . . 8457 ± 38 . . . 69132 ± 82 40994 ± 105 64495 ± 79 3363 ± 38 4027 ± 39 . . . . . . . . . . . . N . . . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . N N Y Y . . . . . . N N . . . N . . . Y . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N Y Y . . . . . . N . . . . . . Y . . . Y . . . Y . . . N N N Y Y * Not targeted for spectroscopy Units of right ascension are hours, minutes and seconds, and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes and arcseconds. Magni- tudes and colours are taken from Conselice et al. (2003). 54 and the irregular galaxies are additional objects to the original list in Conselice et al. (2003). Galaxies flagged with an * were not targeted in our spectroscopy, but are included in the colour-magnitude relation and luminosity function for the Perseus Cluster. 4 S. J. Penny and C. J. Conselice Table 2. Potential background cluster members α δ Galaxy (J2000.0) (J2000.0) CGW 19 CGW 24 CGW 25 CGW 37 CGW 51 CGW 53 03 19 09.5 03 19 15.1 03 19 15.9 03 19 26.9 03 19 56.1 03 19 58.5 +41 31 30.9 +41 28 56.6 +41 30 20.3 +41 33 05.1 +41 29 09.4 +41 31 02.0 z 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.22 were taken using the Keck Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS) (Oke et al. 1995) on the Keck I Telescope on 2002 Novem- ber 26 and 27. Using four LRIS masks, we targeted forty-one dwarf galaxies, and one irregular, and potentially interacting, galaxy in the Perseus Cluster. Successful spectra were obtained for twenty-three dwarf galaxy candidates from Conselice et al. (2003), and the potentially interacting galaxy. The spectra were taken with an average seeing of 1.1" under clear, but non-photometric, conditions. We obtained spectroscopy with both the red and blue sides of LRIS. On the blue side we used a 400 line mm−1 grism blazed at 3400 A, whilst on the red side we used a 600 line mm−1 grating blazed at 5000 A, producing effective resolutions of 8 and 6 A, respectively. The spectra were bias subtracted, flat-fielded and rectified using IRAF1 reduction techniques for multi-slit data. This combined the various frames into a single one, from which the spectra for the individual dwarf galaxies could be extracted separately. The positions and photometric properties of all our science ob- jects are listed in Table 1. The radial velocities in Table 1 are gener- ally measured on the red spectra, where the wavelength calibration was more reliable, and include heliocentric corrections. The errors on the radial velocities are based on uncertainties in the wavelength calibration, and determined by measuring the wavelengths of sky- lines in the spectra and comparing these to expected values. The difference in the actual and expected positions of the skylines were then converted into a velocity error. We also obtained Hubble Space Telescope (HST ) Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) imaging in the F555W and F814W bands (Penny et al. 2008, in preparation), from which we obtain high resolution images of several of our cluster dwarfs and non- members. 3 RESULTS 3.1 Cluster membership Using our spectra we identify absorption features such as the Mg b and Fe5270 lines, as well as Balmer lines such as Hβ. From these lines we derive the radial velocities of each of the dwarfs through comparing the measured absorption lines with those of known early-type galaxy spectra by identifying well known lines by eye. We find that twelve of the dwarf candidates are at approxi- mately the radial velocity of the Perseus Cluster, v ≈ 5366 km s−1 1 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation (Struble & Rood 1999), with the remaining eleven galaxies with ra- dial velocities placing them outside the cluster. All cluster members are within 2.5σ of the mean value of the radial velocity obtained by Struble & Rood (1999). Several of the non-cluster members show strong emission lines in their spectra. Interestingly, a number of the background galaxies are at the same redshift (z ≈ 0.23) and could be members of a background cluster. The positions and redshifts of these galaxies are listed in Table 2. The mean radial velocity for the dwarfs is 5750 ± 43 km s−1, slightly higher than the value of ≈ 5366 km s−1 found by Struble & Rood (1999). Struble & Rood (1999) found a velocity dispersion σ = 1324 km s−1 for galaxies in the Perseus Cluster, and we re-measure this value using just our newly confirmed dwarf galaxy members. We find a velocity dispersion for the dwarfs of σ = 1818 km s−1, again higher than that found by Struble & Rood (1999) for bright galaxies in the Perseus Cluster. The Perseus Clus- ter however has a complex X-ray morphology (Fabian et al. 1981), and is also not a simple, relaxed system. Conselice et al. (2001a) find a similar result for the dwarf el- liptical population of the Virgo Cluster, where the velocity disper- sion of the ellipticals is 462 km s−1, whilst the velocity dispersion of the dwarf elliptical population is 726 km s−1. The fact that the velocity dispersion of dwarf ellipticals is higher than the overall cluster is potentially a sign that the dwarfs may originate from in- falling galaxies. Dwarf ellipticals could originate from spiral galax- ies that are stripped of mass by high-speed interactions. These dwarfs would retain the velocity characteristics of the original in- falling spirals, having velocity dispersions higher than the cluster ellipticals, reflecting the mass distribution of the cluster when the galaxies were accreted. Dwarfs that lie in the central parts of clus- ters are also susceptible to cannibalism and destruction. Therefore dwarfs would be found preferentially in the outer parts of clusters at high velocity dispersion as these are the most likely dwarfs to survive in the cluster environment. Also, we cannot rule out mass segregation occurring (Conselice et al. 2001a). 3.1.1 HST ACS imaging Deep HST ACS imaging reveals detail not seen in the ground based WIYN imaging (Figures 1 and 2). From such images, galax- ies such as background spirals are more easily identified. All the confirmed cluster members are elliptical in shape, with no evidence for internal sub-structure (Fig. 1). It is clear from Fig. 2 that three of the non-members (CGW 19, 27 and 37) are spiral galaxies, al- though this detail is not seen in the original WIYN imaging pre- sented in Conselice et al. (2003), and as a result were incorrectly classified as potential cluster members. 3.2 The colour-magnitude relation There exists a well-defined colour-magnitude relationship amongst the non-dwarf early-type galaxy population in galaxy clusters, such that brighter galaxies are redder. This correlation is generally re- garded as a relationship between a galaxy's mass (traced by magni- tude) and metallicity (traced by colour). Using our newly confirmed cluster dwarfs, we investigate whether this relationship extends to the dwarf galaxy population of the Perseus Cluster. Our photome- try is taken from Conselice et al. (2003), as well as including some additional photometry on objects not included in Conselice et al. (2003). Our colour-magnitude diagram is shown in Figure 3, with the The dwarf galaxy population in the Perseus Cluster 5 Figure 1. Montage of HST ACS images of the confirmed Perseus Cluster dwarfs (galaxies 10, 20, 21, 31, 45, and 47). The number at the upper right of each image is MB, the number on the bottom right is the (B−R)0 colour, and the number on the left is the galaxy number from Conselice et al. (2003). Figure 2. Montage of HST ACS images of the non-members (galaxies 18, 19, 24, 25, 27, 37, 42, and 51). The number at the upper right of each image is MB (assuming the galaxy is at the distance of Perseus), the number on the bottom right is the (B−R)0 colour, and the number on the left is the galaxy number from Conselice et al. (2003). 6 S. J. Penny and C. J. Conselice solid line a least-squares fit found by Conselice et al. (2003) to the bright cluster ellipticals, and the dashed line an extension of this fit to fainter magnitudes. We carry out a least squares fit to this data using only confirmed members to establish a relation between the colour and magnitude for the confirmed population of Perseus as a whole. This is shown as the dotted line on the colour-magnitude diagram. This fit is slightly steeper than the relationship found by Conselice et al. (2002) for the brighter cluster galaxies in Perseus. The scatter in the colour magnitude relation for the cluster members is small (σ = 0.05) down to MB = −15.5, but increases to σ = 0.11 at magnitudes fainter than this. The degree of colour scatter for the cluster member fainter than MB = −15.5 is real, based on a comparison to the photometric errors, to a 2σ confi- dence level. The confirmed faint cluster members that depart from the colour-magnitude relation (CMR), tend to be a bluer than the CMR. These bluer dwarfs are most likely metal poor, as spectro- scopic results from previous studies have shown (Held & Mould 1994, Lotz et al. 2004). The redder colours of two of the dwarf galaxies implies that they may have gone through a process of metal enrichment (Conselice et al. 2001a). These dwarfs are also likely part of a dwarf galaxy population that have a different origin to the blue dwarfs. Conselice et al. (2003) suggest that the most likely origin for these red dwarfs is from infalling spirals. The red clus- ter dwarfs are most likely not primordial objects, and would have intermediate or young stellar populations. From the colour magnitude diagram, it appears that galaxies with (B−R)0 > 1.6 (i.e. the reddest elliptical) are not cluster mem- bers. We find no confirmed cluster members with (B−R)0 > 1.6, although there are non-cluster members with (B−R)0 less than this, so cluster membership cannot be determined by colour and mor- phology alone for more distant clusters such as Perseus. Radial ve- locities obtained via spectroscopy are required as non-cluster mem- bers can have colours and structures similar to cluster members, as can be seen on the colour-magnitude diagram in Fig. 3. However, morphology can still be a useful tool in determining cluster mem- bership in more distant clusters from high resolution imaging, as our HST observations have shown. Broadband (B−R)0 colours also reveal information about the nature of the stellar populations in dwarf galaxies, and scatter from the colour-magnitude relationship can be partly explained by the amount of metal enrichment that has occurred. A broad metal- licity distribution has been inferred for dwarfs in other galaxy populations such as Fornax and Coma (e.g. Poggianti et al. 2001; Rakos & Schombert 2004), where a breakdown in the colour- magnitude relation is seen below M5550 = −17. Age effects are also likely important in the colours of low-mass dwarf galaxies, with chaotic star formation histories in such galaxies. We inves- tigate this further in § 3.4 using absorption line indices to derive luminosity weighted ages and metallicities for our dwarfs. 3.3 The central luminosity function One of the main reasons for fitting luminosity functions is to de- termine the relative number of faint systems compared to brighter galaxies. This is typically done by measuring the value of the faint-end slope α, with values typically in the range ≈ −1 and −2.3 in clusters (Conselice et al. 2002; Mieske et al. 2007; Beijersbergen et al. 2002). Previous to this study, values were found for the faint-end slope α = −1.56 ± 0.07 and −1.44 ± 0.04 (De Propris & Pritchett 1998; Conselice et al. 2002) in the central regions of the Perseus Cluster. We refit this luminosity function after removing all galax- Figure 3. Colour magnitude diagram for dwarf galaxies in the Perseus Clus- ter, taken from Conselice et al. (2003). We include all objects with MB < −12.5. All the dwarfs listed in Table 1 are included in this plot. The solid line represents the fit between colour and magnitude for the objects with MB < −16, with the dashed line the extension of the fit to fainter magni- tudes. The dotted line is the colour-magnitude relation for the cluster ellip- ticals and dwarf galaxies. ies now classified as non-cluster members, and those with (B−R)0 > 1.6 (the colour of the reddest elliptical) from the luminosity func- tion in Conselice et al. (2002). Galaxies with (B−R)0 > 1.6 are not included in the luminosity function as they are most likely not clus- ter members. Figure 4 shows our new luminosity function to a limiting mag- nitude of MB − 12.5. We fit this luminosity function with a power law, of the form dN/dL = Lα. Galaxies are binned according to their magnitude, and a fit was made to the number counts using a least-squares. The resulting fit is shown in Figure 4 as a solid line. We find the faint end slope to be α = −1.26 ± 0.06. This value is flatter than that found previously by Conselice et al. (2002). Importantly, our value of α also matches that of the field, with Trentham, Sampson & Banerji (2005) finding an average logarith- mic fit of α = −1.26 ± 0.11 for the field luminosity function. This result implies that there is no difference between the relative den- sity of dwarf galaxies to giant galaxies in the field and in the centre of the Perseus Cluster. It is worth mentioning that the determination of the faint end slope is strongly dependent on the technique used to derive the lu- minosity function, in particular how the cluster members are de- termined. The selection process for cluster members as outlined in Conselice et al. (2002) along with the spectroscopic technique for selecting cluster members in this study has led to us removing all dwarfs with (B−R)0 > 1.6. Other methods used to determine clus- ter membership include selecting dwarfs according to their mor- phology and surface brightness profiles (e.g. Trentham & Hodgkin 2002). Another method is to perform a background subtraction, with the luminosity function determined from a measurement of the excess of galaxies relative to the field Phillips et al. (1998a). The dwarf galaxy population in the Perseus Cluster 7 ibrated ones by <1%, and this does not contribute significantly to our errors (Strader et al. 2003). The spectra were then smoothed us- ing a wavelength-dependent Gaussian kernel to match the Lick/IDS resolution of ∼8-10 A (Worthey & Ottaviani 1997). In our analysis, we measured the the Balmer line indices HαA, HαF , Hβ, and the metal line indices Mg b, Fe λ5270 and Fe λ5335 using the passband definitions in Trager et al. (1998) and Nelan et al. (2005). We tested our method on model spectra pro- vided online by Guy Worthey, and our line measurements matched the expected ones to < 5%. We were unable to obtain Lick stan- dards during our observations, so we are not able to provide an off- set between our observations and the Lick System. However, when Brodie et al. (2005) measured the Lick indices on six standard stars under an identical LRIS set-up, no significant deviations from the Lick system were found. The offsets found are typically smaller than the index errors that they measured, so were not applied to the indices. Therefore, it was not necessary to apply an offset between our observations and the Lick System. The strengths of metal lines can be influenced by the ages of the stellar populations, as well as by their metallicity. This com- plicates the process of constraining the metallicities of the dwarf galaxies. However, when a Balmer index is plotted against a metal line, it yields a two-dimensional theoretical grid from which the luminosity weighted ages and metallicities can be estimated. Sev- eral models exist that predict the Lick indices for SSPs at various metallicities and ages, with the models used throughout this pa- per being those of Thomas, Maraston & Bender (2003) and Smith (2005). The Thomas et al. (2003) models cover lines in the wave- length range 4000 A . λ . 6500 A, which is not sufficient to cover the Hα line. We use the Smith (2005) models to compare with this index. 3.4.1 Ages and metallicities Before deriving the ages and metallicities for our Perseus dwarfs, we estimated the [α/Fe] values for our galaxies. The α elements are created rapidly in Type II supernovae, while iron is produced by Type Ia supernovae on longer timescales. By examining the lo- cation of our dwarf galaxies on a plot of <Fe> versus Mg b, we can derive likely values of [α/Fe] for our cluster dwarfs (Fig 5). Mg b is an indicator of the α elements, and <Fe> = 1 2 (Fe5270 + Fe5335). We find that two of our dwarfs are consistent with super- solar abundance ratios ([α/Fe] ≈ +0.3). Super-solar abundances are consistent with older stellar populations, such as globular clus- ters and elliptical galaxies. Super-solar [α/Fe] indicate that enrich- ment from Type II SNe has taken place. The Thomas et al. (2003) models converge at low metallicities, and our errors are not small enough to reject lower [α/Fe] ratios. Therefore, we use a value of [α/Fe] = 0.3 when determining the ages and metallicities for our dwarfs. Other studies have found [α/Fe] ratios as high as this in a dwarf population (e.g. Conselice 2006). To measure the ages of our Perseus dwarfs, we first compare our measured Hα indices to the Smith (2005) single stellar popu- lation models of HαA and HαF , as a function of age and metal- licity (Fig 6), with metallicities [Fe/H] = −0.38, 0.00, +0.32, and +0.56, although we exclude the [Fe/H] = +0.32 model for simplic- ity in Figure 6. These models assume solar-scaled chemical abun- dance ratios, whereas we have found our dwarfs to have super-solar abundance ratios. However, this model is thought to be more robust against variation in [α/Fe] than the higher order Balmer lines. The Hα line has a weak response to metallicity variations, so it should Figure 4. The luminosity function for galaxies with MB > −18 and (B−R)0 < 1.6 in the central region of Perseus. The solid line is the least- squares fit to the data. This method can lead to a very steep faint end slope, due to con- tamination from background galaxies. Moore et al. (1998) explain the dwarf-density relation as the result of galaxy harassment. Harassment operates more effectively in denser regions, such as cluster cores. Tidal effects become in- creasingly important in the inner regions of clusters, with smaller galaxies more easily destroyed in cluster centres. This could ex- plain why we find a faint-end slope α equal to that of the field, as the lowest mass galaxies are simply not able to survive in the innermost regions of galaxy clusters. 3.4 Ages & metallicities from Lick indices Measurements of the ages and metallicities of the stellar popula- tions in our dwarfs are made using the spectra of the newly con- firmed members. The strength of the Balmer absorption lines in a stellar population reflect the luminosity-weighted effective tem- perature of the system, which is dominated by the main-sequence turnoff (e.g. Smith 2005). In a single stellar population (SSP) model, the tun-off luminosity and temperature depend on the age of the stellar population. To measure the equivalent widths if our absorption lines we follow the procedure outlined in Brodie & Huchra (1990) who measured the indices of globular clusters with low-resolution spectra. We measure Lick indices from our spectra to determine ages and metallicities for our dwarfs (Worthey & Ottaviani 1997; Trager et al. 1998; Nelan et al. 2005), although it was not possible to measure every absorption feature for each galaxy. These indices are calculated with respect to pseudo-continua, defined on either side of the feature bandpass. We can be sure that there is no star formation occurring in our dwarfs based on deep Hα narrow-band imaging of these galaxies (Conselice, Gallagher & Wyse 2001b). The line-strength indices are computed by first shifting the galaxy spectra to their rest-frame wavelengths. We did not flux cal- ibrate our data, but flux calibrated indices differ from non-flux cal- 8 S. J. Penny and C. J. Conselice Figure 5. Relationship between the <Fe> index and the Mg b index for the cluster dwarfs. Model predictions by Thomas et al. (2003) for the relation- ship between <Fe> and Mg b are plotted for the abundance ratios [α/Fe] = 0.0, +0.3 and +0.5. The dotted lines represent the model predictions for the ages 1, 5, 8, 11 and 15 Gyr, with age increasing from left to right. The dashed lines represent the model metallicities of -2.25, -1.35, -0.33, 0.0 and +0.35, with metallicity increasing from bottom to top. Figure 6. Comparison between the HαA indices for our dwarf galaxies and the [Fe/H] = 0.00 model from Smith (2005) (dashed line) of how HαA evolves as a function of time. The models for [Fe/H] = −0.38, +0.56 are also plotted as solid lines. The points are the measured values of Hαa that we obtained from our dwarf spectra plotted at the ages at which these values are expected in the [Fe/H] = 0.00 model be a good indicator of stellar ages in integrated spectra. Several ages are seen within the dwarfs, with some having ages > 5 Gyr, and the remaining a younger population. By combining a metal index with a Balmer index, we can place constraints on the luminosity-weighted ages and metallicities of the stellar populations of the newly confirmed Perseus dwarfs. We use the Mg b index for this purpose, as well as the <Fe> in- dex. Figure 7 shows that at least one of the Perseus dwarfs is lo- cated in the low-metallicity, and old age part of the Hβ-Mg b di- agram, with ages ∼ 8 ± 3 Gyr and metallicities [Fe/H] < -0.33 at a 3σ confidence level. There is also a younger, more metal rich dwarf with age ∼ 3 ± 2 Gyr and [Fe/H] ∼ 0.35. Comparing the Hβ indices to the <Fe> indices produces similar results, with one dwarf galaxy having an age of 11 ± 3 Gyr, and with a metallicity less than [Fe/H] = −0.33. Within the error bars, another dwarf is potentially older than 5 Gyr and again has [Fe/H] < −1.35. One dwarf is clearly much younger (< 5 ± 3 Gyr) and more metal rich ([Fe/H] > −0.33. The remaining two galaxies lie below the grid so it is not possible to make estimates for their ages and metallicities, but they are most likely older (> 8 Gyr) and metal poor systems. The differences in age and metallicity measured throughout this paper are real to 2-3σ. We also compare the Hβ and the [α/Fe]-insensitive in- dex [MgFe]' = [(Mgb)(0.72 × Fe5270 + 0.28 × Fe5335)]0.5 (Thomas et al. 2003). This index servers as the best tracer of the overall metallicity, Hβ is also less sensitive than the other Balmer line indices to metallicity. Again, we find the same results with two old, metal poor dwarfs ([Fe/H] < −1.35, age > 8 Gyr), and one metal rich, young dwarf ([Fe/H] > −0.33, age < 5 Gyr). We find several Hβ indices that are too low to be fitted by the Thomas et al. (2003) models. This has been previously observed in the spectra of dwarf galaxies by Poggianti et al. (2001), who sug- gest that current models overestimate the turnoff temperatures in the models. Such galaxies are interpreted as old stellar systems, with ages > 8 Gyr for the purposes of this paper. 3.5 Comparison of colour with age and metallicity Dwarf ellipticals without star formation that are blue in colour are expected to be metal poor, whereas those with redder colours are expected to be metal rich. Unfortunately, we are unable to derive ages and metallicities for the two redder dwarfs (galaxies CGW 31 and CGW 49), as not all the spectral features could be measured reliably. One galaxy, 54 (Table 1), is younger and more metal rich than the other dwarfs for which we obtained a good set of indices. It has an age < 5 Gyr, and a metallicity [Fe/H] > -0.33. The (B−R)0 colour of this particular galaxy is 1.22, and it lies on the fit between colour and magnitude for the cluster ellipticals and dwarf galaxies. The other galaxies for which ages and metallicities are determined are CGW 16, and CGW 20. These galaxies are metal poor and have (B−R)0 colours of 1.18, 1.19 and 1.16 respectively. These galaxies again lie close to the colour-magnitude relation for the cluster ellip- ticals and dwarf galaxies. Therefore it appears that both young and old dwarf galaxies in Perseus lie on the same colour-magnitude re- lation. This is confirmed with ages obtained using the HαA index, when again both young and old dwarf galaxies in Perseus lie on the same colour-magnitude relation. We find no correlation between either metallicity or age, de- termined using the HαA index, with (B−R)0 colour as shown in Figures 8a and 8b. However, we do find a clear anti-correlation be- tween age and metallicity (Fig. 8c). The older the dwarf elliptical, Table 3. Line-strength indices The dwarf galaxy population in the Perseus Cluster 9 Mg b . . . <Fe> [MgFe]' HαA HαF . . . . . . 3.0 ± 0.5 1.9 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.2 0.36 ± 0.1 0.70 ± 0.1 0.38 ± 0.2 0.96 ± 0.3 . . . . . . 1.6 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.1 . . . 2.5 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.71 ± 0.2 0.36 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.2 0.56 ± 0.2 0.69 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0.5 . . . 1.2 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.3 1.8 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.4 Galaxy CGW 10 CGW 16 CGW 20 CGW 21 CGW 29 CGW 31 CGW 38 CGW 39 CGW 45 CGW 47 CGW 49 54 Hβ 2.7 ± 0.5 3.8 ± 0.7 2.5 ± 0.4 . . . . . . . . . 1.7 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.5 . . . 2.35 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 0.5 2.8 ± 1.2 1 Line-strength indices as determined by the definitions in Trager et al. (1998) and Nelan et al. (2005). The combined iron index is defined as <Fe> = 2 (Fe5270+Fe5335) and the [α/Fe]-insensitive index [MgFe]' is defined as [MgFe]' = [(Mgb)(0.72 × Fe5270 + 0.28 × Fe5335)]0.5 (Thomas et al. 2003). Not every index was measured for every galaxy. Figure 7. Plot of Hβ versus Mg b, <Fe> and [MgFe]' (left to right respectively) for the Perseus dwarfs superimposed on Thomas et al. (2003) model isochrones and isometallicity lines for [α/Fe] = 0.3. The different ages and metallicities are labelled. (a) (b) (c) Figure 8. (a) Plot of (B−R)0 colour against the Mg b index to show how metallicity varies with colour. (b) (B−R)0 colour plotted against ages determined using the HαA index. (c) Plot of age against the Mg b index to show how age varies with metallicity. 10 S. J. Penny and C. J. Conselice Figure 9. WIYN Harris R band image of the irregular galaxy at α = 03 19 05.1, δ = +41 28 12.4. The solid black line in this figure is 10" in length. the more metal poor it is. This has been found in previous studies such as that of Poggianti et al. (2001), who find an anti-correlation between age and metallicity for galaxies in the Coma Cluster in any luminosity bin. 3.6 Irregular galaxy We also obtained a spectrum of an irregular galaxy at α = 03 19 05.1 and δ = +41 28 12.4. From the absorption lines, this galaxy was found to be at a radial velocity of 4032 ± 39 km s−1, con- firming it as a member of the Perseus Cluster. A second object was present in the slit for this galaxy, which had Balmer lines in emis- sion in its spectrum. Based on the positions of these emission lines, the additional object was found to be at z ≈ 0.055, giving the object a radial velocity of ≈ 16500 km s−1. This would make it either a background galaxy, or an interacting galaxy with a velocity differ- ence of ≈ 12450 km s−1 from the main galaxy. From the image of this galaxy, a tidal tail is clearly visible to the left hand side of the galaxy as seen in Figure 9. This irregu- lar galaxy is therefore most likely a merged system. Assuming the Perseus Cluster is at a distance of 77 Mpc, this tidal tail has a length of ≈ 7.5 kpc. 4 INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION We find that the radial velocity dispersion for dwarf galaxies, σ = 1818 km s−1, is higher than the value of 1324 km s−1 found by Struble & Rood (1999) for the giant galaxies in Perseus. These re- sults agree with results found by Conselice et al. (2001a) for dwarf galaxies in the Virgo Cluster. An infall origin for dwarfs can explain this difference in velocity dispersion between the brighter cluster galaxies and the dwarfs. Infalling spirals can become morphologi- cally transformed into dwarf ellipticals by high speed interactions with other cluster galaxies, and by the gravitational potential of the cluster itself (harassment). Another possibility is that infalling dark matter halos enter the cluster at later times, with the gas in the halos being converted into stars due to tidal forces during the cluster as- sembly. The velocity characteristics of low-mass, infalling galaxies should change little over several gigayears, thus the velocity dis- persion would represent the mass profile of the cluster at the time of accretion. We also find in Perseus an increase in the scatter of the colour- magnitude relation for magnitudes fainter that MB = −15.5, which can be interpreted as a diversity in the ages and metallicities of the low mass systems. A range in the ages and metallicities of low- mass systems suggests that dwarf galaxies are not a homogeneous population, as redder, more metal rich cluster dwarfs must have been formed more recently than the blue population. De Lucia at al. (2004) suggest that a large fraction of faint red galaxies in current clusters moved onto the colour-magnitude rela- tion relatively recently, with their star formation activity coming to an end at around z ≈ 0.8. Clusters at redshift z ≈ 1 have a deficit of red-sequence galaxies, with the dwarf cluster population becom- ing progressively fewer in number as we move out to increasing redshifts. The rate of infalling spiral galaxies is expected to peak at z ≈ 0.8 in a CDM cosmology with ΩM = 1 and H0 = 50 km s−1 (Kauffmann 1995), the same redshift at which De Lucia at al. (2004) suggest a large fraction of faint red galaxies in current clus- ters moved onto the colour-magnitude relation. If dEs are indeed formed from infalling spirals, it seems likely that they originate from this epoch. We find that the faint-end luminosity function is less steep than what was found in previous studies of the Perseus Cluster, and in fact matches the value of α = −1.26 found by Trentham et al. (2005) for the field. We remove all galaxies incorrectly classified as dwarfs by Conselice et al. (2003) from the luminosity function, to refit this faint end slope. The shape of the luminosity function at faint magnitudes is dependent on many processes, one of which is the efficiency at which gas is converted into stars (e.g. Dekel & Silk (1986). Gas loss from supernova driven winds would reduce the star formation efficiency. Star formation and/or nuclear activity in dwarf galax- ies could also photoionize the intergalactic medium, regulating the galaxy formation process (Efstathiou 1992). Another effect on the faint-end slope is that dark halos in denser, evolved clusters are more efficient at collecting gas used to form stars than those in un- evolved clusters (Trentham & Hodgkin 2002). Yet another process changing the shape of the faint end slop is dynamical stripping of higher mass galaxies that would increase the number of low-mass systems in a cluster (Conselice 2002). Also, dwarfs in the inner re- gions of dense clusters are less able to survive due to harassment (Moore et al. 1998), causing the faint-end slope to flatten for such environments. Whilst our value of α = −1.26 ± 0.06 for dwarfs in the Perseus Cluster core is comparable with that of the field, it is also similar to the value of α = −1.23 ± 0.13 (Pracy et al. 2004) in the core region of Abell 2218. In Abell 2218, the slope of the lu- minosity function varies with cluster environment, going from α = −1.23 ± 0.13 in the central core of the cluster to α = −1.49 ± 0.06 outside of the core. Pracy et al. (2004) infer that the core of Abell 2218 is "dwarf depleted", with the dwarf-to-giant ratio decreasing monotonically with increasing cluster density. Galaxy clusters with less prominent dwarf populations are in fact those with the highest projected galaxy densities (Phillipps et al 1998b). The reason for this depletion in the core regions of clusters can perhaps be explained by galaxy harassment. Tidal effects become more important in the centre of clusters, with smaller spheroidal The dwarf galaxy population in the Perseus Cluster 11 galaxies being easily destroyed (Conselice 2002). The lowest sur- face brightness objects will disintegrate in the inner regions, de- creasing the dwarf-to-giant ratio, whilst in outer regions such galax- ies would be able to survive. More recently, Harsono & De Propris (2007) find no evidence for a faint-end upturn in the luminosity function in clusters at z = 0.3. There will be less contamination from background galaxies in clusters at these redshifts, and therefore such galaxies would not artificially steepen the faint-end slope to the degree seen in local clusters. Harsono & De Propris (2007) argue that the faint-end up- turn in the LF in nearby clusters is of recent origin, although our results could contradict this theory as we find no evidence for a faint-end slope upturn. A hierarchical model of galaxy formation predicts that within a given environment, low-mass galaxies would be the first to form. However, it appears that many low mass galaxies finish forming after the giants, through "downsizing". For example, results from De Lucia at al. (2004) suggest that a large fraction of dwarf galax- ies in current clusters moved onto the red sequence relatively re- cently, with a cessation in star formation activity at z ≪ 0.8. This is also seen for field galaxies (Bundy et al. 2006), suggesting down- sizing is a possible origin for dwarf galaxies in both environments. We find both old, metal-poor dwarfs and young, metal rich dwarfs in Perseus. This is consistent with results by Poggianti et al. (2001) for faint galaxies in Coma, where dwarf galaxies occupy a large region on the SSP model grid, covering a range of metallicity and ages, with most lying in the region [Fe/H] < −0.25 and ages < 1 Gyr. These results imply that downsizing is a real effect, with the younger dwarfs ending star formation at some time after the giant cluster members. Whilst some dwarfs are indeed primordial, not all cluster dwarfs are old. The formation of these young dwarfs may involve the removal of mass from infalling higher-mass spirals (e.g. Conselice et al. 2003). 5 CONCLUSIONS We have analysed Keck/LRIS spectra for twenty-three dwarf galaxy candidates in the Perseus Cluster, from which we have con- firmed cluster membership for twelve systems based on radial ve- locities measured from absorption lines. We extend the confirmed member colour-magnitude relation for Perseus down to MB = −12.5, finding that the slope of the colour-magnitude relation becomes bluer when the low-surface brightness dwarf galaxies are included. The fainter dwarfs also scatter more from the colour-magnitude relation, following the trend observed by Rakos & Schombert (2004) for low-mass galax- ies in Fornax and Coma. This scatter can be interpreted as a spread in the metallicity distributions of dwarf galaxies, which has been inferred for dwarf galaxies in other clusters by Rakos et al. (2001) and Poggianti et al. (2001). After removing non-members from the B-band luminosity function for the Perseus Cluster we find a faint-end slope α = −1.26 ± 0.06, similar to the field. Previous studies of other galaxy clusters have found that the dwarf-to-giant ratio is a function of local projected galaxy density. Extending this study to the outer regions of Perseus would enable us to see how the luminosity func- tion changes with the local galaxy density. Colours, morphologies, and central surface brightnesses are not sufficient criteria to confirm cluster membership, as this work has shown. Cluster membership cannot be confirmed without spectroscopy, so the faint-end luminosity functions calculated for galaxy clusters where membership has not been confirmed spectro- scopically are most likely artificially steepened by non-members resulting in higher dwarf-to-giant ratios. By comparing the observed dwarf spectral absorption indices with population synthesis models of Thomas et al. (2003), we de- rive luminosity-weighted ages and metallicities for the dwarf galax- ies. A range of ages is observed, ranging from older than 8 Gyr to younger than 5 Gyr. The metallicity distribution of the faint cluster members is also not that of a simple homogeneous population, with the younger galaxies typically having higher metallicities. More observations of dwarf galaxies in rich, nearby cluster en- vironments are required in order to help improve our understanding of the formation scenarios for cluster dwarfs. Further spectroscopic work with a larger sample would also allow better constraints on the ages and metallicities of cluster dwarf galaxies and would help with modelling the formation of such galaxies. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Labora- tory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration. We thank the staff of Keck, WIYN and NOAO for help in obtaining the spectroscopy and imaging presented here. We also thank Jay Gallagher for help with the WIYN optical imaging, and Dolf Michielsen for useful advice. S. J. P. acknowledges the support of a PPARC studentship. We also wish to acknowledge the highly significant cultural role and rever- ence that the indigenous Hawaiian community hold for the summit of Mauna Kea. It is a privilege to be able to conduct observations from this mountain. REFERENCES Andreon, S., Cuillandre, J. C., Puddu, E., Mellier, Y., 2006, MN- RAS, 372, 60 Barazza, F. D., Binggeli, B., Jergen, H., 2002, A&A, 391, 823 Beijersbergen, M., Hoekstra, H., van Dokkum, P. G., van der Hulst, T., 2002, MNRAS, 329, 385 Brodie, J. P., Huchra, J. P., 1990, ApJ, 362, 503 Brodie, J. P., Strader, J.,Denicol´o, G., Beasley, M. A., Cenarro, A. J., Larsen, S. S., Kuntscner, H., Forbes, D. A., 2005, AJ, 129, 2643 Bundy, K., et al, 2006, ApJ, 651, 120 Conselice, C. J., 2002, ApJ, 573, L5 Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, J. S., III, Wyse, R. F. G., 2001a, ApJ, 559, 791 Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, J. S., III, Wyse, R. F. G., 2001b, AJ, 122, 2281 Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, J. S., III, Wyse, R. F. G., 2002, AJ, 123, 2246 Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, J. S., III, Wyse, R. F. G., 2003, AJ, 125, 66 Conselice, C. J., 2006, ApJ, 639, 120 De Lucia, G., et al., 2004, ApJ, 610, L77 De Propris, R., Pritchett, C. J., 1998, AJ, 116, 1118 De Rijcke, S., Dejonghe, H., Zeilinger, W. W., Hau, G. K. T., 2003, A&A, 400, 119 Dekel, A., Silk, J., 1986, ApJ, 303, 39 12 S. J. Penny and C. J. Conselice Efstathiou, G., 1992, MNRAS, 256, 43p Fabian, A. C., Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., Grindlay, J., 1981, ApJ, 248, 47 Harsono, D., De Propis, R., 2007, MNRAS, accepted (astro-ph 0706.2994) Held, E. V., Mould, J. R., 1994, AJ, 107, 1307 Kauffmann, G., 1995, MNRAS, 274, 153 Kent, S. M., Sargent, W. L. W., 1983, AJ, 88, 6 Lotz, J. M., Miller, B. W., Ferguson, H. C., 2004, ApJ, 613, 262 Mieske, S., Hilker, M., Infante, L., Mendes de Oliveira, C., 2007, A&A, 463, 503. Mobasher, B., et al., 2003, ApJ, 587, 605 Moore, B., Lake, G., Katz, N., 1998, ApJ, 495, 139 Nelan, J. E., Smith, R. J., Hudson, M. J., Wegner G. A., Lucey, J. R., Moore, S. A. W., Quinney, S. J., Suntzeff, N. B., 2005, ApJ, 632, 137 Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr, M., Cromer, J., Dingizian, A., Har- ris, F. H., 1995, PASP, 107, 375 Phillips, S., Parker, Q. A., Schwartzenberg, J. M., Jones, J. B., 1998a, ApJ, 493, L59 Phillipps, S., Driver, S. P., Couch, W. J., Smith, R. M., 1998b, ApJ, 498, L119 Poggianti, B. M., et al., 2001, ApJ, 562, 689 Pracy, M. B., De Propris, R., Driver, S. P., Couch, W. J., Nulsen, P. E. J., 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1135 Rakos, K., Schombert, J., Maitzen, H. M., Prugovecki, S., Odell, A., 2001, AJ, 121, 1974 Rakos, K., Schombert, J., 2004, AJ, 127, 1502 Sabatini, S., Davies, J., Scaramella, R., Smith, R., Baes, M., Lin- der, S. M., Roberts, S., Testa, V., 2003, MNRAS, 341, 981 Smith, R. J., 2005, MNRAS, 359, 975 Strader, J., Brodie, J. P., Schweizer, F., Larsen, S. S., Seitzer, P., 2003, AJ, 125, 626 Struble, M. F., Rood, H. J., 1999, ApJS, 125, 36 Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., 2003, MNRAS, 339, 897 Trager, S. C., Worthey, G., Faber , S. M., Burnstein, D., Gonz´alez, J. J., 1998, ApJS, 116, 1 Trager, S. C., Faber, S. M., Worthey, G., Gonz´alez, J. J., 2000, AJ, 119, 1645 Trentham, N., Hodgkin, S., 2002, MNRAS, 333, 423 Trentham, N., Sampson, L., Banerji, M., 2005, MNRAS, 357, 783 Tully, R. B., Somerville, R. S., Trentham, N., Verheijen, M. A. W., 2002, ApJ, 569, 573 White, S. D. M., Frenk, C. S., 1991, ApJ, 379, 52 Worthey, G., Ottaviani, D. L., 1997, ApJS, 111, 377
astro-ph/0007295	1	0007	2000-07-19T23:17:27	Hierarchical galaxy formation and substructure in the Galaxy's stellar halo	[ "astro-ph" ]	We develop an explicit model for the formation of the stellar halo from tidally disrupted, accreted dwarf satellites in the cold dark matter (CDM) framework, focusing on predictions testable with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and other wide-field surveys. Subhalo accretion and orbital evolution are calculated using a semi-analytic approach within the Press-Schechter formalism. Motivated by our previous work, we assume that low-mass subhalos (v < 30 km/s) can form significant populations of stars only if they accreted a substantial fraction of their mass before the epoch of reionization. With this assumption, the model reproduces the observed velocity function of galactic satellites in the Local Group, solving the ``dwarf satellite problem'' without modifying the popular LCDM cosmology. The disrupted satellites yield a stellar distribution with a total mass and radial density profile consistent with those observed for the Milky Way stellar halo. Most significantly, the model predicts the presence of many large-scale, coherent substructures in the outer halo. These substructures are remnants of individual, tidally disrupted dwarf satellite galaxies. Substructure is more pronounced at large galactocentric radii because of the smaller number density of tidal streams and the longer orbital times. This model provides a natural explanation for the coherent structures in the outer stellar halo found in the SDSS commissioning data, and it predicts that many more such structures should be found as the survey covers more of the sky. The detection (or non-detection) and characterization of such structures could eventually test variants of the CDM scenario, especially those that aim to solve the dwarf satellite problem by enhancing satellite disruption.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astrophysical Journal, submitted Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 04/03/99 0 0 0 2 l u J 9 1 1 v 5 9 2 7 0 0 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a HIERARCHICAL GALAXY FORMATION AND SUBSTRUCTURE IN THE GALAXY'S STELLAR HALO James S. Bullock1, Andrey V. Kravtsov2 and David H. Weinberg Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 W. 18th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210-1173 Astrophysical Journal, submitted ABSTRACT We develop an explicit model for the formation of the stellar halo from tidally disrupted, accreted dwarf satellites in the cold dark matter (CDM) framework, focusing on predictions testable with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and other wide-field surveys. Subhalo accretion and orbital evolution are calculated using a semi-analytic approach based on the extended Press-Schechter formalism. Moti- vated by our previous work, we assume that low-mass subhalos (vc < 30 km s−1) can form significant populations of stars only if they accreted a substantial fraction of their mass before the epoch of reioniza- tion. With this assumption, the model reproduces the observed velocity function of galactic satellites in the Local Group, solving the "dwarf satellite problem" without modifying the basic tenets of the popular Λ+CDM cosmological scenario. The tidally disrupted satellites in this model yield a stellar distribution whose total mass and radial density profile are consistent with those observed for the Milky Way stellar halo. Most significantly, the model predicts the presence of many large-scale, coherent substructures in the outer halo. These substructures are remnants of individual, tidally disrupted dwarf satellite galaxies. Substructure is more pronounced at large galactocentric radii because of the smaller number density of tidal streams and the longer orbital times. This model provides a natural explanation for the coherent structures in the outer stellar halo found in the SDSS commissioning data, and it predicts that many more such structures should be found as the survey covers more of the sky. The detection (or non- detection) and characterization of such structures could eventually test variants of the CDM scenario, especially those that aim to solve the dwarf satellite problem by enhancing satellite disruption. Subject headings: cosmology: theory – galaxies:formation 1. INTRODUCTION The origin of the Milky Way's stellar halo is a long- standing astronomical problem. The poles of the debate are defined by the monolithic collapse model of Eggen, Lynden-Bell, & Sandage (1962) and the chaotic accre- tion model of Searle (1977) and Searle & Zinn (1978). The Searle & Zinn picture has gained currency in recent years in part because of growing recognition that the halo and bulge are distinct components that may have differ- ent formation mechanisms (see, e.g., the reviews by Wyse 1999ab) and in part because of "smoking gun" evidence that includes the tidally distorted Sagittarius dwarf galaxy (Ibata et al. 2000a and references therein) and the pres- ence of extra-tidal stars around many dwarf spheroidal satellites (Gould et al. 1992; Irwin & Hatzidimitriou 1995; Kuhn, Smith & Hawley 1996). The Searle & Zinn scenario also bears a strong anecdotal resemblance to the hierarchi- cal galaxy formation scenario characteristic of inflationary cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological models. In this pa- per, we make the connection between CDM cosmology and hierarchical stellar halo formation much more explicit, by presenting a simple but quantitative model for halo for- mation in the CDM framework and obtaining predictions for the degree of residual substructure in the outer halo. Previous studies of stellar halo formation in the hierar- chical framework have focused on the fossil evidence for satellite disruption preserved in phase space substructure 1james,andrey,[email protected] 2Hubble Fellow 1 of the halo stars (e.g., Johnston, Spergel & Hernquist 1995; Helmi & White 1999). These studies were aimed primarily at exploiting surveys of the halo in the solar neighborhood (e.g., Arnold & Gilmore 1992; Preston, Beers & Shect- man 1994; Majewski, Munn & Hawley 1994, 1996). Wide- angle, deep, multi-color surveys, such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), open up new avenues for studying the structure of the stellar halo. RR Lyrae stars, detected by their variability and color, can provide a three-dimensional map of the distribution of halo stars. The more general population of A-colored halo stars can be used for the same purpose; relative to RR Lyrae they have the advantages of greater numbers and detectability in a single observation epoch but the disadvantage of being less precise standard candles. Studies of RR Lyrae stars and A-colored stars in SDSS commissioning data have already revealed two large substructures in the outer halo (Ivezi´c et al. 2000; Yanny et al. 2000). The photometric depth of the SDSS and the intrinsic brightness of RR Lyrae and A stars allows a probe of halo structure out to large dis- tances, ∼ 75 kpc, and the restricted absolute-magnitude range of RR Lyrae and A stars prevents 3-dimensional substructure from being washed out by projection. Car- bon star surveys (e.g., Ibata et al. 2000a) and surveys of giant stars (Majewski et al. 2000) offer similar prospects. The model presented in this paper is an extension of our previous work aimed at explaining the observed abun- 2 BULLOCK, KRAVTSOV, & WEINBERG dance of dwarf satellite galaxies in the Local Group within the CDM framework (Bullock, Kravtsov & Weinberg 2000; hereafter BKW). In BKW we showed that the observed shape and amplitude of the velocity function of dwarf satellite galaxies in the Local Group can be explained if gas accretion and star formation are suppressed in low-mass dark matter clumps after intergalactic gas is reheated dur- ing the epoch of reionization. In this picture, the observed dwarf satellites around our Galaxy are those that assem- bled a large fraction of their mass before reionization and survived the decay of their orbit as a result of dynamical friction and avoided tidal disruption by the Milky Way potential. As shown in Fig. 1 of BKW, the number of tidally disrupted objects is similar to the number of sur- viving dwarf satellites. Here we show that the disrupted satellites produce a population of stars whose total mass and radial profile are consistent with observations of the Milky Way's stellar halo. In the outer halo, where the number of contributing satellites is relatively small and the orbital times are long, the model predicts substantial substructure, which should be detectable with the SDSS and other deep, wide-angle surveys. Our model is simple and is unlikely to be accurate in full quantitative detail. However, the qualitative predictions should be characteristic of conventional CDM cosmologies combined with straightforward assumptions about the star formation in low-mass dark matter potential wells. If the observed stellar halo is found to be radically different from these predictions, it will mean that either our star forma- tion assumptions or the CDM predictions for hierarchical small-scale structure in the dark matter distribution are incorrect. In this sense, studies of the stellar distribution in the outer halo can play a valuable role in testing more general ideas about galaxy formation. For convenience, we will focus on predictions for the RR Lyrae distribution. RR Lyrae are especially useful probes of the stellar halo because they are relatively easy to iden- tify, they are luminous enough to be detected out to large distances (r ∼ 100 kpc), and they are nearly standard can- dles and therefore yield 3-dimensional maps. RR Lyrae are believed to be good tracers of the more general halo stellar distribution, and they have often been used in kine- matic studies of the halo (Hawkins 1984). Finally, while RR Lyrae are numerous enough to trace halo substructure, they are rare enough that we can construct numerical real- izations that contain every individual RR Lyrae star. The stellar density fluctuations predicted by our model are far in excess of Poisson fluctuations, so it is straightforward to scale our predictions to other halo tracers like blue hor- izontal branch stars or carbon stars, just by putting in appropriate stellar population weights. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In § 2 we will describe our model and assumptions. Specifi- cally, we will describe our semi-analytic method for follow- ing the accretion and orbital evolution of satellite galaxies in § 2.1 and our modeling of stellar debris of disrupted satellites in § 2.2. We present our results in § 3. We finish with discussion and conclusions in § 4. 2. METHOD 2.1. Accretion and orbital evolution of satellites We use a semi-analytic method to trace the accretion history and orbital evolution of satellite galaxies within a typical Milky Way-size dark halo.3 Detailed description of the model is given in BKW. Here, we briefly review its essential aspects. The model uses the extended Press- Schechter formalism (Bond et al. 1991; Lacey & Cole 1993) to construct the accretion history for each galactic halo. The mass of a halo in this formalism is accumulated via accretion of individual subhalos of different masses, and we keep track of all the accreted subhalos down to some minimum mass. The second part of our model is a semi- analytic prescription for orbital evolution of the accreted subhalos. This prescription is used to determine whether a subhalo survives to the present day, is tidally disrupted, or is dragged into the central galaxy by dynamical fric- tion. Only subhalos that accreted a significant fraction ( > ∼0.2 − 0.3) of their mass before intergalactic gas was re- heated during the epoch of reionization are assumed to host luminous galaxies. In the model presented in this pa- per, the stellar halo of Milky Way-like galaxies is formed from the debris of those subhalos that once hosted lumi- nous galaxies but were tidally disrupted before the present day. For our analysis, we adopt a flat CDM model with a non-zero vacuum energy and the following parameters: Ωm = 0.3, ΩΛ = 0.7, h = 0.7, σ8 = 1.0, where σ8 is the rms fluctuation on the scale of 8h−1 Mpc, h is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km s−1Mpc−1, and Ωm and ΩΛ are the density contributions of matter and the vacuum respectively in units of the critical density. We assume that the density profile of each dark matter halo is described by the NFW profile (Navarro, Frenk, & White 1997): ρNFW(x) ∝ x−1(1 + x)−2, where x = r/rs, and rs is a characteristic inner radius. Given a halo of mass Mvir at redshift z, the model of Bullock et al. (2000a) supplies the typical rs value and specifies the profile com- pletely. The circular velocity curve, v2(r) ≡ GM (r)/r, peaks at a value vm at a radius rm ≃ 2.16rs. We use the merger tree method of Somerville & Kolatt (1999) to construct mass growth and halo accretion his- tories for an ensemble of galaxy-sized dark matter halos. We start with halos of mass Mvir = 1.1 × 1012 h−1M⊙, at z = 0, and trace subhalo accretion histories back to z = 10. We record the mass growth for the primary halo, Mvir(z), as well as the mass of each accreted subhalo, Ma, and the time of its accretion, ta (or za). We assign the subhalo vm according to the mass-velocity relation at the epoch of accretion. For the results presented below, we use 100 ensembles of formation histories for galactic host halos. We obtain very similar results if this number is increased. Each subhalo is assigned an initial orbital circularity, ǫ, defined as the ratio of the angular momentum of the subhalo to that of a circular orbit with the same energy, ǫ ≡ J/Jc. We choose ǫ randomly in the range 0.1 − 1.0 (Ghigna et al. 1998). To determine whether the accreted halo's orbit will decay, we use Chandrasekhar's formula to calculate the decay time, τ c DF , of the orbit's circular radius 3In this paper, the term "halo" sometimes refers to a dark matter halo and sometimes to a stellar halo. Usually the meaning is clear from context, but we will specify "dark" or "stellar" where necessary. The term "subhalo" always refers to a dark matter halo, one that is accreted into a larger dark matter halo before redshift zero. HIERARCHICAL GALAXY FORMATION AND SUBSTRUCTURE IN THE STELLAR HALO 3 rc - the radius of a circular orbit with the same energy as the actual orbit. Each subhalo is assumed to start at a randomly assigned radius ra c = (0.4 − 0.75)Rvir(ta), where Rvir(ta) is the virial radius of the host halo at the time of accretion. We determined this distribution of circular radii by measuring the range of binding energies of subhalos in the ART simulations used by Klypin et al (1999a). Once τ c DF is known, the decay time for the given circularity is τDF = τ c DF ǫ0.4 (Colpi et al. 1999). If τDF is smaller than the time left between accretion and z = 0, τDF ≤ t0 − ta, then the subhalo will merge with the central object. In our modeling of the stellar halo, we do not consider the contri- bution due to galaxies that subsequently merge with the central object. Due to the rapid decay of the orbits, any debris associated with these objects will likely remained confined within the radius where stripping first becomes important, typically r ∼< 10 kpc. For this reason, we con- sider the predictions for the stellar distribution only for galactocentric radii r > 10 kpc. If τDF is too long for the orbit to have decayed com- pletely (τDF > t0 − ta), we check whether the subhalo would have been tidally disrupted. We assume that the halo is disrupted if the tidal radius becomes smaller than rm. The tidal radius, rt, is determined at the pericenter of the orbit at z = 0, where the tides are the strongest, fol- lowing Klypin et al. (1999b). If rt ≤ rmax we declare the subhalo to be tidally destroyed and record its mass and orbital parameters so that we may model the evolution of its tidal debris (§2.2). The resulting average mass functions for all accreted ha- los and the subset of the halos that were tidally disrupted are shown in Figure 1 with the thin dashed and solid lines, respectively. The error bars represent the run-to-run dis- persion over 100 realizations. For comparison, the dotted line corresponds to halos that were dragged to the halo center as a result of dynamical friction. As expected, the dynamical friction is more efficient for massive subhalos. The mass function of surviving subhalos is similar to that of the disrupted halos, but we omit it here to preserve visual clarity. As in BKW, we assume that of all subhalos with vm < 30 km s−1 only those that accreted a fraction f of their gas before the redshift of reionization, zre, host luminous galaxies. Although our results are consistent with the ob- served abundance of dwarf satellites for a range of values of f and zre, here we use the fiducial values of BKW, f = 0.3 and zre = 8. We expect that our results for disrupted satel- lites would be similar if we chose other f , zre combinations that also match the observed (surviving) dwarf satellite population. For a given subhalo of mass Ma and accretion redshift za, we use equation (2.26) of LC93 to probabilisti- cally assign the redshift, zf , at which the main progenitor of the subhalo reached mass Mf = f Ma for the first time. The subhalo hosts a luminous galaxy only if zf ≥ zre. We also assume that subhalos with vm < vl = 10 km s−1 do not host galaxies, since any gas that was initially accreted in these small systems would be unable to cool, and it should quickly boil out of the halo after reionization (e.g., Barkana & Loeb 1999). Our results do not change if we vary vl by 50%. The thick solid line in Figure 1 shows the average mass function of disrupted halos that once hosted luminous galaxies. The mass function of the surviving galaxies is similar to that of the disrupted galaxies, but Fig. 1.- Cumulative mass function of all accreted dark matter subhalos (dashed line), the fraction that decayed due to dynamical friction (dotted line), tidally disrupted halos (thin solid line), and the fraction of disrupted halos that host galax- ies (thick solid line). Not shown is the mass function of sur- viving halos, which is similar to that of disrupted halos, and the mass function of surviving galaxies, which is roughly half that of the disrupted galaxies (reflecting the tendency for sur- viving halos to have been accreted later). The mass function represents the average over 100 merger histories for host halos of mass Mvir(z = 0) = 1.1 × 1012h−1 M⊙. The errorbars show the dispersion over the different merger histories. lower in amplitude by about a factor of two. Surviving halos are typically accreted later than tidally destroyed halos, and they are less likely to form before reionization and host a galaxy. 2.2. Modeling stellar tidal debris Estimating the number of tidally stripped stars, and RR Lyrae stars in particular, requires several uncertain assumptions about gas cooling, star formation, and stel- lar population morphology. The following approximations are extremely simplified, and the estimated number of dis- rupted stars for each object is uncertain at the factor of 2 − 3 level. This uncertainty is passed on to the overall amplitude of calculated stellar density distribution in the halo. Nevertheless, our statistical measures of substruc- ture depend only on the ratio to the background density, and they are thus largely insensitive to the precise values we assume. Furthermore, we adopt the same assumptions that we used in BKW to obtain consistency with the ob- served dwarf satellite population, and this matching nor- malizes out some of the uncertainties in the overall stellar halo amplitude. We estimate the luminosity of every disrupted luminous galaxy assuming that it has a baryonic mass f Ma(Ωb/Ωm) (the mass of baryons accreted at z > zre). We assume that a fraction ǫ∗ of this baryonic mass is converted to a stel- 4 BULLOCK, KRAVTSOV, & WEINBERG lar population with mass-to-light ratio M∗/LV . The total mass to light ratio of the subhalo is thus (cid:18) Mvir LV (cid:19) = f −1(cid:18) Ωm Ωb (cid:19)(cid:18) M∗ LV (cid:19) ǫ−1 ∗ . (1) Adopting M∗/LV ≃ 0.7, typical for galactic disk stars (e.g., Binney & Merrifield 1998), Ωm/Ωb ≃ 7 (based on Ωm = 0.3, h = 0.7, and Ωbh2 ≃ 0.02 from Burles & Tytler 1998), and ǫ∗ = 0.5, we obtain (M/LV ) ≃ 10f −1 ≃ 33. We estimate the number of horizontal branch stars in each galaxy using NHB = LV /(540L⊙) (Preston, Shectman, & Beers 1991). The fraction of the horizontal branch stars that are RR Lyrae variables is strongly dependent on the metallicities and ages of the populations, and it will vary significantly from one object to another. For simplicity, we assume that all disrupted objects have NRR = 0.3NHB. This fraction is high compared to local halo stars, but it is consistent with fractions observed for more distant (r ∼> 10 kpc) globular clusters, likely reflecting the ten- dency for the outer halo to be younger (Preston et al. 1991; Brocato et al. 1996; Layden 1998). For each disrupted luminous subhalo, we randomly as- sign a direction for its angular momentum vector. This direction fixes the plane of the orbit since we assume that the dark halo potential is spherical (i.e., no orbital preces- sion). We follow the orbit from the time it was accreted at ta to t0 using dr dt dψ dt = ±v(rc)s 2 v2(rc) [Φ(re) − Φ(r)] + 1 − ǫ2r2 c r2 , = v(rc)rcǫ r2 , (2) (3) where r is the distance to the galactic center, ψ is the an- gle in the orbital plane, Φ(r) = −4.6v2 m ln(1 + x)/x is the potential of the host, and the ± sign signifies whether the object is approaching its apocenter or pericenter, respec- tively. We will work in the approximation that the dynam- ical friction timescale is long compared to the time remain- ing for the orbital evolution and disruption: τDF ≫ t0−ta. This is a good approximation for ∼ 90% of the disrupted halos - not surprisingly, since we have deliberately re- stricted our analysis to halos whose orbits have not de- cayed (i.e., long τDF ). In order to approximately account for cases where this approximation breaks down, we start integrating the satellite orbit at t = ta but set its starting radius equal to the circular radius it will have decayed to by t = t0: r(ta) = rc(t0) ≡ rc. The initial value for the angle, ψ(ta), is chosen randomly, and we assume that the satellite is initially infalling (approaching the pericenter). We assume that the satellite is tidally disrupted after the first passage of its orbit pericenter. At this time, the tidal debris will obtain an energy distribution from the en- counter. Our model for the evolution of the debris along the tidal tail is motivated by numerical results of Johnston (1998), who showed that the following approximations pro- vide good description of the positions of stripped particles in her simulations. The typical energy scale of the debris is set by the change in the host halo potential energy over the size of the tidally disrupted object, ε = rt dΦ dr ≃ v2 m(cid:18) rt rp(cid:19) , (4) where rp is the pericenter radius of the orbit. The last ap- proximation is exactly true for a logarithmic potential (a singular isothermal density profile). We assume that the satellite is completely disrupted after the first passage, and that the energy of the debris is evenly distributed over the energy range −ε > dE > ε (Evans & Kochanek 1989). This assumption ignores the possibility of disruption over several orbits, but we find that our results are robust to the choice of distribution and do not change significantly if the energy range is altered by 50%. Using intuition gained from a circular orbit within a singular isothermal density background, we may estimate how a change in en- ergy from E to E + dE affects the orbit of a particle. In this approximation, the azimuthal period, Tψ, and radial period, Tr, depend only on the orbit energy, and they are both increased or decreased depending on the sign of the deposited energy: Tψ,r(E + dE) = τ Tψ,r(E), where τ = exp(cid:18) dE m(cid:19) . v2 (5) This result allows us to map the orbital trajectory of the initial object with energy E (Eqs. 4 and 5) to that of a debris particle with energy E + dE via [r(t),ψ(t)] → [r(t/τ ),ψ(t/τ )]. For each RR Lyrae star in the disrupted galaxy, we as- sign a change in energy dE and integrate the orbital equa- tions to determine its position at z = 0. Since the dis- rupted galaxy will have some finite spherical extent, we add a random offset to this calculated central orbit posi- tion. The magnitude of this offset is a Gaussian deviate with dispersion 2 kpc, the typical optical radius for a dwarf galaxy (Mateo 1998), and the direction is random. 3. RESULTS Figures 2 and 3 show two realizations of the RR Lyrae distribution from disrupted satellites in sky-projected galactic coordinates. The panels in each figure corre- spond to the indicated radial bins in galacto-centric ra- dius. Qualitatively, it is clear that substructures become more pronounced at larger radii. This radial trend re- flects the smaller number of disrupted satellites with large apocenters and the longer periods of their orbits, which reduces the extent of debris spreading along the orbit. A comparison of the maps in Figures 2 and 3 illustrates the differences between different merger histories of the host halo. One can see that the stochastic variations in merger history at fixed host mass lead to substantial variations in the appearance and abundance of substructures. In light of the SDSS results referred to in § 1, the most interesting predictions of the model are the radial number density profile of halo stars and the clumpiness and spa- tial extent of the stellar distribution. Figure 4 shows radial number density profiles of the halo RR Lyrae stars. The long dashed lines in each panel represent the power law (n∗ ∝ r−3) RR Lyrae density profile derived by Wetterer & McGraw (1996), based on their large compilation of RR Lyrae. The solid points show the profile computed HIERARCHICAL GALAXY FORMATION AND SUBSTRUCTURE IN THE STELLAR HALO 5 Fig. 2.- Distribution of stripped stars in various radial bins projected on the sky. Each point represents an RR Lyrae star, and the number of stars in each radial bin, starting in the upper left panel, is 11331, 9052, 8237, 7182, 6173, and 5076. These views are centered on the Galactic Center, but shifting to a solar origin makes no qualitative difference. 6 BULLOCK, KRAVTSOV, & WEINBERG Fig. 3.- Same as Figure 2, but for a different merger history realization. Each point represents an RR Lyrae, and the number of stars in each radial bin, starting in the the upper left panel, is 6511, 6402, 4962, 4363. 2783, and 2077. HIERARCHICAL GALAXY FORMATION AND SUBSTRUCTURE IN THE STELLAR HALO 7 Fig. 4.- The average RR Lyrae density profile (thick solid line) compared with the Ivezi´c et al. (2000) SDSS data (solid points) and the power law determined by Wetterer & Mc- Graw (1996) (dashed line). In the upper left panel, the error bars reflect the dispersion in the average from realization to realization. The thin solid lines in the other three panels are results of random strips similar in solid angle and geometry to the strips used to obtain the SDSS measurements (∼ 1 degree wide, 100 square degree strip). by Ivezi´c et al. (2000) for their sample of RR Lyrae can- didates obtained from SDSS commissioning data, which covers roughly a one-degree wide, 100 square degree strip of sky. Note that the SDSS and Wetterer & McGraw pro- ∼35 kpc. At larger radii, however, the files agree well at < SDSS sample shows two significant deviations from the smooth n∗ ∝ r−3 profile: a "bump" in number density ∼50 kpc. As noted at r ≈ 40 kpc and a sharp drop at r > by Ivezi´c et al., this structure in the radial profile likely indicates significant clumpiness of the stellar halo at these galactocentric radii, and the bump in particular is asso- ciated with an identifiable coherent structure containing ∼ 70 RR Lyrae within the observed region. The model predictions are shown in Figure 4 by thick and thin solid lines. The thick solid lines represent the computed RR Lyrae number density profile averaged over all merging history realizations and the full sky. The error bars in the upper left panel show the dispersion from real- ization to realization around this average, demonstrating that stochastic variations in merger histories lead to a fac- tor of ∼ 2 rms variation in the overall normalization of the predicted halo density profile. In the remaining three pan- els, the thin solid lines show examples of density profiles derived from a single host halo realization, viewed through three randomly chosen strips similar in solid angle and ge- ometry to the strips used to derive the SDSS sample. Fig. 5.- The radial distributions of disrupted RR Lyrae stars in 1 degree wide, great circle slices through a single model halo realization. This halo formed from about 60 disrupted satellites. Shown are four random cuts of great circle planes through the halo center. Each point represents a single RR Lyrae star. Concentric circles indicate galactocentric radii of 25, 50, and 75 kpc. Note that apparent "clumpiness" of the stellar distribution increases with increasing radius. The first remarkable feature of Figure 4 is the agreement of the predicted average profile with the slope and ampli- tude found by Wetterer & McGraw (1996). As discussed in §2.2, the predicted amplitude is uncertain by a factor of several, and even the statistical fluctuations from one galaxy to another are significant, so the degree of agree- ment must be somewhat fortuitous. However, it is worth noting that we did not adjust any parameters to fit the ob- served halo profile but chose "best guess" values based on other considerations - in particular, the requirement of matching the observed dwarf satellite population. Figure 4 suggests that disruption of accreted satellites can produce not just substructure in the stellar halo but the entire stel- lar halo itself. If we have overestimated the number of RR Lyrae per unit dark matter mass, then there is room for another physical mechanism that creates a smooth under- lying halo, but it seems that no such additional mechanism is necessary. The second remarkable feature of Figure 4 is the jagged- ness of the observed and predicted profiles of individ- ual strips, which becomes especially pronounced at radii r ∼> 40 kpc. These large fluctuations reflect the substruc- ture visible in Figures 2 and 3. The steep drop in the SDSS counts between 60 and 70 kpc suggests detection of an "edge" of the stellar halo (Ivezic et al. 2000). However, the second of our numerical realizations shows an equally sharp edge, even though the average halo profile is smooth. Our model predicts a gradual steepening of the halo profile at r ∼> 60 kpc, but although surveys in small solid angles should show large count fluctuations, the profile averaged 8 BULLOCK, KRAVTSOV, & WEINBERG radii. Fig. 6.- Same as Figure 5, but for a different merger his- tory realization of the host halo. The host in this realization accreted about 20 luminous satellites over its history. over the full sky should not cut off sharply. Figures 5 and 6 present a different view of the structure associated with disrupted satellites, in a form more com- parable to the plots of Yanny et al. (2000). Each figure shows a one degree wide, randomly oriented, great circle slice through a realization of the RR Lyrae distribution. The two figures show stellar halos for different Monte Carlo accretion histories, one with a total of about 60 tidally de- stroyed galaxies (Figure 5) and one with a more quiescent accretion history and about 20 tidally destroyed galax- ies (Figure 6). This range roughly covers the scatter in the number of disruption events expected from galaxy to galaxy. The three concentric circles indicate galactocen- tric radii of 25, 50, and 75 kpc. In both figures, structures associated with the individual disrupted objects become more easily identifiable at larger radii. To make our predictions more quantitative, we present two simple statistical measures of the halo clumpiness. Figure 7 shows the probability distribution of model RR Lyrae counts in solid angle cells of different sizes and for different ranges of galactocentric radii. The cells are roughly square on the sky; they are defined by dividing the sky map for each realization into patches of a given size. In order to take out the uncertainty in the overall amplitude of the density distribution, and to factor out the variation in the overall amplitude from one halo real- ization to another, the counts are presented in units of the average expected number, hNi, of RR Lyrae in patches of the chosen size for each realization. Figure 7 shows that the amplitude of patch-to-patch count fluctuations is higher for smaller solid angles and for larger galactocentric Fig. 7.- Probability distribution of simulated RR Lyrae counts in solid angle cells for various radial ranges. Here, N/hN i is the measured number of stars within the given ra- dial bin and solid angle cell divided by the average number for a cell of that size. The cells are roughly square in angle size and were defined by dividing the sky of each realization into patches of the indicated size, with the observer at the cen- ter of the halo. The spikes at small N/hN i represent empty cells. Note that higher amplitude fluctuations from patch to patch are more likely for smaller patch areas and for larger galactocentric radii. Figure 8 shows the rms dispersion in RR Lyrae counts, σ(N/hNi), as a function of galactocentric radius for cells of different solid angle and geometry. The solid points/line show counts in square cells, while open points represent the counts in one degree wide strips. The error bars for the solid points show the standard deviation of the dispersion for different merger history realizations; the error bars are similar for the open points. These error bars reinforce the point made in our illustrative figures above, namely that the degree of surviving substructure is quite variable from one realization of the stellar halo to another.The dashed lines show the expected amplitude of Poisson fluctuations based on the average number of stars expected within the given solid angle and radial bin. Note that the predicted fluctuations are always larger than Poisson fluctuations, especially at large radii, because they are dominated by fluctuations in the number of debris streams rather than √N fluctuations in the number of RR Lyrae. Again, the fluctuations are larger for cells of smaller solid angle and for larger radii. They are also larger for square patches than for narrow strips of the same solid angle, reflecting the fact that a narrow strip is less likely to enclose an entire disrupted object and instead encloses fragments of multiple debris streams. HIERARCHICAL GALAXY FORMATION AND SUBSTRUCTURE IN THE STELLAR HALO 9 erage predicted profile falls off more steeply at r ∼> 50 kpc, but it does not have a sharp outer boundary. The amplitude of the mean profile depends on several uncertain factors, such as the mean stellar luminosity to dark mass ratio of the disrupted dwarfs and the mean num- ber of RR Lyrae per solar luminosity. There are also sig- nificant (factor of two) statistical fluctuations in the ampli- tude from one realization to another. The amplitude of the predicted RR Lyrae profile is therefore uncertain by a fac- tor of a few. Nonetheless, with "best guess" parameter val- ues chosen on the basis of other considerations, the mean RR Lyrae profile agrees very well with that determined by Wetterer & McGraw (1996), in slope and amplitude. It therefore appears that disruption of dwarf satellites is a plausible mechanism for producing the entire stellar halo within the CDM framework, though it could also co-exist with some other mechanism. The uncertainty in our pre- dicted normalization is reduced by the fact that we require the model to self-consistently reproduce the velocity func- tion of observed dwarf satellites, a point that we will return to shortly. The main qualitative prediction of the model is the pres- ∼30 ence of significant clumpiness in the outer regions ( > kpc) of the Galaxy's stellar halo. This clumpiness is due to the surviving tidal debris of dozens of satellite galax- ies disrupted during evolution of their host. In the inner ∼30 kpc), the density distri- regions of the stellar halo (r < bution is relatively smooth. At larger radii, however, the clumpiness of the stellar halo manifests itself when viewed through fixed solid angle patches in the sky. For typical modeled stellar halos, RR Lyrae profiles of the type ob- served by Ivezi´c et al. (2000) in the SDSS commissioning data (with a coherent structure at r ∼ 50 kpc) are not uncommon. We have quantified our predictions by presenting some statistical measures of the "clumpiness" in our modeled stellar halos. First, we measured the probability distribu- tion (see Fig. 7) of RR Lyrae counts, N/hNi, in solid angle cells of different sizes and for different galactocentric ra- dial bins (here hNi is the average number of stars expected in a cell). We also presented the rms width of this prob- ability distribution as a function of galactocentric radius for solid angle cells of different geometries (Fig. 8). These statistics show that the variance in the stellar counts (i.e., clumpiness of the stellar halo) increases with increasing galactocentric radius and decreasing solid angle. Although current observational data sets are not sufficiently large to derive similar statistics for comparison, future samples of RR Lyrae and A-stars from the SDSS and 2dF surveys should make such comparisons possible. For cell sizes of 36 deg2 or larger, predicted fluctuations in RR Lyrae counts are much larger than Poisson fluctuations, at all galacto- centric radii considered. These quantitative predictions depend on some of the model assumptions. For instance, one of the implicit as- sumptions in our analysis is that the dark matter distri- bution in the host halo is nearly spherically symmetric. In particular, we do not include the possible precession of satellite orbits. In the case of the significantly oblate halo, such precession can erase signatures of the tidal tails (at least in configuration space), so it would reduce the Fig. 8.- Fractional rms fluctuation of stellar counts as a function of radius for sky patches of different solid angle. The solid points are for a roughly square angular patch geometry, and the open points correspond to one degree wide strips. The error bars represent the dispersion in the rms fluctuation from realization to realization for an ensemble of merger histories. The dashed lines show the expected Poisson uncertainty based on the average number of RR Lyrae expected within the given solid angle and radial bin. 4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We have presented a model in which stellar halos of Milky Way type galaxies are built via the accretion and tidal disruption of satellite galaxies. The model is based on the CDM structure formation scenario, with the crucial assumption that only a fraction of dark matter halos with ∼30km s−1 are luminous and host a siz- circular velocities < able stellar system4. These luminous halos are those that collapsed and accreted a substantial fraction of their mass prior to the epoch of reionization, zre. Only the accretion and tidal disruption of luminous dwarf galaxies contribute to the build up of the stellar halo in our model. The model predicts an average density profile for the stellar halo of n∗ ∝ r−α, with α ∼ 3 in the range r ≃ 10 − 50 kpc, in good agreement with observations. The density profiles of individual realizations of the host halo merger histories, however, exhibit a substantial scat- ter around this average, with the power law varying from α ∼ 2.5 − 3.5. The reason why the stellar halo density profile is steeper than that of the dark matter (αDM ∼ 2, which is indeed typical of that of the surviving subhalos in our model), is that central satellites are more likely to be destroyed than those at large radii, since satellites far from the galactic center must have extremely eccentric orbits in order to pass close enough to be tidally destroyed. The av- 4All DM halos with circular velocities > 30km s−1 are assumed to host a luminous galaxy. 10 BULLOCK, KRAVTSOV, & WEINBERG predicted clumpiness of the outer halo (e.g., Ibata et al. 2000a). However, the observed narrowness of the tidal tail of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy implies a nearly spherical ∼60 kpc (Ibata et al. 2000a). A nearly halo potential at r < spherical mass distribution in the inner region of a galaxy- mass halo is consistent with predictions of CDM models (Bullock et al. 2000b). We have also neglected the effects of the disk component on the background potential. In- cluding this non-spherical central component would induce precession in the tidal orbits (Helmi & White 1999) and smear out residual structure at small galactic radii. But since this effect would only be important in the central regions (r < ∼20 kpc), the net effect would be to strengthen the trend of increased variance in star counts with radius. The assumption that affects our predictions the most, however, is that only a small fraction of disrupted subhalos host a stellar system and thereby contribute to the build up of the stellar halo. In other words, the predicted prop- erties of the stellar halo depend crucially on the way that we have solved the dwarf satellite problem. This prob- lem, namely that the predicted number of dark halos with ∼30 km s−1 is much larger than the ob- circular velocities < served number of dwarf satellites within the virialized dark halos of the Milky Way and M31 (Kauffmann et al. 1993; Klypin et al. 1999a; Moore et al. 1999), is one of the few outstanding problems of the conventional inflationary CDM model, which, with the inclusion of a cosmological constant, accounts well for a wide variety of other obser- vational data. Other proposed solutions to the dwarf satellite problem include modifying the inflationary fluctuation spectrum (Kamionkowski & Liddle 2000) or modifying the proper- ties of dark matter by making it warm (WDM; e.g., Hogan & Dalcanton 2000) or self-interacting (SIDM; e.g., Spergel & Steinhardt 2000). In the SIDM model, halos collapse and accrete mass in a similar manner to conventional CDM halos. However, the number of surviving subhalos within a Milky Way mass halo is reduced because lower concen- tration of the SIDM halos makes them easier to disrupt and because interactions lead to "ram pressure" stripping of the dark halos. Relative to our reionization solution, the SIDM solution seems to predict a more massive and more extended stellar halo built from a larger number of tidal streams, since the abundance of dwarf satellites is re- duced by a higher efficiency of satellite disruption rather than suppression of star formation in low-mass systems. Indeed, the SIDM model seems at some risk of overpro- ducing the stellar halo. However, if the predicted stellar halo were normalized to the mean stellar density of the ob- served one, the SIDM model would probably predict less substructure than the model presented here because of the higher density of independent tidal streams. The predictions of WDM and broken scale-invariance models are less clear, since they can reduce dwarf satel- lite numbers both by suppressing their formation in the first place (White & Croft 2000) and by making them less concentrated and therefore easier to disrupt (Col´ın et al. 2000). If the second effect dominates, the predic- tions might be closer to those of SIDM; if the first effect dominates, they might be closer to those of the reioniza- tion model. At present, we lack quantitative predictions on this matter from SIDM and WDM, and we lack detailed observational constraints, so we cannot draw conclusions about which model fares best. However, it appears that studies of the mass, radial profile, and substructure of the stellar halo might provide useful constraints on these mod- els in the near future. It is interesting that all of the substructures detected in the nearly all-sky Carbon star survey and the SDSS com- missioning data could be produced by a single tidal stream of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy (Ibata et al. 2000b). In particular, the observed excess in the RR Lyrae number density profile at r ≈ 45 kpc is caused by a clump of stars near the apocenter of the Sagittarius orbit. If most of the RR Lyrae in the surveyed strip belong to the Sagittarius stream, then no stars are expected beyond the apocenter of the Sagittarius orbit, and this would naturally explain ∼60 kpc de- the drop in the RR Lyrae number density at r > tected in the SDSS data. However, the presence of only a single stream in a large volume of sky would be both puz- zling and intriguing, since the CDM models considered in this paper predict at least ∼ 20 (and typically more) tidal streams in the halo of a Milky Way-size galaxy. The SIDM and WDM stellar halos should be built from even larger number of tidal streams. Carbon stars are relatively young and rare, and therefore older tidal streams may not be re- vealed by their distribution. We predict, however, that many more substructures not associated with the Sagit- tarius tidal stream should be detected in the future as the SDSS covers a larger area of the sky. Absence of such de- tections would spell serious trouble for CDM models, and possibly even more so for the variants of CDM that we have discussed. Several past theoretical studies of tidal stripping and disruption of galactic satellites have shown that tidal streams can be used as powerful probes of both the present potential of the Milky Way (Johnston et al. 1999; Ibata et al. 2000a) and its accretion history (e.g., Helmi & White 1999; Helmi et al. 1999; Helmi & de Zeeuw 2000). For example, Johnston et al. (1999) show that parameters characterizing the mass distribution in the Milky Way halo can be determined with an accuracy of a few percent using a single tidal stream if accurate phase-space information is available for as few as 100 stream stars. Helmi et al. (1999) show how phase-space information can be used to recover fossil remnants of the satellites accreted and dis- rupted early in the Milky Way evolution. These techniques can be used to construct a detailed formation history of the Galaxy. In this study, we have focused on the spatial distribution of stars in the Milky Way halo. The radial density behav- ior of stars may not prove to be as sensitive a probe of the galactic potential as the accurate phase-space mapping of tidal streams (Johnston et al. 1999), but it should be very useful in recovering details of the Milky Way accretion history. In some respects, the number of surviving tidal streams or the degree of clumpiness of the stellar distribu- tion can provide better constraints on the variants of the CDM scenario than the abundance of galactic satellites. An advantage here is that the spatial distribution of halo stars should be possible to map in the very near future, when large samples of halo stars from the SDSS and other surveys become available. Accurate, large-scale, phase- space mapping of tidal streams, on the other hand, will become possible only after launch of the next generation astrometric space missions (i.e., at the end of the decade). HIERARCHICAL GALAXY FORMATION AND SUBSTRUCTURE IN THE STELLAR HALO 11 On the theoretical side, our model and predictions can be improved upon by combining mass accretion histories typ- ical for the galaxy-size halos formed in CDM models with more sophisticated numerical models of orbital evolution of satellites and their tidal debris. We thank Amina Helmi and Kathryn Johnston for use- ful discussion and suggestions. This work was supported in part by NASA LTSA grant NAG5-3525 and NSF grant AST-9802568. Support for A.V.K. was provided by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant HF-01121.01-99A from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astron- omy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. 12 BULLOCK, KRAVTSOV, & WEINBERG REFERENCES Arnold, R., & Gilmore, G., 1992, MNRAS, 257, 225 Barkana, R., & Loeb, A. 1999, ApJ, 523, 54 Binney, J., & Merrifield, M., 1998, Galactic Astronomy (Princeton: Princeton University Press) Johnston, K.V., Spergel, D.N. & Hernquist, L. 1995, ApJ, 451, 598 Johnston, K.V., Zhao, H., Spergel, D.N., Hernquist, L. 1999, ApJ, 512, L109 Kamionkowski, M., & Liddle, A.R. 1999, preprint (astro- Bond, J. R., Cole, S., Efstathiou, G., Kaiser, N., 1991, ApJ, 379, ph/9911103) 440 Brocato, E., Buonanno, R., Malakhova, Y., & Piersimoni, A. M., Kauffmann, G., White, S.D.M., & Guiderdoni, B. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201 1996, A&A, 311, 778 Klypin, A.A., Kravtsov, A.V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. 1999a, Bullock, J.S., Flores, R., Kolatt, T.S., Kravtsov, A.V., Klypin, A., ApJ, 522, 82 & Primack, J.R.. 2000b, in preparation. Bullock, J.S., Kolatt, T.S., Sigad, Y., Somerville, R.S., Kravtsov, A.V., Klypin, A., Primack, J.R., & Dekel, A. 2000a, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph/9908159) Bullock, J.S., Kravtsov, A.V., & Weinberg, D.H., ApJ, accepted, astro-ph/0002214, BKW Burles, S., & Tytler, D. 1998, ApJ, 507, 732 Col´ın, P. Avila-Reese, V., Valenzuela, O. 2000, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/0004115) Colpi, M., Mayer, L., & Governato, F. 1999, ApJ, 525, 720. Dav´e, R., Spergel, D.N., Steinhardt, P.J., Wandelt, B.D. 2000, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/0006218) Eggen, O.J., Lynden-Bell, D., & Sandage, A.R., 1962, ApJ, 136, 748 Evans, C. R.,& Kochanek, C. S., 1989, ApJ, 346. L13 Ghigna, S., Moore, B., Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., & Stadel, J. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 146 Gould, A., Guhathakurta, P., Richstone, D., & Flynn, C., 1992, Klypin, A.A., Gottlber, S., Kravtsov, A.V., & Khokhlov, A.M. 1999b, ApJ, 516, 530 Kuhn, J. R., Smith, H. A., & Hawley, S. L., 1996, ApJ, 469, L93 Lacey, C., & Cole, S., 1993, MNRAS, 262, 627 (LC93) Layden, A.C., 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 136, Galactic Halos, ed. D. Zaritsky, (San Fransico:ASP), 14 Majewski, S.R., Munn, J.A., & Hawley, S.L, 1994, ApJ, 427, L37 Majewski, S.R., Munn, J.A., & Hawley, S.L, 1996, ApJ, 459, L73 Majewski, S.R., Ostheimer, J.C., Patterson, R.J., Kunkel, W.E., Johnston, K.V., Geisler, D. 2000, AJ 119, 760 Mateo, M.L. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 435 Moore, B., Ghigna, F., Governato, F., Lake, G., Stadel, J., & Tozzi, P. 1999, ApJ, 524, L19 Narayanan, V.K., Spergel, D.N., Dav´e, R., Ma, C.-P. 2000, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0005095) Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M. 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 Press, W.H., & Schechter, P. 1974, ApJ, 187, 425 Preston, G.W., Schectman, S.A., & Beers, T.C., 1991, ApJ, 375, Preston, G.W., Beers, T.C., & Schectman, S.A., 1994, AJ, 108, 538 Searle, L., 1977, in The Evolution of Galaxies and Stellar Populations, ed. B.M. Tinsley & R.B. Larson (New Haven: Yale University Press),219 Searle, L. & Zinn, R., 1978, APJ, 225, 357 Somerville, R.S., & Kolatt, T.S. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 1 (SK99) Spergel, D.N., & Steinhardt, P.J. 1999, preprint (astro-ph/9909386) Wetterer, C.J., & McGraw, J.T. 1996, AJ, 112, 1046 White, M., & Croft, R.A., 2000, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0001247 Wyse, R. F. G. 1999a, in ASP Conf. Ser. 165: The Third Stromlo Symposium: The Galactic Halo, 1 Wyse, R. F. G. 1999b, in The formation of galactic bulges, ed. C.M. Carollo, H.C. Ferguson, R.F.G. Wyse, (Cambridge: Cambridge) Yanny, B., et al., 2000, ApJ, accepted, astro-ph/0004128 York, D.G., et al., 2000, AJ, accepted, astro-ph/0006396 Hawkins, M.R.S. 1984, MNRAS 206, 433 Helmi, A., & White, S.D.M. 1999, MNRAS 307, 495 Helmi, A., White, S.D.M., de Zeeuw, P.T., & Zhao, H.-S. 1999, 121. ApJ, 388, 345 Nature, 402, 53 ph/0007166 Helmi, A., & de Zeeuw, P.T. 2000, MNRAS submitted, astro- Hogan, C.J., & Dalcanton, J.J. 2000, Phys.Rev. D, in press (astro-ph/0002330) Ibata, R., Lewis, G.F., Irwin, M., Totten, E., Quinn, T. 2000a, astro-ph/0004011 Ibata, R., Irwin, M., Lewis, G.F., Stolte, A. 2000b, ApJL submitted (astro-ph/0004255) Ibata, R.A., & Razoumov A.O. 1998, A&A, 336, 130 Irwin, M., & Hatzidimitriou, D., 1995, MNRAS, 277, 1354 Ivezi´c, Z, et al., 2000, AJ, submitted, astro-ph/0004130 Johnston, K.V., 1998, ApJ, 495, 297
astro-ph/9408104	1	9408	1994-08-31T23:26:39	Matter Distribution for Power Spectra with Broken Scale Invariance	[ "astro-ph" ]	To test the primordial power spectra predicted by a double inflationary model with a break of amplitude $\Delta=3$ at a scale of $2\pi/k\approx 10 \hm$ and CDM as dominant matter content, we perform PM simulations with 128$^3$ particles on a 256$^3$ grid. The broken scale invariance of the power spectra explains the extra power observed in the large-scale matter distribution. COBE-normalized spectra and a linear biasing with $b\approx 2$ are shown to reproduce the reconstructed power spectra from the CfA catalog. Identifying galactic halos with overdensity of approximately two times the cell variance, we can fit the angular correlation function using both the Limber equation and creating a APM-like angular projection with the observed luminosity function. Finally, the higher order moments of the galaxy distribution are shown to fit reasonably well the observed values.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Matter distribution for power spectra with broken scale invariance Luca Amendola , Stefan Gottl(cid:127)ober , Jan Peter M(cid:127)ucket , Volker M(cid:127)uller ; Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma Viale del Parco Mel lini, I- Rome, Italy NASA/Fermilab Astrophysics Center PO Box Batavia IL , USA Astrophysical Institute Potsdam An der Sternwarte D- Potsdam, Germany ABSTRACT To test the primordial power spectra predicted by a double in(cid:13)ationary model with a break of amplitude (cid:1) = at a scale of (cid:25)=k (cid:25) h Mpc and CDM as (cid:0) dominant matter content, we perform PM simulations with particles on a grid. The broken scale invariance of the power spectra explains the extra power observed in the large-scale matter distribution. COBE-normalized spec- tra and a linear biasing with b (cid:25) are shown to reproduce the reconstructed power spectra from the CfA catalog. Identifying galactic halos with overdensity of approximately two times the cell variance, we can (cid:12)t the angular correlation function using both the Limber equation and creating a APM-like angular pro- jection with the observed luminosity function. Finally, the higher order moments of the galaxy distribution are shown to (cid:12)t reasonably well the observed values. Introduction In(cid:13)ationary cosmological models predict that the observable part of the universe is quasi- (cid:13)at, i.e. the total density parameter is (cid:10) (cid:25) . Combined with the density of baryons tot (cid:10) (cid:25) :h (h denotes the Hubble constant in units of km s Mpc ) following bar (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) from the theory of primordial nucleosynthesis this requires most of matter in the Universe to be nonbaryonic. The most elaborate model of structure formation assumes an universe dominated by cold dark matter (CDM) with a Harrison{Zeldovich spectrum of initial pertur- bations. With a biasing b (cid:25) it has successfully explained the observed hierarchy of cosmic g structures on scales smaller than approximately h Mpc. However, recent observations (cid:0) seem to indicate that the predictions of the standard CDM model on very large scales and on small scales are incompatible (Efstathiou et al. , Maddox et al. , Fisher et al. , Saunders et al. , Vogeley et al. ). The standard model is based on two assumptions, namely, () that the primordial per- turbation spectrum generated during in(cid:13)ation is of Harrison-Zeldovich type, and () that the dark matter, which gives the main contribution to the density of the Einstein-de Sit- ter universe, is cold. In order to change the theoretical predictions of this model, one can modify either of these assumptions. In the (cid:12)rst case, improved in(cid:13)ationary scenarios lead to other than Harrison-Zeldovich spectra. In the second case, widely discussed candidates for closing the universe are mixed dark matter or a cosmological term. In a recent paper, a change of the (cid:12)rst type has been investigated (Gottl(cid:127)ober, M(cid:127)ucket, Starobinsky ). The underlying in(cid:13)ationary model shows two consecutive stages of exponential expansion with a short intermediate stage of power law expansion (Gottl(cid:127)ober, M(cid:127)uller, Starobinsky ). The two driving mechanisms are vacuum polarisation e(cid:11)ects and a massive scalar (cid:12)eld. In this case the resulting power spectra with broken scale invariance (BSI) are of Harrison-Zeldovich type only in the limit of very small and very large scales. In the intermediate range they are steeper. The spectra are characterized by the ratio (cid:1) of the power of a Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum to the power of the BSI spectrum on small scales assuming both are normalized on large scales (COBE normalization). The scale k denotes the onset of the break in the per- br turbation spectrum at small scales, i. e. for k > k the spectrum is of Harrison-Zeldovich br type. The quantity (cid:1) mainly depends on the parameters characterising the in(cid:13)ationary stages (the mass of the scalar particle and the coupling constant of the higher-order terms), whereas k depends on the energy density of the scalar (cid:12)eld at the onset of in(cid:13)ation. The br best (cid:12)t to observations is reached with (cid:1) between and and k in the range between br (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) h Mpc and h Mpc (Gottl(cid:127)ober, M(cid:127)ucket, Starobinsky ). In the following we adopt (cid:1) = and k = :h Mpc. Starting from these spectra, we have performed N-body sim- br (cid:0) (cid:0) ulations using the particle-mesh code of Kates et al. ( ), extended to three dimensions. In this paper we report on the linear and non-linear clustering properties that characterize the matter in these simulations. In Section we begin by discussing the spatial correlation function and the power spectrum in our simulations. One of the most convincing evidence for rejecting the standard CDM model comes prob- ably from the angular correlation function (ACF). Even if the information on redshift is lost, the angular surveys provide such an enormous amount of data, millions of galaxy positions, that they turn out to tightly constrain theoretical models. As it is well known, the ACF reported by Maddox et al. ( ) is not matched by the standard CDM model; on angular scales larger than two or three degrees, the observed ACF is found indeed to be signi(cid:12)ca- tively larger than predicted by CDM, when CDM is normalized to small scales. One can say that since the publishing of the APM results the minimal requirement for any new model of galaxy formation is that the correct ACF be reproduced. In Section we report the test of our model against the observed ACF. As we already stated, to match the correlation functions is only a minimal requirement, though a very signi(cid:12)cant one, for a model to be acceptable. In recent years many higher order statistical measures of the observed distribution of galaxies have been discussed and calculated. A direct extension of the correlation function are the three- and four-point cor- relation functions, thoroughly discussed in literature. Since their estimate is very noisy and time-consuming, often some integral version of the n-point correlation functions is computed from the data. Particularly simple and interesting are, for instance, the skewness and the kurtosis of the count-in-cells (e.g. Coles & Frenk , Saunders et al. , Bouchet et al. , Gazta~naga , ). In Section we derive the higher order moments of our simulations, and compare them with the data. Finally, in Section we draw our conclusions. Power spectrum and correlation function We have performed N -body simulations with particles in cubes with a grid. The simulations were made with four di(cid:11)erent box sizes, L = h Mpc; h Mpc; h Mpc (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) and h Mpc in order to get a resolution high enough to identify the places where galactic (cid:0) halos form and, for the same spectrum and with the same method, to model the large scale matter distribution (cp. Kates et al. ). We consider a CDM model ((cid:10) = ; H = km/s/Mpc) with the transfer function of Bond and Efstathiou ( ) and the primordial perturbation spectra with broken scale invariance calculated by Gottl(cid:127)ober, M(cid:127)uller, and Starobinsky ( ). We have normalized the spectra with the one year COBE result (cid:27) ( ) = ( (cid:6) :)(cid:22)K=:K (Smoot et al. ). The in- T (cid:14) (cid:13)ationary model we are considering produces a negligible contribution of gravitational waves to the microwave anisotropy. The rms multipole values C for our perturbation spectrum are l substantially smaller than for the standard CDM model for l > (Gottl(cid:127)ober and M(cid:127)ucket, ). We did not include the new analysis presented in Wright et al. ( ) which leads to a almost % increase (% following G(cid:19)orski et al. ) of the large-scale normalization. Taking this into account, the biasing factor calculated from the spectra would decrease by the same amount. The linear analysis of the power spectrum (Gottl(cid:127)ober, M(cid:127)ucket, Starobinsky ) has shown that we need a bias b = : for transforming structures of dark matter particles into luminous matter. The power spectrum one actually computes from a (cid:12)nite size, (cid:12)nite resolution simulation is an acceptable approximation of the theoretical one only in a range of wavelengths k for which (cid:25)=L (cid:28) k (cid:28) (cid:25)=l, where l is the cell size and L is the box size. Then, to extend the range of validity of the power spectrum, we estimate the true P (k) by joining four power spectra for di(cid:11)erent box sizes (with L = l). We take the highest P (k) for any value of k , since the e(cid:11)ect of both (cid:12)nite size and (cid:12)nite resolution is generally to reduce the power amplitude. The reconstructed power spectrum coincides with the linear one at very large scales. At scales smaller than k (cid:25) :h Mpc the BSI model shows more (cid:0) nl n power than the linear spectrum and has a slope of k with n (cid:25) (cid:0):. Consequently, also the variance at h Mpc increases. Therefore, the biasing factor de(cid:12)ned as b = (cid:27) decreases. (cid:0) (cid:0) From the simulations we found an optimal value of b (cid:25) : (instead of the linear .). To compare the reconstructed spectrum with the spectrum of the CfA catalogue we transform it into redshift space using the Kaiser ( ) and Peacock ( ) corrections. The resulting spectrum is shown in Fig. , where we have assumed a biasing factor b = :. For comparison the spectrum of a simulation with the standard CDM spectrum is also included in this (cid:12)gure (b = : ). Note that in our simulation the highest scale mode (k ) min is overestimated by about % due to the chosen representation of the spectrum in k-space. The maximum value of the calculated spectrum would really be at k (cid:25) :h Mpc , and (cid:0) the spectrum will be bent down at small k 's as it is indicated by the data (though with very large error bars). We identify galaxies in our simulations by means of the peak-background split formalism. Let (cid:27) be the density (cid:13)uctuation variance on the grid cell of a given simulation, and (cid:23) (cid:27) the selection threshold: only particles residing in regions with density contrast (cid:14) > (cid:23) (cid:27) are identi(cid:12)ed with galaxies. Also, let (cid:24) be the correlation function of all particles, and (cid:24) the correlation function relative to the galaxies. The relation between the linear biasing (cid:23) = b (cid:17) ((cid:24) =(cid:24) ) and the threshold (cid:23) is quite complicated, because it involves the full probability (cid:23) distribution of the underlying (cid:12)elds, which is in general unknown. The simple formula given Figure : Comparison of simulated power spectra using initial conditions with broken scale invariance and a bias b = : (solid line), standard CDM model with b = : (dashed line) and data from the CfA catalog (Vogeley et al. ). in the classical paper by Kaiser ( ) cannot be applied here because it holds only if one identi(cid:12)es each region above threshold with a single galaxy, while we put the density (cid:12)eld in the regions above threshold equal to the underlying density (cid:12)eld. Moreover, the Kaiser formula holds only for Gaussian (cid:12)eld, while the matter clustering is certainly non-Gaussian by the present. A biasing scheme closer to ours has been investigated by Catelan et al. ( ), who give the relation b = b((cid:23); (cid:27)) for a lognormal (cid:12)eld, which is known to approximate the real density probability distribution. The general trend, at least in the limit of small correlation, is that b increases with increasing (cid:23) and decreasing (cid:27) (i.e., increasing the box size). As a consequence, in a larger box one has to use a smaller threshold (cid:23) to get the same ampli(cid:12)cation b. The lognormal relation better approximates our results: to have b (cid:25) : in a (cid:12)eld with (cid:27) (cid:25) : (relative to the h Mpc box) one needs a threshold (cid:23) (cid:25) . As (cid:0) we will show, with this threshold our model reproduces several observational features of the galaxy clustering. Finally, we have computed the spatial correlation function from the simulations. Using all particles the BSI model yields a slope of . - . with a correlation radius of h Mpc. (cid:0) A biasing procedure as described above changes the slope to . - ., and the correlation radius increases to (. - .)h Mpc (depending on the box length). In our simulation the (cid:0) standard CDM model yields a slope of . which is too steep, while its correlation radius is (cid:0) h Mpc for all particles. In Fig. we present the spatial correlation functions for our BSI model. slope=1.7 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 10 Figure : Two-point correlation function in simulations of BSI spectra in the h Mpc (cid:0) (dashed line) and h Mpc (solid line) box for particles in cells with overdensity (cid:23) = : (cid:0) and (cid:23) = :, respectively. The angular correlation function We estimate the angular correlation function in two ways: indirectly, from the power spec- trum of the N -body simulation, and directly, performing a pro jection of the N -body particles on a portion of sphere according to the luminosity function (Coles et al. , Moscardini et al. ). From the knowledge of P (k), one can derive the ACF w((cid:18)) via the Limber equation: R R kP (k)dk y (cid:30) (y)J (k(cid:18)y)dy w((cid:18)) = ; () R (cid:25) ( y (cid:30)(y)dy) where (cid:30)(y) = y exp [(cid:0)(y=y ) ] is the selection function. Inserting the linear power spectra (cid:0): (cid:3) into Eq. () and scaling the angular correlation function to the Lick depth (y (cid:25) h (cid:3) (cid:0) Mpc) one can compare the theoretical predictions with the observational data for w((cid:18)) from the APM survey (Maddox et al. ). However, the use of linear approximation in the calculation of w((cid:18)) is justi(cid:12)ed for large (cid:18) only. For angles up to (cid:18) (cid:24) , the agree- (cid:14) ment of the theoretical predictions with the data is very good, if spectra with (cid:1) = and (cid:0) (cid:0) k = (:::)h Mpc are considered (Gottl(cid:127)ober, M(cid:127)ucket, Starobinsky ). The nonlinear br behaviour can be described by using the power spectra reconstructed from the di(cid:11)erent boxes. As already mentioned on nonlinear scales the slope becomes P (k) / k so that the theo- (cid:0): retical angular correlation w((cid:18)) matches the observed small-angular behaviour w((cid:18)) / (cid:18) (cid:0): very well as long as the (cid:12)nite cell size of the smallest simulation box does not smear out the correlations. The unbiased angular correlation function calculated in this way are shown in Fig. a and b as dotted lines. In the case of the BSI model the line can be shifted to match the data assuming a biasing as introduced above. We have also computed the ACF by pro jecting the particles onto a spherical surface (cid:14) wide and estimating w((cid:18)) directly from the angular map. The details of this procedure have been already given in literature (e.g. Coles et al. , Moscardini et al. ), so we only sketch the method here. We have calculated the ACF both for all particles and for particles selected by a density threshold as reported in Section . We have replicated the simulation box by re(cid:13)ection in such a way that it covers a cone with opening and depth (cid:14) (cid:24) h Mpc, so as to reproduce the observational cone of the Lick catalog, to which the (cid:0) APM data have been scaled. We need three and eight levels for boxes of L = h Mpc and (cid:0) L = h Mpc, respectively, to contain the Lick cone (we did not consider the smallest and (cid:0) the biggest simulations here). We need the replication procedure to get both the necessary resolution on small scales and the Lick depth. However, by this method we get also a small systematic at (cid:18) > , as can be seen by testing the procedure with a Poisson distribution. (cid:14) Therefore, we have restricted our calculations to (cid:18) < . On small scales we are limited by (cid:14) the resolution of the simulations so that we considered only (cid:18) > : . (cid:14) According to the luminosity function we assign an absolute magnitude to each particle through a random process. From the distance to the observer, located in the center of the `original' box, we derive the apparent magnitude m. If m (cid:20) m = : (see Maddox Lick et al. ), the particle is pro jected on the surface. In Fig. we show the corresponding distribution of particles assuming a density threshold of particles per cell (see below). Since the largest contribution comes from the box in which the observer is situated, and from the box directly on top of it, we expect that the e(cid:11)ect introduced by the box replication is a minor one, at least for not very large separations. To test this, we have also calculated the ACF pro jecting only particles with brighter limiting apparent magnitudes, m = : and m = :. In this way the characteristic depth D = dex[(cid:0):(m (cid:0) M (cid:0) )] becomes (cid:3) (cid:3) much smaller, and the e(cid:11)ect of box duplication is greatly reduced. Then, we shift the ACF to the Lick scale by means of the scale dependence contained in the Limber equation (see e.g. Groth & Peebles , Peebles , Maddox et al. ). Our tests have con(cid:12)rmed the reliability of the method of replication. The estimator we use for the ACF is w((cid:18)) = F (cid:0) ; () C C C R where C C is the number of pairs in the real angular catalog at angular separation (cid:18) , C R is the number of pairs in the crossed real-random catalogs, and F is the ratio of densities of the random and the real catalog (F > to reduce the Poissonian noise). The results for the discussed models are shown in Fig. a (standard CDM model) and b (BSI model). The squares denote the angular correlation function for all particles. While the standard CDM simulation clearly cannot (cid:12)t the angular correlation function, we (cid:12)nd a good agreement with the dashed curves calculated from the reconstructed power spectrum. The scattering of the data is due to measurements in di(cid:11)erent directions and measurements in di(cid:11)erent simulation boxes. To introduce biasing in our BSI simulations, we follow the procedure described in Section . For retaining the full spatial resolution we identify galactic halo candidates on the grid by imposing discrete thresholds without any smoothing. Assuming a threshold of particles per cell ( h Mpc, (cid:27)=.) or particles per cell ( h Mpc, (cid:27) = :), and pro jecting the (cid:0) (cid:0) galaxies according to the galaxy luminosity function, we get reasonable angular correlation functions in the range of : < (cid:18) < (triangles in Fig. b). In comparison with the CDM Figure : Angular pro jection of particles in cells with overdensity (cid:23) = :. This map should be compared with the APM data. model, the selected galaxies show clearly the required extra power at separations larger than . The thresholds correspond to values of (cid:23) (cid:25) : and . for the smaller and larger box sizes, respectively. Higher-order moments If the distribution of galaxies is not Gaussian, the two-point correlation function does not fully characterize the clustering properties. Even if the initial distribution was Gaussian, as our in(cid:13)ationary model predicts, non-Gaussianity is induced by the non-linear gravitational e(cid:11)ects. Indeed, the deviations from Gaussianity can be expanded in a perturbative series of the variance of the (cid:13)uctuation (cid:12)eld (Juszkiewicz et al. , Kofman & Bernardeau ). Theory and observations agree in (cid:12)nding traces of non-Gaussianity up to very large scales, where (cid:24) (r) (cid:28) . A particularly simple measure of non-Gaussianity is provided by the higher order mo- ments of the counts in cells. Let us denote with n the number of galaxies in the i-th cell in i a partition of a given volume in N cells, and with ^n its mean. Let (cid:22) be the dimensionless m central moment of order m, (cid:22) =< (n (cid:0) ^n) > =^n , and let (cid:20) be the corresponding m i m m m dimensionless cumulant (or connected moment). To the (cid:12)rst few orders the relation between (cid:22) and (cid:20) is: (cid:20) = (cid:22) ; (cid:20) = (cid:22) ; (cid:20) = (cid:22) (cid:0) (cid:22) ; etc. (see, e.g., Cramer ). For a m m Gaussian (cid:12)eld, (cid:20) = for m > . Since the galaxies are supposed to be a discrete sampling m of an underlying continuous (cid:12)eld, we should subtract from the cumulants the so-called shot- noise terms, i.e. the corresponding moments of a Poissonian distribution. This is actually just a hypothesis, because the galaxies could be far from being a Poissonian sampling of the (cid:12)eld, but this is what has been routinely adopted in the data elaboration. In any case, it should be important only in the limit of very large scales, when the distribution will tend 1 1 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 standard CDM standard CDM standard CDM standard CDM 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 1 1 1 10 10 10 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 1 10 Figure : Comparison of the APM angular correlation function (Maddox et al. , dots) with the simulations: a) CDM spectrum (squares); b) spectra with broken scale invariance, both for all particles (squares) and for the biased particles (triangles). The dashed lines are the correlation functions calculated from the Limber equation. to be e(cid:11)ectively Poissonian, and of very small scales, when the discrete nature of galaxies dominate over the clustering. Let us notice another point about the moment estimators (cid:20) . m It is well known that when the moments of a distribution are evaluated from a sample, they are biased estimators of the true moments (see e.g. Cramer ). They are good estimators only in the limit of N ! , if N is the number of independent measures (i.e. the size of the sample). We will oversample the simulation box with a large number of randomly placed cells (of order for the smallest cells, down to for the largest ones), so that the =N correction should not be relevant: however, our cells are clearly not independent, so the biasing of the estimators can slightly a(cid:11)ect our results (as well as the data) on very large scales. Generally speaking, the cumulant (cid:20) of a (cid:13)uctuation (cid:12)eld (cid:12)ltered through a window n W (R) with characteristic scale R is related to the n-point reduced correlation function (cid:24) n via the integral equation " # Z m Y (cid:0)m (cid:20) (R) = V d x W (x ) (cid:24) (x ; :::x ) : () m i R i n m R V R i= Through Eq. (), a model for the higher-order correlation functions is re(cid:13)ected in a model for the cumulants (cid:20) . The most popular of such models is probably the hierarchical scaling, n according to which any function (cid:24) is proportional to products of n (cid:0) two-point functions n summed over all possible distinct tree graphs. Then, the following simple scaling relation is established among the cumulants (cid:20) : n (cid:20) = S (cid:20) ; () m m (cid:17) m where (cid:17) = m (cid:0) and where the S are constants (except for a weak scale dependence m m introduced by the data windowing). On scales much larger than the correlation length of the (cid:13)uctuation (cid:12)eld, the scaling relation holds for general random (cid:12)elds at the lowest non- trivial order in the variance. It is interesting that it seems to give a fairly good description of data down to quite small scales, perhaps even in the strongly non-linear regime (although possibly with a di(cid:11)erent set of S 's). On the other hand, higher-order perturbation theory m in gravitational clustering (along with assumption of initial Gaussianity) leads to a predic- tion of the constants S in the small variance regime, i.e. at large scales (Peebles , m Juszkiewicz & Bouchet , Bernardeau , ). After smoothing, the constants S m can be estimated as function of the linear power spectrum. Their value can depend also on the bias mechanism (Fry & Gazta~naga ), and marginally on the redshift space distortion (Fry & Gazta~naga ). Observationally, the scaling relation describes the data of several surveys from a few megaparsecs to h Mpc and beyond (Saunders et al. ; Loveday et al. ; Bouchet (cid:0) et al. ; Gazta~naga , ). Values for S up to m = are available in literature. m At large scales they are consistent with the gravitational perturbation theory; the errorbars however are quite large, especially for m > . In N -body simulations, the agreement with the gravitational perturbation theory is very good on large scales, while on small scales the e(cid:11)ects of (cid:12)nite volume and of discreteness make the results more controversial (e.g. Lahav , Colombi et al. ). We determined the second, third and fourth order cumulant for our models, in real space. We compared the variance/scale relation, the skewness/variance relation and the kurtosis/variance relation with the above mentioned observational data, in particular with 100 100 10 10 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 1000 1000 100 100 10 10 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 BSI model BSI model Stromlo-APM Stromlo-APM 1 1 10 10 100 100 G94 (APM) G94 (APM) 0.001 0.001 10 10 1 1 variance variance 0.1 0.1 1000 1000 100 100 10 10 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.001 0.001 100 100 10 10 G94 (APM) G94 (APM) 10 10 1 1 variance variance 0.1 0.1 1 1 100 100 10 10 1 1 variance variance 0.1 0.1 Figure : Higher order moments for the BSI simulation with threshold (cid:23) (cid:25) in real space. Open circles represent data from the h Mpc box, (cid:12)lled circles from the h Mpc (cid:0) (cid:0) box. Clockwise from top left: variance vs. scale, compared with the Stromlo-APM data of Loveday et al. ( ) (in this plot and in the following one the errors on our data are smaller than the symbol size); skewness vs. variance, compared with the APM data of Gazta~naga ( , G ; dashed line); kurtosis vs. variance, compared with the results from G which encompass scales from a few Mpc to h Mpc; and scaling coe(cid:14)cients S (triangles) and (cid:0) S (squares) vs. variance (open symbols for the small box, (cid:12)lled symbols for the large box). Figure : Scaling coe(cid:14)cients S (triangles) and S (squares) vs. variance relative to al l par- ticles in a h Mpc box, compared to the S ; S expected from gravitational perturbation (cid:0) theory (starred symbols). the Stromlo-APM data of Loveday et al. ( ) and the APM analysis of Gazta~naga (G ). The results are plotted in Fig. . The errors represent the scatter between eight sets of (cid:0) (cid:0) randomly placed cells. The open circles refer to the simulation box of h Mpc (selection at (cid:23) = :), the (cid:12)lled circles to the h Mpc box ((cid:23) = :). The results (cid:0) merge one onto the other, from to h Mpc, and correctly reproduce the observations. (cid:0) However, the hierarchical coe(cid:14)cients S ; S for the small box decline below the ones from the large box on the larger scales. This is probably a manifestation of the boundary e(cid:11)ects: the moments estimated from a simulation with a (cid:12)xed number of particles are systematically smaller than the moments of the parent distribution (Colombi et al. ). It is interesting to observe that the scaling constants seem to be arranged in a plateau on small (non-linear) scales, while they show a continuous decrease on large scales. The decrease is due to the fact that the e(cid:11)ective slope of the power spectrum increases for large scales. Indeed, in Fig. we plotted the expected S ; S for top-hat cells from gravitational perturbation theory (Bernardeau , scaling the spherical cells to our cubic cells) and compared with the results from the matter distribution (i.e., without bias) in the h Mpc box, on scales (cid:0) from to h Mpc. The agreement with the simulation results is reasonable in the small- (cid:0) variance regime; the residual discrepancy is maybe due to the conversion to cubic cells, and to (cid:12)nite-volume e(cid:11)ects. Conclusions This paper reports on the linear and non-linear results of an extensive set of N -body sim- ulations with broken scale invariance power spectrum. To our knowledge, this is the (cid:12)rst N -body simulation with a primordial power spectrum arising from a double in(cid:13)ationary model. The results make us believe that this broken scale invariance model is an interesting addition to the list of models that help in reconciling CDM with observations. We compared our simulations with various observations, such as spatial and angular correlation functions, power spectra, higher-order moments, and we found reasonable agreement. To extend the dynamical range, we joined the results from simulation boxes ranging from h Mpc to (cid:0) (cid:0) h Mpc. This allowed us to (cid:12)t, for instance, the observed power spectrum over almost two decades in wavelenght, and we could determine the scaling coe(cid:14)cients S ; S over three decades in the variance. The replication method we used to obtain a APM-like angular pro- jection has been successfully tested via the limiting magnitude shifting (although we found the method unsatisfactory for (cid:18) (cid:21) ). The BSI power spectrum we investigated contains, in addition to the overall normaliza- tion, two additional parameters, the height and the location of the break. In the double in(cid:13)ation model, the break height is connected with the ratio of the two mass parameters characterizing the two in(cid:13)ationary stages. The break scale is sensibly dependent on the initial value of the scalar (cid:12)eld. In Gottl(cid:127)ober, M(cid:127)uller, Starobinsky ( ) it was argued that this initial value may arise naturally as a quantum (cid:13)uctuation. Clearly this requires fur- ther elaboration. Here our aim was to show that the values of the two parameters which were derived from linear analysis lead to non-linear clustering properties in accordance with observations. We are grateful to Michael Vogeley for providing us with the data sets of the CfA power ACKNOWLEDGMENTS spectrum and to Steve Maddox for the APM angular correlation function. Ron Kates and J(cid:127)org Retzla(cid:11) helped us in preparing the N -body simulations. L.A. wishes to thank the Astrophysical Institute of Potsdam for the friendly hospitality during the early stages of preparation of this work, and St(cid:19)ephane Colombi for very fruitful discussions. The work of L.A. at Fermilab has been supported by DOE and NASA under grant NAGW-. L.A. also acknowledges CNR (Italy) for (cid:12)nancial support. S.G. acknowledges support from Fermilab for his stay at Batavia, where the (cid:12)nal version of this paper was prepared. References Bernardeau F. Ap. J. , Bernardeau F. , preprint CITA / Bouchet F.R., Strauss M.A., Davis M., Fisher K.B., Yahil A., & Huchra J.P. , Ap. J. , Bond, J.R., Efstathiou, G., , Ap. J. , L. Catelan P., Coles P., Matarrese S. & Moscardini L. Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. , Coles P. et al. Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. , Coles P. & Frenk C.S. Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. Coles P. & Jones B. Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. Colombi S., Bouchet F.R., & Schae(cid:11)er R., , Astron. Astrophys. , Cramer H. , Mathematical Methods of Statistics (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press) Efstathiou, G., Kaiser, N., Saunders, W., Lawrence, A., Rowan-Robinson, M., Ellis, R.S., and Frenk, C.S., , Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. , P Fisher, K., Davis, M., Strauss, M., Yahil, A. Huchra, J.P., , Ap. J. , . Fry J.N. & Gazta~naga E. Ap. J. , , Fry J.N. & Gazta~naga E. Ap. J. , , Gazta~naga E. , Ap. J. , , L Gazta~naga E. , Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. , G(cid:19)orski, K.M., Hinshaw, G., Banday,A.J., Bennett, C.L., Wright, E.L., Kogut, A., Smoot,G.F.,& Lubin, P. , Ap. J. , L Gottl(cid:127)ober, S., M(cid:127)ucket, J.P., , Astron. Astrophys. , . Gottl(cid:127)ober, S., M(cid:127)uller, V., Starobinsky, A.A., , Phys. Rev. D, . Gottl(cid:127)ober, S., M(cid:127)ucket, J.P., Starobinsky, A.A., , Ap. J. October. Groth E.J. & Peebles P.J.E. Ap. J. Juszkiewicz R., & Bouchet F.R. , in Proc. of the nd DAEC Meeting on the Distribution of Matter in the Universe, eds. G.A. Mamon, & D. Gerbal, Juszkiewicz R., Weinberg D. H., Amsterdamski P., Chodorowski M. & Bouchet F. , preprint (IANSS-AST /) Kaiser N. Ap. J. L Kates, R., Klypin, A., Kotok, N., Astron. Astrophys. , . Kates, R., Gottl(cid:127)ober, S., M(cid:127)ucket, J.P., M(cid:127)uller, V. Retzla(cid:11), J., , in preparation Kofman L. & Bernardeau, F. , preprint IFA- - Lahav O., Itoh M, Inagaki S. & Suto Y. , Ap. J. , Loveday J., Efstathiou G., Peterson B. A. & Maddox S.J. , Ap. J. , , L Maddox, S.J., Efstathiou, G., Sutherland, W.J., and Loveday, J., , Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. , P. Moscardini L. et al. Ap. J. , L Peacock J. A. Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. , P Peebles, P.J.E., , The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton, Princeton Uni- versity Press) Saunders W., Frenk C., Rowan-Robinson M., Efstathiou G., Lawrence A., Kaiser N., Ellis R., Crawford J., Xia X.-Y., Parry I. , Nature , , Smoot G.F., Bennett C.L., Kogut A., Wright E.L. et al. , , Ap. J. , L. Vogeley, M., Park, C., Geller, M. Huchra, J.P., , Ap. J. , L. Wright, E.L., Smoot, G.F., Bennett, C.L., Lubin, P.M. , Ap. J. , ,. This figure "fig1-1.png" is available in "png"(cid:10) format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9408104v1
astro-ph/9905348	2	9905	2000-01-12T20:00:07	Secular Evolution of Hierarchical Triple Star Systems	[ "astro-ph" ]	We derive octupole-level secular perturbation equations for hierarchical triple systems, using classical Hamiltonian perturbation techniques. By extending previous work done to leading (quadrupole) order to octupole level (i.e., including terms of order alpha^3, where alpha = a_1/a_2 < 1 is the ratio of semimajor axes) we obtain expressions that are applicable to a much wider range of parameters. For triple systems containing a close inner binary, we also discuss the possible interaction between the classical Newtonian perturbations and the general relativistic precession of the inner orbit. In some cases we show that this interaction can lead to resonances and a significant increase in the maximum amplitude of eccentricity perturbations. We establish the validity of our analytic expressions by providing detailed comparisons with the results of direct numerical integrations of the three-body problem obtained for a large number of representative cases. We also discuss applications of the theory in the context of several observed triple systems of current interest, including the millisecond pulsar PSR B1620-26 in M4, the giant planet in 16 Cygni, and the protostellar binary TMR-1. [short version]	astro-ph	astro-ph	Secular Evolution of Hierarchical Triple Star Systems Eric B. Ford1, Boris Kozinsky2, & Frederic A. Rasio3 Physics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 ABSTRACT We derive octupole-level secular perturbation equations for hierarchical triple systems, using classical Hamiltonian perturbation techniques. Our equations describe the secular evolution of the orbital eccentricities and inclinations over timescales long compared to the orbital periods. By extending previous work done to leading (quadrupole) order to octupole level (i.e., including terms of order α3, where α ≡ a1/a2 < 1 is the ratio of semimajor axes) we obtain expressions that are applicable to a much wider range of parameters. In particular, our results can be applied to high-inclination as well as coplanar systems, and our expressions are valid for almost all mass ratios for which the system is in a stable hierarchical configuration. In contrast, the standard quadrupole-level theory of Kozai gives a vanishing result in the limit of zero relative inclination. The classical planetary perturbation theory, while valid to all orders in α, applies only to orbits of low-mass objects orbiting a common central mass, with low eccentricities and low relative inclination. For triple systems containing a close inner binary, we also discuss the possible interaction between the classical Newtonian perturbations and the general relativistic precession of the inner orbit. In some cases we show that this interaction can lead to resonances and a significant increase in the maximum amplitude of eccentricity perturbations. We establish the validity of our analytic expressions by providing detailed comparisons with the results of direct numerical integrations of the three-body problem obtained for a large number of representative cases. In addition, we show that our expressions reduce correctly to previously published analytic results obtained in various limiting regimes. We also discuss applications of the theory in the context of several observed triple systems of current interest, including the millisecond pulsar PSR B1620−26 in M4, the giant planet in 16 Cygni, and the protostellar binary TMR-1. 0 0 0 2 n a J 2 1 2 v 8 4 3 5 0 9 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Subject headings: celestial mechanics, stellar dynamics -- planetary systems -- binaries: general -- planets and satellites: general 1Present address: Princeton University, Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Peyton Hall, NJ 08544; [email protected] [email protected] 3Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow; [email protected] -- 2 -- 1. Introduction About one third of all binary star systems are thought to be members of larger multiple systems. Most of these are hierarchical triples, in which the (inner) binary is orbited by a third body in a much wider orbit (see Tokovinin 1997a,b for recent results and compilations). Secular perturbations in triples result from the gravitational interaction between the inner binary and the outer object, possibly coupled to other processes such as stellar evolution, tidal effects, or, for compact objects, general relativistic effects. In strongly hierarchical triples, the two orbits never approach each other closely, and an analytic, perturbative approach can be used to calculate the evolution of the system. One particularly important perturbation is that of the orbital eccentricities. As the two orbits torque each other and exchange angular momentum, their eccentricities will undergo periodic oscillations over secular timescales (i.e., very long compared to the orbital periods). For non-coplanar systems, corresponding oscillations occur in the orbital inclinations. In contrast, according to canonical perturbation theory, there is no secular change in the semimajor axes, since the energy exchange between the two orbits averages out to zero over long timescales (see, e.g., Heggie 1975). For triple systems that begin their life near the stability limit, the result of an eccentricity increase can be catastrophic, leading to a collision between the two inner stars, if they started as a close pair, or, more typically, to the disintegration of the triple. This disintegration proceeds through a phase of chaotic evolution whose outcome is the ejection of one of the three stars (typically the least massive body) on an unbound trajectory, while the other two are left in a more tightly bound binary. A striking example of this process was revealed by the recent HST/NICMOS observations of the TMR-1 system in the Taurus star-forming region (Terebey et al. 1998). The HST images reveal a faint companion, most likely a giant planet or brown dwarf, that appears to have been ejected from its parent protostellar binary system. More indirect observational evidence is provided in the form of binary systems with anomalously high space velocities. In particular, the disintegration of short-lived triples formed in dense star forming regions may lead to binary OB runaway stars with very large peculiar velocities, such as HD 3950 (Gies & Bolton 1986). The stability of triple systems has been the subject of many theoretical studies. Most recently, Eggleton & Kiseleva (1995 and references therein) performed numerical experiments and provided an empirical stability criterion in terms of a critical ratio Ymin between the periastron distance of the outer orbit to the apastron distance of the inner orbit. For systems containing three nearly equal masses, one finds Ymin ≃ 3 − 6 depending on initial phases, eccentricities and inclinations. Holman & Wiegert (1999) study the stability of planets in binary systems, both for planets orbiting close to one of the two stars, and for planets orbiting outside the binary. All these stability analyses are based on numerical integrations of the three-body problem that are limited to 104 − 106 periods of the outer orbit. In some cases, however, the secular evolution timescale of the triple can be much longer than this, and therefore systems that remain stable for the duration of the numerical integration may in fact turn out to be unstable over secular timescales. Analytic results such as those derived here can therefore help determining more accurate stability criteria, -- 3 -- e.g., by integrating the secular evolution equations and verifying that the stability ratio remains > Ymin over the entire cycle of secular perturbations. Hierarchical triple star systems can play an important role in the dynamical evolution of dense star clusters containing primordial binaries. The cores of globular clusters, for example, are thought to contain a small but dynamically significant population of triple systems formed through dynamical interactions between primordial binaries (McMillan, Hut, & Makino 1991). Both stable and unstable triples can form easily through exchange and resonant interactions between binaries. In direct N -body integrations of the cluster dynamics, marginally stable or unstable triples can represent a significant computational bottleneck, since they require very long integrations of the orbital dynamics in order to resolve the outcome of the interaction (see, e.g., Mikkola 1997). Direct observational evidence for the dynamical production of triple systems in globular clusters is provided by the millisecond pulsar system PSR B1620−26 (Rasio, McMillan, & Hut 1995; Ford et al. 2000). This radio pulsar is a member of a hierarchical triple system located in the core of the globular cluster M4. The inner binary of the triple contains the ≃ 1.4M⊙ neutron star with a ≃ 0.3M⊙ white-dwarf companion in a 191-day orbit (Lyne et al. 1988; McKenna & Lyne 1988). The triple nature of the system was first proposed by Backer (1993) in order to explain the unusually high residual second and third pulse frequency derivatives left over after subtracting a standard Keplerian model for the pulsar binary. The pulsar has now been timed for eleven years since its discovery (see Thorsett et al. 1999 for the most recent update). These observations have not only confirmed the triple nature of the sytem, but they have also provided tight constraints on the mass and orbital parameters of the second companion. Theoretical modeling of the latest timing data (now including five pulse frequency derivatives) and preliminary measurements of the orbital perturbations of the inner binary have further constrained the mass of the second companion, and strongly suggest that it is a giant planet or a brown dwarf of mass ∼ 0.01 M⊙ at a distance of ∼ 50 AU from the pulsar binary (Joshi & Rasio 1997; Ford et al. 2000). Our treatment of the secular perturbations in this paper is based on classical celestial mechanics techniques and assumes that all three bodies are unevolving point masses. Whenever the stellar evolution time of one of the components becomes comparable to any of the orbital perturbation timescales computed here, the evolution of the triple can be affected significantly through mass losses, or mass transfer. For a recent discussion of stellar evolution in triples, see Iben & Tutukov (1999), who study the production of Type Ia supernovae from the mergers of heavy white dwarfs inside hierarchical triples. Mikkola & Tanikawa (1998) have studied the episodic mass transfer triggered by large eccentricity oscillations of the inner binary in the secular evolution of the triple system CH Cygni. Eggleton & Verbunt (1989) have discussed the possible relevance of triple star evolution for the formation of low-mass X-ray binaries. Our work focuses on triple systems containing well-separated components, in which the orbital perturbation timescales are short compared to any tidal dissipation time. For triple systems containing a close inner binary, tidal dissipation in the inner components provides a sink -- 4 -- of energy and angular momentum which can change substantially the character of the secular perturbations. For a recent discussion of tidal dissipation in triple systems containing a close inner binary, see the paper by Kiseleva, Eggleton, & Mikkola (1998). Bailyn & Grindlay (1987) have discussed the combined effects of tidal interaction and mass transfer for compact X-ray binaries in hierarchical triples. Mazeh & Shaham (1979) were the first to point out that the combination of tidal dissipation and secular eccentricity perturbations in triples could sometimes lead to a substantial orbital shrinking of the inner binary. One possible additional perturbation effect that we do take into account in this work is the general relativistic precession of the inner orbit if the inner binary contains compact objects. An example is provided by the PSR B1620−26 triple system, in which the inner binary contains a neutron star and a white dwarf. When the precession periods from general relativity and from Newtonian perturbations in the triple become comparable, a type of resonant effect is possible which leads to increased magnitudes for the orbital perturbations. A similar resonant effect has been mentioned by Soderhjelm (1984) for triples where the inner binary precesses under the influence of a rotationally-induced quadrupole moment in one of the stars. Our paper is organized as follows. In §2 we present a derivation of the octupole-order secular perturbation equations and we compare our results to those obtained in the quadrupole approximation and in classical planetary perturbation theory. In §3 the analytic results are compared to direct numerical integrations, and the effects of varying all relevant parameters are explored. In §4 we discuss the effects of the general relativistic precession of the inner orbit on the secular evolution of the triple, using the PSR B1620−26 system as an example. In §5 possible applications of our results to other observed triple systems are briefly discussed. 2. Analytic Secular Perturbation Theory In this section we present a simple analytic treatment of the long-term, secular evolution of hierarchical triple systems using time-independent Hamiltonian perturbation theory in which the small parameter is the ratio of semimajor axes. We discuss essential aspects of the lowest-order (quadrupole-level) approximation, which has been widely used to study hierarchical stellar triples. Then we extend the approximation to the octupole level and compare our results with results from the quadrupole and other approximations to show that the octupole-level equations derived here are valid for a far greater range of parameters. 2.1. Summary of Previous Work Our derivation of the octupole-level secular perturbation equations is based on classical perturbation methods of celestial mechanics. Studies of the long-term behavior of the solar system led Lagrange and Laplace to the creation of the first classical perturbation theory. Their -- 5 -- approach is applicable to a small class of planetary configurations with parameters similar to those of the solar system. The lunar problem was successfully attacked in the end of the last century by Delaunay who was the first to apply the method of canonical transformations to long-term perturbations. This method possesses much greater generality and was used to study a broad spectrum of problems. Brown (1936) was the first to apply canonical averaging to stellar triples, and he obtained the transformed quadrupole Hamiltonian. Kozai (1962) made use of the quadrupole approximation while studying the long-term motion of asteroids and noted several important properties of this approximation. Harrington (1968) obtained quadrupole-level expressions similar to Kozai's for general hierarchical systems of three stars. Soderhjelm (1984) derived octupole-level equations in the limit of low eccentricities and inclinations. In particular, he demonstrated that the quadrupole approximation fails in this regime because the octupole term in the Hamiltonian becomes dominant. Finally, Marchal (1990) averaged the octupole Hamiltonian keeping all terms up to third order in α and some terms of order α7/2. His Hamiltonian truncated at third order is identical to the one used in this paper. In the process of completing this work, we became aware of related ongoing work by other groups. In particular, Krymolowski & Mazeh (1999) have derived octupole-order perturbation equations following the same method used here. They retain some additional terms, of order α7/2, which were also partly included in Marchal's (1990) Hamiltonian. Based on a few numerical integrations that Krymolowski & Mazeh (1999) provide for a fairly strongly coupled system (α = 0.1), it appears that these higher-order terms have a negligible effect on the perturbations, although they can lead to slightly shorter periods of eccentricity oscillations for systems with low relative inclination. Eggleton (2000) has used a perturbation method based on the variation of the Runge-Lenz vector (see Heggie & Rasio 1996) to derive an extension of Kozai's theory to octupole order. Similar work has been done by Georgakarakos (2000), who concentrates on systems where the inner orbit is nearly circular. 2.2. Octupole Theory A hierarchical triple system consists of a close binary (m0 and m1) and a third body (m2) moving around the inner binary on a much wider orbit. To describe this structure it is convenient to use Jacobi coordinates, which are defined as follows. The vector r1 represents the position of m1 relative to m0, and r2 is the position of m2 relative to the center of mass of the inner binary (See Fig. 1). This coordinate system naturally divides the motion of the triple into two separate motions, and makes it possible to write the Hamiltonian as a sum of two terms representing the two decoupled motions and an infinite series representing the coupling of the orbits. Let the subscripts 1 and 2 refer to the inner and outer orbits, respectively. The coupling term is written as a power series in the ratio of the semi-major axes α ≡ a1/a2, which serves as the small parameter in our perturbation expansion. The complete Hamiltonian of the three-body system is given by -- 6 -- (Harrington 1968) k2m0m1 2a1 + F = k2(m0 + m1)m2 2a2 + k2 a2 ∞ Xj=2 αjMj(cid:18) r1 a1(cid:19)j(cid:18) a2 r2(cid:19)j+1 Pj(cos Φ), (1) where k2 is the gravitational constant, Pj's are the Legendre polynomials, Φ is the angle between r1 and r2, and Mj = m0m1m2 mj−1 0 − (−m1)j−1 (m0 + m1)j . (2) We shall deal with the expansion only up to third order in α. Let us define a set of canonical variables, known as Delaunay's elements, that provide a particularly convenient dynamical description of our three-body system. The angle variables are chosen to be l1, l2 = mean anomalies g1, g2 = arguments of periastron h1, h2 = longitudes of ascending nodes and their conjugate momenta L1 = m0m1 m0 + m1qk2(m0 + m1)a1 L2 = G1 = L1q1 − e2 1 m2(m0 + m1) m0 + m1 + m2qk2(m0 + m1 + m2)a2, G2 = L2q1 − e2 2, H1 = G1 cos i1 H2 = G2 cos i2, where e1, e2 are the orbital eccentricities and i1, i2 are the orbital inclinations. The usual canonical relations represent the equations of motion: dLj dt = ∂F ∂lj dlj dt = − ∂F ∂Lj , dGj dt = ∂F ∂gj dgj dt = − ∂F ∂Gj , dHj dt = ∂F ∂hj dhj dt = − ∂F ∂Hj , (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) where j = 1, 2. Note that H2 is the z-component of the angular momentum contributed by the perturbing body, the z-axis being the direction of the total angular momentum, perpendicular to -- 7 -- m2 r2 m1 Φ r1 m0 Fig. 1. -- Diagram illustrating the coordinate system used to describe the hierarchical triple system. -- 8 -- the invariable plane of the system (See Fig. 2). Equations (9) -- (11) appear to have six degrees of freedom, but they can be reduced to four by the theorem of elimination of nodes (Jeffrys & Moser 1966). The Hamiltonian contains h1 and h2 only in the combination h1 − h2, and it is symmetric with respect to the orientation of the line of nodes when the invariable plane is chosen as a reference plane. In other words, the Hamiltonian is symmetric with respect to rotations about the total angular momentum vector H. Thus, H1 and H2 enter the Hamiltonian only as H1 + H2 = H and can be eliminated from the Hamiltonian using the relations H1 = H2 = H 2 + G2 2H H 2 + G2 2H 2 1 − G2 2 − G2 1 (12) (13) Using the new canonical elements we can write the first four terms of the Hamiltonian (1) as Foct = F0 + F1 + F2 + F3 = β0 2L2 1 + β1 2L2 2 1 L6 + 8β2 L4 2!(cid:18) r1 2!(cid:18) r1 a1(cid:19)3(cid:18) a2 r2(cid:19)4 a1(cid:19)2(cid:18) a2 r2(cid:19)3 (5 cos3 Φ − 3 cos Φ), (3 cos2 Φ − 1) +2β3 L6 1 L8 where the mass parameters are , β0 = k4 (m0m1)3 m0 + m1 β1 = k4 (m0 + m1)3m3 2 m0 + m1 + m2 (m0 + m1)7 , β2 = β3 = k4 16 k4 4 (m0 + m1 + m2)3 (m0 + m1)9 (m0 + m1 + m2)4 m7 2 (m0m1)3 , m9 2(m0 − m1) (m0m1)5 . (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) Each term in the series is labeled according to the degree of the Legendre polynomial associated with it (same as the power of r1/r2). Following the standard nomenclature associated with multipole expansions we shall call the Hamiltonian containing the first three terms (up to j = 2) "quadrupole" and the third-order Hamiltonian (15) "octupole." The first two terms in expression (15) describe the unperturbed motion of the inner and outer binaries, and the higher-order terms describe the coupling. The quadrupole Hamiltonian contains the perturbation of order α2, the octupole Hamiltonian extends this to order α3. The complete Hamiltonian (1) contains the full description of the system. However, we are going to restrict our study to the long-term, secular behavior of the system, by averaging over short-period effects. Even though equation (15) is already an approximation of the full -- 9 -- H H2 G2 G1 H1 i 2. -- Diagram illustrating the relationships between the canonical variables and angular Fig. momenta. invariable plane -- 10 -- Hamiltonian, it contains information about short-period perturbations that needs to be eliminated. In particular the angle Φ depends on the mean anomalies. Further simplification is achieved through a canonical transformation of variables, called the von Zeipel transformation. Its essence is to replace the Delaunay elements with a set of new canonical coordinates and momenta that rid the Hamiltonian of the dependence on l1 and l2. The perturbed action variables are still periodic functions of the perturbed angle variables, but the former are no longer linear functions of time. The goal is to find such a set of action-angle variables that the perturbed Hamiltonian will be a function only of the action variables. In the end we can think of the Hamiltonian as describing the interaction between two weighted elliptical rings instead of point masses in orbits. It is important to note that we do not simply average the Hamiltonian with respect to these variables, since this would destroy the canonical structure of the equations of motion, but instead proceed in a more cautious and intricate manner. We start by requiring that the new Hamiltonian be equal to the old one, since changing variables does not change the energy, and expanding both sides of the equality as Taylor series in α. Then we go order by order to identify the terms in the transformed Hamiltonian, using the result of the previous order calculation in each step. The theory behind the Von Zeipel method is very well presented and illustrated by Goldstein (1980, section 11-5) and Hagihara (1972). Additionally, Harrington (1968, 1969) has applied this method to the quadrupole Hamiltonian. We followed exactly the same prescription but all the way to third order. Here we present only the results of the von Zeipel averaging procedure, omitting the laborious algebraic details. Let us define the following convenient quantities θ = cos i = H 2 − G2 2G1G2 1 − G2 2 , (20) where H = G1 + G2 and H = H is given by initial conditions and i = i1 − i2 is the mutual inclination. The angle ϕ between the directions of periastron is given by The doubly-averaged Hamiltonian is given by cos ϕ = − cos g1 cos g2 − θ sin g1 sin g2. ¯Foct = C2 · {(2 + 3e2 +C3 · e1e2nA cos ϕ + 10θ(1 − θ2)(1 − e2 1) sin g1 sin g2o, 1)(3θ2 − 1) + 15e2 1(1 − θ2) cos 2g1} where C2 = k4 16 (m0 + m1)7 m7 2 (m0 + m1 + m2)3 (m0m1)3 L4 1 2G3 2 L3 , C3 = 15 16 k4 4 (m0 + m1)9 (m0 + m1 + m2)4 m9 2(m0 − m1) (m0m1)5 L6 1 2G5 2 L3 , (21) (22) (23) (24) -- 11 -- B = 2 + 5e2 1 − 7e2 1 cos 2g1, A = 4 + 3e2 1 − 5 2 (1 − θ2)B. (25) (26) Note that the Hamiltonian (22) does not contain any dependence on l1 or l2 because these variables have been integrated out as a result of the canonical transformation. The actual differences between the original and the transformed variables are small (of order α or smaller) and periodic. Variables appearing in equation (22) are only approximations of the old variables defined in equations (5) -- (8), and they can be thought of as the averages of the old variables. This Hamiltonian is equivalent to the Hamiltonian given by Marchal (1990; see his eqs. [252] -- [255]). The absence of l1 and l2 from the transformed Hamiltonian implies that L1 and L2 are constants of the motion, which in turns implies that, in our approximation, the transformed semi-major axes a1 and a2 are constant. Thus, the only secularly changing parameters in this model are e1, e2, g1, g2, and i, which is coupled to e1 and e2 by relation (20). The equations of motion are derived from the Hamiltonian (22) using the canonical relations dei dt = ∂ei ∂Gi ∂ ¯Foct ∂gi , dgi dt ∂ ¯Foct ∂Gi . = − After regrouping terms, the octupole-level secular perturbation equations follow: (27) (28) (29) (30) and dg2 dt dg1 dt de1 dt = C2 · 6(cid:26) 1 θ 1(3 − 5 cos 2g1)i(cid:27) 1)o − 5θB cos ϕi 1 θ + G2 G1 h4θ2 + (5 cos 2g1 − 1)(1 − e2 1 − θ2)i + G2 h2 + e2 G1(cid:19)h sin g1 sin g2nA + 10(3θ2 − 1)(1 − e2 −C3 · e2(e1(cid:18) 1 1 − e2 e1G1 h sin g1 sin g2 · 10θ(1 − θ2)(1 − 3e2 − 1 − e2 G1 n30e1(1 − θ2) sin 2g1o + C3 · e2 1) + cos ϕ(3A − 10θ2 + 2)i), 1 − e2 G1 n35 cos ϕ(1 − θ2)e2 1)(1 − θ2) cos g1 sin g2 − A(sin g1 cos g2 − θ cos g1 sin g2)o, 1(3 − 5 cos 2g1)i + G1 h2 + e2 −10θ(1 − e2 1 1 1 = C2 · 1 sin 2g1 = C2 · 3(cid:26) 2θ +C3 · e1( sin g1 sin g2" 4e2 + cos ϕ"5Bθe2(cid:18) 1 G1 + θ G2(cid:19) + 2 + 1 e2G2 G2 h4 + 6e2 10θ(1 − θ2)(1 − e2 4e2 2 + 1 e2G2 A#), 1 + (5θ2 − 3)(2 + e2 1) − e2(cid:18) 1 θ 1(3 − 5 cos 2g1))i(cid:27) 1))# G2(cid:19) (A + 10(3θ2 − 1)(1 − e2 G1 + (31) -- 12 -- de2 dt = −C3 · e1 2 1 − e2 G2 n10θ(1 − θ2)(1 − e2 1) sin g1 cos g2 + A(cos g1 sin g2 − θ sin g1 cos g2)o.(32) This system of coupled nonlinear differential equations describes the octupole-level behavior of hierarchical triples and can be easily integrated numerically to determine the secular evolution of a hierarchical triple for any initial configuration. We found that for calculations with small eccentricities it is better to use the transformed set of variables e1 sin g1, e1 cos g1, e2 sin g2, and e2 cos g2. These equations can be integrated numerically much more rapidly than the full equations of motion. 2.3. Comparison with Quadrupole-Level Results The quadrupole results of Kozai (1962) and Harrington (1969) have found numerous applications in recent studies of planetary, pulsar, and stellar systems. Mazeh & Shaham (1979) calculated the quadrupole-level, long-term periodic behavior of triples and used their results to study high-amplitude eccentricity modulations of systems with large initial inclination. Holman et al. (1997) used the quadrupole-level theory of Kozai to analyze the dynamical evolution of the planet in the binary star 16 Cygni. Rasio, Ford, & Kozinsky (1997) used the same theory to study long-term eccentricity perturbations in the PSR B1620−26 pulsar system. The quadrupole Hamiltonian can be obtained from expression (22) by dropping the C3 term: Fq = C2 · {(2 + 3e2 1)(3θ2 − 1) + 15e2 1(1 − θ2) cos 2g1}. (33) Note that Fq is independent of g2, meaning that, in the quadrupole approximation, G2 is a constant of the motion, and so is e2 by equation (27). Therefore, to quadrupole order in secular perturbation theory, there is no variation in the eccentricity of the outer orbit. This is a well-known result (see, e.g., Marchal 1990, Sec. 10.2.3). Now there is only one degree of freedom left, so the evolution of the inner eccentricity is described by dg1 dt with = C2 · 6(cid:26) 1 G1 h4θ2 + (5 cos 2g1 − 1)(1 − e2 1 − θ2)i + θ G2 h2 + e2 1(3 − 5 cos 2g1)i(cid:27) , de1 dt = C2 · 1 1 − e2 G1 n30e1(1 − θ2) sin 2g1o. (34) (35) The advantage of using the quadrupole approximation is that it can describe the secular behavior of systems with high relative inclination and a wide range of initial eccentricities, regimes not covered by the classical planetary perturbation theory. As in the classical theory, the quadrupole-level perturbation equations (34) -- (35) can be solved exactly for the period and amplitude of oscillation (Kozai 1962). The period of eccentricity oscillations is given approximately by -- 13 -- Pe ≃ P1(cid:18) m0 + m1 m2 a1(cid:19)3 (cid:19)(cid:18) a2 (cid:16)1 − e2 2(cid:17)3/2 , (36) where P1 is the orbital period of the inner binary (Mazeh & Shaham 1978). This expression should be multiplied by a coefficient of order unity which can be obtained using Weierstrass's zeta function as shown by Kozai (1962). The secular evolution can be visualized with the help of phase-space diagrams of e1 vs cos g1. An example is provided in Figure 3. Each contour corresponds to an initial condition with a certain value of the total angular momentum H. Since G2 is fixed, e1 is coupled to i through equation (20), so the relative inclination oscillates with the same period as e1. The up-down symmetry forces similar behavior in g1-e1 phase space for both g1 ∈ [−π, 0] and g1 ∈ [0, π]. One obvious feature is the existence of two regimes: libration and circulation. The libration island generally appears when the initial inclination is greater than some critical value, which for most systems is around icrit ≃ 40◦. Kozai (1962) calculated that for α ≤ 0.10, 38.960◦ ≤ icrit ≤ 39.231◦. From the shape of the large libration island we see that e1 can grow from a very small initial value to a very large maximum. Holman et al. (1997) approximate the maximum inner eccentricity as where io is the initial relative inclination. Libration can occur for low inclinations as well, but this does not lead to large eccentricity oscillations. e1,max ≃ (cid:16)1 − (5/3) cos2 io(cid:17)1/2 , (37) Several erroneous features of the quadrupole approximation are worth noting. For an initial condition with e1 = 0, no evolution occurs at all. This is especially significant in a case where there is no libration island, since in that case the eccentricity perturbation would appear to approach zero continuously as the initial eccentricity is decreased. Similarly, in the coplanar case (θ = 1), the theory predicts no evolution of eccentricity. From the classical planetary perturbation theory (§2.4), which assumes low eccentricities and inclinations, we know that this is not correct. These features also contradict the octupole-level results (§2.2), as well as the results of direct numerical integrations (§3.2). We conclude that the quadrupole approximation fails for low inclination and for low inner eccentricity. However, it remains qualitatively applicable in the high-inclination regime. The octupole-level theory has more degrees of freedom and covers most regimes of hierarchical triple configurations. The perturbation equations (29) -- (32) indicate that there are no additional conserved quantities apart from the obvious ones (total angular momentum and total energy). In contrast to the quadrupole theory, the quantities e2 and g2 now vary with time and the behavior is much harder to visualize. We can notice striking qualitative differences between the two theories by looking at phase-space diagrams. An example is provided in Figure 4. Trajectories are no longer closed, and transitions between libration and circulation occur, since the angular momentum of the outer orbit now evolves with time. Thus, we now have more than one frequency in the secular oscillations. -- 14 -- 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 1 0.5 e 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 cos(g1) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Fig. 3. -- Phase space trajectories obtained in the quadrupole approximation for a system with m2/m1 = 10−3, m3/m1 = 1, α−1 = 100, e2 = 0.9, and initial values of e1 ranging from 0.02 to 0.9. The libration contours were obtained by setting the initial value of g1 = 90◦. -- 15 -- 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 1 0.5 e 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 cos(g1) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Fig. 4. -- Phase-space trajectory of the same system as in Figure 3 with initial e1 = 0.02, but with the octupole terms included in the integration. (Note that this corresponds to a single trajectory in Fig. 3.) -- 16 -- Figure 5 demonstrates that a system can have a qualitatively different behavior from what is expected in the quadrupole approximation. While the quadrupole theory predicts periodic variations of constant amplitude, according to the octupole equations (and in agreement with the results of a direct numerical integration) the amplitude grows very close to unity. This leads to a very small periastron distance and the possibility of a tidal interaction or collision between the two inner stars. Thus, one must exercise great caution when modeling systems using the quadrupole approximation. Ignoring octupole-level terms can lead to completely invalid results. 2.4. Comparison with Classical Planetary Perturbation Theory For application to many problems in the context of the Solar System, a classical perturbation theory was developed many years ago that applies to low-eccentricity, low-inclination orbits of planets around a central star (one dominant mass). This theory does not assume that the ratio of semimajor axes is small, and therefore it provides results valid to all orders in α. A detailed account of the planetary theory can be found in Brouwer & Clemence (1961, Chap. 16). For an excellent pedagogic summary, see Dermott & Nicholson (1986). Rasio (1994, 1995) used the classical theory to study the eccentricity perturbations in the PSR B1620-26 triple system in the limit of coplanar orbits, and derived simple approximate expressions for the period and amplitude of eccentricity oscillations in various limits. Here we will only consider the variations of the eccentricities, since the results for inclinations are very similar. It turns out that the inclination evolution is decoupled from the eccentricity evolution, and so the two can be solved separately. Because eccentricities are very small and can vanish, it is better to use the variables h1 = e1 sin g1 h2 = e2 sin g2 k1 = e1 cos g1 k2 = e2 cos g2. (38) (39) Since angular momentum is conserved and the mutual inclination stays constant to first order, the two eccentricities vary 90◦ out of phase. The linear system of equations describing the secular evolution of eccentricities in planetary perturbation theory is dh1 dt dk1 dt dh2 dt = +A11k1 − A12k2 = −A11h1 + A12h2 = −A21k1 + A22k2 (40) (41) (42) -- 17 -- Fig. 5. -- These results illustrate the potential danger of using the quadrupole approximation. The inner eccentricity is shown as a function of time for a system with m1/m0 = 10−3, m2/m1 = 1, α−1 = 100, initial eccentricities e1 = 0.05 and e2 = 0.9, and an initial relative inclination i = 70◦. Time is given in years assuming a1 = 1 AU and m0 = 1 M⊙. The solid line is from the integration of the octupole-level perturbation equations, while the dashed line is from a direct numerical integration of the three-body system (see §3.1). In the quadrupole approximation all oscillations would have the same amplitude as the first shown here. Notice how the eccentricity oscillations in fact increase in amplitude, making the inner periastron separation quite small. At some point other effects such as general relativistic precession and tidal dissipation (not to mention a collision between the two inner stars) could become significant. -- 18 -- dk2 dt = +A21h1 − A22h2, (43) where the A's are defined in terms of Laplace coefficients, which we truncate at third order in α to obtain A11 = 3 4 k a3/2 1 a3 2 m2 √m0 + m1 , A12 = 15 16 k a5/2 1 a4 2 m2 √m0 + m1 A21 = 15 16 k a3 1 a9/2 2 m1 √m0 + m2 , A22 = 3 4 k a2 1 a7/2 2 m1 √m0 + m2 , , (44) (45) where a1 and a2 are the averaged semimajor axes measured from m0 to m1 and m2, respectively. Now we rewrite the system in terms of familiar quantities to find de1 dt de2 dt = A12e2 sin g, = −A21e1 sin g, dg dt = A22 − A11 + A12 e2 e1 cos g − A21 e1 e2 cos g, (46) (47) (48) where g = g2 − g1. Indeed the use of this variable is convenient, since for coplanar orbits there is no well-defined line of nodes, and only the relative longitudes of perihelia are important. Upon expanding the octupole equations (29) -- (32) to first order in e1 and e2 we obtain an identical linear system of differential equations, but with the A's replaced by B11 = B12 = B21 = B22 = 12C2 L1 = 3 4 k 4C3 L1 4C3 L2 = = 15 16 15 16 12C2 L2 = 3 4 k k k a3/2 1 a3 2 a5/2 1 a4 2 a3 1 a9/2 2 a2 1 a7/2 2 m2 , √m0 + m1 m2(m0 − m1) (m0 + m1)3/2 , m0m1(m0 − m1)√m0 + m1 + m2 (m0 + m2)3 m0m1√m0 + m1 + m2 (m0 + m1)2 . (49) (50) (51) (52) , It is easy to see that, in the limit where m0 ≫ m1 and m0 ≫ m2, the two sets of equations coincide, as they should. This establishes the accuracy of our analytic results in this limit. In general, the two sets of equations differ in the dependence of the coefficients on the masses. Although the two theories use different coordinate systems (Jacobi vs heliocentric), this alone does -- 19 -- not explain the difference. Instead, one must remember that the classical theory was derived from Lagrange's planetary equations (see Brouwer & Clemence 1961), which assume that the disturbing functions (proportional to m1 and m2) are small. Therefore the approximation is valid only if m0 ≫ m1, m2. This can also be seen by considering the m0 = m1 case, for which Heggie & Rasio (1996, App. B) proved that the variation of e1 vanishes to all orders in α if the initial e1 = 0. In contrast, the classical planetary perturbation equation (46) would predict a nonzero perturbation of e1 for this case (since A12 6= 0, while our coefficient B12 = 0 for m0 = m1). Our octupole-level analytic results do not depend on any assumption about the three masses, as long as the system can be modeled as a hierarchical triple. The octupole equations predict constant eccentricities in the case where m0 = m1 and i = 0. This happens because the odd-power coefficients are proportional to m0 − m1 in the Hamiltonian (1), so the leading terms vanish. There is no reason to expect the octupole approximation to work for this very particular case. However, in §3.6 we show explicitly by comparison with direct numerical integrations that the mass-dependences of our equations (29) -- (32) are valid for wide ranges of both mass ratios. 3. Comparison with Direct Numerical Integrations We have performed extensive numerical integrations of hierarchical triple systems using both our octupole-order secular perturbation equations (hereafter OSPE) and direct three-body integrations. In this section we present a sample of results that establish the validity and accuracy of our analytic results, and at the same time illustrate the dependences of the perturbations on different parameters. 3.1. Numerical Methods For the numerical integration of the OSPE we change variables from (e1, g1, e2, g2) to (e1 sin g1, e1 cos g1, e2 sin g2, e2 cos g2) to remove singularities associated with the longitude of pericenter for circular orbits. We perform the numerical integration of the OSPE using the Burlisch-Stoer integrator of Press et al. (1992). Energy and angular momentum are automatically conserved, since the semimajor axes are considered constant and the relative inclination of the orbits varies to conserve angular momentum. We present results obtained using an accuracy parameter EPS = 10−8. We found that reducing the integration step sizes did not make a significant numerical difference for several test systems. We have compared the results of the OSPE integrations with direct three-body integrations using a fixed timestep mixed-variable symplectic (hereafter MVS) integrator (Wisdom & Holman 1991) available in the software package SWIFT (Levison & Duncan 1991). For most integrations, we used a timestep of P1/40, where P1 is the orbital period of the inner binary. Energy and angular momentum were typically conserved to one part in 106 and 1012, respectively. For some -- 20 -- high-eccentricity systems we reduced the timestep to a value as small as P1/600. This MVS integrator was designed for systems in which m0 is much larger than both m1 and m2. For systems with m1/m0 >∼ 0.1 we made use of a newer MVS integrator modified to accommodate arbitrary mass ratios, kindly provided to us by Jack Wisdom and Matt Holman. In a number of test calculations with this newer integrator, we varied the timestep systematically to verify that our results are not affected by numerical errors. To complement integrations using the MVS integrator, we also used SWIFT's Burlisch-Stoer (BS) integrator in a few test runs. This integrator is valid for arbitrarily strong interactions between any pair of bodies, but is not well suited for very long integrations. We have only performed a small number of these tests, since the BS integrations require a much longer computer time. Energy and angular momentum in BS integrations were typically conserved to one part in 105. Most BS integrations were stopped after one full oscillation of e1, which we used to determine the "maximum eccentricity perturbation" of the inner orbit, although, as pointed out in §2.3, the true long-term secular evolution of the eccentricity will not, in general, be strictly periodic. A typical BS run lasting for ∼ 105P2 took about 400 CPU hours on a MIPS R10000 processor, while the same run using the MVS integrator would only take about 2 CPU hours. The numerical integrations all started with initial values of the inner and outer arguments of pericenter of 0◦ and 180◦, respectively. This choice leads to the maximum eccentricity induced in the inner binary in both the planetary limit (see §2.4) and the quadrupole approximation (see §2.3). We have performed additional integrations to verify that the remaining angles (longitudes of ascending node and initial anomalies) do not significantly affect the secular evolution of the system. For large inclinations, the initial argument of pericenter of the inner binary is important in determining whether the system will undergo circulation or libration, if the inner orbit has a significant initial eccentricity (see Fig. 3). However, if the inner orbit is nearly circular initially, then the initial values of the angles are of little importance since the inner orbit can switch from circulation to libration and vice versa. For coplanar orbits, the magnitude of the angular momentum of the inner orbit increases when g = g2 − g1 < 0 and decreases when g > 0. For small, nonzero inclinations this can still serve as a guide when considering the effect of varying the angles. 3.2. Eccentricity Oscillations First, we investigate the dependence of the maximum eccentricity perturbation of the inner orbit on the initial relative inclination (see Fig. 6). We see that, as expected (Sec. 2.3), for small inclinations, i <∼ 40◦, the perturbations are dominated by the octupole term, while for higher inclinations the quadrupole-level perturbations dominate. In both regimes the OSPE results match the direct numerical integrations very well. Near the transition, numerical integrations (both OSPE and MVS) show a beat-like pattern of eccentricity oscillations suggesting an interference between the quadrupole and octupole terms. Note that the results of Figure 6 are for a system with m1 ≪ m0 and m2 ≪ m0, for which the analytic results from the classical planetary -- 21 -- Fig. 6. -- Maximum eccentricity of the inner orbit after a single oscillation, as a function of the relative inclination. Here m1/m0 = 10−3, m2/m0 = 0.01, α−1 = 100, e2 = 0.05, and the initial e1 = 10−5. The squares are from MVS integrations, and the double dashes on either side are from OSPE integrations with varying initial longitude of periastron. The horizontal line indicates the amplitude of the eccentricity oscillations calculated analytically in the planetary theory (§2.4). The solid curve indicates the amplitude of eccentricity oscillations calculated analytically according to the quadrupole-level theory for i >∼ 40◦. -- 22 -- perturbation theory (Sec. 2.4) can be applied for small eccentricities and inclinations. We see that the agreement with both MVS and OSPE integrations is excellent for i <∼ 30◦. We now discuss in some more detail the evolution of systems in the low- and high-inclination regimes. 3.2.1. Large-inclination Regime Figure 7 illustrates the evolution of e1, g1, e2, g2, and i obtained from a numerical MVS integration for a typical system with large relative inclination. For large inclination, the secular quadrupole-level perturbations dominate the evolution. In the quadrupole approximation the inner eccentricity undergoes periodic oscillations, while the outer eccentricity remains constant. Indeed, we see in Figure 7 that e1 undergoes approximately periodic oscillations of large amplitude (with corresponding oscillations in i), while e2 remains approximately constant. The small-amplitude (about 10%) fluctuations in e2 are due mainly to the smaller, octupole-level perturbations. Deviations from strict periodicity in the variation of e1 and i are also caused by octupole-level perturbations. The period of a quadrupole eccentricity oscillation is a function of the mass ratios and the outer eccentricity (see §2.3). Our numerical integrations of the OSPE reveal that the most significant corrections to this period come from the variable time spent at low eccentricities. Equation (35) implies that the time derivative of e1 is small when the inner orbit has a small eccentricity. Then the octupole (and higher-order) perturbations can become important, causing significant variation in the time a system will spend with a small inner eccentricity. This effect can be seen clearly in Figure 7. The OSPE do not correctly describe the evolution of a systems starting with e1 = 0. However for any system with arbitrarily small but nonzero e1, the inner orbit can switch back and forth between libration and circulation in the e1-g1 plane, achieving the full range of eccentricities. In our MVS integrations the short-period variations (averaged out in secular perturbation theory) provide the necessary perturbations to allow for the full eccentricity oscillations, even if the initial e1 = 0. 3.2.2. Small-inclination Regime For small inclinations (i <∼ 40◦), the secular octupole-level perturbations dominate and both e1 and e2 typically undergo very small-amplitude fluctuations, as does the relative inclination (Fig. 8). In the octupole approximation angular momentum is periodically transferred from one orbit to the other. In this regime, the special case of initially circular orbits is stable to eccentricity oscillations. Short-period perturbations will still cause small fluctuations in both eccentricities, but since the inclination does not undergo large oscillations, the angular momentum transferred from -- 23 -- Fig. 7. -- Typical evolution of the eccentricities, longitudes of periastron, and relative inclination for a system in the high-inclination regime. Here m1/m0 = 10−3, m2/m0 = 0.01, α−1 = 100, the initial inclination i = 60◦, and the initial eccentricities e1 = 10−5 and e2 = 0.05. Time is given in years assuming a1 = 1 AU and m0 = 1 M⊙. These results were obtained using numerical MVS integrations. -- 24 -- one orbit to another is limited by angular momentum conservation, preventing large eccentricities from developing in either orbit. For inclinations approaching ∼ 40◦, the octupole-level interaction still leads to a noticeable amplitude oscillation superimposed onto the quadrupole-level result. For a small range of inclinations the two eccentricity oscillations can become comparable leading to a secular evolution with a period and amplitude larger than either of the two oscillations in isolation. 3.3. Dependence on the Ratio of Semimajor Axes Numerical results illustrating the dependence of the maximum eccentricity perturbation of the inner orbit on the ratio of semimajor axes are shown in Figure 9. Some small deviations between the OSPE and MVS results appear for small a2/a1, where higher-order secular perturbations may be significant. As predicted by the quadrupole-level approximation, the amplitude of the eccentricity oscillations becomes independent of α for high inclinations. 3.4. Dependence on the Initial Eccentricity Figure 10 shows the dependence of the maximum inner eccentricity on its initial value. For low inclinations increasing the inner eccentricity nearly adds to the maximum induced eccentricity. In the high-inclination regime increasing the initial inner eccentricity does not affect the maximum inner eccentricity significantly until the two become comparable. 3.5. Dependence on the Outer Eccentricity Figure 11 shows the effect of varying the outer eccentricity. The OSPE and MVS integrations agree precisely for moderate eccentricities, but show discrepancies for both very large and very small e2. For low i and e2 <∼ 10−2, short-period eccentricity variations become important. These are not included in the OSPE since they were averaged out of the Hamiltonian. Formally, i = e1 = e2 = 0 is a fixed point, since it implies de1/dt=0 in the OSPE. For low inclinations and eccentricities, the short-period eccentricity oscillations determine the maximum eccentricity, since this fixed point is stable to the small-amplitude short-period perturbations. However, for large relative inclinations, the initial condition e1 ≃ e2 ≃ 0 will lead to large amplitude oscillations as discussed in §3.2.1. Thus, the small-amplitude, short-period oscillations not included in the OSPE allow the system to explore the full range of allowed eccentricities. For large e2, some discrepancies may be caused by inaccuracies in the MVS integrations: the -- 25 -- Fig. 8. -- Typical evolution of a system in the low-inclination regime. All parameters are as in Fig. 7, except that the initial inclination i = 15◦. These results were obtained using numerical MVS integrations. -- 26 -- Fig. 9. -- Maximum eccentricity e1 as a function of the ratio of semimajor axes α−1 = a2/a1. The integrations are for a system with m1/m0 = 10−3, m2/m0 = 0.01, and initial eccentricities e1 = 10−5 and e2 = 0.05. The various symbols (lines) are from MVS (OSPE) integrations of systems with various relative inclinations: 0◦ (open triangles, solid line), 15◦ (open squares, dotted line -- here quasi-indistinguishable from the solid line, cf. subsequent figures), 30◦ (open circles, short-dashed line), 45◦ (solid triangles, long-dashed line), 60◦ (solid squares, short-dash-dotted line), 75◦ (solid circles, long-dash-dotted line), and 89◦ (stars, short-dash-long-dashed line). -- 27 -- Fig. 10. -- Maximum change in e1 as a function of its initial value. These integrations are for m1/m0 = 10−3, m2/m0 = 0.01, e2 = 0.05, and α−1 = 100. The symbols and lines are as in Fig. 9. -- 28 -- fixed timestep implies that periastron passages may not be fully resolved. We have performed additional MVS integrations with a smaller timestep (shown in Fig. 11) and a smaller number of BS integrations to verify that most of the discrepancy is indeed caused by inaccuracies in the MVS integrator and not the OSPE. However, for sufficiently large e2, the disagreement remains. As periastron passages begin to resemble close dynamical encounters, the averaging over orbits becomes invalid, and the OSPE are no longer applicable. In this limit where the outer orbit is nearly parabolic, it may be better to treat each periastron passage as a separate encounter. The results of Heggie & Rasio (1996) may be used to calculate analytically the eccentricity perturbation of the inner binary after each encounter. 3.6. Dependence on the Mass Ratios First, we investigate the dependence of the maximum induced e1 on m2 (Fig. 12). The MVS and OSPE integrations are in excellent agreement, except for very large m2. For sufficiently large m2, the binding energy of m1 to m2 becomes comparable to its binding energy to m0, and the inner orbit deviates significantly from a Keplerian orbit, making the basic assumption of a hierarchical triple invalid. As discussed in §3, the MVS integrator was not designed for large m2/m0. However, we have performed a number of test integrations, both BS and MVS (with a smaller timestep), and found that the MVS integrations are generally accurate even for m2 >∼ m0, provided that the system is stable. Next, we explore the effects of varying the ratio m1/(m0 + m1) (Fig. 13). The agreement between MVS and OSPE results is very good, even when m1 ≃ m0. In the OSPE, the octupole- level perturbations vanish when m2/m1 = 1, removing the dominant term of the expansion for low inclinations. Therefore we did not expect the OSPE to properly model the systems with low inclinations. Using the modified MVS integrator of Wisdom and Holman (see §3.1) for m1/m0 >∼ 0.1, we find surprisingly good agreement between the OSPE and MVS results for both low and high inclinations. In particular the OSPE and MVS integrations agree on the maximum induced eccentricity in the equal-mass case, m1 = m0, which is an important case for binary stars. Additionally, the OSPE and MVS results show similar peaks in the maximum induced eccentricity around the resonance between the quadrupole and octupole terms. Both MVS and limited BS integrations also indicate that the vanishing of the induced eccentricity for low-inclination systems when m0 = m1 is real. (Unfortunately, these systems are very time-consuming to integrate numerically with a BS integrator, prohibiting us from doing a more thorough investigation.) For example, for the initial conditions m0 = m1 = m2, e1 = e2 = 0, α−1 = 100, and i = 0, we observed only short-term eccentricity fluctuations of magnitude ∼ 10−12. Thus, we conclude that the OSPE results are accurate for all values of the inner mass ratio m1/(m0 + m1). -- 29 -- Fig. 11. -- Maximum e1 as a function of the initial outer eccentricity, e2, for a system with m1/m0 = 10−3, m2/m0 = 0.01, and initial e1 = 10−5. For e2 < 0.6 we used α−1 = 100 as in previous figures, while for e2 > 0.6 we increased the value to α−1 = 300 (to avoid close interactions with m2). The symbols and line styles are as in Fig. 9. -- 30 -- Fig. 12. -- Maximum e1 as a function of the mass of the outer body, m2, for a system with m1/m0 = 10−3, α−1 = 100, and initial eccentricities e1 = 10−5 and e2 = 0.05. The symbols and line styles are as in Fig. 9. -- 31 -- Fig. 13. -- Maximum e1 as a function of the mass ratio of the inner binary, m1/(m0 + m1), for a system with the same parameters as in Fig. 12. The symbols and line styles are as in Fig. 9. -- 32 -- 3.7. Summary and Discussion We have performed a large number of numerical integrations (including many not shown here) to establish the validity of our analytic results for a broad range of triple configurations. The only significant difference we observed was in the regime where e1 ≃ 0. In that regime the system will chaotically choose circulation or libration about an island in the (e1, g1) phase space. Since e1 = 0 creates a singularity in the OSPE, we circumvented this problem by starting runs with e1 = 10−5. While varying the timestep affected when m1 chose to librate or circulate, it did not create any significant difference in the ratio of circulation to libration time. We conclude that the OSPE provide an accurate description of the secular evolution of hierarchical triple systems (containing unevolving point masses and in Newtonian gravity) for nearly all inclinations, initial eccentricities, and mass ratios. The OSPE may be used for small e1, provided that e1 6= 0, since this can be unstable to large oscillations. When secular perturbations are sufficiently small, short-period perturbations may provide the larger contribution to the eccentricity oscillations. The OSPE are not applicable when m0/m2 < α ≡ a1/a2, since the inner orbit is then no longer nearly-Keplerian. The OSPE also break down whenever a2(1− e2)/a1(1+ e1) <∼ 3− 5, since the triple system is then likely unstable and its evolution will not be dominated by secular effects. Similarly, the OSPE should not be applied when a1(1 − e1) <∼ R0, where R0 is the radius of the larger of the two inner stars, since the tidal interaction with that star would then be important. One should also be careful whenever e1 ≃ 1, since a small fractional error in e1 can lead to a significant change in rp,1 ≡ a1(1− e1) which is important in differentiating purely gravitational interactions from a strongly dissipative tidal encounter or collision between the inner components. 4. Resonant Perturbations: The Case of PSR B1620−26 4.1. Introduction Hierarchical triple systems can be affected by many different types of perturbations acting on secular timescales. In general, during a given phase in the evolution of a triple, only one type of perturbation will be important. However, it is possible that, in some cases, two perturbation mechanisms with different physical origins may be acting simultaneously and combine in a nontrivial manner. In particular, whenever two perturbations are acting on comparable timescales, the possibility exists that they will reinforce each other in a nonlinear way, leading to a kind of resonant amplification. This is not to be confused with orbital resonances, which can lead to nonlinear perturbations of two tightly coupled Keplerian orbits when the ratio of orbital periods is close to a ratio of small integers (see, e.g., Peale 1976) Perturbation effects coming from the stellar evolution of the components or from tidal dissipation in the inner binary were mentioned briefly in §1 and will not be discussed extensively -- 33 -- in this paper. Instead, we consider the case where the inner binary contains compact objects and its orbit is affected by general relativistic corrections on a timescale comparable to that of the Newtonian secular perturbations calculated in §2. Rather than basing our discussion on hypothetical cases, we concentrate on the real example provided by the PSR B1620−26 system. 4.2. The PSR B1620−26 Triple System PSR B1620−26 is a millisecond radio pulsar in a triple system, located near the core of the globular cluster M4. The inner binary consists of a ≃ 1.4 M⊙ neutron star with a ≃ 0.3 M⊙ white-dwarf companion in a 191-day orbit with an eccentricity of 0.025. The mass and orbital parameters of the third body are less certain, since the duration of the radio observations covers only a small fraction of the outer period. However, from the modeling of the pulse frequency derivatives as well as short-term orbital perturbation effects it appears that the second companion is most likely a low-mass object (m2 ≃ 0.01 M⊙) in a wide orbit of semimajor axis a2 ≃ 50 AU (orbital period P2 ≃ 300 yr) and eccentricity e2 ≃ 0.45 (Joshi & Rasio 1997; Ford et al. 2000). The eccentricity of the inner binary, although small, is several orders of magnitude larger than expected for a binary millisecond pulsar of this type, raising the possibility that it may have been produced by long-term secular perturbations in the triple. An analysis based on the classical planetary theory (i.e., for small relative inclination ignoring general relativistic precession) shows that a second companion of stellar mass would be necessary to induce an eccentricity as large as 0.025 in the inner binary (Rasio 1994, 1995). Such a large mass for the second companion has now been ruled out by recent pulsar timing data, and by the absence of an optical counterpart for the system (Ford et al. 2000). It is reasonable to assume that the relative inclination is large, since the location of the system near the core of a dense globular cluster suggests that the triple was formed through a dynamical interaction between binaries (Rasio, McMillan, & Hut 1995; Ford et al. 2000). For a sufficiently large relative inclination, we have seen (Fig. 6) that it should always be possible to induce an arbitrarily large eccentricity in the inner binary. Therefore, this would seem to provide a natural explanation for the anomalously high eccentricity of the binary pulsar in the PSR B1620−26 system (Rasio, Ford, & Kozinsky 1997). However, there are two additional conditions that must be satisfied for this explanation to hold. First, the timescale for reaching a high eccentricity must be shorter than the lifetime of the triple system. In this case the lifetime of the triple is determined by the timescale for encounters with passing stars in the cluster, since any such encounter is likely to disrupt the orbit of the (very weakly bound) second companion. As discussed in detail by Ford et al. (2000), this is unlikely to be the case in the high-inclination regime of secular perturbations, given the parameters of PSR B1620−26 and its location near the core of M4 (or inside -- it is seen just inside the edge of the core in projection). -- 34 -- Second, the secular perturbation of the inner binary pulsar by its distant second companion must be the dominant source of orbital perturbation. Additional perturbations that alter the longitude of periastron of the inner binary can indirectly affect the evolution of its eccentricity. For a binary pulsar, general relativity contributes a significant orbital perturbation. If the additional precession of periastron induced by general relativity is much slower than the precession due to the Newtonian secular perturbations, then the eccentricity oscillations should not be significantly affected. However, if the additional precession is faster than the secular perturbations, then eccentricity oscillations may be severely damped (Holman et al. 1997; Lin et al. 1998). In addition, if the two precession periods are comparable, then a type of resonance could occur, leading to a significant increase in the eccentricity perturbation. 4.3. Secular Evolution of the Eccentricity We have used the OSPE to study the secular evolution of the inner binary eccentricity in the PSR B1620−26 system. We integrate the system using the variables h1, h2, k1, k2 (eqs. 38 & 39), which makes it easy to incorporate the first-order post-Newtonian correction. We restrict our attention to the one-parameter family of orbital solutions calculated by Ford et al. (2000), based on the modeling of the four pulse frequency derivatives measured by Thorsett et al. (1999). For each solution, the maximum induced eccentricity of the inner orbit depends only on the (unknown) relative inclination of the two orbits. In Figure 14, we show this maximum induced eccentricity as a function of the second companion's semimajor axis for several inclinations. For most solutions and most values of the inclination, the maximum induced eccentricity remains significantly smaller than the observed value of 0.025. However, for low enough inclinations, there is a narrow range of solutions (around a2 ≃ 45) for which the observed value can be reached. Most remarkably, these solutions are also the ones currently preferred if one takes into account preliminary measurements of the fifth pulse derivative and short-term orbital perturbation effects in the theoretical modeling (see Ford et al. 2000). We also see from Figure 14 that the maximum induced eccentricity has a peak where the precession period due to the secular perturbation of the second companion is comparable to the precession period due to general relativity, as expected. As the inclination increases, the maximum induced eccentricity (at the peak) becomes smaller and the peak moves towards lower values of a2. This pattern continues for inclinations slightly larger the normal cutoff for the low-inclination limit (≃ 40◦). For relative inclinations 50◦ <∼ i <∼ 70◦ we do not find a peak in the maximum induced eccentricity. For inclinations >∼ 75◦ we again find a peak, which becomes smaller and moves towards larger separations as the relative inclination of the two orbits is increased. The maximum inner eccentricity is also limited in this case by the relatively short lifetime of the triple system in M4, ∼ 107 − 109 yr depending on whether the system resides inside or outside the cluster core (Ford et al. 2000). For solutions near a resonance, the inner eccentricity starts growing linearly at nearly the same rate as it would without general relativistic perturbations. -- 35 -- Fig. 14. -- The top panel compares several timescales in the PSR B1620−26 binary pulsar as a function of the semimajor axis, a2, of its second companion: PGR is the general relativistic precession period of the inner binary; PHigh i and PLow i are the periods of the eccentricity oscillations in the high and low relative inclination regimes, respectively; τc and τhm are the expected lifetimes of the triple in the core of M4 and at the half-mass radius, respectively. The bottom panel shows the maximum induced eccentricity of the inner binary for several different values of the (unknown) relative inclination. The peaks correspond to a resonance between the general relativistic precession of the inner orbit and the Newtonian secular perturbation by the second companion. -- 36 -- However the period of the eccentricity oscillations can be many times the period of the classical eccentricity oscillations. Although this allows the eccentricity to grow to a larger value, the timescale for this growth is also longer. For PSR B1620−26, Ford et al. (2000) show that, near resonance, the inner binary achieves an eccentricity of 0.025 in a time comparable to the expected lifetime of the triple in the core of M4. However, the location of the pulsar near the edge of the core (in projection) suggests that it may in fact reside well outside the cluster core, where its lifetime can be significantly longer. In summary, the resonance between general relativistic precession and Newtonian secular perturbations by the outer companion provides a possible explanation for the inner binary's eccentricity. 4.4. Comparison with Direct Numerical Integrations We have conducted a few long integrations with our MVS symplectic integrator for model systems similar to PSR B1620−26, in order to check the validity of the OSPE in the presence of a resonance (Fig. 15). Although there is good overall agreement, we find that both the amplitude and the width of the peak is slightly narrower in the MVS integrations. Note that the values of the masses and semimajor axes were decreased in order to speed up the direct integrations and to satisfy the assumptions of the well-tested MVS integrator provided in SWIFT (i.e., m1 ≪ m0 and m2 ≪ m0). This results in smaller values for the ratio of semimajor axes, implying less accurate results from the OSPE. Nevertheless, the OSPE integrator performs well, even near a resonance such as the one produced by general relativistic precession in a system like the PSR B1620−26 triple. 5. Application to Other Observed Triples 5.1. The 16 Cygni Binary and its Planet The 16 Cyg system contains two solar-like main-sequence stars in a wide orbit (separation ∼ 103 AU) and a low-mass companion orbiting 16 Cyg B in a 2.2-yr (∼ 1.7 AU) eccentric orbit (e = 0.67). The amplitude of the observed radial velocity variations indicate that the low-mass companion has a mass m sin i ≃ 0.6MJup, suggesting that it is a giant planet (Cochran et al. 1997). However the large orbital eccentricity is surprising for a planet. Holman et al. (1997) and Mazeh et al. (1997) pointed out that the secular perturbation by 16 Cyg A could explain the large eccentricity of the planetary orbit for a sufficiently large relative inclination. In order for the quadrupole perturbations to be effective the precession of the longitude of periastron must be dominated by the secular perturbations of 16 Cyg A. The general relativistic precession period (∼ 7 × 107 yr) can be significant in the eccentricity evolution of the planet (Holman et al. 1997). Similarly, if additional companions to 16 Cyg B are found in -- 37 -- Fig. 15. -- Maximum induced eccentricity e1 as a function of the ratio of semimajor axes, α−1 = a2/a1. The different symbols show the results of numerical integrations with and without the general relativistic term, using both OSPE and MVS integrators: MVS integrations are shown by squares, OSPE integrations are shown by triangles, integrations which include general relativistic precession are indicated by empty symbols, integrations which ignore GR are shown with solid symbols. These results are for a system similar to PSR B1620−26, but with the masses and semimajor axes altered to facilitate the numerical integrations: m0 = 1.4 M⊙, m1 = 5 × 10−3 M⊙, m2 = 8 × 10−4 M⊙, e1,init = 10−4, e2,init = 0.193, a1 = 2 × 10−4 AU, and i = 0◦. -- 38 -- larger orbits (like those recently detected around Upsilon Andromedae; see Butler et al. 1999), these would also induce a secular change in the longitude of pericenter of the presently known planet. Thus, additional companions could also affect the eccentricity generated by the influence of 16 Cyg A. Such an interaction could prevent the quadrupolar secular perturbation by 16 Cyg A from accumulating long enough to produce the observed large eccentricity. Hauser & Marcy (1999) have combined radial velocity and astrometric data to compute a one-parameter family of solutions, which they tabulate as a function of the line-of-sight component z of the position vector of B relative to A. There is also a possibility that 16 Cyg A may have an M-dwarf companion which would affect the orbital solutions for the 16 Cyg AB binary and hence the secular perturbation timescale (Hauser & Marcy 1999). We have used their orbital solutions for 16 Cyg A (with no M dwarf companion) to estimate the effects of secular perturbations in this system. If we assume that the eccentricity of 16 Cyg Bb is due to quadrupolar secular perturbations, then both general relativity and any additional planets around 16 Cyg B could constrain the orbit of the 16 Cyg AB binary. In Figure 16 we compare timescales for eccentricity oscillations induced by 16 Cyg A, general relativistic precession, as well as the eccentricity oscillations induced by a hypothetical second planet around 16 Cyg B. While the period of eccentricity oscillations is shorter than 5 Gyr (the approximate age of 16 Cyg A&B; see Ford, Rasio, & Sills 1998, 2000) for about 75% of the orbital solutions listed by Hauser & Marcy (1999; we actually used an extended version of their Table 4 kindly provided by H. Hauser), the period of the eccentricity oscillations is shorter than the general relativistic precession period for only about 25% of their solutions (assuming sin i ≃ 1; with sin i ≃ 0.5 this fraction increases to about 60%). Given the large mass ratio of 16 Cyg A to 16 Cyg Bb and the high eccentricity of the orbit (> 0.53), the ratio C3/C2 (see Eq. 23 & 24) can approach unity. Thus, the octupole term can be very significant in the dynamics of this system on sufficiently long timescales. As an example, we use the z = 0 solution of Hauser & Marcy (1999) and assume that the planet was initially on a nearly circular orbit with an initial relative inclination of 60◦. We find that the period of eccentricity oscillations is then ∼ 3 × 107 yr (∼ 4 × 107 yr if general relativistic precession is not included; ∼ 6 × 107 yr if neither general relativistic precession nor the octupole term is included) and the amplitude of the first eccentricity oscillation is ≃ 0.685 (≃ 0.767 without GR; ≃ 0.764 without GR or octupole term). However, there is a longer term oscillation with a period of ∼ 7 × 108 yr and an amplitude of 0.766 (≃ 0.774 without GR) which is not present when the octupole term is ignored. Thus, in this example, the primary effect of general relativistic precession is to reduce the fraction of the time where the planet has a very high eccentricity. 5.2. The Protobinary System TMR-1 HST/NICMOS observations of the TMR-1 system by Terebey et al. (1998) reveal, in addition to the two protostars (of masses ∼ 0.5 M⊙) with a projected separation of 42 AU, a faint third body (TMR-1C) that appears to have been recently ejected from the system. The association -- 39 -- Fig. 16. -- This plot compares the timescales for precession of the longitude of pericenter of the planet around 16 Cyg B due to the secular perturbations by 16 Cyg A (PA,High−i and PA,Low−i for high and low relative inclination regimes, respectively), general relativity (PGR), and secular perturbations by a hypothetical second planet (PBc), assuming that it is coplanar with 16 Cyg Bb and has a mass of 1 MJup. Note that PA,High−i, PA,Low−i and PGR are plotted as a function of the binary semimajor axis, while PBc is shown as a function of the orbital radius of the additional planet. PA,High−i and PA,Low−i were calculated for the one-parameter family of orbital solutions given by Hauser & Marcy (1999), which do not extend below a ≃ 900 AU. τms indicates the age of 16 Cyg B. -- 40 -- of TMR1-C with the protobinary is suggested by a long, narrow filament that seems to connect the protobinary to the faint companion. Given the observed luminosity of TMR1-C, and using evolutionary models for young, low-mass objects, the estimated age of ∼ 3 × 105 yr for the system leads to a mass estimate of ∼ 2 − 5MJup. This suggests that the object may be a planet that was formed in orbit around one of the two protostars, and later ejected from the system (Terebey et al. 1998). If the age were increased to ∼ 107 yr, the mass would increase to ∼ 15 MJup, and TMR1-C could also have been a low-mass, brown dwarf companion to one of the stars. If TMR-1C is indeed a planet that was ejected from the binary system, this may place significant constraints on planet formation theory. Here we speculate about the process which may have led to the ejection of a planet from the TMR-1 system. In the standard planet formation theory, TMR-1C must have formed in a nearly circular orbit around one of the protostars. Secular perturbations by the other protostar may then have driven a gradual increase in the eccentricity of the planet's orbit, gradually pushing the system towards instability. Large apocentre distances render perturbations by the other protostar increasingly important. The planet could then enter the chaotic regime in which it can switch into an orbit around the other protostar, possibly switching between stars many times before finally being ejected from the system. The expected velocity after such an ejection is in agreement with the estimated velocity of TMR-1C (de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 1998). One concern with this scenario is that the timescale for ejection may be short compared to the timescale for planet formation. Early in the evolution the protostellar disk will damp the planet's eccentricity. However, as the planet becomes more massive, the gravitational perturbation by the other protostar becomes dominant. In fact, after the protoplanetary core has formed, it may be able to accrete more mass than in the standard scenario, since it is no longer confined to accrete from a narrow feeding zone. We have investigated systems similar to TMR-1, but with the low mass companion in a nearly circular orbit around one of the stars. We assume that the two protostars have masses of 1 M⊙ and 0.5 M⊙, with a binary semimajor axis of 50 AU and a planet mass of 5 MJup. We estimate when the triple system will become unstable by combining our models of the secular eccentricity evolution of the binary with the stability criterion of Eggleton & Kiseleva (1995). We calculate the amplitude of secular eccentricity perturbations and see if the system would violate the Eggleton & Kiseleva (1995) instability criterion (Y ≡ a2(1 − e2)/a1(1 + e1) < Ymin) when the planet's orbit reaches its maximum eccentricity. For orbits with a large relative inclination, planetary semimajor axes from 14 AU to 8 AU are expected to become unstable as the relative inclination is varied from 40◦ to 85◦. For nearly coplanar orbits, planetary semimajor axes from 16 AU to 3 AU will become unstable according to this criterion, as the outer eccentricity is varied from 0 to 0.8. Thus, it seems plausible that a protoplanet could begin to form near the critical semimajor axis and eventually be ejected from the system after it has accreted a large amount of gas. If we assume the initial semimajor axis of the planet to be 5 AU, then we can solve for a critical binary eccentricity, which we find to be 0.65. The period of the eccentricity oscillations responsible for reducing the instability parameter from ≃ 10 to ≃ 3 is about 3 × 104 yr. In the coplanar regime we can also -- 41 -- apply the stability criteria of Holman & Wiegert (1999)4. As the eccentricity of the TMR-1 binary increases from 0 to 0.8, the critical semimajor axis decreases from about 11 AU to 2 AU. This is precisely the region where giant planets are expected to form. If we assume the initial semimajor axis of the planet to be 5 AU, then we can again solve for a critical binary eccentricity, which we find to be 0.48. The two estimates are in reasonable agreement, and both also agree with the results of preliminary numerical simulations which we have performed for this system. We have conducted Monte Carlo simulations to study the process of planet ejection from protobinaries (Fig. 17). For systems with large inclinations, the most common outcome for unstable systems is a collision of the planet with its parent star. However, for systems with a low relative inclination, the most common outcome was for the planet to be ejected from the system. Furthermore, we found that in many cases it can take up to ∼ 107 yr for the planet to be ejected. Since this is longer than a typical planetary formation timescale, the scenario proposed above appears reasonable. 5.3. Systems with Short-Period Inner Binaries Finally, we discuss briefly some observations and related theoretical work on triple systems containing a short-period inner binary. be possible to observe the secular perturbations directly, since the timescale for eccentricity modulations and orbital precession may become comparable to the timescale of observations. Unfortunately, in these systems, other perturbation effects such as tidal dissipation are likely to affect the secular evolution, making the theoretical analysis more difficult. If the outer period is also relatively short, it may 5.3.1. HD 109648 HD 109648 is a triple-lined spectroscopic triple probably composed of three main-sequence stars all with masses ∼ 1 M⊙ (Jha et al. 1999). The inner orbit has a short period, ≃ 5.5 d, so tidal dissipation effects are likely to be important. The small but significant eccentricity (e1 = 0.0119 ± 0.0014) of the inner orbit has been attributed to the perturbation by the outer companion (Jha et al. 1999). This system is strongly coupled, with α ≃ 0.1, so the timescale for eccentricity modulations is short, Pe ∼ 15 yr. Thus, the available observations, spanning over 8 years, may already have detected changes in the inner eccentricity and longitude of pericenter. Theoretical models by Jha et al. (1999) based on current data provide a loose constraint on the 4They define the critical semimajor axis as the largest orbital radius for which planets of all initial longitudes of periastron survived for 104 binary periods. This is different from the criterion obtained by combining secular perturbation theory with the results of Eggleton & Kisseleva (1995). However both criteria provide an estimate of when the triple system becomes unstable. It is reassuring that both criteria yield similar results. -- 42 -- Fig. 17. -- Results of Monte Carlo simulations for the dynamical evolution of possible progenitor systems of TMR-1. The systems contain a 5 MJup planet in an initially circular 10 AU orbit around a 1M⊙ star with a 0.5 M⊙ companion star in a 50 AU orbit. All other orbital parameters (initial phases, longitudes of pericenter, relative inclination, and binary eccentricity) were assigned random values. Triangles correspond to cases in which the planet was ejected (escaped) and squares correspond to cases in which the planet collided with one of the stars. The time to ejection (triangles) or collision (squares) is shown as a function of the initial stability parameter Y ≡ a2 (1 − e2)/a1. -- 43 -- relative inclination of the orbits: 5.9◦ ≤ i ≤ 54◦ or 126◦ ≤ i ≤ 174.1◦. Future observations are likely to produce tighter constraints on this and other orbital parameters for the triple system. However, Jha et al. (1999) speculate that additional variations may also be caused by the presence of a fourth object in a much wider orbit. 5.3.2. HD 284163 HD 284163 is a triple system in the Hyades. The inner binary consists of a 0.72 M⊙ primary and a secondary with a minimum mass of 0.33 M⊙ in a 2.4-day orbit (Griffin & Gunn 1981; Ford & Rasio 2000). The outer companion (of mass ∼ 0.5 M⊙) has a projected separation of 7.4 AU (Patience et al. 1998). Theoretical and empirical evidence indicate that tidal dissipation in the primary should have circularized the inner binary (Ford & Rasio 2000). However, the radial velocity curves indicate a significant eccentricity, e1 = 0.057 ± 0.005 (Griffin & Gunn 1981). The secular perturbation by the outer companion is likely responsible for inducing this observed eccentricity. At present, however, the outer orbit is not well constrained, making further analysis difficult. 5.3.3. β Per This is another triple system with a short-period (2.87 d) inner binary (1.7 M⊙ + 3.7 M⊙) which is expected to have a very nearly circular orbit on the basis of tidal dissipation theory, but has a significantly larger observed eccentricity of 0.0653. Secular perturbations by the outer companion (mass 1.7 M⊙ in a 1.86-yr orbit) are likely responsible for maintaining the inner binary's eccentricity (Kisseleva et al. 1998). Kisseleva et al. (1998) suggest that the inner binary may have originally been significantly wider. In their scenario, quadrupole perturbations drive a eccentricity increase. As the eccentricity increases, tidal dissipation becomes significant and removes energy from the orbit. As the orbit shrinks, precession of the longitude of periastron due to the stellar quadrupole moments and general relativity increase, eventually suppressing the eccentricity perturbations. The secular decrease in the semimajor axis due to the coupling of quadrupole perturbations and tidal dissipation is then halted near the presently observed orbit. In this system the ratio of semimajor axes is rather small, ≃ 40. Thus the octupole-level perturbations could play an important role in the secular evolution. In particular, this could lead to significantly larger eccentricities in the initial orbit if other effects have not yet started to suppress the perturbations. Thus, the range of initial conditions that could lead to such an evolution can be much larger than would be expected by considering quadrupole-level perturbations only. -- 44 -- We are grateful to M. Holman and J. Wisdom for providing us with a version of their MVS integrator modified for systems with more than one massive body, and to H. Hauser for sending us an extended table of orbital solutions for the 16 Cygni binary. We thank S. Jha for pointing out to us the recent theoretical work of Krymolowski and Mazeh and for providing us with a draft of his paper on HD 109648 in advance of publication. Some of the numerical simulations mentioned in §5.2 for TMR-1 were performed at MIT by J. Madic. F.A.R. thanks the Theory Division of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics for hospitality. This work was supported in part by NSF Grant AST-9618116 and NASA ATP Grant NAG5-8460. E.B.F. was supported in part by the Orloff UROP Fund and the UROP program at MIT. F.A.R. was supported in part by an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship. This work was supported by the National Computational Science Alliance under Grant AST980014N and utilized the SGI/Cray Origin2000 supercomputer at Boston University and the Condor system at the University of Wisconsin. -- 45 -- REFERENCES Anosova, J. 1996, Ap&SS, 238, 223 Bailyn, C.D., & Grindlay, J.E. 1987, ApJ, 312, 748 Backer, D.C. 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 36, Planets around Pulsars, ed. Phillips J.A. et al. (San Francisco: ASP), 11 Brower, D., & Clemence, G.M. 1961, Methods of Celestial Mechanics (New York: Academic) Brown, E.W. 1936, MNRAS, 97, 116 Butler, R.P., Marcy, G.W., Fischer, D.A., Brown, T.W., Contos, A.R., Korzennik, S.G., Nisenson, P., & Noyes, R. 1999, ApJ, submitted Cochran, W.D., Hatzes, A.P., Butler, R.P., & Marcy, G.W. 1997, ApJ, 483, 457 de la Fuente Marcos, C. & de la Fuente Marcos, R. 1998, NewA, 4, 21 Dermott, S.F., & Nicholson, P.D. 1986, Nature, 319, 115 Eggleton, P. 2000, Evolutionary Processes in Binary and Multiple Star Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), in preparation Eggleton, P., & Kiseleva, L. 1995, ApJ, 455, 640 Eggleton, P.P., & Verbunt, F. 1986, MNRAS, 220, 13P Ford, E.B., Joshi, K.J., Rasio, F.A., & Zbarsky, B. 2000, ApJ, in press (January 1) Ford, E.B., Rasio, F.A., & Sills, A.S. 1998, ApJ, 514, 411 Ford, E.B., Rasio, F.A., & Sills, A.S. 2000, in preparation Ford, E.B., & Rasio, F.A. 2000, in preparation Georgakarakos, N. 2000, in preparation Gies, D.R., & Bolton, C.T. 1986, ApJS, 61, 419 Goldstein, H. 1980, Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley Griffin, R.F. & Gunn, J.E. 1981, ApJ, 86, 588 Hagihara, Y. 1972, Celestial Mechanics Vol. II, Part 2, MIT Press Harrington, R.S. 1968, AJ, 73, 190 Harrington, R.S. 1969, Celes. Mech., 1, 200 Hauser, H.M. & Marcy, G.W. 1999, PASP, 111, 32 Heggie, D.C. 1975, MNRAS, 173, 729 Heggie, D.C. & Rasio, F.A. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1064 Holman, M., Touma, J. & Tremaine, S. 1997, Nature, 386, 254 Holman, M.J., & Wiegert, P.A. 1999, AJ, 117, 621 -- 46 -- Iben, I., Jr., & Tutukov, A.V. 1999, ApJ, 511, 324 Jeffrys, W.H., & Moser, J. 1966, AJ, 71, 568 Jha, S., Torres, G., Stefanik, R.P., Latham, D.W., & Mazeh, T. 1999, in preparation Joshi, K.J. & Rasio, F.A. 1997, ApJ, 479, 948 Kevorkian, J. 1966, AJ, 71, 878 Kiseleva, L.G., Eggleton, P.P., & Mikkola, S. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 292 Kozai, Y., 1962, AJ, 67, 591 Krymolowski, Y., & Mazeh, T. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 720 Levison, H. & Duncan, M. 1991, Icarus, 108, 18L Lin, D.N.C., Papaloizou, J.C.B., Bryden, G., Ida, S., & Terquem, C. 1998, to be published in Protostars and Planets IV, eds. A. Boss, V. Mannings, & S. Russell [astro-ph/9809200] Lyne, A.G., Biggs, J.D., Brinklow, A., Ashworth, M., & McKenna, J. 1988, Nature, 332, 45 Marchal, C. 1990, The Three-Body Problem, (Amsterdam: Elsevier) Mathieu, R.D., & Mazeh, T. 1988, ApJ, 326, 256 Mazeh, T., Kymolowski, Y., & Rosenfeld, G. 1996, ApJ, 477, L103 Mazeh, T., & Shaham, J. 1979, A&A, 77, 145 McKenna, J., & Lyne, A.G. 1988, Nature, 336, 226; erratum, 336, 698 McMillan, S., Hut, P., & Makino, J. 1991, ApJ, 372, 111 Mikkola, S. 1997, CeMDA, 68, 87 Mikkola, S., & Tanikawa, K. 1998, AJ, 116, 444 Patience, J., Ghez, A.M., Reid, I.N., Weinberger, A.J., & Matthews, K. 1998, AJ, 115, 1972 Peale, S.J. 1976, ARA&A, 14, 215 Portegies Zwart, S.F., Hut, P., McMillan, S.L.W., Verbunt, F. 1997, A&A, 328, 143 Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P. 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing (New York: Cambridge University Press) Rasio, F.A. 1994, ApJ, 427, L107 Rasio, F.A. 1995, in Millisecond Pulsars: A Decade of Surprise, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 72. Eds. A.S. Fruchter, M. Tavani, & D.C. Backer (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco), 424 Rasio, F.A., McMillan, S., & Hut, P. 1995, ApJ, 438, L33 Rasio, F.A., Ford, E.B., & Kozinsky, B. 1997, AAS Meeting 191, 44.16 Soderhjelm, S., 1984, A&A, 141, 232 -- 47 -- Terebey, S., Van Buren, D., Padgett, D.L., Hancock, T., & Brundage, M. 1998, ApJ, 507, L71 Thorsett, S.E., Arzoumanian, Z., Camilo, F., & Lyne, A.G. 1999, ApJ, 523, 763 Tokovinin, A.A. 1997a, AstL, 23, 727 Tokovinin, A.A. 1997b, A&AS, 124, 75 Wisdom, J., & Holman, M. 1991, AJ102, 1528 Zahn, J.-P. 1977, A&A, 57, 383; erratum 67, 162 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0.
astro-ph/0107462	2	0107	2001-11-15T16:13:46	Ambipolar Drift in a Turbulent Medium	[ "astro-ph" ]	The interstellar magnetic field strength and gas density are observed to be correlated, but there is a large dispersion in this relation. In particular, the magnetic field is often observed to be weaker than expected. It is usually assumed that the field is frozen into the gas, except at very low ionization fraction, in which case ion-neutral drift, or ambipolar diffusion, leads to appreciable slip of the field and tends to make it more uniform. We show that turbulence enhances the rate of ambipolar drift, and that this may explain the surprisingly low fieldstrengths sometimes seen in dense interstellar gas.	astro-ph	astro-ph	To appear in Astrophys J. March 10, 2002 Ambipolar Drift in a Turbulent Medium Ellen G. Zweibel JILA & Department of Astrophysical & Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309 ABSTRACT The interstellar magnetic field strength and density are observed to be correlated, but there is a large dispersion in this relation. In particular, the magnetic field is often observed to be weaker than expected. At low ionization fraction, ion-neutral drift, or ambipolar diffusion, permits slip of the field relative to the neutral gas and tends to make the field strength more uniform, but is thought to be too slow to explain the obser- vations. The purpose of this paper is to show that ion-neutral drift is significantly faster in a turbulent medium than in a quiescent one. We suggest that this fast ambipolar diffusion can explain the surprisingly low magnetic fieldstrengths sometimes observed in dense interstellar gas. Subject headings: ISM: magnetic fields, turbulence, MHD 1. Introduction The interstellar magnetic fieldstrength and gas density are observed to be correlated (Troland & Heiles 1986, Crutcher 1999). This relationship is thought to arise from so-called ideal magne- tohydrodynamic (MHD) processes, in which the field is frozen to the ambient medium. Under ideal MHD conditions, if the ratio of mass to magnetic flux were everywhere constant, the slope q ≡ d log B/d log ρ of the fieldstrength - density correlation would be unity for compression normal to B, zero for compression parallel to B, and 2/3 for isotropic compression. The observed value of q is approximately 0.5, which is consistent with equilibrium models of self gravitating clouds which evolved under conditions of frozen flux (Mouschovias 1976, Tomisaka, Ikeuchi, & Nakamura 1988). However, a number of observations and upper limits on magnetic fieldstrength suggest that B ∝ ρ0.5 is more an upper envelope than a scaling law. This is true both in atomic and molecular gas (Bourke et al. 2001, Crutcher 1999, Heiles 2001a, Heiles & Troland 2001) Although the number of measurements is small, and the field may be underresolved in some cases (Brogan & Troland 2001), the trend towards weak fields is clear. A different line of argument comes from numerical simulations of molecular clouds: Padoan & Nordlund (1999) claim that models with weak fields replicate the observations better than models with strong fields. -- 2 -- Weak fields are difficult to reconcile with ideal MHD. This is particularly so in the case of turbulent molecular clouds. Giant molecular clouds (GMCs) are about 40 times more dense than the mean interstellar gas, suggesting that the magnetic field should be 6-7 times stronger than the mean field. If GMCs are formed by flows parallel to the field then of course the field would not be strengthened, but the mean field is not strong enough to resist compression and collimate the flows. Furthermore, Mestel (1985) has pointed out that accumulation of the mass of a GMC by compression in one dimension requires organized motion of the gas over nearly one kiloparsec, the origin of which is difficult to understand. Thus, we seek an explanation for the weakness of the magnetic fieldstrength - gas density correlation beyond the scope of ideal MHD. At the very largest lengthscales, ideal MHD should be an excellent approximation. Moving downwards in scale, the first non-ideal effect encountered, at least at low ionization fraction, is ion-neutral drift, or ambipolar diffusion. At the ambipolar scale, which is many orders of magnitude larger than the resistive scale, the magnetic field and plasma become decoupled from the neutral material. This makes it possible to change the mass to flux ratio without altering the magnetic topology. Ambipolar drift has been invoked as the primary magnetic flux transport mechanism in dense, star forming gas since the classic paper by Mestel & Spitzer (1956). However, it is thought to be too slow to be an effective transport mechanism in diffuse gas (see §2 for quantitative estimates). Interstellar gas is turbulent. Turbulent diffusion of quantities such as heat and angular mo- mentum is often invoked in astrophysics as a mechanism for enhancing transport rates above their kinetic theory values, which are usually very slow. Turbulence enhances diffusion rates by mix- ing the relevant quantity to the small scales at which molecular diffusion operates. This leads to a mixing time which is approximately the eddy turnover time, and is nearly independent of the molecular diffusivity. Whether turbulence enhances the resistive decay rate of a magnetic field is unclear, because there is substantial evidence that magnetic forces resist stretching the field sufficiently to mix it to the tiny scales at which resistivity operates (Cattaneo & Vainshtein 1991, Cattaneo 1994, Cattaneo, Hughes, & Kim 1996). This paper addresses a different question, namely, whether turbulence in a weakly ionized gas can transport magnetic field with respect to the neutral matter, without resistive dissipation necessarily coming into play. Because the ambipolar drift scale is much larger than the resistive scale, the feedback effects which can suppress turbulent resistivity are far less dramatic, although they cannot always be ignored. We use analytical methods to calculate the mixing rate. Numerical study of mixing requires that numerical diffusion of both field and fluid be very well controlled. Analytical calculations are useful for initial exploration of some of the basic mechanisms. In §2, we introduce the physical model, derive an equation for the evolution of the mass to magnetic flux ratio in a weakly ionized medium, estimate relevant timescales, and establish an initial condition. In §3, we estimate the turbulent diffusion rate based on mixing length theory, -- 3 -- quantify this estimate with an exact calculation of transport by a wave, and argue that enhanced diffusion requires the introduction of small scales as well as bulk advection. In §4 we develop a model based on exponential stretching and shrinking. This model leads to a flux redistribution rate which is comparable to the eddy turnover rate, as expected in turbulent diffusion problems. However, the model is two dimensional, and the fluid motions are prescribed without specifically allowing for magnetic forces. In §5, we consider magnetic feedback. In §6, we apply the model to the interstellar medium, and discuss the astrophysical constraints imposed by the dynamics. Section 7 is a summary and conclusion. Sections 3 and 4 are relevant to general mixing problems, such as turbulent diffusion of a passive scalar, and the reader who is mainly interested in the astrophysical implications could go directly to §6. 2. Basic Equations and Model 2.1. Equations for Ambipolar Drift We consider a weakly ionized medium with magnetic field B, mass density ρ, and ion mass density ρi ≪ ρ. We are interested in timescales much longer than the ion-neutral collision time τin, in which case the ion-neutral drift vD ≡ vi − vn is well approximated by vD = (∇ × B)×B 4πρi τin, (1) (Shu 1983). The magnetic field evolves according to the magnetic induction equation for a perfectly con- ducting medium ∂B ∂t = ∇ × (vi × B), (2) Replacing vi with vD + vn, and approximating vn by the center of mass velocity v, we rewrite the induction equation as ∂B ∂t = ∇ × (v × B) + ∇ × (vD × B), (3) where vD is given by eqn. (1). The first term on the RHS of eqn. (3) can be expanded using the identity ∇ × (v × B) = B · ∇v − v · ∇B − B∇ · v. Then, using the continuity equation ∂ρ ∂t = −v · ∇ρ − ρ∇ · v we derive an evolution equation for the magnetic field to density ratio B/ρ ∂ ∂t B ρ + v · ∇ B ρ = B ρ · ∇v + 1 ρ∇ × (vD × B). (4) (5) The left hand side of eqn. (5) is the comoving, or convective, time derivative of B/ρ. The first term on the right hand side represents stretching of the fieldlines, and is a consequence of the frozen -- 4 -- flux condition. The second term on the right hand side represents the evolution of B/ρ caused by ambipolar drift. We now restrict ourselves to two dimensional, incompressible flows perpendicular to a straight magnetic field. This geometry captures the main effects under study, and is consistent with the nature of turbulence in a strong, well ordered magnetic field (Strauss 1976, Sridhar & Goldreich 1994, Goldreich & Sridhar 1997). We recognize that interstellar turbulence is frequently observed to be highly supersonic, and thus cannot be entirely incompressible. We expect that compressible turbulence to result in magnetic flux transport just as incompressible turbulence does, but that magnetic feedback on the turbulence is stronger in the compressible case. Under the assumptions of incompressibility and two dimensionality, the line stretching term vanishes, and eqn. (5) reduces to ∂ ∂t B ρ + v · ∇ B ρ = 1 ρ∇· B 2 4πρ τni∇B, (6) where B now represents the amplitude of the magnetic field, τni ≡ τinρn/ρi is the neutral-ion collision time, and we have used eqn. (1). Equation (6) is close to an advection - diffusion equation for the flux to mass ratio Q ≡ B/ρ ∂Q ∂t + v · ∇Q = 1 ρ∇·λ∇B, (7) provided that we define the diffusivity λ as τniv2 A, where B/(4πρ)1/2 is the Alfven speed. The diffusion of Q is nonlinear in the sense that λ = λ(Q, ρ). This nonlinearity can produce sharp fronts along surfaces where B vanishes or is tightly folded (Brandenburg & Zweibel 1994), similar to fronts created by nonlinear thermal conduction (Zel'dovich & Raizer 1966). Resistive diffusion in these current sheets alters the mass to flux ratio as well as changing the magnetic topology (Brandenburg & Zweibel 1995, Zweibel & Brandenburg 1997). In this paper we assume that the relative variation of B/ρ is so weak that nonlinear effects play only a minor role in ambipolar drift, and B remains nonsingular. Equation (7) can be used to derive an equation for the rate of change of B within a comoving volume V of fluid; that is, a fluid element of fixed mass. We have d dtZV d3xρQ =ZV d3x ∂ ∂t ρQ +ZS d2xρQv · n, (8) where S is the surface of V . The first term on the RHS of eqn. (8) is the Eulerian change of B and the second term accounts for the motion of V . Using eqns. (4) and (7) to expand the first term on the RHS and applying Gauss' theorem yields d dtZV d3xρQ =ZS d2xλn · ∇B. (9) Since the mass within V is constant, eqn. (9) shows that the flux to mass ratio within a volume moving with the center of mass velocity decreases if the magnetic field decreases outward on the surface of the volume. -- 5 -- 2.2. Timescales In the absence of flow, the characteristic diffusion time for a magnetic field of representative strength B and scale length L ∼ B/∇B is L2 λ td0 ≡ = L2 v2 Aτni = τ 2 A τni , . where τA ≡ L/vA is the global Alfven time. (10) Expressing td0 in physical units reveals the magnitude of the timescale problem. We take τni from Draine, Dalgarno, & Roberge (1983); when the ratio of ion to neutral atomic weight Ai/An ≫ 1, τni = 6.7 × 108n−1 s. The Alfven speed vA = 2.2 × 105Bµ/(nnAn)1/2 cm s−1. The nxi) cm2 s−1, where xi ≡ ni/nn is the ionization fraction. diffusivity λ is then 3.2 × 1019B 2 µ/(Ann2 The drift time is i td0 = 3.1 × 1020 N 2 20xiAn B 2 µ s, (11) where N20 ≡ nnL is the column density in units of 1020 cm−2. For example, the systems reported by Heiles (2001) have N20 a few tenths to a few, with Bµ typically 3. If we take An = 1.4 for gas of cosmic composition and xi = 10−4, which is probably a conservative lower limit, then we find td0 is of order 108 yr for these systems. Since this is much more than the 106 - 107 yr expected lifetime of an interstellar cloud, the diffusion rate must be enhanced by a factor of 10 - 100 in order to explain the flatness of the B − n relation. Mixing by eddies in the neutral gas requires that the magnetic field be frozen to the flow. The degree of freezing is measured by the ambipolar Reynolds number RAD, which is large under frozen in conditions (Zweibel & Brandenburg 1997). For eddies of characteristic size l and speed vt, RAD ≡ Thus, the field is frozen to the turbulent flow for lvt λ . (cid:18) l L(cid:19)(cid:18) vt vA(cid:19) > τni τA . (12) (13) Since τni/τA is expected to be small, while vt/vA is order unity, eqn. (13) implies a fair degree of dynamic range for the sizes of eddies that can mix the field. Equation (12) can also be written as RAD = v2 t v2 A τd τni , (14) which shows that if the flow is at or above equipartition with the field (vt ≥ vA), the field is frozen in if the neutral-ion collision time is less than the eddy turnover time. -- 6 -- 2.3. Initial Condition It will be useful in the following analysis to have a definite model for B. We take as an initial condition B(x, y, 0) = B00 + B ′′ 0 x2, 1 2 (15) ′′ where B00 and B 0 < 0 are constants. We will define λ using B00 for B0 in quantitative examples. We view eqn. (15) as the first two terms in a Taylor expansion of a magnetic field which peaks at x = 0, and will assume x/L ≪ 1. We first consider pure diffusion. Motivated by the initial condition (15), we seek solutions of eqn. (7), with v = 0, of the form B(x, y, t) = B0(t) + B ′′ 0 x2. 1 2 Substituting eqn. (16) into eqn. (7) and using eqn. (15), we find B0(t) = B00 + B ′′ 0 λt. Equation (17) predicts that the peak field decreases by a factor of two on a timescale Equation (18) agrees with eqn. (10) if we define the magnetic lengthscale L by td0 ≡ −B00/(2λB ′′ 0 ). L =(cid:18)− B00 2B ′′ 0(cid:19)1/2 . 3. Diffusion in the Presence of Waves (16) (17) (18) (19) We begin with a mixing length argument. Consider a magnetic flux tube of width a which is carried by a random flow u a distance l down the gradient of B. The field in the tube diffuses into the ambient medium; thus the motion causes net transport of B. The transport is most effective when the diffusion time across the tube is comparable to the advection time a2 λ ∼ l u , (20) because if a2/λ ≫ l/u, the flux tubes return to their original positions with nearly the same value of the field, while if a2/λ ≪ l/u the field diffuses too quickly to be advected by the flow. Advection spreads B over a distance l in a time l/u. In this time, B would spread diffusively over a distance (λl/u)1/2. By eqn. (20), this distance is just a. Advective mixing accelerates the transport of B only if a/l < 1, meaning that the motion consists of thin fingers which travel much -- 7 -- further than their widths (see Ottino 1989 for discussion of mixing by fingers, or tendrils). Such fingers are not seen in models of Alfvenic turbulence, and it is not clear that they would form in a weakly stratified gas such as the interstellar medium. Interpreted more broadly, the argument presented here shows that turbulent mixing requires more than just advection and dispersal; it also requires the formation of small scales. Now, we quantify this result. Weak turbulence theory, in which turbulence is modelled as a superposition of randomly phased waves, can be used to compute the rate of turbulent diffusion (eg. Moffatt 1978, Gruzinov & Diamond 1994). In this so-called quasilinear approach, one partitions quantities into mean and fluctuating parts and calculates the average effect of the fluctuations on the mean part. We used this method in a previous study of ambipolar diffusion (Zweibel 1988). In the present problem it is possible, as well as instructive, to solve the induction equation exactly instead of averaging it. This confirms the argument given in §2. We introduce a periodic flow in the x direction v = xu sin ωt sin ky. (21) Motivated by the initial condition eqn. (15), we try a solution of the advection-diffusion equation (7) of the form B(x, y, t) = B0(t) + B ′′ 0 + B1(t)x sin ky + B2(t) cos 2ky. (22) 1 2 Substituting eqn. (22) into eqn. (7), using eqn. (21), and equating like powers of x and Fourier harmonics of y leads to a set of coupled ODEs for the functions B0, B1, and B2. The solution for B0, which follows the decay of the peak magnetic field, is B0 = B00 + λB ′′ 0 t sin 2ωt 2ω (cid:19) + ′′ B ω2 0 u2 2 (cid:18)t − 2 (ω2 + Γ2)" Γ ω2 + Γ2 (cid:0)1 − e−Γt cos ωt(cid:1) ω2 + Γ2 e−Γt sin ωt#, ωΓ + + − sin2 ωt 2 (23) where Γ ≡ λk2. The maximum decay rate occurs when the motion given by eqn. (21) is coherent over many wave periods. The long time behavior of B0 is then given by where B0 = B00 + (λ + λt) B ′′ 0 t, Γu2 4 (ω2 + Γ2) λt ≡ (24) (25) -- 8 -- represents diffusion brought about by advective transport. Equation (25) closely resembles the turbulent diffusivity calculated from quasilinear theory (Moffatt 1978). Maximizing λt with respect to k, we find that the maximum occurs for ω = Γ, as we asserted in the mixing length argument following eqn. (10), and is λt,max = u2 8λk2 , (26) where we have replaced Γ by λk2. If we express u in terms of the maximum fluid displacement a ≡ u/ω and take the ratio of λt,max to λ, the result is k2a2 λt,max (27) = λ . 8 Equation (27) shows that the diffusion rate is appreciably enhanced by waves only if ka ≫ 1, meaning that the flow consists of long, thin streamers (see also Press & Rybicki 1981). We reached the same conclusion from mixing length theory. The missing ingredient is stretching and shrinking of scales, an intrinsic feature of turbulent flows which we incorporate in the next section. 4. Stagnation Point Flow Hyperbolic stagnation point flow is a particularly tractable example of a flow with exponen- tial shrinking and stretching. At hyperbolic stagnation points, the fluid flow converges in one (or two) directions and diverges in the other direction(s), while maintaining incompressibility. It is well known that diffusion is accelerated in the vicinity of stagnation points, due to the shrinking of scales in the convergent directions (Moffatt 1978, Zweibel 1998), while Zel'dovich et al. (1984) demonstrated dynamo action by a random ensemble of stagnation points. The role of hyper- bolic stagnation points in the mixing of scalar fields in turbulent flows has recently been reviewed (Shraiman & Siggia 2000) with emphasis on the development of intermittency, and the high order moments of the distribution of concentrations. The advection-diffusion problem for fields of the form (15) is exactly soluble for stagnation point flow. In subsection (4.1) we compute the effect of a single stagnation point. In subsection (4.2) we superimpose the effects of a random ensemble of stagnation points, and in subsection (4.3) we discuss the relationship between the stagnation point model and turbulent flow. Our model is not intended to be a full theory of turbulence, but merely illustrative. 4.1. A Single Stagnation Point We consider two dimensional, incompressible flow near a stagnation point at (ax, ay). For fields of the form given by eqn. (15), we require ax/L ≪ 1, where L is given by eqn. (19). The flow is (28) vx = −γ (x − ax) , vy = γ (y − ay) , (29) -- 9 -- where γ is a constant. It is straightforward to integrate equations (28) to find the position at time t of a fluid parcel which is at position (x0, y0) at t = 0 x = ax + (x0 − ax) e−γt y = ay + (y0 − ay) eγt. The initial coordinates in terms of the coordinates at time t are x0 = ax + (x − ax)eγt y0 = ay + (y − ay)e−γt. (30) (31) (32) (33) We now compute the effect of this stagnation point flow on the diffusion of the magnetic field. With eqn. (15) as the initial condition, we look for a solution of the form B(x, y, t) = B0(t) + B ′′ 0 x2 0, 1 2 (34) where x0(x, y, t) is given by eqn. (32). Substituting eqn. (34) into the advection-diffusion equation (7) yields B0 = λB ′′ 0 e2γt. (35) B is of the form (34) exist for two reasons. First, x0 is a constant of the motion, so for any function f (x0) ∂f (x0) ∂t + v · ∇f (x0) = 0, (36) where v is given by eqns. (28). Second, eqn. (32) shows that x0 is a linear function of x and y, so ∇2x0 is only a function of time, and is independent of the stagnation point location (ax, ay). The solution of eqn. (35) which fits the initial conditions is B0(t) = B00 + λ 2γ B ′′ 0 (cid:0)e2γt − 1(cid:1) . (37) The location of the peak field evolves in time to ax(1 − e−γt), but this is irrelevant because the density ρ is shifted by the same amount. It is only diffusion which affects the mass to flux ratio. According to eqn. (35), the peak field has dropped to half its value in the time tγ tγ = 1 2γ ln (1 + 2γtd0) , (38) where td0 is the diffusion time in the static case, defined in eqn. (18). Equation (38) shows that the diffusion time depends only logarithmically on the diffusivity λ. This arises because of the exponential growth of the magnetic field gradient, as seen in eqn. (35). The quantity 2γtd0 which appears in the logarithm in eqn. (38) is, however, a large number. If we identify γ−1 ∼ l/vt with an eddy turnover time τd, and use eqns. (10) and (12), we can write (39) 2γtd0 ∼ 2 τ 2 A τdτni ∼ 2RAD L2 l2 . -- 10 -- At the time tγ, the x component of the drift velocity vDx is half the flow velocity vx = γx. Beyond this time, the magnetic field is not well coupled to the flow. 4.2. An Ensemble of Stagnation Points We compute the evolution of the magnetic field carried by Lagrangian fluid elements under sequences of stagnation point flows oriented in random directions, each one of which endures for a time τ (see Childress & Gilbert 1995 for a general discussion of these so-called renewing flows). We take the flow during time (n − 1)τ < t < nτ to be n(cid:1)1/2 vnx = γµnx + γ(cid:0)1 − µ2 y, n(cid:1)1/2 vny = γ(cid:0)1 − µ2 x − γµny, where −1 ≤ µn ≤ 1 and n ≥ 1, and for simplicity we have taken all flows to have the same strength γ. Equation (40) reduces to eqn. (28) if µ = −1. These flows are curl free, and hence not of the most general possible type. However, in the neighborhoods of stagnation points, vorticity leads to changes of scale at an algebraic rather than exponential rate, complicating the mathematics while having little effect on the diffusion rate (Zel'dovich et al. 1984, Zweibel 1998). Thus, vorticity is of secondary importance to our problem, and we omit it here, although interstellar turbulence almost certainly possesses vorticity. (40) (41) Let the (x, y) coordinates of a fluid parcel at time (n − 1)τ be rn−1. Then at time nτ , the coordinates rn can be written as where the matrix An is rn = An · rn−1, cosh γτ + µn sinh γτ sinh γτ (cid:0)1 − µ2 n(cid:1)1/2 Inverting eqn. (42) yields rn−1 in terms of rn sinh γτ cosh γτ − µn sinh γτ ! (cid:0)1 − µ2 n(cid:1)1/2 rn−1 = A−1 n ·rn. (42) (43) Successive backwards iteration of eqn. (43) yields the initial position r0 in terms of the coordinate rN ≡ r(N τ, r0) r0 = A1 (44) −1 · A2 −1...AN −1 · rN. At times nτ < t < (n + 1)τ , the position r(t) is related to the postion at time nτ by an equation similar to eqn. (42), where in the matrix A we replace γτ by γ(t − nτ ). Since the matrices An are independent of the spatial coordinates, r0 is a linear function of 0 is a function only of time. It follows that the rN, or, more generally, r(t). This means that ∇2x2 -- 11 -- solution B of the advection- diffusion equation (7) can still be written in the form of eqn. (34), and that the rate of diffusion increases with time at the same rate as ∇2x2 0. In order to estimate the rate of increase of ∇2x2 0, we generated random sequences of µn and calculated r0 from rN according to eqn. (44). We used the result to calculate ∇2x2 0 as a function of n, or equivalently, as a function of time, since n corresponds to the time nτ . The only adjustable parameter in these calculations is γτ , which measures the coherence of the flow, here the renewal interval in units of the stretching rate. We expect γτ to be O(1). Figure (1) shows the dimensionless diffusion rate as a function of iteration number in the case γτ = 0.5. On average, the increase in diffusion rate is well fit by an exponential, and is about 84% Fig. 1. -- The natural log of the increase in diffusion rate, or amplification factor, with time, or the number of iterations. Each solid curve is the average of 50 independent realizations of the iteration process. The dashed line, which has slope 0.838, is the exponential with the same final value as the average of the curves. The maximum amplification factor possible would occur if all stagnation points had inflow along the x axis, and would have a slope of 1 in these units. the rate of increase for coherent stagnation point flow given in eqn. (28). After 20 renewals the average diffusion rate is more than 107 times larger than its original value. This is much larger than the 2-3 orders of magnitude that we estimated in §2.2 as required to explain the B − n relation. The mean amplification rate is relatively insensitive to the coherence parameter γτ , being about 75% of maximum if γτ = 0.1 and about 87% of maximum if γτ = 1. However, there is substantial dispersion about the mean. Each solid curve represents 50 -- 12 -- independent sequences of iterations, and Fig. (1) shows differences between them. The standard deviation within each set of 50 sequences is typically about 40% of the mean, and the amplification factors for single sequences rarely grow exponentially. This is illustrated in Figure (2). The large Fig. 2. -- The natural log of the increase in diffusion rate, or amplification factor, with time, or the number of iterations. Each solid curve is a single independent realization of the iteration process. The curves, which correspond to the first 5 members of a larger ensemble, show the intrinsic variability of the amplification process. standard deviation suggests that the diffusion rate in this model is highly intermittent, which is characteristic of turbulent mixing. Additional evidence of intermittency is seen in the PDFs of the distribution of amplification factors, shown in Figure (3) for two different values of γτ . The maximum possible amplification rate of 20 imposes a cutoff on the high amplification side of the curve for γτ = 1.0; the PDF for the case γτ = 0.1 is more symmetrical because the mean amplification rate is well below the maximum. 4.3. The Stagnation Point Model and Turbulent Flow The hyperbolic stagnation point model achieves fast diffusion by increasing the magnetic field gradient at, on average, nearly exponential rates. Chaotic flow achieves fast stretching and shrinking without hyperbolic stagnation points because the trajectories of neighboring fluid particles separate at an exponential rate. Small differences in the rates of exponential change lead to highly intermit- tent distributions of scalar quantities, which we saw reflected in the stagnation point model through -- 13 -- Fig. 3. -- Normalized frequency distributions, or PDFs, of the natural logarithms of the amplifi- cation factors for 10 iterations at γτ = 1.0 (solid curve) and 100 iterations at γτ = 0.1 (dashed curve), so that the curves correspond to the same total time. Each curve is based on 104 random sequences of iterations. the wide dispersion of amplification rates (see Figures 2 & 3). The maximum rate of stretching of a fluid element labelled by its initial position x0 is given by the Lyapunov exponent Λ(x0) Λ (x0) ≡ max e0 lim sup t→∞ 1 t ln ∂x ∂x0 · e0 , (45) where the e0 are the set of all possible unit vectors (see Childress & Gilbert 1995). In order to make it plausible that the diffusion rate is enhanced by exponential shrinking and stretching in a flow, we imagine that the diffusivity λ is so small that we can ignore it. In this limit, the solution of the advection equation for the initial condition (15) is B (x, t) = B (x0, 0) = B00 + 1 2 B ′′ 0 x2 0 (x) . If we restore diffusion, it appears in the advection-diffusion equation (7) as the term (46) (47) λB ′′ 0∇2 x2 0 2 = λB ′′ 0(cid:0)x0∇2x0 + ∇x0 · ∇x0(cid:1) . The quantity ∇x0 · ∇x0 on the right hand side of eqn. (47) is the square of the inverse of the stretching rate. This suggests heuristically that the diffusion rate grows exponentially. -- 14 -- Examples of 2D, chaotic, spatially periodic flow with a single lengthscale, including maps of Lyapunov exponents and other measures of chaos, are given by Galloway & Proctor (1992), Ponty et al. (1993) and Cattaneo et al. (1995). 5. Dynamical Feedback with Extension to 3D In §4, we prescribed a strictly 2D flow, and neglected feedback by Lorentz forces. In fact, by virtue of eqn. (1), the diffusion rate cannot be enhanced without increasing the Lorentz force, while 3D effects modify the diffusion process itself (compare eqns. (3) and (6)). In this section we quantify the effects of magnetic feedback and derive criteria for the validity of the 2D model. We assume the stagnation point flow given by eqns. (28) with a = 0. The magnetic field can be written using eqns. (32), (34), and (37) as B = B00(cid:20)1 − 1 4γtd0 (cid:0)e2γt − 1(cid:1) − x2 4L2 e2γt(cid:21) . (48) We evaluate the importance of feedback by following the force on a fluid element over the mixing time tγ. This probably overestimates the effects of magnetic feedback, because the coherence time τ of any particular realization of the flow is expected to be less than tγ. Thus, the constraints on the turbulence which we derive are likely to be conservative. In fact, mixing appears to take place in fully self consistent models of Alfven wave turbulence; Maron & Goldreich (2001). In what follows, it is useful to remember that the parameter 2γtd0, the ratio of the classical ambipolar diffusion time to the eddy turnover time, is large; see eqn. (39). We will sometimes use the inverse of this quantity as an expansion parameter. 5.1. Magnetic Pressure Forces We estimate the deceleration of an element of fluid by magnetic pressure in time tγ. The x component of magnetic pressure force Fm is Fm = −x ∂ ∂x B 2 8π . The deceleration ∆vP of a fluid element over a time t is ∆vP (x0) = dsFm (x(s), s) , 1 ρZ t 0 (49) (50) where x(s) = x0e−γs is the position of the fluid element at time s and x0 is its original position. Substituting eqn. (48) into eqn. (49) and integrating eqn. (50) to t = tγ yields to leading order in 2γtd0 ∆vP (x0) = − B 2 00x0 16πρL2γ (2γtd0)1/2 , (51) -- 15 -- where we have assumed x0/L ≪ 1. The average velocity ¯v(x0) of the fluid element over this time is ¯v (x0) ≡ 1 tγ Z tγ 0 dsv(x(s), s), (52) where x(s) is once again the Lagrangian position of a fluid element. For the stagnation point flow (28), ¯v = , (53) x0 tγ to leading order in 2γtd0. Magnetic feedback on the flow is unimportant if ∆vP /¯v < 1. Combining eqns. (51) and (53), we derive ∆vP ¯v = B 2 00 32πρL2γ 2 (2γtd0)1/2 ln (2γtd0) . (54) Using eqns. (12) and (39), eqn. ( 54) can be rewritten as Equation (55) implies an upper limit τ P ∆vP ¯v = τd τ 2 A ln(cid:18)2 32τni(cid:19)1/2 τdτni(cid:19) . τA (cid:18) τd max on the eddy turnover time τd such that ∆vP /¯v ≤ 1; τA(cid:19)1/3(cid:20)ln(cid:18) τA√2τni(cid:19)(cid:21)−2/3 τni , τ P max τA =(cid:18)18 (55) (56) where, to sufficient accuracy, we have replaced τd by (32τ 2 timescale the magnetic field is still well frozen to the eddies; from eqns. (12) and (56), Aτni)1/3 in the logarithmic factor. On this RAD(cid:0)τ P max(cid:1) = 1/3 v2 t v2 A (cid:18)18 τ 2 A τ 2 ni(cid:19) (cid:20)ln(cid:18) τA√2τni(cid:19)(cid:21)−2/3 . (57) 5.2. 3D Effects We assume the turbulent motions are in the (x, y) plane, but depend weakly on z; i.e. the characteristic wavenumber k along the field is related to the turbulent lengthscale l by kl ≪ 1. This quasi-two dimensionality is expected to be a feature of Alfvenic turbulence in strong magnetic fields (Strauss 1976, Goldreich & Sridhar 1997). Since the field is fairly well frozen in even on scales l, it is very well frozen on the scale k−1, and the transverse field B⊥ is given to a good approximation by B⊥ = Bz(x0, t) ∂x⊥ ∂z , (58) -- 16 -- where x0 is the initial position of the fluid element at position x at time t. Let us introduce a small parameter ǫ and assume that ∂z is O(ǫ) relative to the perpendicular derivatives, and that B⊥/Bz is also O(ǫ) (this is the so-called reduced MHD ordering; Strauss 1976). It can then be shown that the changes in the ambipolar drift terms are of order ǫ2. Therefore, we may assume that weak three dimensionality has little effect on ambipolar drift of the vertical field. The bent field exerts a tension force which decelerates the fluid by an amount ∆vT . We compute ∆vT for a z dependent stagnation point flow model with vx = −γx cos kz, vy = γy cos kz, a generalization of eqns. (28). The Lagrangian positions are x = x0e−γt cos kz, y = y0eγt cos kz. According to eqns. (58) and (61), the x component of the field is Bx = Bzγtkx sin kz. The magnetic tension force Fm in the x direction is B 2 z 4π ∂Bx ∂z Fm = Bz 4π = γtk2x cos kz. (59) (60) (61) (62) (63) (64) We set z = 0 and follow a procedure similar to the derivation of eqn. (55), integrating Fm along the path of a fluid element from t = 0 to t = tγ. We approximate Bz by B00, which overestimates Fm. The result to leading order in (2γtd0)−1 is Using eqn. (53), the relative deceleration is ∆vT /¯v 1 ρZ tγ 0 dtFm = k2v2 Ax0 γ . ∆vT = ∆vT ¯v = k2v2 A 2γ 2 ln (2γtd0) . (65) (66) Equation (66) shows that magnetic tension has little effect on the fluid as long as the Alfven frequency along the fieldline is less than the eddy turnover rate by the factor [ln (2γtd0)]1/2. Equation (66) can be used to set an upper limit τ T max on the eddy turnover time such that the magnetic field reaches the mixing scale without decelerating the fluid. Proceeding as in the derivation of eqn. (56) we find τ T max τA = √2 kL (cid:20)ln(cid:18)√2kL τA τni(cid:19)(cid:21)−1/2 . (67) Equation (67) shows that tension forces are less important in long, thin structures, in which kL can be much less than one, than they are in flattened structures such as disks. The field is well frozen to the eddies as long as τA/τni ≫ 1. -- 17 -- 6. Application to the Galactic Magnetic Field Little is know about interstellar turbulence beyond its gross energetics: the turbulent kinetic energy is at or above equipartition with the magnetic energy. Energy injection by a variety of mechanisms, combined with nonlinear processes, should lead to a turbulent spectrum over a wide range in scales. In principle, any weakly ionized interstellar structure which survives for several eddy turnover times is a candidate for turbulent ambipolar diffusion. We showed in §5 that the efficiency of turbu- lent ambipolar drift can be limited by the back reaction of magnetic forces. In the strictly 2D case, the increase in ambipolar diffusion rate is associated with the local buildup of magnetic pressure forces, and in the 3D case, by magnetic tension forces as well. We expressed these constraints in terms of lower bounds on the strain rates, or inverse eddy turnover times, such that concentration of the field occurs before deceleration of the flow. These constraints appear in eqns. (56) and (67). Here, we express them numerically. The critical parameters are the ratio τni/τA and the geometrical factor kL. Referring back to §2.2 for numerical values, we have τni τA = 4.8 × 10−5 Bµ Lpcni (nnAn)1/2 , (68) where L is expressed in parsecs. For example, if nn = 50 cm−3, ni = 5 × 10−3 cm−3, An = 1.4, Lpc = 1, Bµ = 3, τni/τA = 3.4 × 10−3, and eqn. (56) requires τd/τA < 0.13. If vt ∼ vA, turbulence on the scale of a tenth of a parsec or less can mix the magnetic field down to the ambipolar diffusion scale. On the other hand, eqn. (67) requires τd/τA < 0.09(2π/kL), which is a more severe constraint, especially in a highly flattened structure. There is at least one type of H I structure in which flux freezing appears to be obeyed. Mag- netic fields in H I shells are observed to be quite strong, with magnitudes consistent with shock compression (Heiles 1989). The same observations suggest that turbulence with Alfvenic or slightly subAlfvenic velocities is present. If these shells were not expanding, they would appear to fulfill the conditions for fast ambipolar drift, and their strong fields would be counterexamples to the theory. However, expansion of the shells at speeds of order 10 - 20 km/s adds new magnetic flux faster than it can diffuse upstream, while on the downstream side the ionization is too high for efficient ambipolar drift. Thus, the field in the shells remains large. Recent observations by Heiles (2001b) and Heiles & Troland (2001) of cold, moderately dense H I regions which have weak magnetic fields, Alfvenic random velocities, and no observed association with shells appear to be better candidates for fast ambipolar drift. -- 18 -- 7. Summary and Conclusions Observations show that while interstellar magnetic fieldstrength and gas density are to some extent correlated, the fieldstrength is often lower than expected. This suggests that processes beyond ideal MHD may play a role. The flux to mass ratio is altered by ambipolar drift, but estimates of the ambipolar diffusivity v2 Aτni predict that ambipolar drift is important only in very dense, strongly magnetized gas with substantial gradients on small scales. However, it is well established that turbulence can enhance the transport rates of quantities such as entropy and angular momentum. This motivated us to consider the effect of turbulence on the rate of ambipolar drift. Enhancement by roughly two orders of magnitude would explain the observations. As a first attempt on the problem, we considered the geometrically restricted case of a straight magnetic field, with a transverse gradient, mixed by 2D, perpendicular turbulence. In this situation, ambipolar drift is described by a nonlinear diffusion term [eqn. (6)]. For simplicity, however, we approximated the diffusivity as linear. We showed by a mixing length argument, and then an explicit calculation (§3) that advection of the field by a periodic flow reduces its peak value. However, unless the motions are long and thin, like streamers, the rate of relaxation is no faster than relaxation by ambipolar drift alone. The missing ingredient is stretching and shrinking of scales, which in chaotic flows happens at an exponential rate. In §4 we modelled these exponential changes of scale by representing the flow as a sequence of randomly oriented hyperbolic stagnation points. With this model, and a parabolic initial condition for the magnetic profile, the advection-diffusion equation (7) can be solved exactly. The model predicts an exponential increase of the mean diffusion rate with time (Figure 1), although with considerable variance from point to point (Figures 2 & 3). The stagnation point model predicts that the field diffuses on a timescale comparable to the eddy turnover time, with only logarithmic dependence on the ambipolar diffusivity itself and on the original gradient lengthscale. In §5, we estimated the back reaction of magnetic pressure and tension forces on the stagnation point flow, including weak three dimensionality. The relative deceleration of the fluid over one mixing time is given for pressure forces by eqn. (54) and for tension forces by eqn. (66). Comparing the deceleration time of a fluid element to the mixing time, we derived upper limits on the eddy turnover time such that deceleration is order unity or less within a mixing time [eqns. (56) and (67)]. As we showed in §6, these criteria can be satisfied in the interstellar medium without extreme assumptions about the size and velocity of the turbulent eddies, although they cannot be wholly ignored. These estimates of feedback are conservative in the sense that a fully self consistent model of MHD turbulence can still produce fast mixing, as shown by Maron & Goldreich (2001) for spreading of a passive scalar. This conclusion may be dependent on geometry, however, as concluded by Kim (1997) based on a study of turbulent decay of a coplanar magnetic field caused by 2D incompressible motions in weakly ionized fluid. -- 19 -- The outcome of these calculations is that turbulence is likely to have a major effect on the magnetic flux to mass ratio in the weakly ionized portions of the interstellar medium, making the magnetic field more uniform. The model presented here applies to regions with simple magnetic topology, filamentary structure, and no global cross-field flows. It follows that the strength of the field is not necessarily a good indicator of the dynamical processes which determine the gas density. Although the results presented here are consistent with the conventional wisdom that turbulent mixing takes place in an eddy turnover time, it is important to recognize that they are not obtained from a full model of turbulence. We plan to extend this work to more realistic models which include compressibility, vorticity, and a self consistent treatment of magnetic forces as well as more general magnetic geometry. If the stagnation point model holds up in comparison with more complete models, it could be useful in other mixing problems. Magnetic reconnection can also change the magnetic flux to mass ratio. Lazarian & Vishniac (1999) have argued that if the spectrum of interstellar turbulence extends to the resistive scale then reconnection takes place at the Alfven speed. We have concentrated here on ambipolar drift because it does not require turbulent structure on such small scales; if flux is quickly redistributed in the fully ionized portions of the ISM then an alternative process is certainly required. This work was initiated during the program on Astrophysical Turbulence at the ITP in Santa Barbara in 2000. I am happy to acknowledge useful discussions with Nic Brummell, Dick Crutcher, George Field, Carl Heiles, Fabian Heitsch, David Hughes, Eun-jin Kim, Steve Tobias, Tom Troland, and especially the referee, Pat Diamond. Material support was provided by NSF Grants AST 9800616 and AST 0098701 to the University of Colorado and PHY 9407194 to UC Santa Barbara. Bourke, T.L., Myers, P.C., Robinson, G., & Hyland, A.R. 2001, ApJ, in press, and astro-ph 0102469 REFERENCES Brandenburg, A., & Zweibel, E.G. 1994, ApJ, 427, L91 Brandenburg, A., & Zweibel, E.G. 1995, ApJ, 448, 734 Brogan, C. & Troland, T. 2001, ApJ, 550, 799 Cattaneo, F. 1994, ApJ, 434, 200 Cattaneo, F., Hughes, D.W., & Kim, E. 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 2057 Cattaneo, F., Kim, E., Proctor, M.R.E., & Tao, L. 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 1522 Cattaneo, F., & Vainshtein, S. 1991, ApJ, 376, L21 Childress, S. & Gilbert, A.D. 1995, Stretch, Twist, Fold: The Fast Dynamo, Springer -- 20 -- Crutcher, R.M. 1999, ApJ, 520, 706 Draine, B.T., Roberge, W.R., & Dalgarno, A. 1983, ApJ, 264, 485 Galloway, D.J. & Proctor, M.R.E. 1992, Nature, 356, 691 Goldreich, P.M., & Sridhar, S. 1997, ApJ, 485, 680 Gruzinov, A., & Diamond, P.H. 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 1651 Heiles, C. 1989, ApJ, 336, 808 Heiles, C. 2001a, to be published in Proceedings of the 4th Tetons Summer Conference, and astro-ph 0010047 Heiles, C. 2001b, ApJ, 551, L105 Heiles, C., & Troland, T. 2001, in preparation Kim, E. 1997, ApJ, 477, 183 Lazarian, A., & Vishniac, E.T. 1999, ApJ, 517, 700 Mestel, L. 1985, in Protostars & Planets II, eds. D.C. Black & M.S. Matthews, Univ. Arizona Press, p. 320 Mestel, L., & Spitzer, L.S. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 505 Moffatt, H.K. 1978, Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids, Cambridge Univ. Press Mouschovias, T. 1976, ApJ, 207, 141 Ottino, J.M. 1989, The Kinematics of Mixing, Cambridge Univ. Press Padoan, P. & Nordlund, A. 1999, ApJ, 526, 279 Ponty, Y.,Pouquet, A., Rom-Kedar, V., & Sulem, P.-L. 1993, in Solar & Planetary Dynamos, eds. M. Proctor, P. Matthews, & A. Rucklidge, Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 241 Press, W.H. & Rybicki, G. 1981, ApJ, 248, 751 Shraiman, B.I. & Siggia, E.D. 2000, Nature, 405, 639 Shu, F.H. 1983, ApJ, 273, 202 Sridhar, S., & Goldreich, P.M. 1994, ApJ, 432, 612 Strauss, H.R. 1976, Phys. Fluids, 19, 134 -- 21 -- Tomisaka, K., Ikeuchi, C., & Nakamura, T. 1988, ApJ, 335, 239 Troland, T.H. & Heiles, C. 1986, ApJ, 301, 339 Zel'dovich, Y.B.& Raizer, Y.P. 1966, Physics of Shock Waves & High Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena, Academic Press Zel'dovich, Y.B., Ruzmaikin, A.A., Molchanov, S.A., & Sokoloff, D.D. 1984, J. Fluid Mech., 144, 1 Zweibel, E.G. 1988, ApJ, 329, 384 Zweibel, E.G. 1998, Phys. Plasmas, 5, 247 Zweibel, E.G. & Brandenburg, A. 1997, ApJ, 478, 563 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0.
0801.0541	1	0801	2008-01-03T15:16:59	Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present Doppler imaging and Balmer line analysis of the weak-line T Tauri star TWA 6. Using this data we have made one of the first attempts to measure differential rotation in a T Tauri star, and the first detection of a slingshot prominence in such a star. We also show the most direct evidence to date of the existence of solar-type plages in a star other than the Sun. Observations were made over six nights: 11-13th February 2006 and 18-20th February 2006, when spectra were taken with the UCL Echelle Spectrograph on the 3.9-m Anglo-Australian Telescope. Using least-squares deconvolution to improve the effective signal--to--noise ratio we produced two Doppler maps. These show similar features to maps of other rapidly rotating T Tauri stars, i.e. a polar spot with more spots extending out of it down to equator. Comparison of the two maps was carried out to measure the differential rotation. Cross-correlation and parameter fitting indicates that TWA 6 does not have detectable differential rotation. The Balmer emission of the star was studied. The mean H-alpha profile has a narrow component consistent with rotational broadening and a broad component extending out to 250km/s. The variability in H-alpha suggests that the chromosphere has active regions that are cospatial with the spots in the photosphere, similar to the 'plages' observed on the Sun. In addition the star has at least one slingshot prominence 3 stellar radii above the surface - the first such detection in a T Tauri star.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–13 (2007) Printed 12 August 2017 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6 M. B. Skelly,1⋆ Y. C. Unruh,1 A. Collier Cameron,2 J. R. Barnes,3 J.-F. Donati,4 W. A. Lawson,5 B. D. Carter6 1 Astrophysics Group, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ 2 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS 3 Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB 4 Observatoire Midi-Pyr´en´ees, LATT, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France 5 School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia 6 Faculty of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, Australia 3 January 2008 ABSTRACT We present Doppler imaging and Balmer line analysis of the weak-line T Tauri star TWA 6. Using this data we have made one of the first attempts to measure differential rotation in a T Tauri star, and the first detection of a slingshot prominence in such a star. We also show the most direct evidence to date of the existence of solar-type plages in a star other than the Sun. Observations were made over six nights: 11–13th February 2006 and 18–20th February 2006, when spectra were taken with the UCL Echelle Spectrograph on the 3.9-m Anglo–Australian Telescope. Using least-squares deconvolution to improve the effective signal–to–noise ratio we produced two Doppler maps. These show similar fea- tures to maps of other rapidly rotating T Tauri stars, i.e. a polar spot with more spots extending out of it down to equator. Comparison of the two maps was carried out to measure the differential rotation. Cross-correlation and parameter fitting indicates that TWA 6 does not have detectable differential rotation. The Balmer emission of the star was studied. The mean Hα profile has a narrow component consistent with rotational broadening and a broad component extending out to ±250 km s−1. The variability in Hα suggests that the chromosphere has active regions that are cospatial with the spots in the photosphere, similar to the 'plages' observed on the Sun. In addition the star has at least one slingshot prominence 3R∗ above the surface – the first such detection in a T Tauri star. Key words: stars: pre-main-sequence – stars: late-type – stars: rotation – stars: spots – stars: individual: TWA 6 – stars: magnetic fields 8 0 0 2 n a J 3 ] h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 4 5 0 . 1 0 8 0 : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 T Tauri Stars T Tauri stars are pre-main sequence equivalents of Sun-like stars. They are young, have low masses (0.3 – 1.0 M⊙) and spectral types F–M (Hayashi 1966). The T Tauri phase is considered to begin when the star becomes optically visible and continues until hydrogen burning begins and the star has reached the post-T Tauri phase at an age of the order of 107 years (depending on spectral type). fall on Hayashi tracks on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, i.e. vertical tracks of constant temperature. As the star approaches the zero-age main se- Very young stars ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] quence (ZAMS) it can either continue to follow the Hayashi track all the way onto the ZAMS (and remain fully convec- tive), or develop a radiative core and turn onto the Henyey track and evolve onto the ZAMS with constant luminos- ity and increasing temperature. Which of these evolutionary paths the T Tauri star follows is thought to depend on the mass of the star but observations of TTS with ages close to this turn-off will allow us to characterise this stage of stellar evolution more fully. T Tauri stars fall into two subcategories – classical and weak-line (Bertout 1989 and references therein). Ob- servations of classical TTS (CTTS) show excess ultravio- let and infrared emission and strong emission line activity, characteristics which are due to the presence of a circum- stellar disc. The star–disc interactions lead to strong, ir- regular variability that is predominately due to accretion 2 M. B. Skelly et al of material from the disc onto the surface. The disc has a braking effect on the star, causing CTTS to rotate more slowly than their discless equivalents (Bouvier et al. 1993; Collier Cameron & Campbell 1993). Weak-line T Tauri stars (WTTS) have weaker emission- line activity and show less evidence of accretion. WTTS ap- pear to be older than CTTS on average (Armitage et al. 2003), suggesting that when TTS form they have circum- stellar discs which dissipate as the star evolves, but disc life- times are variable, ranging from 0.1 – 10 Myr (Bouvier et al. 1997). WTTS are variable, but in contrast to CTTS the vari- ation is usually periodic as it is due to cool spots that go in and out of view as the star rotates. These cool spots form when magnetic flux tubes emerge through the photosphere. Doppler imaging (Vogt & Penrod 1983) maps spots on stellar photospheres. Doppler imaging of rapidly rotat- ing, magnetically active stars, such as WTTS, often finds spots at high latitudes and even at the poles, see e.g. Rice & Strassmeier (1996), Strassmeier (2002), in contrast to the Sun where they are normally within ±30◦ of the equa- tor. One of the favoured explanations is that Coriolis forces in rapidly rotating stars cause the flux tubes to emerge at higher latitudes (Schuessler & Solanki 1992; Caligari et al. 1994). In the past Doppler imaging of cool stars has been limited by its challenging signal-to-noise requirements. The technique of least-squares deconvolution (LSD, Donati et al. 1997) has made it possible to produce Doppler images of stars for which the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) would be too low if individual spectral lines were used. In LSD the under- lying rotationally broadened line profile for each spectrum is found by deconvolving a line list from the spectrum. This makes it possible for late–K T Tauri stars to be imaged, where previously the SNR requirements would have been prohibitive. Sunspots are accompanied by prominences, i.e. loops of material that follow the magnetic field lines emerging through the surface of the star. High–lying prominences, known as 'slingshot prominences', typically appear as fast– moving absorption transients and have been observed in a number of young stars such as Speedy Mic (Dunstone et al. 2006) and AB Dor (Collier Cameron & Robinson 1989; Donati et al. 1999), but not in any TTS to date. These prominences are viewed as a tracer for large-scale magnetic fields. If a T Tauri star was shown to be able to support such high-lying prominences for several rotational periods it would suggest the presence of a large-scale field that does not decay away quickly outside the stellar radius. 1.2 Differential Rotation in Stars with Deep Convection Zones Fully convective stars are believed to have a distributed mag- netic dynamo (α2), arising from turbulent motions or Corio- lis forces, rather than a solar-type dynamo (αΩ) that is due to both convection and differential rotation, as seen in stars with radiative cores. Differential rotation, when rotational velocity is a func- tion of latitude, is expected to be less apparent with increas- ing convection zone depth (Kitchatinov & Rudiger 1999), so stars with larger convection zones are expected to rotate more like a solid body. Differential rotation in the Sun gives rise to the Ω effect that produces a large-scale toroidal field from the small-scale poloidal field. Most models for an α2 dy- namo rule out the possibility of there being differential rota- tion in fully convective stars (e.g. Chabrier & Kuker 2006). However Dobler et al. (2006) suggest fully convective stars have significant differential rotation, although this would not be Sun-like, and takes the form of a meridional circulation. Observations to date have only attempted to detect the latitudinal differential rotation seen in the Sun. A re- cent measurement for the fully-convective M4 dwarf V374 Peg (Morin et al. 2007) found a weak differential rotation (around 0.1 of the solar value). Differential rotation has been observed to fall with decreasing photospheric temperature. For example, figure 2 in Barnes et al. (2005a) plots differen- tial rotation against temperature. The trend seems to imply that differential rotation approaches zero below 4000K but it is uncertain where it becomes undetectable as there has been no measurement to date of stars with temperatures between 3800–4500K. In addition there have not been any reliable measurements of differential rotation in T Tauri stars. Such measurements are needed to confirm that TTS follow these trends too. 1.3 TW Hydrae Association Nearby young co-moving groups are a rich source of T Tauri stars for observation. Our chosen targets lie in the TW Hy- drae association (TWA), a group of pre-main sequence stars lying at a distance of about 51 ± 5pc and with an age of 8 Myr (Zuckerman & Song 2004). Of the 24 likely mem- bers of the TWA, 16 have had their periods measured in Lawson & Crause (2005). The age of this association is an important one as it is corresponds to the mean age of cir- cumstellar discs and hence the time when T Tauri stars can begin to spin up, so the members of this association are inter- esting objects for study. The star that gives the association its name (TW Hya) is a classical T Tauri star, spectral type K7. Its disc has been directly imaged in Krist et al. (2000) and its magnetic field was detected in Yang et al. (2007). Although it is rotating fairly rapidly (P = 2.8d) it is almost pole–on and is therefore not a suitable candidate for Doppler imaging. This paper concerns another member of the TW Hy- drae association – TWA 6. It has a spectral type of K7 (Webb et al. 1999), corresponding to a temperature of about 4000K for a T Tauri star (Cohen & Kuhi 1979). Models by Siess et al. (2000) indicate that it is fully convective or just beginning to develop a radiative core. Photometry has revealed a large lightcurve amplitude, with a variation of 0.49 magnitudes in the V band (Lawson & Crause 2005). Its rapid rotation, v sin i = 55 km s−1 (Webb et al. 1999) and period of 0.54 days (Lawson & Crause 2005) make it an ex- cellent target for Doppler imaging. In this paper we present Doppler images of TWA 6, and a discussion of whether it has differential rotation. We also analyse the Balmer line emis- sion in order to study the behaviour of the chromosphere. 2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION Observations were carried out at the Anglo-Australian Tele- scope (AAT) using the University College London Echelle Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6 3 Spectrograph (UCLES) and the EEV2 2k × 4k detector be- tween 11–20th February 2006. In order to detect differential rotation observations were made with a gap of 4 nights. By doing this two maps can be made of the star allowing differ- ential rotation to be detected, or an upper limit placed on its value (Petit et al. 2004). With three nights of observations on either side of this gap full phase coverage was achievable on these two separate occasions. We took spectra of the targets, telluric and spectral standard stars, and calibration frames (see tables 1 and 2). UCLES was centred at 5500A giving a wavelength coverage of 4400 − 7200A. A slit width of 1.0′′ was used giving a spectral resolution of 45000. The weather on the first three nights was reasonably good, and although conditions and seeing were variable (see- ing ranged from 1.2–2.2′′) in total only 3 hrs were lost. 36 good quality spectra of TWA 6 were obtained, as well as 27 spectra of our secondary target TWA 17 (Skelly et al, in prep.). On the second set of nights the weather was of vari- able quality and more time was lost. Of a potential 24 hours we had 13 hours of observing time, with seeing between 1.3 – 2.2′′. Most of this time were concentrated on TWA 6 and a further 39 spectra were obtained. An additional 1.5hr of observing time was obtained on 17th Feb 2006 due to the early finish of aluminising the telescope mirror. 2.1 Data Reduction Data reduction was carried out with the STARLINK rou- tine ECHOMOP (Mills et al. 1997). Frames were bias sub- tracted and flatfielded, cosmic rays were removed and the spectra were extracted. Sky subtraction was carried out by subtracting a polynomial fitted to the inter-order gaps. The spectra were normalised using a continuum fit to a star of the same spectral type. The spectral type (K7) was verified by eye by identifying the best temperature fit to the spec- tra in comparison with the template spectra. Wavelength calibration was carried out using ThAr arc spectra. 3 LEAST-SQUARES DECONVOLUTION As the 36+39 spectra did not have a high enough SNR for Doppler imaging we used least-squares deconvolution (LSD, described in Donati et al. 1997) to extract the underlying ro- tationally broadened profiles. LSD uses matrix inversion to deconvolve a line list from a spectrum to leave a high signal- to-noise profile. The program SPDECON (implemented as described in Barnes et al. 1998) was used to do this. We used a line list from the Vienna Atomic Line Database (VALD, Kupka et al. 2000) for a 4000K star. Over 4000 images of 2000 spectral lines were used in the deconvolution leading to a signal gain of ∼ 60. For the deconvolution, the lines were weighted by counts2/variance. The effect of this is to favour regions of the spectrum with higher SNR, and the centres of the orders rather than the wings. The resultant line profiles had a mean centroidal wavelength of 5530A. There was a small consistent tilt in the profiles which was removed by fitting a straight line between the two sec- tions of continuum on the left and right sides. This tilt changed depending on which spectral standard was used and hence is most likely due to a small mismatch between the Figure 1. The dashed line shows the mean deconvolved profile for the first dataset (11–13th Feb 2006). There is an absorption feature due to sunlight reflected off the Moon at 0 km s−1. The solid line is the mean of the profiles after this feature was removed and a slope was removed. Mean errors are shown for the data after the feature was removed. The errors close to 0 km s−1have been increased due to the subtraction. temperatures of the star and the spectral standards. In ad- dition there was a feature near 0 km s−1 in many of the profiles. It was identified as being due to moonlight in the spectra as it only appeared to be present when the Moon was above the horizon (Fig 1). As we did not have a solar spectrum we deconvolved the hottest template spectrum (K3) we had taken with UCLES to model the shape of this feature. We were unable to find a pattern to its depth as it is difficult to disentangle from variations due to surface features. We failed to find a re- lationship between its equivalent width and the zenith dis- tance, time or seeing, although the absorption signal was stronger during bad weather. Hence for all spectra taken when the Moon was up, a constant shape was subtracted from all profiles taken within the same night (see Fig. 1). This was calculated by inspecting the mean of all profiles, and subtracting a profile such that the absorption feature was not obvious in the mean. A scale factor was calculated separately for each night. The errors for the pixels affected were increased so that these pixels would have a lower influ- ence on the final image produced. This was done by adding in quadrature the error produced by SPDECON and the amount that was subtracted from each pixel. Each of the deconvolved profiles has been normalised by dividing through by the mean profile. In Fig. 2 the nor- malised profiles have been stacked and shown in greyscale. As spots appear in emission the lighter regions in these im- ages show the spots being carried across the stellar disc. Spot groups are apparent at the same phases in both, particularly around phases 0.05 and 0.55, corresponding to longitudes of 340◦ and 160◦. This suggests that the spot distribution is similar at both epochs. 4 M. B. Skelly et al Table 1. Table setting out the observations made on the nights of 11/02/06 to 13/02/06. Spectral types in the 'Comments' column refer to spectral standards. The signal-to-noise ratio is the maximum for the set of exposures. Object Date UT Start Exp. time [s] No. of Frames S/N Comments Conditions HR 3037 HR 3037 HD 34673 TWA 6 HR 3037 HD 52919 TWA 6 SAO 116640 TWA 6 TWA 6 TWA 17 TWA 6 GJ 204 GJ 3331A TWA 6 TWA 6 HD 19007 TWA 17 HR 3037 TWA 17 TWA 17 HR 3037 TWA 17 HR 3037 TWA 17 HR 3037 HD 52919 SAO 116640 GJ 3331A TWA 6 GJ 204 TWA 17 TWA 6 TWA 17 TWA 6 TWA 17 TWA 6 TWA 17 TWA 6 TWA 17 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 09:42:56 09:46:15 09:58:05 10:25:43 12:10:19 12:16:17 12:22:44 13:45:02 13:55:31 15:17:37 16:43:21 18:01:59 09:40:18 10:01:49 10:23:33 10:42:47 11:04:33 12:42:06 13:06:28 13:13:37 14:06:49 15:26:56 15:42:30 16:48:51 16:55:16 09:32:42 09:35:50 09:40:57 09:50:39 10:09:24 12:36:26 12:44:30 13:31:51 13:49:34 14:33:20 15:01:47 15:35:40 15:54:08 17:22:43 17:40:59 20 120 200 900 20 200 900 450 900 900 1200 900 120 900 900 900 200 1200 20 1200 1200 20 1200 20 1200 20 200 400 900 900 120 1200 900 1200 900 1200 900 1200 900 1200 1 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 5 5 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 9 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 4 98 Telluric 164 Telluric 68 K3 53 Target 1 105 Telluric 79 K5 63 Target 1 110 K7 58 Target 1 62 Target 1 48 Target 2 53 Target 1 58 K5 16 M2 19 Target 1 3 Target 1 40 K4 31 Target 2 90 Telluric 33 Target 2 42 Target 2 40 Telluric 28 Target 2 87 Telluric 36 Target 2 49 Telluric 90 K5 82 K7 18 M2 37 Target 1 67 K5 23 Target 2 39 Target 1 30 Target 2 42 Target 1 27 Target 2 44 Target 1 31 Target 2 49 Target 1 34 Target 2 Diffuse cloud Diffuse cloud Aborted 148s Heavy cloud Cloud Cloud Some fog Seeing > 2" Seeing > 2" Seeing > 2" Seeing > 2" Seeing > 2" 4 DOPPLER IMAGING 4.1 Doppler Imaging Code The unnormalised profiles and corresponding errors pro- duced by SPDECON are used as inputs for the program DoTS (Collier Cameron 2001). The program calculates the surface temperature distribution by using χ2 minimization to find the best fit to the data. A two-temperature model is used to describe the star (Collier-Cameron & Unruh 1994) and each element of the star is assigned a spot-filling factor f . DoTS finds an optimal solution by minimising χ2 while maximising the entropy of the image. It is not sufficient to simply minimize χ2 as a large number of images may fit the data, particularly when the errors are large. The maximum entropy approach allows a unique image to be returned that does not contain information that was not required by the data (Skilling & Bryan 1984). DoTS also requires a look-up table, containing the shape of the unbroadened spectral line at a number of limb angles and at the spot and photospheric temperatures. 4.2 Stellar Parameters Many of the parameters of TWA 6 were known from previ- ous work and are listed in table 3. Also listed are our new or updated parameters as determined using χ2 minimiza- tion. Testing the program with artificial data has shown that nearly all of the parameters can be derived indepen- dently by finding the value which gives the lowest χ2 (even if the other parameters have not yet been fixed). However, Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6 5 Table 2. As table 1 for observations made on the nights of 17/02/06 to 20/02/06. Object Date UT Start Exp. time[s] No. of Frames S/N Comments Conditions HR 3037 TWA 6 GJ 529 TWA 6 BD -20 4645 HR 3037 BD -02 801 TWA 6 HR 3037 TWA 6 TWA 17 TWA 6 HR 3037 TWA 6 HR 3037 TWA 6 TWA 17 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 17:07:40 17:10:02 16:53:38 17:14:09 18:23:37 09:55:30 10:02:10 10:18:29 15:05:55 15:08:40 17:19:03 17:41:09 09:40:29 09:45:46 14:36:28 14:39:22 17:22:40 20 900 200 900 650 20 800 900 20 900 1200 900 20 900 20 900 1200 1 6 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 8 1 4 1 14 1 10 2 75 Telluric 59 Target 38 K4.5 67 Target 114 K6 121 Telluric 115 K6 42 Target 1 74 Telluric 58 Target 1 46 Target 2 54 Target 1 110 Telluric 38 Target 1 97 Telluric 51 Target 1 31 Target 2 Late start Storms Cloud/seeing > 2′′ Cloud/seeing > 2′′ 3rd aborted 768s Storm Some cloud Some cloud Some cloud Cirrus cloud Cirrus cloud Cirrus cloud Cirrus cloud Cirrus cloud The minimum of the χ2 plot is not as clear as with some of the other parameters and the curve is very shallow around the minimum χ2, found at an inclination of 47◦. This dif- ficulty in obtaining the inclination angle has been noted in other work e.g. Kuerster et al. (1994) where ±10◦ is given as a reasonable range. The errors given in table 3 were de- termined by eye from the width of the 'trough' in the χ2 vs sin i plot. Using the inclination angle, period and projected equa- torial velocity the radius was calculated. The resulting value of 1.05R⊙ is within one sigma of the value calculated using the distance and V - R colour of (0.8 ± 0.4)R⊙, using the method described in Gray (1992). It should be noted that the distance quoted in table 3 is determined using Hippar- cos distances to other members of the TWA and is therefore uncertain so the radius determination using the rotational velocity and period is the more reliable one. Assuming an age of 8 Myr, an effective temperature of 4000K and a luminosity of 0.25 L⊙ the best-fitting mass of the star, from both the Alexander et al. (1989) and the Kurucz (1991) opacities (D'Antona & Mazzitelli 1994), is 0.7M⊙. The luminosity was calculated using the radius and effective temperature. 4.3 Surface Images Fig. 3 shows the fits to the profiles for both datasets. For the first dataset we achieve a χ2 of 1.7, in the second dataset it is 2.6. A reduced χ2 of 1.0 is not achieved for either dataset. The errors estimated in LSD using photon noise statistics are often underestimated in the case of unpolarised spectra (Donati & Collier Cameron 1997). No scaling of errors was carried out in this work, so χ2 values greater than 1 are expected. The normalised residuals of the fits compared to the data were studied and there are no obvious systematic effects increasing the χ2 or introducing artefacts into the maps. The distortions in the profiles are very large, suggest- Figure 2. Greyscale images of the LSD profiles divided by the mean profile for 11–13th Feb (left) and 17–20th Feb (right). Spots appear as emission (white). The greyscale is given in the bar at the bottom. for some parameters the minimization must be carried out for two parameters simultaneously, e.g. period and differen- tial rotation must be determined together (see section 4.5 for further discussion of differential rotation). Of the previously measured values only one changed by a notable amount: the projected rotational velocity, v sin i was found to have a value of 72 km s−1, somewhat higher than the previously measured value of 55 km s−1 (Webb et al. 1999). Constraining the inclination is slightly more difficult. 6 M. B. Skelly et al Figure 3. Fits (lines) and deconvolved profiles (symbols) for TWA 6 during Feb 2006. The fits for 11–13th are shown in the two boxes on the left, and those for the 17–20th are in the two on the right. The numbers on the right of the plots are the rotational phase at time of observation. The error bars for the data are drawn. The larger error bars in the last 11 profiles in the second box are due to the removal of a feature due to Moonlight in the spectra. Table 3. Previously-known and updated parameters for TWA 6. References: [1]: Zuckerman & Song (2004), [2]: Cohen & Kuhi (1979), [3]: Webb et al. (1999), [4]:Lawson & Crause (2005), [5]: (D'Antona & Mazzitelli 1994). Parameter Spectral type Temp. [K] V magnitude V − R Distance [pc] v sin i [kms−1] Period [day] Inclination [◦] Radius [R⊙] Mass [M⊙] Lum. [L⊙] Previous Value K7 – 12 1.19 51 ± 5 55 ± 10 0.54 ± 0.01 – – – 0.16+0.13 −0.08 New Value Reference K7 4000 ± 200 – – – 72 ± 1 0.5409 ± 0.00005 47+10 −8 1.05+0.16 −0.15 0.7 ± 0.2 0.25 ± 0.04 [1] [2] [3] [2] [1] [3], this work [4], this work this work this work [5], this work [3], this work ing the star has high spot filling factors and sizable tem- perature differences on the surface. This may explain the previous identification of the TWA 6 as a binary star in Jayawardhana et al. (2006), as the presence of a large dis- tortion at the line–centre may cause it to be mistaken for a double-lined binary. The maps given by these fits are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. In all maps white represents a zero spot–filling factor and a temperature of 4000K, black represents complete spot– filling and a temperature of 3300K. Both maps show a polar spot and features extending out of it down to lower latitudes and some isolated spots near the equator. The features are consistent between the two maps, and both are consistent with Fig. 6 which was obtained by fitting both datasets si- multaneously. The structure of the polar spot can be seen more clearly in Fig. 7, which shows the star in a flattened polar projection. High latitude and polar spots are not observed on the Sun, but the presence of a polar spot is common to other young K stars e.g. LO Peg, (Barnes et al. 2005b) and V410 Tau, (Schmidt et al. 2005). In rapidly rotating stars polar spots have been explained by Coriolis forces causing mag- netic flux tubes to rise almost parallel to the rotational axis (Schuessler & Solanki 1992). Magnetohydrodynamical cal- culations in Caligari et al. (1994) confirmed that for stars with high rotational velocities and deep convection zones high spot emergence latitudes are expected. Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6 7 Figure 4. Doppler image produced from the data from 11–13th Feb 2006, shown as a Mercator projection. White represents a zero spot–filling factor and a temperature of 4000K, black represents complete spot–filling and a temperature of 3300K. The greyscale is shown on the right hand side, and latitude on the left. Tick- marks along the bottom edge of the map show the phase coverage of the data.The average filling factor f is 9.5%. Figure 6. As Fig. 4 for the combination of both data sets. The average filling factor is 9.5%. Figure 5. As Fig. 4 for the second set of data (from 17–20th Feb 2006). The average filling factor is 10.7%. Granzer et al. (2000) carried out simulations of flux tube emergence in stars with a variety of rotation rates and masses. According to these models, for a TTS with a mass of 0.7 M⊙ and an angular velocity 50 times that of the Sun, the predominate flux tube emergence should be within a latitude range 60 − 90◦. The lower latitude spots are not predicted. In the model for rapidly rotating stars (Ω > 10 Ω⊙) with very small radiative cores the Coriolis force is expected to overwhelm the buoyancy forces. The flux tubes detach from the overshoot layer altogether and the resulting flux rings rise close to the pole, giving rise to little spot emergence be- low 60◦. TWA 6 has spot emergence at all latitudes above the equator, and the spot distribution looks more like that for a 1.0 M⊙ star. However given the uncertainty in its mass this is not unreasonable. Figure 7. A polar projection of the Doppler map for the full dataset for 11-20th February 2006. Dotted circles are at latitude intervals of 30◦, the solid circle is at the equator. Longitude inter- vals of 30◦ are also shown . The numbers around the edge show phases from 0–1, corresponding to those given in Fig 3. Tickmarks are placed at phases where observations were made. 4.4 Photometric Lightcurves The Doppler images produced in section 4.3 were used to produce monochromatic synthetic lightcurves centred at B,V and I. The results were double peaked profiles with the secondary peak being about one-eighth the size of the pri- mary. Photometry is often used as a constraint on spot sizes, e.g Vogt et al. (1999), however contemporaneous photome- try of TWA 6 does not exist. We can qualitatively compare our lightcurves with the photometry in Lawson & Crause (2005), taken in March 2000. In doing this we are not in- tending to directly compare the lightcurves, as several years elapsed between the two sets of measurements, only to check that our spot maps are plausible in light of previous results. As the central wavelength of our LSD profiles is ∼ 5500A comparison should be made with the V band pho- tometry. The amplitude of the variability, 0.1 magnitudes is around one-fifth of the value measured by Lawson & Crause 8 M. B. Skelly et al (2005) (∆V = 0.5). At first sight this suggests that the spot coverage when our measurements were made was rather dif- ferent to when the photometry in Lawson & Crause (2005) was carried out. It should however be noted that it is rather difficult to reliably recover the amplitude of the variation us- ing spectroscopy alone as spots at low latitudes will be given less weight in Doppler imaging, and the amplitude will be underestimated, see e.g. Unruh et al. (1995). The lightcurve amplitude of ∆V = 0.5 magnitudes is large compared to other WTTS, where amplitudes of ∼ 0.1 are more typical. A check should therefore be made to make sure our spot/photospheric flux differences are realistic. A simple calculation suggests that a spot coverage of approxi- mately 40% on one hemisphere (i.e. 20% of the total surface) can recreate the observed brightness change. By using DoTS to produce synthetic images effects like limb darkening can be taken into account. Using our spot temperature of 3300K a lightcurve with an amplitude of 0.5 can be produced with a gaussian spot at 30◦ latitude and a mean spot-filling fac- tor of 9%. Such a spot has a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 13◦. The mean filling–factor in the images in Figs. 4, 5 and 6 is 10%. This suggests that there was only one major spot group in 2000 whereas in 2006 there were rel- atively large mid-latitude spots apart from the main group at phase 0.0. Hence it is likely that a combination of un- derestimation of the variability using Doppler imaging and a change in the spot coverage over the intervening years causes the discrepancy. There is certainly a case for further photometry on this object, as subsequent sections will show. 4.5 Differential Rotation Figs. 4 and 5 show close agreement between the spots in the two datasets. Fig. 8 shows the contours of the second map overlaid on the greyscale image of the first. The two images in this case were constructed using similar phases in order to remove differences that may arise due to the differ- ent phase coverage of the two datasets. The alignment of the spots suggests that there is no strong differential rotation in TWA 6. The main differences are in the spots at lower lati- tudes, where the spots in the greyscale seem slightly larger. However given the difficulties in determining the exact lati- tudinal extent and weight of low-latitude features some dif- ferences are to be expected. There is no strong evidence of the meridional circulation of the type referred to in section 1.2. To quantify the differential rotation more rigorously the two images were cross-correlated at each latitude band with a range of longitude shifts. If differential rotation of the type observed in the Sun was occurring this would be apparent as the band of maximum correlation would curve towards negative longitude shifts at higher latitudes. A solar-type differential rotation can be described by Ω(φ) = Ω0 − ∆Ωsin2φ, (1) where Ω0 is the angular velocity of the star at the equator, φ is the latitude and ∆Ω is the difference in angular velocities between the equator and the poles. Fig. 9 plots the value of the cross correlation in a latitude range 0 − 70◦. There is no apparent curvature in the position of the maximum corre- lation. An upper limit on ∆Ω can be calculated by fitting gaussians to each latitude band in the cross correlation. At Figure 8. The greyscale image from first dataset overlaid with the contours of the second for the northern hemisphere. The two images were reconstructed using similar phases. Figure 9. Cross correlation of the first map with the second. The solid white line shows the maximum correlation at each latitude. The black curves are a contour map of the velocity represented by each part of the cross-correlation image. ∆v is the velocity resolution of the instrument (6.7 km s−1). each 10◦ latitude band between 0 − 70◦ the mean position of the gaussian peak is always within one pixel of 0◦ (one pixel corresponds to 2◦). At higher latitudes it becomes more diffi- cult to cross-correlate the images due to the large polar spot and lower velocity ranges at those latitudes. At lower lati- tudes the width of the gaussian can provide an upper limit to the differential rotation. The mean width of the gaussians between 0 − 50◦ (where most of the isolated spots are) gives an upper limit on ∆Ω of 0.04 rad day−1. Carrying out a similar cross-correlation, but this time comparing longitude bands between the two images, allows us to investigate whether the star exhibits differential ro- tation along the meridional direction. As before, a gaussian was fitted to each band in the correlation image (not shown), the mean FWHM of these gaussians gives an upper limit on this form of differential rotation of 0.02 rad day−1. As a further constraint on the differential rotation DoTS was used to explore the parameter space to find the values which give the minimum χ2. The relevant parameters which should be varied can be found in equation 1. The differential Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6 9 Figure 10. A plot of the χ2 value for a variety of angular speeds and differential rotation values, where Ω0 and ∆Ω are as in equa- tion 1. The χ2 values are given in the bar at the bottom. The min- imum χ2, at the '+' in the plot, is at Ω = 11.616 rad day−1 (cor- responding to a period of 0.54091 d) and ∆Ω = 0.0 rad day−1. The smallest contour is at a χ2 of 2.376, and approximately cor- responds to the 3σ confidence level. rotation of the star can be parameterised using ∆Ω, but Ω0 must be varied simultaneously, equivalent to varying the period and differential rotation. The result of this is shown in Fig. 10, which is a two-dimensional plot of χ2 against differential rotation and the angular velocity. We find that the minimum χ2 is at period = 0.54091 day and differential rotation = 0.00 rad day−1, further evidence that the star does not have differential rotation. By drawing contours of ∆χ2 confidence levels can be placed on the values of Ω0 and ∆Ω obtained. When us- ing χ2 minimization to find a parameter value there is a 67% probability of the true value lying in the range where ∆χ2 6 1 (Press 2002). The 1σ confidence level therefore lies at ∆χ2 = 1. As our minimum χ2 is more than 1.0 all the χ2 values must be divided by the minimum χ2. The surface is then multiplied by the number of degrees of freedom in the fit, i.e. the number of spectral data points used to create the Doppler image. The 1σ confidence level indicates that differential rotation lies within the range ±0.003 rad day−1. 5 BALMER LINE ANALYSIS Balmer lines are a useful probe of the circumstellar environ- ment of TTS. Hα emission is formed in the stellar chromo- sphere, disc and wind when hydrogen atoms are ionised by photons from the stellar surface. When a prominence lies in front of the stellar disc from our point of view most of the Balmer line photons will scattered out of our line-of-sight, so prominences in front of the stellar disc appear in absorp- tion. When the prominence is off the stellar disc the photons will be scattered into our line-of-sight and the prominence appears in emission. Fig. 11 shows the mean Hα and Hβ profile shapes for the spectra in the first and second datasets. The raw profiles Figure 11. Mean Hα profiles (top) and Hβ (bottom). In each plot the upper set of lines shows the normalised mean profile for the first dataset (solid line) and second dataset (dashed line). The lower set of lines are the mean profile with a rotationally broad- ened absorption profile subtracted off. The template spectrum was rotationally broadened to the v sin i of TWA 6 (72 km s−1), shifted to an appropriate radial velocity, scaled and subtracted. The telluric lines have been divided out. For Hα the unsubtracted and subtracted lines have an equivalent width of 5A and 4.2A re- spectively, while for Hβ it is 1.2A and 1.0A. are shown on top and underneath a broadened absorption spectrum has been subtracted off. The absorption spectrum was created by broadening the normalised template K7 spec- trum to a v sin i of 72 km s−1. The telluric lines have been removed. Both Hα and Hβ profiles have a narrow component with a FWHM of 110 km s−1and 113 km s−1 respectively. This in good agreement with the expected FWHM of a ro- tationally broadened spectral line for a star with a v sin i of 72 km s−1, which is 112 km s−1 (Gray 1992) if a limb dark- ening of 0.88 is assumed (Al-Naimiy 1978). The subtracted Hα profiles have additional broad wings. These are more prominent on the blue side. The subtracted Hβ profiles by contrast appear to only have a narrow component. The presence of a broad component on the Hα emission is supported by the calculation of the variance profile, shown in Fig. 12. As described in Johns & Basri (1995) this is is calculated using Vλ = hPn i=1(Iλ,i − Iλ)2 (n − 1) i1/2 . (2) 10 M. B. Skelly et al Figure 12. The normalised variance profiles for Hα. The solid line is the variance profiles for the first dataset and the dashed line is for the second dataset. This shows variance out to ±250 km s−1. The small peak at ∼ −350 km s−1 is due to the presence of an absorption line. Fig. 12 shows that the Hα emission varies out to ±250 km s−1, well beyond the v sin i of 72 km s−1. A similar calculation was carried out for Hβ but this showed negligible variability off the stellar disc and has not been shown here. Figs. 13 and 14 are greyscale images of Hα divided by a mean profile, at narrow and wide velocity scales, shown with the LSD profiles for comparison. In the left and centre images of Fig 13 there is a strong similarity between the LSD and Hα profiles. The bright regions coincide in these images, suggesting that the spots on the photosphere correspond with active Hα regions. The equivalent Hβ image has similar features, although it is noisier and has not been shown. The SNR in Hα is lower than for the LSD as the LSD profiles have been produced using about 2000 lines; we are thus not able to resolve fine detail in the Hα images that we can see in the LSD image. The correspondence is less clear between phases 0 – 0.4 in Fig. 13 than in phases 0.4 – 1.0. There is a dark feature at around 50 km s−1 in the Hα which is making the contrast more difficult to see. In Fig. 14 there is also similarity, be- tween phases 0 – 0.4 some of the bright regions coincide. At phases 0.4 – 0.6 in the Hα there are dark features masking any possible correspondence but there is some correspon- dence between phases 0.6 – 1.0. Fig. 15 shows the LSD image with the contours of the Hα on top. Both images have been smoothed. The tick marks show the direction of decreasing intensity. The straight horizontal edges in the contour plot are where the phase coverage was incomplete. The alignment between the bright regions is apparent in the left hand image for phase 0.4 – 1.0. In the right hand image alignment appears to be present between phases 0.6 – 1.0 only. Note that we have as- sumed Sun-like rotation, so a phase of 0.4 corresponds to a longitude of 216◦. Hence the increased Hα emission appears to associated with the group of spots between 60 − 220◦. The behaviour implied by Fig 13 is similar to the Sun but has not often been observed in other stars. While low-lying plages have been inferred previously, e.g. Donati & Collier Cameron (1997), Fern´andez et al. (2004), we believe that this is the first observation of such a clear alignment of phases and velocities, indicating that the plages are overlying the spots. This is in contrast to observations of earlier type stars such as AB Dor and Speedy Mic where the dominant signal is from higher-lying prominences (known as 'slingshot prominences'). Also shown on the right-hand sides Fig 13 and 14 is Hα variability within a velocity range of ±500 km s−1. There are features well outside the v sin i of the star, suggesting that slingshot prominences can be seen in emission off the stellar disc. In particular there is a bright emission feature in Fig 13 that is can be fitted with a sinusoid, shown in Fig. 16. In this figure the image has been smoothed and the contrast has been enhanced, and a sinusoid has been overplotted. The maximum velocity of this sinusoid is 285 km s−1. If we assume the prominence is corotating with the star then it is lying at a height of about 4R∗. The star has a corotation ra- dius of 2.4R∗. Jardine & van Ballegooijen (2005) show that a star of this corotation radius can support prominences out to 4.8R∗. The model assumes that the prominences are em- bedded in the wind rather than an extended corona. Sling- shot prominences have not been detected before in T Tauri stars – their presence suggests that the star can support stable structures beyond corotation. Other explanations for this large velocity range should also be considered. For example, there may be infalling gas, close to the surface but with a maximum velocity component along our line of sight of around 285 km s−1. The observed velocity will vary sinusoidally as the star rotates. Unless the gas is falling directly onto the equator the magnitude of the velocity would not be the same at phases separated by 0.5, as they appear to be here. However if it was on the equator we would not see it for part of the rotation as the inclination of the star would cause it to go out of sight. The spectra plotted in Fig. 13 were taken over 3 nights, corresponding to about 5.5 rotational periods. All the spec- tra used in Fig. 13 were taken on either the first or third day of observations. Most taken on the third day lie in the phase range 0.5 – 0.7 where the brightening is less obvious, which implies that the prominence was only present on the first night. However there are two spectra from the third night in the phase range 0.7 – 1.0 which do support the presence of a prominence, in particular the line at phase ∼ 0.75 shows a brightening at velocities ∼ 300 km s−1. The prominence may be less apparent at phase 0.5 – 0.7 because it is on the far side of the star at that time and is obscured by circum- stellar material. In Fig. 14 there are features outside v sin i that may be evidence of more slingshot prominences, particularly be- tween phases 0.6 – 1.0. However they do not seem to be present at other phases and there is not enough information to justify identifying them as prominences. Also, as they are not at the same phases as the prominence in Fig. 13 it is clear that this prominence has not survived the 5 days be- tween the two sets of observations, suggesting lifetimes of the order of a few days. 6 CONCLUSIONS Spectra of TWA 6 were taken at AAT/UCLES during two epochs separated by approximately nine rotational periods. Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6 11 Figure 13. Greyscale images for the first set of data (covering 11 – 13th Feb 2006). From left to right, the normalised decon- volved profiles from Fig 2; the normalised Hα at velocity range ±90km s−1 (bin width 4.2 km s−1) and the normalised Hα at velocity range ±500km s−1 (bin widths 17 km s−1). The scale of the centre and right images is given by the bar at the bottom, while the scale of the left image is as in Fig. 2. The similarity between the left and central images should be noted, the bright regions correspond, particularly from phase 0.4 – 1.0. In the right- hand image there is a sinusoidal feature with an amplitude of 285 km s−1, see also Fig, 16. Figure 15. LSD profiles shown in greyscale, overlaid with the contours of the Hα profiles, for 11–13th Feb (left) and 17–20th Feb 2006 (right). The LSD and Hα profiles are as in Fig. 13 and 14 but they have been smoothed. Figure 14. As Fig. 13 for the second set of data, covering 17– 20th Feb 2006. The scale bar refers to the centre and right images, the left image is as in Fig. 2. Figure 16. Hα variability overplotted with a sinusoid indicating the position of a slingshot prominence. The maximum velocity is 285 km s−1. The vertical lines are at ±v sin i, i.e. ± 72 km s−1. Using these spectra and Doppler imaging two maps of its spot distribution were produced. The spot distribution of TWA 6 is qualitatively similar to other T Tauri stars, e.g LO Peg, (Barnes et al. 2005b) and V410 Tau, (Schmidt et al. 2005), with the predominate spot emergence at high lati- tudes and spots all the way to the equator. In the Sun photospheric spots are often coincident with 'plages', active regions in the chromosphere, usually ob- served using a Hα filter. The Hα emission of TWA 6 in- dicates that the active chromospheric regions are cospatial with the photospheric spots - similar to the behaviour of the Sun. This supports previous findings that Hα emis- sion in young stars increases when spot coverage is larger (Donati & Collier Cameron (1997), Fern´andez et al. (2004)) but here we have, for the first time, a strong indication that the plages are overlying the spots. TWA 6 appears to support slingshot prominences, the first such observation in a T Tauri star. At least one promi- 12 M. B. Skelly et al nence is observed, lying at a velocity of 285 km s−1 which corresponds to a radial distance of 4R∗ from the axis. There is evidence that the prominence survives for three days after the initial detection - suggesting that the structure is stable over at least 5.5 rotational periods. The presence of a stable slingshot prominence at a height of 3R∗ from the surface suggests that the star has a large-scale field. Further obser- vations of TWA 6 are justified in order to fully characterise its prominence system, as well as of other stars of similar age and spectral type to determine whether the behaviour set out in this paper is typical. The star has no differential rotation (upper limit 0.003 rad day−1), in line with the previously observed trend that differential rotation decreases with decreasing effective temperature and increasing rotational velocity. Earlier dif- ferential rotation measurements have been for older objects, here we have extended the observations to younger stars. The null–measurement is consistent with expectations for the spectral type and angular speed of TWA 6 and indi- cates that T Tauri stars exhibit solid–body rotation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to D. Mortlock and N. Dunstone for useful discus- sions; the staff at the AAT for their help during the observ- ing run and the anonymous referee for helpful comments. The Vienna Atomic Line Database provided the spectral line lists used, and the data reduction was carried out us- ing Starlink software. M. Skelly would like to acknowledge the financial support of STFC. WAL acknowledges financial support from UNSW@ADFA Faculty Research Grants. REFERENCES Al-Naimiy H. M., 1978, Astrophys. Sp. Sci. , 53, 181 Alexander D. R., Augason G. C., Johnson H. R., 1989, Collier Cameron A., 2001, in Boffin H. M. J., Steeghs D., Cuypers J., eds, Astrotomography, Indirect Imaging Methods in Observational Astronomy Vol. 573 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, Spot Mapping in Cool Stars. pp 183–+ Collier Cameron A., Campbell C. G., 1993, Astron. Astro- phys. , 274, 309 Collier Cameron A., Robinson R. D., 1989, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 236, 57 Collier-Cameron A., Unruh Y. C., 1994, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. , 269, 814 D'Antona F., Mazzitelli I., 1994, Astrophys. J. Suppl. , 90, 467 Dobler W., Stix M., Brandenburg A., 2006, Astrophys. J. , 638, 336 Donati J.-F., Semel M., Carter B. D., Rees D. E., Collier Cameron A., 1997, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 291, 658 Donati J.-F., Collier Cameron A., 1997, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. , 291, 1 Donati J.-F., Collier Cameron A., Hussain G. A. J., Semel M., 1999, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 302, 437 Dunstone N. J., Barnes J. R., Cameron A. C., Jardine M., 2006, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 365, 530 Fern´andez M., Stelzer B., Henden A., Grankin K., Gameiro J. F., Costa V. M., Guenther E., Amado P. J., Rodriguez E., 2004, Astron. Astrophys. , 427, 263 Granzer T., Schussler M., Caligari P., Strassmeier K. G., 2000, Astron. Astrophys. , 355, 1087 Gray D. F., 1992, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres. Cambridge University Press Hayashi C., 1966, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , 4, 171 Jardine M., van Ballegooijen A. A., 2005, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. , 361, 1173 Jayawardhana R., Coffey J., Scholz A., Brandeker A., van Kerkwijk M. H., 2006, Astrophys. J. , 648, 1206 Johns C. M., Basri G., 1995, Astron. J. , 109, 2800 Kitchatinov L. L., Rudiger G., 1999, Astron. Astrophys. , 344, 911 Astrophys. J. , 345, 1014 Krist J. E., Stapelfeldt K. R., M´enard F., Padgett D. L., Armitage P. J., Clarke C. J., Palla F., 2003, Burrows C. J., 2000, Astrophys. J. , 538, 793 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 342, 1139 Kuerster M., Schmitt J. H. M. M., Cutispoto G., 1994, Barnes J. R., Cameron A. C., Donati J.-F., James D. J., Marsden S. C., Petit P., 2005a, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 357, L1 Barnes J. R., Cameron A. C., Lister T. A., Pointer G. R., Still M. D., 2005b, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 356, 1501 Barnes J. R., Collier Cameron A., Unruh Y. C., Donati J. F., Hussain G. A. J., 1998, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 299, 904 Bertout C., 1989, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , 27, 351 Bouvier J., Cabrit S., Fernandez M., Martin E. L., Astron. Astrophys. , 289, 899 Kupka F. G., Ryabchikova T. A., Piskunov N. E., Stempels H. C., Weiss W. W., 2000, Baltic Astronomy, 9, 590 Kurucz R. L., 1991, in Crivellari L., Hubeny I., Hummer D. G., eds, NATO ASIC Proc. 341: Stellar Atmospheres - Beyond Classical Models New Opacity Calculations. pp 441–+ Lawson W. A., Crause L. A., 2005, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. , 357, 1399 Mills D., Webb J., Clayton M., 1997, Starlink User Note Matthews J. M., 1993, Astron. Astrophys. , 272, 176 152.4 Bouvier J., Forestini M., Allain S., 1997, Astron. Astro- phys. , 326, 1023 Caligari P., Schussler M., Stix M., Solanki S. K., 1994, in Caillault J.-P., ed., Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun Vol. 64 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Confer- ence Series, Distribution of Magnetic Flux on the Surface of Rapidly Rotating Stars. pp 387–+ Morin J., Donati J. ., Forveille T., Delfosse X., Dobler W., Petit P., Jardine M. M., Cameron A. C., Albert L., Manset N., Dintrans B., Chabrier G., Valenti J. A., 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 711 Petit P., Donati J.-F., Collier Cameron A., 2004, As- tronomische Nachrichten, 325, 221 Press W. H., 2002, Numerical recipes in C++ : the art of Chabrier G., Kuker M., 2006, Astron. Astrophys. , 446, scientific computing. ISBN : 0521750334 1027 Rice J. B., Strassmeier K. G., 1996, Astron. Astrophys. , Cohen M., Kuhi L. V., 1979, Astrophys. J. Suppl. , 41, 743 316, 164 Doppler Images and Chromospheric Variability of TWA 6 13 Schmidt T., Guenther E., Hatzes A. P., Ries C., Hart- mann M., Ohlert J. M., Lehmann H., 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 667 Schuessler M., Solanki S. K., 1992, Astron. Astrophys. , 264, L13 Siess L., Dufour E., Forestini M., 2000, Astron. Astrophys. , 358, 593 Skilling J., Bryan R. K., 1984, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 211, 111 Strassmeier K. G., 2002, Astronomische Nachrichten, 323, 309 Unruh Y. C., Collier Cameron A., Cutispoto G., 1995, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 277, 1145 Vogt S. S., Hatzes A. P., Misch A. A., Kurster M., 1999, Astrophys. J. Suppl. , 121, 547 Vogt S. S., Penrod G. D., 1983, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. , 95, 565 Webb R. A., Zuckerman B., Platais I., Patience J., White R. J., Schwartz M. J., McCarthy C., 1999, Astro- phys. J. Lett. , 512, L63 Yang H., Johns-Krull C. M., Valenti J. A., 2007, Astron. J. , 133, 73 Zuckerman B., Song I., 2004, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys. , 42, 685
astro-ph/0602136	1	0602	2006-02-06T21:04:48	A stellar companion in the HD 189733 system with a known transiting extrasolar planet	[ "astro-ph" ]	We show that the very close-by (19 pc) K0 star HD 189733, already found to be orbited by a transiting giant planet, is the primary of a double-star system, with the secondary being a mid-M dwarf with projected separation of about 216 AU from the primary. This conclusion is based on astrometry, proper motion and radial velocity measurements, spectral type determination and photometry. We also detect differential proper motion of the secondary. The data appear consistent with the secondary orbiting the primary in a clockwise orbit, lying nearly in the plane of the sky (that is, nearly perpendicular to the orbital plane of the transiting planet), and with period about 3200 years.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version April 10, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/14/05 6 0 0 2 b e F 6 1 v 6 3 1 2 0 6 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a A STELLAR COMPANION IN THE HD 189733 SYSTEM WITH A KNOWN TRANSITING EXTRASOLAR PLANET G´asp´ar ´A. Bakos1,2, Andr´as P´al3,1, David W. Latham1, Robert W. Noyes1, Robert P. Stefanik1 Draft version April 10, 2018 ABSTRACT We show that the very close-by (19 pc) K0 star HD 189733, already found to be orbited by a transiting giant planet, is the primary of a double-star system, with the secondary being a mid- M dwarf with projected separation of about 216 AU from the primary. This conclusion is based on astrometry, proper motion and radial velocity measurements, spectral type determination and photometry. We also detect differential proper motion of the secondary. The data appear consistent with the secondary orbiting the primary in a clockwise orbit, lying nearly in the plane of the sky (that is, nearly perpendicular to the orbital plane of the transiting planet), and with period about 3200 years. Subject headings: stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs -- stars: individual: HD 189733 -- stars: individual: HD 189733B -- planetary systems -- binaries (including multiple) 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EVIDENCE THAT HD 189733 HAS A PHYSICAL Of the ∼ 170 exoplanets in 146 planetary systems known at the present time4, the majority (∼ 160) are revealed only by the reflex velocity of their par- ent stars, (e.g. Mayor & Queloz 1995; Marcy & Butler 1996), yielding their periods, eccentricities, semi-major axes, and m sin i values. However, a small number (9) of the known exoplanets transit their host stars, so that the inclination ambiguity is removed and -- assuming a mass and radius for the primary -- their actual mass and radius, hence their mean density may be determined. A number of the known exoplanets have been found to occur in multiple stellar systems. The small sam- ple of 22 such systems form an important class of ob- jects (for references, see: Eggenberger et al. 2004b, 2005; Mugrauer et al. 2004a,b, 2005a). Until now, however, no planet found in a multiple stellar system also transits its parent star. In this Letter, we note that the parent star of the recently-discovered transiting extra-solar planet HD 189733b (Bouchy et al. 2005, hereafter B05) is itself a member of a double-star system. In §2 we present the evidence that the star HD 189733 has a physical companion star. Specifically, §2.1 shows that it has a common proper-motion companion; §2.2 shows that the companion's radial velocity is the same as HD 189733 within uncertainties; and §2.3 shows that the companion is a red dwarf star which must lie at ap- proximately the same distance as HD 189733. For these combined reasons the co-moving companion, now labeled HD 189733B, almost certainly must be a true physical companion. In §3 we detect a differential proper mo- tion, and obtain an initial estimate of the orbital motion of HD 189733B about HD 189733. Finally, §4 discusses some implications of this finding, and avenues for future work. Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), 60 Gar- den Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Hubble Fellow 3 Eotvos Lor´and University, Department of Astronomy, H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32., Hungary 4 http://vo.obspm.fr/exoplanetes/encyclo/index.php COMPANION STAR HD 189733 is a close-by (D = 19.3 ± 0.3pc) K0 dwarf, with mass of 0.82 ± 0.03M⊙ and other properties as described in B05. The 2MASS survey (Cutri et al. 2003) lists a nearby red star, 2MASS 20004297+2242342 (J = 10.12 ± 0.04, H = 9.55 ± 0.08, KS = 9.32 ± 0.03, J − KS = 0.8), some 3.7 magnitudes fainter in KS and 5 magnitudes fainter in V (estimated from J, H, KS). This star has an angular separation of 11.2′′ from HD 189733, lying 10.2′′ W and 4.6′′ to the S. HD 189733 is not listed in the Washington Double Star Catalogue (WDS; Mason et al. 2001), but here we will show that 2MASS 20004297+2242342 is in fact its phys- ical companion; in anticipation of that result we hence- forth denote the companion as HD 189733B. Note that the latter name is distinct from HD 189733b, the name given by B05 to the planetary companion to HD 189733. Our conclusion that the two stars form a bound binary system is based on the following evidence. 2.1. Common Proper Motion HD 189733 has a relatively high proper motion of µα = −2.49 ± 0.68 mas yr−1 and µδ = −250.81 ± 0.53 mas yr−1(Hipparcos; Perryman et al. 1997). To deter- mine whether HD 189733 and HD 189733B share com- mon proper motion, and hence may be members of the same physical system, we have inspected the follow- ing archival material: i) the digitized Palomar Observa- tory Sky Survey (POSS) scans5 (POSS-I, 1951 R-band; POSS-II, 1990 R-band, 1992 B-band, and 1996 I-band); ii) the HST QuickV survey (1982, R-band), iii) the 2MASS6 2000 J-, H- and K-band scans (Skrutskie et al. 2000). in November 2005, we used the TopHAT telescope of the HAT Network at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory (FLWO), to obtain I- band images. We also acquired 8 short exposure I-band frames in December 2005 with KeplerCam on the 1.2m telescope at FLWO. In addition, 5 http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss form 6 http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/ 2 Bakos et al. 1951 POSS−I, R 1982 QuickV, R 1992 POSS−II IR, I 1999 2MASS K N G 30" W X B X D E B G B Fig. 1. -- HD 189733 in four different epochs on registered frames. The known proper motion to the South is well visible. The upper dashed line shows the declination in 1951, and the lower dashed line for 1999. The companion HD 189733B is not visible on the POSS-I frame (left panel) because HD 189733 is over-saturated and the scan resolution is not adequate. HD 189733B (indicated by B) is visible on the rest of the panels, displaced to the SW by ∼ 11′′ from HD 189733; it is seen increasingly better from left to right, as the companion is relatively brighter at increasingly longer wavelengths (R, I and K bands). "X" denotes a faint star visible on POSS-I and the QuickV scans, before the Southward moving HD 189733B merges with it. "D" and "E" mark two faint stars that are visible on all of the frames, but one of the artificial filter glints ("G") merges with their position on the 2MASS frame. We used our home-grown fihat software environment (P´al et al. 2006, in preparation) to find sources on all the above images (∼50 isolated, non-saturated stars), cross-match them by rejecting outliers, determine the as- trometric mapping between the images, and transform them to the same reference system. Visual inspection of the registered frames show i) the prominent Southward proper motion of HD 189733 (in harmony with the Hip- parcos values), ii) a much fainter co-moving companion that we identify as HD 189733B (for details, see Fig. 1). The companion is clearly separated from HD 189733 on the 2MASS J, H and K scans (Fig. 1, right panel), and is listed in the 2MASS point source catalogue as 2MASS 20004297+2242342. Although not illustrated on Fig. 1, the co-movement is also demonstrated by the TopHAT and FLWO 1.2m I-band frames. No other co- moving companion is detected on these frames. To quantify the proper motion of HD 189733B, we have carried out astrometry on the QuickV, POSS-II, 2MASS, TopHAT and FLWO1.2m observations. We used the 2MASS catalogue as astrometric reference, where the quoted position uncertainty of bright, isolated sources is 120mas. We used the previously established pixel cen- ters of ∼ 50 un-saturated stars that we found by fit- ting Gaussian profiles. By running our fihat/fistar star-finder algorithm on artificially generated frames, we found typical errors of the centroid positions to be on the order of 0.05pix (corresponding to 0.08′′ on QuickV, 0.05′′ on POSS-II and 2MASS, and 0.1′′ on TopHAT and 0.07′′ on FLWO1.2m). We then derived the second or- der astrometric mappings between the X,Y coordinates and the 2MASS astrometric reference (HD 189733(B) were omitted from the fit), and used this to transform the pixel coordinates of the frames to the ICRS (α, δ; Seidelmann & Kovalevsky 2002) system used by 2MASS. The rms around the fit was ∼ 0.2′′ for QuickV, ∼ 0.18′′ for POSS-II, ∼ 0.05′′ for 2MASS, ∼ 0.3′′ for TopHAT, and 0.1′′ for the FLWO1.2m, respectively. The derived proper motion of HD 189733B is µα,B = −4.1±9 mas yr−1, µδ,B = −264±12 mas yr−1(see Fig. 2), which are within 2σ of the Hipparcos proper motion of HD 189733 itself. Therefore, it is clear that, within un- certainties, HD 189733 and HD 189733B share a com- mon proper motion and so are likely to comprise a bound system. ] c e s c r a [ 0 A R - A R 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -15 -10 -5 0 5 -15 -10 -5 0 5 Epoch - Epoch0 (2MASS H 1999) [yr] Epoch - Epoch0 (2MASS H 1999) [yr] 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 ] c e s c r a [ 0 c e D - c e D Fig. 2. -- Proper motion of HD 189733B in RA (left) and Dec (right) relative to the 2MASS 1999 position. The two panels are on the same scale. The central solid lines show the linear fit to the data; the two other solid lines show the same fits using slope and intersection parameters differing by ±1σ. For reference, the dashed line shows the relative proper motion of HD 189733 from Hipparcos, offset by 1.0 arcsec for clarity. 2.2. Radial Velocity A common radial velocity is a further indication that the two stars are physically associated. In order to test this possibility, we obtained spectroscopic observations of both the primary star and the suspected companion, us- ing the Center for Astrophysics (CfA) Digital Speedome- ter (DS; Latham 1992) at the 1.5m Tillinghast telescope of FLWO, Arizona. Seven DS observations have been made of the star HD 189733 dating back to 1995, with the two most re- cent being 2005 Dec 10 and Dec 17. For each of these a radial velocity was obtained on the CfA Native Sys- tem velocity reference (Stefanik et al. 1999). The mean and standard deviation of these measurements is Vrad = −2.38 ± 0.20 km s−1, with no significant evidence for a long-term velocity variation over the past 10 years. For HD 189733B, two DS observations were made, on 2005 Dec 10 and 17, yielding a mean radial velocity Vrad,B = −3.1 ± 1.0 km s−1. Thus, within observational uncertainties the difference in measured velocities is con- sistent with the two stars being physical companions. A stellar companion in the HD 189733 system 3 2.3. Characteristics of the Star HD 189733B There is still a remote chance that the apparent com- panion could be a distant giant star with high tangential velocity or a very close-by low luminosity and velocity sub-dwarf, that happens to have the same sky position, radial velocity, and proper motion. While the DS has the primary goal of radial-velocity measurements, correlation of the spectrum with template spectra based on the Kurucz (1993) models also yields in- formation on Teff, log g and stellar rotation v sin i. We obtained log g = 4.5 ± 0.3 -- a value appropriate to a main sequence M dwarf. Correlation with observed spec- tra of M dwarfs with spectral type ranging from M0.0 to M5.5 gives best correlation near M3.5. We also observed HD 189733B with the FAST spectrograph on the FLWO 1.5m telescope. Visual comparison of the resulting spec- tra to known M dwarf spectra suggests a spectral type of M4V. Based on its spectral type, plus apparent magni- tude, we then infer a distance to HD 189733B consistent with the 19.3 pc distance to HD 189733 . 6 6.5 7 7.5 H M 8 HD189733B 8.5 9 9.5 HD196050B 0.4 0.35 0.3 HD114729B 0.25 0.2 HD213240B HD75289B 0.175 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.1 10 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 J-K Fig. 3. -- Location of HD 189733B on the (Baraffe et al. 1998) 5Gyr isochrone with other M-dwarf binary companions of stars with known planets, plotted from Eggenberger et al. (2004b). Stel- lar masses are labeled along the isochrone in units of M⊙. We independently estimated the spectral type of HD 189733B from 2MASS photometry. Because of the slightly overlapping profile of the close-by, bright HD 189733 we performed aperture photometry of HD 189733B on the 1999 2MASS scans after subtract- ing off the Gaussian profile of HD 189733, and using ∼ 50 isolated stars with original 2MASS photometry as reference. This analysis yields J = 10.147 ± 0.02, H = 9.551 ± 0.03, and KS = 9.318 ± 0.02. These val- ues are within 0.03mag of the 2MASS Point Source Cat- alogue values, but we find smaller errors, and slightly redder J − K color index. We transformed our mea- sured J − KS value (namely 0.829 ± 0.03), to J − K on the Bessell and Brett (BB) system following Carpenter (2005), to obtain (J − K)BB = 0.864 ± 0.04. Then we de- rived the absolute magnitude MH (8.13 ± 0.045) from our measured H magnitude and an assumed distance equal to that of HD 189733 and plotted these values on the color-magnitude diagram of Mugrauer et al. (2005a), which also plots a 5-Gyr isochrone from Baraffe et al. (1998). The position on the color magnitude diagram above analyses we From the (Fig. 3) corresponds to a stellar mass of 0.175 to 0.2M⊙, which according to Cox (2000) corresponds to an M dwarf with spectral type of about M5. The good fit to the isochrone supports our assumption that the distance to HD 189733B is similar to that to HD 189733. conclude that HD 189733B is an M dwarf with spectral type in the range M3.5 to M5, with common proper motion, radial velocity, and distance to HD 189733. The relative positions (from astrometry, and assuming equidistance), and relative velocities of the two stars (from proper motion and radial velocity data), along with the 1M⊙ total system mass, are consistent within 2σ with the system being gravitationally bound. Although it would formally be possible for an interloper M dwarf star to be passing very close to HD 189733 at the current epoch, with a relative speed so small as to make it almost gravitationally bound, this possibility is so remote that we conclude that the two stars do indeed form a bound system with projected separation about 216 AU. 3. ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECONDARY If the true separation of HD 189733 and HD 189733B is close to the projected separation, and the orbit is cir- cular, and the total system mass is ∼1M⊙ (0.82M⊙ for HD 189733 from B05 and 0.2M⊙ for HD 189733B from §2.3) then the orbital period is ∼3200 years, correspond- ing to ∼2km s−1 orbital motion. For a face on orbit this would yield an observable 22 mas yr−1 differential proper motion in addition to the co-movement. In an attempt to detect this, we used two pairs of 2MASS images in the H and K bands obtained in 1999 and 2000 (one of these is the right-hand image in Fig. 1), with mean epoch 2000.073, and compared them with the 8 high resolution I-band frames of the field taken with the FLWO 1.2m telescope at epoch 2005.970. We note that although the other data were useful in confirmation of the common proper motion (as shown in §2.1), because of the saturated HD 189733 image (POSS, Quick-V) and low S/N (TopHAT) they were not used in this precise as- trometry aimed at refining the differential proper motion. The astrometry of HD 189733 over the 5.897 year base- line yields a proper motion of µα = −8 ± 5 mas yr−1 and µδ = −245 ± 8 mas yr−1. Because this agrees with the more precise Hipparcos value within uncertainties (§2.1), we adopt that value for the proper motion of HD 189733. For HD 189733B we find µα,B = −3 ± 5 mas yr−1 and µδ,B = −272 ± 5 mas yr−1, which imply a differential proper motion relative to HD 189733 of ∆µα = −1 ± 5 mas yr−1 and ∆µδ = −21.2 ± 5 mas yr−1(Fig. 4). Formally, the data indicate a detection of relative proper motion at the 4σ level. The position of the com- panion, and its direction and magnitude of relative mo- tion, are consistent with orbital motion in a clockwise orbit roughly in the plane of the sky. However, there could be underlying systematic effects due to the different instruments and bandpasses used for the earlier-epoch 2MASS data and the later-epoch FLWO1.2 data. We estimated one of these, namely the effect of stellar profile merging of HD 189733B with HD 189733 that is different on the 2MASS and FLWO1.2m frames. By subtracting off the Gaussian pro- file of the primary, we found that the derived proper mo- tion of HD 189733B changed by only 2mas yr−1. Nev- 4 Bakos et al. ertheless, while the detection of orbital motion roughly in the plane of the sky seems secure, it is premature to derive specific orbital parameters for the system. -4.70 -4.75 -4.80 -4.85 -4.90 ) c e s c r a n i , h t r o N , 3 3 7 9 8 1 D H m o r f ( Y D -4.95 +10.00 2MASS FLWO1.2 +10.05 +10.20 DX (from HD189733, West, in arcsec) +10.15 +10.10 +10.25 Fig. 4. -- Differential proper motion of HD 189733B relative to HD 189733. Open squares and circles indicate individual 2MASS (epoch 2000.073) and FLWO1.2 (epoch 2005.970) data points re- spectively. Filled square and circle represent the mean of those respective data points, with error bars representing 1 standard deviation of those means. Dashed line depicts a circular orbital path about HD 189733 in the plane of the sky, passing through the 2MASS position. The triangle depicts the position at epoch 2005.973 for such an orbit. 4. DISCUSSION Several studies have been done on the characteristics of close-in planets orbiting the primary star of a mul- tiple star system. Thus Eggenberger et al. (2004b, and references therein) found a tendency for massive plan- ets (m sin i greater than 2MJ) to occur preferentially in multiple-star systems. However, HD 189733b is a low- mass planet (1.15MJwithout sin i ambiguity), and yet it is in a multiple stellar system, thus weakening the dis- tinction between single and multiple stars. HD 189733b exceeds all other known extrasolar plan- ets in binary systems in its proximity to its parent star (apl=0.031 AU). However, a number of planets in multiple-star systems are nearly as close (e.g. Tau Boo b, apl=0.05 AU; HD 75289b, apl=0.046 AU). The data suggest (see §3) that the binary orbit is likely to be nearly face on, i.e. the orbital plane would be nearly orthogonal to the orbital plane of the planet HD 189733b, which by virtue of its transit we know to have an inclination of nearly 90◦. A detailed calcu- lation based on the relative velocities and positions of the two stars shows that the orbit of HD 189733B and HD 189733b cannot be coplanar at the 4-σ level (P´al et al, in preparation). When additional transiting plan- ets are discovered in multiple star systems, it should be possible to study the relation of the system architecture (e.g. mass, semi-major axis of the stellar secondary) to planet properties in better detail. Because the HD 189733 system is so close-by, it should be possible to do excellent astrometry over the next few years with modern high precision astrometric techniques from ground or space. The changing radial velocity signal of either or both of HD 189733 and HD 189733B might also be detectable after a few years of monitoring with current high-precision radial velocity devices. High pre- cision proper motion and radial velocity measurements should lead to a good characterization of the orbital char- acteristics of the binary system and their relation to the orbit of the transiting planet. Finally, we note that because this system is only 19 pc from Earth and hence both stellar components are unusually bright for their spectral types, many addi- tional follow-on observations requiring high resolution spectroscopy or high precision photometry will be fea- sible. This should permit a full characterization of the system including the possible detection of additional low mass components. This work was funded by NASA grant NNG04GN74G. Work by G. ´A. B. was supported by NASA through grant HST-HF-01170.01-A Hubble Fellowship. A. P. wishes to acknowledge the hospitality of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, where part of this work has been carried out. Work of A. P. was also supported by Hungar- ian OTKA grant T-038437. D. W. L. and R. P. S thank the Kepler mission for support through NASA Coopera- tive Agreement NCC2-1390. We acknowledge the use of the 2MASS survey frames, and the Palomar Sky Survey digital scans. We thank Perry Berlind at FLWO for tak- ing the FAST spectra of HD 189733B, and Emilio Falco for the follow-up exposures using the 1.2m telescope. A. N. Cox. 2000, Allen's astrophysical quantities, 4th ed. Publisher: New York: AIP Press; Springer, 2000 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, Latham, D. W. 1992, ASP Conf. Ser. 32: IAU Colloq. 135, 32, 110 Marcy, G. W., & Butler, R. P. 1996, ApJ, 464, L147 Mason, B. D., Wycoff, G. L., Hartkopf, W. I., Douglass, G. G., & REFERENCES A&A, 337, 403 Bessell, M.S., Castelli, F., & Plez, B. 1998, A&A, 333, 231 Bouchy, F., et al. 2005, A&A, submitted, astro-ph/0510119 Carpenter, J. 2005, ApJ, 121, 2851 Charbonneau, D. et al. 2005, astro-ph/0508051 Cutri, R. M., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2246, Eggenberger, A., Udry, S., Mayor, M., Beuzit, J.-L., Lagrange, A. M., & Chauvin, G. 2004, ASP Conf. Ser. 321: Extrasolar Planets: Today and Tomorrow, 321, 93 Eggenberger, A., Udry, S., & Mayor, M. 2004, A&A, 417, 353 Eggenberger, A., Mayor, M., Naef, D., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., Santos, N. C., Udry, S., Lovis, C. astro-ph/0510561 Kervella, P., Th´evenin, Di Folco, E., & S´egransan, D. 2004, A&A, 426, 297 Kurucz, R. 1993, ATLAS9 CD-ROM No. 13. Cambridge, MA, SAO, 1993., 13 Worley, C. E. 2001, AJ, 122, 3466 Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355 Mugrauer, M., Neuhauser, R., Seifahrt, A., Mazeh, T., & Guenther, E. 2005, A&A, 440, 1051 Mugrauer, M., & Neuhauser, R. 2005, MNRAS, 361, L15 Mugrauer, M., Neuhauser, R., Mazeh, T., Guenther, E., & Fern´andez, M. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 718 Mugrauer, M., Neuhauser, R., Mazeh, T., Alves, J., & Guenther, E. 2004, A&A, 425, 249 Perryman, M. A. C., et al. 1997, A&A, 323, L29 Seidelmann, P. K., & Kovalevsky, J. 2002, A&A, 392, 341 Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1, 2003 Stefanik, R. P., Latham, D. W., & Torres, G. 1999, ASP Conf. Ser. 185: IAU Colloq. 170, 185, 354
astro-ph/0203040	2	0203	2002-06-24T09:27:19	Radiation from the Relativistic Jet: a Role of the Shear Boundary Layer	[ "astro-ph" ]	Recent radio and optical large scale jets' observations suggest a two-component jet morphology, consisting of a fast central spine surrounded with a boundary layer with a velocity shear. We study radiation of electrons accelerated at such boundary layers as an option for standard approaches involving internal shocks in jets. The acceleration process in the boundary layer yields in a natural way a two component electron distribution: a power-law continuum with a bump at the energy, where energy gains equal radiation losses, followed by a cut-off. For such distributions we derive the observed spectra of synchrotron and inverse-Compton radiation, including comptonization of synchrotron and CMB photons. Under simple assumptions of energy equipartition between the relativistic particles and the magnetic field, the relativistic jet velocity at large scales and a turbulent character of the shear layer, the considered radiation can substantially contribute to the jet radiative output. In the considered conditions the synchrotron emission is characterized by a spectral index of the radio-to-optical continuum being approximately constant along the jet. A characteristic feature of the obtained broad-band synchrotron spectrum is an excess at X-ray frequencies, similar to the one observed in some objects by Chandra. As compared to the uniform jet models, the velocity shear across the radiating boundary region leads to decrease and frequency dependence of the observed jet-counterjet radio brightness asymmetry. We conclude that a careful investigation of the observational data looking for the derived effects can allow to evaluate the role of the boundary layer acceleration processes and/or impose constraints for the physical parameters of such layers in large scale jets.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Radiation from the Relativistic Jet: a Role of the Shear Boundary Layer L. Stawarz and M. Ostrowski Obserwatorium Astronomiczne, Uniwersytet Jagiello´nski, ul. Orla 171, 30-244 Krak´ow, Poland [email protected] ABSTRACT Recent radio and optical large scale jets' observations suggest a two- component jet morphology, consisting of a fast central spine surrounded with a boundary layer with a velocity shear. We study radiation of electrons accel- erated at such boundary layers as an option for standard approaches involving internal shocks in jets. The acceleration process in the boundary layer yields in a natural way a two component electron distribution: a power-law continuum with a bump at the energy, where energy gains equal radiation losses, followed by a cut-off. For such distributions we derive the observed spectra of synchrotron and inverse-Compton radiation, including comptonization of synchrotron and CMB photons. Under simple assumptions of energy equipartition between the relativis- tic particles and the magnetic field, the relativistic jet velocity at large scales and a turbulent character of the shear layer, the considered radiation can substan- tially contribute to the jet radiative output. In the considered conditions the synchrotron emission is characterized by a spectral index of the radio-to-optical continuum being approximately constant along the jet. A characteristic feature of the obtained broad-band synchrotron spectrum is an excess at X-ray frequen- cies, similar to the one observed in some objects by Chandra. As compared to the uniform jet models, the velocity shear across the radiating boundary region leads to decrease and frequency dependence of the observed jet-counterjet radio brightness asymmetry. We conclude that a careful investigation of the observa- tional data looking for the derived effects can allow to evaluate the role of the boundary layer acceleration processes and/or impose constraints for the physical parameters of such layers in large scale jets. Subject headings: acceleration of particles -- galaxies: jets -- radiation mechanisms: nonthermal -- 2 -- 1. Introduction Jet radial stratification was proposed in order to interpret some radio and optical ob- servations of extragalactic jets. The existence of the jet boundary layer with a velocity shear was first suggested by the observations of jets in FR I sources. Owen et al. (1989) concluded that the jet morphology in M87 is dominated by the boundary layer more than by the shock structure. The constancy of the radio-to-optical spectral index along the jet and the similar- ity of radio and optical maps with emissivity peaking near the jet's surface strongly suggested the acceleration of radiating electrons in situ at the boundary region. Later polarimetry of M87 jet (Perlman et al. 1999) confirmed its complex structure, which contains knots with a transverse magnetic field dominating optical emission, and a shear layer which is bright in the radio band with a strong polarization suggesting a highly ordered magnetic field parallel to the jet's axis. Jet-counterjet surface brightness asymmetries and magnetic field structures of the other FR I radio galaxies, 3C 31 and 3C 296 (Laing 1996 and Hardcastle et al. 1997, respectively), were interpreted in terms of a model in which the jets consisted of a relativistic spine surrounded by a cylindrical layer with a velocity shear. A study of optical counterparts of the radio jets in BL Lac objects PKS 2201+044, PKS 0521-365, and 3C371 (Scarpa et al. 1999) emphasized the problem of the reacceleration of electrons radiating within the opti- cal band in the equipartition magnetic field, as the observed constant synchrotron spectral index along the jet could not be explained by the first-order Fermi shock acceleration. A map of the radio spectral index of another well known blazar, Mkn 501, revealed a boundary region of its jet with an unexpectedly flat spectrum (Edwards et al. 2000). Once again, this suggested action of some reacceleration mechanism at the jet surface. Some FR II radio sources also reveal a spine - shear boundary layer jet morphology. For instance, radio observations of 3C353 (Swain et al. 1998) were interpreted in terms of a Doppler-hidden relativistic spine surrounded by the slower moving boundary layer. Polarimetry has shown no magnetic field component transverse to the jet axis in the boundary layer, in agreement with previous observations of radio linear polarization of quasars (e.g. Cawthorne et al. 1993). The magnetic field being parallel to the flow velocity is expected in the presence of a strong velocity shear (e.g., Kahn 1983). VLBI observations of another FR II object 1055+018 (Attridge et al. 1999) revealed a fragmentary but distinct boundary layer with the mean longitudinal magnetic field present where interaction with the surrounding matter takes place (i.e., where the jet bends). Optical and radio observations of the quasar 3C 273 were interpreted in terms of a two component jet model, in which a fast-moving proper jet was surrounded by the slow-moving radio cocoon (Bahcall et al. 1995). Smooth changes of the radio-to-optical spectral index along the jet and a lack of correlation between the optical flux and the spectral index (Jester et al. 2001), strongly suggest reacceleration of the radiating electrons taking place within the whole jet body. Jester et al. also emphasized -- 3 -- the discrepancy between the light-travel time along the jet in 3C 273 and the lifetime of electrons responsible for its synchrotron optical emission. This discrepancy could not be removed by relativistic beaming or the sub-equipartition magnetic field. A difference between FR I and FR II radio sources is ascribed to respective jet power and the importance of its interaction with the surrounding medium (Ghisellini et al. 1998). In general, FR I jets are thought to decelerate and spread out on the tens-of-kpc scale with their apparent magnetic field dominated by the component made perpendicular due to propagating shocks (e.g., Laing 1996; Laing et al. 1999). On the contrary, jets in FR II sources seem to remain relativistic and well collimated even if they are far away from the nucleus. At the same time, their apparent parallel magnetic field configuration results from the interaction with the ambient medium, thereby creating the shear layer with an approximately constant (limited) thickness and dominating the observed polarization (Cawthorne et al. 1993; Swain et al. 1998). The relativistic velocity on a large scale leading to apparent superluminal motions is also present in intermediate objects like M87 (Biretta et al. 1999). The broad band spectral properties of BL Lacs and FR I radio galaxies give us another argument in support of a jet stratification. By comparing the multiwavelength observations of these two classes of AGNs in a framework of a unification scheme, Chiaberge et al. (2000) found evidence for a significant boundary layer emission, dominating the radiative jet output in FR Is. It is because FR I nuclei are over-luminous as compared to the predictions of the unification scheme, and because the ratios of radio to optical luminosities in BL Lacs are inconsistent with the ones observed in FR I's. The inferred velocities of such boundary regions are significantly slower as compared to the velocities of the central spines, but still relativistic, in order to explain anizotropic emission observed from the FR Is' cores. One should note, that our knowledge of physical conditions at the relativistic jet bound- ary is still insufficient. Several types of viscosity for the relativistic jet with a shear layer which confines the beam due to viscous interaction with the ambient medium were inves- tigated by Baan (1980). Cosmic ray viscosity in a boundary layer with a velocity shear which influences the hydrodynamics of the jet and particle distribution along its surface was studied by Earl et al. (1988) and Jokipii et al. (1989). Analogous radiation viscosity was investigated by Arav and Begelman (1992). The issue of jet stability with respect to magnetohydrodynamic Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instabilities of a boundary layer in a vortex sheet approximation was studied by Ferrari et al. (1978, 1980, 1981); Hardee (1979, 1983) and Birkinshaw (1984), among others. The influence of the finite thickness shear layer was considered by Ferrari et al. (1982) and Birkinshaw (1991). More recently, Hanasz and Sol (1996, 1998) investigated the growth of KH instabilities in two component relativistic and nonrelativistic jets. Such instabilities at the interface of a fluid beam and an external medium -- 4 -- can influence the apparent jet morphology (Ferrari et al. 1978; Hardee 1979; Benford et al. 1980) and generate turbulent MHD waves which accelerate particles (Ferrari et al. 1979; Eilek 1982). Ferrari et al. (1979) demonstrated that a small amplitude Alfv´en turbulence developed by the KH instabilities in extended radio lobes can accelerate electrons to high energies via the wave-particle resonant interactions. Eilek (1982) showed that MHD tur- bulence generated by the surface instabilities and accelerating the electrons is restricted to a narrow turbulent edge of the jet. During the last few years, the numerical modeling of relativistic jets provided some additional information on the nature of such transition layers. 3D simulations revealed the presence of a shear layer with a high specific internal energy and highly turbulent, subsonic and thin cocoon surrounding a relativistic flow (Aloy et al. 1999). Simulations of radio emission from such jets (Aloy et al. 2000), show a radial structure in both intensity and polarization. One should note that the reason for the generation of the turbulent shear layer in those simulations was numerical viscosity, which only qualitatively mimics the real viscous processes. Till the present time no one performed a more thorough study of both acceleration processes acting at jet boundaries and the resulting observational effects. Our present paper is intended to study the possibility that the turbulent boundary layers of large scale jets can substantially contribute to the radiative jet output. The modifications of the standard models of jet radiation arise from particle acceleration acting continuously within the considered region and kinematic effects due to the velocity shear. In the present study, we neglect a possible separate and different energetic electron population present within the jet spine. We concentrate on the boundary layer radiation, in order to evaluate a role of the electron acceleration processes in this layer and to constrain hardly known physical parameters of this region. Below, in Section 2 we discuss an acceleration mechanism creating at the jet boundary a power-law particle distribution with a much harder component at its high energy end. The radiation of such electrons through the synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton and external Compton processes, modified by the kinematic effects connected with the jet velocity shear, are derived in Section 3. Consequences of the considered acceleration mechanism in the context of multiwavelength large scale jets observations are discussed in Section 4. Finally, a few conclusions are presented in the last Section 5. 2. Acceleration of cosmic ray electrons Particle acceleration in a velocity shear layer was proposed in the early eighties by Berezhko with collaborators and then gradually developed (c.f. a review by Berezhko 1990). The action of such a mechanism at relativistic shear layers occurring at side boundaries -- 5 -- of relativistic jets was discussed by Ostrowski (1990, 1998, 2000). The mechanism was considered to provide high energy cosmic rays and to be an important factor influencing the dynamics of relativistic jets in extragalactic radio sources, thereby forming cosmic rays cocoons. Ostrowski and Sikora (2001) proposed that such an acceleration mechanism could provide a cosmic ray proton population being a substantial pressure factor in FR II radio source lobes. Below we discuss the application of the model of Ostrowski (2000) to the electron acceleration in the large scale jets. 2.1. Maximum electron energy Let us assume that a thickness of the transition layer between the considered tens- of-kiloparsecs scale jet and the surrounding medium, D, is comparable to the jet radius Rj ≈ 1 kpc (c.f. Owen et al. 1989; Swain et al. 1998, see also Aloy et al. 1999), and that the magnetic field B frozen into tenuous plasma at and outside the boundary, is parallel on average to the flow velocity, U. The scattering on the magnetic field irregularities in a turbulent medium with a perpendicular (≡ radial) mean velocity gradient results in the acceleration of energetic particles injected into the boundary layer. In our simple approach the efficiency of the acceleration process in the turbulent shear layer depends on the velocity structure of the layer and the particle mean free path λ. In the considered case of the mean magnetic field aligned along the jet in a highly turbulent boundary layer, a particle gyroradius, rg, can be taken for λ, and a relatively inefficient cross- field radial diffusion provides a particle escape mechanism from the acceleration region. For extremely high energy particles with rg > D, the jet boundary can be approximated as a surface of a discontinuous velocity change. Such a particle moving near the jet boundary interacts with the magnetic field perturbations and ocassionally crosses the discontinuity thereby increasing its energy on average. Numerical simulations for 'typical' jet parameters (Ostrowski 1998) reveal that protons can reach energies above 1019 eV in this mechanism. For particles with lower energies, rg < D, the acceleration within a finite thickness shear layer has to be considered. In this case, we deal with two different acceleration processes, the well- known second order Fermi acceleration in the turbulent medium and the acceleration due to cosmic ray viscosity in a velocity shear at the boundary. The cosmic ray viscosity in the context of particle acceleration was discussed by Berezhko in the early eighties (see Berezhko 1990 and references therein) and then by Earl et al. (1988) and Jokipii et al. (1989) in the case of nonrelativistic flows, and by Ostrowski (2000) for relativistic flow velocities. Below, we consider these mechanisms to provide relativistic electrons radiating through synchrotron and inverse Compton processes. Because of rapid energy radiation losses at high energies, -- 6 -- the electrons are always expected to satisfy the required condition rg ≪ D. Then, the acceleration time scale in a highly turbulent shear layer can be estimated (Ostrowski 2000) as Tacc ∼ (cid:16) rg c (cid:17) c2 D(cid:1)2 V 2 +(cid:0) rg , U 2 (2.1) where V is a characteristic velocity of the magnetic turbulence, U is the jet velocity and we put rg for λ. The first term in the denominator represents the ordinary Fermi mechanism and the second one represents the viscous acceleration. The Fermi process dominates when the particle energy is small enough to satisfy rg < D(V /U). We consider the jet velocity to be comparable to that of the light velocity, c, even on large scales. The velocity V is comparable to the Alfv´en velocity, VA, for a subsonic turbulence and possibly a few orders of magnitude smaller than U. MHD turbulent modes in a shear layer can be dominated by Alfv´en waves, because the other types of waves are damped much more rapidly. In order to estimate the Alfv´en velocity, VA = B / √4πρ, we assume that the mass density ρ of the jet and its extended lobes is dominated by nonrelativistic protons, ρ = mpn (Sikora and Madejski 2000). With the anticipated parameters for the boundary layer of the tens-of-kpc scale jet -- B ≈ 10−5 G and the proton number density n ≈ 10−4 cm−3 (c.f. Ferrari et al. 1979) -- one gets VA ≈ 2 · 108 cm/s. Then, with the condition rg < D(V /U) satisfied and V = VA, the characteristic acceleration time scale (2.1) for electrons ('e') reads as Tacc,e ∼ rg c (cid:16) c V (cid:17)2 = 5 · 103 γ B−1 µG V −2 8 [s], (2.2) where γ is the electron Lorentz factor, V8 ≡ VA/108 cm s−1 and BµG is the magnetic field in micro-Gauss units. Instead of n, we will use VA to parametrize the acceleration process, because the mass density is not an observed quantity. One should note, that the equation (2.2) introduces an optimistic scenario for the acceleration process involving the large am- plitude MHD turbulence at the scale of rg, leading to short scattering free path λ ∼ rg. The time scale for particle escape from the acceleration region due to cross-field diffusion can be evaluated as : Tesc ∼ D2 κ⊥ = 6 · 1023 γ −1 η−1 BµG D2 kpc [s], (2.3) where κ⊥ is the cross-field diffusion coefficient, κ⊥ = η rg c/3, with η ≤ 1 being a numerical scaling factor, and D is the acceleration region (boundary layer) thickness (Dkpc ≡ D/1 kpc). Particle escape determines the electron energy spectrum, when the electrons satisfy the condition Tacc,e ≈ Tesc , i.e., when rg ≈ (3/η)1/2D(V /c). For the considered boundary layer parameters and a strong turbulence condition η ≈ 1, radiative cooling becomes important at much lower electron energies. We consider radiative losses due to the synchrotron and -- 7 -- the inverse-Compton radiation (in the Thomson regime), to yield the loss time scale Tloss ∼ 6πmc σT γB2(1 + X) = 8 · 1020 γ −1 B−2 µG (1 + X)−1 [s], (2.4) where X is a ratio of the photon field energy density to the magnetic field energy density. Therefore, the maximum electron energy in the acceleration process can be estimated by comparing the time scale (2.2) with the scale for radiative losses, (2.4). For a value of X ≤ 1, possibly valid at the considered large distance from the active galactic nucleus (see next section), the maximum electron energy given by the condition Tacc,e = Tloss is γeq ≈ 4 · 108 V8 B−1/2 µG . (2.5) In our model, a rapid radiative cooling of electrons with such high maximum energy is compensated by acceleration taking place along the jet within the whole boundary layer volume. For lower turbulence amplitude, the acceleration process can proceed slower to yield kpcB3 a lower value for γeq. One may note, that at γ = γeq the ratio Tesc/Tacc ≈ 7 · 102D2 µG (≈ 7 · 105 for the considered jet parameters). 2.2. Electron energy distribution A simple time dependent model of Ostrowski (2000) uses a regular acceleration term to represent continues second-order Fermi acceleration plus the not-considered here oblique shocks possibly formed at the jet side boundary. After switching on the injection of seed electrons with the low initial Lorentz factor γ0, a spectral evolution of the distribution function ne(γ, t) for particles accelerated in the shear layer begins as a power-law with a growing energy cut-off. Then, either it forms a stable high energy cut-off when particle escape becomes substantial at some γ < γeq, or it evolves into a characteristic shape consisting of two different components: a power-law part at low energies, ne(γ) ∝ γ −σ, finished with a hard component modeled here as a nearly monoenergetic peak at γ = γeq due to the accelerated particles' pile-up caused by losses (Fig. 1). Normalization of the electron energy distribution depends on an unknown electron injection rate and is a free parameter of the model. In principle, the particle high energy component can grow to large values, limited only by the inefficient side way particle diffusion. However, when the energetic particle pressure becomes comparable to the ambient medium pressure, it can modify the transition layer structure. Then, some non-diffusive cosmic ray transport (turbulent diffusion, convective motions) or other non-linearities of the process can stabilize the average spectral distribution at the boundary on long time scales, or result in its locally intermittent character. Below, because of the very nature of the acceleration process, we consider the stationary avarage electron -- 8 -- spectrum formed within the boundary layer consisting of two basic components: a flat power- law component at lower energies and a high energy bump. Using the Haeviside function, Θ, and the Dirac delta function, δ, at energies above the injection energy, γ > γ0, the considered electron distribution (cf. Fig. 1) can be expressed by an analytic formula ne(γ) = a γ −σ Θ(γeq − γ) + b δ(γ − γeq), (2.6) where a and b are normalization parameters, and we put σ = 2. In the following discussion, we use numerical values for a and b providing equipartition between the magnetic field energy density uB ≡ B2/8 π and the energy densities of both electron spectral components: Z ∞ γ0 (γ mc2) a γ −2 Θ(γeq − γ) dγ = Z ∞ γ0 (γ mc2) b δ(γ − γeq) dγ = 1 2 uB, (2.7) where γeq > γ0. With assumed B = 10−5 G and maximum electron energy much higher than the injection energy, γeq ∼ 108 ≫ γ0 ∼ 10 − 100, the equipartitional normalization of the power-law electron distribution and the number density of the monoenergetic peak electrons are a ≈ 10−7 cm−3 and b ≈ 10−14 cm−3, respectively. Let us mention, that an analogous model was discussed by Schlickeiser (1984), who con- sidered similar pile-up mechanism for the relativistic electron distribution and studied evo- lution of the formed monoenergetic electron peak by solving stationary and time-dependent diffusion equation in the momentum space. In his model, the first-order shock acceleration accompanied by the second-order turbulent Fermi acceleration creates the pile-up growing bump at the energy, where the radiative losses balance the energy gains. Schlickeiser assumed the mean free path of the electron being independent on its energy, contrary to the consid- ered by us λ ∝ γ. It was shown, that the stationary two-component electron spectrum (the power-law plus the monoenergetic peak) forms in a presence of efficient shock acceleration, when the escape time scale is much longer than the Fermi acceleration scale. After switching off the shock acceleration, at the late phase of the evolution the high energy electron peak evolves into the ultrarelativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with the absolute height of the bump decreasing as exp(−t/Tesc). Below, we assume that the (quasi -- ) stationary averaged spectrum of electrons formed at the jet boundary layer can be represented by the distribution (2.6). As long as the diffusive particle escape to the sides is inefficient, the discussed acceleration process will create a high energy particle pile-up in a natural way (cf. Stawarz and Ostrowski 2001). The distributions produced within the jet boundary layer can vary in time and space reflecting the changes of the local conditions due to the jet interaction with the surrounding medium and action of non-linear effects in the acceleration process. However, the form of the averaged observed electron spectrum must consist of the two aforementioned components: the more or less exact -- 9 -- power-law and the broadened by the fluctuating background high energy bump preceding the distribution cut-off. Without a detailed acceleration model available, depending also on the unknown velocity structure of the boundary layer, we use the simple form (2.6) to discuss the role of these two spectral components for a particular example of comparable energies stored in both components. 3. Radiation of shear layer electrons We consider two radiation processes taking place at the relativistic jet boundary -- the synchrotron (SYN) emission of ultrarelativistic electrons with the energy spectrum (2.6), and their inverse Compton (IC) cooling. In the case of magnetic bremsstrahlung, we assume randomly orientated magnetic fields within the turbulent medium of the transition layer. A synchrotron self-absorption is neglected (i.e., the assumed optical depth for this process τsyn ≡ µsynl ≪ 1, where µsyn is a synchrotrotron self-absorption coefficient and l is an emitting region size). Therefore, in our calculations we limit the considered frequencies somewhat arbitrarily to the 'safe' range ν ≥ νabs = 1010 Hz, where self-absorption effects are unlikely to occur in the considered large scale jets. Additionally, the present analytic IC scattering calculations are limited to the Thomson regime, assuming a step scattering cross section σ = σT for γ ǫi < 1 and 0 otherwise, where ǫi is the seed photon energy expressed in units of the electron rest energy, mc2. A high energy spectral cut-off due to absorption of gamma rays via photon-photon pair creation on Cosmic Infrared Background (CIB) photons is expected to occur for distant sources (e.g., Renault et al. 2001). As we do not consider such processes, the obtained spectral distributions above TeV energies are the ones derived for close vicinity of the radiating jets and cannot be directly compared to observations. Considering the source of the target photons in a tens-of-kpc (or larger) scale jets, we neglect a possibility of comptonization of the galactic narrow line radiation and IR dust emission (Celotti et al. 2001), and we study the synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) radiation and the Compton scattering of external CMB photons (EC). With the assumed B = 10−5 G, the magnetic field energy density at the jet boundary is uB = B2/8π ≈ 4 · 10−12 erg/cm3. The energy density of the CMB radiation in a source frame moving with a bulk Lorentz factor cmbΓ2 ≈ 4 · 10−13 Γ2 erg/cm3, Γ (neglecting the cosmological redshift correction) is ucmb = u∗ In the jet rest frame, where an asterisk denotes quantities in the observer's rest frame. ucmb can be of the same order of magnitude as uB, and both processes can be significant even for moderate Γ. One should note that in such a case, the estimate (2.5) for γeq still holds. Celotti et al. (2001) considered also comptonization of the blazar ('bl') emission by electrons in the boundary region of the kpc-scale conical jet, with a low average boundary layer Lorentz factor Γ. The energy density of such radiation as seen in the boundary layer -- 10 -- bl Γ2 kpc Γ−2 erg/cm3, where L′ pc / 4πc z2 Γ2 ≈ 3 · 10−10 z−2 bl ∼ 1043erg/s local rest frame is ubl = L′ is the intrinsic synchrotron blazar luminosity, Γpc ∼ 10 is the bulk Lorentz factor of the parsec-scale jet, and z is a distance from the nucleus (zkpc ≡ z/kpc). The blazar emission dominates over the magnetic field energy density at distances zkpc < 10/Γ, and over the CMB field at the scales zkpc < 30/Γ2. Hence, for the studied large scale jets (z ≥ 10 kpc) and the relativistic flows (Γ ≥ 2) the blazar emission is neglected. In order to derive analytic formulae for emission we are forced to make a simplifying approximation of the isotropic distribution of the synchrotron radiation in the source local rest frame. In reality, the shear layer synchrotron radiation distribution is anizotropic due to kinematic effects of the nonuniform relativistic flow. A numerical modeling of such anizotropic radiation field will be presented in a forthcoming paper. 3.1. Synchrotron radiation The synchrotron emissivity of an isotropic ultrarelativistic electron distribution ne(γ) averaged over a randomly orientated magnetic field, B, is jsyn(ν) = √3e3B mc2 Z R(cid:18) ν c1γ 2(cid:19) ne(γ) 4π dγ, (3.1) where c1 = 3eB / 4πmc and R(x) is given by a combination of the modified second order Bessel functions (Crusius and Schlickeiser 1986) as R(x) = x2 2 K4/3(cid:16)x 2(cid:17) K1/3(cid:16)x 2(cid:17) − 0.3 x3 2 hK 2 4/3(cid:16) x 2(cid:17) − K 2 1/3(cid:16)x 2(cid:17)i . (3.2) Upon integrating the equation (3.1) for the electron distribution (2.6) and expanding the function R(xeq) for xeq ≡ ν/c1 γ 2 eq , one can obtain simple analytic expression for the synchrotron emissivity. For xeq ≫ 1, the function (3.2) decreases expo- nentially, R(xeq) ∝ exp(−xeq), and thus we neglect emission at frequencies ν ≫ c1γ 2 eq. For parameters a−7 ≡ a/(10−7 cm−3) and b−14 ≡ b/(10−14 cm−3), the synchrotron emissivity is (3.3) eq ≪ 1, R(xeq) ≈ 1.8 · x1/3 jsyn(ν) = (cid:2)f1 ν −1/2 + f2 ν 1/3(cid:3) Θ(νsyn,eq − ν), where f1 = 3 · 10−36 B3/2 µG a−7 eq B2/3 νsyn,eq = 1.3 BµG γ 2 eq f2 = 2 · 10−43 γ −2/3 µG b−14 [cgs], [cgs], [Hz]. -- 11 -- For illustration, let us compare the synchrotron radiation spectra of the particle distributions in the acceleration model of Ostrowski (2000) in successive times from the switching on of the acceleration process (Fig. 1). From the beginning of injection, the accelerated electrons form a power-law spectrum with an energy cut-off which grows with time. Then the resulting emission has (for σ = 2) a power-law form ∝ ν −1/2 with a growing cut-off frequency. When the maximum electron energy approaches γeq, a particle density peak starts to form and grow at γ ≈ γeq. Then, an additional radiation component ∝ ν 1/3 appears and eventually starts to dominate the spectrum at highest synchrotron frequencies, reaching the maximum at νsyn,eq (∼ 1017 Hz for γeq ≈ 108 and BµG ≈ 10). 3.2. Synchrotron Self-Compton radiation The inverse-Compton photon emissivity in the source frame, nic(ǫ, Ω), is given by nic(ǫ, Ω) = cZ dǫiI dΩiZ dγI dΩe (1 − β cos ψ) σ ni(ǫi, Ωi) ne(γ, Ωe), (3.4) where ǫ is the photon energy in the electron rest mass units, ǫ = hν/mc2, ni(ǫi, Ωi) is the seed photon number density (we put the indices i = syn, ic = ssc for SSC emission, and i = cmb, ic = ec for EC emission), ne(ǫe, Ωe) is the electron energy distribution, and ψ is an angle between the electron and the incident photon directions (e.g., Dermer 1995). All quantities are given in the source rest frame, which in our case, is a part of the boundary region - a cylindrical layer moving with a constant Lorentz factor Γ (see section 3.4). The rest-frame emissivity in cgs units can be found next as jic(ν, Ω) = h ǫ nic(ǫ, Ω). Computations of the SSC emission are performed in the Thomson regime with a scat- tering cross section independent of the seed photon energy, and with the scattered pho- tons beamed along the electron direction. The synchrotron radiation and the electron distribution are assumed to be isotropic in the source frame, ne(γ, Ωe) = ne(γ)/4π and nsyn(ǫsyn, Ωsyn) = nsyn(ǫsyn)/4π. Thus, the average energy of the comptonized synchrotron photon is ǫ = 4 obtain 3 γ 2ǫsyn, and in equation (3.4) one can put σ = σT δ(Ω − Ωe) δ(cid:0)ǫ − 4 3γ 2ǫsyn(cid:1) to nssc(ǫ, Ω) = cσT 4π Z dǫsynZ dγ nsyn(ǫsyn) ne(γ) δ(cid:18)ǫ − 4 3 γ 2ǫsyn(cid:19) . (3.5) For the electron energy distribution given by the equation (2.6) and the optically thin syn- chrotron intensity, Isyn(νsyn) ≡ jsyn(νsyn) l = ch 4π ǫsyn nsyn(ǫsyn) (where l is an emitting region linear size), putting ln (νmax/νabs) ∼ 10, where νmax = min(νsyn,eq , mc2/hγeq) = mc2/hγeq, and neglecting absorption due to photon-photon pair production, one can obtain the isotropic -- 12 -- SSC emissivity in the Thomson regime where f3 = 10−44 B3/2 jssc(ν) = (cid:2)f3 ν −1/2 + f4 ν 1/3(cid:3) Θ(νssc,eq − ν), −7 + 10−7 γeq a−7 b−14(cid:1) µG γ −4/3 µG lkpc(cid:0)3 a2 f4 = 5 · 10−58 B2/3 νmax γ 2 νssc,eq = [cgs], [Hz]. 4 3 lkpc b2 −14 eq eq = 1.6 · 1020 γeq (3.6) [cgs], Note, that the high energy electron bump contributes to both components of the SSC emis- sion (i.e., also to the one ∝ ν −1/2). 3.3. External Compton radiation Cosmic microwave background (CMB) intensity, Icmb(ν), has a blackbody form with a temperature T ∗ = 2.73 K. In a source frame moving with the relativistic Lorentz factor Γ, the CMB radiation is strongly anizotropic, providing an external radiation flux mainly from the direction opposite to the jet direction. Hence, for ultrarelativistic electrons, one can put (1−β cos ψ) = (1 + µe), where Ωe = (cos−1 µe, φe). Then, the scattered photon energy is ǫ = γ 2 ǫcmb (1 + µe). Therefore, in the Thomson regime σ = σT δ(Ω − Ωe) δ [ǫ − γ 2ǫcmb (1 + µe)], and for the isotropic electron distribution, the equation (3.4) reads as nec(ǫ, Ω) = cσT 4π (1 + µ)Z dǫcmbZ dγ ncmb(ǫcmb) ne(γ) δ(cid:2)ǫ − γ 2ǫcmb(1 + µ)(cid:3) . (3.7) Considering the power-law component of the electron energy distribution, it is convenient to model the CMB field as a monochromatic radiation with photon energies ǫcmb = Γ < ǫ∗ cmb >≡ cmb > mc2). For the monoenergetic 2.7·Γ k T ∗/mc2, and a number density ncmb = Γ u∗ electron peak component, one should use the exact blackbody spectrum transformed to the source frame. Hence, the emissivity of the comptonized CMB radiation, jec(ν, Ω), is cmb/(< ǫ∗ jec(ν, Ω) = (cid:20)f5(µ) ν −1/2 + f6(µ) ν 3 exp[f7(µ) ν] − 1(cid:21) Θ(νec,eq − ν), (3.8) where f5(µ) = 8 · 10−41 a−7 [Γ (1 + µ)]3/2 eq b−14 (1 + µ)−2 f6(µ) = 10−85 γ −6 f7(µ) = 3 · 10−11 Γ (1 + µ)−1 γ −2 eq [cgs], [cgs], [Hz−1], -- 13 -- νec,eq(µ) = 2 · 1011 Γ (1 + µ) γ 2 eq [Hz]. The high energy bump radiation with frequencies ν < f −1 7 (µ) (i.e., anizotropic Rayleigh- Jeans part of the blackbody CMB spectrum comptonized by the monoenergetic electrons) has a power-law form ∝ ν 2. 3.4. Kinematic effects Let us briefly discuss the main implications of the kinematic effects on the jet radiative output. First of all, the shear layer consists of sub-layers moving with different velocities and thus, generating different beaming patterns. In order to specify the jet velocity structure, we assume a uniform flow Lorentz factor Γj inside the jet spine, i.e. for 0 < r < Rj where r is a distance from the jet axis, and a radial profile Γ = Γ(r) within the cylindrical transition region Rj < r < Rc, where the flow velocity decreases and becomes zero (≡ the ambient medium velocity) at the radius Rc. Let us consider the simplest case of the linear dependence Γ(r) = 1 + (Γj − 1) Rc − r Rc − Rj . (3.9) for Rj ≤ r ≤ Rc. In each considered sub-layer, in the 'local source frame' the synchrotron, SSC and EC emissivities are approximately given by formulas (3.3), (3.6), and (3.8), respec- tively. Assuming that the radiating electrons are distributed uniformly (as seen in the local rest frames) inside the whole boundary region, one can find the observed emissivity of the sub-layer at the distance r from the jet axis as j ∗ i (ν ∗, θ∗, r) = δ2(r, θ∗) ji(cid:18)ν = ν ∗ δ(r, θ∗) , µ = µ∗ − β(r) 1 − β(r) µ∗(cid:19) , (3.10) where the index i = syn, ssc or ec, and δ(r, θ∗) is a Doppler factor for a sub-layer moving −1/2 at an angle θ∗ ≡ cos−1 µ∗ with respect to with the Lorentz factor Γ(r) = [1 − β 2(r)] the line of sight, δ(r, θ∗) = 1 / Γ(r) [1 − β(r) µ∗]. Next, the observed flux density from the boundary layer volume V ∗ can be found as S ∗(ν ∗, θ∗) = d−2R dV ∗ j ∗(ν ∗, θ∗, r), where d is the distance to the observer. Noting that Γ(r)[1 + µ] ≡ δ[1 + µ∗]/[1 + β(r)], and neglecting the slowly varying factor [1 + µ∗]/[1 + β(r)] (c.f. Dermer 1995) from the above equations one obtains the flow modified beaming patterns for the synchrotron, SSC, and EC radiation, as S ∗ syn(ν ∗, θ∗) ∝ (ν ∗)−αZ Rc Rj dr r δ2+α(r, θ∗), (3.11a) S ∗ ssc(ν ∗, θ∗) ∝ (ν ∗)−αZ Rc Rj dr r δ2+α(r, θ∗) / sin θ∗, (3.11b) -- 14 -- S ∗ ec(ν ∗, θ∗) ∝ (ν ∗)−αZ Rc Rj dr r δ3+2α(r, θ∗), (3.11c) where α is the spectral index of the respective power-law emission, and α = −2 for the Rayleigh-Jeans part of the comptonized CMB spectrum. In the case of SSC emissivity, we assumed isotropic distribution of the seed photons in the source rest frame, and we put the effective emitting region linear size scaling roughly like l ∝ D / sin θ∗. Integration in (3.11) can be performed numerically for the given values of Γj, Rj, Rc, θ∗, and for the assumed radial velocity profile. 3.5. Composite spectra Our model of high energy radiation generated within the jet boundary region has a few free parameters. They include normalization of the power-law electron distribution, a, a height of the monoenergetic electron peak, b, the magnetic field induction, B, the Alfv´en velocity in the shear layer, VA (or the mass density of the plasma within the boundary region, ρ), and the injection electron energy, γ0. In general, the electron power-law spectral index, σ, can also be treated as a free parameter represented in this paper by the model value σ = 2. Here, VA (or ρ) and B limit a value of the maximum electron energy, γeq. Relative normalizations of radiation spectral components -- synchrotron, SSC and EC emission -- depend on the above parameters and hence the observed composite boundary layer spectral energy distribution varies with the selected values of a, b, B, γeq, γ0 together with the geometrical factors Γj, Rj, Rc and θ∗. For a 'typical' tens-of-kpc scale jet the magnetic field and the Alfv´en speed are, say, B ≈ 10−5 G and VA ∼ 108 cm/s, and the maximum electron energy can be as high as γeq ∼ 108 (Eq. 2.5). We assume, that in the boundary region γ0 ≪ γeq and that the electrons are uniformly distributed within the whole radiating volume (as seen in the local layer rest frame). The magnetic field energy density can provide estimates for normalizations of both electron spectral components, if we require the equipartition: a ≈ 10−7 cm−3 and b ≈ 10−14 cm−3 (Eq. 2.7). The thickness of the large scale jet boundary layer and the jet radius are assumed to be of the order of a kiloparsec, D ≈ Rj ≈ 1 kpc, and hence Rc = 2 Rj. Below, for illustration, we consider a part of the jet with the observed length ∆z ≈ 1 kpc. We also assume, that the jet spine is highly relativistic even at large scales, with that the bulk Lorentz factor Γj ≈ 10 (c.f. Ghisellini and Celotti 2001). The jet with the described parameters is used to illustrate possible role of kinematic effects at the observed brightness distribution along the jet. The observed spectral energy distribution (SED) of the emission generated at the con- -- 15 -- sidered part of the boundary region, ν ∗S ∗(ν ∗, θ∗), is shown on figure 2 for four different viewing angles. We put the source distance from the observer d ≈ 104 kpc. In order to estimate the observed luminosity of the boundary layer emission, one has to integrate over the intrinsic luminosities of the sub-layers with volumes dV ∗ ≡ 2π ∆z r dr and the Doppler factors δ(r, θ∗). For example, the synchrotron luminosity of the boundary layer electrons is L∗ syn(θ∗) = Z δ3(r, θ∗) dLsyn ≡ ZZ δ3(r, θ∗) γloss mc2 ne(γ) dγ dV ∗, (3.12) where γloss = γ/Tloss denotes the synchrotron energy losses. In our illustrative example, synchrotron luminosity of the high energy bump electrons observed at θ∗ = 450 (i.e. the observed flux multiplied by the 4πd2) can be as high as 1042 erg/s. 4. Multiwavelength large scale jet boundary emission In this section we compare the model of a radiative boundary layer with the large scale jet observations. We do not consider the possible contribution from the separate population of relativistic electrons accelerated within the knots due to the first order shock acceleration. Our considerations are intended to describe only the main spectral characteristics of the relativistic electrons accelerated within the turbulent boundary region. 4.1. Radio-to-optical continuum For the anticipated large scale jet parameters, assuming equipartition between the mag- netic field and the relativistic electrons accelerated within the shear layer, one will find the power-law electron component dominating the radio-to-optical jet boundary emission, as il- lustrated on figure 2. As a result of a continuous acceleration taking place within the whole boundary layer, the radio-to-optical spectral index is constant along the jet. Of course, changes of the physical conditions with the distance from the nucleus (e.g., changes of the magnetic field, turbulent conditions, etc.) can result in smooth changes of the slope of the synchrotron continuum, like in the case of M 87 or 3C 273 (Meisenheimer et al. 1996; Jester et al. 2001, respectively). In our model the acceleration process creates the high energy electron spectral bump and the optical emission joins smoothly the X-ray bump emission. Such spectral character is different from the case usually considered in the literature of the power-law continuum ended by the cut-off at optical or X-ray frequencies, followed by the inverse-Compton component. The important manifestation of the boundary layer radio-to-optical emission is a de- -- 16 -- crease of the jet-counterjet brightness asymmetry as compared to the uniform jet, suggested previously by Komissarov (1990). This effect arise from the fact, that in a presence of the velocity shear, for a given viewing angle θ∗ > 1/Γj the observed synchrotron emissivity is maximized for Γ(r) = 1/ sin θ∗ (i.e., for the maximum value of the Doppler factor δ(r, θ∗)), while the uniform jet radiation, if present, is Doppler-hidden. Figure 3 illustrates the bound- ary layer jet-counterjet brightness asymmetry, S ∗ syn(θ∗) S ∗ syn(π − θ∗) Rj = R Rc R Rc Rj dr r δ2+α(r, θ∗) dr r δ2+α(r, π − θ∗) , (4.1) for the spectral index α = 0.5 corresponding to the radio emission of our power-law electron component and the Lorentz factor profile (3.9) with Rc = 2 Rj and Γj = 10 or 3. For comparison, respective flux asymmetries for the uniform jet models are also plotted. Due to the considered effect, for Γj = 10 and the moderate inclinations, the observed jet asymmetry can be reduced by more than one order of magnitude in comparison to the uniform jets. Hence, the middly-relativistic velocities inferred from the observed jet asymmetries of the tens-of-kpc scale jets can correspond to the slower boundary layer and not necessarily to the fast spine, which can still be highly relativistic at the observed distances. 4.2. X-ray bump emission In the model presented here, the X-ray radiation of large scale jets is dominated by the high energy electron bump spectral component. As illustrated on figure 2, the observed synchrotron X-ray flux can be above the extrapolated radio-to-optical continuum. The spectrum inclination at X-ray frequencies can be different from the power-law observed at lower frequencies, and the difference depends also on a viewing angle. Figure 4 illustrates this dependence for the effective X-ray spectral index αx,ef f (θ∗) computed between h ν ∗ 1 = 1 keV and h ν ∗ 2 = 5 keV as log [S ∗ X(ν ∗ X(ν ∗ 1 , θ∗) / S ∗ 2 / ν ∗ log [ν ∗ 1] 2, θ∗)] . (4.2) αX,ef f (θ∗) = X(ν ∗, θ∗) ∝ R r dr δ2(r, θ∗) R(x∗ eq), a function R(x∗ where S ∗ eq) is given by equation 3.2, and eq = ν ∗/c1γ 2 eqδ(r, θ∗). The difference between αX,ef f for different jet Lorentz factors and x∗ different viewing angles results from the spectral character of the high energy electron bump emission, which is strongly concentrated around the maximum synchrotron frequency νsyc,eq. Transformation to the observer's rest frame, which depends on the flow Lorentz factor and on the inclination θ∗, results in the fact, that for the fixed observed frequency ν ∗ in this spectral range (ν ∗ ∼ νsyn,eq )different parts of the X-ray continuum can contribute to the radiative -- 17 -- output. For the higher Doppler beaming factors (i.e., higher Γj or smaller θ∗) the effective X-ray spectral index of the bump electrons with γeq ∼ 108 approach the asymptotic value −1/3. In the particular case considered by us the counterjet has a steeper X-ray continuum, as compared to the jet spectrum. Moreover, for large viewing angles, X-ray emission of the jet softens significantly, opposite to the counterjet emission. Note, that such a behavior is opposite to what we expect in the case of IC models involving the low-energy tail of the electron distribution, in which the X-ray spectral index of the jet and the counterjet should be the same, and approximately constant with the distance from the nucleus and with the viewing angle. The boundary X-ray emission at the large scales can therefore vary among different types of the jets, reflecting different physical conditions at their edges and different kinematic effects involved. Thus, it is interesting to note that the large scale X-ray emission observed from several radio loud AGNs exhibit the different spectral characteristics. Chandra X-ray Observatory has detected significant emission from the large scale jets in quasars (e.g. PKS 0637-752: Chartas et al. 2000), FR II sources (e.g. Pictor A: Wilson et al. 2001), and FR I radio galaxies (e.g. M 87: Marshall et al. 2001b). In the majority of cases, thermal bramstrahlung can be excluded, and the non-thermal models seem to provide the only possible explanation for the X-ray emission (Harris 2001). However, the spectral index of the X-ray non-thermal continuum is different for different sources. Also the ratio of the X-ray flux to the optical flux changes significantly in the Chandra jets sample. This suggest, that different radiative processes can be at work. The models of the non-thermal large scale jet X-ray emission usually involve the synchrotron emission of high energy electrons, with Lorentz factor γ ∼ 107, or the inverse Compton scattering of CMB photons by much less energetic electrons (γ ∼ 102) in a relativistic jet. Both classes of models are subject to difficulties in explaining the variety of Chandra observations. The synchrotron emission from one population of the electrons accelerated in a relativistic shock is excluded if the X-ray flux is above the extrapolated radio-to-optical continuum. Also, the continuous along the jet character of the large scale X-ray emission is inconsistent with short lifetimes of the electrons radiating X-rays in the equipartition magnetic fields, unless we consider continuous acceleration within the whole jet body. On the other hand, the 'beamed' external Compton (EC(beam)) models require highly relativistic jet flows on the tens-of-kpc scales, and extrapolation of the single power-law electron energy distribution to low energies, while, in most of the cases, there is no direct evidence supporting these assumptions. As discussed in detail by Harris and Krawczynski (2001) such models can be excluded if the X-ray spectrum is much steeper than the one observed at radio frequencies. One should also note, that the long life-time of the electrons scattering CMB photons is in contrast with the knotty morphology of the X-ray jets, as well as with the off-sets between the radio and the X-ray peaks reported in several brightest knots. -- 18 -- The EC(beam) model with significant Doppler beaming seems to work well in the case of the quasar PKS 0637-752 (Tavecchio et al. 2000), where VLBI observations suggest the parsec-scale flow Lorentz factor Γj > 18 and the inclination angle θ∗ < 6.40. For other quasars the situation is more complicated. For instance, observations of the jet in 3C 273 (Marshall et al. 2001a; Sambruna et al. 2001) are insufficient to choose between the syn- chrotron or the EC origin of the X-ray knots' emission, and the existence of an additional electron population radiating in this range is not excluded. One should also note recently published HST observations (Jester et al. 2002) showing smooth transition from optical through UV to X-ray frequencies, as expected in our model. The X-ray luminosities of the known quasars' jets are in the range 1043 − 1045 erg/s, and their X-ray spectra are very flat, i.e. αX ∼ 0.23 for 3C 207, (Brunetti et al. 2001), ∼ 0.5 for PKS 1127, (Siemiginowska et al. 2002), or ∼ 0.8 for 3C 273 and PKS 0637. In our model, the observed luminosity of the X-ray emission generated at the boundary layer can reach the observed values for reasonable jet parameters (c.f. discussion in section 3.5), and the low effective spectral index is consistent with small jet inclinations (c.f. Fig. 4). The significant X-ray emission is also observed from the large scale jets in radio galaxies. The lower X-ray luminosities of such jets, lying in the range 1039 − 1042 erg/s, and their relatively steep X-ray spectra, αX ∼ 1.0 − 1.5 (Kraft et al. 2000 for Cen A, Hardcastle et al. 2001 for 3C 66B, Worrall et al. 2001 for B2 0206 and B2 0755), correspond to the large inclination angles on figure 4 and/or lower jet Lorentz factors. In most of jets in the radio galaxies, the EC(beam) models are excluded, as they require too high beaming factors, the magnetic fields much below the equipartition values and too steep low-energy electron spectra. On the other hand, the synchrotron radiation of the shock accelerated electrons cannot explain the strong diffusive emission extending few kpc from the nucleus in, e.g., Cen A and 3C 66B. We expect, that the detailed investigation of the knots emission can allow verification of our two-component electron spectrum model, if the knots form by the shock compression of the energetic electrons previously accelerated at the boundary layer upstream of the shock (c.f. Begelman and Kirk 1990). More directly, the boundary layer X-ray radiation should manifests at the inter-knot sections of the jet. Due to the acceleration taking place con- tinuously within the whole radiating volume, such an X-ray flux should be approximately constant (or change slowly) along the jet. Unfortunately, there are no observations in large scale jets of the counterjet X-ray spectra. In some cases, the lower limits for the X-ray brightness asymmetry can be estimated, like for the 3C 66B (> 25, Hardcastle et al. 2001), Pictor A (> 15, Wilson et al. 2001), or PKS 1127 (> 5, Siemiginowska et al. 2002). There is evidence of a non-zero X-ray flux from the counterjet in the last object. Note, that in a framework of radiative boundary layer model, the jet-counterjet X-ray brightness asymmetry is smaller than the one in EC models with strong beaming. -- 19 -- 4.3. Very high energy γ-ray emission Very high energy (VHE) γ-rays are directly observed only from a few nearby AGNs during their flaring state (c.f. a review by Kifune 2001). Very short time scales of the spectral variations at TeV photon energies suggest small sub-parsec sizes of the emitting regions, where the violent particle shock acceleration take place. In our model, the electrons accelerated within the boundary layer of the large scale jets are also able to produce such energetic radiation, mainly due to the IC scattering of the CMB photons, as illustrated on figure 2. One should note, that figure 2 corresponds to the most optimistic scenario, with the highly relativistic jet spine and very efficient acceleration creating the electrons with large Lorentz factors up to γeq ∼ 108. Smaller values of Γj and γeq would result in decreasing the observed VHE flux and shifting the spectral cut-off to the lower frequencies. Alternatively, for the lower jet velocities or smaller γeq at the few-of-kpc scales the blazar emission illuminating the jet from behind can provide seed photons to produce TeV radiation. Yet another possibility considered in the literature is producing the VHE γ-rays by the relativistic protons accelerated in the large scale relativistic jets (Aharonian 2002). VHE γ-rays generated at the distant jets lose their energies due to absorption on the CIB radiation, CMB photons, and other photon fields surrounding the source. Aharonian et al. (1994) suggested, that the electromagnetic cascades initiated by such an absorption create the extended pair halo around the 10-100 TeV extragalactic sources. VHE radiation generated at the jet boundary layer should naturally contribute to this process. 4.4. Discussion of the free parameters of the model In order to illustrate the main physical features of the considered model we selected its parameters in a way to exhibit clearly its main characteristics. In particular we neglect possible radiation components from the jet spine and the ambient medium next to the boundary layer, as well as from the shocks possibly formed in the flow. In real jets the respective components add to the observed object radiation. For the considered radiating electrons we assume energy equipartition with the background magnetic field and the equal division of energy between the power-law and the final bump components. One should note that application of this simple two-component distribution allows for analytic study of the formed spectrum, it enables a clear separation of signatures of these both components in it, but to model the observations a more elaborated distributions can be required. Such distributions will involve an initial power-law segment in the spectrum, which flattens at larger energies and forms a final (not sharp) bump before the exponential cut-off (work in preparation; cf. Petrosian and Donaghy 1999). We also take a particular set of background -- 20 -- conditions for the jet and its boundary layer (the magnetic field and the matter content, the turbulence and the large scale kinematic structure) and the ambient radiation fields for this model. Let us consider how the main predictions of the presented model depend on certain values of the free parameters assumed in the text, and in particular if the maximum energy of the boundary layer electrons can substantially differ among different jet models. For the efficient particle acceleration within the shear boundary layer we assume its tur- bulent character with high amplitudes MHD or plasma waves scattering energetic electrons. The assumed configuration of the mean magnetic field within the shear region with dominat- ing components parallel to the jet axis was already discussed and seems to be confirmed by the observations. For these conditions the acceleration process acts as described in Section 2, with the time scales for particle escape and radiative losses (Eq-s 2.3 and 2.4) satisfying the inequality Tesc > Tloss, equivalent to Dkpc > 0.04 B−3/2 µG . One may note that for a range of magnetic fields in large scale jets, 10 < BµG < 103, the above condition can be easily satisfied for the transition layer thickness Dkpc ∼ 1 cited in the literature. −4 −4 and Lj,47 ∼ 1.3 R2 j,kpc Γ2 j c Γ2 The estimate of the maximum electron energy in Eq. 2.5 gives γeq ∼ 8.7 · 107 B1/2 µG n−1/2 . The parameters in this expression, the magnetic field and the jet particle density, cannot be varied arbitrary as they also determine the jet energetics. With the anticipated model of the relativistic jet dynamically dominated by cold protons, the jet (spine) kinetic power is j mp c2 n and the comoving magnetic field energy density should be given by Lj ∼ π R2 less than cold protons energy density, uB < mp c2 n. Let us rewrite the above expressions as BµG < 2 · 103 n1/2 j n−4, where Lj,47 = Lj/1047 erg/s. Estimates often give for powerful jets Lj,47 ∼ 1 (Sikora 2001). Hence, the number density n−4 ∼ 0.01 − 1 is estimated for the cases of, respectively, highly relativistic and nonrelativistic large scale jets with Rj,kpc ∼ 1 and the maximum magnetic field should be in the range 10−4 − 10−3 G. In Section 2 we adopted the high value of the relativistic jet density, n−4 ∼ 1, as the scale of 1047 erg/s should be regarded as the lower limit for the total kinetic energy of the powerful jets (cf. discussion in Sikora 2001). Observations of knots in the large scale jets indicate that their magnetic fields amplified by the shock compression are ∼ 10−5 − 10−4 G. The magnetic field within the boundary layer, possibly amplified by the velocity shear, is likely to be not greater than these values. On the other hand, it is not expected to be smaller than the magnetic field ∼ 10−6− 10−5 G inside radio lobes. Therefore, we conclude that the most likely value of the magnetic induction within the boundary layer is close to the assumed above BµG ∼ 10. However, even if one will adopt the less optimistic scenario of a heavy jet (n−4 ∼ 1) with the weak boundary layer magnetic field (BµG ∼ 1) the maximum electron energy is still large, γeq ∼ 108, and the maximum synchrotron frequency νsyn,eq ∼ BµG γ 2 eq > 1016 Hz. For more realistic parameters the synchrotron emission peaks at high X-ray frequencies. -- 21 -- As a result of weak dependence of γeq on the boundary layer parameters the expected slowly varying along the jet radio-to-optical spectral index, the discussed decrease of the jet- counterjet radio brightness asymmetry and distributed along the jet synchrotron emission peaking at X-ray frequencies, are expected to hold quite generally. Presence of the flat high energy electron component (pile-up bump) also seems to appear in a natural way, without a particular tuning of the jet parameters. The main uncertainties of the presented results are connected with the hardly known velocity profiles of the large scale jets. The bulk Lorentz factor of the flow, Γ, determines the relative importance of the external photon fields cooling electrons via inverse-Compton scattering. As discussed in Section 3, the energy density of the AGN core emission exceeds the magnetic field energy density at distances zkpc < 10/Γ from the galactic center, while the CMB energy density is higher than uB for BµG < 3 Γ in our local universe. For the considered values of 1 < Γ < 10 at the tens-of-kpc jet scales, we expect negligible contribution to the radiative output from comptonization of the AGN core emission, and a rough equipartition between the magnetic field and the CMB radiation. It results in approximately equal fluxes of the synchrotron and the IC boundary layer radiation, if one neglects possible propagation effects to the observer. The form of the Γ(r) radial profile and the related spatial variation of acceleration efficiency can significantly influence the beaming pattern and intensity of the boundary layer emission. Therefore the large scale jet spectra at γ-ray frequencies, in particular relative normalization of the SSC and EC components presented at figure 2, illustrate their qualitative features only. The isotropic distribution of the seed photons assumed in deriving the SSC emission may result in its overestimate. However, even though comptonization of the CMB photons exceeds the self-Compton emission (for anticipated uB ∼ ucmb ∼ ue), and therefore more detailed treatment of the SSC radiation, involving anizotropic nature of its seed photons, does not result in changing of the observed composite high energy spectra. Finally, let us shortly comment on the jet-counterjet X-ray spectral index asymmetry and its angular dependence, αX,ef f (θ∗) (Eq. 4.2). Although the hard electron component is always expected to dominate the boundary layer X-ray emission, the observed spectral index at critical frequencies can substantially vary for different jet viewing angles, the jet bulk Lorentz factors and the exact shape of the electron spectrum at highest energies. Therefore, figure 4 illustrates only a possible behavior of the X-ray jets demonstrating different spectral indices of the jet and the counterjet. -- 22 -- 5. Conclusions In the present paper, we study radiation of the ultrarelativistic electrons accelerated at boundary shear layers of large scale relativistic jets. The acceleration process acting at such layer is substantially different from the often considered first order shock acceleration. It can generate, in a natural way, a characteristic two component particle spectrum with a low energy power-law distribution extending in energy up to the harder pile-up component forming at higher energies due to radiation losses. In order to study a possible role of the mentioned process we constructed a simple, in its several aspects qualitative model of particle acceleration and radiation from the jet boundary. We propose, that the emission of such electrons can substantially contribute to the jet radiative output and we investigate the resulting observational effects. Modifications of the standard jet model arise from the kinematic effects involved (c.f. Komissarov 1990; Laing et al. 1999; Chiaberge et al. 2000; Celotti et al. 2001) and the mentioned nature of the acceleration process (Ostrowski 2000): • With the considered above continuous in situ acceleration model, the radio-to-optical range of the boundary layer emission is characterized by weak variation of the spectral index along the jet, assuming the boundary layer physical parameters change smoothly with the distance from the nucleus. The considered radial velocity profile of the rel- ativistic jet defines the beaming pattern of the boundary layer emission. In general, the velocity shear within the boundary region results in decreasing the observed jet- counterjet brightness asymmetry, affecting evaluations of the jet bulk Lorentz factors. • If the considered cosmic ray population involves the high energy bump electrons with the energy density comparable to the magnetic field energy density, one should observe a high frequency (X-ray) excess over the power-law radiation extrapolated from the lower frequency measurements. In a framework of our model, the spectral properties of the X-ray bump emission (the effective spectral index, jet-counterjet brightness asymmetry, etc) can substantially differ from the one observed at lower frequencies. We speculate, that such features can be seen at least in some Chandra jets. • The considered model can explain the observed in some cases edge-brightened jets in a natural way. One should note, that our conclusions depend weakly on the unknown detailed physical con- ditions within the transition layer. The model presented here, far from being complete, is intended to describe the main radiative properties of the boundary region under simple as- sumptions about turbulent character of the shear layer, relativistic jet velocities on the large scales and energy equipartition between the magnetic field and the accelerated electrons. We -- 23 -- expect, that careful analysis of observational data should reveal the effects discussed above and thus provide restrictions both on physical parameters within such boundary layers and the proposed model of electron acceleration. We are grateful to Marek Sikora for his help and discussions. MO acknowledges a useful discussions with Vah´e Petrosian. Remarks of the anonymous referee enabled to substantially improve the final version of the paper. The present work was supported by Komitet Bada´n Naukowych through the grant BP 258/P03/99/17. REFERENCES Aharonian, F.A., Coppi, P.S., Volk, H.J. 1994, ApJ, 423, L5 Aharonian, F.A. 2002, MNRAS, in press Aloy, M.A., Ibanez, J.M., Marti, J.M., Gomez, and J.L., Muller, E. 1999, ApJ, 523, L125 Aloy, M.A., Gomez, J.L., Ibanez, J.M., Marti, J.M., and Muller, E. 2000, ApJ, 528, L85 Arav, N., and Begelman, M.C. 1992, ApJ, 401, 125 Attridge, J.M., Roberts, D.H., and Wardle, J.F.C. 1999, ApJ, 518, L87 Baan, W.A. 1980, ApJ, 239, 433 Bahcall, J.N., Kirhakos, S., Schneider, D.P., Davis, R.J., Muxlow, T.W.B., Garrington, S.T., Conway, R.G., and Unwin, S.C. 1995, ApJ, 452, L91 Begelman, M.C., and Kirk, J.G. 1990, ApJ, 353, 66 Benford, G., Ferrari, A., and Trussoni, E. 1980, ApJ, 241, 98 Berezhko, E.G. 1990, Preprint Frictional Acceleration of Cosmic Rays, The Yakut Scientific Centre, Yakutsk Biretta, J.A., Sparks, W.B., and Macchetto, F. 1999, ApJ, 520, 621 Birkinshaw, M. 1984, MNRAS, 208, 887 Birkinshaw, M. 1991, MNRAS, 252, 505 Brunetti, G., Bondi, M., Comastri, A., Setti, G. 2001, A&A, 381, 795 -- 24 -- Cawthorne, T.V., Wardle, J.F.C., Roberts, D.H., and Gabuzda, D.C. 1993, ApJ, 416, 519 Celotti, A., Ghisellini, G., and Chiaberge, M. 2001, MNRAS, 321, L1 Chartas, G., Worrall, D.M., Birkinshaw, M., Creistello-Dittmar, M., Cui, W., Ghosh, K.K., Harris, D.E., Hooper, D.J., Jauncey, D.L., Kim, D.W., Lovell, J., Marshall., H.L., Mathur, S., Schwartz, D.A., Tingay, S.J., Virani, S.N., and Wilkes, B.J. 2000, ApJ, 542, 655 Chiaberge, M., Celotti, A., Capetti, A., and Ghisellini, G. 2000, A&A, 358, 104 Crusius, A., and Schlickeiser, R. 1986, A&A, 164, L16 Dermer, C.D. 1995, ApJ, 446, L63 Earl, J.A., Jokipii, J.R., and Morfill, G. 1988, ApJ, 331, L91 Edwards, P.G., Giovannini, G., Cotton, W.D., Feretti, L., Fujisawa, K., Hirabayashi, H., Lara, L., and Venturi, T. 2000, PASJ, 52, 1015 Eilek, J.A. 1982, ApJ, 254, 472 Ferrari, A., Trussoni, E., and Zaninetti, L. 1978, A&A, 64, 43 Ferrari, A., Trussoni, E., and Zaninetti, L. 1979, A&A, 79, 190 Ferrari, A., Trussoni, E., and Zaninetti, L. 1980, MNRAS, 193, 469 Ferrari, A., Trussoni, E., and Zaninetti, L. 1981, MNRAS, 196, 1051 Ferrari, A., Trussoni, E., and Zaninetti, L. 1982, MNRAS, 198, 1065 Ghisellini, G., Celotti, A., Fossati, G., Maraschi, L., and Comastri, A. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 451 Ghisellini, G., Celotti, A. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 739 Hanasz, M., and Sol, H. 1996, A&A, 315, 355 Hanasz, M., and Sol, H. 1998, A&A, 339, 629 Hardcastle, M.J., Alexander, P., Pooley, G.G., and Riley, J.M. 1997, MNRAS, 288, L1 Hardcastle, M.J., Birkinshaw, M., and Worrall, D.M. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1499 Hardee, P.E. 1979, ApJ, 234, 47 -- 25 -- Hardee, P.E. 1983, ApJ, 269, 94 Harris, D.E. 2001, in Proc. Oxford Workshop 'Particles and Fields in Radio Galaxies', eds. R.A. Laing & K.M. Blundell, Oxford. Harris, D.E., and Krawczynski, H. 2001, ApJ, 565, 244 Jester, S., Roser, H.J., Meisenheimer, K., Perley, R., and Conway, R. 2001, A&A, 373, 447 Jester, S., Roser, H.-J., Meisenheimer, K., Perley, R. A&A, accepted Jokipii, J.R., Kota, J., and Morfill, G. 1989, ApJ, 345, L67 Kahn, F.D. 1983, MNRAS, 202, 553 Kifune, T. 2001, PASA, 19, in press Komissarov, S.S. 1990, SvAL, 16, 284 Kraft, R.P., Forman, W., Jones, C., Kenter, A.T., Murray, S.S., Aldcroft, T.L., Elvis, M.S., Evans, I.N., Fabbiano, G., Isobe, T., Jerius, D., Karovska, M., Kim, D.-W., Prestwich, A.H., Primini, F.A., Schwartz, D.A. 2000, ApJ, 531, L9 Laing, R.A. 1996, in 'Energy Transport in Radio Galaxies and Quasars', ASP Conference Series vol. 100, eds. P.E. Hardee, A.H. Bridle & J.A. Zensus, San Francisco Laing, R.A., Parma, P., de Ruiter, H.R., and Fanti, R. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 513 Marshall, H.L., Harris, D.E., Grimes, J.P., Drake, J.J., Fruscione, A., Juda, M., Kraft, R.P., Mathur, S., Murray, S.S., Ogle, P.M., Pease, D.O., Schwartz, D.A., Siemiginowska, A.L., Vrtilek, S.D., and Wargelin, B.J. 2001a, ApJ, 549, L167 Marshall, H.L., Miller, B.P., Davis, D.S., Perlman, E.S., Wise, M., Canizares, C.R., and Harris, D.E. 2001b, ApJ, 564, 683 Meisenheimer, K., Roser, H.J., Schlotelburg, M., 1996, A&A, 307, 61 Ostrowski, M. 1990, A&A, 238, 435 Ostrowski, M. 1998, A&A, 335, 134 Ostrowski, M. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 579 Ostrowski, M., and Sikora, M. 2001, in Proc. 20th Texas Symp. on Relativistic Astrophysics, eds. J.C. Wheeler & H. Martel (Austin), AIP Conf. Ser. 586, 865 -- 26 -- Owen, F.N., Hardee, P.E., and Cornwell, T.J. 1989, ApJ, 340, 698 Perlman, E.S., Biretta, J.A., Fang, Z., Sparks, W.B., and Macchetto, F.D. 1999, AJ, 117, 2185 Petrosian, V., and Donaghy, T.Q. 1999, ApJ, 527, 945 Renault, C., Barrau, A., Lagache, G., and Puget, J.-L. 2001, A&A, 371, 771 Sambruna, R.M., Urry, C.M., Tavecchio, F., Maraschi, L., Scarpa, R., Chartas, G., and Muxlow, T. 2001, ApJ, 549, L161 Scarpa, R., Urry, C.M., Falomo, R., and Treves, A. 1999, ApJ, 526, 643 Schlickeiser, R. 1984, A&A, 136, 227 Siemiginowska, A., Bechtold, J., Aldcroft, T.L., Elvis, M., Harris, D.A., Dobrzycki, A. 2002, ApJ, accepted Sikora, M., and Madejski, G. 2000, ApJ, 534, 109 Sikora, M. 2001, in 'Blazar Demographics and Physics', eds. P. Padovani & C.M. Urry (San Francisco), ASP Conf. Ser. 227, 95 Stawarz, L., and Ostrowski, M. 2001, PASA, 19, in press Swain, M.R., Bridle, A.H., and Baum, S.A. 1998, ApJ, 507, L29 Tavecchio, F., Maraschi, L., Sambruna, R.M., and Urry, C.M. 2000, ApJ, 544, L23 Wilson, A.S., Young, A.J., Shopbell, P.L. 2001, ApJ, 547, 740 Worrall, D.M., Birkinshaw, M., and Hardcastle, M.J. 2001, MNRAS, 326, L7 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0. -- 27 -- Fig. 1. -- A simple model spectrum N(γ) ≡ d ne(γ)/d log γ of particles accelerated within the turbulent shear layer. The acceleration process creates power-law energy distribution ended by the cut-off (the dashed line) or by the high energy pile-up bump at the maximum electron energy γeq (the soild line) (cf. Ostrowski 2000). -- 28 -- 22 27 12 17 * = 300 ssc1 ec2 ssc2 22 27 12 17 * = 900 12 17 -5 * = 50 -10 syn2 syn1 ec1 12 17 * = 600 -15 -5 -10 -15 ] 2 - m c 1 - s g r e [ ) * , * ( * S * g o l 12 17 22 27 12 17 log n * [Hz] 22 27 22 27 22 27 -5 -10 -15 -5 -10 -15 Fig. 2. -- The observed spectral energy distributions of the radiation generated within the boundary shear layer for γeq = 108 and θ∗ = 50 , 300 , 600 , 900, at the respective panels. The presented spectra are integrated over the flow Lorentz factor profile (3.9) and correspond to the parameters discussed in the text. The index '1' refers to the emission ∝ ν −1/2 of the power-law part of the electron spectrum. The index '2' refer to the emission of the high energy electron bump component. In the case of the SSC process, monoenergetic electrons contribute also to the emission ∝ ν −1/2. Absorption of VHE γ-rays during the propagation to the observer is neglected. q q q q n n q -- 29 -- boundary layer uniform jet 30 * [deg] 60 90 ] ) * - p ( * S / ) * ( * S [ g o l 8 6 4 2 0 0 10 3 10 3 Fig. 3. -- A ratio of the observed radio fluxes from the jet and the counterjet, S ∗(θ∗)/S ∗(π − θ∗), as a function of the viewing angle θ∗. The dotted lines correspond to the model with the uniform flow Lorentz factor Γj = 10 or 3 within the whole jet. The solid lines correspond to the radiation from a boundary shear layer with the radial profile (3.9) and the same Γj = 10 or 3. The Lorentz factors are provided near the respective curves. q q q -- 30 -- cj ) * ( f f , e X 1,8 1,2 0,6 0,0 j G G j = 10 j = 3 0 30 q * [deg] 60 90 Fig. 4. -- An illustration of the possible effective X-ray spectral index of a jet ('j') and a counterjet ('cj') boundary layer emission, αX,ef f , as a function of the viewing angle θ∗. The solid lines correspond to Γj = 10 and the dashed ones to Γj = 3. a q
astro-ph/0308003	2	0308	2003-11-03T12:09:25	Pixel correlation searches for OVI in the Lyman alpha forest and the volume filling factor of metals in the Intergalactic Medium at z ~ 2-3.5	[ "astro-ph" ]	Artificial absorption spectra are used to test a variety of instrumental and physical effects on the pixel correlation technique for the detection of weak OVI absorption. At HI optical depths <= 0.3-1, the apparent OVI detections are spurious coincidences due to HI absorption at other redshifts. In this range, the apparent OVI optical depth is independent of HI optical depth. At larger HI optical depths, apparent OVI optical depth and HI optical depth are correlated. Detailed modelling is required in order to interpret the significance of this relation. High-resolution spectra of four QSOs together with a large suit of synthetic spectra are used to show that the detection of OVI in individual spectra is only statistically significant for overdensities >= 5. These overdensities are larger than would be naively inferred from the onset of the correlation and a tight optical depth-density relation. The lower limit for the volume filling factor of regions which are enriched by OVI is 4% at 95% confidence. This is no larger than the observed volume filling factor of the winds from Lyman break galaxies. Previous claims that the observed OVI absorption extends to underdense regions and requires a universal metal enrichment with large volume filling factor, as may be expected from population III star formation at very high redshift, appear not to be warranted.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 11 (2003) Printed 29 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Pixel correlation searches for O VI in the Lyman α forest and the volume filling factor of metals in the Intergalactic Medium at z ∼ 2 − 3.5 Matthew M. Pieri1,3⋆ and Martin G. Haehnelt2 1 Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BW, UK 2 Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 3 Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85740 Garching, Germany Accepted 2003 October 9. Received 2003 11 August ABSTRACT Artificial absorption spectra are used to test a variety of instrumental and physical effects on the the pixel correlation technique for the detection of weak O vi absorption. At H i optical depths < ∼ 0.3 − 1, the apparent O vi detections are spurious coincidences due to H i absorption at other redshifts. In this range, the apparent O vi optical depth is independent of H i optical depth. At larger H i optical depths, apparent O vi optical depth and H i optical depth are correlated. Detailed modelling is required in order to interpret the significance of this relation. High-resolution spectra of four QSOs together with a large suit of synthetic spectra are used to show that the detection of O vi in individual spectra is only statistically significant for overdensities > ∼ 5. These overdensities are larger than would be naively inferred from the onset of the correlation and a tight optical depth-density relation. The lower limit for the volume filling factor of regions which are enriched by O vi is 4% at 95% confidence. This is no larger than the observed volume filling factor of the winds from Lyman break galaxies. Previous claims that the observed O vi absorption extends to underdense regions and requires a universal metal enrichment with large volume filling factor, as may be expected from population III star formation at very high redshift, appear not to be warranted. Key words: intergalactic medium - quasars - galaxies:formation - metal enrichment. 3 0 0 2 v o N 3 2 v 3 0 0 8 0 3 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION The Lyα forest in QSO absorption spectra is now widely believed to be caused by fluctuating Gunn-Peterson absorp- tion due to an undulating warm photoionised Intergalactic Medium (IGM). With this interpretation for the origin of the Lyα forest, it has become possible to relate the absorp- tion optical depth to the density of absorption systems in a meaningful manner. According to this scheme low column density absorption systems arise from low density regions of the Universe. A detection of associated metal absorption in weak Lyα absorption systems would suggest that the metal enrichment of the IGM is widespread. Models put forward to explain this metal en- richment fall into two categories: they either propose that early and widespread Population III star forma- tion in pre-galactic structures at z > ∼ 10 is responsible (e.g. Nath & Trentham 1997; Ferrara, Pettini & Shchekinov 2000; Barkana & Loeb 2001; Madau, Ferrara & Rees 2001) or suggest a later episode of metal enrichment by winds from starbursting galaxies at z 6 5 (e.g. Aguirre et al. 2001, Theuns et al. 2001, Adelberger et al. 2003). Trans- porting metals from the galaxies or protogalaxies where they are produced into the (low density) IGM is not, however, a trivial matter. A variety of mechanisms have been proposed. Some have argued for supernova- driven (Couchman & Rees 1986, Dekel & Silk 1986) or 'miniquasar'-driven (Haiman, Madau & Loeb 1999) winds. Others have argued for ejection via galactic mergers (Gnedin & Ostriker 1997 and Gnedin 1998) or photoevapo- ration during reionisation (Barkana & Loeb 1999). With an accurate determination of the fraction of the universe (or 'volume filling factor') enriched by metals it may be pos- sible to test the veracity of such models. A large volume filling factor would favour early enrichment by stars form- ⋆ Email: [email protected] c(cid:13) 2003 RAS 2 Matthew M. Pieri and Martin G. Haehnelt ing in shallow potential wells, out of which metals are more easily transported into low density regions. Observationally, the most important tracers of met- als in the photoionised IGM are C iv and O vi . Associated C iv absorption has been detected down to HI column densi- ties of order 1014 cm−2 (Tytler et al. 1995, Cowie et al. 1995, Ellison et al. 2000, Pettini et al. 2003) corresponding to an optical depth of 1 − 10. To investigate even lower density systems a pixel correlation technique has been employed where, instead of fitting an associated C iv absorption line, a pixel-by-pixel search for excess absorption at the corre- sponding C iv wavelength is performed (Cowie & Songaila 1998). This method was hoped to be more robust than the use of line 'stacking' (Tytler et al. 1995; Ellison et al. 2000), but there is some ambiguity in the interpretation of the results. At the relevant redshifts, the O vi species is the most sensitive tracer of metals in low density regions of the IGM, provided that the spectrum of the UV background is sufficiently hard (Rauch, Haehnelt & Steinmetz 1997 and Hellsten et al. 1998). However, the relevant O vi absorption lines (λOvia = 1032A, λOvib = 1038A) occur in the same wavelength range as the Lyman α forest and higher order lines of the Lyman series, which makes the detection of weak O vi absorption challenging. Schaye et al. (2000) claim to have detected O vi at H i optical depths significantly smaller than unity in some QSO absorption spectra and used the optical depth-density relation of numerical hydrodynamic simulations to argue that this indicates a detection of metals in underdense re- gions of the IGM. In this work, we apply the pixel-by- pixel search to synthetic spectra and thereby investigate in- strumental and physical effects on this technique (see also Aguirre, Schaye & Theuns 2002). We then assess the sta- tistical significance of the O vi detection and the implied density threshold above which the presence of metals is con- fidently detected. The spectra (both simulated and observed) are de- scribed in Section 2. In Section 3 we outline the pixel correla- tion method used to detect the presence of O vi absorption. The results of the search for O vi are shown and discussed in Section 4. In Section 5 we explore the consequences for the metal enrichment of the low density IGM. 2 SIMULATED AND OBSERVED SPECTRA 2.1 Calculating synthetic spectra 2.1.1 Basic Assumptions We use the method developed by Bi (Bi, Boerner & Chu 1992; Bi & Davidsen 1997) to analytically calculate syn- thetic spectra in the fluctuating Gunn-Peterson approxima- tion for a warm photoionised IGM with a density distribu- tion that is expected in a ΛCDM structure formation model. The basic assumptions are: (i) the baryonic matter traces the dark matter on scales larger than a filtering scale, which is related to the Jeans scale; (ii) the distribution of mildly non-linear densities has a lognormal probability distribution function (PDF); (iii) the absorbing gas obeys a simple temperature- density relation and is not shock-heated. Table 1. Model parameters used for all simulations Parameter Chosen Value Ωm h Ωλ σ8 log[ ¯Teff ] µ Γ 0.3 0.65 0.7 0.9 4.6 0.641 1.333 Table 1 shows the model parameters. A brief summary of how we calculate the synthetic spectra follows. 2.1.2 The Spatial Distribution of Baryons According to standard structure formation models the mat- ter distribution was initially a Gaussian random field with small density fluctuations that evolve under gravity into the pattern of sheets and filaments characteristic of CDM mod- els. Many features of such a distribution can be reproduced by a rank-ordered mapping of a linear Gaussian random field onto a lognormal PDF of the density. This idea is at the heart of the method used to calculate synthetic absorption spectra (Bi et al. 1992). This method is an efficient way of producing large numbers of realistic synthetic spectra. Note that we are interested in producing synthetic spectra with a realistic density PDF and realistic instrumental proper- ties. Reproducing the detailed clustering properties of the density field is less important. We begin by creating a linear Gaussian random field which is fully determined by its power spectrum, PDM (k), for which we have used the form given by Efstathiou, Bond & White (1992), PDM(k) ∝ (1 + [ak + (bk)3/2 + (ck)2]ν)2/ν , k (1) where a = 6.4/Γ, b = 3.0/Γ, c = 1.7/Γ, Γ = Ωmh (Ωm & h have their normal definitions) and ν = 1.13. The power spectrum was normalised by the rms fluctuation amplitude on a 8h−1Mpc scale, σ8, as given in Table 1. In order to take into account pressure effects that suppress fluctuations on scales smaller than a certain filtering scale (Gnedin & Hui 1998) the power spectrum of the baryon density in the linear regime is assumed to have the form, PB(k) = PDM(k) (1 + x2 bk2)2 , xb =(cid:20) 2γk ¯Teff 3µmpΩ(1 + z)(cid:21) 1 2 , (2) where xb is a comoving scale related to the Jeans length (Peebles 1980; Bi & Davidsen 1997), γ is the ratio of specific heats, ¯Teff is the effective mean temperature and µ is the molecular weight of the IGM. An appropriate value for ¯Teff has been determined from comparison with hydrodynamic simulations by Bi & Davidsen (1997). This is the baryonic matter power spectrum at z = 0 and linear theory is used to evolve it backward to high redshift. Equations (1) and (2) provide the 3D power spectrum. A 1D power spectrum needed for the description of line-of- sight (LOS) fluctuations is obtained by an integration of the c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 Pixel correlation searches for O VI in the Lyman α forest 3 Table 2. Observed Data Sample QSO Q1122-165 Q1442+293 Q1107+485 Q1422+231 zem 2.40 2.67 3.00 3.62 zrange ¯Dovi ¯Dhi 2.02-2.34 2.51-2.63 2.71-2.95 3.22-3.53 0.157 0.194 0.254 0.418 0.165 0.193 0.253 0.386 3D power spectrum (Kaiser & Peacock 1991). The matter density and the peculiar velocity field are related and can be described as coupled Gaussian random fields (see Bi et al. 1992 for more details). Random realisations of the density and peculiar velocity in real space (co-moving coordinates) are obtained using a Fourier transform routine. The non- linear evolution is modelled by a local rank-ordered mapping to a lognormal density probability distribution, n/¯n = exp(cid:20)δ(x) − hδ2i 2 (cid:21) . (3) where δ = (n − ¯n)/¯n and n/¯n is the overdensity fac- tor. At the relevant redshift the baryonic density field is still in the mildly non-linear regime and the use of a log- normal PDF is a reasonable assumption (Bi et al. 1992; Nusser & Haehnelt 2000). 2.1.3 From the density to the absorption spectrum The H i optical depth depends not only on the density but also on the temperature of the gas, due to the tem- perature dependence of the recombination rate. For den- sities n/¯n < ∼ 10, numerical simulations show that most of the gas is not shocked and that a simple power law re- lation between density and temperature is established by the balance of photoionisation heating and adiabatic cool- ing (Hui & Gnedin 1997), T = T0(n/¯n)α, (4) ∼ α < ∼ 0.6 and T0 is a constant. where 0.3 < For gas at temperatures of a few times 104K in pho- toionisation equilibrium the neutral hydrogen density is pro- portional to n2T −0.7/ΓH i, where ΓH i is the photoionisa- tion rate. As a result, the optical depth to Lyα absorption at redshift z can be written as component of the Hubble parameter and σ0 is the cross- section for resonant Lyα scattering. The effect of peculiar velocity and Doppler broadening are taken into account to obtain the optical depth in redshift space. We have thereby approximated the Voigt profile by a Gaussian distribution, which is a reasonable approximation for absorption lines with equivalent width < 0.7A. The optical depth for the O vi doublet is calculated as- suming a fixed ratio of O vi number density to H i number density (nOVI/nHI). The optical depth of the higher order Lyman lines are also calculated. 2.1.4 Realistic Synthetic Spectra To facilitate a more accurate comparison with the observed spectra we model the optical depth distribution for the same wavelength range as the observed spectra. There are two re- gions of the spectra of particular interest; the 'O vi region', where O vi absorption is searched for, and the 'H i region', where the corresponding Lyα absorption occurs. The spec- tra are obtained by co-adding the optical depth of Lyα, O vi and higher order Lyman series lines. We then use the estimated statistical error on the flux for the observed spec- trum to add random noise and perform a Gaussian smooth- ing to mimic the effect of instrumental broadening. The optical depth is scaled such that the mean flux decrement of the observed QSO is reproduced. As we will discuss later the results of the pixel-by-pixel search depend sensitively on the mean flux level. We have thus rescaled the optical depth for the H i and the O vi regions indepen- dently to reproduce the observed mean flux level in both regions ( ¯Dhi and ¯Dovi respectively). ¯Dhi is used to set ¯τLyα in the H i region as well as ¯τOvi (with fixed nOVI/nHI) and the optical depth of the higher order Lyman lines in the O vi region. ¯DOvi is then used to set ¯τLyα in the O vi region. Note that this means that we allow a difference in the value of Ω2 bar/ΓHi in the two regions of the spectrum. It seems plausible to assume that the errors we obtain in this way for a range of Monte Carlo realisations of the LOS density distribution are similar to those we would have found if we had only picked random realisations that can reproduce the mean flux decrement in the H i and the O vi regions simulta- neously. The latter approach is computationally prohibitive. In this way we have obtained ensembles of simulated spectra with the same wavelength range, mean flux decre- ment and noise properties as the observed spectra, but dif- fering in their specific random realisation of LOS matter distribution and noise. τLyα(z) = σ0 ¯nHII(z), (5) 2.2 Observations where I(z) =Z z2 z1 cdz ′ 1 + z c H0E(z ′) (cid:18) n(z ′) ¯n (cid:19)1.7 1 b exp −(cid:18) c(z − z ′) (1 + z) + vpec(z ′)(cid:19)2,b2! , (6) z1 and z2 are the lower and upper limits of the redshift region of interest, b is the Doppler parameter, nHI is the neutral hydrogen density, vpec is the peculiar velocity and a value α = 0.4 is assumed. E(z) is the redshift dependent c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 We have used four observed QSOs which are part of the sample used by Schaye et al. (2000) for a detailed compar- ison with synthetic QSOs spectra: Q1122-165, Q1442+293, Q1107+485 and Q1422+231. The data for Q1122-165 was taken during Commissioning I and Science Verification ob- servations for the UVES instrument on the VLT (Kueyen) and released by ESO for public use. The reduction method can be found in Kim, Cristiani & D'Odorico (2001). The other spectra were taken with the HIRES instrument (Vogt S. S. et al. 1994) on Keck I and reduced using pro- cedures described in Barlow & Sargent (1997). These two 4 Matthew M. Pieri and Martin G. Haehnelt n OVI HIn <D>OVI (n /<n>) cut 2. A sketch showing Figure τOVI,app − τLyα relation on the principal parameters nOVI/nHI and (n/¯n)cut. the dependence of the ¯DOvi, Figure 1. An example of the results from the pixel-by-pixel search method for the absorption spectrum of Q1107+485. instruments provide spectra with resolutions Rmax ≈ 80000 and 110000 respectively and have typical S/N of 50. Table 2 gives a list of the redshift range and flux decrement for the O vi and H i regions. Regions of strong absorption from other known metal lines were removed. 3 PIXEL-BY-PIXEL SEARCH We use a technique for the detection of O vi in the Lyman α forest initially developed by Cowie & Songaila (1998) for the detection of weak C iv absorption. Schaye et al. (2000) adapted this method to search for the O vi doublet (see also Aguirre et al. 2002). We briefly summarise the procedure here. The redshift range explored in each of the four QSOs is shown in Table 2. This is the same as used by Schaye et al. (2000). Due to the increase in noise we did not find it worth- while to extend the search to lower wavelength. The continuum-fitted absorption spectrum is re-binned to pixels of equal size in redshift space for the Lyman se- ries and both members of the O vi doublet. A width of (c∆λ/λLyn)kms−1 is taken (where Lyn is the highest or- der Lyman line used). In order to take into account possible velocity shifts between O vi and H i absorption, we have also tried larger pixels widths. This did not improve the sensi- tivity for O vi detection. A search for correlated absorption at the wavelengths of the Lyman series and the O vi doublet is then performed. Each pixel of the Lyα absorption region is considered in turn. If the flux level is within σnoi/2 of the continuum level (where σnoi is the estimated statistical error on the flux for the observed spectrum) or in a region where the associated O vi absorption is not covered the pixel is discarded. If the pixel is within σnoi/2 of saturation we attempt to use the higher order Lyman lines to estimate τLyα. We thereby use the higher order line with the lowest equivalent Lyα optical depth τLyα = min(τLynfLyα/fLynλLyn) that is not within σnoi/2 of saturation or the continuum (where fLyn is the oscillator strength of the Lyn line). Once we have established a value for τLyα, we consider the pixels corresponding to absorption by the O vi doublet at the same redshift. The limiting factor in the use of this method is coincident absorption from H i, either in the form of higher order Lyman lines at similar redshift or by Lyα lines at lower redshift. Obviously we want to min- imise this contamination. The doublet nature of the O vi is utilised in this regard. The smaller equivalent absorption, τOvi = min(cid:18)τOvia, fOviaλOviaτOvib fOvibλOvib (cid:19) , (7) will be the least contaminated. This gives us an up- per limit to the O vi optical depth. We will thus call the O vi optical depth obtained in this way the apparent O vi optical depth. As pointed out by Aguirre et al. (2002) the contam- ination by higher order Lyman lines can be estimated from the corresponding Lyα absorption and corrected. Such contamination is subtracted from the O vi optical depth where possible. If this is not possible because of saturated Lyα absorption we also discard the pixel. We then bin the ensemble of optical depth pairs in Lyα optical depth and plot the relation between the median optical depth of O vi and Lyα . We use the median instead of the mean as the distribution of O vi optical depth in each bin is skewed toward high optical depths due to the contam- ination by H i absorption. Fig. 1 shows an example of the relation of the apparent O vi and Lyα optical depth (τOVI,app − τLyα relation) ob- tained in this way. At small Lyα optical depth, the median O vi optical depth is constant. As we will demonstrate in detail in the next section (see also Aguirre et al. (2002)), the apparent O vi is here almost exclusively due to contam- ination of coincident H i absorption and this region of the diagram cannot be used to infer a detection of O vi . At larger Lyα optical depth, the apparent O vi optical depth rises and is mainly due to the presence of O vi . The level of metal enrichment is, however, not straightforward and requires detailed modelling. 4 RESULTS FROM SIMULATED SPECTRA 4.1 Principle parameters To obtain an indication of how the pixel-by-pixel search de- pends upon instrumental effects and physical parameters and what errors should be expected due to variation of the LOS density distributions, we investigated a large suit c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 Pixel correlation searches for O VI in the Lyman α forest 5 Figure 3. The τOVI,app − τLyα relation for an ensemble of forty synthetic spectra. Left: ¯DOVI increases from bottom to top. Right: ¯DHI increases from bottom to top of synthetic spectra. We have varied the mean flux decre- ment in the O vi and H i regions ( ¯DOvi and ¯DHi), the ratio of O vi to H i density (nOvi/nHi) and introduced a varying cut-off in the density below which we set the O vi density to zero ((n/¯n)cut ). Fig. 2 sketches how the relation of ap- parent O vi optical depth and Lyα optical depth depends on the three key parameters ¯DOvi, (n/¯n)cut and nOvi/nHi. A detailed discussion of the effect of these and the other pa- rameters using synthetic spectra of Q1122 will follow below. The parameters were varied around fiducial values denoted by an 'F' in figures 3-5. The error bars in these figures are the 1σ spread of the optical depths for ensembles of 40 spectra. 4.2 Varying the mean optical depth Fig. 3 shows how changing the mean flux decrement af- fects the τOVI,app − τLyα relation. In the left panels we con- sider changes in the O vi region, ¯DOvi. With increasing flux decrement the level of spurious coincidences due to Lyα absorption from gas at a lower redshift rises and mim- ics the detection of O vi . Since this Lyα absorption is un- correlated with absorption in the H i region, this leads to a floor of constant apparent O vi optical depth which rises with increasing ¯DOvi. In the right panels of Fig. 3 we vary the mean flux decrement in the H i region ¯DHi. This time the shape of the relation between H i optical depth and ap- c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 parent O vi optical depth does not change but the error bars increase substantially with decreasing mean flux decrement. This is because, for small mean flux decrement, large optical depth Lyα pixels are poorly sampled. 4.3 Varying the O vi distribution In Fig. 4 we vary the O vi distribution for our synthetic spectra. The left panels shows how varying the ratio of O vi to H i density affects the τOVI,app − τLyα relation. With increasing ratio a correlation between apparent O vi optical depth and H i optical depth develops for large H i optical depth but the errors are large. As discussed in the introduc- tion the main aim of the search for O vi at small H i optical depth is to establish the volume filling factor of metals in the Universe. Because of the possible spurious detections due to random coincidences this is not straightforward. There is another important effect which can lead to spu- rious detection of O vi . Low Lyα optical depth is not neces- sarily associated with low density gas but can also be due to the wing of a strong Lyα absorption feature which is caused by a high density region. In order to test the density range for which the presence of O vi is required to reproduce the observed τOVI,app − τLyα relation, we introduce a cut-off in 6 Matthew M. Pieri and Martin G. Haehnelt Figure 4. As Figure 3. Left: nOvi/nH i increases from top to bottom. Right: (n/¯n)cut increases from top to bottom. the density, (n/¯n)cut below which we set the O vi density to zero, i.e. 4.4 Varying S/N and continuum level nOV I nHI = 0, if n ¯n <(cid:16) n ¯n(cid:17)cut , nOV I nHI = const, if n ¯n > (cid:16) n ¯n(cid:17)cut . (8) (9) In the right panel of Fig. 4 we vary (n/¯n)cut. The onset of the correlation moves to larger H i optical depth. Unfor- tunately, this dependence is weak. The left panels of Fig. 5 show the effect of changing the sim- ulated noise. As expected, the errors increase significantly with increasing noise level. The effect of an error in the continuum fit is shown in the right panels of Fig. 5, where we have raised and lowered the continuum as a whole by 1% in each synthetic spectrum. When we raise the continuum level the apparent O vi optical depth increases because the optical depth of spuriously coin- cident H i absorption increases. Note that if the continuum is placed too low the correlation between H i and O vi optical depth misleadingly appears to extend to smaller H i optical depth. c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 Pixel correlation searches for O VI in the Lyman α forest 7 Figure 5. As Figure 3. Left: noise increases from top to bottom. Right: the continuum level increases from top to bottom. 5 SEARCH FOR O vi IN THE LOW DENSITY IGM 5.1 Comparison of real and simulated spectra Here we perform a detailed comparison between four ob- served QSO spectra and sets of synthetic spectra. We use the same S/N, ¯DOVI, ¯DHI and wavelength range as in the observed spectra with one exception. In the case of Q1122 we decrease ¯DOVI by 35% in order to reproduce the level of apparent τOvi at low τHi. The need for this is most likely due to a deficit of saturated regions in our synthetic spec- tra. The contribution of saturated regions to the mean flux decrement is high at low redshift and the failure to ade- quately reproduce the high incidence of these systems leads to a bias in the mean flux decrement (Viel et al. 2003). The triangles in the left panel of Fig. 6 show the τOVI,app − τLyα relation for the four observed spectra. For the synthetic spectra we assume as before that the O vi distribution takes the form described in equations (8) and (9). We have varied the O vi density and the overden- sity threshold for addition of O vi over the range nOVI/nHI = 0 − 0.3 and (n/¯n)cut = 0 − 100. We have produced samples of 40 synthetic spectra for each set of values. We have then calculated the τOVI,app − τLyα relation for each sample and assessed the agreement with the observed relation by cal- culating χ2. Note, however, that there may be additional c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 sources of error such inhomogeneities in the metal distribu- tion which our Monte Carlo technique does not take into account. The crosses and squares in the left panels of Fig. 6 show the τOVI,app − τLyα relation with no O vi and the best fitting values for nOVI/nHI ((n/¯n)cut = 0), respectively. The best fitting value has a reduced χ2 r close to or somewhat smaller than one. There is thus good agreement between the τOVI,app − τLyα relation for our best fitting simulations and the real data. In the right panels of Fig. 6 we use the τOVI,app − τLyα relation of synthetic and observed spectra for Q1107 to provide an example of the difficulty in con- straining (n/¯n)cut . The top panel of Fig. 7 shows the reduced χ2 r as a func- tion of nOVI/nHI for the four observed QSOs. In Q1442 there is a marginal detection of O vi, in Q1107 O vi is detected with a poorly constrained O vi density (nOVI/nHI ≈ 0.08) while in Q1122 O vi is clearly detected with nOVI/nHI ≈ 0.06. In Q1422 no O vi is detected. Indeed, we find that the spectrum of Q1422 is inconsistent with O vi absorption at the same level as detected in Q1122 and Q1107 with a con- fidence of greater than 99%. In the bottom panel of Fig. 7 we show how the reduced χ2 r varies as a function of (n/¯n)cut.We have assumed that nOVI/nHI and (n/¯n)cut are independent in the calculation of the confidence level. (n/¯n)cut of greater than 4 for Q1122, 7 for Q1107 and 4 for Q1442 are ruled out with 95% confi- 8 Matthew M. Pieri and Martin G. Haehnelt Figure 6. Right: the τOVI,app − τLyα relation for observed and simulated synthetic spectra for four QSOs; this is shown for synthetic spectra with both the best best fitting constant ratio of nOvi/nHi and with no O vi . Left: the effect of varying (n/¯n)cut on synthetic spectra of Q1107 compared to the τOVI,app − τLyα relation of the observed spectrum. c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 Pixel correlation searches for O VI in the Lyman α forest 9 Figure 7. Results of a χ2 ulated and observed τOvi. The top panel shows χ2 nOvi/nHi. The bottom panel shows χ2 χ2 r test of the agreement between sim- r for varying r for varying (n/¯n)cut . The r values for no O vi and a constant nOvi/nHi are also shown. dence. There is thus no significant detection of O vi at over- densities < ∼ 5. 5.2 Other searches for O vi absorption in the observed sample Schaye et al. (2000) have claimed that the correlation of apparent O vi optical depth and H i extends to τHi ∼ 0.1 in the case of Q1122, Q1107 and Q1442. They have in- terpreted this as a detection of O vi in underdense re- gions with n/¯n ∼ 0.3 − 0.5. We cannot confirm this with our more detailed analysis. Dav´e et al. (1998) found that Q1422 is consistent with no O vi in a search for weak O vi absorption lines consistent with our result. Note that they detected O vi in a O vi-C iv pixel corre- lation search which probed large Lyα optical depth. In the spectrum of Q1442, Simcoe, Sargent & Rauch (2002) found two strong O vi systems associated with high col- umn density H i absorption systems but no weak ab- sorption systems consistent with our marginal detection. Carswell, Schaye & Kim (2002) found a large number of O vi absorption systems associated with low and high col- c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 Figure 8. The volume filling factor (top panel) and the mass fraction (bottom panel) as a function of gas overdensity for a lognormal density PDF at the redshift of the four observed QSOs. umn density H i absorption systems in the spectrum of Q1122 again consistent with our results. 5.3 Implications for the metal enrichment of the IGM The lack of a significant detection of O vi at low densities cannot be used as evidence against the presence of these metals. As discussed extensively in the previous section, O vi at these densities may be masked by H i absorption. Also, at high redshift the spectrum of the UV background may not be hard enough to ionise oxygen up to O vi. The decreasing contamination by H i absorption (due to an ex- pected lower ¯τLyα) is likely to be the main reason why the lowest redshift QSO in the sample is the only one for which we clearly detect O vi at moderate overdensities. Fig. 8 shows how the volume filling factor depends on overdensity for the lognormal density PDF in the red- shift ranges of the observed QSO absorption. For this PDF the 95% confidence limits for the density threshold, (n/¯n)cut, translate into lower limits of 4%, 1.5% and 4% for the volume filling factor of O vi for Q1122 (z = 2.0 − 2.3), Q1107 (z = 2.7 − 3.0) and Q1442 (z = 2.5 − 2.6), respec- tively. There appears to be no evidence for a large volume filling factor of metals from the observed oxygen absorp- tion. A lower limit of 1.5 − 4% for the volume filling factor is no larger than that inferred for winds from Lyman break 10 Matthew M. Pieri and Martin G. Haehnelt galaxies (Adelberger et al. 2003). A picture where metal enrichment is due to winds from rather large galaxies at z ∼ 2 − 5 is consistent with the observed O vi absorption in QSO spectra. Haehnelt (1998) and Pettini et al. (2003) find that the same is true for the observed C iv absorption, although Schaye et al. (2003) may find new evidence of rel- evance. Fig. 8 also shows the relation between mass fraction and overdensity for the lognormal density distribution. Despite the rather low inferred volume filling factor for which metals have been detected, about 20-40 % of baryons must already be enriched with metals to explain the observed absorption. 6 CONCLUSIONS We have used a large sample of synthetic spectra which mimic the observational properties of four observed QSO spectra to interpret the results of a search for O vi in the low density IGM. Our results can be summarised as follows. (1) At low Lyα optical depth the corresponding appar- ent O vi optical depth obtained by using the pixel corre- lation technique developed by Cowie & Songaila (1998) and Schaye et al. (2000) depends mainly on the mean flux decre- ment in the O vi region of the spectrum. (2) In a sample of four QSO in the redshift range 2-3.5 we detect O vi significantly in two QSOs and marginally in the third. The significance of the detection increases with decreasing redshift. (3) The position of the bend in the relation of apparent O vi and Lyα optical depth depends only weakly on the low- est density at which OVI is present in the IGM. (4) We obtain upper limits of 4, 7 and 4 for the min- imum density for which O vi has been detected with 95% confidence. For the lognormal model density distribution this translates into lower limits of 4%, 1.5% and 4% for the volume filling factor of metals. We thus do not confirm previous claims of a detection of O vi in underdense regions and a corresponding large volume filling factor of metals. (5) The O vi absorption in QSO absorption spectra as de- tected by the pixel correlation technique provides no ev- idence for (or against) a widespread metal enrichment at very high redshift (z ∼ 10 − 20). The lower limit for the vol- ume filling factor of metals is equally consistent with metal enrichment by winds from Lyman break galaxies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank Michael Rauch, Len Cowie and ESO for providing the observed spectra and the referee Anthony Aguiree for a helpful report. The authors would further like to thank Steve Warren for his useful suggestions and Alex King and Thomas Babbedge for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the European Community Research and Training Network "The Physics of the Intergalactic Medium" REFERENCES Adelberger K. L., Steidel C. C., Shapley A. E., Pettini M., 2003, ApJ, 584, 45 Aguirre A., Hernquist L., Schaye J., Weinberg D. H., Katz N., Gardner J., 2001, ApJ, 560, 599 Aguirre A., Schaye J., Theuns T., 2002, ApJ, 576, 1 Barkana R., Loeb A., 1999, ApJ, 523, 54 Barkana R., Loeb A., 2001, Phys. Rep., 349, 125 Barlow T. A., Sargent W. L. W., 1997, AJ, 113, 136 Bi H., Davidsen A. F., 1997, ApJ, 479, 523 Bi H. G., Boerner G., Chu Y., 1992, A&A, 266, 1 Carswell B., Schaye J., Kim T.-S., 2002, ApJ, 578, 43 Couchman H. M. P., Rees M. J., 1986, MNRAS, 221, 53 Cowie L. L., Songaila A., 1998, Nat, 394, 44 Cowie L. L., Songaila A., Kim T.-S., Hu E. M., 1995, AJ, 109, 1522 Dav´e R., Hellsten U., Hernquist L., Katz N., Weinberg D. H., 1998, ApJ, 509, 661 Dekel A., Silk J., 1986, ApJ, 303, 39 Efstathiou G., Bond J. R., White S. D. M., 1992, MNRAS, 258, 1P Ellison S. L., Songaila A., Schaye J., Pettini M., 2000, AJ, 120, 1175 Ferrara A., Pettini M., Shchekinov Y., 2000, MNRAS, 319, 539 Gnedin N. Y., 1998, MNRAS, 294, 407 Gnedin N. Y., Hui L., 1998, MNRAS, 296, 44 Gnedin N. Y., Ostriker J. P., 1997, ApJ, 486, 581 Haehnelt M. G., 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 146: The Young Universe: Galaxy Formation and Evolution at Intermedi- ate and High Redshift Probing beyond the epoch of galaxy formation. p. 249 Haiman Z., Madau P., Loeb A., 1999, ApJ, 514, 535 Hellsten U., Hernquist L., Katz N., Weinberg D. H., 1998, ApJ, 499, 172 Hui L., Gnedin N. Y., 1997, MNRAS, 292, 27 Kaiser N., Peacock J. A., 1991, ApJ, 379, 482 Kim T.-S., Cristiani S., D'Odorico S., 2001, A&A, 373, 757 Madau P., Ferrara A., Rees M. J., 2001, ApJ, 555, 92 Nath B. B., Trentham N., 1997, MNRAS, 291, 505 Nusser A., Haehnelt M., 2000, MNRAS, 313, 364 Peebles P. J. E., 1980, The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ Pettini M., Madau P., Bolte M., Prochaska J. X., Ellison S. L., Fan X., 2003, preprint, (astro-ph/0305413) Rauch M., Haehnelt M. G., Steinmetz M., 1997, ApJ, 481, 601 Schaye J., Aguirre A., Kim T.-S., Theuns T., Rauch M., Sargent W. L. W., 2003, preprint, (astro-ph/0306469) Schaye J., Rauch M., Sargent W. L. W., Kim T.-S., 2000, ApJ, 541, L1 Simcoe R. A., Sargent W. L. W., Rauch M., 2002, ApJ, 578, 737 Theuns T., Mo H. J., Schaye J., 2001, MNRAS, 321, 450 Tytler D., Fan X.-M., Burles S., Cottrell L., Davis C., Kirk- man D., Zuo L., 1995, in QSO Absorption Lines, Pro- ceedings of the ESO Workshop Held at Garching, Ger- many, 21 - 24 November 1994, edited by Georges Meylan. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. Also ESO Astrophysics Symposia, 1995., p.289 Ionization and Abun- dances of Intergalactic Gas. p. 289 c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11 Pixel correlation searches for O VI in the Lyman α forest 11 Viel M., Haehnelt M. G., Carswell R. F., Kim T. S., 2003, preprint, (astro-ph/03068078) Vogt S. S. et al. 1994, in Proc. SPIE Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII Vol. 2198, HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope. p. 362 c(cid:13) 2003 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 11
astro-ph/9508062	1	9508	1995-08-15T20:33:35	Occlusion Effects and the Distribution of Interstellar Cloud Sizes and Masses	[ "astro-ph" ]	The frequency distributions of sizes of ``clouds" and ``clumps" within clouds are significantly flatter for extinction surveys than for CO spectral line surveys, even for comparable size ranges. A possible explanation is the blocking of extinction clouds by larger foreground clouds (occlusion), which should not affect spectral line surveys much because clouds are resolved in velocity space along a given line of sight. We present a simple derivation of the relation between the true and occluded size distributions, assuming clouds are uniformly distributed in space or the distance to a cloud comples is much greater than the size of the complex. Because the occlusion is dominated by the largest clouds, we find that occlusion does not affect the measured size distribution except for sizes comparable to the largest size, implying that occlusion is not responsible for the discrepancy if the range in sizes of the samples is large. However, we find that the range in sizes for many of the published observed samples is actually quite small, which suggests that occlusion does affect the extinction sample and/or that the discrepancy could arise from the different operational definitions and selection effects involved in the two samples. Size and mass spectra from an IRAS survey (Wood \etal\ 1994) suggest that selection effects play a major role in all the surveys. We conclude that a reliable determination of the ``true" size and mass spectra of clouds will require spectral line surveys with very high signal-to-noise and sufficient resolution and sampling to cover a larger range of linear sizes, as well as careful attention to selection effects.	astro-ph	astro-ph	OCCLUSION EFFECTS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF INTERSTELLAR CLOUD SIZES AND MASSES John Scalo and A. Lazarian Astronomy Department, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1083 Received ; accepted Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal 5 9 9 1 g u A 5 1 1 v 2 6 0 8 0 5 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a – 2 – ABSTRACT The frequency distributions of sizes of “clouds” and “clumps” within clouds are significantly flatter for extinction surveys than for CO spectral line surveys, even for comparable size ranges. A possible explanation is the blocking of extinction clouds by larger foreground clouds (occlusion), which should not affect spectral line surveys much because clouds are resolved in velocity space along a given line of sight. We present a simple derivation of the relation between the true and occluded size distributions, assuming clouds are uniformly distributed in space or the distance to a cloud comples is much greater than the size of the complex. Because the occlusion is dominated by the largest clouds, we find that occlusion does not affect the measured size distribution except for sizes comparable to the largest size, implying that occlusion is not responsible for the discrepancy if the range in sizes of the samples is large. However, we find that the range in sizes for many of the published observed samples is actually quite small, which suggests that occlusion does affect the extinction sample and/or that the discrepancy could arise from the different operational definitions and selection effects involved in the two samples. Size and mass spectra from an IRAS survey (Wood et al. 1994) suggest that selection effects play a ma jor role in all the surveys. We conclude that a reliable determination of the “true” size and mass spectra of clouds will require spectral line surveys with very high signal-to-noise and sufficient resolution and sampling to cover a larger range of linear sizes, as well as careful attention to selection effects. Subject headings: molecular clouds, interstellar medium – 3 – 1. Introduction The mass spectrum of density fluctuations, defined in various operational ways as “clouds”, is an important function that must be related to the processes by which clouds form and evolve and to the mass spectrum of stars that form within these clouds. A fairly large and growing number of studies of (mostly) molecular clouds yield a differential mass spectrum which, if fit by a power law, has a form f (m) ∼ m−γ , with γ ∼ −1.5 ± 0.2. These studies are primarily based on masses derived from column densities inferred from 13CO spectral line observations and linear size. Some of the results are for surveys that cover a significant area of the Galactic disk, e.g. the second quadrant survey of Casoli et al. (1984), who find γ = −1.4 to −1.6 in both the Perseus and Orion arms, the 12CO first quadrant survey by Sanders et al. (1985) who find γ ∼ −1.6 using virial masses, and the recent comparison of 204 inner- and outer- galaxy molecular clouds by Brand and Wouterloot (1995), who find γ = −1.6 for outer Galaxy clouds and γ = −1.8 for all 204 clouds. These surveys together cover a mass range from about 100 M⊙ to over 106 M⊙ , although each individual study generally covers a much smaller mass range over which a power law is an adequate fit. Other work has concentrated on the mass spectrum of “clumps” within individual clouds complexes, and find similar mass spectra in regions as different in star formation properties as the Maddalena-Thaddeus cloud (Williams, deGeus and Blitz 1994), which shows no evidence for star formation, the ρ-Oph core region (Loren 1989 as revised by Blitz 1993), which is forming low- to intermediate- mass stars, the Rosette Molecular Cloud (Williams et al. 1994, Williams and Blitz 1995), the M17SW cloud (Stutzki and Gusten 1990), and the Orion region (Lada, Bally, and Stark 1991, Tatematsu et al. 1993), all of which are actively forming stars up to large masses, and even lower-mass clumps in MBM 12, a molecular cloud that is not gravitationally bound (Pound 1994). All these studies give γ ∼ −1.5 ± 0.3 (the flattest being the Williams and Blitz result for the Rosette cloud, with γ ∼ −1.3). However there is a probable discrepancy when these results are compared with studies of the mass spectra of clouds derived using extinction surveys, which are also based on masses from sizes and column densities. If the distribution of sizes is given by f (r) ∼ rα and the cloud internal density n is related to size by n ∝ rp , then the mass spectrum is f (m) ∼ mγ with γ = (α − p − 2)/(3 + p). Estimates of p are uncertain and vary from (at least) p ∼ −1.2(see Scalo 1985, 1987) to p = 0 (sizes or masses uncorrelated with density, e.g. Casoli et al. 1984, Williams and Blitz 1995), or that the correlation is at least in part an artifact due to selection effects (Scalo 1990). The spectral line studies mentioned earlier give values of α around -2 to -2.5, based either on the published size data when available or on the above transformation between mass and size spectra. – 4 – Scalo (1985) presented the frequency distribution of angular surface areas of dark clouds from the catalogues of Lynds (1962) and Khavtassi (1960). The resulting size spectrum, if fit by a power law, has α ∼ −1.4 ± 0.2, much flatter than the size distributions inferred from the spectral line surveys. The implied mass spectra (γ ∼ −1.2 ± 0.3) seem significantly flatter than the spectral line mass spectrum, but, because of the above relationship between size and mass spectra (which gives ∆α = (2 − 3)∆γ for p = −1 to 0), and because size is a directly measured quantity in both types of studies, the discrepancy is more clearly seen in the size spectrum. Feitzinger and Stuwe (1986) studied the statistics of the combined sample of Lynds clouds and their own Southern dark cloud survey, and found a distribution of areas proportional to (area)−1 . The corresponding size spectrum has α = −1. This gives a mass spectrum index of -1 for any p. Thus the discrepancy with the molecular line survey size or mass spectra is even larger. Other published studies of mass spectra based on extinction are not so clear, but point in the same direction, especially for lower-mass clumps (e.g. Bhatt et al. 1984) for Lynds clouds in Orion, ρ Oph, and Taurus. Drapatz and Zinnecker (1981) give size and mass spectra for several samples based on both extinction and CO. In the present paper we examine the possibility that this flatter size spectrum seen in extinction is due to the effects of occlusion (smaller clouds being hidden behind large clouds) on the extinction studies; this effect would not affect the spectral line studies nearly as much because in that case two clouds along the same line of sight can be distinguished in velocity space. (Of course occlusion in velocity space can also occur; we discuss this briefly in § 3 below.) We derive an expression for the real size distribution of clouds in terms of the measured distribution that is affected by binary occlusion and derive the range of parameters over which the difference in size spectra between the two approaches can be reconciled. A relation between the distribution of physical sizes of clouds and their angular sizes is established in § 2, while a relation between the actual distribution of angular sizes and the distribution measured in the presence of occlusion is presented in § 3. 2. “Apparent” sizes of clouds Consider that N1 (l) is the ‘real’ size distribution and N2 (θ) is the “apparent” angular size distribution, without accounting for occlusion. In this seciton we define the relation between N1(l) and N2 (θ). This problem is similar to the one discussed in Feitzinger and Stuwe (1986). Due to the geometry of diverging lines of sight, clouds with the same – 5 – physical size but at different distances from the observer will fall into different ranges of apparent angular sizes. As a first approximation, assume the “true” properties of clouds to be independent of the distance from the observer. This is probably reasonable for observations in the galactic plane and of nearby individual cloud complexes (e.g. Taurus, Oph, Chameleon, Orion,. . .) In our model, the distribution of clouds at distance r is given by the product (D)N1 (l), where (D) is the total density of clouds at distance D, and we take N1(ℓ) normalized to unity. Then the number of clouds within the distance interval D , D + dD is (D)ωD2dD , where ω is the solid angle. Within this volume, the clouds with sizes from Dθ to (θ + dθ)D , where θ is the angular size of clouds, will contribute to the apparent angular cloud distribution N2(θ). The total number of “pro jections” with angular sizes (θ, θ + dθ) within the solid angle ω can be found by integrating (D)ωD2N1(Dθ)DdθdD over the line of sight. Therefore, N2 (θ)ωdθ = ω Z Dmax Dmin A change of variables Dθ = x results in 1 x3 (cid:18) x θ4 Z θDmax θ (cid:19) N1 (x)dx θDmin Assuming (x) = constant, differentiation gives 1 Dmax (cid:16)N2 (θ)θ4(cid:17)′ = θ3D3 maxN1 (θDmax) D3(D)N1 (Dθ)dDdθ N2 (θ) = − (1) (2) (3) − θ3D3 minN1 (θDmin ) ℓmin (cid:17)−γ For power law N1 (ℓ) = N1(ℓmin ) (cid:16) ℓ , the first term is the most important if γ < 3, whereas if γ > 3, the second term dominates. The cases of greatest interest here have γ < 3. Whenever the second term is negligible and N1(ℓ) is a power-law distribution, N2 (θ) is also power-law with the same index. Similarly for Dmin = 0, N1 (θDmax) = 1 θ3D4 max (N2(θ)θ4 )′ (4) and for any other Dmin , the power-law distribution N1(l) entails a power-law distribution N2 (θ) with equal slope. Therefore the index of the size distribution is not affected by the differing distances of the clouds in the sample, and the index of the angular size distribution is the same as the index of the linear size distribution. An exception occurs for a delta function linear size distribution, i.e. when all clouds have the same size. In that case the – 6 – apparent angular size distribution varies as θ−4 (see Bhatt et al. 1984). In what follows, we therefore identify N2(θ) with the “real” distribution of sizes, with the understanding that clustering of clouds and gradients in the number density of clouds with distance could alter this identification. Obviously, if the distance to a cloud complex is much greater than the extention of the complex, statistics of the “real” size distribution and the “apparent”angular size distribution coinside. 3. Occlusion effect N2 (θ) is the pro jected apparent angular size distribution of clouds when occlusion is ignored; i.e. it is the angular size distribution corresponding to the “real” linear size distribution. If occlusion is “switched on,” some of smaller clouds are hidden behind (or in front) of bigger ones. Let N3 (θ) be the distribution of pro jections in the presence of occlusion. Then πN3(θ)θ2ωdθ (5) is the angular area covered by cloud pro jections with sizes within the range θ, θ + dθ. The part of the sky not covered by cloud pro jections with angular sizes greater than θ is π A Z θu θ where A is the angular area covered by the survey and θu is the upper size limit for the sample. Therefore the number of cloud pro jections of angular size θ that are not occluded by larger clouds is N3 (x)x2dx 1 − (6) N2 (θ)ωdθ 1 − N3(x)x2dx! π A Z θu θ Since this is the number of clouds that is seen, equating this to N3(θ)ωdθ gives N3(x)x2dx! N3 (θ) = N2 (θ) 1 − π A Z θu θ The real size distribution N2(θ) can therefore be derived from the apparent (occluded size distribution N3(θ) from (7) (8) N3(θ) A R θu 1 − π θ N3 (x)x2dx The second term in the denominator is just the fraction of the survey area A covered by clouds with sizes greater that θ. The largest value this fraction can have occurs at θ = θℓ , N2(θ) = (9) – 7 – the minimum size detected in the survey, for which the second term is the total area filling factor of clouds detected in the survey (< 1). It is also possible to derive the observed distribution N3 (θ) that would result from a given real distribution N2 (θ), as shown in the Appendix. However, that formulation is not as useful for the purposes of the present paper because the solution involves the unknown properties of the real distribution. To illustrate the properties of the N2 − N3 relation, assume that the observed occluded distribution is a power law, N3(θ) = c3θ−γ3 . Then N2(θ) = c3θ−γ3 c3 (3−γ3 ) (θ−r3+3 u 1 − π A − θ−γ3+3) (10) f3,tot = (11) N3(θ)πθ2dθ = The total areal filling fraction is 1 πc3 A Z θu (cid:17) . A(3 − γ3) (cid:16)θ−γ3+3 u θℓ The second term is negligible for θℓ ≪ θu and γ3 < 3. So, from eqs. (10) and (11), we see that for θ significantly smaller than θu , N2 (θ) = N3(θ)/(1 − f3,tot ); i.e. for small clouds the real number of clouds is larger than the observed number by a factor (1 − f3,tot ), but the power law index is unaffected. The probability of a small cloud to be hidden by a large cloud is independent of its size if its size is much smaller than θu because the areal filling is dominated by the largest clouds (if γ3 < 3). − θ−γ3+3 ℓ To see this more clearly, consider the local logarithmic slope of the real distribution at size θ (i.e. the exponent of a local power law fit at that size). From eq. (10) we obtain γ2(θ) = dℓnN2(θ) dℓnθ πc3 A = γ3 + θ−γ3+3 h1 − πc3 A(3−γ3 ) (cid:16)θ−γ3+3 u ≡ γ3 + ∆γ (θ) − θ−γ3+3(cid:17)i (12) The maximum value of the change in exponent ∆γ (θ) occurs for θ near θu , at which size ∆γ (θ) = πc3 θ−γ3+3 /A ≈ (3 − γ3)f3,tot (for θℓ ≪ θu and γ3 < 3). If f3,tot ≈ 0.5, as is u typical for dark cloud surveys (not selected according to opacity class or size), then the dark cloud power law γ3 ∼ 1.4 gives ∆γ ≈ 1.6f3,tot ∼ 0.8. While this is about the value needed to reconcile the extinction size distribution with the spectral line size distribution, it only occurs very close to θu . At smaller θ, say xθu (x < 1), ∆γ is reduced by a factor of x−γ3+3 ∼ x1.6 for the parameters chosen. So even for clouds half or a third of the size of the largest clouds, ∆γ is too small to account for the discrepancy, and for x = 0.1, ∆γ is essentially negligible. – 8 – The same considerations hold even if the observed distribution N3 (θ) is not a power law, as long as it is not locally too steep (γ > 3): the real size distribution tracks the observed distribution (although at larger amplitude) except for sizes close to θu , at which sizes the real distribution is steeper than the observed distribution. We would be tempted to conclude that occlusion cannot account for the discrepancy, except for the fact that the range in sizes in the observed surveys is actually quite small. For both types of surveys, the cloud masses are proportional to the square of some characteristic size times a column density, so the range in sizes, which is a directly observed datum, only corresponds to the square root of a given range in the masses (which is what is usually displayed). Since, for the published spectral line surveys of clumps within cloud complexes, power laws are only good fits over a limited mass range (limited by small numbers at the largest masses and resolution incompleteness and other effects at small masses), usually a factor of 10–100, the range in sizes is not very large. The range in sizes for a few early surveys is listed in Drapatz, and Zinnecker (1984). The range in sizes for the line surveys of Stutzki and Gusten (1990), Lada et al. (1991), Tatematsu et al. (1993), Williams et al. (1984) and Williams and Blitz (1995) is less than a factor of 10, although the range in mass used to derive the mass spectra is larger in some of the surveys. This suggests that the mass distributions derived from spectral line surveys will be very sensitive to the definition of, and systematic uncertainties in the measurement of, cloud sizes. For the extinction sample the range of sizes over which the power law size spectrum is applicable is less than a factor of about 10 in all cases, even for the full sample of the Lynds and Khavtassi surveys, and various selection effects come into play at smaller and larger masses (see Scalo 1985, § III.B.2. for a discussion). Thus we conclude that the discrepancy between size distributions derived from extinction surveys and spectral line surveys may be due to occlusion effects in the extinction surveys because the minimum size is not much smaller than the maximum size in both types of surveys, or because of different operational definitions of size in the two types of surveys. Actually these two possibilities are not independent because the size range is related to how clouds are defined. It is worth pointing out that in some of the spectral line surveys the noise level is so large that the surveys are really only observing the “tips of the mountain range” if the column density map is thought of as a 2-dimensional surface with height equal to column density. For example, in the Rosette data (Blitz and Stark 1986), the rms noise is only about a factor of 2 smaller than the average peak line temperature, so the cloud sizes may be severely affected. For the dark clouds, identification of the cloud boundary is usually much less affected by “noise” (in this case fluctuation in star densities), except for the lowest-opacity clouds. Thus even though the line surveys have the advantage of separating clouds in velocity space it is not clear that they give more realistic size and – 9 – mass spectra compared to extinction surveys. Evidence that the empirical cloud mass spectra are sensitive to selection effects comes from the following two examples. Clemens and Barvainis (1988) compiled a catalogue of isolated small dark cloud (“globules”) identified on POSS plates and compiled properties based on their CO observations. For clouds with mean size larger than 3.5 arcmin (smaller size clouds are probably affected by incompleteness), we can fit the frequency distribution of angular sizes, and hence linear sizes if the clouds are uniformly distributed in distance, by f (r) ∼ r−2 , which gives a power law mass spectrum with γ = −1.5 to -1.7 for p = −1 or 0. These clouds were selected to be small and isolated, so occlusion should not be important. Since this result agrees with the molecular line surveys, it suggests that the flatter size and mass spectra derived from general extinction surveys are products of occlusion effects, if selection effects are unimportant in the estimation of properties from CO. However the survey of 255 IRAS cloud cores by Wood, Myers, and Daugherty (1994), which derives sizes and masses based on IRAS 100 µm optical depth for clouds with AV >∼ 4 mag, yields a frequency distribution of areas f (A) ∼ A−0.54 , or f (r) ∼ r−0.08 , which is extremely flat compared to not only the molecular line surveys, but even extinction surveys. For constant column density, as Wood et al. find, p = −1, so f (m) ∼ m−0.54 , consistent with their directly determined (from individual areas and column densities) f (m) ∼ m−0.49 . The sizes and masses for the fits have ranges of well over 1000. Since all the cores are optically thin at 100 µm, occlusion cannot be a factor; a small core behind a larger core would be seen as a column density enhancement of about a factor of two, because all the cores in the sample apparently have about the same column density. This result suggests that all the surveys, whether based on extinction, molecular line, or IRAS, are affected by selection effects. 4. Velocity occlusion The same argument used above for purely spatial occlusion can be somewhat extended to include the effects of blending in velocity space for spectral line surveys. In this illustrative example we assume that each identified “cloud” or “clump” (for convenience we use the latter term in what follows) has an internal velocity dispersion ∆v (θ) which is strictly correlated with the size of the clump, as found in several surveys, at least for clumps in which self-gravity is important. In that case the fraction of the total survey volume of – 10 – the data cube AV (A = area of the survey in the plane of the sky, V = radial velocity extent of the survey) occupied by occluded clumps of size θ is 1 AV Z θu θ where Nv (θ) is the size distribution found in the (blended) survey. The real size distribution is then πθ2Nv (θ)∆v (θ)dθ fv (θ) = N2(θ) = Nv (θ) 1 − fv (θ) The maximum value of fv (θ) occurs at θℓ and is the total volume filling factor of observed clumps in the data cube. Since this number is small for the surveys we are aware of (see Fig. 7 in Williams and Blitz 1995), the effect of this type of occlusion (due to finite internal velocity dispersion of the clumps) on the derived size distribution must be negligible, at least for velocity resolutions much smaller than the minimum ∆v . However, this analysis does not account for the fact that clumps with similar centroid velocities may lie along the same line of sight. Taking this effect which probably dominates the blending in velocity space, into account would involve calculting the probability that, for a prescribed centroid velocity distribution, two clouds along a given line of sight have a centroid velocity difference smaller than the sum of the linewidths of the two clouds (which is a function of θ), a calculation which we postpone to a later publication. 5. Conclusions Our study has examined the effect of occlusion on extinction surveys. The predicted change in the shape of the frequency distribution of cloud sizes for extinction surveys compared to spectral line surveys is small, except very near the maximum cloud size. Thus the discrepancy between the empirical results for the two types of surveys probably cannot be attributed to occlusion in the extinction survey, if the size range of both types of survey is large. Howver an examination of the literature shows that many of the observed surveys employ a very limited range of sizes. In these cases the discrepancy might still be due to occlusion. On the other hand, some of the spectral line surveys do include clouds with a fairly large range of sizes (e.g. Brand and Wouterloot 1995), and these surveys do find size and mass spectra much steeper than the dark cloud results. Furthermore, the IRAS cloud-core survey of Wood et al. (1995) gives size and mass spectra which are much flatter than both the extinciton and line survey results. This suggests that the inferred shapes of the size and mass spectra of clouds are affected by the manner in which clouds are defined and by the selection and noise effects inherent in both types of surveys. – 11 – This work was supported by NASA grant NAG52773. – 12 – APPENDIX Rather than solve for the real distribution function in terms of the observed (occluded) distribution) it is possible to derive the observed distribution N3(θ) that would result from a given real distribution N2 (θ). Differentiating eq. 9 with respect to θ gives 3(θ) = N3(θ) " πθ2 2 (θ) # N2(θ) N ′ 2(θ) N ′ N 2 A Integrating this equation, with a lower integration limit θℓ , gives exp ( π N2 (x)x2dx) A Z θ θℓ We can obtain N3 (θℓ )/N2(θℓ ) by imposing the condition that the largest cloud in the sample cannot suffer any occlusion, i.e. by substituting N3(θu ) = N2(θu ) at θ = θu in eq. A2. This condition results in N2 (θ) N2 (θℓ ) N3 (θ) N3 (θℓ ) (2) (1) + = (3) N3(θℓ ) N2(θℓ ) = exp ( π N2 (x)x2dx) = exp(−Atot /A), A Z θu θℓ where Atot is now the total area covered by all clouds in the unoccluded (real) distribution, and may be greater than the survey area A. Dividing the integral from θℓ to θu into parts from θℓ to θ and from θ to θu and substituting into eq. A2 gives N2(x)x2dx) = N2 (θ) exp[−A(> θ)/A], N3(θ) = N2(θ) exp (− π A Z θu θ where A(> θ) is the area covered by clouds with sizes greater than θ in the unoccluded distribution and may xxx by greater than A. For a power law N2(θ) = c2 θ−γ2 we find N3(θ) = N2 (θ) exp ( − θ−γ2+3)) . The local logarithmic slope of the predicted occluded distribution is then (assuming θℓ ≪ θu and γ2 < 3) θu !−γ2+3 A θ Atot dℓnN3 (θ) dℓnθ Once again we see that although the change in local logarithm slope may be large near θu , the effect becomes increasingly negligible for θ ≪ θu . πc2 (3 − γ2)A (θ−γ2+3 u γ3(θ) = = γ2 − (6) (4) (5) . However this formulation is not as useful as that given in the main text (which expressed N2 (θ) in terms of N3(θ)) because the total covering fraction of the real distribution is unknown, although it can be evaluated for a model which specifies the total number of clouds in the distribution (again unknown from observations). – 13 – REFERENCES Bhatt, H. C., Rowse, D. P., & Williams, J. P. 1984, MNRAS, 209, 69. Blitz, L. 1993, in Protostars & Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. L. Lunine (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), p. 125 Blitz, L. & Stark, A. A. 1986, ApJL, 300, L89 Brand, P. & Wouterloot 1995, AstrAp, in press Casoli, F., Combes, F., & Gerin, M. 1984, AstrAp, 133, 99 Clemens, D.P. & Barvainis, R. 1988, Ap. J. Suppl, 68, 257 Drapatz, S. & Zinnecker, H. 1984, MNRAS, 210, 11P Feitzinger, J. V. & Stuwe, J. A. 1986, ApJ, 305, 534 Khavtassi, D. Sh. 1960, Atlas of Galactic Dark Nebulae (Abastumani, USSR: Abastumani: Astrophys. Obs.) Lada, E. A., Bally, J., and Stark, A. A. 1991, Ap. J., 368, 432 Loren, R. B. 1989, ApJ, 338, 902 Lynds, B. T. 1962, ApJS, 7, 1 Pound, M. 1994, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Maryland Sanders, D. B., Scoville, N. Z., & Solomon, P. M. 1985, ApJ, 289, 373 Scalo, J. M. 1985, in Protostars & Planets II, ed. D. C. Black & M. S. Mathews (Univ. Ariz. Press), p. 201 ———. 1987, in Interstellar Processes, ed. D. J. Hollenbach & H. A. Thronson (Dordrecht- Reidel), p. 349 ———. 1990, in Physical Processes in Fragmentation & Star Formation, ed. R. Capuzzo- Dolcetta et al. (Doredrecht: Kluwer), p. 151 Stutzki, J. and Gusten, R. 1990, ApJ, 356, 513 Tatematsu, K., Umemoto, T., et al. 1993, Ap. J., 404, 643 – 14 – Williams, J. P. & Blitz, L. 1995, ApJ, in press Williams, J. P., de Geus, E. J., & Blitz, L. 1994, ApJ, 428, 693 Wood, D.O.S., Myers, P. C., and Daugherty, D. A. 1994, ApJS, 95, 457 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v3.0.
astro-ph/0211490	1	0211	2002-11-21T22:15:36	Ground level muons in coincidence with the solar flare of April 15, 2001	[ "astro-ph" ]	The counting rate of single muon tracks from the Project GRAND proportional wire chamber array is examined during the Ground Level Event (GLE) of April 15, 2001. The GLE was seen by neutron monitor stations shortly after the time of the solar X-ray flare. GRAND's single muon data are presented and compared with neutron monitor data from Climax, Newark, and Oulu. The single muon data have mean primary hadron energies higher than those of these neutron monitor stations and so contain information about higher energy hadrons. For the single muon data for Project GRAND, the GLE is detected at a statistical significance of 6.1-sigma.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Ground level muons in coincidence with the solar flare of April 15, 2001. J. Poirier and C. D'Andrea Center for Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 USA. The counting rate of single muon tracks from the Project GRAND proportional wire chamber array is examined during the Ground Level Event (GLE) of April 15, 2001. The GLE was seen by neutron monitor stations shortly after the time of the solar X-ray flare. GRAND's single muon data are presented and compared with neutron monitor data from Climax, Newark, and Oulu. The single muon data have mean primary hadron energies higher than those of these neutron monitor stations and so contain information about higher energy hadrons. For the single muon data for Project GRAND, the GLE is detected at a statistical significance of 6.1σ. 2 0 0 2 v o N 1 2 1 v 0 9 4 1 1 2 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a I. INTRODUCTION On April 15, 2001 the IPS Radio and Space Services website reported an X14 solar flare with a maximum X-ray intensity at 13.83 UT (8.83 hours EST or local time) [IPS Space Services, 2001]. The flare originated on the sun at coordinates S20 W85 [NOAA Space Environment Center Website, 2001] and had an X-ray intensity of 14 × 10−4 W/m2 at one AU from the sun. Flares of this high intensity are rare. During the period from 1976 - 1998, only sixteen flares of magnitude X10 or greater were reported. Observations on some of these high energy flares are given in [Bieber et al., 2002], [Falcone, 1999] and [Swinson and Shea, 1990]. Data from the Project GRAND proportional wire chamber array are examined for a signal during the time of the Ground Level Event (GLE) from this flare. During the peak time of the flare, the sun was at an elevation angle of 35◦ above GRAND's local horizontal plane and an azimuth of 110◦ from north. Even though the sun is near the minimum detectable elevation angle for GRAND, the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) and the magnetic field of the earth alter the direction of the protons from the sun. Charged particles from the sun follow a spiral path about the IMF (which itself curves in an Archimedes spiral about the sun) and are additionally deflected on entering the earth's magnetic field. Therefore the GLE associated with a particular X-ray flare should occur at a slightly later time than the X-ray event (due to the longer path length) and at a different angle than the sun, thus providing better detector acceptance even though a direct line to the sun is at a low elevation angle (see also [Munakata et al., 2001]). GRAND detects ground level muons originating from hadronic primaries with energies above the characteristic energy of neutron monitors. The value of this characteristic energy depends upon the spectral index of the proton flux from the sun during this GLE. The energy response function of Project GRAND is discussed in more detail in Section 5. Typically, surface muon telescopes are sensitive to proton primary energies above about 4 GeV [Shea and Smart, 2002]. II. EXPERIMENTAL ARRAY Project GRAND is an array of 64 proportional wire stations located at 41.7◦ N and 86.2◦ W at an altitude of 220 m above sea level. Each station contains four pairs of orthogonal proportional wire chamber planes; each plane of the pair has 80 wire cells 14 mm wide by 19 mm high. Each pair of planes is positioned 200 mm vertically above its neighbor. This geometrical arrangement allows for the direction of a muon track to be measured to within 0.26◦, on average, in each of two projected angles: Θxz and Θyz. The angle Θxz is measured in the xz-plane from the zenith (z) toward the east (x), Θyz is measured in the yz-plane from the zenith toward the north (y). A 50 mm thick steel plate is located above the bottom pair of PWC planes. The steel plate, in conjunction with the PWC pair of planes underneath, enables secondary muon tracks to be distinguished from those of electrons or hadrons. Each station has a total active area of 1.29 m2; the array currently collects data at a rate of ∼ 2400 muons per second. These data are read from the 64 stations in parallel to a central data acquisition system in 70 microseconds. Eight computer nodes are used, each receiving an event (data from all 64 stations) in sequence. The node's task is to search the 80 wires in each of 512 proportional wire planes and record the wire numbers in the eight planes of a station which had one and only one hit in each plane of that station. The eight computer nodes operating in sequence are able to conduct this search with little overall deadtime. Once a particular node has accumulated data on 900 muons in its buffer memory, the entire buffer is written to magnetic tape as a single record. Upon later off-line analysis, 96% of this recorded data turn out to fit straight tracks. A radio signal from WWVB in Boulder, Colorado provides time information with millisecond precision. This signal is used to determine the start time for the first and the last 2 muon event in each record. These times are then recorded along with the muon data for that record on magnetic tape. Additional details on the Project GRAND detector are available on GRAND's webpage [Project GRAND, 2001]. Other muon detectors are described, for example, in [Manakata et al., 2001] and [Duldig, 2000]. III. DATA ANALYSIS Project GRAND recorded a continuous data file on magnetic tape containing information from April 14, 2001 at 8:40 UT through April 16 at 21:30 UT, providing background information before and after the flare time. The counting rate from 14.5 hours to 24.5 hours UT was examined in 0.1 hour bins. The data file is segmented into records, each containing information on 900 muons. In order to find the time of a particular muon, the end time of the current record is compared to the end time of the previous record from that computer node; the times for each of the 900 muons is interpolated evenly within that interval. This interpolation of time should be quite adequate since the average length of a record was 3.6 seconds and thus the 0.1 hour bin size for the data is 90,000 times longer than the average time between muons. A station can turn on or off, either deliberately for miscellaneous repairs (which were not always recorded), or due to problems like, for example, high humidity coupled with a malfunctioning dehumidifier in a station. Deviations (r.m.s.) from average counting rate were measured individually for each station of the array. In order to prevent spurious individual station variations from giving a possible signal in the sum-of-all-stations, one-third of the stations with the highest individual r.m.s. deviations were eliminated from consideration leaving 39 stations (an extremely severe cut to ensure with great confidence that erratic station behavior could not cause a false signal). GRAND's counting rate above background is shown as a function of time in Figure 1 (lower points with error bars) with the data binned in 0.1 hour intervals. The six bins of time from 14.0 to 14.6 hours UT were used as a signal time and background bins from 9.5 to 19.5 hours UT (minus the signal time) were used. Since it is known that the muon rate depends slightly on the time of day [Poirier and D'Andrea, 2001a] (due to small solar effects in air pressure, temperature, and in the IMF), the counting rate for the background time period was fit to a curve of the form A(1 + Bt + Ct2) with A = 496000, B = 0.00101 and C = 0.000241 where t is time measured from 14.3 hours UT. The smallness of the B and C coefficients compared to one is a measure of the flatness of the muon counting rate during this time interval. The data as percentage above background are shown in Figure 1 with error bars. For comparison, the data from neutron monitors at Newark for this GLE [ J. Clem and R. Pyle, 2001] and Oulu [Oulu Neutron Monitor, 2001] are also shown. The Climax neutron monitor data [C. Lopate, 2001] are almost indistinguishable from that of Newark for this GLE and, for clarity, are not shown. GRAND's muon data rate, although sensitive to the atmospheric pressure, has not been corrected for changes in pressure. However, the pressure was recorded every half hour and found to be constant for the entire interval of time analyzed to within ±0.15%. Thus, the pressure is unlikely to be a factor in the analysis. Indeed, during the time of the flare the pressure actually rose slightly which would, if anything, depress the counting rate slightly during the time of the GLE. Thus, pressure variations could not be a cause of the excess counting rate observed from 14.0 to 14.6 hours UT. The muon counting rate for April 14 and April 16 (the preceding and the next day from the signal) are shown in Figure 2 as well as the data containing the signal on April 15. The background curve fit to the April 15 data is also included. It is seen that the background from the day before and the day after are similar to the background curve for April 15; also, the average of four years of data show a similar shape. The zero of muon counting rate is suppressed in order to better show these small deviations from an almost constant rate. The amount of signal above background was determined by the excess of the six signal bins above the fitted background curve. The signal in these six bins yields 10,708 counts above background with an error of 1762; this error includes the error on the background fit (A) and uses the r.m.s. deviation of the background about the fitted curve as an estimator for the rms error of the data in the signal region. This yields a Ground Level Event signal with a significance of 6.1σ (where σ is the error on the signal). Each of the 39 stations has an active area of 1.29 m2; correcting for those stations which were not 100% efficient yields a total effective area of 42 m2 for this analysis. The excess counting rate was 255 muons/m2 or 0.36% of the background muon counting rate during the 0.6-hour signal interval. A. Can GRAND see gamma ray or neutron primaries from this GLE? To determine if GRAND detects secondary muons from gamma ray [Poirier et al., 2001] or neutron primaries which originate from the sun (rather than the protons studied above), the muon rate was analyzed inside a 12◦ by 12◦ square e g a t n e c r e P 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 3 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5 15.5 16.5 17.5 18.5 19.5 Time (UT) FIG. 1: Percentage counting rate increase above background versus time on April 15. Bottom points (circles) with error bars are from GRAND with %-scale on the right; background is the curve in Fig. 2. Middle points (squares) are from Newark Neutron Monitor (left scale). Top points (triangles) are from Oulu Neutron Monitor (left scale). The arrow denotes the onset of the X-ray signal on the sun (at 13.83 hours UT [IPS Space Services, 2001]). 506000 504000 502000 500000 s t n u o C 498000 496000 494000 492000 490000 488000 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5 15.5 16.5 17.5 18.5 19.5 Time (UT) FIG. 2: Single muon counting rates in 0.1 hour bins versus time with suppressed zero to emphasize the small anisotropies. Bottom points (squares) are April 14. Middle points (circles) are April 15 with background curve fit and correspond to the numbers on the left. Top points (triangles) are April 16. The April 14 and 16 data are offset for clarity. Note that the small hourly background variations in time (±0.6%) are consistent over this three-day period. angular window centered on the sun. During the signal time from 14.0 to 14.6 hours UT, 368 counts were measured compared to an average of 376 background counts for the 0.6 hour interval of time as obtained during 9.5 to 19.5 hours UT (minus the signal time). The low counting rate in this angular window is caused by the sun's low elevation angle at that time. A negative signal of -- 8 counts from background is observed inside this 12◦ by 12◦ window, or -- 0.4 σ if compared to the error on the signal. Thus there is no evidence for direct gamma rays or neutrons from the sun; as well, they cannot be the cause of the 6.1 σ excess obtained in the data with no angular cuts. IV. ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION 4 The sky was divided into sixteen angular regions each with approximately equal counting rates in order to obtain some information about the angular characteristics of the signal [Poirier and D'Andrea, 2001b]. Each individual region of the sky was examined for the significance of a possible GLE signal. The significance of the GLE signal (in terms of sigma) for each of the 16 windows is shown in Table 1. For these 16 calculations, the background was individually fit to the same quadratic form as before with coefficients A, B, and C; however, due to the reduced amount of data in a region (∼1/16th of the entire angular region), the coefficients B and C were fixed at the value obtained for the whole sky and only the A parameter was varied in the fit to estimate the background under the signal region for each of the 16 angular regions. The angular information presented in Table 1 could be used in later analyses in an overall fit of this GLE using data from other muon detectors and neutron monitor stations around the world to obtain the mean arrival direction, pitch angle distribution, and spectral index. TABLE I: The significance (in terms of sigma) of the GLE signal for each region of the sky from 14.0 to 14.6 UT above the background measured from 9.5 to 19.5 UT. Θxz is measured from the zenith toward the east; Θyz is measured from the zenith toward the north. Local zenith is at the center of the table; to the right is east, to the top is north. Θyz Θxz ≤ -- 13◦ -- 13 to 0 0 to 13 ≥13◦ 0.5 1.7 0.9 -- 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.4 -- 0.8 0.4 2.5 2.3 -- 0.1 0.6 3.7 3.3 -- 0.1 ≥13◦ 0 to 13 -- 13 to 0 ≤ -- 13◦ An overall fit for each hemisphere (in a local horizon coordinate system) gives a signal strength of 4.8 σ for the northern and 1.9 σ for the southern hemisphere, while a signal strength of 3.7 σ is obtained for the eastern and 3.4 σ for the western hemisphere. These results show a definite preference for the northern hemisphere compared to the southern and only a slight preference for the eastern hemishpere over the western. The mean location of the sun at GRAND during the time of the GLE was θ xz = +53◦ (eastward) and θ yz = -- 26◦ (southward). V. PRIMARY ENERGY SENSITIVITY The response function of GRAND as a function of energy for primary protons yielding muons which reach detection level is calculated by using the Monte Carlo program FLUKA [Fass´o et al., 2000]. The atmosphere in these simulations is approximated by 50 layers of air beginning 80 km above sea level. The calculation is similar to that reported in [Poirier et al., 2001] except that the primary particles were changed from the gamma rays of that reference to primary protons for this calculation. Each primary proton is incident on the top of the atmosphere at zero degrees from zenith angle (as well as three non-zero angles for the 3, 10, and 30 GeV energies) and all non-hadronic secondaries are followed until they are below the threshold energy to produce pions or the charged tracks reach ground level. The calculation is done for a series of fixed proton primary energies for energies from 1 GeV to 1 TeV. A summary of the results of these calculations is contained in Table 2 for proton primaries incident at the top of the atmosphere at 0◦ from zenith. Figure 3 is a plot of this response function. Protons incident at 0◦ from zenith are shown by a dashed line. Incident angles of 17◦, 34◦, and 51◦ from zenith (solid lines) show GRAND has progressively smaller responses to angles which deviate from normal incidence. The deviation is fractionally larger at the lowest energy (3 GeV) plotted. L. Miroshnichenko [Miroshnichenko, 2002 preliminary] has calculated a preliminary fit to monitor stations at Ap- atity, Moscow (IZMIRAN), Rome, and Athens to obtain the integral flux of protons from this GLE versus the energy of the protons from 1 to 10 GeV. These values are plotted in Figure 4 as square points. The circular points below 0.1 GeV are proton fluxes obtained by the GOES satellite [GOES Website, 2001].. To obtain the overall differential response expected of GRAND for this GLE, the response function for GRAND (at 0◦ in Table 2) is plotted in Figure 4 as a dashed line (the numbers on the ordinate are the same with units of muons at detection level per proton of that primary energy). This response function is then folded with the flux of primary protons in each energy interval to obtain the differential energy response of GRAND for this GLE (shown as diamond points below 10 GeV). At energies ≥ 10 GeV, the proton intensity (shown by solid curves) was approximated using a 5 ) n o t o r p ( N / ) n o u m N ( 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 0.000001 0.0000001 1 10 100 1000 10000 Energy (GeV) FIG. 3: GRAND's response as a function of energy. The dashed line is the number of muons at detection level per incident proton primary. The highest solid line is for protons incident at 17◦ from zenith, the middle line is for protons at 34◦, and the bottom line is protons at 51◦. TABLE II: The results of the Monte Carlo calculation with the FLUKA code for the number of primary protons (N energy E different discrete primary proton kinetic energies. p incident normally at the top of the atmosphere yielding the number of muons (N p) of kinetic µ) which reach ground level for E p (GeV) N p N µ 1 3 10 30 100 300 1000 36.0 × 106 27 2.00 × 106 664 0.75 × 106 38511 0.40 × 106 208928 0.10 × 106 256847 0.10 × 106 738561 0.040 × 106 825910 p µ/N R = N 7.5 × 10−7 3.32 × 10−4 0.0513 0.522 2.57 7.39 20.6 power law spectrum with differential spectral indices of -- 8 (upper curve) and -- 10 (lower curve) which are normalized to the point at 9 GeV. . A. Asymptotic Direction of Observation versus Rigidity For rigidities (momentum per charge) in the GV range (kinetic energies in the GeV range), the primaries suffer deflections in the earth's magnetic field. In order to place GRAND's data for this GLE in the perspective of other muon stations and neutron monitors, it is of interest to know the direction of a proton primary before entering the earth's magnetic field (asymptotic direction) in order to arrive at vertical incidence 20 km above Project GRAND. This asymptotic direction depends on the rigidity of the primary as well as the location of the detector on the surface of the earth. We are indebted to Margaret Shea and Don Smart for performing this calculation [Shea and Smart, 2002], summarized in Figure 5, which shows the asymptotic direction of an antiproton starting at 20 km above sea level at the geographical location of GRAND (41.7◦ N and 86.2◦ W) and integrating the trajectories of various rigidities outward through a model of the earth's magnetic field to find their direction after exiting this field. The coordinate system for the asymptotic directions can be visualized as the intersection of this antiproton's trajectory on a huge sphere of the earth's coordinates with a radius much larger than the earth's magnetosphere. This is then the direction of a proton traveling toward the earth in the geomagnetic field which would reach an altitude of 20 km height above GRAND at 0◦ relative to its local zenith. The model of the earth's magnetic field which was used is the International Geomagnetic Reference Field, Epoch 1995 (I95). This is a quiescent field model and does not take into account magnetospheric perturbations (the K index during the GLE was 4). The individual asymptotic directions change with time because of the magnetospheric p 6 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 1E-05 1E-06 1E-07 1E-08 1E-09 1E-10 0.01 0.1 10 Primary Proton Kinetic Energy (GeV) 1 100 FIG. 4: The circular points represent integral proton intensity data from the GOES satellite [GOES Website, 2001] in units of particles cm−2s−1sr−1, while the square points are integral proton intensities from neutron monitor data compiled by Leonty Miroshnichenko [Miroshnichenko, 2002 preliminary] in the same units with an estimated factor of two error. The dashed line shows the R-values from Table 2 versus the primary proton kinetic energy calculated with FLUKA (in units of muons per primary proton). The diamond points from 1.5 to 9 GeV represent the fold of proton intensity with R-values to obtain the expected muon differential intensity at ground level for each interval (in units of particles cm−2s−1sr−1GeV −1. At energies greater than 10 GeV, the spectrum has been approximated with differential spectral indices of -- 8 (upper solid curve) and -- 10 (lower solid curve) normalized to the 9 GeV point. configuration. However, for rigidity values above about 2 to 2.5 GV, the changes are slight. Of greater importance would be changes related to the secular variation of the geomagnetic field which, for some areas of the world, can greatly alter the asymptotic directions close to cutoff values. Also during major geomagnetic disturbances the asymptotic directions can be changed considerably since the cutoff rigidity can be considerably lowered. However, for the Easter Sunday GLE and for GRAND, the values calculated should be adequate for almost any analysis of muon response [Shea and Smart, 2002]. GRAND 20 GV ) s e e r g e d ( e d u t i t a L 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 6 GV 3 GV 5 GV 4GV 3.5 GV -90 -75 -60 -30 -45 -15 Longitude (degrees) 0 15 30 FIG. 5: Asymptotic directions as a function of particle rigidities for GRAND [Shea and Smart, 2002]. Data on the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) is shown in figure 6 [GOES website, 2002]. The magnitude of the IMF is shown as circular points. The components in GSE coordinates are by squares (x, from the earth to the Sun along the ecliptic), triangles (y, perpendicular to x in the ecliptic plane), and diamonds (z, in the direction of the north ecliptic pole). While the magnitude of the IMF remains fairly constant, the direction of the magnetic field is changing over the period of this GLE. 7 ) T n ( t h g n e r t S d e F l i 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 14 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 Time (UT) FIG. 6: Interplanetary Magnetic Field during the April 15, 2001 GLE [GOES Website, 2002]. The circular points represent the magnitude of the magnetic field. The squares, triangles, and diamonds represent the x,y, and z components of the magnetic field in the GSE coordinate system. VI. OTHER OBSERVATIONS Data from the Climax, Newark, and Oulu Neutron Monitor Stations are compared for this time interval on April 15 [Lopate, Clem and Pyle, and Oulu Neutron Monitor Website, 2001]. In Figure 1, the data for Climax are very close to that of Newark and for clarity are not shown. The energy thresholds for the Climax, Newark, and Oulu neutron monitor stations are influenced by their vertical geomagnetic cutoff rigidity at 3.0, 2.1, and 0.8 GV respectively [University of Chicago Neutron Monitor Website, 2001] and overburden of air; their corresponding heights above sea level are 3400, 50, and 15 m. The corresponding numbers for GRAND are a geomagnetic cutoff rigidity of 1.9 GV and a height of 220 m above sea level. However, the primary energy for GRAND is influenced by the different mechanisms which produce muons (rather than neutrons) at detection level. While looking at single muon tracks at ground level, GRAND's primary proton energy is approximately 4 GeV (see Figure 4 and [Shea and Smart, 2002]) for the spectral shape of this GLE. When binned in six-minute intervals, the Newark signal has an onset time at 14.21 hours, the Climax signal at 14.16 hours, and Oulu at 14.27 hours (where the "onset" is the time of the half-height of the signal as measured from its rise above background to the highest measured data point of the GLE). A similar calculation for the onset time for GRAND is 14.09 hours. The width (full width at half-of-maximum above background) of the Climax, Newark, and Oulu peaks are 1.27, 1.24, and 1.61 hours in contrast to GRAND's value of 0.48 hour. Thus the GRAND peak is: a) shorter in duration (typically, higher energies have a shorter duration than lower energies as is seen in satellite data for protons at lower energies [GOES Website, 2002]), b) the onset is ∼0.1 hour earlier (the earlier time might be expected on the basis of higher primary energies compared to the neutron monitors [Clem and Dorman, 2000] with faster protons traveling at smaller pitch angles yielding shorter path lengths, and c) smaller in amplitude due to GRAND's sensitivity to higher primary energies. Project GRAND sees a ground level signal with a significance of 6.1 σ when examining the secondary muon counting rate at ground level between 14.0 and 14.6 hours UT on April 15, 2001. This signal is obtained with no restrictions on VII. CONCLUSIONS the angle of the muons. This is consistent with protons originating at the surface of the sun and accelerated during the time of the X14 X-ray flare. 8 A slightly negative signal ( -- 0.4 σ) is obtained if a small region of the sky (±5◦ in θ yz) near the angle of the sun's position is examined. Thus, neither gamma ray nor neutron primaries are the cause of the 6.1σ signal found in the data with no angular cuts. xz and in θ GRAND's GLE detection occurs slightly earlier than Climax, Newark, or Oulu neutron monitor signals which might be expected from the slightly higher primary energies detected by GRAND (above about 4 GeV) compared to the neutron monitors (the vertical geomagnetic cutoff energies for the Climax, Newark, and Oulu neutron monitor stations are 3, 2, and 0.8 GeV respectively). Earlier times would be consistent with smaller pitch angles relative to the IMF (and thus a shorter flight path) for the higher energies as well as the increased velocity. The fact that GRAND's GLE signal is not as pronounced as those from the neutron monitors indicates that there are fewer particles at GRAND's higher energies. The mean energy of primary protons which produces the detected muons depends somewhat upon the spectral index of this GLE in the 4 GeV region. In the future, combined analyses of world-wide neutron monitor stations and muon telescopes are anticipated to yield more detailed information on this GLE. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Monica Dunford, Jon Vermedahl, and Mari´e L´opez del Puerto for their participation in the data analyses; Kent Doggett (and the ACE science team); the GOES science team; and Stefan Roesler and Alberto Fasso for their assistance with the Monte Carlo simulations. Thanks to Leonty Miroshnichenko for preliminary intensity calculations. We also thank Margaret Shea and Don Smart for calculations of GRAND's asymptotic direction as a function of rigidity; John Clem and Roger Pyle (and Bartol), Cliff Lopate (and Climax), and the Oulu Neutron Monitor for the use of their data; Ted Bowen for suggestions on improving the text; and Jule Poirier for proofreading. The Newark neutron monitor is operated by the Bartol Research Institute Neutron Monitor Program and is funded by National Science Foundation Grant ATM-0000315. The Climax Neutron Monitor is operated by The University of Chicago and is funded through National Science Foundation Grant ATM-9912341. Project GRAND is funded through the University of Notre Dame and private grants. [1] Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) Homepage, World Wide Web: http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE. [2] J. Bieber et al., Energetic Particle Observations During the 2000 July 14 Solar Event, Astrophysical Journal, 622, March 1, 2002. [3] M. Duldig, Muon Observations, Space Science Reviews, p. 207-226, January, 2000. [4] J. Clem and L. Dorman, Neutron Monitor Response Functions (and references therein), Space Science Reviews, 93, 335, 2000. [5] J. Clem and R. Pyle, Private Communication, 2001. World Wide Web: http://www.bartol.udel.edu/∼neutronm. [6] A. Falcone, J. Ryan, Milagro as a Solar Observatory, Astroparticle Physics, 283, 1999. [7] A. Fass`o, A. Ferrari, P.R. Sala, Electron-photon transport in FLUKA: Status, Proceedings of the Monte Carlo 2000 Conference, Lisbon, 159, 2000. [8] A. Fass`o et al., FLUKA: Status and Prospective for Hadronic Applications, ibid, 955, 2000. [9] GOES Website. World Wide Web: http://rsd.gsfc.nasa.gov/goes [10] GRAND's Homepage. World Wide Web: http://www.nd.edu/∼grand [11] IPS Radio and Space Services Website, 2001. World Wide Web: http://www.ips.gov.au. [12] C. Lopate, Private Communication, 2001. [13] L. Miroshnichenko, Preliminary Results from Pivate Communication, 2002. [14] L. Miroshnichenko, Solar Cosmic Rays, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. [15] K. Munakata, A Prototype Muon Detector Network Covering a Full Range of Cosmic Ray Pitch An- the 27th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Hamburg, 3494, 2001. World Wide Web: gles, Proceedings of http://www.copernicus.org/icrc/programme.htm. [16] NOAA Space Environment Center Website, 2001. World Wide Web: http://www.sec.noaa.gov. [17] Oulu Neutron Monitor Website, 2001. World Wide Web: http://spaceweb.oulu.fi/projects/crs. [18] J. Poirier and C. D'Andrea, Variation of Muon Counts versus Solar Time, Proceedings of the 27th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Hamburg, 3934, 2001a. World Wide Web: http://www.copernicus.org/icrc/programme.htm. [19] J. Poirier and C. D'Andrea, A Measurement of Secondary Muon Angular Distributions, Proceedings of the 27th Interna- tional Cosmic Ray Conference, Hamburg, 3923, 2001b. World Wide Web: http://www.copernicus.org/icrc/programme.htm. [20] J. Poirier, S. Roesler, and A. Fass`o, Distributions of Secondary Muons at Sea Level from Cosmic Gamma Rays Below 10 TeV, astro-ph/0103030, 2001. [21] J. M. Ryan and the MILAGRO Collaboration, High Energy Solar Particles in the 6 November 1997 Ground Level the 27th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Hamburg, 3367, 2001. World Wide Web: Event, Proceedings of http://www.copernicus.org/icrc/programme.htm. [22] M. Shea and D. Smart. Private Communication, 2002. [23] D.B. Swinson and M.A. Shea, The September 29, 1989 Ground Level Event Observed at High Rigidity, Geophysical Research Letters, 8, 1073, 1990. [24] University of Chicago Neutron Monitor Website, 2001. World Wide Web: http://ulysses.uchicago.edu/NeutronMonitor/neutron mon.html. [25] E. V. Vashenyuk, The Ground Level Enhancement of 14 July 2000: Explaining the difference between near-by neutron monitors at Apatity and Oulu, Proceedings of the 27th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Hamburg, 3383, 2001. 9
astro-ph/0702693	1	0702	2007-02-26T21:19:36	The present day mass function in the central region of the Arches cluster	[ "astro-ph" ]	We study the evolution of the mass function in young and dense star clusters by means of direct N-body simulations. Our main aim is to explain the recent observations of the relatively flat mass function observed near the centre of the Arches star cluster. In this region, the power law index of the mass function for stars more massive than about 5-6 solar mass, is larger than the Salpeter value by about unity; whereas further out, and for the lower mass stars, the mass function resembles the Salpeter distribution. We show that the peculiarities in the Arches mass function can be explained satisfactorily without primordial mass segregation. We draw two conclusions from our simulations: 1) The Arches initial mass function is consistent with a Salpeter slope down to ~1 solar mass, 2) The cluster is about half way towards core collapse. The cores of other star clusters with characteristics similar to those of the Arches are expected to show similar flattening in the mass functions for the high mass (>5 solar mass) stars.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 6 (2007) Printed 14 May 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) The present day mass function in the central region of the Arches cluster Simon Portegies Zwart,1,2⋆ Evghenii Gaburov,1,2⋆ Hui-Chen Chen1,2,3⋆ and M. Atakan Gurkan1⋆ 1 Astronomical Institute 'Anton Pannekoek' University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Section Computational Science, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 3 Graduate Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, No 300 Jhongda Rd. Jhongli City, Taiwan 14 May 2018 ABSTRACT We study the evolution of the mass function in young and dense star clusters by means of direct N -body simulations. Our main aim is to explain the recent observations of the relatively flat mass function observed near the centre of the Arches star cluster. In this region, the power law index of the mass function for stars more massive than about 5 -- 6 M⊙ is larger than the Salpeter value by about unity; whereas further out, and for the lower mass stars, the mass function resembles the Salpeter distribution. We show that the peculiarities in the Arches mass function can be explained satisfactorily without primordial mass segregation. We draw two conclusions from our simulations: 1) The Arches initial mass function is consistent with a Salpeter slope down to ∼ 1 M⊙, 2) The cluster is about half way towards core collapse. The cores of other star clusters with characteristics similar to those of the Arches are expected to show similar flattening in the mass functions for the high mass ( > ∼ 5 M⊙) stars. Key words: methods: N-body simulations -- open clusters and associations: individ- ual: Arches -- galaxies: star clusters 1 INTRODUCTION The mass function of a star cluster changes because of both stellar evolution and stellar dynamics. Stellar evolu- tion causes the turn-off mass to decrease as the most mas- sive stars evolve away from the main sequence, ascend the giant branch to ultimately shed their envelopes to turn into compact objects. Stellar evolution therefore has a character- istic effect on the mass function by truncating it at the high mass end. The dynamical evolution of a cluster has a more compli- cated effect on changes in the mass function. The dominant effect here is dynamical friction, which causes the most mas- sive stars to sink to the cluster centre on a time scale that is inversely proportional to the stellar mass, i.e. the most mas- sive stars tend to sink more quickly than relatively lighter stars. At the same time, stars less massive than the average mass tend to leave the inner regions. As a result of this mass segregation, the local stellar population becomes a function of the distance to the cluster centre. ⋆ E-mail: (EG); (MAG) [email protected] [email protected] (SPZ); [email protected] [email protected] (H-CC); Mass segregation, though mostly noticeable in the clus- ter's central regions, is a global phenomenon. A star cluster that is born with the same mass function across its radial coordinate will gradually grow a top-heavy mass function in its centre and a top-depleted mass function in its outskirts. Near the half mass radius, the mass function remains closest to the initial mass function (Vesperini & Heggie 1997). In this letter, we concentrate on the evolution of the stellar mass function in the inner part of young and dense star clusters, using N -body simulations. Our interest in this topic was initiated by the recent accurate measurements published by Stolte et al. (2005); Kim et al. (2006) in which the mass function in the inner ∼ 10" from the centre of the Arches star cluster was studied. These observations, es- pecially the latter, revealed that the mass function of near the centre of Arches cluster is a broken power law, with the turning point mp ∼ 5−6M⊙. We were able to reproduce this feature without invoking any special mechanism. Our sim- ulations allow us to draw conclusions on the history of the dynamical evolution of the Arches cluster. L2 Simon F. Portegies Zwart et al. 2 DYNAMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MASS FUNCTION 2.1 Parameters for the simulations As a cluster evolves, stars more massive than the mean mass hmi tend to sink to the cluster centre whereas lighter stars move outwards. For the most massive stars, the time scale for dynamical friction is proportional to two-body relaxation time, tr: tdf ∝ hmi m⋆ tr, (1) were m⋆ is the mass of the massive star, which segregates inwards. The value of the relaxation time at the cluster's half-mass radius, rh is given by (Spitzer 1987, eq. 2.63) tr = 0.138N h ln Λ (cid:18) r3 GM(cid:19)1/2 . (2) Here G is Newton's constant of gravity, M and N are the to- tal mass and the number of stars in the cluster and ln Λ is the Coulomb logarithm, for which we adopt ln Λ = ln(0.01N ) (Giersz & Heggie 1996). For the central relaxation time, we use trc = σ3 3D 4.88π G2 ln Λ nhmci2 , (3) where σ3D, n and hmci are the three-dimensional velocity dispersion, number density and average stellar mass at the cluster centre (Spitzer 1987, eq. 3.37). We follow the dynamical evolution of our mod- els by means of direct N -body simulations, which we carry out with the starlab software environment (Portegies Zwart et al. 2001). The calculations are per- formed on the GRAPE-6 special purpose computer (Makino et al. 1997; Makino 2001). Our numerical experiments are performed with N = 12288 and 24576 stars. For each N , we perform simulations starting with a full range of density profiles for which we chose King (1966) models with the dimensionless parameter W0 ranging from 3 to 12. The mass function in our simu- lations is described by a power-law, dN/dm = mx, where we adopt the Salpeter value for the index (x = −2.35), with masses ranging from 1 M⊙ to 100 M⊙. To validate our re- sults, we carried out additional simulations with N = 49152 as well as with a Salpeter mass function with 0.1 M⊙ as the lower limit. It will turn out that the presence of a tidal field has little effect on the results, but reducing the lower limit to the initial mass function to 0.1 M⊙ has a profound effect on the results, as we discuss below. For clarity we mainly focus on the models with 12288 and 24576 stars. With these parameters, the relaxation time at the virial ra- dius for the 12k models is about 360 N -body time units, whereas for the 24k models this is 625 N -body time units (see Heggie & Mathieu (1986)1). The close proximity of the Arches cluster to the Galac- tic centre (Cotera et al. 1992, 1996) would seemingly require the simulations to include tidal effects. And for understand- ing the dynamics in the cluster outskirts or the evaporation 1 For the definition of an N-body unit, or the summary at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural units. time scale the tidal field will prove crucial. For studying the evolution of the central region on the short time scale re- ported here, however, the tidal field has negligible effect. We support this statement by carrying out additional sim- ulations which include the tidal field, and those show no discernible effect. We therefore focus on the results of sim- ulations without a tidal field. This has the attractive side effect that it allows us to scale our results with respect to N . We also ignore the effects of stellar evolution. This ap- proximation is rectified as on the short lifetime of the cluster (2 ± 1 Myr) even the most massive stars remain on the main sequence, though some effect of the stellar mass loss at the top end of the mass function can be expected. For example, a 60 M⊙ zero-age main sequence star with solar metalicity loses about 3 M⊙ in its first ∼ 2.4 Myr (Lejeune & Schaerer 2001), which has a negligible effect on the slope of the mass function. 2.2 Dynamical evolution towards core collapse In our simulations we identify the moment of core collapse as soon as a persistent binary forms with a binding energy of at least 100 kT (where the energy scale kT is defined by the condition that the total stellar kinetic energy of the system, excluding internal binary motion, is 3 2 N kT). For a cluster with a mass function that is consistent with the observed mass function in young star clusters, core collapse occurs at a more or less constant fraction of the initial central relax- ation time tcc ∼ 0.2 ± 0.1trc (Portegies Zwart & McMillan 2002; Gurkan et al. 2004). In Fig. 1 we plot the moment of core collapse as a function of the initial concentration of the cluster. The slight dependence of tcc/trc on W0, as well as the offset between our results with those of Gurkan et al. (2004) is presumably mainly caused by their broader range of stellar masses (0.2 < m/M⊙ < 120) in the initial mass function, whereas here we adopt an initial mass function with 1 < m/M⊙ < 100. An additional effect is expected from the difference in the number of stars. The simulations of Gurkan et al. (2004) were carried out with 106. The sys- tematic difference between our results from simulations with 12k and 24k stars shows that this also affects the results sys- tematically. At this moment, however, we cannot quantify this effect. Dynamical friction causes the massive stars to segre- gate to the cluster centre making the mass function flat- ter at the higher end, in this region, until the formation of a hard binary. In Figure 2 we illustrate the evolution of the mass function between rcore and 2rcore. We show the mass function at birth (top curve, the Salpeter mass func- tion), halfway to core collapse and at core collapse (bottom curve). We denote the point around which the slope of the mass function changes by mp, and the power-law indices in higher and lower ends by xm<mp and xm>mp , respectively. The apparent decrease in the number of stars in the mass function presented in Figure 2 is the result of the cluster becoming more concentrated which causes the adopted an- nulus (rcore < r < 2rcore) to become narrower. The effect of flattening of the mass function is less pro- nounced further away from the cluster centre. This is illus- trated in Figure 3, where we present the evolution of xm>mp for the 24k simulations with W0 = 5 and for r = 0 to rcore (top curve), for r = rcore to 2rcore and for r = 2rcore to 3rcore The Arches Cluster Mass function L3 ) c r t / c c t ( g o l 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1 3 4 5 6 7 W0 8 9 10 11 p m > m x -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1 -1.2 -1.4 -1.6 -1.8 -2 -2.2 -2.4 -2.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 t/tcc Figure 1. The moment of core collapse (tcc) in units of the core- relaxation time (trc) as a function of W0. The dashed curve gives the results of our simulations with 12k stars and the solid curve with 24k. Since we performed only one simulation per set of initial conditions no error bars are presented. The bottom (dotted) line denote the results of Gurkan et al. (2004). Figure 3. The evolution of xm>mp for various radial bins in the 24k simulation with a W0 = 5 King model. The time is given in units of core collapse time tcc. The radial bins are 0 < r/rcore < 1 (upper solid curve), 1 < r/rcore < 2 (dotted curve), and 2 < r/rcore < 3 (lower solid curve). To guide the eye, we plotted straight lines through the simulation data. n g o l 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 log m Figure 2. The mass function of one of the simulations (N = 24k, W0 = 5) for an annulus 1 < r/rcore < 2, around the cluster centre. From top to bottom, the curves are at times t = 0, t ≃ 0.61tcc, and t ≃ 1.05tcc. The solid lines are least squares fits to the mass function with a broken power-law. (bottom curve). The values of mp, xm<mp and xm>mp are obtained by a three-point least squares fit to the mass func- tion in a predetermined annulus of the simulated date. Note that we relaxed the fitting procedure in the sense that the mass function is not required to be continuous. The point of stalling of the evolution of the mass function can be iden- tified by the moment of core collapse, regardless of the ini- tial concentration or the number of stars in the simulation. Therefore, we normalize the time axis in Figure 3 to that instant. p m > m x -1 -1.2 -1.4 -1.6 -1.8 -2 -2.2 -2.4 0 2 4 6 8 10 r/rcore Figure 4. The value of xm>mp as a function of distance form the cluster centre after core collapse. The solid curve gives the average value of xm>mp over the various simulations with 24k stars for W0 = 3, 4 up to W0 = 12, the dashed line gives the data for the simulations with N = 12k. The squares, bullets and triangles with error bars give the observed values taken from Figer et al. (1999), Stolte et al. (2005) and Kim et al. (2006), re- spectively (see Tab. 1). The lower thin dashed line gives the value of xm>mp for simulations with 24k particles with W0 = 9 and a lower limit to the initial mass function of 0.1 M⊙. 2.3 Post-collapse mass function After the formation of a hard binary, the mass function achieves a quasi steady state. The slope of the high-mass end of the mass function varies throughout the cluster. In in Figure 4 we show how the mass function for stars with m > mp after the moment of core collapse is a function of the distance to the cluster centre, being flatter closer in and resembling the initial mass function further out. Overplotted L4 Simon F. Portegies Zwart et al. n u S M p m / 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 r/rcore Figure 5. The value of mp after the point of core collapse, as a function of distance to the cluster centre for various of simula- tions. The circles connected with a thin solid line give the results for the simulations with 24k stars and with W0 = 5 averaged between the moment of core collapse and twice the core collapse time. The error bars indicate the variation of the value of mp over this time period. More concentrated initial models tend to have a slightly lower value of mp, which we illustrate by plotting the W0 = 9 simulation as the thick lower dotted line. The upper dotted line gives the results of the simulation with N = 12k and for W0 = 5. The thin dashed line at the bottom gives the value of mp for simulations with 24k particles with W0 = 9 and a lower limit to the initial mass function of 0.1 M⊙. are the observed values of the mass function exponent (see Tab. 1, see § 3). The results of our simulations with a tidal field are statistically identical to those with a tidal field. The simulations with a minimum mass to the initial mass func- tion of mmin = 0.1 M⊙ is plotted as the thin dashed curve in Fig. 4. For clarity we did not plot error bars for this figure, but the results with a lower limit of 0.1 M⊙ are inconsistent with the observed values. In Figure 5, we show the value of mp as a function of distance from the cluster centre for various simulations, past the moment of core collapse. It turns out that more concen- trated initial models tend to result in a slightly smaller value of mp whereas simulations with a smaller number of stars give rise to a higher value of mp. The behaviour of xm>mp is rather insensitive to the initial concentration of the cluster. It may be noted that the results of simulations with 0.1 M⊙as the lower limit of the mass function are not con- sistent with the observed values of xm>mp and mp. 3 MASS FUNCTION OF THE ARCHES CLUSTER At a projected distance of about 25 pc from Sgr A*, the Arches cluster (α = 17h45m50s, δ = −27◦49′28′′ in J2000), discovered by Cotera et al. (1992, 1996), is peculiar. The total cluster mass is about 2 · 104 M⊙ . The core radius of the cluster (defined as the radial distance from the cluster centre where the luminosity profile drops by a factor two) is rcore= 5".0 (Stolte et al. 2005), and corresponds to about 0.2 pc if we assume that the distance to the Galactic centre Table 1. Parameters for the observed mass function of the Arches cluster. The first two columns give the range over which the mass function is measured, in units of the cluster's core radius (rcore ≃ 0.20 pc). The third and fourth columns give the range in masses for which the exponent of the mass function (last column) is fitted. Column 5 gives the reference for the mass function expo- nents 1: Stolte et al. (2005), 2: Kim et al. (2006), 3: Figer et al. (1999), and the last column the measured value of x between mmin and mmax. rmin (rcore) 0 1 1 0 1 1 0.6 4 3 2.5 2 n g o l 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 rmax mmin mmax (M⊙) (M⊙) (rcore) ref x 1 2 2 2 1.8 1.8 1.8 8 12 6 16 6 6.3 1.3 6.3 2.8 60 16 60 60 50 50 125 32 1 −1.26 ± 0.07 1 −1.69 ± 0.08 1 −2.21 ± 0.09 1 −1.86 ± 0.02 2 −1.71 ± 0.15 2 −1.91 ± 0.08 3 3 ∼ −1.65 O(−2.35) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 log m Figure 6. The present day mass function of the Arches star cluster between 1 rcore and 1.8 rcore. The error bars are taken directly from Fig. 5 of Kim et al. (2006). The three thin lines are from Fig. 2 at zero age (top line), at t ≃ 0.61tcc (middle line) and at t ≃ 1.05tcc (bottom line). The thick dashed line is identical to the thin t ≃ 0.61tcc but then renormalized with -0.35 dex. This line produces a satisfactory fit to the observed mass function. is 8 kpc. The age of the cluster is 2 ± 1 Myr (Figer et al. 1999). Recently, Kim et al. (2006) observed the Arches cluster using Keck/NIRC2 laser guide star adaptive optics. Their observations covered the inner parts of the cluster and some control fields at a distance of about 2.4 pc (60") from the cluster centre. They subsequently constructed the luminos- ity and mass functions down to about 1.3 M⊙, in an annulus of 5" (about 1.0 rcore) to 9" (about 1.8 rcore) from the cluster centre. In Table 1 we give the various measurements of the mass function and the distance from the cluster centre in terms of the observed core radius. The data show that the slope in the mass function for stars more massive than ∼ 5 M⊙ flattens towards the cluster centre (see fig. 4). For lower mass stars, as well as for further out than ∼ 4 rcore it is closer to to the Salpeter mass func- tion. The observed mass function in the Arches is not a sim- ple power-law (Stolte et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2006). We argue that in the inner parts of the cluster, r < ∼ 4rcore, the mass function is best described by two power laws with the break around mp = 5 -- 6 M⊙. The mass function below this break (mp) resembles the initial mass function (xm<mp ≡ xIMF), and above mp it becomes flatter (xm>mp > xIMF). Further out than r ≃ 4 rcore the break disappears and the mass function becomes gradually better represented with the ini- tial mass function. 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We performed detailed simulations of the evolution of young and dense star clusters using direct N -body simulations, in order to constrain the observed mass function within about one parsec from the centre of the Arches cluster. The initial conditions of our simulations range over the full spectrum of King model density profiles. The mass function in the central region of the Arches cluster is peculiar as it appears to be split in two power- laws, one for the stars less massive than 5 -- 6 M⊙ and a much shallower slope for the more massive stars. The two power- laws fit the observed data between 5" and 9" is marginally better (χ2 ≃ 0.5) than a single power-law (χ2 ≃ 0.93). The simulations we perform to mimic the Arches cluster are able to reproduce this observed broken power-law mass function at the observed projected distance from the cluster centre (r = 0 -- 4 rcore). The best comparison between obser- vations and simulations is obtained if the cluster is about half way core collapse (t = 0.4 -- 0.6 tcc). Our simulations, however, are performed without stel- lar evolution and without including the effects of an external tidal potential. As a result, they are scale-free, and no spe- cific choices for the scalings to mass, size and therefore to time are obliged. However, the scale-free aspect of our sim- ulations hinders the direct comparison to some extend as the size scale (in parsec) and time scale (in Myr) are impor- tant for an unbiased comparison with the observed Arches cluster. In the comparison with the observations we adopt the same definition of the core radius by projecting the clus- ter and assigning luminosities of all stars in our simulations using zero-age main-sequence luminosities2. We ignore here the fact that very massive stars may become brighter in the 2±1 Myr lifetime of the cluster, but this only affects the most massive stars, whereas the measurements are dominated by stars in the mid-range of masses. The Arches cluster does not show any evidence for pri- mordial mass segregation as our simulations (which were initialized without primordial mass segregation) are able to satisfactorily reproduce the observed mass function over the 2 For comparison, we adopt the observers' definition of core ra- dius: the point where the surface brightness drops to half its central value. This is similar to but different from definitions used in theoretical works of (Spitzer 1987, eq. 1-34) and (Aarseth 2003, eq. 15-4). In starlab we adopt the method as discussed by Heggie, Trenti, & Hut (2006). The latter definition of the core radius systematically is about twice the observers' definition. The Arches Cluster Mass function L5 entire range of observed masses and distances from the clus- ter centre. Note also that the presence of primordial gas which failed to form stars does not seem to have affected the early cluster evolution, as the observed cluster structure at an age of 2 ± 1 Myr is satisfactory explained with the simulations, which do not include gas dynamics. The initial mass function of the Arches cluster is then consistent with a Salpeter slope between 1 M⊙ and 100 M⊙ without the need for a radial dependence. There seems to be no need for a large population of stars less massive than ∼ 1 M⊙. In fig. 4 we show the evolution of xm>mp for the an- nuli and distances from the cluster centre reported from our compilation from the literature in Tab. 1. The best match between the simulations and the observations is acquired for simulations between t = 0.4tcc and 0.6 tcc, i.e: we pre- dict that the cluster is about half way towards core collapse. We therefore conclude that the Arches cluster has not yet experienced core collapse but is currently in a pre collapse stage. In Tab. 1 we have quantified the slope to the low mass end of the mass function in 5" to 9" annulus of the Arches cluster as consistent with Salpeter, whereas the naive mea- surement in Fig. 5 of Kim et al. (2006) would results in xm<mp = −3.67 ± 0.14 (with mp = 5 M⊙), which is unusu- ally steep. If this slope would represent the intrinsic Arches initial mass function and we adopt a minimum mass of 1 M⊙ the observed ∼ 2600 stars more massive than ∼ 5 M⊙ in the Arches cluster would result in a total number of more than 2 × 105 stars, which is unrealistically high. From an obser- vational point of view there are good arguments that the low mass end of the mass function is over-estimated, as it is plagued by selection effects. One of these effects is the artificial correction of missing stars in a crowded field and the selection of the three control fields to compensate for the background population. In the Keck observations these control fields are within about 2.4 pc from the cluster cen- tre, which corresponds to ∼ 12 rcore. For a King model with > W0 ∼ 5.2 the control fields would then be located near the cluster tidal radius. And since the cluster is about half way towards core collapse it is conceivable that the density pro- > file is described with a King model with W0 ∼ 7, in which case the control field are part of the cluster halo. Due to mass segregation the cluster outskirts will be depleted of high mass stars and low mass stars will be over- represented (the opposite effect as we discussed for the core population). Correcting the mass function in the cluster core with a population taken from near the cluster halo will there- fore result in an enormous over correction towards the low mass stars, and consequentially result in a steepening of the 'corrected' mass function. One of the control fields (field B of Kim et al, 2006) is taken near the location where one expects the tidal tail of the cluster in the potential of the Galaxy to pass though. The tidal tail is, since it consists of the halo population, also likely to be dominated by low mass stars. Each of the effects discussed tend to steepen the lower- mass end of the mass function, though it is not trivial to quantize the effect without a much more detailed study. We however, argue that the initial mass function of the Arches cluster was probably consistent with Salpeter over the ob- served mass range. The observed break in the mass function around 5 -- 6 M⊙ and the consequential flattening of the mass Kim S. S., Figer D. F., Kudritzki R. P., Najarro F., 2006, ApJ, 653, L113 King, I. R. 1966, AJ, 71, 64 Lejeune T., Schaerer D., 2001, A&A, 366, 538 Makino, J. 2001, in S. Deiters, B. Fuchs, A. Just, R. Spurzem, R. Wielen (eds.), ASP Conf. Ser. 228: Dynamics of Star Clusters and the Milky Way, p. 87 Makino, J., Taiji, M., Ebisuzaki, T., Sugimoto, D. 1997, ApJ, 480, 432 Meaburn, J., Hebden, J. C., Morgan, B. L., Vine, H. 1982, MNRAS, 200, 1P Moffat, A. F. J., Poitras, V., Marchenko, S. V., Shara, M. M., Zurek, D. R., Bergeron, E., Antokhina, E. A. 2004, AJ, 128, 2854 Piatti, A. E., Bica, E., Claria, J. J. 1998, A&AS, 127, 423 Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W. 2002, ApJ, 576, 899 Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W., Hut, P., Makino, J. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 199 Stolte, A., Brandner, W., Grebel, E. K., Lenzen, R., La- grange, A.-M. 2005, ApJ, 628, L113 Spitzer, L. 1987, Dynamical evolution of globular clusters (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press) Vesperini, E., Heggie, D. C. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 898 L6 Simon F. Portegies Zwart et al. function for higher masses is then the result of the dynamical evolution of the cluster. The initial model which is most comparable to the ob- served Arches cluster has a Salpeter initial mass function between 1 M⊙ and 100 M⊙ and with a reasonably concen- trated initial density profile (W0 > ∼ 4 and W0 < ∼ 8). The break in the mass function in the inner parts of the cluster (for r < ∼ 4rcore) appear at mp ≃ 2hmi, which for our simulations is at about 5 M⊙. The break in the observed mass function in the Arches cluster appears around the same mass of mp ≃ 5 -- 6 M⊙. We performed additional simulations with W0 = 9 using a Salpeter mass function down to 0.1 M⊙, and in this case the break in the core mass function also developed around mp ≃ 2hmi, which for the adopted mass function is about 1.0 M⊙(Figure 5). Based on these findings we argue that the initial mass function in the Arches cluster has a lower limit of about 1.0 M⊙, as in our simulations that reproduce the observations best. We predict that other clusters with similar parameters as the Arches cluster, like Westerlund 1 (Piatti et al. 1998), NGC 3603 (Moffat et al. 2004), R 136 (Meaburn et al. 1982) and Quintuplet (Cotera et al. 1992) will show similar char- acteristics as Arches. The mass functions in their cores will also be rather flat for stars more massive than 5 -- 6 M⊙. And the mass functions further away from the cluster centre will gradually be more like the initial mass function. ACKNOWLEGMENTS We are grateful to Peter Anders, Mark Gieles, Alessia Gualandris, Douglas Heggie and Henny Lamers for many discussions. This work was supported by NWO (grants #635.000.303 and #643.200.503), NOVA, the LKBF, the ISSI in Bern, Switzerland and the Taiwanese government (grants NSC095-2917-I-008-006 and NSC95-2112-M-008- 006). MAG is supported by a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship under the sixth framework programme. The cal- culations for this work were done on the MoDeStA computer in Amsterdam, which is hosted by the SARA supercomputer centre. REFERENCES Aarseth S. J., 2003, Gravitational N-body simulations, Cambridge University press Cotera, A. S., Erickson, E. F., Colgan, S. W. J., Simpson, J. P., Allen, D. A., Burton, M. G. 1996, ApJ, 461, 750 Cotera, A. S., Erickson, E. F., Simpson, J. P., Colgan, S. W. J., Allen, D. A., Burton, M. G. 1992, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, p. 1262 Figer, D. F., Kim, S. S., Morris, M., Serabyn, E., Rich, R. M., McLean, I. S. 1999, ApJ, 525, 750 Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 1037 Gurkan, M. A., Freitag, M., Rasio, F. A. 2004, ApJ, 604, 632 Heggie D. C., Trenti M., Hut P., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 677 Heggie, D. C., Mathieu, R. D. 1986, LNP Vol. 267: The Use of Supercomputers in Stellar Dynamics, in P. Hut, S. McMillan (eds.), Lecture Not. Phys 267, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
astro-ph/0611889	1	0611	2006-11-29T13:13:22	Origin of Superluminal radio jets in GRS 1915+105 and the role of the Plateau state	[ "astro-ph" ]	We have studied the accretion disk during the radio plateau state and the following superluminal relativistic radio jets and have provided a tight correlation between accretion disk and superluminal jet parameters. We find that accretion rate during the plateaux is very high and suggest that the accretion disk during the radio plateaux is always associated with radiation-driven wind. The internal shock forms in the previously generated slowly moving wind (during plateau) with $\beta$ $\le$ 0.01 as the fast moving discrete jet (usually at the end of plateau) with $\beta$ $\sim$ 1 catches up and interacts with it. The power of superluminal jet is determined by the strength and speed of these two components; the slow moving wind and the fast moving jet which are related to the accretion disk during the plateau state. Finally, we discuss the implication of this work.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Origin of Superluminal radio jets in GRS 1915+105 and the role of the Plateau state Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai-400005, India J S Yadav Abstract We have studied the accretion disk during the radio plateau state and the following superluminal relativistic radio jets and have provided a tight correlation between accretion disk and superluminal jet parameters. We find that accretion rate during the plateaux is very high and suggest that the accretion disk during the radio plateaux is always associated with radiation- driven wind. The internal shock forms in the previously generated slowly moving wind (during plateau) with β ≤ 0.01 as the fast moving discrete jet (usually at the end of plateau) with β ∼ 1 catches up and interacts with it. The power of superluminal jet is determined by the strength and speed of these two components; the slow moving wind and the fast moving jet which are related to the accretion disk during the plateau state. Finally, we discuss the implication of this work. 6 0 0 2 v o N 9 2 1 v 9 8 8 1 1 6 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a VI Microquasar Workshop: Microquasars and Beyond September 18-22, 2006 Como, Italy 1 1 Introduction In active galactic nuclei (AGN) & quasars, large superluminal outflows/jets are known to exist for almost half century yet remain poorly understood. This is probably due to the lower characteristic accretion disk temperature as well as the fact that the central part of these systems is usually obscured by a large amount of dust. The long time scales associated with these massive systems pause an additional observational problem. Discovery of the first microquasar GRS 1915+105 in 1994 in our Galaxy revived great hope to study the disk-jet connection in general and the origin of superluminal jets in particular [1]. Microquasars are closer, smaller and show faster variability that is easily observable. GRS 1915+105 has shown exceptionally high variability in X-rays as well as in radio. Since 1996, rich X-ray variability of this source is observed by RXTE [2, 3] and by the Indian X-ray Astronomy Experiment, IXAE [4]. Belloni et al. (2000) have classified the complex X-ray variability of GRS 1915+105 in 12 separate classes on the basis of their light curves and color-color diagrams and suggested three basic states of this source, namely hard state and two softer states with different temperatures of the accretion disk. The radio emission from GRS 1915+105 can be broadly put into two classes; (1) radio emission close to the compact object (¡200 AU), and (2) radio emission at large distances (≥ 240 AU). The former class includes (a) steady radio jets (radio plateau state), (b) preplateau flares, and (c) oscillations/baby jets (discrete jets) of 20-40 min duration in infrared (IR) & radio while the latter class includes large superluminal radio jets. The steady radio jets of 20 -- 160 mJy flux density are associated with the canonical low hard X-ray state and observed for extended durations [6, 7]. These are optically thick compact jets with velocity β of 0.1 -- 0.4 [8, 9]. The radio emission is correlated with the X-ray emission as Lradio ∝ L0.7 X for several different sources [10]. Pooley & Fender (1997) observed radio oscillations with delayed emission at lower frequency. Simultaneous X-ray, IR and radio multi-wavelength observations provided first major step in our understanding of disk-jet interaction and suggested that the spike in X-ray coincides with the beginning of IR flare and it has self absorbed synchrotron emission associated with adiabatic expansion [12, 13]. These are also compact jets with velocity β ∼ 1 [8]. The relativistic superluminal jets with up to 1 Jy flux density have steep radio spectrum and are observed at large distances few hundred AU to 5000 AU from the core [1, 14, 8]. These radio jets are very energetic with luminosity close to the Eddington luminosity, LEdd and have been observed in several sources [14, 15, 16, 17]. Progress in our understanding of these jets, especially of their connection to the accretion disk has been slow. The physical connection between X-ray emission and the superluminal flares has been the hardest to understand. In this paper, we investigate the association of large superluminal jets with the radio plateaux. We have analysed the available RXTE PCA/HEXTE X-ray data during radio plateaux and the radio flare data from the Green Bank Interferometer (GBI). Yadav (2006) has described the analysis procedure and the selection criteria in detail. 2 Superluminal Radio Flare Properties Associated Preceding Plateau Properties MJD/ Date Peak Flux (mJy) Decay Time constant (days) 50750/1997 Oct 30 50916/1998 Apr 13 50933/1998 Apr 30 50967/1998 Jun 03 51204/1999 Jan 30 51337/1999 Jun 08 51535/1999 Dec 23 52105/2001 Jul 16b a: Integrated 3 -- 150 keV X-ray flux in 10−8 ergs cm−2 s−1 b: VLBA radio data (see text for details) 3.16+0.07 −0.09 4.02+0.36 −0.33 3.98+0.13 −0.13 2.82+0.48 −0.28 1.12+0.03 −0.05 2.67+0.22 −0.16 2.67+0.12 −0.14 1.77+0.20 −0.20 550 920 580 710 340 490 510 210 Rise Time (day) <0.6 <0.8 <0.9 0.3 0.25 <0.7 <0.8 <0.7 Date of GBI Flux RXTE (mJy) Obser. 47.3 91.0 91.0 56.2 27.8 45.5 51.3 20.0 1997 Oct. 25 1998 Apr. 11 1998 Apr. 28 1998 May 31 1999 Jan. 24 1999 Jun. 03 1999 Dec. 21 2001 Jul. 11 QPO Total Freq. X-ray Fluxa (Hz) 2.04 1.88 2.42 1.60 2.34 1.41 1.76 2.14 1.84 2.55 1.98 1.77 2.23 2.12 2.40 1.75 NH (1022 cm−2) 13.27+0.66 −0.91 14.95+0.82 −0.65 13.55+0.78 −0.31 12.99+0.81 −0.32 11.19+0.92 −0.95 12.43+0.95 −1.15 13.61+1.17 −0.94 10.60+0.77 −0.40 Table 1: All selected superluminal radio flares and their properties (see text for details). X-ray Properties from RXTE PCA/HEXTE data during preceding radio plateau. 2 Observations and analysis The typical sequence of events for a superluminal radio flare is shown in Figure 1 for the 550 mJy radio flare on 1997 October 30 (gap in GBI data at peak) and for the 340 mJy radio flare on 1999 January 30. The start of the radio flares is offset to zero. A superluminal event starts with small preplateau flares followed by a steady long plateau, followed by superluminal radio flares. The preplateau flares are discrete ejections of adiabatically expanding synchrotron clouds with flat radio emission and are similar to the oscillations/discrete jets. The exponential decay is an important characteristic of superluminal radio flares which differentiates them from the other class of radio flares which occur close to the compact object [20]. It is also found that the radio plateau is always associated with a superluminal radio flare [14, 21, 22]. We searched 2.25 GHz GBI radio monitoring data during the period from 1996 December to 2000 April and selected radio plateaux and the following radio flares which decay exponentially. All the selected superluminal flares are given in Table 1 along with associated X-ray properties. One more radio flare on 2001 July 16 which was observed by the Very Large Baseline Array (VLBA) and Ratan radio telescope is also added in Table 1. VLBA observations clearly showed an ejecta well separated from the core [23]. We study X-ray properties during radio plateaux within the preceding week from the start of superluminal flares to avoid changes in accretion disk over the long durations of plateaux (from -7 to -2 in Figure 1). We also avoid the last day of plateaux as radio data suggest rapid changes in the accretion disk. For the timing analysis, we used single-bit-mode RXTE/PCA data in the energy ranges 3.6 -- 5.7 and 5.7 -- 14.8 keV. Normalised power density spectra of 256 bin are generated and co-added for every 16 s. During the plateaux, it is in a very high luminosity state (VHS) with power law index Γ > 2 . The spectrum is dominated by the Compton scattered emission (≥ 85%) rather than the disk. A model consisting of disk + power law + a comptonised component (CompTT) with a gaussian line at 6.4 keV is used for the X-ray analysis. The integrated radio flux is calculated by integrating the fitted exponential function over a duration three times the decay time constant. Further details of X-ray and 3 Figure 1: GBI 2.25 GHz radio data for the 1999 January 30 (start at MJD 51204.7) and 1997 October 30 (start at MJD 50750.6) large superluminal radio flares. Start of the flares is offset to 0. The dotted line connects the data points of the 1999 January 30 superluminal radio flare to guide the eyes. radio data analysis are given in Yadav (2006) [20]. 3 Results and discussion It is increasingly believed that the coronal material (and not the disk material) is ejected prior to radio flares [24, 22, 18, 25]. It is consistent with the observation that radio flares are observed during the transition from the low hard state to the high soft state but never observed during the opposite transition [21]. It also agrees with the suggestion that the spike in X-ray during the β- class is associated with the change of the X-ray state due to a major ejection episode [26]. Once this coronal material is ejected, it invariably decouples from the disk. However, this decoupling may not produce any observable effect during the plateaux as inflow and outflow in the accretion disk are in equilibrium. Both the accretion disk and the radio flare are in steady state. On the other hand, decoupling is supposed to produce maximum effect during the superluminal radio flares which are observed at large distances of a few hundred to few thousand AU from the core [6, 14, 8]. This has made disk-jet connection the hardest to understand for superluminal radio jets [18, 19]. In Figure 2, we plot the total 3 -- 150 keV X-ray flux during the preceding plateau vs the integrated radio flux of the superluminal flare. We derive a correlation coefficient of 0.99 sug- 4 Figure 2: Correlation between the total 3-150 keV X-ray flux from spectral analysis of RXTE PCA/HEXTE X-ray data during preflare plateau state and the integrated flux of the super- luminal radio flare. The solid line is the linear fit to the data points. gesting a strong connection between the total X-ray flux during the preceding plateau state and the integrated radio flux of the superluminal flare. The total X-ray flux is dominated by the Compton scattered emission or coronal emission (≥ 85%). Using the total Compton scattered emission flux instead of the total X-ray flux improves this correlation with a correla- tion coefficient of 0.996. In Figure 3, we plot the QPO frequency from our timing analysis of X-ray data during the plateau state as a function of the decay time constant of the following superluminal radio flare. This also shows a tight correlation, with correlation coefficient of 0.98. The QPOs are believed to be associated with the coronal flow. The remarkable feature of our findings here is that the parameters calculated using completely independent spectral and timing analysis bring out a clear connection between the accretion disk during the plateau state and the following superluminal radio flare. In the last column of Table 1, we give the calculated absorption column density NH . The NH ranges from 10×1022 to 15×1022 cm−2 which are higher than the commonly used NH ∼ 5 -- 6×1022 cm−2 for spectral analysis of GRS 1915+105 . The calculated NH shows a tight correlation with the CompTT flux and not with the disk blackbody flux. This rules out the possibility that the enhanced NH may be due to overestimation of the disk normalisation. Yadav (2006) has discussed this in detail and compared these with results obtained from Chandra and ASCA data [27, 28]. Lee et al. (2002) have analysed Chandra & RXTE X- ray data during a radio plateau state and have suggested presence of disk wind. Kotani et al. (2000) also came to a similar conclusion using ASCA data. The wind terminal velocity is estimated to be of the order of 108 cm s−1 (β ≤ 0.01). The lower limit of bolometric luminosity Lbol ∼ LX = 6.4×1038 ergs s−1 which is 0.35 of Eddington Luminosity LEdd, for a black hole 5 Figure 3: Correlation between the quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) frequency from timing analysis of RXTE/PCA X-ray data during preflare plateau state and the decay time constant of the superluminal radio flare. The dotted line is the linear fit to the data. of mass 14 M⊙ [27]. The corresponding lower limit of bolometric luminosity for the X-ray flux listed in Table 1 falls in the range 0.35 -- 0.48 of LEdd. When GRS 1915+105 is accreting near LEdd, the presence of a radiation-driven wind is always expected and the wind density should be a strong function of the disk luminosity. Our derived values of NH show strong dependence on observed total X-ray flux with correlation coefficient of 0.995 [30]. The calculated power density spectra shown in Figure 4 also independently lend support to the presence of wind during the plateau state. Figure 4 shows PDS spectra observed on 2001 July 11 and 1998 April 28. The Compton scattered flux increases from 1.5×10−8 ergs cm−2 s−1 on 2001 July 11 to 1.9×10−8 ergs cm−2 s−1 on 1998 April 28 while the observed QPO frequency decreases from 2.4 Hz on 2001 July 11 to 1.4 Hz on 1998 April 28. It is clear from Figure 4 that the power at frequency ν > 0.2 Hz is less in the PDS observed on 1998 April 28 than that observed on 2001 July 11. The fast variability is suppressed by photon scattering in the enhanced wind on 1998 April 28, hence reducing the power in the PDS at higher frequencies. Shaposhnikov & Titarchuk (2006) have discussed the decrease in the PDS power observed in Cyg X-1 at higher frequency (ν > 0.1 Hz) as the wind increases. In Cyg X- 3, the PDS power in the low hard state drops to below 10−3 (rms/mean)2 Hz−1 at frequencies ν > 0.1 Hz as a dense wind from the companion always envelops the compact object [30]. These results support the internal shock model for the origin of superluminal flares [31]. The internal shock should form in the previously generated slowly moving wind from the accretion disk with β ≤ 0.01 as the fast moving discrete jet with β ∼ 1 [8] catches up and interacts with it. Both the components, slow moving wind and fast moving jet, are related to the accretion disk during plateau state and the strength & speed of these two components 6 Figure 4: Normalised power density spectra in 0.09 -- 9 Hz frequency range observed on 1998 April 28 and 2001 July 11. Strong QPOs are seen at 1.4 Hz and 2.4 Hz in PDS observed on 1998 April 28 and 2001 July 11 respectively. The total Compton scattered flux is also given. will determine the power of the internal shock. The wind deposits a large amount of energy as mwind approaches maccr prior to the switch-on of superluminal flare [20]. Thus, the internal shock model can easily accommodate high jet power requirement ≥ 1038 ergs s−1 [14] and can explain the shifting from thick to thin radio emission during superluminal flares [31]. Our results in Figure 5 which shows the peak flux of superluminal radio flares as a function of NH strongly support our description of superluminal radio flares. A fit to the data (dotted line) suggests that for wind strength corresponding to NH ≤ 8.3±1.5×1022 cm−2, no superluminal jet will be produced. The absence of superluminal jets during the class β in GRS 1915+105 is attributed to the absence of wind [20]. The calculated NH during class β is below this critical NH value [30]. This model of superluminal jets can provide simple explanations for (1) why the direction of superluminal jets may differ from the direction of the compact jets, (2) why the phase lag is complex during plateaux, and (3) why compact (discrete) jets are absent in Cyg X-3 [20]. In Figure 6, we show a sketch of the heliosphere due to disk wind and mark the locations of various types of radio emission seen in GRS 1915+105 . All the radio flares observed in GRS 1915+105 can be broadly put into two groups on the basis of their flux, radio spectrum and spatial distribution; (1) the superluminal flares (200 -- 1000 mJy) which have steep radio spectra and are seen at large distances (≥ 240 AU), and (2) all other flares (5 -- 360 mJy) which include the preplateau flares, radio oscillations & discrete flares and the steady radio emission during the plateaux. All these flares have flat radio spectra and are observed close to the compact object. All these radio flares are consistent with the ejection of an adiabatically 7 Figure 5: Correlation between the absorption column density, NH and the peak flux of the superluminal radio flares. The peak flux of a superluminal flare is calculated using exponential profile fitting if there is a gap in radio data. The dotted line is a linear fit to the data. expanding self absorbing synchrotron cloud from the accretion disk and this cloud is supposed to consist of coronal mass. During the radio plateau, it may be confined expansion due to the presence of a dense wind which agrees with the source size [8]. The IR & radio oscillations (5 -- 150) are periodic ejections of adiabatically expanding self absorbing synchrotron clouds [13, 32]. The preplateau radio flares (50 -- 360 mJy) are discrete ejections which are closely spaced in time and hence produce overlapped radio flares. The preplateau flares have been modeled as adiabatically expanding self absorbing clouds ejected from the accretion disk (like in the case of oscillations & discrete jets) which explain reasonably well all the available observed data of time delay for radio emission at lower frequency [32]. All these types of radio emission in GRS 1915+105 starts somewhere close to the corona. As discussed above, the maccr, as inferred from the X-ray flux, is very high during the radio plateaux and Lbol approaches LEdd. It is suggested that such hot accretion disk during the radio plateaux always accompanies with a radiation-driven wind. The NH is tightly correlated with the COMPTT flux. This is analogous to the solar wind originating from the dense solar corona. Since the disk wind power & speed are higher than those of solar wind (the average solar wind speed ∼ 450 km/s), the size of heliosphere due to the disk wind may be around 200-300 AU (the solar heliosphere size is of 100-150 AU and it is supposed to vary with the solar activity). It is expected that the size of disk heliosphere will increase as the wind power increases with disk luminosity as discussed earlier. As shown in Figure 6, superluminal radio 8 Figure 6: Sketch diagram (not to the scale) of the heliosphere created by disk wind similar to the solar heliosphere. The locations are marked where different types of radio jets are produced. Superluminal jets start at the boundary of the disk heliosphere while all other types of the jets start somewhere close to the corona. jets are suggested to appear at the boundary of disk heliosphere. It is expected that strong superluminal jets should appear at larger distances than the distance where weak superluminal jets appear. A superluminal jet with peak flux of ∼ 200 mJy was reported around 240 AU on 2001 July 16[23] while strong superluminal jets are suggested to appear around 500 AU (the peaks of these superluminal flares are not observed but the data are consistent with the above suggestion) [8]. This can be easily tested in future with VLBA and other high resolution radio data if we catch the start of superluminal flares in GRS 1915+105 as well as in other LMXBs. 4 Conclusions We have provided a tight correlation between accretion disk and superluminal jet parameters. We find that maccr during the plateaux is very high and suggest that the accretion disk during the radio plateaux is always associated with a radiation-driven wind. The internal shock forms in the previously generated slowly moving wind (during plateau) with β ≤ 0.01 as the fast moving discrete jet (usually at the end of plateau) with β ∼ 1 catches up and interacts with 9 it. The strength & speed of these two components determine the power of the internal shock as well as of the superluminal jets. The peak flux of the superluminal jets is tightly correlated with the wind power. We discuss the implications of this work and some of these can be checked in future. Acknowledgment: The author thanks the RXTE PCA/HEXTE and NSF-NRAO-NASA Green Bank Interferometer teams for making their data publicly available. The Green Bank Interferometer is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated by the NRAO in support of NASA High Energy Astrophysics programs. References [1] Mirabel, I. F., & Rodriguez, L. F. 1994, Nature, 371, 46 [2] Morgan, E. H., Remillard, R. A. & Greiner, J. 1997, ApJ, 482, 1010 [3] Muno, M. P., Morgan, E. H. & Remillard, R. A. 1999, ApJ, 527, 321 [4] Yadav, J. S., Rao, A. R., Agrawal, P. C, et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 935 [5] Belloni, T., Klein-Wolt, M., Mendez, M., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, 271 [6] Muno, M. P., Remillard, R. A., Morgan, E. H., et al. 2001, ApJ, 556, 515 [7] Fuchs, Y., Rodriguez, J., Mirabel, I. F. et al. 2003, A&A, 409, L35 [8] Dhawan, V., Mirabel, I. F. & Rodriguez, L. F. 2000, ApJ, 543, 373 [9] Ribo, M., Dhawan, V. & Mirabel, I. F. 2004, Proc. 7th European VLBI network sympo- sium, p. 111 [10] Gallo, E., Fender, R. P., & Pooley, G. G. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 60 [11] Pooley, G. G. & Fender, R. P. 1997, MNRAS, 292, 925 [12] Eikenberry, S. S., Matthews, K., Morgan, E. H., et al. 1998, ApJ, 494, L61 [13] Mirabel, I. F., Dhawan, V., Chaty, S. et al. 1998, A&A, 330, L9 [14] Fender, R. P., Garrington, S. T., McKay, D. J. et al. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 865 [15] Hjellming, R. M., & Rupen, M. P. 1995, Nature, 375, 464 [16] Wu, K., Soria, R., Campbell-Wilson, D., et al. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1161 [17] Orosz, J. A., Kuulkers, E., van der Klis, M. 2001, ApJ, 555, 489 [18] Fender, R. P., Belloni, T. M. & Gallo, E. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1105 10 [19] Fender, R. P. & Belloni, T. M. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 317 [20] Yadav, J. S., 2006, ApJ, 646, 385 [21] Klein-Wolt, M., Fender, R. P., Pooley, G. G., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 745 [22] Vadawale, S. V., Rao, A. R., Naik, S., Yadav, J. S., et al. 2003, ApJ, 597, 1023 [23] Dhawan, V., Muno, M. P., Remillard, R., et al. 2003 preprint. [24] Rau, A., & Greiner, J. 2003, A&A, 397, 711 [25] Rothstein, D. M., Eikenberry, S. S. & Matthews, K. 2005, ApJ, 626, 991 [26] Yadav, J. S. 2001, ApJ, 548, 876 [27] Lee, J. C., Reynolds, C. S., Remillard, R. , et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 1102 [28] Kotani, T., Ebisawa, K., Dotani, T., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 413 [29] Shaposhnikov, N., & Titarchuk, L. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1098 [30] Yadav, J. S., 2006, "Relativistic superluminal radio jets in microquasars in our galaxy" this conferece. [31] Kaiser, C. R., Sunyaev, R. & Spruit, H. C. 2000, A&A, 356, 975 [32] Ishwara-Chandra, C. H., Yadav, J. S., & Pramesh Rao, A. 2002, A&A, 388, L33 11
0805.1452	1	0805	2008-05-10T06:40:49	The Molecular Ridge Close to 30 Doradus in the Large Magellanic Cloud	[ "astro-ph" ]	With the ATNF Mopra telescope we are performing a survey in the 12CO(1-0) line to map the molecular gas in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). For some regions we also obtained interferometric maps of the high density gas tracers HCO+ and HCN with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). Here we discuss the properties of the elongated molecular complex that stretches about 2 kpc southward from 30 Doradus. Our data suggests that the complex, which we refer to as the ``molecular ridge,'' is not a coherent feature but consists of many smaller clumps that share the same formation history. Likely molecular cloud formation triggers are shocks and shearing forces that are present in the surrounding south-eastern HI overdensity region, a region influenced by strong ram pressure and tidal forces. The molecular ridge is at the western edge of the the overdensity region where a bifurcated velocity structure transitions into a single disk velocity component. We find that the 12CO(1-0) and HI emission peaks in the molecular ridge are typically near each other but never coincide. A likely explanation is the conversion of warmer, low-opacity HI to colder, high-opacity HI from which H2 subsequently forms. On smaller scales, we find that very dense molecular gas, as traced by interferometric HCO+ and HCN maps, is associated with star formation along shocked filaments and with rims of expanding shell-like structures, both created by feedback from massive stars.	astro-ph	astro-ph	The Molecular Ridge Close to 30 Doradus in the Large Magellanic Cloud Jurgen OttA,B,L, Tony WongC, Jorge L. PinedaD, Annie HughesE,F, Erik MullerF,M, Zhi-Yun LiG, Min WangH, Lister Staveley-SmithI, Yasuo FukuiJ, Axel WeissK, Christian HenkelK, & Ulrich KleinD A National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA B California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Caltech Astronomy 104 -- 25, Pasadena, CA, 91125 -- 2400, USA C Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois, 1002 W. Green St., Urbana, IL 61801, USA D Argelander Institut fur Astronomie, Universitat Bonn, Auf dem Hugel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany E Centre for Supercomputing and Astrophysics, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia F CSIRO Australia Telescope National Facility, Cnr Vimiera & Pembroke Roads, Marsfield, NSW 2122, Australia G Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, PO Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22903-4325, USA H Purple Mountain Observatories, CAS, 2 West Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China I School of Physics M013, University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia J Department of Astrophysics, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusaku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan K Max-Planck-Institut fur Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany L Jurgen Ott is a Jansky Fellow of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. E-mail: [email protected] M Bolton Fellow Abstract: With the ATNF Mopra telescope we are performing a survey in the 12CO(1-0) line to map the molecular gas in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). For some regions we also obtained interferometric maps of the high density gas tracers HCO+ and HCN with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). Here we discuss the properties of the elongated molecular complex that stretches about 2 kpc southward from 30 Doradus. Our data suggests that the complex, which we refer to as the "molecular ridge," is not a coherent feature but consists of many smaller clumps that share the same formation history. Likely molecular cloud formation triggers are shocks and shearing forces that are present in the surrounding south-eastern H i overdensity region, a region influenced by strong ram pressure and tidal forces. The molecular ridge is at the western edge of the the overdensity region where a bifurcated velocity structure transitions into a single disk velocity component. We find that the 12CO(1-0) and H i emission peaks in the molecular ridge are typically near each other but never coincide. A likely explanation is the conversion of warmer, low-opacity H i to colder, high-opacity H i from which H2 subsequently forms. On smaller scales, we find that very dense molecular gas, as traced by interferometric HCO+ and HCN maps, is associated with star formation along shocked filaments and with rims of expanding shell-like structures, both created by feedback from massive stars. Keywords: ISM: evolution -- ISM: molecules -- galaxies: ISM -- galaxies: individual(Large Magel- lanic Cloud) -- radio lines: ISM -- (galaxies:) Magellanic Clouds 1 Introduction The study of star formation (SF) in molecular clouds is an area which has seen rapid progress in recent years and the Magellanic Clouds are increasingly seen as one of the most important laboratories for this re- search. At a distance of about 50 -- 60 kpc and an in- clination angle of ∼ 35◦ (van der Marel & Cioni 2001) for the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), current and future instruments can resolve individual star-forming regions on sub -- parsec scales and, at the same time, assess the global picture on galactic scales. The Mag- ellanic Clouds also contain a large range of very differ- ent environments that can be observed to test theories of star formation. The 30 Doradus (30 Dor) region in the LMC, for example, is the most vigorous site of current SF in the Local Group. Consequently, the sur- roundings of 30 Dor are dominated by a strong far -- UV radiation field. Possible triggering of SF on expand- ing shells can be studied, e.g., in the LMC 4 region 1 2 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia toward the northeast of the LMC (e.g. Braun et al. 1997; Yamaguchi et al. 2001; Cohen et al. 2003). In addition, the LMC and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) are gravitationally interacting with each other and with the Galaxy (cf. the numerical models of, e.g., Murai & Fujimoto 1980; Gardiner et al. 1994; Staveley-Smith et al. 2003; Connors et al. 2006), and the motion of the LMC through the Galactic halo causes strong ram pressure effects (e.g. de Boer et al. 1998a). It should be noted, however, that tidal or ram pressure models alone cannot explain the full morphol- ogy and dynamics of the gas and stars in the Magel- lanic System, and a synthesis of both is likely required (Mastropietro et al. 2005). All of these external inter- actions, as well as factors internal to the LMC (e.g., shocks, density waves, and bar-induced motions), in- fluence the ability to form stars on local and global scales and can potentially be studied in the Magellanic Clouds in great detail. Also, with metallicities of ∼ 30% and ∼ 10% so- lar in the LMC and SMC, respectively, cooling and chemistry of gas in the Magellanic Clouds are clearly different than in the Galaxy and the conditions may re- semble those at higher redshifts, at times when galax- ies were generally less evolved than today. Another important property of the Magellanic Clouds and in particular the LMC is that the numbers of resolved gi- ant molecular clouds with associated star formation is large. For example, Fukui et al. (1999) counted 107 molecular complexes in the 2.6′ (=37 pc) resolution NANTEN 12CO(1-0) survey of the LMC. It is there- fore possible to derive statistically meaningful results for a large sample of regions, all at the same distance and therefore resolution. The location of 30 Dor and the surrounding mas- sive atomic and molecular gas reservoir dominating the south-eastern part of the LMC had led to many speculations on its structure and star forming history. Fujimoto & Noguchi (1990), for example and, more re- cently, Bekki & Chiba (2007) were able to model this region based on dynamical and hydro -- dynamical sim- ulations of the LMC -- SMC interaction, not including the Galaxy. Gardiner et al. (1998), on the other hand attempted to simulate the amount of star formation based on the dynamics of the off-center bar in the LMC. Their simulations, though not designed to pre- dict the gas distribution, do show that asymmetries can be induced by the bar. de Boer et al. (1998a) pointed out that the ages of structures in the LMC increase clockwise from the eastern 30 Dor region to- ward the north. They argued that the LMC may undergo SF triggered by a bow-shock at the eastern edge, where the ram pressure due to the LMC's mo- tion through the Galactic halo is expected to be great- est. The clockwise rotation of the LMC then turns the newly formed, but now aging stellar populations to- ward the north. In other words, ram pressure creates a 'hot spot' of SF (currently 30 Dor) that remains in the eastern part of the LMC while the galaxy rotation brings fresh gas toward and newly formed stars away from it. If this interpretation is correct, one may infer that conditions upstream from 30 Dor, i.e., from the east toward the south, may be those encountered just before stars eventually form. This would be a very for- tunate situation as it is usually difficult to predict the timescales and locations of future SF in galaxies. It is common knowledge that stars form out of molecular gas, and indeed the region south of 30 Dor contains a remarkably straight, elongated CO struc- ture which we refer to as the "molecular ridge." 12CO(1- 0) maps from the Columbia survey (Cohen et al. 1988), the NANTEN telescope (Fukui et al. 1999), and the SEST key project (Kutner et al. 1997; Johansson et al. 1998) show that, with a mass of 107 M⊙, about 1/3 of all of the molecular gas that is traced by CO is found in this structure stretching ∼ 2 kpc south of 30 Dor. Johansson et al. (1998) provides an analysis of the N 159 and 30 Dor regions and they find kinetic tem- peratures in the 10-50 K range. Kutner et al. (1997) were able to describe the southern part of the molecu- lar ridge but they restricted their analysis to a descrip- tion of the general morphology of the feature and a comparison of line strength to those in Galactic clouds. In this paper we present first results of a compre- hensive, high angular resolution 12CO(1-0) survey of the entire molecular ridge obtained with the ATNF Mopra1 telescope. The observations are the pilot for the MAGMA project ('The Magellanic Mopra Assess- ment') which is currently underway and which will provide high resolution 12CO(1-0) maps of molecular clouds across the entire LMC and SMC, mapping all regions where NANTEN has detected emission, but with a beam size ∼ 16 times smaller in area. In terms of sensitivity and resolution, MAGMA is comparable to the SEST key program but MAGMA encompasses all CO traced molecular clouds rather than a selected ensemble. In Sect. 2 we describe the observations and data reduction, which is followed by the presentation of our results in Sect. 3. A discussion of the results is provided in Sect. 4 and a summary in Sect. 5. 2 Observations and Data Re- duction During the 2005 southern winter season, we observed the molecular ridge close to 30 Dor with the single dish Mopra telescope in the 12CO(1-0) molecular transition (rest frequency: 115.271 GHz). Mopra was used in the on -- the -- fly mapping mode and we observed about ∼ 120 5′ × 5′ maps in two orthogonal scanning direc- tions with 1.8 h integration time each. The total time on source was therefore of order 250 h. The Mopra AT correlator was set up to observe at a bandwidth of 64 MHz split into 1024 channels. This corresponds to a velocity coverage of ∼ 166 km s−1 and a resolu- tion of ∼ 0.16 km s−1 and the spectral window was centered on a velocity of 230 km s−1 LSR. The ob- servation of each map was preceded by pointing cali- bration on the bright SiO maser R Dor, with typical corrections less than 5". T ∗ A system temperatures of the observations were usually ∼ 600 K and the data 1The Mopra radio telescope is part of the Australia Tele- scope which is funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 3 were calibrated against a warm absorber that was in- serted every ∼ 30 minutes. The final data set has a size of ∼ 0.6◦ × 2.0◦ which, at an assumed distance of the LMC of 50 kpc, corresponds to 0.5 kpc×1.8 kpc, the long side along declination. A map of the survey region is shown in Fig. 1. The natural spatial resolu- tion of Mopra at ∼ 115 GHz is about 35". The data was reduced with the ATNF package livedata to derive the quotient against line -- free reference positions up to ∼ 0.5◦ away from the observed fields. First -- order baselines fitted to line -- free channels were subtracted from the resulting spectra. All data were regridded to produce a position-position-velocity 3-dimensional data cube using gridzilla. The 'inner' Mopra error beam is in the range of 40"-80" which is similar to the size of the emission and for the analysis here we applied the extended beam efficiency of ηxb = 0.55 (Ladd et al. 2005) to convert T ∗ A to extended beam brightnesses Txb. For better signal -- to -- noise ratios, the data were eventually smoothed to a resolution of 45", which corresponds to a physical length of ∼ 11 pc. The rms noise of the data is about 0.4 K in a 0.16 km s−1 velocity channel. A comparison with earlier SEST data at a similar resolution (Johansson et al. 1998) toward the molecular gas in N 159 shows that the Mopra and SEST fluxes agree within 10%. 3 Results Maps of the molecular ridge derived from the 12CO(1- 0) data cube are displayed in Fig. 2. The integrated in- tensity map clearly shows that the molecular ridge is a slim (width: ∼ 100 − 200 pc) but long (∼ 1.8 kpc) fea- ture along the declination axis. The brightest clumps are toward the N159 region (see Fig. 2) and about half a degree south of it at the 'kink' of the ridge. Be- tween N159 and 30 Dor relatively little molecular gas is observed. Using the Strong et al. (1988) 'standard' Galactic CO intensity -- to -- H2 column density (XCO) conversion factor of 2.3 × 1020 cm−2 (K km s−1)−1 the detection limit (3 consecutive channels with 3σ detec- tion each) is at about 1.3 × 1020 cm−2 (correspond- ing to a mass of ∼ 200 M⊙ within a beam) and for the molecular ridge we derive a total molecular gas mass of about 3.2 × 106 M⊙. But note that studies of CO with the Columbia 1.2 m, the SEST and NAN- TEN telescopes have shown that the LMC XCO factor may be a few times larger than this Galactic value (Cohen et al. 1988; Israel 1997; Fukui et al. 1999, but see Pineda et al. 2008). For their NANTEN sur- vey data, Fukui et al. (1999) use XCO of 9 × 1020 NH2 (K km s−1)−1 and they derive a value of 4 × 107 M⊙ for the entire molecular gas in the LMC. If there are no variations of XCO within the LMC, the ratio of the fluxes should equal the ratio of masses and if we com- pare our values to those of NANTEN, we confirm that the molecular ridge contains about ∼ 1/3 of the total molecular mass of the LMC. 4 Discussion The very thin and long shape of the molecular ridge would argue for it to be a coherent structure. A com- parison of the H i and CO velocities in various position -- velocity diagrams along the ridge (Fig. 3, ATCA2 H i observations are taken from Kim et al. 1998) shows, however, that the molecular clumps are not confined to a specific velocity component of the atomic gas. In ad- dition, the molecular clumps are somewhat separated from each other, only connected by some faint common molecular envelope. This is even more obvious when the 3-dimensional position-position-velocity data cube is rotated around the declination axis. In a more global context the molecular gas in the ridge finds itself on the western edge of the south-eastern high-column density region in the LMC, at a position where the H i column densities are still high. However, the H i emission is bifurcated in two velocity components, called the disk and 'L' component (Luks & Rohlfs 1992). The veloc- ity separation of the two components is very large to- wards the eastern edge of the LMC, but they start to merge into a single velocity component at about the position of the molecular ridge (see the second moment image in Fig. 1). This suggests that the clumps in the molecular ridge were created by the same large-scale triggering event and thus have similar formation his- tories, not only in environmental terms but also on similar timescales. 4.1 Molecular Cloud Formation In Fig. 4, CO contours are overlaid over an integrated H i column density map. The CO peaks are usually found very close to H i peaks but they virtually never coincide. Such a morphology was already indicated by the lower resolution NANTEN data (resolution: ∼ 2.6′) and with the high angular resolution of Mo- pra, this is unambiguously confirmed. If, instead of the integrated H i column density, the H i peak flux is com- pared to the 12CO(1-0) intensity, the peaks of the two gas tracers are getting slightly closer to each other but they still never coincide. To quantify this effect, pixel- to-pixel correlations between the CO luminosity and the H i column density and H i peak brightness tem- perature are shown in Fig. 5. The CO bright pixels are at intermediate H i column densities and brightnesses and not at the largest values. In particular, the H i peak brightness values where the brightest CO emis- sion is observed hovers around 60 to 100 K. In the fol- lowing, we will discuss different mechanisms that may be responsible for the shift of the CO and H i emission peaks: 1. Rapid conversion of warm H i into H2. At a certain threshold, the atomic gas combines into molec- ular hydrogen and more than just the gas above the threshold is converted, creating slight depressions in the map of atomic H i. If the H i gas remains optically 2The Australia Telescope Compact Array is part of the Australia Telescope which is funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. 4 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia thin one can determine the entire amount and distri- bution of hydrogen atoms from both, H i and H2 in the gas. In this scenario one would expect a smooth distribution of hydrogen, some in atomic, and some in molecular form. As an example we consider N159. The atomic gas in this region has typical column densities of ∼ 7 × 1021 cm−2 whereas the H i at the positions of the CO peaks have a somewhat lower column of N(H i)∼ 5 × 1021 cm−2. The CO peaks (smoothed to the resolution of the H i map, 60′′) have intensities of ∼ 35 K km s−1. Converted with a Galactic XCO fac- tor, this becomes an H2 column density of N(H2)∼ 8 × 1021 cm−2 which adds to the aforementioned H i column density of ∼ 5×1021 cm−2. In total, the hydro- gen column density at the positions of the molecular clouds is determined to be N(Htotal)=N(H i)+2 N(H2) ≈ 21 × 1021 cm−2. This is a factor of ∼ 3 larger than the H i column that surrounds the molecular clumps but where no CO is detected. Therefore, the total (H i + 2 H2) hydrogen column density map exhibits a jump rather than a smooth transition whenever molecular gas is present. This sharp edge cannot be softened by a variation of the XCO factor. E.g., Fukui et al. (1999) and Israel (1997) find that the LMC has an XCO fac- tor a few times larger than the Galactic value. Using such a higher XCO would result in larger H2 columns and therefore in an even steeper rise of total hydrogen column densities. If the XCO factor is changed to pro- duce smooth hydrogen maps, where the H2 traced by CO fills in the 'holes' of H i, one requires an XCO of about 3 times less than the Galactic value. No study of the LMC or of any other low metallicity object has shown such low XCO factors before. This comparison, however, is only valid if all molec- ular gas is traced by CO. If there are extended re- gions with molecular gas that is not traced by CO, e.g., at low densities when CO may be dissociated by the surrounding radiation field but H2 is not, the sharp contrast in the total hydrogen map may be smoothed out. Such an H2 phase is hard to detect and one of the best approaches is UV absorption spectroscopy. Tumlinson et al. (2002) performed such a survey to- ward many sightlines in the LMC with FUSE. They find that the molecular hydrogen, with a fraction of ∼ 1% (cf. Galaxy: ∼ 10%), is not a huge contribu- tor to the entire gaseous ISM (see also the ORFEUS UV absorption observation presented in de Boer et al. 1998b). They were also observing sightlines close to 30 Doradus where the UV radiation is very strong. If there are large amounts of H2 that are not traced by CO due to the higher dissociation energy of H2 they should be most obvious toward that region. Indeed, the total column of H2 they find close to 30 Dor is with ∼ 1020 cm−2 one of the largest in their survey. How- ever, the H i column density towards the same sight- line is ∼ 70 times larger. Similar fractions are found all across the LMC and the column of H2 in absorp- tion never exceeds that of H i. It is therefore unlikely that the contrast between the H i and H2 column den- sities as traced by CO could be smoothed out with extended layers of molecular gas that are undetected in CO observations. This is in contrast to dust extinc- tion studies which suggest that there may be large, not CO traced reservoirs of molecular gas in the LMC (e.g. Imara & Blitz 2007). To conclude, the shifts of the H i and the CO peaks are probably not simply a result of warm hydrogen atoms (WNM) combining into H2. However, gravita- tion may accumulate a lot of material quickly in the densest molecular cores. Typical shifts between CO and H i peaks are of order 2′, which corresponds to ∼ 30 pc. Within a typical free fall time of a Myr, self-gravitation would accelerate the gas to a veloc- ity of about 30 km s−1, a velocity gradient that is not ruled out by the position velocity diagrams displayed in Fig. 3. 2. WNM to CNM to H2 conversion. As shown in Fig. 5, the H i brightness temperature, at the loca- tion where most and the brightest molecular material resides, falls into the range of 60 to 100 K which cor- responds to the kinetic temperature of the cold neutral medium in the Galactic disk (CNM, e.g., Dickey & Lockman 1990). A conversion of WNM to CNM can be achieved by a shock. Indeed, the atomic gas to the east of the molecular ridge is prone to ram pressure effects as this side is the leading edge towards the Milky Way halo. The region is also influenced by tidal effects (e.g. Staveley-Smith et al. 2003; Mastropietro et al. 2005) and it has even been speculated that this region is responsible for the origin of the Magellanic Stream (Nidever et al. 2007). The second moment map of the H i in Fig. 1 is in fact not dominated by the intrinsic line width of the neutral gas but by the separation of disk and 'L' velocity components. At the eastern edge the separation is very large and the two components become closer in velocity space toward the western di- rection. At the position of the molecular ridge the disk and 'L' components start to merge. To date the origin of the bifurcation is still under discussion (e.g. Bekki & Chiba 2007; Nidever et al. 2007) but whether it is ram pressure or tidal effects or both, the shear and shocks from such an interaction introduces energy into the ISM that may reduce the likeliness to form molecular clouds. Indeed, some molecular complexes, the 'arc' clouds, are found in the region (Mizuno et al. 2001) but the bulk of molecular gas, the molecular ridge, is found where the disk and 'L' components start to merge into a single velocity component. If this in- dicates that they are also spatially merging, one may speculate that only the combination of both compo- nents can provide enough shielding for the gas to cool down and to become molecular. In other words, shocks and/or shearing forces prop- agating from the eastern edge may convert some of the WNM into CNM. When the disk and 'L' component merge they may provide enough shielding to convert part of the CNM into molecular gas and the remain- ing, cold H i becomes optically thick and thus levels off at a brightness temperature close to the kinetic tem- perature of the CNM. 3. H i accretion. The above process does not have to be static. As discussed earlier, we cannot rule out gas moving at speeds that are required to match free- fall timescales. H i accretion after the formation of www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 5 the first molecular cores may be responsible for the pile -- up of neutral gas close to the molecular clouds. In this scenario, once the atomic gas comes close to the molecular clumps, the gas is shielded, cooled, and converted into H2 (see also Fukui 2007). H i accretion may therefore be described as a cooling flow. Cooling flows would result in decreasing H i line widths toward the molecular cores. We do not observe this on the scales of the H i-CO peak offsets but the most signifi- cant cooling may happen only very close to the molec- ular cores, too close to be resolved with the ATCA H i observations at 21 cm. 4. Mechanical feedback from massive stars. Newly formed, massive stars deposit large amounts of energy into the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM) in the form of strong stellar winds and supernovae. Virtu- ally all star-forming galaxies exhibit an ISM that is dominated by a wealth of expanding shells of all sizes. Kim et al. (2007) catalog the expanding shells in the LMC. Along the molecular ridge, the number density of the shells seems to be lower than in the rest of the LMC. It should therefore not have a significant effect on the distribution of the atomic and molecular gas. For some regions like the N 159 region, however, some shell -- like structure is observed in H i and dust maps (cf. Fig. 6) and the CO emission toward this position may coincide with the inner side of the ring, similar to what is observed toward other expanding Galactic shells or LMC 4 (Yamaguchi et al. 2001; Cappa et al. 2005). The scenario that best fits the observations is the second one, in which shocks transform WNM into op- tically thick CNM followed by conversion into H2, with or without H i accretion. The very sharp rise of the to- tal hydrogen column density inferred at the position of the molecular gas is likely an artifact of high H i opti- cal depth. On the other hand, the confinement of CO emission to clumpy structures suggests an important role for self-gravity in shaping the molecular clouds. 4.2 Star Formation Typical H i column density thresholds in massive and dwarf galaxies, above which SF is observed hover around a canonical value of ∼ 1 × 1021 cm−2 (e.g. Walter et al. 2007). Below this threshold SF appears to be sup- pressed. For most of the LMC this rule holds well. However, the south-eastern region, dominated by ram pressure and tidal forces of the LMC/SMC/Milky Way interaction, appears to be different. Virtually no SF, as traced by Hα, is observed in this region at positions where the H i column density is below 5 × 1021 cm−2. This may be due to the tidal and ram pressure forces in the two gas components of the south -- eastern LMC. On smaller scales, SF occurs in the very densest molecular clumps. We conducted a survey with the ATCA of the high-density gas tracers HCO+ and HCN towards the star-forming regions N159 (40 pointing mosaic) in the molecular ridge and toward N113 (7 pointing mosaic) at the western tip of the LMC bar. The observations have a resolution of ∼ 7′′ which, at the distance of the LMC, corresponds to a physical length of ∼ 1.7 pc. Both of the observed molecules are only excited at volume densities exceeding ∼ 104 cm−3. HCO+, however, is also a tracer for photo-dominated regions and can also form in more diffuse material where the C+ abundance is high. Integrated HCO+ in- tensity maps overlaid on 8µm Spitzer maps are shown in Fig. 6. In both regions, the dense molecular gas typ- ically overlaps or is adjacent to bright infrared (IR) emission peaks. These peaks are the locations where individual stars and stellar clusters eventually form within the larger molecular complexes traced by CO. Comparing the HCN and HCO+ maps, we find that, after beam deconvolution, the HCO+ emission is about 20-30% more extended than the HCN clumps, in agree- ment with the results presented in Wong et al. (2006). The 8µm IR morphology of N159 appears to be ring -- like and indeed it is a 1-2 Myr old wind -- blown bubble created by a central, massive star (Jones et al. 2005). Most of the dense molecular gas is situated at the rim of this shell, with relatively little observed at pro- jected sightlines towards the interior. N113, in con- trast, is a long, bent string of several individual knots, both visible in the IR and in the HCO+ and HCN maps. The string of knots curves from the south-east towards the north. This morphology appears remi- niscent of a circular arc, and close to the center of this hypothetical circle, towards the north -- east, one indeed finds HD 269219, a ∼ 30 M⊙ supergiant B star and HD 269217, an emission-line star. Thus, the dens- est pockets of molecular gas and the associated star- forming regions appear to be located on a shock front created by the two energy -- injecting massive stars, not unlike the situation of the shell in N159. The two examples, and the above discussion on molecular cloud formation argues that shocks are the major mechanism to trigger both, the formation of low-density molecular clouds and the formation of star -- forming, high-density molecular clumps within these larger structures. 5 Summary The Large Magellanic Cloud is a unique object to study molecular cloud and star formation on galaxy-wide scales with high spatial detail and in a large range of very different environments. A very prominent molec- ular feature stretches from 30 Dor ∼ 1.8 kpc south- ward; it contains about 1/3 of the entire molecular content of the LMC, as traced by CO. Our Mopra data of this molecular ridge reveals the following: • The structure is most likely not a coherent, large molecular complex but consists of smaller molec- ular clouds that are observed to be embedded in different velocity components of the neutral atomic gas. However, the global picture of the LMC shows that the molecular ridge is at the in- nermost edge of the south -- eastern high-density region of the LMC, a region where tidal and ram pressure forces have a major influence on the state of the gas. The ridge coincides with H i at high column density and is just where 6 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia the disk and 'L' H i velocity components start to merge. Thus, the molecular clouds in the ridge are likely to share the same formation histories and timescales. • The local H i and CO peaks are typically dis- placed by ∼ 30 pc. They are usually near each other but hardly ever coincident. A likely expla- nation for this morphology is that shocks propa- gate from the eastern edge of the LMC and turn warm H i into partly optically thick, cold H i and eventually into molecular hydrogen. This may happen in a static sense or via H i accre- tion. The hydrogen column densities within the molecular clumps are much larger than in the surrounding material, which indicates that the clouds are self -- gravitating. Other mechanisms, such as feedback from massive stars may also be responsible for the shift of H i and CO peaks but are likely only playing a role for a small number of molecular complexes. • Very dense pockets of molecular gas, as traced by HCO+ and HCN, are found near and coin- ciding with strong IR emission. This strengthens the suggested correlation of the very dense gas and actual star formation rates. For the N159 and N113 regions we find the high density gas peaks to be mostly located on shock fronts and on the rims of expanding shells, powered by cen- tral, massive stars. Over the coming years, the study of molecular gas in the LMC and SMC enters a new era. Our team will continue to map all the molecular gas in both sys- tems with the Mopra (MAGMA survey) and ATCA telescopes. In addition, many new facilities are cur- rently under construction or have just been completed that can be used to observe the LMC, such as APEX, ASTE, NANTEN2, ALMA, as well as satellites such as Herschel and Spitzer. Studying molecular gas in the LMC provides a unique link between Galactic and extragalactic observations and will be germane to the full understanding of star formation on all scales. References Bekki, K., & Chiba, M. 2007, PASA, 24, 21 Braun, J. M., Bomans, D. J., Will, J.-M., & de Boer, K. S. 1997,A&A, 328, 167 Cappa, C., Niemela, V. S., Mart´ın, M. C., & McClure- Griffiths, N. M. 2005, A&A, 436, 155 Cohen, R. S., Dame, T. M., Garay, G., Montani, J., de Boer, K. S., Braun, J. M., Vallenari, A., & Mebold, U. 1998, A&A, 329, L49 Dickey, J. M., & Lockman, F. J. 1990, ARA&A, 28, 215 Fujimoto, M., & Noguchi, M. 1990, PASJ, 42, 505 Fukui, Y., et al. 1999, PASJ, 51, 745 Fukui, Y. 2007, IAU Symposium, 237, 31 Gardiner, L. T., Sawa, T., & Fujimoto, M. 1994, MN- RAS, 266, 567 Gardiner, L. T., Turfus, C., & Putman, M. E. 1998, ApJL, 507, L35 Imara, N., & Blitz, L. 2007, ApJ, 662, 969 Israel, F. P. 1997, A&A, 328, 471 Johansson, L. E. B., et al. 1998, A&A, 331, 857 Jones, T. J., Woodward, C. E., Boyer, M. L., Gehrz, R. D., & Polomski, E. 2005, ApJ, 620, 731 Kim, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dopita, M. A., Freeman, K. C., Sault, R. J., Kesteven, M. J., & McConnell, D. 1998, ApJ, 503, 674 Kim, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 171, 419 Kutner, M. L., et al. 1997, A&AS, 122, 255 Ladd, N., Purcell, C., Wong, T., & Robertson, S. 2005, PASA, 22, 62 Luks, T., & Rohlfs, K. 1992, A&A, 263, 41 Mastropietro, C., Moore, B., Mayer, L., Wadsley, J., & Stadel, J. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 509 Mizuno, N., et al. 2001, PASJ, 53, 971 Murai, T., & Fujimoto, M. 1980, PASJ, 32, 581 Nidever, D. L., Majewski, S. R., & Butler Burton, W. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 706, arXiv:0706.1578 (ApJ submitted) Pineda, J. L., Ott, J., Klein, U., Wong, T., Muller, E., & Hughes, A. 2008, ApJ, submitted Staveley-Smith, L., Kim, S., Calabretta, M. R., Haynes, R. F., & Kesteven, M. J. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 87 Strong, A. W., et al. 1988, A&A, 207, 1 Tumlinson, J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 566, 857 Rubio, M., & Thaddeus, P. 1988, ApJL, 331, L95 van der Marel, R. P., & Cioni, M.-R. L. 2001, AJ, 122, Cohen, M., Staveley-Smith, L., & Green, A. 2003, MN- 1807 RAS, 340, 275 Walter, F., et al. 2007, ApJ, 661, 102 Connors, T. W., Kawata, D., & Gibson, B. K. 2006, Wong, T., Whiteoak, J. B., Ott, J., Chin, Y.-n., & MNRAS, 371, 108 Cunningham, M. R. 2006, ApJ, 649, 224 de Boer, K. S., Richetr, P., Bomans, D. J., Heithausen, A., & Koorneef, J. 1998, A&A, 338, L5 Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, N., Onishi, T., Mizuno, A., & Fukui, Y. 2001, ApJL, 553, L185 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 7 Figure 1: H i column density map of the LMC (taken from Kim et al. 1998, beam size: 1′) with the contours of our molecular ridge CO data over- laid in black. The white polygon outlines the re- gion observed. The yellow boxed insert is the same region as the one marked on the column density map but it displays the second moment of the H i data (for better signal -- to noise, this map was smoothed to three times the resolution of the inte- grated H i map.). Note that toward the south-east the second moment is dominated by the velocity difference of the disk and 'L' components rather than by the line widths of the neutral gas. 8 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia Figure 2: Mopra 12CO(1-0) maps of the molecular ridge close to 30 Dor. From left to right: Inte- grated intensity in K km s−1, intensity -- weighted velocities (moment 1), dispersions (moment 2). www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 9 Figure 3: Position velocity cuts through the CO and H i data cubes. The arrows in the left panel indicate the position, direction, and length where the cuts are taken. The corresponding position- velocity plots are shown in the middle and to the right. Arrows of the same color belong together; they are also coded by letters 'A'-'D'. The color scale are data from the H i cube and the blue con- tours are the CO data. Note that the CO at the 30 Dor region exhibits H i in absorption (start of cut 'C'). 10 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia Figure 4: CO contours of the region close to N159 overlaid as contours on an integrated H i column density map. Note that the CO peaks are close to but never coincident with nearby peaks of H i. www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 11 Figure 5: Pixel -- based scatter plots of the 12CO(1- 0) luminosity as a function of H i column density (top) and H i peak brightness (bottom). The con- tours are levels of constant point density in loga- rithmic spacings. 12 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia Figure 6: The star-forming regions N159 (left) and N113 (right) in the LMC. The contours show the integrated HCO+ emission as observed with the ATCA on top of Spitzer 8µm maps. The green lines outline the mapped regions.
0805.4289	1	0805	2008-05-28T09:03:31	V405 Aurigae: A High Magnetic Field Intermediate Polar	[ "astro-ph" ]	Our simultaneous multicolor (UBVRI) circular polarimetry has revealed nearly sinusoidal variation over the WD spin cycle, and almost symmetric positive and negative polarization excursions. Maximum amplitudes are observed in the B and V bands (+-3 %). This is the first time that polarization peaking in the blue has been discovered in an IP, and suggests that V405 Aur is the highest magnetic field IP found so far. The polarized flux spectrum is similar to those found in polars with magnetic fields in the range B ~ 25-50 MG. Our low resolution circular spectropolarimetry has given evidence of transient features which can be fitted by cyclotron harmonics n = 6, 7, and 8, at a field of B = 31.5 +- 0.8 MG, consistent with the broad-band polarized flux spectrum. Timings of the circular polarization zero crossovers put strict upper limits on WD spin period changes and indicate that the WD in V405 Aur is currently accreting closely at the spin equilibrium rate, with very long synchronization timescales, T_s > 10^9 yr. For the observed spin to orbital period ratio, P_{spin}/P_{orb} = 0.0365, and P_{orb} ~ 4.15 hr, existing numerical accretion models predict spin equilibrium condition with B ~ 30 MG if the mass ratio of the binary components is q_1 ~ 0.4. The high magnetic field makes V405 Aur a likely candidate as a progenitor of a polar.	astro-ph	astro-ph	DRAFT VERSION OCTOBER 25, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 V405 AURIGAE: A HIGH MAGNETIC FIELD INTERMEDIATE POLAR V. PIIROLA1, T. VORNANEN, & A. BERDYUGIN Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, FI-21500 Piikkiö, Finland AND G.V. COYNE, S.J. Vatican Observatory, V-00120 Città del Vaticano Draft version October 25, 2018 ABSTRACT Our simultaneous multicolor (UBV RI) circular polarimetry has revealed nearly sinusoidal variation over the WD spin cycle, and almost symmetric positive and negative polarization excursions. Maximum amplitudes are observed in the B and V bands (±3%). This is the first time that polarization peaking in the blue has been discovered in an IP, and suggests that V405 Aur is the highest magnetic field IP found so far. The polarized flux spectrum is similar to those found in polars with magnetic fields in the range B ∼ 25-50 MG. Our low resolution circular spectropolarimetry has given evidence of transient features which can be fitted by cyclotron harmonics n= 6, 7, and 8, at a field of B = 31.5 ± 0.8 MG, consistent with the broad-band polarized flux spectrum. Timings of the circular polarization zero crossovers put strict upper limits on WD spin period changes and indicate that the WD in V405 Aur is currently accreting closely at the spin equilibrium rate, with very long synchronization timescales, Ts > 109 yr. For the observed spin to orbital period ratio, Pspin/Porb=0.0365, and Porb ∼ 4.15 hr, existing numerical accretion models predict spin equilibrium condition with B ∼ 30 MG if the mass ratio of the binary components is q1 ∼ 0.4. The high magnetic field makes V405 Aur a likely candidate as a progenitor of a polar. Subject headings: stars: binaries (close) -- novae, cataclysmic variables -- stars: magnetic fields -- polariza- tion -- accretion -- stars individual: V405 Aur 1. INTRODUCTION V405 Aur (RX J0558.0+5353) was discovered in the ROSAT all-sky survey (Haberl et al. 1994) and was identified with a V ∼ 14.5 Cataclysmic Variable (CV), showing char- acteristics of an Intermediate Polar (IP): the soft X-ray flux was modulated at 272.7 s, which suggested that the system consists of a spinning magnetic white dwarf (WD) accreting matter from a cool low-mass companion. An orbital period of 4.15 h was deduced from optical spectroscopy. Further anal- ysis of the ROSAT data at energies higher than 0.7 keV re- vealed a period of 545 s, which is the true spin period of the WD, and therefore the soft X-ray light curve has a double- peaked structure (Allan et al. 1996; Evans & Hellier 2004). Evidence of two-pole accretion has been found also from op- tical spectroscopy (Still et al. 1998; Harlaftis & Horne 1999). V405 Aur belongs to a small group of IPs which are unusu- ally bright in soft X-rays, and have also been found to emit polarized radiation in the optical and/or near IR, resembling what we see in the strictly (or nearly) synchronous magnetic CVs, polars. The polarized IPs known to date are BG CMi (Penning et al. 1986; West et al. 1987), PQ Gem (Piirola et al. 1993; Rosen et al. 1993; Potter et al. 1997), V2400 Oph (Buckley et al. 1997), V405 Aur (Shakhovskoy & Kolesnikov 1997), V2306 Cyg (Uslenghi et al. 2001; Norton et al. 2002), and RX J2133.7+5107 (Katajainen et al. 2007). Of these IPs, PQ Gem was the first found to show spin-modulated circu- lar and linear polarization variations, arising from cyclotron emission from two accretion regions near the opposite mag- netic poles of the spinning WD. IPs are generally believed to have lower magnetic field (B < Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Visiting Astronomer, Vatican Observatory, V-00120 Città del Vaticano 10 MG, see e.g. Warner 1995) than polars, where the deter- mined fields range from 7 MG (V2301 Oph, Ferrario et al. 1995) to 230 MG (AR UMa, Schmidt et al. 1996). Typical values for polars are a few tens of MG (see Cropper 1990 for a review), and the magnetic field is sufficiently high to pre- vent the formation of an accretion disk. The stream of matter from the companion is coupled to the magnetic field lines and channeled via accretion columns onto the WD surface. In IPs accretion disk may exist, but is truncated at some inner ra- dius where flow to the WD takes place via accretion curtains (Rosen et al., 1988; Ferrario et al., 1993). IPs predominantly have longer orbital periods (4-5 h) than polars (typically < 2 h), though there is considerable over- lap. Close binaries lose angular momentum via gravitational radiation and magnetic wind braking, and therefore evolve towards shorter orbital periods. For sufficiently high field strengths and small binary separations the magnetic lock- ing torque will start to spin-down the WD and synchronism may be reached, the system thus becoming a polar. For IPs magnetic field measurements are difficult, but from polarized flux spectrum estimates have been made for PG Gem (8-18 MG, Piirola et al. 1993; 9-21 MG, Väth et al. 1996; Pot- ter et al. 1997), V2400 Oph (9-20 MG, Väth 1997), and RX J2133.7+5107 (& 20 MG, Katajainen et al. 2007). These val- ues are well within the range of the magnetic fields seen in polars and suggest that some of the polarized IPs may evolve into polars. So far only one of the polarized IPs, PQ Gem, has been shown to have the WD spinning down (Mason 1997). In the present paper we report extensive multicolour (UBV RI) polarimetric observations of V405 Aur, carried out in order to put constraints on the magnetic field strength of the WD and on the system geometry. These observations were complemented with low-resolution circular spectropolarime- 2 Piirola et al. try. We have also searched for possible spin period changes by a long-term monitoring of phase shifts in the circular po- larization curves. 2. OBSERVATIONS Broad-band multicolor polarimetry was carried out at the 2.5 m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) at Roque de los Muchachos Observatory on La Palma. The instrument (Tur- Pol) provides strictly simultaneous measurements in five pass- bands close to the UBV RI system, by using four dichroic fil- ters to split the light into the different spectral regions (Piirola 1988). In the circular polarimetry mode the superachromatic quarter-wave (λ/4) plate was rotated in 90◦ steps above the plane-parallel calcite plate polarizing beam splitter. For each orientation of the retarder, the two polarized beams were in- tegrated with a 25 Hz chopping frequency for a 5 s total inte- gration time each. With some dead time involved in the chop- ping procedure, the resulting time resolution is about 12 s for photometry. One circular polarization observation consists of two integrations with the λ/4 plate in orthogonal orientations, and the time resolution is correspondingly about 24 s. In the simultaneous linear and circular polarization mode the λ/4 plate was rotated in 22.5◦ steps. One complete observation of linear and circular polarization consists of eight integrations, and the time resolution is correspondingly about 1.6 minutes. A summary of the polarization observations is given in Table 1. For WD spin period timing we made circular polariza- tion observations of V405 Aur also at the 60 cm reflector of Tuorla observatory, using a newly developed CCD polarime- ter DIPOL (Piirola et al. 2005). Because of the smaller aper- ture of the telescope, the observations were done in unfiltered light. The polarimeter is equipped with a thinned back illumi- nated CCD (Marconi) which has a high blue sensitivity. The time resolution of these observations is about 1 min. Some complementary CCD-photometric observations were carried out also at the 60 cm KVA telescope on La Palma. Low resolution circular spectropolarimetry was done with the ALFOSC+FAPOL instrument at the NOT. With the grism #11 and 1.8" slit the spectral resolution was about 40Å. An achromatic λ/4 plate was rotated in 90◦ steps above the slit by the polarimetry unit (FAPOL), controlled via the ALFOSC user interface. A plane parallel calcite plate below the slit pro- duced two perpendicularly polarized spectra on the CCD. The two polarized beams passed through the collimator, grism, and the camera onto the CCD. To improve time resolution, cir- cular polarization spectra were deduced from individual 120 s exposures. Null calibration was done with the help of unpolar- ized standard stars. To check for the circular polarization sign and scale, observations of the highly polarized star Grw+70 8247 were made. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1. Multicolor photopolarimetry Figure 1 illustrates our simultaneous UBV RI circular po- larimetry. The data collected on two different nights show nearly sinusoidal and remarkably symmetric modulation, with extreme values near ±3% in the B and V , and about ±2% in the U and R bands. In the I band the modulation is smaller, about ±1%. This is the first time that polarization peaking in the blue has been detected in an IP, and suggests that V405 Aur is the highest field IP discovered so far. Its magnetic field is probably similar to what is typically found in polars (25- 50 MG). Nearly symmetric positive and negative excursions FIG. 1. -- Simultaneous UBVRI circular polarimetry of V405 Aur on 1997 Nov 27 (left) and 2003 Sep 22 (right). Phases refer to the spin period of the WD given in Eq. 2. in the circular polarization curves indicate that two opposite magnetic poles (positive and negative) are accreting at similar rate in V405 Aur. The left hand panels in Figure 1 show evidence of a small dip in circular polarization near phase 0.25, where the positive magnetic pole points closest to us. This is due to cyclotron beaming effect. Cyclotron emission intensity is at maximum in the direction perpendicular to the magnetic field, and de- creases to zero when looking along magnetic field lines. Un- polarized background radiation from thermal sources dilutes the observed degree of circular polarization when the polar- ized cyclotron flux decreases. Our simultaneous UBV RI light curves in Figure 2 show minima near the phases 0.25 and 0.75 where we are look- ing closest along the field lines, and maxima at the phases 0.0 and 0.5 where our line sight is perpendicular to the field lines, as seen from the zero-crossings of circular polariza- tion. This photometric behaviour is in accordance with the cyclotron beaming effect, i.e., maximum emission takes place in directions perpendicular to the magnetic field. Many, but not all, polars show a pulse of linear polariza- tion when our line of sight is nearly perpendicular to the field lines. We have found no evidence of any linear polarization pulse in V405 Aur. Linear polarization appears to be con- stant at the level of PB ∼ 0.36 ± 0.03%, θ ∼ 138◦± 4◦and is probably of interstellar origin. Fitting the modified Serkowski law for the wavelength dependence of interstellar polarization (Whittet et al. 1992) to the average polarization in the UBV RI bands gives maximum polarization Pmax = 0.44 ± 0.04%, at λmax = 0.56 ± 0.11µm. The zero-crossings of circular polarization give an accu- V405 Aur: A High Magnetic Field IP 3 SUMMARY OF POLARIMETRIC OBSERVATIONS TABLE 1 UT Date HJD-24450000 Passbands Telescope Instrument Mode N 1997 Nov 25 Nov 27 Nov 28 2001 Feb 04 Feb 05 2002 Jan 25 2003 Jan 10 Jan 13 Jan 16 Jan 30 Jan 31 Feb 07 Feb 19 Feb 20 Mar 23 Apr 27 Sep 20 Sep 21 Sep 22 Oct 18 2004 Feb 26 Feb 26 Feb 28 Feb 29 Mar 01 778.5566 - .6621 780.5380 - .6806 781.5224 - .6103 1945.4355 - .5224 1946.4423 - .5214 2300.3837 - .5019 2650.2704 - .3418 2653.3405 - .4482 2656.3313 - .4104 2670.3613 - .4923 2671.2289 - .3641 2678.2729 - .3721 2690.2659 - .3872 2691.2158 - .2945 2722.2757 - .3732 2757.3800 - .3950 2903.6210 - .6660 2904.6075 - .7285 2905.6025 - .7385 2931.5679 - .5967 3062.3398 - .3597 3062.3713 - .4192 3064.4495 - .4805 3065.4080 - .4176 3066.3603 - .3921 UBV RI UBV RI UBV RI UBV RI UBV RI UBV RI no filter " " " " " " " " " B " " UBV RI UBV RI UBV RI no filter spectrop. no filter NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT T-60 T-60 T-60 T-60 T-60 T-60 T-60 T-60 T-60 NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT TurPol TurPol TurPol TurPol Turpol Turpol DIPOL DIPOL DIPOL DIPOL DIPOL DIPOL DIPOL DIPOL DIPOL ALFOSC Turpol Turpol Turpol ALFOSC ALFOSC ALFOSC ALFOSC ALFOSC ALFOSC SLC SLC L SLC SLC SLC L C C C C C C C C C C C C L C C C C C 46 198 101 36 30 96 148 136 100 150 156 116 154 100 118 48 41 192 216 30 64 24 96 32 96 in light curves take place at the circular polarization zero- crossings, and our ephemeris from circular polarization is ac- curate enough to solve without ambiguity which of the two maxima corresponds to the positive cross-over of circular po- larization. Weighted second order polynomial fit to the tim- ings obtained over about 12 year interval yields a greatly im- proved ephemeris for the WD spin: T◦ = HJD 2 449 681.46389(5) + 0.0063131474(4) × E + 4(4) × 10- 16 × E2 (1) The numbers in parentheses give the error estimates in units of the last digit of the determined coefficient. No statistically significant second-order term is detected. A weighted linear fit to the timings gives the following ephemeris for the positive crossover of circular polarization: T◦ = HJD 2 449 681.46387(2) + 0.0063131476(3) × E. (2) The residuals (O-C) of the observed times of positive crossover from those predicted by the linear ephemeris are shown in Figure 3. There is no clear trend suggesting any sig- nificant higher-order terms. The rather tight limits for WD spin period changes imply very long spin-down timescales (Ts > 109 yr) for V405 Aur in its current evolutionary and accretion state. 3.2. Cyclotron model fittings Observed polarized fluxes are independent of any unpolar- ized background sources (accretion stream, disk, WD photo- sphere) and therefore very useful for comparing with exist- ing cyclotron models. Broad-band polarized flux spectrum may give rough estimates of the magnetic field in the cy- clotron emission region, as cyclotron emission intensity and polarization are characteristic to each harmonic n = ω/ωc of the fundamental cyclotron frequency ωc (see e.g. Wickra- masinghe & Meggitt 1985). The wavelength λc which cor- responds to ωc is in turn related to the magnetic field strength FIG. 2. -- Simultaneous UBVRI photometry of V405 Aur. Phases refer to the spin period of the WD given in Eq. 2. rate measure of the rotation of the WD. We have used these timings to search for possible changes in the WD spin pe- riod and evidence of spin-up or spin down. Table 2 lists our observations of the time of the positive cross-over of circular polarization. We have included in Table 2 also a few photometric timings to extend the time span. Maxima 4 Piirola et al. TABLE 2 SPIN CYCLE TIMINGS FOR V405 AUR Cycle No. HJD-24400000 O-C(d) σ(d) Filter Note 1. 1397. 2997. 13127. 14252. 14443. 16292. 16628. 16758. 16917. 173780. 173780. 173780. 173780. 173780. 173780. 173780. 173780. 174093. 174093. 174093. 174093. 174093. 174093. 174093. 174093. 358613. 358613. 358613. 358613. 358613. 358613. 358613. 358772. 358772. 414836. 414836. 414836. 414836. 470258. 470745. 471218. 473441. 473578. 474694. 476594. 476744. 481664. 487224. 510545. 510545. 510545. 510545. 510545. 510545. 510545. 510545. 510703. 510703. 510703. 510703. 510703. 510703. 510703. 510703. 535530. 535530. 535864. 536016. 536016. 536167. 702502. 49681.47030 49690.28330 49700.38450 49764.33660 49771.43890 49772.64480 49784.31760 49786.43880 49787.25960 49788.26340 50778.56263 50778.56256 50778.56254 50778.56256 50778.56285 50778.56280 50778.56282 50778.56272 50780.53873 50780.53868 50780.53861 50780.53858 50780.53866 50780.53864 50780.53861 50780.53860 51945.44078 51945.44077 51945.44080 51945.44078 51945.44069 51945.44073 51945.44072 51946.44450 51946.44458 52300.38478 52300.38479 52300.38474 52300.38476 52650.27201 52653.34659 52656.33269 52670.36694 52671.23165 52678.27720 52690.27218 52691.21913 52722.27984 52757.38082 52904.60991 52904.60991 52904.60989 52904.60985 52904.60973 52904.60979 52904.60975 52904.60979 52905.60741 52905.60736 52905.60731 52905.60728 52905.60735 52905.60734 52905.60734 52905.60733 53062.34390 53062.34373 53064.45240 53065.41211 53065.41195 53066.36538 54116.46291 0.00012 -0.00003 0.00013 0.00004 0.00005 0.00014 -0.00007 -0.00009 0.00000 0.00001 -0.00004 -0.00011 -0.00013 -0.00011 0.00018 0.00013 0.00015 0.00005 0.00005 -0.00001 -0.00007 -0.00011 -0.00003 -0.00005 -0.00007 -0.00009 0.00009 0.00008 0.00011 0.00009 0.00000 0.00004 0.00003 0.00002 0.00010 -0.00002 -0.00001 -0.00006 -0.00003 -0.00006 0.00002 0.00000 0.00013 -0.00007 0.00001 0.00001 -0.00001 0.00001 -0.00011 0.00006 0.00006 0.00004 0.00000 -0.00012 -0.00006 -0.00010 -0.00006 0.00009 0.00004 -0.00001 -0.00004 0.00003 0.00002 0.00002 0.00001 0.00006 -0.00011 -0.00003 0.00008 -0.00008 0.00006 0.00018 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00009 0.00004 0.00004 0.00007 0.00006 0.00005 0.00005 0.00008 0.00004 0.00003 0.00003 0.00004 0.00007 0.00005 0.00005 0.00006 0.00007 0.00007 0.00009 0.00002 0.00002 0.00003 0.00003 0.00010 0.00014 0.00003 0.00004 0.00002 0.00002 0.00005 0.00007 0.00004 0.00007 0.00003 0.00009 0.00004 0.00002 0.00004 0.00002 0.00003 0.00002 0.00003 0.00004 0.00003 0.00002 0.00003 0.00003 0.00002 0.00002 0.00002 0.00003 0.00002 0.00002 0.00002 0.00002 0.00005 0.00004 0.00003 0.00005 0.00005 0.00002 0.00008 no no no no no no no no no no U B V R U B V R U B V R U B V R B V R U B V R B V U B V R no no no no no no no no no no U B V U B V R I U B V U B V R I no no no no no no no 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 5 6 5 5 6 5 7 NOTE. -- (1) Photometry from Allan et al. 1996, (2) UBV RI polarimetry at the NOT, (3) UBV RI photometry at the NOT (4) CCD polarimetry at T-60, (5) CCD polarimetry at the NOT, (6) CCD photometry at the NOT, (7) CCD photometry at the KVA-60 V405 Aur: A High Magnetic Field IP 5 i, of the WD spin axis and the colatitude, β, of the cyclotron emission region(s). This adds further uncertainty in the mod- eling of the cyclotron flux spectrum (Figure 4), which is de- pendent on the angle between our line of sight and the mag- netic field. The symmetric shape of the circular polarization curves over the WD spin period (Figure 1) requires that β is large. This was noted already by Shakhovskoy & Kolesnikov (1997), who suggested a nearly equatorial magnetic field in V405 Aur. The small dip at the circular polarization maximum (Fig- ure 1, left panel) indicates that when the emission region is pointing closest to us the viewing angle, α, reaches a value where the beaming effect starts to reduce cyclotron flux, but does not yet drop it substantially. Less clear evidence of a beaming effect is seen on the right hand panel of Figure 1 sug- gesting that probably the emission region had moved slightly towards larger α values, and consequently the observed cy- clotron emission was less influenced by the beaming effect on that night. With the above constraints from circular polarization curves, we have tried to reproduce the observed polarization and light curves of V405 Aur with a geometric model involv- ing extended emission strips on the WD surface. We have applied the viewing angle dependence of the cyclotron flux polarization and intensity from Wickramasinghe & Meggitt (1985), as done in the earlier work by Piirola et al. (1990, 1993, 1994), where the models are also explained in more detail. The minimum total flux determined from each of the UBV RI light curves was adopted as the wavelength depen- dent unpolarized background flux in the model computations. This is a good approximation as the relative amount of cy- clotron emission in the total observed flux is small in V405 Aur. Centered, or slightly de-centered, dipole field was as- sumed for computing the direction of field lines relative to the normal to the WD surface for the emission arcs located off from the magnetic poles. The nearly symmetric rising and descending parts of the circular polarization curves suggest that the tilt of magnetic field lines with respect to the normal to the WD in the emis- sion region is not large in the direction of longitude, i.e., the cyclotron region is not located far from the magnetic pole in that direction. Such accretion geometry may be favored in spin equilibrium case. In contrast, for PQ Gem Potter et al. (1997) have found the cyclotron arc located ahead of the mag- netic pole in longitude, which is consistent with the spin-down of the WD in this system. Estimates from X-ray spectral fits (Evans & Hellier 2004) give rather small values of the black- body emitting area (< 0.001 of the WD surface) associated with the accretion region. Hence, we assume relatively nar- row cyclotron emission arcs in our model. The main features of the circular polarization and light curves can be reproduced reasonably well (Figures 5 and 6), but the cyclotron flux from the constant temperature models drops too much when moving away from the wavelength of the peak polarized flux. Hence, the amplitude of the circu- lar polarization and intensity variations becomes too small for the U and I bands (top and bottom panels, respectively). Also the beaming effect, the dip of polarization at phases 0.25 and 0.75, becomes too pronounced at high harmonics. Producing a broader cyclotron flux spectrum would require inhomoge- neous emission regions with spread in the physical parame- ters, the electron density, temperature, and the magnetic field. Such modeling is, however, beyond the scope of the present paper. FIG. 3. -- Spin cycle timings of V405 Aur. Residuals from the weighted linear fit (Eq. 2) are plotted vs. cycle number. Different symbols denote photometry (◦) and polarimetry (+). FIG. 4. -- Observed peak circularly polarized fluxes of V405 Aur, com- pared with those deduced from existing cyclotron models. The solid line corresponds to the extended emission region model (Wickramasinghe et al. 1991) with a field of 26 MG and average view angle ∼60◦. Dot-dashed and dashed lines give fluxes from the 20 kEV constant temperature, Λ = 106, model (Wickramasinghe & Meggitt 1985) for viewing angles α = 70◦ and 50◦. by λc ∼ 108µm/B[MG]. The method has been applied to the polarized IPs PQ Gem (Piirola et al. 1993; Väth et al. 1996; Potter et al. 1997) and V2400 Oph (Väth 1997) and the sug- gested field strengths are in the range 8-20 MG in both of these objects. Polarized flux spectrum is strongly dependent on the pa- rameters of the adopted cyclotron model and the system ge- ometry and this limits the usefulness of the method. How- ever, it may be the only way of getting any magnetic field estimates at all for IPs which do not show measurable cy- clotron harmonic features or photospheric Zeeman features in their spectra, because of the overlaying strong disk and stream emission. Figure 4 gives the peak circularly polarized fluxes in the UBV RI bands, computed from the data displayed in Figures 1 and 2, compared with those deduced from existing cyclotron models. With constant temperature Λ = 106 models (Wick- ramasinghe & Meggitt 1985) the polarized flux distribution is too narrow (dashed and dotted lines). Broader distribution and better fit is obtained for extended ribbon-like accretion shocks model of Wickramasinghe, Wu, & Ferrario (1991), where al- lowance is made for field spread and for the change in shock height as a function of specific accretion rate. The fit shown in Figure 4 (solid line) corresponds to a field of B ∼ 26 MG. Without measurable linear polarization from the cyclotron source it is not possible to put strict constraints on the geo- metric model, which is defined basically by the inclination, 6 Piirola et al. FIG. 5. -- Examples of simulated circular polarization curves for i = 38◦ and two nearly equatorial cyclotron emission regions extended by ∆λ = 24◦ in longitude and confined between colatitudes β1 = 80-92◦and β2 = 76-88◦ for the positive and negative regions, respectively. Each of the emission re- gions has been divided into four equidistant strips with 4◦ intervals in β for the modeling shown in the left panel. The right hand panel displays curves from the accretion model shown in Figs. 7 and 8, compared with the circular polarization normal points of 2003 Sep 22 in the UBV RI bands (from top to bottom). The results from our computations shown in Figures 5 and 6 support the earlier suggestion by Shakhovskoy & Kolesnikov (1997) that the magnetic dipole axis is nearly equatorial in V405 Aur (Figures 7 and 8). With such a large value of the colatitude, β ∼ 90◦ , best fits to our circular polarization and light curves are obtained with the WD spin axis inclination in the range i ∼ 30-50◦. To put better constraints on the system geometry of V405 Aur, further efforts to establish possible variability of the linear polarization (P, θ) would be required. 3.3. Comparison with X-ray data Soft X-rays in polarized IPs are dominated by blackbody emission from the heated WD surface near the accretion shock. The double-peaked structure of the soft X-ray light curve in V405 Aur indicates that both accretion regions con- tribute. The equality of the two maxima requires that the angle between the magnetic and spin axes is high (Evans & Hellier 2004), as also suggested earlier by the circular polarization curve (Shakhovskoy & Kolesnikov 1997) and our modeling in the present paper (Sect 3.2). The details of the geometric model of Evans & Hellier (2004) from X-ray data are not fully supported by the circular FIG. 6. -- Simulated light curves for the same models as in Figure 5, com- pared with the light curves from 2003 Sep 22 in the UBV RI bands (dots, from top to bottom). polarization curves. With their values of spin and magnetic axis inclination (i=65◦ and β1=60◦) the upper magnetic pole passes near the center of the visible disk of the WD when pointing closest to us, and the corresponding viewing angles, α ∼ 0◦ would give prominent cyclotron beaming effects: cir- cular polarization would drop to zero in all wavebands. Our circular polarization curves (Figure 1) show only minor de- pressions at phases 0.25 and 0.75 in the U band and marginal evidence in the B and V bands, suggesting that the viewing angle, α > 40◦ throughout the spin cycle. The symmetric po- larization and light curves require the two accretion regions be nearly at the same latitude. For nearly centered dipole this means nearly equatorial magnetic field. More exotic possi- ble configurations might be a grossly de-centered (in latitude) dipole, or quadrupole field with one positive and one negative pole visible (for parts of the spin cycle) and nearly at the same latitude. Our improved ephemeris (Eq. 2) allows us to phase some of the published X-ray curves with our (UBV RI) circular po- larization and light curves. In hard X-rays V405 Aur shows a single peak, and the epoch of the maximum given by de Martino et al. (2004), HJDmax = 2 450 364.159695, occurs at the phase 0.74 of our ephemeris. This is very near the phase (0.75) where the negative magnetic pole is pointing closest to us, and means that this pole is seen brighter in hard X- rays. Evans & Hellier (2004) define phase zero of their XMM- V405 Aur: A High Magnetic Field IP 7 FIG. 7. -- Illustration of the model used to compute the circular polarization and light curves shown in Figs. 5 and 6. The spinning WD is seen at inclination i=38◦ and the magnetic dipole angle is β=82◦. Positive magnetic pole points closest to us at the phase Φ ∼0.25 and negative pole at Φ ∼0.75. Brighter light curve maximum takes place at Φ ∼ 0.0 and another maximum at Φ ∼ 0.5. Cyclotron emission arcs and the dipole axis are drawn with thick lines. The emission arcs are off from the magnetic poles by ∆β1=-3◦ and ∆β2=+4◦ for the positive and negative pole, respectively. The centers of the 24◦ long emission arcs are ahead of the poles in longitude by ∆λ1=5◦ and ∆λ2=1◦ . The accretion model geometry is shown in Fig. 8. FIG. 8. -- Side-on schematic view of the accretion model, shown for i=38◦ and magnetic dipole angle β=82◦. The dipole is decentered by 0.1RW D towards the upper rotational pole. Arrows give viewing directions at phases 0.25 and 0.75. For a larger inner radius of the disc the accreting field lines hit the WD surface closer to the magnetic poles. 8 Piirola et al. Newton data as the peak of the larger of the soft X-ray max- ima, which corresponds to HJD 2 452 187.55904. With our ephemeris this takes place at the phase 0.44, which is near the second maximum in the optical light curves (phase 0.5), where we look nearly perpendicular to the magnetic field. This would be in accordance with the standard accretion cur- tain model (see e.g. Hellier et al. 1991), where the opacity of the column causes X-rays to emerge preferentially perpendic- ular to the curtain, and argues against the other plausible ex- planation that foreshortening of the accretion polecaps when viewed face on and near the limb of the WD would be the dominating effect on the soft X-ray flux observed in V405 Aur. However, neither de Martino et al. (2004) nor Evans & Hellier (2004) found the absorption dip expected from the accretion-curtain dip model, and the soft X-ray behaviour of V405 Aur vs. the magnetic phase requires further attention. 3.4. Spectropolarimetry If cyclotron harmonics are detected in the spectrum, they provide an accurate method for determining the magnetic field strength in the emission region. However, thermal broadening effects and magnetic field spread in an inhomogeneous region may smear out the harmonics and make them undetectable. Also the overlying emission from other than the cyclotron source need to be carefully modeled and removed (see e.g. Cropper et al. 1988). Because of these complications, cy- clotron harmonic humps have not been seen in many of the known polars, and even if detected are visible only at some phase angle intervals during the WD spin cycle. In V405 Aur the bright thermal emission from the disk and the accretion stream dilute the cyclotron flux at least by an order of magnitude when compared with strongly polarized polars which have Pc ∼ 20-40%. This makes the detection of cyclotron humps in the intensity spectrum of V405 Aur unlikely. Therefore, we have carried out circular spectropo- larimetry with the aim to search for cyclotron harmonics in the polarized flux spectra, where the effects from thermal emis- sion sources are largely eliminated. Most of the polarized spectra we obtained show no clear cy- clotron harmonic pattern. However, at some phase angles of the WD spin period we see transient structures which suggest a possible cyclotron origin. A single 120 s exposure of the spectrum of the negative emission region in Figure 9 shows three peaks (downwards), the inverse wavelengths of which can be fitted with cyclotron harmonics n = 6, 7, and 8, at magnetic field of B = 31.5±0.8 MG. If confirmed, this would make V405 Aur the first IP with a direct measurement of mag- netic field, and the value found is typical of that of polars. 3.5. Is V405 Aur a progenitor of a polar? The broad-band (UBV RI) circular polarization wavelength dependence (Fig. 1) is similar to what is seen in moderately high-field polars (B ∼ 25-50MG), such as VV Pup (Piirola et al. 1990; Schwope & Beuermann 1997) and V834 Cen (Piirola 1995; Ferrario et al. 1992). Our magnetic field es- timates for V405 Aur from the polarized flux spectrum (B ∼ 25 MG, Sect. 3.2) and spectropolarimetry (B ∼30 MG, Sect. 3.4) are in accordance with the values determined for those polars from cyclotron humps or Zeeman spectroscopy. This makes V405 Aur a likely candidate as a progenitor of a polar. Using a numerical model of magnetic accretion, Norton et al. (2004) have predicted that IPs with magnetic moments µ1 ≥ 5 × 1033 G cm3 and Porb > 3 hr will evolve into polars. FIG. 9. -- Circular spectropolarimetry of V405 Aur on 2004 Feb 26. The negative circular polarization spectrum (120 s exposure, top panel) shows features which can be fitted on the 1/λ scale with cyclotron harmonics n = 6, 7, and 8 from a field of B = 31.5±0.8 MG. The degree of circular polarization has been corrected for the diluting unpolarized flux from the emission lines and smoothed with a ∆λ ∼ 70 Å wide window filtering. The bottom panel gives a raw intensity spectrum (ADU). For a solar-mass WD a surface field of B = 30 MG corre- sponds to µ1 ∼ 5 × 1033 G cm3, which gives further support that V405 Aur may evolve into a polar. The ratio of the spin to the orbital period Pspin/Porb = 0.0365 indicates that V405 Aur is still far from synchronism. Our spin period analysis (Fig. 3 and Eqs. 1-2) gives Pspin which is constant within tight limits, and the corresponding spin-down timescales are very long (Ts > 109 yr). Therefore, V405 Aur is currently accreting closely at the spin equilibrium rate. For small Pspin/Porb values this condition occurs in disk-like ac- cretion (Norton et al. 2004, 2008). The angular momentum gain from accretion onto the WD balances the magnetic brak- ing torque, and equilibrium is reached. In Figure 10 we show the location of V405 Aur in the Pspin vs. magnetic moment, µ1, diagram from Norton et al. (2008) for Porb = 4 hr, and three different mass ratios, q=0.2, 0.5, and 0.9. The inferred magnetic field strength depends strongly on the value of q. For the value of Pspin/Porb = 0.0365 these nu- merical model computations predict a field B = 20 MG for q = 0.5 and the spin equilibrium condition, defined in these graphs by the boundary line between the D (disk) and P (propeller), or the S (stream) and P (propeller) type accretion. Lower q implies larger B (60 MG for q = 0.2). B=30 MG would be ob- tained for q ∼ 0.4 from these models, assuming a solar mass WD in the conversion of µ1 to the surface field. Because of the angular momentum loss via gravitational radiation and magnetic wind braking, V405 Aur will evolve towards shorter orbital period and smaller binary separation, a. It is expected that when small enough a is reached, the magnetic braking torque will overcome the spin-up accretion torque and the WD will start to spin-down towards synchro- nization, the system thereby becoming a polar. 4. CONCLUSIONS Our simultaneous multicolor (UBV RI) circular polarimetry of the intermediate polar V405 Aur has revealed polarization which peaks in the B and V passbands, similar to relatively high field (B = 25 - 50 MG) polars. This is the first time that a polarized flux spectrum reaching maximum at such short wavelengths has been found in an IP, and suggests that V405 Aur is the highest field IP found so far. We have also detected transient features in circularly polarized spectra which can be V405 Aur: A High Magnetic Field IP 9 FIG. 10. -- The location of V405 Aur in the Pspin/Porb vs. magnetic moment µ1 diagram from Norton et al. (2008) for Porb = 4 hr and mass ratios q = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.9. Spin equilibrium condition predicted by the numerical model is defined in these graphs by the boundary line between the D (disk) and P (propeller), or the S (stream) and P (propeller) type accretion. The respective surface magnetic field values (MG) correspond to a solar-mass WD. fitted on the wavenumber scale with cyclotron harmonics n=6, 7, and 8, at a magnetic field of B = 31.5 ± 0.8 MG. Such a field is consistent with the broad-band polarized flux spectrum observed, and this makes V405 Aur a likely candidate of a progenitor of a polar. Nearly sinusoidal and symmetric positive and negative cir- cular polarization excursions in all of the UBV RI passbands indicate that the two opposite magnetic poles are accreting at very similar rate, and are located far from the rotational poles, probably near the equator. For such a magnetic geom- etry, our numerical model simulations suggest WD spin axis inclination, i = 30-50◦. The broad-band circular polarization spectrum is flatter than predicted by constant temperature cy- clotron models, and requires an inhomogeneous emission re- gion with a spread of the physical parameters (temperature, electron density, magnetic field) and possibly a complicated geometry. Period analysis from timings of the zero-crossover of cir- cular polarization puts strict constraints on the WD spin pe- riod changes. The respective spin-down timescales are very long, Ts > 109 yr, which means that the WD in V405Aur is currently accreting very closely at the spin equilibrium rate. With the spin to orbital period ratio, Pspin/Porb = 0.0365, such a condition is achieved in disk-type accretion where the angu- lar momentum gain from matter transferred onto the WD via the disk balances the magnetic braking torque. Comparison with numerical accretion model computations (Norton et al. 2008) shows that for V405 Aur equilibrium condition would be obtained with mass ratio q1 ∼ 0.4, if the magnetic field is B ∼ 30 MG. The Nordic Optical Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Nor- way, and Sweden, in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos (ORM) of the Instituto de Astrophysica de Canarias. The KVA-60 telescope is operated by Tuorla Observatory of the University of Turku, at ORM under the agreement between the University of Turku, Finland, and the Royal Academy of Sciences, Sweden (Kungliga Vetenskap- sakademien). REFERENCES Allan, A., Horne, K., Hellier, C., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 1345 Buckley, D.A., Haberl, F., Motch, C., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 287, 117 Cropper, M. 1990, Space Science Reviews, 54, 195 Cropper, M., Mason, K.O., Allington-Smith, J.R., et al. 1988, MNRAS, 236, 29P de Martino, D., Matt, G., Belloni, T., et al. 2004, A&A, 415, 1009 Evans, P.A., & Hellier, C. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 447 Ferrario, L, Wickramasinghe, D.T., Bailey, J., et al. 1992, MNRAS, 256, 252 Ferrario, L., Wickramasinghe, D.T., Bailey, J., & Buckley, D. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 17 Ferrario, L., Wickramasinghe, D.T., & King, A.R. 1993, MNRAS260, 149 Haberl, F., Thorstensen, J.R., Motch, C., et al. 1994, A&A, 291, 171 Harlaftis, E.T., & Horne, K. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 437 Hellier, C., Cropper, M., & Mason, K. 1991, MNRAS, 248, 233 Katajainen, S., Butters, O.W., Norton, A.J., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, 1011 Mason, K.O. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 493 Norton, A.J., Quaintrell, H., Katajainen, S., et al. 2002, A&A, 384, 195 Norton, A.J., Wynn, G.A., & Somerscales, R.V. 2004, ApJ, 614, 349 Norton, A.J., Butters, O.W., Parker, T.L., & Wynn, G.A. 2008, ApJ, 672, 524 Penning, W.R., Schmidt, G.D., & Liebert, J. 1986, ApJ, 301, 881 Piirola, V. 1988, in 'Polarized Radiation of Circumstellar Origin', eds. G.V. Coyne et al. (Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press), 735 Piirola, V. 1995, in ASP Conf. Ser. 85: Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables, ed. D.A.H. Buckley & B. Warner, 31 Piirola, V., Berdyugin, A., Mikkola, V., & Coyne, G.V. 2005, ApJ, 632, 576 Piirola, V., Coyne, G.V., & Reiz, A. 1990, A&A, 235, 245 Piirola, V., Coyne, G.V., Takalo, L., et al. 1994, A&A, 283, 163 Piirola, V., Hakala, P., & Coyne, G.V. 1993, ApJ, 410, L107 Potter, S.B., Cropper, M., Mason, K.O., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 82 Rosen, S.R., Mason, K.O., & Cordova, F.A., 1988, MNRAS, 231, 549 Rosen, S.R., Mittaz, J.P.D., & Hakala, P. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 171 Schwope, A.D., & Beuermann, K. 1997, Astron. Nachr., 318, 111 Schmidt, G.D., Szkody, P., Smith, P.S., et al. 1996, ApJ, 473, 483 Shakhovskoy, N.M., & Kolesnikov, S.V. 1997, IAU Circ. 6760, 2 Still, M., Duck, S.R., & Marsh, T.R. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 759 Uslenghi, M., Tommasi, L., Treves, A., Piirola, V., & Reig, P. 2001, A&A, Väth, H. 1997, A&A, 317, 476 Väth, H., Chanmugan, G., & Frank, J. 1996, ApJ, 457, 407 Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge University Press), 372, L1 572 West, S.C., Berriman, G., & Schmidt, G.D. 1987, ApJ, 322, L35 Whittet, D.C.B., Martin, B.G., Hough, J.H., et al. 1992, ApJ, 386, 562 Wickramasinghe, D.T. & Meggitt, S.M.A. 1985, MNRAS, 214, 605 Wickramasinghe, D.T., Wu, K., & Ferrario, L. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 460
astro-ph/0403619	1	0403	2004-03-26T17:45:52	Gravitational microlensing and dark matter problem in our Galaxy: 10 years later	[ "astro-ph" ]	Foundations of standard theory of microlensing are described, namely we consider microlensing stars in Galactic bulge, the Magellanic Clouds or other nearby galaxies. We suppose that gravitational microlenses lie between an Earth observer and these stars. Criteria of an identification of microlensing events are discussed. We also consider such microlensing events which do not satisfy these criteria (non-symmetrical light curves, chromatic effects, polarization effects). We describe results of MACHO collaboration observations towards the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and the Galactic bulge. Results of EROS observations towards the LMC and OGLE observations towards the Galactic bulge are also presented. Future microlensing searches are discussed.	astro-ph	astro-ph	GRAVITATIONAL MICROLENSING AND DARK MATTER IN OUR GALAXY: 10 YEARS LATER Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 117259, B. Cheremushkinskaya, A.F. ZAKHAROVa 25, Moscow, Russia Astro Space Centre of Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia Abstract. Foundations of standard theory of microlensing are described, namely we consider microlensing stars in Galactic bulge, the Magellanic Clouds or other nearby galaxies. We suppose that gravitational microlenses lie between an Earth observer and these stars. Criteria of an identification of microlensing events are discussed. We also consider such microlensing events which do not satisfy these criteria (non-symmetrical light curves, chromatic effects, polarization effects). We describe results of MACHO collaboration observations towards the Large Magel- lanic Cloud (LMC) and the Galactic bulge. Results of EROS observations towards the LMC and OGLE observations towards the Galactic bulge are also presented. Future microlensing searches are discussed. A standard microlens model is based on a simple approximation of a point mass for a gravitational microlens. Gravitational lensing (gravitational fo- cusing) results from the effect of light bending by a gravitating body (the phenomenon was discussed by I. Newton, but in the framework of Newto- nian gravity a formal derivation of the light bending angle was published by J. Soldner [1]). In the framework of general relativity (GR) using a weak gravitational field approximation the correct bending angle is described by the following expres- sion derived by Einstein in 1915 just after his formulation of GR δϕ = − 4GM∗ c2p . (1) The derivation of the famous Einstein's formulae for the bending angle of light rays in gravitational field of a point mass M∗ is practically in all monographs and textbooks on general relativity and gravity theory (see, for example books [2, 3]). The law was firstly confirmed by Sir A. Eddington for observations of light ray bend by the Solar gravitational field near its surface. The angle is equal to 1.75′′, therefore Einstein prediction was confirmed by observations very soon after its discovery. The gravitational lens effect is a formation of several images instead of one (see details in [4,5]). We have two images for a point lens model (Schwarzschild lens model). The total square of the two images is larger than a source square. The ratio of these two squares is called gravitational lens amplification A. That is a reason to call gravitational lensing as gravitational focusing. The angular distance between two images is about angular size of so-called Einstein's cone. ae-mail: [email protected] The angular size of Einstein's cone is proportional to the lens mass divided by the distance between a lens and an observer. Therefore, if we consider a gravi- tational lens with typical galactic mass and a typical galactic distance between a gravitational lens and an observer then the angular distance between images will be about few angular seconds; if we suppose that a gravitational lens has a solar mass and a distance between the lens and an observer is about sev- eral kiloparsecs then an angular distance between images will be about angular millisecond. If a separation angle is ∼ 1′′, then one may observe two images in optical band although this problem is a complex one, but one cannot observe directly two images by Earth's observer in the optical band if a separation angle is ∼ 0.001′′. Therefore, the microlensing effect is observed on changing of a luminosity of a source S.b If the source S lies on the boundary of the Einstein cone, then we have A = 1.34. Note, that the total time of crossing the Einstein cone is T0. Sometimes the microlensing time is defined as a half of T0 we suppose that Dd < Dds (here we assume that Dds is the distance from the source S to the lens D; Dd is the distance from the lens D to the observer O; Ds is the distance from the source S to the observer O) T0 = 3.5 months ·s M M⊙ Dd 10 kpc · 300 km/s v , where v is the perpendicular component of a velocity of a dark body. If we suppose that the perpendicular component of a velocity of a dark body is equal to ∼ 300 km/s (that is a typical stellar velocity in Galaxy), then a typical time of crossing Einstein cone is about 3.5 months. Thus, a luminosity of a source S is changed with the time. We will give numerical estimations for parameters of the microlensing effect. If the distance between a dark body and the Sun is equal to ∼ 10 kpc, then the angular size of Einstein cone of the dark body with a solar mass is equal to ∼ 0.001′′ or the linear size of Einstein cone is equal to about 10 astronomical units. It is clear that since typical distances between two images are about Einstein diameters therefore is very difficult to resolve the images by ground based telescopes at least in an optical band. It was a reason that both Einstein and Chwolson thought if gravitational lenses and sources are stars then sepa- ration angle is very small to be detectable. However, recently, a direct method to measure Einstein angle φE was proposed to resolve double images generated by microlensing with an optical interferometer (say VLTI) [6](see also [7] for a bSince the angle is very small Einstein and Chwolson thought that gravitational lens effect could not be detectable if sources and lenses are stars. Now there are chances to measure such angles in IR band therefore there is a giant development of observational facilities. discussion). Moreover, it is plan to launch astrometrical space probe, Ameri- can SIMc and European GAIAd, these instruments will have precisions about 10 micro arc seconds and could determine Einstein radii for any microlensing events. Astrometric microlensing or motions of visible images due to influence of a gravitational field of microlenses was analyzed in number of papers [8 -- 19], although light bending in gravitational field was discussed by I. Newton (actu- ally that is the same effect but authors presented detailed analysis and pushed new ideas to use the phenomenon to detect even invisible astronomical objects by shifts of images for background sources). An optical depth of microlensing for distant quasars was discussed for different locations of microlenses (see, for example, [20] and references therein. For observations of extragalactic gravitational lens a typical time for changes of light curve is very long (∼ 105 years) for its direct observations. Therefore, extragalactic gravitational lenses are discovered and observed by resolving dif- ferent optical components (images) since typical angular distances between images are about some angular seconds because of a great mass of a gravita- tional lens. If a gravitational lens is a galaxy cluster then the angular distances between images may be about several minutes. For an identification of gravita- tional lenses, observers compare typical features and spectra of different images. It is clear that one cannot to resolve different components during microlensing but it is possible to get and analyze a light curve in different spectral bands. One of the basic criterion for microlensing event identification is the symme- try of a light curve. If we consider a spherically symmetric gravitational field of a lens, a point source and a short duration of microlensing event then the statement about the symmetry of a light curve will be a strong mathematical conclusion, but if we consider a more complicated distribution of a gravitational field lens or an extensive light source then some deviations of symmetric light curves may be observed and (or) the microlensing effect may be chromatic [4,5]. More than 70 years ago it was found that densities of visible matter is about 10% of total density in galactic halos (the invisible is called as dark matter (DM) [21, 22])e Thus baryonic density is a small fraction of total density of the Universe. Probably galactic halos is "natural" places to store not only baryonic DM, but non-baryonic DM also. If DM forms objects with masses in the range [10−5, 10]M⊙ microlensing could help to detect such objects. Thus, before intensive microlensing searches it was a dream that microlensing investigations could help us to solve DM problem for Galactic halo at least. For the first time a possibility to discover microlensing using observations of chttp://sim.jpl.nasa.gov/whatis/ dhttp://astro.estec.esa.nl/GAIA eNow it is known that the matter density (in critical density units) is Ωm = 0.3 (including baryonic matter Ωb ≈ 0.05 − 0.04, but luminous matter Ωlum ≈ 0.001), Λ-term density ΩΛ = 0.7. star light curves was discussed in the paper by Byalko in 1969 [23]. Systematic searches of dark matter using typical variations of light curves of individual stars from millions observable stars started after Paczynski's discussion of the halo dark matter discovery using monitoring stars from Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) [24]. We remark that in the beginning of the nineties new computer and technical possibilities providing the storage and processing of huge volume of observational data were appeared and it promoted at the rapid realization of Paczynski's proposal. Griest suggested to call the microlenses as Machos (Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo Objects) [25]. Besides, MACHO is the name of the project of observations of the US-English-Australian collaboration which observed the LMC and Galactic bulge using 1.3 m telescope of Mount Stromlo observatory in Australia.f The first papers about the microlensing discovery were published by the MACHO collaboration [26] and the French collaboration EROS (Exp´erience de Recherche d'Objets Sombres) [27].g First papers about the microlensing discovery toward Galactic bulge were published by US-Polish collaboration (Optical Gravitational Lens Experiment), which used 1.3 m telescope at Las Campanas Observatory. Since June 2001, after second major hardware upgrade OGLE entered into its third phase, OGLE III as a result the collaboration observes more than 200 millions stars observed regularly once every 1 -- 3 nights. Last two years OGLE III detected more than four hundreds microlensing event candidates each year [29].h MOA (Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics) is collaboration involving astronomers from Japan and New Zealand [30, 31].i To investigate Macho distribution in another direction one could use searches toward M31 (Andromeda) Galaxy lying at 725 kpc (it is the closest galaxy for an observer in the Northern hemisphere). In nineties two collaborations AGAPE (Andromeda Gravitational Amplification Pixel Experiment, Pic du Midi, France)j and VATT started to monitor pixels instead of individual stars [28, 33]. These teams reported about discoveries of several microlensing event candidates. The event corresponding to microlensing may be characterized by the fol- lowing main features, which allow to distinguish the microlensing event and a stellar variability [4, 34, 35]. • Since the microlensing events have a very small probability, the events f MACHO stopped since end 1999. gEROS experiment stopped in 2002 [28]. hhttp://www.astrouw.edu.pl/ ogle/ogle3/ews/ews/html ihttp://www/roe.ac.uk/%7Eiab/alert/alert/alert/html jNew collaboration, POINT-AGAPE started in 1999 and uses INT (2.5 v Isaac Newton Telescope) [54]. should never repeat for the same star. The stellar variability is connected usually with periodic (or quasi-periodic) events of the fixed star. • In the framework of a simple model of microlensing when a point source is considered, the microlensing effect must be achromatic (deviations from achromaticity for non-point source were considered, for example in the paper by Bogdanov & Cherepashchuk [36]), but the proper change of luminosity star is connected usually with the temperature changes and thus the light curve depends on a colour. • The light curves of microlensing events are symmetric, but the light curves of variable stars are usually asymmetric (often they demonstrate the rapid growth before the peak and the slow decrease after the peak of a lumi- nosity). • Observations of microlensing events are interpreted quite well by the sim- ple theoretical model, but some microlensing events are interpreted by more complicated model in which one can take into account that a source (or a microlens) is a binary system, a source has non-vanishing size, the parallax effect may take place. The typical features of the light curve of the first microlensing event observed by the MACHO collaboration in the LMC are shown in Fig. 1, where the light curves are shown for two spectral bands (a more recent MACHO fit to the observed amplification of this event gives Amax = 7.2). The light curve (in two bands) is fitted by the simple model well enough, but the ratio of luminosities for the bands is shown in the lower panel of figure (the ratio shape is adjusted with the event achromaticity). However, one can note that near the maximal observable luminosity the theoretical curve fits the data of observations not very well. Now one can carry out accurate testing the achromaticity and moreover the stability of the source spectrum during a microlensing event with the Early Warning systems implemented both by the MACHO and OGLE collaborations. This allows one to study the source properties using large telescopes and to organize intense follow-up studies of light curves using telescope network around the globe. In addition to the typical properties of individual microlensing events, Roulet and Mollerach note that the population of observed events should have the following statistical properties [4, 34]. • Unlike a star variability microlensing events should happen with the same probability for any kind of star therefore the distribution of microlensing Figure 1: The first microlensing event which was detected by the MACHO collaboration during microlensing searches towards LMC [26]. events should correspond to the distribution of observed stars in the color- magnitude diagrams.k • The distribution of the maximal amplification factor Amax should cor- respond to a uniform distribution of the variable umin = 1/b (b is the dimensionless impact parameter). • The distributions of the amplification Amax and the microlensing event time T should be uncorrelated. Since for the microlens searches one can monitor several million stars for several years, the ongoing searches have focused on two targets: a) stars in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) which are the nearest galaxies having lines of sight which go out of the Galactic plane and well across kHowever, Roulet and Mollerach noted that for observations in the bulge since observed stars have non-negligible spread along the line of sight, the optical depth is significantly larger for the star lying behind the bulge, thus the lensing probabilities should increase for the fainter stars [34]. the halo; b) stars in the Galactic bulge which allow to test the distribution of lenses near to the Galactic plane.l Let us cite well established results of microlensing searches and discuss the questions for which we have now different answers which do not contradict to the observational data. Now it is generally recognized that the microlensing searches towards the Galactic bulge or nearby galaxies are very important for solutions of a lot of problems in astronomy and cosmology. As Paczynski noted, the most important is the consensus that the microlensing phenomenon has been discovered [37]. Now it is impossible to tell which part of the microlensing event candidates is actually connected with the effect since probably there are some variable stars among the event candidates, it could be stellar variability of an unknown kind.m 1. Observed light curves are achromatic and their shapes are interpreted by simple theoretical expressions very well, however, there is not com- plete consent about "very well interpretation" since even for the event candidate MACHO # 1 the authors of the discovery proposed two fits. Dominik and Hirshfeld suggested that the event could be fitted perfectly in the framework of the binary lens model [38, 39], but Gurevich et al. assumed that the microlensing event candidate could be caused by a non- compact microlens [40].n 2. As expected, binary lenses have been detected and the observed rate of the events correspond to expected value. 3. As expected, the parallax effect has been detected. 4. Since the observed optical depth is essentially greater than the estimated value, the independent confirmation of the Galactic bar existence was done. 5. Using photometric observations of the caustic-crossing binary lens mi- crolensing event EROS BLG-2000-5, PLANET collaboration reported about the first microlens mass determination, namely the masses of these components are 0.35 M⊙ and 0.262 M⊙ and the lens lies within 2.6 kpc of the Sun [47]. 6. Bennett et al. discovered gravitational microlensing events due to stel- lar mass black holes [48]. The lenses for events MACHO-96-BLG-5 and MACHO-96-BLG-6 are the most massive, with mass estimates M/M⊙ = 6+10 −3 and M/M⊙ = 6+7 −3, respectively. lIn this paper we do not discuss microlensing for distant quasars. mThe microlensing event candidates proposed early by the EROS collaboration ( #1 and #2) and by the MACHO collaboration (#2 and #3) are considered now as the evidence of a stellar variability [37]. nMicrolensing by non-compact objects considered also in papers [41 -- 46]. Now the following results are generally accepted: 1. The optical depth towards the Galactic bulge is equal to ∼ 3 × 10−6, so it is larger than the estimated value [49]. 2. Analysis of 5.7 years of photometry on 11.9 million stars in LMC by MA- CHO collaboration reveals 13 -- 17 microlensing events [50] (recent results of the MACHO collaboration on could find in [51]). The optical depth towards the LMC is equal to τ (2 < t < 400 days) = 1.2+0.4 × 10−7, so, −0.3 it is smaller than the estimated value. The maximum likelihood analysis gives a MACHO halo fraction f=0.2. Alcock et al. (2000b) gives also estimates of the following probabilities P (0.08 < f < 0.5) = 0.95 and P (f = 1) < 0.05. The most likely MACHO mass M ∈ [0.15, 0.9]M⊙, depending on the halo model and total mass in MACHOs out 50 kpc is found to be 9+4 × 1010M⊙ EROS collaboration gives a consistent con- clusion, namely, this group estimates the following probability P (M ∈ [10−7, 1]M⊙ & f > 0.4) < 0.05 [52, 53]. However, these conclusions are based on assumptions about mass and spacial distributions of microlenses but generally speaking these distributions are still unknown. −3 However there are different suggestions (which are not contradicted to the observational data) about the following issues [37]: What is the location of objects which dominate microlensing observed towards the Galactic bulge? Where are the most microlenses for searches towards LMC? The microlenses may be in the Galactic disk, Galactic halo, the LMC halo or in the LMC itself. Are the microlenses stellar mass objects or are they substellar brown dwarfs? What fraction of microlensing events is caused by binary lenses? What fraction of microlensing events is connected with binary sources? Paczynski suggested that we shall have definite answers for some presented issues after some years and since the optical depth towards the Galactic bulge is essentially greater than the optical depth towards the LMC, we shall have more information about the lens distribution towards the Galactic bulge, how- ever, probably, some problems in theoretical interpretation will appear after detections of new microlensing event candidates [37]. The main result of the microlensing searches is that the effect predicted the- oretically has been confirmed. This is one of the most important astronomical discoveries. When new observational data would be collected and the processing methods would be perfected, probably some microlensing event candidates lost their sta- tus, but perhaps new microlensing event candidates would be extracted among analyzed observational data. So, the general conclusion may be done. The very important astronomical phenomenon was discovered, but some quanti- tative parameters of microlensing will be specified in future. However, the problem about 80% of DM in the halo of our Galaxy is still open (10 years ago people believe that microlensing could give an answer for this problem). Thus, describing the present status Kerins wrote adequately that now we have "Machos and clouds of uncertainty" [54]. I thank prof. A.I. Studenikin for his kind invitation to present this contri- bution at the XI Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics. References [1] J.G. Soldner, Berliner Astron. Jahrbuch, 1804, 161 (1804). [2] L.D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, 1975, The Classical Theory of Fields, Perg- amon Press, Oxford (1975). [3] C. Moller, The Theory of Relativity Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972. [4] A.F. Zakharov, Gravitatsionnie linzi i microlinzi (Gravitational Lenses and Microlenses) Janus-K, Moscow (1997). [5] A. F. Zakharov, M.V. Sazhin, Phys. Usp., 41, 945 (1998). [6] F. Delplancke, K. Gorski, A. Richichi, Astron. and Astrophys., 375, 701 (2001). [7] B. Paczynski, Preprint astro-ph/0306564 (2003). [8] E. Hog, I.D.Novikov, A.G.Polnarev, Astron. and Astrophys., 294, 287 (1995). [9] M.A. Walker, Astrophys. J., 453, 37 (1995). [10] M. Miyamoto, Y.Yoshii, Astron. J., 110, 1427 (1995). [11] M.V. Sazhin, Pis'ma v Astron. Zhurn., 22, 647 (1996). [12] M.V. Sazhin et al., Montly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 300, 287 (1998). [13] A.F. Boden, M. Shao, D. Van Buren, Astrophys. J., 502, 538 (1998). [14] B. Paczynski, Astrophys. J., 494, L23 (1998). [15] M. Honma, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 53, 223 (2001). [16] M. Honma, T. Kurayama, Astrophys. J., 568, 717 (2002). [17] R. Takahashi, Astrophys. J., 595, 418 (2003). [18] G.F. Lewis, R.A. Ibata, Astrophys. J., 501, 478 (1998). [19] M. Treyer, J. Wambsganss, Preprint astro-ph/0311519. [20] A.F. Zakharov, L. C. Popovi´c, P. Jovanovi´c, Astron. & Astrophys. (ac- cepted); astro-ph/0403254 (2004). [21] J. Oort, Bull. Astron. Instit. Heth., 6, 249 (1932). [22] F. Zwicky, Helvetica Physica Acta, 11, 110 (1933). [23] A.V. Byalko, Astron. Zhurn., 46, 998 (1969). [24] B. Paczynski, Astrophys. J., 304, 1 (1986). [25] K. Griest, Astrophys. J., 366, 412 (1991). [26] C. Alcock et al., Nat., 365, 621 (1993). [27] E. Aubourg et al., Nat., 365, 623 (1993). [28] M. Moniez, Cosmological Physics with Gravitational Lensing, eds. J. Tran Thanh Van, Y. Mellier & M. Moniez, Proc. of the XXXVth Rencontres de Moriond, EDP Sciences, 3, 2001. [29] A. Udalski, Acta Astron., 51, 175 (2002). [30] I.A. Bond et al., MNRAS, 327, 868 (2001). [31] J. Skuljan, Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade, 75, 37 (2003) [32] E. Kerins et al., Preprint astro-ph/0002256 (2000). [33] Y. Le Du, Cosmological Physics with Gravitational Lensing, eds. J. Tran Thanh Van, Y. Mellier & M. Moniez, Proc. of the XXXVth Rencontres de Moriond, EDP Sciences, 65, 2001. [34] E. Roulet, S. Mollerach, Phys. Rep. 279, 2 (1997). [35] A.F. Zakharov, Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade 75, 27 (2003); astro- ph/0212009. [36] M.B. Bogdanov, A.M. Cherepashchuk, Pis'ma v Astron. Zhurn., 21, 570 (1995). [37] B. Paczynski, Ann. Rev. Astron & Astrophys., 34, 419 (1996). [38] M. Dominik, A.C. Hirshfeld, Astron. and Astrophys., 289, L31 (1994). [39] M. Dominik, A.C. Hirshfeld, Preprint DO-TH 95/19, Dortmund (1995). [40] A.V. Gurevich, K.P. Zybin, V.A. Sirota, Phys. Lett. A 214, 232 (1996). [41] A.F. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. A, 250, 67 (1998). [42] A.F. Zakharov, Astron. Rep., 43, 325 (1999). [43] A.F. Zakharov, Dark Matter in Astro- and Particle Physics, ed. H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, Proc. of the Intern. Conf. DARK-2000, Springer, 364 (2001). [44] A.F. Zakharov, Cosmological Physics with Gravitational Lensing, eds. J. Tran Thanh Van, Y. Mellier & M. Moniez, Proc. of the XXXVth Rencontres de Moriond, EDP Sciences, 57 (2001). [45] A.F. Zakharov, M. V. Sazhin, JETP Letters, 63, 937 (1996). [46] A.F. Zakharov, M. V. Sazhin, JETP 83, 1057 (1996). [47] J.H. An et al., 2002, Astroph. J., 572, 521 (2002) [48] D.C. Bennett et al., Astroph. J., 579, 639 (2002). [49] C. Alcock et al., Astroph. J., 541, 734 (2000). [50] C. Alcock et al., Astroph. J., 542, 281 (2000) [51] P. Popowski al., Preprint astro-ph/0304464 (2003). [52] T. Lasserre et al., 2000, Astron & Astroph. , 355, L39 (2000). [53] T. Lasserre, 2001, Dark Matter in Astro- and Particle Physics with Grav- itational Lensing, ed. H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, Proc. of the Intern. Conf. DARK-2000, Springer, 342, 2001. [54] E. Kerins, Cosmological Physics with Gravitational Lensing, eds. J. Tran Thanh Van, Y. Mellier & M. Moniez, Proc. of the XXXVth Rencontres de Moriond, EDP Sciences, 43, 2001.
astro-ph/9907139	1	9907	1999-07-12T11:00:09	Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1	[ "astro-ph" ]	The IRAM interferometer has been used to detect the submm source HDF 850.1 found by Hughes et al. (1998) in the Hubble Deep Field. The flux density measured at 1.3mm is 2.2 mJy, in agreement with the flux density measured at the JCMT. The flux densities and upper limits measured at 3.4, 2.8, 1.3, 0.85, and 0.45 mm show that the emission is from dust. We suggest that the 1.3mm dust source is associated with the optical arc-like feature, 3-593.0, that has a photometric redshift of about 1.7. If HDF 850.1 is at this redshift and unlensed, its spectral energy distribution, combined with that of 3-593.0, matches closely that of the ultraluminous galaxy VII Zw 31. Another possibility is that the dust source may be gravitationally lensed by the elliptical galaxy 3-586.0 at a redshift of 1.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A&A manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) Your thesaurus codes are: 11 (11.09.1 HDF 850.1, 11.09.4, 11.11.1, 11.19.6) ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS 13.1.2018 9 9 9 1 l u J 2 1 1 v 9 3 1 7 0 9 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 D. Downes1, R. Neri1, A. Greve1, S. Guilloteau1, F. Casoli2, D. Hughes3,4, D. Lutz5, K.M. Menten6, D.J. Wilner7, P. Andreani8, F. Bertoldi6, C.L. Carilli9, J. Dunlop3, R. Genzel5, F. Gueth6, R.J. Ivison10, R.G. Mann11, Y. Mellier2,12, S. Oliver11, J. Peacock3, D. Rigopoulou5, M. Rowan-Robinson11, P. Schilke6, S. Serjeant11, L.J. Tacconi5, and M. Wright13 1 Institut de Radio Astronomie Millim´etrique, Domaine Universitaire, F-38406 St. Martin d'H`eres, France 2 DEMIRM, Observatoire de Paris, 61 av. de l'Observatoire, F-75014 Paris, France, and UMR 8540 du CNRS 3 Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK 4 Instituto Nacional de Astrofisica, Optica y Electronica (INAOE), Apartado Postal 51 y 216, 72000 Puebla, Pue., Mexico 5 Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestrische Physik, D-85748 Garching-bei-Munchen, Germany 6 Max-Planck-Institut fur Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hugel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany 7 Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 8 Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit`a di Padova, vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy 9 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, Socorro, N.M., 87801, USA 10 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK 11 Astrophysics Group, Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BZ, UK 12 Institut d'Astrophysique, 98bis, Bd Arago, 75014, Paris, France 13 Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA94720, USA received date; accepted date Abstract. The IRAM Interferometer has been used to detect the submillimeter source HDF 850.1 found by Hughes et al. (1998) in the Hubble Deep Field. The flux density measured at 1.3 mm (236 GHz) is 2.2±0.3(1σ) mJy, in agreement with the flux density mea- sured at the JCMT. The flux densities and upper limits measured at 3.4, 2.8, 1.3, 0.85, and 0.45 mm show that the emission comes from dust. We suggest that the 1.3 mm dust source is associated with the optical arc-like feature, 3-593.0, that has a photometric redshift z ≈ 1.7. If the HDF 850.1 is at this redshift and unlensed, its spectral en- ergy distribution, combined with that of 3-593.0, matches closely that of the ultraluminous galaxy VII Zw 31. An- other possibility is that the dust source may be gravita- tionally lensed by the elliptical galaxy 3-586.0 at z ≈ 1. The position of the dust source agrees within the errors with that of the tentative VLA radio source 3651+1226. Key words: galaxies: structure -- galaxies: individual (HDF-850.1) -- cosmology -- galaxies: ISM Send offprint requests to: D. Downes 1. Introduction Hughes et al. (1998) observed the Hubble Deep Field with the SCUBA multi-beam bolometer array at the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) at 850 and 450 µm. Apart from HDF 850.4 (and possibly HDF 850.3) the SCUBA survey did not detect the mid-IR sources found in the Hubble Deep Field with the ISO satellite (Rowan- Robinson et al. 1997; Mann et al. 1997; Aussel et al. 1999). In general these ISOCAM detections are associated with z < 1 galaxies, while the submillimeter survey appears to have revealed a higher-redshift population of dust en- shrouded starburst galaxies. Further SCUBA surveys of other fields (e.g., Barger et al. 1999a,b; Eales et al. 1999; Lilly et al. 1999) indicate however that many of the sub- mm sources have redshifts smaller than 1, and that much of the star-forming activity in galaxies has occurred rela- tively recently, at z ∼ 2. Richards (1999) argued against high redshifts (z > 2) for the HDF sub-mm sources, from plausible associations of the SCUBA sources with nearby radio sources detected in his VLA survey at 20 cm (1.4 GHz) and the identifica- tion of some of these non-thermal radio continuum sources with optical galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field. From the radio luminosity function of starburst galaxies, Richards argued that if the submm dust sources had cm-radio detec- 2 D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 Table 1. Source Positions Source R.A. (J2000) Dec. (J2000) ∆θ from HDF850.1 Proposed identification: HDF-850.1 3-593.0 3-593.2 3651+1226 12h36m51.98s ± 0.04s 12h36m51.86s ± 0.06s 12h36m51.94s ± 0.06s 12h36m51.96s ± 0.14s 62◦12′25.7′′ ± 0.3′′ 62◦12′25.6′′ ± 0.4′′ 62◦12′25.0′′ ± 0.4′′ 62◦12′26.1′′ ± 1.0′′ Other nearby optical sources within 3′′: 3-586.0 3-577.0 3-613.0 12h36m52.10s ± 0.06s 12h36m52.26s ± 0.06s 12h36m52.37s ± 0.06s 62◦12′26.3′′ ± 0.4′′ 62◦12′27.2′′ ± 0.4′′ 62◦12′25.1′′ ± 0.4′′ Other nearby sources within 6′′: 3-550.2 3-633.1 3-659.1 3651+1221 PM3 29 tentative? 12h36m51.34s ± 0.06s 12h36m51.60s ± 0.06s 12h36m51.72s ± 0.06s 12h36m51.65s ± 0.02s 12h36m51.9s ± 0.4s 12h36m51.58s ± 0.06s 62◦12′26.9′′ ± 0.4′′ 62◦12′22.5′′ ± 0.4′′ 62◦12′20.2′′ ± 0.4′′ 62◦12′21.4′′ ± 0.2′′ 62◦12′21′′ ± 3′′ 62◦12′20.5′′ ± 0.4′′ -- 0.8′′ 0.8′′ 0.4′′ 1.0′′ 2.5′′ 2.8′′ 4.6′′ 4.2′′ 5.8′′ 4.9′′ 4.7′′ 5.9′′ Adopted positions for phase calibrators: 1044+719 1125+596 1300+580 10h48m27.620s ± 0.002s 11h28m13.342s ± 0.002s 13h02m52.465s ± 0.002s 71◦43′35.93′′ ± 0.01′′ 59◦25′14.78′′ ± 0.01′′ 57◦48′37.62′′ ± 0.01′′ 14.0◦ 8.8◦ 5.5◦ Redshift Remark Refs. z -- 1.73 to 1.76 1.82 -- 1.3 mm dust source "arc 1" "arc 2" VLA (3 cm) ? 1.0 to 1.2 2.88, 2.89, 3.36 ? 1.64 elliptical "counterimage" blue irregular 1.72 1.72 0.299 -- -- -- Flux: -- -- -- blue irregular irregular ? Sb spiral (Cowie 1999) VLA (20 cm, 3 cm) ISOCAM (15 µm) 3σ contour at 1.3 mm 1.3 mm 0.39 Jy 0.12 Jy 0.13 Jy 3.4 mm 0.68 Jy 0.20 Jy 0.20 Jy 1 2, 6, 7 2, 6 3 2, 6, 7 6, 7, 8 2, 6, 7 2, 6, 7 2, 6, 7 2, 6 3 4 1 5 5 5 Position refs.: (1) This paper; (2) Williams et al. (1996); (3) Richards et al. (1998); (4) Aussel et al. (1999); (5) Patnaik et al. (1992). Redshift refs.: (6) Rowan-Robinson (1999); (7) Fern´andez-Soto et al. (1999); (8) Zepf et al. (1997) tions, then they must be either z < 2 star-forming galaxies or, if at higher redshift, heated by active galactic nuclei (AGN). To clarify these issues, it is important to obtain good positions for the dust sources by millimeter interfer- ometry to examine possible coincidences with the Hubble Deep Field optical galaxies and VLA radio sources. The strongest object in the SCUBA survey is the source HDF 850.1, which has a flux density of 7.0±0.4 mJy at 850 µm. Follow-up photometry of HDF 850.1 by Hughes et al. (1998) yielded a flux density of 2.1 ± 0.5 mJy at a wavelength of 1.35 mm, confirming that the continuum is optically thin emission by dust. At longer millime- ter wavelengths, the Hubble Deep Field is known to be empty of sources. With the BIMA interferometer, Wilner & Wright (1997) found no sources at 2.8 mm, to a 5σ- limit of 3.5 mJy. Because the 1.3 mm flux density of HDF 850.1 is close to the minimum detectable level in a 10-hr integration at this wavelength, this strongest source in the SCUBA survey may be the only source in the Hubble Deep Field that can be detected at present in reasonable ob- serving times with millimeter interferometers. To measure more accurately the position of this source, we observed it at 1.3 mm and 3 mm with the IRAM Interferometer on Plateau de Bure, France. 2. Observations The observations were made at 1.3 mm and 3 mm simulta- neously, in the interferometer's compact configuration D on November 17 and 22, 1998, and in the more extended configuration C2 on December 15, 16, and 17, 1998. The total integration time was about 40 hours, in excellent weather, with precipitable water vapor content ≈ 1.5 mm, and r.m.s. phase errors at 1.3 mm of ≤ 30◦. The five 15 m dishes give 10 interferometer baselines from 24 m to 80 m in configuration D, and 24 to 183 m in configuration C2. At 1.3 mm, the observing frequency was 236.3 GHz, and data were taken in upper and lower sidebands separated by 3 GHz. At 3 mm, data were taken in lower sideband only, at 2.8 mm (105.7 GHz) on November 17, and at 3.4 mm (88.7 GHz) on all the other dates. The SIS receivers had equivalent system temperatures outside the atmosphere of 150 K SSB at 3 mm, and 250 to 400 K SSB at 1.3 mm. The spectral correlators covered 954 km s−1 at 3.4 mm and 670 km s−1 at 1.3 mm, with resolutions of 8 and 4 km s−1, respectively. Flux densities were calibrated with 3C273 and MWC349, for which we adopted the following val- ues: for 3C273, 11 Jy at 1.3 mm and 18 Jy at 3.4 mm; for MWC349, 1.7 Jy at 1.3 mm and 0.9 Jy at 3.4 mm. The sys- tematic uncertainties in the flux scales are estimated to be ±5% at 3.4 mm and ±10% at 1.3 mm. D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 3 Fig. 1. IRAM interferometer map at 1.3 mm (236.3 GHz) of the continuum emission in a 24′′ field centered on the SCUBA position of the submm source HDF850.1 (cross; the arms of the cross correspond to the 3σ positional uncertainty of Hughes et al. 1998). The synthesized beam is 2.1′′ × 1.7′′ (box at lower left). The map has not been corrected for the response of the primary beam of the 15 m dishes at 1.3 mm (20′′ FWHM; dashed circle). The first positive and negative (dashed) con- tours are at ±0.5 mJy (2 σ), and the contours thereafter are in steps of 0.25 mJy (1 σ). Fig. 2. Interferometer map at 3.4 mm (88.7 GHz) of the con- tinuum emission in a 64′′ field centered on the original SCUBA position (cross) of the submm source HDF850.1. No source is detected, to a limit of 0.36 mJy (3σ). The synthesized beam is 4.7′′ ×4.2′′ (lower left). The map has not been corrected for the response of the primary beam at 3.4 mm (53′′ FWHM; outer dashed circle). The inner dashed circle shows the primary beam at 1.3 mm (see Fig. 1). The first positive and negative (dashed) contours are at ±0.24 mJy (2 σ), and the contours thereafter are in steps of 0.12 mJy (1 σ). Phases were radio sources calibrated with the 1044+719, 1125+596, and 1300+580, for which we adopted the positions listed in Table 1. All three phase calibrators were observed every 20 min, at 1.3 mm and 3 mm simultaneously, and the data were phase calibrated with a weighting by the square of their signal-to-noise ra- tios and by the inverse square of the system tempera- ture. To correct the amplitudes and the phases at both 3 mm and 1.3 mm for atmospheric seeing, we used the 1.3 mm continuum total power measurements to compute the changes in electrical path length due to short-term fluctuations in the atmospheric water vapour content. For the 1.3 mm data, we then adopted the phase vs. time cal- ibration curve at 3 mm (scaled to 1.3 mm) and on top of this, solved for a second-order phase calibration curve to fit the phase residuals at 1.3 mm. We used both uniform and natural weighting of the u, v plane data to make maps. There is not much difference in the final result, and the maps shown here (Figs. 1 & 2) are the ones made with natural weighting. The 1.3 mm map in Fig. 1 includes all the data, in both sidebands and in the compact and extended configurations, and has been deconvolved with the CLEAN algorithm by Clark (1980), with 100 iterations. 3. Results 3.1. Detection at 1.3 mm A continuum source was well detected at 1.3 mm (236.3 GHz), in the D configuration on November 17 and November 22 in the double sideband data, and in the upper and lower sidebands separately. All of these data subsets agree in the source position and flux den- sity, within the errors. On the map that results from adding all the data together (Fig. 1), the flux density is 2.2 ± 0.3 mJy. This result agrees with the single-dish value of 2.1 ± 0.5 mJy measured by Hughes et al. (1998) at 1.35 mm. The 1.3 mm source is at a position 2.4′′ west and 0.7′′ south of the SCUBA position of the submm source HDF 850.1 found by Hughes et al. (1998). The SCUBA detec- tion was made with the 15 m JCMT single dish, with a 14.7′′ beam at 850 µm. Hughes et al. quoted r.m.s. posi- tional uncertainties of 0.7′′ in each coordinate. The inter- ferometer position differs from the SCUBA position at the 3.6 σ level, indicating that there may have been an unsus- pected systematic error in the SCUBA positions, which in turn may affect some of the other submm/optical associ- ations suggested by Hughes et al. (1998). 4 D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 fluxes of HDF 850.1 would be only 0.13 mJy at 2.8 mm and 0.07 mJy at 3.4 mm. 3.4. No spectral lines detected Although our main goal was the detection of dust emission at 1.3 mm, we chose the frequency in the upper sideband, 237.824 GHz, to coincide with the CO(9 -- 8) line at z = 3.36, the tentative redshift assigned by Zepf, Moustakas, & Davis (1997) to the optical source 3-577.0 located 1.4′′ east of the z ≈ 1 elliptical galaxy 3-586.0. No line was de- tected in the upper sideband, to a limit of 6 mJy beam−1 in channels 32 km s−1 wide in the velocity range −300 to +367 km s−1 relative to the frequency of the CO(9 -- 8) line at this redshift. We also detected no line in the lower side- band, 3 GHz lower in frequency. At 3 mm, we initially chose 105.7 GHz to search for the CO(4 -- 3) line at z = 3.36. At this frequency, no line was seen, to a limit of 2 mJy beam−1 in channels 30 km s−1 wide, in the velocity range ±400 km s−1 around the fre- quency of the CO(4 -- 3) line at this redshift. Later on, we tuned the 3 mm receivers to 88.738 GHz to search for the CO(1 -- 0) line at z = 0.299, the redshift of the bright disk galaxy, 3-659.1, located 10′′ to the southwest of HDF 850.1. In velocity channels 34 km s−1 wide, no line was seen to a limit of 2 mJy beam−1, anywhere in our 53′′ primary beam, in the velocity range −450 to +460 km s−1 cen- tered on 88.738 GHz. For a galaxy with lines ∼ 200 km s−1 wide, this corresponds to a limit of 0.4 Jy km s−1 for the CO(1 -- 0) line flux. For comparison, the Milky Way has a CO(1 -- 0) line luminosity of 4 × 108 K km s−1 pc2 inside the solar circle (Rivolo & Solomon 1988), so at z ≈ 0.3, the Milky Way would have a CO(1 -- 0) line flux of 0.05 Jy km s−1. 4. Astrometry We estimate the r.m.s. positional uncertainty to be 0.3′′ for the centroid of the 1.3 mm dust source. This limit is set by the baseline accuracy of the interferometer, the availabil- ity of phase calibrators in this part of the sky, the signal to noise ratio, and the seeing. Thus far, the best astrometry done with the interferometer was for the source W3(OH), with phases calibrated on the quasar 0224+671, located 5◦ away. In those projects (Wink et al. 1994; Wyrowski et al. 1997; 1999), the global statistical positional repeatabil- ity was 0.05′′ r.m.s., including the systematic errors in the baseline geometry. To this must be added the 0.01′′ uncer- tainty in the Jodrell Bank -- VLA position of the calibrator source. For the current Hubble Deep Field project, our strongest calibrator is 14◦ away (Table 1), so the r.m.s. error in position would be three times worse, namely 0.2′′, also with Jodrell Bank-VLA calibrator uncertainties of 0.01′′ (Patnaik et al. 1992). To reduce errors, we chose the three phase calibrators at earlier and later right ascensions, and lower and higher Fig. 3. Visibility plot for the continuum source detected at 1.3 mm. The plot shows the real part of the visibility ampli- tude vs. baseline, for u, v-plane data averaged in circular bins of 20 m spacing, with 1σ error bars. The data do not have a high enough signal-to-noise ratio to yield an angular size. The "best-fit" (solid curve) is for a 2.2 mJy gaussian source of FWHP diameter 0.7′′. The dashed curves show the visibility functions at the 2 σ uncertainty of the fit, for a 1.7′′ source (lower dashed curve) and a point source (upper dashed curve). 3.2. Size of the 1.3 mm source The source is too weak to measure an angular size. In the maps from the longer-baseline C2 configuration alone, the flux at the source position is 1.3 ± 0.5 mJy, so the source may be partially resolved. Our fits to the data in the u, v- plane yield a "best fit" FWHP diameter of 0.7′′ ± 0.5′′. At the 2 σ level, the visibility data (Fig. 3) agree with sizes ranging from 1.7′′ to a point source. What size should we expect? Since we observe mm/submm dust radiation, the source cannot be very hot. For example, a circular source at z ≈ 1.7 (see below) 1 with a dust temperature of 35 K, which has a dust opacity of unity at an emitted wavelength of 100µm, would yield a flux of 2.2 mJy at an observed wavelength of 1.3 mm if its diameter were 0.3′′. A less opaque source would be even larger. 3.3. No detection of 3 mm continuum No source was detected at either 2.8 mm (105.7 GHz) or at 3.4 mm (88.7 GHz), to 3σ limits of 0.5 mJy and 0.4 mJy respectively (Fig. 2). This is consistent with the 1.3 mm continuum being optically thin emission by dust. For a typical dust continuum spectral index of 3.5, the expected 1 We use H0 = 50 km s−1 Mpc−1 and q0 = 0.5 in this paper. D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 5 Fig. 4. IRAM interferometer map at 1.3 mm (236.3 GHz) of the dust continuum emission superimposed on a greyscale version of the BVI image from the Hubble Deep Field. The map is the same as in Fig. 1, but here we only plot the 1.3 mm contours at 0.75 mJy (3 σ), 1.25 mJy (5 σ), and 1.75 mJy (7 σ). The cross marked SCUBA indicates the position and 3σ uncertainty of HDF 850.1 as given by Hughes et al. (1998). Small crosses with black dots indicate the positions and 1σ uncertainties of the VLA sources (Richards 1999) and the large cross marked ISO indicates the position and 1σ uncertainty of the ISOCAM 15µm source (Aussel et al. 1999). Optical objects are identified with their photometric redshifts, from the references in Table 1, except for the optical source 3-577.0, which has a tentative spectroscopic redshift of 3.36 (Zepf et al. 1997). 6 D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 declinations than the Hubble Deep Field (Table 1). This should formally reduce the noise in the baseline errors and √2 in our weighted average of calibrators by a factor ∼ to √3. To check internal consistency of the reduction soft- ware, we made maps of the calibrator sources, and on the maps, the position errors were < 0.1′′. The uncertainties in their measured cm-radio positions from the Jodrell-VLA survey are ten times lower (Table 1). Two of the calibra- tors are weak, ∼ 0.1 Jy at 1.3 mm, but their signal-to-noise ratio is quite satisfactory at 3 mm. Because we subtract the scaled 3 mm phase fluctuations from those at 1.3 mm, we can improve the fit of the phase solution at 1.3 mm, but there remains a residual instrumental phase error, which brings the astrometric part of the position error to 0.2′′ r.m.s. In addition to the astrometric error, there is a statis- tical error related to the signal-to-noise ratio. For a point source, this position error due to noise is (1) ∆θ ≈ (B/2)/(S/N ) where B is the synthesized beam, and S/N is the signal- to-noise ratio. For our map in configurations D + C2, the beam B is 2.1′′, and the signal-to-noise ratio is S/N = 7, so the position error due to noise is ∆θ = 0.2′′ r.m.s. The convolution of the astrometric error (0.2′′), and the noise error (0.2′′) then gives a root sum square error of 0.3′′. 5. Source Identification The identification of the 1.3 mm dust source with an opti- cal galaxy or a cm-radio source in the Hubble Deep Field depends strongly on the accuracy of the measured posi- tions. The radio-optical registration of the Hubble Deep Field is described by Williams et al. (1996). Their esti- mated accuracy of this absolute registration is 0.4′′. The estimated accuracy of the 1.3 mm IRAM position is 0.3′′. Radio: The new 1.3 mm position clearly rules out the identification with the optical source 3-577.0 proposed by Hughes et al. (1998) from the SCUBA data. It also rules out the identification, suggested by Richards (1999), of the 1.3 mm dust source with the VLA source, 3651+1221, lo- cated 4.9′′±0.4′′ to the southwest (see further discussion of this source in the Appendix). The 1.3 mm dust source co- incides with the tentative VLA source 3651+1226, which is a 4.5σ detection at 3 cm (Richards et al. 1998). Optical: On the Hubble Deep Field image (Fig. 4), the closest object to the 1.3 mm dust source is the arc-like feature comprising the optical sources 3-593.0 and 3-593.2. From the optical coordinates published by Williams et al. (1996), this arc-like feature is 0.8′′ ± 0.7′′ southwest of the 1.3 mm dust source, where the 0.7′′ error is the sum of the optical and 1.3 mm position errors (Table 1). We must take the sum of the errors rather than the root sum square because the radio-optical registration uncertainty is a systematic error rather than a random error. Fig. 5. Allowed values of the dust temperature and gas mass, as functions of redshift, for an unlensed source, that are consistent with the observed 1.3 mm flux of 2 mJy and the 450µm/1300µm flux ratio. "Low" redshift (z ≈ 1) solutions re- quire low temperature (20 K) and high gas mass (6×1010 M⊙). "High" redshift (z ≈ 3) solutions can have higher dust temper- atures (60 K) and lower gas mass (8 × 109 M⊙). The Elliptical: The next nearest optical object is the source 3-586.0, located 1.0′′ ± 0.7′′ east of the 1.3 mm dust source. The optical source 3-586.0 is an elliptical galaxy at a photometric redshift of 1.0 ≤ z ≤ 1.2 (Hogg et al. 1996; Lanzetta et al. 1996 (their source number 3-306); Mobasher et al. 1996; Gwyn & Hartwick 1996; Sawicki et al. 1997; Wang et al. 1998; Fern´andez-Soto et al. 1999 -- their source 303). The optical photometry of this elliptical galaxy is tabulated by Fasano et al. (1998), and its spectral energy distribution (SED) is given by Cowie (1999). The spectrum rises from the optical regime to a maximum near 2 µm, where it flattens out at a level of ∼ 10 µJy, consistent with the non-detection at a level of 23 µJy at 15 µm (Oliver et al, in prep., reported by Hughes et al. 1998; Aussel et al. 1999). From the position alone, the dust source could be the arc-like feature or the elliptical. We argue, however, that the 1.3 mm dust source is probably associated with the arc-like feature. Although we cannot associate the dust source with this optical object from the astrometry, we now present several physical arguments that support this association and disfavor the elliptical. 5.1. Dust flux ratios, dust temperature, and gas mass The source HDF 850.1 is not detected at 450 µm to a limit of 21 mJy (Hughes et al. 1998), nor is it in the IRAS Faint Source Catalog, nor in the ISO images of the Hubble Deep Field at 6.7 µm and 15 µm (Aussel et al. 1999). We thus have a limit on the 450 µm to 1300 µm flux ratio, where the emission is optically thin (the spectral index is ∼ 3). This ratio is S(450µm)/S(1300µm) ≤ 10. Let the corresponding observed frequencies (667 and 236 GHz) be D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 7 ν2 and ν1, respectively. Because the shape of the Planck function is preserved with redshift, the ratio is the same at the emitted frequencies, namely S(ν2) S(ν1) = (cid:18) ν2 ν1(cid:19)3 (ehν1(1+z)/kTd − 1) (ehν2(1+z)/kTd − 1) (1 − e−τ (ν2(1+z))) (1 − e−τ (ν1(1+z))) (2) where Td is the dust temperature and τ (ν) is the dust op- tical depth. Experience in millimeter detection of dust at high redshifts during the past decade shows that sources are only detected when they contain large amounts of dust (∼ 108 M⊙) -- as in the IR ultraluminous galaxies which have dust opacities equal to unity near a wavelength of 100 µm (e.g., Downes, Solomon, & Radford 1993). At this wavelength (frequency 3 THz), one may approximate the dust opacity as τ (ν) = (ν/3)n, where ν is the emitted fre- quency in THz, and n is the dust emissivity index, where n ≈ 1.5 to 2. Regardless of whether the dust is optically thick or thin, however, at "low" redshifts (z < 1), the ra- tio in eq.(2) can be as low as the observed value of ≤ 10 only with dust temperatures Td ≤ 20 K. (Fig. 5). From the mere detection of dust at 1.3 mm with a flux density of 2.2 mJy, we can make a useful deduction about the gas mass from the formula (cf. Downes et al. 1992) Way were moved to z = 1, at an emission distance (angu- lar size distance) of 1.75 Gpc, then the 1.3 mm observed flux would be only 36 µJy, that is, 60 times lower than the dust flux we detect. At higher redshifts, the observed limit on the 450 µm to 1300 µm flux ratio allows the dust temperature to be higher. For example, at z = 3, the dust temperature can be 60 K, comparable with the blackbody dust temperatures deduced for IR ultraluminous galaxies from their IRAS fluxes (e.g. Downes & Solomon 1998). The corresponding molecular gas masses deduced from the observed 1.3 mm flux also become plausible -- a few ×109 M⊙, even in the absence of gravitational magnification. Because the line of sight to the source passes so close to the elliptical -- a good gravitational lens -- the observed mm and submm fluxes may be gravitationally magnified, and the real gas mass even lower. In summary, our argument, based on the mm and submm fluxes alone, that the dust source cannot be a "low" redshift (z ≤ 1) object, is as follows: a) the op- tical depth is not high; b) the observed flux ratio may be obtained at low redshift only if the dust temperature is sufficiently low (< 20 K), and c) the observed flux plus a low temperature requires an excessive gas mass. M [M⊙] = 1.6 106 (1 + z) Sνobs [Jy] (cid:20) DL [Mpc](cid:21)2(cid:20) Td [K](cid:21)−1(cid:20) νem [THz](cid:21)−(2+n) (3) 5.2. Other arguments against identifying HDF 850.1 with the elliptical galaxy 3-586.0 where M is the gas mass, S is the flux density, DL is the luminosity distance, Td is the dust temperature, νem is the emitted frequency, and n is the dust emissivity in- dex, which we adopt to be n = 1.5. The main assump- tion is that the emission comes from optically thin dust. The equation is for a dust mass absorption coefficient of 0.11 m2 kg−1 of dust at an emitted wavelength of 1.3 mm, as in dense molecular clouds (e.g., Krugel & Siebenmor- gen 1994, their Fig. 12), and a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100. The uncertainties are about a factor of three in each direction -- higher and lower (for an analysis, see Hughes, Dunlop, & Rawlings 1997). Higher gas-to-dust ratios mean even larger gas masses. To have a flux density of 2 mJy at 1.3 mm with the low dust temperature derived above, a "low"-redshift (z ≈ 1) source would need a very high molecular gas mass, approaching 1011 M⊙. Lower dust temperatures or less opaque dust or higher gas-to-dust ratios would all im- ply even higher gas masses. Such an enormous quantity of dust and molecular gas would have dramatic consequences for star formation, and such a large, gas-rich galaxy at low redshift would have been easily seen on the HDF images or in the follow-up optical spectroscopy of these sources (e.g. Zepf et al. 1997). For comparison, a large galaxy like NGC 891, at a distance of 10 Mpc, has a total 1.3 mm dust continuum flux of 730 mJy, corresponding to a molecular gas mass of 1.5 × 109 M⊙ (Gu´elin et al. 1993), about the same as that of the Milky Way. If NGC 891 or the Milky A number of other facts argue against the optical source 3-586.0, an elliptical galaxy at z ≈ 1, being the optical object associated with the 1.3 mm dust source. 1) The gas and dust masses of ellipticals are generally too low for 1.3 mm dust detections (Mgas < 1010 M⊙). Even in nearby ellipticals, there are very few detections (see, e.g., the review by Knapp 1999). The three galaxies with dust detections > 3σ reported by Wiklind & Henkel (1995) have gas masses ranging from 1×105 to 7×108 M⊙. The much larger dust and gas mass predicted by the phys- ical arguments in the previous section would be totally inconsistent with the gas content of an elliptical galaxy like 3-586.0. Such galaxies typically have a total dynami- cal mass (mostly stars) of 3 × 1010 M⊙ within a radius of 1 kpc, and, with a de Vaucouleurs profile, enclose a total mass of 2× 1011 M⊙ at a radius of 7 kpc ( 0.85′′ at z ≈ 1). This argument from the dust and gas mass needed to yield 2 mJy at 1.3 mm is equivalent to the empirical luminosity argument by Hughes et al. (1998) -- that the mm/sub- mm luminosity of the source HDF 850.1 is two orders of magnitude too high to be emission by dust in the z ≈ 1 elliptical galaxy 3-586.0. Therefore the dust source cannot be the z = 1 elliptical galaxy. 2) Dust has not yet been detected at 1.3 mm in any "normal " galaxy at z ≈ 1. The reasons are firstly, that the redshift is not high enough to shift warm dust emission into the millimeter band, and secondly, that the emission distance (angular size distance) is close to its maximum. 8 D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 A striking exception is the extremely red, z = 1.44 galaxy HR 10 (or ERO J164502+4626.4), for which Cimatti et al. (1998) and Dey et al. (1999) find mm/submm dust fluxes corresponding to an astonishing far-IR luminosity of ∼ 1013 L⊙, a molecular gas mass of ∼ 1011 M⊙, and an apparent star formation rate of 1000 to 2000 M⊙ yr−1. It will be important to investigate whether this object is gravitationally lensed or not. 3) We argued above that if the object is at z ≈ 1, the dust must be cold. So far, however, the mm detections of dust in high-z objects are mainly of "warm" dust (T > 30 K), probably circumnuclear regions heated by an AGN and/or a nuclear starburst. Therefore it is most unlikely that we are detecting the elliptical at z ∼ 1. 6. Discussion 6.1. The dust source HDF850.1 as an unlensed source Hughes et al. (1998) gave a very plausible interpretation of HDF850.1 as a high-redshift starburst galaxy, similar to the ultraluminous infrared galaxies at z < 0.3. As dis- cussed above, from the interferometer position measure- ment and the physical arguments about the gas mass, it is likely that the dust source HDF850.1 is associated with the optical arc-like feature 3-593.0/593.2. The photomet- ric redshift estimates of the arc are z = 1.73 (Rowan- Robinson 1999) and z = 1.76 (Fern´andez-Soto et al. 1999). In this part of the sky there seems to be a cluster or a group of galaxies at photometric redshifts z ≈ 1.7 (the objects 3-593.0, 3-633.1, 3-550.2, and 3-613.0). It is con- ceivable that the dust source is at this redshift as well, and that it is part of the same object as the optical arc-like fea- ture. Such a redshift for HDF850.1 would be well within the redshift distribution of the identified sources detected so far with the SCUBA array in other fields (e.g., Barger et al. 1999a,b; Eales et al. 1999; Lilly et al. 1999). No optical lines were detected in the arc by Zepf et al. (1997). Why not? A simple explanation is that the ob- ject is at 1.2 < z < 2.4, consistent with the photometric redshifts, so that no strong lines are shifted into the op- tical. As shown by the data of Zepf et al. (1997), the arc 3-593.0 is not likely to be at z ≥ 3, because it is too blue -- it shows up nicely in the HST F450W band, and it has significant flux in the F300W band. It is not a "U-band dropout", that is, the hydrogen along the line of sight does not greatly decrease the flux in the F300W band, as it would if the object were at z ≥ 3, again consistent with the photometric redshift of z ∼ 1.7. The arc is much bluer than, for example, the object 3-577.0, which has a photometric redshift of 2.88 (see, e.g, the colors tabulated in Zepf et al. 1997). In fact, the data on HDF 850.1, if combined with the optical fluxes of the optical arc-like feature 3-593.0 and a redshift of 1.7, agree rather well with the spectral energy distribution of the ultraluminous infrared galaxy Fig. 6. Spectral energy distribution for the dust source HDF 850.1 and the optical source 3-593.0 if they are at z ≈ 1.7, compared with the spectral energy distribution of the ultralu- minous IR galaxy VII Zw 31 at z = 0.054. Data for HDF 850.1 are from this paper and Hughes et al. (1998). For 3-593.0, fluxes are from Fern´andez-Soto et al. (1999). For the VLA source 3651+1226, cm-radio fluxes are from Richards et al. (1998) and Richards (1999). For VII Zw 31, IR and optical data are from Trentham et al. (1999); mm limits are from Downes & Solomon (1998), and the 20 cm flux is from Condon et al. (1996). The solid curve shows a spectrum of the far-IR emitting dust com- ponent, from the model described in the text. The dashed line is for an assumed synchrotron spectral index α = −0.75 for VII Zw 31. VII Zwicky 31. This object, which was interpreted by Djorgovski et al. (1990) as a merger-induced starburst galaxy, was recently selected for study with the HST by Trentham, Kormendy, & Sanders (1999) because its "cool" spectral energy distribution indicates it is an ultralumi- nous galaxy that derives its IR luminosity from an em- bedded starburst only, with no "warm" AGN component. Figure 6 shows this comparison with VII Zw 31, if HDF 850.1 is associated with the optical object 3-593.0, that has a photometric redshift of z ≈ 1.7. For VII Zw 31, we took the IRAS and HST data from Trentham et al. (1999), re-scaled for H0 = 50 km s−1 Mpc−1. The luminosities of the far-IR peak of HDF 850.1 and the optical emission of 3-593.0, calculated for z = 1.7, correspond quite well to the observed luminosity of VII Zw 31. The solid curve in Fig. 6 shows the predicted spectrum of the cool dust com- ponent from the radiative-transfer model for VII Zw 31 by Downes & Solomon (1998). In that model, the dust temperature varies with galactocentric radius. The denser dust that is opaque at 100 µm has a temperature of 50 K. The millimeter dust emission is transparent over the full extent of the source, for which the global spatial average of the dust temperature is ∼ 35 K. There is also a good agreement in the size of 3-593.0 and the dust region in VII Zw 31. On the Hubble Deep Field image, the bright part of 3-593.0 has a radius of D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 9 0.22′′, or ∼ 1.9 kpc at z ≈ 1.7. The total emission along the arclike feature, including the faint optical object 3- 593.2, has an radius of 0.67′′, or 5.6 kpc. In VII Zw 31, the relevant dimensions are nearly the same. The half-power radius of the rotating molecular gas disk in VII Zw 31 is 1.7 kpc, with an outer radius of 5 kpc (Downes & Solomon 1998), and the ring of star-forming knots in VII Zw 31 has a radius of 3.4 kpc (Mazzarella et al. 1999; image in Tren- tham et al. 1999). This good match to the star-forming region of VII Zw 31 in both size and spectral energy dis- tribution, if HDF 850.1 is at z ≈ 1.7 and associated with 3-593.0, suggests a plausible interpretation of HDF 850.1 as an ultraluminous IR galaxy with the same intrinsic 8 µm to 1000 µm luminosity as VII Zw 31, namely, LIR = 2 × 1012 L⊙. Although the best-fit photometric redshift for the opti- cal arc-like feature 3-593.0 is with an Scd galaxy template at z = 1.73 to 1.76 (Fern´andez-Soto et al. 1999; Rowan- Robinson 1999), the redshift likelihood function does have a much smaller alias as a starburst galaxy at z = 2.6 (Fern´andez-Soto, private communication) to 3.0 (Rowan- Robinson 1999). The fit is not as good as for z = 1.73, in particular for the J-magnitude, but it is not implausible. This is in fact the case discussed by Hughes et al. (1998; see their Fig. 5). The spectral energy distribution would still match that of VII Zw 31, as in Fig. 6, scaled up by a factor of 3.6 (to correct for the greater luminosity dis- tance), except in the optical range, where the arc source 3-593.0 would then be much more blue than VII Zw 31. A better fit for both HDF 850.1 and 3-593.0 would be obtained with the other two sources measured by Tren- tham et al. (1999), namely, IRAS 12112+0305 and IRAS F22491−1808. Because of the greater luminosity distance at z = 3, the 8 µm to 1000 µm luminosity would have to be LIR = 8.2 × 1012 L⊙, which would place HDF 850.1 among the most powerful of the ultraluminous galaxies, like Mrk 231 (see, e.g., the sample of Sanders et al. 1988). In summary, the arguments in favor of the interpreta- tion as an unlensed source at z ∼ 1.7 are the fairly good match in both size and spectral energy distribution with VII Zw 31, the better fit of the optical template with a photometric redshift of 1.7 for 3-593.0, the absence of any strong lines in the optical spectrum, which is better un- derstood if z ∼ 1.7, the apparent cluster of objects in the range z = 1.6 to 1.8 in this region, the blue color of the arc, and the fact that the total luminosity of 2 × 1012 L⊙ is not exceptional in the class of ultraluminous galaxies, consistent with the absence of any indication of an em- bedded optical quasar or Seyfert 1 nucleus (see, e.g., Kim & Sanders 1998; Solomon et al. 1997). The arguments in favor of an interpretation as an un- lensed source at z ∼ 3 have been given by Hughes et al. (1998) and Carilli & Yun (1999). To these arguments we may add the poorer-fitting alias for a photometric red- shift of 2.6 or 3.0. The consequence is that the IR lumi- nosity would place the source among the most powerful of the ultraluminous galaxies, those containing a quasar or a Seyfert 1 nucleus. These objects are fairly rare in the exist- ing samples of ultraluminous galaxies (see the luminosity histogram of Kim & Sanders 1998; their Fig. 3), and usu- ally have a small, bright, symmetric nucleus resembling a reddened QSO (Surace et al. 1998). There is no evidence for such a bright QSO-like nucleus in the optical image of 3-593.0, which instead looks like a star-forming region extended over several kpc. 6.2. The dust source HDF850.1 as a lensed source Another possibility is that HDF 850.1 is a lensed source. The relative abundance of lensed sources in the submm is expected to be large, because the submm flux density- redshift relations of distant, dusty, star-forming galaxies are flat, leading to a larger fraction of brighter images in the submm relative to the optical (Blain 1997). The fraction of gravitationally lensed sources at the 10 mJy level at 850 µm is > 0.01 (Blain 1998, his Fig. 4; Blain et al. 1999), orders of magnitude greater than for the corre- sponding optical sources. There is therefore a good chance that we are detecting a lensed source, especially if the line of sight is close to an elliptical galaxy. Hogg et al. (1996) originally proposed that the arc-like feature 3-593.0 was a source gravitationally lensed by the elliptical galaxy at z ≈ 1 because of the 1.8′′ separation of the arc from the elliptical 3-586, the mass of the el- liptical as deduced from its luminosity, the appearance of the arc, concave toward the elliptical, and the fact that other gravitational lenses tend to be ellipticals. It is possi- ble that the dust source is part of the same object as the optical arc-like feature. and lies near a high-magnification point of the lens. The non-detection of optical lines in the arc is con- sistent with 1.2 < z < 2.4 (S. Zepf, private communi- cation and Zepf et al. 1997). The low end of this range is close to the redshift of the elliptical, giving an unfa- vorable geometry for lensing. The high end of the range, however, yields nearly the same geometry as for IRAS F10214+4724, where the elliptical is at z = 0.9 and the source is at z = 2.3. If the optical arc-like feature is at its photometric redshift (z ∼ 1.7), then the arc source and the elliptical are in a favorable configuration for lens- ing. The approximate radius of the circle of images may be roughly estimated from the standard formula for the Einstein radius for an isothermal, spherical lens θE = (cid:18) σv 186 km s−1(cid:19)2 DA(LS) DA(S) (4) (e.g., Peacock 1999, his eq. 4.14), where σv is the line of sight velocity dispersion of the lens in km s−1, and DA(LS) and DA(S) are the angular size distances from the lens to the source and from the observer to the source respec- tively. 10 D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 Table 2. Comparison of the HDF 850.1/3-586.0/3-593.0 system with other lensed sources -- -- -- -- -- Elliptical galaxy -- -- -- -- -- Lens redshift zlens m814 r < 0.2′′ (mag) m814 mH+K total total (mag) (mag) σv (km s−1) Source HDF 850.1 system: Source redshift -- -- -- -- -- Lensed feature -- -- -- -- -- opt./UV magnifi- cation crit.curve m814 total (mag) zs radii (arcsec) HDF 3-586.0/3-593.0 1.0 -- 23.3 19.5 < 340 ∼ 1.7? 1.61 26.1 -- Other lenses: IRAS F10214+4724 HST 14176+5226 Cloverleaf 0.9 0.81 ∼ 1 ? 22.8 -- > 24 20.3 19.7 18.5 -- 270 260 > 22.5 ∼ 20.5 < 350 2.286 3.4 2.558 1.2×0.8 2 × 1.5 0.7×0.5 20.44 25.8 17.5 ∼ 100 -- 18 to 30 HDF 3-586.0/3-593.0 data from Cowie (1999); lens model from Hogg et al. (1996). IRAS F10214+4724 data and lens model from Eisenhardt et al. (1996); IR data from Evans et al. (1999). HST 14176+5226 data from Ratnatunga et al. (1995); Crampton et al. (1996); lens model from Hjorth & Kneib (1999). Cloverleaf data and lens model from Kneib et al. (1998a; 1998b), Turnshek et al. (1997), and Chae & Turnshek (1999). In the lower-mass, isothermal, elliptical-potential model of Hogg et al. (1996), where only 3-593.0 and 3.577.0 were a candidate lensed pair, the optical arc was close to the critical radius of 1.6′′, from which they de- rived a velocity dispersion of ≥ 340 km s−1 if the elliptical galaxy is at z = 1. If the dust source is at z ≈ 1.7, and is a lensed image 0.8′′ from the elliptical, then the very rough estimate from eq.(4) also yields a velocity disper- sion of ∼ 330 km s−1. Hogg et al. (1996) tried to explain not only the apparent arc 3-593.0, concave toward the el- liptical, but also the object 3-577.0 as its counterimage, elongated toward the elliptical. The observations of Zepf et al. (1997) made this candidate counterimage unlikely, however, because of the tentative detection of a Lyα line at z = 3.36 in 3-577.0, and the different B450 − V606 colors in the arc and the "counterimage" (the arc is bluer than its candidate "counterimage"; for an alternative interpre- tation, see Dickinson 1998). How could the HDF 850.1 dust source and the optical arc-like feature be at different positions? There are sev- eral ways this could happen. In the source that is lensed, the dust emission may not be in the same place as the UV/optical emission. The dust source and the optical arc could be different parts of the same galaxy, or a merger of two galaxies, with their light paths deflected to different spots by the elliptical. They would intersect the ellipti- cal's cusp and fold caustics differently, and have different magnifications, and different image shapes on the sky. If the source is at z ≈ 1.7 and lensed, its luminosity would still be that of a starburst galaxy. These objects are often highly distorted, with double nuclei, or multiple knots of emission -- good candidates to yield non-coincident opti- cal and mm/submm images if gravitationally lensed. Non-coincident images in different wavebands can be expected quite naturally, as shown by the comparison with other lensed sources in the next section. 6.3. Comparison with other lensed systems More than half of the high-redshift objects in which dust and/or CO has been detected at 1.3 mm are known to be gravitationally lensed, with magnification factors ≈ 10 for the mm dust emission in some of the sources (e.g. IRAS F10214+4724, the Cloverleaf quasar, APM 08279+5255, MG 0414+0534, and very likely BR 1202−07). Other submm-selected sources are also lensed, with lower am- plification factors (e.g., SMM J02399-0136 and SMM J14011+0252: Ivison et al. 1998; Frayer et al. 1998; 1999). Table 2 compares the lower-mass model for the ellipti- cal 3-586.0 from Hogg et al. (1996) with similar models for IRAS F10214+4724, HST 14176+5226, and the Cloverleaf quasar, in which the lensing elliptical galaxies are at com- parable redshifts. An important point in these examples is that a gravitational lens can image different parts of a source to different spots on the sky in different wavebands. In IRAS F10214+4724, the combination of an ellip- tical at z = 0.9 and a source at z = 2.3 gives strong magnification with a 1.18′′ asymptotic critical radius for the UV light redshifted to the optical. The optical arc in 10214+4724 contains two peaks. In the model of Eisen- hardt et al. (1996), the brighter east peak is interpreted as the blending of two images merging on the critical curve, while the west peak is interpreted as the third im- age. A possible analogy in the HDF 850.1 system might be the brighter optical source 3-593.0 as the two-image blend, and the weaker peak 3-593.2 as the third image. The 10214+4724 counterimage is 100 times fainter than the main arc, and has not been detected in the cm-radio or mm-dust emission. The models by Eisenhardt et al. (1996) for 10214+4724 predict a 0.4′′ radial displacement in the K-band arc, due to the larger source region at longer wavelengths. They note that an 0.5′′ infrared source would be imaged into an elliptical ring with a position angle per- pendicular to that of the optical arc, with the center of the D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 11 ring offset from the elliptical. In fact, the HST NICMOS observations of 10214+4724 by Evans et al. (1999) show that the peak position of the arc changes even between wavelengths of 1.1 and 2.1 µm. In HST 14176+5226, the lens redshift, total magni- tude of the elliptical galaxy in the HST F814W band, and calculated line-of-sight velocity dispersion of the elliptical are very similar to those of the elliptical that lenses IRAS F10214+4724. In the detailed model by Hjorth & Kneib (1999) for the lensing of HST 14176+5226, the magnified images in the Einstein cross configuration actually lie out- side the critical line, which is an elongated ellipse. In the Cloverleaf quasar, the lensing galaxy has re- cently been detected in NICMOS images (Kneib et al. 1998b), and may belong to a galaxy cluster or group at z ≈ 0.9. The lensing effect may be due to a combination of the elliptical and the galaxy group. The different source size in different spectral regions leads to quite different im- ages. In the Cloverleaf, the four optical images are circular spots, while the four millimeter sources are arcs (Kneib et al. 1998a). 6.4. Possible identification of the dust source with the ten- tative VLA source 3651+1226 and implications from the radio-FIR relation From the positions in Table 1 and Fig. 4, the 1.3 mm dust source appears to coincide with the weak VLA radio source 3651+1226, listed in the Supplementary Catalogue of Richards et al. (1998; their Table 5). At a wavelength of 3.5 cm, this 4.5σ source has a (revised) sky flux den- sity of 7.5±2.2 µJy (E. Richards, private communication). From the map by Richards (1999) one may set a 3σ up- per limit of 23 µJy at 20 cm. The dust emission extrap- olated from the 2 mJy measured at 1.3 mm, would yield only 0.02 µJy at 3.5 cm, so the cm-radio source must be mainly synchrotron emission, not dust. Using this VLA source in relation with the cm-radio-to-far-IR correlation in low-redshift star-forming galaxies, Carilli & Yun (1999) concluded that HDF 850.1 could be at a redshift z ≥ 3, because the 350/1.4 GHz index α350 1.4 is > 1. With regard to this submm-to-radio ratio, it is instruc- tive to compare the observed flux density of HDF 850.1 with that expected from the ultraluminous IR galaxy Arp 220, if the latter were at high redshift. The result is shown in Table 3, which indicates that Arp 220 could not be detected much beyond z ≈ 1.7 at 20 cm, even with deep integrations with the VLA, a fact stressed by Richards (1999). An unlensed Arp 220 would not be detectable with the IRAM interferometer at 1.3 mm to the detection lim- its reported in this paper, in the range 1.7 < z < 4. It would also be 3.5 to 6 times weaker at 850 µm than the flux observed by Hughes et al. (1998) for HDF 850.1. Nor would it have been detected by the ISOCAM instrument at 15 µm, in the same range of redshift. Table 3. Expected unlensed flux densities of Arp 220 at high-z Arp 220 expected flux at wavelength: VLA 20 cm (µJy) 3 × 105 37 14 8 Redshift z 0.01818 1.7 3.0 4.0 HDF 850.1 IRAM SCUBA ISOCAM 1.3 mm 850 µm (mJy) (mJy) 15 µm (µJy) 8 × 105 180 0.3 0.5 0.8 800 1.2 2.0 2.1 18 1.7 0.8 < 23 2.2 7.0 observed Values are scaled to Arp 220's observed spectrum: radio: Sopp & Alexander (1991), millimeter: Downes & Solomon (1998), far-IR: Rigopoulou et al. (1996); Fischer et al. (1998); Klaas et al. (1997), near-IR: Soifer et al. (1999). < 23 As noted by Carilli & Yun (1999), however, the submm-to-radio index has a large scatter, so it should be regarded more as a redshift indicator rather than a red- shift estimator in the sense of the optical photometric red- shifts. In particular, for the high-z dust sources detected to date, there is not only a large scatter in the 350/1.4 GHz index, but also possible contamination of the radio flux by emission from an AGN, and modification of the ratio due to differential magnification effects of gravitational lens- ing. For example, IRAS F10214+4724, at z = 2.3, has an index α350 1.4 = 0.7, and APM 08279+5255, at higher red- shift (z = 3.9) has nearly the same index, α350 1.4 = 0.8. Both of these indices would be compatible with z < 2, given the scatter in the index data. 7. Conclusions 1) The IRAM interferometer has detected the source HDF 850.1, the strongest source in the submm survey of the Hubble Deep Field by Hughes et al. (1998). We measure a flux of 2.2± 0.3 mJy, in agreement with the flux density measured at 1.35 mm at the James Clerk Maxwell Tele- scope. The 1.3 mm flux, together with our non-detections at 2.8 and 3.4 mm, and the SCUBA flux at 850 µm, are all consistent with the interpretation by Hughes et al. (1998) that the radiation is optically thin emission by dust. 2) The improved position from the interferometer shows the dust source cannot be the optical source 3-577.0, as suggested by Hughes et al. (1998). The measured posi- tion also rules out the z = 0.299 galaxy 3-659.1 and the low surface brightness galaxy 3-633.1 at z = 1.72 sug- gested by Richards (1999) as an indentification for HDF 850.1. The dust source may coincide with the tentative VLA source 3651+1226. 3) The dust source may be associated with the optical arc-like feature 3-593.0/3-593.2, located 1.8′′ to the south- west of the z ≈ 1 elliptical galaxy 3-586.0. The arguments in favor of this interpretation are the 0.8′′ ± 0.7′′ sepa- 12 D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 ration of the dust source and 3-593 on the sky and the temperature-mass argument developed in the text, which disfavors an association of the dust source with the ellip- tical. If HDF 850.1 is at z ≈ 1.7, the photometric redshift of the optical source, then it could be an unlensed galaxy with a spectral energy distribution and linear dimensions that are similar to those of the z = 0.054 ultraluminous starburst galaxy VII Zw 31. Hence, if at z ≈ 1.7 and un- lensed, HDF 850.1 must be an ultraluminous IR galaxy, with an IR luminosity of LIR = 2 × 1012 L⊙. 4) Because of the close proximity on the sky of the el- liptical 3-586.0, the dust source HDF 850.1 may be gravi- tationally lensed. The arguments in favor of this interpre- tation are the arclike morphology of the optical source that suggests a gravitational mirage; the similarity of the prop- erties of the elliptical galaxy to the ones responsible for the lensing in IRAS F10214+4724, HST 14176+5226, and the Cloverleaf; and the fact that many of the other high- redshift objects detected to date at mm/sub-mm wave- lengths in dust and CO are magnified by gravitational lensing. The arguments against this interpretation are that the arc morphology is not conclusive, and that the candi- date counterimage, 3-577.0, has a different B − V color, and apparently a different redshift. The discussion in this paper illustrates the absolute necessity of sensitive millimeter/submillimeter interferom- eters for identifying sources of dust emission with cosmo- logically distant optical galaxies. The next step in this di- rection is the construction of a mm/submm interferometer with more than an order of magnitude greater sensitivity than presently available. Acknowledgements. We thank the operators on Plateau de Bure for their help in observing, M. Bremer (IRAM) for some of the image processing, and H. Aussel (CEA-Saclay), M. Dickinson (STSci), A. Fern´andez-Soto (Univ. New South Wales), J.-P. Kneib (Obs. Midi-Pyr´en´ees), E. Richards (Univ. Virginia), P.A. Shaver (ESO), and S. Zepf (Yale Univ.) for very useful comments. We also thank the referee, A. Omont, for his helpful suggestions on improving the paper. Appendix: The cm-radio source 3651+1221 Richards et al. (1998) tentatively associated the VLA source 3651+1221 with the z = 0.299 galaxy 3-659.1 (cf. Fig. 4). This galaxy may also be the 15 µm source HDF PM3 29 detected with ISOCAM (Aussel et al. 1999). Richards (1999) showed however that the radio emission is confined to the faint emission north of the spiral, about 1′′ south of the optical object 3-633.1, which has a pho- tometric redshift of 1.72 (Fern´andez-Soto et al. 1999). Since then, this optical object has been detected in J and H bands, having colors consistent with a high-z galaxy (Dickinson 1998). Richards (1999) noted that if the ra- dio source is at z ∼ 1.7, the implied radio luminosity is substantially higher than that of the most extreme local starbursts like Arp 220, which suggests the radio source may be an AGN. There is a 3-sigma contour near the spiral galaxy on the IRAM 1.3 mm map (Fig. 4), which we list in Ta- ble 1 as a questionable source. The 1.3 mm position is 1′′ south of the VLA source. The apparent 1.3 mm flux density is 0.75 mJy, but this would have to be corrected for the primary beam attenuation to ∼ 1.2 mJy if the source were real. In this case, the emission could not be the extrapolation of the synchrotron spectrum from cen- timeter wavelengths, because the flux density at 3.4 cm is only 16 µJy (Richards et al. 1998). Could it be dust emis- sion from the spiral? The problem with dust emission at low redshifts (z ∼ 0.3) is that most of the energy is at shorter wavelengths, not redshifted into the mm /submm bands. The dust in the central parts of the Milky Way, or in NGC 891, corresponding to a molecular gas mass of 1.5 × 109 M⊙, would yield a 1.3 mm flux of only 68 µJy at z = 0.299, or ∼ 20 times lower than the apparent flux on the 1.3 mm map. The apparent 3σ signal would thus have to come from an extremely gas-rich galaxy, which is not in any way indicated by the HST optical image of this relatively nearby object. Since there is also a 3σ negative peak at a similar radius from the center of the primary beam (Fig. 1), the apparent 3σ positive signal may not be real. References Aussel, H., Cesarsky, C.J., Elbaz, D., & Starck, J.L. 1999, A&A, 342, 313 Barger, A.J., Cowie, L.L., & Sanders, D.B. 1999a, ApJ, 518, (June 10) in press Barger, A.J., Cowie, L.L., Smail, I., Ivison, R.J., Blain, A.W., & Kneib, J.-P. 1999b, AJ, (June 1999) in press (astro- ph/9903142) Blain, A.W. 1997, MNRAS, 290, 553 Blain, A.W. 1998, MNRAS, 295, 92 Blain, A.W., Kneib, J.-P., Ivison, R.J., & Smail, I. 1999, ApJ, 512, L87 Carilli, C.L., & Yun, M.S. 1999, ApJ, 513, L13 Chae, K.-H., & Turnshek, D.A. 1999, ApJ, 514, 587 Cimatti, A., Andreani, P., Rottgering, H., & Tilanus, R. 1998, Nature, 392, 895 Clark, B.G. 1980, A&A, 89, 377 Condon, J.J., Helou, G., Sanders, D.B., & Soifer, B.T. 1996, ApJS, 103, 81 Cowie, L. 1999, http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/∼cowie/tts /hdf42.html Crampton, D., Le F`evre, O., Hammer, F., & Lilly, S.J. 1996, A&A, 307, L53 Dey, A., Graham, J.R., Ivison, R.J., Smail, I., Wright, G.S., & Liu, M.C. 1999, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/9902044) Dickinson, M. 1998, in The Hubble Deep Field, ed. M. Livio, S.M. Fall, & P. Madau, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 219 Djorgovski, S., de Carvalho, R.R., & Thompson, D.J. 1990, AJ, 99, 1414 Downes, D., Radford, S.J.E., Greve, A., Thum, C., Solomon, P.M., & Wink, J.E. 1992, ApJ, 398, L25 D. Downes et al.: Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1 13 Downes, D., Solomon, P.M., & Radford, S.J.E. 1993, ApJ, 414, Richards, E.A. 1999, ApJ, 513, L9 L13 Downes, D., & Solomon, P.M. 1998, ApJ, 507, 615 Eales, S., Lilly, S., Gear, W., Dunne, L., Bond, J.R., Hammer, (http://www.cv.nrao.edu/∼jkempner/vla-hdf) Richards, E.A., Kellermann, K.I., Fomalont, E.B., Windhorst, R.A., & Partridge, R.B. 1998, AJ, 116, 1039 F., Le F`evre, O., & Crampton, D. 1999, ApJ, 515, 518 Rigopoulou, D., Lawrence, A., & Rowan-Robinson, M. 1996, Eisenhardt, P.R., Armus, L., Hogg, D.W., Soifer, B.T., Neuge- MNRAS, 278, 1049 bauer, G., & Werner, M.W. 1996, ApJ, 461, 72 Evans, A.S., Scoville, N.Z., Dinshaw, N., Armus, L., Soifer, B.T., Neugebauer, G., & Rieke, M. 1999, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/9812196) Fasano, G., Christiani, S., Arnouts, S., & Filippi, M. 1998, AJ, 115, 1400 Fern´andez-Soto, A., Lanzetta, K.M., & Yahil, A. 1999, ApJ, 513, 34 (http://bat.phys.unsw.edu.au/∼fsoto/hdfcat.html) Fischer, J., Satyapal, S., Luhman, M.L., Melnick, G., Cox, P., Cernicharo, J., Stacey, G.J., Smith, H.A., Lord, S.D., & Greenhouse, M.A. 1998, in ISO to the Peaks, ed., M. Kessler & M. Perry, Noordwijk: ESTEC, in press Frayer, D.T., Ivison, R.J., Scoville, N.Z., Yun, M., Evans, A.S., Rivolo, A.R., & Solomon, P.M. 1988, in Molecular Clouds in the Milky Way and External Galaxies, ed. R.L. Dickman, R.L. Snell, & J.S. Young, Heidelberg: Springer, 42 Rowan-Robinson, M. 1999, in preparation Rowan-Robinson, M., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 490 Sanders, D.B., Soifer, B.T., Elias, J.H., Madore, B.F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., & Scoville, N.Z. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74 Sawicki, M.J., Lin, H., & Yee, H.K.C. 1997, AJ, 113, 1; (http://www.astro.utoronto.ca/∼sawicki/) Soifer, B.T., Neugebauer, G., Matthews, K., Becklin, E.E., Ressler, M., Werner, M.W., Weinberger, A.J., & Egami, E. 1999, ApJ, 513, 207 Smail, I., Blain, A.W., & Kneib, J.-P. 1998, ApJ, 506, L7 Solomon, P.M., Downes, D., Radford, S.J.E., & Barrett, J.W. Frayer, D.T., Ivison, R.J., Scoville, N.Z., Evans, A.S., Yun, M.S., Smail, I., Barger, A.J., Blain, A.W., & Kneib, J.-P. 1999, ApJ, 514, L13 1997, ApJ, 478, 144 Sopp, H.M., & Alexander, P. 1991, MNRAS, 251, 112 Surace, J.A., Sanders, D.B., Vacca, W.D., Veilleux, S., & Maz- Gu´elin, M., Zylka, R., Mezger, P.G., Haslam, C.G.T., Kreysa, zarella, J.M. 1998, ApJ, 492, 116 E., Lemke, R., & Sievers, A.W. 1993, A&A 279, L37 Trentham, N., Kormendy, J., & Sanders, D.B. 1999, AJ, in Gwyn, S.D.J., & Hartwick, F.D.A. 1996, ApJ, 468, L77 press (astro-ph/9901382) (http:/uvastro.phys.uvic.ca/grads/gwyn) Turnshek, D.A., Lupie, O.L., Rao, S.M., Espey, B.R., & Sirola, Hjorth, J., & Kneib, J.-P. 1999, ApJ, in press Hogg, D.W., Blandford, R., Kundi´c, T., Fassnacht, C.D., & C.J. 1997, ApJ, 485, 100 Wang, Y., Bahcall, N., & Turner, E.L. 1998, AJ, 116, 2081; Malhotra, S. 1996, ApJ, 467, L73 ftp.astro.princeton.edu, cd elt/:HDF Hughes, D.H., Dunlop, J.S., & Rawlings, S. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 766 Hughes, D., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 241 Ivison, R.J., Smail, I., Le Borgne, J.-F., Blain, A.W., Kneib, J.-P., & B´ezecourt, J., Kerr, T.H., & Davies, J.K. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 583 Kim, D.-C., & Sanders, D.B. 1998, ApJS, 119, 41 Klaas, U., Haas, M., Heinrichsen, I., & Schulz, B. 1997, A&A, 325, L21 Knapp, G.R. 1999, in Star Formation in Early-Type Galaxies, ed. P. Carral & J. Cepa, San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pacific, in press Kneib, J.-P., Alloin, D., Mellier, Y., Guilloteau, S., Barvainis, R., & Antonucci, R. 1998a, A&A, 329, 827 Kneib, J.-P., Alloin, D., & Pell´o, R. 1998b, A&A, 339, L65 Krugel, E., & Siebenmorgen, R. 1994, A&A, 288, 929 Lanzetta, K.M., Yahil, A., & Fern´andez-Soto, A. 1996, Nature, 381, 759 Lilly, S.J., Eales, S.A., Gear, W.K.P., Hammer, F., Le F`evre, O., Crampton, D., Bond, J.R., & Dunne, L. 1999, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/9901047) Mann, R.G., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 482 Mazzarella, J.M., et al. 1999, in preparation Mobasher, B., Rowan-Robinson, M., Georgakakis, A., & Eaton, N. 1996, MNRAS, 282, L7 Patnaik, A.R., Browne, I.W.A., Wilkinson, P.N., & Wrobel, J.M. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 655 Peacock, J.A. 1999, Cosmological Physics, Cambridge: Cam- bridge Univ. Press, 106 Ratnatunga, K.U., Ostrander, E.J., Griffiths, R.E., & Im, M. 1995, ApJ, 453, L5 Wiklind, T., & Henkel, C. 1995, A&A, 297, L71 Williams, R.E., et al. 1996, AJ, 112, 1335 Wilner, D.J., & Wright, M.C.H. 1997, ApJ, 488, L67 Wink, J.E., Duvert, G., Guilloteau, S., Gusten, R., Walmsley, C.M., & Wilson, T.L. 1994, A&A, 281, 505 Wyrowski, F., Hofner, P., Schilke, P., Walmsley, C.M., Wilner, D.J., & Wink, J.E. 1997, A&A, 320, L17 Wyrowski, F., Schilke, P., Walmsley, C.M., & Menten, K.M. 1999, ApJ, 514, L43 Zepf, S.E., Moustakas, L.A., & Davis, M. 1997, ApJ, 474, L1 This article was processed by the author using Springer-Verlag LaTEX A&A style file L-AA version 3.
astro-ph/9711209	1	9711	1997-11-18T20:01:43	Fluctuations in the Extragalactic Background Light: Analysis of the Hubble Deep Field	[ "astro-ph" ]	(Abridged) Statistical analysis of the unresolved light in the Hubble Deep Field (HDF) strongly constrains possible sources of the optical Extragalactic Background Light (EBL). To test for the statistical signature of previously undetected sources, we estimate the auto, cross, and color correlations of the ``sky'' in the HDF that remains after masking objects brighter than I=30 mag. This measurement yields the most stringent limits to date on small-scale structure in the night sky; analysis of shallower imaging would be dominated by galaxies now detected by the HDF. Unless there is a truly uniform optical background, the mean EBL is likely to be within a small fraction of the surface brightness from detected galaxies. No currently plausible sources of additional EBL satisfy the constraints that they (1) would not have already been detected, (2) contribute EBL comparable to that from detected galaxies, and (3) do not produce EBL fluctuations in excess of the upper limits set by correlations in the HDF.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Fluctuations in the Extragalactic Background Light: Analysis of the Hubble Deep Field1 Submitted to ApJ Michael S. Vogeley2 Princeton University Observatory Princeton, NJ 08544-1001 [email protected] ABSTRACT Statistical analysis of the unresolved light in the Hubble Deep Field (HDF) strongly constrains possible sources of the optical Extragalactic Background Light (EBL). This constraint is crucial for determining the spectrum of the EBL because reported upper limits on the optical EBL are several times larger than the surface brightness from detected galaxies, suggesting the possibility of additional galaxy populations. To test for the statistical signature of previously undetected sources, we estimate the auto, cross, and color correlations of the "sky" in the HDF that remains after masking objects brighter than I814 = 30mag. Auto and cross correlations of surface brightness in the V606 and I814 bandpasses are well-fitted by ω(θ) ∼ 10−6(θ/1′′)−0.6 up to 10′′. Probable contributions of several instrumental systematics ensure that these correlations are firm upper limits on the true EBL fluctuations. This measurement yields the most stringent limits to date on small-scale structure in the night sky; analysis of shallower imaging would be dominated by galaxies now detected by the HDF. Unless there is a truly uniform optical background, the mean EBL is likely to be within a small fraction of the surface brightness from detected galaxies. No currently plausible sources of additional EBL satisfy the constraints that they (1) would not have already been detected, (2) contribute EBL comparable to that from detected galaxies, and (3) do not produce EBL fluctuations in excess of the upper limits set by correlations in the HDF. These constraints admit only 1 Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, under NASA contract NAS 5-26555 2 Hubble Fellow -- 2 -- a confusion-limited population of extremely low surface brightness objects that is disjoint from the parameter space of all detected galaxies. Extrapolation of detected galaxy counts to zero flux would add only a few percent to the EBL. Diffuse intergalactic light clustered similarly to faint galaxies could explain some of the observed correlations but would contribute at most a few ×10% to the mean EBL. Subject headings: evolution -- methods: statistical cosmology: observations -- galaxies: clustering -- galaxies: 1. INTRODUCTION The Extragalactic Background Light (EBL) is the surface brightness of the night sky from all extragalactic sources, integrated out to the first epoch of star formation. The ultimate goal of studying the EBL is to complete the resolution of Olbers's paradox by measuring the spectrum of the EBL, identifying the sources that contribute to it, and accounting for their evolution. Constraints on the optical EBL are particularly important because these bandpasses are sensitive to rest-frame UV flux from galaxies at z > 1, when we now believe the bulk of star formation in the universe occurred (Madau et al. 1996; Connolly et al. 1997). Thus, measurement of the spectrum of the optical EBL is a critical test for models of the star formation history of the universe (see, e.g., Whitrow & Yallop 1965; Partridge & Peebles 1967a,b; Fall, Charlot, & Pei 1996; Vaisanen 1996; Madau et al. 1997). Models for the sources of the EBL must also correctly predict statistical fluctuations in the EBL, which reflect the surface brightness profiles and clustering of these sources. [For an extensive review on the optical EBL that predates the HDF, see Tyson 1995.] The average surface brightness of the sky from detected galaxies sets a firm lower limit on the mean EBL, µEBL ≥ µgalaxies (here and throughout this paper, µ is an average surface brightness). Tremendous progress has been made in detecting faint galaxies, through deep surveys such as the Hubble Deep Field (Williams et al. 1996) and the near-IR survey by Djorgovski et al. (1995), which reach as faint as V = 29.5mag and K = 24mag, respectively. However, it is unclear what fraction of the mean optical EBL the detected galaxies comprise, because the uncertainties in the mean level of the optical EBL are larger than the surface brightness contributed by these galaxies. In addition, the systematic bias of object detection against relatively diffuse, low surface brightness objects leaves open the possibility that we may have missed a substantial fraction of the optical luminosity density in the universe (Disney 1976; McGaugh et al. 1995; Dalcanton 1997). -- 3 -- Figure 1 shows various observational constraints on the mean EBL. The inset box plots only the optical limits, using linear axes. Solid symbols indicate lower limits on the EBL in several bandpasses from the average sky brightness contributed by detected galaxies, µgalaxies. In optical bandpasses, these lower limits include galaxy counts from the HDF and brighter counts from previous surveys (compilation by Pozzetti et al. 1997). UV galaxy counts are from Milliard et al. (1992). Open circles with 1σ uncertainties show a recent detection of the mean optical EBL (Bernstein 1997; Bernstein, Freedman, & Madore 1998). Arrows are upper limits from various experiments (Paresce 1990; Toller 1983; Dube, Wickes, & Wilkinson 1977, 1979; Hauser 1996), where the upper bound in each case is set primarily by uncertainties in foreground subtraction. Other bounds on the optical EBL (not plotted here) include experiments by Roach & Smith (1968), Lillie (1968), Spinrad & Stone (1978), Boughn & Kuhn (1986), and Mattila (1990). Precise measurement of the mean level of the EBL is extremely difficult because several foreground sources, particularly Zodiacal light, are at least an order of magnitude brighter than the mean optical EBL. At optical wavelengths, uncertainties in the mean EBL leave room for considerable surface brightness above the lower limits set by galaxy detections. The 2σ uncertainties of the optical EBL detection by Bernstein et al. span the range from µEBL ∼ 0 to µEBL ∼ 5µgalaxies. The gap between previous upper limits on the EBL and the galaxy surface brightness is of order 4 − 10. These uncertainties prompt us to examine the plausibility of an additional contribution to the EBL that is comparable to the surface brightness from detected galaxies with magnitude V < 29.5mag. Could this flux arise from fainter galaxies? The surface brightness per magnitude depends on the number counts as dIν/dm = (dN/dm)(Igal(m)) ∝ 10(α−0.4)m. If we extrapolate the galaxy number counts to infinitely faint limits, assuming the logarithmic count slope α = 0.2 at the HDF limit, then all galaxies with V > 29.5mag would contribute only an additional 1.6% to the EBL. If, strangely, the number counts turn up to α = 0.3 beyond V = 29.5mag, then this contribution rises to 3.3%. Thus, it seems unlikely that galaxies fainter than the HDF limit contribute significant flux. However, this does not rule out objects that evade direct detection, e.g., galaxies with total magnitude V < 29.5 and very low central surface brightness, or a diffuse intergalactic component. If a substantial fraction of the EBL resides in sources that now lie below the detection limits of deep optical imaging, this population might be inferred from its statistical signature in the object-masked "sky." The internal profiles of sources and clustering among them will cause correlations in the sky brightness. Differences between the spectra of these sources and the average sky brightness will yield corresponding fluctuations in color (for HST observations, the "average sky" is primarily Zodiacal light, for ground-based observations there is also a strong atmospheric component). -- 4 -- To constrain possible sources of additional EBL, we compute the angular autocorrelation function of the unresolved light in the Hubble Deep Field. In other words, we constrain additional sources of EBL by studying the correlation properties of the flux that cannot be assigned with large statistical significance to individual objects. Fluctuation analysis of the sky brightness is complementary to direct measurement of the mean EBL; although the uncertainties in direct measurement would permit a large EBL component in addition to detected galaxies, the small amplitude of the sky fluctuations rules out many plausible candidates for such a component. For example, we can statistically test the proposition that previously undetected low surface brightness galaxies comprise most of the EBL (Vaisanen 1996). This approach is insensitive to a truly uniform optical background, but the most plausible source of the EBL is emission from stars, which are likely to be clustered. At large redshift, we observe these in the rest-frame UV, where most of the stellar flux is from O and B stars. Regions of active star formation are extremely clumpy, so we expect the flux to be strongly correlated. The approach of studying the correlation properties of the unresolved optical background was pioneered by Shectman (1974), who used Schmidt plates to detect optical EBL fluctuations on several arcminute scales. Shectman detected an EBL power spectrum that was consistent with clustering of galaxies fainter than R = 18, as predicted by Gunn (1965) and Shectman (1973). Tyson (1988) found evidence for residual surface brightness fluctuations in deep B band CCD images after cleaning detected B < 27mag galaxies and smoothing on a scale of 6′′. Cole, Treyer, & Silk (1992) examined how fluctuation analysis of deep optical images might constrain faint galaxy populations. Martin & Bowyer (1989) detected arcminute-scale fluctuations with a rocket-borne UV detector, which indicated the presence of a UV background from galaxies. Boughn, Saulson, & Uson (1986) measured the beam-to-beam variance of the sky flux at 2.2µm to set upper limits on galaxy counts in the infrared, assuming a model for the galaxy clustering. Jenkins & Reid (1991) also measured sky fluctuations at 2.2µm to test galaxy evolution models. Recently, Kashlinsky et al. (1997) applied a fluctuation analysis to the DIRBE sky maps to set constraints on the infrared background. Fluctuations at zero lag have long been used to constrain the number count distribution of radio sources (Scheuer 1957; Hewish 1961; Condon 1974; see, e.g., Fomalont et al. 1988 for a recent result). Hasinger et al. (1993) computed limits on the X-ray flux distribution in deep ROSAT images and several analyses have been performed to measure the correlation function of the X-ray background, as observed by HEAO 1 (Persic et al. 1989) and Einstein (Barcons & Fabian 1989). In this paper we use the Hubble Deep Field to probe the correlation structure of the night sky after masking all detected objects and thereby establish constraints on possible sources of the optical EBL. Section 2 presents estimates of the auto and cross correlation -- 5 -- of the unresolved sky in the Hubble Deep Field. Section 3 discusses possible contributions to these measurement from foregrounds and instrumental systematics. In Section 4 we use these results to set stringent limits on the types of additional galaxy populations that might lie hidden below current detection limits and examine if some of the measured correlation signal may be caused by weakly clustered intergalactic light. Section 5 reviews our conclusions. We quote all HDF magnitudes in the AB system (Oke & Gunn 1983), defined as AB = −2.5 log fν − 48.60, where fν is in units of erg/s/cm2/Hz. Distances are in h−1Mpc, where the Hubble constant is 100hkm s−1 Mpc−1. 2. EBL FLUCTUATIONS IN THE HUBBLE DEEP FIELD 2.1. Treatment of the HDF Data We analyze the drizzled version 2 images of the HDF observed through the Wide Field cameras (WF) in the F450W, F606W, and F814W filters (hereafter we refer to these bandpasses as B450, V606, and I814, respectively). Except for corrections to the flat field calibration (see below), we use the data as reduced and processed by the HDF team (Williams et al. 1996). We analyze only the central one-quarter of the area (roughly 41′′ × 41′′) of each drizzled image, to minimize the possible impact of residual large-scale gradients, and structure in the dark counts due to fluorescence of the MgF2 window (Burrows et al. 1995). [For further details of the HDF, see http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/science/hdf/hdf.html.] We apply corrections to the version 2 HDF images to remove large-scale gradients that are apparent after object-masking and smoothing of the remaining sky. Comparison of these features with ratio images formed from the v2 flat field calibrations and more recent calibration files (the latter are the calibration files currently used in the WPFC2 pipeline) indicate that the gradients are caused by errors in the v2 calibrations. To remove these features we smooth the flat field ratio images (to remove small-scale noise) and multiply them into the HDF images. These gradients are quite small, typically 0.5% across an entire WF image, and are not expected to affect photometry of individual objects, because algorithms such as FOCAS estimate the sky level near each object. We remove these gradients because we are interested in detecting r.m.s. fluctuations in the sky at the level of 0.1%. In section we discuss the possible contribution of residual flat field uncertainty to the apparent sky fluctuations. To prepare an object-masked image, we use the HDF version 2 FOCAS catalog to identify sources with total magnitudes brighter than I814 = 30 (Williams et al. estimate the -- 6 -- HDF to be 80% complete to I814 = 29), which includes virtually every object in the catalog. For comparison, we also derive catalogs from the HDF using the SExtractor package (Bertin & Arnouts 1996); we find the mask structure to be relatively insensitive to the choice of catalog and choose the available v2 FOCAS catalog to allow others to reproduce our results. The same mask, derived from detections in the summed V606 + I814 image, is used for all filters. For each object we flag the pixels that lie within an ellipse that is twice as large as the area used by FOCAS to compute the "total magnitude." The FOCAS "total magnitude area" is always at least twice the area within the detection isophote, so the masked area is at least four times as large as the isophotal detection region. Smoothing of the masked images on a range of scales does not reveal residual "doughnuts" around the masked objects. This masking procedure removes 30% of the pixels in each WF image. Therefore it does not appear that the sky is confusion-limited to the isophotal detection threshold of ∼ 27 mag/arcsec2 that was used for the FOCAS catalog. 2.2. Correlation Analysis The field of view of the WF cameras is well-matched to probing EBL fluctuations caused by the correlation structure of galaxy profiles. The WF cameras each have a 80′′ field of view of and 0.1′′ pixel scale. At redshift z = 1, 1′′ corresponds to 8.5kpc (Ω = 1 and H0 = 50km/s). On these angular scales, the clustering amplitude of I814 < 29 galaxies is ω(1′′) ∼< 0.1 (Colley et al. 1996; Villumsen et al. 1997). This weak clustering implies that small-scale fluctuations in the EBL will be dominated by the surface brightness profiles of faint objects rather than by the clustering among them. For observed surface brightness µ(x), we define the autocorrelation function C(θ) = hµ(x)µ(x + θ)i − µ2, (1) where µ = hµ(x)i. We often refer to the mean surface brightness µ as the mean "sky" brightness (after masking detected objects, µ corresponds to the usual definition of a "sky level"). We use Cartesian coordinates x, with θ = x − x′, because the relative angles in the HDF satisfy θ ≪ 1. The surface brightness autocorrelation may be written as the product of a dimensionless autocorrelation function and the square of the mean sky brightness C(θ) = µ2ω(θ). (2) To prepare an image for correlation analysis, we compute the mean value of the unmasked pixels and subtract this mean from the image, set pixels within the object ellipses to zero, and taper the edges of the image with a cosine bell function. To estimate the -- 7 -- autocorrelation function, we compute the Fourier transform of the image, square the moduli of the Fourier coefficients (for cross correlations, we compute the modulus of the products of the images' Fourier coefficients) and correct these amplitudes for the effective area of the image after masking and weighting. We then inverse Fourier transform this two-dimensional power spectrum to produce the two-dimensional autocorrelation function. Averaging over all angles yields the function C(θ). Computation of C(θ) by direct summation of the products of the pixel values yields identical results (but uses significantly more CPU cycles). Analysis of test images with known power spectra confirm that we recover the true signal, after correcting for the integral constraint bias. The integral constraint bias arises because we estimate the mean surface brightness µ from the image itself. The implicit assumption that the ensemble average of µ is identical to the mean within the image is equivalent to assuming that there are no fluctuations of the mean surface brightness between different images. This bias causes us to underestimate the autocorrelation by the integral average of the true autocorrelation function over the area Ω of the image, ∆ = (3) 1 Ω2 Z d2xZ d2x′ ωtrue(x − x′), where ωtrue is the true dimensionless autocorrelation function. Figure 2 shows the dimensionless autocorrelation function of the object-masked HDF "sky" in each of the three bandpasses. In each case, we average the results for the WF2, 3, and 4 fields. Representative error bars are attached to the V606 curve only and are estimated from the variation among the three fields and within bins of width δ(log10 θ) = 0.4. Near zero lag, the signal is dominated by photon shot noise over the scale of the 0.1′′ WF pixels. On scales from 0.15′′ to 8′′, these autocorrelation functions are well fitted by a power law C(θ) = µ2ω(1′′)(θ/1′′)γ, (4) with γ ∼ −0.6. Table 1 summarizes the power law fits and their uncertainties. At 1′′, the typical fluctuation is ω(1′′) ∼ 10−6, i.e., an r.m.s. correlated fluctuation of ∼ 0.1% of the mean sky brightness, or ∼ 30.5 mag/arcsec2 in V606. The turnover of ω(θ) on scales ∼> 10′′ is consistent with the integral constraint bias that we expect for a power law correlation function over a field of this size. Using the power law fits in Table 1, we integrate equation (3) over a 41′′ × 41′′ field and find that the correlation functions in Figure 2 are underestimated by approximately ∆ ∼ 4 × 10−7 (note heavy solid bar in Figure 2). What could account for the power law shape of these correlations? In section 3 we discuss several instrumental systematics and foregrounds that might contribute to the -- 8 -- measured correlations. We note that the unmasked wings of the point spread function might cause correlations with similar shape to those plotted in Figure 2. To explain the shape of the correlation function with extragalactic sources, one can imagine an unclustered population of sources of different scale size such that the sum of their autocorrelations yields a power law. Alternatively, the similarity of the power law index, γ ∼ −0.6, to that observed for galaxy clustering, γ ∼ −0.8, suggests that the clustering of sources causes the power law shape. However, because we have reason to believe that systematics affect this measurement, it is premature to fit such models. If we only mask galaxies brighter than I = 26mag, rather than I < 30mag, we find autocorrelations at θ < 0.5′′ that are an order of magnitude above the curves in Figure 2. This test indicates that fluctuation analysis of shallower imaging data would be dominated by the profiles of galaxies detected by the HDF. In ground-based imaging, this small-scale correlation structure would be smeared by seeing and the correlation signal from the profiles of galaxies in the magnitude range 26 < I814 < 29 would be overwhelmingly larger than the signal measured in the HDF. In other words, the HDF is the first data set in which we could have detected a signal as weak as that shown in Figure 2. One might worry that, just as correlations in shallower imaging would be dominated by galaxies below the detection threshold, galaxies just fainter than the HDF limit dominate the observed correlations; in section 4 we show that this is not the case. Cross correlations of images in different filters and comparison of these results with the respective autocorrelations provide a critical test of the nature of the observed fluctuations. Dot-dashed curves in Figure 2 show cross correlations of B450 vs. V606 and V606 vs. I814. The cross correlations are shown as ω(θ) = C1×2(θ)/(µ1µ2), where µ1 and µ2 are the mean sky levels. The photon count shot noise spike near zero lag is absent in the cross correlations because this source of noise is uncorrelated between the different images. Absence of this spike shows that the power law behavior of the correlations extends down to the smallest scale that we observe. This smallest scale is 0.04′′ rather than the 0.1′′ scale of the WF pixels, thanks to the sub-pixel resolution recovered by drizzling (see Fruchter & Hook 1997). The close agreement between auto and cross correlations indicates that similar structure is present in different filters, in exposures that were obtained at different times. The relative amplitudes are consistent with a common origin for most of the fluctuations in all three filters, with some extra signal in the B450 and I814 images that is not present in V606 (V606 also has the highest signal-to-noise ratio). The dimensionless correlations in Figure 2 represent fluctuations relative to the mean sky level, thus the good match between correlations in different filters implies that the color of the fluctuating component must be close to that of the mean sky. It is important to remember that, because the mean sky is -- 9 -- much brighter than any possible EBL component, an instrumental systematic that varies slowly with wavelength could cause correlated structure with the same color as the mean sky. We have also computed the autocorrelation function of the color of the unresolved sky, i.e., the ratio of surface brightness in different bandpasses (note that this is the ratio of measured surface brightness before subtracting the mean sky). Color correlations of the B450/V606 and V606/I814 ratio images, expressed as ω(θ) = C1/2(θ)/(µ1/µ2)2, have slightly smaller amplitude and steeper slope than the auto and cross correlations. Color correlations should be relatively less affected by flatfield uncertainties because any wavelength-independent flatfield structure is divided out in forming the ratio image. We will report in detail on these results in Paper II (Vogeley 1998). An important point is that we expect the amplitude of color correlations to be smaller than the individual filter autocorrelations by a factor that strongly depends on the relative color of the sources of the fluctuations and the mean sky. Here we note only that the detection of color correlation of the same order as the auto and cross correlations argues against a dominant systematic contribution from flatfield errors. 3. INSTRUMENTAL SYSTEMATICS AND FOREGROUND SOURCES Several instrumental systematics and foreground sources may contribute to the clustering signal plotted in Figure 2. These effects include errors in calibration of the instrument sensitivity, smearing by the point spread function (PSF) of the telescope, wide-angle scattered light, and fluctuations in the Zodiacal and Galactic foregrounds. Because these systematics and foregrounds only add to the measured clustering signal, we may use the observed correlations as a firm upper limit on the true EBL fluctuations; this is the approach that we follow in Section 4 below. If we identify an instrumental effect that contributes to the fluctuations and subtract this contribution, then we obtain an even stronger constraint on additional sources of the EBL. For example, we have already been able to remove some signal by correction for obvious flatfield errors, and preliminary analysis clearly indicates a contribution from scattering by the telescope PSF. In Paper II we provide a detailed analysis of these possible contributions, with the goal of improving these upper limits. -- 10 -- 3.1. HST/WFPC2 Systematics Errors in calibration of spatial variations in the instrument sensitivity will cause apparent fluctuations in the sky. As noted above, smoothing of the object-masked sky revealed large-scale features in the v2 HDF images, which we removed using better flat field calibrations. Color correlation analysis removes signal caused by wavelength-independent flatfield errors, but this does not rule out a wavelength-dependent component. Another test is to compare the two-dimensional autocorrelation structure of the flatfields themselves with the detected signal. If the uncertainties in the flatfields are proportional to the flatfields themselves, then features in their two-dimensional autocorrelations will show up in the sky correlations. In addition to cross-correlating the flat field images with the data directly, we can compare the multipole moments of their two-dimensional autocorrelation functions. Preliminary analyses do not reveal cross correlations or anisotropies that are characteristic of flat field errors. Measurement of the multipole moments can also reveal problems caused by charge transfer efficiency or other defects aligned with the CCD rows or columns, which cause a quadrapole signal. Scattered light from the HST secondary mirror support spider creates an "X" pattern that would yield a large hexadecapole moment. The point spread function of the WFPC2 has extended wings, which probably arise from scattering inside the cameras (Krist & Burrows 1994; Krist 1995; Burrows et al. 1995). This PSF is anisotropic and varies with position within each camera. For our purpose, the most important effect of the PSF wings is to scatter some flux well beyond the mask region of an object. A crude test for this effect is to make an image in which we place a model of the PSF at the position of each detected object, with amplitude proportional to the measured magnitude, then mask this image as we do for the data and cross-correlate with the masked HDF image. Preliminary results from this and similar tests (such as varying the mask size) indicate that this effect produces correlations with shape that is similar to the HDF correlations and could contribute as much as 10 − 40% of the observed correlation amplitude. This may be the dominant systematic effect on our measurement. However, it is difficult to cleanly separate this PSF effect. Similar effects would arise if the profiles of detected galaxies extend far beyond the masked regions (i.e., if the sky is confusion-limited in these galaxies at some very faint isophote), or if lower surface brightness objects are clustered with the detected galaxies. The dark count rate in the WFPC2 varies both spatially and temporally (Burrows et al. 1995). These variations are probably caused by fluorescence of the MgF2 window on the camera. At fixed epoch, the dark count rate is constant within the central region of each field, but declines near the edges of the CCD. The amplitude of the dark count rate, and -- 11 -- therefore the steepness of the roll-off, varies in time with the cosmic ray flux. To minimize sensitivity to this effect, we restrict our analysis to the central one-quarter of the area of each CCD. The drizzling procedure that was used to combine the HDF exposures includes corrections for the geometric field distortion in each camera. Restricting our analysis to the central area of each field also minimizes sensitivity to residuals from this distortion. 3.2. Foreground Sources The motion of the Earth relative to the source of the Zodiacal light causes fluctuations in this foreground to be decorrelated between WFPC2 exposures. The Zodiacal light is Solar flux that is backscattered from a layer of dust that extends to roughly 3 A.U. (Dermott et al. 1996; Reach et al. 1996). In the time it takes for HST to orbit the Earth (96 minutes), the Earth's motion around the Sun changes the HST's line of sight through this dust layer. During the month of December (when the HDF was observed), the line of sight through a screen at a distance of 3 A.U. towards a fixed extrasolar target at 12h37m +62◦13′ (the position of the HDF) changes by ∼ 2′. The field of view of a WF camera is ∼ 1.25′, therefore sky brightness fluctuations due to the Zodiacal foreground become decorrelated if we examine fluctuations by cross correlating WFPC2 exposures that are separated in time by at least the duration of one orbit. Exposures in different filters were separated by many orbits, thus cross correlations of images in different filters should be unaffected by ZL fluctuations. The good match of auto and cross correlations indicates that ZL fluctuations do not strongly affect any of our measurements. The next brightest foreground is Galactic cirrus, which is presumably the reflection of starlight from high-latitude dust. The HDF field was chosen to lie at a minimum in the IRAS 100µm maps, thus we expect this Galactic foreground to be much smaller than average. Guhatakurta & Tyson (1989) measured the color of the Galactic cirrus and found that it is ∼ 1m redder in BJ − R than either the faint blue galaxies or the structure with surface brightness fainter than ∼ 30 mag/arcsec2 seen on scales > 6′′ by Tyson (1988). This color is similarly too red to match the color implied by the auto and cross correlations of the HDF sky (within a few tenths of a magnitude of the Zodiacal light color). However, because little is know about correlations of this foreground on scales of a few arcseconds, we cannot exclude this possibility. -- 12 -- 4. CONSTRAINTS ON SOURCES OF THE EBL 4.1. Galaxy Populations Is there a population of sources that (1) would not have been directly detected in the HDF, (2) would contribute significant surface brightness to the EBL, and (3) would not overproduce fluctuations in the EBL? If we specify the distribution of fluxes, surface brightness profiles, and angular clustering of a proposed undetected population, then we can compute the effect of these sources on fluctuations in the EBL. Using the measured correlations of the object-masked sky in the HDF as an upper limit on the true EBL fluctuations, we then test whether the predicted fluctuations are allowed by the measured sky correlations. The autocorrelation of the surface brightness from a population of sources is the sum of contributions from the correlation structure within the profiles and from clustering among the sources. For a population of sources with identical apparent surface brightness profiles µgal(θ), the autocorrelation function is Cgalaxies(θ) = ncgal(θ) + n2 Z d2x cgal(θ − x)ωclust(x). The first term is from the correlations of flux within the object profiles; cgal is the convolution of a galaxy profile with itself, cgal(θ) = Z d2x µgal(x)µgal(x + θ). (5) (6) The second term is from clustering among the galaxies, with angular two-point correlation ωclust(θ). In this subsection we assume that ωclust = 0, so that we can constrain possible EBL sources on the basis of their profiles alone. The addition of source clustering would increase the predicted EBL fluctuations and strengthen the constraints on these models. In the next subsection we examine the other extreme, a clustered diffuse EBL source. Because it does not account for absorption of flux from one galaxy by dust in another, equation (5) is exact only in the limit where the sources are transparent or sparsely distributed. If galaxies have finite optical depth then we require more sources to produce fixed optical EBL. Another effect of absorption is that clustering of sources causes a smaller increase in the EBL fluctuations because nearby galaxies tend to shield one another. A complete accounting for these effects requires specification of the redshift distribution, spectral energy distribution, and extinction law for the sources. We will examine such detailed models in Paper III. -- 13 -- Here we consider only simple phenomenological source models, in which unclustered sources have exponential surface brightness profiles with identical apparent central surface brightness µ0 and apparent angular scale length h. Such a population contributes total surface brightness µpop = nf = Eµdetect, (7) where n is the projected number density, f = 2πµ0h2 is the total flux of each source, and E is the ratio of this extra surface brightness to the surface brightness in detected galaxies to the HDF limit, µdetect (here we define µdetect, which is the same as µgalaxies defined in section 1, to avoid confusion with the additional source population). To compute the EBL fluctuations from this source population, we first compute the convolution of an exponential disk with itself, cexp(θ) = cexp(0)p(θ/h) = (cid:18)π 2 0h2(cid:19)(cid:18) 2 µ2 π Z d2u e−ue−u+θ/h(cid:19) , (8) which defines a dimensionless profile function p(θ/h) with p(0) = 1. The autocorrelation of the population is Cpop(θ) = n π 2 µ2 0h2p(θ/h) = nf 2 8πh2 p(θ/h). (9) The power law fits to the HDF correlations (Table 1) yield a constraint on the EBL fluctuations caused by this population, Cpop(θ) < Cobs(1′′)θγ (10) for all θ. Combining the equations above, we derive a constraint on the the V606 band central surface brightness µ0 and angular scale length h of these sources, µ0 < 6.3 × 10−22(h/1′′)−0.6E−1 erg/s/cm2/sr/Hz. (11) If we define an effective area πh2 for each source, then the covering factor (the average number of objects along a random line of sight) is of order χ = nπh2 = Eµdetect 2µ0 . (12) Figure 3 shows the resulting constraints on the V606 band central surface brightness µ0 and scale size h of a population of identical unclustered exponential disks that contributes mean surface brightness equal to that of detected galaxies (E = 1). The region below the solid line satisfies the constraint of equation (11). Above this line the sources' -- 14 -- autocorrelation function would exceed this upper limit for some range of θ. The right-hand axis indicates the covering factor χ for different µ0. Above the dashed line at the top of this figure lie objects directly detected in the HDF using FOCAS with an isophotal threshold of ∼ 27 mag/arcsec2. For a smaller contribution to the EBL, i.e., for E < 1, we relax the µ0 limit by 2.5 log E and change the covering factor by a factor E−1. In the limit E ∼< 0.1, the allowed region abuts the detected region. Two examples of populations that contribute µpop = µdetect and marginally satisfy the correlation constraint illustrate how very different such a population would be from the HDF detections. For h = 0.1′′ a population of extremely faint, total magnitude V606 = 32.4, sources with µ0 = 29.4 mag/arcsec2 is marginally allowed. The number of such objects, n = 1.3 × 109deg−2, is ∼ 600 times the total number per deg2 of detected galaxies. For h = 1.0′′, the correlations allow a population of V606 = 28.9mag sources, with µ0 = 30.9 mag/arcsec2. For comparison, the typical scale size of V606 = 29mag detected galaxies is ∼< 0.2′′. The projected number density of the additional V606 = 28.9mag population would be 20 times the total number of detected objects. On the righthand axis of this plot we note the covering factor that corresponds to each choice of µ0 and h. For the former example, this covering factor is χ ∼ 3, for the latter χ ∼ 13. Such large covering factors imply that these objects might be detected as QSO absorption line systems and/or from reddening of background objects. For comparison to these models, note that the most extended low surface brightness galaxy seen to date, Malin 1, has an extrapolated disk central surface brightness of µ0 = 26 mag/arcsec2 in V and scale size h = 82h−1 75 kpc (Bothun et al. 1987). At z = 0.5 this would be dimmed to roughly 28 mag/arcsec2 in I and would have an apparent scale size h = 17′′. We obtain relatively poor constraints on sources with h ∼> 10′′ because the integral constraint bias is comparable to the correlation function on these scales (see Table 1); the 41′′ × 41′′ field that we analyze is too small to accurately measure larger scale fluctuations. However, for E = 1, objects like Malin 1 clearly would be ruled out in Fig. 3 for a reasonable extrapolation of the measured correlation function. Thus, to make a large contribution to the EBL, the correlation constraint requires that this additional population and the detected galaxies form an extremely bimodal distribution in surface brightness. The undetected sources must have very low central surface brightness and be confusion-limited on the sky. Some galaxies certainly lie within the region between the FOCAS detections and the "allowed" region for extra sources of the EBL. As shown in Section 1, extrapolation of the number counts would place some objects here but they would not contribute very much surface brightness to the EBL. Extrapolation of the detected galaxy counts adds little to the EBL, but would these -- 15 -- fainter galaxies cause detectable correlations? No. Following equation (9), a population of galaxies fainter than mlim with number per magnitude distribution N(m) = dn/dm and identical angular scale size h has zero-lag autocorrelation signal Cpop(0) = 1 8πh2 Z ∞ mlim dm N(m)h10−0.8(m+48.60)i (erg/s/cm2/sr/Hz)2. (13) If we extrapolate the HDF V-band counts from V = 29.5mag to zero flux with logarithmic count slope α = 0.2 and scale size h = 0.2′′, then C(0)pop = 2.2 × 10−43(erg/s/cm2/sr/Hz)2, which translates to a dimensionless correlation ωpop(0) = Cpop(0)/µ2 = 2.2 × 10−7. Comparison to Figure 2 shows that this signal is two orders of magnitude below the measured correlations. Thus, although galaxies brighter than the HDF detection limit would dominate the clustering signal (see section 2), galaxies just fainter than this limit have little effect on the observed correlations. 4.2. Weakly Clustered Diffuse Light So far, we have ignored clustering among the undetected objects. If the undetected sources are clustered, then the solid line in Figure 3 moves down towards even lower allowed central surface brightness. In the limit of point-like objects, the autocorrelation function of a population (eq.[5]) reduces to Cpop(θ) = nf 2δ(θ) + n2f 2ωclust(θ). (14) This must be convolved with the PSF to determine the observed autocorrelation. If we set nf = Eµdetect then we obtain a simple constraint on the 1′′ angular clustering amplitude of the sources, ωclust(1′′) < Cobs(1′′) (Eµdetect)2 . (15) This constraint applies for all scales if we make the additional assumption that these objects have power law angular correlations, ωpop(θ) ∝ θγ with γ ∼ −0.6, similar to that fit to the HDF sky correlations. On scales larger than the PSF size, the inequality in equation (15) is equivalent to a constraint on a clustered diffuse EBL component with µdif f use = Eµdetect. Figure 4 shows the constraints on combinations of µdif f use and ωdif f use(1′′) from the HDF correlations. For E = 1, the upper bound on angular clustering of diffuse light is ωdif f use(1′′) < 8 × 10−3. This 1′′ clustering amplitude is an order of magnitude smaller than the clustering measured for galaxies as faint as I < 29 in the HDF (Colley et al. 1996; Villumsen et al. 1997). Thus, to contribute as much surface brightness as the detected galaxies, these undetected objects -- 16 -- must be not only extremely faint and numerous, but also uniformly distributed to exquisite precision. Apart from imagined sources of additional EBL, several observations of galaxy clusters detect diffuse light or intergalactic stars that would contribute to the amplitude and clustering of the EBL if similar surface brightness is associated with most galaxies. From R band imaging of Abell 2029, Uson, Boughn, & Kuhn (1991) infer that 10% of the light in this cluster is in a diffuse component. Using WFPC2 imaging of the Virgo cluster, Ferguson, Tanvir, & Von Hippel (1996) find a population of intergalactic stars that could contribute total flux equal to 10% of that in galaxies. Theuns & Warren (1996) detect candidate planetary nebulae in Fornax and infer an intergalactic stellar population that contributes as much as 40% of the cluster light. M´endez et al. (1997) also find candidates for intergalactic planetary nebulae in Virgo. Tyson, Kochanski, & Dell'Antonio (1997) detect diffuse light in CL0024+1654 that comprises 15% of the light in the central 100kpc of this cluster. If diffuse intergalactic light makes a fractional contribution to the EBL (relative to µdetect from galaxy counts) that is similar to the intergalactic surface brightness detected in clusters, then it could cause EBL fluctuations close to those measured in the HDF sky. The constraints on diffuse intergalactic light also follow from equation (15) if the diffuse light is clustered in similar fashion to faint galaxies, with a power law correlation function Cdif f (θ) ∼ µ2 dif f θ−0.6. Let us suppose that the clustering amplitude of the diffuse light is comparable to that of faint galaxies. The small arrow in Figure 4 indicates the level of diffuse light that contributes an additional µdif f use = 0.1µdetect (i.e., similar to the 10% contribution of intergalactic stars in Virgo). The EBL correlations from this source would match the HDF correlations if this light has the same clustering amplitude as R < 23mag galaxies, ω(1′′) ∼ 1 (Couch, Jurcevic, & Boyle 1993). Because 75% of the light from detected galaxies comes from I814 < 23 galaxies, it seems plausible that much of the diffuse light would be associated with galaxies in this same magnitude interval, and be gravitationally clustered with similar amplitude. Note that the contribution of any such a source to the EBL fluctuations would leave even less room in the upper limits on sky correlations for a discrete source population. 4.3. Is the HDF Typical? A remaining question is whether the HDF is a typical field for the purpose of probing fluctuations in the EBL. The answer depends on the redshift and angular size of the hypothesized sources of undetected EBL. The 80′′ × 80′′ field of view of each WF camera limits the utility of the HDF for studying fluctuations on scales much larger than 10′′. -- 17 -- This angular coverage also limits the range of apparent magnitude of the galaxies that the field includes. Because this observation was designed to be an unbiased probe of the high-redshift universe, the field was deliberately chosen to avoid bright foreground galaxies (V < 22mag) which would fill much of the WFPC2 field of view. This avoidance of bright galaxies raises the concern that the HDF is biased against detection of EBL fluctuations from previously undetected sources at redshift z ∼< 0.3 that are clustered with bright galaxies. [A similar bias arises in the direct EBL detection method of Bernstein et al., because they use WFPC2 imaging to measure the total sky brightness.] However, it seems extremely contrived to envisage a population of sources that is not detected at z > 0.3 through fluctuation analysis, is not directly detected at z < 0.3 in deep ground-based imaging, and yet contributes a large fraction of the optical background. Another issue is variation of EBL fluctuations from field to field. The total imaged area of the three WF cameras is 5.3 arcmin2, of which we analyze only the central 1.3 arcmin2. If additional sources of EBL are distributed similarly to the detected galaxies, then expected fluctuations in galaxy counts provides a rough estimate of uncertainty in the mean EBL over this area. The Poisson fluctuation in counts of galaxies with magnitude 26 < V < 29.5 would be 5% over a 1.3 arcmin2 area. For the magnitude range 23 < V < 26, the expected fluctuation rises to 12%. Galaxy clustering does not significantly increase this lower bound on the field-to-field fluctuations; although the field of view spans only a few hundred kpc in angle, these magnitude intervals include galaxies over many hundreds of comoving Mpc in distance. We conclude that the field-to-field variation in the amplitude of the HDF correlations is likely to be caused by systematic effects rather than true fluctuations in the EBL. 5. CONCLUSIONS Fluctuations in the object-masked sky in the HDF provide a strong, albeit indirect, constraint on the mean optical EBL. If the HDF provides a fair probe of the extragalactic sky between detected galaxies, then we conclude that this observation and other deep imaging surveys have already detected the sources of the majority of the optical EBL. The mean optical EBL is, at most, a few tens of percent above the mean surface brightness from detected galaxies. At λ = 8100A, a generous allowance for up to 50% additional EBL suggests 7.8 × 10−6 ≤ νIν < 1.2 × 10−5erg/s/cm2/sr. This mean level lies at the lower end of the uncertainty range of the measurement by Bernstein et al. (νIν = 2.1 ± 1.2 × 10−5erg/s/cm2/sr, after including V < 23mag galaxies) and well below previous upper limits. -- 18 -- We infer this mean EBL level because no plausible sources of additional extragalactic surface brightness can satisfy the multiple constraints that these sources (1) have not already been detected, (2) contribute total surface brightness comparable to the surface brightness contributed by detected galaxies, and (3) do not produce EBL fluctuations larger than the upper limits set by correlations in the object-masked HDF. Figure 3 shows that these constraints admit only extremely low surface brightness objects that must be so extended and numerous as to be confusion-limited on the sky. The parameters of simple phenomenological models that meet these constraints would make such a population disjoint from the parameter space of all detected objects. Extrapolation of the HDF galaxy number counts to infinitely faint limits would add at most a few percent to the mean EBL. Figure 4 shows that a diffuse component that is as large as the surface brightness from detected galaxies would require a V -band angular clustering amplitude of ω(1′′) < 8 × 10−3, an order of magnitude less clustered than the faintest observed galaxies. Fluctuations in the EBL from intergalactic stars as seen in galaxy clusters could be as large as the upper limits on the fluctuations in the HDF, but would contribute only incrementally to the mean EBL. In addition to constraining the plausible level of the optical EBL, these upper limits on small-scale sky fluctuations in the HDF provide a test for any proposed model for faint galaxy populations. We plan to test galaxy population models that are more detailed than the simple phenomenological model described in Section 4 (Paper III). We invite others to suggest possible models, compute the predicted autocorrelation function of sources below the detection limits, and compare with these limits from the HDF. These correlations are also important for attempts to detect weak lensing signals in deep optical imaging (Van Waerbeke et al. 1997; Refregier et al. 1997). As we emphasize throughout this paper, the measured correlations of the object-masked sky in the HDF should be treated as upper limits on the true EBL fluctuations. The wings of the WFPC2 point spread function almost certainly contribute to the measured fluctuations. Although there are reasons to exclude flat fielding errors or Galactic light as the principal sources of the fluctuations, we cannot rule out some contribution from these effects. To improve these upper limits, we are examining these systematics and foregrounds in further detail (Paper II). The HDF provides the best constraint to date on small-scale EBL fluctuations because its superior resolution allows detection of faint galaxy populations that would be confusion-limited in ground-based imaging. In section 2, we discuss how fluctuation analysis of shallower HST or ground-based images would be dominated on small scales by the profiles of galaxies that only the HDF detects. However, ground-based imaging is required to study fluctuations on angular scales much larger than several arcseconds, where access -- 19 -- to larger collecting area and accurate control of systematics outweigh the HST's advantages of high resolution and lower sky background. If we measure object-masked sky correlations in deep ground-based images, we can now use the HDF galaxy counts and profiles to model and subtract the surface brightness correlations that are caused by galaxies that are fainter than the ground-based detection limits, but that were detected by the HDF. Fluctuation analysis of deep ground-based imaging will allow statistical tests for diffuse intergalactic light on larger angular scales and for low surface brightness companions to galaxies that were too bright to be included in the HDF (see section 4c). Future HST observations will allow measurement of EBL fluctuations in independent fields and at fainter surface brightness levels than the HDF. The planned HDF South (October 1998) will reach to similar depth and allow us to test if the HDF North is typical. The Advanced Camera for Surveys (scheduled for installation on HST in 1999) will have superior sensitivity and better-controlled systematic uncertainties than WFPC2, as well as a 200′′ × 200′′ contiguous field of view, thus allowing measurement of surface brightness fluctuations at fainter levels and somewhat larger scales. The proposed GTO program for ACS focuses on deep imaging of galaxy clusters. Fluctuation analysis of the ACS cluster fields will be an important test for sources of diffuse intergalactic surface brightness. In the 2 − 10µm infrared, the proposed Next Generation Space Telescope might detect statistical fluctuations in the EBL from the first generation of stars (e.g., Haiman & Loeb 1997) even if such objects evade direct detection. We thank R. Williams and the entire HDF team, whose vision and effort made this project possible. We acknowledge discussions with and many helpful comments from A. Babul, R. Bernstein, S. Casertano, A. Connolly, H. Ferguson, A. Fruchter, M. Geller, E. Groth, R. Lupton, P. Madau, J. Peebles, A. Refregier, P. Stockman, M. Strauss, A. Szalay, T. Tyson, and D. Wilkinson. We also thank R. Bernstein and L. Pozzetti for providing results in advance of publication. This paper was initiated during a visit to the Aspen Center for Physics. Support for this work was provided by NASA through grants HF-01078.01-94A and AR-05812.01-94A from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc. under NASA contract NAS5-26555, REFERENCES Barcons, X., & Fabian, A. C. 1989, MNRAS, 237, 119 Bernstein, R. A. 1997, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology Bernstein, R. A., Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. 1998, in preparation -- 20 -- Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&A Suppl., 117, 393 Bothun, G. D., Impey, C. D., Malin, D. F., & Mould, J. R. 1987, AJ, 94, 23 Boughn, S. P., & Kuhn, J. R. 1986, ApJ, 309, 33 Boughn, S. P., Saulson, P. R., & Uson, J. M. 1986, ApJ, 301, 17 Burrows, C. J., et al. 1995, Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 Instrument Handbook, STScI publication Cole, S., Treyer, M., & Silk, J. 1992, ApJ, 385, 9 Colley, W. N., Rhoads, J. E., Ostriker, J. P., & Spergel, D. N. 1996, ApJ, 43, 63 Condon, J. J. 1974, ApJ, 188, 279 Connolly, A. J., Szalay, A. S., Dickinson, M., Subbarao, M. U., & Brunner, R. J. 1997, ApJ, 486, L11 Couch, W. J., Jurcevic, J. S., & Boyle, B. J. 1993, MNRAS, 260, 241 Dalcanton, J. J. 1997, ApJ, in press Dermott, S. F., Jayaraman, S., Xu, Y. L., Grogan, K., & Gustafson, A. S. 1996, in Unveiling the Cosmic Infrared Background, ed. E. Dwek, AIP Conf. Proc. 348, 25 Disney, M. J. 1976, Nature, 263, 573 Djorgovski, S., Soifer, B. T., Pahre, M. A., Larkin, J. E., Smith, J. D., Neugebauer, G., Smail, I. Matthews, K., Hogg, D. W., Blandford, R. D., Cohen, J., Harrison, W., & Nelson, J. 1995, ApJ, 438, L13 Dube, R. R., Wickes, W. C., & Wilkinson, D. T. 1977, ApJ, 215, L51 Dube, R. R., Wickes, W. C., & Wilkinson, D. T. 1979, ApJ, 232, 333 Fall, S. M., Charlot, S. & Pei, Y. C. 1996, ApJ, 464, L1 Ferguson, H., Tanvir, N. & Von Hippel, T. 1996, BAAS, 189, 80.06 Fomalont, E. B., Kellerman, K. I., Anderson, M. C., Weistrop, D., Wall, J. V., Windhorst, R. A., & Kristian, J. A. 1988, AJ, 96, 1187 Fruchter, A. S., & Hook, R. N. 1997, in Applications of Digital Image Processing XX, ed. A. Tescher, Proc. S.P.I.E. vol 3164, in press (preprint astro-ph/9708242) Guhathakurta, P., & Tyson, J. A. 1989, ApJ, 346, 773 Gunn, J. E. 1965, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology Haiman, Z., & Loeb, A. 1997, ApJ, 483, 21 -- 21 -- Hasinger, G., Burg, R., Giacconi, R., Hartner, G., Schmidt, M., Truemper, J., & Zamorani, G. 1993, A&A, 275, 1; erratum: 291, 348 Hauser, M. G. 1996, in Unveiling the Cosmic Infrared Background, ed. E. Dwek, AIP Conf. Proc. 348, 11 Hewish, A. 1961, MNRAS, 123, 167 Kashlinsky, A., Mather, J. C., & Odenwald, S. 1997, ApJ, 473, L9 Krist, J. E. 1995, in Calibrating the Hubble Space Telescope: Post Servicing Mission, eds. A. Koratkar & C. Leitherer, 311 Krist, J. E., & Burrows, C. J. 1994, WFPC2 Instrument Science Report 94-01, STScI Lillie, C. F. 1968, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin Madau, P., Ferguson, H. C., Dickinson, M. E., Giavalisco, M., Steidel, C. C., & Fruchter, A. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 1388 Madau, P., Pozzetti, L., & Dickinson, M. 1997, ApJ, submitted (preprint astro-ph/9708218) Martin, C., & Bowyer, S. 1989, ApJ, 338, 677 Mattila, K. 1990, in The Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation, Proc. IAU Symp. 139, eds. S. Bowyer & C. Leinert (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 257 McGaugh, S. S., Bothun, G. D., & Schombert, J. M. 1995, AJ, 110, 573 M´endez, R. H., Guerrero, M. A., Freeman, K. C., Arnaboldi, M., Kudritzki, R. P., Hopp, U., Capaccioli, M., & Ford, H. 1997, ApJ, in press (preprint astro-ph/9710179) Milliard, B., Donas, J., Laget, M., Armand, C., & Vuillemin, A. 1992, A&A, 257, 24 Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713 Paresce, F. 1990, in The Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation, Proc. IAU Symp. 139, eds. S. Bowyer & C. Leinert (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 307 Partridge, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. 1967a, ApJ, 147, 868 Partridge, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. 1967b, ApJ, 148, 377 Persic, M., de Zotti, G., Boldt, E. A., Marshall, F. E., Danese, L., Francheschini, A., & Palumbo, G. G. C. 1989, ApJ, 336, L47 Pozzetti, L., Madau, P., Zamorani, G., Ferguson, H. C., & Bruzual, G. A. 1997, MNRAS, submitted Reach, W. T., Franz, B. A., Kelsall, T., & Weiland, J. L. 1996, in Unveiling the Cosmic Infrared Background, ed. E. Dwek, AIP Conf. Proc. 348, 37 Refregier, A., et al. 1997, in preparation -- 22 -- Roach, F. E., & Smith, L. L. 1968, Geophys. J., 15, 227 Scheuer, P. A. G. 1957, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 53, 764 Shectman, S. A. 1973, ApJ, 179, 681 Shectman, S. A. 1974, ApJ, 188, 233 Spinrad, H., & Stone, R. P. S. 1978, ApJ, 226, 609 Toller, G. N. 1983, ApJ, 266, L79 Theuns, T. & Warren, S. J. 1996, MNRAS, 284, 11 Tyson, J. A. 1988, AJ, 96, 1 Tyson, J. A. 1995, in Extragalactic Background Radiation, eds. D. Calzetti, M. Livio, & P. Madau (Cambridge University Press), 103 Tyson, J. A., Kochanski, & Dell'Antonio, I. 1997, ApJ, submitted Uson, J. M., Boughn, S. P., & Kuhn, J. R. 1991, ApJ, 369, 46 Van Waerbeke, L., Mellier, Y., Schneider, P., Fort, B., & Mathez, G. 1997, A&A, 317, 303 Vaisanen, P. 1996, A&A, 315, 21 Villumsen, J. V., Freudling, W., & da Costa, L. N. 1997, ApJ, 481, 578 Vogeley, M. S. 1998, in preparation (Papers II, III) Whitrow, G. J., & Yallop, B. D. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 31 Williams, R. E., Blacker, B., Dickinson, M., Dixon, W. V. D., Ferguson, H. C., Fruchter, A. S., Giavalisco, M., Gilliland, R. L., Heyer, I., Katsanis, R., Levay, Z., Lucas, R. A., McElroy, D. B., Petro, L., Postman, M., Adorf, H. M., & Hook, R. N. 1996, AJ, 112, 1335 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. -- 23 -- Table 1: Autocorrelation and Cross Correlation Power Law Fits a Filter B450 V606 I814 B450 × V606 V606 × I814 ω(1′′) γ 3.58 (±0.69) × 10−6 −0.80 (±0.16) 1.99 (±0.38) × 10−6 −0.61 (±0.14) 2.99 (±0.59) × 10−6 −0.59 (±0.13) 1.96 (±0.39) × 10−6 −0.62 (±0.15) 2.14 (±0.46) × 10−6 −0.53 (±0.14) µ b 6.62 × 10−19 1.00 × 10−18 1.39 × 10−18 ... ... ∆ c 4.14 × 10−7 3.67 × 10−7 5.84 × 10−7 3.53 × 10−7 4.90 × 10−7 aThe observed correlation function over 0.15′′ < θ < 8′′ is fit by C(θ) = µ2ω(1′′)(θ/1′′)γ. bMean of object-masked sky in erg/s/cm2/sr/Hz. Note that 10−18 erg/s/cm2/sr/Hz = 22.94 AB mag/arcsec2. cIntegral constraint bias for a 41′′ × 41′′ field, estimated using these fits (See eq.[3]). -- 24 -- 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 Fig. 1. -- Observational constraints on the mean EBL. Inset box replots the dotted region (optical limits only) using linear axes. Solid symbols are lower limits from the average surface brightness contributed by galaxies detected in deep imaging surveys: the HDF, other optical surveys, and K-band (solid circles; Pozzetti et al. 1997), UV (square; Milliard et al. 1992). Arrows indicate upper limits on the extragalactic contribution to the night sky brightness in the UV from Paresce (1990), in the optical from Toller (1983) and Dube et al. (1977, 1979), and in the IR from Hauser (1996) (left to right, respectively). Open circles indicate a detection of the mean EBL (Bernstein 1997) with 1σ uncertainties. The detection level includes a small adjustment for flux from bright galaxies (V < 23mag) that were excluded from this measurement. The surface brightness in AB magnitudes that corresponds to νIν = 10−5 erg/s/cm2/sr at λ = 5500A is 27.3 mag/arcsec2. -- 25 -- Fig. 2. -- Autocorrelations of "sky" pixels in the central 41′′ × 41′′ of the HDF images in the B450, V606, and I814 bandpasses, and cross correlations of B450 × V606 and V606 × I814. These curves are averages over the WF2, 3, and 4 fields. Error bars on the V606 curve are from the variance among the fields (which dominates this uncertainty) and within bins of width δ(log10 θ) = 0.4. Other curves have similar uncertainty. Shot noise dominates the autocorrelations for θ < 0.1′′. Both auto and cross correlations are well-fitted by power laws from 0.15′′ to 8′′ (see Table 1 for fitting parameters). The drop-off at large θ is an artifact of the integral constraint bias on the correlation function for a finite area of sky. The heavy solid bar at 4 × 10−7 marks the typical amount by which we underestimate the correlations due to this effect. Cross correlation removes the shot noise and confirms that roughly the same fluctuations are seen in different filters. Several sources of instrumental systematics and astronomical foregrounds may contribute to this measured correlation signal. Thus, we treat this measurement as an upper limit on small-scale fluctuations in the EBL. -- 26 -- Fig. 3. -- Correlation constraints on a population of identical exponential disks, assuming no clustering among the objects. Using the power-law correlation signal in Figure 2 as an upper limit on the true fluctuations, here we explore the allowed range of h and µ0 in the V606 band. The surface density of objects is set so that the EBL contributed by these sources is equal to that in detected galaxies. A population with central surface brightness µ0 and scale size h that lies above the solid line would produce correlations larger than observed. Below this line, the correlation constraint is satisfied, but the covering factor on the sky (right-hand axis) is quite large; any population with µ0 > 29.5mag/arcsec2 would completely cover the sky > 3 times. Indicated are the total magnitudes and surface density of two marginally- allowed populations. The region above the dashed line is the locus of galaxies detected to the limits of the HDF. Some galaxies may exist between the dashed box and solid line without causing excessive EBL correlations; they simply cannot contribute very much total surface brightness to the EBL. -- 27 -- Fig. 4. -- Constraints on clustered diffuse light with mean surface brightness µ and 1′′ clustering amplitude ω(1′′), assuming that the angular correlation function of the diffuse light has the same slope as the measured ω(θ). The allowed region in the µ−ω(1′′) plane lies below the solid line. To contribute surface brightness equal to that in detected galaxies (dashed line), the diffuse light would have to be nearly uniform. A small fractional contribution to the EBL, similar to the fraction of diffuse light in clusters, might be allowed if this light has angular clustering similar to faint galaxies (note arrows at bottom of this figure). The observed correlations marginally allow diffuse light with surface brightness that is ∼ 10% that of detected galaxies if the correlation amplitude is similar to R < 23mag galaxies. Note that 75% of the resolved EBL comes from galaxies with I ∼< 23mag. Such an EBL component would account for the observed fluctuations but would add only incrementally to the total mean EBL.
0803.0078	1	0803	2008-03-01T19:23:07	Cluster Multi-spacecraft Determination of AKR Angular Beaming	[ "astro-ph" ]	Simultaneous observations of AKR emission using the four-spacecraft Cluster array were used to make the first direct measurements of the angular beaming patterns of individual bursts. By comparing the spacecraft locations and AKR burst locations, the angular beaming pattern was found to be narrowly confined to a plane containing the magnetic field vector at the source and tangent to a circle of constant latitude. Most rays paths are confined within 15 deg of this tangent plane, consistent with numerical simulations of AKR k-vector orientation at maximum growth rate. The emission is also strongly directed upward in the tangent plane, which we interpret as refraction of the rays as they leave the auroral cavity. The narrow beaming pattern implies that an observer located above the polar cap can detect AKR emission only from a small fraction of the auroral oval at a given location. This has important consequences for interpreting AKR visibility at a given location. It also helps re-interpret previously published Cluster VLBI studies of AKR source locations, which are now seen to be only a subset of all possible source locations. These observations are inconsistent with either filled or hollow cone beaming models.	astro-ph	astro-ph	GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. ???, XXXX, DOI:10.1029/, Cluster Multi-spacecraft Determination of AKR Angular Beaming R. L. Mutel1 I. W. Christopher1 J .S. Pickett1 Abstract. Simultaneous observations of AKR emission using the four-spacecraft Cluster array were used to make the first direct measurements of the angular beaming pat- terns of individual bursts. By comparing the spacecraft loca- tions and AKR burst locations, the angular beaming pattern was found to be narrowly confined to a plane containing the magnetic field vector at the source and tangent to a circle of constant latitude. Most rays paths are confined within 15◦ of this tangent plane, consistent with numerical simula- tions of AKR k-vector orientation at maximum growth rate. The emission is also strongly directed upward in the tan- gent plane, which we interpret as refraction of the rays as they leave the auroral cavity. The narrow beaming pattern implies that an observer located above the polar cap can de- tect AKR emission only from a small fraction of the auroral oval at a given location. This has important consequences for interpreting AKR visibility at a given location. It also helps re-interpret previously published Cluster VLBI stud- ies of AKR source locations, which are now seen to be only a subset of all possible source locations. These observations are inconsistent with either filled or hollow cone beaming models. 1. Introduction Determining the angular beaming characteristics of ter- restrial auroral kilometric radiation (AKR) has been an im- portant focus of AKR investigations since its discovery more than forty years ago. Gurnett [1974] made the first analysis of AKR beaming using one year of Imp-6 and Imp-8 satellite observations of AKR emission. He found that the statisti- cal power pattern formed a 'distinct cone-shaped bound- ary' at a large angle to the magnetic field direction. Sub- sequent statistical analyses of AKR radiation patterns were fitted to either frequency-dependent filled cone [Green et al., 1977; Green and Gallagher , 1985] or hollow cone [Calvert, 1981b, 1987] beaming models, the latter suggested by stud- ies of Jovian decametric emission [e.g., Dulk , 1970], whose properties are consistent with a very thin (∼ 1◦ ) hollow cone. More recently, Kasaba et al. [1997] analyzed 38 months of AKR bursts recorded on the GEOTAIL spacecraft. They could not distinguish between hollow and filled cone models, but found that the AKR illumination pattern was systemat- ically modified both by geomagnetic activity and by season. These studies provide statistical descriptions of the over- all sky pattern illuminated by AKR bursts, but they do not address the angular beaming pattern of individual 1Dept. Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City IA 52242, USA. Copyright 2018 by the American Geophysical Union. 0094-8276/18/$5.00 1 AKR bursts. AKR emission is thought to consist of a large number of 'elementary radiation sources' with nar- row frequency-time structures [Gurnett and Anderson, 1981; Pottelette et al., 2001; Mutel et al., 2006]. Hence, in- struments with inadequate frequency and/or time resolu- tion (e.g. swept-frequency receivers) receive the sum of contributions from many spatially separated elementary sources whose frequency-time structures lie within the time- frequency resolution window of the instrument. Also, since most beaming studies have utilized observations from sin- gle satellites, the observed power pattern on the sky is a statistical ensemble of beams from many individual radiat- ing sources rather than the angular beaming pattern of an isolated source. The wideband (WBD) instrument on the four Cluster spacecraft provides a unique opportunity to determine the angular power pattern of individual AKR bursts for the first time. The WBD system records the received waveform di- rectly, so that it has adequate time and frequency resolu- tion to isolate emission from individual elementary AKR sources. In addition, since the Cluster constellation forms a 2-dimensional array on the sky, it can simultaneously sample the burst over a range of solid angles. Finally, by measur- ing the differential delays between pairs of spacecraft, the locations of individual AKR bursts can also be determined [Mutel et al., 2003]. This provides a spatial filter which iso- lates radiation from a single region and allow the array to sample individual burst power patterns. 2. AKR Beaming: Model predictions The electron cyclotron maser instability (CMI) is widely believed to be the mechanism responsible for auroral kilo- metric radio emission [e.g., Treumann, 2006]. AKR sources are found in thin, low density cavities in the upward current region above the auroral zones [Calvert, 1981a; Ergun et al., 1998] . The cavities are generally oriented tangent to the auroral oval and aligned with the magnetic field. They have small latitudinal widths (10 km -100 km) compared with their longitudinal extent, which can extend several thousand km. The radiation is generated most efficiently in the internal extraordinary (X) mode close to the electron gyro-frequency. The growth rate is strongly peaked for propagation nearly perpendicular to the magnetic field, as seen in both in situ observations [Roux et al., 1993; Ergun et al., 1998] and in model calculations [Pritchett et al., 2002; Mutel et al., 2007] . The internal X-mode cannot propagate directly, but can be converted to external right circularly polarized X-mode radi- ation after upward propagation along the tangent plane, as first noted by Louarn and Le Qu´eau [1996]. Pritchett et al. [2002], using a 2-dimensional simulation of AKR emission in a thin cavity, also found that the emission is highly beamed in the 'along track' or longitudinal direction. This prediction is strengthened by FAST in situ observations in the upward current region which found that the tangential power is 100 times stronger than the perpendicular spectrum [Pritchett et al., 2002]. X - 2 MUTEL ET AL.: ANGULAR BEAMING OF AKR Figure 1. (a) Geometry of the tangent plane beaming model. The tangent plane cavity, shown in blue, is tan- gent to a circle of constant latitude at the source. The green lines are escaping ray paths, the black line is the magnetic field, and yellow arrows are the xyz coordinates system described in the text. (b) Refraction angle ver- sus horizontal distance for rays at 125 kHz (red), 250 kHz (green), and 500 (blue) kHz initially perpendicular to the magnetic field. Ray paths are shown in the lower right inset. 3. Geometry of beamed AKR emission We used the wideband plasma wave instrument (WBD) [Gurnett et al., 2001] on the four Cluster spacecraft in VLBI mode to determine the locations of individual AKR bursts for more than 12,000 individual AKR bursts over 39 epochs. The VLBI technique solves for AKR burst locations using measurements of differential delays between all six pairs of spacecraft [Mutel et al., 2003]. The position uncertainty is typically 500-1000 km in the plane perpendicular to the source-observer line of sight. Once a source position is determined, we calculate the tangent plane coordinates of each spacecraft as seen from the source location. This is done by constructing an or- thonormal 3-dimensional coordinate system with origin at the source, (cid:126)x aligned outward along the magnetic field di- rection, (cid:126)z in the meridian plane pointed toward the local magnetic pole, and (cid:126)y = (cid:126)z × (cid:126)x. The tangent plane latitude is the angle between the spacecraft vector and the tangent (xy) plane, while the longitude is the angle between the spacecraft vector projected onto the the tangent plane and (cid:126)x. The coordinate geometry is illustrated in Fig. 1a. Figure 2. (a) Cluster spacecraft SC4 tangent plane lati- tude distribution at 125 kHz (red), 250 kHz (green), and 500 kHz (blue) determined from 12,000 AKR burst lo- cations. (b) Same as (a), but tangent plane co-longitude distribution. 3.1. Confinement to tangent plane Once a source location is determined, we calculate the tangent plane coordinates of the Cluster spacecraft at the time of reception of the individual burst. Histograms of the spacecraft tangent plane latitudes and longitudes for 12,000 individual AKR bursts are shown in Fig. 2. The latitude distribution is strongly peaked near 0◦ , with more than 98% of solutions within 20◦ of the origin, and appears to be frequency-independent. The longitude distribution has been folded about the origin, since the tangent plane model is symmetric to reflection about the (cid:126)x axis. The histogram for all three frequencies is peaked near the origin, indicating that the ray paths are strongly refracted. 3.2. Refractive effects As radiation leaves the auroral cavity, it is subject to re- fraction by the denser magnetospheric plasma. Detailed cal- culations of AKR propagation in the Earth's magnetosphere [Calvert, 1987; Gaelzer et al., 1994; Green, 1988; Schreiber et al., 2002; Burinskaya and Rauch, 2007; Xiao et al., 2007] predict upward refraction and/or reflection from the plasma- pause. Hence, the 'tangent plane' model suggests that AKR emission is confined to a plane containing the magnetic field vector at the source, and is refracted upward (Fig. 1b). In this paper we estimate the expected refraction outside the auroral cavity with a simple ray tracing calculation using the cold plasma dispersion equation. Rays at 125, 250, and 500 kHz are launched perpendicular to the magnetic field at magnetic latitude 70◦ from heights corresponding to the 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 200 400 600 800 1000Refraction angle (deg)Horizontal distance (perpendicular to field) [km] 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 200 400 600 800 1000Distance along field [km]Horizontal Distance (perpendicular to field) [km](b)(a)(a)(b) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4-80-60-40-20 0 20 40 60 80FractionTangent plane latitude 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90FractionTangent plane co-longitude (refraction angle)MUTEL ET AL.: ANGULAR BEAMING OF AKR X - 3 Figure 3. U pper panel : Locations of individual AKR bursts at 125 kHz (red), 250 kHz (green) and 500 kHz (blue) at epochs (a) 22 January 2003, (b) 23 Jul 2005, and (c) 28 July 2005. Mutual visibility maps for the Cluster array of spacecraft at each epoch are shown in yellow. Lower panel : Cluster spacecraft tangent plane coordinates as determined from each AKR burst location. 22 January 200300:52:30 to 02:35:2112:0018:0006:0000:0050.070.023 July 200502:21:18 to 02:59:5912:0018:0006:0000:00-50.0-70.028 July 200512:37:15 to 13:20:2812:0018:0006:0000:00-50.0-70.050-50100-100LatitudeLongitude125 kHz250 kHz500 kHz50-500028 July 200550-50100-100LatitudeLongitude125 kHz250 kHz500 kHz50-500023 July 200550-50100-100LatitudeLongitude125 kHz250 kHz500 kHz50-500022 January 2003(a)(b)(c)X - 4 MUTEL ET AL.: ANGULAR BEAMING OF AKR local electron gyro-frequency. We assume a dipole magnetic field, and an average electron density profile −3(cid:16) r (cid:17)−2 (1) ne(r) = 50 cm 2re where re is the radius of the Earth. Although the electron density varies significantly with both magnetic latitude and geomagnetic activity, this profile represents an approximate long-term average [cf. Laakso et al., 2002, Fig. 3a]. The resulting refraction angles versus coordinate position, along with the calculated ray paths, are shown in Fig. 1b. The ray tracing solution shows that the expected refraction is very strong, with average refraction angle between 70◦ and 80◦ , consistent with observed ray paths. More realistic magneto- spheric refraction models, including possible reflection from the plasmasphere, result in similar total refraction angles (e.g. Xiao et al. [2007]). 3.3. Visibility maps AKR emission that is beamed in a tangent plane and re- fracted upward will illuminate two symmetrically displaced azimuthal slices on a great circle belt that is the extension of the tangent plane on the sky. The belt will have a char- acteristic width given by the effective opening angle of the tangent plane and a longitudinal extent given by the (up- ward) refracted ray paths determined by the ambient mag- netospheric plasma outside the cavity. For a given spacecraft location, only a fraction of all source locations on the polar cap are able to illuminate the spacecraft. Hence, for a given tangent plane opening angle and refraction angle range, we can calculate the locus of all hypothetical AKR source loca- tions on the polar cap which can illuminate the spacecraft. We denote this locus of points as the visibility map for that spacecraft location. The upper panel of Fig. 3 shows VLBI maps of AKR source positions for three epochs (22 Jan 2003 at 00:52 - 02:35 UT, 23 July 2005 at 02:21-03:00 UT, and 28 July Figure 4. Comparison of visibility maps for tangent plane beaming model (0◦ - 45◦ longitude, 0◦±15◦ lati- tude, yellow) with 20◦ wide hollow cone models [open- ing angles 20◦ (red) and 40◦ (green)] for the 4-spacecraft Cluster array on Nov 10, 2005 at 11:30 UT. The locations of AKR burst source determined from differential delay solutions are shown as black x's (125 kHz), and squares (250 kHz). 2005 at 12:37-13:20 UT) mapped onto a CGM coordinate grid. Joint visibility maps of the Cluster array (i.e., the visibility area common to all four spacecraft) are shown in yellow. We computed the visibility maps assuming a tangent plane beaming pattern with a -15◦ to 15◦ latitudinal range and 0◦ to 45◦ longitude range. Note that for each epoch the AKR burst locations lie almost entirely within the visibility map. The lower panel shows the tangent plane coordinates of each spacecraft as viewed from each AKR source location. This figure provides clear confirmation that the spacecraft are located close to the tangent plane equator of each source as expected from the tangent plane beaming model. We can also see that the longitudinal positions are close to the source zenith, i.e., the ray paths suffer substantial refraction. 3.4. Comparison with hollow cone models Could the observations discussed in this paper also be compatible with hollow cone beaming models? In Fig. 4 we compare visibility maps calculated for a tangent plane beaming model (yellow) with hollow cone models having 20◦ opening angle (red) and 40◦ opening angle (green). The tan- gent plane model has a width of 30◦ while the hollow cone models have widths of 20◦. The visibility maps were com- puted for Cluster spacecraft positions on Nov 10, 2005 at 11:30 UT. The black x's (125 kHz)and squares (250 kHz) show AKR source locations determined by VLBI. It is clear that hollow cone models cannot fit the observed source lo- cations, while the tangent plane model provides an excellent fit. 4. Implications of Beaming Model the Tangent Plane The observations reported in this paper demonstrate that individual AKR bursts do not radiate in either filled or hol- low cones, as previously suggested, but rather are confined to a narrow plane tangent to the source's magnetic latitude circle and containing the local magnetic field vector. The rays are also directed upward, consistent with expected re- fraction as rays leave the auroral cavity. This geometry con- firms the numerical models of Louarn and Le Qu´eau [1996] and Pritchett et al. [2002] predicting longitudinal propaga- tion. It also implies that AKR observations from remote locations sample only a small part of the auroral oval from any given location. For example, the maps of AKR emission published by Mutel et al. [2003, 2004] likely represent only a small fraction of the total extent of AKR emission on the auroral oval. Acknowledgments. The University of Iowa acknowledges the support of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center under Grant NNX07AI24G. We are grateful to Roman Schreiber and Jan Hanasz for several fruitful discussions. References Burinskaya, T. M., and J. L. Rauch (2007), Waveguide regime of cyclotron maser instability in plasma regions of de- pressed density, Plasma Physics Reports, 33, 28–37, doi: 10.1134/S1063780X07010047. Calvert, W. (1981a), The stimulation of auroral kilometric radi- ation by type III solar radio bursts, Geophys. Res. Lett., , 8, 1091–1094. Calvert, W. (1981b), The AKR emission cone at low frequencies, Geophys. Res. Lett., , 8, 1159–1162. Calvert, W. (1987), A Jupiter Data Analysis Program (JDAP) research grant on wave accessibility and attributes, Tech. rep. Dulk, G. A. (1970), Characteristics of Jupiter's Decametric Radio Source Measured with Arc-Second Resolution, Astrophys. J., , 159, 671–+. MUTEL ET AL.: ANGULAR BEAMING OF AKR X - 5 Ergun, R. E., et al. (1998), FAST satellite wave observations in the AKR source region, Geophys. Res. Lett., , 25, 2061–2064, doi:10.1029/98GL00570. Gaelzer, R., F. L. Ziebell, and R. S. Schneider (1994), Ray tracing studies on auroral kilometric radiation in finite width auroral cavities, J. Geophys. Res., , 99, 8905–8916. Green, J. L. (1988), Ray tracing planetary radio emissions, in Planetary Radio Emissions II, edited by H. O. Rucker, S. J. Bauer, and B. M. Pedersen, pp. 355–379. Green, J. L., and D. L. Gallagher (1985), The detailed intensity distribution of the AKR emission cone, J. Geophys. Res., , 90, 9641–9649. Green, J. L., D. A. Gurnett, and S. D. Shawhan (1977), The an- gular distribution of auroral kilometric radiation., J. Geophys. Res., , 82, 1825–1838. Gurnett, D., and R. Anderson (1981), The kilometric radio emis- sion spectrum: Relatonship to auroral acceleration processes, Geophysicsal Monogrpah Series, 25, 341–350. Gurnett, D. A. (1974), The earth as a radio source: terrestrial kilometric radiation., J. Geophys. Res., , 79, 4227–4238. Gurnett, D. A., et al. (2001), First results from the Cluster wide- band plasma wave investigation, Annales Geophysicae, 19, 1259–1272. Kasaba, Y., H. Matsumoto, K. Hashimoto, and R. R. Anderson (1997), Angular distribution of auroral kilometric radiation ob- served by the GEOTAIL spacecraft, Geophys. Res. Lett., , 24, 2483–+. Laakso, H., R. Pfaff, and P. Janhunen (2002), Polar observations of electron density distribution in the Earth's magnetosphere. 1. Statistical results, Annales Geophysicae, 20, 1711–1724. Louarn, P., and D. Le Qu´eau (1996), Generation of the Auro- ral Kilometric Radiation in plasma cavities-II. The cyclotron maser instability in small size sources, Plan. Sp. Sci., 44, 211– 224. Mutel, R., D. Gurnett, and I. Christopher (2004), Spatial and temporal properties of AKR burst emission derived from Clus- ter WBD VLBI studies, Annales Geophysicae, 22, 2625–2632. Mutel, R. L., D. A. Gurnett, I. W. Christopher, J. S. Pickett, and M. Schlax (2003), Locations of auroral kilometric radi- ation bursts inferred from multispacecraft wideband Cluster VLBI observations. 1: Description of technique and initial re- sults, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 108, 8–1, doi:10.1029/2003JA010011. Mutel, R. L., J. D. Menietti, I. W. Christopher, D. A. Gurnett, and J. M. Cook (2006), Striated auroral kilometric radiation emission: A remote tracer of ion solitary structures, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 111, 10,203–+, doi: 10.1029/2006JA011660. Mutel, R. L., W. M. Peterson, T. R. Jaeger, and J. D. Scudder (2007), Dependence of cyclotron maser instability growth rates on electron velocity distributions and perturbation by solitary waves, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 112, 7211–+, doi:10.1029/2007JA012442. Pottelette, R., R. A. Treumann, and M. Berthomier (2001), Au- roral plasma turbulence and the cause of auroral kilometric radiation fine structure, J. Geophys. Res., , 106, 8465–8476, doi:10.1029/2000JA000098. Pritchett, P. L., R. J. Strangeway, R. E. Ergun, and C. W. Carlson (2002), Generation and propagation of cyclotron maser emis- sions in the finite auroral kilometric radiation source cavity, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 107, 13–1, doi:10.1029/2002JA009403. Roux, A., et al. (1993), Auroral kilometric radiation sources - In situ and remote observations from Viking, J. Geophys. Res., , 98, 11,657–+. Schreiber, R., O. Santolik, M. Parrot, F. Lefeuvre, J. Hanasz, M. Brittnacher, and G. Parks (2002), Auroral kilometric radi- ation source characteristics using ray tracing techniques, Jour- nal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 107, 20–1, doi: 10.1029/2001JA009061. Treumann, R. A. (2006), The electron cyclotron maser for as- trophysical application, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 13, 229–315, doi:10.1007/s00159-006-0001-y. Xiao, F., L. Chen, H. Zheng, and S. Wang (2007), A paramet- ric ray tracing study of superluminous auroral kilometric ra- diation wave modes, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 112, 10,214–+, doi:10.1029/2006JA012178. R. L. Mutel, Dept. Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City IA 52242 ([email protected]) I. W. Christopher, Dept. Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City IA 52242 ([email protected])
astro-ph/0109313	1	0109	2001-09-19T13:59:38	High-redshift QSOs in the FIRST survey	[ "astro-ph" ]	In a pilot search for high-redshift radio QSOs, we have obtained spectra of 55 FIRST sources (S(1.4GHz) > 1 mJy) with very red (O-E > 3) starlike optical identifications. 10 of the candidates are QSOs with redshifts 3.6 < z < 4.4 (4 previously known), six with z > 4. The remaining 45 candidates comprise: a z = 2.6 BAL QSO; 3 low-redshift galaxies with narrow emission lines; 18 probable radio galaxies; and 23 M stars (mainly misidentifications). The success rate (high-redshift QSOs / spectroscopically-observed candidates) for this search is 1/2 for S(1.4GHz) > 10 mJy, and 1/9 for S(1.4GHz) > 1 mJy. With an effective search area of 4030 deg^2, the surface density of high-redshift (z > 4) QSOs discovered with this technique is 0.0015 deg^-2.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 -- 000 (0000) Printed 25 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v1.4) High-redshift QSOs in the FIRST survey C.R. Benn,1 ⋆ M. Vigotti,2 M. Pedani,3 J. Holt,1,4 K.-H. Mack,6,2,7 R. Curran,1,5 S.F. S´anchez1 1Isaac Newton Group, Apartado 321, 38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain 2Istituto di Radioastronomia, CNR, via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy 3Centro Galileo Galilei, 38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain 4Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK 5Department of Physical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UK 6ASTRON/NFRA, Postbus 2, NL-7990 AA Dwingeloo, the Netherlands 7Radioastronomisches Institut der Universitat Bonn, Auf dem Hugel 71, D-53121 Bonn, Germany 25 October 2018 ABSTRACT In a pilot search for high-redshift radio QSOs, we have obtained spectra of 55 FIRST sources (S1.4GHz > 1 mJy) with very red (O-E > 3) starlike optical identifications. 10 of the candidates are QSOs with redshifts 3.6 < z < 4.4 (4 previously known), six with z > 4. The remaining 45 candidates comprise: a z = 2.6 BAL QSO; 3 low-redshift galaxies with narrow emission lines; 18 probable radio galaxies; and 23 M stars (mainly misidentifications). The success rate (high-redshift QSOs / spectroscopically-observed candidates) for this search is 1/2 for S1.4GHz > 10 mJy, and 1/9 for S1.4GHz > 1 mJy. With an effective search area of 4030 deg2, the surface density of high-redshift (z > 4) QSOs discovered with this technique is 0.0015 deg−2. Key words: quasars: general - quasars: emission lines - radio continuum: galaxies - early Universe 1 INTRODUCTION Observations of high-redshift (z > 4) QSOs strongly con- strain models of: the formation and evolution of galaxies and their central black holes (Kauffmann & Haehnelt 2000); the contribution of QSOs to the ionisation of the intergalac- tic medium at high redshifts (Steidel, Pettini, Adelberger 2001); and, through studies of the Lyman absorption forest, the chemical evolution of the intergalactic medium along the line of sight to the QSO (Rauch 1998, Hamann & Ferland 1999). Most of the ∼ 300 z > 4 QSOs now known have been discovered as a result of searches for objects with unusually red optical colours (Fig. 1). A summary of recent searches is given in Table 1. Kennefick et al (1995a, b) searched for ob- jects with unusually red g, r, i colours in 340 deg2 covered by the second Palomar Sky Survey (POSS-II) of the northern hemisphere and discovered 10 z > 4 QSOs (see also Djor- govski 2001). Similarly, Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) commissioning images have been searched for objects with red u, g, r, i, z colours. More than 100 z > 3.5 QSOs have been found so far (Fan et al 2000, 2001; Schneider et al 2001; Zheng et al 2001; Anderson et al 2001, Richards et al 2001), ⋆ Email: [email protected] c(cid:13) 0000 RAS and this number will rise rapidly as SDSS nears completion (∼ 10000 deg2) over the next few years. In the south, Storrie- Lombardi et al (2001) searched UKST plates scanned with the Automated Plate Measuring facility (APM) in Cam- bridge for objects with BJ − R > 2.5, and found 49 QSOs with z > 4. A disadvantage of the purely optical searches is that complex colour criteria are needed to exclude the much larger number of red stars, which makes it difficult to correct for incompleteness. Alternatively, simple one-colour criteria can be used, but then a large fraction of the high-redshift QSOs is missed (compare in Table 1 the surface densities at- tained for different types of optical selection). Starting with a sample of radio QSOs allows one to reduce the number of candidates without resorting to complex colour criteria, and is less likely to bias the selection against dusty objects. E.g. Hook et al (1998) sought red objects identified with flat-spectrum QSOs with S5GH z > 25 mJy over 1600 deg2, and found 6 with z > 3 (none with z > 4). Snellen et al (2001) sought red objects identified with flat-spectrum radio sources S5GH z > 30 mJy in the Cosmic Lens All-Sky Sur- vey (CLASS, Myers et al 2001) over 6400 deg2, and found 4 QSOs with z > 4, i.e. 1 z > 4 QSO per 1600 deg2. Higher surface densities can be attained by observing the counterparts of fainter radio sources. In this paper we 2 C.R. Benn et al Figure 1. The variation of POSSI O − E colour with redshift, for QSOs from the FIRST bright quasar survey (crosses, White et al 2000), the SDSS and POSSII searches for high-redshift QSOs (spots), and a selection of radio QSOs with 3.4 < z < 4.0 from the NASA Extragalactic Database (circles). The QSOs in these samples were selected in part on the basis of colour, but nev- ertheless trace the typical reddening of a QSO with increasing z (prediction for typical QSO shown as solid line) as the continuum redward of the Lyα line moves out of the observed O band (red limit ≈ 5000 A). As redshift increases above 4.5, the predicted brightness of a QSO in E band drops sharply, so few are likely to be detected. With the criteria O − E > 3, E < 18.6 used here, our QSO search is probably complete for z > 4, but incomplete for 3 < z < 4. report on a pilot search for high-redshift QSOs amongst very red, O − E > 3 (see Fig. 1), optical identifications of FIRST radio sources S1.4GH z > 1 mJy (with no selection on radio spectral index). There is no overlap between this search and the FIRST bright quasar survey (White et al 2000, Becker et al 2001), whose selection criterion O − E < 2 preclude detection of most high-redshift QSOs (none with z > 3.7 were cata- logued), as do the colour selection criteria of most large QSO surveys, e.g. the 2dF QSO survey (Croom et al 2001). 2 SAMPLE The FIRST radio catalogue (White et al 1997) currently in- cludes 722354 sources detected with peak S1.4GH Z > 1 mJy over 7988 deg2 (≈ 90 sources deg−2), mainly 7 < RA < 17h, -5 < Dec < 57o. We sought optical identifications of these sources with objects catalogued by the APM (Irwin et al 1994) on the POSS-I O (blue) and E (red) plates. We did not seek optical identifications at the mid-points of likely double radio sources (∼ 10% of the catalogue), since this would have required a substantial enlargement of the search area. The colour-magnitude distribution of the star-like opti- cal identifications lying within 1.5 arcsec of a FIRST source is shown in Fig. 2. We selected as candidate z > 4 QSOs Figure 2. Distribution in colour and magnitude of starlike (POSSI/APM) optical identifications of FIRST radio sources. Objects with no O magnitude have been plotted with O − E = 21.7 - E, and the E magnitudes have been randomised ± 0.1 so that the density of points in this region can be seen. Most of the objects in the lower part of the diagram are true QSOs. Most of those clustered at upper right are misclassified radio galaxies (the dashed line shows the expected colour-magnitude relationship for a redshifted giant elliptical galaxy), and many of the other red objects are misidentifications with galactic M stars. Some may also be BAL QSOs, which tend to be red. The candidate high- redshift QSOs observed here are drawn from the region enclosed by the dotted line. all starlike optical identifications with O − E > 3 (see Fig. 1) and E < 18.6 (the POSS blue limit is O ≈ 21.7). Trial spectroscopy showed that ∼ 80% of these are actually radio galaxies, which greatly outnumber QSOs at E ∼ 18, O−E ∼ 3 (Fig. 2). It was possible to filter out most of these by in- specting images from the digitised POSS-II survey, using the SExtractor program (Bertin & Arnouts 1996) to characterise the relationship between FWHM and intensity for stars (in each image), and thus to distinguish between stellar and ex- tended images. In addition, we filtered out the ≈ 25% of starlike images for which APM recorded no blue magnitude (i.e. implied magnitude fainter than the blue plate limit), but which were easily visible on the Minnesota APS scans of POSS-I (Pennington et al 1993); these images were missed by APM due to the coarser scanning resolution and greater susceptibility to confusion with nearby images. This selec- tion procedure yielded a total of 109 candidate high-redshift QSOs. 3 OBSERVATIONS AND REDUCTION Spectra were obtained of a random sample of 55 of the 109 candidates with the Isaac Newton Telescope's IDS spectro- graph on 2001 Mar 14, and with the Isaac Newton (IDS), William Herschel (ISIS) and Calar Alto 2.2-m (CAFOS) spectrographs on service nights between 2000 March 19 and c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Table 1. Recent searches for high-redshift QSOs Search programme (1) DPOSS-II SDSS APM/UKST INT wide-angle surv. CLASS flat-spectrum GB/FIRST flat-spec. " FIRST " Colour criterion (2) optical limit (3) r < 19.6 i < 20 gri ugriz BJ − R >2.5 R < 19.3 griz r < 24 Slim mJy (4) -- -- -- -- O − E > 2 O − E > 1.2 O − E > 1.2 O − E > 3 O − E > 3 E <19 E <19.5 E <19.5 E <18.6 E <18.6 S5 > 30 S5 >25 S5 >25 S1.4 >1 S1.4 >10 High-redshift QSOs in FIRST 3 Area Cands deg2 (5) (6) 340 180 8000 12.5 6400 1100 1100 4030 4030 85 27 50 50 55 9 z > N σ (7) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 (8) 10 18 49 3 4 0 6 6 4 deg−2 (9) 0.029 0.10 0.0061 0.24 0.00063 0.0 0.005 0.0015 0.0010 Hiz / cands (10) 0.11 Reference (11) Kennefick et al 1995a,b Fan et al 2001 Storrie-L. et al 2001 Sharp et al 2001 0.15 0.00 0.12 0.11 0.44 Snellen et al 2001 Hook et al 1998 " This paper " Column 4 gives, where appropriate, the radio flux-density limit Sν , for frequency ν in GHz. Column 9 gives the surface density of high-redshift QSOs discovered. Column 10 gives the ratio between the number of high-redshift QSOs found (column 8) and the number of candidates for spectroscopy (column 6). The images were debiased and flat-fielded, cosmic rays were eliminated, and the spectra were extracted, wavelength-calibrated and intensity-calibrated in the usual way, using the IRAF package. A summary of the observa- tions and results is given in Table 2. 4 RESULTS Spectra showing clear emission or absorption features were classified 'Q' (QSO, broad emission lines), 'S' (Sy2 or star- burst type spectrum, narrow emission lines) or '∗' (spectral features of M star). The remainder have been classified 'G' (probable radio galaxy, i.e. giant elliptical), where the char- acteristic 4000-A break is detected, otherwise '?'. Most of the '?' objects will be radio galaxies, rather than misiden- tifications with stars, judging from the number of M stars detected, the typical distribution of spectral types at this magnitude, and the magnitude distributions and the distri- butions on the sky of the '?' and '∗' objects. One of the '?' objects, 1036+42, has a flat SED inconsistent with it be- ing a radio galaxy; it may be a low-redshift QSO (z < 2.2). Of the other '?' objects, none has an SED consistent with it being a high-redshift QSO, except perhaps 1120+34 and 1349+38. The redshifts of the high-redshift QSOs were mea- sured from emission lines other than Lyα (because of the asymmetrical absorption), except in the case of 0839+51. The colour-magnitude diagram of the candidates is shown in Fig. 3. The spectra of the high-redshift QSOs are pre- sented in Figs. 4, 5. We find 10 high-redshift QSOs (z > 3.6) out of 55 candi- dates. These candidates were selected from 109 for the whole FIRST catalogue, covering 7988 deg2, so the effective area covered by this search is ∼ 4030 deg2, i.e. we find 0.0025 high-redshift QSOs deg−2 with z > 3.6, or 0.0015 deg−2 with z > 4.0. For S1.4GH z > 1 mJy, E < 18.6, the z > 4 search will be near-complete (Fig. 1). The surface density on the sky is compared with that from other searches for high-redshift QSOs in Table 1. The surface density of z > 4 radio QSOs discovered here is twice as high as that from the Snellen et al search, because of the lower flux-density limit. The efficiency of the search (number of high-redshift QSOs / number of candidates for spectroscopy) is 0.44 for S1.4GH z > 10 mJy, higher than for previous searches, probably because of the careful filtering of the candidates. Figure 3. Colour-magnitude distribution for the candidate high- redshift QSOs. The symbols for spectral type are as used in Ta- ble 2 (Q = QSO, S = narrow-emission-line galaxy, G = radio galaxy, ∗ = star, ? = probable radio galaxy). Large font indicates S1.4GH z > 10 mJy; small font S1.4GH z < 10 mJy. A nominal POSSI blue plate limit O = 21.7 is indicated by the dashed line. Objects with no O magnitude have been plotted with O − E = 21.7 - E, and the E magnitudes have been randomised ± 0.2 mag to reduce crowding. The arrows indicate upper or lower limits. 2001 Jan 5 (dates given in Table 2). Apart from 2000 Apr 5, May 12 and 2001 Jan 5, the nights were photometric. The INT IDS spectrograph was used with the R150V grating, yielding spectra with dispersion 6.5 A/pixel, usually cen- tred at 6500 A. The WHT ISIS dual-arm spectrograph was used with the R158R and R158B gratings in the red and blue arms respectively (with a dichroic separating the light blue and red of 6100 A). In the red arm, with a TEK CCD detector, this yielded spectra with dispersion 2.9 A, usually centred at 7400 A. In the blue arm, with an EEV CCD, the dispersion was 1.6 A/pixel, and the spectra were usually centred at 4800 A. The CAFOS spectrum has dispersion 8.5 A/pixel. c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 4 C.R. Benn et al Figure 4. Spectra of 8 of the 10 high-redshift QSOs (see Fig 5 for the remainder). Spectral features are labelled at wavelengths corresponding to the quoted redshift, assuming rest-frame wavelengths in A of 1216 (Lyα), 1240 (NV), 1302 (OI/SiII blend), 1400 (SiIV/OIV] blend), 1549 (CIV). For 0941+51, the metal-line absorption systems at z = 3.80, 3.83 are also indicated. The spectra have not been corrected for the terrestrial atmospheric absorption bands, notably at 7594 and 6867 A (A and B bands). c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Table 2. High-redshift QSO candidates RA J2000 (1) Dec J2000 (2) High-redshift QSOs: S1.4 mJy (3) R-O ′′ (4) E O − E Tel (5) (6) (7) Date obs. (8) 0.6 072518.29 0.8 074711.16 0.7 083141.68 0.8 083946.11 1.3 094119.36 0.5 105756.27 0.4 122027.93 1.1 130940.61 0.9 142308.19 0.9 151601.55 0.5 163950.51 Low-redshift QSOs and galaxies: 370517.9 273903.6 524517.1 511203.0 511932.3 455553.0 261903.6 573309.1 224157.5 430931.3 434003.3 26.6 1.5 0.9 41.6 2.7 1.4 35.0 11.5 35.4 1.5 23.8 091441.31 093255.83 101058.24 103549.91 103647.80 104622.91 104801.61 104958.45 105719.80 105750.00 111411.21 111557.91 111707.05 112028.10 115230.18 121532.16 124450.93 130604.97 134951.93 140816.68 143749.26 M stars: 072359.95 072801.49 074144.39 075127.64 084407.26 085700.54 090556.33 091953.76 100125.11 105102.41 111212.69 112518.16 113043.07 120849.72 132903.23 133833.44 135357.42 150859.95 150938.97 161150.75 163535.34 164217.03 164401.60 295621.4 353439.1 283247.0 300732.1 420852.7 345436.0 260032.3 411043.4 342807.0 353300.4 293244.4 352757.1 411736.1 345829.4 271808.4 250956.6 353906.7 352603.9 382334.9 352205.8 325917.8 523949.4 380344.2 333549.3 272736.4 280740.4 275540.0 224419.1 340906.7 370629.4 314914.5 431015.5 495158.8 514134.1 392907.1 323031.5 531642.1 343659.7 271431.0 434649.8 434412.4 352415.9 402230.8 420047.4 4.8 1.9 2.3 9.0 2.2 1.0 11.2 1.3 5.4 2.3 1.1 3.4 0.7 6.5 4.2 1.0 1.5 1.1 1.7 9.6 1.3 0.8 1.6 136.8 1.2 6.2 0.8 2.4 1.2 1.1 9.0 1.4 3.0 4.2 0.8 5.8 0.9 98.0 1.0 1.9 1.0 5.2 6.4 4.2 0.3 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.4 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.9 0.4 1.1 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 1.2 0.5 0.8 1.5 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.9 1.1 0.5 1.2 1.4 0.7 1.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.6 0.2 1.2 18.3 17.2 15.3 18.5 17.6 16.5 17.9 18.1 18.5 18.4 17.1 18.6 18.2 18.6 18.4 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.0 18.1 18.5 18.0 18.5 18.5 18.2 17.0 18.0 17.1 18.4 18.4 18.4 18.6 17.6 17.3 18.4 18.0 17.5 18.5 17.5 17.1 16.8 17.8 17.2 17.8 17.7 15.3 18.1 17.9 17.8 17.9 18.4 17.8 18.1 17.4 17.6 I I I I I >3.4 W 010105 010314 >4.5 010314 3.9 >3.2 010314 >4.1 W 000319 000405 010314 >3.6 W 000319 010314 >3.2 010314 >3.3 3.9 W 000718 3.9 3.3 I I >3.1 3.1 >3.1 3.3 >3.1 >3.1 3.0 3.2 >3.6 >3.2 3.8 >3.2 >3.2 >3.5 3.0 3.7 3.5 3.0 >3.3 >3.4 >3.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 010314 000405 010314 010314 010314 010314 I I >4.1 3.7 010314 010314 >3.3 W 010104 >3.7 W 010104 3.0 W 010105 >3.2 W 010105 >4.2 010314 I 010314 3.0 I 010314 3.2 I I >3.9 010314 C 000512 3.7 3.4 I 010314 010314 I 3.1 010314 I 3.2 010314 I 3.4 010314 I 3.3 3.9 I 010314 010314 I 3.4 010314 I >3.4 3.4 I 010314 3.4 W 000718 3.1 W 000718 3.5 W 000718 High-redshift QSOs in FIRST 5 ID z σz Notes (10) (11) (12) (13) Irwin et al (1998), z = 3.91 Snellen et al (2000), z = 4.41 Stern et al (2000), z = 4.12 Q 4.33 Q 4.17 Q 3.87 Q 4.42 Q 3.85 Q 4.11 Q 3.694 Q 4.274 Q 4.316 Q 2.590 Q 3.99 .01 .02 .03 .02 .01 .02 .005 .005 .005 .005 .015 0.587 .002 3727, 5007? blue SED 0.279 .001 3727 4861 4959 5007 6563 possible high-redshift QSO 0.282 .001 3727 4861 4959 5007 possible high-redshift QSO G ? ? S ? G ? ? G ? S ? G ? ? S ? ? ? G G * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * T sec (9) 900 200 200 300 1200 300 1200 300 1200 300 1000 300 300 100 300 200 300 300 300 300 1300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 400 400 1200 400 200 200 200 300 900 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 The columns give: (1-2) right ascension and declination, (3) FIRST 1.4-GHz (integrated, sometimes < peak) flux density, (4) radio - optical displacement, (5-6) APM POSSI E magnitude and O − E colour, (7) telescope with which spectrum obtained (W = William Herschel 4.2-m, I = Isaac Newton 2.5-m, C = Calar Alto 2.2-m), (8) date of observation, (9) exposure time, (10) spectral type (Section 4), (11-12) redshift and rms error on redshift. For low-redshift emission-line objects, the rest-frame wavelengths of detected lines are given in A in the last column: 3727 OII, 4861 Hβ, 4959/5007 OIII, 6563 Hα. For high-redshift QSOs, see Figs. 4, 5. c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 6 C.R. Benn et al Figure 5. Spectra of the two remaining high-redshift QSOs (see caption of Fig. 4); and of 4 other emission-line objects detected in this search (see text). 1516+43 was undetected on the POSS blue plate, but the field is optically confused and its true colour may be bluer than O − E = 3. Four of the 10 high-redshift QSOs were previ- ously known: 0747+27 (M. Irwin, private communication), 0831+52 (Irwin et al 1998), 0839+51 (Snellen et al 2001) and 1057+45 (Stern et al 2000). 0831+52 is unusually bright (E = 15) and the Lyα forest been studied in detail (Ellison et al 1999). 327-MHz flux densities are available for three of the high-redshift QSOs from the WENSS survey (Rengelink et al 1997). The 0.3 - 1.4-GHz spectral indices α (Sν ∝ ν α) are all flat: -0.1 for 0725+37, 0.0 for 0839+51, and -0.4 for 1639+43. The other 7 QSOs are too faint to be detected in WENSS, or lie below the WENSS declination limit. The SEDs of the high-redshift radio QSOs reported here are as varied as those found in optical searches. At least 0941+51 and 0831+52 show metal-line absorption redward of Lyα, probably associated with saturated Lyα lines in the forest. One, 1309+57, shows very narrow Lyα emission, FWHM 20 A. 1639+43 has almost no Lyα emission, which is unusual (only ∼ 1/60 of SDSS QSOs), and it is similar in this respect to the z = 4.2 radio QSO, 0918+06, discovered by Snellen et al. Snellen et al suggested that the unusually strong absorption of the Lyα line might be due to the host galaxy (in both cases this is probably a giant elliptical). A few of the QSOs have probable damped Lyα systems (DLAs, seen in ∼ 20% of high-redshift QSOs). 0941+51 has a DLA c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 at z = 3.52, and this has now been observed at high spectral resolution with WHT ISIS (Centurion et al, in preparation). The other 45 candidates are a mixed bag (see Maglioc- chetti et al 2000 for the typical distribution of identification types of all colours at 1 mJy). 1516+43 is a z = 2.59 broad- absorption-line (BAL) QSO with broad, deep SiIV and CIV absorption troughs blueward of the emission features (Fig. 5). 1035+30 (probably), 1114+29 and 1215+25 are low- redshift galaxies exhibiting narrow emission lines (Fig. 5). 18 have SEDs consistent with those of giant elliptical galax- ies at z ∼ 0.3. 23 have spectra of late-type M stars. This number is consistent with that expected for chance coinci- dences, but a few may be true radio stars (Helfand et al 1999 describe a search for counterparts of bright stars in FIRST). 5 CONCLUSIONS We have conducted a pilot search for high-redshift radio QSOs, obtaining optical spectra of 55 FIRST radio sources (S1.4GH z > 1 mJy) with red (O-E > 3) starlike optical iden- tifications. 10 of the candidates are QSOs with redshifts 3.6 < z < 4.4 (4 previously known). Six have z > 4. The re- maining 45 candidates are a mixture of low-redshift galaxies (misclassified as stellar) and M stars (mainly misidentifica- tions). The success rate (high-redshift QSOs / candidates) for this search is 1/2 for S1.4GH z > 10 mJy, and 1/9 for S1.4GH z > 1 mJy. With an effective search area of 4030 deg2, the surface density of z > 4 QSOs discovered with this technique is 0.0015 deg−2. High-redshift QSOs in FIRST 7 Fan X. et al, 2001, AJ, 121, in press, astroph/0008122 Hamann F., Ferland G., 1999, ARA&A, 37, 487 Helfand D.J., Schnee S., Becker R.H., White R.L., McMahon R.G., 1999, AJ, 117, 1568 Hook I.M., Becker R.H., McMahon R.G., White R.L., 1998, MN- RAS, 297, 1115 Irwin M.J., Ibata R.A., Lewis G.F., Totten E.J., 1998, ApJ, 505, 529 Irwin M.J., McMahon R.G., Maddox S., 1994, Spectrum no. 2., p. 14 Kauffmann G., Haehnelt M., 2000, MNRAS, 311, 576 Kennefick J.D., de Carvalho R.R., Djorgovski S.G., Wilber M.M., Dickson E.S., Weir N., 1995a, AJ, 110, 78 Kennefick J.D., Djorgovski S.G., de Carvalho R.R., 1995b, AJ, 110, 2553 Maglioccchetti M., Maddox S.J., Wall J.V., Benn C.R., Cotter G., 2000, MNRAS, 318, 1047 Myers S.T. et al, 2001, AJ, in press Pennington R.L., Humphreys, R.M., Odewahn, S.C., Zumach, W., Thurmes, P.M., 1993, PASP, 105, 521. Rauch M., 1998, ARA&A, 36, 267 Rengelink R.B., Yang T., de Bruyn A.G., Miley G.K., Bremer M.N., Rottgering H.J.A., Bremer M.A.R., 1997, A&AS, 124, 259 Richards G.T. et al, 2001, AJ, 121, 2308 Schneider D.P. et al, 2001, AJ, 121, in press, astroph/0012083 Sharp R.G., McMahon R.G., Irwin M.J., Hodgkin S.T., 2001, MNRAS, astro-ph/0103079 Snellen I.A.G, McMahon R.G., Dennett-Thorpe J., Jackson N., Mack K.-H., Xanthopoulos E., 2001, MNRAS, in press, astro- ph/0103291 Steidel C.C., Pettini M., Adelberger K.L., 2001, ApJ, astro- ph/0008283 Stern D., Djorgovski S.G., Perley R.A., de Carvalho R.R., Wall Acknowledgments J.V., 2000, AJ, 119, 1526 Storrie-Lombardi L.J., Irwin M.J., McMahon R.G., Hook I.M., 2001, MNRAS, astroph/0012446 White R.L., Becker R.H., Helfand D.J., Gregg M.D., 1997, ApJ, 475, 479 White R.L., Becker R.H., Gregg M.D., Laurent-Muehleisen S.A., 2000, ApJS, 126, 133 Zheng W. et al, 2000, AJ, 120, 1607 We are grateful to Alessandro Caccianiga (Observatorio de Lisboa) for taking spectra with the Calar Alto 2.2- m telescope. Rachel Curran and Joanna Holt were 1-year placement students at ING in 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 respectively. KHM was supported by the European Com- mission, TMR Programme, Research Network Contract ERBFMRXCT96-0034 "CERES". The William Herschel and Isaac Newton Telescopes are operated on the island of La Palma by the Royal Greenwich Observatory in the Span- ish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. The Calar Alto observatory is op- erated by the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, Heidel- berg, jointly with the Spanish National Commission for As- tronomy. The APS Catalog of POSS I (http://aps.umn.edu) is supported by NASA and the University of Minnesota. The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Tech- nology, under contract with NASA. REFERENCES Anderson S.F. et al, 2001, MNRAS, astro-ph/0103228 Becker R.H. et al, 2001, ApJS, astro-ph/0104279 Bertin E., Arnouts S., 1996, A&AS, 117, 393 Croom S.M., Smith R.J., Boyle B.J., Shanks T., Loaring N.S., Miller L., Lewis I.J., 2001, MNRAS, astro-ph/0104095 Djorgovski S.G., 2001, http://astro.caltech.ed/∼george/z4.qsos Ellison S.L., Lewis G.F., Pettini M., Sargent W.L.W., Chaffee F.H., Foltz C.B., Rauch M., Irwin M.J., 1999, PASP, 111, 946 Fan X. et al, 1999, AJ, 118, 1 c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
astro-ph/0506351	1	0506	2005-06-15T17:14:30	The masses, radii and luminosities of the components of U Geminorum	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present a phase-resolved spectroscopic study of the secondary star in the cataclysmic variable U Gem. We use our data to measure the radial velocity semi-amplitude, systemic velocity and rotational velocity of the secondary star. Combining this with literature data allows us to determine masses and radii for both the secondary star and white dwarf which are independent of any assumptions about their structure. We use these to compare their properties with those of field stars and find that both components follow field mass-radius relationships. The secondary star has the mass, radius, luminosity and photometric temperature of an M2 star, but a spectroscopic temperature of M4. The latter may well be due to a high metallicity. There is a troubling inconsistency between the radius of the white dwarf inferred from its gravitational redshift and inclination and that inferred from its temperature, flux, and astrometric distance. We find that there are two fundamental limits to the accuracy of the parameters we can derive. First the radial velocity curve of the secondary star deviates from a sinusoid, in part because of its asphericity (which can be modelled) and in part because the line flux is not evenly distributed over its surface. Second we cannot be certain which spectral type is the best match for the lines of the secondary star, and the derived rotational velocity is a function of the spectral type of the template star used.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 13 (2005) Printed 4 July 2019 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) The masses, radii and luminosities of the components of U Geminorum T. Naylor1 A. Allan1 and K.S. Long2 1School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL 2Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA ABSTRACT We present a phase-resolved spectroscopic study of the secondary star in the cat- aclysmic variable U Gem. We use our data to measure the radial velocity semi- amplitude, systemic velocity and rotational velocity of the secondary star. Combining this with literature data allows us to determine masses and radii for both the sec- ondary star and white dwarf which are independent of any assumptions about their structure. We use these to compare their properties with those of field stars and find that both components follow field mass-radius relationships. The secondary star has the mass, radius, luminosity and photometric temperature of an M2 star, but a spec- troscopic temperature of M4. The latter may well be due to a high metallicity. There is a troubling inconsistency between the radius of the white dwarf inferred from its gravitational redshift and inclination and that inferred from its temperature, flux, and astrometric distance. We find that there are two fundamental limits to the accuracy of the parameters we can derive. First the radial velocity curve of the secondary star deviates from a sinusoid, in part because of its asphericity (which can be modelled) and in part because the line flux is not evenly distributed over its surface. Second we cannot be certain which spectral type is the best match for the lines of the secondary star, and the derived rotational velocity is a function of the spectral type of the template star used. Key words: binaries: eclipsing -- white dwarfs -- stars: late-type -- stars: fundamental parameters -- stars: individual: U Gem -- novae, cataclysmic variables. 1 INTRODUCTION Precise radii and masses for the white dwarfs and late-type secondary stars in cataclysmic variables (CVs) are critical tests of our understanding of their evolution. For the sec- ondary stars there has been a long debate as to whether they follow main-sequence mass-radius and mass-temperature re- lationships. These issues are reviewed in Smith & Dhillon (1998), who concluded that, although the CV data are con- sistent with the main sequence relationships, there is such a large scatter in the CV properties that the main-sequence relationships cannot be used to predict one quantity from another. Amongst the CVs with M-type secondaries, a large part of that scatter was driven by just two systems, IP Peg and U Gem. However, these are systems whose derived pa- rameters should be amongst the most precise since they are eclipsing systems. In an earlier paper we re-visited IP Peg (Beekman et al. 2000) and brought its parameters into line with those of the other CVs of similar orbital period, making U Gem a natural next target. However, there was another, pressing reason for re-visiting the parameters of this system, in that Long & Gilliland (1999) obtained a radial velocity curve for the white dwarf. This is the first radial velocity curve of a white dwarf obtained for any CV. This not only allows an al- most assumption-free mass ratio q(= M2/M1) to be derived, but also allows one to measure the gravitational redshift to the white dwarf, which given the white dwarf mass yields its radius. In principle, therefore, one could obtain independent measurements of both the mass and radius for each of the white dwarf and secondary star. There were three obstacles to such a complete analysis. • There was no measurement of the rotational velocity of the secondary star (v2sin(i)) from which its radius could be derived assuming only that it is phase locked. • To measure the gravitational redshift of the white dwarf requires a measurement of the mean radial velocity of the red dwarf (γ2). There were two measurements of this which conflicted. • The radial velocity curve of the secondary star showed an apparent eccentricity. The best explanation for this would be that the line flux was not distributed evenly across the surface of the star, but without more data to examine the 2 T. Naylor et al residuals in detail, any corrections that should be applied to account for this were uncertain. We therefore re-observed U Gem to solve these problems. In doing so we acquired a very high quality dataset, which illuminates various problems in parameter determination. This was part of a programme to obtain phase resolved red spectroscopy of cataclysmic variables and low-mass X-ray binaries with precise correction for the telluric absorption, so that one could study the TiO bands (Webb et al. 2002; Beekman et al. 2000; Webb et al. 2000). The observational techniques used in this paper should be seen as a further improvement on the ones described in those papers. This paper is set out as follows. In Sections 2 and 3 we describe the data acquisition and reduction. The almost complete absence of interlocking assumptions then allows us to lay out the determination of the dynamical parameters in a very formal manner, discussing each parameter and its uncertainties in turn (Section 4). Our dataset is such that we discover that the uncertainties in both K2 and v2sin(i) are dominated by systematics. We then use these to obtain the physical parameters of interest in Section 5, before com- paring them to field stars in our discussion (Section 6). We finally draw our conclusions in Section 7. 2 OBSERVATIONS Spectra were obtained on the nights beginning January 4, 5, 6 and 7 2001 and January 17 2000 using the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope with the 235mm camera of the Interme- diate Dispersion Spectrograph using a 1.5 arcsec slit. The slit width corresponds to approximately two pixels at the detector, and was a compromise. On the one hand narrow- ing it further would risk undersampling in wavelength space, which would compromise the precision with which we could measure velocities. Conversely, widening it would mean that velocity shifts would be introduced if the star moved across the width of the slit. The largest possible value of these shifts corresponds to the slit width, or ±15km s−1. Since the γ ve- locity of the white dwarf is only known to this precision, and in practice the seeing would ensure the shifts were smaller than this, the slit width was a reasonable compromise. In fact, as we shall discuss later, we found that these shifts could be measured and corrected, considerably improving the quality of our data. The slit was orientated such that both U Gem and the V ≃ 15 star at α =07 55 07.08 δ =+21 59 19.7 (J2000) fell in the slit. For the majority of our spectra we used the R1200R grating which gave a resolution of 1.55A and a coverage of 7480-8320A at 0.83A/pixel. This allowed us to cover the TiO band and KI lines at 7700A and the NaI doublet at 8190A. On the last night we used the R1800V grating to cover 7855- 8335A at 0.48A/pixel with a resolution of 0.76A, covering just the NaI doublet. We used an exposure of 420s for all our U Gem spectra. Since we required accurate radial velocities we took an arc spectrum after every two spectra of U Gem. We were also concerned to ensure that the signal-to-noise in our final mean spectra (which is around 350 for the lower resolution data) was not dominated by fringing on the CCD, so at the same time as we acquired an arc, we also obtained a tungsten lamp flatfield. Since the primary aim of our observing procedure was to ensure excellent removal of the telluric absorption, we interspersed our observations of U Gem with observations of the rapidly rotating A0 star SAO78799 This star is rel- atively featureless in the range of interest, and so could be used to correct the telluric bands (see Section 3). After each observation of the A0 star we took an arc spectrum and a flatfield before moving the telescope. We also required spectra of late-type stars for cross cor- relation and to determine an accurate spectral type for U Gem. These were obtained using the same instrumental se- tups as above. Again each observation was accompanied by a flatfield and arc, along with a spectrum of a nearby A0 star, which also had its own flatfield and arc. 3 SPECTRUM EXTRACTION We treated all our observations of U Gem and the late-type stars in an identical fashion. Mean bias frames were sub- tracted from each image. We then created flatfields by calcu- lating a correction with respect to a two dimensional polyno- mial fitted through each flatfield frame, and these were used to correct the arcs and star images. Spectra were then ex- tracted from each stellar observation using an optimal tech- nique (e.g. Horne 1986). For each such spectrum an arc was extracted from the appropriate exposure, from the same re- gion of the detector as the star was extracted from. It was used to derive a polynomial relationship between pixel num- ber and wavelength, which was used to wavelength calibrate the stellar spectra. Each target spectrum was then divided by the appropriate observation of an A0 star to remove the atmospheric absorption bands. In an initial reduction of the data, we followed the telluric correction procedure developed in Beekman et al. (2000), where no interpolation of the telluric correction star onto the wavelength scale of the target was attempted as this can tend to smooth the spectra. Instead each target spec- trum pixel is simply divided by the nearest pixel in wave- length from the A0 star spectrum. In some cases this produced a rather poor telluric cor- rection, and this was traced to different positions of the tar- get star across the width of the slit, leading to small differ- ences in the wavelength calibration. We therefore cross cor- related all our target spectra and telluric correction spectra with one A-star spectrum, in the region 7624-7690A which is dominated by telluric bandheads. We then applied the de- rived shifts to the wavelength values of each data point in all our target and telluric correction spectra. Before dividing we interpolated the telluric correction stars onto the same wavelength points as their respective targets using quadratic interpolation. We also normalised the correction spectrum such that it was one in the middle of its wavelength range to preserve the overall number of counts correctly for the target. This entire procedure improved some of the correc- tions dramatically. Equally importantly, though, it corrects for the drift of U Gem across the width of the slit, a point we shall return to in Section 4.1. We could not carry out this procedure for the higher resolution data, as there is not a region of such strong telluric absorption. Each spectrum was corrected to the velocity of the so- lar system barycentre by allowing for the Earth's motion. Throughout the reduction process we propagated the un- certainties from the optimal extraction. This allowed us to identify four spectra as of significantly lower signal-to-noise than the others (probably due to cloud), which were removed from the subsequent analysis. A further spectrum was re- moved due to a charged particle event in the region used for the velocity correction procedure. This left us with 118 low resolution and 59 high resolution spectra. Figure 1 shows our final summed spectra, shifted into the reference frame of the secondary star. U Gem 3 The 118 lower mean resolution late-type spectra, corresponding tra http://www.astro.ex.ac.uk/people/timn/UGem/description.html. available star are via the CDS, or and spec- from 4 EXTRACTING THE DYNAMICAL PARAMETERS There are three parameters that we were interested in ex- tracting from our spectra. The observed radial velocity semi- amplitude of the secondary star, before correction for incli- nation (K2); the rotational velocity of the secondary star, again before allowing for inclination (v2sin(i)); and the mean velocity of the secondary star (γ2). In principle we have to measure all three parameters simultaneously. For exam- ple, we need a broadened spectral type template to cross- correlate against our individual U Gem spectra to obtain K2, but can only obtain that by first velocity shifting all the individual spectra into the rest frame of the secondary star and summing them. Of course we cannot do this without first knowing K2. We therefore adopted an iterative proce- dure outlined in the next two paragraphs, with each stage described in detail in the subsections below. We began by analysing the lower resolution spectra. An inital radial velocity curve was extracted by cross correlat- ing the NaI region of the U Gem spectra against a spectral type template. A fit to this gave an initial radial velocity semi-amplitude which we used to remove the orbital motion of the secondary star by shifting each spectrum in velocity. However, it was clear that the radial velocity curve was sig- nificantly non-sinusoidal between phases 0.25 and 0.75 (see Section 4.1.2 and Figures 3 and 4), and so we restricted these sums to the data outside this phase range. We then measured the velocity shift between the summed spectrum and the spectral type template, and then shifted the stan- dard, and broadened it so its apparent rotational velocity matched that of the secondary star. We next re-cross cor- related each U Gem spectrum with the broadened template to create a new radial velocity curve, from which we could again extract radial velocity curve parameters. We iterated around this procedure until the change in the velocity shift we applied to the spectral type template converged to within one km s−1. Having obtained an initial radial velocity solu- tion from the NaI region using one spectral type template we then used this as the starting parameters for using each spectral type template for both the NaI and KI/TiO regions. As there are a smaller number of high resolution spec- tra, and they could not be corrected in velocity for the slit drift (see Section 3) we have used them only to measure v2sin(i). Thus we coadded them using the K2 found from the lower resolution data, and then fitted broadened tem- plates, again using spectra from only phases 0.75 to 0.25. Figure 1. The mean of all spectra, summed into the rest frame of the secondary star using the parameters derived from the NaI lines using GJ213 as the spectral type template. The upper spec- trum is the sum of the lower resolution data, the lower spectrum the higher resolution data. The higher resolution data have been multiplied by 1.8 (the difference in pixel size in wavelength space). Figure 2. The mean of the low resolution spectra between phases 0.75 and 0.25 (histogram) with the best fit velocity broadened spectrum of GJ213 (line) overlaid. The wavelength regions are those over which the fitting was performed. Aside from the dynamical parameters, the final output from this procedure is a spectrum in the rest frame of the secondary star. We show these spectra for both the high and low resolution data in Figure 1. In addition, Figure 2 shows the comparison between a broadened template star, and the sum of the spectra between phase 0.75 and 0.25 for the regions we used for the cross-correlation and v2sin(i) fitting. 4 T. Naylor et al Table 1. Measured radial velocities from the NaI feature in the lower resolution spectra. The columns give the barycentric Julian Date for the middle of the exposure, the calculated phase for the exposure, the image number, radial velocity and uncertainty. The uncertainties are scaled to give a χ2 ν of one for a circular fit. All exposures are of 420s duration. BJD Phase Image Number RV (km s−1) Uncertainty (km s−1) 2 451 561.43994 2 451 561.45081 2 451 561.45612 2 451 914.41589 2 451 914.42090 2 451 914.42700 2 451 914.43201 2 451 914.44177 2 451 914.44672 2 451 914.45264 2 451 914.45758 2 451 914.46594 2 451 914.47095 2 451 914.47687 2 451 914.48181 2 451 914.49042 2 451 914.49542 2 451 914.50122 2 451 914.50616 2 451 914.51453 2 451 914.51947 2 451 914.52527 2 451 914.53027 2 451 914.53937 2 451 914.54437 2 451 914.55017 2 451 914.55518 2 451 914.56470 2 451 914.56964 2 451 914.57550 2 451 914.58044 2 451 914.58881 2 451 914.59375 2 451 914.59961 2 451 914.60455 2 451 914.61292 2 451 914.61786 2 451 914.62372 2 451 914.62866 2 451 914.63660 2 451 914.64160 2 451 914.64758 2 451 914.65253 2 451 914.65753 2 451 914.66583 2 451 914.67084 2 451 914.67657 2 451 914.68158 2 451 914.68988 2 451 914.69482 2 451 914.70062 2 451 914.70557 2 451 914.77521 2 451 914.78015 2 451 914.79144 2 451 914.79639 2 451 915.44385 2 451 915.44879 2 451 915.45428 0.5544 0.6158 0.6458 0.8262 0.8545 0.8890 0.9173 0.9725 0.0005 0.0339 0.0619 0.1091 0.1374 0.1709 0.1988 0.2475 0.2758 0.3085 0.3365 0.3838 0.4117 0.4445 0.4728 0.5242 0.5525 0.5853 0.6135 0.6674 0.6953 0.7284 0.7564 0.8036 0.8316 0.8647 0.8927 0.9399 0.9679 0.0010 0.0289 0.0738 0.1021 0.1359 0.1638 0.1921 0.2391 0.2673 0.2998 0.3281 0.3750 0.4029 0.4357 0.4637 0.8573 0.8853 0.9491 0.9770 0.6369 0.6649 0.6959 206090 206094 206095 243111 243112 243115 243116 243123 243124 243127 243128 243135 243136 243139 243140 243146 243147 243150 243151 243157 243158 243161 243162 243168 243169 243172 243173 243180 243181 243184 243185 243191 243192 243195 243196 243202 243203 243206 243207 243213 243214 243217 243218 243219 243225 243226 243229 243230 243236 243237 243240 243241 243272 243273 243280 243281 243399 243400 243403 -122 -219 -247 -253 -224 -185 -141 -49 4 63 121 193 239 262 279 299 293 280 268 210 160 106 53 -65 -125 -175 -218 -266 -293 -302 -282 -283 -251 -217 -188 -118 -73 3 60 131 181 224 254 274 282 285 287 269 224 182 128 83 -227 -192 -91 -36 -233 -255 -292 34 32 29 11 10 11 11 10 11 10 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 8 8 11 10 10 12 9 8 9 8 10 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 12 11 11 13 10 9 9 11 9 8 8 8 8 8 10 11 12 12 9 9 9 BJD Phase Image Number RV (km s−1) Uncertainty (km s−1) 2 451 915.45923 2 451 915.46637 2 451 915.47131 2 451 915.47687 2 451 915.48181 2 451 915.48926 2 451 915.49420 2 451 915.49976 2 451 915.50470 2 451 915.51202 2 451 915.51697 2 451 915.52252 2 451 915.52747 2 451 915.53467 2 451 915.53961 2 451 915.55011 2 451 915.56897 2 451 915.57391 2 451 915.57941 2 451 915.58429 2 451 916.43011 2 451 916.43506 2 451 916.44061 2 451 916.44550 2 451 916.45367 2 451 916.45862 2 451 916.46417 2 451 916.50348 2 451 916.50842 2 451 916.51398 2 451 916.51892 2 451 916.52625 2 451 916.53119 2 451 916.53674 2 451 916.54169 2 451 916.54938 2 451 916.55432 2 451 916.55981 2 451 916.56482 2 451 916.57239 2 451 916.57733 2 451 916.58282 2 451 916.58777 2 451 916.59698 2 451 916.60193 2 451 916.60748 2 451 916.61243 2 451 916.63782 2 451 916.64276 2 451 916.64838 2 451 916.65338 2 451 916.66052 2 451 916.66553 2 451 916.67114 2 451 916.67615 2 451 916.68915 2 451 916.69476 2 451 916.69977 2 451 916.70721 0.7239 0.7643 0.7922 0.8236 0.8515 0.8936 0.9216 0.9530 0.9809 0.0223 0.0503 0.0817 0.1096 0.1503 0.1783 0.2376 0.3442 0.3722 0.4032 0.4308 0.2120 0.2400 0.2714 0.2990 0.3452 0.3732 0.4046 0.6267 0.6547 0.6861 0.7140 0.7554 0.7834 0.8148 0.8427 0.8862 0.9141 0.9452 0.9735 0.0163 0.0442 0.0753 0.1032 0.1553 0.1832 0.2146 0.2426 0.3861 0.4141 0.4458 0.4741 0.5145 0.5428 0.5745 0.6028 0.6763 0.7080 0.7363 0.7784 243404 243408 243409 243412 243413 243417 243418 243421 243422 243426 243427 243430 243431 243435 243436 243440 243445 243446 243449 243450 243541 243542 243545 243546 243550 243551 243554 243559 243560 243563 243564 243568 243569 243572 243573 243577 243578 243581 243582 243586 243587 243590 243591 243595 243596 243599 243600 243632 243633 243636 243637 243641 243642 243645 243646 243651 243654 243655 243659 -292 -289 -287 -262 -235 -184 -137 -97 -33 43 63 147 208 251 284 311 253 226 192 135 287 293 290 291 248 220 201 -231 -256 -279 -297 -291 -286 -271 -247 -200 -159 -101 -55 20 63 141 174 242 277 289 286 209 162 105 53 -28 -96 -152 -193 -267 -275 -306 -269 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 11 18 39 19 20 21 23 17 14 12 13 12 9 9 9 9 9 9 24 9 8 8 8 11 9 8 8 9 9 10 9 10 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 14 12 16 11 11 20 25 U Gem 5 Figure 3. The radial velocity curve extracted from the low res- olution data by cross-correlation of the NaI lines with the M4.0 star GJ213, corrected to the solar system barycentre. The curve is the best (circular) fit to the data. 4.1 K2 4.1.1 The radial velocity curve We cross-correlated the KI/TiO (7550-7750A) and NaI (8160-8230A) regions of each spectrum with that of each spectral type template. We chose the upper limit of the TiO region to avoid the feature at 7773A, which is probably OI (Friend et al. 1988). We then fitted a sine curve to the re- sulting radial velocity curves, with the period fixed at that of Marsh et al. (1990). Each velocity was weighted according to the calculated signal-to-noise in the spectrum from which it was derived, using the region 7800-8000A for the low resolu- tion data and 8140-8250A for the high resolution data. Since we only have relative weights for the data points, we cannot assign absolute values of χ2, but the relative change in χ2 between the different fits is meaningful. We found that all the NaI fits have χ2 values within ±2 percent of each other, but the KI/TiO region gives values 20 to 80 percent larger. We therefore decided that NaI provides a better solution, and in Figure 3 we show the radial velocity curve and the best fit and in Figure 4 the residuals about that fit. Table 1 gives the individual radial velocity points. We note in passing that the RMS of the fits fell consider- ably between the initial and final radial velocity curves. This is presumably because the broadened templates match the data better, and so yield better cross-correlation functions. This leads us to believe that the reason we obtained better results in Beekman et al. (2000) from cross-correlating with a summed spectrum of IP Peg rather than the template stars was that the latter were not broadened. 4.1.2 The nature of the deviations It is immediately obvious from Figures 3 and 4 that there are systematic deviations from the best fit. There are two obvious hypotheses which might explain these deviations. The first is a region of reduced NaI absorption flux around the inner Lagrangian point. There is observational backing Figure 4. The residuals about the fit shown in Figure 3. The error bars are the relative uncertainties scaled to give a χ2 ν of one. for such an hypothesis, since surface mapping of the sec- ondary star using the radial velocity data available prior to the current work, maps the observed apparent eccentric- ity into a region of reduced NaI absorption (Davey & Smith 1992). Such a region would lead to a lack of NaI absorption on the hemisphere of the secondary star rotating towards the observer at phases around 0.4, and away from the ob- server at 0.6. Since removing flux from the blueward wing of the line will result in an apparent redshift, this would, ap- parently, explain the residuals. There are a range of possible physical causes for such a region, but it is unclear whether the region needs to be hotter or cooler than the immaculate photosphere to cause a deficit in NaI absorption. Heating will cause the overall continuum flux to rise, but will also decrease the equivalent width of the NaI line. Which effect will dominate the change in flux is unclear, though the ir- radiation calculations of Brett & Smith (1993) do yield the required decrease in NaI flux. Cool spots on the other hand may be caused by by magnetic activity (see the observations of Webb et al. 2002, and references therein), or by a com- bination of limb and gravity darkening. Again the sign of the effect on the NaI flux is unclear as in the former case there is is also a gravity effect, and in the latter the line limb and gravity darkening co-efficients are essentially unknown. Nevertheless, it appears that a spot resulting in a decrease in the NaI (and KI) flux at the stellar surface could explain the observations. The second obvious candidate is absorption of light from the secondary star as it passes through the accretion disc. Littlefair et al. (2001) have demonstrated the importance of such "mirror eclipses" in the IR, and finding their counter- part in optical data would clearly be of importance. A mirror eclipse would create further absorption in the spectrum. At phase 0.4, the star would be moving behind material moving away from the observer, and at phase 0.6 material moving towards them. This excess absorption would again create the observed effect. There is a very obvious way to choose between these models, by comparing the spectra at phases 0.4 and 0.6 with our summed spectrum taken from phases 0.75 to 0.25. The 6 T. Naylor et al Figure 5. The mean of the spectra between phase 0.75 and 0.25 (solid line) compared with the mean of spectra in the phase range 0.37 to 0.48 (left) and 0.52 to 0.63 (right). dark spot model predicts, at phase 0.4, that there will be a lack of flux on the blue wings of the line, whilst a mir- ror eclipse would predict extra absorption on the red wing. Figure 5 shows these spectra, scaled so that the continuum values are similar to the phase 0.75 to 0.25 sum, which has been overlaid on the same plots. It is reassuring that with such a simple scaling the depths of the NaI lines match so well; it implies that the majority of the variability and of the flux originates from the secondary star. If this was not the case the equivalent width of the NaI lines would not be so constant. The case at phase 0.4 seems clear-cut. The red wings of the lines are co-incident, but the blue wing of the phase 0.4 spectrum is consistently redder by between a half and one pixel (15-30 km s−1). This lack of blue absorption at this phase supports the idea of a spot. At phase 0.6 the sit- uation is more ambiguous, with the whole line being shifted bluewards by between a half and one and a half pixels (15-45 km s−1). To assess the credibility of the spot model further, we modelled the radial velocity curve of a Roche-lobe filling star using a modified version of the code first presented in Shahbaz et al. (1993). We assigned a radial velocity to each point on the grid which covers the surface of the secondary star and used the fluxes from each point to produce a line profile at that phase. As is usual in modelling rotational profiles, we normalised the velocity scale for the profile in terms of v2sin(i). Throughout the modelling we used a mass ratio q = M2/M1 =1/3, and inclination of 67 degrees. We calculated the radial velocity deviations the model would produce from a circular orbit as the first moment of the profile. As a baseline, we first calculated a model with no limb or gravity darkening. Such a model is equivalent to as- suming that the NaI flux is uniform across the surface of the star, and does not depend on the angle an element is viewed at. Figure 6 shows the result, with deviations of the correct order (0.04v2sin(i) ≃12km s−1), but at the wrong phases (0.25 and 0.75). These deviations are due to the aspheric- ity of the secondary star. The inner Lagrangian point moves Figure 6. The radial velocity shifts expected from two differ- ent models of the secondary star. The solid line is for a uniform distribution of line flux over a Roche-lobe filling secondary star for a q of 1/3. The dashed line shows the result of adding gravity darkening. faster than the mean surface of the secondary, and so when on the limb of the secondary moving towards the observer (as at phase 0.25) it produces a small blue shift with respect to the expected radial velocity curve. This effect can be ob- served in our residuals in Figure 4 but is not the dominating "problem". We next placed a spot on the inner Lagrangian point. Whilst we could have achieved this by an arbitrary dimming of the flux, we chose instead to include gravity darkening in our model, by using a "standard" gravity darkening co- efficient for a convective envelope of 0.08 (Lucy 1967). We did this not with the idea of establishing that gravity dark- ening is the cause of the dark spot, but simply to establish whether it has the correct order-of-magnitude. The result of this is again shown in Figure 6, where it can be seen that it results in two more peaks in the radial velocity curve resid- ual, of roughly the same size as those due to the asphericity of the secondary star, but now at phase 0.4 and 0.6. Before comparing this model with our residuals we sub- tracted from it the best fitting sinusoid with a fixed phase zero to simulate the effect of our fitting process. This has an amplitude of 0.01v2sin(i). The result is shown in Figure 7, where we have assumed a v2sin(i) of 115 km s−1 (see Section 4.3). The deviations due to the asphericity of the secondary star are well modelled, but it is clear we need a somewhat darker spot to reproduce the data. Furthermore, the dark spot deviations are obviously asymmetric, which cannot be explained by this simple model. However, further modelling lies beyond the scope of this work, our aim is simply to establish how far these deviations from a perfect sinusoid affect our derived parameters. 4.1.3 Deciding a value and an uncertainty The important result from Section 4.1.2 is that the result of fitting a sinusoid to the radial velocity deviations due to both the asphericity of the secondary star, and the inner U Gem 7 ondary star with previous work, it seems best to use the raw K2, i.e. without the corrections suggested either by ourselves or Friend et al. (1990). Our value of 302km s−1 should there- fore be compared with 309 ± 3km s−1 (Friend et al. 1990) and 283 ± 15 (Wade 1981). Given the uncertainty we have about our errors, these values are in agreement. 4.2 Spectroscopic Phase Zero Although this is not important for our work here, we can also use our radial velocity curve to derive a measurement of spectroscopic phase zero. We obtain a time of TDB 2 451 915.8618 or HJD 2 451 915.8611. The uncertainty is about 0.0002 day. This lies about 0.0006 day or about 1.5σ away from the extrapolation of the Marsh et al. (1990) ephemeris, after taking into account the uncertainties in the ephemeris itself. 4.3 V2sin(i) 4.3.1 Method Examination of Figure 4 shows that there are significant deviations from the radial velocity curve between phases 0.25 and 0.75, as one might expect as a result of an in- ner Lagrangian dark spot. This implies that the dark spot significantly distorts the line profile, and so if we are to de- termine the rotational velocity of the secondary star it is sensible to omit these phases. Therefore we co-added the spectra between phases 0.75 and 0.25 using the derived semi- amplitude, and then fitted them in the same wavelength regions used to derive K2, to a broadened version of the spectral type templates, along with a smoothly varying con- tinuum. We broadened the spectral type template using the analytical function appropriate for a spherical star. Each of our spectra is a time average, during which the secondary star will move along its orbit, adding a further broadening to the line profiles. To check that we had suc- ceeded in making our observations short enough to ensure this effect was negligible we calculated the maximum ex- tra broadening any spectrum should have (30 km s−1). We then pre-broadened the spectrum of the spectral-type stan- dard by this amount, and repeated our fitting procedure. This changed the derived v2sin(i) by < 4 km s−1, and so the effects of velocity smearing can be neglected. As discussed in Section 4.1.2, the non-sphericity of the secondary star has a significant effect on the radial velocity curve. Shahbaz (1998) shows that we might also expect it to affect the line profile broadening, making it significantly different from the spherical star broadening assumed in our model. To test this we used our Roche model to create a series of line profiles from phase 0.25 to 0.75, and averaged them. We then fitted this profile with our spherical model, and found that the difference in derived v2sin(i) was less than 2 percent. This is far smaller than other uncertainties in our analysis and so can be safely ignored. 4.3.2 Deciding a value and an uncertainty The statistical uncertainties in our values can be estimated by creating a χ2 grid for the two parameters, which are the Figure 7. The solid line is the model for the residuals which includes both the Roche geometry and gravity darkening (the dashed line of Figure 6). We have subtracted from this model the best fitting sine wave with the phase fixed, and then scaled it using a v2sin(i) of 115 km s−1. The circles are the residuals presented in Figure 5. Lagrangian dark spot is about 0.01v2sin(i), or about 1.2 km s−1. Clearly this is not the entire story, it looks as though the dark spot is darker than our predictions, and the asymme- try remains unexplained. We therefore apply our predicted correction, since the effects modelled in it should be present, but we should also be aware that there are probably further corrections of a similar order. If we simply take a mean of the NaI values in Table 2 and make this correction our final answer is 300 km s−1. Deciding an uncertainty for this value is not trivial. We can derive a statistical uncertainty for a the sine fit by scaling the relative error bars to yield a χ2 ν of 1, which yields around 1 km s−1. Of course, if we included the effects of asphericity and the dark spot in our model the size of error bar required to reach a χ2 ν of one would decline, along with our final uncertainty estimate. Conversely, it is clear that our symmetric model will never fit both the devi- ations at phase 0.4 and 0.6 to better than 5km s−1. Even if we used that as an uncertainty, it would never dominate the uncertainties in our final parameters for U Gem. Therefore we will ignore the uncertainty in K2 throughout this paper, and leave any future users of this measurement to use the above discussion to choose an appropriate uncertainty for their use. 4.1.4 Comparison with previous values We can now, finally, understand the apparent eccentricities found by Friend et al. (1990) and Wade (1981) of 0.027 and 0.086 respectively. If we fit our own data with an elliptical orbit we also obtain an eccentricity of about 0.024, with a significant decrease in the residuals caused by the inner La- grangian dark spot. So, it seems clear that the measured eccentricities in the orbit of U Gem are caused by these ef- fects, but that the correction for this, derived in the previous section seems to be small, ∼1 km s−1. Therefore, to compare our value for the radial velocity semi-amplitude of the sec- 8 T. Naylor et al fraction of the light from the secondary star and the rota- tional broadening. At each point in the grid we calculated the value of χ2, and then re-normalised the grid so that the best fitting model gave a χ2 ν of one. Our 1σ uncertainty is then simply the range of values of v2sin(i) which lie within a χ2 (not χ2 ν ) of 2.3 of the best fit. This procedure is con- servative in the sense that the calculated uncertainty would be smaller if we did not rescale χ2. This gives uncertainties around 10 km s−1 for either of the two regions used at low resolution, or the high resolution data. In addition to the statistical uncertainty, we must also consider the fact that there is a very obvious correlation be- tween the values of v2sin(i) given in Table 2 and the spectral type of the template used for the cross-correlation. Later spectral types gave smaller values of v2sin(i), presumably because the lines in these stars are closer to saturation, and so need less broadening to match the width of the lines of U Gem. As we shall discuss in Section 6.1 we cannot use the spectral type of the secondary star as a guide, and so we are forced to look at the values of χ2 ν to decide which fits are the most appropriate. The best NaI fits cover the range 120-130km s−1, whilst KI/TiO cover 105-130 km s−1. We therefore adopt a value of 115±15km s−1 for v2sin(i), where the uncertainty is driven by not knowing the correct tem- plate to use, as this is larger than the uncertainty derived from the χ2 analysis. 4.4 γ2 4.4.1 Method To obtain γ2 we calculated the difference in velocity between each spectral type template and the mean, velocity shifted U Gem spectrum it produced, and then added the barycentric radial velocity of the template obtained from the literature. The obvious course is to take a simple mean of all the derived γ velocities, but before doing so we will examine the values obtained as a function of both lines measured, and spectral type standard used. The most obviously discrepant values are those given by GJ1111. As indicated by the values of χ2 ν in Table 2, the broadened template for this star is a very bad fit to the data. The next most discrepant values are those for GL490B. Here the discrepancy is almost certainly due to the γ velocity as- sumed for GL490B. Most of the template star velocities are from Gizis et al. (2002), and have a accuracy of better than 1.5 km s−1, but two objects (GJ463 and GL490B) are from Reid et al. (1995). Although Reid et al. (1995) estimate the accuracy of their velocity measurements at 10km s−1, we cal- culated the differences between a given star's measured ve- locity in Reid et al. (1995) and that in Marcy et al. (1987). The velocities in the latter have uncertainties of less than 1km s−1. This gave an RMS of 14km s−1 for the 58 stars. Using this uncertainty, the measurements for GL490B are in agreement with the other measurements, excepting GJ1111. To check that different spectral features did not give discrepant values for γ2 we could have taken a simple mean of the velocities for the five remaining objects (four in the case of the higher resolution data) for each wavelength range. However, if we are to exclude GL490B on the grounds it has a poor determination of its systemic velocity, we must also exclude GJ463. After removing this star we see from the RMS (which is, admittedly derived from a small number of values) that the KI/TiO measurements are in agreement with both the high and low resolution NaI velocities. 4.4.2 Deciding a value and an uncertainty Given the above discussion, it seems we can take a very direct approach and simply take the mean of all the mea- surements for the four good radial velocity standards. This gives a final measurement of 29±6 km s−1, where the uncer- tainty is simply the standard error. In principle the errors in the measurements of the velocities of the standards will add correlations to our 11 measurements, but this is small com- pared with our final uncertainty. We may also have added a little noise by including the high resolution data (which originate from fewer spectra), but as we shall see later, the final uncertainty in the gravitational redshift of the white dwarf is governed not by this error, but by the uncertainty in γ1. 4.4.3 Comparison with previous work One of the most important aims of this work was to decide between the two contradictory measurements for γ2 of 46±6 km s−1 Friend et al. (1990) and 84.9 ± 9.9 Wade (1981). Our data clearly favour the Friend et al. (1990) result, the difference between the two being at the 2σ level. 4.5 Final dynamical parameters We summarise our values for the dynamical parameters as follows. K2=300 km s−1, with an uncertainty which is unclear, but small enough to have an insignificant impact on what follows. v2sin(i)=115±15km s−1, where the uncer- tainty in the appropriate spectral type to use dominates our error budget. γ2=29±6 km s−1, where the signal-to-noise in our spectra is probably responsible for the majority of the uncertainty. 5 PHYSICAL PARAMETERS We can now use our measurements of the dynamical param- eters, to derive the physical parameters of interest. 5.1 The Mass Ratio ratio M2/M1 simply the ratio K1/K2. The mass Long & Gilliland (1999) give K1 = 107.1±2.1 km s−1, which when combined with our value of K2 yields 0.357±0.007. is 5.2 The Inclination The eclipse morphology of U Gem gives quite tight con- straints on the inclination. The eclipse is thought to be that of the bright spot and edge of the disc, not the white dwarf (Warner & Nather 1971), an idea supported by the delay between spectroscopic phase zero and mid-eclipse (Wade 1981). For a q of 0.357, the system would eclipse the white dwarf if i >74 degrees. For our derived mass ratio we expect the disc to be no larger than 0.66RL1 (Paczynski 1977), a Table 2. Measured Parameters. Columns 1-3 give the spectral type, name and assumed γ velocity for each spectral type standard. Columns 4-5 give the values of K2 derived from the NaI and KI/TiO features in the lower resolution spectra. Columns 6-11 give the results for velocity broadening the spectral type templates to match the mean U Gem spectrum. For each parameter we give the values derived from the NaI and KI/TiO features in the lower resolution spectra, and from the NaI feature in the higher resolution spectra. Thus columns 6-8 give the best fitting values of v2sin(i) and (in brackets) the associated χ2 ν , and columns 9-11 the implied fraction of the light originating from the secondary star. Columns 12-14 give the derived values of γ2 for U Gem, again from the lower resolution NaI and KI/TiO range, and the higher resolution NaI range. U Gem 9 % from secondary Hi (8) NaI KI/TiO (9) (10) Hi (11) γ2 (km s−1) NaI KI/TiO (12) (13) Hi (14) Radial Velocity standard Type Name γ K2 (km s−1) (km s−1) NaI KI/TiO (1) (2) GJ463 GL109 GL490B GJ213 GL51 M3 M3 M4 M4 M5 M5.5 GL65A M6 GJ1111 (3) 21 30 -23 106 -7 22 8 (4) 302 301 301 301 302 301 301 (5) 305 303 303 303 300 296 289 v2sin(i) (km s−1) KI/TiO (7) 143 (2.8) 140 (2.4) 116 (2.3) 129 (2.3) 105 (2.2) 96 (2.7) 128 (3.4) NaI (6) 142 (3.1) 139 (2.9) 130 (2.3) 132 (2.7) 119 (2.6) 118 (2.9) 110 (3.1) Mean (GL109, GJ213, GL51, GL65A) Standard error 116 104 76 98 58 61 50 109 84 51 64 38 31 26 121 (1.0) 118 (1.1) 106 (1.1) 110 (1.1) 38 30 11 18 24 25 43 24 5 43 34 18 30 37 39 66 34 4 77 67 53 44 , 30 25 28 48 27 3 (4) (5) M1 = K 3 2 P 2πG sin3(i) (cid:16)1 + 2 K1 K2(cid:17) which yields M1 = 0.91 ± 0.01M⊙ sin3(i) . The uncertainty here should be treated with some scepticism as it includes just the uncertainty in K1, not that from K2, for reasons discussed in Section 4.1.3. Given our range of inclinations, this leads to a range for M1 of 1.02 to 1.32M⊙. The radius of the white dwarf can now be determined from the gravitational redshift (γ1 − γ2) as R1 = GM1 c(γ1 − γ2) , (6) where c is the velocity of light. Long & Gilliland (1999) mea- sured γ1 as 172±15km s−1. If we subtract from this our value for γ2 of 29 km s−1 we derive a gravitational redshift for the white dwarf of 143±15km s−1. We use this in Figure 8 to summarise the constraints on M1. 6 DISCUSSION 6.1 The Secondary Star The first question to settle is whether the star lies on the main-sequence mass radius relationship. Although small, the uncertainties cover all the mass-radius relationships given in Figure 2 of Smith & Dhillon (1998). This is still true if we tighten the mass constraint to that given by using the tighter limits on the inclination given by Smak (2001). Where the problem lies with the secondary star is the spectral type. In Figure 9 we plot the spectral type of field M-stars given in Reid et al. (1995) and Hawley et al. (1996) which have masses in Delfosse et al. (2000) against mass. Given its mass, we would expect the secondary in U Gem to be an M2 star. Interestingly that is exactly the conclu- sion reached by Harrison et al. (2000) on entirely different radius which would just be eclipsed if i=62 degrees. The in- clination must, therefore, lie in the range 68±6 degrees. Con- veniently, the mid-point of this range is close to the 69±2 degrees given by the most recent of determinations of the inclination from detailed bright spot analysis (Smak 2001, and references therein). 5.3 The mass of the secondary star From Kepler's Law it is easy to show that the mass of the secondary star is M2 = K 3 1 P 2πG sin3(i) (cid:16)1 + K2 K1(cid:17)2 . Given our values derived above, this gives M2 = 0.34 ± 0.02M⊙ sin3(i) , (1) (2) where the uncertainty originates from the uncertainty in K1. If we wish to derive a value independent of sin(i), then taking the range of values of the inclination from above, we find that M2 = 0.44 ± 0.06, since we can ignore the uncertainty in K1. It is worth emphasising that this is an absolute limit, not a 1σ uncertainty. 5.4 The radius of the secondary star The radius of the secondary is R2 = P vsin(i) 2πsin(i) = 0.40 ± 0.05R⊙/sin(i). (3) In fact the uncertainty in sin(i) (4 percent) is smaller than the uncertainty in our measurement of v2sin(i), so we take the mid-point of the range in sin(i) to obtain R2 = 0.43 ± 0.06R⊙. 5.5 The mass and radius of the primary The analogous formula to equation 1 for the primary is 10 T. Naylor et al Figure 8. The constraints in the mass-radius plane for the white dwarf. This is essentially an updated version of Figure 7 of Long & Gilliland (1999) and Figure 4 of Long (2000). The gravitational redshift and inclination constrain the white dwarf to lie within the box delineated by the solid lines. The white dwarf mass is primarily limited by the measurement of K2 and the inclination limits of 62 to 74 degrees. (There is, in addition, a weaker depen- dence on q.) Our measurement of the gravitational redshift to the white dwarf restricts the white dwarf to lie between the two lines marked γ2 − γ1. The Hamada-Salpeter mass-radius relationship intersects the box, but is somewhat above the radius predicted by the inclination of 69 degrees which originates from studies of the bright spot. The photometric radius (see text) lies between the two horizontal dotted lines, well above the dynamical limits. Figure 9. The mass of M-type field stars as a function of spectral type from Reid et al. (1995) and Hawley et al. (1996) The dotted line is an unweighted linear fit. grounds. They showed that the absolute magnitude of the secondary star, and the optical/IR spectral energy distribu- tion were well matched by an M2 star with a white dwarf and a faint, power-law accretion continuum. The problem arises because our best fits of spectral type standards to the spectrum of U Gem imply a spectral type of M4 or M5 (all our spectral types are also from Reid et al. 1995). This is perfectly consistent with the results obtained by similar methods by other workers; M4+ (Friend et al. 1990) and M4.5 (Wade 1981; Stauffer et al. 1979). One may be able to solve this inconsistency if the sec- ondary star in U Gem has a high metallicity. Figure 9 shows that there is a spread in spectral type at any given mass. For example, there is an M3.5 star with a mass of 0.415M⊙, which if it were the analogue of the secondary star in U Gem may come close to solving the discrepancy. It is GJ2069A, actually a binary with a mean mass of 0.415M⊙ (Delfosse et al. 1999), and a spectral type of M3.5 (Reid et al. 1995). Delfosse et al. (2000) suggest that the late spectral type is due to high metallicity, with [M/H]=0.5. One could then explain our cross-correlation results as fol- lows. If the star is of high metallicity, the lines will be closer to saturation than one might expect for an M2 star. As such the line shapes and relative depths of the bandheads will be closer to that of a later type, solar metallicity star, which has stronger lines. The χ2 fitting procedure, which attempts to match line shapes and bandheads (but not the equivalent widths because of the accretion continuum) will give a lower χ2 ν for the later spectral type star. Further evidence that this is the case comes from the fraction of the light which our fit- ting procedure gives as originating from the secondary star (see Table 2). The fraction increases with earlier spectral types, already reaching 100 percent for M3, and presumably would be even higher for an M2 spectral type standard. Such behaviour is simply explained if the secondary is an M2 star with line strengths enhanced by a high metallicity. There is one potential problem with the high metallic- ity explanation, in that it would also reduce the absolute magnitude. Ribas (2003) does indeed find that the absolute K-band magnitude of GJ2069A is 0.35 mag fainter than stars of comparable mass. However, such a small change in absolute magnitude corresponds to about a third of a spec- tral sub-class, and so would not affect the conclusions of Harrison et al. (2000), based on the absolute magnitude of U Gem. In summary, the observations are consistent with the idea that the secondary star in U Gem is an M2 dwarf with high metallicity. In terms of mass, radius and luminosity it is indistinguishable from similar field M dwarfs. 6.2 The broader "cool secondary" problem There have been suggestions for many years that the sec- ondary stars in CVs may be too cool for their mass. If we extrapolate from the observations of U Gem, then the prob- lem is not that they are too cool, but simply have a spectral type which is later than that for a solar metallicity star of the same effective temperature. Smith & Dhillon (1998) appar- ently showed that such claims were incorrect, by comparing the mass-spectral-type relation for CV secondary stars with that for field stars, derived from eclipsing binaries. Their argument was that the spread in spectral types of CV sec- ondaries at a given mass was matched by the spread in field stars. For the field M-stars, the spread they referred to was driven by the high mass for the probably-metal-rich GJ2069A. Conversely, the spread in spectral types for the CV secondary stars was driven by the high masses of two objects. First U Gem, whose mass this work revises down- U Gem 11 the Hamada-Salpeter mass-radius relationship. To make all three consistent implies that the "preferred" inclination of 69 degrees (see Section 5.2) seems to be a little too high. However, this conclusion should be tempered with the re- alisation that field white dwarfs do not appear to follow this relationship closely. Provencal et al. (1998) show that a large number of white dwarfs apparently fall below this relationship, for reasons which are not clear. The factor is up to about 20 percent, which would be sufficient to solve the discrepancy. One can also estimate the radius from the FUV spec- trum and the distance, as was discussed by Long & Gilliland (1999) and Long (2000). Their results, scaled to re- flect the new (and larger) astrometric distance of 100pc (Harrison et al. 2004) are also plotted in Figure 8, and in- dicate a white dwarf radius of 5.7 × 108cm, which we shall refer to as the photometric radius. The uncertainties in this value are small. The uncertainty in the parallax is about 5 percent, and hence contributes 5 percent to the uncertainty in radius. The overall flux level of the HST spectra is uncer- tain at the 10 percent level, which translates to a further 5 percent uncertainty in radius. This yields an overall uncer- tainty of 7 percent, or a radius of 5.7 ± 0.4 × 108cm. This figure is inconsistent with our value of the radius derived from γ2 − γ1. This discrepancy is not straightforward to re- solve. Lower inclinations give a larger white dwarf radius, so if we take the lowest possible inclination, we still find that γ2 − γ1 implies a radius of only 4.13 ± 0.44 × 108cm, which differs from the photometric radius at the 2.5σ level. Worse still this would place the white dwarf well above the Hamada-Salpeter radius. If we wish to make the photomet- ric radius consistent with the Hamada-Salpeter radius we require γ2 − γ1=80km s−1, which is far outside our error bars. One possible solution is to posit another UV component in the spectrum (Long et al. 1993). The UV flux in U Gem declines slowly during quiescent intervals. However, as was first noted by Kiplinger et al. (1991), the decline in flux is not consistent with the temperature derived from modelling the spectra in terms of a uniform temperature white dwarf. When modelled as a single temperature white dwarf the tem- perature of the white dwarf is hottest and the radius smallest just after outburst. Long et al. (1993, 1995) suggested, based on 850-1850A spectra obtained with the Hopkins Ultravio- let Telescope, that the discrepancy might be resolved if the outburst left behind a hot accretion belt on the surface of the white dwarf that slowly decayed. Other possibilities for the second component include emission caused by heating of the white dwarf due to ongoing accretion and/or emission from the inner disc. The inclusion of a second component does sometimes reduce the estimated radius of the white dwarf. However, it is difficult to make such a second com- ponent quantitatively plausible. For example a white dwarf with a temperature of 30,000 K and a radius of 4 × 108 cm at a distance of 100 pc would produce only about half of the observed UV flux. As a result, to reduce the inferred radius from 5.7 × 108 to 4 × 108cm requires either that the second component contributes about the same flux as the first component, or that the second component causes the temperature of the first component to be underestimated by order 10,000K, or some combination thereof. Based on our experience and the fact that the white dwarf in U Gem Figure 10. Mass of M-type secondary stars in CVs as a function of spectral type from Smith & Dhillon (1998) with revisions for U Gem from this work and IP Peg from Beekman et al. (2000). The dotted line is an unweighted linear fit to the field star data of Figure 9. wards by 30 percent, and secondly IP Peg, whose mass we revised downwards by almost a factor two in Beekman et al. (2000). We have plotted therefore, in Figure 10, the spectral types for CVs with well determined secondary star masses from Smith & Dhillon (1998) with the revisions for U Gem and IP Peg. Compared with the data available to Smith & Dhillon (1998), there are now many more accurate field star masses, which we have represented in Figure 10 by an unweighted linear fit. The data suggest that, on average, CV secondaries show a tendency to be over-massive for their spectral types. For example, two of the best determinations, IP Peg and U Gem lie at later spectral types than any field object of similar mass. However, this tendency is small (up to about 2 sub-types) and we agree with Smith & Dhillon (1998) that it is the spread in both the field and CV mass/spectral-type relation, rather than any systematic shift, which precludes the use of mass to spectral-type conversions. There is current theoretical interest in explaining dif- ferences between the observed spectral type and the spec- tral type predicted by the mass of the star (e.g. Kolb et al. 2001). Our results suggest strongly that any such compari- son should be carried out between the models and the pho- tometric spectral type, not the spectroscopic one. 6.3 The White Dwarf We can use our data to test whether the white dwarf prop- erties are similar to those of field white dwarfs. From our data we can test whether it follows a similar mass radius relationship, and whether its luminosity is that expected for its radius and temperature. To begin with the mass and radius, we have placed on Figure 8 the Hamada-Salpeter mass-radius relationship as parameterised in Anderson (1988). The range of masses and radii implied by the gravitational redshift in combination with the estimates of the inclination are consistent with 12 T. Naylor et al is by far the best studied white dwarf in a dwarf nova, we are sceptical the errors in the existing spectral analyses are large enough to easily reconcile the two ways of estimating the radius of the white dwarf in U Gem. In summary, the mass and radius of the white dwarf deduced from the gravitational redshift and binary inclina- tion are consistent with those for field stars, but inconsistent with the radius deduced from the astrometric parallax, tem- perature and observed UV flux. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Isaac Newton Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Ob- servatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. We thank Stuart Littlefair for useful discussions, and the referee Robert Smith for a careful read- ing and useful suggestions. Computing was performed on the Exeter node of the Starlink network, funded by PPARC. 6.4 Determining q using v2sin(i) A technique frequently used in studies of cataclysmic vari- ables is to measure q using v2sin(i) and K2. This uses the fact that v2sin(i) K2 = (1 + q) R2 a . (7) Since we have a measure of q which is independent of v2sin(i) we can test the validity of this method. We find that v2sin(i)/K2 = 0.38 ± 0.05. If we now use the approximation for R2/a due to Eggleton (1983) we find that q = 0.41±0.03, which is consistent with (though less accurate than) the value determined using K1, giving us confidence in parame- ters determined for this and other systems using v2sin(i). 7 CONCLUSIONS Our primary conclusions are as follows. • The mass and radius of the white dwarf in U Gem de- termined from the gravitational redshift and inclination are indistinguishable from a field white dwarf. However, the ra- dius deduced from the UV spectrum and astrometric paral- lax is inconsistent with this kinematic determination. Fur- ther analysis and/or observations are required to understand whether the kinematic and spectroscopic information can be reconciled. This is important since U Gem is the proto- typical dwarf nova. • The secondary star in U Gem is indistinguishable in mass and radius from a field M2 dwarf. However, the spec- troscopic spectral type is later than might be expected, but this can be explained if it is of higher than solar metallicity. • The M-stars in cataclysmic variables seem, as a group to be around 1 spectral sub-type cooler than might be expected from their mass or radius. There is a scatter about the mean mass/spectral type relationship of about a sub-type. On our way to reaching these conclusions we have dis- covered the following. • We have tested the determination of the mass ratio us- ing the rotational velocity of the secondary star, and shown (at least in the case of U Gem) it gives answers consistent with other data. • However, the uncertainty in the derived rotational ve- locity is dominated by the uncertainty in choosing which spectral type star should used for the cross-correlation. • The uncertainty in the radial velocity semi-amplitude of the secondary star is dominated by effects at the few km s−1 level which are due to the asphericity of the secondary star and non-uniformities in the distribution of the line flux over its surface. REFERENCES Anderson N., 1988, ApJ, 325, 266 Beekman G., Somers M., Naylor T., Hellier C., 2000, MN- RAS, 318, 9 Brett J. M., Smith R. C., 1993, MNRAS, 264, 641 Davey S., Smith R. C., 1992, MNRAS, 257, 476 Delfosse X., Forveille T., Mayor M., Burnet M., Perrier C., 1999, A&A, 341, L63 Delfosse X., Forveille T., S´egransan D., Beuzit J.-L., Udry S., Perrier C., Mayor M., 2000, A&A, 364, 217 Eggleton P. P., 1983, ApJ, 268, 368 Friend M. T., Martin J. S., Smith R. C., Jones D. H. P., 1990, MNRAS, 246, 637 Friend M. T., Smith R. C., Martin J. S., Jones D. H. P., 1988, MNRAS, 233, 451 Gizis J. E., Reid I. N., Hawley S. L., 2002, AJ, 123, 3356 Harrison T. E., Johnson J. J., McArthur B. E., Benedict G. F., Szkody P., Howell S. B., Gelino D. M., 2004, AJ, 127, 460 Harrison T. E., McNamara B. J., Szkody P., Gilliland R. L., 2000, AJ, 120, 2649 Hawley S. L., Gizis J. E., Reid I. N., 1996, AJ, 112, 2799 Horne K., 1986, PASP, 98, 609 Kiplinger A. L., Sion E. M., Szkody P., 1991, ApJ, 366, 569 Kolb U., King A. R., Baraffe I., 2001, MNRAS, 321, 544 Littlefair S. P., Dhillon V. S., Marsh T. R., Harlaftis E. T., 2001, MNRAS, 327, 475 Long K. S., 2000, New Astronomy Review, 44, 125 Long K. S., Blair W. P., Bowers C. W., Davidsen A. F., Kriss G. A., Sion E. M., Hubeny I., 1993, ApJ, 405, 327 Long K. S., Blair W. P., Raymond J. C., 1995, ApJ, 454, L39+ Long K. S., Gilliland R. L., 1999, ApJ, 511, 916 Lucy L. B., 1967, Zeitschrift fur Astrophysics, 65, 89 Marcy G. W., Lindsay V., Wilson K., 1987, PASP, 99, 490 Marsh T. R., Horne K., Schlegel E. M., Honeycutt R. K., Kaitchuck R. H., 1990, ApJ, 364, 637 Paczynski B., 1977, ApJ, 216, 822 Provencal J. L., Shipman H. L., Hog E., Thejll P., 1998, ApJ, 494, 759 Reid I. N., Hawley S. L., Gizis J. E., 1995, AJ, 110, 1838 Ribas I., 2003, A&A, 398, 239 Shahbaz T., 1998, MNRAS, 298, 153 Shahbaz T., Naylor T., Charles P. A., 1993, MNRAS, 265, 655 Smak J. I., 2001, Acta Astronomica, 51, 279 Smith D. A., Dhillon V. S., 1998, MNRAS, 301, 767 Stauffer J., Spinrad H., Thorstensen J., 1979, PASP, 91, 59 Wade R. A., 1981, ApJ, 246, 215 Warner B., Nather R. E., 1971, MNRAS, 152, 219 Webb N. A., Naylor T., Ioannou Z., Charles P. A., Shahbaz T., 2000, MNRAS, 317, 528 Webb N. A., Naylor T., Jeffries R. D., 2002, ApJ, 568, L45 This paper has been typeset from a TEX/ LATEX file prepared by the author. U Gem 13
astro-ph/9511015	1	9511	1995-11-02T20:44:00	Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Lensing Cluster Abell 2218	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present a striking new Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observation of the rich cluster Abell 2218 taken with the Wide-Field and Planetary Camera (WFPC2). HST's restored image quality reveals a sizeable number of gravitationally-lensed features in this cluster, significantly more than had been identified using ground-based telescopes. The brightest arcs are resolved by HST and show internal features enabling us to identify multiply-imaged examples, confirming and improving the mass models of the cluster determined from ground-based observations. Although weak lensing has been detected statistically in this and other clusters from ground-based data, the superlative resolution of HST enables us to individually identify weakly distorted images more reliably than hitherto, with important consequences for their redshift determination. Using an improved mass model for the cluster calibrated with available spectroscopy for the brightest arcs, we demonstrate how inversion of the lensing model can be used to yield the redshift distribution of $\sim$80 faint arclets to $R\simeq25$. We present a new formalism for estimating the uncertainties in this inversion method and review prospects for interpreting our results and verifying the predicted redshifts.	astro-ph	astro-ph	HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS OF THE LENSING CLUSTER ABELL J.-P. Kneib, R.S. Ellis, I. Smail, W.J. Couch & R.M. Sharples ) Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB HA, U.K. ) The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA - ) School of Physics, University of NSW, Sydney , NSW Australia ) Dept. of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH LE, U.K. Received ; accepted 5 9 v o N 2 5 1 0 1 1 5 9 / h p - o r t s a { { ABSTRACT We present a striking new Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observation of the rich cluster Abell taken with the Wide-Field and Planetary Camera (WFPC). HST's restored image quality reveals a sizeable number of gravitationally-lensed features in this cluster, signi(cid:12)cantly more than had been identi(cid:12)ed using ground-based telescopes. The brightest arcs are resolved by HST and show internal features enabling us to identify multiply-imaged examples, con(cid:12)rming and improving the mass models of the cluster determined from ground-based observations. Although weak lensing has been detected statistically in this and other clusters from ground-based data, the superlative resolution of HST enables us to individually identify weakly distorted images more reliably than hitherto, with important consequences for their redshift determination. Using an improved mass model for the cluster calibrated with available spectroscopy for the brightest arcs, we demonstrate how inversion of the lensing model can be used to yield the redshift distribution of (cid:24) faint arclets to R ' . We present a new formalism for estimating the uncertainties in this inversion method and review prospects for interpreting our results and verifying the predicted redshifts. Subject headings: cosmology: observations { galaxies: evolution { gravitational lensing { { Introduction . The gravitational lensing of faint background galaxies by rich clusters is emerging as a very promising method to constrain both the distribution of dark matter in clusters and the statistical redshift distribution of galaxies beyond the reach of conventional spectrographs (Fort & Mellier ). The lensing distortion induced in the image of a typical distant galaxy by a foreground rich cluster depends upon the product of a scale factor (involving the galaxy and cluster redshifts and the adopted cosmological model) and the second derivatives of the pro jected cluster potential. The ma jority of the faint lensed images are only weakly distorted and these are termed \arclets". However, a small fraction are highly distorted \giant arcs" { images which lie near critical lines and su(cid:11)er high ampli(cid:12)cation; these are particularly helpful in mass modelling since their relatively bright magnitudes mean that they can often be studied spectroscopically. With redshifts for one or more giant arcs in a cluster the absolute mass of the central regions can be accurately determined. Multiply-imaged sources, even without redshifts, provide additional information on the geometrical con(cid:12)guration of the potential well in the core regions (Mellier et al. , Smail et al. a). Recent work has concentrated on clusters with arcs of known redshift and multiply-imaged sources. In such cases, a robust model of the cluster mass can be constructed, allowing inversion of the lens equations for the arclet population and yielding the redshift distribution of extremely faint galaxies.For the well-studied cluster Abell (zcl = :), Kneib et al. ( a) demonstrated a (cid:12)rst application of this inversion technique by identifying (cid:24) candidate arclets with axial ratios a=b (cid:24)> : from ground-based images taken in superlative conditions. For each arclet, unlensed magnitudes and probable redshifts to a limit of B ' were inferred from a detailed mass model calibrated by the redshift of a giant arc and the properties of various multiple images (Kneib et al. ). However, this new technique su(cid:11)ered from several uncertainties. Firstly, simple mass models may ignore substructure in the cluster mass distribution leading to imprecise inversion. Also, in the absence of spectroscopic or morphological data, some of the candidate multiply-imaged ob jects used to model the form of the potential may be spuriously identi(cid:12)ed in ground-based data. { { Finally, even in the best ground-based conditions, the limited angular resolution makes it di(cid:14)cult to distinguish lensed arclets from intrinsically-elongated faint sources and to accurately measure their shapes; such confusion may lead to contamination of the inverted redshift distribution by cluster members, foreground spirals, and close galaxy pairs. Even in its aberrated state the advantages of HST for lensing studies over the best ground-based telescopes soon became evident (Smail et al. b). Here we illustrate that the refurbished HST is even more powerful, allowing reliable identi(cid:12)cation of multiple images and faint arclets. Considerable progress is thus possible with HST in the inversion method developed by Kneib et al. ( a). A plan of the paper follows. Section describes the observations and gives a qualitative description of the HST images, including those lensed features which allow us to improve the ground-based model of Kneib et al. ( ). Section describes the improved mass model we have implemented. Starting from the mass model of a cluster, Section introduces the theory of the lens inversion and discuss the probability distribution of the redshift of a sheared galaxy. The sources of uncertainty in this inversion are also discussed in the context of observational data. In Section we present our results on the faint (cid:12)eld galaxy redshift distribution and discusses both the limitations of comparing such results with model predictions as well as the prospects for verifying the inverted redshifts with further observations. Section summarises the overall conclusions of the paper. Throughout this paper, we assume H= km s(cid:0) Mpc(cid:0) , (cid:10)= and (cid:3) = . . Observations and Analysis .. Previous Observations of Abell Abell (Fig. a), is one of the best-studied rich clusters at intermediate redshift (zcl = :). Le Borgne et al. ( ) present a detailed photometric and spectroscopic survey of the cluster and derive a rest-frame velocity dispersion of (cid:27)cl = +(cid:0) km s(cid:0) , indicative of a { { deep potential well. This is supported by a high X-ray luminosity (Lx(.-. keV) = .(cid:2) ergs s(cid:0) ) and a strong Sunyaev-Zeldovich decrement (Jones et al. , Birkinshaw & Hughes ). The cluster contains a number of luminous giant arcs, discovered and extensively studied by Pell(cid:19)o et al. ( , ). Several of the brighter arcs have been observed spectroscopically; redshifts for these and ground-based colors for other lensed features provide the basic ingredients for the recent mass model of Kneib et al. ( ). Using four systems of arcs and possible counter-arcs, tentatively identi(cid:12)ed from ground-based colors (# , # -#, #-# and # in the numbering scheme of Le Borgne et al. ( )), Kneib et al. ( ) determine a mass distribution for the cluster core which is bimodal in form and concentrated around the two most luminous cluster galaxies (# , #, Table ). .. HST Observations and Photometric Catalogue Abell was observed by the HST WFPC- camera on September , . Three exposures totalling sec were taken through the FW (cid:12)lter. Each exposure was shifted relative to the others by WFC pixels (. arcsec) providing a partial overlap of the chip (cid:12)elds. After pipeline processing, standard IRAF/STSDAS routines were employed to shift and combine the frames to remove both cosmic rays and hot pixels. We discard the PC chip from our analysis because of its brighter isophotal limit. The (cid:12)nal frame comprising the WFC chips (Fig. a & b) has an e(cid:11)ective resolution of . arcsec and a (cid:27) detection limit per resolution element of R ' . We convert our instrumental FW magnitudes into standard R using the synthetic zero point and color corrections listed in Holtzman et al. ( ). For the color term we choose (V (cid:0) R) ' : typical of the faint (cid:12)eld population (Smail et al. d). The color correction is +: mag, and the typical photometric errors of our faintest ob jects, R < :, are (cid:14)R (cid:24).{.. To produce a catalogue of faint arclets from our data we (cid:12)rst analysed the HST image using the Sextractor package (Bertin , Bertin & Arnouts ). All ob jects with isophotal areas above pixels (. arcsec ) at the (cid:22)R = : mag arcsec(cid:0) isophote ((cid:27)/pixel) were selected. A comparison of the di(cid:11)erential number counts of these images to deep ground-based R counts { { (Smail et al. d) shows a marked excess of galaxies brighter than R (cid:24) : due to cluster members (Figure ), and a steep roll-over in the observed counts beyond R (cid:24) arising from an incompleteness which amounts to % in the R = { bin. We thus applied a magnitude limit of R = giving a total of images over a . sq. arcmin area. A neural-network algorithm (Bertin & Arnouts ) was used to separate stars and galaxies leading to the exclusion of star-like ob jects from the catalogue. From this list we selected a sample of candidate arclets, (cid:12)rst removing all galaxies with R < : (probable cluster members) and ob jects lying in the halos of giant ellipticals and very faint ob ject R > as their photometry and shapes are uncertain. The procedure reduced our catalog to (cid:24) arclet candidates. .. Multiply-Imaged Features At this stage, it is useful to review the multiply-imaged features identi(cid:12)ed on the HST image in the context of the ground-based predictions, prior to using them to improve the mass model of Kneib et al. ( ). Four bright arcs and counter-arcs were identi(cid:12)ed as matching images by Kneib et al. ( ) on the basis of their ground-based colours. Each of these is clearly resolved by HST with internal structures that enable us to verify their multiply-imaged nature (see Fig. c of Smail et al. b). We discuss each of these images here and summarise their photometric properties in Table . # and # # is a most impressive arc system with an internally-symmetric pattern of unresolved knots showing that this image is clearly formed from the merger of two images of reversed parity. This enables the location of the critical line to be accurately identi(cid:12)ed. The knots, which presumably represent HII regions in a blue star-forming galaxy, can also be seen in the counter image #. A further feature of interest is the train-track-like morphology of the source, also replicated in #. # , #, # and # The red arc # has a spectroscopic redshift of z = : and { { shows no internal structure; this is consistent with its identi(cid:12)cation as a background spheroidal galaxy. It was naturally interpreted as a fold arc i.e. two merging images (Kneib et al. ) with a single counter-image #. The absence of a strong discontinuity (even in the HST image) in the surface brightness along the # arc can be explained if the surface brightness peak lies just outside (or on) the caustic on the source plane. However, a detailed inspection of the HST image demonstrates that this simple picture is unlikely to be correct as a faint extension of # is now revealed which merges with #. From the ground-based data it was noticed that # & # had similar colours to # but no simple model was able to explain such a con(cid:12)guration. If # is indeed a counter-image of arc # , then we may consider whether # is also a counter-image. In Section , we will show that, by incorporating individual cluster galaxies in the mass model, it is straightforward to show that # is a fold-arc with #, # and # each as counter-images. # In contrast to # , the blue arc # with a spectroscopic redshift of z = : exhibits a large amount of internal structure. Although the arc is luminous and therefore probably highly magni(cid:12)ed, the bright southern end does not appear particularly strongly sheared and is apparently not multiply-imaged. Close inspection of the northern section of this arc indicates that it extends across the halo of the cluster galaxy #. The complex morphology can thus be explained via a background galaxy straddling the caustic. The ma jority of the source lies outside the caustic producing a single highly magni(cid:12)ed, weakly sheared image. The portion within the caustic is multiply-imaged and produces the highly elongated tail across the halo of #. A detailed examination of the HST image reveals several new potentially-important multiply-imaged systems. # This very faint thin arc was suggested as a possible lensed feature in the ground-based data but is clearly veri(cid:12)ed as such by HST. The faintness makes it di(cid:14)cult to identify the individual sub-components at this stage, although a number of bright knots are visible. Nevertheless, the structure suggests a likely cusp arc as three components can be distinguished. H{, H{ These are two impressive multiply-imaged systems which were unrecognised in the { { ground-based studies (Fig. b). From the morphologies and positions, H{ appear to be three images of a section of the disk of #, the remainder of the source being only singly-imaged. The very faint features H{ ( R(cid:25)) are believed to represent a new very faint multiply-imaged pair. Several candidates for the counter-image to this pair exist on the opposite side of the cluster. # + H. # is a fold arc (two merging images) with H as a counter image. In summary, the HST image not only allows us to con(cid:12)rm the lensed features that underpin the ground-based mass model, but also provides additional information that enables us to re(cid:12)ne the model. We have identi(cid:12)ed a total of multiply-imaged sources seen through the core of Abell . This is a substantial improvement over the ground-based tally and signi(cid:12)cantly more than the number known in any other cluster at this time. By analysing these features we can thus hope for the most detailed view of the mass distribution within a cluster thus obtained. The model re(cid:12)nements derived from these new multiply-imaged features are principally in the detailed form of the mass model and lead to little change in the global cluster mass/light ratio. However, they can have an e(cid:11)ect on the lensing inversion and we will explore this further in Section . .. Arclets and Shear Using our previously-de(cid:12)ned catalogue of faint sources ( x.), we now construct a \shear (or deformation) map" de(cid:12)ned as the local average of the deformation vector (see x) of the lensed galaxies: < (cid:28) > (x; y ) = Z Z (cid:28) I (x; y )! (x (cid:0) x; y (cid:0) y )dxdy ; () where ! (x; y ) is a normalized weighting function. The weighting function chosen was a gaussian of arcseconds FWHM. Fig. shows the deformation map within the (cid:12)eld of the WFC upon which we have superimposed the location of some of the most luminous cluster members. This map provides a view of the cluster potential with a resolution of arcsecs ((cid:24) kpc), allowing us to detect any substructure in the cluster mass distribution on scales larger than the resolution. We now use this information to assist in the construction of a re(cid:12)ned model for Abell taking { { into account the new details on the multiple images discussed in x.. It is important to recognise that this map di(cid:11)ers from the true deformation for a number of reasons including contamination by foreground and cluster galaxies and also the dependency of the strength of the image deformation on redshift. The former e(cid:11)ect has already been minimised by removing the brightest galaxies from our list. Furthermore, we can assume that the bulk of the contaminating galaxies are randomly orientated and thus only dilute the modulus of the shear, without a(cid:11)ecting its form. The earlier ground-based mass model was bimodal in form and centred on the cD (# ) and #. The shear map in these regions suggests contributions from # and # should now be included. Although the shear map is statistical in nature, the HST resolution has encouraged us to de(cid:12)ne a visually-selected sample of the brighter and larger arclets, intermediate to the bright arcs reviewed in the previous section. These sources are sheared su(cid:14)ciently that their identi(cid:12)cation as lensed features is in little doubt and furthermore most of them are within spectroscopic reach. Their properties are summarised in Table and Fig. compares their distribution with the \arclets" identi(cid:12)ed from ground-based data (Pell(cid:19)o et al. ). The total number of HST arclets is now signi(cid:12)cantly increased. Furthermore, the HST data suggests that as many as a third of the ground-based arclets are close galaxy pairs or misidenti(cid:12)ed edge-on disk galaxies. In summary, the improved resolution of the repaired HST allows considerable progress to be made in the identi(cid:12)cation and understanding of lensed features in Abell . The resolution of the brighter arcs con(cid:12)rms several of the multiply-imaged features suggested from the ground-based studies. In particular, the fold arc # is now identi(cid:12)ed as a -image con(cid:12)guration, and a number of new multiply-imaged candidates are revealed. Similarly, the HST image allows us to identify weakly-lensed features (arclets) with greater reliability, both on an individual basis and statistically. In both respects, we are better placed to re(cid:12)ne the mass model developed on the basis of ground-based imaging and to identify arclets for redshift determination. { { . Mass Modelling The mass modelling method we use is based on the precepts developed by Kneib ( ) which has now been successfully applied to describe many di(cid:11)erent cluster lenses including MS (Mellier et al. ), A (Kneib et al. ), Cl (Kneib et al. b), Abell (Kneib et al. ) and Cl (Smail et al. b). The basic approach is to use multiply-imaged systems and the mean orientation of the arclets to constrain an analytical representation of the total mass based upon components associated with likely centres of mass, i.e. massive cluster galaxies. Each component is described by a minimal set of parameters: position, ellipticity, orientation, core size and central velocity dispersion. The associated mass distribution should be approximately isothermal if the central mass is relaxed. The particular analytical expression used is based on the pseudo-isothermal elliptical mass distribution (PIEMD) with ellipticity e = (a (cid:0) b)=(a + b) derived by Kassiola & Kovner ( ): (cid:27) rcprc + (cid:26) = Gprc + (cid:26) ; (cid:6)(x; y ) = (cid:6) () with x y (cid:26) = ( + e) + ( (cid:0) e) : () This expression has the advantage of describing mass distributions with arbitrarily large ellipticities. For each component used, we smoothly truncate the elliptical mass distributions (c.f. appendix of Kassiola & Kovner, ) using a linear combination of PIEMD components: qrcut + (cid:26) A ; rcut (cid:0) rc @ (cid:6)(x; y ) = (cid:6) rcrcut prc + (cid:26) (cid:0) () where rcut is the truncation radius (the surface mass density falls as r(cid:0) for r >> rcut ). The total mass of such a truncated mass distribution is (cid:12)nite and for r >> rcut in the limit where e ! : Mtot = (cid:25)(cid:6)rcrcut = (cid:25)G (cid:27) rcut : () The ground-based mass model for Abell (Kneib et al. ) was based on two ma jor components associated with galaxies # and #. As discussed in Section ., the detailed { { information now available from the multiple-images (particularly # and its counter-images) and the (cid:12)ne structure visible in the shear map (Fig. ), encourages us to improve on this model by incorporating the e(cid:11)ect of halos associated with components around # and # and other individual cluster galaxies. For each component the center, ellipticity and orientation are matched to those observed for the associated light distribution (as is the case for those associated with # and #). However, the dynamical parameters rc ; rcut and (cid:27) for these four main components are kept as free parameters. When including galaxy-scale components into our model it is clear that such a re(cid:12)nement could, in principle, be continued inde(cid:12)nitely. In practice, we included all galaxies with R< . (as the magnitude increases the mass of each galaxy become small and their lensing e(cid:11)ects become negligeable). In total, we incorporate halos associated with luminous cluster galaxies into the mass model. For each halo the ellipticity and orientation match those observed for the galaxy light distribution. The other mass parameters are scaled according to the galaxy luminosity following Brainerd, Blandford & Smail ( ). (cid:27) = (cid:27) (cid:3)(L=L(cid:3))= () and rcut = r(cid:3)cut (L=L(cid:3))= () where (cid:27) (cid:3) and r(cid:3)cut are free parameters in the minimization procedure. Furthermore to have a pro(cid:12)le that is identical from one galaxy to another we scale the core radius r in the same way as rcut : r = r(cid:3) (L=L(cid:3))= () The mass of individual galaxy scale as the luminosity with: Mtot = (cid:25)G ((cid:27) (cid:3))r(cid:3)cut (L=L(cid:3)) ( ) It is worth emphasising that, by themselves, the individual galaxy halos do not contain enough mass to reproduce all of the lensed features observed in the cluster. In other words we { { must retain cluster-scale mass components associated with the brighter cluster galaxies (the central cD (# ), #, # and #). To constrain the composite mass model we (cid:12)rst de(cid:12)ne a (cid:31) estimator as the quadratic sum of the di(cid:11)erences between the source parameters (position, orientation and ellipticity) for each set of multiple images (see Table ), plus the observed shear as represented by the quadratic sum of (cid:28)pot < (cid:28)I > sin(((cid:18)pot(cid:0) < (cid:18)I >)). We then minimise this estimator by varying the parameters of the mass model. To stabilise and speed up the convergence we specify the location of the in(cid:12)nite magni(cid:12)cation point in the fold or cusp images (i.e. the location of the symmetry break in the case of # or the luminosity peak of # and the saddle between # and # in the case of the arc # at z=.). The best (cid:12)ducial model resulting from the HST data is presented in Table . A contour plot of the mass distribution is shown in Fig. where the shear-(cid:12)eld is also shown for a source plane at zS = . This mass model is currently the most detailed derived for a cluster core, the detail only being possible because of the combination of the high resolution shear map and the large number of multiply-imaged sources. Although the di(cid:11)erence between the HST and ground-based mass models is small when considering global properties such as cluster mass/light ratio, we show in Section that there can be variations in the lensing inversion for speci(cid:12)c arclets, depending upon their location. The principle change is in the detailed granularity of the mass distribution leading to a more precise inversion. . Gravitational Lensing Formalism We now turn to the primary purpose of the paper, namely to take our well-constrained mass model for Abell and use it to derive statistical redshift distributions for the large sample of faint arclets discussed in x.. In what follows we extend the original discussion of Kneib et al. ( a), developing a formalism for estimating the errors in the inversion redshifts of individual { { galaxies. This will be particularly useful as we have a range of lensed features from relatively bright arclets, many of which can be recognised as lensed on an individual basis, to fainter images which can only be treated statistically... General Equations The gravitational lensing formalism we use is based on the original treatise presented by Kneib et al. ( a). The lens mapping is described by the transformation: ~uS = ~uI (cid:0) D ~r(cid:30)( ~uI ) ; () where ~uS is the position of the source, ~uI is the position of the image, D is the dimensionless ratio DLS =DOS and (cid:30) is the pro jected Newtonian potential normalized by =c. A distant galaxy can be described to the (cid:12)rst order by (cid:12)ve geometrical parameters: its centroid (xc ,yc ), complex deformation (cid:28) = (cid:28) ei(cid:18) and size s. The (cid:12)rst moment of the weighed surface brightness (cid:22)(x; y ) distribution gives the position of the centroid (xc ,yc ): xc = (cid:22)W Z Z W (x; y ) (cid:22)(x; y )xdxdy yc = (cid:22)W Z Z W (x; y ) (cid:22)(x; y )ydxdy ; () with (cid:22)W = Z Z W (x; y ) (cid:22)(x; y )dxdy : () The weighting function W (x; y ) can be adjusted to minimise the error in the determination of the centroid.The second order moment matrix M gives the shape of the galaxy ((cid:28) = (cid:28) ei(cid:18) ), i.e. its equivalent ellipse of ma jor-axis a, minor-axis b and orientation (cid:18): Mxy Myy ! / R(cid:18) a b ! R(cid:0)(cid:18) ; M = (cid:22)W Z Z W (x; y ) (cid:22)(x; y )xixj dxdy = Mxx Mxy () where R(cid:18) is the rotation matrix of angle (cid:18). Note that di(cid:11)erent weighting functions can be chosen in computing the (cid:12)rst and second moment integrals, depending upon which is required with higher { { accuracy. The weighting factor is more critical in dealing with ground-based data than with HST images because of the e(cid:11)ects of seeing (Bonnet & Mellier , Kaiser et al. , Wilson, Cole & Frenk ). In our analysis we used the simple weighting function: W (x; y ) = ( if (cid:22) < (cid:22)I SO () if (cid:22) > (cid:22)I SO The size parameter (s) is de(cid:12)ned as: s = pdet M / ab: () and the deformation matrix D is:D = Mpdet M = (cid:14) + (cid:28)x (cid:14) (cid:0) (cid:28)x ! ; (cid:28)y () (cid:28)y where (cid:28) = (cid:28)x+i(cid:28)y = (cid:28) ei(cid:18) is the complex deformation and (cid:14) = p + (cid:28) is the real distortion parameter. In terms of the ma jor and minor axis these are: (cid:14) = a + b (cid:28) = a (cid:0) b ; : () ab ab Further, the complex shear g and the complex ellipticity " are de(cid:12)ned as: g = a (cid:0) b (cid:14) = + g (cid:28) (cid:3) ; () a + b ; and " = a (cid:0) b " = (cid:28)(cid:14) ; ( ) a + b ; ((cid:3) denotes the conjugate of a complex number). The lensing equation for the moment matrix is given by (Kochanek, ): MS = a(cid:0)MI ta(cid:0) ; () where the subscript S refers to the source, I to the image and a(cid:0) is the inverse of the ampli(cid:12)cation matrix, de(cid:12)ned as the Hessian of the lens mapping (eq. ): (cid:0) (cid:20) (cid:0) (cid:13)x ! : (cid:0) D@yy (cid:30) ! (cid:17) (cid:0) (cid:20) + (cid:13)x a(cid:0) = (cid:0) D@xx (cid:30) (cid:0)D@xy (cid:30) (cid:13)y () (cid:13)y (cid:0)D@xy (cid:30) { { (cid:20) and (cid:13) = (cid:13)x + i(cid:13)y = (cid:13) ei(cid:18)pot are the usual convergence and shear parameters. We denote (cid:13) = D ~(cid:13) and (cid:20) = D ~(cid:20) to separate the distance and mass e(cid:11)ects. (cid:18)pot is the direction of the shear (independent of the redshift of the source) and is de(cid:12)ned as: @xy (cid:30) tan((cid:18)pot ) = @xx(cid:30) (cid:0) @yy (cid:30) : () Equivalently, for the potential we can de(cid:12)ne the parameters gpot , (cid:28) pot and (cid:14)pot : gpot gpot = (cid:13) (cid:0) (cid:20) ; (cid:14) = + gpot(cid:28) (cid:3)pot : () (cid:0) gpotg(cid:3)pot ; (cid:28)pot = For a circular source using this notation, the lens transformation gives: gI = gpot, (cid:28)I = (cid:28)pot , etc. The determinant of eq. gives the lensing transformation of the ob ject's size: sS = j det a(cid:0) j sI : () Dividing eq. by eq. we have the lens equation for the deformation matrix: j det a(cid:0) j a(cid:0) DI ta(cid:0) : DS = () >From eq. , the lens equation for the complex deformation (cid:28) S is also derived: sgn(det a(cid:0) )(cid:28) S = (cid:28) I (cid:0) (cid:28) pot (cid:16)(cid:14)I (cid:0) (cid:28)I <(gI g(cid:3)pot )(cid:17) : () The inverse equation is found by exchanging the subscripts I and S and the signs of (cid:28) pot and g (cid:3)pot. This gives: sgn(det a(cid:0) )(cid:28) I = (cid:28) S + (cid:28) pot (cid:16)(cid:14)S + (cid:28)S <(gS g (cid:3)pot)(cid:17) : () A vectorial representation of eq. is shown in Fig. . The complex deformation of the image is just the vector sum of the intrinsic source shape and the induced deformation from the potential, corrected in the strong lensing regime by a factor (cid:14)S + (cid:28)S <(gS g(cid:3)pot ). In the weak shear regime (det a(cid:0) > ), the correction tends to unity and eq. becomes: () (cid:28) I = (cid:28) S + (cid:28) pot : Using the local shear axes eq. reads: sgn(det a(cid:0) )(cid:28)Sx = (cid:14)pot(cid:28)I x (cid:0) (cid:28)pot(cid:14)I = (cid:14)pot(cid:14)I ("I (cid:0) "pot ) ; ( ) { { sgn(det a(cid:0) )(cid:28)S y = (cid:28)I y : () Note that j(cid:28)y j is a conserved quantity under the lens transformation. .. Distribution in ellipticity and redshift The source ellipticity distribution can be estimated from deep HST images of (cid:12)elds outside rich clusters. A large sample of suitable (cid:12)elds are available in the Medium Deep Survey archive (Gri(cid:14)ths et al. ). Analysis of these (Ebbels et al. ) reveals that the observed distribution of image shapes for brighter galaxies is well (cid:12)tted by the functional form: p((cid:28)Sx; (cid:28)S y ) = (cid:25)(cid:27) (cid:28) exp (cid:0) (cid:28) Sx + (cid:28) S y ! ; () (cid:27) (cid:28) This distribution has a maximum at ((cid:28)x; (cid:28)y ) = (; ) and is also radially symmetric (because of the random orientations of unlensed (cid:12)eld galaxies). We stress however that the form of this distribution does depend strongly upon the size of the galaxies and their magnitudes (Ebbels et al. ). Since j(cid:28)y j is conserved by lensing, in the frame of the local shear, we have the conditional probabilities: p((cid:28)Sx ; (cid:28)S y ) = p((cid:28)Sx ; (cid:28)I y ) = p((cid:14)pot(zS )(cid:28)I x (cid:0) (cid:28)pot (zS )(cid:14)I ; (cid:28)I y ) = p(z jI ; mass)p(cid:28)Sy ((cid:28)S y ) : () In other words, the conditional redshift probability (given the image shape and the mass model) is simply the source shape probability divided by that of (cid:28)S y . From eq. : p(cid:25)(cid:27) (cid:28) exp (cid:0) ((cid:14)pot (zS )(cid:28)I x (cid:0) (cid:28)pot (zS )(cid:14)I ) ! : p(z jI ; mass) = p((cid:28)Sx ; (cid:28)S y ) p(cid:28)Sy ((cid:28)S y ) = () (cid:27) (cid:28) which reproduces the intuitive prescription of Kneib et al. ( a) that the maximum of the redshift probability function for a given image corresponds to the minimum deformation of the source.When the image is outside the critical line, (cid:28)pot is an increasing function of redshift { with positive (cid:28)I x if the orientation is within deg of the shear direction and negative otherwise. If { { (cid:28)I x is positive but not too large, p(z jI ; mass) has a maximum for "I x = "pot (zS ) and the most probable redshift is (cid:12)nite. However, when (cid:28)I x is too large, p(z jI ; mass) is an increasing function of redshift leading to a most probable redshift, z = . If (cid:28)I x is negative then p(z jI ; mass) is a decreasing function of redshift, yielding a most probable redshift, z = zlens (see Fig. ). In the latter two cases no \sensible" estimate of the redshift of the galaxy can be derived. .. Uncertainties in the redshift determination We now discuss the uncertainties that arise when determining faint galaxy redshifts with a gravitational telescope. There are three sources of error: those arising from image shape (errors in the deformation (cid:28) I ), the lens mass model (errors in (cid:20), (cid:13) and (cid:18)pot ) and statistical errors introduced by the contamination of the arclet sample by foreground or cluster galaxies. The (cid:12)rst two errors are concerned with individual arclets, while the third a(cid:11)ects the properties of the sample as a whole. ... Individual errors We begin by considering the relative error in z . Di(cid:11)erentiating gpot = D ~(cid:13)=( (cid:0) D ~(cid:20)), we have: (z (cid:0) zL )D z (cid:0) zL = dDD = ( (cid:0) D ~(cid:20)) dgpot gpot (cid:0) d~(cid:13)~(cid:13) (cid:0) Dd~(cid:20) : dz () D The term D=(z (cid:0) zL )D is almost proportional to (z (cid:0) zL ), indicating that the accuracy of the lensing-inferred redshifts is lower at large redshift (see Fig. ). Moreover, for the maximum of redshift probability function: "pot = (cid:14)pot d"I x"I x = (cid:14)pot (cid:18) d"I"I (cid:0) tan((cid:18)I )d(cid:18)I (cid:19) ; gpot = (cid:14)pot d"pot dgpot () and thus the total error in the estimate of the most probable redshift is: dDD = ( (cid:0) D ~(cid:20))(cid:14)pot ( d"I"I (cid:0) tan((cid:18)I )d(cid:18)I ) (cid:0) d~(cid:13)~(cid:13) (cid:0) Dd~(cid:20) : () { { We now turn to the likely uncertainties in measured image ellipticities "I and position angles (cid:18)I . The former has the following e(cid:11)ect:dDD = ( (cid:0) D ~(cid:20))(cid:14)pot d"I"I : () An overestimate of "I leads (in the sub-critical part of the lens) to an over-estimated redshift. If the image is close to a critical line then a small error in "I produces a large error in z since (cid:14)pot diverges. However for the bulk of the arclets this is not a problem as we are not in the multiple image regions and ( (cid:0) D ~(cid:20))(cid:14)pot is in general less than (as (cid:14)pot (cid:24) and ( (cid:0) D ~(cid:20)) < ). For faint images there is a tendency to under-estimate the image ellipticity at large ellipticity and over-estimate the ellipticity at small ellipticity, although these e(cid:11)ects can be statistically corrected. However for small ellipticities and compact ob jects it is di(cid:14)cult to determine the true image ellipticity.Errors in the measured orientation (cid:18)I : dDD = (cid:0)( (cid:0) D ~(cid:20))(cid:14)pot tan((cid:18)I )d(cid:18)I : () have the same dependence on (cid:14)pot as the ellipticity. However, as the orientation is usually the best measured characteristic of an image and because the error is symmetrically distributed, the bias is less serious than for the ellipticities. Nevertheless, when (cid:18)I (cid:24) (cid:25)= ("I x (cid:24) ) the errors can become very large. Finally, the errors in the cluster mass model, in ~(cid:20): dDD = (cid:0)Dd~(cid:20) = (cid:0) d(cid:6)(cid:6)crit ; ( ) and the error in ~(cid:13) : dDD = (cid:0) d~(cid:13)~(cid:13) : () demonstrate that an over-estimated local mass and shear lead to an under-estimated redshift, with the dependence between the two being reasonably well-behaved. However, adding galaxy-size { { components in the lens-model can dramatically change the intensity of the shear near a critical area of the lens, therefore it is important to take these components into account. An advantage of the Hubble Space Telescope is the stability of the high resolution imaging, this minimises problems which plague ground-based studies of faint ob ject shapes (seeing, tracking, (cid:12)eld astigmatism, and their time variability). While the HST capabilities are an order of magnitude better than the ground-based facilities, the limiting factors for accurate measurement of the shapes of faint and compact galaxies now become photon noise and pixel-sampling e(cid:11)ects. A key point in determining reliable redshifts is the absolute calibration of the mass model. This is best addressed using a number of spectroscopically-con(cid:12)rmed lensed features in the cluster, while the morphology of the mass can be best determined using the geometry of any multiply-imaged sources present (Mellier et al. , Kneib et al. , Smail et al. c). For spectroscopic arcs, Abell is one of the best clusters for our purposes since Pello et al. ( ) have secured accurate redshifts for two of the giant arcs in the cluster core. Similarly, the presence of at least multiply-imaged sources in Abell , identi(cid:12)ed using HST, means that we can strongly constrain not only the absolute mass in the cluster core, but also the detailed form of its distribution. We can thus expect that remaining uncertainties in the mass distribution will predominantly arise from unresolved granularity on scales (cid:20) kpc not attached to any galaxy. The fact that we can make such a statement attests to the detailed view of the cluster mass provided by lensing. ... Sample selection contaminations The (cid:12)nal uncertainty we must consider arises from contamination of the arclet catalog by foreground galaxies and, in particular, cluster members. Indeed, considering only the number of galaxies detected within the WFPC (cid:12)eld and comparing this to deep (cid:12)eld counts (Smail et al. d), (cid:24) galaxies per magnitude are cluster members down to R(cid:24). (Fig. ). This contamination is stronger in the center of the cluster than in the outer parts as the surface density { { of galaxies within a cluster falls faster than =r. If the contaminating galaxies are randomly orientated, the shear will be reduced below the true value and hence we obtain an arti(cid:12)cially reduction of the mean redshift of the background population. In the absence of a reliable distance separation on the basis of arclet colors, we have developed a statistical method to estimate the unlensed contamination. Lensing displaces the ellipticity distribution of faint sources from that observed for blank (cid:12)elds (or unlensed sources) which should be centred on the null ellipticity; this is illustrated schematically in Fig. . As discussed in x., redshifts can only be estimated for images with orientations within deg of the predicted shear direction (i.e. arclets with (cid:28)I x > ). Images with (cid:28)I x < must either be cluster members, foreground galaxies or, conceivably, lensed background ob jects which are insu(cid:14)ciently deformed to move them into the (cid:28)I x > region. The number of images with (cid:28)I x < therefore provides an upper limit on contamination by unlensed galaxies and an improved estimate can be determined by considering those lying within the bulk of the ellipticity distribution ((cid:28)I < (cid:27)(cid:28) and (cid:28)I x < ). By applying a (cid:25)= rotation prior to inversion, we can also obtain an estimate of the contamination as a function of redshift and directly subtract this spurious N (z ) from that derived for the total distribution. Although this only provides a statistical correction for contamination, it gives a good indication of the stability of the derived N (z ). . Determining the Field Redshift Distribution to R '. We now use the photometric catalog of faint arclet candidates discussed in x, together with the lensing inversion method presented in x, to derive the likely redshift distribution N (z ) of faint background galaxies viewed through the center of Abell . In order to quantify the errors in our determination of N (z ) we must (cid:12)rst estimate uncertainties in the shape measurements of individual arclets as a function of their size and apparent magnitude. This is important in determining the useful limit of our HST image for { { accurate inversion. To do this we simulated (cid:24) images of di(cid:11)erent known sizes and ellipticities and then reproduced the detection characteristics applicable to our HST image. By comparing the actual galaxy catalog to its simulated equivalent, the dispersion in the realised shape and orientation can be examined as a function of apparent magnitude (Fig. ). The formalism of x then gives, for each image, the likely redshift error arising from these observational uncertainties. The simulations are very helpful in revealing two important limitations that apply in deriving redshift distributions from lensing data: Firstly, we (cid:12)nd the redshift error does not track the measured apparent magnitude very well for a realistic distribution of image properties, but depends more closely on the intrinsic shape and signal/noise of each image. Clearly the most interesting region for consideration is that which lies beyond the current spectroscopic limit, viz. R >. In the context of our relatively short HST exposure of Abell , Fig. d shows that the uncertainty in the measurement of ellipticities increases signi(cid:12)cant beyond R= (but strongly depend on the size and the ellipticity of the ob jects) and thus inversion becomes highly uncertain. Although we can correct for this e(cid:11)ect statistical ly (see x.., Fig. ), clearly the uncertainty in this correction could swamp the signal from those sources for which reliable inversion is possible. Secondly, even with adequate signal/noise for all images, (cid:1)z depends on z itself (Fig. ). A single cluster lens can thus only usefully constrain the number of sources lying in a speci(cid:12)c redshift range (.< z <. for Abell ) although some information is available on the overall N (z ) as well.The (cid:12)rst limitation is more serious as it emphasises that those samples for which lensing-induced redshift distributions can be reliably determined are unlikely to be strictly magnitude-limited as has been the case traditionally for ground-based spectroscopic surveys. Notwithstanding the contamination from sources which are not amenable to inversion, a magnitude-limited arclet sample would never produce a magnitude-limited source sample because of the variable magni(cid:12)cations. However, the fact that little can be said about a subset of faint { { sources is a more serious di(cid:14)culty when comparing with current model predictions which are largely based on integrated magnitudes. Either it must be assumed that the compact sources are a representative subset of those for which inversion is practical, or evolutionary models must take into account the e(cid:11)ect of an areal threshold rather than an integrated magnitude. Conceivably with much longer integrations, the signal/noise of each faint image will improve su(cid:14)ciently to reduce the uncertainties. As the source surface brightness and k-corrections depend strongly on redshift, the visibility of a faint source is also a complex function of redshift and type. Although this is true of any isophotally-selected faint galaxy sample and is not further distorted by the lensing process, as the arclet population presumably probes to much higher redshift than the brighter spectroscopic samples, the uncertainties in allowing for visibility losses are presumably much greater. A speci(cid:12)c problem, raised originally by Smail et al. ( ), is the possibility that only dense star-forming regions have su(cid:14)cient ultraviolet (cid:13)ux and high enough surface brightness to produce arclets visible with HST.We now illustrate the above e(cid:11)ects in the context of the actual Abell catalogue. To R ', we have candidate arclets and for each of these, our procedure delivers a likelihood distribution for the true, unlensed apparent magnitude Rsource and the redshift z . We can apply the contamination correction discussed in x.. to determine the mean redshift of those sources with z > zcl and this can be compared with various predictions. This method is illustrated on the Rsource {z plane in Figure together with the no evolution prediction for an R-limited sample following the procedure described by Ellis ( ). The latter prediction is based on type-dependent bJ luminosity functions and morphological proportions observed for the local (cid:12)eld population (Loveday et al. ) transformed to the R-band using Hubble-sequence colours with k-corrections taken from King & Ellis ( ). The results are also summarised in Table . For R < there are too few arclets in our catalogue for meaningful results, but for < R < the results indicate a gradual increase in mean redshift with apparent magnitude (Fig. dashed-line). The mean redshift of the arclet population is reasonably close to the no { { evolution expectations to R '. However, upon examination of the individual redshifts, there appears to be an excess of low redshift arclets whose proportion is independent of magnitude and whose origin could explain the trend towards low mean redshifts for faint arclets found earlier by Smail et al. ( b) and Kneib et al. ( a). It is now clear, following the discussion above, that this e(cid:11)ect arises because a fraction of the images have insu(cid:14)cient shear to be correctly inverted and the residual uncertainties in the correction illustrated in Fig. can a(cid:11)ect the results at the level where interesting scienti(cid:12)c conclusions are required. We can quantify this e(cid:11)ect by restricting the technique to those images whose isophotal areas exceed pixels and ellipticity is larger than .. As Fig. shows (dotted-dashed line), this leads to an increase in the mean redshift at all magnitudes and the large ma jority of the `low-z' points disappear. Out of a total sample of well-de(cid:12)ned arclets to R'., only two are beyond z ' and the mean redshift at R ' is ' i.e. only slightly above the no evolution prediction. Thus, unless the smaller arclets represent an entirely di(cid:11)erent population of sources or the intrinsic size of a source is a strong function of redshift beyond ', the absence of a large number of very distant luminous sources to R ' is a secure result. It is important to recognise that, for a lensing cluster at z=., Fig. b shows the mean error in inverted redshift is high even for a well-de(cid:12)ned arclet. Typically, for the arclets amenable to individual inversion, (cid:1)(cid:15)=(cid:15) '.-. and thus, from Fig. b, a source at z ' could be placed anywhere from < z <. A large sample size obviates the need for more precise inversion but we also note that the redshift distribution would be veri(cid:12)ed via inversion through a well-constrained cluster at higher redshift. An arclet sample viewed through a cluster at z '. would reduce the implied redshift error for a source at z ' by a factor of . It may also be possible to verify the brighter arclets spectroscopically and this will clearly lead to further improvements. Such con(cid:12)rmation can be made more e(cid:11)ective by selecting the bluest cases with predicted redshifts z (cid:20) : where strong emission lines would lie in the range of optical and near-infrared spectrographs. A subset of well-distributed arclets would represent a valid test of our inversion since this depends on geometrical quantities and the cluster mass model, { { both of which are independent of the photometric properties of the background sources. As an encouragement for interested workers, we therefore list in Table the inverted redshifts for each of the ma jor arcs and multiple images discussed in x. and those remaining arcs for which reliable inversion is possible plotted on Fig. . Finally, we turn to the e(cid:11)ect on the inversion of our improved HST-based mass model compared to the earlier ground-based equivalent of Kneib et al. ( ). In Table we show the mean inverted redshift after statistical correction for contamination for the ground-based (`old') and HST-based (`new`) mass models. In both cases, the di(cid:11)erences are very minor and illustrate that the principal uncertainty in inversion through Abell is no longer the global mass model for the cluster. Although inversion through well-constrained lenses is an extremely promising prospect, this pilot study has shown that the ma jor observational limitation is the signal/noise of the required shape parameters for the faint sources. This demonstrates the importance of securing deeper HST exposures. A second revelation is the importance of developing a new approach in the construction of model predictions. It seems unlikely that such faint sources can easily be constructed into apparent magnitude-limited samples and thus much work is needed to produce surface brightness limited predictions. Notwithstanding these di(cid:14)culties, Abell remains an exceptionally promising cosmic lens and the opportunities for verifying or otherwise the predicted redshifts for the brighter arclets are excellent. Such data will improve the mass model and lead to even tighter constraints on the redshifts of sources beyond reach of ground-based spectrographs. . Conclusions . This paper is the (cid:12)rst attempt to constrain the redshift distribution of very faint galaxies by using the HST to study images of sources which have been lensed by a massive foreground cluster. Using multiple images and newly-discovered lensing features in the rich cluster Abell , we have constructed a precise mass distribution which is more tightly constrained { { that for any other cluster. With HST high-resolution data we have now su(cid:14)cient information to constrain not only the mass pro(cid:12)le of the cluster but also to give limits on the masses of individual cluster galaxies. . Using this mass model and a new formalism we develop based on the observed image parameters of faint sources, we demonstrate how it is possible to deduce the redshift distribution of very faint galaxies viewed through the cluster as well as to account statistically for contamination by unlensed sources and in understanding the various uncertainties. First results are presented for a large sample of arclets to R '-., (cid:24) magnitudes fainter than results from ground-based spectroscopy. . Several limitations arise in the interpretation of our inverted redshifts when comparison is made with evolutionary models. These limitations may help to explain earlier results which have tended to yield arclet redshifts somewhat less than extrapolation of ground-based spectroscopic data would imply. Even with the high resolution of the HST, it is di(cid:14)cult in short integrations to measure faint galaxy shapes adequately to invert a magnitude-limited It therefore appears more practical to invert area-limited samples and we sample. demonstrate that more reliable results are obtained using such a subset. . We demonstrate that, notwithstanding the uncertainties and sample selection criteria we have adopted, the absence of a large number of very distant sources (z > ) in our inverted redshift distributions is a robust result. At R ', the mean redshift for samples corrected for contamination or those based on individual arclets of high signal/noise is only '.-.. . The brighter arclets, whose redshifts are estimated via our technique, are amenable to direct spectroscopic examination. Such con(cid:12)rmation can be made more e(cid:11)ective by selecting the bluest cases with predicted redshifts z (cid:20) : where strong emission lines would lie in the range of optical and near-infrared spectrographs. Note that con(cid:12)rmation of a carefully-selected subset of well-distributed arclets would still represent a valid test of our inversion technique. The lensing inversion depends only on geometrical quantities and the cluster mass model, both of which are independent of the photometric properties of the background sources. { { We thank Bob Williams and Ray Lucas and other STScI sta(cid:11) for their assistance with the rapid processing of this data. We acknowledge enthusiastic support from a number of colleagues including Roger Blandford, Bernard Fort, Yannick Mellier, Jerry Ostriker, Roser Pell(cid:19)o, Peter Schneider and Martin Rees. This paper is based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc. JPK gratefully acknowledges support from an EC Fellowship and IRS from NATO and Carnegie Fellowships. WJC acknowledges support from the Australian Department of Industry, Science and Technology, the Australian Research Council and Sun Microsystems. { { B-r(cid:3) Multiple images R (FW) (cid:22)mean z .+:(cid:0): . / . / . . / . ./././. ./././. /// ././. /. . . . . . . . /./ . (. ) . /./. .(cid:6): .(cid:6): (cid:24). H-- (cid:24). .(cid:6): (cid:24). H- (cid:24). .(cid:6): ./. . / . / . / H (cid:3) from Leborgne et al. ( ) when available, typical errors for red ob jects can be as high as . mag (Kneib et al. ). Table : List of con(cid:12)rmed and candidate multiple images from our HST study, along with their ground-based colors and measured or predicted redshifts. { { z+ Comments zphoto z- zopt (cid:22)R Rcor # id (cid:3) .-. disk galaxy . . (cid:3) . .-. . . compact + disk galaxies . . . disk galaxy .-. . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . (cid:3) .-. compact galaxies . . .-. . . (cid:3) . . . .-. . . (cid:3) .-. extended galaxies . . . . . . .-. . . . . (cid:3) . . . .-. . . . .-. . . . . . .-. . . . . . .-. . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . .-. . . .-. . . . counter-image of . . . . . . -. . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . cusp arc, disk of ? H,, (cid:24). (cid:24). . . . fold arc H, (cid:24). (cid:24). . counter-image of . . . counter-image of . . . counter-image of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table : The catalog of candidate arclets from our HST/WFPC image. Ob jects with zphoto represent candidate arclets from Pello et al. ( ) which lie within the HST/WFPC (cid:12)eld. Ob jects denoted (cid:3) are either misidenti(cid:12)cations (edge-on galaxy or a close pair) or ob jects suspected not to be lensed when comparison is made with the shear orientation. { { (cid:18) Cluster-Size xc yc a/b rc (cid:27) rcut degree (kpc) Component (arcsec) (arcsec) (km/s) (kpc) -. # . . . . . . . # -. -. . . . . . # -. - . . . . . . . . . # . -. . M/LV rcut rc Galaxy-Size Mtot (cid:27) M(cid:12) M(cid:12) /L(cid:12) (kpc) (km/s) (kpc) Component for M(cid:3)V =-. . . . . . Table : Characteristics of the various components in the improved mass model of Abell . Positions and orientations are de(cid:12)ned on the WFPC- image (Fig. a) with the position angle (cid:18) increasing anti-clockwise from the X-axis. arclet Ncorrarclet < z >old < z >new < z >nocorr < z >N E N total R new - . . . . - . . . . - . . . . Table : Inversion results using all arclets: < z >N E represents the mean expected for arclet is the total number in each subsample, Ncorrarclet is that no luminosity evolution. N total after correction for contamination by unlensed images. < z >old and < z >new represent, respectively, the mean arclet redshift using the ground-based (Kneib et al. ) and HST- based mass models. For the HST model, < z >nocorr indicates the mean redshift prior to new contamination correction. { { REFERENCES Bertin, E., Sextractor Manual . Bertin, E., Arnouts, S., , preprint Birkinshaw, M., Hughes, J.P., , ApJ, , . Bonnet, H., Mellier, Y., , A&A, in press. Brainerd, T., Blandford, R., Smail, I., , preprint SISSA/astro-ph . Ebbels, T., et al. , in preparation. Ellis, R.S., , in Unsolved Problems in Astrophysics, eds Bahcall, J. & Ostriker, J., Princeton, in press. Fort, B., Mellier, Y., , Astron. Astr. Rev., , . Jones, M., Saunders, R., Alexander, P., Birkinshaw, M., Dilon, N., Grainge, K., Hancock, S., Lasenby, A., Lefevre, D., Pooley, G., , Nature, , . Gri(cid:14)ths, R.E., Casertano, S., Ratnatunga, K.U., Neuchaefer,L.W., Ellis, R.S., Gilmore, G., Glazebrook, K., Santiago, B., Elson, R.A.W., Huchra, J.P., Windhorst, R.A., Pascarelle, S.M., Green, R.F., Illingworth, G.D., Koo, D.C. & Tyson, A.J., , ApJ, , L Holtzman, J.A., Burrows, C.J. , Casterno, S., Hester, J.J., Trauger, J.T., Watson, A.M., Worthey, G., , preprint. Kassiola, A., Kovner, I., , ApJ, , . Kaiser, N., Squires, G., Broadhurst, T. , ApJ, in press. , preprint. King, C.R. & Ellis, R.S., ApJ, , . Kneib, J.-P., , PhD. Thesis, Universit(cid:19)e Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France Kneib, J.-P., Mellier, Y., Fort, B., Mathez, G., , A&A, , . { { Kneib, J.-P., Mellier, Y., Fort, B., Soucail, G., Longaretti, P.Y., a, A&A, , . Kneib, J.-P., Melnick, J., Gopal-Krishna, b, A&A, , L. Kneib, J.-P., Mellier, Y., Pell(cid:19)o, R., Miralda-Escud(cid:19)e, J., Le Borgne, J.-F., B(cid:127)ohringer, H., Picat, J.-P., , A&A, in press. Kochanek, C.S., , MNRAS, , . Le Borgne, J.-F., Pell(cid:19)o, R. & Sanahuja, B., , A&AS, , . Loveday, J., Peterson, B. A., Efstathiou, G., Maddox, S.J. , ApJ, , L. Mellier, Y., Fort, B., Kneib, J.-P., , ApJ, , . Pell(cid:19)o, R., Soucail, G., Sanahuja, B., Mathez, G., Ojero, E., , A&A, , L. Pell(cid:19)o, R., Le Borgne, J.-F., Sanahuja, B., Mathez, G., Fort, B., , A&A, , . Smail, I., Ellis, R.S., Fitchett, M. J., Norgaard-Nielsen, H.U., Hansen, L., Jorgensen, H.E. , MNRAS, , . Smail, I., Couch, W.J., Ellis, R.S., Sharples, R.M., a, ApJ, , . Smail, I., Dressler, A., Kneib, J.-P., Ellis, R.S., Couch, W.J., Sharples, R.M., Oemler, A., b, ApJ, in press. Smail, I., Hogg, D.W., Blandford, R., Cohen, J.G., Edge, A.C., Djorgovski, S.G. c, MNRAS, in press. Smail, I., Hogg, D.W., Yan, L., Cohen, J., d, ApJ, , . Wilson, G., Cole, S. & Frenk, C.S., , MNRAS, submitted This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v.. { { Fig. . (a) The full (cid:12)eld of our FW WFPC- exposure of Abell (z = :). (b) Central portion showing that several multiply-imaged sources, numbered according to the scheme of Le Borgne et al. ( ), are con(cid:12)rmed by virtue of their mirrored morphological features (see text for details). Fig. . Di(cid:11)erential galaxy counts within the Abell WFC image (. arcmin). The dashed line de(cid:12)nes our estimated completeness limit at the % level. The dotted line indicates (cid:12)eld counts in R from Smail et al. ( d). The dotted-dashed line is the cluster galaxies counts estimated by subtracting the (cid:12)eld counts from the observed counts. Fig. . The distribution of (cid:24) arclet candidates with < R < selected from the HST image (thin lines) compared to those in the ground-based analysis of Pell(cid:19)o et al. ( ) (thick lines). The shear (cid:12)eld based on the HST sample illustrates the need for further mass components associated with the brighter cluster galaxies. Fig. . Shear map for the cluster center derived from the orientations and ellipticities of the HST arclets. The most signi(cid:12)cant mass components are indicated. The new mass model extends that of Kneib et al. ( ) by including ma jor mass components associated with galaxies # and # (see Table ) as well as smaller halos around luminous cluster members (see text for details). At the cluster redshift arcsec is equivalent to . kpc. Fig. . Contour map for the adopted mass distribution and the shear map implied for a source plane at zS = . Countours correspond from the lowest to the highest to a density of ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., . and . M(cid:12) kpc(cid:0) . At the cluster redshift arcsec is equivalent to . kpc. Fig. . Lens deformation diagram (see text for de(cid:12)nition of quantities). { { Fig. . Redshift probability distribution for (cid:28)I x > (full and dashed line) and (cid:28)I x < (dotted line) { see text for details. Fig. . (a) D parameter versus source redshift for cluster lenses at z = : and z = :. The solid line is for (cid:10) = and the dashed line for (cid:10) = :. (b), D=[(z (cid:0) zL )D ] versus source redshift illustrating the higher the source redshift, the greater the uncertainty in the inverted redshift. Note that the redshift of a distant source is more accurately derived using a high redshift lens. Fig. . Ellipticity distribution showing that observed is the sum of the lensed and unlensed galaxies vectors. Fig. . Simulated errors for image parameters relevant to lensing inversion as function of apparent magnitude: (a) dispersion on the ellipticity (cid:27)" , (b) dispersion on the orientation (cid:27)(cid:18) , (c) relative error (cid:27)"="mes and (d) relative error ("true (cid:0) "mes )="mes . Each data point was determined from realisations of the same source., a dot denotes galaxies with small ellipticities ((cid:15) < :), (*) denotes galaxies whose isophotal area < pixels, and (+) denotes galaxies with intrinsic large ellipticities ((cid:15) > :) and large isophotal area > pixels. Fig. . Mean redshift vs. intrinsic magnitude for various arclet samples. The solid line represents the no-evolution prediction according to assumptions detailed in the text. The dashed line represents the results for all arclet candidates after making a statistical correction for foreground and cluster contamination. The dotted-dashed line is the same sample after excluding images whose isophotal areas are smaller than pixels. Squares represent the individual inverted redshifts of all arclets greater than pixels in area. Solid symbols denote those with (cid:15) > : and open symbols those with (cid:15) < :. { { Figure a { { Figure b - Plate { { Figure { { Figure { { Figure { { Figure { { Figure pot τ I τ Sτ 2θ s 2θ I corrective term { { Figure { { Figure a Figure b { { Iyτ Figure "unlensed" "lensed" Ixτ { { Figure { { Figure
astro-ph/9507096	1	9507	1995-07-24T18:56:47	The theoretical calculation of the Rossby number and the `non-local' convective overturn time for pre-main sequence and early post-main sequence stars	[ "astro-ph" ]	This paper provides estimates of convective turnover time scales for Sun-like stars in the pre-main sequence and early post-main sequence phases of evolution, based on up-to-date physical input for the stellar models. In this first study, all models have solar abundances, which is typical of the stars in the Galactic disk where most of the available data have been collected. A new feature of these models is the inclusion of rotation in the evolutionary sequences, thus making it possible to derive theoretically the Rossby number for each star along its evolutionary track, based on its calculated rotation rate and its local convective turnover time near the base of the convection zone. Global turnover times are also calculated for the complete convection zone. This information should make possible a new class of observational tests of stellar theory which were previously impossible with semi-empirical models, particularly in the study of stellar activity and in research related to angular momentum transfer in stellar interiors during the course of stellar evolution.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Ap. J. ms. number 32821, accepted The theoretical calculation of the Rossby number and the ‘non-local’ convective overturn time for pre-main sequence and early post-main sequence stars Yong -Cheol Kim and Pierre Demarque Department of Astronomy, and Center for Solar and Space Research Yale University, Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101 E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper provides estimates of convective turnover time scales for Sun-like stars in the pre-main sequence and early post-main sequence phases of evolution, based on up-to-date physical input for the stellar models. In this first study, all models have solar abundances, which is typical of the stars in the Galactic disk where most of the available data have been collected. A new feature of these models is the inclusion of rotation in the evolutionary sequences, thus making it possible to derive theoretically the Rossby number for each star along its evolutionary track, based on its calculated rotation rate and its local convective turnover time near the base of the convection zone. Global turnover times are also calculated for the complete convection zone. This information should make possible a new class of observational tests of stellar theory which were previously impossible with semi-empirical models, particularly in the study of stellar activity and in research related to angular momentum transfer in stellar interiors during the course of stellar evolution. Subject headings: general – stars: interiors – stars: evolution 5 9 9 1 l u J 4 2 1 v 6 9 0 7 0 5 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a – 2 – 1. Introduction There is a rapidly growing body of observations relating to the study of solar-stellar phenomena which will lead to a better understanding of the internal dynamics of the pre-main sequence and early post-main sequence evolutionary phases of stars like the Sun. But before this wealth of data can be fully understood, the role of the convection zone structure, its depth and overturn time scale, and its interaction with rotation need to be clarified. This is of importance for understanding not only the mechanism of angular momentum transfer in stars, but also the evolution of rotating stars, both in the pre main-sequence and post main-sequence phases. The interaction of rotation with convection is now widely believed to be responsible for the generation of stellar dynamos and the observed stellar magnetic activity and activity cycles. Durney and Latour (1978) (see also Durney, Mihalas and Robinson 1981, and Durney and Robinson 1982) made an important step forward in relating the principles of mean-field dynamo theory to the observations. They showed that if a stellar dynamo is responsible for the observed stellar activity, there should be a relation between magnetic activity and the characteristics of rotating stellar convection zones. With the help of dimensional arguments, they pointed out the significance of the Rossby number (proportional to the ratio of the rotation period to the convective turnover time) in the dynamo mechanism. Since in the dynamo model, the dynamo action is believed to take place at the base of the convection zone, anchored in the radiative layers just below the convective interface, the convective turnover time of the deepest part of the convection zone is the most relevant in the evaluation of the Rossby number. Soon afterwards, the availability of precise rotation periods for magnetically active stars (Baliunas et al. 1983) made it possible to test this hypothesis in a semi-empirical way by combining convective turnover times derived from model convection zones, such as the models of Gilman (1980), with the observed rotation periods (Noyes 1983). This was done by a number of researchers (Mangeney and Praderie 1984; Hartmann et al. 1984; Noyes et al. 1984) for stars near the main sequence and for pre-main sequence stars (Simon et al. 1985). Since then a large number of studies have been performed correlating different types of magnetic activity indices to such semi-empirically derived Rossby numbers and to other parameters such as the stellar rotation rate (Basri 1987; Shrijver and Rutten 1987; Simon and Fekel 1987; Dobson and Radick 1989). The pattern of convective velocities as a function of effective temperature and age derived from stellar models, which serve as input in Rossby number calculations, depend sensitively on the particulars of the stellar interior models, either input parameters such as chemical composition, or mass, or physics input such as opacities or the equation of state used. In addition, because of the well-known non-linearity of the equation of stellar structure, it is unadvisable to construct stellar envelope models by simple inward integration without applying the interior boundary conditions, as the early calculations frequently did; fully consistent interior models are needed. An important step in relating activity observations to self consistent stellar evolutionary tracks and the predicted evolutionary changes in convective overturn times was made by Gilliland (1985, 1986). Other calculations of Rossby numbers, based on complete main sequence stellar models, have also been – 3 – published by Rucinski and VandenBerg (1986, 1990). Since then, rapid progress has been made in our knowledge of stellar opacities and equation of state (see e.g. Rogers and Iglesias 1994), and much improved models of the Sun and Sun-like stars can be constructed (Guenther et al 1992; Chaboyer et al. 1995; Guenther, Kim and Demarque 1995). The theory of rotating stellar evolution has also advanced. The work of Endal and Sofia (1978, 1981), which included the spin-down due to a stellar wind, and introduced into stellar evolution the effects of various rotationally induced mixing processes acting on different time scales, thus relating angular moment transfer to internal mixing, opened up new ways of confronting theory and observation (Pinsonneault et al. 1989, 1990; Chaboyer et al. 1995). The purpose of this paper is to provide estimates of turnover time scales for Sun-like stars in the pre-main-sequence and early post main-sequence phases of evolution, based on up-to-date physical input for the stellar models. In this first study, all models have solar abundances, which are typical stars in the Galactic disk. Another new feature of these models is the inclusion of rotation. Because the evolution of internal rotation has been included in the models, it is possible to derive theoretically the Rossby number for each star along its evolutionary track based on the theoretical estimates for both the convective turnover time and the rotation rate of the convection zone. These internally self consistent models should make possible a new class of observational tests of stellar theory which were impossible with semi-empirical models. We describe convection by the mixing-length formalism in the usual way. While it is known that the convective velocities near the stellar surface are not well described by the mixing-length approximation (Kim et al. 1995a,b), the convective turnover time scales calculated here are dominated by the conditions near the base of the convection zone, where the temperature gradient is for all practical purposes adiabatic, and the mixing-length approximation is known to provide an adequate description of convection, at least in an average sense (Chan and Sofia 1989; Lydon et al. 1992). For this reason, the Rossby number estimates should be little affected (sub ject to a constant scale factor) by improvements in our understanding of convection. We emphasize, however, that for many other purposes, such as describing the outer layers where radiation plays a dominant role, the mixing length approximation is inadequate, and more refined convection models that take into consideration the interplay between convection and radiation, are needed (Kim et al. 1995a,b). This conclusion applies in particular for understanding the structure of the transition superadiabatic layer at the top of the convection zone. It is also likely to apply for understanding the behavior of magnetic fields, the details of the generation of acoustic noise in stellar chromospheres, and the driving of p-modes in Sun-like stars. Section 2 describes the series of stellar models with masses ranging from 0.5M⊙ to 1.2M⊙ which were evolved from the fully convective pre-main-sequence Hayashi phase to the sub-giant phase. The calculation of the convective turnover time and of the Rossby number and their evolution as a function of time are considered in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. Finally, we briefly discuss the results in section 5. – 4 – 2. Calculations 2.1. Stellar models A series of stellar models with masses ranging from 0.5 to 1.2M⊙ (in 0.1M⊙ increments), have been evolved from a fully convective pre-main sequence model to the sub-giant phase. The OPAL opacities tables (Iglesias and Rogers 1991), constructed for the solar mixture of Anders and Grevesse(1989) were used, together with the Kurucz (1991) low temperature opacities. The Kurucz (1992) model atmospheres served as surface boundary conditions. The numerical tolerances and input physics were identical for all evolutionary runs, and similar to those adopted by Chaboyer et al. (1995). All models used the parameters derived for the standard solar model, where the initial X , Z , and the mixing length ratio α are varied until a solar model at the solar age of 4.55Gyr (Guenther 1989) has the observed solar values of luminosity, radius, and Z/X . In addition, the solar surface rotational velocity and 7Li depletion were used to calibrate the rotation and diffusion parameters of all evolutionary sequences, as described in sections 2.2 and 2.3 below. The solar model in this calibration matches the solar radius and luminosity to within 0.01%, while the surface Z/X matches the observed value to within 1.0%. The model also reproduced the observed solar rotation rate and Li depletion to within 1.5%. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the models and their input parameters. Figure 1 shows the evolutionary tracks in the H-R diagram. For the internal rotation rates considered here, rotation has a negligible effect on both the rate of evolution and the path of the evolutionary track in the H-R diagram (Pinsonneault et al. 1989; Deliyannis et al. 1989). 2.2. Rotation All models used in this paper have been constructed using a version of the Yale Rotating Stellar Evolution Code (Prather 1976, Pinsonneault 1988). Recently, the YREC has been improved in the microscopic diffusion and its interaction with rotational mixing (Chaboyer et al. 1995). The calculation has been carried out using this improved version. The evolutionary sequences were started from fully convective pre-main sequence models in the Hayashi phase. At first, the whole star rotates as a rigid body, and spins up as it contracts. The torque due to the stellar wind then takes over and spins the star down (see below), and in the process of transferring out internal angular momentum, progressively depletes 7Li in the star. The evolution of the internal angular momentum distribution follows the approach of Pinsonneault et al (1989), which includes the effects of rotationally induced instabilities in the radiative layers. This results in a state of differential rotation. The Sun seems to be overdepleted in 7Li compared with other stars of its age and spectral class. Since the amount of mixing in a star increases as its initial rotational velocity increases, it is likely that the Sun was initially a rapid rotator. Therefore, even though observations show that the ma jority of T-Tauri stars have rotation velocities around – 5 – 10km/s, we have chosen an initial rotation velocity of 30km/s for the solar model. Observations of T-Tauri stars also indicate that there is no large difference in surface rotation rates between high and low mass stars over the mass range we study, i.e. 0.5 ∼ 1.2M⊙ (Bouvier 1991; Bouvier et al. 1993), and for this reason, we have the applied the same rotation parameters to all masses. Figure 2 shows the evolution of the rotation period of our theoretical models. It is important to note that changing the initial rotation velocity affects the time-scale for early spin-down, but does not change appreciably the final configuration. This is due to the fact that our calibration requires the solar model to rotate at the present rotation rate of the Sun (the adopted initial rotational velocity affects primarily only the present 7Li abundance, which is not particularly relevant to the convective turnover calculations of this paper). Note in Figure 2 that the rotation period depends sensitively on mass for a given age. When calculating the evolution of the Rossby number, the adopted wind law is the most important input of our rotating models, as internal structural effects of rotation are minimal in these models which rotate relatively slowly. A modified version of Kawaler’s parameterization for the loss of angular momentum due to magnetic stellar wind (Kawaler 1988) has been used (Chaboyer et al. 1995). It is given by: dJ dt = fkKwR2−N M −N/3 M 1−2N/3 ω1+4N/3 (ω < ωcrit), = fkKwR2−N M −N/3 M 1−2N/3 ωω4N/3 crit dJ dt where R is the radius in units of the solar radius (R⊙ ), M is the mass in units of the solar mass (M⊙ ), ωcrit introduces a saturation level into the angular momentum loss law (set to 1.5 × 10−5 s−1 ), Kw = 2.036 × 1033 (cid:0)1.452 × 109 (cid:1)N in cgs units, and M is the mass-loss rate in unit of 10−14M⊙yr−1 (set to 2.0). Here, it is primarily the exponent N in the wind model (a measure of the magnetic field geometry), which determines the rate of angular momentum loss with time. We have adopted the value of 1.5 for N , which reduces to the empirical Skumanich (1972) law near the main sequence i.e., (ω ≥ ωcrit), vrot ∝ τ −.51 , where vrot is equatorial rotation velocity, and τ is the age in Gyr. The constant factor in the wind model, fk , determines the total amount of the angular momentum loss. We adjust fk for a given N to give the solar surface rotation velocity at the solar age. We use the observed value at about 30 degrees from the equator, 1.86km/s, since this value is close to the mean value which from the seismology data, the interior of the Sun appears to approach (Libbrecht and Morrow 1991) For the sake of completeness, the transport of angular momentum and chemical elements have also been taken into account in the models. Two types of rotation-induced mixing – the dynamical shear instabilities and the Solberg-Hoiland instability – and three type of secular instabilities – meridional circulation, the Goldreich-Schubert-Fricke instability, and the secular shear instability – were included in the calculations (Chaboyer et al. 1995, Pinsonneault et al. 1989). – 6 – In this study, the uncertain effects of other secular instabilities are treated as free parameter, and the diffusion coefficients are set to be the same as that of meridional circulation, fc . The value of fc is fixed in the solar model by requiring the model lithium depletion to match the solar value at the solar age. The depletion of Li is inferred by comparing the cosmic abundance with the photospheric abundance. A comparison of the meteoric abundance with the photospheric abundance shows the depletion to be a factor of 140+40 −30 (Anders and Grevesse 1989). We have therefore set the solar 7Li depletion factor equal to 140. 2.3. Diffusion The microscopic diffusion coefficients of Michaud and Proffitt (1993) have been used. They have the advantage of being valid not only for 4H e and 1H , but also for 3H e, 6Li, 7Li, and 9B e. Comparison with the diffusion coefficients of Thoul et al. (1994) indicates that the Michaud-Proffitt coefficients are good to within 15%. Finally we note that when diffusion is taken into account, the surface Z/X is not a constant during a stellar evolution calculation. As 4H e diffuse with respect to hydrogen with the relatively short time scale, the model structures are affected. Measurements of the solar photosphere do not actually determine Z – they measure Z/X (i.e. [F e/H ]). The Anders and Grevesse (1989) photospheric mixture with meteoritic Fe gives Z/X = 0.0267 ± 0.001. Thus, our model of the present Sun was constrained to match this number. 3. Global turnover time and Rossby number The close connection between stellar rotation and its chromospheric emission can be described in terms of general stellar dynamo models. In the mean-field dynamo theory, a dimensionless parameter, the dynamo number, characterizes the model behavior. The dynamo number is essentially proportional to the inverse square of the Rossby number, NR , which is the ratio of the stellar rotation period to the local convective turnover time (Durney and Latour 1978; Noyes et al 1984). Thus, in principle, one could draw a theoretical Rossby number vs. magnetic activity diagram. In practice, however, our knowledge on stellar convection is too limited to calculate ‘correct’ convective turnover times. The characteristic length scales as well as the velocities are not well known. Even when one decides to resort to the mixing length approximation, there are still uncertainties: the mixing length ratio α is assumed to be the same for all stars with different masses and/or at different evolutionary stage, which is probably not be quite correct. In addition, some assumption must be made as to where in the convection zone the dynamo process is operating, since the convective overturn time is strongly depth dependent. For example, Gilman (1980) set the characteristic convective overturn time equal to the convective overturn time one scale height above the bottom of the convective zone. On the other hand, Gilliland (1986) – 7 – determined the turnover time at a distance of half of the mixing length above the base of the convection zone. 3.1. Global convective turnover time To depict the characteristics of convection at each stellar evolution stage, two parameters have been calculated; the ‘global’ convective turnover time, and the Rossby number. For the characteristic time scale of convective overturn, the ‘non-local’ (or ‘global’) convective turnover time has been calculated at each time step. It is: τc = Z R∗ Rb where Rb is the location of of the bottom of the surface convection zone, which is defined where the ∇ − ∇ad = 0, R∗ is the total radius of the stellar model, and v is the local convective velocity. Figure 3 shows the evolution with time of the convective turnover time. Note that in the pre-main sequence phase, τc varies rapidly with time. Near the main sequence, τc remains nearly constant and is primarily a function of mass. dr v 3.2. Rossby number For the Rossby number calculation, the characteristic convective overturn time was set equal to the ‘local’ convective overturn time at a distance of half of the mixing length α HP above the 2 base of the convection zone. The ratio of the rotation period to this characteristic convective overturn time is used to characterize the Rossby number in the deep convection zone, where dynamo generation of magnetic fields is thought to occur. NR = 2πv/αΩHP where v is the characteristic convective velocity, α is the mixing length ratio, Ω is rotational velocity, and HP is the local pressure scale height. It turns out that the evolution of the ‘local’ turnover time is the same as the ‘non-local’ one, except for a scaling factor. The evolution of the inverse squared Rossby number is illustrated in Figure 4. This quantity, sometimes called the ‘dynamo number’, is believed to be proportional to the strength of magnetic activity. Note that the dynamo number depends on both the age and the mass of the star. 4. Isochrones Theoretical isochrones offer the opportunity to test stellar evolution theory in star clusters where stars are coeval and formed from a gas cloud of uniform composition. Conversely, when properly calibrated, isochrones can become a powerful tool to study the properties of field stars. – 8 – Isochrones were constructed using the evolutionary tracks for the ages of 0.2, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 4.55 (the solar age), 10, and 15 Gyr. Their characteristics are listed in Table 2. Figure 5 shows a plot of isochrones of the non-local turnover time vs. log Tef f (the solid lines). For comparison, a few isochrones of the local turnover time are shown (the dotted lines), in the same figure. Isochrones of the non-local turnover time vs. rotation period are given in Figure 6. In Figure 7, rotation period vs. log Tef f is shown, where the increase of log Tef f can be understood as the increase of the stellar mass, because of the proximity of the main sequence. The right most point of each line is for 0.5 M⊙ . Assuming our treatment of stellar rotation is correct, then one can use Figure 7 to uniquely determine stellar mass and age from the effective temperature and the rotation period. Figure 8 shows the the inverse square of the Rossby number, N −2 R vs. log Tef f . Once empirical relations between N −2 R and magnetic activity indices are determined, one can use Figure 8 for determination of the age and the mass of a star by observing its effective temperature and an activity index. Figure 9 is the plot of N −2 R vs. rotation period, where for an isochrone, the right most point of the line represent the lowest mass. We see that, given the assumptions implicit in our discussion, our grid of theoretical evolutionary tracks provide the means to determine the age and the mass of a star from a measurement of its rotation period and an activity index. 5. Discussion Estimates of turnover time scales and the Rossby number are provided, for Sun-like stars in the pre-main sequence and early post-main sequence phases of evolution, based on up-to-date physical input for the stellar models, and including rotation. We expect the results in this paper to be robust, since the convective turnover timescale is weighted toward the deepest part of the convection zone, where the shortcomings of the mixing length approximation are least important. This is the reason why our ‘global’ and ‘local’ convective time scale give the same result except for a scaling factor (e.g. Figure 5). This is consistent with recent numerical simulations of convection (e.g. Chan and Sofia 1989; Kim et al. 1995b) which confirm the validity of the mixing length approximation in the limit of deep and efficient convection. In this study, all models have solar abundances; they will therefore find applications in the interpretation of the rotational history and magnetic activity indices for stars in young star clusters and Sun-like field stars, which are the most common stars in our part of the Galactic disk. Caution must be exercised, however, with stars with chemical composition that differ appreciably from solar. Both the depth of the convection zone and the convective velocities are known to depend on opacities and equation of state. As more detailed observations about the rotational properties and magnetic activity of very metal-poor and very metal rich stars become available, the sensitivity of convective turnover timescales to chemical composition parameters will need to be explored in some detail. – 9 – YCK would like to thank B. Chaboyer and M. Pinsonneault. This work was supported in part by NASA grants NAG5-1486 and NAGW-2469 to Yale University. REFERENCES Anders, E. and Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197 Baliunas, S. L. Vaughan, A. H., Hartmann, L., Middelkoop, F., Mihalas, D., et al. 1983, ApJ, 275, 752 Basri, G. 1987, ApJ, 316, 377 Bouvier, J. 1991, in Angular Momentum Evolution of Young Stars, ed. S. Catalano and J. R. Stauffer (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 41 Bouvier, J., Cabrit, S., Fernandez, M. E. L. and Matthews, J. M. 1993, A&A, 272, 176 Chaboyer, B., Demarque, P. and Pinsonneault, M. H. 1995, ApJ, 441, 865 Chaboyer, B., Demarque, P., Guenther, D. B. and Pinsonneault, M. H. 1995, ApJ, 446, 445 Chan, K. -L. and Sofia, S. 1989, ApJ, 336, 1022 Deliyannis, C. P., Demarque, P. and Pinsonneault, M. H. 1989, ApJ, 347, L73 Dobson, A. K. and Radick, R. R. 1989, ApJ, 344, 907 Durney, B. R. and Latour, J. 1978, Geophys Ap Fluid Dyn, 9, 241 Durney, B. R., Mihalas, D. and Robinson, R. D. 1981, PASP, 93, 587 Durney, B. R. and Robinson, R. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 290 Endal, A. S. and Sofia, S. 1978, ApJ, 220, 279 Endal, A. S. and Sofia, S. 1981, ApJ, 243, 625 Gilliland, R. L. 1985, ApJ, 299, 286 Gilliland, R. L. 1986, ApJ300,339 Gilman, P. 1980, in Stellar Turbulence, IAU Colloq. No. 51, ed. D. Gray, J. Linsky (New York: Springer-Verlag), 19 Green, E. M., Demarque, P. and King, C. R. 1987, Revised Yale Isochrones and Luminosity Functions, Yale University Observatory, New Haven Guenther, P. 1989, ApJ, 39, 1156 Guenther, D. B., Demarque, P., Kim, Y. -C. and Pinsonneault, M. H. 1992, ApJ, 387, 372 Guenther, D. B., Kim, Y. -C. and Demarque, P. 1995, in preparation Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K. and Noyes, R. W. 1984 ApJ, 279, 778 Iglesias, C. A. and Rogers, F. J. 1991, ApJ, 371, 408 – 10 – Kawaler, S. D. 1988, ApJ, 333, 236 Kim, Y. -C., Fox, P. A., Sofia, S. and Demarque, P. 1995a ApJ, 442, 422 Kim, Y. -C., Fox, P. A., Demarque, P. and Sofia, S. 1995b ApJ, submitted Kurucz, R. L. 1991, in Stellar Atmospheres: Beyond Classical Models, ed. L. Crivellari, I. Hubeny and D. G. Hummer (Dordrecht:Kluwer), 440 Kurucz, R. L. 1992, in The Stellar Population of Galaxies, IAU Symposium No.149, ed. B. Barbuy and A. Renzini (Dordrecht:Kluwer), 225 Libbrecht, K. G. and Morrow, C. A. 1991, in Solar Interior and Atmosphere, ed. A.N. Cox, W.C. Livingston and M.S. Matthews (Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press), 479 Lydon, T. J., Fox, P. A. and Sofia, S. 1992, ApJ, 397, 701 Mangeney, A. and Praderie, F. 1984, A&A, 130, 143 Michaud, G. and Proffitt, C. R. 1993, in Inside the Stars, IAU Colloq. 137, ed. A. Baglin and W. W. Weiss (San Francisco: ASP), 246 Noyes, R. W. 1983, in Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields:Origin and Coronal Effects, ed. J. O. Stenflo (Dordrecht:Reidel), 133 Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K. and Vaughan, A. H. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763 Pinsonneault, M. H. 1988, Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University Pinsonneault, M. H., Kawaler, S. D. and Demarque, P. 1990, ApJS, 74, 501 Pinsonneault, M. H., Kawaler, S. D., Sofia, S. and Demarque, P. 1989, ApJ, 338, 424 Prather, M. J. 1976, Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University Rogers, F. J. and Iglesias, C. A. 1994, Science, 263, 50 Rucinski, S. M. and VandenBerg, D. A. 1986, PASP, 98, 669 Rucinski, S. M. and VandenBerg, D. A. 1990, AJ, 90, 1279 Shrijver, C. J. and Rutten, R. G. M. 1987, A&A, 177, 155 Simon, T. and Fekel, F. C. 1987, ApJ, 316, 434 Simon, T, Herbig, G. and Boesgaard, A. M. 1985, ApJ, 293, 551 Skumanich, A. 1972, ApJ, 171, 565 Thoul, A. A., Bahcall, J. N. and Loeb, A. 1994, ApJ, 421, 828 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. – 11 – Figure Captions Figure 1: The evolutionary tracks in the theoretical HR-diagram. Several isochrones have also been drawn for 1 Gyr to 15 Gyr. The lower age isochrones are indisguishable from the 1 Gyr isochrone on the scale of this diagram. Figure 2: The rotation period as a function of age and mass. The slope near the main sequence of each mass curve corresponds to the Skumanich law with a proportionality factor which depends on mass. Figure 3: The non-local convective turnover time as a function of age and mass. Near the main sequence, τc remains nearly constant with time for a given mass. Figure 4: The dynamo number (∝ N −2 R ), often used as a measure of magnetic activity strength, as a function of age and mass. This plot (together with Figures 8 and 9) provides the means of calibrating magnetic activity indices along the main sequence of a star cluster. Figure 5: The global and local convective turnover times as a function of effective temperature and age. Figure 6: Global convective turnover time as a function of rotation period and age. Figure 7: Rotation period as a function of effective temperature and age. Figure 8: The dynamo number as a function of effective temperature and age. Figure 9: The dynamo number as a function of rotation period and age. – 12 – Table 1. Input physics Parameter Input Mass Mixing length ratio Weight fraction of hydrogen, X Weight fraction of all heavy elements, Z Mixture of heavy elements The exponent in the wind model, N The constant factor in the wind model, fk The diffusion coefficient, fc Initial rotation velocity Opacity tables Atmosphere Equation of state The microscopic diffusion 0.5 ∼ 1.2M⊙ 1.86315 0.70952 0.01926 Anders-Grevesse(1989) 1.5 17.4837 0.05575 30 km s−1 OPAL with Kurucz opacity tables for low temperature Kurucz model atmosphere The standard implementation with Debye-Huckel correction Michaud and Proffitt (1993) – 13 – Table 2. Isochrones M/M⊙ log Tef f (B − V ) a log L/L⊙ b τc (day) N −2 R c Rotation Period (day) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 3.54 3.59 3.64 3.68 3.72 3.75 3.78 3.80 3.53 3.59 3.64 3.68 3.72 3.75 3.78 3.80 3.53 3.59 3.64 3.68 3.72 3.75 3.78 3.80 1.55 1.37 1.16 0.99 0.83 0.69 0.57 0.49 1.60 1.37 1.16 0.99 0.83 0.69 0.57 0.49 1.60 1.37 1.16 0.99 0.83 0.69 0.57 0.49 0.20 Gyr -1.50 -1.19 -0.88 -0.61 -0.36 -0.14 0.06 0.24 0.50 Gyr -1.53 -1.18 -0.87 -0.60 -0.35 -0.13 0.07 0.26 0.70 Gyr -1.53 -1.18 -0.87 -0.60 -0.35 -0.13 0.08 0.27 125.10 104.06 83.19 66.50 53.15 40.27 27.49 13.95 137.40 106.56 84.84 67.18 53.07 39.97 26.97 13.14 140.32 107.55 84.88 67.40 52.96 40.00 26.76 12.87 6.18 27.58 28.40 24.13 18.90 13.30 7.73 2.48 11.13 13.57 11.77 9.31 7.01 4.82 2.56 0.69 9.26 10.14 8.42 6.57 4.92 3.37 1.77 0.46 23.41 9.18 7.23 6.31 5.69 5.19 4.67 4.13 19.19 13.44 11.46 10.25 9.33 8.57 7.94 7.42 21.32 15.69 13.59 12.22 11.12 10.21 9.44 8.81 – 14 – Table 2—Continued M/M⊙ log Tef f (B − V ) a log L/L⊙ b τc (day) N −2 R c Rotation Period (day) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 3.53 3.59 3.64 3.69 3.72 3.75 3.78 3.80 3.53 3.59 3.64 3.69 3.73 3.76 3.78 3.80 3.53 3.59 3.64 3.69 3.73 3.76 3.78 3.78 1.60 1.37 1.16 0.95 0.83 0.69 0.57 0.49 1.60 1.37 1.16 0.95 0.78 0.65 0.57 0.49 1.60 1.37 1.16 0.95 0.78 0.65 0.57 0.57 1.00 Gyr -1.53 -1.18 -0.87 -0.59 -0.34 -0.12 0.09 0.29 2.00 Gyr -1.53 -1.18 -0.86 -0.58 -0.32 -0.09 0.14 0.34 4.55 Gyr -1.52 -1.16 -0.84 -0.54 -0.26 0.00 0.25 0.44 141.14 108.04 85.43 67.49 52.74 39.86 26.32 12.40 142.19 108.88 85.26 67.28 52.62 39.25 25.00 11.44 144.87 110.05 85.10 66.70 51.21 37.49 24.82 26.42 7.15 7.30 5.90 4.55 3.40 2.31 1.19 0.30 4.11 3.73 2.91 2.22 1.63 1.07 0.53 0.13 1.80 1.54 1.19 0.89 0.65 0.41 0.22 0.28 24.45 18.61 16.29 14.68 13.37 12.28 11.34 10.56 32.61 26.23 23.24 20.98 19.19 17.72 16.23 15.07 49.92 40.97 36.26 32.77 29.83 27.66 25.14 23.40 – 15 – Table 2—Continued M/M⊙ log Tef f (B − V ) a log L/L⊙ b τc (day) N −2 R c Rotation Period (day) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 3.53 3.59 3.65 3.70 3.74 3.75 3.54 3.60 3.66 3.71 3.74 1.60 1.37 1.11 0.91 0.74 0.69 1.55 1.33 1.07 0.87 0.74 10.00 Gyr -1.50 -1.13 -0.78 -0.45 -0.11 0.28 15.00 Gyr -1.48 -1.10 -0.73 -0.34 0.13 145.61 109.32 83.95 65.26 50.58 50.94 144.95 108.32 83.08 64.97 68.27 0.73 0.62 0.47 0.33 0.24 0.32 0.39 0.33 0.24 0.18 0.34 78.38 64.26 56.79 52.86 48.69 42.01 107.04 87.34 78.18 70.55 53.99 a Revised Yale Isochrones and Luminosity Functions (Green et al. 1987) b τc = R R∗ dr v(r) , where Rb is the location of the bottom of the surface convection zone, R∗ Rb is the total radius of the stellar model, and v(r) is the convective velocity as a function of radius. c NR = 2πv/αΩHP where v is the local convective velocity at a distance of the half of the mixing length α HP above the base of the convection zone, α is the mixing length ratio, Ω 2 is rotational velocity, and HP is the local pressure scale height.
0707.1316	2	0707	2007-08-30T18:22:07	Fast Collisionless Reconnection Condition and Self-Organization of Solar Coronal Heating	[ "astro-ph", "physics.plasm-ph", "physics.space-ph" ]	I propose that solar coronal heating is a self-regulating process that keeps the coronal plasma roughly marginally collisionless. The self-regulating mechanism is based on the interplay of two effects. First, plasma density controls coronal energy release via the transition between the slow collisional Sweet-Parker regime and the fast collisionless reconnection regime. This transition takes place when the Sweet--Parker layer becomes thinner than the characteristic collisionless reconnection scale. I present a simple criterion for this transition in terms of the upstream plasma density (n_e), the reconnecting (B_0) and guide (B_z) magnetic field components, and the global length (L) of the reconnection layer: L < 6.10^9 cm [n_e/(10^{10}/cm^3)]^(-3) (B_0/30G)^4 (B_0/B_z)^2. Next, coronal energy release by reconnection raises the ambient plasma density via chromospheric evaporation and this, in turn, temporarily inhibits subsequent reconnection involving the newly-reconnected loops. Over time, however, radiative cooling gradually lowers the density again below the critical value and fast reconnection again becomes possible. As a result, the density is highly inhomogeneous and intermittent but, statistically, does not deviate strongly from the critical value which is comparable with the observed coronal density. Thus, in the long run, the coronal heating process can be represented by repeating cycles that consist of fast reconnection events (i.e., nanoflares), followed by rapid evaporation episodes, followed by relatively long periods (1-hour) during which magnetic stresses build up and simultaneously the plasma cools down and precipitates.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version October 29, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 7 0 0 2 g u A 0 3 ] h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 6 1 3 1 . 7 0 7 0 : v i X r a FAST COLLISIONLESS RECONNECTION CONDITION AND SELF-ORGANIZATION OF SOLAR CORONAL HEATING Dmitri A. Uzdensky1 (Dated: August 27, 2007) Draft version October 29, 2018 ABSTRACT I propose that solar coronal heating is a self-regulating process that keeps the coronal plasma roughly marginally collisionless. The self-regulating mechanism is based on the interplay of two effects. First, plasma density controls coronal energy release via the transition between the slow collisional Sweet -- Parker regime and the fast collisionless reconnection regime. This transition takes place when the Sweet -- Parker layer becomes thinner than the characteristic collisionless reconnection scale. I present a simple criterion for this transition in terms of the upstream plasma density (ne), the reconnecting (B0) and guide (Bz) magnetic field components, and the global length (L) of the reconnection layer: L . 6 · 109 cm (ne/1010cm−3)−3 (B0/30 G)4 (B0/Bz)2. Next, coronal energy release by reconnection raises the ambient plasma density via chromospheric evaporation and this, in turn, temporarily inhibits subsequent reconnection involving the newly-reconnected loops. Over time, however, radiative cooling gradually lowers the density again below the critical value and fast reconnection again becomes possible. As a result, the density is highly inhomogeneous and intermittent but, statistically, does not deviate strongly from the critical value which is comparable with the observed coronal density. Thus, in the long run, the coronal heating process can be represented by repeating cycles that consist of fast reconnection events (i.e., nanoflares), followed by rapid evaporation episodes, followed by relatively long periods ( . 1 hr) during which magnetic stresses build up and simultaneously the plasma cools down and precipitates. Subject headings: magnetic fields -- MHD -- Sun: corona -- Sun: magnetic fields -- Sun: flares 1. INTRODUCTION In this paper I address some aspects of solar coronal heating (see Aschwanden et al. 2001b and Klimchuk 2006 for recent reviews) in the context of Parker's nanoflare model (Parker 1972, 1983, 1988). A more concise version of this work is presented in Uzdensky (2006, 2007). Since the main heating process in the nanoflare model is magnetic reconnection, I first discuss what we have learned about reconnection in the past 20 years or so (see § 2). I argue that, even though we still do not have a complete picture of reconnection, there now appears to be some consensus in the magnetic reconnection commu- nity about some of its fundamental aspects. One of the main goals of this paper is to use this emerging knowl- edge to shed some new light on the old coronal heating problem. In this paper I purposefully adopt a rather conservative approach: I invoke only those very few re- sults that seem to be relatively firmly established and try not to rely on those details of reconnection physics that are still under vigorous debate. Specifically, there is now strong evidence coming from numerous numerical simu- lations and some laborious laboratory experiments that there are two main modes of reconnection: slow Sweet -- Parker reconnection taking place in collisional plasmas where classical resistive MHD applies; and fast Petschek- like reconnection in collisionless plasmas (in § 2.1). The transition between these two regimes seems to be rather sharp. An approximate condition for this transition 1 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 -- Center for Magnetic Self- Organization (CMSO); [email protected]. can be formulated as a relationship between the global length L of the reconnecting system and the electron col- lisional mean-free path inside the layer, λe,mfp (see § 2.2). Furthermore, this condition can be cast in terms of the plasma density n, the reconnecting magnetic field B0, and L; namely, one can define a critical density nc(L, B0) below which reconnection switches to the fast regime. In the strong-guide field case, Bz ≫ B0, the condition is modified; namely, the critical density for transition to fast reconnection is suppressed by a factor of order (Bz ≫ B0)2/3 (see § 2.4). In § 2.5 I address various alternative ideas and caveats that may complicate the above simple picture. I then apply these results to the active solar corona (in § 3), viewed withing the nanoflare model. My main point here is that the corona should be regarded as a self- regulating machine keeping itself (in a statistical sense) around marginal collisionality. This conclusion comes from the interplay between the way the plasma density controls reconnection via the above collisionless recon- nection transition, and the way the coronal magnetic en- ergy release due to reconnection in turn controls the am- bient gas density via chromospheric evaporation. The coronal heating process is then highly intermittent and inhomogeneous; it can be thought of a sequence of char- acteristic energy-circulation cycles that occur simulta- neously in a broad range of spatial, temporal, and en- ergy scales. Each such elementary cycle consists of sev- eral phases: (1) a fast reconnection event (a nanoflare) causing (2) an evaporation episode filling the loop with hot dense plasma, followed by (3) a longer period during which the magnetic stresses build up and the plasma den- 2 D. A. Uzdensky sity goes down due to slow radiative cooling (and thermal conduction). It is the collisionless reconnection condition that makes this scenario (in particular, the last phase) possible. Indeed, an important point here is that, even if a current sheet is formed, it will stay in the slow Sweet -- Parker state if the density is large enough. This will continue for some time, until the reconnecting magnetic field becomes strong enough and/or the ambient plasma density becomes low enough for the system to transi- tion to the fast collisionless reconnection regime. This enables a non-trivial amount of free magnetic energy to be accumulated before a sudden release. This energy amount, along with the characteristic time-scale between nanoflares and the characteristic coronal density, is de- termined, statistically, by the balance between the rate at which current sheets are created and amplified by the photospheric footpoint motions and the efficiency of ra- diative cooling. The collisionless reconnection condition plays a key role in this process as a mediator and ulti- mately governs the statistical distribution of the coronal reconnection events (flares). In § 4, I discuss some of the open questions that, in my view, need to (and can) be addressed in the near future, in order to see whether the physical picture put forward in this paper is correct and what modifications should be made to improve it. This section is mostly tar- geted towards researchers doing numerical simulations of reconnection and also to experimentalists and observers. Finally, I present my conclusions in § 5. I also would like to make a clarifying remark about the terms "collisional" and "collisionless" that will be used many times throughout this paper. Often, by "collisionless" one means a regime in which Ωe > νe,i, i.e., when the electron gyro-frequency is higher than the electron-ion collision rate. Equivalently, this means that λe,mfp > ρe. In this paper, on the other hand, the terms "collisional" and "collisionless" will involve com- paring λe,mfp not with the gyro-radius, but instead with the system size L, or, more precisely, with L divided by the square root of the ion/electron mass ratio. As will be explained in §§ 2.2 -- 2.3 [specifically, see eq. (4) and the discussion at the end of § 2.3], this choice of termi- nology turns out to be more relevant to the reconnection problem. 2. FAST COLLISIONLESS RECONNECTION CONDITION 2.1. The Existence of Two Reconnection Regimes Magnetic reconnection research started 50 years ago with the Sweet -- Parker (SP) theory (Sweet 1958; Parker 1957) for solar flares. As was realized immediately at that time, this relatively simple and elegant theory could not reproduce the very short (∼ 103 sec) reconnec- tion timescales required by flare observations; instead, it predicted reconnection times of order a few weeks or months. After several years, however, Petschek (1964) proposed a modification to the classic Sweet -- Parker the- ory that apparently resulted in a much higher reconnec- tion rate, thus eliminating the main contradiction with observations. He realized that the main bottleneck in the Sweet -- Parker reconnection model is the need to have a reconnection layer that is both thin enough for the resis- tivity to be important and at the same time thick enough for the plasma to be able to flow out. The result of this compromise is the famous Sweet -- Parker scaling for the thickness δSP of the reconnection layer and for the recon- nection velocity vrec: δSP L = vrec VA =r η LVA ≡ S−1/2 , (1) where L is the global length of the reconnection layer, of order the system size, η is the magnetic diffusivity, and VA is the Alfv´en speed corresponding to the recon- necting (in-plane) magnetic field component. Since the Lundquist number in the solar corona is usually very large (1012 or greater), the layer is very thin and the resulting reconnection rate is very small. Furthermore, Petschek (1964) proposed that this difficulty can be cir- cumvented if the reconnection region has a certain special structure: the famous Petschek configuration, with four slow-mode shocks attached to a small Sweet -- Parker cen- tral diffusion region. As he showed, this structure gave an additional geometric factor that could lead to a much faster reconnection rate. I would like to emphasize the special importance of Petschek's idea for reconnection in astrophysical sys- tems, including the solar corona. As I will discuss below, there are several local physical effects (e.g., Hall effect or anomalous resistivity) that can indeed broaden the reconnection layer and prevent it from collapsing down to the very small Sweet -- Parker thickness δSP. However, each of these processes comes with its own microscopic physical scale, e.g., the ion gyro-radius ρi or the ion collisionless skin-depth di ≡ c/ωpi. These scales are determined by the local values of the basic plasma pa- rameters inside the reconnection layer, such as magnetic field, density, or temperature. The important point is that they know nothing about the overall global system size L. Astronomical systems are often astronomically large, however. That is, L is typically much larger than any microscopic physical scale δ and than the Sweet -- Parker layer thickness (which is a hybrid length-scale). Therefore, any simple Sweet -- Parker-like analysis would give a reconnection rate vrec/VA scaling as δ/L ≪ 1; this would not be rapid enough to be of any practical inter- est. Thus, we come to Conclusion I: irrespective of the actual microphysics inside the layer, Petschek's mecha- nism, or a variation thereof, is absolutely necessary for sufficiently fast astrophysical reconnection, including so- lar flares (and even micro- and nanoflares). Because Petschek's model was able to reproduce the very short observed flare timescales, it quickly became very popular and people have believed in it for the next 20 years. With the advent of computer simulations, how- ever, the original Petschek model came under fire. In particular, several numerical studies (e.g., Biskamp 1986; Scholer 1989; Ugai 1992, 1999; Ma & Bhattacharjee 1996; Uzdensky & Kulsrud 1998, 2000; Erkaev et al. 2000, 2001; Biskamp & Schwarz 2001; Birn et al. 2001; Malyshkin et al. 2005; Cassak 2005, 2006) showed that in resistive MHD with uniform resistivity (and, by infer- ence, with resistivity that is a smooth function of plasma parameters, e.g., Spitzer, see Biskamp & Schwarz 2001) Petschek's mechanism fails and Sweet -- Parker scaling ap- plies instead. The basic physical reason for this, as has been elucidated analytically by Kulsrud (2001), (see also Uzdensky & Kulsrud 2000 and Malyshkin et al. 2005) Solar Coronal Heating 3 is that the transverse (i.e., perpendicular to the current sheet) magnetic field component, which is necessary to sustain Petschek's shocks, is swept away by the Alfv´enic flow out of the layer so rapidly that it cannot be regen- erated by the nonuniform resistive merging of the recon- necting magnetic field component. In addition, a strong evidence for the existence of a slow Sweet-Parker reconnection mode in col- lisional resistive-MHD plasmas has been obtained from recent laboratory studies in the Magnetic Re- connection Experiment (MRX; Yamada et al. 1997) in the high-collisionality regime et al. 1998; Trintchouk et al. 2003; Kuritsin et al. 2006). (Ji This enables us to draw Conclusion II: In the col- lisional regime, when classical resistive MHD applies, Petschek's fast reconnection mechanism does not work; slow Sweet -- Parker reconnection process takes place in- stead. A very natural question to ask next is whether fast Petschek-like reconnection possible in a collisionless plasma, where resistive MHD does not apply. There is now a growing consensus that the answer to this question is YES. In Solar and Space physics, of course, there has long been plentiful observational evidence for fast colli- sionless reconnection, in solar flares (e.g., Tsuneta et al. 1984, 1992, 1996; Masuda et al. 1994, 1995; Shibata 1995, 1996; Yokoyama et al. 2001), and in the Earth magne- tosphere, both in the magnetopause (e.g., Mozer et al. 2002, 2003, 2004) and in the magnetotail (Oieroset et al. 2001; Nagai et al. 2001). The evidence for fast collision- less reconnection has been further significantly strength- ened by recent laboratory measurements in the MRX (Ji et al. 1998, 2004; Yamada et al. 2006) and other de- vices (e.g., Brown 1999; Egedal et al. 2007; Brown et al. 2006). These laboratory measurements, however, have not been able to elucidate the special role of the Petschek mechanism in accelerating reconnection. On the other hand, over the past decade or so, several theoretical and numerical studies have indicated that fast reconnec- tion enhanced by the Petschek mechanism (or a vari- ation thereof) does indeed take place in the collision- less regime. Moreover, it appears that there may be two mechanisms of collisionless reconnection. Physically, these two mechanisms are very different from each other; nevertheless, they both appear to lead to the establish- ment of a Petschek-like configuration, which enhances the reconnection rate. The two regimes in question are: • Hall-MHD reconnection, involving two-fluid effects in a laminar flow configuration (e.g., Mandt et al. 1994; Kleva et al. 1995; Biskamp et al. 1995, 1997; Ma & Bhattacharjee 1996; Lottermoser & Scholer 1997; Shay et al. 1998, 1999, 2001; Hesse et al. 1999, 2001; Birn et al. 2001; Rogers et al. 2001; Pritchett 2001; Breslau & Jardin 2003; Cassak et al. 2005, 2006; Daughton et al. 2006). 1999; Bhattacharjee et al. • Spatially-localized anomalous resistivity due to plasma micro-turbulence that is excited when the current density exceeds a certain threshold (e.g., Coppi & Friedland 1971; Smith & Priest 1972; Coroniti & Eviatar 1977; Kulsrud 2001, 2005; Kul- srud et al. 2005). This seems to lead to a Petschek configuration with the length of the inner diffusion region being on the order of the resistivity localiza- tion scale (e.g., Ugai & Tsuda 1977; Sato & Hayashi 1979; Ugai 1986, 1992, 1999; Scholer 1989; Biskamp & Schwarz 2001; Erkaev et al. 2001; Kulsrud 2001, 2005; Uzdensky 2003; Malyshkin et al. 2005). The corresponding reconnection rate is then fast enough to explain the relatively-short timescales observed in solar flares (e.g., Kulsrud 2001, 2005; Uzden- sky 2003). Recent experimental evidence from the MRX exper- iment indicates that both anomalous resistivity (e.g, Ji et al. 2004) and Hall effect (Ren et al. 2005; Ya- mada et al. 2006; Brown et al. 2006; Egedal et al. 2007) are present and may be important in collisionless recon- nection. However, at present, it is still not clear which one of these two mechanisms works in a given physical situation (if at all). Also not known is whether these two mechanisms can operate simultaneously in a given system and how they interact with each other. In any case, from the point of view of our present discussion, the important thing is that one does get a Petschek-enhanced fast reconnection if the plasma is col- lisionless (in the sense that will be specified below, see § 2.2). Thus, we can draw Conclusion III: a Petschek- enhanced fast reconnection does happen in the collision- less regime. To sum up, there are two regimes of astrophysical mag- netic reconnection: slow Sweet -- Parker reconnection in resistive-MHD with classical collisional resistivity, and fast Petschek-like reconnection in collisionless plasmas. In other words, in order for reconnection to be fast, it needs Petschek's mechanism to operate and that in turn requires the reconnection layer to be collisionless. In fact, whenever we observe violent and rapid ener- getic phenomena that we interpret as reconnection, it is always in relatively tenuous plasmas. I am not aware of any counter-examples and would be would be very inter- ested in learning about them. Is there any evidence for fast large-scale reconnection events in collisional astro- physical environments? 2.2. The Fast Reconnection Condition: Zero Guide Field Case How can one quantify the transition between the two regimes? For clarity, let us first consider the case with zero guide field, Bz = 0. [In the Bz 6= 0 case some of the arguments and results presented in this section will be somewhat modified; however, the main concepts and conclusions will remain similar, as we show in the next section (see § 2.4).] When there is no guide field (strictly anti-parallel field merging), the condition for fast reconnection can be for- mulated roughly as (Kulsrud 2001, 2005; Uzdensky 2003; Cassak et al. 2005; Yamada et al. 2006) δSP < di ≡ c ωpi . (2) What this condition means is the following. As a recon- nection layer forms, its thickness δ becomes smaller and smaller. If condition (2) is not satisfied, then this thin- ning saturates at δ = δSP; then, reconnection proceeds in the slow Sweet -- Parker regime. On the other hand, if 4 D. A. Uzdensky condition (2) is satisfied, then various two-fluid and/or kinetic effects kick in as soon as δ drops down to about di or so, i.e., well before the resistive term becomes impor- tant. Then, the reconnection processes necessarily in- volves collisionless, non-classical-resistive-MHD physics. This results in a rapid increase in the reconnection rate, as has been recently documented experimentally in the MRX (Yamada et al. 2006). Note that, by construction, δSP that enters in equa- tion (2) is to be calculated using the classical Spitzer resistivity. Therefore, and since we are talking about col- lisional and collisionless reconnection, it is instructive to express the above condition in terms of the classical elec- tron mean free path due to Coulomb collisions, λe,mfp. It is pretty straight-forward to show (Yamada et al. 2006) that , (3) δSP di ∼(cid:18) L λe,mfp(cid:19)1/2(cid:18)βe me mi(cid:19)1/4 Here, βe is the ratio of the electron pressure inside the layer to the pressure of the reconnecting magnetic field component (B2 0/8π) outside the layer. Thus, using equa- tion (2), we see that a reconnection layer is collisionless when e λe,mfp . (4) L < Lc ≡ λe,mfppmi/βeme ≃ 40 β−1/2 The collisionless reconnection condition in a similar form has been first published by Yamada et al. (2006). Their condition actually differs from equation (4) by a factor of 2. Since the discussion here is very qualitative, I re- gard this difference as unessential. Moreover, to make the present discussion more clear, I systematically ignore numerical factors of order 1 everywhere in this paper. We can go a little bit further. The mean free path λe,mfp can be written as k2 BT 2 e λe,mfp ∼ nee4 log Λ ≃ 7 · 107cm n−1 10 T 2 7 , (5) where we set the Coulomb logarithm equal to 20 and where n10 and T7 are the central layer electron den- sity ne and temperature Te given in units of 1010 cm−3 and 107 K, respectively. Combining equations (4) and (5), the criterion for fast collisionless reconnection can now be formulated as a condition on the layer's length L in terms of the values of ne and Te at the center of the Sweet -- Parker reconnection layer: e e n−1 10 T 2 λe,mfp ≃ 3·109cm β−1/2 L < Lc ≡ 40 β−1/2 7 . (6) Notice that the critical layer length Lc strongly de- pends on the central electron temperature Te. The main cause for this high sensitivity is the strong tem- perature dependence of the electron mean free path and hence Spitzer resistivity. It is therefore very important to figure out what the electron temperature inside the Sweet -- Parker reconnection layer should be. In a situa- tion where the ambient (upstream) pressure is already high, βupstream ≥ 1, the conversion of magnetic en- ergy to plasma via reconnection is not going to affect the plasma temperature and density considerably. In this case, both the plasma temperature and the density should be roughly uniform across the layer; then one can just substitute their upstream values into equation (6). The story then ends here. However, in this paper we will be mostly inter- ested in environments that are (globally) magnetically- dominated (and hence almost force-free), such as the so- lar corona and coronae of other stars and accretion disks. In this case, the ambient thermal pressure is smaller than the reconnecting magnetic field pressure. It is then im- portant to distinguish the temperature inside the layer from the ambient coronal temperature (which is much lower). The simplest first step towards determining Te is to note that, in the case with zero guide field, the condi- tion of pressure balance across the layer dictates that β ≡ 8πnekB(Te + Ti) B2 0 = 1 . (7) Next, assuming that Te inside a Sweet -- Parker reconnec- tion layer is approximately equal to (and in any case not much smaller than) the ion temperature Ti -- the self- consistency of this assumption will be demonstrated at the end of this section -- we see that βe should generally be close to 1/2 (and in any case of order 1). Then, using the pressure-balance condition (7), we can express the central electron temperature in terms of B0 and ne as Te = B2 0 /8π 2kBne ≃ 1.4 · 107 K B2 1.5 n−1 10 , (8) where B1.5 is the outside magnetic field B0 expressed in units of 30 G. Upon substituting this expression into equation (5), we get λe,mfp ≃ 1.5 · 108cm n−3 10 B4 1.5 , (9) and so the fast collisionless reconnection condition can be written in the final form as L < Lc(n, B0) ≃ 6 · 109cm n−3 10 B4 1.5 . (10) We see that the condition L < Lc is often satisfied in the solar corona (e.g., in solar flares) and is definitely always satisfied in the Earth magnetosphere. 2.3. Plasma Temperature and Density inside the Sweet -- Parker Reconnection Layer Note that the density that enters in the above expres- sions is, by definition, the density at the center of the reconnection layer. In general, it is not known a priori and we would like, instead, to get expressions involving the background (upstream) density. Equation (7) gives us one relationship between the two desired quantities (central ne and Te). However, we need to know both of them and by itself, equation (7) does not tell us whether the central pressure is increased (from a very low ambi- ent value) to the required equilibrium level by raising the density or the temperature. I will now argue, however, that, in the regime that is relevant here, the latter is more likely to be the case, i.e., that the pressure increase is mostly due to the increased temperature, whereas the density should change relatively little. Indeed, as is evident from the above discussion, the main reason for the strong density dependence in equa- tion (10) is the Te-dependence of the classical Spitzer resistivity, combined with the pressure balance condi- tion (7). Therefore, what we are mostly interested in here are the central electron density and temperature in the Solar Coronal Heating 5 context of the resistive Sweet -- Parker theory. To deter- mine them, we need more detailed information. Namely, we need to consider one more equation that we have not discussed up until now -- the equation of energy conser- vation. In general this equation should take into account Ohmic heating and all the relevant loss mechanisms, such as advection, radiation, and electron thermal conduction. Let us consider a fluid element as it travels through the reconnection layer. During its transit, the fluid element is subject to Ohmic heating and to all the above loss mech- anisms. The characteristic time for the advection term is of course just the Alfv´en transit time τA ∼ L/VA -- the time a fluid element spends inside the layer. During this time the element is continuously heated by Ohmic heating, whose rate per unit volume can be estimated within the Sweet -- Parker theory as 4πδ(cid:19)2 η′j2 ∼ η′(cid:18) cB0 ∼ B2 0 4π η δ2 = B2 0 4π ηS L2 = B2 0 4π L VA , (11) where the magnetic diffusivity η is related to the resistiv- ity η′ via η = η′c2/4π.2 Thus, during its transit, the fluid element acquires just the right amount of heat to raise its temperature to about the equipartition level given by equation (8) (Uzdensky 2003). We now need to see under what conditions one can ignore various loss mechanisms, namely, radiation and thermal conduction. First, it is easy to see that, in the case of the solar corona, the radiative losses are indeed negligible on the time scales of interest (τA). Indeed, the radiative cooling time is determined by the cooling function Q(T ) via τrad ∼ 2cvnkBT n2Q(T ) = 3kBT nQ(T ) . (12) In the temperature range of interest to the solar corona, 106 K ≤ Te ≤ 108 K, the cooling function varies between 10−23 and 10−22 erg sec−1 cm3 (e.g., Rosner et al. 1978; Priest 1984, p. 88; Cook et al. 1989). Then, taking n = 1010 cm−3, the typical radiative cooling times are of order 10 min (for T = 2 · 106 K) and longer (up to many days for T = 108 K). In any case, this is much longer than the characteristic Alfv´en crossing time τA which is usually a few seconds. On the other hand, the smallness of the radiative losses in other astrophysical situations cannot be taken for granted, especially in High-Energy Astrophysics appli- cations, such as coronae of accretion disks around black holes and neutron stars and also gamma-ray bursts. If radiative losses are important, then the above estimates for the central temperature would no longer apply and correspondingly the condition for transition to the fast reconnection regime would have to be modified. Next, going back to the solar corona, we need to con- sider the effect of electron thermal conduction on the central temperature. Note that electrons are still well magnetized throughout most of the reconnection layer (this will be even more so in the presence of a guide field). Therefore, the electron thermal conduction is 2 I would like to add one extra word of caution here. The Sweet -- Parker theory that we are relying on here does not take into account the large variation of the Spitzer resistivity across the layer as the electron temperature increases by a large factor with respect to its relatively low ambient value. This brings in an extra uncertainty into our estimates. highly anisotropic, and so we shall estimate the effects of parallel and perpendicular thermal conduction sepa- rately. We shall start with the heat conduction along the magnetic field. Since we interested in the collisional case, λe,mfp ≪ L, the parallel heat transport is in the diffu- sive regime and can be described by a one-dimensional random walk of electrons along the magnetic field. The characteristic parallel thermal conduction time-scale can then be estimated as τe,cond,k ∼ λe,mfp ve,th (cid:18) L λe,mfp(cid:19)2 = L L ve,th λe,mfp ∼ τAs(cid:18) me βmi(cid:19) L λe,mfp , (13) where τA and β correspond to the reconnecting field B0. Using expression (4), we can write this expression as τe,cond,k ∼ τA L Lc β−1 . (14) In the magnetically-dominated environment of the so- lar corona, where the thermal pressure outside of the reconnection region is small, we expect β ∼ 1; it can conceivably be smaller, but we never expect it to be sig- nificantly higher than 1. Therefore, we estimate that τe,cond,k ≥ τA L Lc . (15) Thus, we see that if we are in the regime of inter- est -- that is, in the expected regime of applicability of the collisional Sweet -- Parker theory, L > Lc, -- then τe,cond,k > τA and hence the energy losses due to parallel electron thermal conduction are not important. A similar line of arguments can be made to show that the characteristic time for perpendicular (across the re- connection layer) electron thermal conduction is in fact automatically always comparable to the Alfv´en cross- ing time. Indeed, the cross-field electron conduction timescale in the Sweet -- Parker regime can be estimated as τe,cond,⊥ = , (16) δ2 SP De,⊥ where De,⊥ ∼ ρ2 e ve,th/λe,mfp is the classical electron collisional diffusivity across the magnetic field. Using βe ∼ 1, we see that τe,cond,⊥ should scale as τe,cond,⊥ ∼ τA δ2 SP d2 i r mi me λe,mfp L . (17) Upon plugging equation (3) into this expression, we im- mediately find that all of the factors on the right-hand- side cancel and we simply see that τe,cond,⊥ ∼ τA , (18) i.e., that the two timescales are automatically compara- ble to each other. Combined with our previous result regarding the ef- fect of the parallel thermal conduction, we conclude that energy losses due to both parallel and perpendic- ular electron thermal conduction out of the layer are, at best, only marginally important in the collisional Sweet -- Parker regime. Heat losses are still present but are not likely to cause a decrease in the central electron temper- ature by more than a factor of order unity. This means 6 D. A. Uzdensky that the jump in the plasma pressure, required to main- tain the pressure balance with the outside reconnecting magnetic field, should be attributed mostly to the in- crease in the plasma temperature (due to Ohmic heat- ing), whereas the density should not vary across the layer by more than a factor of a few. Thus, for our rough es- timates, the density that enters in our estimate (8) for the central temperature can be taken to be the ambi- ent plasma density. As long as we are in the collisional regime, L > Lc, this result is consistent with the energy balance inside the layer that includes Ohmic heating, heat advection by the bulk plasma outflow, and electron thermal transport. As we shall see in the next section, this will be true even in the presence of a guide field. It is also interesting to check that the assumption Ti ≃ In principle, this could Te is not strongly violated. be a worry, since the collisional electron-ion energy- equilibration rate is suppressed by the large mass ratio; hence, in general, the electron and ion temperatures in the layer need not be equal. For example, ions might have been much hotter than the electrons and hence might have provided the bulk of the pressure support against the outside magnetic field. The electron temperature in this case would have been far below the equiparti- tion value (about 107 K). Correspondingly, the electron mean-free path would be much lower than that given by equation (9). The electron-ion temperature equilibration time, τEQ, is by a factor of mi/me longer than the electron colli- sion time, τe. Making use of the the pressure balance cs ∼ (Te/mi)1/2 ∼ VA, we can express τe in terms of λe,mfp and the Alfv´en speed as τe ≃ λe,mfp/ve,th ∼ (λe,mfp/cs)pme/mi ∼ (λe,mfp/VA)pme/mi. Then, we can compare τEQ with the Alfv´en crossing time, which is the characteristic time a a fluid element spends inside the layer: τEQ ∼ τA λe,mfp L r mi me ∼ τA Lc L . (19) Thus we see that, if we are in the collisional regime as defined by equation (4), the electrons and ions experi- ence enough collisions with each other to equalize their temperatures while they transit through the layer. Thus, Ti ≃ Te should be a decent approximation in the Sweet -- Parker regime. Note that the plasma density also enters the collision- less reconnection condition via di. The straight-forward logic of the above picture dictates that this quantity is to be estimated in the collisional regime. However, it is plausible that a corresponding estimate based on the collisionless regime also has some relevance; in this case it is interesting to compare the two. The task of estimat- ing the central ne in the collisionless regime is more diffi- cult than estimating it in the Sweet -- Parker regime, since there are many uncertainties here. However, it is also less important, since most of the strong density dependence in equation (10) comes from the the steep temperature (and hence, indirectly, density) dependence of the Spitzer resistivity. Nevertheless, we still shall try to discuss the question of whether the density can vary significantly across a collisionless reconnection layer. If the fast colli- sionless reconnection is due to anomalous resistivity, then the effective λe,mfp is determined by wave-particle colli- sions and hence will be relatively short. This will result, again, in suppression of parallel electron thermal conduc- tion and hence in high temperature and correspondingly, according to the pressure balance condition (7), in a rela- tively mild density change with respect to the upstream value (see also Uzdensky 2003). Then the above esti- mates are likely to be still valid (although in this case one might have to deal with a possibility that Ti ≫ Te). On the other hand, if the fast reconnection is due to the Hall effect, then we also may expect the density to be roughly uniform across the layer. This is because the ions become demagnetized on scales less than di and hence cannot develop structures on smaller scales. The dynamics of ions inside the reconnection layer can be summarized by noting that they are pulled directly into the layer by the bipolar electric field, which accelerates them up to the Alfv´en speed, and then are ejected out along the layer by the Lorentz force associated with the quadrupole out-of-plane magnetic field (e.g., Uzdensky & Kulsrud 2006). At any rate, one does not expect to see a significant variation of ion, and hence electron, den- sity across the Hall reconnection layer (apart from the di-thick density depletion layers that run along the sep- aratrices, as reported by Shay et al. 2001). I also would like to make a little side remark about my use of terms here. In this paper I use the terms "colli- sional" and "collisionless" a lot and I would like to clarify what I mean by them. Notice that the collisionless re- connection condition (4) is different from the customary usage of the term "collisionless". Often, by "collision- less" one means a regime in which Ωe > νe,i, i.e., when the electron gyro-frequency is faster than the electron-ion collision rate. Equivalently, this means that ρe < λe,mfp. In this paper, on the other hand, the terms "collisional" and "collisionless" involve comparing λe,mfp not with the electron gyro-radius, but instead with the system size L divided by the square root of the ion/electron mass ratio, as seen from (4). Finally, I would like to make a comment about the use of the term "collisionless". As I mentioned in § 1, in the present paper this term is understood in the sense of equation (4). That is, a system is called "collisionless" when λe,mfp & L/40, roughly speaking. This definition is different from the condition λe,mfp > ρe that is of- ten used. Note that, when λe,mfp > ρe, or, equivalently, Ωe > νe,i, then the Hall term in the generalized Ohm law formally cannot be neglected. In plasmas of interest to this paper, e.g., in the solar corona, this condition is al- ways very well satisfied. In this sense, the coronal plasma is definitely always collisionless. Our collisionless recon- nection condition (2), on the other hand, is not always satisfied. In fact, there is a large and astrophysically- important region in parameter space where δSP > di but where the plasma is nevertheless collisionless in the sense that Ωe > νe,i, and where therefore the Hall effect may be significant (see also Cassak et al. 2005). In the above dis- cussion I have assumed that, in this intermediate regime, reconnection still proceeds slowly, in the purely resistive Sweet -- Parker mode, as suggested by numerous resistive- MHD simulations. One should be aware, however, that most of these simulations completely ignore the Hall ef- fect; thus, it is not clear to what extent their results can be relied upon in this intermediate regime. In fact, the recent numerical work by Cassak et al. (2005), who in- Solar Coronal Heating 7 clude both resistivity and Hall effect, indicates that both slow Sweet -- Parker and fast Hall modes may operate in the intermediate regime, depending on the previous his- tory of the system. In particular, they observe that, when one considers a gradual initial thinning of the reconnec- tion layer, the system always stays in the slow regime, even if Ωe > νe,i, as long as δSP > di. Since it is ex- actly this scenario that is of interest in the context of our model, we feel we can use condition (2) with confi- dence. 2.4. Reconnection with a Guide Field In the real world the zero-guide-field case considered in the previous section is rare. It may be encountered in some special circumstances; for example it may be rele- vant to reconnection in the Earth magnetotail. Gener- ally, however, there is some guide field, Bz 6= 0, present. This is especially so in the context of the nanoflare model for heating of solar coronal loops by braiding of individ- ual elemental flux strands that comprise a larger loop. In this case the guide field (i.e., the axial field along the general loop direction) is always present and is generally much stronger than the reconnecting field B0. Another situation where guide field is dominant over the recon- necting magnetic field is laboratory plasma devices, such as tokamaks. Note that reconnection releases the energy of the weaker B0-field; the energy of the guide field is not available. However, the presence of a guide field, especially if it is strong, may, in principle, change the structure of the reconnection layer. Therefore, in this section we consider the effect of the guide field on our collisionless reconnection condition. The presence of the guide field modifies the collision- less reconnection condition. This is because, whereas the characteristic layer thickness in resistive MHD is not af- fected by the guide field and is still given by the same Sweet -- Parker scaling (1), the characteristic scale for col- lisionless reconnection layer changes. In particular, ac- cording to the published literature (e.g., Kleva et al. 1995; Rogers et al. 2001; Cassak et al. 2007), the layer thickness for Hall collisionless reconnection becomes the ion acoustic Larmor radius, ρs ∼ cs/Ωi, where Ωi corre- sponds to the total upstream magnetic field and where cs ∼ (Te/mi)1/2 is the ion-acoustic speed. This result has been recently confirmed experimentally (Egedal et al. 2007). Then, the criterion for the onset of fast reconnec- tion in the Hall-MHD regime becomes (e.g., Cassak et al. 2007) δSP < ρs . (20) According to the general scheme presented in the pre- ceding section, we first need to consider the Sweet-Parker layer. Again, we want to estimate the value of the Spitzer resistivity at the center of the reconnection layer. There- fore, we need to determine the central electron temper- ature. One of the difficulties here is that, if there is a guide field, then the cross-layer force-balance in the form of equation (7) is no longer applicable. This is because the pressure of the reconnecting component of the out- side magnetic field, B2 0 /8π, no longer has to be balanced at the center of the layer by the plasma pressure alone. It can be partially balanced by an increase in the guide field pressure due to a modest compression. In particular, a very strong guide field, Bz ≫ B0, dominates the pressure both inside and outside of the current layer and can be changed only slightly. Therefore, it essentially ensures incompressibility: nin ≃ nout. The temperature then decouples from the pressure balance and has to be deter- mined from some other considerations, namely, from the energy equation. Fortunately, most of the analysis pre- sented in the previous section can be carried over to the strong-guide-field case without much change. In partic- ular, the plasma experiences Joule heating as it travels through the layer and, as long as one is in the collisional regime, the parallel electron thermal conduction is not able to cool the layer by a large factor. Therefore, we ex- pect the temperature inside the layer to increase roughly to the equipartition level given by equation (8). However, this equation can no longer be regarded as equality, but just as a rough estimate. For the purposes of this paper, though, this is good enough. Now, let us discuss the right-hand side of condi- tion (20). If the guide field is not very large compared with the reconnecting field, then one expects ρs ∼ di, and hence the criterion (2) is not changed substantially. However, in the strong-guide-field case, we expect to have ρs ≪ di (assuming, as we always do throughout this pa- per, that upstream β ≪ 1). Then, the criterion for tran- sition to fast collisionless Hall reconnection is modified structurally. It now becomes δSP < ρs ∼ di (cid:18) 8πneTe z (cid:19)1/2 B2 ∼ di β1/2 e B0 Bz , (21) where βe is based on the central electron temperature Te and density and on the upstream reconnecting field com- ponent B0. Note that, according to logic of our paper, this βe is to be estimated in the collisional regime. Nev- ertheless, it may also be useful to get some feeling for what βe (and hence ρs) should be immediately after the transition to fast reconnection. As we noted above, a strong guide field makes the plasma nearly incompress- ible, so that ne is roughly uniform. The question then is what one should take for the electron temperature in- side the layer? There is a considerable uncertainty here. In particular, there is no good reason for Ti to be close to Te in the collisionless regime. For example, Hsu et al. (2001) present experimental evidence for strong ion heat- ing Ti ≫ Te inside a collisionless reconnection layer in the no-guide-field case in the MRX, although the rise in Ti is considerably smaller in the presence of a guide field. In any case, with all these reservations, the simplest ap- proach one can adopt is to take βe ∼ 1 in the above expression. Then, the condition for fast collisionless re- connection in the strong guide field case becomes δSP ρs ∼(cid:18) L λe,mfp(cid:19)1/2 (cid:18) me mi(cid:19)1/4 Bz B0 < 1 , (22) which, after our usual manipulations, can be rewritten as L < Lc(Bz) =r mi me Bz(cid:19)2 λe,mfp (cid:18) B0 Bz(cid:19)2 1.5(cid:18) B0 10 B4 ≃ 6 · 109 cm n−3 (23) Thus, the critical global length Lc in this case becomes 8 D. A. Uzdensky smaller by a factor (Bz/B0)2 and so the collisionless re- connection condition is harder to satisfy. Also note that, for fixed ne and Bz, Lc becomes very sensitive to the reconnecting field component: Lc ∼ B6 0. 2.5. Caveats and Alternatives With all the above said, there are still many caveats and alternative ideas that may potentially alter the above picture. It is important to be aware of them and try to gage their effect on the existence and the form of the fast collisionless reconnection condition. I will discuss some of them in this section. First, there are a number of ideas that may, if cor- rect, represent a potential challenge to our Conclusion II (that collisional resistive-MHD reconnection is slow). For example, Lazarian & Vishniac (1999) suggested that re- connection may be relatively rapid in pure resistive MHD in the presence of externally imposed three-dimensional MHD turbulence (see, however, Kim & Diamond 2001 for a dissenting view). As far as I know, this idea has not yet been tested in three-dimensional (3D) numeri- cal simulations, although it is definitely an interesting possibility that deserves further study. Such studies are indeed already underway (Vishniac 2007, private com- munication). Furthermore, even in the two-dimensional case, resistive-MHD Sweet -- Parker-like current layer may become unstable to tearing instability when its aspect ratio exceeds a certain large number (probably a hun- dred) (Bulanov et al. 1978; Forbes & Priest 1983; Biskamp 1986; Lee & Fu 1986; Malyshkin 2005, private communication; Loureiro et al. 2007). Tearing may effec- tively result in an enhanced hyper-resistivity that would dominate over the normal resistivity (e.g., Strauss 1988). What will be the effect of the nonlinear development of this instability on the overall reconnection rate is still not clear. In addition, Dahlburg et al. (1992) identified a mechanism, based on a secondary ideal-MHD instability, that leads to the excitation of fully three-dimensional tur- bulence within a reconnecting current layer. Finally, in a recent numerical simulation with both uniform resistivity and Hall effect, Cassak et al. (2005) observed an interest- ing hysteresis phenomenon: as the resistivity was turned down, there was a transition from slow Sweet -- Parker to fast Hall reconnection, in accordance with condition (2). However, as the resistivity was turned back up to a level higher than that corresponding to (2), the system still stayed in the fast mode. This puzzling behavior needs to be investigated further. Second, there are recent studies relevant to Conclu- sion III (that collisionless reconnection is fast). In par- ticular, even though most of the authors agree that Hall reconnection is much faster than Sweet -- Parker, there is still a significant disagreement about exactly how fast it actually is. For example, Drake and his collaborators report a universal reconnection rate of about 0.1 VA, independent of the electron microphysics that is ul- timately responsible for breaking the field lines (e.g., Biskamp et al. 1997; Shay et al. 1998, 1999, 2001; Cas- sak et al. 2005; see also Birn et al. 2001). On the other hand, others argue that it should not be universal but should instead be a function of the system parameters, such as the electron/ion mass ratio (e.g., Bhattacharjee et al. 2001). In addition, Daughton et al. (2006) re- cently raised a concern about the validity of periodic boundary conditions used in the majority of previous numerical studies. In particular, they argued that the reported very high reconnection rate may be an arti- fact of such boundary conditions. Furthermore, they performed 2D particle simulations with the appropriate open boundary conditions and observed that, after an initial transient peak consistent with the high value re- ported by Shay et al. (1999, 2001), the reconnection rate went down and settled at a significantly lower level (Daughton et al. 2006). Similar conclusions were reached independently by Fujimoto (2006) using periodic 2D par- ticle simulations but in a very large. After a year-long debate, however, this controversy finally seems to have been resolved. It is now agreed by both sides that the electron dissipation region develops a two-scale structure with an extended high-velocity electron jet in the outflow direction; however, the dimensionless reconnection rate still remains high (vrec/VA ≫ di/L), although perhaps not quite as high as previously believed (e.g., Shay et al. 2007; Karimabadi et al. 2007). Finally, I would like to mention that the picture pre- sented in the above two sections, implies certain physi- cal conditions and thus is not expected to be universally valid in all astrophysical environments. For example, in the case of weakly-ionized plasma in molecular clouds (e.g., in the context of star formation), reconnection dy- namics is strongly modified by recombination processes and may become significantly faster than Sweet -- Parker even in the collisional regime (Zweibel 1989; Heitsch & Zweibel 2003). Also, in the case of reconnection of super-strong magnetic fields in magnetar magneto- spheres (B0 & 1014 G), the density of the released mag- netic energy is so large that the pressure inside the layer is dominated by radiation. The resulting temperature is so high that a large number of electron-positron pairs is produced; this means that the number of particles is not conserved, and so the above estimates would have to be modified (see, e.g., Thompson 1994; Lyutikov & Uzdensky 2003; Uzdensky & MacFadyen 2006). Other issues that are worth-mentioning and that may substantially complicate the simple physical picture pre- sented in this paper are: impulsive, bursty reconnection (e.g., Bhattacharjee et al. 1999; Bhattacharjee 2001; Daughton et al. 2006, 2007, in preparation); and recon- nection in three dimensions (e.g., Longcope 1996). 3. SOLAR CORONAL HEATING AS A SELF-REGULATED PROCESS 3.1. General Picture The physical picture presented in this paper has a num- ber of interesting implications for the solar corona that I will discuss in this section. At the present, the theory of magnetic reconnection has not yet reached the level of maturity that would al- low us to make accurate predictions regarding when the transition between the slow and fast reconnection modes will occur. Moreover, there is still no consensus on the exact nature of the fast collisionless reconnection mecha- nism and on the actual scalings of the reconnection rate in either fast or slow reconnection (see section § 2.5 for more discussion). However, what is important for us in this paper is just the sole fact of existence of such a tran- sition and that it has to do with the plasma collisionality. The transition doesn't actually have to be razor-sharp, Solar Coronal Heating 9 and in reality there may be not two but more different regimes with different reconnection rates and hence more than one such transition. Also, the transition condition may depend on other physical parameters, such as the presence of a guide field (see § 2.4) or, perhaps, the ef- fectiveness of radiative cooling, which we have omitted in this paper. Whatever the case, the existence of two reconnection regimes with a collisionality-related transi- tion between them is a very important fact and we would like to exploit it in various astrophysical applications. In this section, I will apply this condition [namely, eqs. (4) and (10)] to the problem of solar coronal heating. I propose that coronal heating is a self-regulating pro- cess that works to keep the corona marginally collision- less, in the sense of equations (2) and (4) (see also Uz- densky 2006, 2007). According to Parker's nanoflare theory (Parker 1972, 1983, 1988), as long as the twisting and braiding of coro- nal loops by photospheric footpoint motions and flux emergence episodes keep producing thin current sheets in the corona (e.g., van Ballegooijen 1986), magnetic dis- sipation in these current sheets leads to continuous coro- nal heating. In reality, this heating, of course, is not uniformly distributed; it is instead strongly intermittent, localized in both space and time (Rosner et al. 1978; hereafter RTV78). This basic picture of coronal heating has been shown to work in several 3D MHD numerical simulations (e.g., Galsgaard & Nordlund 1996; Hendrix et al. 1996; Gudiksen & Nordlund 2002, 2005). Now, the overall, integrated heating density, i.e., the rate of magnetic dissipation per unit volume, depends on the reconnection rate in these sheets, e.g., on whether reconnection is fast (e.g., Petschek) or slow (Sweet -- Parker). This is actually a rather subtle point. Indeed, in a steady state, the energy dissipated in the corona per unit time should be equal to the power pumped into the corona magnetically from the solar surface. And it is not obvious why and how the energy-pumping rate de- pends on what happens in the corona. For example, if the corona were enclosed in a fixed volume, then the en- ergy dissipation per unit volume would be fixed (as in driven MHD turbulence in a box). However, it is impor- tant to recognize that the coronal volume is not fixed! If, for example, reconnection were to suddenly slow down, then more energy would be pumped in than the corona could dissipate; then, in order to accommodate this ad- ditional free magnetic energy, the corona would respond by increasing its scale-height. That is, coronal magnetic structures would grow in height until, finally, the total dissipation in the corona became equal to the total input from the photosphere. Because of the increased volume, the magnetic dissipation per unit volume is decreased. In addition, as coronal magnetic structures grow in height, especially when H & R⊙, the amount of energy pumped into the corona by the footpoint motions may go down. This is because the work done by footpoint mo- tions is proportional to vfp·BhorBvert/4π. As the coronal structures grow in height without increasing their lateral size, the horizontal field, Bhor, decreases, whereas the vertical field component, Bvert, does not change. Corre- spondingly, the overall power pumped from the photo- sphere into the corona goes down. As follows from equation (10), the reconnection mode is determined by the global scale L of the reconnection layer and by the basic physical parameters characteriz- ing the plasma in the layer (i.e, ne, Te, and B0). The typical values of L and B0 are determined by the scale and strength of the magnetic structures emerging from the Sun and by the scale of footpoint motions (e.g., the meso-granular scale). Therefore, for the purposes of the present discussion, I will regard L and B0 as fixed and then ask what determines the coronal density and tem- perature. Following this line of reasoning, let us invert equa- tion (10) and view it as the condition for the plasma density. That is, let us introduce a scale-dependent crit- ical density, nc, below which the reconnection process transitions from the slow collisional Sweet -- Parker regime to a fast collisionless regime: nc(Bz . B0) ∼ 2 · 1010 cm−3 B4/3 1.5 L−1/3 9 , (24) where L9 is the global reconnection layer length ex- pressed in units of 104 km. In the strong-guide-field case, Bz ≫ B0, the corresponding expression becomes: nc(Bz ≫ B0) ∼ 2 · 1010 cm−3 B4/3 1.5 L−1/3 9 Bz(cid:19)2/3 (cid:18) B0 . (25) It is interesting to note that these values are close to those observed in active solar corona. I suggest that this is not a pure coincidence. The reason for this is that there is an important feed- back between coronal energy release and the coronal den- sity. This feedback is due to the fact that the gas high in the corona actually comes from evaporation from the surface along the field lines that just underwent recon- nection. In fact, it is essential to consider the coronal heating not only as the process of increasing the coro- nal plasma's temperature, but also as that of increas- ing its density (e.g., Klimchuk 2006; Aschwanden et al. 2007). Indeed, a part of the energy released in a re- connection event is rapidly conducted along the field by fast (perhaps, nonthermal) electrons to the surface and is deposited in a denser photospheric and chromospheric plasma. This leads to a localized heating at the foot- points of the post-reconnected magnetic loops and to a subsequent chromospheric evaporation along them, a well-documented phenomenon in solar corona (e.g., As- chwanden et al. 2001a,b and Klimchuk 2006; see, how- ever, Brown et al. 2000 and Aschwanden et al. 2007 for an evidence that chromospheric evaporation occurs in response to chromospheric, rather than coronal, heat- ing events). As a result, these loops become filled with a dense and hot plasma. The density rises and may now ex- ceed nc. This will shut off any further reconnection (and hence heating) involving these post-reconnective loops until they again cool down, which occurs on a longer, radiative timescale. Let us consider a couple of examples of how this might work. First, let us consider the case when the plasma density is relatively high and so the radiative cooling time, τrad, is relatively short compared with the timescale on which the coronal magnetic structures change due to footpoint motions, τfp; however, it is of course still long compared with the fast reconnection timescale. The op- posite limiting case will be discussed later in this section. Let us suppose that due to field-line twisting, a recon- 10 D. A. Uzdensky necting structure is set up in the corona at t = 0. Let this structure be characterized by the current sheet length L and the reconnecting field component B0. Furthermore, let us further suppose that, initially, the ambient density of the background plasma is higher than nc(L, B0). Then the reconnection layer is collisional and reconnection pro- ceeds very slowly, in the Sweet -- Parker mode. That is, there is almost no reconnection at all and hence coronal heating is weak. The surrounding plasma gradually cools by radiation (and also, in general, by thermal conduc- tion) and the pressure scale height gradually goes down. The gas gradually precipitates to the surface. Then the density of the plasma entering the layer decreases and at some point becomes lower than the critical density. The reconnection process then suddenly switches to the col- lisionless regime. Petschek-like fast reconnection ensues, and the rate of magnetic energy dissipation greatly in- creases. A flare commences. Some fraction of the energy released by reconnection is transported by the electron conduction along the reconnected field lines down to the base, where it is deposited in the much denser photo- spheric or chromospheric plasma. This in turn leads to a massive evaporation along the same field lines. As a result, the newly-reconnected loops are now populated with relatively dense and hot plasma. They cool down only slowly via conduction and radiation losses, keeping their relatively high density for an appreciable length of time. If, during this time, these loops become twisted or somehow get in contact with other loops, they are now not likely to reconnect rapidly, since their plasma density is above critical. This inhibits further coronal heating in the given region. In fact, we can speculate that for any further outbursts of coronal activity in the given region to occur, one has to wait for the gas in post-reconnective loops to cool down significantly, which occurs on a longer, radiative timescale. Thus we see that, although highly intermittent and in- homogeneous, the corona is working to keep itself roughly at about the height-dependent critical density given by equation (24) or (25). Correspondingly, the background coronal temperature should be such that results in a density scale-height that is just large enough to popu- late the corona up to the critical density level at a given height. In this sense, coronal heating regulates itself (Uz- densky 2006, 2007). An important remark is that loop brightness in soft x-rays and UV does not necessarily mean that this loop is actively undergoing fast reconnection at the given mo- ment of time. Instead, it just reflects the fact that the loop has a high plasma density (since radiation intensity is proportional to n2). This implies an episode of strong evaporation from the surface in the recent past, presum- ably caused by a preceding fast-reconnection coronal en- ergy release in this loop. The nearby coronal regions that are darker have evidently lower density, and they would be ripe for reconnection from the point of view of the collisionless reconnection condition. However, they probably are filled with a magnetic field that does not have complex topology with current sheets, since the un- derlying reason for coronal activity is always the genera- tion of small coronal current sheets as a result of field-line braiding driven by a complicated pattern of the footpoint motions on the solar surface. The above radiative-cooling-dominated scenario was presented here first only because it brings out more clearly the role that plasma density plays in controlling the reconnection regime. It also highlights the role of chromospheric evaporation in controlling the plasma den- sity. However, there is an alternative version of this pic- ture corresponding to the opposite situation, τfp < τrad. In this case one can repeat the same arguments as those given above but instead of the slow initial evolution of the plasma density due to gradual radiative cooling, one can invoke the slow evolution of the reconnecting mag- netic field strength caused by the motion of the loop foot- points (as was described by Cassak et al. 2006). In other words, one can regard the ambient plasma density n as fixed on the timescale of interest, whereas the reconnect- ing field component B0 gradually increases (for simplicity we also keep L fixed). Then, the current sheet gradually builds up, while staying in the Sweet -- Parker mode, and then rapidly switches over to the fast collisionless mode once B0 has exceeded a certain threshold. This scenario is in fact closer in spirit to the original Parker nanoflare model (Parker 1983, 1988), and also to the discussion by Cassak et al. (2005, 2006). Instead of defining nc(L, B0), one can just as well rewrite the fast reconnection con- dition in terms of a critical current-sheet strength, i.e., the critical reconnecting magnetic field component, Bc, expressed as a function of L and n: Bc(n, L) ≃ 20 G L1/4 9 n3/4 10 . (26) In the case of a strong guide field, Bz ≫ B0, the critical reconnecting field is Bc(n, L, Bz) ≃ 30 G L1/6 9 n1/2 10 B1/3 z,2 . (27) where Bz,2 ≡ Bz/(100 G). As I will show below, in the long run one can ex- pect some sort of statistical steady state with τfp ∼ τrad. Then, this second scenario is just as likely to take place as the first one. In fact, in reality they probably both occur alongside each other. I would like to emphasize that the phenomenon de- scribed in the first part of this paper (i.e., the transition from slow to fast collisionless reconnection) is not the whole coronal heating story, although, in my view, it is an important part of it. Conceptually, it is probably about one quarter of the whole story. The other impor- tant pieces of the puzzle are: (i) complex dynamic inter- action of a large number of coronal magnetic loops, ulti- mately responsible for the generation of current sheets in the corona by footpoint motions; this requires the development of an appropriate statistical description of loops (e.g., Uzdensky & Goodman 2007, in preparation); (ii) chromospheric evaporation following a reconnection event and motions of plasma along the loop; and (iii) ra- diative (and thermal-conduction) energy losses and the resulting precipitation of the material back to the so- lar surface. All these essential physics ingredients (or at least some effective representation of them) will even- tually have to be incorporated into a single comprehen- sive theoretical (probably numerical) model of the solar corona. It is important to note that each of these processes comes with its own characteristic timescale. The recon- nection time in the fast regime, τrec, is very short. For the Solar Coronal Heating 11 purposes of our discussion, we shall regard it as instanta- neous. The characteristic time for material evaporation following a nanoflare is also relatively short. The two longer time-scales in the problem are the characteristic timescale for generation and growth of new current sheets by photospheric footpoint motions, τfp, and the radiative cooling timescale τrad. As we shall show below, the sys- tem tends to adjust itself to a statistical equilibrium in which these two timescales are comparable (of order one hour in the solar corona). Finally, the longest time scale of all is the Sweet -- Parker reconnection time. It is much longer than one hour, and is therefore irrelevant in our problem. That is, the energy release during the Sweet -- Parker phase is not important. However, this does not mean that the existence of the slow Sweet -- Parker regime is not important; it is in fact extremely important, since it allows for a strong current sheet to build up, accumu- lating a large amount of free magnetic energy. This discussion brings us to one of the most interesting issues in solar coronal heating -- intermittency. The key questions here are: what is the distribution of (spatial, temporal, and energy) scales on which magnetic dissipa- tion occurs? what scales are responsible for most of the energy release? In my opinion, the collisionless reconnec- tion condition is, at the end of the day, very important for answering these questions. In particular, I think this condition plays a key role in establishing the spectrum of the energy release events, e.g., the observed power-law distribution of flare energies. 3.2. Long-term Evolution of a Coronal Loop To illustrate the above points, let us consider the fol- lowing model problem. One can raise the question of whether the self-regulating behavior of the nonlinear dy- namical system described above can exhibit an oscilla- tory behavior (Parker 2006, private communication), es- pecially in light of a hysteresis-like phenomenon reported by Cassak et al. (2005). Of course, in general this issue is difficult to assess within the present model, since it first needs to be incorporated in the overall multi-loop dynamics (e.g., Uzdensky & Goodman 2007, in prepara- tion); that is, the energy release in a given fast recon- nection event does not, strictly speaking, directly affect the reconnection process that produced it. However, it does lead both to relaxation of the magnetic stress and also, importantly, to the increase in density in the post- reconnected flux tube (or more precisely, in the elemen- tary magnetic thread within the larger flux tube). This will in turn temporarily inhibit any reconnection involv- ing this given field thread even if a new current sheet is formed. This inhibition will last for some time un- til either the plasma density goes down because of the radiative cooling or the reconnecting field component in the new current sheet grows to a larger strength. Let us consider a simple illustrative example that demonstrates this oscillatory behavior and the secular evolution of the system on a longer timescale. Consider a composite coronal flux tube, initially filled with a rela- tively low plasma density n. For simplicity, let us imagine that that this tube consists of two separate elementary flux threads that are being wrapped around each other steadily by the sheared photospheric motions. Conse- quently, a current sheet gradually builds up inside the tube, in the spirit of the nanoflare model. Again for simplicity, let us assume that the length L of this cur- rent sheet and the axial magnetic field strength Bz in the tube stay constant at all times. Then, as the ele- mental flux threads are wrapped around each other, the reconnecting field component, B0, gradually increases. Because the plasma density is low, the radiative cooling time is relatively long and therefore we can regard the plasma density constant during this phase. On the other hand, also because the density is low, the critical field strength is also low, according to equation (27). That is, the current sheet will become collisionless relatively early, at some small value of B0. Correspondingly, the amount of free magnetic energy attributed to the current sheet at that moment will also be small and the resulting reconnection event will be relatively weak. After the re- connection event, the magnetic field becomes unwrapped again (almost completely, since the hysteresis behavior reported by Cassak et al. 2005, 2007 implies that fast reconnection proceeds to the end); then the footpoint- driven process of current-sheet build-up starts all over again. Now, if the plasma density in the tube under consideration were fixed at a constant small value ne, then (since L and Bz are also kept fixed) all the sub- sequent fast reconnection events would be triggered at the same critical value of B0 = Bc(n, L, Bz). Corre- spondingly, they would all be characterized by a rel- atively small amount of energy released, on the order of V B2 c (ne, L, Bz)/8π, where V is the volume of the re- gion involved in the given reconnection event. At the same time, since weaker current sheets are easier to pro- duce, there would be following each other at a relatively rapid rate. However, because of the mass exchange between the surface of the Sun and the corona, the ambient density is not fixed a priori. In particular, if one starts with a small initial density, the first few reconnection events will be energetically small, but, nevertheless, they will eventually lead to an increase in the plasma density via chromospheric evaporation. This will make the critical magnetic field stronger and hence the amount of free energy stored between reconnection events and released through them larger. At the same time, such events will be more rare, since it takes longer to build up a stronger current sheet. Therefore, an increase in plasma density shifts the dominant energy-release scale towards larger energies. Thus, in this picture, the plasma density in the tube increased over time in a step-like manner: it increases by a certain amount in the aftermath of each reconnection event and stays roughly flat between them. The amount of plasma pumped into the corona as a re- sult of each event is roughly speaking proportional to the magnetic energy released in this event. The latter is in turn a monotonically-increasing function of density, ac- cording to equation (27). That is, we have, keeping L and Bz fixed: δn ∼ B2 c (n) ∼ n. Thus, the relative in- crease is then independent of density; it can be roughly estimated as follows. Consider a loop of constant cross- sectional area L2 and length Lk > L; the loop's volume is then Vloop ∼ Lk L2. Assuming that the reconnection layer extends all the way along the loop, the volume V of the region involved in the reconnection event is sim- ilar: V ∼ Vloop ∼ Lk L2. Then, the magnetic energy released in the event is of order Erec ∼ (B2 0 /8π) Lk L2. 12 D. A. Uzdensky Next, let us say that a certain fraction ǫ < 1 of this energy goes towards filling the entire loop with plasma evaporated from the surface. The coefficient ǫ depends on the portion of the released energy that goes to the energetic electrons and is transported by them to the photosphere, times the fraction of this deposited energy that goes to material evaporation (as opposed to that im- mediately radiated away from the footpoints). Overall, ǫ describes the fraction of the flare energy that eventually will be radiated by post-coronal loops as soft X-rays, UV, etc., but not hard X-rays. Immediately after the evapo- ration episode, the energy ǫErec is divided between the increase in the gravitational energy, δEgrav, and in the thermal energy, δEth ≃ 3 δn kBTloopVloop, of the coronal- loop plasma (for simplicity of discussion, I dropped the contribution to δEth associated with the increase in the gas temperature; in reality, of course, both n and Tloop should increase together). If the height of the loop is larger than the density scale-height, then these two con- tributions are likely to be comparable, according to the virial theorem. However, in the case of a compact loop, whose height is less than the thermal scale-height, the thermal energy increase will be larger than δEgrav. In either case, we expect δEth ∼ ǫErec, from which we im- mediately find δn n ∼ ǫ B2 c 8π 1 3nkBTloop = 2ǫ 3 βloop , (28) where βloop ≡ 16π nkBTloop/B2 is the characteristic c plasma-beta based on the critical reconnecting field. Substituting the expression (27) for Bc, we get c,1.5 ∼ 0.07 Tloop,6 B−2/3 βloop ≃ 0.07 n10 Tloop,6 B−2 z,2 L−1/3 , (29) 9 and so δn n ∼ 10 ǫ T −1 loop,6 B2/3 z,2 L1/3 9 . (30) There are also numerical factors of order unity which we have ignored. It is reasonable to expect that this ratio should be roughly of order unity. For now let us just assume that it is not large, i.e., δn/n . 1. As mentioned above, in a realistic scenario the loop temperature should also increase at each step, in concert with the density. This means that, to get into the coronal loop, chromospheric gas would need to be heated to a temperature that is higher than at the previous step. Then, each erg of the released energy would be able to lift a smaller amount of gas, i.e., the evaporation efficiency of coronal heating would decrease over time. To illustrate this point, let us, for example, adopt the famous RTV scaling for the loop temperature (RTV78), even though it was derived assuming steady heating and thus is not valid for the impulsive situation considered here (see below for more discussion). Recasting the RTV78 scaling in terms of the electron density instead of the pressure, we write T RTV k,9 . Substituting this into equation (30), we get loop ≃ 3 · 106 K n1/2 10 L1/2 δn n ∼ 3 ǫ n−1/2 10 B2/3 z,2 L1/3 9 L−1/2 k,9 ∼ n−1/2 . (31) Next, the time separation between the steps also in- creases with the increased threshold magnetic field. In particular, let us assume that the footpoint driving twists up the field lines and thus creates and then strength- ens current sheets (or perhaps, quasi-separatrix lay- ers, see, e.g., Galsgaard & Nordlund 1996; Titov & Hornig 2002) at some constant rate. This is, of course, an over-simplification. In reality, current sheets may be created as a consequence of the nonlinear develop- ment of kink-like instabilities of twisted magnetic loops (Dahlburg et al. 2005). Then, the growth of B0 with time is not likely to be a smooth function, but instead may involve sudden jumps. Here, however, we would like to avoid such complications. Thus, let us consider, as an illustration, a simple model in which the reconnecting field component increases linearly between reconnection events, dB0 dt = γBz , (32) where γ = const. Then, using equation (27), the time δt it takes the reconnecting field to grow a given critical value Bc(n) (after a complete relaxation during the pre- ceding reconnection event) is δt = γ−1Bc(n)/Bz ∼ n1/2. Therefore, as long as the relative increase in density at each step is not large, the long-term (t ≫ δt) evolution of the system can approximately be described by a dif- ferential equation: dn dt ∼ δn(n) δt(n) ∼ const , (33) corresponding to a linear rise n(t) ∼ t. Accordingly, the emission measure of the loop should increase as t2. [Al- ternatively, if we neglect the evolution of the loop tem- perature in the above analysis and instead keep Tloop = constant, we then get δn ∼ n and hence n(t) ∼ t2, with the emission measure rising as t4.] This growth will continue until one of the following two processes will intervene. First, it may happen, as the density builds up, the critical value of B0 will become so large (e.g., a sizable fraction of Bz), that the equilibrium shape of the entire loop will be affected. For example, the loop may become external-kink-unstable and become helical (sigmoidal loop), which with further twisting may result in a large-scale disruption with a catastrophic en- ergy release, a large flare. This scenario, by the way, sug- gests that coronal loops should gradually (on the time scale of hours) brighten up before a major disruption, because a higher plasma density (manifested as a higher emission measure) leads to a higher critical field strength and hence allows a larger amount of free magnetic energy to be accumulated without being prematurely dissipated via smaller reconnection events. On the other hand, there is another, less violent out- come that is also possible. Indeed, so far we have been ne- glecting radiative cooling. However, as the plasma den- sity gradually builds up due to a series of chromospheric evaporations caused by reconnection events, the radia- tive cooling time decreases (as n−1). At the same time, as we have seen above, the time interval between subse- quent reconnections becomes longer and longer. Eventu- ally, a point may be reached when the amount of plasma precipitated during δt will become equal to the amount of material injected into the loop during an evaporation episode. After that point, there will be no further net Solar Coronal Heating 13 secular change in the coronal density; the system will attain a stable limit cycle behavior. To evaluate the ex- act conditions characterizing this state one will need to calculate the amount of material evaporated following a given small flare and the rate at which the plasma returns to the photosphere as a result of gradual cooling. This would require a detailed model of the thermal structure along loop (e.g., along the lines of RTV78), but this can (and should!) definitely be done. For now, however, we just want to get some qualitative feeling. Therefore, we shall just say, tentatively, that the system enters this sta- ble cyclic regime (with no secular density gain) when the radiative cooling time becomes equal to the time between reconnection events. This yields the following condition: δt(n) = γ−1 Bc(n) Bz = τrad(n) . (34) This equation can now be viewed as a condition that determines the long-term equilibrium plasma density in- side the loop, n∗. Substituting equation (12) for the radiative cooling time and equation (27) for Bc, we ob- tain n∗ as a function of the loop temperature Tloop, γ, L, and Bz: n∗ ≃ 2 · 1010 cm−3 B4/9 z,2 L−1/9 9 (γτrad,0)2/3(cid:18) Tloop,6 Q−22 (cid:19)2/3 , (35) where Q−22 ≡ Q(Tloop)/(10−22 erg cm3 s−1) and where for convenience we defined τrad,0 as the radiative cool- ing time corresponding to n10 = 1, Tloop = 1 MK, and Q−22 = 1: τrad,0 ≃ 400 sec. Correspondingly, the characteristic threshold recon- necting magnetic field is B0,∗ = Bc(n∗, L, Bz) ≃ 45 G L1/9 9 B5/9 z,2 (γτrad,0)1/3(cid:18) Tloop,6 Q−22 (cid:19)1/3 ,(36) and the characteristic time interval between subsequent reconnection events is ∆t∗ = τrad(n∗) ≃ 200 sec B−4/9 z,2 L1/9 9 (γτrad,0)−2/3(cid:18) Tloop,6 Q−22 (cid:19)1/3 ,(37) The characteristic amount of energy released in each reconnection event comprising the limit cycle is E∗ ≃ Lk L2 B2 0,∗ 8π ≃ 8 · 1028 erg × × Lk,9 L2+2/9 9 B10/9 z,2 (γτrad,0)2/3(cid:18) Tloop,6 Q−22 (cid:19)2/3 ,(38) and hence the time-averaged rate of magnetic dissipation in the loop is H∗ = E∗ ∆t∗ ≃ 4 · 1026 erg sec−1 × × Lk,9 L2+1/9 9 B14/9 z,2 (γτrad,0)4/3(cid:18) Tloop,6 Q−22 (cid:19)1/3 ,(39) Note that most of the above parameters have weak dependence on L, except for E∗ and H∗, whose strong L- dependence is almost entirely due to the volume involved. To make any further progress, we need two more rela- tionships: (1) the cooling function Q(T ) and (2) a scal- ing for the loop temperature Tloop. Note that both are subject to significant uncertainties. In particular, the ra- diative cooling function exhibits a complicated behavior in the relevant temperature range (1-10 MK); for exam- ple, according to Cook et al. (1989), it decreases sharply between T = 1 MK and T = 3 MK, and then stays nearly flat for T > 3 MK. Therefore, in principle, one should not expect simple power-law scalings to result at all. Furthermore, there are still significant disagreements in the literature regarding Q(T ) (e.g., Raymond et al. 1976; Raymond & Smith 1977; RTV78; Cook et al. 1989; Landi & Landini 1999; Aschwanden et al. 2000a). For these reasons, any realistic quantitative analysis of ra- diative cooling in the context of the present model is a highly non-trivial task, adding even more ambiguity to this already complicated picture. Getting into such a high level of sophistication and detail would exceed the overall level of accuracy of our model. We shall therefore leave it for a future study. In addition to the cooling function, we need an ex- pression for the loop temperature, Tloop, which strongly affects plasma cooling, in terms of the other loop parame- ters. In principle, the temperature, or, more generally, its distribution along the loop, is determined by the hydro- static balance in conjunction with the energy transport along the loop, which includes thermal conduction, ra- diative losses, and distributed heating. Such an analysis has been first performed by RTV78 for the simplest case of uniform and steady heating; as a result, they derived the famous RTV scaling for the loop-top temperature: T RTV loop = 1.4 · 103(pLk)1/3, where p is the loop pressure and Lk is its length (which is different and usually larger than our current-sheet length L; in our model, we shall regard it as constant). Now, it is true that there is a lot of disagreement in the modern literature regadring the applicability of the RTV scaling to the real solar corona and the observational support is doubtful (e.g., Porter & Klimchuk 1995; Cargill et al. 1995; Kano & Tsuneta 1995; Aschwanden et al. 2000b,2001a). This is not sur- prising taking into account that the RTV scaling was de- rived assuming stationary and uniform heating, and thus ignored the impulsive and intermittent nature of coronal energy dissipation (which is an intrinsic property of my model). In addition, to develop their theory, RTV78 re- lied on an old cooling function due to Raymond (see be- low), whereas somewhat different cooling functions have been used in recent years (Cook et al. 1989; Landi & Landini 1999; Aschwanden et al. 2000a). Nevertheless, despite its significant limitations, the RTV scaling has been highly influential in solar physics. It is still a highly-respected common standard, against which solar physicists often measure their theories and observations. Therefore, just to present an illustrative example, let us now combine the RTV scaling with our model. First, to be consistent, we need to adopt the cooling function due to Raymond (Raymond et al. 1976; 14 D. A. Uzdensky Raymond & Smith 1977) that was used by RTV78:3 QRTV(T ) ≃ 2 · 10−22 T −2/3 6 erg cm3 s−1 , (40) applicable for 2 -- 10 MK (see Appendix A of RTV78). Substituting this function into scalings (35) -- (39), we get 9 T 10/9 loop,6 (γτrad,0)2/3 , z,2 L−1/9 9 T 5/9 z,2 L1/9 n∗ ≃ 1010 cm−3 B4/9 B0,∗ ≃ 40 G B5/9 z,2 L1/9 loop,6 (γτrad,0)1/3 , 9 T 5/9 ∆t∗ ≃ 160 sec B−4/9 B10/9 E∗ ≃ 5 · 1028 erg Lk,9 L2+2/9 H∗ ≃ 3 · 1026 erg sec−1 Lk,9 L2+1/9 loop,6 (γτrad,0)−2/3 , (43) z,2 T 10/9 loop,6 (γτrad,0)2/3 ,(44) B14/9 z,2 × (41) (42) 9 9 × T 5/9 loop,6 (γτrad,0)4/3 . (45) Next, recasting the RTV loop-temperature scaling in terms of the electron density instead of the pressure, loop ≃ 3 · 106 K n1/2 T RTV 10 L1/2 k,9 , and substituting it into the above scalings, we get: (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) in order to confirm, modify, or refute various elements of my model. First, the whole picture hinges, in part, on the premise that reconnection is slow in the collisional regime. Al- though in the above discussion I have for definiteness as- sumed that it is as slow as in the classical Sweet -- Parker model, I don't actually think that this needs to be the case. If the true rate of classical resistive-MHD reconnec- tion turns out to be much faster than Sweet -- Parker, the overall picture would still stand, qualitatively, as long this rate is still much smaller than the collisionless re- connection rate. The only thing that matters is that there are two regimes, slow and fast, and the transition between them is governed by the collisionality of the re- connection layer. Nevertheless, from the point of view of my picture, studies of slow collisional (resistive MHD) reconnection are just as important as those of fast collisionless recon- nection. One would like to tighten up the case for slow reconnection. Thus, I would like to encourage more stud- ies of resistive reconnection, to really confirm that it is slow. Thus, it is important to address the following spe- cific issues, best using numerical simulations: 1) Does the presence of small-scale 3D MHD turbu- lence enhance reconnection rate, as suggested by Lazar- ian & Vishniac (1999)? If it does, how large is the en- hancement and what determines it? Could it be as fast as collisionless reconnection, in which case it would con- stitute a challenge to the picture presented in this paper? To address this issue, one would have to perform a 3D MHD simulation involving a regular large-scale recon- nection layer with a super-imposed 3D MHD turbulence. Just as importantly, one needs to investigate the possibil- ity that 3D MHD turbulence is spontaneously generated inside the layer by the secondary-instability mechanism of Dahlburg et al., (1992, 2005), and evaluate its effect on the time-averaged reconnection rate. 2) What is the effect of the 2D tearing instability inside the resistive Sweet -- Parker layer, on the overall, time- averaged reconnection rate? It is expected that tearing instability may become important in reconnection layers that are very long, with aspect ratios L/δ > 100. It may then make the reconnection process inherently time- dependent, bursty. Therefore, in order to investigate this issue, one would have to perform only a 2D simulation, but with a very high resolution (corresponding to S > 104) and with a very long duration (to be able to average over many bursts). 3) The majority of existing numerical studies of resistive-MHD reconnection use a constant uniform re- sistivity. It is important to check whether the main re- sults will be the same if one uses the actual Spitzer re- sistivity. This is especially important in the context of a magnetically-dominated environment, such as the solar corona, where the temperature inside the reconnection layer may be much higher than the ambient tempera- ture. As a result, the Spitzer resistivity may vary by a factor of a hundred across the layer, being much smaller at its center. 4) One should further pursue numerical studies of mag- netic reconnection that include both resistive MHD and Hall effect, along the lines of the recent work by Cas- sak et al. (2005, 2006, 2007). Of particular interest is the k,9 γ3/2 ∗ ≃ 6 · 1010 cm−3 Bz,2 L−1/4 L5/4 nRTV −3 , 9 k,9 γ3/4 z,2 L−1/8 L9/8 loop,∗ ≃ 7 · 106 K B1/2 T RTV −3 , 9 k,9 γ3/4 0,∗ ≃ 80 G B5/6 z,2 L1/24 L5/8 BRTV −3 , k,9 γ−1/4 L5/8 ∗ ≃ 900 sec B−1/6 z,2 L1/24 −3 B5/3 k,9 L2+1/12 ∗ ≃ 2.5 · 1029 erg L9/4 ERTV z,2 γ3/2 ∆tRTV 9 9 9 , −3 , (51) H RTV ∗ ≃ 3 · 1026 erg sec−1 × B11/6 × L13/8 k,9 L2+1/24 9 z,2 γ7/4 −3 , (52) where, in addition, we introduced γ−3 ≡ γ · 103 sec and used τrad,0 = 400 sec. A similar exercise could be conducted, for example, for an entirely different cooling function (Cook et al. 1989; Landi & Landini 1999; Aschwanden et al. 2000a) and/or for a different scaling law [e.g., that derived by Cargill et al. (1995) or, observationally, by Kano & Tsuneta (1995)]. These estimates give us the characteristic scales of micro- and nanoflare-like energy-release events in a bright coronal loop of a fixed length Lk, fixed cross-loop spatial scale L, and a fixed axial magnetic field Bz, sub- ject to continuous braiding at a fixed rate γ. It is of course understood that this is just an idealized model set-up and that, in practice, using such typical values straight-forwardly may not be meaningful because of the highly inhomogeneous nature of the solar corona. 4. DISCUSSION: WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE In this section I will discuss several open questions rel- evant to the physical picture presented in this paper -- questions that I would like to see answered in the near future. Correspondingly, I will describe possible studies (mostly numerical) that I think ought to be performed 3 Note that, to derive their scaling, RTV78 actually used an approximation of the Raymond cooling function: Q(T ) ∼ T −1/2. Solar Coronal Heating 15 intermediate regime, when δSP > di, ρi but at the same time Ωe > νe. The objective of such simulations would be to observe the transition from slow to fast reconnec- tion within one simulation run as the upstream plasma parameters, such as B0 or n, are gradually changed, pass- ing the critical point. Whereas the results published by Cassak et al. (2005, 2006, 2007) are already very impor- tant, the relevant parameter space is large and similar studies need to be extended to other regimes, most no- tably to a situation where βupstream ≪ 1. Also, these results need to be confirmed by other groups, preferably with a more realistic electron-to-ion mass ratio, a larger box size, and higher numerical resolution. 5) Future numerical studies of collisional reconnection should include realistic energy balance taking into ac- count both Ohmic heating and the electron thermal con- duction. The goal here would be to calculate the values of Te and ne at the center of the reconnection region. Also, one needs to study temperature equilibration be- tween ions and electrons. 6) Effect of viscosity on resistive-MHD reconnection needs to be assessed. 7) The effect of a strong guide field on resistive-MHD reconnection and on the transition to the fast regime (e.g., Cassak et al. 2007) needs to be investigated in more detail. 8) Finally, I would like to strongly encourage further experimental (laboratory) studies of collisional reconnec- tion, especially in the large-S limit. In addition to the above questions related to collisional reconnection, there are several important issues related to collisionless reconnection: (1) What is its physical na- ture of anomalous resistivity due to wave-particle interac- tions and under what conditions is it excited? (2) What is the structure of the Petschek-like reconnection layer for a given functional form of anomalous resistivity and what is the resulting reconnection rate in terms of the basic physical parameters? Does the anomalous resistiv- ity spread along the separatrices (Petschek's shocks) or is it present only in the small central region? If the latter is the case, then how does the plasma crossing the shocks gets heated? (3) When does laminar a Hall-effect (or, in general, two-fluid) reconnection take place? How do Hall effect and anomalous resistivity co-exist and interact with each other? (4) How rapid is two-fluid reconnec- tion? What parameters affect the reconnection rate in this regime? (5) What is the effect of guide field on trig- gering and saturation of Hall-regime reconnection and on anomalous resistivity? (6) Is collisionless reconnec- tion process bursty and, if so, what is the time-averaged reconnection rate? (7) What is the overall partitioning of the released energy between the bulk kinetic energy, elec- tron and ion thermal energies, and nonthermal particle acceleration? Finally, in order to be realistic, future numerical simu- lations of the solar corona should include all of the follow- ing (c.f., Miyagoshi & Yokoyama 2003; Klimchuk 2006): (1) flux emergence processes and random motions of the field-line footpoints; (2) physically-motivated prescrip- tion for transition to fast reconnection, such as the one suggested in this paper; such a prescription would thus play a role of a subgrid model used in a large-scale MHD simulation of the corona; (3) mass exchange between the corona and the solar surface (e.g., chromospheric evap- oration and plasma precipitation); (4) optically-thin ra- diative energy losses and thermal conduction (including the contribution due to nonthermal electrons) along the magnetic field lines. 5. CONCLUSIONS Magnetic reconnection research started 50 years ago in the field of Solar Physics, with the Sweet -- Parker (Sweet 1958; Parker 1957) model for solar flares, followed by the Petschek (1964) theory a few years later. These studies tackled the most fundamental micro-physical as- pects of the reconnection layer. Over time, however, the focus of solar reconnection research has shifted away from local basic physics of reconnection, despite the fact that reconnection has been confirmed observationally to be the key process responsible for magnetic energy release in flares (e.g., Tsuneta 1996, Yokoyama et al. 2001). Instead, the forefront of research on the fundamental physics of reconnection has moved in recent years to other fields, most notably, to Space Physics, where de- tailed in-situ measurements using Earth-orbiting space- craft are now available (e.g., Oieroset et al. 2001; Na- gai et al. 2001; Mozer et al. 2002), and to Laboratory Plasma Physics, where several dedicated experiments (Yamada et al. 1997; Egedal et al. 2007; Brown 1999) have already made fundamental contributions to our un- derstanding of reconnection. Most importantly, a lot of progress has been recently made using numerical simula- tions, again, mostly in the context of the Earth Magne- tosphere. The basic paradigm that emerges as a result of all these studies can be summarized as follows (see § 2.1). The starting point is the realization that there are in- deed two reconnection regimes. The first one is a slow (Sweet-Parker) resistive-MHD regime that is realized in relatively dense, collisional plasmas. The second one is a fast (Petschek-like) regime that takes place in col- lisionless plasmas. The mechanism for the fast colli- sionless reconnection can be either a locally-enhanced anomalous resistivity due to micro-instabilities triggered when the current density exceeds a certain threshold; or the Hall effect. In either case, one can formulate an approximate condition for the transition between the slow collisional and the fast collisionless regimes. If the guide field is not much larger than the reconnect- ing magnetic field, this condition is δSP < di, where δSP is the thickness of the Sweet -- Parker reconnection layer and di is the collisionless ion skin depth. One can further rewrite this condition in terms of the clas- sical electron mean free path λe,mfp inside the layer as L < Lc ∼ (mi/me)1/2 λe,mfp, where L is the global sys- tem size (Yamada et al. 2006). Due to the strong tem- perature dependence of λe,mfp, this form of the condi- tion highlights the need to estimate the electron temper- ature Te at the center of the layer. Using considerations of pressure balance and energy conservation (see § 2.3), one can express Te in terms of the reconnecting magnetic field B0 and the background plasma density n. Then, the collisionless reconnection condition can be recast in terms of L, B0 and n, see equation (10) in § 2.2. In the case with a strong guide field Bz ≫ B0, the corresponding condition is δSP < ρi and this leads to an additional fac- tor (B0/Bz)2 in the expression for the critical length Lc [see eq. (23)]. 16 D. A. Uzdensky One of the main driving forces behind this paper is the author's desire to bring the recently-obtained knowledge about reconnection back to Solar Physics and to use it productively to build a better understanding of the solar corona. Although most of the present discussion is also relevant to solar flares, in this paper I focus predomi- nantly on the problem of solar coronal heating (see § 3). In the context of Parker's (1983, 1988) nanoflare the- ory of coronal heating, magnetic energy release in the solar corona takes place in the form of many unresolved reconnection events (nanoflares). One of the most im- portant features of this picture is the intermittent char- acter of energy release. Random footpoint motions lead to continuous twisting of elementary magnetic strands around each other, which, in turn, leads to the forma- tion of many small current sheets in the corona. Current sheets may form either in finite time, as suggested by Parker (1983, 1986), or exponentially in time, as was demonstrated by van Ballegooijen (1986) and later nu- merically by Galsgaard & Nordlund (1996); for our pur- poses, it does not matter which one is correct. What matters is that thin current layers do eventually form. Free magnetic energy accumulates for a while and is then suddenly released in distinct fast reconnection events. In the present paper, I suggest that the transition between the slow and fast reconnection regimes plays a key role in determining when a given nanoflare will take off and how much energy will be released (see also Cassak et al. 2005). My model can thus be regarded as an alterna- tive to the secondary-instability mechanism proposed by Dahlburg et al. (2003). Furthermore, I argue that the fact that the fast reconnection condition involves the am- bient plasma density is an important part of the story. The reason for this is that the density in the corona is not a fixed constant; in a given loop, it constantly changes in response to radiative cooling and chromospheric evapo- ration caused by coronal energy-release events. The ba- sic picture here is the following. A coronal energy re- lease leads to an increase in density, thus making the plasma more collisional. This temporarily inhibits fast reconnection in the given region until the density de- creases again (on the radiative cooling timescale) to be- low a certain critical value. At this point fast reconnec- tion again becomes possible. On the longer time-scale, a quasi-periodic behavior is established, characterized by repeated cycles that include fast reconnection events, fol- lowed by chromospheric evaporation episodes, followed by relatively long (∼ 1 hour) and steady periods during which free magnetic energy in the loop builds up and the plasma gradually cools down. Thus, coronal heating can be viewed as a self-regulating process that statistically keeps the density roughly near the critical value for the fast reconnection transition. In other words, the system constantly fluctuates around the state of marginal colli- sionality as defined by the collisionless reconnection con- dition. In the long-term statistical equilibrium, a balance is maintained in which the amount of plasma pumped into a coronal loop as a result of an evaporation episode is equal to the amount of plasma drained down to the sur- face during the gradual radiative cooling stage that takes place between two subsequent fast-reconnection events. The characteristic equilibrium density, the time interval between reconnection episodes, and the energy released in each such episode can be estimated in terms of the loop's longitudinal magnetic field, its characteristic size, and the footpoint driving rate (see § 3). Finally, I believe that the physical framework de- veloped in this paper should also be applicable to magnetically-dominated coronae of other astrophysical objects, such as other stars and accretion disks (Good- man & Uzdensky 2007). I am grateful to S. Antiochos, P. Cassak, J. Goodman, H. Ji, J. Klimchuk, R. Kulsrud, E. Parker, M. Shay, and M. Yamada for stimulating discussions and encouraging remarks and to the anonymous referee for useful sugges- tions. This work is supported by National Science Founda- tion Grant No. PHY-0215581 (PFC: Center for Mag- netic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas). REFERENCES Aschwanden, M. J, et al. 2000a, ApJ, 535, 1047 Aschwanden, M. J., Nightingale, R. W., & Alexander, D. 2000b, ApJ, 541, 1059 Aschwanden, M. J., Schrijver, C. J., & Alexander, D. 2001a, ApJ, 550, 1036 Aschwanden, M. J., Poland, A. I., & Rabin, D. M. 2001b, ARA&A, 39, 175 Aschwanden, M. J., Winebarger, A., Tsiklauri, D., Peter, H. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1673 Bhattacharjee, A., Ma, Z. W., & Wang, X. 1999, JGR, 104, 14543 Bhattacharjee, A., Ma, Z. W., & Wang, X. 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 1829 Birn, J. et al. 2001, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3715 Biskamp, D. 1986, Phys. Fluids, 29, 1520. Biskamp, D., Schwarz, E., & Drake, J. F. 1995, PRL 73, 3850 Biskamp, D., Schwarz, E., & Drake, J. F. 1997, Phys. Plasmas, 4, 1002 Biskamp, D., & Schwarz, E. 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 4729 Breslau, J. A. & Jardin, S. C. 2003, Phys. Plasmas, 10, 1291 Brown, J. C., Krucker, S., Gudel, M., & Benz. A. O. 2000, A&A, 359, 1185 Brown, M. R. 1999, Phys. Plasmas, 6, 1717 Brown, M. R., Cothran, C. D., & Fung, J. 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 056503 Bulanov, S. V., Syrovatsky, S. I., & Sakai, J. 1978, JETP Lett., 28, 177 Cargill, P. J., Mariska, J. T., & Antiochos, S. K. 1995, ApJ, 439, 1034 Cassak, P., Shay, M., & Drake, J. 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 235002 Cassak, P., Drake, J., & Shay, M. 2006, ApJ, 644, L145 Cassak, P., Drake, J., & Shay, M. 2007, Phys. Plasmas, 14, 054502 Cook, J. W., Cheng, C.-C., Jacobs, V. L., & Antiochos, S. K. 1989, ApJ, 338, 1176 Coppi, B. & Frieldland, A. B. 1971, ApJ, 169, 379 Coroniti, F. V. & Eviatar, A. 1977, ApJS, 33, 189 Dahlburg, R. B., Antiochos, S. K., & Zang, T. A. 1992, Phys. Fluids B, 4, 3902 Dahlburg, R. B., Klimchuk, J. A., & Antiochos, S. K. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1191 Solar Coronal Heating 17 Daughton, W., Scudder, J., & Karimabadi, H. 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 072101 Egedal, J., Fox, W., Katz, N., Porkolab, M., Reim, K., & Zhang, E. 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 015003 Erkaev, N. V., Semenov, V. S., & Jamitzky, F. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 1455 Erkaev, N. V., Semenov, V. S., Alexeev, I. V., & Biernat, H. K. 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 4800 Forbes, T. G. & Priest, E. R. 1983, Solar Phys., 84, 169 Fujimoto, K. 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 072904 Galsgaard, K. & Nordlund, A. 1996, JGR, 101, 13445 Goodman, J. & Uzdensky, D. A. 2007, in preparation Gudiksen, B. V. & Nordlund, A. 2002, ApJ, 572, L113 Gudiksen, B. V. & Nordlund, A. 2005, ApJ, 618, 1020 Heitsch, F. & Zweibel, E. G. 2003, ApJ, 583, 229 Hendrix, D. L., van Hoven, G., Mikic, Z., & Schnack, D. D. 1996, ApJ, 470, 1192 Hsu S. C., Carter, T. A., Fiksel, G., Ji, H., Kulsrud, R. M., & Yamada, M. 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 1916 Huba, J. D. & Rudakov, L. I. 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 175003 Hesse, M., Schindler, K., Birn, J., & Kuznetsova, M. 1999, Phys. Plasmas, 6, 1781 Ji, H., Yamada, M., Hsu S., & Kulsrud, R. 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 3256 Ji, H., Terry, S., Yamada, M., Kulsrud, R. Kuritsyn, A., & Ren, Y. 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 115001 Kano, R. & Tsuneta, S. 1995, ApJ, 454, 934 Karimabadi, H., Daughton, W., & Scudder, J. 2007, Geo- phys. Res. Lett., 34, L13104 Kim, E.-J., & Diamond, P. H. 2001, Phys. Lett. A, 291, 407 Kleva, R. G., Drake, J. F., & Waelbroeck F. L., 1995, Phys. Plasmas, 2, 23 Klimchuk, J. A. 2006, Solar Phys., 234, 41 Kulsrud, R. M. 2001, Earth, Planets and Space, 53, 417 Kulsrud, R. M. 2005, "Plasma Physics for Astrophysics", Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton Kulsrud, R., Ji, H., Fox, W., & Yamada, M. 2005, Phys. Plasmas, 12, 082301 Kuritsyn, A., Yamada, M., Gerhardt, S., Ji, H., Kulsrud, R., & Ren, Y., 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 055703 Landi, E. & Landini, M. 1999, A&A, 347, 401 Lee, L. C. & Fu, Z. F. 1986, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 6807 Lottermoser, R.-F. & Scholer, M. 1997, JGR, 102, 4875 Loureiro, N. F., Schekochihin, A. A., & Cowley, S. C. 2007, submitted to PRL; preprint (astro-ph/0703631) Lyutikov, M. & Uzdensky, D. 2003, ApJ, 589, 893 Ma, Z. W. & Bhattacharjee, A. 1996, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 1673 Malyshkin, L. M., Linde, T., & Kulsrud, R. M. 2005, Phys. Plasmas, 12, 102902 Masuda, S., Kosugi, T., Hara, H., Tsuneta, S., & Ogawara, Y. 1994, Nature, 371, 495 Masuda, S., Kosugi, T., Hara, H., Sakao, T., Shibata, K., & Tsuneta, S. 1995, PASJ, 47, 677 Miyagoshi, T. & Yokoyama, T. 2003, ApJ, 593, L133 Mozer F. S., Bale, S. D., & Phan, T. D. 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 015002 Nagai, T., Shinohara, I., Fujimoto, M., Hoshino, M., Saito, Y., Machida, S., & Mukai, T. 2001, JGR, 106, 25929 Oieroset, M., Phan, T.D., Fujimoto, M., Lin, R.P., & Lepping, R.P. 2001, Nature, 412, 414 Parker, E. N. 1957, J. Geophys. Res., 62, 509 Parker, E. N. 1972, ApJ, 174, 499 Parker, E. N. 1983, ApJ, 264, 642 Parker, E. N. 1988, ApJ, 330, 474 Petschek, H. E. 1964, AAS-NASA Symposium on Solar Flares, (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1964), NASA SP50, 425. Porter, L. & Klimchuk, J. 1995, ApJ, 454, 499 Priest, E. 1984, Solar Magnetohydrodynamics, (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984) Raymond, J. C., Cox, D. P., & Smith, B. W. 1976, ApJ, 204, 290 Raymond, J. C. & Smith, B. W. 1977, ApJS, 35, 419 Ren, Y., Yamada, M., Gerhardt, S., Ji, H., Kulsrud, R., & Kuritsyn, A., 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 055003 Rogers, B. N., Denton, R. E., Drake J. F., & Shay, M. A. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 195004 Rosner, R., Tucker, W. H., & Vaiana, G. S. 1978, ApJ, 220, 643 (RTV78) Sato, T. & Hayashi, T. 1979, Phys. Fluids, 22, 1189 Scholer, M. 1989, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 8805. Shay, M. A. & Drake, J. F. 1998, JGR, 103, 9165 Shay, M. A., Drake, J. F., Rogers, B. N., & Denton, R. E. 1999, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2163 Shay, M. A., Drake, J. F., Rogers, B. N., & Denton, R. E. 2001, JGR, 106, 3759 Shay, M. A., Drake, J. F., & Swisdak, M. 2007, submitted to PRL; preprint (arXiv:0704.0818) Shibata, K., Masuda, S., Shimojo, M., Hara, H., Yokoyama, T., Tsuneta, S., Kosugi, T., Ogawara, Y. 1995, ApJ, 451, L83 Shibata, K. 1996, Adv. Space Res., 17(4/5), 9 Smith, P. F. & Priest, E. R. 1972, ApJ, 176, 487 Strauss, H. R., 1988, ApJ, 326, 412 Sweet, P. A. 1958, in IAU Symp. 6, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics, ed. B. Lehnert, (Cam- bridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 123. Thompson, C. 1994, MNRAS, 270, 480 Titov, V. S. & Hornig, G. 2002, Adv. Space Res., 29, 1087 Trintchouk, F., Yamada, M., Ji, H., Kulsrud, R. M. & Carter, T. A. 2003, Phys. Plasmas 10, 319 Tsuneta, S., Takakura, T., Nitta, N., Makishima, K., Murakami, T., Oda, M., Ogawara, Y., Kondo, I., Ohki, K., & Tanaka, K. 1984, ApJ, 280, 887 Tsuneta, S., Hara, H., Shimizu, T., Acton, L. W., Strong, K. T., Hudson, H. S., & Ogawara, Y. 1992, PASJ, 44, L63 Tsuneta, S. 1996, ApJ, 456, 840 Ugai, M., & Tsuda, T. 1977, J. Plasma Phys., 17, 337. Ugai, M. 1986, Phys. Fluids, 29, 3659 Ugai, M. 1992, Phys. Fluids B, 4, 2953 Ugai, M. 1999, Phys. Plasmas, 6, 1522 Uzdensky, D. A., & Kulsrud, R. M. 1998, Phys. Plasmas, 5, 3249 Uzdensky, D. A., & Kulsrud, R. M. 2000, Phys. Plasmas, 7, 4018. Uzdensky, D. A. 2003, ApJ, 587, 450 Uzdensky, D. A. & Kulsrud, R. M. 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 062305 Uzdensky, D. A. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0607656 Uzdensky, D. A. 2007, Mem. Soc. Ast. It., 78, 317; ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints: astro-ph/0702699 Uzdensky, D. A. & MacFadyen, A. I. 2006, ApJ, 647, 18 D. A. Uzdensky 1192 van Ballegooijen, A. A. 1986, ApJ, 311, 1001 Yamada, M., Ji, H., Hsu, S., Carter, T., Kulsrud, R., Bretz, N., Jobes, F., Ono, Y., & Perkins, F. 1997, Phys. Plasmas, 4, 1936 Yamada, M., et al. 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 052119 Yokoyama, T., Akita, K., Morimoto, T., Inoue, K., & Newmark, J. ApJ, 546, L69
0807.0460	1	0807	2008-07-02T21:58:22	Gravitational fragmentation and the formation of brown dwarfs in stellar clusters	[ "astro-ph" ]	We investigate the formation of brown dwarfs and very low-mass stars through the gravitational fragmentation of infalling gas into stellar clusters. The gravitational potential of a forming stellar cluster provides the focus that attracts gas from the surrounding molecular cloud. Structures present in the gas grow, forming filaments flowing into the cluster centre. These filaments attain high gas densities due to the combination of the cluster potential and local self-gravity. The resultant Jeans masses are low, allowing the formation of very low-mass fragments. The tidal shear and high velocity dispersion present in the cluster preclude any subsequent accretion thus resulting in the formation of brown dwarfs or very low-mass stars. Ejections are not required as the brown dwarfs enter the cluster with high relative velocities, suggesting that their disc and binary properties should be similar to that of low-mass stars. This mechanism requires the presence of a strong gravitational potential due to the stellar cluster implying that brown dwarf formation should be more frequent in stellar clusters than in distributed populations of young stars. Brown dwarfs formed in isolation would require another formation mechanism such as due to turbulent fragmentation.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000–000 (0000) Printed 27 December 2017 (MN LaTEX style file v2.2) Gravitational fragmentation and the formation of brown dwarfs in stellar clusters Ian A. Bonnell1⋆, Paul Clark2 and Matthew R. Bate3 1 SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS. 2 Institut fuer Theoretische Astrophysik, Albert-Ueberle-Str. 2, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany 3 School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QL 27 December 2017 ABSTRACT We investigate the formation of brown dwarfs and very low-mass stars through the gravitational fragmentation of infalling gas into stellar clusters. The gravitational po- tential of a forming stellar cluster provides the focus that attracts gas from the sur- rounding molecular cloud. Structures present in the gas grow, forming filaments flowing into the cluster centre. These filaments attain high gas densities due to the combina- tion of the cluster potential and local self-gravity. The resultant Jeans masses are low, allowing the formation of very low-mass fragments. The tidal shear and high velocity dispersion present in the cluster preclude any subsequent accretion thus resulting in the formation of brown dwarfs or very low-mass stars. Ejections are not required as the brown dwarfs enter the cluster with high relative velocities, suggesting that their disc and binary properties should be similar to that of low-mass stars. This mecha- nism requires the presence of a strong gravitational potential due to the stellar cluster implying that brown dwarf formation should be more frequent in stellar clusters than in distributed populations of young stars. Brown dwarfs formed in isolation would require another formation mechanism such as due to turbulent fragmentation. Key words: stars: formation – stars: luminosity function, mass function – globular clusters and associations: general. 1 INTRODUCTION Brown dwarfs, having masses less than 0.08 M⊙, are seen to be nearly as frequent as stars and to have many of the same properties during their youth such as circumstellar discs, binary companions, and chromospheric activity (Burgasser et al. 2007; Luhman et al. 2007; Scholz, Jawyawardhana & Wood 2006). There have been several proposed mechanisms to explain the origin of brown dwarfs (Whitworth et al. 2007). These have involved such diverse physical processes as turbulent fragmentation, disc fragmentation, the ejection of stellar embryos and the photo-evaporation of a collapsing prestellar core. These different mechanisms all rely in form- ing a hence high gas density in the prestellar cores and thus a low Jeans mass, and/or in the halting of accretion once a low-mass fragment has formed. Turbulent fragmentation (Padoan & Nordlund 2002) envisions that strong, magnetic shocks produce high den- sity post-shock gas which will have low Jeans masses and therefore form brown dwarfs directly from the turbulence ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] (Padoan & Nordlund 2004). One of the potential difficulties with this model is that a straight shock only compresses the gas in 1-D. This does not affect the overall gravitational ra- dius of the gas and thus has a negligible effect of the Jeans mass as the gravitational and thermal energies are basically unchanged (Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1978; Lubow & Pringle 1993; Clarke 1999). Several roughly coincident shocks are re- quired in order to get 3-D compression and a reduction in the Jeans mass. The turbulent compression model also ne- glects any residual internal turbulence generated from the shocks (Clark & Bonnell 2005). Disc fragmentation (Bate, Bonnell & Bromm 2002; Whitworth & Stamatellos 2006; Goodwin & Whitworth 2007; Stamatellos et al. 2007) occurs when a massive cir- cumstellar disc is unstable to gravitational fragmentation, potentially induced by a stellar fly-by (but see Clarke et al. 2007). The disc provides the high density material such that the Jeans mass is necessarily low. Post formation accretion from the massive disc onto the brown dwarf could increase the mass significantly while forming brown dwarfs in single systems is more difficult. Ejection of newly formed fragments in multiple systems 2 I. A. Bonnell et al. (Reipurth & Clarke 2001; Bate, Bonnell & Bromm 2002; Bate & Bonnell 2005) can halt any post formation accretion such that the fragment maintains a low mass. This still re- quires that the Jeans mass at the point of fragmentation is of order a brown dwarf mass such as occurs in circumstellar discs and infalling filaments. One of the potential difficulties in this mechanism is that the ejection will tend to truncate discs at radii of order 10 AU, and likewise disrupt any bina- ries with separations comparable or larger to this. One final mechanism is the photoevaporation of collaps- ing cores (Whitworth & Zinnecker 2004). This mechanism envisions that a collapsing core in the proximity of an O star will be photo-eroded before it can fully collapse. The outer layer of the core will be ionised and unbound while adding a pressure term onto the inner collapsing core ensuring that a lower-mass object is formed. The primary difficulty with this mechanism is that it would need to be finely tuned such that the radiation field is strong enough to have an effect but not so strong such that it would completely destroy the core. Furthermore, it requires the presence of an ionising source of radiation such that it could only explain brown dwarfs in the presence of O-stars. In this paper, we present some recent results on the for- mation of low-mass stars and brown dwarfs due to the pres- ence of stellar clusters. We show that brown dwarfs form in an analogous manner to low-mass stars, due to the gravi- tational fragmentation of high density gas as it infalls into a stellar cluster. The primary differences with our previous work (Bate et al. 2002) is that we stress how the low frag- mentation is reached due to gravitational compression, and that subsequent accretion is limited due to the high virial velocities in clusters such that ejections are not needed. Our calculations are presented in §2 while the primary results are presented in §3. Section 4 dissects the role of the stel- lar cluster in forming brown dwarfs while §5 presents some observational signatures of the process described here. 2 CALCULATIONS The results presented here are based on a large-scale Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation of a cylindrical 104 M⊙ molecular cloud 10 pc in length and 3 pc in cylindrical diameter. We have chosen an elongated cloud rather than the more standard spherical cloud as most molecular clouds are non-sperhical and commonly elongated (e.g. Orion A). This also allows for the physical properties to be varied along the cloud in a straightforward manner. The cloud has a linear density gradient along its major axis with maximum/minimum values, at each end of the cylinder, 33 percent high/lower than the average gas density. The gas has internal turbulence following a Larson-type P (k) ∼ k−4 power law and is normalised such that the total kinetic en- ergy balances the total gravitational energy in the cloud. The density gradient then results in one end of the cloud being over bound (still super virial) while the other end of the cloud is unbound. The cloud is populated with 15.5 million SPH particles on two levels, providing high resolution in regions of inter- est. We initially performed a lower resolution run with 5 million SPH particles producing an average mass resolution of 0.15M⊙. Upon completion of this low resolution simula- tion, we used three criteria to identify the regions that re- quired higher resolution. This included the particles which formed sinks, and those that were accreted onto sinks. It also included particles which attained sufficiently high den- sity such that their local Jeans mass was no longer resolved in the low-resolution run. All of these particles were iden- tified and from the initial conditions of the low resolution run, they were spit into 9 particles each to create the initial conditions for the high resolution simulations. This particle splitting was performed on the initial conditions to ensure that the physical quantities of mass, momentum, energy and the energy spectrum were preserved. Note that the particle splitting does not introduce finer structure in the turbulent energy spectrum. This produced a mass resolution for the regions involved in star formation of 0.0167M⊙, sufficient to resolve the formation of brown dwarfs, equivalent to a total number of 4.5 × 107 SPH particles. The equation of state (below) was specified in order to ensure that the Jeans mass in the higher resolution run did not descend below this mass resolution. This simulation was rerun from the beginning to en- sure that the particle splitting did not affect the ongoing evolution. Particle splitting results in a marked increase in resolution without unmanageable computational costs (Kit- sionas & Whitworth 2002, 2007). Note however some of the unsplit particles, which in the low resolution run neither ex- ceeded their Jeans mass limit nor became involved in the star formation, did get accreted by the additional stars in the high resolution run. This is to be expected as their are now additional locations of star formation not present in the low resolution run and these additional sinks will necessarily accrete unsplit particles. The simulation follows a barotropic equation of state of the form: P = kργ where γ = 0.75; γ = 1.0; γ = 1.4; γ = 1.0; ρ ≤ ρ1 ρ1 ≤ ρ ≤ ρ2 ρ2 ≤ ρ ≤ ρ3 ρ ≥ ρ3, (1) (2) and ρ1 = 5.5 × 10−19g cm−3, ρ2 = 5.5 × 10−15g cm−3, ρ3 = 2 × 10−13g cm−3. The initial cooling part of the equation of state mimics the effects of line cooling and ensures that the Jeans mass at the point of fragmentation is appropriate for characteris- tic stellar mass (Larson 2005; Jappsen et al. 2005; Bonnell, Clarke & Bate 2006). The γ = 1.0 approximates the effect of dust cooling (Larson 2005) while the γ = 1.4 mimics the effects of when the collapsing core is optically thick to IR radiation, although its location at ρ = 5.5 × 10−15gcm−3, at lower densities than is typical, is in order to ensure that the Jeans mass is always fully resolved and that a single self- gravitating fragment is turned into a sink particle. A higher critical density for this optically-thick phase where heating occurs would likely result in an increase in the numbers of brown dwarfs formed. the physical processes described would be unchanged. The final isothermal phase of the equa- tion of state is simply in order to allow sink-particle forma- tion to occur, which requires a subvirial collapsing fragment. Star formation in the cloud is modelled through the in- Formation of brown dwarfs 3 Figure 1. The final distribution of the gas and stars in the simulation is shown in the 8 by 8 pc image. The stars are indicated by the yellow filled circles while the brown dwarfs are indicated by the filled blue circles with white edges. The brown dwarfs are located primarily in clustered regions as these provide the necessary physical properties to form low mass objects. The gas column densities are also plotted from 0.01 (black) to 100 (white) g cm−2. troduction of sink-particles (Bate, Bonnell & Price 1995). Sink-particles formation is allowed once the gas density of a collapsing fragment reaches ρ ≥ 6.8 × 10−14 g cm−3 although the equation of state ensures that this requires ρ ≥ 2. × 10−13gcm−3. The neighbouring SPH particles need be within a radius of 1. × 10−3 pc and that fragment must be subvirial and collapsing. Once created, the sinks accrete bound gas within 1. × 10−3 pc and all gas that comes within 2.×10−4 pc. The sinks have their mutual gravitational inter- actions smoothed to 2. × 10−4 pc or 40 au. No interactions including binary or disc disruptions can occur within this radius. 3 BROWN DWARF FORMATION IN TURBULENT MOLECULAR CLOUDS The simulation was followed for 1.02 free-fall times or ≈ 6.6 × 105 years and ≈ 3.9 × 105 years after the first stars formed. During this time, 2542 stars were formed with masses between 0.017 and 30 M⊙. Of these, ≈ 23 per cent have masses below 0.08M⊙ but only ≈ 10 per cent (243 objects) have m ≤ 0.08M⊙ and have stopped accreting. A further 3 per cent are likely to maintain m ≤ 0.08M⊙ given their final accretion rates and assuming that this accretion is sustained over the next free-fall time. This gives an ex- pected final number of brown dwarfs of 342 or 13 per cent of the stars formed. Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution of the brown dwarfs at the end of the simulation. They are primarily in or around forming stellar clusters. We will in- vestigate the process by which they form in the following sections. Most formation mechanisms for brown dwarfs envision that the physical conditions in the pre-fragmented gas are such that the Jeans mass, the minimum mass to be gravita- tionally bound, be of order a brown dwarf mass (Elmegreen 2004; Whitworth et al. 2007; Bonnell et al. 2007). Figure 2 plots the median gas density, and respective Jeans mass, within 0.05 pc (a typical Jeans length) of where the sink- particle will form. These values are calculated from the gas distribution just prior (within 2300 years) to the formation of the sink-particle. The gas densities and Jeans masses are plotted against the final masses that these sinks attain by the end of the simulation. We see that the moderate mass sinks (0.5 − 2M⊙) form in low density gas where the Jeans mass is of order 0.1 to almost 1.0 M⊙. In contrast, the lower- mass sinks form from higher density gas and thus from low Jeans masses. Note that there is not a perfect one-to-one cor- respondence between the Jeans masses and the final masses 4 I. A. Bonnell et al. Figure 2. The gas density (left) and Jeans mass (right) are plotted against the final stellar masses for the 2542 sinks formed. Both the gas density and Jeans mass are calculated within a radius of 0.05 pc from the incipient sink particle within ≈ 2300 years prior to the sink formation. The gas densities are higher, and the Jeans masses lower, for the low-mass sinks formed as is expected when the physical conditions of the gas determine the fragment masses. even for small masses due to the somewhat arbitrariness of evaluating the physical conditions within a fixed radius of 0.05 pc. What is important is that the physical properties in the gas are appropriate to give very low-mass fragments such that forming brown dwarfs in these regions is natural. Subsequent accretion can also increase the final masses from the low value generated at the point of the fragmentation. This is more evident for the high-mass sinks where the vast majority of their final masses comes from the subsequent competitive accretion (Bonnell et al. 2001; Bonnell, Vine & Bate 2004; Bonnell & Bate 2006). The first conclusion we can make is that the brown dwarfs form as lower-mass stars do, from the fragmenta- tion of a gas cloud where the thermal Jeans mass is of order the mass of the object formed. The next question is what drives the gas to such densities that brown dwarfs can form. One possibility is that turbulent compression leads to the formation of dense cores and thus brown dwarfs (Padoan & Nordlund 2004). The spatial distribution of the brown dwarfs in figure 1 argues against this as the brown dwarfs are not located randomly throughout the cloud but are lo- cated in the vicinity of stellar clusters. Furthermore, as SPH is Lagrangian, we can trace the particles that form individ- ual sinks backwards in time. We can estimate the fraction of an individual sink's mass that is brought to the point of for- mation by the turbulent flows. This shows that the turbulent flows are responsible for transporting only of order one per cent of the fragment's mass to within 0.04 pc of where the sink eventually forms. Instead additional acceleration, such as occurs when the gas enters the gravitational potential of the cluster, are necessary. We can therefore conclude that, in this simulation, turbulence does not lead to the formation of brown dwarfs. Figure 3. The mass density of stars within 0.25 pc of the form- ing sink-particle is plotted as a function of the final mass in the sink-particle. The moderate and high-mass sinks form in regions of low stellar mass density whereas the low-mass stars and brown dwarfs appear to require the presence of a stellar cluster and its strong gravitational potential in order to form. The gravitational potential of the cluster generates the high gas densities needed for forming low-mass objects. The stellar mass densities are cal- culated within ≈ 2000 years prior to the sink formation. Regions completely devoid of stars prior to the sink formation are given a stellar mass density of 1 M⊙ pc−3. Note that although the high- mass stars form in regions of low stellar mass density, they end up in the centre of the clusters which form subsequently around them. 4 BROWN DWARF FORMATION IN STELLAR CLUSTERS Gravity provides an alternative to turbulence in generating the high gas density conditions conducive to forming brown dwarfs. Gravity has the distinct advantage over turbulence in that it is intrinsically convergent and therefore better able to compress gas into small volumes. It also has the ten- dency of compressing a three-dimensional volume into two- dimensional sheets, one dimensional filaments and eventu- ally to point sources (Larson 1985; Bonnell 1999). The stellar clusters forming in the simulation provide a strong gravita- tion potential into which flowing gas can be compressed to much higher densities. Figure 3 shows the stellar mass den- sity within 0.25 pc, a typical size-scale of a stellar cluster, of the forming sink-particles just prior to sink formation. We see that while the moderate and high-mass sinks form in re- gions where the mass density of stars is low, low-mass stars and brown dwarfs form in regions of high stellar mass den- sity. This occurs as the moderate to higher-mass stars form first while the eventual low-mass stars and brown dwarfs only form as gas infalls into pre-existing stellar clusters. It is therefore the presence of the stellar cluster which is driv- ing the formation of these objects. The higher-mass stars form the basis for the forming cluster and thus also end up inside a region of high stellar mass density. Figure 4 shows the spatial distribution of the gas and stars within 0.05 pc of a forming brown dwarf. We see a large filament formed through the amplification of structure in the infalling gas due to the combination of the cluster potential and its self-gravity. Several knots of gas are forming along the filament, some of which go on to form brown dwarfs while the others collapse to form low-mass stars. Such an occur- rence of a filamentary structure infalling into the cluster is relatively common, although often some degree of tangential motion and thus angular momentum result in the filament being wound up around the protocluster as it infalls and forms low-mass objects. Figure 4 also plots the associated position-velocity di- agram of the infalling filament centred on the position and velocity of one of the forming brown dwarfs. The negative slope shows that the filament is falling into the cluster lo- cated at ≈ −0.035 pc and ≈ +2 km s−1. The gas is accel- erated into the cluster such that material at negative (pos- itive) positions relative to the forming brown dwarf have negative (positive) relative velocities, respectively. This di- vergent flow, as well as the large virial velocity the forming brown dwarf receives due to the cluster potential, restricts any subsequent accretion and thus maintains the low-mass of the object. On smaller scales, gravitational collapse reverses this pattern in the position velocity-diagram. Material at negative positions has positive relative velocities while ma- terial at positive positions has negative relative velocities indicating collapse. This tidal shearing of the filament acts to limit the mass of the object. Gas that would normally fall into the forming fragment is now pulled away by the large-scale potential. As a result, only the very high gas density fragments, and hence with low Jeans masses, form in such a shear flow. Figure 5 plots the Jeans mass of the 2542 sinks at the point of forma- tion as a function of the stellar mass density within 0.05 pc. We see that the Jeans masses decrease as the cluster stellar Formation of brown dwarfs 5 Figure 4. In the top panel we show a column density image of a gaseous filament which is forming brown dwarfs as it accretes onto a rich cluster. The position (0,0) in the co-ordinates shows the formation site of one of the new brown dwarfs. The column density scale runs from 0.5 to 50 g cm−2. The bottom panel shows a position-velocity diagram for the same region where the x-positions are centred on the same brown dwarf as in the upper panel. The velocities are calculated projected along the vector joining the brown dwarf at position x = 0 to the centre of mass of the cluster, and are again centred on the brown dwarf. Note that the colours in the bottom panel scale from 5 to 500 g cm−1 km−1 s. The diagonal form of the filament in position-velocity diagram reveals that the gas is accelerating into the cluster while being tidally sheared away from the objects that are forming within. Relative to the formation site of the brown dwarf, the vast ma- jority of the filament is moving away: gas at negative positions have negative relative velocities, while gas a positive positions have positive relative velocities. Only in the immediate region surrounding the still-forming brown dwarf can one see a reversal of this velocity signature, which denotes the gas falling on to the new object. This feature can be seen in several other points along the filament, showing the formation sites of other brown dwarfs or low-mass stars. 6 I. A. Bonnell et al. Figure 5. The Jeans mass within 0.05 pc of a proto-sink is plotted against the stellar mass density in the same region for the 2542 sinks formed. Note that the Jeans mass declines with increasing stellar mass density. This occurs as the gas density is higher in stellar clusters due to the effects of the gravitational potential and also that lower gas density fragments would be tidally disrupted and hence not form any sinks. The solid line indicates the Jeans mass assuming a gas density that is the same as the stellar mass density. This tidal limit provides an upper limit on the possible Jeans masses in the stellar cluster. Both the stellar mass densities and Jeans masses are calcualted within ≈ 2300 years prior to the sink formation. The Jeans mass is based on the median gas density in the region. mass density increases indicating the prevalence for forming low-mass objects in dense stellar clusters. Also plotted in figure 5 is the Jeans mass if the gas density was equal to the stellar mass density. This is the tidal limit for forming a fragment and provides an upper limit to the distribution of Jeans masses of the forming fragments. Higher-mass frag- ments cannot form as their high Jeans masses and low gas densities would result in their being tidally disrupted before they could collapse. The growth of a stellar cluster, acts to continually de- crease the Jeans mass and thus the fragmentation mass in the infalling gas. As more stars form or fall into the cluster, the increase in the stellar density increases the tidal shear- ing and thus necessitates higher gas densities in order for the fragments to be bound. Thus the fragment mass should decrease with time and with the growth of a cluster. Subse- quent accretion onto some of these objects will significantly increase their masses. 5 CLUSTER DYNAMICS AND ACCRETION In the previous section we saw that the low-mass sinks form as the gas infalls into an already formed stellar cluster. This has important implications as to why they remain low-mass objects of the typical mass of a brown dwarf rather than accreting from the abundant reservoir of gas in the stellar Figure 6. The relative velocity of the 2452 sinks at formation relative to the centre of mass velocity within 0.25 pc is plotted against the final mass of each sink. The sinks that attain mod- erate or high masses form with low relative velocities to their environment while those that remain low-mass objects form with high velocities relative to the centre of mass of their environments. This occurs as the sinks that attain moderate or high masses form earlier and constitute the initial stars in the cluster. The low-mass sinks form from gas falling into a already formed stellar cluster and thus have a high relative velocity. This high velocity also limits any subsequent accretion ensuring they remain low-mass objects. cluster. Figure 4 shows the gas being accelerated to high (negative) velocities as it infalls into the cluster's gravita- tional potential. Thus any newly formed fragment will enter the cluster at high velocity and therefore have difficulty in accreting from the reservoir of gas in the cluster. Figure 6 shows the relative velocity of each forming sink compared to its environment within 0.25 pc. The sinks that remain low- mass have high relative velocity, of order several km s−1 at the point of formation. In contrast, the sinks that ultimately attain moderate and high mass form with low relative ve- locities. This difference occurs as the low-mass sinks form from gas infalling into an already formed cluster whereas the sinks that attain high mass form before any stellar clus- ter is present. They are the first stars around which the cluster is built and due to their low relative velocity, they are able to accrete significant amounts of gas and become high-mass objects. The low-mass sinks cannot accrete signif- icantly due to their high relative velocity and thus remain low-mass objects. Estimated accretion rates for a low mass star (m ≤ 0.1M⊙) travelling at a high velocity (v ≥ 2 km s−1) in a gas reservoir of 10−17 g cm−3 is ≈ 5 × 10−8 M⊙ yr−1, which is too small to significantly alter the star's final mass over accretion times of tacc < ∼ 106 years (c.f. Bonnell & Bate 2006). In this scenario, the forming brown dwarfs and low- mass stars do not require any subsequent interactions or ejections to terminate their accretion processes. It is the acceleration due to the cluster potential which ensures that Formation of brown dwarfs 7 The velocities of the brown dwarfs and other low-mass objects are also similar to those of the other stars as both simply reflect the overall gravitational potential. Although the brown dwarfs form at higher relative velocities than do the higher mass objects, this is simply due to the presence or absence of a well defined gravitational potential at the point of formation. The velocities of the higher mass objects are initially low as they form before the cluster develops. Their velocities increase over time due to the infall of other stars into the growing cluster. Virial equilibrium ensures that they all have similar velocity dispersions. One significant observable feature is that the brown dwarfs, and for that matter the very low-mass stars, re- quire a gravitational potential to compress the gas to suffi- ciently high densities to attain low Jeans masses. This means that they form in regions of high stellar densities as shown in figure 3. There is some subsequent dynamical evolution and brown dwarfs, like low-mass stars, are more likely to be ejected in any dynamical event. Nevertheless, the brown dwarfs formed are more commonly found in a clustered envi- ronment. Figure 7 shows the fractional abundance of brown dwarfs as a function of stellar density. The stellar density is calculated from the distance to the ten nearest neighbours of each sink-particle. The abundance of brown dwarfs is plotted for all sinks that have masses in the range a brown dwarf masses and also for those that given their final accretion rates are likely to remain brown dwarfs over the following free-fall time, ≈ 6.5 × 105 years. We see that the frequency of brown dwarfs is significantly higher in the clustered than in the non-clustered regions, with a peak abundance of ≈ 25 per cent at high stellar densities which decreases to < ∼10 per cent in isolated or regions of low stellar densities. In general, the brown dwarf mass sinks in the lower den- sity bins are those that have been ejected from their natal clusters. This small number is thus likely to evolve with time from basically zero at the point of formation, and should in- crease somewhat over our final value as more low-mass clus- ter members are ejected from the clusters. Nevertheless, we expect that an observable signature of the process described here is that the fractional abundance of brown dwarfs should increase with stellar density, and should be lowest amongst the isolated population of young stars. It is worth noting that the fractional abundance of brown dwarfs actually de- creases in the highest stellar density bins as the stars in the cores of the stellar clusters are predominantly higher mass stars due to the ongoing (competitive) accretion there. 7 CONCLUSIONS We have investigated the formation of brown dwarfs in a numerical simulation of a self-gravitating turbulent molecu- lar cloud. We find that the brown dwarfs form, as do low- mass stars, due to the fragmentation of high-density gas that arises as it infalls into the gravitational potential of a stellar cluster. Approximately 23 per cent of the objects formed have final masses in the brown dwarf mass range al- though only ≈ 10 per cent have brown dwarf masses and have stopped mass accretion. The turbulent velocities present in the cloud do not con- tribute directly to the formation of the brown-dwarf mass fragments. Instead, these fragments form through the gravi- Figure 7. The fractional abundance of brown dwarfs is plot- ted against their local stellar density based on their tenth clos- est neighbour. The dashed line is for all brown-dwarf-mass sink- particles at the end of the simulation while the solid line only con- siders brown dwarf-mass sink-particles with low accretion rates such that they would remain brown dwarfs if they continued to accrete over the following free-fall time (6.5 × 105 years). The fractional abundance of brown dwarfs is low at low stellar densi- ties and peaks at high stellar densities inside clusters. The highest stellar densities also appear to have lower fractional abundances of brown dwarfs. they have low accretion rates and remain low-mass objects. Brown dwarfs and low-mass stars thus form in the same way from low Jeans mass fragments which subsequently accrete little mass. If ejections are not required, then the disc and binary properties of these objects need not be affected and should form a continuous distribution with slightly higher- mass stars. 6 OBSERVATIONAL SIGNATURES The brown dwarfs that form in the scenario described here form in an analogous manner as do very low-mass stars (Elmegreen 2004). There is nothing specific to being a brown dwarf that makes their formation distinct from stars. They form from gas which has low Jeans masses due to its com- pression as it enters a stellar cluster, and subsequent accre- tion is generally low due to the high infall velocity imparted from the cluster potential. There is no need for close interac- tions or ejections to ensure their low mass. This implies that the properties of brown dwarfs will generally resemble those of low-mass stars. As such, their circumstellar disc and mul- tiplicity properties should form a continuum with low-mass stars. This process can occur in any strong potential such as that of a small-N cluster where the Jeans mass becomes small and that the virial velocity limits subsequent accretion (Bonnell et al.1997, 2001; Bate et al.2002; Bonnell & Bate 2006). Ejections can occur but are not fundamental to the process. Clarke C. J., 1999, MNRAS, 307, 328 Clarke C. J., Harper-Clark E., Lodato G., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1543 Elmegreen B. G., 2004, MNRAS, 354, 367 Elmegreen B. G., Elmegreen D. M., 1978, ApJ, 220, 1051 Goodwin S. P., Whitworth A., 2007, A&A, 466, 943 Kitsionas S., Whitworth A. P., 2002, MNRAS, 330, 129 Kitsionas S., Whitworth A. P., 2007, MNRAS, 378, 507 Larson R. B., 1985, MNRAS, 214, 379 Larson R. B., 2005, MNRAS, 359, 211 Lubow S. H., Pringle J. E., 1993, MNRAS, 263, 701 Luhman K. L., Joergens V., Lada C., Muzerolle J., Pascucci I., White R., 2007, Protostars and Planets V, eds B. Reipurth et al., 443 Padoan P., Nordlund A., 2002, ApJ, 576, 870. Padoan P., Nordlund A., 2004) ApJ, 617, 559. Reipurth B., Clarke C., 2001, AJ, 122, 432. Scholz A., Jayawardhana R., Wood K., 2006, ApJ, 645, 1498 Stamatellos D., Hubber D. A., Whitworth A. P., 2007, MNRAS, 382, L30 Whitworth A., Bate M. R., Nordlund A., Reipurth B., Zinnecker H., 2007, Protostars and Planets V, eds B. Reipurth et al., 459 Whitworth A. P., Stamatellos D., 2006, A&A, 458, 817 Whitworth A. P., Zinnecker H., 2004, A&A, 427, 299 8 I. A. Bonnell et al. tational compression of gas as it infalls into a stellar cluster. This intrinsically 3-D compression produces high gas den- sities and thus low thermal Jeans masses in the range of brown dwarfs and low-mass stars. The tidal shear of the cluster, and the velocity imparted on the fragment from the cluster potential act to limit any subsequent mass increase due to accretion. There is no need for any subsequent ejec- tions to halt the accretion implying that the circumstellar disc and binary properties of brown dwarfs should form a continuum with low-mass stars. Brown dwarfs formed through this mechanism should be preferentially located in regions of high stellar density. The fractional abundance of brown dwarfs in stellar clusters is of order 25 per cent in highly clustered regions whereas it decrease to of order 10 per cent in isolated regions. This fraction is likely to increase somewhat due to subsequent ejections of brown dwarfs and low mass stars from the clus- ters. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge the contribution of the U.K. Astrophysi- cal Fluids Facility (UKAFF) and SUPA for providing the computational facilities for the simulations reported here. P.C.C. acknowledges support by the Deutsche Forschungsge- meinschaft (DFG) under grant KL 1358/5 and via the Son- derforschungsbereich (SFB) SFB 439, Galaxien im fruhen Universum. MRB is grateful for the support of a Philip Lev- erhulme Prize and a EURYI Award. This work, conducted as part of the award The formation of stars and planets: Radiation hydrodynamical and magnetohydrodynami- cal simulations made under the European Heads of Research Coun- cils and European Science Foundation EURYI (Eu- ropean Young Investigator) Awards scheme, was supported by funds from the Par- ticipating Organizations of EURYI and the EC Sixth Framework Programme. We would like to thank Chris Rudge and Richard West at the UK Astrophys- ical Fluid Facility (UKAFF) for their tireless assistance and enthusiasm during the completion of this work. Finally, we thank the referee for some useful comments which helped clarify the text. REFERENCES Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., 2005, MNRAS, 356,1201 Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Bromm V., 2002a, MNRAS, 332, 65 Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Price N. M., 1995, MNRAS, 277, 362. Bonnell I. A., 1999, The physics of star and planet formation, eds. Lada & Kyfalis, 479 Bonnell I. A., Bate M. R., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 488 Bonnell I. A., Bate M. R., Clarke C. J., & Pringle J. E., 1997, MNRAS, 85, 201 Bonnell I. A., Bate M. R., Clarke C. J., & Pringle J. E., 2001, MNRAS, 323, 785 Bonnell I. A., Clarke C. J., Bate M. R., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1296 Bonnell I.A., Larson R.B., Zinnecker H., 2006, in Protostars and Planets V, eds B. Reipurth et al., p. 149 Bonnell I. A., Vine S. G., Bate M. R., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 735 Burgasser A. J., Reid I. N., Siegler N., Close L., Allen P., Lowrance P., Gizis J., 2007, Protostars and Planets V, eds B. Reipurth et al., 427 Clark P. C., Bonnell I. A., 2005, MNRAS, 361, 2
astro-ph/0311446	1	0311	2003-11-19T10:25:05	Rapid N_H Changes in NGC 4151	[ "astro-ph" ]	We have analyzed two long BeppoSAX observations of the bright Seyfert galaxy NGC 4151, searching for short timescale (10-200 ksec) X-ray spectral variability. The light curve of a softness ratio, chosen as most sensitive to pinpoint changes of the column density of the absorbing gas along the line of sight, shows significant variations. We try to model these variations by performing a detailed, time resolved, spectral analysis. We find significant, large (factors of 1.5-6) variations of the absorber column densities on time scales of 40-200 ksec. These values are 10-100 times shorter than those found by Risaliti et al. 2002 in a sample of Seyfert 2 galaxies, and provide strong constraints on the geometry of the obscuring medium.	astro-ph	astro-ph	RAPID NH CHANGES IN NGC 4151 S. Puccettia b, G. Risalitic, d, F. Fiorea, M. Elvisd, F. Nicastrod, G. C. Perolae, M. Capalbif. aUniversit´a degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy bINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Monteporzio Catone, Italy cINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze, Italy dHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, USA eUniversit´a degli Studi di Roma Tre, Roma, Italy f ASI Science Data Center, c/o ESA-ESRIN, Frascati, Italy We have analyzed two long BeppoSAX observations of the bright Seyfert galaxy NGC 4151, searching for short timescale (∼10-200 ksec) X-ray spectral variability. The light curve of a softness ratio, chosen as most sensitive to pinpoint changes of the column density of the absorbing gas along the line of sight, shows significant variations. We try to model these variations by performing a detailed, time resolved, spectral analysis. We find significant, large (factors of 1.5-6) variations of the absorber column densities on time scales of 40-200 ksec. These values are 10-100 times shorter than those found by Risaliti et al. 2002 in a sample of Seyfert 2 galaxies, and provide strong constraints on the geometry of the obscuring medium. 1. Introduction 2. Light curves analysis The geometry of the obscuring matter in Ac- tive Galactic Nuclei, predicted by unified models [1], is still unclear. The study of variability of the absorbing column density (NH ) in these ob- jects, provides invaluable informations on the size and location of the absorber. Recently, Risaliti et al. [2] found NH variability on time scales from ∼ 2 month to ∼ 5 years in nearly all the objects belonging to a sample of bright, Compton-thin Seyfert 2 galaxies with multiple X-ray observa- tions. This variability suggests that the absorber could be much closer to the nucleus than usually assumed. To further investigate this issue, we have an- alyzed two BeppoSAX long observations of the brightest Seyfert galaxy, NGC 4151, and present here some preliminary results. The two BeppoSAX observations were per- formed on 2001 December, 18 and 1996 July, 6 with the Narrow Field Instruments: LECS (0.1- 10 keV), MECS (1.3-10 keV), and PDS (13-200 keV). The total absorbing column density mea- sured in NGC4151 by HEAO1, EXOSAT, Ginga, ROSAT and ASCA [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] ranges from a few 1022 cm−2 to a few 1023 cm−2. Since the corresponding photoelectric cut-off lies in the 2-4 keV energy range, we have chosen to analyze the light curves of the count rate in the bands 2-4 keV (MECS), 6-10 keV (MECS) and of their softness ratio (see Figures 1 and 2), to investigate whether NH variations might have occurred within each observation. We also analyzed the light curve of the count rate in the 15-200 keV band (PDS) to monitor the continuum. From the analysis of these light curves we have selected some time in- tervals where we find indications that NH might have undergone significant changes. These inter- 2 vals are shown and labelled in figures 1 and 2. To quantify the spectral variations we have then performed a detailed spectral analysis of these stretches of data. A B C M MECS 2.-4. keV MECS 6.-10. keV 2.-4. keV/6.-10. keV 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 4 3 2 1 0 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 A B C MECS 2.-4. keV MECS 6.-10. keV 2.-4. keV/6.-10. keV PDS 15.-200. keV Time[s] 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 0 Time[s] PDS 15.-200. keV Figure 2. Same panels of figure 1 but for the 1996 July 6 observation. Figure 1. Light curves of 2001 December 18 observation. From top to bottom: MECS 2-4 keV count rate, MECS 6-10 keV count rate, 2- 4 keV/6-10 keV softness ratio, PDS 15-200 keV count rate. The capital letters at the top of the figure, indicate the time intervals selected for a time-resolved spectral analysis. 3. Spectral analysis Standard data reduction was performed using the SAXDAS software package version 2.0 fol- lowing Fiore, Guainazzi & Grandi [11]. Spec- tral fits were performed using the XSPEC 11.2.0 software package and public response matrices as from the 1999 December release. The PDS data were reduced using the "variable risetime thresh- old" technique to reject particle background [11]. LECS and MECS spectra were rebinned follow- ing two criteria:a) to sample the energy resolution of the detectors with three channels at all ener- gies whenever possible, and to obtain at least 20 counts per energy channel. Constant factors have been introduced in the fitting models in order to take into account the intercalibration systematics between the instruments [11]. The model adopted for the analysis has the following components: 1. A power-law with an exponential high- energy cut-off; 2. a neutral Compton reflection component (modelled with PEXRAV [3]); 3. a narrow iron Kα emission line with energy set to 6.38 keV in the observer frame; 4. two components for the soft excess emis- sion: a thermal component, and a power law, reflection component. 5. two components for the intrinsic absorber, both assumed neutral: NH1 which covers the nucleus totally; NH2 which covers the nucleus only in part, with a covering factor CV [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The absorber is com- pleted with the line of sight column den- sity through the Galaxy (NHgal =2.17×1020 cm−2[12]). Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the results for the two observations. In the 2001 December, 18 ob- servation, we find that from A to B to C, both absorbers and the photon index do not show sta- tistically significative changes. From C to M the two absorbers NH1 and NH2 change at a confi- dence level ∼ 90% by a factor of 2 and 3.3 re- spectively, while the photon index is constant at a confidence level ∼ 99%. If the covering factor CV is kept constant throughout the fit the ampli- tude of the variations of NH1 and NH2 is reduced to a factor 1.4 and 2 respectively. The variations occur on a timescale of 100-150 ksec. In the 1996 July, 6 observation, we find that from A to B both absorbers undergo changes at a confidence level ∼ 90%, while from A to C the ab- sorbers change at a confidence level > 99%. From A to B to C, the photon index is again statisti- cally consistent with a constant. The amplitude of the variation of NH1 and NH2 is a factor 6 and 5 respectively. If the covering factor CV is kept constant throughout the fit the amplitude of the variations of NH1 and NH2 is reduced to a factor 4 and 3 respectively. The variations occur on a timescale of ≈ 30 ksec from A to B and ≈ 200 ksec from A to C. 4. Conclusion We have performed a detailed time-resolved spectral study of two long BeppoSAX observa- tions of the Seyfert galaxy NGC4151. We find strong evidences for spectral variability which we model in terms of variations of two absorbing screens. The timescales of these variations are be- tween 40 ksec and 200 ksec, 10-100 times shorter than the typical timescales found by Risaliti et al.[2] in a sample of Compton thin Seyfert 2 galax- ies. If we associate these timescales to a crossing time, the resulting linear size would be of about 3 Figure 3. From top to bottom: 68, 90, 99% χ2 confidence contours for NH2 versus NH1 , NH2 ver- sus photon index Γ and NH1 versus Γ, for the spectra corresponding to the intervals A, B, C and M in the 2001 December, 18 observation. 4 one light day, which is the size of the innermost part of the Broad Line Region, as inferred from reverberation mapping in NGC 4151. This inter- pretation is supported by the argument, used by Risaliti et al.[2], which assume that the absorb- ing medium might be made up of spherical clouds moving with Keplerian velocities around the cen- tral black hole. This requires that the cloud gas density is of the order of 109 cm−3, typical of Broad Line Region clouds [13]. REFERENCES 1. Antonucci, R. 1993 ARA&A, 31, 47 2. Risaliti, G., Elvis, M., Nicastro, F. 2002 ApJ, 571, 234 3. Magdziarz, P. & Zdziarski, A. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 837 4. Holt, S. S., Mushotzky, R. F., Boldt, E. A. et al. 1980, ApJ, 241L, 13 5. Perola, G.C., Piro, L., Altamore, A. et al. 1986, ApJ, 306, 508 6. Fiore, F., Perola, G. C., Romano, M. 1990, MNRAS, 243, 522 7. Weaver, K.A., Yaqoob, T., Holt, S.S. et al. 1994ApJ,436L, 27 8. Piro, L., Nicastro, F., Feroci, M. 1998, axrs.symp, 481 9. Wang, J.-X., Zhou, Y.-Y., Wang, T.-G. 1999, ApJ, 523L, 129 10. Zdziarski, A., Leighly, K.M., Matsuoka, M. et al. 2002, ApJ, 573, 505 1999, Handbook for 11. Fiore, F., Guainazzi, M. & Grandi, Bep- analysis, P. poSAX ftp://ftp.asdc.asi.it/pub/sax/doc/software docs/saxabc v1.2.ps.gz or http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/sax/abc/saxabc/ spectral NFI 12. Murphy, E.M., Lockman, F.J., Laor, A. et al. 1996 ApJS, 105, 369 13. Blandford, R., Netzer, A. and Woltjer, L. 1990: Active Galactic Nuclei, Springer-Verlag edt. Figure 4. From top to bottom: 68, 90, 99% χ2 confidence contours for NH2 versus NH1 , NH2 ver- sus photon index Γ and NH1 versus Γ, for the spectra corresponding to the intervals A, B and C in the 1996 July, 6, observation.
astro-ph/0510550	1	0510	2005-10-19T07:36:31	Dark energy with polytropic equation of state	[ "astro-ph" ]	Equation of state parameter plays a significant role for guessing the real nature of dark energy. In the present paper polytropic equation of state $p=\omega\rho^n$ is chosen for some of the kinematical $\Lambda$-models viz., $\Lambda \sim (\dot a/a)^2$, $\Lambda \sim \ddot a/a$ and $\Lambda \sim \rho$. Although in dust cases ($\omega=0$) closed form solutions show no dependency on the polytropic index $n$, but in non-dust situations some new possibilities are opened up including phantom energy with supernegative ($\omega<-1$) equation of state parameter.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Dark energy with polytropic equation of state Satyabharati Vidyapith, Kolkata 700 126, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India Utpal Mukhopadhyay Saibal Ray Department of Physics, Barasat Government College, Kolkata 700 124, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India and Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, PO Box 4, Pune 411 007, India; e-mail:[email protected] (Dated: September 24, 2018) Equation of state parameter plays a significant role for guessing the real nature of dark energy. In the present paper polytropic equation of state p = ωρn is chosen for some of the kinematical Λ-models viz., Λ ∼ ( a/a)2, Λ ∼ a/a and Λ ∼ ρ. Although in dust cases (ω = 0) closed form solutions show no dependency on the polytropic index n, but in non-dust situations some new possibilities are opened up including phantom energy with supernegative (ω < −1) equation of state parameter. PACS numbers: 04.20.-q, 04.20.Jb, 98.80.Jk I. INTRODUCTION Ever since the discovery of an accelerating Universe through SN Ia observations [1, 2], scientists are search- ing for the cause behind this acceleration. It has been suspected that some kind of yet unknown energy is re- sponsible for injecting the right amount of energy to the Universe for changing it to an accelerating one from a decelerating phase. Scientific community has coined the name dark energy for this unknown energy. Various types of models have been proposed for approximating this dark energy so far [3, 4]. It is observed that equation of state parameter plays a crucial role in understanding the actual nature of dark energy [5]. Till now, most of the models of Λ (the so- called cosmological constant of Einstein and a represen- tative symbol for dark energy) with dynamic character have relied on the barotropic equation of state with wide range of values of the equation of state parameter ω, viz., ω = 0 (for dust filled Universe), ω = 1/3 (for radiation), ω = −1 (for vacuum), −1 < ω < 0 (for quintessence) and ω < −1 (for phantom energy). But, all these models are plagued by some shortcomings. For instance, models with ω = 0 and 1/3 show an excess [6] or very low [3] age of the Universe while the stiff-fluid model, in spite of its nice agreement with the present age of the Universe [7], is not, in general, accepted as the real nature of the present Universe. In this circumstances, it is not unrea- sonable to think of an equation of state different from the barotropic one. This has prompted us to investigate the reaction of some of Λ models when polytropic equation of state is chosen. Polytropic equation of state has been used in various astrophysical situations such as in the case of Lane- Emden models [8, 9]. In the present investigation it is used in cosmological realm. As test models we have selected Λ ∼ ( a/a)2, Λ ∼ a/a and Λ ∼ ρ models -- the same three kinematical Λ-models which were chosen in one of our previous works [10] under the barotropic equation of state. Here Sections 2 and 3 deal with the field equations and their solutions under three different Λ-models while various physical implications of the present work are discussed in Section 4. II. EINSTEIN FIELD EQUATIONS The Einstein field equations are Rij − 1 2 Rgij = −8πG(cid:20)T ij − Λ 8πG gij(cid:21) (1) where cosmological constant Λ is assumed as a function of time, viz., Λ = Λ(t) and the velocity of light c in vacuum is unity when expressed in relativistic units. For the spherically symmetric Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric ds2 = −dt2 + a(t)2(cid:20) dr2 1 − kr2 + r2(dθ2 + sin2θdφ2)(cid:21) (2) where a is the scale factor and k, the curvature constant −1, 0, +1 respectively for open, flat and close models of the Universe, the Einstein field equations (1) take the forms as a(cid:19)2 (cid:18) a = 8πG 3 ρ + Λ 3 , a a = − 4πG 3 (ρ + 3p) + Λ 3 . (3) (4) As various observational results [11] and inflation theory indicate that the Universe is flat so we have assumed here k = 0. Let us choose the polytropic equation of state p = wρn (5) where equation of state parameter w can take the constant values 0, 1/3, −1 and +1 respectively for the dust, radiation, vacuum fluid and stiff fluid and n is the polytropic index. III. PARTICULAR SOLUTIONS A. Λ ∼ ( a/a)2 If we use the ansatz a(cid:19)2 Λ = 3α(cid:18) a (6) where α is a constant, then using equation (6) we get from equation (3) a(cid:19)2 3(cid:18) a a(cid:19)2 − 3α(cid:18) a = 8πGρ (7) which takes the form for density as follows: 1. Dust case (ω = 0) 2 For pressureless dust, ω = 0 = A and equation (13) becomes, dy da + (2 − 2n)B a y = 0. Solving equation (14) we get, y = C1a(2n−2)B C1 being an integration constant. This immediately yields da dt = C2a−B (14) (15) (16) 1/(2−2n). where C2 = C1 Integrating equation (16) and using the initial condition that a = 0 for t = 0 we get, a(t) = C3(cid:20) 3(1 − α) 2 (cid:21)2/3(1−α) t2/3(1−α) (17) ρ = 3(1 − α) a(cid:19)2 8πG (cid:18) a . (8) where C3 = C2 which provides the Hubble parameter as 1/(B+1) being an integration constant, Using equation (5) and equation (6) we get from equation (4) H(t) = a a = 2 3(1 − α) 1 t . (18) (19) (20) 3(cid:18) a a(cid:19)2 a(cid:19) = −12πGωρn − 4πGρ + 3α(cid:18) a (9) which, on simplification, yields a2n−1 d2a dt2 + A(cid:18) da dt(cid:19)2n dt(cid:19)2 + Ba2n−2(cid:18) da = 0 (10) where A = [3nω(1 − α)n]/[2n(4πG)n−1] and B = (1 − 3α)/2. Let us substitute, z = da/dt for which the equation (10) reduces to z1−2n dz da + Aa1−2n + z2−2n B a = 0. (11) If we put, z2−2n = y, then differentiating it with respect to the scale factor a, we get z1−2n dz da = 1 (2 − 2n) dy da . (12) Hence equation (11), by use of equation (12) becomes, dy da + (2 − 2n)B a y = −(2 − 2n)Aa1−2n. (13) Now let us solve equation (13) in some particular cases for getting insight into the physical situations. Therefore from (8), we get ρ(t) = 1 6πG(1 − α) 1 t2 . Also, from equation (6), we obtain Λ(t) = 4α 3(1 − α)2 1 t2 . Thus, it is interesting to note that in dust case, ex- pressions for ρ(t) and Λ(t) as well as t dependent part of a(t) are independent of n. Moreover, a(t), ρ(t) and Λ(t) follow the same power law with t as those in the dust case with barotropic equation of state (i.e. n = 1) [10]. But, surprisingly, equation (17) becomes undefined for n = 1 since C3 contains the factor (2 − 2n) in the denominator. 2. Non-dust case (ω 6= 0) When ω 6= 0, then A 6= 0 and hence equation (11) is a linear equation. Multiplying equation (11) by integrating factor a(2−2n)B and solving the resulting equation we get, y = − Aa(2−2n)B B + 1 (21) which yields after substituting the value of y B. Λ ∼ ρ da dt = − A (B + 1) a. (22) For this model we use the ansatz 3 (31) (32) (33) Λ = 8πGγρ where γ is a constant. Then, from equation (3) we get ρ = 3 a(cid:19)2 8πG(γ + 1) (cid:18) a . Using (5) we get from (4) 3(cid:18) a a(cid:19) = −12πGωρn − 4πGρ + 8πGγρ By solving equation (22) we get our solution for the scale factor in the form a(t) = C4exp[(−ω)1/2(1−n) 8πG 3(1 − α) ]1/2t (23) where C4 is integration constant. It is clear from equation (23) that no real value of a(t) is possible if ω is positive. So, ω must be negative. Putting specifically, ω = −1 in equation (23) we obtain a(t) = C4exp[8πG/3(1 − α)]1/2t. (24) Now, ω = −1 means a vacuum fluid. So, for vacuum fluid, we get an exponential solution independent of n. But, if ω < −1, then scale factor depends on n. Now, ω < −1 corresponds to a supernegative equation of state and hence the idea of phantom energy comes into the pic- ture. Also, during inflation, the Universe underwent an exponential expansion. So, for non-dust case our solution reflects an inflationary scenario which may be due to ei- ther vacuum energy or quintessence or phantom energy. Also, from equation (24) we get, H = (cid:20) 8πG 3(1 − α)(cid:21)1/2 . From equation (8) and (6) we get respectively ρ(t) = 1, Λ(t) = 8πGα 1 − α . (25) (26) (27) Therefore, the cosmic matter and vacuum energy densi- ties are given by Ωm = 8πGρ 3H 2 = 1 − α, ΩΛ = Λ 3H 2 = α. (28) (29) So that, equations (29) and (30), immediately provide Ωm + ΩΛ = 1. (30) Thus, we find that although polytropic equation of state yields interesting result by invoking the idea of phantom energy for non-dust case, yet it presents us some unac- ceptable situations like constant H (equation (25)) and constant ρ (equation (26)). A possible explanation of this will be discussed afterwards. However, the cosmic matter and vacuum energy density parameters satisfy the well-known relation Ωm + ΩΛ = 1 for flat Universe (Ωk = 0). which, on simplification, yields the differential equation a(2n−1) d2a dt2 + D(cid:18) da dt(cid:19)2n dt(cid:19)2 − Ea(2n−2)(cid:18) da = 0 (34) where D = ω3n/[2n(γ + 1)n(4πG)n−1] and E = (2γ − 1)/2(γ + 1). Substituting da/dt = u and then v = u2−2n equation (34) becomes 1 (2 − 2n) dv da − E a v = −Da1−2n. (35) 1. Dust case (ω = 0) For pressureless dust case D=0, so that equation (35) reduces to dv da + (2n − 2) E a v = 0. (36) Solving equation (36) in the same manner as in the pre- vious model, we get our solution set as a(t) = C5(cid:20) 3 2(γ + 1)(cid:21)2(γ+1)/3 t2(γ+1)/3 (37) where C5 is a constant. H(t) = 2(γ + 1) 3 1 t , ρ(t) = (γ + 1) 6πG 1 t2 , Λ(t) = 4γ(γ + 1) 3 1 t2 . (38) (39) (40) Also, we can calculate for the cosmic and vacuum energy densities which, respectively, are Ωm = 1/(γ + 1) and ΩΛ = γ/(γ + 1). Therefore, Ωm + ΩΛ = 1 and hence γ = ΩΛ/Ωm. Thus, we find that for this model also a(t), ρ(t) and Λ(t) follow the same relationship with time as in the barotropic case [10] and γ is related to matter and vacuum energy densities by the same relation as in the barotropic case [10]. 2. Non-dust case (ω 6= 0) When ω 6= 0, then D 6= 0. In this case, following the same procedure as in the Λ ∼ ( a/a)2 model, it is easy to show that no real solution is possible for ω > 0. For ω = −1, we have a(t) = C6exp(cid:20) 3 8πG(γ + 1)(cid:21)1/2 t where C6 is a constant. H = (cid:20) 3 8πG(γ + 1)(cid:21)1/2 , ρ(t) = (cid:20) 3 8πG(γ + 1)(cid:21)2 , Λ(t) = 9γ 8πG(γ + 1)2 . (41) (42) (43) (44) 4 Here we find that in non-dust case, solutions are possible for vacuum fluid (ω = −1), quintessence (−1 < ω < 0) and phantom energy (ω < −1). For vacuum fluid, solution is independent of n whereas for quintessence and phantom energy solution depends on n. In this case also, γ is found to be the ratio of vacuum energy density and matter energy density. For physical reality, γ > −1 to be imposed on the solutions. C. Λ ∼ a/a If we use the supposition Λ = β(a/a) = β( H + H 2), then from equation (3) we get, 3H 2 = 8πGρ+β( H +H 2). Therefore ρ = 1 8πG [(3 − β)H 2 − β H]. (45) from (4) we have, 3( H + H 2) = Then, using (5), −12πGωρn − 4πGρ + β( H + H 2) which on simplification becomes 3 2 h(3 − β)H 2 + (2 − β) Hi = − 12πGω (8πG)n [(3 − β)H 2 − β H]n. (46) (52) (53) Λ(t) = β(β − 2) (β − 3)2 1 t2 , H(t) = (cid:18) β − 2 β − 3(cid:19) 1 t . For simplifying equation (46), let us investigate in some particular cases. If we specifically choose n = 0 (i.e. p = ω), then equation (46) reduces to (2 − β) H + (3 − β)H 2 = −8πGω. (47) 1. Dust case (ω = 0) For pressureless dust (ω = 0) equation (47) becomes (2 − β) dH dt + (3 − β)H 2 = 0. (48) By solving equation (48) and using the initial condition that a = 0 when t = 0 we get da dt = a(cid:18) 2 − β 3 − β(cid:19) 1 t . (49) Then from equation (49) we finally get our solution set as a(t) = C7t(β−2)/(β−3) (50) where C7 is a constant. Thus, for n = 0, the solution set is same for a(t), ρ(t) and Λ(t) as obtained by Ray and Mukhopadhyay [10] in the dust case with barotropic equation of state. 2. Non-dust case (ω 6= 0) In non-dust case, equation (47) can be written as (2 − β) dH dt + (3 − β)H 2 = −8πGω. (54) By solving equation (47) and remembering that H = 0 when t = 0 we get da dt = νa tan(µt) (55) ρ(t) = 1 4πG (cid:18) β − 2 β − 3(cid:19) 1 t2 , (51) where µ = [8πGω(3 − β)/(β − 2)]1/2 and ν = [8πGω/(3 − β)]1/2. After solving equation (55) we have a(t) = C8(cid:20)sec {8πGω(3 − β)}1/2 (β − 2) t(cid:21) {8πGω/(3−β)}1/2 ,(56) 5 ρ(t) = (8πGω)3/2(3 − β)1/2 8πG(β − 2)2 (cid:20){8πGω(3 − β)}1/2tan2 {8πGω(3 − β)}1/2 (β − 2) t − βsec2 {8πGω(3 − β)}1/2 (β − 2) t(cid:21) , (57) Λ(t) = (8πGω)3/2 (β − 2)2 β(cid:20)(3 − β)1/2sec2 {8πGω(3 − β)}1/2 (β − 2) t + (8πGω)1/2tan2 {8πGω(3 − β)}1/2 (β − 2) t(cid:21) , (58) H(t) = 8πGω (β − 2) tan {8πGω(3 − β)}1/2 (β − 2) t. (59) From the above solution set, it is clear that if ω > 0, then for real a(t), ρ(t), Λ(t) and H(t), β must be less than 3. For negative ω (i.e., for vacuum fluid, quintessence and phantom energy) real values of a(t) and H(t) can be obtained, but Λ(t) and ρ(t) become imaginary. If (β − 3) = 0, then ρ(t), Λ(t) and H(t) are zero but a(t) is undefined. Since tant and sect are both increasing functions of t, then a(t), Λ(t) and H(t) increase with time. Increasing a(t) supports the idea of an accelerating Universe, but increasing Λ(t) and H(t) are contrary to the present status of those two parameters. For t = 0, we get respectively from equations (56) - (59) the following physical parameters: a(t) = C8, (60) ρ(t) = −β 1 (8πGω)3/2(3 − β)1/2 8πG (β − 2)2 , (61) Λ(t) = (8πGω)3/2 (β − 2)2 β(3 − β)1/2, H(t) = 0. (62) (63) Since a(t) assumes a constant value for t = 0, then our model hints at the existence of some kind of quantum fluctuation at the time of Big Bang. Now, equation (61) tells us that for physically valid ρ, ω > 0 and β < 0. For a negative β we get an attractive Λ. So, as a whole this model also presents some interesting as well as awkward cosmological picture. IV. DISCUSSION Present investigation reveals that for pressureless dust, all the three models reflect the same result as obtained by Ray and Mukhopadhyay [10] in dust case with barotropic equation of state. But, in non-dust cases (i.e., ω 6= 0), Λ ∼ ( a/a)2 and Λ ∼ ρ models show exponential expansion of the Universe for negative ω whereas no real situation is possible for ω > 0. Thus, we can say that for dust-filled Universe, there is no distinction between barotropic and polytropic equations of state. This is not at all unexpected because for ω = 0, we have p = 0, whatever may be the value of n in the equation of state. Also, non-dust cases for all the three models present us some unpleasant results in terms of constant H and ρ. These situations can be explained if we assume that the non-dust cases reflect the picture of early Universe when inflation occurred due to the presence of quintessence (−1 < ω < 0) or vacuum fluid (ω = −1) or phantom energy (ω < −1). So, using polytropic equation of state it has been possible to show that non-dust cases admit the presence of a driving force behind inflation in the form of either quintessence or vacuum fluid or phantom energy and in the dust cases there is no distinction between different equation of states. Moreover, present models do not depend on any particular value of n in the polytropic equation of state. This proves the generality of the present investigation. Acknowledgments One of the authors (SR) would like to express his grat- itude to the authority of IUCAA, Pune for providing him the Associateship Programme under which a part of this work was carried out. 6 [1] A G Riess et al Astron. J. 116 1009 (1998). [2] S Perlmutter et al Nat. 391 51 (1998). [3] J M Overduin and F I Cooperstock Phys. Rev. D 58 043506 (1998). [4] V Sahni and A Starobinsky Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 9, 373 (2000). [5] R P Kirshner Science 300 5627 (2003). [6] R G Vishwakarma Class. Quan. Grav. 17 3833 (2000). [7] S Ray and U Mukhopadhyay astro-ph/0411257. [8] R N Tiwari , J R Rao and R R Kanakamedala Phys. Rev. D 34 1205 (1986). [9] S Ray Astrophys. Space Sci. 280 345 (2002). [10] S Ray and U Mukhopadhyay astro-ph/0407295. [11] P de Bernardis et al Nat. 404 955 (2000).
astro-ph/9705195	2	9705	1997-09-29T18:17:25	A model independent lower limit on the number of Gamma Ray Burst hosts from repeater statistics	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present a general statistical analysis of Gamma Ray Bursts embedded in a host population. If no host generates more than one observed burst, then we show that there is a model independent lower bound on the number of hosts, $H$, of the form $H > c B^2$, where B is the number of observed bursts, and $c$ is a constant of order one which depends on the confidence level (CL) attached to the bound. An analysis by Tegmark et al. (1996) shows that the BATSE 3B catalog of 1122 bursts is consistent with no repeaters being present, and assuming that this is indeed the case, our result implies a host population with at least H=1.2x10^6 members. Without the explicit assumption of no repeaters, a Bayesian analysis based on the results of Tegmark et al. (1996) can be performed which gives the weaker bound of $H>1.7\times 10^5$ at the 90% CL. In the light of the non-detection of identifiable hosts in the small error-boxes associated with transient counterparts to GRBs, this result gives a model independent lower bound to the number of any rare or exotic hosts. If in fact GRBs are found to be associated with a particular sub-class of galaxies, then an analysis along the lines presented here can be used to place a lower bound on the fraction of galaxies in this sub-class. Another possibility is to treat galaxy clusters (rather than individual galaxies) as the host population, provided that the angular size of each cluster considered is less than the resolution of the detector. Finally, if repeaters are ever detected in a statistically significant manner, this analysis can be readily adapted to find upper and lower limits on $H$.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A model independent lower limit on the number of Gamma Ray Burst hosts from repeater statistics Anupam Singh1 and Mark Srednicki2 Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 ABSTRACT We present a general statistical analysis of Gamma Ray Bursts embedded in a host population. If no host generates more than one observed burst, then we show that there is a model independent lower bound on the number of hosts, H, of the form H > cB2, where B is the number of observed bursts, and c is a constant of order one which depends on the confidence level (CL) attached to the bound. An analysis by Tegmark et al. (1996) shows that the BATSE 3B catalog of 1122 bursts is consistent with no repeaters being present, and assuming that this is indeed the case, our result implies a host population with at least H = 1.2 × 106 members. Without the explicit assumption of no repeaters, a Bayesian analysis based on the results of Tegmark et al. (1996) can be performed which gives the weaker bound of H > 1.7 × 105 at the 90% CL. In the light of the non-detection of identifiable hosts in the small error-boxes associated with transient counterparts to GRBs, this result gives a model independent lower bound to the number of any rare or exotic hosts. If in fact GRBs are found to be associated with a particular sub-class of galaxies, then an analysis along the lines presented here can be used to place a lower bound on the fraction of galaxies in this sub-class. Another possibility is to treat galaxy clusters (rather than individual galaxies) as the host population, provided that the angular size of each cluster considered is less than the resolution of the detector. Finally, if repeaters are ever detected in a statistically significant manner, this analysis can be readily adapted to find upper and lower limits on H. 7 9 9 1 p e S 9 2 2 v 5 9 1 5 0 7 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Subject headings: gamma rays: bursts 1E-mail: [email protected] 2E-mail: [email protected] -- 2 -- 1. Introduction Recently there have been exciting developments in the observational investigation of the nature of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) and the hosts in which they may originate. (Several excellent reviews of GRBs are available; see e.g. Blaes [1994]; Piran [1995].) For GRB970228, an afterglow was detected in the X-Ray and optical wavebands (Van Paradijs et al. 1997), and Metzger et al. (1997) have identified absorption lines in the spectra of the optical transient associated with GRB970508. Their observations put the transient beyond a redshift of z = 0.835. If confirmed, this would establish that GRBs are cosmological. If so, then this opens the door to their use as tools for probing cosmological issues such as structure formation (Piran & Singh 1997). The latest observations herald a new era of more precise, useful information about GRBs. The counterparts in the X-ray and optical wavebands allow one to get among other things a more precise location of the bursting source. Further, one can perform a detailed and intensive survey of the neighboring region of space to seek out the host population in which the GRBs are embedded. So far, in spite of exhaustive searches, statistical analysis, and the accompanying debate (Fenimore et al. 1993; Larson, McLean & Becklin 1996; Schaefer et al. 1997; Blaes et al. 1997; Kolatt & Piran 1996; Hurley et al. 1997), GRBs have not clearly and unambiguously been associated with any other well-known population of astronomical objects. In particular, no known or identifiable galaxy has been associated with either of the two GRBs for which transient counterparts have enabled a small error-box. Regarding repetitions of GRBs from the same host, while there was an early claim of evidence for this by Quashnock & Lamb (1993), their analysis was called into question by Narayan & Piran (1993). More recently, Tegmark et al. (1996) concluded that the data is consistent with no repetition of GRBs. Thus all of the recent data has not yet resolved the mystery of the nature of the host population in which GRB sources are embedded. It is therefore important to deduce all possible constraints which can be placed on the host population; model-independent constraints are particularly valuable. Obviously, there must be at least as many hosts as there have been GRBs, assuming no repeaters. This is clearly not a significant constraint; the total number of galaxies is about 109, corresponding to about 10−6 bursts per galaxy per year. It is possible, however, that the host population consists of exotic or otherwise rare cosmological objects. In this Letter, we perform a statistical analysis which demonstrates that, if a total of B bursts have been seen, and we assume that there are no repeaters, then the number of hosts H is likely to exceed cB2, where c is a numerical constant which depends on the desired confidence level and the precise form of the statistic (e.g., choice of the prior distribution in a Bayesian -- 3 -- analysis), but not on any details of the GRB model. If we do not make the assumption of no repeaters, but instead appropriately weight the possibilities based on observational data, then the lower bound is reduced to Hmin ∼ B2/hN2i, where hN2i is the expected number of repeaters in the data. In this analysis, a "host" is any object whose angular size is much less than the resolution of the detector. The BATSE data is consistent with no repeaters in the analyzed catalog of 1122 bursts. An analysis by Tegmark et al. (1996) shows that the number of repeaters N2 is less than 10 at the 95% CL. If we assume that there are in fact no repeaters in this catalog, then we can conclude that the the population of hosts from which the GRBs may be originating should contain at least H = 1.2 × 106 members. This implies that about 0.1% of the total number of galaxies could be hosts, if GRBs are embedded in galaxies. This could be a significant constraint if GRBs are found to be associated with a specific sub-class of galaxies. This constraint would also be significant if ongoing searches for potential objects within the error boxes of the transients fails to turn up identifiable normal galaxies or other well-known and abundant astronomical objects. Furthermore, if repeaters are ever detected in a statistically significant manner, our analysis can be readily adapted to find upper and lower limits on the number of hosts H. We now turn to the statistical analysis of this problem which allows us to draw the advertised conclusions. 2. The General Statistical Analysis We suppose that there is a population of H hosts, each of which is producing burst bursts at an individual rate of γi, i = 1, . . . , H, and that each of these hosts has been observed for an amount of time ti. Then the number of bursts which have been observed from each host is expected to be Ai = γiti. Call the actual number of observed bursts from each host Bi, and the total number of observed bursts B ≡ PH i=1 Bi. We assume that the bursts from each host are uncorrelated, so that the probability of observing Bi bursts from host i is given by a Poisson distribution P (BiAi) = ABi i exp(−Ai) Bi! . (1) Then the probability that a total of B bursts are observed is P (BA, H) = B XB1=0 . . . B XBH =0 δB1+...+BH ,B P (B1A1) . . . P (BHAH) -- 4 -- = (AH)B exp(−AH) B! , (2) where A is the average value A ≡ (1/H)PH i=1 Ai. We wish to calculate that probability that B bursts are seen, but that there are no repetitions; this is given by P (B, no rep{Ai}, H) = 1 XB1=0 . . . 1 XBH =0 δB1+...+BH ,B P (B1A1) . . . P (BHAH) (3) To simplify the calculation, we first treat the idealized situation in which Ai = A for each host. In this case, eq. (3) becomes P (B, no repA, H) = H! B!(H − B)! AB exp(−AH) , (4) The probability that no repetitions are seen, given that B bursts are observed, is given by the ratio P (no repB, A, H) = = P (B, no repA, H) P (BA, H) H! , H B(H − B)! (5) which we see is independent of A. Assuming H ≫ B ≫ 1, and using Stirling's formula for the factorials, we get P (no repB, A, H) = exp(−B2/2H) . (6) This is our key result. It tells us that we are unlikely to have seen no repetitions among B bursts if H is significantly smaller that B2. This can be made more precise by using a Bayesian analysis; see, e.g., Loredo and Wasserman (1995). Assuming that no repetitions are seen, the probability that the number of hosts is between H and H + dH is proportional to the likelihood P (no repB, A, H) times a prior distribution; if we make the standard scale-invariant choice dH/H with an upper cutoff at Hmax = 109, we find that H > B2 with a confidence level of approximately 90% (the exact value depends weakly on B and Hmax). If some hosts generate repeat bursts, the analysis above is changed somewhat. Let Nν be the number of hosts which generated ν bursts each; then H = N0 + N1 + N2 + . . . and B = N1 + 2N2 + 3N3 + . . .. We assume N0 ≫ N1 ≫ N2,3,.... Then eq. (5) is replaced with P (N2, N3, . . .B, A, H) = = H! B! H −B (0!)N0N0! . . . (ν!)Nν Nν! . . . (B2/2H)N2 N2! exp(−B2/2H) exp(−2N 2 2 /B)δN30δN40 . . . . (7) -- 5 -- Terms with Nν 6= 0 for ν ≥ 3 are suppressed by at least one factor of B/H. Henceforth, we set N3 = N4 = . . . = 0. Let us now consider what can be deduced from our formulas when they are applied to the BATSE 3B catalog of B = 1122 bursts. First we will examine the results of Tegmark et al (1996) concerning repeaters. To gain an analytic understanding of these results, we will treat the simplified case in which the beam-width σ is the same for every burst; then their statistic R becomes B j−1 R = 1 2B Xi=1 Xi=1 exp(−θ2 ij/4σ2) , (8) where θij is the angle on the sky between bursts i and j. We now compute the expected values of R and R2, assuming that the hosts are uniformly distributed on the sky, that the angular size of each host is much less than σ, and that each the observed location of each burst is displaced from its true value by a random angle selected from a gaussian distribution of width σ. (The latter two points are relevant only for bursts from repeaters.) In the flat-sky approximation (σ ≪ 1), we find hRi = 1 4Bσ2 + 1 8 f (∆R)2 ≡ hR2i − hRi2 = 1 16σ2 + 1 96B−1f , (9) (10) where f ≡ 2N2/B is the fraction of bursts which came from repeaters. If each host has an angular size φ, then the coefficient of f in eq. (9) is reduced; if the burst probability across a host has a gaussian profile, then the reduction factor is σ2/(σ2 + φ2). Not including such a factor in our subsequent analysis implies that each of our hypothetical hosts has an angular size φ which is much less than σ. Eqs. (9,10) can be understood heuristically. Roughly speaking, hRi is the expected number of bursts which lie within an angular distance σ of any one particular burst. There is a contribution to hRi due to bursts from different hosts; this contribution is of order Bσ2. There is a second contribution if the particular burst in question is a repeater; the probability that this is the case is of order f . This explains the structure of eq. (9). To understand the variance (∆R)2, we note that the Bσ2 term in hRi comes from a Poisson process, so its variance is also Bσ2. However, averaging over the particular burst in question reduces the variance by a factor of B. The term of order f in (∆R)2, which in practice is not important, can be similarly understood. The probability distribution for R should be approximately gaussian, P (RN2, B) = 1 √2π∆R exp[−(R − hRi)2/2(∆R)2] , (11) -- 6 -- where Rav and ∆R are given in terms of N2 = f B/2 and B by eqs. (9,10). For BATSE, in which each burst has its own value of σ, and in which sky coverage is not uniform, eqs. (9,10) should be approximately correct, but possibly with different numerical coefficients. For this case, we turn to the Monte Carlo results of Tegmark et al. (1996). Their Figure 1 0 P (r)dr vs. R for several different values of f . From this, we can read off shows R R hRi = 0.316 + 0.15 f and ∆R = 0.0068 for f = 0. This is consistent with our eqs. (9,10) with a value of σ ∼ 2◦. (We neglect the f dependence of ∆R, which is difficult to extract accurately, since it will not be important to our conclusions.) The experimental value of R for BATSE is Rexp = 0.308. Assuming that there are in fact no repeaters, then the probability that the BATSE data would yield a value of R which is less than Rexp is 0.11. Eq. (11) is also consistent with the results of Tegmark et al. (1996) that f < 0.018 at 95% CL and f < 0.049 at the 99% CL. We now combine eq. (7) and eq. (11) to get P (RexpB, A, H) = B/2 XN2=0 P (RexpN2, B)P (N2B, A, H) . (12) Again performing a Bayesian analysis for H with the scale-invariant prior distribution dH/H and an upper cutoff of Hmax = 109, we find H > 1.7 × 105 with a CL of 91%; this is smaller than B2 by a factor of 7.4. This factor is roughly the expected number of repeaters in a Bayesian analysis, hN2i = P∞ N2=0 P (RexpN2, B)N2 P∞ N2=0 P (RexpN2, B) , (13) where P (RexpN2, B) is given by eq. (11), and we have implicitly assumed a uniform prior distribution for N2; in the present case, eq. (13) yields hN2i = 12. Turning to future experiments, we first recall that BATSE happened to produce a low value of Rexp. A larger catalog for BATSE which instead yielded the most likely value when f = 0, Rexp = hRif =0 = 1 f > 0. Assuming (for example) a catalog with B = 3000 bursts, we find that H > 3.7 × 105 at the 90% CL. More significant improvements in the lower bound on H would require an instrument with a better angular resolution. 4 Bσ2, would result in P (Rexpf ) ∝ exp[−(0.15 f )2/2(∆R)2] for We now turn to the more general case of a population of hosts, each with an individual Ai (the burst production rate times observation time for that host). We will make the mild assumption that the distribution of Ai's has moments 1 H H Xi=1 An i ≡ cnAn (14) -- 7 -- which remain finite in the limit of large H. Note that c1 = 1 and c2 ≥ 1. From here on we will concentrate on the simplest case of no repetitions. The probability that we see B bursts with no repetitions is given by eq. (3). We can write the Kronecker symbol as δB1+...+BH ,B = I dz 2πiz z−BzB1 . . . zBH , (15) where the contour encloses the origin. Each sum in eq. (3) now yields a factor of exp(−Ai)(1 + zAi), and so we find P (B, no rep{Ai}, H) = exp(−AH)I exp(cid:20) = I dz 2πiz dz 2πiz z−B H (1 + zAi) Yi=1 H Xi=1 log(1 + zAi) − B log z − AH(cid:21) . (16) We now treat both H and B as large, and evaluate the integral by steepest descent. Let F (z) be the argument of the exponential in the second line of eq. (16); the point z0 of steepest descent is then given by F ′(z0) = 0, or 0 = H Xi=1 Ai 1 + z0Ai − B z0 = H[A − z0(c2A2) + z2 0(c3A3) + . . .] − Bz−1 0 . Taking B ≪ H, this can be solved by power series to yield 2 − c3)(B/H)3 + . . . . The probability of getting B bursts with no repetitions is now given by z0A = (B/H) + c2(B/H)2 + (2c2 P (B, no rep{Ai}, H) = [2πF ′′(z0)]−1/2z−1 0 exp F (z0) . (17) (18) (19) After dividing by P (BA, H) we find that the probability that no repetitions are seen, given that B bursts are observed, is P (no repB,{Ai}, H) = exp(−c2B2/2H) (20) in the limit H ≫ B ≫ 1. This is qualitatively the same as our previous result, eq. (6), except that now the relative value of the second moment of the distribution enters as well. The coefficient c2 must be greater than one, so this correction can only increase the lower bound on H. -- 8 -- 3. Implications for the hosts of GRBs and Discussion We now turn to the implications of the preceding analysis to the specific case of GRBs and the host population in which the GRBs may be embedded. We have seen that if we observe B GRBs, which originated from a host population of H hosts, and further if assume that no host generated more than one burst, then we can conclude that H must be bounded below by B2, at a confidence level of roughly 90%. If a probability-weighted average over the number of repeaters is taken instead, then the lower bound on H drops to a number which is of order B2/hN2i, where hN2i is the expected number of repeaters. This is given by eq. (13), which would typically yield hN2i ∼ Bσ (and hence Hmin ∼ B/σ), where σ is the angular resolution of the detector. Our constraint on H can be significant for models in which the host population for GRBs consists of exotic objects of any kind, such as galaxies with some particular morphological feature or other specific signature such as a high star formation rate. Another possibility is to consider clusters of galaxies as hosts (rather than individual galaxies), provided that the angular size of the clusters considered is much less than σ. If repeaters are ever detected statistically through a value of Rexp which is larger than hRi by several ∆R, this analysis can be readily adapted to find upper and lower limits on the number of hosts H. The most likely value will be H = B2/hN2i, where hN2i is the most likely value of the number of repeaters. Finally, we restate our main point: simply by knowing that there are ∼ 103 bursts with no sign of repeaters, we can immediately infer a model-independent lower bound on the number of hosts in which GRBs may be embedded which is larger by more than two orders of magnitude. We thank Omer Blaes for many helpful discussions, and the referee for several important comments which improved the paper. This work was supported in part by NSF Grant PHY -- 91 -- 16964. Blaes, O. 1994, ApJS, 92, 643 REFERENCES Blaes, O., Hurt, T., Antonucci, R., Hurley, K. & Smette, A. 1997, ApJ, 479, 868 Fenimore, E.E. et al. 1993, Nature, 366, 40 Hurley, K., Hartmann, D., Kouveliotou, C., Fishman, G., Laros, J., Cline, T., and Boer, M. -- 9 -- 1997, ApJ, in press. Kollat, T. & Piran T. 1996, ApJ, 467, L41 Larson, S., Mc Lean, I. & Becklin, E. 1996, ApJ, 460, L95 Loredo, T.J., and Wasserman, I. 1995, ApJS, 96, 261 Metzger, M., Djorgovski, S., Steidel, C., Kulkarni, S., Adelberger, K. & Frail, D. 1997, IAUC 6655. Narayan, R. & Piran, T. 1993, MNRAS, 265, L65 Petrosian V. 1993, ApJ, 402, L33 Piran, T. 1995, in Some unsolved problems in astrophysics, eds. Bahcall, J. & Ostriker, J. (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press). Piran, T. & Singh, A. 1997, preprint astro-ph/9607072, to appear in ApJ, July 1997 Quashnock, J. & Lamb, D. 1993, MNRAS, 265, L59 Schaefer, B., Cline, T., Hurley, K. & Laros, G. 1997, preprint astro-ph/9704278. Tegmark, M., Hartmann, D., Briggs, M., Hakkila, J. & Meegan, C. 1996, ApJ, 466, 757 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0.
astro-ph/0112543	1	0112	2001-12-26T04:29:45	On the Maximal Quantity of Processed Information in the Physical Eschatological Context	[ "astro-ph" ]	An estimate of the maximal informational content available to advanced extraterrestrial or future (post)human civilizations is presented. It is shown that the fundamental thermodynamical considerations may lead to a quantitative estimate of the largest quantity of information to be processed by conceivable computing devices. This issue is interesting from the point of view of physical eschatology, as well as general futurological topics, like the degree of confidence in long-term physical predictions or viability of the large-scale simulations of complex systems.	astro-ph	astro-ph	ON THE MAXIMAL QUANTITY OF PROCESSED INFORMATION IN THE PHYSICAL ESCHATOLOGICAL CONTEXT MILAN M. ´CIRKOVI ´C Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia MARINA RADUJKOV Petnica Science Center, P. O. Box 118 14000 Valjevo, Yugoslavia Abstract An estimate of the maximal informational content available to advanced ex- traterrestrial or future (post)human civilizations is presented. It is shown that the fundamental thermodynamical considerations may lead to a quantitative estimate of the largest quantity of information to be processed by conceivable computing devices. This issue is interesting from the point of view of physical eschatology, as well as general futurological topics, like the degree of confidence in long-term physical predictions or viability of the large-scale simulations of complex systems. 1 Introduction The problem of intelligent information processing in the ever-expanding universe has recently been investigated by several authors (Krauss and Starkman 1999; ´Cirkovi´c and Bostrom 2000). These considerations have entered a new phase, building upon advances in observational cosmology and the strong foundations of the pioneering studies in cosmological prediction by Rees (1969), Dyson (1979), Frautschi (1982), Tipler (1986) and Barrow and Tipler (1986). In the same time, interest in the fundamental physical limits of computation has grown, largely motivated by tremendous advances in computer science (e.g. Lloyd 2000). Continuation of such trend of technological progress will lead humanity, sooner or later, into a stage of highly advanced galactic civilization, in recent years conventionally dubbed the posthuman era. Apart from the epochal importance of any such possible development for biological and social sciences, it has a strong bearing on the nascent astrophysical discipline of physical eschatology, for the reasons suggested boldly by Dyson (1979), when he wrote: It is impossible to calculate in detail the long-range future of the universe without including the effects of life and intelligence. It is impossible to calculate the capabilities of life and intelligence without touching, at least peripherally, philosophical questions. Certainly, the most important property of intelligence is its capacity for information processing. As it has been recognized for a long time, this form of information process- ing is still entirely within limits of physical, specifically thermodynamical, laws. This 1 conclusion does not necessarily entail reductionism, since consciousness may still con- tain uncomputable and therefore irreducible elements in addition to the conventionally established ones (e.g. Penrose 1989). And thermodynamics in general is, in the limit of very long timescales, determined by properties of the universe as a whole, i.e. by astrophysics and cosmology. Our goal in this note is to consider very simple cases of maximal informational resources available to advanced civilizations, either extraterres- trial or posthuman. We do not enter into any possible distinction between the two, since the ages of humanity, Earth and our Galaxy, as well as the pace of chemical evolution, suggest that there may be intelligent communities much older than ours even in our cosmological neighbourhood (Livio 1999). 2 An estimate of the maximal quantity of processed information Let us consider various energy fields as potential sources of energy for information pro- cessing, using the assumption ("Cosmic Sum rule") that Ω = ΩΛ + Ωb + ΩCDM = 1, where the first term corresponds to the vacuum energy, second to the baryonic matter, and the third to the (non-baryonic) cold dark matter (for the general cosmological con- siderations, see Peebles 1993). The best present estimates approach values ΩΛ ≈ 0.7, ΩCDM ≈ 0.25 and Ωb ≈ 0.05 (e.g. ´Cirkovi´c and Bostrom 2000, and references therein). One cannot do anything useful with the vacuum energy.1 As far as CDM is concerned, it could conceivably be used as an energy source, since the annihilation of these cosmions and anticosmions (present in approximately equal numbers according to the standard theory) would produce potentially usable energy (for some consequences of annihilation, see Kaplinghat, Knox and Turner 2000). However, depending on the mass spectrum of cosmions, their galactic density is rather small, and since their interactions are by definition very weak, their gathering and separation for annihilation will pose huge en- gineering problems. If we consider the model of "posthumanity soon", than only usable matter field is the baryonic matter, in the local environment concentrated in the form of planetary systems. We may use the Brillouen's (1962) equality for the upper limit of processable quantity of information (in bits): Imax = ∆E kBT ln 2 = 1.05 × 1016 ∆E T . (1) Here, kB is the Boltzmann constant. Both ∆E and T are functions of time, as well as of cosmological parameters Ω, Λ and H0. There are several important consequences of the Brillouen's inequality for cosmology. The amount of information available for processing in any causally connected region of finite proper size with trivial topology is necessarily finite. As for the working temperature of posthuman computers, we may wish to consider two somewhat extreme models: (I) the first with T = TCMB = 2.730 ± 0.014 K (Staggs 1On the contrary, it plausibly harms the energy budget by preventing, through the so-called cos- mological "no-hair" theorem, the development and subsequent exploitation of the cosmological shear during the Hubble expansion (Gibbons and Hawking 1977). 2 et al. 1996) -- indicating quick reaching of posthuman stage; additional cooling would re- quire diverting the precious energy resources from computing itself -- and (II) the second with T = Tvac = ¯hc kBs Λ 12π2 = 3.2985 × 10−30h(cid:18) ΩΛ 0.7(cid:19) 1 2 K (2) indicating posthumanity in the asymptotic limit of physical eschatology. In this equa- tion, Λ is the vacuum energy-density corresponding to the dimensionless cosmological density fraction ΩΛ, and h is the dimensionless Hubble constant (H0 ≡ 100 h km s−1 Mpc−1). Now we can write for the expendable energy: ∆E = ZV q(Ωbρcrit)c2 dV, (3) where V is the proper volume available to posthuman civilization and q is the energy extraction efficiency (between 0 and 1, and optimistically over 0.5). The usage of Ωb is particularly useful when we consider possibility of posthuman civilizations of truly intergalactic size. Currently there is some confusion about the exact value of Ωb, since the primordial nucleosynthesis inferences apparently conflicts with conclusions drawn from the microwave background anisotropy observations (e.g. Kaplinghat and Turner 2001). It is to be expected that this problem will be solved soon, but in the meantime we note that the exact value is inessential for our purposes. If we restrict ourselves to the model (I), that is, "posthumanity soon", we may neglect spatial variation of q and Ωb (which would be present in other cases, say q is certainly different in intergalactic space from the one within galaxies), and using the definitional relation for Ωb we get ∆E ≈ qc2ZV ρb dV. Now, plugging this into (1), we obtain Imax = qc2 kB ln 2RV ρb dV T = 3.5 × 1036qZV ρb dV, (4) (5) in bits. If we wish to consider truly short-term posthuman civilization, we may state that the value of the integral is equal to ρb dV = 2 × 1033 ZV ¯M M⊙ n grams, (6) where n = 1, 2... is the number of planetary systems controlled by our prototype posthu- man civilization, and ¯M is the average mass of a planetary system in the Galaxy. The fraction in (6) is likely to be less or about 1.5, when mass of the hidden matter (like comets in the Oort cloud whose total mass is still uncertain; see Weissman 1983) in our planetary system is taken into account, as well as the possibility of harvesting some interstellar matter between systems. Taking all this into account, we reach the estimate of bits. (7) ¯M M⊙ Imax = 7 × 1069qn 3 An analogous estimate can be obtained for the case (II) of posthumans in the far future. This case will certainly be prone to much larger uncertainties of not only quantitative, but also qualitative nature. Therefore, we shall here give just a sketch and postpone the detailed analysis to a forthcoming study. To this end, we may generalize the expression (5) taking into account the changes in both resources and methods available to advanced civilizations during long cosmological scales Imax(t) = q(t) c2 kB ln 2 t Zt0 dt T (t) ZV (t) ρb dV. (8) Here, V (t) denotes the physical (proper) volume of space available to the advanced civilization under consideration, and T (t) is the evolution of the cosmic temperature (T (t0) = TCMB = 2.730 ± 0.014 K). In this case, it is important to notice that the evolu- tion of the equilibrium temperature of the universe in the context of physical eschatology is a problem not exactly solved to this day (approximate results for Einstein-de Sitter model are presented in Adams and Laughlin 1997), mainly because at very late epochs controversial sources (like the proton decay and Hawking radiation of an uncertain num- ber of decaying black holes) come into play. Fortunately, we may be in position to know the asymptotic limit of the process of cooling of the universe, since it is determined by the temperature associated with the cosmological event horizon (Gibbons and Hawking 1977) in eq. (2). Since it can be shown that -- if current estimates of the cosmological constant are correct -- we have already entered the exponentially expanding (quasi)de Sitter phase ( ´Cirkovi´c and Bostrom 2000), we may use the simplest approximation of temperature decreasing as T (t) = T (t0) exp[−H(t − t0)], leading to the formal equalisa- tion with (2) in t = t0 +(1/H0) ln[T (t0)/Tvac] ≈ t0 +69.58/H0, i.e. in about 1140 Gyr (for h = 0.6). As shown by Adams and Laughlin (1997; although only for the Einstein-de Sitter case), this is too pessimistic, since other photon sources will replace CMB as the determinants of the temperature of the universal heat bath. It will take probably many orders of magnitude larger time for the universe to reach the de Sitter temperature, but what is important is that there may be no further cooling. Thus, Dyson's (1979) idea about using a special form of hybernation for the expression in eq. (1) to diverge is unfeasible. That said, we leave considerations of the detailed solutions of eq. (8) to a subsequent work, which will benefit from our increased understanding of the future thermal history of the universe. 3 Discussion We have estimated (within an order of magnitude) the information processing power of advanced extraterrestrial or future posthuman communities. Our estimate is conser- vative in the sense that we have ignored the complicated and not yet fully understood issue of dissipationless computation (see, for instance, Porod et al. 1984) and assumed classical limit of kT log 2 dissipation per logical step. In addition, we have neglected the important issues of information transmission, noise and error correction (for a prelim- inary treatment of these, see the pioneering study of Sandberg 2000). All these issues should be covered in future, more realistic treatments. It is worth noticing that numerical estimates reached above are quite conservative in comparison to the proposed fundamental information bounds, such as the holographic 4 bound (e.g. Sussking 1995) I h max = A P l ln 2 4L2 , (9) (where LP l ≡ qG¯h/c3 ≈ 2 × 10−33 cm is the Planck length) or the Bekenstein (1973, 1981) bound I B max = 2πRE c¯h ln 2 , (10) max max where R is the radius and E the total mass-energy of the information cache. For instance, the equivalent of a holographic bound for the case of entire planetary systems from eq. ≈ 9.8 × 1076 (n ¯M/M⊙)2 bits, and the application of the Bekenstein bound (7) gives I h ≈ 5.13 × 1071 q(n ¯M /M⊙)(R/1 cm) bits (where one should to the same case yields I B keep in mind that in order for this bound to be meaningful, the size of the memory R has to be larger from its gravitational radius, which is about 3 × 105 cm per Solar mass). Parenthetically, we note that most of the treatments of cosmological limitations on computation to be found in the literature (e.g. Tipler 1986; Sandberg 2000) and on the Internet use the Bekenstein bound, which is certainly more realistic and practical, but does not look entirely sound from the conceptual point of view. The reason for such a disadvantage of the Bekenstein bound compared to the holographic bound is that the Newtonian gravitational constant G figures explicitly in the latter and not in the former. Since we believe that quantum gravitational degrees of freedom may contain a huge amount of information (and could be potentially exploited by advanced communities), a liberal approach would favor the usage of the holographic bound. There are several reasons for pursuing this problem further. One is related to the confidence we may have in predictions of nonlinear dynamical systems by future com- puting devices. It is a well-known fact that (apparent) complexity of nonlinear systems increase at an exponential rate with time. No matter how advanced computing devices are employed in order to predict the behaviour of such systems, the prediction will break down at a particular timescale. One of the main factors determining this timescale is certainly the maximal amount of information which can be processed whatsoever during the computations necessary for prediction. But probably the most interesting issue to be solved by calculations such as these is the question of information cost of running large-scale detailed simulations of human environment. There are reasons to believe that advanced posthuman civilizations will run such simulations, which are sometimes aptly called "ancestor simulations" (Prof. Nick Bostrom, manuscript in preparation). It is clear, however, that the depth (or complexity) of such a simulation would be very sensitive to the computing power and information resources of a posthuman "director". In order to assess viability of this scenario, one should attempt to reasonably predict those quantities. On the other hand, it remains for computer and cognitive scientists, as well as sociologists, to answer the deep question of minimal informational cost of any realistic simulation of human consciousness and society. It is a pleasure to express gratitude to Prof. Nick Bostrom, whose deep insights into all sorts of futurological and philosophical questions has largely motivated the study of this topic. Srdjan Samurovi´c is acknowledged for invaluable technical help. References 5 Adams, F. C. and Laughlin, G.: 1997, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 337. Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. J.: 1986, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (New York: Oxford University Press). Bekenstein, J.: 1973, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333. Bekenstein, J.: 1981, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 623. Brillouin, L.: 1962, Science and Information Theory (New York: Academic Press). ´Cirkovi´c, M. M. and Bostrom, N.: 2000, Astrophys. Space Sci. 274, 675. Dyson, F.: 1979, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 447. Frautschi, S.: 1982, Science 217, 593. Gibbons, G. W. and Hawking, S. W.: 1977, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738. Kaplinghat, M., Knox, L., and Turner, M. S.: 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3335. Kaplinghat, M. and Turner, M. S.: 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 385. Krauss, L. M. and Starkman, G.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 531, 22. Livio, M.: 1999, Astrophys. J. 511, 429. Lloyd, S.: 2000, Nature 406, 1047. Peebles, P. J. E.: 1993, Principles of Physical Cosmology (Princeton: Princeton Uni- versity Press). Penrose, R.: 1989, The Emperor's New Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Porod, W., Grondin, R. O., Ferry, D. K. and Porod, G.: 1984, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 232. Rees, M. J.: 1969, Observatory 89, 193. Sandberg, A.: 2000, Journal of Transhumanism 5 (available at http://transhumanist.com/volume5/Brains2.pdf). Staggs, S. T., Jarosik, N. C., Meyer, S. S., and Wilkinson, D. T.: 1996, Astrophys. J. 473, L1. Susskind, L.: 1995, J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377. Tipler, F. J.: 1986, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25, 617. Weissman, P. R.: 1983, Astron. Astrophys. 118, 90. 6
0808.3771	2	0808	2009-01-07T09:48:47	Chandra X-ray spectroscopy of the focused wind in the Cygnus X-1 system. I. The non-dip spectrum in the low/hard state	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present analyses of a 50 ks observation of the supergiant X-ray binary system Cygnus X-1/HDE 226868 taken with the Chandra High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS). Cyg X-1 was in its spectrally hard state and the observation was performed during superior conjunction of the black hole, allowing for the spectroscopic analysis of the accreted stellar wind along the line of sight. A significant part of the observation covers X-ray dips as commonly observed for Cyg X-1 at this orbital phase, however, here we only analyze the high count rate non-dip spectrum. The full 0.5-10 keV continuum can be described by a single model consisting of a disk, a narrow and a relativistically broadened Fe Kalpha line, and a power law component, which is consistent with simultaneous RXTE broad band data. We detect absorption edges from overabundant neutral O, Ne and Fe, and absorption line series from highly ionized ions and infer column densities and Doppler shifts. With emission lines of He-like Mg XI, we detect two plasma components with velocities and densities consistent with the base of the spherical wind and a focused wind. A simple simulation of the photoionization zone suggests that large parts of the spherical wind outside of the focused stream are completely ionized, which is consistent with the low velocities (<200 km/s) observed in the absorption lines, as the position of absorbers in a spherical wind at low projected velocity is well constrained. Our observations provide input for models that couple the wind activity of HDE 226868 to the properties of the accretion flow onto the black hole.	astro-ph	astro-ph	THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 690:330 -- 346, 2009 January 1 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 2009 January 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/330 CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYGNUS X-1 SYSTEM I. THE NONDIP SPECTRUM IN THE LOW/HARD STATE MANFRED HANKE1,2, JÖRN WILMS1,2, MICHAEL A. NOWAK3, KATJA POTTSCHMIDT4,5,6, NORBERT S. SCHULZ3, AND JULIA C. LEE7 Received 2008 May 28; accepted 2008 August 27; published 2008 December 1 ABSTRACT We present analyses of a 50 ks observation of the supergiant X-ray binary system Cygnus X-1/HDE 226868 taken with the Chandra High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS). Cyg X-1 was in its spec- trally hard state and the observation was performed during superior conjunction of the black hole, allowing for the spectroscopic analysis of the accreted stellar wind along the line of sight. A significant part of the observation covers X-ray dips as commonly observed for Cyg X-1 at this orbital phase, however, here we analyze only the high count rate nondip spectrum. The full 0.5 -- 10 keV continuum can be described by a single model consisting of a disk, a narrow and a relativistically broadened Fe Kα line, and a power-law component, which is consistent with simultaneous RXTE broad band data. We detect absorption edges from overabundant neutral O, Ne, and Fe, and absorption line series from highly ionized ions and infer column densities and Doppler shifts. With emission lines of He-like Mg XI, we detect two plasma components with velocities and densities consistent with the base of the spherical wind and a focused wind. A simple simulation of the photoionization zone suggests that large parts of the spherical wind outside of the focused stream are completely ionized, which is consistent with the low velocities (<200 km s- 1) observed in the absorption lines, as the position of absorbers in a spherical wind at low projected velocity is well constrained. Our observations provide input for models that couple the wind activity of HDE 226868 to the properties of the accretion flow onto the black hole. Key words: accretion, accretion disks -- stars: individual (HDE 226868, Cyg X-1) -- stars: winds, outflows -- techniques: spectroscopic -- X-rays: binaries 1. INTRODUCTION Cygnus X-1 was discovered in 1964 (Bowyer et al. 1965) and soon identified as a high-mass X-ray binary system (HMXB) with an orbital period of 5.6 d (Murdin & Webster 1971; Webster & Murdin 1972; Bolton 1972). It consists of the su- pergiant O9.7 star HDE 226868 (Walborn 1973; Humphreys 1978) and a compact object, which is dynamically constrained to be a black hole (Gies & Bolton 1982). The detailed spectro- scopic analysis of HDE 226868 by Herrero et al. (1995) gives a stellar mass M⋆ ≈ 18 M⊙, leading to a mass of MBH ∼10 M⊙ for the black hole, if an inclination i ≈ 35◦ is assumed. Note that Ziółkowski (2005) derives a mass of M⋆ = (40 ± 5) M⊙ from the evolutionary state of HDE 226868, corresponding to MBH = (20 ± 5) M⊙, while Shaposhnikov & Titarchuk (2007) claim MBH = (8.7 ± 0.8) M⊙ from X-ray spectral-timing rela- tions. Cyg X-1 is usually found in one of the two states that are dis- tinguished by the soft X-ray luminosity and spectral shape, the timing properties, and the radio flux (see, e.g., Pottschmidt et al. 2003; Gleissner et al. 2004a,b; Wilms et al. 2006): the low/hard state is characterized by a lower luminosity below 10 keV, a hard Comptonization power-law spectrum (photon index Γ ∼ 1.7) with a cutoff at high energies (folding energy Efold ∼ Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Dr. Karl Remeis-Sternwarte, Astronomisches Institut der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Sternwartstr. 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany 2 Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, University of Erlangen- Nuremberg, Erwin-Rommel-Strasse 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany 3 MIT-CXC, NE80-6077, 77 Mass. Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 4 CRESST, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA 5 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Astrophysics Science Division, Code 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 6 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, 9500 Gilman Drive, CA 92093-0424, USA 7 Harvard University, Department of Astronomy (part of the Harvard- Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics), 60 Garden Street, MS-6, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 150 keV) and strong variability of ∼30% root mean square In (rms). Radio emission is detected at the ∼15 mJy level. the high/soft state, the soft X-ray spectrum is dominated by a bright and much less variable (only few % rms) thermal disk component, and the source is invisible in the radio. Within the classification of Remillard & McClintock (2006), the high/soft state of Cyg X-1 corresponds to the steep power-law state rather than to the thermal state, as a power-law spectrum with pho- ton index Γ ∼ 2.5 may extend up to ∼10 MeV (Zhang et al. 1997; McConnell et al. 2002; Cadolle Bel et al. 2006). Most of the time, Cyg X-1 is found in the hard state, but transitions to the soft state and back after a few weeks or months are common every few years. Transitional or intermediate states (Belloni et al. 1996) are often accompanied by radio and/or X- ray flares. Similar to a transition to the soft state, the spec- trum softens during these flares and the variability is reduced. This behavior is called a "failed state transition" if the true soft state is not reached (Pottschmidt et al. 2000, 2003). Transi- tional states have occurred more frequently since mid-1999 than before (Wilms et al. 2006), which might indicate changes in the mass-accretion rate due to a slight expansion of HDE 226868 (Karitskaya et al. 2006). HMXBs are believed to be powered by accretion from the stellar wind. The accretion rate and therefore X-ray luminos- ity and spectral state are thus very sensitive to the wind's de- tailed properties such as velocity, density, and ionization. For HDE 226868, Gies et al. (2003) found an anticorrelation be- tween the Hα equivalent width (an indicator for the wind mass loss rate M⋆) and the X-ray flux. Considering the photoioniza- tion of the wind would allow for a self-consistent explanation (see, e.g., Blondin 1994): a lower mass loss gives a lower wind density and therefore higher degree of ionization due to the irradiation of hard X-rays, which reduces the driving force of HDE 226868's UV photons on the wind and results in a lower wind velocity v, leading finally to a higher accretion rate (∝ M⋆/v4, Bondi & Hoyle 1944). However, Gies et al. (2008) find 2 HANKE ET AL. suggestions that the photoionization and velocity of the wind might be similar during both hard and soft states. UV obser- vations allow the photoionization in the HDE 226868 / Cyg X-1 system to be probed: Vrtilek et al. (2008) reported P Cygni pro- files of N V, C IV, and Si IV with weaker absorption compo- nents at orbital phase φorb ≈ 0.5, i.e., when the black hole is in the foreground of the supergiant. This reduced absorp- tion, which was already found by Treves et al. (1980), is due to the Hatchett & McCray (1977) effect, showing that those ions become superionized by the X-ray source. Gies et al. (2008) model the orbital variations of the UV lines assuming that the wind of HDE 226868 is restricted to the shadow wind from the shielded side of the stellar surface (Blondin 1994), i.e., the Strömgren (1939) zone of Cyg X-1 extends to the donor star. However, this assumption applies only to the spherical part of the wind, which might therefore hardly contribute to the mass accretion of Cyg X-1. As HDE 226868 is close to filling its Roche lobe (Conti 1978; Gies & Bolton 1986a,b), the wind is not spherically symmetri- cal as for isolated stars, but strongly enhanced toward the black hole ("focused wind"; Friend & Castor 1982). The strongest wind absorption lines in the optical are therefore observed at the conjunction phases (Gies et al. 2003). Similarly, X-ray absorp- tion dips occur preferentially around φorb = 0, i.e., during su- perior conjunction of the black hole (Bałuci´nska-Church et al. 2000). These dips are probably caused by dense, neutral clumps, formed in the focused wind where the photoioniza- tion is reduced, although recent analyses have also suggested that part of the dipping activity may result from the interac- tion of the focused wind with the edge of the accretion disk (Poutanen et al. 2008). The photoionization and dynamics of both the spherical and focused winds can also be investigated with the high-resolution grating spectrometers of the modern X-ray observatories Chan- dra or XMM-Newton. As none of the previously reported ob- servations of Cyg X-1 was performed at orbital phase φorb = 0 and in the hard state, when the wind is probably denser and less ionized than in the soft state, the Chandra observation presented here allows for the most detailed investigation of the focused wind to date. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: in Sec- tion 2, we describe our observations of Cyg X-1 with Chandra and the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), and how we model CCD pile-up for the Chandra-HETGS data. We present our investigations in Section 3: after investigating the light curves, we model the nondip continuum and analyze neutral absorption edges and absorption lines from the highly ionized stellar wind -- and the few emission lines from He-like ions, which indicate two plasma components. In Section 4, we dis- cuss models for the stellar wind and the photoionization zone. We summarize our results after comparing them with those of the previous Chandra observations of Cyg X-1. 2. OBSERVATION AND DATA REDUCTION 2.1. ChandraACIS-S/HETGS Observation Cyg X-1 was observed on 2003 April 19 and 20 by the Chan- dra X-Ray Observatory, see Table 1. An overview on all its in- struments is given by the Proposers' Observatory Guide (CXC 2006). In the first four months of 2003, the RXTE All-Sky Monitor (ASM; see Doty 1994; Levine et al. 1996) showed the source's 1.5 -- 12 keV count rate to be generally below 50 ASM- cps (Figure 1). At the time of our Chandra observation, it was less than 25 cps (0.33 Crab), typically indicative of the source being in its low/hard state (Wilms et al. 2006). Table 1 Observations of Cyg X-1 Satellite / Instrument Chandra MEG±1b HEG±1c RXTE PCAd HEXTE a+be Start (MJD) 52748.70 (52748.70) (52748.70) 52748.08 52748.74 52748.74 Stop (MJD) 52749.28 (52749.28) (52749.28) 52749.18 52748.78 52748.78 Exposurea Count Ratea (ks) (47.2) 16.1 16.1 · · · 3.0 1.1 (cps) ( · · · ) 2 × 27 2 × 17 · · · 1456 2×186 Notes. a For the Chandra data, the nondip GTIs (see Figure 4) have been used. For RXTE, the 11th orbit was considered. b The Chandra-MEG spectra cover ≈ 0.8 -- 6 keV (1 -- 99 % quantiles). c The Chandra-HEG spectra cover ≈ 1 -- 7.5 keV (1 -- 99 % quantiles). d The RXTE-PCA data from 4 to 20 keV has been used. e The RXTE-HEXTE data from 20 to 250 keV has been used. 200 100 50 ] s p c [ e t a r t n u o c M S A V e k 2 1 5 1 . 20 10 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Date in 2003 the 1.5 -- 12 keV count rate did not exceed 25 cps. Figure 1. Brightness of Cyg X-1 as seen by the ASM on board RXTE. During the Chandra observation (marked by a line), the source was still in its low/hard state: In spite of the high intrinsic variability, the high/soft state during June, July, and August can clearly be distinguished, a result which is also found by spectral analysis (Wilms et al. 2006). The High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS), containing high and medium energy gratings (HEG/MEG; see Canizares et al. 2005) was used to disperse X- ray spectra with the highest resolution (CXC 2006, Table 8.1): ∆λHEG = 5.5 mÅ and ∆λMEG = 11 mÅ (1) As only half of the spectroscopy array of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS-S; see Garmire et al. 2003), namely a 512 pixel broad subarray, was operated in the timed event (TE) mode, the six CCDs could be read out after expo- sure times of tframe = 1.7 s and the position of each event is well determined. Photons from the different gratings can thus easily be distinguished due to the different dispersion directions of the HEG and the MEG. Even in its low state, however, Cyg X-1 is so bright that several photons may pile up in a CCD pixel during one readout frame. Both events cannot be discriminated and are interpreted as a single photon with larger energy. As the undis- persed image would have been completely piled up, only 10% of those events in a 40× 38 pixel window have been transmit- ted in order to save telemetry capacity. The first-order spectra are, however, only moderately affected, which can be modeled - CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYG X-1 SYSTEM. I. 3 very well (Section 2.2). The alternative to this approach would have been to use the continuous clocking (CC) mode, where the ACIS chips are read out continuously in 2.85 ms, but only the position perpendicular to the readout direction can be de- termined for every photon event. The CC mode was, however, avoided due to difficulties in the reconstruction of HEG and MEG spectra and other calibration issues. The undispersed position of the source is required for the wavelength calibration of the spectra. We redetermined it to R.A. = 19h 58m 21.s67, δ = +35◦ 12′ 5.′′83 from the intersection of the HEG and MEG arm and the readout streak (Ishibashi 2006). Afterward, the event lists were reduced using the stan- dard software from the ChandraX-ray Center (CXC), CIAO 3.3 with CALDB 3.2.3.8 Exceptionally narrow extraction regions had to be chosen as the background spectrum would other- wise have been dominated by the dispersed extended X-ray- scattering halo around the source (Xiang et al. 2005). The fur- ther analysis was performed with the Interactive Spectral Inter- pretation System (ISIS) 1.4.9 (Houck 2002).9 We use the four first-order MEG and HEG spectra (with two dispersion directions each, called +1 and - 1 in the following) which provide the best signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). The "second- order spectra" are dominantly formed by piled first-order events which reach the other order sorting window of data extraction (defined in dispersion-energy space) when the energy of two first-order photons accumulates. This effect is most evident for the MEG, whose even dispersion orders are suppressed by con- struction of the grating bars (CXC 2006). 2.2. Model for Pile-Up in Grating Observations For the first-order spectra, pile-up causes a pure reduction of count rate: a multiple event, i.e., the detection of more than one photon in a CCD pixel during one readout time, which cannot be separated, is either rejected by grade selection dur- ing the data processing or migrates to a higher-order spectrum. The Poisson probability for single events in a 3× 3 pixel event- detection cell i (see Davis 2002, 2003; CXC 2005) is (2) where the expected number of events, Λ(i) = γ0 ·Ctot(i), is given by the total spectral count rate, Ctot(i), at this position (in units of counts per Å and s), and where the constant γ0 is P1(i) = Λ(i) · exp(cid:0) - Λ(i)(cid:1) , γ0 = 3 ∆λ· tframe , (3) where ∆λ is the resolution of the spectrometer of Equation (1), and tframe is the frame time. We therefore describe the pile-up in the first-order spectra with the nonlinear convolution model simple_gpile2 in ISIS,10 which exponentially reduces the predicted count rate C(λ) according to Equation (2): C′(λ) = C(λ) · exp(cid:0) - γ ·Ctot(λ)(cid:1) (4) Here, the scale γ ≈ γ0 is left as fit parameter, and Ctot(λ) also takes the photons into account which are dispersed in a higher order m ≤ 3. The count rates are estimated from the correspond- ing effective areas Am and the assumed photon flux S: Ctot(λ) = X 3 m=1 Am(λ/m) · S(λ/m) (5) simple_gpile2 is based on the simple_gpile model (CXC 2005; Nowak et al. 2008), which parameterizes the 8 See http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao3.3/. 9 See http://space.mit.edu/cxc/isis/. 10 The ISIS/S-LANG code for simple_gpile2 is available online at http://pulsar.sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de/hanke/X-ray/code/simple_gpile2.sl. HEG−1 MEG+1 model pile−up corrected data 5 . 0 2 0 . 1 0 . 5 0 0 . 2 0 . 0 ] V e k / 2 m c / s / . h p [ x u l F piled data × 0.4 1 2 Energy [keV] 5 10 Figure 2. Pile-up in the HEG (black curves) and MEG (gray curves) data: the lower spectra, which are shifted by a factor of 0.4, show the uncorrected data. The dashed line shows the model (free of pile-up). The MEG spec- trum suffers from significant pile-up losses around 2 keV, where the highest count rate is obtained. The upper spectra show the pile-up corrected spectra. Note that we show ISIS' (model independent) flux spectra only for illustration; simple_gpile(2) operates on the count rates predicted by a model. strength of pile-up by the (maximum) pile-up fraction p = 1 - exp(cid:0)- γ · max{Ctot}(cid:1), while using the parameter γ of simple_gpile2 avoids to have a nonlocal model which de- pends on the flux at the position of the highest pile-up. The effect of pile-up is stronger in the MEG spectra than in the HEG spectra due to the lower dispersion and higher effective area of the MEG. The apparent flux reduction is most significant near 2 keV where the spectrometer has the largest efficiency and the highest count rates are obtained (see Figure 2). It can, how- ever, excellently be modeled with simple_gpile2. When fitting a spectrum, there is always a strong correlation between the pile-up scale γ and the corresponding flux normalization factor, e.g., the relative cross-calibration factor c introduced in Section 3.2. The best-fit values for the pile-up scales γ found in our data analysis (see Table 2) are only slightly larger than expected from Equation (3) (namely γ0,MEG ±1 = 5.6×10- 2 s Å and γ0,HEG ±1 = 2.8×10- 2 s Å), and the calibration factors c are consistent with 1, except for the HEG- 1 spectrum, for which both the largest γ - γ0 and c were found. Given the presence of the γ -- c correlation, we consider the latter to be a numerical artifact. According to the simple_gpile2 model, the MEG+1 spectra suffer from >30 % pile-up for 6 Å ≤ λ ≤ 8.3 Å, peaking at pMEG+1 = 45 % in the Si XIII f emission line at 6.74 Å. Except for some emission lines, among them the Fe Kα line, the con- tinuum pile-up fraction of the HEG spectra is below 17 %. For the HEG+1 spectrum, the reduction is less than 10 % outside the ranges 2.09 Å ≤ λ ≤ 4.08 Å and 6.05 Å ≤ λ ≤ 6.93 Å. 2.3. RXTEObservation While Chandra's HETGS provides a high spectral resolution, the energy range covered is rather limited. Within the frame- work of our RXTE monitoring campaign, the broadband spec- trum of Cyg X-1 was measured regularly, i.e., at least biweekly, since 1998 (see Wilms et al. 2006, and references therein). The observation on 2004 April 19 was extended to provide hard X- ray data simultaneously with the Chandra observation. More than one day was covered by 17 RXTE orbits of ∼47 min good (cid:9) 4 HANKE ET AL. E T X E H − E T X R 5 2 2 0 5 1 5 7 A C P − E T X R 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 6 a r d n a h C 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 # orbit PCA HEXTE Chandra 19.2 19.4 19.6 19.8 20 20.2 day of 2003 April Figure 3. Coverage of the simultaneous RXTE and Chandra observations. The plot shows the background-subtracted light curves with a time resolution of 64 s on a separate y axis each. Top: RXTE-HEXTE (20 -- 250 keV). The count rates have been corrected for the detector dead time. Center: RXTE-PCA (4 -- 20 keV), normalized by the number of active PCUs. Bottom: Chandra-HETGS (0.5 -- 12 keV, only first-order events; see Figure 4 for more details). The numbers label the RXTE orbits, vertical lines mark the first part of the nondip spectrum (see Section 3.1 and Figure 4), which completely covers RXTE orbit 11. orbital phase of the binary system 0.94 0.96 0.98 0.00 0.02 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 ] s p c [ e t a r t n u o c e t a r y g r e n e h g i h : w o l o i t a r ] V e k / 2 m c / s / h p [ x u l F 1 . 0 1 0 0 . 3 − 0 1 4 − 0 1 2 0 2 − PCA HEXTE a+b 0 10 20 30 40 50 observation time [ks] 10 Energy [keV] 100 Figure 4. Top: full 0.5 -- 12 keV band Chandra light curve. Bottom: ratio of 0.7 -- 1 keV band and 2.1 -- 7.2 keV band count rates. Absorption dips -- at first compact, then with complex substructure -- show up with a reduced flux and spectral hardening. Count rates >82.7 cps define the nondip data (dark). time, interrupted by ∼49 min intervals when Cyg X-1 was not observable due to Earth occultations or passages through the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), see Figure 3. Data in the 4 -- 20 keV range from the Proportional Counter Array (PCA; Jahoda et al. 1996) and in the 20 -- 250 keV range from the High Energy X-Ray Timing Experiment (HEXTE; Gruber et al. 1996) were used. The data were extracted using HEASOFT 6.3.1,11 following standard data screening proce- dures as recommended by the RXTE Guest Observer Facility. Data were only used if taken more than 30 minutes away from the SAA. For the PCA, only data taken in the top layer of the proportional counter were included in the final spectrum, and no additional systematic error was added to the spectrum. Dur- ing the observation, different sets of Proportional Counter Units (PCUs) were operative. During the 11th orbit, extensively used in this work, PCUs 1 and 4 were off. 3. ANALYSIS 3.1. Light Curve The Chandra observation covers a phase range between ∼0.93 and ∼0.03 in the 5.599829 d binary orbit (Gies et al. 2003, whose epoch is HJD 2451730.449± 0.008). The top panel of Figure 4 shows the light curve of first-order events (MEG±1, HEG±1) in the full band accessible with Chandra- HETGS. During several dip events, the flux is considerably 11 See http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/lheasoft/. Figure 5. RXTE 4 -- 250 keV broadband continuum spectrum, as measured with PCA below 20 keV and above 20 keV with HEXTE, which can be described by a broken power-law with high-energy cutoff and a weak iron line, see Table 2. Due to the joint fit with Chandra, the Fe line consists of narrow and a broad com- ponent, see Figure 6. The HEXTE spectra shown are renormalized to match the PCA flux, as the absolute calibrations of these two instruments differ by ∼15%. reduced. The absorption dips distinguish themselves also by spectral hardening (the bottom panel of Figure 4). We extract a 16.1 ks nondip spectrum, which is the subject of this paper, from all times when the total count rate exceeds 82.7 cps; these are indicated by dark points in Figure 4. The analysis of dip spectra will be described in a subsequent paper. The RXTE light curve shows considerable variability as well. Although the dips are more obviously detected with Chandra in the soft X-ray band, similar structures are also seen with RXTE-PCA or even -HEXTE, especially in the last RXTE or- bits of these observations (Figure 3). We chose to infer the nondip broadband spectrum from the RXTE data taken during the 11th orbit, which was performed entirely during the first part of the nondip phase. Other parts are interrupted by dips, occultations, or have nonuniform PCU configuration. 3.2. Continuum Spectrum The broadband spectrum of Cyg X-1 in the hard state can be described by a broken power-law with exponential cutoff (Fig- ure 5). Since the parameters of this phenomenological model are correlated with those of physical Comptonization models (see, e.g., Wilms et al. 2006, Fig. 11), we are justified in using the aforementioned simple continuum model for this paper fo- cusing on the spectroscopy of the wind. We describe the whole 0.5 -- 250 keV spectrum consistently with one broken power-law model, i.e., there is no need to fit the continuum locally. D c CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYG X-1 SYSTEM. I. 5 Fit Parameters of the Continuum Nondip Hard State Spectrum of Cyg X-1 Table 2 Parameter Unit Fit to the Chandra Joint Fit to Both the Chandra and RXTE Spectra Only Spectra 1021 cm- 2 3.52 ± 0.04 5.4 ± 0.4a keV 1.51 ± 0.01 · · · · · · · · · s- 1 cm- 2 keV- 1 1.15 ± 0.01 Photoabsorption NH (Broken) power-law Γ1 (HETGS) Γ1 (PCA) Ebreak Γ2 norm High-energy cutoff Ecut Efold Disk black body Adisk (Equation 6) k Tcol Narrow iron Kα line E0,narrow σnarrow Anarrow Broad iron Kα line E0,broad σbroad Abroad keV keV 103 keV keV eV (!) 10- 3 s- 1 cm- 2 keV keV 10- 3 s- 1 cm- 2 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 (fixed) 1.00 ± 0.01 1.04 ± 0.01 1.01 ± 0.01 · · · · · · 5.6 ± 0.1 6.0 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.3 11745 11274b- 10c 1.04 1.60 ± 0.01 1.73 ± 0.01 9.0+0.3 - 1.5 1.50 ± 0.01 1.33 ± 0.03 24+2- 3 204 ± 9 23+17 - 12 0.25+0.03 - 0.02 6.4001+0.0004 - 0.0092 < 0.1 1.0 ± 0.3 6.4 (fixed) 0.6 ± 0.1 4.3+2.7 - 0.5 1 (fixed) 0.99 ± 0.01 1.04 ± 0.01 1.02 ± 0.01 1.18 ± 0.03 1.03+0.02 - 0.03 5.6 ± 0.1 5.9 ± 0.1 4.6 ± 0.3 3.8 ± 0.3 12180 11274b + 293b - 25c 1.4 7.4 1.06 1.8 24 Relative flux calibration (constant factor) cMEG- 1 cMEG+1 cHEG- 1 cHEG+1 cPCA cHEXTE Pile-up scales γMEG- 1 γMEG+1 γHEG- 1 γHEG+1 Fit-statistics χ2 dof χ2 red 10- 2 s Å 10- 2 s Å 10- 2 s Å 10- 2 s Å Absorbed flux (pile-up corrected) S0.5- 10 keV F0.5- 10 keV S0.5- 250 keV F0.5- 250 keV photons s- 1 cm- 2 10- 9 erg s- 1 cm- 2 photons s- 1 cm- 2 10- 9 erg s- 1 cm- 2 · · · · · · b e H X X a C I 2 1 . a y L X X a C o i t a R 1 8 0 . 4 e H V X X e F 5 6 Energy [keV] 7 Figure 6. Chandra-HEG spectrum in the Fe line region. The model includes both the narrow and the broad Kα emission line, the latter as required by the si- multaneous RXTE-PCA data, and the Fe XXV and Ca XIX/XX absorption lines. Taking pile-up into account (Section 2.2), the nondip Chan- dra spectra alone can already be described quite well by a weakly absorbed, relatively flat power-law spectrum with a pho- ton index Γ1 = 1.51 ± 0.01 (Table 2). This result is consistent with the fact that the break energy of the broadband broken power-law spectrum is found at Ebreak = 9 keV, i.e., the Chan- dra data are virtually entirely in the regime of the (steeper) photon index Γ1. The onset of the exponential cutoff (with folding energy Efold) is at Ecut = 24 keV and thus also well above the spectral range of Chandra. As it is known that there are cross-calibration uncertainties between Chandra and RXTE (Kirsch et al. 2005), we use constant factors ci for the relative flux calibration of every spectrum and also separate parame- ters Γ1(HETGS) and Γ1(PCA), for which we find similar values within the joint model (see Table 2). In order to describe a weak soft excess, we add a thermal disk component, which accounts for ∼9 % of the unabsorbed 0.5 -- 10 keV flux. The disk has a color temperature of kTcol = 0.25 keV; similar to that found by Makishima et al. (2008) and Bałuci´nska-Church et al. (1995), who described the soft excess with a kT = 0.13 ± 0.02 keV blackbody only, but the temperature Tcol may be too high by a factor f & 1.7 (Shimura & Takahara 1995). The norm param- eter of the diskbb model is d/10 kpc(cid:19)2 Adisk = diskbb . norm = (cid:18) Rcol/km · cos θ , (6) where d is the distance and θ is the inclination of the disk, which can deviate from the orbital inclination i ≈ 35◦ (Herrero et al. 1995) as the disk may be precessing with a tilt δ ≈ 37◦ (Brocksopp et al. 1999). Rcol is related to the inner radius of the disk, Rin = η g(i) f 2· Rcol (with η ≈ 0.6- 0.7 and g(i) ≈ 0.7- 0.8; Merloni et al. 2000). In spite of these uncertainties and the large statistical error of Adisk (more than 50 %), the inner disk radius can be estimated to 1.5 RS . Rin . 10 RS if a distance d ≈ 2.5 kpc (Ninkov et al. 1987a) and a Schwarzschild radius RS ≈ 30 km (Herrero et al. 1995) are assumed. Thus, the disk is consistent with extending close to the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). The good S/N afforded by the RXTE-PCA data clearly re- veals an iron fluorescence Kα line. While the instrumental re- sponse of the proportional counters does not allow for a res- olution of the line profile details, i.e., whether it is narrow or relativistically broadened, the Chandra-HEG spectra (Figure 6) Unabsorbed luminosity, assuming d = 2.5 kpc (Ninkov et al. 1987a) L0.5- 10 keV L0.5- 250 keV 1037 erg s- 1 1037 erg s- 1 0.67 · · · 0.78 3.1 Notes. Error bars indicate 90% confidence intervals for one interesting parameter. a In the joint fit, photoabsorption was described with tbnew model (Wilms et al. 2000; Juett et al. 2006b) and the best-fitting abundances (see Section 3.3). b All data have been rebinned to contain ≥ 50 counts bin- 1. c The model contains actually more parameters, as the absorption lines have already been included (see Tables 4 -- 6). a 6 HANKE ET AL. do resolve a strong narrow component at 6.4 keV. Nevertheless, since the integrated flux of the Chandra measured line is insuf- ficient to account for all of the PCA residuals in this region, we include an additional broad feature to our modeling, which is also compatible with the Chandra spectrum. Given the rel- atively low S/N at these energies, we do not model the broad iron line with a proper physical model such as a relativisti- cally broadened line, but use a Gaussian with its energy fixed at 6.4 keV, as the latter is hardly constrained by the data. These re- sults illustrate the synergy of the simultaneous observation with complementary instruments, as the combination of narrow and broad line could only be revealed by the analysis with a joint model. Our global model for the continuum spectrum now enables us to address the features of the high-resolution Chandra spectra, which is the topic in the remainder of this section. 3.3. Neutral Absorption ) . u . f 5 − 0 1 ( x u l F ) n i b r e p ( s t n u o C 2 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 − 17 Fe L2 Fe L3 17.5 Wavelength [Å] 18 Absorbing columns can be measured most accurately from the discrete edges in high-resolution spectra at the ionization thresholds. We detect the most prominent L-shell absorption edge of iron and the K-shell absorption edges of oxygen and neon. Juett et al. (2004, 2006a) have inferred the fine struc- ture at those edges from earlier Chandra-HETGS observations of Cyg X-1 and other bright X-ray binaries: the Fe L2 and L3 edges, due to the ionization of a 2p1/2 or a 2p3/2 electron, re- spectively, are separately detectable at 17.2 Å and 17.5 Å. The O K-edge at 22.8 Å is accompanied by (1s→2p) Kα and higher (1s→ np) resonance absorption lines. The Kα line occurs at 23.5 Å for neutral O I and at lower wavelengths for ionized oxy- gen. In the case of neon, neutral atoms have closed L-shells, such that Ne I only shows a (1s→3p) Kβ absorption line close to the K-edge at 14.3 Å, while ionized neon also shows Kα ab- sorption lines, e.g., Ne II at 14.6 Å and Ne III at 14.5 Å. Im- proved modeling of the neutral absorption that takes these fea- tures into account has recently been included in the photoab- sorption model tbnew12 (Juett et al. 2006b), an extension of the commonly used tbvarabs model (Wilms et al. 2000). As part of the spectral model for the whole continuum, the tbnew model can be used to describe the absorption edges detected with the Chandra observation of Cyg X-1 discussed in this paper. Figure 7 shows the Fe L-edges requiring a blueshift by ∆λ/λ0 · c = (540 ± 230) km s- 1 of the tbnew model, which relies on the cross sections of metallic iron mea- sured by Kortright & Kim (2000). Unlike Schulz et al. (2002), Miller et al. (2005) and Juett et al. (2006a) have also found that the Fe L3 edge requires a small shift; their mean position of maximum optical depth is λFe L3 = 17.498 Å, but our value λFe L3 = (17.469± 0.014) Å is still lower. The shift could be caused by the Doppler effect due to a moving absorber, by a modified ionization threshold due to chemical bonds, or ioniza- tion of the iron atoms (van Aken & Liebscher 2002). In an anal- ysis of the Cyg X-1 high/soft and low/hard state, focused on this spectral region, J. Lee et al. (2008, in preparation) find that the Fe L-edges here can likely be modeled by a heterogeneous com- bination of gas and condensed matter of iron in combination with oxygen local to the source environment. If, as suggested by these authors, the magnitude of the shift is due to molecules and/or dust, this shift is one identifying signature of the compo- sition and charge state of the condensed state material. Such direct Chandra X-ray spectroscopic detection of dust via its 12 The code for tbnew is available online at http://pulsar.sternwarte.uni- erlangen.de/wilms/research/tbabs/ for beta testing and will soon be released. Figure 7. Spectral region around the Fe L-edges. The top panel shows the model flux in units of 10- 5 ph. s- 1 cm- 2 Å- 1 (solid line). The dashed lines de- scribe the unshifted model, see the text. The second panel shows the count rate of all the four HETGS spectra (MEG±1, HEG±1), which have been combined with a resolution of 10 mÅ, and the folded model. The bottom panel displays the residuals χ = (data -- model)/error. O I 1s−2p O II O III ) . u . f 5 − 0 1 ( x u l F ) n i b r e p ( s t n u o C 5 2 1 5 . 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 − 22 24 Wavelength [Å] 26 Figure 8. Same as in Figure 7, but for the spectral region around the O K-edge. Both MEG±1 spectra have been combined with a resolution of 0.1 Å. without Ne Ne I 1s−3p Ne III 1s−2p Ne II 1s−2p V III F e X V III F e X V III F e X F e X V III ) . u . f 5 − 0 1 ( x u l F ) n i b r e p ( s t n u o C 0 1 5 2 1 0 5 0 2 2 0 2 − 14.2 14.4 Wavelength [Å] 14.6 Figure 9. Same as in Figure 7, but for the spectral region around the Ne K- edge. All spectra have been combined with a resolution of 5 mÅ. The dotted lines show the absorbed continuum model without additional absorption lines. The light dashed line shows the model without the absorption of Ne. c c c Element 12 + log AISM element a Nelement/NFe Aelement/AISM element b O Ne Na Mg Al Si S Ar Ca Cr Fe 8.69 7.94 6.16 7.40 6.33 7.27 7.09 6.41 6.20 5.51 7.43 15.4 ± 0.3 3.91 ± 0.18 1.26 ± 0.15 2.16 ± 0.13 < 0.13 1.45 ± 0.17 0.6 ± 0.2 < 0.06 < 0.05 < 0.18 1 1.45 ± 0.01 2.07+0.04 - 0.03 40 ± 2 4.0 ± 0.1 < 1.8 3.8 ± 0.3 2.4+0.5 - 0.3 < 1.0 < 1.3 1.3+2.7 - 1.3 1.75 ± 0.03 c Nelement (1017 cm- 2) 38.1+0.4 - 0.3 9.6 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 5.3 ± 0.2 < 0.2 3.8 ± 0.3 1.6+0.3 - 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.02+0.05 - 0.02 2.52 ± 0.04 d Nelement (1017 cm- 2) 39.2 ± 2.3 9.43 ± 0.32 · · · 3.7 ± 1.3 · · · 2.3 ± 1.8 · · · · · · · · · · · · e Nelement (1017 cm- 2) 63 ± 14 7.1 ± 1.0 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ObsID 3407 (3.1×1037 erg s- 1) -- -- -- -- -- e Nelement (1017 cm- 2) 24 ± 3 7.4+0.7 - 0.3 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ObsID 3724 (soft state) -- -- -- -- -- e Nelement (1017 cm- 2) 29 ± 3 8.6 ± 0.7 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYG X-1 SYSTEM. I. 7 Column Density N and Abundance A = N/NH of Neutral Absorbers Detected Along the Line of Sight Toward Cyg X-1 Table 3 This work Schulz et al. (2002) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Juett et al. (2004, 2006a) Analysis by ObsID 107 ObsID 107 (L0.5- 10 kev = 1.6×1037 erg s- 1) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (L0.5- 10 kev = 0.7×1037 erg s- 1) ObsID 3814 1.5 ± 0.1 1.47+0.25 - 0.19 1.06+0.07 - 0.11 0.96 ± 0.09 Notes. a We use elemental abundances in the interstellar medium, AISM b The relative elemental abundance, Aelement/AISM c Nelement is the product of Aelement and NH (see Table 2). d Schulz et al. (2002) use the cross sections from Verner et al. (1993), and Kortright & Kim (2000) for Fe. e Juett et al. (2004, 2006a) use the cross section of Gorczyca & McLaughlin (2000) for O, Gorczyca (2000) for Ne, and Kortright & Kim (2000) for Fe. element according to Wilms et al. (2000), i.e., xspec_abund("wilm"); in ISIS. element, is a parameter of the tbnew model. associated edge structure was first suggested for observations of the Fe L-edge in the active galactic nucleus MCG- 6-30-15 (Lee et al. 2001) and for the observations of the Si K-edge in the microquasar GRS 1915+105 (Lee et al. 2002). The latter study associated the observed Si K-edge structure with SiO2, although the origin -- source environment or Chandra CCD gate structure -- was unclear in this case. The blueshift of (100± 130) kms- 1 which has been deter- mined for all other absorption edges is consistent with zero. The O K-edge can only be seen in the MEG spectra after heavy re- binning (Figure 8). Nevertheless, the Kα resonance absorption line of O I is clearly detected. The region around the Ne edge (Figure 9) is dominated by Fe XVIII absorption lines, possibly blending with the Kα absorption lines of Ne II and Ne III. No other strong edges are clearly visible in the spectrum. The Na K-edge (at 11.5 Å; Verner & Yakovlev 1995) blends with an ab- sorption line due to the 2s→3p excitation of Fe XXII. The Mg K-edge (at 9.5 Å) blends with the Ne X Ly δ absorption line. The Si K-edge (at 6.7 Å) is strongly affected by pile-up and blends with the Mg XII Ly β absorption line. The S K-edge (at 5.0 Å) is relatively weak. Neutral absorption from these ele- ments is nevertheless required within the tbnew model. The results for the individual abundances, Ai = Ni/NH, and re- sulting column densities, Ni, are presented in Table 3. The alpha process elements O, Ne, Mg, Si, and S are overabundant with respect to the interstellar medium (ISM) abundances as summa- rized by Wilms et al. (2000) and therefore suggest an origin in the system itself. The total column densities are also compared with the values obtained by Schulz et al. (2002) and Juett et al. (2004, 2006a) from other Chandra observations of Cyg X-1. Table 3 includes the corresponding source luminosities if they are reported in the literature (see also Section 4.4). The X-ray flux was highest during the soft state observation with the ob- servation identification (ObsID) 3724. The column densities confirm the conjecture of Juett et al. (2004) that a higher (soft) X-ray flux ionizes material local to the Cyg X-1 system and re- duces the neutral abundances. The inferred hydrogen column density NH (see Table 2) is in very good agreement with that from ASCA observations dur- ing the soft state in 1996, namely NH = (5.3± 0.2)× 1021 cm- 2 (Dotani et al. 1997), and also with NH = 6.2×1021cm- 2 obtained from two other different Chandra observations (Schulz et al. 2002; Miller et al. 2002, see also Section 4.4). We note that the large column density toward Cyg X-1 found by many on- line tools, (7.2- 7.8)×1021cm- 2, is obtained from a coarse grid -- with (0.675 deg)2 pixel size -- of NH measurements at 21 cm (Kalberla et al. 2005), which does not resolve the strong varia- tions of NH in the region around Cyg X-1 (Russell et al. 2007). 3.4. Absorption Lines of H- and He-Like Ions The high-resolution spectra reveal a large number of absorp- tion lines of highly ionized ions. The 1.5 -- 15 Å range is shown in Figure 10 as the ratio between the data and the continuum- model. As the line profiles are not fully resolved, we model each line l with a Gaussian profile Gl. In terms of the contin- uum flux model, Fcont, the global model reads F(λ) = e- τ (λ) · Fcont(λ) = "1 +Xl Gl(λ)# · Fcont(λ) . (7) m a r k t h e c o m m o n l i n e s ' r e s t w a v e l e n g t h s . ) I r o n L - s h e l l t r a n s i t i o n s ( l i n e s o f F e < X X V ) a r e s h o w n i n b l u e i n t h e o n l i n e j o u r n a l . r e s o l u t i o n o f 1 0 m Å , a n d a l l M E G ± 1 a n d H E G ± 1 s p e c t r a h a v e b e e n c o m b i n e d . T h e G a u s s i a n l i n e fi t s a n d i d e n t i fi c a t i o n s a r e s h o w n a s w e l l . ( T h e l a b e l s Ratio 1 0.5 1.5 2 0.5 Fe XIX Fe XIX Fe XIX Fe XIXFe X VII Fe X VIIIFe X VIII 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 8 1 2 1 2 . 2 Fe X VIII 1 2 . 4 Fe X Fe X VIII VIII Fe XIX O Ly d Fe X VII 1 2 . 6 1 2 . 8 1 3 O Ly g 1 3 . 2 Fe X VII Fe X VII 1 3 . 4 F i g u r e 1 0 . C h a n d r a ( n o n d i p ) s p e c t r u m o f C y g X - 1 , s h o w n a s r a t i o o f d a t a a n d c o n t i n u u m m o d e l ( T a b l e 2 ) . F o r v i s u a l c l a r i t y , t h e d a t a h a v e b e e n r e b i n n e d t o a W a v e l e n g t h [ Å ] 1 3 6 . 1 3 8 . 1 4 1 4 . 2 1 4 4 . 1 4 . 6 1 4 . 8 1 5 1 5 . 2 1 5 . 4 2 Ratio 1 1.5 Fe X XIIFe X Ne He b VIII Fe X X+X XII Fe X XIIFe X XI Fe X Ne Ly a VII Fe X Fe X VII Fe X XIFe X XII XI Fe X X Fe X XFe X X Fe X XFe XIX Fe X X Fe X XI Fe XIX Ne He a Fe XIXFe XIX Ratio 1 1.5 Ne Ly d Ne Ly g Fe X XNa Ly a Fe X Fe XIX VII−X X Ne Ly b Fe X Fe X Ne He e VII+X XIV XIV Fe XIX Fe X XII+X Fe X VII+X Na He i Ne He g XIII XIII 7 6 . 7 8 . 8 8 . 2 8 . 4 8 . 6 8 . 8 9 Na He f 9 . 2 Fe X VIII 9 . 4 Fe X Fe X XII XII 9 . 6 9 . 8 1 0 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 8 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 4 Ratio 1 1.2 0.8 1.4 0.8 Ratio 1 1.2 1.4 0.8 Ratio 1 1.2 1.4 0.8 5 6 . 5 8 . Si He b 3 6 . 3 8 . 6 4 Al Ly b Si Ly a 6 . 2 6 . 4 Al He a Al He iMg He b XII Fe X Fe X XIV Fe X XIII Mg Ly a 4 . 2 4 . 4 4 . 6 4 . 8 Fe X XI 6 . 6 6 . 8 Mg Ly d Al He b Si He a Si He fFe X Mg Ly g XIV Fe X XII 7 5 Mg He a Fe X X+X Mg He i XI Ne Ly zMg He fNe Ly e 7 . 2 7 . 4 Ne Ly d Mg Ly b Al Ly a Mg He d Mg He g 5 . 2 5 . 4 1 6 . 1 . 8 2 2 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 8 3 3 . 2 3 . 4 S Ly d Ar Ly a S Ly g Ar He a S He g S He b S Ly a Si Ly g S He aS He iS He f Si Ly b Si He g 8 H A N K E E T A L . Ratio 1 1.2 1.4 Fe Ly b ? Fe He b ? Fe Ly a Fe He a ? Fe Ka Ca He b Ca Ly a Ar Ly bCa He i Ar He g Ar He b CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYG X-1 SYSTEM. I. 9 Overview on the Detected Lines from H- and He-Like Ions: Theoretical Rest Wavelengths in Å Table 4 Transition Hydrogen-like (1 electron) 1s (2S1/2) → 2p (2P3/2,1/2) 1s (2S1/2) → 3p (2P3/2,1/2) 1s (2S1/2) → 4p (2P3/2,1/2) 1s (2S1/2) → 5p (2P3/2,1/2) 1s (2S1/2) → 6p (2P3/2,1/2) 1s (2S1/2) → 7p (2P3/2,1/2) 1s (2S1/2) → 8p (2P3/2,1/2) 1s (2S1/2) → 9p (2P3/2,1/2) O VIII 18.97 16.01 15.18 14.82 (14.63) (14.52) (14.45) (14.41) Ne X 12.13 10.24 9.71 9.48 9.36 9.29 9.25 ( 9.22) Na XI 10.03 8.46 8.02 7.83 ( 7.73) ( 7.68) ( 7.64) ( 7.61) Mg XII 8.42 7.11 (6.74) 6.58 6.50 6.45 (6.42) (6.40) Al XIII 7.17 6.05 5.74 (5.60) (5.53) (5.49) (5.47) (5.45) Si XIV 6.18 5.22 4.95 (4.83) (4.77) (4.73) (4.71) (4.70) S XVI 4.73 3.99 3.78 3.70 (3.65) (3.62) (3.60) (3.59) Ar XVIII 3.73 3.15 2.99 (2.92) (2.88) (2.86) (2.85) (2.84) Ca XX 3.02 (2.55) 2.42 (2.36) (2.33) (2.31) (2.30) (2.29) Fe XXVI (1.78) 1.50 1.43 (1.39) (1.37) (1.36) (1.36) (1.35) Ni XXVIII 1.53 1.29 1.23 (1.20) 1s (2S1/2) → ∞ (14.23) ( 9.10) ( 7.52) 6.32 5.38 (4.64) (3.55) (2.80) (2.27) 1.34 (1.15) Ly α Ly β Ly γ Ly δ Ly ǫ Ly ζ Ly η Ly θ · · · limit Transition Helium-like (2 electrons) f [em.] 1s2 (1S0) ← 1s2s (3S1) i [em.] 1s2 (1S0) ← 1s2p (3P1,2) r ≡ He α 1s2 (1S0) → 1s2p (1P1) 1s2 (1S0) → 1s3p (1P1) 1s2 (1S0) → 1s4p (1P1) 1s2 (1S0) → 1s5p (1P1) 1s2 (1S0) → 1s6p (1P1) 1s2 (1S0) → 1s7p (1P1) 1s2 (1S0) → 1s8p (1P1) He β He γ He δ He ǫ He ζ He η · · · limit O VII 22.10 21.80 21.60 18.63 (17.77) (17.40) (17.20) (17.09) (17.01) Ne IX (13.70) (13.55) 13.45 11.54 11.00 10.77 10.64 10.56 (10.51) Na X 11.19 11.08 11.00 9.43 8.98 8.79 ( 8.69) ( 8.63) ( 8.59) Mg XI 9.31 9.23 9.17 7.85 7.47 7.31 (7.22) (7.17) (7.14) Al XII 7.87 7.81 7.76 6.64 6.31 (6.18) (6.10) (6.06) (6.03) Si XIII 6.74 (6.69) 6.65 5.68 5.40 (5.29) 5.22 (5.19) (5.16) S XV 5.10 5.07 5.04 4.30 4.09 4.00 3.95 (3.92) (3.90) Ar XVII (3.99) 3.97 3.95 3.37 3.20 (3.13) (3.10) Ca XIX (3.21) 3.19 3.18 2.71 (2.57) (2.51) Fe XXV (1.87) (1.86) 1.85 1.57 1.50 1.46 Ni XXVII 1.60 1.59 (1.35) (1.28) (1.25) 1s2 (1S0) → 1s ∞ 16.77 10.37 8.46 (7.04) 5.94 5.09 (3.85) (3.01) 2.42 1.40 (1.20) Notes. Lines with (wavelengths in parentheses) are not detected in our Chandra-HETGS observation of Cyg X-1, while lines indicated with bold wavelengths are clearly detected and those with underlined wavelengths are detected as two components. The wavelengths of the lines are taken from the CXC atomic database ATOMDB and the table of Verner et al. (1996), those of the series limits (= K-ionization thresholds) are from Verner & Yakovlev (1995). Results from the Detected Absorption Lines from H- and He-Like Ions: Velocity Shifts v = (λ - λ0)/λ0 · c in km s- 1 Table 5 Ar XVIII - 322+712 - 617 - 750+710 - 451 Ca XX 164+838 - 402 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Fe XXVI · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · H-like Ly α Ly β Ly γ Ly δ Ly ǫ Ly series He-like He α He β He γ He δ He ǫ O VIII - 718+1716 - 281 - 90+187 - 185 - 39+85 - 81 - 109+1109 - 198 · · · - 41+67 - 72 O VII · · · 507+492 - 1020 · · · · · · · · · He series - 291 ± (>1000) Ne X - 128+35 - 27 - 72+50 - 47 7+64 - 64 - 192+46 - 46 288+213 - 177 - 97+28 - 20 Ne IX - 203+85 - 91 - 36+47 - 0 - 507+106 - 123 · · · - 93+54 - 59 - 158+35 - 56 Na XI 284+81 - 81 · · · · · · · · · · · · 207+104 - 101 Na X · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Mg XII - 34+26 - 34 17+27 - 73 · · · 3+922 - 1401 · · · - 38+27 - 28 Mg XI - 71+35 - 49 - 65+44 - 0 77+81 - 71 · · · · · · - 72+25 - 28 Al XIII - 171+88 - 104 344+431 - 448 · · · · · · · · · - 183+140 - 117 Al XII 286+187 - 574 59+54 - 46 · · · · · · · · · 135+205 - 234 Si XIV - 60+32 - 33 75+263 - 238 308+333 - 193 · · · · · · - 54+33 - 32 Si XIII - 30+23 - 46 18+165 - 195 - 19+320 - 234 · · · · · · - 86+26 - 41 S XVI - 43+114 - 95 · · · - 347+393 - 399 420+536 - 489 · · · - 90+74 - 73 S XV 84+127 - 138 609+785 - 1556 702+478 - 658 · · · · · · 47+37 - 52 · · · · · · · · · - 327+41 - 128 Ar XVII - 142+250 - 233 72+440 - 306 655+283 - 470 · · · · · · 2+8- 12 Ca XIX 1124+98 - 1069 - 74+616 - 422 · · · · · · · · · · · · Fe XXV - 116+501 - 531 · · · · · · · · · · · · - 21+0- 379 Notes. A negative velocity indicates a blue shift, due to the absorbing material moving toward the observer. Rows labeled with "Ly/He series" show the results from modeling the complete absorption line series of the corresponding ion at once with a single physical model (Section 3.5). 10 HANKE ET AL. Results from the Detected Absorption Lines from H- and He-Like Ions: Column Densities in 1016 cm- 2 Table 6 H-like Ly α Ly β Ly γ Ly δ Ly series He-like He α He β He γ He series O VIII 3+3- 1 15+3- 5 20+5- 8 11+13 - 20 36+18 - 12 O VII · · · 4+3- 6 · · · 0+4- 0 Ne X 3.5+0.2 - 0.3 10.8+1.2 - 1.3 51+5- 4 82+9- 7 42+10 - 4 Ne IX 1.5 ± 0.2 2.8+0.8 - 0.4 3.0 ± 1.5 6.3+1.3 - 1.6 Na XI · · · · · · · · · · · · 2.3+0.4 - 0.5 Na X · · · · · · · · · · · · Mg XII 5.2+0.2 - 0.3 8.0+1.6 - 1.8 · · · 8+18 - 8 Al XIII 1.8 ± 0.5 3+3- 2 · · · · · · Si XIV 7.1+0.3 - 0.4 18+5- 6 19 ± 13 · · · 7.2 ± 0.6 1.4 ± 0.5 10.1 ± 0.8 Mg XI 1.57+0.13 - 0.15 5.6 ± 0.9 8 ± 2 5+2- 1 Al XII 0.5+0.4 - 0.1 3.8+1.2 - 0.6 · · · 0.8+0.2 - 0.4 Si XIII 1.94+0.11 - 0.18 9+2- 3 8+5- 6 12 ± 3 S XVI 5.0+0.6 - 1.1 · · · 18+19 - 15 29+34 - 29 15+12 - 5 S XV 2.3+0.4 - 0.5 16+6- 9 23+11 - 14 15+2- 3 Ar XVIII 2.2+1.2 - 1.8 7+9- 7 · · · · · · 11+1- 6 Ar XVII 1.3 ± 0.6 4 ± 4 21+11 - 10 8+1- 4 Ca XX 2 ± 2 · · · · · · · · · · · · Ca XIX 1.0+0.9 - 0.8 11+5- 7 · · · · · · Fe XXVI · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Fe XXV 15+3- 4 · · · · · · 146+80 - 0 Notes. The column densities for the single lines have been calculated using Equation (11), assuming that the line is on the linear part of the curve of growth, which underestimates the column density for saturated lines. Rows labeled with "Ly/He series" show the results from modeling complete absorption line series (Section 3.5). From a Gaussian's centroid wavelength λ and the rest wave- length λ0 of the identified line, the radial velocity v = (λ - λ0)/λ0 · c (8) of the corresponding absorber can be inferred. With the defini- tion in Equation (7), the norm of Gl is just the equivalent width: Wλ,l := Z (cid:2)1 - Fl(λ)/Fcont(λ)(cid:3) dλ = Z Gl(λ) dλ (9) Wλ,l is related to the absorber's column density, as a bound -- bound transition i → j (with the rest frequency ν0 and oscillator strength fi j) in an absorbing plasma with column density Ni cre- ates the following line profile (see Mihalas 1978, Section9-2): e- τ (ν) = exp(cid:26)- Ni fi j √π e2 me c ∆νD H(cid:18) Γ 4π ∆νD , ν - ν0 ∆νD (cid:19)(cid:27) (10) Assuming pure radiation damping, the damping constant Γ equals the Einstein coefficient A ji. The Doppler broadening ∆νD = ν0 · ξ0/c is given by ξ0 turb, i.e., is due to the thermal and turbulent velocities of the plasma. For optically thin lines (with τ(ν) ≪ 1), the equivalent width is independent of ∆νD, such that the absorbing column density can be inferred (Spitzer 1978, Eq. 3-48; Mihalas 1978, §10-3): 2 = 2kT /mion + v2 Ni = mc2 ·Wλ π e2 · fi j λ2 0 = 1.13×1017 cm- 2 fi j - 2 Å(cid:19) ·(cid:18) λ0 ·(cid:18) Wλ mÅ(cid:19) (11) If the lines are, however, saturated, Wλ depends on ∆νD as well, and one has to construct the full "curve of growth" with several lines from a common ground state i in order to constrain Ni (see, e.g., Kotani et al. 2000). We have therefore performed a systematic analysis of absorp- tion line series: H-like ions are detected by their 1s → n p Ly- man series and He-like ions by their 1s2 → 1s n p resonance absorption series, see Table 4. For those lines that are clearly detected and not obviously affected by blends, the measured ve- locity shifts (Equation 8) are shown in Table 5. Most of the lines are detected at rather low projected velocity (v <200 km s- 1). Note that the systemic velocity of Cyg X-1/HDE 226868 is (- 7.0± 0.5) km s- 1 (Gies et al. 2003), and that the radial veloc- ity of both the supergiant and the black hole vanishes at or- bital phase φorb = 0, while the radial component of the focused stream should be maximal (likely to be up to 720 km s- 1, see Section 4.1). The column densities in Table 6 are calculated us- ing Equation (11), assuming that the line is on the linear part of the curve of growth. As the strongest lines are, however, often saturated, Equation (11) predicts too small column densi- ties from them. For weak lines, however, the equivalent width is most likely to be overestimated such that the quoted values may rather be upper limits. The properties of the lines (Einstein A-coefficients and quantum multiplicities, which determine the oscillator strength, as well as the rest wavelengths) are taken from Verner et al. (1996) and ATOMDB13 version 1.3.1. 3.5. Line Series of H-/He-Like and Fe L-Shell Ions As an alternative to the curve of growth, we chose to develop a model which implements the expected line profiles (Equa- tion 10) directly for all transitions of a series from a common ground state i. The model contains Ni, ξ0, and the systemic shift velocity v (Equation 8) as fit parameters, and thus avoids the use of equivalent widths at all. This approach allows for a systematic treatment of the iron L-shell transitions as well, which are often blended with other lines such that the different contributions to a line's equivalent width can hardly be sepa- rated when only single Gaussians are used. As an example, Figure 11 shows the Fe XIX complex between 12.8 Å and 14 Å. Lines from different Fe XIX transitions overlap, and so does the strong Ne IX r-line. Furthermore, the absorption features are of- ten rather weak and no prominent lines can be fitted, whereas the line series model can still be applied. Although a disad- vantage of this approach is the larger computational effort, it usually allows us to constrain the parameters of a line series more tightly. The model with physical absorption line series fits the data hardly worse than the model with single Gaussian lines: χ2 of 12812 instead of 12180 before (see Table 2) is obtained. The results are presented in the last row for the whole Ly/He series of Tables 5 and 6 for the H-/He-like ions, and in Table 7 for the 13 See http://cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb/. CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYG X-1 SYSTEM. I. 11 e l i f o r p e n i l d e z i l a m r o N 1 5 0 . 0 13 r I X g M r1 (r2) XI ? X ? Fe X Fe X 1 5 . 0 e t a r t n u o c d e z i l a m r o N i1 i2 f1 f2 G E H G E M e I X f) ( N i I X g M h y L e N y L e N f I X g M 14 9.15 9.2 9.25 9.3 9.35 e I X i) N e I X r ( N 13.5 Wavelength [Å] Figure 11. Absorption line series of Fe XIX between 12.8 Å and 14 Å. The Ne IX r line which blends with the complex at 13.4 -- 13.6 Å is also shown, and the expected positions of the Ne IX i and f emission lines are indicated. Parameters of the Absorption Line Series for Fe L-Shell Ions Table 7 Ion Fe XXIV Fe XXIII Fe XXII Fe XXI Fe XX Fe XIX Fe XVIII Fe XVII v (km s- 1) 21+31 - 30 120+68 - 94 - 27+33 - 35 - 156+30 - 29 - 283+33 - 48 - 116+46 - 41 - 60+51 - 54 - 277+56 - 42 N(ion) (1016 cm- 2) 4.9+0.7 - 1.0 2.2+0.4 - 0.2 2.3+0.2 - 0.4 2.5+0.2 - 0.4 3.0+0.3 - 0.2 3.1+0.2 - 0.3 1.8+0.3 - 0.2 1.4 ± 0.3 ξ0 (km s- 1) 82+21 - 22 410+68 - 140 193+61 - 64 260+59 - 68 333+57 - 92 251+80 - 68 203+72 - 56 78+26 - 25 Fe L-shell ions. The column densities inferred from the series model are generally in good agreement with the values derived from the single Gaussian fits for the higher transitions of H- or He-like ions (Table 6), while the α -- sometimes even β -- lines are saturated. These measurements can be used as input for wind or photoionization models, although a few columns are rather badly constrained if the thermal velocity ξ0 is left as a free parameter. As the line profiles are not resolved, there is a degeneracy between Doppler-broadened lines and narrow, but saturated lines. The notable fact that no strong wavelength shifts are observed is, however, independent of this degener- acy: almost all line series are consistent with a velocity between - 200 km s- 1 and +200 km s- 1. Lower ionization stages of the same element are usually seen at higher blueshift, like in the sequence Fe XXIII -- XXII -- XXI -- XX. 3.6. Emission Lines from He-Like Ions The transitions between the 1s2 ground state and the 1s2s or 1s2p excited states of He-like ions lead to the triplet of for- bidden (f), intercombination (i), and resonance (r) line, see Ta- ble 4. These lines provide a density and temperature diagnos- tics of an emitting plasma via the ratios R(ne) := F(f) / F(i) and G(Te) := [F(i) + F(f)] / F(r) of the fluxes F in the r-, i-, and f-line (see, e.g., Gabriel & Jordan 1969; Porquet & Dubau 2000). In this observation, the dipole-allowed resonance transi- tions are seen as absorption lines, as an absorbing plasma is Wavelength [Å] Figure 12. Mg XI triplet of resonance (r), intercombination (i), and forbidden (f) lines in the Chandra-HETGS spectrum. The MEG data are shown with an offset of - 0.5. While the ion/line labels indicate the rest wavelengths, the abbreviations rn, in, and fn label the actual line positions (see Table 8). Parameters of the Lines of the Mg XI Triplet Table 8 Line Component Mg XI r Mg XI r? Mg XI i Mg XI i Mg XI f Mg XI f r1 (r2) i1 i2 f1 f2 λ (Å) 9.167+0.001 - 0.002 9.190+0.004 - 0.003 9.232 ± 0.003 9.261+0.002 - 0.003 9.311+0.004 - 0.001 9.328+0.009 - 0.003 v (km s- 1) - 70+35 - 49 `700+120 - 90 ´ 14+107 - 105 968+52 - 110 - 110+130 - 34 454+293 - 111 Wλ (mÅ) - 8.6+0.8 - 0.7 - 3.5 ± 0.9 +1.5+1.5 - 0.6 +1.7+1.1 - 0.9 +2.5+0.9 - 1.2 +1.3+0.9 - 1.0 Notes. The shift velocity v and equivalent width Wλ are given by Equations (8) and (9). Note that the (r2) component is likely to be caused by absorption from blueshifted transitions of Fe XXI, Fe XX, and Ne X. detected in front of the X-ray source. For the same reason, we cannot use the Fe L-shell density diagnostics (Mauche et al. 2005) as, e.g., the Fe XXII emission lines at 11.77 Å and 11.92 Å used by Mauche et al. (2003) are both seen in absorp- tion. But we can still use the detected He-i and -f emission lines to estimate the density via the R-ratio, noting the caveat that the densities are systematically overestimated in the pres- ence of an external UV radiation field, as photoexcitation of the 1s2s(cid:0)3S1(cid:1) → 1s2p(cid:0)3P(cid:1) transition depopulates the upper level of the f-line in favor of the i-line and leads to a lower R-ratio (see, e.g., Mewe & Schrijver 1978; Kahn et al. 2001; Wojdowski et al. 2008). The i- and f-lines of the Mg XI triplet are seen as two distinct components each -- one with almost no shift, which is consistent with the r-absorption line, and the other one at a redshift of 400 -- 1000 km s- 1 (see Figure 12 and Table 8). Given these two emis- sion components and their Doppler shifts, one could be tempted to identify the absorption feature at 9.19 Å with a second red- shifted Mg XI r line, but our model for the complete absorption line series (Section 3.5) predicts that the blueshifted 2s → 4p transitions from the ground states of Fe XXI and Fe XX, as well as the Ne X 1s → 10p transition, account for most of the absorp- tion seen at 9.19 Å. Table 9 shows the R-ratios obtained for the two pairs of lines as well as the corresponding densities accord- z 12 HANKE ET AL. Electron Densities Corresponding to R = F(f)/F(i) Ratios Table 9 Solutions to Equation (15) for the Model of Equation (13) Table 10 Component First pair of i and f lines (unshifted) Second pair of i and f lines (redshifted) Measurement R1(Mg XI) = 1.6+0.7 - 0.6n R2(Mg XI) = 0.8 ± 0.5n 2.3 1.6 1.0 1.3 0.8 0.3 Note. a A temperature between 0.3 and 8 MK is assumed and UV-photoexcitation is not considered. Model Calculations by Porquet & Dubau (2000)a R(Mg XI) ne (1012 cm- 3) 1.0. . . 4.5 3.5. . . 10 8 . . . 22 5. . . 15 12. . . 28 43. . . 91 ing to the calculations of Porquet & Dubau (2000, Fig. 8e), ne- glecting the influence of the UV radiation of HDE 226868 on the R-ratio. The unshifted lines would then be caused by a plasma with an electron density ne,1 ≈ 5×1012 cm- 3; the redshifted pair of lines seems to stem from another plasma component with ne,2 ≫ ne,1. A more detailed discussion of these densities is presented in Section 4.1. The S/N of the spectrum above 20 Å is not high enough to describe the O VII triplet. The Ne IX triplet blends with sev- eral Fe XIX lines (Figure 11). Na X i- and f-lines are likely to be present with several components, but those cannot be distin- guished clearly. Similar as for Mg, there are also two i-lines of Al XII at shifts of - 477+120 - 228 km s- 1, re- spectively, but no f-line is detected due to a blend with the strong Mg XI He β absorption line and especially an Fe XXII 1s22s2p(2s→5p) absorption line at 7.87 Å. Similarly, the Si XIII i-line is not detected as it overlaps with absorption features probably due to nearly neutral Si K-edge structures. (Further- more, the flux of the Si XIII f-line might be underestimated as it blends with the Mg XII Ly γ line.) The i- and f-lines of He-like sulfur are detected with R(S XV) = 0.61+1.31 - 0.60, but S XV has not been modeled by Porquet & Dubau (2000). Below 4 Å, the S/N below is again not high enough to resolve further triplets from heavier elements such as argon, calcium, or iron. - 240 km s- 1 and +333+156 4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS In the following, we discuss our results and derive constraints on the stellar wind in the accretion region. 4.1. Velocity and Density of the Stellar Wind While a spherically symmetric model for the stellar wind in the HDE 226868/Cyg X-1 system can be excluded by ob- servations (see, e.g., Gies & Bolton 1986b; Gies et al. 2003; Miller et al. 2005; Gies et al. 2008), a symmetric velocity law v(r) = v∞ · f (r/R⋆) (12) is usually assumed to obtain a first estimate of the particle den- sity in the wind. The fraction f of the terminal velocity v∞ is often parameterized by (Lamers & Leitherer 1993, Equation 3) f (x) = f0 + (1 - f0)·(cid:0)1 - 1/x(cid:1)β with f0 := v0/v∞, where v0 is the velocity at the base of the wind (x = 1). The simple model for the radiatively driven wind of isolated stars by Castor et al. (1975) is obtained for (for x ≥ 1) (13) nH(x) (1010 cm- 3) 440 110 110 110 22 22 22 4.4 4.4 4.4 d(x) 200 f0 = v0/v∞ 0.005 50 50 50 10 10 10 2 2 2 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 β x = r/R⋆ 2100 · f (x) for β = βmax < ∞ 1 ≤ 1 ≤ 1.01 ≤ 2 ≤ 1.08 ≤ 3 ≤ 1.18 ≤ 1 ≤ 1.08 ≤ 2 ≤ 1.29 ≤ 3 ≤ 1.48 ≤ 1 ≤ 1.36 ≤ 2 ≤ 1.69 ≤ 3 ≤ 1.97 11 ≤ 41 ≤ 36 ≤ 30 ≤ 180 ≤ 127 ≤ 95 ≤ 570 ≤ 368 ≤ 271 Note. The binary separation a = 41 R⊙ corresponds to xa = a/R⋆ = 2.4. β = 1/2. The photoionization of the wind, however, sup- presses its acceleration (Blondin 1994), such that a smaller f (e.g., a larger β within the same model) is required in the Strömgren zone. Gies & Bolton (1986b) have explained the orbital variation of the 4686 Å He II emission line profile of Cyg X-1 with a similar model for the focused wind, where v∞, R⋆, and β depend on the angle θ from the binary axis. β was interpolated between 1.60 and 1.05 for θ between 0 and 20◦. The value β(θ = 20◦) = 1.05 is, however, often used for a spherically symmetrical wind as well (Lachowicz et al. 2006; Szostek & Zdziarski 2007; Poutanen et al. 2008). Vrtilek et al. (2008) use f0 = 0.01 to avoid numerical singularities and fit the (relatively low) value β ≈ 0.75 to their models for UV v0 is likely to be of the order of the thermal veloc- lines. ity of H atoms, which is (2kT /mH)1/2 = 23 km s- 1 and corre- sponds to f0 = 0.011 for HDE 226868's effective temperature Teff = 32 000 K and v∞ = 2100 km s- 1 (Herrero et al. 1995). With the mean molecular weight per H atom, µ ≈ 1.4,14 the continuity equation M⋆ = µmH nH(r) · 4πr2 v(r) gives the following estimate for the hydrogen density profile: nH(r) = M⋆/(µmH) 4πR2 ⋆v∞ · d(r/R⋆) with d(x) = x- 2/ f (x) (14) Using the parameters of HDE 226868 ( M⋆ = 3×10- 6 M⊙ yr- 1, R⋆ = 17 R⊙; Herrero et al. 1995; Nowak et al. 1999, Table 1), Equation (14) predicts also summarized by nH(r) = 2.2×1010 cm- 3 · d(r/R⋆) . (15) 0 and 1 ≤ x ≤ p1/( f0d) Equation (14) can only be solved within the model of Equa- tion (13) -- or any other model for f in Equation (12) with f (x) ≥ f0 -- for d < f - 1 (16) For f0 ≈ 0.01, the value d ≈ 190 -- which would be required to explain the density15 nH,1 ≈ 4.2×1012 cm- 3 obtained from the unshifted Mg XI triplet (Section 3.6) -- can never be reached within our model for the continuous spherical wind. This result shows that the density is likely to be overestimated by an R-ratio analysis which ignores the strong UV-flux of the O9.7 star. Ta- ble 10 lists therefore some solutions to Equation (15) for much lower densities as well. Due to the additional constraint that the radial velocity is less than 100 km s- 1 (Table 8), we suggest . 14 The helium abundance per H atom is ≈10% (Wilms et al. 2000). 15 A plasma of fully ionized H and He contains ≈1.2 electrons per H atom. CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYG X-1 SYSTEM. I. 13 that the first emission component stems from close to the stel- lar surface. Although the simple wind model of Equation (13) may not be appropriate in this region, the results of Table 10 are rather insensitive to the assumptions on the velocity law, as a wide range of β values was considered, but mostly depend on the wind's initial velocity v0, for which we have used a reason- able estimate. Note that f0 and d also depend on v∞, but their product, which is important in Equation (16), does not. In spite of the systematic errors of the (absolute) density anal- ysis with the R-ratio, we infer that the second plasma com- ponent is much denser relative to the first one. As it is seen at a larger redshift of 400 -- 1000 km s- 1, we favor its identifi- cation with the focused wind. The two emission components could also be caused coincidentally by dense clumps in the stel- lar wind (which are common for O-stars; e.g., Oskinova et al. 2007; Lépine & Moffat 2008), but the interpretation as a slow base of the wind close to the stellar surface and a focused wind between the accreting black hole and its donor star provides a consistent description of both emission components: an undis- turbed wind (with v∞ and f0 as above, and β = 1.05 → 1.6) would reach a velocity of v(a) ≈ 900 ← 1200 km s- 1 in the dis- tance of the black hole. The focused wind in the orbital plane would then be detected with a projected velocity v(a) sini = 500 ← 700 km s- 1 at φorb = 0. While photoionization reduces the efficiency of acceleration for the spherical wind, the denser focused wind is less strongly affected due to self-shielding and reaches the expected velocity. It is an observational fact that the focused wind has another ionization structure: optical emis- sion lines (Hα, He II λ4686) from ions which only exist at a low ionization parameter have been observed in the focused stream (see, e.g., Gies & Bolton 1986b; Ninkov et al. 1987b; Gies et al. 2003). For the spherical wind, however, Gies et al. (2008) have conjectured that the part between Cyg X-1 and the donor star might be completely ionized in the soft state. Our observations show that the situation in the hard state may be similar. 4.2. Modeling of the Photoionization Zone We use the photoionization code XSTAR 2.1ln7b16 (Kallman & Bautista 2001) to model the photoionization zone. As the latter is quite complex (due to the inhomogeneous wind density, which is strongly entangled with the X-ray flux), we do not claim to describe the photoionized wind self-consistently, but only want to derive a first approximation. For an optically thin plasma, the relative population of a given atom's ions is merely a function of the ionization parameters ξ(r) = L nH r2 = L37 n13 r2 12 erg cm s- 1 , (17) where L37 is the ionizing source luminosity above 13.6 eV in 1037 erg s- 1, n13 is the hydrogen density in 1013 cm- 3 and r12 is the distance from the source in 1012 cm. For Cyg X-1 as observed in the hard state, extrapolation of the unabsorbed model obtained by our analysis (Table 2) gives L37 ≈ 3.5. Although there are obviously strong variations in the density, the XSTAR calculation has been performed with constant n13 = 0.01, which is the average of nH(r) from Equa- tion (15) for R⋆ ≤ r ≤ a. Figure 13 shows the resulting popu- lation of Fe ions. The ionization parameters at which the pop- ulation distributions of some ions of interest peak, as well as the corresponding full width at half maximum (FWHM), are presented in Table 11. We have also included Si IV, N V, and 16 See http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/lheasoft/xstar/xstar.html. K−shell ions L−shell ions I V X X e F V X X e F I V X X e F X X e F I I I X X e F I X X e F I I X X e F I X X e F 6 . 0 n o i t a l u p o p e v i t a l e R 4 . 0 2 . 0 I I I I I V X e F V X e F 0 3 2.5 log x 2 Figure 13. Relative population of the ionization stages of iron as a function of the ionization parameter ξ = L/(nH r2), as calculated with XSTAR for L37 = 3.5 and n13 = 0.01. Ionization Parameters for Peak Ion Populations Table 11 Ion Fe XXVI Fe XXV Fe XXIV Fe XXIII Fe XXII Fe XXI Fe XX Fe XIX Fe XVIII Fe XVII Ca XX Ca XIX Ar XVIII Ar XVII S XVI S XV Si XIV Si XIII Si IV Mg XII Mg XI Ne X Ne IX O VIII O VII N V C IV log ξ 2.91 2.75 2.65 2.58 2.51 2.44 2.32 2.12 2.01 1.97 2.69 2.39 2.55 2.22 2.38 2.08 2.21 1.96 1.09 2.06 1.82 1.94 1.74 1.80 1.62 1.51 1.48 FWHM(log ξ) r12 = `L37/n13/10log ξ´1/2 0.27 0.32 0.30 0.28 0.31 0.36 0.44 0.40 0.23 0.14 0.56 0.54 0.65 0.50 0.69 0.43 0.65 0.39 0.18 0.58 0.31 0.40 0.24 0.26 0.22 0.01 0.19 0.6 -- 0.8 0.7 -- 1.0 0.8 -- 1.1 0.8 -- 1.1 0.9 -- 1.3 0.9 -- 1.4 1.0 -- 1.7 1.2 -- 1.9 1.6 -- 2.0 1.8 -- 2.1 0.7 -- 1.2 0.9 -- 1.6 0.7 -- 1.5 1.0 -- 1.8 0.8 -- 1.7 1.2 -- 2.0 0.9 -- 2.0 1.5 -- 2.4 4.7 -- 5.7 1.2 -- 2.3 1.8 -- 2.6 1.6 -- 2.5 2.1 -- 2.8 1.9 -- 2.6 2.5 -- 3.2 3.25 -- 3.30 3.3 -- 4.1 Notes. We list the range in ionization parameter and distance for the maximum ion population (Figure 13) obtained in an XSTAR simulation with L37 = 3.5 and n13 = 0.01. Note that the binary separation in units of 1012 cm is a12 = 2.9. C IV for a comparison with the work of Vrtilek et al. (2008) and Gies et al. (2008). The H- and He-like ions detected with Chandra only appear at considerable distance from the X-ray source. Taking into account that the photons emanating from Cyg X-1 first propagate through a lower density wind and that the (eventually stalled) wind of higher density is only reached in the vicinity of the star, the actual distances will be even larger than the r12 values quoted in Table 11. 14 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.0 Figure 14. Gray-scale image of vrad,BH(rrr) of Equation (18), i.e., projected wind velocity against the black hole. A spherically symmetric velocity law given by Equations (12) and (13) with v∞ = 2100 km s- 1, f0 = 0.01, and β = 1.05 is assumed. The star and the black hole are shown as filled black circles; the size of the latter is the accretion radius 2GMBH/v(a)2. On the black circle passing through the center of the star and through the black hole vrad,BH(rrr) is 0 since α(rrr) = 90◦. Positive velocities (+) are seen only within this circle; a lighter gray means a larger redshift. Negative velocities (- ) can likewise only occur outside of this circle; a lighter gray here means a larger blueshift. The dashed gray lines of constant vrad,BH are shown from - 1400 km s- 1 to +1000 km s- 1 in steps of 200 km s- 1. The two highlighted sectors contain all observable lines of sight toward the black hole (after rotation in this plane) for the inclination i = 35◦. The labels show the corresponding orbital phases. 4.3. Origin of Redshifted X-Ray Absorption Lines Additional constraints on the accretion flow can be derived by considering the Doppler shifts observed in absorption lines (Sections 3.4 and 3.5). Models for the wind velocity like that of Equations (12) and (13) predict a velocity vvv(rrr) at the position rrr in the stellar wind. But only the projection of vvv against the black hole, vrad,BH, can eventually be observed as radial velocity in an X-ray absorption line. With the angle α(rrr) between vvv(rrr) and the direction from rrr toward the black hole, vrad,BH(rrr) is vrad,BH(rrr) = cos α(rrr) · vvv(rrr) . (18) Assuming a velocity field with radial symmetry with respect to the star, α(rrr) is just the angle at rrr between the star and the black hole. For example, α is 90◦ (and vrad,BH is therefore 0) on the sphere containing the center of the star and the black hole diametrically opposed. Redshifted absorption lines can only be observed from wind material inside this sphere, while the part of the wind outside of it is always seen at a blueshift -- a fact which is independent of the assumed velocity field as long as it is directed radially away from the star. For a spherically symmetrical wind model, any line of sight can be rotated to an equivalent one in a half-plane limited by the binary axis. Only a sector with half-opening angle i can be observed unless the system's inclination is i = 90◦. Figure 14 shows the projected velocity vrad,BH(rrr) for a simple wind model and two sectors containing all observable lines of sight toward Cyg X-1 for an inclination of i = 35◦. We now investigate the region where the projected wind ve- locity (Figure 14) is compatible with the observed Doppler HANKE ET AL. − + 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 orb = 0.0 ] s p c [ e t a r t n u o c M S A E T X R V e k 2 1 − 5 1 . 0 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 # 3724 # 3407 # 107 # 2415 # 1511 0.7 0.8 orbital phase f 0.9 orb # 3814 1 Figure 15. Orbital phase and mean ASM count rate of the previously reported Chandra observations of Cyg X-1 (ObsID 3814 is presented in this paper). shifts (Tables 5 and 7). We are confident that this method allows for the identification of the absorption regions, as the low observed velocities are always found close to the α = 90◦ sphere -- independent of the wind model. For most of the in- vestigated ions (Ne X, Mg XII, Si XIV and XIII, S XV, Ar XVII, Fe XIX and XVIII) the inferred distance from the black hole agrees with the predictions of Table 11, e.g., the projected ve- locity - 117 km s- 1 ≤ vNe X ≤ - 69 km s- 1 measured for Ne X is (during 0.93 ≤ φorb ≤ 1) obtained at r12 = 1.78 ± 0.07. For many other ions, both results are still very similar: e.g., Ne IX with - 214 km s- 1 ≤ vNe IX ≤ - 123 km s- 1 is expected at r12 = 1.95± 0.07 from the vrad,BH model and at r12 = 2.1 -- 2.8 from the photoionization model. Only for the highly ionized iron lines, the small distances are -- as already anticipated in Sec- tion 4.2 -- underestimated by the XSTAR simulation run with constant average density, which overestimates the wind den- sity close to the black hole. For example, the velocity range - 9 km s- 1 ≤ vFe XXIV ≤ 52 km s- 1 measured for Fe XXIV corre- sponds to r12 = 1.51 ± 0.07, while the population of this ion peaks at r12 = 0.8 -- 1.1 within the model presented in Table 11. 4.4. Previous ChandraObservations In previous Chandra-HETGS observations of Cyg X-1, the stellar wind was seen under different viewing angles, or the X- ray source was in other spectral states (see Figure 15), which probably means that the properties of the wind were also dif- ferent. Schulz et al. (2002) have analyzed the 14 ks observation ObsID 107 performed in 1999 October (at φorb ≈ 0.74),17 when Cyg X-1 was in a transitional state. They derive a neutral col- umn density of NH = 6.2×1021 cm- 2 from prominent absorp- tion edges (see also Table 3) and detect some emission and ab- sorption lines with indications of P Cygni profiles. Miller et al. (2005) have investigated the focused wind with the 32 ks ob- servation ObsID 2415 of Cyg X-1 in an intermediate state, per- formed in 2001 January (at φorb ≈ 0.77). They report absorp- tion and emission lines of H- and He-like resonance lines of Ne, Na, Mg, and Si with a mean redshift of ≈100 km s- 1, as density is 6.2×1021 cm- 2 (Miller et al. 2002). Marshall et al. (2001) describe Ly α and He α absorption lines, redshifted by (450 ± 150) km s- 1 from the 12.6 ks observation ObsID 1511 well as some lines of highly ionized Fe and Ni. The column of Cyg X-1 in the hard state, performed in 2001 January (at 17 Note that Schulz et al. (2002) and Miller et al. (2005) quote an erroneous date and thus the wrong orbital phase φorb = 0.93 6= 0.74 for this observation. f CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY OF THE FOCUSED WIND IN THE CYG X-1 SYSTEM. I. 15 φorb ≈ 0.83). Chang & Cui (2007) report dramatic variability in the 30 ks observation ObsID 3407 performed in 2001 October (at φorb ≈ 0.88), when Cyg X-1 reached its soft state. While a large number of absorption lines (mostly redshifted, but not by a consistent velocity) is identified in the first part of their observa- tion, most of them weaken significantly or cannot be detected at all during the second part. The complete ionization of the wind due to a sudden density decrement is given as a possible explanation. Feng et al. (2003) detect asymmetric absorption lines with the 26 ks observation ObsID 3724 of Cyg X-1 in the soft state, performed in 2002 July (at φorb = 0). The line cen- ters are almost at their rest wavelengths, but the red wings are more extended, especially for the transitions of highest ionized ions, which they explain by the inflowing focused wind reach- ing both the highest redshift and ionization parameter closest to the black hole. The interpretation of the absorption lines presented in the pre- vious section describes our observation consistent with wind and photoionization models. It can, however, not be applied to all of the other observations; the model of Figure 14 nei- ther predicts a conspicuously high redshift at φorb ≈ 0.83 and at a higher soft X-ray flux (ObsID 1511), nor a positive red- shift at φorb ≈ 0.77 at a still higher flux (ObsID 2415, see Fig- ure 15). Inhomogeneities (e.g., density enhancements in shield- ing clumps) and asymmetries of the wind (e.g., due to noniner- tial forces in the binary system) may therefore play an important role in these cases. 4.5. Summary In this paper, we have presented a Chandra-HETGS observa- tion of Cyg X-1 during superior conjunction of the black hole, which allows us to detect the X-ray absorption signatures of the stellar wind of HDE 226868. The light curve near φorb = 0 is shaped by absorption dips; these are, however, excluded from this analysis by selecting nondip times of high count rate only. At a flux of ∼0.25 Crab, we have to deal with moderate pile- up in the grating spectra, for which can be accounted very well with the simple_gpile2 model. The continuum of both Chandra's soft and RXTE's broadband X-ray spectrum has been described consistently by a single model, consisting of an empirical broken power-law spectrum with high-energy cutoff (which is typical for the hard state) and a subordinated disk component with an inner radius close to the ISCO. The joint modeling of both spectra reveals the presence of both a narrow and a relativistically broadened fluorescence Fe Kα line. Chandra has resolved absorption edges of neutral atoms with an overabundance of metals, suggesting an origin not only in the ISM, but also in the stellar wind of the evolved supergiant. The previously suspected anticorrelation of neutral column densi- ties and X-ray flux, which is due to photoionization, is con- firmed. Absorption lines of highly ionized ions are produced where the wind becomes extremely photoionized. For H- and He-like ions, Lyman and He-series are detected up to the Ly or He ǫ line, which we use to measure the column density and velocity of absorbing ions. For the wealth of Fe L-shell transi- tions, column densities can best be obtained by directly using a physical model for the complete line series of an ion. The nondip spectrum shows almost no Doppler shifts, probably in- dicating that we have excluded the focused wind by our selec- tion of nondip times. We have also detected two plasma com- ponents in emission by two pairs of i- and f-lines of He-like Mg XI. The first one is roughly at rest and we identify it with the base of the spherical wind close to the stellar surface. The second plasma component is denser and observed at a redshift that is compatible with the focused wind. A simple XSTAR simulation indicates that most of the observed ions only exist in a distance of the black hole, where the velocity of a spher- ical wind, projected against the black hole, is low -- which is a consistent explanation of the small Doppler shifts observed in absorption lines. We review the previously reported Chan- dra observations of Cyg X-1 and find that not all of them can be described in the same picture, as the wind may be affected by asymmetries or inhomogeneities. A detailed spectroscopy of the absorption dips, which might shed more light on the focused wind, will be presented in a subsequent paper. We are grateful to A. Juett for her help with the data reduction and her contributions to tbnew model. We thank A. Young, J. Xiang, and M. Böck for helpful discussions, J. Houck for his support on ISIS and T. Kallman for his help with XSTAR. M. H. and J. W. acknowledge funding from the Bundesminis- terium für Wirtschaft und Technologie through the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt under contract 50OR0701. M. N. is supported by NASA Grants GO3-4050B and SV3- 73016. We thank the International Space Science Institute, Berne, Switzerland, and the MIT Kavli Institute for Space Re- search, Cambridge, MA, USA, for their hospitality during the preparation of this work. REFERENCES Bałuci´nska-Church, M., Belloni, T., Church, M.J., & Hasinger, G. 1995, A&A, 302, L5 Bałuci´nska-Church, et al. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 861 Belloni, T., et al. 1996, ApJ, 472, L107 Blondin, J.M. 1994, ApJ, 435, 756 Bolton, C.T. 1972, Nature, 240, 124 Bondi, H., & Hoyle, F. 1944 MNRAS, 104, 273 Bowyer, S., Byram, E.T., Chubb, T.A., & Friedman, H. 1965, Science, 147, 394 Brocksopp, et al. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 1063 Cadolle Bel, M., et al. 2006, A&A, 446, 591 Canizares, C.R., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1144 Castor, J.I., Abbott, D.C., & Klein, R.I. 1975, ApJ, 195, 157 Chang, C., & Cui, W. 2007 ApJ, 663, 1207 Conti, P.S. 1978 A&A, 63, 225 Chandra X-ray Center 2005, The Chandra ABC Guide to Pileup, http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/download/doc/pileup_abc.ps Chandra X-ray Center 2006, The Chandra Proposers' Observatory Guide, http://cxc.harvard.edu/proposer/POG/ Davis, J.E. 2002, in High Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy with XMM-Newton and Chandra, ed. G. Branduardi-Raymont, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002hrxs.confE..11D Davis, J.E. 2003, in Proc. SPIE 4851, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Telescopes and Instruments for Astronomy, ed. J.E. Trümper, & H.D. Tananbaum (Bellingham, WA:SPIE), 101 Dotani, T., et al. 1997 ApJ, 485, L87 Doty, J.P. 1994, The All Sky Monitor for the X-ray Timing Explorer, Technical report, MIT, http://xte.mit.edu/XTE.html Feng, Y.X., Tennant, A.F., & Zhang, S.N. 2003 ApJ, 597, 1017 Friend, D.B., & Castor, J.I. 1982 ApJ, 261, 293 Gabriel, A.H., & Jordan, C. 1969, MNRAS, 145, 241 Garmire, G.P., et al. 2003, in Proc. SPIE 4851, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Telescopes and Instruments for Astronomy, ed. J.E. Truemper, & H.D. Tananbaum (Bellingham, WA:SPIE), 28 Gies, D.R., & Bolton, C.T. 1982 ApJ, 260, 240 Gies, D.R., & Bolton, C.T. 1986a, ApJ, 304, 371 Gies, D.R., & Bolton, C.T. 1986b, ApJ, 304, 389 Gies, D.R., et al. 2003, ApJ, 583, 424 Gies, D.R., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1237 Gleissner, T., et al. 2004a, A&A, 425, 1061 Gleissner, T., et al. 2004b, A&A 414, 1091 Gorczyca, T.W. 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 024702 Gorczyca, T.W., & McLaughlin, B.M. 2000, J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Phys., 33, L859 Gruber, D.E., et al. 1996, A&AS, 120, C641 Hatchett, S., & McCray, R. 1977, ApJ, 211, 552 Herrero, A., et al. 1995, A&A, 297, 556 Houck, J.C. 2002, in High Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy with XMM-Newton and Chandra, ed. G. Branduardi-Raymont, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002hrxs.confE..17H. Humphreys, R.M. 1978, ApJS, 38, 309 Ishibashi, K. 2006, Specification for finding zeroth order positions in grating data analysis, http://space.mit.edu/CXC/docs/memo_fzero_1.3.ps 16 HANKE ET AL. Jahoda, K., et al. 1996, in Proc. SPIE 2808, EUV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy, Vol. VII ed. O.H. Siegmund, & M.A. Gummin (Bellingham, WA:SPIE), 59 Juett, A.M., Schulz, N.S., & Chakrabarty, D. 2004, ApJ, 612, 308 Juett, A.M., Schulz, N.S., Chakrabarty, D., & Gorczyca, T.W. 2006a, ApJ, 648, 1066 Juett, A.M., Wilms, J., Schulz, N.S., & Nowak, M.A. 2006b, BAAS, 38, 921 Kahn, S.M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L312 Kalberla, P.M.W., et al. 2005, A&A, 440, 775 Kallman, T., & Bautista, M. 2001, ApJS, 133, 221 Karitskaya, E.A., et al. 2006, Inf. Bull. Variable Stars, 5678, 1 Kirsch, M.G., et al. 2005, in Proc. SPIE 5898 UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy, Vol. XIV, ed. O.H.W. Siegmund (Bellingham, WA:SPIE), 22 Kortright, J.B., & Kim, S.-K. 2000, Phys. Rev. B, 62, 12216 Kotani, T., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 413 Lachowicz, P., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1025 Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., & Leitherer, C. 1993, ApJ, 412, 771 Lee, J.C., et al. 2001, ApJ, 554, L13 Lee, J.C., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 1102 Lépine, S., & Moffat, A.F.J. 2008, AJ, 136, 548 Levine, A.M., et al. 1996, ApJ, 469, L33 Makishima, K., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, 585 Marshall, H.L., Schulz, N.S., Fang, T., Cui, W., Canizares, C.R., Miller, J.M., & Lewin, W.H.G. 2001, in X-ray Emission from Accretion onto Black Holes, ed. T. Yaqoob, & J.H. Krolik (Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ.), 45 Mauche, C.W., Liedahl, D.A., & Fournier, K.B. 2003, ApJ, 588, L101 Mauche, C.W., Liedahl, D.A., & Fournier, K.B. 2005, in AIP Conf. Ser. 774, X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas: Theory, Experiment, and Observation, ed. R. Smith (New York: AIP), 133 McConnell, M.L., et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 984 Merloni, A., Fabian, A.C., & Ross, R.R. 2000, MNRAS, 313, 193 Mewe, R., & Schrijver, J. 1978, A&A, 65, 99 Mihalas, D. 1978, Stellar atmospheres (San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman) Miller, J.M., et al. 2002, ApJ, 578, 348 Miller, J.M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 620, 398 Murdin, P., & Webster, B.L. 1971, Nature, 233, 110 Ninkov, Z., Walker, G.A.H., & Yang, S. 1987a, ApJ, 321, 425 Ninkov, Z., Walker, G.A.H., & Yang, S. 1987b ApJ, 321, 438 Nowak, M.A., et al. 1999, ApJ, 510, 874 Nowak, M.A., et al. 2008, ApJ, in press (arXiv: 0809.3005) Oskinova, L.M., Hamann, W.-R., & Feldmeier, A. 2007, A&A, 476, 1331 Porquet, D., & Dubau, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 495 Pottschmidt, K., el al. 2000, A&A, 357, L17 Pottschmidt, K., et al. 2003, A&A, 407, 1039 Poutanen, J., Zdziarski, A.A., & Ibragimov, A. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1427 Remillard, R.A., & McClintock, J.E. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 49 Russell, D.M., Fender, R.P., Gallo, E., & Kaiser, C.R. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1341 Schulz, N.S., et al. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1141 Shaposhnikov, N., & Titarchuk, L. 2007, ApJ, 663, 445 Shimura, T., & Takahara, F. 1995, ApJ, 445, 780 Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical processes in the interstellar medium (New York: Wiley-Interscience) Strömgren, B. 1939, ApJ, 89, 526 Szostek, A., & Zdziarski, A.A. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 793 Treves, A., et al. 1980, ApJ, 242, 1114 van Aken, P.A., & Liebscher, B. 2002, Phys. Chem. Miner., 29, 188 Verner, D.A., Verner, E.M., & Ferland, G.J. 1996, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 64, 1 Verner, D.A., & Yakovlev, D.G. 1995, A&AS, 109, 125 Verner, D.A., Yakovlev, D.G., Band, I.M., & Trzhaskovskaya, M.B. 1993, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 55, 233 Vrtilek, S.D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1248 Walborn, N.R. 1973, ApJ, 179, L123 Webster, B.L., & Murdin, P. 1972, Nature, 235, 37 Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914 Wilms, J., et al. 2006, A&A, 447, 245 Wojdowski, P.S., Liedahl, D.A., & Kallman, T.R. 2008, ApJ, 673, 1023 Xiang, J., Zhang, S.N., & Yao, Y. 2005, ApJ, 628, 769 Zhang, S.N., et al. 1997, ApJ, 477, L95 Ziółkowski, J. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 851
astro-ph/9506102	1	9506	1995-06-20T13:17:35	Gravitational Lensing and Anisotropies of CBR on the Small Angular Scales	[ "astro-ph" ]	We investigate the effect of gravitational lensing, produced by linear density perturbations, for anisotropies of the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) on scales of arcminutes. In calculations, a flat universe ($\Omega=1$) and the Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum ($n=1$) are assumed. The numerical results show that on scales of a few arcminutes, gravitational lensing produces only negligible anisotropies in the temperature of the CBR. Our conclusion disagrees with that of Cay\'{o}n {\it et al.} who argue that the amplification of $\Delta T/T$ on scales $\le 3'$ may even be larger than 100\%.	astro-ph	astro-ph	GRAVITATIONAL LENSING AND ANISOTROPIES OF CBR ON THE SMALL ANGULAR SCALES J.M. Liu J.G. Gao a b International School for Advanced Studies(SISSA), Via Beirut n.-, Trieste Italy a b I.C.R.A., Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit(cid:19)a \La Sapienza", Piazzale Aldo Moro, - Roma Italy Accepted for Publication in: MNRAS We investigate the e(cid:11)ect of gravitational lensing, produced by linear density per- turbations, for anisotropies of the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) on scales of arcminutes. In calculations, a (cid:13)at universe ((cid:10) = ) and the Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum (n = ) are assumed. The numerical results show that on scales of a few arcminutes, gravitational lensing produces only negligible anisotropies in the tem- perature of the CBR. Our conclusion disagrees with that of Cay(cid:19)on et al. who argue that the ampli(cid:12)cation of (cid:1)T =T on scales (cid:20) may even be larger than %. Key words:cosmology - gravitational lensing - anisotropy on CBR. I. INTRODUCTION Many authors have computed the e(cid:11)ect of gravitational lensing for anisotropies of the CBR (Blanchard & Schneider ; Kashlinsky ; Cole & Efstathiou ; Tomita & Watanabe ; Linder ; Watanabe & Tomita ; Feng & Liu. ; Cay(cid:19)on et al. ). Unfortunately, however, their conclusions are controversial. Roughly speaking, there exist three di(cid:11)erent kinds of conclusion so far. The (cid:12)rst is that gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ects strongly erase (cid:13)uctuations of the CBR on scales of a few arcminutes (Kashlinsky ); the second is that an appreciable, even strong, ampli(cid:12)cation of (cid:1)T =T is possible (Sasaki ; Linder ; Cay(cid:19)on et al. ); the last is that gravitational lens e(cid:11)ects on the CBR are negligible (Cole & Efstathiou ; Tomita & Watanabe ). Recently, Cay(cid:19)on et al. presented calculations of the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ects, pro- duced by linear density (cid:13)uctuations on the CBR and got an interesting result. Their work implied that there should be an appreciable ampli(cid:12)cation, of the order of %, for (cid:1)T =T in present experiments on the scales of several arcminutes, whereas previous work including the e(cid:11)ect of nonlinear density (cid:13)uctuations found a negligible ampli(cid:12)cation (Cole & Efstathiou ). This implies that the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect on anisotropies of the CBR due to linear density (cid:13)uctuations overwhelms that due to nonlinear clustering. This result is surprising and di(cid:14)cult to interpret. In this paper, we use a new formalism to calculate the e(cid:11)ect of gravitational lensing on anisotropies of the CBR produced by linear density (cid:13)uctuations. Our calculations show that the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect on scales of a few arcminutes is essentially negligible in contrast with the results of Cay(cid:19)on et al. Within the geometrical optics approximation, a gravitational (cid:12)eld is equivalent to an optical medium with a refractive index di(cid:11)erent from unity, and the de(cid:13)ection of light may be interpreted in terms of the refractive index and its spatial variation. The amplitude and phase (cid:13)uctuations, produced by a random gravitational (cid:12)eld, may then be calculated using the usual methods of random medium optics (Fang ). In Sec.II, we establish the basic equations for a wave scattered by a gravitational potential and for the amplitude of the scattered wave. In Sec.III, we present the explicit formulae for calculating the anisotropies of the CBR. Numerical results and brief conclusions are summarized in Sec.IV. II. THE BASIC METHOD Under some reasonable assumptions (Cole & Efstathiou ), one can prove that there exists a gauge such that the metric perturbations are characterized by a single potential (cid:30)(t; x) (cid:28) i j ds = (cid:0)( + (cid:30))dt + ( (cid:0) (cid:30))a (t)(cid:14) dx dx ; () ij where a(t) is the scale factor of the universe. The relationship between the gravitational potential (cid:30) and the matter density perturbation (cid:14)(cid:26) is with (cid:25)G = c = (cid:1)(cid:30) = a (cid:26) (cid:14)(cid:26): () b In the background universe for the linear perturbation (which we assume to have (cid:10) = ), (cid:30) is time-independent. For the sake of simplicity in writing the Maxwell equations in a perturbed metric, we use the conformal time (cid:28) = t instead of t. Then p = i j ds = (cid:0) ( + (cid:30))(cid:28) d(cid:28) + ( (cid:0) (cid:30))(cid:28) (cid:14) dx dx : () ij The speed of light in the metric of Eq.() is set to unity. A fundamental problem for treating light propagating in an inhomogeneous universe is that of how to describe the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect. According to geometrical optics, a gravitational (cid:12)eld is equivalent to a medium with a refractive index di(cid:11)erent from unity and the de(cid:13)ection of light may be interpreted in terms of the refractive index and its spatial variation. As a simple version of this analogue, consider the spatial part of the photon four-momentum k = to be directed along the d(cid:21) (cid:22) dx (cid:22) x axis; one then has the following geodesic equation: i @ (cid:30) dk = (cid:0) dx ; i = ; : () i @ x On the other hand, the change in the direction of a light ray propagating in an inhomoge- neous medium with refractive index n = + n is @ n i dk = dx ; i = ; : () i @ x By comparing of Eqs.() and (), it is obvious that the e(cid:11)ect of the perturbed gravitational (cid:12)eld is equivalent to a change in the refractive index, i.e. n = (cid:0)(cid:30): () Therefore, considering the equivalence of the two descriptions of light propagating in an inhomogeneous matter distribution and in a medium with inhomogeneous refractive index, the Maxwell equations may be written in the following form @E @ (cid:28) = ( + (cid:30)) (cid:2)H; () @H @ (cid:28) = (cid:0)( + (cid:30)) (cid:2)E: () Formally, adopting Hanni's approach (Hanni ), the Maxwell equations in an universe with an inhomogeneous matter distribution may be obtained in more rigorous way. The propagation of an electromagnetic wave in a random inhomogeneous medium is accompanied by a number of (cid:13)uctuation phenomena including polarization, (cid:13)uctuation of phase and (cid:13)uctuation of amplitude. In the present paper, we concentrate on (cid:13)uctuation of amplitude. In a (cid:13)at universe, because the gravitational potential is time-independent, we can derive a solution of the Maxwell equations () and () representing monochromatic waves with (cid:12)xed frequency ! . In other words, we can assume that the electric and magnetic (cid:12)elds have the form Re(Ee ) and Re(He ) respectively. In the case of (cid:21) = (cid:25)! (cid:28) l , (l is the (cid:0)i!(cid:28) (cid:0)i!(cid:28) (cid:0) typical length-scale of inhomogeneity for matter in the universe), keeping only (cid:12)rst order terms, the wave equation can be simpli(cid:12)ed as (Feng and Liu ) ( + ! )E = (cid:0)! (cid:30)E : ( ) To solve the equation of wave scattering, in the case of weak (cid:13)uctuations, we apply the Born approximation to expand E in the series E = E + E + E + (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) () with E (cid:29) E (cid:29) E (cid:29) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1). Putting Eq.() into Eq.( ), we get two (cid:12)rst-order equations: ( + ! )E = ; () ( + ! )E = (cid:0)! (cid:30)E : () If the CBR is perfectly uniformly distributed, there is no net gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect on anisotropies of the CBR. This is a well-known result in geometrical optics and will be con(cid:12)rmed below from the point of view of wave scattering. In order to study the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect on anisotropies of the CBR, we focus on how the (cid:13)uctuation part of the CBR is a(cid:11)ected. To do so, we separate E into a homogeneous part E and a (cid:13)uctuation part h E f with E = E + E () h f E =< E >; E = E (cid:0) < E > : () h h f f Here, the averaging is done over all observation directions. As E and E propagate h f in an inhomogeneous universe, they interact with the gravitational potential and produce scattered waves E and E respectively. E and E and their scattering terms satisfy h f h f following equations ( + ! )E = ; () h ( + ! )E = (cid:0)! (cid:30)E ; () h h ( + ! )E = ; () f ( + ! )E = (cid:0)! (cid:30)E : () f f After scattering, the outgoing wave is E = E + E = E + E + E + E : ( ) h f h f Because the last scattering surface is far away from us, without loss of generality, we let the incident waves have the plane wave forms, E = A e and E = A e . The scattered h h f f i!(cid:1)x i!(cid:1)x waves can then be easily expressed, using Green's function method, in the following forms Z i(!x(cid:0)!(cid:1)x) ! e E (^x ) = A h h ( x)(cid:30)(x) ^ d x; () (cid:25) x Z i(!x(cid:0)!(cid:1)x) ! e E (^x ) = A ( x)(cid:30)(x) d x: () ^ f f (cid:25) x When Eqs.() and () are evaluated, it is su(cid:14)cient to include only the contribution due to waves scattered through angles not exceeding (cid:18) = (cid:28) : In other words, the integration (cid:21) l (cid:21) can be con(cid:12)ned to the part of space which lies within the cone C (d(cid:10)), (cid:18) (cid:20) , where (cid:18) is l the angle between the direction of observation and the direction of the scattering element, and l is the typical inhomogeneity scale in the universe. In fact, the integration functions of Eqs.() and () oscillate rapidly outside the cone C (d(cid:10)), so that for a su(cid:14)ciently smooth variation of (cid:30)(x), integration over the region external to cone C (d(cid:10)) only provides a negligible contribution. This cone C (d(cid:10)) is much smaller than the angular scale of CBR inhomogeneities and so we have E (^x ) = A (^x ) (cid:30)(x) d x; () h h (cid:25) x Z i(!x(cid:0)!(cid:1)x) ! e E (^x ) = A (^x ) (cid:30)(x) d x; () f f (cid:25) x Z i(!x(cid:0)!(cid:1)x) ! e A (^x ) is the amplitude of the uniform part of the CBR and A (^x ) is that of the (cid:13)uc- h f tuation part; as a direct consequence, E (^x ) is independent of observation direction, but h E (^x ) does depend on the observation direction. f III. ANGULAR CORRELATION FUNCTION In the Rayleigh-Jeans part of blockbody radiation spectrum, T / I (where T and I are temperature and intensity of the CBR respectively) and I / A (where A is the amplitude of the electric vector E). We will not distinguish A and E in the following except when necessary. We then have (cid:14)T (cid:14)E E (cid:0) hE i = = () T E E Putting Eq.( ) into Eq.() and using the de(cid:12)nitions of E and E , we have h f (cid:14)E E + E (cid:0) hE i + E (cid:0) hE i f h h f f = : () E E h It is obvious from Eqs.() and () that E (cid:0) hE i = and hE i = . Without loss of h h f generality, we let E = and then the above equation simpli(cid:12)es to h (cid:14)E E = E + E : () f f Considering the above relations, the angular correlation function of anisotropy of tempera- ture of the CBR may be obtained D E (cid:14)T (^x ) (cid:14)T (^x ) C ((cid:11)) = (cid:1) ; () T T where cos((cid:11)) = ^x (cid:1) ^x and the averaging is done over all observation directions. Substituting Eq.() into Eq.(), it follows that C ((cid:11)) = hj E (^x ) j i + hj E (^x )E (^x ) ji + hj E (^x ) j i: () f f f f In the right-hand side of Eq.(), the (cid:12)rst term is the angular correlation function of the primordial (cid:13)uctuation background; the second describes the interaction between the gravita- tional lensing e(cid:11)ect and the perturbed part of the primordial background (this is called the angular cross correlation function C ((cid:11)), and determines the lensing e(cid:11)ects on the anisotropy c of the primordial CBR); the last is a higher order term and may reasonably be omitted. The ma jor purpose of this paper is to determine the angular cross correlation function C ((cid:11)). c We Fourier decompose the gravitational potential, obtaining Z ik(cid:1)x (cid:30)(x) = (cid:1) e d k: ( ) ((cid:25) ) k Based on linear perturbation theory and assuming a Gaussian random (cid:13)uctuation (cid:12)eld, we have (cid:0) (cid:1) = H k (cid:14) ; () k k h(cid:14) (cid:14) i =j (cid:14) j (cid:14) (k (cid:0) k ); () k k k h(cid:1) (cid:1) i = H k j (cid:14) j (cid:14) (k (cid:0) k ); () k k k (cid:0) (cid:0) h(cid:14) (cid:1) i = H k j (cid:14) j (cid:14) (k (cid:0) k ); () k k k where j (cid:14) j and j (cid:1) j are the spectra of perturbations of the density and gravitational k k potential respectively. Roughly speaking, for adiabatic perturbations, the temperature (cid:13)uctuation of the CBR on scales of a few arcminutes is (cid:14)T =T = (=)(cid:14)(cid:26)=(cid:26) before the recombination era (Silk ). What are the amplitude and shape of the temperature (cid:13)uctuations after decoupling? Of course, this depends very much on the assumed recombination history. For the sake of simplicity, we assume that the time-scale of recombination is extremely short so that (cid:14)T =T = (=)(cid:14)(cid:26)=(cid:26) remains with the previous amplitude and shape. This assumption is rea- sonable for our purposes since we are dealing with wave propagation and its interaction with gravitational lensing between the last scattering surface and the observer. Our assumption, in fact, just means choosing a convenient initial condition. Fourier decomposing the (cid:13)uctuation part of the CBR and its scattering term, we obtain Z ik(cid:1)x E (^x ) = (cid:14) e d k; () f k ((cid:25) ) Z Z Z ! E (^x ) = (cid:14) (cid:1) e e cos(!x (cid:0) ! (cid:1) x)d xd k d k ; () f k k ik (cid:1)x ik (cid:1)x ((cid:25) ) where the vector x points to the last scattering surface and has length H ; the unit (cid:0) vector ^x represents the direction of observation. For mathematical convenience, it is suitable to use a spherical harmonic analysis, which is widely used when dealing with anisotropies on large angular scales: m=+l X X E ( ^ x ) = A Y ((cid:10)); () f lm lm l= m=(cid:0)l m=+l X X E ( ^ x ) = a Y ((cid:10)); () f lm lm l= m=(cid:0)l and Z ? A = E ( x )Y ((cid:10))d(cid:10); ^ () lm f lm Z ? a = E ( x )Y ((cid:10))d(cid:10): ^ ( ) lm f lm Substituting Eqs.() and () into Eqs.() and ( ) respectively and using the Rayleigh equation ik(cid:1)x ikx cos (cid:13) l l= X e = e = i (l + )j (kx)P (cos (cid:13) ) () l l l= and the addition expression (cid:25) m=+l X ? P (cos(cid:13) ) = Y ((cid:10) )Y ((cid:10)); () l lm k lm l + m=(cid:0)l where j and P are the l-th spherical Bessel function and the l-th Legendre function respec- l l tively, we obtain the following equations: Z l i (cid:0) A = (cid:14) j (kH )Y ((cid:10) )d k; () lm k l lm k (cid:25) l Z Z Z i ! (cid:0) a = (cid:14) (cid:1) j (k H )j (k x)Y ((cid:10) )Y ((cid:10) ) lm k k l l lm k lm k (cid:25) cos(!x (cid:0) ! (cid:1) x) d xd k d k : () x According to random (cid:12)eld theory, for a Gaussian random (cid:12)eld, we have h(cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:14) i = j (cid:14) j j (cid:14) j (cid:14) (k (cid:0) k )(cid:14) (k (cid:0) k )+ j (cid:14) j j (cid:14) j (cid:14) (k (cid:0) k )(cid:14) (k (cid:0) k ) k k k k k k k k + j (cid:14) j j (cid:14) j (cid:14) (k (cid:0) k )(cid:14) (k (cid:0) k ): () k k Combining the above expansions and integrating for angular coordinates within the cone C (d(cid:10)), we (cid:12)nally obtain ? <j a j> = <j a A j> lm lm lm (cid:0) H Z Z H (cid:0) = f[ j (cid:14) j j (kH )j (kx)xdxdk ] k l l (cid:25) l (cid:0) (cid:0) H H Z Z Z Z + j (cid:14) j j (cid:14) j j (k H )j (k x )j (k x )x x dx dx dk dk g; () k k l l l (cid:0) where the averaging is done over the entire sky and over all observation positions in the universe. Finally, the angular cross correlation function, generated by interaction between the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect and the primordial perturbed part of the CBR, is as follows: X C ((cid:11)) = (l + ) <j a j > P ((cid:11)): () c lm l (cid:25) l= For a double beam switch experiment, the observable (cid:14)T ((cid:11))=T , produced by gravitational lensing, is X (cid:14)T ((cid:11))=T = (l + ) <j a j > ( (cid:0) P ((cid:11))): () lm l (cid:25) l= IV. NUMERICAL RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We assume that the (cid:13)uctuation spectrum is the Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum when cal- culating the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect on anisotropies of the CBR. For comparison with observation, an appropriate normalization is necessary. We use the rms mass (cid:13)uctuation ((cid:14)M=M ) = within a sphere of radius r = h M pc as the normalization condition. Of (cid:0) course, how to select normalization conditions depends somewhat on how the mass distri- bution traces the galaxy distribution. At present, this is not clear and so the selection of the normalization condition may produce an uncertainty in the numerical results. However, this does not signi(cid:12)cantly a(cid:11)ect our conclusion. With the above normalization condition, the normalized power spectrum is given by j (cid:14) j = r k () k In order to cancel the unknown nonlinear e(cid:11)ect, we need to apply a low-pass (cid:12)lter function to truncate the spectrum. For mathematical convenience, we choose this as an exponential form e . Thus, for making calculations, the power spectrum is replaced by (cid:0)kr t (cid:0)kr t j (cid:14) j = r ke : ( ) k Here r is a cut-o(cid:11) scale. Integrating Eq.() over k, we obtain t t (H r ) r H r + H + x (cid:0) ha i = ( ) f[ Q ( dx] + lm l (cid:0) (cid:25) l H x) (cid:0) H Z (cid:0) (cid:0) H H Z Z H + r H r + x + x t t Q ( ) Q ( dx dx g () l l x x ) with R j (cid:14) j d k k k l = = r ; () t R j (cid:14) j d k k where Q is the second kind of Legendre function. We have integrated Eq.() numerically l in the case of r = h M pc, r = h M pc and h = :. The behavior of the multipoles as t (cid:0) (cid:0) a function of the harmonic number l is showed in Fig.. The predicted cross function of the temperature (cid:13)uctuation of the CBR due to the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect for comparison with double beam switch experiments is showed in Fig.. We have also made numerical calculations varying the parameters r , r and h within acceptable regions. However, the t numerical results are not sensitive to changes of these parameters. From Fig., it is obvious that the e(cid:11)ect of gravitatioal lensing on anisotropies of temperature of the CBR on the scale of arcminutes are too small to signi(cid:12)cantly amplify or depress the primordial anisotropies of the CBR. We can then safely conclude that the gravitational lensing e(cid:11)ect on anisotropies of temperature of the CBR on scales of a few arcminutes are negligible. Our conclusion disagrees strongly with that of Cayon et al. who argue that gravitational lensing, produced by linear density perturbations, may enhances (cid:1)T =T by (cid:24) % or even more. In addition, the problem in the calculation presented by Cay(cid:19)on et al. ( ) could be that they considered the e(cid:11)ect on the anisotropies of the CBR caused only by de(cid:13)ections of light lines, but not by convergences and divergences of light beams. In principle, the last e(cid:11)ect could also produce a considerable change in the (cid:13)uctuation of the intensity of the CBR compared with that caused by de(cid:13)ections of light lines. Acknowledgements. We thank the anonymous referee for his enlightening comments which resulted in im- portant improvements of the paper. We appreciate Prof. J.Miller for his carefully reading our manuscript which improved its readability. J.M.L. is grateful to Dr. L.To(cid:11)olatti, Dr. P.Mazzei, Dr. N.Di.Cicco and especially to Prof. G.De Zotti and Prof. L.Danese for their hospitality during his stay in Padova. He also acknowledges (cid:12)nancial support from SISSA and from the Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova where part of this work was done. REFERENCES [] Blanchard,a.,& Schneider,J. , A&A, , [] Cay(cid:19)on,L., Gonz(cid:19)alez,M.E.& Sanz,L.J. , ApJ, , [] Cole,S.& Efstathiou,G., , MNRAS, , [] Fang,L.Z., , Scientia Sinica, A, [] Feng,L.L.& Liu,J.M., , A&A, , [] Gaier,T., et al., , ApJ, , L [] Hanni,R.S., , Phys.Rev., , [] Holtzman,J.A., , ApJ.Supp., , [ ] Kashlinsky,A., , ApJ, , L [] Linder,E.V., , MNRAS, , [] Readhead,A.C.S., Lawrence,C.R., Myers,S.T., Sargent,W.L.W. & Mo(cid:11)et,A.T., , ApJ, , [] Sasaki,M., , MNRAS, , [] Silk,J., , Nature, , [] Tomita,K.& Watanabe,K., , Prog.Theor.Phys., , [] Uson,J.M.& Wilkinson,D.T., , ApJ, , L [] Watanabe,K.& Tomita,K., , ApJ, ,
astro-ph/0605272	1	0605	2006-05-10T20:04:05	High-Resolution Infrared Imaging of Herschel 36 SE: A Showcase for the Influence of Massive Stars in Cluster Environments	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present high-resolution infrared imaging of the massive star-forming region around the O-star Herschel 36. Special emphasis is given to a compact infrared source at 0".25 southeast of the star. The infrared source, hereafter Her 36 SE, is extended in the broad-band images, but features spatially unresolved Br gamma line emission. The line-emission source coincides in position with the previous HST detections in H alpha and the 2 cm radio continuum emission detected by VLA interferometry. We propose that the infrared source Her 36 SE harbors an early B-type star, deeply embedded in a dusty cloud. The fan shape of the cloud with Herschel 36 at its apex, though, manifests direct and ongoing destructive influence of the O7V star on Her 36 SE.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version August 21, 2017 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 6/22/04 6 0 0 2 y a M 0 1 1 v 2 7 2 5 0 6 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a A SHOWCASE FOR THE INFLUENCE OF MASSIVE STARS IN CLUSTER ENVIRONMENTS 1,2 HIGH-RESOLUTION INFRARED IMAGING OF HERSCHEL 36 SE: M. Goto,3 B. Stecklum,4 H. Linz,3,4 M. Feldt,3 Th. Henning,3 I. Pascucci,3,5, T. Usuda6 Draft version August 21, 2017 ABSTRACT We present high-resolution infrared imaging of the massive star-forming region around the O-star Herschel 36. Special emphasis is given to a compact infrared source at 0.′′25 southeast of the star. The infrared source, hereafter Her 36 SE, is extended in the broad–band images, but features spatially unresolved Br γ line emission. The line-emission source coincides in position with the previous HST detections in H α and the 2 cm radio continuum emission detected by VLA interferometry. We propose that the infrared source Her 36 SE harbors an early B-type star, deeply embedded in a dusty cloud. The fan shape of the cloud with Herschel 36 at its apex, though, manifests direct and ongoing destructive influence of the O7V star on Her 36 SE. Subject headings: circumstellar matter - dust, extinction - planetary systems: protoplanetary disks - early-type - stars: formation - stars: individual (Herschel 36, G5.97−1.17) 1. INTRODUCTION Massive stars are the primary source of radiation, ki- netic energy, and chemical enrichment in the interstel- lar medium, playing a pivotal role in galactic evolution. Because of their remote locations, our understanding of their formation has been limited by the lack of high resolution techniques. This challenge has been under- taken by adaptive optics systems at large-aperture tele- scopes. The present work is part of a coordinated effort to understand the formation of high-mass stars by us- ing state-of-the-art instruments available at the VLT and other telescopes (Feldt et al. 1999; Henning et al. 2001; Feldt et al. 2003; Grady et al. 2004; Pascucci et al. 2004; Puga et al. 2004; Linz et al. 2005; Apai et al. 2005). 1997; but see also Arias et al. Herschel 36 is located in a high-mass star-forming re- gion at a distance of 1.8 kpc from us (van den Anker et al. 2006) near the center of M 8. The bright central part of M 8 is called the Hourglass. The Hourglass is a cavity of ion- ized gas seen through the gaps between the foreground obscuration (Woodward et al. 1986). Herschel 36, an O7V star (Woolf 1961), is responsible for the ioniza- tion of the gas in the cavity. The inferred dynamical age of the ionized gas and, therefore, the age of the Hourglass and Herschel 36, is as small as ∼5×104 yrs (Chakraborty & Anandarao 1997). In the present study a special focus is placed on the infrared source found at a distance of 0.′′25 southeast of Herschel 36. The extended source called hereafter Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Based on data collected in the course of NACO and MIDI guar- anteed time observations (71.C-0143(A) and 73.C-0175(A)) at the VLT on Cerro Paranal (Chile), which is operated by the European Southern Observatory (ESO). 2 Based on data collected at Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. 3 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Konigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany. 4 Thuringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Sternwarte 5, D- 07778 Tautenburg, Germany. 5 The University of Arizona, Department of Astronomy/Steward Observatory, 993 N Cherry Ave. Tucson, AZ 85721-0065. 6 Subaru Telescope, 650, North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720. Her 36 SE was first recognized by Stecklum et al. (1995) by means of lunar occultation measurements. Her- schel 36 had long been known as a peculiar early-type star with substantial mid-infrared excess (Woolf 1973; Allen 1986). It is only after Her 36 SE was spatially resolved that we know that this object is actually the source responsible for the excess infrared emission. Af- ter the discovery of Stecklum et al. (1995), the possible identity of Her 36 SE has been discussed, including an externally ionized protoplanetary disk, or, a proplyd, an obscured embedded source, and a leftover circumstellar disk of Herschel 36; however, no solid conclusion was reached. In the next section, the observations at the VLT and supplemental spectroscopy at the Subaru Telescope are described. The direct consequences of the observations are summarized in §3. In §4 we will further discuss the possible nature of Her 36 SE as a deeply embedded early- type star under the violent influence of the nearby O-star Herschel 36. 2. OBSERVATION AND DATA REDUCTION 2.1. Thermal Near-infrared Imaging The infrared imaging at L′ (3.8 µm) and M ′ (4.7 µm) was carried out at the VLT UT4 on 2003 June 11 with the adaptive optics imager NACO (Rousset et al. 2000; Lenzen et al. 2003; Hartung et al. 2003). Herschel 36 (V = 9.1 mag) served as a wavefront reference source for the visible wavefront sensor in the adaptive optics system. A short exposure of 180 ms was repeated 27 times in the L′ imaging at each of the 9 positions of the telescope dithering. Imaging at M ′ was performed the same way, but with a shorter integration time of 56 ms repeated 89 times. The total on-source integration time is 58 s and 60 s at L′ and M ′, respectively. The observing log is presented in Table 1 including imaging with other filters and additional spectroscopy. The imaging data were reduced in the standard man- ner. After sky-subtraction and flat-fielding, images were registered referring to the position of Herschel 36. The size of the isoplanatic patch was measured using more than 40 stars inside the entire field of view of 2 Goto et al. posite image of L′, M ′ and the narrow-band image at 2.17 µm described in the next section is shown in Fig- ure 1. 2.2. Narrow-band Imaging at Br γ Narrow-band Br γ images (2.17 µm) were obtained during the same night together with continuum images at 2.18 µm. Short exposures of 1 s were repeated 20 times to minimize the saturation of bright stars. The total integration time on source is 100 s. The sky at 30′′ distance from the field was recorded for background subtraction. The data were processed in the same way as it was the case for broadband imaging. Aperture pho- tometry was performed for Her 36 SE in Br γ and the continuum at 2.18 µm. Since Herschel 36 is saturated, Her 36 B was used to establish the correct flux scale of the images (K = 9.4 mag; KS1 in Woodward et al. 1990, 18006nr766 in Bik 2004). The PSF sampled from Her 36 B was scaled and subtracted from Herschel 36 to isolate the extended emission of Her 36 SE. The total pixel counts were summed up inside a circular aperture of 1.′′3 centered on Her 36 SE. Note that the Br γ photom- etry presented in Table 2 is before the continuum sub- traction. The accuracy of the photometry is ∼0.1 mag for the images with the underlying continuum emission. The continuum image was scaled and subtracted so that the pixel counts of blue stars (with respect to their in- frared colors) around Herschel 36 are equally canceled in the line-emission image. 2.3. Mid-infrared Imaging at 8.7 µm and 12.8 µm Fig. 2.- Left: MIDI source-acquisition images at 12.8 µm for Her 36 SE (top) and the flux calibration star HD 169916 (bot- tom). Herschel 36 is no longer visible at this wavelength. While HD 169916 has multiple diffraction rings around, Her 36 SE is ex- tended with no trace of a point source. Right: The radial profile of Her 36 SE and HD 169916. The size of the emitting region at Her 36 SE is 850 AU in diameter, after deconvolution with the spatial profile of HD 169916. Fig. 1.- Color composite image of Herschel 36. M ′ is color coded in red, L′ in green, and Br γ in blue before continuum subtraction. Her 36 SE is the red extended emission at 0.′′25 southeast of Her- schel 36. Her 36 B is an infrared star at 3.′′6 north of Herschel 36. The coordinates of Herschel 36 are R.A. (J2000) 18h03m40.s20, Dec (J2000) −24◦22′43.′′0 (Maiz-Apellaniz et al. 2004). NACO (27′′×27′′). The measurements have been done at 2.2 µm, since the isoplanatic patch becomes smaller with the wavelength. The point spread function (PSF) is found elongated only at the edge of the field of view, and no significant degradation of PSF is recognized within the field of view relevant to the following discussion shown in Figure 1. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of point sources are 0.′′11 at L′ and 0.′′13 at M ′ in the fully reduced images. The absolute flux calibration was tied to the photom- etry of Herschel 36 as given in the literature. The zero point magnitudes were calculated to be consistent with the photometric magnitudes L′ = 6.3 mag and M ′ = 3.8 mag in Woodward et al. (1990) and Woolf (1973), re- spectively. The images were convolved with Gaussian fil- ter at the zero-point calculation to match the spatial res- olution in the previous observations. The photometry of Herschel 36 was performed inside a small aperture of 0.′′2 to avoid confusion with Her 36 SE. An aperture correc- tion was applied by using the PSF sampled at Her 36 B (see Figure 1). The photometry of Her 36 SE was then performed in a circular aperture of 1.′′3, after the con- tribution of Herschel 36 was removed by subtracting the scaled PSF. The primary error source in the photometry is the spatial fluctuation of the background emission in the immediate vicinity of Herschel 36. We restored the flux compensation function with varying outer bounds from 0.′′6 to 1.′′4, and found that the amount of aper- ture correction does not differ more than 15 %. The sky level sampled at different locations at 0.′′9 to 2.′′6 around the object does not change the net photometry by more than 14 %. We therefore quote 0.2 mag as the photomet- ric accuracy, although the formal error is much smaller (<0.05 mag). The results are presented in Table 2 with other photometry obtained in this paper. The color com- Infrared Imaging of Herschel 36 SE 3 TABLE 1 UT Date Filter/Band λ [µm] ∆λa [µm] Telescope Instrument Observation Spectral Resolution 2003 Jun 11 2003 Jun 11 2003 Jun 11 2003 Jun 11 2004 Jun 3 2004 Jun 3 2004 Jul 29 aIn FWHM. L′ M ′ Br, γ IB 218 N8.7 [Ne II] Br α 3.80 4.78 2.17 2.18 8.64 12.8 4.05 0.62 0.59 0.023 0.060 1.55 0.39 VLT VLT VLT VLT VLT VLT Subaru NACO NACO NACO NACO MIDI MIDI IRCS/AO Imaging Imaging Imaging Imaging Imaging Imaging Spectroscopy R = 10, 000 Mid-infrared images in the N 1 filter (8.7 µm) and in the [Ne II] filter (12.8 µm) were obtained on 2004 June 3 at the VLT with MIDI (Leinert et al. 2003). The instru- ment is an interferometer/spectrometer, but was used as mid-infrared camera in the present observation. The tip- tilt corrector STRAP was used to stabilize the images. These thermal infrared data were recorded by using a chopping throw of 10′′. The total on-source integration is 80 s at 8.7 µm and 375 s at 12.8 µm. The data reduc- tion was carried out using the pipeline provided by the MIDI consortium7. The spatial resolution of the final image is nearly diffraction limited (Fig. 2). The emission from Her 36 SE is clearly extended both in N 1 and [Ne II]. Herschel 36 is no longer visible at mid-infrared wavelengths, as is expected from its pho- tospheric spectral energy distribution (SED). It is clear that the peculiar mid-infrared excess toward Herschel 36 (Dyck 1977) is not from the O-star itself, but is almost entirely attributed to Her 36 SE. The flux calibration was performed with respect to the photometric stan- dard HD 169916 for which the absolute flux density was taken from Cohen et al. (1999). The photometry was performed inside a 1.′′8 aperture centered on Her 36 SE. The size of the aperture is slightly larger than that is used in the shorter wavelengths. The smaller aperture at the thermal near-infrared is because there seem to be two overlapping emission contributions at Her 36 SE; the compact dusty cloud at Her 36 SE itself, and the filamentary emission more connected to the diffuse emis- sion at 2′′ southeast of Herschel 36. Since we will discuss an internal source inside Her 36 SE below, the diffuse emission should be excluded not to overestimate its lu- minosity. On the other hand, the mid-infrared images by MIDI do not show any clear hints of multiple sources, we therefore use a safe oversized aperture not to lose the mid-infrared flux of Her 36 SE for later discussion of its energetics. 2.4. Medium-Resolution Br α Spectroscopy Supplemental 4-micron spectroscopy (R = 10,000) was performed at the Subaru Telescope on 29 July 2004 with IRCS (Tokunaga et al. 1998; Kobayashi et al. 2000). The slit was oriented along a position angle of 110◦ counted from north to east to cover Herschel 36 and SE at the same time. An adaptive optics system was used to attain higher spatial resolution (Gaessler et al. 2002; Takami et al. 2004). The sky at 2′ north of Her- schel 36 was observed for background subtraction after Fig. 3.- (a) Continuum-subtracted Br γ image of Her 36 SE. The location of the point source is marked by ticks. The gray contour is from the narrow-band continuum image at 2.18 µm presented darker at around Herschel 36 for clarity. No point source is detected at the continuum wavelength. (b) The H α image retrieved from the HST archive. The PSF generated by TinyTim is subtracted. The contour in black is radio continuum emission at 2 cm obtained with the VLA (see Stecklum et al. 1998 for observational detail). The unresolved sources at Br γ, H α, and radio wavelengths are all in positional agreement. The coordinate offsets are with respect to Herschel 36. 7 http://www.mpia-hd.mpg.de/MIDISOFT/ each on-source integration. The spectroscopic flat field 4 Goto et al. Fig. 4.- Left: A close-up view of the two–dimensional spectrogram near the Br α emission. The continuum emission at Her 36 SE is clearly separated from that of Herschel 36, and apparently extended (position A and C). The line emission from the ambient nebulosity is seen at Br α (position B). The white line traces the wavelength centroids of the Br α emission along the slit. The emission line is slightly (∼2 km s−1) blueshifted at Her 36 SE with respect to the ambient nebular emission. Right: Cross-cuts of the spectrogram along the slit, at the continuum (A and C; gray polygon), and the Br α emission (B; thin solid line). The contribution of the nebulosity is subtracted at the position B. Her 36 SE shows a sharp emission line at Br α on top of the extended continuum emission. The line emission profile, after subtracting the continuum profile, is close to that of Herschel 36, which means that the Br α emission at Her 36 SE is also compact and point-like. was obtained from a halogen lamp exposure at the end of the night. One dimensional spectra of Herschel 36 and SE were extracted with the aperture-extraction package of IRAF8 after the sky-subtraction, flat-fielding, and the interpo- lation of the bad pixels were applied. The wavelength calibration was carried out using the atmospheric trans- mission curve modeled by ATRAN (Lord 1992). The Br α line-emission was calibrated to the photometry of Herschel 36 at L′. First, to correct the continuum slope, the one-dimensional spectrum of Herschel 36 was divided by the spectroscopic standard star HR 7121 (B2.5V), and was multiplied by a blackbody spectrum of the tem- perature corresponding to the effective temperature of a B2.5V star (Teff =19,000 K; Crowther 2005). The spec- trum with correct slope was then scaled so that the aver- aged flux density inside the L′ bandpath (3.49–4.11 µm) is equal to the L′-band photometry of Herschel 36. The same conversion factor was used to calibrate the spectral flux of Her 36 SE reduced in the same way with Her- schel 36. The Br α luminosity at Her 36 SE is found to be L(Br α) =(1.4–1.6)×1024 W at the distance of 1.8 kpc, after the continuum and the surrounding diffuse emission is subtracted. The error interval is given by the difference of the two sequential measurements, although it is subject to the uncounted uncertainty associated to the possible vignetting by the narrow slit of 0.′′3. 3. RESULTS 8 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Ob- servatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. An unresolved source is detected at the location of Her 36 SE in the continuum-subtracted image at Br γ (Fig. 3). The diameter of the point-like source is less than 130 AU from the diffraction-limited spatial resolution of NACO (0.′′072 in FWHM at 2.17 µm). The HST/PC2 image retrieved from the ST-ECF9 archive shows a com- pact H α emission at the same location (Fig. 3). The H α emission is unresolved as well. Considering the plate scale of PC2 (0.′′046 pixel−1), this finding indicates that the source is less than 100 AU across. Furthermore, ra- dio interferometric observations have been carried out with the VLA at a wavelength of 2 cm (see Stecklum et al. 1998 for the observational detail). A compact radio source is found at the same location as the position of the Br γ and H α emission. The radio source is unresolved with regard to the synthesized beam size of 0.′′16, which translates to 290 AU. Another line of evidence for a point-like source comes from the spectroscopy. The two-dimensional spectro- gram near Br α is shown in Figure 4. Her 36 SE shows distinct line emission in Br α, slightly blueshifted from ambient nebular emission by 2 km s−1, with a spatial profile apparently narrower than the continuum emission. The sharp spatial profile is comparable to that of Her- schel 36, which corroborates the presence of a point-like source in the hydrogen line emission at the location of Her 36 SE. On the other hand, Her 36 SE is clearly extended in 9 The Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility (ST- ECF), jointly operated by ESA and the European Southern Ob- servatory (ESO), is the European HST science facility, supporting the European astronomy community in exploiting the research op- portunities provided by the Hubble Space Telescope. Infrared Imaging of Herschel 36 SE 5 the continuum emission at wavelengths from 2 to 13 µm. If we use the spatial profile of HD 169916 as the in- strumental PSF, and deconvolve Her 36 SE by inverting simple square sum, the extent of the emitting source at Her 36 SE is reduced to 0.′′47 at 12.8 µm, which is 850 AU in diameter at the distance of the object (Fig. 2). The SED of Her 36 SE is presented in Figure 5 to character- ize the extended emission. The color temperature of the continuum source clearly points to the existence of warm dust at the location of Her 36 SE. No point–like substruc- ture is found in the broad–band images of Her 36 SE that could have corresponded to the unresolved line emission. 4. DISCUSSION – NATURE OF HERSCHEL 36 SE Here we first discuss the identity of the line emission source and its possible ionization mechanism, including external ionization by Herschel 36, an embedded low- to intermediate-mass star in its active accretion phase, and an H II region internally ionized by an early-type star. The Br γ emission is apparently inside the dusty cloud at Her 36 SE, since it is spatially more confined than the continuum emission. In addition, there is no hint of rim-ionization detected in Br γ emission at the side of Her 36 SE where it faces toward Herschel 36. We found no solid evidence that Herschel 36 plays a direct role to externally ionize the unresolved source inside Her 36 SE. The radio flux at 2 cm (Fν =1.3 mJy) is probably too high for an accretion signature of an intermediate-mass star at 1.8 kpc away. Neufeld & Hollenbach (1996) have calculated the free-free emission arising from an accretion shock in dependence of (proto)stellar mass and accretion rate. However, even with their most extreme setup (M Macc = 10−4M⊙yr−1) they just reach a 3.6 cm = 10 M⊙, flux of roughly 3 mJy for a source 100 pc away. Extrap- olated to λ = 2 cm (by optimistically assuming that the ionized gas is completely optically thick with Fν ∼ ν2) and scaled to a distance of 1.8 kpc, the expected 2-cm flux would be just some 30 µJy, around 40 times less than the measured value. It is therefore inferred that a star with an early spectral type exists inside Her 36 SE that gives rise to a small H II Fig. 5.- The infrared SED of Herschel 36 and SE, plotted by the circles and the squares, respectively. The filled symbols are from the present observations, and the crosses and open symbols are from the literature. Note that this previous photometry has been done with much larger apertures. The color temperature of the dust emission measures 400 K from 3–13 µm photometry, which is taken as the upper limit of the dust emission temperature of Her 36 SE. region responsible for the radio emission. The H II region is internally ionized, but is kept compact because of the high density of the enshrouding cloud. If we take the VLA beam size as the physical dimension of the H II region (r ∼140 AU), the number of Lyman continuum photons required to maintain the ionized gas is 1.6×1045 s−1. The Lyman continuum photon-rate is reproducible only by a star earlier than B2 if the star is at the zero- age main sequence (Panagia 1973; Crowther 2005). On the other hand, in order not to create a parsec-scale H II region, the hydrogen density has to be as high as nH > 106 cm−3. We use the K-band extinction toward the hypotheti- cal early-type star to estimate whether the gas density is sufficiently high to confine the H II region. A B2 star at the zero-age main-sequence should have a relative K- band brightness of 9.9 mag at the distance of Herschel 36 without any attenuation ((V − K)0 = −0.9 mag from Ducati et al. 2001). The sensitivity of our observation at 2 µm is 15.7 mag for a 3 sigma detection at the loca- tion of Her 36 SE. With non-detection of any continuum point source at this wavelength, the dust extinction must be larger than 6 mag at 2 µm, which translates to AV > 60 mag after correcting AV ≈ 5 mag for the foreground extinction toward the Herschel 36 region (Stecklum et al. 1998). The visible extinction can be related to a hy- drogen column density (e.g., Mathis 1990; Ryter 1996). Provided that the dusty core of Her 36 SE is spherical, of constant density, and 850 AU across as is measured in the 12.8 µm image; the mass in the obscuration is MSE ≥ 1.7 × 10−2M⊙ with nH ≥ 1.8 × 107 cm−3. Thus, the gas density should be high enough to keep the H II region spatially unresolved. Lν/hν dν ≈ αB/αeff Br α · L(Br α)/hνBr α. The Lyman photon rate derived from Br α spec- troscopy is also consistent with that of an early B type star. The ionizing flux in an H II region is ob- tained from Br α line flux by scaling the photon number- count proportionally to the recombination coefficients, Rν0 If we take αeff Br α = 1.085 × 10−14cm3 s−1 and αB = 2.658 × 10−13cm3 s−1 from Storey & Hummer (1995) for the Case B of Te = 104 K and Ne = 107 cm−3, the Lyman continuum rate turns out (6.9–8.0) ×1044 s−1, which is reproducible by a B2.5 dwarf (Crowther 2005). The cor- rection of the foreground extinction needs caution, since the dust obscuration is increasingly transparent in the longer wavelength (Rieke & Lebofsky 1985); but if we use AK = 6 mag as a face value, the intrinsic Lyman continuum rate is (4.1–4.8) ×1045 s−1, which is still con- sistent with the ionizing photon rate of a B1–B1.5 dwarf. The infrared luminosity of Her 36 SE is consistent both with an internal B2 star, and also with external heating by Herschel 36. The infrared luminosity from 2 to 40 µm is calculated from the NACO and MIDI photometry with the flux density at the longer wavelength extrapolated as F (λ) = κ(λ) Md d−2 B(Td, λ); where d is the distance to the object, and κ(λ) is the computed mass absorption co- efficient for the grains without ice mantles coagulated in the protostellar cores (Ossenkopf & Henning 1994). The total infrared luminosity is LIR = 400 L⊙ at an assumed distance of 1.8 kpc insensitive to the gas density of the core n = 106 cm−3 to 108 cm−3. It is therefore well re- producible either by the luminosity of a B2 star at the 6 Goto et al. TABLE 2 Filter Fλ Br γ IB 218 L′ M ′ N8.7 Ne II Herschel 36 Her 36 SE a b [10−14 W m−2 µm−1] Fλ b [10−14 W m−2 µm−1] PSF in FWHM · · · · · · 5.1 5.2 · · · · · · 2.2 c 2.0 7.9 21 54 12 0.′′072 0.′′071 0.′′11 0.′′13 0.′′35 0.′′37 aThe photometric apertures are 1.′′3 in the mid-infrared bands (N8.7 and Ne II), and 1.′′8 in all the others. bThe photometric errors are typically 10% at 2.2 µm, and 20% at all the other filters. cContinuum is not subtracted. zero-age main-sequence (L∗ = 3 × 103 L⊙), or by Her- schel 36 (L∗ = 105 L⊙) while the solid angle subtended by Her 36 SE is of the order of unity at the location of Herschel 36. The dust emitting temperature is 400 K which should be taken as the upper limit, for the lack of additional photometry at the longer wavelengths. We conclude by comparing Her 36 SE with two sim- ilar cases reported to date in which bright mid-infrared sources are found in the immediate (projected) vicin- ity of O-type stars. The infrared source SC3 has been found at 1.′′8 (810 AU) west of θ1 Ori C, the pri- mary illumination source of the Orion Trapezium Clus- ter (Hayward, Houch, & Miles 1994). SC3 is spatially resolved, measuring 1.′′5 across, however, despite the apparent proximity to θ1 Ori C (O5.5V), its appear- ance is barely distorted, almost with a perfect circu- lar symmetry. It is thus proposed that SC3 is a pro- plyd seen face-on, located deep behind θ1 Ori C with the physical separation much larger than the apparent projection (Robberto, Beckwith, & Panagia 2002). SC3 is visible in the optical (e.g., Smith et al. 2005), and at near-infrared wavelengths (McCaughrean & Stauffer 1994), which also lends support to its proplyd nature. The infrared appearance of SC3 is in strong contrast to Her 36 SE. We may use the highly distorted dust emis- sion from Her 36 SE as circumstantial evidence that the source is actually under the influence of Herschel 36, and that the physical distance to the O star is not signifi- cantly larger than it appears. On the other hand, σ Ori IRS 1, found next to σ Ori- onis, shares a similar morphology with Her 36 SE. It is a compact infrared source at 1200 AU away from the O9.5V star, and features a fan-shaped emission with σ Orionis at the apex (van Loon & Oliveira 2003), ex- actly as Herschel 36 is to SE. The mid-infrared spectrum of σ Ori IRS 1 shows the partly crystalline silicate in emission. The presence of processed silicates suggests significant grain growth which is naturally present in a circumstellar disk. A proplyd is therefore again the most probable cause of σ Ori IRS 1, especially because a cen- tral star has been detected recently in the K-band con- tinuum emission (B. Stecklum, private communication). The star-forming region around Herschel 36 has many features in common with the Orion Nebula Cluster. The local concentration of massive stars, like Her 36 B, together forms a Trapezium-like cluster around Her- schel 36. The presence of known proplyd nearby at G5.97−1.17 (Stecklum et al. 1998) underscores the physical similarity as well. The mid-infrared color of Her 36 SE, and the close vicinity to an O-type star with a distorted morphology suggestive of radiative influence of it all point toward Her 36 SE is also a proplyd with a low-mass star at its center, as is the case for SC3 at θ1 Ori C and σ Ori IRS 1. However, in addition to the radio luminosity hardly accounted for by a low-mass star, and no ionized-front outside the dusty cloud; a pro- plyd cannot explain the lack of a point source to be de- tected at the continuum wavelengths that comes from the photospheric emission of the star. In the case of no central star inside, another possibility would be that Her 36 SE is an evaporating gaseous globule, a failed pro- plyd without an internal star in formation. These star- less cores have been detected in numbers toward M 16 (McCaughrean & Andersen 2002). However, a hypothet- ical starless globule conflicts with the presence of the un- resolved Br γ emission apparently inside of Her 36 SE. We therefore propose that Her 36 SE harbors a rela- tively massive star of early B-type producing a squeezed H II region inside the dusty cloud (Keto 2003), but the star itself is completely obscured. The distortion of dust emission as well as the diffuse emission downstream of Her 36 SE, indicates the close physical interaction of Her- schel 36 and SE. Herschel 36 SE, now in the process of being blown away, is a showcase for the violent impact of the dominant O-star in a cluster on another early-type star nearby. We thank all the staff and crew of the VLT and Subaru for their valuable assistance in obtaining the data, and Thorsten Ratzka, Elena Puga and Wolfgang Brandner for their indispensable help in reducing data. We appre- ciate the anonymous referee for many critical comments that are necessary to improve the paper. M.G. is sup- ported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science fellowship. Arias, J. I., Barb´a, R. H., Ma´iz Apell´anz, J., Morrell, N. I., & Rubio, M. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 739 Apai, D., Linz, H., Henning, Th., & Stecklum, B. 2005, A&A, 434, 987 REFERENCES Infrared Imaging of Herschel 36 SE 7 Allen, D. A. 1986, MNRAS, 219, 35 Bik, A. 2004, PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam Charkraborty, A., & Anandarao, B. G. 1997, AJ, 114, 1576 Cohen, M., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 1864 Crowther, P. A., Massive Star Birth: A Crossroads of Astrophysics, International Astronomical Union. Symposium no. 227, 389, on May 2005 in Italy, eds. R. Cesaroni, M. Felli, E. Churchwell, M. Walmsley, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, astro-ph/0506324 Ducati, J. R., Bevilacqua, C. M., Rembold, S. B., & Ribeiro, D. 2001, ApJ, 558, 309 Dyck, H. M. 1977, AJ, 1977, 82, 129 Feldt, M., Stecklum, B., Henning, Th., Launhardt, R., & Hayward, T. L. 1999, A&A, 346, 243 Feldt, M., Puga, E., Lenzen, R., Henning, Th., Brandner, W., Stecklum, B., Lagrange, A.-M., Gendron, E., & Rousset, G. 2003, ApJ, 599, L91 Gaessler, W., et al. 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4494, 30 Grady, C. A., Woodgate, B., Torres, Carlos A. O., Henning, Th., Apai, D., Rodmann, J., Wang, Hongchi, Stecklum, B., Linz, H., Williger, G. M., Brown, A., Wilkinson, E., Harper, G. M., Herczeg, G. J., Danks, A., Vieira, G. L., Malumuth, E., Collins, N. R., & Hill, R. S. 2004, ApJ, 608, 809 Hartung, M., Lenzen, R., Hofmann, R., Bohm, A., Brandner, W., Finger, G., Fusco, T., Lacombe, F. Laun, W., Ganier, P., Storz, C., & Wagner, K. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 425 Hayward, T. L, Houch, J. R., & Miles, J. W. 1994, ApJ, 433, 157 Henning, Th., Feldt, M., Stecklum, B., & Klein, R. A&A, 2001, 370, 100 Kobayashi, N., et al. 2000, Proc. SPIE, 4008, 1056 Keto, E. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1196 Leinert, C., Graser, U., Waters, L. B. F. M., Perrin, G. S., Walter, J., Bruno, L., Przygodda, F., Chesneau, O., Schuller, P. A., Grlazenborg-Kluttig, Annelie, W., Laun, W., Ligori, S., Meisner, J. A., Wagner, K., Bakker, E. J., Cotton, B.; de Jong, J., Mathar, R., Neumann, U., & Storz, C. 2003, Proc. SPIE 4838, 893 Lenzen, R., Hartung, M., Brandner, W., Finger, G., Hubin, N. N., Lacombe, F., Lagrange, A.-M., Lehnert, M. D., Moorwood, A. F. M., & Mouillet, D. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 860 Linz, H., Stecklum, B., Henning, Th., Hofner, P., & Brandl, B. 2005, A&A, 429, 903 Lord, S. D. 1992, A New Software Tool for Computing Earth's Atmosphere Transmissions of Near- and Far-Infrared Radiation, NASA Technical Memoir 103957 (Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center) Maiz-Apellaniz, J., Walborn, N. R., Galue H. A., Wei, L. H. 2004, ApJS, 151, 103 Mathis, J. S. 1990, ARA&A, 28, 37 McCaughrean, M. J., & Stauffer, J. R. 1994, AJ, 108, 1382 McCaughrean, M. J., & Andersen, M. 2002, A&A, 389, 513 Neufeld, D. A., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1996, ApJ, 471, L45 Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, Th. 1994, A&A, 291, 943 Panagia, N. 1973, AJ, 78 929 Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Henning, Th., Stecklum, B., & Brandl, B. Puga, E., Alvarez, C., Feldt, M., Henning, Th., & Wolf, S. 2004, 2004, A&A, 426, 523 A&A, 425, 543 897 Rieke, G. H., & Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, ApJ, 288, 618 Robberto, M., Beckwith, S. V. W., & Panagia, N. 2002, ApJ, 578, Rousset, G., Lacombe, F., Puget, P., Gendron, E., Arsenault, R., Kern, P. Y., Rabaud, D., Madec, P.-Y., Hubin, N. N., Zins, G., Stadler, E., Charton, J., Gigan, P., Feautrier, P. 2000, Proc. SPIE, 407, 72 Ryter, Ch. E. 1996, Ap&SS, 236, 285 Smith, N., Bally, J., Shuping, R. Y., Morris, M., & Kassis, M. 2005, AJ, 130, 1778 Stecklum, B., Henning, Th., Eckart, A., Howell, R. R., & Hoare, M. G. 1995, ApJ, 445, L153 Stecklum, B., Henning, Th., Feldt, M., Hayward, T. L, Hoare, M. G., Hofner, P., & Richter, S. 1998, AJ, 115, 767 Storey, P. J., & Hummer, D. G. 1995, MNRAS Takami, H., et al. 2004, PASJ, 56, 225 Tokunaga, A. T., et al. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3354, 512 van Loon, J. Th., & Oliveira, J. M. 2003, A&A, 405, L33 van den Ancker, M. E., Th´e, P. S., Feinstein, A., V´azquez, R. A., de Winter, D., & P´erez, M. R. 1997, A&AS, 123, 63 Woodward, C. E., Pipher, J. L., Helfer, H. L., Sharpless, S., Moneti, A., Kozikowski, D., Oliveri, M., Willner, S. P., Lacasse, M. G., & Herter, T. 1986, AJ, 91, 870 Woodward, C. E., Pipher, J. L, Helfer, H. L, & Forrest, W. J. 1990, ApJ, 365, 252 Woolf, N. J. 1961, PASP, 73, 206 Woolf, N. J., Stein, W. A., Gillett, F. C., Merrill, K. M., Becklin, E. E., Neugebauer, G., Pepin, T. J., 1973, ApJ, 179, L111
astro-ph/0309501	1	0309	2003-09-17T21:58:48	Tomographic 3D-Modeling of the Solar Corona with FASR	[ "astro-ph" ]	The "Frequency-Agile Solar Radiotelescope" (FASR) litteraly opens up a new dimension in addition to the 3D Euclidian geometry: the frequency dimension. The 3D geometry is degenerated to 2D in all images from astronomical telescopes, but the additional frequency dimension allows us to retrieve the missing third dimension by means of physical modeling. We call this type of 3D reconstruction "Frequency Tomography". In this study we simulate a realistic 3D model of an active region, composed of 500 coronal loops with the 3D geometry [x(s),y(s),z(s)] constrained by magnetic field extrapolations and the physical parameters of the density n_e(s) and temperature T_e(s) given by hydrostatic solutions. We simulate a series of 20 radio images in a frequency range of f=0.1-10 GHz, anticipating the capabilities of FASR, and investigate what physical information can be retrieved from such a dataset. We discuss also forward-modeling of the chromospheric and Quiet Sun density and temperature structure, another primary goal of future FASR science.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Tomographic 3D-Modeling of the Solar Corona with FASR Markus J. Aschwanden, David Alexander, and Marc DeRosa Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Solar & Astrophysics Laboratory, Dept. L9-41, Bldg.252, 3251 Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; e-mail: [email protected] 2002/Oct/14 Abstract. The Frequency-Agile Solar Radiotelescope (FASR) litteraly opens up a new dimension in addition to the 3D Euclidian geometry: the frequency dimension. The 3D geometry is degenerated to 2D in all images from astronomical telescopes, but the additional frequency dimension allows us to retrieve the missing third dimen- sion by means of physical modeling. We call this type of 3D reconstruction Frequency Tomography. In this study we simulate a realistic 3D model of an active region, composed of 500 coronal loops with the 3D geometry [x(s), y(s), z(s)] constrained by magnetic field extrapolations and the physical parameters of the density ne(s) and temperature Te(s) given by hydrostatic solutions. We simulate a series of 20 radio images in a frequency range of ν = 0.1 − 10 GHz, anticipating the capabilities of FASR, and investigate what physical information can be retrieved from such a dataset. We discuss also forward-modeling of the chromospheric and Quiet Sun density and temperature structure, another primary goal of future FASR science. Keywords: Sun : corona -- Sun : chromosphere -- Sun : radio 1. INTRODUCTION Three-dimensional (3D) modeling of solar phenomena has always been a challenge with the available two-dimensional (2D) images, but is an utmost necessity to test physical models in a quantitative way. Since solar imaging telescopes never have been launched on multiple space- craft that separate to a significant parallax angle from the Earth, no true 3D imaging or solar tomography (Davila 1994; Gary, Davis, & Moore 1998; Liewer et al. 2001) has been performed so far. The Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO), now being assembled and planned for launch in November 2005, will be the first true stereo- scopic facility, mapping the Sun with an increasing separation angle of 22◦ per year. Alternative approaches of 3D reconstruction methods utilize the solar rotation to vary the aspect angle (Altschuler 1979; Berton & Sakurai 1985; Koutchmy & Molodensky 1992; Aschwanden & Bastian 1994a,b; Batchelor 1994; Hurlburt et al. 1994; Zidowitz 1999; Koutchmy, Merzlyakov, & Molodensky 2001), but this method gener- ally requires static structures over several days. An advanced form of c(cid:13) 2018 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.1 2 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA solar rotation stereoscopy is the so-called dynamic stereoscopy method (Aschwanden et al. 1999, 2000a), where the 3D geometry of dynamic plasma structures can be reconstructed as long as the guiding magnetic field is quasi-stationary. Of course, 3D modeling with 2D constraints can also be attempted if a-priori assumptions are made for the ge- ometry, e.g. using the assumption of coplanar and semi-circular loops (Nitta, VanDriel-Gestelyi, & Harra-Murnion 1999). A new branch of 3D modeling is the combination of 2D images I(x, y) with the frequency dimension ν, which we call frequency tomog- raphy. There have been only very few attempts to apply this method to solar data, mainly because multi-frequency imaging was not available or had insufficient spatial resolution. There are essentially only three published studies that employ the method of frequency tomography: Aschwanden et al. (1995); Bogod & Grebinskij (1997); Grebinskij et al. (2000.). In the first study (Aschwanden et al. 1995), gyroresonance emission above a sunspot was observed at 7 frequencies in both polarizations in the frequency range of ν = 10 − 14 GHz with the Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO) during 4 days. From stereoscopic correlations the height levels h(ν) of each frequency could be determined above the sunspot. Correcting for the jump in height when dominant gyroreso- nance emission switches from the second (s = 2) to the third harmonic (s = 3), the magnetic field B(ν) = 357(νGHz/s) [G] could then be de- rived as a function of height, B(h), and was found to fit a classical dipole field B(h) = B0(1 + h/hD)−3. Moreover, from the measured bright- ness temperature spectrum TB(ν), using the same stereoscopic height measurement h(ν), also the temperature profile T (h) as a function of height above the sunspot could be determined. This study represents an application of frequency tomography, additionally supported with solar rotation stereoscopy, and thus is subject to the requirement of quasi-stationary structures. In the second study (Bogod & Grebinskij 1997), brightness temper- ature spectra TB(ν) were measured in 36 frequencies in the wavelength range of λ = 2 − 32 cm (ν = 0.94 − 15 GHz) with RATAN-600, from quiet-Sun regions, active region plages, and from coronal holes. A dif- ferential deconvolution method of Laplace transform inversion was then used to infer the electron temperature T (τ ) as a function of the opacity τ . This method does not yield the temperature as a function of an absolute height h, but if an atmospheric model [T (h), ne(h)] is available as a function of height, the temperature as a function of the free-free (bremsstrahlung) opacity T (τ ) can be calculated and compared with the observations. fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.2 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 3 B B (ν) and T LCP In the third study (Grebinskij et al. 2000), the brightness temper- ature in both polarizations is measured as a function of frequency, i.e. T RCP (ν). Since the magnetic field has a slightly different refractive index in the two circular polarizations, the free- free (bremsstrahlung) opacity is consequently also slightly different, so that the magnetic field B(ν) can be inferred. Again, a physical model [T (h), ne(h), B(h)] is needed to predict B(ν) and to compare it with the observed spectrum TB(ν). The content of this paper is as follows: In Section 2 we simulate an active region, with the 3D geometry constrained by an observed mag- netogram and the physical parameters given by hydrostatic solutions, which are used to calculate FASR radio images in terms of brightness temperature maps TB(x, y, ν), and test how the physical parameters of individual coronal loops can be retrieved with FASR tomography. In Section 3 we discuss a few examples of chromospheric and Quiet- Sun corona modeling to illustrate the power and limitations of FASR tomography. In the final Section 5 we summarize some primary goals of FASR science that can be pursued with frequency tomography. 2. ACTIVE REGION MODELING 2.1. Simulation of FASR Images Our aim is to build a realistic 3D model of an active region, in form of 3D distributions of the electron density ne(x, y, z) and electron temper- ature Te(x, y, z), which can be used to simulate radio brightness temper- ature maps TB(x, y, ν) at arbitrary frequencies ν that can be obtained with the planned Frequency-Agile Solar Radiotelescope (FASR). We start from a magnetogram recorded with the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) instrument onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Obser- vatory (SoHO) on 1999 May 8, 0-1 UT. We perform a potential field extrapolation with the magnetogram as lower boundary condition of the photospheric magnetic field, to obtain the 3D geometry of magnetic field lines. We apply a threshold for the minimum magnetic field at the footpoints, which limits the number of extrapolated field lines to n = 500. The projection of these 3D field lines along the line-of-sight onto the solar disk is shown in Fig.1. We basically see two groups of field lines, (1) a compact double arcade with low-lying field lines in an active region in the north-east quadrant of the Sun, and (2) a set of large-scale field lines that spread out from the eastern active region to the west and close in the western hemisphere. From this set of field lines we have constrained the 3D geometry of 500 coronal loops, defined by a length coordinate s(x, y, z). fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.3 4 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA MDI 1999-May-8, 0-1 UT ] i i d a r r a o s [ x l e c n a i t s d S N 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 EW distance x[solar radii] 0.5 Figure 1. Potential field extrapolation of SoHO/MDI magnetogram data from 1999 May 8, 0-1 UT. In a next step we fill the 500 loops with coronal plasma with density ne(s) and temperature functions Te(s) that obey hydrostatic solutions. For accurate analytical approximations of hydrostatic solutions we used the code given in Aschwanden & Schrijver (2002). Each hydrostatic solution is defined by three independent parameters: the loop length L, the loop base heating rate EH0, and the heating scale height sH. The momentum and energy balance equation (between the heating rate and radiative and conductive loss rate, i.e. EH(s) + Erad(s) + Econd(s) = 0, yields a unique solution for each parameter set (L, sH, EH0). For the set of short loops located in the compact double arcade, which have have lengths of L ≈ 4 −100 Mm, we choose a heating scale height of sH = 10 Mm and base heating rates that are randomly distributed in the loga- rithmic interval of EH0 = 10−4, ..., 10−2 erg cm−3 s−1. For the group of fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.4 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 5 log(L)= 9.9+ log(L)= 9.9+ 0.2 log(L)=10.7+ log(L)=10.7+ 0.3 10-7 10-8 10-9 i n b r e p r e b m u N 10-10 N=413,234 1010 1011 length L log(Te)= 6.1+ log(Te)= 6.1+ 0.2 log(Te)= 5.9+ log(Te)= 5.9+ 0.3 109 i i n n b b r r e e p p r r e e b b m m u u N N 10-3 10-3 10-4 10-4 10-5 10-5 10-6 10-6 log(ne)=10.8+ log(ne)=10.8_ 0.7 log(ne)= 9.3+ log(ne)= 9.3_ 0.7 108 107 1010 Max. density ne,max [cm-3] 109 log(ne)= 8.8+ log(ne)= 8.8_ 0.6 log(ne)= 4.3+ log(ne)= 4.3_ 2.6 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 i n b r e p r e b m u N 1012 106 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 i n b r e p r e b m u N 105 105 106 106 Max. temperature Te,max [K] Max. temperature Te,max [K] 107 107 106 108 107 Min. density ne,min [cm-3] 109 1010 1011 1011 Figure 2. Distributions of loop lengths L, loop maximum temperatures Te,max, loop minimum densities nmin, and maximum densities nmax. The distributions with thick linestyle correspond to ≈ 400 loops in the compact arcade, while the distributions with thin linestyle correspond to the group of ≈ 100 large-scale loops. long loops with lengths of L ≈ 100 − 800 Mm, we choose near-uniform heating (sH = 800 Mm) and volumetric heating rates randomly dis- tributed in the logarithmic interval of EH0 = 0.5 × 10−7, ..., 0.5 × 10−5 erg cm−3 s−1. This choice of heating rates produces a distribution of loop maximum temperatures (at the loop tops) of Te ≈ 1 − 3 MK, electron densities of ne ≈ 108, ..., 1010 cm−3 at the footpoints, and ne ≈ 106, ..., 109 cm−3 at the loop tops. We show the distribution of loop top temperatures, loop base densities, and loop top densities in Fig.2. These parameters are considered to be realistic in the sense that they reproduce typical loop densities and temperatures observed with SoHO and TRACE, as well as correspond to the measured heating scale heights of sH ≈ 10 − 20 Mm (Aschwanden, Nightingale, & Alexander 2000b), for the set of short loops. For the simulation of radio images we choose an image size of 512 × 512 pixels, with a pixel size of 2.25", and 21 frequencies logarithmically distributed between ν = 100 MHz and 10 GHz. To each magnetic field line we attribute a loop with a width (or column depth) of w ≈ 108, ..., 109 cm. For each voxel, i.e. volume element at x = (xi, yj, zk), we calculate the free-free absorption coefficient κf f (e.g. Lang 1980, fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.5 6 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA ν= 100 MHz TB= 0.06 MK ν= 125 MHz TB= 0.07 MK ν= 158 MHz TB= 0.08 MK ∆x=200.0 arcsec ν= 199 MHz TB= 0.10 MK ∆x=158.9 arcsec ν= 251 MHz TB= 0.13 MK ∆x=126.2 arcsec ν= 316 MHz TB= 0.16 MK ∆x=100.2 arcsec ν= 398 MHz TB= 0.24 MK ∆x= 79.6 arcsec ν= 501 MHz TB= 0.35 MK ∆x= 63.2 arcsec ν= 630 MHz TB= 0.44 MK ∆x= 50.2 arcsec ν= 794 MHz TB= 0.46 MK ∆x= 39.9 arcsec ν=1000 MHz TB= 0.51 MK ∆x= 31.7 arcsec ν=1258 MHz TB= 0.51 MK ∆x= 25.2 arcsec ∆x= 20.0 arcsec ∆x= 15.9 arcsec Figure 3. Simulation of radio brightness temperature maps of an active region at 20 frequencies, from ν=100 to 1258 MHz. The maximum brightness temperature (TB) and the angular resolution ∆x are indicated in each frame. fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.6 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 7 ν= 0.79 GHz TB= 0.46 MK ν= 1.00 GHz TB= 0.51 MK ν= 1.26 GHz TB= 0.51 MK ∆x= 25.2 arcsec ν= 1.58 GHz TB= 0.48 MK ∆x= 20.0 arcsec ν= 2.00 GHz TB= 0.57 MK ∆x= 15.9 arcsec ν= 2.51 GHz TB= 0.47 MK ∆x= 12.6 arcsec ν= 3.16 GHz TB= 0.85 MK ∆x= 10.0 arcsec ν= 3.98 GHz TB= 1.00 MK ∆x= 8.0 arcsec ν= 5.01 GHz TB= 1.06 MK ∆x= 6.3 arcsec ν= 6.31 GHz TB= 1.84 MK ∆x= 5.0 arcsec ν= 7.94 GHz TB= 1.85 MK ∆x= 4.0 arcsec ν=10.00 GHz TB= 1.60 MK ∆x= 3.2 arcsec ∆x= 2.5 arcsec ∆x= 2.0 arcsec Figure 4. Similar representation as in Fig.3, for frequencies of ν=0.8 to 10 GHz, with a smaller field-of-view than in Fig.3. The brightness is shown on linear scale in the first two rows, and on logarithmic scale in the last two rows (with a contrast of 1:100 in the third row and 1:1000 in forth row). fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.7 8 p.47), ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA f f (xi, yj, zk) = 9.78 × 10−3 n2 κν e,ijk ν2T 3/2 e,ijk [24.2 + ln (Te,ijk) − ln (ν)] , (1) and integrate the opacity τ ν f f along the line-of-sight z, τ ν f f (xi, yj, zk) = Z z −∞ κν f f (xi, yj, zk)dz′ , (2) to obtain the radio brightness temperature T ν transfer equation (in the Rayleigh-Jeans limit), B(xi, yj) with the radiative T ν B(xi, yj) = Z +∞ −∞ Te,ijk exp−τ ν f f ((xi,yj,zk) κν f f (xi, yj, zk)dz , (3) The simulated images for the frequency range of ν=100 MHz to 10 GHz are shown in Figs.3 and 4. The approximate instrumental resolution is rendered by smoothing the simulated images with a boxcar that corresponds to the instrumental resolution of FASR, wres = 20" νGHz . (4) A caveat needs to be made, that the real reconstructed radio im- ages may reach this theoretical resolution only if a sufficient number of Fourier components are available, either from a large number of baselines (which scale with the square of the number of dishes) or from aperture synthesis (which increases the number of Fourier components during Earth rotation proportionally to the accumulation time inter- val). Also, we did not include here the effects of angular scattering due to turbulence or other coronal inhomogeneities (Bastian 1994, 1995). 2.2. Peak Brightness Temperature The intensity of radio maps is usually specified in terms of the observed brightness temperature TB. We list the peak brightness temperature in each map in Figs.3 and 4. We see that a maximum brightness is observed in the second-last map in Fig.4, with TB = 1.85 MK at a frequency of ν = 7.94 GHz. Let us obtain some understanding of the relative brightness temperatures TB(ν) as function of frequency ν, in order to faciliate the interpretation of radio maps. We plot the peak brightness temperature TB(ν) of the simulated maps as function of frequency in Fig.5 (cross symbols). There are two counter-acting effects that reduce the brightness temperature: First, the loops become fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.8 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 9 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 ] K M [ B T e r u t a r e p m e t s s e n t h g i r B 0.0 0.1 B H C 1.0 Frequency ν [GHz] 10.0 Figure 5. The radio peak brightness temperature TB is shown as function of fre- quency ν: for the background corona (B), for cool (C) fat loops (T=0.5 MK, ne = 1011 cm−3, w=25 Mm), and hot (H) thin loops (T=2.0 MK, ne = 1011 cm−3, w=2.5 Mm). The cross symbols indicate the peak brightness temperatures observed in the simulated maps (Figs.3 and 4), while the medium-thick line represents the combined model of hot and cool loops. The dashed line indicates the expected brightness temperature of hot loops if no beam dilution due to the instrumental angular resolution would occur. The thick grey curve (B) indicates a model of the background corona. optically thin at high frequencies due to the ν −2-dependence of the free-free opacity (Eq.1). Hot loops with a temperature of T=2.0 MK, a density of ne = 1011 cm−3, and a width of w=2.5 Mm are optically thick below ν < ∼ 5 GHz, so the brightness temperature would match the electron temperature TB = Te (dashed line in Fig.5), but falls off at higher frequencies, i.e. TB(ν > 5 GHz)< Te. The second effect that reduces the brightness temperature is the beam dilution, which has a ν2-dependence below the critical frequency where structures are unresolved. The effectively observed brightness temperature T ef f B (ν) due to beam dilution for a structure with width w is B (ν) = TB ×( (cid:16) ν νcrit(cid:17)2 T ef f 1 for ν < νcrit(w) for ν > νcrit(w) (5) fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.9 10 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA where the critical frequency νcrit(w) depends on the width w of the structure and is for FASR according to Eq.(4), νcrit(w) = 20" w" [GHz] . (6) Because the brightness drops drastically below νcrit ≈ 5 GHz in Fig.5, we conclude that the width of the unresolved structures is about w" = 20"/5 = 4" = 3 Mm. Therefore we can understand the peak brightness temperatures in the maps, as shown in Fig.5 (crosses) in the range of ν ≈ 3 − 10 GHz with a combination of these two effects of free-free opacity and beam dilution. Below a frequency of ν < ∼ 3 GHz, we see that another group of loops contributes to the peak brightness of the maps. We find that the peak brightness below 3 GHz can adequately be understood by a group of cooler loops with a temperature of T = 0.5 MK, densities of ne = 1011 cm−3, and widths of w = 25 Mm (Fig.5). Thus cool loops dominate the brightness at low frequencies, and hot loops at higher frequencies. In the simulations in Figs.3 and 4 we have not included the back- ground corona. In order to give a comparison of the effect of the background corona we calculate the opacity for a space-filling corona with an average temperature of T = 1.0 MK, an average density of ne = 109 cm−3, and a vertical (isothermal) scale height of w ≈ λT ≈ 50 Mm. The brightness temperature of this background corona is shown with a thick grey curve (labeled B) in Fig.5. According to this estimate, the background corona overwhelms the brightest active region loops at frequencies of ν < ∼ 1 GHz. From this we conclude that it might be difficult to observe active region loops at decimetric frequencies ν < ∼ 1.0 GHz, unless they are very high and stick out above a density scale height, i.e. at altitudes of h > ∼ 50 Mm. In conclusion, the contrast of active region loops in our example seems to be best at frequencies of ν ≈ 5 GHz, but drops at both sides of this optimum frequency (see Fig.5). 2.3. Temperature and Density Diagnostic of Loops FASR will provide simultaneous sets of images I(x, y, ν) at many fre- quencies ν. In other words, for every image position (xi, yj), a spectrum T ij B (ν) can be obtained. A desirable capability is temperature and density diagnostic of active region loops. Let us parameterize the pro- jected position of a loop by a length coordinate sk, k = 1, ..., n, e.g. [xi = x(sk), yj = y(sk)]. If we manage to determine the temperature Te(xi, yj) and density ne(xi, yi) at every loop position (xi, yj), we have a diagnostic of the temperature profile T (s) and density profile ne(s) of fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.10 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 11 2.0 1.5 ] K M [ B T 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 2.0 1.5 ] K M [ B T 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 2.0 1.5 ] K M [ B T 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 Temperature increase Te=0.1,...,2.0 MK ne=1.0 * 1010 cm-3 w=10 Mm Temperature decrease 1.0 10.0 Te=1.0 MK ne=0.1,...,2.0 * 1010 cm-3 w=10 Mm Density increase Density decrease 1.0 10.0 Te=1.0 MK ne=1.0 * 1010 cm-3 w=1,...,20 Mm Width increase Width decrease 1.0 Frequency ν [GHz] 10.0 Figure 6. The variation of the radio brightness temperature spectrum TB(ν) of a loop by varying the temperature Te (top panel), the electron density ne (middle panel), and the loop width w (bottom panel). In each of the three panels, one parameter is varied from 10%, 20%, ..., 90% (dashed curves) to 110%, 120%,... , 200% (solid lines). The reference curve with parameters Te = 1.0 MK, ne = 1010 cm−3, and w = 10 Mm is indicated with a thick line. The arrows indicate the spectral shift of the peak. fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.11 12 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA an active region loop. Thus, the question is whether we can manage to extract a temperature Te and density ne from a brightness temperature spectrum TB(ν) at a given pixel position (i, j). In order to illustrate the feasibility of this task, we show the brightness temperature spectrum TB(ν) of a typical active region loop in Fig.6, and display its variation as a function of the physical (Te, ne) and geometric (w) parameters. We define a typical active region loop by an electron temperature Te = 1.0 MK, an electron density ne = 1010 cm−3, and a width w = 10 Mm. Such a loop is brightest at frequencies of ν ≈ 1.5 −3.0 GHz (Fig.6; thick curve). The loop is fainter at higher frequencies because free-free emission becomes optically thin, while it is optically thick at lower frequencies. The reason why the loop is also fainter at low frequencies is because of the beam dilution at frequencies where the instrument does not resolve the loop diameter. If we increase the temperature, the brightness temperature increases, and vice versa decreases at lower electron temperatures (Fig.6 top). If we increase the density, the crit- ical frequency where the loop becomes optically thin shifts to higher frequencies, while the peak brightness temperature decreases for lower densities (Fig.6, middle panel). If we increase the width of the loops, the brightness temperature spectrum is bright in a much larger frequency range, because we shift the critical frequency for beam dilution towards lower frequencies, while the overall brightness temperature decreases for a smaller loop width (Fig.6 bottom). Based on this little tutorial, one can essentially understand how the optimization works in spectral fitting (e.g. with a forward-fitting technique) to an observed brightness temperature spectrum TB(ν). To demonstrate how the density and temperature diagnostic works in practice, we pick a bright loop seen at ν = 5.0 GHz in Fig.4, which we show as an enlarged detail in Fig.7 (left panel). We pick three lo- cations (A,B,C) along the loop and extract the brightness temperature spectra TB(ν) from the simulated datacube TB(x, y, ν) at the locations (A,B,C), shown in Fig.7 (three middle panels). Each spectrum shows two peaks, which we interpret as two cospatial loops. For each spectral peak we can therefore roughly fit a loop model, constrained by three parameters each, i.e. [Te, ne, w]. We can now fit a brightness temper- ature spectrum T ef f B (ν) to the observed (or simulated here) spectrum T obs B (ν), physically defined by the same radiation transfer model for free-free emission as in Eqs.(1-5), but simplified by the approximation of constant parameters (Te, ne), and thus a constant absorption coefficient κf f (ν), over the relatively small spatial extent of a loop diameter w, κf f (ν) = 9.78 × 10−3 n2 ν2T 3/2 e e [24.2 + ln (Te) − ln (ν)] , (7) fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.12 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY ] K M 13 4 3 2 ] K M [ B T ν= 5.01 MHz TB= 1.06 MK B A C ] K M [ B T A B C 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 10.0 ] 3 - m c [ e n y t i s n e D 1.0 10.0 [ e T p m e T 1 0 0.0 1012 1011 1010 109 108 20 0.0 ] m M [ w h t i d W 15 10 5 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.5 1.5 Loop length s/L 1.0 2.0 0.1 1.0 Frequency ν [MHz] 10.0 Figure 7. Enlarged detail of the active region with a bright loop (left panel). From the measured brightness temperature spectra TB(ν) (crosses in middle panels) at the three loop locations (A,B,C) we fit theoretical spectra and determine the tem- peratures (right top panel), densities (right middle panel), and loop widths (right bottom panel) at the three loop locations (A,B,C). τf f (ν) = κf f (ν) w , TB(ν) = Te(cid:16)1 − exp−τf f (ν)(cid:17) , T ef f B (ν) = TB ×( (cid:16) ν νcrit(cid:17)2 1 for ν < νcrit(w) for ν > νcrit(w) (8) (9) (10) What can immediately be determined from the observed brightness temperature spectra T obs B (ν) are the frequencies of the spectral peaks (Fig.7, middle panels), which are found around νpeak = 1.2 and 6.0 GHz. Based on the tutorial given in Fig.6 it is clear that these spec- tral peaks demarcate the critical frequencies where structures become unresolved. Thus we can immediately determine the diameters of the two loops with Eq.(6), i.e. w1 = 20"/1.2 = 17" = 12.0 Mm and w2 = 20"/6.0 = 3.3" = 2.4 Mm. The only thing left to do is to vary the temperature and density and to fit the model (Eqs.7-10) to the observed spectrum. For an approximate solution (shown as smooth curves in fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.13 14 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA the middle panels of Fig.7) we find T1 = 3.0 MK and n1 = 4 × 1010 cm−3 for the first loop (with width w1 = 2.5 Mm and spectral peak at ν1 = 6.0 GHz), and T2 = 2.9 MK and n2 = 1.9 × 109 cm−3 for the second loop (with width w2 = 12 Mm and spectral peak at ν1 = 1.2 GHz). The resulting temperature Te(s) and density profiles ne(s) along the loops are shown in Fig.7 (right panels). This approximate fit is just an example to illustrate the concept of forward-fitting to FASR tomographic data. More information can be extracted from the data by detailed fits with variable loop cross-section along the loop and proper deconvolution of the projected column depth across the loop diameter (which is a function of the aspect angle between the line-of-sight and the loop axis). For a proper determination of the inclination angle of the loop plane, the principle of dynamic stereoscopy can be applied (Aschwanden et al. 1999; see Appendix A therein for coordinate trans- formations between the observers reference frame and the loop plane). Of course, our example is somehow idealized, in practice there will be confusion by adjacent or intersecting loops, as well as confusion by other radiation mechanisms, such as gyroresonance emission that competes with free-free emission at frequencies of ν > ∼ 5 GHz near sunspots. 2.4. Radio versus EUV and soft X-ray diagnostics We can ask whether temperature and density diagnostic of coronal loops is better done in other wavelengths, such as in EUV and soft X-rays (e.g. Aschwanden et al. 1999), rather than with radio tomog- raphy. Free-free emission in EUV and soft X-rays is optically thin, which has the advantage that every loop along a line-of-sight is visible to some extent, while loops in optically thick plasmas can be hidden at radio wavelengths. On the other side, the line-of-sight confusion in optically thin plasmas is larger in EUV and soft X-rays, in particular if multiple loops along the same line-of-sight have similar temperatures. Different loops along a line-of-sight can only be discriminated in EUV and soft X-rays if they have significantly different temperatures, so that they show different responses in lines with different ionization temperatures. Two cospatial loops that have similar temperatures but different widths cannot be distinguished by EUV or soft X-ray detec- tors. In radio wavelengths, however, even cospatial loops with similar temperatures, as the two loops in our example in Fig.7 (T1 = 3.0 MK and T2 = 2.9 MK), can be separated if they have different widths. The reason is that they have different critical frequencies νcrit(w) where they become resolved, and thus show up as two different peaks in the brightness temperature spectrum T ef f B (ν). Radio tomography has therefore a number of unique advantages over loop analysis in EUV fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.14 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 15 and soft X-ray wavelengths: (1) a ground-based instrument is much less costly than a space-based instrument, (2) a wide spectral radio wavelength range (decimetric, centimetric) provides straightforwardly diagnostic over a wide temperature range, while an equivalent tempera- ture diagnostic in EUV and soft X-rays would require a large number of spectral lines and instrumental filters, (3) optically thick radio emission is most sensitive to cool plasma, which is undetectable in EUV and soft X-rays, except for absorption in the case of very dense cool plasmas, and (4) radio brightness temperature spectra can discriminate multiple cospatial structures with identical temperatures based on their spatial scale, which is not possible with optically thin EUV and soft X-ray emission. 3. CHROMOSPHERIC AND CORONAL MODELING The vertical density and temperature structure of the chromosphere, transition region, and corona has been probed in soft X-rays, EUV, and in radio wavelengths, but detailed models that are consistent in all wavelengths are still unavailable. Comprehensive coverage of the multi-thermal and inhomogeneous solar corona necessarily requires ei- ther many wavelength filters in soft X-rays and EUV, or many radio frequencies, for which FASR will be the optimum instrument. We illustrate the concept of how to explore the vertical structure of the chromosphere and corona with a few simple examples. We know that the corona is highly inhomogeneous along any line-of-sight, so a 3D model has to be composed of a distribution of many magnetic fluxtubes, each one representing a mini-atmosphere with its own density and tem- perature structure, being isolated from each other due to the low value of the plasma-beta, i.e. β = pthermal/pmagn = 2nekBTe/(B2/8π) ≪ 1. The confusion due to inhomogeneous temperatures and densities is largest for line-of-sights above the limb (due to the longest column depths with contributing opacity), and is smallest for line-of-sights near the solar disk center, where we look down through the atmosphere in vertical direction. The simplest model of the atmosphere is given by the hydrostatic equilibrium in the isothermal approximation, T (h) = const, where the hydrostatic scale height λT is proportional to the electron temperature T , i.e. λT = (11) kBT µmpg⊙ = λ0(cid:16) T 1 MK(cid:17) with λ0 = 47 Mm for coronal conditions, with µmp the average ion mass (i.e. µ ≈ 1.3 for H:He=10:1) and g⊙ the solar gravitation. The fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.15 16 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA height dependence of the electron density is for gravitational pressure balance, ne(h) = n0 exp[− (h − h0) λ0T ] . (12) where n0 = n(h0) is the base electron density. This expression for the density ne(h) can then be inserted into the free-free absorption coefficient κ(h, ν), with T (h) = const in the isothermal approximation, κf f (h, ν) = 9.78 × 10−3 n2 e(h) ν2T (h)3/2 [24.2 + ln T (h) − ln (ν)] , (13) At disk center, we can set the altitude h equal to the line-of-sight coordinate z, so that the free-free opacity τf f (h, ν) integrated along the line-of-sight h = z is, τf f (h, ν) = Z h −∞ κf f (h′, ν) dh′ , (14) and the radio brightness temperature TB(ν) is then TB(ν) = Z 0 −∞ T (h) exp−τf f (h,ν) κf f (h, ν)dh . (15) With this simple model we can determine the mean temperature T (h) by fitting the observed brightness temperature spectra TB(ν) to the theoretical spectra (Eq.15) by varying the temperature T (h) = const (in Eqs.13-14). The expected brightness temperature spectra for an isothermal corona with temperatures of T = 1.0 MK and T = 5.0 MK and a base density of n0 = 109 cm−3 are shown in Fig.8. We see that the corona becomes optically thin (TB ≪ Te) at frequencies of ν > ∼ 1 − 2 GHz in this temperature range that is typical for the Quiet Sun. These hydrostatic models in the lower corona, however, have been criticized because of the presence of dynamic phenomena, such as spicu- lae, which may contribute to an extended chromosphere in the statisti- cal average. The spicular extension of this dynamic chromosphere has been probed with high-resolution measurements of the Normal Inci- dence X-Ray Telescope (NIXT) (Daw, DeLuca, & Golub 1995) as well as with radio submillimeter observations during a total eclipse (Ewell et al. 1993). Using the radio limb height measurements at various mm and sub-mm wavelengths in the range of 200-3000 µm (Roellig et al. 1991; Horne et al. 1981; Wannier et al. 1983; Belkora et al. 1992; Ewell et al. 1993), an empirical Caltech Irreference Chromospheric Model (CICM) was established, which fits the observed limb heights between 500 km and 5000 km in a temperature regime of T = 4410 K to T = 7500 K (Ewell et al. 1993), shown in Fig.9. We see that these radio limb fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.16 10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 ] K M [ B T . p m e t s s e n t h g i r B 0.001 0.1 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 17 1.0 Frequency ν[GHz] 10.0 100.0 Figure 8. Quiet Sun brightness temperature spectrum for an isothermal corona with T = 1.0 MK (solid line) or T = 5.0 MK (dashed line) with a base density of n0 = 109 cm−3. measurements yield electron densities that are 1-2 orders of magnitude higher in the height range of 500-5000 km than predicted by hydrostatic models (VAL, FAL, Gabriel 1976), which was interpreted in terms of the dynamic nature of spiculae (Ewell et al. 1993). This enhanced density in the extended chromosphere has also been corroborated with recent RHESSI measurements (Fig.8; Aschwanden, Brown, & Kontar 2002). Hard X-rays mainly probe the total neutral and ionized hydrogen density that governs the bremsstrahlung and the total bound and free electron density in collisional energy losses, while the electron density ne(h) inferred from the radio-based measurements is based on free- free emission, and shows a remarkably good agreement in the height range of h ≈ 1000 − 3000 km. The extended chromosphere produces substantially more opacity at microwave frequencies than hydrostatic models (e.g. Gabriel 1976). The atmospheric structure thus needs to be explored with more general parameterizations of the density ne(h) and temperature Te(h) structure than hydrostatic models provide. For instance, each of the atmospheric models shown in Fig.9 provides different functions ne(h) and Te(h). Observational tests of these models can simply be made by forward-fitting of the parameterized height-dependent density ne(h) and temperature profiles Te(h), using the expressions for free-free emis- sion (Eqs.13-15). In Fig.10 we illustrate this with an example. The datapoints (shown as diamonds in Fig.10) represent radio observations of the solar limb at frequencies of ν = 1.4 − 18 GHz during the solar minimum in 1986-87 by Zirin, Baumert, & Hurford (1991). We show in Fig.10 an isothermal hydrostatic model for a coronal temperature of Te = 1.5 MK and a base density of ne = 109 cm−3, as well as the hydrostatic model of Gabriel (1976), of which the density profile fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.17 18 1018 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA ] 3 - m c [ e n y t i s n e d n o r t c e e l d n a 0 H n n e g o r d y h l a r t u e N Neutral hydrogen density ME MM D FAL-C VAL-C O FAL-P Gu 1016 1014 Gu VAL-C FAL-C D FAL-P 1012 Electron density MM ME O 1010 108 100 50 keV 45 keV 40 keV 35 keV 30 keV 25 keV 20 keV 15 keV RHESSI Flare loop CICM Radio limb Gabriel Corona 10000 1000 Altitude h[km] Figure 9. A compilation of chromospheric and coronal density models: VAL-C = Vernazza, Avrett, & Loeser (1981), model C; FAL-C = Fontenla, Avrett, & Loeser (1990), model C; FAL-P = Fontenla, Avrett, & Loeser (1990), model P; G = Gu, Jefferies et al. (1997); MM = Maltby et al., (1986), model M; ME = Maltby et al., (1986), model E; D = Ding & Fang (1989); O = Obridko & Staude (1988); Gabriel = Gabriel (1976), coronal model; CICM = Caltech Irreference Chromo- spheric Model, radio sub-millimeter limb observations (Ewell et al. 1993), RHESSI flare loop (Aschwanden, Brown, & Kontar 2002). ne(h) is shown in Fig.9. The Gabriel model was calculated based on the expansion of the magnetic field of coronal flux tubes over the area of a supergranule (canopy geometry). The geometric expansion factor and the densities at the lower boundary in the transition region (given by the chromospheric VAL and FAL models, see Fig.9) then constrains the coronal density model ne(h), which falls off exponentially with height in an isothermal fluxtube in hydrostatic equilibrium. We see that the Gabriel model roughly matches the isothermal hydrostatic model (see Fig.10), but does not exactly match the observations by Zirin et al. (1991). However, if we multiply the Gabriel model by a factor of 0.4, to adjust for solar cycle minimum conditions, and add a temperature of fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.18 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 19 10.00 1.00 Isothermal 0.10 Gabriel*0.4+Tch ] K M [ B T . p m e t s s e n t h g i r B Gabriel Zirin 0.01 0.1 1.0 Frequency ν[GHz] 10.0 Figure 10. Quiet Sun brightness temperature spectrum for an isothermal corona with T = 1.5 MK with a base density of n0 = 109 cm−3 (solid thin line), for the coronal model by Gabriel (1976) (thin solid line), and for a modified Gabriel model (thick solid line). Te = 11, 000 K to account for an optically thick chromosphere (similar to the values determined by Bastian, Dulk, and Leblanc 1996), we find a reasonably good fit to the observations of Zirin (thick curve in Fig.10). This example demonstrates that radio spectra in the frequency range of ν ≈ 1 − 10 GHz are quite sensitive to probe the physical structure of the chromosphere and transition region. 4. FUTURE FASR SCIENCE With our study we illustrated some basic applications of frequency tomography as can be expected from FASR data. We demonstrated how physical parameters from coronal loops in active regions, from the Quiet-Sun corona, and from the chromosphere and transition region can be retrieved. Based on these capabilities we expect that the following science goals can be efficiently studied with future FASR data: 1. The electron density ne(s) and electron temperature profile Te(s) of individual active region loops can be retrieved, which constrain the heating function EH (s) along the loop in the momentum and energy balance hydrodynamic equations. This enables us to test whether a loop is in hydrostatic equilibrium or evolves in a dy- namic manner. Detailed dynamic studies of the time-dependent heating function EH (s, t) may reveal the time scales of intermittent plasma heating processes, which can be used to constrain whether AC or DC heating processes control energy dissipation. Ultimately, such quantitative studies will lead to the determination and iden- tification of the so far unknown physical heating mechanisms, a fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.19 20 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA long-thought goal of the so-called coronal heating problem. Radio diagnostic is most sensitive to cool dense plasma, but is also sen- sitive continuously up to the highest temperatures, and this way nicely complements EUV and soft X-ray diagnostic. 2. Because coronal loops are direct tracers of closed coronal mag- netic field lines, the reconstruction of the 3D geometry of loops, as it can be mapped out with multi-frequency data from FASR in a tomographic manner, this information can be used to test theoretical models based on magnetic field extrapolations from the photosphere. The circular polarization of free-free emission contains additional information on the magnetic field (Grebinskij et al. 2000; Gelfreikh 2002; Brosius 2002), as well as gyroresonance emission provides direct measurements of the magnetic field by its propor- tionality to the gyrofrequency (Lee et al. 1998; White 2002; Ryabov 2002). Ultimately, such studies may constrain the non-potentiality and the localization of currents in the corona. 3. The density ne(h) and temperature profile Te(h) of the chromo- sphere, transition region, and corona can be determined in the Quiet Sun from brightness temperature spectra TB(ν), with least confusion at disk center. Parameterized models of the density and temperature structure, additionally constrained by the hydrody- namic equations and differential emission measure distributions, can be forward-fitted to the observed radio brightness temperature spectra TB(ν). This provides a new tool to probe physical condi- tions in the transition region, deviations from hydrostatic equilib- ria, and diagnostic of dynamic processes (flows, turbulence, waves, heating, cooling) in this little understood interface to the corona. 4. Since free-free emission is most sensitive to cool dense plasma, FASR data will also be very suitable to study the origin, evolution, destabilization, and eruption of filaments, which seem to play a cru- cial role in triggering and onset of coronal mass ejections (Vourlidas 2002). Ultimately, the information to forecast CMEs may be chiefly exploited from the early evolution of filaments. Previous studies with multi-frequency instruments (VLA, OVRO, Nan- ¸cay, RATAN-600) allowed only crude attempts to pioneer tomographic 3D-modeling of the solar corona, because of the limitations of a rel- atively small number of Fourier components and a sparse number of frequencies. FASR will be the optimum instrument to faciliate 3D di- agnostic of the solar corona on a routine basis, which is likely to lead to groundbreaking discoveries in long-standing problems of coronal plasma physics. fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.20 FASR CORONAL TOMOGRAPHY 21 References Altschuler,M.D. 1979, in Image Reconstruction from Projections, (ed. G.T.Herman, Berlin:Springer, p.105 Aschwanden,M.J. and Bastian,T.S. 1994a, Astrophys.J. 426, 425 Aschwanden,M.J. and Bastian,T.S. 1994b, Astrophys.J. 426, 434 Aschwanden,M.J., Lim,J., Gary,D.E., and Klimchuk,J.A. 1995, Astrophys.J. 454, 512 Aschwanden,M.J., Newmark,J.S., Delaboudiniere,J.P., Neupert,W.M., Klim- chuk,J.A., Gary,G.A., Portier-Fornazzi,F., and Zucker,A. 1999, Astrophys.J. 515, 842 Aschwanden,M.J., Alexander,D., Hurlburt,N., Newmark,J.S., Neupert,W.M., Klim- chuk,J.A., and G.A.Gary 2000a, Astrophys.J. 531, 1129 Aschwanden,M.J., Nightingale,R.W., and Alexander,D. 2000b, Astrophys.J. 541, 1059 Aschwanden,M.J. and Schrijver,K.J. 2002, Astrophys.J.Suppl.Ser. 142, 269 Aschwanden,M.J., Brown,J.C., and Kontar,E.P. 2002, Solar Phys. (in press) Bastian,T.S. 1994, Astrophys.J. 426, 774 Bastian,T.S. 1995, Astrophys.J. 439, 494 Bastian,T.S., Dulk,G.A., and Leblanc,Y. 1996, Astrophys.J. 473, 539 Batchelor,D.A. 1994, Solar Phys. 155, 57 Belkora,L., Hurford,G.J., Gary,D.E. and Woody,D.P. 1992, Astrophys.J. 400, 692 Berton.R. and Sakurai,T. 1985, Solar Phys. 96, 93 Bogod,V.M., and Grebinskij,A.S. 1997, Solar Phys. 176, 67 Brosius,J.W. 2002, (in this volume) Davila,J.M. 1994, Astrophys.J. 423, 871 Daw,A., DeLuca,E.E., and Golub,L. 1995, Astrophys.J. 453, 929 Ding, M.D. and Fang, C. 1989, Astron.Astrophys. 225, 204. Ewell, M.W.Jr., Zirin, H., Jensen, J.B., and Bastian, T.S. 1993, Astrophys.J. 403, 426. Fontenla, J.M., Avrett, E.H., and Loeser, R. 1990, Astrophys.J. 355, 700. Gabriel, A.H. 1976, Royal Society (London), Philosophical Transactions, Series A, 281, no. 1304, p. 339. Gary,A., Davis,J.M., and Moore,R. 1998, Solar Phys. 183, 45 Gelfreikh,G.B. 2002, (in this volume) Grebinskij,A., Bogod,V., Gelfreikh,G., Urpo,S., Pohjolainen,S. and Shibasaki,K. 2000, Astron.Astrophys.Suppl.Ser. 144, 169 Gu, Y., Jefferies, J.T., Lindsey, C. and Avrett, E.H. 1997, Astrophys.J. 484, 960. Horne, K., Hurford, G.J., Zirin, H., and DeGraauw, Th. 1981, Astrophys.J. 244, 340. Hurlburt,N.E., Martens,P,C.H., Slater,G.L., and Jaffey,S.M. 1994, in Solar Active Region Evolution: Comparing Models with Observations, ASP Conf. Ser. 68, 30 Lang,K.R. 1980, Astrophysical Formulae. A Compendium for the Physicist and Astrophysicist, Berlin: Springer Lee,J.W., McClymont,A.N., Mikic,Z., White,S.M., and Kundu,M.R. 1998, Astro- phys.J. 501, 853 Koutchmy,S., and Molodensky,M.M. 1992, Nature 360, 717 Koutchmy,S., Merzlyakov, V. L., and Molodensky, M. M. 2001, Astronomy Reports 45/10, 834 Liewer,P.C., Hall,J.R., DeJong,M., Socker,D.G., Howard,R.A., Crane,P.C., Reiser,P., Rich,N., Vourlidas,A. 2001, J.Geophys.Res. 106/A8, 15903 fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.21 22 ASCHWANDEN, ALEXANDER, & DEROSA Maltby, P., Avrett, E.H., Carlsson, M., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., Kurucz, R.L., and Loeser, R. 1986, Astrophys.J. 306, 284. Nitta,N., VanDriel-Gestelyi,L., and Harra-Murnion,L,K. 1999, Solar Phys. 189, 181 Obridko, V.N. and Staude, J. 1988, Astron.Astrophys. 189, 232. Roellig, T.L., Becklin, E.E., Jefferies, J.T., Kopp, G.A., Lindsey, C.A., Orral, F.Q., and Werner, M.W., 1991, Astrophys.J. 381, 288. Ryabov,V.B. 2002, (in this volume) Vernazza, J.E., Avrett, E.H., and Loeser, R. 1981, Astrophys.J.Suppl.Ser. 45, 635. Vourlidas,A. 2002, (in this volume) Wannier, P.G., Hurford, G.J., and Seielstad, G.A. 1983, Astrophys.J. 264, 660. White,S.M. 2002, (in this volume) Zidowitz,S. 1999, J.Geophys.Res. 104/A5, 9727 Zirin,H., Baumert,B.M., and Hurford,G.J. 1991, Astrophys.J. 370, 779 fasr.tex; 24/11/2018; 9:51; p.22
astro-ph/0108354	1	0108	2001-08-22T14:12:25	The stability of the Circumnuclear Disk clouds in the Galactic Centre	[ "astro-ph" ]	The influence of rotation and magnetic fields on the physical properties of isothermal gas clouds is discussed. The presence of rotation and/or magnetic fields results in an increase of the critical cloud mass with respect to gravitational instability for clouds of a given temperature and external pressure. Rotating clouds have higher densities. Consequently, they are more stable against tidal shear than non-rotating clouds. They can approach the Galactic Centre up to a radius of ~2 pc without being disrupted by the tidal shear due to the gravitational potential. For smaller radii the clouds either collapse or become tidally disrupted. We suggest that this mechanism is responsible for the formation of the inner edge of the Circumnuclear Disk in the Galactic Centre.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) 1 0 0 2 g u A 2 2 1 v 4 5 3 8 0 1 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a The stability of the Circumnuclear Disk clouds in the Galactic Centre B. Vollmer1 , 2 and W.J. Duschl2 , 1 1 Max-Planck-Institut fur Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany. 2 Institut fur Theoretische Astrophysik der Universitat Heidelberg, Tiergartenstrasse 15, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany. Received / Accepted Abstract. The influence of rotation and magnetic fields on the physical properties of isothermal gas clouds is discussed. The presence of rotation and/or magnetic fields results in an increase of the critical cloud mass with respect to gravitational instability for clouds of a given temperature and external pressure. Rotating clouds have higher densities. Consequently, they are more stable against tidal shear than non-rotating clouds. They can approach the Galactic Centre up to a radius of ∼2 pc without being disrupted by the tidal shear due to the gravitational potential. For smaller radii the clouds either collapse or become tidally disrupted. We suggest that this mechanism is responsible for the formation of the inner edge of the Circumnuclear Disk in the Galactic Centre. Key words. ISM: clouds -- ISM: evolution -- Galaxy: center 1. Introduction The Galactic Centre1 is surrounded by a large number of gas and dust clouds. The distribution and the kine- matics of these clouds are generally interpreted as a thick disk (Circumnuclear Disk CND). Whether this disk -- like structure has an outer edge is still a matter of debate. The CND was studied in molecular lines by Gatley et al. (1986) (H2), Serabyn et al. (1986) (CO, CS), Gusten et al. (1987) (HCN), DePoy et al. (1989) (H2), Sutton et al. (1990) (CO), Jackson et al. (1993) (HCN), and Marr, Wright, & Backer (1993) (HCN), Coil & Ho (1999, 2000) (NH3), Wright et al. (2001) (HCN). The disk has a sharply defined inner edge at a radius of ∼1.7 pc. Inside this radius the gas density drops by more than one or- der of magnitude. Gusten et al. (1987) suggested that the density of the clouds is not high enough to resist tidal shear due to the centre's strong gravitational field. Therefore, they concluded that the CND is a very short lived structure (∼ 105 yr). On the other hand, Jackson et al. (1993) pointed out that the possibility should not be dismissed that the clouds' density is even high enough to stabilize individual gas clouds against tidal disruption (n ∼ 107 cm−3). In a previous paper (Vollmer & Duschl 2001; hereafter VD2001) we constructed an analytic model for a clumped gas and dust disk and applied it to the Send offprint requests to: B. Vollmer, e-mail: bvollmer@mpifr- bonn.mpg.de 1 We assume 8.5 kpc for the distance to the Galactic Centre. CND. The clouds were treated as isothermal selfgravitat- ing spheres with a given outer pressure. We succeeded in reproducing the main characteristics of the observed gas clouds (mass, central density, density at the outer bound- ary). A major shortcoming of this model was that these clouds could not resist tidal shear at distances smaller than ∼2.5 pc from the Galactic Centre. In this work we investigate the influence of rotation on the cloud proper- ties and their stability against tidal shear. 2. Basic Picture As in VD2001 we assume that during a short accretion event (∆t ∼ 106 yr) an amount of gas of several 104 M⊙ is driven into the Galactic Centre region to distances less than 10 pc. The infalling gas has not a uniform density distribution and might be turbulent. This clumpy medium is exposed to the ambient UV radiation field due to the population of young O/B stars in the Galactic Centre. Low density regions of the infalling gas are evaporated rapidly while regions of higher density stay molecular and are heated to an equilibrium temperature during less than an orbital period. In this way a clumpy circumnuclear disk is formed. We assume that the clouds are gravitationally stable. Three kinds of pressure can counterbalance the selfgravitation of the clouds: 2 B. Vollmer and W.J. Duschl: The stability of the CND clouds in the GC (i) Turbulent pressure: if the turbulent pressure is dominant, we can estimate the turbulent velocity disper- sion σ with the help of the Virial theorem: σ2 ∼ 2GMcl rcl , (1) is the cloud mass and rcl where Mcl its radius. With Mcl=30 M⊙ and rcl=0.05 pc, the velocity dispersion is σ ∼ 2.3 km s−1 (note that the observed FWHM is two times σ). (ii) Magnetic pressure: in the case of dominant mag- netic pressure, we can estimate an equivalent linewidth c using a local magnetic field strength B=3 mG (Yusef- Zadeh et al. 1996). (2) B2/8π ≃ c2ρcl , where ρcl is the cloud density. With a cloud density of ρcl=3 10−18 g cm−3 we obtain an equivalent linewidth of c ∼ 3.3 km s−1. (iii) Thermal pressure: if the thermal pressure dom- inates, the sound velocity at a temperature of 150 K is cs ∼ 0.8 km s−1. Thus, the linewidth c of a single selfgrav- itating cloud is 1 km s−1 ≤ c ≤ 3 km s−1. The observed linewidths are as large as ∆v = 50 km s−1 (see, e.g., Wright et al. 2001). If the clouds within the CND are gravitationally stable, their intrin- sic linewidth is much smaller. A possible explanation of the large observed linewidths is an enhanced turbulent velocity dispersion between the clouds due to infalling gas streamers and/or superposition of clouds with differ- ent rotational and turbulent velocities (the turbulent ve- locity dispersion of the model disk of VD2001 is of the order ∆v ∼ 15 km s−1). The study of a CS(3 -- 2) data cube observed with the IRAM 30m Telescope (Zylka et al. 1999) indicates that the features of linewidths up to 50 km s−1 might consist of several clouds with small indi- vidual linewidths (∼ 2 km s−1) (Zylka, private communi- cation). In the following we discuss rotating clouds without a magnetic field first. As shown above, the inclusion of a magnetic field increases the equivalent linewidth of the clouds by a factor ∼3. The implications of the inclusion of a magnetic field will be discussed in Sect. 6. 3. Cloud Rotation The equilibrium state of rotating isothermal clouds was studied both analytically (Hayashi, Narita, & Miyama 1982; Tohline 1985a, b) and numerically (Stahler 1983a, b; Kiguchi et al. 1987; Narita et al. 1990). These au- thors showed that the density and the mass of rotating clouds can exceed that of non-rotating clouds consider- ably. Kiguchi et al. (1987) carried out numerical simula- tions of rotating isothermal spheres embedded in a tenuous intercloud medium, i.e. the outer boundary of the cloud is determined by the external pressure. Their calculations (i) M rot crit/M BE did not include a magnetic field. They concluded that a rotating cloud is dynamically stable if crit < 31, where M rot crit is the critical mass for gravitational instability of the rotating cloud and M BE crit is the critical mass for gravitational instability of a non- rotating Bonner -- Ebert sphere with the same sound speed (temperature) and the same outer pressure; (ii) the maximum mean rotation velocity is smaller than 2.7 cs, where cs is the sound velocity; (iii) ρ/ρext < 6, where ρ is the mean density of the cloud and ρext is the external density. Thus, rotating isothermal clouds, which are gravita- tionally stable are denser and more massive than non- rotating clouds of the same temperature embedded in a medium of the same pressure. We conclude that cloud ro- tation alters the solution for the physical characteristics of our model clouds (VD2001) in such a way that more massive and denser clouds result which are more stable against tidal disruption. 4. Specific angular momentum 4.1. Cloud formation The spin angular momentum of a cloud in the CND should reflect the angular momentum of the interstellar medium from which the cloud has formed (see e.g. Blitz 1993). Within the central 10 pc the gravitational potential is ap- proximatly spherical. The rotation curve is determined for distances smaller than approximatelly 1 pc by the gravita- tional potential of the central black hole and for distances greater than this by that of the nuclear star cluster (Genzel et al. 1996). If we consider that a cloud forms when a disk-like region becomes gravitationally unstable and col- lapses, we expect a similar result to that considered ana- lytically by Mestel (1966). Since the rotation curve in the Galactic Centre is approximately constant for distances greater 1 pc and is falling inwards for smaller distances, the rotation of the cloud can be either prograde or ret- rograde depending on the details of the cloud formation. We thus have to estimate the specific angular momen- tum of the ISM at the place of cloud formation. For an isolated CND, VD2001 found a very small, mean, radial drift velocity of the clouds (vdrift < 0.01 km s−1; however, a single cloud can approach the Galactic Centre faster). In this case we can assume that the clouds were formed not far away from the galactic distances where we observe them today (2 pc ≤ RG ≤ 7 pc). Mestel (1966) has shown that a cloud can have a specific angular momentum about its mass-centre up to J/Mcl = 0.5R2Ω, where R is half the size of the collapsed region and Ω is the local angular velocity. Let us consider a cloud which forms at a distance greater than 2 pc from the Galactic Centre. With a typ- ical density in the disk ρ = 2 10−19 g cm−1 and a typical cloud mass of 30 M⊙ (VD2001), the size of the collapsing region is R ≃0.1 pc. The initial value of Ω depends on the details of the collapse. With Ω(2 pc) ≤ 60 km s−1 pc−1 we obtain a specific spin angular momentum of J/M ≤ B. Vollmer and W.J. Duschl: The stability of the CND clouds in the GC 3 0.3 pc km s−1. If the CND is not isolated, the clouds could have formed at higher distances from the Galactic Centre (∼10 pc). Using Ω(10 pc) ∼12 km s−1 pc−1, gives J/M ≤ 6 10−2 pc km s−1. In addition, partially inelastic off-center collisions between the clouds can lead to changes in the spin angular momentum of the clouds. 4.2. Stability criteria Limits on the specific angular momentum of the clouds J/M are given by the onset of bar formation on the one hand and the onset of core collapse on the other hand. Kiguchi et al. (1987) suggested that bar formation occurs for β0 > 1/3, where β0 = 25 12(cid:0) 4π 3 (cid:1) 1 3 1 3 ρ extJ 2 GM 10 3 (3) is the ration of rotational energy to gravitational energy ratio of the cloud. Here ρext is the boundary density of the cloud, J is the angular momentum of the cloud, M its mass, and G the gravitation constant. The criterion for clouds which are stable against bar formation is thus 1 − 1 6 2 2 ρ ext M 3 ∼ 7 10−2 pc km s−1 , J/M ≤ 0.31G where we have used typical cloud parameters (M =30 M⊙, ρext = 3 10−19 g cm−3). Miyama, Hayashi, & Narita (1984) found that rotating isothermal spheres collapse if α0β0 < 0.2, where (4) α0 = 5 2(cid:0) 4π 3 (cid:1)− 1 3 c2 s Gρ 1 3 extM 2 3 (5) is the thermal to gravitational energy of the cloud. The criterion for stable clouds thus is J/M ≥ 0.2 GM cs ∼ 5 10−2 pc km s−1 , (6) using the cloud parameters from above and cs=1 km s−1. In Sect. 6 it is shown that the presence of magnetic fields with a field strength of several mG results in an effective linewidth of c ∼ 3 km s−1. In this case the specific angular momentum is GM c ∼ 2 10−2 pc km s−1 , J/M ≥ 0.2 We thus conclude that for a stable rotating cloud 2 10−2 ≤ J/M ≤ 7 10−2 pc km s−1. This is consistent with the upper limits 6 10−2 ≤ J/M ≤ 0.3 pc km s−1 at the moment of cloud formation (Sect. 4.1). (7) 5. A typical rotating cloud The maximum central density ρc of an isothermal cloud with external pressure Pext (Bonner -- Ebert sphere) is ρc/ρ∗ = 14, where ρ∗ = c−2 s Pext. Stable rotating isother- mal clouds can have central densities up to ρc/ρ∗ ∼ 100. − 1 2 s P ext G− 3 Fig. 14 of Kiguchi et al. (1987) shows the region of sta- ble clouds as a function of the central density and the cloud mass. In our case M∗ = c4 2 =15 M⊙ and ρ∗ = 10−18 g cm−3. Since we are interested in rotating clouds that have higher central densities than non-rotating clouds, we will only discuss the region for ρc/ρ∗ > 14. In this case our region of interest is limited by the dashed col- lapse curve and the dash-dotted curve for bar formation in Fig. 14 of Kiguchi et al. (1987). A typical cloud in this ∼ 3(cid:0)ρc/ρ∗(cid:1)BE region has M/M∗ ∼ 2 − 3 or (cid:0)ρc/ρ∗(cid:1)rot . Such a cloud has the following physical characteristics (Kiguchi et al. 1987; Table 3): β0 = 0.16, ρc/ρ∗ = 30, M/M∗ = 2.38, csJ/(GM 2) = 0.164, ρ/ρ∗ = 2.71. In physical units this gives: M =36 M⊙, ρ = 2.7 10−18 g cm−3, ρc = 3 10−17 g cm−3. The radius perpendicular to the ro- tation axis is re = 8 10−2 pc and parallel to the rotation axis z = 3 10−2 pc. The maximum mean rotation velocity is vrot ∼ 0.8 km s−1. This cloud has thus a 3 times higher central density than a non-rotating isothermal selfgravitating sphere of the same temperature which is embedded in a tenuous medium of the same outer pressure. The clouds are illuminated by the UV radiation field coming from the central He i star cluster. The mass loss rate of these clouds due to outflowing ionized gas is ap- proximately M ∼ 4πr2 clρclci, where rcl is the cloud radius and ci is the sound velocity in the external ionized gas. cl < 2 × dBE Since for the diameter of such a cloud drot , rotation lowers the lifetime of a cloud by a factor smaller than 4. The minimum lifetime is still greater than 107 yr. cl 6. Magnetic fields Tomisaka et al. (1989) studied the structure of selfgravita- tionally stable magnetized clouds. They showed that the critical mass for stability is Mmag ∼ 1.18(cid:16)1 − (cid:0) G 1 0.17 2dMcl/dΦBc(cid:1)2(cid:17)− 3 2 MBE , (8) cl/2(cid:1)−1 where dMcl/dΦBc represents the mass-to-magnetic flux ratio at the center and MBE is the Bonner -- Ebert criti- cal mass in the absence of magnetic fields. If we approxi- mate dMcl/dΦBc ≃ Mcl(cid:0)Br2 and let Mcl =30 M⊙, rcl=0.05 pc, and B=5 mG, we obtain Mmag ∼ 2.5MBE. This is consistent with a realistic Bonner -- Ebert mass of MBE ∼ 10 M⊙ (VD2001). We would thus expect that the density of a magnetized cloud of size dcl=0.1 pc, mass Mcl=30 M⊙, and magnetic field strength B of several mG would also show a density enhancement of a factor 3 with respect to a non-rotating, non-magnetized isothermal, self- gravitating cloud. 4 B. Vollmer and W.J. Duschl: The stability of the CND clouds in the GC c We have argued in the previous Sections that for a typical rotating or magnetized cloud ρrot/mag ∼ 3 × ρBE (Fig. 1 dashed line). The presence of rotation and/or mag- netic fields alters the properties of the cloud, i.e. they are more massive and have higher central densities. The crit- ical Galactic radius thus decreases to Rcrit ∼ 2 pc. In the framework of our model and its approximations, this is in agreement with the observed inner edge of the CND at RG ∼ 1.7 pc. The dependence of the inner edge on the UV radiation field will be discussed in Sect. 9. c 8. The influence of the stellar winds The stellar wind emanating from the central Hei star clus- ter which is responsible for the UV radiation field exerts a ram pressure on the illuminated side of the cloud: Pram ≃ 2.5 10−8 ( M /3 10−3 M⊙ yr−1)(v/600 km s−1) 4 π (R/2 pc)2 erg cm−3 ,(10) (Yusef-Zadeh & Wardle 1993), where M is the stellar mass loss rate due to a wind of velocity v. The energy density due to the selfgravity of the cloud is given by (Mcl/30 M⊙)G erg cm−3 ,(11) (rcl/0.05 pc) Pgrav ≃ 5 10−8 (ncl/106 cm−3) where Mcl and rcl are the cloud mass and mean ra- dius. Ram pressure is thus able to push the ionized and heated gas (ni ∼ several 103 cm−3) radially away from the Galactic Centre, and might even shape the neutral con- densations at the inner edge of the CND. It represents an additional external force on the illuminated side of clouds at the inner edge of the CND. 9. The inner edge of a CND If we assume a spectrum of clouds moving around a galac- tic centre forming a disk-like equilibrium structure, there are four effects that determine the physical properties of the clouds: UV radiation, tidal shear, a radially-directed wind, and selfgravitation. In the following considerations we will neglect the effects of stellar winds. Nevertheless, one has to keep in mind that they can provide an addi- tional external pressure on the clouds at the inner edge of the CND. Only those clouds with a sufficiently high cen- tral density can resist tidal disruption. Thus, the clouds' mean density must increase with decreasing distance to the Galactic Centre. If they reach the Jeans mass they be- come gravitationally unstable and collapse. Taking these two effects together we obtain an efficient mechanism to create an inner edge. At this distance, the clouds that can resist tidal disruption become Jeans unstable, i.e. the dense cloud structure is lost. The UV radiation plays an important role in determining the radius of the clouds at each distance from the galactic centre. With an increas- ing UV radiation field the cloud radius decreases, because the ionization front in direction of the central star cluster is located at smaller cloud radii (Dyson 1968). At these Fig. 1. Central density of the clouds as a function of the distance from the Galactic Centre. Solid: critical den- sity for tidal disruption. Dotted: model central density of VD2001. Dashed line: central density of a rotating cloud. Dashed surface: range of densities where clouds are grav- itationally and tidally stable. 7. Tidal shear The critical density for a cloud orbiting at a distance R on a circular orbit around a point mass M below which it will disintegrate due to tidal shear is given by ρcrit = 3 2π M R3 (9) (see e.g. Stark et al. 1989). We approximate the mass distribution in the Galactic Centre by M (R) = M0 + M1 R1.25, where M0 = 3 106 M⊙ an M1 = 1.6 106 M⊙ pc−1.25 (this is close to the findings of Eckart & Genzel (1996)). The obtained critical density can be compared to the model density of VD2001 (Fig. 1). For these clouds only selfgravitation and thermal pressure of the neutral and ionized gas are taken into account. Since our model clouds are on the edge of gravitational insta- bility, their central density is close to the critical density for gravitational collapse (Fig. 1 dotted line). As long as this central density is higher than the critical central den- sity with respect to tidal shear (Fig. 1 solid line), non- rotating isothermal clouds can exist. The crossing of the curves corresponds thus to the minimum distance where stable clouds can exist. This critical Galactic radius is Rcrit ∼ 3.5 pc for this estimate. More detailed calcula- tions show Rcrit ∼ 2.5 pc for the illuminated side and Rcrit ≤ 3.5 pc for the shadowed side. This difference is due to the different mechanisms that create the cloud boundary at the illuminated and shadowed side. At the illuminated side, the density of the ionized gas is given by the ionization -- recombination equilibrium. The heated and ionized gas flows away from the cloud and fills the space between the clouds. In this way, a low density ion- ized interclump medium (ne ∼ 103 cm−3) is built up. The external pressure of this interclump medium is responsible for the outer edge of the cloud at the shadowed side. B. Vollmer and W.J. Duschl: The stability of the CND clouds in the GC 5 radii the enhanced pressure of the ionized gas in the ion- ization front is counterbalanced by the enhanced thermal pressure due to the increasing density of the neutral gas in the isothermal cloud. Thus the cloud mass decreases with increasing UV radiation field and the cloud is less susceptible to gravitational collapse. We can estimate this effect quantitatively in the fol- lowing way. In the case of a cloud with uniform density the maximum density needed to stabilize a cloud against tidal forces is ρtidal crit = 3 2π M (R) R3 , (12) where M (R) is the enclosed mass up to the radius R from the Galactic Centre. The criterion for Jeans instability is given by ρJeans crit = πRT Gµr2 cl , (13) where T is the temperature of the cloud, R is the gas constant, G is the gravitational constant, and µ is the molecular weight. The cloud radius due to the balance of ionization and recombination is given by Dyson (1968) rcl = ξ2J0n−2 i , (14) where J0 is the number of incident UV photons per cm2 is the number density of the ionized gas in and s, ni the ionization front, and ξ = 4.87 106 cm− 3 2 . With the jump condition across the ionization front ρcle−uc2 s = 2ρic2 i , where ρi and ci are the density and the sound ve- locity of the external ionized gas and u(x) is a parameter of the Lane-Emden equation, one can write 2 s 1 rcl = 4ξ2m2 pJ0ρ−2 cl e2u( ci cs )4 . (15) Furthermore, one can approximate the function e−u(x) ∼ 3x−2 for 2 < x < 8, where x = rcl/cs√4πGρc. This leads to Fig. 2. Central density of the heavy clouds versus the distance to the Galactic Centre. Dashed line: maximum central density above which gravitational collapse occurs. Solid line: minimum density in order to resist tidal shear. Dashed surface: range of densities where clouds are grav- itationally and tidally stable. In Fig. 2 the dashed line shows the maximum central den- sity above which gravitational collapse occurs (ρJeans crit using Eq. 16), the solid line shows the minimum density in or- der to resist tidal shear (ρtidal crit ). The dashed surface shows the range of densities where clouds are gravitationally and tidally stable. The inner edge of the CND arises thus nat- urally as a selection effect due to external conditions of the environment on the cloud spectrum. If there are non-negligible non-thermal pressure com- ponents, we have to add these components to the sound speed of the neutral and ionized gas. For a non-thermal linewidth c > 1 km s−1, the critical Jeans density is always lower than the critical tidal density, i.e. no stable clouds can exist. Therefore, we suggest that only rotating clouds, which have a higher central density can survive. rcl = 3.645 1015J − 1 3 0 − 4 3 i c 8 3 s c . (16) 9.1. A possible scenario for star formation 1 1 8 Thus, the cloud radius depends only on the number of in- cident UV photons, the sound speed of the ionized gas, and the sound speed of the neutral gas. If we assume that the temperature is determined by the radiation field cs ∝ T 0 , the cloud radius does not change with the cloud's distance to the Galactic Centre. This means that the cloud's radius is constant and does not depend on its central density. Consequently, the critical Jeans density ρJeans is proportional to the gas temperature of the neu- crit tral gas. 2 ∝ J Fig. 2 shows the critical densities with respect to tidal shear and gravitational collapse. These graphs represent an approximation of the density variations calculated from the detailed model of VD2001 (Fig. 1). The increase or de- crease of the neutral gas temperature by a factor 2 results in a variation of the location of the inner edge of ±1 pc. In the previous Sections we have investigated an isolated clumpy gas disk. However, the CND appears to interact with the surrounding gas. Coil & Ho (1999, 2000) and Zylka et al. (1999) conclude on the basis of the gas distri- bution and kinematics in the inner 20 pc of the Galactic Centre that there are connections between the CND and the neighbouring GMCs. They claim that there are several streamers that fall into the Galactic Centre. From the theoretical point of view Sanders (1998) pointed out the possibility that the CND can be under- stood in terms of tidal capture and disruption of gas clouds falling into the Galactic Centre region. The infalling gas forms a tidally stretched filament intersecting itself. After several rotation periods the gas forms a stable ring struc- ture which can be maintained for more than 106 yr. He showed that the central star cluster can be created within 6 B. Vollmer and W.J. Duschl: The stability of the CND clouds in the GC the first few passages of the cloud when the long filament intersects itself at a large angle. We will now discuss what happens when a cloud com- plex falls from a distance greater than 10 pc into the Galactic Centre. In VD2001 we have shown that the CND has a life- time of ∼ 107 yr. It is thus possible that an external cloud is falling into the Galactic Centre within this period. We propose a new scenario in which a whole cloud complex is falling into the Galactic Centre where a clumpy disk structure already exists. When the cloud hits the CND, frequent partially inelastic cloud -- cloud collisions will cre- ate a whole transient spectrum of clouds with different masses. Those clouds which have masses above the Jeans limit will collapse and eventually form stars. The massive stars are thus formed within a very short time during the collision of the cloud complex and the disk. Partially in- elastic collisions result in a decrease of the cloud velocities. Low velocity clouds (v < vrot ∼ 120 km s−1) form stars and approach the Galactic Centre at the same time. Thus, if an external gas cloud collides with a pre-existing CND, we expect that a part of the gas, which loses angular mo- mentum due to cloud -- cloud collisions spirals inwards with a velocity of ∼100 km s−1. If we assume an initial He i star mass of M0 = 30 M⊙ with an initial velocity of V0 = 100 km s−1, falling into an already existing old stellar cluster of density ρstellar = 4 106 M⊙pc−3 with stellar masses around 1 M⊙, collective relaxation dominates over the particle-particle relaxation (Saslaw 1985). This leads to a relaxation time of cated in the Circumnuclear Disk in the Galactic Centre. Rotating selfgravitating isothermal clouds of a given tem- perature T embedded in a tenuous medium giving rise to an external pressure Pext are more massive and have larger densities than non-rotating clouds of same T and Pext. Stable rotating clouds have an angular momentum in the range 3 10−2 ≤ J/M ≤ 5 10−2 pc km s−1. This rep- resents ∼20% -- 100% of the maximum specific angular mo- mentum that a cloud can acquire during its formation. These clouds are stable against tidal shear for Galactic Radii RG ≥ 2 pc. Magnetized selfgravitating isothermal clouds with magnetic field strengths of several mG have a critical mass with respect to gravitational collapse of ∼3 times the corresponding Bonner -- Ebert critical mass of a selfgravitating isothermal sphere. We suggest a mechanism for the formation of an inner edge in circumnuclear disks. The external UV radiation field determines the diameter of the clouds. The density of the clouds must increase with decreasing galactic radius because of the tidal shear due to the gravitational poten- tial in the Galactic Centre. At a critical radius clouds that are stable against tidal shear become gravitational unsta- ble and collapse. On the basis of our model, selfgravitating non-magnetized isothermal clouds should rotate in order to resist tidal shear at a distance of 2 pc from the Galactic Centre, whereas magnetized clouds must rotate in order to resist tidal shear. For the CND in the Galactic Centre the critical radius corresponds approximately to the ob- served inner edge if cloud rotation is included. We suggest that the central Hei star cluster has been formed when an external cloud collided with a pre-existing CND. τR,coll = 7 106×(cid:16) V0 100 km s−1(cid:17)3(cid:16) M0 30 M⊙ (cid:17)−1(cid:16) ρstellar 4 106 M⊙ pc3 (cid:17)−1 yr .(17) Acknowledgements. We would like to thank P. Ho for helping us to improve this article significantly. A single massive star, whose velocity is approximately the Keplerian velocity of gas moving on circular orbits around the Galactic Centre, thus loses the information about its initial position and velocity within ∼7 106 yr. Gerhard (2000) estimated that a star cluster of ∼ 105 M⊙ which is formed at a Galactic radius RG=10 pc needs several Myr to spiral into the Galactic Centre. This timescale is comparable to our collective relaxation timescale. The star cluster relaxation time is thus comparable to the lifetime of the Hei stars. These massive stars are formed at the same time and at the same distance to the Galactic Centre forming a star cluster after a few million years. The observed streaming motions of the Hei stars in the Galactic Centre (Genzel et al. 1996) shows that the star cluster is not completely relaxed. Therefore, it is possible that the central Hei star cluster has been built during the collision of an infalling cloud complex with an already existing CND. 10. Conclusion References Blitz L., 1993, in: Protostars and Planets III, University of Arizona Press, p. 125 Coil A.L. & Ho P.T.P., 1999, ApJ, 513, 752 Coil A.L. & Ho P.T.P., 2000, ApJ, 533, 245 DePoy D.L., Gatley I., McLean I.S., 1989, IAU-Symp. 136, 361 Dyson J.E., 1968, ApSS 1, 388 Eckart A., Genzel R., 1996, Nature 383, 415 Gatley I., Jones J.J., Hyland A.R. et al., 1986, MNRAS 222, 299 Genzel R., Thatte N., Krabbe A. et al., 1996, ApJ 472, 153 Gerhard O., 2000, ApJ, in press Gusten R., Genzel R., Wright M.C.H. et al., 1987, ApJ 318, 124 Hayashi C., Narita S., & Miyama S.M., 1982, Prog. Theor. Phys., Osaka, 68, 1949 Jackson J.M., Geis N., Genzel R. et al., 1993, ApJ 402, 173 Kiguchi M., Narita S., Miyama S.M., & Hayashi C., 1987, ApJ, 317, 830 Marr J.M., Wright M.C.H., Backer D.C., 1993, ApJ 411, 667 Mestel L., 1966, MNRAS, 131, 307 Narita S., Kiguchi M., Miyama S.M., & Hayashi C., 1990, 244, We investigated the influence of rotation and magnetic fields on the physical properties of the gas clouds lo- 349 Sanders R.H., 1998, MNRAS, 1998, 294 B. Vollmer and W.J. Duschl: The stability of the CND clouds in the GC 7 Serabyn E., Gusten R., Walmsley C.M. et al., 1986, A&A 169, 85 Stahler S.W., 1983a, ApJ, 268, 155 Stahler S.W., 1983b, ApJ, 268, 165 Stark A.A., Bally J., Wilson R.W., Pound M.W., 1989, IAU- Symp. 135, 129 Sutton E.C., Danchi W.C., Jaminet P.A., Masson C.R., 1990, ApJ 348, 503 Tohline J.E., 1985a, Icarus, 61, 10 Tohline J.E., 1985b, ApJ, 292, 181 Vollmer B., Duschl W.J., 2001, A&A, 367, 72 (=VD2001) Wright M.C.H., Coil A.L., McGary R.S., Ho P.T.P., & Harris A.I., 2001, ApJ, 551, 254 Yusef-Zadeh F., Wardle M., 1993, ApJ, 405, 584 Yusef-Zadeh F., Roberts D.A., Goss W.M., Frail D.A., & Green A.J., 1996, ApJ, 466, L25 Zylka R., Gusten R., Philipp S. et al., 1999, in: The Central Parsecs of the Galaxy, ed. H. Falke, A. Cotera, W.J. Duschl, F. Melia, & M.J. Rieke, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 186, p.415
astro-ph/0103212	1	0103	2001-03-14T15:51:04	Kinematics of young stars. II. Galactic spiral structure	[ "astro-ph" ]	The young star velocity field is analysed by means of a galactic model which takes into account solar motion, differential galactic rotation and spiral arm kinematics. We use two samples of Hipparcos data, one containing O- and B-type stars and another one composed of Cepheid variable stars. The robustness of our method is tested through careful kinematic simulations. Our results show a galactic rotation curve with a classical value of $A$ Oort constant for the O and B star sample ($A^{\mathrm{OB}} =$ 13.7-13.8 km s$^{-1}$ kpc $^{-1}$) and a higher value for Cepheids ($A^{\mathrm{Cep}} =$ 14.9-16.9 km s$^{-1}$ kpc $^{-1}$, depending on the cosmic distance scale chosen). The second-order term is found to be small, compatible with a zero value. The study of the residuals shows the need for a $K$-term up to a heliocentric distance of 4 kpc, obtaining a value $K = -$(1-3) km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$. The results obtained for the spiral structure from O and B stars and Cepheids show good agreement. The Sun is located relatively near the minimum of the spiral perturbation potential ($\psi_\odot =$ 284-20$\degr$) and very near the corotation circle. The angular rotation velocity of the spiral pattern was found to be $\Omega_{\mathrm{p}} \approx 30$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc $^{-1}$.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) 1 0 0 2 r a M 4 1 1 v 2 1 2 3 0 1 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Kinematics of young stars ⋆ II. Galactic spiral structure D. Fern´andez1, F. Figueras1, and J. Torra1 , 2 1 Departament d'Astronomia i Meteorologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 647, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain 2 IEEC (Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya), Edif. Nexus-104, Gran Capit`a 2-4, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain Received ¡date¿ / Accepted ¡date¿ Abstract. The young star velocity field is analysed by means of a galactic model which takes into account solar motion, differential galactic rotation and spiral arm kinematics. We use two samples of Hipparcos data, one containing O- and B-type stars and another one composed of Cepheid variable stars. The robustness of our method is tested through careful kinematic simulations. Our results show a galactic rotation curve with a classical value of A Oort constant for the O and B star sample (AOB = 13.7-13.8 km s−1 kpc −1) and a higher value for Cepheids (ACep = 14.9-16.9 km s−1 kpc −1, depending on the cosmic distance scale chosen). The second-order term is found to be small, compatible with a zero value. The study of the residuals shows the need for a K-term up to a heliocentric distance of 4 kpc, obtaining a value K = −(1-3) km s−1 kpc−1. The results obtained for the spiral structure from O and B stars and Cepheids show good agreement. The Sun is located relatively near the minimum of the spiral perturbation potential (ψ⊙ = 284-20◦) and very near the corotation circle. The angular rotation velocity of the spiral pattern was found to be Ωp ≈ 30 km s−1 kpc −1. Key words. Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics -- Galaxy: solar neighbourhood -- Galaxy: structure -- Stars: early- type -- Stars: kinematics -- Stars: variables: Cepheids 1. Introduction Young stars have been traditionally used as probes of the galactic structure in the solar neighbourhood. Their lu- minosity makes them visible at large distances from the Sun, and their age is not great compared to the dynamical evolution timescales of our galaxy. These stars show kinematic characteristics that can- not be explained by solar motion and differential galactic rotation alone. Small perturbations in the galactic grav- itational potential induce the formation of density waves that can explain part of the special kinematic features of young stars in the solar neighbourhood and also the ex- istence of spiral arms in our galaxy. The first complete mathematical formulation of this theory was done by Lin and his associates (Lin & Shu 1964; Lin et al. 1969). Lin's theory has several free parameters that can be de- rived from observations. Two of the main parameters are the number of spiral arms (m) and their pitch angle (i). Although the original theory proposed a 2-armed spiral Send offprint requests to: D. Fern´andez, e-mail: [email protected] ⋆ Based on data from the Hipparcos astrometry satellite (European Space Agency) structure with i = −6◦, as early as the mid-70s Georgelin & Georgelin (1976) found 4 spiral arms with i = −12◦ from a study of the spatial distribution of HII regions. This controversy is still not resolved: in a review Vall´ee (1995) concluded that the most suitable value is m = 4, whereas Drimmel (2000) found that emission profiles of the galactic plane in the K band -- which traces stellar emission -- are consistent with a 2-armed pattern, whereas the 240 µm emission from dust is compatible with a 4- armed structure. In a recent paper, L´epine et al. (2001) described the spiral structure of our Galaxy in terms of a superposition of 2- and 4-armed wave harmonics, studying the kinematics of a sample of Cepheids stars and the l-v diagrams of HII regions. The angular rotation velocity of the spiral pattern Ωp is another parameter of the galactic spiral structure. It determines the rotation velocity of the spiral structure as a rigid body. The classical value proposed by Lin et al. (1969) is Ωp ≈ 13.5 km s−1 kpc−1. The angular rota- tion velocity in the solar neighbourhood due to differen- tial galactic rotation is Ω⊙ ≈ 26 km s−1 kpc−1 (Kerr & Lynden-Bell 1986). Thus, the value of Ωp implies that the so-called corotation circle (the galactocentric radius where Ωp = Ω) is in the outer region of our galaxy (cor ≈ 15-20 2 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars kpc, depending on the galactic rotation curve assumed). Nevertheless, several authors found higher values of Ωp, about 17-29 km s−1 kpc−1 (Marochnik et al. 1972; Cr´ez´e & Mennessier 1973; Byl & Ovenden 1978; Avedisova 1989; Amaral & L´epine 1997; Mishurov et al. 1997; Mishurov & Zenina 1999; L´epine et al. 2001). These values place the Sun near the corotation circle, in a region where the difference between the galactic rotation velocity and the rotation of the spiral arms is small. This fact has very important consequences for the star formation rate in the solar neighbourhood, since the compression of the inter- stellar medium due to shock fronts induced by density waves could be chiefly responsible for this process (Roberts 1970). Other parameters of Lin's theory are the amplitudes of induced perturbation in the velocity (in the antigalac- tocentric and the galactic rotation directions) of the stars and gas, and the phase of the spiral structure at the Sun's position. The interarm distance and the phase of the spiral structure can be determined from optical and radio obser- vations (Burton 1971; Bok & Bok 1974; Schmidt-Kaler 1975; Elmegreen 1985). The interarm distance gives us a relation between the number of arms and the pitch angle. In this paper we obtain the galactic kinematic param- eters from two samples of Hipparcos stars described in Sect. 2: one that contains O- and B-type stars, and an- other one composed of Cepheid variable stars. In Sect. 3 we propose a model of our galaxy, a generalization of that previously used by Comer´on & Torra (1991). The authors only applied their model to radial velocities. The accu- rate astrometry of the Hipparcos satellite offers a good opportunity to also use the proper motion data. The res- olution of the condition equations, based on a weighted least squares fit, is explained in Sect. 4. An extensive set of simulations is performed in Sect. 5 in order to assess the capabilities of the method, that is, to analyze the influence of the observational errors and biases in the kinematic pa- rameters. We finally present our results and discussion in Sect. 6 and 7, respectively. 2. The working samples 2.1. Sample of O and B stars Our initial sample contains 6922 Hipparcos O- and B-type stars. The astrometric data for these stars come from the Hipparcos Catalogue (ESA 1997), radial velocities from the compilation of Grenier (1997) and Stromgren pho- tometry from Hauck & Mermilliod's (1998) catalogue. The procedure followed to elaborate the sample consid- ered here is fully described in Torra et al. (2000; hereafter referred to as Paper I) along with a study of the possible biases in the trigonometric distances and the availabil- ity of radial velocities. Our sample contains 3915 stars with known distance and proper motions (2272 stars with known radial velocity). In Paper I we characterized the structure and kinematics of the Gould Belt system using this sample of O and B stars, establishing its boundary −2.0 −1.0 ) c p k ( X 0.0 1.0 2.0 −2.0 −1.0 0.0 Y (kpc) 1.0 2.0 Fig. 1. Star distribution in the X-Y galactic plane for the sample of O and B stars with 0.6 < R < 2 kpc. to a distance of about 0.6 kpc from the Sun. Taking into account the kinematic peculiarities of the Gould Belt, in this paper we do not consider those stars with R < 0.6 kpc. In Fig. 1 we show the position of those stars with 0.6 < R < 2 kpc projected on the galactic plane (X pos- itive towards the galactic center and Y positive towards the galactic rotation direction), which is our working sam- ple (448 stars; 307 of them with distance, radial velocity and proper motions and 141 with only distance and proper motions). 2.2. Sample of Cepheid stars The initial sample contains all the Hipparcos classi- cal Cepheids. Astrometric data were taken from the Hipparcos Catalogue (ESA 1997), whereas radial veloc- ities come from Pont et al. (1994, 1997). Individual distances were computed following two period-luminosity (PL) relations. In both, periods come from the Hipparcos Catalogue (ESA 1997) and individual reddenings from Fernie et al.'s (1995) compilation (contin- uous updating). A classification between fundamental and overtone Cepheids from light curves and Fourier analysis was adopted (Beaulieu 1999), using only the former in the kinematic analysis. The first PL relation (Luri 2000) adopts a slope from EROS (Beaulieu 1999) and corresponds to the short cos- mic distance scale: M Short v = −1.08 − 2.72 log P (1) On the other hand, the second PL relation (Feast & Catchpole 1997) corresponds to the large distance scale: M Large v = −1.41 − 3.46 log P (2) D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 3 −4.0 −2.0 ) c p k ( X 0.0 2.0 4.0 −4.0 −2.0 0.0 Y (kpc) 2.0 4.0 Fig. 2. Star distribution in the X-Y galactic plane for the sample of Cepheid stars with 0.6 < R < 4 kpc. Distances computed from a short cosmic distance scale (Luri 2000). The sample contains 186 stars with known distance and proper motions (165 stars with radial velocity). Their dis- tribution in the galactic plane (0.6 < R < 4 kpc) is shown in Fig. 2 (164 stars; 145 of them with distance, radial ve- locity and proper motions and 19 with only distance and proper motions). 3. A galactic kinematic model for the solar neighbourhood where we show the relationship between ar and the A Oort constant. B Oort constant can be derived from: B = A − Θ(⊙) ⊙ (5) We considered as free parameters the galactocentric dis- tance of the Sun (⊙) and the circular velocity at the Sun's position (Θ(⊙)). Finally, spiral arm kinematics was modelled within the framework of Lin's theory. We considered the number of the spiral arms (m) and their pitch angle (i) as free parameters, and we derived the perturbation velocity amplitudes in the antigalactocentric and tangential directions (Πb and Θb, respectively; they were considered as constant magnitudes, assuming that their variation with the galactocentric distance is smooth), the phase of the spiral structure at the Sun's position (ψ⊙) and the parameter f⊙, which takes into account the dif- ference in the velocity dispersion between the solar-type stars and the considered stars. This parameter is defined by the relationship between the spiral perturbation veloc- ity amplitudes for the sample stars (Πb, Θb) and for the Sun (Πb⊙, Θb⊙): Πb⊙ = Θb⊙ = 1 − ν2 + xstars 1 − ν2 + x⊙ 1 − ν2 + xstars 1 − ν2 + x⊙ Πb ≡ f⊙Πb Θb ≡ f⊙Θb (6) where ν is the dimensionless rotation frequency of the spiral structure and x is the stability Toomre's number (Toomre 1969), which depends on the velocity dispersion of the considered stars (see details in Appendix A). The inclusion of f⊙ is new with regard to the model proposed by Comer´on & Torra (1991). Eqs. (3) can be expressed as: 3.1. Systematic velocity field in the galactic model 10 We propose an extension of the bidimensional model pre- viously applied for radial velocities by Comer´on & Torra (1991). In our model we considered the systematic velocity components: vr(R, l, b) = vl(R, l, b) = vr = vr1 + vr2 + vr3 vl = vl1 + vl2 + vl3 vb = vb1 + vb2 + vb3 vb(R, l, b) = (3) 10 Xj=1 Xj=1 Xj=1 10 ajf r j (R, l, b) ajf l j(R, l, b) ajf b j (R, l, b) (7) where subindex 1 refers to the solar motion contribution, subindex 2 to differential galactic rotation and subindex 3 to spiral arm kinematics, respectively (see Appendix A). Solar motion is expressed through the three components of the Sun's velocity in galactic coordinates (U⊙, V⊙, W⊙). Galactic rotation curve was developed up to second-order approximation, ar and br being the first- and second-order terms, respectively: where the constants aj contain combinations of the kine- matic parameters we wish to determine (U⊙, V⊙, W⊙, ar, br, ψ⊙, Πb, Θb and f⊙) and f i j (R, l, b) are functions of the heliocentric distance and the galactic longitude and latitude (see Eqs. (A.21) and (A.22)). 3.2. Free parameters of our galactic model = ∂(cid:19)⊙ ar = (cid:18) ∂Θ 2(cid:18) ∂2Θ ∂2(cid:19)⊙ br = 1 Θ(⊙) ⊙ − 2A A 2-armed Galaxy was the first proposed view for our stel- lar system, mainly derived from HI and HII observations, but also from the spatial distribution of supergiant stars and other bright objects. These classical studies show the existence of at least two arms inside the solar circle (the (4) 4 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars Sagittarius-Carina or −I arm and the Norma-Scutum or −II arm), one local arm (Orion-Cygnus or 0 arm) and one external arm (Perseus or +I arm). The Orion-Cygnus arm seems to be a local spur (Bok 1958). Lin et al. (1969) pro- posed a galactic system with 2 main spiral arms, where the Norma-Scutum and the Perseus arms are two seg- ments of the same arm. By taking into account the in- terarm distance between the Sagittarius-Carina and the Perseus arms, these authors deduced a pitch angle of −6◦. But, as early as the mid-70s, Georgelin & Georgelin (1976) proposed a 4-armed galactic system with a pitch angle of −12◦ from a study of the spatial distribution of HII re- gions. However, Bash (1981) examined this 4-armed model and found that a 2-arm pattern predicts HII regions in the same direction and with the same radial velocities as those used by Georgelin & Georgelin (1976), provided that dis- persion velocities were considered. In some recent papers several authors have also called this classical view in question. Vall´ee (1995) reviewed the subject of the determination of the pitch angle and the number of spiral arms and concluded that the Galaxy has a pitch angle of i = −12±1◦ and that, taking into account the observed interarm distance, it would be a system of 4 spiral arms. This is also the opinion expressed by Amaral & L´epine (1997), who, fitting the galactic rotation curve to a mass model of the Galaxy, found an autoconsistent solution with a system of 2 + 4 spiral arms (2 arms for 2.8 < < 13 kpc and 4 arms for 6 < < 11 kpc, with the Sun placed at ⊙ = 7.9 kpc) and a pitch angle of i = −14◦. Englmaier & Gerhard (1999) used the COBE NIR luminosity distribution and connected it with the kinematic observations of HI and molecular gas in l-v di- agrams. They found a 4-armed spiral pattern between the corotation of the galactic bar and the solar circle. Drimmel (2000) found that the galactic plane emission in the K band is consistent with a 2-armed structure, whereas the 240 µm emission from dust is compatible with a 4-armed pattern. In a recent work, L´epine et al. (2001) analyzed the kinematics of a sample of Cepheid stars and found the best fit for a model with a superposition of 2+4 spiral arms. Contrary to the model by Amaral & L´epine (1997), L´epine et al. allowed the phase of both spiral patterns to be inde- pendent, deriving pitch angles of approximately −6◦ and −12◦ for m = 2 and m = 4, respectively. They argued that this spiral pattern is in good agreement with the l-v dia- grams obtained from observational HII data, though they admit that pure 2-armed model produces similar results. In the visible spiral structure of the Galaxy derived by L´epine et al. (see their Fig. 3) the Orion-Cygnus or local arm is seen as a major structure with a small pitch angle. In contrast, Olano (2001) proposed that the local arm is an elongated structure of only 4 kpc of length and a pitch angle of about −40◦ (in better agreement with the obser- vational determinations of the inclination of the local arm found in the literature) formed from a supercloud about 100 Myr ago, when it entered into a major spiral arm. In the case of the galactocentric distance of the Sun and the circular velocity at the Sun's position there are also some inconsistencies among the different values found in the literature. In 1986, the IAU adopted the values ⊙ = 8.5 kpc and Θ(⊙) = 220 km s−1 (Kerr & Lynden-Bell 1986). Recently, several authors have found values of nearly 7.5 kpc for ⊙ (Racine & Harris 1989; Maciel 1993). A complete review was done by Reid (1993), who concluded that the most suitable value seems to be ⊙ = 8.0 ± 0.5 kpc. In kinematic studies there are seri- ous discrepancies between different authors. Metzger et al. (1998) found ⊙ = 7.7±0.3 kpc and Θ(⊙) = 237±12 km s−1, whereas Feast et al. (1998) found ⊙ = 8.5 ± 0.3 kpc (both from radial velocities of Cepheid stars). Glushkova et al. (1998) found ⊙ = 7.3 ± 0.3 kpc from a com- bined sample including open clusters, red supergiants and Cepheids. Olling & Merrifield (1998) calculated mass mod- els for the Galaxy and concluded that a consistent picture only emerges when considering ⊙ = 7.1 ± 0.4 kpc and Θ(⊙) = 184 ± 8 km s−1. This value for the galactocen- tric distance of the Sun is in very good agreement with the only direct distance determination (⊙ = 7.2 ± 0.7 kpc), which was made employing proper motions of H2O masers (Reid 1993). In the view of all that, we decided to derive the kine- matic parameters of our model from different combina- tions of the free parameters involved. On the one hand, concerning spiral structure, two models of the Galaxy were considered: a first model with m = 2 and i = −6◦, and a second one with m = 4 and i = −14◦. Both models are consistent with an interarm distance of about 2.5-3 kpc, depending on the adopted value for the distance from the Sun to the galactic center. On the other hand, concerning the galactocentric distance of the Sun and the circular ve- locity at the Sun's position, two different cases were also taken into account: a first one with ⊙ = 8.5 kpc and Θ(⊙) = 220 km s−1, and a second one with ⊙ = 7.1 kpc and Θ(⊙) = 184 km s−1. In both cases, the angular rotation velocity at the Sun's position is Ω⊙ = 25.9 km s−1 kpc−1. 4. Resolution of the condition equations We determined the kinematic parameters of the galactic model via least squares fit from the equations: 10 vr = vl = k R µl cos b = vb = k R µb = 10 Xj=1 Xj=1 Xj=1 10 ajf r j (R, l, b) ajf l j(R, l, b) ajf b j (R, l, b) (8) where vr is the radial velocity of the star in km s−1, k = 4.741 km yr (s pc ′′)−1, R is the heliocentric distance of the star in pc, µl and µb are the proper motion in galactic longitude and latitude of the star in ′′ yr−1 and b the galactic latitude. To derive the parameters aj, an D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 5 iterative scheme extensively explained in Fern´andez (1998) was followed. The weight system was chosen as: pk = 1 σ2 k,obs + σ2 k,cos (9) where σobs are the individual observational errors in each velocity component of the star, calculated by taking into account the correlations between the different variables provided by the Hipparcos Catalogue, and σcos is the pro- jection of the cosmic velocity dispersion ellipsoid in the direction of the velocity component considered (see Paper I). To check the quality of the least squares fits we con- sidered the χ2 statistics for N − M degrees of freeedom, defined as: χ2 = N Xk=1 [yk − y(xk; a1, ..., a10)]2 σ2 k,obs + σ2 k,obs (10) where xk are the independent data (sky coordinates and distances), yk the dependent data (radial and tangential velocity components), N the number of equations and M number of parameters to be fitted. According to Press et al. (1992), if the uncertainties (cosmic dispersion and observational errors) are well-estimated, the value of χ2 for a moderately good fit would be χ2 ≈ N − M , with an uncertainty of p2 (N − M ). As we did in Paper I, to eliminate the possible outliers present in the sample due to both the exis- tence of high residual velocity stars (Royer 1997) or stars with unknown large observational errors, we re- jected those equations with a residual larger than 3 times the root mean square residual of the fit (computed as p[yk − y(xk; a1, ..., a10)]2/N ) and recomputed a new set of parameters. 5. Test of robustness The spiral arm potential is expected to contribute between 5-10% to the whole galactic gravitational field in the so- lar neighbourhood. This small contribution, and the large observational errors and constraints present on the spatial and kinematic parameters of distant stars, make it very difficult to quantify the kinematic perturbations induced by the spiral potential. Then, the results found in the liter- ature have been characterised by significant uncertainties and discrepancies. A good example of this is the contradic- tory results obtained for the phase of the spiral structure at the Sun's position (see Sect. 7.2): between arms or near an arm? Interesting questions to answer after the release of the Hipparcos data are: -- How does the unprecedented astrometric precision pro- vided by Hipparcos help to diminish such uncertain- ties? Are they small enough to measure the spiral arm kinematic parameters to any useful degree of accuracy? -- Can we quantify the biases induced by our observa- tional errors and constraints? Table 1. Number of stars with distance and proper mo- tions (in brackets those stars with also radial velocity) in several distance intervals. Distances for Cepheids com- puted from Luri's (2000) PL relation. sample of O and B stars 0.1 < R < 2 kpc 0.6 < R < 2 kpc 3418 (1903) 448 (307) sample of Cepheid stars 0.1 < R < 4 kpc 0.6 < R < 2 kpc 0.6 < R < 4 kpc 119 (111) 103 (95) 164 (145) -- How can the correlations among variables present in the condition equations affect the kinematic parame- ters? With regard to our stellar data, as seen in Sect. 2, both O and B star and Cepheid samples suffer from different observational limitations. Although the O and B star sam- ple is large in number, it is limited in distance to no more than 1.5-2 kpc from the Sun (see Fig. 1 and Table 1). In contrast, the Cepheid sample reaches distances of up to about 4 kpc, but the number of stars with reliable data still remains very small (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Numerical simulations were performed to answer the above questions, that is, to evaluate and quantify all the uncertainties and biases involved in our resolution pro- cess. In Appendix B we present the detailed procedure followed to build simulated samples as similar as possible to the real data for both O and B stars and Cepheids. This Appendix also contains an exhaustive analysis of the full set of cases which were simulated. Next we present the main conclusions arising from this work, which substan- tially contribute to the analysis of the real data: -- As a general trend, owing to the correlations between variables, the biases and uncertainties in some kine- matic parameters substantially vary when changing the real values of ψ⊙ and Ωp. -- The first- and second-order terms of the galactic rota- tion curve are accurately derived, with an uncertainty of less than 1.3 km s−1 kpc−1 (km s−1 kpc−2) in all cases. Whereas a negative bias for both parameters is detected for O and B stars (up to −0.7 km s−1 kpc−1 for ar and −1 km s−1 kpc−2 for br), it is negligible for Cepheids. -- For the spiral structure parameters, we obtain better results from O and B stars than from Cepheids. This is due to the larger number of O and B stars. For both samples we found a clear dependence of some param- eters with the assumed values for ψ⊙ and Ωp. We can expect a bias in ψ⊙ up to ±20◦, and uncertainties of 10-20◦ for O and B stars and 30-60◦ for Cepheids. For Πb and Θb we found biases up to ±2 km s−1 and uncer- tainties of 1-2 km s−1. We did not find an important bias for Ωp neither for O and B stars nor Cepheids, though its standard deviation is large (4-10 km s−1 kpc−1 for O and B stars and 10-20 km s−1 kpc−1 for 6 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars Cepheids). These ranges of values have allowed us to check how compatible are the results independently obtained for O and B stars and Cepheids. -- If we choose an incorrect set of free parameters (m, i, ⊙, Θ(⊙)), results change, but not to a large ex- tent. This change is similar to the dispersion obtained when solving the condition equations from the differ- ent simulated samples (see Appendix B for details). Therefore, it will be difficult to decide between 2- and 4-armed models. From these results, in Appendix B we conclude that, with the present available observational data, we are able to determine the kinematic parameters of the galactic model proposed in this paper, though we are not able to decide between a 2- or 4-armed Galaxy. 6. Results In this section we present the results obtained from our working samples. To avoid those stars belonging to the Gould Belt, which can produce important deviations in our results (see Paper I), we always considered stars fur- ther than 0.6 kpc from the Sun. Following the results ob- tained in Appendix B, the working distance intervals are 0.6 < R < 2 kpc for O and B stars and 0.6 < R < 4 kpc for Cepheids. A first set of results is presented in Table 2, consider- ing a classical view of our galaxy (Lin et al. 1969; Kerr & Lynden-Bell 1986): we supposed a differential galactic ro- tation (ar, br) and a system with 2 spiral arms and a pitch angle of −6◦, the Sun placed at a galactocentric distance of 8.5 kpc a the circular velocity at the Sun's position of 220 km s−1. Although we do not only present solutions from radial velocity or proper motion data, we would like to remark that the parameters obtained when solving these cases (and comparing with the combined solutions presented in Table 2) are compatible between themselves within the errors bars. This is true for the sample of O and B stars and also in the case of the sample of Cepheids (for both short and large cosmic scales). Nevertheless, as we deter- mined in Paper I, for this kind of kinematic analysis it is advisable to solve a combined resolution, in order to mini- mize the influence of the correlations present between the different parameters. This is especially important in the present case, since some correlations reach a large value (up to 0.8, though in the majority of cases they do not exceed 0.3). In Appendix B we check that these correla- tions do not impede our obtaining reliable results from our stellar samples. If we compare the results obtained from O and B stars and Cepheids, we observe several discrepancies: differences up to 3.5 km s−1 kpc−1 in the A Oort constant (derived from ar) and up to 125◦ for the phase of the spiral struc- ture at the Sun's position. We must keep in mind that, whereas this parameter (like Ωp and cor) is independent of the sample used, Πb, Θb and f⊙ depend on the cosmic Table 2. Resolution for the samples of O and B stars and Cepheids (SCS: short cosmic scale; LCS: large cos- mic scale). Units: U⊙, V⊙, W⊙, Πb, Θb and σ in km s−1; ar in km s−1 kpc−1; br in km s−1 kpc−2; ψ⊙ in degrees. χ2/N is the value of χ2 divided by the num- ber of equations minus the degrees of freedom. A cos- mic dispersion of (σU , σV , σW ) = (8, 8, 5) km s−1 and (σU , σV , σW ) = (13, 13, 6) km s−1 was used for O and B stars and Cepheids, respectively. O and B stars 0.6 < R < 2 kpc Cepheid stars 0.6 < R < 4 kpc 8.8 ± 0.7 12.4 ± 1.0 8.4 ± 0.5 −1.3 ± 1.0 −0.8 ± 1.5 45. ± 52. 1.6 ± 1.1 2.1 ± 1.5 0.42 ± 0.10 12.11 2.07 SCS distances 6.5 ± 1.2 10.4 ± 1.9 5.7 ± 0.7 −8.1 ± 1.2 1.8 ± 0.8 282. ± 20. 0.1 ± 1.6 4.9 ± 1.7 0.96 ± 0.01 11.57 0.84 LCS distances 8.3 ± 1.2 9.3 ± 2.1 7.0 ± 0.8 −4.5 ± 1.1 −0.1 ± 0.8 306. ± 24. 0.7 ± 1.4 4.8 ± 1.7 0.96 ± 0.01 11.77 0.84 U⊙ V⊙ W⊙ ar br ψ⊙ Πb Θb f⊙ σ χ2/N dispersion of the sample (thus, they do not have the same value for O and B stars and Cepheids). As in Paper I, we found values of χ2/N ≈ 2 for O and B stars. We think that the difference from the expected value (χ2/N ≈ 1) could be due to an underestimation of the errors in the photometric distances and/or radial velocities for far stars. In the case of Cepheids we found values which agree with the expected χ2/N ≈ 1. When studying the residuals of the equations we re- alized that radial velocity equations have a non-null av- erage residual of about −(3-4) km s−1 for both O and B stars and Cepheids. In the case of O and B stars (see Fig. 3) we can observe the peculiar motion of some OB associations. The kinematics of those associations located near the Sagittarius arm (e.g. Sgr OB1, Ser OB1 and Sct OB2, placed at 0◦ <∼ l <∼ 30◦) were studied by Mel'nik et al. (1998), who found that their motions are in gen- eral agreement with what would be expected according to Lin's theory if these stars are located within the corota- tion radius. But we found these stars have a large residual, even taking into account in our model the galactic spiral structure, possibly due to the fact that they are still re- flecting a motion peculiar to their birthplaces owing to their youth. Another region with a high residual is that located in the direction of the open clusters h and χ Per (NGC 869 and 884), at l ≈ 135◦, where we observe a group of stars (distributed in an area of 10◦ in the sky) with a high residual directed towards the Sun's position. Thus, our results indicate that these stars do not fit the systematic velocity field defined by the whole sample. In this region of the sky the associations Per OB1 and Cas OB6 are to be found. The former is generally considered to include h and χ Per and surrounding O and B stars. D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 7 However, the stars in Fig. 3 have distances 1.1 < R < 1.4 kpc, whereas the open clusters are located further on, at R ≈ 2-2.5 kpc (Schild 1967). In our initial sample (see Sect. 2), we have in this region a group of stars with dis- tances 2.0 < R < 2.6 kpc, most of them belonging to Per OB1 according to the membership list done by Garmany & Stencel (1992). But we did not use these stars in our kine- matic analysis, due to their large distance errors. Garmany & Stencel (1992) questioned if h and χ Per really belong to Per OB1 due to the fact that B main sequence stars do not define a ZAMS at the distance of the open clus- ters. These authors derived a distance modulus of 11.8 (R = 2.3 kpc) for Per OB1 and 11.9 (R = 2.4 kpc) for Cas OB6. More recently, Mel'nik & Efremov (1995) stud- ied the spatial distribution of O and B stars within 3 kpc from the Sun and derived a new partition into OB associ- ations using Battinelli's (1991) modification of the cluster analysis method. They found that Per OB1 split into four groups, two at R ≈ 1.6 kpc and another two at R ≈ 1.9 kpc. Two of them are reliable at a 90% confidence level (one at 1.6 kpc and another at 1.9 kpc), with a mean he- liocentric radial velocity of −21.6 km s−1 and −41.4 km s−1, respectively. The first association found by Mel'nik & Efremov might correspond to the group of stars we have at 1.1 < R < 1.4 kpc. In view of all that, the physical explanation of the large negative radial residuals present in this region, even considering the contribution from the spiral arm kinematics, is still unresolved. If we exclude those stars belonging to both regions from our calculations, the average residual in radial ve- locity decreases to −(1-2) km s−1. For Cepheids, as men- tioned above, the residuals have the same trend and reach up to −(3-4) km s−1, though in this case we cannot clearly identify groups of stars with a common motion. Therefore, the mean negative residual motion observed does not seem to be explained as the peculiar motion of some groups of stars. Moreover, we found that, for both samples, this residual motion apparently does not depend on the galatic longitude of the stars. Taking into account that Cepheids, with a large mean distance, show larger residuals than O and B stars, we can suppose that this systematic trend could be explained through the addition of a K-term in Eqs. (3), as developed in Paper I. Then, the following terms can be added to Eqs. (8): 11 = R cos2 b f r f l 11 = 0 f b 11 = −R sin b cos b (11) which allow us to derive the parameter a11 = K. Table 3 shows the results obtained in this way, and considering different sets of free parameters (as proposed in Sect. 3.2). The correlation coefficient between K and the other pa- rameters is always low, being smaller than 0.4 for O and B stars and 0.2 for Cepheids. As stated in Appendix B, a change in the value of the free parameters (m, i, ⊙ and Θ(⊙)) does not significantly alter the kinematic param- Fig. 3. Residual heliocentric space velocity vectors pro- jected on the galactic plane for O and B stars. GR stands for galactic rotation direction and GC for galactic center direction. eters derived. In Table 3 we also show the results when rejecting those stars belonging to the problematic regions mentioned above in the case of O and B stars. We observe that there is not a great difference in the results between these cases, which are always compatible within the er- rors. So, we conclude that the observed peculiar motion of some OB associations present in our sample does not alter the main parameters of our model. In view of that, in the next section we discuss the results obtained when considering all the stars, without rejecting associations. 7. Discussion 7.1. Galactic rotation curve A difference in the A Oort constant of approximately 3 km s−1 kpc−1 between solutions for O and B stars and Cepheids with short cosmic scale distances is obtained, whereas large cosmic scale provides an intermediate value: AOB ≈ 13.7-13.8 km s−1 kpc−1 ACep Short ≈ 16.6-16.9 km s−1 kpc−1 ACep Large ≈ 14.9-15.1 km s−1 kpc−1 (12) As can be seen in Appendix B, these differences cannot be explained by the observational constraints present in both samples. A similar discrepancy was found by Frink et al. (1996), who derived A = 14.0 ± 1.2 km s−1 kpc−1 from a sample of O and B stars, and A = 15.8±1.6 km s−1 kpc−1 from a sample of Cepheids (in both cases the authors only considered those stars with a heliocentric distance of less than 1 kpc). Nonetheless, our values for Cepheids do not reach the higher values obtained by Glushkova et al. (1998; 8 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars Table 3. Resolution by least squares fit considering differ- ent values of the imposed galactic parameters m, i, ⊙ and Θ(⊙). Case A: m = 2, i = −6◦, ⊙ = 8.5 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 220 km s−1; Case D: m = 4, i = −14◦, ⊙ = 7.1 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 184 km s−1. Units: U⊙, V⊙, W⊙, Πb, Θb and σ in km s−1; ar, K, A, B and Ωp in km s−1 kpc−1; br in km s−1 kpc−2; ψ⊙ in degrees; ∆cor = ⊙ − cor in kpc. χ2/N is the value of χ2 divided by the number of equa- tions minus the degrees of freedom. G1 and G2 stand for those groups of stars located in 0 < l < 50◦, 1 < R < 2 kpc (29 stars) and 130 < l < 140◦, 1 < R < 2 kpc (14 stars), respectively. O and B stars with 0.6 < R < 2 kpc Case A Case D Case D 2.3 ± 1.5 0.5 ± 1.3 9.2 ± 0.7 12.7 ± 1.1 8.3 ± 0.5 9.2 ± 0.8 13.2 ± 1.0 8.3 ± 0.5 10.0 ± 0.7 12.7 ± 1.0 8.3 ± 0.5 Case D excluding G1 excluding G2 9.6 ± 0.8 U⊙ 12.3 ± 1.1 V⊙ 8.4 ± 0.5 W⊙ −1.7 ± 1.0 −1.5 ± 1.0 −2.3 ± 1.2 −0.9 ± 1.0 ar −0.4 ± 1.5 0.0 ± 1.4 br −3.2 ± 0.7 −2.8 ± 0.7 −1.4 ± 0.7 −2.4 ± 0.7 K 8. ± 52. ψ⊙ 2.8 ± 1.1 Πb 1.8 ± 1.3 Θb 0.19 ± 0.77 f⊙ A 13.4 ± 0.5 B −12.7 ± 0.8 −13.2 ± 0.7 −14.1 ± 0.8 −13.0 ± 0.7 Ωp 36. ± 8. 2.0 ± 1.2 11.85 1.89 329. ± 47. 2.6 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 1.3 0.23 ± 0.57 0.35 ± 0.25 13.7 ± 0.5 315. ± 32. 3.2 ± 1.1 3.2 ± 1.5 0.40 ± 0.10 14.1 ± 0.6 33. ± 6. 1.5 ± 0.9 11.88 1.90 32. ± 3. 1.1 ± 0.6 11.74 1.90 45. ± 14. 3.6 ± 1.6 11.85 1.89 20. ± 53. 3.1 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 1.3 13.8 ± 0.5 ∆cor σ χ2/N Cepheid stars with 0.6 < R < 4 kpc SCS distances LCS distances 1.6 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 0.8 Case A 8.4 ± 1.2 9.1 ± 2.1 7.0 ± 0.8 Case A 6.5 ± 1.2 10.5 ± 1.9 5.7 ± 0.7 Case D 6.5 ± 1.2 11.0 ± 2.1 5.7 ± 0.8 Case D 8.2 ± 1.2 U⊙ 10.1 ± 2.3 V⊙ 7.0 ± 0.8 W⊙ −7.9 ± 1.2 −7.4 ± 1.2 −4.4 ± 1.1 −3.9 ± 1.1 ar 0.1 ± 0.8 −0.9 ± 0.8 br −0.8 ± 0.5 −1.0 ± 0.5 −1.2 ± 0.5 −1.2 ± 0.5 K 321. ± 43. 286. ± 21. ψ⊙ 0.4 ± 1.2 Πb 2.7 ± 1.7 Θb 0.96 ± 0.01 f⊙ A 14.9 ± 0.6 B −13.7 ± 0.4 −13.2 ± 0.4 −13.0 ± 0.4 −12.5 ± 0.4 Ωp 27. ± 2. 0.2 ± 0.6 11.90 0.86 284. ± 39. 0.0 ± 1.6 −1.4 ± 1.6 2.4 ± 1.7 4.8 ± 1.7 0.96 ± 0.01 0.95 ± 0.01 16.6 ± 0.6 23. ± 4. 0.0 ± 1.0 −0.7 ± 1.2 11.66 0.85 310. ± 21. 0.9 ± 1.3 5.6 ± 1.7 0.96 ± 0.01 15.1 ± 0.6 28. ± 3. 0.5 ± 0.8 11.70 0.83 11.56 0.84 16.9 ± 0.6 26. ± 3. σ ∆cor χ2/N A = 19.5 ± 0.5 km s−1 kpc−1), Mishurov et al. (1997; A = 20.9 ± 1.2 km s−1 kpc−1), Mishurov & Zenina (1999; A = 18.8±1.3 km s−1 kpc−1) and L´epine et al. (2001; A = 17.5 ± 0.8 km s−1 kpc−1). Pont et al. (1994) and Metzger et al. (1998), from radial velocities of Cepheid stars, found values of A = 15.9 ± 0.3 km s−1 kpc−2 and A = 15.5 ± 0.4 km s−1 kpc−2, respectively. More recently, and using proper motions and distance calibration from Hipparcos data on Cepheid stars, Feast & Whitelock (1997) found a value of A = 14.8 ± 0.8 km s−1 kpc−1. Using a similar sample, Feast et al. (1998) found A = 15.1 ± 0.3 km s−1 kpc−1 from radial velocities. As we have mentioned in Sect. 6, we found good coherence for radial velocity, proper motion and combined solutions for both cosmic distance scales. An attempt to explain these discrepancies was made by Olling & Merrifield (1998), who studied the variation of the A and B Oort functions and found that they sig- nificantly differ from the general ∼ Θ()/ dependence expected for a nearly flat rotation curve. Inside the so- lar circle, the value of A rises to 18 km s−1 kpc−1 for ∆ = − ⊙ ≈ −0.5 kpc, disminishes to 16 km s−1 kpc−1 for ∆ ≈ −1.2 kpc, and rises continuously for ∆ <∼ −1.5 kpc, to 19 km s−1 kpc−1 for ∆ ≈ −2 kpc (see Fig. 3 in Olling & Merrifield 1998). Contrary to that, beyond the solar circle A decreases to 10-12 km s−1 kpc−1, maintaining this value in the interval 0 <∼ ∆ <∼ 2.5 kpc. Although A is a local parameter, describing the local shape of the rotation curve, Olling & Merrifield already pointed out that the discrepancies in the results published in the literature may be produced by their dependence on the galactocentric distance. Our O and B stars are distributed along all the galactic longitudes, whereas the Cepheids are predominantly concentrated inside the solar circle, with a peak in the spatial distribution for ∆ ≈ −0.6 kpc corresponding to the Sagittarius-Carina arm (see Figs. 1 and 2). For O and B stars we found a classical value of A ≈ 14 km s−1 kpc−1 (a value between 10-12 and 16-18 km s−1 kpc−1), whereas for Cepheids a value A ≈ 15-17 km s−1 kpc−1 (depending on the PL relation considered) was derived, in agreement with Olling & Merrifield's as- sumptions. From the results obtained in Appendix B, we would ex- pect uncertainties in the second-order term of the rotation curve of ≈ 1.0 km s−1 kpc−2 for O and B stars and ≈ 0.5 km s−1 kpc−2 in the case of Cepheids. Taking this and the results in Table 3 into account, we can state that br does not differ from a null value more than 2 km s−1 kpc−2. Pont et al. (1994) found a value br = −1.7 ± 0.2 km s−1 kpc−2, whereas Feast et al. (1998) found br = −1.6 ± 0.2 km s−1 kpc−2, both using radial velocities of Cepheid stars (the latter with a Hipparcos distance calibration). A large positive value was found by L´epine et al. (2001), who de- rived br = 5.0 ± 1.0 km s−1 kpc−2 from their sample of Cepheid stars. As we will see in Sect. 7.2, these authors also found a large value for the amplitude of the velocity component in the galactic rotation direction due to the spiral potential (Θb). Without specific simulations, con- sidering both their observational data and resolution pro- cedure, it is difficult to guess how the correlations between both parameters can affect their determination. −4.0 −2.0 ) c p k ( X 0.0 2.0 4.0 −4.0 −2.0 0.0 Y (kpc) 2.0 4.0 Fig. 4. Star distribution in the X-Y galactic plane for O and B stars (filled circles) with 0.6 < R < 2 kpc and Cepheids (empty circles) with 0.6 < R < 4 kpc (short cosmic scale distances). Spiral arms were drawn consider- ing ψ⊙ = 330◦. Dotted lines show the center of the spiral arms (ψ = 0◦) and dashed lines draw their approximate edges (ψ = ±90◦). Looking at this figure we must have in mind the possible drift between the position of the optical tracers in the spiral arms (i.e., our young stars) and the minimum of the spiral potential (ψ = 0◦). 7.2. Spiral structure Appendix B demonstrates that the available observational data allow the characterization of the galactic spiral struc- ture, though the biases and uncertainties on the parame- ters have to be taken into account in the interpretation of the results. Furthermore, we realized that it is very diffi- cult to establish the correct number of spiral arms of the Galaxy. A first remarkable result is the fairly good coherence obtained for the phase of the spiral structure at the Sun's position ψ⊙ when using different free parameters (cases A, D) or different samples compared to the great discrep- ancies found in the literature (see below). We take into consideration that Πb, Θb and f⊙ depend on the cosmic dispersion and so they do not have the same value for O and B stars and Cepheids. From Fig. 2, and assuming that Cepheids fairly trace the center of the Sagittarius-Carina arm, we can infer a value of ψ⊙ ≈ 250◦ (the center of the inner visible spiral arm -- the Sagittarius-Carina arm -- at about 1 kpc from the Sun), depending on the exact value of the interarm distance. Nevertheless, the density wave theory predicts that the center of the visible arm (traced by its young stars) does not coincide with the position of the spiral potential minimum (Roberts 1969, 1970). We must bear in D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 9 mind that the kinematically derived value for ψ⊙ informs us about the position of the Sun with respect this potential minimum, not with respect the visible arm. In Table 3 we found values inside the interval: ψ⊙ ≈ 284-20◦ (13) We take into consideration that in the minimum of the spi- ral potential (near the center of an arm) ψ = 0◦, whereas in the inner edge of the arm ψ ≈ 90◦ and in the outer edge ψ ≈ −90◦ = 270◦. In the case of the phase of the spiral structure at the Sun's position we expect a bias of ∆ψ⊙ = ψobtained ⊙ ≈ 20◦ for O and B stars and ∆ψ⊙ ≈ 0◦ for Cepheids, with uncertainties of ≈ 25◦ and ≈ 75◦, respectively (see Appendix B). These high uncertainties can explain the range of values obtained. According to the value found for ψ⊙, the Sun is located between the center and the outer edge of an arm, nearer to the former (see Fig. 4). − ψreal ⊙ Our result stands in apparent contradiction to the clas- sical mapping of the spiral structure tracers (Schmidt- Kaler 1975; Elmegreen 1985), which locates the Sun in a middle position between the inner arm (Sagittarius-Carina arm) and the outer one (Perseus arm), that is, ψ⊙ ≈ 180◦. The local arm (Orion-Cygnus arm) is normally considered as a local spur rather than a real arm. In our model, as we supposed an interarm distance of approximately 3 kpc, the local arm is also considered a local spur (see Sect. 3.2). But the value we obtained for ψ⊙ differs significantly from 180◦. If we consider a difference of 30-100◦ between the op- tical tracers and the potential minimum of the spiral arm, we notice that our ψ⊙ value is in good agreement with the picture of the spiral structure that emerges from the spatial distribution of stars in Fig. 4, with the inner spi- ral arm at approximately 1 kpc from the Sun. A similar result was obtained by Mel'nik et al. (1998), who found that nearly 70% of the stars in the OB associations of the Sagittarius-Carina arm have a residual motion (after cor- recting their heliocentric velocities for solar motion and galactic rotation) in the direction opposite to the galac- tic rotation, as one would expect for those stars between the inner edge and the center of the arm. Then, they also found a shift between the optical position of the visible arm (traced by young stars) and the minimum of the spi- ral potential. Therefore, from our results we conclude that the Sun is placed relatively near the potential minimum of the Sagittarius-Carina arm, and the Perseus arm is lo- cated far away, at about 2.5 kpc from the Sun. Our range of values for ψ⊙ includes that obtained by Cr´ez´e & Mennessier (1973) from a sample of O-B3 stars, ψ⊙ = 352 ± 30◦. Later, Mennessier & Cr´ez´e (1975) found from a sample of O-B3 stars a value of ψ⊙ ≈ 90◦, which locates the Sun near the inner edge of an arm. Other authors obtained contradictory results. G´omez & Mennessier (1977) found the Sun's position near the edge of an arm from several samples of stars from FK4 and FK4 Supplement Catalogues. Byl & Ovenden (1978) and Comer´on & Torra (1991) obtained values of ψ⊙ = 165±1◦ and ψ⊙ = 135 ± 18◦ respectively, from samples of O and 10 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars B stars. Mishurov et al. (1997) found ψ⊙ = 290 ± 16◦ from a sample of Cepheid stars with radial velocities. Mishurov & Zenina (1999) found ψ⊙ = 322 ± 9◦ (sup- posing m = 2 and ⊙ = 7.5 kpc), from the same sample of Cepheid stars, but also including the Hipparcos proper motions. When these authors supposed m = 4 they found ψ⊙ = 340 ± 9◦. More recently, Rastorguev et al. (2001) found ψ⊙ = 274 ± 22◦ from a sample of 55 open clus- ters younger than 40 Myr and 67 Cepheids with periods smaller than 9 days, all of them at R < 4 kpc. We can see that there is poor agreement between the results published in the literature, though the last ones (the only ones with Hipparcos data) are all included in our range of possible values for ψ⊙. The velocity amplitudes due to the spiral perturbation obtained are less than 4 km s−1 for O and B stars (Πb ≈ 3 km s−1, Θb ≈ 2-3 km s−1) and 6 km s−1 for Cepheid stars (Πb ≈ −1-1 km s−1, Θb ≈ 2-6 km s−1). The dif- ference between results for O and B stars and Cepheids is explained by Lin's theory as a result of their slight de- pendence on the galactocentric distance and the differ- ent cosmic dispersion for both samples. Mishurov et al. (1997) found Πb = 6.3 ± 2.4 km s−1 and Θb = 4.4 ± 2.4 km s−1 from their radial velocity data of Cepheid stars within 4 kpc from the Sun, supposing a 2-armed spiral pattern. Mel'nik et al. (1999) found Πb = 6.4 ± 1.2 km s−1 and Θb = 2.4 ± 1.2 km s−1 from Cepheids within 3 kpc from the Sun. Mishurov & Zenina (1999) found Πb = 3.3 ± 1.6 km s−1 and Θb = 7.9 ± 2.0 km s−1 for m = 2 and Πb = 3.5 ± 1.7 km s−1 and Θb = 7.5 ± 1.8 km s−1 for m = 4. From the same sample, L´epine et al. (2001) found Πm=2 = 14.0 ± 3.0 km s−1 and Πm=4 = 10.9 ± 2.9 km s−1. Their 2+4-armed model yields large values for Θb, implying a large value for the ratio between the spiral po- tential and the axisymmetric galactic field, much greater than that 5-10% normally accepted. According to the re- sults obtained in Appendix B, the present observational uncertainties, biases and the correlations involved in the resolution procedure cannot completely explain the dis- crepancies among the values found in the literature. They can be attributed to our poor knowledge of the real wave harmonic structure of the galactic spiral pattern or to the approximation performed in the linear density-wave the- ory. = 0.4 ± 3.0 km s−1, Θm=2 = 0.8 ± 3.3 km s−1, Θm=4 b b b b The derived angular rotation velocity of the spiral pat- tern is: Ωp ≈ 30 km s−1 kpc−1 (14) though there is a great dispersion around this value in our results from different samples and cases (dispersion of 2-7 km s−1 kpc−1, but up to 15 km s−1 kpc−1 in one extreme case). This is an expected dispersion, taking into account the results obtained in Appendix B (standard deviation of 2-5 km s−1 kpc−1 for O and B stars, but up to 15 km s−1 kpc−1 for ψ⊙ ≈ 270◦; for Cepheids dispersions are higher, of about 10-20 km s−1 kpc−1). Such a value places the Sun very near the corotation circle and is not in agreement with the classical Ωp ≈ 13.5 km s−1 kpc−1 proposed by Lin et al. (1969). Nevertheless, other studies show results similar to ours. Avedisova (1989) obtained Ωp = 26.8 ± 2 km s−1 kpc−1 from the spatial distribution of young objects of different ages in the Sagittarius-Carina arm. More recently, Amaral & L´epine (1997), working with a selection of young members of the open cluster catalogue by Mermilliod (1986), obtained a value of Ωp ≈ 20-22 km s−1 kpc−1. Mishurov et al. (1997) and Mishurov & Zenina (1999) used their sample of Cepheid stars and found Ωp = 28.1 ± 2.0 km s−1 kpc−1 and Ωp ≈ 27.7 km s−1 kpc−1, respectively. L´epine et al. (2001) found Ωm=2 ≈ 26.5 km s−1 kpc−1 from their sample of Cepheid stars. Rastorguev et al. (2001) thought that the evaluation of Ωp from kinematical data alone cannot be resolved. But our simulations (see Appendix B) seem to indicate that, at least, the tendency to find high values of Ωp is confirmed, though there is still an uncertainty of about 5-10 km s−1 kpc−1 in its value. These large values for Ωp can explain in a natural way the presence of a gap in the galactic gaseous disk (see Kerr 1969 and Burton 1976 for observational evidences and L´epine et al. 2001 for simulated results), since they placed the Sun near the corotation circle, where the gas is pumped out under the influence of the spiral potential. ≈ Ωm=4 p p 7.3. The K-term In relation to the K-term, we found good agreement be- tween both O and B stars and Cepheids. A value of K ≈ −(1-3) km s−1 kpc−1 is found in all cases, confirm- ing an apparent compression of the solar neighbourhood of up to 3-4 kpc. In our opinion, what most clearly proves the existence of a non-null value of K is that it is inde- pendently found from the samples of O and B stars and Cepheids, which have a very different spatial distribution, an independent distance estimation and a different way of deriving their radial velocities. As we can see comparing Tables 2 and 3, the inclusion of the K-term does not sub- stantially modify the other model parameters derived by least squares fit. It is very difficult to find in the literature other esti- mations of K at these large heliocentric distances, since in the majority of cases authors consider an axisymmet- ric rotation curve. But some authors have pointed out the persistence of a residual in the radial velocity equations. Comer´on & Torra (1994) found K = −1.9 ± 0.5 km s−1 kpc−1 from O-B5.5 stars and K = −1.3 ± 0.9 km s−1 kpc−1 from B6-A0 stars with R < 1.5 kpc. The radial ve- locity residual for Cepheids was first recognised by Stibbs (1956). Pont et al. (1994) studied three possible origins for it: a statistical effect, an intrinsic effect in the measured radial velocities for Cepheids (γ-velocities) and a real dy- namical effect. They finally suggested that it could be due to a non-axisymmetric motion produced by a central bar of ≈ 5 kpc in extent. Metzger et al. (1998) found a residual of ≈ −3 km s−1 for a sample of Cepheids when consid- D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 11 ering an axisymmetric galactic rotation. They concluded that it might be due to the influence of spiral structure, not included in their model. However, in the present work we found a non-null K value even taking into account spiral arm kinematics. An understanding of the physical explanation of the K-term requires further study. Appendix A: systematic velocity components in the proposed galactic model In this appendix we show the expressions of the velocity components in the three systematic contributions consid- ered in our galactic model: solar motion, differential galac- tic rotation and spiral arm kinematics. 8. Conclusions A.1. Solar motion Hipparcos astrometric data were used to derive the spiral structure of the Galaxy in the solar neighbourhood. We considered two different samples of stars as tracers of this structure. In the sample of O and B stars the astromet- ric data were complemented with a careful compilation of radial velocities and Stromgren photometry, providing reliable distances and spatial velocities for these stars. In the sample of Cepheid stars we used two period-luminosity relations, one considering a short cosmic scale (Luri 2000) and another one standing for a large cosmic scale (Feast & Catchpole 1997). A kinematic model of our galaxy that takes into ac- count solar motion, differential galactic rotation, spiral arm kinematics and a K-term was adopted. The model parameters were derived via a classical weighted least squares fit. The robustness of our results was checked by means of careful insimulations. A galactic rotation curve with a value of A Oort con- stant of 13.7-13.8 km s−1 kpc−1 was found for the sam- ple of O and B stars. In the case of Cepheid stars, we found A = 14.9-16.9 km s−1 kpc−1, depending on the case and the cosmic scale chosen. We confirmed the dis- crepancies appearing in A when samples with a different distance horizon were used (Olling & Merrifield 1998). For both cosmic scales we found an acceptable coherence be- tween radial velocity, proper motion and combined solu- tions. Concerning the second-order term of the rotation curve, we always found a low value, compatible with zero. The study of the residuals for radial velocity data made it evident that a K-term was needed, which was found to be K = −(1.4-3.2) km s−1 kpc−1 for O and B stars and K = −(0.8-1.2) km s−1 kpc−1 for Cepheids. Although small, an apparent compression motion seems to exist in the galactic local neighbourhood for heliocentric distances up to 4 kpc, though its physical mechanism is still un- known. The phase of the spiral structure at the Sun's posi- tion obtained (ψ⊙ = 284-20◦) places it between the center and the outer edge of an arm. This is in good agreement with the spatial distribution of Cepheid stars. The angu- lar rotation velocity of the spiral structure was found to be Ωp ≈ 30 km s−1 kpc−1, which places the Sun near the corotation circle. Acknowledgements. This work has been supported by the CICYT under contracts ESP 97-1803 and AYA 2000-0937. DF acknowledges the FRD grant from the Universitat de Barcelona (Spain). A star with galactic longitude l and galactic latitude b has the following radial and tangential velocity components owing to solar proper motion: vr1 = −U⊙ cos l cos b − V⊙ sin l cos b − W⊙ sin b vl1 = U⊙ sin l − V⊙ cos l vb1 = U⊙ cos l sin b + V⊙ sin l sin b − W⊙ cos b (A.1) where U⊙, V⊙ and W⊙ are the components of the solar motion in galactic coordinates. A.2. Galactic rotation We consider axisymmetric differential rotation of our galaxy, with a rotation curve that can be developed in the solar neighbourhood as: Θ() ≈ Θ(⊙) +(cid:18) ∂Θ ∂(cid:19)⊙ ∆ + ≡ Θ(⊙) + ar∆ + br∆2 1 2(cid:18) ∂2Θ ∂2(cid:19)⊙ ∆2 (A.2) where ∆ = −⊙ (⊙ is the galactocentric distance of the Sun) and Θ(⊙) is the circular velocity at the Sun's position. We note that ar allows us to calculate the A Oort constant in the Sun's vicinity: A = 1 2" Θ(⊙) ⊙ −(cid:18) ∂Θ ∂(cid:19)⊙# = 1 2(cid:20) Θ(⊙) ⊙ − ar(cid:21) (A.3) The radial and tangential velocity components of a star in the galactic plane due to differential galactic rotation are: vr2 = Θ(⊙) [sin(l + θ) − sin l] cos b +ar∆ sin(l + θ) cos b +br∆2 sin(l + θ) cos b vl2 = Θ(⊙) [cos(l + θ) − cos l] +ar∆ cos(l + θ) +br∆2 cos(l + θ) vb2 = −Θ(⊙) [sin(l + θ) − sin l] sin b −ar∆ sin(l + θ) sin b −br∆2 sin(l + θ) sin b (A.4) where θ is the galactocentric longitude of the star. 12 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars A.3. Spiral structure kinematics Lin's theory (Lin & Shu 1964; Lin et al. 1969; see also Rohlfs 1977) assumes a spiral potential of the form: Vb = A cos ψ (A.5) (A is the amplitude -- A < 0 -- and ψ is the phase of the density wave) which disturbs the axially symmetric gravitational potential. The shape of the spiral arms is well represented by a logarithmic spiral: q(, θ, t) = q eiψ(,θ,t) (A.6) The amplitude q is a slowly varying function of and the phase of the spiral structure can be related to the phase at the Sun's position by the following expression: ψ(, θ, t) = ψ⊙(t) + m(Ωpt − θ) + ⇒ ψ(, θ, t = 0) = ψ⊙ + mθ + m ln ⊙(t) tan i ⇒ m ln ⊙ tan i where Ωp is the angular rotation velocity of the spiral pat- tern, m the number of spiral arms and i the pitch angle (for trailing spiral arms, i < 0). The phase of the spiral struc- ture at the Sun's position and the pitch angle can be de- termined from optical and radio indicators. Nevertheless, we point out that the maximum in the distribution of spi- ral arm tracers (position of the observed spiral arms) may be shifted in relation to the minimum in the perturbation potential (defined as ψ = 0◦; see Roberts 1969). The mean peculiar velocities due to the spiral arm per- turbations on the velocity field are, in the gas approxima- tion, the following: and x is the stability Toomre's number (Toomre 1969) defined as: x = k2a2 o κ2 (A.12) where ao is the velocity dispersion of the gas particles. Since the velocity amplitudes Πb and Θb depend on this velocity dispersion, we introduce a dimensionless param- eter (f⊙) that relates the velocity amplitudes of the Sun to those of the sample stars: Πb⊙ = Θb⊙ = 1 − ν2 + xstars 1 − ν2 + x⊙ 1 − ν2 + xstars 1 − ν2 + x⊙ Πb ≡ f⊙Πb Θb ≡ f⊙Θb (A.13) The so-called Lindblad resonances are defined as: Ωp = Ω ± κ m (A.7) (A.14) where the − sign corresponds to the inner resonance and the + sign to the outer one. In the region between both resonances (ν < 1), Θb is always positive and Πb has a sign that depends on the sign of ν. The amplitude of the spiral potential can be expressed as: A = κΠb 1 − ν2 + x k ν (A.15) The maximum value of the radial force owing to this spiral potential is: F max r1 = kA (A.16) whereas the radial force due to the axisymmetric field is: Π1 = Θ1 = − kA κ 1 2 ν 1 − ν2 + x kA 1 Θ 1 − ν2 + x cos ψ ≡ Πb cos ψ sin ψ ≡ −Θb sin ψ (A.8) Fr0 = dV0 d ≈ Ω2 ⊙⊙ Π1 is positive towards the galactic anti-center and Θ1 is positive towards the galactic rotation. In tightly wound spirals (i.e., those with tan i ≪ 1) the amplitudes Πb and Θb are slowly varying quantities with the galactocentric distance. k is the radial wave number (for trailing spiral arms, k < 0): (A.17) (A.18) Therefore, the ratio between both quantities is: fr = F max r1 Fr0 ≈ κΠb Ω2 ⊙⊙ 1 − ν2 + x ν The contributions in the radial and tangential velocity components of a star due to the spiral arm perturbation velocities Π1 and Θ1 are the following: k = d d m ln tan i ! = ⊙ m tan i (A.9) vr3 = −Π1 cos(l + θ) cos b + Π1⊙ cos l cos b ν is the dimensionless rotation frequency of the spiral structure, expressed in terms of the epicyclic frequency (κ): ν = m κ (cid:18)Ωp − Θ (cid:19) (A.10) (notice that ν < 0 in the region with Ωp < Ω = Θ/, i.e. inner to the corotation circle). Furthermore: +Θ1 sin(l + θ) cos b − Θ1⊙ sin l cos b = −Πb cos ψ⊙ ln ⊙ × cos"m θ − −Πb sin ψ⊙ sin"m θ − −Θb sin ψ⊙ tan i !# cos(l + θ) − f⊙ cos l! cos b ln ⊙ tan i !# cos(l + θ) cos b κ2 = 2Θ2 2 (cid:18)1 + Θ dΘ d(cid:19) (A.11) × cos"m θ − ln ⊙ tan i !# sin(l + θ) − f⊙ sin l! cos b D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 13 +Θb cos ψ⊙ sin"m θ − ln ⊙ tan i !# sin(l + θ) cos b vl3 = Π1 sin(l + θ) − Π1⊙ sin l + Θ1 cos(l + θ) − Θ1⊙ cos l = Πb cos ψ⊙ tan i !# sin(l + θ) − f⊙ sin l! a3 = W⊙ a4 = Θ(⊙) a5 = ar a6 = br a7 = Πb cos ψ⊙ a8 = Πb sin ψ⊙ a9 = Θb sin ψ⊙ a10 = Θb cos ψ⊙ (A.21) ln ⊙ tan i !# sin(l + θ) j (R, l, b) are functions of the heliocentric distance and f i and the galactic longitude and latitude: ln ⊙ × cos"m θ − +Πb sin ψ⊙ sin"m θ − −Θb sin ψ⊙ ln ⊙ × cos"m θ − +Θb cos ψ⊙ sin"m θ − tan i !# cos(l + θ) − f⊙ cos l! ln ⊙ tan i !# cos(l + θ) f r 1 = − cos l cos b f r 2 = − sin l cos b f r 3 = − sin b f r 4 = [sin(l + θ) − sin l] cos b f r 5 = ∆ sin(l + θ) cos b f r 6 = ∆2 sin(l + θ) cos b vb3 = Π1 cos(l + θ) sin b − Π1⊙ cos l sin b −Θ1 sin(l + θ) sin b + Θ1⊙ sin l sin b = Πb cos ψ⊙ ln ⊙ × cos"m θ − +Πb sin ψ⊙ sin"m θ − +Θb sin ψ⊙ ln ⊙ × cos"m θ − −Θb cos ψ⊙ sin"m θ − tan i !# cos(l + θ − f⊙ cos l! sin b ln ⊙ tan i !# cos(l + θ) sin b tan i !# sin(l + θ) − f⊙ sin l! sin b f r ln ⊙ tan i !# sin(l + θ) sin b (A.19) A.4. Systematic velocity field in the proposed galactic model The systematic radial and tangential velocity components of a star in our galactic model are given by: 10 ajf r j (R, l, b) ajf l j(R, l, b) vr = vr1 + vr2 + vr3 = vl = vl1 + vl2 + vl3 = vb = vb1 + vb2 + vb3 = 10 Xj=1 Xj=1 Xj=1 10 ajf b j (R, l, b) (A.20) where the constants aj contain combinations of the kine- matic parameters that we wish to determine: f r f r 7 = − cos"m θ − 8 = − sin"m θ − 9 = − cos"m θ − 10 = sin"m θ − f r ln ⊙ ln ⊙ tan i !# cos(l + θ) − f⊙ cos l! cos b tan i !# cos(l + θ) cos b tan i !# sin(l + θ) − f⊙ sin l! cos b ln ⊙ ln ⊙ tan i !# sin(l + θ) cos b f l 1 = sin l f l 2 = − cos l f l 3 = 0 f l 4 = cos(l + θ) − cos l f l 5 = ∆ cos(l + θ) 6 = ∆2 cos(l + θ) f l f l f l ln ⊙ ln ⊙ 7 = cos"m θ − 8 = sin"m θ − 9 = − cos"m θ − 10 = sin"m θ − tan i !# sin(l + θ) − f⊙ sin l tan i !# sin(l + θ) tan i !# cos(l + θ) − f⊙ cos l tan i !# cos(l + θ) ln ⊙ ln ⊙ f l f l a1 = U⊙ a2 = V⊙ f b 1 = cos l sin b f b 2 = sin l sin b 14 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars f b 3 = − cos b f b 4 = − [sin(l + θ) − sin l] sin b f b 5 = −∆ sin(l + θ) sin b f b 6 = −∆2 sin(l + θ) sin b f b f b f b ln ⊙ ln ⊙ 7 = cos"m θ − 8 = sin"m θ − 9 = cos"m θ − 10 = − sin"m θ − tan i !# cos(l + θ) − f⊙ cos l! sin b tan i !# cos(l + θ) sin b tan i !# sin(l + θ) − f⊙ sin l! sin b tan i !# sin(l + θ) sin b ln ⊙ ln ⊙ f b (A.22) In our resolution procedure the parameters aj are com- puted following an iterative scheme (extensively explained in Fern´andez 1998) and, from these, the kinematic param- eters U⊙, V⊙, W⊙, ar, br, ψ⊙, Πb, Θb and f⊙ are derived. With regard to the free parameters of our model, dif- ferent values for m, i, ⊙, Θ(⊙) were considered (see Sect. 7). Appendix B: simulations to check the kinematic analysis In Paper I we did numerical simulations in order to evalu- ate the biases in the kinematic model parameters (in that case, the Oort constants and the solar motion compo- nents) induced by our observational constraints and er- rors. In the present work, we have also generated sim- ulated samples in the same way, though the significant correlations detected between some parameters make it advisable, in this case, to carry out a more detailed study. In this section we present the process used to generate the simulated samples (the same as in Paper I, except for the change in the systematic contributions considered), the results we obtained and, finally, the quantification of the biases present in our real samples. B.1. Process used to generate the simulated samples To take into account the irregular spatial distribution of our stars and their observational errors, parameters de- scribing the position of each simulated pseudo-star were generated as follow: -- From each real star we generated a pseudo-star that has the same nominal position (R0, l, b) -- not affected by errors -- as the real one. -- We assumed that the angular coordinates (l, b) have negligible observational errors. -- The distance error of the pseudo-star has a distribution law: ε(R) = e− 1 σR (cid:1)2 2(cid:0) R−R0 (B.1) where σR is the individual error in the photometric distance of the real star (R0). − 1 − 1 σV (cid:1)2 2(cid:0) V −V0 σU (cid:1)2 2(cid:0) U −U0 To generate the kinematic parameters we randomly as- signed to each pseudo-star a velocity (U, V, W ) by assum- ing a cosmic dispersion (σU , σV , σW ) and a Schwarzschild distribution: v(U, V, W ) = e− 1 ϕ′ where (U0, V0, W0) are the reflex of solar motion. These components were transformed into radial velocities and proper motions in galactic coordinates using the nominal position of the pseudo-star (R0, l, b). The systematic mo- tion due to galactic rotation and spiral arm kinematics was added following Eqs. (A.4) and (A.19), obtaining the components (vr0 , µl0, µb0) for each pseudo-star. Finally, in- dividual observational errors were introduced by using the error function: σW (cid:1)2 2(cid:0) W −W0 (B.2) ε(vr, µl, µb) = e − 1 σvr (cid:1)2 2(cid:0) vr−vr0 − 1 σµl (cid:17)2 2(cid:16) µl −µl0 − 1 σµb (cid:17)2 2(cid:16) µb−µb0 (B.3) where σvr , σµl and σµb are the observational errors of the real star. At the end of this process we had the following data for each pseudo-star: galactic coordinates (R, l, b), veloc- ity parameters (vr, µl, µb), errors in the velocity parame- ters (σvr , σµl , σµb ) and error in the photometric distance (σR). The simulated radial component of those pseudo- stars generated from a real star without radial velocity was not used, thus we imposed on the simulated sample the same deficiency in radial velocity data that is present in our real sample (see Sect. 2.2 and Appendix B in Paper I for more details). Following this scheme, several sets of 50 simulated samples for both O and B stars and Cepheids were built. A classical solar motion of (U, V, W ) = (9, 12, 7) km s−1 was considered, taking the dispersion velocity compo- nents (σU , σV , σW ) = (8, 8, 5) km s−1 for O and B stars (see Paper I) and (σU , σV , σW ) = (13, 13, 6) km s−1 for Cepheids (Luri 2000). For the galactic rotation parame- ters, we chose the values ar = −2.1 km s−1 kpc−1 and br = 0.0 km s−1 kpc−2, which correspond to a linear rota- tion curve with an A Oort constant of 14.0 km s−1 kpc−1. On the other hand, for the spiral structure parameters several sets of values were used for ψ⊙ (from ψ⊙ = 0◦ to ψ⊙ = 315◦, in steps of 45◦) and Ωp (from Ωp = 10 km s−1 kpc−1 to Ωp = 40 km s−1 kpc−1, in steps of 5 km s−1 kpc−1), whereas a fixed value of fr = 0.05 was considered (Yuan 1969). From (σU , σV , σW ), ar, Ωp and fr, the values of Πb, Θb and f⊙ were inferred for each set of samples. 56 sets of 50 samples for both O and B stars and Cepheids were generated. Concerning the free parameters of our model, in a first stage we adopted classical val- ues (m = 2, i = −6◦, Lin et al. 1969; ⊙ = 8.5 kpc, D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 15 Table B.1. Parameters of the simulated samples. U⊙ V⊙ W⊙ (σU , σV , σW ) ar br fr ψ⊙ Ωp Case A Case B Case C Case D 9 km s−1 12 km s−1 7 km s−1 (8, 8, 5) km s−1 (O and B stars) (13, 13, 6) km s−1 (Cepheid stars) −2.1 km s−1 kpc−1 0.0 km s−1 kpc−2 0.05 from 0◦ to 360◦, in steps of 45◦ from 10 km s−1 kpc−1 to 40 km s−1 kpc−1, in steps of 5 km s−1 kpc−1 m = 2, i = −6◦, ⊙ = 8.5 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 220 km s−1 m = 2, i = −6◦, ⊙ = 7.1 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 184 km s−1 m = 4, i = −12◦, ⊙ = 8.5 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 220 km s−1 m = 4, i = −12◦, ⊙ = 7.1 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 184 km s−1 Θ(⊙) = 220 km s−1, Kerr & Lyndell-Bell 1986), though we also tested cases with m = 4, i = −12◦ (Amaral & L´epine 1997) and ⊙ = 7.1 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 184 km s−1 (Olling & Merrifield 1998). In Table B.1 we summarize all the adopted kinematic parameters. B.2. Results and discussion B.2.1. Results for a 2-armed model of the Galaxy A complete solution simultaneously taking into account radial velocity and proper motion data was computed. Our test showed that the number of Cepheids within 2 kpc from the Sun prevents the obtainment of reliable results. In Figs. B.1 and B.2 we show the results obtained for the simulated samples of O and B stars (0.6 < R < 2 kpc) and Cepheids (0.6 < R < 4 kpc) in case A (see Table B.1). As a first conclusion, and confirming our suspicions, a systematic trend with ψ⊙ and/or Ωp is observed in most cases. This behaviour is produced by the correlations be- tween some terms in the least squares fit, which depends on the spatial distribution of each sample. For solar motion a bias between −1.5 and 1.5 km s−1 (depending on ψ⊙ and Ωp) was found for U⊙ and V⊙, and of only −0.3 km s−1 for W⊙. For both O and B stars and Cepheids we found the bias on V⊙ and W⊙ to be indepen- dent of Ωp, with a slight dependence on ψ⊙. For ψ⊙ = 270◦ and Ωp = 10 km s−1 kpc−1 we found a large negative bias on V⊙, but with a great standard deviation. This occurred in several samples (inside this set) with serious conver- gence problems in the iteration procedure we use to solve the least squares fit. Similar problems in other cases with ψ⊙ = 270◦ will be found later. For O and B stars, the standard deviations in the solar motion components are ≈ 0.6 km s−1 for U⊙ and V⊙ (except for ψ⊙ = 270◦), and ≈ 0.3 km s−1 for W⊙. On the other hand, in the case of 2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 −0.5 ) 1 − s m k ( Θ U ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ V ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ W ∆ ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( r a ∆ −1.0 ) 2 − c p k 1 − s m k ( 0.5 0.0 −0.5 r b ∆ −1.0 40 20 0 −20 −40 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 10 0 −10 ) s e e r g e d ( Θ ψ ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( b Π ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( b Θ ∆ Θ f ∆ ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( p Ω ∆ −20 ) 1 − s m k ( Θ U σ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ V σ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ W σ 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( r a σ ) 2 − c p k 1 − s m k ( 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 r b σ 0.0 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 80 60 40 20 0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 30 20 10 0 0 90 ) s e e r g e d ( Θ ψ σ ) 1 − s m k ( b Π σ ) 1 − s m k ( b Θ σ Θ f σ ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( p Ω σ 360 180 270 ψΘ (degrees) 360 0 90 180 270 ψΘ (degrees) Fig. B.1. Bias (obtained value−simulated value; left) and standard deviation (right) for each set of 50 samples in the solar motion (top), galactic rotation (middle) and spiral arm kinematic (bottom) parameters for O and B pseudo- stars (Case A). Values of Ωp: 10 km s−1 kpc−1 (black double solid line), 15 (black solid line), 20 (grey solid line), 25 (dotted line), 30 (dashed line), 35 (long dashed line) and 40 (dot-dashed line). 16 ) 1 − s m k ( Θ U ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ V ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ W ∆ 2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 −0.5 ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( r a ∆ −1.0 ) 2 − c p k 1 − s m k ( 0.5 0.0 −0.5 r b ∆ −1.0 40 20 0 −20 −40 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 1.0 0.0 −1.0 −2.0 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 10 0 −10 ) s e e r g e d ( Θ ψ ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( b Π ∆ ) 1 − s m k ( b Θ ∆ Θ f ∆ ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( p Ω ∆ −20 ) 1 − s m k ( Θ U σ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ V σ ) 1 − s m k ( Θ W 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 σ ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( r a σ ) 2 − c p k 1 − s m k ( 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 r b σ 0.0 0 90 180 ψΘ (degrees) 270 360 80 60 40 20 0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 30 20 10 0 0 90 ) s e e r g e d ( Θ ψ σ ) 1 − s m k ( b Π σ ) 1 − s m k ( b Θ σ Θ f σ ) 1 − c p k 1 − s m k ( p Ω σ 360 180 270 ψΘ (degrees) 360 0 90 180 270 ψΘ (degrees) D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars Cepheids these values increased to ≈ 1.4-2.0 km s−1 and ≈ 0.8 km s−1, respectively. The biases found in the first- and second-order terms of the galactic rotation curve are negligible for Cepheids, with a level fluctuation of ±0.3 km s−1 kpc−1 (or km s−1 kpc−2). In this case there is a standard deviation of 1.3 for ar and 0.5 for br. For O and B stars the biases clearly depend on ψ⊙, varying from −0.7 to −0.5 km s−1 kpc−1 for ar, and from −1.0 to 0.1 km s−1 kpc−2 for br. The standard deviations are 0.8 km s−1 kpc−1 and 1.2 km s−1 kpc−2, respectively. Let us study the biases that have an effect on the de- termination of the spiral structure parameters. As a gen- eral conclusion, Figs. B.1 and B.2 show that our sample of O and B stars supplies better results than the Cepheid sample. In the case of O and B stars, we found a clear depen- dence with ψ⊙ and Ωp in ψ⊙, Πb and Θb determinations, whereas f⊙ and Ωp only show peculiar behaviour around ψ⊙ = 270◦. Concerning ψ⊙, the bias oscillates from −20◦ to 30◦. The standard deviation of the mean for the 50 samples of each set is about 10-20◦. On the other hand, for the amplitudes Πb and Θb the biases are of ±2 km s−1, with a standard deviation of about 1 km s−1. Neither f⊙ nor Ωp have a considerable bias, except for ψ⊙ = 270◦, where both biases and standard deviations go up. For Cepheid stars similar results were obtained, but with larger standard deviations in all cases. The bias in ψ⊙ changes from −20◦ to 10◦, with standard deviations of about 30-60◦. In the case of Πb, we found a clear de- pendence on both ψ⊙ and Ωp, with a bias of ±1.5 km s−1 and a standard deviation of about 2 km s−1. On the other hand, for Θb the bias is smaller, from 0 to 0.8 km s−1, and the standard deviation is 1-1.5 km s−1. As for O and B stars, for f⊙ and Ωp small biases are found, though the standard deviations are larger in this case. B.2.2. Results considering possible errors in the choice of the free parameters An interesting point to analyse is the study of the biases produced by a bad choice of the free parameters in our model (m, i, ⊙, Θ(⊙)). In the same way as in the previous section, we simulated 50 samples for each one of the cases considered in the real resolution, i.e. cases A, B, C and D (see Table B.2). The simulated parameters were the same as in Table B.1 for solar motion and galactic rotation. For spiral arm kinematics, we considered ψ⊙ = 315◦ and Ωp = 30 km s−1 kpc−1 (similar values to those obtained from real samples; see Sect. 6). In Table B.2 we show the biases and standard devia- tions when solving the model equations in crossed solu- tions (e.g. we generated 50 simulated samples considering the free parameters in case A, and then we solved equa- tions using the free parameters adopted for cases A, B, C and D, and so on for the other cases). As a first conclusion, we can observe that a bad choice in the free parameters Fig. B.2. Bias (obtained value−simulated value; left) and standard deviation (right) for each set of 50 samples in the solar motion (top), galactic rotation (middle) and spiral arm kinematic (bottom) parameters for Cepheid pseudo- stars (Case A). Values of Ωp: 10 km s−1 kpc−1 (black double solid line), 15 (black solid line), 20 (grey solid line), 25 (dotted line), 30 (dashed line), 35 (long dashed line) and 40 (dot-dashed line). D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars 17 Table B.2. Bias and standard deviation in ψ⊙ and Ωp for crossed solutions for the simulated samples of O and B stars and Cepheids. Units: ψ⊙ in degrees; Ωp in km s−1 kpc−1. Cepheid stars with 0.6 < R < 4 kpc O and B stars with 0.6 < R < 2 kpc Case A Case B Case C Case D Case A Case B Case C Case D ∆ψ⊙ σψ⊙ ∆Ωp σΩp ∆ψ⊙ σψ⊙ ∆Ωp σΩp ∆ψ⊙ σψ⊙ ∆Ωp σΩp ∆ψ⊙ σψ⊙ ∆Ωp σΩp 23. 28. 2.2 6.2 32. 34. 0.7 7.1 18. 24. 6.7 6.5 29. 31. 4.3 7.1 17. 27. 3.1 7.3 24. 32. 1.9 8.0 14. 23. 8.2 7.3 23. 29. 6.3 8.2 24. 25. −1.1 2.9 32. 31. −1.6 3.8 17. 21. 1.2 2.9 25. 27. 0.2 3.7 25. 30. −1.3 3.9 19. 25. −0.8 3.5 Case A simulated −11. 65. −4.3 18.9 Case B simulated 0. 83. −4.3 16.2 Case C simulated 4. 62. −2.4 25.1 Case D simulated 9. 84. −3.9 17.1 14. 21. 2.0 3.3 21. 26. 1.1 3.8 0. 61. −3.5 16.6 4. 75. −14.3 52.8 2. 58. −1.1 21.5 10. 78. −4.9 19.5 −2. 71. −2.5 8.8 −11. 82. −4.3 7.0 −2. 60. −1.0 10.9 −9. 81. −3.2 7.8 3. 71. −4.0 7.3 1. 78. −4.1 8.1 10. 63. −3.0 9.2 1. 73. −2.8 8.6 does not substantially alter the derived kinematic param- eters, particularly ψ⊙. In other words, for each set of sim- ulated samples we obtained nearly the same values for the parameters whether we solved the Eqs. (8) with the cor- rect set of free parameters or with a wrong combination of them. Differences in ψ⊙ do not exceed 10◦ for O and B stars and 20◦ for Cepheids. In the case of Ωp we found large differences in some cases, but always when the stan- dard deviation was also large. This is especially true for Cepheids. A remarkable point is that the minimum bias was not always produced when we properly chose the free parameters. B.2.3. Conclusions In the light of these results, we conclude that we are able to determine the kinematic parameters of the proposed model of the Galaxy from the real star samples described in Sect. 2, supposing that the velocity field of the stars is well described by this model. We studied case A (m = 2, i = −6◦, ⊙ = 8.5 kpc, Θ(⊙) = 220 km s−1 in detail in these simulations, but we also looked at the other combi- nations of the free parameters (cases B, C and D), with similar conclusions. Nevertheless, the study of crossed so- lutions has shown that it will be very difficult to decide between the several set of free parameters discussed in Sect. 6 (see also Table B.2), owing to the small differences obtained when changing the free parameters in the condi- tion equations. References Amaral, L.H., & L´epine, J.R.D. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 885 Avedisova, V.S. 1989, Astrophysics (Tr. Astrofizika), 30, 83 Bash, F.N. 1981, ApJ, 250, 551 Battinelli, P. 1991, A&A, 244, 69 Beaulieu, J.-P. 1999, private communication Bok, B.J. 1958, Observatory, 79, 58 Bok, B.J., & Bok, P.F. 1974, The Milky Way, Cambridge, Harvard University Press Burton, W.B. 1971, A&A, 10, 76 Burton, W.B. 1976, ARA&A, 14, 275 Byl, J., & Ovenden, M.W. 1978, ApJ, 225, 496 Comer´on, F., & Torra, J. 1991, A&A, 241, 57 Comer´on, F., Torra, J., & G´omez, A.E. 1994, A&A, 286, 789 Cr´ez´e, M., & Mennessier, M.O. 1973, A&A, 27, 281 Drimmel, R. 2000, A&A, 358, L13 Elmegreen, D.M. 1985, The Milky Way galaxy, eds. H. van Worden, R.J. Allen, W.B. Burton, IAU Symposium 106, 255 Englmaier, P., & Gerhard, O. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 512 ESA 1997, The Hipparcos Catalogue, ESA SP-1200 Feast, M.W., & Catchpole, R.M. 1997, MNRAS, 286, L1 Feast, M.W., & Whitelock, P.A. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 683 Feast, M.W., Pont, F., & Whitelock, P.A. 1998, MNRAS, 298, L43 Fern´andez, D. 1998, Degree of Physics (Master Thesis), Universitat de Barcelona, Spain (available in Spanish lan- guage from http://www.am.ub.es/∼dfernand) Fernie, J.D., Beattie, B., Evans, N.R., & Seager, S. 1995, IBVS, 4148 Frink, S., Fuchs, B., Roser, S., & Wielen, R. 1996, A&A, 314, 430 Garmany, C.D., & Stencel, R.E. 1992, A&AS, 94, 211 Georgelin, Y.M., & Georgelin, Y.P. 1976, A&A, 49, 57 G´omez, A., & Mennessier, M.O. 1977, A&A, 54, 113 18 D. Fern´andez et al.: Kinematics of young stars Glushkova, E.V., Dambis, A.K., Mel'nik, A.M., & Rastorguev, A.S. 1998, A&A, 329, 514 Grenier, S. 1997, private communication Hauck, B., & Mermilliod, J.C. 1998, A&AS, 129, 431 Kerr, F.J. 1969 ARA&A, 7, 39 Kerr, F.J., & Lynden-Bell, D. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 1023 L´epine, J.R.D., Mishurov, Yu.N., & Dedikov, S.Yu. 2001, AJ, 546, 234 Lin, C.C., & Shu, F.H. 1964, ApJ, 140, 646 Lin, C.C., Yuan, C., & Shu, F.H. 1969, ApJ, 155, 721 Luri, X., 2000, private communication Maciel, W.J. 1993 Ap&SS, 206, 285 Marochnik, L.S., Mishurov, Yu.N., & Suchkov, A.A. 1972, Ap&SS, 19, 285 Mel'nik, A.M., & Efremov, Yu.N. 1995, Astro. Lett., 21, 10 Mel'nik, A.M., Sitnik, T.G., Dambis, A.K., Efremov, Yu.N., & Rastorguev, A.S. 1998, Astro. Lett., 24, 594 Mel'nik, A.M., Dambis, A.K., & Rastorguev, A.S. 1999, Astro. Lett., 25, 518 Mennessier, M.O., & Cr´ez´e, M. 1975, in "La dynamique des galaxies spirales", colloque n◦241, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris Mermilliod, J.C. 1986, A&AS, 63, 293 Metzger, M.R., Caldwell, J.A.R., & Schechter, P.L. 1998, AJ, 115, 635 Mishurov, Yu.N., Zenina, I.A., Dambis, A.K., Mel'nik, A.M., & Rastorguev, A.S. 1997, A&A, 323, 775 Mishurov, Yu.N., & Zenina, I.A. 1999, A&A, 341, 81 Olano, C.A. 2001, AJ, 121, 295 Olling, R.P., & Merrifield, M.R. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 943 Pont, F., Mayor, M., & Burki, G. 1994, A&A, 285, 415 Pont, F., Queloz, D., Bratschi, P., & Mayor, M. 1997, A&A, 318, 416 Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., & Flannery, B.P. 1992, Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Racine, R., & Harris, W.E. 1989, AJ, 98, 1609 Rastorguev, A.S., Glushkova, E.V., Zabolotskikh, M.V., & Baumgardt, H. 2001, Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions, in press Reid, M.J. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 345 Roberts Jr., W.W. 1969, ApJ, 158, 123 Roberts Jr., W.W. 1970, The spiral structure of our galaxy, eds. W. Becker, G. Contopoulos, IAU Symposium 38, 415 Rohlfs, K. 1977, Lectures in density waves, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Royer, F. 1999, PhD Thesis, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, France Schild R. 1967, ApJ, 148, 449 Schmidt, M. 1965, Galactic structure, eds. A. Blaauw and M. Schmidt, University Chicago Press, Chicago Schmidt-Kaler, T. 1975, Vistas Astron., 19, 69 Stibbs, D.W.N. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 453 Toomre, A. 1969, ApJ, 158, 899 Torra, J., Fern´andez, D., & Figueras, F. 2000, A&A, 359, 82 (Paper I) Vall´ee, J.P. 1995, ApJ, 454, 119 Yuan, C. 1969, ApJ, 158, 889
astro-ph/9909162	1	9909	1999-09-09T19:22:57	Can Light Echoes Account for the Slow Decay of Type IIn Supernovae?	[ "astro-ph" ]	The spectra of type IIn supernovae indicate the presence of apre-existing slow, dense circumstellar wind (CSW). If the CSW extends sufficiently far from the progenitor star, then dust formation should occur in the wind. The light from the supernova explosion will scatter off this dust and produce a light echo. Continuum emission seen after the peak will have contributions from both this echo as well as from the shock of the ejecta colliding with the CSW, with a fundamental question of which source dominates the continuum. We calculate the brightness of the light echo as a function of time for a range of dust shell geometries, and use our calculations to fit to the light curves of SN 1988Z and SN 1997ab, the two slowest declining IIn supernovae on record. We find that the light curves of both objects can be reproduced by the echo model. However, their rate of decay from peak, color at peak and their observed peak absolute magnitudes when considered together are inconsistent with the echo model. Furthermore, when the observed values of M$_{B}$ are corrected for the effects of dust scattering, the values obtained imply that these supernovae have unrealistically high luminosities. We conclude that light echoes cannot properly account for the slow decline seen in some IIn's, and that the shock interaction is likely to dominate the continuum emission.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Can Light Echoes Account for the Slow Decay of Type IIn Supernovae? Bruce Roscherr and Bradley E. Schaefer Physics Department, Yale University, PO Box 208120, New Haven, CT, 06520-8121; [email protected], [email protected] Received ; accepted 9 9 9 1 p e S 9 1 v 2 6 1 9 0 9 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a -- 2 -- ABSTRACT The spectra of type IIn supernovae indicate the presence of apre-existing slow, dense circumstellar wind (CSW). If the CSW extends sufficiently far from the progenitor star, then dust formation shouldoccur in the wind. The light from the supernova explosion will scatter off this dust and produce a light echo. Continuum emission seen after the peak will have contributions from both this echo as well as from the shock of the ejecta colliding with the CSW, with a fundamental question of which source dominates the continuum. We calculate the brightness of the light echo as a function of time for a range of dust shell geometries, and use our calculations to fit to the light curves of SN 1988Z and SN 1997ab, the two slowest declining IIn supernovae on record. We find that the light curves of both objects can be reproduced by the echo model. However, their rate of decay from peak, color at peak and their observed peak absolute magnitudes when considered together are inconsistent with the echo model. Furthermore, when the observed values of MB are corrected for the effects of dust scattering, the values obtained imply that these supernovae have unrealistically high luminosities. We conclude that light echoes cannot properly account for the slow decline seen in some IIn's, and that the shock interaction is likely to dominate the continuum emission. -- 3 -- 1. Introduction Supernovae are designated to be of type IIn based on their spectra (Schelegel 1990). The group is quite heterogeneous, but a typical IIn would have the following properties: an Hα profile composed of a narrow peak (∼ 100 km/s) sitting on a broad base (∼ 104 km/s), no P Cygni absorption feature, a strong blue continuum, and slow spectral evolution. There is occasionally an intermediate width component (∼ 2000 km/s) to the Hα line. Absorption lines tend to be weak or absent. The narrow Hα component is seen to vary in intensity and has thus been interpreted to indicate the presence of a pre-existing slow-moving stellar wind. These winds can be very dense, with M as high as 10−2 M⊙/yr as is the case with SN1997ab (Salamanca et.al. 1998). The overall spectral properties of these supernovae have successfully been interpreted as being due to a shock interaction between the rapidly expanding supernova ejecta and this dense (106 − 108cm−3) stellar wind (Chevalier & Fransson 1985, Chugai 1991, Terlevich 1994). IIn's comprise about 5% of observed type II supernovae. A number of IIn's show an abnormally slow decline in their light curves. SN1997ab and SN 1988Z are the extreme examples of this, both declining by only about 5 magnitudes in 1000 days. Simple models of the shock interaction suggest that the shock can produce sufficient optical continuum emission to account for this slow decline (Terlevich 1994, Plewa 1995). It was suggested by Chugai(1992) that light echoes might also provide a significant contribution to the late time light curves of IIn's, i.e. the observed continuum should be a combination of shock and echo contributions. When the supernova explodes, it vaporizes any dust in the CSW out to a radius of ∼ 1016 cm (Pearce & Mayes 1986). Any dust that lies outside this evaporation radius will scatter the supernova light. Scattered light travels a longer path before reaching us and so is delayed relative to any unscattered light, i.e. a light echo is produced. As little as 10−6M⊙ of dust is required to make the circumstellar -- 4 -- shell of matter optically thick to dust scattering. We here investigate whether light echoes could help account for the slow decline in the light curve seen in some IIn's. We have performed a detailed calculation of the light echo produced by a range of dust shell geometries. Our assumptions and method of calculation are described in the next section. Our results are presented in Section 3, and in Section 4 we fit to the observed light curves of SN 1988Z and SN 1997ab. Section 5 is devoted to the discussion of our results. 2. Calculating the Light Echo The light echo in the U, B, V , and R bands was computed by a Monte Carlo simulation. The calculation requires knowledge of the dust size distribution, the dust spatial distribution, the optical properties of the dust, and the underlying Type II supernova light curve. The dust was assumed to be composed of a mixture of silicon and graphite grains, in the ratio 3:1 by number. Both grain types were assumed to have a grain size distribution described by the MRN grain model (e.g. Evans 1994), i.e. the number density of grains varies as n(a) ∝ a−3.5 where a is the grain diameter. Our grain size ranged from amin = 0.005µm up to amax = 1.0µm. We assumed that the dust lies in a spherical shell of inner radius Rmin and outer radius Rmax about the star. Rmin is the radius out to which the supernova evapourates all the dust in the CSW. Rmin can be estimated from first principles and for a type II supernova has a value of a few times 1016 cm (Pearce & Mayes 1986). We used this value as a guide, and took both Rmin and Rmax to be free parameters. We assumed that the dust density in the shell varies as ρ(r) ∝ r−2. The amount of dust in the shell is characterized by τ , the R -- 5 -- band optical depth for a purely radial photon trajectory. The total dust mass is related to τ by the following expression: Mdust = 8π τ max − a0.5 min(cid:17) RmaxRmin (f ρgr + (1 − f )ρSi) × 3 (cid:16)a0.5 R amax amin da a−1.5Pi=abs,scat (f Qi,gr + (1 − f )Qi,Si) = 7.0 × 10−7 τ Rmin 0.01pc! Rmax 1.0pc! M⊙ (1) where f = 0.25, ρgr = 2.5g cm−3 and ρSi = 2.35g cm−3 are the densities of graphite and silicon respectively, and Qabs and Qscat are the absorption and scattering efficiencies. The photons are either absorbed by the dust, or they scatter elastically. The cross sections for the dust-photon interactions are functions of both the photon wavelength and the dust grain size. We used the scattering and absorption cross sections, σabs(= 4πa2Qabs) and σscat(= 4πa2Qscat), calculated by Draine(1987). The angular distribution for the scattering is given by the Henyey-Greenstein function (Henyey & Greenstein 1941), F (θ) = 1 − g2 (1 + g2 − 2g cos θ)3/2 (2) where g is the degree of forward scattering and is a function of wavelength and grain size. Values for g were also taken from Draine(1987). We used the composite II-L and II-P light curves calculated by Doggett and Branch(1985) as input. They provide averaged light curves for the B and V bands. We took the U and B bands to be initially identical, and likewise the V and R. The input supernova was taken to have B − V = 0 at peak. EDITOR: PLACE FIGURE 1 HERE. Our Monte Carlo code follows the photon trajectories in three dimensions. It keeps track of the time delay for each photon, as well as the photon weight. The weight was -- 6 -- decreased at each interaction by the absorption probability. The photon was also split at each interaction into a part which has no further interactions and thus escapes, and a second part which is forced to interact at least once more. This substantially improves the output statistics. Our code was tested against a number of analytical test cases, and also against the calculations of Chevalier(1986), who calculated light echoes in the limit of low optical depth. Our code produces the R band light curve as well as the V − R, B − V , and U − B colors as output. The output is dependent on the choice of Rmin, Rmax, and τ . 106 input photons were used to calculate each band for each choice of the model parameters. Our output does not include any contribution from line emission. 3. Results Our echo model has three parameters: Rmin, Rmax and τ . Figures 2,3, and 4 show the effect of varying each of these in turn. EDITOR: PLACE FIGURE 2 HERE. EDITOR: PLACE FIGURE 3 HERE. EDITOR: PLACE FIGURE 4 HERE. We see from the figures that the echo is fairly insensitive to both Rmin and Rmax as long as the shell is thicker than a few hundredths of a parsec. As the shell becomes thinner, the light curves fall off faster, and more closely trace the intrinsic light curve. We can also -- 7 -- see that the presence of a small amount of dust has a pronounced effect on the light curve at late times. The optical depths in the U, B, V and R bands are always in the ratio 1.56:1.35:1.20:1.00. The V − R, B − V and U − B colors remain nearly constant after about 200 days for all the non-thin shell cases. For the the thin shells the colors tend to redden at late times. While there are variations amongst models, the following relations serve as useful approximations: (U − B)peak ∼ 0.17τ , (B − V )peak ∼ (V − R)peak ∼ 0.15τ ∆mU ∼ 1.4τ , ∆mB ∼ 1.3τ , ∆mV ∼ 1.1τ, ∆mR ∼ 0.95τ β100,U ∼ 4.3 − 1.5τ, β100,B ∼ 4.3 − 1.4τ , β100,V ∼ 4.0 − 1.2τ, β100,R ∼ 4.0 − 1.1τ ∆m is the number of magnitudes by which the peak of the light curve has faded due to dust scattering compared to the peak in the composite type II light curve, and β100 is the number of magnitudes by which the light curve drops from peak over the first 100 days after peak. 4. Fits to SN 1988Z and SN 1997ab SN 1988Z and SN 1997ab are the two slowest declining IIn's on record. (SN 1995N has a similar decay rate, but data on this object is not yet available). The slow decline suggests that these objects are embedded in a dense CSW. This is bourne out by analysis of the spectra of these objects. Salamanca et.al.(1998) calculate that the electron density in the CSW of SN 1997ab has a value close to 108 cm−3. Chugai(1992) found a similar result for SN 1988Z. We have used our echo model to fit to the light curves of these two supernovae. -- 8 -- 4.1. SN 1988Z SN 1988Z was discovered on 1988 December 12 in the galaxy MGC+03-28-022 (Cappelloro & Turatto, 1988). The supernova was past peak at this time, but its high luminosity (mB = 16.75, MB = -18.3 for H0 = 65 kms−1Mpc−1) argues that the maximum occured not long before discovery. The supernova faded monotonically at an unusually slow rate. Over the first 137 days it faded by only 1.5 magnitudes in both the B and V bands, whereas the composite II-L light curve drops by some 5 magnitudes over the same period. The color evolution of SN 1988Z is very unusual (Turatto et.al. 1993). Over the first 100 days B − V decreases from 0.4 to 0.1 mag. The supernova then becomes redder, until the color reaches a constant value of about 0.65 mag after 700 days. Figure 5 shows our fit to the B and V band light curves of SN 1988Z. The B band fit corresponds to τ = 2.0 ±0.2, Rmin = 0.10 ±0.02 pc, Rmax = 0.35 ±0.05 pc. This corresponds to a dust mass in the shell of (eq. (1)) (4.9 ± 1.1) × 10−6M⊙. The narrow component of the Hα line is unresolved, so if we adopt a value of 100 kms−1 for the wind velocity, and assume a constant mass loss rate, we infer that the progenitor star emitted material for about 3400 years before going supernova at a rate of (1.3 ± 0.3) × 10−6 (cid:16) fdust where fdust is the fraction of the wind mass which has formed into dust. The fit to the B 10−3(cid:17)−1 M⊙yr−1, band determines the fit to the V band, i.e. the V band is not fit separately. In both cases, the fit is reasonably good up to about 800 days, after which the observed light curves are seen to flatten significantly with respect to the model predictions. EDITOR: PLACE FIGURE 5 HERE. -- 9 -- 4.2. SN 1997ab SN 1997ab was discovered on 1996 April 11 in the galaxy HS 0948+2018 (Hagen & Reimers 1997). It had a B magnitude of 14.7 which corresponds to an absolute magnitude, MB = −19.1 (H0 = 65kms−1Mpc−1). The date of peak is uncertain, but the high luminosity at discovery argues that the peak had occured recently. The light curve of this object is unfortunately not well sampled, there being only three other B band observations and two V band observation since discovery (Hagen, Engels & Reimers 1997, Schaefer & Roscherr 1998, 1999). Our model fits the B band light curve (figure 6) for τ = 3.0 ± 0.3, Rmin = 0.10 ± 0.02 pc, Rmax = 0.30 ± 0.05 pc. This implies a dust mass in the shell of (6.3 ± 1.4) × 10−6M⊙. The wind velocity is measured to be 90 kms−1, and so we infer that the progenitor emitted material for some 3000 years before going supernova at an average rate of (2.9 ± 0.7) × 10−6 (cid:16) fdust 10−3(cid:17)−1 M⊙yr−1. Salamanca et.al. (1998) find a mass loss rate of approximately 10−2M⊙yr−1 from the analysis of the spectrum of this object. They find that the emitted material lies in a shell that extends no more than 0.05pc from the progenitor. This implies that the progenitor had a brief episode of strong mass loss shortly before going supernova. The material emited during this episode lies too close to the star to allow any dust formed to survive the supernova explosion. The dust which is responsible for the echo must have been emitted during an earlier, more sustained period of lower mass loss. EDITOR: PLACE FIGURE 6 HERE. -- 10 -- 5. Echo Model versus Shock Model If the progenitors of Type II supernovae emit material for more than a few hundered years prior to going supernova, then they should be surrounded by a dusty CSW. All the dust that lies beyond the evapouration radius of the supernova will scatter the supernova light and produce a light echo. There is likely to be an echo component in the light curves of many Type II supernovae, the only quesiton is how significant a component it is. We have seen in the previous section that the echo model can provide reasonably good fits to the light curves of SN 1988Z and SN 1997ab. Chugai(1992), however, produced a similar quality fit to the light curve of SN 1988Z with a simple model of the shock continuum emission. Fits to the light curves alone are thus not sufficient to discriminate between the models. In figure 7 we have plotted(B − V )peaK against β100,B. The region between the two solid lines is the region of parameter space allowed by the echo model. As the amount of circumstellar dust increases, we expect the supernova light to suffer more scatterings, producing an echo that becomes progressively redder and longer lived. In shock models the optical light is primarily produced by the reprocessing of X-rays. The color of the optical light produced in this way is not very sensitive to the amount of circumstellar material present, so on the plot of (B − V )peak versus β100,B, we do not expect to see a correlation. SN 1988Z and SN 1997ab both lie within the region allowed by the echo model. The other IIn's plotted on the figure, however, do not. Their distribution shows no definite correlation, and is thus consistent with the shock model prediction. The IIn's plotted represent the complete sample for which (B − V )peak, β100,B, and MB,peak are available in the literature (Patat et.al. 1994). The data for SN 1998S was taken from the CfA Supernova Group website. In figure 8 we have plotted the observed MB,peak versus β100,B. In the echo model, for a -- 11 -- given underlying supernova luminosity, as the dust mass increases, the decay rate decreases and the observed MB,peak increases, i.e. the supernova appears fainter as more of the emission at peak is scattered by the dust. The opposite trend is expected for shock models, i.e. we expect the peak luminosity to increase as the amount of circumstellar material increases. In an MB,peak versus β100,B plot, shock models thus predict a downward sloping line. The observed IIn points are consistent with the shock prediction, and inconsistent with the prediction of the echo model. In particular, the points for both SN 1997ab and SN 1988Z lie outside the region allowed by the echo model. In figure 9 we have plotted the observed MB,peak versus (B − V )peak. The echo model predicts that the emission should redden as the amount of dust, and thus MB,peak, increases. The observed data points are inconsistent with this prediction. Another argument against the echo model is the implied values for MB,peak for the underlying supernovae. SN 1988Z had an observed MB,peak of -18.3 and SN 1997ab, -19.1. If we use the values of τ , Rmin and Rmax obtained from the fits to the light curves to find ∆mB, we find that the underlying supernovae must have had MB,peak of -20.9 in the case of SN 1988Z, and -22.8 for SN 1997ab. This would make these supernovae by far the brightest Type II supernovae yet observed. We conclude that light echoes cannot properly account for the slow decline seen in some IIn's. The predictions of shock models are consistent with the data, and shocks are likely to dominate the continuum emission. The absence of a strong echo component in the light curves of IIn's argues that the progenitors of these supernovae undergo the bulk of their mass loss just prior to going supernova, and thus very little dust survives the explosion. -- 12 -- REFERENCES Cappellaro, E. and Turatto, M. 1988,IAU Circ. No. 4691 Chevalier, R.A., & Fransson, C. 1985, In: Supernovae as Distance Indicators, ed. Bartel, N., Springer, Berlin Chevalier, R.A. 1986,Ap.J.,308,225 Chugai, N.N. 1991,MNRAS,250,513 Chugai, N.N. 1992,Sov.Astron.,36,63 Doggett, J.B., & Branch, D. 1985,A.J.,90,2303 Draine, B.T. 1987,Princeton Observatory Preprints POP213 Evans, A. 1994,The Dusty Universe, John Wiley & Sons, New York Hagen, H.J., Engels, D., & Reimers, D. 1997,A&A,324, L29 Hagen, H.J., & Reimers, D. 1997,IAU Circ. No. 6589 Henyey, L.G., & Greenstein, J.L. 1941,Ap.J.,93, 70 Patat, F., Barbon, R., Cappellaro, E., & Turatto, M. 1994,A&A,282, 731 Pearce, G., & Mayes, A.J. 1986,A&A,155,291 Plewa, T. 1995,MNRAS,275,143 Salamanca, I. et.al. 1998,MNRAS,300,L17 Schaefer, B.E., & Roscherr, B. 1998,IAU Circ. No. 7058 Schaefer, B.E., & Roscherr, B. 1999,IAU Circ. No. 7141 -- 13 -- Schlegel, E.M. 1990,MNRAS,244,269 Terlevich, R.J. 1994, In:Circumstellar Media in the Late Stages of Stellar Evolution, ed. Clegg, R.E.S., Stevens, I.R., & Meikle, W.P.S., Cambridge University Press,153 Turatto, M. 1993,et.al.,MNRAS,262,128 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. -- 14 -- Fig. 1. -- (a) and (b) respectively show the composite II-L and the composite II-P light curves used as input for the echo calculations. (c) and (d) show the values of B − V for each set of composite curves Doggert & Branch(1985). Fig. 2. -- The effect on the light curves due to changes in τ . Rmin and Rmax are held fixed at 0.1 and 1.0 pc respectively. (a) and (b) show the R band light curve for input II-L and II-P respectively. The remaining plots are for V − R, B − V and U − B for each of the two sets of input. The curves have been shifted downward by ∆ mags for clarity. Fig. 3. -- The effect of changes in Rmin. The curves are for Rmin = 0.01, 0.5, 0.95 and 0.99 pc. τ is held fixed at 1.0 and Rmax at 1.0 pc. (a) and (b) show the R band light curve for input II-L and II-P respectively. The remaining plots are for V − R, B − V and U − B for each of the two sets of input. The curves have been shifted downward by ∆ mags for clarity. Fig. 4. -- The effect of changes in Rmax. The curves are for Rmax = 0.11, 0.15, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 pc. τ is held fixed at 1.0 and Rmin at 0.1 pc. (a) and (b) show the R band light curve for input II-L and II-P respectively. The remaining plots are for V − R, B − V and U − B for each of the two sets of input. The curves have been shifted downward by ∆ mags for clarity. Fig. 5. -- Fit to the B (crosses) and V (circles) band light curves of SN 1988Z (Turatto et.al. 1993). Fig. 6. -- Fit to the B (crosses) and V (circles) band light curves of SN 1997ab. Fig. 7. -- Plot of (B − V )peak versus β100,B. The area between the solid lines are the values allowed by the echo model. The underlying supernova was taken to have B − V = 0 at peak. Fig. 8. -- Plot of MB,peak versus β100,B. MB,peak for the underlying supernova was allowed to range between -16 and -19. -- 15 -- Fig. 9. -- Plot of MB,peak versus (B − V )peak. For the underlying supernova, MB,peak was allowed to range between -16 and -19, and we assumed (B − V )peak = 0. 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 SN 1997ab SN 1987B SN 1988Z echo model SN 1987F SN 1998S SN 1984E SN 1989C SN 1983K 0 2 4 6 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 0 SN 1983K SN 1997ab SN 1987F SN 1988Z echo model SN 1998S SN 1989C SN 1987B SN 1984E 2 4 6 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 SN 1983K SN 1997ab SN 1987F SN 1998S SN 1988Z SN 1989C SN 1987B SN 1984E echo model -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
astro-ph/0202005	1	0202	2002-01-31T23:27:04	A Cosmic Perspective from Lapland in 2001	[ "astro-ph" ]	A convergence of ideas, observations and technology have led to the greatest period of cosmological discovery yet. Over the past three years we have determined the basic features of our Universe. We are now challenged to make sense of what we have found. The outcome of planned experiments and observations as well as new ideas will be required. If we succeed, ours truly will be a Golden Age of Cosmology.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A Cosmic Perspective from Lapland in 2001 MICHAEL S. TURNER1 Center for Cosmological Physics Departments of Astronomy & Astrophysics and of Physics Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago Chicago, IL 60637-1433, USA NASA/Fermilab Astrophysics Center Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL 60510-0500, USA E-mail: [email protected] A convergence of ideas, observations and technology have led to the great- est period of cosmological discovery yet. Over the past three years we have determined the basic features of our Universe. We are now challenged to make sense of what we have found. The outcome of planned experiments and ob- servations as well as new ideas will be required. If we succeed, ours truly will be a Golden Age of Cosmology. PRESENTED AT COSMO-01 Rovaniemi, Finland, August 29 -- September 4, 2001 1Work supported by the NASA at Fermilab and the DOE at Chicago and Fermilab. 1 How Did We Get Here? Cosmology is currently in its most exciting period ever. However, the past hundred years haven't been too bad either. In 1916, Einstein introduced general relativity, the first theoretical framework up to describing the evolution of the Universe. In the next decade, Hubble established the extragalactic nature of the nebulae and put forth the first systematic evidence for the expansion of the Universe. This burst of activity was powered by ideas -- general relativity -- and technology -- big telescopes on high mountains -- and marked the beginning of modern cosmology. Cosmology then stalled for some twenty years. During that time, the 100-inch Mt. Wilson telescope and its counterpart at the Lick Observatory charted only a few hundred galaxies, with redshifts less than z = 0.1 [1]. Most of the Universe lay beyond their reach. While some important new theoretical ideas were introduced, most notably the idea of a hot big bang by Gamow and his collaborators, theory did little to push things forward either. First light at the 200-inch Hale telescope on Palomar and the steady state vs. hot big bang controversy signaled the beginning of a new period of discovery around 1950. Once again, it was the combination of theory and observation that propelled the field forward. The discovery of quasars and radio-source counts murdered cosmology's most beautiful theory -- the steady state -- in the early 1960s. I note the important role played here by a strong theory -- that is, one that makes sharp predictions and is therefore easily falsified. Because the steady state predicts a nonevolving Universe, any evidence of evolution can falsify it (here, the distribution of radio sources vs. their strength and the large abundance of quasars seen at high redshift). The discovery of the cosmic background radiation in 1964 by Penzias and Wilson broke things wide open, and cosmology became a legitimate branch of physics. The details of Gamow's nucleosynthesis scheme were worked out in detail and became big- bang nucleosynthesis, and the large mass fraction of 4He predicted by the hot big-bang model became its first success. In Chapter 15 of his influential text, Gravitation and Cosmology, Steven Weinberg laid out "The Standard Cosmology" and coined the term [2]. The Standard Cosmology meant the hot big-bang model, from shortly before the epoch of big-bang nucleosynthesis to the present. A convergence of ideas (a better understanding of general relativity and the careful application of physics to the early Universe) and observations (the discovery of the cosmic microwave background) again had powered a significant advance our understanding of the Universe. According to Weinberg's same text, the period before BBN (t <∼ 10−4 sec) was "cosmos incognito" (cf, Section 15.11). He recognized quite correctly that the key to further progress was a better understanding of the elementary particles. A subatomic world of strongly interacting particles with exponentially rising numbers, which was the world view of subatomic physics then, leads to a maximum temperature and a breakdown of any simple statistical mechanical treatment. 1 The breakthrough came in the mid 1970s with the emergence of the standard model of particle physics and its point-like quark/lepton constituents with asymptotically weak interactions. The grander ideas about unification of the strong and electroweak interac- tions (GUTs) that came somewhat later were even more influential. Asymptotically free gauge theories, GUTs and the sturdy framework of the hot big-bang fueled a decade of very fertile speculation about the early Universe in the 1980s ("the go-go junk bond days of early-Universe cosmology"). There was optimism that the marriage of ideas about unification with early-Universe cosmology could solve some of the most pressing questions in cosmology. The puzzles at the time included [3]: What is the origin of the baryon asymmetry? Why is the Universe so smooth, flat, and old? How did the primeval lumpiness that seeded all structure arise? What is the dark matter? And the marriage brought a new problem: the glut of superheavy magnetic monopoles expected from the GUT phase transition (about one per baryon!). Grand ideas, clever scenarios, and interesting schemes were suggested -- topological defects, baryogenesis, particle dark matter, phase transitions, inflation, superheavy relics, superconducting cosmic strings, unstable relics, colored relics, relics produced by the decay of other relics, hot dark matter, cold dark matter, warm dark matter, shadow worlds, mirror worlds, parallel universes, and on and on. It was a fantastic time for theorists. A handful of these ideas stood the test of time. In the go-go 80s, that meant surviving more than a month without being falsified, being replaced by a better idea, or going out of style. The survivors -- particle dark matter, inflation, topological defects, and baryogenesis -- began to form the basis of a new cosmological framework. However, only a few years later, the very beautiful idea that topological defects seeded large-scale structure was killed by cosmic microwave background measurements that began to show a series of well formed acoustic peaks. (Only adiabatic density perturbations lead to such a structure in the CMB power spectrum.) Inflation and cold dark matter survived the cut. Moreover, they were expansive and eminently testable. Theorists like to think (and with some good reason) that the tremen- dous growth in observational cosmology over the past decade has something to do with how powerful their ideas are. Technology -- the advent of large format CCDs, 6-meter, 8-meter, and 10-meter ground based telescopes, the Hubble Space Telescope, HEMTs, bolometers and large-scale computing -- of course played a role too. An avalanche of data, which has made cosmological phenomenology possible and the term "precision cosmology" a reality, started in the mid 1990s. And there is no end in sight. We are now in the midst of a great period of cosmic discovery. Once again, it came about through a convergence of ideas and technology. Thus far, we have determined the basic features of our Universe, which are pointing to a new standard cosmological model. While we learned much about the Universe, we still have much more to understand. 2 2 The New Cosmology Over the past three years a New Cosmology has been emerging. It incorporates the highly successful standard hot big-bang cosmology [2, 4] and may extend our understanding of the Universe to times as early as 10−32 sec, when the largest structures in the Universe were still subatomic quantum fluctuations. This New Cosmology is characterized by • Flat, critical density accelerating Universe • Early period of rapid expansion (inflation) • Density inhomogeneities produced from quantum fluctuations during inflation • Composition: 2/3 dark energy; 1/3 dark matter; 1/200 bright stars • Matter content: (29 ± 4)% cold dark matter; (4 ± 1)% baryons; >∼ 0.3% neutrinos • T0 = 2.725 ± 0.001 K • t0 = 14 ± 1 Gyr • H0 = 72 ± 7 km s−1 Mpc−1 The New Cosmology is not as well established as the standard hot big-bang cosmology. However, the evidence is growing. 2.1 Mounting Evidence: Recent Results The position of the first acoustic peak in the multipole power spectrum of the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation provides a powerful means of de- termining the global curvature of the Universe. With the recent DASI observations of CMB anisotropy on scales of one degree and smaller, the evidence that the Universe is at most very slightly curved is quite firm [5]. The curvature radius of the Universe (≡ Rcurv) and the total energy density parameter Ω0 = ρTOT/ρcrit, are related: Rcurv = H −1 0 /Ω0 − 11/2 The spatial flatness is expressed as Ω0 = 1.0 ± 0.04, or said in words, the curvature radius is at least 50 times greater than the Hubble radius. I will discuss the evidence for accelerated expansion and dark energy later. The series of acoustic peaks in the CMB multipole power spectrum and their heights indicate a nearly scale-invariant spectrum of adiabatic density perturbations with n = 1± 0.07. Nearly scale-invariant density perturbations and a flat Universe are two of the three 3 hallmarks of inflation. Thus, we are beginning to see the first significant experimental evidence for inflation, the driving idea in cosmology for the past two decades. The striking agreement of the BBN determination of the baryon density from measure- ments of the primeval deuterium abundance [6, 7], ΩBh2 = 0.020 ± 0.001, with those from from recent CMB anisotropy measurements [5], ΩBh2 = 0.022 ± 0.004, make a strong case for a small baryon density, as well as the consistency of the standard cosmology (h = H0/100 km sec−1 Mpc−1). There can now be little doubt that baryons account for but a few percent of the critical density. Our knowledge of the total matter density is improving, and becoming less linked to the distribution of light. This makes determinations of the matter less sensitive to the uncertain relationship between the clustering of mass and of light (what astronomers call the bias factor b) [10]. Both the CMB and clusters of galaxies allow a determination of the ratio of the total matter density (anything that clusters -- baryons, neutrinos, cold dark matter) to that in baryons alone: ΩM /ΩB = 7.2 ± 2.1 (CMB) [8], 9 ± 1.5 (clusters) [9]. Not only are these numbers consistent, they make a very strong case for something beyond quark-based matter. When combined with our knowledge of the baryon density, one infers a total matter density of ΩM = 0.33 ± 0.04 [10]. The many successes of the cold dark matter (CDM) scenario -- from the sequence of structure formation (galaxies first, clusters of galaxies and larger objects later) and the structure of the intergalactic medium, to its ability to reproduce the power spectrum of inhomogeneity measured today -- makes it clear that CDM holds much, if not all, of the truth in describing the formation of structure in the Universe. The two largest redshift surveys, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the 2-degree Field project (2dF), have each recently measured the power spectrum using samples of more than 100,000 galaxies and found that it is consistent with that predicted in a flat accelerating Universe comprised of cold dark matter [11]. The SDSS will eventually use a sample of almost one million galaxies to probe the power spectrum. [Interestingly enough, according to the 2dF Collaboration, bias appears to be a small effect, b = 1.0 ± 0.09 [12].] All of this implies that whatever the dark matter particle is, it moves slowly (i.e., the bulk of the matter cannot be in the form of hot dark matter such as neutrinos) and interacts only weakly (e.g., with strength much less than electromagnetic) with ordinary matter. The evidence from SuperKamiokande [13] for neutrino oscillations makes a strong case that neutrinos have mass (Pi mν >∼ 0.1 eV) and therefore contribute to the mass budget of the Universe at a level comparable to, or greater than, that of bright stars. Particle dark matter has moved from the realm of a hypothesis to a quantitative question -- how much of each type of particle dark matter is there in the Universe? Structure formation in the Universe (especially the existence of small scale structure) suggests that neutrinos contribute at most 5% or 10% of the critical density, corresponding to Pi mnu = Pi mν/90h2 eV <∼ 5 eV [14]. Even the age of the Universe and the pesky Hubble constant have been reined in. The 4 uncertainties in the ages of the oldest globular clusters have been better identified and quantified, leading to a more precise age, t0 = 13.5 ± 1.5 Gyr [15]. The CMB can be used to constrain the expansion age, independent of direct measurements of H0 or the composition of the Universe, texp = 14 ± 0.5 Gyr [16]. A host of different techniques are consistent with the Hubble constant determined by the HST key project, H0 = 72 ± 7 km s−1 Mpc−1. Further, the error budget is now well understood and well quantified [17]. [The bulk of the ±7 uncertainty is systematic, dominated by the uncertainty in the distance to the LMC and the Cepheid period -- luminosity relation.] Moreover, the expansion age derived from this consensus Hubble constant, which depends upon the composition of the Universe, is consistent with the previous two age determinations. The poster child for precision cosmology continues to be the present temperature of the CMB. It was determined by the FIRAS instrument on COBE to be: T0 = 2.725 ± 0.001 K [18]. Further, any deviations from a black body spectrum are smaller than 50 parts per million. Such a perfect Planckian spectrum has made any noncosmological explanation untenable. 2.2 Successes and Consistency Tests To sum up, we have determined the basic features of the Universe: the cosmic mat- ter/energy budget; a self consistent set of cosmological parameters with realistic errors; and the global curvature. Two of the three key predictions of inflation -- flatness and nearly scale-invariant, adiabatic density perturbations -- have passed their first significant tests. Last but not least, the growing quantity of precision data are now testing the consistency of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker framework and General Relativity itself. In particular, the equality of the baryon densities determined from BBN and CMB anisotropy is remarkable. The first involves nuclear physics when the Universe was seconds old, while the latter involves gravitational and classical electrodynamics when the Universe was 400,000 years old. The entire framework has been tested by the existence of the aforementioned acoustic peaks in the CMB angular power spectrum. They reveal large-scale motions that have remained coherent over hundreds of thousands of years, through a delicate interplay of gravitational and electromagnetic interactions. Another test of the basic framework is the accounting of the density of matter and energy in the Universe. The CMB measurement of spatial flatness implies that the matter and energy densities must sum to the critical density. Measurements of the matter density indicate ΩM = 0.33 ± 0.04; and measurements of the acceleration of the Universe from supernovae indicate the existence of a smooth dark energy component that accounts for ΩX ∼ 0.67. [The amount of dark energy inferred from the supernova measurements depends its equation of state; for a cosmological constant, ΩΛ = 0.8 ± 0.16.] Finally, while cosmology has in the past been plagued by "age crises" -- time back to 5 the big bang (expansion age) apparently less than the ages of the oldest objects within the Universe -- today the ages determined by very different and completely independent techniques point to a consistent age of 14 Gyr. 3 Mysteries Cosmological observations over the next decade will test -- and probably refine -- the New Cosmology [19]. If we are fortunate, they will also help us to make better sense of it. At the moment, the New Cosmology has presented us with a number of cosmic mysteries -- opportunities for surprises and new insights. Here I will quickly go through my list, and save the most intriguing to me -- dark energy -- for its own section. 3.1 Dark Matter By now, the conservative hypothesis is that the dark matter consists of a new form of matter, with the axion and neutralino as the leading candidates. That most of the matter in the Universe exists in a new form of matter -- yet to be detected in the laboratory -- is a bold and untested assertion. Experiments to directly detect the neutralinos or axions holding our own galaxy to- gether have now reached sufficient sensitivity to probe the regions of parameter space preferred by theory. In addition, the neutralino can be created by upcoming collider experiments (at the Tevatron or the LHC), or detected by its annihilation signatures -- high-energy neutrinos from the sun, narrow positron lines in the cosmic rays, and gamma- ray line radiation [20]. While the CDM scenario is very successful there are some nagging problems. They may point to a fundamental difficulty or may be explained by messy astrophysics [21]. The most well known of these problems are the prediction of cuspy dark-matter halos (density profile ρDM → 1/rn as r → 0, with n ≃ 1 − 1.5) and the apparent prediction of too much substructure. While there are plausible astrophysical explanations for both problems [22], they could indicate an unexpected property of the dark-matter particle (e.g., large self-interaction cross section [23], large annihilation cross section [24], or mass of around 1 keV). While I believe it is unlikely, these problems could indicate a failure of the particle dark-matter paradigm and have their explanation in a radical modification of gravity theory [21]. I leave for the "astrophysics to do list" an accounting of the dark baryons. Since ΩB ≃ 0.04 and Ω∗ ≃ 0.005, the bulk of the baryons are optically dark. In clusters, the dark baryons have been identified: they exists as hot, x-ray emitting gas. Elsewhere, the dark baryons have not yet been identified. According to CDM, the bulk of the dark baryons are likely to exist as hot/warm gas associated with galaxies, but this gas has not been detected. [Since clusters account for only about 5 percent of the total mass, the bulk of the dark baryons are still not accounted for.] 6 3.2 Baryogenesis The origin of quark-based matter is not yet fully understood. We do know that the origin of ordinary matter requires a small excess of quarks over antiquarks (about a part in 109) at a time at least as early as 10−6 sec, to avoid the annihilation catastrophe associated with a baryon symmetric Universe [4]. If the Universe underwent inflation, the baryon asymmetry cannot be primeval, it must be produced dynamically ("baryogenesis") after inflation since any pre-inflation baryon asymmetry is diluted away by the enormous entropy production associated with reheating. Because we also now know that electroweak processes violate B +L at a very rapid rate at temperatures above 100 GeV or so, baryogenesis is more constrained than when the idea was introduced more than twenty years ago. Today there are three possibilities: 1) produce the baryon asymmetry by GUT-scale physics with B − L 6= 0 (to prevent it being subsequently washed away by B + L violation); 2) produce a lepton asymmetry (L 6= 0), which is then transmuted into the baryon asymmetry by electroweak B + L violation [25]; or 3) produce the baryon asymmetry during the electroweak phase transition using electroweak B violation [26]. While none of the three possibilities can be ruled out, the second possibility looks most promising, and it adds a new twist to the origin of quark-based matter: We are here because neutrinos have mass. [In the lepton asymmetry first scenario, Majorana neutrino mass provides the requisite lepton number violation.] The drawback of the first possibility is the necessity of a high reheat temperature after inflation, TRH ≫ 105 GeV, which is difficult to achieve in most models of inflation. The last possibility, while very attractive because all the input physics might be measurable at accelerator, requires new sources of CP violation at TeV energies as well as a strongly first-order electroweak phase transition (which is currently disfavored by the high mass of the Higgs) [26]. 3.3 Inflation There are still many questions to be answered about inflation, including the most funda- mental: did inflation (or something similar) actually take place! A powerful program is in place to test the inflationary framework. Testing framework involves testing its three robust predictions: spatially flat Universe; nearly-scale invariant, nearly power-law spectrum of Gaussian adiabatic, density perturbations; and a spectrum of nearly scale-invariant gravitational waves. The first two predictions are being probed today and will be probed much more sharply over the next decade. The value of Ω0 should be determined to much better than 1 percent. The spectral index n that characterizes the density perturbations should be measured to percent accuracy. Generically, inflation predicts n−1 ∼ O(0.1), where n = 1 corresponds to exact scale invariance. Likewise, the deviations from an exact power-law predicted by inflation [27], 7 dn/d ln k ∼ 10−4 − 10−2 will be tested. The CMB and the abundance of rare objects such as clusters of galaxies will allow Gaussianity to be tested. Inflationary theory has given little guidance as to the amplitude of the gravitational waves produced during inflation. If detected, they are a smokin' gun prediction. Their amplitude is directly related to the scale of inflation, hGW ≃ Hinflation/mPl. Together measurements of n − 1 and dn/ ln k, they can reveal much about the underlying scalar potential driving inflation. Measuring their spectral index -- a most difficult task -- provides a consistency test of the single scalar-field model of inflation [28]. 3.4 The Dimensionality of Space-time Are there additional spatial dimensions beyond the three for which we have very firm evi- dence? I cannot think of a deeper question in physics today. If there are new dimensions, they are likely to be relevant for cosmology, or at least raise new questions in cosmology (e.g., why are only three dimensions large? what is going on in the bulk? and so on). Further, cosmology may well be the best means for establishing the existence of extra dimensions. 3.5 Before Inflation, Other Big-bang Debris, and Surprises Only knowing everything there is to know about the Universe would be worse than know- ing all the questions to ask about it. Without doubt, as our understanding deepens, new questions and new surprises will spring forth. The cosmological attraction of inflation is its ability to make the present state of the Universe insensitive to its initial state. However, should we establish inflation as part of cosmic history, I am certain that cosmologists will begin asking what happened before inflation. Progress in cosmology depends upon studying relics. We have made much of the handful we have -- the light elements, the baryon asymmetry, dark matter, and the CMB. The significance of a new relic cannot be overstated. For example, detection of the cosmic sea of neutrinos would reveal the Universe at 1 second. Identifying the neutralino as the dark matter particle and determining its properties at an accelerator laboratory would open a window on the Universe at 10−8 sec. By comparing its relic abundance as derived from its mass and cross section with its actual abundance measured in the Universe, one could test cosmology at the time the neutralino abundance was determined. And then there may be the unexpected. Recently, a group reported evidence for a part in 105 difference in the fine-structure constant at redshifts of order a few from its value today [29]. I remain skeptical, given possible astrophysical explanations, other much tighter constraints to the variation of α (albeit at more recent times), and the absence of 8 a reasonable theoretical model. For reference, I was also skeptical about the atmospheric neutrino problem because of the need for large-mixing angles. 4 Dark Energy: Seven Things We Know The dark energy accounts for 2/3 of the stuff in the Universe and determines its destiny. That puts it high on the list of outstanding problems in cosmology. Its deep connections to fundamental physics -- a new form of energy with repulsive gravity and possible impli- cations for the divergences of quantum theory and supersymmetry breaking -- put it very high on the list of outstanding problems in particle physics [30, 31]. What then is dark energy? Dark energy is my term for the causative agent for the current epoch of accelerated expansion. According to the second Friedmann equation, R R = − 4πG 3 (ρ + 3p) (1) this stuff must have negative pressure, with magnitude comparable to its energy density, in order to produce accelerated expansion [recall q = −( R/R)/H 2; R is the cosmic scale factor]. Further, since this mysterious stuff does not show its presence in galaxies and clusters of galaxies, it must be relatively smoothly distributed. That being said, dark energy has the following defining properties: (1) it emits/absorbs no light; (2) it has large, negative pressure, pX ∼ −ρX ; (3) it is approximately homoge- neous (more precisely, does not cluster significantly with matter on scales at least as large as clusters of galaxies); and (4) it is very mysterious. Because its pressure is comparable in magnitude to its energy density, it is more "energy-like" than "matter-like" (matter being characterized by p ≪ ρ). Dark energy is qualitatively very different from dark matter, and is certainly not a replacement for it. 4.1 Two Lines of Evidence for an Accelerating Universe Two independent lines of reasoning point to an accelerating Universe. The first is the direct evidence based upon measurements of type Ia supernovae carried out by two groups, the Supernova Cosmology Project [32] and the High-z Supernova Team [33]. These two teams used different analysis techniques and different samples of high-z supernovae and came to the same conclusion: the expansion of the Universe is speeding up, not slowing down. The recent serendipitous discovery of a supernovae at z = 1.76 bolsters the case signif- icantly [34] and provides the first evidence for an early epoch of decelerated expansion[35]. SN 1997ff falls right on the accelerating Universe curve on the magnitude -- redshift di- agram, and is a magnitude brighter than expected in a dusty open Universe or an open Universe in which type Ia supernovae are systematically fainter at high-z. 9 The second, independent line of reasoning for accelerated expansion comes from mea- surements of the composition of the Universe, which point to a missing energy component with negative pressure. The argument goes like this: CMB anisotropy measurements in- dicate that the Universe is nearly flat, with density parameter, Ω0 = 1.0 ± 0.04. In a flat Universe, the matter density and energy density must sum to the critical density. How- ever, matter only contributes about 1/3 of the critical density, ΩM = 0.33 ± 0.04. (This is based upon measurements of CMB anisotropy, of bulk flows, and of the baryonic fraction in clusters.) Thus, two thirds of the critical density is missing! Doing the bookkeeping more precisely, ΩX = 0.67 ± 0.06 [10]. In order to have escaped detection, this missing energy must be smoothly distributed. In order not to interfere with the formation of structure (by inhibiting the growth of density perturbations), the energy density in this component must change more slowly than matter (so that it was subdominant in the past). For example, if the missing 2/3 of critical density were smoothly distributed matter (p = 0), then linear density perturba- tions would grow as R1/2 rather than as R. The shortfall in growth since last scattering (z ≃ 1100) would be a factor of 30, far too little growth to produce the structure seen today. The pressure associated with the missing energy component determines how it evolves: ρX ∝ R−3(1+w) ⇒ ρX/ρM ∝ (1 + z)3w (2) where w is the ratio of the pressure of the missing energy component to its energy density (here assumed to be constant). Note, the more negative w, the faster the ratio of missing energy to matter decreases to zero in the past. In order to grow the structure observed today from the density perturbations indicated by CMB anisotropy measurements, w must be more negative than about − 1 2 [36]. For a flat Universe the deceleration parameter today is q0 = 1 2 + 3 2 wΩX ∼ 1 2 + w Therefore, knowing w < − 1 2 implies q0 < 0 and accelerated expansion. This independent argument for accelerated expansion and dark energy makes the supernova case all the more compelling. 4.2 Gravity Can Be Repulsive in Einstein's Theory, But ... In Newton's theory, mass is the source of the gravitational field and gravity is always attractive. In General Relativity, both energy and pressure source the gravitational field: R/R ∝ −(ρ+3p), cf., Eq. 1. Sufficiently large negative pressure leads to repulsive gravity. While accelerated expansion can be accommodated within Einstein's theory, that does not preclude that the ultimate explanation lies in a fundamental modification of Einstein's 10 theory. Lacking any good ideas for such a modification, I will discuss how accelerated expansion fits in the context of General Relativity. If the explanation for the accelerating Universe ultimately fits within the Einsteinian framework, it will be a stunning new triumph for General Relativity. 4.3 The Biggest Embarrassment in all of Theoretical Physics Einstein introduced the cosmological constant to balance the attractive gravity of matter. He quickly discarded the cosmological constant after the discovery of the expansion of the Universe. The advent of quantum field theory made consideration of the cosmological constant obligatory, not optional: The only possible covariant form for the energy of the (quantum) vacuum, T µν VAC = ρVACgµν, is mathematically equivalent to the cosmological constant. It takes the form for a perfect fluid with energy density ρVAC and isotropic pressure pVAC = −ρVAC (i.e., w = −1) and is precisely spatially uniform. Vacuum energy is almost the perfect candidate for dark energy. Here is the rub: the quantum zero-point contributions arising from well-understood physics (the known particles, integrating up to 100 GeV) sum to 1055 times the present critical density. (Put another way, if this were so, the Hubble time would be 10−10 sec, and the associated event horizon would be 3 cm!) This is the well known cosmological-constant problem [30, 31]. While string theory currently offers the best hope for marrying gravity to quantum mechanics, it has shed precious little light on the cosmological constant problem, other than to speak to its importance. Thomas has suggested that using the holographic princi- ple to count the available number of states in our Hubble volume leads to an upper bound on the vacuum energy that is comparable to the energy density in matter + radiation [37]. While this reduces the magnitude of the cosmological-constant problem very significantly, it does not solve the dark energy problem: a vacuum energy that is always comparable to the matter + radiation energy density would strongly suppress the growth of structure. The deSitter space associated with the accelerating Universe may pose serious prob- lems for the formulation of string theory [38]. Banks and Dine argue that all explanations for dark energy suggested thus far are incompatible with perturbative string theory [39]. At the very least there is high tension between accelerated expansion and string theory. The cosmological constant problem leads to a fork in the dark-energy road: one path is to wait for theorists to get the "right answer" (i.e., ΩX = 2/3); the other path is to assume that even quantum nothingness weighs nothing and something else with negative pressure must be causing the Universe to speed up. Of course, theorists follow the advice of Yogi Berra: "When you see a fork in the road, take it." 11 4.4 Parameterizing Dark Energy: For Now, It's w Theorists have been very busy suggesting all kinds of interesting possibilities for the dark energy: networks of topological defects, rolling or spinning scalar fields (quintessence and spintessence), influence of "the bulk", and the breakdown of the Friedmann equations [31, 41]. An intriguing recent paper suggests dark matter and dark energy are connected through axion physics [40]. In the absence of compelling theoretical guidance, there is a simple way to parameterize dark energy, by its equation-of-state w [36]. The uniformity of the CMB testifies to the near isotropy and homogeneity of the Universe. This implies that the stress-energy tensor for the Universe must take the perfect fluid form [4]. Since dark energy dominates the energy budget, its stress-energy tensor must, to a good approximation, take the form TX µ ν ≈ diag[ρX , −pX, −pX , −pX] (3) where pX is the isotropic pressure and the desired dark energy density is ρX = 2.7 × 10−47 GeV4 (for h = 0.72 and ΩX = 0.66). This corresponds to a tiny energy scale, ρ1/4 10−3 eV. X = 2.3 × The pressure can be characterized by its ratio to the energy density (or equation-of- state): w ≡ pX /ρX Note, w need not be constant; e.g., it could be a function of ρX or an explicit function of time or redshift. (w can always be rewritten as an implicit function of redshift.) For vacuum energy w = −1; for a network of topological defects w = −N/3 where N is the dimensionality of the defects (1 for strings, 2 for walls, etc.). For a minimally coupled, rolling scalar field, w = 1 2 1 2 φ2 − V (φ) φ2 + V (φ) (4) which is time dependent and can vary between −1 (when potential energy dominates) and +1 (when kinetic energy dominates). Here V (φ) is the potential for the scalar field. 4.5 The Universe: The Lab for Studying Dark Energy Dark energy by its very nature is diffuse and a low-energy phenomenon. It probably cannot be produced at accelerators; it isn't found in galaxies or even clusters of galaxies. The Universe itself is the natural lab -- perhaps the only lab -- in which to study it. 12 The primary effect of dark energy on the Universe is determining the expansion rate. In turn, the expansion rate affects the distance to an object at a given redshift z [≡ r(z)] and the growth of linear density perturbations. The governing equations are: H 2(z) = H 2 r(z) = Z z 0 0 (1 + z)3 hΩM + ΩX (1 + z)3wi du/H(u) 0 = δk + 2H δk − 4πGρM δk (5) where for simplicity w is assumed to be constant and δk is the Fourier component of comoving wavenumber k and overdot indicates d/dt. The various cosmological approaches to ferreting out the nature of the dark energy -- all of which depend upon how the dark energy affects the expansion rate -- have been studied [43]. Based largely upon my work with Dragan Huterer [44], I summarize what we now know about the efficacy of the cosmological probes of dark energy: • Present cosmological observations prefer w = −1, with a 95% confidence limit w < −0.6 [46]. • Because dark energy was less important in the past, ρX /ρM ∝ (1 + z)3w → 0 as z → ∞, and the Hubble flow at low redshift is insensitive to the composition of the Universe, the most sensitive redshift interval for probing dark energy is z = 0.2 − 2 [44]. • The CMB has limited power to probe w (e.g., the projected precision for Planck is σw = 0.25) and no power to probe its time variation [44]. • A high-quality sample of 2000 SNe distributed from z = 0.2 to z = 1.7 could measure w to a precision σw = 0.05 (assuming an irreducible systematic error of 0.14 mag). If ΩM is known independently to better than σΩM = 0.03, σw improves by a factor of three and the rate of change of w′ = dw/dz can be measured to precision σw′ = 0.16 [44]. • Counts of galaxies and of clusters of galaxies may have the same potential to probe w as SNe Ia. The critical issue is systematics (including the evolution of the intrinsic comoving number density, and the ability to identify galaxies or clusters of a fixed mass) [42]. • Measuring weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure over a field of 1000 square degrees (or more) could have comparable sensitivity to w as type Ia super- novae. However, weak gravitational lensing does not appear to be a good method to probe the time variation of w [45]. The systematics associated with weak gravi- tational lensing have not yet been studied carefully and could limit its potential. 13 With the exception of vacuum energy, all the other possibilities for the dark energy cluster to some small extent on the largest scales [47]. Measuring this clustering, while extremely challenging, could rule out vacuum or help to elucidate the nature of the dark energy. Hu and Okamoto have recently suggested how the CMB might be used to get at this clustering [48]. While the Universe is likely the lab where dark energy can best be attacked, one should not rule other approaches. For example, if the dark energy involves a ultra-light scalar field, then there should be a new long-range force [49]. 4.6 The Nancy Kerrigan Problem A critical constraint on dark energy is that it not interfere with the formation of structure in the Universe. This means that dark energy must have been relatively unimportant in the past (at least back to the time of last scattering, z ∼ 1100). If dark energy is characterized by constant w, not interfering with structure formation can be quantified as: w <∼ − 1 2 [36]. This means that the dark-energy density evolves more slowly than R−3/2 (compared to R−3 for matter) and implies ρX /ρM → 0 for t → 0 ρX /ρM → ∞ for t → ∞ That is, in the past dark energy was unimportant and in the future it will be dominant! We just happen to live at the time when dark matter and dark energy have comparable densities. In the words of Olympic skater Nancy Kerrigan, "Why me? Why now?" Perhaps this fact is an important clue to unraveling the nature of the dark energy. Perhaps not. I shudder to say this, but it could be at the root of an anthropic explanation for the size of the cosmological constant: The cosmological constant is as large as it can be and still allow the formation of structures that can support life [51]. 4.7 Dark Energy and Destiny Almost everyone is aware of the connection between the shape of the Universe and its destiny: positively curved recollapses, flat; negatively curved expand forever. The link between geometry and destiny depends upon a critical assumption: that matter dominates the energy budget (more precisely, that all components of matter/energy have equation of state w > − 1 3). Dark energy does not satisfy this condition. In a Universe with dark energy the connection between geometry and destiny is severed [50]. A flat Universe (like ours) can continue expanding exponentially forever with the number of visible galaxies diminishing to a few hundred (e.g., if the dark energy is a true cosmological constant); the expansion can slow to that of a matter-dominated model (e.g., 14 if the dark energy dissipates and becomes sub-dominant); or, it is even possible for the Universe to recollapse (e.g., if the dark energy decays revealing a negative cosmological constant). Because string theory prefers anti-deSitter space, the third possibility should not be forgotten. Dark energy is the key to understanding our destiny. 5 A Cosmic Perspective from Rovaniemi After attending an exciting, enjoyable, and very productive COSMO-01, here is my sum- mary of the state of cosmology: • We have discerned the basic features of the Universe, as embodied in The New Cosmology. • We can say confidently that events that took place during earliest moments have had a profound influence on the present state of Universe. • We have a impressive program in place to test inflation and the particle dark-matter hypothesis, as well as their corollary, the Cold Dark Matter theory of structure formation. • For some years, the front line in cosmology will continue to be phenomenology. • No doubt, there will be surprises and we will need new ideas to replace (or supple- ment) those that are driving cosmology today. • Schramm's Razor -- given two equally interesting new ideas, pursue the one that's more testable -- is more true than ever. I am look forward to new results, new ideas and new (as well as old) faces at COSMO- 02 in Chicago. References [1] See e.g., M.L. Humason, N.U. Mayall, and A.R. Sandage, Astrophys. J. 61, 97 (1956). [2] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley & Sons, NY, 1972). [3] M.S. Turner, "Grand Unification and the Fundamental Problems of Classical Cos- mology," in Second Workshop on Grand Unification, eds. J.P. Leveille, L.R. Sulak, and D.G. Unger (Birkhauser, Boston, 1981) 15 [4] See e.g., P.J.E. Peebles, Physical Cosmology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971); or E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990). [5] P. de Bernardis et al, Nature 404, 955 (2000); S. Hanany et al, Astrophys. J. 545, L5 (2000); C.B. Netterfield et al, astro-ph/0104460; C. Pryke et al, astro-ph/0104490 [6] D. Tytler et al, Physica Scripta T85, 12 (2000); J.M. O'Meara et al, Astrophys. J. 552, 718 (2001) [7] S. Burles et al, Phys. Rev. D 63, 063512 (2001); Astrophys. J. 552, L1 (2001) [8] C.B. Netterfield et al, astro-ph/0104460; C. Pryke et al, astro-ph/0104490 [9] See e.g., J. Mohr et al, Astrophys. J. 517, 627 (1998) [10] M.S. Turner, astro-ph/0106035 [11] W.J. Percival et al (2dF), astro-ph/0105252; S. Dodelson et al (SDSS), astro- ph/0107421 [12] O. Lahav et al (2dF), astro-ph/0112162 [13] Y. Fukuda et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998) [14] R. Croft, W. Hu and R. Dave, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1092 (1999) [15] L. Krauss and B. Chaboyer, astro-ph/0111597; I. Ferreres, A. Melchiorri, and J. Silk, MNRAS 327, L47 (2001) [16] L. Knox, N. Christensen, and C. Skordis, astro-ph/0109232 [17] W.L. Freedman et al, Astrophys. J. 553, 47 (2001) [18] J. Mather et al, Astrophys. J. 512, 511 (1999) [19] M.S. Turner, PASP 113, 653 (2001) (astro-ph/0102057) [20] See e.g., B. Sadoulet, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S197 (1999) or K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rep. 333-4, 167 (2000) [21] See e.g., J. Sellwood and A. Kosowsky, astro-ph/0009074 [22] See e.g., J. Bullock, A. Kravtsov and D. Weinberg, Astrophys. J. 539, 517 (2000); R.S. Somerville, astro-ph/0107507; A.J. Benson et al, astro-ph/0108218; M.D. Wein- berg and N. Katz, astro-ph/0110632; A. Klypin, H.-S. Zhao, and R.S. Somerville, astro-ph/0110390; D. Merritt and F. Cruz, Astrophys. J. 551, L41 (2001); M. Milosavljevic and D. Merritt, Astrophys. J. 563, 34 (2001); M. Milosavljevic et al, astro-ph/0110185 16 [23] D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760 (2000) [24] M. Kaplinghat, L. Knox and M.S. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 3335 (2000) [25] W. Buchmuller, hep-ph/0107153 [26] J.M. Cline et al, JHEP 0007 (2000) 018; A. Cohen, D. Kaplan, and A. Nelson, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 27 (1994) [27] A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 52, R1739 (1995) [28] M.S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 48, 5539 (1993); J.E. Lidsey et al, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 373 (1997) [29] J.K. Webb et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 091301 (2001) [30] S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989) [31] http://www.livingreviews.org/Articles/ Volume4/2001-1carroll [32] S. Perlmutter et al, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999) [33] A. Riess et al, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998) [34] A. Riess et al, Astrophys. J. 560, 49 (2001) [35] M.S. Turner and A. Riess, astro-ph/0106051 (Astrophys. J., in press) [36] M.S. Turner and M. White, Phys. Rev. 56, R4439 (1997) [37] S. Thomas, hep-th/0010145 [38] E. Witten, hep-th/0106109 [39] T. Banks and M. Dine, hep-th/0106276 [40] S. Barr and D. Seckel, astro-ph/0106239 [41] M.S. Turner, Physica Scripta T85, 210 (2000) [42] See e.g., J. Newman and M. Davis, Astrophys. J. 534, L11 (2000); G.P. Holder et al, Astrophys. J. 553, 545 (2001); S. Podariu and B. Ratra, astro-ph/0106549 [43] http://supernova.lbl.gov/∼evlinder/ sci.html [44] D. Huterer and M.S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 64, 123527 (2001) [45] D. Huterer, astro-ph/0106399 (submitted to Phys. Rev. D) 17 [46] S. Perlmutter, M.S. Turner, and M. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 670 (1999) [47] K. Coble, S. Dodelson, and J. Frieman, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1851 (1997) [48] W. Hu and T. Okamoto, astro-ph/0111606 [49] S. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3067 (1998) [50] L. Krauss and M.S. Turner, Gen. Rel Grav. 31, 1453 (1999) [51] H. Martel, P. Shapiro, and S. Weinberg, Astrophys. J. 492, 29 (1998) 18
0802.2118	2	0802	2008-03-06T01:27:51	A Long Look at the Be/X-Ray Binaries of the Small Magellanic Cloud	[ "astro-ph" ]	We have monitored 41 Be/X-ray binary systems in the Small Magellanic Cloud over ~9 years using PCA-RXTE data from a weekly survey program. The resulting light curves were analysed in search of orbital modulations with the result that 10 known orbital ephemerides were confirmed and refined, while 10 new ones where determined. A large number of X-ray orbital profiles are presented for the first time, showing similar characteristics over a wide range of orbital periods. Lastly, three pulsars: SXP46.4, SXP89.0 and SXP165 were found to be misidentifications of SXP46.6, SXP91.1 and SXP169, respectively.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A Long Look at the Be/X-Ray Binaries of the Small Magellanic Cloud J.L. Galache Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 R.H.D. Corbet1 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 M.J. Coe School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 S. Laycock School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK M.P.E. Schurch C. Markwardt2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 F.E. Marshall NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 and J. Lochner3 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 ABSTRACT 1University of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD 21250 2Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 3Universities Space Research Association -- 2 -- We have monitored 41 Be/X-ray binary systems in the Small Magellanic Cloud over ∼ 9 years using PCA-RXTE data from a weekly survey program. The resulting light curves were analysed in search of orbital modulations with the result that 10 known orbital ephemerides were confirmed and refined, while 10 new ones where determined. A large number of X-ray orbital profiles are presented for the first time, showing similar characteristics over a wide range of orbital periods. Lastly, three pulsars: SXP46.4, SXP89.0 and SXP165 were found to be misidentifications of SXP46.6, SXP91.1 and SXP169, respectively. Subject headings: galaxies: individual (Small Magellanic Cloud) -- pulsars: gen- eral -- X-rays: binaries 1. Introduction The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) has become a fertile orchard of High-Mass X- ray Binaries (HMXBs), with 49 confirmed systems (Coe et al. 2005; McGowan et al. 2007). Given that, from extrapolation of the Milky Way's population (and even correcting for the higher Be/B ratio in the SMC (Maeder et al. 1999)), one would expect to find only 3 -- 4 systems, it is clear that the SMC is a special place where recent star formation has provided an abundance of HMXBs; indeed, the SFR/M (Star Formation Rate/Mass) of the SMC is 150 times that of the Milky Way (Grimm et al. 2003). Of particular significance is the fact that only one of these binary systems is not a Be/X-ray binary (SMC X-1 is the sole supergiant system discovered so far). This large number of Be/X-ray binary systems, conveniently located within the 3◦× 3◦area of the SMC, provides an unrivaled opportunity to study this population as a whole, as well as individually. With a 2◦ FWZI field of view, high timing resolution (1 µs), and sensitive enough to detect the 1036 -- 1038 erg s−1 luminosities typical of these systems when in outburst, the PCA instrument (Jahoda et al. 1996, 2005) on board RXTE is well suited for a long-term monitoring survey of the SMC. The different types of X-ray activity displayed by Be/X-ray transient systems were classified by Stella et al. (1986) into the following categories: -- Persistent low-luminosity X-ray emission (Lx . 1036 erg s−1) or none detectable (in which case the system is said to be in quiescence). -- Type I outbursts: Outbursts of moderate intensity (Lx ≃ 1036 -- 1037 erg s−1) and short duration (a few days) generally recurring with the orbital period of the system and taking place at, or close to the time of periastron passage. -- 3 -- -- Type II outbursts: Giant X-ray outbursts (Lx & 1037 erg s−1) lasting for weeks or months that generally show no correlation with orbital phase. The data presented in this paper spans November 1997 -- November 2006, and builds upon the work of Laycock et al. (2005), who analysed the first 4 years of data. Following is a brief description of the survey so far, which is still ongoing as of June 2007. 1.1. The survey The initial observations of the SMC with RXTE began in 1997. The first observation took place in November of that year when an outburst detected by the ASM was missiden- tified as SMC X-3. It was RXTE's second year of operation, and only SMC X-1, 2 and 3, SXP2.76 and SXP8.88 were known. From these initial observations it soon became apparent that there were more than 5 X-ray pulsars in the SMC. The observations carried out within the next year brought about the discovery of 5 new systems: SXPs 46.6, 59.0, 74.7, 91.1 and 169. Other pulsars were also discovered or detected with EINSTEIN, ASCA, BeppoSAX and ROSAT. 1999 marked the beginning of a coordinated survey of the SMC using the PCA. The PCA's 2◦ field of view provides coverage of a wide area of the SMC, which allows many pulsars to be monitored with just one pointing. A number of different pointing positions have been used throughout the years and are given in Table 1 (see also Fig. 1); some of the less observed ones never received a name and are omitted from the table. The most frequently observed is Position 1 (later renamed to A), which has been the main pointing position since AO4, except during AO6 and AO7, when Position 5 was the main target. In total, the collected data spans ∼ 9 years. The survey has gone through various phases characterised by different observing posi- tions and/or observing modalities. Phases 1 -- 4 have already been described in Laycock et al. (2005) but they are outlined here again, together with the two latest phases not included in previous studies. Phase 1 (AO2 -- AO3): These observations used Positions 1a, 1b and 1c and are described in Lochner et al. (1999a,b). Only 30 observations were carried out, their main purpose being to monitor the 5 newly discovered pulsars in those regions. Phase 2 (AO4): Positions 1 -- 4 were defined; Position 1 overlaps most of Positions 1a -- c and contained the new pulsars, Positions 2 and 4 cover the rest of the bar of the SMC -- 4 -- while Position 3 covers the area of the wing containing SMC X-1. A continued survey began at this point in time, with ∼ 3 ks observations being made once a week, mostly of Position 1, with some occasional looks at the other positions. Phase 3 (AO5 -- AO6): Only Position 5 was monitored, and was done weekly so as not to create gaps in the data; the majority of the most active systems located in Position 1 also fell within the field of view of Position 5. Time allotted for the project was increased to an average of ∼ 5 ks per observation, thus providing better sensitivity to longer period pulsations. Phase 4 (AO7 -- AO9): Weekly monitoring returned to Position 1, now renamed Position A, with additional observations of the other positions (B, C and D, which are very close to 2, 3 and 4, respectively) being made once a month. These monthly pointings were ∼ 15 ks, while the weekly ones were increased to ∼ 6 -- 7 ks. Phase 5 (AO10): The time available for the monthly observations of alternate positions was invested into increasing the length of the weekly observations of Position A to ∼ 10 ks, this being the only monitored position. Phase 6 (AO11): Having mainly monitored the central bar of the SMC, it was decided to move to another location at the northeastern tip of the bar, near position B. This new location, Position X, was monitored for ∼ 10 ks weekly for 18 weeks, but was abandoned due to lack of pulsar activity. Observations then changed to Position D. 1.2. Data reduction Cleaning of the raw light curves was achieved via a pipeline employing various FTOOLS1 routines (Blackburn 1995). Initial filtering required the data to come from observations offset from the target no more than 0.004◦, with an elevation above the Earth's horizon of more than 5◦, and not taken during times of high background. Good Xenon mode data from the top anode layer only were used, within an energy range of 3 -- 10 keV. Data were binned at 0.01 s intervals, while background files were generated in 16 s bins. For each time-step, the net flux was divided by the number of active PCUs to give the counts PCU−1 s−1. Then, the light curves time tags were corrected to the Solar System barycenter, removing timing variations caused by the satellite's motion around the Earth and Sun. Finally, short light 1http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ftools/ -- 5 -- Fig. 1. -- Map of the SMC H I distribution with the 5 main pointing positions of RXTE during the survey shown as numbered white circles. For each pointing, the inner circle has a diameter of 1◦, the outer of 2◦. For clarity, Positions A, B, C, D and X have not been plotted, as they are very close to Positions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 2, respectively. Pulsars with known positions are marked by small circles. H I data from Stanimirovic et al. (1999). -- 6 -- curves belonging to the same observation (which had been split up due to SAA passage, Earth occultation or flares) were pieced together into a long light curve spanning the whole observation. 1.3. Collimator correction The collimator of each PCU consists of a number of hexagonal cells joined in a hon- eycomb structure. The hexagonal tubes are not perfectly parallel with the result that all the PCUs are slightly off center. Hence, the resulting collimator response pattern has an elliptical hexagon shape with the maximum throughput being slightly off center. In order to account for differences in observed flux from a pulsar when observed at different pointing positions, a collimator correction was applied a posteriori to each pulsar's count rate. A look-up table approach was used, where each pulsar had a collimator response calculated for each of the pointing positions used in the survey (see Table 1). A pulsars with unknown position cannot be collimator corrected, so significant detec- tions may not rise above the noise level in the long-term light curve unless the outbursts are very bright and/or the pulsar is located close to the center of the field of view. Type I out- bursts may only appear bright when the pulsar is close to the center of the field of view (as with SXP59.0 in Position 1/A, Fig. 17), in which case the collimator correction is small any- way. To overcome this limitation pulsars with unknown positions had coordinates "guessed" for them on the basis of which observing positions they had been detected in throughout the mission; the coordinates assigned were approximately at the center of the region formed by the overlap of the observing positions in which it had been previously detected. 1.4. Data analysis Once the cleaned light curve for an observation was obtained, it was run through a timing analysis package using the Lomb-Scargle method (Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982) and numerically implemented following the prescription by Press & Rybicki (1989). Two different power spectra were generated for each light curve, each spanning different period spaces (from Pmin to Pmax), at different timing resolutions (∆f ), and pulsars were later searched for in their corresponding group according to their pulse period. The parameters used for each group are listed in Table 2. The reason for creating two groups was to obtain densely sampled periodograms at long periods without creating excessively large files. The parameters were chosen such that both groups would contain approximately the same number of independent -- 7 -- frequencies, M. Once the periodograms were calculated, it was necessary to establish an objective way to determine which peaks in the power spectra were real; this is covered in Appendix A. 1.4.1. Pulsar Detection Pulsars were searched for within the data using an algorithm specifically created for the task. Each light curve's two power spectra were scanned to look for the pulsars in groups 1 and 2; the steps used were as follows: Step 1: The highest peak (at a period P ) above 90% global significance in the power spec- trum is found and, either identified as a known pulsar, or flagged as an "unknown". Step 2: The light curve is folded at period P to produce a pulse profile. Step 3: Using the pulse profile as a template, the pulsations are then subtracted from the light curve and a power spectrum of the cleaned light curve is produced. Step 4: This power spectrum is subtracted from the previous one to create a pulsar-specific power spectrum (or P2S2), which shows only the contribution of the individual pulsar to the power spectrum. This method allows one to see the possible harmonics that may have been lost in the noise or confused with the fundamental of another pulsar. The power of the fundamental and harmonic(s) peaks in the P2S2 is measured and a pulse amplitude estimated using Eq. (A5). The significance of the detection is taken to be the local significance of a peak of power equal to that which the detected signal would have if the power in the harmonics were concentrated in the fundamental. Step 5: Repeat previous steps until all signals with peaks above 90% significance have been removed. Step 6: To account for the remaining, dim pulsars, a stretch of the power spectrum centered on each pulsar's nominal frequency, and with a total width which is different for each pulsar (and depends on the pulsar's past period history), is searched for a peak. If no peak is found, then the significance of the detection is set to 0% and the amplitude to that of the average power within the region. If there is a peak, then the significance of the detection is set to the local significance and the amplitude of the pulsar calculated from the power in the peak according to Eq. (A4). No harmonics are searched for in this case. -- 8 -- Table 1. RXTE's SMC survey pointing positions Name RA (◦) Dec (◦) 1a 1b 1c (SMC X-3) 1/A 2 3 4 5 B C D X SMC X-2 00 52 07.8 −72 25 43.3 00 51 04.0 −72 13 44.0 00 54 54.8 −72 26 40.9 00 53 53.0 −72 26 42.0 01 05 00.0 −72 06 00.0 01 15 00.0 −73 06 00.0 00 50 44.6 −73 16 04.8 00 50 00.0 −73 06 00.0 01 05 00.0 −72 06 21.6 01 15 00.0 −73 24 59.8 00 50 00.0 −73 06 00.0 01 05 00.0 −72 06 00.0 00 54 33.3 −73 41 04.2 Table 2. Parameters used for the Lomb-Scargle periodogram Group 1 Group 2 Pmin (s) Pmax (s) ∆f (Hz) Search range (s) 0.5 1000 10−5 0.5 -- 40 10 3000 5 × 10−7 40 -- 3000 -- 9 -- 1.4.2. Light Curve Generation and Porb Calculations Once the amplitude of the pulsed flux for every pulsar in every observation had been measured, a long-term light curve was created for each system showing its X-ray activity over the course of the survey. It is important to note that these light curves do not show the absolute flux, but rather the pulsed flux. Without knowing the pulsar's pulse fraction for each observation it is impossible to convert the pulsed flux amplitude into an absolute flux value. These light curves were then searched for periodicities, as the X-ray emission could show orbital modulations. Again, the Lomb-Scargle technique was employed, searching for periods in the appropriate range for each pulsar. In cases where Type II outbursts contaminated the Lomb-Scargle periodogram, these were removed from the data. In general, all bright outbursts were initially removed and only added back into the light curve if they coincided with the calculated ephemerides and their inclusion increased the significance of the calculated orbitla period. It is important to note that the collimator response correction was only applied to the data points whose local significance upon detection was ≥ 99%, anything below this detection threshold was considered noise, and as such was not collimator corrected. § 2 shows the results of these analyses. 1.4.3. Orbital Profile Generation Based on the ideas of de Jager et al. (1988) and Carstairs (1992), we used the Phase- Independent Folding (PIF) technique to create the orbital profiles. The method is as follows: the folded light curve is obtained from m sets of n-binned folded light curves. To begin with, the light curve is folded at the desired period and the time values converted to phase space (ranging from 0 to 1). This "raw" folded light curve is then binned into n bins (of width 1/n) in the standard way, with each bin starting at phase a/n (with a = 0, 1, 2, ...n − 1). This step is repeated again, but this time the bins start at phase a/n + 1/(n × m). In this way we create m folded light curves from the same data, each consisting of n bins, and only differing in the starting phase of these bins2. The general expression for the phase at which each bin begins is a/n + m/(n × m). Now each folded light curve is further divided into l = n × m sub-bins, such that in each light curve there will be n groups of m consecutive bins with the same flux value. The final folded light curve will have l bins, each of which is the average of the bins from the m sets of light curves. The error in each bin will be given by the standard error calculated from the m values that were averaged for each l-bin. In the present work we have used n × m = 10 × 5. 2We define φ = 0 at the time of the first data point in each observation. -- 10 -- The PIF method provides an efficient way of generating folded light curves from poorly sampled data as their shape will not depend on the starting point at which they are folded and, although only every m th bin will be independent, spurious flux values within bins will be evened out while real features will remain. Thus, we obtain the benefits of both wide bins (sufficient counts in each bin for good statistics) and narrow bins (sensitivity to narrow features in the profile). 2. Results Following are the results obtained from the light curves of the observed SMC X-ray pulsars. In the triple-panel plots (generally the (a) plots), the top panel shows the X- ray activity of each pulsar through the amplitude of the pulsed flux, with each solid line representing one observation. When an orbital period has been found, the ephemerides for the dates of maximum flux are over plotted as dashed vertical lines; where the orbital period is less than 25 days, only every other line is plotted for clarity. The middle panel shows the period at which the pulsar was detected, with the horizontal dashed line denoting the center of the pulsar's search range (note that only significant detections have their periods plotted). Finally, the bottom panel displays the significance of the neutron star's pulsations for each observation, with the three horizontal dashed lines marking, from bottom to top, the levels of 99, 99.99 and 99.9999% local significance. We considered a pulsar had been detected when its local significance was ≥ 99%. In the (b) plots we show the Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the pulsed flux light curve (top) and the light curve folded at the orbital period (bottom). When horizontal dashed lines are plotted on the periodogram, these represent different levels of significance, which are (from bottom to top) 99, 99.9, 99.99, and 99.999%. The coordinates given for each system are the most accurate at time or writing. When a Be/X-ray system has a confirmed optical counterpart, the coordinates of the counterpart are used. When no optical counterpart is known, but the system has been detected by Chandra and/or XMM, then it is the X-ray coordinates that were given. For some of the pulsars without an exact position, the coordinates provided by scans with RXTE are given; these are the least precise and have errors of up to several arc minutes. 2.1. SXP0.92 PSR J0045−7319 RA 00 45 35, dec −73 19 02 -- 11 -- History: First discovered as a radio pulsar by Ables et al. (1987) with a period of 0.926499± 0.000003 s using the Parkes 64 m radio telescope. Kaspi et al. (1993) observed Doppler shifts in the pulse period which where consistent with a 51 d binary orbit with a companion star hav- ing mass > 4 M⊙. Optical observations of the field revealed a 16th magnitude, 11 M ⊙, B1 main-sequence star, which is likely the companion (Bell 1994). Survey Results: SXP0.92 received ∼ 2 years of uninterrupted coverage during AO5 and AO6 (see Fig. 2), during which time it was only once detected above 99% local significance (MJD 52334). The power spectrum does not show any significant periods. 2.2. SXP2.16 XTE SMC2165 RA 01 19 00, dec −73 12 27 History: Discovered during the course of this survey by Corbet et al. (2003a) at 2.1652± 0.0001 s. Survey Results: Due to its position near SMC X-1 it has only been within the field of view on 3 occasions: MJD 51220, 51263 and 51310. It was on this last date that it was discovered (its only significant detection). 2.3. SXP2.37 SMC X-2 RA 00 54 34, dec −73 41 03 History: SMC X-2 was discovered in SAS-3 observations of the SMC carried out by Clark et al. (1978). Further outbursts were also observed by HEAO 1 and ROSAT, but no pulsations were detected until it was observed in the present survey by RXTE during a long outburst lasting from January through to May, 2000 (Corbet et al. 2001; Laycock 2002). Survey Results: After the aforementioned outburst, SMC X-2 was only detected on 3 further occasions (MJD 51974, 52025 and 52228), but at a much lower flux of F xpul < 1 counts PCU−1 s−1(see Fig. 3). Lomb-Scargle analysis of the data following the major out- burst shows no clear periods. -- 12 -- Fig. 2. -- SXP0.92, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 13 -- Fig. 3. -- SXP2.37, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 14 -- 2.4. SXP2.76 RX J0059.2−7138 RA 00 59 11.7, dec −71 38 48 History: First reported by Hughes (1994) from a ROSAT observation showing 2.7632 s pulsations that varied greatly with energy. In the low-energy band of the ROSAT PSPC (0.07 -- 0.4 keV) the source appears almost unpulsed while in the high-energy band (1.0 -- 2.4 keV) the flux is ∼ 50% pulsed. Its optical counterpart was confirmed as a 14th magnitude Be star by Southwell & Charles (1996). Schmidtke et al. (2006) report a period of 82.1 d with a maximum at MJD 52188.9 from analysis of OGLE III data. Survey Results: This source is near the edge of the field of view of Position 1/A so we would expect to detect only the brighter outbursts. Only 2 detections were made (MJD 52527 and 53327) and no orbital period can be extracted from the X-ray data (see Fig. 4). We find no power at the reported optical period and note that the two X-ray detections occured ∼ 10 days after and ∼ 11 days before the optical ephemeris's predicted maximum. 2.5. SXP3.34 AX J0105−722, RX J0105.3−7210 RA 01 05 02, dec −72 11 00 History: Was reported as an ASCA source with 3.34300± 0.00003 s pulsations by Yokogawa & Koyama (1998c). Its optical counterpart is proposed to be [MA93] 1506 (Coe et al. 2005), who also find an 11.09 d modulation in MACHO data. Although this could be the orbital period of the system (as it falls within the expected range on the Corbet diagram (Corbet 1984)), Schmidtke & Cowley (2005a) report the find of a strong 1.099 d period in MACHO data and that the 11.09 d value is an alias of this main period. They attribute the modulation to non-radial pulsation in the Be star. Survey Results: There have been no significant detections of the pulsar during this survey and timing analysis of the light curve reveals no clear periodicities. 2.6. SXP4.78 XTE J0052−723 RA 00 52 06.6, dec −72 20 44 -- 15 -- Fig. 4. -- SXP2.76, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 16 -- History: Was discovered by the present survey in late December 2000 and reported in Laycock et al. (2003), where [MA93] 537 was proposed as the optical counterpart. Another possible counterpart is suggested in Coe et al. (2005) as the star AzV129 is found to have a 23.9± 0.1 d period in both MACHO colours, which would agree with the expected orbital period inferred from the Corbet diagram. Survey Results: SXP4.78 was detected on one occasion after its initial outburst (MJD 52729) at a much weaker F xpul≃ 0.8 counts PCU−1 s−1. It then began a relatively long, bright (peaking at ∼ 1.2 counts PCU−1 s−1) outburst on December 21, 2005 (MJD 53725) that lasted ∼ 7 weeks (see Fig. 5). Despite the long outburst, no orbital modulation is apparent. Timing analysis using all the data finds no periods, while analysis of the data outside the two bright outbursts suggests a weak period at 34.1 d A 1 ks observation with Chandra was carried out on March 3rd 2006 in an attempt to establish the pulsar's coordinates. Unfortunately, the outburst had ended and no source was detected within the RXTE error box provided by Laycock et al. (2003). 2.7. SXP6.85 XTE J0103−728 RA 01 02 53.1, dec = −72 44 33 History: First detected in April 2003 with a pulse period of 6.8482± 0.0007 s (Corbet et al. 2003b). It was detected in outburst with XMM on October 2nd 2006, which provided a more accurate position (Haberl et al. 2007). This allowed its optical counterpart to be identified as a Be star with V = 14.59, with a possible 24.82 d periodicity (Schmidtke & Cowley 2007). Survey Results: It has been detected on 3 other occasions (circa MJD 52885, 53440 and 53677) at varying fluxes (F xpul ≈ 0.8 -- 1.8 counts PCU−1 s−1), but high above the noise level (see Fig. 6). Lomb-Scargle analysis of the data outside the 4 bright detections shows no significant period. When including these outbursts, we find a significant period of 112.5 d; this is the minimum time lapse between any two outbursts and probably drives the result. Given its pulse period, and based on the spin-orbit relation, we do not discard the possibility that the real orbital period be 1 3 of this value. The current X-ray ephemeris is MJD 52318.5± 7.9 + n× 112.5± 0.5 d. We note that the outburst detected on October 2nd 2006 (MJD 54010) is consistent with the proposed ephemeris. 2 or 1 -- 17 -- Fig. 5. -- SXP4.78, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 18 -- Fig. 6. -- SXP6.85. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 19 -- 2.8. SXP7.78 SMC X-3 RA 00 52 05.8, dec −72 26 03.2 History: Originally detected by Clark et al. (1978), it was not identified with the previously detected RXTE 7.78 s source until 2004 (Edge et al. 2004a). Corbet et al. (2003c, 2004b) pro- posed an orbital period from a series of recurrent X-ray outbursts (in the present survey) of 45.1± 0.4 d. An optical modulation in MACHO data was reported by Cowley & Schmidtke (2004) (44.86 d) and Coe et al. (2005) (44.6± 0.2 d); Edge (2005d) also found a strong 44.8± 0.2 d modulation in the OGLE counterpart, present even when there was no significant X-ray activity. Survey Results: It has displayed in the past 10 years 3 distinct periods of outbursts (F xpul ≈ 0.3 counts PCU−1 s−1), lasting ∼ 200 -- 400 d (see Fig. 7(a)). Timing analysis of the complete light curve reveals a clear period at 44.92 d; the ephemeris we derive is MJD 52250.9± 1.4 + n× 44.92± 0.06 d. The folded light curve may show evidence of detections at apastron. During the longer of the outburst episodes (circa MJD 52500) the pulsar shows some spin up, about P = 3.7 × 10−10 s s−1, implying Lx ≥ 2.3× 1037 erg s−1 (B ≤ 3.6× 1012 G). This pulsar is unique in that, despite the spin up observed during each of the individual outburst episodes, the overall spin evolution seems to show a long-term spin down. 2.9. SXP8.02 CXOU J010042.8−721132 RA 01 00 41.8, dec −72 11 36 History: Proposed as the first anomalous X-ray pulsar (AXP) in the SMC by Lamb et al. (2002), they found the source to have displayed little variability in the past 20 years. It is characterised by a very soft spectrum and low luminosity (∼ 1.5× 1035 erg s−1). Survey Results: During AO5 and AO6 it was outside the field of view of our observations. Coverage from AO7 onwards has been good and timing analysis of these dates shows a possible periodicity at ∼ 23.2 d, which is likely driven by the only two clear detections, separated by that time range (see Fig. 8). This period disappears when removing these two detections from the data. If SXP8.02 is truly an anomalous pulsar, it is not expected to show periodicity in its X-ray emission. The two significant detections were observed at around Lx = 5.0× 1036 erg s−1 (unabsorbed, assuming a 50% pulse fraction and a power law spectrum of γ = 1). -- 20 -- Fig. 7. -- SXP7.78. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 21 -- Fig. 8. -- SXP8.02, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 22 -- 2.10. SXP8.88 RX J0051.8−7231, 1E0050.1−7247, 1WGA J0051.8−7231 RA 00 51 52.0, dec −72 31 51.7 History: Israel et al. (1997) detected this source several times between 1979 and 1993. A number of optical counterparts have been proposed, and Haberl & Sasaki (2000) believe [MA93] 506 to be the correct one. From a number of outbursts during July 2003 -- May 2004 Corbet et al. (2004a) derived an orbital ephemeris of MJD 52850± 2 + n× 28.0± 0.3 d. Schmidtke & Cowley (2006) find an optical period of 33.4 d in OGLE and MACHO data. Note: This system was incorrectly named SXP8.80 in Coe et al. (2005). Survey Results: Two Type II outbursts together with the aforementioned series of Type I outbursts have been detected (see Fig. 9). A period of ∼ 28 d is found using Lomb-Scargle analysis on the data not containing the Type II outbursts, similar to the value from Corbet et al. (2004a). The new ephemeris from the survey data is MJD 52392.2± 0.9 + n× 28.47± 0.04 d. We note that the two Type II outbursts began roughly at the times of expected maximum flux, lasted about 1 orbit, and peaked 0.5P orb later. This could be explained by a number of scenarios: a) The neutron star forms an accretion disc around periastron, which it consumes throughout the orbit; b) an accretion disc is formed around periastron which is accreted onto the neutron star along the orbit at the same time as wind accretion (which would peak around apastron) is taking place; c) the Be star ejects matter forcefully enough that it moves outwards as an annulus and the neutron star is able to capture material along its orbit as it moves away from the Be star, but capture decreases as soon as it passes apastron. None of these scenarios completely explain the behaviour of the X-ray emission during the Type II outbursts. If a) is correct, then why would accretion become greatest at apastron on both occasions. Scenario c) suffers a similar drawback as it would require the annulus to move at similar speeds on both outbursts in order for the outburst to peak precisely at apastron. Scenario b) would require a very dense wind in order for its accretion to be comparable to disc accretion. Simultaneous observations of this system in the X-ray and the optical during an outburst would help clarify this behaviour. 2.11. SXP9.13 AX J0049−732, RX J0049.2−7311 RA 00 49 13.6, dec −73 11 39 History: Discovered during an ASCA observation in November 1997 (MJD 50765), pulsa- -- 23 -- Fig. 9. -- SXP8.88. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 24 -- tions were detected at 9.1321± 0.0004 s and Lx = 3.3× 1035 erg s−1 (Imanishi et al. 1998). There has been much debate as to which is the correct optical counterpart to this source, Schmidtke et al. (2004) and Filipovi´c et al. (2000) identify it with the ROSAT source RX J0049.5−7310 but Coe et al. (2005) conclude that it is a Hα source coincident with RX J0049.2−7311. Timing analysis of the OGLE data shows a peak at 40.17 d and its probable harmonic at 20.08 d (Edge 2005d). It should be noted that Schmidtke et al. (2004) find a 91.5 d or possibly an ∼ 187 d period for RX J0049.5−7310. It was detected by ASCA on one further occasion on MJD 51645 at Lx = 1.9× 1035 erg s−1 (Yokogawa et al. 2003). Survey Results: Although coverage of this source has been very complete, it has only been detected in outburst 3 times (circa MJD 53545, 53700 and 53780). Lomb-Scargle analysis of data prior to this date shows power at a period of 77.4 d; when analysing the whole data set, the most significant peak is at 77.2 d (Fig. 10(b)). In both cases the ephemerides agree with the 3 outbursts (Fig. 10(a)), which strongly suggests this could be the orbital period of the system. However, it should be noted that this value is different from the reported optical periods. The ephemeris we derive is MJD 52380.5± 2.3 + n× 77.2± 0.3 d. The above reported ASCA detections did not find the system in outburst and cannot be used to ratify this ephemeris. 2.12. SXP15.3 RX J0052.1−7319 RA 00 52 14, dec −73 19 19 History: Lamb et al. (1999) found 15.3 s pulsations in ROSAT and BATSE data from 1996. They estimate the luminosity to be ∼ 1037 erg s−1 with a pulse fraction of ∼ 27%. Edge (2005d) finds an ephemeris of MJD 50376.1 + n× 75.1± 0.5 d describes the modulation in the MACHO and OGLE light curves. It should be noted that this ephemeris is likely driven by the large 1996 X-ray outburst which is clearly visible in the OGLE data; this Type II outburst peaked around MJD 50375. Survey Results: There was a very minor detection of SXP15.3 in February 2000 (MJD 51592), and a more significant one in August 2003 (MJD 52883) at F xpul ≃ 1.6 counts PCU−1 s−1 (see Fig. 11). Two more bright detections separated by 13 days occurred in March 2005 (circa MJD 53445); then, on July 12th (MJD 53564) a very bright outburst began, lasting until October 17th (MJD 53661, ∼ 100 days long). During this time the pulsed flux oscillated between ∼ 2.0 and ∼ 5.6 counts PCU−1 s−1. A clear spin up is detected up until September 15th, when the period started increasing. The maximum period change was ∆P = 3.3× 10−2 -- 25 -- Fig. 10. -- SXP9.13. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 26 -- over the course of 56.68 d, giving a P = 6.74× 10−9 s s−1. We derive the expected luminosity (see Appendix B for method) from such a level of spin up (if it were all intrinsic with no orbital contribution) to be Lx ≥ 8.6× 1037 erg s−1 (B ≤ 1.5× 1013 G). It is likely this outburst lasted for more than one orbital cycle (expected to be ∼ 30 -- 50 d from the Corbet diagram) so some orbital modulation might be visible in the period data. An attempt was made to fit these data to an orbital model with constant global spin up, and also with a piece-wise approach where the spin up varies throughout the outburst (following the method outlined in Wilson et al. (2003)). Although no definite value was found, variations in the period curve suggest a period of ∼ 28 d. Timing analysis of the data outside the long outburst revealed no periodicities. Fur- thermore, the optical ephemeris proposed by Edge (2005d) does not agree with any of the detections for this source. 2.13. SXP16.6 XTE J0050−731 No position available History: Discovered with a deep 121 ks observation taken for this survey in September 2000. It was initially misidentified as RX J0051.8−7310 but later disproved Yokogawa et al. (2002), and so SXP16.6 remains unassociated with any known source, although it is often still mistakenly referred to as RX J0051.8−7310. Survey Results: There have been a large number of detections of SXP16.6, and Lomb- Scargle analysis finds a strong modulation at 33.72 d (see Fig. 12(b)), which we propose as the orbital period of the system. The ephemeris is MJD 52373.5± 1.0 + n× 33.72± 0.05 d. 2.14. SXP18.3 XTE J0055−727 RA 00 50, dec −72 42 History: Reported by Corbet et al. (2003e) from observations in November/December 2003. An approximate position was established from scans with RXTE's PCA (Corbet et al. 2003e). No optical counterpart has yet been identified. A number of further outbursts be- tween May -- October 2004 provide an ephemeris of MJD 53145.7± 1.3 + n× 34.6± 0.4 d from O-C (observed vs. calculated) orbital calculations (Corbet et al. 2004d). -- 27 -- Fig. 11. -- SXP15.3, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 28 -- Fig. 12. -- SXP16.6. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 29 -- Survey Results: A long, bright outburst began around MJD ∼ 53925 (July 2006), which was ongoing as of January 2007 (see Fig. 13(a)). Lomb-Scargle analysis of data prior to this outburst finds a peak at 17.73 d, which is ∼ 1 2 the period proposed by Corbet et al. (2004d). We find no significant power at this period and note that some of the significant detections do not agree with it. Thus, the new ephemeris for this system is MJD 52275.6± 0.9 + n× 17.73± 0.01 d. 2.15. SXP22.1 RX J0117.6−7330 RA 01 17 40.5, dec −73 30 52.0 History: Discovered with ROSAT as an X-ray transient in September 1992 (Clark et al. 1996), its companion was identified as a 14.2 magnitude OB star by Charles et al. (1996). It was observed with ROSAT again in October, but no pulsations were detected (Clark et al. 1997) The companion's classification as a Be (B1-2) star was confirmed by Coe et al. (1998). 22 s pulsations were finally detected in ROSAT and BATSE data by Macomb et al. (1999). Survey Results: There are only 3 observations of this pulsar's region and it was not significantly detected in any of them. 2.16. SXP31.0 XTE J0111.2−7317, AX J0111.1−7316 RA 01 11 09.0, dec −73 16 46.0 History: Was simultaneously discovered by RXTE and BATSE during a giant outburst that began late October 1998 (Chakrabarty et al. 1998; Wilson & Finger 1998). Schmidtke et al. (2006) report a 90.4 d periodicity in OGLE III data. Survey Results: Being in the same field as SMC X-1, it was only observed 3 times, the first during the end of the aforementioned giant outburst. The two detections are ∼ 43 days apart and a spin up of 0.4 s is measured, which implies a luminosity of Lx ≥ 2.7× 1038 erg s−1. As Laycock et al. (2005), in an in depth spectral analysis of these observations, derive a value of Lx ≥ 4.6× 1037 erg s−1, we can assume we are seeing Doppler shifted periods due to orbital motion. No further information can be derived from these observations. -- 30 -- Fig. 13. -- SXP18.3. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve (for clarity, only every other -- 31 -- 2.17. SXP34.1 RX J0055.4−7210 RA 00 55 26.9, dec −72 10 59.9 History: Discovered in archival Chandra data at 34.08± 0.03 s and lying 0.6 arcsec from a known ROSAT source (Edge et al. 2004d,c). Survey Results: Only two significant detections are seen (MJD 50777 and 53690) and no clear periods can be found with timing analysis (see Fig. 14). 2.18. SXP46.6 XTE J0053−724, 1WGA 0053.8−7226 RA 00 53 58.5, dec −72 26 35 History: Discovered in the first observation of this survey (November 25th 1998) with a period of 46.63± 0.04 s while it was undergoing a long outburst (Corbet et al. 1998). Laycock et al. (2005) derive a period of 139± 6 d from 6 X-ray outbursts in the earlier part of this survey. Two candidates for the optical counterpart were proposed by Buckley et al. (2001). Schmidtke et al. (2007) confirm it is star B and find two periods in OGLE data: 69.2± 0.3 d and 138.4± 0.9 d; they suggest the possibility that the orbital period is the shorter or the two values. Survey Results: The source was thought to be inactive after January 2002. In the mean- time a new SMC pulsar with a 46.4 s period was announced (Corbet et al. 2002). Lomb- Scargle analysis of both pulsars revealed the same orbital periods and very similar ephemeris, suggesting they were the same pulsar which has been slowly spinning up (Galache et al. P = 1.05× 10−9 s s−1 during MJD 2005). The estimated luminosity required for a spin up of 50800 -- 51900 is Lx ≥ 9.9× 1035 erg s−1 (B ≤ 6.0× 1012 G), and for a P = 4.68 × 10−10 s s−1 during MJD, Lx ≥ 4.4× 1035 erg s−1 (B ≤ 4.0× 1012 G). The ephemeris of the outbursts is now best described by MJD 52293.9± 1.4 + n× 137.36± 0.35 d (see Fig. 15(a)). Although the folded light curve shows a small increase in flux half a phase away from maximum, we do not believe this is evidence that the orbital period is half the calculated value. Given the clear, regular outbursts experienced by this system throughout the survey we believe the true orbital period is ∼ 137 d. -- 32 -- Fig. 14. -- SXP34.1, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 33 -- Fig. 15. -- SXP46.6. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 34 -- 2.19. SXP51.0 SMC 51 No position available History: Was erroneously proposed as a new 25.5 s pulsar in Lamb et al. (2002) from a deep 121 ks observation. Laycock (2002) identifies the 25.5 s peaks in the power spectrum as harmonics of SXP51.0's true pulse period. No position is available; it lies within Position 4, and most likely in the overlap between Positions 1/A and 4. Survey Results: Despite numerous significant detections (see Fig. 16), timing analysis finds no strong periodicities in the light curve. 2.20. SXP59.0 XTE J0055−724, RX J0054.9−7226, 1WGA J0054.9−7226 RA 00 54 56.6, dec −72 26 50 History: Discovered in RXTE observations of the vicinity of SMC X-3 (Marshall et al. 1998), it showed 4 bright, very similar, outbursts during January 1998 -- September 1999 from which Laycock et al. (2005) derived an orbital period of 123± 1 d. The optical counterpart was established by Stevens et al. (1999); Schmidtke & Cowley (2005b) found a 60.2± 0.8 d period from timing analysis of OGLE and MACHO data which they propose as the orbital period. Survey Results: SXP59.0 remained undetected from September 1999 until a bright out- burst in mid 2002 (circa MJD 52520) kicked off a series of 5 outbursts (see Fig. 17(a)). From the whole data range we extract an ephemeris of MJD 52306.1± 3.7 + n× 122.10± 0.38 d. We note that this period is twice the optical period but we detect no significant flux half a phase from maximum that would suggest the orbital period is not 122 days. P = 4.7 × 10−9 s s−1 and During the 1998 -- 99 outbursts a spin up was detected of P = 5.9 × 10−9 s s−1. The again throughout the 5 outbursts of 2002 -- 2003, with a value of luminosities associated with these spin ups are, respectively, Lx ≥ 2.6× 1036 erg s−1 (B ≤ 1.3× 1013 G) and Lx ≥ 3.3× 1036 erg s−1 (B ≤ 1.4× 1013 G). In between both groups of out- bursts SXP59.0 was observed to have spun down during the ∼ 1100 days it was undetected. The average spin down was P = −4.2 × 10−9 s s−1, which would be associated with an esti- mated Lx ≥ 2.9× 1036 erg s−1. Although SXP59.0 was further away from the center of the field of view during AO5 -- AO6 (MJD 51600 -- 52300), it should have been picked up as a number of the detections during the second outburst season were made when RXTE was -- 35 -- Fig. 16. -- SXP51.0, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 36 -- pointing at Position D (essentially the same coordinates as Position 5). In view of this, the spin down mechanism for SXP59.0 must be something other than reverse accretion torque and is likely due to the propeller effect. 2.21. SXP65.8 CXOU J010712.6-723533 RA 01 07 12.63, dec −72 35 33.8 History: Discovered as part of a Chandra survey of the SMC wing that is reported in McGowan et al. (2007). They detected a source at Lx = 3× 1036 erg s−1 (37± 5% pulse frac- tion) with pulsations at 65.78± 0.13 s. Its position was found to coincide with the emission line star [MA93] 1619, a V = 16.6 Be star. A 110.6 d period has been observed in the MACHO data for this object (Schmidtke & Cowley 2007b). Survey Results: Due to its location outside the heavily observed positions, this pulsar has very little data. We find no significant detections and no periodic modulation is apparent in the X-ray light curve. 2.22. SXP74.7 RX J0049.1−7250, AX J0049−729 RA 00 49 04, dec −72 50 54 History: Discovered in the first observation of this survey with a period of 74.8± 0.4 s (Corbet et al. 1998). Kahabka & Pietsch (1998) identified it with the ROSAT source RX J0049.1−7250 and Stevens et al. (1999) found a single Be star within the ROSAT error radius which they proposed as the optical counterpart. Only 3 X-ray outbursts where observed in the early stages of this survey (before MJD 52300), from which Laycock et al. (2005) derived a possible orbital period of 642± 59 d based on the separation between the outbursts. Schmidtke & Cowley (2005b) and Edge (2005d) find a 33.4 d periodicity in OGLE data. Survey Results: Lomb-Scargle analysis of the data finds a period at ∼ 62 d, which although not strong, shows a convincing profile (see Fig. 18(b)); its ephemeris is MJD 52319.0± 3.1 + n× 61.6± 0.2 d. There is a weak peak in the power spectrum at 33.2 d, close to the reported optical period, but folding the light curve at this period does not produce a clear modulation. -- 37 -- Fig. 17. -- SXP59.0. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 38 -- Fig. 18. -- SXP74.7. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 39 -- 2.23. SXP82.4 XTE J0052−725 RA 00 52 09, dec −72 38 03 History: First observed by RXTE in this survey (Corbet et al. 2002), its position was determined from archival Chandra observations (Edge et al. 2004b). OGLE data show a strong modulation at ∼ 380 d (Edge 2006, private communication). Survey Results: The Lomb-Scargle periodogram for the light curve shows a very significant peak at ∼ 362 d with a number of harmonics (see Fig. 19(b)); the ephemeris derived is MJD 52089.0± 3.6 + n× 362.3± 4.1 d. Although this period is longer than would be expected given its P s position in the Corbet diagram, its similarity to the optical period would seem to confirm it is the actual orbital period of the system. We note that in the aforementioned Chandra observation of this puslar on MJD 52459, it was detected at Lx = 3.4× 1036 erg s−1 (Edge et al. 2004c); this date is ∼ 8 days after our predicted periastron passage and the luminosity exhibited is consistent with a Type I outburst (which was also detected with RXTE see Fig. 19(a)). 2.24. SXP89.0 XTE SMC pulsar No position available History: Reported by Corbet et al. (2004b) from observations in March 2002, it is located within the field of view of Position 1/A. Survey Results: The first outburst is a single detection in February 2000 (MJD 51592), 2 years before the official discovery; 4 others occurred 2 years later in a short space of time -- within ∼ 260 days (see Fig. 20(a)). They follow a high-low-high-low brightness pattern, with very similar high/low countrates. The separation between them is ∼ 88 d which could be expected to be the orbital period. In fact, timing analysis finds a strong period at 87.6 d, with an ephemeris of MJD 52337.5± 6.1 + n× 87.6± 0.3 d. 2.25. SXP91.1 AX J0051−722, RX J0051.3−7216 RA 00 50 55, dec −72 13 38 -- 40 -- Fig. 19. -- SXP82.4. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 41 -- Fig. 20. -- SXP89.0. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 42 -- History: Discovered in the first observation in this survey with a period of 92± 1.5 s (Marshall et al. 1997), further analysis improved this measurement to 91.12± 0.05 s (Corbet et al. 1998). An orbital period of 115± 5 d was derived by Laycock et al. (2005) from early survey data (before MJD 52200). Stevens et al. (1999) identified the optical counterpart; Schmidtke et al. (2004) find an 88.25 d period in their analysis of MACHO data for this star. Survey Results: Corbet et al. (2004b) reported the discovery of a new 89 s pulsar from XTE observations in March 2002, it was located within the field of view of Position 1/A. After studying the long-term lightcurves of these two pulsars, we believe SXP89.0 is actually SXP91.1 after having spun up (see Fig. 21(a)). The Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the whole light curve returns a period of ∼ 101 d, which is slightly shorter than the period found by Laycock et al. (2005). Timing analysis of the light curve post MJD 52300 shows no clear periods. The ephemeris we derive is MJD 52197.9± 8.2 + n× 117.8± 0.5 d. The average spin up during MJD 50750 -- 51550 is calculated to be P = 1.8× 10−8 s s−1, with a luminosity of Lx ≥ 3.6× 1036 erg s−1 (B ≤ 2.5× 1013 G). Given the proximity in spin period between SXP91.1 and SXP89.0, and the fact that the optical orbital period of SXP91.1 is so similar to the X-ray period of SXP89.0, it is possible that they may be one and the same pulsar. In Fig. 22(a) we show the consolidated light curve for both pulsars showing the possibility that SXP91.1 spun up sufficiently to be later detected as a separate pulsar. We are hesitant to claim they are one single system because the orbital ephemeris of this consolidated data set does not coincide with either system's ephemeris: MJD 52301.2± 3.0 + n× 101.3± 0.4 d. However, the orbital profile (see Fig. 22(b)) is convincing and appears similar to that of SXP8.88 (Fig. 9(b)) or SXP18.3 (Fig. 13(b)). 2.26. SXP95.2 SMC 95 RA 00 52, dec −72 45 History: Was discovered in March 1999 in data from this survey (Laycock et al. 2002); an approximate position was obtained with PCA scans over the source and has a large uncertainty. The X-ray orbital period suggested from the two bright outbursts before MJD 52300 is 283± 8 d (Laycock et al. 2005). Survey Results: Only 3 other marginal detections are available in the data (see Fig. 23). Lomb-Scargle analysis does not return any clear period, either including or excluding the two bright outbursts, although the former has its highest power at 71.3 d, an ephemeris that -- 43 -- Fig. 21. -- SXP91.1. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 44 -- Fig. 22. -- Consolidated light curve of SXP89.0 and SXP91.1. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light -- 45 -- is consistent with the source's significant detections and may reflect its orbital period. 2.27. SXP101 RX J0057.3−7325, AX J0057.4−7325 RA 00 57 26.8, dec −73 25 02 History: Discovered in an ASCA observation at a period of 101.45± 0.07 s (Yokogawa et al. 2000a), and identified also as a ROSAT source. Two optical counterparts were suggested by Edge & Coe (2003); from a Chandra observation McGowan et al. (2007) pinpoint the counterpart as a V = 14.9 star that exhibits a 21.9 d periodicity in both OGLE III and MACHO data. Schmidtke & Cowley (2007b) find the same period. Survey Results: This pulsar lies in the SE edge of the wing and was in the field of view of Positions 4 and 5, so coverage is only continuous throughout AO5 and AO6 (see Fig. 24); during this time only 3 outbursts of low brightness were observed (MJD 51814, 51863 and 52137). Timing analysis returns no significant periods, although the highest peak in the periodogram is at 25.2 d, similar to the optical period. 2.28. SXP138 CXOU J005323.8−722715 RA 00 53 23.8, dec −72 27 15.0 History: Discovered in archival Chandra data (Edge et al. 2004b), the optical counterpart is [MA93] 667 (Edge 2005d). The MACHO light curves for the companion star reveal peaks at ∼ 125.1 d intervals (stronger in the red band). Schmidtke & Cowley (2006) report finding a weak periodicity in the 122 -- 123 s region in MACHO data. Survey Results: X-ray data from this survey show two brighter detections ∼ 112 d apart (see Fig. 2.28(a)). Lomb-Scargle analysis finds no significant periods; however, if these two detections are removed from the data, a period of 103.6 d appears in the power spectrum. Its ephemerides (shown by the vertical, dashed lines in Fig. 2.28(a)) do not correspond with the two detections, and the profile (see bottom panel of Fig. 2.28(b)) looks almost sinusoidal, unlike the profiles exhibited by other systems in the SMC. The maxima for this period occur at MJD 52400.2± 5.2 + n× 103.6± 0.5 d. -- 46 -- Fig. 23. -- SXP95.2, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 47 -- Fig. 24. -- SXP101, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 48 -- Fig. 25. -- SXP138. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 49 -- 2.29. SXP140 XMMU J005605.2−722200, 2E0054.4−7237 RA 00 56 05.7, dec −72 22 00 History: Discovered in XMM observations by Sasaki et al. (2003). The optical counterpart is believed to be [MA93] 904 (Haberl & Pietsch 2004). Schmidtke & Cowley (2006) find a 197± 5 d period in MACHO data. Survey Results: None of the detections has been longer than 1 week, with only 2 of them showing significant brightness (see Fig. 26). Timing analysis returns no clear periods, although the periodogram of the data, excluding the two bright detections, does show some power at ∼ 197 d. As a number of different periods have similar power, this may only be coincidence. The folded light curve at 197 d does not show a typical orbital profile. 2.30. SXP144 XTE SMC pulsar No position available History: Detected in observations from this survey in April 2003 by Corbet et al. (2003b), who later reported an ephemeris of MJD 52779.2± 2.9 + n× 61.2± 1.6 d (Corbet et al. 2003d). Survey Results: Although there are a few minor detections before the initial discovery, April 2003 (∼ MJD 52750) saw the beginning of a regular pattern of outbursts which contin- ued until February 2006 (∼ MJD 53800, see Fig. 27(a)). The neutron star has displayed an ex- tremely linear and constant spin down during this time, with an average P = 1.6×10−8 s s−1, from which we derive a Lx ≥ 1.1× 1036 erg s−1 (B ≤ 2.4× 1013 G). The improved outburst ephemeris from Lomb-Scargle analysis is MJD 52368.9± 1.8 + n× 59.38± 0.09 d. This pe- riod is shorter than might have have expected from the pulse-orbit relationship, but what is most unusual about this pulsar is that it is spinning down, moving it even further away from the Be group on the Corbet diagram. 2.31. SXP152 CXOU J005750.3−720756 RA 00 57 49, dec −72 07 59 -- 50 -- Fig. 26. -- SXP140, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 51 -- Fig. 27. -- SXP144. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 52 -- History: Haberl & Sasaki (2000) suggested that this object is a Be binary pulsar based on the Hα-emitting object [MA93] 1038, although ROSAT observations of this source had not detected any pulsations. These were found in a long Chandra observation by Macomb et al. (2003) at a period of 152.098± 0.016 s (they report a very high pulse fraction of 64± 3% and a Lx = 2.6× 1035 erg s−1), and in an XMM observation by Sasaki et al. (2003) at 152.34± 0.05 s. Survey Results: The observational history is shown in Fig. 28. The periodogram of the light curve shows no clear orbital period, although the highest power peak is at ∼ 107 d, which would agree with the expected value from the Corbet diagram. The lack of periodic outbursts, despite its clear X-ray activity, may point towards a low eccentricity system. This would limit accretion onto the neutron star to times when the Be star ejecta are dense enough, and would be independent of the orbital phase. Analysis of the optical light curve of the companion Be star is needed. 2.32. SXP169 XTE J0054−720, AX J0052.9−7158, RX J0052.9−7158 RA 00 52 54.0, dec −71 58 08.0 History: First detected by RXTE in December 1998 at a period of 169.30 s (Lochner et al. 1998). Laycock et al. (2005) suggested a possible orbital period of 200± 40 d. Galache et al. (2005) reported an orbital period of 68.6± 0.2 d based on data from this survey while Schmidtke et al. (2006) found a period of 67.6± 0.3 d in OGLE -III data. Survey Results: Corbet et al. (2004b) announced a new SMC pulsar at 164.7 s, with an unknown position. After comparing the long term light curves and the ephemerides from timing analysis it became apparent that SXP165 and SXP169 were the same source. A consolidated light curve is presented here (Fig. 29(a)), where the spin up of SXP169 throughout the survey is apparent. The estimated spin up during MJD 50800 -- 51500 is P = 2.5 × 10−8 s s−1, implying Lx ≥ 1.2× 1036 erg s−1 (B ≤ 3.0× 1013 G); for the remaining data the spin up is P = 2.0×10−8 s s−1, implying Lx ≥ 9.6× 1035 erg s−1 (B ≤ 2.6× 1013 G). Lomb- Scargle analysis provides a clear period, and the outbursts are described by the ephemeris MJD 52240.1± 2.1 + n× 68.54± 0.15 d, in agreement with the reported optical period. 2.33. SXP172 AX J0051.6−7311, RX J0051.9−7311 RA 00 51 52, dec −73 10 35 -- 53 -- Fig. 28. -- SXP152, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 54 -- Fig. 29. -- SXP169. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 55 -- History: Found in an ASCA observation (Torii et al. 2000), it was identified with the ROSAT source RX J0051.9−7311, which has a Be optical counterpart (Cowley et al. 1997). Laycock et al. (2005) suggest a possible orbital period of ∼ 67 d based on the X-ray activity up until MJD 52350. Schmidtke & Cowley (2006) report an optical period of 69.9± 0.6 d in OGLE II data. This pulsar has been detected on 17 occasions by EINSTEIN, ROSAT and ASCA, but never above Lx = 7.8× 1035 erg s−1 (Yokogawa et al. 2000c). Survey Results: SXP172 underwent a phase of intense, semi-regular, activity during MJD 51600 -- 52400 (see Fig. 30). Lomb-Scargle analysis was carried using only data from this period, and also the whole data set, with no conclusive outcome. However, it is clear that the series of outbursts during the aforementioned dates are separated by ∼ 70 days (consistent with the optical period). It is possible we are seeing contamination from another pulsar of similar pulse period, maybe located within a different pointing position. As past missions did not detect this pulsar in outburst, it is hard to confirm an X-ray ephemeris. 2.34. SXP202 XMMU J005920.8−722316 RA 00 59 20.8, dec −72 23 16 History: Detected in a number of archival XMM observations and reported in Majid et al. (2004); the authors found an early B type star at the X-ray coordinates and classified it as a HMXB. Survey Results: This source has shown little bright activity throughout the survey except for the outburst in January 2006 (circa MJD 53740, see Fig. 31). Lomb-Scargle analysis of the data returns no clear period, but we note that a ∼ 91 d orbital period would agree with the 6 outburst detections since MJD 53000. 2.35. SXP264 XMMU J004723.7−731226, RX J0047.3−7312, AX J0047.3−7312 RA 00 47 23.7, dec −73 12 25 History: It was initially reported by Yokogawa et al. (2003) from ASCA observations, al- though it had previously been detected (yet remained undiscovered) in earlier XMM observa- tions (Ueno et al. 2004). It had originally been proposed as a Be/X-ray binary candidate by Haberl & Sasaki (2000) based on its X-ray variability. Edge et al. (2005a) identified the com- -- 56 -- Fig. 30. -- SXP172, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 57 -- Fig. 31. -- SXP202, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 58 -- panion as the emission line star [MA93] 172 and found an optical period of 48.8± 0.6 d, which they propose as the orbital period of the system. Further analysis of the OGLE light curve finds an ephemeris of MJD 50592± 2 + n× 49.2± 0.2 d (Edge 2005d). Schmidtke & Cowley (2005b) found a 49.1 d period in OGLE data. Survey Results: Due to its location this pulsar was only observed consistently during AO5 and AO6 (see Fig. 32). No major outbursts were detected and the power spectrum shows no significant peak at the optical period, nor at any other. We note that the optical ephemeris does not agree with the X-ray activity. 2.36. SXP280 RX J0057.8−7202, AX J0058−72.0 RA 00 57 48.2, dec −72 02 40 History: Discovered in March 1998 in an ASCA observation by Yokogawa & Koyama It is identified with the Be star [MA93] 1036, and (1998a) at a period of 280.4± 0.3 s. Schmidtke et al. (2006) find a 127.3 d period in its OGLE data with an epoch of maximum brightness at MJD 52194.7. This pulsar was observed on 15 occasions by EINSTEIN, ROSAT and ASCA, but never detected above Lx = 6.0× 1035 erg s−1 (Tsujimoto et al. 1999). Survey Results: There are only 5 clear detections of this source throughout the survey, and the power spectrum shows no significant periods, although the highest peak is at 64.8 d, which is ∼ 1 2 of the optical period. For this reason, the ephemeris lines and folded light curve are shown in Fig. 33. The tentative ephemeris of the X-ray period is MJD 52312± 6 + n× 64.8± 0.2 d, which is within ∼ 12 d of the epoch of peak optical flux. A lack of earlier detections of this system in outburst makes it difficult to firmly establish an X-ray ephemeris. 2.37. SXP293 XTE J0051−727 No position available History: Reported by Corbet et al. (2004c) from observations during this survey of the outburst at MJD 53097. Survey Results: Only one of the 6 outbursts lasts longer than one week (Fig. 34(a)), which could imply this is a Type II outburst, and thus not expected to coincide with periastron passage. For this reason, it was removed from the data after initial timing analysis produced -- 59 -- Fig. 32. -- SXP264, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 60 -- Fig. 33. -- SXP280. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 61 -- no results. The resulting power spectrum, while not showing any significant periods, does have its strongest peak at 151 d, an ephemeris that agrees well with the remaining 5 detec- tions. We suggest this is the likely orbital period of the system, with an ephemeris of MJD 52327.3± 4.5 + n× 151± 1 d. 2.38. SXP304 RX J0101.0−7206, CXOU J010102.7−720658 RA 01 01 01.7, dec −72 07 02 History: Discovered in Chandra observations at 304.49± 0.13 s, the optical counterpart is identified as the emission line star [MA93] 1240 (Macomb et al. 2003). The authors mea- sured an unusually high pulse fraction of 90± 8% at a luminosity of Lx = 1.1× 1034 erg s−1. Schmidtke & Cowley (2006) suggest there may be a 520± 12 d period in MACHO data of the optical counterpart [MA93] 1240. Survey Results: This source was out of the field of view during AO5 and AO6, so it has only been adequately covered from AO7 onwards. A number of small outbursts were detected during MJD 52600 -- 53000 (see Fig. 35), and it was not detected again until recently, in MJD 53747, when it began a 2 -- 3 week outburst, the longest and brightest observed so far in this survey. Lomb-Scargle analysis of the data outside of this outburst finds moderate power at ∼ 50 d and no significant power at the optical period. It should be noted that this source displays X-ray activity on timescales much shorter than the reported 520 d optical period. 2.39. SXP323 RX J0050.7−7316, AX J0051−733 RA 00 50 44.8, dec −73 16 06.0 History: Pulsations at 323.2± 0.4 s were detected in November 1997 (Yokogawa & Koyama 1998a) at the coordinates of the ROSAT source RX J0050.7−7316. Cowley et al. (1997) identified the optical counterpart as a Be star. This system has been found to exhibit optical and IR variability at periods of ∼ 0.7 and 1.4 d (Coe et al. 2002) and 1.695 d (Coe et al. 2005). These periods are too short to be the orbital period of the system and are most likely non- radial pulsations in the Be star. Laycock et al. (2005) suggest an orbital period of 109± 18 d from X-ray data earlier in this survey. Survey Results: This pulsar showed quite regular, bright activity during the survey (see -- 62 -- Fig. 34. -- SXP293. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 63 -- Fig. 35. -- SXP304, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 64 -- Fig. 36(a)). We found that the outburst circa MJD 52960 skewed the timing analysis results, which we attribute to it being a Type II outburst; for this reason it was excluded from the analysis. The ephemeris found for the remaining outbursts is MJD 52336.9± 3.5 + n× 116.6± 0.6 d, which is consistent with the orbital period proposed by Laycock et al. (2005). 2.40. SXP348 RX J0102−722, SAX J0103.2 −7209, AX J0103.2−7209 RA 01 03 13.0, dec −72 09 18.0 History: Pulsations at 345.2± 0.1 s were detected in BeppoSAX observations in July 1998 (Israel et al. 1998). Subsequently, pulsations at 348.9± 0.1 s were found in archival ASCA data from May 1996 implying a P = −5.39 × 10−8 s s−1 (Yokogawa & Koyama 1998b). The ROSAT source lies in a supernova remnant with a Be counterpart; a weak 93.9 d periodicity has been reported from OGLE data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2006). Israel et al. (2000) suggest this is a persistent, low luminosity X-ray system. Survey Results: Although this source has been detected by a number of different instru- ments, it was always at low luminosities (.1036 erg s−1), so it is not surprising that there are not many detections in the survey Fig. 37. Furthermore, it has also been detected at a wider range of periods than other pulsars (from 340 to 348 s), which makes it more difficult to pick out in the periodograms from weekly observations. Timing analysis reveals no significant periods. 2.41. SXP452 RX J0101.3−7211 RA 01 01 19.5, dec −72 11 22 History: Was initially proposed as an X-ray binary by Haberl et al. (2000). Pulsations were detected in XMM observations during 2001 at 455± 2 s and in 1993 ROSAT data at 450 -- 452 s (Sasaki et al. 2001), implying a P = 2.3 × 10−8 s s−1; the optical counterpart was identified as a Be star Sasaki et al. (2001). Schmidtke et al. (2004) propose an orbital period of 74.7 d for this system based on its optical variability. Survey Results: With only 5 detections throughout the survey (Fig. 38), this source's periodogram shows no periodicities and there is no evidence for the reported 74.7 d optical -- 65 -- Fig. 36. -- SXP323. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 66 -- Fig. 37. -- SXP348, X-ray amplitude light curve. period. -- 67 -- 2.42. SXP504 RX J0054.9−7245, AX J0054.87244, CXOU J005455.6−724510 RA 00 54 55.6, dec −72 45 10 History: Discovered in archival Chandra data with 503.5± 6.7 s pulsations (Edge et al. 2004d,c). Also reported by Haberl et al. (2004) from an XMM observation at 499.2± 0.7 s and Lx = 4.3× 1035 erg s−1. An orbital period of 268.0± 1.4 d was determined from op- tical (OGLE) data, and corroborated by preliminary X-ray data from the present sur- vey (Edge et al. 2005b). The optical ephemeris was later refined to MJD 50556± 3 + n× 268.0± 0.6 d (Edge et al. 2005c). Schmidtke & Cowley (2005b) found a period of 273 d in OGLE data. Survey Results: The light curve for this system can be seen in Fig. 39(a). Lomb-Scargle analysis of the entire survey (with or without the bright outbursts circa MJD 52440 and 52980) returns a slightly shorter orbital period to the optical one previously reported, but is consistent within errors. Furthermore, Edge et al. (2005c) find that the epochs of maxi- mum X-ray flux are coincident with the optical outbursts. The ephemeris we find is MJD 52167.4± 8.0 + n× 265.3± 2.9 d. This source displays a lot of activity in between periastron passages, which might be indicative of a low eccentricity orbit and makes timing analysis more difficult. 2.43. SXP565 CXOU J005736.2−721934 RA 00 57 36.2, dec −72 19 34 History: Discovered in Chandra observations at 564.81± 0.41 s with a pulse fraction of 48± 5% (Lx = 5.6× 1034 erg s−1), the optical counterpart is idenified as the emission line star [MA93] 1020 (Macomb et al. 2003). An optical period of 95.3 d has been reported for this system (Schmidtke et al. 2004), but this period is not seen in OGLE data (Edge 2005d). Survey Results: This source shows a lot of variability, but no clear outbursts (see Fig. 40(a)). The power spectrum returns two significant peaks, with only the higher one providing a con- vincing orbital profile. The ephemeris for this period is MJD 52219.0± 13.7 + n× 151.8± 1.0 d. We note there is no power at the reported optical period nor does the optical ephemeris agree -- 68 -- Fig. 38. -- SXP452, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 69 -- Fig. 39. -- SXP504. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 70 -- with the brightest X-ray detections of this source. In view of this, it is possible that the optical counterpart has been misidentified; however, there is no other bright candidate star within 10 arcsec of the very precise Chandra position. The folded light curve has a unique shape, showing significant activity around periastron. The asymmetry of the periastron peak is likely due to the presence of an accretion disk around the neutron star that is not completely consumed by the time it reaches apastron, where its lower orbital velocity allows it to "top up" its disk from the Be star's wind. 2.44. SXP700 CXOU J010206.6-714115 RA 01 02 06.69, dec −71 41 15.8 History: Discovered as part of the aforementioned Chandra survey of the SMC wing re- ported in McGowan et al. (2007). They detected a source with Lx = 6.0× 1035 erg s−1 (35± 5% pulse fraction) with pulsations at 700.54± 34.53 s and found its position to co- incide with the emission line star [MA93] 1301, a V = 14.6 O9 star. The OGLE data available for this object show a periodic modulation at 267.38± 15.10 d (McGowan et al. 2007). Survey Results: Due to its proximity in period to SXP701, limitations of the current anal- ysis script (which cannot work on two pulsars of such similar spin periods) have not allowed the extraction of an X-ray light curve for this pulsar. However, it has not contaminated the data presented for SXP701 because, even though they are ∼ 66 -- arcmin away from each other, they were never within the same field of view. 2.45. SXP701 RX J0055.2−7238, XMMU J005517.9−723853 RA 00 55 17.9, dec −72 38 53 History: First observed during an XMM TOO observation at 701.6± 1.4 s and located within the error circle of a ROSAT object (Haberl et al. 2004). Fabrycky (2005) finds optical periods of 6.832 and 15.587 h, which are attributed to stellar pulsations. A weak 412 d period has been seen in MACHO data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2005b). Survey Results: Similar to SXP565, it displays much X-ray variability with no bright outbursts (see Fig. 41). Unfortunately, timing analysis provides no clear periodicities. -- 71 -- Fig. 40. -- SXP565. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 72 -- Fig. 41. -- SXP701, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 73 -- 2.46. SXP756 RX J0049.6−7323, AX J0049.4−7323 RA 00 49 42.42, dec −73 23 15.9 History: Pulsations at 755.5± 0.6 s were detected in a very long (∼ 177 ks) ASCA observa- tion of the SMC in April 2000, the source was detected at a luminosity of Lx = 5× 1035 erg s−1 (Yokogawa et al. 2000b). The optical counterpart was later established as a V = 15 Be star (Edge & Coe 2003). Laycock (2002) and Laycock et al. (2005) find an X-ray period of 396± 5 d while Cowley & Schmidtke (2003); Schmidtke et al. (2004) report recurring out- bursts at ∼ 394 d intervals in R and V MACHO data. Survey Results: Coverage of this pulsar has been sparse due to its southern location in the SMC, only visible to observations of Positions 4 and 5. Despite this, it has been detected various times in outburst, the brightest of which was a 3 week outburst (Fig. 42(a)). We decided to remove the brightest point from this outburst so as not to skew the Lomb-Scargle power spectrum. A strong period is found at 194.9 d which we believe to be the first harmonic of the orbital period. Looking at the light curve it is evident that the bright detections are spaced ∼ 400 d apart3. Moreover, this would be in agreement with the optical period of the system, so we use twice the value of the harmonic as the orbital period and derive the ephemeris MJD 52196.1± 3.9 + n× 389.9± 7.0 d. This ephemeris places the first outburst in the data at MJD 51416, which is consistent with the last optical outburst available in the MACHO data (Cowley & Schmidtke 2003). 2.47. SXP1323 RX J0103.6−7201 RA 01 03 37.5, dec −72 01 33.2 History: This is the source with the longest known pulse period in the SMC, SXP1323 was reported by Haberl & Pietsch (2005) in a number of archival XMM observations. The authors identify the emission line star [MA93] 1393 (V ≃ 14.6) as the optical counterpart. Schmidtke & Cowley (2006) report three strong periods for this source from OGLE II data: 0.41 d, 0.88 d and 26.16 d; they attribute the first two to non-radial pulsations of the Be star but suggest the latter might be the orbital period. 3Also note that only one peak appears in the orbital profile in Fig. 42(b). If 194.9 d were the actual orbital period, the plot would show two peaks per orbital cycle. -- 74 -- Fig. 42. -- SXP756. a) Top: X-ray amplitude light curve. b) Middle: Lomb-Scargle power -- 75 -- Survey Results: This source is difficult to detect due to its long period (requiring ob- servations with a baseline longer than ∼ 4 ks) and its location near the edge of Position 1/A. Despite these limitations, a number of bright outbursts have been detected but no periodicities can be found in the sparse data (see Fig. 43). 3. Discussion Table 3 presents a summary of the timing analysis results for the SMC pulsars, providing orbital periods and ephemerides where available, together with periods observed at other wavelengths. In cases when there is only weak evidence for an orbital period in the X-ray data, the number is given in parentheses. Those systems with unequivocal orbital periods have allowed us to study and compare a selection of well-defined orbital profiles. In particular, we consider the profiles of the fol- lowing systems that have shown regular activity at, or around, periastron pasage: SXP6.85, SXP7.78, SXP46.6, SXP59.0, SXP82.4, SXP144, SXP169 and SXP756. It is notable that their profiles all share a similar shape, even though their orbital periods cover a wide range (from ∼ 45 -- 390 d): they are relatively narrow (except for SXP756, all widths are between 0.40 and 0.55 wide in orbital phase), and they are very symmetrical in shape (suggesting ac- cretion takes place fluidly and increases smoothly as the neutron star approaches the deccre- tion disk, to decrease in an equally smooth manner after periastron). Other systems display different characteristics, some show sharp rises with long declines (e.g.,SXP323, Fig. 36(b)), the opposite (e.g., SXP16.6, Fig. 12(b)), or even long, plateau-like profiles (e.g.,SXP280, Fig. 33(b)). A number of profiles show a small increase in flux half an orbital phase away from the maximum (e.g., SXP7.78, SXP89.0, SXP144, SXP504 and SXP565), suggesting that accretion is taking place on a smaller scale, possibly from the Be star's wind, when the neutron star is travelling slowly enough to accrete from it. Given the range of orbit sizes in the systems that exhibit this behaviour (judging from the orbital periods), it may be the eccentricity of the orbit that determines whether apastron accretion takes place (because the more eccentric the orbit, the slower the neutron star will be travelling at apastron). Throughout the length of the survey there have been some pulsars whose spin periods have undergone slow, persistent evolution, e.g., SXP7.78 (spin down), SXP46.6 (spin up), SXP59.0 (spin up) or SXP144 (spin down), while others have changed their pulse period over the course of a few weeks, e.g., SXP15.3 (spin up). And still, some other systems have not changed their spin periods significantly despite bright and/or persistent activity, e.g., -- 76 -- Fig. 43. -- SXP1323, X-ray amplitude light curve. -- 77 -- SXP2.37, SXP4.78 or SXP8.88. This suggests there are a number of pulsars that must be rotating close to, or at, their equilibrium spin periods, as suggested by Corbet (1984). A lack of modulation in the spin period throughout a long outburst (as in SXP18.3's outburst circa MJD 54000) further reveals systems that are likely being observed at a low inclination (face on). Unfortunately, despite the number of orbital periods known, it has still not been possible to calculate the complete set of orbital parameters of any SMC system (with the exception of SXP0.92 (Kaspi et al. 1993)), so orbital inclination angles and their effects on pulse arrival times remain a matter of speculation. An interesting case is presented by SXP348; Israel et al. (2000) suggest this is a persis- tent, low luminosity system, and recent Chandra observations (McGowan et al. 2007) tend to support this notion after detecting the pulsar at its shortest recorded pulse period until then, 337.5 s. Given that it was observed in 1996 at 349 s in ASCA data, we can deduce that it has spun down 11.5 s in ∼ 10 years, implying a P = 3.6 × 10−8 s s−1. An estimate for the accretion necessary to produce the required torque on this timescale implies a time- averaged X-ray luminosity of just Lx ≥ 3.3× 1035 erg s−1, which would explain why it was rarely detected during the present survey. However, RXTE detected it a number of times at longer pulse periods than would have been expected; a clear occasion was during the short outburst circa MJD 53740, when the system was detected at a high significance on 2 consecutive weeks with periods of 345.0 s and 336.2 s, respectively. If this spin-up were all intrinsic, the expected luminosity would be Lx ≥ 1.1× 1038 erg s−1, which is not inconceiv- able for a Type II outburst. McGowan et al. (2007) detected it 30 d later (MJD 53777) at Lx = 4.2× 1037 erg s−1, but RXTE did not detect it 2 days prior to that (MJD 53774). So what is happening in this system? It is not clear whether we are detecting orbitally-induced Doppler-shifted pulse periods or if SXP348 is actually undergoing massive spin up every time it outbursts. Given the pulse periods of the detections in Fig. 37, it is unclear whether the pulsar is, in fact, spinning down (as proposed by Israel et al. (2000)); it could very well be spinning up. Another case involving changes in spin is that of SXP59.0 (Fig. 17(a)). It went unde- tected by RXTE during MJD 51550 -- 52500, during which time its pulse period increased ∼ 0.45 s. If this spin-down were a product of reverse accretion torques, we would have ex- pected to see outbursts at Lx ≥ 2.6× 1036 erg s−1, comparable in strength with those detected during the survey. Although SXP59.0 was not close to the center of the field of view during the spin-down period (as it was for most of the rest of the survey), it should still have been detectable. This suggests that SXP59.0 was spun down through mechanisms other than reverse accretion torques, possibly through the propeller effect. Yet another example of strange spin behaviour is that of SXP144. Given its pulse period, -- 78 -- and based on the Corbet diagram, its orbital period should be ∼ 90 d; so with its clear 59.4 d orbital period, the expectation is that it would spin up during outburst. However, quite the opposite is what RXTE has detected. This system went into outburst at least once every orbit over a period of ∼ 1160 d, during which time it spun down ∼ 1.7 s. It would seem that factors other than just the orbital and spin periods govern the behaviour and evolution of these binary systems, and they need to be taken into account. Orbital eccentricity and/or the magnetic field strength of the pulsar are likely to be important factors in determining the relationship between the spin and orbital periods. 4. Conclusion We have presented the most comprehensive colection of pulsed light curves for 41 prob- able Be/X-ray systems in the SMC and have determined an X-ray (likely orbital) ephemeris for 21 of them while presenting possible periods for 6 others. 10 of these ephemerides are from new X-ray periods, while 6 others are improvements of previously known ephemerides. Of the systems exhibiting periodicities in the X-ray, 19 also show optical periodicities, al- though it is noteworthy that the optical and X-ray periods only agree on 7 occasions. Of the remaining 12, 3 show an optical period that is half the X-ray period while 1 exhibits an optical modulation that is twice the X-ray period. However, there are still 11 systems with a known optical period that show no modulation in X-rays. The systems exhibiting a large discrepancy between the optical and X-ray periods suggest the possibility that the optical counterpart to the X-ray system has been missidentified, or that the interaction be- tween the Be star's disk and the neutron star is more complicated than originally thought, although optical periods can be affected by pulsations of the primary star, and X-ray periods by Type II outbursts. Nonetheless, for extragalactic X-ray binaries, long-term monitoring has proven to be the most successful method of study. -- 79 -- Table 3. X-ray binary systems in the SMC Object P s (s) RA dec X-ray T P (MJD) X-ray P orb (days) Other P orb (days) SXP0.09 SXP0.72 SXP0.92 SXP2.16 SXP2.37 SXP2.76 SXP3.34 SXP4.78 SXP6.85 SXP7.78 SXP8.02 SXP8.88 SXP9.13 SXP15.3 SXP16.6 SXP18.3 SXP22.1 SXP31.0 SXP34.1 SXP46.6 SXP51.0 SXP59.0 SXP65.8 SXP74.7 SXP82.4 SXP89.0 SXP91.1 SXP95.2 SXP101 SXP138 SXP140 SXP144 SXP152 SXP169 SXP172 SXP202 SXP264 SXP280 SXP293 0.087 0.716 0.92 2.165 2.374 2.763 3.34 4.782 6.848 7.780 8.020 8.880 9.130 15.30 16.52 18.37 22.07 31.01 34.08 46.59 51.00 58.86 65.78 74.70 82.40 89.00 91.10 95.20 101.40 138.00 140.99 144.00 152.10 167.35 172.40 202.00 263.60 280.40 293.00 00 42 35.0 -73 40 30.0 01 17 05.2 -73 26 36.0 00 45 35.0 -73 19 02.0 01 19 00 -73 12 27 00 54 34.0 -73 41 03.0 00 59 11.7 -71 38 48.0 01 05 02.0 -72 11 00.0 00 52 06.6 -72 20 44 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 01 02 53.1 -72 44 33 52318.5 ± 7.9 00 52 06 -72 26 06 52250.9 ± 1.4 01 00 41.8 -72 11 36 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (34.1) 112.5 ± 0.5 44.92 ± 0.06 -- 00 51 52.0 -72 31 51.7 52392.2 ± 0.9 28.47 ± 0.04 -- -- 51a -- -- 82.1b -- 23.9c 24.82d 44.86e , 44.6f , 44.8g -- 33.4h 00 49 13.6 -73 11 39 52380.5 ± 2.3 77.2 ± 0.3 40.17g , 91.5i 00 52 14 -73 19 19 -- -- 00 50 -- -72 42 52373.5 ± 1.0 52275.6 ± 0.9 (28) 33.72 ± 0.05 17.73 ± 0.01 01 17 40.5 -73 30 52.0 01 11 09.0 -73 16 46.0 00 55 26.9 -72 10 59.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- 00 53 58.5 -72 26 35.0 52293.9 ± 1.4 137.36 ± 0.35 -- -- -- -- 00 54 56.6 -72 26 50 52306.1 ± 3.7 122.10 ± 0.38 01 07 12.63 -72 35 33.8 -- 00 49 04 00 52 09 -- 00 50 55 00 52 00 -72 50 54 -72 38 03 -- -72 13 38 -72 45 00 00 57 26.8 -73 25 02 52319.0 ± 3.1 52089.0 ± 3.6 52337.5 ± 6.1 52197.9 ± 8.2 -- -- -- 61.6 ± 0.2 362.3 ± 4.1 87.6 ± 0.3 117.8 ± 0.5 (71.3) (25.2) 75.1j -- 34.6k -- 90.4b 69.2l -- , 138.4l -- 60.2m 110.6n 33.4o ∼ 380p -- 88.25q -- 21.9r 00 53 23.8 -72 27 15.0 52400.5 ± 5.2 103.6 ± 0.5 ∼ 125s , 122 -- 123t 00 56 05.7 -72 22 00.0 -- -- -- -- 52368.9 ± 1.8 59.38 ± 0.09 00 57 49 -72 07 59 -- -- 00 52 54.0 -71 58 08.0 52240.1 ± 2.1 68.54 ± 0.15 00 51 52 -73 10 35 00 59 20.8 -72 23 17 00 47 23.7 -73 12 25 -- -- -- 00 57 48.2 -72 02 40 52312 ± 6 -- -- 52327.3 ± 4.5 (70) (91) -- 64.8 ± 0.2 151 ± 1 197t -- -- 67.6u 69.9v -- 49.2g , 49.1w 127.3u -- -- 80 -- Table 3 -- Continued Object P s (s) RA dec X-ray T P (MJD) X-ray P orb (days) Other P orb (days) 520t -- 93.9v 74.7x 268.0y , 273w 95.3q 267z 412aa 394ab 26.16v 304.49 321.20 344.75 452.01 503.50 564.83 01 01 01.7 -72 07 02 -- -- 00 50 44.8 -73 16 06.0 52336.9 ± 3.5 116.6 ± 0.6 01 03 13.0 -72 09 18.0 01 01 19.5 -72 11 22 -- -- -- -- 00 54 55.6 -72 45 10.0 52167.4 ± 8.0 00 57 36.2 -72 19 34.0 52219.0 ± 13.7 265.3 ± 2.9 151.8 ± 1.0 700.5 01 02 06.69 -71 41 15.8 00 55 17.9 -72 38 53.0 -- -- -- -- SXP304 SXP323 SXP348 SXP452 SXP504 SXP565 SXP700 SXP701 SXP756 696.37 755.50 00 49 42.42 -73 23 15.9 52196.1 ± 3.9 389.9 ± 7.0 SXP1323 1323.20 01 03 37.5 -72 01 33.2 -- -- aFrom radio observations (Kaspi et al. 1993). bFrom OGLE III data (Schmidtke et al. 2006). cFrom MACHO data of the possible optical counterpart (Coe et al. 2005). dFrom OGLE and MACHO data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2007). eFrom MACHO data (Cowley & Schmidtke 2004). f From MACHO data (Coe et al. 2005). gFrom OGLE data (Edge 2005d). hFrom OGLE and MACHO data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2006). iFrom OGLE data (Schmidtke et al. 2004). jFrom OGLE and MACHO data (Edge 2005d). kFrom RXTE data (Corbet et al. 2004d). lFrom OGLE data (Schmidtke et al. 2007). mFrom OGLE and MACHO data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2005b). nFrom MACHO data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2007b). oFrom OGLE data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2005b; Edge 2005d). pFrom OGLE data (Edge 2006, private communication). qFrom MACHO data (Schmidtke et al. 2004). rFrom OGLE and MACHO data (McGowan et al. 2007; Schmidtke & Cowley 2007b). sFrom MACHO data (Edge 2005d). tFrom MACHO data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2006). uFrom OGLE data (Schmidtke et al. 2006). vFrom OGLE data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2006). wFrom OGLE data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2005b). xFrom OGLE and MACHO data (Schmidtke et al. 2004). -- 81 -- yFrom OGLE and MACHO data (Edge et al. 2005c). zFrom OGLE data (McGowan et al. 2007). aaFrom MACHO data (Schmidtke & Cowley 2005b). abFrom MACHO data (Cowley & Schmidtke 2003; Schmidtke et al. 2004). -- 82 -- We thank A. Cowley for pointing out some glaring omissions in the final manuscript and also the anonymous referee for many useful comments that made this paper clearer. Facilities: RXTE (PCA). A. Determining signal significance Scargle (1982) proposes the normalisation of the periodogram to the variance, σ2 n, of the signal-free data, where σn is the standard deviation; as such, Gaussian noise will have a power of 14. Furthermore, the probability function Prob associated with the periodogram will be exponentially distributed5, and it can be shown that the probability that a periodic signal with power of Z is due to noise is FAP = 1 − (1 − e−Z)M (A1) which is the False Alarm Probability, with M being the number of independent frequencies, which we (rather conservatively) define as M = 2 × nf × ∆f × τ (A2) where nf is the number of scanned frequencies, ∆f is the frequency interval used when calculating the periodogram, and τ is the duration of the observation. A more useful number may be the significance of a detection, or how sure we are that it is real; this is simply 1 − FAP, expressed as a percentage. This is the value that will be used throughout this paper to estimate the importance and believability of a signal, and is given by Sig(%) = 100 × (1 − e−Z)M (A3) 4It is clear that most of the data from observations made by RXTE during the survey contain contributions from a number of sources in the field of view, and their variance should not be used in the calculations. However, after analysing a large number of observations, it was found that the average power within the calculated power spectra was essentially 1 (likely due to the low S/N), which justifies our use of the light curve variance (including all the pulsar signals) instead of the variance of the noise, which would have been difficult to obtain. 5It will be of the form Prob = e−Z, which is the probability of detecting a peak in the periodogram above a certain power, Z. -- 83 -- In the Lomb-Scargle periodogram, the peak-to-trough amplitude A of the modulation in the signal is related to the power PLS through A = 4rPLS σ2 N n (A4) where N is the number of data points (Scargle 1982). If the signal detected has any harmonics, its total power will be divided between the individual harmonic peaks in the power spectrum. Using only the fundamental to estimate the amplitude of the signal's pulsations could then severely underestimate it if there were considerable power in any of the harmonics (which is often the case). If the amplitude of all the harmonics is known, it can be shown that the total amplitude of the signal will be given by Atotal =sXi A2 i (A5) From the error in the angular frequency detected at a certain power in the Lomb-Scargle periodogram (Horne & Baliunas 1986), we derive the error on the period as dP = 3 4(cid:18) P 2 σn√N τ A(cid:19) (A6) where A is the Lomb-Scargle amplitude given by Eq. (A5), and σn is the standard deviation of the noise, although the standard deviation of the actual data is used, as explained earlier. Apart from the global significance of a detection, we define an additional quantity, the local significance, as the significance of a peak at frequency f , within a region of frequency space extending 5% of f to either side of it. B. Luminosity and magnetic field estimation If all the matter accreting onto a neutron star is converted into energy, the luminosity that will result is simply the gravitational energy lost by the in-falling mass (Frank et al. 2002): -- 84 -- Lx = GM M R (B1) where M is the mass transfer rate. Some manipulation and substitution can provide a more manageable expression: Lx37 = 8.4 × 109 Mn M Rn ! (B2) which will give us the luminosity in terms of 1037 erg s−1, and where Mn is the mass of the M is the mass accretion rate in units of M ⊙ yr−1, and Rn is neutron star in units of M ⊙, the radius of the neutron star in km. The angular momentum of a neutron star is given by where P s is the spin period, and the moment of inertia is given by Ln = 2πIn Ps In = 2 5 MnR2 n with Mn and Rn being the mass and radius of the neutron star in standard units. The torque experienced by a neutron star spinning up or down is given by (B3) (B4) (B5) = 2πIn Ps P 2 s τ ≡(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) dLn dt (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) with P s being the rate of change of the spin period (Frank et al. 2002). For an accreting pulsar undergoing steady spin up/down, the applied torque will depend M , and the angular momentum of matter in the accretion disc on the mass accretion rate, at the magnetospheric radius, rm. This torque is given by τ = MpGMnrm (B6) -- 85 -- The maximum torque possible will occur when rm = rco, where the corotation radius6 is given by 1 3 rco =(cid:18)GMnP 2 4π2 (cid:19) s (B7) Substituting this value in Eq. (B6) will provide the expression for the maximum torque possible: τmax = M(cid:20) G2M 2 2π nPs 1 3 (cid:21) (B8) Clearly, τ ≤ τmax, so using Eqs. B5 and B8, and substituting the expression for the moment of inertia from Eq. (B4), we find the accretion rate will be M ≥ 2 5 R2 n 1 3 Ps(cid:20) 16π4Mn s G2 (cid:21) P 7 kg s−1 (B9) substituting this value in Eq. (B1) we finally obtain the lower limit on the luminosity that will be produced through accretion: Lx37 ≥ 2Rn Ps 5 × 1030 (cid:20)16π4GM 4 P 7 s n 1 3 (cid:21) (B10) which will be in units of 1037 erg s−1 if S.I. units are used (and the neutron star mass is in M ⊙). This equation will allow the estimation of the luminosity associated with an outburst if the average spin up/down is measured. One further value that can be estimated is the magnetic field of the neutron star. Rearranging Eq. (6.24) of Frank et al. (2002), and using the period in place of the frequency, a constraint can be placed on its value: B12 ≤(cid:20)3.4 × 10−4 R−2 n M −10 7 n L 6 7 x37 −7 2 P 2 s Ps (cid:21) (B11) 6The corotation radius is defined as the radius at which matter in the disc is moving at the same speed as the neutron star's surface. -- 86 -- where the magnetic field will be in units of 1012 G if Mn is in M ⊙ and Rn in metres. In the present work we assume values for the neutron star's radius and mass of Rn = 104 m and Mn = 1.4 M⊙, respectively. REFERENCES Ables J. G., Jacka C. E., Hall P. J., Hamilton P. A., McConnell D., McCulloch P. M., 1987, IAU Circ., 4422, 1 Bell J. F., 1994, Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 11, 81 Blackburn J. K., 1995, in Shaw R. A., Payne H. E., Hayes J. J. E., eds, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV Vol. 77 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, FTOOLS: A FITS Data Processing and Analysis Software Package. pp 367 -- + Buckley D. A. H., Coe M. J., Stevens J. B., van der Heyden K., Angelini L., White N., Giommi P., 2001, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 320, 281 Carstairs I. R., 1992, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton Chakrabarty D., Levine A., Clark G., Takeshima T., Wilson C., Finger M., 1998, IAU Circ., 7048, 1 Charles P. A., Southwell K. A., O'Donoghue D., 1996, IAU Circ., 6305, 2 Clark G., Doxsey R., Li F., Jernigan J. G., van Paradijs J., 1978, Astrophys. J., Lett., 221, L37 Clark G., Remillard R., Woo J., 1996, IAU Circ., 6282, 1 Clark G. W., Remillard R. A., Woo J. W., 1997, Astrophys. J., Lett., 474, L111+ Coe M. J., Edge W. R. T., Galache J. L., McBride V. A., 2005, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 356, 502 Coe M. J., Haigh N. J., Laycock S. G. T., Negueruela I., Kaiser C. R., 2002, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 332, 473 Coe M. J., Stevens J. B., Buckley D. A. H., Charles P. A., Southwell K. A., 1998, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 293, 43 -- 87 -- Corbet R. H. D., 1984, Astron. Astrophys., 141, 91 Corbet R., Marshall F. E., Lochner J. C., Ozaki M., Ueda Y., 1998, IAU Circ., 6803, 1 Corbet R. H. D., Marshall F. E., Coe M. J., Laycock S., Handler G., 2001, Astrophys. J., Lett., 548, L41 Corbet R., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., Laycock S., Coe M., 2002, IAU Circ., 7932, 2 Corbet R., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., Coe M. J., Edge W. R. T., Laycock S., 2003a, IAU Circ., 8064, 4 Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., Coe M. J., Edge W. R. T., Laycock S., 2003b, The Astronomer's Telegram, 163, 1 Corbet R. H. D., Edge W. R. T., Laycock S., Coe M. J., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., 2003c, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, 7, 1 Corbet R. H. D., Laycock S., Marshall F. E., Markwardt C. B., Coe M. J., 2003d, The Astronomer's Telegram, 209, 1 Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Coe M. J., Edge W. R. T., Laycock S., Marshall F. E., 2003e, The Astronomer's Telegram, 214, 1 Corbet R. H. D., Coe M. J., Edge W. R. T., Laycock S., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., 2004a, The Astronomer's Telegram, 277, 1 Corbet R. H. D., Laycock S., Coe M. J., Marshall F. E., Markwardt C. B., 2004b, in AIP Conf. Proc. 714: X-ray Timing 2003: Rossi and Beyond Monitoring and Discovering X-ray Pulsars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. pp 337 -- 341 Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Coe M. J., Edge W. R. T., Laycock S., Marshall F. E., 2004c, The Astronomer's Telegram, 273, 1 Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., Coe M. J., Edge W. R. T., Galache J. L., Laycock S., 2004d, The Astronomer's Telegram, 347, 1 Cowley A. P., Schmidtke P. C., 2003, Astrophys. J., 126, 2949 Cowley A. P., Schmidtke P. C., 2004, Astrophys. J., 128, 709 Cowley A. P., Schmidtke P. C., McGrath T. K., Ponder A. L., Fertig M. R., Hutchings J. B., Crampton D., 1997, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 109, 21 -- 88 -- de Jager O. C., Raubenheimer B. C., North A. R., Nel H. I., van Urk G., 1988, Astrophys. J., 329, 831 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., 2003, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 338, 428 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Laycock S., 2004a, The Astronomer's Telegram, 225, 1 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Laycock S., Marshall F. E., 2004b, The Astronomer's Telegram, 216, 1 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., Galache J. L., McBride V. A., Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Laycock S., 2004c, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 353, 1286 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., McBride V. A., 2004d, The Astronomer's Telegram, 217, 1 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., Galache J. L., 2005a, The Astronomer's Telegram, 405, 1 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., Galache J. L., McBride V. A., Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Laycock S., Marshall F. E., 2005b, The Astronomer's Telegram, 426, 1 Edge W. R. T., Coe M. J., Galache J. L., McBride V. A., Corbet R. H. D., Okazaki A. T., Laycock S., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., Udalski A., 2005c, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 361, 743 Edge W. R. T., 2005d, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton Fabrycky D., 2005, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 359, 117 Filipovi´c M. D., Haberl F., Pietsch W., Morgan D. H., 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 353, 129 Frank J., King A., Raine D. J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition. Cambridge University Press Galache J. L., Corbet R. H. D., Coe M. J., Laycock S., Markwardt C. B., Marshall F. E., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 674, 1 Grimm H.-J., Gilfanov M., Sunyaev R., 2003, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 339, 793 Haberl F., Filipovi´c M. D., Pietsch W., Kahabka P., 2000, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser., 142, 41 Haberl F., Pietsch W., 2004, Astron. Astrophys., 414, 667 -- 89 -- Haberl F., Pietsch W., Kahabka P., 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram, 1095, 1 Haberl F., Pietsch W., 2005, Astron. Astrophys., 438, 211 Haberl F., Pietsch W., Schartel N., Rodriguez P., Corbet R. H. D., 2004, The Astronomer's Telegram, 219, 1 Haberl F., Sasaki M., 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 359, 573 Horne J. H., Baliunas S. L., 1986, Astrophys. J., 302, 757 Hughes J. P., 1994, Astrophys. J., Lett., 427, L25 Imanishi K., Yokogawa J., Koyama K., 1998, IAU Circ., 7040, 2 Israel G. L., Campana S., Covino S., Dal Fiume D., Gaetz T. J., Mereghetti S., Oosterbroek T., Orlandini M., Parmar A. N., Ricci D., Stella L., 2000, Astrophys. J., Lett., 531, L131 Israel G. L., Stella L., Angelini L., White N. E., Giommi P., Covino S., 1997, Astrophys. J., Lett., 484, L141+ Israel G. L., Stella L., Campana S., Covino S., Ricci D., Oosterbroek T., 1998, IAU Circ., 6999, 1 Jahoda K., Markwardt C. B., Radeva Y., Rots A., Stark M. J., Swank J. H., Strohmayer T. E., Zhang W., 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0511531 Jahoda K., Swank J. H., Giles A. B., Stark M. J., Strohmayer T., Zhang W., Morgan E. H., 1996, in Proc. SPIE Vol. 2808, p. 59-70, EUV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Instrumen- tation for Astronomy VII, Oswald H. Siegmund; Mark A. Gummin; Eds. In-orbit performance and calibration of the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) Propor- tional Counter Array (PCA). pp 59 -- 70 Kahabka P., Pietsch W., 1998, IAU Circ., 6840, 1 Kaspi V. M., Johnston S., Manchester R. N., Bailes M., Bell J. F., Bessell M., Lyne A. G., D'Amico N., 1993, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 25, 1434 Lamb R. C., Fox D. W., Macomb D. J., Prince T. A., 2002, Astrophys. J., Lett., 574, L29 Lamb R. C., Macomb D. J., Prince T. A., Majid W. A., 2002, Astrophys. J., Lett., 567, L129 Lamb R. C., Prince T. A., Macomb D. J., Finger M. H., 1999, IAU Circ., 7081, 4 -- 90 -- Laycock S., Corbet R. H. D., Coe M. J., Marshall F. E., Markwardt C., Edge W., 2003, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 339, 435 Laycock S., Corbet R. H. D., Coe M. J., Marshall F. E., Markwardt C., Lochner J., 2005, Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., 161, 96 Laycock S., Corbet R. H. D., Perrodin D., Coe M. J., Marshall F. E., Markwardt C., 2002, Astron. Astrophys., 385, 464 Laycock S. G. T., 2002, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton Lochner J. C., Marshall F. E., Whitlock L. A., Brandt N., 1998, IAU Circ., 6814, 1 Lochner J. C., Whitlock L. A., Corbet R. H. D., Marshall F. E., 1999a, American Astro- nomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 194th Meeting Lochner J. C., Whitlock L. A., Corbet R. H. D., Marshall F. E., 1999b, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 31, 742 Lomb N. R., 1976, Astrophys. Space. Sci., 39, 447 Macomb D. J., Finger M. H., Harmon B. A., Lamb R. C., Prince T. A., 1999, Astrophys. J., Lett., 518, L99 Macomb D. J., Fox D. W., Lamb R. C., Prince T. A., 2003, Astrophys. J., Lett., 584, L79 Maeder A., Grebel E. K., Mermilliod J.-C., 1999, Astron. Astrophys., 346, 459 Majid W. A., Lamb R. C., Macomb D. J., 2004, Astrophys. J., 609, 133 Marshall F. E., Lochner J. C., Santangelo A., Cusumano G., Israel G. L., dal Fiume D., Orlandini M., Frontera F., Parmar A. N., Corbet R. H. D., 1998, IAU Circ., 6818, 1 Marshall F. E., Lochner J. C., Takeshima T., 1997, IAU Circ., 6777, 2 McGowan K. E., Coe M. J., Schurch M., McBride V. A., Galache J. L., Edge W. R. T., Corbet R. H. D., Laycock S., Udalski U., Buckley D. A. H., 2007, to appear in Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Press W. H., Rybicki G. B., 1989, Astrophys. J., 338, 277 Sasaki M., Haberl F., Keller S., Pietsch W., 2001, Astron. Astrophys., 369, L29 Sasaki M., Pietsch W., Haberl F., 2003, Astron. Astrophys., 403, 901 -- 91 -- Scargle J. D., 1982, Astrophys. J., 263, 835 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., Levenson L., Sweet K., 2004, Astron. J., 127, 3388 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., 2005a, The Astronomer's Telegram, 648, 1 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., 2005b, Astron. J., 130, 2220 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., 2006, Astron. J., 132, 919 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., Udalski A., 2006, Astron. J., 132, 971 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram, 1181, 1 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., 2007, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 211, #03.06 Schmidtke P. C., Cowley A. P., Udalski A., 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram, 1316, 1 Southwell K. A., Charles P. A., 1996, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 281, L63 Stanimirovic S., Staveley-Smith L., Dickey J. M., Sault R. J., Snowden S. L., 1999, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 302, 417 Stella L., White N. E., Rosner R., 1986, Astrophys. J., 308, 669 Stevens J. B., Coe M. J., Buckley D. A. H., 1999, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 309, 421 Torii K., Yokogawa J., Imanishi K., Koyama K., 2000, IAU Circ., 7428, 3 Tsujimoto M., Imanishi K., Yokogawa J., Koyama K., 1999, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 51, L21 Ueno M., Yamaguchi H., Takagi S.-I., Yokogawa J., Koyama K., 2004, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 56, 175 Wilson C., Finger M., 1998, IAU Circ., 7048, 1 Wilson C. A., Finger M. H., Coe M. J., Negueruela I., 2003, Astrophys. J., 584, 996 Yokogawa J., Imanishi K., Koyama K., Nishiuchi M., Mizuno N., 2002, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 54, 53 Yokogawa J., Imanishi K., Tsujimoto M., Koyama K., Nishiuchi M., 2003, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 55, 161 -- 92 -- Yokogawa J., Imanishi K., Ueno M., Koyama K., 2000, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 52, L73 Yokogawa J., Torii K., Imanishi K., Koyama K., 2000, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 52, L37 Yokogawa J., Koyama K., 1998a, IAU Circ., 6853, 2 Yokogawa J., Koyama K., 1998b, IAU Circ., 7009, 3 Yokogawa J., Koyama K., 1998c, IAU Circ., 7028, 1 Yokogawa J., Torii K., Kohmura T., Imanishi K., Koyama K., 2000, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 52, L53 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
0802.0151	1	0802	2008-02-01T16:07:11	Boxy/peanut and discy bulges : formation, evolution and properties	[ "astro-ph" ]	The class `bulges' contains objects with very different formation and evolution paths and very different properties. I review two types of `bulges', the boxy/peanut bulges (B/Ps) and the discy bulges. The former are parts of bars seen edge-on, have their origin in vertical instabilities of the disc and are somewhat shorter in extent than bars. Their stellar population is similar to that of the inner part of the disc from which they formed. Discy bulges have a disc-like outline, i.e., seen face-on they are circular or oval and seen edge-on they are thin. Their extent is of the order of 5 times smaller than that of the boxy/peanut bulges. They form from the inflow of mainly gaseous material to the centre of the galaxy and from subsequent star formation. They thus contain a lot of young stars and gas. Bulges of different types often coexist in the same galaxy. I review the main known results on these two types of bulges and present new simulation results. B/Ps form about 1Gyr after the bar, via a vertical buckling. At that time the bar strength decreases, its inner part becomes thicker -- forming the peanut or boxy shape -- and the ratio $\sigma_z^2/\sigma_r^2$ increases. A second buckling episode is seen in simulations with strong bars, also accompanied by a thickening of the peanut and a weakening of the bar. The properties of the B/Ps correlate strongly with those of the bar: stronger bars have stronger peanuts, a more flat-topped vertical density distribution and have experienced more bucklings. I also present simulations of disc galaxy formation, which include the formation of a discy bulge. Decomposition of their radial density profile into an exponential disc and a Sersic bulge gives realistic values for the disc and bulge scale-lengths and mass ratios, and a Sersic shape index of the order of 1.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Proceedings Title IAU Symposium Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 245, 2008 A.C. Editor, B.D. Editor & C.E. Editor, eds. c(cid:13) 2008 International Astronomical Union DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X Boxy/peanut and discy bulges : formation, evolution and properties E. Athanassoula Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, Observatoire Astronomique de Marseille Provence, 2 place Le Verrier, 13248 Marseille cedex 04, France Abstract. The class 'bulges' contains objects with very different formation and evolution paths and very different properties. I review two types of 'bulges', the boxy/peanut bulges (B/Ps) and the discy bulges. The former are parts of bars seen edge-on, have their origin in vertical instabilities of the disc and are somewhat shorter in extent than bars. Their stellar population is similar to that of the inner part of the disc from which they formed. Discy bulges have a disc-like outline, i.e., seen face-on they are circular or oval and seen edge-on they are thin. Their extent is of the order of 5 times smaller than that of the boxy/peanut bulges. They form from the inflow of mainly gaseous material to the centre of the galaxy and from subsequent star formation. They thus contain a lot of young stars and gas. Bulges of different types often coexist in the same galaxy. I review the main known results on these two types of bulges and present new simulation results. z/σ2 B/Ps form about 1Gyr after the bar, via a vertical buckling. At that time the bar strength decreases, its inner part becomes thicker -- forming the peanut or boxy shape -- and the ratio σ2 r increases. A second buckling episode is seen in simulations with strong bars, also accom- panied by a thickening of the peanut and a weakening of the bar. The properties of the B/Ps correlate strongly with those of the bar: stronger bars have stronger peanuts, a more flat-topped vertical density distribution and have experienced more bucklings. I also present simulations of disc galaxy formation, which include the formation of a discy bulge. Decomposition of their radial density profile into an exponential disc and a S´ersic bulge gives realistic values for the disc and bulge scale-lengths and mass ratios, and a S´ersic shape index of the order of 1. It is thus clear that classical bulges, B/P bulges and discy bulges are three distinct classes of objects and that lumping them together can lead to confusion. To avoid this, the two latter could be called B/P features and inner discs, respectively. Keywords. galaxies: bulges, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, stellar dynamics, methods: N-body simulations 1. Introduction What is a bulge? Three different definitions have been used so far, based on morphol- ogy, photometry, or kinematics, respectively. According to the morphological definition, a bulge is the component of a disc galaxy that swells out of the central part of a disc viewed edge-on. Based on photometry, a bulge is the extra light in the central part of the galaxy, over and above the exponential profile fitting the remaining (non central) part of the disc. The third definition is based on kinematics, and in particular on the value of V /σ, or, more specifically, on the location of the object on the (V /σ, ellipticity) diagram (often referred to as the Binney diagram (Binney 1978, 2005)). These three definitions are compared and discussed in Athanassoula & Martinez-Valpuesta (2007). The lack of a single, clear-cut definition of a bulge, although historically understand- able, has led to considerable confusion and to the fact that bulges are an inhomoge- neous class of objects. For this reason, Kormendy (1993; see also Kormendy & Kenni- 1 8 0 0 2 b e F 1 ] h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 5 1 0 . 2 0 8 0 : v i X r a 2 E. Athanassoula cutt 2004, hereafter KK04) distinguished classical bulges from pseudo-bulges. However, pseudo-bulges by themselves are also an inhomogeneous class of objects, as argued by Athanassoula (2005a, hereafter A05), who distinguishes three types of objects which are, according to the above definitions, classified as bulges. Classical bulges are formed by gravitational collapse or hierarchical merging of smaller objects and corresponding dissipative gas processes. Their morphological, photometrical and kinematical proper- ties are similar to those of ellipticals. They are discussed extensively in other papers in these proceedings and are not the subject of this review. The two other types of bulges are boxy/peanut bulges (B/P), and discy bulges, which will be discussed here. As stressed in A05, different types of bulges often co-exist and it is possible to find all three types of bulges in the same simulation, or in the same galaxy. 2. Boxy/peanut bulges Viewed edge-on, disc galaxies often have a central component which swells out of the disc and whose outline is not elliptical, but has a boxy, or peanut, or even 'X' shape. Due to the morphological definition of a bulge, such components have been called bulges, or, more specifically, boxy/peanut bulges (B/Ps). The formation of B/Ps has been witnessed in a large number of numerical simulations (Combes & Sanders 1981; Combes et al. 1990; Raha et al. 1991; Athanassoula & Misiriotis 2002, hereafter AM02; Athanassoula 2003, hereafter A03; A05; O'Neil & Dubinski 2003; Debattista et al. 2004; Martinez-Valpuesta & Shlosman 2004; Debattista et al. 2006; Martinez-Valpuesta, Shlosman & Heller 2006, etc). It is linked to the vertical instability of parts of the main family of periodic orbits constituting the bar, widely known as the x1 family (Binney 1981; Pfenniger 1984; Skokos, Patsis & Athanassoula 2002; Patsis, Skokos & Athanassoula 2002). The stability of the x1 family can be followed from the corresponding stability diagram (see e.g. figures 3 and 4 of Skokos et al. 2002) which shows that, at the positions where the x1 becomes unstable, other families bifurcate. These are linked to the n : 1 vertical resonances and extend well outside the disc equatorial plane. As shown by Patsis et al. (2002), some of them are very good building blocks for the formation of peanuts, because they are stable and because their orbits have the right shape, extent and location. Studies of these orbits reproduced many of the B/P properties and helped explaining crucial aspects of B/P formation and evolution. For example, an analysis of the orbital families that constitute peanuts predicts that B/Ps should be shorter than bars. This is indeed found to be the case both in N -body simulations and in real galaxies (Lutticke, Dettmar & Pohlen 2000; A05; Athanassoula & Beaton 2006). 2.1. Time evolution The time evolution of the bar, of the buckling and of the peanut strengths are plotted in Fig. 1 for a simulation which develops a strong bar. The time is given in Gyrs, using the calibration proposed in AM02. The initially unbarred disc forms a bar roughly between times 3 and 4 Gyrs (lower panel). I define as bar formation time the time at which the bar-growth is maximum (i.e. when the slope of the bar strength as a function of time is maximum) and indicate it by the first vertical line in Fig. 1. The bar strength reaches a maximum at a time indicated by the second vertical line, and then decreases considerably over ∼ 1 Gyr. The time at which the bar amplitude decrease is maximum is given by the third vertical line. Subsequently, the bar strength reaches a minimum, at a time shown by the fourth vertical line, and then starts increasing again at a rate much slower than that during bar formation. The upper panel shows the buckling strength, i.e. the vertical asymmetry as a function Boxy/peanut and discy bulges : formation, evolution and properties 3 Figure 1. Time evolution of three peanut-, or bar-related quantities, namely the buckling strength (i.e. the vertical asymmetry; upper panel), the peanut strength (i.e. its vertical extent; middle panel) and the bar strength (lower panel). The solid vertical lines mark characteristic times linked to bar formation and evolution. From left to right, these are the bar formation time, the maximum amplitude time, the bar decay time and the bar minimum amplitude time (see text). The vertical dashed line marks the time of the buckling. of time. The disc is vertically symmetric before and during bar formation and the first indications of asymmetry occur only after the bar amplitude has reached a maximum. The asymmetry then grows very abruptly to a strong, clear peak and then drops equally abruptly. The time of the buckling (dashed vertical line) is given by the peak of this curve and is very clearly defined. It is important to note that, to within the measuring errors, it coincides with the time of bar decay (third vertical line). This is not accidental. I verified it for a very large number of simulations and thus can establish the link between the buckling episode and the decay of the bar strength (Raha et al. 1991; Martinez- Valpuesta & Shlosman 2004). The middle panel shows the strength of the peanut, i.e. its vertical extent, again as a function of time. This quantity grows abruptly after the bar has reached its maximum amplitude and during the time of the buckling. This abrupt growth is followed by a much slower increase over a longer period of time. Taken together, the three panels of Fig. 1 show that the bar forms vertically thin, and only after it has reached a maximum strength does the buckling phase occur. During the buckling time the bar strength decreases significantly, while the the B/P strength increases. The time intervals during which bar formation, peanut formation, or buckling occur are all three rather short, of the order of a Gyr, and they are followed by a longer stretch of time during which the bar and B/P evolve much slower. This later evolution is often referred to as secular evolution. 4 E. Athanassoula This particular simulation has a second, weaker buckling episode shortly after 8 Gyrs. This occurs very often in simulations developing strong bars and was discussed first by Athanassoula (2005b) and Martinez-Valpuesta et al. (2006). It is seen clearly in all three panels and has characteristics similar to those of the first buckling. 2.2. Peanut formation and collective effects As already discussed, orbital structure theory explains B/P formation by the vertical instabilities of the main family of bar-supporting periodic orbits. An alternative approach explains the buckling and the peanut formation as due to the bending, or fire-hose, instability, studied analytically in the linear regime (Toomre 1966; Araki 1985). These studies assign a critical value to the ratio Rσ = σ2 r igniting the onset of the instability, which is around 0.1. A number of simulations, however, have shown that the vertical instability sets in at much larger values of Rσ (e.g. Merritt & Sellwood 1994; Sotnikova & Rodionov 2003). z /σ2 Figure 2. Time evolution of the ratio Rσ = σ2 r . The thin vertical lines mark two character- istic times linked to bar formation and evolution. From left to right, these are the bar maximum and minimum amplitude times, corresponding to the first buckling episode (see Sect. 2.1 and Fig. 1). z/σ2 To test this hypothesis, I calculate the radial and z components of the disc velocity dispersion as a function of radius (averaging over azimuth and height). I then find the minimum value of their ratio Rσ and plot its time evolution in Fig. 2. The thin vertical lines mark two characteristic times linked to bar formation and evolution -- namely the bar maximum and minimum amplitude times -- as found from Fig. 1. Their location is clearly linked to changes in behaviour of Rσ. This, however, does not necessarily imply that the changes in Rσ are the cause of the buckling, but can also be seen as its consequence. Indeed, as the bar forms σr increases drastically, so that Rσ decreases. Then the bar amplitude reaches its maximum and starts decreasing, while the peanut starts forming. During this time, σr decreases while σz increases. As a result, the ratio Rσ reaches a minimum when the bar amplitude is maximum and then increases again, as is indeed seen in Fig. 2. Then the bar amplitude reaches a minimum, which corresponds to a minimum of σr and therefore to a maximum of Rσ. This is followed by a slower decrease of Rσ, which is stopped by the second buckling episode. The value of Rσ at which this instability sets in is much less extreme than that predicted by the above mentioned analytical works, but is in good agreement with other N -body simulations. More work is necessary before we fully understand the respective roles of the orbital structure results and of the velocity anisotropy effects on the formation and evolution of B/P structures. Both explain part of the story, but many aspects of their interplay are still unclear. Orbital structure results tell us whether the appropriate building blocks are available, or not, and this is essential, since the lack of such building blocks prohibits the Boxy/peanut and discy bulges : formation, evolution and properties 5 formation of a given structure. Furthermore, studies of the properties of the building- block orbits are essential for understanding the properties of the B/P structures. Orbital structure theory, however, can not tell us how much matter is trapped around a given orbit or family. Furthermore, it is necessary to group all these building blocks into one co- herent, self-consistent unit and here collective effects are essential. Like orbital structure, they also can set limits on the formation of B/P structures, as well as give information on their properties. The respective input from the two methods will be discussed further elsewhere. 2.3. Comparison with observations The fact that B/Ps are just parts of bars seen edge-on was not immediately accepted (see e.g. Kormendy 1993). The main arguments against it were, however, refuted in A05, with the help of orbital structure results. Furthermore, considerable observational evidence argues in its favour, particularly detailed comparisons between observations and simulations. Radial density profiles from simulations, taken along slits on, or parallel to, the equa- torial plane when the galaxy is seen edge-on (AM02; A05) have the same characteristic signatures as the corresponding radial light profiles (Lutticke, Dettmar & Pohlen 2000; Bureau et al. 2006). Similarly, density profiles along cuts perpendicular to the equato- rial plane (AM02; A05) show similar characteristics to analogous observed light profiles (Aronica et al. 2003 and this volume). Further tests come from comparisons of median filtered images of B/P systems (Bureau et al. 2006) to similar images of N -body bars (A05). These show the same types of characteristic features, namely four extensions out of the equatorial plane, which form an X-like shape, except that the four extensions do not necessarily cross the centre. Another common feature is maxima of the density along the equatorial plane, away from the centre and diametrically opposite. Starting from the centre of the galaxy and going outwards along the equatorial plane, the projected surface density first drops, then increases again to reach a local maximum and then decreases again to the edge of the disc. Considerable evidence was also accumulated using kinematical observations. Cylindri- cal rotation, witnessed in a number of B/P galaxies (KK04 and references therein), is also seen in velocity fields of strong N -body bars viewed edge-on (Combes et al. 1990; AM02). Emission line spectroscopy of boxy/peanut galaxies (Kuijken & Merrifield 1995; Bureau & Freeman1999; Merrifield & Kuijken 1999) shows that their major axis posi- tion velocity diagrams (PVDs) have a number of interesting features, well reproduced by gas flow simulations (Athanassoula & Bureau 1999). In particular, the shocks along the leading edges of the bar and the corresponding inflow lead to a characteristic gap in the PVDs, between the signature of the nuclear spiral (whenever existent) and the signature of the disc. Comparison of long-slit absorption line spectra (Chung & Bureau 2004) of galaxies with B/Ps to similar 'observations' of N -body bars viewed edge-on reveals that the two have the same characteristic features (Bureau & Athanassoula 2005). The integrated light along the slit (equivalent to a major-axis light profile) has a quasi-exponential central peak and a plateau at intermediate radii, followed by a steep drop. The rotation curve (V (r)) has a characteristic double hump. The velocity dispersion has a central peak, which in the centre-most part may be rather flat or may even have a central minimum. At intermediate radii there can be a plateau which sometimes ends on either side with a shallow maximum before dropping steeply at larger radii. h3 (i.e. the coefficient of the third order term in a Gauss-Hermite expansion of the line of sight velocity distribution) correlates with V over most of the bar length, contrary to what is expected for a fast 6 E. Athanassoula rotating disc. All these features are spatially correlated and are seen, more or less strongly, both in the observations and in the simulations (Bureau & Athanassoula 2005). 2.4. The effect of the halo Figure 3. Histograms of number of bucklings, bar strength, B/P strength and B/P shape for a sample of fully self-consistent high-resolution simulations. The histograms include simulations with halo cores of all sizes and the hatched areas includes only simulations with small halo cores. In collaboration with Martinez-Valpuesta, I made an extensive statistical study of a few hundred simulations which I had run for different purposes (AM02; A03 etc). We measured the strength of the peanut (from its thickness) and its shape (from the shape of the density profile on cuts perpendicular to the equatorial plane) and found that both correlate well with the bar strength. Thus, stronger bars have stronger peanuts and more flat-topped vertical density profiles. I also find that the type of halo plays a major role in determining the properties of the B/P. Fig. 3 shows histograms of the number of bucklings that have occurred, of the bar strength, of the B/P strength and of the B/P shape, distinguishing between simulations with small halo cores and simulations with large halo cores. The two populations are indeed very different. Simulations with small halo cores have stronger bars, stronger peanuts, more flat-topped vertical density profiles and have experienced more bucklings than simulations with large cores. The few simulations with small cores which have weak bars, weak B/Ps and did not buckle have either a very hot halo or a very hot disc. Simulations with cuspy haloes (not shown here) have yet weaker B/Ps and smaller number of bucklings and will be discussed elsewhere. The above can be explained by the fact that the halo plays a major role in determining the properties of the bar (AM02; A03). Athanassoula (2002, hereafter A02) showed that angular momentum is primarily emitted by near-resonant material in the bar region and absorbed by near-resonant material in the outer disc and, particularly, in the halo, Boxy/peanut and discy bulges : formation, evolution and properties 7 while A03 showed that bars grow stronger when more angular momentum is exchanged within the galaxy. Furthermore, as shown in AM02 and as explained in A02 and A03, the size of the halo core strongly influences the bar evolution. Haloes with a small core have a lot of mass in the inner regions and thus, provided their velocity dispersion is not too high, can provide substantial angular momentum sinks and lead to considerable angular momentum exchange between the near-resonant particles in the bar region and the near-resonant particles in the halo. Such models grow strong bars (long, thin and massive) with rectangular-like isodensities (AM02). Viewed side-on (i.e. edge-on with the line-of-sight along the bar minor axis) they exhibit a strong peanut, or even X-like shape. If, however, the velocity dispersion in the disc and/or halo is too high, the angular momentum exchange is hindered and the bar and peanut will be weak (A03). Haloes with large cores have considerably less material in the inner parts and are thus capable of less angular momentum exchange. Bars grown in such environments are less strong, have elliptical-like isodensities when viewed face-on and boxy-like when viewed side-on. All these considerations explain the results found in Fig. 3, namely the difference between the histograms for simulations with small halo cores and simulations with large halo cores. They also explain the weak bars and B/Ps found in some simulations with small halo cores. 3. Disc-like bulges Disc-like bulges form from inflow of (mainly) gas material to the centre of the galaxy and subsequent star formation. This inflow is due to the torques exerted by a non- axisymmetric component, usually a large-scale bar, as witnessed in hydrodynamic simu- lations (e.g. Athanassoula 1992; Friedli & Benz 1993; Heller & Shlosman 1994; Wada & Habe 1995). The high density of the gas accumulated in the inner regions triggers very strong star formation. Such inflow, however, is also seen in N -body simulations (AM02; Valenzuela & Klypin 2003), which represent the old stellar population. Thus, this inner region is not only a region of increased density for the gas and the young stars, but also for the older stellar populations. This should lead to the formation of an inner, central com- ponent of disc-like shape, whose extent is of the order of a kpc and which is constituted mainly of gas and young stars, but also of older stars. This was named disc-like bulge, or, for short, discy bulge in A05 and is often observed in disc galaxies. Due to its disc-like shape, it often has spirals or inner bars (KK04 and references therein). It stands out very clearly in radial photometric profiles, whose decomposition shows it is well represented by a S´ersic law (S´ersic 1968). Contrary to classical bulges, however, it does not swell out of the galactic plane. This is not the only difference between disc-like and classical bulges. Disc-like bulges have a S´ersic index of the order of 1, i.e. much smaller than the values found for classical bulges (KK04 and references therein). They also have different kinematics, like that of discs, a higher fraction of young stars and a higher gas content. A lot of data on such bulges has been collected over the last few years, but still much work, particularly theoretical, is necessary before we fully understand these objects. In order to describe adequately the formation and evolution of disc-like bulges, simu- lations should include gas, star formation and feedback, all in a realistic way. It would, furthermore, be preferable if they started from cosmological or cosmologically-motivated initial conditions, since the properties of pre-existing discs may influence the proper- ties of the disc-like bulges. I will briefly describe here results from simulations following this outline (Athanassoula, Heller & Shlosman, in preparation). For information on the numerical techniques used in these simulations and an initial discussion of some of the results see Heller, Shlosman & Athanassoula (2007a) and (2007b). 8 E. Athanassoula Figure 4. Properties of a simulated disc-like bulge. Left : Radial projected density profile in arbitrary units. Radii are measured in kpc. The dots give the simulation results and the straight line the fit by an exponential disc and a S´ersic component. Right : Measure of the vertical height of the material near the equatorial plane (see text), as a function of radius, measured in kpc. Several non-axisymmetric components -- such as a triaxial halo, oval disc, inner and outer bar -- form during these simulations. Their interactions give very interesting dy- namical phenomena (Heller et al. 2007a; b), while they induce considerable inflow and gaseous high density inner discs. As in the sketchy outline in the beginning of this sec- tion, the high gas concentration in the central area triggers considerable star formation, resulting in a disc-like central, high-density object, which, seen face-on, is often some- what oval. It has many properties similar to those of discy-bulges. For example, it has, in many cases, sub-structures, like an inner bar. In order to further assess the properties of the disc galaxy formed in these simulations and to better establish the link with disc-like bulges, I chose a characteristic specific snapshot, i.e. a characteristic specific simulation and time, and examine its mass distribution in order to compare best with the observed light distribution in galaxies. An analysis of the kinematics, together with a statistical treatment, including other times and other simulations, will be given elsewhere. The radial projected surface density profile of the snapshot under consideration is given in Fig. 4, together with a fit by an exponential disc and a S´ersic component. Note that the fit is excellent, all the way to the outer parts of the disc, roughly at 10 kpc. In this example, the disc scale-length is ∼2.7 kpc, i.e. very realistic, while the S´ersic index is ∼1, in good agreement with observed discy bulges. Figure 5. Edge-on view of the stellar component of the simulation with a disc and a disc-like bulge. The projected density is given by grey-scale and also by five isocontours whose level is picked so as to show best the features under consideration. Fig. 5 shows the snapshot seen edge-on. The three outer isodensity curves show clearly that the shape and aspect ratio of the disc component is very realistic. The two innermost contours (within 1 kpc) reveal the existence of a small, central, disc-like object, the Boxy/peanut and discy bulges : formation, evolution and properties 9 vertical height of which we need to quantify. Measuring the average thickness would not be useful, since this is due to both the external big disc and the small inner component, so I proceeded differently. I divided the 'stars' in the snapshot into circular annuli, according to their distance from the centre and, in each annulus, sorted them as a function of their distance from the equatorial plane (z). Since, statistically, the 'stars' in the disc-like inner component will have smaller z values than the ones in the outer disc, I plot in Fig. 4 the z component of the 'star' with rank 0.3Nan, where Nan is the total number of 'stars' in the annulus. This shows a deep minimum in the central region, as one would expect due to the existence of an inner disc with a shorter vertical extent than the outer one. It also shows that the region where the inner disc is contributing significantly is of the order of 1 kpc, in good agreement with the radial density profile (Fig. 4). Finally, the aspect ratio of the inner and the outer discs are similar. To summarise, in our fiducial simulation, as well as in several others, we witness inflow of mainly gas material to the central regions and strong subsequent star formation. Thus, an inner disc is formed, composed of both stars and gas. Its radial extent is of the order of a kpc and its vertical extent much smaller than that of the outer disc. This disc can harbour spiral structure, or an inner bar. Its contribution to the radial projected density profile is well fitted by a S´ersic law with S´ersic index ∼1. It is thus very likely that this simulation describes correctly the formation of discy-like bulges in galaxies. 4. Summary and discussion I briefly reviewed the formation, evolution and properties of boxy/peanut bulges and of disc-like bulges. These two types of objects have very different formation and evolutionary histories and very different properties. B/Ps form from vertical instabilities and their building blocks are the 3D families associated with the 3D bifurcations of the x1 family. Discy bulges form from the inflow of (mainly) gas material and from the ensuing enhanced star formation. Thus B/Ps are mainly constituted of inner disc stars, while the discy bulges have a very large contribution from gas and young stars. Since the formation of discy bulges relies on the gas inflow, it is expected that they will be found mainly in late type disc galaxies, as is indeed the case. The face-on extent of the B/Ps is of the order of five times larger than that of the discy bulges and, seen edge-on, they extend well outside the equatorial plane, while the discy bulges are thin. Their kinematics and their contribution to the radial photometric profiles are different from those of discy bulges. Thus, one should clearly distinguish between B/Ps and discy-bulges and not lump together them in a single category. Once this has become clear, one may also wish to revise the existent nomenclature in order to avoid some of the present confusion. Boxy/peanut bulges could be called boxy/peanut features (or structures), or simply peanuts, as proposed in A05. This would make it clearer that they are just a part or a feature of the bar and not an independent entity. Similarly, discy bulges could be simply called inner discs. Then the name 'bulge' would be reserved for classical bulges. This change, however, will also necessitate changing the bulge definitions described in Sect. 1. Acknowledgements I thank my collaborators, A. Bosma, A. Aguerri, C. Heller, I. Martinez-Valpuesta and I. Shlosman, for interesting and fruitful discussions. This work was partially supported by grant ANR-06-BLAN-0172 and by the Gruber foundation. 10 E. Athanassoula References Araki, S. 1985 PhD thesis, MIT Aronica, G., Athanassoula, E., Bureau, M., Bosma, A., Dettmar, R.-J., Vergani, D., Pohlen, M. 2003, Ap&SS, 284, 753 Athanassoula, E. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 345 Athanassoula, E. 2002, ApJL, 569, 83 (A02) Athanassoula, E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179 (A03) Athanassoula, E. 2005a, MNRAS, 358, 1477 (A05) Athanassoula, E. 2005b, in Planetary Nebulae as Astronomical Tools, eds. R. Szczerba, G. Stasi´nska & S. K. G´orny, AIP Conf. Proc. 804, Melville, New York, 333 Athanassoula, E., Beaton, R. L. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1499 Athanassoula, E., Bureau, M. 1999, ApJ, 522, 699 Athanassoula, E., Misiriotis, A. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 35 (AM02) Athanassoula, E., Martinez-Valpuesta 2007, in Pathways through an eclectic Universe, eds. J. H. Knapen, T. J. Mahoney, and A. Vazdekis, ASP Conf. Ser., 2007, in press and astro- ph/0710.1518 Binney, J. 1978, MNRAS, 183, 501 Binney, J. 1981, MNRAS, 196, 455 Binney, J. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 937 Bureau, M., Aronica, G., Athanassoula, E., Dettmar, R.-J., Bosma, A., Freeman, K. C. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 753 Bureau, M., Athanassoula, E. 2005, ApJ, 626, 159 Bureau, M., Freeman, K. C. 1999, AJ, 118, 126 Chung, A., Bureau, M. 2004, AJ, 127, 3192 Combes, F., Sanders, R. H. 1981, A&A, 96, 164 Combes, F., Debbasch, F., Friedli, D., Pfenniger, D. 1990, A&A, 233, 82 Debattista, V. P., Carollo, M., Mayer, L., Moore, B. 2004, ApJ, 604, L93 Debattista, V. P., Carollo, M., Mayer, L. Moore, B., Wadsley, J., Quinn, T. 2006, ApJ, 645, 209 Friedli, D., Benz, W. 1993, A&A, 268, 65 Heller, C. H., Shlosman, I. 1994, ApJ, 424, 84 Heller, C.H., Shlosman, I., Athanassoula, E. 2007a, ApJ, 657, L65 Heller, C.H., Shlosman, I., Athanassoula, E. 2007b, ApJ, in press and astro-ph 0706.3895 Kormendy, J. 1993, in Galactic Bulges, eds. H. Dejonghe and H. J. Habing, Kluwer Academic Publ., IAU Symposium 153, 209 Kormendy, J., Kennicutt, R. C. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 603 (KK04) Kuijken, K., Merrifield, M. R. 1995, ApJ, 443, L13 Lutticke, R., Dettmar, R.-J., Pohlen, M. 2000, A&A, 362, 435 Martinez-Valpuesta, I., Shlosman, I. 2004, ApJ, 613, 29 Martinez-Valpuesta, I., Shlosman, I., Heller, C. 2006, ApJ, 637, 214 Merrifield, M. R., Kuijken, K. 1999, A&A, 345, L47 Merritt, D., Sellwood, J. A. 1994, ApJ, 425, 551 O'Neill, J. K., Dubinski, J. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 251 Patsis, P., Skokos, Ch., Athanassoula, E. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 578 Pfenniger, D. 1984, A&A, 134, 373 Raha, N., Sellwood, J. A., James, R. A., Kahn, F. D. 1991, Nature, 352, 411 S´ersic, J. 1968, Atlas de Galaxias Australes, Obs. Astron. Cordoba Skokos, H., Patsis, P., Athanassoula, E. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 847 Sotnikova, N. Ya., Rodionov, S. A. 2003, AstL, 29, 321 Toomre, A. 1966, Geophys. Fluid Dyn., N66-46, 111 Valenzuela, O., Klypin 2003, MNRAS, 345, 406 Wada, K., Habe, A. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 433
astro-ph/0112505	3	0112	2002-02-25T23:44:05	Coherent Radio Pulses From GEANT Generated Electromagnetic Showers In Ice	[ "astro-ph", "hep-ph" ]	Radio Cherenkov radiation is arguably the most efficient mechanism for detecting showers from ultra-high energy particles of 1 PeV and above. Showers occuring in Antarctic ice should be detectable at distances up to 1 km. We report on electromagnetic shower development in ice using a GEANT Monte Carlo simulation. We have studied energy deposition by shower particles and determined shower parameters for several different media, finding agreement with published results where available. We also report on radio pulse emission from the charged particles in the shower, focusing on coherent emission at the Cherenkov angle. Previous work has focused on frequencies in the 100 MHz to 1 GHz range. Surprisingly, we find that the coherence regime extends up to tens of Ghz. This may have substantial impact on future radio-based neutrino detection experiments as well as any test beam experiment which seeks to measure coherent Cherenkov radiation from an electromagnetic shower. Our study is particularly important for the RICE experiment at the South Pole.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Coherent Radio Pulses From GEANT Generated Electromagnetic Showers In Ice Soebur Razzaque,a Surujhdeo Seunarine,b David Z. Besson,a Douglas W. McKay,a John P. Ralston, a and David Seckel c aDepartment of Physics & Astronomy University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA b Department of Physics University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand c Bartol Research Institute University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA Abstract Radio Cherenkov radiation is arguably the most efficient mechanism for detecting showers from ultra-high energy particles of 1 PeV and above. Showers occuring in Antarctic ice should be detectable at distances up to 1 km. We report on electromag- netic shower development in ice using a GEANT Monte Carlo simulation. We have studied energy deposition by shower particles and determined shower parameters for several different media, finding agreement with published results where available. We also report on radio pulse emission from the charged particles in the shower, focusing on coherent emission at the Cherenkov angle. Previous work has focused on frequen- cies in the 100 MHz to 1 GHz range. Surprisingly, we find that the coherence regime extends up to tens of Ghz. This may have substantial impact on future radio-based neutrino detection experiments as well as any test beam experiment which seeks to measure coherent Cherenkov radiation from an electromagnetic shower. Our study is particularly important for the RICE experiment at the South Pole. Contents 1 Introduction 2 Shower Description 2.1 Energy Loss Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 Longitudinal Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 Lateral Spread . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Shower Simulations 3.1 Radiation Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 4 4 5 6 7 7 8 3.2 Moliere radius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3 Energy Loss in the Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 Critical Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.5 Track Lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.6 Particle yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.7 1-D Model Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4 Shower Fluctuation 4.1 Fit to Simulations 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5 Electromagnetic Pulse Theory 21 5.1 Fraunhoffer Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.2 Parametrization Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.3 Radiated Power and The Form Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6 Electric Field Pulse Calculation 28 6.1 Vector Superposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.2 Phase Coherence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.3 Factorization of the Electric Field, and the Discrete Form Factor . . . . . . 31 6.4 The Discrete Form Factor and the Frequency Spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 6.5 The Analytic Form Factor and the Frequency Spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 6.6 Direct Calculation: Monte Carlo Field Spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 6.7 Related Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 6.8 Angular Pulse Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 7 Summary of Results and Conclusions 39 7.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 1 Introduction Ultra high energy (UHE) neutrinos can travel without scattering over large distances. These may prove to be useful cosmological and astrophysical probes. They also present themselves as candidate high energy particles with which we can test the Standard Model of electro-weak theory beyond the energy regime of current accelerators. In an UHE electron-neutrino charged current interaction, the neutrino gives most (≈ 80%) of its energy to the secondary electron, which can then initiate an electromagnetic cascade or shower. It was predicted that an electromagnetic shower generated by a high energy primary could develop a charge excess which would emit Cherenkov radiation coherently [1]. For ultra high energy primaries the Cherenkov radiation would be coherent in the radio region of the spectrum; this long wavelength radiation might then be detected using radio antennas [2, 3, 4]. Given the small predicted flux of ultra high energy neutrinos [5, 6, 7], a suitable experiment to detect ultra high energy neutrinos using this method requires a large, dense (and radio-transparent) volume. Antarctic ice is suitable for this purpose. A detailed analysis of all aspects of such an experiment was done by Frichter, 2 Ralston and McKay (FRM) [8], using a simulation developed by Zas, Halzen and Stanev (ZHS) [9]. FRM concluded that a modest array of optimally designed antennas could detect many events per year. The sensitivity of radio detection peaks above 1 PeV, which compliments an optical array such as AMANDA [10]. The Radio Ice Cherenkov Experiment (RICE) at the South pole [11] is designed as a prototype detector of ultra high energy neutrinos with energy ≥PeV using this method. One basic requirement for such an experiment is a reliable Monte Carlo simulation of the shower development, Cherenkov radiation, detector, and data acquisition system. One can also test the idea of coherent Cherenkov emission at accelerator facilities by dumping a beam of photons or electrons into a dense target like sand or salt or any other suitable medium. Such tests have begun with experiments at Argonne and SLAC [12]. A Monte Carlo simulation which can be easily adapted to such a test beam experiment, where Fresnel and possibly near zone radiation is important, and one that can include hadron showers conveniently, is clearly desirable. The ZHS simulation, designed for electromag- netic showers and Fraunhoffer (far zone) detection, has been a powerful tool. However an expansion and update with extensive testing, offering applications to test beam and neutrino astronomy, is currently needed. We have written a GEANT-based Monte Carlo simulation to study coherent Cherenkov emission in ice, salt, or a beam dump. GEANT 3.21 [13] is a well known and widely used simulation and detection Monte Carlo package in particle physics1. It allows access to all details of the simulation such as controls of various processes, definition of target and detector media, and a complete history of all events simulated. GEANT can be used to simulate all dominant processes in 10 keV - 10 TeV energy range, although it has not been extensively verified for energies >100 GeV, where the extrapolation of well-known lower- energy electromagnetic cross-sections becomes large, and other effects (LPM, e.g. [14, 15]) become significant. For electron energies above 10 GeV, GEANT uses screened Bethe- Heitler cross-section for bremsstrahlung together with the Migdal corrections [16, 17]. The first Migdal correction is important for energy ≥1 TeV, reducing the cross-section. The second correction reduces the differential cross-section for soft photon emission and is effective even at much lower energies, in the 100 MeV - 1 GeV range. The LPM effect in the context of UHE electromagnetic shower development and radio emission has been discussed in [18, 19, 20]. GEANT is used to simulate electromagnetic showers inside materials from which we extract detailed track information including particle type, coordinates, energy and inter- action time. From this track information, we investigate shower properties like radiation length, Moliere radius, critical energy and energy deposition in the material. We also de- termine the resulting radio pulse using standard electrodynamic calculations from charged particles' tracks and by parametrizing the shower. Ultimately we will consider hadronic shower information and GEANT provides the flexibility to expand our analysis to this case. We note that physics results presented thus far by RICE have neglected the hadronic shower contribution and are, in this respect, conservative. 1Differences between GEANT 3.21 and GEANT 4 are primarily at energies below the threshold for emission of Cherenkov radiation, and therefore do not affect the results presented here. 3 The organization of this report is as follows. In section two, we discuss various aspects of electromagnetic showers and define quantities which characterize the shower. We present results on the shower structure from the Monte Carlo simulation in section three and compare them with established values in standard materials such as iron, lead and carbon. Our analysis includes the detailed breakdown of the radiation-generating charge imbalance into energy bins, the direct evaluation from energy considerations of Moliere radius and the determination from dE/dx of radiation and energy deposition of the critical energy. We discuss shower-to-shower fluctuations by parametrizing the showers in section four. In section five, we review the theory behind coherent emission of an electromagnetic pulse from the shower [21]. In section six, we calculate the electric pulse from the shower using track information from GEANT. We summarize our results in section seven, making a number of comparisons with ZHS, and discuss future work. 2 Shower Description When a high energy electron or photon hits a material target, an electromagnetic shower develops longitudinally inside the material. At the beginning of the shower, bremsstrahlung and pair production are the dominant processes. Due to these processes, the number of particles increases exponentially and the shower is created. Due to the dominance of bremsstrahlung as the primary energy loss mechanism for high energy electrons, the population of photons quickly dominates that of electrons or positrons. The energy of the initial particle is divided among the secondaries. The exponential production of particles is halted when the charged particles reach the critical energy (Ec). This is the transition region where ionization loss overtakes radiation loss as the most important electron energy loss mechanism. The particle population also reaches its maximum ("shower max") at this point. After reaching the critical energy, charged particles lose their energy predominantly inelastically by ionization, resulting in a subsequent decline in the number of particles in the shower as they degrade in energy and range out in the medium. Multiple Coulomb scattering is responsible for the transverse spread of the shower. The shower core is populated by the highest energy particles. There is a long tail composed mostly of the coulomb- scattered low-energy component. Other processes - Compton, Moller and Bhabha and positron annihilation build up a net charge (more electrons than positrons) in the shower as atomic electrons in the target medium are swept up into the forward moving shower. 2.1 Energy Loss Mechanisms Energy loss of an electron due to radiation is well approximated by the Bethe-Heitler formula [22] −(cid:18) dE dx(cid:19)rad = E 4NoZ 2r2 e 137A ln(cid:18) 183 Z 1/3(cid:19) (1) where E is the initial energy of the electron, x is the distance in g-cm−2 units, No is Avogadro's number, A is the mass number of the nuclei of the medium, Z is the atomic 4 number of the medium and r2 e = e4/m2c4 is the classical electron radius. For a composite medium like ice (H2O), one has to calculate the effective Z and A using the proportion by weight method2. The Bethe-Bloch formula [23, 24] gives the energy loss due to ionization as −(cid:18) dE dx(cid:19)ion = 4πNo Z A r2 e mc2"ln 2mv2γ2 I ! − 1 − δ 2# (2) where I = 10 Z eV and γ is the Lorentz factor in usual relativistic notation. At very high energy, one needs to take into account the density effect as the medium becomes polarized. This is taken care of by the following term inside the square bracket of Eq. (2): where ωp is the plasma frequency of the medium. δ/2 = ln(¯hωp/I) + lnβγ − 1/2, (3) A rough expression for the critical energy, Ec, can be found by the ratio of the expres- sions for radiation and ionization losses. The log term in Eq. (1) is roughly 4 and the square bracket term in equation (2) is approximately 11 if we include polarization effects. The ratio is then Ec ≈ 605 Z MeV. (4) An alternate definition of the critical energy is that of Rossi [25], according to which, the critical energy (Ec) is the energy at which the ionization loss per radiation length is equal to the electron energy. Critical energies determined from these two definitions are compared in a subsequent section. The radiation length (Xo) is given by 1 Xo = 4NoZ 2r2 e 137A ln (cid:18) 183 Z 1/3(cid:19) (5) so that the approximate expression for radiation loss (Eq. E/Xo or < E >= Eoe−x/Xo. (1)) becomes −(dE/dx) = (6) Eq. (6) serves as a definition of the radiation length; Xo is the thickness of material needed to reduce the mean energy of an electron to 1/e of its original through bremsstrahlung. 2.2 Longitudinal Profile Heitler [26] developed a simplified model of an electromagnetic shower according to which the initial electron, with energy Eo, radiates a photon, of energy Eo/2, in the 1st radiation length. In the 2nd radiation length, the photon creates an electron-positron pair and the previous electron emits another photon; each particle now has energy Eo/4. This process continues until the critical energy Ec, defined in the previous section, is reached, at which point the shower is defined to be at maximum. At any radiation length, t, the 2see for example CONS110 section of [13]. 5 number of particles (electron, positron and photon) is N (t) = 2t = exp (t ln 2) and the energy per particle is E(t) = Eo/2t. Thus in this model the shower maximum occurs at tmax = ln (Eo/Ec)/ln 2 and the total number of particles at the maximum is Nmax = Eo/Ec. We can also calculate the integrated track length of the charged particles as L = (2/3 ln 2)(Eo/Ec). Although this model is over-simplified in assuming equality of all the primary cross- sections and in assuming that the shower is artificially cut off, it nevertheless provides a good description of the qualitative features of an electromagnetic cascade. Namely, it predicts that the total track length of the charged particles scales linearly, while the posi- tion of the shower maximum scales logarithmically with the initial energy of the shower. These are important consistency checks for the electromagnetic showers generated from any Monte Carlo. An analytic method for realistic shower development was created by Carlson and Op- penheimer [27] and later extended by Landau and Rumer [28]. Analytic shower equations are solved in two approximations, namely approximation A and approximation B [25]. One neglects the Compton effect and ionization loss in approximation A. One includes a constant energy loss per radiation length for all electrons and positrons in approximation B, which is therefore expected to be a better model of the data. The derivation of the integral spectra or number of particles (electrons and positrons) at different shower depth3 t in approximation A and B can be found in references [25, 29]. Greisen first parametrized the longitudinal profile of a photon-induced electromagnetic air shower [30]. The Greisen parametrization (GP) is based on analytic shower theory in approximation A. The difference between the more realistic approximation B and approx- imation A is that of a slowly increasing function of the age parameter (s). The number of particles in a given energy range increases when s < 1, reaches a maximum when s = 1 and then declines when s > 1. Hillas [31] later modified Greisen's parametrization to fit Monte Carlo simulation of 0.1-1 TeV photon-induced showers. This modified GP was later used by Fenyves et. al. [32] and is given for a single electron or photon of energy Eo as: N (π)(Eo, E, t) = 0.31 A(E) √y exp[t1(1 − 1.5 ln s1)] (7) where t1 is the modified depth defined to be t1 = t + aπ,γ(E) and s1 is the modified age parameter defined to be s1 = 3t1/(t1 + 2y). Superscript π denotes the total electrons and positrons following the convention in the literature. The parameter y called lethargy is defined to be y = ln(Eo/Ec), where Ec is the critical energy. One finds the parameters A(E), aπ(E) for electron-induced and aγ(E) for photon-induced showers by fitting Monte Carlo simulations. 2.3 Lateral Spread The transverse development of the shower is well described by a quantity called Moliere radius (RM). It is determined by the average angular deflection per radiation length at the 3Shower depth t = depth/Xo is always given in terms of the radiation length (Xo). 6 critical energy (Ec) due to multiple Coulomb scattering. The average deflection is given by [33]: E (cid:19)2 < δθ2 >= (cid:18) Es δt (8) where Es = p4π/α mec2 = 21.21 MeV is the scale energy. A numerical estimate of RM is obtained by considering the fraction of energy that escapes transverse to the shower axis [34, 35]: (9) U (r) E = R ∞ 0 R ∞ R ∞ 0 R ∞ r E(r, t)drdt 0 E(r, t)drdt where energy (E) is expressed as a function of shower depth (t) and radial distance r from the shower axis. By definition, ninety percent of the shower energy is contained inside a cylinder of radius RM centered on the shower axis. I.e., r = RM when U (r)/E = 0.1 in Eq. (9). Moliere radius is independent of the energy of the shower and depends only on the tracking medium in general. In Rossi's definitions, the Moliere radius is related to the critical energy (Ec) and radiation length (Xo) of the material [34, 35] through the equation RM = XoEs Ec , (10) which follows from Eq. (8). 3 Shower Simulations The target medium in our GEANT simulations, unless otherwise stated, is defined to be an ice cube of side 1 kilometer. Given the molecular composition, GEANT calculates the effective atomic number, Z = 7.2 and an effective mass A = 14.3 for the compound ice. Other parameters like radiation length, absorption length and cross-sections are calculated automatically, once A and Z are specified. GEANT gives all the details of particle tracking information like interaction points, total energy, energy lost in interaction, interaction time and so on. We used double precision for all the variables in our output data files to minimize roundoff errors. Unless stated otherwise, all particles are tracked down to total energy of 0.611 MeV, which is lower than the energy at which particles are still relativistic and emit Cherenkov radiation. 3.1 Radiation Length The radiation length given by Eq. (5) depends on the atomic and mass numbers of the material. However employing the definition given by Eq. (6), we can fit an exponential to the average energy of the injected electron at increasing depths. The average is taken from the data of a number of showers generated by the Monte Carlo. Our ability to recover the input value of Xo will serve as an internal consistency check to ensure that we are tracking all the particles of interest, along with their energies. 7 ) V e G ( y g r e n E 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Fit Data 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Distance (cm) Figure 1: Average energy of a 1 TeV electron injected in ice vs. distance in cm. Monte Carlo data points are obtained from 500 electron tracks and the errorbars correspond to standard error or s/√N , where s is the standard deviation and N is the number of tracks (500). The solid line is the exponential fit as in Eq. (6) with Eo = 1 TeV. This fit gives a radiation length of 42.2 ± 4.3 cm. A 100 MeV energy threshold was used in all 500 simulations. We generated 500 electron tracks each with 1 TeV primary energy (Ermo) incident on the ice target and calculated energy loss due to bremsstrahlung. We tracked all the electrons down to energy 100 MeV, well above the value of the critical energy so that bremsstrahlung is dominant. We show the energy of the injected electron, averaged over the 500 tracks, as a function of distance in Fig. 1. The errorbars correspond to standard error or s/√N , where s is the standard deviation and N is the number of tracks (500). A least squares fit of Eq. (6) to the Monte Carlo data keeping fixed Eo = 1 TeV yields a radiation length of 42.2 ± 4.3 cm. The confidence level (CL) for the fit is 95.7%. Given the molecular composition, GEANT also calculates the medium's radiation length from the standard formula. For ice, GEANT calculates Xo = 38.8 cm, which is roughly in agreement with the value we extract by tracking bremsstrahlung photons. 3.2 Moliere radius To calculate the Moliere radius, we construct an imaginary cylinder centered on the shower axis (up to the physical length of the shower). We add the energies, U , of all the tracks that leave the cylinder without re-entering. By varying the radius of the cylinder we obtain RM, which is the radius of the cylinder when the fraction U/Eo is equal to 0.1. The Moliere radii (RM) for lead and iron are found to be 1.6 cm and 2.1 cm, respectively (see Fig. 2). The value for lead is in agreement with experimental value of 1.6 cm [34]. We did not find the corresponding value for iron in the literature. A similar analysis for ice results in Rice M = 13 ± 1 cm. We quote the standard error, defined as s/√N , where s is 8 1 1 Eo = 1 GeV Ice Iron Lead Eo = 10 GeV Ice Iron Lead o E / U 0.1 o E / U 0.1 0.01 1 10 Radius (cm) 100 0.01 1 10 Radius (cm) 100 Figure 2: Moliere radius corresponds to the transverse development of the shower. When the fraction U/Eo (the ratio of total energy inside an imaginary tube along the showers axis to the initial energy of the shower) is 0.1 (the horizontal straight line), the corresponding radius is by definition, the Moliere radius for that material. It depends on the material and not on the energy of the shower. Here we compare showers of energies 1 GeV (left plot) and 10 GeV (right plot) for each material; the Moliere radius is observed to be independent of energy in this range. the standard deviation and N is the number of showers. It should be noted that the error bars are correlated from bin to bin. 3.3 Energy Loss in the Medium The signal from a Cherenkov type detector is proportional to the track length, which is itself proportional to the energy deposition of the shower particles in the medium. Therefore, we study the ionization loss per unit length in this section. To determine dE/dx due to ionization from Monte Carlo, we generated 500 separate 5 GeV electron tracks in ice and kept a record of the rate at which energy was lost due to ionization. The dots in Fig. 3 (left plot) shows dE/dx in ice for the 500 tracks at different Monte Carlo steps. We also calculated dE/dx ionization loss in carbon, which has roughly the same atomic weight as ice, as a consistency check. The result is shown in Fig. 3 (right plot). The average dE/dx curve from GEANT simulation matches the analytic approxima- tion, Eq. (2) as shown in Fig. 4. The average ionization loss in ice (left plot) in the relativistic region is approximately 2.4 MeVg−1cm−2 and the average minimum ioniza- tion loss is approximately 1.9 MeVg−1cm−2. We have also calculated the average dE/dx ionization loss in carbon (right plot) as a consistency check. 9 Figure 3: Electron stopping power or dE/dx ionization loss in ice (left plot) and in carbon (right plot). The dots correspond to energy lost per unit length at each Monte Carlo step of 500 electron tracks each with 5 GeV primary energy. 10 10 Ice GEANT average Bethe-Bloch Carbon GEANT average Bethe-Bloch ) 2 ^ m c / / g V e M ( n o i t i a z n o i ) x d E d ( / ) 2 ^ m c / / g V e M ( n o i t i a z n o i ) x d E d ( / 1 1 10 Electron energy (MeV) 100 1000 1 1 10 Electron energy (MeV) 100 1000 Figure 4: Average electron stopping power or dE/dx ionization loss in ice (left plot) and in carbon (right plot) calculated from GEANT data in Fig. 3. The error bars correspond to standard error or s/√N , where s is the standard deviation and N is the number of tracks (500 in this case). The solid lines are analytic curves calculated from Eq. (2). The agreement between Monte Carlo and the analytic formula is reasonably good in the relativistic rise region. 10 3.4 Critical Energy There are several methods to calculate the critical energy (Ec). The simplest is of course, the rough estimate in Eq. (4). One can also obtain a value for Ec in the Rossi definition from Eq. (10) after supplying the value of the Moliere radius (RM) and the radiation length (Xo) found earlier. Yet another method is to find the energy at which the dE/dx curves due to ionization and radiation losses intersect, which is the Monte Carlo equivalent of the analytic expression in Eq. (4). First, we find the critical energy from the Rossi definition using Eq. (10). The Moliere radius for ice was found to be Rice M = 13 ± 1 cm and the radiation length, Xo = 42.2 ± 4.3 cm. The critical energy is then calculated from Eq. (10) to be Eice c = 68.8 ± 8.8 MeV. Rossi [25] quotes 65 MeV for the critical energy of water, in agreement with our calculated value. As a consistency check, we also calculated the critical energy for lead using the Moliere radii found from GEANT simulation (section 3.2). The result is Elead c = 7.4 MeV, where we have used the radiation length of lead to be 0.56 cm. This is in agreement with the experimental result [36]. Second, we calculate the energy loss due to radiation according to the formula in Eq. (6) using the radiation length Xo = 42.2 ± 4.3 cm we found before. We then find the energy at which this line crosses the ionization loss curve (see Fig. 5). The value for critical energy (the energy at the crossing point of these two curves) found in this method is 90 ± 9 MeV, where the error includes both the standard error in the dE/dx points and the uncertainty in the radiation loss due to the error in Xo. The approximate formula (Eq. (4)) gives Ec = 84 MeV, close to what we found from simulation. The critical energy calculated in this way gives a higher value than Rossi definition, as expected. 3.5 Track Lengths If we consider all processes to be elastic except ionization, then an estimate of the upper bound for the total track length is given by, L = Eo/(cid:18) dE dx(cid:19)min ion (11) where (dE/dx)min ion is the minimum ionization energy loss per unit length. This value is about 1.9 MeVg−1cm−2 for ice, (see Fig. 4) which yields a maximum total track length of ∼ 1350 radiation lengths or 570 meters in ice for a 100 GeV shower. The actual total track length is less than this value, since the energy loss due to ionization increases in the relativistic region. We plot different track lengths in Fig. 6 for a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 25 showers) versus the kinetic energy threshold used in the Monte Carlo to generate them. The total track length for electrons and positrons together is denoted by total absolute track length, the sum of electron and positron track-lengths projected along the shower axis is denoted by total projected (e + p) track length and the difference between the electron and positron track lengths projected along the shower axis is denoted by total projected (e − p) track length. As we increase the threshold, so the simulation neglects 11 ) 2 ^ m c / / g V e M ( x d E d / 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 avg. ionization loss Bethe-Bloch avg. radiation loss 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Energy (MeV) Figure 5: Radiation and ionization energy loss vs. electron energy plot from GEANT Monte Carlo simulation. The diagonal straight lines correspond to energy loss due to radiation with radiation length Xo = 42.2 ± 4.3 cm, where the lowest curve corresponds to Xo = 42.2 + 4.3 cm and the highest to Xo = 42.2 − 4.3 cm. The average ionization energy loss data are plotted as obtained before (see Fig. 4). The error bars show the standard errors on the dE/dx points. The crossing point of the two curves gives one definition of the critical energy. track-lengths from low energy particles, we expect these total calculated track-lengths to decrease. We have also compared our results to those obtained using the ZHS Monte Carlo in Fig. 6. Although the qualitative behavior of this scaling is the same for both Monte Carlos, ZHS track lengths are consistently higher than GEANT track lengths by about 50%. In particular, GEANT produces an absolute track length of 400 meter for 0.1 MeV kinetic energy threshold or 0.611 MeV total energy threshold. ZHS on the other hand produces 650 meters of absolute track length for the same threshold, which is significantly above our estimated maximum of 570 meters, based on the GEANT generated 100 GeV data shown in Fig. 6 and application of Eq. (11). The total track lengths increase with shower energy as more particles are created. The track lengths are expected to increase linearly with energy for a given a energy threshold used in the Monte Carlo. This scaling is shown in Fig. 7 below. Straight line fits to the absolute track length and the projected (e − p) track length are also plotted. The slopes of those straight lines are 3.2 and 0.5 respectively. 3.6 Particle yield To generate a longitudinal profile of the shower, one counts the number of particles crossing planes perpendicular to the shower axis inside the ice. We have calculated profiles for both the total number of particles (e + p) and for the excess charge (e − p) in the shower. 12 1000 100 10 ) r e t e m ( h t g n e l k c a r T GEANT absolute GEANT projected (e+p) GEANT projected (e-p) ZHS absolute ZHS projected (e+p) ZHS projected (e-p) 1 0.1 1 Kinetic energy threshold (MeV) 10 Figure 6: Total track lengths as functions of the kinetic energy threshold used in the Monte Carlos. Here we show the total absolute track-lengths, the total (e + p) track-lengths projected along the shower axis and the total (e − p) track-lengths projected along the shower axis. The analysis is done for a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 25 showers) using the GEANT and ZHS Monte Carlo simulations. 10000 ) r e t e m ( h t g n e l k c a r T 1000 100 absolute projected (e+p) projected (e-p) 10 100 Shower Energy (GeV) 1000 Figure 7: Total absolute track length, total projected (e + p) track length and total projected (e − p) track length as functions of shower energy from GEANT simulations. The linear scaling of the track lengths with the shower energy is clearly observed. We used a kinetic energy threshold of 1 MeV (see Fig. 6) and averaged over 25 showers in each case. 13 ) p + e ( s e c i t r a p l f o r e b m u N 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 EGS4 GEANT ZHS 8 6 14 Depth (radiation length) 10 12 16 18 20 Figure 8: The longitudinal profiles of a 30 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) in iron simulated by GEANT. The longitudinal profile is calculated by counting the number of electrons and positrons crossing planes on the shower axis every half radiation length with total energy greater than 1.5 MeV. We also plot the longitudinal profiles of the same shower from EGS4 (from PDG 2000 [37]) and by ZHS Monte Carlos. As a consistency check of GEANT, we have simulated 30 GeV electron-induced showers in iron and compared the profiles with the modified Greisen parametrization, Eq. (7). The longitudinal profiles were obtained by adding the number of particles with total energy greater than 1.5 MeV, crossing planes spaced one-half radiation length apart, and perpendicular to the shower axis (see Fig. 8). The number of particles agrees reasonably well with EGS4, an electromagnetic shower code developed at SLAC which simulates the same shower [37]. The total number of particles from ZHS simulation is also shown in the plot. We have fitted the GEANT generated electromagnetic showers in ice by the modified GP in Eq. (7). We used the value for critical energy (Ec) in ice to be 67.7 MeV. The fitting parameters and the confidence level (CL) of the fits for showers of energy 100 GeV (averaged over 100 showers), 500 GeV (averaged over 50 showers) and 1 TeV (averaged over 20 showers) each with 5 MeV threshold energy are given in Table 1 for both electron and photon primaries. The fits to longitudinal profiles are plotted in Fig. 9. 14 ) p + e ( f o r e b m u N 1000 100 10 1 0.1 1 TeV 500 GeV 100 GeV electron-induced 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depth (t) 12 14 16 18 20 ) p + e ( f o r e b m u N 1000 100 10 1 0.1 1 TeV 500 GeV 100 GeV photon-induced 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depth (t) 12 14 16 18 20 Figure 9: Longitudinal profiles of electron-induced (left) and photon-induced (right) showers in ice of primary energy 1 TeV, 500 GeV and 100 GeV, averaged over 20, 50 and 100 showers respectively. The threshold energy used is 5 MeV. The error-bars correspond to standard error. The smooth curves are Greisen parametrization fits as given in Eq. (7). The fitting parameters and the confidence levels (CL) for the fits are given in Table 1. The critical energy for ice used in the fits is 68.8 MeV. Table 1: Greisen parameters for GEANT showers in ice with 5 MeV threshold and Ec = 68.8 MeV. Primary Eo (GeV) A(E) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.52 0.51 0.52 aπ, γ CL(%) 0.33 0.26 0.76 0.99 1.14 1.01 100 500 1000 100 500 1000 γ e− 96.3 81.9 71.8 95.6 95.8 88.4 The parameter A(E) gives over-all normalization for the number of particles. We see from Table 1 that the number of particles at the shower maximum for a photon-induced shower (A(E) = 0.50) is slightly less than that of an electron-induced shower (A(E) = 0.52). The other parameter aπ, γ takes care of the shift of the whole shower between a photon-induced (aγ) and an electron-induced (aπ) shower. This shift is approximately 0.7 radiation length. We have also fitted GEANT generated 100 GeV electron and photon induced showers (each averaged over 50 showers) in ice with 0.611 MeV threshold energy by GP given in Eq. (7). The fitting parameters and the CL for the fits are given in Table 2. The fits with longitudinal profiles are plotted in Fig. 10. The critical energy in ice for the fits is 68.8 MeV as before. 15 120 100 80 60 40 20 ) p + e ( f o r e b m u N 0 0 2 4 6 8 electron induced photon induced 10 12 Depth (t) 14 16 18 20 Figure 10: Greisen parametrization fits (smooth curves) to the longitudinal profiles of 100 GeV electron and photon induced showers (each averaged over 50 showers) with 0.611 MeV threshold energy from GEANT. The fitting parameters are given in Table 2. The critical energy for ice used in the fits is 68.8 MeV. Table 2: Greisen parameters for GEANT showers in ice with 0.611 MeV threshold and Ec = 68.8 MeV. Primary Eo (GeV) A(E) 0.65 0.66 aπ, γ CL(%) 0.16 0.66 85.6 89.1 γ e− 100 100 A three parameter fit to the GEANT generated 100 GeV electron-induced shower in ice leaving the critical energy (Ec) as a free parameter along with A(E) and aπ gives Ec = 58.3 ± 3.1 MeV. This is within error bars of the critical energy (Ec = 68.8 ± 8.8 MeV) found from Moliere radius calculation. The CL for this fit is 97.7%. A comparison of averages over 50 showers of 100 GeV each from GEANT to the same from ZHS Monte Carlo (see Fig. 11) shows about a 25 − 35% discrepancy for the total number of particles at the shower max. The percentage discrepancy between the two simulations remains the same at higher energies. maximum, about twice Askaryan's original rough estimate [1]. The excess charge in the shower (N (e − p)/N (e + p)) is about 18% at the shower Fig. 12 shows a longitudinal depth distribution of a much different kind. Unlike particles crossing planes transverse to the shower axis, here we look at the distribution of the complete count of excess electrons present in bins of one radiation length along the shower axis. The figure shows the distribution of excess electrons (dN (e − p)/dt) in a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) with 0.611 MeV total energy threshold. The distribution is broken down into different energy bins, showing that half of the excess 16 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 l s e c i t r a p f o r e b m u N 0 0 2 4 6 8 GEANT (e+p) ZHS (e+p) GEANT (e-p) ZHS (e-p) 10 12 Depth (t) 14 16 18 20 Figure 11: Comparison between shower profiles of a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers in each case) from GEANT and from ZHS Monte Carlos. The error bars correspond to standard error, or s/√N , where s is the standard deviation and N is the number of showers. The total energy threshold used is 0.611 MeV in both cases. The difference in particle yield between the two Monte Carlos is 25 − 35% and remains the same at higher energy. electrons have energy 5 MeV or lower. This plot shows clearly the important point that the bulk of the particles at shower maximum have low energy and contribute significantly to the Cherenkov emission. 3.7 1-D Model Study The comparisons in Figs. 8 & 11 prompt us to check the sensitivity of shower depth and particle number at maximum to the cross-sections assumed in a simulation, since ZHS and GEANT codes differ slightly in cross-sections for some processes (a few percent). To investigate this question in a setting that is completely under our control, we have written a one dimensional Monte Carlo that elaborates on Heitler's simple model to make it realistic. We include Compton scattering, positron annihilation, ionization loss, Moeller scattering, where interaction lengths are chosen from exponential distributions. The default values for the cross-sections are taken from GEANT. We examine the effect of changing cross- sections of various processes. The total number of particles (e + p and γ) from the 1-D model scales linearly with shower energy and the position of the shower maximum scales logarithmically with energy as expected. The effect of changing individual cross-sections (increasing and decreasing by 25%) are listed in Table 3 & 4. We also list the total number of electrons and positrons (N (e + p)) at the maximum depth (te+p max) and the total number of photons (N (γ)) at the maximum depth (tγ max) for the default values of the cross-sections (denoted by σo). 17 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 t d / ) p - e ( N d E > 50 MeV 5 < E < 50 MeV E < 5 MeV 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Depth (t) 14 16 18 20 Figure 12: Depth distribution of excess charge (dN (e − p)/dt) broken down into 3 different energy bins: E < 5 MeV, 5 < E < 50 MeV and E > 50 MeV. This figure shows that half of the excess electrons are created with energy below 5 MeV. We used a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) with 0.611 MeV threshold to generate this plot. Table 3: Results of increasing individual cross-section by 25% in the 1-D Monte Carlo. The default setting (GEANT) is denoted by σo. The cross-sections are changed one at a time from their default values. Parameter te+p max N (e + p) tγ max N (γ) δ 5.6 269 6.4 1396 σo 6.9 266 6.9 1418 Brem. Pair Comp. 6.4 231 6.7 1209 6.9 281 6.4 1292 7.2 236 7.0 1570 6.7 265 6.4 1416 6.2 307 5.9 1495 dE/dx Anni. Table 4: Results of decreasing individual cross-section by 25% in the 1-D Monte Carlo. The default setting (GEANT) is denoted by σo. The cross-sections are changed one at a time from their default values. Parameter te+p max N (e + p) tγ max N (γ) δ 7.4 298 6.9 1544 σo 6.9 266 6.9 1418 Brem. Pair Comp. 7.4 298 6.9 1544 7.4 249 7.4 1516 6.4 310 6.7 1173 6.1 271 6.4 1399 7.7 212 8.2 1259 dE/dx Anni. The individual cross-sections are changed one at a time from their default values. The changes in the values of tmax and N are noticeable, but the percentage changes are much smaller than the percentage changes in the cross-sections. For example, comparing the ef- fect of increasing the bremsstrahlung cross section, listed in the column under "Brem." in Table 3, the depth and number at maximum change by at most 4% and 15% respectively, 18 compared to the default values, listed under "σo, for a 25% change in the cross section. It seems that the shower features are not especially sensitive to precise values of an in- dividual cross section. We have not made an exhaustive study of the effects of changing combinations of cross sections in all possible ways, but we have seen no indication that effects would be large without pathological distortions of the cross-sections. 4 Shower Fluctuation Any determination of shower energy is intrinsically uncertain because of the fluctuations from shower to shower for the same injected energy. The fluctuations must be quantified compactly so an efficient and realistic energy uncertainty from this source can be assigned to detected showers. Fortunately, for UHE showers the huge numbers of particles and fractionally smaller fluctuations make this less problematic than for small showers. We summarize an approach to the fluctuation question in this section. Conservation of total energy plays an important role in shower development. The shape of a shower strongly depends on the position and energy of the first hard bremsstrahlung - the later the first hard bremsstrahlung event, the deeper the shower maximum is. However, for any shower, the primary energy (i.e., the total energy of the shower) qualitatively dictates the energy loss profile and the particle yield with depth. It is common practice to describe the mean longitudinal profile of an electromagnetic shower by a Gamma distribution which is similar in shape to the Greisen parametrization. The Gamma distribution normalized to unity is given by f (t; a, b) = b (bt)a−1e−bt Γ(a) . (12) However, Grindhammer et. al. [38] have shown that the fluctuations of the parameters a and b from an average profile do not necessarily follow the individual shower fluctuations. It is more reasonable to fit individual profiles by the Gamma distribution. One can then fit a 2-dimensional Gaussian distribution to the parameter set {a, b} thus obtained and study shower fluctuation by studying these parameters. The correlation between these parameters a and b can be expressed as: ρ = Covariance (a, b)/σaσb, (13) where σa and σb are standard deviations of the parameters a and b respectively and Covariance (a, b) is the covariance matrix. The correlation ρ is roughly independent of the energy of the shower. 4.1 Fit to Simulations We have fitted the Gamma distribution Eq. (12) to 50 GEANT generated individual shower profiles in ice4. The energy of each shower is 100 GeV with 0.611 MeV threshold energy. The parameters a and b are extracted from the Gamma function fits. Two such fits to individual shower profiles are plotted in Fig. 13. 19 Figure 13: Individual shower profiles of 100 GeV showers from GEANT with 0.611 MeV threshold energy. The solid curves are Gamma function fits to the profiles. The parameters a and b in Eq. (12) are obtained from the fits. Figure 14: Scatter plot (left plot) of the parameters a and b from the Gamma distribution fit to 50 individual shower profiles each with energy 100 GeV and 0.611 MeV threshold. The contours are from a 2-dimensional Gaussian distribution with mean (a, b) and (σa, σb) obtained from the data set a, b generated as described in the text. Shower fluctuations (right plot) due to variation of the parameters a and b within a standard deviation. The dark solid curve is the profile with mean values of a and b. All particle numbers are normalized to 1. 20 Fig. 14a shows the scatter plot of the parameters a and b obtained by fitting 50 individual showers. We also show the contours of the 2-dimensional Gaussian distribution fit to the set of parameters {a, b}. This plot is similar in shape to the one obtained by Grindhammer using GEANT [38]. The correlation coefficient ρ = 0.72 we found is close to 0.73 as found by Grindhammer et. al. Fig. 14b shows shower-to-shower fluctuations as we vary the parameters a and b within a standard deviation (σa and σb) of their mean values (< a > and < b >). The dark solid curve corresponds to the shower with mean values of the parameters a and b. As can be seen, the shower maximum can vary as much as ∼ 50%. As remarked above, the variations become statistically less significant as the energy rises to the multi-PeV range, where UHE neutrino detectors such as RICE are sensitive. The uncertainties from fluctuations, though requiring study, are not expected to be a major part of the uncertainties in event locations and energies in any case. 5 Electromagnetic Pulse Theory Overview Given a current density, one calculates the electric field by straightforward application of Maxwell's equations. The most useful form of the electric field is the complex vector ~Eω(~x), depending on three-dimensional coordinate ~x and angular frequency ω. Before getting into the details of the radiation field calculation, we review its general features and several subtle points involving coherence, and near and far field limits. The energy radiated per unit frequency interval per unit solid angle is proportional to Eω2. In an asymptotically far field limit R → ∞, the radiation field Eω ∝ 1/R, where R is the distance from the shower to the field point. Because the quantity Eω has dimensions of mass in particle physics units and depends linearly on the track length L (reviewed below), one expects the frequency dependence Eω ∝ Lω/R on dimensional grounds. This linear dependence on ω breaks down at high frequencies, when wavelengths are smaller than the typical dimensions of the shower and create a coherence cutoff. The purpose of this section is to develop the concepts and formalism needed to address this and other issues. The asymptotically far field is not a feature of Cherenkov physics as commonly pre- sented in texts or applied in particle physics detectors. In particle physics applications, the track length is comparable to the distance to the observation point R. Textbook treatments take the limit that the track length is infinite, [39, 40, 41] in which case the electric field Eω ∼ √ω/√ρ, where ρ is the cylindrical radial coordinate. In this situation, the radiation intensity is proportional to ω, a familar feature of laboratory Cherenkov ra- diation. The cylindrical symmetry dictates this special frequency and radial dependence. The transition from cylindrical configuration to spherical configuration is associated with the terms "Fresnel and Fraunhoffer" zones. (Conditions of "far fields" R ≫ λ, ρ ≫ λ are separate and assumed throughout; criteria separating the zones are given below.) The 4particle number (e + p) normalized to 1. 21 conditions of the RICE experiment are such that spherical symmetry is a good approxi- mation for the most distant events, R ∼ 1 km, while Fresnel zone effects start to become noticeable for the nearest likely events, R ∼ 100 m. Consequently both are reviewed. There are two methods to calculate the electric field from the charged particles in a shower. One method calculates the electric field from each charged track and adds them by superposition. The other method parametrizes the shower's current and calculates elec- tric fields analytically. Direct track-by-track calculation and superposition are presently limited to the Fraunhoffer zone. The result is simple, and depends only on the angle to the observation point. The analytic method works in either zone, and gives a compact way to take a few parameters characterizing the shower and calculate the field. Of course one must have a good parameterization for this to be a good approximation. By using both the analytic and numerical methods, with their different strengths, we are able to characterize the coherence structure of showers in considerably more detail than previous work. The coherence extends to much higher frequencies than previously thought. This is a very important point, confirmed by two independent methods, and clears up a misconception that coherence should cut off at about 1 GHz. 5.1 Fraunhoffer Limit The Fraunhoffer limit is appropriate to most of the RICE sensitive volume. It forms the basis for our numerical, track-by-track computation of the field produced by a shower at antenna sites remote from the shower. In this subsection, we derive the expression for the field produced by an individual track, which forms the basis for the calculation of the full field calculated from a whole shower. In the next subsection, we outline the method of parametrizing the shower as an effective current and calculating the field directly from that current. The power at time t, position ~x, radiated per unit solid angle by a moving electric charge is given, in Gaussian units, by [39] dP (t) dΩ = c 4πR ~E(~x, t)ret2, (14) evaluated at the retarded time t = t′ + R(t′)/c. (For now we calculate effects in vac- uum; shortly we will supply the factors for the effects of a medium.) We use the Fourier transformed variables R ~Eω = R ~E(t) = 1 √2π Z ∞ √2π Z ∞ 1 −∞ −∞ R ~E(t)eiωtdt ; R ~Eωe−iωtdω . The energy radiated per unit frequency interval per solid angle is then given by d2I dωdΩ = c 4πREω2. (15) (16) (17) We will require the frequency dependence of the fields, so we work with the Fourier trans- formed fields below. 22 Figure 15: Geometry for calculating electromagnetic fields from a single track segment. (r1, t1) and (r2, t2) are the starting and ending position and time of the segment along which the particle moves with velocity ~v. The expression for the radiation field from a point source is conventionally defined as the electric field term linear in the acceleration ~β: ~E(~x, t) = q c   ~β} (1 − ~β · n)3R  n × {(n − ~β) × ret (18) where ~β is the velocity of the particle, n is the direction of the observer and R is the distance from the track to the observation point (see Fig. 15). The factor 1/R that accompanies the ~β factor is the other trademark of the radiation field. As is the case for the term that comes from the boosted Coulomb field, which has no explicit acceleration dependence, Eq. (18) is singular at the Cherenkov angle in a medium with real index of refraction greater than 1. Combining Eq. (15) and Eq. (18) we have ~Eω(~x) = s q2 8π2c Z ∞ −∞ eiω(t′+R(t′)/c)  ~β} (1 − ~β · n)2R  n × {(n − ~β) ×  dt′. (19) At distances large compared to the range of motion of the source, n is approximately constant and R(t′) ≈ ~x − n · ~r(t′). (20) This is the Fraunhoffer approximation: the error in the phase ω~x − ~x′/c must be kept small compared to 2π. Conditions for use of this approximation are discussed in the next 23 subsection5 (see Eq. (29)). After integrating Eq. (19) by parts, and using the boundary conditions to set the end point contributions to zero, one finds [39] R ~Eω(~x) ≈ −iωs q2 8π2c eiωR/cZ ∞ −∞ eiω(t−n·~r/c)[n × (n × ~β)]dt, (21) where R ≡ ~x. We will later apply this track-by-track expession to segments over which ~β is constant with time from t1 < t < t2. On each segment ~r = ~r1 + c~β(t − t1). We insert the result into Eq. (21) and obtain R ~Eω(~x) = 1 √2π (cid:18) q c(cid:19) eikReiω(t1−n·~r1/c) ~β⊥ (eiωδt(1−n·~β) − 1) 1 − n · ~β (22) where n × (n × ~β) = −~β⊥, and δt = t2 − t1. In a medium we replace c → c/n = c/√ǫµ, where n = n(ω) is the refractive index of the material and ǫ = ǫ(ω), the dielectric constant. We also replace ~E → ~D = ǫ ~E and ~β → ~v n c = n~β everywhere, to get √2π (cid:18) µrq R ~Eω(~x) = 1 c2 (cid:19) eikReiω(t1− n c n·~r1)~v⊥ (eiωδt(1−n·~βn) − 1) 1 − n · ~βn (23) where µr is the relative permeability and k = nω/c. The particle velocity ~v in the medium can be greater than that of light. The apparent singularity in Eq. (23) at 1 − n · ~βn = 0 defines the Cherenkov angle θc as cos θc ≡ 1/nβ. However there is no singularity, as seen by expanding the exponent. Close to the Cherenkov angle, Eq. (23) reduces to the form R ~Eω(~x) = iω √2π (cid:18) µrq c2 (cid:19) eikReiω(t1− n c n·~r1)~v⊥δt. (24) Eqs. (23 & 24), used by ZHS without detailed derivation [9], are coded into the simulation to produce the field values for the tracks. Eq. (24) is explicitly linear in the track length ~vδt, a feature we mentioned earlier. Eqs. (23 & 24) are incorporated into a track-by-track Monte Carlo simulation. The code uses the exact formula Eq. (23) unless the conditions are very close to the Cherenkov angle, posing a 0/0 numerical problem, in which case Eq. (24) is used. Numerical summation of the electric field from all the tracks weighted by the proper charge automatically incorporates the features of coherence. As illustrated shortly, coher- ence produces a signal that peaks at the Cherenkov angle (θc), with a width away from the Cherenkov angle that shrinks with increasing frequency [9]. The coherence features are sufficiently intricate that we have devoted separate subsections to the topic. 5Analysis of the effects of keeping the next order in the expansion of the phase shows that significant deviations from the Fraunhoffer result appear at distances where the Fresnel zone sets in [42], as discussed from a general point of view below [43]. 24 Figure 16: Shower parametrization is done by assuming the longitudinal excess charge devel- opment to be a Gaussian n(z ′) moving along the shower axis (z-direction) with speed v. n is the direction of the observer, making an angle θ with the shower axis. ρ is the transverse distance to the observer. 5.2 Parametrization Method Charges of opposite sign which radiate coherently will give electric fields that cancel. It is the excess charge (e − p) that determines the net field. Following Buniy and Ralston (BR) [43], one can then parameterize the excess (net) charge development in a shower and calculate the electric field due to the prescribed relativistic current. This is a flexible and compact approach that takes a few essential parameters from the shower and allows inspection of both the Fresnel and Fraunhoffer zones. We outline this method to keep our presentation self-contained. The vector potential ~A in the Lorentz gauge (adapted to ǫ(ω) and µ = 1) is given by ~Aω(~x) = 4π c√2π Z d3x′ eik~x−~x′ ~x − ~x′ Z dt′eiωt′ ~J(t′~x′) (25) The BR method parametrizes the excess charge development in the shower by a current along the shower axis (z) as ~J(t′, ~x′) = ~v n(z′)f (z′ − vt′, ~ρ′), (26) where ρ = px2 + y2 is the radial distance from the shower axis, and n(z′) is the excess charge (e − p) distribution, approximated by a Gaussian near the shower maximum (see Fig. 16), as n(z) = e−z2/2a2 . (27) nmax√2π This is analogous to Greisen and Rossi's parameterization [44], where nmax is the excess charge at the shower maximum, except that the excess (not total) charge (e−p) is modeled in the BR case. The parameter a corresponds to the "longitudinal spread" of the shower 25 near maximum and can be extracted by fitting a Gaussian to simulations of the excess charge profile of a shower. The region of the shower over which the fields arrive nearly in phase at a distance R(t) is called the coherence zone [43], and is given by ∆zcoh = s R k sin2 θ , (28) where k = 2π/λ is the wave number and θ is the angle between R and the shower axis (z). The value of the dimensionless ratio η, η = (cid:18) a ∆zcoh(cid:19)2 = ka2 R sin2 θ, (29) determines how one should calculate the field. The ranges η < 1 and η > 1 correspond to the Fraunhoffer and Fresnel zones, respectively. In the case of η ≥ 1, the series expansion of the phase, Eq. (20) fails, and the exact phase must be kept. As noted earlier, both the Fraunhoffer and Fresnel zones are far-field problems in the sense that kR ≫ 1 is assumed in both cases. For ω ∼ GHz the Fraunhoffer approximation6 is appropriate for R > 100 m distances typical of the RICE experiment. However, for a test beam experiment, where the interplay between different length scales is important, the Buniy-Ralston method to calculate the field in the Fresnel zone is required. 5.3 Radiated Power and The Form Factor We return to the ansatz Eq. (26), which describes a current with transverse distribution independent of the longitudinal evolution. This is a reasonable assumption after the first few radiation lengths of the shower development. We make the specific ansatz ~J(t′, ~x′) = ezq v n(z′) g(~ρ′) δ(z′ − vt′). (30) Note that the transverse extent of showers is small compared to the longitudinal extent. The phase and the denominator in Eq. (25) can be safely expanded in cylindrical coordi- nates as ~x − ~x′ = q(z − z′)2 + ρ2 − 2~ρ · ~ρ′ + ρ′2 ≈ R(z, z′)(cid:18)1 − ρρ′ R2! R2 cos φ′(cid:19) + O R′2 and 6Shown in detail earlier (Eqs. (23 & 24)). 1 ~x − ~x′ ≈ 1 R 26 (31) (32) where R(z, z′) = p(z − z′)2 + ρ2 and R′ = pz′2 + ρ′2. This expansion of the transverse variables avoids the Fraunhoffer approximation, and leads to a "factored" expression for the field: R ~Eω(~x) ≈ I F (ω). (33) where I is an integral characteristic of the longitudinal shower history, and F (ω) is called the form factor. The integral I can be evaluated in the saddle-point approximation, as detailed elsewhere [43], or evaluated by Monte Carlo. This feature of factorization to express the field using a form factor works in both the Fraunhoffer and Fresnel zones. In the Fraunhoffer zone, there is a further, and very remarkable, simplification. Keep- ing the term linear in z′, and dropping terms of order R′2/R2 in the phase expansion, the electric field at the Cherenkov angle (θc) is R ~Eω(~x) = q 2√2π ieikR(cid:20)ez(cid:18) ω c2 − ǫv (cid:19) − eρ ×Z dz′n(z′)Z dρ′ρ′g(ρ′)Z dφ′e−i nω k cos θc k sin θc ǫv (cid:21) (34) c ρ′ sin θc cos φ′ It is remarkable that all terms in the phase exponent depending on z′ have vanished. This means that radiation from the shower is coherent over the entire length of the shower in the Fraunhoffer approximation: the "coherence zone" is limited only by the track length7. In obtaining these results, the Cherenkov condition cos θc = c/nv = 1/nβ and the approximations: cos θc = z/R, sin θc = ρ/R (see Fig. 16) and ρ′/R ≪ 1 were used. F (ω), which is given by Inspecting the transverse integral, we see that it alone contributes to the form factor ⊥), ⊥g(~x′ F (ω) = Z d2x′ = Z ∞ = 2πZ ∞ ⊥ e−i~k⊥·~x′ dρ′ρ′g(ρ′)Z 2π dρ′ρ′g(ρ′) Jo(cid:18) nω 0 0 0 ρ′ sin θc(cid:19) . c dφ′ e−i nω c ρ′ sin θc cos φ′ , (35) Here Jo is the Bessel function of order unity. Just as in particle physics usage, F (ω) is the Fourier transform of the (transverse) excess charge distribution. The preceding analysis leads to a convenient expression for the electric field at the Cherenkov angle in the Fraunhoffer approximation, which apart from some normalization factors is given by R ~Eω(~x) = q 2√2π I(a) ω sin θc c2 F (ω). (36) The radiated power at the Cherenkov angle (θc) depends on the form factor only. As noted earlier, the same form factor can be used in both the Fraunhoffer and Fresnel limits, so that laboratory information about the form factor can be used directly. The form factor is the central topic of subsequent sections discussing the coherence. 7The importance of the coherence zone is well known in the Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal [14, 15, 17] effect, where the lengthening coherence zone suppresses bremsstrahlung. The Cherenkov condition causes the coherence zone to expand to equal the entire track length. 27 6 Electric Field Pulse Calculation In this section we carry out the computational outline just developed. The vector nature of superposition is taken into account. The analytic construction of the form factor, de- veloped earlier, is adapted to the numerical calculation, so that two independent methods can be compared. We observe using the simulation data that coherence extends far above the frequency regime anticipated from simple estimates using characteristic scales such as the Moliere radius. 6.1 Vector Superposition To calculate the electric pulse from a GEANT generated shower, we summed the con- tributions to the electric field in Eqs. (23 & 24) from all charged track segments us- ing full 3-dimensional geometry. We denote the observation point by a unit vector, n = (sin θ cos φ, sin θ sin φ, cos θ). The starting time t1 of each track segment is ob- tained from GEANT output. The time interval δt for each track-segment is calculated for a particle of total energy E (from GEANT output) traveling at constant speed β through- out the track segment. Slowing of low energy particles is thus taken care of approximately. The electrical field has an azimuthal symmetry which will be investigated later. The electric field is a complex vector quantity. As such there are two questions of coherence, one to do with phase and one to do with the vector nature of the field. The vector nature of the field depends on the term n × (n × ~v) = −~v⊥ in Eqs. (23 & 24). This construction picks out the component of the velocity which is perpendicular to the direction of the observer. Since the track segments vary in direction, we add the electric field contributions as vectors which allow any cancellation that may occur. The electric field amplitude is then proportional to the track length transverse to the direction to the observer (~v⊥δt). On the Cherenkov cone, one then expects that the field generated by the entire shower is proportional to the track length projected along the shower axis times the sine of the Cherenkov angle. The projected track length thus accounts for the vector nature of the electric field for tracks that go in different directions, and serves as an important diagnostic of the whole procedure. However, the projected track length says nothing in itself about the conditions for phase coherence, which is the topic of the next subsection. 6.2 Phase Coherence The numerically generated phases of the fields, track-by-track, are determined by the complex exponentials in Eq. (23). We call the phase angles ω(t1 − n c n · ~r1) and ωδt(1 − n · ~βn) the translational phase (TP) and the Cherenkov phase (CP) respectively. The translational phase is kinematic, a consequence of translational invariance, and depends on the beginning of each track segment. The Cherenkov phase vanishes at the Cherenkov angle, which a point of stationary phase and dominates the emission. Two or more track segments will contribute in phase if the observer lies on the Cherenkov cone, and the beginnings of the tracks do not destructively interfere. 28 Cherenkov Phase (CP) Angle = Cherenkov 500 MHz 1 GHz 5 GHz 10 GHz Translational Phase (TP) Angle = Cherenkov 500 MHz 1 GHz 5 GHz 10 GHz 1 0.1 0.01 n o i t u b i r t s D i 1 0.1 n o i t u b i r t s D i 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.001 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 Phase Angle (Radian) 2 3 4 1e-05 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Phase Angle in Radian Figure 17: Distributions of the translational phase (TP) and the Cherenkov phase (CP) at the Cherenkov angle (θ = θc) for a single shower of energy 100 GeV and threshold of 0.611 MeV. The TP (left plot) shows strong coherence (sharp peak) at low frequencies. A slight positive enhancement of the TP can be interpreted as particle positions slightly lagging the light cone because β < 1. The CP (right plot), in comparison, remains strongly peaked at all frequencies, which underscores the argument that the phase (CP) varies a little over the whole track. We studied the distribution of the TP and CP at the Cherenkov angle (θ ≈ 55.8◦) and at an angle (θ = 40◦) off the Cherenkov angle ( Figs. 17 & 18). We used a single 100 GeV shower with 0.611 MeV total energy threshold to make the phase distribution plots. We studied the distribution at frequencies: 10 GHz, 5 GHz, 1 GHz and 500 MHz. The distribution of the TP (Fig. 17) shows a strong peak at low frequency, indicating coherent phase emission from track segments at the Cherenkov angle. At high frequencies, the distribution tends to become flat, with random phases indicating a loss of coherence. A net positive phase indicates the particle positions slightly lagging behind the light cone due to their speed β slightly less than 1. The flat distribution of the TP in Fig. 18, on the other hand, clearly indicates random phases coming from track segments at angles off the Cherenkov cone. The distribution of the CP remains qualitatively the same both at the Cherenkov angle (Fig. 17) and at angles off the Cherenkov angle (Fig. 18). It is also apparent that frequency dependence of the CP is very weak. The preceding discussion makes clear that phase coherence is dominated by the TP. Finally, the distribution of TP and CP variables are substantially uncorrelated (see Figs. 19 & 20). These features indicate a valid factorization of the electric field, leading to an independent motivation for the Ansatz Eq. (30) and consequent appearance of the form factor. We discuss this factorization in the following subsection. 29 0.1 Translational Phase (TP) Angle = 40 degrees 500 MHz 1 GHz 5 GHz 10 GHz n o i t u b i r t s D i 0.01 -4 -3 -2 Cherenkov Phase (CP) Angle = 40 degrees 500 MHz 1 GHz 5 GHz 10 GHz 1 0.1 n o i t u b i r t s D i 0.01 0.001 0.0001 -1 0 1 Phase Angle (Radian) 2 3 4 1e-05 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Phase Angle (Radian) Figure 18: Distributions of the TP and the CP at an angle (θ = 40◦) off the Cherenkov cone for a single shower of energy 100 GeV with total energy threshold of 0.611 MeV. The flat distributions of the TP (left plot) at all frequencies indicates the randomness of phases coming from randomly located track segments. The CP distribution (right plot), is qualitatively the same as the case on Cherenkov angle. Taken together, these features indicate that phase coherence is dominated by the TP. Figure 19: Scatter plots of the translational phase (TP) and the Cherenkov phase (CP) at the Cherenkov angles (θc) and at frequencies: 1 GHz (left plot) and 5 GHz (right plot). A correlation between the two variables would appear as a slanted line, or similar feature. The plots demonstrate that the translational and Cherenkov phases are substantially uncorrelated. 30 Figure 20: Same as Fig. 19 at angle (θ = 40◦). 6.3 Factorization of the Electric Field, and the Discrete Form Factor The electric field from all the shower particles can be factorized because the TP and CP phases are uncorrelated, as shown above. We write the field in factored form as Etot ω ∝ Xj eiφTP j (eiφCP j − 1) ∼ Xj eiφTP j Xj (eiφCP j − 1) , (37) where the sums are over all track segments. The factorization takes a rather simple form at the Cherenkov angle. The electric field close to the Cherenkov angle in Eq. (24) can be written approximately for a single track as R ~Eω(~x) = iω √2π (cid:18) q c2(cid:19) ~v⊥δt eikR eiωz1( 1 v − n c cos θ) e−i nω c n·~r1⊥. (38) The approximation t1 ≃ z1/v has been assumed in writing Eq. (38), which is well sup- ported by the TP phase plot at the Cherenkov angle shown above. The phase angle ωz1(1/v− n cos θ/c) vanishes for the Cherenkov condition (cos θc = c/nv) and we have full coherence along the z-direction (shower axis) as observed earlier. We now write the factorization in Eq. (37) for the total electric field at the Cherenkov angle from all the charged particles in the shower as R ~Etot ω (~x) = iω √2π (cid:18) q c2(cid:19) eikRXj sj(~v⊥)jδtj e−i nω c n·(~r1⊥)j (39) where sj = ±1 for positrons and electrons respectively. The total electric field in Eq. (39) is thus proportional to the total track length (Pj sj(~v⊥)jδtj) transverse to the direction of the observer at any frequency ω. This track length is the projected (e − p) track length times sin θc, as described earlier. The coherent electric field emission at different frequencies now depends on the Monte Carlo "discrete form factor" F (ω)MC, given by F (ω)MC = Xj sje−i nω c n·(~r1⊥)j = Xj 31 sje−i nω c xj 1 sin θc. (40) 1 10000 1 TeV 500 GeV 100 GeV N / F 0.1 N / F x q e r f 1000 1 TeV 500 GeV 100 GeV 0.01 0 10000 20000 30000 Frequency (MHz) 40000 50000 100 0 10000 20000 30000 Frequency (MHz) 40000 50000 Figure 21: Absolute value of the form factor (F (ω)) (left plot) and the frequency spectrum (ωF (ω)) (right plot) plots for 1 TeV, 500 GeV and 100 GeV showers. The form factor has been calculated using Eq. (40), where we naively sum over all the shower particles along the z-axis (shower axis). The curves are normalized by dividing by the particle count N . Note that the observation point is in the x − z plane. 6.4 The Discrete Form Factor and the Frequency Spectrum We calculated the discrete form factor in Eq. (40) for 1 TeV, 500 GeV and 100 GeV showers. A factor of ω times the form factor is proportional to the electric field amplitude. First, we naively carried out the sum in Eq. (40) for all the shower particles along the whole shower axis (z) as suggested by the Cherenkov condition in the Eq. (38). The absolute value of the form factor and the frequency spectrum are plotted in Fig. 21. It shows an extended region of coherence, with F ormf actor ∼ N/ω, where N is the number of shower particles. This naive estimate is somewhat misleading because the Cherenkov condition is not satisfied for the whole shower axis. The CP also becomes flat at very high frequencies, as does the TP at the Cherenkov angle (see Fig. 17a). A further complication is statistical fluctuations, which become large where the form factor is small. For a better understanding of the form factor and the frequency spectrum, we now turn to the analytic method. 6.5 The Analytic Form Factor and the Frequency Spectrum The analytic form factor as defined in Eq. (35) is the Fourier transform of the snapshot of the charge distribution. It is a good approximation to assume that most of the electric field contribution comes from the particles at the shower maximum [43]. To calculate the analytic form factor, we then determined the transverse distribution of the particles within half a radiation length on both sides of the shower maximum for a 32 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 / p d N d 0 0 2 4 Fit Data 16 18 20 6 8 14 Radial distance (p) in cm 10 12 Figure 22: Radial distributions dN/dρ of the excess (e − p) electrons within half a radiation length on both sides of the shower maximum for a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers). The solid curve is a Pade(1,3) fit to the excess charge distribution. 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers). We found both the distribution of the total particles dN (e + p)/dρ and the distribution of the excess electrons dN (e − p)/dρ. Here, ρ is the cylindrical radial distance from the shower axis. The excess charge distribution (dN (e − p)/dρ) is plotted in Fig. 22. We observed that the radial distribution falls approximately like 1/ρ2 for large ρ, and peaks at a remarkably small value of 0.5 cm. One way (by no means complete) to understand these results recalls the multiple scattering of an electron by a static Coulomb field. For a screened Coulomb field, the modified Rutherford scattering cross section is given by [39]: dσs dQ βc !2 = 8π Ze2 Q (Q2 + Q2 s)2 (41) where Q is the momentum transfer and Z is the atomic number of the scatterer; Qs = (Z 1/3/192)mc is the momentum transfer associated with the screening radius; m is the mass of the electron. For elastic scattering in the ultra-relativistic limit, Q2 = 2p2(1 − cos θ) ≈ p2θ2, where p is the electron momentum. The cross-section formula in Eq. (41) now takes the form: dσs dθ βc !2 = 8π Ze2 p2θ (p2θ2 + Q2 s)2 . (42) The average deflection angle, < θ >≈ ρ/∆z. We can get a crude estimate of the transverse distribution dN/dρ from Eq. (42) as: dN dρ = 8π Ze2 βc !2 n∆z3 p2 ! ρ (ρ2 + ρ2 o)2 (43) 33 where n is the number density related to N by the formula N = nσ∆z. The peak of this distribution is given by Qs∆z p ρo = . (44) We evaluate this with the average energy of the particles taken to be approximately equal to the critical energy (Ec) at the shower maximum. The peak of the distribution is then ρo = 0.5 cm for ice (Z = 7.2, ∆z = 39 cm and p ∼ Ec = 70 MeV). The excellent agreement may be fortuitous, but gives some confidence that the Monte Carlo excess charge distribution, which also includes numerous atomic collision, pair production and Compton scattering processes, has a simple physical origin. We made a fit to the excess charge distribution with a Pade (1,3) approximation of the form dN/dρ = f (ρ) = n(ρ − a)/(1 + bρ + cρ2 + dρ3) (see Fig. 22). The fitting parameters are: n = 2.15, a = 0.01, b = 4.73, c = 6.96, d = 0.33. The fit is good up to ρ ∼ 20 cm. The choice of the Pade fit was made to preserve the ρ1 geometric zero in dN/dρ at the origin, and the 1/ρ2 asymptotic behavior. Finally, we calculated the analytic form factor using Eq. (35) as: F (ω) = 2πZ ∞ 0 dρ f (ρ) Jo(cid:18) nω c ρ sin θc(cid:19) . (45) For the high frequency end it was necessary to use a convergence procedure to modulate the Bessel transform. We compare the analytic prediction to the discrete form factor of Eq. (40) at the shower maximum for 100 GeV, 500 GeV and 1 TeV showers. The comparison is shown in Fig. 23. For reference we also plotted the analytic and the discrete frequency spectra, which are ω times the absolute value of the form factor. The agreement between the two methods is good up to 10 GHz for all energies and up to 50 GHz for 1 TeV. 6.6 Direct Calculation: Monte Carlo Field Spectrum The frequency spectrum of the electric field calculated using Eqs. (23 & 24) at the Cherenkov angle and an angle off the Cherenkov angle are plotted in Fig. 24a. We calculated the spectrum for 1 TeV, 500 GeV and 100 GeV showers (each averaged over many showers). The electric field amplitude rises linearly at low frequency: this is the lin- ear dependence on ω due to dimensional analysis. The coherent behavior at the Cherenkov angle and the incoherent behavior at a widely separated angle (40◦) are clear. The fre- quency spectrum of the electric field calculated from a 100 GeV GEANT generated shower is compared to the same from the ZHS code in Fig. 24b. From the previous analysis, the frequency dependence of the electric field amplitude is expected to be ωF (ω). We compare ωF (ω) to Eω generated by the Monte Carlo in Fig. 25. The electric field amplitude at the Cherenkov angle is proportional to the projected (e− p) track length × sin θc as shown in Eq. (39). We used the total projected (e− p) track length value of 70 meter (as we found before) for a 100 GeV shower as a pre-factor to normalize the analytic form factor. It is clear from the plot that the analytic form factor and simple dimensional considerations explain the electric field amplitude rather well up through 5-15 GHz range. The coherence persists up to frequencies as high as 50 GHz. We 34 1 0.1 N / F 0.01 0.001 Analytic 1 TeV 500 GeV 100 GeV 10000 N / F x q e r f 1000 Analytic 1 TeV 500 GeV 100 GeV 0.0001 0 10000 20000 30000 Frequency (MHz) 40000 50000 100 0 10000 20000 30000 Frequency (MHz) 40000 50000 Figure 23: Absolute value of the form factor F (ω) (left) and the frequency spectrum ωF (ω) (right) plotted versus frequency for 1 TeV, 500 GeV and 100 GeV showers. The discrete form factor has been calculated using Eq. (40), where we sum over all the particles within a radiation length at the shower maximum. The analytic form factor has been calculated from the Fourier transform to a fit to the excess charge distribution (see Fig. 22). Both curves are normalized by dividing by the particle count N Note that the analytic curve tends to be lower than the numerical calculation at high frequency. notice that the agreement between the direct Monte Carlo calculation of the frequency spectrum and the analytic frequency spectrum gets better with increasing shower energy. We believe that the analysis captures the important physics of the processes, and validates the results of the Monte Carlo. 6.7 Related Issues Electrons and positrons undergo Coulomb scattering while traversing through the medium. The particle track is therefore not a straight line from the point of its creation to the point where it falls below threshold. The track contains many kinks due to elastic Coulomb scattering. GEANT gives a detailed output of particle tracks which contain these kinks as stated earlier; we calculate the electric field from step-tracks. The Monte Carlo developed by ZHS, on the other hand used the straight tracks from the start points to the end points, with timing correction, to calculate field [9] to simplify their calculation. We studied the effect of these kinks and also the effect of taking all tracks along the shower axis (see Fig. 26). We found little difference between the cases when we included (the usual case) and not included the kinks. This is a result of the extended coherence zone along the shower axis at the Cherenkov angle. When we calculated the electric field taking only the components parallel to the shower axis, we found that the field increases almost linearly with frequency, as expected from a single charge. For practical purposes, particles are removed from the Monte Carlo simulation once 35 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 V e G 0 0 1 / ) z H M V u ( / o E / E x R 100 GeV-C 500 GeV-C 1 TeV-C 100 GeV-40 500 GeV-40 1 TeV-40 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 ) z H M V u ( / E x R GEANT ZHS Eo = 100 GeV 0 0 2000 4000 6000 Frequency (MHz) 8000 10000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Frequency (MHz) Figure 24: Direct Monte Carlo calculation of the frequency spectrum of the electric field mag- nitude for 1 TeV, 500 GeV and 100 GeV showers (left). The calculation is done using Eqs. (23 & 24) at the Cherenkov angle and at 40◦ angle. The coherent behavior at the Cherenkov angle and the incoherent behavior at the 40◦ viewing angle are clear. The frequency spectrum at the Cherenkov angle for a 100 GeV shower is also compared to the same calculated using ZHS code (right). All thresholds are 0.611 MeV and the averages are done with 50 showers in case of 100 GeV, 20 showers in case of 500 GeV and 10 showers in case of 1 TeV. V e G 0 0 1 / / ) z H M V u ( o E / E x R 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0 Analytic 100 GeV 500 GeV 1 TeV 10000 20000 30000 Frequency (MHz) 40000 50000 Figure 25: Comparison between the frequency spectra of the electric field magnitude at the Cherenkov angle from direct Monte Carlo calculation and from analytic calculation. The analytic calculation is done using Eq. (40) with the total projected track length of 70 m for a 100 GeV shower as found before. 36 ) z H M V u ( / E x R 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 parallel with kinks no kinks 2000 4000 6000 Frequency (MHz) 8000 10000 Figure 26: Frequency spectrum of the electric field magnitude at the Cherenkov angle for a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers). Our study shows that the electric field calculated using particle tracks with and without kinks make little difference. The electric field magnitude, on the other hand increases almost linearly with frequency like a single charge when we took the component of the tracks parallel to the shower axis only. they fall below certain threshold energy (0.611 MeV in our case). While physical particles do not suddenly stop moving, simulated particles in the Monte Carlo, have potential emission of stopping radiation. Even though high energy particles are almost parallel to the shower axis, the low energy particles close to threshold are isotropic. The stopping radiation (which is forward) from all these isotropic particles in general could cause a problem if they are aligned with the observer on the Cherenkov cone. Our study shows (see Fig. 27) that there is indeed an isotropic component in the shower below energy 0.85 MeV. However, they do not contribute to the radiation at the Cherenkov angle (θc ≈ 55.8◦). Particles with energy 1 MeV, for example, Cherenkov radiates at an angle 49◦. 6.8 Angular Pulse Distribution The angular distribution of the electric field amplitude peaks at the Cherenkov angle (θc ≈ 55.8◦). Fig. 28 shows the 1 GHz pulse from a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) with 0.611 MeV total energy threshold at 4 different azimuthal angles φ = 90◦, 180◦, 270◦ and 360◦. The pulse shows very little dependence on φ which corresponds to the approximately symmetric distribution of particles about the shower axis as stated earlier. We have also plotted the electric field amplitude from the ZHS Monte Carlo for a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) at 1 GHz frequency in Fig. 28 for comparison. Fig. 29 shows the angular pulse distribution for a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) at 1 GHz, 750 MHz, 500 MHz and 250 MHz frequencies. The Gaussian half 37 Figure 27: Plot of the cosine of the polar angle (θ) of each track-segment with respect to the shower-axis versus its total energy. Although high energy particles are very much aligned with the shower axis, there is an isotropic low energy component which moves with the shower. The isotropic component of the shower does not contribute to the Cherenkov pulse, which validates the removal of the particles when they fall below a certain low-energy threshold, say 0.611 MeV. 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 ) z H M V u ( / E x R 0 20 30 GEANT 90 GEANT 180 GEANT 270 GEANT 360 ZHS 40 50 Observation Angle (Degrees) 60 70 80 90 Figure 28: Angular pulse distribution of a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) with 0.611 MeV total energy threshold from GEANT. The pulse is calculated at 1 GHz frequency and at 4 different azimuthal angles (φ). The Cherenkov peak at the observation angle θ = θc shows very little dependence on φ. The same pulse from the ZHS Monte Carlo is also plotted for comparison. 38 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 ) z H M V u ( / E x R 0 20 30 1 GHz 750 MHz 500 MHz 250 MHz 40 50 Observation Angle (Degrees) 60 70 80 90 Figure 29: Angular pulse distribution of a 100 GeV shower (averaged over 50 showers) with 0.611 MeV total energy threshold from GEANT. The pulse is calculated at frequencies: 1 GHz, 750 MHz, 500 MHz and 250 MHz. The plot shows inverse scaling of Gaussian half width of the Cherenkov pulse with frequency. width of the pulses are 2.0◦, 3.7◦ and 7.3◦ at 1 GHz, 500 MHz and 250 MHz frequencies re- spectively. This corresponds to approximate inverse scaling of pulse width with frequency which is analogous to a single-slit diffraction pattern as pointed out in reference [9]. 7 Summary of Results and Conclusions We have analyzed 100 GeV - 1 TeV electromagnetic showers and the radio frequency radi- ation they produce in great detail. These studies are a necessary ingredient for designing an experiment for radio detection of UHE cosmic ray induced showers in radio- transpar- ent media. In particular, experiments to detect radio emission from showers induced by high energy cosmic ray neutrinos interacting in the surface of the moon [45] and in the South Polar ice-cap [46] are underway and have reported preliminary results. Coherent radio emission from electromagnetic showers has recently been demonstrated in the labo- ratory [12]. The technique is gaining recognition as a powerful tool for particle detection. The thorough dissection and understanding of all the intricacies of the showers and their relationships to the final radio pulse produced is our goal achieved in this paper. Energy information for each stage of every track is readily available from the GEANT shower code. This information is essential for tracking the energy distribution in the shower and identifying the sources of radio emission. Among our results, is the direct determination of the radiation length in ice from an exponential fit to bremsstrahlung radiation energy loss as a function of depth in Sec. 3.1. When this information is combined with the direct extraction of the ionization loss, Sec. 3.3, we determined the critical energy 39 from the data shown in Fig. 5. The value obtained is nicely consistent with that found by using the Moliere radius extracted from the data for the radial energy flow, Sec. 3.2, in combination with the radiation length. The consistency between the critical energy values indicates that our application of the code and analysis of the data gives a correct physical picture of the interplay among the competing processes in the shower as it develops. Because the coherent radio emission of interest depends upon the charge excess in the shower, we need the energy profile of the contributions to the charge excess. This again requires the GEANT track-by-track energy information, and we show the total charge imbalance broken down into energy ranges in Fig. 12. A large fraction, more than 50%, of the imbalance comes from the energy range below 5 MeV. Though the track lengths are small, the large number of particles leads to a significant contribution to the total track length of the shower. The total and projected track lengths for both the total and excess charge populations are determined and shown to be proportional to total shower energy in Sec. 3.5. The total track length is comfortably below a rough estimate of the upper bound for the total track length. Our detailed study of the longitudinal profiles in iron shows overall agreement but differences in detail among the GEANT, the EGS4 and the ZHS simulations in Fig. 8. The profiles in ice for 100 GeV, 500 GeV and 1 TeV electron and photon induced showers in ice are well described by a modified Greisen parametrization with critical energy value extracted from the simulation data, as described above, and two fit parameters. The confidence levels of the fits are typically 80% - 90%, as summarized in Tables 1 & 2. The GEANT profiles in ice are qualitatively similar to those from the ZHS code, but lie typically 25% - 35% lower. To determine whether small differences in cross section values used in the different simulations could account for this difference, we developed a 1-dimensional shower code with the full set of cross sections for the relevant processes. As we report in Sec. 3.7, the depth at maximum and the number of particles at maximum are rather insensitive to changes in the cross sections. We therefore believe that the differences in cross-sections are not the source of profile and total track length differences between our simulation and that of ZHS. Unfortunately, one important check that we have not been able to make is the GEANT vs. ZHS ionization energy loss (dE/dx). The ZHS code does not admit a readout of energy loss by shower particles. Therefore, we were unable to make from ZHS code plots similar to Figs. 3 & 4 we made with GEANT. If the ionization loss in ZHS code is much lower than in GEANT, it might account for the difference between showers produced by the two Monte Carlos. We develop the framework to calculate the electric field in the 100 MHz to multi GHz frequency range in Sec. 5. The track-by-track field calculation, applicable in the Fraunhoffer zone, and the calculation treating the shower as a continuous current density, applicable in the Fraunhoffer and and Fresnel zones, complement each other. We present both for this reason. The direct, numerical calculation of the total field from the vector sum of the fields from individual tracks allows a detailed study of the dependence on to- tal track length. Moreover, we elucidate the effects of random direction changes due to collisions and the pattern of phase relationships among the contributions from all tracks. Complementing these intensive numerical calculations, we present analytic work that em- ploys the form factor of the effective current density to calculate the field in both Fresnel 40 and Fraunhoffer regimes. Given our realistic model for the current density, which we fit to the transverse charge distribution from the simulation, we show the remarkable result that the radiation from the shower is coherent over the whole shower at the Cherenkov angle in the Fraunhoffer limit. Our study of the track-by-track phase coherence in Sec. 6 reveals that the phase associated with the initial time and position of a track (TP) and the phase associated with the "diffractive emission" (CP) from the track as a whole are uncorrelated. This result supports our model of the current, and consequently of the field, in Sec. 5. Figs. 17 & 18 show the strong phase peaking of the "diffractive" phase, called Cherenkov phase (CP) in the discussion, on and off the Cherenkov angle as defined by the shower axis. The phase associated with the initial coordinates of the track, called the translation phase (TP), is coherent at the Cherenkov angle but completely random away from that angle. We noticed some time ago [47] that the frequency spectrum of the electric field at the Cherenkov angle, calculated directly from the track data and the Fraunhoffer zone formulas developed in Sec. 5., flattens out at frequencies above 2 GHz, as shown in Fig. 24. It is clear from the figure that the ZHS simulation shows the same behavior but they did not examine the high frequency region further [9]. We employ the form factor, which correctly accounts for the transverse spread of the shower and its effect on the field to analyze the frequency spectrum. We evaluate its Fourier transform, F (ω), two independent ways and find agreement. We then show that the observed spectrum of the field is faithfully represented up to 5 GHz for 100 GeV showers and up to 15 GHz for 500 GeV and 1 TeV showers. Up to 15 GHz, we now have a clear picture of the behavior of the frequency spectrum, which continues to show coherent behavior. The electric field in the Fraunhoffer zone as a function of the observation angle from the shower axis peaks at the Cherenkov angle. The width of the peak shrinks inversely with frequency and the height (field strength) rises linearly with shower energy. These features confirm the ZHS results and the off-Cherenkov angular dependence is also similar. The height of the peak at the Cherenkov angle for a given energy and frequency is larger in their case by about 25-35%. This is perhaps not a surprising difference between two independent shower simulations and field calculations. We have performed an extensive set of tests and cross-checks to validate our results. 7.1 Conclusions Our study quantifies coherent Cherenkov radiation from high energy showers and shows that coherence persists from 100 MHz to tens of GHz. The existence of Coherent Cherenkov radiation goes back to Askaryan, and has been studied for decades, while the persistence of coherent emission at the Cherenkov angle at multi-GHz frequencies is new. The persis- tence of coherence is established by our new, highly detailed study of the actual shower currents and corresponding phase distributions in CP and TP introduced in Sec. 6. The recognition that the TP is coherent over the whole length of the shower at the Cherenkov angle is a new insight into the connection between shower particles and the fields they produce. We have analyzed the electromagnetic shower characteristics in great detail, including the energy distributions and energy losses, so that a complete set of shower 41 parameters can be extracted from the simulation data to confirm and cross check the con- sistency of our picture. A grand summary of pertinent parameters and comparisons with the ZHS and other sources where available is presented in Table 5. GEANT Table 5: Comparisons between 100 GeV showers in ice from GEANT and from ZHS Monte Carlos Parameter Total Energy Threshold (MeV) Total absolute track length (meter) Total projected (e + p) track length (meter) Total projected (e − p) track length (meter) Position of the shower max. (radiation length) Number of particles (e + p) at shower max. Excess electrons (e − p) at shower max. Fractional charge excess at the shower max Cherenkov peak at 1 GHz (Volts/MHz) 0.611 399 ± 5 374 ± 4 70 ± 8 6.5 111 ± 7 20 ± 2 ∼ 18% 7.5 × 10−9 ZHS 0.611 642 519 131 7.0 155 ± 10 37 ± 3 ∼ 24% 1.0 × 10−8 The simulation and field calculation developed are directly applicable to energies up to 1 TeV. Higher energy showers can be "bootstrapped" by evolving the shower particles into this regime with a corresponding multiplication in particle number and emitted field intensity. We intend to parametrize and extrapolate the data to the multi-PeV data needed for the UHE showers relevant to the RICE experiment. With the GEANT base, it will also be interesting to investigate similar shower and field calculation for the hadronic component of neutrino-induced showers. Acknowledgement Help and advice from Enrique Zas at various stages of this work were invaluable. Discus- sions and working sessions with Jaime Alvarez-Muniz were essential to our understanding of the workings of the ZHS code. We thank George Frichter and Florian Hardt for early diagnostic works using the ZHS code. Comments and questions from Frances Halzen on this topic over many years have been most useful. Thanks to Tim Bolton for helping with initial set up of the GEANT Monte Carlo code. This work is supported in part by the NSF, the DOE, the University of Kansas General Research Fund, the RESEARCH COR- PORATION and the facilities of the Kansas Institute for Theoretical and Computational Science. References [1] G. A. Askar'yan. Sov. Phys., JETP14:441, 1962. [2] M. A. Markov and I. M. Zheleznykh. Nucl. Inst. Meth., A248:242, 1986. [3] A. L. Provorov and I. M. Zheleznykh. Astropart. Phys., 4:55, 1995. 42 [4] J. P. Ralston and D. W. McKay, in Arkansas Gamma Ray and Neutrino Workshop: 1989, edited by G. B. Yodh, D. C. Wold, and W. R. Kropp, Nuc. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 14A 356 (1990); reprinted in Proceedings of the Bartol Workshop on Cosmic Rays and Astrophysics at the South Pole (AIP, NY 1990) Proceedings #198. [5] S. W. Stecker and M. H. Solomon. Space Sci. Rev., 75:341, 1996. [6] F. Halzen and E. Zas. astrophys. J., 488:669, 1997. [7] J. Rachen, R. Protheroe, and K. Mannheim. astro-ph/99080301, 1999. [8] G. Frichter, D. W. McKay, and J. P. Ralston. Phys. Rev., D53:1684, 1996. [9] E. Zas, F. Halzen, and T. Stanev. Phys. Rev., D45:362, 1992. [10] P. B. Price. Astropart. Phys., 5:43, 1996. [11] RICE Collaboration. Proceedings of the ICRC 1997. astro-ph/9709223. [12] D. Saltzberg et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:2802, 2001. [13] CERN Publication. GEANT-Detector Description and Simulation Tool, 1994. [14] L. D. Landau and I. J. Pomeranchuk. Dokl. Akad. Nauk., 92:535, 1953. [15] L. D. Landau and I. J. Pomeranchuk. Dokl. Akad. Nauk., 92:735, 1953. [16] H. Messel and D. F. Crawford. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1970. [17] A. B. Migdal. Phys. Rev., 103:1811, 1956. [18] A. Misaki. Phys. Rev., D40:3086, 1989. [19] J. P. Ralston and D. W. McKay, in High Energy Gamma Ray Astronomy (Ann Arbor 1990), APS Conference Proceedings No. 220 (AIP, NY, 1991) edited by J. Matthews. [20] J. Alvarez-Muniz and E. Zas. Phys. Lett., B411:218, 1997. [21] for air shower applications of radio-detection, see: H. R. Allan, Progress in Elementary Particles and Cosmic Ray Physics, North-Holland, 1971. J. L. Rosner and J. F. Wilkerson, hep-ex/9702008. J. L. Rosner, hep-ex/9508011. J. L. Rosner, in First International Workshop on Radio Detection of High Energy Particles, RADHEP 2000 (Los Angeles), AIP Conference Proceedings No. 579 (2001) edited by D. Saltzberg and P. Gorham. [22] H. Bethe and W. Heitler. Proc. Roy. Soc., A146:83, 1934. [23] H. Bethe. Z. Phys., 5:325, 1930. [24] F. Bloch. Ann. Phys., 16:285, 1933. 43 [25] B. Rossi. High Energy Particles. Prentice Hall, 1952. [26] W. Heitler. The Quantum Theory of Radiation. Clarendon, 1954. [27] J. F. Carlson and J. R. Oppenheimer. Phys. Rev., 51:220, 1937. [28] L. D. Landau and G. Rumer. Proc. Roy. Soc., A166:213, 1938. [29] T. K. Gaisser. Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1990. [30] K. Greisen. Prog. Cosmic Ray Physics, 3:1, 1956. [31] A. M. Hillas. J. Phys., G8:1461, 1982. [32] E. Fenyves, S. Balog, N. Davis, D. Suson, and T. Stanev. Phys. Rev., D37:649, 1988. [33] J. Nishimura. Handbuch der Physik, 1967. [34] W. R. Nelson et al. Phys. Rev., 149:201, 1966. [35] G. Bathow et al. Nucl. Phys., B20:592, 1970. [36] O. I. Dovzhenko and A. A. Pomanskii. Sov. Phys. JETP, 18:187, 1964. [37] Particle Data Group. The European Physical Journal, C15, 2000. The details of EGS4 code system can be found in the report by W.R. Nelson, H. Hirayama and D.W.O. Rogers, SLAC-265, 1985. [38] G. Grindhammer et al., at SSC Workshop on Calorimetry for the Supercollider (Tuscaloosa, 1989). SLAC-PUB-5072. [39] J. D. Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley, 1975. [40] Fracis E. Low. Classical Field Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997. [41] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz. The Classical Theory of Fields. Pergamon Press, 1971. [42] Florian Hardt. Unpublished, 1998. [43] R. V. Buniy and J. P. Ralston. astro-ph/0003408, 2000. [44] B. Rossi and K. Greisen. Revs. Mod. Phys., 13:240, 1941. [45] P. W. Gorham et. al., in First International Workshop on Radio Detection of High Energy Particles, RADHEP 2000 (Los Angeles), AIP Conference Proceedings No. 579 (2001) edited by D. Saltzberg and P. Gorham. [46] D. Besson, in First International Workshop on Radio Detection of High Energy Par- ticles, RADHEP 2000 (Los Angeles), AIP Conference Proceedings No. 579 (2001) edited by D. Saltzberg and P. Gorham. 44 [47] S. Razzaque. Talk given at Phenomenology for the Nu Century, PHENO 2000 (Madi- son) and at First International Workshop on Radio Detection of High Energy Parti- cles, RADHEP 2000 (Los Angeles). 45
0811.0704	1	0811	2008-11-05T11:59:12	Trigonometric Parallaxes of Massive Star Forming Regions: IV. G35.20-0.74 and G35.20-1.74	[ "astro-ph" ]	We report trigonometric parallaxes for the high-mass star forming regions G35.20-0.74 and G35.20-1.74, corresponding to distances of 2.19 (+0.24 -0.20) kpc and 3.27 (+0.56 -0.42) kpc, respectively. The distances to both sources are close to their near kinematic distances and place them in the Carina-Sagittarius spiral arm. Combining the distances and proper motions with observed radial velocities gives the locations and full space motions of the star forming regions. Assuming a standard model of the Galaxy, G35.20-0.74 and G35.20-1.74 have peculiar motions of ~13 km/s and ~16 km/s counter to Galactic rotation and ~9 km/s toward the North Galactic Pole.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Trigonometric Parallaxes of Massive Star Forming Regions: IV. G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74 B. Zhang1,5, X. W. Zheng1, M. J. Reid2, K. M. Menten3, Y. Xu3,6, L. Moscadelli4, A. Brunthaler3 Version: 2008 Oct 29 ABSTRACT for the high-mass star We report trigonometric parallaxes forming regions G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74, corresponding to distances of 2.19+0.24 −0.20 kpc and 3.27+0.56 −0.42 kpc, respectively. The distances to both sources are close to their near kine- matic distances and place them in the Carina-Sagittarius spiral arm. Combining the distances and proper motions with observed radial velocities gives the locations and full space motions of the star forming regions. Assuming a standard model of the Galaxy, G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74 have peculiar motions of ≈ 13 km s−1 and ≈ 16 km s−1 counter to Galactic rotation and ≈ 9 km s−1 toward the North Galactic Pole. Subject headings: -- distances -- individual (G35.20−0.74, G35.20−1.74) techniques: interferometric -- astrometry -- spiral arm: Sagittarius 1. Introduction G35.20−0.74 (IRAS 18556+0136) and G35.20−1.74 (IRAS 18592+0108) are high-mass star forming regions. They both are home to strong methanol (CH3OH) masers at 12 GHz and were selected as targets for our large project with the NRAO 1 Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) to study the spiral structure and kinematics of the Milky Way. Details of this project are discussed in Reid et al. (2009), hereafter called Paper I. 1Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China 2Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3Max-Plank-Institut fur Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany 4INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy 5Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China 6Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China 1The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc -- 2 -- The kinematic distance of G35.20−0.74 is about 3.3 kpc, based a CO line velocity of 35 km s−1 (Solomon et al. 1987). This star forming region is home to a massive protostar with a jet driven outflow, rarely observed towards massive young stellar objects. Sub-arcsecond resolution VLA observations of the region by Gibb et al. (2003) at 3.5 and 6.0 cm show that three concentrations of radio continuum emission break up into 11 individual sources all lying along the outflow. As for most high-mass star forming regions, G35.20−0.74 contains water and OH masers (Forster & Caswell 1989), methanol masers (Caswell et al. 1995), and many thermal lines from molecules like CH3CN (Kalenskii et al. 2000), HCO+ and HCN (Gibb et al. 2003) have been detected. This region was also observed recently at mid-infrared wavelengths by De Buizer et al. (2006). These observations reveal an extended source with a cometary shape with the masers concentrated around the head. The G35.20−1.74 star forming region also contains water, OH and methanol masers, and a large cometary UCHII region. The UCHII region, known as W48A, lies about 20′′ from the water and OH masers. Mid-infrared images (De Buizer et al. 2004) show a bright point source at the location of the water masers as well as the UCHII region to the south-east. Kinematic distances to G35.20−1.74, from various molecular lines associated with W48A (Genzel & Downes 1977; Palagi et al. 1993; Churwell et al. 1990; Braz & Epchtein 1983; Vallee & MacLeod 1990), range between 3.0 and 3.4 kpc. Starting at the Sun, a ray toward Galactic longitude 35◦ first crosses the Carina -- Sagittarius spiral arm, then the Crux -- Scutum arm, before recrossing the Carina -- Sagittarius arm and then crossing the Perseus arm. Thus distances are crucial to establish to which arm G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74 belong. Given the large kinematic anomalies measured for some massive star forming regions, for example for W3OH (Xu et al. 2006a; Hachisuka et al. 2006), it is important to measure distances to these and other sources by direct methods such as trigonometric parallax. 2. Observations and Calibration Procedures On 2005 October 30, 2006 April 7 and October 7, and 2007 April 16, we observed methanol masers at 12 GHz toward G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74 with 8-hour tracks on the VLBA. Since, for these sources, the declination parallax signature is considerably smaller than for right ascension, we scheduled the observations so as to maximize the right ascension parallax offsets. We observed several extragalactic radio sources as background references which provide independent checks for parallax solutions. Table 1 lists the positions, intensities, source separations, observed radial velocities and beam sizes. -- 3 -- Table 1: Positions and Brightnesses Source R.A. (J2000) Dec. (J2000) Tb (h m s) ′ (◦ ′′) G35.20−0.74... J1855+0215... J1855+0251... J1907+0127... 18 58 13.0517 +01 40 35.674 18 55 00.1130 +02 15 41.100 18 55 35.4365 +02 51 19.562 19 07 11.9963 +01 27 08.963 G35.20−1.74... J1903+0145... J1904+0110... J1907+0127... J1855+0251... 19 01 45.5364 +01 13 32.545 19 03 53.0632 +01 45 26.306 19 04 26.3978 +01 10 36.696 19 07 11.9963 +01 27 08.963 18 55 35.4365 +02 51 19.562 (Jy/b) 0.7 − 0.9 0.03 0.20 0.10 3.5 − 9.5 0.18 0.33 0.30 0.50 θsep P.A. (◦) (◦) ... ... 1.0 −54 1.4 −29 2.3 +96 ... ... 0.8 +45 0.7 +94 1.4 +80 2.2 −43 VLSR (km s−1) Beam (mas) 31 ... ... ... 43 ... ... ... ... 1.2 ... ... ... 1.2 ... ... ... ... Note. -- The fourth and fifth columns give the peak brightnesses (Tb) at 12 GHz and their separations (θsep) and position angles (P.A.) east of north between maser and reference sources. The sixth column gives the Local Standard of Rest (LSR) velocities of the masers. The last column gives the FWHM size of the Gaussian restoring beam. Calibrators J1855+0251 (Fomalont et al. 2003) and J1907+0127 (Petrov et al. 2005) are from the VLBA Calibrator Survey, the other calibrators are from Xu et al. (2006b). Our general observing setups and calibration procedures are described in Paper I, and here we discuss only aspects of the observations that are specific to G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74. We observed two ICRF sources, J1800+3848 and J1800+7828 (Ma et al. 1998), near the beginning, middle and end of the observations in order to monitor delay and electronic phase differences among the observing bands. The right and left-circularly polarized emission from the 12 GHz methanol masers toward G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74 were observed in 4 MHz bands centered at LSR velocities of 31 km s−1 and 43 km s−1, respectively. The strongest maser spots at VLSR of 28.3 km s−1 and 41.5 km s−1 served as the phase- references for G35.20−0.74 and G35.20−1.74, respectively. The point-source response functions (dirty beams) had FWHMs of 1.9 by 0.8 mas at a PA of −8◦ east of north. After experimenting with different restoring beams, we adopted a circular restoring beam with a 1.2 mas FWHM for both maser sources and background sources. Figures 1 and 2 show radio continuum (from VLA archive data) and velocity-integrated methanol maser emission from these star-forming regions. -- 4 -- Fig. 1. -- Images of 4.9 GHz radio continuum emission associated with the star-forming region G35.20−0.74, generated from archival VLA data (program AH241), and the velocity-integrated maser emission (inset). The position of the methanol masers is designated with a plus (+) sign. Contour levels are linearly spaced at 0.45 mJy for the continuum emission; they start at 0.06 Jy beam−1 km s−1 and increase by factors of 2 for the maser emission. -- 5 -- Fig. 2. -- Images of 8.4 GHz radio continuum emission associated with the star-forming region G35.20−1.74, generated from archival VLA data (program AK477), and the velocity-integrated maser emission (inset). The position of the methanol masers are shown as a plus (+) sign. Contour levels start at 66 mJy beam−1 and increase by factors of 2 for the continuum emission; they start at 0.27 Jy beam−1 km s−1 and increase by factors of 2 for the maser emission. 3. Parallax and Proper Motion Results We fitted elliptical Gaussian brightness distributions to strong maser spots and the extragalac- tic radio sources for all four epochs. The change in position of each maser spot relative to each background radio source was modeled by the parallax sinusoid in both coordinates, determined by one parameter (the parallax), and a secular proper motion in each coordinate. 3.1. G35.20−0.74 Fig. 3 shows maser reference channel images for G35.20−0.74 from the first and last epochs. Imaging sources near zero declination is generally problematic for radio interferometers, and we suspect that the low-level symmetric structures seen in the G35.20−0.74 images are caused by -- 6 -- small calibration errors. However, since the parallax measurement comes almost exclusively from the East-West data, this should not be significant problem. Keeping this in mind, one can see that the emission appears dominated by a single compact component, and there is no significant variation over the 1.5 year time span of our observations. One of the three background sources (J1855+0215) proved to be very weak, and we used only J1855+0251 and J1907+0127 in the parallax fits. Fig. 4 provides the images of background radio sources used for the fitting of parallax and proper motion for G35.20−0.74. Fig. 3. -- Images of reference maser source at VLSR = 28.3 km s−1 in G35.20−0.74 at the first and last epoch. Observation dates are indicated in the upper left corner of each panel. The restoring beam is in the lower left corner. Contour levels are spaced linearly at 90 mJy beam−1 . -- 7 -- Fig. 4. -- Images of extragalactic radio sources used for the parallax measurements of G35.20−0.74 from the first epoch observation on 2005 Oct 30. Source names are in the upper left corner of each panel. Contour levels are spaced linearly at 7.0 mJy beam−1 for J1855+0251 and 10.0 mJy beam−1 for J1907+0127. -- 8 -- Fig. 5. -- Parallax and proper motion data and best-fitting models for G35.20−0.74. Filled and opened markers are for maser spots at VLSR of 27.9 km s−1 and 27.5 km s−1, respectively. Plotted are positions of both maser spots relative to the two extragalactic radio sources: J1855+0251 (triangles) and J1907+0127 (squares). Left Panel: Positions with superposed curves representing the modeled maser track on the sky with the first and last epochs labeled. The expected positions from the parallax and proper motion fit are indicated (crosses). Middle Panel: Eastward (solid lines) and northward (dashed lines) offsets and best-fitting models versus time. Data for the eastward and northward positions are offset vertically and small time shifts have been added to the data for clarity. Right Panel: Same as the middle panel, except the best-fitting proper motions have been removed, allowing all data to be overlaid and the effects of only the parallax seen. The solid (dashed) line shows the combined fitted eastward (northward) parallax curve. -- 9 -- Table 2: G35.20−0.74 Parallax & Proper Motion Fits Maser VLSR Background Parallax µx µy (km s−1) 27.9 ... 27.9 ... 27.5 ... 27.5 ... 27.9 ... 27.5 ... Source J1855+0251 J1907+0127 J1855+0251 J1907+0127 (mas) (mas y−1) (mas y−1) 0.411 ± 0.057 −0.07 ± 0.10 −4.50 ± 0.33 0.426 ± 0.037 −0.05 ± 0.06 −4.47 ± 0.10 0.506 ± 0.083 −0.37 ± 0.14 −2.83 ± 0.27 0.522 ± 0.094 −0.35 ± 0.16 −2.80 ± 0.25 combined 0.456 ± 0.045 −0.07 ± 0.08 −4.47 ± 0.16 −0.29 ± 0.08 −2.79 ± 0.16 Note. -- Combined fit used a single parallax parameter for both maser spots relative to the background sources, but a different proper motion was allowed for the two maser spots to allow for internal maser motions. Uncertainties are formal errors adjusted to give χ2 per degree of freedom of unity, except for the "combined" parallax uncertainty which has been increased to allow for the difference between the parallaxes of the two maser spots. In order to measure the parallax and proper motion of G35.20−0.74, we fitted the two brightest maser spots, at VLSR = 27.9 and 27.5 km s−1, and the two background radio sources, J1855+0251 and J1907+0127, for all four epochs. In Fig. 5, we plot the positions of these two maser spots relative to the two background radio sources, with superposed curves representing the model maser tracks across the sky. The fitting results, listed in Table 2, reveal that the individually measured parallaxes and proper motions for two maser spots in G35.20−0.74 are somewhat different. However, the results using the two background sources are reasonably consistent. This suggests that time variable maser structure in one or both spots, and not atmospheric calibration, may limit the parallax accuracy. Thus, we have increased the parallax uncertainty for the "combined" solution to half the average difference between the fits for the two maser spots. The combined parallax of the two astrometric maser spots is 0.456 ± 0.045 mas, corresponding to a distance of 2.19+0.24 −0.20 kpc. The average proper motion of the two maser spots is −0.18 ± 0.06 mas y−1 toward the East and −3.63 ± 0.11 mas y−1 toward the North. The difference in the northward proper motions of the two maser spots of ±1.7 mas y−1 (±18 km s−1) is unusually large compared to other sources given in Papers I -- V (Reid et al. 2009; Moscadelli et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2009; Brunthaler et al. 2009). While such an internal motion is not impossible, we suspect that the difference may be a result of the poor north-south beam of the interferometer for this near zero Declination source. At the distance implied by the parallax measurement, the average proper motions correspond to −1.9 km s−1 and −37.7 km s−1 eastward and northward, respectively. Completing the 3-D space velocity, the average LSR velocity of the spots is 27.7 km s−1, which corresponds to a heliocentric radial velocity of 10.7 km s−1. -- 10 -- 3.2. G35.20−1.74 Figure 6 displays images of the maser reference channel for G35.20−1.74 from the first and last epoch. The emission appears dominated by a single compact component, and there is no significant variation over the 1.5 years spanned by our observations. In Fig. 7, we show images of the four background radio sources at the first epoch. We fitted two-dimensional Gaussian brightness distributions to the four background radio sources and the two brightest maser spots at VLSR = 41.9 km s−1 and 41.5 km s−1. In Fig. 8, we plot the positions of these maser spots relative to the two background radio sources with superposed curves representing the model maser tracks across the sky. Our parallax estimates, given in Table 3, for three of the four background sources are consistent for an individual maser spot. The parallax estimate using J1903+0145 differs from the others by about 2-sigma, but gives the smallest post-fit residuals. Given the limited number of degrees of freedom for the fits, it is unclear whether the data for this background source is worse than for the other three background sources and has a fortuitously good fit, or if it is the best data and the data for the other three sources agree fortuitously well. Rather than make this decision, we use the data from all four background sources. The difference in parallax between the two maser spots is roughly 0.10 mas. The scatter among the 4 measures for each spot suggests an uncertainty of about 0.03 mas, the joint error in the difference would be about 0.04 mas. So the discrepancy is just over 2-sigma. Changes in maser structure might be a possible cause. The 41.9 and 41.5 km s−1 masers varied by 3 and 6 Jy over the 4 epochs. However, with our limited data we cannot really evaluate which maser gives a better parallax. So we have used both and conservatively expanded the parallax uncertainty to half the difference between the individual values. We adopt the "combined" parallax solution, which uses both maser spots and the four back- ground sources, which gives a parallax for G35.20−1.74 of 0.306 ± 0.045 mas. As done for source G35.20−0.74, we do not use the formal parallax uncertainty of ±0.015 mas, but instead conser- vatively adopt a parallax uncertainty of ±0.045 mas, which allows for the larger than expected difference in parallax estimates from the two maser spots. The parallax for G35.20−1.74 corre- sponds to a distance of 3.27+0.56 −0.42 kpc. The proper motion estimates for the two maser spots and for all four background sources appear consistent within their joint uncertainties and the average proper motion is −0.71 ± 0.05 mas y−1 toward the East and −3.61±0.17 mas y−1 toward the North. For the measured parallax, the proper motion corresponds to −11.0 km s−1 and −56.0 km s−1 eastward and northward, respectively. The average LSR velocity of the spots is 41.7 km s−1, which corresponds to a heliocentric radial velocity of 24.8 km s−1. -- 11 -- Fig. 6. -- Images of reference maser source at VLSR = 41.5 km s−1 in G35.20−1.74 at the first and last epochs. The epochs are indicated in the upper left corner of each panel. The restoring beam is in the lower left corner. Contour levels are spaced linearly at 1.2 and 1.5 Jy/beam, respectively. -- 12 -- Fig. 7. -- Images of background continuum sources used for the parallax measurements of G35.20−1.74 at the first epoch. Source names are in the upper left corner and restoring beams are in the lower left corner of each panel. Contour levels are spaced linearly at increments of 8.5 mJy beam−1 for J1855+0251, 9.5 mJy beam−1 for J1903+0145, and 15 mJy beam−1 for J1904+0110 and J1907+0127. -- 13 -- Fig. 8. -- Parallax and proper motion data and fits for G35.20−1.74. Filled and opened markers are for maser spot at VLSR of 41.9 km s−1 and 41.5 km s−1, respectively. Plotted are position measurements of both maser spots relative to the four background sources: J1855+0251 (circles), J1903+0145 (triangles), J1904+0110 (squares), J1907+0127 (hexagons). Left Panel: Positions on the sky with the first and last epochs labeled. Data for the maser spot are offset horizontally for clarity. The expected positions from the parallax and proper motion fit are indicated (crosses). Middle Panel: Eastward (solid lines) and northward (dashed lines) positions and best fitting models versus time. Data for the eastward and northward positions are offset vertically and small time shifts have been added to the data for clarity. Right Panel: Same as the middle panel, except the best fit proper motions have been removed, allowing all data to be overlaid and the effects of only the parallax seen. The solid (dashed) line shows the combined fitted eastward (northward) parallax curve. -- 14 -- Table 3: G35.20−1.74 Parallax & Proper Motion Fits Maser VLSR Background Parallax µx µy (km s−1) 41.9 ... 41.9 ... 41.9 ... 41.9 ... 41.5 ... 41.5 ... 41.5 ... 41.5 ... 41.9 ... 41.5 ... Note. -- see table 2 note. Source J1855+0251 J1903+0145 J1904+0110 J1907+0127 J1855+0251 J1903+0145 J1904+0110 J1907+0127 (mas) (mas y−1) (mas y−1) 0.272 ± 0.048 −0.76 ± 0.08 −3.83 ± 0.66 0.220 ± 0.021 −0.67 ± 0.04 −3.71 ± 0.44 0.287 ± 0.042 −0.76 ± 0.07 −3.66 ± 0.36 0.274 ± 0.067 −0.75 ± 0.12 −3.85 ± 0.58 0.368 ± 0.047 −0.78 ± 0.08 −3.62 ± 0.08 0.319 ± 0.021 −0.70 ± 0.03 −3.50 ± 0.21 0.385 ± 0.043 −0.78 ± 0.07 −3.44 ± 0.31 0.363 ± 0.066 −0.76 ± 0.12 −3.63 ± 0.11 Combined 0.306 ± 0.045 −0.74 ± 0.07 −3.73 ± 0.24 −0.69 ± 0.07 −3.50 ± 0.24 4. Galactic Locations & 3-dimensional Motions In order to study the 3-dimensional motion of the maser sources in the Galaxy, we convert their radial and proper motions from the equatorial heliocentric reference frame in which they are measured into a Galactic reference frame. A convenient frame is one rotating with a constant speed at the position of the maser source: ie, a "local standard of rest" for the location of maser. The methods used to convert to this frame will be documented in Reid et al. (in preparation, Paper VI). We use the IAU recommended values of R0 = 8.5 kpc and Θ0 = 220 km s−1, and the Hipparcos solar motion values U = 10.0 ± 0.40, V = 5.2 ± 0.60, and W = 7.2 ± 0.40 km s−1(Dehnen & Binney 1998). For this Galactic model, G35.20−0.74 has a peculiar motion of −13 km s−1 in the direction of Galactic rotation, 0 km s−1 toward the Galactic Center and −8 km s−1 toward the North Galactic Pole. For G35.20−1.74, we find peculiar motion component of −16 km s−1 in the direction of Galactic rotation, 1 km s−1 toward the Galactic Center and −9 km s−1 toward the North Galactic Pole. Thus, both sources are rotating slower than the Galaxy spins, that is, slower than for a circular orbit for a flat rotation curve for the Galaxy. Neither source has a significant peculiar velocity component toward the Galactic center and both are moving toward the NGP at about −8 km s−1. Research on the structure of the galaxy in Nanjing University is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grants 1062130, 10673024, 10703010 and 10733030, and NBRPC (973 Program) under grant 2007CB815403. Andreas Brunthaler was supported by the DFG Priority Programme 1177. -- 15 -- REFERENCES Braz, M.A., Epchtein, N., 1983, A&AS, 54, 167 Brunthaler, A. et al. (2009), this volume, (Paper V) Caswell, J.L., Haynes, R.F. 1983, Aust. J. Phys., 36, 417 Caswell, J. L., Vaile, R. A., Ellingsen, S. P., Whiteoak, J. B. & Norris, R. P., 1995, MNRAS, 272, 96 Churchwell, E., Walmsley, C.M., Cesaroni, R., 1990, 159, A&AS, 83, 119 De Buizer, J. M., Radomski, J. T., Telesco, C. M. & Pinal, R. K., 2004, A&AS, Vol. 36, 1619 De Buizer, J. M, James M. , 2006 ApJ, 642L, 57 Dehnen, W., & Binney, J. J., 1998, MNRAS, 298, 387 Fomalont, E., Petrov, L., McMillan, D. S., Gordon, D., & Ma. C., 2003, AJ, 126, 2562 Forster, J. R., Caswell, J. L., 1989, A&A, 213, 339 Genzel, R., Downes, D., 1977, A&AS, 30, 145 Gibb, A. G., Hoare, M. G., Little, L. T., Wright, M. C. H., 2003 MNRAS, 339, 1011 Hachisuka, K. et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 337 Kalenskii, S. V., Promislov, V. G., Alakoz, A., Winnberg, A. V. & Johansson, L. E. B., 2000 A&A, 354, 1036 Palagi, F., Cesaroni, R., Comoretto, G., Felli, M., Natale, V., 1993, A&AS, 101, 153 Petrov, L., Kovalev, Yu. Y., Fomalont, E., & Gordon, D., 2005, AJ, 129, 1163 Ma C., Arias E. F., Eubanks T. M., et al., 1998, AJ, 116, 516 Moscadelli, L. et al. 2008, this volume, (Paper II) Reid, M. J. et al. (2009) this volume, (Paper I) Reid, M. J. (in preparation), Paper VI Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J., Yahil, A., 1987 ApJ, 319, 730 Vallee, J.P., MacLeod, J.M., 1990, ApJ, 358, 183 Xu Y., Reid M. J., Zheng X. W. & Menten, K. M. 2006a, Science, 311, 54 -- 16 -- Xu Y., Reid M. J., Menten K. M., Zheng X. W., 2006, ApJS, 166, 526 Xu, Y. et al. (2009), this volume, (Paper III) Zhang, B. et al. (2009), this volume, (Paper IV, this paper) This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
astro-ph/0701829	1	0701	2007-01-29T16:08:30	A large CO and HCN line survey of Luminous Infrared Galaxies	[ "astro-ph" ]	A large CO, HCN multi-transition survey of 30 Luminous Infrared Galaxies ($\rm L_{IR}>10^{11} L_{\odot}$) is nearing completion with the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) on Mauna Kea (Hawaii), and the IRAM 30-meter telescope at Pico Veleta (Spain). The CO J=1--0, 2--1, 3--2, 4--3,6--5, $ ^{13}$CO J=2--1, HCN J=1--0, 3--2, 4--3 observations, resulting from $\sim 250$ hours of JCMT, $\sim 100$ hours of 30-m observing time and data from the literature constitute {\it the largest extragalactic molecular line survey to date}, and can be used to address a wide range of issues and eventually allow the construction of reliable Spectral Line Energy Distributions (SLEDs) for the molecular gas in local starbursts. First results suggest that: a) HCN and HCO$^+$ J=1--0 line luminosities can be poor mass estimators of dense molecular gas ($\rm n\geq 10^4 cm^{-3}$) unless their excitation is accounted for, b) CO cooling of such gas in ULIRGs may be comparable to that of the CII line at $\rm 158 \mu m$, and c) low excitation of the {\it global} molecular gas reservoir remains possible in such systems. In such cases the expected low CO $\rm J+1\to J$ line luminosities for $\rm J+1\geq 4$ can lead to a strong bias against their detection from ULIRGs at high redshifts.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astrophysics and Space Science manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) A large CO and HCN line survey of Luminous Infrared Galaxies Padelis P. Papadopoulos · Thomas R. Greve · Paul van der Werf · Stefanie Muehle · Kate Isaak · Yu Gao 7 0 0 2 n a J 9 2 1 v 9 2 8 1 0 7 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract A large CO, HCN multi-transition survey of 30 Luminous Infrared Galaxies (LIR > 1011 L⊙) is nearing com- pletion with the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) on Mauna Kea (Hawaii), and the IRAM 30-meter telescope at Pico Veleta (Spain). The CO J=1 -- 0, 2 -- 1, 3 -- 2, 4 -- 3,6 -- 5, 13CO J=2 -- 1, HCN J=1 -- 0, 3 -- 2, 4 -- 3 observations, resulting from ∼ 250 hours of JCMT, ∼ 100 hours of 30-m observ- ing time and data from the literature constitute the largest extragalactic molecular line survey to date, and can be used to address a wide range of issues and eventually allow the construction of reliable Spectral Line Energy Distributions (SLEDs) for the molecular gas in local starbursts. First re- sults suggest that: a) HCN and HCO+ J=1 -- 0 line luminosi- ties can be poor mass estimators of dense molecular gas (n ≥ 104 cm−3) unless their excitation is accounted for, b) CO cooling of such gas in ULIRGs may be comparable to that of the CII line at 158 m m, and c) low excitation of the global molecular gas reservoir remains possible in such sys- tems. In such cases the expected low CO J+1 → J line lumi- nosities for J + 1 ≥ 4 can lead to a strong bias against their detection from ULIRGs at high redshifts. Padelis P. Papadopoulos Institut fur Astronomie, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0)44 633 3826 Fax: +41 (0)44 633 1238 E-mail: [email protected] Thomas R. Greve California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Paul van der Werf Sterrewacht Leiden, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Stefanie Muehle Department of Astronomy, Univ. of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada Kate Isaak Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Wales, Cardiff CF24 3YB, UK Yu Gao Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China Keywords Galaxies: starbursts · Galaxies: ISM · Galaxies: active · ISM: molecules 1 Introduction The importance of Luminous Infrared Galaxies (hereafter LIRGs) as the sites of the most extreme local star forma- tion events ([9]) makes them the best available templates for similar events in the distant Universe. Moreover their com- pact CO-emitting regions ([1]) makes them ideal for multi- line studies of their global molecular gas reservoir up to very high frequencies (where the high-excitation molecular lines lie) since the resulting narrow beams of today's sin- gle dish radio telescopes can still measure their total line fluxes with single pointings. Our sensitive CO J=2 -- 1, 3 -- 2, 4 -- 3, 6 -- 5, 13CO J=2 -- 1 and HCN J=3 -- 2 and 4 -- 3 line ob- servations with the JCMT and the IRAM 30-m telescope for ∼ 30 LIRGs, combined with available CO and HCN J=1 -- 0 data from the literature, will allow for excellent new constraints on the state of their global molecular gas reser- voirs. More specifically the high-J CO and the three HCN transitions can probe the excitation and mass of the dense (n ≥ 104 cm−3) gas, considered as the immediate fuel of their prodigious star formation ([10], [3]). The completion of our CO J=4 -- 3 and J=6 -- 5 observations and follow-up ob- servations of still higher rotational CO, 13CO and HCN tran- sitions with Herschel will ultimately allow the deduction of robust SLEDs for the star-forming molecular gas of LIRGs in the local Universe. These can then be used to uncover any universal aspects of the star-formation/molecular gas inter- play in galaxies and find the best rest-frame mm/sub-mm lines for detecting and imaging the numerous LIRGs that will be found at high redshifts in future deep mm/sub-mm continuum surveys ([5]). 2 Arp 220 CO J=3−2 5x(HCN J=4−3) Arp 193 CO J=3−2 100x(HCN J=4−3) Fig. 1 HCN J=4 -- 3 (scaled by the numbers in the upper right of each panel) and CO J=3 -- 2 spectra of four LIRGs. The HCN (4 -- 3)/(1 -- 0) brightness temperature ratio r43(HCN) is found to vary from r43(HCN) ≤ 0.1 (Arp 193) to r43(HCN) ∼ 0.8 (Arp 220). Table 1 HCN vs HCO+ line ratios in Arp 220 and NGC 6240 Galaxy HCN (4−3) (1−0) HCN (3−2) (1−0) HCO+ (4−3) (1−0) HCO+ (3−2) (1−0) Arp 220 NGC 6240 0.8 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.3 0.33 ± 0.10 0.21 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.10 0.24 ± 0.08 2 HCN versus HCO+ lines as dense gas mass tracers The rotational transitions of the HCN and HCO+ molecules with their high dipole moments are currently the best (i.e. most luminous) dense gas tracers in LIRGs. An HCN J=1 -- 0 line survey of such galaxies ([3]) has even revealed a poten- tially constant star formation efficiency ((cid:181) LIR/Mdense(H2)) for molecular gas at densities n ≥ 104 cm−3, attributed to such a gas phase being the direct fuel of star formation in molecular clouds ([13]). Recent studies have inserted some doubt as to whether HCN lines are good tracers of such a gas phase and suggested those of HCO+ instead ([2]). Our sur- vey reveals a large range of HCN line excitation in LIRGs with otherwise similar IR, CO and HCN J=1 -- 0 luminosi- ties (Figure 1). In the case of Arp 193 the observed very low HCN (4 -- 3)/(1 -- 0) line ratio (its HCN 4 -- 3 is >100 times weaker than its CO J=3 -- 2 line!) is compatible with the com- plete absence of a massive and dense molecular gas phase. On the other hand for the two archetypal ULIRGs Arp 220 and NGC 6240 the HCN ratios are significantly larger than the corresponding ones (in rotational level) of HCO+ (Table 1). This, along with the fact that HCO+ rotational transi- tions also have ∼ 5 − 7 times lower critical densities than those of HCN, signifies that the latter is tracing a denser gas phase and may thus may remain as the most suitable gas mass tracer in galaxies once the excitation of its rotational lines is properly accounted for. 3 The dense molecular gas in Mrk 231 The prototypical ULIRG/QSO Mrk 231 is the first object in our sample for which the full set of line observations Fig. 2 CO, CI, CII cooling contributions in the ULIRG/QSO Mrk 231 has been completed, allowing for a unique view into the global excitation conditions of its molecular gas. Analysis of the relative strengths of the CO J=1 -- 0, 2 -- 1, 3 -- 2, 4 -- 3, 6 -- 5 and HCN J=1 -- 0, 4 -- 3 lines (and 13CO J=2 -- 1 from the literature,[4]) finds the low-J CO lines dominated by dif- fuse (n ∼ few × 102 cm−3), and warm (Tk ∼ 90 − 100 K) gas, while the high-excitation CO J=6 -- 5, 4 -- 3 and the HCN transitions trace a denser (∼ (1 − 3) × 104 cm−3) phase with somewhat lower temperatures (Tk ∼ 50 − 70 K). The latter dominates the total molecular gas mass in Mrk 231, and its total CO line cooling is similar to that of the CII line at 158 m m (Figure 2). This suggests a different thermal balance to that of lower IR-luminosity galaxies, and may explain the relative weakness of the CII cooling line in such systems as a result of the dominance of dense Photon Dominated Re- gions (PDRs) for most of their molecular gas ([6]). 3 Table 2 CO line ratios of a "warm" and a "cold" ULIRG Galaxy CO (2−1) (1−0) CO (3−2) (1−0) CO (4−3) (1−0) 12CO 13CO 17208-0014 05189-2524 1.02 ± 0.22 0.32 ± 0.08 0.72 ± 0.17 0.24 ± 0.07 < 0.32 0.74 ± 0.23 ≥ 35 6 ± 2 4 A "cold" and a "warm" ULIRG Molecular gas excitation at levels far below those found in Mrk 231 or other such galaxies used as templates for high redshift starbursts (e.g. Arp 220), have been uncovered by our ongoing survey, further underlying the need for local CO SLEDs to be established for a large sample of local LIRGs. The two ULIRGs (LIR > 1012 L⊙) IRAS 17208-0014 and IRAS 05189-2524 have been found to have very different CO line excitation (Figure 4) despite similar IR continuum and CO J=1 -- 0 line luminosities and similar S60 m m/S100 m m ratios. For IRAS 17208-0014 the CO brightness temperature ratios measured are typical for the high-excitation star form- ing molecular gas found in many such galaxies, but those found for the "cold" IRAS 05189-2524 are surprisingly typ- ical of the quiescent molecular clouds found in the Milky Way disk (Table 2). One-phase radiative transfer models us- ing the Large Velocity Gradient (LVG) approximation and constrained by the line ratios of IRAS 17208-0014 are com- patible with densities of n ∼ 103 cm−3 and mostly warm Tk ∼ (70 − 100)K. The high 12CO/13CO J=2 -- 1 ratio mea- sured for this merger system (Table 2) is responsible for the low CO J=1 -- 0 optical depths (t 10 ≤ 0.5) of this gas phase, a result of its high temperatures and large average ve- locity gradients dV/dR ∼ 30 km s−1 pc−1 (for an abundance of [CO/H2] = 10−4). The latter corresponds to a parame- ter Kvir = (dV/dR)obs ∼ 30 − 50, typical of an unbound gas (dV/dR)virial phase ([7]). It is also worth noting that the high (4 -- 3)/(1 -- 0) CO ratio (comparable to that of CO(3 -- 2)/(1 -- 0)) cannot be accounted by a single gas phase model and probably signi- fies the emergence of a second warmer and denser phase. In several LIRGs (e.g. Mrk 231) such a phase has been found to dominate CO J + 1 → J, J + 1 ≥ 4 and HCN line emis- sion and containing most of their molecular gas mass, and is most likely the direct fuel of their prodigious star formation. The CO emission in IRAS 05189-2524 on the other hand is compatible with gas of n ∼ 100 cm−3, Tk ∼ 15 K, and Kvir ∼ 1, typical of the quiescent and mostly self-gravitating molecular clouds found in the Galactic disk immersed in a FUV radiation field of G◦ ∼ 1 (Habing units). In such con- ditions high-J CO lines are expected to be very faint with CO(J+1 −J)/(1 −0) ≤ 0.01 for J+1 ≥ 4 for the bulk of the molecular gas. This is much lower than that expected from CO SLEDs of other ULIRGs such as Mrk 231 or Arp 220 or indeed most high redshift objects ([8]), with only the ex- tremely red object HR 10 coming close (Figure 3). Fig. 3 CO line luminosities of various high-redshift objects compared to the Mrk 231 CO dense gas SLED template (bars). Luminosities are normalized to those of Mrk 231 at either CO J=3 -- 2 or J=2 -- 1. Line fluxes for the various objects are taken from the literature ([11], [8]). 3.1 A comparison with high-z starbursts The high-J CO and the HCN lines detected in Mrk 231 pro- vide good constraints on radiative transfer models which then allow a good CO SLED to be constructed. Its compari- son with objects at high redshifts shows that despite the high excitation of its dense molecular gas its CO SLED stands as rather average (Figure 3). However, strong lensing (af- fecting several objects in Figure 3) can selectively amplify the highly excited CO line emission of compact starburst re- gions at the expence of a much more extended low-excitation non-star forming molecular gas phase (e.g. [12]). Further- more, the high-J CO observations usually conducted after spectroscopic redshifts of high-z objects become available may select mostly from a subset of starbursts where the (star- forming)/(non star-forming) H2 gas mass ratio (expected to vary strongly in the several merger systems among LIRGs) is particularly large. The limited sensitivity of today's cm and mm/sub-mm single dish telescopes and interferometers will further accentuate the aforementioned biases, which may thus produce CO SLEDs at high redshifts which are biased towards the high excitation regime, and are thus unrepresen- tative of the full excitation range in star-forming galaxies. In that respect CO (and HCN) SLEDs of local ULIRGs, established from observationally well-sampled J-ladders of rotational transitions, are indispensible as benchmarks unaf- fected by the aforementioned biases. 4 Fig. 4 CO J=4 -- 3, 3 -- 2 and 2 -- 1 spectral lines (plotted with declining line thickness) for the "cold" IRAS 05189-2524 (left panel) and the "warm" IRAS 17208-0014 (right panel) galaxies. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the telescope operators and staff of the JCMT and IRAM 30-m telescope for their assistance during the extensive observations that made this project possible. Spe- cial thanks to Jim Hoge, Per Friberg and Iain Coulson at the JCMT for expert advice and assistance with the observations during many years. References 1. Downes D., & Solomon P. M. 1998, ApJ, 507, 615 2. Graci´a-Carpio J., Garci´a-Burillo S. & Colina L. 2006, ApJ, 640, L135 3. Gao Y., & Solomon P. M. 2004, ApJ, 606, 271 4. Glenn J., & Hunter T. R. 2001, ApJS, 135, 177 5. Hughes D. H. in The Neutral ISM in Starburst Galaxies, ASP Con- ference Series, Vol. 320, 2004, pg. 317 6. Kaufman M. J., Wolfire M. G., Hollenbach D. J., & Luhman M. J. 1999, ApJ, 527, 795 7. Papadopoulos P. P., & Seaquist E. R. 1999, ApJ, 516, 114 8. Riechers, D. A. et. al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 604 9. Sanders D. B., & Ishida C. M. 2004, in The Neutral ISM in Starburst Galaxies, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 320, 2004, pg. 230 10. Solomon P. M., Downes D., & Radford S. J. E. 1992, ApJ, 387, L55 11. Solomon P. M., & Vanden Bout P. A. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 677 12. Weiss, A., Walter, F., & Scoville, N. Z. 2004, in The Neutral ISM in Starburst Galaxies ASP Conference Series Vol. 320, p. 142 13. Wu J., Evans II N. J., Gao Y., Solomon P. M., Shirley Y. L., & Vanden Bout P. A. 2005, ApJ, 635, L173 Thus starburst galaxies at high resdshifts with similar CO SLEDs to that of IRAS 05189-2524 would remain unde- tected by typical high-J CO observations with today's radio telescopes, even after scaling their CO line fluxes by their ∼ 10 times higher IR luminosities. One of the goals of the CO and HCN multi-transition survey of LIRGs is to find how often such low-excitation molecular SLEDs occur in starbursts, and seek out correlations with other galaxy char- acteristics (e.g. merger status, starburst age, dust tempera- tures). This may in turn shed some light into how otherwise vigorously star-forming galaxies can harbor large amounts of low-excitation molecular gas. 5 Conclusions We report preliminary results from our ongoing CO and HCN multi-transition of 30 local LIRGs, the largest such survey to date. These can be summarized as follows, -- A large range of HCN line excitation precludes the sim- ple use of the HCN or HCO+ J=1 -- 0 line luminosity as a dense gas mass tracer. -- In the two cases of Arp 220 and NGC 6240, the HCN versus the HCO+ line excitation suggests the former trac- ing the densest gas phase. -- In the ULIRG/QSO Mrk 231 the luminous CO J=4 -- 3 and J=6 -- 5 line emission emanates from a different gas phase than the one dominating the low-J CO transitions. In that phase total CO line cooling is comparable to that of the CII line at 158 m m. If confirmed for more such galaxies this raises the possibility of a very different ther- mal balance than that seen in lower IR-luminosity sys- tems where the CII line is the dominant coolant. -- The discovery of very low CO excitation in the ULIRG IRAS 05189-2524 raises the possibility of a large exci- tation bias against detecting similar objects at high red- shifts via their high-J CO line emission.
0809.4012	1	0809	2008-09-24T16:30:05	Properties of the Youngest Protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present an unbiased census of deeply embedded protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus, assembled by combining large-scale 1.1 mm Bolocam continuum and Spitzer Legacy surveys. We identify protostellar candidates based on their mid-infrared properties, correlate their positions with 1.1 mm core positions, and construct well-sampled SEDs using our extensive wavelength coverage (lam=1.25-1100 micron). Source classification based on the bolometric temperature yields a total of 39 Class 0 and 89 Class I sources in the three cloud sample. We compare to protostellar evolutionary models using the bolometric temperature-luminosity diagram, finding a population of low luminosity Class I sources that are inconsistent with constant or monotonically decreasing mass accretion rates. This result argues strongly for episodic accretion during the Class I phase, with more than 50% of sources in a ``sub-Shu'' (dM/dt < 1e-6 Msun/yr) accretion state. Average spectra are compared to protostellar radiative transfer models, which match the observed spectra fairly well in Stage 0, but predict too much near-IR and too little mid-IR flux in Stage I. Finally, the relative number of Class 0 and Class I sources are used to estimate the lifetime of the Class 0 phase; the three cloud average yields a Class 0 lifetime of 1.7e5 yr, ruling out an extremely rapid early accretion phase. Correcting photometry for extinction results in a somewhat shorter lifetime (1.1e5 yr). In Ophiuchus, however, we find very few Class 0 sources (N(Class0)/N(ClassI)=0.1-0.2), similar to previous studies of that cloud. The observations suggest a consistent picture of nearly constant average accretion rate through the entire embedded phase, with accretion becoming episodic by at least the Class I stage, and possibly earlier.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version June 12, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 8 0 0 2 p e S 4 2 ] h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 2 1 0 4 . 9 0 8 0 : v i X r a PROPERTIES OF THE YOUNGEST PROTOSTARS IN PERSEUS, SERPENS, AND OPHIUCHUS Melissa L. Enoch1, Neal J. Evans II2, Anneila I. Sargent3, and Jason Glenn4 Draft version June 12, 2018 ABSTRACT We present an unbiased census of deeply embedded protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophi- uchus, assembled by combining large-scale 1.1 mm Bolocam continuum and Spitzer Legacy surveys. We identify protostellar candidates based on their mid-infrared properties, correlate their positions with 1.1 mm core positions from Enoch et al. (2006), Young et al. (2006), and Enoch et al. (2007), and construct well-sampled SEDs using our extensive wavelength coverage (λ = 1.25 − 1100 µm). Source classification based on the bolometric temperature yields a total of 39 Class 0 and 89 Class I sources in the three cloud sample. We compare to protostellar evolutionary models using the bolo- metric temperature-luminosity diagram, finding a population of low luminosity Class I sources that are inconsistent with constant or monotonically decreasing mass accretion rates. This result argues strongly for episodic accretion during the Class I phase, with more than 50% of sources in a "sub-Shu" (dM/dt < 10−6 M⊙ yr−1) accretion state. Average spectra are compared to protostellar radiative transfer models, which match the observed spectra fairly well in Stage 0, but predict too much near-IR and too little mid-IR flux in Stage I. Finally, the relative number of Class 0 and Class I sources are used to estimate the lifetime of the Class 0 phase; the three cloud average yields a Class 0 lifetime of 1.7 ± 0.3 × 105 yr, ruling out an extremely rapid early accretion phase. Correcting photometry for extinction results in a somewhat shorter lifetime (1.1 × 105 yr). In Ophiuchus, however, we find very few Class 0 sources (NClass 0/NClass I ∼ 0.1 − 0.2), similar to previous studies of that cloud. The observations suggest a consistent picture of nearly constant average accretion rate through the entire embedded phase, with accretion becoming episodic by at least the Class I stage, and possibly earlier. Subject headings: stars: formation - ISM: clouds - ISM: individual (Perseus, Serpens, Ophiuchus) – submillimeter – infrared: ISM 1. INTRODUCTION The problem of how low mass stars like the sun form has been studied extensively over the last few decades. Compared to more evolved protostars and pre-main se- quence objects, however, the earliest stages of the star formation process, from the formation of dense cores through the main mass accretion phase, are relatively poorly understood. This lack of information is due in large part to the difficulty of observing young, deeply embedded sources, which are shrouded within dense pro- tostellar envelopes and only observable via reprocessed emission at mid-infrared to millimeter wavelengths. Fur- thermore, most previous observations of deeply embed- ded objects have naturally focused on a small number of very bright or well known sources, due to the sensi- tivity and resolution limitations of long-wavelength sur- veys. Understanding the formation of typical stars re- quires complete samples of young objects, over molecular cloud scales. Currently, the details of the early evolution of proto- stellar sources are extremely uncertain, including mass accretion rates during the Class 0 and Class I phases. In addition, measurements of the timescales associated Electronic address: MLE: [email protected] 1 Department of Astronomy, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720 2 The University of Texas at Austin, Astronomy Department, 1 University Station C1400, Austin, TX, 78712-0259 3 Division of Physics, Mathematics & Astronomy, California In- stitute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 4 Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, 389-UCB, Uni- versity of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 with the earliest stages vary considerably, ranging from 105 to 107 yr for prestellar cores (Ward-Thompson et al. 2007) and from 104 to a few ×105 yr for Class 0 (Andr´e & Montmerle 1994; Visser et al. 2002). In fact, the association of Class 0 and Class I with distinct evolutionary stages is still a matter of debate (e.g., Jayawardhana et al. 2001). Large surveys at mid- infrared to millimeter wavelengths, where the SEDs of embedded sources peak, are essential for understanding how protostars evolve through their earliest stages. In addition to providing complete samples of young sources, large surveys are also important for characterizing vari- ations in the star formation process with environment. With a few notable recent exceptions (Jørgensen et al. 2007; Hatchell et al. 2007a), previous samples of very young protostars have typically been compiled from many different surveys, and suffered from systematics, unquantified environmental effects, and small number statistics. We recently completed large-scale 1.1 mm continuum surveys of Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus with Bolocam at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO). Maps have a resolution of 31′′ and cover 7.5 deg2 in Perseus (140 pc2 at our adopted cloud distance of d = 250 pc), 10.8 deg2 in Ophiuchus (50 pc2 at d = 125 pc), and 1.5 deg2 in Serpens (30 pc2 at d = 260 pc) (Enoch et al. 2006; Young et al. 2006; Enoch et al. 2007, hereafter Papers I, II, and III, respectively). These Bolo- cam surveys complement large Spitzer Space Telescope IRAC and MIPS maps of the same clouds from the "From Molecular Cores to Planet-forming Disks" Spitzer Legacy program ("Cores to Disks" or c2d; Evans et al. 2 2003). Millimeter emission traces the dust in dense starless cores and protostellar envelopes, and provides a measure of core and envelope properties, including sizes, masses, and spatial distribution. Spitzer IRAC and MIPS ob- servations are complementary in that they provide in- formation about the properties of any young protostars embedded within dense cores. Combining these data en- ables us to assemble a mass limited, unbiased census of the youngest star-forming objects in three different envi- ronments, including prestellar cores, Class 0, and Class I protostars. In Paper III we looked at how the global cloud envi- ronment influences the properties of star-forming cores (Enoch et al. 2007). In a companion paper to this work (Enoch et al. 2008), we examine the properties of prestel- lar and protostellar cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophi- uchus, focusing on the prestellar core mass distribution and the lifetime of prestellar cores. A similar analysis comparing the c2d Spitzer data to large SCUBA maps of Perseus and Ophiuchus has recently been carried out by Jørgensen et al. (2007, 2008), focusing on the differ- ence between starless and protostellar cores, as well as cloud properties such as the star formation efficiency and how it varies with spatial clustering. We follow Di Francesco et al. (2007) in defining millimeter cores containing a compact luminous internal source (i.e., an embedded protostar) as "protostellar cores", regardless of whether the final object will be stellar or sub-stellar in nature. We use "starless cores" to refer to dense cores without an internal luminosity source, and "prestellar cores" as starless cores that are likely to be gravitation- ally bound (see Enoch et al. 2008). In this work we exploit the combined power of millime- ter and mid- to far-infrared observations to study the evolution of young protostars embedded within the pro- tostellar cores. Extensive wavelength coverage from λ = 1.25− 1100 µm allows us to trace the evolution of proto- stellar sources in their main mass accretion phase, from formation through the end of the embedded phase. We follow Robitaille et al. (2006) and Crapsi et al. (2008) in using "Stage" (e.g., Stage 0, I, II, III) to refer to a source's true physical nature, regardless of its ob- served properties, while the corresponding "Class" refers to the observational classification, typically based on the near- to mid-infrared slope αIR (Adams et al. 1987; Greene et al. 1994) or on the bolometric temperature (Myers & Ladd 1993). We assume that Stage 0 and Stage I refer to an evo- lutionary sequence of embedded protostars with M∗ < Menv and M∗ > Menv, respectively (e.g. Andr´e 1994), where M∗ is the protostar mass and Menv the enve- lope mass. Similarly, we assume Stage II refers to pre- main sequence stars with very little remaining envelope (Menv < 0.1M⊙; Crapsi et al. 2008). Our adopted def- initions of various Classes and Stages are summarized in Table 1. Ideally, Class I would directly correspond to Stage I, etc., but as shown by Robitaille et al. (2006) and Crapsi et al. (2008), geometric effects can cause, for example, Stage II sources to be classified as Class I. In §2 we describe the 1.1 mm and Spitzer infrared (IR) data, including how protostellar candidates are identi- fied and their association with 1.1 mm cores. We cal- culate bolometric luminosities and temperatures, enve- Enoch et al. lope masses, and discuss completeness (§3). Protostel- lar classification methods are compared in §4. Spectral characteristics of Class 0, I and II sources detected at 1.1 mm are discussed in §5, including selected individual sources (§5.2). In §6 we explore alternative classification schemes made possible by our large sample, and com- pare the average observed spectra to protostellar models in §7. Sources are placed on a bolometric temperature- luminosity diagram for comparison to protostellar evolu- tionary models and to study their luminosity evolution, mass accretion rates, and envelope evolution (§8). Fi- nally, in §9 we calculate lifetimes for the Class 0 phase. 2. COMBINING BOLOCAM AND SPITZER C2D DATA Both Bolocam 1.1 mm and Spitzer maps were designed to cover down to a visual extinction of AV & 2 mag in Perseus, AV & 3 mag in Ophiuchus, and AV & 6 mag in Serpens (Evans et al. 2003). The actual overlap in area between Bolocam and IRAC maps is shown in Figure 1 of Papers I, II, and III for Perseus, Ophiuchus, and Ser- pens, respectively. Catalogs listing c2d measured Spitzer fluxes of all sources in each of the three clouds, as well as near-infrared fluxes for sources in the 2MASS catalogs, are available through the Spitzer database (Evans et al. 2007). We utilize wavelength coverage from λ = 1.25 to 1100 µm, using 2MASS (1.25, 1.65, 2.17 µm), IRAC (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0 µm), MIPS (24, 70, 160 µm), and Bolocam (1.1 mm) data. Note that 160 µm flux measurements are not included in the c2d delivery catalogs due to substan- tial uncertainties and incompleteness, but are included here when possible. Photometry at 160µm is discussed in Rebull et al. (2007) and Harvey et al. (2007b), where 160µm fluxes for point sources in Perseus and Serpens are also given. Basic data papers describe the processing and analysis of the Spitzer IRAC and MIPS maps of Perseus, Ser- pens, and Ophiuchus, as well as presenting general prop- erties of the sources in each cloud, such as color-color and color-magnitude diagrams (Jørgensen et al. 2006; Harvey et al. 2006; Rebull et al. 2007; Harvey et al. 2007b). The young stellar object (YSO) population in Serpens is discussed in detail by Harvey et al. (2007a). Here we are most interested in the young protostellar sources that are most likely to be embedded in the mil- limeter cores detected with Bolocam. For the following we will use the term "embedded protostar candidate" in general to encompass candidate Stage I and younger ob- jects. Although it will become apparent in §2.1 that our criteria also pick up a number of Stage II sources, in gen- eral we focus on sources with evidence for a protostellar envelope (Stage 0 and I). Figure 1 shows the result of combining Spitzer and Bolocam data, for a few examples of embedded protostel- lar sources in each cloud. Images are three-color Spitzer maps (8.0, 24, 70 µm), with 1.1 mm contours overlaid. The Bolocam ID of the associated 1.1 mm core is given in each panel, as well as the embedded source IDs from Tables 2–4. We use the 2MASS, IRAC, MIPS, and Bolo- cam data to construct complete SEDs from 2 to 1100 µm for each candidate protostellar source, shown in the lower panels (see also §3). Additional SHARC II 350 µm fluxes (Wu et al. 2007) and SCUBA 850 µm fluxes (Kirk et al. 2006, open circles) are included when available. Modified black-body (Sν ∝ νβBν (T )) curves for a temperature of Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 3 Fig. 1.- Three-color Spitzer images 8 µm (blue), 24 µm (green), and 70 µm (red) of selected embedded protostar candidates in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus, with Bolocam 1.1 mm contours. The Bolocam ID of the centered core and embedded protostar IDs from Tables 2–4 given, and contour intervals for the 1.1 mm emission are 3, 6...15, 20, 25, ...σ. Spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the candidates are plotted in the lower panels. SEDs include 2MASS, IRAC, and MIPS photometry from the c2d database and 1.1 mm fluxes (asterisks). Published 350 µm and 850 µm points (open circles) are also shown when available. A modified blackbody spectrum (T = 15 K, β = 1) is overlaid for reference. 4 Enoch et al. 15 K and β = 1 are shown for reference in Figure 1 (dot- ted lines). Protostellar sources in our sample may be isolated (e.g., Per-Bolo 57) or lie in crowded regions (e.g., Per- Bolo 49). Approximately 20%–50% of the time, more than one protostellar source lies within a single 1.1 mm core (20% of the embedded protostar sample in Ophi- uchus, 40% in Perseus, and 55% in Serpens). Much of this difference is certainly due to the lower resolution of Bolocam (31′′) compared to Spitzer (7′′at 24 µm), caus- ing nearby Spitzer sources to be blended in the 1.1 mm map, although the envelopes detected at 1.1 mm are also physically more extended than the region emitting at Spitzer wavelengths. Sometimes the SEDs of such mul- tiple sources look similar to each other (Per-emb 18 and 22 in the lower-left panel of Figure 1), and sometimes quite different (Per-emb 49 of the same panel). Although the coverage of the IRAC, MIPS and Bolo- cam maps overlaps nearly perfectly for our purposes, there are a few cases in which embedded protostar candi- dates are outside the boundaries of the MIPS 70 µm map (three sources in Serpens) or 1.1 mm map (one source in Perseus). In addition, a number of bright sources in each cloud are saturated in the 24µm or 70µm c2d maps. In these cases we substitute IRAS 25µm or 60µm fluxes is the source does not appear to be blended in a visual in- spection of the the IRAS maps. The 160 µm maps are often saturated near bright sources and in regions of bright extended emission, such as near bright clusters of sources. Reliable 160 µm fluxes are especially difficult to determine in crowded regions, due both to the large beam size (40′′) and to saturation issues. The lack of 160 µm data is most problematic in Ophiuchus, where the 160 µm maps are saturated in all of the dense source regions. Even for isolated sources, the measured 160 µm flux density, determined from a point spread function (PSF) fit, may be underestimated if the source is extended. The effects of these issues on our analysis are discussed in more detail in the appendix (§ A). 2.1. Identifying Embedded Protostar Candidates We form a sample of candidate embedded protostars from the c2d catalogs; the first cut is based on the source "class." All sources in the c2d catalogs are assigned a class parameter based on colors, magnitudes, and stellar SED fits (see the c2d Delivery Document (Evans et al. 2007) and Harvey et al. (2007a)). Class parameters in- clude "star", "star+disk", "YSOc" (young stellar object candidate), "red", "rising", "Galc" (galaxy candidate), etc. Embedded protostars will generally be a subset of YSOc sources, but some of the most embedded may also be assigned to the "red" class if they are not detected in all IRAC bands. Thus, we begin by selecting all sources from the c2d database that are classified as "YSOc" or "red." From this list, we keep sources that meet all of the following criteria: (a) flux density at 24 µm (S24µm) ≥ 3 mJy (b) S24µm ≥ 5αIR + 8 mJy, where αIR is the near- to mid-infrared spectral index, determined by a least- squares fit to photometry between 2 and 24 µm. This criteria is motivated by a comparison to the carefully vetted Serpens YSO sample of Harvey et al. (2007a). (c) νS24µm > νS8µm, i.e., the SED is rising from 8 to 24 µm in νSν space. (d) S24µm must be of high quality, i.e., signal to noise (S/N) greater than 7. (e) S24µm is not a "band-filled" flux. For sources not originally detected in all Spitzer bands, a flux or up- per limit is measured at the source position (band-filling, Harvey et al. 2007a). Because the resolution is lower at 24 µm than at the shorter wavelengths, some IRAC-only sources have unreliable band-filled fluxes at 24 µm (e.g., sources are confused with the PSF wings of a nearby source). In addition to sources that meet the above criteria, we include any 70 µm point sources not classified as galaxy candidates ("Galc"). Note that these 70µm sources need not be classified as "red" or "YSOc". In each cloud, a number of deeply embedded sources that are bright at 70 µm but very weak at 24 µm (e.g., HH211 in Perseus) are recovered by this last criteria (5 in Perseus, 4 in Serpens, and 3 in Ophiuchus), as are a few very bright sources that are saturated at 24 µm (6 in Perseus, 2 in Serpens, and 6 in Ophiuchus; these are often classified as "rising"). Figure 2 plots S24µm versus αIR for embedded candi- dates in Serpens, where "+" symbols indicate the orig- inal ("YSOc"+"red"+ 70µm sources) sample for Ser- pens, and boxes indicate our embedded protostar can- didates after applying criteria (a)–(e). For compar- ison, diamonds indicate the carefully vetted Serpens YSO list from Harvey et al. (2007a). The majority of "+"-only points, which were rejected as true YSOs by Harvey et al. (2007a), are removed by criteria (a) and (b) (shown as solid lines). More than half of the vetted YSOs do not appear in the candidate embedded proto- star sample (diamond, no box); the majority of these are rejected by the rising SED criteria (c) and as they are primarily classified as "star+disk" we do not expected them to be embedded. There are a few sources in our sample that are not in the vetted YSO sample (box, no diamond). A few of these were easily identified as non- protostellar, and rejected, when examining by eye. We do identify three embedded protostar candidates in Ser- pens that are not in the vetted YSO list but seem to be associated with 1.1 mm emission (see §2.2): one "red", and two "rising". We include red sources to ensure that we identify the most embedded protostars, but we need to reject the large percentage of these sources that are likely to be galaxies. As shown in Figure 3, criteria (a) and (b) are ef- ficient at eliminating extragalactic sources. Here S24µm is plotted versus αIR for all "Galc" galaxy candidates in Serpens. As in Figure 2, lines show criteria (a) and (b) After forming our embedded candidate samples based on the above criteria, the images and SEDs of each source are examined by eye to remove any galaxies that are extended in the near-infrared, and other obviously non- embedded sources. SEDs include 2MASS, IRAC, MIPS and 1.1 mm fluxes. In some cases, there is no available point-source flux at 70 or 160 µm even if there is emis- sion at the position of the source, generally because the source is extended at these wavelengths. In these cases a flux density is measured by hand, if possible, using aper- ture photometry. Large uncertainties (50% or more) are Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 5 Fig. 2.- Plot of S24µm versus spectral index αIR for sources in Serpens, to demonstrate selection criteria for the embedded pro- tostar candidate samples. Plus symbols ("+") indicate the sam- ple from which the candidate embedded protostars is drawn, in- cluding all catalog sources labeled as "YSOc" or "red" as well as non-"Galc" 70µm sources. Lines show 24 µm flux cuts imposed by criteria (a) and (b), which remove the majority of spurious or background sources. Boxes indicate the final embedded protostar sample, after applying criteria (a)-(d). Smaller blue diamonds show the carefully vetted YSO sample from Harvey et al. (2006). The two samples agree fairly well, but because we select for embed- ded sources we miss many of the more evolved YSOs in the vetted YSO list (Class II/III). There are a few sources in the embedded protostar sample not in the Harvey et al. (2006) list, two of which are likely to be real (see text), while the others are rejected when examined by eye. associated with these band-filled flux measurements. 2.2. Association with a 1.1 mm Core The next step after assembling a sample of candidate embedded protostars is to determine which are associ- ated with 1.1 mm emission. The correlation between candidate protostar and 1.1 mm core positions was done in Enoch et al. (2008, see §2.3 and Figure 2), following a similar analysis by Jørgensen et al. (2007); we summa- rize the results here. We found that the coldest proto- stellar candidates (Tbol < 300 K, see §3.1) are primarily located within 1.0 × θ1mm of a millimeter core position, where θ1mm is the angular FWHM size of the 1.1 mm core, as expected if they are deeply embedded. Based on that analysis, a given embedded protostar candidate is assumed to be associated with a millimeter core if it is located within 1.0 × θ1mm of the 1.1 mm core centroid position. We also found in Enoch et al. (2008), based on anal- ysis of a spatially random distribution of sources, that we can expect approximately 5 false associations with 1.1 mm cores in each cloud. Using a more restrictive cri- teria (e.g., 0.5× θ1mm) would reduce the number of false Fig. 3.- Plot of S24µm versus spectral index αIR for galaxy candidates ("Galc") in Serpens. Selection criteria (a) and (b) are overlaid, as in Figure 2. These selection criteria eliminate most of the parameter space inhabited by extragalactic sources. associations, but would likely miss at least a few embed- ded protostars. For reference, adopting 0.5×θ1mm would result in 10 fewer embedded protostars in Perseus, 7 in Serpens, and 16 in Ophiuchus. If an embedded protostar candidate is found to be as- sociated with a millimeter core by the above criteria, the 1.1 mm flux is included in the protostellar SED, and is If a used to calculate an envelope mass (Menv, §3.2). candidate is not located within 1.0 × θ1mm of a millime- ter core position, we calculate a flux or upper limit from the original 1.1 mm map (although sources with upper limits at 1.1 mm are not included in the final lists of embedded protostars given in Tables 2–4). In a number of cases (10 in Perseus, 3 in Serpens, and 11 in Ophiuchus) there is clearly 1.1 mm flux at the pro- tostar position that was not identified as a core in the original 1.1 mm source extraction because it is below 5σ (where σ is the local rms noise, see Paper I) or is in a con- fused region of the map. If this emission exceeds 3σ, we measure a "band-filled" 1.1 mm flux using a small aper- ture (30′′–40′′). We also re-compute the 1.1 mm flux density in small apertures for all sources in regions of blended 1.1 mm emission. When more than one proto- star candidate is associated with a single compact mil- limeter core, we divide the total 1.1 mm flux of the core equally between the protostellar sources. The approach described above means that the 1.1 mm flux is not measured in a fixed aperture for every source. In crowded regions or for sources with close neighbors, the 1.1 mm flux is measured in a 30′′–40′′diameter aper- ture centered on the Spitzer source position. These sources are indicated by a footnote in Tables 2–4. For other sources, the Bolocam 1.1 mm core flux from Papers I–III is used. Typically, but not always, the total core flux is used here (integrated in the largest aperture, from 30′′− 120′′ diameters in steps of 10′′, that is smaller than the distance to the nearest neighboring source); fluxes 6 Enoch et al. in 30, 40, 80, and 120′′ apertures can also be found in Papers I–III. Approximately 50% of the embedded protostar candi- dates in each cloud are lacking 1.1 mm emission, even after re-examining the 1.1 mm maps at each source po- sition. Most of these sources appear to be Class II ob- jects, with little or no remaining envelope. Any 1.1 mm emission from these objects, therefore, is likely below our detection limit of ∼ 0.1M⊙ (§ 3.3). A few of these may actually be low luminosity sources that are truly embed- ded, with low mass envelopes below our detection limit. For this reason, we only claim completeness to embed- ded protostars with Menv > 0.1 M⊙. Note that this corresponds well to the Crapsi et al. (2008) definition of Stage I. 3. PROPERTIES OF EMBEDDED PROTOSTARS 3.1. Bolometric Luminosity and Temperature Our extensive wavelength coverage allows us to con- struct well-sampled SEDs for the embedded protostar candidates in all three clouds, from which we calculate a bolometric luminosity (Lbol) and bolometric tempera- ture (Tbol) for each source. The bolometric luminosity is calculated by integrating the SED (Sν ) over frequency: Lbol = 4πd2Z Sνdν. (1) The bolometric temperature is defined as the tempera- ture of a blackbody with the same mean frequency as the source SED, and is given by Tbol = 1.25 × 10−11hνi K (Myers & Ladd 1993), where the mean frequency is (2) (3) hνi = R νSνdν R Sνdν . Two methods for approximating the integrations over frequency for finitely sampled SEDs (midpoint and pris- moidal) are discussed in the appendix (§A). Tables 2–4 list the bolometric temperatures and lu- minosities derived for all embedded protostars in each cloud. As we are primarily interested in young, em- bedded objects, only sources with detectable 1.1 mm emission, which likely have substantial envelopes, are included. Sources are listed by increasing Tbol, and identified as, e.g., "Per-emb#", as well as by their c2d name (SSTc2dJ...), which also gives the position. When sources are saturated at 24 or 70µm, the IRAS 25 or 60µm flux is utilized when not affected by blending. In these cases a note is made in Tables 2–4. The correction of saturated fluxes can increase the luminosity by more than a factor of two; for saturated sources with no reli- able IRAS flux (also noted in Tables 2–4), the luminosity will be an underestimate. All Tbol and Lbol values quoted use the midpoint in- tegration method. The difference between the values calculated by the midpoint and prismoidal integration methods (given in parentheses in Tables 2–4) gives a more realistic measure of the uncertainties in Tbol and Lbol than the formal fitting errors (which are typically 10%). Uncertainties can be larger than 50% depending on whether or not a 160 µm flux is available, and there is an additional systematic uncertainty of 15–25% from finite sampling errors (§A). Systematic errors introduced by missing 160 µm fluxes are investigated in §A. Without a 160 µm measurement, Tbol will almost certainly be an overestimate for very cold sources, which may bias our classification of protostellar candidates (§4). Ophiuchus will be most affected, as only four sources in that cloud have reliable 160 µm fluxes. 3.1.1. Correcting for Extinction One might argue that we should correct our photom- etry for extinction before calculating Lbol and Tbol. The effects of extinction are typically ignored for Class 0 and Class I sources, for which one might expect the fore- ground extinction to be negligible relative to the ef- fect of the envelope itself. While these observed val- ues are most easily compared to the majority of previ- ous work, Chen et al. (1995), who connected Tbol to the classes defined by α, did correct the observed flux den- sities for extinction before computing Tbol. Therefore, we compute extinction corrected values for comparison (see Evans et al. 2008 for a more complete discussion of the effects of dereddening). We use the mean extinction to all Class II sources in each cloud (AV = 5.92 mag in Perseus, 9.57 mag in Serpens, an 9.76 mag in Ophiuchus; Evans et al. 2008) to deredden the photometry of Class 0 and Class I sources. As dereddening has a greater effect on shorter wave- length photometry, correcting for extinction tends to in- crease both Tbol and Lbol. Throughout this paper we will primarily use observed values, and not extinction corrected values, but the effects on derived values such as the Class 0 lifetime (§ 9) will be noted. When used, the extinction corrected bolometric luminosity and tem- perature are indicated by T ′bol and L′bol, respectively. 3.2. Envelope Mass The envelope mass of candidate protostars, Menv, is calculated from the flux density at 1.1 mm, S1mm: M = d2S1mm B1mm(TD)κ1mm , (4) where d is the cloud distance, κ1mm = 0.0114 cm2 g−1 is the dust opacity per gram of gas at 1.1 mm, and B1mm is the Planck function at a dust temperature of TD. The opacity is interpolated from Table 1 column 5 of Ossenkopf & Henning (1994) for dust grains with thin ice mantles. We assume a dust temperature of TD = 15 K for proto- stellar envelopes, consistent with average isothermal dust temperatures found from radiative transfer models of a sample of Class 0 and Class I protostars (Shirley et al. 2002; Young et al. 2003). The isothermal dust tempera- ture is the temperature that, when used in an isothermal mass equation (e.g., Eq. (4), above) yields the same mass as does a detailed radiative transfer model that accounts for temperature gradients. Dust temperatures will be higher than 15 K close to the protostar, but the major- ity of the envelope mass is in the outer, cooler, regions of the envelope. A dust temperature of 10 K would result in an increase in masses by a factor of 1.9, while TD = 20 K would decrease masses by a factor of 1.5. Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 7 Fig. 4.- Near- to mid-IR spectral index (αIR) versus bolometric temperature (Tbol) for the candidate embedded protostar samples in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. Bold symbols indicate sources that are associated with 1.1 mm emission, and thin symbols denote those with upper limits at 1.1 mm. Standard class divisions for both Tbol and αIR are shown. The two methods agree fairly well for Class II and "warmer" Class I sources, but very cold (Tbol . 100 K) sources have a large range of αIR values. Envelope masses of embedded protostars are listed in Tables 2–4. If the source is associated with a distinct core, the Bolocam identification from Papers I–III is given in the last column. If the source is not associated with one of the originally identified cores, but rather the flux has been "band-filled" at 1.1 mm, then no Bolocam ID is given. In these "band-filled" cases, the measured 1.1 mm flux can be easily re-constructed from the mass. 3.3. Completeness Because we require a detection at 1.1 mm to be in- cluded in the final source lists, we are clearly incom- plete to objects more evolved than Stage I, which do not have a substantial protostellar envelope. We do de- tect a few Class II sources at 1.1 mm; these are dis- cussed in §5.1. The point-source detection limits of our 1.1 mm surveys limit our sensitivity to Class I sources with Menv & 0.09 M⊙ in Perseus, Menv & 0.07 M⊙ in Serpens, and Menv & 0.04 M⊙ in Ophiuchus. These are 5σ point source detection limits; for very extended en- velopes the completeness limits will be higher. For sim- plicity we take a detection limit of 0.1M⊙ for all clouds. As the 1.1 mm detection requirement is more restric- tive than our 24 µm flux criteria, we explore the possibil- ity that we are missing some low luminosity embedded sources that are below our 1.1 mm detection threshold. Taking the 1.1 mm 5σ detection limits for each cloud (75 mJy in Perseus, 50 mJy in Serpens, and 110 mJy in Ophiuchus), and assuming the spectrum of a modified blackbody, Sν = νβBν(TD), with TD = 15 K, we can estimate the minimum detectable bolometric luminosity in each cloud. For β = 1, the minimum Lbol is 0.02 L⊙ in Perseus, 0.01 L⊙ in Serpens, and 0.01 L⊙ in Ophiuchus. Assuming TD = 20 K lowers these values by approxi- mately a factor of 2, while taking β = 2 increases them by a factor of 4. Although these are very rough estimates, they agree fairly well with the lowest observed bolometric luminosities for sources with 1.1 mm detections (0.04 L⊙ in Perseus, 0.05 L⊙ in Serpens, and 0.01 L⊙ in Ophi- uchus). Dunham et al. (2008) and Harvey et al. (2007b) demonstrate that the Spitzer c2d surveys are complete to young objects with luminosities as low as 0.05L⊙. Finally, a comparison of our source list to the ded- icated search for very low luminosity protostars by Dunham et al. (2008) confirms that we are not missing any embedded protostellar sources in Perseus down to the completeness limits of that survey (Lbol & 0.03 − 0.05L⊙). 4. SOURCE CLASSIFICATION To study the early evolution of protostars, it is nec- essary to identify the evolutionary state of the embed- ded candidates in our sample. This is typically ac- complished by classifying sources into discrete groups based on SED characteristics. A number of classifi- cation methods are employed in the literature; most often used are the near- to mid-infrared spectral in- dex αIR = d log(λFλ)/d log(λ) (Lada 1987), the bolo- 8 Enoch et al. metric temperature Tbol (Myers & Ladd 1993, see §3.1), and the ratio of submillimeter to bolometric luminos- ity Lsubmm/Lbol (Andr´e et al. 1993). Generally, Lsubmm is taken to be the integrated luminosity at wavelengths λ ≥ 350 µm. Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 9 Fig. 5.- Distribution of Tbol as a function of the distance to the nearest 1.1 mm core, for candidate embedded protostars in all three clouds. Distances are in units of the 1.1 mm core FWHM size (θ1mm), and symbols are as in Figure 4. Sources within 1.0 × θ1mm of a 1.1 mm core position are considered embedded within that core. There is a clear correlation between smaller distances, or more embedded sources, and lower Tbol values, suggesting that Tbol is a good measure of evolutionary state for deeply embedded sources. For reference, the total numbers of sources in each quadrant of the plot are given in parentheses. 10 Enoch et al. Fig. 6.- Distribution of αIR as a function of the distance to the nearest 1.1 mm core for embedded protostar candidates in all three clouds, similar to Figure 5. While there is some correlation between higher αIR values and smaller distances, it is not as compelling as the correlation observed for Tbol (Figure 5). For reference, the total numbers of sources in each quadrant are given in parentheses. Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 11 Any of these methods must come with the caveat that protostellar mass may affect the classification, which only detailed modeling can resolve (e.g. Hatchell et al. 2007a). We typically have only one flux measurement for λ > 160 µm, so an accurate determination of Lsubmm is not feasible with these data.5 We will focus, therefore, on Tbol and αIR. 4.1. Comparing Classification Methods In Figure 4 we compare classifications based on αIR and Tbol for the candidate embedded protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. Thick symbols indi- cate sources associated with 1.1 mm emission, while thin symbols denote sources with upper limits at 1.1 mm. The spectral index αIR is determined from a least squares fit to all detections between λ = 2µm and λ = 24 µm. The calculation of Tbol is described in §3.1 and §A. We adopt Tbol class divisions from Chen et al. (1995) (see Table 1), and αIR divisions from Andr´e & Montmerle (1994): αIR < 0 (Class I) and αIR > 0 (Class II). No well-defined αIR criteria exists for Class 0 sources, as deeply embedded objects were generally not visible in the mid-IR prior to Spitzer. The two classification methods agree fairly well for Class II and "warmer" Class I sources. Sources with Tbol . 100 K, by contrast, have a wide range of αIR values, and a few of these "cold" sources even fall into Class II based on the spectral index. One of the rea- sons for this large scatter in αIR becomes apparent when examining the SEDs of some deeply embedded sources, which show considerable differences at short wavelengths. Many protostellar SEDs are not monotonically increas- ing from 3.6 to 24 µm, often falling from 5.8 to 8 µm and rising again at longer wavelengths (e.g., Per-emb 18, Per- emb 22, Oph-emb 1; Figure 1). Geometric effects such as scattered light from an outflow cavity or absorption from ices in the protostellar envelope are the most likely cause of these features. In any case, non-monotonic behavior at short wavelengths will clearly bias the calculation of αIR. Calculating αIR from a straight line fit between 2 and 24 µm, rather than a least squares fit, still results in a large range of αIR values at low Tbol. To determine whether αIR or Tbol is a more accurate measure of the true evolutionary state, we look at the cor- relation between both measures and the degree to which a given source is embedded. Figure 5 shows the distri- bution of Tbol with respect to the distance from each protostellar candidate to the nearest 1.1 mm core, in units of the core FWHM size. In all three clouds, es- sentially all sources with Tbol . 200 K are located within one core FWHM of a 1.1 mm peak. Thus the majority of "cold" objects, as defined by low Tbol, appear to be embedded in dense envelopes, and are likely to be at an early evolutionary stage. Furthermore, there is a clear correlation between smaller distance and lower Tbol, sug- gesting that sources with lower Tbol are more embedded than those with higher Tbol. This correlation remains even if we exclude the 1.1 mm flux from the calculation of Tbol, eliminating the possible bias between millimeter 5 It is possible to calculate Lsubmm by assuming a modified blackbody spectrum and a value for β (e.g. Hatchell et al. 2007a), but given the assumptions involved we choose not to pursue this method. cores and Tbol. Thus, if we affiliate the degree of embed- dedness with youth, then Tbol appears to correlate well with evolutionary state. Figure 6 is similar, for αIR; while there is some corre- lation between higher αIR values and smaller distances to the nearest 1.1 mm core, the relationship is not nearly as clear as for Tbol. In particular, there are a number of sources with large αIR values that do not seem to be em- bedded (the distance to the nearest core is much larger than one FWHM), and there are several deeply embed- ded sources with low αIR values. Based on Figures 4–6 and a visual examination of sources with Tbol < 70 K, a number of which are known Class 0 sources, we con- clude that Tbol is more reliable than αIR for classify- ing deeply embedded protostars. Hereafter, Tbol will be used to characterize protostellar sources, and we use the divisions from Chen et al. (1995) and Table 1 to place sources into Class 0, Class I, or Class II. 5. CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASS 0, I, AND II SOURCES The total numbers of Class 0 and Class I sources in each cloud, as defined by Tbol classifications, are given in Table 5. Note that in addition to Tbol, we also require Class I sources to be detected at 1.1 mm. This is not an unreasonable requirement, as our definition of Stage I dictates that they should be detected at millimeter wave- lengths (Menv > 0.1 M⊙). The individual spectra (for λ = 1.25 − 1100 µm) of all Class 0 and Class I sources are shown in Figure 7. Numbers in parentheses in Table 5 are based on clas- sifications using the prismoidal, rather than midpoint, method for calculating Tbol; these give some idea of the uncertainties in the number of Class 0 and Class I sources. Despite the sometimes substantial difference in the midpoint and prismoidal Tbol values for individual sources, there is very little difference in the resulting number of Class 0 and Class I protostars, with the ex- ception of Serpens where the number of Class 0 sources increases from 10 to 14. Statistics for Class II are not given; as we intended to select against sources without a protostellar envelope, we are necessarily incomplete to these objects. For example, there are 46 sources in our original Serpens candidate sample with Tbol > 650 K, while Harvey et al. (2007a) find 132 Class II sources. We do detect a few Class II sources at 1.1 mm, however (see §5.1). The average spectra of Class 0, Class I, and Class II sources in Perseus and Serpens are shown in Figure 8. To calculate the average spectra, individual SEDs are weighted by 1/Lbol, so that we are not biased by the most luminous sources. Error bars in Figure 8 repre- sent the 1σ error in the mean (σλ/√Nλ), but the dis- persion in the sample (σλ) is much larger. Source SED shapes do not fall into discrete bins, but form a con- tinuous distribution between the averages shown. Error bars are large at wavelengths where many sources are not detected (at short wavelengths for Class 0, long wave- lengths for Class II, and 160µm for all classes), and where there are significant variations from source to source. If Ophiuchus sources are included in the average calcu- lation, the resulting average spectra are skewed toward having more flux at short wavelengths, have larger dis- persion, and the similarity of SEDs within each bin is reduced. This behavior suggests that Tbol may be biased 12 Enoch et al. Fig. 7.- Spectral energy distributions of all embedded protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus, including photometry from 2MASS (1.25, 1.65, 2.17 µm), IRAC (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0 µm), MIPS (24, 70, 160 µm), and Bolocam (1.1 mm) data. Also included are SCUBA 450 and 850 µm fluxes from the literature (Sandell & Knee 2001; Kirk et al. 2006) and IRAS 25 or 60 µm fluxes where they are used to replace saturated 24 or 70 µm fluxes (see § 3.1). A sample is shown here; the full figure is available online only. Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 13 Fig. 8.- Average spectra of sources in Class 0, Class I, and Class II, for the Perseus and Serpens samples. Sources are classified based on bolometric temperature, with the additional requirement that Class I sources be detected at 1.1 mm (see Table 1). Individual SEDs are weighted by 1/Lbol in the average calculation. Error bars are the 1σ error in mean, and not the sample dispersion, which is much larger. The Class II spectrum is not necessarily representative of all Class II objects, as we are very incomplete to sources without protostellar envelopes. for many sources in Ophiuchus, likely due to the lack of information at 160 µm, so we exclude Ophiuchus from the average spectra. The progression from Class 0 to Class I to Class II is consistent with a sequence of physical evolution. In particular, the average Class 0 spectrum has the low- est flux densities from 1.25 − 24 µm, as expected for deeply embedded sources with massive, extincting en- velopes, and the highest fluxes at 70 − 1100 µm, where reprocessed protostellar flux is emitted by the cold en- velope. By contrast, the average Class II spectrum is relatively flat, with a much larger percentage of the pro- tostar flux emerging at shorter wavelengths, as expected for older sources without much circumstellar material. One must keep in mind, however, that Tbol is defined such that spectra which peak at longer wavelengths will have a lower Tbol. Large error bars on the average Class 0 spectrum for λ = 1−3 µm are indicative of the widely varying behavior of Class 0 objects in the near-infrared, and the presence of non-monotonic behavior is apparent at λ = 3.6 µm. The large separation between the Class 0 and Class I spectra, as well as the continuous range of SED shapes, suggests that a more continuous means of estimating evo- lutionary status is preferable to the standard classes. 5.1. Class II Sources with 1 mm Emission The average Class II spectrum is not necessarily rep- resentative of all Class II objects, due to severe incom- pleteness to non-embedded sources. The Class II sources we do detect are likely relatively young Stage II objects, before a substantial fraction of disk mass is dispersed or accreted. Given our 1.1 mm sensitivity limit of approximately 0.1 M⊙, almost all sources detected at 1.1 mm will be dense cores or envelopes around relatively young proto- stars. In general, by the time a protostar has consumed or dispersed its massive envelope and enters Stage II (or the T Tauri phase, e.g., Adams et al. 1987), the rem- nant disk of gas and dust has too little mass to be de- tected by our millimeter surveys. Crapsi et al. (2008) define Stage II as sources with a circumstellar mass be- low 0.1 M⊙. Typical measured masses of Class II disks are 0.01 − 0.1 M⊙ (e.g., Beckwith & Sargent 1996), al- though values as large as 1 M⊙ have been measured (Beckwith et al. 1990). In a few a cases we do detect 1.1 mm emission around sources with Class II-type SEDs. These objects have bolometric temperatures Tbol > 650 K and a flux density 14 Enoch et al. at 1.1 mm that is lower than the flux densities from 3.6 to 24 µm. With the exception of two "flat spectrum" ob- jects (−0.3 < αIR < 0.3; Greene et al. 1994), the near- to mid-infrared spectral indices, αIR, of these objects are in the range −0.34 to −1.04, confirming their Class II sta- tus. In some cases, the 1.1 mm emission is unresolved, consistent with a compact disk. Often, however, these Class II sources are in a region of confused millimeter emission, so their physical association with the 1.1 mm emission is not secure. Table 6 lists all Class II sources (650 < Tbol < 2800 K) in each cloud that are detected in our 1.1 mm surveys. Those in confused regions of 1.1 mm emission are indi- cated by a "∗" in the "Bolocam ID" column. Sources with point-like 1.1 mm emission emission centered on the Spitzer position (3 in Perseus, 1 in Serpens, and 3 in Ophiuchus) may have massive disks. 5.2. Individual Sources Here we briefly discuss a few examples of newly- identified or otherwise interesting embedded protostellar sources. 5.2.1. IRAS 03292+3039 IRAS 03292+3039 (Per-emb 2) is a little-studied, Class 0 source associated with the 1.1 mm core Per- Bolo 66; it was discussed briefly in Paper I. An image of IRAS 03292+3039, together with the SED, is shown in Figure 9. Jørgensen et al. (2006) identified this as an outflow source, noting the large-scale outflow visible in the 4.5 µm IRAC band. Bright 1.1 mm emission centered on this object indi- cates a fairly massive protostellar envelope (2.9 M⊙), while the powerful outflow (Walawender et al. 2005; Jørgensen et al. 2006; Hatchell et al. 2007b) and low bolometric temperature (Tbol = 25 K) are evidence of an extremely young, energetic embedded protostar. The spectral energy distribution is similar to well-known Class 0 protostars in Perseus such as NGC 1333-IRAS 4, and nearby IRAS 03282+3035. The small fan-shaped nebulosity visible at 3.6 and 4.5 µm (Figure 9) is most easily explained by a cone-shaped cavity, carved out of the dense envelope by an energetic outflow. The orien- tation of the nebulosity corresponds well to the larger- scale outflow traced by IRAC emission (Jørgensen et al. 2006), which is indicated by thick gray lines in Figure 9. The one-sided nebulosity at 3.6 µm is strikingly similar to the Whitney et al. (2003) model IRAC image of an early Stage 0 sources viewed at an inclination angle of 30o (their Figure 12a). 5.2.2. Per-Bolo 102 Per-Bolo 102 is a bright 1.1 mm source that was iden- tified in the Bolocam survey of Perseus (Enoch et al. 2006). It lies within the region of active star-formation near IC 348, which includes the famous outflow-driving source HH 211 (McCaughrean et al. 1994). The Spitzer 24 µm image resolves the luminous internal source into a double object (Per-emb 16 and Per-emb 28). While the two SEDs are very similar for λ ≥ 8 µm (Figure 9), vari- ations at shorter wavelengths cause Per-emb 16 (Tbol = 56 K) to fall into Class 0, while Per-emb 28 (Tbol = 72 K) falls just outside the Class 0/Class I boundary. These sources are good examples of why a more continuous evolutionary scheme is preferable to the standard clas- sifications. Recently obtained CARMA interferometric observa- tions at λ = 2.7 mm resolve the millimeter core into two sources, coincident with the Spitzer source positions (M. L. Enoch et al., in preparation). The flux ratio at 2.7 mm of the northern (Per-emb 16) to southern (Per- emb 28) source is at least 2:1, further evidence that Per- emb 28 is slightly more evolved. Although not as massive or cold as nearby HH 211 (Per-emb 1) and IC 348-mms (Per-emb 11), Per-Bolo 102 is an interesting case study. It may be a separate-envelope binary system, with two nearly coeval Class 0 or early Class I sources. The sources are separated by 17′′, or 4200 AU. Binary separations of this order are consistent with early fragmentation in a relatively dense cloud ("prompt initial fragmentation", e.g., Pringle 1989; Looney et al. 2000), in which case the individual sources would have distinct protostellar en- velopes. In a binary formed via gravitational fragmentation, we would expect the separation to correspond to the local Jeans length (Jeans 1928): λJ = (cid:18) πc2 GµpmH n(cid:19)1/2 s , (5) where cs is the local sound speed, and µp = 2.33 and n are the mean molecular weight and mean particle density, respectively. A Jeans length of 4200 AU would require a relatively high density (n ∼ 6× 105 cm−3, assuming cs = 0.2 km s−1). The mean density of the Per-Bolo 102 core, measured within an aperture of 104 AU, is 4× 105 cm−3, close to the required value. 5.2.3. Ser-Bolo 33 II One noteworthy example of a Class source associated with 1 mm emission is Ser-Bolo 33 (SSTc2dJ183006.12+004233.8) in Serpens (Figure 9), a very bright Spitzer source with Lbol = 3.6 L⊙, Tbol = 871 K, and compact 1.1 mm emission centered on the Spitzer position. The spectral index, αIR = −0.42, also places this object in Class II. Vieira et al. (2003) included this source in a sample of Herbig Ae/Be candidates, be- lieved to be the intermediate mass Class II counterparts of low-mass T Tauri objects, although the spectral type is F3. The 1.1 mm mass calculated assuming an optically thin disk is 0.17 M⊙, approximately 10% of the stellar mass, M∗ ∼ 1.3 M⊙, estimated from the measured effec- tive temperature (Teff ∼ 6300 K, Vieira et al. 2003) and an empirical Teff − M relation (Habets & Heintze 1981). 6. ALTERNATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS One advantage of such a large sample is that it allows us to define a more continuous evolutionary sequence than the standard classes that were appropriate for the smaller samples previously available. With this in mind, we divide the protostellar sources in each cloud into smaller Tbol bins than those of the standard Class 0/I/II divisions. Average spectra for "early Class 0", "late Class 0", "early Class I", "late Class I", and Class II (see Table 1 for definitions) sources in Perseus and Ser- pens are shown in Figure 10. Error bars represent the 1σ error in the mean, and average spectra are calculated as Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 15 Fig. 9.- Three-color Spitzer images and SEDs of individual sources discussed in §5.2. Images are (8, 24, 70 µm), unless otherwise noted, with 1.1 mm contours. Left: Three-color (3.6, 24, 70 µm) image of IRAS 03292+3039 (Per-emb 2). Fan-shaped nebulosity is visible at 3.6 µm, most likely scattered light from a narrow outflow cavity in this deeply embedded Class 0 source. Thick lines indicate the approximate orientation of the larger-scale outflow (Jørgensen et al. 2006). Center: Per-Bolo 102, a new candidate binary Class 0/I source. Although the SEDs of the two embedded protostars look very similar at λ ≥ 8 µm, the southern source is brighter at shorter wavelengths, fainter at 2.7 mm (see text), and has a slightly higher Tbol. Right: Ser-Bolo 33, a bright Class II object (Table 6). While this is clearly a more evolved source, it is massive enough that we detect 1.1 mm emission from a compact disk. 16 Enoch et al. Fig. 10.- Average spectra in designated Tbol bins (see Table 1), using sources from Perseus and Serpens. The average is calculated as described in Figure 8 and the text, and error bars represent the error in the mean. The progression in SED shape for increasing Tbol is as expected if this represents physical evolutionary sequence. described in the previous section. The largest error bars are seen for the shortest wavelengths in the lowest Tbol bins, where NIR fluxes vary significantly from source to source, likely depending on outflow opening angle and viewing geometry. Binning of Tbol is based on general agreement of SEDs in a given bin, as determined by eye, and should not be interpreted as strict boundaries. While there are significant similarities between the SEDs within each bin, individual source SEDS fill the continuum between the average spectra, and each aver- age spectra lies within the 1σ dispersion of neighboring Tbol bins. The average spectra change as one would ex- pect if an extincting envelope is gradually accreted or dis- persed, with the protostar becoming more visible at short wavelengths. At all wavelengths except 24 and 70 µm, the flux rises or falls monotonically with increasing Tbol. For these intermediate wavelengths, the observed flux may rise initially as hotter dust close to the protostar is revealed, then fall as the mass of circumstellar mate- rial drops. Despite the relatively narrow bins, there is still a rather large change between "late Class 0" and "early Class I", particularly at λ = 3.6 − 24 µm; this transition may occur rapidly, or these wavelengths may be particularly sensitive to geometry. 7. COMPARISON TO MODELS Even for infinitely well-sampled SEDs, spectrum shape is not necessarily directly correlated with age or de- gree of embeddedness. For example, viewing geometry can have a strong effect on SED shape. In three di- mensional radiative transfer models of (Whitney et al. 2003; Robitaille et al. 2006; Crapsi et al. 2008), Stage I and Stage II sources can have quite similar SEDs when viewed at the right inclination angle (e.g., when the ob- server's line-of-sight intersects the outflow opening angle of Stage I sources). Even Stage 0 sources can appear much warmer if we happen to be looking directly into the outflow cavity, although the probability of that oc- curring is small. We compare our spectra to the results of protostel- lar models, which predict protostellar spectra based on source age, mass, accretion rate, etc., both to gain in- sight into the evolutionary state of sources and to eval- uate the effectiveness of such models in matching ob- served sources. Rather than model each source individu- ally, we compare the average spectra from Figure 10 with predicted spectra from Whitney et al. (2003) for "early Stage 0", "late Stage 0" sources, etc. in Figure 11. Whitney et al. (2003) begin with a set geometry for Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 17 Fig. 11.- Comparison of the average observed spectra from Figure 10 with predicted spectra from the protostellar evolution models of Whitney et al. (2003) (plotted as νSν ). Distinct geometries are chosen to represent five evolutionary stages, and include a combination of an accreting protostar, a protostellar disk, envelope, and a bipolar outflow. Colors indicate inclinations angles of the protostellar disk, from 0o (pink) to 90o (dark green). With some exceptions the Stage 0 and Stage II models match the observed spectra fairly well, but the Stage I models over-predict the near-IR and under-predict the mid-IR flux. In general the models tend to underestimate the millimeter flux and thus the mass of the protostellar envelope. 18 Enoch et al. each stage, including some combination of accreting pro- tostar, flared protostellar disk, infalling envelope, bipolar outflow, and grain models for each region, then use ra- diative transfer modeling to predict protostellar spectra. Colors in Figure 11 correspond to inclination angles of the protostellar disk from 0o (pink) to 90o (green), where the outflow is perpendicular to the disk. Model envelope infall rates decline from 10−4 M⊙yr−1 in early Stage 0 to 10−6 M⊙yr−1 in late Stage I. Similarly, the disk radius and cavity opening angle increase and the cavity density decreases as one moves from early Stage 0 to late Stage I. Both models and average observed spectra (thick black lines) are scaled to a total luminosity of 1L⊙. The model early Stage 0 and observed early Class 0 spectra agree fairly well. The observed spectrum lies above most of the models at λ ≤ 24µm, which could be explained by gaps in the inner envelope of some protostars, allowing short wavelength flux to escape (Jørgensen et al. 2005), or a wider outflow angle than the model (5o). The Whitney et al. (2003) models pre- dict that a small fraction (approximately 1/10) of early Stage 0 sources will have spectra similar to Stage I, at very low inclination angles (looking down the outflow). The observed Class II spectrum is also consistent with at least the low inclination models; as we select for sources with 1.1 mm emission it is not unexpected that the ob- served millimeter point is higher than predicted by the models. For late Stage 0 the agreement is again pretty good, except that the model under-predicts the millime- ter flux, and thus the mass of the protostellar envelope, a feature present in all spectra later than early Stage 0. By contrast, the agreement between both Stage I mod- els and the observed average spectra is quite poor. The models severely over-predict the near-IR flux and under- predict the mid-IR flux. In fact, the characteristic double-peaked profile of the Stage I models is almost never seen in the observed spectra (Figure 7). Indebetouw et al. (2006) demonstrate that envelopes with clumpy density distributions can increase the ob- served flux at 10 µm, with short wavelength emis- sion escaping through low opacity regions between the clumps. This kind of clumpy distribution eliminates some of the "double-peaked" structure apparent in the Whitney et al. (2003) models, which assume a smooth density profile in the envelope and constant density in the outflow cavity, although the clumpy models also in- crease the flux at < 3µm. Alternatively, the presence of a larger, thicker protostellar disk could flatten the Stage I spectra by absorbing near-IR flux and producing more mid-IR flux. A foreground cloud could also absorb near- IR flux, without producing any mid-IR flux. It seems that we still do not understand how sources transition from Stage 0 to Stage I, at least in relation to these models. Whether it is the physical model that is unrealistic or how that physical geometry translates to the observed spectra is not clear. It is important to note that the same authors have developed a more com- plete grid of models (Robitaille et al. 2006); we compare here to the earlier models rather than fitting each av- erage spectrum because we want an idea of the global agreement with evolutionary stage. 8. PROTOSTELLAR EVOLUTION 8.1. Luminosity Evolution We examine the evolution of embedded protostars in more detail using the Lbol−Tbol diagram, the protostellar equivalent of the H-R diagram (Myers et al. 1998). Here Tbol is used as a measure of temperature rather than Tef f , which is not well-characterized for embedded sources. As discussed in Myers et al. (1998), newly-formed pro- tostars should begin at low Lbol and Tbol, increasing in both Lbol and Tbol as accretion proceeds. If accretion abates or is otherwise halted, then Lbol will decrease for steadily increasing Tbol. Eventually, sources will move onto the main sequence, at Tbol & 3000 K. Figure 12 plots Lbol versus Tbol for the candidate em- bedded protostar samples in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophi- uchus. Filled and open symbols are used for sources that are associated with 1.1 mm emission, while "+" sym- bols indicate sources with upper limits at 1.1 mm.6 All sources detected at 1.1 mm are further divided accord- ing to whether they have reliable measured 160 µm fluxes (squares), are saturated at 160 µm (circles), or are not detected at 160 µm (triangles). Given the discussion in §A regarding the effect of missing 160 µm fluxes on the calculation of Tbol, circles would be expected to move up and to the right in this diagram for "cold" sources (Tbol . 100 K), and down and to the left for "warm" sources (Tbol & 100 K), if 160 µm fluxes were available. While upper limits at 1.1 mm ("+" symbols) are ex- pected for more evolved sources with Tbol & 500− 600 K, colder sources with no 1.1 mm detection may be ei- ther misclassified (e.g., background galaxies), or very low mass sources whose 1.1 mm flux is below our de- tection limit. Given our physical definition of Stage I (M∗ & Menv; Menv > 0.1M⊙), embedded sources not detected at 1.1 mm must have stellar masses less than a few tenths of a solar mass, or have very little remaining envelope (M∗ ≫ Menv). Protostellar evolutionary tracks, which predict source properties as a function of age and mass, can easily be compared to our data using the Lbol − Tbol diagram. Model tracks from Myers et al. (1998) (solid line; here- after M98) and Young & Evans (2005) (dotted lines; hereafter YE05) are shown in Figure 12. YE05 adopt the standard inside-out collapse model of Shu (1977), and assume that no mass is lost in the formation pro- cess. From top to bottom, the YE05 models are for sources with masses of 3.0, 1.0, and 0.3 M⊙, assuming a constant accretion rate of dM/dt = c3 s/G, where cs is the effective sound speed (Shu 1977). From the initial singular isothermal sphere, finite masses are achieved by truncating the outer radius of the envelope. A one di- mensional radiative transfer model (DUSTY) is used to calculate observational signatures (Lbol, Tbol, etc.) from the accretion model. Unlike YE05, M98 do not assume that that the entire mass of the original core ends up in the final star, but rather that a significant fraction of the core mass is lost in the star formation process. The M98 model shown is for a source with initial core mass of 1.8 M⊙ and final stellar mass of 0.3 M⊙. M98 assume an accretion rate that is initially dM/dt = c3 s/G, but falls off exponentially 6 Note that although we plot sources with 1.1 mm upper limits here, our final embedded protostar samples (Tables 2–4) includes only sources with 1.1 mm detections. Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 19 Fig. 12.- Bolometric luminosity versus bolometric temperature (Lbol − Tbol) diagram for embedded protostar candidates in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. Filled and open symbols indicate that a given source is associated with 1.1 mm emission, while "+" symbols indicate upper limits at 1.1 mm. Symbol are further divided based on whether there is a reliable 160µm measurement, an upper limit, or if we are unable to measure a 160µm flux due to saturation. The right axis shows the mass accretion rate, dM/dt, calculated from Lbol using Eq. 6 and assuming M∗ = 0.5M⊙ and R∗ = 5R⊙. Model evolutionary tracks from Young & Evans (2005) for sources with 3.0, 1.0, 0.3 M⊙ (dotted lines, from top to bottom) and from Myers et al. (1998) for a source with final mass 0.3 M⊙ (solid line) are shown for comparison. The large population of low-luminosity (Lbol < 0.1L⊙) Class I objects argues strongly for episodic accretion by Stage I. with time, designed to match the observed luminosity of pre-main sequence stars at Tbol & 3000 K. Thus, the lu- minosity is significantly lower than the YE05 tracks at later times. Both evolutionary models assume an accret- ing central protostar, a circumstellar accretion disk, an extended envelope, and a contribution to the luminosity from gravitational contraction of the protostar. YE05 also include nuclear (Deuterium) burning. Ignoring for a moment the population of Class I sources in each cloud with Lbol values well below both mod- els, the M98 model, for which a large fraction of the core mass is ejected or dispersed, is more consistent with the observed protostellar sources. The ratio of the fi- nal stellar mass to initial core mass for the M98 model shown (feff = Mcore/Mstar = 0.3/1.8 = 0.17) is smaller than the values (feff = 0.3 ± 0.1) found by Alves et al. (2007) and Enoch et al. (2008) by comparing the shape of the core mass distribution to the initial mass function (feff = 0.3 ± 0.1 and feff & 0.25, respectively). The slightly better match to the M98 model may be irrelevant, however, as neither a constant nor a steadily decreasing accretion rate is consistent with the observed protostellar populations in these clouds; many sources lie below all four model tracks. Our data confirm and exac- erbate the "luminosity problem" noted by Kenyon et al. (1990), that Class I protostars in Taurus were observed to have lower Lbol values than expected based on the av- erage mass accretion rate required to make a 1M⊙ star. In particular, the large population of Class I sources with low Lbol in each cloud is difficult to understand in relation to most existing protostellar evolutionary models. A general feature of such models is that the bolometric luminosity peaks in the Class I stage, a re- sult that is true for constant accretion rates (YE05), decreasing rates (M98), and gravo-turbulent models (Froebrich et al. 2006). In contrast, we find quite similar mean luminosities for the Class 0 and Class I samples: 2.4 L⊙and 2.2 L⊙, respectively. The standard devia- tion for both samples is large: 3.5 L⊙ and 4.7 L⊙ for Class 0 and Class I, respectively. The median luminosity of Class I sources is a factor of 3 lower than the mean, 0.7 L⊙. 8.2. Episodic Accretion Given the above discussion and the large observed spread in Lbol of three orders of magnitude for Class I sources, much larger than the range in envelope masses, we conclude that mass accretion during the Class I stage is episodic. Class I sources with low Lbol can be ex- plained by periods of relative quiescence when the bolo- metric luminosity, which is driven primarily by accre- tion luminosity, drops by at least a factor of 10. Con- versely, Class I sources with high Lbol values, e.g., those that form the upper envelope of the distribution and ap- pear to be consistent with the YE05 models, would cor- respond to periods where the accretion rate is close to the "Shu accretion" value. Approximately 20% of the Class I sources have Lbol < 0.1L⊙ (7/39 in Perseus, 5/25 in Serpens, and 5/25 in Ophiuchus), and could be con- sidered candidate very low luminosity objects (VeLLOs; Dunham et al. 2008; Di Francesco et al. 2007). Episodic accretion is not an unreasonable solution; evidence for variable mass accretion and ejection is plentiful, including that based on modeling FU Orio- 20 Enoch et al. Fig. 13.- Average spectra of low-luminosity Class I sources and "non-envelope Class I" sources (those that have Tbol < 650 K but no 1.1 mm emission). Average Class 0, I, and II spectra from Figure 8 are shown (dashed lines) for reference. The low-Lbol Class I sources have lower short wavelength points relative to the 160 µm and 1.1 mm fluxes, as expected for low accretion rates, but are otherwise consistent with the average Class I spectrum. The average "non-envelope Class I" spectrum is intermediate between the average Class I and Class II spectra, as expected if these sources represent an transitional stage in which there is little or no remaining envelope. nis eruptions (e.g., Hartmann & Kenyon 1985), and bow shocks in Herbig-Haro outflows (e.g., Reipurth & Bally 2001). In traditional models of episodic accretion, infall from the envelope onto the disk is constant and accre- tion from the disk onto the protostar is episodic (e.g., Kenyon & Hartmann 1995), for example due to gravita- tional instabilities in the disk (Vorobyov & Basu 2006). Other scenarios such as the "spasmodic" infall model of Tassis & Mouschovias (2005), where material is held up by the magnetic field at the inner edge of the envelope are also plausible. Although the observed distribution of Lbol for Class I sources argues strongly for episodic accretion, that is not the only possibility. One alternative is that the low-Lbol Class I sources are simply very low mass objects, and we are somehow missing their low-mass Class 0 counter- parts. Based on our sensitivity limits at 70, 160 µm and 1.1 mm, we should be able to detect Class 0 sources with Lbol & 0.05L⊙. The lower limit to the observed Class 0 luminosity, however, may not be the internal luminosity, but heating of the envelope by the interstellar radiation field (ISRF), which can contribute as much as 0.2−0.3L⊙ to Lbol for envelope masses of 1 − 3M⊙ (YE05). For the same reason, a Class 0 source with a very low mass accre- tion rate would not necessarily have a very low bolomet- ric luminosity, making it difficult to determine if episodic accretion is already present at the Class 0 stage. In Figure 13, we show the average spectrum of low- luminosity (Lbol < 0.2L⊙) Class I sources in Perseus and Serpens. On average, these sources have suppressed short wavelength points relative the 160 µm and 1.1 mm fluxes, but are otherwise consistent in shape with the average Class I spectrum.7 The average low-Lbol spec- trum is consistent with low accretion luminosities (evi- dent at short wavelengths) in sources with "normal" en- velope masses, as expected if the low luminosity objects are similar to other Class I sources but with lower mass accretion rates. The characteristics of low luminosity protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus are ana- lyzed in Dunham et al. (2008). 8.3. Mass Accretion Rates Assuming that the bolometric luminosity in Class 0 and Class I is due entirely to accretion, we can estimate the accretion rate from Lbol: , (6) M = dM dt ∼ 2R∗Lbol GM∗ where R∗ and M∗ are the radius and mass of the em- bedded protostar. For the following we assume M∗ = 0.5M⊙ and R∗ = 5R⊙, but accretion rates can be eas- ily scaled for different values of the mass or radius. A mass of 0.5M⊙ is consistent with the initial mass 7 Note that the average spectra are normalized by 1/Lbol, so on an absolute scale the low-Lbol spectrum would be substantially fainter than the Class I spectrum. Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 21 function (e.g Chabrier 2003) and with average YSO masses (Mer´ın et al. 2008; Spezzi et al. 2008); a radius of 3− 5R⊙ is typical for pre-main sequence models of low mass sources (e.g Palla & Stahler 1991; Robitaille et al. 2006). For comparison the "Shu accretion rate" of c3 s/G, which is used in the YE05 models, is approximately 4 × 10−6 M⊙ yr−1 for cs = 0.2 km s−1. The M98 model begins with M ∼ 10−6 M⊙ yr−1, falling to 10−9 M⊙ yr−1 by the time it reaches the main sequence. Making a 1 M⊙ star in 5.4× 105 yr requires an average accretion rate of approximately 2 × 10−6 M⊙ yr−1. The mean luminosity of Class I sources corresponds to M ∼ 1 − 2 × 10−6 M⊙ yr−1, not far from the average required to make a solar mass star. By contrast, the luminosity of the low-Lbol (Lbol ∼ 0.1L⊙) Class I sources implies a mass accretion rate of only 7 × 10−8 M⊙ yr−1, substantially smaller than the Shu value or the average required to make a solar mass star. This result again suggests that either these sources will form very low mass stars (M∗ . 0.05M⊙)8, or that these sources are in a If we suppressed accretion phase of an episodic cycle. define "sub-Shu" accretion to be M . 10−6 M⊙ yr−1, or Lbol . 1L⊙, then approximately 55% of Class I sources are observed to be in such a "sub-Shu" accretion state. If the episodic accretion picture is correct there must be a population of sources with accretion rates much higher than the average; indeed, the highest observed luminosi- ties (Lbol ∼ 10 − 30 L⊙) imply M ∼ 1 − 2 × 10−5 M⊙ yr−1, at least a factor of five higher than the Shu value or the average required to make a 1M⊙ star. Approxi- mately 5% of the Class I sources appear to be in such a M & 10−5 "super-Shu" accretion rate (Lbol > 10L⊙, or M⊙ yr−1. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to determine the duty cycle of the episodic accretion without detailed star for- mation and accretion models. The small fraction of sources observed to have very high accretion rates (5% with M & 10−5 M⊙ yr−1), suggests that periods of rapid accretion must be fairly short lived. Evans et al. (2008) employ a simple accretion model to estimate the time spent in accretion and quiescent phases, finding that half the mass of a 0.5M⊙ star could be accreted during 7% of the Class I lifetime. 8.4. Envelope Mass Evolution Protostellar evolution models also predict the evolu- tion of envelope mass, Menv, with Tbol, as shown in Fig- ure 14. Symbols are similar to Figure 12, with upper limits at 1.1 mm represented by arrows, and solid lines indicating the YE05 evolutionary tracks (3.0, 1.0, and 0.3 M⊙ top to bottom). Some of the higher Tbol sources have high 1.1 mm upper limits because they lie in re- gions of extended or confused emission. Our determina- tion that these sources are not actually associated with the 1.1 mm emission is based on visual examination of the images and SEDs. Sources in all three clouds show a weak but consis- tent trend of decreasing Menv with increasing Tbol, as 8 Although this would require these sources to have a quite low core-to-star formation efficiency of . 10%, as only a few Class 0 sources have envelope masses less than 0.5M⊙. expected if the envelope is gradually depleted by accre- tion onto the protostar. This trend is not a result of in- cluding the 1.1 mm flux, from which the envelope mass is derived, in the calculation of Tbol; the same trend is apparent even if the 1.1 mm point is excluded in the calculation of Tbol. Here, the YE05 model tracks fit the observed Menv − Tbol distribution quite well. Thus, a constant envelope infall rate reproduces the decrease in envelope mass with increasing Tbol, although it does not fit the evolution of Lbol with Tbol (Figure 12). For standard episodic accretion models, where in- fall from the envelope is steady and the accretion rate from the disk to the protostar is the variable quantity (e.g., Kenyon & Hartmann 1995), the envelope mass will steadily decrease with increasing Tbol even for variable accretion. Note that accretion stops when the enve- lope mass, as defined by the outer radius, has been ex- hausted. In the context of the YE05 models, the spread of Menv as a function of Tbol suggests stellar masses in the range M ∼ 0.3 − 4 M⊙ in Perseus and Serpens, and M ∼ 0.1 − 1.5 M⊙ in Ophiuchus. 9. LIFETIME OF THE CLASS 0 PHASE The length of time that sources spend in the Class 0 phase is an important diagnostic of protostellar evolu- tion and how accretion rates evolve with time. If the rate of star formation in these clouds is steady in time (i.e., not occurring in bursts), and if Class 0–Class I– Class II represents a true evolutionary sequence, then we can use the number of objects in consecutive evolu- tionary phases to estimate the relative lifetimes of those phases: t1/t2 = N1/N2. As we ultimately calibrate life- times based on the lifetime of Class II disks (∼ 2×106 yr; Kenyon et al. 1990; Cieza et al. 2007; Spezzi et al. 2008), star formation must have been steady in time for at least the last 2 Myr. In addition, there can be no signifi- cant dependence of the evolutionary timescales on source mass. It is unlikely that all of these assumptions hold in ev- ery star forming region. In fact there is some observa- tional evidence for mass-dependent evolution of dense cores (Hatchell et al. 2008), which could easily translate into mass-dependent evolution after protostar formation. We can, however, hope to mitigate the effects of any breakdowns in our assumptions by utilizing our large sample and averaging over three different environments. In a companion paper (Enoch et al. 2008) we use a similar argument to derive the lifetime of the prestellar phase from the ratio of the number of starless cores to the total number of embedded protostars (Class 0 + Class I). There we find there that the lifetime of dense (n & 104 cm−3) prestellar cores is approximately equal to the life- time of the embedded protostellar phase, or 2−5×105 yr, suggesting that such cores evolve dynamically over a few free-fall timescales. The relative number of Class 0 and Class I sources in each cloud, and the Class 0 lifetime derived from that ratio, is given in Table 5. Given in parentheses are the values resulting from using the prismoidal, rather than midpoint method for determining Tbol; the Class 0 life- time is based on an average of the two methods, and the difference between them, added in quadrature with √N 22 Enoch et al. Fig. 14.- Envelope mass versus bolometric temperature for embedded protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. Filled and open symbols indicate that a given protostar is associated with 1.1 mm emission, while sources with upper limits at 1.1 mm are plotted as arrows. Solid lines show the predictions of protostellar evolutionary models from Young & Evans (2005) for sources of mass (from top to bottom) 3.0, 1.0, 0.3 M⊙. The Young & Evans (2005) models describe the evolution of envelope mass with Tbol quite well, for sources of mass M ∼ 0.3 − 4 M⊙ in Perseus and Serpens, and M ∼ 0.1 − 1.5 M⊙ in Ophiuchus. statistical uncertainties, yields an uncertainty for the life- time. I sources There are approximately half as many Class 0 as Class in both Perseus and Serpens (NClass 0/NClass I = 0.7 and 0.4, respectively), suggest- ing that the Class 0 phase lasts roughly half as long as the Class I phase. We adopt a total embedded phase lifetime of temb = tCl0 + tClI ∼ 5.4 × 105 yr, derived based on the relative number of embedded protostars and Class II sources (Evans et al. 2008). Thus our measured ratios imply Class 0 lifetimes of tClass 0 ∼ 2.2 × 105 yr in Perseus, and 1.7× 105 yr in Serpens. In Ophiuchus there are only 3 or 4 Class 0 sources, resulting in a ratio of NClass 0/NClass I = 0.1 − 0.2 and tClass 0 ∼ 0.7 × 105 yr. Taking all three clouds together, we find a lifetime for the Class 0 phase of 1.72 ± 0.25 × 105 yr. This value is significantly longer than a number of previous estimates of tClass 0 ∼ 104 yr, based both on the number of Class 0 sources in Ophiuchus (Andr´e & Montmerle 1994), and on comparison to evolutionary models (2 − 6 × 104 yr; Froebrich et al. 2006). A short Class 0 lifetime is gen- erally interpreted as evidence for a period of very rapid accretion early on in the evolution of protostars, caus- ing them to quickly reach Stage I, at which point the accretion rate decreases significantly. Our results argue against such a rapid accretion phase. Although accretion may decrease somewhat in Class I (or become episodic, see §8), it appears unlikely that the average accretion rate drops by more than a factor of two from Class 0 to Class I, based on the relative lifetimes of the two phases. Similar mean luminosities for the Class 0 and Class I phases also argue against very high accretion rates in Class 0. Our derived Class 0 lifetime is similar to the results of Visser et al. (2002) for a sample of Lynds dark clouds For example, (tClass 0 ∼ 2 × 105 yr), and to the recent findings of Hatchell et al. (2007a) that the Class 0 lifetime in Perseus is similar to the Class I lifetime (2.5−6.7×105 yr with 95% confidence). Our large, unbiased sample provides a distinct advan- tage over many other previous studies, which have nec- essarily relied on small samples or accumulated sources from a number of different surveys, wavelengths, and detection methods. the Visser et al. (2002) Class 0 sample consists of 7 sources, and the Andr´e & Montmerle (1994) lifetime for Ophiuchus is based on one Class 0 object. Froebrich et al. (2006) note that their 50 Class 0/I sources are selected from a variety of surveys including NIR imaging of outflows, IRAS data, submillimeter and millimeter mapping, and radio contin- uum surveys, causing their source sample to be subject to strong selection effects. Within each cloud our surveys are very uniform, providing protostellar samples that are envelope mass limited and not biased by selection effects. For this reason, our estimated Class 0 lifetimes should be more robust than most previous measurements. The re- cent work by Hatchell et al. (2007a) comparing SCUBA 850 µm maps and Spitzer c2d data of Perseus, with 34 Class 0 sources, is a notable exception. Classifying sources based on T ′bol, calculated from pho- tometry corrected for extinction (see § 3.1.1) results in a somewhat smaller number of Class 0 sources, and a slightly shorter Class 0 lifetime. Table 7 gives the class statistics and corresponding Class 0 lifetime derived us- ing the extinction corrected photometry. The three-cloud average Class 0 lifetime is shorter than when using ob- served photometry, by approximately 35% (t′class 0 = 1.1 × 105 yr). 9.1. Cloud to Cloud Differences: Ophiuchus Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 23 Fig. 15.- Evolution of the bolometric temperature with time, based on estimated lifetimes for four Tbol intervals from Tbol < 50 K to 650 K. Tbol ranges, inferred lifetimes, and uncertainties are taken from Table 8, and plotted as thick gray lines and symbols. The dashed line connects to the Class II lifetime at t = 2×106 yr and Tbol = 2800 K. We fit a simple function to Tbol versus time: Tbol = 25 K+C(t/105 yr)n; the best fit is for Tbol ∝ t1.8. The results in Ophiuchus are strikingly different from Perseus and Serpens, with nearly 10 times more Class I than Class 0 sources. Our results for Ophiuchus are sim- ilar to previously observed ratios of NClass 0/NClass I ∼ 1/10 in that cloud (Andr´e & Montmerle 1994). The de- rived Class 0 lifetime, tClass 0 ∼ 7 × 104 yr, is still sub- stantially longer than the very short tClass 0 ∼ 104 yr found by Andr´e & Montmerle (1994), however. There are two obvious, but conflicting, possible expla- nations for the smaller NClass 0/NClass I ratio in Ophi- uchus. First, the star formation rate may be temporally variable in Ophiuchus. Visser et al. (2002) suggest that a burst of star formation approximately 105 yr ago is re- sponsible for the large ratio of Class I to Class 0 sources. Alternatively, the Class 0 phase may be much shorter in Ophiuchus than in the other two clouds due to higher ac- cretion rates at early times. Were this the case, however, we would expect the mean luminosity to be significantly higher for the Class 0 sources than for the Class I sources, which is not observed. While a burst of star formation seems the more likely explanation, accretion rates, and thus lifetimes, could conceivably depend on cloud envi- ronmental factors such as mean density or turbulent ve- locity. On the other hand, the observed number of Class 0 sources in Ophiuchus may be biased by the dearth of 160 µm flux measurements in that cloud. As discussed in §A, bolometric temperatures are likely overestimated for sources without a 160 µm fluxes, which may cause up to 50% of Class 0 sources to be classified as Class I. The lack of 160 µm fluxes is especially problematic in Ophiuchus, where the majority of sources are either sat- urated at 160 µm or in regions of poor coverage, and may be partially responsible for the small number of observed Class 0 sources. 9.2. Limitations on the Class I Sample Recall that we only include sources in our Class I sam- ple if they are detected at 1.1 mm. This criteria excludes 24 sources from the original candidate protostar sample in Perseus with 70 < Tbol < 650 K, 18 sources in Ser- pens, and 36 in Ophiuchus. The average spectrum of these "non-envelope Class I" sources is shown in Fig- ure 13 (Perseus and Serpens only), and appears to be intermediate between the Class I and Class II averages. Furthermore, the mean Tbol values of the non-envelope Class Is (570 K in Perseus, 520 K in Serpens, and 500 K in Ophiuchus) confirm that they fall at the warm end of the Class I distribution. While it is possible that we are simply not detecting the envelopes of these sources (e.g., if Menv . 0.1 M⊙ or they are very diffuse), we suggest that the transition from Stage I (protostars that retain an envelope) to Stage II (pre-main sequence stars with no envelope) occurs closer to Tbol = 400 − 500 K than the standard Tbol = 650 K, for these data. 24 Enoch et al. When we add the "non-envelope Class I" sources to our Class I samples, dropping the requirement that they be detected at 1.1 mm, the Class 0 to Class I ratio becomes 0.5 in Perseus, 0.3 in Serpens, and 0.07 in Ophiuchus. This represents a 25–30% decrease in the Class 0 lifetime for each cloud. On the other hand, Crapsi et al. (2008) suggest based on protostellar models that up to half of sources observationally classified as Class I may actually be Stage II source with disk inclinations & 65o. Our "non-envelope Class I" objects may be just such sources; if the Crapsi et al. (2008) picture is correct, the observed number of Class I sources likely represents an upper limit to the true number of Stage I protostars. 9.3. Evolution of Tbol with Time In Table 8 we give the number of sources in each cloud in our narrow Tbol bins ("early Class 0", "late Class 0", etc.; §6). The ratio of the total number in each bin, summed over the three clouds, to the total number of embedded protostars is used to derive a lifetime for each Tbol range. The mean Tbol within that range is also given. With the exception of "early Class 0", there is no ev- idence for a difference in the number of sources in each Tbol bin, and little difference in the derived lifetimes. No- tably, 75% of the embedded phase lifetime has elapsed by the time the bolometric temperature reaches 300 K, and the mean Tbol in "Late Class I" (400 K) is skewed toward the lower temperature end of the bin. These features support our earlier suggestion that the divid- ing line between Stage I and Stage II is probably closer to Tbol = 400 − 500 K than to 650 K. Tbol = 50 K is reached at quite early times, which is not unexpected if the temperature scale starts at approximately 10 K with starless cores. With lifetime measurements in several Tbol intervals, together with our previous conclusion that the average accretion rate is approximately constant through the em- bedded phase, we can empirically characterize the evo- lution of Tbol with time. Figure 15 plots the evolution of the bolometric temperature with time, based on val- ues from Table 8. The relationship is clearly non-linear; given the small number of observed points, we fit a simple function to Tbol as a function of time: Tbol = 25 K + C(cid:18) t 105 yr(cid:19)n , (7) where C is constant and we choose 25 K as the tempera- ture at t = 0 because that is the minimum observed Tbol in Class 0. The best fit is for C = 51 K and Tbol ∝ t1.8, indicating a fairly steep evolution with time. The depen- dence on time must flatten out significantly after the em- bedded phase, however, to match the lifetime for Class II (dashed line in Figure 15). 10. CONCLUSIONS Utilizing large-scale 1.1 mm surveys (Enoch et al. 2006; Young et al. 2006; Enoch et al. 2007) together with Spitzer IRAC and MIPS maps from the c2d Legacy program (Evans et al. 2003), we have constructed an unbiased census of deeply embedded protostars in the Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus molecular clouds. Our sample includes a total of 39 Class 0 sources and 89 Class I sources, with approximate detection limits of Menv & 0.1 M⊙ and Lbol & 0.05L⊙ for the envelope mass and bolometric luminosity, respectively. We also detect a few Class II and Herbig Ae/Be candidates at 1.1 mm, most likely evidence of fairly massive proto- planetary disks. Bolometric luminosities, temperatures, and envelope masses are calculated for the candidate Class 0 and Class I sources in each cloud. We compare protostel- lar classification methods, concluding that, for deeply embedded sources, the bolometric temperature Tbol is a better measure of evolutionary state than the near- to mid-infrared spectral index, αIR. We also explore classifying sources into "early Class 0", "late Class I", etc., based on dividing them into nar- rower Tbol bins. Average observed spectra in these bins are compared to model predictions from Whitney et al. (2003) for "early Stage 0", "late Stage 0", etc. In a broad sense the Stage 0 and Stage II models match the observed spectra fairly well. The agreement with both Stage I models is quite poor, however, as the models severely over-predict the near-IR and under-predict the mid-IR flux at this stage, displaying a double-peaked SED that is rarely observed. Observed source properties are compared to pro- tostellar evolutionary models using the bolometric temperature-luminosity (Lbol − Tbol) diagram, the pro- tostellar equivalent of the H-R diagram (Myers et al. 1998). Neither models with a constant mass accretion rate (Young & Evans 2005), nor those with an exponen- tially decreasing rate (Myers et al. 1998) fit the observed sources. In particular, there is a large population of low lu- minosity Class I sources that aggravate the previously noted "luminosity problem" for embedded protostars (e.g. Kenyon et al. 1990). We interpret this result as ev- idence for episodic accretion beginning at least by the Class I phase, and possibly earlier. More than 50% of Class I sources are inferred to have "sub-Shu" mass ac- cretion rates ( M . 10−6 M⊙ yr−1, corresponding to M . 10−7 Lbol . 1L⊙), and approximately 20% have M⊙ yr−1. To build up of order a solar mass in 5.4×105 yr, such sources must also have periods of "super-Shu" ac- cretion ( M & 10−5 L⊙yr−1). Few very high luminosity sources are observed (5%), suggesting that such rapid ac- cretion periods must be short lived. An important caveat to this analysis is that we may sometimes underestimate the luminosity due to missing 70 or 160 µm photometry. Finally, the relative number of Class 0 and Class I sources are used to estimate the lifetime of the Class 0 phases. There are approximately half as many Class 0 as Class I sources in the three cloud sample, implying an average Class 0 lifetime of 1.7 ± 0.3 × 105 yr (1.1 × 105 yr when approximate extinction corrections are applied). This lifetime rules out drastic changes in the mass accre- tion rate from Class 0 to Class I, particularly extremely rapid accretion in Class 0. In Ophiuchus the fraction of Class 0 sources is much smaller. While this difference could be due to the lack of 160 µm flux measurements in Ophiuchus, it may be that either the Class 0 phase is shorter in that cloud (0.7 × 105 yr), or that a burst of star formation is responsible for the large population of Class I objects (e.g. as suggested by Visser et al. 2002). Altogether, the large variation in Class I luminosities, Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 25 similar mean luminosities for the Class 0 and Class I phases, and not dramatically different numbers of Class 0 and Class I sources (at least in Perseus and Serpens) suggests a consistent picture of nearly constant average mass accretion rate through the entire embedded phase (Stage 0 and Stage I), with highly variable episodic ac- cretion turning on by at least early Stage I, and possibly sooner. Understanding embedded protostellar structure and evolution well enough to reproduce the observations with detailed models of spectra and evolution presents an ongoing challenge. The authors thank J. Hatchell, Y. Shirley, and the anonymous referee for comments and suggestions that helped to improve this paper, as well as M. Dunham for many fruitful discussions. We are grateful to B. Whit- ney for sharing the protostellar evolutionary model data used here. We thank the Lorentz Center in Leiden for hosting meetings that contributed to this paper. Part of the work was done while in residence at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics in Santa Barbara, Cali- fornia. Support for this work, part of the Spitzer Legacy Science Program, was provided by NASA through con- tracts 1224608 and 1230782 issued by the Jet Propul- sion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, un- der NASA contract 1407. Additional support was pro- vided by NASA through the Spitzer Space Telescope Fellowship Program and obtained from NASA Origins Grants NNG04GG24G and NNX07AJ72G to the Uni- versity of Texas at Austin. Support for the development of Bolocam was provided by NSF grants AST-9980846 and AST-0206158. REFERENCES Adams, F. C., Lada, C. J., & Shu, F. H. 1987, ApJ, 312, 788 Alves, J., Lombardi, M., & Lada, C. J. 2007, A&A, 462L, 17 Andr´e, P. 1994, The Cold Universe, editors Montmerle, T., Lada, C. J., Mirabel, I. F., & Tran Thanh Van, J. Gif-sur-Yvette, Editions Frontieres, p. 179 Andr´e, P., & Montmerle, T. 1994, ApJ, 420, 837 Andr´e, P., Ward-Thompson, D., & Barsony, M. 1993, ApJ, 406, Hatchell, J., Fuller, G. A., Richer, J. S., Harries, T. J., & Ladd, E. F. 2007a, A&A, 468, 1009 Hatchell, J., Fuller, G. A., & Richer, J. S. 2007b, A&A, 472, 187 Hatchell, J., & Fuller, G. 2008, A&A, in press (preprint: arXiv:0803.1064 [astro-ph]) Herbig, G. H. & Kameswara, R. N. 1972, ApJ, 174, 401 Indebetouw, R., Whitney, B. A., Johnson, K. E., & Wood, K. 122 Aspin, C., Sandell, G., & Russell, A. P. G. 1994, A&AS 106 165 Beckwith, S. V. W. & Sargent, A. I. 1996, Nature, 383, 139 Beckwith, S. V. W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., & Gusten, R. 1990, AJ, 99, 924 Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763 Chen, H., Myers, P. C., Ladd, E. F., & Wood, D. O. S. 1995, ApJ, 445, 377 Cieza, L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 667, 308 Cohen, M. & Kuhli, L. V. 1979, ApJS, 41, 743 Crutcher, R. M. 1999, ApJ, 520, 706 Crapsi, A., van Dishoeck, E. F., Hogerheijde, M. R., 2006, ApJ, 636, 362 Jayawardhana, R., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N. 2001, ApJ, 548, 310 Jeans, J. H. 1928, Astronomy and Cosmogony, p. 340. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press Jørgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., Myers, P. C., Schoier, F. L., van Dishoeck, E. F., Wilner, D. J. 2005, ApJ, 631, L77 Jørgensen, J. K., Harvey, P. M., Evans, N. J., II, Huard, T. L., Allen, L. E., Porras, A., Blake, G. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 1246 Jørgensen, J. K., Johnstone, D., Kirk, H., & Myers, P. C. 2007, ApJ, 656, 293 Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2008, ApJ, in press (preprint: Pontoppidan, K. M., & Dullemond, C. P. 2008, A&A, in press arXiv:0805.0599) Di Francesco, J., Evans, N. J., II, Caselli, P., Myers, P. C., Shirley, Y., Aikawa, Y., & Tafalla, M. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, editors B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil, p. 17 Dunham, M. M., Crapsi, A., Evans, N. J., II, Bourke, T. L., Huard, T. L., Myers, P. C., & Kauffmann, J., 2008, ApJS, in press (preprint: arXiv:0806.1754) Ebert, R. 1955, Zeitschrift Astrophysics, 37, 217 Enoch, M. L., Young, K. E., Glenn, J., Evans, N. J., II, Golwala, S., Sargent, A. I., Harvey, P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 293 Enoch, M. L., Glenn, J., Evans, N. J., II, Sargent, A. I., Young, K. E., & Huard, T. L. 2007, ApJ, 666, 982 Enoch, M. L., Evans, N. J., II, Sargent, A. I., Glenn, J., Rosolowsky, E., & Myers, P. C., ApJ, 684, 1240 Evans, N. J., II, Allen, L. E., Blake, G. A., Boogert, A. C. A., Bourke, T., Harvey, P. M., Kessler, J. E., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 965 Evans, N. J., II, et al. 2007, Final Delivery of Data from the c2d Legacy Project: IRAC and MIPS Evans, N. J., II, et al. 2008, ApJ, submitted Froebrich, D., Schmeja, S., Smith, M. D., & Klessen, R. S. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 435 Greene, T. P., Wilking, B. A., Andr´e, P., Young, E. T., & Lada, C. J. 1994, ApJ, 434, 614 Greene, T. P. & Young, E. T. 1992, ApJ, 395, 516 Habets, G. M. H. J., & Heintze, J. R. W. 1981, A&A, 46, 193 Hartmann, L., & Kenyon, S. J. 1985, ApJ, 299, 462 Harvey, P. M., Chapman, N., Lai, S.-P.. Evans, N. J., II, Allen, L. E., Jørgensen, J. K., Mundy, L. G., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 307 Harvey, P. M., Merin, B., Huard, T. L., Rebull, L. M., Chapman, N. Evans, N. J., II, & Myers, P. C. 2007a, ApJ, 663, 1149 Harvey, P. M., Rebull, L. M., Brooke, T., Spiesman, W. J., Chapman, N., Huard, T. L., Evans, N. J., II, et al. 2007b, ApJ, 663, 1139 Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. W. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117 Kenyon, S. J., Hartmann, L. W., Strom, K. M., & Strom, S. E. 1990, AJ, 99, 869 Kirk, H., Johnstone, D., & DiFrancesco, J. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1009 Lada, C. J. 1987, in IAU Symp. 115, Star Forming Regions, editors M. Peimbert & J. Jugaku (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 1 Lada, C. J., & Lada, E. A. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 57 Looney, L. W., Mundy, L. G., & Welch, W. J. 2000, ApJ, 529, 477 Mer´ın, B., et al. 2008, ApJ, in press (preprint: arXiv:0803.1504) McCaughrean, M. J., Rayner, J. T., & Zinnecker, H. 1994, ApJ, 436, L189 McKee, C. F., & Zweibel, E. G. 1992, ApJ, 399, 551 Myers, P. C., Adams, F. C., Chen, H., Schaff, E. 1998, ApJ, 492, 703 Myers, P. C., & Ladd, E. F. 1993, ApJ, 413, 47 Natta, A., Testi, L., Calvet, N., Henning, Th., Waters, R., & Wilner, D. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, editors B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil, p. 767 Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, Th. 1994, A&A, 291, 943 Palla, F. & Stahler, S. W. 1991, ApJ, 375, 288 Pringle, J. E. 1989, MNRAS, 239, 361 Rebull, L. M., et al. 2007, ApJS, 171 447 Reipurth, B., & Bally, J. 2001, ARA&A, 39, 403 Robitaille, T. P.. Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., Wood, K., & Denzmore, P. 2006, ApJS, 167, 256 Sandell, G. & Knee, L. B. G. 2001, ApJ, 546, L49 Shirley, Y. L., Evans, N. J., II, & Rawlings, J. M. C. 2002, ApJ, 575, 337 Shu, F. H. 1977, ApJ, 214, 488 Spezzi, L., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1295 Spitzer, L. Jr. 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium, New York: Wiley, p. 282 Tassis, K., & Mouschovias, T. Ch. 2005, ApJ, 618, 783 26 Enoch et al. Vieira, S. L. A., Corradi, W. J. B., Alencar, S. H. P., Mendes, L. T. S., Torres, C. A. O., Quast, G. R., Guimaraes, M. M., & da Silva, L. 2003, AJ, 126, 2971 Visser, A. E., Richer, J. S., & Chandler, C. J. 2002, AJ, 124, 2756 Vorobyov, E. I. & Basu, S. 2006, ApJ, 650, 956 Walawender, J., Bally, J., Kirk, H., & Johnstone, D. 2005, AJ, 130, 1795 Walker, C. K., Lada, C. J., & Young, E. T. 1986, ApJ, 309, L47 Ward-Thompson, D. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 493 Ward-Thompson, D., Andr´e, P., Crutcher, R., Johnstone, D., Onishi, T., & Wilson, C. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, editors B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil, p. 33 Whitney, B. A., Wood, K., Bjorkman, J. E., & Cohen, M. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1079 Wu, J., Dunham, M. M., Evans, N. J. II, Bourke, T. L., & Young, C. H., 2007, AJ, 133, 1560 Young, C. H. & Evans, N. J., II 2005, ApJ, 627, 293 Young, C. H., Shirley, Y. L., Evans, N. J., II, & Rawlings, J. M. C. 2003, ApJS, 145, 111 Young, K. E., Enoch, M. L., Evans, N. J., II, Glenn, J., Sargent, A., Huard, T. L., Aguirre, J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 326 Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 27 TABLE 1 Definition of Classes and Stages Class/Stage definition Class 0 Class I Class II Early Class 0 Late Class 0 Early Class I Late Class I non-envelope Class I Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Tbol ≤ 70 K 70 K< Tbol ≤ 650 K; 1.1 mm detection (Menv & 0.1M⊙) 650 K< Tbol ≤ 2800 K Tbol ≤ 50 K 50 K < Tbol ≤ 100 K 100 K < Tbol ≤ 300 K 300 K < Tbol ≤ 650 K 70 K< Tbol ≤ 650 K; no 1.1 mm detection (Menv . 0.1M⊙) M∗ < Menv M∗ > Menv; Menv ≥ 0.1M⊙ circumstellar disk; Menv < 0.1M⊙ . Bolometric temperatures, luminosities, and envelope masses of embedded protostars in Perseus TABLE 2 ID c2d name/position (SSTc2dJ...) Tbol (K) Lbol (L⊙) Class 0 αIR Menv M⊙) Bolocam ID Other Names Per-emb 1 Per-emb 2 Per-emb 3 Per-emb 4 Per-emb 5 Per-emb 6 Per-emb 7 Per-emb 8 Per-emb 9 Per-emb 10 Per-emb 11 Per-emb 12 Per-emb 13 Per-emb 14 Per-emb 15 Per-emb 16 Per-emb 17 Per-emb 18 Per-emb 19 Per-emb 20 Per-emb 21 Per-emb 22 Per-emb 23 Per-emb 24 J034356.53+320052.9 J033217.95+304947.6 J032900.52+311200.7 J032839.10+310601.8 J033120.96+304530.2 J033314.40+310710.9 J033032.68+302626.5 J034443.94+320136.1 J032951.82+313906.1 J033316.45+310652.5 J034356.85+320304.6 J032910.50+311331.0 J032912.04+311301.5 J032913.52+311358.0 J032904.05+311446.6 J034350.95+320324.8 J032739.09+301303.0 J032911.25+311831.3 J032923.49+313329.5 J032743.23+301228.8 J032910.68+311820.5 J032522.33+304514.0 J032917.16+312746.4 J032845.30+310542.0 24 (5) 25 (2) 30 (4) 31 (3) 33 (1) 36 (5) 37 (4) 40 (6) 41 (2) 47 (14) 49 (15) 51 (17) 54 (18) 54 (14) 56 (16) 56 (17) 59 (11) 59 (12) 60 (3) 60 (14) 63 (12) 63 (11) 66 (18) 67 (10) 1.5 (0.4) 1.3 (0.2) 0.69 (0.15) 0.22 (0.03) 1.2 (0.2) 0.64 (0.01) 0.15 (0.06) 3.0 (0.5) 0.46 (0.01) 0.27 (0.66) 0.45 (0.85) 4.2 (4.4) 1.6 (2.0) 0.49 (0.32) 0.53 (0.67) 0.38 (0.62) 4.2 (0.1) 2.8 (1.7) 0.36 (0.05) 1.7 (0.01) 2.8 (1.9) 1.7 (1.1) 0.29 (0.33) 0.43 (0.01) 0.5 (0.18) 1.07 (0.11) 2.16 (0.1) 1.68 (0.06) 0.98 (0.06) 2.22 (0.06) 2.08 (0.07) 0.96 (0.07) 3.44 (0.11) 1.73 (0.09) 1.37 (0.09) 2.58 (0.08) 0.55 (0.06) 2.41 (0.13) 1.43 (0.06) 1.51 (0.06) 2.68 (0.06) 1.94 (0.06) 1.51 (0.06) 2.39 (0.06) 1.95 (0.06) 2.34 (0.07) 1.75 (0.06) 1.11 (0.05) 3.02 (0.08) Bolo 103 2.88 (0.08) Bolo 66 0.29 (0.03) Bolo 41 0.36 (0.02) Bolo 30 0.95 (0.04) Bolo 65 Bolo 79a 1.04 (0.1) 0.99 (0.08) Bolo 62 0.63 (0.06) Bolo 116a 0.64 (0.04) Bolo 59 1.57 (0.16) Bolo 79a 1.78 (0.04) Bolo 104 7.75 (0.78) Bolo 48a 3.66 (0.37) Bolo 48a Bolo 48a 0.5 (0.05) 1.16 (0.12) Bolo 46 1.15 (0.11) Bolo 102a 0.51 (0.03) Bolo 22 2.47 (0.07) Bolo 49b 0.64 (0.05) Bolo 57 0.5 (0.03) Bolo 23 2.47 (0.07) Bolo 49b 1.41 (0.14) Bolo 5 0.5 (0.05) Bolo 52 0.19 (0.02) Bolo 33a HH 211 IRAS 03292+3039 IRAS 03282+3035 IRAS 03267+3128 IC 348-MMS NGC 1333-IRAS 4A NGC 1333-IRAS 4B NGC 1333-IRAS 4C RNO 15-FIR L1455-IRS 4 L 1448-IRS2 28 Enoch et al. TABLE 2 – Continued ID c2d name/position (SSTc2dJ...) Per-emb 25 Per-emb 26 Per-emb 27c J032637.46+301528.0 J032538.82+304406.3 J032855.56+311436.6 Per-emb 28 Per-emb 29 Per-emb 30 Per-emb 31 Per-emb 32 Per-emb 33 Per-emb 34 Per-emb 35 Per-emb 36 Per-emb 37 Per-emb 38 Per-emb 39 Per-emb 40 Per-emb 41 Per-emb 42 Per-emb 43 Per-emb 44c Per-emb 45 Per-emb 46 Per-emb 47 Per-emb 48 Per-emb 49 Per-emb 50d Per-emb 51 Per-emb 52 Per-emb 53 Per-emb 54d Per-emb 55 Per-emb 56 Per-emb 57 Per-emb 58 Per-emb 59 Per-emb 60 Per-emb 61 Per-emb 62 Per-emb 63 Per-emb 64 Per-emb 65 Per-emb 66 J034351.02+320307.9 J033317.85+310932.0 J033327.28+310710.2 J032832.55+311105.2 J034402.40+320204.9 J032536.48+304522.3 J033015.12+302349.2 J032837.09+311330.7 J032857.36+311415.7 J032918.27+312320.0 J033229.18+310240.9 J033313.78+312005.2 J033316.66+310755.2 J033320.30+310721.3 J032539.10+304358.0 J034202.16+314802.1 J032903.76+311603.7 J033309.57+310531.2 J032800.40+300801.3 J032834.50+310051.1 J032738.23+301358.8 J032912.94+311814.4 J032907.76+312157.2 J032834.53+310705.5 J032839.72+311731.9 J034741.56+325143.9 J032901.57+312020.7 J034443.33+320131.4 J034705.42+324308.4 J032903.33+312314.6 J032858.44+312217.4 J032835.04+302009.9 J032920.07+312407.5 J034421.33+315932.6 J034412.98+320135.4 J032843.28+311733.0 J033312.85+312124.1 J032856.31+312227.8 J034345.15+320358.6 Tbol (K) 68 (12) 69 (7) 69 (1) 72 (25) 76 (20) 78 (6) 80 (13) 84 (29) 90 (18) 99 (13) 103 (26) 106 (12) 106 (21) 115 (21) 125 (47) 132 (25) 157 (72) 163 (51) 176 (42) 188 (9) 197 (93) 221 (7) 230 (17) 238 (14) 239 (68) 254 (23) 263 (115) 278 (119) 287 (8) 304 (63) 309 (64) 312 (1) 313 (200) 322 (88) 341 (179) 363 (240) 371 (107) 378 (29) 436 (9) 438 (8) 440 (191) 542 (110) Lbol (L⊙) αIR Menv M⊙) Bolocam ID Other Names 0.95 (0.02) 4.4 (1.5) 19.0 (0.4) 1.09 (0.05) 2.16 (0.06) 3.03 (0.12) Bolo 18 0.5 (0.08) 1.87 (0.19) Bolo 10a 2.81 (0.28) Bolo 38a L 1448-C NGC 1333-IRAS 2A Class I 0.28 (0.37) 1.8 (2.5) 1.7 (0.01) 0.16 (0.01) 0.16 (0.31) 4.3 (3.7) 1.6 (0.1) 9.1 (0.3) 5.3 (1.0) 0.07 (0.35) 0.54 (0.01) 0.04 (0.08) 1.5 (1.0) 0.17 (0.36) 0.68 (0.85) 0.07 (0.06) 32.5 (7.1) 0.05 (0.06) 0.3 (0.07) 1.2 (0.1) 0.87 (0.04) 1.1 (0.7) 10.0 (3.0) 0.07 (0.1) 0.16 (0.21) 4.7 (0.9) 6.2 (2.6) 1.8 (0.8) 0.54 (0.09) 0.09 (0.45) 0.63 (0.47) 0.04 (0.06) 0.28 (1.05) 0.24 (0.16) 1.8 (0.4) 1.9 (0.4) 3.2 (0.6) 0.16 (0.16) 0.69 (0.22) -0.28 (0.06) 3.33 (0.06) 1.93 (0.05) 0.78 (0.05) 1.53 (0.06) 2.62 (0.07) 1.7 (0.05) 2.35 (0.08) 1.6 (0.06) 1.26 (0.06) 0.4 (0.05) 1.44 (0.06) 1.57 (0.05) 0.88 (0.05) 2.36 (0.06) 1.47 (0.05) 1.21 (0.08) 1.13 (0.05) 0.95 (0.05) 0.83 (0.05) -0.19 (0.05) 1.05 (0.05) 2.18 (0.1) 0.54 (0.05) 0.57 (0.05) 0.78 (0.05) 2.09 (0.08) 0.5 (0.05) 0.36 (0.05) 1.13 (0.05) 0.83 (0.05) 0.15 (0.05) 0.42 (0.05) 0.21 (0.05) 0.37 (0.05) 0.36 (0.05) 0.41 (0.05) -0.14 (0.05) -0.22 (0.05) 0.62 (0.06) Bolo 102a 3.84 (0.09) Bolo 80 0.59 (0.06) Bolo 84 0.19 (0.02) Bolo 25 0.63 (0.02) Bolo 106 4.47 (0.45) Bolo 8 0.46 (0.07) Bolo 60 0.44 (0.04) Bolo 29 0.74 (0.07) Bolo 38a 0.44 (0.04) Bolo 54a 0.45 (0.08) Bolo 68 0.41 (0.04) Bolo 78 1.12 (0.11) 1.5 (0.15) Bolo 81 1.82 (0.18) Bolo 10a 0.07 (0.02) 3.25 (0.32) Bolo 43 0.21 (0.02) 0.17 (0.02) 0.12 (0.02) 0.34 (0.04) Bolo 21 0.77 (0.08) Bolo 49a 1.62 (0.16) Bolo 47 0.24 (0.04) Bolo 28 0.49 (0.05) Bolo 31a 1.67 (0.08) Bolo 122 1.87 (0.19) Bolo 42 0.32 (0.03) Bolo 116a 0.14 (0.02) 0.11 (0.02) 0.71 (0.07) Bolo 40 0.14 (0.02) Bolo 27 0.52 (0.05) Bolo 54a 0.17 (0.02) Bolo 113 0.12 (0.02) 0.25 (0.02) Bolo 31a 0.53 (0.07) Bolo 76 0.25 (0.02) 0.24 (0.02) B1-c L 1448-N IRAS 03271+3013 NGC 1333-IRAS 1 B1-a B1-b SVS 13A IRAS 03254+3050 L1455 FIR2 ASR 30 B5-IRS1 NGC 1333-IRAS 6 IRAS 03415+3152 IRAS 03439+3233 h NOTE – The envelope mass Menv is calculated from the 1.1 mm flux assuming a dust temperature TD = 15 K. Bolocam IDs are from Papers I–III, and indicate that the protostellar source is within 1.0 core FWHM of a given Bolocam core. If no ID is listed, the source was not originally identified as a distinct 1.1 mm core, but there is detectable (& 3σ) 1.1 mm emission at the position of the source. Uncertianties for Tbol, Lbol, and Menv are given in parentheses; uncertainties for Tbol and Lbol are taken to be the difference of values calculated by the midpoint and prismoidal methods (see §A). Uncertainties in Menv are from the photometric errors in the total flux only. Absolute uncertainties in the mass may be a factor of 2 or more, from uncertainties in d, κ1mm and TD, but relative values should be much more accurate. a More than one protostar is associated with this Bolocam core or source is in a crowded region; mass is based on flux measured in a 30 − 40′′ diameter aperature. b More than one protostar is associated with this Bolocam core; mass is based on dividing Bolocam core flux equally (source separation is less than 30′′). 60µm fluxes. c Saturated 24µm flux has been replaced with IRAS 25µm flux for the calculation of Lbol and Tbol. d Saturated at either 24µm or 70µm so Lbol is likely an underestimate, but the IRAS beam is too confused to measure reliable 25µm or Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 29 Bolometric temperatures, luminosities, and envelope masses of cold protostars in Serpens TABLE 3 ID c2d name/position (SSTc2dJ...) Tbol (K) Lbol (L⊙) αIR Menv (M⊙) Bolocam ID Other Names Ser-emb 1 Ser-emb 2 Ser-emb 3 Ser-emb 4 Ser-emb 5 Ser-emb 6 Ser-emb 7 Ser-emb 8b Ser-emb 9 Ser-emb 10c,d Ser-emb 11 Ser-emb 12b Ser-emb 13 Ser-emb 14 Ser-emb 15 Ser-emb 16d Ser-emb 17 Ser-emb 18 Ser-emb 19 Ser-emb 20b Ser-emb 21 Ser-emb 22 Ser-emb 23 Ser-emb 24 Ser-emb 25 Ser-emb 26 Ser-emb 27b Ser-emb 28d Ser-emb 29 Ser-emb 30 Ser-emb 31 Ser-emb 32 Ser-emb 33e Ser-emb 34 J182909.24+003132.3 J182952.44+003611.7 J182854.84+002952.5 J183000.72+011301.4 J182854.84+001832.6 J182949.56+011521.9 J182854.12+002929.9 J182948.12+011644.9 J182855.92+002944.7 J182845.12+005203.5 J182906.72+003034.3 J182952.08+011547.8 J182902.04+003120.6 J183005.40+004104.5 J182954.24+003601.3 J182844.76+005125.7 J182906.36+003043.2 J182952.80+011456.0 J183000.00+011311.6 J182949.20+011619.8 J182951.00+011640.6 J182957.48+011300.5 J182957.84+011251.4 J183000.00+011158.9 J182851.24+001927.3 J182958.92+011426.2 J182956.76+011446.5 J182844.04+005337.9 J183002.88+011228.2 J182957.84+011405.7 J182931.92+011842.9 J183005.76+003931.7 J182916.08+001822.7 J182902.76+003009.5 Class 0 39 (2) 42 (10) 51 (12) 54 (16) 56 (12) 56 (12) 58 (13) 58 (16) 66 (21) 1.6 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) 2.6 (0.1) 1.2 (1.6) 0.16 (0.1) 11.0 (6.0) 3.1 (0.1) 2.1 (2.4) 0.34 (0.63) Class I 75 (14) 77 (12) 85 (9) 86 (31) 100 (32) 101 (43) 110 (26) 117 (21) 120 (15) 129 (29) 131 (3) 141 (37) 157 (39) 190 (23) 249 (64) 250 (106) 303 (139) 322 (25) 360 (244) 374 (101) 560 (85) 430 (15) 431 (207) 437 (10) 631 (410) 1.09 (0.05) 1.9 (1.2) 2.6 (1.2) 0.05 (0.09) 0.08 (0.1) 0.17 (0.27) 0.04 (0.6) 1.5 (1.3) 1.2 (0.8) 2.0 (1.9) 4.4 (2.1) 1.7 (1.5) 2.6 (2.2) 3.1 (1.5) 1.8 (1.2) 0.06 (0.07) 0.62 (0.73) 5.8 (1.7) 0.19 (1.5) 2.2 (1.3) 13.8 (4.2) 5.3 (1.0) 0.05 (0.07) 1.7 (0.2) 0.12 (0.28) 2.27 (0.08) 0.77 (0.05) 1.91 (0.06) 1.68 (0.08) 0.9 (0.06) 2.65 (0.07) 1.36 (0.06) 1.37 (0.06) 1.89 (0.06) 1.33 (0.06) 1.66 (0.06) 1.54 (0.06) 0.24 (0.06) 1.3 (0.07) -0.18 (0.06) 1.07 (0.05) 1.7 (0.06) 1.49 (0.05) 2.57 (0.06) 3.8 (0.11) 1.04 (0.05) 1.01 (0.05) 0.67 (0.05) 1.15 (0.05) 0.45 (0.05) 0.46 (0.05) 0.3 (0.05) 0.45 (0.05) 0.21 (0.05) 0.28 (0.09) 0.26 (0.05) -0.39 (0.05) -0.07 (0.05) -0.14 (0.05) 1.16 (0.02) Bolo 15 0.54 (0.03) Bolo 24a 1.54 (0.15) Bolo 8a 2.56 (0.03) Bolo 28a 0.24 (0.02) Bolo 7a 7.98 (0.07) Bolo 23a 1.67 (0.17) Bolo 8a 3.72 (0.37) Bolo 22a 1.19 (0.12) Bolo 8a 0.29 (0.03) Bolo 3a 1.39 (0.14) Bolo 14a 1.23 (0.12) Bolo 23a 0.17 (0.02) 0.19 (0.02) 0.48 (0.05) Bolo 24a 0.24 (0.02) Bolo 3a 1.38 (0.14) Bolo 14a 0.74 (0.07) Bolo 23a 2.56 (0.03) Bolo 28a 1.53 (0.15) Bolo 22a 1.84 (0.18) Bolo 22a 2.35 (0.24) Bolo 25a 1.06 (0.11) Bolo 25a 1.14 (0.11) Bolo 29 0.16 (0.02) Bolo 7a Bolo 26a 2.0 (0.2) 0.69 (0.07) 0.26 (0.03) Bolo 2 1.32 (0.13) Bolo 28a Bolo 26a 1.9 (0.19) 2.12 (0.07) Bolo 20 0.2 (0.02) Bolo 32 0.54 (0.04) Bolo 17 0.22 (0.02) Bolo 13 FIRS1 S68N IRAS 1862+0050 SMM 10 IR IRAS 18274+0112 IRAS 18267+0016 Note. - Columns are as in Table 2, and uncertainties for Tbol, Lbol, and Menv are given in parentheses. a More than one protostar is associated with this Bolocam core or source is in a crowded region; mass is based on flux measured in a 30 − 40′′ diameter aperature. b Saturated at either 24µm or 70µm so Lbol is likely an underestimate, but the IRAS beam is too confused to measure reliable 25µm or 60µm fluxes. c Missing 70µm flux has been replaced with IRAS 60µm flux for the calculation of Lbol and Tbol. d Source lies outside the 70µm map. e Saturated 24µm flux has been replaced with IRAS 25µm flux for the calculation of Lbol and Tbol. 30 Enoch et al. TABLE 4 Bolometric temperatures, luminosities, and envelope masses of cold protostars in Ophiuchus ID c2d name/position (SSTc2dJ...) Tbol (K) Lbol (L⊙) αIR Menv (M⊙) Bolocam ID Other Names Oph-emb 1 Oph-emb 2a Oph-emb 3 J162821.72-243623.4 J163222.56-242831.8 J162625.80-242428.8 35 (2) 54 (8) 57 (10) 0.25 (0.01) 6.9 (1.2) 0.41 (0.15) 1.23 (0.06) 5.03 (0.2) 1.65 (0.07) 0.51 (0.04) Bolo 26 1.16 (0.02) Bolo 36 0.24 (0.02) Bolo 9 IRAS 16253-2429 IRAS 16293-2422B VLA 1623 (?) Class 0 Oph-emb 4 Oph-emb 5 Oph-emb 6 Oph-emb 7 Oph-emb 8c,d Oph-emb 9 Oph-emb 10 Oph-emb 11 Oph-emb 12 Oph-emb 13c Oph-emb 14c Oph-emb 15 Oph-emb 16c,d Oph-emb 17 Oph-emb 18 Oph-emb 19 Oph-emb 20 Oph-emb 21c Oph-emb 22 Oph-emb 23 Oph-emb 24 Oph-emb 25 Oph-emb 26 Oph-emb 27 Oph-emb 28 J163136.84-240419.9 J162721.96-242727.7 J162705.40-243629.5 J163151.96-245725.9 J162621.48-242304.2 J162625.44-242301.3 J163200.96-245642.7 J162717.64-242856.2 J162724.48-244103.1 J162728.08-243933.4 J162727.00-244050.5 J163152.32-245536.1 J162709.36-243718.4 J163135.76-240129.2 J162857.72-244054.8 J162728.44-242720.8 J162706.84-243815.0 J162702.16-243727.1 J162640.56-242714.4 J162648.48-242838.6 J162737.08-244237.8 J163143.68-245524.6 J162730.24-242743.2 J162739.96-244314.8 J162721.60-244143.0 Class I 77 (25) 87 (28) 106 (14) 124 (39) 133 (34) 135 (49) 145 (38) 190 (1) 191 (30) 193 (31) 211 (7) 240 (42) 257 (60) 290 (18) 304 (96) 309 (85) 310 (23) 331 (2) 372 (160) 428 (84) 438 (87) 496 (68) 528 (99) 551 (54) 595 (57) 0.18 (0.05) 0.08 (0.08) 0.15 (0.09) 0.1 (0.13) 18.3 (1.4) 0.1 (0.3) 2.7 (0.3) 0.52 (0.06) 0.33 (0.16) 7.2 (0.5) 3.8 (0.7) 0.13 (0.07) 17.9 (0.6) 1.5 (0.1) 0.03 (0.03) 0.47 (0.28) 0.6 (0.16) 5.2 (1.3) 0.06 (0.09) 0.12 (0.05) 0.13 (0.06) 0.28 (0.09) 0.93 (0.27) 0.74 (0.15) 1.2 (0.2) -0.27 (0.05) -0.05 (0.05) 1.27 (0.05) 0.82 (0.05) 1.46 (0.09) 0.87 (0.05) 1.39 (0.07) 0.25 (0.05) 1.01 (0.05) 2.29 (0.11) 1.17 (0.08) 1.07 (0.05) 1.69 (0.15) 0.14 (0.05) 0.67 (0.05) -0.03 (0.05) 0.61 (0.05) 1.53 (0.11) 0.45 (0.05) 0.02 (0.05) 0.13 (0.05) 0.23 (0.05) -0.12 (0.05) -0.15 (0.05) -0.03 (0.05) 0.03 (0.01) 0.12 (0.01) Bolo 17 0.09 (0.01) Bolo 14b 0.05 (0.01) Bolo 33 0.22 (0.02) Bolo 5 0.53 (0.05) Bolo 8 0.05 (0.01) Bolo 35 0.07 (0.01) 0.12 (0.01) Bolo 18b 0.11 (0.01) 0.36 (0.04) Bolo 18b 0.08 (0.01) 0.07 (0.01) Bolo 14b 0.14 (0.02) Bolo 30 0.04 (0.01) 0.29 (0.03) Bolo 20b 0.05 (0.01) Bolo 13 0.08 (0.01) 0.06 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) 0.19 (0.02) Bolo 20b 0.04 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) LFAM26/GY197 GSS 30 GY 30 L1689S/IRS67 CRBR85 IRS 44/GY269 ) IRS 43/GY265 EL 29/GY214 IRAS 16295-2355 IRS45/GY273 WL17/GY205 WL16/GY182 GY91/CRBR42 WL2/GY128 GY301 IRS47/GY279 IRS51/GY315 IRS42/GY252 Note. - Columns are as in Table 2, and uncertainties for Tbol, Lbol, and Menv are given in parentheses. a Oph-emb 2 is saturated at 160µm; when the 100µm IRAS flux is included the resulting Lbol is 16 ± 6L⊙, consistent with the luminosity calculated by Walker et al. (1986) when scaled to a distance of 125 pc. b More than one protostar is associated with this Bolocam core or source is in a crowded region; mass is based on flux measured in a 30 − 40′′ diameter aperature. c Saturated 24µm flux has been replaced with IRAS 25µm flux for the calculation of Lbol and Tbol. d Saturated 70µm flux has been replaced with IRAS 60µm flux for the calculation of Lbol and Tbol. Numbers of Protostars by Class and the Class 0 lifetime TABLE 5 Cloud NClass0 NClassI NClass0/NClassI Perseus Serpens Ophiuchus 27 (27) 9 (13) 3 (4) Three cloud sample 39 (44) 39 (41) 25 (23) 25 (24) 89 (88) 0.70 (0.66) 0.4 (0.6) 0.12 (0.17) 0.44 (0.50) τClass0 (yr) 2.2 ± 0.4 × 105 1.7+0.5 −0.9 × 105 0.7+0.4 −0.5 × 105 1.72 ± 0.25 × 105 Note. - Numbers of Class 0 and Class I sources are based on Tbol classifications (Table 1) including the requirement that Class I sources be detected at 1.1 mm. Numbers in parentheses indicate how the results change if we utilize a different method for calculating Tbol (prismoidal versus midpoint integration, see §A). The Class 0 lifetime, τClass0, assumes that the entire embedded phase lasts for 5.4×105 years (τemb = τClass0 +τClassI = 5.4×105 yr; Evans et al. 2008), and NClass0/(NClass0 +NClassI ) = τClass0/τemb. The lifetime is calculated using the average of the two NClass0/NClassI ratios given, and the uncertainty is from the difference between them added in quadrature with the √N uncertainties from counting statistic. Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 31 Class II sources detected at 1.1 mm in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus TABLE 6 c2d name/position (SSTc2dJ...) Tbol (K) Lbol (L⊙) αIR a M1mm (M⊙) Bolocam IDb other names J032747.66+301204.6 J034400.00+320154.1 J032900.00+312146.8 J034109.13+314438.0 J032856.64+311835.6 J034548.27+322411.8 J032917.66+312245.1 662 (15) 700 (17) 856 (26) 873 (30) 993 (22) 1096 (23) 1297 (22) J182900.00+003003.1 J183006.12+004233.9 J182900.96+002931.6 J182901.32+002933.0 J182901.68+002954.6 J182901.68+002946.5 J163151.96-245615.7 J162658.56-244531.6 J162624.00-241613.4 J163945.36-240203.8 J162623.28-242100.7 806 (5) 871 (2) 892 (2) 892 (6) 1158 (3) 1212 (5) 690 (71) 824 (14) 958 (35) 970 (30) 1080 (100) 2.80 (0.05) 1.60 (0.03) 0.33 (0.01) 1.70 (0.06) 0.42 (0.01) 5.00 (0.09) 1.50 (0.02) 0.19 (0.01) 3.60 (0.01) 1.20 (0.01) 0.36 (0.01) 1.80 (0.01) 0.70 (0.01) 1.2 (0.3) 1.3 (0.1) 1.9 (0.2) 0.84 (0.09) 2.0 (0.4) Perseus -0.09 (0.05) -0.34 (0.05) -0.83 (0.05) -0.72 (0.05) -0.78 (0.05) -0.72 (0.05) -0.77 (0.05) Serpens -0.61 (0.05) -0.42 (0.05) -0.42 (0.05) -0.54 (0.05) -1.04 (0.05) -0.65 (0.05) Ophiuchus -0.17 (0.05) -0.45 (0.05) -0.71 (0.05) -0.73 (0.05) -0.62 (0.05) 0.82 (0.06) Per-Bolo 24 0.40 (0.04) Per-Bolo 106∗ 0.90 (0.09) Per-Bolo 40∗ 0.16 (0.02) Per-Bolo 90 0.10 (0.02) Per-Bolo 39∗ 0.10 (0.02) Per-Bolo 120 0.19 (0.02) Per-Bolo 54∗ RNO 15c (1) LkHα 353 (2) IRAS 03380+3135 ASR 120 (3) LkHα 330 (2) LkHα 270 (2) 0.35 (0.03) 0.17 (0.01) 0.23 (0.02) 0.23 (0.02) 0.23 (0.02) 0.25 (0.02) Ser-Bolo 13∗ Ser-Bolo 33 Ser-Bolo 13∗ Ser-Bolo 13∗ Ser-Bolo 13∗ Ser-Bolo 13∗ ∗ 0.05 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.15 (0.01) Oph-Bolo 7∗ CoKu Ser G3 (4) CoKu Ser G4 (4) GY 186 (5) GY 20 (5) Note. - References: (2) Herbig & Kameswara 1972; (3) Aspin et al. 1994; (4) Cohen & Kuhi 1979; (5) Greene & Young 1992. a The 1.1 mm mass (M1mm) is calculated for an optically thin disk and a dust temperature of TD = 15 K. Our assumption for the dust opacity may be incorrect for typical Class II disks, however, where grain growth is a possibility (e.g., Natta et al. 2007). b Bolocam IDs with "*"s indicate that the source is in a confused region at 1.1 mm, and the association of the Spitzer object with the given 1.1 mm emission is not secure. c Typically classified as a Class I source, RNO 15 has a bolometric temperature just above the Class I cutoff in our sample. The spectral index of RNO 15 is αIR = −0.09, placing it in the "flat spectrum" category, or close to the Class I boundary. Effect of Extinction Corrections on Class Statistics TABLE 7 Cloud NClass0 NClassI NClass0/NClassI Perseus Serpens Ophiuchus Three cloud sample 21 4 3 29 42 26 20 88 0.5 0.15 0.15 0.33 τClass0 (yr) 1.5 × 105 0.6 × 105 0.6 × 105 1.1 × 105 Note. - Same as Table 5 but for classifications based on T ′ bol, the extinction- corrected bolometric temperature. In addition, an embedded phase lifetime of 4.4 × 105 yr is assumed, derived based on extinction-corrected classifications (Evans et al. 2008). TABLE 8 Lifetimes for narrow Tbol bins Phase Tbol range N(Per) N(Ser) N(Oph) (K) Early Class 0 T < 50 Late Class 0 50 < T < 100 Early Class I 100 < T < 300 Late Class I 300 < T < 650 11 23 19 13 2 11 12 9 1 4 12 11 N(total)/ N(emb,tot) 14/128 = 0.11 38/128 = 0.30 43/128 = 0.34 33/128 = 0.26 Mean Tbol Lifetime (K) 40 70 180 400 (yr) 0.6 × 105 1.6 × 105 1.8 × 105 1.4 × 105 Note. - For each Tbol bin, N(total) is the total number of sources in all three clouds; N(emb,tot) is the total number of embedded protostars in the three cloud sample (128). Only sources detected at 1.1 mm are included. The mean Tbol of protostars in a given Tbol range is also given. Lifetimes are calculated from N(total)/N(emb, tot)×5.4×105 yr. Cloud-to-cloud variations are typically 0.2−0.3×105 yr. 32 Enoch et al. APPENDIX CALCULATING THE BOLOMETRIC LUMINOSITY AND TEMPERATURE Determination of the bolometric temperature and luminosity of any given source can depend strongly on the method used to approximate the integrations over frequency in equations 1–3. As Sν is sampled at a finite number of frequencies (usually 6 to 10 here), the SED must be interpolated over the intermediate frequencies. Here we use two different methods; the first (midpoint) method utilizes a simple linear interpolation for the midpoint flux, while the second (prismoidal) method calculates a color temperature for each pair of flux points, and uses a modified blackbody based on that color temperature to estimate the midpoint flux density. In both cases the SED is extrapolated from the longest wavelength flux using Sν ∝ ν2, and flux upper limits are removed from the fit (i.e., we interpolate over them). Examples of the midpoint and prismoidal interpolations are shown in Figure 16 for two sources with Class 0-like (left) and Class I-like (right) SEDs. Fig. 16.- Examples of the interpolated midpoints used for the integration of the SED in the midpoint (solid line) and prismoidal (dashed line) methods. Observed data points are overlaid as diamonds. A typical Class 0 source is shown on the left, and a Class I source on the right; both sources shown are lacking data at 160 µm. After the midpoint is calculated, the integration for both methods is done in linear νSν space. The prismoidal method provides a good approximation of the dust emission peak for cold sources (left), but probably overestimates the long-wavelength flux for warmer, flatter SED sources (right), resulting in a bias toward lower Tbol. Figure 17 compares the results of using the midpoint and prismoidal methods to calculate Lbol and Tbol for the embedded protostar sample in Perseus. The midpoint and prismoidal Tbol values agree fairly well, usually to within 20%, with no strong systematic bias. There is some tendency for the prismoidal Tbol to be lower for colder sources. On the other hand, Lbol calculated by the prismoidal method is generally higher than the midpoint Lbol. To further test this behavior, we plot in Figure 18 the fractional errors due solely to finite sampling, for Lbol and Tbol calculated from input blackbody spectra. Blackbody sources with input Tbol from 5–5000 K are sampled at the observed wavelengths (λ =1.25, 1.65, 2.17, 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8, 24, 70, 160, 1100 µm), and the bolometric temperature and luminosity calculated by the midpoint (left) and prismoidal (right) methods. Both Lbol and Tbol have typical errors of approximately 20%, and the measured Tbol is consistently over-estimated by approximately 20%. The midpoint Tbol is more variable but somewhat more accurate than the prismoidal Tbol, while Lbol is somewhat less accurate. Of course, the blackbody spectra tested here are not necessarily representative of the more complicated observed SEDs. Based on Figures 17–18 and on examinations of the midpoint and prismoidal fits to observed SEDs, from which we find that the prismoidal method often provides a poor fit to "flatter" SEDs at long wavelengths (Figure 16), we use the midpoint method throughout this paper. Differences between the midpoint and prismoidal methods are often used as a measure of uncertainty. In general, measured 160 µm fluxes are uncertain by up to a factor of 2, due to unquantified saturation effects Protostars in Serpens, Perseus, and Ophiuchus 33 Fig. 17.- Comparison of the midpoint and prismoidal methods for calculating Lbol and Tbol, for sources in Perseus. Left: Midpoint and prismoidal Tbol (black asterisks) and Lbol (triangles) values are plotted for all candidate embedded protostars in Perseus. Right: Fractional difference between the midpoint and prismoidal methods, plotted as (midpoint-prismoidal)/prismoidal. The two methods generally agree to within 20% for Tbol but Lbol calculated by the prismoidal method is higher than the midpoint Lbol by as much as 100%. There is some tendency for the prismoidal Tbol to be lower for colder sources. and calibration uncertainties, and in many cases we are unable to measure a 160 µm flux at all. In addition, the "point-source" 160 µm fluxes of extended sources will likely be underestimated, because they are measured with a PSF fit rather than aperture photometry. Missing or severely underestimated fluxes at 160 µm can significantly affect both Lbol and Tbol for cold sources that peak near 100 µm. As we are primarily interested in the coldest sources, we attempt here to quantify the effects of missing or underestimated 160 µm flux. One way of approaching this problem is to examine sources for which we have additional information near the peak of the SED, e.g., from IRAS or SHARC 350 µm observations (Wu et al. 2007). We first look at two example sources, one cold (IRAS 03282+3039; Tbol ∼ 33 K), and one warmer (Tbol ∼ 163 K). IRAS 03282+3039 is isolated, so we can use the IRAS fluxes without worrying about confusion due to the large IRAS beam. We calculate the "true" Lbol and Tbol by including the IRAS 60 and 100 µm fluxes, a SHARC II 350 µm flux, and a MIPS 160 µm flux measured in a large aperture, which is almost two times higher than the PSF-fit flux. Using the underestimated point source 160 µm flux, and no longer including IRAS or SHARC II data, causes an underestimate of Lbol by 35% and an overestimate of Tbol by 15% compared to the "true" values. Omitting the 160 µm point altogether, as would be appropriate for saturated sources, results in an underestimate of Lbol by 7% and an overestimate of Tbol by 9%. Thus we conclude that while the 160 µm point is important for characterization of the SED of embedded objects, our integration method can interpolate over a missing 160 µm flux to estimate Lbol and Tbol to within 20% for cold sources. Severely underestimated 160 µm flux densities will cause larger errors of up to 50%. Using a similar procedure for the warmer source (Tbol = 163 K), we find that omitting the 160 µm flux results in errors in the opposite sense compared to the colder source: an overestimate of Lbol by 28% and an underestimate of Tbol by 18%. For a more general result, we compare Tbol calculated with the 160 µm flux included in the SED to the value found by omitting the 160 µm point, for all sources in Perseus with a measured 160 µm flux (Figure 19, left panel). For this plot, we have adopted classifications from Chen et al. (1995), as discussed in §4. Although Tbol calculated without the 160 µm flux is always overestimated compared to Tbol calculated with the 160 µm flux, it is never a large enough effect to shift the source classification of objects with Tbol & 100 K (e.g., from Class I to Class II). This is not the case for Class 0 sources, however, as can be seen in the right panel of Figure 19, where the scale has been adjusted to highlight the lowest Tbol values. Five sources that have Tbol < 70 K (Class 0) when including the 160 µm flux are shifted to 650 < Tbol > 70 K (Class I) when the 160 µm flux is omitted. If a published 350 µm flux is available (diamonds), the errors in Tbol resulting from excluding the 160 µm flux are almost completely eliminated. Based on Figures 17–19 and the above examples, we estimate overall uncertainties for measured Lbol and Tbol values of 20 − 50%, depending on whether or not a 160 µm flux is available. If we are unable to measure a 160 µm flux, Tbol 34 Enoch et al. Fig. 18.- Characterization of sampling errors for Tbol and Lbol calculated using the midpoint (left) and prismoidal (right) methods. The fractional difference between the input (Tbol,Lbol) of blackbody spectra and the measured values when SEDs are sampled at the observed wavelengths is plotted as a function of the input Tbol. Both Lbol and Tbol have typical errors of approximately 20%, and the measured Tbol is consistently over-estimated by approximately 20%. Source SEDs, which are considerably more complex than the blackbodies tested here, may behave differently. Fig. 19.- Characterization of the systematic errors introduced into the measured Tbol when a 160 µm flux is not available. Left: For all sources in Perseus with a reliable 160 µm flux, we calculate Tbol with and without the 160 µm point (asterisks). Tbol is always overestimated when the 160 µm flux is missing, but it does not change the classification of Class I sources for these data. Right: Similar, but with the scale adjusted to highlight lower Tbol sources. Not having a 160 µm point does change the classification of approximately half of the Class 0 (Tbol < 70 K) sources. Errors are substantially reduced when a flux at 350 µm is available (diamonds). will almost certainly be an overestimate for very cold sources, which may affect our classification of the most deeply embedded protostars.
astro-ph/0412006	1	0412	2004-11-30T23:22:12	X-ray and Radio Monitoring of GX 339-4 and Cyg X-1	[ "astro-ph" ]	Previous work by Motch et al. (1985) suggested that in the low/hard state of GX339-4, the soft X-ray power-law extrapolated backward in energy agrees with the IR flux level. Corbel and Fender (2002) later showed that the typical hard state radio power-law extrapolated forward in energy meets the backward extrapolated X-ray power-law at an IR spectral break, which was explicitly observed twice in GX339-4. This has been cited as further evidence that jet synchrotron radiation might make a significant contribution to the observed X-rays in the hard state. We explore this hypothesis with a series of simultaneous radio/X-ray hard state observations of GX339-4. We fit these spectra with a simple, but remarkably successful, doubly broken power-law model that indeed requires a spectral break in the IR. For most of these observations, the break position as a function of X-ray flux agrees with the jet model predictions. We then examine the radio flux/X-ray flux correlation in Cyg X-1 through the use of 15 GHz radio data, obtained with the Ryle radio telescope, and Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer data, from the All Sky Monitor and pointed observations. We find evidence of `parallel tracks' in the radio/X-ray correlation which are associated with `failed transitions' to, or the beginning of a transition to, the soft state. We also find that for Cyg X-1 the radio flux is more fundamentally correlated with the hard, rather than the soft, X-ray flux.	astro-ph	astro-ph	X-ray and Radio Monitoring of GX 339−4 and Cyg X-1 Michael Nowak Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Chandra X-ray Science Center Abstract. Previous work by Motch et al. (1985) suggested that in the low/hard state of GX 339−4, the soft X-ray power-law extrapolated backward in energy agrees with the IR flux level. Corbel and Fender (2002) later showed that the typical hard state radio power-law extrapolated forward in energy meets the backward extrapolated X-ray power-law at an IR spectral break, which was explicitly observed twice in GX 339−4. This has been cited as further evidence that jet synchrotron radiation might make a significant contribution to the observed X-rays in the hard state. We explore this hypothesis with a series of simultaneous radio/X-ray hard state observations of GX 339−4. We fit these spectra with a simple, but remarkably successful, doubly broken power-law model that indeed requires a spectral break in the IR. For most of these observations, the break position as a function of X-ray flux agrees with the jet model predictions. We then examine the radio flux/X-ray flux correlation in Cyg X-1 through the use of 15 GHz radio data, obtained with the Ryle radio telescope, and Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer data, from the All Sky Monitor and pointed observations. We find evidence of 'parallel tracks' in the radio/X-ray correlation which are associated with 'failed transitions' to, or the beginning of a transition to, the soft state. We also find that for Cyg X-1 the radio flux is more fundamentally correlated with the hard, rather than the soft, X-ray flux. 1. Introduction Both Cyg X-1 and GX 339−4 in their spectrally hard, radio-loud states have served as canonical examples of the so-called 'low state' (or 'hard state') of galactic black hole candidates [16, 14]. In this state the X-ray spectrum is reasonably well-approximated by a power-law with photon spectral index of Γ ≈ 1.7, with the power-law being exponentially cutoff at high energies (≈ 100 keV). Such spectra have been attributed to Comptonization of soft photons from an accretion disk by a hot corona; however, it recently has been hypothesized that the X-ray spectra of hard state sources might instead be due to synchrotron and synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) radiation from a mildly relativistic jet [10, 12]. Jet models have been prompted in part by multi-wavelength (radio, optical, X-ray) observations of hard state systems. In hard states of GX 339−4, the 3 -- 9 keV X-ray flux (in units of 10−10 erg cm−2 s−1) is related to the 8.6 GHz radio flux (in mJy) by Fx ≈ 0.46F 1.42 [2]. This correlation was seen to hold over several decades in X-ray flux, and also to hold for two hard state epochs that were separated by a prolonged, intervening soft state outburst. r c(cid:13) 2018 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.1 2 Michael Nowak It further has been suggested that the Fx ∝ F 1.4 correlation is a universal property of the low/hard state of black hole binaries [5]. This specific power-law dependence of the radio flux upon the X-ray flux naturally arises in synchrotron jet models [3, 2, 12, 7], where the optically thin synchrotron spectrum, occurring above an IR spectral break, is presumed to continue all the way through the X-ray. r Interestingly, nearly 20 years ago Motch et al. (1985) [13] noted that for a set of simultaneous IR, optical, and X-ray observations of the GX 339−4 hard state, the extrapolation of the X-ray power-law to low energy agreed with the overall flux level of the optical/IR data. Corbel and Fender (2002) [1] reanalyzed these observations (which did not include simultaneous radio data), as well as a set of (not strictly simultaneous) radio/IR/X-ray observations from the 1997 GX 339−4 hard state. They showed that the low energy extrapolation of the X-ray power-laws, and the high energy extrapolation of the radio power-law, coincided with a spectral break in the IR. 2. Observations of GX 339−4 We consider a set of ten simultaneous radio/X-ray observations of GX 339−4, eight of which come from the 1997 or 1999 hard state [17, 14] and and two of which come from the 2002 hard state [8]. All X- ray observations were performed with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE). Note that five of these observations are further labeled A -- E, as we single these out for special discussion. A and B occurred immediately after the 1999 soft-to-hard state transition [14] and have optically thin radio spectra (αr < 0). C has a very 'inverted' radio spec- trum (see below). D has only a single radio point, and hence we cannot extrapolate its radio power-law without making further assumptions. E has the brightest X-ray flux in our sample, and is one of the brightest hard X-ray states observed in GX 339−4 to date. To analyze the X-ray spectra of these observations, RXTE response matrices were created using the software tools available in HEASOFT 5.3, which we find yield extremely good agreement between the Propor- tional Counter Array (PCA) and High Energy X-ray Timing Explorer (HEXTE) when fitting power-law models to the Crab pulsar plus neb- ula system. This is true for both the power-law normalization and slope, both of which must be determined very accurately when extrapolating over large energy ranges. The radio data for observation E were obtained with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) at 4.8 GHz and 8.6 GHz. The radio mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.2 Monitoring of GX 339−4 and Cyg X-1 3 Obs. E (40031−03−01) Soft−to−Hard X−ray Break Figure 1. Unfolded spectra of an X-ray spectrum of GX 339−4 fit with an absorbed, exponentially cutoff, broken power-law and a gaussian line. Residuals are from the proper forward folded model fit. data for observation D were also obtained with ATCA, but only at 5 GHz. All other radio data can be found in [14]. 3. A Rant on the Nature of Evil The observations were analyzed with the Interactive Spectral In- terpretation System (ISIS) [9]. For our purposes, there are several major reasons for our use of ISIS. Data input without a response matrix (i.e., the radio data) are automatically presumed to have an associated diagonal response with one cm2 effective area and one second integration time. We convert the radio data from mJy to photon rate in narrow bands around the observation frequencies, and use this as input for the simultaneous radio/X-ray fits. The other major reason for using ISIS is that it treats 'unfolded spectra' (shown in Fig. 1) in a model-independent manner. The un- folded spectrum in an energy bin denoted by h is defined by: Funfold(h) = ([C(h) − B(h)]/∆t)/(R R(h, E)A(E)dE), where C(h) is the total de- tected counts, B(h) is the background counts, ∆t is the integrated observation time, R(h, E) is the unit normalized response matrix de- scribing the probability that a photon of energy E is detected in bin h, mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.3 4 Michael Nowak Obs. E (40031−03−01) B Radio−to−Soft X−ray Break E D C 2 C1 Figure 2. Left: An unfolded, simultaneous radio/X-ray observation of GX 339−4, fit with an absorbed, exponentially cutoff, doubly broken power-law and a gaussian line. Right: Results of broken power-law fits to GX 339−4, showing the location of the break between the radio and soft X-ray power-law as a function of X-ray flux. Dashed lines show the approximate integrated X-ray flux and approximate IR spectral break energy previously observed in GX 339−4 (Corbel & Fender 2002). Dotted lines are Eb−r ∝ Fx 0.38, Eb−r ∝ Fx 0.74. and A(E) is the detector effective area at energy E. Contrary to un- folded spectra produced by XSPEC, this definition produces a spectrum that is independent of the fitted model. Any unfolded spectrum should be considered something of a sin; however, ISIS unfolded spectra are only venial sins, whereas XSPEC unfolded spectra should rightly be classified as cardinal sins (dictum vel factum vel concupitum contra legem aeternam). In Fig. 1, however, the plotted residuals are those obtained from a proper forward-folded fit. 4. Radio-to-X-ray Break Energy Correlations We obtain surprisingly good fits for nine of the ten radio/X-ray spectra using the following simple model (using the ISIS/XSPEC model defini- tions): absorption (the phabs model, with NH fixed to 6 × 1021 cm2) and a high energy, exponential cutoff (the highecut model) multiplying a doubly broken power-law (the bkn2pow model, with the first break being in the far IR to optical regime, and the second break being constrained to the 9 -- 12 keV regime) plus a gaussian line (with energy fixed at 6.4 keV). When considering just the X-ray spectra, a singly broken power-law fits all ten spectra, with better results than any of the Comptonization models that we have tried. In Fig. 2 we show the fitted radio-to-X-ray break location as a function of 3 -- 9 keV integrated flux. We also show in this figure the approximate integrated 3 -- 9 keV flux and the IR break location for the mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.4 Monitoring of GX 339−4 and Cyg X-1 5 1997 observation discussed by Corbel and Fender (2002) [1]. For our GX 339−4 observations of comparable 3 -- 9 keV flux, the doubly broken power-law models do indeed produce a break in the IR. The model fits presented here have predicted radio-to-X-ray breaks ranging all the way from the far IR to the blue end of the optical (and into the X-ray, if one also considers observation B, which has an 'optically thin' radio spectrum). The data point labeled C1, with a break in the far IR, has an ex- tremely 'inverted' radio spectrum (αr = 0.58). This drives the fitted break to low energies, and hence leads to deviations from the overall observed trends shown in Fig. 2. Such an inverted spectrum is very unlikely to be intrinsic to the radio jet, and is most likely a signature of free-free absorption at low frequencies [4]. If we instead consider only the highest observed radio frequency (8.6 GHz, which is likely less affected by free-free absorption), and fix the radio spectral slope at this point to αr = 0.1, similar to the other observations, we obtain an IR break frequency (labeled C2) that is consistent with the other inferred breaks. To assess the correlation of radio-to-X-ray break energy with inte- grated X-ray flux, we exclude the data points from observation C (likely free-free absorbed), observation B (which has an optically thin radio spectrum), and observation D (which is consistent with the trends if we assume a radio slope of αr = 0.1). A regression fit to the remaining six data points suggests that the radio-to-X-ray break energy, in eV, scales with the 3 -- 9 keV integrated flux as 0.95Fx 0.74±0.05. Using the scale invariance Ansatz to describe the jet physics [7, 6], we show elsewhere [15] that the predicted scaling between the integrated X-ray synchrotron flux and the radio-to-X-ray break frequency where the jet becomes optically thin to synchrotron self-absorption scales as 2(p+6)/(p+4)/(p+5), where p is the power-law index of the electron νb ∝ Fx spectrum, and we have used for the X-ray spectral slope αx = (1 − p)/2 from standard synchrotron theory. For the usual range of −0.65 < to νb ∝ F 0.38 αx < −0.5 of synchrotron spectra, we obtain νb ∝ F 0.36 . This prediction is flatter than the observed dependence of extrapolated break frequency upon X-ray flux. However, if one also excludes the highest flux point, then the scaling becomes more consistent with the jet synchrotron prediction, i.e., νb ∝ Fx 0.38±0.16 (Fig. 2). x x 5. Radio/X-ray Correlations in Cyg X-1 We now turn to radio/X-ray observations of Cyg X-1 [16, 5]. Again, these spectra are remarkably well-fit by a simple, exponentially cut- mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.5 6 Michael Nowak Figure 3. Left: Unfolded spectra of an X-ray spectrum of Cyg X-1 fit with an absorbed, exponentially cutoff, broken power-law and a gaussian line. Right: Corre- lation of the soft X-ray spectral slope with the hard minus soft X-ray slope for all our Cyg X-1 observations. off broken power-law (Fig. 3). The degree of the break here indicates that the broken power-law models are not simply mimicking reflection, but are suggesting two separate continuum components. In fact, the correlation between the soft X-ray slope and the hard minus soft X- ray slope is more pronounced than any correlation between reflection fraction and spectral slope (Fig. 3). We shall elaborate upon these point further in an upcoming paper (Wilms et al., in prep.). The associated radio data are 15 GHz observations performed at the Ryle Telescope, Cambridge (UK) [16]. (These are single channel obser- vations, so a radio spectral slope cannot be determined.) Most of these observations have occurred simultaneously with pointed RXTE obser- vations [16], and nearly all have very good contemporaneous coverage by the RXTE All Sky Monitor (ASM ). In Fig. 4 we plot the daily average ASM count rate vs. the daily average 15 GHz flux. Ranging from approximately 10 -- 50 cps in the ASM there is a clear log-linear correlation between the radio flux and the ASM count rate. As for GX 339−4, the radio flux rises more slowly than the ASM count rate (Fr scales approximately as the 0.8 power of the ASM count rate). Cyg X-1, however, shows much more scatter in the amplitude of the correlation than does GX 339−4. As noted elsewhere [5], there is a sharp roll-over for higher ASM count rates. However, one can clearly discern on the shoulder of this roll-over (i.e., the upper right corner of Fig. 4) four 'spokes', consisting of 2 -- 5 data points each. In these spokes, the radio/X-ray correlation appears to hold to high count rates. We have confirmed [15] that each of these times are associated with 'failed transitions' to the soft state mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.6 Monitoring of GX 339−4 and Cyg X-1 7 Figure 4. Left: 15 GHz Ryle radio flux (mJy) vs. Cyg X-1 daily mean ASM count rate. Right: 20 -- 200 keV flux (units of 10−9 ergs cm s−1) vs. the daily average 15 GHz Ryle radio flux (mJy) for pointed observations of Cyg X-1. [16], except for the lowest amplitude of these spokes, which occurs immediately preceding a prolonged soft state outburst. In Fig. 4 we also plot the daily average ASM count rate vs. the 20 -- 200 keV flux from our pointed RXTE observations taken during the same 24 hour period [16]. We see that hard X-ray/ASM correlation traces a similar pattern to the radio/ASM correlation. Indeed, when we plot the hard X-ray flux vs. the daily average radio flux we obtain a log-linear relationship, as shown in Fig. 4. In Cyg X-1, the radio flux density appears fundamentally to be tied to the hard X-ray emission. 6. Summary We have considered ten simultaneous RXTE/radio hard state observa- tions of GX 339−4, and over one hundred RXTE/radio observations of Cyg X-1. We have fit the former spectra with a very simple, but remarkably successful, phenomenological model consisting of a doubly broken power-law with an exponential roll-over plus a gaussian line. For GX 339−4, the break between the radio and soft X-ray power- laws occurs in the IR to optical range, in agreement with prior work [13, 1]. In contrast to prior works, we have fit the X-ray data in 'detector space' and provided a quantitative assessment of the extrapolated break location. The scaling of the radio-to-X-ray break location with integrated X- ray flux agrees reasonably well with predictions of jet models wherein a large fraction of the soft X-ray flux is due to synchrotron emission from the jet. At least some fraction of the observed soft X-rays may be attributable to emission from the jet, as opposed to disk or corona. On mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.7 8 Michael Nowak the other hand, we have evidence in the Cyg X-1 failed state transitions and soft state transition, that the correlation between radio flux and integrated X-ray flux can take on different amplitudes during different hard state episodes. There is also evidence in Cyg X-1 that the radio/X- ray correlation is more fundamental to the hard X-ray band. In jet models, this band, which essentially encompasses the third, highest energy, power-law component in our model fits (and also encompasses the exponential cutoff), is possibly attributable to the synchrotron self- Compton (SSC) emission from the base of the jet [12, 11]. It is therefore quite reasonable to expect a strong coupling between the radio and hard X-ray flux; however, these models are more complex than simple pure synchrotron models, and are only now beginning to be explored quantitatively [12, 11]. The results presented here suggest, at the very least, some obvious observational strategies. Given the break energy correlations, it would be extremely useful to have not only a radio amplitude for each X-ray observation, but also a radio slope. Furthermore, the predicted break for the brightest observation of GX 339−4, E, occurs in the blue end of the optical. Thus, ideally multi-wavelength observations would consist of radio, broad band X-ray, and IR through optical coverage. This is an admittedly difficult task, but BHC are demonstrating via spectral correlations that all these energy regimes are fundamentally related to activity near the central engine. Finally, it is important to obtain multi-wavelength observations of multiple episodes of each of the spectral states. For example, if there are indeed 'parallel tracks' in the radio/X-ray correlations, it would be interesting to determine whether the amplitude of the radio/X-ray correlation is related to the flux at which the outbursting source transits from the low/hard to high/soft state. If such observations can be made with more quantitative detail, we will have vital clues to determining the relative contributions of coronae and jets, and the coupling between these two components, for black hole binary systems. Acknowledgements This talk later evolved into the paper cited as Nowak et al. (2004). I would therefore like to thank my coauthors, J. Wilms, S. Heinz, G. Pooley, K. Pottschmidt, and S. Corbel. It is also a pleasure to acknowl- edge useful conversations with Sera Markoff and Jeroen Homan. This work has been supported by NASA grants SV3-73016 and GO4-5041X, and NSF grant INT-0233441. mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.8 Monitoring of GX 339−4 and Cyg X-1 9 References 1. Corbel, S. and R. P. Fender: 2002, 'Near-Infrared Synchrotron Emission from the Compact Jet of GX 339−4'. ApJ 573, L35 -- L39. 2. Corbel, S., M. A. Nowak, R. P. Fender, A. K. Tzioumis, and S. Markoff: 2003, 'Radio/X-ray correlation in the low/hard state of GX 339−4'. A&A 400, 1007 -- 1012. 3. Falcke, H. and P. L. Biermann: 1995, 'The jet-disk symbiosis. I. Radio to X-ray emission models for quasars.'. A&A 293, 665 -- 682. 4. Fender, R. P.: 2001, 'Powerful jets from black hole X-ray binaries in low/hard X-ray states'. MNRAS 322, 31 -- 42. 5. Gallo, E., R. P. Fender, and G. G. Pooley: 2003, 'A universal radio-X-ray correlation in low/hard state black hole binaries'. MNRAS 344, 60 -- 72. 6. Heinz, S.: 2004, 'Constraints on the role of synchrotron X-rays from jets of accreting black holes'. MNRAS. in press (astro-ph/0409029). 7. Heinz, S. and R. A. Sunyaev: 2003, 'The non-linear dependence of flux on black hole mass and accretion rate in core-dominated jets'. MNRAS 343, L59 -- L64. 8. Homan, J., M. Buxton, S. Markoff, C. Bailyn, E. Nespoli, and T. Belloni: 2004, 'Multi-wavelength Observations of the 2002 Outburst of GX 339−4: Two Patterns of X-ray Optical/Near Infrared Behavior'. ApJ. submitted. 9. Houck, J. C. and L. A. Denicola: 2000, 'ISIS: An Interactive Spectral Interpre- tation System for High Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopy'. In: ASP Conf. Ser. 216: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IX, Vol. 9. p. 591. 10. Markoff, S., H. Falcke, and R. Fender: 2001, 'A jet model for the broad- band spectrum of XTE J1118+480: optically thin synchrotron X-rays in the Low/Hard spectral state'. ApJ 372, L25 -- L28. 11. Markoff, S. and M. Nowak: 2004, 'Constraining X-ray Jet Models with Reflection'. ApJ 609, 972 -- 976. 12. Markoff, S., M. Nowak, S. Corbel, R. Fender, and H. Falcke: 2003, 'Exploring the role of jets in the radio/X-ray correlations of GX 339−4'. A&A 397, 645 -- 658. 13. Motch, C., S. A. Ilovaisky, C. Chevalier, and P. Angebault: 1985, 'An IR, optical and X-ray study of the two state behaviour of GX 339−4'. Space Sci. Rev. 40, 219. 14. Nowak, M. A., J. Wilms, and J. B. Dove: 2002, 'Coronal-temporal correlations in GX 339−4: Hysteresis, Possible Reflection Changes, and Implications for ADAFs'. MNRAS 332, 856 -- 878. 15. Nowak, M. A., J. Wilms, S. Heinz, G. Pooley, K. Pottschmidt, and S. Corbel: 2004, 'Is the 'IR Coincidence' Just That?'. ApJ. submitted. 16. Pottschmidt, K., J. Wilms, M. A. Nowak, G. G. Pooley, T. Gleissner, W. A. Heindl, D. M. Smith, R. Remillard, and R. Staubert: 2003, 'Long Term Vari- ability of Cyg X-1 (1998 to 2001) I. Systematic spectral-temporal correlations in the hard state'. A&A 407, 1039 -- 1058. 17. Wilms, J., M. A. Nowak, J. B. Dove, R. P. Fender, and T. di Matteo: 1999, 'Low Luminosity states of the black hole candidate GX 339−4. I. ASCA and simultaneous radio/RXTE observations'. ApJ 522, 460 -- 475. mnowak_talk.tex; 18/11/2018; 5:41; p.9
astro-ph/0208455	1	0208	2002-08-26T13:38:27	Be/X-ray Binaries	[ "astro-ph" ]	A review of basic properties of Be/X-ray binaries is presented. These systems (called also hard X-ray transients), which form the most numerous class of massive X-ray binaries in the Galaxy, are composed of Be stars and neutron stars (X-ray pulsars) on wide (orbital periods 17-263 d), usually eccentric (eccentricities 0.1-0.9) orbits. The systems contain two quasi-Keplerian (ratio of radial to orbital velocity components less than 0.01) discs: decretion disc around Be star and accretion disc around neutron star. Both discs are temporary: decretion disc disperses and refills on time scales of years (dynamical evolution of the disc, formerly known as the "activity of a Be star"), while accretion disc disperses and refills on time scales of weeks to months (which is related to the orbital motion on an eccentric orbit and, on some occasions, also to the major instabilities of the other disc). Accretion disc might be absent over a longer period of time (years), if the other disc is very weak or absent. The X-ray emission of Be/X-ray binaries has distinctly transient nature and is controlled by the centrifugal gate mechanism, which, in turn, is operated both by the periastron passages (Type I bursts) and by the dynamical evolution of the decretion disc (both types of bursts). The X-ray pulsars in these systems rotate at equilibrium periods (with the possible exception of the slowest pulsars). Be/X-ray binaries are excellent laboratories for investigation of both the evolutionary processes in the two discs and of the evolution of the neutron star rotation.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Be/X- RAY BINARIES JANUSZ ZI ´O LKOWSKI Copernicus Astronomical Center, ul. Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland ABSTRACT. A review of basic properties of Be/X-ray binaries is presented. These systems (called also hard X-ray transients), which form the most numerous class of massive X-ray binaries in the Galaxy, are composed of Be stars and neutron stars (X-ray pulsars) on wide (Porb ∼ 17 − 263 d), usually eccentric (e ∼ 0.1 − 0.9) orbits. The systems contain two quasi-Keplerian ( vr /vorb <∼ 10−2) discs: decretion disc around Be star and accretion disc around neutron star. Both discs are temporary: decretion disc disperses and refills on time scales ∼ years (dynamical evolution of the disc, formerly known as the "activity of a Be star"), while accretion disc disperses and refills on time scales ∼ weeks to months (which is related to the orbital motion on an eccentric orbit and, on some occasions, also to the major instabilities of the other disc). Accretion disc might be absent over a longer period of time (∼ years), if the other disc is very weak or absent. The X-ray emission of Be/X-ray binaries has distinctly transient nature and is controlled by the centrifugal gate mechanism, which, in turn, is operated both by the periastron passages (Type I bursts) and by the dynamical evolution of the decretion disc (both types of bursts). The X-ray pulsars in these systems rotate at equilibrium periods (with the possible exception of the slowest pulsars). Be/X-ray binaries are excellent laboratories for investigation of both the evolutionary processes in the two discs and of the evolution of the neutron star rotation. 1. Introduction At present, there are no doubts, that Be/X-ray systems (or hard X-ray transients) dom- inate the population of the massive X-ray binaries. These systems, whose primaries are Be stars and secondaries are neutron stars were initially believed to be just atyp- ical cases of massive X-ray binaries (typical cases were supergiant systems). The final Uhuru catalogue (Forman et al., 1977) listed just 1 such system (as opposed to 6 su- pergiant systems). Catalogue of Bradt et al. (1978), which was compilation of Uhuru, SAS-3, Ariel, Copernicus and HEAO-A sources, listed 5 Be/X-ray systems (and 8 su- pergiant systems). During my previous Vulcano talk on Be/X-ray binaries, 9 years ago (Zi´o lkowski, 1992), I listed 13 such binaries. Van Paradijs' (1995) catalogue contained 14 Be/X-ray systems (and 14 supergiant systems). In this review, I will present a list of 63 Be/X-ray binaries (while the number of the presently known supergiant systems is 20). As one can see, the number of the known Be/X-ray systems is growing fast and, due to the transient nature of their emission, it is likely to continue its fast growth in the future. At the same time, the number of the known supergiant systems (in our Galaxy) is already saturated and is not expected to increase substantially, One may notice that the situation in the field of the low mass X-ray binaries is similar. The fastest growing class of these systems is the group of soft X-ray transients (or X-ray Novae). These systems, composed typically of a black hole and a low mass optical companion, are being discovered at a high rate (again, due to the transient nature of their X-ray emission). In near future, they will, probably, dominate the population of the low mass X-ray binaries. It seems, that we have already detected almost all strong permanent X-ray sources in the Galaxy. In the future, we will detect mostly transient sources (both massive hard X-ray transients and low mass soft X-ray transients). 2. Basic Properties In this section, I will list basic characteristics of Be/X-ray binaries and confront them with the properties of the other massive X-ray systems. (1) The optical component is a Be star (in the other massive systems it is usually an OB supergiant). (2) The X-ray component is a strongly magnetized neutron star (an X-ray pulsar). In most of the supergiant systems, it is also a neutron star, but in five systems it is a black hole. No Be/black hole binary was found yet. (3) Orbits are elliptical with substantial eccentricities - usually e >∼ 0.3 (in the other systems orbits are usually circular). (4) The orbital periods are rather long - between 17 and 263 days (in the other systems they are almost always shorter than 10 days). (5) The optical components are not substantially evolved and they are substantially smaller than their Roche lobes. In the other massive systems, the optical components (supergiants) are substantially evolved (they are overluminous for their masses or undermassive for their luminosities) and they approximately fill their Roche lobes. (6) X-Ray emission (with a few exceptions) has distinctly transient nature with rather short active phases (a flaring behaviour). There are two types of flares, which are classified as Type I outbursts (smaller and regularly repeating) and Type II out- bursts (larger and irregular). In the supergiant systems the emission is rather per- manent, although it may be strongly variable. (7) X-Ray emission has a hard spectrum, with typical kT >∼ 15 keV (this property is shared with the other massive systems). Because of this property (and the transient nature of their X-ray emission), the Be/X-ray binaries are also called hard X-ray transients, as opposed to the so-called soft X-ray transients (or X-ray Novae), which have typical kT <∼ 1 keV and form a distinct group within the class of the low mass X-ray binaries. (8) In all but three systems that are confirmed or probable members of the class of Be/X-ray binaries, the neutron star is seen as an X-ray pulsar. The range of observed rotational periods covers more than four decades - from 0.03 sec to 1404 sec. In the supergiant systems the neutron star is also usually seen as an X-ray pulsar and the observed range of pulse periods is similarly wide (0.7 sec to 10000 sec). The list of the known Be/X-ray binaries and some of their parameters is given in Table 1. The list includes all X-ray systems containing a Be star and having at least one period (orbital or spin of the neutron star) determined. Tab. 1 − Be/X-Ray Binaries Name Pspin [s] Porb [d] e Sp. type Ref SAX J0635+0533 A SMC 0538−7 X−2 RX J0059.2−7138 AX J0105−722 4U RX J0502.9−6626 0115+63 V 0332+53 GRO J1750−27 XTE J0052−723 RX J0051.8−7231 AX J0049−732 2S GS 1553−54 0834−430 EXO 0531.1−6609 RX J0052.1−7319 XTE J1946+274 2S 1417−62 GRO J1948+32 RX J0117.6−7330 XTE J1543−568 XTE J0111.2−7317 RX J0812.4−3114 2030+37 EXO XTE J0053−724 SAX J0054.9−7226 Cep RX J0529.8−6556 RX J0049.1−7250 AX J0051−722 X−4 GRO J1008−57 1845−024 2S RX J0544.1−7100 AX J0057.4−7325 0535+26 0728−25 A 4U AX J1820.5−1434 RX J0052.9−7158 SAX J1324.4−6200 AX J0051.6−7311 0.034 0.069 2.37 2.763 3.343 3.61 4.06 4.37 4.45 4.782 8.9 9.132 9.26 12.3 13.7 15.3 15.8 17.6 18.76 22.07 27.1 30.95 31.89 41.7 46.63 58.97 66.3 69.5 74.68 90.65 93.5 94.8 96.08 101.42 103.5 103.2 152.26 169.3 170.84 172.4 < 0.09 0.12 30.6 105.8 25.4 172 42.12 41.7 76.6 < 0.03 81 46.03 139 65 120 247.5 242.18 110.3 34.5 0.41 0.66 0.88 0.47 16.7 > 0.5 24.31 0.34 34.25 29.82 0.31 0.446 B1 Ve < 0.25 B0.5 IIIe B2 V-IIIe B1.5 Ve B1 IIIe Be ? B0.2 Ve B0 IIIe O8.5 Ve Be ? Be ? Be Be ? Be ? B0-2 V-IIIe Be ? Be Be ? B0e B0.5 IIIe B0.7 Ve B0-2 V-IIIe B0.2 IVe B0e B1 Ve B0-1 V-IIIe B1e B2 V-IIIe Be Be O9e-B1e Be ? Be Be ? O9.7 IIIe O8.5 Ve Be ? Be Be Be 1 1,2 1,3,4 1 1 1,5 1,6 1,5 1,5 4,7 1 1 1,5 1,5 1 1 1,2 1,5,6 1,8,9 1 2,10 1,11 1,12,13 1,2 1 1 1,2 1 1 1,14 1,15 1,16 1 4,17 1,2,18 1,2 1,19 1,19 1 1,20 Tab. 1 − Be/X-Ray Binaries (cont.) Name Pspin [s] Porb [d] e Sp. type Ref GRO J2058+42 RX J0440.9+4431 AX J1749.2−2725 J1858+034 XTE GX AX J0058−720 4U AX J0051−733 304−1 1145−61 SAX J0103.2−7209 4U A 2206+54 1118−61 SAX J1452.8−5949 RX J0101.3−7211 AX J170006−4157 AX J0049.4−7323 4U RX J1037.5−5647 SAX J2239.3+6116 RX J0146.9+6121 1E 0236.6+6100 0352+30 γ Cas RX J0535.0−6700 198 202.5 220.38 221.0 272 280.4 292.4 323.2 345.2 392 406.4 437.4 455 714.5 755.5 837.7 862 1247.2 1404.2 110 132.5 187.5 1.416 ?? 9.57 ? > 0.5 > 0.5 250.3 262.6 26.49 203.59 241 ? 0.11 0.26 Be B0 V-IIIe Be Be ? B0.7 Ve Be ? B0.2 IIIe Be O9-B1 V-IIIe B1e O9.5 V-IIIe Be ? Be Be Be B0 Ve B0 Ve B0 V−B2 IIIe B1 Ve B0e B0.5 Ve Be 1 1 1,19 1 1,2 1,19 1,2 1 1 1,21 1,5 1 22 1,19 23 1,24 1 1,25 1 1,26 1,27 1 NOTES: e − eccentricity Sp. type − spectral type of the optical component Ref − references REFERENCES: (1) Liu et al. 2000; (2) Okazaki and Negueruela 2001; (3) Corbet aand Marshall 2000; (4) Mereghetti 2001; (5) Bildsten et al. 1997; (6) Negueruela 1998; (7) Corbet et al. 2001; (8) Levine and Corbet 2000; (9) Negueruela et al. 2000a; (10) Marshall et al. 2000; (11) Yokogawa et al. 2000a; (12) Corbet and Peele 2000; (13) Reig et al. 2000; (14) Israel et al. 1998 (15) Negueruela and Okazaki, 2000; (16) Finger et al. 1999; (17) Torii et al. 2000; (18) Negueruela et al. 2000b; (19) Haberl and Sasaki 2000; (20) Yokogawa et al. 2000b; (21) Corbet et al. 2000; (22) Sasaki et al. 2001; (23) Ueno et al. 2000; (24) Delgado-Marti et al. 2001; (25) In't Zand et al. 2001; (26) Zamanov et al. 2001; (27) Harmanec et al. 2000. 3. Temporal Behaviour of the X-Ray Emission Be/X-ray binaries exhibit three types of behaviour: (1) Type I outbursts They last days to weeks and are connected with the periastron passages of neutron stars orbiting Be stars on alongated orbits. They repeat after the time intervals equal to the orbital periods or their multiples. The recurrency is not very strict. On some occasions, single outbursts are missing (or are unusually weak). On some others, the outbursts disappear for extended periods (∼ years or decades). Almost all Be/X-ray binaries show Type I outbursts on some occasions, but the patterns are very different. Some systems (like A 0535+26) produce Type I outbursts during almost every periastron passage for a long interval of time (years or decades) and then the period of the missing outbursts follows. In some others (like 4U 0115+63 or V 0332+53) the outbursts are very rare: less than 1 % of all periastron passages results in Type I outbursts. In the second group, the typical pattern is composed of short series of the few Type I outbursts, separated by long periods (years or decades) of inactivity, during which only Type II outbursts occur. (2) Type II outbursts They last several weeks and are not correlated with any particular orbital phase. These bursts are typically much stronger (by an order of magnitude or more) than Type I bursts. They occur irregularly, but the typical recurrence time is of the order of several years (although the intervals as long as two decades were also noted). Type II bursts are usually preceded by an increased activity of the Be companion (enhanced emission lines). This last fact, together with the lack of the correlation with the orbital phase, indicates that Type II bursts are connected with the activity of a Be star (while Type I bursts are clearly connected with the periastron passages). (3) Persistent emission Five Be/X-ray binaries are seen as permanent X-ray sources (with the emission level variable only by a factor of few). All of them are probably wide orbit (Porb >∼ 200 days) systems, containing very slow pulsars (Pspin in the range 202 to 1404 sec). Some of these pulsars might rotate slower than at equilibrium periods (Zi´o lkowski, 2001). 4. Why the Emission is Transient? In order to understand the temporal behaviour of the X-ray emission from Be/X-ray binaries, we have to invoke the, so called, accretion gate mechanism which plays a fundamental role in switching on and off the X-ray emission. Then, we have to consider the mechanisms that operate the accretion gate by controlling the supply of the external matter to the magnetosphere of the neutron star. 4.1. The accretion gate mechanism The accretion gate mechanism operates due to changes in the mass flux of the mat- ter falling on the magnetosphere of the neutron star. The size of the magnetosphere is determined by the instantaneous balance between the magnetic pressure and the dy- namic pressure of the infalling matter. Therefore the magnetosphere changes its size. When the flux of the infalling matter decreases, the magnetosphere expands. When the flux increases - the magnetosphere gets squeezed. For example, the magnetosphere of a neutron star traveling along an elongated orbit around a Be star is much smaller at periastron than at apoastron. We have good reasons to believe that neutron stars in Be/X-ray binaries, similarly as many of the other X-ray pulsars, are rotating at so called equilibrium periods (Zi´o lkowski 1980, 1985; Joss and Rappaport 1984, Stella et al. 1986, Giovannelli and Zi´o lkowski 1990, and references therein). The equilibrium period is defined as a period at which the outer edge of magnetosphere rotates with the Keple- rian velocity. At this period the accelerating accretion torque and the braking propeller torque should balance each other and the period, in the first approximation, should be constant. For a given magnetosphere (i.e. for a given magnetic field strength) the equilibrium period depends mainly on the mass flux of the infalling matter (because it determines the size of the magnetosphere which is assumed to corotate with the neutron star). This dependence is given as Peq ∝ M −3/7 (Davidson and Ostriker 1973, van den Heuvel 1977, Lamb 1977). Returning to our neutron star on an elongated orbit, we see that its instantaneous equilibrium period varies along the orbit as it tracks the variable mass flux. At periastron Peq is much smaller than at apastron. As a result, we find that in a typical situation Pspin > Peq ("slow" pulsar) at periastron but Pspin < Peq ("fast" pulsar) at apoastron. It means that at periastron the accretion gate is open and the ro- tation of the pulsar (neutron star) is accelerated, while at apoastron the accretion gate is closed and the pulsar is braked. The real rotation period Pspin will adjust itself so that the action of the accretion torque along the inner part of the orbit and the braking torque along the outer part, integrated over the full orbital cycle, will cancel each other. Therefore the statement that X-ray pulsars in Be/X-ray binaries rotate at equilibrium periods should be read as "equilibrium periods averaged over orbital cycle (or, in fact, over many orbital cycles, because of the intrinsic variability of a Be star)". One should remember, however, that along the orbit (except for the two points) the real rotation period Pspin substantially differs from the instantaneous value of Peq and, therefore, the pulsar is always, either "fast" or "slow". The picture presented above applies directly only to those Be/X-ray binaries which exhibit (more or less regularly) Type I outbursts. However, the accretion gate mechanism plays a crucial role in all Be/X-ray binaries. 4.2. Two states of an X-ray pulsar The previous paragraph leads us to the picture of two possible states of an X-ray pulsar in a binary system: (1) Accretor This state typically occurs when Pspin > Peq. Since the velocity of the outer edge of magnetoshere is smaller then the Keplerian velocity, there is no centrifugal barrier. The matter can approach the neutron star and get accreted (accretion gate open). Due to accretion taking place, the neutron star is a strong X-ray emitter and also experiences a substantial spin-up of its rotation (the accreted matter carries a substantial angular momentum from the inner edge of the accretion disc). The characteristic properties of the accretor state are therefore: (1) "slowness" of the pulsar (Pspin > Peq), (2) strong X-ray emission, (3) rapid spin-up. (2) Propeller This is a typical state when Pspin < Peq.. In this case the velocity of the outer edge of magnetosphere is larger than the Keplerian velocity and there exist a centrifugal barrier against accretion. The matter that would like to get accreted is rather expelled by the magnetosphere acting as a propeller (llarionov and Sunyaev 1975, Davies et al. 1979). The accretion gate is closed. Only marginal amount of matter can get accreted and so the X-ray luminosity is low or undetectable. However the neutron star loses rotational energy because magnetospheric propeller has to work on the infalling matter to get it expelled and so it experiences a slow-down of its rotation. The characteristic properties of the propeller state are therefore: (1) "fastness" of the pulsar (Pspin < Peq.), (2) low or undetectable X-ray emission, (3) significant spin-down. 4.3. The Variability of the Supply of the External Matter to the Neutron Star From the last two paragraphs, it is clear that to operate (to open or to close) the accretion gate, one has to adjust accordingly (to increase or to decrease) the flux of the matter falling on the magnetosphere of the neutron star. In the Be/X-ray binaries, the matter in question comes from the decretion disc around the Be component (known earlier as "an envelope of a Be star"). There exist two mechanisms that might control the supply of that matter: (1) The eccentricity of the orbit of the neutron star The neutron star moving on an elongated orbit around the Be star is far from the decretion disc near the apoastron and quite close to it (or may even enter it) near the periastron. This may result in the larger mass flux of the infalling matter (and the open accretion gate) near the periastron and the smaller mass flux (and the closed gate) near apoastron. This mechanism is, most likely, responsible for Type I outbursts, which repeat, more or less regularly, at periastron passages. (2) The dynamical evolution of the decretion disc Both the observational evidence and the theoretical considerations (see section 6) indicate that the decretion disc is not a stable structure and evolves dynamically on a time scale of, typically, several years. This evolution leads to cyclical dispersals and refillings of the disc. Such variability produces on some occasions large infalls of matter on the neutron star (Type II bursts). On some other occasions (e.g. empty disc) this results in so low supply of the matter to the vicinity of the neutron star that even in a system producing, rather regularly, Type I bursts, the accretion gate remains closed during periastron passages (the case of the missing Type I bursts). 5. Accretion Discs around Neutron Stars Accretion discs around neutron stars in the Be/X-ray binaries have all properties of the accretion discs in other X-ray systems, except for their, possibly, transient nature. Accretion discs are, certainly, present during Type II outbursts. This might be directly inferred from the observed spin-ups of neutron stars during these bursts. The time scales of the spin-ups and their correlation with the X-ray luminosities indicate that the accreted angular momentum corresponds to the orbital angular momentum at the inner edge of the disc. The best studied case is the major February 1994 outburst of A 0535+26 (Finger et al., 1996; Bildstein et al., 1997), during which a spin-up on time scale ∼ 25 years was seen at the peak of the outbursts. The same outburst provided an independent evidence of the presence of an accretion disc, based on the interpretation of the QPO detected during that event. Both the frequency of the QPO (interpreted as the Keplerian frequency at the inner edge of the disc) and its correlation with the spin-up rate and with the X-ray luminosity (Finger et al., 1996; Bildstein et al., 1997) fully support the model based on an accretion disc. The accretion discs must be present also during most of Type I bursts. The system A 0535+26 demonstrated spin-ups on time scales ∼ 100 years during many Type I bursts (Zi´o lkowski, 1985; Giovannelli and Sabau Graziati, 1992). Similar spin-ups were observed during all (2S 1845-024; Finger et al., 1999) or, at least, some Type I bursts of many other Be/X-ray systems (e.g. 4U 0115+63, GS 0834-430, 2S 1417-62, EXO 2030+375, 4U 1145-61 − see Bildstein et al., 1997). Neutron stars in many Be/X-ray systems are known to experience spin-downs between the outbursts. This is in agreement with the predictions of the simple model, since they are expected to enter a propeller phase between the outbursts (see sections 4.1 and 4.2 above). For the system A 0535+26 the time scales of these spin-downs are of the order of 1000 years (Zi´o lkowski, 1985; Giovannelli and Sabau Graziati, 1992). In principle, the accretion disc may survive during the propeller phase. However, it seems that the accretion discs in the Be/X-ray binaries are not persistent. Clark et al. (1999) searched for the optical/infrared contribution from the accretion disc in A 0535+26 during the X-ray quiescent phase (propeller state). They found no significant contribution which implied that the accretion disc was either absent, or, if present, then only as a weak remnant. Let us summarize our considerations. The accretion discs are, probably, absent during the X-ray quiescent phases. They built up on time scales of days to weeks during the periods of the enhanced infall of the matter on the magnetosphere of a neutron star (before both Type I and Type II bursts). They disperse on time scales of weeks to months, when the enhanced supply of the matter ceases. The apparent exceptions to this picture are the five persistent systems (see section 3.3) that apparently maintain permanent accretion discs. 6. Decretion Discs around Be Stars The term "excretion disc" was introduced by B. Paczy´nski during 1979 IAU General Assembly (Paczy´nski, 1980). Simple, particle trajectories models of such discs were discussed by Paczy´nski and Rudak (1980). St¸epi´nski (1980) considered the discs around Be stars and proposed that variability of these stars is related to the changes in the sizes of the discs. The concept of the presence of two discs (one excreting and one accreting) in a Be/X-ray binary was first mentioned by Giovannelli and Zi´o lkowski (1990). Lee et al. (1991) discussed the possible existence of the outflowing viscous discs around Be stars. The next step was made when different authors (Okazaki, 1991; Papaloizu et al., 1992; Telting et al., 1994; Hanuschik et al., 1995) indicated that the one-armed instability developing in the outflowing discs may explain the, so called, V/R variability, observed in Be stars. In recent years, the outflowing viscous discs were used to describe, in details, the circumstellar matter around Be stars known earlier as "an envelope of a Be star" (Okazaki, 1997; Porter, 1999; Negueruela and Okazaki, 2000b; Okazaki, 2000; Negueruela at al., 2001; Okazaki and Negueruela, 2001). In meantime, the term "excretion" was replaced by an apparently more correct (politically) term "decretion". The modelling with the help of the viscous decretion discs appeared to be by far more succesful in describing the circumstellar matter, than earlier descriptions in terms of "equatorial winds", "expanding envelopes" or "ejected shells". In particular, the viscous disc models were able to explain the very low outflow velocities (the observed upper limits are, at most, few km/sec) and, also, to explain the V/R variability. The viscous decretion discs are very similar to the, well known, viscous accretion discs, except for the changed sign of the rate of the mass flow. Some aspects of these modellings (supply of the matter with the sufficient angular momentum to the inner edge of the disc, interaction of the stellar radiation with the matter of the disc) are not fully solved yet, but the general picture is quite convincing. The viscosity in the decretion discs is usually assumed (similarly as for accretion discs) in the form of α-viscosity. The discs are almost Keplerian (rotationally supported) which explains the very low values of the radial component of velocity. Nearly Keplerian discs (both inflowing and outflowing) were, since a long time, known to undergo a global one-armed oscillation instability (Kato, 1983). This instability (progressing density waves) provide a very successful explanation of V/R variability, observed both in isolated Be stars and in members of Be/X-ray systems. This phenomenon manifests itself in the form of quasi-cyclical changes of the ratio of the strengths of the V(iolet) peak to the R(ed) peak in the double profile emission lines. This variability (best seen for the Hα line) includes phases, when only one peak is visible. The time scales of the quasi-cycles range from months to years or decades. The theoretical line profiles calculated for the discs with the asymmetric matter distribution (due to progressing density waves) were found to be in a good agreement with the observed profiles (Hummel and Vrancken, 1995; Okazaki, 1996; Hummel and Hanuschik, 1997). Also the theoretical time scales calculated for the one-armed oscillation instability agreed with the observed time scales of V/R variability (Negueruela et al., 2001). 7. The Interaction Between the Decretion Disc and the Orbiting Neutron Star Until recently, it was thought that this interaction works only in one direction. It is obvious that the disc can strongly influence the behaviour of the neutron star. If it sends large enough flux of the matter towards the neutron star, then the accretion gate will open and the neutron star will undergo an X-ray outbursts. It seemed that the neutron star could not significantly influence the "envelope of the Be star" (as it was termed then). This point of view changed recently. Artymowicz and Lubow (1994) investigated the truncation mechanisms for the accretion discs and found that the discs must be much smaller in the systems with large eccentricities because of the tidal/resonant truncation. The same mechanism works also for the decretion discs. The orbiting neutron star exerts a negative tidal torque on the matter of the decretion disc (removes the angular momentum). This torque diminishes the action of the viscous torque, supporting the disc, and causes that outside of the certain radius the disc cannot be supported any more (tidal truncation). This effect was investigated, for several Be/X-ray binaries, by Negueruela and Okazaki (2000a,b), and Okazaki and Negueruela (2001). They found, that the disc is usually truncated at 4:1 or 3:1 resonances (i.e. at radii for which the Keplerian period in the disc is 4 or 3 times shorter than the orbital period). This mechanism is known as tidal/resonant truncation. Due to its action, in the systems with small eccentricities, the disc is always smaller than the Roche lobe around the Be star and the flow of the matter towards the neutron star is effectively blocked. However, in the systems with large eccentricities, the disc may extend beyond the Roche lobe, during the periastron passages. The accretion on the neutron star will be then possible during these passages. Therefore, the systems in the first group (like 4U 0115+63 or V 0332+53), typically, should not produce Type I bursts, while the systems in the second group (like A 0538−66, A 0535+26 or GRO J1008−57) should produce Type I bursts during most of their periastron passages. The observations strongly support this picture. The tidal/resonant truncation has some further consequences. Due to truncation, the matter accumulates in the outer rings of the disc. When the outer part of the disc becomes sufficiently optically thick, it may warp under the influence of the radiation of the Be star (Porter, 1998). The observations (the variability of the shape of the emission lines) tell us that the sufficiently warped disc start precessing on a time scale of weeks to months. The combined effects of the global one-armed oscillations and of the warping lead to asymmetric (elongated) configuration of the disc. Such configuration may permit an overcoming of the truncation. The, relatively, high density matter accumulated in the outer part of the disc will overflow the critical Roche lobe and fall on the neutron star leading to the Type II outburst. If the distorted disc happens to be elongated towards the periastron, it may supply the matter to the neutron star during the several periastron passages, leading to the temporary Type I outbursts in the systems, which normally do not show the bursts of this type. The Type II bursts are probably always associated with the major disturbances of the decretion disc, which frequently lead to the total disruption of the disc and the disc-less phase of the Be star. Part of the matter of the disc is accreted by the neutron star (during the Type II burst), most of it is, probably, reaccreted by the Be star. The decretion disc is then rebuilt on a time scale of, typically, a few years. The observations support the phenomenological picture presented above. In addition to the observational properties described earlier we may mention here the changes of the strength of the Hα line observed over more than 10 years period, before and after the major Type II burst in A 1118−61 (Coe et al., 1994). We may also add the correlation found recently for 1E 0236.6+6100/LS I+61o235 system. The size of the decretion disc in this system (as measured by the strength of the Hα line) was known to vary cyclically with the periodicity of ∼ 4.3 years. The system was also known to exhibit radio outbursts (in addition to X-ray maxima) during the periastron passages. Zamanov and Marti (2000) found a good correlation between the strength of the radio outbursts and the strength of the Hα line as they change over the ∼ 1584 days modulation period. 8. The Comparison of Be Stars in Be/X-ray Binaries with Isolated Be Stars The isolated Be stars and Be stars in Be/X-ray binaries are, in many respects, quite similar. Both types have decretion discs that evolve dynamically on time scale of years to decades. In both cases, the dynamical evolution includes one-armed oscillations, V/R variability and disc-less phases. However, there are also substantial differences concern- ing both Be stars themselves and their decretion discs. 8.1. Be stars The distribution of Be stars among different spectral subtypes was compared for both groups of Be stars by Negueruela (1998). The difference is striking. For isolated Be stars, the distribution starts at B0, rises sharply peaking at B2, declines towards B4 and then remains at approximately constant level, extending until at least A0. For Be stars in Be/X-ray binaries, the distribution starts at O8, peaks at B0 and ends at B2. The lack of the later spectral type (less massive) Be stars in binary systems may be explained with the help of the results of the evolutionary calculations by Van Bever and Vanbeveren (1997). They showed, that in scenarios involving the non-conservative mass transfer, binaries composed of a Be star and a neutron star are produced only with early type Be components. The less massive systems that would lead to binaries containing late type Be components are disrupted during the supernova explosion (the wide orbit systems are, generally, easy to disrupt). 8.2. Decretion discs The decretion discs around isolated Be stars are, in many respects, similar to those in Be/X-ray binaries, as was noted earlier. The main difference is the lack of the orbiting neutron star and, therefore, the lack of the tidal/resonant truncation mechanism. As a result, the decretion discs in binaries are smaller and denser than those around the isolated Be stars (Reig et al., 1997; Negueruela and Okazaki, 2000b, Zamanov et al., 2000). As might be expected, the discs in close binaries are smaller and the discs in wide orbit binaries - larger. This is clearly seen from the strong positive correlation between the maximal observed strength of the Hα line and the orbital period of the binary, noted by Reig et al. (1997). In the few widest systems, the disc is probably only weakly perturbed by the neutron star. As a result, there are no X-ray outbursts. The low level accretion and the low level X-ray emission are maintained continuously (and the only variability is an occasional enhancement). 9. The Pulse Period - Orbital Period Correlation for Be/X-ray Binaries (the Corbet Diagram) Corbet (1984) was the first to notice that there exists a strong correlation between the spin period of a neutron star in a Be/X-ray binary and the orbital period of the system. The updated version of his diagram (containing 25 systems) is shown in Fig. 1. The spread is larger than on the diagram that I have shown here nine years ago (there were only 9 points on the diagram then), but the reality of the correlation leaves no doubt. This correlation is fully to be expected, if we remember that the neutron star tries to adjust its spin period to the equilibrium value. This value increases as the flux of the matter supplied to the vicinity of the neutron star decreases (Peq ∝ M −3/7). In wide systems, with long orbital periods, the accretion is fed from the outer, low density, parts of the large (very extended) decretion disc and so the expected mass fluxes are rather low. This leads to the long spin periods. Fig. 1. The correlation between the spin period (in seconds) and the orbital period (in days) for Be/X-ray binaries (Corbet diagram). The diagram contains 25 systems for which both periods are presently known (the systems AX J0051-733 and 4U 2206+54 with the doubtful values of the orbital period are omitted). 10. The Summary Let us summarize the main points of our considerations. • Be/X-ray binaries (called also hard X-ray transients) form the most numerous class of massive X-ray binaries in the Galaxy (63 systems presently known as opposed to 20 supergiant systems). • They are composed of Be stars and neutron stars (X-ray pulsars) on wide (Porb ∼ 17 − 263 d), usually eccentric (e ∼ 0.1 − 0.9) orbits. • X-Ray emission (with a few exceptions) has distinctly transient nature with rather short active phases (a flaring behaviour). There are two types of flares, which are classi- fied as Type I outbursts (smaller and, more or less regularly, repeating during periastron passages over some periods of time) and Type II outbursts (larger and irregular). • The optical components are not significantly evolved and they are substantially smaller than their Roche lobes. • The X-ray pulsars in Be/X-ray binaries rotate at equilibrium periods (with the possible exception of the slowest pulsars). The range of the observed spin periods is very wide - from 0.03 sec to 1404 sec. • The systems contain two quasi-Keplerian ( vr /vorb <∼ 10−2) discs: a decretion disc around Be star and an accretion disc around the neutron star. • Both discs are temporary: decretion disc disperses and refills on time scales ∼ years (dynamical evolution of the disc, formerly known as the "activity of a Be star"), while accretion disc disperses and refills on time scales ∼ weeks to months (which is related to the orbital motion on an eccentric orbit and, on some occasions, also to the major instabilities of the other disc). • Accretion disc might be absent over a longer period of time (∼ years), if the other disc is very weak or absent (this phenomenon manifests itself as the missing Type I bursts in the systems which normally display these bursts). • The X-ray emission of Be/X-ray binaries is controlled by the centrifugal gate mechanism, which, in turn, is operated both by the periastron passages (Type I bursts) and by the dynamical evolution of the decretion disc (both types of bursts). • Decretion discs are unstable to one-armed oscillation instability (which is probably responsible for the V/R variability seen in the Be stars). • Decretion discs in Be/X-ray binaries are truncated by the orbiting neutron stars (the tidal/resonant truncation). • Due to truncation, in the systems with small eccentricities, the flow of the matter towards the neutron star is effectively blocked during the whole orbital cycle (no Type I bursts). However, in the systems with large eccentricities, the flow is possible during the periastron passages (regular Type I bursts). • Due to truncation, the matter accumulates in the outer rings of the decretion disc. This leads to the warping of the disc and then to its major instability (frequently to the total disruption). This mechanism is probably responsible for the Type II bursts (and for occasional Type I bursts in the systems which normally do not show them). • Be/X-ray binaries are excellent laboratories for investigation of both the evolu- tionary processes in the two discs and of the evolution of the neutron star rotation. Acknowledgements This work was partially supported by the State Committee for Scientific Research grant No 2 P03C 006 19p01. References Artymowicz, P. and Lubow, S.H.: 1994, Astrophys. J. 421, 651. Bildsten, L., Chakrabarty, D., Chiu, J. Finger, M.H., Koh, D.T., Nelson, R.W., Prince, T.A., Rubin, B.C., Scott, D.M., Stollberg, M., Vaughan, B.A., Wilson, C.A. and Wilson, R.B.: 1997, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 113, 367. Clark, J.S., Lyuty, V.M., Zaitseva, G.V., Larionov, V.M., Larionova, L.V., Finger, M., Tarasova, A.E., Roche, P. and Coe, M.J.: 1999, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 302, 167. Coe, M.J., Roche, P., Everall, C., Fishman, G.J., Hagedon, K.S., Finger, M., Wilson, R.B., Buckley, D.A.H., Shrader, C., Fabregat, J., Polcaro, V.F., Giovannelli, F. and Villada, M.: 1994, Astron. Astrophys. 289, 784. Corbet, R.H.D.: 1984, Astron. Astrophys. 141, 91. Corbet, R.H.D. and Marshall, F.E.: 2000, IAUC 7402. Corbet, R.H.D., Marshall, F.E. and Markwardt, C.B.: 2001, IAUC 7562. Corbet, R.H.D. and Peele, A.G.: 2000, Astrophys. J. Lett. 530, L33. Corbet, R., Remillard, R. and Peele, A.: 2000, IAUC 7446. Davidson, K. and Ostriker, J.P.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 179, 585. Davies, R.E., Fabian, A.C. and Pringle, J.E.: 1979, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 186, 779. Delgado-Marti, H., Levine, A.M., Pfahl, E. and Rappaport, S.A.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 546, 455. Finger, M.H., Wilson, R.B. and Harmon, B.A.: 1996, Astrophys. J. 459, 288. Finger, M.H., Bildsten, L., Chakrabarty, D., Prince, T.A., Scott, D.M., Wilson, C.A., Wilson, R.B. and Nan Zhang, S.: 1999, Astrophys. J. 517, 449. Giovannelli, F. and Sabau Graziati, L.:1992, Space Sci. Rev. 59, 1. Giovannelli, F. and Zi´o lkowski, J.: 1990, Acta Astron. 40, 95. Haberl, F. and Sasaki, M.: 2000, astro-ph 0005226. Hanuschik, R.W., Hummel, W., Dietle, O. and Sutorios, E.: 1995, Astron. Astrophys. 300, 163. Harmanec, P., Habuda, P., Stefl, S., Hadrava, P., Korcakova, D., Koubsky, P., Krticka, J., Kubat, J., Skoda, P., Slechta, M. and Wolf, M.: 2000, astro-ph 0011516. Hummel, W. and Vrancken, M.: 1995, Astron. Astrophys. 302, 751. Hummel, W. and Hanuschik, R.W.: 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 320, 852. Illarionov, A.F. and Sunyaev, R.A.: 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 39, 195. In't Zand, J.J.M., Swank, J., Corbet, R.H.D. and Markwardt, C.B.: 2001, astro-ph 0110695. Israel, G.L., Stella, L., Campana, S., Covino, S., Ricci, D. and Oosterbroek, T.: 1998, IAUC 6999. Joss, P. and Rappaport, S.A.: 1984, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 22, 537. Kato, S.: 1983, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 35, 249. Lamb, F.K.: 1977, in Eight Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Annals New York Academy Sci. 302, 482. Lee, U., Saio, H. and Osaki, Y.: 1991, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 250, 432. Levine, A. and Corbet, R.: 2000, IAUC 7523. Liu, Q.Z., van Paradijs, J. and van den Heuvel, E.P.J.: 2000, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 147, 25. Marshall, F.E., Takeshima, T. and in't Zand, J.: 2000, IAUC 7363. Mereghetti, S.: 2001, in Frontier Objects in Astrophysics and Particle Physics, F. Gio- vannelli and G. Mannocchi, eds., Italian Physical Society, Editrice Compositori, Bologna, Italy, 73, 239. Negueruela, I.: 1998, astro-ph 9807158. Negueruela, I., Marco, A., Speziali, R. and Israel, G.L.: 2000a, IAUC 7541. Negueruela, I. and Okazaki, A.T.: 2000a, astro-ph 0011406. Negueruela, I. and Okazaki, A.T.: 2000b, astro-ph 0011407. Negueruela, I., Reig, P., Finger, M.H. and Roche, P.: 2000b, astro-ph 0002272. Negueruela, I., Okazaki, A.T., Fabregat, J., Coe, M.J., Munari, U. and Tomov, T.: 2001, astro-ph 0101208. Okazaki, A.T.; 1991, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 43, 75. Okazaki, A.T.; 1996, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 48, 305. Okazaki, A.T.; 2000, astro-ph 0010517. Okazaki, A.T.; 1997, in The Interactions of Stars with Their Environment, L.V. Toth, M. Kun and L. Szabados (eds.), Konkoly Observatory, Budapest, p. 407. Okazaki, A.T. and Negueruela, I.: 2001, astro-ph 0108037. Paczy´nski, B.: 1980, Highlights of Astronomy 5, 27. Paczy´nski, B. and Rudak, B.: 1980, Acta Astron. 30, 237. Papaloizu, J.C., Savonije, G.J. and Henrichs, H.F.: 1992, Astron. Astrophys. Lett. 265, L45. Porter, J.M.: 1998, Astron. Astrophys. 336, 966. Porter, J.M.: 1999, Astron. Astrophys. 348, 512. Reig, P., Fabregat, J. and Coe, M.J.: 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 322, 193. Reig, P., Negueruela, I., Buckley, D.A.H., Coe, M.J., Fabregat, J. and Haigh, N.J.: 2000, astro-ph 0011305. Sasaki, M., Haberl, F., Keller, S. and Pietsch, W.: 2001, astro-ph 0102361. Stella, L., White, N.E. and Rosner, R.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 308, 669. St¸epi´nski, T.: 1980 Acta Astron. 30, 413. Telting, J.H., Heemskerk, M.H.M., Henrichs, H.F. and Savonije, G.J.: 1994, Astron. Astrophys. 288, 588. Torii, K., Kohmura, T., Yokogawa, J. and Koyama, K.: 2000, IAUC 7441. Ueno, M., Yokogawa, J., Imanishi, K. and Koyama, K.: 2000, IAUC 7442. Van Bever, J. and Vanbeveren, D.: 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 322, 116. Van den Heuvel, E.P.J.: 1977, in Eight Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Annals New York Academy Sci. 302, 482. Van Paradijs, J.: 1995, in X-Ray Binaries, W.H.G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs and E.P.J. van den Heuvel, (eds.), Cambridge University Press, p. 536. Yokogawa, J., Paul, B., Ozaki, M., Nagase, F., Chakrabarty, D. And Takeshima, T.: 2000a, Astrophys. J. 539, 191. Yokogawa, J., Torii, K., Imanishi, K. and Koyama, K.: 2000b, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 52, L37. Zamanov, R. and Marti, J.: 2000, astro-ph 0005201. Zamanov, R., Marti, J. and Marziani, P.: 2001, astro-ph 0110114. Zamanov, R.K., Reig, P., Marti, J., Coe, M.J., Fabregat, J., Tomov, N.A. and Valchev, T.: 2000, astro-ph 0012371. Zi´o lkowski, J.: 1980, in Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretations, M.J. Plavec, D.M. Popper and R.K. Ulrich (eds.), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Hol- land, p. 335. Zi´o lkowski, J.: 1985, Acta Astron. 35, 185. Zi´o lkowski, J.: 1992, Be/X-Ray Binaries, review presented at Vulcano Workshop 1992 (unpublished). Zi´o lkowski, J.: 2001, in Exploring the Gamma-Ray Universe, A. Gimenez, V. Reglero and C. Winkler (eds.), (Proceedings of the Fourth Integral Workshop), ESA SP-459, p. 169.
astro-ph/0504416	2	0504	2007-09-25T06:16:05	Remarks on the formulation of the cosmological constant/dark energy problems	[ "astro-ph", "gr-qc", "hep-th" ]	Associated with the cosmic acceleration are the old and new cosmological constant problems, recently put into the more general context of the dark energy problem. In broad terms, the old problem is related to an unexpected order of magnitude of this component while the new problem is related to this magnitude being of the same order of the matter energy density during the present epoch of cosmic evolution. Current plans to measure the equation of state certainly constitute an important approach; however, as we discuss, this approach is faced with serious feasibility challenges and is limited in the type of conclusive answers it could provide. Therefore, is it really too early to seek actively for new tests and approaches to these problems? In view of the difficulty of this endeavor, we argue here that a good place to start is by questioning some of the assumptions underlying the formulation of these problems and finding new ways to put this questioning to the test. First, we calculate how much fine tuning the cosmic coincidence problem represents. Next, we discuss the potential of some cosmological probes such as gravitational lensing to identify novel tests to probe dark energy questions and assumptions. Then, motivated by some theorems in General Relativity, we discuss if the full identification of the cosmological constant with vacuum energy is unquestionable. Also, we point out the relevance of experiments at the interface of astrophysics and quantum field theory, such as the Casimir effect in gravitational and cosmological contexts. We conclude that challenging some of the assumptions underlying the cosmological constant problems and putting them to the test may prove useful and necessary to make progress on these questions. (Abridged)	astro-ph	astro-ph	Remarks on the formulation of the cosmological constant/dark energy problems 7 0 0 2 p e S 5 2 2 v 6 1 4 4 0 5 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Mustapha Ishak1 [], 1 Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Dal las, Richardson, TX 75083, USA (Dated: August 12, 2013) Associated with the cosmic acceleration are the old and new cosmological constant problems, recently put into the more general context of the dark energy problem. In broad terms, the old problem is related to an unexpected order of magnitude of this component while the new problem is related to this magnitude being of the same order of the matter energy density during the present epoch of cosmic evolution. Current plans to measure the equation of state or density parameters certainly constitute an important approach; however, as we discuss, this approach is faced with seri- ous feasibility challenges and is limited in the type of conclusive answers it could provide. Therefore, is it really too early to seek actively for new tests and approaches to these problems? In view of the difficulty of this endeavor, we argue in this work that a good place to start is by questioning some of the assumptions underlying the formulation of these problems and finding new ways to put this questioning to the test. First, we calculate how much fine tuning the cosmic coincidence problem represents. Next, we discuss the potential of some cosmological probes such as weak gravitational lensing to identify novel tests to probe dark energy questions and assumptions and provide an exam- ple of consistency tests. Then, motivated by some theorems in General Relativity, we discuss if the full identification of the cosmological constant with vacuum energy is unquestionable. We discuss some implications of the simplest solution for the principles of General Relativity. Also, we point out the relevance of experiments at the interface of astrophysics and quantum field theory, such as the Casimir effect in gravitational and cosmological contexts. We conclude that challenging some of the assumptions underlying the cosmological constant problems and putting them to the test may prove useful and necessary to make progress on these questions. PACS numbers: 98.80.Jk,04.20.Cv I. INTRODUCTION Several different types of astrophysical observations, e.g. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], have established the evidence that the expansion of the universe entered a phase of acceleration. Associated with this acceleration is a cosmological constant, or another dark energy component, that contributes significantly to the total energy density of the universe. 2 Cosmic acceleration and dark energy constitute one of the most important and challenging of current problems in cosmology and other areas of physics. There are many comprehensive reviews of the cosmological constant or dark energy, including the observational evidence for it and the problems associated with it, and we refer the reader to some of them [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Three questions related to the cosmic acceleration are encountered in the published literature, two of which are found in different formulations or expressions. These are: i) What is causing the cosmic acceleration? Is it a cosmological constant or a dynamical dark energy component [16]? Is this associated with the stress-energy momentum sector or with the curvature sector of the Einstein field equations (EFE)? Is this an indication of new physics at cosmological scales? ii) The old cosmological constant problem: If the acceleration is caused by vacuum energy, then why is the value measured from astrophysics so small compared to values obtained from quantum field theory calculations (this is the puzzling smallness formulation, see for example [12])? Another formulation is: Why do all the contributions to the effective cosmological constant term cancel each other up to a very large number of decimal places (this is the fantastic cancelation formulation, see for example [8])? We contrast the two formulations in the next section. iii) The new cosmological constant problem: Why is the acceleration happening during the present epoch of the cosmic evolution? (Any earlier would have prevented structures from forming in the universe.) This is also formulated as the cosmic coincidence: i.e. why is the dark energy density of the same order of magnitude as the matter density during the present time? In this paper, we argue that questioning the formulation of these problems and challanging the underlying as- sumptions may proove useful and necessary in order to make progress on the questions. We start by discussing the cosmic coincidence problem and then make some clarifications using some fraction calculations. Then, we calculate some prospective constraints on the cosmological parameters of dark energy/cosmological constant and discuss the inferred possible answers. Constraining the equation of state parameters is certainly an important approach to per- sue, however, as we show, the level of precision required is very challanging, and yet the approach is limited in the kind of answers it could provide. This points out the need for new approaches to dark energy/cosmological constant problems. In particular, questioning the assumptions underlying these questions may be found useful in order to look for new types of tests or approaches to these problems. We provide an example where cosmological probes of the cosmic expansion and the growth rate of large-scale struture-formation can be used in order to distinguish between cosmic acceleration due to dark energy and cosmic acceleration due to some modification to General Relativity at cosmological scales. Next, we question the full identification of the cosmological constant with vacuum energy in light of some theorems on the most general curvature tensor in the Einstein Field equations. Then, we discuss how a simple intrinsic constant curvature of spacetime would fit within important interpretations of General Relativity’s principles. Finally, we point out the relevance of experiments at the interface of particle physics and astrophysics, such as the Casimir effect in astrophysical and cosmological contexts. A discussion and conclusion are provided in the last section. 3 II. PRELIMINARIES A. Notation We recall here only some preliminary equations and definitions necessary for the clarity of the paper. We refer the reader to review papers, see e.g. [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14] and text books, see e.g. [17, 18, 19, 20]. The Einstein Field Equations (EFE) with a cosmological constant Λ read where κ ≡ 8πG and Gαβ + Λgαβ = κTαβ Gαβ ≡ Rαβ − 1 2 gαβ R (1) (2) is the Einstein tensor, Rαβ , R and gαβ are the Ricci tensor, the Ricci curvature scalar and the metric tensor respectively. For a perfect fluid, the energy-momentum tensor is given by Tαβ = (ρ + p)uαuβ + pgαβ (3) where uα is the four velocity vector and ρ and p are the energy-density and isotropic pressure relative to uα . With global isotropy, when Tαβ = 0, the EFE (1) admit de Sitter space (for Λ > 0) as a solution, for which a line element is given by (A5) in the appendix. Motivated by current observations, e.g. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], and for the sake of simplicity, let us consider the concordance spatially flat universe with a positive cosmological constant Λ. The EFE (1) with a dust source can be solved explicitly to give Λ (cid:17)1/3 h sinh( a(t) = (cid:16) 3C √3Λ 2 t)i2/3 (4) where C ≡ 8πρa3/3 is a constant; and the spacetime line element is given by ds2 = −dt2 + a2 (t)(dr2 + r2 dΩ2 ). 4 (5) where dΩ2 = (dθ2 + sin2 θdφ2 ). At early stages, the universe is matter dominated and a(t) = ( 9C 4 t2 )1/3 . At late stages, the universe is dominated by the cosmological constant and enters a de Sitter phase with a(t) = ( 3C 4Λ )1/3 exp pΛ/3t. We plot the curvature evolution and profile of these spacetimes in the appendix. Now, to introduce the vacuum energy density, let us consider a scalar field with Lagrangian density and energy momentum tensor Lφ = − 1 2 gαβ ∂αφ∂β φ − V (φ) T φ αβ = ∂αφ∂β φ − 1 2 (g δγ ∂δ φ∂γ φ)gαβ − V (φ)gαβ (6) (7) The lowest energy density of the field configuration is when the kinetic (or gradient) term vanishes and the potential is at the minimum V (φmin ). The energy momentum (7) reduces to This form of T vac αβ is also the only Lorentz-invariant form for the vacuum energy. T vac αβ = −V (φmin )gαβ = −ρvacgαβ (8) B. The old cosmological constant problem The common identification of the cosmological constant with the vacuum energy density is based on the mathemat- ical equivalence of the vacuum energy momentum tensor (8) and the cosmological constant term on the LHS of the EFE (1). Also, writing a lagrangian density that includes gravitational terms and terms from quantum field theory leads to the temptation to combine some of these terms; however, one should bear in mind that we don’t have such a unified theory yet. Now, if one considers that a geometrical cosmological constant term is an integral part of the EFE then the old cosmological constant problem can be expressed as (see for example [8, 13]): Why do all the contributions from vacuum energy density fantastically cancel with the geometrical Λ term? This formulation of the problem seems to be less often recalled in some of the recent literature. To see this quantitatively, one can combine equations (1) and (8) to write Λef f ective 8πG = Λ 8πG + ρvac (9) where from effective quantum field theory 5 1 2 X ¯hω . Now, if one considers only quantum field fluctuations cut off at particle energies of 100 GeV (this means, we consider ρvac = (10) only the well known physics of the standard model), one can write (with ¯h = c = 1) ρvac ∼ (100GeV )4 . However, from astrophysical observations (Λef f ective /8πG) is found to be comparable to the critical density, i.e. ∼ 10−48 GeV 4 which means that the two terms in the RHS of (9) must cancel to 56 decimal places. On the other hand, from the identification of the cosmological constant with the vacuum energy, the old Λ problem becomes: Why is the vacuum energy measured from astrophysics (∼ 10−48 GeV 4 ) so small compared to the value of the vacuum energy estimated from quantum field theory (∼ (100GeV )4 )? Of course, the situation is made even worse by taking the GUT or Planck scales. This full identification may bring some limitations of its own to the old cosmological constant problem and is questioned later in this work. III. HOW MUCH FINE-TUNING DOES THE COSMIC COINCIDENCE REPRESENT? (THE NEW ”PROBLEM”) The cosmic coincidence problem is usually stated as why is the cosmic acceleration recent in the cosmic history of the universe (why “now”?) It is also discussed in terms of a fine tuning problem: i.e. why is the matter energy density of the same order of magnitude as the dark energy density at the present epoch? Related to this question is the fact that if the dark energy density was much larger then what is measured it would have dominated over the matter energy density much earlier and prevented structures from forming in the universe. It is important to discuss the cosmic coincidence because it is an argument that is used to motivate the search for dynamical components in order to be able to explain the coincidence. We will try to quantify some of these statements here. The matter energy density is related to the redshift by ρm (z ) = (1 + z )3ρtoday m (z = 0), and in a ΛCDM universe t(a) = Z a 0 where a = 1 1+z is normalized to 1 today. da′ a′H (a′ ) = Z a 0 da′ a′H0√ΩΛ + Ωma′−3 (11) (12) Now, from the concordance model Ωm ≈ 0.3 and ΩΛ ≈ 0.7 today and it follows that ρΛ = ΩΛ Ωm ρtoday m ≈ 2.33ρtoday m . 6 (13) At the transition from deceleration to acceleration the dark energy density is half the matter energy density and Ωm (cid:19)1/3 1 + ztrans = (cid:18) 2ΩΛ (see for a first measurement of this [1]: 1 + ztrans = 1.46 ± 0.13). It is a clarifying exercise to evaluate the age of the universe t at this transition. Using (12) gives a transition age ≈ 1.67 (14) of ≈ 7.14 billion years (we use H0 = 72km/s/M pc [3]), showing that the transition is not that recent in the time history of the universe. Moreover, ρm and ρΛ have been within the same order of magnitude starting roughly from 1 + z ≈ 2.85 (with ρm ≈ 9.94ρΛ) and that corresponds to an age of the universe of ≈ 3.38 billion years. i.e. ρm and ρΛ have been within the same order of magnitude for at least the last 10.32 billions years of the time history of the universe. In order to evaluate how much fine-tuning the cosmic coincidence represents, one could evaluate some informative fractions using the transition time or the period during which dark energy has been of the same order of magnitude as the matter energy density, compared to the whole history of the universe. These fractions provide the percent chances for an observer randomly put in the time history of the universe to have the matter energy density and the dark energy density being of the same order of magnitude. We will compare energy densities using a logarithmic scale of time, so the results will be similar to those using a logarithmic redshift scale. On a logarithmic scale, things can appear very significant on plots; however, the fractions are actually of a few percent: and ln ttoday − ln ttransition ln ttoday − ln ti ≈ 2%, ln ttoday − ln tsame−order ln ttoday − ln ti ≈ 3% (15) (16) ln ttoday − ln tsame−order ln ttoday − ln tP lanck ≈ 1% We used here ti = 1 sec as we considered observational constraints from the Big Bang nucleosynthesis and CMB (17) results to trace back in time the universe up to 1 second at the e+ e− annihilation. We also use the Planck time tP lanck = 10−44 sec and find that the fraction is ≈ 1%. insignificant: (Of course on a linear scale of time the coincidence is 7 and ttoday − ttransition ttoday − ti ≈ 48% ttoday − tsame−order ttoday − ti ≈ 75%.) (18) (19) In summary, even on a logarithmic scale the fractions remain of the order of a few percent. This is significant but not totally unusual in physics and astrophysics. Consequently, while it remains perhaps a motivated problem to seek models that could naturally explain some of these small fractions, this fine tuning should not constitute a barrier to reject models that address successfully the other cosmological constant problems. IV. OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE EQUATION OF STATE PARAMETERS AND THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT/DARK ENERGY QUESTIONS An important approach to the cosmological constant questions is to parameterize the dark energy using its equation of state, and then to use different cosmological data sets in order to determine these parameters. One can thus infer answers to the cosmological constant/dark energy questions from the values found for these parameters. As we will delineate further, some results will be more conclusive than others. It is essential to combine multiple complementary cosmological probes and techniques in order to break degeneracies between the cosmological parameters including the dark energy parameter space. A powerful combination for constraining the dark energy parameters is the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) plus distance measurements from the type Ia Supernovae (SNIe) and Weak Gravitational Lensing (WL) also called cosmic shear, e.g. see [50, 51, 52]. These probes provide orthogonal constraints that, when combined, reduce significantly the uncertainties on the individual parameters. Also, constraints from clusters of galaxies and baryons oscillations were shown to be good probes of the dark energy equation of state, see e.g. [21, 22]. Interestingly, WL allows one to do tomography by separating the source-galaxies into redshift bins in order to obtain further improvements on the parameter constraints, see e.g. [23, 24, 25]. In this analysis, we consider future constraints from the CMB+SNIe+WL combination plus WL tomography with various numbers of redshift bins. 8 TABLE I: Cosmological model. We use fiducial values for the parameters from recent results from the WMAP (3-years data results) + Large scale Structure + Supernova data as listed in table II with the respective references (we use for the equation of state the cosmological constant parameter values). We assume a spatially flat universe with Ωm + ΩΛ = 1. This fixes Ωm and H0 as functions of the basic parameters. We do not include massive neutrinos, or primordial isocurvature perturbations. Symbol Description Fiducial value Probe-1 Probe-2 Probe-3 Ωm h2 ΩΛ physical matter density 0.1259 fraction of the critical density in a dark energy component 0.745 w0 ,w1 (or wa ) equation of state parameters σ lin 8 amplitude of linear fluctuations -1, 0 0.712 ns (k0 = 0.05h/Mpc) spectral index of the primordial scalar power spectrum at k0 0.946 αs zp ζs ζr Ωb h2 τ T /S running of the primordial scalar power spectrum -0.06 the characteristic redshift of source galaxies for lensing 0.76, 1.12 absolute calibration parameter for WL power spectrum [42, 43] 0.0 relative calibration parameter for WL power spectrum [42, 43] 0.0 physical baryon density optical depth to reionization scalar-tensor fluctuation ratio 0.0448 0.08 0.2 WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL CMB SNIe CMB SNIe CMB SNIe CMB CMB CMB CMB CMB CMB A. methodology In this analysis, we consider a cosmological model with 13 parameters that take the fiducial values in table I based on recent 3-years results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) [2, 40, 41] combined with large scale structure and supernova data as given in table II below along with the respective references (except for the dark energy equation of state, where we use the cosmological constant values). We consider in this analysis, the two standard parameterizations for the dark energy equation of state w = P /ρ given by • w(z ) = w0 + w1 z if z < 1 and w(z ) = w0 + w1 otherwise, e.g. [1, 35], and • w(a) = w0 + wa (1 − a), e.g. [36, 37]. The dark energy density as a function of redshift is thus given by Q(z ) ≡ ρde (z )/ρde (0) = exp 3 Z z 0 1 + w(z ′ ))dz ′ 1 + z ′ . (20) TABLE II: Data sets used in [41] to derive the constraints on equation of state parameter w using CMB, large scale structure and supernova data (table 9 in [41]). See also the NASA’s data center for Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) research, 9 LAMBDA at http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/ . data set/experiment references WMAP 3-years results (Spergel, et al., 2006) [41] 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (Cole, et al., 2005) [26] BOOMERanG + ACBAR (Montroy, et al., 2005, Kuo, et.al., 2004) [28, 29] CBI + VSA (Readhead, et al., 2004, Dickinson, et.al., 2004) [30, 31] Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Tegmark, et al., 2004; Eisenstein, et.al., 2005) [27, 32] Supernova ”Gold Sample” (Riess, et.al., 2004) [34] Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) (Astier, et al., 2006) [33] Despite its simplicity, statistical inference theory using Fisher matrices was proven to be a very efficient tool to calculate constraints that will be obtained from future planned or proposed experiments. As an example of its efficiency, one could look at the good predictions on the parameter uncertainties forecasted, for instance, by [23, 38] for WMAP and compare them to the real WMAP results, obtained years later [2]. We describe here only the basic ideas of the methods that we use in the current paper but provide references [45] where the full detail can be found. We use the standard approach to calculate the statistical error on a given parameter pα by using the combination: σ2 (pα ) ≈ [(FCM B + FW L + FSN e + Π)−1 ]αα , (21) where FCM B , FW L and FSN e are the Fisher matrices from CMB, weak lensing, and supernovae respectively, and Π is the prior matrix. As discussed in some detail in [23, 25], we calculate FW L using Fαβ = ∂Pκ ∂ pα ∂Pκ ∂ pβ ; ℓmax Xℓ=ℓmin where the lensing convergence power spectrum is given by [46, 47, 48]: m Z χH H 4 0 Ω2 0 P3D (cid:18) 1 (∆Pκ )2 g 2 (χ) a2 (χ) P κ l = 9 4 (22) (23) , χ(cid:19) dχ. l sinK (χ) where P3D is the 3D nonlinear power spectrum of the matter density fluctuation, δ ; a(χ) is the scale factor; and sinK χ = K −1/2 sin(K 1/2χ) is the comoving angular diameter distance to χ (for the spatially flat universe used in this 10 analysis, this reduces to χ). The weighting function g (χ) is the source-averaged distance ratio given by g (χ) = Z χH sinK (χ′ − χ) sinK (χ′ ) χ where n(χ(z )) is the source redshift distribution normalized by R dz n(z ) = 1. The uncertainty in the observed lensing spectrum is given by: [47, 48] n(χ′ ) dχ′ , (24) is the intrinsic ellipticity of galaxies. For this analysis, we consider a lensing survey with 10% ∆Pκ (ℓ) = s 2 (cid:11)¯n ! , (2ℓ + 1)fsky Pκ (ℓ) + (cid:10)γint 2 where fsky = Θ2π/129600 is the fraction of the sky covered by the gravitational lensing survey of dimension Θ in int(cid:11)1/2 degrees, and (cid:10)γ 2 sky coverage, a median redshift of 1, an average galaxy number density of ¯n = 30 gal/arcmin2 , and intrinsic ellipticities int (cid:11)1/2 (cid:10)γ 2 consider a deeper survey (space-based like) with fsky = 0.10, a median redshift of roughly 1.5, ¯n = 100 gal/arcmin2 , int (cid:11)1/2 and (cid:10)γ 2 ≈ 0.25. We calculate constraints from 10 tomographic bins using this survey. For both surveys, we use ℓmax = 3000 to keep the assumption of a Gaussian shear field valid. = 0.4. We calculate the constraints on the parameters using five tomographic bins for this survey. We also (25) Weak lensing has been recognized as a very powerful probe of dark energy parameters, however, several systematic effects have been identified so far, see [50] and references therein for an overview. In this analysis, we included the effect of the shear calibration bias [43, 49, 53, 54, 55, 56] on our results by marginalizing over its parameters. Because of this bias, the shear is systematically over or under-estimated by a multiplicative factor, and results in an overall rescaling of the shear power spectrum. Following the parameterization discussed in [42], we used the absolute power calibration parameter ζs and the relative calibration parameter ζr between two redshift bins. Another systematic effect that we considered in the analysis is the incomplete knowledge of the source redshift distribution [44, 57]. A remedy to this poor knowledge of the redshift distribution using spectroscopic redshift has been explored recently in [44]. In the present analysis we marginalize over the redshift bias by including the characteristic redshift of the distribution as a systematic parameter zs and we assume a reasonable prior of 0.05 on this parameter. In order to calculate the supernova Fisher matrix, FSN e , we use (see, e.g. [58, 59]) Fαβ = N Xi=1 where DL ≡ H0dL /c is the dimensionless luminosity distance to a supernova, given in a spatially flat model by DL (z ) = (1 + z ) Z z 0 1 σm (DL,i )2 ∂DL,i ∂ pβ . ∂DL,i ∂ pα 1 p(1 − ΩΛ )(1 + z ′)3 + ΩΛQ(z ′ ) dz ′ , (26) (27) 11 where Q(z ) is as defined in Eq.(20). We recall that the SN Ia apparent magnitude as a function of redshift is given by m(z ) = 5 log10 (DL (z )) + M, where M depends as the absolute magnitude of type Ia supernovae as well as on the Hubble parameter H0 . As usual, we treat M as a nuisance parameter. We use two sets of 2000 SNe Ia uniformly distributed with zmax = 0.8 and zmax = 1.5. It is important to briefly note here that there are systematic uncertainties associated with supernova searches: these include luminosity evolution, gravitational lensing and dust; see, e.g. [60] and references therein. In order to partly include the effect of these systematics and the effect of the supernova peculiar velocity uncertainty [62], we follow [60, 61] and use the following quadrature for the effective magnitude uncertainty m = sσ2 ln(10)cz (cid:19)2 m + (cid:18) 5σv σef f where, σv = 500km/sec is the peculiar velocity, and δm is a floor uncertainty in each bin [60, 61]. The quadrature + N{per bin} δ2 m (28) relation (28) assures that there is an uncertainty floor set by the systematic limit δm so that the overall uncertainty per bin cannot be reduced to arbitrarily low values by adding more supernovae. Finally, for the CMB and lensing tomography, we use the generalized form of the Fisher matrix above (e.g. see [23]) as ℓmax ∂ pβ (cid:19) , (ℓ + 1/2)fskyTr (cid:18)C−1 ∂Cℓ Xℓmin ℓ ℓ + N X Y ℓ = C X Y where Cℓ is the covariance matrix of the multipole moments of the observables C X Y ℓ ∂Cℓ ∂ pα Fαβ = C−1 ℓ (29) with N X Y ℓ being the power spectrum of the noise in the measurement. Here X Y takes the values κκ for lensing tomography spectra and cross-spectra, and T T , T E , and EE for CMB spectra. We consider constraints from 1-year data from the Planck satellite. Our findigs are discussed in the next section. B. Summary of results and implications for the cosmological constant/dark energy questions Our results, summarized in table III, show that when WL with multiple-bins tomography is added to the CMB+SN combination, the uncertainties on the equation of state parameter w0 reduce by roughly a factor of 3 and the uncer- tainties on w1 and wa reduce by roughly factors of 3 or 4 at least. Also, we note that the uncertainties on the set {w0 , w1 } are different from those of the set {w0 , wa } showing that the uncertainties are parameterization dependent. The deeper lensing survey, which allows one to implement 10-bins tomography, provides an additional factor of 2 improvement on w1 and wa compared with the 5-bins tomography results. We find that in order to bring the uncer- tainties on both parameters to the order of several percent, very ambitious surveys are required. Current observations 12 TABLE III: Dark energy parameter constraints from various combinations of CMB, Weak Gravitational Lensing and Supernova future surveys. The constraints are (1σ uncertainties) on the two dark energy parameterizations given in section IV A. The uncertainties are calculated using combinations of 1-year data from Planck, 2000 uniformly distributed supernovae with zmax = 0.8, 1.5, a lensing survey with 5-bins tomography, and a very deep lensing survey with 10-bins tomography. The results are presented for the dark energy parameters {w0 , w1} and {w0 , wa}. The systematic effects discussed in section IV A are included in the calculations. Simulated Experiment/Survey Parameterization-1 parameterization-2 σ (w0 ) σ (w1 ) σ (w0 ) σ (wa ) 1-year data from PLANCK + 2000 SN with zmax = 0.8 0.11 0.26 0.13 0.47 1-year data from PLANCK + 2000 SN with zmax = 0.8 0.039 0.092 0.033 0.12 + WL survey with 5-bins tomography, zmed = 1.0 and fsky = 0.10 1-year data from PLANCK + 2000 SN with zmax = 1.5 0.08 0.20 0.10 0.35 1-year data from PLANCK + 2000 SN with zmax = 1.5 0.022 0.043 0.024 0.057 + WL deep survey with 10-bins tomography, zmed = 1.5 and fsky = 0.10 are only able to constrain, with some significance, models with a constant equation of state, i.e. one single parameter with no redshift dependence. For example, the WMAP team recently combined constraints from currently available CMB, large scale structure, and supernova data sets (see table II) and obtained w = −0.926+0.051 −0.057 (table 9 in [41]). Our table III shows the 1-sigma uncertainties on the equations of state parameters, and in order to consider the 2 and 3-sigma constraints, one has to multiply the values found by factors of two and three respectively. Therefore, one can see that even when ambitious surveys are considered the remaining uncertainty is still too large to constrain significantly multiple-parameters dark energy models. However, It will be possible to exclude some proposed models with significant deviations from the cosmological constant parameters, namely w0 = −1, and w1 = 0. These include for example trackers models [63] and some SUGRA inspired models [64] with for example w0 = −0.8 and w1 = 0.3. The most decisive answer will be if the data can show conclusively that dark energy is not a cosmological constant. A very suggestive but less decisive answer will be to show that the dark energy parameters are those of a cosmological constant to a very high level of precision (a few percent, perhaps). But of course, the degeneracy in this case will remain and other tests, beyond the equation of state approach, will be needed. In this case, other tests are also necessary because the problems of the cosmological constant are just re-affirmed. Finally, an important question that need to be addressed in all cases is whether the equation of state obtained is a true or forced equation of state as we explore further below. We discuss in the next sections some possible directions of such tests and illustrate one promising test using cosmological probes. 13 V. RECONSIDERING AND TESTING SOME OF THE ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE OLD COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT AND DARK ENERGY PROBLEMS In this section we propose some examples on how one could question some of the assumptions made about the cosmological constant/dark energy problems and, in some cases, how to put this questioning to the test. A. Cosmological tests beyond the equation of state approach: The expansion history versus the growth rate of large scale structure The approach of the equation of state is certainly an important one. However, an important question that remains after some dark energy parameters are obtained from analyzing observational data is as follows. Is this an effective equation of state of some dark energy component in the Einstein’s equations, or is this just a forced equation of state obtained from fitting dark energy models on the top of some modified gravity at cosmological scales? New tests are necessary in order to address this question. Indeed, of great importance are innovative ways of using current and future astrophysical observations that could distinguish between acceleration models beyond the equation of state. In other words, for the same degenerate effective equation of state, these novel tests could distinguish between dynamical dark energy models, a geometrical cosmological constant, and acceleration due to some modification to the gravity sector, and thus will allow one to test some of the important basic assumptions. Some cosmological probes such as weak gravitational lensing (for reviews, see [50, 51, 52, 56] and references therein) and clusters of galaxies (see for example [21, 22] and references therein) are very rich tools and very promising for identifying this type of test because they provide more than one way to constrain dark energy or cosmic acceleration. Both probes can capture the effect of dark energy on the expansion history and also its effect on the growth rate of large-scale structure (the rate at which clusters and super clusters of galaxies form over the history of the universe). Interestingly, this can be used to identify consistency checks to test the dark energy beyond the equation of state degeneracy. In particular, this could allow one to test dark energy 14 models based on new particles and fields versus cosmic acceleration due to some modification in the curvature sector of the EFE as suggested in some recent studies, see e.g. [65, 74, 75], recent review [15] and references therein. Most importantly, these kinds of consistency checks could be used to test some of the assumptions discussed in this paper, namely on the origin of the intrinsic constant curvature of spacetime. Another test beyond the equation of state and based on the dark energy potential was discussed in [76]. In this paper, we explore an example to demonstrate that tests that go beyond the equation of state degeneracy are possible. An important point for this test is that cosmic acceleration affects cosmology in two ways: 1) It affects the expansion history of the universe by speeding it up, 2) It affects the growth rate of large scale structure in the universe by suppressing it. The idea explored is that, for dark energy models, these two effects must be consistent one with another because their respective functions are mathematically related by General Relativity equations. The presence of significant inconsistencies between the expansion Hubble function and the growth rate function could be the signature of some modified gravity at cosmological scales as we will demonstrate. In order to illustrate how the test works, we will need to use a viable modified gravity model. We choose a model proposed by Dvali, Gabadadze and Porrati (DGP) [65] where the cosmic acceleration is due to the effect of an extra large dimension modifying gravity at cosmological scales. This DGP model is motivated by higher dimensional physics and is not ruled out by current astrophysical observations [66, 69, 79]. We have no particular interest in the phenomenology and precise testing of the viability of this model. We are only interested to use it as an example in order to illustrate the test considered. We refer the interested reader to some studies dedicated to the DGP model phenomenology [69, 70, 71, 81]. We provide here a very brief description of this model but again refer the reader to [65, 67] for a full description. The action for this five-dimensional theory is [65, 67] (4) Z d4xp−g(4)R(4) + Smatter , (5) Z d4x dyp−g(5)R(5) + M 2 M 3 where the subscripts 4 and 5 denote quantities on the brane and in the bulk, respectively; M(5) is the five dimensional S(5) = (30) 1 2 1 2 reduced Planck mass; M(4) = 2.4 × 1018GeV is the four dimensional effective reduced Planck mass; R and g are the Ricci scalar and the determinant of the metric, respectively. The first and second terms on the right hand side describe the bulk and the brane, respectively, while Smatter is the action for matter confined to the brane. The two (5)/2 and M 2 different prefactors M 3 (4)/2 in front of the bulk and brane actions give rise to a characteristic length scale [77], rc = M 2 (4)/2M 3 (5) . If M(5) is much less than M(4) , then the brane terms in the action above will dominate over the bulk terms on scales much smaller than rc , and gravity will appear four dimensional. On scales larger than rc , the full five dimensional physics will be recovered, and the gravitational force law will revert to its five dimensional 1/r3 form. This is usually discussed in terms of gravity leakage into an extra dimension. Ref. [66] shows that tuning M(5) to about 10 − 100MeV, implying rc ∼ H −1 0 , is consistent with cosmological data. They have also been discussed in [79]. Low redshift cosmology in DGP brane worlds was studied in [67, 77]. Following [67], one could define the 15 effective energy density ρrc ≡ 3 c ) so that Friedmann’s first equation becomes (32πGr2 8πG 3 (cid:0)pρ + ρrc + √ρrc (cid:1)2 c H −2 where Ωrc ≡ 1 4 r−2 0 . We focus here on a flat universe (k = 0) containing only nonrelativistic matter, such as (cid:1)2 baryons and cold dark matter, in which Ωrc = (cid:0) 1−Ωm 2 dimension, on large length scales, becomes a substitute for dark energy. . In this model, the gravitational “leakage” into the fifth k a2 = H 2 DGP + (31) . Now, for the standard general relativistic (GR) cosmological model, FLRW, with zero spatial curvature (k=0), and a dark energy component (DE), the expansion history is expressed by the Hubble function and is given by HGR+DE (z ) = H0pΩm (1 + z )3 + (1 − Ωm )Q(z ). And the growth rate of large scale structure G(a=1/(1+z)) is given by integration of the differential equation, [72, 73], 1 + X (a) (cid:21) G′GR+DE G′′GR+DE + (cid:20) 7 w(a) 2 − a where ′ ≡ d/da, G = D/a is the normalized growth rate, Q(a) is as given by equation 20, and Ωm (1 − Ωm )a3Q(a) 1 − w(a) 1 + X (a) GGR+DE a2 X (a) = = 0, (33) (34) (32) 3 2 + 3 2 . On the other part, for the spatially flat DGP model, the expansion Hubble function is given by (1 − Ωm ) + r 1 HDGP (z ) = H0(cid:16) 1 (1 − Ωm )2 + Ωm (1 + z )3(cid:17). 2 4 and the suppression of the growth rate function is given by, [79, 80] where δDGP + 2HDGP δDGP − 4πGρ(cid:0)1 + 1 3β (cid:1)δDGP = 0 (35) (36) HDGP β = 1 − 2rcHDGP (cid:16)1 + DGP (cid:17) 3H 2 We illustrate in Fig.1, Hubble expansion functions and growth rate functions for dark energy and DGP models (37) including the cosmological constant model, ΛCDM. The figure shows that compared to a ΛCDM model with the same 16 24 23.5 23 22.5 22 M - m LCDM: w0=-1, w1=0(cid:10) SUGRA: w0=-0.8, w1=0.3(cid:10) DGP model with Omegam=0.20 DGP model with Omegam=0.27 21.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.9 z a / δ h t w o r G 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 LCDM: w0=-1, w’=0(cid:10) SUGRA: w0=-0.8, w’=0.3(cid:10) DGP model with Omegam=0.20 DGP model with Omegam=0.27 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 a FIG. 1: Supernova Hubble diagrams (Left) and Growth rate functions for dark energy and DGP models. Note that the ΛCDM model (red solid line) and the Ωm = 0.20 DGP model (blue dotted) have degenerate Hubble diagrams, but different growth rates. The degeneracy of the Hubble diagrams is even stronger for SUGRA (green dashed) and Ωm = 0.27 DGP (black double dotted) models. Interestingly, the growth rate in the Ωm = 0.27 DGP model is suppressed with respect to that in the ΛCDM model, which has the same Ωm . matter density, a DGP model has a distinct suppression of the growth rate. Also, Fig.1b displays how the degenerate models of Fig.1a show distinct growth rate functions. The basic idea for the test explored is that equations (32) and (33) must be mathematically consistent one with another via General Relativity. Similarly, equations (35) and (36) must be consistent one with another via DGP theory. A consistency cross-check of these two functions constitute a test for the fundamental underlying theory. In order to apply the test discussed below, we assume the availability of a sample of NSN e = 2000 type Ia supernova, evenly distributed in redshift between zM in = 0 and zM ax = 1.7, with a magnitude uncertainty per supernova of σm = 0.2. As discussed in section IV A, we also include systematic effects using the quadrature (28). We also assume the availability of measurements of the growth rate in twenty bins evenly spaced in the scale factor a, between amin = 0.25 and amax = 1 and an uncertainty of σG (a)/G(a) = 0.02. In order to break the usual degeneracy between Ωm and the equation of state parameters, we add to the SN Ia data and to the growth rate measurements a constraint from the CMB shift parameter. The CMB shift parameter for a spatially flat universe is given by m R zC M B R = Ω1/2 0 reports that the value of R from current data is Robs = 1.716 ± 0.062. In order to demonstrate the working of the consistency check we proceed as follows: We assume that the true dz H/H0 (z) , where zCM B = 1089 is the redshift of the surface of last scattering, given in [2]. Ref. [82] (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) 17 cosmology is described by a DGP model and simulate the expansion and growth data using a fiducial DGP model. Then we ask what contradictions arise when the data are instead analyzed based on the assumption of a dark energy model (as mentioned earlier, we are not particularly interested in the DGP cosmology here but we want to use it as an example to illustrate the procedure.) Because we will generate the data using the DGP model, the consistency relation from General Relativity between the expansion history and the growth rate of large scale structure will be broken. The dark energy equation of state wexp (z ) which best fits measurements of the expansion will not be consistent with the equation of state wgrowth (z ) which best fits measurements of the growth. The methods and steps we use are as follows: i) We use a fiducial DGP model with Ωm = 0.27 and simulate the data for the expansion and the growth rate. We generate supernova magnitudes, a growth rate function, and the CMB shift parameter ii) We use a χ2 minimization method in order to find the best fit dark energy model to the expansion. We obtain the best fit model to the supernova magnitudes and the CMB shift parameter with a first dark energy parameter space {Ωde , w0 , w1 }. The χ2 minimization method was discussed in detail in [35] and was shown to give similar results to those from Monte Carlo Markov Chain method although the χ2 minimization can have a better handle on degeneracies [35]) iii) We use the χ2 minimization in order to find the best fit dark energy model to measurements of the growth rate of large scale structure. We determine the best fit model to the growth rate function and the CMB shift parameter and obtain a second dark energy parameter space {Ω′de , w′0 , w′1} iv) Next, we use a standard Fisher matrix approach to calculate the confidence regions (or χ2 contours) around the two best fit dark energy models (this standard procedure is discussed in detail in references [45]) v) Then, we compare the allowed regions in the {Ωde , w0 , w1 } parameter space between the two data combinations in order to look for inconsistencies Our results, in figure 2, show that the two allowed regions in the dark energy parameter space are significantly different. This signals the expected inconsistency between the expansion history and the growth rate of large scale structure. The source of the inconsistency is from point (i) where the data was generated using a DGP model, i.e. from our hypothesis that the true cosmology is that of a modified gravity DGP model. Thus, the inconsistency 18 1 w 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 SN + CMB Shift (1,2 sigma) GF + CMB Shift (1,2 sigma) Omega_de 0.9 0.88 0.86 0.84 0.82 0.8 0.78 0.76 –1.8 –1.6 –1.4 –1.2 w_0 –1 –0.8 –0.6 –0.6 –0.4 –0.2 0 0.4 0.2 w_1 0.8 0.6 1 -1.8 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 w0 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 FIG. 2: LEFT(2D): Best fit equations of state: Solid contours are for fits to SN Ia simulated data and the CMB shift parameter R, while dashed contours are for fits to the growth-rate simulated data and the CMB shift parameter. RIGHT(3D): Best fit Dark Energy parameter spaces (Ωde , w0 , w1 ). The ellipsoid to the right of the 3D-figure is for fit to SN Ia simulated data and the CMB shift parameter, while the ellipsoid to the left (3D-figure) is for fits to the growth rate simulated data and the CMB shift parameter data. For both figures, the significant difference (inconsistency) between the parameter spaces found using the two combinations is due to the DGP model assumed by hypothesis and used to simulate the data. The inconsistency is thus an indication that cosmic acceleration in this case is due to modified gravity at cosmological scales rather then a Dark Energy component. constitute an observational detection of the assumed underlying modified gravity model. And finding two significantly different equations of state implies that these are not true but forced ones. The test is based on the comparison of measurements of the expansion history and measurements of the growth rate of large scale structure and shows that we can go beyond the equation of state analysis. We demonstrated here the working of consistency tests based on this comparison and provided a preliminary implemention in [83]. Other works that explored the same idea include [84, 85]. Future work is needed in order to make these tests more robust and generic: e.g. to consider other dark energy models (with couplings, unusual sound speeds), other modified gravity models, and comparison with systematic effects of the probes. Another interesting approach was discussed in reference [86] where the authors considered signatures of quintessence models and their extension to scalar-tensor gravity on weak gravitational lensing observables. They found that some models can let an imprint of ten percent on lensing observables. The important point from these examples and others is that cosmological observations that can probe the growth of cosmological perturbations are promising tools to learn about the acceleration of the universe beyond the effective equation of state degeneracy. 19 B. The Weyl-Lovelock theorem as an argument against the full identification of the cosmological constant with vacuum energy Based on the following theorems, one could argue against the full identification of the cosmological constant with vacuum energy. Indeed, Cartan [87], Weyl [88] and Vermeil [89] proved different theorems showing that the only tensor of valency two, Aαβ , that is: a) constructed from the metric tensor gαβ and its first two partial derivatives, gαβ ,γ and gαβ ,γ δ , b) divergence free, i.e. Aαβ ;β = 0, c) symmetric, i.e. Aαβ = Aβα , d) linear in the second derivatives of gαβ , is Aαβ = c1Gαβ + c2gαβ (38) where c1 and c2 are constants and Gαβ is the Einstein tensor (2). Lovelock [90, 91] showed that conditions c) and d) are superfluous when the spacetime dimension is 4. (Note that when Aαβ is put in the EFE, c1 is absorbed in the κ factor.) In Refs. [88] and [87], it was first proven that the most general curvature tensor Aαβ is a linear combination of Rαβ , Rgαβ and gαβ , i.e. of the form Aαβ = aRαβ + bRgαβ + cgαβ , (39) where a, b, and c are constants. Then values a = 1 and b = − 1 2 are derived from the divergence free condition (conservation law). Consequently, one is tempted to take the standpoint that unless one is guided by some physical laws or measure- ments, setting the constant c (i.e. Λ) in equation (39) to any particular value, including zero is unjustifiable. Imposing a priori a particular value on Λ (for instance zero) is perhaps making the same mistake Einstein did by putting the particular value ΛE instein = 4 9C 2 (40) (for a closed static universe) where C is as defined previously, after equation (4). Thus, this suggests that a geometrical constant Λ-term in the EFE (1) is part of the equations on its own right with no reference to any energy momentum tensor. This could be used as an argument not in favor of the exact identification of the geometrical cosmological constant with vacuum energy. 20 C. What are the implications of the simplest solution in view of principles of General Relativity? As discussed in the previous sections, some of the assumptions underlying the cosmological constant problems are not unquestionable and it is important to find ways to challenge them and put them to the test. Needless to recall, the simplest solution can arise from, first, abandoning the assumed identification of the cosmo- logical constant with vacuum energy (based on the theorems discussed in the previous sub-section V B), and second, putting on the side the cosmic coincidence (see section III for a discussion). The remaining question is then why the huge vacuum energy densities (see section II B) from quantum field theory estimations do not contribute to the energy budget in the universe. This question can be legitimately replaced by, how does vacuum energy contribute to the EFE? For example, is it correct to try to add contributions from vacuum energy density to the EFE using some ultra-violet cutoff energy? We discuss this point more in section V D, see also [93, 94, 95, 96]. Further, did we really exhaust all possibility of exact cancelation mechanisms for vacuum energy? [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. It is perhaps worth mentioning that a rather negative vacuum energy/cosmological constant was expected within some candidates for a unified theory such as String Theory [98], as there is no attractive way to derive a stable vacuum with a positive cosmological constant [98]. So, in addition to the magnitude problems, could this sign problem be a further indication to revise the full identification above? In this simple solution, what is measured currently is simply an intrinsic curvature of the spacetime, and the value of Λ is just a constant measured from experiments, as is Newton’s gravitational constant G. At this point, we would like to discuss the following subtle point. The usual aesthetic interpretation of one of General Relativity’s principles is that the mass-energy content of the universe creates curvature of the spacetime (assuming a zero Weyl tensor as in standard FLRW cosmology). One could then ask the following question: if spacetime is to have a curvature in absence of mass-energy sources and this curvature is not due to vacuum energy then what is generating this curvature? There are two possible answers to the question: If one wants to preserve the interpretation above, then one needs to explain the source of this curvature. However, it is also correct to take the other standpoint and consider that the Einstein field equations are a set of differential equations containing a cosmological constant and 21 governing the laws of General Relativity, and that in absence of sources the trivial spacetime is simply de Sitter with an intrinsic curvature. The simple solution we discussed in this section is of the latter type and is a consequence of questioning some of the assumptions usually made. To our best knowledge, this particular simple but subtle point about loosing the aesthetic interpretation above has not been discussed in literature about dark energy. With these reconsiderations in mind, it is important to think about identifying new astrophysical tests or experi- ments at the interface of particle and gravitational physics, as we discuss in the next sub-section. D. Vacuum energy and Casimir effect in gravitational and cosmological contexts Another possible successful approach to the cosmological constant problems is to think of a situation or an ex- periment where the validity of the cosmological constant-vacuum energy identification can be put to the test. A geometrical cosmological constant has no quantum properties while vacuum energy has both gravitational and quan- tum properties. Also, is it possible to learn more on how vacuum energy contributes to the cosmological constant? Some of these questions started to be addressed in the literature as we cite further. It is perhaps relevant at this point to recall the Casimir effect [99] which is a purely quantum field theory phenomenon (see [100] for a recent comprehensive review, and references therein.) The Casimir effect results from a change in the zero-point oscillations spectrum of a quantized field when the quantization domain is restricted or when the topology of the space is non-trivial. For example, a Casimir force appears as the result of the alteration of the vacuum energy by some boundaries. In its simplest form, predicted by Casimir [99], two neutral plane parallel conducting plates placed in a vacuum at a distance a from one another will experience an attractive force FC = − π2 ¯hc 240a4 S where S ≫ a is the plate area. The Casimir effect has been now extensively measured with a few percent precision [100]. Cosmologically, the Casimir effect is significant when the topology of the model of the universe is non-trivial (different from an infinite Euclidean topology), see e.g. [101]. The effect has been discussed in models with non-trivial topology, notably the simple case of a closed FRW universe with a 3-torus topology, see e.g. [102]. Also, the Casimir energy has been used from compact extra dimensions [94, 95, 96] to discuss the cosmological constant problem, and with models with supersymmetric large extra dimensions to propose cancelation mechanisms for the cosmological constant problem, see e.g. [97]. In a more relevant context for our discussion, one would like to study, via the Casimir effect, the gravitational properties of the vacuum energy. For example, Refs. [103, 104] calculated correction terms to the Casimir force due 22 to the weak gravitational field. Such corrections represent the effect of gravitational curvature on quantum vacuum fluctuations. The authors of Ref. [104] evaluated the order of the force acting on a Casimir apparatus redshifting in a weak gravitational field and concluded that, although some issues with signal modulation need to be solved, testing such force should be feasible and within reach of present technological resources. Now, related to our question on how the vacuum energy may fit within the EFE, it has been argued in some papers, see for example [94, 95, 96], that as the measured Casimir effect is related to vacuum energy differences, the vacuum energy may not contribute to the cosmological dynamics via some fixed cutoff energy but rather via energy differences as in Casimir energy. This Casimir energy can be produced from some compact extra dimensions [94, 95, 96] or non-trivial topology of the spacetime [101]. We could state that if this is the case, then as we have not yet detected any non-trivial topology for a wide rang of models [105], this could imply the vanishing of the vacuum energy contribution at cosmological scales. On the other hand, not all non-trivial topologies have been ruled out and one could push the idea further. Therefore, questioning and testing how vacuum energy contributes to the cosmological constant using, for example, the Casimir effect in a cosmological context may prove helpful to the dark energy questions. VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS We discussed different formulations of the cosmological constant/dark energy problems and some of the assumptions underlying them. We argued for the usefulness of clarifying and questioning some of these assumptions and identifying new strategies in order to put them to the test. We used some fraction calculations in order to evaluate how much of a fine-tuning is involved in the cosmic coincidence. We found that these fractions are of the order of a few percent even in the worst cases. This is significant but not totally unusual in physics and astrophysics. Therefore, on one hand, it remains perhaps a motivated and interesting problem to seek models that could naturally explain these numbers. On the other hand, it was important to clarify that this fine tuning should not constitute a barrier that rejects a successful solution for the other cosmological constant problems. Current and future plans are focused on constraining the equation of state of dark energy using cosmological probes. This is certainly an important approach and some progress has been made, however as we showed in section IV, constraining a variable equation of state will require very sophisticated and challanging future experiments. Furtheremore, this approach is limited in the kind of decisive answers it could provide on the nature of dark energy. 23 Indeed, unless we are lucky enough to find a dark energy that has an equation of state significantly different from that of a cosmological constant, new kinds of tests or experiments will be necessary in order to provide conclusive answers to the dark energy problem. For example, finding that dark energy parameters are those of a cosmological constant to a few percent precision will be very suggestive but will require tests different from the equation of state in order to rule out decisively dynamical dark energy models. Now, even if we are ready to accept some high level of precision to be satisfactory (or if we reach fundamental limitations of our experiments), finding dark energy parameters that are characteristic of a cosmological constant will only confirm the cosmological constant problems with no further clues. Further, once an equation of state is determined from cosmological observations, one is always left with the following question: Is this an effective equation of state of some dark energy component in the energy momentum tensor or is this a forced equation of state obtained by fitting dark energy models on the top of some modified model of gravity? Therefore it is important to encourage other directions and strategies for approaching the dark energy problems. In particular, we discussed the relevance of questioning and challenging some of the assumptions underlying the formulation of the cosmological constant problems in order to look for new types of tests. Next, we showed that comparing cosmological observations of the expansion history and cosmological observations of the growth rate of large-scale structure can distinguish between cosmic acceleration due to some dark energy models and cosmic acceleration due to some modification to gravity physics at cosmological scales. The basic idea is that the effect of cosmic acceleration on the expansion function and its effect on the growth rate function must be mathematically consistent one with another because of the underlying gravity theory (General Relativity). As shown in section V-A, the failure in the consistency relation can be used as a test to distinguish between cosmic acceleration due to dark energy models and acceleration due to modified gravity at cosmological scales. This consistency test shows the potential of some cosmological probes such as, supernova searches, gravitational lensing and clusters of galaxies to go beyond the equation of state approach in order to address the cosmological constant/dark energy questions. Next, motivated by some theorems on the most general curvature tensor in the Einstein field equations, we argued that the identification of the cosmological constant with the vacuum energy is not unquestionable and might bring some limitations of its own because it changes the formulation of the old cosmological constant problem. Recall that as a result of this questioning, dark energy can be identified as a simple geometrical cosmological constant. In the absence of sources, the trivial spacetime is then de Sitter with an intrinsic constant curvature. However, then two questions arise. i) An important interpretation of one of principles of General Relativity is that the mass-energy content of the universe creates curvature of the spacetime. One could then ask the following question: if spacetime is 24 to have a curvature in the absence of mass-energy sources, and this curvature is not due to vacuum energy, then what is generating this curvature? There are two possible answers to this question: If we want to preserve the interpretation above then we do need to explain this curvature. However, it is fully correct to take the other standpoint and consider that the Einstein field equations are a set of differential equations containing a cosmological constant and governing the laws of gravity (General Relativity), and that in the absence of sources, spacetime has an intrinsic constant curvature. This last possibility requires one to sacrifice the important interpretation mentioned above. ii) The second question is why would the huge vacuum energy densities evaluated from quantum field theory calculations not contribute to the measured effective cosmological constant? As we discussed, this question could be re-addressed in the context of how the vacuum energy may contribute to the Einstein field equations. In particular, is the usual method of using a given ultraviolet cutoff energy as a source of gravity questionable? For example, other propositions have been made in literature [94, 95, 96] where vacuum energy will contribute via energy differences as experienced with the Casimir effect. Finally, we pointed out the possible role of the Casimir effect used in gravitational and cosmological contexts for testing some of the assumptions and questions discussed. This is a purely quantum field theory phenomenon and could be used to look for clues on how the vacuum energy may fit within the Einstein field equations. Other kinds of experiments at the interface between quantum field theory and general relativistic principles have been also discussed in [106, 107, 108, 109] and might be of similar interest. We conclude that challenging some of the assumptions underlying the formulation of the cosmological constant/dark energy problems and putting them to the test may prove useful and necessary to make progress on these questions. Acknowledgments The author thanks Latham Boyle, Simon DeDeo, G.F.R. Ellis, Chris Hirata, Pat McDonald, David Spergel, Paul Steinhardt, and Amol Upadhye for useful comments. The author thanks James Richardson for reading the manuscript. This is not a review paper and we acknowledge that the list of references cited here is incomplete. We tried to provide only some examples from the literature when necessary. Partial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and NASA Theory Award NNG04GK55G at Princeton University is acknowledged. The author acknowledges the partial support from the Hoblitzelle Foundation and a Clark award at the University of Texas at Dallas. FRW dust+Lambda FRW dust 2e-171 FRW dust+Lambda FRW dust 25 b a d c R d c b a R = K e ; b a d c R e ; d c b a R = K 0 0 5e+27 1e+28 t 1.5e+28 2e+28 1.6e+28 1.8e+28 2e+28 2.2e+28 2.4e+28 2.6e+28 2.8e+28 3e+28 t FIG. 3: a) Plot of the curvature invariant K = Rαβ γδ Rγδ αβ . b) Plot of the differential invariant DiRiem = Rαβ γδ ;η Rγδ αβ ;η . The curvature decreases during a matter dominated universe to reach a constant curvature Lambda-dominated universe. Length units are used with Λ = 10−56 cm−2 . We also display on the left vertical lines for cttransition = 0.67 × 1028 cm and ctρΛ=ρm = 0.90 × 1028 cm. APPENDIX A: EXAMPLES OF SPACETIME CURVATURE INCLUDING A COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT In order to plot the evolution of spacetime curvature with a cosmological constant, we consider curvature invariants constructed from the Riemann tensor, Rαβγ δ . These scalars allow a coordinate independent study of some geometrical features of a spacetime. They can also be linked to physical quantities via the EFE. For the special spacetimes we consider here the invariants are all related via algebraic relations [110, 111], and for the sake of simplicity we just choose here the Kretchman scalar, and the differential invariant K = Rαβ γ δ Rγ δ αβ DiRiem = Rαβ γ δ ;η Rγ δ αβ ;η and to trace the evolution of the curvature of spacetime. For the metric (5), the invariants read √3Λ √3Λ t(cid:1)(cid:17)2 t(cid:1)(cid:17)4 K = Λ2 h 5 3 (cid:16) coth (cid:0) − 2(cid:16) coth (cid:0) 2 2 √3Λ 2 t(cid:1)(cid:17)2 DiRiem = −9Λ3 (cid:16) coth (cid:0) 2 t(cid:1)(cid:17)4 . √3Λ (cid:16) sinh (cid:0) + 3i (A1) (A2) (A3) (A4) 1.005e-49 FRW dust+Lambda FRW dust FRW dust+Lambda FRW dust 26 x t x t R y x y x R -1e-49 0 5e+27 1e+28 t 1.5e+28 2e+28 0 0 2e+27 4e+27 6e+27 8e+27 1e+28 t FIG. 4: a) LEFT: Plot of the Riemnann components Rtxtx = Rty ty = Rtztz . It starts with a power law decrease to reach a negative range exponential decrease during a de Sitter phase. For comparison, the no-Lambda curve shows how this component continues with a power law decrease within a positive range. Length units are used with Λ = 10−56 cm−2 . We display vertical for cttransition = 0.67 × 1028 cm and ctρΛ=ρm = 0.90 × 1028 cm. b) RIGHT: Plot of the Riemann components Rxyxy = Rxzxz = Ryzyz . The profile is similar to that of the scale factor. These components transit to an exponential increase at very large t. We also display cttransition = 0.67 × 1028 cm and ctρΛ=ρm = 0.90 × 1028 cm. For the matter dominated universe, these are simply given by, K = 80 37 has the usual line element t4 and DiRiem = − 60 1 3 1 t6 . The de Sitter space ds2 = −dt2 + exp (cid:0)2r Λ 3 and constant curvature with K = 3 8 Λ2 . Figure 3a and Figure 3b show the profile of K and DiRiem and how the spacetime curvature decreases during the expanding matter dominated universe to reach a constant curvature Λ-dominated universe at late times. This can t(cid:1)(dr2 + r2 dΩ2 ) (A5) also be seen from taking the limits of (A3) and (A4) at very large t. The vertical lines in Figure 3a are the time at equality of dark energy density with matter energy density and the time of transition from deceleration to acceleration. The no-Lambda curves are shown for comparison. Furthermore, in order to trace some features of the curvature lost in the squared quantities, we recourse to plotting directly the non-vanishing components of the Riemann tensor. Though coordinate dependent, these can be informative [17]. Schwartzschild-de Sitter Schwartzschild 27 1 100000 1e+10 1e+15 1e+20 1e+25 1e+30 1e+35 t b a d c R d c b a R = K 1e+50 1 1e-50 1e-100 1e-150 1e-200 FIG. 5: Plot of K = Rαβ γδ Rγδ αβ as a function of r . The curvature decreases as 1/r2 from the central mass m to become dominated by the Λ term after r 3 Λ2 = 48m2 8 r2 m = 0.74 × 1017 cm. In cartesian coordinates, these are: = .36 × 1025 cm. Length units are used with Λ = 10−56 cm−2 and a mass Λ (cid:17)2/3 6 (cid:16) 3C Λ × Rtxtx = Rtyty = Rtztz = √3Λ √3Λ t(cid:1)(cid:17)−2/3 t(cid:1)(cid:17)4/3 i h(cid:16) sinh (cid:0) − 2(cid:16) sinh (cid:0) 2 2 (A6) and Λ (cid:17)4/3 Rxyxy = Rxzxz = Ryzyz = 31/3Λ(cid:16) C × √3Λ √3Λ t(cid:1)(cid:17)2/3 i t(cid:1)(cid:17)8/3 + (cid:16) sinh (cid:0) h(cid:16) sinh (cid:0) 2 2 The time evolution of the Rtxtx components is shown in Figure 4a where it starts with a power law decrease to (A7) reach a negative range exponential decrease during a de Sitter phase. For comparison, the no-λ curve shows how this component continues with power law decrease within a positive range. Figure 4b shows that the profile of the Rxyxy component is similar to that of the scale factor. This component transits to an exponential increase at very large t. Also, we consider another informative example, the Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime with Λr2 2m ds2 = −(cid:16)1 − 3 (cid:1)dt2 + r − Λr2 2m (cid:16)1 − 3 (cid:1)−1 dr2 + r2 dΩ2 . r − At large r, it tends to the de Sitter space limit. The explicit de Sitter case is obtained by setting m = 0 while the (A8) explicit Schwarzschild case is obtained by setting Λ = 0. Here, for (A8) K = 8 3 Λ2 + 48m2 r2 28 (A9) and is plotted in Figure (5) where the curvature due to the central mass m decreases as a function of r and is overtaken by the Λ term at very large r. The Schwarzschild curve is plotted for comparison. [] Electronic Address: [email protected]; Part of this work was written when the author was a research associate at Princeton University. [1] A. G. Riess, et. al., Astron.J. 116 1009 (1998); P. M. Garnavich et. al., Astrophys.J. 509 74 (1998); A. V. Filippenko and A. G. Riess, Phys.Rept. 307 31 (1998); S. Perlmutter, et. al., Astrophys.J. 517 565 (1999); S. Perlmutter, et. al., Bull.Am.Astron.Soc. 29 1351 (1997); A. G. Riess, et. al., Astrophys.J. 536 62 (2000); A. G. Riess, et. al., Astrophys.J. 560 49 (2001); J. L. Tonry, et. al., Astrophys.J. 594 1 (2003); R. A. Knop, et. al., Astrophys. J. 598 102 (2003); B. J. Barris, et. al., Astrophys.J. 602 571 (2004); A. G. Riess, et. al., Astrophys. J. 607 665 (2004); C. L. Bennett, et. al., Astrophys.J.Suppl. 148 1 (2003). [2] D.N. Spergel et al., Astrophys. J. Supp., 148, 175 (2003); L. Page L. et al., Astrophys.J.Suppl. 148 (2003) 233. [3] B. Netterfield et al, Ap. J., 571, 604 (2002); P. de Bernardis et al, Nature, 404, 955 (2000). [4] M. Tegmark et al., Astrophys.J. 606 702 (2004); N. Afshordi, Y.-S. Loh, and M. A. Strauss, Phys. Rev. D 69 083524 (2004). [5] R. Carlberg et al, Astrophys. J. 478, 462 (1997); N. Bahcall et al, Astrophys. J. 541, 1 (2000). [6] W.L. Freedman et al., Astrophys. J. , 553, 47 (2001). [7] P. Fosalba, E. Gaztanaga, and F. Castander, Astrophys.J. 597 L89 (2003); P. Fosalba and E Gaztanaga, Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 350 L37 (2004); R. Scranton, et. al., preprint astro-ph/0307249 (2003); N. Afshordi, Y.-S. Loh, and M. A. Strauss, Phys. Rev. D 69 083524 (2004); S. Boughn and R. Crittenden, Nature, 427 6969 (2004); N. Padmanabhan et al., Phys. Rev. D. 70, 103501 (2004). [8] S. Weinberg Rev. Mod. Phys., 61, 1 (1989). [9] S.M.Carroll, W.H. Press and E.L. Turner, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 30, 499 (1992). [10] M.S. Turner, Phys. Rep., 333, 619 (2000). [11] Varun Sahni, Alexei Starobinsky Int.J.Mod.Phys. D9, 373 (2000). [12] S.M. Carroll, Living Reviews in Relativity, 4, 1 (2001). [13] T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rep., 380, 335 (2003). [14] P.J.E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559 (2003). 29 [15] E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, S. Tsujikawa Int.J.Mod.Phys. D15 (2006) 1753-1936 [16] P.J.E Peebles and B.Ratra, Astrophys.J.Lett. 325 L17 (1988); B.Ratra and P.J.E. Peebles, Phys.Rev.D 37 3406 (1988); C. Wetterich, Ncl. Phys. B 302, 668 (1988); I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 896 (1999); P.J.Steinhardt, L. Wang, and I.Zlatev, Phys. Rev. D 59 123504 (1999). [17] C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco 1973). [18] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity, (Wiley, New York, 1972). [19] R.A. D’Inverno, Introducing Einstein’s Relativity (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996). [20] W. Rindler, Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological Second Edition (Oxford University Press, 2006). [21] J.J. Mohr, astro-ph/0408484 . Observing Dark Energy, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 339, Proceedings of a meeting held 18-20 March 2004 in Tucson, Arizona. Edited by Sidney C. Wolff and Tod R. Lauer. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2005., p.140 [22] S. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. D, 70, 123008 (2004). [23] Hu W., Phys. Rev. D 65, 023003 (2001) [24] Takada M., Jain B., 2004, MNRAS, 348, 897 [25] M. Ishak, MNRAS, 363, 469-478 (2005). [26] Cole, et.al., MNRAS, 362, 505 (2005). [27] D. Eisenstein, et.al., ApJ, 633, 560 (2005). [28] Montroy, et.al., ApJ, 647, 799 (2006). [29] Kuo, et.al., 2004, ApJ, 600, 32 (2004). [30] Readhead, et.al., ApJ, 609, 498 (2004). [31] Dickinson, et.al., MNRAS, 353, 732 (2004). [32] M. Tegmark, et.al., ApJ, 606, 702 (2004). [33] Astier, et.al., AA, 447, 31 (2006). [34] A. Riess, et.al., ApJ, 607, 665 (2004). [35] A. Upadhye, M. Ishak, and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys.Rev. D72, 063501(2005). [36] M. Chevallier, D. Polarski, and A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213 (2001). [37] E. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 091301 (2003). [38] Y. Wang, D. N. Spergel, M. A. Strauss, Astrophys.J. 510, 20 (1999) [45] Press et al., Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press (1992); S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology, Academic Press (2003); Tegmark, Taylor, and Heavens, Astrophys.J. 480, 22 (1997). [40] C.L. Bennett, et al., Astrophys. J. Supp., 148, 1 (2003) [41] D.N. Spergel , et al., Astrophys.J.Suppl. 170, 377 (2007). [42] M. Ishak, C. M. Hirata, P. McDonald, U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 69, 083514 (2004). [43] C. Hirata, U. Seljak, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 343, 459 (2003). [44] Ishak M., Hirata C., Phys. Rev. D, 71, 023002 (2005) [45] Press et al., Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press (1992); S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology, Academic Press (2003); Tegmark, Taylor, and Heavens, Astrophys.J. 480, 22 (1997). 30 [46] B. Jain, U. Seljak, Astrophys. J. , 484, 560 (1997). [47] N. Kaiser, Astrophys. J. , 498, 26 (1998). [48] N. Kaiser, Astrophys. J. , 388, 272 (1992). [49] N. Kaiser, Astrophys. J. , 537, 555 (2000). [50] A. Refregier, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.41, 645 (2003) [51] M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider, Phys. Rep.340, 291 (2001) [52] Y. Mellier, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.37, 127 (1999) [53] T. Erben et al., a, 366, 717 (2001). [54] D.J. Bacon, et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 325, 1065 (2001). [55] G. Bernstein, M. Jarvis, Astron. J.123, 583 (2002). [56] L. Van Waerbeke and Y. Mellier, astro-ph/0305089 . Lecture given at the Aussois winter school, (2003). [57] Wittman et al., Nature, 405, 143 (2000). [58] M. Tegmark et al., astro-ph/9805117 (1998). [59] D. Huterer, M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D, 64, 123527 (2001). [60] G. Aldering G., et al., for the SNAP pro ject collaboration, astro-ph/0405232 (2003). [61] Kim et al., 2003, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 347, 909 (2004). [62] J.L. Tonry, et al, Astrophys. J. , 594, 1 (2003). [63] I. Zlatev, L. Wang, P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999). [64] P. Brax, J. Martin, Phys. Lett. B, 468, 40 (1999). [65] G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadzi, and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B 485, 208 (2000). [66] C. Deffayet, et. al., Phys. Rev. D 66, 024019 (2002). [67] C. Deffayet, G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, Phys.Rev. D 65 044023 (2002). [79] A. Lue, R. Scoccimarro, G. Starkman,. Phys. Rev. D 69, 124015 (2004). [69] A. Lue, Phys. Rept. 423,1 (2006). [70] I. Sawicki, S. M. Carroll, preprint astro-ph/0510364 . [71] M. Fairbairn, A. Goobar, preprint astro-ph/0511029 . 31 [72] C.P. Ma, R. R. Caldwell, P. Bode, L. Wang, Astrophys. J. , 521, L1 (1999) [73] E. Linder, A. Jenkins, MNRAS, 346, 573 (2003). [74] S. Carroll et al., Phys.Rev. D71 063513 (2005). [75] S. Capozziello, V.F. Cardone, A. Troisi, Phys.Rev. D 71 043503 (2005). [76] J. Simon, L. Verde, R. Jimenez, Phys.Rev. D71 123001(2005). [77] C. Deffayet, Phys. Lett. B 502, 199-208 (2001). [78] C. Deffayet, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103504 (2002). [79] A. Lue, R. Scoccimarro, G. Starkman,. Phys. Rev. D 69, 124015 (2004) [80] K. Koyama, R. Maartens JCAP 601, 16 (2006) [81] C. Deffayet, S. J. Landau, J. Raux, M. Zaldarriaga, P. Astier, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024019 (2002). [82] Y. Wang and M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 241302 (2004). [83] M. Ishak, A. Upadhye, D.N. Spergel, Phys. Rev. D 74, 043513 (2006) (astro-ph/0507184 (2005)). [84] L. Knox, Y. Song, and J. A. Tyson Phys. Rev. D 74, 023512 (2006) (astro-ph/0503644 (2005)). [85] E. V. Linder, Phys.Rev. D72 043529 (2005). (astro-ph/0507263 (2005)). [86] C. Schimd, J.P. Uzan, and A. Riazuelo, Phys.Rev. D 71 083512 (2005). [87] E. Cartan, J. Math. Pure Appl., 1, 141 (1922). [88] H. Weyl, Space, time, matter (Dover, New York, 1922). [89] H. Vermeil, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gottingen, 334 (1917). [90] D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys., 12, 498 (1971). [91] D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys., 13, 874 (1972). [92] S.M. Carroll astro-ph/0107571 . [93] T. Padmanadhan, Class.Quant.Grav. 22, L107-L110 (2005) [94] K. A. Milton, Grav.Cosmol. 8, 65 (2002). ibid 9, 66 (2003). [95] K. A. Milton, R. Kantowski, C. Kao, Y. Wang Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 2281 (2001). [96] P. O. Mazur, E. Mottola, gr-qc/0405111 . Contributed talk at the Sixth Workshop on ’Quantum Field Theory Under The Influence Of External Conditions’ held at the Univ. of Oklahoma, September 15-19, 2003, to be published in the Proceedings by Rinton Press (2004) [97] C. P. Burgess, hep-th/0411140, THE NEW COSMOLOGY: Conference on Strings and Cosmology; The Mitchell Sympo- sium on Observational Cosmology. AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 743, pp. 417-449 (2004). [98] E. Witten, hep-ph/0002297. Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe. Fourth International Symposium, held February 23-25, 2000, at Marina del Rey, California, USA. Edited by David B. Cline. Published by Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, ISBN 3-540-41216-6, p.27 32 [99] H. Casimir Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793 (1948). [100] M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, V.M. Mostepanenko Phys. Rep.353, 1 (2001). [101] M. Lachieze-Rey, J.P. Luminet, Phys. Rep.C254, 135 (1995). [102] Y.B. Zeldovich, A.A Starobinsky Pisma v Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, 10, 323 (1984). [103] R. R. Caldwell astro-ph/0209312 [104] E. Calloni, L. Di Fiore, G. Esposito, L. Milano, L. Rosa, Phys. Lett. A 297, 328 (2002). [105] N. J. Cornish, D. N. Spergel, G. D. Starkman, E. Komatsu Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 201302 (2004). [106] S. Reynaud, A. Lambrecht, C. Genet, M.T Jaekel C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 2-IV (2001) p.1287-1298. (quant-ph/0105053) (2001). [107] M.T. Jaekel, S, Reynaud Rept. Prog. Phys. 60, 863 (1997). [108] L. Viola, R. Onofrio Phys. Rev. D 55, 455 (1997). [109] G. Papini, gr-qc/0110056 . Proceedings of the 17th Course of the International School of Cosmology and Gravitation ”Advances in the interplay between quantum and gravity physics” edited by V. De Sabbata and A. Zheltukhin, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht [110] J. Carot and da Costa, Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 461 (1993). [111] K. Santosuosso, D. Pollney, N. Pelavas, P. Musgrave and K. Lake, Computer Physics Communications 115, 381 (1998).
astro-ph/0208479	1	0208	2002-08-27T17:30:14	Discovery of a peculiar DQ white dwarf	[ "astro-ph" ]	We report the discovery of a new carbon rich white dwarf that was identified during a proper motion survey for cool white dwarfs based on photographic material used for the construction of the Guide Star Catalog II. Its large proper motion (0.48 arcsec/yr) and faint apparent magnitude (V = 18.7) suggest a nearby object of low luminosity. A low-resolution spectrum taken with the William Herschel Telescope clearly shows strong C2 Deslandres-d'Azambuja and Swan bands, which identify the star as a DQ white dwarf. The strength of the Deslandres-d'Azambuja bands and the depression of the continuum in the Swan-band region are signs of enhanced carbon abundance for the given Teff. Comparison of our spectrophotometric data to published synthetic spectra suggests 6000 K < Teff < 8000 K although further analysis with specialized synthetic models appear necessary to derive both Teff and chemical composition. Finally, the range of spatial velocity estimated for this object makes it a likely member of the halo or thick disk population.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) 2 0 0 2 g u A 7 2 1 v 9 7 4 8 0 2 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Discovery of a peculiar DQ white dwarf ⋆,⋆⋆ D. Carollo,1 S.T. Hodgkin,2 A. Spagna,1 R.L. Smart,1 M.G. Lattanzi,1 B.J. McLean,3 D.J. Pinfield4 1 INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, I-10025 Pino Torinese, Italy 2 Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit, Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK 3 Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 4 Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Birkenhead, CH41 1LD, UK Received 23 January 2002/Accepted 2 August 2002 Abstract. We report the discovery of a new carbon rich white dwarf that was identified during a proper motion survey for cool white dwarfs based on photographic material used for the construction of the Guide Star Catalog II. Its large proper motion (µ ≃ 0.48 arcsec/yr) and faint apparent magnitude (V ≃ 18.7) suggest a nearby object of low luminosity. A low-resolution spectrum taken with the William Herschel Telescope clearly shows strong C2 Deslandres-d'Azambuja and Swan bands, which identify the star as a DQ white dwarf. The strength of the Deslandres-d'Azambuja bands and the depression of the continuum in the Swan-band region are signs of enhanced carbon abundance for the given Teff . Comparison of our spectrophotometric data to published synthetic spectra suggests 6000 K < Teff < 8000 K, although further analysis with specialized synthetic models appear necessary to derive both Teff and chemical composition. Finally, the range of spatial velocity estimated for this object makes it a likely member of the halo or thick disk population. Key words. White dwarfs -- Stars: carbon -- Stars: kinematics -- Stars: individual(GSC2U J131147.2+292348) -- Astrometry -- Techniques: spectroscopic 1. Introduction Star GSC2U J131147.2+292348 was identified during a proper motion survey for cool halo white dwarfs (WDs) based on photographic material used for the construction of the Second Guide Star Catalogue (GSC-II) (see, e.g., Lasker et al. 1995, McLean et al. 2000). The object is lo- cated near the North Galactic Pole (NGP) at l ≃ 61◦, b ≃ 85◦, is fast moving (µ ≃ 0.48 arcsec yr−1), and faint (V ≃ 18.7), as expected for a low luminosity object in the solar neighborhood. An accurate check on the SIMBAD database revealed that the star is not in the NLTT cat- Send offprint requests to: Daniela Carollo e-mail: [email protected] ⋆ Based on observations made with the William Herschel Telescope operated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. ⋆⋆ Based on observations made with the Italian Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) operated on the island of La Palma by the Centro Galileo Galilei of the INAF (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica) at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. alogue (Luyten 1979) but, quite surprisingly, is listed as a quasar candidate (object OMHR 58793) by Moreau & Reboul (1995), who measured an UV excess but did not detect any proper motion. 2. Observations and Data Analysis 2.1. Astrometry and photometry Our material consists of Schmidt plates from the Northern photographic surveys (POSS-I, Quick V and POSS-II) carried out at the Palomar Observatory (see Table 1). All plates were digitized at STScI utilizing modified PDS-type scanning machines with 25 µm square pixels (1.7 ′′/pixel) for the first epoch plates, and 15 µm pixels (1 ′′/pixel) for the second epoch plates (Laidler et al. 1996). These digital copies of the plates were initially analyzed by means of the standard software pipeline used for the construction of the GSC-II. The pipeline performs object detection and com- putes parameters and features for each identified object. Further, the software provides classification, position, and magnitude for each object by means of astrometric and photometric calibrations which utilized the Tycho2 (Høg 2 Carollo et al.: Discovery of a peculiar DQ star Table 1. GSC2 plate material used for the astrometry and the photographic photometry of the new DQ white dwarf. Field Center (J2000) Survey 13:04:14.7 +29:48:37 XJ443 POSS-II 13:04:15.2 +29:48:42 XP443 POSS-II XI443 POSS-II 13:04:20.7 +29:44:17 N322 Quick V 13:06:56.6 +29:13:25 13:06:55.5 +29:13:25 13:06:56.1 +29:13:24 POSS-I POSS-I XE322 XO322 Epoch 1995.234 1993.288 1991.299 1983.294 1955.288 1955.288 Pixel 15 µm 15 µm 15 µm 25 µm 25 µm 25 µm Color Emulsion + Filter BJ RF IN V12 E O IIIaJ + GG385 IIIaF + RG610 IV-N + RG9 IIaD+Wratten 12 103a-E + red plexiglass 103a-O unfiltered tion refers to the epoch of the most recent plate (XJ443), while the accurate proper motion was computed by combining the image locations of the star as measured on the 6 different plates of Table 1, which span ∼ 40 years. The photographic magnitudes are given in the natural photometric system of the POSS-II and Quick-V plates as defined by the emulsion-filter combinations in Table 1. In particular, the transformation between the photo- graphic and Johnson V is V12 = V − 0.15(B − V ) ac- cording to Russell et al. (1990). Also, recently acquired NIR images 1 provided the J, H, Ks magnitudes in Table 2. Finally, Moreau & Reboul (1995) published the values U ≃ 19.15 and V ≃ 19.10. Note that their visual mag- nitude is fairly consistent with our V12, considering the above color transformation and the errors of the photo- graphic photometry. 2.2. Spectroscopy Spectroscopy of GSC2U J131147.2+292348 was obtained on the night of 2001 January 29 using the intermediate dispersion spectrographic and imaging system (ISIS) on the 4.2-m William Herschel Telescope on the island of La Palma. The 5700 A dichroic was used to split the light and feed to the blue and red arms of the spectrograph. We used the R158B grating on the blue arm, which gave a nominal dispersion of 1.62 A/px and useful wave- length coverage from 3200 to 5700 A. (The dichroic cuts in at wavelengths > 5700 A, and at short wavelengths, the sensitivity falls off with the quantum efficiency of the detector). On the red arm, we used the R158R grating to give a nominal dispersion of 2.9 A/px covering from 5500 to 8000 A. A blocking filter (GG495) was also used on the red arm to cut out second order blue light. A 30-minute exposure was made using a 1-arcseconds slit. Subsequent exposures were taken of the spectrophotometric standards Feige 67 and Feige 34 to enable flux calibration of the pri- mary target. We took arc lamp exposures to enable wave- length calibration and tungsten lamp exposures for the pixel-to-pixel sensitivity variation and enable flat fielding. The data were reduced within the IRAF environment, following standard procedures. No attempt was made to correct for extinction, both standards and targets were measured with an airmass ≤ 1.1. Observations were made with a slit width of 1.02 arcseconds, which corresponds to 1 Taken with the NICS camera on the 3.6-m TNG telescope on La Palma Fig. 1. First epoch (POSS-I, XE322) and second epoch (POSS-II, XP443) plates in the direction of the newly dis- covered WD, the encircled star near the field center. The large relative motion of the object is evident. et al. 2000) and the GSPC-2 (Bucciarelli et al. 2001) as reference catalogs. Accuracies better than 0.1-0.2 arcsec in position and 0.15-0.2 mag in magnitude are generally attained. Star GSC2U J131147.2+292348 was part of the sam- ple of WD candidates discovered after screening the high proper motion stars found in survey field 443 (Table 1). These were selected on the basis of their relative proper motions as derived by applying the procedure described in Spagna et al. (1996) to just the POSS-II plates, spanning ∼ 4 years. The finding charts in Figure 1 show the high proper motion of this object. The of GSC2U J131147.2+292348 are given in Table 2. The posi- photometry astrometry and Table 2. Astrometry and photometry of GSC2U J131147.2+292348. The position was determined from plate XJ443 (epoch 1995.234, equinox J2000), while all of the available plates were used for the proper motions. The error of the photographic photometry is better than 0.2 mag (1σ). α (h m s) (J2000) δ (d m s) (J2000) µα cos δ (arcsec/yr) 13 11 47.21 +29 23 48.0 −0.382 ± 0.002 µδ (arcsec/yr) 0.286 ± 0.005 BJ 19.6 V12 18.7 RF 18.1 IN 17.5 J H Ks 17.48 ± 0.05 17.13 ± 0.10 17.08 ± 0.12 Carollo et al.: Discovery of a peculiar DQ star 3 4 detector pixels in the blue, i.e. a dispersion of 6.5 A per resolution element. For the red arm, the pixel scale is 0.36 arcseconds per pixel, leading to a resolution element of size 3 pixels, i.e. a resolution of 8.2 A. The blue and red arm spectra have been gaussian smoothed at these resolutions. Good agreement between the red and blue arm spectra was found in the overlap region, with fluxes agreeing to better than 10% in the range 5600-5700 A. 3. On the nature of GSC2U J131147.2+292348 of spectrum flux-calibrated GSC2U The J131147.2+292348 is shown in Figure 2. The signal- to-noise is around 10 for the whole spectrum, increasing slightly to the red. This noise level is clearly visible in the spectrum, and limits our ability to detect weak features. The crosses in Figure 2 represent the fluxes at differ- ent effective wavelengths as derived from the BJ , V12, RF , and IN photographic magnitudes in Tab. 2. The ul- traviolet flux was derived from the photographic U magni- tude of Moreau et al. (1995). The agreement appears rea- sonably consistent with the 10% and 20% accuracy levels of the flux-calibrated spectroscopy and the photographic photometry, respectively. The spectrum appears dominated by strong absorp- tion bands due to C2 molecules. The four Swan bands with bandheads at λ = 4382, 4737, 5165, and 5636 A are clearly identified, along with the less common Swan band at 6191 A. In addition, strong Deslandres and d'Azambuja (D-d'A) absorption bands are also present in the blue part of the spectrum at 3600, 3852, and 4102 A. These bands have been observed in the spectra of WDs with carbon rich atmospheres (DQ WDs) and temperatures2 above 6500 K. Finally, the spectrum in Figure 2 shows an evident depres- sion of the continuum in the Swan band region between 4500 and 6200 A. The spectral energy distribution (SED) of DQ stars changes with Teff and carbon abundance as shown by the model atmosphere spectra presented in Koester et al. (1982) and Wegner & Yackovich (1984). Figure 5 of Wegner & Yackovich gives and indication on what to ex- pect for different combinations of Teff and C:He abun- dance. Swan bands are generally present, while D-d'A bands start to become visible in models with C:He>∼ 10−6 at Teff ≃ 6600 K and with C:He >∼ 10−2 at Teff ≃ 10 000 K. A SED with C2 bands similar in strength to those ob- served in our spectrum requires a much enhanced C:He ratio for the given Teff. This can be seen by comparing the models in Figure 5 of Wegner & Yackovich with those in their Figures 2 and 3. At temperatures between 6000 K and 7000 K, deep absorption bands are produced with C:He ≈ 10−4. At Teff = 8000 K, carbon abundance has to increase to a rather extreme value, C:He=0.9, for the 2 This temperature seems to be the lower limit for DQ stars, and might be associated with the transition of C2 into C2H molecules (Bergeron et al. 2001). simultaneous presence of strong D-d'A and Swan bands in the synthetic SED (bottom panel of Figure 3 of Wegner & Yackovich). This model bears the most resemblance with the spectrum of our WD, however, it does not show any evidence of the continuum depression seen in the observed spectrum. Theoretical evidence that such depression of the continuum emission could occur is provided in Koester et al. (1982). Their Figure 1 displays theoretical C2 spec- tra at Teff = 8000 K and increasingly higher C:He ratios. The effect is to boost band strengths, thus depressing the continuum in the Swan-band region. Although the models with Teff = 8000 K just exam- ined seem consistent with the appearance of the C2 band systems observed in the spectrum of our WD, the relative flux at blue wavelengths (below ∼ 4100 A) is probably too high compared to the observed SED in Figure 2. In this regard, an attempt to find a black body compatible with the observed spectrum at λ > 7000 A, the NIR fluxes from our JHKs magnitudes, and with the blue peaks in the D-d'A region, resulted in a black-body temperature of ∼ 6000 K. (Note that in this case the depressed continuum occurs in the region of maximum black-body emission.) From the discussion above, it is evident that much is still to be learned about the properties of this new DQ star, and the reliable determination of its temperature and chemical composition must await more detailed at- mosphere models. Also, improved spectral coverage in the UV, below 3500 A, would probably be of help in better constraining model calculations. Finally, an approximate photometric parallax for GSCU J131147.2+292348 was estimated from the abso- lute magnitudes of theoretical models of non-DA stars. From the values in Tables 2 and 4 of Bergeron et al. (1995) for pure helium atmosphere WDs and averaging the distance moduli computed for the IJHKs bands (which are not affected by the strong C2 absorption bands) we estimate the distances d ≈ 70, 80, and 90 parsecs for Teff = 6000 K, 7000 K, and 8000 K, respectively. This distance interval corresponds to a range of tan- gential velocity Vtan = 4.74 · µ d ≃ 160-200 km s−1 and galactic components3 with respect to the LSR from (U, V ) ≃ (−148.1, +9.6) to (U, V ) ≃ (−193.3, +10.8) km s−1, for d = 70 pc and 90 pc, respectively. These rela- tively high values are not consistent (3σ) with the velocity distribution of the thin disk, while they are consistent with the kinematics of the halo or thick disk stellar population4. 3 Assuming a solar motion of U⊙ = 10.00 km s−1 and V⊙ = 5.25 km s−1, as from Dehnen & Binney (1998). The (U,V) com- ponents are computed from µα cos δ, µδ only. However, given the high galactic latitude of this star (b ≃ 85◦), the unknown Vr component would contribute less than 4% and 7.6% to the U and V values, respectively. 4 Here, we have the adopted ellipsoids (σU , σV , σW ; va) = (34, 21, 18; 6) km s−1 and (61, 58, 39; 36) km s−1 for the thin and thick disk respectively (Table 10.4 of Binney & Merrifield 1998). The halo ellipsoid (σU , σV , σW ; va) = (160, 89, 94; 217) km s−1 from Casertano, Ratnatunga & Bahcall (1990). Note that these velocity is 4 Carollo et al.: Discovery of a peculiar DQ star Fig. 2. The WHT optical spectrum of GSC2U J131147.2+292348. Vertical marks indicate the locations of the strong C2 Deslandres-d'Azambuja and Swan bands, and of the telluric O2. The crosses refer to the fluxes (with ±20% error bars) derived from the BJ , V12, RF , IN photographic photometry of Table 2 and the U mag from Moreau and Reboul (1995). 4. Conclusions We have discovered a new carbon rich white dwarf (DQ), which shows very strong C2 Deslandres-d'Azambuja and Swan bands. To the best of our knowledge, no other object is known today which such a strong simultaneous evidence of the two molecular band systems associated with C2. Comparisons to published synthetic spectra suggest 6000 < Teff < 8000 K, while a black-body fit to the observed fluxes at λ > 7000 A, and to the peaks be- low ∼ 4100 A supports the possibility that TBB ∼ 6000 K. Therefore, it is evident that the reliable determi- nation of temperature and chemical composition of GSCU J131147.2+292348 must await more detailed atmosphere model calculations. Anyhow, it is likely that the carbon abundance in the atmosphere of this WD is significantly enhanced compared to other known DQ stars of similar temperature. A photometric distance of 70-90 parsecs has been esti- mated, which implies a relatively large spatial velocity and makes this new DQ white dwarf a likely member of the halo or thick disk population. Of course, a direct determi- nation of the distance will be the only way to derive model independent absolute magnitude and kinematics for this object. Acknowledgements. We are indebted to the referee, U. Heber, for his valuable comments and suggestions that were essential for the proper interpretation of our observations. The constant support of our GSC2 collaborators B. Bucciarelli, J. Garcia, V. Laidler, C. Loomis, and R. Morbidelli is acknowledged. And thanks go also to A. Boden and R. Cutri who repro- cessed their 2MASS frames to look for this object. The GSC II is a joint project of the Space Telescope Science Institute and the Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino. Space Telescope kinematics parameters are still not well established. In partic- ular the estimated (U,V) components would result consistent with the halo kinematics, but only marginally with the thick disk parameters, recently derived by Chiba and Beers (2000). Science Institute is operated by AURA for NASA under con- tract NAS5-26555. Current participation of the Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino is supported by the Italian National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF). Partial financial support to this research comes from the Italian CNAA and the Italian Ministry of Research (MIUR) through the COFIN-2001 pro- gram. STH and DJP acknowledge the financial support of the Particle Physics and Astronomy Reasearch Council of the United Kingdom. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg (France). References Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F., Beauchamp, A. 1995, PASP, 107, 1047 Bergeron, P., Leggett, S.K., Ruiz, M.T. 2001, ApJ SS, 133, 413 Binney, J. & Merrifield, M. 1998, Galactic Astronomy, Princeton Univ. Press Bucciarelli, B., Garc´ıa Yus, J., Casalegno, R., Postman, M., Lasker, B. M., Sturch, C., Lattanzi, M.G., McLean, B.J., et al. 2001, A&A, 368, 335 Casertano, S., Ratnatunga, K.U., Bahcall, J.N. 1990, ApJ, 357, 435 Chiba, M., Beers, T.C. 2000, AJ, 119, 2843 Dehnen, W., Binney, J.J. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 387 Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V.V., Urban, S., et al. 2000, A&A 355, 27 Koester, D., Weidemann, V. & Zeidler-K.T., E.M. 1982, A&A 116, 147 Laidler, V.G., Sturch, C.R., Greene, G.R., Lasker, B.M., et al. 1996, BAAS, 188, 54.21 Lasker B.M., McLean B.J., Jenkner H., Lattanzi, M.G., Spagna A. 1995, Future Possibilities for Astrometry in Space, Cambridge (England, UK), Jun 19-21, 1995, Perryman M.A.C., van Leeuwen F. & Guyenne T.-D. eds., ESA SP- 379, 137-141 Luyten, W.J. 1979, NLTT, Minneapolis, Univ. of Minnesota McLean B.J., Greene G.R., Lattanzi M.G., Pirenne B., 2000, ADASS IX, Kohala Coast (HI, USA), Oct 3-6, 1999, Manset N., Veillet C. & Crabtree D. eds., ASP Conf. Ser., 216, 145-148 Moreau, O., Reboul H. 1995, A&A SS, 111, 169 Carollo et al.: Discovery of a peculiar DQ star 5 Russell, J.L., Lasker, B.M., Sturch, C.R. & Jenkner H. 1990, AJ, 99, 2059 Spagna, A., Lattanzi, M. G., Lasker, B. M., McLean, B. J., Massone, G., Lanteri, L. 1996, A&A, 311, 758 Wegner, G. & Yackovich F.H. 1984, ApJ, 284, 257
astro-ph/0305161	1	0305	2003-05-09T18:49:54	Peculiar spectral and power spectral behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present results of an analysis of all 480 ks of Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer Proportional Counter Array data obtained from 17 May 1998 to 11 October 1998 on the luminous low mass X-ray binary GX 13+1. We analysed the spectral properties in colour-colour diagrams (CDs) and hardness-intensity diagrams (HIDs) and fitted the power spectra with a multi-Lorentzian model. GX 13+1 traces out a curved track in the CDs on a time scale of hours, which is very reminiscent of a standard atoll track containing an island, and lower and upper banana branch. However, both count rate and power spectral properties vary along this track in a very unusual way, not seen in any other atoll or Z source. The count rate, which varied by a factor of ~1.6, along a given track first decreases and then increases, causing the motion through the HIDs to be in the opposite sense to that in the CD, contrary to all other Z and atoll sources. Along a CD track, the very low frequency noise uniquely decreases in amplitude from ~5 to ~2% (rms). The high frequency noise amplitude decreases from ~4% to less than 1% and its characteristic frequency decreases from ~10 to \~5 Hz. The 57-69 Hz quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) found earlier is also detected, and no kHz QPOs are found. In addition the entire track shows secular motion on a time scale of about a week. The average count rate as well as the amplitude of the very low frequency noise correlate with this secular motion. We discuss a possible explanation for the peculiar properties of GX 13+1 in terms of an unusual orientation or strength of a relativistic jet.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. (DOI: will be inserted by hand later) November 16, 2018 Peculiar spectral and power spectral behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 R. S. Schnerr1, T. Reerink1, M. van der Klis1, J. Homan1 , 2, M. M´endez1 , 3, R. P. Fender1, and E. Kuulkers4 1 Astronomical Institute "Anton Pannekoek", University of Amsterdam, and Center for High Energy Astrophysics, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy 3 SRON, National Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands 4 ESA-ESTEC, Science Operations & Data Systems Division, SCI-SDG, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands Received 10 Dec 2002 / Accepted 06 May 2003 Abstract. We present results of an analysis of all 480 ks of Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer Proportional Counter Array data obtained from 17 May 1998 to 11 October 1998 on the luminous low mass X-ray binary GX 13+1. We analysed the spectral properties in colour-colour diagrams (CDs) and hardness-intensity diagrams (HIDs) and fitted the power spectra with a multi- Lorentzian model. GX 13+1 traces out a curved track in the CDs on a time scale of hours, which is very reminiscent of a standard atoll track containing an island, and lower and upper banana branch. However, both count rate and power spectral properties vary along this track in a very unusual way, not seen in any other atoll or Z source. The count rate, which varied by a factor of ∼1.6, along a given track first decreases and then increases, causing the motion through the HIDs to be in the opposite sense to that in the CD, contrary to all other Z and atoll sources. Along a CD track, the very low frequency noise uniquely decreases in amplitude from ∼5 to ∼2% (rms). The high frequency noise amplitude decreases from ∼4% to less than 1% and its characteristic frequency decreases from ∼10 to ∼5 Hz. The 57-69 Hz quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) found earlier is also detected, and no kHz QPOs are found. In addition the entire track shows secular motion on a time scale of about a week. The average count rate as well as the amplitude of the very low frequency noise correlate with this secular motion. We discuss a possible explanation for the peculiar properties of GX 13+1 in terms of an unusual orientation or strength of a relativistic jet. Key words. accretion, accretion disks -- stars: individual: GX 13+1 -- stars: neutron -- binaries: close -- X-rays: binaries 1. Introduction Low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) containing a neutron star can be divided into two subclasses, atoll and Z sources, based on their correlated X-ray timing and spectral properties (Hasinger & van der Klis 1989). In the colour-colour diagram (CD) LMXBs tend to trace out a well-defined, fully connected 1-dimensional track on a time scale of hours to days for Z sources and days to weeks for atoll sources. Z sources trace out a Z-shaped track in the CD, where the three branches of the Z from top left to bottom right are called the horizontal branch (HB), the normal branch (NB) and the flaring branch (FB). The (sharp) turns in the track separat- ing these branches are called vertices. The power spectral fea- tures found in Z sources are very low frequency noise (VLFN), which has an approximately power law shape and is observed up to a few Hz, a band limited noise (BLN) component with a characteristic frequency of 2 to 20 Hz and various differ- ent quasi periodic oscillations (QPOs) with a Lorentzian shape to: Send [email protected] requests offprint R. S. Schnerr, e-mail: and frequencies that range from a few Hz to more than a kHz (van der Klis 1995; van der Klis 2000). These power spectral features occur correlated to the posi- tion of the source in the Z track (see Fig. 1). QPOs with fre- quencies of 13-55 Hz are found on the HB (HBOs), and with frequencies of 4-7 Hz on the NB (NBOs); in some sources the latter continue onto the FB where the frequency increases up to ∼20 Hz. BLN with a fractional root-mean-square amplitude (rms) of up to ∼8% is found along the HB and disappears as the source moves onto the NB. There is a strong tendency of the amplitude of the VLFN to increase from less then 1% to ∼10% along the whole track from the HB to the FB. The flux increases from left to right along the HB, stays approximately constant or slightly decreases along the NB, and usually in- creases again on the FB. The mass accretion rate ( M) is thought to increase along the HB via the NB to the FB on time scales of hours to days (Hasinger & van der Klis 1989), although on longer time scales the relation with M may be more compli- cated (e.g. Kuulkers et al. 1994; Homan et al. 2002). Atoll sources trace out a track that generally has a C or U-shape, consisting of an island branch, which often takes the shape of one or more isolated patches because of observational 2 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 HB NB FB IS LB UB HB NB FB LFN HBO H F N NBO IS HFN Q P O ? LB UB HFN VLFN VLFN Fig. 1. Typical CDs (top) of Z (left) and atoll (right) sources, and power spectra (bottom) corresponding to their different branches in the CD. The power spectra of the HB and the island state (IS) were shifted upwards by a factor of 104 and those of the NB and lower banana (LB) by a factor of 102. The figure was taken from Wijnands (2001). windowing (usually in the upper left region of the CD), and a banana branch (extending from the lower banana (LB) -- lower left -- to the upper banana (UB) -- upper right). VLFN, BLN and QPOs similar to those in Z sources also occur in atoll sources (see Fig. 1; Wijnands 2001). Along an atoll-source track from the island to the lower, middle and then to the upper banana, the rms amplitude of the VLFN increases from ∼2 to 5%, the characteristic frequency of the BLN, which sometimes consists of several components (van Straaten et al. 2002), first increases and then decreases within a range of ∼2 to ∼70 Hz, and its rms decreases from ∼20% to less than 1%. The count rate in- creases by a factor of ∼2-10 (Hasinger & van der Klis 1989) going from the island state to the banana state (except for the transient sources, see below). The frequencies of the various QPOs increase in the same sense along the track in Z and atoll sources. GX 13+1 is a LMXB containing a neutron star, since X-ray bursts have been found from this source (Fleischman 1985; Matsuba et al. 1995). Together with GX 3+1, GX 9+1 and GX 9+9, GX 13+1 forms the subclass of persistently bright atoll-sources (the "GX atoll sources") which were ob- served to be in the banana state by Hasinger & van der Klis (1989). In GX 13+1 and GX 3+1, two branched structures have been observed in the CD and hardness-intensity dia- gram (HID) (Stella et al. 1985; Lewin et al. 1987; Schulz et al. 1989; Homan et al. 1998; Muno et al. 2002). In luminos- ity, these sources are intermediate between the very lu- minous Z sources and the weaker remaining atoll sources (Ford et al. 2000). Contrary to the other atoll sources and the Z sources, these GX atoll sources have so far not shown kHz QPOs. Although GX 13+1 has been classified as an atoll source based on upper-banana branch phenomenology (Hasinger & van der Klis 1989), among the atoll sources it is the source that shows X-ray properties closest to those of the Z sources (VLFN amplitude: Hasinger & van der Klis 1989, CD track: Muno et al. 2002, ∼65 Hz QPOs: Homan et al. 1998). The radio luminosity of GX 13+1 is similar to that of the Z sources, whereas the other atoll sources are weaker (Garcia et al. 1988; Fender & Hendry 2000). From infra-red spectroscopy Bandyopadhyay et al. (1999) conclude GX 13+1 might be a Z source, based on the nature of its companion sug- gesting a long orbital period. High resolution spectroscopic observations of GX 13+1 with ASCA (Ueda et al. 2001) and XMM-Newton (Sidoli et al. R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 3 2002), have revealed the presence of narrow absorption lines, similar to those in the strong galactic jet sources GRS 1915+105 and GRO J1655-40 and the dippers MXB 1659-29 and X 1624-49. For some Z sources it is known that the position of the track they trace out in the CD drifts on a time scale of weeks, with shifts in the colours of up to ∼10% (Kuulkers et al. 1994; Kuulkers et al. 1996); this effect is called secular motion. It is also seen in the atoll source 4U 1636-53 (Prins & van der Klis 1997; Di Salvo et al. 2003), but in the CD it is not as strong as in some Z-sources. In GX 13+1, Muno et al. (2002) also detected secular motion (see also Homan et al. 1998). These shifts are usually larger in the HIDs compared to the CDs due to the shift of the track being strongly correlated with X-ray luminosity (Lx). The power spectral properties of all LMXBs seem to depend primarily on the position (S, Hasinger et al. 1990) of the source in the atoll or Z track and not on Lx. Lx shows a strong correlation (usually positive, sometimes nega- tive) with this S on short time scales (hours to days), but this correlation can be completely absent on long time scales. It has long been assumed that this is because S is a measure of the accretion rate M, with Lx not proportional to M due to uncer- tain causes such as, e.g., beaming, but more recently a scenario has been suggested in which the inner radius of the accretion disc (rinner) determines the power spectral properties, while at the same time Lx is determined by the total mass accretion plus perhaps nuclear burning (van der Klis 2001). The decorrelation of Lx from the power spectral properties occurs in this scenario through energy release that does not originate from accretion through the inner disc, but does respond to inner disc count rate changes in a time-averaged sense. Recently, Muno et al. (2002) and Gierli´nski & Done (2002) suggested that the distinction between atoll and Z sources might be an artifact of incomplete sampling, because the atoll sources that cover a wide enough range in count rate (the tran- sient sources Aql X-1, 4U 1608-52 and 4U 1705-44, each with a flux range of more than a factor of 10, see also Barret & Olive 2002) also exhibit roughly Z-shaped tracks with at the low- est luminosities a 'horizontal branch'. However, the differ- ences in flux ranges and time scales on which these tracks are traced out in the CDs (as also noted by Muno et al. 2002) as well as their topology and power spectral behaviour (van Straaten et al. 2003), argue against any simple unification of these two classes. Being a persistently bright source with a flux range of a factor of ∼2, GX 13+1 is not among the sources that has been observed to show such an atoll source 'horizontal branch'. In this paper we discuss the X-ray colour, flux and tim- ing properties of GX 13+1 and their mutual dependence. We find highly unusual power spectral -- colour-colour diagram be- haviour, which does not fit in with either Z or atoll behaviour as well as very unusual secular motion. In Sect. 4.4 we suggest a possible explanation for the unusual properties we find in GX 13+1. 2. Observations We used all publicly available Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE, Bradt et al. 1993) Proportional Counter Array (PCA, Jahoda et al. 1996) data of GX 13+1 in the third RXTE gain epoch, a total of 44 observations (listed in Table 1) ranging from May 17 to October 10, 1998 and lasting about 480 ksec in total. Individual observations typically last ∼10 ksec, in- terrupted several times by South Atlantic Anomaly passages and Earth occultations. The uninterrupted parts of observations are normally ∼3 ksec in duration. In 33 observations the five Proportional Counter Units (PCUs) 0 -- 4 were all active, but in 11 observations PCU 3 and/or 4 were inactive for part or for the entire observation. The 2-60 keV count rate for 5 PCUs varied between ∼3300 -- 5500 cnts s−1. For all observations Standard 2 data are available which have a time resolution of 16 s in 129 energy channels (covering the 2-60 keV PCA range), as well as high time resolution Single Bit and Event data with a time res- olution of 1/4096 s or better, also covering the 2-60 keV PCA range. Standard 2 data of PCUs 0, 1 and 2 (which were always ac- tive) were used to create CDs and HIDs with 16 s data points. The data were background corrected using the Bright Source Model for the RXTE PCA1. The soft colour (SC) was defined as the count rate ratio between PCA Standard 2 spectral chan- nels 7-14 and 3-6 (3.6-6.5 and 2.2-3.6 keV respectively) and the hard colour (HC) as the ratio between channels 21-40 and 15-20 (8.7-16.0 and 6.5-8.7 keV). The intensity was taken to be the 2-60 keV (channel 1-129) count rate. We checked the colours for instrumental drifts caused by changes in the response of the RXTE PCA by analysing 4 Crab observations covering the entire observation period of the data we used. We created CDs of the Crab observations using the same bands as we used for the GX 13+1 data and calculated the average colours. The shifts of Crab in the CD are below 1% in SC and below 0.5% in HC. Dead time effects result in shifts of the data points in the CD relative to one another of less than ∼0.1% in both HC and SC. Both the effect of instrumental drifts and of dead time are negligible compared to the effects reported below. 3. Analysis and results 3.1. The colour-colour and hardness-intensity diagrams On cursory examination, the CD of our data appears to exhibit the lower part of an atoll track or perhaps the NB/FB part of a Z track, traced out on a time scale of hours to days (Fig. 2) with a rather sharp vertex. This track shifts on longer time scales, re- sulting in a CD with overlapping tracks. Similar shifts are also observed in the HIDs. We divided the data into 15 different tracks by adding observations together in chronological order for at most one week, unless the track shifted before then (see Table 1). A shift in this context was defined as motion of the track over a colour-colour interval more or less perpendicular to the track, significant compared to the track width. Clearly, 1 http://rxte.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xte/whatsnew/calibration.html 4 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 2 6 1 5 8 9 4 7 12 3 10a 10b 10c 11a 11b l r u o o C d r a H Soft Colour Soft Colour Fig. 2. The colour-colour diagrams of tracks 1 to 12 (black points); the tracks that show a vertex are plotted in the left plot and those that do not in the right. For comparison the colour-colour diagram of track 6 is plotted (grey points) in every frame. Notice the shifts of the track, mainly in the hard colour. For each point we used a 16 s average spectrum to calculate the SC (3.6-6.5 keV/2.2-3.6 keV) and HC (8.7-16.0 keV/6.5-8.7 keV). Typical errors are 0.04 (top left of the CD) up to 0.06 (top right of the CD) in the SC and around 0.013 in the HC. In Fig. 2 we show the CDs of all 15 tracks in black su- perimposed on track 6 (in grey) for reference. As mentioned above GX 13+1 shows a pattern very reminiscent of a stan- dard atoll track, with, however, a rather sharp vertex. The tracks are shifted relative to each other; the vertex locations are presented in Fig. 4 and Table 1. The shifts are consistent (χ2/dof = 8.3/7) with being on a diagonal line in the CD. a shift parallel to the tracks can be overlooked in this way. For that reason data from our 15 tracks could still be to some extent mixed up. However, it is not likely that this happened very of- ten. The reason for this is, that, as shown below, the shifts tend to occur along one particular diagonal in the CD. The tracks do not usually run parallel to that diagonal. Tracks 3, 10a,b,c and 11a,b were excluded from further analysis, because they do not show a vertex. Because of this lack of a vertex we cannot with confidence compare the posi- tions of these tracks in the CD with those of the others. For each of the remaining 9 tracks we defined a parameter Sa that indicates the position along the track, in a similar way as e.g. Dieters & van der Klis (2000) for the Z source Sco X-1. This was done by approximating the track with a spline onto which the data points are projected along a vector defined by their errors in HC and SC (see Fig. 3). Different from e.g Sco X-1, GX 13+1 only shows one vertex in the CDs instead of two. We chose the value of Sa at this vertex to be equal to 2, and fixed the arc length along the track by setting Sa =1 at a point on the top branch at a fixed HC and SC interval (∆HC=0.3, ∆SC=0.2) above and to the right of the vertex. The locations of the vertices (the middle of the sharp turn) were estimated by eye. To quantify the shift of each track in the CD we defined a parameter Sshift as the distance of the track's vertex to the point HC=0.46 and SC=3.07 (the vertex of track 1): Sshift ≡ p(∆HC 2 + ∆SC 2). R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 5 aS =1 C H S =2a SC Fig. 3. The CD of track 6 and the spline used to calculate Sa. The locations on the curve where Sa = 1 and Sa = 2 are indicated; the arrow indicates the direction of increasing Sa. 9 5 4 2 6 7 12 1 8 Fig. 4. The vertex locations of the tracks with their track num- ber and the best linear fit to the points. The vertices are con- sistent with being on a line of increasing hard and soft colour (χ2/dof = 8.3/7), spanning a 7% increase in SC and a 43% increase in HC. Representative HIDs of track 1 are shown in Fig. 5, together with the CD. The colour-colour points have different symbols based on their location in the CD to simplify tracking the differ- ences in the shape of the track between the diagrams. Contrary to what is seen in other sources the track is flipped in the HIDs compared to the CD. 3.2. Dependence of the count rate on Sa and Sshift In Fig. 6 we show the 2-60 keV count rate plotted ver- sus Sa for each track. Contrary to what is normally seen in atoll sources on these timescales (Hasinger & van der Klis 1989; Di Salvo et al. 2001, 2003), the count rate depends non- monotonically on Sa, with usually a minimum somewhere in the range Sa=2 -- 3.4. Such a minimum is seen at the NB-FB ver- tex (Sa=2) in some Z sources (see, e.g, Dieters & van der Klis 2000; Jonker et al. 2000; Homan et al. 2002), but there the min- imum always occurs at the vertex, while in GX 13+1 its po- sition drifts between Sa values of 2 and 3 depending on ob- servation. In Fig. 7 we have plotted the average count rate for Sa = 2.1 ± 0.1 versus Sshift. From Figs. 6 and 7 a correla- tion between count rate and Sshift is observable: the two tracks with the lowest Sshift, tracks 1 and 8, have lower count rates for a given Sa than the other tracks, except for the lowest three Sa intervals of track 1. Tracks 9 and 5 which have the highest Sshift show the highest count rates above Sa ∼ 2.5. 3.3. The power spectra Power spectra with a Nyquist frequency of 2048 Hz were cal- culated using 16 s segments of high time resolution data and all energy channels, i.e., covering the 2-60 keV PCA band. Each of the 9 tracks separately was divided into (typically 8) Sa intervals and the power spectra corresponding to the se- lected colour-colour points were averaged. A constant Poisson level determined by using the 1024 to 2048 Hz range (where no kHz QPOs were detected) was subtracted. Three representative power spectra from track 7 are presented in power×frequency vs. frequency representation in Fig. 8. The VLFN, BLN and a QPO are clearly visible. The power spectra were fitted with 2 -- 4 Lorentzians. We chose to fit the VLFN with two zero-centered Lorentzians in- stead of a power law, because it has a "bumpy" structure, which can not be fitted well with a single power law (to obtain a good fit one has to add additional components to fit the bumps in any case) and is too broad a feature to be well fitted by a sin- gle Lorentzian. We will call these two components the low and high VLFN. This approach has the additional advantage that it avoids the common problem that the VLFN power law attempts to also fit power at high frequencies, which is probably unre- lated to the VLFN, and can bias the power law to ill represent the data at low frequencies. Two more Lorentzians fit the BLN and a QPO, when present. The Lorentzians are reported in the νmax, Q, r representation used by Belloni et al. (2002), where νmax is the frequency at which the Lorentzian reaches its max- imum in a power×frequency vs. frequency power spectral rep- resentation, Q the quality factor (for which we use the standard 6 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 Fig. 5. The colour-colour diagram and hardness-intensity diagrams of track 1. The colour-colour points have different symbols based on their location in the CD to simplify tracking the differences in the shape of the track. The count rates are for 5 PCUs. Typical error bars are shown for two points at the ends of the track in the different diagrams. definition of centroid frequency divided by full width at half maximum) and r the fractional rms amplitude. We will regard νmax to be the characteristic frequency of a Lorentzian com- ponent. The rms powers were calculated in the 0 -- ∞ Hz range, except for the two components fitting the VLFN where we used the 0.125 -- ∞ Hz range because for these components the un- measured power below our lowest Fourier frequency provides a significant contribution (which is not the case for the other components). The rms amplitudes were calculated assuming an average background of 140 cnts s−1 (2-60 keV, 5 PCUs); the ∼20 cnts s−1 deviations from this average are negligible in view of the high source count rates. In all of the tracks we have found VLFN and BLN and in 5 of the 9 tracks we detected the 57-69 Hz QPO first reported by Homan et al. (1998). For all Sa intervals we found VLFN; the BLN usually disappeared in the highest Sa intervals and QPOs were only detected in the lowest Sa intervals. The power spectral components and their dependence on Sa and Sshift is discussed in more detail in Sect. 3.4. 3.4. Dependence of the power spectral properties on Sa and Sshift 3.4.1. The very low frequency noise As described in Sect. 3.3, the VLFN was fitted with two zero-centered (Q = 0) Lorentzians. The power of both these Lorentzians was added to calculate the total rms amplitude of the VLFN. For all 9 tracks the rms of the total VLFN generally decreases with Sa (see Fig. 9), from ∼4.5 -- 5.5% to ∼3 -- 3.5%. An anti-correlation with Sshift is visible: tracks 5 and 9, which have a high Sshift, have a VLFN rms that is significantly lower than that of the other tracks. To quantify this we fitted a straight line to the VLFN amplitude - Sa relation, and determined the value of the VLFN amplitude at Sa = 2 from this fit. In Fig. 10 we show this amplitude as a function of Sshift. As Sshift increases from 0 to ∼0.3 the VLFN rms at Sa = 2 decreases from ∼4.8% to ∼3%. The absolute rms of the VLFN as a function of Sa of all tracks combined is shown in Fig. 11. Up to Sa = 2 the absolute rms decreases from ∼50 to 30 cnts s−1, and for Sa > 2 it stays approximately constant at ∼30 cnts s−1. So for Sa < 2 the decreasing absolute rms is correlated to the decreasing count rate; however, for Sa > 2 the count rate in some tracks increases, but this does not affect the absolute rms, which stays approximately constant. The characteristic frequency (νmax) of the low and high VLFN does not show a clear correlation with Sa, but varies between 0.1 -- 0.3 Hz for the low and between 0.5 -- 1.5 Hz for the high VLFN (with a few exceptions up to 2 Hz when no BLN was fitted, and for low Sa in track 9 where the BLN also shows an extremely high νmax). 3.4.2. The band limited noise The BLN characteristic frequency, shown in Fig. 12, and rms, shown in Fig. 13, both decrease with Sa. For most tracks the frequencies decrease from ∼10 to ∼4 -- 5 Hz, except for track 9 which has a BLN frequency of ∼30 Hz for its lowest two Sa intervals (Sa ∼1.5 -- 1.7). The highest BLN rms is ∼4 -- 6% and is found for low Sa; when Sa increases the BLN rms decreases until it becomes undetectable around Sa ∼2.5 -- 3. Typical 95% confidence upper limits for the BLN for the Sa intervals where it was not detected are ∼2%, with νmax = 5 Hz and Q = 0.5. For tracks 9 and 4 the rms increases again with Sa above Sa ∼ 3. The characteristics of the BLN do not show a clear corre- lation with Sshift, although the BLN in track 9 has a higher rms for a given Sa than in the other tracks and also shows ex- tremely high frequencies for low Sa (see above). The Q of the BLN is also not significantly correlated with Sa. It varies be- tween 0 and 1, with the exception of the last interval of track 2 (Sa = 3.13 ± 0.23, Q = 2.6+22.1 −1.7 ) and Sa interval 7 of track 9 (Sa = 2.94 ± 0.05, Q = 4+4 −2), where the BLN also shows a very high frequency of 12.1+0.7 −0.8 Hz; in these two cases (only) this component is sufficiently narrow to be called a QPO. R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 7 3.4.3. Quasi-periodic oscillations QPOs were detected with frequencies ranging from ∼60 -- 75 Hz and Q values of ∼2 -- 5 (detailed properties are shown in Table 2). They are only detected at low Sa values, with the highest rms at the lowest Sa, and in too small a range of Sa to say anything about the dependence of their frequency and Q on Sa. The fact that QPOs were detected in tracks 1 and 8 and not in tracks 5 and 9 could be related to the high Sshift values of tracks 5 and 9, but this could also be due to the fact that these tracks do not reach the upper-left most part of the track, where the QPOs are found. The frequencies of the detected QPOs are all consistent with being in the range of those previously found by Homan et al. (1998). We have searched for kHz QPOs up to 2048 Hz, but none were detected above the 3σ confidence level. The strongest nar- row features (Q ∼ 10) above 300 Hz were between 2 and 3σ and resulted in 3σ upper limits of up to 3% rms. A broad, 3.1σ, high frequency feature (2.6 ± 0.5 % rms, Q = 0.9+0.9 −0.6, νmax = 858+225 −137 Hz) is found in track 7 (Sa = 1.50 ± 0.08), but when the number of trials is taken into account this is not a significant detection. 8 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 =1 =12 =4 =6 =9 =8 =2 =7 =5 Fig. 6. The count rate vs Sa for all the 9 tracks, distributed over two plots for clarity. The track number and corresponding symbol are shown in the figure. For all tracks the count rate decreases up to Sa=2 -- 3.4 and in some tracks it increases again for Sa >2 -- 3.4. Fig. 7. The count rate at Sa = 2 for all 9 tracks plotted vs. Sshift. The two tracks with the lowest Sshift (tracks 1 and 8) show the lowest count rates. R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 9 low VLFN high VLFN QPO BLN Fig. 8. Representative power spectra of GX 13+1. Shown are power spectra of track 7 with an averaged Sa of 1.50 ± 0.08 (left; χ2/dof = 125/145), 2.01 ± 0.06 (middle; χ2/dof = 135/148) and 2.73±0.12 (right; χ2/dof = 138/151). All power spectral features become weaker with increasing Sa. The solid line represents the fit and the dashed and dotted lines the Lorentzian components. The VLFN is fitted by the long dashed line (low VLFN) and the dotted line (high VLFN), the BLN by the dash- single dot line and the QPO by the dash-triple dot line. In the left power spectrum some excess power is present in the 200-2000 Hz range, but no significant kHz QPO is detected. Fig. 9. VLFN fractional rms amplitude vs Sa for all 9 tracks; the amplitude plotted is that of the combined low and high VLFN, integrated from 0.125 to ∞ Hz. For all tracks the amplitude of the VLFN generally decreases with Sa, and tracks 5 (five-pointed stars, right frame) and 9 (six-pointed stars, left frame), which have the highest Sshift, have the lowest amplitude for a given Sa. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 6. 10 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 Fig. 10. The VLFN amplitude at Sa=2 for all 9 tracks (as deter- mined from a linear fit to a plot of the VLFN rms vs. Sa), as a function of Sshift. The amplitude decreases from ∼4.8% to ∼3% as Sshift increases from 0 to ∼0.3. Fig. 11. The absolute amplitude of the VLFN as a function of Sa for all 9 tracks combined. Up to Sa=2 the absolute rms ampli- tude decreases from ∼50 to 30 cnts s−1, and for Sa >2 it stays approximately constant at ∼30 cnts s−1. R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 11 Fig. 12. The characteristic frequency of the BLN vs Sa for all 9 tracks. The characteristic frequency generally decreases with Sa. Track 9 shows an extremely high frequency for its lowest two Sa intervals. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 6; in some Sa intervals no BLN was detected. Fig. 13. The fractional rms amplitude of the BLN vs Sa for all 9 tracks. The amplitude of the BLN generally decreases with Sa for all tracks, but in track 4 (diamonds, left frame) and 9 (six-pointed stars, left frame) it increases again for the highest two Sa intervals. 3σ Upper limits were determined with Q = 0.5 and νmax = 5 Hz, and are represented by the points with only a a negative error bar extending to the bottom of the plot. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 6 12 4. Discussion R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 4.1. Extreme secular motion in CD and HIDs We have studied the secular motion both in the CD and in the HIDs of GX 13+1. The largest shifts are observed in the direc- tion of HC (∼40%) and not in SC (∼7%). In other atoll and Z sources which show secular motion, shifts of less than 3% in HC and ∼4% in SC (4U 1636-53, Di Salvo et al. 2003) and 6% in HC and 8% in SC (GX 5-1, Kuulkers et al. 1994) are observed; in Cyg X -- 2 the shifts in both HC and SC are up to ∼10% (Kuulkers et al. 1996). This is not strongly dependent on the choice of bands. The shifts in the CD of GX 13+1 are remarkably large, particularly in HC, even when compared to Z sources, where the shifts are larger than in atoll sources. As is also seen in other sources (references above), the shift of the track shows a correlation with average count rate resulting in shifted tracks in the HIDs. We find that in GX 13+1 the am- plitude of the VLFN also shows a correlation with this shift; it decreases when the track is shifted towards higher HC and SC. Such a correlation is not observed in the Z source GX 5- 1, but in the atoll source 4U 1636-53 the part of the track that shifted to higher SC and intensity also has a lower VLFN rms. The VLFN rms in Cyg X -- 2 shows the same dependence on the shift of the track, but the overall intensity level of a track decreases with this shift (Kuulkers et al. 1999). In GX 13+1, track 9, which has the largest shift also has unusual BLN prop- erties (Sect. 3.4.2); in 4U 1636-53 an extra, broad component (Q = 0.8) is detected next to the BLN in the high intensity part of the track at ∼ 1.1% rms, but not in the low intensity part (with 1σ upper limits of ∼0.6%). 4.2. The flipping effect In the HIDs with the HC or SC on the vertical, and count rate on the horizontal axis the arc-shape found in the CD is re- versed, i.e., the source moves through the arc in the opposite sense in the HIDs as compared to the CD. This is different from what is usually observed in atoll sources (Wijnands et al. 1999; van Straaten et al. 2000; Muno et al. 2002; Di Salvo et al. 2003), where, on short timescales, the same basic pattern is traced out in both the CD and the HIDs and the sense of mo- tion is always the same. On longer timescales secular shifts in the HIDs are sometimes observed (van Straaten et al. 2003). In most Z sources the observed basic pattern in the CD and HIDs is also similar (Schulz et al. 1989; Kuulkers & van der Klis 1996; Jonker et al. 2002; Homan et al. 2002), although for some sources the count rate decreases along (a part of) the FB, causing this branch to be in the opposite direction in the HIDs compared to the CD (Kuulkers et al. 1996). The cause for this unusual behaviour of GX 13+1 in the HIDs is that the count rate depends on Sa in a different way than in most other sources (see Sect. 3.2). A possible explanation for this will be discussed in Sect. 4.4. 4.3. GX 13+1 in the Z/atoll scheme The tracks that GX 13+1 traces out in the CD are, at first sight, very reminiscent of a classic island/banana in an atoll source, or a normal-branch/flaring-branch in a Z source. However, from the results presented in Sect. 3 we find that the power spectral properties of this source as a function of Sa resemble neither those of a classic atoll, nor of a Z source. In a given track the count rate of GX 13+1 decreases along the track up to Sa=2 -- 3 after which (in some tracks) it increases again with Sa, while in atoll sources on short timescales the count rate generally increases monotonically with Sa along the whole track (see Sect. 3.2; for references on atoll source behaviour see van Straaten et al. 2002; Di Salvo et al. 2003; Hasinger & van der Klis 1989). This is also different from what is observed in Z sources, where the count rate can slightly decrease along the NB, but increases immediately after the NB/FB vertex so that the minimum in count rate is at the ver- tex (see Sect. 3.2; for references on Z source behaviour see Dieters & van der Klis 2000; Jonker et al. 2000; O'Neill et al. 2001; Jonker et al. 2002; Homan et al. 2002). The VLFN of GX 13+1 is very strong (usually ∼4 -- 5.5% rms for Sa ≤2) compared to atoll sources in the island state or lower banana branch and Z sources in the NB (the VLFN frequency range is similar). The VLFN rms of GX 13+1 generally decreases with Sa. This is the opposite of what is normally seen in both atoll and Z sources, where the VLFN increases with Sa along the whole track (see, however, Wijnands et al. 1999, on the atoll source 4U 1820-30). The BLN is quite weak (∼2 -- 5%) compared to that in atoll sources in the island state and lower banana and its rms decreases with Sa as is usual in atoll and Z sources, but in tracks 4 and 9 it increases again in the high- est Sa intervals. The characteristic frequency of the BLN also decreases with Sa, which, in either atoll sources in the island state and lower banana branch or Z sources, has so far only been observed in the atoll source 4U 1820-30, where a BLN- like component that evolves into or is replaced by a ∼7 Hz QPO (Wijnands et al. 1999) is seen. In the Z source GX 349+2, a similar noise component is seen of which the centroid fre- quency decreases with Sa, but the νmax of this component shows a more complicated dependence on Sa (O'Neill et al. 2002). Generally, in atoll sources the νmax of the BLN in- creases with Sa up to the upper banana, where it starts to de- crease again, whereas in Z sources it increases monotonically. We find the QPO properties of GX 13+1 to be unlike ei- ther Z or atoll sources. At the lowest Sa intervals the 57-69 Hz QPO found by Homan et al. (1998) is detected. In atoll sources a low frequency QPO is usually detected in the island state with a frequency of 10-15 Hz (see, however, Wijnands et al. 1999) ,increasing up to 40-47 Hz towards the upper banana, where it becomes undetectable (although a second low frequency QPO is sometimes also seen at similar frequencies, but for higher Sa, see van Straaten et al. 2002). If the QPO would remain de- tectable, one would expect to find such a 57-69 Hz QPO at higher Sa, in the middle banana branch. The HBO in Z sources has a frequency up to ∼55 Hz in the upper NB; if the QPO in GX13+1 is interpreted as this QPO one would also expect to find a ∼6 Hz NBO on this branch; in the Z source GX 349+2 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 13 no NBO is found, but a very broad noise component is seen in- stead (Kuulkers & van der Klis 1998; O'Neill et al. 2001), and of this GX 13+1 shows no evidence either. The fact that no kHz QPOs are detected anywhere along the branch (see Sect. 3.4.3) is uncharacteristic for both atoll and Z sources. Clearly, GX 13+1 is a peculiar source in which the proper- ties correlate to Sa in a very unusual way when compared both to atoll and Z sources. In the final section we explore a possible explanation for this unusual behaviour. 4.4. A jet scenario If the behaviour of GX 13+1 is interpreted within the frame- work of atoll source behaviour, then clearly for high Sa the source is in the upper banana. Based on the CD, at low Sa one would expect the source to be in the lower left banana and is- land state. However, the fact that for low Sa 57-69 Hz QPOs, and weak BLN with a characteristic frequency that decreases with Sa are found, suggests that, contrary to what one would expect based on the CD, the "true" state of the source there is the middle part of the banana branch, because that is where other atoll sources can be expected to show this kind of power spectral behaviour. This is supported by the fact that so far no kHz QPOs have been found in this source, consistent with their absence in other atoll sources in the middle and upper parts of the banana branch. In GX 13+1 the count rate decreases as Sa increases up to Sa=2 -- 3, and only for higher Sa increases, which is what in a regular atoll source one would expect along the whole track (see Sect. 3.2). One interpretation for this unusual behaviour would be that there is something adding extra flux at low Sa, which becomes weaker towards higher Sa resulting in a count rate that first decreases, and then increases as the standard atoll upper banana behaviour takes over. From the two branched structure in the CDs one can conclude that this extra flux would have to be hard, because for low Sa the source spectrum gets harder when the count rate increases. This scenario would also explain why the BLN is so weak and shows a decreasing νmax along the track, and why no kHz QPOs are detected at low Sa: these properties are normal for the middle and upper parts of the banana branch, which is, by hypothesis, the true state of the source. In most atoll sources the low frequency QPO disap- pears at the same Sa, or a slightly lower value, as the kHz QPO (van Straaten et al. 2002; Di Salvo et al. 2003); the fact that in GX 13+1 we still see the low frequency QPO while the kHz QPO is absent is unusual, but in line with the relatively high frequency of the low frequency QPO. So the hypothesis we are exploring is that the hard extra flux creates an anomalous sec- ond branch in the CD reminiscent of a lower banana and island branch, while the source remains in the "middle" banana state. A possible source for this extra, hard flux could be a rela- tivistic jet. In general in atoll and Z sources radio emission, as- cribed to the presence of a relativistic jet (Fender 2002), tends to increase towards lower Sa. If this more intense jet is associ- ated with the extra hard flux, this could cause a second branch in the CD, while the source is still in the upper banana state. We further hypothesize that the unusually strong VLFN would occur in the hard jet flux. Consequently, when the jet becomes weaker towards higher Sa this causes the VLFN to decrease in amplitude. This is in accordance with the fact that up to Sa=2 the absolute rms amplitude of the VLFN decreases, from which it can be concluded that it is the flux, that also decreases in this part of the track, that shows relatively strong VLFN that dis- appears. For Sa >2 the absolute rms amplitude of the VLFN stays approximately constant, while in some tracks the flux in- creases for Sa >3. The extra flux in these tracks does lead to a significant increase of the absolute rms amplitude. The question of course is: why would a jet in GX 13+1 cause this peculiar behaviour and not in other atoll sources? The radio emission of GX 13+1 is unusually strong for an atoll source (Fender & Hendry 2000), so perhaps for a reason un- known the jet is unusually strong in this source. A more at- tractive possibility is that it is not the jet that is unusual, but the system's orientation. If the jet is pointing directly towards us Doppler boosting could significantly increase its radio flux (e.g. Fender & Hendry 2000); a strongly relativistic jet (which has already been directly imaged for the Z source Sco X-1, Fomalont et al. 2001a,b) could easily Doppler boost the radio emission by more than an order of magnitude, putting the radio emission of GX 13+1 in accordance with measurements and upper limits of other atoll sources (Fender & Hendry 2000). The unusual X-ray phenomena could then for example be the consequence of a better view of the X-ray emitting regions as- sociated with the base of the jet, offered by the unusual ori- entation of the disk, possibly assisted by Doppler boosting as well. A similar possibility of Doppler-boosted jet X-ray emis- sion causing hard flaring ("microblazar") was recently explored for Cyg X-1 by Romero et al. (2002). The large shifts of the track in the CD of GX 13+1 com- pared to other atoll and Z sources might be related to this better view of the X-ray emitting base of the jet region as well. This would require this region to contribute different baseline levels of hard flux at different epochs in order to produce the secular motion (which, consistent with this, takes place mostly in the HC), VLFN whose amplitude anticorrelates, as well as extra flux at Sa > 3 which correlates, with this baseline flux level. This could for example be related to secular geometry changes (e.g. precession) modulating our view of the base of the jet, or to variations in the jet activity itself. One can also attempt to explain the peculiar behaviour of GX 13+1 with a similar relativistic jet scenario assuming the source is a Z source. The QPO observed in GX 13+1 would then be interpreted as the HBO, occurring at the top of the NB, leading to the conclusion that the CD shows both a NB and a FB. The strong VLFN that decreases along the whole track might be related to a jet similarly to the atoll scenario. This jet could be related to the high radio over X-ray luminosity ratio compared to other Z sources. However, this model leaves unexplained the decreasing frequency of the BLN with Sa and the absence of an NBO. So, when a choice is made between an atoll or a Z clas- sification for GX 13+1 (in either case modified by an unusual jet geometry) the overall phenomenology favours the former option. An alternative would be that GX 13+1 combines some properties of atoll and Z sources (as noted in Sect. 1, GX 13+1 14 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 has been described as the atoll source closest to the Z sources). This possibility will be further explored in a forthcoming paper (Homan et al. 2003). It has been suggested that narrow absorption features, as found in GX 13+1 (Ueda et al. 2001), are related to a high in- clination of the source, contrary to the low inclination predicted by the scenario discussed above. However, it is also possible that the absorption features are not related to the inclination of the source, but, as previously suggested by Ueda et al. (1998), to a highly ionized plasma associated with their relativistic jets, causing absorption from the flux from the hot inner accretion region. Several predictions can be made based on the atoll source+jet hypothesis. Since the unusually strong VLFN oc- curs in the jet flux, one expects the VLFN, at low Sa, to be the strongest in the hard flux. Also, as the jet is the main source of radio emission in LMXBs, we expect the radio emission to be strongest in the upper part of the second branch in the CD (at low Sa), decreasing as the source moves towards the vertex. This can be tested with simultaneous radio and X-ray obser- vations. One would have to account for a delay factor in the radio emission of perhaps up to half an hour (Klein-Wolt et al. 2002) associated with the expansion of the synchrotron clouds. Such observations have been done by Garcia et al. (1988), but with a small time range (∼5 hours of overlapping X-ray and radio observations) and no CD analysis was performed, and by Berendsen et al. (2000), also with a short period of overlapping X-ray and radio observations. Recent simultaneous radio and X-ray observations also exist (to be reported in Homan et al. 2003), and preliminary results of this work that became avail- able after the current analysis and interpretation were com- pleted, appear to confirm our suggestion. Acknowledgements. RS and MK acknowledge support from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). References Ford, E. C., van der Klis, M., M´endez, M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, 368 Garcia, M. R., Grindlay, J. E., Molnar, L. A., et al. 1988, ApJ, 328, 552 Gierli´nski, M. & Done, C. 2002, MNRAS, 331, L47 Hasinger, G. & van der Klis, M. 1989, A&A, 225, 79 Hasinger, G., van der Klis, M., Ebisawa, K., Dotani, T., & Mitsuda, K. 1990, A&A, 235, 131 Homan, J., van der Klis, M., Jonker, P. G., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 878 Homan, J., van der Klis, M., Wijnands, R., Vaughan, B., & Kuulkers, E. 1998, ApJ, 499, L41 Homan, J., Wijnands, R., Fender, R., et al. 2003, in prep. Jahoda, K., Swank, J. H., Giles, A. B., et al. 1996, in Proc. SPIE Vol. 2808, p. 59-70, EUV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, Oswald H. Siegmund; Mark A. Gummin; Eds., 59 -- 70 Jonker, P. G., van der Klis, M., Homan, J., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 665 Jonker, P. G., van der Klis, M., Wijnands, R., et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, 374 Klein-Wolt, M., Fender, R. P., Pooley, G. G., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 745 Kuulkers, E. & van der Klis, M. 1996, A&A, 314, 567 -- . 1998, A&A, 332, 845 Kuulkers, E., van der Klis, M., Oosterbroek, T., et al. 1994, A&A, 289, 795 Kuulkers, E., van der Klis, M., & Vaughan, B. 1996, A&A, 311, 197 Kuulkers, E., Wijnands, R., & van der Klis, M. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 485 Lewin, W. H. G., van Paradijs, J., Hasinger, G., et al. 1987, MNRAS, 226, 383 Matsuba, E., Dotani, T., Mitsuda, K., et al. 1995, PASJ, 47, 575 Muno, M. P., Remillard, R. A., & Chakrabarty, D. 2002, ApJ, 568, L35 O'Neill, P. M., Kuulkers, E., Sood, R. K., & Dotani, T. 2001, A&A, 370, 479 O'Neill, P. M., Kuulkers, E., Sood, R. K., & van der Klis, M. Bandyopadhyay, R. M., Shahbaz, T., Charles, P. A., & Naylor, 2002, MNRAS, 336, 217 T. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 417 Barret, D. & Olive, J. 2002, ApJ, 576, 391 Belloni, T., Psaltis, D., & van der Klis, M. 2002, ApJ, 572, 392 Berendsen, S. G. H., Fender, R., Kuulkers, E., Heise, J., & van Prins, S. & van der Klis, M. 1997, A&A, 319, 498 Romero, G. E., Kaufman Bernad`o, M. M., & Mirabel, I. F. 2002, A&A, 393, L61 Schulz, N. S., Hasinger, G., & Truemper, J. 1989, A&A, 225, der Klis, M. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 599 48 Bradt, H. V., Rothschild, R. E., & Swank, J. H. 1993, A&AS, Sidoli, L., Parmar, A. N., Oosterbroek, T., & Lumb, D. 2002, 97, 355 A&A, 385, 940 Di Salvo, T., M´endez, M., van der Klis, M., Ford, E., & Robba, Stella, L., White, N. E., & Taylor, B. G. 1985, in Recent Results N. R. 2001, ApJ, 546, 1107 Di Salvo, T., M´endez, M., & van der Klis, M. 2003, accepted Dieters, S. W. & van der Klis, M. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 201 Fender, R. 2002, in LNP Vol. 589: Relativistic Flows in Astrophysics, 101 Fender, R. P. & Hendry, M. A. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 1 Fleischman, J. R. 1985, A&A, 153, 106 Fomalont, E. B., Geldzahler, B. J., & Bradshaw, C. F. 2001a, ApJ, 553, L27 -- . 2001b, ApJ, 558, 283 on Cataclysmic Variables, 125 -- 128 Ueda, Y., Asai, K., Yamaoka, K., Dotani, T., & Inoue, H. 2001, ApJ, 556, L87 Ueda, Y., Inoue, H., Tanaka, Y., et al. 1998, ApJ, 492, 782 van der Klis, M. 1995, in X-Ray Binaries, ed. W. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, & E. van den Heuvel (Cambridge University Press), 252 -- 307 van der Klis, M. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 717 van der Klis, M. 2001, ApJ, 561, 943 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 15 van Straaten, S., Ford, E. C., van der Klis, M., M´endez, M., & Kaaret, P. 2000, ApJ, 540, 1049 van Straaten, S., van der Klis, M., di Salvo, T., & Belloni, T. 2002, ApJ, 568, 912 van Straaten, S., van der Klis, M., & M´endez, M. 2003, sub- mitted Wijnands, R. 2001, Advances in Space Research, 28, 469 Wijnands, R., van der Klis, M., & Rijkhorst, E. 1999, ApJ, 512, L39 16 Track nr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10a 10b 10c 11a 11b 12 Vertex SC 3.07 3.13 - 3.10 3.27 Sshift 0.00 0.092 - 0.085 0.249 HC 0.46 0.53 - 0.54 0.60 768.2±43.3 857.1±47.8 - 864.2±53.7 824.4±36.2 0.51 3.14 0.086 829.2±49.9 0.51 3.14 0.086 837.3±50.7 0.46 3.08 0.010 756.0±50.0 0.66 3.30 0.305 842.7±20.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.49 3.14 0.076 829.7±33.6 30051-01-01-01 30051-01-02-00 30051-01-03-01 30051-01-04-00 30051-01-05-00 30051-01-06-00 30051-01-07-01 30051-01-08-00 30050-01-01-00 30050-01-01-02 30050-01-01-04 30050-01-01-05 30050-01-01-07 30050-01-01-08 30050-01-02-01 30050-01-02-03 30051-01-09-00 30051-01-10-00 30051-01-11-00 30051-01-11-02 30051-01-12-00 30051-01-12-01 30051-01-12-02 30050-01-03-00 30050-01-03-01 30050-01-03-02 30050-01-03-03 R. S. Schnerr et al.: Peculiar behaviour of the LMXB GX 13+1 Flux at Sa = 2 (cnts s−1 PCU−1) Observation ID of included observations tstart (UTC) tend (UTC) month-day hours:min 05-17 11:01 05-21 12:39 05-17 20:57 05-24 19:21 05-28 08:33 06-01 09:60 06-05 05:16 05-28 14:30 06-01 17:40 06-09 12:42 tobs (ks) 28 29 2 28 25 06-13 01:26 06-17 15:29 110 06-17 15:58 06-20 10:19 69 30051-01-01-00 30051-01-03-00 30051-01-03-02 30051-01-04-01 30051-01-07-00 30051-01-07-02 30051-01-08-01 30050-01-01-01 30050-01-01-03 30050-01-01-050 30050-01-01-06 30050-01-01-080 30050-01-02-00 30050-01-02-02 30051-01-09-01 06-26 09:34 06-29 16:09 30051-01-11-01 30051-01-11-03 07-03 14:22 07-09 15:40 07-13 09:36 07-31 15:11 08-09 13:31 08-14 13:18 08-21 13:02 10-10 01:45 07-13 15:39 07-31 18:59 08-09 17:25 08-14 17:55 08-21 16:11 10-10 06:44 41 78 22 14 14 17 11 18 Table 1. The RXTE observation IDs of the observations that are included in each track, the HC and SC of their vertices, and the distance, Sshift, over which each track is shifted relative to track 1. Average flux at the vertex (Sa = 2), start time of the first and end time of the last included observations and the total included observation time are also indicated. Note that tracks 3, 10a-c and 11a-b do not show a vertex. All dates are in the year 1998; typical errors in HC are ∼ 0.01, in SC∼ 0.03, in Sshift ∼ 0.01 and in flux at Sa = 2 ∼ 43. Track Sa 1 1 2 2 2 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 1.38±0.03 1.47±0.04 1.51±0.05 1.64±0.04 1.76±0.03 1.41±0.05 1.60±0.07 1.31±0.05 1.50±0.08 1.76±0.08 1.16±0.06 1.38±0.08 Sign. (σ) 4.3 3.8 3.7 3.5 2.7 7.4 6.7 6.7 11.2 2.7 10.0 4.4 νmax (Hz) 66+5 −4 66+5 −4 69±2 73+4 −3 74±3 66.2+1.2 −1.3 65.5+1.6 −1.5 63.9±0.9 64.2±0.7 64.3+5.7 −1.4 64.1+1.1 −1.0 62±3 Amplitude (% rms) 2.3±0.3 1.9±0.3 1.8±0.3 1.5±0.2 1.3±0.3 2.7±0.2 2.05+0.15 −0.16 2.20±0.17 2.37+0.10 −0.11 1.0+0.4 −0.2 2.75+0.13 −0.14 2.2+0.2 −0.3 Q 2.0+0.8 −0.6 2.2+1.4 −0.8 4.5+2.3 −1.5 3.7+2.7 −1.5 5+6 −2 4.0+0.9 −0.7 3.7+0.9 −0.7 4.4+1.0 −0.8 3.5+0.5 −0.4 9+36 −7 3.0+0.4 −0.3 2.6+1.2 −0.7 Table 2. All detected QPOs and their properties. Typical 95% confidence upper limits (νmax = 68 Hz, Q = 3) for tracks in which the QPO was not detected are up to ∼2% rms.
astro-ph/9811428	1	9811	1998-11-27T05:21:09	3D Simulation of the Gas Dynamics in the Central Parsec of the Galaxy	[ "astro-ph" ]	It is thought that many characteristics of the gaseous features within the central parsec of our Galaxy, are associated with the accretion of ambient plasma by a central concentration of mass. Using a 3D hydrodynamical code, we have been simulating this process in order to realistically model the gaseous flows in the center of our Galaxy. In the most recent simulation, we have taken into account the multi-point-like distribution of stellar wind sources, as well as the magnetic heating and radiative cooling of these stellar winds. As expected, we find that the structure of the flow is significantly different from that due to a uniform medium. We also investigate the possibility that Sgr A* is due to a distributed mass concentration instead of the canonical point mass of a black hole. We discuss the physical state of the accreting gas and how our results suggest that Sgr A* is unlikely to be associated with a ``dark cluster''.	astro-ph	astro-ph	3D Simulation of the Gas Dynamics in the Central Parsec of the Galaxy R.F. Coker1 Physics Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Fulvio Melia2 Physics Department and Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Abstract. It is thought that many characteristics of the gaseous fea- tures within the central parsec of our Galaxy, are associated with the accretion of ambient plasma by a central concentration of mass. Using a 3D hydrodynamical code, we have been simulating this process in order to realistically model the gaseous flows in the center of our Galaxy. In the most recent simulation, we have taken into account the multi-point- like distribution of stellar wind sources, as well as the magnetic heating and radiative cooling of these stellar winds. As expected, we find that the structure of the flow is significantly different from that due to a uni- form medium. We also investigate the possibility that Sgr A* is due to a distributed mass concentration instead of the canonical point mass of a black hole. We discuss the physical state of the accreting gas and how our results suggest that Sgr A* is unlikely to be associated with a "dark cluster". 1. Introduction The hydrodynamics of the interstellar medium (ISM) within the central parsec of the Galaxy has long been thought to be dominated by the gravitational potential due to a central mass concentration (for a review, see Mezger, Duschl, & Zylka, 1996). For example, the Western Arc, one of the dominant kinematic features of the region, appears to be in circular rotation about Sgr A, a unique compact radio source whose lack of proper motion suggests it lies at the dynamical heart of the Galaxy (Roberts & Goss, 1993; Backer, 1994). Stellar motions (Genzel, et. al., 1997), gas kinematics (Herbst, et. al., 1993), and velocity dispersion measurements (Eckart & Genzel, 1998) together suggest the presence of ∼ 2.6 × 106M⊙ of dark mass located within ∼ .01 parsecs of Sgr A. Note that the 1NASA GSRP Fellow. 2Presidential Young Investigator. 1 Galactic center (GC) is at a distance of ∼ 8 kpc so that 1 arcsecond ∼ 0.04 parsecs. However, showing that the GC must contain a centralized dark mass con- centration does not necessarily imply that it is in the form of a single compact object nor does it imply that Sgr A* must be associated with it. Stellar kine- matic arguments (Genzel et. al., 1996) rule out a distribution of neutron stars or white dwarfs. One possibility is that the dark mass distribution consists of ∼ 10M⊙ black holes; cluster evolution calculations (Lee, 1995) have shown that this is at least feasible although stability arguments (Maoz, 1998) suggest the cluster lifetime would be ∼ 108 years, considerably less than the age of the Galaxy. In this paper, we wish to determine if, stability arguments aside, the spectrum of Sgr A* could be due to a plasma trapped within the potential well of a dark cluster of arbitrary objects. In addition to large scale gaseous features, there is ample evidence for the existence of rather strong stellar winds in and around Sgr A* itself. The key wind sources appear to be the cluster of mass-losing, blue, luminous stars comprising the IRS 16 assemblage, located within several arcseconds of Sgr A. A variety of observations over the years (for a review see Morris & Serabyn, 1996) provide clear evidence of a hypersonic wind, with a velocity of vw ∼ 500 − 1000 km Mw ∼ s−1, a number density nw ∼ 103−4 cm−3, and a total mass loss rate 3 − 4 × 10−3M⊙ yr−1 pervading the inner parsec of the Galaxy. If the dark matter is distributed, it is likely that a portion of this wind is captured by the dark compact cluster and that it settles within the cluster's potential well. Although the potential well of a cluster does not include a cusp such as that due to a black hole, the trapped plasma might conceivably still account for at least some of Sgr A's radiative characteristics. In §2 we discuss the simulation of the gas flow through a distributed dark mass cluster. In §3 we describe the resulting spectrum and present some prelim- inary semi-analytical spectral calculations based on Sgr A* being a point mass while in §4 we summarize our analysis. 2. The 3D Hydrodynamical Model In the classical Bondi-Hoyle scenario (Bondi & Hoyle, 1944), the mass accretion rate for a uniform hypersonic adiabatic gas flowing past a centralized mass is MBH = πRA 2mHnwvw , (1) 2 is the accretion radius and M is the mass of the central- where RA ≡ 2GM/vw ized object(s). At the GC, for the conditions described in the Introduction, we would therefore expect an accretion rate MBH ∼ 1021−22g sec−1, with a capture radius RA ∼ 0.01 − 0.02 pc. Since this accretion rate is sub-Eddington for a ∼ one million solar mass concentration, the accreting gas is unimpeded by the escaping radiation field and is thus essentially in hydrodynamic free-fall starting at RA. Our initial, simplistic, numerical simulations of this process, where we assume a point object and uniform flow (Ruffert & Melia, 1994; Coker & Melia, 1996) have verified these expectations. 2 2.1. The Stellar Wind Sources The GC wind, however, is unlikely to be uniform since the winds from many stars contribute to the mass ejection. We assume that the early-type stars enclosed (in projection) within the Western Arc, the Northern Arm, and the Bar produce the observed wind. Thus far, 25 such stars have been identified (Genzel, et. al., 1996), though the stellar wind characteristics of only 8 have been determined from their He I line emission (Najarro, et. al., 1997); the relavant characteristics of these 25 stars are summarized in Table 1. Two sources, IRS 13E1 and IRS 7W, seem to dominate the mass outflow with their high wind velocity (∼ 1000 km sec−1) and a mass loss rate of more than 2 × 10−4 M⊙ yr−1 each. Unfortunately, the temperature of the stellar winds is not well known, and so for simplicity we have assumed that all the winds are Mach 30; this corresponds to a temperature of 104−5K. In addition, for the sources that are used in these calculations, their location in z (i.e., along the line of sight) is determined randomly with the condition that the overall distribution in this direction approximately matches that in x and y. Table 1. Parameters for Galactic Center Wind Sources Star IRS 16NE IRS 16NW IRS 16C IRS 16SW IRS 13E1 IRS 7W AF IRS 15SWb IRS 15NEb IRS 29Nc IRS 33Ec IRS 34Wc IRS 1Wc IRS 9NWcd IRS 6Wc AF NWcd BLUMb IRS 9Sb Unnamed 1b IRS 16SEb IRS 29NEb IRS 7SEb Unnamed 2b IRS 7Eb AF NWWb xa(arcsec) ya(arcsec) za(arcsec) v (km sec−1) M(10−5 M⊙ yr−1) 5.5 7.3 -7.1 4.9 -1.5 -5.1 8.5 3.5 1.5 -6.4 7.8 -3.8 3.6 -2.1 550 750 650 650 1000 1000 700 700 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 9.5 5.3 10.5 15.5 79.1 20.7 8.7 16.5 18.0 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 -2.6 0.2 -1.0 -0.6 3.4 4.1 7.3 1.5 -1.6 1.6 0.0 3.9 -5.3 -2.5 8.1 8.3 9.2 -5.5 1.3 -1.4 1.1 -2.7 3.8 -4.2 10.2 0.8 1.0 0.2 -1.3 -1.7 4.8 -6.7 10.1 11.4 1.4 -3.0 1.6 0.3 -6.2 1.6 -3.1 -5.0 -9.2 -0.6 -1.4 1.8 3.0 -4.2 4.9 -2.7 aRelative to Sgr A* in l-b coordinates (negative x is east and negative y is south of Sgr A) bStar not used in these calculations cWind velocity and mass loss rate fixed (see text) dStar position changed slightly due to finite physical resolution The sources are assumed to be stationary over the duration of the simu- lation. The stars without any observed He I line emission have been assigned 3 a wind velocity of 750 km sec−1 and an equal mass loss rate chosen such that the total mass ejected by the 14 stars used here is equal to 3 × 10−3 M⊙ yr−1. Note that although we have matched the overall mass outflow rate to the ob- servations, we have only used 14 of the 25 stars in the sample. There are two principal reasons for this: (1) stars further away than 10 arcsec (in projection) from Sgr A are outside of our volume of solution and therefore could not be included, and (2) due to our computational resolution limits, we needed to avoid excessively large local stellar densities. In a complex flow, generated by many wind sources, the wind velocity and density are not uniform, so the accretion radius is not independent of angle. To set the length scale for the simulation, we shall therefore adopt the value RA = .018pc (for which 1′′ = 2.3 RA) as a reasonable mean representation of this quantity. 2.2. The Dark Cluster Potential We wish to study the emission characteristics of a hot, magnetized plasma "trapped" within the dark cluster's gravitational potential well. Following Haller & Melia (1996), we will represent the gravitational potential of the dark clus- ter with an "η-model" (Tremaine, et. al., 1994). This function represents an isotropic mass distribution with a single parameter. We here restrict our exam- ination to the case η = 2.5 since this provides the closest approximation to a King model that is physically realizable (i.e., a nonnegative distribution func- tion). We scale the mass so that 2 × 106 M⊙ are enclosed within 0.01 pc and the total integrated mass of the dark cluster is 2.7 × 106 M⊙. Thus, writing r in units of RA we get for the enclosed mass as a function of r, Mη(r) = 2.7 × 106(cid:18) 13.84r 1 + 13.84r(cid:19)5/2 M⊙ . (2) A more recent assessment of the enclosed mass (Genzel, et. al., 1997) places a yet more rigorous constraint on the possibility of a distributed dark matter component. These newer observations may indeed invalidate the idea that any realistic stable distribution of objects can account for the observed gravitational potential. 2.3. The Hydrodynamics Code We use a modified version of the numerical finite difference algorithm ZEUS, a general purpose code for MHD fluids developed at NCSA (Stone & Norman, 1992; Norman, 1994). The code was run on the massively parallel Cray T3E at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center under the High Performance Computing Challenge program. Zone sizes are geometrically scaled by a factor of 1.02 so that the central zones are ∼ 20 times smaller than the outermost zones, mimicking the "multiply nested grids" arrangement used by other researchers (e.g., Ruffert & Melia, 1994). This allows for maximal resolution of the central region (within the computer memory limits available) while sufficiently resolving the wind sources and minimizing zone-to-zone boundary effects. The total volume is (40RA)3 or ∼ (0.7pc)3 with the center of the spherically symmetric dark cluster distribution being located at the origin. 4 The density of the gas initially filling the volume of solution is set to a small value and the velocity is set to zero, while the internal energy density is chosen such that the initial gas temperature is ∼ 102 K. Free outflow conditions are imposed on the outermost zones and each time step is determined by the Courant condition with a Courant number of 0.5. The 14 stellar wind sources are modeled by forcing the velocity in 14 subregions of 125 zones each to be constant with time while the densities in these subvolumes are set so that the total mass flow into the volume of solution from each source is given by Table 1. Also, the magnetic field of the winds is assumed to always be at equipartition with the thermal energy density. The angular momentum and mass accretion rates are calculated by summing the relevant quantity in zones located within 0.1RA of the origin. We assume the magnetic field is perfectly tangled and thus ignore the ef- fects of the magnetic field on the large scale kinematics. We take the medium to be an adiabatic polytropic gas, with γ = 5/3. Building on previous work (Melia, 1994; Coker & Melia, 1997), we have included a first order approxi- mation to magnetic dissipative heating as well as an accurate expression for the cooling due to magnetic bremsstrahlung, thermal bremsstrahlung, line emission, radiative recombination, and 2 photon continuum emission for a gas with cos- mic abundance. For magnetic heating, we assume that the magnetic field never rises above equipartition. If compression and flux conservation would otherwise dictate a magnetic field larger than the equipartition value, the field lines are assumed to reconnect rapidly, converting the magnetic field energy into thermal energy, thereby re-establishing equipartition conditions. The cooling function includes a multiple-Gaussian fit to the relevant cooling emissivities provided by N. Gehrels (see Gehrels & Williams, 1993, and references cited therein), though with the thermal bremsstrahlung portion supplanted with more accurate ex- pressions that are valid over a broader range of physical conditions and with the inclusion of magnetic bremsstrahlung. For details on the cooling expressions used in the hydrodynamics code as well as the spectrum calculations below, see Melia & Coker (1999). Note that cooling due to Comptonization and any pair production have not yet been included since they are not thought to be signifi- cant in the vicinity of Sgr A. Also, it is assumed that the optical depth is small throughout the volume of solution. 2.4. Results of the 3D Simulation The integrated emissivity along the line-of-sight, at ∼ 1450 years after the start of the simulation, is shown in Figure 1. The grey scale is logarithmic with solid white corresponding to a frequency-integrated intensity of ∼ 1.1 × 105 erg cm−2 s−1 steradian−1, and black corresponding to ∼ 1 × 10−2 erg cm−2 s−1 steradian−1. Sgr A is located at the center of the image. Of particular interest in this image is the appearance of streaks of high-velocity, high-density gas ("streamers") that are very reminiscent of features, such as the so-called "Bullet" seen near the Galactic center (Yusef-Zadeh, et al. 1996). In our simulation, these structures are produced predominantly within the wind-wind collision regions, and in the future, we shall consider in greater detail the possibility that the observed high-velocity gas components near Sgr A* are produced in this fashion. 5 Figure 1. The line-of-sight integrated emissivity along the z-axis. Note the dominant role played by IRS 13E1 to the lower right of the compact radio source. After reaching equilibrium several sound crossing times (∼ 1000 years) after the start of the simulation, the enclosed mass and energy begin to fluctuate aperiodically on time scales of less than a few decades and with an amplitude of up to 50%, reflecting the turbulent cell nature of the flow in and out of the central region. Typically 2.7 × 10−3 M⊙ of gas is trapped within the cluster at any given time. Also, although the gas is generally supersonic, with most of the energy in kinetic form, the thermal energy can be boosted rather suddenly when the enclosed magnetic field energy is dissipated. This occurs when strong shocks pass through the central region; the shocks compress the field sufficiently to the point where it reaches, or even surpasses, equipartition and dissipation ensues. 6 3. The Spectrum of Sgr A* 3.1. The Spectrum due to a Dark Cluster In order to calculate the observed continuum spectrum, we assume that the observer is positioned along the negative z-axis at infinity and we sum the emis- sion from all zones that are located at a projected distance, Rxy, of less than 0.1 RA. Since the size of Sgr A* (at λ7 mm) is ≈ 1012−13 cm (Bower & Backer, 1998) and the smallest cell size in our simulation is 7 × 1014 cm, in order to minimize the inaccuracy due to numerical fluctuations, we have calculated the spectrum from a central region roughly 10 times this size (0.1RA), to include at least 100 zones. Thus clearly our predicted spectrum constitutes an upper limit to the actual emission expected from Sgr A. At the temperature and density that we encounter here, the dominant components of the continuum emissivity are electron-ion and electron-electron bremsstrahlung; we ignore line emission in these spectral calculations. As discussed in Melia (1998), the density in the central region reaches a peak value of roughly 108 cm−3 and the temperature is never greater than about 108 K. Thus, since electrons begin to emit significant synchrotron radiation only above a few times 109 K, the gas can only emit cyclotron radiation. However, the cyclotron emissivity is insignificant compared to bremsstrahlung so that the final spectrum, as shown in Figure 2, is a bremsstrahlung spectrum that,in the radio, falls more than 4 orders of magnitude short of the observed luminosity of Sgr A (compare with Figure 6b in Melia, 1998). Figure 2 shows spectra for 3 points in time during the 3D hydrodynamical simulation. The solid, dotted, and dashed curves are at approximately 1200, 1300, and 1400 years, respectively, after the start of the simulation. The flattening of the density, temperature, and magnetic field profiles is a direct consequence of the shallowness of the dark cluster potential compared to the steep potential gradient encountered by gas falling into a black hole. The high-energy shoulder of the emission shown in Figure 3 is characteristic of the highest temperature Tmax (∼ 108 K) attained by the gas and is consistent with the brightness temperature limit associated with Sgr A. Similarly, the X-ray and γ-ray emission is significantly below the observed upper limits (Predehl & Truemper, 1994; Goldwurm, et. al., 1994). 3.2. The Spectrum due to a Black Hole Although we have not yet run a 3D hydrodynamical simulation using the grav- itational potential due to a point mass, we have undertaken semi-analytical calculations that improve upon earlier work (Melia, 1994). Although details will be presented elsewhere (Coker & Melia, 1999), we here present some preliminary results. We now explicitly solve for the velocity of the spherical flow using the relativistic Euler equation and integrate over µ, the cosine of the angle between the line-of-sight and the flow. We also include effects due to inverse Compton scattering and the index of refraction. In recent work (Lo, et. al., 1998) it has been suggested that, at mm wave- lengths at least, the intrinsic size of Sgr A varies as να with −1.9 < α < −0.7. It is difficult to compare the absolute observed size, which is usually the FWHM of a best-fit Gaussian (e.g. Krichbaum, et. al., 1998), to a theoretical size, which is usually given as the surface of last scatterring where τ (ν) ≡ 1; the 7 Figure 2. Plot of the predicted luminosity density versus frequency. observational size will tend to be larger than the theoretical size with these def- initions. However, Figure 3 shows a plot of the predicited intrinsic size of Sgr A* along with present observational values (see Lo, et. al. 1998 and references cited therein for details). The slope of the line is ∼ −0.6, somewhat less steep than the observed value. This is not surprising since this particular model does not produce enough low frequency magnetic bremsstrahlung at large radii. The slope should steepen when a more optimal fit to the spectrum is found. Note that the lower size bound on the plot corresponds to the size of the black hole itself (1Rs ∼ 6µas). 4. Summary It does not appear, based on these calculations, that the gravitational poten- tial of a distributed dark mass, be it due to a compact cluster of stellar rem- nants or an even more exotic collection of objects (e.g. Tsiklauri & Viollier, 8 Figure 3. & Melia, 1999). Plot of the predicted size of Sgr A* versus frequency (Coker 1998), can compress the gas from stellar winds to the point where the tem- perature, density, and magnetic field can produce an observationally significant cyclotron/synchrotron emissivity at GHz frequencies. Although the spatial res- olution of the simulation near the origin can be improved over that used here, it is unlikely that it will alter the results; the lack of compression is due to the inherently flat potential of any distributed dark cluster. Thus, aside from the issue of whether any dark cluster can account for the observed GC potential and whether any such cluster is stable over a significant fraction of the age of the Galaxy, our 3D hydrodynamical simulation has shown that the radio emissivity from the gas trapped within any such cluster cannot reprodude the spectrum of Sgr A. We are left to conclude that either Sgr A is unrelated to the accreting or trapped GC gas or that Sgr A* is the signature of an accreting, massive black hole. However, models of the structure and mechanism of radio emission from such a black hole are now faced with futher contraints due to recent observations of the intrinsic source structure of Sgr A. Coupled with the observed spectral energy distribution of Sgr A, we may be close to differentiating between the various accretion models. Acknowledgments. This work was partially supported by NASA grant NGT-51637 and has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Abstract Service. 9 References Backer, D.C. 1994, in The nuclei of normal galaxies, ed. R. Genzel & A.I. Harris (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 403. Bondi, H, & Hoyle, F. 1944, MNRAS, 104, 273. Bower, G.C. & Backer, D.C. 1998, ApJ, 496, 97L. Coker, R., & Melia, F. 1996, in ASP Conf. Vol. 102, The Galactic Center: 4th ESO/CTIO Workshop, ed. R. Gredel (San Francisco: ASP), 403. Coker, R. & Melia, F., 1997, ApJ, 488, L149. Coker, R. & Melia, F., 1999, in preperation. Eckart, A. & Genzel, R., 1998, these proceedings. Gehrels, N. & Williams, E. D. 1993, ApJ, 418, L25. Genzel, R., Thatte, N., Krabbe, A., Kroker, H., & Tacconi-Garman, L.E., 1996, ApJ, 472, 153. Genzel, R., Eckart, A., Ott, T. & Eisenhauer, F. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 219. Goldwurm, A., et. al., 1994, Nature, 371, 589. Haller, J.M., & Melia, F. 1996, ApJ, 464, 774. Haller, J.M., Rieke, M.J., Rieke, G.H., Tamblyn, P., Close, L., & Melia, F. 1996, ApJ, 456, 194. Herbst, T.M., Beckwith, S.V.W., Forrest, W.J., Pipher, J.L. 1993, AJ, 105, 956. Lee, H.M. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 605. Lo, K.Y., Shen, Z.-Q., Zhao, J.-H., & Ho, P. 1998, ApJ, 508, L61. Lutz, D., Krabbe, A. & Genzel, R. 1993, ApJ, 418, 244. Maoz, E. 1998, ApJ, 494, L181. Melia, F. 1994, ApJ, 426, 577. Melia, F. 1998, these proceedings. Melia, F. & Coker, R. 1999, ApJ, in press. Mezger, P.G., Duschl, W.J. & Zylka, R. 1996, A&A Rev., 7, 289. Morris, M. & Serabyn, E. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 645. Najarro, F., Krabbe, A., Genzel, R., Lutz, D., Kudritzki, R., & Hillier, D. 1997, A&A, 325, 700. Narayan, R., Yi, I. & Mahadevan, R. 1995, Nature, 374, 623. Norman, M. 1994, BAAS, 184, 50.01. Predehl, P. & Truemper, J. 1994, a, 290, 29. Roberts, D.A. & Goss, W.M. 1993, ApJS, 86, 133. Ruffert, M., & Melia, F. 1994, A.A.Letters, 288, L29. Stone, J.M., & Norman, M.L. 1992, ApJS, 80, 753. Tremaine, S., Richstone, D. O., Byun, Y., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Grillmair, C., Kormendy, J., & Lauer, T. R. 1994, AJ, 107, 634. Yusef-Zadeh, F., Roberts, D.A., Goss, W.M., Frail, D. & Green, A. 1996, ApJ, 466, L25. 10
0704.2204	1	0704	2007-04-17T17:55:29	The Differential Rotation of Kappa1 Ceti as Observed by MOST	[ "astro-ph" ]	We first reported evidence for differential rotation of Kappa1 Ceti in Paper I. In this paper we demonstrate that the differential rotation pattern closely matches that for the Sun. This result is based on additional MOST (Microvariability & Oscillations of STars) observations in 2004 and 2005, to complement the 2003 observations discussed in Paper I. Using StarSpotz, a program developed specifically to analyze MOST photometry, we have solved for k, the differential rotation coefficient, and P_{EQ}, the equatorial rotation period using the light curves from all three years. The spots range in latitude from 10 to 75 degrees and k = 0.090^{+0.006}_{-0.005} -- less than the solar value but consistent with the younger age of the star. k is also well constrained by the independent spectroscopic estimate of vsini. We demonstrate independently that the pattern of differential rotation with latitude in fact conforms to solar. Details are given of the parallel tempering formalism used in finding the most robust solution which gives P_{EQ} = 8.77^{+0.03}_{-0.04} days -- smaller than that usually adopted, implying an age < 750 My. Our values of P_{EQ} and k can explain the range of rotation periods determined by others by spots or activity at a variety of latitudes. Historically, Ca II activity seems to occur consistently between latitudes 50 and 60 degrees which might indicate a permanent magnetic feature. Knowledge of k and P_{EQ} are key to understanding the dynamo mechanism and rotation structure in the convective zone as well assessing age for solar-type stars. We recently published values of k and P_{EQ} for epsilon Eri based on MOST photometry and expect to analyze MOST light curves for several more spotted, solar-type stars.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft October 28, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 THE DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION OF κ1 CETI AS OBSERVED BY MOST1 -- II Gordon A.H. Walker2, Bryce Croll3, Rainer Kuschnig3, Andrew Walker4, Slavek M. Rucinski5, Jaymie M. Matthews3, David B. Guenther6, Anthony F.J. Moffat7, Dimitar Sasselov8, Werner W. Weiss9 Draft October 28, 2018 ABSTRACT We first reported evidence for differential rotation of κ1 Ceti in Paper I. In this paper we demon- strate that the differential rotation pattern closely matches that for the Sun. This result is based on additional MOST (Microvariability & Oscillations of STars) observations in 2004 and 2005, to comple- ment the 2003 observations discussed in Paper I. Using StarSpotz, a program developed specifically to analyze MOST photometry, we have solved for k, the differential rotation coefficient, and PEQ, the equatorial rotation period using the light curves from all three years. The spots range in latitude from 10◦ to 75◦ and k = 0.090+0.006 −0.005 -- less than the solar value but consistent with the younger age of the star. k is also well constrained by the independent spectroscopic estimate of vsini. We demonstrate independently that the pattern of differential rotation with latitude in fact conforms to solar. Details are given of the parallel tempering formalism used in finding the most robust solution which gives PEQ = 8.77+0.03 −0.04 days -- smaller than that usually adopted, implying an age < 750 My. Our values of PEQ and k can explain the range of rotation periods determined by others by spots or activity at a variety of latitudes. Historically, Ca II activity seems to occur consistently between latitudes 50◦ and 60◦ which might indicate a permanent magnetic feature. Knowledge of k and PEQ are key to understanding the dynamo mechanism and rotation structure in the convective zone as well assessing age for solar-type stars. We recently published values of k and PEQ for ǫ Eri based on MOST photometry and expect to analyse MOST light curves for several more spotted, solar-type stars. Subject headings: individual: Kappa1 Ceti, HD 20630 -- stars: stars: activity -- stars: stars: starspots -- stars: rotation -- stars: oscillations -- stars: exoplanets late-type -- 1. INTRODUCTION Differential rotation and convection provide the engine for the solar dynamo (eg. Ossendrijver (2003)). The mechanism suggested by Lebedinskii (1941) for differ- ential rotation seems to be the most widely accepted. Angular momentum is continually redistributed in the deep convective envelope which occupies some 30% of the outer solar radius resulting in nonuniform rotation because the convective turbulence is affected by the Cori- olis force (Kitchatinov 2005). There is good evidence 1 Based on data from the MOST satellite, a Canadian Space Agency mission, jointly operated by Dynacon Inc., the University of Toronto Institute of Aerospace Studies and the University of British Columbia with the assistance of the University of Vienna. 2 1234 Hewlett Place, Victoria, BC V8S 4P7, Canada; gor- [email protected] 3 Dept. Physics & Astronomy, UBC, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 4 Sumus Technology Ltd.; [email protected] 5 Dept. Astronomy & Astrophysics, David Dunlap Obs., Univ. Toronto P.O. Box 360, Richmond Hill, ON L4C 4Y6, Canada; [email protected] 6 Department of Astronomy and Physics, St. Mary's University Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada; [email protected] 7 D´ept de physique, Univ de Montr´eal C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre- Ville, Montr´eal, QC H3C 3J7, and Obs du mont M´egantic, Canada; [email protected] 8 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; [email protected] 9 Institut fur Astronomie, Universitat Wien Turkenschanzstrasse 17, A -- 1180 Wien, Austria; [email protected] that a younger Sun would have rotated more rapidly and gradually lost angular momentum through magnetic cou- pling to the solar wind and there is currently a consid- erable theoretical effort to develope quantitative models of differential rotation in solar-type stars (see, for exam- ple, reviews by Kitchatinov (2005) and Thompson et al. (2003)). For stars other than the Sun, the simultaneous detec- tion of two or more spots at different latitudes allows a direct measurement of differential rotation. The MOST photometric satellite (Walker et al. 2003a) offers contin- uous photometry of target stars with an unprecedented precision for weeks at a time making it it possible to track spots accurately. We (Rucinski et al. 2004) have already reported the detection of a pair of spots in the 2003 MOST light curve of κ1 Ceti (HD 20630, HIP 15457, HR 996; V = 4.83, B − V = 0.68, G5V). The photometry was part of the satellite commissioning and prior to a considerable im- provement pointing in early 2004. The larger spot had a well-defined 8.9 d rotation period while the smaller one had a period ≥9.3 d. Only the latitude of the larger spot could be determined with any confidence. Spectroscopic observations by Shkolnik et al. (2003), mostly from 2002, of the Ca II K-line emission reversals were also synchro- nized to a period of about 9.3 d. Rucinski et al. (2004) also determined a stellar radii of R∗ = 0.95 ± 0.10 RJ. To better decipher the spot activity and rotation of κ1 Ceti and to model spot distributions on other MOST 2 Walker et al. targets, one of us, BC, developed the program Starspotz (Croll et al. (2006b); Croll (2006a)). It was applied first to a 2005 MOST light curve covering three rotations of ǫ Eri where two spots were detected at different latitudes rotating with different periods. From this, we derived a differential rotation coefficient for ǫ Eri (see section 4), k = 0.11+.03 −.02, in agreement with models by Brown et al. (2004) for young Sun-like stars rotating roughly twice as fast as the Sun. In this paper, we apply Starspotz to the three separate MOST light curves of κ1 Ceti -- from 2003, 2004 and 2005. We specifically solve for the astrophysically important elements of inclination, differential rotation, equatorial period and rotation speed and find that the differential rotation profile is identical to solar.We use parallel tem- pering methods to fully explore the realistic parameter space and identify the global χ2 minimum to the data-set that signifies a best-fitting unique starspot configuration. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are then used to explore in detail the parameter space around this global minimum, to define best-fitting values and their uncertainties and to explore possible correlations among the fitted and derived parameters. 2. MOST PHOTOMETRY AND LIGHT CURVES The MOST satellite, launched on June 2003, is fully de- scribed by Walker et al. (2003a). A 15/17.3 cm Rumak- Maksutov telescope feeds two CCDs, one for tracking and the other for science, through a single, custom, broad- band filter (350 -- 700 nm). Starlight from primary sci- ence targets (V ≤ 6) is projected onto the science CCD as a fixed (Fabry) image of the telescope entrance pupil covering some 1500 pixels. The experiment was designed to detect photometric variations with periods of minutes at micro-magnitude precision and does not use compar- ison stars or flat-fielding for calibration. There is no di- rect connection to any photometric system. Tracking jit- ter was dramatically reduced early in 2004 to ∼1 arcsec which, subsequently, led to significantly higher photo- metric precision. The observations reported here were reduced by RK. Outlying data points generated by poor tracking or cos- mic ray hits were removed. At certain orbital phases, MOST suffers from parasitic light, mostly Earthshine, the amount and phase depending on the stellar coor- dinates, spacecraft roll and season of the year. Data are recorded for seven Fabry images adjacent to the tar- get to track the background. The background signals were combined in a mean and subtracted from the tar- get photometry. This procedure also corrected for bias, dark and background signals and their variations. Re- ductions basically followed the scheme already outlined by Rucinski et al. (2004). A log of the MOST observations of κ1 Ceti for each of 2003, 2004 and 2005 is given in Table 1. For the light curve analysis in this paper, data were binned at the MOST orbital period of 101.413 min. Figure 1 dis- plays full light curves for each of the three years with time given as JD-2451545 (heliocentric). The solid line in the lower panel displays the difference between the two most divergent background readings from the seven background Fabry images. There is no obvious corre- lation between structure in the differential background signal and the light curve. The complete light curve can be downloaded from the MOST Public Archive at www.astro.ubc.ca/MOST. The formal rms point-to-point precison, σ, is given in Table 1. The shapes of the light curves ultimately used for the StarSpotz analysis depend to a degree on just how the background is removed. Despite having the summed signal values from 7 adjacent Fabry images we cannot interpolate a 'true' background but subtraction of the mean background is a consistent option. In each of the three data sets used here the 7 background values are closely identical when averaged over an orbit but the dif- ferences between the extreme backgrounds can be signif- icant when the ambient background is high (eg. pointing close to the Moon) which is why that difference is shown in the lower panel for each light curve. We have assumed that the true errors in the individ- ual orbital means making up each light curve are pro- portional to the difference between the maximum and minimum background values. These errors have been arbitrarily scaled by one-fourth for the formal StarSpotz analysis and these 'errors' are shown as bars in Figures 4, 5, and 6. The individual bars correspond approximately to the standard deviation of the background. 3. STARSPOTZ StarSpotz (Croll et al. 2006b) is a program based on SPOTMODEL (Rib´arik et al. 2003; Rib´arik 2002), that is designed to provide a graphical user interface for pho- tometric spot modeling. The functionality included in StarSpotz is designed to take advantage of the nearly continuous photometry returned by MOST to quantify the non-uniqueness problem often associated with pho- tometric spot modeling. Basically, StarSpotz uses the analytic models of Budding (1977) or Dorren (1987) to model the drop in intensity caused by NSP OT circular, non-overlapping spots. The model proposed in Budding (1977) is used in this application. Fitting can be performed by a variety of methods in- cluding a Marquardt-Levenberg non-linear least squares algorithm (Marquardt 1963; Levenberg 1944; Press et al. 1992), or Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) function- ality (Gregory 2005b; Gamerman et al. 1999; Gilks et al. 1996). The parameters of interest are the stellar incli- nation angle, i, the unspotted intensity of the star, U , and the period, epoch, latitude and angular size of the ath spot: pa, Ea, βa, and γa. Croll et al. (2006b) have demonstrated how the Marquardt-Levenberg non-linear least squares algorithm could be used to fit the cycle to cycle variation in ǫ Eri. Croll (2006a) investigated the same observations of ǫ Eri demonstrating that Markov Chain Monte Carlo functionality is very helpful in defin- ing correlations and possible degeneracies between the fitted parameters. The search for additional local minima in χ2 space indi- cating other plausible spot configurations that produce a reasonable fit to the light-intensity curve is an important part of the modeling because it allows one to quantify the uniqueness of a solution. We argue that this task Differential rotation of κ1 Ceti 3 TABLE 1 MOST Observations of κ1 Ceti year start dates HJD -- 2451545 2003 5 Nov 2004 15 Oct 2005 14 Oct 1403.461 to 1433.901 1748.578 to 1768.989 2112.721 to 2125.065 total days 30.44 20.41 12.34 duty cycle % 96 99 83 exp sec cycle sec mmag σa 40 30 30 50 35 35 0.5 0.30 0.19 a for data binned at the MOST orbital period of 101.413 min. of completely searching parameter space for other phys- ically plausible local minima is better suited to a pro- cess called parallel tempering (Gregory 2005a; Gregory 2005b), discussed here in §4.2, rather than the Unique- ness test methods in Croll et al. (2006b). The present and subsequent releases of the freely avail- able program StarSpotz, including the full source-code, executable, and documentation are available at: www.astro.ubc.ca/MOST/StarSpotz.html Release 3.0 includes the functionality discussed which allows one to fit multiple epochs of data as well as the parallel tempering functionality. 4. THE SPOTS ON κ1 CETI As the MOST observations of κ1 Ceti come from three well-seperated epochs with independent starspot groups from epoch to epoch, the fitting process was consider- ably more complicated than those detailed in Croll et al. (2006b) and Croll (2006a). Rather than fitting for the pe- riod, p, of the individual spots in each epoch we derive a common equatorial period, PEQ, and the differential ro- tation coefficient, k, among the three epochs where these are given by: Pβ = PEQ/(1 − k sin2β) (1) where Pβ is the period at latitude β. There are five fewer parameters to be fitted because the periods of the in- dividual spots are no longer independent variables, but completely defined by k, PEQ, and β. Analyses of so- lar differential rotation usually include terms in sin4β (Kitchatinov 2005) but we did not expect to detect spots at such high latitudes where this term would be impor- tant. Common limb-darkening coefficients, u = 0.684, and flux ratios between the spot and unspotted photosphere, κω = 0.22 were assumed. The former was based on the compilations of D´ıaz-Cordov´es et al. (1995), while the latter comes from the canonical value for sunspots (Tspot ∼ 4000 K, Tphot ∼ 5800 K). The 27 parameters to be fitted are summarized in Table 2. Initial investigations of the light curves using the StarSpotz standard spot model indicated that different numbers of spots were required for the various epochs. The 2003 and 2005 MOST data-sets could be well ex- plained by two starspots rotating with different periods, at different latitudes. The behaviour observed in the 2004 MOST light curve, on the other hand, required a third spot. Thus the following analysis explicitly assumes two, three and two starspots for the 2003-2005 MOST epochs, respectively. In this present application we use the same paradigm that was applied to κ1 Ceti by Rucinski et al. (2004), and ǫ Eri by Croll (2006a) and Croll et al. (2006b) where the spot parameters (E, β, γ) were assumed to be constant throughout the observations, and that the cycle-to-cycle variability observed is due solely to spots rotating dif- ferentially. Other interpretations are certainly plausible including circular spots with time-varying spot sizes and latitudes such as those applied to IM Peg in Rib´arik et al. (2003). The Maximum Entropy & Tikhonov reconstruc- tion technique of Lanza et al. (1998), which assumes pixellated spots of various contrasts, is another example. We feel that with the limitations of photometric spot modeling, our assumption of unchanging spot parame- ters is the most suitable for the timescale of the MOST light curves. It provides an opportunity to determine a unique solution, as well as recovering astrophysically important parameters. We recognise, given the obvious changes in the κ1 Ceti light curve over a year, that the assumption of spot parameters constancy over a few weeks is a simplifica- tion but we do not expect significant spot migration on timescales of less than a month. 4.1. StarSpotz Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) functionality The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) functional- ity used in StarSpotz is fully described in Croll (2006a). The goal is to take an n-step intelligent random walk around the parameter space of interest while recording the point in parameter space for each of the K fitted parameters for each step. This samples the posterior parameter distribution, which can be thought of in pho- tometric spot modeling as simply the range in each of the K fitted parameters that provide a reasonable fit to the light curve. The advantage of a MCMC is that it does not simply follow the path of steepest descent - resulting in the possibility that it becomes stuck in a local minimum - but allows the MCMC to fully explore the immediate parameter space. The K parameters can thus be defined by a K dimensional vector y. T stands for the "virtual temperature" and determines the probability that the MCMC chain will accept large deviations to higher regions in χ2 space (Sajina et al. 2006). The virtual temperature should properly be unity (T = 1) to sample the posterior parameter distribution when reduced χ2 is near unity. However, in photomet- ric spot modeling, nature is often more complicated than one's model can take into account, resulting in anoma- lously high reduced χ2 values. Setting T to be the mini- mum reduced χ2 value observed produces the same effect 4 Walker et al. as scaling reduced χ2 to one, and thus effectively sam- ples the posterior parameter distribution. In this present application Tmin will refer to this value of T equal to the minimum reduced χ2 observed. A suitable burn-in period as described in Croll (2006a) is often used, or a χ2 cut where points with χ2 values above this user-specified minimum are excised from the analysis. A user-specified thinning factor, f , (Croll 2006a) is also used. To ensure proper conver- gence and mixing we employ the tests as proposed by Gelman and Rubin (1992) and explicitly defined for our purposes in Croll (2006a). We ensure the vector R falls as close to 1.0 as possible for each of the K fitted parameters. The marginalized likelihood (Sajina et al. 2006; Lewis and Bridle 2002) as described in §3.1 of Croll (2006a) is used to define our 68% credible regions, while the mean likelihood (Sajina et al. 2006) is used for com- parison. The mean likelihood is produced using the χ2 values in a particular bin of a histogram of parameter values, while the marginalized likelihood directly reflects the fraction of times that the MCMC chains are in a particular bin. Peaks in the marginalized likelihood that are inconsistent with peaks in the mean likelihood can be indicative of the chains having yet to converge, or larger multidimensional parameter space rather than a better fit (Lewis and Bridle 2002). In our analysis we quote the minimum to maximum range of the 68% credible regions. 4.2. Parallel Tempering Gregory (2005a) applied parallel tempering to a radial velocity search for extrasolar planets, as the parameter space he investigated had widely seperated regions in pa- rameter space that provided a reasonable fit to the data. In our application as we fit for a large number of param- eters, K=27, we use parallel tempering to explore our multi-dimensional parameter space and search for other local minima in χ2 space indicative of other plausible so- lutions, and thus starspot configurations, that produce a reasonable fit to the light-intensity curve. In parallel tempering, MP multiple MCMC chains are run simultaneously each with different values of the vir- tual temperature, Tm, where m is an index that runs from 1 to MP . Chains with higher values of T are easily able to jump to radically different areas in pa- rameter space ensuring that the chain does not become stuck in a local minimum. Chains with lower values of T can refine themselves and descend into local minima and possibly the global minimum in χ2 space (Gregory 2005a). The chain with T = 1.0×Tmin is the target dis- tribution and is referred to as the "cold sampler." The parameters of the "cold sampler" are used for analysis to return the posterior parameter distribution. A set mean fraction of the time, l, a proposal is made for the parameters y of adjacent chains to be exchanged. If this proposal is accepted than adjacent chains are cho- sen at random and the K parameters y for each chain are exchanged. In this way, this method allows radi- cally different areas in parameter space to be investi- gated in the high temperature chains, before reaching the "cold sampler" where a local minimum can be sought efficiently. We run 11 parallel chains with virtual temper- atures, Tm, of: T = {100×Tmin, 50.0×Tmin, 33.0×Tmin , 3.00×Tmin, 2.00×Tmin, 1.50×Tmin 1.25×Tmin, 1.00×Tmin }. 20.0×Tmin, 10.0×Tmin, 5.0×Tmin, In a typical parallel tempering scheme the number of iterations between swap proposals is set to some con- stant integer, B (e.g. B ≈ 10). With the large number of parameters being fitted across the three epochs of data (K=27) in the current application, it was found that this typical scheme was not able to efficiently reach the low-χ2 valleys in the multi-dimensional parameter space indica- tive of a reasonable fit to the light-intensity curve. Thus the number of iterations between swap proposals, Bm, was set to a variable number between the chains. Bm was set to a larger number for the lower temperature chains to allow these chains a greater number of itera- tions to refine themselves and explore the low-χ2 areas. This was found to be a suitable compromise as the higher virtual temperature chains required fewer iterations to reach radically different areas of parameter space, while the lower virtual temperature chains required nearly an order of magnitude more iterations to reach lower ar- eas in χ2 space indicative of reasonable fits to the light- curve. The number of chain points per chain was set to B = {Bmin, Bmin, Bmin, Bmin, Bmin, Bmin, Bmin, 2.0×Bmin, 2.0×Bmin, 3.0×Bmin, 4.0×Bmin}. Bmin was set to twenty (Bmin=20), within an order of magnitude of the value proposed by Gregory (2005a); extensive tests have proven this choice to be reasonable. l was set as 0.80 to allow for exchanges between adjacent MCMC chains on average 80% percent of the time. That means a swap is approved if ul < l, where ul is a random number (ul ǫ[0, 1]). Significant experimentation was needed to choose and refine suitable choices of Tm, Bm, Bmin, and l. In the present application we start 8×11 of these par- allel tempering chains starting from random points in our acceptable parameter space as given in the Paral- lel Tempering initial allowed range column of Table 2. MCMC fitting was then implemented for n=4000 steps to ensure that the starting point for the parallel tem- pering chains provided a mediocre fit to the light curve. A mediocre fit was desired to ensure that the starting point for the parallel tempering chains provided a rea- sonable fit to the light curve so as to reduce the required burn-in period, while not starting from within a signifi- cant local minimum so as to allow the parallel tempering chains to efficiently explore the parameter space. Each of these 8×11 MCMC parallel tempering chains were then run for nx=13000 exchanges, resulting in nx×20×4 = 1.04×106 total steps for each of the 8 "cold samplers." A burn-in period was not used in this application for our analysis. Rather a χ2 cut was used where all points of the parallel tempering "cold samplers" with reduced χ2 greater than some particular minimum, χ2 CU T , were ex- cised from the analysis. This serves a similar function to a burn-in period for the initial points, while allowing the analysis to focus on the chain points that provide a rea- sonable fit to the light curve. Given the large number of parameters we fit for, K=27, this is useful as the paral- lel tempering chains spend an inordinate amount of time exploring parameter spaces that do not provide a good Differential rotation of κ1 Ceti 5 fit to the data, and would otherwise complicate the anal- ysis. A thinning factor, f , of 20 were used in all chains for the parallel tempering analysis. The 8×11 parallel tempering chains required a total computational time of 7.0 CPU days on a Pentium processor with a clock speed of 3.2 Ghz with 1.0 GB of memory. This value of nx was chosen to ensure that the vector R, in this case RP arallel (Gelman and Rubin 1992; Croll 2006a), fell as close to 1.0 as possible for each of the K = 27 parameters. R < ≈1.3 signifies that the chain points have roughly con- verged and thus we are close to an equilibrium distribu- tion. To determine RP arallel we do not use the above χ2 cut but instead use a burn-in period of nburn = 30000 steps. This is because we are interested in ensuring the parallel tempering chains have converged while exploring our parameter space as a whole, rather than the narrow region of parameter space signifying the global χ2 mini- mum. Analysis of these 8 "cold samplers" is given below in §4.2.1. 4.2.1. κ1 Ceti Parallel Tempering results The Parallel Tempering results as applied to MOST's 2003-2005 observations of κ1 Ceti indicated that there is a single unique solution to the data-set that provides the best fit. Following the nx=13000 exchanges as described above the vector RP arallel was investigated for each of the K=27 parameters. It was found that RP arallel fell below 1.6 for all parameters, and RP arallel fell below 1.3 for most parameters. These low values of RP arallel indi- cate adequate convergence has been obtained. Each of the components of the vector RP arallel are given in Table 2. These low values for all the K parameters of RP arallel indicate that our parallel tempering chains have approxi- mately converged to an equilibrium, and adequately sam- pled the realistic parameter space. For our analysis we set Tmin as 2.96 as it is the global minimum observed in the below section (§4.3) and a re- duced χ2 CU T of 3.38 as it was judged this was reasonably close to the global χ2 minimum to focus the analysis ex- clusively on the solutions that provided a reasonable fit to the light curve. Our 68% credible regions are given by the marginalized likelihood following the χ2 cut. The immediate parameter space indicated by these results are given in Table 3. This parameter space was thus worthy of more detailed investigation to explore this χ2 global minimum, as well as to define best-fit values and appro- priate uncertainties for the fitted and derived parameters of interest. Also, possible correlations between the fitted parameters were investigated for. Detailed investigation of the parallel tempering results indicate that all other local minima produce significantly worse fits to the data-sets. The only minor exception indicated by the parallel tempering results is that the second spot in the 2003 epoch can also be found at a latitude, β2003 2, in the southern hemisphere as well as the northern hemisphere. Detailed investigation indicate that the northern hemisphere solution provides a signif- icantly better fit and thus is the solution that will be investigated. Given the fact that all other local minima have been ruled out, and the low values of RP arallel for all K parameters, we feel fully justified in stating that this parameter space is the unique realistic solution to the observed light curve given our assumptions. 4.3. κ1 Ceti MCMC application In §4.2 we demonstrated that the solution presented is unique for the 2003-2005 MOST epochs under the k, PEQ, paradigm. Thus we used the MCMC methods dis- cussed in Croll (2006a) and summarized above in §4.1 to investigate possible correlations and derive best-fit values and uncertainties in the fitted and derived parameters for κ1 Ceti. We used M =4 chains starting from reasonably different points in parameter space, although within the local χ2 minimum that defined the parameter space of interest of §4.2. The prior ranges are given in Table 2. The choices in prior are identical to those used for the Parallel Tempering section except a slightly more con- servative range is used for the inclination angle, 30o < i < 80o, to limit the MCMC chain to a realistic parameter space. We run each of the M =4 chains for n=7.0×106 steps, requiring a total computational time of 8.0 CPU days on the aforementioned processor. This large value of n was motivated to ensure that the R vector, in this case RM CM C , fell below 1.20 for all K=27 parameters, and fell below 1.05 for most parameters, indicative of suitable convergence. The values of each of the K components of RM CM C are given in Table 2. The results of this analysis, henceforth referred to as Solution 1, can be seen in Figures 2 and 3, and are sum- marized in Table 3. As one might expect, especially given the similar results of ǫ Eri (Croll 2006a), the latitudes of the various spots are moderately correlated with the inclination angle of the system, i. However, the differen- tial rotation coefficient, k, is largely uncorrelated with i. This is in stark contrast to the results of ǫ Eri where the correlation of spot latitude with i produced a moderate correlation between k and i. Our derived value of k = 0.085 - 0.096 is therefore very robust as it is does not require an independent estimate of i. It is important to note, though, that the 2003 and 2005 MOST data-sets do not severely limit the allowed best- fit range of the differential rotation coefficient, k. The 2003 and 2005 MOST data-sets were best-fit with spots that were not widely seperated in latitude, and thus these epochs contributed only marginally to the determination of the differential rotation coefficient. The 2004 MOST data-set most severely limited the best-fit range of the differential rotation coefficient, as it required three spots ranging in latitude from the mid-southern hemisphere, to the equator, to near the north pole. Also, although we have used a relatively liberal flat prior on the stellar inclination angle, i, of 30o < i < 80o, the value of i returned from our fit gives vsini = 4.64 - 4.94 km s−1, entirely consistent with the spectro- scopic value of vsini = 4.64 ± 0.11 km s−1 determined by Rucinski et al. (2004) from the width of the Ca II K-line reversals. This agreement is a very useful sanity check and gives us great confidence that our fitted results and our assumptions of circular spots are in close agreement with the actual behaviour of the star during these three epochs. The minimum χ2 point observed in our MCMC chains 6 Walker et al. κ1 Ceti MCMC fitted parameters TABLE 2 parameter prior allowed range Parallel Tempering RP arallel RM CM C initial allowed range i (o) k PEQ (d) U2003 E2003 1 (JD-2451545) β2003 1 (o) γ2003 1 (o) E2003 2 (JD-2451545) β2003 2 (o) γ2003 2 (o) U2004 E2004 1 (JD-2451545) β2004 1 (o) γ2004 1 (o) E2004 2 (JD-2451545) β2004 2 (o) γ2004 2 (o) E2004 3 (JD-2451545) β2004 3 (o) γ2004 3 (o) U2005 E2005 1 (JD-2451545) β2005 1 (o) γ2005 1 (o) E2005 2 (JD-2451545) β2005 2 (o) γ2005 2 (o) 25 - 85, 30 - 80 a −0.75 - 0.75 8.0 - 10.5 0.99 - 1.01 1409.0 - 1413.0 −90 - 90 0.0 - 30 1404.0 - 1408.0 −90 - 90 0.0 - 30 0.99 - 1.015 1754.7 - 1758.7 −90 - 90 0.0 - 30 1761.5 - 1765.5 −90 - 90 0.0 - 30 1767.1 - 1771.1 −90 - 90 0.0 - 30 0.99 - 1.01 2115.0 - 2119.0 −90 - 90 0.0 - 30 2118.1 - 2122.1 −90 - 90 0.0 - 30 25 - 85 −0.6 - 0.6 8.0 - 10.5 1.000 1409.0 - 1413.0 −10.0 - 60.0 4.0 - 8.0 1404.0 - 1408.0 −10.0 - 60.0 4.0 - 8.0 1.000 1754.7 - 1758.7 −10.0 - 60.0 2.5 - 6.0 1761.5 - 1765.5 −10.0 - 60.0 2.5 - 6.0 1767.1 - 1771.1 −10.0 - 60.0 2.5 - 6.0 1.000 2115.0 - 2119.0 −10.0 - 60.0 4.0 - 8.0 2118.1 - 2122.1 −10.0 - 60.0 4.0 - 8.0 1.033 1.443 1.477 1.415 1.338 1.144 1.110 1.051 1.548 1.312 1.318 1.179 1.338 1.126 1.391 1.596 1.209 1.079 1.490 1.237 1.235 1.182 1.249 1.122 1.289 1.074 1.057 1.010 1.053 1.012 1.024 1.006 1.023 1.031 1.009 1.026 1.026 1.124 1.004 1.013 1.022 1.005 1.098 1.100 1.039 1.042 1.035 1.179 1.057 1.059 1.070 1.038 1.072 1.092 a The left hand values were used for the parallel tempering application (§4.2.1), while the values on the right were used for the MCMC application (§4.3). is also quoted in Table 3. The fit to the light curves in 2003, 2004, 2005 and the views of the modelled spots shown from the line of sight (LOS) of this minimum χ2 solution are given in Figures 4, 5, and 6. Our current results are largely consistent with the anal- ysis of the 2003 MOST data by Rucinski et al. (2004) as can be seen in the comparison given in Table 3. The only discrepancies of note are that our MCMC analysis indicates a slightly smaller value of the inclination an- gle, i = 57.8 − 63.5o, and that we find a shorter period of the 2nd spot, p2003 2 = 9.022 − 9.094 d. The period found by Rucinski et al. (2004) for the 2nd spot depends on effective removal of the variations caused by the larger spot and it was not possible to asssign a reliable latitude. They also asumed that the spots were black making them smaller than those in this paper. Differential rotation of κ1 Ceti 7 4.4. κ1 Ceti 2004 Parallel Tempering and MCMC application Given the good agreement of the MOST 2003, 2004 and 2005 κ1 Ceti observations with the assumed solar- type differential rotation profile in Equation 1 and sum- marized in Figure 7, we decided to test independently whether solar-type differential rotation is indeed present in κ1 Ceti. The 2004 light curve was chosen because, as noted above, it constrained the equatorial period, PEQ, and differential rotation coefficient, k, more significantly than the light curves from the other two years. For this independent test we fitted explicitly for the periods of each of the three spots: p2004 1, p2004 2, and p2004 3. The K=13 fitted parameters are summarized in Table 4. For these we used the same priors, and for the parallel tempering chains we started from the same ran- dom ranges in parameter space, as summarized in Table 2. We assumed i= 60.6o corresponding to the minimum χ2 value found above. This assumption for the inclina- tion angle is justified because it results in vsini = 4.77km s−1(assuming PEQ ≈ 8.78), a value close to the spectro- scopic value measured by Rucinski et al. (2004). Parallel tempering as described in §4.2 was used to find the unique global minimum. Starting from random points in acceptable parameter space we implemented MCMC fitting for n=3000 steps to ensure a mediocre fit to the light curve. Parallel tempering chains were then implemented with nx=1800 exchanges resulting in 144000 steps for each of the 8 "cold samplers". We used a burn-in period of the first 5000 steps to determine the R vector, in this case R2004 P arallel. All K=13 parameters of R2004 P arallel fell below 1.4, and below 1.2 for most, as summarized in Table 4. Analysis is performed using a Tmin of 1.50 and a reduced χ2 CU T of 2.0. The parallel tempering results identify a unique global minimum as summarized in Table 4, that is nearly identical to Solu- tion 1 as summarized above in §4.3 and Table 3. Thus after using parallel tempering to identify the unique global minimum, we explored this parameter space with our MCMC techniques as described above in §4.1 and §4.3. We use n=3.7×106 steps, and then use a burn-in period of 1000 steps to determine the R vec- tor (in this case R2004 M CM C fell below 1.02 for all K=13 parameters as summarized in Table 4, and thus demonstrated more than adequate convergence. Our MCMC results are also summarized in Table 4. M CM C ). The parameters of R2004 As summarized in the bottom-panel of Figure 7 these results indicate that the 2004 MOST data-set provides a strong independent argument that solar-type differential rotation pattern defined by Equation 1 has been observed in κ1 Ceti. Using only the 2004 data-set the values of the differential rotation coefficient, and equatorial period are: k = 0.092 - 0.101, and PEQ = 8.65 - 8.72d. These values were determined by averaging for each point of the MCMC chains the three possible k and PEQ values, between spots 1 & 2, 1 & 3, and 2 & 3. 5. DISCUSSION The MCMC Solution 1 in Table 3 provides our best values for the various spot and stellar parameters. The solutions are expressed by the 68% credible ranges rather than best values with standard deviations since the like- lihood histograms are non-gaussian. Figure 7 is a good summary of our analysis. The periods and β 68% marginalized contours are shown for each of the spots to- gether with mean and limiting curves for k (0.090, 0.085, 0.096) and the range of PEQ (8.77, 8.74, 8.81d). Each of the three years is distinguished by a different color. β ranges from 10◦ and 75◦ with the 2004 data obvi- ously providing the most rigorous constraint on k. In- deed, it demonstrates that Rucinski et al. (2004) had a most challenging task in demonstrating differential ro- tation because the spots in 2003 were at very similar latitudes with the second spot being particularly small. The analysis defined k using Equation 1 which is de- rived from the solar pattern. The agreement of all seven spots with the form of the k curve as well as the good agreement of the spot solutions in Figures 5, 6 and 7 sug- gests that the the differential rotation curve for κ1 Cet is closely similar to solar. The analysis of the 2004 light curve independently of any assumption about k offers strong confirmation that the pattern is indeed solar. For the Sun, k has been derived quite inde- pendently from either sunspot latitudes and periods (Newton and Nunn 1951) or surface radial velocities (Howard et al. 1983) yielding k = 0.19 and 0.12, respc- tively (Kitchatinov 2005). The large discrepancy be- tween these values may be related in part to the different behavior of sunspot and photospheric motions. In our case, we depend on spots to determine k and our value of 0.09 is significantly lower than either of those for the Sun. This is in line with calculations by Brown et al. (2004) who find that k should increase with age. Gudel et al. (1997) estimated an age of 750 Myr for κ1 Cet from their estimated 9.2 d rotation period. Our value of PEQ = 8.77 d suggests a still younger age. All of the photometric periods found to date for κ1 Cet can be explained by spots appearing at different lati- tudes. A period of 9.09 d is given in the Hipparcos cat- alog (ESA 1997) while Messina & Guinan (2002) quote a value of 9.214 d. Baliunas et al. (1995) monitored Ca II H & K photoelectrically between 1967 and 1991 and found a rotational period of 9.4 ± 0.1 d (Baliunas et al. 1983) and Shkolnik et al. (2003) found a closely simi- lar period of ∼9.3 d mostly from spectra taken in 2002. While the apparent persistance of this period which cor- responds to a range of 50◦ to 60◦ in latitude for some 35 years maybe fortuitous, it might be related to some large scale magnetic structure. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Coun- cil of Canada supports the research of B.C., D.B.G., J.M.M., A.F.J.M., S.M.R., G.A.H.W.. Additional sup- port for A.F.J.M. comes from FCAR (Qu´ebec). R.K. is supported by the Canadian Space Agency. W.W.W. is supported by the Austrian Space Agency and the Aus- trian Science Fund (P14984). 8 Walker et al. κ1 Ceti MCMC fitted parameters TABLE 3 parameter fitted Rucinski 2004 results Parallel Tempering Minimum χ2 results solution MCMC Solution 1 Reduced χ2 ν a i (o) k PEQ vsini (km s−1) c equatorial speed (km s−1) c u κω U2003 E2003 1 (JD-2451545) p2003 1 (days) β2003 1 (o) γ2003 1 (o) E2003 2 (JD-2451545) p2003 2 (days) β2003 2 (o) γ2003 2 (o) U2004 E2004 1 (JD-2451545) p2004 1 (days) β2004 1 (o) γ2004 1 (o) E2004 2 (JD-2451545) p2004 2 (days) β2004 2 (o) γ2004 2 (o) E2004 3 (JD-2451545) p2004 3 (days) β2004 3 (o) γ2004 3 (o) U2005 E2005 1 (JD-2451545) p2005 1 (days) β2005 1 (o) γ2005 1 (o) E2005 2 (JD-2451545) p2005 2 (days) β2005 2 (o) γ2005 2 (o) n/a n/a yes yes yes derived derived assumed assumed yes yes derived yes yes yes - - 70 ± 4 - - 4.64 ± 0.11 b - 0.80 0.00 - - 8.9 ± 0.1 d 40 ± 7 11.1 ± 0.6 3.145 - 3.374 817 44.9 - 74.1 0.094 - 0.117 8.71 - 8.90 3.83 - 5.34 5.40 - 5.53 0.6840 0.220 0.9964 - 1.0031 1410.94 - 1410.97 8.978 - 9.007 16.7 - 36.9 11.05 - 11.93 2.936 817 60.6 0.087 8.784 4.77 5.47 0.684 0.220 1.0011 1410.93 9.008 32.4 11.75 2.968- 3.018 817 57.8 - 63.5 0.085 - 0.096 8.74 - 8.81 4.64 - 4.94 5.46 - 5.50 0.684 0.220 1.0003 - 1.0017 1410.92 - 1410.94 8.990 - 9.015 29.5 - 34.8 11.63 - 11.86 - 1405.85 - 1406.23 1406.10 1406.07 - 1406.16 derived 9.3 − 9.7 d yes yes yes yes derived yes yes yes derived yes yes yes derived yes yes yes yes derived yes yes yes derived yes yes - - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.948 - 9.160 -45.7 - 58.9 5.08 - 9.41 1.0025 - 1.0092 1756.69 - 1756.78 8.721 - 8.939 -0.8 - 15.0 7.17 - 8.51 9.070 37.2 5.95 1.0149 1756.68 8.820 12.7 7.99 9.022 - 9.094 32.9 - 39.8 5.68 - 6.18 1.0129 - 1.0150 1756.66 - 1756.70 8.787 - 8.851 9.3 - 16.8 7.73 - 8.09 1763.53 - 1763.65 1763.54 1763.49 - 1763.56 9.039 - 9.316 -43.9 - -28.7 7.14 - 19.21 1769.01 - 1769.32 9.572 - 9.751 59.2 - 76.9 7.53 - 13.23 1.0000 - 1.0053 2116.96 - 2117.09 9.340 - 9.419 41.8 - 63.0 8.30 - 9.37 2120.09 - 2120.21 9.094 - 9.253 28.0 - 56.0 7.69 - 8.31 9.200 -46.3 16.76 1769.09 9.572 77.3 13.04 1.0042 2116.94 9.372 58.4 9.74 9.153 - 9.231 -47.6 - -43.2 14.44 - 17.31 1769.03 - 1769.16 9.542 - 9.640 74.9 - 78.4 11.60 - 13.53 1.0029 - 1.0051 2116.95 - 2117.05 9.365 - 9.423 55.4 - 62.1 9.24 - 10.28 2120.22 2120.21 - 2120.30 9.248 49.6 8.55 9.166 - 9.252 42.9 - 50.1 7.94 - 8.52 a ν is the number of binned data points minus the number of fitted parameters. b spectroscopic value from Rucinski et al. (2004), not derived photometrically. c These values determined using R∗ = 0.95 RJ. d This parameter fitted, rather than derived (Rucinski et al. 2004). REFERENCES Baliunas, S.L., Donahue, R.A., Soon, W.H., Horne, J.H., Frazer, J., Woodard-Eklund, L., Bradford, M., Rao, L.M., Wilson, O.C., Zhang, Q., Bennett, W., Briggs, J., Carroll, S.M., Duncan, D.K., Figueroa, D., Lanning, H.H., Misch, T., Mueller, J., Noyes, R.W., Poppe, D., Porter, A.C., Robinson, C.R., Russell, J., Shelton, J.C., Soyumer, T., Vaughan, A.H., Whitney, J.H., 1995, ApJ, 438, 269 Baliunas, S.L., Hartmann, L., Noyes, R.W., Vaughan, H., Preston, G.W., Frazer, J., Lanning, H., Middelkoop, F., Mihalas, S., 1983, ApJ, 275, 752 Brown, B. P., Browning, M. K., Brun, A. S., Toomre, J. 2004, Proceedings of the SOHO 14 / GONG 2004 Workshop (ESA SP-559). "Helio- and Asteroseismology: Towards a Golden Future". 12-16 July, 2004. New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Editor: D. Danesy., p.341 Brun A.S., Toomre J. 2002, ApJ, 570, 865 Budding, E. 1977, Ap&SS, 48, 207 Collier Cameron, A. 2002, Astron. Nachr., 323, 336 Croll, B. 2006, PASP, accepted 18 July Croll, B., Walker, G. A. H., Kuschnig, R., Matthews, J.M., Rowe, J.F., Walker, A., Rucinski, S.M., Hatzes, A.P., Cochran, W.D., Robb, R.M., Guenther, D.B., Moffat, A.F.J., Sasselov, D., Weiss, W.W., 2006, ApJ, 648, 607 D´ıaz-Cordov´es, J., Claret, A., Gimin´enez, A. 1995, Ap&SS, 110, 329 Dorren, J.D. 1987, ApJ, 320, 756 European Space Agency. 1997. The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA SP-1200)(Noordwijk: ESA) (HIP) Gamerman D., 1997, Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference, Chapman and Hall, London Gelman, A., Rubin, D.B. 1992, Statistical Science, 7(4), 457 Gilks, W.R., Richardson, S., Spiegelhalter, D.J., 1996, Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Champan and Hall, London Gregory, P.C. 2005a, ApJ, 631, 1198 Differential rotation of κ1 Ceti 9 κ1 Ceti 2004 MCMC fitted parameters TABLE 4 parameter fitted Reduced χ2 ν a i (o) k vsini (km s−1) b PEQ u κω U2004 E2004 1 (JD-2451545) p2004 1 (days) β2004 1 (o) γ2004 1 (o) E2004 2 (JD-2451545) p2004 2 (days) β2004 2 (o) γ2004 2 (o) E2004 3 (JD-2451545) p2004 3 (days) β2004 3 (o) γ2004 3 (o) n/a n/a assumed derived derived derived assumed assumed yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes R2004 P arallel Parallel Tempering R2004 results M CM C n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.122 1.110 1.127 1.183 1.092 1.315 1.279 1.162 1.074 1.034 1.102 1.203 1.127 1.50 - 1.82 269 60.6 0.095 - 0.111 4.80 - 4.86 8.624 - 8.721 0.6840 0.220 1.0051 - 1.0150 1756.66 - 1756.74 8.704 - 8.773 9.1 - 22.3 7.51 - 7.80 1763.40 - 1763.50 9.050 - 9.162 -45.8 - -38.6 11.21 - 15.80 1768.94 - 1769.07 9.518 - 9.598 71.0 - 77.9 9.04 - 13.11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.011 1.001 1.003 1.003 1.002 1.000 1.002 1.013 1.016 1.002 1.000 1.003 1.003 MCMC Solution 1.46 - 1.52 269 60.6 0.092 - 0.101 4.80 - 4.84 8.65 - 8.72 0.684 0.220 1.0139 - 1.0150 1756.64 - 1756.68 8.736 - 8.788 15.6 - 21.7 7.64 - 7.84 1763.43 - 1763.49 9.112 - 9.183 -47.5 - -43.9 14.65 - 16.83 1768.97 - 1769.08 9.510 - 9.579 76.6 - 78.0 12.64 - 13.17 a ν is the number of binned data points minus the number of fitted parameters. b These values determined using R∗ = 0.95 RJ. Gregory, P.C. 2005b, Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with Mathematica Support (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press) Gudel, M., Guinan, E.F., & Skinner, S.L., 1997, ApJ, 483, 947 Hall, D.S. & Busby, M.R. 1990, in Active Close Binaries, NATO ASIC Proceedings 319, Nato Advance Study Institute, p. 377 Henry, G.W., Eaton, J.A., Hamer, J. & Hall, D.S. 1995, ApJS, 97, 513 Howard, R., Adkins, J.M., Boyden, J.E., Cragg, T.A., Gregory, T.S., Labonte, B.J., Padilla, S.P., Webster, L. 1983, Solar Phys. 83, 321 Kitchatinov, L.L. 2005, Physics - Uspekhi 48 (5), 449 Lanza, A. F., Catalano, S., Cutispoto, G., Pagano, I., Rodono, M., 1998, A&A, 332, 541 Lebedinskii, A.I. 1941, Astron. Zh., 18, 10 Levenberg, K., 1944, Quart. Appl. Math. 2, 164 Lewis, A., Bridle, S. 2002, PhRvD, 66, 103511 Marquardt, D.W., 1963, SIAM J. Appl. Math, 11, 431 Messina, S. & Guinan, E. F. 2002, A&A, 393, 225 Newton, H.W., Nunn, M.L. 1951, MNRAS, 111, 413 Ossendrijver, M. 2003, Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, Volume 11, Issue 4, 287 Press, W.H., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press) Rib´arik, G., 2002, Occasional Technical Notes from Konkoly Observatory No. 12, http://www.konkoly.hu/Mitteilungen/otn12.ps.Z Rib´arik, G., Ol´ah, K., Strassmeier, K. G. 2003, Astronomische Nachrichten, 324, 202 Rucinski, S.M., Walker, G. A. H., Matthews, J.M., Kuschnig, R., Shkolnik, E., Marchenko, S., Bohlender, D.A., Guenther, D. B., Moffat, A. F. J., Sasselov, D., Weiss, W. W. 2004, PASP, 116, 1093 Sajina, A., Scott, D., Dennefeld, M., Dole, H., Lacy, M., Lagache, G., astro-ph 0603614 Shkolnik, E., Walker, G.A.H., Bohlender, D.A., 2003, ApJ, 597,1092 Thompson, M.J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Miesch, M.S. 2003, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 41, 599 Walker, G.A.H., Matthews, J.M., Kuschnig, R., Johnson, R., Rucinski, S., Pazder, J., Burley, G., Walker, A., Skaret, K., Zee, R., Grocott, S., Carroll, K., Sinclair, P., Sturgeon, D., Harron, J., 2003a, PASP, 115, 1023 10 Walker et al. 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.01 0.00 2003 1405 1410 1415 1420 1425 1430 1435 2004 1745 1750 1755 1760 1765 1770 2005 2105 2110 2115 2125 HJD - 2451545 2120 2130 2135 i a n g s d e z i l l a m r o n Fig. 1. -- MOST light curves for κ1 Ceti from 2003, 2004, and 2005. The points are the mean signals from individual 101.413 min satellite orbits. The black connected symbols in the lower part of each panel are the the differences between the highest and lowest of 7 adjacent simultaneously recorded (background) Fabry images (see text). The 'dip' at 1762 in 2004 corresponds to a total eclipse of the Moon. Differential rotation of κ1 Ceti 11 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11 0.12 k 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 i 8.65 8.7 8.75 8.8 8.85 8.9 PEQ Fig. 2. -- The marginalized likelihood for each of the fitted parameters is shown by the thick curve. The thin dotted curve shows the mean likelihood. The best-fitting value (the peak of the distribution) and the 68% credible regions determined from the marginalized likelihood are shown by the solid vertical, and dashed vertical lines. The unusual spike in the mean likelihood curve for a low value of k in the k histogram is likely due to low numbers of statistics, as indicated by the negligible value of the marginal likelihood curve. 12 Walker et al. 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 i i i i 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 25 30 35 40 45 50 β20032 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 -52 -50 -48 -46 -44 -42 -40 -38 -36 β20042 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 45 50 55 60 65 70 β20051 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11 0.12 0.13 k i i i i 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 β20031 0 5 10 15 β20041 20 25 30 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 β20043 30 35 40 50 55 60 45 β20052 Fig. 3. -- The solid lines are the 68% and 95% credible regions of the marginalized likelihood for various parameters. The 68% mean likelihood credible regions are shown by dotted contours (see text). Obviously there is little correlation between k and i in the bottom right panel. Differential rotation of κ1 Ceti 13 1.000 0.995 0.990 0.985 0.980 0.975 0.970 0.965 0.960 0.955 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 -0.005 -0.010 -0.015 -0.020 1405.0 1410.0 1415.0 1420.0 HJD - 2451545 1425.0 1430.0 Fig. 4. -- The best-fitting two spot solution for κ1 Ceti in 2003 (rotating counter-clockwise from top) and seen from the line of sight at phases 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 (from left) of the first spot. Middle: the MOST light curve with errors (see text). The continuous line is the solution from the "Minimum χ2" column of Table 3. The dotted line indicates the unspotted normalized signal of the star (U =1.0011). Vertical dashed lines indicate phases 0.00, 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75. Bottom: residuals from the model on the same scale. l i a n g S d e z i l a m r o N 14 Walker et al. 1.015 1.010 1.005 1.000 0.995 0.990 0.985 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 -0.005 -0.010 -0.015 1750.0 1755.0 1760.0 HJD - 2451545 1765.0 Fig. 5. -- The best-fitting three spot solution for κ1 Ceti in 2004 (rotating counter-clockwise from top) and seen from the line of sight at phases 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 (from left) of the first spot. Middle: the MOST light curve with errors (see text). The continuous line is the solution from the "Minimum χ2" column of Table 3. The dotted line indicates the unspotted normalized signal of the star (U =1.0149). Vertical dashed lines indicate phases 0.00, 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75. Bottom: residuals from the model on the same scale. l i a n g S d e z i l a m r o N Differential rotation of κ1 Ceti 15 1.005 1.000 0.995 0.990 0.985 0.980 0.010 0.005 0.000 -0.005 -0.010 2112.0 2114.0 2116.0 2118.0 2120.0 2122.0 2124.0 2126.0 HJD - 2451545 Fig. 6. -- The best-fitting two spot solution for κ1 in Ceti 2005 (rotating counter-clockwise from top) and seen from the line of sight at phases 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 (from left) of the first spot. Middle: the MOST light curve with errors (see text). The continuous line is the solution from the "Minimum χ2" column of Table 3. The dotted line indicates the unspotted normalized signal of the star (U =1.0042). Vertical dashed lines indicate phases 0.00, 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75. Bottom: residuals from the model on the same scale. l i a n g S d e z i l a m r o N 16 Walker et al. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 8.6 8.8 9 9.2 p (days) 9.4 9.6 9.8 0 10 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 β (o) β (o) 8.6 8.8 9 9.2 p (days) 9.4 9.6 9.8 0 10 Fig. 7. -- Top: The 68 % marginalized likelihood contours for the modulus of the latitude, β, and spot period are shown by dots for each spot -- 2003 (green), 2004 (blue) and 2005 (pink). The central red curve is the solar-period, latitude relation (Equation 1) with the mean values taken from Solution 1 of Table 3, k = 0.090 and PEQ = 8.77d. The other two red lines correspond to k = 0.085, PEQ = 8.74d, and k = 0.096, PEQ = 8.81d. The vertical dashed lines indicate the range of rotational periods (p = 9.4 ± 0.1 days) found in Ca II H & K line reversals over ∼30 years. Bottom: The 68 % marginalized likelihood contours for the 2004 data only (cyan) while fitting not for k and PEQ but explicitly for the periods, p2004 1, p2004 2, and p2004 3. The black curve is the best-fitting curve (k = 0.096 and PEQ = 8.68d) for the 2004 data, while the red curves are the same as in the upper panel. As can be seen, the black curve fits the data well and thus the observed differential rotation pattern is closely similar to solar.
astro-ph/0403478	1	0403	2004-03-19T15:48:58	Galaxy Kinematics with SALT	[ "astro-ph" ]	The combination of dynamical and photometric properties of galaxies offers a largely un-tapped source of information on how galaxies assembled and where stars formed. Bi-dimensional kinematic measurements have been the stumbling block. The light-gathering power of SALT coupled with the high-throughput performance of the Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph (PFIS) yield a superb facility for measuring velocity-ellipsoids of stars and gas in galaxies out to gigaparsec distances. From these data dynamical asymmetries arising from lopsided or elliptical halos may be probed; disk-mass and mass-decompositions may be uniquely determined; mechanisms for disk heating constrained; and a zeropoint for the mass-to-light ratios of stellar populations set. A number of groups within the SALT consortium are interested in making these measurements using a variety of different, but complementary approaches. The scientific potential from their synthesis is very promising. We describe some unusual observational modes in which PFIS may be used to probe the shape of dark-matter halos and the content of galaxy disks.	astro-ph	astro-ph	First Robert Stobie SALT Workshop Science with SALT Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2, 2004 D.A.H. Buckley Galaxy Kinematics with SALT M. A. Bershady1, M. A. W. Verheijen2, D. R. Andersen3, R. A. Swaters4, and K. B. Westfall1 1Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin -- Madison, 475 N. Charter St, Madison, WI 57306, USA 2Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, 14482, Potsdam, Germany 3Max Planck Institut fur Astronomie, Konigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 4Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA Abstract. The combination of dynamical and photometric properties of galaxies offers a largely un-tapped source of information on how galaxies assembled and where stars formed. Bi-dimensional kinematic measurements have been the stumbling block. The light-gathering power of SALT coupled with the high-throughput performance of the Prime Focus Imaging Spec- trograph (PFIS) yield a superb facility for measuring velocity-ellipsoids of stars and gas in galaxies out to gigaparsec distances. From these data dynamical asymmetries arising from lopsided or elliptical halos may be probed; disk-mass and mass-decompositions may be uniquely determined; mechanisms for disk heating constrained; and a zeropoint for the mass- to-light ratios of stellar populations set. A number of groups within the SALT consortium are interested in making these measurements using a variety of different, but complementary approaches. The scientific po- tential from their synthesis is very promising. We describe some unusual observational modes in which PFIS may be used to probe the shape of dark-matter halos and the content of galaxy disks. 1. Introduction Extant information about galaxies comes primarily from broad-band optical images. These deliver a wealth of information on when and where stars have formed. Missing is an accurate understanding of the distribution of mass and the details of its assembly -- knowledge which requires dynamical arguments substan- tiated with kinematic measurements. Hence kinematic information is essential for a basic understanding of galaxy formation and evolution. The last decade has seen the growth of bi-dimensional optical spectroscopy -- once the purview of radio (HI) observations. SALT can continue this development. With SALT's Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph we will be able to measure velocity-ellipsoid maps for a variety of dynamical tracers which include (collisionless) stellar pop- 1 2 Bershady et al. Figure 1. SparsePak (left, Bershady et al. 2003, 2004) and PPAK (right, Verheijen et al. 2004) IFUs, which respectively feed spectro- graphs on the WIYN and Calar Alto 3.5m telescopes, both capable of ∼11 km/s (σ) resolution. Units are presented at the same subtended angular scale at the telescope focal-plane; physical dimensions scale with respective telescope+fore-optic f -ratios. Light fibers transmit to the spectrograph; dark fibers serve as mechanical buffers. ulations and ('sticky') ionized gas. These measurements will be accessible via Fabry-Perot and dispersed spectroscopy over a very large (8′) field. As promising for SALT is the critical mass of consortium scientists with overlapping interests in galaxy dynamics (see, for example, contributions by Balona, Cecil, Cote, Crawford, Ferrarese, Sellwood, Sparke, Wilcots, Williams, and Ziegler in this volume). A few specific scientific prospects of interest to members of the consortium include (but are not limited to!) the frequency and amplitude of lopsided disks and triaxial halos as probed by dynamical and pho- tometric asymmetries; mergers and perturbations inferred studies of kinematic irregularities; disk heating mechanisms judged from velocity dispersion ellipsoids (σz/σR, Gerssen et al. 2000); feed-back processes in disks and the ISM; bar dy- namics and their pattern-speeds; the Tully-Fisher relation and its evolution; and direct dynamical mass decompositions determined by combining rotation curves with stellar velocity dispersions. Here we focus on how well we can directly separate disk from halo mass in spirals to yield dark-halo profiles, the zeropoint for stellar M/L ratio, and plau- sible constraints on the faint-end of the stellar IMF. These are of fundamental interest, respectively for testing both hierarchical cold-dark-matter structure- formation scenarios and star-formation models. This particular science case al- lows us to illustrate a novel application of PFIS to bi-dimensional spectroscopy with wide application. The concept combines narrow-band filters with dispersed spectroscopy to form what we call massively multi-plexed spectroscopy, or MMS. The approach complements other methods using fluid-dynamical modeling and kinematic measurements of barred potentials (Weiner et al. 2001; Gerssen et al. 2003; Debattista & Williams 2004). Galaxy Kinematics with SALT 3 Figure 2. SparsePak spectra of a K0.5 III template-star and azimuthally-averaged fiber rings for NGC 3982 at 6 different radii, labeled in units of disk radial scale-length hR. Auto- and cross- correlations are shown (right) for ∼10nm of spectra in the MgI region. 2. Mass Decomposition The traditional technique of decomposing galaxy rotation curves into disk and halo mass contributions is inherently degenerate (see discussion by Sellwood, this volume). One way to break the disk-halo degeneracy is to measure directly the disk potential via the vertical motions and scale-height of the stars. To within factors of order unity: σz = pπG z0 µ M/L, where σz is the vertical component of the disk velocity dispersion, z0 is the disk scale height, µ the sur- face light-intensity, and M/L the mass-to-light ratio (hence µ M/L is the disk surface mas-density, Σ). Recent studies of edge-on galaxies (Kregel et al. 2002) permit vertical scale-heights to be inferred with reasonable accuracy for face-on systems given the observed correlations between the radial scale-length, hR, ro- tation speed, type, and z0. Face-on disks are ideal for measuring σz, typically the smallest component of the velocity ellipsoid, but low inclination makes measure- ment of inclination and rotation speed difficult. Inclined disks require careful correction and decomposition of the observed, line-of-sight velocity-dispersion to extract σz. Past attempts to realize this kinematic approach (e.g., Bottema 4 Bershady et al. 10 8 6 4 2 0 K L / M g o l 1 0 −1 −2 14 16 18 20 22 24 constant star−formation rate stars + gas 1.7−2.6h 1h 3.5h const. SFR, stars only simple stellar pop. Age (Gyr) 1010 109 108 107 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 B−K Figure 3. Direct kinematic surface-mass density and M/L measure- ments from integral-field spectroscopy at 515nm and optical-NIR pho- tometry of NGC 3982: Surface mass-density (Σ) and surface-brightness (µ) vs radius (left); K-band M/L vs rest-frame B − K color (right). Dashed line (left) represents a reference Σ for the MW in the solar neighborhood (Kuijken & Gilmore 1991). Model curves (right) are adopted from Bruzual & Charlot (1993) and Bell & De Jong (2000). Error limits show systematic and random components. 1997) have not overcome these problems, and have been limited by long-slit spectroscopy that does not reach well beyond a single disk scale length. The observational approach can be rectified by application of integral-field observations of nearly face-on disks at medium spectral resolutions (7000 < λ/∆λ < 15000) and multi-band optical and NIR imaging. Two suitable integral- field units (IFUs) are shown in Figure 1. Galaxy sizes can be carefully matched to the IFUs. Observations with these units yield kinematic maps from which accurate inclinations can be derived to i ∼ 15◦ (Andersen & Bershady 2003). Most importantly, the area sampled with IFUs increases with radius. For nearly face-on disks, one may average the signal in rings, which greatly enhances the limiting depth and radius of the observations. Using the two IFUs shown in Figure 1 we have undertaken a survey of nearly face-on, nearby disk galaxies to determine their disk masses. The survey has yielded Hα kinematic maps for ∼100 normal, late-type galaxies. We are now gathering absorption-line spectroscopic observations (for stellar kinematics) for 40 of these galaxies, selected to have regular velocity fields (see Verheijen et al. 2004, Figure 2). Results from a pilot target, NGC 3982, yield σz out to 3.5 disk scale-lengths in this albeit high-surface-brightness disk in both the MgI (515nm; Figure 2) and CaII triplet (860nm) regions. Cross-correlations yield similar results and show that the trend of disk surface-density well traces near-infrared surface-brightness -- mass traces light! -- as shown in Figure 3. Contrary to our earlier, preliminary reports, a renewed analysis of the data indicates a K-band M/L of the disk which is consistent with a maximum-disk situation in the sense of van Albada & Sancisi (1986). The colors and dynamical M/L measurements in Figure 3 agree Galaxy Kinematics with SALT 5 Examples of Massively Multiplexed Spectroscopy (MMS) Figure 4. compared to Long-slit and Fabry-Perot spectroscopy with PFIS. Each present a different slice of the spatial (θ) × spatial (θ) × wavelength (λ) data-cube. "NB" is a narrow-band filter, which in the case of PFIS has a bandwidth of λ/∆λ = 50. Grey regions denote used portions of the CCD. Long-slit spectroscopy makes best use of the CCD array, while MMS and Fabry-Perot modes use only ∼50% compared to the Long-slit case. well with stellar population synthesis models of, e.g., Bell & De Jong (2001), yet this source lies over 2 mag below TF. Here is a small, blue high-surface- brightness, actively star-forming disk, which is rapidly rotating and dominated by normal, baryonic matter out to 3-4 scale-lengths of the light distribution. At face value, this calibration of Bell & De Jong's (2001) models implies, as they note, a Salpeter-like IMF truncated below 0.35 M⊙. It is critical to test the generality of this result in a variety of "normal" systems over a range in type, color and surface-brightness. Our on-going survey will begin to address this issue, but the low-surface-brightness regime will be difficult to probe at the required spectral resolution using 4m-class telescopes. 3. Prospects with the Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph The power of PFIS lies in its unique combination of 3 Fabry-Perot etalons span- ning a factor of 50 in resolution, 6 gratings covering from the UV-atmospheric cutoff to 850 nm at resolutions up to λ/∆λ ∼ 13000, and a suite of narrow- band filters filling an octave at optical wavelengths. All of these options are 6 Bershady et al. configurable with imaging, longslit, or multi-slit mode. Most of the gratings are high-transmissivity volume-phase holographic (VPH) elements, tunable with an articulating camera. For most galaxy kinematic studies, long-slit measurements are inefficient: Two-dimensional sampling is needed to gain velocity field information and to gather more light at large radii. Fabry-Perot imaging, in contrast, is excel- lent for gas and stellar velocity fields based on single, strong lines. How- ever, for velocity dispersion work in narrow-lined (low-mass) systems, ideally many (weak) lines are probed, which requires scanning a significant band-pass (λ/∆λ < 100). Hence an intermediate trade between the spectral and spa- tial sampling of longslit and Fabry-Perot spectroscopy is needed. Integral- or formatted-field spectroscopy, with limited spatial coverage is one alternative, but at first-blush PFIS appears to have no such capability. Other possibilities include using different tracers, such has planetary neb- ulae (e.g., Ciardullo et al. 2003; Merrett et al. 2003). Traditionally this re- quires narrow-band imaging and multi-object spectroscopic follow-up. PFIS is well suited for both. While this is efficient, newer techniques, such as counter- dispersed imaging (e.g., Douglas et al. 2002) also can be accomplished with PFIS. Another approach for multi-object emission-line kinematics would be to use slitless, dispersed imaging, i.e., slitless grism spectroscopy, at high spec- tral resolution over a limited "on" and "off" band-pass using a combination of gratings and narrow-band filters. The on and off bands replace the func- tion of counter-dispersion. The technique should be considered by prospective PFIS users. We describe, instead, an alternative method using gratings and narrow-band filters with slits for IFU-like spectroscopy -- suitable for emission and absorption line studies of extended sources. 3.1. MMS: Massively Multiplexed Spectroscopy The wavelength-spatial multiplex trade for galaxy kinematic studies can be ac- complished with PFIS by combining the suite of λ/∆λ ∼ 50 narrow-band filters with the tunable VPH gratings. The filters serve to limit the range of the dis- persed spectra on the detector, thereby allowing for an increase in the spatial multiplex: Multiple, parallel slits or slit-lets can be placed on a mask and pro- duce non-overlapping spectra covering roughly, e.g., 10nm centered at 515nm -- just what is shown in Figure 2 from SparsePak. The concept for mapping ex- tended sources is illustrated in Figure 4; multi-object applications are possible (Crawford, this volume).1 The minimum spatial separation in the dispersion direction is ∼1 arcmin at the highest spectral resolutions (grating angle α = 50◦), and decreases linearly with resolution (∝ tan α, i.e., the Littrow condition for the VPH gratings). At the highest spectral resolutions MMS yields a spatial multiplex increase of roughly a factor of 4. For lower-dispersion setting, the spatial multiplex can be significantly increased. At any resolution, the slits can be staggered to yield a variety of two-dimension sampling patterns (Figure 4) that resemble 1The Fabry-Perot image is not truly monochromatic (there is a radial field-dependence to the band-pass), and the MMS slits are not uniformly spaced due to field-dependence of the grating incidence angle. Galaxy Kinematics with SALT 7 PFIS/FP RFPI GHASP VIMOS SAURON INTEGRAL OASIS 1000 10000 10000 1000 100 10 PFIS/VPH + NB PFIS/VPH PPAK SparsePak DensePak GMOS PMAS GIRAFFE/ ARGUS Figure 5. Grasp versus spectral power for two-dimensional spectro- scopic systems on 4m and 8m-class telescopes (solid and dashed lines, respectively, with Fabry-Perot instruments shown as filled circles). To- tal grasp is the product of area × solid-angle (AΩ). Spectral power is the product of the spectral resolution, λ/∆λ, times the number of spectral resolution elements, N∆λ. Variations in the shapes of covered parameter space depends on how a given instrument achieves a range of spectral resolution and spatial sampling, i.e., through changes in grat- ings, slit-widths, or both. Note the unique location of PFIS in these diagrams is significantly extended with the use of MMS. e.g., SparsePak. Such data are suitable for constructing velocity fields and dis- persion maps. Hence MMS should provide a competitive approach to the stellar dynamical studies illustrated in the previous section. It is useful to examine where PFIS lies in comparison to other bi-dimensional spectrographs in terms of "information gathering power," which we loosely parametrize with the two quantities "total grasp" and "spectral power". These parameters are defined in Figure 5, where it is seen that PFIS has very large grasp while spanning a wide range in spectral power. The addition of MMS extends the range in grasp and spectral power, bridging between Fabry-Perot and traditional slit-spectroscopy modes. The light-gathering power of PFIS and SALT is over an order of magnitude larger than the 4m-class IFU instruments we have discussed. As such, PFIS can extend the study of galaxy kinematics significantly into the low surface-brightness regime. 4. Summary and Discussion Galaxy kinematic measurements with SALT's PFIS can be used to answer many outstanding, and fundamental questions about the structure and formation of galaxies. Highlighted here is one example of unique, dynamical mass decompo- 8 Bershady et al. sitions of spiral galaxies. A number of observational modes are available with PFIS. We have described one powerful, new mode, referred to as "massively multiplexed spectroscopy," (MMS), which is enabled by the unique combination of VPH gratings and narrow-band filters in PFIS. With MMS and Fabry-Perot imaging, PFIS is a highly competitive survey instrument for two-dimensional studies of gas and stars in nearby galaxies. There are several groups within the SALT consortium interested in applying these to a similar range of dynamical problems. This holds the promise of fruitful collaboration, cross-checks, and innovation. What about higher redshift studies (see Ziegler and Crawford, this vol- ume)? PFIS can sample a 0.6 arcsec slitwidth, but the sub-arcsec image quality enjoyed regularly by VLT and Gemini is needed unless we remain content with spatially-unresolved line-widths. Should it prove feasible to phase the SALT pri- mary segements, we may consider pushing aggressively for significantly improved image quality. This will have a major impact on both resolved, extragalactic as well as high-resolution stellar spectroscopic observations. But SALT is merely a 9m telescope; for extended sources observed at significant spectral resolution, the area -- solid-angle product (AΩ) is what counts. As other facilities rush for the highest possible angular resolution that, with today's detectors, may be better suited for tomorrow's 30m-class telescopes, we should keep good aim on the type of ground-breaking science enabled by our large field of view and the exquisite, multi-faceted spectroscopic capabilities of PFIS. Acknowledgments. This work is funded by NSF AST-0307417, NASA LTSA NAG5-6032 and STScI/GO-9126. References Andersen, D. R. & Bershady, M. A. 2003, ApJ, 599, L79 Bell, E. & de Jong 2001, ApJ, 550, 212 Bershady, M. A., et al. 2003, ApJS, submitted Bershady, M. A., et al. 2004, to appear in PASP Bottema, R. 1997, A&A, 328, 517 Ciardullo, R., et al. 2003, submitted to ApJ Debattista, V. P. & Williams, T. B. 2004, to appear in ApJ Douglas, N. G. et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 1234 Gerssen, J., Kuijken, K., & Merrifield, M. R. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 545 Gerssen, J., Kuijken, K., & Merrifield, M. R. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 261 Kregel, M., van der Kruit, P. C., & de Grijs, R. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 646 Kuijken, K. & Gilmore, G. 1991, ApJ, 367, L9 Merrett, H. R., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 62 van Albada, T. S. & Sancisis, R. 1986, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lon., 320, 447 Verheijen, M. A. W., et al. 2004, AN, 325, 151 Weiner, B. J., Sellwood, J. A. & Williams, T. B. 2001, ApJ, 546, 931
0812.0293	1	0812	2008-12-01T13:37:35	The Gaia Era: synergy between space missions and ground based surveys	[ "astro-ph" ]	The Gaia mission is expected to provide highly accurate astrometric, photometric, and spectroscopic measurements for about $10^9$ objects. Automated classification of detected sources is a key part of the data processing. Here a few aspects of the Gaia classification process are presented. Information from other surveys at longer wavelengths, and from follow-up ground based observations will be complementary to Gaia data especially at faint magnitudes, and will offer a great opportunity to understand our Galaxy.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mem. S.A.It. Vol. 75, 282 c(cid:13) SAIt 2008 Memorie della The Gaia Ea: yegy bewee a e ii ad g d baed vey A. Vallenari1, R. Sordo,1 INAF -- Osservatorio Astronomico, Vic. dell'Osservatorio 5 I-35122 Padova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Gaia mission is expected to provide highly accurate astrometric, photomet- ric, and spectroscopic measurements for about 109 objects. Automated classification of de- tected sources is a key part of the data processing. Here a few aspects of the Gaia classifica- tion process are presented. Information from other surveys at longer wavelengths, and from follow-up ground based observations will be complementary to Gaia data especially at faint magnitudes, and will offer a great opportunity to understand our Galaxy. Key words. Stars: astrometry -- Galaxy: structure 1. Introduction ESA's Gaia mission, to be launched in 2011, is meant to obtain accurate position, parallax and proper motion for 109 object all over the sky, up to magnitude G=20 with an astromet- ric accuracy at the µarcsec level. The low- dispersion spectroscopy obtained in the BP and RP passbands (330 -- 1000 nm, resolution of 3 -- 30 nm) will be used not only to correct the as- trometry for color effects, but also to obtain a characterization of the sources themselves. The Radial Velocity Spectrograph (RVS, 840 -- 890 nm, RP=11 500) will measure radial velocities, with a precision of few km s−1, up to G=16. Gaia will observe the whole sky for five years (plus a possible year extension) achieving a mean of ∼ 80 observations for each source. The final catalog will be available in 2020, pre- ceded by an early data release. The data reduc- tion is a great challenge: the size of Gaia re- lated data will be about 1015 bytes, while the Send offprint requests to: A. Vallenari final data delivered to the community would be of about 20 TB. The estimated computa- tion size will be of the order of 1021 Flops (see Mignard et al 2008). 2. The classification of Gaia objects Gaia does not use a full sky input Catalog. However, in the early stages of the mission, the Guide Star Catalog (Lasker et al 2008) (GSC- II)will be used as inputs for the initial source list to support the identification of the objects. The GSC-II is constructed from the scanned images of the Palomar and UK Schmidt photo- graphic survey digitized at the Space Telescope Science Institute. It makes use of Tycho-2 data as reference for the astrometric calibra- tion. This is a good example of synergy be- tween ground based surveys and spatial mis- sions. Outside the Galactic plane the Catalog is complete down to RF ∼ 20, but stellar clas- sification is reliable at 90% level at RF ∼ 19.5. Coordinates are provided with a mean preci- 8 0 0 2 c e D 1 ] h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 3 9 2 0 . 2 1 8 0 : v i X r a Vallenari & Sordo: The Gaia Era 283 ′′2 -- 0. ′′28 for about 9 × 108 objects. sion of 0. The final Gaia catalog is expected to provide positions, parallaxes, proper motions, radial velocities, photometry in the two broad bands BP/RP, discrete classification of sources, astro- physical parameters (APs) for single stars (i.e. Teff, log g,...), and possibly the parametrization of special sources (galaxies, QSOs). To avoid biases, and to built a reference frame for as- trometry, Gaia will re-classify the observed ob- jects. Such a large amount of data can be clas- sified only in an automated way. In the Gaia project, the classification algorithms are based on both supervised and unsupervised methods (see Smith et al 2008), first producing a dis- crete classification of the objects, i.e. divid- ing objects having higher probability of being stars, galaxies, and QSOs, then estimating its APs by comparison with a set of templates. Finally, the treatment of the outliers will relay on unsupervised methods. The scientific com- munity involved in Gaia is working to calculate extensive libraries of synthetic and observa- tional templates with improved physics for all the classes of objects to be used as training data for the classification algorithms. In the classifi- cation task, Gaia data should be complemented by external (i.e. non-Gaia) information. The simplest way to do this is via astrometric cross matching to existing catalogs. The most obvi- ous candidates are the spectral and/or morpho- logical classifications from SDSS and 2MASS, later also UKIDSS and PS1. FIRST could also be useful for the QSOs. This information could easily be introduced in a multi-component dis- crete classifier by means of the introduction of priors as pre-data estimate that a object belongs to a given class (see Bailer-Jones et al 2008, for a detailed description of the method). 3. Training data for object classification The Gaia object classification includes as well the determination of the APs of stars and possibly galaxies. As we state in the previous Section, supervised methods require the com- parison with a set of templates, either observed or synthetic, as training data sets. While observational programs have already started to built a homogeneous sample of stellar templates, it is clear that training data cannot be purely observational, since a large variety and uniform coverage is requested for the parameter distributions. It turns out that high resolution and high quality synthetic libraries are of fundamental importance. New extensive calculations of sets of spectral stellar libraries with improved physics are on the way. They cover the two Gaia spectral ranges: 300 -- 1100 nm at 0.1 nm resolution, and 840 -- 890 nm at 0.001 nm resolution. These new libraries span a large range in atmospheric parameters, from super-metal-rich to very metal-poor stars, from cool stars to hot, from dwarfs to giant stars, with small steps in all parameters, typically ∆Teff =250 K (for cool stars), ∆ log g=0.5 dex, ∆[Fe/H]=0.5 dex. Depending on Teff, these libraries rely on MARCS (F,G,K stars: Gustafsson et al 2008), PHOENIX (cool and C stars: Brott & Hauschildt 2005), KURUCZ, TLUSTY models including magnetic field, pe- culiar abundances, mass loss (A,B,Be,O stars: Sordo & Munari 2006; Bouret et al 2008; Alvarez & Plez 1998; Kochukhov et al 2005). included WDA and WDB objects (Castanheira et al 2006). models are based on different assumptions: KURUCZ are LTE, plane-parallel, MARCS implement also spherical symmetry while PHOENIX and TLUSTY (hot stars) can calculate NLTE mod- els both in plane-parallel mode and spherical symmetry (see for a more detailed discussion Gustafsson et al 2008; Sordo et al 2008). A comparable effort is carried on in the galaxy domain. We remind that Gaia will extend the existing surveys of galaxies (see or instance the SDSS covering only a fifth of the sky) since it will be able to detect about 107 unre- solved galaxies down to G=20 covering the whole sky for the first time since photographic surveys (UK, ESO, Palomar Schmidt) of 30 years ago in a larger spectral range. Large synthetic libraries of galaxy spectra covering the main Hubble types in the Gaia spectral range at a sampling of 1 nm or less are under construction (see Tsalmantza et al 2007). At present, a library of about 3800 galaxy at zero redshift, and a second one of about 140,000 spectra at changing redshift are available. are Those 284 Vallenari & Sordo: The Gaia Era Finally, QSOs synthetic and semi-empirical libraries (Claeskens et al 2006) are calculated. 4. QSO classification: Gaia reference frame A high precision reference frame in Gaia is ob- viously mandatory to reach a high accuracy of 10 µas in the astrometry. With such a request, the astrometry must be self-calibrating and for this reason Gaia must observe a large num- ber of quasars to define a high precision refer- ence frame. This quasar sample must be very clean, showing only a low contamination by other objects. A probabilistic classifier is built to select objects with higher probability. Care is paid to construct a pure sample of objects, discarding for instance QSOs with low equiv- alent width emission lines which can be easily confused with F-G-K stars (4000-8000 K) hav- ing high extinction (AV ∼ 8 − 10). Preliminary results show that a pure sample of QSOs at 65% level complete down to G=20 can be se- lected. This is adeguate to establish a refer- ence frame for Gaia: Gaia will observe 500 000 QSOs brighter than G=20, but only the ob- jects with the most accurate positions (G < 18) will be used to built a reference frame. Following our preliminary estimates, a sample of 250 000 can be recovered with no more than 13 contaminats (see Bailer-Jones et al 2008). It is clear that the Gaia reference frame needs to be aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) with the highest ac- curacy. The ICRF is based on VLBI positions of about 700 extragalactic radio sources. For this reason an observational program is ini- tiated at the VLBI to identify suitable radio sources to align the two reference systems. At the moment, only a few objects can be use- ful to this purpose, either because they are not bright enough at optical wavelengths, or be- cause they have extended emissions in the ra- dio which precludes to reach the requested as- trometric accuracy (Bourda et al 2008). 5. Gaia and complementary surveys Gaia will be of fundamental importance to study the Galactic structure at low latitudes: the position and the velocity of the OB stars con be measured without assuming rotation curve or extinction. The distances of OB stars at 4 Kpc with Av= 4 mag extinction will be de- rived with an accuracy of 13%, space veloci- ties with an accuracy of a few Km/s. Fainter stars can be measured as well, giving impor- tant information about the mass distribution. However it should be noticed that at faint mag- nitudes (G ∼ 20), the expected accuracy is de- graded and stellar APs cannot be reliably de- termined. Once that a three-dimensional map of the Galactic plane is derived, and that dis- tances and kinematics are known for all the star forming regions, we will be able to trace the disk and spiral structure of the Galaxy. The challenge will be to built dynamical the- ories to reproduce the density fields and the velocity fields. To distinguish between m=2 and m=4 spiral arm structure recent simula- tions find out that the potential needs to be known to 10%, the line-of-sight velocity ac- curacy needs to be better than 20 Km/s, dis- tances shoud be known with uncertainties bet- ter than 30% (Minchev & Quillen 2008). This is well within the possibility limits of the Gaia survey. However, two main problems should be reminded: the first is related to the dust ob- scuration, which might hamper the determina- tion of the star mass density, while the sec- ond is due to the confusion of the stars in the field of view (FOV). Concerning extinc- tion, its knowledge will become a limiting fac- tor in the determination of the stellar luminosi- ties and APs. The estimate made on the basis of G, BP, RP photometry only present some degree of degeneration: it is difficult to de- rive both the extinction and the extinction law for late type giants. Using RVS information, both parameters can be derived. In addition, the use diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs) are ex- tinction tracers will be explored. The strongest expected DIB in the surveyed range is at 862 nm. Its equivalent width well correlates with the interstellar reddening (Munari et al 2008). A large effort in going on in the Gaia commu- nity to ensure a proper determination of the ex- tinction, testing and comparing different meth- ods, including the use of infrared passbands in combination with Gaia passbands (Knude & Vallenari & Sordo: The Gaia Era 285 Lindstroem 2007). In addition, Gaia is confu- sion limited (BP/RP images of different stars are superposed on the FOV) when the total star density per transit (sum of the star number of both FOVs) is higher than 750,000 stars/sq deg. This means that the central inner degrees will not be well measured. Bright stars can probably still be recovered, but the precision will decrease. Simulations are still ongoing (Marrese 2008). Infrared surveys are comple- mentary to Gaia to understand the structure of the inner disk and deal with dust obscura- tion. Current astrometric data in the infrared are of poor quality, even if great improvements were made in the recent past (see 2MASS and DENIS). The UKIDSS will cover only a part of the sky (7000 sq deg), but it will be much deeper (K∼ 18 − 19 on the Galactic plane, and K∼ 21 at higher latitudes over 35 sq deg). Interferometric and adaptive optics astrometry can be very promising, but they can only pro- vide high precision relative astrometry in small fields. However, absolute parallaxes in small fields can be derived with high precision from these observations when enough suitable extra- galactic reference sources are detected in the field of view. Pan STARRS and LSST optical- near infrared surveys covering Northern and Southern sky respectively, are expected to ob- serve 1010 stars down to magnitudes brighter than 24 mag. reaching an accuracy of about 3-25, 1-10 mas, respectively on the parallax determination. One of the space infrared sur- vey which is foreseen in the near future is JASMINE, which is expected to cover the Bulge and the inner disk regions. JASMINE however, will not go very deep (z< 14) ob- serving about 107 stars with a precision of 0.01 mas on the parallaxes. All those surveys will be of great importance to map highly obscured regions where Gaia is not efficient, although they cannot reach the same accuracy on as- trometry. Finally, since Gaia radial velocities will be measured only for G < 16, spectro- scopic ground based follow-up with 8m class telescopes need to be planned. In conclusion, the Gaia mission will pro- vide highly accurate astrometric, photometric, and spectroscopic measurements for a large sample of objects. The high quality of Gaia data, especially on astrometry will not be reached by any of the planned surveys in the near future. Gaia data complemented by infor- mation coming from surveys at longer wave- lengths, and from follow-up ground based ob- servations will offer a great opportunity to un- veil the formation and the structure Galaxy. Acknowledgements. This short review relies on the work of many members of the Gaia community, who are gratefully acknowledged for their valuable con- tribution to the project. References Alvarez R. & Plez B., 1998, A&A 330, 1109 Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. et al 2008, MNRAS, in press Bourda G., Charlot, P., Le Champion, J-F, 2008, A&A submitted Bouret, J.-C. et al. 2008, in preparation Brott, I., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia, 576, 565 Castanheira, B. G., et al 2006, A&A, 450, 331 Claeskens, J.-F., et al 2006, MNRAS, 367, 879 Gustafsson, B., et al. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 805, arXiv:0805.0554 Knude J. & Lindstroem 2007, GAIA-C8-TN- NBI-JK-002 Kochukhov, O., Khan, S., & Shulyak, D. 2005, A&A, 433, 671 Lasker, B.M., Lattanzi, M., et al 2008, AJ 136,735 Marrese, P, 2008, GAIA-C5-TN-LEI-PM- 003 Minchev & Quillen 2008, MNRAS 386,1579 Mignard, F., et al. 2008, in IAUS 248, p.224 Munari U., Tommasella, L.,Fiorucci, L., et al. 2008, A&A 488, 969 Smith K. et al 2008, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 394, p.539 Sordo, R., & Munari, U. 2006, A&A, 452, 735 Sordo R., Vallenari A., et al in Mem.Sait 2008 in press Tsalmantza, P., et al. 2007, A&A, 470, 761
astro-ph/0107153	2	0107	2002-04-16T15:36:41	Implications of O and Mg abundances in metal-poor halo stars for stellar iron yields	[ "astro-ph" ]	Inhomogeneous chemical evolution models of galaxies which try to reproduce the scatter seen in element-to-iron ratios of metal-poor halo stars are heavily dependent on theoretical nucleosynthesis yields of core-collapse supernovae. Hence inhomogeneous models present themselves as a test for stellar nucleosyn- thesis calculations. Applying an inhomogeneous chemical evolution model to our Galaxy reveals a number of shortcomings of existing theoretical nucleosynthesis yields. One problem is the predicted scatter in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] which is too large compared to the one observed in metal-poor halo stars. This can be either due to the O or Mg yields or due to the Fe yields (or both). However, O and Mg are alpha-elements that are produced mainly during hydrostatic burning and thus are not affected by the theoretical uncertainties afflicting the collapse and explosion of a massive star. Stellar iron yields, on the other hand, depend heavily on the choice of the mass-cut between ejecta and proto neutron star and are therefore very uncertain. We present Fe yield distributions as function of progenitor mass that are consistent with the abundance distribution of metal- poor halo stars and are in agreement with observed Ni yields of SNe II with known progenitor masses. The iron yields of lower-mass SNe II (in the range 10-20 Msol) are well constrained by those observations. Present observations, however, do not allow to determine a unique solution for higher-mass SNe. Nevertheless, the main dependence of the stellar iron yield as function of progenitor mass may be derived and can be used as constraint for future supernova/hypernova models. The results are of importance for the earliest stages of galaxy formation when the ISM is dominated by chemical inhomogeneities and the instantaneous mixing approximation is not valid.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. (will be inserted by hand later) Implications of O and Mg abundances in metal-poor halo stars for stellar iron yields 2 0 0 2 r p A 6 1 2 v 3 5 1 7 0 1 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a D. Argast1 , 2, M. Samland1, F.-K. Thielemann2, and O. E. Gerhard1 1 Astronomisches Institut der Universitat Basel, Venusstrasse 7, CH-4102 Binningen, Switzerland 2 Institut fur Physik der Universitat Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland Received . . . / Accepted . . . Abstract. Inhomogeneous chemical evolution models of galaxies which try to reproduce the scatter seen in element- to-iron ratios of metal-poor halo stars are heavily dependent on theoretical nucleosynthesis yields of core-collapse supernovae (SNe II). Hence inhomogeneous chemical evolution models present themselves as a test for stellar nucleosynthesis calculations. Applying such a model to our Galaxy reveals a number of shortcomings of existing nucleosynthesis yields. One problem is the predicted scatter in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] which is too large compared to the one observed in metal-poor halo stars. This can be either due to the oxygen or magnesium yields or due to the iron yields (or both). However, oxygen and magnesium are α-elements that are produced mainly during hydrostatic burning and thus are not affected by the theoretical uncertainties afflicting the collapse and explosion of a massive star. Stellar iron yields, on the other hand, depend heavily on the choice of the mass-cut between ejecta and proto-neutron star and are therefore very uncertain. We present iron yield distributions as function of progenitor mass that are consistent with the abundance distribution of metal-poor halo stars and are in agreement with observed 56Ni yields of core-collapse supernovae with known progenitor masses. The iron yields of lower-mass SNe II (in the range 10 − 20 M⊙) are well constrained by these observations. Present observations, however, do not allow us to determine a unique solution for higher-mass SNe. Nevertheless, the main dependence of the stellar iron yields as function of progenitor mass can be derived and may be used as a constraint for future core-collapse supernova/hypernova models. A prediction of hypernova models is the existence of ultra α-element enhanced stars at metallicities [Fe/H] ≤ −2.5, which can be tested by future observations. The results are of importance for the earliest stages of galaxy formation when the ISM is dominated by local chemical inhomogeneities and the instantaneous mixing approximation is not valid. Key words. Physical processes: nucleosynthesis -- Stars: abundances -- ISM: abundances -- Galaxy: abundances -- Galaxy: evolution -- Galaxy: halo 1. Introduction The key to the formation and evolution of the Galaxy lies buried in the kinematic properties and the chemical composition of its stars. Especially old, metal-poor halo stars and globular clusters are ideal tracers of the forma- tion process. Although many of the properties of the halo component and its substructures have been unveiled, it is still not possible to decide whether the Galaxy formed by a fast monolithic collapse (Eggen, Lynden-Bell & Sandage, 1962), by the slower merging and accretion of subgalac- tic fragments (Searle & Zinn 1978) or within the context of a hybrid picture, combining aspects of both scenarios. Recently, Chiba & Beers (2000) made an extensive inves- tigation to address this question, concluding that a hybrid scenario, where the inner part of the halo formed by a fast, Send offprint requests to: D. Argast, e-mail: [email protected] dissipative collapse and the outer halo is made up of the remnants of accreted subgalactic fragments, best explains the observational data. It also seems to be consistent with the theory of galaxy formation based on cold dark matter scenarios (see e.g. Steinmetz & Muller 1995; Gnedin 1996; Klypin et al. 1999; Moore et al. 1999; Pearce et al. 1999; Bekki & Chiba 2000; Navarro & Steinmetz 2000). However, the kinematic structure of the halo alone is not sufficient to draw a conclusive picture of the formation of the Galaxy. Old, unevolved metal-poor halo stars allow us to probe the chemical composition and (in)homogeneity of the early interstellar medium (ISM) and its evolution with time, since element abundances in the stellar atmo- spheres of those stars directly reflect the chemical com- position of the material out of which they formed. It is almost impossible to determine the age of single stars (ex- cept in a few cases where radioactive thorium or uranium was detected, see e.g. Cayrel et al. 2001). Therefore, the 2 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields metallicity Z or iron abundance [Fe/H] of a star is taken as an age estimate, knowing that an age -- metallicity rela- tion can only be used in a statistical sense for the bulk of stars (see e.g. Argast et al. 2000, hereafter Paper I). Common chemical evolution models mostly assume that the metal-rich ejecta of supernovae (SNe) are mixed instantaneously and homogeneously into the ISM. Models using this approximation, together with theoreti- cal nucleosynthesis yields of type Ia and type II SNe, can explain the behaviour of element-to-iron ratios ([el/Fe]) of stars as function of metallicity [Fe/H] for many ele- ments and for [Fe/H] ≥ −2. This shows that the instan- taneous mixing approximation is valid at this stage and -- since at these metallicities even some of the lowest mass core-collapse supernovae (SNe II) have exploded -- that the stellar yields averaged over the initial mass function (IMF) are for most elements accurate within a factor of two (see e.g. Samland 1997). However, observations of very metal-poor stars show significant scatter in [el/Fe] ratios at [Fe/H] < −2, im- plying that the ISM was not well mixed at this stage (Paper I). These local chemical inhomogeneities were probably mainly caused by SNe II, since progenitors of SN Ia have much longer lifetimes and are unimportant for the chemical enrichment of the ISM until approximately [Fe/H] ≥ −1. At these early stages of galaxy formation, the instantaneous mixing approximation is not valid and yields depending on the mass of individual SNe II become important. Therefore, accurate nucleosynthesis yields as a function of progenitor mass are crucial for the under- standing of the earliest stages of galaxy formation. In Paper I, a stochastic chemical evolution model was presented which accounts for local chemical inho- mogeneities caused by SNe II with different progenitor masses. The model successfully reproduces the scatter in [el/Fe] ratios as function of [Fe/H] for some elements like Si or Ca, but fails quantitatively in the case of the two most abundant α-elements, O and Mg. The scatter in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] is much larger than observed and predicts stars with [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ≤ −1.0. This result de- pends mainly on the employed stellar yields, demonstrat- ing that either the oxygen/magnesium or the iron yields (or both) as a function of progenitor mass are not well determined by existing nucleosynthesis models. The solution to this problem is important for the un- derstanding of the chemical evolution of our Galaxy. In this work, we try to reconcile element abundance observa- tions of metal-poor halo stars with the predictions of our inhomogeneous chemical evolution model by changing the progenitor mass dependence of stellar yields. The forma- tion of oxygen and magnesium in hydrostatic burning and ejection during a SN event is much better understood than the formation and ejection of 56Ni (which decays to 56Fe and forms the bulk of the ejected iron), since the amount of ejected 56Ni is directly linked to the still not fully under- stood explosion mechanism (c.f. Liebendorfer et al. 2001; Mezzacappa et al. 2001; Rampp & Janka 2000). Any at- tempt to alter stellar yields should therefore start with iron and iron-group elements. We present a method to de- rive stellar iron yields as function of progenitor mass from the observations of metal-poor halo stars, assuming given yields of oxygen and magnesium. In Sect. 2 we give a short description of the stochas- tic chemical evolution model, followed by a summary of observations and basic model results in Sect. 3. The dis- cussion of uncertainties in stellar yields and how global constraints on stellar iron yields can be gained from ob- servations is given in Sect. 4. Implications for stellar iron yields and conclusions are given in Sect. 5 and Sect. 6, respectively. 2. The chemical evolution model Observations of very metal-poor halo stars show a scatter in [el/Fe] ratios of order 1 dex. This scatter gradually de- creases at higher metallicities until a mean element abun- dance is reached which corresponds to the [el/Fe] ratio of the stellar yields integrated over the initial mass function. Our stochastic chemical evolution model of Paper I follows the enrichment history of the halo ISM in a cube with a volume of (2.5 kpc)3, down to a resolution of (50 pc)3. Every cell of the grid contains detailed information about the enclosed ISM and the mass distribution of stars. For the purpose of this paper, the enrichment of the ISM with O, Mg, Si, Ca and Fe is computed. At every time-step, randomly chosen cells may create stars. The likelihood for a cell to form a star is propor- tional to the square of the local ISM density. The mass of a newly formed star is chosen randomly, with the con- dition that the mass distribution of all stars follows a Salpeter IMF. The lower and upper mass limits for stars are taken to be 0.1 M⊙ and 50 M⊙, respectively. Newly born stars inherit the abundance pattern of the ISM out of which they formed, carrying therefore information about the chemical composition of the ISM at the place and time of their birth. Stars in a range of 10 − 50 M⊙ are assumed to explode as SNe II (or hypernovae, we will use the term SNe II to in- clude hypernovae unless otherwise noted) resulting in an enrichment of the neighbouring ISM. Intermediate mass stars form planetary nebulae, which return only slightly enriched material. Low mass stars do not evolve signifi- cantly during the considered time but serve to lock up part of the mass, affecting therefore the abundances of elements with respect to hydrogen. Stellar yields are taken from Thielemann et al. (1996, hereafter TH96) and Nomoto et al. (1997). Additionally, since there are no nucleosynthesis calculations for 10 M⊙ progenitors, their yields were set to 1/10 of the yields of the 13 M⊙ model. We then linearly interpolated the stellar yields given in these papers, since we use a finer mass-grid in our simulation. The interpo- lation gives IMF averaged values of [el/Fe] ratios which are in good agreement (within 0.1 dex) with the observed mean values of metal-poor stars. The SN remnant sweeps up the enriched material in a spherical, chemically well mixed shell. Since the explo- D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 3 Fig. 1. [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios vs. metallicity [Fe/H] of metal-poor halo stars (squares and triangles) and model stars (dots). Circles depict [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios of SN II models of the given progenitor mass. (See text for details.) In contrast to observations, model stars with subsolar [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios are predicted by the applied stellar yields, as visible by the location of the 13 and 15 M⊙ SNe. sion energy of SNe II is believed to depend only slightly on the mass of its progenitor (Woosley & Weaver 1995, hereafter WW95; Thielemann et al. 1996), we assume that each SN II sweeps up about 5×104 M⊙ of gas (Ryan et al. 1996; Shigeyama & Tsujimoto 1998). Stars which form out of material enriched by a single SN inherit its abundance ratios and therefore show an element abundance pattern which is characteristic for this particular progenitor mass. This will lead to a large scatter in the [el/Fe] ratios, as long as local inhomogeneities caused by SN events dom- inate the halo ISM. As time progresses, supernova rem- nants overlap and the abundance pattern in each cell ap- proaches the IMF average, leading to a decrease in the [el/Fe] scatter at later times. Since the SN remnant for- mation is the only dynamical process taken into account, this model shows the least possible mixing efficiency for the halo ISM. This is just the opposite to chemical evolu- tion models which use the instantaneous mixing approxi- mation. We continue our calculation up to an average iron abundance of [Fe/H] = −1.0. At this metallicity, SN Ia events which are not included in our model start to influ- ence the ISM significantly. A more detailed description of the model can be found in Paper I. We emphasize one important result: Starting with a primordial ISM and taking into account local inhomo- geneities caused by SNe II, the initial scatter in [el/Fe] ratios is determined solely by the adopted nucleosynthesis yields. The details of the chemical evolution model only determine how fast a chemically homogeneous ISM is reached, i.e. how the scatter evolves with time or (equiv- alently) iron abundance [Fe/H]. Therefore, the range of [el/Fe] ratios of the most metal-poor stars does not de- pend on specific model parameters but is already fixed by the stellar yields. 3. Observations and basic model results As mentioned in the introduction, existing nucleosynthesis models, combined with a chemical evolution model tak- ing local inhomogeneities into account, predict [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios less than solar for some metal-poor stars. This is in contrast to observations of metal-poor halo stars, as can be seen in Fig. 1. The left hand panel shows the [O/Fe] ratio of observed and model stars as func- tion of iron abundance [Fe/H] and the right hand panel the same for [Mg/Fe], where the model stars are plot- ted as small dots. The observational data were collected from Magain (1989), Molaro & Bonifacio (1990), Molaro & Castelli (1990), Peterson et al. (1990), Bessell et al. (1991), Ryan et al. (1991), Spiesman & Wallerstein (1991), Spite & Spite (1991), Norris et al. (1993), Beveridge & Sneden (1994), King (1994), Nissen et al. (1994), Primas et al. (1994), Sneden et al. (1994), Fuhrmann et al. (1995), McWilliam et al. (1995), Balachandran & Carney (1996), Ryan et al. (1996), Israelian et al. (1998), Jehin et al. (1999), Boesgaard et al. (1999), Idiart & Th´evenin (2000), Carretta et al. (2000) and Israelian et al. (2001). Combining data from various sources is dangerous at best, since different investigators use different methods to derive element abundances with possibly different and un- 4 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields known systematic errors. This influences the scatter in [el/Fe] ratios, which plays a crucial role in determining the chemical (in)homogeneity of the ISM as function of [Fe/H]. Unfortunately, there is no investigation with a sample of oxygen/magnesium abundances of metal-poor halo stars that is large enough for our purpose. Therefore, we are forced to combine different data sets, keeping in mind that unknown systematic errors can enlarge the in- trinsic scatter in element abundances of metal-poor stars. Recently, Idiart & Th´evenin (2000) and Carretta et al. (2000) reanalyzed data previously gathered by other au- thors and applied NLTE corrections to O, Mg and Ca abundances, which is a first step in reducing the scatter introduced by systematic errors. Therefore we divided the collected data into two groups, namely the data of Idiart & Th´evenin (2000) and Carretta et al. (2000), which is rep- resented in Fig. 1 by triangles, and the data of all other investigators, represented by squares. If multiple observa- tions of a single star exist, abundances are averaged and pentagons and diamonds are used for the first and sec- ond group, respectively. (Averaging of data points was only necessary in a few cases for Mg, Si and Ca abun- dances.) Note, that the average random error in element abundances is of the order 0.1 dex. Also plotted in Fig. 1 as circles are [el/Fe] ratios pre- dicted by nucleosynthesis calculations of TH96. The num- bers in the circles give the mass of the progenitor star in solar masses. In the picture of inhomogeneous chemical evolution, a single SN event enriches the primordial ISM locally (in our model by mixing with 5 × 104 M⊙ of ISM) with its nucleosynthesis products. Depending on the mass of the progenitor star, the resulting [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios in these isolated patches of ISM cover a range of over two dex and as long as the ISM is dominated by these local inhomogeneities, newly formed stars will show the same range in their [el/Fe] ratios. In particular, this means that stars with [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] as small as −1.0 are in- evitably produced by our model. This is in contrast to the bulk of observed metal-poor halo stars, which show [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios in the range between 0.0 and 1.2, and is a strong indication that existing nucleosynthesis models may correctly account for IMF averaged abundances but fail to reproduce stellar yields as function of progenitor mass. 4. Global constraints on stellar Fe yields 4.1. Uncertainties in O, Mg and Fe yields Apart from the shortcomings of nucleosynthesis yields dis- cussed in Sect. 3, there seems to be an additional uncer- tainty concerning either the stellar yields of O and Mg or the derivation of their abundances in metal-poor halo stars, as shown in Fig. 2: The theoretical nucleosynthesis yields of oxygen (YO (m)) and magnesium (YMg (m)) show a very similar dependence on progenitor mass m, i.e. in first order we can write YMg (m) ≈ 6.7 · 10−2 · YO (m). Thus, for model Fig. 2. [O/Mg] vs. [Mg/H] ratios of metal-poor halo stars. Nucleosynthesis models predict a narrow region of possible [O/Mg] ratios (hatched) which is not consistent with the scatter of observations. Symbols are as in Fig. 1. stars [O/Mg] ≈ 0.0 on average, and due to chemical inho- mogeneities in the early ISM, model stars scatter in the range −0.3 ≤ [O/Mg] ≤ 0.1 (hatched region in Fig. 2). In contrast to theoretical predictions, observations of metal- poor halo stars scatter in the range −0.3 ≤ [O/Mg] ≤ 0.5, with a mean of [O/Mg] ≈ 0.15. This result is very impor- tant, since it means that either even our understanding of nucleosynthesis processes during hydrostatic burning is in- complete or that oxygen abundances at very low metallic- ities tend to be overestimated (or magnesium abundances underestimated). The problem hinted at in Fig. 2 is also connected to the recent finding that the mean [O/Fe] ratio of metal- poor halo stars seems to increase with decreasing metallic- ity [Fe/H], whereas the mean [Mg/Fe] ratio seems to stay constant (see e.g. Israelian et al. 1998, 2001; Boesgaard et al. 1999; King 2000; but see also Rebolo et al. 2002). This result can not be explained by changes in the sur- face abundances due to rotation, since rotation tends to decrease the oxygen abundance in the stellar atmosphere, whereas magnesium abundances remain unaffected (Heger & Langer 2000; Meynet & Maeder 2000). However, the problem described with Fig. 2 would disappear, if the in- crease in [O/Fe] with decreasing metallicity is not real but due to some hidden systematic error. Then oxygen abun- dances would have to be reduced, resulting in a smaller scatter and lower mean in [O/Mg]. Regarding nucleosynthesis products, a crude argument shows that (at least in the non-rotating case) we should not expect a drastic change in the progenitor mass depen- dence of O and Mg yields: Oxygen and magnesium are pro- D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 5 duced mainly during hydrostatic burning in the SN pro- genitor and only a small fraction of the ejecta stems from explosive neon- and carbon-burning (see e.g. Thielemann et al. 1990, 1996). Magnesium is to first order a prod- uct of hydrostatic carbon- and ensuing neon-burning in massive stars. The amount of freshly synthesized magne- sium depends on the available fuel, i.e. the size of the C-O core after hydrostatic He burning, which also determines the amount of oxygen that gets expelled in the SN event. Thus, O and Mg yields as function of progenitor mass should be roughly proportional to each other. A very large mass loss during hydrostatic carbon burning could reduce the size of the C-O core and thus decrease the amount of synthesized magnesium for a given progenitor mass. This would result in a larger scatter of [O/Mg] ratios than in- dicated by the hatched region in Fig. 2. But the evolu- tionary timescale of carbon burning is very short indeed (≈ 5.8 · 103 yr for a 25 M⊙ star, e.g. Imbriani et al. 2001), making a significant change in the structure of the C-O core unlikely. Although the hydrostatic burning phases are thought to be well understood, one has to keep in mind that the important (effective) 12C(α, γ)16O reaction rate is still un- certain and that the treatment of rotation and convection may also influence the amount of oxygen and magnesium produced during hydrostatic burning. Recently, Heger et al. (2000) showed that even in the case of slow rotation important changes in the internal structure of a massive star occur: Rotationally induced mixing is important prior to cen- tral He ignition. After central He ignition, the timescales for rotationally induced mixing become too large com- pared to the evolutionary timescales, and the further evo- lution of the star is similar to the non-rotating case. Nevertheless, He cores of rotating stars are more massive, corresponding to He cores of non-rotating stars with about 25% larger initial mass. Furthermore, for a given mass of the He core, the C-O cores of rotating stars are larger than in the non-rotating case. At the end of central He burn- ing, fresh He is mixed into the convective core, converting carbon into oxygen. Therefore, the carbon abundance in the core is decreased, whereas the oxygen abundance is in- creased. Unfortunately, no detailed nucleosynthesis yields including rotation have been published yet, but since the size of the He core is increased in rotating stars, at least changes in the yields of α-elements have to be expected. (For a review of the changes in the stellar parameters in- duced by rotation see Maeder & Meynet 2000.) Contrary to oxygen and magnesium which stem from hydrostatic burning, iron-peak nuclei are a product of ex- plosive silicon-burning. Unfortunately, no self-consistent models following the main-sequence evolution, collapse and explosion of a massive star exist to date which would allow to determine reliably the explosion energy and the location of the mass-cut between the forming neutron star and the ejecta (Liebendorfer et al. 2001; Mezzacappa et al. 2001; Rampp & Janka 2000). Therefore, nucleosynthesis models treat the mass cut usually as one of several free pa- rameters and the choice of its value can heavily influence the abundance of ejected iron-group nuclei. For this rea- son, we feel that oxygen and magnesium yields of nucleo- synthesis models are more reliable than iron yields, in spite of the uncertainties discussed above. To illustrate this point we show a comparison of O and Mg yields (YO (m), YMg (m), Fig. 3) and of Fe yields (YFe (m), Fig. 4) of nucleosynthesis calculations (neglect- ing rotation) from different authors. The models of WW95 (solar composition "C" models) are marked by filled squares, TH96 by filled circles, Nakamura et al. (2001, 1051 erg models) by open squares and Rauscher et al. (2002, "S" models) by open triangles. Upper points in Fig. 3 cor- respond to O yields, lower points to Mg yields. Apart from the dip visible in YMg (m) of the WW95 models, the O and Mg yields of the different authors agree remarkably well. Chemical evolution calculations by Thomas et al. (1998) show that WW95 underestimate the average Mg yield due to this dip. The minor differences between the models can mostly be attributed to different progenitor models prior to core-collapse, the employed 12C(α, γ)16O reaction rate, the applied convection criterion (e.g. Schwarzschild vs. Ledoux) and artificial explosion methods after core- collapse (e.g. piston vs. artificially induced shock wave). On the other hand, as visible in Fig. 4, YFe (m) of the different authors differs by more than an order of magni- tude for certain progenitor masses, which is mostly due to the arbitrary placement of the "mass-cut" between proto- neutron star and ejecta. In order to reconcile the results of the inhomogeneous chemical evolution model with ob- served [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] abundance ratios, it is there- fore clearly preferable to artificially adjust YFe (m) rather than YO (m) and YMg (m). For the following discussion, reliable O and Mg yields as function of progenitor mass with an estimate of their error range are needed. To this end, we calculated best fit curves to the YO (m) and YMg (m) yields of the different authors, visible as dashed lines in Fig. 3. The low Mg yields of the 20 and 22 M⊙ WW95 models were neglected for this purpose. The deviations ∆ǫ (m) of the original O and Mg yields Yel (m) from our best fit yields Y el (m) is defined as ∆ǫ (m) = Yel (m) − Y el (m) Y el (m) . (1) The error ∆ǫ (m) depends on progenitor mass, but is generally small. To account for the uncertainty in Yel (m) introduced by the different nucleosynthesis mod- els, we replace in the following the original Yel (m) by (1 ± ∆ǫ) · Y el (m), where we dropped the dependence of ∆ǫ (m) on m in the notation. For most progenitor masses, ∆ǫ ≤ 0.2 for both O and Mg and the maximal deviation is in both cases smaller than 0.5. The dotted lines in Fig. 3 show the curves (1 ± ∆ǫ) · Y el (m) with ∆ǫ = 0.2. Since ∆ǫ is small, the impact of the uncertainties in the stellar O and Mg yields is almost negligible for the derivation of constraints on YFe (m). On the other hand, these small 6 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields Table 1. Best fit O and Mg yields Y el (m) proposed in Sect. 4.1. The first column gives the progenitor mass m and the following columns the oxygen and magnesium yields (all values in solar masses). m Y O (m) 2.2E-02 10 8.6E-02 11 12 1.5E-01 3.1E-01 13 4.9E-01 14 6.7E-01 15 16 8.7E-01 1.1E+00 17 1.3E+00 18 1.5E+00 19 1.7E+00 20 21 2.0E+00 2.2E+00 22 2.5E+00 23 2.8E+00 24 25 3.0E+00 3.4E+00 26 3.7E+00 27 4.0E+00 28 4.3E+00 29 30 4.6E+00 Y Mg (m) m Y O (m) 5.0E+00 1.2E-03 4.9E-03 5.4E+00 5.7E+00 8.5E-03 2.0E-02 6.1E+00 3.6E-02 6.5E+00 5.3E-02 6.9E+00 7.3E+00 6.9E-02 8.6E-02 7.7E+00 1.0E-01 8.1E+00 1.2E-01 8.6E+00 9.0E+00 1.4E-01 1.5E-01 9.5E+00 1.7E-01 1.0E+01 1.9E-01 1.0E+01 1.1E+01 2.0E-01 2.2E-01 1.1E+01 2.4E-01 1.2E+01 2.6E-01 1.2E+01 1.3E+01 2.7E-01 2.9E-01 1.3E+01 3.1E-01 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Y Mg (m) 3.3E-01 3.5E-01 3.6E-01 3.8E-01 4.0E-01 4.2E-01 4.4E-01 4.5E-01 4.7E-01 4.9E-01 5.2E-01 5.4E-01 5.6E-01 5.9E-01 6.1E-01 6.4E-01 6.6E-01 6.8E-01 7.1E-01 7.3E-01 uncertainties may (almost) be able to explain the discrep- ancy in the scatter of [O/Mg] ratios between observations and model stars visible in Fig. 2. Allowing for a mean devi- ation of ∆ǫ = 0.2, the maximal scatter in [O/Mg] over all progenitor masses may extend to −0.25 ≤ [O/Mg] ≤ 0.3, which is very close to the one observed. Future nucleo- synthesis calculations have to show whether this interpre- tation is correct or not. For the remaining discussion, we adopt the term (1 ± ∆ǫ) · Y el (m) with ∆ǫ = 0.2 for the stellar oxygen and magnesium yields as a function of progenitor mass, assuming that they reproduce the true production in mas- sive stars well enough. The values adopted for the best fit yields Y el (m) are given in Table 1. 4.2. The influence of Z and SNe from Population III stars Apart from the uncertainties in the O and Mg yields dis- cussed in Sect. 4.1, nucleosynthesis yields may also depend on the metallicity of the progenitor. Unfortunately, the question how important metallicity effects are is far from solved. Nucleosynthesis calculations in general neglect ef- fects of mass loss due to stellar winds. WW95 present nucleosynthesis results for a grid of metallicities from metal-free to solar and predict a decrease in the ejected O and Mg mass with decreasing metallicity. However, the O yields presented lie all in the range covered by the best fit yields (1 ± ∆ǫ) · Y el (m) with ∆ǫ = 0.2 adopted for this paper. This is not true in the case of Mg. But since the "dip" in YMg (m) visible in Fig. 3 gets more and more Fig. 3. O and Mg yields from different authors as func- tion of progenitor mass. Models are from: WW95, filled squares; TH96, filled circles; Nakamura et al. (2001), open squares; Rauscher et al. (2002), open triangles. Upper points correspond to O yields, lower points to Mg yields. Dashed and dotted lines represent best fit curves to the different nucleosynthesis models (see text for details). Fig. 4. Fe yields from different authors as function of pro- genitor mass. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 3. Contrary to O and Mg yields, different authors obtain very different yields for a given progenitor mass. This is mostly due to the arbitrary placement of the mass cut. D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 7 pronounced with lower Z and since it is known (Thomas et al., 1998), that WW95 underestimate the average pro- duction of Mg, we feel that the metallicity dependence of Mg yields is not established well enough to include this feature into our analysis. Contrary to the results obtained by WW95, Maeder (1992) showed that stellar O yields decrease with increas- ing metallicity due to strong mass loss in stellar winds. (No detailed results were given in the case of magne- sium.) Stars more massive than 25M⊙ with solar metal- licity (Z=0.02), eject large amounts of He and C in stel- lar winds (prior to the conversion into oxygen) which re- sults in dramatically reduced O yields. Metal-poor stars (Z≤0.001) do not undergo an extended mass-loss phase and their O yields are comparable to the ones given by WW95 and TH96. Since Z≤0.001 roughly corresponds to [Fe/H] ≤ −1.5 and we are mainly concerned with metal- poor halo stars in this metallicity range, we can neglect changes in O yields due to metallicity. Recently, Heger & Woosley (2000) published nucleo- synthesis calculations of pair-instability SNe from very massive, metal-free (Population III) stars in the mass range from 140M⊙ to 260M⊙. For Population III stars in the mass range 25 − 140M⊙ and stars more massive than 260M⊙, black hole formation without ejection of nucleo- synthesis yields seems likely (Heger & Woosley 2000). In order to investigate the influence of those massive metal- free stars on the enrichment of the ISM and especially their impact on the distribution of model stars in [O/Mg] vs. [Mg/H] plots (c.f. Sect. 4.1), we carried out several in- homogeneous chemical evolution calculations with vary- ing SF efficiencies and IMF shapes for the Population III stars. The detailed results will not be shown here, but some basic conclusions are discussed in the following: The theoretical scatter in [O/Mg] predicted by the massive Population III stars lies in the range −0.3 ≤ [O/Mg] ≤ 0.3. This could help to explain the scatter in [O/Mg] observed in metal-poor stars, if we take ob- servational errors of the order of 0.1 dex into account. Models with a high SF efficiency for Population III stars indeed show some stars with high [O/Mg] ratios. However, 61% of the metal-poor stars ([Fe/H] ≤ −1.0) with ob- served O and Mg abundances show [O/Mg] ≥ 0.1 (see Fig. 2), whereas less than 1% of the model stars have [O/Mg] ratios in this range (the exact number depends on the shape of the IMF). Clearly, the observations of metal-poor stars can not be explained as a consequence of such massive, metal-free SNe. Furthermore, the distri- bution of model-stars in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] can not be reconciled with observations of metal-poor stars. If the SF efficiency of Population III stars is small, these discrepan- cies in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] disappear, but the number of model stars with [O/Mg] ≥ 0.1 decreases even further. We therefore conclude that -- at least for the purpose of this paper -- the (possible) influence of SNe from very massive Population III stars can safely be neglected. 4.3. Putting constraints on Fe yields with the help of observations In order to reproduce the scatter of observed [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios of metal-poor halo stars while keeping the oxygen and magnesium yields fixed, we have to adjust the stellar iron yields YFe (m) as function of progenitor mass m. Since it is not known from theory what functional form YFe (m) follows (increasing with m, declining or a more complex behaviour), we have the freedom to make some ad hoc assumptions. Nevertheless, some important con- straints on YFe (m) can be drawn from the scatter, range and mean of observed [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] abundances, as visible from Fig. 1: 1. IMF averaged stellar yields (integrated over a complete generation of stars) should reproduce the mean oxygen and magnesium abundances of metal-poor halo stars, i.e. [O/Fe] ≈ 0.4 and [Mg/Fe] ≈ 0.4. 2. Stellar yields have to reproduce the range and scatter of [el/Fe] ratios observed. Using oxygen and magne- sium as reference this requires: 0.0 ≤ [O/Fe] ≤ 1.2, − 0.1 ≤ [Mg/Fe] ≤ 1.2. (2) (3) (Note, that the error in abundance determinations is of order 0.1 dex.) 3. There exist a few Type II and Type Ib/c SN ob- servations (1987A, 1993J, 1994I, 1997D, 1997ef and 1998bw) where the ejected 56Ni mass and the mass of the progenitor was derived by analyzing and mod- elling the light-curve (e.g. Suntzeff & Bouchet 1990; Shigeyama & Nomoto 1990; Shigeyama et al. 1994; Iwamoto et al. 1994, 1998, 2000; Kozma & Fransson 1998; Turatto et al. 1998; Chugai & Utrobin 2000; Sollerman et al. 2000). These observations give im- portant constraints on YFe (m) since they constrain the stellar yields for some progenitor masses, although they are not unambiguous (see Sect. 4.3.3). 4. Since observations of metal-poor halo stars show no clear trends in [Mg/Fe] with decreasing [Fe/H] we re- quire that modified iron yields likewise do not intro- duce any skewness in the distribution of model stars. In the case of oxygen, it is not clear yet whether the apparent slope in [O/Fe] in recent abundance studies is real or due to some systematic errors (see Fig. 1 and Sect. 4.1). It is clear that it is not possible to predict YFe (m) unambiguously, since the information drawn from obser- vations is afflicted by errors. We therefore do not attempt to find a solution which reproduces the observations per- fectly, but try to extract the global properties of YFe (m) needed to explain the behaviour of observed [el/Fe] ratios in metal-poor halo stars. 8 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 4.3.1. IMF averaged iron yields Since the yields of TH96 were calibrated so that the first constraint is fulfilled, we require that the average iron yield of SNe II stays constant when we change the pro- genitor mass dependence of YFe (m). Assuming a Salpeter IMF ranging from 0.1 M⊙ to 50 M⊙ and assuming that all stars more massive than 10 M⊙ turn into core-collapse SNe (or hypernovae, see e.g. Nakamura et al. 2001), a SN II produces on average (cid:10)Y O(cid:11) ≈ 1.9 M⊙ of oxygen, (cid:10)Y Mg(cid:11) ≈ 0.12 M⊙ of magnesium and hYFei ≈ 0.095 M⊙ of iron. Leaving the average oxygen and magnesium yields unchanged and modifying the stellar iron yields, we there- fore always have to require that on average ≈ 0.095 M⊙ of iron are ejected per SN. Thus, YFe (m) has to satisfy the following condition: hYFei = R 50 10 YFe (m) m−2.35dm R 50 10 m−2.35dm ≈ 0.095 M⊙. (4) Note that the average [el/Fe] ratio of the model stars depends on the lower and upper mass limits of stars that turn into SNe II and their yields. If we raise the lower mass limit, the average oxygen yield of a SN will increase since many stars with a low oxygen yield no longer con- tribute to the enrichment of the ISM. The same is true for magnesium and iron and the combination of the new av- eraged yields may lead to slightly changed average [el/Fe] ratios. Since there are only a few SNe with large progeni- tor masses, changing the upper mass limit will have a very small influence on the average [el/Fe] ratios. For the re- maining discussion, we will keep the lower and upper mass limits of SNe II fixed at 10 M⊙ and 50 M⊙, respectively. 4.3.2. Range and scatter of observations The second constraint can be used to calculate the range that YFe (m) has to cover. In our picture of inhomoge- neous chemical evolution, we assume that the first SNe locally enrich the primordial ISM. Stars forming out of this enriched material therefore inherit the [el/Fe] ratios produced by these SNe which is determined in turn by the stellar yields Y el (m). (For the time being, we neglect the additional uncertainty hidden in the factor (1 ± ∆ǫ).) Thus, for the first few generations of stars formed at the time the ISM is dominated by local chemical inhomo- geneities, the following identity holds (with the exception of H and He where also the abundances in the primordial ISM have to be taken into account): [el/Fe] = log = log Nel,⋆/NFe,⋆ Nel,⊙/NFe,⊙ Y el (m) /YFe (m) = log Mel,⊙/MFe,⊙ , Mel,⋆/MFe,⋆ Mel,⊙/MFe,⊙ where Nel,⊙ (Nel,⋆) is the number density of a given ele- ment el in the solar (stellar) atmosphere and Mel,⊙ (Mel,⋆) the corresponding mass fraction. (Solar abundances were taken from Anders & Grevesse 1989). Now, let Y el (m) be either the stellar yields of oxygen or of magnesium and α, β the minimal and maximal [el/Fe] ratios derived from observations. Then the constraint gives: α ≤ [el/Fe] ≤ β ⇐⇒ α ≤ log Y el (m) /YFe (m) Mel,⊙/MFe,⊙ ≤ β ⇐⇒ Y el (m) · 10−β · MFe,⊙ Mel,⊙ ≤ YFe (m) ≤ Y el (m) · 10−α · MFe,⊙ Mel,⊙ . Since the yields of oxygen and magnesium as function of progenitor mass are assumed to be known, we now have two sets of inequalities for the stellar iron yields. The first is derived from the minimal and maximal [O/Fe] ratios (Eq. 2): 8.37 · 10−3 · Y O (m) ≤ YFe (m) ≤ 1.33 · 10−1 · Y O (m) , (5) and the second from the minimal and maximal [Mg/Fe] ratios (Eq. 3): 1.23 · 10−1 · Y Mg (m) ≤ YFe (m) ≤ 2.46 · Y Mg (m) , (6) where the uncertainty in the O and Mg yields given by the factor (1 ± ∆ǫ) was neglected. Thus, for any given progen- itor mass, YFe (m) is only determined within a factor of 20 -- 25 and further constraints are needed to derive a reliable iron yield. Fig. 5 shows the stellar iron yields YFe (m) (solid line) from Thielemann et al. (1996) and Nomoto et al. (1997), binned with a bin size of 1 M⊙. To reproduce the range and scatter of [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios observed in metal-poor halo stars, YFe (m) should remain in the re- gion enclosed by the boundaries given by Eqs. (5) and (6), which are shown as dashed (representing [O/Fe] = 0.0), long dashed (representing [O/Fe] = 1.2), dotted (repre- senting [Mg/Fe] = −0.1) and dash-dotted (representing [Mg/Fe] = 1.2) lines. Note that the lower lines in Fig. 5 represent the upper boundaries derived from metal-poor halo stars and vice versa. Evidently, the iron yields of SNe with progenitor masses in the range 10 − 15 M⊙ are out- side the boundaries given by metal-poor halo stars, leading to the stars in our model with much too low [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] abundances (Paper I, c.f. also Fig. 1). Therefore, we can already conclude that the iron yields of these SNe have to be reduced to be consistent with observations. Consequently, the iron yields of some higher-mass SNe have to be increased to keep the IMF averaged [el/Fe] ratios constant (Eq. (4)). This can easily be achieved by assuming a higher explosion energy than the "canonical" 1051 erg of standard SN models for the more massive stars (M ≥ 30 M⊙), as was shown recently by Nakamura et al. D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 9 sults agree remarkably well. The progenitor mass was es- timated to be 20 ± 2 M⊙, while 0.070+0.020 −0.015 M⊙ of 56Ni were ejected during the SN event. SN 1993J had a progenitor in the mass range between 12 to 15 M⊙ and ejected approximately 0.08 M⊙ of 56Ni (Shigeyama et al. 1994; Houck & Fransson 1996), which is very similar to SN 1994I with a 13 to 15 M⊙ progeni- tor and 0.075 M⊙ of ejected 56Ni (Iwamoto et al. 1994). Although the amount of 56Ni ejected by those SNe lies at the upper limit allowed under our assumptions, Fig. 5 shows that these values are still consistent with the con- straints given by Eqs. 5 and 6. Also consistent with our constraints is SN 1997ef with a progenitor mass of 30 − 35 M⊙ and a 56Ni mass of 0.15 ± 0.03 M⊙ (Iwamoto et al. 2000). The correspond- ing iron yield of SN 1997ef is higher than predicted by the nucleosynthesis models of TH96. This is exactly the behaviour needed to adjust YFe (m) according to our con- straints. SN 1997ef does not seem to be an ordinary core- collapse supernova. The model with the best fit to the lightcurve has an explosion energy which is about eight times higher than the typical 1051 erg of standard SN mod- els. Such hyperenergetic Type Ib/c SNe are also termed hypernovae and probably indicate a change in the explo- sion mechanism around 25 − 30 M⊙ which could result in a discontinuity in the iron yields in this mass range. In the case of SN 1997D, the situation is not clear. Turatto et al. (1998) propose two possible mass ranges for its progenitor: They favour a 26 M⊙ star (although the progenitor mass can vary from 25 − 40 M⊙) over a possible 8 − 10 M⊙ progenitor. A recent investigation by Chugai & Utrobin (2000) implies a progenitor mass in the range 8 − 12 M⊙. Both groups deduce an extremely small amount of newly synthesized 56Ni of only ≈ 0.002 M⊙ and an unusual low explosion energy of only a few times 1050 erg. Since the situation about the progenitor mass remains unclear, both possible mass ranges are shown in Fig. 5. On the basis of the small amount of synthesized oxygen of only 0.02−0.07 M⊙ (Chugai & Utrobin 2000), we strongly favour the low-mass progenitor hypothesis, since accord- ing to nucleosynthesis calculations by TH96 and WW95 a high-mass progenitor would produce a large amount of oxygen (≈ 3 M⊙ for a 25 M⊙ progenitor). Moreover, in the latter case the observed 56Ni abundance lies completely outside the boundaries derived in Sect. 4.3.2, as can be seen in Fig. 5. SN 1998bw seems to be another hypernova with a ki- netic energy of (2 − 5) × 1052 erg and may be physically connected to the underluminous γ-ray burst GRB980425 (Galama et al. 1998; Iwamoto et al. 1998; Iwamoto 1999a, 1999b). The hypernova model assumes a progenitor mass of about 40 M⊙, ejecting ≈ 0.7 M⊙ of 56Ni. Recently, Sollerman et al. (2000) observed SN 1998bw at late phases and made detailed models of its light curve and spectra. They propose two possible scenarios for this hypernova: one with a progenitor mass of 40 M⊙ and ejected nickel mass of 0.5 M⊙ and the other with a 25 M⊙ progenitor and 0.9 M⊙ of nickel. Note that the amount of nickel pre- Fig. 5. YFe (m) as function of progenitor mass and bound- aries constraining the range stellar iron yields have to sat- isfy to reproduce the scatter in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] of metal-poor halo stars. According to nucleosynthesis mod- els of Thielemann et al. (1996) and Nomoto et al. (1997), SNe in the range 10 − 15 M⊙ clearly eject too much iron to be consistent with observations. Also shown are obser- vations of core-collapse SNe with known progenitor mass and ejected 56Ni mass. (2001). The reader should note that Thielemann et al. (1996) and Nomoto et al. (1997) calculated models only for the 13, 15, 18, 20, 25, 40 and 70 M⊙ progenitors. For the 10 M⊙ progenitor we assumed an ad hoc iron yield of one tenth of the yield of a 13 M⊙ star and interpolated the intermediate data points. The details of the interpo- lation and especially the extrapolation down to the 10 M⊙ star influence the mean [el/Fe] ratio of the ISM at late stages, when it can be considered chemically homoge- neous. However, this does not change the conclusion that the 13 and 15 M⊙ models of TH96 produce too much iron (if we assume the oxygen and magnesium yields to be correct), as is evident from Figs. 1 and 5. 4.3.3. 56Ni yields from observed core-collapse SNe There are six core-collapse SNe with known progenitor mass and ejected 56Ni mass (which is the main source of 56Fe in SNe II explosions, by the decay 56Ni → 56Co → 56Fe), namely 1987A, 1993J, 1994I, 1997D, 1997ef and 1998bw, that are shown in Fig. 5. Of these, SN 1987A is the most extensively studied (see e.g. Suntzeff & Bouchet 1990; Shigeyama & Nomoto 1990; Bouchet et al. 1991a, 1991b; Suntzeff et al. 1992; Bouchet & Danziger 1993; Kozma & Fransson 1998; Fryer et al. 1999) and the re- 10 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields Fig. 6. Iron yields YFe (m) respecting the constraints given by observations of metal-poor halo stars. YFe (m) starts at a very low value and increases continuously. A linear increase is not possible since the mean [el/Fe] ratios have to be conserved. Fig. 7. Distribution of [O/Fe] ratios vs. metallicity [Fe/H] of model stars resulting from the iron yields shown in Fig. 6. The slope in the distribution of the model stars is consistent with observations of oxygen abundances. A sim- ilar slope is introduced in the [Mg/Fe] distribution which can not be reconciled with observed magnesium abun- dances (See text for details, symbols are as in Fig. 1). sumably synthesized by this 25 M⊙ SN is about 10 times larger than predicted by SN models that use the "canoni- cal" kinetic explosion energy of 1051 erg. Nevertheless, it is still consistent with the constraints derived in Sect. 4.3.2 and with recent calculations of explosive nucleosynthesis in hypernovae by Nakamura et al. (2001). 4.3.4. Slopes in [el/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] distributions Using only the constraints discussed in Sects. 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 still allows for a wide variety of possible iron yields YFe (m). This is demonstrated by Figs. 6 and 8, where two simple ad hoc iron yield functions are shown. The distri- butions of model stars resulting from these iron yields are plotted in Figs. 7 and 9. In Fig. 6 the iron yield YFe (m) starts at the [O/Fe] = 1.2 boundary, increases continuously with increasing progenitor mass and ends at the [O/Fe] = 0.0 boundary. Consequently, low-mass SNe create a high [O/Fe] ratio in their surrounding primordial ISM, whereas it is close to so- lar in the neighbourhood of high-mass SNe. The resulting [O/Fe] distribution of model stars can be seen in Fig. 7. The distribution shows a clear trend from high to low [O/Fe] ratios with increasing [Fe/H]. A simple least-square fit to our data yields [O/Fe] = −0.21 × [Fe/H] + 0.01. This is in surprisingly good agreement with the result of King (2000), who finds the relation [O/Fe] = −0.18 × [Fe/H] + 0.02 after considering the effects of NLTE corrections to oxygen abundance determinations from UV OH-lines. Fig. 8. Iron yields YFe (m) respecting the constraints given by observations of metal-poor halo stars. YFe (m) starts at a somewhat higher value than in Fig. 6, reaches a maxi- mum at about 30 M⊙ and decreases again. D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 11 ary, increases with progenitor mass, reaches its maximum around 30 M⊙, decreases again and ends at the [O/Fe] = 1.2 boundary. The resulting distribution in [O/Fe] shows a rising slope, which is clearly in contradiction with observations. The slope is a consequence of the fact that the iron yields YFe (m) of SNe in the range 10 − 15 M⊙ stay very close to the boundary that represents the ratio [O/Fe] = 0.0. SNe in this mass range form the bulk of SN II events and it is therefore not surprising that their large number introduces such a slope in the distribution of model stars. Thus, this YFe (m) also has to be discarded. These simple examples show that YFe (m) should not run parallel to the boundaries over a large progenitor mass interval, otherwise an unrealistic slope is introduced in the [el/Fe] distribution of model stars. They demonstrate further, that the information drawn from metal-poor halo stars alone is not sufficient to derive reliable iron yields, and that information from SN II events and the shape of the [el/Fe] distribution as function of [Fe/H] (i.e. how fast the scatter decreases and whether slopes are present or not) has to be included in our analysis. 5. Implications for stellar Fe yields In Sect. (4.3.4) we have shown that the iron yields of lower-mass SNe (in the range 10 − 20 M⊙) are crucial to the distribution of model stars in [el/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] plots, since progenitors in this mass range compose the bulk (ap- proximately 69%) of SN II events. Thus, the iron yields of lower-mass SNe should not introduce a slope in the [el/Fe] distribution but should cover the entire range of observed [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios in order to reproduce the ob- servations. To accomplish this, YFe (m) should not lie too close to the boundaries given in Eqs. (5) and (6) in this mass range but should start at the lower boundary ([O/Fe] = 1.2) and reach the upper boundary ([O/Fe] = 0.0) for some progenitor in the mass range 10 − 20 M⊙. If the ob- served 56Ni production of SN 1993J, 1994I and 1987A are also taken into account, the observational constraints are stringent enough to fix the iron yields of the low mass SNe apart from small variations: YFe (m) starts at the lower boundary, increases steeply in the range 10 − 15 M⊙ to the values given by SN 1993J and 1994I and remains al- most constant in the range 15 − 20 M⊙ (to account for SN 1987A). For the remaining discussion we therefore assume the Fe yields in this range to be ≈ 1.5 · 10−4 M⊙ for a 10 M⊙ progenitor, ≈ 5.5 · 10−2 M⊙ for a 15 M⊙ progen- itor and ≈ 7.0 · 10−2 M⊙ for a 20 M⊙ progenitor. (The detailed yields resulting from our analysis are listed in Table 2). We now take a look at possible iron yields of higher mass SNe corresponding to the different models of the progenitor masses of SN 1997D and 1998bw. There are four possible combinations of the progenitor masses of those two SNe. S1: The first case (model S1, shown in Fig. 10) gives the best fit to abundance observations of metal-poor halo stars. Here, we preferred the lower mass progenitor mod- els of SN1997D and SN 1998bw over the higher mass Fig. 9. Distribution of [O/Fe] ratios vs. metallicity [Fe/H] of model stars resulting from the iron yields shown in Fig. 8. Clearly, the rising slope in the distribution of model stars is not consistent with observations of metal-poor halo stars. Symbols are as in Fig. 1. The reason for the slope in our model is given by the distribution of [O/Fe] and [Fe/H] ratios induced in the metal-poor ISM by core-collapse SNe with different pro- genitor masses, as indicated by the position of the cir- cles in Fig. 7. All the low mass SNe with progenitors up to 15 M⊙ induce high [O/Fe] and low [Fe/H] ratios in the neighbouring primordial ISM, whereas high-mass SNe produce low [O/Fe] and high [Fe/H] ratios (recall that a constant mixing mass of 5 × 104 M⊙ per SN event is assumed, c.f. Sect. 2). SNe with intermediate masses in- duce [O/Fe] ratios that lie approximately on a straight line connecting the two extrema. The distribution of model stars of the first few stellar generations follows this line closely. As the mixing and chemical enrichment of the halo ISM proceeds, the distribution then converges to the IMF averaged [O/Fe] ratio. Although the inhomogeneous enrichment is responsible for the slope which is in good agreement with observations by e.g. Israelian et al. (1998), Boesgaard et al. (1999), and King (2000), it fails to re- produce the scatter seen in observed oxygen abundances. Model stars with [O/Fe] ≈ 1.2 exist only at [Fe/H] ≤ −3.5 and not at [Fe/H] ≈ −2.5, where several are observed. Furthermore, a similar slope is introduced in the [Mg/Fe] distribution ([Mg/Fe] = −0.26 × [Fe/H] − 0.07), where none is seen in observations and several model stars show [Mg/Fe] ratios as large as ≈ 1.5. Therefore, this YFe (m) has to be rejected (see however Rebolo et al. 2002 con- cerning [Mg/Fe]). The situation displayed in Figs. 8 and 9 is even worse. Here, the iron yield starts at the [O/Fe] = 0.0 bound- 12 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields Fig. 10. Model S1: Iron yields YFe (m) respecting the con- straints deduced from metal-poor halo stars and SN obser- vations. The 10 M⊙ model of SN 1997D and 25 M⊙ model of SN 1998bw are assumed to be correct. Fig. 12. Model H2: Iron yields YFe (m) respecting the con- straints deduced from metal-poor halo stars and SN obser- vations. The 26 M⊙ model of SN 1997D and 25 M⊙ model of SN 1998bw are assumed to be correct. models. The curve is characterized by a peak of 0.59 M⊙ of iron at 25 M⊙ and a slow decline of the yields down to 9.5 · 10−2 M⊙ for the 50 M⊙ progenitor. The yields have to decline again to meet the mean abundances ob- served in metal-poor halo stars. Obviously, YFe (m) ful- fils the constraints discussed in Sects. (4.3.1), (4.3.2) and (4.3.3). Since no slope is visible in the resulting distribu- tion of [O/Fe], [Mg/Fe], [Si/Fe] and [Ca/Fe] ratios (shown Fig. 11. Model H1: Iron yields YFe (m) respecting the con- straints deduced from metal-poor halo stars and SN obser- vations. The 26 M⊙ model of SN 1997D and 40 M⊙ model of SN 1998bw are assumed to be correct. Fig. 13. Model S2: Iron yields YFe (m) respecting the con- straints deduced from metal-poor halo stars and SN obser- vations. The 10 M⊙ model of SN 1997D and 40 M⊙ model of SN 1998bw are assumed to be correct. D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 13 Table 2. Iron yields YFe (m) proposed in Sect. 5. The first column gives the progenitor mass m in solar masses. The following columns give the iron mass (in solar masses) synthesized in the corresponding SN event according to nucleosynthesis calculations of Thielemann et al. (1996) and Nomoto et al. (1997) -- denoted by TN -- and the models S1, S2, H1 and H2. m 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 TN 1.6E-02 8.0E-02 1.3E-01 1.6E-01 1.6E-01 1.4E-01 1.2E-01 1.1E-01 1.0E-01 9.0E-02 8.0E-02 7.4E-02 7.0E-02 6.5E-02 6.1E-02 5.8E-02 5.9E-02 6.1E-02 6.3E-02 6.5E-02 6.7E-02 6.9E-02 7.1E-02 7.3E-02 7.5E-02 7.7E-02 7.9E-02 8.1E-02 8.3E-02 8.5E-02 8.6E-02 8.7E-02 8.7E-02 8.7E-02 8.7E-02 8.7E-02 8.7E-02 8.7E-02 8.7E-02 8.6E-02 8.6E-02 S1 1.5E-04 1.9E-03 6.8E-03 2.0E-02 5.2E-02 5.5E-02 6.0E-02 6.3E-02 6.7E-02 7.0E-02 7.1E-02 1.1E-01 1.8E-01 2.7E-01 4.2E-01 5.9E-01 5.1E-01 4.3E-01 3.7E-01 3.2E-01 2.7E-01 2.2E-01 2.0E-01 1.8E-01 1.6E-01 1.5E-01 1.4E-01 1.3E-01 1.3E-01 1.2E-01 1.2E-01 1.1E-01 1.1E-01 1.0E-01 1.0E-01 9.8E-02 9.6E-02 9.6E-02 9.5E-02 9.5E-02 9.5E-02 S2 1.6E-04 1.9E-03 6.8E-03 2.0E-02 5.2E-02 5.5E-02 6.0E-02 6.3E-02 6.7E-02 6.9E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 7.0E-02 8.2E-02 9.8E-02 1.2E-01 1.4E-01 1.7E-01 2.0E-01 2.3E-01 2.8E-01 3.3E-01 3.9E-01 4.6E-01 5.3E-01 6.3E-01 7.6E-01 8.8E-01 1.0E-00 1.2E-00 1.4E-00 1.6E-00 1.8E-00 2.1E-00 H1 1.5E-04 1.8E-03 6.7E-03 1.9E-02 5.1E-02 5.6E-02 6.0E-02 6.3E-02 6.7E-02 6.9E-02 6.9E-02 7.1E-02 7.3E-02 7.6E-02 7.8E-02 8.1E-02 1.9E-03 9.6E-03 2.3E-02 4.9E-02 8.2E-02 1.3E-01 1.8E-01 2.4E-01 3.0E-01 3.5E-01 3.9E-01 4.4E-01 4.8E-01 5.3E-01 5.8E-01 6.4E-01 6.9E-01 7.7E-01 8.6E-01 9.3E-01 1.0E-00 1.1E-00 1.2E-00 1.2E-00 1.3E-00 H2 1.5E-04 1.8E-03 6.8E-03 1.9E-02 5.1E-02 5.6E-02 6.0E-02 6.3E-02 6.7E-02 7.1E-02 7.1E-02 1.1E-01 1.8E-01 2.7E-01 4.2E-01 5.9E-01 1.9E-03 6.7E-03 1.6E-02 3.4E-02 5.8E-02 8.9E-02 1.3E-01 1.7E-01 2.1E-01 2.4E-01 2.7E-01 3.1E-01 3.3E-01 3.6E-01 3.9E-01 4.3E-01 4.5E-01 4.9E-01 5.3E-01 5.8E-01 6.1E-01 6.5E-01 7.0E-01 7.4E-01 7.9E-01 in Fig. 14), the constraint described in Sect. (4.3.4) is also respected. The distribution of model stars in [O/Fe], [Mg/Fe] and [Si/Fe] is in good agreement with the distri- bution of observed stars, whereas a few stars with too low [Ca/Fe] ratios are predicted. However, this may be due to the fact that Ca stems from explosive O and Si burn- ing and therefore depend on the structure of the progeni- tor model and the (assumed) explosion energy (Paper I). Note, that the mean [Mg/Fe] and [Ca/Fe] ratios in the [el/Fe] plots are slightly shifted compared to the mean of observations. This problem also occurs when the original yields of TH96 are used (Paper I) and will persist for ev- ery YFe (m) we present, since we did not change the mean iron yield of 0.095 M⊙ (Eq. (4)). Especially noteworthy is the good agreement in [Si/Fe], since we did not include Si in the derivation of the constraints discussed above. Moreover, the hypothetical iron yields in the other mod- els below all result in [Si/Fe] distributions that do not fit the observations as well as model S1. Therefore, we feel that model S1 gives the best fit to element abundances in metal-poor halo stars. H1: Fig. 11 shows the iron yields under the assumption that the higher mass models of SN 1997D and SN 1998bw are correct (model H1). Here YFe (m) stays almost con- stant up to 25 M⊙, followed by a sudden plunge of the yields down to 1.9 · 10−3 M⊙ to account for SN 1997D and then a continuous rise to 0.79 M⊙ of synthesized iron for the 50 M⊙ progenitor that is necessary to account for the IMF averaged yield. This sudden decrease of the iron yields could indicate a change in the explosion mecha- nism from supernovae with "canonical" kinetic explosion energies of 1051 erg to hypernovae with 10 − 100 times higher explosion energies. However, as visible in Fig. 11, the very low iron yield of the 26 M⊙ progenitor violates the [O/Fe] = 1.2 and [Mg/Fe] = 1.2 boundaries derived from observations, so we would expect model stars with much too high [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios. This is indeed the case, as can be seen in the corresponding [el/Fe] dis- tribution (Fig. 15). A closer examination of the [el/Fe] distributions, on the other hand, reveals that these model stars are mainly present at very low metallicities ([Fe/H] ≤ −2.5). This makes it difficult to decide, whether model H1 with its dip in YFe (m) has to be discarded or not. The situation for oxygen remains unclear since no oxygen abundances were measured at metallicities where the ef- fect is most pronounced ([Fe/H] ≤ −3.0). However, in the range −3.0 ≤ [Fe/H] ≤ −1.5 there are many observations with [O/Fe] ≥ 0.6 whereas the bulk of model stars in this range shows [O/Fe] ≈ 0.4. Furthermore, many observa- tions of Mg abundances in halo stars with [Fe/H] ≤ −3.0 exist, but only one shows a ratio of [Mg/Fe] ≥ 1.0. The re- maining stars all have [Mg/Fe] ≤ 0.8, which is in contrast to the predictions of the model. Contrary to O and Mg, there are indeed several observations of metal-poor halo stars with very high [Si/Fe] and [Ca/Fe] ratios at [Fe/H] ≤ −2.5 and the fit in [Si/Fe] and [Ca/Fe] is not too bad. However, there are some observed stars with [Si/Fe] ≤ 0.0 that are not reproduced by the inhomogeneous chemical evolution model. All told, model H1 clearly does not fit the observations as well as model S1. H2: The iron yields shown in Fig. 12 (model H2) are a result of the assumption that the 26 M⊙ model of SN 1997D together with the 25 M⊙ model of SN 1998bw are correct. Coincidentally, YFe (m) is also compatible with the 10 M⊙ and 40 M⊙ models of SN 1997D and SN 1998bw due to the requirement to keep the average iron yield con- stant. Fig. 16 shows the resulting [el/Fe] distributions. Due 14 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields to the low amount of 56Ni ejected by the 26 M⊙ progenitor that is the same for models H1 and H2 (c.f. Figs. 11, 12 and Table 2), the problems in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] described in the discussion of model H1 still persist. Compared to model H1, the fit in [Si/Fe] is now significantly improved, whereas model stars with [Ca/Fe] abundances that are too low are again generated by the inhomogeneous chem- ical evolution code (compare with model S1). However, although models H1 and H2 predict metal-poor halo stars with [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios as high as ≈ 1.5, they can not be clearly discarded and the discovery of stars with metallicities [Fe/H] ≤ −2.5 and 0.8 ≤ [Mg/Fe] ≤ 1.5 would be a strong argument for the validity of the sudden decrease in the iron yields proposed by the models H1 and H2. S2: Finally, in Fig. 13 we show possible iron yields as- suming that the 10 M⊙ model of SN 1997D and 40 M⊙ model of SN 1998bw are correct (model S2). Here, YFe (m) shows a plateau in the progenitor mass range from 15 M⊙ to 30 M⊙, followed by an increasing yield with increas- ing progenitor mass. The resulting [el/Fe] distributions are shown in Fig. 17. A shallow slope in the [el/Fe] ratios is visible in every element, violating the constraint dis- cussed in Sect. (4.3.4). Furthermore, the scatter in [O/Fe] and [Si/Fe] clearly is not fitted by the model stars. This is especially conspicuous in the case of Si: According to the model we would expect the bulk of [Si/Fe] abundances to lie in the range 0.4 ≤ [Si/Fe] ≤ 0.8. To the contrary, most of the observed stars have [Si/Fe] ≤ 0.4. Model S2 therefore gives the worst fit to element abundance deter- minations in metal-poor halo stars. A physical explanation for a sudden drop of the iron yields of SNe with progenitor masses around 25 M⊙ was suggested by Iwamoto et al. (2000): Observational and theoretical evidence indicate that stars with main- sequence masses Mms ≤ 25 M⊙ form neutron stars with a typical iron yield of ≈ 0.07 M⊙, while progenitors more massive than this limit might form black holes and, due to the deep gravitational potential, have a very low (or no) iron yield. This might have been the case for SN 1997D. One of the two possible models reconstructing its light- curve assumes a 26 M⊙ progenitor and a very low kinetic energy of only a few times 1050 erg and an equally low 56Ni yield of ≈ 0.002 M⊙. (But note that the lower-mass progenitor model seems more likely, c.f. Sect. 4.3.3). On the other hand, hypernovae such as 1997ef or 1998bw with progenitor masses around 30 M⊙ and 40 M⊙ and explo- sion energies as high as 10 − 100 × 1051 erg might be energetic enough to allow for high iron yields even when a black hole forms during the SN event (see e.g. MacFadyen et al. 2001). However, one of the models of SN 1998bw proposes a 25 M⊙ progenitor with a kinetic energy typ- ical for hypernovae (i.e. much larger than the explosion energy of SN 1997D). This is in some sense a contradic- tion to the case of SN 1997D if we assume that a black hole formed in both cases: If the explosion mechanism is the same for SN 1998bw and SN 1997D it is natural to assume that the explosion energy scales with the mass of the progenitor and it is hard to imagine a mechanism that would account for a hypernova from a 25 M⊙ progenitor with an explosion energy that is ≈ 100 times larger than the explosion energy from a 26 M⊙ progenitor. Therefore, model H1 would fit nicely into the (qual- itative) hypernova scenario proposed by Iwamoto et al. (2000), whereas models S1, S2 and H2 (yet) lack a physi- cal explanation. On the other hand, model S1 gives a much better fit to the observations than H1, H2 and S2. Models H1 and H2 could be tested, since they predict a number of stars with very high [O/Fe], [Mg/Fe], [Si/Fe] and [Ca/Fe] ratios (up to 1.5 dex) at metallicities [Fe/H] < −2.5. The discovery of such ultra α-element enhanced stars would be a strong argument in favour of the hypernova scenario proposed by Iwamoto et al. (2000) and the existence of a sudden drop in the iron yields of supernovae/hypernovae with progenitors around 25 M⊙. Table 2 lists the numerical values of YFe (m) as func- tion of progenitor mass m for the models discussed above. Model S1 gives the best fit to the distribution of α-element abundances in metal-poor halo stars while S2 gives the worst. Although the models H1 and H2 violate the con- straints discussed in Sect. (4.3.2) and thus do not give a fit as good as the one of S1, they cannot be ruled out on the basis of the observational data available to date. 6. Conclusions Inhomogeneous chemical evolution models in conjunction with a current set of theoretical nucleosynthesis yields pre- dict the existence of very metal poor stars with subsolar [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios (Argast et al. 2000). This re- sult is a direct consequence of the progenitor mass depen- dence of stellar yields, since core-collapse SNe of different masses imprint their unique element abundance patterns on the surrounding ISM. No observational evidence of the existence of such stars is found, and recent investigations on the contrary indicate an increasing [O/Fe] ratio with decreasing metallicity [Fe/H]. This result of the inhomo- geneous chemical evolution calculations is primarily due to the input stellar yields and not due to the details of the model itself. This is a strong indication that the progen- itor mass dependence of existing nucleosynthesis models is not fully understood. This in itself is not surprising, since no self-consistent models of the core-collapse and the ensuing explosion exist to date (c.f. Liebendorfer et al. 2001; Mezzacappa et al. 2001; Rampp & Janka 2000). A crucial parameter of explosive nucleosynthesis models is the mass-cut, i.e. the dividing line between proto-neutron star and ejecta. This gives rise to a large uncertainty in the amount of iron that is expelled in the explosion of a massive star. On the other hand, oxygen and magnesium are mainly produced during hydrostatic burning and are therefore not strongly affected by the details of the ex- plosion mechanism. However, the distribution of [O/Mg] ratios of metal-poor halo stars suggests that either un- certainties exist even for O and Mg yields, or that obser- D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 15 Fig. 14. [el/Fe] distribution of model stars for O, Mg, Si and Ca resulting from the iron yields shown in Fig. 10 (model S1). vations overestimate oxygen or underestimate magnesium abundances in such metal-poor stars. The predictions of our inhomogeneous chemical evolu- tion model can be rectified under the assumption that the stellar yields of oxygen and magnesium reflect the true production in massive stars well enough, and by replac- ing the stellar iron yields of Thielemann et al. (1996) and Nomoto et al. (1997) by ad hoc iron yields YFe (m) as function of progenitor mass m. These are derived in this paper from observations of metal-poor halo stars and core- collapse SNe with known progenitor and ejected 56Ni mass (the main source of 56Fe by the decay 56Ni → 56Co → 56Fe). Such ad hoc iron yields have to satisfy the following constraints: First, the IMF averaged stellar yields should reproduce the mean [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] abundances of metal-poor halo stars. Second, the range and scatter ob- served in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios of metal-poor halo stars must be reproduced. This, in conjunction with stellar oxygen and magnesium yields, leads in turn to upper and lower boundaries for YFe (m). Third, no slope should be introduced by YFe (m) in the [el/Fe] distribution of model stars that is not compatible with observations. And finally, 16 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields Fig. 15. [el/Fe] distribution of model stars for O, Mg, Si and Ca resulting from the iron yields shown in Fig. 11 (model H1). the progenitor mass dependence of the iron yields should be consistent with the ejected 56Ni mass of observed core- collapse SNe with known main-sequence mass. Here, the situation is complicated by SN 1997D and SN 1998bw. The models recovering their light-curves give in each case two significantly different progenitor masses. These con- straints severely curtail the possible iron yield distribu- tions but are not stringent enough to determine YFe (m) unambiguously. The main results of this paper are summarized in the following points: 1. Observations of O and Mg abundances in metal-poor halo stars and of the ejected 56Ni mass in core-collapse SNe, in conjunction with oxygen and magnesium yields from nucleosynthesis calculations and inhomogeneous chemical evolution models, provide a valuable tool to constrain the amount of iron ejected in a SN event as function of the main-sequence mass of its progenitor. 2. The [el/Fe] distribution of model stars as function of metallicity [Fe/H] is sensitive to the iron yields of SNe with progenitors in the mass range 10−20 M⊙. A steep increase of YFe (m) from ≈ 1.5 · 10−4 M⊙ for a 10 M⊙ D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 17 Fig. 16. [el/Fe] distribution of model stars for O, Mg, Si and Ca resulting from the iron yields shown in Fig. 12 (model H2). progenitor to ≈ 5.5 · 10−2 M⊙ for a 15 M⊙ progenitor followed by a slow increase to ≈ 7.0 · 10−2 M⊙ for a 20 M⊙ progenitor is required to give an acceptable fit to the observations of metal-poor halo stars. 3. The further trend of YFe (m) in the mass range 20 − 50 M⊙ cannot be unambiguously determined by the available data. For this mass range we have deduced four possible iron yield distributions (models S1, S2, H1 and H2) that explore the available freedom. These correspond to the four different combinations of prob- able progenitor masses of SN 1997D and SN 1998bw. Iron yield distributions that differ significantly form the presented models can be excluded. 4. Model S1 gives the best fit to observations while mod- els H1 and H2 can not be ruled out. Model S2 gives the worst fit to observed [el/Fe] ratios in metal-poor halo stars. A change in the explosion mechanism of SNe II around 25 M⊙ is expected in the case of the "H" models. A test to distinguish between models S1 and H1/H2 would be the discovery of very metal-poor stars ([Fe/H] ≤ −2.5) that are highly enriched in α- elements. 18 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields Fig. 17. [el/Fe] distribution of model stars for O, Mg, Si and Ca resulting from the iron yields shown in Fig. 13 (model S2). 5. Iron yield distributions derived from observations through inhomogeneous chemical evolution models yield constraints on the mass-cut in a SN II event if the detailed structure of the progenitor model is known (i.e. the size of the iron core and the zone that undergoes explosive Si burning). Thus, they can be used as benchmarks for future core-collapse super- nova/hypernova models. In future, a large and above all homogeneously ana- lyzed sample of O, Mg and Fe abundances in very metal- poor stars is needed to derive more stringent constraints on YFe (m). Not only would this allow us to determine the exact extent of the scatter in [O/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] ratios, but would also answer the important question whether the scatter in [O/Mg] is real or due to some (yet) unknown systematic errors in O and Mg abundance determinations. If the scatter in [O/Mg] turns out to be real, updated nucleosynthesis calculations including rotation and mass loss due to stellar winds are needed to understand O and Mg abundances in metal-poor halo stars. D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields 19 Also very valuable would be the observation and anal- ysis of further core-collapse supernovae/hypernovae. Only six core-collapse SNe with known progenitor and ejected 56Ni mass are known to date, and for two of them their progenitor masses are not clearly determined. Especially the discovery of a SN II with a progenitor in the critical mass range from 20 − 30 M⊙ could provide us with the information needed to discern between the four models presented above, or at least whether the "S" or "H" mod- els have to be preferred. This would also be a step towards answering the question whether a change in the explosion mechanism of core-collapse SNe occurs, i.e. the formation of a black hole and significant increase of the explosion energy for m ≥ 25 M⊙. Acknowledgements. We thank the referee R. Henry for his valuable suggestions that helped to improve this paper sig- nificantly. D. Argast also thanks A. Immeli for frequent and interesting discussions. This work was supported by the Swiss Nationalfonds. References Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 197 Argast, D., Samland, M., Gerhard, O. E., & Thielemann, F.-K. 2000, A&A, 356, 873 (Paper I) Balachandran, S. C., & Carney, B. W. 1996, AJ, 111, 946 Bekki, K., & Chiba, M. 2000, ApJ, 534, L89 Bessel, M. S., Sutherland, R. S., & Ruan, K. 1991, ApJ, 383, L71 Beveridge, R. C., & Sneden, C. 1994, AJ, 108, 285 Boesgaard, A. M., King, J. R., Deliyannis, C. P., & Vogt, S. S. 1999, AJ, 117, 492 Bouchet, P., Danziger, I. J., & Lucy, L. B. 1991, AJ, 102, 1135 Bouchet, P., Phillips, M. M., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 1991, A&A, 245, 490 Bouchet, P., & Danziger, I. J. 1993, A&A, 273, 451 Carretta, E., Gratton, R. G., & Sneden, C. 2000, A&A, 356, 238 Cayrel, R., Hill, V., Beers, T. C., et al. 2001, Nature, 409, 691 Chiba, M., & Beers, T. C. 2000, AJ, 119, 2843 Chugai, N. N., & Utrobin, V. P. 2000, A&A, 354, 557 Eggen, O. J., Lynden-Bell, D., & Sandage, A. R. 1962, ApJ, 136, 748 Fryer, L. C., Colgate, S. A., & Pinto, P. A. 1999, ApJ, 511, 885 Fuhrmann, K., Axer, M., & Gehren, T. 1995, A&A, 301, 492 Galama, T. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., van Paradijs, J., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 670 Gnedin, N. Y. 1996, ApJ, 456, 1 Heger, A., Langer, N., & Woosley, S. E. 2000, ApJ, 528, 368 Heger, A. & Langer, N. 2000, ApJ, 544, 1016 Heger, A. & Woosley, S. E. 2001, astro-ph/0107037 Houck, J. C., & Fransson, C. 1996, ApJ, 456, 811 Imbriani, G., Limongi, M., Gialanella, L., et al. 2001, ApJ, 558, 903 Iwamoto, K., Nomoto, K., Hoflich, P., et al. 1994, ApJ 437, L115 Iwamoto, K., Mazzali, P.A., Nomoto, K., et al. 1998, Nature 395, 672 Iwamoto, K. 1999a, ApJ, 512, L47 Iwamoto, K. 1999b, ApJ, 517, L67 Iwamoto, K., Takayoshi, N., Nomoto, K., et al. 2000, ApJ, 534, 660 Jehin, E., Magain, P., Neuforge, C., et al. 1999, A&A, 341, 241 King, J. R. 1994, ApJ, 436, 331 King, J. R. 2000, AJ, 120, 1056 Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada F. 1999, ApJ, 522, 82 Kozma, C., & Fransson, C. 1998, ApJ, 497, 431 Liebendorfer, M., Mezzacappa, A., Thielemann, F.-K., et al. 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 6310, 3004 MacFadyen, A. I., Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2001, ApJ, 550, 410 Maeder, A. 1992, A&A, 264, 105 Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 143 Magain, P. 1989, A&A, 209, 211 McWilliam, A., Preston, G. W., Sneden, C., & Searle, L. 1995, AJ, 109, 2757 Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. 2000, A&A, 361, 101 Mezzacappa, A., Liebendorfer, M., Messer, O. E. B., et al. 2001, Phys. Rev. Letters, 86, 1935 Molaro, P., & Bonifacio, P. 1990, A&A, 236, L5 Molaro, P., & Castelli, F. 1990, A&A, 228, 426 Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., et al. 1999, ApJ, 524, L19 Nakamura, T., Umeda, H., Iwamoto, K., et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 880 Navarro, J. F., & Steinmetz, M. 2000, ApJ, 538, 477 Nissen, P. E., Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., & Gilmore, G. 1994, A&A, 285, 440 Nomoto, K., Hashimoto, M., Tsujimoto, T., et al. 1997, Nucl. Phys., A161, 79c13 Norris, J. E., Peterson, R. C., & Beers, T. C. 1993, ApJ, 415, 797 Pearce, F. R., Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., et. al. 1999, ApJ, 521, L99 Peterson, R. C., Kurucz, R. L., & Carney, B. W. 1990, ApJ, 350, 173 Primas, F., Molaro, P., & Castelli, F., 1994 A&A, 290, 885 Rampp, M., & Janka, H.-T. 2000, ApJ, 539, L33 Rauscher, T., Heger, A., Hoffman, R. D. & Woosley S. E. 2002, astro-ph/0112478 Rebolo, R., et al. 2002, in preparation Ryan, S. G., Norris, J. E., & Bessell, M. S. 1991, AJ, 102, 303 Ryan, S. G., Norris, J. E., & Beers, T. C. 1996, ApJ, 471, 254 Samland, M. 1997, ApJ, 496, 155 Searle, L., & Zinn, R. 1978, ApJ, 225, 357 Shigeyama, T., & Nomoto, K. 1990, ApJ, 360, 242 Shigeyama, T., Suzuki, T., Kumagai, S., & Nomoto, K. 1994, ApJ, 420, 341 Shigeyama, T., & Tsujimoto, T. 1998, ApJ, 507, L135 Sneden, C., Preston, G. W., McWilliam, A., & Searle, L. 1994, ApJ, 431, L27 Israelian, G., Garc´ıa L´opez, R. J., & Rebolo, R. 1998, ApJ, Sollerman, J., Kozma, C., Fransson, C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, 507, 805 L127 Israelian, G., Rebolo, R., Garc´ıa L´opez, R. J., et al. 2001, ApJ, 551, 833 Idiart, T., & Th´evenin, F. 2000, ApJ, 541, 207 Spiesman, W. J., & Wallerstein, G. 1991, AJ, 102, 1790 Spite, M., & Spite, F. 1991, A&A, 252, 689 Steinmetz, M., & Muller, E. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 549 20 D. Argast et al.: Implications of O and Mg abundances for stellar iron yields Suntzeff, N. B., & Bouchet, P. 1990, AJ, 99, 650 Suntzeff, N. B., Phillips, M. M., Elias, J. H., et al. 1992, ApJ, 384, L33 Thielemann, F.-K., Hashimoto, M., & Nomoto, K. 1990, ApJ, 349, 222 Thielemann, F.-K., Nomoto, K., & Hashimoto, M. 1996, ApJ, 460, 408 (TH96) Thomas, D., Greggio, L. & Bender, R. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 119 Turatto, M., Mazzali, P. A., Young, T. R. et. al., 1998, ApJ 498, L129 Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181 (WW95)
0709.2915	1	0709	2007-09-18T20:34:04	A Connection between Star Formation in Nuclear Rings and their Host Galaxies	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present results from a photometric H-alpha survey of 22 nuclear rings, aiming to provide insight into their star formation properties, including age distribution, dynamical timescales, star formation rates, and galactic bar influence. We find a clear relationship between the position angles and ellipticities of the rings and those of their host galaxies, which indicates the rings are in the same plane as the disk and circular. We use population synthesis models to estimate ages of each H-alpha emitting HII region, which range from 1 Myr to 10 Myrs throughout the rings. We find that approximately half of the rings contain azimuthal age gradients that encompass at least 25% of the ring, although there is no apparent relationship between the presence or absence of age gradients and the morphology of the rings or their host galaxies. NGC1343, NGC1530, and NGC4321 show clear bipolar age gradients, where the youngest HII regions are located near the two contact points of the bar and ring. We speculate in these cases that the gradients are related to an increased mass inflow rate and/or an overall higher gas density in the ring, which would allow for massive star formation to occur on short timescales, after which the galactic rotation would transport the HII regions around the ring as they age. Two-thirds of the barred galaxies show correlation between the locations of the youngest HII region(s) in the ring and the location of the contact points, which is consistent with predictions from numerical modeling.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A Connection between Star Formation in Nuclear Rings and their Host Galaxies Lisa M. Mazzuca NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 441, Greenbelt, MD 20771 Johan H. Knapen Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna, Spain Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, U.K. Sylvain Veilleux Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218 Michael W. Regan ABSTRACT We present results from a photometric Hα survey of 22 nuclear rings, aiming to provide insight into their star formation properties, including age distribution, dynamical timescales, star formation rates, and galactic bar influence. We find a clear relationship between the position angles and ellipticities of the rings and those of their host galaxies, which indicates the rings are in the same plane as the disk and circular. We use population synthesis models to estimate ages of each Hα-emitting (Hii) region, which range from 1 Myr to 10 Myrs throughout the rings. We find that approximately half of the rings contain azimuthal age gradients that encompass at least 25% of the ring, although there is no apparent relationship between the presence or absence of age gradients and the morphology of the rings or their host galaxies. NGC 1343, NGC 1530, and NGC 4321 show clear bipolar age gradients, where the youngest H ii regions are located near the two contact points of the bar and ring. We speculate in these cases that the gradients are related to an increased mass inflow rate and/or an overall higher gas density in the ring, which would allow for massive star formation to occur on short timescales, after which the galactic rotation would transport the H ii regions around the ring as they age. Two-thirds of the barred galaxies show correlation between the locations of the youngest H ii region(s) in the ring and the location of the contact points, which is consistent with predictions from numerical modeling. -- 2 -- Subject headings: Nuclear Rings, SFR, Barred Galaxies 1. Introduction Nuclear rings are viewed as a type of starburst, consisting of distinct compact areas of young massive stars near the centers of spiral galaxies. The intense bursts, attributed by a Star Formation Rate (SFR) that significantly exceeds the average found among normal galaxies, can dominate the overall star formation in early Hubble type barred spiral galaxies, and dramatically alter the structure of the host galaxy with respect to morphology, gas and dust content, metallicity, and stellar population (e.g., Martinet 1995; Buta & Combes 1996; Kormendy & Kennicutt 2004). Typically located within the central kiloparsec, nuclear rings contain a mixture of neutral and ionized gas and dust with masses of 108 to 1010 M⊙ (Heller & Shlosman 1996; Rubin, Kenney, & Young 1997). The great majority of nuclear rings are found in barred spiral galaxies, where the bar provides essential fuel for the formation and evolution of the ring via shock-induced channel- ing of disk gas to the nuclear regions (e.g., Schwarz 1981; Combes & Gerin 1985; Shlosman, Begelman, & Frank 1990; Athanassoula 1992; Knapen et al. 1995b; Heller & Shlosman 1994; Heller & Shlosman 1996). The shocks can act as instigators for angular momentum loss, which is crucial for directing the gas towards the central regions and forming nuclear rings. In such a picture massive SF would result and be most intense near where the bar dust lanes intersect the ring, called the contact points. The contact points can lead the bar by as much as 90◦ with respect to the galactic rotation (Knapen et al. 1995b; Heller & Shlosman, 1996; Regan, Vogel, & Teuben 1997; Regan et al. 1999; Ryder, Knapen, & Takamiya 2001; Allard, Peletier, & Knapen 2005). While many galaxies with nuclear star-forming rings have been identified (Knapen 2005 states that 20% of local spirals host them), it is hard to generalize on the physical mechanisms behind the triggering and propagation of massive SF due to the inconsistent and incomplete nature of the existing data. To allow for a more statistical approach to answering some of the mysteries of these rings, we performed an imaging survey of 73 galaxies in Hα and the B and I bands, many of which host nuclear rings. An overview of this survey is presented in Knapen et al. (2006; hereafter Paper I). In Paper I we classified the morphology of the nuclear and circumnuclear Hii regions and confirmed that (1) most late-type galaxies have a patchy circumnuclear appearance in Hα, (2) nuclear rings occur primarily in spiral types Sa- Sbc, and (3) found that the presence or absence of a close companion does not significantly affect the Hα morphology around the nucleus nor the strength of the nuclear Hα peak. -- 3 -- Of these 73 galaxies, we identified 22 that host nuclear rings as judged from our Hα images, of which 19 were previously known as such. This paper isolates the individual H ii regions forming the nuclear rings. We present information on the observations and data reduction in Section 2. We derive morphological parameters of the rings using ellipse fitting, and then compare those to the disk characteristics, in Section 3. In Section 4, we identify and analyze the H ii regions forming the rings, compute their equivalent widths (EWs), and estimate error budgets. Using evolutionary models, we convert the EWs of the H ii regions to ages and discuss the assumptions we make with respect to the type of starburst activity occurring in and around the rings in Section 5. We present our age distribution analysis, star formation rate estimations, and a discussion of the stellar bar dynamics with respect to the rings in Section 6, before summarizing our conclusions in Section 7. 2. Observations and Data Reduction The ring images presented here are part of a larger William Herschel Telescope (WHT) imaging survey conducted to characterize the nuclear and circumnuclear morphology in nearby galaxies (Paper I). We selected galaxies with some evidence for Hα structure in their central regions, either from the literature (e.g., Buta & Combes 1996; Buta & Crocker 1993) or from our own past work. We adopted the definition of a nuclear ring, nuclear spiral, and psuedo-ring from Buta & Crocker (1993) in Paper I and follow it here for consistency. Since one of the aims of our overall study is the detailed analysis of nuclear rings, our sample was biased towards SBC galaxies known to host such features. We chose rings with enough structure to analyze, and which are considered to be the brightest feature in the circumnuclear region. Given the nature of our original survey from which the targets were selected, a distance bias is to some extent unavoidable. We recognize the wide range of distances and ring sizes in the sample, and confirm that rings in farther galaxies are larger than those in nearby galaxies. However, since our selection was with respect to the angular size of the ring, we find that there is no correlation of distance to the number of identifiable H ii regions. The images presented in this paper have been obtained using the Auxiliary Port (Aux Port) camera on the 4.2m WHT, operated by the Isaac Newton Group in La Palma. The camera's circular field of view (FOV) is ∼1.′8 in diameter, imaged with a 1024 × 1024 pixel TEK CCD. The angular sizes of the nuclear rings in our sample vary between 5′′ and 30′′, which fit well into the FOV. We used Harris B and I filters, and one of four narrow-band Hα filters, depending on the systemic velocity of the galaxy. We refer the reader to Table 1 of Paper I for a listing of the complete sample, along with their global parameters. Table 1 -- 4 -- of the present paper lists morphological type, ring ellipticity, position angle (PA) of the disk and bar, and derived ring size for our subsample of 22 galactic nuclear rings as identified in Paper I. We observed spectrophotometric standards to calibrate the Hα images, and photometric standards to calibrate the B and I band images. We observed the standards through the same filters as the galaxies, with exposure times ranging from 5 to 20 seconds. The instrumental magnitude of each star in each filter was obtained using the IRAF package phot. This pho- tometry package calculates the magnitude, among other parameters, based on user-defined values for the radius and annulus of a sky aperture. To convert from instrumental magni- tude to AB magnitude for the spectrophotometric standard stars, an interpolation method was used based on results from Oke (1990). Oke defines values of AB at points where no ambiguity exists for instrument calibration problems due to spectral resolution. Therefore, to obtain magnitudes for the filters used in our survey, magnitudes with respect to the wave- lengths just above and below the interested filter wavelength were chosen. Interpolating between these values yields the absolute magnitude for the five Hα filters. The resulting integrated fluxes of the rings (on the order of 10−12 − 10−14 erg s−1cm−2) and luminosities of the H ii regions (on the order of 1038 − 1040 erg s−1; see Appendix A) are consistent with published data (e.g., Pogge 1989; Storchi-Bergmann, Wilson, & Baldwin 1996; Regan et al. 1996; Sheth et al. 2000). 3. Ring Morphology We fitted the nuclear rings of the 22 galaxies with the IRAF task ellipse. We obtained the central position of each ring from the peak in the I-band image, and fixed the center while iteratively fitting elliptical isophotes to the Hα image. We masked out the nucleus and foreground stars that could affect the fitting process, and provided initial estimates of the major axis length, ellipticity, and PA. The task produced measurements of the azimuthally integrated intensity, observed ellipticity, and PA of the ring major axis as a function of radius. We determined the best-fitting ellipse, which corresponded to the peak isophotal intensity across the radial range of the ring (see Table 1). Figure 1 shows the resulting fits of the 22 rings, overlaid on the Hα images. The pixel-based ring diameters produced from ellipse were converted to arcseconds and kiloparsecs (see Table 1, Columns 5 & 6, respectively). The rings vary in major axis from 0.2 kpc to 1.7 kpc, which is typical for nuclear rings (Buta & Crocker 1993). In most cases, the galaxy distance was obtained from the Nearby Galaxies Catalog (Tully 1988); in the cases where there were no catalog values recorded, we computed them by dividing the recessional velocity by the Hubble constant (taken at 75 km s−1 Mpc−1) -- 5 -- -- see Paper I for details. Table 1 lists the parameters of the isophote best representing each ring, chosen on the basis of the peak isophotal intensity across the radial range of the ring. We compare the ellipticity and PA of each ring to that of its host disk. Disk ellipticities and PAs are from the RC3, with the exception of the values for NGC 1530, which are based on the kinematical data of Regan et al. (1996). Figure 2 compares the PAs and ellipticities of the rings to their host disks. The plots show a clear linear relationship between the ring and its host disk with respect to both PA and ellipticity. This indicates that the rings are in the same plane as the disk and are nearly circular when deprojected. In some cases (NGC 278, NGC 4303, NGC 4314, IC 1438, and NGC 7742) the disk is nearly circular; those galaxies are seen face-on and do not appear in Figure 2. The disk morphology in these cases is consistent with that of the rings, which all have very low ellipticities (less than 0.1). The only exception to this general statement is NGC 7570 whose ring PA and ellipticity differ significantly from those of the disk. The ring appears to be nearly face-on so the PA of the chosen isophotal fit may not be reliable. However, the disk high inclination (i=54◦; RC3) is not consistent with the observed nearly circular ring. This strongly suggests that the ring is not in the same plane as the disk. 4. Equivalent Widths of Hii Regions in Nuclear Rings 4.1. Identification of Hii Regions To identify the individual H ii regions forming a given ring, we used the program SEx- tractor (Bertin & Arnouts 1996), which builds a catalog of H ii regions and their associated fluxes from an astronomical image. The various parameters used allow for the detection of H ii regions even at very low Hα intensities. We masked out the nucleus and extraneous stars that were clearly not part of the ring. The catalog file produced by the program records the position, area, and flux of each H ii region detected. Figure 3 shows the outlines of the fitted H ii regions overlaid on the continuum subtracted Hα images. In the case of NGC 7469, SExtractor was unable to identify any H ii regions due to poor spatial resolution com- pared to the small angular size of the ring. This galaxy is well known to contain a nuclear ring of 0.′′5 in radius (Genzel et al. 1995; Davies, Tacconi, & Genzel 2004; D´ıaz-Santos et al.2007), which is consistent with our ellipse results (Section 3). The lack of sufficient spatial resolution in our images, however, prevents us from continuing with the analysis of the individual H ii regions in the ring, but we refer to above citations for a detailed study of its SF properties, based on high-resolution imaging and near-IR spectroscopy. To obtain EWs of the H ii regions, we measure fluxes in both the I-band and Hα. We -- 6 -- do this by first imposing the position and shape of the apertures from the SExtractor analysis of the Hα image onto the I-band image, making use of the fact that these images have already been registered (see Paper I). We then run SExtractor in its two-image mode to obtain the corresponding I-band fluxes. Among the many parameters to be defined in SExtractor, two are of particular importance, namely the initial box size for the H ii region detections, and the threshold value used to determine the extent of an individual H ii region. For the first parameter we chose a value corresponding to the average seeing value in our images, namely 8 pixels or 0.′′9. For the threshold value, we chose twice the standard deviation, σ, of the combined galaxy and sky background across the whole image. We confirmed our parameter settings by independently varying the threshold value and box size and comparing the resulting ring morphology and EWs to our "reference" values, which were best representative of the morphology seen in the Hα images. Several test cases were run by altering each parameter (fixing one parameter while modifying the other) by ±50% of the reference values. Figure 4 shows the resulting images for NGC 1343, as a representative example. Figures 4a and 4b are the result of fixing the threshold and altering the box size. Modifying the box size by ±50% of the reference value (8×8 pixel box) to a 12×12 box and 4×4 box, respectively, causes a significant change in the visual appearance of the H ii regions. Increasing the box size results in an obvious over-blending of the H ii regions, with the opposite occurring when decreasing the box size. Figures 4c and 4d of Figure 4 are the products of modifying the threshold by ±50% of the reference value (2σ), to 1.33σ and 3σ, respectively. Changing the threshold in either direction causes a significant change in the number of H ii region detections forming the ring. Overall, the isophotal detection area is more sensitive to the box size, while the number of detections is more sensitive to the threshold. For small variations of the threshold, the majority of the detected regions remained in tact. Added detections were either as a result of further segmenting an already- defined region or adding a new region that was now above the noise level. These parameters are important since the background to be subtracted from the I-band and Hα data is locally defined by SExtractor for each H ii region, and includes both the sky background and the emission from the galactic disk. In general, this empirical analysis gives us confidence that our parameter choices do indeed best represent the H ii region morphologies. 4.2. Equivalent Widths To obtain EWs for the individual H ii regions, the Hα flux was divided by the I-band flux within the same aperture as defined by SExtractor. We describe below some of the intricacies of the EW determination. We specifically discuss the correction of those cases -- 7 -- where the I-band flux of an H ii region is particularly low, as well as the error budget of the EW values. 4.2.1. Negative I-band Fluxes Many of the galaxies in our sample (16 out of 20) contained H ii regions whose I-band emission was lower than the background due to noise. This resulted in negative I-band fluxes, which are unphysical and cannot be used to determine the EW. Rather than changing either the H ii region aperture or specific SExtractor parameters, we chose to use a physically meaningful upper limit to the I-band flux. We did this by taking, for all galaxies, the lowest I-band flux per pixel (fmin) of all of the H ii regions. Analyzing the values per pixel versus per region avoids the possible bias introduced by the large range of region sizes, which vary by as much as a factor of two in a given ring. We conservatively assume the lowest value to be representative of a 6σ deviation from the mean. Where fmin is negative, we correct any I-band flux per pixel lower than the value fcorr = 1 2fmin (equivalent to a 3σ adjustment) to have a corrected H ii region flux Fcorr = fcorr × area. This method, thus, applies a correction to those H ii regions whose emission is positive but very low. See Appendix A for details on individual H ii region corrections. To estimate the impact of the 3σ corrections on the EWs, we also corrected these fluxes to a lower level, namely 1 3fmin (equivalent to a 2σ adjustment). The maximum impact on EW that we found in such cases was an increase in EW of order 0.2 in log(EW), although in many cases the difference was less than 0.1. In 10 out of the 16 galaxies affected by negative I-band emission, 5%, on average, of the H ii regions subject to the 3σ correction would not be subject to a 2σ correction. That is, those H ii regions with very low positive I-band emission that were changed using the 3σ discriminator were no longer affected when compared to the 2σ value. The other six galaxies were entirely unaffected by the correction change and can therefore be considered more reliable. We present these findings in Figure 5 using a 3σ correction. Regions whose I-band flux was changed to the 3σ value but was unaffected by the 2σ comparison are labeled as a diamond with a cross; these represent lower-limits in the log(EW) since we find that these values would have increased if we had chosen a 2σ correction. All other H ii regions with corrected I-band fluxes, including the ones that were negative, are labeled as open diamonds. Those H ii regions where no corrections were needed are labeled as filled diamonds, and we consider those the most reliable. -- 8 -- 4.2.2. Characterizing the Uncertainties We estimate typical uncertainties in the EW values by considering uncertainties due to background subtraction and H ii region detection, which both result from the application of SExtractor. Additional contributions to the overall error budget will come from measure- ment errors in the standard stars, the calibration uncertainties associated with our method of continuum subtraction (see Paper I), and in the filter response curves, but we will assume that they are negligible compared to the two main contributors. To make a conservative estimate of the uncertainty in the background subtraction we consider the I-band backgrounds. These will be more affected than the Hα measurements because (1) the background is higher in I than in Hα, (2) the contrast between the H ii region and background is much smaller than in Hα, and (3) the basic morphology of an H ii region has been set by its Hα appearance in the I-band. From our analysis of the negative residual I-band fluxes, we know that the maximum difference in the log of the EW between the two cases (i.e., applying a 2σ versus 3σ correction to the affected measurements) is 0.2. Such a difference of log(EW)=0.2 corresponds to a factor of 1.5 difference in the I-background subtracted before measuring the flux of an H ii region, where log(EW)=0.1 would correspond to a factor of 1.3. Even considering the small field of view of our I-band images, these factors cover the uncertainty in the determination of the background. The other main contributor of the EW uncertainties is in the flux measurement of the H ii regions. An RMS value, based on Gaussian noise statistics, is associated with each detection. On average, we estimate the RMS to be 5% of the detection, which equates to 0.02 in the log of the EW. This constant RMS value is due to the fact that both flux and source size play a role in the noise (e.g., detections with weaker fluxes cover smaller areas). We thus arrive at a conservative error budget consisting of two components, 0.2 and 0.02 in the log(EW). These combine in a worst case scenario to a factor of 1.6, or an error budget in log(EW) of 0.2. We take 3σ of the total error budget as a guideline for discriminating between EWs (and thus H ii regions). As a consequence, two EW values must be 0.6 apart in the log to make them significantly different. Whereas this is by all means a large uncertainty, Figure 5 shows that the values can range by as much as 3 in the log for a given ring during the evolution of massive stars so that, in fact, most of our measurements lead to straightforward and believable conclusions on at least relative ages, as discussed in Section 6.1. We stress that the error budget determined here is a very conservative one, and that for most H ii regions the actual uncertainty will typically be significantly smaller. -- 9 -- 5. Age Dating We use Starburst99 (Leitherer et al. 1999) stellar population modeling to estimate the age of the individual H ii regions. The models present the time evolution of the EW(Hα) for varying IMF properties and metallicities, which will affect the evolution of the population. Figure 6 shows the time evolution of EW(Hα) for both an instantaneous starburst (i.e., all stars are formed simultaneously in an instantaneous starburst episode) and a continuous starburst (i.e., the star formation rate is constant in time). While the starburst choice can greatly affect the determination of the ages of the population greater than ∼5 Myr, it is not clear which model best represents the stellar activity in nuclear rings. Since active massive star formation is prevalent in H ii regions, adopting an instantaneous burst would seem to fit the model predictions of younger ages better over the range of 1Myr - 10Myr. If, on the other hand, there is an abundant supply of gas entering the ring, starbursts may be a composite of episodic bursts (Elmegreen 1997; Allard et al. 2006; Sarzi et al. 2007). Star formation in the ring would cyclically enter an active starburst period until it exhausts the surrounding gas supply, and then cease star formation until enough gas sparks a new starburst period. Figure 7 shows Starburst99 model curves for an instantaneous and a continuous star- burst with different IMF slopes, mass cut-offs, and metallicities. We vary the IMFs in both scenarios and find that the evolution model is not very sensitive to the upper limit masses (i.e., 30 M⊙ and 100 M⊙) or the IMF slopes (α = 2.35, 3.3), especially in the instanta- neous starburst case. The models also confirm that high metallicity H ii regions show lower EW(Hα) while low metallicity regions have invariably high EW(Hα). Regardless of the metallicity or type of burst, however, we find that all of the predicted evolution curves show a significant monotonic drop of EW with increasing age. Moreover, the variation shown in the model curves (Fig. 7) is most likely an overestimate of the real variations in the nuclear rings under consideration here. For instance, Allard et al. (2006) and Sarzi et al. (2007) found Solar metallicity values for all nuclear rings in their sample, and there is no convincing evidence for changes in either the IMF slope or upper mass cutoff, except possibly in rather extreme environments such as the Galactic Center (e.g., reviews from Elmegreen 2002 and Kroupa 2002). Since we are more interested in the relative age difference from one H ii region to the next, the sharply declining curve (in either starburst case) allows for an unambiguous discussions of age gradients. We adopted an instantaneous stellar starburst with a Salpeter (1955) IMF between Mlow = 1 M⊙ and Mup = 100 M⊙, and a solar metallicity, which is a good predictor for circumnuclear regions of barred galaxies (Allard et al. 2006). -- 10 -- 6. Discussion 6.1. Age Distribution The results from SExtractor were used to map the ages of each H ii region according to their azimuthal location in the ring. The right panels of Figure 5 show the resolved H ii regions, which are color-coded according to age, in terms of EW. We assigned the physical center of the ring (as computed with ellipse) to be (0,0), and viewed an H ii region's azimuthal position in a counter-clockwise rotation from North to East. The color ranges are unique to each ring and, thus, do not denote the same EWs for all rings. Although we did not deproject the rings, all H ii regions have a unique position, which allows us to search for any unambiguous distribution patterns. The PA of the major axes of the ring and the bar are indicated in the image. To complement the images, plots are shown in the left panels, which graph the log(EW) versus PA, and again indicate the PAs of the ring and bar major axes. We use B − I color index maps, shown in Figure 8, as morphological indicators of the ring kinematics. These maps provide direct tracers of the bar dust lanes, which show the flow of gas to the ring. In the cases where the dust lanes were present, the azimuthal direction of the ring rotation was consistent with that of the galaxy in all cases. The contact points of the dust lanes with the ring are clearly visible in most of our images and indicate an offset of ∼90◦ between the contact points and the bar (see Section 6.3 for details). The dust lanes also show directional flow around the ring, assuming that rotation continues in the same direction as seen with the bar dust lanes and spiral arms. The adopted rotational direction of the rings is listed in Table 2 and indicated for each ring containing a bar in Figure 5. We find that several galaxies, both barred and non-barred, exhibit relative azimuthal age gradients within the ring, as also observed by Ryder, Knapen, & Takamiya (2001) and Allard et al. (2006) for NGC 4321. We only consider age gradients over a significant portion of the ring (greater than 25% of the ring) with amplitudes that exceed the uncertainties for differentiating between points over the range of interest. We highlight our findings below, and summarize the characterization of the age distributions for all of the rings (e.g., azimuthal gradient, radial gradient, flat distribution, or no recognizable pattern) in Table 3 (Column 2). • NGC 278 (Fig. 5a): The entire ring as seen in Hα is very small in size (0.2 kpc in radius) with 20 individual H ii regions detected that comprise the ring. This ring is the smallest one recognized in the galaxy; a second "outer" nuclear ring appears at ∼ 1 kpc and is discussed in detail in Knapen et al. (2004). This outer ring is considered 'non-standard' as it is very wide, and more a region of star formation with rather abrupt delimitations -- 11 -- on the inner and outer radial range. In addition to this, we were in practice unable to derive a recognizable ring pattern of H ii regions using SExtractor, and have thus opted for concentrating on the inner nuclear ring. The host galaxy does not contain a bar in the optical nor near-IR wavelengths (Knapen et al. 2004). There is a decrease in the log(EW) (i.e., an increase in age) over approximately one third of the inner ring ranging from the positions of the H ii regions centered at azimuth 124◦ to 236◦. This indicates a counterclockwise rotation within the ring. A radial gradient spans the same range, with the younger H ii regions lying on the inner side of the ring. A similar pattern, although not as clearly defined, appears over the range of 12◦ to 100◦. • NGC 473 (Fig. 5b): Two-thirds of the ring can be seen in the Hα image, defined by 27 H ii regions. A galactic bar exists at a major axis PA of 164◦ along the major axis. The bar dust lanes indicate a counterclockwise flow of material around the ring. There is a sharply sloped age gradient over the range of 38◦ to 203◦ from younger to older, respectively. • NGC 613 (Fig. 5c): There exists a small partial nuclear ring containing 11 individual star-forming H ii regions with a strong nucleus. A fairly flat distribution in the log(EW) appears around the entire ring with ages averaging no less than 10 Myrs. The galactic bar is located at PA = 110◦ along its major axis. Although a gradient is not defined, one of the contact points (at 200◦) coincides within 5◦ to the youngest hotspot (PA = 205◦) in its respective hemisphere. • NGC 1300 (Fig. 5d): Twelve H ii regions form a small complete ring in Hα although there is no clear pattern in EWs. • NGC 1343 (Fig. 5e): The ring in this barred spiral galaxy is seen as complete in Hα with 20 resolved H ii regions. The mapping of EW to H ii region location indicates a clear bi-polar age pattern around the ring with EW maxima (i.e., relative youngest age in the ring) at PA = 140 and 309◦. There is a distinct age gradient approximately from one contact point to the other contact point (located at 172◦ and 352◦, respectively), where the age increases counterclockwise from the bar contact points. • NGC 1530 (Fig. 5f): Three-quarters of the ring can be seen in Hα containing 9 distinct H ii regions. The galaxy has a large bar at PA = 122◦ and two open spiral arms originating from its ends, rotating clockwise. We find bipolar age gradients, one in each hemisphere, as bisected by the position of the bar. The youngest H ii regions are near the bar PA, (i.e., not the contact points) over the range of 283◦ to 207◦ and 115◦ to 7◦, with the ring rotation also clockwise. Half of the ring is distinctly younger than the other half, where the turnover points coincide with the ring major axis PA (= 25◦). -- 12 -- • NGC 4303 (Fig. 5g): Only seven H ii regions define the small ring. The ring is observed to be three-quarters complete in Hα with bipolar age maxima at PA = 114◦ and 304◦. There are no obvious age gradients in between the maxima, but the latter are offset by less than 25◦ from the bar contact points (100◦ and 280◦). • NGC 4314 (Fig. 5h): The small ring consists of 10 H ii regions showing a smooth and well-defined age gradient. The age gradient flows from older to younger in the same direction as the presumed ring rotation (clockwise). The youngest H ii region is within 20◦ of one of the contact points (PA = 45◦). • NGC 4321 (Fig. 5i): The well resolved full ring contains 57 detected H ii regions. Because missing data prevent the calculation of Hα equivalent widths and ages, we refer to Allard et al. (2006) for a similar analysis in Hβ. They find a bipolar age gradient corresponding to the ring PA (at 170◦ and 350◦) and the location of the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere. The age increases in a counter-clockwise direction along the direction of flow in the ring. • NGC 5248 (Fig. 5j): Nineteen H ii regions define the full, elliptically shaped ring. The youngest H ii region is located 4◦ away from of one of the bar contact points (PA = 47◦). • NGC 5728 (Fig. 5k): Eighteen H ii regions define the partial ring, which is three- quarters complete. A very steep but small gradient exists from PA = 147◦ to PA = 98◦ from younger to older, according to the clockwise directional flow of the ring. One contact point (PA = 303◦) is within 2◦ of the youngest H ii region in the ring. The second youngest H ii region (PA = 147◦) is within 24◦ of the second contact point (PA = 123◦), although it does precede that contact point. • NGC 5905 (Fig. 5l): The ring is small but complete in Hα. It consists of nine H ii regions and is relatively flat with respect to age (except for one H ii region). There appears to be no correlation in age with respect to the bar contact points. • NGC 5945 (Fig. 5m): Only three H ii regions define this patchy ring, which contains low EW values (all less than 1.5 in the log). Buta & Crocker (1993) indicate a nuclear ring, but our images do not have enough resolution to confirm this. • NGC 5953 (Fig. 5n): The non-barred galaxy has a nuclear ring that appears complete with 23 H ii regions. Although we know of no bar to directly fuel the ring, it is well formed and resolved both azimuthally and radially. • NGC 6503 (Fig. 5o): The elliptically shaped ring contains 84 resolved H ii regions in this unbarred spiral. No gradients are evident. -- 13 -- • NGC 6951 (Fig. 5p): The ring is small but complete with eight detected H ii regions. The youngest H ii region (PA = 339◦) is within 16◦ of its respective contact point. The ages steeply increase (by a factor of 10) from 339◦ to 218◦ in a clockwise direction, consistent with the directional flow of the galaxy. • NGC 7217 (Fig. 5q): The ring is three-quarters complete in Hα. Twenty-two H ii regions were detected in the ring of this unbarred galaxy. Ages increase in a clockwise direction from PA = 109◦ to PA = 6◦ . • IC 1438 (Fig. 5r): This barred galaxy hosts a complete ring with 11 H ii regions detected. There exists an increasing age gradient from PA = 32◦ to PA = 211◦ in a counterclockwise direction. This direction is consistent with the ring rotational flow. The youngest H ii region is within 2◦ of its respective bar contact point (PA = 304◦) • NGC 7570 (Fig. 5s): Eighteen H ii regions comprise a mostly complete ring in this barred galaxy. An increasing age gradient ranges counterclockwise from PA = 112◦ to PA = 295◦. There is also a radial gradient spanning the same range as the azimuthal gradient, with two distinct arcs at nearly identical slopes, and where the inner arc appears consistently older than the outer one. No correlation to the bar contact points is evident. • NGC 7716 (Fig. 5t): Thirty H ii regions form a complete ring in this barred galaxy. No gradients or correlations to the bar are observed. • NGC 7742 (Fig. 5u): The circular and well resolved ring contains 38 H ii regions. No gradients are observed. While many of the rings contain age gradients, a few show no gradient, namely NGC 613, NGC 5905, and NGC 5945. This type of distribution is qualitatively more consistent with Elmegreen's (1994) predictions, which suggest that the massive star formation in the nuclear ring is shocked into existence due to gravitational instabilities in the nuclear region around the ILRs. Therefore, age gradients would not exist. Comparisons of EW to age for these three rings also indicate that these starbursts are relatively older than those seen in the other rings, on the order of 10 Myrs and higher. Elmegreen (1997) suggests that these rings (i.e., with no gradient) could last for as long as 100 Myrs before SF ceases if the inflowing gas rate is high enough. The SFRs of these three rings (2M⊙/yr, 2M⊙/yr, and 4M⊙/yr, respectively; see Section 6.2 and Table 1 for SFR and inflow discussion) are among the higher values in our sample but are consistent with other rates documented (Regan et al. 1997; Jogee et al. 2002). If we take into account that NGC 613 and NGC 5945 are partial rings in the optical, then the SFRs calculated here are lower limits. -- 14 -- 6.2. Inflow and Star Formation Rates In this Section we explore possible reasons for the result that only three galaxies show bi-polar age gradients around their rings, whereas many of the rings (9 of 22) show partial gradients along 25% - 30% of their rings, with the rest (10 of 22) showing no gradient. We find no apparent relationships between the presence or absence of age gradients and the morphology of the rings or their host galaxies. For example, whereas NGC 4321, with its bi-polar age gradient, has a pair of well-defined dust lanes coming into the ring through the bar, NGC 1300 and NGC 5248 have similar dust lane morphologies yet show no gradients. Some of the poorly resolved rings, such as those in NGC 4303 or NGC 5945, do not show gradients, but given the presence of measured age gradients in the comparably small rings in NGC 6951 and IC 1438, the lack of spatial resolution in the former two cannot easily be used as an argument for the lack of a gradient. But even if we ignore galaxies with either small and badly resolved rings, or rings that do not have the classical aspect of dynamically- induced resonance rings (NGC 613 and NGC 6503 are in the latter category), we are left with a significant number of rings in which we should have detected gradients if present, but which for some reason do not show any. This category includes, for instance, NGC 1300, very similar to NGC 4314 or NGC 6951 which do show gradients (all compact well-defined rings with around a dozen H ii regions, sitting in strong bars with well-defined sets of dust lanes); NGC 5248, similar to NGC 4321 (complex, rich rings with many H ii regions organized into spiral arms fragments and hosted by a relatively weak bar); NGC 7716, similar to NGC 7217 which does have a gradient; and NGC 7742. For those rings that contain a gradient we also find no correlation between the presence of the gradient and direction of the ring rotation. In relating the location of the youngest H ii regions to those of the contact points between the dust lanes and ring, we have been assuming that massive SF will follow very rapidly once the inflowing gas joins the ring. The appearance of a gradient in the ring may thus depend on whether or not material flowing in will immediately trigger gravitational collapse, and initiate massive SF. This in turn may be due to either a higher mass inflow rate (or possibly increased clumpiness of the inflow) and/or an overall higher existing gas density in the ring. Each of these possibilities will ensure that soon after a clump of inflowing gas joins the ring, it will start to form massive stars. The alternatives, of low inflow rate and/or overall low gas density in the ring, might lead to a more gradual increase of the gas density, without necessarily leading to immediate gravitational collapse and massive SF on short timescales. In this case, the positions of the H ii regions would bear no relation to the locations of the contact points. The ring would, in such a case, merely increase its gas density gradually, until at some stage, somewhere along the ring, an individual clump would become unstable to collapse; therefore, no age gradients would ensue. -- 15 -- To test this simple model, we must first consider the quantities mentioned above, gas inflow rate and gas density in the ring. These can in principle be determined from inter- ferometric CO measurements, but the process is not straightforward. The main issues are the conversion factor of LCO to MH2 (the X-factor), which may well not be equal to the canonical value in the kind of environments we consider here, and the determination of the fractions of detected molecular gas which are in fact flowing into the ring rather than around it (as a consequence of a "spray-type" flow, see, e.g., Regan, Vogel & Teuben 1997; Jogee et al. 2002), or with the right physical conditions such as velocity dispersion and clumpiness to take part in the massive SF process. So although CO interferometry has been presented for seven of our nuclear rings in the literature (by Regan, Vogel & Teuben 1997; Sakamoto et al. 1999; Jogee et al. 2002, 2005; Helfer et al. 2003; Combes et al. 2004; Garc´ıa-Burillo et al. 2005), we will not attempt here to derive the gas inflow rate and gas density in the ring from this collection of data, all with different observational characteristics. For two of our rings, NGC 1530 and NGC 5248, gas inflow rates have been explicitly determined in the literature. M = 1 M⊙ yr−1, whereas Jogee For the former galaxy, Regan et al. (1997) give a value of et al. (2002) determine a value of "a few" M⊙ yr−1 for the latter galaxy. Considering the uncertainties in these values, we can say little more than that they are consistent with the SFRs determined for our nuclear rings (see discussion below, and values in Table 1). We could assume that the SFR of the ring can act as a tracer of the inflow rate, although that would imply assuming, for instance, that inflowing gas is transformed into massive stars on very short timescales. If we do this, we would expect the age gradients to occur in those galaxies with the higher SFRs, which would be representative of higher gas inflow rates. In contrast, lower SFRs would indicate a low inflow rate so that the gas will gradually fill the ring, leading to SF only if and when the local gas density leads to gravitational collapse. This will occur essentially at random and thus result in a ring with no gradients. Kennicutt (1998) derives a relation between the Hα ionizing flux and the SFR for normal disk star forming galaxies, where the conversion factor is computed using stellar population synthesis modeling. Since only stars with masses larger than 10 M⊙ and lifetimes less than 20 Myr dominate the integrated ionizing flux, the Hα emission line provides a nearly instantaneous and linear measure of the SFR, independent of the previous star formation history. For solar abundances and our adopted IMF (α = 2.35; Mlow = 1 M⊙ and Mup = 100 M⊙), we can use Kennicutt's (1998) equation: SFR(M⊙ yr−1) = 7.9 × 10−42 L(Hα) (erg s−1). to compute SFRs integrated over the entire ring, which are given in column 10 of Table 1. Variable extinction certainly adds uncertainty in the computation of the SFR for cir- -- 16 -- cumnuclear regions. From the B − I images, the patchiness of the extinction is very clear in several of our galaxies (e.g., NGC 473, NGC 613, NGC 1530, NGC 5945), which reveal only partial rings in Hα. The less obscured regions will contribute more heavily to the line fluxes in these cases. The B − I images clearly indicate that while the dust lanes can be traced nicely in the bar inmost cases (where there is little star formation), the appearance of the nuclear rings is dominated by blue star-forming regions. This type of morphology makes it difficult to precisely model the effect of the dust, but attempts have been made for nuclear regions in particular. Osmer, Smith, & Weedman (1974) analyzed six galaxies and derived integrated extinction values across the entire circumnuclear region ranging from AHα ≈ 2.5 − 3 mag, while Hummel, van der Hulst & Keel (1987) found an extinction of AHα ≈ 1.1 in the central region of NGC 1097. Kennicutt (1998) acknowledges the high un- certainty and estimates that the errors in the SFR can be as high as ±50%. A high-resolution survey paper by Phillips (1996) for nine circumnuclear regions confirms the potential for high uncertainty values. Following Kennicutt, he finds that the SFRs vary by as much as a factor of ten when applying extinctions of AHα=1.1 and AHα=3.4 mag. He concludes that circum- nuclear SF can be a dominant factor to the overall rates of such galaxies. We thus place the same caution that our SFRs contain potentially high uncertainties due to variable extinction throughout the nuclear rings. Although there are possible large uncertainties in the SFR due to extinction, using the SFR can provide a possible link to an explanation for the existence of age gradients, via the gas inflow rate. Figure 9 plots the integrated SFR over the entire ring for all galaxies and distinguishes those rings that show a gradient and those that do not. There is no obvious correlation between the SFR and the appearance of a gradient, although we cannot exclude that such a connection does exist but is obscured by high dust extinction. The average mean for those without gradients (SFR = 3.6 ± 1.1 M⊙ yr−1, where the uncertainty is the standard error) is slightly larger for those with a gradient (SFR = 2.2 ± 0.7 M⊙ yr−1), but given the large mean deviations, we cannot distinguish in a statistical sense between the two cases. This could be due to several factors. All of the gradients, except for those in NGC 1343 and NGC 4321, are partial gradients. That is, their gradient does not range continually from one contact point to the next. NGC 1343 and NGC 4321, which represent the"ideal" scenario, do have high SFRs (6.8 M⊙ yr−1 for both cases) when compared to the rest of the sample. Computing the average SFR of the ring also is insensitive to the steepness of the gradient, the size of the ring, the size of the individual H ii regions, or the patchiness of the ring, which all add complexity to the interpretation of the data. From our analysis of age gradients we thus conclude that although age gradients along the ring are detected in more than half of the rings, all other rings show random variations of H ii region EW, and thus age, with azimuth. We cannot pinpoint any morphological -- 17 -- parameters that might distinguish the host galaxies and bars of those rings with from those without gradients. Another strong conclusion from our analysis is that the kind of clear bi-polar age gradient seen before in NGC 4321 (Ryder, Knapen, & Takamiya 2001; Allard et al. 2006) is rare - we only see a similar bi-polar gradient in one more galaxy, NGC 1343. It is not clear why these two galaxies show their gradients, whereas other galaxies with very similar bar-ring systems show gradients that are not bi-polar, or no gradients at all. 6.3. Nuclear Ring and Stellar Bar Dynamics It is agreed that the presence of a galactic bar can have significant influence on angular momentum and re-distribution of gas, including inflow towards the central regions (e.g., Combes & Gerin 1985; Athanassoula 1992, 2000; Knapen et al. 1995a; Heller & Shlosman 1996; Maciejewski et al. 2002). Observed kinematics reveal that the shock-induced flows move gas radially inwards along the bar dust lanes and tend to collect at the intersection of the dust lanes with the ring. These contact points are thought to be approximately perpendicular (within the plane of the disk) to the PA of the bar major axis (Regan & Teuben 2003) but have been seen to lead the bar by as little as 60◦ in numerical models (Heller & Shlosman 1996). The pile up of gas at these two points in the ring can be expected to spark SF. Therefore, one could predict to find the youngest stellar H ii regions in the ring near the contact points. For the barred spiral galaxies in our sample, we compare the location of the youngest H ii regions in the ring to the derived location of the contact points. We first identified the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere, where the hemispheres are separated by the bar PA. Taking into account the direction of flow around the ring (from our B − I images), we calculate the PA offset between the H ii region and the contact points. Table 2 shows the PAs of both the contact point and the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere, along with the directional flow of the ring. We find that in two-thirds of the galaxies, one of the bar contact points is aligned with the youngest H ii region in the associated hemisphere within 20◦ of the contact point. Two galaxies, NGC 4314 and NGC 5248, have the youngest H ii region in both hemispheres aligned with the contact points. Our results for both of these rings are consistent with those of Benedict et al. (2002) and Maoz et al. (2001), respectively, who also find that the youngest stars were located at the contact points. Figure 10 shows a histogram of the distribution of the angular offsets between the bar major axis and the locations of the two youngest Hii regions in each ring. A peak in frequency around the contact point locations is seen. We next calculate the times from the bar major axis PA to the location of the contact -- 18 -- points with those of the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere, assuming we azimuthally move in the direction of ring flow. We compute the period of the rings using measurements of the ring radius and the rotational velocity at the ring radius. We chose the major axis length of each ring as derived from ellipse (see Section 3 and Table 1), and obtained the rotational velocity values from the literature and from our own DensePak IFU data taken in 2003 & 2004 (L. M. Mazzuca et al. 2006, in prep.). Table 3 shows the major axis ring radius, the adopted rotational velocity along with its reference, and the period for each ring. Since we predict the contact points to be ∼90◦ from the bar major axis, we can compute their location with respect to the bar PA in each hemisphere, and thus calculate the amount of time it would take to travel to that location. We compare this travel time to that associated with the location of the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere. Overall, the expected travel times to the contact points coincide with the times computed from the bar PA to the youngest H ii regions, which further strengthens the theory that the youngest H ii regions are located near the contact points. We find only one H ii region, in NGC 1530, that deviates from the general trend. In this case, the youngest region in one of the hemispheres is more aligned with the PA of the ring than that of the bar. The analysis described above considers merely the rotational velocity of the gas in the ring region while deriving travel times. There is an additional contribution from the bar, which rotates with a certain bar pattern speed (assuming that the ring co-rotates with the bar). Estimating the relative contributions of these two rotation components, we consider parameters for a typical ring in our sample (see Table 1) of rring = 0.5 kpc, Ωp,bar = 40 km s−1 kpc−1, and vrot = 150,km s−1, which yields a ratio of the contributions of circular to bar pattern speeds into the velocities around the ring of (40 × 0.5)/150. Given that the rotational velocity is dominant, that the uncertainties in determining the bar pat- tern speed (and, in fact, the direction of bar rotation) are significant (see Elmegreen 1996 and Knapen 1999 for reviews), and that the uncertainties from other sources, as described above, in the determination of travel times around the ring are already rather large, we have not pursued to derive bar pattern speeds and incorporate them into our analysis. 7. Conclusions From a larger Hα imaging survey we identified 22 galaxies that contain a nuclear ring. To identify their sizes and shapes, we fitted each ring with an ellipse based on the peak isophotal intensity across the radial range of the ring. The rings vary in size from 0.2 kpc to 1.7 kpc in major axis radius. We compare the ring morphologies to those of their host galaxies. In all but one case the ellipticity and PA of the rings approximately match that of -- 19 -- their respective disk, which corroborates the idea that the ring is in the same plane as the disk. The exception is NGC 7570, which shows a distinct and self-consistent difference in both the PA and eccentricity in the ring versus the disk. All but one of the rings had sufficient spatial resolution for us to identify individual H ii regions. For each H ii region, we computed the EW and converted differences between them into relative ages and age gradients using the Starburst99 evolutionary models. Although we adopted an instantaneous starburst model, we acknowledge that the rings may be more representative of a hybrid episodic scenario where star formation toggles between latent and active periods corresponding to the time it takes for gas build-up to reach critical density. Three rings, NGC 1343, NGC 1530, and NGC 4321, contain bipolar age gradients, where the ages increased from each of the contact points. Many of the rings in our sample exhibit a well-defined age distribution pattern, but not throughout the entire ring. This can be a result of the combination of bar-induced dynamics and gravitational instabilities that are occurring on an intermittent basis. We calculated the SFR in each ring from the integrated luminosity contributed by all of the H ii regions forming the ring, and compared those rates to the appearance of a gradient within each ring (or lack thereof). The large uncertainties associated with variable extinction across the rings and the large dispersion of SFR values for both cases yields no clear correlation between the SFR and the emergence (or lack thereof) of an age-dependent azimuthal distribution. We do see a connection between the location of the bar contact points and the youngest H ii regions in two-thirds of the galaxies in our sample. acknowledgements We thank Dr. Isaac Shlosman for inflow rate discussions and Dr. Torsten Boker for input into earlier stages of the research. We also thank the referee for the thorough review of this paper. JHK acknowledges support from the Leverhulme Trust in the form of a Leverhulme Research Fellowship. The WHT is operated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Cal- ifornia Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. -- 20 -- ǫRing P ARing RRing (◦) (4) 120 160 122 135 60 25 88 135 170 115 125 141 105 192 121 146 89 130 38 135 30 133 (′′) (5) 4.4 × 4.1 12.2 × 6.9 5.1 × 2.6 4.1 × 3.1 8.8 × 6.6 6.8 × 4.9 3.3 × 2.8 6.6 × 5.9 8.8 × 7.0 6.6 × 4.6 5.3 × 3.2 1.6 × 1.5 3.5 × 3.2 6.1 × 5.5 38.5 × 13.4 4.6 × 3.7 11 × 8.8 3.3 × 3.0 1.6 × 1.5 4.4 × 4.2 6.3 × 4.2 9.9 × 9.4 (3) 0.06 0.37 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.65 0.2 0.20 0.10 0.09 0.05 0.2 0.05 RRing (kpc) (6) 0.2 × 0.2 1.7 × 1.0 0.4 × 0.2 0.3 × 0.2 1.2 × 0.9 1.2 × 0.8 0.2 × 0.2 0.3 × 0.3 0.7 × 0.6 0.7 × 0.5 1.1 × 0.6 0.3 × 0.3 1.2 × 1.1 1.0 × 0.9 1.1 × 0.4 0.5 × 0.4 0.8 × 0.7 0.5 × 0.5 0.5 × 0.5 1.3 × 1.3 1.0 × 0.7 1.0 × 1.0 NGC (1) 278 473 613 1300 1343 1530 4303 4314 4321 5248 5728 5905 5945 5953 6503 6951 7217 IC1438 7469 7570 7716 7742 Morph Type (2) SAB(rs)b SAB(r)0/a SB(rs)bc (R)SB(s)bc SAB(s)b SB(rs)b SAB(rs)bc SB(rs)a SAB(s)bc (R)SB(rs)bc (R1)SAB(r)a SB(r)b SB(rs)ab SAa SA(s)cd SAB(rs)bc (R)SA(r)ab SAB(r)a SAB (rs)a SBa SAB(r)b SA(r)b P ADisk P Abar SFR (◦) (7) - 153 120 106 80 8 - - 30 110 - 135 105 169 123 170 95 - 135 30 35 - (◦) (8) no bar 164 120 102 82 122 10 135 153 137 33 25 10 no bar no bar 85 no bar 124 56 30 34 no bar ( M⊙ yr−1) (9) 0.5 2.2 2.2 0.2 6.8 3.8 1.4 0.1 - 4.2 4.0 2.6 4.4 9.9 1.5 1.4 0.6 1.3 - 1.4 3.2 4.3 Table 1: Morphological characteristics of the galaxies in the observed sample. Galaxies are listed in order of increasing RA (Col. 1); morphological type as stated in the RC3 (Col. 2); ellipticity of the nuclear ring as derived by using the IRAF ellipse task (Col. 3); PA of the ring major axis, calculated counterclockwise from North to East (ellipse; Col. 4); ring radius in arcseconds (Col. 5) and kpc (Col. 6); PA of the galactic disk from RC3 (a dash represents a circular ring with no defined PA; Col. 7), except for NGC 1530 (Regan et al. 1996) which is based on kinematical data; PA of the bar major axis, except for NGC 1530 (Regan et al. 1996) and NGC 7469 (Davies, Tacconi, & Genzel 2004) which are based on kinematical data (Col. 8); and the ring SFR (a dash represents lack of data necessary to calculate the SFR; Col. 9) is derived from the total ring luminosity using the Kennicutt (1998) Hα-SFR relation. -- 21 -- NGC (1) 473 613 1300 1343 1530 4303 4314 5248 5728 5905 5945 6951 IC1438 7570 7716 CP #1 H ii region #1 CP #2 H ii region #2 Rotation Diff PA #1 Diff PA#2 (2) 254 210 12 172 32 280 45 47 303 295 100 355 214 300 124 (3) 312 205 345 140 344 304 27 43 305 343 148 339 251 353 91 (4) 74 30 192 352 212 100 225 227 123 115 280 175 34 120 304 (5) 38 323 269 309 282 114 222 243 147 151 280 100 32 131 301 (6) ccw ccw cw ccw cw cw cw ccw cw cw ccw cw ccw cw ccw (7) 58 15 27 32 48 24 18 4 2 48 48 16 37 53 33 (8) 36 67 77 43 70 14 3 16 24 36 0 75 2 11 3 Table 2: Comparison of the location (i.e., PA) of the contact points (CPs) to that of the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere, as bisected from the bar. The PAs of each contact point, defined to occur 90◦ offset from the bar PA, are given in Col. 2 and 4; the location of the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere is given in Col. 3 and 5 with the ring rotational direction cited in Col 6, as observed in the B − I images; Col. 7 and 8 indicate the difference in location between the contact points and the respective H ii region. In most cases the separation is small, which is conistent with the notion that the youngest H ii region (in its respective hemisphere) should be near the location of the contact points. NGC (1) 278 473 613 1300 1343 1530 4303 4314 4321 5248 5728 5905 5945 5953 6503 6951 7217 IC1438 7570 7716 7742 Age Distrib (2) az.gradient az. gradient flat no pattern az. gradient az. gradient no pattern az. gradient n/a az. gradient az. gradient flat flat rad gradient no pattern az. gradient az. gradient az. gradient rad gradient no pattern no pattern -- 22 -- Vrot ( km s−1) Ref Period CP time H ii region #1 H ii region #2 (Myr) (Myr) (Myr) (Myr) (3) 63 127 115 135 131 185 97 161 170 152 180 150 150 200 90 160 248 204 150 150 116 (4) (a) IFU (b) (c) IFU IFU IFU IFU (d) IFU (e) (f) (g) IFU (h) (c) (i) (j) (g) (g) IFU (5) 35 103 23 17 39 50 9 30 32 40 47 15 62 40 94 24 25 19 67 51 96 (6) - 72 13 0.6 18 4 6 4 - 5 45 11 17 - - 24 - 11 66 18 - (7) - 89 13 16 15 48 8 2 - 5 40 14 25 - - 23 - 13 65 13 - (8) - 62 9 4 14 14 7 3 - 7 43 14 17 - - 19 - 11 57 17 - Table 3: Age distribution and H ii region times. Col. 2 cites the age distribution, which fell into 4 categories: azimuthal gradient, radial gradient across the ring, flat, no pattern. For those rings with host bars, the period of the ring (Col. 5) is computed based on the rotational velocity at the ring radius (Col. 3) and the ring major axis radius (see Table 1, Col. 5); literature references for the rotational velocites are in Col. 4: a) Knapen et al. (2004); b) Blackman (1981); c) Knapen, Laine, & Relano (1999); d) Knapen et al. (2000); e) Rubin (1980); f) Moiseev, Vald´es, & Chavushyang (2004); g) no reference found- assumed a rotational velocity value of 150 km s−1, which is the average of the measured values for the other rings (all rings in this sample have similar host galaxy morphologies and rotation curve characteristics associated with the ring radial location) ; h) Bottema (1989) for Hβline; i) Peterson et al. (1978); j) P. M. Treuthardt & R. J. Buta, private communication; 'IFU' refers to our WIYN IFU data (L. M. Mazzuca et al. 2006). Travel times from the bar major axis PA to the contact points (Col 6) and to the youngest H ii region in each hemisphere (Col. 7 and 8, when a bar exists. -- 23 -- A. Individual H ii Region Parameters for the Galaxies For each ring in the sample we present tables that contain each H ii region as identified by SExtractor (col. 1), integrated flux (col. 2), luminosity (col. 3), EW (col 4) and log(EW) (col. 5). Column 6 indicates if the I-band flux needed to be modified in order to compensate for unrealistic values (i.e., negative flux values or marginally positive flux values -- see Section 4.2.1). In the cases where the I-band flux generated from SExtractor was not modified, a value of '0' is recorded; otherwise a value of '1' is recorded. Since SExtractor detects all H ii regions in the supplied image, extraneous H ii regions as well as the nucleus were included in the identification process. These superfluous detections are not included in the tables, but are instead noted in the captions for completeness sake. -- 24 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (2) 3.38 0.98 0.56 1.74 4.98 0.52 0.7 6.20 0.51 0.86 0.66 0.98 3.36 2.62 1.12 0.87 0.54 0.72 0.90 1.02 3.54 (3) 5.63 1.63 0.93 2.91 8.30 0.86 1.17 10.3 0.85 1.44 1.10 1.63 5.61 4.36 1.87 1.45 0.91 1.20 1.51 1.71 5.90 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 258 229 84 485 536 81 143 3341 (A) (5) 2.41 2.36 1.92 2.69 2.73 1.91 2.15 3.52 0.56 2.16 2.11 2.15 2.56 2.81 2.45 2.06 1.72 2.12 2.35 2.20 3.21 4 146 128 142 365 650 284 114 53 133 222 157 1620 Flux Correction (6) 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Table 4: NGC 278 - 20 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 4, 6, and 11 comprise the nucleus; H ii regions # 15, 16, and 17 are extraneous to the ring. -- 25 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 28 29 30 32 33 (2) 0.33 4.01 1.42 3.34 1.88 0.62 0.35 0.37 1.03 1.15 0.42 0.22 1.32 0.11 1.13 0.60 0.32 1.60 2.08 0.83 1.55 0.17 0.32 0.10 0.22 0.19 0.26 (3) 3.49 42.6 15 35.5 20 6.57 3.73 3.93 10.9 12.3 4.44 2.37 14.1 1.20 12 6.37 3.37 17 22.1 8.85 16.5 1.83 3.36 1.05 2.32 2.02 2.79 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 216 9343 1643 1409 2660 608 222 262 942 1812 389 122 647 41 1722 647 200 2241 2622 1138 1261 70 192 25 120 78 107 (A) (5) 2.33 3.97 3.22 3.15 3.42 2.78 2.35 2.42 2.97 3.26 2.59 2.09 2.81 1.62 3.24 2.81 2.30 3.35 3.42 3.06 3.10 1.85 2.28 1.41 2.08 1.89 2.03 Flux Correction (6) 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 5: NGC 473 - 27 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 23 and 24 comprise the nucleus; H ii regions # 2, 3, 27, and 31 are extraneous to the ring. -- 26 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 (2) 26.3 13.3 3.87 2.26 8.49 1.00 2.00 0.84 0.86 11.4 5.89 (3) 96.4 48.9 14.2 8.28 31.1 3.66 7.33 3.08 3.14 41.8 21.6 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 179 88 189 374 26 130 221 77 368 148 87 (A) (5) 2.25 1.95 2.28 2.57 1.42 2.12 2.34 1.88 2.57 2.17 1.94 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 6: NGC 613 - 12 H ii regions detected. H ii regions # 2 and 11 are extraneous to the ring. H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 (2) 1.34 1.34 0.21 0.05 0.40 0.16 0.15 0.18 0.70 0.51 0.45 0.39 (3) 5.69 5.67 0.88 0.23 1.71 0.67 0.63 0.75 2.95 2.17 1.91 1.64 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 107 56 47 7 118 33 25 37 240 155 158 56 (A) (5) 2.03 1.75 1.67 0.85 2.07 1.52 1.39 1.57 2.38 2.19 2.20 1.74 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Table 7: NGC 1300 - 12 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 9 is the nucleus. -- 27 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (2) 8.24 10.2 4.73 2.14 3.88 1.36 1.44 18.9 0.36 0.65 1.37 3.95 2.55 4.61 3.22 4.12 0.72 4.84 3.77 1.52 (3) 85.8 106 49.2 22.3 40.4 14.2 15 196 3.79 6.73 14.3 41.1 26.5 48 33.6 42.9 7.53 50.4 39.3 15.8 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 5364 744 330 247 650 396 400 5845 33 80 401 737 968 373 1340 1339 117 2513 479 305 (A) (5) 3.73 2.87 2.52 2.39 2.81 2.60 2.60 3.77 1.52 1.91 2.60 2.87 2.99 2.57 3.13 3.13 2.07 3.40 2.68 2.48 Flux Correction (6) 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Table 8: NGC 1343 - 20 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 13 and 14 comprise the nucleus; H ii region # 15 is extraneous to the ring. -- 28 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 7 11 14 15 17 (2) 6.79 13.4 1.46 1.05 0.52 0.52 1.84 0.98 1.55 (3) 109 215 23.4 16.8 8.32 8.31 29.5 15.8 24.8 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 1895 630 243 232 66 854 274 1951 3123 (A) (5) 3.28 2.80 2.38 2.37 1.82 2.93 2.44 3.29 3.49 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Table 9: NGC 1530 - 9 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 16 comprise the nucleus; H ii regions # 5 and 6 are extraneous to the ring. H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (2) 25.7 17.8 1.33 6.82 1.35 9.61 1.14 (3) 71.1 49.2 3.67 18.9 3.74 26.6 3.14 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 99 112 367 624 74 1676 106 (A) (5) 2.00 2.05 2.57 2.80 1.87 3.22 2.03 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 10: NGC 4303 - 7 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 1 comprises the nucleus. -- 29 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 (2) 3.32 3.78 0.39 0.23 2.13 2.82 0.12 0.54 0.42 0.46 (3) 3.74 4.25 0.44 0.26 2.40 3.18 0.14 0.61 0.48 0.52 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 529 2607 111 148 375 1801 344 211 1088 1288 (A) (5) 2.72 3.42 2.05 2.17 2.57 3.26 2.54 2.32 3.04 3.11 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 11: NGC 4313 - 10 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 6 comprises the nucleus. -- 30 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (2) 27.8 4.08 1.23 0.92 1.82 6.18 2.88 1.06 3.76 1.87 4.93 2.03 7.44 14 0.57 1.86 1.51 0.88 1.82 (3) 171 25.2 7.58 5.68 11.2 38.1 17.8 6.53 23.2 11.5 30.4 12.5 45.9 86.1 3.52 11.5 9.33 5.40 11.2 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 1106 259 206 1277 6790 121 222 49 6378 2275 485 539 191 965 78 153 3125 1145 179 (A) (5) 3.04 2.41 2.31 3.11 3.83 2.08 2.35 1.69 3.80 3.36 2.69 2.73 2.28 2.98 1.89 2.19 3.49 3.06 2.25 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Table 12: NGC 5248 - 19 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 1 comprises the nucleus. -- 31 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 21 22 (2) 2.28 0.27 2.13 2.19 3.87 0.21 0.70 0.16 0.30 0.17 0.22 0.62 1.11 4.09 3.52 1.53 0.24 0.39 (3) 48.6 5.76 45.4 46.7 82.5 4.48 15 3.53 6.32 3.58 4.78 13.3 23.6 87.2 75 32.6 5.10 8.38 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 1164 163 7961 248 556 170 1516 109 479 111 226 1218 3084 211 1426 1310 182 455 (A) (5) 3.07 2.21 3.90 2.40 2.74 2.23 3.18 2.04 2.68 2.04 2.35 3.09 3.49 2.32 3.15 3.12 2.26 2.66 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 Table 13: NGC 5728 - 18 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 1 and 2 comprise the nucleus; H ii regions # 16 and 20 are extraneous to the ring. -- 32 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (2) 2.39 2.63 0.40 0.67 0.41 0.38 0.25 3.27 1.75 (3) 58.5 64.3 9.80 16.3 10 9.37 6.20 79.9 42.7 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 77 189 97 2870 177 154 199 87 132 (A) (5) 1.88 2.28 1.99 3.46 2.25 2.19 2.30 1.94 2.12 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Table 14: NGC 5905 - 9 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. No nuclear or extraneous H ii regions detected. H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 2 3 4 (2) 3.84 3.82 0.93 (3) 249 248 60.2 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 15 16 29 (A) (5) 1.17 1.21 1.46 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 Table 15: NGC 5945 - 3 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 1 comprises the nucleus. -- 33 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (2) 11.6 9.84 24.9 2.24 1.22 6.38 2.56 5.41 4.35 2.19 3.22 0.43 0.74 2.01 0.45 2.57 1.86 3.25 3.63 7.02 0.33 0.46 (3) 152 128 324 29.2 15.9 83.2 33.3 70.5 56.7 28.5 42 5.57 9.67 26.1 5.82 33.5 24.3 42.4 47.4 91.5 4.30 5.99 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 152 390 541 652 247 614 591 2162 784 94 1013 30 88 4 4 130 50 154 1374 866 23 48 (A) (5) 2.18 2.59 2.73 2.81 2.39 2.79 2.77 3.33 2.89 1.97 3.01 1.48 1.94 0.61 0.55 2.12 1.70 2.19 3.14 2.94 1.37 1.68 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Table 16: NGC 5953 - 22 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 1 comprises the nucleus. -- 34 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 (2) 38.6 7.12 1.08 2.28 1.55 1.90 3.43 2.08 4.07 0.94 10.7 2.60 2.64 1.13 0.55 0.59 1.00 10.5 14.8 12.3 4.66 0.87 2.64 1.32 9.70 1.22 0.95 5.72 2.87 2.32 6.78 2.18 3.92 11.8 33 (3) 17.2 3.17 0.48 1.01 0.69 0.84 1.53 0.93 1.81 0.42 4.76 1.16 1.18 0.50 0.25 0.26 0.45 4.66 6.59 5.46 2.08 0.39 1.18 0.59 4.32 0.54 0.42 2.55 1.28 1.03 3.02 0.97 1.75 5.26 14.7 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 3686 804 45 151 52 67 224 98 307 26 1715 214 120 40 12 13 31 796 1123 2072 304 22 190 70 1271 37 21 431 148 92 808 132 323 1774 6628 (A) (5) 3.57 2.91 1.65 2.18 1.71 1.83 2.35 1.99 2.49 1.42 3.23 2.33 2.08 1.60 1.08 1.11 1.49 2.90 3.05 3.32 2.48 1.34 2.28 1.85 3.10 1.57 1.32 2.63 2.17 1.96 2.91 2.12 2.51 3.25 3.82 Flux Correction (6) 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 17: NGC 6503 - 84 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 39, 44, and 45 comprise the nucleus; H ii regions # 1, 2, and 86 are extraneous to the ring. -- 35 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 38 40 41 42 43 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 (2) 5.41 5.55 9.64 7.17 2.88 9.87 1.36 1.30 3.55 1.85 1.19 3.29 3.95 2.51 2.97 2.92 10.3 6.08 7.01 1.16 2.40 2.72 20.8 0.75 1.17 8.01 0.62 1.49 37.2 1.54 2.34 1.57 1.49 1.69 2.83 1.65 0.36 (3) 2.41 2.47 4.29 3.19 1.28 4.39 0.61 0.58 1.58 0.82 0.53 1.47 1.76 1.12 1.32 1.30 4.57 2.71 3.12 0.51 1.07 1.21 9.27 0.34 0.52 3.57 0.28 0.66 16.6 0.69 1.04 0.70 0.66 0.75 1.26 0.74 0.16 Table 17: NGC 6503 - continued. EW log(EW) (A) (4) 584 570 1331 661 240 1363 51 49 299 66 40 278 337 191 129 172 1594 657 682 44 150 16 2839 19 47 1106 14 65 7731 51 110 71 49 60 174 75 10 (A) (5) 2.77 2.76 3.12 2.82 2.38 3.13 1.71 1.69 2.48 1.82 1.60 2.44 2.53 2.28 2.11 2.24 3.20 2.82 2.83 1.64 2.18 1.19 3.45 1.28 1.67 3.04 1.13 1.81 3.89 1.71 2.04 1.85 1.69 1.78 2.24 1.87 1.00 Flux Correction (6) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- 36 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 87 88 89 90 (2) 1.80 2.94 3.84 3.86 1.16 1.38 4.53 1.27 2.03 4.13 2.45 1.14 (3) 0.80 1.31 1.71 1.72 0.52 0.61 2.02 0.57 0.90 1.84 1.09 0.51 Table 17: NGC 6503 - continued. EW log(EW) (A) (4) 78 236 312 219 62 81 483 45 117 356 106 35 (A) (5) 1.89 2.37 2.49 2.34 1.79 1.91 2.68 1.65 2.07 2.55 2.03 1.55 Flux Correction (6) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- 37 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (2) 7.63 0.60 2.30 0.87 8.92 1.36 2.30 1.38 (3) 53 4.15 16 6.08 62 9.45 16 9.60 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 58 120 810 95 3034 154 103 37 (A) (5) 1.77 2.08 2.91 1.98 3.48 2.19 2.01 1.56 Flux Correction (6) 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Table 18: NGC 6951 - 8 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 1 comprises the nucleus. -- 38 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 2 3 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (2) 1.70 1.06 0.43 0.65 0.73 0.50 1.84 0.79 0.61 10.3 0.40 0.26 0.76 0.21 0.52 0.64 0.62 0.23 1.06 0.77 0.31 1.19 (3) 5.20 3.25 1.32 1.99 2.23 1.54 5.64 2.43 1.86 31.5 1.23 0.80 2.32 0.64 1.59 1.95 1.90 0.71 3.25 2.37 0.94 3.64 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 88 542 118 224 306 153 987 263 216 56 105 42 262 33 143 137 189 48 478 246 63 477 (A) (5) 1.94 2.73 2.07 2.35 2.49 2.18 2.99 2.42 2.33 1.74 2.02 1.62 2.42 1.52 2.16 2.14 2.28 1.68 2.68 2.39 1.80 2.68 Flux Correction (6) 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 19: NGC 7217 - 22 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 1 and 4 comprise the nucleus; H ii regions # 5 and 7 are extraneous to the ring. -- 39 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 (2) 0.49 1.11 0.24 0.65 0.91 0.31 2.21 3.38 1.30 0.95 0.39 (3) 6.77 15.2 3.27 8.96 12.4 4.30 30.2 46.2 17.8 13 5.31 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 56 1054 71 65 685 86 582 234 43 244 49 (A) (5) 1.75 3.02 1.85 1.81 2.84 1.94 2.77 2.37 1.63 2.39 1.69 Flux Correction (6) 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Table 20: IC 1438 - 11 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 7 and 8 comprise the nucleus. -- 40 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (2) 0.49 0.25 0.35 0.41 0.16 0.77 0.44 0.48 1.43 0.17 0.31 0.12 0.21 0.38 0.30 0.25 0.14 0.80 (3) 12 6.11 8.46 10 3.85 18.9 10.7 11.7 35 4.26 7.49 3.04 5.18 9.42 7.45 6.08 3.38 19.6 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 446 234 410 439 93 915 343 374 3371 73 203 74 199 302 146 217 92 1009 (A) (5) 2.65 2.37 2.61 2.64 1.97 2.96 2.54 2.57 3.53 1.86 2.31 1.87 2.30 2.48 2.17 2.34 1.96 3.00 Flux Correction (6) 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Table 21: NGC 7570 - 18 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii regions # 10, 11, 12, and 13 comprise the nucleus. -- 41 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 32 33 34 35 (2) 3.14 1.53 1.38 0.75 0.30 0.52 0.18 0.31 0.5 0.84 0.40 0.31 1.20 0.10 2.98 0.95 3.42 0.63 0.83 0.64 2.06 0.20 0.56 0.50 0.29 0.69 0.27 0.45 3.28 0.59 (3) 42.6 20.7 18.8 10.2 4.13 7.02 2.48 4.24 6.80 11.4 5.40 4.19 16.4 1.41 40.6 13 46.5 8.57 11.3 8.71 28 2.76 7.64 6.83 3.93 9.32 3.64 6.08 44.6 8.08 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 1516 684 436 1259 320 1643 304 526 1478 2556 643 694 4475 100 1840 2904 20204 316 102 2039 1135 413 1146 1523 519 1100 575 1323 23884 1756 (A) (5) 3.18 2.84 2.64 3.10 2.51 3.22 2.48 2.72 3.17 3.41 2.81 2.84 3.65 2.00 3.26 3.46 4.31 2.50 2.01 3.31 3.06 2.62 3.06 3.18 2.71 3.04 2.76 3.12 4.38 3.24 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 Table 22: NGC 7716 - 30 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 16 comprises the nucleus; H ii regions # 9, 27, 28, and 31 are extraneous to the ring. -- 42 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 (2) 1.70 6.64 6.59 3.61 1.08 1.84 0.88 12.4 0.61 1.84 0.81 2.28 0.99 5.07 1.45 0.70 0.39 3.09 1.68 5.59 1.05 2.55 2.51 1.63 0.27 2.83 1.14 0.94 1.17 2.76 0.42 0.58 2.00 0.54 (3) 10 39.2 38.9 21.3 6.37 10.9 5.19 73.2 3.59 10.9 4.80 13.5 5.82 29.9 8.54 4.15 2.30 18.2 9.90 32.9 6.21 15 14.8 9.59 1.59 16.7 6.75 5.54 6.88 16.3 2.47 3.45 11.8 3.19 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 254 352 484 524 284 496 236 2057 129 696 151 1003 347 674 507 191 55 464 575 3721 317 254 274 626 27 677 342 244 234 1300 84 122 811 116 (A) (5) 2.41 2.55 2.68 2.72 2.45 2.70 2.37 3.31 2.11 2.84 2.18 3.00 2.54 2.83 2.70 2.28 1.74 2.67 2.76 3.57 2.50 2.40 2.44 2.80 1.43 2.83 2.53 2.39 2.37 3.11 1.92 2.09 2.91 2.06 Flux Correction (6) 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 23: NGC 7742 - 38 H ii regions detected associated with the ring. H ii region # 18 comprises the nucleus. -- 43 -- H ii region Integrated Flux (10−13 erg s−1cm−2) Luminosity (1039 erg s−1) (1) 36 37 38 39 (2) 5.52 1.22 0.38 4.75 (3) 32.6 7.19 2.25 28 EW log(EW) (A) (4) 3043 390 68 2633 (A) (5) 3.48 2.59 1.83 3.42 Flux Correction (6) 1 1 1 1 Table 23: NGC 7742 continued. -- 44 -- REFERENCES Allard, E. L., Peletier, R. F., & Knapen, J. H. 2005, ApJ, 633, L25 Allard, E. L.,Knapen, J. H., Peletier, R. F., & Sarzi, M. 2006, submitted to MNRAS Athanassoula, E. 2000, Stars, Gas and Dust in Galaxies: Exploring the Links, 221, 243 Athanassoula, E. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 345 Benedict, G. F., et al. 1993, AJ, 105, 1369 Bertin, E., Arnouts, S. 1996, A&A, S117, 393 Blackman, C. P. 1981, MNRAS, 195, 451 Bottema, R. 1989, A&A, 221, 236 Buta, R. & Combes, F., 1996, Fund. of Cosmic Phys. 17, 95 Buta, R. & Crocker, D. A. 1993, AJ, 105, 1344 Combes, F., & Gerin, M. 1985, A&A, 150, 327 Combes, F., et al. 2004, A&A, 414, 857 Davies, R. I., Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R. 2004, ApJ, 602, 148 D´ıaz-Santos, T., Alonso-Herrero, A., Colina, L., Ryder, S. D., Knapen J. H. 2007,ApJ, 661, 149 Elmegreen, B. 1996, IAU Colloq. 157: Barred Galaxies, 91, 197 Elmegreen, B. G. 2002, Modes of Star Formation and the Origin of Field Populations, 285, 425 Elmegreen, B. 1997, RMxAC, 6, 165 Garc´ıa-Burillo, S., Combes, F., Schinnerer, E., Boone, F., & Hunt, L. K. 2005, A&A, 441, 1011 Genzel, R., Weitzel, L., Tacconi-Garman, L. E., Blietz, M., Cameron, M., Krabbe, A., Lutz, D., & Sternberg, A. 1995, ApJ, 444, 129 Helfer, T. T., Thornley, M. D., Regan, M. W., Wong, T., Sheth, K., Vogel, S. N., Blitz, L., & Bock, D. C.-J. 2003, ApJS, 145, 259 -- 45 -- Heller, C. H., & Shlosman, I. 1994, ApJ, 424, 84 Heller, C. H., & Shlosman, I. 1996, ApJ, 471, 143 Hummel, E., van der Hulst, J. M., & Keel, W. C. 1987, A&A, 172, 32 Jogee, S., Shlosman, I., Laine, S., Englmaier, P., Knapen, J. H., Scoville, N., & Wilson, C. D. 2002, ApJ, 575, 156 Jogee, S., Scoville, N., & Kenney, J. D. P. 2005, ApJ, 630, 837 Kenney, J. D. P., Wilson, C. D., Scoville, N. Z., Devereux, N. A., & Young, J. S. 1992, ApJ, 395, L79 Kenney, J. D. P., Carlstrom, J. E., & Young, J. S. 1993, ApJ, 418, 687 Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189 Knapen, J.H., Beckman, J. E., Heller, C. H., Shlosman, I., de Jong, R.S. 1995a, ApJ, 454, 623 Knapen, J. H., Beckman, J. E., Shlosman, I., Peletier, R. F., Heller, C. H., & de Jong, R. S. 1995b, ApJ, 443, L73 Knapen, J. H. 1999, The Evolution of Galaxies on Cosmological Timescales, 187, 72 Knapen, J. H., Laine, S., & Relano, M. 1999, Ap&SS, 269, 605 Knapen, J. H., Shlosman, I., Heller, C. H., Rand, R. J., Beckman, J. E., & Rozas, M. 2000, ApJ, 528, 219 Knapen, J. H., Whyte, L. F., de Blok, W. J. G., & van der Hulst, J. M. 2004, A&A, 423, 481 Knapen, J. H. 2005, A&A, 429, 141 Knapen,J.H., Mazzuca, L.M., Boker, T, Shlosman, I., Colina, L. Combes, F., Axon, D.J. 2006, A&A, 448, 489 Kormendy, J., Kennicutt, R. C. Jr. 2004 ARA&A, 42, 603 Kroupa, P. 2002, Modes of Star Formation and the Origin of Field Populations, 285, 86 Leitherer, C., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3 -- 46 -- Maciejewski, W., Teuben, P. J., Sparke, L. S., & Stone, J. M. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 502 Maoz, D., Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C., Sternberg, A., & Filippenko, A. V. 2001, AJ, 121, 3048 Martinet, L. 1995, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 15, 341 Moiseev, A. V., Vald´es, J. R., & Chavushyan, V. H. 2004, A&A, 421, 433 Oke,J., 1990 AJ 99,5 Osmer, P. S., Smith, M. G., & Weedman, D. W. 1974, ApJ, 192, 279 Peterson, C. J., Roberts, M. S., Rubin, V. C., & Ford, W. K. 1978, ApJ, 226, 770 Phillips, A. C. 1996, ASP Conf. Ser. 91: IAU Colloq. 157: Barred Galaxies, 91, 44 Piner, B., Stone, J., Teuben, P. 1995, ApJ,449, 508P Pogge, R. W. 1989, ApJ, 345, 730 Regan, M. W., Teuben, P. J., Vogel, S. N., & van der Hulst, T. 1996, AJ, 112, 2549 Regan, M. W., & Teuben, P. J. 2004, ApJ, 600, 595 Regan, M. W., Vogel, S. N., & Teuben, P. J. 1997, ApJ, 482, L143 Regan, M. W., Teuben, P. 2003 APJ, 582, 723 Rubin, V. C. 1980, ApJ, 238, 808 Rubin, V. C., Kenney, J. D. P., & Young, J. S. 1997, AJ, 113, 1250 Ryder, S. D., Knapen, J. H., & Takamiya, M. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 663 Sakamoto, K., Okumura, S. K., Ishizuki, S., & Scoville, N. Z. 1999, ApJ, 525, 691 Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 Sarzi, M., Allard, E.L., Knapen, J. H., Mazzuca, L. M., MNRAS in press Schwarz, M. P. 1981, ApJ, 247, 77 Shlosman, I., Begelman, M. C., & Frank, J. 1990, Nature, 345, 679 Sheth, K., Regan, M. W., Vogel, S. N., & Teuben, P. J. 2000, ApJ, 532, 221 Smith, D. A., Herter, T., Haynes, M. P., & Neff, S. G. 1999, ApJ, 510, 669 -- 47 -- Storchi-Bergmann, T., Wilson, A. S., & Baldwin, J. A. 1996, ApJ, 460, 252 Tully, R. B. 1988 British Astronomical Association Journal, 98, 6 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 48 -- Fig. 1. -- panels a. - l.: Ellipse fits for the nuclear rings in the sample galaxies produced by the IRAF task ellipse, overlaid on the Hα images. The major axis lengths were optimized based on the maximum intensity along a given contour as computed using ellipse (see Section 3). -- 49 -- Fig. 1. -- continued: panels m. - v. -- 50 -- Fig. 2. -- (a) PA of the disk versus the ring major axis for those rings whose ellipticity is greater than or equal to 0.1. (b) Ellipticity comparison between the ring and the galactic disk. Both plots show a linear relationship between the ring and host galaxy PA and ellipticity, and indicate that the rings are in the same plane as the disk and are nearly circular. -- 51 -- Fig. 3. -- panels a. - l.: Results from SExtractor. Each H ii region identified is fitted using a Kron ellipse, which calculates the total magnitude of the extended H ii region. In the cases where the Hα boundaries are merged from one or more sources, the program deblends the regions and indicates these fittings with a dashed ellipse. SExtractor could not identify any H ii regions for NGC 7469 due to poor spatial resolution. -- 52 -- -- 53 -- Fig. 4. -- Change in ring morphology for NGC 1343 based on variation of the background box size and detection threshold value. Top row shows the resolved H ii regions based on fixing the threshold at 2σ and varying the box size - a) box size = 4x4 pixels with 31 H ii region detections; b) box size = 12x12 pixels with 20 detections. The center image is the reference image: box size = 8x8 pixels with 25 detections. Bottom row shows the images based on fixing the box size at 8x8 pixels and varying the threshold value - c) threshold = 1.33σ with 30 detections; d) threshold = 3σ with 19 detections. The optimal solution was derived iteratively and based on comparison of the general size, shape, and quantity of the regions that could be easily detected by eye in the Halpha image. The grayscale is not representative of the ages of the regions, but rather the order in which SExtractor identified the regions. -- 54 -- Fig. 5. -- Age distribution -- a. through h. The left panels plot the PA of each H ii region vs. their EW. Solid diamonds represent those EWs whose I-band fluxes were not affected by the background 3σ noise; open diamonds indicate EW where I-band fluxes needed to be increased to compensate for the dominant background noise; open diamonds with crosses show those H ii regions that would not have needed their flux modified if using a 2σ constraint. The right panels picturize the rings with their identified H ii regions. Age decreases as the shade of color changes from light to dark. Arrows are drawn to indicate the PA of the bar major axis, as well as the rotational direction of flow in the ring (when a bar exists). The ring major axis is indicated by two dashed lines. All rings have been rotated to a typical North-East configuration. See Section 6.1 for details. NGC 4321 is based on Hβ analysis from Allard et al. (2006). -- 55 -- -- 56 -- -- 57 -- Fig. 6. -- Hα EW vs. (1999; Starburst99 curves) for an instantaneous and a continuous burst of star formation with a Salpeter IMF between Mlow = 1 M⊙ and Mup = 100 M⊙. A solar metallicity of Z = 0.02 is used. time following Leitherer et al. -- 58 -- time following Leitherer et al. Fig. 7. -- Hα EW vs. (1999; Starburst99 curves) for an instantaneous burst of star formation (left panel) and continuous burst (right panel) for varying IMF slopes, upper limit masses, and metalicities. The thick solid line represents the model prediction we adopted for IMF between Mlow = 1 M⊙ and Mup = 100 M⊙, IMF slope= 2.35, and Z = 0.02. Long dashed lines represent a slope of 3.3 and Mup = 100 M⊙ for Z=0.04 and Z=0.008. Short dashed lines represent a slope of 2.35 and Mup = 30 M⊙ for Z=0.04 and Z=0.008. -- 59 -- Fig. 8. -- panels a. through l.: B -I images with indicators of the bar PA and contact point (CP) PA. The CP PA is defined as a 90◦ offset from the bar PA. In those images with a bar, the blue line (the longer line if viewing in black and white) extends to approximately half the bar major axis size (and traverses the entire FOV in some cases where the ring was magnified such that the bar cannot be fully seen); the the green line (shorter line drawn to the approximate ring diameter) represents the CP PAs, which are assumed to be 90 ◦ offsets of the bar PA. -- 60 -- -- 61 -- Fig. 9. -- Integrated SFR of the rings. The SFR is compared to the presence (left panel) or absence (right panel) of an age gradient. The mean SFR values are 2.2±0.7 M⊙ yr−1 (uncertainty is standard error) for the galaxies with and 3.6±1.1 M⊙ yr−1 for those without gradients. Fig. 10. -- Histogram showing the distribution of angular offsets between the bar major axis PA and the locations of the youngest Hii region in each hemisphere, which is bisected by the bar. A Gaussian fit to the distribution is overlaid, and shows a peak at an offset of 90◦, which is consistent with the location of the contact points. See Table 2 for more details.
0708.2576	2	0708	2007-08-24T02:09:54	The Nature of the Hard-X-Ray Emitting Symbiotic Star RT Cru	[ "astro-ph" ]	We describe Chandra High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer observations of RT Cru, the first of a new sub-class of symbiotic stars that appear to contain white dwarfs (WDs) capable of producing hard X-ray emission out to greater than 50 keV. The production of such hard X-ray emission from the objects in this sub-class (which also includes CD -57 3057, T CrB, and CH Cyg) challenges our understanding of accreting WDs. We find that the 0.3 -- 8.0 keV X-ray spectrum of RT Cru emanates from an isobaric cooling flow, as in the optically thin accretion-disk boundary layers of some dwarf novae. The parameters of the spectral fit confirm that the compact accretor is a WD, and they are consistent with the WD being massive. We detect rapid, stochastic variability from the X-ray emission below 4 keV. The combination of flickering variability and a cooling-flow spectrum indicates that RT Cru is likely powered by accretion through a disk. Whereas the cataclysmic variable stars with the hardest X-ray emission are typically magnetic accretors with X-ray flux modulated at the WD spin period, we find that the X-ray emission from RT Cru is not pulsed. RT Cru therefore shows no evidence for magnetically channeled accretion, consistent with our interpretation that the Chandra spectrum arises from an accretion-disk boundary layer.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version October 27, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 7 0 0 2 g u A 4 2 ] h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 6 7 5 2 . 8 0 7 0 : v i X r a THE NATURE OF THE HARD-X-RAY EMITTING SYMBIOTIC STAR RT CRU Instituto de Astronomia, Geof´ısica e Ciencias Atmosfericas, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua do Matao 1226, Cid. Universitaria, Sao G. J. M. Luna Paulo, Brazil 05508-900 and J. L. Sokoloski Columbia Astrophysics Lab. 550 W120th St., 1027 Pupin Hall, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA Draft version October 27, 2018 ABSTRACT We describe Chandra High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer observations of RT Cru, the first of a new sub-class of symbiotic stars that appear to contain white dwarfs (WDs) capable of producing hard X-ray emission out to greater than 50 keV. The production of such hard X-ray emission from the objects in this sub-class (which also includes CD −57 3057, T CrB, and CH Cyg) challenges our understanding of accreting WDs. We find that the 0.3 -- 8.0 keV X-ray spectrum of RT Cru emanates from an isobaric cooling flow, as in the optically thin accretion-disk boundary layers of some dwarf novae. The parameters of the spectral fit confirm that the compact accretor is a WD, and they are consistent with the WD being massive. We detect rapid, stochastic variability from the X-ray emission below 4 keV. The combination of flickering variability and a cooling-flow spectrum indicates that RT Cru is likely powered by accretion through a disk. Whereas the cataclysmic variable stars with the hardest X-ray emission are typically magnetic accretors with X-ray flux modulated at the WD spin period, we find that the X-ray emission from RT Cru is not pulsed. RT Cru therefore shows no evidence for magnetically channeled accretion, consistent with our interpretation that the Chandra spectrum arises from an accretion-disk boundary layer. Subject headings: binary stars: general -- white dwarf: accretion -- X-rays 1. INTRODUCTION Symbiotic stars are interacting binaries in which a hot, compact star accretes from the wind of a red-giant com- panion. Although a few symbiotics contain neutron- star accretors (e.g.,GX 1+4, 4U 1700+24, 4U 1954+31, IGR J16194-2810; Davidsen et al. 1977; Masetti et al. 2002; Galloway et al. 2002; Masetti et al. 2007a,b), the accreting compact object is usually a white dwarf (WD). Typical binary separations are on the order of AU, with orbital periods on the order of a few hundred days to a few decades (Kenyon 1986; Belczy´nski et al. 2000). Sym- biotics can thus be thought of as very large cousins of cataclysmic variables (CVs). The accretion rate onto the WD appears to be high enough in most symbiotic sys- tems that accreted material is burned quasi-steadily in a shell on the WD surface, producing a high UV luminos- ity (Sokoloski et al. 2001; Orio et al. 2007). Although accretion disks are likely to exist around the WDs in some symbiotics (Livio 1997; Sokoloski & Kenyon 2003), there is little direct evidence for these disks. Finally, the red-giant wind produces a dense nebula that surrounds the system. Most symbiotic stars with detectable X-ray emis- sion display soft, or supersoft, thermal X-ray spectra. As in the supersoft X-ray sources, the lowest-energy X-rays could emanate directly from material burning quasi-steadily on the WD surface (Jordan et al. 1994; Orio et al. 2007). Based on a survey of symbiotics with ROSAT , Muerset et al. (1997) proposed that symbiotics be classified according to the hardness of their X-ray Electronic address: [email protected] Electronic address: [email protected] spectra. They labeled sources with supersoft spectra α-types, sources with the slightly harder spectra likely to arise from collision of the red-giant and white-dwarf winds β-types, and systems with the hardest spectra that might be indicative of neutron stars γ-types. Al- though more recent observations using the broader X-ray coverage and greater sensitivity of Chandra and XMM- N ewton have shown that some symbiotics do not fit into the simple α/β/γ classification scheme (e.g., Z And and o Ceti; Sokoloski et al. 2006; Karovska et al. 2005), most still appear to produce primarily soft X-rays (E < 3 keV). With the advent of the sensitive hard X-ray detec- tors on the Swif t and INTEGRAL satellites, a new pic- ture has emerged. Some symbiotic stars can produce X-ray emission out to greater than 50 keV. Such hard X- ray emission has so far been detected from 4 symbiotics thought to harbor WDs -- RT Cru (Chernyakova et al. 2005; Bird et al. 2007), T CrB (Tueller et al. 2005; Luna et al. 2007), CH Cyg (Mukai et al. 2007) and CD - 57 3057 (Masetti et al. 2006; Bird et al. 2007). Although the origin of this hard X-ray emission is not known, there are some underlying similarities between these hard X- ray emitting symbiotics. Unlike most other symbiotic stars, they display a high incidence of optical flickering. They also tend to have low optical line strengths, indi- cating that they are often only "weakly" symbiotic. Both the visibility of the optical flickering (which in most sym- biotics is overwhelmed by reprocessed shell-burning emis- sion; Sokoloski 2003) and the weakness or low-ionization- state of the optical lines suggest that quasi-steady shell burning is not taking place in these objects, either be- cause: 1) the WD is more massive, or 2) the accre- 2 Luna & Sokoloski tion rate is lower than in other symbiotics. Hard X- ray emission might therefore be a proxy for high WD mass. In fact, at least one of the hard-X-ray symbiotics, T CrB, is a recurrent nova and contains a high-mass WD (Hachisu & Kato 2001). Finally, jet production appears to be more common in flickering symbiotics, and one of the 4 hard X-ray symbiotics -- CH Cyg -- regularly produces jets (Taylor et al. 1986; Karovska et al. 1998; Crocker et al. 2001, 2002). Other WDs in hard X-ray symbiotics might thus also harbor jets. Cieslinski et al. (1994) classified RT Cru as a symbi- otic star based on its optical spectrum. They noted that the lack of strong high-ionization emission lines and the very weak forbidden emission lines make the optical spectrum similar to that of T CrB. They detected opti- cal flickering in the U band with a time scale of a few tens of minutes. Except for GX 1+4 (Jablonski et al. 1997; Chakrabarty & Roche 1997), none of the neutron- star containing symbiotic stars produce optical flickering (e.g. Sokoloski et al. 2001), which is common in CVs, or show Balmer or He II emission lines (Masetti et al. 2007b). The presence of optical flickering and Balmer and He II emission lines from RT Cru (Cieslinski et al. 1994) suggests that it therefore contains an accreting WD rather than a neutron star. Reddening estimates from optical spectra and infrared magnitudes (coupled with the assumption that the radius of the M5 III red giant is about 0.5 AU; van Belle et al. 1999) suggest that RT Cru is between 1.5 and 2 kpc away (J. Miko lajewska, private communication). In 2003 and 2004, the IBIS instrument on board IN- TEGRAL detected hard X-ray emission extending out to ∼100 keV from the source IGR J12349-6434, which Chernyakova et al. (2005) found to have a 20-60 keV flux density of ∼3 mCrab. Masetti et al. (2005) suggested an association between IGR J12349-6434 and RT Cru, which observations with the Swif t satellite later con- firmed (Tueller et al. 2005). The long-term optical light curve from the AAVSO indicates that at the time of the INTEGRAL observations, RT Cru was in an optical bright state; it brightened from 13.5 to 11.5 mag some- time between 1998 and 2000. Between 2000 and 2005, the optical brightness slowly decreased to approximately 12.1 mag. The short (4.7 ks) Swift observation of 2005 August showed that between 2003 and 2005, the hard X-ray flux also decreased. In this paper, we describe Chandra High Energy Transmission Grating (HETG) observations of RT Cru, the first member of a new class of hard X-ray emitting symbiotic WDs. We detail the observations and data re- duction in §2 and the results from spectral and timing analyses in §3. In §4, we discuss our interpretation of the observations, which confirm that the accreting compact object in RT Cru is a WD and provide some of the most direct evidence to date for an accretion disk around a wind-fed WD in a symbiotic system. In this section, we also discuss the implications of a system that can accel- erate particles to relativistic speeds and produce X-ray emission out to greater than 50 keV being powered by an accreting WD. We summarize our conclusions in §5. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION vation of RT Cru using the HETG (Canizares et al. 2005) and the ACIS-S detector (ObsId 7186, start time 10:21:12 UT). We requested the DDT observation to attempt to catch RT Cru in the optical bright state that appeared to be associated with hard X-ray emission. We used the HETG instrument because the Swift XRT observation of 2005 August hinted at several possible emission-line complexes. The data were collected in Timed Exposure mode, in which the CCD chips were read out every 2.54 s. The data were telemetered back to earth in Faint mode, which conveys photon arrival times, event amplitudes, and additional information for evaluating the validity of each event. We reduced the data according to stan- dard procedures using the software package CIAO 3.31. We extracted a spectrum from the undispersed light (the zeroth-order spot, which fell on the S3, back-illuminated chip) using a circular extraction region with a radius of 6′′ centered on the source coordinates: α = 12h 34m 43.74s and δ = −64◦ 33′56.0′′. To obtain the background for the zeroth-order light, we extracted photons from a source- free circular region on the same CCD. We grouped the spectrum, which is shown in Fig. 1, to have at least 50 counts per bin. The average zeroth-order source count rate was 0.11 c s−1. For the dispersed light from both of the HETG sets of gratings -- the Medium Energy Grating (MEG) and the High Energy Grating (HEG) -- we extracted spectra from each of the m = ±1, ±2, and ±3 orders individually (us- ing the CIAO software tool dmtype2split). To obtain the background for the dispersed light, we extracted counts from rectangular regions on either side of the spectral image. The count rate in the HEG and MEG m ± 1 orders was 0.042 c s−1 and 0.034 c s−1, respectively. Al- though the dispersed spectral orders contained too few counts to produce a high signal-to-noise-ratio spectrum of lines spanning the full energy range of the instrument, the combined m = ±1 spectrum (grouped at twice the full width at half maximum of 0.012A) provided good- quality data in the region around the Fe Kα emission-line complex. We therefore used the the zeroth-order spec- trum for continuum fitting and the dispersed (m = ±1) spectra primarily for analysis of the Fe lines. The HEG and MEG m = ±2 and ±3 spectra helped confirm the Fe line identifications. For spectral fitting of both the zeroth and higher order photons, we used the standard software packages Xspec (Arnaud 1996) v12.3.0 and ISIS (Houck 2002). The background contributed less than 1% of the total extracted dispersed and undispersed light. We generated light curves in the energy bands 0.3 -- 4.0 keV and 4.0 -- 8.0 keV by extracting counts (with CIAO) from a region containing the zeroth-order spot and the m = ±1 dispersed orders of both the HEG and MEG. Since we estimated there to be only ∼70 back- ground counts in this extraction region during the course of the observation (compared to more than 9000 source counts), we did not background-subtract the light curves. At high count rates, two or more photons can arrive close enough together in time that they appear to be a single event. This "pileup" phenomenon can cause a spectrum to become distorted and the count rate to be reduced. To confirm that the zeroth order spectrum was On 2005 October 19, the Chandra X-ray Observatory performed a 50.1 ks Director's Discretionary Time obser- 1 Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations (CIAO), http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/. The Hard-X-Ray Symbiotic RT Cru 3 not affected by pileup, we divided the number of counts at the peak of the point spread function of the undis- persed light by the number of 2.54-s frames in the obser- vation to obtain an upper limit on the number of counts per pixel per frame. The resulting 0.08 counts per pixel per frame is well below the 1 count per pixel per frame where pileup can become important (Harris et al. 2004). Moreover, the average count rate in the zeroth order was significantly less than one count per frame time, indicat- ing that the light curve was not significantly distorted by the saturation that can occur at higher count rates (i.e., higher pileup fractions). The pileup fraction in the higher-order spectrum was negligible. 3. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 3.1. Spectral Analysis To model the X-ray spectrum, we first consider simple, single-component continuum models. We fitted these models to the binned 0.3 -- 8.0 keV zeroth-order spec- trum (above 8.0 keV, the noise rises and the quantum efficiency drops sharply). Absorbed single-component emission models such as a thermal plasma, powerlaw, or blackbody (plus Gaussian lines) do not produce accept- able fits. Even if we include complex absorption, such as an absorber that only partially covers the source, a pow- erlaw distribution of absorbers (as seen in some magnetic CVs; e.g., Done & Magdziarz 1998), or a"warm" ionized absorber, single-component emission models still do not produce acceptable fits. Including an additional broad-band emission compo- nent improves the fitting results. The spectrum is for- mally well fitted with a highly absorbed, optically thin thermal plasma (Mekal model in Xspec), plus a moder- ately absorbed non-thermal powerlaw component. Since there is some degeneracy between the amount of absorp- tion and the powerlaw index, we determine the powerlaw index by fixing the plasma temperature, T , and fitting the spectrum above 4 keV, where absorption is relatively unimportant. The resulting photon index is Γ = 1.051.29 0.78, where Γ is given by dFN /dE = K(E/E0)−Γ, dFN /dE is the photon flux density, E0 is 1 keV, K is the nor- malization constant, and the superscripts and subscripts are 90% confidence upper and lower limits, respectively. The photon index is not sensitive to the value to which we fix T . We determined the remaining model param- eters by fixing Γ to 1.1 and letting the other parame- ters vary. The thermal plasma has kT = 8.612.4 6.1 keV and an absorbing column nH = 9.312.5 7.2 × 1023 cm−2. The powerlaw component has an absorbing column of 6.3 × 1022 cm−2 and a normalization K = nH = 7.38.7 0.98 × 10−3 photons cm−2 s−1 keV−1. To obtain an 1.22.9 acceptable fit to the line emission, the model required abundances of about 0.3 times solar (using the abun- dances of Anders & Grevesse 1989). Because of the large column density absorbing the thermal emission in this model, the powerlaw component dominates below ap- proximately 4 keV, and the thermal emission dominates above 4 keV. We also obtained a formally acceptable fit with a highly absorbed powerlaw and a moderately absorbed thermal plasma. In that case, the thermal plasma dominated the low-energy portion of the spec- trum, and the powerlaw dominated the high-energy part of the spectrum. Finally, we consider the isobaric cooling-flow model that has worked well for both magnetic and non-magnetic CVs. In this model (Mkcflow; Mushotzky & Szymkowiak 1988), gas is assumed to radiatively cool from a high post-shock temperature under conditions of constant pressure. Such an isobaric cooling flow has a differen- tial emission-measure distribution that is a flat function of temperature. The gas is also assumed to be optically thin. This cooling flow model provides a good fit to the data. We find that the initial post-shock temperature is quite high. Although our 0.3 -- 8.0 keV spectrum does not allow a high-confidence determination of this parameter, the formal 90% confidence lower limit for the initial tem- perature is kTmax = 55 keV. The minimum cooling-flow temperature is consistent with the smallest value allowed by the Xspec Mkcflow model (kTmin = 80.8 eV), indicat- ing that the gas does indeed remain optically thin as it cools. Allowing the differential emission measure to have a powerlaw distribution (with the Cemkl model in Xspec) did not improve the fit. As with the two-component con- tinuum model, the cooling-flow model requires significant absorption. The abundances may also be sub-solar (0.3 times solar, using the abundances of Anders & Grevesse 1989). The best absorption model consists of both a pho- toelectric absorber that fully covers the source and an- other that only partially covers it. Table 1 lists the best- fit parameters for this model, which, as we discuss in §4, we believe provides the best description of the Chandra spectrum of RT Cru. In the first-order spectrum, we detect the iron-line complex spanning roughly 6.4 -- 7.0 keV. Fig. 2 shows the region around the iron-line complex in the combined MEG and HEG first-order (m = ±1) spectrum. Because of the large absorption and the resulting low count rate at low energies, we are not sensitive to lines such as OVIII (∼ 19 A) and Ne X (∼ 12 A) that have been seen in HETG observations of some other accreting WDs (e.g., Pandel et al. 2005; Mukai et al. 2003). For the Fe lines, we use a simple powerlaw to establish a continuum level and three Gaussian profiles to fit the Fe Kα, H-like Fe, and He-like Fe lines, respectively. To avoid the possible introduction of errors from misalignment of the HEG and MEG spectra, we use only the combined HEG first-order (m = ±1) spectrum for computation of the equivalent widths (EWs). Table 2 lists the line-center energies and EWs. Although we do not have enough counts to use the recombination, intercombination, and forbidden compo- nents of the H- or He-like Fe lines as density diagnostics, the observed line strengths and EWs confirm that the source is surrounded by a large amount of neutral mate- rial and that the abundances might be slightly sub-solar. The Fe Kα EW of 108 eV is consistent with that ex- pected for a source inside a cloud of cold material with the NH of ∼ 1023 cm−2 (Inoue 1985), as we found from the continuum fitting. 3.2. Timing Analysis Examining time series binned at 508.208 s and 4065.664 s (i.e., 200 and 1600 times the frame time, re- spectively), we detected significant aperiodic, flickering- type variations on time scales of minutes to hours in the 0.3 -- 4.0 keV emission. Figure 3 shows the 508-s binned time series (light curves) in the energy ranges 0.3 -- 4.0 keV and 4.0 -- 8.0 keV. The fractional amplitude of the stochas- 4 Luna & Sokoloski tic variations appears to be largest in the 0.3 -- 4.0 keV energy range. In the 508-s binned 0.3 -- 4.0 keV time se- ries, the ratio of measured fractional rms variation, s, to that expected from Poisson fluctuations alone, sexp, is 1.96 (s = 36.6% and sexp = 18.7%). We detect the 0.3 -- 4.0 keV variability with even greater statistical signifi- cance in the 4065-s binned time series; the ratio s/sexp in this case is 3.35 (s = 22.1% and sexp = 6.6%). In the 4.0 -- 8.0 keV energy range, the 508-s binned time series has s/sexp = 1.36 (where s = 16.6% and sexp = 12.2%), and the 4065-s binned time series has s/sexp = 1.42 (s = 6.1% and sexp = 4.3%). We do not detect any periodic flux modulations. We are theoretically sensitive to an oscillation with fractional amplitude: graphs that follow). Comparing this luminosity with that expected from accretion, (1/2)(GM M /R) & LX , the ra- dius of the accreting compact object is: R . 3.2 × 108 cm(cid:18) M 1.3M⊙(cid:19) M 1.8 × 10−9M⊙ yr−1! , (3) where R and M are the radius and mass of the accre- tor, respectively, and M is the rate of accretion through the boundary layer. The radius is that of a WD. The Chandra X-ray spectrum therefore confirms that the compact object is a WD. To determine whether the Chandra-band X-ray emis- sion is indeed from an accretion-disk boundary layer, we consider the rapid variability. Rapid flickering typically emanates from an accretion region close to a compact ob- ject. Our detection of flickering therefore suggests that the X-ray emission detected from RT Cru by Chandra is powered by accretion. This accretion could proceed via a wind-fed accretion disk, magnetic accretion columns, or Bondi-Hoyle type direct-impact of the accreting material onto the WD. While the two-component (thermal plasma plus powerlaw) model provides a formally acceptable fit to the data, it is difficult to construct an interpretation of this model that is consistent with the rapid flicker- ing from accretion onto a WD. The isobaric cooling-flow spectral model, on the other hand, 1) provides a good fit to the data, 2) has been successfully applied to both the boundary layer emission from non-magnetic CVs (e.g., Mukai et al. 2003; Pandel et al. 2005) and the accretion columns of magnetic CVs (e.g., Cropper et al. 1998), and 3) provides a natural context for the flickering from ac- cretion. Most CVs with X-ray emission as hard as that which INTEGRAL and Swif t/BAT have detected from RT Cru have magnetic fields strong enough to channel the accretion flow into accretion columns (B ∼ 105 -- 106 G, where B is the magnetic field strength at the WD surface). Of the 8 CVs detected at energies greater than ∼ 50 keV with Swif t/BAT, all but SS Cyg are likely magnetic accretors (Barlow et al. 2006). In these systems, the hard X-rays come from hot gas behind the stand-off shock in the accretion column. Magnetic CVs typically have X-ray oscillations with pulsation ampli- tudes of tens of percent at the WD spin period, which is usually less than an hour (Warner 1995). Since typi- cal symbiotic-star accretion rates are higher than typical CV accretion rates, if the WD in RT Cru was strongly magnetic and in spin equilibrium, the spin period would probably be either comparable to or faster than those in CVs. Given our sensitivity to oscillations with peri- ods less than an hour, we therefore should have detected a spin modulation if RT Cru was magnetic. In fact, the power spectrum has no statistically significant peaks. We conclude that RT Cru is probably not a magnetic accre- tor. We thus favor the picture in which the X-ray emis- sion from RT Cru detected by Chandra is from a cooling flow in an accretion-disk boundary layer. 4.2. Implications The parameters of the cooling-flow fit to the boundary- layer emission provide the accretion rate as well as infor- mation about the WD. From the normalization param- A ≈ 2 (Ctotα)−1/2(cid:18)ln(cid:20) 9, 400(cid:19)−1/2 = 0.08(cid:18) Ctot 1 − δ 1 − (1 − ǫ)1/nf req(cid:21)(cid:19)1/2 0.77(cid:17)−1/2 (cid:16) α , (1) (2) where Ctot is the total number of counts in the observa- tion (ignoring the small number of background counts, which have a negligible effect), δ and ǫ are small num- bers related to the chance that a noise power in the power spectrum will exceed the detection threshold (both taken to be 0.05), nf req is the number of frequencies searched (nf req = 1644), and α has an average value of 0.77 and depends upon the location of the signal frequency in the frequency bin (see, e.g., van der Klis 1989; Sokoloski 1999). We are therefore sensitive to oscillations with fractional amplitudes of ∼ 8% in regions of the power spectrum dominated by white noise, which in this case consisted of frequencies greater than ∼ 1.4 mHz. In this analysis, we binned the time series in 15-s bins (i.e., 6 times the frame time). We were therefore sensitive to os- cillations with periods as short as 30 s, and most sensitive to oscillations with periods between 30 s and 12 m. Consistent with the presence of flickering in the light curves, the power spectrum rises at frequencies below 1.4 mHz. At these low frequencies, the power spectrum has a powerlaw index (i.e., slope on a log-log plot) of about −1. This "1/f -noise" at low frequencies reduces our sen- sitivity to oscillatory signals with periods greater than approximately 12 m. Since we expect the minimum os- cillation amplitude to which we are sensitive to increase roughly as the square root of the rising average broad- band power as we go to lower frequencies (i.e., longer periods), the oscillation amplitude required for detection increases gradually from &8% to &15% as we move from periods of 12 m to 1 hr. Taking into account the underly- ing broadband power, as well as the number of frequency bins searched, we did not detect any statistically signifi- cant oscillations in any portion of the power spectrum. 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. Interpretation of the Chandra Observations To estimate the radius of the accreting compact object, we take the unabsorbed 0.3 -- 8.0 keV X-ray luminosity, LX, to be either approximately equal to, or a rough lower limit to, the emission from an accretion-disk boundary layer (we justify the assumption that the Chandra X- ray emission emanates from a boundary layer in the para- The Hard-X-Ray Symbiotic RT Cru 5 eter of the cooling-flow model, the accretion rate onto M = 1.8 × 10−9 M⊙ yr−1 (d/2 kpc)2 (see Ta- the WD is ble 1). Since quasi-steady nuclear burning is frequently present on the WD surface, symbiotic stars should have accretion rates that are on average higher than those in CVs. The accretion rate we have found for RT Cru is consistent with this picture. It is also, however, just low enough that we expect the boundary layer to remain op- tically thin; Narayan & Popham (1993) find that for a 1 M⊙ WD, the boundary layer remains optically thin for accretion rates below 3 × 10−9 M⊙ yr−1. The parameters of the cooling-flow fit also indicate that the WD radius is small, suggesting that the WD could be quite massive. Taken at face value, the ra- dius constraint would imply that the WD mass is at least 1.3 M⊙. The high upper cooling-flow tempera- ture, kTmax ≥ 55 keV (see Table 1), supports the conclu- sion that the accretor is a massive WD. The relationship between kTmax and WD mass is due to the fact that that the Kepler velocity (v2 K = GM/R) is greater in the deep potential well of a more massive WD. Since the boundary-layer material is shock heated, and the initial post-shock temperature (Tmax) is proportional to veloc- ity squared, Tmax increases with WD mass. Alterna- tively, if we equate the amount of energy available per particle, (1/2)µmpv2 K, where µ is the mean molecular weight and mp is the mass of a proton, with the energy re- leased per particle in an isobaric cooling flow, (5/2)kTmax (Pandel et al. 2005), we see that kTmax ∝ v2 K ∝ GM/R. Although the determination of kTmax from X-ray emis- sion below 8 keV is highly uncertain, we can still ask what such a high kTmax would imply if it is confirmed by an instrument with greater high-energy sensitivity (such as SUZAKU). For their sample of 9 non-magnetic CVs, Pandel et al. (2005) found the upper cooling-flow temperature was roughly consistent with the expected kTmax = (3/5) kTvir, where Tvir is the virial temperature (defined by (3/2)kTvir = (1/2)µmpv2 K). Using the WD mass-radius relationship of Hansen & Kawaler (1994), a maximum cooling-flow temperature of kTmax > 55 keV implies M & 1.3 M⊙. The high absorbing columns for both the partial- covering and fully covering absorber, as well as the cover- ing factor of >0.7 for the partial-covering absorber (see Table 1), indicate that the X-ray source is highly ob- scured at this epoch. Since the X-ray emission region is small, the absorber that only partially covers the X- ray source must also be small. A possible source of this partially covering absorber is an accretion structure such as an accretion disk seen almost edge-on (as in OY Car; Pandel et al. 2005). We assume that the fully covering component of the absorption comprises both interstel- lar absorption (1.1×1022cm−2 from NASA/IPAC IRSA) and intrinsic absorption. The column density of this ab- sorber is probably high because the WD orbits within the strong, dense stellar wind from the red giant. RT Cru has an orbital period of ∼ 450 d (J. Miko lajewska, pri- vate communication), and therefore a binary separation on the order of an AU. This separation puts the WD well within the dense region of the red-giant wind. Month- time-scale variations in the absorption (not correlated with the orbital period) have been detected by Swif t (Kennea et al. 2007), suggesting that either the red-giant wind is clumpy, that the mass loss rate in the wind of the red giant is variable, or the accretion structure or struc- tures partially blocking the WD boundary layer must be unstable. 4.3. The Nature of RT Cru As shown by the INTEGRAL detection in 2003-2004 (Chernyakova et al. 2005), RT Cru can at times produce X-ray emission out to greater than 60 keV. From the broad-band flux densities reported by Chernyakova et al. (2005), the hard X-ray spectrum in 2003 - 2004 appears consistent with a powerlaw with photon index Γ = 2.7 (energy index α = 1.7), and the 16-100 keV luminos- ity at that time was approximately 10 L⊙ (d/2kpc)2. By 2005, however, the 16-100 keV luminosity had dropped, and the hard X-ray spectrum was closer to thermal (Kennea et al. 2007). To better appreciate the proper- ties of the unusual accreting WD in RT Cru, we briefly explore the possible sources of the powerlaw hard X-ray emission observed by INTEGRAL in 2003-2004. In par- ticular, we consider direct synchrotron emission, inverse- Compton (IC) scattering from a thermal distribution of electrons, and IC scattering from a non-thermal distri- bution of electrons. IC scattering from a non-thermal distribution of electrons turns out to be the most likely option. One way to generate a powerlaw energy spectrum is with synchrotron emission from a powerlaw distri- bution of relativistic electrons moving in a magnetic field. Most of the synchrotron emission from an elec- tron with Lorentz factor γ is emitted at a frequency νsync = (0.3/2π)(3 sin α/2)γ2 sync(qB/mec), where α is the pitch angle, q is the electron charge, B is the mag- netic field strength, me is the electron mass, and c is the speed of light (Rybicki & Lightman 1979). Since we did not detect X-ray pulsations from RT Cru, the magnetic field at the surface of the WD is probably not strong enough to disrupt the accretion flow, and therefore less than ∼ 104 G. Thus, even near the surface of the WD, Lorentz factors γsync of a few times 104 to 105 would be needed to produce significant direct synchrotron emission at 60 keV. We can estimate the maximum Lorentz fac- tor to which electrons will be accelerated by setting the diffusive shock acceleration time scale equal to the syn- chrotron cooling time scale. Following the approach of Markoff et al. (2001), we equate the synchrotron loss rate to a conservative acceleration rate (see Jokipii 1987) to find a maximum Lorentz factor to which electrons can be accelerated of γmax ≈ 2700(B/104 G)−1/2(ξ/100)−1/2, where ξ is the ratio of the diffusive scattering mean free path to the gyroradius. Thus γmax is one to two orders of magnitude below γsync. Moreover, whereas significant power from a distribution of synchrotron-emitting rela- tivistic electrons would also be expected at energies be- low 15 keV, the 16-100 keV X-ray luminosity of ∼ 10 L⊙ during 2003 and 2004 is already close to the total en- ergy budget available from accretion. Finally, to gen- erate the X-ray spectral index observed by INTEGRAL from direct synchrotron emission, one would need a dis- tribution of electrons that is much steeper than expected from standard theories of particle acceleration in shocks (Ellison et al. 1990). It is therefore unlikely that the hard X-ray emission from RT Cru was due to direct syn- 6 chrotron emission. As an aside, we note that the production of significant synchrotron emission at radio wavelengths would not re- quire such high Lorentz factors. The ratio of synchrotron power to IC power from an electron is equal to the ratio of the energy density in the magnetic field to energy density in photons (Rybicki & Lightman 1979). Examining this ratio as a function of distance from the WD, we expect a similar amount of power from direct synchrotron and IC scattering near the surface of the WD, where the B field could be strong (B ∼ 104 G). We therefore suggest that the next time RT Cru is in a powerlaw hard X-ray state like the one detected by INTEGRAL in 2003-2004, radio observations be performed to look for radio synchrotron emission. Hard X-rays can be produced with much lower Lorentz factors through IC scattering. For photons scattering off of a thermal distribution of electrons, Reynolds & Nowak (2003) give a relation between the observed photon in- dex Γ and the Compton y parameter, which is related to the factor by which the average photon energy in- creases. A steep photon index of Γ > 2 indicates a y parameter less than 1, in which case there is no sig- nificant up-scattering. Therefore, since RT Cru had a steep photon index of Γ ≈ 2.7, scattering off of a ther- mal distribution of electrons could not have been re- sponsible for the powerlaw hard X-ray emission. Non- thermal, relativistic electrons must have been involved in producing the powerlaw spectrum observed by INTE- GRAL. RT Cru thus contains a white dwarf that can accelerate electrons to relativistic speeds. Three other systems that contain WDs that also generate relativis- tic electrons are CH Cyg, RS Oph, and possibly R Aqr, all of which have jets (Rupen et al. 2007; O'Brien et al. 2006; Crocker et al. 2001; Nichols et al. 2007). Assuming now that the powerlaw hard X-ray spectrum was due to IC scattering from a powerlaw distribution of relativistic electrons, we can estimate the location of the scattering electrons. Since the strength of a dipole B field falls like 1/r3, whereas the energy density in the photon field only falls like 1/r2, IC scattering will dominate as one moves farther from the WD. If we ask how far away from the radiation source the IC region should be to give us an IC cooling time on the order of a year (the approx- imate duration of the powerlaw hard X-ray state), we find that it should be a few tenths of an AU away. Given the orbital period for this systems, that could put the IC emission region either between the WD and the red giant, as in a colliding-winds region, above the WD disk in a corona, or at the base of a jet. A model consisting of IC scattering off of relativistic electrons in a corona or at the base of a jet reproduces the observed hard X- ray emission well in X-ray binaries (Markoff et al. 2005). The steep powerlaw index, which is similar to that seen in the steep powerlaw state in microquasars, could be due Luna & Sokoloski to a low scattering optical depth (Rybicki & Lightman 1979). 5. CONCLUSIONS We have observed the first symbiotic star with X-ray emission out to greater than 60 keV with the HETG on Chandra. The stochastic variability and cooling-flow type spectrum suggest that RT Cru is powered by ac- cretion onto a WD through a disk with an optically thin boundary layer. The accretion rate is near the top of the range for which the boundary layer can remain optically thin. The high initial temperature of the cooling flow, and the high luminosity given the accretion rate from the spectral fit suggest that the WD in RT Cru could be quite massive. More generally speaking, it would be difficult to get such hard X-ray emission from accretion onto a low- mass WD with a shallow potential well and low Kepler velocity. Given the nature of the powerlaw hard X-ray emission previously observed by INTEGRAL, it therefore appears that the accreting, non-magnetic WD in RT Cru is able to generate a non-thermal, powerlaw distribution of electrons and very hard X-ray emission through IC scattering. Three other systems in which WDs can accel- erate electrons to relativistic speeds (RS Oph, CH Cyg, and possibly R Aqr; Rupen et al. 2007; O'Brien et al. 2006; Crocker et al. 2001; Nichols et al. 2007) all have jets. Radio observations of RT Cru during the next pow- erlaw hard X-ray state like that observed by INTEGRAL in 2003 and 2004 could play an important role in diag- nosing this system, and determining the extent to which some symbiotic stars might constitute the nanoquasar analog to microquasars (Zamanov & Marziani 2002). We thank the referee, Marina Orio, for comments and suggestions which improved the final quality of this article. We also thank K. Mukai, F. Paerels, T. Maccarone, and A. J. Bird for useful discussions, R. Lopes de Oliveira and D. Huenemoerder for help with the data analysis, and S. Markoff for comments on the manuscript. G.J.M. Luna acknowledges support from CNPq (process 0141805/2003-0) and FAPESP (process 02/08816-5). J.L.S. is supported by an NSF Astron- omy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship under award AST-0302055. Support for this work was pro- vided by the National Aeronautics and Space Admin- istration through Chandra Award Numbers DD5-6034X and NNX06AI16G issued by the Chandra X-ray Obser- vatory Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian As- trophysical Observatory for and on behalf of the National Aeronautics Space Administration under contract NAS8- 03060. We acknowledge with thanks the variable star observations from the AAVSO International Database contributed by observers worldwide and used in this re- search. REFERENCES Arnaud K. A., 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, eds. Jacoby G. and Barnes J., p17, ASP Conf. Series volume 101. Anders E. & Grevesse N., 1989, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53, 197 Barlow, E. J., Knigge, C., Bird, A. J., J Dean, A., Clark, D. J., Hill, A. B., Molina, M., & Sguera, V. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 224 Bird, A. J., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 175 Belczy´nski, K., Mikolajewska, J., Munari, U., Ivison, R. J., Friedjung, M., 2000, A&AS, 146,407 Canizares, C. et al. 2005, 117, 1144 Chakrabarty, D., & Roche, P. 1997, ApJ, 489, 254 Chernyakova M., Courvoisier T. J., Rodriguez J., Lutovinov A., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 519,1 The Hard-X-Ray Symbiotic RT Cru 7 Cieslinski D., Elizalde F., Steiner J. E., 1994, A&A, 106, 243 Crocker M. M., Davis R. J., Eyres S. P. S., Bode M. F., Taylor A. R., Skopal A., Kenny H. T., 2001, MNRAS, 326,781 Crocker M. M., Davis R. J., Spencer R. E., Eyres S. P. S., Bode M. F., Skopal A., 2002, MNRAS, 335, 1100 Cropper M., Ramsay G., Wu K., 1998, MNRAS, 292, 222 Davidsen, A., Malina, R., & Bowyer, A. 1977, ApJ, 211, 866 Done, C., & Magdziarz, P. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 737 Ellison, D. C., Reynolds, S. P., & Jones, F. C. 1990, ApJ, 360, 702 Galloway, D. K., Sokoloski, J. L., & Kenyon, S. 2002, ApJ, 580, 1065 Houck, J. C.,High Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy with XMM-Newton and Chandra, Proceedings of the international workshop held at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory of University College London, Holmbury St Mary, Dorking, Surrey, UK, October 24 - 25, 2002, Ed. Branduardi-Raymont, G., published electronically and stored on CD., meeting abstract Hachisu, I., & Kato, M. 2001, ApJ, 558, 323 Hansen, C. J., & Kawaler, S. D. 1994, Stellar Interiors. Physical Principles, Structure, and Evolution, XIII, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York Harris D. E., Mossman A. E., Walker R. C., 2004, ApJ, 615, 161 Inoue H., 1985, Sp. Sci. Rev., 40, 317 Jablonski, F. J., Pereira, M. G., Braga, J., & Gneiding, C. D. 1997, ApJ, 482, L171 Jokipii, J. R. 1987, ApJ, 313, 842 Jordan S., Muerset U. & Warner K., 1994, A& A, 283, 475 Karovska, M., Carilli, C. L., Mattei, J. A., 1998, JAVSO, 26,97 Karovska M., Schlegel E., Hack W., Raymond J., Wood B. E., 2005, ApJ, 623,137 Kenyon, S. J., The symbiotic stars, 1986, Cambridge University Press Kennea, J., Mukai, K., et al. 2007 in prep. Luna, G. J. M., Sokoloski J. L., Mukai K., Costa, R. D. D., in prep. Livio M., 1997, in: Accretion Phenomena and Related Outflows, IAU Colloquium 163, ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 121, D. T. Wickramasinghe, L. Ferrario & G. V. Bicknell, eds., p. 845 Makishima, K. 1986, in The Physics of accretion onto Compact Objects, eds. K. O. Mason, M. G. Watson & N. E. White, Springer Verlag Berlin, p249 Markoff, S., Falcke, H., & Fender, R. 2001, A&A, 372, L25 Markoff, S., Nowak, M. A., & Wilms, J. 2005, ApJ, 635, 1203 Masetti, N., et al. 2002, A&A, 382, 104 Masetti, N., Bassani L., Bird A. J., Bazzano A., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 528 Masetti N, Bassani L., Dean A. J., Ubertini P., Walter R., 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 715 Masetti, N., et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 277 Masetti, N., et al. 2007, A&A, 470, 331 Mushotzky R. F. & Szymkowiak A. E., 1988, Cooling Flows in Clusters and Galaxies ed. A. C. Fabian, p. 53 Mukai K., Kinkhabwala A., Peterson J. R., Kahn S. M., Paerels F., 2003, ApJ, 586, 77 Mukai K., Ishida M., Kilbourne C., Mori H., Terada Y., Chan K., Soong Y., 2007, PASJ, 59, 177 Muerset U., Wolff B., Jordan S., 1997, A& A, 319, 201 Narayan, R., & Popham, R. 1993, Nature, 362, 820 Nichols, J. S., DePasquale, J., Kellogg, E., Anderson, C. S., Sokoloski, J., & Pedelty, J. 2007, ApJ, 660, 651 O'Brien, T. J., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 279 Orio M., Zezas A., Munari U., Siviero A., Tepedelenlioglu E., 2007, ApJ, 661, 1105 Pandel D., C´ordova F. A., Mason K. O., Priedhorsky W. C., 2005, ApJ, 626, 396 Reynolds, C. S., & Nowak, M. A. 2003, Phys. Rep., 377, 389 Rupen, M. J., Mioduszewski, A. J., & Sokoloski, J. L. 2007, submitted to ApJ Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1979, New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1979, p. 179 Sokoloski, J. L. 1999, Ph.D. Thesis, U.C. Berkeley Sokoloski, J. L. 2003, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 303, 202 Sokoloski J. L., Bildsten L., Ho W. C. G. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 553 Sokoloski J., Kenyon S. J., 2003, ApJ, 584, 1021 Sokoloski J. L., Kenyon S. J., Espey B. R., Keyes C. D., McCandliss S. R., Kong A. K. H., Aufdenberg J. P., Filippenko A. V., Li W., Brocksopp C., et al., 2006, ApJ, 636,1002 Taylor A. R., Seaquist E. R., Mattei J. A., 1986, Nature, 319, 38 Tueller J., Gehrels N., Mushotzki R. F., Markwardt C. B., Kennea J. A., Burrows D. N., Mukai K., Sokoloski J., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 591 Tueller J., Barthelmy S., Burroes D., Falcone A., Gehrels N., Grupe D., Kennea J., Markwardt C. B., Mushotzky R. F., Skinner G. K., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 669 van Belle, G. T., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 521 van der Klis, M. 1989,in Timing Neutron Stars (Kluwer Academic Publishers), Ogelman, H., & van den Heuval, E. P. J. eds., p27 Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge) Zamanov, R., & Marziani, P. 2002, ApJ, 571, L77 8 Luna & Sokoloski Cooling-flow model parameters. TABLE 1 Parameter Value (Min, Max)a M b (10−9 M⊙ yr−1) kTmax (keV) nH : Full covering (1022 cm−2) nH : Partial covering (1022 cm−2) Covering Fraction Abundance (w.r.t. Solarc) FX LX d (10−12 erg cm−2 s−1) d (1034 erg s−1) 1.8 (1.6, 2.0) 80 (56, · · · ) 8.2 (7.7, 8.8) 65 (52, 78) 0.74 (0.69, 0.79) 0.30 (0.02, 0.45) 9.1 (7.5, 10.2) 3.1 (2.4, 3.9) Note. -- The model consists of optically thin thermal emission from an isobaric cooling flow with absorbers that both fully cover and partially cover the source, plus a Gaussian line. a 90% confidence upper and lower limits. b Accretion rate onto the compact object. c Using solar abundance of Anders & Grevesse (1989). d FX is the absorbed 0.3 -- 8.0 keV flux, and LX is the unabsorbed 0.3 -- 8.0 keV luminosity (d = 2 kpc). The Hard-X-Ray Symbiotic RT Cru 9 TABLE 2 Iron lines. Fe XXV Fe XXVI Fe Kα Line center (keV)a: EWb (eV): 6.9466.959 6.933 6.6936.706 6.677 6.3796.399 6.358 72 60 108 a Super- and subscripts represent 90% confidence upper and lower limits, respectively. b Gaussian-fit equivalent widths. EW uncertainties are on the order of 10 -- 15%. Luna & Sokoloski 10 1 − V e k 1 − s s t n u o C 2 χ 0.02 0.01 5×10−3 2×10−3 2 0 −2 2 Energy (keV) 5 Fig. 1. -- Undispersed (zeroth order) spectrum. The top panel shows the spectrum with the absorbed, isobaric cooling-flow model over- plotted. The bottom panel shows residuals with respect to this model (in units of χ2, where χ2 is shorthand for the difference between the data and the model, squared, divided by the variance, with the sign of the difference between the data and the model). Fig. 2. -- The iron-line complex from the combined HEG and MEG first-order (m = ±1) spectrum. The best fit model of a powerlaw plus three Gaussian emission lines is over-plotted. The bottom panel shows the residuals, in the same units as Fig. 1. The Hard-X-Ray Symbiotic RT Cru 11 Fig. 3. -- Chandra light curves for RT Cru, with a bin size of 508.28 s. The light curves include the undispersed light as well as the counts from the HEG and MEG m = ±1 orders. The top and bottom panels show the flux as a function of time in the energy ranges 0.3 -- 4.0 keV and 4.0 -- 8.0 keV, respectively. The 0.3 -- 4.0 keV emission is clearly variable on time scales of minutes to hours.
astro-ph/9611107	4	9611	1997-10-21T23:14:37	A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering	[ "astro-ph" ]	We use high-resolution N-body simulations to study the equilibrium density profiles of dark matter halos in hierarchically clustering universes. We find that all such profiles have the same shape, independent of halo mass, of initial density fluctuation spectrum, and of the values of the cosmological parameters. Spherically averaged equilibrium profiles are well fit over two decades in radius by a simple formula originally proposed to describe the structure of galaxy clusters in a cold dark matter universe. In any particular cosmology the two scale parameters of the fit, the halo mass and its characteristic density, are strongly correlated. Low-mass halos are significantly denser than more massive systems, a correlation which reflects the higher collapse redshift of small halos. The characteristic density of an equilibrium halo is proportional to the density of the universe at the time it was assembled. A suitable definition of this assembly time allows the same proportionality constant to be used for all the cosmologies that we have tested. We compare our results to previous work on halo density profiles and show that there is good agreement. We also provide a step-by-step analytic procedure, based on the Press-Schechter formalism, which allows accurate equilibrium profiles to be calculated as a function of mass in any hierarchical model.	astro-ph	astro-ph	A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering Julio F. Navarro 1 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. Carlos S. Frenk 2 Physics Department, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, England. Simon D.M. White 3 Max Planck Institut fur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild Strasse 1, D-85740, Garching, Germany. ABSTRACT We use high-resolution N-body simulations to study the equilibrium density profiles of dark matter halos in hierarchically clustering universes. We find that all such profiles have the same shape, independent of halo mass, of initial density fluctuation spectrum, and of the values of the cosmological parameters. Spherically averaged equilibrium profiles are well fit over two decades in radius by a simple formula originally proposed to describe the structure of galaxy clusters in a cold dark matter universe. In any particular cosmology the two scale parameters of the fit, the halo mass and its characteristic density, are strongly correlated. Low-mass halos are significantly denser than more massive systems, a correlation which reflects the higher collapse redshift of small halos. The characteristic density of an equilibrium halo is proportional to the density of the universe at the time it was assembled. A suitable definition of this assembly time allows the same proportionality constant to be used for all the cosmologies that we have tested. We compare our results to previous work on halo density profiles and show that there is good agreement. We also provide a step-by-step analytic procedure, based on the Press-Schechter formalism, which allows accurate equilibrium profiles to be calculated as a function of mass in any hierarchical model. Subject headings: cosmology: theory – dark matter – galaxies: halos – methods: numerical 1Bart J. Bok Fellow. E-mail: [email protected] 2E-mail: [email protected] 3E-mail: [email protected] – 2 – 1. Introduction It is twenty-five years since the discovery that galaxies are surrounded by extended massive halos of dark matter. A variety of observational probes – disk rotation curves, stellar kinematics, gas rings, motions of globular clusters, planetary nebulae and satellite galaxies, hot gaseous atmospheres, gravitational lensing effects – are now making it possible to map halo mass distributions in some detail. These distributions are intimately linked to the nature of the dark matter, to the way halos formed, and to the cosmological context of halo formation. Insight into these links came first from analytic studies. Building on the early work of Gunn & Gott (1972), similarity solutions were obtained by Fillmore & Goldreich (1984) and Bertschinger (1985) for the self-similar collapse of spherical perturbations in an Einstein-de Sitter universe. Such solutions necessarily resemble power laws in the virialized regions. Hoffman & Shaham (1985) and Hoffman (1988) extended this analysis by considering open universes, and by modeling as scale-free spherical perturbations the ob jects which form by hierarchical clustering from power-law initial density perturbation spectra (P (k) ∝ kn ). They argued that isothermal structure (ρ ∝ r−2 ) should be expected in an Einstein-de Sitter universe if n ≤ −2, and that steeper profiles should be expected for larger n and in open universes. Despite the schematic nature of these arguments, their general predictions were verified as numerical data became available from N -body simulations of hierarchical cosmologies. Power-law fits to halo density profiles in a variety of simulations all showed a clear steepening as n increases or the density of the universe decreases (Frenk et al. 1985, 1988; Quinn et al. 1986; Efstathiou et al. 1988; Zurek, Quinn & Salmon 1988; Warren et al. 1992; Crone, Evrard & Richstone 1994). An apparent exception was the work of West et al. (1987), who found that galaxy cluster density profiles show no clear dependence on n. Significant departures from power-law behaviour were first reported by Frenk et al. (1988), who noted that halo profiles in cold dark matter (CDM) simulations steepen progressively with increasing radius. Efstathiou et al. (1988) found similar departures – at odds with the analytic predictions – in their simulations of scale-free hierarchical clustering. They also noted that these departures were most obvious in their best resolved halos. Similar effects were noted by Dubinski & Carlberg (1991) in a high resolution simulation of a galaxy-sized CDM halo. These authors found their halo to be well described by a density profile with a gently changing logarithmic slope, specifically that proposed by Hernquist (1990). In earlier papers of this series we used high-resolution simulations to study the formation of CDM halos with masses spanning about four orders of magnitude, ranging from dwarf galaxy halos to those of rich galaxy clusters (Navarro, Frenk & White 1995, 1996). This work showed that the equilibrium density profiles of CDM halos of all masses can be accurately fit over two decades in radius by the simple formula, ρ(r) ρcrit = δc (r/rs )(1 + r/rs )2 , (1) – 3 – where rs is a scale radius, δc is a characteristic (dimensionless) density, and ρcrit = 3H 2/8πG is the critical density for closure. This profile differs from the Hernquist (1990) model only in its asymptotic behaviour at r ≫ rs (it tends to r−3 instead of r−4 ). Power-law fits over a restricted radial range have slopes which depend on the range fitted, steepening from −1 near the center to −3 at large r/rs . This similarity between CDM halos of widely differing mass is surprising in view of the strong dependence on power spectrum shape reported in earlier studies. The effective slope of the CDM power spectrum varies from neff ≈ −2 on galactic scales to neff ≈ −1 on cluster scales, so one might have expected shallower profiles in galaxy halos than in clusters. In fact, the opposite is true; low-mass halos are denser, i.e. have higher values of δc , than high-mass halos. This property reflects the higher collapse redshift of the smaller systems. Power-law fits actually yield steeper slopes for less massive halos both when carried out at a fixed radius and when carried out at a fixed fraction of the virial radius (see Figures 3 and 4 of Navarro, Frenk & White 1996). We argue below that the apparent relationship between profile shape and initial power spectrum seen in earlier work results from systematic differences in the characteristic density of the halos chosen when comparing different models. This interpretation is reinforced by the recent work of Cole & Lacey (1996) and Tormen, Bouchet & White (1996), who find that the profiles of massive halos formed from power-law spectra are well described by eq. 1. They also confirm the strong correlation between δc and halo mass seen in our earlier work, and they find that, at a given mass, halos are denser when n is larger. Thus, the spectral index n seems to control the exact relationship between characteristic density and halo mass, rather than the effective slope of the density profile. It is clear from this discussion that a comprehensive study of this problem needs to consider the role of at least three factors: the halo mass, the power spectrum of initial density fluctuations, and the values of the cosmological parameters. In this paper we present the results of a large set of N-body simulations specifically designed to address these issues. We consider a variety of hierarchical clustering models, including CDM and power-law initial fluctuation spectra, as well as different values of the cosmological parameters Ω0 and Λ. In each cosmology we study halos spanning a large range in mass, carefully choosing numerical parameters so that all systems are simulated with comparable numerical resolution. The plan of the paper is as follows. Our numerical experiments are described in §2. In §3 we present our results and in §4 we discuss them in the context of earlier work. In §5 we summarize our main conclusions. An appendix lays out the formulae necessary to calculate analytically the density profile of an equilibrium halo of any mass in any hierarchical cosmology. 2. The Numerical Experiments – 4 – 2.1. The Cosmological Models We analyze the structure of dark matter halos in 8 different cosmologies. Five are Einstein-de Sitter (Ω0 = 1) models with various power spectra: the standard biased CDM spectrum (SCDM model: Ω0 = 1, h = 0.5, σ8 = 0.63) and four power-law or “scale-free” spectra with indices n = 0, −0.5, −1, and −1.5. Two further models also have power-law spectra (n = 0 and −1) but in an open universe (Ω0 = 0.1). The last model we consider is a low-density CDM model with a flat geometry (CDMΛ: Ω0 = 0.25, Λ = 0.75, h = 0.75, σ8 = 1.3). (Here and throughout this paper we express the cosmological constant Λ in units of 3H 2 0 , so that a low-density universe with a flat geometry has Ω0 + Λ = 1. We also adopt the standard convention of writing the present Hubble constant as H0 = 100 h km s−1 Mpc−1 .) The normalization of the CDM models is specified by σ8 , the rms mass fluctuation in spheres of radius 8 h−1 Mpc. Because of self-similarity, the normalization of the scale-free models is arbitrary. The evolutionary state of these models may be fully specified by a single parameter, the current value of the “nonlinear mass”, M⋆ (z ). This mass scale is defined by requiring that the variance of the linear overdensity field at redshift z = 0, smoothed with a top-hat filter enclosing a mass M = M⋆ , should equal the square of the critical density threshold for spherical collapse by 0 (M⋆ (z )) = δ2 redshift z : ∆2 crit(z , Ω0 , Λ). (See the Appendix for details on the computation of δcrit). This definition provides a “natural” way to scale the scale-free simulations to physical units and to compare different cosmological models. In scale-free models the mass scale defined by M⋆ (z ) is the only physical scale, and therefore the structure of halos can depend on mass only through the ratio M /M⋆ . 2.2. The Simulations Large cosmological N–body simulations are required to simulate the evolution of dark matter halos in their full cosmological context. However, such simulations are not generally well suited to explore a large range of halo masses. This is because systems of differing mass formed in a single simulation are resolved to differing degrees. More massive systems are better resolved because they contain more particles and because the gravitational softening is a smaller fraction of the virial radius. These systematic differences can introduce insidious numerical artifacts in the mass trends that we wish to investigate. We circumvent this problem by using the procedure outlined by Navarro, Frenk & White (1996). Halos are first identified in cosmological N-body simulations of large periodic boxes and then resimulated individually at higher resolution. During the resimulation the remainder of the original simulation is treated only to the accuracy needed to model tidal effects on the halo of interest. The advantage of this procedure is that numerical parameters can be tuned so that all halos are simulated with comparable resolution. Its main disadvantage is that only one halo is modeled per simulation, so that many simulations are needed to compile a representative halo sample. – 5 – 2.2.1. The cosmological simulations The cosmological simulations were carried out using the P3M code of Efstathiou et al. (1985). The desired initial power spectrum was generated by using the Zel’dovich approximation to displace particles from a uniform initial load. The uniform load we used was either a “glass” configuration (White 1996) or a cubic grid. For simulations with power-law power spectra, the amplitude of the initial displacements was chosen by setting the power of the perturbed density field to the white-noise level at the Nyquist frequency of the particle grid. These simulations followed 106 particles on a 1283 mesh and were stopped when the nonlinear mass, M⋆ , corresponded to 1, 000-2, 000 particles. We identify this time with the present (z = 0). Since clustering evolves faster for more negative values of n, an expansion factor of 9.5 was sufficient for n = −1.5 whereas an expansion factor of 90 was required for n = 0 (Ω0 = 1). Open models require even longer integrations, an expansion factor exceeding 150 for n = 0 and Ω0 = 0.1. These simulations used the time-stepping and numerical scheme described in Efstathiou et al (1988). (Note, however, that the definition of M⋆ in that paper differs from the one we use here.) We ran two P3M simulations for each of our CDM models. The SCDM runs followed 643 particles in periodic boxes of 180 h−1 and 15 h−1 Mpc and were stopped when σ8 = 0.63 (M⋆ ≈ 1.6 × 1013h−1 M⊙ ), the time which we identify with the present. The CDMΛ runs followed 106 particles in boxes of 140 h−1 and 46.67 h−1 Mpc, until σ8 = 1.3 (M⋆ ≈ 4.1 × 1013 h−1 M⊙ ). 2.2.2. The individual halo simulations Halos to be resimulated at higher resolution were selected randomly at z = 0 from a list of clumps identified using a friends-of-friends group finder with linking length set to 10% of the mean interparticle separation. We chose masses in the range 0.1–10M⋆ for the power-law models and 0.01–100M⋆ for the CDM models. (The mass range is larger for the CDM models because in this case halos were chosen from two parent cosmological simulations with different box sizes.) Because we are interested the structure of equilibrium halos we were careful not to choose for analysis any halo which is far from virial equilibrium. In practice, we analyze each resimulated halo at the time between redshifts 0.05 and 0 when it is closest to dynamical equilibrium, defined as the time when the ratio of kinetic to potential energy is closest to 0.5 for material within the virial radius. [Throughout this paper, we measure halo masses, M200 , within a virial radius, r200 , defined as the radius of a sphere of mean interior density 200 ρcrit . Halo circular speeds, V200 = (GM200 /r200 )1/2 , are also measured at this radius unless otherwise specified. Numerical experiments show that for Ω = 1 this radius approximately separates the virialized and infall regions (Cole & Lacey 1996). For convenience we continue to use these definitions when Ω0 6= 1.] Once a halo is chosen for resimulation, the particles within its virial radius are traced back to the initial conditions, where a small box containing all of them is drawn. This box is filled with ∼ 323 particles on a cubic grid which are then perturbed using the waves of the original – 6 – P3M simulation, together with extra high-frequency waves added to fill out the power spectrum between the Nyquist frequencies of the old and new particle grids. The regions beyond the “high-resolution” box are coarsely sampled with a few thousand particles of radially increasing mass in order to account for the large-scale tidal fields present in the original simulation. This procedure ensures the formation of a clump similar in all respects to the one selected in the P3M run, except for the improved numerical resolution. The size of the high-resolution box scales naturally with the total mass of each system and, as a result, all resimulated halos have about the same number of particles within the virial radius at z = 0, typically between 5, 000 and 10, 000. The extensive tests presented in Navarro, Frenk & White (1996) indicate that this number of particles is adequate to resolve the structure of a halo over approximately two decades in radius. We therefore choose the gravitational softening, hg , to be 1% of the virial radius in all cases. (This is the scale-length of a spline softening; see Navarro & White 1993 for a definition.) The tree-code carries out simulations in physical, rather than comoving, coordinates, and uses individual timesteps for each particle. The minimum timestep depends on the maximum density resolved in each case, but was typically 10−5H −1 0 . As discussed in Navarro, Frenk & White (1996), numerically convergent results require that the initial redshift of each run, zinit , should be high enough that all resolved scales in the initial box are still in the linear regime. In order to satisfy this condition, we chose zinit so that the median initial displacement of particles in the high-resolution box was always less than the mean interparticle separation. Problems with this procedure may arise if zinit is so high that the gravitational softening (which is kept fixed in physical coordinates) becomes significantly larger that the mean initial interparticle separation. We found this to be a problem only for the smallest masses, M ∼<M⋆ , in the n = 0, Ω0 = 0.1 model. In this case the initial redshift prescribed by the median displacement condition is zinit > 700 and the gravitational softening is then a significant fraction of the initial box. This can affect the collapse of the earliest progenitors of these systems and so introduce spurious effects. We therefore limit our investigation to M ∼>M⋆ in this particular cosmological model. Further tests of the effects of particle number, timestep size, and gravitational softening are given by Tormen et al. (1996). Their results confirm that the numerical parameters chosen here are adequate to give stable and accurate results. 3. Results 3.1. Time Evolution Figure 1 illustrates the time evolution of halos of different mass selected from the Ω0 = 1, n = −1 series. Time runs from top to bottom and mass increases from left to right. The box size in each column is chosen so as to contain always approximately the same number of particles. The redshifts of each snapshot have been chosen so that the nonlinear mass M⋆ increases by factors of 4 from z2 to z1 and from z1 to z0 = 0. This figure illustrates convincingly that low-mass halos complete their assembly earlier than more massive systems. – 7 – 3.2. Density Profiles Figure 2 shows spherically averaged density profiles at z = 0 for one of the least and one of the most massive halos for each set of cosmological parameters. These halos span almost four orders of magnitude in mass in the case of the CDM models, and about two orders of magnitude in mass in the power-law models. Radial units are kpc for CDM models (scale at the top), and are arbitrary in the power-law panels. Density is in units of 1010M⊙/kpc3 in the CDM models and in arbitrary units in the others. Solid lines are fits to each halo profile using eq. 1. This simple formula provides a good fit to the structure of all halos over about two decades in radius, from the gravitational softening (indicated by arrows in Figure 2) to about the virial radius. The quality of the fit is essentially independent of halo mass or cosmological model and implies a remarkable uniformity in the equilibrium structure of dark matter halos in different hierarchical clustering models. The solid and dashed lines in Figure 3 show the profile fits of Figure 2 but with the radius scaled to the virial radius of each halo. This scaling removes the intrinsic dependence of size on mass (more massive halos are bigger) and allows a meaningful comparison between halos of different mass. From the definition of virial radius, the “concentration” of a halo, c = r200 /rs , and the characteristic density, δc , are linked by the relation δc = 200 3 c3 [ln(1 + c) − c/(1 + c)] . (2) Thus at given halo mass (specified by M200 ), there is a single free parameter in eq. 1, which may be expressed either as the characteristic density, δc , or as the concentration parameter, c. This free parameter varies systematically with mass; Figure 3 shows that c and δc decrease with increasing halo mass. A universal density profile implies a universal circular velocity profile, Vc(r) = (GM (r)/r)1/2 . This is illustrated in Figure 4, where we plot Vc -profiles for the same systems shown in Figure 2. As in Figure 3, radii are plotted in units of the virial radius; circular speeds have been normalized to the value at the virial radius, V200 . The circular velocity curve implied by eq. 1 is V200 (cid:19)2 (cid:18) Vc (r) where x = r/r200 is the radius in units of the virial radius. Circular velocities rise near the center, reach a maximum (Vmax ) at xmax ∼ 2/c, and decline near the virial radius. More centrally concentrated halos (higher δc or higher c) are characterized by higher values of Vmax /V200 . The dashed lines in Figure 4 show plots of eq. 3 with parameter values derived from the fits to the density profiles of Figure 2. The dotted lines are fits using a Hernquist (1990) model constrained ln(1 + cx) − (cx)/(1 + cx) ln(1 + c) − c/(1 + c) (3) = 1 x , – 8 – to match the location of the maximum of the Vc -curve. The two fits are indistinguishable near the center, but the Hernquist model underestimates Vc near the virial radius. This disagreement becomes more pronounced in lower mass systems, for which δc and Vmax /V200 are larger. 3.3. The mass dependence of halo structure The mass-density dependence pointed out above is further illustrated in Figure 5, where we plot δc versus mass (expressed in units of M⋆ ) for all the systems in each series. An equivalent plot, illustrating the mass dependence of the concentration, c, is shown in Figure 6. (The panel on the upper-left, corresponding to the SCDM model, is equivalent to Figure 7 of Navarro, Frenk & White 1996). The characteristic density of a halo increases towards lower masses in all the cosmological models considered. This result supports the idea that the M200 -δc relation is a direct result of the higher redshift of collapse of less massive systems, and suggests a simple model to describe the mass-density relation. This model assigns to each halo of mass M (identified at z = 0) a collapse redshift, zcoll (M , f ), defined as the time at which half the mass of the halo was first contained in progenitors more massive than some fraction f of the final mass. With this definition, zcoll can be computed simply using the Press-Schechter formalism (e.g. Lacey & Cole 1993), δcrit (zcoll ) − δ0 0 (M )) (cid:19) = erfc(cid:18) crit q2(∆2 0 (f M ) − ∆2 where ∆2 0 (M ) is the linear variance of the power spectrum at z = 0 smoothed with a top-hat filter of mass M , δcrit (z ) is the density threshold for spherical collapse by redshift z , and δ0 crit = δcrit (0). [This definition can be extended to halos identified at any redshift z0 by replacing δ0 crit by δcrit (z0 ) in eq. 4.] Assuming the characteristic density of a halo to be proportional to the density of the universe at the corresponding zcoll then implies (4) 1 2 , δc (M f ) = C Ω0 (1 + zcoll (M , f ))3 (5) where C is a proportionality constant which might, in principle, depend on f and on the power spectrum. We will see below that f ≪ 1 is needed for this argument to give a good fit to our simulation 0 (f M ) ≫ ∆2 data. In this limit ∆2 0 (M ) and eq. 4 reduces to δcrit (zcoll ) = δ0 crit + C ′∆0 (f M ), (6) where C ′ ≈ 0.7. For f ≪ 1, δcrit (zcoll ) ≫ δ0 crit for all masses in the range of interest, so that δcrit(zcoll ) ∝ ∆0 (f M ). Since M⋆ (zcoll ) is defined by ∆0 (M⋆ (zcoll )) = δcrit (zcoll ), this equation implies that the characteristic density of a halo is proportional to the mean density of the universe at the time when M⋆ ≈ f M , ie. when the characteristic non-linear mass is a fixed small fraction of the final halo mass. For scale-free models this implies δc ∝ M −(n+3)/2 , the same scaling that links M⋆ (z ) and the mean cosmic density at redshift z . – 9 – Figure 5 shows the correlations predicted from eq. 5 for three values of the parameter f : 0.5, 0.1, and 0.01. The value of the proportionality constant, C (f ), is chosen in each case in order to match the results of the Einstein-de Sitter simulations for M = M⋆ . These values are given in Table 1. The same values of C (f ) are used to plot the curves in the panels corresponding to the low-density models. Some interesting results emerge from inspection of Figure 5 and Table 1. (i) The agreement between the mass-density dependence predicted by eq. 5 and the results of the Einstein-de Sitter simulations improves for smaller values of f . This is also true for the low-density models. Once C (f ) is fixed by matching the results of the Einstein-de Sitter models, the same value of C (f ) provides a good match to the low density models only if f ∼<0.01. Interestingly, for f = 0.01 approximately the same value of the proportionality constant, C ≈ 3 × 103 , seems to fit all our simulations. (ii) The characteristic density of M⋆ halos decreases systematically for more negative values of the spectral index n. At M = M⋆ , SCDM halos are the least dense in our Ω0 = 1 series, less concentrated still than those corresponding to n = −1.5. This is consistent with the general trend because, according to eqs. 4 and 5, the characteristic density of a halo of mass M⋆ is controlled by the shape of the power spectrum on scales ∼ f M⋆ . This is about ∼ 1011M⊙ for f ≈ 0.01 and the effective slope of the CDM spectrum on this mass scale is neff ∼ −2. (iii) For the power-law models with n = 0 and −1 the characteristic density at a given M /M⋆ increases as Ω0 decreases. Such a trend is plausible since we expect the collapse redshift of halos of a given mass to increase as Ω0 decreases. On the other hand, halos formed in the low-density CDMΛ universe are actually less dense than those formed in the standard biased CDM model because δc depends not only on collapse redshift but also on Ω0 (see eq. 5). Although reducing Ω0 increases the collapse redshift, the increase in δc from the (1 + zcoll )3 factor can be outweighed by the change in Ω0 . In the CDMΛ model the two effects can combine to give a reduction in δc as Ω0 decreases. (We remind the reader that δc is defined relative to the critical density rather than the mean density.) (iv) Each halo has a characteristic maximum circular speed, Vmax (see eq. 3), which is strongly correlated with its mass. This is shown in Figure 7, where we also plot least squares fits of the form M200 ∝ V α max to the data in each series. Consistent with the trends shown in Figures 5 and 6, the correlation steepens as n increases; we find α ∼ 3.2 – 3.3 for CDM models and α > 5 for n = 0. Note also that the correlations are extremely tight; the rms scatter in log M200 is less than ∼ 0.1 in all cases. This is in part a consequence of the generally good fit of the density profile of eq. 1. The ratio Vmax /V200 increases only logarithmically with the central concentration of the halo, and changes only by about a factor of two as δc varies by four orders of magnitude between 103 and 107 . As a result, the M200 -Vmax relation does not deviate much from the M200 -V200 relation which, by definition, has zero scatter. This has important consequences for the expected tightness of empirical correlations between mass and characteristic velocity, such as the Tully-Fisher relation. We intend to return to this issue in – 10 – future work. The results in Figures 5–7 support our conclusion that the characteristic density of a halo is controlled mainly by the mean matter density of the universe at a suitably defined time of collapse. One important test of this interpretation is to measure zcoll directly in the simulations and to compare the result to eq. 5. To do this we identify clumps at every output time using our friends-of-friends group-finder with linking length set to 20% of the current mean interparticle separation. We then trace the particles in the most massive clump identified at z = 0 (which typically has a mean overdensity of ∼ 200) and, at each redshift, add up the total mass in clumps which contain any of these particles and which are individually more massive than 10% of the final mass. We identify zcoll with the redshift at which this mass first exceeds half of the final mass. This is roughly equivalent to the analytic procedure outlined in eq. 4 for f = 0.1. (We decided to use f = 0.1 rather than f = 0.01 because the smaller value results in very high collapse redshifts, often before the first output in the simulation.) The main difference is that some of the mass from the high redshift progenitors ends up outside the virial radius at z = 0. This causes a slight bias of the measured collapse redshifts towards higher values than the Press-Schechter predictions. The correlation between δc/Ω0 and (1 + zcoll )3 obtained using this procedure is shown in Figure 8. All halos in Einstein-de Sitter models are shown with filled circles; those in open universes with open circles; and those in the CDMΛ model with starred symbols. The solid line is the relation predicted by eq. 5 for C = 5 × 103 . This is clearly an excellent approximation to the results of the numerical simulations, and confirms that the mean matter density of the universe at the time of collapse is the main factor determining the characteristic density of a halo. Note that the value of the proportionality constant is slightly lower than the values given in Table 1 for f = 0.1. This difference compensates for the slight bias towards higher collapse redshifts introduced by our numerical procedure. A summary of our results is presented in Figure 9. The panels on the left compile the fits (for f = 0.01) to the mass dependence of δc and c in the Einstein-de Sitter models. The panels on the right compare the Einstein-de Sitter results with those for low-density models. As noted above, the typical density of M⋆ -halos increases with n. However, the difference between models becomes less pronounced at higher masses, and is almost negligible at M ∼> 10M⋆ . Halos of a given M /M⋆ in low density universes can have either lower or higher characteristic densities than their Einstein-de Sitter counterparts, depending on the competing effects of the collapse redshift and the value of Ω0 . Note that all the curves in Figure 9 use the same value, f = 0.01, and essentially the same value of the proportionality constant C ≈ 3 × 103 (see eq. 5). Thus, once calibrated for an Einstein-de Sitter model, it is possible to apply eqs. 4 and 5 to predict the characteristic density of halos formed in other hierarchically clustering models. In the Appendix we provide a detailed description of how to compute δc (M ) numerically for a variety of cosmologies. – 11 – 3.4. The scatter in the correlations We examine now the origin of the scatter in the correlations presented above. In particular, we explore whether at fixed mass the dispersion in the measured values of δc is due to variations either in the collapse redshift or in the global angular momentum of the system. As shown by Figures 10 and 11, the bulk of the scatter in δc at a given M /M⋆ can be attributed to small differences in the redshift of collapse. Figure 10 shows that the δc -deviations from the solid-line fits in Figure 5 (i.e. those for f = 0.01) correlate strongly with deviations in the redshift of collapse. (The latter are measured from least-square fits to the M200 vs (1 + zcoll ) correlations measured directly from the simulations.) Furthermore, the two residuals seem to correlate just as expected from eq. 5, i.e. ∆ log δc = 3∆ log(1 + zcoll ). (We note that the magnitude of this scatter may not be fully representative of the dispersion in halo properties corresponding to each cosmological model, since the sample has been selected so as to minimize departures from equilibrium.) This relation is indicated by the solid line and is seen to reproduce very well the trend observed in Figure 10. Figure 11 shows the same δc -residuals of Figure 10, but now as a function of the scatter in the mass–rotation parameter (M200 vs λ) correlation. (The rotation parameter is defined by λ = J E 1/2 /GM 5/2 , where J is the angular momentum and E is the binding energy of the halo. The median λ in our series is ∼ 0.04, in good agreement with previous studies.) We find no discernible correlation between M /M⋆ and λ or between the δc - and λ-residuals (Figure 11). This provides further evidence supporting our contention that the redshift of collapse is the primary factor determining the characteristic density of a halo. 4. Comparison with previous work The main conclusion of our study, that the shape of halo density profiles is independent of cosmological context, appears to contradict previous work on this sub ject. As discussed in §1, a strong dependence of the slope of the density profile on the spectral index n and the density parameter Ω0 has been established by a number of analytic and numerical studies. We now show that our results actually include and extend those of previous workers, and we offer an attractive explanation for some discrepancies found in the literature. We first address the claim by Quinn et al. (1986), Efstathiou et al (1988), Zurek et al. (1988), and Warren et al. (1992) that halo density profiles steepen with increasing values of the spectral index n in an Einstein-de Sitter universe. This claim is based on the discovery that circular velocity profiles of galaxy-sized halos are relatively flat for n ≈ −2 (or for SCDM; Frenk et al. 1985) but decline progressively faster at large r for larger n. Figure 12 shows that we find the same trend if we analyze our data in the same fashion as these authors. In this figure we plot, in linear units, the Vc -profile of an M⋆ halo for different values of n. Each curve has been computed using eq. 3 and the values of c obtained from the fits presented in Figure 9. Since all these halos have the same mass, they also have the same virial radius and circular speed, r200 and V200 , – 12 – respectively, which we have used as normalizing factors. The linear units in Figure 12 obscure the fact that the form of the curves is the same in all cases, and encourage one to conclude, as did previous authors, that halo rotation curves steepen with increasing n. In fact this trend is present because M⋆ halos collapse earlier, and so are denser, for larger values of n. We note that the trend with n in Figure 12 is sensitive to the choice of halo mass. Had we used halos with M < M⋆ the trend would have been stronger. On the other hand, very massive halos (M ∼>10 M⋆ ) have similar characteristic densities, irrespective of n (see Figure 9). Thus, had we plotted very massive halos in Figure 12 we would have concluded that the density profile depends only weakly on n (at least for Ω0 = 1). This is reminiscent of the claim by West et al. (1987) that the structure of galaxy cluster halos is independent of n in Einstein-de Sitter universes. Our analysis suggests an explanation for this apparently discrepant result. By considering only the most massive systems in their simulations, West et al. focused on a mass range where the dependence of δc on n is minimal, and so concluded (correctly) that cluster profiles depend very weakly on initial power spectrum. A similar explanation accounts for the weak dependence of halo density profile on spectral index n and on Ω0 reported by Crone et al. (1994). These authors chose to combine the 35 most massive clumps in each of their cosmological simulations in order to produce an “average” density profile for each value of n and Ω0 . They then fitted power laws of the form ρ(r) ∝ rγ to these profiles in the radial range corresponding to density contrasts between 100 and 3000. For Ω0 = 1, this procedure yielded γ values that decrease from −2.2 to −2.5 as n increases from −2 to 0 (see the curve labeled “EdS” in their Figure 4). Our results show this weak trend to be a consequence of the averaging procedure they adopted. The shape of the halo mass function depends strongly on n and is increasingly peaked around M ≈ M⋆ for larger values of n. Thus, combining the 35 most massive clumps in a simulation results in different “effective” masses for different values of n, with a bias towards larger values of M /M⋆ for more negative values of n. Applying the same selection procedure as Crone et al. to our own cosmological simulations we find that the median mass of these halo ensembles increases from ∼ M⋆ for n = 0 to ∼ 6M⋆ for n = −1.5. As illustrated in Figure 13, fitting power-laws to the density profiles of these “average” halos results in a weak steepening with n similar to the trend reported by Crone et al. The slopes of γ ∼ −3 which they found for low density models are also easily understood, since in these cases they fit a radial range which extends well outside our nominal virial radius r200 . Our results are also in agreement with recent work by Cole & Lacey (1996) and Tormen et al. (1996), who analyzed the structure of massive halos (M > M⋆ ) in scale-free universes. The general correlations with mass which they report (more massive halos tend to be less centrally concentrated than less massive halos) agree well with the results we present in §3. At a given halo mass, however, Cole & Lacey’s halos are significantly less concentrated than ours. For example, for M⋆ halos they find c ∼ 12 and ∼ 17 for n = −1 and 0, respectively (Ω0 = 1), compared with c ∼ 17 and ∼ 30 in our simulations (see connected symbols in the lower-right panel of Figure 9). On the other hand, the results of Tormen et al. (1996) are in very good agreement with ours; – 13 – they find c ∼ 10 for a 10M⋆ halo formed in an n = −1, Ω0 = 1 universe, which compares well with c ∼ 9 that we find for a similar system. As discussed in detail by Tormen et al, the discrepancy between our results and those of Cole & Lacey is likely to be due in part to the poorer numerical resolution of their simulations. Indeed, their simulations used gravitational softenings that are 2-3 times larger than ours and timesteps which are also significantly longer than the typical values in our simulations. Both of these effects can artificially lower the central concentration of a halo. A concurrent factor may be the averaging procedure adopted by Cole & Lacey. These authors constructed average density profiles by co-adding all halos of similar mass identified in their cosmological simulations, regardless of their dynamical state. This sample contains a number of unrelaxed systems and ongoing mergers where substructure and double centers can bias the results of the fitting procedure towards lower concentrations. We can test directly for the effects of these various factors by applying the averaging procedure of Cole & Lacey to halos identified in our own P 3M cosmological simulations (see §2.2.1) and comparing with the results of the individual halo runs. We restrict this comparison to the most massive halos in each run, M ∼> 10M⋆ , since these systems have a large number of particles and comparable numerical resolution to that of Cole & Lacey. The comparison confirms that the central concentration of halos can be significantly underestimated as a result of the factors mentioned above. The magnitude of the effect is sensitive to n and Ω0 ; the concentration c can be underestimated by up to a factor of ∼ 3 for n = 0 and Ω0 = 0.1, but by less than ∼ 1.5 for n = −1 and Ω0 = 1. We conclude that the disagreement between our results and those of Cole & Lacey is likely to be the result of the combined effect of their halo selection and averaging procedures and their poorer numerical resolution. 5. Discussion Our results suggest that equilibrium dark halos formed through dissipationless hierarchical clustering have density profiles with a universal shape which does not depend on their mass, on the power spectrum of initial fluctuations, or on the cosmological parameters Ω0 and Λ. It appears that mergers and collisions act during halo formation as a “relaxation” mechanism to produce an equilibrium which is largely independent of initial conditions. This mechanism must operate rapidly since the similarity between profiles extends to the virial radius. These properties are characteristic of the “violent relaxation” process proposed by Lynden-Bell (1967) to explain the regularities observed in the structure of elliptical galaxies, and it is interesting that our universal profile is similar to the Hernquist profile which gives a good description of elliptical galaxy photometry. The two differ significantly only at large radii, perhaps because ellipticals are relatively isolated systems whereas dark halos are not. Syer & White (1996) suggest that a universal profile may be understood as a fixed point for a process of repeated mergers between unequal ob jects. Their analysis of this process predicts a dependence on initial power spectrum – 14 – which seems stronger, however, than that seen in our numerical data. Our simulations suggest that the density profile of an isolated equilibrium halo can be specified quite accurately by giving two parameters; halo mass and halo characteristic density. Furthermore, in any particular hierarchical model these parameters are related in such a way that the characteristic density is proportional to the mean cosmic density at the time when the mass of typical nonlinear ob jects was some fixed small fraction of the halo mass. The characteristic density thus reflects the density of the universe at the collapse time of the ob jects which merge to form the halo core. With this interpretation we are able to fit the mass-density relation for equilibrium halos in all the cosmological models we have considered. In addition, it is possible to calculate the mass-density relation in any other hierarchical model (see Appendix). It is difficult to imagine a simpler situation – halos of all masses in all hierarchical cosmologies look the same, and their characteristic densities are just proportional to the cosmic density at the time they “formed”. Our results extend the radial range over which dark halo structure can reliably be determined to more than two decades. The central regions of our models have densities of order 106 ρcrit , comparable to those in the luminous parts of galaxies and in the central cores of galaxy clusters. As a result a variety of direct observational tests of our predictions are available. In Navarro et al. (1996) we discussed several of these in the context of the standard CDM cosmogony – rotation curves of giant and dwarf galaxies, satellite galaxy dynamics, hot gaseous atmospheres around galaxies and in clusters, strong and weak gravitational lensing – all provide interesting constraints. We will not pursue these issues here, however, because they would take us too far from our primary goal, namely the presentation of a simple and apparently general theoretical result: hierarchical clustering leads to a universal halo density profile just as it leads to universal distributions of halo axial ratios and halo spins; none of these properties depends strongly on power spectrum, on Ω, or on Λ [see Cole & Lacey (1996) and references therein]. Comparison of the predicted halo structure with observation should, of course, provide strong constraints on the parameters which define particular hierarchical cosmogonies, and perhaps on the hierarchical clustering paradigm itself. We expect to come back to these issues in future work. We are grateful for the hospitality of the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the University of California at Santa Barbara, where some of the work presented here was carried out. JFN is also grateful for the hospitality of the Max Planck Institut fur Astrophysik in Garching, where this pro ject was started. In addition he would like to acknowledge useful discussions with Cedric Lacey. Special thanks are due to Shaun Cole for making the data shown in Figure 9 available in electronic form. This work was supported in part by the PPARC and by the NSF under grant No. PHY94-07194 to the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the University of California at Santa Barbara. – 15 – A. Step-by-step calculation of the density profile of a dark matter halo In this Appendix we describe in detail the calculation of the parameters that specify the density profile of a dark halo of mass M . This calculation is applicable to Einstein-de Sitter (Ω0 = 1, Λ = 0), open (Ω0 < 1, Λ = 0), and flat (Ω0 + Λ = 1) universes. We provide approximate fitting formulae that are valid for power-law and CDM initial density fluctuation spectra. A halo of mass M identified at z = z0 can be characterized by its virial radius, h−1M⊙ (cid:19)1/3(cid:18) Ω0 Ω(z0 ) (cid:19)−1/3 r200 = 1.63 × 10−2(cid:18) M or by its circular velocity, (1 + z0 )−1 h−1kpc, (A1) r200 (cid:19)1/2 Ω(z0 ) (cid:19)1/2 = (cid:18) r200 V200 = (cid:18) GM h−1kpc (cid:19) (cid:18) Ω0 The density profile of this system is fully specified by its characteristic density δc and is given by (see eq.1) (1 + z0 )3/2 km/s. (A2) (A3) 3H 2 0 8πG ρ(r) = (1 + z0 )3 Ω0 Ω(z0 ) δc cx(1 + cx)2 , where x = r/r200 and c is the concentration parameter, a function of δc given in eq. 2. The corresponding circular velocity profile, Vc (r), is given by V200 (cid:19)2 (cid:18) Vc (r) using the concentration c as a parameter. ln(1 + cx) − (cx)/(1 + cx) ln(1 + c) − c/(1 + c) 1 x = , (A4) The characteristic density is determined by the collapse redshift zcoll , which is given by (see eq. 4) = = 1 + δcrit(zcoll ) δcrit (z0 ) δ0 crit(Ω(zcoll ), Λ) δ0 crit (Ω(z0 ), Λ) D(z0 , Ω0 , Λ) D(zcoll , Ω0 , Λ) 0.477 δcrit(z0 ) q2(∆2 0 (f M ) − ∆2 0 (M )) Here D(z , Ω0 , Λ) is an Ω-dependent linear growth factor that can be written as D(z , Ω0 , Λ) =   where we have used the following auxiliary definitions, 1/(1 + z ) F1 (w)/F1 (w0 ) F2 (y)F3 (y)/F2 (y0 )F3 (y0 ) if Ω0 = 1 and Λ = 0, if Ω0 < 1 and Λ = 0, if Ω0 + Λ = 1, w0 = 1 Ω0 − 1, w = w0 1 + z , (A5) (A6) (A7) (A8) – 16 – 3 u + F1 (u) = 1 + ln [(1 + u)1/2 − u1/2 ], 3(1 + u)1/2 u3/2 y0 = (2w0 )1/3 , y0 1 + z (u3 + 2)1/2 u3/2 u′3 + 2 (cid:19)3/2 F3 (u) = Z u 0 (cid:18) u′ A good numerical approximation to the Ω-dependence of the critical threshold for spherical collapse is given by F2 (u) = du′ . and y = , , (A13) (A9) (A10) (A11) (A12) 0.15 (12π)2/3 0.15 (12π)2/3 Ω0.0185 0.15 (12π)2/3 Ω0.0055 if Ω = 1 and Λ = 0, if Ω0 < 1 and Λ = 0, if Ω0 + Λ = 1, crit (Ω, Λ) =  δ0  which can be used to compute δcrit (z0 ) = δ0 crit(Ω(z0 ))/D(z0 , Ω0 , Λ). Finally, eq. A5 requires ∆2 0 (M ), the variance of the power spectrum on mass scale M , extrapolated linearly to z = 0. In the case of a power-law spectrum of initial density fluctuations, P (k) ∝ kn , this is simply M⋆ (z = 0) (cid:19)−(n+3)/6 crit(cid:18) M 0 (M ) = δ0 ∆2 where we have normalized the spectrum by M⋆ (z = 0), the present nonlinear mass. A CDM spectrum is usually normalized by σ8 , the rms mass fluctuations within a sphere of radius 8h−1 Mpc, and its variance can be approximated by, , (A14) (A15) where we have used the following definitions, ∆0 (M ) = σ8F4 (M8 )/F4 (Mh ), M8 = 6.005 × 1014 (h Ω0 )3 , Mh = (cid:18) M h−1M⊙ (cid:19)h3Ω2 0 and F4 (u) = A1u0.67 [1 + (A2u−0.1 + A3u−0.63 )p ]1/p , with A1 = 8.6594 × 10−12 , A2 = 3.5, A3 = 1.628 × 109 , and p = 0.255. (A16) (A17) (A18) (A19) Eqs. A6-A19 can be used to solve eq. A5 and find the collapse redshift, zcoll , corresponding to a halo of mass M . As noted when discussing Fig. 5, we recommend using f = 0.01 when solving eq. A5, since this value seems to reproduce well the results of all our numerical experiments. – 17 – Once zcoll (M ) has been found, the characteristic density of the halo (expressed in units of the critical density at z = z0 ) can be computed from (see eq.5 and Table 1), 1 + z0 (cid:19)3 δc (M , z0 ) ∼ 3 × 103 Ω(z0 )(cid:18) 1 + zcoll where we have assumed f = 0.01. A FORTRAN subroutine that implements the procedure described here and returns δc (M , z0 ) for all the cosmologies we discuss is available from the authors upon request. (A20) , – 18 – P (k) CDM CDMΛ Ω0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.25 0.25 0.25 Λ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.75 0.75 0.75 n = −1.5 n = −1.0 n = −0.5 n = 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 f 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.01 C (f ) 1.75 × 104 7.44 × 103 3.41 × 103 1.75 × 104 7.44 × 103 3.41 × 103 3.00 × 104 1.08 × 104 3.15 × 103 5.00 × 104 1.38 × 104 2.50 × 103 5.00 × 104 1.38 × 104 2.50 × 103 1.25 × 105 2.81 × 104 2.81 × 103 4.00 × 105 6.66 × 104 4.00 × 103 4.00 × 105 6.66 × 104 4.00 × 103 Table 1: Parameters in eq. 5 used to plot the fits in Figure 5. – 19 – REFERENCES Bertschinger, E. 1985, ApJS, 58, 39. Cole, S.M., & Lacey, C., 1996, MNRAS, in press (astro-ph 9510147). Crone, M., Evrard, A.E., & Richstone, D.O. 1994, ApJ, 434, 402. Dubinski, J. & Carlberg, R. 1991, ApJ, 378, 496. Efstathiou, G.P., Davis, M., Frenk, C.S., & White, S.D.M. 1985, ApJS, 57, 241. Efstathiou, G.P., Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M., & Davis, M. 1988, MNRAS, 235, 715. Fillmore, J.A., & Goldreich, P. 1984, ApJ, 281, 1. Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M., Efstathiou, G.P., and Davis, M. 1985, Nature, 317, 595. Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M., Davis, M., and Efstathiou, G.P. 1988, ApJ, 327, 507. Gunn, J., & Gott, J.R. 1972, ApJ, 176,1. Hernquist, L. 1990, ApJ, 356, 359. Hoffman, Y. 1988, ApJ, 328, 489. Hoffman, Y., & Shaham, J. 1985, ApJ, 297, 16. Lacey, C.G., & Cole, S.M. 1993, MNRAS, 262, 627. Lynden-Bell, D., 1967, MNRAS, 136, 101. Navarro, J.F., & White, S.D.M. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 271. Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., & White, S.D.M. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 720. Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., & White, S.D.M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563. Quinn, P.J., Salmon, J.K., & Zurek, W.H. 1986, Nature, 322, 329. Syer, D., & White, S.D.M. 1996, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph 9611065). Tormen, G., Bouchet, F., & White, S.D.M., 1996, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph 9603132). Warren, M.S., Quinn, P.J., Salmon, J.K., & Zurek, W.H. 1992, ApJ, 399, 405. West, M.J., Dekel, A., & Oemler, A., 1987, ApJ, 316, 1. White, S.D.M. 1996, in Les Houches Session LX: Cosmology and Large-scale Structure, ed. Schaeffer, R. Silk, J., Spiro, M., Zinn-Justin, J., North Holland, p. 349. Zurek, W.H., Quinn, P.J., & Salmon, J.K. 1988, ApJ, 330, 519. – 20 – This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. – 21 – Fig. 1.— Particle plots illustrating the time evolution of halos of different mass in an Ω0 = 1, n = −1 cosmology. Box sizes of each column are chosen so as to include approximately the same number of particles. At z0 = 0 the box size corresponds to about 6 × r200 . Time runs from top to bottom. Each snapshot is chosen so that M⋆ increases by a factor of 4 between each row. Low mass halos assemble earlier than their more massive counterparts. This is true for every cosmological scenario in our series. – 22 – Fig. 2.— Density profiles of one of the most and one of the least massive halos in each series. In each panel the low-mass system is represented by the leftmost curve. In the SCDM and CDMΛ models radii are given in kpc (scale at the top) and densities are in units of 1010M⊙/kpc3 . In all other panels units are arbitrary. The density parameter, Ω0 , and the value of the spectral index, n is given in each panel. Solid lines are fits to the density profiles using eq. (1). The arrows indicate the value of the gravitational softening. The virial radius of each system is in all cases two orders of magnitude larger than the gravitational softening. – 23 – Fig. 3.— The fits to the density profiles of Figure 2, scaled to the virial radius, r200 , of each system and to the critical density of the universe at z = 0. Solid and dashed lines correspond to the low- and high-mass systems, respectively. Note that low-mass systems are denser than high-mass systems near the center, indicating that the characteristic density of a halo increases as the halo mass decreases. – 24 – Fig. 4.— The circular velocity profiles of the halos shown in Figure 2. Radii are in units of the virial radius and circular speeds are normalized to the value at the virial radius. The thin solid line shows the data from the simulations. All curves have the same shape: they rise near the center until they reach a maximum and then decline at the outer edge. Low mass systems have higher maximum circular velocities in these scaled units because of their higher central concentrations. Dashed lines are fits using eq.(3). The dotted lines are the fit to the low-mass halo in each panel using a Hernquist profile. Note that this model fits rather well the inner regions of the halos, but underestimates the circular velocity near the virial radius. – 25 – Fig. 5.— The correlation between the mass of a halo and its characteristic density. Masses are given in units of the nonlinear mass scale M⋆ (see text for a definition). Densities are relative to the critical value. Three curves are shown in each panel for different values of the parameter f (see eq. 5). The fits are normalized to intersect at M200 = M∗ in the case Ω = 1. This normalization is then used for the low-density models (Ω0 < 1). Note that for f = 0.01 this procedure results in good fits to the results of the simulations in all cases. – 26 – Fig. 6.— As Figure 5, but for the concentration parameter c. – 27 – Fig. 7.— The mass dependence of the maximum circular velocity of a halo. Velocity units are arbitrary in the power-law panels and km s−1 in the CDM models (scale at top). Mass is in units of 1010M⊙ for CDM halos and in units of M⋆ in the other panels. Power law fits of the form M ∝ V α max are shown. The value of α and the rms scatter in the mass about the fit are indicated in each panel. Note that the M -Vmax dependence steepens for larger values of the spectral index n. The effect of the cosmological parameters on α seems to be rather small. – 28 – Fig. 8.— The characteristic density of all halos in our series as a function of the redshift at which half of the final mass is in collapsed progenitors more massive than 10% of the final mass. Solid circles correspond to all our runs with Ω0 = 1, open circles to our runs with Ω0 = 0.1 and Λ = 0, and starred symbols to the CDMΛ runs (Ω0 = 0.25, Λ = 0.75). The solid line shows the “natural” scaling, δc ∝ Ω0 (1 + z )3 expected if the characteristic density of a halo is directly proportional to the mean matter density of the universe at the time of collapse. – 29 – Fig. 9.— A summary of the mass dependence of δc and c in our different cosmological models. Mass is given in units of the nonlinear mass scale M⋆ . Curves are labeled in the upper plots and the same line types are used in the bottom plots. The symbols in the lower-right panel show the correlation between c and mass found by Cole & Lacey (1996), with open squares for n = −1, Ω0 = 1 and solid squares for n = 0, Ω0 = 1. These results should be compared to the lower dashed and lower dot-dashed curves in the same panel, respectively. Because of their poorer numerical resolution, Cole & Lacey’s halos are significantly less concentrated than the ones in our study. – 30 – Fig. 10.— The δc -deviation from the fits shown in Figure 5 (for f = 0.01) plotted versus the deviation from the mean relation between the collapse redshift, 1 + zcoll (Figure 8), and the mass of a system. Note that systems assembled earlier (later) than the average tend to have characteristic densities above (below) the mean. The correlation between the δc and 1 + zcoll residuals follows the “natural” scaling, ∆ log δc = 3∆ log(1 + zcoll ), as shown by the solid line. Only the results corresponding to Ω0 = 1 are shown. – 31 – Fig. 11.— The δc -residuals in Figure 5 relative to the solid curve fit (f = 0.01) plotted versus the residuals in the M200 –λ correlation. This figure shows that the scatter in δc at a given mass cannot be attributed to the effects of rotation. All halos with Ω0 = 1 are included in this plot. – 32 – Fig. 12.— Circular velocity profiles of M⋆ halos formed in simulations with different power spectra in an Einstein-de Sitter universe. The curves were computed using eq. 3 and the values of the concentration c obtained from the fits in Figure 9. Radii are in units of the virial radius and circular speeds in units of the circular velocity at the virial radius. Note that, because of the use of linear units, the fact that all curves have the same shape (eq. 3) is not immediately apparent. – 33 – Fig. 13.— A comparison between our density profiles and the power-law fits of Crone et al. (1994). The region fitted by these authors, corresponding to densities between 100 and 3000, is shown by the dotted lines. Over this region our results (solid lines) and the power-law parameterization adopted by Crone et al. (dashed lines) are consistent. The profiles shown by the solid curves correspond to M = 6M∗ (n = −1.5), M = 4M∗ (n = −1), M = 2M∗ (n = −0.5), and M = M∗ (n = 0), as discussed in the text.
astro-ph/0501138	1	0501	2005-01-08T02:09:18	The IMF Long Ago and Far Away: Faint Stars in the Ursa Minor dSph Galaxy	[ "astro-ph" ]	The dwarf spheroidal galaxy in Ursa Minor is apparently dark-matter dominated, and is of very low surface brightness, with total luminosity only equal to that of a globular cluster. Indeed its dominant stellar population is old and metal-poor, very similar to that of a classical halo globular cluster in the Milky Way Galaxy. However, the environment in which its stars formed was clearly different from that in the globular clusters in the Milky Way Galaxy -- what was the stellar IMF in this external galaxy a long time ago? The fossil record of long-lived, low-mass stars contains the luminosity function, derivable from simple star counts. This is presented here. The mass function requires a robust mass-luminosity relation, and we describe the initial results to determine this, from our survey for eclipsing low-mass binaries in old open clusters. The massive star IMF at early times is constrained by elemental abundances in low-mass stars, and we discuss the available data. All data are consistent with an invariant IMF, most probably of Salpeter slope at the massive end, with a turnover at lower masses.	astro-ph	astro-ph	THE IMF LONG AGO AND FAR AWAY: Faint Stars in the Ursa Minor dSph Galaxy Rosemary F.G. Wyse Johns Hopkins University Department of Physics & Astronomy [email protected] Abstract The dwarf spheroidal galaxy in Ursa Minor is apparently dark-matter dominated, and is of very low surface brightness, with total luminosity only equal to that of a globular cluster. Indeed its dominant stellar population is old and metal-poor, very similar to that of a classical halo globular cluster in the Milky Way Galaxy. However, the environment in which its stars formed was clearly different from that in the globular clusters in the Milky Way Galaxy -- what was the stellar IMF in this external galaxy a long time ago? The fossil record of long-lived, low- mass stars contains the luminosity function, derivable from simple star counts. This is presented here. The mass function requires a robust mass-luminosity relation, and we describe the initial results to deter- mine this, from our survey for eclipsing low-mass binaries in old open clusters. The massive star IMF at early times is constrained by elemen- tal abundances in low-mass stars, and we discuss the available data. All data are consistent with an invariant IMF, most probably of Salpeter slope at the massive end, with a turnover at lower masses. Introduction The stellar IMF at high redshift is of great importance for a wide range of astrophysical problems, such as the ionization and enrichment of the intergalactic medium, the extragalactic background light, the visibility of galaxies and the rate at which baryons are locked-up into stars and stellar remnants. There are two complementary approaches to the de- termination of the IMF long ago and far away: one is to observe directly high redshift objects, and attempt inferences on the stellar IMF from the integrated spectrum and photometry, while the second approach anal- yses the fossil record in old stars at low redshift. The characterization of the stellar IMF in external galaxies, compared to that in the Milky 1 2 Way, is a crucial step in deciphering the important physical processes that determine the distribution of stellar masses under a range of differ- ent physical conditions. The low mass stellar IMF at the high redshifts at which these stars formed is directly accessible through star counts, plus a mass-luminosity relation. The high mass IMF at these high red- shifts is constrained by the chemical signatures in the low mass stars that were enriched by the supernovae from the high mass stars. I will discuss both ends of the IMF at high redshift, in an external galaxy. 1. Extremely Old Stars Simulations of galaxy formation within the framework of the 'concor- dance' (Λ)CDM cosmology agree that the first stars form within struc- tures that are less massive than a typical L∗ galaxy today (e.g. Kauff- mann, White & Guiderdoni 1993; Cole et al. 2000). Large galaxies form hierarchically, through the merging and assimilation of such smaller sys- tems. Satellite galaxies of the Milky Way are survivors of this merging (e.g. Bullock, Kravtsov & Weinberg 2000). The stars that formed at early times are found, at the present day, throughout large galaxies, and also in satellite galaxies. Environments with little subsequent star for- mation are the best places to find and study old stars -- the stellar halo of the Milky Way, and a few of the dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies. 1.1 The Ursa Minor Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy The dwarf spheroidal galaxy in Ursa Minor (UMi dSph), like all mem- bers of its morphological class (Gallagher & Wyse 1994), has extremely low surface brightness, with a central value of only ∼ 25.5 V mag/sq. arc- sec, or ∼ 2.5 L⊙/pc−2. The total luminosity is in the range 2 − 4 × 105 LV,⊙ (Kleyna et al. 1998; Palma et al. 2003), equal to that of a lu- minous Galactic globular cluster. Again similar to a globular cluster, the Ursa Minor dSph contains little or no gas and has apparently not formed a significant number of stars for ∼ 12 Gyr (e.g. Hernandez et al. 2000; Carrera et al. 2002), or since a redshift z > ∼ 2. The metallicity distribution of the stars is narrow, with a mean of [Fe/H] ∼ −1.9 dex and a dispersion of ∼ 0.1 dex (e.g. Bellazzini et al. 2002). The stellar line-of-sight velocity dispersion is ∼ 10 km/s (e.g. Wilkinson et al. 2004), sufficiently large that, unlike globular clusters, equilibrium models have > ∼ 50 (M/L)V,⊙, perhaps as high as a large mass-to-light ratio, (M/L)V ∼ 108 M⊙ (Wilkinson et several hundred in solar units if the mass is > al. 2004), indicating a non-baryonic dark halo. Non-equilibrium models are rather contrived and themselves fail to explain the data (e.g. Wilkin- son et al. 2004). Models of the evolution of dwarf spheroidals are by no The IMF Long Ago 3 means well developed, but very likely the stars formed in an environ- ment rather different than that of globular cluster stars, or of current star-forming regions in the disk of the Milky Way. The distance of the Ursa Minor dSph is only ∼ 70 kpc, close enough that a determination of the luminosity function of low-mass main se- quence stars through star counts is feasible, particularly using the Hub- ble Space Telescope. The (unusually) simple stellar population of this dwarf spheroidal -- essentially of single age, single metallicity -- makes the derivation of the luminosity function from star counts a robust pro- cedure. This determines the low-mass stellar IMF at redshifts of > ∼ 2. High-resolution spectroscopy of the luminous evolved stars is also possi- ble, yielding elemental abundances which constrain the high-mass stellar IMF that enriched the low-mass stars we observe. 2. The Faint Stellar Luminosity Function and Mass Function at Redshift >  ∼ The (very) dominant stellar population in the UMi dSph is very simi- lar to that of a classical Galactic halo globular cluster. The most robust constraint on the low-mass stellar IMF is then obtained by a direct com- parison between the faint stellar luminosity functions of the UMi dSph and of representative globular clusters of the same age and metallicity, such as M15 and M92, observed in the same bandpasses, same telescope and detector. With the same stellar populations, this is a comparison between mass functions, and differences may be ascribed to variations in the low-mass IMF. We therefore obtained deep images with the Hubble Space Telescope in a field close to the center of the UMi dSph, using STIS as the primary instrument (optical Long Pass filter), with WFPC2 (V606 and I814 filters) and NICMOS (NIC2/H-band) in parallel. The WFPC2 filters matched those of extant data for M15 and M92; we obtained our own STIS/LP and NIC2/H-band data for M15. Similarly exposed data for an 'off' field, at 2 -- 3 tidal radii from the centre of UMi dSph, were also acquired. The detailed paper presenting the results from the full dataset is Wyse et al. (2002); preliminary results from a partial WFPC2 dataset were presented in Feltzing, Wyse & Gilmore (1999). The images are not crowded and standard photometric techniques were used to derive the luminosity functions. For the WFPC2 data, the luminosity functions were based only upon stars (unresolved ob- jects) that lie close to the well-defined UMi dSph main sequence locus in the colour-magnitude diagram (CMD; see Figure 1). The 'off' field CMD confirmed little contamination from Galactic stars. The STIS lu- 4 minosity function was based on one band only, and we employed various approaches to background subtraction. The NICMOS data served only to exclude a hypothetical population of very red stars and will not be discussed further here. The extant WFPC2 data for the globular clusters (Piotto et al. 1997) are from fields at intermediate radii within the clus- ters, where effects of dynamical evolution on the mass function should be minimal. Figure 1 (2002). From Wyse et al. Colour- magnitude diagram for all UMi dSph stars from the three wide-field cameras on WFPC2. The full curves delineate the se- lection criteria for stars to be included in the luminosity function. The error-bars in each magnitude bin are shown at the right. The well-defined narrow main sequence is the main feature. The few blue stars close to the turn-off are probably blue stragglers, rather than younger stars. The distribu- tion of stars across the main sequence is asymmetric, to the red, and is consistent with a normal population of binary stars. 2.1 Comparisons with Globular Clusters The comparisons with the WFPC2 colour-magnitude based V-band and I-band luminosity functions are shown in Figure 2. We adopted 0.5 mag bins to have reasonable numbers in each bin, and to mini- mize effects of e.g. reddening and distance moduli uncertainties. The 50% completeness limits for the UMi dSph data are equivalent to ab- solute magnitudes of M606 = +9.1 and M814 = +8.1, which using the Baraffe et al. (1997) models both correspond to masses of M ∼ 0.3 M⊙. The STIS/LP data provide an independent check, by both a direct LP- luminosity function comparison between M15 and UMi dSph, and a de- rived STIS-based I-band luminosity function. All show that the globular cluster stars and the UMi stars have indistinguishable faint luminosity functions, down to an equivalent mass limit of ∼ 0.3 M⊙ (see Wyse et al. 2002 for details). We employed various statistical tests to quantify the agreement of the various datasets -- e.g. STIS-derived I-band vs. WFPC2 I-band etc: ♥ Linear, least-square fits to the (log) counts as a function of apparent magnitude, using various ranges of magnitude and differing bin choices, consistently found agreement to better than 2σ. The IMF Long Ago 5 Based on figures in Wyse et al. (2002). Comparisons between the Figure 2. completeness-corrected Ursa Minor luminosity functions (histograms; 50% complete- ness indicated by the vertical dotted line) in the V-band (left panel) and the I-band (right panel) and the same for M92 (filled circles) and M15 (open triangles) (both taken from Piotto et al. 1997, renormalized and shifted to the same distance as the Ursa Minor dSph). The luminosity functions for the globular clusters and the dwarf spheroidal galaxy are indistinguishable. ♥ Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests on the unbinned data for a variety of magnitude ranges; the results depend on systematics such as the relative distance moduli, but again there is general agreement to better than 5% significance level. ♥ χ−square tests were carried out on the binned data, using a variety of bin centers (maintaining 0.5 mag bin widths) and magnitude ranges and again agreement to better than 5% significance level. The main result is that the underlying mass functions of low-mass stars in Galactic halo globular clusters and in the external galaxy the UMi dSph are indistinguishable. This is a comparison between two different galaxies, and systems of very different baryonic densities and dark matter content. 3. Low-Mass Stellar Mass Functions Adopting the Baraffe et al. (1997) models, the 50% completeness lim- its for the luminosity functions of the stars in the UMi dSph correspond to ∼ 0.3 M⊙, and the mass function may be fit by a power law, with slope somewhat flatter than the Salpeter (1955) value, over the range we test, of 0.3 < < ∼ 0.8. This is consistent with the solar neigh- bourhood mass function over this mass range, and indeed the universal mass function that appears to be the conclusion of this meeting. ∼ M/M ⊙ However, the light-to-mass transformation is not robustly defined for K/M dwarfs, especially as a function of age and metallicity. Calibration of this is best achieved by analysis of low-mass stars in detached eclipsing binary systems, and we have recently undertaken a photometric survey 6 of open clusters to identify candidate low-mass binary systems to be followed up with spectroscopy for radial velocity curves; this forms the PhD thesis of Leslie Hebb at Johns Hopkins University. Our sample consists of six open clusters of known age and metallicity (from the brighter turn-off stars), old enough to have low-mass stars on ∼ 2 × 108 yr, with the oldest being ∼ 4 Gyr. We the main sequence, age > used both the Wide Field Camera on the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope and the Mosaic Camera on the Kitt Peak 4m telescope, each of which provide a field of view of ∼ 35′ × 35′. The observing strategy we adopted was designed to enable the detection of a 0.05 mag amplitude eclipse in a target 0.3 M⊙ star, monitored on timescales of fraction of an hour, hours and days. The low probability of eclipse means that populous clusters must be observed for many days. We expect our survey to find 3 -- 5 low-mass eclipsing systems. The details of the survey are presented in Hebb, Wyse & Gilmore (2004). The phase-folded lightcurve for a candidate M-dwarf eclipsing system in Figure 3. the open cluster M35, with a period of just over 1 day. The crosses show all differential photometry measurements for this object collected in January 2002, January 2003 and February 2003. The solid line is a simple sine-wave fit to the measurements taken during the primary eclipse. The phase of the secondary eclipse is marked by the same sine function fit to the primary eclipse, but with half the amplitude. The imaging data has all been acquired, differential photometry ob- tained and we are now analyzing the derived light curves. An example of the light curve of a candidate eclipsing low-mass system is shown in Figure 3; the candidate was identified by applying a box-fitting algo- rithm to the photometric time series. Our photometry, plus infrared data from 2MASS, is consistent with this being an M-dwarf system. We have applied for follow-up spectroscopic data, together with higher time- sampling photometric data, for this system and for our other candidates. 4. High-Mass Stellar Mass Functions The high-mass stellar mass function long ago can be constrained by the elemental abundances in the long-lived low-mass stars that formed The IMF Long Ago 7 from gas that was enriched by the Type II supernovae from the massive stars of a previous generation (see e.g. review of Wyse 1998). Interpreta- tion of the pattern of elemental abundances is easiest for low-mass stars that formed early in a star-formation event, and were enriched by only massive stars. Most of the dwarf spheroidal companions to the Milky Way have had extended star formation, and so are expected to show evidence in the elemental abundances for the incorporation of iron from long-lived Type Ia supernovae. The Ursa Minor dSph is the best candi- date for having had a sufficiently short duration of star formation that a significant fraction of its low-mass stars formed prior to the onset of Type Ia supernovae in sufficient numbers to be noticed in the chemical elemental abundances; this timescale is uncertain, but likely to be of the order of 1 -- 2 Gyr. The elemental mix produced by a generation of massive stars depends on the massive-star mass function, because the yields of a given Type II supernova depends on its mass. In particular, the α-element yields (nuclei formed by successive addition of a helium nucleus) vary more strongly with progenitor mass than does the iron yield (e.g. Figure 1 of Gibson 1998). There appears to have been surprisingly good mixing at early times, at least in the stellar halo of the Milky Way (see the remarkably low scatter in the ratio of [α/Fe] at [Fe/H] < ∼ − 2.5 in the sample analysed by Cayrel et al. 2004), so that a well-defined value of [α/Fe] is produced by a generation of massive stars of given IMF. This is seen as the 'Type II plateau' in [α/Fe] for metal-poor Galactic stars. The available elemental abundance data for a handful of individual stars in the UMi dSph are consistent with the same value for the Type II plateau as seen in stars of the Milky Way (Shetrone et al. 2001), with some downturn for more metal-rich stars, as expected if there is an age spread of 1 -- 2 Gyr and an age-metallicity relationship. The simplest interpretation is that the high mass IMF was the same in the UMi dSph as in the Galaxy -- and that IMF is a power-law with Salpeter (1955) slope. Most of the stars in the other dwarf spheroidals have low values of [α/Fe], consistent with a standard -- Salpeter -- IMF for massive stars and an extended star formation history, as implied by their colour-magnitude diagram (see e.g. Venn et al. 2004). 5. Conclusions The fossil record in low-mass stars at the present time allows the derivation of the stellar IMF at high redshift. The low-mass luminosity function is accessible through star counts, most robustly in a system 8 with a simple stellar population. We have found that the low-mass IMF is invariant between globular clusters in the halo of the Milky Way and an external galaxy, the dwarf spheroidal in Ursa Minor. The underlying mass function is apparently the same as that for present-day star forma- tion in the local disk of the Milky Way. The low-mass IMF is remarkably invariant, over a broad range of metallicities, age, star-formation rate, baryonic density, dark matter content -- indeed most of the parameters that a priori one might have expected to be important in determining the masses of stars. The high-mass IMF is also apparently independent of these parameters. This invariance is particularly surprising if the Jeans mass plays an important role. Acknowledgments I thank my colleagues and collaborators Sofia Feltzing, Jay Gallagher, Gerry Gilmore, Leslie Hebb, Mark Houdashelt and Tammy Smecker- Hane for their contributions to the results described here. I would also like to thank the tireless organizers of this stimulating meeting for invit- ing me. References Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F. & Hauschildt, P. 1997, A&A, 327, 1054 Bullock, J., Kravtsov, A. & Weinberg, D. 2000, ApJ, 539, 517 Bellazzini, M., Ferraro, F., Origlia, L., Pancino, E. et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 3222 Carrera, R., Aparicio, A., Martinez-Delgado, D. & Alonso-Garcia, J. 2002, AJ, 123, 3199 Cayrel, R. et al. 2004, A&A, 416, 1117 Cole, S., Lacey, C., Baugh, C. & Frenk, C. 2000, MNRAS, 319, 168 Feltzing, S., Wyse, R.F.G. & Gilmore, G. 1999, ApJL, 516, 17 Gallagher, J.S. & Wyse, R.F.G. 1994, PASP, 106, 1225 Gibson, B. 1998, ApJ, 501, 675 Hebb, L., Wyse, R.F.G. & Gilmore, G. 2004, AJ, December issue (astro-ph/0409289) Hernandez, X., Gilmore, G. & Valls-Gabaud, D. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 831 Kauffmann, G., White, S.D.M. & Guiderdoni, B. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201 Kleyna, J., Geller, M., Kenyon, S., Kurtz, M. & Thorstensen, J. 1998, AJ, 115, 2359 Palma, C., Majewski, S., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1352 Piotto, G., Cool, A. & King, I. 1997, AJ, 113, 1345 Salpeter, E.E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 Shetrone, M., Cot´e, P. & Sargent, W. 2001, ApJ, 548, 592 Venn, K. et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1177 Wilkinson, M., Kleyna, J., Evans, W., Gilmore, G., Irwin, M. & Grebel, E. 2004, ApJL, 611, 21 Wyse, R.F.G. 1998, in The Stellar IMF, ASP Conf series 142, eds Gilmore & Howell, p89 Wyse, R.F.G. et al. 2002, New Ast, 7, 395
astro-ph/0404287	1	0404	2004-04-14T20:15:36	The Low Quiescent X-Ray Luminosity of the Neutron Star Transient XTE J2123-058	[ "astro-ph" ]	We report on the first X-ray observations of the neutron star soft X-ray transient (SXT) XTE J2123-058 in quiescence, made by Chandra and BeppoSAX, as well as contemporaneous optical observations. In 2002, the Chandra spectrum of XTE J2123-058 is consistent with a power-law model, or the combination of a blackbody plus a power-law, but it is not well-described by a pure blackbody. Using the interstellar column density, the power-law fit gives photon index of 3.1 (+0.7,-0.6) and indicates a 0.3-8 keV unabsorbed luminosity of 9(+4,-3)E31 (d/8.5 kpc)^2 ergs/s (90% confidence errors). Fits with models consisting of thermal plus power-law components indicate that the upper limit on the temperature of a 1.4 solar mass, 10 km radius neutron star with a hydrogen atmosphere is kT_eff < 66 eV, and the upper limit on the bolometric luminosity is L_infinity < 1.4E32 ergs/s, assuming d = 8.5 kpc. Of the neutron star SXTs that exhibit short (< 1 year) outbursts, including Aql X-1, 4U 1608-522, Cen X-4, and SAX J1810.8-2609, the lowest temperatures and luminosities are found for XTE J2123-058 and SAX J1810.8-2609. From the BeppoSAX observation of XTE J2123-058 in 2000, we obtained an upper limit on the 1-10 keV unabsorbed luminosity of 9E32 ergs/s. Although this upper limit allows that the X-ray luminosity may have decreased between 2000 and 2002, that possibility is not supported by our contemporaneous R-band observations, which indicate that the optical flux increased significantly. Motivated by the theory of deep crustal heating by Brown and co-workers, we characterize the outburst histories of the five SXTs. The low quiescent luminosity for XTE J2123-058 is consistent with the theory of deep crustal heating without requiring enhanced neutron star cooling if the outburst recurrence time is >~ 70 years.	astro-ph	astro-ph	DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 18, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 7/15/03 THE LOW QUIESCENT X-RAY LUMINOSITY OF THE NEUTRON STAR TRANSIENT XTE J2123 -- 058 JOHN A. TOMSICK1, DAWN M. GELINO1, JULES P. HALPERN2, PHILIP KAARET3 Draft version November 18, 2018 ABSTRACT We report on the first X-ray observations of the neutron star soft X-ray transient (SXT) XTE J2123 -- 058 in quiescence, made by the Chandra X-ray Observatory and BeppoSAX, as well as contemporaneous optical observations. In 2002, the Chandra spectrum of XTE J2123 -- 058 is consistent with a power-law model, or the combination of a blackbody plus a power-law, but it is not well-described by a pure blackbody. Using the interstellar value of NH, the power-law fit gives Γ = 3.1+0.7 - 0.6 and indicates a 0.3 -- 8 keV unabsorbed luminosity of (9+4- 3) × 1031 (d/8.5 kpc)2 ergs s- 1 (90% confidence errors). Fits with models consisting of thermal plus power-law components indicate that the upper limit on the temperature of a 1.4 M⊙, 10 km radius neutron star with a hydrogen atmosphere is kTeff < 66 eV, and the upper limit on the unabsorbed, bolometric luminosity is L∞ < 1.4 ×1032 ergs s- 1, assuming d = 8.5 kpc. Of the neutron star SXTs that exhibit short (<1 year) outbursts, including Aql X-1, 4U 1608 -- 522, Cen X-4, and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609, the lowest temperatures and luminosities are found for XTE J2123 -- 058 and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609. From the BeppoSAX observation of XTE J2123 -- 058 in 2000, we obtained an upper limit on the 1 -- 10 keV unabsorbed luminosity of 9 × 1032 ergs s- 1. Although this upper limit allows that the X-ray luminosity may have decreased between 2000 and 2002, that possibility is not supported by our contemporaneous R-band observations, which indicate that the optical flux increased significantly. Motivated by the theory of deep crustal heating by Brown and co-workers, we characterize the outburst histories of the five SXTs. The low quiescent luminosity for XTE J2123 -- 058 is consistent with the theory of deep crustal heating without requiring enhanced neutron star cooling if the outburst recurrence time is ∼> 70 years. Subject headings: accretion, accretion disks -- stars: individual (XTE J2123 -- 058, SAX J1810.8 -- 2609) -- stars: neutron -- X-rays: stars 1. INTRODUCTION Accreting neutron stars can be found in high-mass (HMXB) or low-mass (LMXB) X-ray binary systems. The majority of HMXBs have transient X-ray emission. Their outburst spec- tra are relatively hard and X-ray pulsations from these highly magnetized (B ∼ 1012 G) neutron stars are typically detected. A wide variety of X-ray behaviors are seen for neutron star LMXBs, but, in general, the lack of X-ray pulsations from most (but not all) of these systems, and the emission of type I X-ray bursts from some, suggest that they harbor neutron stars with relatively low magnetic field strengths (B ∼ 108- 9 G). During ≈ 33 years of X-ray observations, some sources (e.g., Sco X-1, Cyg X-2) have maintained luminosities approaching the Eddington limit of ≈ 1038 ergs s- 1, while others are able to maintain persistent luminosities several orders of magni- tude lower (Wilson et al. 2003). In addition, there is a class of transient neutron star LMXBs for which the luminosity varies from a substantial fraction of Eddington to quiescent levels typically near 1032- 33 ergs s- 1. In outburst, these systems have relatively soft spectra compared to the HMXBs, and are com- monly grouped with black hole transients as soft X-ray tran- sients (SXTs). In quiescence, most neutron star SXTs exhibit X-ray en- ergy spectra with a component that is typically fitted well by a blackbody, suggesting that the origin of this compo- 1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, Code 0424, University jtom- of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) 2 Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027 3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cam- bridge, MA, 02138, USA nent is thermal emission from the surface of a cooling neu- tron star. Although a pure blackbody often provides a good fit to the spectrum, unphysical neutron star radii near 1 km are inferred unless an atmosphere is modeled (Rutledge et al. 1999). In addition to the thermal component, the energy spectra often contain a second component that has a power- law shape. The brightest and best studied systems in this class, Cen X-4 and Aql X-1, usually display both compo- nents (Rutledge et al. 2001, 2002a; Campana & Stella 2003; Campana et al. 2004). However, other systems may be dom- inated by the thermal component, such as MXB 1659 -- 29 (Wijnands et al. 2003b) and sources X-5 and X-7 in the glob- ular cluster 47 Tucanae (Heinke et al. 2003), or by the power- law component, such as SAX J1808.4 -- 3658 (Campana et al. 2002) and EXO 1745 -- 248 (Wijnands et al. 2003a). Although theories for the thermal component, such as the deep crustal heating model of Brown, Bildsten & Rutledge (1998), are rel- atively well-developed and are being tested with observa- tions, the origin of the power-law component is not under- stood beyond suggestions that it may be related to accretion onto the neutron star magnetosphere (Campana et al. 1998) or a putative pulsar wind colliding with infalling matter from the companion star (Tavani 1991). In addition to our lack of understanding of the power-law component, questions re- main about the mass accretion rate in quiescence, the ori- gin of rapid (100 -- 10,000 s) variability (Rutledge et al. 2002a; Campana et al. 2004), and the origin of variability in the ther- mal component on longer time scales (Rutledge et al. 2002a). Another important question is if quiescent observational prop- erties correlate with other known differences between neutron star SXTs, such as whether they are millisecond X-ray pulsars (during outbursts) or not, whether the systems are in the field 2 J.A. Tomsick et al. or in globular clusters, and whether their X-ray outbursts are long (years to decades) or short (weeks to months). indicating that Here, we report on X-ray and optical observations of the field neutron star SXT XTE J2123 -- 058 taken during qui- escence. XTE J2123 -- 058 had its only detected X-ray out- burst in 1998 June-August (Levine, Swank & Smith 1998; Tomsick et al. 1999), and we focus on observations made with Chandra, BeppoSAX, and optical telescopes 2 -- 4 years after the outburst. During the outburst, the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) detected type I X-ray bursts and a pair of kHz quasi-periodic oscillations (Homan et al. 1999; Tomsick et al. 1999), the system contains a rapidly rotating neutron star. However, coherent X-ray pulsations were not found. The 6 hr binary orbital pe- riod and the fact that the binary inclination of the sys- tem is relatively high were established from optical mod- ulation and the presence of partial eclipses in the opti- cal light curve (Tomsick et al. 1999; Soria, Wu & Galloway 1999; Zurita et al. 2000; Shahbaz et al. 2003). The high Galactic latitude (b = - 36◦) and low extinction have allowed for detailed optical studies of XTE J2123 -- 058 in quiescence even though the source is rather faint at its relatively large distance (8.5 ± 2.5 kpc). The optical observations show that XTE J2123 -- 058 consists of a K7 V star on or close to the main sequence and a neutron star for which mass determi- nations of 1.5 ± 0.3 M⊙ (Tomsick et al. 2001; Casares et al. 2002; Tomsick et al. 2002) and 1.04 -- 1.56 M⊙ (Shahbaz et al. 2003) have been obtained. The focus of this paper is the first X-ray study of XTE J2123 -- 058 in quiescence. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS We observed XTE J2123 -- 058 with Chandra on UT 2002 November 13 (ObsID 2709), using the Advanced CCD Imag- ing Spectrometer (ACIS) with the target placed on one of the back-illuminated ACIS chips (ACIS-S3). For our anal- ysis, we used the "level 2" event list produced by the stan- dard data processing with ASCDS version 6.9.2 using Cal- ibration Data Base (CALDB) version 2.17. Light curves using counts from the full field-of-view do not show any background flares, allowing us to use the data from the full 17,706 s integration. Using the Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations (CIAO) version 3.0 software routine wavde- tect (Freeman et al. 2002), we searched for sources on the S3 chip in the 0.3 -- 8 keV energy band. We detected 22 sources with counts between 5 and 108 per source, using a detec- tion threshold of 10- 6, including a 24 count source at R.A. = 21h23m14s.54, decl. = - 05◦47′53′′.2 (equinox J2000, un- certainty 0′′.6). This position is consistent with the target's optical position (Tomsick et al. 1999), and we conclude that this source is the quiescent X-ray counterpart of XTE J2123 -- 058. We also report on a BeppoSAX observation of the XTE J2123 -- 058 field made on UT 2000 May 12 -- 13. We produced 1 -- 10 keV images using the data from the two Medium En- ergy Concentrator/Spectrometer (MECS) units that were op- erational during the observation (units 2 and 3). We also pro- duced a 0.1 -- 10 keV image using data from the Low Energy Concentrator/Spectrometer (LECS). We obtained a MECS exposure time of 46,340 s and a LECS exposure time of 17,080 s. To search for sources, we convolved each of the three images with a two-dimensional Gaussian with a width (σ) of 5 pixels (40′′) in both directions. Only one source was clearly detected in both of the MECS images at R.A. = 21h22m50s.6, decl. = - 05◦45′09′′ (equinox J2000, uncertainty ∼ 1′), and this source, which we call SAX J2122.8 -- 0575, is also present in the LECS image. It is clear that SAX J2122.8 -- 0575 is not XTE J2123 -- 058 as they are separated by 6′.6. We conclude that XTE J2123 -- 058 was not detected during the BeppoSAX observation, and we derive an upper limit on its X-ray flux below. Finally, we obtained R-band images on three occasions close to the times of the X-ray observations. As shown in Table 1, we observed XTE J2123 -- 058 using the 2.4 m Hiltner telescope of the MDM Observatory on 2000 July 24, about 2 months after the BeppoSAX observation. We also observed XTE J2123 -- 058 with the Shane 3 m telescope of Lick Ob- servatory about 2 months before the Chandra observation and again at MDM about 2 weeks after the Chandra observation. For both MDM runs, we used the same SITe 2048 × 2048 pixel, thinned, back-illuminated CCD with a spatial scale of 0′′.275 per 24 µm pixel, and an R filter that is very close to Harris R. 4 At Lick, we used the Prime Focus Camera, with a SITe 2048 × 2048 pixel, thinned CCD with a spatial scale of 0′′.296 per 24 µm pixel, and a Kron-Cousins R filter. In all, we obtained thirteen 600 -- 700 s exposures (see Table 1), and we reduced the images using standard IRAF 5 routines. For XTE J2123 -- 058, we carried out the photometry with the IRAF package phot and used two calibrated reference stars with R magnitudes of 19.47 and 19.51. In 2002, the con- ditions at Lick were photometric, and we observed Landolt (1992) standards to obtain the calibration. We note that this calibration is about 0.1 magnitudes brighter than the calibra- tion previously obtained using MDM observations from 1998 reported in Tomsick et al. (1999). 3. ENERGY SPECTRUM AND SOURCE LUMINOSITY We used the CIAO software routine psextract to produce the ACIS energy spectrum for XTE J2123 -- 058 and to create the appropriate instrument response matrix for the spectrum. The software used CALDB 2.23 to create the response matrix, and we included a correction for the time-dependence of the ACIS response. The source spectrum included counts from a circular region with a 5 pixel (about 2′′.5) radius, and we es- timated the background level using counts from a source-free annulus around the target position. The source spectrum con- sists of 24 counts, and we estimate a background level of 0.7 counts in the extraction region. We produced a "light curve" of the source in six time bins of ≈ 3000 s. Each bin contains between 2 and 6 counts, which is consistent with a constant flux; however, the low count rate does not allow us to place tight constraints on the possible amplitude of variability. The small number of counts also indicates that χ2 statistics are not appropriate for spectral analysis, as the assumption of a Gaussian probability distribution in each spectral bin is not met. Thus, we carried out our spectral analysis by minimiz- ing the Cash statistic (Cash 1979), which is appropriate in cases where the assumption of a Poisson probability distribu- tion in each spectral bin is valid. We fitted the spectrum using XSPEC 11.2. The spectra of other neutron star SXTs are typically well- described by a blackbody, a power-law, or both components with interstellar absorption. We began by fitting the spec- 4 See http://www.astro.lsa.umich.edu/obs/mdm/technical/filters for the ex- act transmission curve. 5 IRAF (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility) is distributed by the Na- tional Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Asso- ciation of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. XTE J2123 -- 058 in Quiescence a b 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 1 - V e k 1 - s s t n u o C ) 1 - s 2 - m c V e k ( E F E 1 Energy (keV) 10 FIG. 1. -- Chandra/ACIS energy spectrum of XTE J2123 -- 058. Top: folded through the detector response. Bottom: unfolded. In each panel, the solid line is a power-law fit to the data (using Cash statistics as described in the text) with NH fixed at the interstellar value. The power-law photon index is - 0.6, and the unabsorbed 0.3 -- 8 keV luminosity is (9+4- 3) × 1031 ergs s- 1. A 3.1+0.7 blackbody model (dashed line), by itself, does not provide a good description of the spectrum. trum for XTE J2123 -- 058 with an absorbed power-law, and the results are given in Table 2. Once we found the best-fitted parameters by minimizing the Cash statistic, we determined the quality of the fit and the 90% confidence errors on the parameters by producing and fitting 10,000 simulated spec- tra. We used the best-fitted parameters from the fits to the actual data as input to the simulations. Using simulations to determine the parameter errors is necessary only because of the small number of counts in the spectrum. We tested our method by producing spectra with 2 -- 3 times as many counts, and we found that the errors produced by calculating changes in the Cash statistic (the standard technique) match the val- ues we obtain using simulations. In addition to the power-law model, we used simulations to determine the errors on param- eter for all other fits presented in this work. For the power-law model, we obtain NH = (7.0+40.0 - 7.0 ) × 1020 cm- 2 for the column density and Γ = 3.1+2.8 - 0.8 for the photon index. The fit using a blackbody model is significantly worse than the power-law model as indicated by the fact that for 97% of the simulated spectra we obtained a better Cash statistic than the one ob- tained when fitting the actual spectrum (compared to 69% for the power-law model). We refitted the spectrum with the same spectral mod- els but with NH fixed to the interstellar column density. The interstellar NH comes from the AV measurement of Hynes et al. (2001), which gives NH = (6.6 ±2.7) ×1020 cm- 2, and the total Galactic H I value of 5.7 × 1020 cm- 2 from Dickey & Lockman (1990). We adopt a value of 6 × 1020 cm- 2. For the power-law alone, we obtain Γ = 3.1+0.7 - 0.6 and an - 0.4) × 10- 14 ergs cm- 2 s- 1, unabsorbed 0.3 -- 8 keV flux of (1.1+0.5 3 which corresponds to a luminosity of (9+4- 3) × 1031 ergs s- 1 at a distance of 8.5 kpc. The best fitted blackbody temper- ature is 240+60 - 50 eV, but the quality of the blackbody fit is even worse (98.7%) with NH fixed. Figure 1 shows the spectrum (rebinned for clarity, although the Cash fits are performed without rebinning) along with the best fitted power-law and blackbody models with NH fixed. It is clear that the curvature of the blackbody model is too large, underpredicting the ob- served spectrum below 0.7 keV and above 2 keV. This, along with the measurements of the fit quality from the simulations, indicates that the spectrum is well-described by a power-law model or the combination of a blackbody and a power-law model, but it is not well-described by a blackbody alone. Although a power-law alone provides an adequate descrip- tion of the ACIS spectrum, we performed additional fits to obtain limits on the temperature and luminosity of the puta- tive thermal component that is expected to be emitted from the surface of the neutron star. We fitted the spectrum with a model consisting of a power-law component along with ther- mal emission from an atmosphere composed of hydrogen. The latter component was modeled using the "Neutron Star Atmosphere" (NSA) model of Zavlin, Pavlov & Shibanov (1996). We assumed a neutron star mass of 1.4 M⊙, which is consistent with the measured mass, and a radius of 10 km. With these parameters fixed, the remaining free parameters in the NSA model are the temperature (kTeff) and the distance. For XTE J2123 -- 058, there are several arguments that lead to distance estimates in the range 5 -- 15 kpc (Tomsick et al. 1999; Homan et al. 1999; Zurita et al. 2000), but the most reliable estimates come from optical observations of the source in qui- escence. Previous estimates include 8 ± 3 kpc (Zurita et al. 2000), 8.5 ± 2.5 kpc (Tomsick et al. 2001), and 9.6 ± 1.3 kpc (Casares et al. 2002). Here, we adopt a range of 6 -- 11 kpc. We performed the NSA plus power-law fits with the distance fixed to three values spanning this range (6, 8.5, and 11 kpc). As shown in Table 3, the 90% confidence upper limits on kTeff are 57, 66, and 73 eV, respectively, for these three distances. Us- eff(1 - 2GM/Rc2), where R = 10 km and M ing L∞ = 4πR2σT 4 = 1.4 M⊙, upper limits on the unabsorbed luminosity from the NSA component as seen by a distant observer are 8.0 × 1031, 1.4 × 1032 and 2.1 × 1032 ergs s- 1 for distances of 6, 8.5, and 11 kpc, respectively. While these values are bolometric lumi- nosities, it should be noted that we cannot rule out the pos- sibility that there is thermal emission at energies below the Chandra bandpass. Although XTE J2123 -- 058 was not detected by BeppoSAX in 2000 May, we can calculate upper limits on its luminos- ity if we assume that the energy spectrum was similar to that measured by Chandra. To calculate the upper limits, we as- sume the simplest model of an absorbed power-law with a photon index of 3.1 and the interstellar column density. For the MECS (units 2 and 3 combined), we measure a 1 -- 10 keV count rate of 1.684 ks- 1 in a circle of radius 2′ centered on the XTE J2123 -- 058 position. This is not significantly higher than the expected background rate (using a blank-sky pointing) of 1.675 ks- 1. These values imply a 3-σ upper limit on the count rate from XTE J2123 -- 058 of 0.676 ks- 1, which corresponds to an unabsorbed flux < 1.02 × 10- 13 ergs cm- 2 s- 1, and a 1 -- 10 keV luminosity < 9 × 1032 ergs s- 1 for d = 8.5 kpc. For the LECS, the 0.1 -- 1 keV count rate in a 2′ radius circle centered on XTE J2123 -- 058 is 1.230 ks- 1, which is actually somewhat lower than the expected background rate of 1.466 ks- 1. Using the expected background rate, the 3-σ upper limit on the un- absorbed 0.1 -- 1 keV flux is 1.75 × 10- 12 ergs cm- 2 s- 1, corre- 4 sponding to a luminosity < 1.5 × 1034 ergs s- 1 for d = 8.5 kpc. J.A. Tomsick et al. 4. OPTICAL RESULTS Figure 2 shows the R magnitudes for XTE J2123 -- 058 from three exposures taken in 2000 July at MDM, two exposures taken in 2002 September at Lick, and eight exposures taken in 2002 November at MDM. Previously, Shahbaz et al. (2003) reported on extensive R-band photometry of XTE J2123 -- 058 taken between 1999 June and 2000 August. The R-band light curve was relatively stable at that time, showing or- bital ellipsoidal modulations with a peak-to-peak amplitude of about 0.25 magnitudes. The dashed lines in Figure 2 in- dicate the range of the modulation in 1999 -- 2000, which was 21.70 < R < 21.95. While our 2000 May measurements of 21.63 ± 0.07, 21.75 ± 0.08, and 21.57 ± 0.07 are consistent with the brighter end of this range, our later observations indi- cate that XTE J2123 -- 058 brightened between 2000 and 2002. The range of R between 21.41 ± 0.07 and 21.01 ± 0.03 over 25% of the 6 hr binary orbital period during the 2002 Novem- ber run indicates that the source continues to vary, but with a peak level that is at least 0.6 -- 0.7 magnitudes brighter than the peak level of R = 21.7 measured by Shahbaz et al. (2003). As our observations do not cover the full binary orbit, it is not clear whether this change is due to the addition of a con- stant component to the light curve or if the shape of the mod- ulations has changed. Although it would be useful to know the orbital phases corresponding to the 2002 data, the binary ephemeris is too uncertain to extrapolate to 2002 as discussed in Tomsick et al. (2002). In the future, it may be worthwhile to obtain an X-ray observation while measuring the optical or IR light curve for a full 6 hr binary orbit. As we are reporting the first sensitive X-ray observations of XTE J2123 -- 058 in quiescence, comparison can be made with a prior prediction for the quiescent X-ray luminosity of this source that was made by modeling quiescent R-band light curves in 1999 and 2000. Shahbaz et al. (2003) predicted an X-ray luminosity of ∼1033 ergs s- 1, which is only slightly higher than our upper limit from the BeppoSAX observation made in 2000, but an order of magnitude higher than we ob- served with Chandra in 2002. While the X-ray observations would allow for the possibility that the quiescent X-ray lu- minosity decreased significantly between 2000 and 2002, our optical observations made in 2000 and 2002 indicate that the R-band flux actually increased over this time. If the 2000 R- band light curve showed a significant contribution from X- ray heating, it is difficult to see how a drop in X-ray flux could lead to an increase in the optical, thus, it is possible that Shahbaz et al. (2003) over-estimated the contribution from X- ray heating. 5. INTERPRETATION X-ray observations of neutron star SXTs in quiescence provide tests of theoretical models for the thermal com- ponent. According to the theory of deep crustal heating by Brown, Bildsten & Rutledge (1998), the temperature of the neutron star core is maintained by nuclear reactions in the deep crust that occur when the mass accretion rate is high during outburst. As the thermal time scale for the core is ∼10,000 years (Colpi et al. 2001), the level of qui- escent thermal emission is set by the average mass accre- tion rate over this time span according to Lq = 9 × 1032 < M>- 11 ergs s- 1 (see Equation 1 of Rutledge et al. 2002b), assuming 1.45 MeV of heat deposited in the crust per ac- creted nucleon (Haensel & Zdunik 1990). Here < M>- 11 is a 749.880 749.865 749.870 749.875 HJD-2451000 (days) b c 1529.78 1529.74 1529.76 HJD-2451000 (days) e d u t i n g a m R - e d u t i n g a m R - 21.0 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.8 22.0 749.860 21.0 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.8 22.0 1529.72 e d u t i n g a m R - 21.0 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.8 22.0 1603.56 1603.58 1603.60 1603.62 HJD-2451000 (days) 1603.64 (b) 2002 September at Lick Observatory. FIG. 2. -- R-band measurements of XTE J2123 -- 058. (a) 2000 July at MDM Observatory. (c) 2002 Novem- ber at MDM Observatory. The dashed lines delimit the levels measured by Shahbaz et al. (2003) during 1999 -- 2000. An increase in the R-band flux be- tween 2000 and 2002 is apparent. the mass accretion rate averaged over the thermal time scale of the core in units of 10- 11 M⊙ yr- 1, and Lq is the quiescent bolometric luminosity. While the time-averaged mass accre- tion rate is only a predictor of Lq if the neutron star core has reached thermal equilibrium, the lifetimes of LMXB systems are much longer than the thermal time scale of the core, and it is expected that thermal equilibrium has been established for all or nearly all of the LMXBs. While the long thermal time scale for the core precludes appreciable changes in the core temperature during a single SXT outburst, the neutron star crust can be heated significantly for the systems with longer outbursts (years to decades) so that the quiescent emission is determined by the evolution of the physical conditions in the crust (Rutledge et al. 2002b). However, for the systems with shorter outbursts (weeks to months), the properties of the qui- escent thermal emission are primarily set by the conditions in the neutron star core (Brown, Bildsten & Rutledge 1998). For a system like XTE J2123 -- 058 that has undergone one ≈ 40 day outburst, the deep crustal heating theory implies that quiescent thermal emission provides information about the neutron star core. Here, we compare the quiescent prop- erties of XTE J2123 -- 058 to similar systems. The compar- ison group includes field neutron star SXTs with outbursts lasting less than 1 year for which quiescent X-ray observa- tions have been reported. We only consider LMXB systems XTE J2123 -- 058 in Quiescence 5 from which X-ray bursts have been detected, proving that the accreting object is a neutron star. We restrict the compari- son group to field systems because the outburst histories for most transients in globular clusters are uncertain due to source confusion in instruments with angular resolution worse than Chandra. Thus, our comparison group consists of the neu- tron star SXTs Aql X-1, 4U 1608 -- 522, Cen X-4, and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609. We also compare the quiescent properties of XTE J2123 -- 058 to those of the millisecond X-ray pulsar SAX J1808.8 -- 3658 as the quiescent X-ray luminosities of the two sources are comparable. Table 4 compares the parameters of the thermal compo- nent for the five systems, including kTeff, R, L∞, and the gravitational redshift parameter, g = p1 - 2GM/Rc2, assum- ing that all the neutron star masses are 1.4 M⊙. For the spectral fits to XTE J2123 -- 058, we set R = 10 km, and Jonker, Wijnands & van der Klis (2004) make the same as- sumption for SAX J1810.8 -- 2609. However, for the other sources, we use the best fitted radii, and the parameters are taken from Rutledge et al. (1999, 2001, 2002a). The thermal component is detected for Cen X-4, Aql X-1, and 4U 1608 -- 522, and a power-law component is also required for Cen X- 4 and for some of the observations of Aql X-1. For XTE J2123 -- 058 and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609, the thermal component is not statistically required, and we report upper limits on the thermal component parameters for these two systems. Also, for all the sources we assume the best current distance mea- surement. The temperature upper limits for XTE J2123 -- 058 (66 eV) and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 (72 eV) are about a factor of 2.5 lower than the 4U 1608 -- 522 measurement of 170 eV, and the luminosity upper limits for XTE J2123 -- 058 and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 are about a factor of 50 lower than the maxi- mum quiescent luminosity measured for Aql X-1. The tem- perature and luminosity of Cen X-4 are intermediate between the hottest and most luminous sources (Aql X-1 and 4U 1608 -- 522) and the coolest and least luminous sources (XTE J2123 -- 058 and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609). Here, we characterize the outburst histories of these they are related to the five sources to determine if expected in the as quiescent thermal properties Brown, Bildsten & Rutledge (1998) theory. From a re- view of SXT light curves covering the time period between 1969 and 1996 (Chen, Shrader & Livio 1997) and the RXTE All-Sky Monitor (ASM) covering 1996 to 2003, 4U 1608 -- 522 had 16 outbursts with a mean peak X-ray luminosity, ¯Lpeak, of 2.5 × 1037 (d/3.6 kpc)2 ergs s- 1. Aql X-1 had 21 outbursts with ¯Lpeak = 3.6 × 1037 (d/5 kpc)2 ergs s- 1. Cen X-4 had two outbursts (in 1969 and 1979) with ¯Lpeak = 5.6 × 1037 (d/1.2 kpc)2 ergs s- 1, and XTE J2123 -- 058 had one outburst (in 1998) with ¯Lpeak = 1.7 × 1037 (d/8.5 kpc)2 ergs s- 1. Like XTE J2123 -- 058, SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 had only one outburst, also in 1998. is SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 was discovered by Natalucci et al. (2000); and the only reported X-ray detections of this source in outburst were from BeppoSAX and ROSAT in 1998 March (Natalucci et al. 2000; Greiner et al. 1999). However, the ASM light curve shown in Figure 3c indicates that SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 was in outburst by 1998 January 4 (MJD 50,817) and probably as early as 1997 December 18 (MJD 50,800). The dashed lines in Figure 3c mark the times of the BeppoSAX discovery at MJD 50,882 -- 50,885 and the ROSAT observation at MJD 50,896, while it is clear that the source was considerably brighter prior to this. From ) V e k 2 1 - 5 . 1 ( 1 - s M S A ) V e k 2 1 - 5 . 1 ( 1 - s M S A ) V e k . 2 1 - 5 1 ( 1 - s M S A ) V e k . 2 1 - 5 1 ( 1 - s M S A a. Aql X-1 80 60 40 20 0 2600 2650 2700 2750 MJD-50000 (days) 2800 2850 b. 4U 1608-522 80 60 40 20 0 2600 900 950 2400 2450 2500 2550 MJD-50000 (days) 10 c. SAX J1810.8-2609 5 0 -5 700 750 800 850 MJD-50000 (days) 10 d. XTE J2123-058 5 0 -5 900 950 1000 1050 MJD-50000 (days) 1100 FIG. 3. -- All-Sky Monitor (ASM) light curves for the four neutron star SXTs in our comparison group that had outbursts during the RXTE lifetime. Each point represents the average ASM count rate over 1 day. One Crab flux equals 75 ASM counts s- 1. For SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 (c), the vertical dashed lines mark the times of previously reported BeppoSAX and ROSAT observations. Aql X-1 and 4U 1608 -- 522 have had many outbursts during the lifetime of RXTE, and the light curves in (a) and (b) are representative. the 1.5 -- 12 keV ASM light curve, ¯Lpeak = 1.0 × 1037 (d/4.9 kpc)2 ergs s- 1. Although it has been suggested that SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 had an unusually low outburst luminosity (Jonker, Wijnands & van der Klis 2004), the value we derive from the ASM measurements is comparable to the other neu- tron star SXTs. Figure 3 also shows the ASM light curve for the XTE J2123 -- 058 outburst as well as sample outburst light curves for Aql X-1 and 4U 1608 -- 522 (Cen X-4 has not 6 J.A. Tomsick et al. had an outburst during the RXTE lifetime). These light curves demonstrate that individual outbursts from different sources are similar in duration (typically 40 -- 80 days) and overall shape, although it should be noted that exceptional outbursts do occur (Chen, Shrader & Livio 1997). For each of the neutron star SXTs, the time-averaged mass accretion rate over the past 33 years can be expressed as < M >= ¯LpeakNtoutburst f ǫc2(33yr) = s¯LpeakN , (1) where N is the number of outbursts, toutburst is the typical du- ration of an outburst from the source, f is a factor with a value less than 1.0 that accounts for the shape of the outburst light curve, ǫ is the fraction of the rest mass energy released from accreted matter, and s = toutburst f /ǫc2(33yr). As the du- rations and light curve shapes are similar for the sources in our comparison group, s is approximately the same for these sources, and the time-averaged mass accretion rate over the past 33 years is proportional to ¯LpeakN. We estimate s us- ing toutburst = 60 days and ǫ = 0.2, which is the value of ǫ that is typically assumed for accretion onto a neutron star (Rutledge et al. 2002b). Although the precise value of f de- pends on the exact shape of the outburst light curve, it can be approximated as the mean outburst flux divided by the peak flux. For the XTE J2123 -- 058 ASM light curve, the mean flux over a 60 day period that includes the 1998 outburst is 41% of the peak level, and we use f = 0.4, giving s = 1.1 × 10- 23 s2 cm- 2. Using this value of s for all five sources and the values for ¯Lpeak and the number of outbursts (N) given above, we cal- culate estimates of the time-averaged mass accretion rate over the past 33 years. The values for < M> are given in Table 4, and they show that this quantity is a relatively good predictor of L∞. Aql X-1 and 4U 1608 -- 522 have the the highest values of both < M> and L∞, XTE J2123 -- 058 and SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 have the lowest, and Cen X-4 is intermediate. The ratio of the value of < M> for Aql X-1 to that for XTE J2123 -- 058 is 45, which is consistent with their ratio of L∞, which is > 38. Similarly, the Aql X-1 to SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 ratio of < M> is 76, and this is consistent with their ratio of L∞, which is > 27. While these measurements are in line with the Brown, Bildsten & Rutledge (1998) theory, a caveat is that we cannot be certain that X-ray flux history over the past 33 years reflects the behavior over the last 10,000 years. We can use the Brown, Bildsten & Rutledge (1998) theory to predict the recurrence time for outbursts of XTE J2123 -- 058, assuming that the outbursts are similar. Using L = ǫ Mc2 and the expression relating Lq to the time-averaged mass accretion rate, Lq = 9 × 1032 < M>- 11 ergs s- 1, one ob- tains (see also Wijnands et al. 2001) Lq = [toutburst/(toutburst + tq)](<Loutburst>/130). Here, tq is the average time the source spends in quiescence between outbursts, <Loutburst> is the average luminosity during an outburst, and toutburst is de- fined above. For XTE J2123 -- 058, we used the RXTE/ASM light curve shown in Figure 3d to determine that the mean 1.5 -- 12 keV count rate during the 40 days (toutburst) between MJD 50,990 and MJD 51,030 was 3.2 s- 1, corresponding to <Loutburst>= 1.1 × 1037 ergs s- 1 for d = 8.5 kpc. From the lu- minosity upper limit of Lq < 1.4 × 1032 ergs s- 1, we obtain a lower limit on the recurrence time, toutburst + tq, of 67 years. The known outburst history of XTE J2123 -- 058, one outburst in 33 years, assuming that no outbursts were missed, is con- sistent with these long predicted recurrence times. However, if the recurrence time is in fact shorter than 67 years, then a mechanism of enhanced cooling of the core would be neces- sary. The most often mentioned mechanism is neutrino cool- ing of the core due to the direct Urca process, and this mech- anism requires a neutron star with a mass higher than 1.7 -- 1.8 M⊙(Colpi et al. 2001). The mass of the neutron star in XTE J2123 -- 058 has been measured at 1.5 ± 0.3 M⊙ or 1.04 -- 1.56 M⊙, so that the mass would have to be at the upper end of the error range for the direct Urca process to operate. While we have been focusing primarily on the implica- tions of the upper limit on the temperature and luminosity of the thermal component, it is notable that the power-law fit to the spectrum of XTE J2123 -- 058 also indicates that its X-ray luminosity, at (9+4- 3) × 1031 ergs s- 1 in the unabsorbed 0.3 -- 8 keV band, is among the lowest for neutron star SXTs. The quiescent luminosity of SAX J1810.8 -- 2609, ≈ 1 × 1032 ergs s- 1 (Jonker, Wijnands & van der Klis 2004), is essen- tially the same as for XTE J2123 -- 058, and the only other sys- tem in this class known to have a lower quiescent X-ray lumi- nosity, SAX J1808.4 -- 3658, is also the only millisecond X-ray pulsar system for which there is a measurement of its quies- cent X-ray spectrum. The XMM-Newton spectrum of SAX J1808.4 -- 3658 is well described by a power-law with Γ = 1.5 and a 0.5 -- 10 keV unabsorbed luminosity of 5 × 1031 ergs s- 1, and the upper limit on the contribution from a thermal com- ponent is 10% of the total X-ray luminosity (Campana et al. 2002). If the spectrum of XTE J2123 -- 058 consists of only a power-law component, then its Γ = 3.1+0.7 - 0.6 is quite a bit softer than that of SAX J1808.4 -- 3658, and the difference would have to be explained. On the other hand, if the spec- trum for XTE J2123 -- 058 consists of a thermal component and a power-law, then its power-law could have the same slope as SAX J1808.4 -- 3658. Concerning the SAX J1808.4 -- 3658 thermal component, Campana et al. (2002) conclude that en- hanced neutron star cooling is required to obtain a quiescent luminosity as low as the XMM-Newton upper limit implies. However, as mentioned above, such conclusions depend on the assumption that the recent outburst behavior is indicative of the average mass accretion rate over the past 10,000 years. In summary, our X-ray measurements of XTE J2123 -- 058 in quiescence show that this system is one of the faintest and least luminous of the neutron star SXTs. A comparison of the XTE J2123 -- 058 X-ray properties in outburst and quiescence to that of four other neutron star SXTs that exhibit short out- bursts shows that the systems with a higher degree of outburst activity tend to have more luminous thermal components in quiescence, and this is in-line with predictions of the theory of deep crustal heating. For XTE J2123 -- 058, the upper limit on the thermal luminosity is consistent with this theory without requiring enhanced neutron star cooling if the outburst recur- rence time is >67 years, which is consistent with the known outburst history of this source. JAT would especially like to thank Keith Arnaud for his help with statistical techniques and XSPEC. JAT acknowl- edges useful conversations with Tariq Shahbaz and Rudy Wijnands. JAT and PK acknowledge partial support from Chandra awards GO2-3051X and GO3-4043X issued by the Chandra X-ray Observatory Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of NASA under contract NAS8-39073. DMG acknowledges support from a CASS postdoctoral fellowship. XTE J2123 -- 058 in Quiescence 7 REFERENCES Brown, E. F., Bildsten, L., & Rutledge, R. E., 1998, ApJ, 504, L95 Campana, S., Colpi, M., Mereghetti, S., Stella, L., & Tavani, M., 1998, 1999, ApJ, 514, 945 Rutledge, R. E., Bildsten, L., Brown, E. F., Pavlov, G. G., & Zavlin, V. E., Campana, S., Israel, G. L., Stella, L., Gastaldello, F., & Mereghetti, S., 2004, 2001, ApJ, 551, 921 A&A Rev., 8, 279 ApJ, 601, 474 MNRAS, 329, 29 Campana, S., & Stella, L., 2003, ApJ, 597, 474 Campana, S., et al., 2002, ApJ, 575, L15 Casares, J., Dubus, G., Shahbaz, T., Zurita, C., & Charles, P. A., 2002, Cash, W., 1979, ApJ, 228, 939 Chen, W., Shrader, C. R., & Livio, M., 1997, ApJ, 491, 312 Colpi, M., Geppert, U., Page, D., & Possenti, A., 2001, ApJ, 548, L175 Dickey, J. M., & Lockman, F. J., 1990, ARA&A, 28, 215 Freeman, P. E., Kashyap, V., Rosner, R., & Lamb, D. Q., 2002, ApJS, 138, 185 Greiner, J., Castro-Tirado, A. J., Boller, T., Duerbeck, H. W., Covino, S., Israel, G. L., Linden-Vørnle, M. J. D., & Otazu-Porter, X., 1999, MNRAS, 308, L17 Haensel, P., & Zdunik, J. L., 1990, A&A, 227, 431 Heinke, C. O., Grindlay, J. E., Lloyd, D. A., & Edmonds, P. D., 2003, ApJ, Rutledge, R. E., Bildsten, L., Brown, E. F., Pavlov, G. G., & Zavlin, V. E., Rutledge, R. E., Bildsten, L., Brown, E. F., Pavlov, G. G., & Zavlin, V. E., 2002a, ApJ, 577, 346 Rutledge, R. E., Bildsten, L., Brown, E. F., Pavlov, G. G., Zavlin, V. E., & Ushomirsky, G., 2002b, ApJ, 580, 413 Shahbaz, T., Zurita, C., Casares, J., Dubus, G., Charles, P. A., Wagner, R. M., & Ryan, E., 2003, ApJ, 585, 443 Soria, R., Wu, K., & Galloway, D. K., 1999, MNRAS, 309, 528 Tavani, M., 1991, ApJ, 379, L69 Tomsick, J. A., Halpern, J. P., Kemp, J., & Kaaret, P., 1999, ApJ, 521, 341 Tomsick, J. A., Heindl, W. A., Chakrabarty, D., Halpern, J. P., & Kaaret, P., 2001, ApJ, 559, L123 570 Tomsick, J. A., Heindl, W. A., Chakrabarty, D., & Kaaret, P., 2002, ApJ, 581, Wijnands, R., Heinke, C. O., Pooley, D., Edmonds, P. D., Lewin, W. H. G., Grindlay, J. E., Jonker, P. G., & Miller, J. M., 2003a, astro-ph/0310144 Wijnands, R., Homan, J., Miller, J. M., & Lewin, W. H. G., 2003b, 588, 452 1999, ApJ, 513, L119 Homan, J., Méndez, M., Wijnands, R., van der Klis, M., & van Paradijs, J., Wijnands, R., Miller, J. M., Markwardt, C., Lewin, W. H. G., & van der Klis, Hynes, R. I., Charles, P. A., Haswell, C. A., Casares, J., Zurita, C., & Serra- Wilson, C. A., Patel, S. K., Kouveliotou, C., Jonker, P. G., van der Klis, M., astro-ph/0310612 M., 2001, ApJ, 560, L159 Ricart, M., 2001, MNRAS, 324, 180 Jonker, P. G., Wijnands, R., & van der Klis, M., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 94 Landolt, A. U., 1992, AJ, 104, 340 Levine, A., Swank, J., & Smith, E., 1998, IAU Circular, 6955 Natalucci, L., Bazzano, A., Cocchi, M., Ubertini, P., Heise, J., Kuulkers, E., in 't Zand, J. J. M., & Smith, M. J. S., 2000, ApJ, 536, 891 Lewin, W. H. G., Belloni, T., & Méndez, M., 2003, ApJ, 596, 1220 Zavlin, V. E., Pavlov, G. G., & Shibanov, Y. A., 1996, A&A, 315, 141 Zurita, C., et al., 2000, MNRAS, 316, 137 8 J.A. Tomsick et al. XTE J2123 -- 058 X-RAY AND OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS TABLE 1 UT Date 2000 July 24 2000 May 12 -- 13 Energy Band Exposure Time (s) 0.1 - 10 keV Observatory BeppoSAX MDM Lick Chandra MDM aThis is the MECS exposure time. The LECS exposure time is 17,080 s. 2002 September 11 Kron-Cousins R 2002 November 13 2002 November 25 46,340a 3 × 600 2 × 700 17,706 8 × 600 0.3 - 8 keV Harris R Harris R TABLE 2 SPECTRAL FITS Model a NH Γ b Fpl L/d2 8.5 c Fit kTbb (eV) -- 260+50 - 110 100+130 - 60 -- (1020 cm- 2) (10- 14 ergs cm- 2 s- 1) 3.1+2.8 - 0.8 -- 2.5+2.9 - 2.3 3.1+0.7 - 0.6 -- 2.5+2.1 - 2.5 7.0+40.0 - 7.0 0.0+40.0 - 0.0 8.0+38.0 - 8.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 1.2+31.9 - 0.5 -- 0.70+3.67 - 0.48 1.1+0.5 - 0.4 -- 0.7+0.5 - 0.5 pl bb bb+pl pl bb bb+pl aErrors are 90% confidence for all parameters. b0.3 -- 8 keV unabsorbed flux. At d = 8.5 kpc, Fpl = 10- 14 ergs cm- 2 s- 1 corresponds to 8.6 × 1031 ergs s- 1. cBolometric luminosity at d = 8.5 kpc. dFraction of 10,000 simulated spectra for which the C-statistic was better than the C-statistic obtained for the actual spectrum. -- 0.49+2.76 - 0.12 0.9+160 - 0.7 -- 0.63+0.22 - 0.20 0.6+36.9 - 0.5 240+60 - 50 110+180 - 90 (1032 ergs s- 1) Qualityd 0.69 0.97 0.66 0.69 0.987 0.64 TABLE 3 NSA PLUS POWER-LAW FITS d kTeff FNSA a (kpc) (eV) (10- 14 ergs cm- 2 s- 1) (1032 ergs s- 1) b L∞ Γ c Fpl (10- 14 ergs cm- 2 s- 1) < 1.1 < 1.1 < 1.0 6 < 57 8.5 < 66 11 < 73 a0.3 -- 8 keV unabsorbed flux. bBolometric luminosity as seen by a distant observer using 4πR2 σT 4 c0.3 -- 8 keV unabsorbed flux. At d = 8.5 kpc, Fpl = 10- 14 ergs cm- 2 s- 1 corresponds to 8.6 × 1031 ergs s- 1. 0.56+0.82 - 0.42 0.63+0.82 - 0.60 0.77+0.65 - 0.77 eff(1 - 2GM/Rc2), where R = 10 km and M = 1.4 M⊙. 2.3+1.4 - 2.5 2.5+1.4 - 3.1 2.8+1.9 - 3.4 < 0.80 < 1.4 < 2.1 NSA PARAMETERS FOR SHORT OUTBURST FIELD NS SXTS AND X-RAY ACTIVITY TABLE 4 b R gc L∞ (km) kTeff (eV) (ergs s- 1) Sourcea d (kpc) < M>d ( M⊙ yr- 1) 94 - 108e 13.2 (5.3 - 9.4) × 1033 0.828 1.3 × 10- 10 0.748 6.9 × 10- 11 0.824 1.9 × 10- 11 0.765 1.7 × 10- 12 0.765 2.9 × 10- 12 5.3 × 1033 4.8 × 1032 < 2.0 × 1032 < 1.4 × 1032 5 Aql X-1 3.6 170 ± 30 9.4 4U 1608 -- 522 1.2 12.9 Cen X-4 10 SAX J1810.8 -- 2609 4.9 XTE J2123 -- 058 8.5 10 aParameters for sources other than XTE J2123 -- 058 are from Rutledge et al. (1999, 2001, 2002a) and Jonker, Wijnands & van der Klis (2004). bBolometric luminosity as seen by a distant observer calculated using 4πR2σT 4 cg = p1 - 2GM/Rc2 assuming M = 1.4 M⊙. dThe time-averaged mass accretion rate over the past 33 years, estimated according to < M>= s¯LpeakN, where s = 1.1 × 10- 23 s2 cm- 2 (see Equation 1). eThe range of values found in three separate Chandra observations. 76 ± 7 < 72 < 66 effg2.
astro-ph/0102410	2	0102	2001-06-29T15:27:11	Broad Absorption Line Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with VLA-FIRST Radio Detections	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present 13 Broad Absorption Line (BAL) quasars, including 12 new objects, which were identified in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and matched within 2'' to sources in the FIRST radio survey catalog. The surface density of this sample of radio-detected BAL quasars is 4.5 +- 1.2 per 100 deg^2, i.e. approximately 4 times larger than previously found by the shallower FIRST Bright Quasar Survey (FBQS). A majority of these radio-detected BAL quasars are moderately radio-loud objects. The fraction of BAL quasars in the entire radio quasar sample, 4.8 +- 1.3 %, is comparable to the fraction of BAL quasars among the SDSS optical quasar sample (ignoring selection effects). We estimate that the true fraction of BAL quasars (mostly HiBALs) in the radio sample is 9.2 +- 2.6 % once selection effects are accounted for. We caution that the absorption troughs of 4 of the 13 radio-detected quasars considered do not strictly satisfy the standard BALnicity criterion. One or possibly two of the new radio-detected BAL quasars are of the rare ``iron LoBAL'' type. BAL quasars are generally redder than the median SDSS quasar at the same redshift.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version October 29, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 04/03/99 BROAD ABSORPTION LINE QUASARS IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY WITH VLA-FIRST RADIO DETECTIONS Kristen Menou1, Daniel E. Vanden Berk2, Zeljko Ivezi´c1, Rita S.J. Kim,1 Gillian R. Knapp1, Gordon T. Richards3, Iskra Strateva1, Xiaohui Fan4, James E. Gunn1, Patrick 5, Tim Heckman6, Julian Krolik6, Robert H. Lupton1, Donald P. Schneider3, B. Hall1 Donald G. York7 8, S.F. Anderson9, N.A. Bahcall1, J. Brinkmann10, R. Brunner11, I. Csabai6, M. Fukugita12, G.S. Hennessy13, P.Z. Kunszt6, D.Q. Lamb7, J.A. Munn14, R.C. , , 1 0 0 2 n u J 9 2 2 v 0 1 4 2 0 1 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Nichol15, G.P. Szokoly16 Draft version October 29, 2018 ABSTRACT We present 13 Broad Absorption Line (BAL) quasars, including 12 new objects, which were identified in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and matched within 2′′ to sources in the FIRST radio survey catalog. The surface density of this sample of radio-detected BAL quasars is 4.5 ± 1.2 per 100 deg2, i.e. approximately 4 times larger than previously found by the shallower FIRST Bright Quasar Survey (FBQS). A majority of these radio-detected BAL quasars are moderately radio-loud objects. The fraction of BAL quasars in the entire radio quasar sample, 4.8±1.3%, is comparable to the fraction of BAL quasars among the SDSS optical quasar sample (ignoring selection effects). We estimate that the true fraction of BAL quasars (mostly HiBALs) in the radio sample is 9.2 ± 2.6% once selection effects are accounted for. We caution that the absorption troughs of 4 of the 13 radio-detected quasars considered do not strictly satisfy the standard BALnicity criterion. One or possibly two of the new radio-detected BAL quasars are of the rare "iron LoBAL" type. BAL quasars are generally redder than the median SDSS quasar at the same redshift. Subject headings: quasars: general, absorption lines -- galaxies: active -- radio continuum: general -- catalogs -- surveys 1. INTRODUCTION The spectra of Broad Absorption Line (BAL) quasars show broad, blueshifted absorption troughs corresponding to highly-ionized restframe-UV transitions such as C iv, Si iv, N v, O vi, more rarely Mg ii and Al iii and even more rarely Fe ii (e.g. Hazard et al. 1987; Weymann et al. 1991; Becker et al. 1997). The similarity of the continuum and line emission of BAL and non-BAL quasars motivates the hypothesis that BAL quasars are not intrinsically dif- ferent from other quasars. The presence of BAL features in the spectra of only ∼ 10% of optically-selected quasars could naturally be explained by a difference in viewing an- gle if the subrelativistic outflow at the origin of the BAL features is not isotropic (Weymann et al. 1991). The pop- ular notion that the outflow is preferentially located in the plane of the disk surrounding the supermassive black hole has found support in spectro-polarimetric measurements for BAL quasars (e.g. Goodrich & Miller 1995; Cohen et al. 1995; see, e.g., Murray et al. 1995 for a theoretical wind model). This geometrical interpretation of BAL features sug- gests the possible existence of links between the BAL char- acteristics of a quasar and its radio properties (such as jet orientation, radio spectral index or even radio-loudness). Along those lines, Stocke et al. (1992) found that their sample of optically-selected BAL quasars revealed only radio-quiet sources, while BAL quasars were strikingly ab- sent from a sample of radio-loud objects. The authors pro- posed that the BAL phenomenon is simply anticorrelated with the mechanism giving rise to strong radio emission in quasars; they also noted the tendency for radio-loud 1Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, NJ 08544 2Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510 3Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 4Institute for Advanced Study, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 5 Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Departamento de Astronom´ıa y Astrof´ısica, Facultad de F´ısica, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile 6 Department of Physics & Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, 3701 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 7The University of Chicago, Astronomy & Astrophysics Center, 5640 S. Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 8Enrico Fermi Institute, 5640 So. Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60615 9University of Washington, Department of Astronomy, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195 10Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349-0059 11Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 12Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Midori, Tanashi, Tokyo 188-8502, Japan 13U.S. Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20392-5420 14U.S. Naval Observatory, Flagstaff Station, P.O. Box 1149, Flagstaff, AZ 86002-1149 15Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA-15232 16Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany 1 2 RADIO BAL QUASARS IN THE SDSS quasars at the high-end of the radio-loudness distribution to lack high-velocity BALs (see also Weymann et al. 1991). Other interpretations of the BAL phenomenon have been presented, such as the evolutionary scenario of Briggs, Turnshek & Wolfe (1984; see also Gregg et al. 2000) in which BAL quasars later become radio-loud objects. The mJy flux-limited VLA-FIRST survey (Becker, White & Helfand 1995) has challenged many of the stan- dard views concerning radio quasars and the BAL phe- nomenon. In the FIRST Bright Quasar Survey (FBQS; Gregg et al. 1996; White et al. 2000), FIRST sources with point-source optical counterparts brighter than 17.8 in the APM catalog POSS-I plates were systematically targeted for spectroscopic identification. The FBQS, besides chal- lenging the existence of a clear radio-dichotomy for quasars (White et al. 2000), has established beyond doubt the ex- istence of a population of radio-loud BAL quasars (Becker et al. 2000; see also Hazard et al. 1987; Becker et al. 1997, Brotherton et al. 1998; Wills, Brandt & Laor 1999). Fur- thermore, the population of radio-detected BAL quasars identified by the FBQS was found to exhibit a diversity of radio spectral indices (both steep and flat spectra) which may not support an interpretation of BAL quasars as pref- erentially edge-on oriented systems (Becker et al. 2000; see also Gregg et al. 2000). In this paper, we describe preliminary results for BAL quasars spectroscopically identified by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and matched within 2′′ to radio coun- terparts in the FIRST survey catalog. These results are part of a more ambitious project aimed at studying all SDSS sources with FIRST radio detections (see Ivezi´c et al. 2001; Knapp et al. 2001). Our main result is that, at the greater depth probed by SDSS in the optical, the surface density of radio-detected BAL quasars is ∼ 4 times larger than previously reported by the FBQS, with a ma- jority of moderately radio-loud objects. In §2, we describe how SDSS and FIRST sources were selected to be part of the sample of BAL quasars discussed. The sample and some of its characteristics are described in §3, while results concerning the optical (SDSS photo- metric) properties are emphasized in §4. We conclude in §5. 2. TARGET SELECTION 2.1. SDSS Photometric and Spectroscopic Systems The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000) uses a camera with an array of CCDs (Gunn et al. 1998) on a dedicated 2.5-m telescope (Siegmund et al. 2001) at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico, to obtain images in five broad optical bands over 10,000 deg2 of the high Galactic latitude sky (b ∼> 30o) centered approximately on the North Galactic Pole. The five filters (designated u′, g ′, r′, i′, and z ′) cover the entire wavelength range of the CCD response, longward of the atmospheric cutoff at short wavelengths (Fukugita et al. 1996). Photometric calibration is provided by simultaneous observations with a 20-inch telescope at the same site. The survey data pro- cessing software measures the properties of each detected object in the imaging data, and determines and applies as- trometric and photometric calibrations (Pier et al. 2001; Lupton et al. 2001).17 Based on their optical morphology and colors, a subset of the sources discovered in the imaging survey is selected for spectroscopic follow-up. The spectroscopic survey uses two fiber -- fed double spectrographs designed to cover the wavelength range 3800 -- 9200 A. The SDSS spectrographs achieve a spectral resolution of ∼ 1800 across the entire spectral range. Each spectrograph accepts 320 fibers, each of which subtends a diameter of 3 on the sky. Exposures are typically ∼ 45 − 60 minutes long. Details concerning the SDSS spectroscopic system are given by Uomoto et al. (2001) and Frieman et al. (2001). ′′ Quasar candidates are selected from their point-source optical morphology18 and optical colors such that they lie outside the stellar locus in color-color space (blue colors for z ∼< 2 quasars -- see box in Fig. 2a -- and red colors for z ∼> 3 quasars; Fan 1999; Fan et al. 1999). In addition, point sources with radio counterparts within 2′′ in the FIRST catalog are favored candidates for spectroscopy (because there is very little stellar contamination in radio matches, independent of the optical colors; Helfand et al. 1999; Ivezi´c et al. 2001; Knapp et al. 2001). The quasar selec- tion criteria used for this sample was not constant through- out the period of observations; however, all otherwise good quasar candidates with reddening corrected i∗ magnitudes brighter than 19 were flagged as spectroscopic targets. In addition, other quasar candidates (mostly high-redshift candidates) were selected as faint as i∗ = 20.5. Radio- detected quasar candidates were selected to the brighter of these limits, unless they were also high-redshift candi- dates (see Richards et al. 2001b for a detailed account on the selection for spectroscopic follow-up). 2.2. Matching to the VLA-FIRST Survey Catalog The identification in the FIRST catalog of several hun- dreds of radio counterparts to SDSS optical sources shows that there is very little contamination by spurious associa- tions at angular separations ∼< 2′′ (Ivezi´c et al. 2001). The FIRST catalog provides both peak and integrated 1.4 GHz flux densities down to 1 mJy (corresponding to a ∼ 5σ detection). The source radio morphology can be studied from the FIRST survey images.19 For comparison, the flux limit for the radio sample of Stocke et al. (1992) is typically 0.2-0.3 mJy. 3. RESULTS 3.1. The Sample of Quasars We report on results concerning 60 SDSS spectroscopic plates, covering a total sky area of ≈ 290 deg2. The total area was calculated by summing the areas corresponding to individual spectroscopic plates and by taking into ac- 17SDSS nomenclature: the names for sources have the format SDSSp Jhhmmss.ss+ddmmss.s, where the coordinate equinox is J2000, and the "p" refers to preliminary. The reported magnitudes are asinh magnitudes (Lupton, Gunn & Szalay 1999) and are based on a preliminary photometric calibration; to indicate this the filters have an asterisk instead of a prime superscript. The estimated current astrometric accuracies in each coordinate are 0.1′′ and the calibration of the photometric measurements are currently accurate to 0.02 -- 0.05 magnitudes. 18At low redshift, this morphology cut is not enforced so that extended AGN are included in the spectroscopic sample as well (Richards et al. 2001b). 19FIRST website: http://sundog.stsci.edu MENOU ET AL. 3 count the overlaps between the plates. The completeness of the radio sample is expected to be nearly 100% because only spectroscopic plates corresponding to regions covered by the VLA-FIRST survey were considered. Overall, a total of 2326 targets were spectroscopically identified as quasars (see Vanden Berk et al. 2001 for definition; see also Richards et al. 2001a), 96 of which show BAL fea- tures as determined by visual inspection. A subset of 272 quasars have reliable FIRST detections (i.e. radio coun- terparts within 2′′), while 13 of the 96 BAL quasars do.20 The focus of this paper is on these 13 radio-detected BAL objects, whose properties are listed in Table 1: J2000 coordinates, SDSS optical magnitudes u∗, g ∗, r∗, i∗, z ∗ (reddening-corrected), peak radio flux in the FIRST cat- alog, BALnicity index (see definition below), maximum outflow velocity Vmax, a representative absolute magni- tude, Mg∗ , radio-loudness R∗ (k-corrected ratio of radio to optical fluxes), 1.4 GHz specific radio luminosity LR (in erg−1 s−1 Hz−1), redshift z and BAL classification. The absolute magnitudes and specific radio luminosi- ties were calculated assuming the following cosmology: Ωm = 1, Ωλ = 0 (q0 = 0.5) and H0 = 50 km s−1 Mpc−1. The "BALnicity" index is a measure of the strength of an absorption trough, similar to an equivalent width, but requiring continuous absorption of at least 10% in depth and spanning at least 2000 km s−1, and excluding the re- gion within 3000 km s−1 of the quasar emission redshift (Weymann et al. 1991). C iv is used in all cases for which it is accessible and Mg ii is used otherwise. The quantity "Vmax" is the maximum outflow velocity of the absorption lines, relative to the quasar emission redshift. We only list peak flux densities because of their close agreement with the integrated values for all the sources, as expected for radio point sources. The compact radio morphology of the 13 BAL quasars listed was confirmed by inspecting the FIRST survey images for each object. of one can be A NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database objects (NED) (SDSSp the that search reveals identified with PKS J115944.81+011207.1) J1159+0112, that another one (SDSSp J003923.20- 001452.7) was detected as a radio source in the NVSS survey (with a compact radio morphology and a peak flux density consistent with the FIRST values) and that none of the objects listed has a counterpart in the IRAS survey catalog. No counterparts were found in the ROSAT All Sky Survey or 2MASS catalogs either (only 8 of the 13 listed objects are located in the sky region covered by the 2MASS Second Incremental Data Release21). Following Becker et al. (2000), we do not limit our BAL sample to the conservative definition of Weymann et al. (1991), which explains why four of the objects listed have a zero BALnicity index (i.e. if an absorption feature sat- isfied all the criteria of Weymann et al. except being be- yond 3000 km s−1 of the quasar emission redshift, the ob- ject was still considered as a potential BAL quasar). The justifications given by Becker et al. (2000) for including objects which do not strictly satisfy the BALnicity crite- rion are as follows: (i) nearly black absorption spanning ∼ 4000 km s−1, which is unlikely to break up into narrow lines, (ii) several absorption systems with a large Vmax value; none in excess of 2000 km s−1, but taken together they are suggestive of an intrinsic BAL outflow, (iii) ev- idence for partial covering, which is a property of BAL quasars and (iv) low-ionization lines in BAL quasars tend to be narrower than high-ionization lines (Voit, Weymann & Korista 1993), so that any BALnicity index which had to be calculated from low-ionization lines (because high- ionization lines could not be observed) are likely to be a lower limit. These same criteria motivate us to include four objects with a zero BALnicity index in our sample of radio-detected BAL quasars. SDSSp J003923.20-001452.7 has a measured BALnicity index > 0, but rounded down to 0; it satisfies criterion (i) and maybe criterion (iii). SDSSp J235702.55-004824.0 satisfies criterion (i) and maybe cri- terion (ii). SDSSp J115944.81+011207.1 satisfies criterion (i) except for Vmax ∼ 3000 km s−1; it satisfies criterion (ii): there is an additional broad absorption system at Vmax ∼ 8000 km s−1; it also appears to satisfy criterion (iii): the C iv absorption trough is nearly flat-bottomed with a residual flux indicating partial coverage. SDSSp J133903.41-004241.2 is the least convincing of its category; Mg ii absorption is black with Vmax = 1650 km s−1 , but the noisy C iv part of the spectrum may allow it to satisfy criterion (iv). The radio-loudness R∗ is calculated as the k-corrected ratio of the 5 GHz radio flux to the 2500 A optical flux (which is calculated from the B-band magnitude), follow- ing the definition of Stocke et al. (1992). We adopt the photometric transformation B ≃ g ∗ + 0.13 which is ap- propriate for the power-law spectra of quasars (see, e.g., Schmidt, Schneider & Gunn 1995) and we assume a power- law index αr = −0.5 (with fν ∝ να) in the radio (the same value of the radio power-law index was assumed for the k-correction when calculating LR). A power-law index αo = −0.5 was assumed when calculating the absolute magnitudes (see Vanden Berk et al. 2001 for a measure of αo from an SDSS quasar composite spectrum; see also Richards et al. 2001a). The redshifts were determined automatically by the SDSS spectroscopic pipeline and modified as necessary upon visual inspection (BAL quasar redshifts prove dif- ficult to measure automatically with precision but the modifications were generally not more than a few hun- dredths of a unit redshift). The BAL classification refers to the ionization states seen in absorption: Hi- BALs are defined as those exhibiting absorption only by high-ionization ions, LoBALs show both high- and low- ionization lines, and FeLoBALs are LoBALs with lines from meta-stable Fe ii and Fe iii. Examples of specific lines are Mg ii λ2800 for LoBAL (as well as, e.g., lines of Al ii, Al iii, Si ii, and C ii), C iv λ1549 for HiBAL, and Fe ii λ1063, 2261, 2380, 2600, 2750 and Fe iii λ1122, 1914 for FeLoBAL (Hazard et al. 1987). Of course, all the lines cannot be seen for all the quasars because of the finite spectral coverage in the observer frame. We note that one or possibly two of the 13 radio- detected BAL quasars reported here are of the rare FeLoBAL type, of which the FBQS has found only four ex- 20In what follows, we refer to objects without a FIRST radio detection as "radio-undetected" and objects with a FIRST radio detection as "radio-detected". 21Available at http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/second/index.html 4 RADIO BAL QUASARS IN THE SDSS amples (Becker et al. 2000) and only one other has been re- ported (Hazard et al. 1987). Five of the six known FeLoB- ALs have radio detections, which supports the speculation by Becker et al. (1997) that these quasars are associated with rather strong radio emission. We note, however, that the number of FeLoBALs in the radio-undetected sample is presently unknown and that these results still concern a small number of sources. The spectra of the 13 radio- detected BAL quasars listed in Table 1 are shown in Fig- ure 1. 3.2. General Properties Despite the small size of this sample of radio-detected BAL quasars, some interesting conclusions can be drawn. The surface density of radio-detected BAL quasars at the depth probed by SDSS is 4.5 ± 1.2 objects per 100 deg2, which is approximately 4 times larger than reported by the FBQS (with the same definition for the BAL sam- ple; Becker et al. 2000). This is expected given that the SDSS goes deeper than the limiting magnitude of 17.9 for the FBQS. Adopting a dividing line between radio-quiet and radio-loud objects at R∗ = 10 (following Stocke et al. 1992), we see that most of the objects identified by SDSS and found in the FIRST catalog are of a moder- ately radio-loud (10 < R∗ < 100) to strongly radio-loud (R∗ > 100) nature. This is the result of the greater depth probed by SDSS in the optical (as compared to the APM digitized POSS-I catalog used for the FBQS), which, given the mJy flux limit of the FIRST survey, tends to uncover objects which are more radio-loud than previously known. The specific radio luminosity LR alone is also sometimes used as a direct measure of the radio-loudness of quasars. Adopting a dividing line between radio-quiet and radio- loud objects at LR = 1032.5h−2 50 erg−1 s−1 Hz−1 (follow- ing Gregg et al. 1996 and Stern et al. 2000), we see again that a majority of the objects listed in Table 1 are on the radio-loud side.22 A more conservative cut at 1033 erg−1 s−1 Hz−1 still results in 7 out of the 13 objects being on the radio-loud side. Thus, we find no evidence of the anticorrelation of the radio-loud emission mechanism with the BAL phenomenon which was found by Stocke et al. (1992). The trend of moderate radio-loudness in our sample of radio-detected BAL quasars may, however, be consistent with the tendency found by Stocke et al. (1992; see also Weymann et al. 1991) for strongly radio-loud quasars to lack high-velocity BALs. One must temper the conclusion of this analysis, how- ever, by a few words of caution. In particular, we note that the BALnicity distribution of the radio-detected BAL quasars listed in Table 1 appears different (at a ≈ 2σ level) from that of the sample of radio-quiet BAL quasars of Weymann et al. (1991). While ∼ 25% of our BAL quasars have a BALnicity index > 3000 km s−1, ∼ 70% of the BAL quasars discussed by Weymann et al. (1991) do. These authors warn that quasars with a BALnicity index < 1500 km s−1 risk contamination by unusually strong "associated narrow absorbers" (as opposed to bona fide BAL features), which may be preferentially found in radio- louder objects. While nine of our radio-detected BAL quasars have a BALnicity index < 1500 km s−1, we note that those with a non-zero BALnicity index have large enough Vmax values to avoid contamination by associated narrow absorbers. The motivation for including the remaining four objects with zero BALnicity indices was given in §3.1. The overall low BALnicity of the sample is evident23 and it is inter- esting that the objects with zero BALnicity indices are among the radio-loudest ones. For this reason, we also quote radio-detected BAL fractions excluding the 4 sys- tems with a zero BALnicity index and refer to them in what follows as "conservative values". Interestingly, only ∼ 30% of the radio-detected BAL quasars found by the FBQS have a BALnicity index > 3000 km s−1, in agree- ment with our results. The discrepancy with the Wey- mann et al. sample may therefore indicate a real differ- ence between the populations of radio-quiet and radio-loud BAL quasars. We also note that the redshift distribution of our radio-detected BAL quasars appears different from that of the FBQS radio BAL quasars: none of our objects is found below z ∼ 1.5, while 11 of the 29 FBQS objects are in this low redshift range. Our results concerning various interesting fractions for the quasar sample are summarized in Table 2. In the total SDSS quasar sample, 11.7 ± 0.7% of all spectroscopically identified quasars have radio detections in the FIRST sur- vey, in agreement with a fraction 13.5 ± 3.8% for the BAL subsample only. The fraction of BAL quasars in the entire SDSS quasar sample is 4.1±0.4%, which is consistent with the fraction 4.8 ± 1.3% (conservative value: 3.3 ± 1.1%) of BAL quasars in the subsample of sources with radio de- tection. These values suggest that BAL quasars are not preferentially found among radio-detected quasars (in con- tradiction to Becker et al. 2000 for the FBQS), but are found in equal number among sources with and without a FIRST radio detection. This apparent discrepancy may be explained by the necessity for Becker et al. (2000) to compare their BAL quasar fraction (after correction for the selection effects) to those obtained in independent optical surveys. The combination of SDSS optical data and FIRST radio data should provide a more robust es- timate for the radio-detected and radio-undetected BAL fractions; a larger number of sources is required to settle this issue with confidence. The fractions of BAL quasars quoted above do not take into account the strong selection effects which affect the identification of BAL quasars (the restframe-UV absorp- tion features must be conveniently located in the optical spectral range observed). Accounting for these selection effects is usually done by assuming that there is no sig- nificant redshift dependence of the BAL quasar fraction. Under this assumption, we calculate the corrected frac- tion as the ratio of the number of BAL quasars to the 22Note that a FIRST source with a 1 mJy flux (the survey limit) must be at a redshift larger than 3 or so to automatically satisfy the above luminosity-based radio-loudness criterion. Although two of our objects have z > 3, both of them have flux densities four times brighter than the FIRST survey limit. 23We note that the absorption troughs in SDSSp J115944.81+011207.1 and SDSSp J235702.55-004824.0 could be characterized as associated absorption lines in the sense that they are contained within the corresponding broad emission line. On the other hand, FIRST sources being preferentially flat-spectrum sources, these two objects may not necessarily belong to the class of systems with associated absorption lines and usually steep radio spectra (see, e.g., Hamann et al. 2001). MENOU ET AL. 5 total number of quasars in the redshift range such that the detection of a specific restframe-UV absorption line is guaranteed given the SDSS spectral coverage (see, e.g., Becker et al. 2000 for a similar procedure for the FBQS). The redshift range relevant to LoBAL quasars is 0.4 ∼< z ∼< 1.7 based on Mg ii absorption. However, we find that Al iii absorption is present in nearly all the spec- tra showing Mg ii absorption. This effectively pushes the maximum detection redshift for LoBALs to z ≈ 3.9. This situation illustrates how the uniform signal to noise and extended spectral coverage of the SDSS will allow to de- fine more sophisticated BAL fractions (based on several specific lines) which should be less subject to selection ef- fects than usual. A total of 249 radio-detected quasars, in- cluding 7 LoBAL quasars, are found in the redshift range 0.4 ∼< z ∼< 3.9 (based on both Mg ii and Al iii absorption), so that the corrected LoBAL fraction is 2.8±1.1% (conser- vative value: 2.0 ± 0.9%) in the sample of radio-detected objects. The redshift range relevant to HiBAL quasars is z ∼> 1.4, so that C iv absorption would be seen if present. A total of 141 radio-detected quasars, including 13 HiBAL quasars (all the quasars listed in Table 1 show high-ionization BAL features), are found in this redshift range, so that the cor- rected HiBAL fraction is 9.2 ± 2.6% (conservative value: ∼ 6.4 ± 2.1%) in the sample of radio-detected objects. For the FBQS, Becker et al. (2000) find a corrected LoBAL fraction of ∼ 3%, which is consistent with the ∼ 2.8% above, but a corrected HiBAL fraction of 18 ± 3.8%, which is significantly higher than the 9.2 ± 2.6% HiBAL fraction of the present radio sample. We note that the HiBAL fraction in optical samples such as the LBQS is consistent with the ∼ 9% quoted here (e.g. Foltz et al. 1990). The same exercise for the radio-undetected BAL quasars re- quires a careful BAL classification for these objects, which is beyond the scope of this preliminary communication. 3.3. Optical Properties The optical properties of the sample of radio-detected BAL quasars are further described in Figures 2 and 3, where similar properties for the sample of radio-undetected BAL quasars are also shown. Fig 2a and 2b illustrate how most of the 96 BAL quasars were selected for spectroscopy, based on their location in the (u∗−g ∗, g ∗−r∗, r∗−i∗) SDSS color space. In one color plane or the other, most BAL quasars lie outside the stellar locus, indicated by contours and small dots (for individual objects) for an SDSS con- trol sample of 40, 000 point sources, almost all of which are stars. The photometric quality of the control sample was guaranteed by applying the following cuts: u∗, g ∗, r∗ < 21 and corresponding photometric errors < 0.1. The BAL quasars only fill the red side of the low-z quasar box (in- dicated by dashed lines in Fig. 2a) because of their rather large redshifts (z ∼> 1) and comparatively red colors (see below). The low-z quasar box approximates the region of color-space where the majority of z < 2.2 quasars are found. The circled objects (radio-detected BAL quasars) are evenly distributed among the BAL quasar sample in Fig. 2, showing that there is no detectable color difference between the radio-detected and radio-undetected objects. Figure 3a shows a redshift-magnitude (i∗) diagram for the BAL quasar sample, showing again no obvious trend separating the radio-detected sources from the radio- undetected ones. Since the standard photometric cut ap- plied in SDSS for spectroscopic follow-up is at i∗ < 19, Fig. 3a suggests that the sample of radio-detected BAL quasars is not strongly biased toward faint magnitudes (relative to the rest of the BAL sample) as could have resulted from the favored spectroscopic selection for radio- detected sources. Figure 3b shows a redshift-color (g ∗ − i∗) diagram for the BAL quasar samples. The g ∗ − i∗ color was chosen so that systematics appearing when strong emission lines enter or leave photometric bands (especially the r∗ band; Richards et al. 2001a) are minimized. The relation for the median color as a function of redshift found by Richards et al. (2001a) for a nearly identical sample of 2625 spectro- scopically identified quasars with SDSS colors is shown as a solid line, while the dashed lines indicate the 95% confi- dence limits. The location of many BAL quasars above the median value (solid line) clearly shows that BAL quasars are redder than the typical quasars spectroscopically iden- tified by SDSS, in agreement with previous results on the colors of BAL quasars (Sprayberry & Foltz 1992; Broth- erton et al. 2000; see also Weymann et al. 1991). This red nature is interpreted as continuum extinction rather than attributed to the presence of the absorption troughs in the BAL quasar spectra (Sprayberry & Foltz 1992; Ya- mamoto & Vansevicius 1999). This was confirmed here for the 13 radio-detected BAL quasars by inspection of the spectra and comparison to the SDSS composite spec- trum of Vanden Berk et al. (2001). We note that the red colors of BAL quasars could imply that they are strongly under-represented in magnitude-limited samples. Further work is required to address this question properly. Since ∼ 15% of the radio-undetected objects are be- low the median g ∗ − i∗ color, ∼ 2 of the radio-detected BAL quasars are expected below the median value if the two populations have similar color properties. One cannot conclude, however, from the absence of any radio-detected BAL quasar below the solid line that they are redder than radio-undetected BAL quasars because the samples are too small at this point to draw statistically significant conclu- sions. Interestingly, Richards et al. (2001a) found that many of the reddest quasars in their sample have FIRST radio detections. 4. CONCLUSION We described the properties of 13 BAL quasars spectro- scopically identified by the SDSS which possess radio coun- terparts in the VLA-FIRST survey catalog. This sample, from an area of ≈ 290 deg2, is the second largest sample of radio-detected BAL quasars after that reported by the FIRST Bright Quasar Survey (Becker et al. 2000). Despite the small statistical size of this sample, we were able to isolate some of its important characteristics. Be- cause of the SDSS limiting magnitude of ∼ 19 − 20 for our sample, compared to 17.9 for the FIRST Bright Quasar Survey, we find a density of radio-detected BAL quasars of ∼ 4.5 objects per 100 deg2, four times larger than in the FIRST Bright Quasar Survey. A majority of the newly identified radio-detected BAL quasars are moderately radio-loud objects, in contradiction with early claims of an anti-correlation between the radio-loud emis- sion mechanism and the BAL phenomenon. The prefer- ence for moderate radio-loudness in our sample may in- i.e. 6 RADIO BAL QUASARS IN THE SDSS dicate that strongly radio-loud quasars tend to lack high velocity BALs. Upon completion, the combination of the full set of SDSS data with the FIRST catalog should provide us with several hundreds of radio-detected BAL quasars, allowing a robust characterization of the properties of this popula- tion of rare objects. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is a joint project of The University of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Ad- vanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astron- omy, New Mexico State University, Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington. Apache Point Observatory, site of the SDSS telescopes, is operated by the Astrophysical Research Con- sortium (ARC). Funding for the project has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the SDSS member in- stitutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- tration, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Depart- ment of Energy, Monbusho, and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extra- galactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We are grateful to M. Strauss for useful discussions, R. Becker for comments on the manuscript and the ref- eree for a very useful report. Support for this work was provided by NASA through Chandra Postdoctoral Fellow- ship grant number PF9-10006 awarded (to KM) by the Chandra X-ray Center, which is operated by the Smith- sonian Astrophysical Observatory for NASA under con- tract NAS8-39073. GRK and IS acknowledge support from NASA grant NAG-3364. DPS and GTR acknowledge sup- port from NSF grant AST99-00703. REFERENCES Becker, R.H., Gregg, M.D., Hook, I.M., McMahon, R.G., White, R.L. & Helfand, D.J., 1997, ApJ, 479, L93 Becker, R.H., White, R.L. & Helfand, D.J., 1995, ApJ, 450, 559 Becker, R.H. et al., 2000, ApJ 538, 72 Briggs, F.H., Turnshek, D.A. & Wolfe, A.M., 1984, ApJ, 287, 549 Brotherton, M.S., et al., 1998, ApJ, 505, L7 Brotherton, M.S., Tran, H.D., Becker, R.H., Gregg, M.D., Laurent-Muehleisen, S.A. & White, R.L., 2000, ApJ, in press, astroph/0008396 Cohen, M.H. et al., 1995, ApJ, 448, L77 Fan, X., 1999, AJ, 117, 2528 Fan, X. et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1 Foltz, C., Chaffee, F., Hewett, P., Weymann, R. & Morris, S. 1990, BAAS, 21, 806 Frieman, J.A. et al., 2001, in preparation Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J.E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D.P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748 Goodrich, R.W. & Miller, J.S., 1995, ApJ, 448, L73 Gregg, M.D., Becker, R.H., White, R.L., Helfand, D.J., McMahon, R.G. & Hook, I.M., 1996, AJ, 112, 407 Gregg, M.D., Becker, R.H., Brotherton, M.S., Laurent-Muehleisen, S.A., Lacy, M. & White, R.L., 2000, ApJ, 544, 142 Gunn, J.E., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 3040 Hamann, F.W., Barlow, T.A., Chaffee, F.C., Foltz, C.B. & Weymann, R.J., 2001, ApJ in press, astroph/0011030 Hazard, C., McMahon, R.G., Webb, J.K. & Morton, D.C., 1987, ApJ, 323, 263 Helfand, D.J., Schnee, S., Becker, R.H., White, R.L. & McMahon, R.G., 1999, ApJ, 117, 1568 Ivezi´c, Z, et al., 2001, in preparation Knapp, G., et al., 2001, in preparation Lupton, R.H., et al. 2001, in preparation Lupton, R.H., Gunn, J.E. & Szalay, A.S. 1999, AJ, 118, 1406 Murray, N., Chiang, J., Grossman, S.A. & Voit, G.M., 1995, ApJ, 451, 498 Pier, J.R., et al. 2001, in preparation Richards, G.T. et al., 2001a, AJ, in press, astroph/0012449 Richards, G.T. et al., 2001b, in preparation Schmidt, M., Schneider, D.P. & Gunn, J.E., 1995, AJ, 110, 68 Siegmund, W., et al. 2001, in preparation Sprayberry, D. & Foltz, C.B., 1992, ApJ, 390, 39 Stern, D., Djorgovski, S.G., Perley, R.A., de Carvalho, R.R. & Wall, J.V., 2000, AJ, 119, 1526 Stocke, J.T., Morris, S.L., Weymann, R.J. & Foltz, C.B., 1992, ApJ, 396, 487 Uomoto, A. et al., 2001, in preparation Vanden Berk, D.E. et al., 2001, AJ, in press, astroph/0105231 Voit, G.M., Weymann, R.J. & Korista, K.T., 1993, ApJ, 413, 95 Weymann, R.J., Morris, S.L., Foltz, C.B. & Hewett, P.C., 1991, ApJ, 373, 23 Wills, B.J., Brandt, W.N. & Laor, A., 1999, ApJ, 520, L91 Yamamoto, T.M. & Vansevicius, V., 1999, PASJ, 51, 405 York, D.G. et al 2000, AJ, 120, 1579 MENOU ET AL. 7 SDSS Broad Absorption Line Quasars with FIRST Detections Table 1 RA (J2000) Dec (J2000) u∗ g∗ r∗ i∗ z∗ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 00 39 23.20 −00 14 52.7 20.85 20.39 20.07 19.75 19.41 03 05 43.45 −01 06 22.1 21.13 20.05 19.89 19.54 19.55 11 54 04.14 +00 14 19.5 18.85 18.18 17.9 17.76 17.73 11 59 44.81 +01 12 07.1 18.30 17.48 17.23 16.99 16.72 13 02 08.27 −00 37 31.6 18.75 18.46 17.93 17.59 17.57 13 21 39.86 −00 41 52.0 23.37 20.37 19.25 18.65 18.41 13 23 04.58 −00 38 56.7 18.61 18.54 18.24 17.81 17.77 13 31 50.52 +00 45 18.8 19.28 19.26 19.14 18.91 18.9 13 39 03.41 −00 42 41.2 22.14 21.63 21.02 20.27 20.01 14 01 12.01 +01 11 12.3 20.28 19.89 19.59 19.10 19.02 15 16 36.78 +00 29 40.5 19.83 18.51 17.65 17.26 17.12 16 04 12.39 −00 08 07.9 20.74 19.61 19.42 19.12 18.99 23 57 02.55 −00 48 24.0 22.17 19.38 19.03 18.78 18.53 Sp (mJy) (8) 21.2 5.2 1.5 266.5 11.2 4.1 8.9 2.9 2.0 3.1 2.2 1.4 4.0 BALnicitya (km s−1) (km s−1) Vmax a Mr ∗ R∗ log(LR) za (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) BAL Type (15) 0 400 4100 0 1200 3500 300 1300 0 1500 6700 600 0 12150 −25.99 16200 −26.68 10050 −26.48 12150 −25.83 9600 −26.58 12900 −25.94 5100 −25.15 419.3 69.4 4.2 3000 −27.82 377.4 41.3 70.4 34.6 21.9 1650 −23.11 142.6 41.6 7.6 12.6 28.4 10350 −25.17 25000 −27.05 7200 −26.42 4050 −26.77 Hib Hi Lo Hic Lo 33.62 2.233 33.21 2.850 32.18 1.604 34.63 1.989 33.11 1.672 33.17 3.080 FeLo 33.08 1.821 32.63 1.892 32.28 1.518 32.59 1.771 32.64 2.248 FeLo? 32.64 2.832 33.15 3.005 Hi Hi Lo d Lo Hi Lo e aThe BALnicity values have been rounded to the nearest 100 km s−1 and the Vmax values to the nearest 150 km s−1 to reflect the estimated precision. The estimated uncertainties in the redshift measurements (based on MgII if available or CIII] otherwise) are < 0.005 for all the objects, except SDSSp J132139.86-004152.0 for which the redshift measurement is accurate only to 0.02. bNED: NVSS source J003923-001452; possibly MgII BAL. Measured BALnicity is > 0 (rounded here), but value is consistent with 0 given spectral resolution and flux density errors. cNED: identified with PKS J1159+0112; possibly MgII BAL; Vmax < 5000 km s−1. dused MgII BAL; Vmax < 5000 km s−1. eVmax < 5000 km s−1. 8 RADIO BAL QUASARS IN THE SDSS Radio and BAL Fractions in the SDSS Quasar Sample Table 2 Sub-sample Fraction Quasars with Radio Detection: BAL Quasars with Radio Detection: Quasars with BAL Features (uncorrected): Radio Quasars with BAL Features (uncorrected): Radio Quasars with LoBAL Features (corrected): Radio Quasars with HiBAL Features (corrected): 11.7 ± 0.7% 13.5 ± 3.8% 4.1 ± 0.4% 4.8 ± 1.3% (3.3 ± 1.1%)a 2.8 ± 1.1% (2.0 ± 0.9%)a 9.2 ± 2.6% (6.4 ± 2.1%)a aThe fraction in parenthesis corresponds to the value obtained when a con- servative BAL definition is adopted (see text). MENOU ET AL. 9 Fig. 1. -- Mosaic of rest-frame SDSS spectra for the 13 BAL quasars with FIRST detections (SDSSp J115944.81+011207.1 can be identified with PKS J1159+0112). The location of Lyβ/O vi, Lyα, N v, O i/Si ii, C ii, Si iv/O iv, C iv, Al iii, C iii] and Mg ii emission lines are indicated by dotted lines. The spectra have a nearly constant resolution of approximately 1800. They were all smoothed over 3 pixels, except for the lowest redshift one which was smoothed over 7 pixels. 10 RADIO BAL QUASARS IN THE SDSS Fig. 1. -- continued MENOU ET AL. 11 Fig. 2. -- (a) Color-color diagram (u∗ − g∗ vs. g∗ − r∗) for 13 radio-detected BALs (circled symbols) and 96 radio-undetected BALs (bare symbols). Bright objects (i∗ < 19) are indicated by filled circles and faint ones (i∗ ≥ 19) by filled triangles. The background contours and dots represent the stellar locus for ∼ 40, 000 point-source objects in an SDSS control sample. The dashed lines show the location of the low-redshift quasar box (see text for details). (b) The corresponding g∗ − r∗ vs. r∗ − i∗ color-color diagram. 12 RADIO BAL QUASARS IN THE SDSS Fig. 3. -- Same notation as Fig. 2. (a) Redshift-magnitude (i∗) distribution of the BAL quasars. (b) Color-redshift distribution of the BAL quasars, compared to the median color-redshift relation (solid line) derived by Richards et al. (2001a; dashed lines indicate 95% confidence limits). The BAL quasars are redder than the typical quasars spectroscopically identified by SDSS.
astro-ph/0006025	1	0006	2000-06-01T19:05:10	Infrared interferometric observations of young stellar objects	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present infrared observations of four young stellar objects using the Palomar Testbed Interferometer (PTI). For three of the sources, T Tau, MWC 147 and SU Aur, the 2.2 micron emission is resolved at PTI's nominal fringe spacing of 4 milliarcsec (mas), while the emission region of AB Aur is over-resolved on this scale. We fit the observations with simple circumstellar material distributions and compare our data to the predictions of accretion disk models inferred from spectral energy distributions. We find that the infrared emission region is tenths of AU in size for T Tau and SU Aur and ~1 AU for MWC 147.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Infrared Interferometric Observations of Young Stellar Objects 1 R.L. Akeson2,3, D.R. Ciardi4, G.T. van Belle3, M.J. Creech-Eakman3 and E.A. Lada4 ABSTRACT We present infrared observations of four young stellar objects using the Palomar Testbed Interferometer (PTI). For three of the sources, T Tau, MWC 147 and SU Aur, the 2.2 µm emission is resolved at PTI's nominal fringe spacing of 4 milliarcsec (mas), while the emission region of AB Aur is over-resolved on this scale. We fit the observations with simple circumstellar material distributions and compare our data to the predictions of accretion disk models inferred from spectral energy distributions. We find that the infrared emission region is tenths of AU in size for T Tau and SU Aur and ∼1 AU for MWC 147. Subject headings: stars:pre-main sequence, circumstellar matter 1. Introduction Observational evidence for circumstellar material around most young stellar objects (YSOs) includes infrared emission in excess of that expected from the stellar photosphere, broad forbidden line profiles, and emission at millimeter wavelengths. Although the dust column density is inferred to be quite high, the sources are often optically visible, implying a geometrically flat distribution of the material. A disk morphology is also predicted by star formation theories as a consequence of conservation of angular momentum. Evidence for circumstellar disks has been observed around sources with a range of masses, from near solar (T Tauri stars) to greater than 10 M⊙ (Herbig Ae/Be stars) (see e.g. Mundy, Looney and Welch (2000); Natta, Grinin and Mannings (2000)). Disks not only provide a conduit for material to accrete onto the central star, but are also a reservoir of material from which a potential planetary system might form. The structure of YSO circumstellar disks has been studied using spectral energy distributions (SED), spectral line profiles and imaging at infrared and (sub)-millimeter wavelengths. The dust continuum emission from disks around several T Tauri sources has been resolved at millimeter wavelengths (see review by Wilner and Lay (2000)). These observations are sensitive to emission 1to be published in the Astrophysical Journal 2Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology MS 100-22, Pasadena, CA, 91125 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 171-113, 4800 Oak Grove, Pasadena, CA 91109 4University of Florida, 211 Bryant Space Sciences Bldg, Gainesville, FL 32611 – 2 – from cooler dust and provide spatial information on size scales of several 10's of AU. The disk physical properties on much smaller scales (< few AU) are generally inferred through examination of the spectral line shapes and modeling of the SED. Unresolved issues regarding the inner disk structure include the possible existence of inner disk holes (e.g. Hillenbrand et al. (1992)) and the validity of simple power law scalings to describe globally the temperature and density profiles of the disk. Characterizing the physical properties of the inner disk is important for theories of hydrodynamic disk winds and for understanding the initial conditions of planet formation. Infrared interferometry provides a method to directly observe the inner disk. To date, only a few YSOs have been observed using this technique (e.g. FU Ori: Malbet et al. (1998) and AB Aur: Millan-Gabet et al. (1999)). Here we present K-band long baseline interferometric observations of four YSOs: T Tau, SU Aur, AB Aur, and MWC 147. PTI has a fringe spacing of ∼4 mas, corresponding to 0.6 AU at the distance of Taurus-Aurigae (140 pc) and to 3 AU at the distance of MWC 147 (800 pc). 2. Observations and data reduction Observations were made in the K band at PTI, which is described by Colavita et al. (1999). The data were obtained between September and December 1999. For each source, the number of nights, the total number of records (each of which contains 25 seconds of data) and the calibrators used are given in Table 1. The data were calibrated using the standard method described in Boden et al. (1998). A synthetic wideband channel is formed from the five spectrometer channels. The system visibility is measured with respect to the calibrators. The calibrator sizes were estimated using a blackbody fit to photometric data from the literature and were confirmed to be internally consistent when two or more calibrators were observed in a given night, which occurred on most nights. The calibrators were chosen by their proximity to the sources and for their small angular size, minimizing systematic errors in deriving the system visibility. All calibrators used in this reduction have angular diameters < 0.8 mas and were assigned uncertainties of 0.1 mas, except for HD 46709 (θ = 1.8 ± 0.2 mas). The data are presented in normalized squared visibility, which is an unbiased quantity. The averaged squared visibility and error are given for each source in Table 1. The uncertainties for the calibrated visibilities are a combination of the calibrator size uncertainty and the internal scatter in the data. 3. Models Of the four objects discussed in this paper, three were resolved and the fourth was over-resolved (no fringes were detected). In this section we first detail the models and then discuss each source separately in the following section. The models fit to the data are a uniform brightness profile, a Gaussian brightness profile, and a binary companion. We also compare the data to accretion disk – 3 – models. The uniform and Gaussian profiles are presented as simple geometric distributions which can be used as size scale estimators. At the distances to these systems (140 to 800 pc) the central star is unresolved (θ < 0.1 mas). For the uniform and Gaussian distributions and the accretion disk models, a stellar component has been included as an unresolved source with the appropriate flux ratio. This ratio was determined by subtracting the photospheric flux from a star of the appropriate spectral type from the total K band flux. For these objects, the infrared emission on milliarcsec scales is dominated by thermal emission and scattering can be neglected (Malbet and Bertout 1995). 3.1. Uniform and Gaussian profiles Two of the simplest geometric models which can be used to describe the circumstellar material distribution are a uniform brightness profile and a Gaussian profile. For a face-on Gaussian or uniform profile, the predicted visibility is simply a function of the projected baseline. For the uniform profile, the squared visibility is V 2 =(cid:20) 2J1(πθBp/λ) πθBp/λ (cid:21)2 (1) where J1 is a Bessel function, θ is the diameter, and Bp is the projected baseline. For a Gaussian profile (2) V 2 = exp"− where D is the FWHM. π2 ln 2(cid:18) D 2(cid:19)2 B2 λ #!2 p For an inclined profile, the visibility is also a function of hour angle. As none of the sources show definitive visibility structure with hour angle, we limit ourselves to the simple face-on case. The observations cover hour angle ranges of -2 to 2 hours for T Tau, -2 to 0 hours for SU Aur and -3 to 1 hours for MWC 147. Although other inclinations and position angles are not necessarily excluded by the data, we note that inclination angles near edge-on would produce significant visibility variations with hour angle, which are not seen. The best fit uniform and Gaussian profile sizes for each source are given in Table 1. 3.2. Binary companion A reduction from unity visibility can be produced by a binary companion. If both components are individually unresolved, the visibility is given by V 2 = 1 + R2 + 2R cos[(2π/λ)B · s] (1 + R)2 (3) – 4 – where R is the flux ratio, B is the baseline vector and s (in radians) is the binary angular separation vector. To test if the measured visibilities are consistent with a binary, a grid of binary parameters was formed and model visibilities were calculated and compared to data binned by projected base- line. The binary parameter space considered contained primary/secondary flux ratios (R) from 1 to 30 and separations (s) up to 100 mas, which corresponds to the coherence length of the spectral channels. Binary companions beyond this separation with sufficient magnitude to affect the mea- sured visibility have been ruled out by speckle or adaptive optics observations (T Tau and SU Aur, Ghez et al. (1993); MWC147, Corporon (1998)). 3.3. Accretion disk Emission from an accretion disk is one of the leading explanations for the infrared excess and other observed features of T Tauri stars and has also been proposed for Herbig Ae/Be stars. One common method of describing the physical properties of the accretion disk is to parameterize the temperature (T ) and surface density (Σ) as power-law functions of the radius (T ∝ r−q, Σ ∝ r−p) and the dust opacity as a power-law function of wavelength (κ ∝ λα). At 2.2 µm the disk is optically thick and the emission profile at a given radius depends on the temperature distribution (Beckwith et al. 1990). As we have only sampled one spatial scale in the disk, we will use accretion disk models from the literature, where the SED or millimeter imaging has been used to determine the disk parameters. 4. Results 4.1. T Tau T Tauri, one of the best-studied YSOs, has an infrared companion, T Tau S, 0.′′7 to the south, which is optically obscured. Both components have a near-infrared excess, suggestive of circumstellar material. Recent observations (Koresko 2000) have revealed that T Tau S is also a binary. The millimeter wave flux is dominated by material surrounding T Tau N and is consistent with circumstellar disk models with an outer radius of 40 AU (Akeson et al. 1998). At K band, T Tau N is the component with higher flux and thus, it contributes most to the measured visibility. The binary separation is sufficiently large such that the fringe envelopes of the two sources do not overlap and thus T Tau S does not contribute any coherent flux. However, it is within the field of view of the star and fringe trackers and therefore contributes incoherent flux, reducing the observed V 2 on T Tau N by R2/(1 + R)2, where R is the flux ratio between T Tau N and S. For these observations the ratio has two components, the intrinsic K band flux ratio of the system and an instrumental flux ratio introduced by an optical fiber, both of which are discussed below. – 5 – At PTI, the angle tracking passband is 0.7-1.0 µm. T Tau N is brighter than T Tau S in the (1998) measured a ratio of >2000 in the I band; thus the field will be visible, Stapelfeldt et al. centered on T Tau N. As the optical path for the spectrometer channels includes a fiber with 1′′ FWHM, the flux contribution from T Tau S is reduced. The relative coupling of the N/S flux was calculated in the following way. An Airy pattern given by the diffraction limit of 1.′′2 was convolved with a 1′′ Gaussian representing the seeing. We then use a matched filter of a Gaussian with 1′′ FWHM for the fiber, which is centered on T Tau N. The errors were conservatively estimated by assuming the fiber FWHM to have an error of 50%. The resulting fiber coupling ratio (N/S) is 1.50 ±0.2. The total flux and flux ratio for the T Tau system varies on time scales of weeks to months (1996)) and so roughly contemporaneous flux ratios are necessary. T. Beck (e.g. Skrutskie et al. (private communication) measured a N-S flux ratio of 1.96±0.19 on 31 Oct 1999. The last four nights of our data were taken on 20 and 26 Oct and 2 and 3 Nov 1999. In the analysis below, we assume the flux ratio measured by Beck is valid for these 4 nights and use only these data. We note that we have no direct way of knowing that the detected fringes arise from T Tau N instead of T Tau S. An alternate explanation for the detection is that the fringes arise from T Tau S. If this were the case, the expected visibility with T Tau S unresolved is V 2=0.07, much lower than that observed. The low visibility is due to the flux and fiber ratios still favoring T Tau N and would be even lower if T Tau S were resolved. The stability of the fringe tracking and the consistency of the night to night measurements strongly suggest that only 1 of the binary components is detected, and given the above argument, we deduce that T Tau N is the detected component. To correct for T Tau S, the visibilities were divided by R2/(1 + R)2 before modeling was performed, where R represents the correction for both the intrinsic flux ratio and the coupling effect described above and is 2.94 ±0.48. For the stellar parameters estimated by Ghez et al. (1991) using optical photometry, the total to stellar flux ratio at K is 3.6 for T Tau N. The stellar contribution is included in the models as an unresolved component. The visibilities show a slight dependence on hour angle, but more data are needed to confirm this effect. The data were reduced and binned by projected baseline before being fit by Gaussian and uniform profile models. The best fit uniform profile diameter is 2.62+0.046 −0.044 mas (0.37 AU) and the best fit Gaussian has a FWHM of 1.61+0.028 −0.031 mas (0.22 AU) (Figure 1a). For the accretion disk model, we have used the parameters derived by Ghez et al. (1991) with rinner = 0.04 AU, router = 100 AU, a temperature profile T ∝ r−0.42 and T (1 AU) = 260 K. This accretion disk model overestimates the measured visibility and, thus, underestimates the size scale. Using the disk parameters derived by Akeson et al. (1998) from millimeter wave emission (rinner = 0.01 AU, router = 40 AU, T ∝ r−0.6, T (1 AU) = 100 K), the predicted size is even smaller than the Ghez model. The binary parameters which fit the measured visibilities are shown in Figure 1b, where the – 6 – contours are for χ2 r of 1, 2 and 4. We note that if a binary companion at the separation shown in Figure 1b were in a roughly circular orbit around T Tau N, we should have seen visibility changes in the data given the time span covered by the observations. However, no time dependence was seen in the data. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 2 V 1.61 mas Gaussian 2.62 mas uniform disk Accretion disk (Ghez) Accretion disk (Akeson) Binary companion 0 0 20 40 80 Projected baseline (m) 60 100 120 o i t a r x u F l 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Binary separation (mas) Fig. 1.- Binned data and models for T Tau. The models are Gaussian profile (solid line), uniform profile (dotted line), accretion disk from Ghez et al. (1991) (dash-dot line), accretion disk from Akeson et al. (1998) (thick solid line at top) and binary companion (dashed line). The plotted visibilities have been corrected for the incoherent flux of T Tau S, as described in §4.1. The binary parameters represented are separation of 1.5 mas and a flux ratio of 4.3. b) Contour plot of possible binary companion parameters. The contour levels represent models with a χ2 r of 1, 2, and 4. 4.2. SU Aur SU Aur is a T Tauri star with an SED similar to that of T Tau. Herbig and Bell (1988) designated SU Aur as the prototype of a separate classification from weak-line T Tauris due to its broad absorption lines and high luminosity (∼ 12 L⊙). The stellar/total flux ratio at K is 0.3 (Marsh and Mahoney 1992). The best fit diameters are 1.92+0.063 −0.039 mas for a uniform profile and a Gaussian (FWHM) respectively (Figure 2a). This corresponds to a physical size of 0.27 and 0.16 AU for a distance of 140 pc. The accretion disk model is taken from Beckwith et al. (1990) with rinner = 0.01 AU, router = 100 AU, a temperature profile T ∝ r−0.51 and T (1 AU) = 260 K, where the parameters were determined by fitting 10 µm through millimeter wave fluxes. This model underestimates the observed visibility. −0.059 mas and 1.16+0.038 The binary parameter space for models with reduced chi-squared, χ2 r of 1, 2 and 4 is shown – 7 – in Figure 2b. The pattern shown in the figure repeats in separation space to roughly 20 mas. The binary companion hypothesis for SU Aur is not well constrained due to the limited time and baseline coverage of the data. The time coverage we do have favors orbiting companions with separations at roughly 2 or 6 mas. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 2 V 1.16 mas Gaussian 1.92 mas uniform disk Accretion disk Binary companion o i t a r x u F l 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 20 40 80 Projected baseline (m) 60 100 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Binary separation (mas) Fig. 2.- a) Binned data and models for SU Aur. The models are Gaussian profile (solid line), uniform profile (dotted line), accretion disk (dashed line) and binary companion (dash-dot line). The binary parameters represented are separation of 2 mas and a flux ratio of 10. b) Contour plot of possible binary companion parameters. Note that this pattern repeats in separation space to 20 mas. The contour levels represent models with a χ2 r of 1, 2, and 4. 4.3. MWC 147 MWC 147 (HD 259431) is a Herbig Ae/Be star with spectral classifications in the literature ranging from B2 to B6. Hillenbrand et al. (1992) modeled the SED from this source as arising from a flat, optically thick disk with an inner hole. Previous studies have used a distance to this source of 800 pc, which we will use here for consistency, although we note a recent distance determination from Hipparcos data of 290+200 −84 pc (Bertout et al. 1999). If the distance to MWC 147 is ∼290 pc, the physical sizes given below decrease by a factor of 2.8. Depending upon which spectral type is used, the stellar contribution to the flux at K is 0.05 to 0.1 of the total. We use an unresolved component with 0.1 of the total flux to represent the central star in these models. Using a stellar contribution of 0.05 would increase the squared visibility due to the disk by 4%. The data were reduced as described above and binned by projected baseline. The data and models are shown in Figure 3a. Given the errors on the individual data points, there is no significant – 8 – dependence on hour angle in the visibility data, consistent with Millan-Gabet (1999b). The best fit uniform profile diameter is 2.28+0.017 −0.034 mas (1.8 AU) and the best fit Gaussian has a FWHM of 1.38+0.013 −0.014 mas (1.1 AU). The accretion disk and stellar parameters were taken from Hillenbrand et al. (1992) with rinner = 0.36 AU, router = 1.8 AU and a temperature profile T ∝ r−3/4. The M = 10−5 reference temperature is set by the stellar temperature, 2×104 K, and the accretion rate, M⊙/year. As seen in Figure 3a, this accretion disk model underestimates the measured visibility and so overestimates the physical size. The observed visibilities for MWC 147 can also be explained by a binary companion. Figure 3b shows the parameter space for binary models with reduced χ2 r of 1, 2, and 4. An adaptive optics survey by Corporon (1998) found a binary companion to MWC 147 with a separation of 3.′′1 and magnitude difference ∆K = 5.7. This source is too widely separated and too faint to have affected our observations. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 2 V 1.38 mas Gaussian 2.28 mas uniform disk Accretion disk Binary companion 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 o i t a r x u F l 0 0 20 40 80 Projected baseline (m) 60 100 120 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 Binary separation (mas) 2.5 3.5 4 Fig. 3.- a) Binned data and models for MWC 147. The models are Gaussian disk (solid line), uniform disk (dotted line), accretion disk (dashed line) and binary companion (dash-dot line). The binary parameters represented are a separation of 2.1 mas and a flux ratio of 6. b) Contour plot of possible binary companion parameters. The contour levels represent models with a χ2 r of 1, 2, and 4. 4.4. AB Aur AB Aur is a Herbig Ae/Be star with a spectral type of A0, at a distance of 140 pc. Millan- Gabet et al. (1999) resolved the infrared emission from this source with the IOTA interferometer using baselines of 21 and 38 m. At PTI, fringes were not detected on AB Aur, despite a photon – 9 – flux higher than that for T Tau, indicating that the AB Aur is too large to be detected on baselines of ∼100 m with current sensitivities. Upper limits were found for the visibility using the sensitivity of the detection algorithm and measuring the system visibility with a calibrator. At K band, the estimated upper limit was hV 2i < 0.08 ± 0.02, which corresponds to a size >4.1(±0.2) mas (0.57 AU) diameter for a uniform profile and > 2.7(±0.1) mas (0.38 AU) for a Gaussian. These results are consistent with the size and derived by Millan-Gabet et al. (1999) and a previous upper limit from PTI of hV 2i < 0.3 from Berger (1998). 5. Discussion The fundamental result of these observations is that for all four sources observed here, the infrared emission arising from circumstellar material is resolved by PTI with a nominal fringe spacing of 4 mas. The measured sizes correspond to physical scales of tenths of AU for the T Tauri sources T Tau and SU Aur and ∼1 AU for the Herbig Ae/Be star MWC 147. We note that if the correct distance for MWC 147 is 290 pc, rather than 800 pc, then the measured visibility corresponds to a size scale of roughly 0.5 AU, similar to that measured for the T Tauri sources, despite the large difference in stellar mass. Our measured visibilities do not agree with those predicted from accretion disk models derived from near-infrared SEDs or millimeter interferometric observations. This may suggest that the single power-law relations used to describe the temperature and density are inadequate to reproduce both the spectral and spatial characteristics of the emission. Our data on T Tau and SU Aur require the K band emission to come from a larger region than that predicted by the accretion disk models, while the opposite is true for MWC 147. Millan-Gabet (1999b) observed 15 Herbig Ae/Bes using infrared interferometry with a shorter baseline and found that roughly half of the sources could not be well modeled as emission from an accretion disk and that the predicted visibilities were higher than the observed data. On the other hand, Malbet et al. (1998) used PTI for observations of FU Ori and found that an accretion disk model could explain the measured visibilities. Further characterization of the circumstellar material on size scales less than one AU can be achieved by extending the infrared interferometry observations presented here. PTI has a second baseline, which provides data on shorter spacings, and is equipped to observe in the H band, which probes higher temperatures and has higher spatial resolution than K band. We plan to extend our study of young stellar objects to include H band and more spatial scales. This work was performed at the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, Caltech and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Data were obtained at the Palomar Observatory using the NASA Palomar Testbed Interferometer, which is supported by NASA contracts to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Science operations with PTI are possible through the efforts of the PTI Collaboration (http://huey.jpl.nasa.gov/palomar/ptimembers.html). We particularly thank A. Boden for – 10 – his efforts in data reduction software and B. Thompson for useful discussions. We are also grateful to T. Beck for providing the T Tau flux ratio. DRC acknowledges support from NASA WIRE ADP NAG5-6751. EAL acknowledges support from a Research Corporation Innovation Award and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers to the University of Florida. REFERENCES Akeson, R. L., Koerner, D. W., and Jensen, E. L. N. 1998, ApJ, 505, 358 Beckwith, S. V. W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., and Gusten, R. 1990, AJ, 99, 924 Berger, J.P. 1998, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Joseph Fourier de Grenbole, France Bertout, C., Robichon, N., and Arenou, F. 1999, A&A, 352, 574 Boden, A. F., Colavita, M. M., van Belle, G. T., and Shao, M. 1998, SPIE proceedings, 3350, 872 Colavita M. M. et al 1999, ApJ, 510, 505 Corporon, P. 1998, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Joseph Fourier de Grenbole, France Ghez, A. M., Neugebauer, G., Gorham, P. W., Haniff, C. A., Kulkarni, S. R., Matthews, K., Koresko, C., and Beckwith, S. 1991, AJ, 102, 2066 Ghez, A. M., Neugebauer, G., and Matthews, K. 1993, AJ, 106, 2005 Herbig, G.H. and Bell, K.R. 1988, Lick Obs. Bull. 111, Third Catalog of Emission-line Stars for the Orion Population (Santa Cruz: Univ. California) Hillenbrand, L. A., Strom, S. E., Vrba. F. J., and Keene, J. 1992, ApJ, 397, 613 Koresko, C.D., 2000, ApJ, 531, 147 Malbet, F., et al 1998, ApJ, 507, 149 Malbet, F. and Bertout, C. 1995, A&AS, 113, 369 Marsh, K. A. and Mahoney, M. J. 1992 ApJ, 395, 115 Millan-Gabet, R., Schloerb, F. P., Traub, W. A., Malbet, F., Berger, J. P., and Bregman, J. D. 1999, ApJ, 513, 131 Millan-Gabet, R. 1999, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Mundy, L.G., Looney, L.W. and Welch, W.J. 2000, in Prototstars and Planet IV, ed. V. Mannings, A.P. Boss and S.S. Russell (Tucson: University of Arizona), in press – 11 – Natta, A., Grinin, V.P., and Mannings, V. 2000, in Prototstars and Planet IV, ed. V. Mannings, A.P. Boss and S.S. Russell (Tucson: University of Arizona), in press Skrutskie, M. F., Meyer, M. R., Whalen, D. & Hamilton, C. 1996, AJ, 112, 2168 Stapelfeldt, K. R. et al. 1998, ApJ, 508, 736 Wilner,D.J. and Lay,O.P 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A.P. Boss and S.S. Russell (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), in press This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0. Table 1. PTI observations Source # of nights Calibrators (records) < V 2 > Uniform diska (diameter) Gaussiana (FWHM) T Tau SU Aur MWC 147 AB Aur 4(119) HD 28024, HD 27946 3(38) HD 28024, HD 27946, HD 25867 HD 43042, HD 46709 HD 32301 9(121) 4c 0.29 ± 0.01b 2.62+0.046 1.92+0.063 0.68 ± 0.02 2.28+0.017 0.53 ± 0.01 < 0.15 −0.044 mas −0.059 mas −0.034 mas >3.7 mas 1.61+0.028 1.16+0.038 1.38+0.013 −0.031 mas −0.039 mas −0.014 mas >2.4 mas a1 σ uncertainties are given for the best fit Gaussian and uniform disk models. bThe visibility given for T Tau is the calibrated value uncorrected for the effects of T Tau S. cOnly nights with good upper limits are listed for AB Aur
astro-ph/9610103	1	9610	1996-10-15T01:25:50	Synthesis Imaging of Dense Gas in Nearby Galaxies	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present BIMA observations of the HCN emission from five nearby spiral galaxies. The HCN observations comprise the first high-resolution (5--10\arcsec) survey of dense molecular gas from a sample of normal galaxies, rather than galaxies with prolific starburst or nuclear activities. The images show compact structure, demonstrating that the dense gas emission is largely confined to the central kiloparsec of the sources. In one of the galaxies, NGC 6946, the ratio of HCN to CO integrated intensities ranges from 0.05--0.2 within the extent of the HCN emission (r = 150 pc), with an average value of 0.11 \pm 0.01 over the whole region; the range and average values of the ratios in NGC 6946 are very similar to what is observed in the central r = 250 pc of the Milky Way. In NGC 6946, NGC 1068 and the Milky Way, the ratio I{HCN}/I{CO} is 5 to 10 times higher in the bulge regions than in their disks; this suggests that the physical conditions in their bulges and disks are very different. In NGC 4826 and M51, as in the Milky Way and NGC 1068, there is a linear offset of \sim 100 pc between the dense gas distribution and the peak of the radio continuum emission.	astro-ph	astro-ph	To appear in The Astrophysical Journal Synthesis Imaging of Dense Gas in Nearby Galaxies Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Tamara T. Helfer1 and Leo Blitz1 ABSTRACT We present images of the HCN J = 1-0 emission from five nearby spiral galaxies made with the Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Association interferometer. The HCN observations comprise the first high-resolution (θ ∼ 5′′ -- 10′′) survey of dense molecular gas from a sample of normal galaxies, rather than galaxies with prolific starburst or nuclear activities. The images show compact structure, demonstrating that the dense gas emission is largely confined to the central kiloparsec of the sources. To within the uncertainties, 70 - 100% of the single-dish flux is recovered for each source; this implies that there is not a significant contribution to the HCN flux from low-level emission in the disks of the galaxies. In one of the galaxies, NGC 6946, the ratio of HCN to CO integrated intensities ranges from 0.05 -- 0.2 within the extent of the HCN emission (r = 150 pc), with an average value of 0.11 ± 0.01 over the whole region; the range and average values of the ratios in NGC 6946 are very similar to what is observed in the central r = 250 pc of the Milky Way. A comparison with single-dish observations allows us to place an upper limit of 0.01 on the ratio of integrated intensities in the region 150 < r < 800 pc in NGC 6946. In NGC 6946, NGC 1068 and the Milky Way, the ratio IHCN/ICO is 5 to 10 times higher in the bulge regions than in their disks; this suggests that the physical conditions in their bulges and disks are very different. Furthermore, the presence of dense gas on size scales of ∼ 500 pc in the centers of these nearby galaxies and the Milky Way suggests that the internal pressure is at least 107 cm−3 K in their centers; this is some three orders of magnitude greater than the pressure in the local interstellar medium in the Milky Way, and it is two orders of magnitude greater than the pressure from the self-gravity of a solar neighborhood giant molecular cloud. In NGC 4826 and M51, as in the Milky 1thelfer,[email protected], current address Radio Astronomy Lab, 601 Campbell Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 -- 2 -- Way and NGC 1068, there is a linear offset of ∼ 100 pc between the dense gas distribution and the peak of the radio continuum emission. We did not detect HCN towards three additional spiral galaxies. Subject headings: galaxies:individual (NGC 3628, NGC 4826, NGC 5194 (M51), NGC 5236 (M83), NGC 6946) -- galaxies:ISM -- galaxies:nuclei -- interstellar:molecules 1. Introduction Single dish millimeter observations of HCN and CS emission from nearby galaxies show that most spiral galaxies, not just starburst galaxies, have an appreciable amount of dense (∼ 105 cm−3) gas in their bulges (Helfer & Blitz 1993 and references therein). These observations are in good agreement with what is seen in the inner r ∼ 250 parsecs of the Milky Way, where strong, diffuse emission from CS (Bally et al. 1987) and HCN (Jackson et al. 1996) is observed despite the moderate star formation rates there. (HCN and CS trace gas densities of ∼> 105 cm−3 in galaxies; this is two orders of magnitude higher than the density required to excite CO.) The ubiquity of large-scale emission from HCN and CS over hundreds of parsecs in the centers of galaxies is surprising when compared with the known properties of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the solar neighborhood, which contain few and relatively small (∼< pc-scale) clumps of dense gas -- and these only where stars are actively forming or where stars have formed very recently (i.e. where there is a local source of pressure, not common to the GMC as a whole). In galaxies, single-dish millimeter wavelength beams typically cover tens to hundreds of GMC-sized diameters. As part of our program to measure the degree to which different galactic environments affect the properties of molecular clouds, we began a program with the Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Association (BIMA) interferometer to survey eight nearby galaxies in HCN emission in order to measure the distribution and amount of dense gas on size scales of individual GMCs or small associations of GMCs. We consider these galaxies to be "normal" since they do not have prolific circumnuclear starbursts or active galactic nuclei; however, like most spiral galaxies, these galaxies have low-level nuclear line emission (Ho, Filippenko & Sargent 1993). In this paper, we present the results of the BIMA survey. We also present a comparison of the HCN emission from one of the sources, NGC 6946, with its CO J = 1-0 emission (Regan & Vogel 1995). A comparison with the CO emission from the other sources will be the topic of a future paper. -- 3 -- 2. Observations 2.1. BIMA Observations The sources and their coordinates are listed in Table 1. The sources were selected from the single-dish survey of Helfer & Blitz (1993) as galaxies with strong CO emission that were also detected in HCN with a single pointing using the NRAO 12 m telescope. The data were collected with the BIMA interferometer (Welch et al. 1996), which then comprised 6 antennas, between 1994 February 15 and 1995 May 02; the observations included data from up to three array configurations. For each source, the receivers were tuned to the redshifted frequency of the HCN J = 1-0 transition (ν o = 88.61 GHz). The data were processed using the MIRIAD package (Sault, Teuben, & Wright 1995). The time variations of the amplitude and phase gains were calibrated using short observations of nearby quasars every ∼ 30 minutes; a planet or strong quasar was observed to set the absolute flux scale as well as to calibrate the spectral dependence of the gains across the IF passband. The digital correlator was configured to achieve a maximum spectral resolution of 1.56 MHz (5.3 km s−1). For some of the observations, there was an intermittent phase lock on one of the antenna receivers that was not discovered until after the observations; in these cases all baselines involving that antenna were eliminated from further data reduction. For each source, the calibrated data were smoothed to 21.1 km s−1 resolution, then gridded and Fourier transformed using natural weighting. The visibilities were also weighted by the inverse of the noise variance, which was determined from the system temperatures and from the gains of the individual antennas. We cleaned the maps using the standard Hogbom algorithm. Maps of integrated intensity were made by summing those channels with emission after clipping the channel maps at a 1 σ level. The beam sizes and noise levels of the final maps are listed in Table 2. The noise levels are somewhat underestimated relative to the formal uncertainties, since they were determined from the clipped moment maps. The absolute flux calibration in all maps is probably accurate to ± 30%. 2.2. Single-dish Observations of CO in NGC 6946 We have also used BIMA to image CO in the centers of three of the galaxies (NGC 3628, NGC 4826, and M83) with detected HCN emission. A fourth galaxy, NGC 6946, has been imaged in CO using BIMA by Regan & Vogel (1995). The CO emission, unlike the HCN emission (see below), is significantly "resolved out" in the interferometric images of these galaxies; it is therefore necessary to fill in the zero-spacing flux with a single-dish telescope. We are currently still making these measurements for the first three sources; we -- 4 -- therefore defer further discussion of the CO results for these galaxies to a future paper. In the case of NGC 6946, we measured the CO short-spacing flux with the NRAO 12 m telescope2 and combined these data with Regan & Vogel's BIMA map. We observed on 95 June 20 -- 21 in the newly implemented "on-the-fly" (OTF) scheme at the NRAO 12 m (Emerson et al., in preparation) and covered a region roughly 5′ on a side. We observed orthogonal polarizations using two 256 channel filterbanks, each with a spectral resolution of 2 MHz per channel. The data were gridded and a linear baseline removed from the resulting data cubes in AIPS; the data were then transferred to the MIRIAD package for further processing. Details of the single dish and interferometric data combination were very similar to those described in Helfer & Blitz (1995) for the case of NGC 1068. 3. Results We detected HCN in five of the eight galaxies: NGC 3628, NGC 4826, NGC 5194 (M51), NGC 5236 (M83), and NGC 6946; their images are presented in Figure 1 along with optical images from the Digitized Sky Survey.3 The spectra from the positions of peak HCN emission in each of the detected sources are shown in Figure 2. In each case, the HCN images show compact structure, with the detected emission confined to the central ∼ 500 pc diameter; the 5′′ -- 10′′ FWHM synthesized beam sizes correspond to linear resolutions of 125 -- 200 pc at the distances of the galaxies. While the HCN emission is compact, it appears resolved by the interferometer in each map. In order to investigate the effect of the lack of uv sampling at small spatial visibilities, we compared the integrated intensities measured with the interferometer to the single-dish fluxes of Helfer & Blitz (1993). Table 3 lists the integrated intensities measured at BIMA along with those measured at the NRAO 12 m and the fraction of the single-dish flux recovered by the interferometer. With the possible exception of M51 (see § 3.1), the interferometer appears to recover all the single-dish flux measured by Helfer & Blitz. This means that the maps shown in Figure 1 are a reliable representation of the distribution of the HCN emission, 2The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is operated by Associated Universities, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. 3Based on photographic data of the National Geographic Society -- Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (NGS-POSS) obtained using the Oschin Telescope on Palomar Mountain. The NGS-POSS was funded by a grant from the National Geographic Society to the California Institute of Technology. The plates were processed into the present compressed digital form with their permission. The Digitized Sky Survey was produced at the Space Telescope Science Institute under US Government grant NAG W-2166. -- 5 -- constrained of course by the usual limitation of the signal to noise ratios. Allowing for low-level, more diffuse emission detected at < 2 σ, we conclude that the HCN emission is confined to the central kiloparsec of the galaxies (it is perhaps slightly more extended in M51). The spatial extent of the HCN emission is in good agreement with what is seen in the Milky Way (Jackson et al. 1996) and in NGC 1068 (Helfer & Blitz 1995). 3.1. Individual Sources The galaxies in this survey were originally selected from a list of the brightest extragalactic CO emitters (see Helfer & Blitz 1993). The following are brief descriptions of the individual sources. NGC 3628 -- This galaxy is a member of the Leo triplet (along with NGC 3623 and NGC 3627). It is a nearly edge-on Sbc galaxy with a prominent and irregular dust lane. Its nuclear region contains a modest starburst (e.g. Condon et al. 1982, Braine & Combes 1992). The CO from NGC 3628 (Young, Tacconi, & Scoville 1983; Boiss´e, Casoli, & Combes 1987; and Israel, Baas, & Maloney 1990) is strongly peaked in the inner kiloparsec and has a similar extent and mass as that in the center of the Milky Way (Boiss´e et al. 1987). The HCN in NGC 3628 is resolved and appears elongated in the east-west direction. There is emission at the 2 σ level to the northwest of the central source that may be associated with gas further along the major axis. The HCN, CO and radio continuum centers of NGC 3628 all peak some 21′′ to the southeast of the optical nucleus; however, the optical nucleus is heavily obscured and its position is highly uncertain (Boiss´e et al. 1987). NGC 4826 -- This Sab galaxy has been called variously the "Black Eye," the "Evil Eye," or somewhat more optimistically (Rubin 1994) the "Sleeping Beauty" galaxy for its conspicuous dust lane (see Sandage 1961; see also the cover of The Astronomical Journal, 1994, 107, 1). NGC 4826 has gained notoriety recently for the discovery that the inner kiloparsec-scale disk is counterrotating with respect to the larger scale rotation of the galaxy (Braun, Walterbos, & Kennicutt 1992; Rubin 1994; Braun et al. 1994). The CO emission (Casoli & Gerin 1993) is confined to the inner r ∼ 1′. The HCN emission appears symmetric and centrally peaked in NGC 4826. NGC 5194 (M51) -- M51 is the prototypical grand design spiral and is one of the best studied galaxies in CO emission. Interferometric CO images of the nuclear region of M51 (e.g. Lo et al. 1987; Rand & Kulkarni 1990; and Adler et al. 1992; the last includes zero-spacing flux) show a notable lack of a single central concentration of CO, despite the strong molecular emission associated with the spiral arms in the nuclear region. M51 is -- 6 -- the only galaxy of the five detected in HCN at BIMA that does not have a strong central concentration of CO. In contrast to the CO emission, the HCN emission does appear to be centrally concentrated, though there is a significant contribution to the total flux from low-level (< 2 σ) emission. We note that Kohno et al. (1996) mapped the central concentration as well as more extended structure in their HCN map of M51 observed with the Nobeyama Millimeter Array. The linear extent of the low-level (< 2 σ) HCN emission in the BIMA map is somewhat larger than those of the other four galaxies studied here, and the interferometer may have "resolved out" a nonnegligible contribution to the total flux in this source (Table 3). For M51, the flux of structures larger than ∼ 18′′ is attenuated by ∼> 50%. NGC 5236 (M83) -- This well-studied source is a grand design, Sc/SBb spiral galaxy with strong circumnuclear star formation within the central few hundred pc (e.g. Gallais et al. 1991). The HCN emission is strongest at the position of the peak of the radio continuum emission (Condon et al. 1982; Turner & Ho 1994); the condensations to the east and to the south of the strongest HCN emission are also apparent in the radio continuum. The synthesized beam of the interferometer is quite elongated because of the foreshortening of the north-south baselines toward this low declination source. The north-south elongation of the HCN emission is therefore almost certainly an artifact of the observations. NGC 6946 -- This late-type, grand design spiral galaxy contains a moderate starburst (Turner & Ho 1983). Within the inner 1.5 kpc diameter, the CO in this galaxy has a non-axisymmetric, north-south distribution that has been interpreted as a bar (Regan & Vogel 1995 and references therein). However, Regan & Vogel (1995) combined new CO and K-band observations and showed that the CO traces gas on the trailing side of spiral arms; their observations are consistent with what is expected for the gas and stellar response to a spiral density wave rather than a bar. The CO peaks up strongly in the inner 300 pc diameter of NGC 6946. The HCN emission is detected in this region and is resolved and slightly extended in an east-west direction, with an additional elongation towards the northwest (there is a similar northwest extension in the CO map of Regan & Vogel 1995). We discuss this source more fully in the following section. 3.2. IHCN/ICO in NGC 6946 The ratio of the 3 mm integrated intensities, IHCN/ICO, may be used as a qualitative measure of the molecular gas density (e.g. Helfer & Blitz 1996). In order to determine any line ratio from interferometric measurements, one must first take into account the possibility that the flux measured with the interferometer is missing a significant contribution from -- 7 -- large-scale structures in the maps. In NGC 6946, the interferometer recovers all the single-dish HCN flux to within the errors of the measurement (Table 3). For the CO, the Regan & Vogel (1995) BIMA map recovered about half the single-dish flux; we therefore modeled the short spatial frequency visibilities from the NRAO 12 m data (§ 2.2) and combined these with the BIMA CO map. The CO distribution and flux in the resulting map did not change appreciably interior to r = 15′′; at larger radii, the most dramatic flux increases were distributed over radii from 20′′ -- 50′′, though the shape of the structures remained about the same. With the fully-sampled CO map, we can now make a legitimate comparison of the HCN and CO intensities for this source. To determine the ratio IHCN/ICO in NGC 6946, we convolved the CO map to match the resolution of the HCN image, and we converted both intensities to a main beam brightness scale (R TMB ∆v); the ratio was computed only for regions with detected HCN emission (IHCN > 2.5 σmom, or r ∼< 15′′). The resulting ratio map of IHCN/ICO is presented in Figure 3. Although the emissions from CO and HCN both peak at the center of NGC 6946, the distribution of the HCN/CO ratio is saddle-shaped, with the highest values to the east and west of the nucleus by about 7′′ (175 pc) and the lowest values to the northwest and southeast of the nucleus by about 5′′ (125 pc). At first, it seems surprising that the ratio does not rise monotonically to the central position. However, at the small size scales resolved by the interferometer (r ≈ 70 pc), the characteristics of individual molecular clouds start to dominate the distribution, rather than the integrated effects of dozens of GMCs. It may be that the small-scale ratio is dominated by local effects from individual clouds; this effect is seen within the central few hundred pc of the Milky Way, where the ICS/ICO ratio (Helfer & Blitz 1993) and the IHCN/ICO ratio (Jackson et al. 1996) look very clumpy and irregularly distributed. In the Milky Way, features like the Sgr A and B GMCs are characterized by relatively high values in the ratio maps. The average ratio over the extent of the HCN emission (∼ 12′′, or 300 pc diameter) in NGC 6946 is 0.11 ± 0.01, with a peak value of 0.19 and a minimum of 0.049. The range of IHCN/ICO in NGC 6946 is very similar to what is seen in the Milky Way by Jackson et al. (1996); on small scales within the inner few degrees of the Milky Way, IHCN/ICO ranges from 0.04 to 0.12, and the average over the extent of the HCN emission, or r ≈ 300 pc, is 0.08 (see below). We can compare the ratio we measure in the central 300 pc of NGC 6946 with those measured with larger apertures: the single dish ratios of IHCN/ICO in NGC 6946 are 0.063 ± 0.007 at a resolution of 24′′ (600 pc) (Nguyen-Q-Rieu et al. 1989; Weliachew, Casoli, & Combes 1988) and 0.025 ± 0.003 at a resolution of ∼ 1′ (1500 pc) (Helfer & Blitz 1993). Figure 4a shows this radial distribution of the average integrated IHCN/ICO ratio. It is -- 8 -- important to note that the points shown in Figure 4a represent the average ratios over the area enclosed at the radius r, i.e. that the plot represents the integrated ratios IHCN/ICO as a function of r. The monotonic falloff in the ratio with radius is simply a result of the confinement of the HCN emission to the inner r = 150 pc, while the CO is distributed over a much larger radius (there is detectable emission at least to r = 3.5 kpc, Tacconi & Young 1989). What is perhaps a more interesting quantity physically is the annular ratio measured as a function of radius; that is, if IHCN/ICO is 0.10 ± 0.01 measured as an average from 0 < r < 150 pc, what is the value of IHCN/ICO from 150 < r < 800 pc (where 800 pc is the radius of the NRAO beam in Helfer & Blitz 1993)? We can set an upper limit to IHCN/ICO in this annulus by comparing the BIMA data with the NRAO 12 m HCN flux. Since the BIMA measurement recovered 0.81 ± 0.17 of the single-dish HCN flux measured at the NRAO 12 m (Table 3), let us assume that 20% of the single-dish HCN flux is distributed at radii larger than the interferometer was able to measure, yet within the half power beam area of the the NRAO 12 m -- that is, radii within the annulus 150 < r < 800 pc. (This is a conservative estimate, since any "missing" large-scale flux could also contribute to the flux at the central position.) If we then measure the flux in the Regan & Vogel CO map from 150 < r < 800 pc, we find that the ratio IHCN/ICO in this annulus is at most 0.01. This ratio is an order of magnitude lower than that measured over the central r = 150 pc, as shown in Figure 4b. 3.3. Nondetections We did not detect HCN emission from NGC 4321 (M100), NGC 4527, or NGC 4569. While it is possible that the dense structure in these galaxies is so extended that the interferometer resolves out the single-dish HCN emission (for these sources, the flux of structures larger than ∼ 20′′ is attenuated by ∼> 50%), it is also likely that the observations simply were not sensitive enough to detect the HCN from these sources. For those observations which suffered from an intermittent phase lock (see § 2.1), the antenna that was flagged was one of the two that made up the shortest baseline pair; thus the calibration solution may not have been reliable and also the zero spacing problem may have been exacerbated for these observations. 4. Discussion -- 9 -- 4.1. The Radial Dependence of Dense Gas Ratios Spectroscopic studies of CS and HCN emission in normal external galaxies suggest that most spiral galaxies contain an appreciable amount of gas at densities of ∼> 105 cm−3 in their centers (Mauersberger et al. 1989; Sage, Solomon, & Shore 1990; Nguyen-Q-Rieu et al. 1992; Israel 1992; Helfer & Blitz 1993). The maps in Figure 1 show the distribution of that dense gas, namely, that it is confined to the central kiloparsec of the sources imaged. This situation appears to be very similar to that seen in the Milky Way, where widespread emission from the dense gas tracers CS (Bally et al. 1987) and HCN (Jackson et al. 1996) is found only within the central ∼ 500 pc diameter. What does the distribution of dense gas tell us about the physical conditions in the molecular gas as a function of its location in a galaxy? To investigate the physical conditions rather than the total gas content, we normalize the HCN to that of the CO and consider the ratio IHCN/ICO. If the kinetic temperature of the gas responsible for the cospatial HCN and CO emissions is about the same, then IHCN/ICO may be considered as a qualitative indicator of the density or thermal pressure in the gas. (Indeed, since the J = 1 state lies only 5.5 K above the ground state for CO and 4.3 K above ground for HCN, even rather cold gas has the energy to populate the J = 1 state for both molecules. It is the molecular density that is more important in determining the excitation. See Helfer & Blitz 1996.) In NGC 6946 (§ 3.2), IHCN/ICO is 0.11 ± 0.01 averaged over the central r < 150 pc, whereas we deduce an upper limit of IHCN/ICO ≤ 0.01 averaged in the annulus 150 < r < 800 pc, a region that includes the inner part of the disk. A similar radial dependence of IHCN/ICO is seen in the unusual Seyfert/starburst hybrid galaxy NGC 1068, where the ratio approaches 0.6 in the central r = 175 pc (Helfer & Blitz 1995), and the ratio falls off monotonically to about 0.1 at the large reservoir of molecular gas at about 1 kiloparsec from the nucleus. In the Milky Way, the ratio IHCN/ICO is about 0.0814 ± 0.004 averaged over the central r = 315 pc (Jackson et al. 1996); between 3.5 < r < 7 kpc in the plane of the Milky Way, the average ratio is ∼ 0.026 ± 0.008, and in solar neighborhood GMCs, we measure IHCN/ICO ratios of 0.014 ± 0.020 when averaged over ∼ 50 pc GMCs (Helfer 1995 -- and these are upper limits to the ratio averaged over several hundred parsecs). These numbers are summarized in Table 4. What seems apparent from these comparisons is that IHCN/ICO is a strong function of galactocentric radius -- or more precisely, that there is at least a bimodal distribution in the ratio in normal galaxies: the ratio at the center is substantially higher than elsewhere in the galaxy. Even though local effects can dominate on scales of individual GMCs (§ 3.2), 4See note c to Table 4. -- 10 -- the average ratio of dense gas emission is highest at a galaxy's center and drops at larger distances from the center. Furthermore, the general agreement between the ratios in the central ∼ 500 pc of NGC 6946 and the Milky Way suggest that the physical conditions in the centers of the two galaxies are similar. 4.2. GMCs in the High Pressure Environments of Galactic Bulges The measurement that the ratio IHCN/ICO is 5 to 10 times higher in the bulge regions of the Milky Way and NGC 6946 than in their disks suggests that the physical conditions of the molecular gas in the bulge and disk regions are very different. Furthermore, the presence of dense gas on size scales of ∼ 500 pc suggests that the internal pressure is very high in the molecular gas. Let us assume that the intrinsic line widths of the clouds are dominated by nonthermal, bulk motions as in local clouds, and that their intrinsic linewidths are ≥ 1 km s−1. Although we cannot model the density accurately with the observation of a single transition of HCN or CO, a simple LVG analysis of the line ratios suggests that a line ratio of IHCN/ICO = 0.11 implies densities of 104.2−5.2 cm−3 for gas at a kinetic temperature in the range TK = 15 -- 70 K. These densities are consistent with what is measured in the Milky Way bulge molecular clouds, where n(H2) ∼> 104 cm−3 (Gusten 1989). If we take the gas densities in NGC 6946 to be 104.6 cm−3 , then the typical kinetic pressure throughout the molecular gas is ρv2/k ∼ 1 × 107 cm−3 K. Spergel & Blitz (1992) considered the effects of the extended, hot coronal gas in the bulge of the Milky Way on the thin molecular layer that is embedded within it, and they argued that the pressure in the center of the Galaxy is two to three orders of magnitude greater than that in the solar neighborhood. How does such an extraordinary difference in the environmental pressure affect the properties of molecular clouds? In disk GMCs, the external pressure of the ambient ISM (∼ 104 cm−3 K) is small compared with the pressure from the self-gravity of a cloud (∼ 105 cm−3 K), and a source of "local" pressure (i.e., ongoing or recent star formation) is required to support any localized high-density clumps within the cloud. In the high-pressure (∼ 5 × 106 cm−3 K, estimated for the Milky Way from the X-ray measurements of Yamauchi et al. 1990) environments of bulge molecular gas, on the other hand, the GMCs need not be self-gravitating -- in fact, only the most massive clouds could have the Jeans masses required to be self-gravitating. In bulge clouds, then, it is the external pressure of the environment that dominates, and these high pressures can support the dense gas throughout the molecular component (regardless of whether there is any active star formation in the GMCs). These arguments are easily extended to observations of external galaxies, which -- 11 -- typically also have X-ray emission associated with their bulges (Fabbiano, Kim, & Trinchieri 1992). From our observations of HCN in the bulges of external galaxies, it appears that the physical conditions in molecular gas in the centers of galaxies are much more similar to each other than they are to local GMCs in the Milky Way. 4.3. Positional Offsets Between the Dense Gas and Radio Continuum Distributions In the Milky Way, there is a pronounced offset of ∼ 80 pc in the position of the peak radio continuum emission (Sgr A*, l = 0◦, b = 0◦) and the centroid of the dense gas (traced by CS and HCN) distribution (l = 0.6◦, b = 0◦). There is also evidence for an offset of ∼ 100 pc in NGC 1068 between the peaks of the HCN emission and the radio continuum emission (Helfer & Blitz 1995), and a kinematic analysis of the molecular gas suggests the existence of an m = 1 mode (i.e. a dipole asymmetry in the mass distribution) in NGC 1068. Whether it is the radio continuum emission or the molecular gas that traces the center of the mass distribution, the dynamical timescale of the offsets is brief (< 106 years). If the offsets are indeed ephemeral, and not a steady-state condition of the galaxies, then it is appropriate to look for a source of the instability that causes them. How common are such offsets between the peaks of the dense molecular gas distribution and the radio continuum emission in galaxies? We compared the positions of peak HCN emission with those of the peak radio continuum in our sample (Figure 1, Table 5). While three of the galaxies show a reasonable coincidence between the two positions, two of the five sources, NGC 4826 and M51, show significant offsets: in NGC 4826, the offset is 3′′.7 or 74 pc; in M51, it is 2′′.6 or 130 pc. (In M83, there is a 1′′.6 or 40 pc offset, but because of the elongated beams and extended distribution in both HCN and the radio continuum, the peak positions are less certain.) It appears that these offsets are a common feature in spiral galaxies. In this sample, two out of five detected galaxies have offsets; we have already mentioned the offsets in the Milky Way and in NGC 1068. In a recent study of the K-band morphology in 18 face-on spiral galaxies, Rix & Zaritsky (1995) found that about one third of the disks have significant m = 1 modes at 2.5 disk exponential scale lengths. It may be significant that the two galaxies in our sample that show offsets, NGC 4826 and M51, also share the characteristic that they have low-level nonstellar nuclear activity (both are LINERs; these are low-level active galactic nuclei, or AGN); the other three galaxies detected here (NGC 3628, M83, and NGC 6946) have low-level starburst activity -- 12 -- instead (L. Ho, private communication). A recent study by Ho et al. (1993) suggests that up to 80% of the 500 brightest galaxies in the northern sky harbor some kind of activity in their nuclei; of these, about half are classified as LINERs, and half are starbursts. It is surprising both that most spiral galaxies appear to show some kind of nuclear activity and also that the activity seems to be roughly evenly divided between stellar and nonstellar mechanisms. The offsets of the dense gas from the peak of the radio continuum in NGC 4826 and M51, as well as that in NGC 1068 (a galaxy with a more energetic AGN, but similar conceptually to the LINERs) may help to distinguish empirically the kind of activity that dominates in a given galaxy's nucleus. 5. Conclusions We have presented the results of a survey of HCN emission from eight nearby spiral galaxies made with the BIMA interferometer. These observations comprise the first high-resolution survey of dense (∼ 105 cm−3) gas from a sample of relatively normal galaxies, rather than galaxies with prolific starburst or nuclear activities. We imaged five of the eight galaxies in HCN: NGC 3628, NGC 4826, NGC 5194 (M51), NGC 5236 (M83), and NGC 6946. To within the uncertainties, the interferometer recovers all of the single-dish flux measured for each source in a single pointing at the NRAO 12 m telescope (Helfer & Blitz 1993); this implies that there is not a significant contribution to the HCN fluxes from extended emission in the disks of the galaxies. In all the galaxies observed, the HCN emission is confined to the central kiloparsec of the sources. We added zero-spacing data from the NRAO 12 m telescope to the BIMA CO map of NGC 6946 by Regan & Vogel (1995) in order to compare the ratio of HCN to CO intensities in this galaxy. The ratio IHCN/ICO ranges from 0.05 -- 0.2 within the central r = 150 pc; the average ratio over this region is IHCN/ICO = 0.11 ± 0.01. A comparison with single-dish observations allows us to place an upper limit of IHCN/ICO ≤ 0.01 in the annulus 150 < r < 800 pc in NGC 6946. The extent of HCN emission in NGC 6946, r ∼ 150 pc, and the ratio IHCN/ICO = 0.11 in this region are similar to what is observed in the Milky Way (r ∼ 250 pc, IHCN/ICO = 0.08, Jackson et al. 1996); this suggests that the physical conditions in the centers of these two galaxies are similar. Furthermore, in NGC 6946, NGC 1068, and the Milky Way, the ratios at the centers are 5 to 10 times higher than those in the disks of these galaxies. This result is consistent with an enhancement of two to three orders of magnitude in the pressure of the bulges compared with the disks (Spergel & Blitz 1992). It appears that the physical -- 13 -- regions in the centers of galaxies are much more like each other than the conditions in the center of a galaxy relative to its disk. In NGC 4826 and M51, as in the Milky Way and in NGC 1068, there is a linear offset of ∼ 100 pc between the dense gas distribution and the peak of the radio continuum emission. These offsets appear to be a common feature in galaxies and may indicate that their disks are non-axisymmetric. It may be significant that of the five galaxies imaged in HCN, NGC 4826 and M51 are LINERs, whereas the other three are starbursts. We did not detect HCN in three galaxies with positive single-dish HCN emission: NGC 4321 (M100), NGC 4527, and NGC 4569. It could be that the emission is extended enough in these sources that the interferometer resolved out any detectable emission; however, we cannot rule out the possibility that there was some intrinsic problem with the observations of these sources. We thank the referee, Paul Ho, for his careful reading and suggestions; these helped us to improve the manuscript. We thank Mike Regan for providing us with the BIMA NGC 6946 CO data, and we thank Darrel Emerson, Phil Jewell, Tom Folkers and the staff of the NRAO 12 m telescope for assistance with the OTF observations and data reduction. Luis Ho helped with the early stages of the BIMA observations. We thank Kotaro Kohno for kindly providing us with the NRO map of HCN in M51 prior to publication. TTH thanks Jack Welch for hospitality while visiting UC-Berkeley. This research was partially supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation, with additional support from the State of Maryland. -- 14 -- REFERENCES Adler, D.S., Lo, K.Y., Wright, M.C.H., Rydbeck, G., Plante, R.L., & Allen, R.J. 1992, ApJ, 392, 497 Bally, J., Stark, A.A., Wilson, R.W., & Henkel, C. 1987, ApJS, 65, 13 -- -- -- -- . 1988, ApJ, 324, 223 Boiss´e, P., Casoli, F., & Combes, F. 1987, A&A, 173, 229 Braine, J. & Combes, F. 1992, A&A, 264, 433 Braun, R., Walterbos, R.A.M., & Kennicutt, R.C. 1992, Nature, 360, 442 Braun, R., Walterbos, R.A.M., Kennicutt, R.C., & Tacconi, L.J. 1994, ApJ, 420, 558 Casoli, F. & Gerin, M. 1993, A&A, 279, L41 Condon, J.J., Condon, M.A., Gisler, G., & Puschell, J.J. 1982, ApJ, 252, 102 Fabbiano, G., Kim, D.-W., & Trinchieri, G. 1992, ApJS, 80, 531 Gallais, P., Rouan, D., Lacombe, F., Tiphene, D., & Vauglin, I. 1991, A&A, 243, 309 Helfer, T.T. 1995, Ph.D. Thesis, U. Maryland Helfer, T.T. & Blitz, L. 1993, ApJ, 419, 86 -- -- -- -- -- . 1995, ApJ, 450, 90 Ho, L.C., Filippenko, A.V., & Sargent, W.L.W. 1993, in IAU Symp. 159, Multi- Wavelength Continuum Emission of AGN, eds. A. Blecha & T.J.-L. Courvoisier (Dordrecht:Reidel), 275 Israel, F. P. 1992, A&A, 265, 487 Israel, F.P., Baas, F., Maloney, P.R. 1990, A&A, 237, 17 Jackson, J.M., Heyer, M.H., Paglione, T.A.D., & Bolatto, A.D. 1996, ApJ, 456, 91 Kohno, K., Kawabe, R., Tosaki, T., & Okumura, S.K. 1996, ApJ, in press Lo, K.Y., Ball, R., Masson, C.R., Phillips, T.G., Scott, S., and Woody, D.P. 1987, ApJ, 317, L63 -- 15 -- Mauersberger, R., Henkel, C., Wilson, T. L., & Harju, J. 1989, A&A, 226, L5 Nguyen-Q-Rieu, Jackson, J. M., Henkel, C., Truong-Bach, & Mauersberger, R. 1992, ApJ, 399, 521 Rand, R.J. & Kulkarni, S.R. 1990, ApJ, 349, L43 Regan, M., & Vogel, S.N. 1995, ApJ, 452, 21 Rix, H.-W. & Zaritsky, D. 1995, ApJ, 447, 82 Rubin, V.C. 1994, AJ, 107, 173 Sage, L. J., Shore, S. N., & Solomon, P. M. 1990, ApJ, 351, 422 Sandage, A. 1961, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies (Washington: Carnegie Institute of Washington) Sault, R.J., Teuben, P.J., & Wright, M.C.H. 1995, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, eds. R.A. Shaw, H.E. Payne, & J.J.E. Hayes, A.S.P. Conference Series 77, 433 Spergel, D.N. & Blitz, L. 1992, Nature, 357, 665 Tacconi, L.J. & Young, J.S., 1989, ApJS, 71, 455 Turner, J.L. & Ho, P.T.P. 1983, ApJ, 268, L79 Turner, J.L. & Ho, P.T.P. 1994, ApJ, 421, 122 Welch, W.J., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 93 Weliachew, L., Casoli, F., & Combes, F. 1988, A&A, 199, 29 Yamauchi, S., Kawada, M., Koyama, K., Kunieda, H., & Corbet, R.H.D. 1990, ApJ, 365, 532 Young, J.S., Tacconi, L.J., & Scoville, N.Z. 1983, ApJ, 269, 136 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. -- 16 -- Table 1. Sources Source α(J2000) δ(J2000) d (Mpc) a vLSR (km s−1) NGC 3628b NGC 4321 (M100) NGC 4527 NGC 4569 NGC 4826 NGC 5194 (M51) NGC 5236 (M83) NGC 6946 11h20m16.s27 12 22 54.80 12 34 08.80 12 36 50.02 12 56 44.25 13 29 53.30 13 37 00.23 20 34 51.91 ◦ ′ ′′ 13 35 39. 0 15 49 23.0 02 39 10.3 13 09 53.1 21 40 52.3 47 11 50.0 -29 52 04.5 60 09 11.9 9 17 20 17 5 10 5 5 847 1550 1734 -235 408 463 516 52 a vLSR is defined by the radio convention, vLSR/c = ∆λ/λo, where λo is the wavelength in the rest frame of the source. b Pointing center is the optical center of NGC 3628. The radio continuum center is some 21′′ to the SE of the optical center and is coincident with the HCN emission (see § 3.1). -- 17 -- Table 2. Mapping Details Source NGC 3628 NGC 4321 (M100) NGC 4527 NGC 4569 NGC 4826 NGC 5194 (M51) NGC 5236 (M83) NGC 6946 Beam (′′ × ′′) 4.7 × 4.1 8.2 × 6.5 13.5 × 10.7 5.5 × 4.2 10.5 × 8.0 7.9 × 6.5 12.5 × 4.1 5.9 × 5.0 K Jy−1 σmom a (Jy bm−1 km s−1) 8.13 2.91 1.07 6.85 1.87 3.03 3.03 5.31 2.0 2.1 3.6 1.0 3.2 1.5 3.6 1.7 aσmom is lower than the statistical noise in the integrated intensity ("moment") maps because emission below the level of the statistical noise in the channel maps was masked out in order to calculate the moment maps (see text). -- 18 -- Table 3. Comparison with Single Dish Observations Source NGC 3628 NGC 4826 NGC 5194 (M51) NGC 5236 (M83) NGC 6946 IBIMA a (Jy kms−1) 49.0 ± 17.5 39.0 ± 16.7 26.4 ± 10.5 103 ± 23 39.2 ± 5.5 b IKP (K kms−1) 1.5 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.2 Fractionc recovered 1.01 ± 0.36 0.93 ± 0.41 0.68 ± 0.27 1.18 ± 0.27 0.81 ± 0.17 a IBIMA from this study, corrected for primary beam effects from the BIMA interferometer and the NRAO 12 m telescope for comparison with IKP. b IKP from Helfer & Blitz 1993, corrected to main beam brightness temperature scale. c Fraction recovered = (IBIMA × K Jy−1 × θ1θ2/(71′′)2) / IKP, where θ1, θ2, and K Jy−1 are listed in Table 2. -- 19 -- Table 4. Differential IHCN/ICO Ratios Region Milky Way NGC 6946 NGC 1068a Bulgeb Diskd Local GMCs 0.081c± 0.004 0.026e± 0.008 0.014 ± 0.020e 0.11 ± 0.01 ≤ 0.01 -- 0.6 0.1 -- aHelfer & Blitz 1995 bMilky Way: r = 300 pc; NGC 6946: r = 150 pc; NGC 1068: r = 175 pc cJackson et al. 1995. We use their correction for HCN and CO emission at nonzero Galactic latitude. In their "aperture photometry", Jackson et al. smooth their HCN map to a spatial resolution larger than that of their CO map by a factor of λ(HCN)/λ(CO) in order to emulate the single-dish measurements of extragalactic ratios. This correction is not appropriate for comparison with our interferometeric measurements, in which the HCN and CO maps have been smoothed to the same resolution. We therefore "re-correct" their ratio so that it is appropriate for direct comparison to these results. dMilky Way: 3.5 < r < 7 kpc; NGC 6946: 150 < r < 800 pc; NGC 1068: 1.0 < r < 1.4 kpc eHelfer 1995 -- 20 -- Table 5. Offsets Between HCN and Radio Continuum Emission Source NGC 3628 NGC 4826 NGC 5194 (M51) NGC 5236 (M83) NGC 6946 ∆α, ∆δ (′′ × ′′) -0.5, -0.1 +2.2, -3.0 -2.2, +1.3 -1.3, -0.9 -0.1, -0.5 References for Radio Continuum Data: NGC 3628, NGC 5236 and NGC 6946: Condon et al. 1982; NGC 4826: Braun et al. 1994; NGC 5194: Turner & Ho 1994 -- 21 -- Fig. 1. -- BIMA images of HCN in (a) NGC 3628, (b) NGC 4826, (c) NGC 5194 (M51), (d) NGC 5236 (M83), and (e) NGC 6946. The left panel in each plot shows a 10′ × 10′ field from the Digitized Sky Survey around the center of each galaxy. The circle represents the BIMA primary beam size of 132′′ FWHM, and the white square shows the field presented in the right panel. The right panel shows the BIMA HCN image of each source. The FWHM size of the synthesized beam is shown in the lower left corner of each image, and the horizontal bar represents a linear size scale of 500 pc. The contour levels are ± 2,3,4... σmom, where σmom is listed in Table 2 for each source. The white cross marks the position of the peak radio continuum emission (see text). The images have not been corrected for primary beam attenuation. -- 22 -- Fig. 1. -- continued -- 23 -- Fig. 1. -- continued -- 24 -- Fig. 2. -- Spectra from the positions of peak HCN emission in (a) NGC 3628, (b) NGC 4826, (c) NGC 5194 (M51), (d) NGC 5236 (M83), and (e) NGC 6946. The abscissa is the radio-defined LSR velocity in km s−1, and the ordinate is main beam brightness temperature in K. -- 25 -- Fig. 3. -- Ratio of HCN/CO integrated intensities in the central r = 150 pc of NGC 6946. The halftone limits are (0.04,0.2). The lowest contour level is 0.06, and the contour interval is 0.02. The CO map used to construct the ratio map includes zero-spacing data from the NRAO 12 m telescope. -- 26 -- Fig. 4. -- (a) The integral ratio of HCN/CO integrated intensities as a function of radius in NGC 6946. The innermost point is the BIMA measurement from this study, the point at r = 300 pc uses data from the IRAM 30 m telescope (Nguyen-Q-Rieu et al. 1992; Weliachew et al. 1988), and the outermost point was measured using the NRAO 12 m telescope (Helfer & Blitz 1993). Each point represents the average ratio over the area enclosed at the shown radius. (b) The more physical differential or annular ratio as a function of radius in NGC 6946. The figure emphasizes the sharp boundary between the physical conditions in the r = 300 pc HCN-emitting region and those at larger radii.
astro-ph/0409587	1	0409	2004-09-24T14:11:30	Detection of hard X-ray pulsations and a strong iron K_beta emission line during an extended low state of GX 1+4	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present here results obtained from a detailed timing and spectral analysis of three BeppoSAX observations of the binary X-ray pulsar GX 1+4 carried out in August 1996, March 1997, and August 2000. In the middle of the August 2000 observation, the source was in a rare low intensity state that lasted for about 30 hours. Though the source does not show pulsations in the soft X-ray band (1.0-5.5 keV) during the extended low state, pulsations are detected in 5.5-10.0 keV energy band of the MECS detector and in hard X-ray energy bands (15-150 keV) of the PDS instrument. Comparing the 2-10 keV flux during this low state with the previously reported low states in GX 1+4, we suggest that the propeller regime in GX 1+4 occurs at a lower mass accretion rate than reported earlier. Broad-band (1.0-150 keV) pulse averaged spectroscopy reveals that the best-fit model comprises of a Comptonized continuum along with an iron K_alpha emission line. A strong iron K_beta emission line is detected for the first time in GX 1+4 during the extended low state of 2000 observation with equivalent width of ~550 eV. The optical depth and temperature of the Comptonizing plasma are found to be identical during the high and low intensity states whereas the hydrogen column density and the temperature of the seed photons are higher during the low state. We also present results from pulse phase resolved spectroscopy during the high and low flux episodes.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Detection of hard X-ray pulsations and a strong iron Kβ emission line during an extended low state of GX 1+4 4 0 0 2 p e S 4 2 1 v 7 8 5 9 0 4 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a S. Naik1, B. Paul2 and P. J. Callanan1 ABSTRACT We present here results obtained from a detailed timing and spectral analysis of three BeppoSAX observations of the binary X-ray pulsar GX 1+4 carried out in August 1996, March 1997, and August 2000. In the middle of the August 2000 observation, the source was in a rare low intensity state that lasted for about 30 hours. Though the source does not show pulsations in the soft X-ray band (1.0 -- 5.5 keV) during the extended low state, pulsations are detected in 5.5 -- 10.0 keV energy band of the MECS detector and in hard X-ray energy bands (15 -- 150 keV) of the PDS instrument. Comparing the 2 -- 10 keV flux during this low state with the previously reported low states in GX 1+4, we suggest that the propeller regime in GX 1+4 occurs at a lower mass accretion rate than reported earlier. Broad-band (1.0 -- 150 keV) pulse averaged spectroscopy reveals that the best-fit model comprises of a Comptonized continuum along with an iron Kα emission line. A strong iron Kβ emission line is detected for the first time in GX 1+4 during the extended low state of 2000 observation with equivalent width of ∼ 550 eV. The optical depth and temperature of the Comptonizing plasma are found to be identical during the high and low intensity states whereas the hydrogen column density and the temperature of the seed photons are higher during the low state. We also present results from pulse phase resolved spectroscopy during the high and low flux episodes. Subject headings: stars : neutron -- Pulsars : individual (GX 1+4) -- X-rays : stars 1Department of Physics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, [email protected], [email protected] 2Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005, India, [email protected] -- 2 -- 1. Introduction The luminous accretion-powered X-ray pulsar GX 1+4 has several unique characteristics which make it an ideal source for a detailed study in a wide X-ray energy band. The optical counterpart is a M5 III giant star in a rare type of symbiotic system (Chakrabarty & Roche 1997). The neutron star in the binary system is a slow pulsar with a spin period of about 2 minutes. It is one of the brightest and hardest X-ray sources in the sky with a large rate of change of pulse period. In 1970s, the pulsar exhibited spin-up behavior and after an extended low intensity state in early 1980s, it showed spin-down activity (Makishima et al. 1988). BAT SE monitoring of the source, since 1991, confirmed the spin down trend with occasional torque reversal events (Chakrabarty et al. 1997). Though the spin-up torque is expected to be correlated with the X-ray luminosity (Ghosh & Lamb 1979), they have been found instead to be anticorrelated for GX 1+4 (Chakrabarty et al. 1997, Paul et al. 1997a). The pulsed X-ray luminosity of GX 1+4 monitored with BAT SE, and the total X-ray luminosity monitored with RXTE-ASM, shows strong variability over days to years time scale, but without any periodic nature. The pulse profile of GX 1+4 has a characteristic dip, which has been attributed due to accretion column eclipses (Galloway et al. 2001). The dip is broad when the source is bright and it becomes narrow with decreasing intensity. In the hard X-rays, a change in pulse profile, from a single peak to a double peak with associated flux change was noted in GX 1+4 with balloon borne observations (Rao et al. 1994, Paul et al. 1997b). It occasionally shows a low state of a few hours duration (∼ 40 ks in July 1996) during which the pulsations are absent (Cui 1997, Cui and Smith 2004). This has been interpreted as due to centrifugal prohibition of accretion, also known as the 'propeller effect'. As GX 1+4 is spinning down in spite of a large accretion rate (the persistent X-ray luminosity is a few times 1037 erg s−1), the magnetic field strength of the neutron star is expected to be high, 1013−14 G (Makishima et al. 1989) although this is yet to be confirmed from spectroscopic measurements. Based on the fluctuation of the spin-up rate, Pereira et al. (1999) suggested a binary period of 304 days. The continuum energy spectrum of accreting pulsars is generally described by a model consisting of a power-law, which is known to be a signature of unsaturated Comptonization and a Gaussian function for the Iron Kα emission line feature. Iron K shell emission lines in X-ray pulsars are believed to be produced by illumination of neutral or partially ionized material in the accretion disk, stellar wind of the high mass companion, material in the line of sight, or in the accretion column. The spectral fitting to the phase averaged RXT E data, however, shows that the GX 1+4 energy spectrum is best fitted by a model consisting of an analytic approximation to a Comptonization continuum component and -- 3 -- a Gaussian component, attenuated by the neutral absorption column density (Galloway 2000). Pulse-phase resolved spectroscopy shows a significant increase in the value of optical depth τ during the dips. This reveals that the dip features in the pulse profiles are due to the eclipses of the emitting region by the accretion column (Galloway et al. 2000). In this paper, we present the results obtained from a detailed timing and spectral analysis of three observations of GX 1+4, made in August 1996, March 1997, and August 2000, with the Low Energy Concentrator Spectrometer (LECS), Medium Energy Concentrator Spectrometers (MECS), and the hard X-ray Phoswich Detector System (PDS) instruments of BeppoSAX in 1.0 -- 150.0 keV energy band. During a major part of the August 2000 observation, the X-ray flux was at a very low level, similar to a state previously seen with RXT E in 1996 July, but for a longer duration of about 30 hr. The BeppoSAX observation provides us with an opportunity to investigate the temporal and spectral properties of GX 1+4 during this extended low state over a much wider energy band and better energy resolution than before. In subsequent sections we give details of the three BeppoSAX observations, the results obtained from the timing and spectral analysis, followed by a discussion of the results. 2. Observations The observations of GX 1+4, used for the present study, were carried out with LECS, MECS, and PDS instruments of the BeppoSAX satellite in 1996 August, 1997 March, and 2000 August. The details of the observations with useful exposure times are given in Table 1. The MECS consists of three grazing incidence telescopes with imaging gas scintillation proportional counters in their focal planes. The LECS uses an identical concentrator system as the MECS, but utilizes an ultra-thin entrance window and a driftless configuration to extend the low-energy response to 0.1 keV. The PDS detector system is composed of 4 actively shielded NaI(Tl)/CsI(Na) phoswich scintillators with a total geometric area of 795 cm2 and a field of view of 1.3o (FWHM). The LECS, MECS and PDS are sensitive in the energy bands of 0.1-5.0, 1.0-10.0 and 15 -- 300 keV respectively. The energy resolutions of LECS, MECS, and PDS are 25% at 0.6 keV, 8% at 6 keV and ≤ 15% at 60 keV respectively. Time resolution of the instruments during these observations was 15.25 µs. For a detailed description of the BeppoSAX mission, refer to Boella et al. (1997) and Frontera et al. (1997). -- 4 -- 3. Timing Analysis GX 1+4 suffers heavily from absorption at soft X-ray energy bands by the intervening cold material. We have, therefore, used data from MECS and PDS detectors for the timing analysis. A barycentric correction was applied to the arrival times of the photons. It is not possible to correct the arrival times for the the binary motion as the key orbital parameters are not known yet. A circular region of radius 4′ around the source was selected to extract light curves from MECS event data. Light curves in the energy bands of 1 -- 10 keV and 15 -- 150 keV were extracted from the MECS and PDS data respectively with a time resolution of 1 s. During the 2000 observation, light curves from which are shown in Figure 1, high count rates were detected at the beginning and at the end, separated by an extended low intensity state of duration ∼30 hr. Near the end of this observation, there was a flare followed by a shallow dip. The two minute pulses of GX 1+4 were visible in the raw light curves. For accurate measurement of the pulse period, pulse folding and a χ2 maximization method was applied to all the light curves and pulse period was determined to be 124.404(3) s, 126.018(8) s and 134.9256(10) s during the 1996 August 18, 1997 March 25, and 2000 August 29 observations respectively. The quoted uncertainties (1σ confidence level) in the pulse periods represent the trial periods at which the χ2 decreases from the peak value by one standard deviation of the chi-sq values over a wide period range far from the peak. The pulse profiles, obtained from the MECS and PDS data of the three observations are shown in Figure 2. The pulse phases were adjusted so as to obtain the minimum in the pulse profile at phase zero. The characteristic narrow dips are clearly seen in the MECS pulse profiles of the 1996 and 1997 observations. The pulse fraction (defined as the ratio of the difference of maximum and minimum flux to the maximum flux in the pulse profile) in 1 -- 10 keV energy band (MECS data), during these two observations is in the range of 70 -- 75%. However, the MECS pulse profile of the 2000 observation is different. The dip seems to be absent and the pulse fraction is reduced to about 30%. Though the PDS pulse profiles of all three BeppoSAX observations look alike, the pulse fraction during the 2000 observation is less (∼ 50%) compared to the 1996 and 1997 observations (70 -- 80%). To get a detailed picture of the pulsation properties in this extended low state during the 2000 observation, we divided the light curve into three different regions as shown in Figure 1. Pulsations with profiles similar to those seen in the 1996 and 1997 observations were detected in the MECS light curves of regions 1 and 3, whereas in region 2, the 3σ upper limit of soft X-ray pulse fraction is 10%. However, pulsations are detected in all three regions in hard X-ray light curve of the PDS. The MECS and PDS pulse profiles of the three different regions are shown in Figure 3. -- 5 -- Figures 2 and 3 show a clear difference in the shape of pulse profiles of GX 1+4 in the soft and hard X-ray energy bands. The dip is narrow in soft X-rays and gradually becomes broader with increasing energy. To investigate the change in the shape of pulse profiles, we generated light curves in 16 different energy bands from MECS and PDS event files of the 1996 observation. The corresponding pulse profiles are shown in Figure 4. An increase in the width of the dips in the pulse profiles with energy range is apparent from the figure. It is found that the light curve above 100 keV is mainly background dominated and pulsations were not detected above 100 keV. Energy resolved pulse profiles from region 2 of the 2000 observation are shown in Figure 5. The pulse profiles in different energy bands of region 1 and 3 of 2000 August observation are similar to those seen in 1996 and 1997 observations. But, as mentioned previously, pulsations are absent or much reduced in 1 -- 5.5 keV energy band of region 2 of 2000 observation (Figure 5). A change in pulse shape is also noticed between the pulse profiles in 5.5 -- 10 keV (a double peaked profile with a pulse fraction of a mere ∼ 13%) and the same in the higher energy bands. 4. Pulse phase averaged spectroscopy For spectral analysis, we have extracted LECS spectra from regions of radius 6′ centered on the object for the 1997 and 2000 observations. The combined MECS source photons (MECS 1 was not operational in 2000) were extracted from circular regions with a 4′ radius. Background spectra for both LECS and MECS instruments were extracted from appropriate source-free regions of the field of view by selecting annular regions around the source. The software package named SAX Data Analysis System (SAXDAS) was used to extract background subtracted PDS spectra from the event files of all the three BeppoSAX observations. For spectral fitting, response matrices released by SDC in 1998 November, were used. A rebinning scheme (ftp://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/sax/cal/responses/grouping) suggested in the SAX data analysis guide was used to rebin the LECS spectra to allow use of the χ2 statistics. Events were selected in the energy ranges 1.0 -- 4.0 keV for LECS, 1.65 -- 10.0 keV for MECS and 15.0 -- 150 keV for PDS where the instrument responses are well determined. Combined spectra from the LECS, MECS and PDS detectors, after appropriate background subtraction, were fitted simultaneously. All the spectral parameters, other than the relative normalization, were tied to be the same for all the detectors. The spectra were first fitted to a model consisting of a power law continuum with a Gaussian for the iron line emission and absorption by matter along the line of sight, which yielded poor values of reduced χ2. Following this, we fitted the spectra with a model consisting of a Comptonized continuum along with a Gaussian function and interstellar -- 6 -- absorption and obtained better values for the reduced χ2. Addition of an absorption edge at ∼ 30 keV further improved the spectral fitting with a decrease in reduced χ2 from 1.1 to 1.0 for region-1 and 1.50 to 1.41 for region-3, whereas the region-2 did not show any improvement in spectral fitting with a reduced χ2 of 2.63. The edge energies and the absorption depth at the threshold are found to be consistent (within errors) for all three BeppoSAX observations. The residual around 35 keV can be fitted with either a cyclotron absorption feature or an absorption edge. However, as the magnetic field strength of the neutron star is estimated to be of the order of 1013−14 G, the cyclotron absorption line is expected at higher energies (> 100 keV). As there is no physical reason for the absorption feature at ∼ 35 keV, the absorption edge detected here is possibly an instrumental effect. But we note that with a similar analysis of the PDS spectrum of Crab, we did not detect any such feature. The equivalent width of the 6.4 keV iron Kα line was found to be in the range of 180 -- 320 eV during the 1996, 1997 and regions 1 and 3 of the 2000 observation. In the region 2, the equivalent width of the iron line was very high (∼ 2.9 keV) with significant line like residuals just above 7 keV. The region 2 spectrum, when fitted with the addition of another single Gaussian function gives a much smaller reduced χ2 of 1.72. We have considered if the second line detected most clearly in the region 2 spectrum of 2000 can be emission from hydrogen like iron as was found in an observation of GX 1+4 with the Chandra HETG (Paul et al. 2004). The 90% confidence limit for the centre energy of the second line detected in the MECS spectrum of 2000 region 2 is 7.10±0.05 keV. If we fix the center energy of the second line at 6.95 keV, (at which the second line is detected with a 3σ confidence level in the Chandra spectrum) for 65 degrees of freedom the χ2 increases by 10 compared to a line at 7.10 keV. We therefore conclude that the second emission line detected in the MECS spectrum is indeed Kβ line of lowly ionized or neutral iron. Following this, we have added the second line feature in the model for all the spectrum. The emission line at ∼ 7.1 keV, with an equivalent width in the range of 25 -- 80 eV is present in all BeppoSAX spectra of GX 1+4 except region 2 of the 2000 observation where it is very strong with an equivalent width of about ∼ 0.55 keV. A soft X-ray excess was detected in the residuals of the spectra from the 1996 and region 2 of the 2000 data. We tried various model components such as blackbody, disk-blackbody, and bremsstrahlung to fit this soft excess. However, addition of a bremsstrahlung component to the spectral model gives a better fit compared to the other two models for the soft excess with an improved reduced χ2 of 1.11 and 1.27 for 1996 and the region-2 of 2000 observation respectively. The integrated flux of the soft component in 1.0 -- 5.0 keV energy band for 1996 and region-2 of 2000 observations is estimated to be 1.12 × 10−12 ergs cm−2 s−1 and 4.7 × 10−13 ergs cm−2 s−1 which is ∼ 4% and 18% of the total model flux in above energy band -- 7 -- respectively. The 3σ lower limit of above two observations are 2.2 × 10−13 ergs cm−2 s−1 and 4.2 × 10−13 ergs cm−2 s−1 respectively whereas the 3σ upper limit of the soft X-ray flux during 1997, region-1 and region-3 of 2000 observations are 6.3 × 10−13, 4.1 × 10−13 and 1.6 × 10−13 ergs cm−2 s−1 respectively. We did not try the non-solar abundance for the soft component as it is seen only in 1996 and region-2 of 2000 observations and not in the others. Therefore, the detected soft excess in GX 1+4 is unlikely to be due to abundance anomaly. The spectral parameters with 3σ error estimates and the reduced χ2 obtained are given in Table 2. The region-2 spectrum along with the best fit model components and residuals without and with the iron Kβ line are shown in Figure 6. The unfolded spectra measured during 1996, 1997 and 2000 BeppoSAX observations are shown in Figure 7. 5. Pulse phase resolved spectroscopy Since the dip in the pulse profile of GX 1+4 shows significant energy dependence, pulse phase resolved spectroscopy may hold a clue to the origin of the dip. To estimate the change in spectral parameters during the dips, we have carried out pulse phase resolved spectroscopy during all the observations. The LECS and MECS spectra were accumulated into 10 pulse phase bins by applying phase filtering in the FTOOLS task XSELECT and SAXDAS software package was used to extract PDS spectra at the same pulse phases. As in the case of phase-averaged spectroscopy, the background spectra were extracted from source free regions in the event files and appropriate response files were used for the spectral fitting. The LECS, MECS and PDS spectra of region 1 of 2000 observation were added with the corresponding spectra of region 3 to improve the statistics. For the phase resolved spectral analysis, initially all the spectral parameters were allowed to vary. However, we did not find any systematic variation in the value of NH and iron emission line parameters with the pulse phase. We tried to fit the phase resolved spectra of all three BeppoSAX observations by freezing NH , the absorption edge and iron line parameters, which did not show any variation over pulse phase, to the phase averaged values. We included the Bremsstrahlung component to the spectral fitting for the 1996 and 2000 region-2 phase resolved spectra as it was present in the phase averaged spectra. It was found that the change in continuum flux with pulse phase in 2 -- 10 keV and 10 -- 100 keV energy ranges is consistent with that of the MECS and PDS pulse profiles respectively. We found a marginal change in the values of the input spectrum temperature kT0, plasma temperature kT and the scattering optical depth τ over pulse phase in three BeppoSAX observations. The results of 1996, 1997 and combined regions of 1 & 3 of 2000 observations are found to be similar. It is found that the results obtained from the phase resolved -- 8 -- spectroscopy of region-2 of 2000 observation are similar to that obtained by Galloway et al. (2001) e.g. an increase in the optical depth at the pulse minimum. 6. Discussion 6.1. Pulsations during the extended low state On several occasions, the accretion powered X-ray pulsar GX 1+4 was found to show a decrease in X-ray luminosity by an order of magnitude compared to the flux before and after such a state. The low state lasts for at least a few hours and can have rapid ingress to and egress from the low state within only about 4-6 hours (Giles et al. 2000; present work). Many short exposures with RXTE-PCA also found the source at a very low flux level, about an order of magnitude lower than usual, (Cui 1997, Cui & Smith 2003). During these low flux episodes, the pulsations were either absent, or the pulse fraction was reduced significantly from the usual 50-80%, often below the detection limit of RXTE-PCA. This has been interpreted as due to onset of centrifugal barrier or the propeller effect. With decrease in the mass accretion rate, when the inner radius of the accretion disk recedes beyond the co-rotation radius of the neutron star, this effect may set in. To compare the 2 -- 10 keV flux during the low-state reported here with the same during earlier reported low intensity episodes with the RXTE-PCA, when the pulsations became undetectable, we have reanalyzed the RXTE-PCA data of those observations. The 2 -- 10 keV flux measured from these observations are shown in Table 2. During the low state reported here, the absorbed X-ray flux in 2 -- 10 keV band was 2.9× 10−11 ergs cm−2 s−1 and is comparable to the earlier episodes when pulsations were below the detection level of the RXTE. However, we found that as the X-ray spectrum of GX 1+4 is very hard, the total X-ray luminosity in 10 -- 100 keV energy band during this state is more than an order of magnitude higher than that in the 2-10 keV band and pulsations are clearly detected in the hard X-rays. The spectral analysis of the BeppoSAX data showed that in the low state, the medium energy (2 -- 10 keV) X-ray flux is reduced by an order of magnitude, mostly due to an increase in the absorption. In comparison, the hard X-ray flux is reduced by a factor of two only. It was also pointed out by Cui (1997) from RXTE-PCA data that the X-ray spectrum is harder in the low state. Therefore, there can be significant flux in the hard X-ray band, where the effective area of the RXTE-PCA detectors fall rapidly. It is possible that the low states reported by Cui (1997) and Cui and Smith (2004) are similar to the one presented here. Only short exposures and decreasing hard X-ray effective area of the RXTE-PCA did not allow detection of the hard X-ray pulses in RXTE-PCA observations during the low states. In such a scenario, the propeller -- 9 -- regime for GX 1+4 may occur at a still lower mass accretion rate than that reported earlier. 6.2. Broad band X-ray spectrum and its changes during the extended low-state From the three BeppoSAX observations reported here, the pulse-phase-averaged broad band X-ray spectrum in both high and low states of GX 1+4 is found to agree well with a Comptonization model with additional components for absorption, line emissions, and in some cases, a soft excess. During the extended low state in 2000, the continuum flux in the 2 -- 10 keV decreased by a factor of ∼10 whereas the 10 -- 100 keV flux decreased only by about 50%. An intense iron emission line at 6.4 keV is clearly seen in the phase averaged spectra in both the high and low intensity states. In addition, a strong emission line at 7.1 keV was also detected in the low state spectrum, which was very weak during the high intensity states. The Kα line flux was about 3 -- 5 times larger than the Kβ line flux in all the observations and is consistent with the ratio expected for fluorescence emission from neutral iron. With a moderate energy resolution of MECS it is not possible to determine the exact ionization state of the reprocessing material. We have also examined changes of the two hardness ratios (1.0 -- 4.0/7.0 -- 10.0 keV and 4.0-7.0/7.0 -- 10.0) in the MECS energy bands during the BeppoSAX observation in 2000. The hardness ratios clearly show increased absorption during the low state. There was no significant spectral change associated with the intensity variations near the end of this observation. Although a similar low state of GX 1+4 was observed earlier, the event lasted for only about 6 hours and detailed spectroscopy was not feasible due to poorer photon statistics and lower energy resolution of the RXTE-PCA (Galloway et al. 2000). In this paper, we present the first detailed spectroscopy of GX 1+4 in this state. Though both the soft and hard X-ray flux decreased during the low state, the optical depth and temperature of the Comptonizing plasma are comparable (within errors) with those during the high intensity states just before and after the low intensity episode. The absorption column density is an order of magnitude higher during the low state. An increase in absorption may not be sole reason for the low state as the hard X-ray flux also decreased by about 50%, and the temperature of the seed photons increased during the low state by a factor of about two. However, the decrease in the hard X-ray flux may arise due to Thompson scattering from the line of sight if the absorbing material is partially ionized and the actual material in the line of sight is more than that measured with the simple absorber model. In the Comptonization model for X-ray pulsar spectra, the seed photons are likely to be produced -- 10 -- from a heated surface of the neutron star. If there is a spherical component of accretion, it may cause heating of the surface and these seed photons undergo Compton upscattering in the accretion column. An increase in the temperature of the seed photons during the low state also indicates that the low state is not only due to an increased absorption along the line of sight. There must have been some additional change in the accretion process, for example, and enhancement in the spherical component of mass accretion. Fluorescence emission lines with very high equivalent width similar to those found in GX 1+4 in the low state are seen in some persistent X-ray binary pulsars like Her X-1, LMC X-4 and SMC X-1 during their low-intensity phases of the super orbital period (Naik & Paul 2003; Naik & Paul 2004, Vrtilek et al. 2001). In these systems, the low-states arise due to increased absorption of the X-ray continuum by precessing warped inner accretion disk, resulting in a very large equivalent width. However, unlike these systems, in GX 1+4 the extended low state is observed intermittently, without any hint of a periodicity. The RXTE/ASM light curve of GX 1+4 does not show any periodic or quasi-periodic long term intensity variation as seen in Her X-1, LMC X-4 and SMC X-1. The difference in the duration and absence of periodicity in the occurrence of the low states of GX 1+4 rules out a similar mechanism for this source. 6.3. Spectral features of the absorption dip in pulse profiles of GX 1+4 Energy resolved pulse profiles of GX 1+4 obtained from BeppoSAX observations provide useful information towards understanding the accretion geometry of the binary system. The characteristic absorption dips are detected in wide energy range (1 -- 100 keV). The pulse profiles in narrow energy bands as presented here in this paper, show a gradual change with energy. An increase in width of the absorption dip with energy is clearly seen in all three BeppoSAX observations. These narrow and sharp dips have been attributed to the interaction between the accretion column and the emission region of the neutron star (Galloway et al. 2001). Partial eclipses of the emission region by the accretion column occurring during the spinning of the neutron star are reflected as dips in the pulse profile. The closest approach of the accretion column to the line of sight corresponds to the minimum intensity in the pulse profile. Similar sharp and narrow dips are observed in the pulse profiles of two other X-ray pulsars RX J0812.4 -- 3114 (Reig & Roche 1999) and A 0535+262 (Cemeljic & Bulik 1998). However, a gradual increase in the width of the absorption dip with energy is seen only in GX 1+4. A widening of the dip at higher energies may result from changes in the beam pattern with energy. Outside the dip, the high energy photons are typically those which have undergone many scatterings. Except -- 11 -- along the accretion column, where both the low and high energy photons are strongly suppressed, the high energy photons escape from the column preferentially at large angles, whereas low-energy photons are more isotropic. The emission geometry may change from a pencil beam at low energy to a fan beam at high energy. We have detected marginal evidence of spectral changes during the pulse phase in the form of a varying optical depth, plasma temperature and temperature of the soft seed photons. The pulse phase dependence of these parameters is not identical during different observations and the implication of the pattern of these variations is not clear. Acknowledgments We thank an anonymous referee for suggestions which helped us to improved the content of this paper. The Beppo-SAX satellite is a joint Italian and Dutch program. We thank the staff members of Beppo-SAX Science Data Center and RXTE/ASM group for making the data public. SN is supported by IRCSET through EMBARK postdoctoral fellowship. REFERENCES Boella, G., Butler, R. C., Perola, G. C., et al. 1997, A&AS, 122, 299 Cemeljic, M., & Bulik, T. 1998, Acta Astron., 48, 65 Chakrabarty, D., Bildsten, L., Finger, M. H., et al. 1997, ApJ, 481, L101 Chakrabarty, D. & Roche P. 1997, ApJ, 489, 254 Table 1. BeppoSAX observations of GX 1+4 Year of Observation Start Time (Date, UT) End Time (Date, UT) LECS Exp. MECS Exp. PDS Exp. (ks) (ks) (ks) 1996 1997 2000 August 18, 06:11 August 19, 03:38 March 25, 22:43 March 26, 16:08 August 29, 12:36 September 02, 03:38 -- -- 13 56.5 38.6 31.5 132 17.6 13.5 58.5 -- 12 -- Table 2. Spectral parameters for GX 1+4 during different intensity states Parameter 1996 August 1997 March 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August Region -- 1 Region -- 2 Region -- 3 1 NH kTBr (keV) T0 (keV) kTCo (keV) τ 21±2 0.36+0.12 −0.11 1.48+0.07 −0.06 13+0.4 −0.5 3.04+0.19 −0.14 1.1±0.1 -- -- 1.28+0.04 −0.05 12.7+1.2 −1.1 3+0.4 −0.3 1.37+0.05 −0.15 -- -- 1.62+0.04 −0.02 15.2+0.5 −1.6 2.38+0.38 −0.09 14.8+1.0 −3.4 0.26+0.06 −0.04 3.5+0.6 −0.4 12.6+1.9 −0.9 3.1+0.3 −0.5 2.4±0.1 -- -- 1.73±0.03 14.3±0.6 2.55±0.13 Iron Kα emission line FeE (keV)2 Line width (keV) Eqw. width (keV) Line Flux3 6.42±0.02 0.1±0.02 0.22±0.01 1.31+0.07 −0.10 6.45+0.03 −0.02 0.05∗ 0.19±0.02 0.85±0.08 6.49±0.03 0.12±0.06 0.24±0.03 0.77±0.09 6.47±0.01 0.05∗ 3.0+0.6 −0.3 1.08+0.21 −0.12 6.45±0.02 0.07±0.05 0.33±0.03 1.04±0.09 Iron Kβ emission line FeE (keV)2 Eqw. width (keV) Line Flux3 6.99+0.30 −0.05 0.06±0.01 0.38±0.08 7.06+0.10 −0.07 0.06±0.02 0.25+0.10 −0.08 7.1† 0.02±0.02 0.05+0.10 −0.01 7.10+0.02 −0.05 0.55+0.14 −0.09 0.23+0.06 −0.04 7.01+0.08 −0.09 0.08+0.04 −0.02 0.25+0.12 −0.07 Eedge (keV) Absorption depth Reduced χ2 33+1 −2 0.13+0.03 −0.05 1.18 (239 dof) 30±3 0.28+0.12 −0.11 1.08 (271 dof) 33+2 −3 0.19+0.11 −0.07 1.0 (168 dof) 32+13 −8 0.11+0.11 −0.06 1.27 (158 dof) 35±2 0.15±0.06 1.23 (168 dof) Model Flux4 2 -- 10 keV 10 -- 100 keV 2.4+0.3 −0.2 14.9+1.1 −0.9 3.2+0.5 −0.3 7.3+0.8 −1.1 2.07+0.34 −0.08 10.1+1.6 −0.3 0.29+0.08 −0.05 5.1+1.1 −0.9 2.01+0.13 −0.15 11.2+0.7 −0.8 The errors given here are for 90% confidence limit. 1 : 1022 atoms cm−2, 2 : Iron emission line energy, 3 : 10−11 ergs cm−2 s−1, 4 : 10−10 ergs cm−2 s−1 Fitted Model = Wabs (Br + CompTT + Ga1 + Ga2) Edge. Wabs = Photoelectric absorption parameterized as equivalent hydrogen column density NH , Br = thermal-bremsstrahlung-type component with plasma temperature kTBr, CompTT = thermal Comptonized component, and Ga1 & Ga2 = Gaussian function for iron Kα and Kβ emission lines. ∗ : Upper limit to the line width, † : Parameter kept fixed. 2 -- 10 keV flux during the low state observed in GX 1+4 with RXTE on various occasions are 1996 July 20 RXTE Observation (Giles et al. 2000) = 0.35 × 10−10 ergs cm−2 s−1 1996 September 25 RXTE observation (Cui 1997) = 0.40 × 10−10 ergs cm−2 s−1 2002 July 2 RXTE observation (Cui & Smith 2004) = 0.23 × 10−10 ergs cm−2 s−1 -- 13 -- Cui, W. 1997, ApJ, 482, L163 Cui, W. & Smith, B. 2004, ApJ, 602, 320 Dotani, T, Kii, T., Nagase, F., et al. 1989, PASJ, 41, 427 Frontera, F., Costa, E., Dal Fiume, D., et al. 1997, A&AS, 122, 357 Galloway, D. K. 2000, ApJ, 543, L137 Galloway, D. K., Giles, A. B., Greenhill, J. G., & Storey, M. C. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 755 Galloway, D. K., Giles, A. B., Wu, K., & Greenhill, J. G. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 419 Ghosh, P., & Lamb, F. K. 1979, ApJ, 234, 296 Giles, A. B., Galloway, D. K., Greenhill, J. G., et al. 2000, ApJ, 529, 447 Greenhill, J. G., Sharma, D. P., Dieters, S. W. B. et al. 1993, MNRAS, 260, 21 Makishima, K., Ohashi, T., Sakao, T., et al. 1988, Nature, 33, 746 Naik, S., & Paul, B. 2003, A&A, 401, 265 Naik, S., & Paul, B. 2004, ApJ, 600, 351 Paul, B., Rao, A. R., & Singh, K. P. 1997a, A&A, 320, L9 Paul, B., Agrawal, P. C., Rao, A. R., & Manchanda, R. K. 1997b, A&A, 319, 507 Paul, B., Dotani, T., Nagase, F., Mukherjee, U., & Naik, S. 2004, ApJ (submitted) Pereira, M. G., Braga, J., & Jablonski, F. 1999, ApJ, 526, L105 Rao, A. R., Paul, B., Chitnis, V. R., Agrawal, P. C., & Manchanda, R. K. 1994, A&A, 289, L43 Reig, P., & Roche, P. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 95 Vrtilek, S. D., Raymond, J. C., Boroson, B., Kallman, T., Quaintrell, H., & McCray, R. 2001, ApJ, 563, L139 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. -- 14 -- Fig. 1. -- The MECS and PDS light curves with time bin same as the spin period of the neutron star obtained from the 2000 BeppoSAX observation of GX 1+4. Fig. 2. -- The MECS and PDS pulse profiles of the source, of the three observations, are shown in top and bottom panels with 32 phase bins per pulse respectively. Two pulses are shown for clarity. -- 15 -- Fig. 3. -- The MECS and PDS pulse profiles of the three different regions of 2000 BeppoSAX observation (as shown in Figure 1) of GX 1+4. Fig. 4. -- The MECS and PDS pulse profiles of GX 1+4 in 16 different energy bands (as described in text) of 1996 August observation. -- 16 -- Fig. 5. -- The MECS and PDS pulse profiles of GX 1+4 in 12 different energy bands (as described in text) of region-2 of 2000 August observation. -- 17 -- Fig. 6. -- Energy spectra of GX 1+4 measured with BeppoSAX during the region 2 of 2000 August observation along with the fitted model (without iron Kβ emission line) and the residuals (middle panel). The presence of iron Kβ line is evident from the line like structure at ∼ 7.1 keV in the residual. Residuals obtained after including a Gaussian function at 7.1 keV in the model are shown in the bottom panel. -- 18 -- Fig. 7. -- The unfolded energy spectra of GX 1+4 measured with 1996 August, 1997 March, and three regions of 2000 August BeppoSAX observations.
astro-ph/0011206	1	0011	2000-11-09T18:36:18	Exploding and Non-exploding Stars: Coupling Nuclear Reaction Networks to Multidimensional Hydrodynamics	[ "astro-ph" ]	After decades of one-dimensional nucleosynthesis calculations, the growth of computational resources has meanwhile reached a level, which for the first time allows astrophysicists to consider performing routinely realistic multidimensional nucleosynthesis calculations in explosive and, to some extent, also in non-explosive environments. In the present contribution we attempt to give a short overview of the physical and numerical problems which are encountered in these simulations. In addition, we assess the accuracy that can be currently achieved in the computation of nucleosynthetic yields, using multidimensional simulations of core collapse supernovae as an example.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Exploding and Non-exploding Stars: Coupling Nuclear Reaction Networks to Multidimensional Hydrodynamics K. Kifonidis∗, T. Plewa†,∗ and E. Muller∗ ∗Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 1, D-85741 Garching, †Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18, 00716 Warsaw, Poland Germany Abstract. After decades of one-dimensional nucleosynthesis calculations, the growth of computational resources has meanwhile reached a level, which for the first time allows astrophysicists to consider performing routinely realistic multidimensional nucleosyn- thesis calculations in explosive and, to some extent, also in non-explosive environments. In the present contribution we attempt to give a short overview of the physical and numerical problems which are encountered in these simulations. In addition, we as- sess the accuracy that can be currently achieved in the computation of nucleosynthetic yields, using multidimensional simulations of core collapse supernovae as an example. INTRODUCTION Thermonuclear reactive flows are ubiquituous in astrophysics and occur in non- explosive environments as, e.g., in most (hydrostatic) stars as well as in explosive events, for which novae and supernovae are examples. Often they provide the en- ergy which powers stellar outbreaks (as in the case of novae, X-ray flashes, and thermonuclear, i.e. Type Ia, supernovae) and even for stellar explosions where this is not the case (as e.g. in core collapse supernovae, which are driven by neutrino heating), the strong coupling of hydrodynamic advection and thermonuclear re- actions is of utmost importance for the nucleosynthesis which accompanies these events. It is by a proper numerical modelling of this coupling through which a more detailed insight into the origin of the nuclear abundances in the solar system can be gained, which are themselves the result of a superposition of material which has been processed in explosive and non-explosive thermonuclear environments. By comparing the results of numerical models with the observed solar abundance pattern, on the other hand, one might also hope to learn more about the thermo- dynamic conditions in the otherwise unaccessible nucleosynthetic sites and events themselves. The high precision with which nuclear abundances can be measured nowadays poses great demands on the accuracy of the numerical models, especially since it was convincingly demonstrated in recent years that due to the importance of hydro- dynamic instabilities, rotation, and other effects, most of the nucleosynthetic sites do not possess spherical symmetry. Thus a reliable computation of the highly non- linear interaction of hydrodynamic advection and nuclear burning requires multi- dimensional numerical models. In the following sections we give a general overview of the methods which are currently employed for modelling thermonuclear flows and discuss some of the problems which are hereby encountered. Further reviews on reactive flow modelling can be found in [9], [10] and [11]. THE GOVERNING EQUATIONS A rather wide range of astrophysical reactive flows, in which relativistic effects, viscosity and magnetic fields can be neglected, is described by the well-known (reactive) Euler equations. This system of non-linear partial differential equations which expresses the conservation of the total mass, momentum, total (i.e. kinetic + internal) energy and baryons of the fluid reads ∂ρ ∂t + ∇ · (ρv) = 0 + ∇ · (ρvv) + ∇P = ρg + ρfadd + ∇ · ([ρE + P ] v) = ρv · g + ρ Qadd + ρ Qnuc ∂ρv ∂t ∂ρE ∂t ∂ρXi ∂t + ∇ · (ρXiv) = ρ Xi Xi = 1, X i (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) where ρ, v, E = v2/2+e, and P have their usual meanings, Xi is the mass fraction of nucleus i, and ρ Xi as well as ρ Qnuc are source terms due to nuclear transmutations. If self-gravity is important, the gravitational acceleration g = −∇Φ (6) which appears in the source terms of Eqs. (2) and (3) and which depends on the gravitational potential, Φ, has to be obtained from a solution of the Poisson equa- tion ∆Φ = 4πGρ. (7) In mathematical terms Eqs. (1 -- 7) describe a mixed initial/boundary value prob- lem due to the hyperbolic and elliptic nature of the Euler and Poisson equations, respectively. Given appropriate initial and boundary conditions, an equation of state relating ρ, P and e, and the additional source terms fadd and Qadd, which in general will be problem-dependent, Eqs. (1 -- 7) can be solved after an appropriate flow representation as well as a suitable numerical scheme have been adopted. FLOW REPRESENTATIONS AND NUMERICAL SCHEMES There are two primary approaches to solve the homogeneous part of the system of equations (1 -- 5). In the Eulerian framework the system of conservation laws is solved on a grid which is fixed in space and the evolution of the flow is followed by advecting the fluid through the computational cells. The principal assets of this method are its straightforward extension from one to two or three spatial dimensions and the simplicity of its implementation on serial and parallel computer architectures. If an appropriate shock-capturing, finite-volume numerical scheme is used, it is equally straightforward to obtain strict numerical conservation of all physically conserved quantities and a sharp resolution of shocks. The major drawback is numerical diffusion. Consider the continuity equation (1) in its Eulerian form, which can be written as ∂ρ ∂t + v · ∇ρ + ρ∇ · v = 0, (8) where the second term describes advection and the third term compression. Nu- merical diffusion is introduced into a numerical solution of this equation as a result of discretization errors of the v · ∇ operator. There appears to be a simple remedy to this problem: using the comoving derivative d/dt = ∂/∂t + v · ∇ we can rewrite Eq. (8) in the frame comoving with the matter to obtain its Lagrangian form dρ dt + ρ∇ · v = 0. (9) Note that in this frame the advection term v · ∇ρ has vanished. Therefore the Lagrangian approach is (in principle) not prone to numerical diffusion of mass (or composition). In Lagrangian methods each cell of the numerical grid represents a discretized fluid element which evolves subject to forces which are due to interac- tions with its neighbors and the time rate of change of the density of such a fluid element is solely determined by the compression (or expansion) that it experiences. Density interfaces (contact discontinuities) as well as composition discontinuities can be easily aligned with the boundaries of grid cells and do not have to be ad- vected through the grid in the course of the calculation. While this very desirable property of the Lagrangian approach has made it the method of choice for one-dimensional nucleosynthesis calculations, considerable dif- ficulties are experienced when Lagrangian schemes are applied to multidimensional flows. Shear and vortices can severely distort a Lagrangian grid. The discrete ap- proximation of differential operators over such a grid results in large errors in the 80 60 40 20 ) s e n o Z ( h t i d W 0 0 Donor Cell Godunov Lax-Wendroff PPM SADIE PPM (without detection) 200 400 600 Distance (Zones) FIGURE 1. Comparison of the diffusivity of different advection schemes for the problem of the propagation of a contact discontinuity through an Eulerian grid. The curves give the width of the discontinuity (in grid zones) as a function of the number of zones it has propagated through the grid (adapted from [4] and [5]). numerical derivatives, and in the extreme case that the grid lines cross (grid tan- gling) the calculations have to be stopped. Some remapping procedure to a new, more regular grid must then be applied which unavoidably introduces numerical diffusion to the solution. The distortion problem can be overcome if triangular instead of quadrilateral grids are used [11] or if (as in the Smoothed Particle Hy- drodynamics, or SPH approach) no grid at all is adopted and instead the flow is sampled by a finite number of particles. In the former method considerable logic overhead is added in restructuring the deformed triangular grid, while in the latter case, due to the Monte-Carlo nature of the sampling, Poisson noise is introduced. Due to the aforementioned drawbacks and due to significant progress in the de- velopment of accurate Eulerian schemes in the early 1980's, Lagrangian methods employing quadrilateral or triangular grids have not been used extensively in mul- tidimensional calculations of astrophysical flows (see [18], [12] as well as [11] and the references therein for examples). On the other hand, the simplicity of SPH has made this method very popular for astrophysical (especially cosmological) sim- ulations. Without attempting to escalate the very vigorous discussion, whether SPH or grid-based Eulerian schemes are to be prefered in astrophysical calcula- tions (see e.g. [10]), we will argue below that, due to its Monte-Carlo nature, the SPH scheme appears to be rather unsuited for multidimensional nucleosynthesis calculations, especially in cases where hydrodynamic instabilities are known to be important. Among Eulerian schemes, the so-called shock-capturing schemes have proven to be the most accurate ones for problems which involve discontinuities in the flow as shock waves (see [19] for details). The latter are very frequently encountered in explosive events, since in these cases the flows can attain supersonic speeds. Shock- capturing schemes derive their accuracy from a discretization of the hydrodynamic equations which closely mimics the physics of compressible flows by making use of the Riemann problem, i.e. the dissolution of an arbitrary flow discontinuity into a set of simple waves (shocks, contact discontinuities and rarefaction waves). Suitably constructed Riemann problems at the interfaces between adjacent computational cells are solved within each time step, from which the complete solution of the system of conservation laws is constructed. This allows one to avoid the use of large amounts of artificial viscosity in order to obtain a well-behaved numerical scheme in the vicinity of shocks. One of the most accurate shock-capturing schemes, which has been widely applied in astrophysics, is the (direct Eulerian) PPM scheme of [3], a second order extension of Godunov's original (and rather diffusive) first- order shock-capturing scheme [6]. In addition to its accurate treatment of shocks PPM includes a special detection and steepening algorithm to minimize numerical diffusion across contact discontinuities. The superiority of shock-capturing schemes in computing compressible flows has in [19], and their performance for computing reactive as- been demonstrated e.g. trophysical flows was studied in [4] and [13]. Fig. 1 shows a representative result from [4] in which PPM was compared to a number of older Eulerian schemes which were in wide-spread use until the mid 1980's. The figure shows the width of a contact discontinuity as a function of the number of zones that it has travelled across a numerical grid. Most Eulerian schemes tend to smear such fluid (and also composition) interfaces without limit, i.e. the width of the "discontinuity" tends to grow with time. Of all the schemes investigated, only PPM maintained a sharp res- olution of the interface within two zones. Still however, numerical diffusion cannot be completely avoided in Eulerian calculations and its minimization necessitates an adequate spatial resolution in addition to an excellent advection scheme. This has led to the development of adaptive mesh refinement methods [1], which concentrate the computational effort in critical regions of the flow and thereby often allow for substantial savings in computer time. ADDITIONAL PHYSICS While the numerical problems encountered in solving the homogeneous part of the Euler equations are difficult to overcome, they represent only a part of the computational difficulties for a realistic simulation. The source terms, which are usually taken into account using the operator splitting technique [9], often require much more computer time than the solution of the hydrodynamic equations them- selves. This holds, e.g. if large nuclear networks need to be evolved with the hydrodynamics or transport processes need to be taken into account (as e.g. neu- trino transport in core collapse supernovae, see [15] and the references therein and A. Burrows, this volume). In some cases even phenomenological (sub-grid) models might have to be introduced. This is e.g. the case for turbulent combustion in ther- monuclear supernovae, where a white dwarf is incinerated by a deflagration front whose propagation speed is impossible to compute in a direct simulation since this would require a resolution of the turbulent energy cascade down to the dissipation length scale [16]. Exacerbating the situation is the fact that stellar models, which serve as initial data for supernova simulations, might be affected by considerable uncertainties. In the absence of computational schemes and resources which al- low for a consistent multidimensional treatment of stellar convection and rotation over stellar evolutionary time scales, one is forced to describe these phenomena by one-dimensional appoximations (see the contribution of N. Langer, this volume). Finally, uncertainties in nuclear reaction rates enter the calculations. It is apparent that progress in only a single of the involved fields is not going to improve the accuracy of the desired nucleosynthetic yields considerably. In fact, a concerted effort in all areas appears to be required, since, as we will show in our example below, the different effects can conspire in falsifying the nucleosynthetic yields. CORE COLLAPSE SUPERNOVAE: A CASE STUDY Nucleosynthesis in core collapse supernovae is a good example for illustrating the aforementioned problems and we will start with a discussion of numerical diffusion using results of simple one-dimensional calculations. We subsequently address the complications introduced by convection in multidimensional calculations as well as by "additional physics", i.e. neutronization due to neutrino matter interactions. Finally we show how a multidimensional numerical failure, the so-called "odd- even-decoupling" phenomenon, an instability which appears to plague most shock- capturing schemes and whose effects have not yet been discussed extensively in the numerical astrophysics literature, can enhance neutronization by strengthening hydrodynamic convection and affect the nucleosythetic yields in multidimensional simulations. Nucleosynthesis in a 15 M⊙ star (1D) In core collapse supernovae nucleosynthesis is triggered by a shock wave which forms after the collapse of the iron core of a massive star has proceeded to supranu- clear densities. The shock, while initially powerful, stalls after a few milliseconds due to the energy losses from which it suffers while propagating through the outer iron core, but eventually ejects the outer stellar layers if heating by neutrinos from the collapsed core is able to overcompensate for the energy losses. In most nu- cleosynthesis calculations, however, these processes are not modelled in detail and instead a shock is initiated by simply depositing the typical observed supernova energy of ∼ 1051 erg near the center of a presupernova model. FIGURE 2. Left: Eulerian PPM calculation of explosive nucleosynthesis in the presupernova model of [20] using an α-nucleus network and the Consistent Multifluid Advection scheme (CMA) (from [13]). Right: Comparison of Eulerian PPM results using: 1st order advection for nuclear species (top), the FMA advection scheme for multifluid flows of [4] (middle), and the CMA scheme of [13] (bottom). Note the decreasing amount of diffusion and the sharp interfaces obtained with CMA (from [13]). In the left panels of Fig. 2 we show snapshots of the mass fractions from the first 500 ms of such a calculation, focusing on the silicon-rich layers just outside the iron core in which explosive nucleosynthesis takes place. Only 100 ms after the start of the calculations explosive silicon burning has frozen out and has left behind a significant abundance of 56Ni as well as 40Ca, 36Ar and 32S. Particularly noteworthy for the following discussion is the nucleus 44Ti. From one-dimensional Lagrangian nucleosynthesis calculations [17], [21] it is known that this isotope should be primar- ily synthesized in the innermost stellar layers which experience an α-rich freezeout. However, in the present Eulerian calculation a significant abundance of 44Ti has formed in zones with mass coordinates around 1.36 M⊙ (marked with arrows in the left panels of Fig. 2), i.e. at the interface of the regions enriched in 4He and 40Ca. This 44Ti "bump" results from the reaction 40Ca(α, γ)44Ti and the amount FIGURE 3. Final 44Ti yield of the one-dimensional calculations shown in Fig. 2 as a function of radial resolution and different multifluid advection schemes. Top curve: 1st order species advection. Middle: FMA. Bottom: CMA (from [13]). of 44Ti thereby produced is very sensitive to numerical diffusion in this region. Consequently, the strength of the 44Ti "bump" varies with the diffusivity of the numerical scheme which is used to advect the nuclear species. This is illustrated in the right panels of Fig. 2. The top right panel depicts results from a calculation with Godunov's first-order scheme. In this case, all mass fraction profiles are heavily smeared due to strong diffusion, as can be seen by a comparison to the middle right and bottom right panels which show results that were obtained with the FMA and CMA advection schemes of [4] and [13], respectively. Of all these schemes, CMA is the least diffusive since it is the only method which includes a detection and steep- ening algorithm for composition interfaces which was derived from PPM's original detection and steepening algorithm for contact discontinuities. Note the size of the 44Ti bump for the three different runs. The more diffusive schemes produce much more 44Ti. This is also illustrated in Fig. 3 which summarizes how the 44Ti yield depends on the adopted advection scheme and the spatial resolution. While the CMA results (bottom curve) are already converged for a resolution of ∆r = 40 km, FMA (middle curve) needs a resolution of about 10 km. The first-order scheme (top curve) would need much finer zoning than ∆r = 5 km to yield results of comparable quality. Note also that, if a diffusive advection scheme and coarse resolution are used, the errors might be as large as a factor of four! It should be pointed out, however, that 44Ti is a somewhat extreme (though very important) example. The (relative) errors due to numerical diffusion are usually smaller for the more abundant nuclei. This is illustrated in Fig. 4 which shows the dependence of the yields of different α-nuclei on resolution in a 1D calculation from [8], in which no ad hoc energy deposition was adopted, but where the shock revival phase was followed in detail by including the effects of neutrino heating from a central light bulb neutrino source [7]. It can be seen from this figure that FIGURE 4. Accuracy of various elemental yields from one-dimensional shock-revival and explo- sive nucleosynthesis calculations in the post-bounce model of [2] (see also [20] for the presupernova model). The logarithm of the deviations of the elemental yields of various α-nuclei as compared to an essentially converged 6400 zone calculation (∆r ≤ 5 km) is displayed as a function of the radial resolution (in grid zones)(from [8]). individual elemental yields are more accurate than the 44Ti yield by more than an order of magnitude. However, if one is aiming at a numerical accuracy of about 1% for all yields, about 3000 radial zones are required for this calculation. This amount of spatial resolution makes accurate multidimensional simulations very expensive. Convection and 56Ni synthesis in core collapse supernovae Neutrino matter interactions play a crucial role in the explosion of core collapse supernovae. They heat the matter behind the stalling shock and thereby trigger the explosion. On the other hand they determine the electron fraction per baryon, Ye, (or equivalently the ratio of protons to neutrons) in the ejecta and thus influence the nucleosynthetic yields. If the Ye value of material that has been photodissociated by the shock is significantly reduced below 0.5 by neutrino/matter interactions, this matter will recombine mainly to neutron-rich nuclei after expanding and cooling. In that case nuclei with Z = N like 56Ni will not form in the ejecta. Fig. 5 which shows results of a two-dimensional simulation of shock revival illustrates this effect. In this calculation the luminosities of νe and ¯νe were such that ¯νe absorption on protons was favored against νe absorption on neutrons and thus the heated gas was neutronized [7]. The sharp division between this material which is visible in the bubbles behind the shock in Fig. 5 and the lepton-rich material farther out which has formed 56Ni (the region enclosed by the white contour line in Fig. 5) is clearly visible. The negative entropy gradient that the heating has imprinted on the layers between the radius of maximum neutrino heating (close to the center) and the shock farther out, has also led to strong convective motions: bubbles of heated FIGURE 5. Distribution of the entropy (in units of kB/nucl.) 320 ms after core bounce in a two-dimensional core collapse supernova simulation of a 15 M⊙ star. The white contour line encloses the region in which the 56Ni mass fraction exceeds 20% (from [8]). deleptonized gas rise toward the shock while lower entropy flux tubes transport lepton-rich matter to deeper layers where it interacts with the neutrino fluxes much more efficiently. This interplay of convection and deleptonization is crucial for the 56Ni yield. The shock is only able to heat a certain amount of lepton-rich material to temperatures in excess of the 5 × 109 K which are required for 56Ni synthesis. If convection is strong enough to advect significant amounts of this matter close to the neutron star, where the gas will experience deleptonization, the 56Ni yield will be lower than in a model with no or weak convection. Multidimensional numerical failures: Odd-even decoupling Quirk [14] has reported on a subtle flaw in a number of shock capturing schemes which becomes evident when calculating multidimensional flows with strong, grid- aligned shocks. He has dubbed this failure the "odd-even decoupling" phenomenon. The problem shows up only if a sufficiently strong shock is either fully or nearly aligned with one of the coordinate directions of the grid, and if, in addition, the flow is slightly perturbed. This can be due to either perturbations intentionally introduced in order to study physical instabilities, as it is done in all studies of convection in supernovae, or due to perturbations caused by other flow features. Many Riemann solvers show the tendency to allow these perturbations to grow without limit along the shock surface, thus triggering a strong rippling of the shock front as well as the post shock state. In supernova simulations these perturbations, whose amplitudes can exceed those of the seed perturbations by several orders of magnitude, enhance the growth of hydrodynamic instabilities. In case of neutrino driven convection they lead to large-scale overturn and angular wavelengths of con- vective bubbles which are significantly larger than in a "clean" calculation. This FIGURE 6. Top: Entropy distribution 208 ms after core bounce (in units of kB/nucl.) in a two-dimensional supernova model showing odd-even decoupling. Bottom: Entropy distribution for an equivalent calculation in which odd-even decoupling has been suppressed (from [8]). artificial enhancement of convection is demonstrated in Fig. 6 where the entropy distribution of a simulation exhibiting odd-even decoupling (top panel) is compared to one in which the numerical failure has been cured (bottom panel). A modifi- cation of PPM's original dissipation algorithms [3] was necessary for this purpose. Alternatively the hybrid Riemann solver method of [14] might be used. Note that the calculations have been carried out in spherical coordinates (r, θ) so that the (initially spherical) shock wave was fully aligned with the grid. However, cylindri- cal coordinates which have been used for plotting are indicated in the figures. The difference in the final 56Ni yield for these two simulations was about 40%, the cal- culation not exhibiting odd-even decoupling showing the larger yield, as expected from our discussion in the previous section. This demonstrates that due to the strong coupling of neutrino physics and convection, the 56Ni yield in multidimen- sional calculations is much more difficult to calculate correctly than in one spatial dimension. Therefore the error of at most a few percent which can be deduced for the latter case from Fig. 4 can be deceptive. The results shown in Fig. 6 also suggest that numerical noise, whatever its origin is, leads to a grossly overestimated efficiency of convection. Thus, schemes which are known to suffer from this prob- lem (like SPH) do not appear to be suited for nucleosynthesis calculations in core collapse supernovae. CONCLUSIONS Realistic nucleosynthesis calculations in astrophysical contexts represent a chal- lenge in many respects. The difficulties involve the numerical treatment of multidi- mensional hydrodynamic advection, complex physics in addition to hydrodynamics and burning, disparate length and time scales, realistic initial conditions and uncer- tainties in reaction rates. It is our conviction, that substantial efforts are required in each of these fields in order to obtain reliable yields in multidimensional nucle- osynthesis calculations. REFERENCES 1. Berger, M., and Colella, P., Jour. of Comp. Phys., 82, 64 (1989). 2. Bruenn S. W., Nuclear Physics in the Universe, Bristol: IOP, 1993, p.31 3. Colella, P., and Woodward, P. R., Jour. of Comp. Phys., 54, 174 (1984). 4. Fryxell B., Muller E., and Arnett W. D., MPA Preprint, 449, 1 (1989). 5. Fryxell B., Muller E., and Arnett W. D., ApJ, 367, 619 (1991). 6. Godunov S. K., Mat. Sb., 47, 271 (1959). 7. Janka H.-T., and Muller E., A&A, 306, 167 (1996). 8. Kifonidis K., PhD thesis, Technische Universitat Munchen, (2000). 9. LeVeque R. J., Computational Methods for Astrophysical Fluid Flow, Berlin: Springer, 1998, pp. 84-101 10. Muller E., Computational Methods for Astrophysical Fluid Flow, Berlin: Springer, 1998, pp. 463-480 11. Oran, E. S., and Boris, J. P., Numerical Simulation of Reactive Flow, New York: Elsevier, 1987, ch. 10, pp. 358-394. 12. Pen, U.-L., ApJS, 115, 19 (1998). 13. Plewa T., and Muller E., A&A, 342, 179 (1999). 14. Quirk J. J., Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 18, 555 (1994). 15. Rampp M., and Janka H.-T., ApJ, 539, L33 (2000). 16. Reinecke M., Hillebrandt W., and Niemeyer J. C., A&A, 347, 739 (1999). 17. Thielemann F.-K., Nomoto K. I., and Hashimoto M., ApJ, 460, 408 (1996). 18. Woodward, P. R., ApJ, 207, 484 (1976). 19. Woodward, P. R., and Colella, P., Jour. of Comp. Phys., 54, 115 (1984). 20. Woosley S. E., Pinto P. A., and Ensman L., ApJ, 324, 466 (1988). 21. Woosley S. E., and Weaver T. A., ApJS, 101, 181 (1995).
astro-ph/9701146	1	9701	1997-01-20T20:30:45	Quantitative morphology and color gradients of E+A galaxies in distant galaxy clusters	[ "astro-ph" ]	Narrow band multifilter photometry of the galaxy populations of four galaxy clusters at z=0.4-0.5 has provided us with a sample of 73 E+A galaxies which are secure cluster members. For 34 of them HST images are available (WFPC2). We have determined surface brigthness profiles and by means of an exponential or r^1/4 law fit we have classified the galaxies on the basis of their bulge to disk ratio. We have found that most of these galaxies are disk systems judging from the exponential nature of their profiles. We have also derived color gradients for 10 E+A galaxies in Cl0016+16 to study the spatial distribution of the starburst and to distinguish among the physical mechanisms at its origin. Color gradients indicate that most of the E+A galaxies in Cl0016+16 show little spatial variation in V-I colors (restframe U-V). Thus, our large and homogeneous sample of distant E+A galaxies confirms the claim that their enhanced star formation is a galaxy-wide phenomenon.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Quantitative morphology and color gradients of E+A galaxies in distant galaxy clusters Paola Belloni Universitatssternwarte, Scheinerstrasse 1, D -- 81679 Munchen, Germany Three basic scenarios have been invocated to explain the sudden rise and decline of star formation in distant clusters that lead to the transformation of "active" galaxies into the elliptical− and S0−types which today dominate rich clusters, i.e. the so called Butcher-Oemler effect, (Butcher & Oemler,1978). These are: galaxy interactions or mergers with nearly equal mass neighbors (Lavery & Henry, 1988), gas-rich field galaxies running for the first time into the hot intercluster gas which ignites a brief but energetic episode of star formation (Bothun & Dressler, 1986), and high speed close encounters of gas-rich galaxies resulting in non-disruptive interactions or "galaxy harassment", (Moore, 1996). Although neither of the proposed mechanisms for triggering star formation has a definitive answer in its favour, the high resolution of the HST images of distant clusters has recently provided a unique tool to face this question. Indeed, it allows us to study the spatial distribution of the starburst and thus to distin- guish among the physical mechanisms at its origin. In the case of an infalling or harassed spiral the enhanced star formation would likely be a galaxy-wide phenomenon, or confined to the disk. If, on the other hand, the original galaxy was an elliptical that accreted gas from a dwarf galaxy, the burst signatures should be detectable as a bluer color of the nuclear region. Finally, in interact- ing or merging disk galaxies both behaviours have been observed: galaxies with starburst concentrated to the very center (Scoville et al.,1991) and others that show enhanced star formation on a galaxy-wide scale (Standford, 1991). We focuse on one class of "active" galaxies, the post-starburst or E+A galax- ies, the latter being only a description of the spectra which appear to have an A-star component added to an old elliptical like component. These spectral fea- tures are interpreted as evidence of a recent (< 1.5 Gyr) burst of star formation. Ground based narrow-band photometry of 4 intermediate redshift clusters at z=0.4-0.5 has provided us with a sample of 73 E+A galaxies being secure clus- ter members (Belloni et al.,1995; Belloni & Roser, 1996). This is the largest sample of such galaxies found to date in distant clusters. Cluster membership and spectral type have been obtained by fitting the observed low-resolution spec- tral energy distributions with template spectra built up with Bruzual & Charlot (1997) population synthesis models. They represent the temporal evolution of a strong star formation episode (involving 20% of the original galactic mass) in an elliptical galaxy or in a spiral galaxy with star formation truncated after the burst. Our approach allows us to detect bursts younger than 2 Gyr while galaxies with an older burst will not be distinguished from a passively evolving elliptical galaxy. 2 Paola Belloni Due to the small HST field of view only for 33 E+A galaxies HST images are available (WFPC2). We have retrieved them and determined: a) surface brightness profiles for all E+A galaxies but those showing highly irregular morphology. A fit with an exponential or a r−1/4 law has been performed and for disk galaxies a Hubble type classification has been attempted on the basis of the buldge to disk ratio, b) color gradients for the 10 E+A galaxies in Cl0016+16 (observed in the F555W and F814W filters). Table 1. Results of the surface brightness analysis of 33 E+A galaxies in intermediate redshift clusters. The E+A fraction is given with respect to the secure cluster members, about 120 galaxies brighter than mR=22.5 per cluster. For merging/interacting galaxies we indicate if possible whether they appear disk or bulge dominated. Cluster E+A E+A Morph. Morph. Morph. Sb-Sc (HST) Elliptical S0-Sa Merger Interact. 1 Cl0016+16 20 (21%) (z=0.54) Cl0939+47 35 (22%) (z=0.41) Cl0303+17 22 (22%) (z=0.41) Cl1447+26 (z=0.38) 8 (9%) 11 11 7 4 3 1 1 6 7 5 1 1 Disk-dominated 4 1 Irregular 2 Disk-dominated We found that most of the galaxies and all those showing signs of interaction are disk systems judging from the exponential nature of the pro- files (Tab.1). In our sample only one E+A galaxy has a regular elliptical profile. We also found that the E+A galaxies in Cl0016+16 show little spatial varia- tion in V-I colors (restframe U-V) (Fig.1). Only one young E+A galaxy with estimated post-starburst age 0.8 Gyr has a starburst predominantly located in the nucleus whereas a second one has a weaker evidence of the same behaviour. However, the E+A color gradients are flatter compared to those of cluster ellip- ticals (Belloni et al, 1997) that are consistent with the ∆(U-R)/∆log r=−0.23 mag observed in the nearby ones (Franx et al.,1993). Thus, our large and homo- geneous sample of distant E+A galaxies confirms the claim that their enhanced star formation is a galaxy-wide phenomenon. Indeed, similar results have been obtained for the post-starburst galaxies in the Coma cluster by Caldwell et al. (1996). We speculate that strong interactions did not create most of the post- starburst galaxies in our representative sample of galaxy clusters at z=0.4−0.5. Non-disruptive interactions among galaxies or interactions between galaxies in Color gradients of E+A galaxies in distant galaxy clusters 3 the cluster or subcluster structures and the ICM are likely to be the dominant mechanism. 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Fig. 1. a) Typical color gradients of E+A galaxies in CL0016+16 (z=0.54). b) One of the two E+A galaxies in Cl0016+16 showing strong color gradients. The very blue central colors (typical of spirals) indicate that the starburst is located in the nucleus. 1′′= 7.3 Kpc (Ho=50 km sec−1 Mpc−1 and q0=0) References Belloni, P., Bruzual G., Thimm, G., Roser H.-J., (1995): A&A 297,61 Belloni, P. & Roser (1996): A&AS 118, 65 Belloni, P. et al. (1997): ApJL, submitted Butcher, H. & Oemler, A. (1978): ApJ 219, 18 Bothun, G. & Dressler A. (1986): AJ 301, 57 Caldwell et al. (1996): AJ.111, 78 Franx, M., Illingworth, G., Heckman,.T. (1993): AJ.98, 2 Lavery, R. & Henry P. (1988): ApJ 330, 596 Moore, et al. (1996): Nature 379, 613. Scoville, N. et al. (1991): ApJ. 336, L5 Standford, S., (1991): ApJ. 381, 409
astro-ph/9811231	1	9811	1998-11-14T02:54:41	The Survival of The Core Fundamental Plane Against Galactic Mergers	[ "astro-ph" ]	We have developed an effective simulation method and applied it to the problem of the accretion of very dense secondary companions by tenuous primaries. We have studied the accretion of objects of varying luminosity ratios, with sizes and densities drawn from the core Fundamental Plane for elliptical galaxies under the assumption that the mass distribution in the central parts of the galaxies follows the light. The results indicate that in mergers with mass ratios greater than 10, the smaller object is only stripped down to the highest density encountered in the primary during the accretion process. Thus, the form of the core Fundamental Plane suggests that the mass distribution in these galaxy centers is different than the light distribution, or that mergers on the core Fundamental Plane require more than the dynamics of visible stars.	astro-ph	astro-ph	The Survival of The Core Fundamental Plane Against Galactic Mergers Kelly Holley-Bockelmann and Douglas Richstone 1 Astronomy Department, University of Michigan Received ; accepted 8 9 9 1 v o N 4 1 1 v 1 3 2 1 1 8 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a 1and Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540 -- 2 -- ABSTRACT The basic dimensional properties of the centers of elliptical galaxies, such as length scale, luminosity, and velocity dispersion, lie on a Fundamental Plane similar to that of elliptical galaxies as a whole. The orientation of this plane, and the distribution of core parameters within it, project to a strong correlation of core density with either core or total luminosity, and indicate that low luminosity ellipticals are much denser than high luminosity galaxies (HST data suggests that this relationship may be as steep as ρc ∝ L−2). In addition, low luminosity ellipticals have a much smaller length scale than their high luminosity counterparts. Since we think small galaxies are occasionally accreted by big ones, the high density of these galaxies and their likely durability against the time-varying tidal field of the bigger ones suggests that they will survive substantially intact in the cores of larger galaxies and would be easily visible. Their presence would destroy the observed correlation. Motivated by this apparent inconsistency between an observed fact and a simple physical argument, we have developed an effective simulation method and applied it to the problem of the accretion of very dense secondary companions by tenuous primaries. We have studied the accretion of objects of varying luminosity ratios, with sizes and densities drawn from the Fundamental Plane under the assumption that the mass distribution in the central parts of the galaxies follows the light. The results indicate that in mergers with mass ratios greater than 10, chosen with an appropriate central density dependence on luminosity, the smaller object is only stripped down to the highest density encountered in the primary during the accretion process. Thus, the form of the core Fundamental Plane suggests that the mass distribution in the galaxy centers is different than the light distribution, or that an understanding of -- 3 -- secondary survival requires more than the dynamics of visible stars. Subject headings: stellar dynamics - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics -galaxies: evolution - galaxies: clusters - galaxies: nucleii - galaxies: elliptical -- 4 -- 1. Introduction In the framework of hierarchical galaxy formation, massive elliptical galaxy centers are merger archives, in the sense that the history of each component is imprinted upon it. The stellar Roche limit suggests that the accretion of dense galaxies by larger, more tenuous ones would leave dense galaxies nearly intact. Hence, the central density of any massive galaxy should vary widely as a function of the extent of prior merging. Instead, the global parameters of elliptical galaxies vary simply with the luminosity. Elliptical galaxies exist in a well-defined slice of global parameter space called the Fundamental Plane (Dressler et al. 1987, Djorgovski and Davis 1987). Similarly, the central parameters of galaxies are also arranged on a plane called the core Fundamental Plane (Faber 1997). On the core Fundamental Plane, small galaxies can be 106 times more dense than large galaxies (Faber, 1997). This enormous dynamic range in density presents a formidable challenge for hierarchical merging because in this theory, the dense center that results from the nearly intact accretion of a small galaxy by a bigger one will cause the remnant to evolve off the Fundamental Plane. Consequently, the persistence of the Fundamental Plane is an indication either that mergers are uncommon or that additional forces are at work to destroy the secondary. There is considerable evidence that mergers do occur. Observations of brightest cluster galaxies indicate that massive ellipticals evolve by accretion of small satellites at a rate of up to 0.2L⋆ per Gyr (Lauer 1988, Blakesee and Tonry 1992). Simulations of galaxy cluster evolution also demonstrate that mergers occur, although the importance of this process in the creation of cD galaxies has been debated (Malumuth and Richstone, 1983; Merritt, 1984). So, while it is clear from the persistence of the Fundamental Plane that mergers must destroy the smaller satellites, it is not clear how such dense systems are destroyed. -- 5 -- Recently, Weinberg (1997) has argued that internal heating of the secondary can cause it to evaporate well inside the tidal radius. This heating occurs when some of the orbits of stars in the secondary resonate with the time-dependent tidal forces imposed by the primary. To demonstrate this, Weinberg perturbs a solution of the Boltzmann equation and recomputes the gravitational field of the secondary for King models on the global Fundamental Plane. He states that a satellite with a mass ratio as high as 100:1 will dissipate entirely by the time it falls to the primary center (Weinberg, 1997). As we will show later, although we agree with Weinberg's result for the specific problem he did, his models lack the density contrast observed for Fundamental Plane galaxy cores, so his simulations have limited application to the problem of core Fundamental Plane persistence. Mergers of galaxies with very different densities are expensive to simulate with a straightforward N-body approach due to the disparity in two important timescales. First, we must consider the orbital decay of the secondary into the primary, which is of order of the dynamical friction timescale, and varies as M1/M2 ρ−1/2 orbital periods of stars within the secondary, which vary as ρ−1/2 1 . We must also consider the 2 where ρ1 and ρ2 are the densities of the primary and secondary. So, even for a modest mass ratio, tracking the stars in each galaxy over the entire merger requires on the the order of 100 M1/M2 (ρ1/ρ2)−1/2 timesteps. There are few published direct simulations of this type of merger for this reason. In one important case, however, Balcells and Quinn (1990) did simulate an elliptical galaxy merger with a mass ratio of 10:1 (and density ratio of approximately 1:14). Contrary to Weinberg's result, the secondary remained intact inside its tidal radius as it sank to the center of the primary, although the orbital decay was perhaps too fast to produce resonant heating. We have designed an approach to determine the conditions under which core Fundamental Plane secondaries survive mergers. This approach can efficiently merge -- 6 -- systems with mass ratios as high as 1000, a range unexplored by standard simulations. In this paper, we describe this method and apply it to the problem of secondary survival. We review the core Fundamental Plane in § 2, our galaxy models in § 3.1, the approximation method in § 3.3, and our code in § 3.4. The tests of the method and results of our simulations can be found in § 4. Briefly, it appears that core Fundamental Plane secondaries survive mergers in which the mass ratio is 10:1 or larger. Section 5 discusses the implications of our results on the persistence of the core Fundamental Plane and previews future work. 2. The Core Fundamental Plane In the parameter space composed of the effective radius, re, the effective surface brightness, µe, and the central velocity dispersion, σ0, elliptical galaxies are confined to a plane -- the "Fundamental Plane" or FP (Dressler et al. (1987), Djorgovski & Davis, 1987). Recently Jorgensen et al. (1996) characterized the FP as log re = 1.24 log σ0 − 0.82Ie + γ, where γ may depend on environment. A popular interpretation of the Fundamental Plane is that it is a manifestation of virial equilibrium together with an orderly and slow dependence of galaxy mass -- to -- light ratio on luminosity. Faber et al. (1997) report the existence of an analogous plane for elliptical galaxy centers based on core parameters, though this core Fundamental Plane has more scatter than the global Fundamental Plane. The existence of such a plane indicates that the processes which act upon galaxies are primarily scale-independent. More importantly, this plane provides an important constraint on the merger history of elliptical galaxies, because if a galaxy merges, the remnant must also lie upon the plane. In particular, this implies that when a small dense galaxy collides with a massive galaxy, the remnant must have the low density center that is characteristic of a massive primary. When simulating the mergers of real galaxies, then, it is imperative that the initial -- 7 -- models lie on both planes. Although the Fundamental plane is 2-dimensional, we adopt the convention of Faber (1997) and represent the core galaxies as a 1-dimensional family dependent on total luminosity. This is a convenient approximation which is made possible by the tight correlation between global and break luminosity and by the nearly edge-on projection of the plane onto these axes. The core data can be fit as follows: log rb = −0.46 Mv − 7.7 log Lb = 1.3 log Le − 5.097 log reff = 0.75 log rb + 2.06, (1) (2) (3) where rb is the break radius, Mv is the absolute visual magnitude, Lb is the visual luminosity at the break radius, Le is the visual luminosity at the effective radius, and ref f is the effective radius. The following additional relations were obtained (Faber et al. 1997) by assuming a slightly varying mass-to-light ratio along the Fundamental Plane of M/L ∝ L0.25 , e e σ0 ∝ L0.2 0/r2 ρb ∝ σ2 b ∝ L−1.9 e . (4) (5) This last equation is the crux of the difference between our simulations and Weinberg's. Weinberg's expression of the Fundamental plane is ρb ∝ M 0.5, where M is the mass of the galaxy, so for reasonable choices of M/L, his Fundamental Plane has a much shallower dependence on density with radius. See figure 1 for best-fit projections of the core Fundamental Plane to the Lauer et al. (1995) core data. 3. Methods -- 8 -- 3.1. Modeling the Core Fundamental Plane The disruption of the secondary galaxy centers will depend on the density ratio between the primary and the secondary, and on their density profiles. We therefore construct models designed to reflect the range in profiles observed on the core Fundamental Plane. We use η models for this purpose (Tremaine et al. 1994, Dehnen, 1994). These are simple, spherical systems defined by their density distributions: ρη(r) = Mtot 3 rb ∼ ρ (η, r/rb), where ∼ ρ (η, x) ≡ 1 4π η x3−η(1 + x)1+η , 0 < η ≤ 3, (6) (7) where η is the single dimensionless parameter that defines the slope of the inner density profile, ρ is the stellar density, Mtot is the total mass, rb is the break radius, and x is the dimensionless radius x = r/rb. We fit the the deprojected stellar density profiles provided by Gebhardt et al. (1996) to determine η as a function of the absolute magnitude Mv. The data (see Figure 1) show a correlation of the structural parameter η with Mv. The ridgeline of the correlation was fit by eye as follows: 3.0 − 0.375Mv − 9.1, 3.0 − 0.15Mv − 4.7, if Mv ≤ −19.5; if Mv − 19.5 . (8) η =   While eta models are well-suited to cover the range of luminous matter densities in elliptical galaxy centers, the model's density profile drops off more rapidly (ρ ∝ r−4) than a real galaxy's at large radii. Although we anticipate that the envelope of a secondary would be completely stripped in an encounter with a primary, and is therefore irrelevant, we were concerned that truncating the envelope might have an unforseen effect on our calculations. So, we mimicked an r1/4 law outer profile by constructing a basic set of galaxies with eta -- 9 -- model envelopes. We call these galaxies double η models. Their density is defined as follows: ρ(r) = Mc 3 rc ∼ ρ (ηc, r/rc) + Me 3 re ∼ ρ (ηe, r/re), (9) where the subscript c and e corresponds to eta model parameters chosen at the core and effective radius, respectively. The core radius in equation 9 is chosen to be mimic the break radius on the core Fundamental Plane. The envelope term parameters are chosen to be consistent with global Fundamental Plane parameters and with re ∝ rc (Faber, 1997). For re on the order of 100 rc, ρ(r) provides a reasonable approximation to a 1.33 (see equation 3) deVaucoleur profile. 3.2. Populating the Galaxies To populate our galaxies, we require the phase space distribution function. From our spherically symmetric initial density profile, we can derive the initial distribution function, f (ε), via Eddington's formula: f (ε) = 1 √8π2  Z ε 0 d2ρ dΨ2 + dΨ q(ε − Ψ) 1 √ε dρ dΨ!Ψ=0 ,   (10) where ε = −E + Φ0 is the relative energy, and Ψ = −Φ + Φ0 is the relative potential (Binney and Tremaine, 1987). Φ0 is chosen so that the distribution function is positive for ε > 0 and zero for ε ≤ 0. The second term in equation 12 is zero, because Ψ = 0 when r → ∞, and as r → ∞, ρ ∝ r−4 ∝ Ψ4. Determining f (ε), then, simply requires knowledge of d2ρ/dΨ2. Defining u = 1/r, d2ρ dΨ2 = d du dρ dΨ!(cid:30) dΨ du . (11) -- 10 -- For unscaled η models, d du" dρ dΨ# = "12u2 + 4(3 − η)u3 z 4u3 + (3 − η)u4 z ′ z2 #, − where z = (1 + u)2, and z ′ = dz/du. (1 + u)−η, 1/(1 + u), if η 6= 1.0, if η = 1.0 . dΨ du =   (12) (13) See Tremaine et al, 1994 for an equivalent expression of the second derivative. The second derivative for the double η model case has many more terms, but follows directly from the above derivation. Given the distribution function, we know the number of particles within the phase space d3v d3x. To populate the secondary, then, we choose a random scalar radius from the mass profile, and determine the speed by choosing a random scalar velocity from: f (v)dv = 4πv2f (Ψ − 1 2 v2)dv. (14) Finally, cartesian position and velocity components are derived from uncorrelated random orientations of r and v. These two component galaxies were simulated with 5000 particles. In these simulations, the outer envelope was stripped away on the first encounter with the center of the primary, and we took advantage of this result by conducting additional simulations of the inner portions of the galaxies with an inner eta model of 2000 particles. This markedly improved our spatial resolution. These simulations contain a reasonable particle number, but in principle, the simulations can and will be repeated with more particles as computational speed increases. Model parameters are given in Table 1. Figure 1 illustrates the placement of the models on the core Fundamental Plane. -- 11 -- 3.3. The Tidal Force on the Secondary A straightforward technique to simulate mergers is to follow the interaction of the primary and secondary with an N-body code. However, when the galaxies involved have very different masses, the interaction takes an unreasonably long time to simulate in this straightforward manner, as described in the introduction. We have developed an approximation method which dramatically decreases the computational time required to simulate high mass contrast mergers. Our approximation hinges on the assumption that the potential of a high mass galaxy is not significantly altered by the impact of a low mass object. This approximation allows us to concentrate on the behavior of the secondary only. The merger, then, can be characterized as the secondary's response to the external force it experiences as its orbit decays in the field of the primary. Clearly, the external force on the secondary depends upon its position in the primary galaxy. We determine the orbital decay trajectory by solving the equations of motion for a point particle in the field of a galaxy of mass M1: ~F1−2(~S) = − GM1(~S)m2 ~S2 − Ffric(~S), (15) where ~S is the vector from the center of the primary and to the secondary center, and Ffric is a modified Chandrasekhar dynamical friction formula. This also presupposes an unchanging primary, and neglects the effect of mass loss in the secondary. Ffric(~S) = −fdrag 4πlnΛG2ρ1m2 2 3 ~v2 herf(X) − where ~v2 is the velocity of the secondary's center of mass, X ≡ v2/(√2σ), σ = q0.4GM1/r1,eff, Λ is the Coulomb logarithm which was set to M1/M2, and fdrag is a drag coefficient. This drag coefficient is necessary, because the decay times 2X √π e−X 2i~v2, (16) -- 12 -- generated by numerical treecode experiments were longer and exhibited more pericenter passes than the unmodified Chandrasekhar formula. Since the number of pericenter passes is correlated with the amount of destruction in a particular secondary, we chose to match the number of pericenter passes and the overall decay time by adjusting the analytical dynamical friction force by drag coefficient fdrag. Figure 3 shows the treecode-generated trajectory and several analytically-derived trajectories with different drag coefficients. Once the orbital decay trajectory is computed, the external force on particles within the secondary can be written as: ~FS(~r) = − GM1(~S + ~r)m2 (~S + ~r + ǫ)3 , (17) where ~r is the vector which points from the secondary center to a secondary particle, and ǫ is a softening parameter which we chose to be close to the core radius of the secondary. We advance the system in the secondary frame, so the appropriate force is the sum of the tidal force and the secondary's self-gravity: ~Ftot(~r) = ~Fin(~r) + ~FS(~r) − ~FS(0). (18) We tested the assumption that the primary is unchanged by the secondary for each mass ratio by dropping a secondary point mass into a 10000 particle primary using either Hernquist's treecode (1987) or self-consistent field code (1992). The density profile of the primary did not change for the 100:1 and 10:1 cases (see Figure 2), so the approximation is a valid one for those mass ratios. This method is more computationally efficient as the mass ratio increases, and is over 50 times faster than the Hernquist treecode in the 10:1 mass ratio. -- 13 -- 3.4. Approximating the Self-Gravity of the Secondary We constructed a self-consistent particle-field code which treats the mass distribution as a sphere and uses a logarithmic grid. This force is estimated by first convolving the mass distribution with an adaptive kernel function (Silverman, 1986) to get a density estimate. An adaptive kernel provides a non-parametric density estimate on a grid. We use an Epanechnikov kernel (an inverted parabola) for the density estimate: 3 4(1−r2) if r < 1 , 0 otherwise, (19) Ke =   where r = x − xi/h, x is a particle position, xi is a grid point, and h is the window width. An initial density estimate is obtained, then the window width of each grid element is adjusted according to the initial density such that low density regions have a large window width, and high density regions have greater mass resolution. This gives us a smoothed M(r) from which force and potential are easily computed (Merritt, 1996). Although it is true that this code, which forces spherical symmetry, is not an appropriate choice if one wishes to model the shape of the highly non-spherical process of satellite disruption, we were concerned about whether a particle was bound to the secondary, not with obtaining an accurate shape for the stripped debris. Furthermore, since the tidal force is a very strong function of r, the core of the secondary, where the calculation matters most, is spherically symmetric. Particle trajectories are advanced in the secondary frame with a single timestep leapfrog method. We tested this code by following the total energy of each secondary without the influence of an external force. For double η secondaries, energy was conserved to within 1 % over 1700 core crossing times, the time in which the 100:1 mass ratio case would have decayed had an external force been present. The mean energy and root mean square energy -- 14 -- of the individual stars were conserved to within 2 % over this interval. Inner η models exhibited more heating, initially, because the kernel inaccurately determined the density very near the center of the system. Since inner η models have a better resolution, there were a small number of particles that were close enough to the center of the secondary for this inaccuracy to matter. We restored energy conservation by setting the mass distribution to that of the inner η model inside 0.01rb, and reflecting any particles entering this sphere back outward with the same energy and angular momentum. These modifications to the code affected approximately 10 particles, but markedly improved the energy efficiency. See figure 4 for δEtot vs. crossing time. 3.5. Initial Conditions Each secondary was followed as an isolated system for several dynamical times to ensure its virial equilibrium. The merger simulation begins as the secondary is launched from 3rhalf of the primary with an initial velocity that depends upon the orbit desired; for a plunging orbit, we launch the secondary with zero velocity. We define an angular momentum parameter κ ≡ L/Lcirc, where L is the initial orbital angular momentum, and Lcirc is the orbital angular momentum that the secondary would have if it were on a circular orbit about the primary at the launch point. Each simulation is followed until the secondary's apocenter is less than 0.1 rb of the secondary. 4. Results Since our goal is to investigate the breakup or survival of dense secondaries orbiting in primaries, we initially focused on the encounters we thought would be the most destructive. The destruction of the secondary, however, must occur without leaving a lasting imprint -- 15 -- on the remnant, and this depends on where in the primary a secondary is stripped. For example, in a decaying circular orbit, the tidal force from the primary would gain strength as the secondary's orbit decays. In this case, even if substantial damage occurred, the debris would continue to orbit near the center of the primary, and the density of the remnant would be large near the center. The orbits most effective for dispersing the secondary over a large volume must be the deeply plunging ones, since these encounters would carry the secondary past the center of the primary on its first orbit with considerable orbital energy. Our basic set of experiments, therefore, were parabolic encounters with no angular momentum. For an overview of the different experiments conducted, see table 2. 4.1. Basic Set of Experiments Anticipating that the most damaging effect would be due to tidal forces experienced as the secondary passes through the center of the primary, we launched a series of nearly parabolic, plunging orbits. In this basic set of experiments, we investigated three mass ratios: 100:1, 10:1, and 2.5:1. These mass ratios correspond to density ratios of approximately 1:51, 1:20, and 1:1 at a radius of 1 pc, and the density ratio increases at smaller radii. The secondary was modeled as a double eta model in order to represent the envelope. We focus first on the 100:1 simulation. Figure 5 shows the time evolution of the secondary in the force field of the primary. Here, we learn that most of the mass is stripped at pericenter, and comes off impulsively in a cloud which continues to expand as the secondary crosses the primary center again. In figure 6, we illustrate the change in the secondary center from beginning to end. The secondary remained intact inside the 3 ≈ M1/M2 S3. Figure 7 illustrates the change in the secondary for the 10:1 mass ratio. In the 2.5:1 experiment, the secondary and primary have similar central tidal radius, rtide densities, and the secondary is destroyed (figure 8). -- 16 -- We note that the primary and secondary in the 2.5:1 mass ratio are close enough in mass for the approximation scheme to fail, because the primary is not expected to remain unaffected by a merger of similar mass. We address this fact by conducting a treecode experiment, which we discuss in § 4.5. 4.2. Comparison of Drag Coefficients Recall the drag coefficient, fdrag in § 3.3 which adjusts the strength of Chandrasekhar's dynamical friction force to be comparable to treecode generated orbital decay times. Changing the strength of the frictional force, though, also changes the velocity of the secondary, and therefore both the magnitude of the shock on the secondary as it passes through pericenter and the number of pericenter passes. We tested the importance of this effect by simply varying the drag coefficient on the 100:1 fiducial experiment. In 2 simulations with fdrag = 0.1 and fdrag = 0.2, we saw no significant difference in the secondary's inner density profile, although it is apparent that the secondary suffers more tidal stripping as it goes through more pericenter passes (see figure 9). Consequently, we set fdrag to the value determined by a treecode simulation of a point secondary in a responsive primary for each mass ratio in all further experiments. This provided a more accurate timescale for the decay, but did not affect the survival of the secondary. 4.3. Comparison between Inner η and Double η Models To achieve better sampling of the central regions of the secondary, we populated only the center of the galaxy with an inner η model. While this method excludes the secondary envelope, it is a reasonable plan because our basic set of experiments determined that the envelope is stripped away quickly without markedly changing the density profile at the -- 17 -- center (see § 4.1 and figures 6-8). Note that the orbital decay due to dynamical friction is the same as the previous experiment. We only followed the stars in the inner part of the galaxy but used the total mass of the secondary to determine the orbital decay. As in the fiducial set of experiments, these simulations show that the secondary remains intact in the 100:1 and 10:1 mass ratio, and that the secondary breaks up in the 2.5:1 mass ratio (figures 10-12). 4.4. Non-radial Secondary Orbits To explore the effect that different orbits have upon the disruption of the secondary, we launched secondaries in the 10:1 mass ratios on κ ≡ L/Lcirc = 0.2 and κ = 0.6 orbits, and the 100:1 mass ratio on a κ = 0.2 orbit. The ratio of second apocenter to first pericenter is approximately 66 in the 100:1, κ = 0.2 orbit, and 34 and 16 for the 10:1, κ = 0.2 and κ = 0.6 orbits, respectively. The computation time for these simulations required us to use inner η models and to follow only the bound particles. Still, the κ = 0.6 run took approximately 2.5 months. In every case, the secondary's innermost density profile remained essentially intact; the secondary center was steeper and more dense than the primary, so the center of the remnant is dominated by the secondary (Figures 13-15). For a comparison of the effect that orbit has upon the disruption of the secondary, we overplot the final secondary profile for each orbit in the 100:1 and 10:1 inner η experiments (figure 16). 4.5. Treecode Comparison Our method works best at high mass contrasts, because for a given primary, the lower the secondary mass, the less the primary is affected by a merger. In addition, the gravitational force on the secondary is better approximated as a tide when it is small -- 18 -- compared to the self-gravity of the secondary, as it is for a small, dense, secondary. On the other hand, the treecode is superior at low mass-contrasts because it can follow changes in the primary. We compare the results from these two problems at a mass ratio of 2.5:1 We launched a 2000 particle double η secondary into a 5000 particle double η primary along the same orbit as described in the fiducial experiments and followed the behavior with the Hernquist treecode. In the treecode simulation the primary center is highly disrupted by the secondary. Our method cannot reproduce this effect. In spite of the marked difference between the behavior of the primary in each method, the qualitative behavior of the secondary is the same: the secondary central density decreases to that of the primary (figure 17). The fact that we obtain the same qualitative results provides some confidence in the method. In addition, the fact that our method fails to address the change in the potential of the primary in a clear warning that the method is quantitatively unreliable when the mass ratios are very close to 1. 4.6. Comparison to Weinberg's Results A key test of our method is to duplicate Weinberg's experiment using our approximation method. Weinberg chose to represent the Fundamental Plane with King model galaxies (King, 1966). King models are a single parameter set of solutions of the Vlasov equation, which can be labeled by the dimensionless potential W0 = −V0/(2σ2) (where V0 and σ are the central potential and dispersion parameter), or equivalently by the ratio of "tidal" to core radii rt/rc. The mass distribution in a King model is given by M(r) = µ(r/rc)ρ0r3 c , where ρ0 is the central density and µ is a dimensionless function. Weinberg adopted a single choice of -- 19 -- W0 in his experiments, so his models all had the same dimensionless mass distribution but scaled up or down in both density and length scale. We chose to duplicate one of Weinberg's 10:1 mass ratio simulations. In this experiment, he populated two W0 = 9.5 King models with densities defined by the global Fundamental Plane: ρ ∝ M −0.5. He determined the orbital decay with Chandrasekhar's analytical dynamical friction formula, using the Coulomb logarithm ln Λ = max[ln(Rcirc/rhalf), 0.1], which caused the orbit to decay in 10 orbits for a choice of κ = 0.1. We prefer our handling of the orbital dynamical friction because it is calibrated by the treecode. However, we wish to critically compare our calculation of the effect of the fluctuating tide to Weinberg's problem, so we selected a choice of fdrag such that our orbit also decayed in 10 passes for κ = 0.1. In all dimensionless characteristics, our experimental set up is the same. See table 3 for the parameters used in this experiment. 2 Weinberg contends that the secondary is disrupted by the time it reaches the center, with most of the disruption due to stripping near the primary center. In this particular case, we obtain the same result (figure 18); that is, the secondary is stripped by nearly a factor of 10, and ρ2 = ρ1. This shows is that when we do exactly the same experiment as Weinberg, we get the same result. Therefore, the differences between our results and Weinberg's are not due to differences in calculation methods. Instead, we believe the differences are due to different choices of galaxy models and the use of these models to mimic the Fundamental Plane. In our paper, we carefully selected each galaxy to fall on 2 There is a typographical error in the Weinberg preprint that causes in an inconsistency between the King model concentration and the tidal radius; this prevented us from taking Weinberg's precise radius in parsecs and his Coulomb logarithm. We circumvented this problem by creating two W0 = 9.5 King models that differed in mass by 10 and density by a factor of 3, consistent with Weinberg's model. -- 20 -- the global and core Fundamental Planes, assuming light follows mass within the galaxies. 5. Discussion We have developed an approximation scheme that allows us to investigate the mergers of systems with high density ratios. We can use this method to simulate merging systems with central density contrasts as high as 1500 with less than a month of computer time on an UltraSparc. Our simulations show that disruption will not occur for secondaries that are much denser than their primaries. While resonant heating may enhance tidal shocking in the disruption of secondary galaxies, this only appears to matter when the density contrast between primary and secondary is not too large. Weinberg's King model secondaries evaporated because they do not possess the high densities that real secondaries exhibit on the core Fundamental Plane. This result presents a quandary. We suspect, from observations of merger rates, that dense secondaries do merge with more diffuse primaries. In the process, the secondary must be destroyed, since observations of the centers of massive merger remnants rarely show dense, small secondaries. Instead, nearly every large remnant has a low-density center with a density profile that flattens out inside a break radius; this is a key aspect of the core Fundamental Plane. The inability of purely stellar mergers to destroy the secondaries suggests that an important component of the problem is missing. One possible solution to this quandary may be massive black holes. The widespread presence of massive black holes in galaxy centers has been suggested, for example, by Kormendy & Richstone (1995), Magorrian (in press), Richstone (in press). Black holes act as excellent scatterers, and their presence in the centers of massive primaries may provide -- 21 -- tidal forces sufficient to disrupt a dense secondary. We will present extensive simulations of the effect of black holes in a second paper. However, alternative possibilities include radial variations of M/L within individual galaxies, with an amplitude strongly dependent on galaxy luminosity, in the sense that luminous galaxies possess sharp concentrations of unseen mass. In order to be effective, the mass concentration would have to be more dramatic than the M/L variation with luminosity implied by the core Fundamental Plane. Support for this work was provided by the Space Science Telescope Institute, through general observer grant GO-06099.05-94A, and by NASA through a theory grant G-NAG5- 2758. DR thanks the Guggenheim Foundation and the Ambrose Monell Foundation for support at the IAS. We thank the members of the NUKER collaboration for helpful conversations. We also thank the referee, Martin Weinberg, for his insightful suggestions. -- 22 -- REFERENCES Balcells, M., Quinn, P. J. 1990, ApJ, 361, 381-393 Barnes, J., Hernquist, L. 1991, ApJL, 370, L65 Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics (Princeton University Press) Blakesee, J., Tonry, J. 1992, AJ, 104, 599 Busarello, G., Capaccioli, M., Capozziello, S., Longo, G., Puddu, E. 1997, A&A, 320, 415B Dehnen, W. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 250 Djorgovski, S, & Davis, M., 1987, ApJ, 313, 59 Dressler, A., et. al. 1987, ApJ, 313, 42 Faber, S., Jackson, R. 1976, ApJ, 204, 668F Faber, S. 1996, private communication Faber, S., Kormendy, J., Byun, Youg-Ik, Dressler, A., Grillmair, C., Lauer, T., Richstone, D., Gebhardt, K., Tremaine, S. 1997, ApJ, in press Hernquist, L., Ostriker, J. 1992, ApJ, 386, 375-397 Hernquist, L. 1987, ApJS, 64, 715 Hernquist, L. 1992, ApJ, 400, 460 Jorgensen, I., Franx, M., Kjaergaard, P. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 167J King, I. 1966, ApJ, 71, 64 Kormendy, J. 1985, ApJL, 292, L9 Kormendy, J. & Richstone D. 1995, Ann Rev Astron and Astroph, 33, 581 Lauer, T. R. 1985a, ApJS, 57, 473 Lauer, T. R. 1985b, MNRAS, 216, 429 -- 23 -- Lauer, T.R., Ajhar, E., Byun, Yong-Ik, Dressler, A., Faber, S., Grillmair, C., Kormendy, J., Richstone, D., Tremaine, S. 1995, AJ, 110, 2622 Magorrian, J. 1998, AJ, 115, In press Merritt, D. 1996, AJ, 111, 2462 Mihos, J., Hernquist, L. 1994, ApJ Letters, 437, L47 Richstone D. 1998, Nature, In press Silverman, B.W., 1986, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (New York: Chapman and Hall) Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., Byun, Youg-Ik, Dressler, A., Faber, S., Grillmair, C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. 1994, AJ, 107, 634 Weinberg, M. 1997, ApJ, 478, 435 Weinberg, M. 1994a, ApJ, 108, 1398-1402 Weinberg, M. 1994b, ApJ, 108, 1403-1413 Weinberg, M. 1994c, ApJ, 108, 1414-1420 This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0. -- 24 -- Fig. 1. -- A comparison of data and our model of core parameters of galaxies. In each panel, the Lauer et al. (1995) galaxy core data are plotted as squares, and a fit of the core and the power-law data is plotted as a line. Panel A shows estimated values of η for the Lauer et al. sample, together with our adopted model. The 5 X's in panel A correspond to the 5 unique galaxies in Table 1. The other three panels represent the projections of the core Fundamental Plane for these galaxies. Panel B is a plot of core radius versus absolute visual magnitude for the Lauer et al data and our model. In this panel, the stellated X demonstrates the core radius that Weinberg's 1:100 mass ratio secondary would have if the primary were to lie on the core Fundamental Plane at Mv = −22. This illustrates that Weinberg's simulated Fundamental Plane has a shallower slope, as seen by the dashed line. Panel C plots resolution-limited surface brightness versus absolute visual magnitude of the Lauer et al sample, with the central surface brightness and absolute visual magnitude of our models. Panel D plots the resolution limited velocity dispersion versus absolute visual magnitude for the data, and the central velocity dispersion versus absolute visual magnitude of our models. Fig. 2. -- The change in the primary during a 1:100 merger. The density of the primary is shown as a function of radius before and after the merger. The initial density of the primary is a dashed line, and the final density is a solid line. The changes are fluctuations due to small number statistics. Fig. 3. -- The distance between primary and secondary centers versus secondary crossing time. We plot the secondary decay trajectory from a treecode experiment as a solid line, and the analytical dynamical friction derived decay trajectories from two experiments with varying drag coefficients. The short dashed line represents fdrag = 1.0, and the long dashed line has fdrag = 0.2. Fig. 4. -- Test of the method: energy conservation. We plot the total energy (normalized -- 25 -- so that the mean energy is 1.0) versus the core crossing time of the secondary for the inner η model secondary, and for the double η model secondary. Energy is constant to within 2 percent for both simulations, although energy conservation is better for the double η secondary after it relaxes. Fig. 5. -- The projection of the xy plane of a secondary as it merges with a primary 100 times more massive. Each panel represents a different snapshot of the secondary along its orbital decay trajectory. The trajectory of the secondary is shown on the bottom of the plot, as in Figure 3. Most of the envelope particles are unbound after the first pass, and by the second pass, 90% of the matter is stripped away. However, the inner particles remain bound to the secondary's potential. Fig. 6. -- Density profile for the mass ratio 100:1 basic experiment. In the top panel, we illustrate the change in the inner density profile of the secondary. We plot the density at a radius r against radius in parsecs. The solid line is the final secondary profile, the thick dashed line is the initial state of the secondary, and the dotted line is the density profile of the primary for comparison. In the bottom panel, the thick solid line represents the resulting remnant, the dotted line corresponds to the final state of the primary, and the thin solid line represents the final state of the secondary. Inside the tidal radius, the secondary is unchanged (refer to § 4.1). Fig. 7. -- Density profile for the 10:1 basic experiment. See caption for Figure 6. Fig. 8. -- Density profile for the 2.5:1 basic experiment. See caption for Figure 6. Fig. 9. -- We plot the secondary's density at radius r versus radius for two drag coefficients. We adjusted the magnitude of the dynamical friction force by a drag coefficient that we obtained by fitting the orbital decay time generated by Chandrasekhar to that generated by a full treecode simulation. This plot indicates that varying the drag coefficient, fdrag, by a -- 26 -- small amount does not affect the overall result of the merger. The solid line is the initial secondary, the dashed line is the fdrag = 0.2 case and the dotted line is for fdrag = 0.1. In both simulations, the secondary remains intact at the center, although the more pericenter passes, the more the outer envelope is stripped. Fig. 10. -- Better inner resolution for 100:1. See the caption for Figure 6. Inside the tidal radius, the secondary is essentially intact, although a comparison with Figure 6 demonstrates that more mass is lost inside the tidal radius (refer to § 4.3). Fig. 11. -- Better inner resolution for 10:1. See caption for Figure 6. Fig. 12. -- Better inner resolution for 2.5:1. See caption for Figure 6. In this experiment, the density of the secondary at the center has dropped to or below the density of the primary. Fig. 13. -- κ = 0.2 orbit for 100:1. See caption for Figure 6. The secondary is intact inside the tidal radius. Fig. 14. -- κ = 0.6 Orbit for 10:1. See caption for Figure 6. In this experiment, there is a minor amount of mass loss inside the tidal radius, even for very small radii, but qualitatively, the secondary survives and overwhelms the inner density profile of the remnant (bottom panel). Fig. 15. -- κ = 0.2 orbit for 10:1. See caption for Figure 6. Fig. 16. -- Overplot of final secondary density for different orbits. We plot the density at a radius r against radius in parsecs. The top panel is for the 100:1 mass ratio and the bottom panel illustrates the 10:1 mass ratio. The solid line in each case is the κ = 0.0 case, the short dashed line is the κ = 0.2 case, and the long dashed line is the κ = 0.6 case. Fig. 17. -- Treecode comparison for 2.5:1. See caption for Figure 6, noting that in this experiment, the density profile of the primary changes. The secondary evolves until it is -- 27 -- everywhere below the initial state of the primary. Refer to § 4.5. Fig. 18. -- Comparison to Weinberg's results for 10:1. See caption for Figure 6. In this experiment, the secondary is destroyed, as it is in Weinberg's paper. The secondary central density is only a factor of 3 greater than the primary initially, and after the merger, the density of the secondary is everywhere less than 10 percent greater than the primary. We regard this as consistent with Weinberg's experiment. -- 28 -- Table 1. Eta Model Galaxy Parameters M1 M2 Galaxy Mv rcore a Mcore b ηcore renv Menv ηenv rhalf tcore 100:1 Primary -22.0 263 4.7 x 1010 2.15 4000 3.4 x 1012 2.2 10617 5932 Secondary -18.0 3.8 1.6 x 108 1.0 300 3.5 x 1010 1.5 508 123 1.34 98.66 4.4 x 10−3 0.996 10:1 Primary -21.5 155 2.3 x 1010 1.96 4000 1.9 x 1012 2.0 9506 9220 Secondary -19.5 18.63 1.3 x 109 1.23 1029 1.95 x 1011 1.5 1734 1113 0.117 9.88 6.7 x 10−3 0.993 2.5:1 Primary -21.5 155 2.3 x 1010 1.96 4000 1.9 x 1012 2.0 9506 9220 Secondary -20.55 56.6 5.9 x 109 1.61 2000 6.5 x 1011 2.0 4800 13101 2.9 x 10−2 2.48 9.3 x 10−4 0.9908 aradii are in units of pc. bthe top masses are in units of M⊙, and the bottom masses are normalized such that the total secondary mass is 1.0 -- 29 -- Table 2. Synopsis of Experiments Type Mass Ratio κ fdrag Effect on Secondary Fiducial Vary Drag Inner Eta Non-Plunging Orbits Treecode Weinberg 100:1 10:1 2.5:1 100:1 100:1 10:1 2.5:1 100:1 10:1 2.5:1 10:1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 N/A 0.084 Intact Intact Disrupted Intact Intact Intact Intact Disrupted Intact Intact Intact Disrupted Disrupted Table 3. King Model Galaxy Parameters Mass Ratio Galaxy Mv a W0 rcore b Massb b ρ0 10:1 Primary -21.5 Secondary -19.5 9.5 9.5 3.15 1.0 10.0 .0032 1.0 .01 aMagnitude is a free parameter chosen to compare the η model results bnormalized such that the mass and rcore of the secondary is 1.0 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 A -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 C -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 3 2 1 0 3 2.5 2 1.5 B -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 D -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 400 200 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Secondary Crossing Times 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 0.96 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 0.96 0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200 core crossing times -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -15 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) (pc) 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 Treecode Treecode -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4 -5 -10 -5 -10 King Model King Model -1 0 1 2 Log(r) pc 3 4
astro-ph/0609688	3	0609	2006-11-28T18:35:49	WASP-1b and WASP-2b: Two new transiting exoplanets detected with SuperWASP and SOPHIE	[ "astro-ph" ]	We have detected low-amplitude radial-velocity variations in two stars, USNO-B1.0 1219-0005465 (GSC 02265-00107 = WASP-1) and USNO-B1.0 0964-0543604 (GSC 00522-01199 = WASP-2). Both stars were identified as being likely host stars of transiting exoplanets in the 2004 SuperWASP wide-field transit survey. Using the newly-commissioned radial-velocity spectrograph SOPHIE at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence, we found that both objects exhibit reflex orbital radial-velocity variations with amplitudes characteristic of planetary-mass companions and in-phase with the photometric orbits. Line-bisector studies rule out faint blended binaries as the cause of either the radial-velocity variations or the transits. We perform preliminary spectral analyses of the host stars, which together with their radial-velocity variations and fits to the transit light curves, yield estimates of the planetary masses and radii. WASP-1b and WASP-2b have orbital periods of 2.52 and 2.15 days respectively. Given mass estimates for their F7V and K1V primaries we derive planet masses 0.80 to 0.98 and 0.81 to 0.95 times that of Jupiter respectively. WASP-1b appears to have an inflated radius of at least 1.33 R_Jup, whereas WASP-2b has a radius in the range 0.65 to 1.26 R_Jup.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 7 (2006) Printed 21 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) WASP-1b and WASP-2b: Two new transiting exoplanets detected with SuperWASP and SOPHIE A. Collier Cameron1⋆, F. Bouchy12,13, G. H´ebrard12, P. Maxted5, D. Pollacco2, F. Pont 10, I. Skillen8, B. Smalley5, R. A. Street2, R.G. West 3, D.M. Wilson 5, S. Aigrain6, D.J. Christian2, W.I. Clarkson4,15, B. Enoch4, A. Evans5, A. Fitzsimmons2, M. Fleenor16, M. Gillon14, C.A. Haswell4, L. Hebb1, C. Hellier5, S.T. Hodgkin6, K. Horne1, J. Irwin6, S.R. Kane7, F.P. Keenan2, B. Loeillet11, T.A. Lister1,5, M. Mayor10, C. Moutou11, A.J. Norton4, J. Osborne3, N. Parley4, D. Queloz10, R. Ryans2, A.H.M.J. Triaud1, S. Udry10, and P.J. Wheatley 9 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS, UK. 2ARC, Main Physics Building, School of Mathematics & Physics, Queen's University, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK. 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK. 5Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG. 6Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK. 7Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, 211 Bryant Space Science Center, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055, USA. 8Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado de Correos 321, E-38700 Santa Cruz de la Palma, Tenerife, Spain. 9Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. 10Observatoire de Gen`eve, Universit´e de Gen`eve, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland. 11Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, BP 8, 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France 12Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS (UMR 7095) -- Universit´e Pierre & Marie Curie, 98bis bvd. Arago, 75014 Paris, France 13Observatoire de Haute-Provence, 04870 St Michel l'Observatoire, France 14Institut d'Astrophysique et de G´eophysique, Universit´e de Li`ege, All´ee du 6 Aout 17, 4000 Li`ege, Belgium 15STScI, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 16Volunteer Observatory, 10305 Mantooth Lane Knoxville, TN 37932, USA Accepted 2006 November 28. Received 2006 November 7; in original form 2006 September 22 ABSTRACT We have detected low-amplitude radial-velocity variations in two stars, USNO-B1.0 1219-0005465 (GSC 02265-00107 = WASP-1) and USNO-B1.0 0964-0543604 (GSC 00522-01199 = WASP-2). Both stars were identified as being likely host stars of tran- siting exoplanets in the 2004 SuperWASP wide-field transit survey. Using the newly- commissioned radial-velocity spectrograph SOPHIE at the Observatoire de Haute- Provence, we found that both objects exhibit reflex orbital radial-velocity variations with amplitudes characteristic of planetary-mass companions and in-phase with the photometric orbits. Line-bisector studies rule out faint blended binaries as the cause of either the radial-velocity variations or the transits. We perform preliminary spectral analyses of the host stars, which together with their radial-velocity variations and fits to the transit light curves, yield estimates of the planetary masses and radii. WASP-1b and WASP-2b have orbital periods of 2.52 and 2.15 days respectively. Given mass esti- mates for their F7V and K1V primaries we derive planet masses 0.80 to 0.98 and 0.81 to 0.95 times that of Jupiter respectively. WASP-1b appears to have an inflated radius of at least 1.33 RJup, whereas WASP-2b has a radius in the range 0.65 to 1.26 RJup. Key words: methods: data analysis -- stars: planetary systems -- techniques: radial velocities -- techniques: photometric 6 0 0 2 v o N 8 2 3 v 8 8 6 9 0 6 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a ⋆ E-mail:[email protected] c(cid:13) 2006 RAS 2 A. Collier Cameron et al 1 INTRODUCTION Extra-solar planets that transit their parent stars are of key interest because their masses and radii can be deter- mined directly, providing clues to their internal compo- sitions (Guillot et al. 2006). They define the mass-radius- separation relation for irradiated giant planets (Mazeh et al. 2005). They provide unique insights into their thermal prop- erties (e.g. Charbonneau et al. 2005; Deming et al. 2005; Deming et al. 2006) and the chemical compositions of their atmospheres (Charbonneau et al. 2002; Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003; Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004). The first exoplanet found to exhibit transits, HD 209458b (Charbonneau et al. 2000; Henry et al. 2000), was initially discovered using the radial-velocity method that has to date yielded the vast majority of the 210 known exo- planets. Its inflated radius (Brown et al. 2001) presents a challenge to theories of the structure and evolution of irra- diated exoplanets. New radial-velocity discoveries are rou- tinely subjected to careful photometric followup at around the predicted times of transit. Indeed, recent radial-velocity surveys targeting bright stars of high metallicity with the specific goal of discovering new hot Jupiters have revealed two new transiting planets in the last two years (Sato et al. 2005; Bouchy et al. 2005). Transiting planets thus comprise roughly 10% of all the hot Jupiters with orbital periods un- der 5 days or so, which is consistent with expectations for randomly-oriented orbits. The complementary approach is to look for transits first, then to seek evidence of their planetary nature in radial-velocity followup observations. The OGLE project pi- oneered this approach, which has to date yielded five transit- ing exoplanet candidates for which radial-velocity variations have been detected with amplitudes indicative of planetary- mass companions (Konacki et al. 2003; Bouchy et al. 2004, Konacki et al. 2004; Pont et al. 2004; Konacki et al. 2005). Several teams have embarked on ultra-wide field searches for transiting exoplanets. In this complementary approach, small-aperture CCD imaging systems coupled to commercial camera optics secure light curves of millions of stars. The TrES survey has so far yielded two transit- ing planets (Alonso et al. 2004; O'Donovan et al. 2006b). The XO survey and HAT surveys have so far found one each (McCullough et al. 2006; Bakos et al. 2006). Here we present the first two transiting exoplanets from the Super- WASP survey. The hardware, data analysis pipeline and archive methodology for this project are described in detail by Pollacco et al. (2006). In a series of recent papers, Christian et al. (2006), Street et al. (2006) and Lister et al. (2006) presented transit candidates from the inaugural 2004 May -- September observ- ing season of the five SuperWASP wide-field survey cameras that were operating at that time. The light curves of some 1.1 × 106 stars in the magnitude range 8 < V < 13 were searched for periodic shallow transits, and several dozen plausible candidates were identified for detailed followup. The candidate selection methodology is described in detail in these papers and by Collier Cameron et al. (2006). Table 1. Target list for SOPHIE radial-velocity followup pro- gramme. The 1SWASP identifiers give the J2000 stellar coor- dinates. The second column gives the number Ncl of SOPHIE observations that were required to classify and eliminate each non-planetary system, and the total number of observations for planet-bearing systems. Half the astrophysical false positives were eliminated after a single observation. Five more were eliminated after a second observation, leaving 8 narrow, single-lined targets. 1SWASP ID Ncl SOPHIE followup classification J161732.90+242119.0 J165949.13+265346.1 J174118.30+383656.3 J181252.03+461851.6 J183104.01+323942.7 J184303.62+462656.4 J203054.12+062546.4 J204125.28+163911.8 J205027.33+064022.9 J205308.03+192152.7 J210318.01+080117.8 J211608.42+163220.3 J214151.03+260158.5 J215802.14+253006.1 J222317.60+130125.8 J223320.44+370139.1 J223651.20+221000.8 J234318.41+295556.5 J002040.07+315923.7 J005225.90+203451.2 J010151.11+314254.7 J025500.31+281134.0 J031103.19+211141.4 J051221.34+300634.9 SB1 SB2 Late-type giant Planet host: WASP-2 Late-type giant 3 No detectable RV variation 1 Rapid rotator 2 2 No detectable RV variation 1 1 9 1 3 No detectable RV variation 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 7 3 No detectable RV variation 1 Rapid rotator 4 No detectable RV variation 1 Rapid rotator 2 Multiple system SB2 Line bisector variable SB2 Late-type giant SB2 Late-type giant SB2 SB2 SB1 Planet host: WASP-1 2 SOPHIE AND OFXB OBSERVATIONS We conducted a radial-velocity survey of a sample of high- priority SuperWASP transit candidates, using the newly- commissioned SOPHIE spectrograph (Bouchy et al. 2006) on the 1.93-m telescope at the Observatoire de Haute- Provence during the four nights from 2006 August 31 to 2006 September 3, and between September 12 and 19 dur- ing the science verification phase of SOPHIE. SOPHIE is a bench-mounted, fibre-fed spectrograph built on the same de- sign principles as the HARPS instrument (Pepe et al. 2004) on the ESO 3.6-m telescope at La Silla. The spectrograph's thermal environment is carefully controlled, with the aim of achieving radial-velocity measurements with stability better than 2 m s−1. For the targets studied here, a radial-velocity precision of 10 to 15 m s−1 is adequate to establish or re- ject the planetary nature of a transit candidate. We there- fore elected to use SOPHIE's High-Efficiency (HE) mode, which has resolving power λ/∆λ = 35000. The CCD de- tector records 39 spectral orders spanning the wavelength range from 387 to 694 nm. Radial velocities are determined by cross-correlation with a mask spectrum matched to the spectral type of the target (Baranne et al. 1996; Pepe et al. c(cid:13) 2006 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 Transiting exoplanets WASP-1b and WASP-2b 3 Table 2. Journal of radial-velocity measurements of WASP-1 and WASP-2. The 1SWASP identifiers give the J2000 stellar coordinates of the photometric apertures; the USNO-B1.0 number denotes the star for which the radial-velocity measurements were secured. The uncertainties given here include 10.0 m s−1 systematic error in added in quadrature to the formal photon-noise error. The fifth and sixth columns give the FWHM of the CCF dip and the contrast of the dip as a fraction of the weighted mean continuum level. The signal-to-noise ratio near 550 nm is given in column 6, and the spectral type of the cross-correlation mask in column 7. HJD texp (s) Vr km s−1 FWHM Contrast km s−1 % S:N Mask Sp. type Notes 1SWASP J002040.07+315923.7: USNO-B1.0 1219-0005465 = GSC 02265-00107 = WASP-1 2453979.6311 2453980.5558 2453981.5649 2453981.6752 2453982.4167 2453982.5843 2453982.6758 2400 −13.425 ± 0.011 2400 −13.484 ± 0.012 2400 −13.587 ± 0.016 1219 −13.520 ± 0.021 2100 −13.376 ± 0.014 2100 −13.412 ± 0.013 2407 −13.398 ± 0.012 During transit Variable cloud Variable cloud 37.7 36.5 25.0 21.4 31.5 33.3 35.0 25.3 21.7 17.1 13.8 17.8 19.3 22.0 9.7 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.8 10.0 10.0 G2 G2 G2 G2 G2 G2 G2 1SWASP J203054.12+062546.4: USNO-B1.0 0964-0543604 = GSC 00522-01199 = WASP-2 2453981.5065 2453982.3786 2453982.4962 2453991.3817 2453991.5102 2453996.3529 2453996.4301 2453997.3824 2453998.3415 1906 −28.125 ± 0.186 2500 −27.711 ± 0.012 2500 −27.736 ± 0.013 1200 −27.780 ± 0.011 1200 −27.812 ± 0.011 1200 −28.037 ± 0.011 1200 −28.020 ± 0.012 1500 −27.723 ± 0.012 1200 −27.987 ± 0.011 12.4 37.3 39.4 45.0 41.6 37.5 35.4 36.7 40.2 2.2 19.1 17.0 30.2 29.8 25.0 24.4 24.5 25.3 K5 K5 K5 K5 K5 K5 K5 K5 K5 8.9 93 9.0 8.8 8.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 During transit Variable to heavy cloud 2002). Automatic data reduction at the telescope allows highly efficient candidate selection and data assessment. The target list was drawn from the candidate papers of Christian et al. (2006), Street et al. (2006) and Lister et al. (2006), and from further candidate lists covering different regions of the sky for which candidate papers are currently in preparation. Table 1 gives a brief summary of all targets observed and the outcomes of the SOPHIE observations. A full investigation of the natures of the other objects observed during this radial-velocity study is currently in progress. The results of this investigation and its implica- tions for improving our pre-selection criteria will be pub- lished in a companion paper. Here we present the two targets in the survey sample that have single, narrow-lined cross- correlation functions (CCF) with radial velocity variations in agreement with an oscillation precisely phased with the ephemeris predicted from SuperWASP data. The amplitudes of these radial velocity oscillations are less than a few hun- dred m s−1 and no significant line-bisector variations are detected (see Section 5). Thus we can conclude that each of these two stars harbours a transiting planet. The radial- velocity measurements for the two stars are listed in Table 1. A complete transit of WASP-2 was observed using a CCD camera with R-band filters on the 60-cm telescope of the Observatoire Fran¸cois-Xavier Bagnoud at St-Luc (OFXB), on the night of 2006 September 12/13 UT. A full transit of WASP-1 was observed on the morning of 2006 October 2 UT using an SBIG ST10XME CCD camera with R-band filter on the 0.35-m Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope at the Volunteer Observatory at Knoxville, Tennessee. c(cid:13) 2006 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 3 STELLAR PARAMETERS The extracted SOPHIE spectra were used for a preliminary analysis using the uclsyn spectral synthesis package and ATLAS9 models without convective overshooting (Castelli et al. 1997). The Hα, Nai D and Mgi b lines were used as diagnostics of both Teff and log g. The abundances do not appear to be substantially different from solar. We used these values to infer the radii and masses of the stars, as listed in Table 3. For WASP-1, comparison with the stellar evolution models of Girardi et al. (2000) gives maximum- likelihood values M∗ = 1.15M⊙ and R∗ = 1.24R⊙, but many models with 1.06 < M∗/M⊙ < 1.39 and 1.04 < R∗/R⊙ < 1.92 satisfy the spectroscopic constraints, because the main sequence is very wide in that temperature range. The radius and mass estimates for WASP-2 are better con- strained. We have also used the available BV and 2MASS photometry to estimate Teff using the Infrared Flux Method (Blackwell & Shallis 1977), which gave results in agreement with that obtained from the spectral analysis. 4 PLANETARY PARAMETERS The formal precision of the radial-velocity observations de- pends on the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum, the sharp- ness and density of the stellar lines, and the scattered-light background in the instrument. The formal errors on the ve- locity measures are given by the semi-empirical estimator σRV = 1.7√FWHM/(S:N*Contrast). The Contrast param- eter quantifies the contrast of the CCF peak against the additional background signal from light leakage into the as- 4 A. Collier Cameron et al Table 3. Stellar parameters derived from preliminary spectral analyses with uclsyn. Masses and radii are derived from the Padua models of Girardi et al. (2000) assuming [Fe/H]= 0.1 ± 0.2 to reflect the uncertainty in the metallicity. Parameter WASP-1 WASP-2 GSC WASP V (mag) Spectral type Teff (K) log g MV (mag) M∗/M⊙ R∗/R⊙ 02265-00107 00522-01199 11.79 F7V 6200 ± 200 4.3 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 0.4 1.15+0.24 −0.09 1.24+0.68 −0.20 11.98 K1V 5200 ± 200 4.3 ± 0.3 6.2 ± 0.5 0.79+0.15 −0.04 0.78 ± 0.06 yet incomplete spectrograph enclosure. Because we did not use simultaneous thorium-argon wavelength calibration, the accuracy of the radial-velocity measurements is limited by the stability of the spectrograph over the 2 to 3 hours be- tween successive thorium-argon calibration exposures, con- sidering that its thermal control was not yet optimized. Tests performed during the commissioning of the instrument indi- cate that the velocity drift during a night is typically in the range ±10 m s−1. Taking into consideration additional un- certainties coming from the wavelength solution of the H.E. mode and the guiding noise, we estimated that during our run, the systematic RV errors were 10 m/s. Although the wavelength calibration may vary only slowly during a given night, the drifts may reasonably be expected to be uncor- related from one night to the next. Guiding noise should be uncorrelated even between successive observations. Since most targets were observed only once per night, we treat the additional systematic error as uncorrelated. We there- fore used the quadrature sum of the formal and systematic errors (Table 2) for all model fits. The transits of WASP-1 and WASP-2 can be timed with a precision of about 20 minutes from the 2004 SuperWASP data set. The first and last transits in this data set are sep- arated by about 120 days, so the accumulated uncertainties in the transit timings at the epoch of the 2006 SOPHIE, OFXB and Volunteer Observatory observations are no more than a few hours. There is no ambiguity in number of cycles between the 2004 and 2006 data sets. The OFXB and Volun- teer Observatory transit observations establish the improved photometric ephemerides in Table 4. We estimated the stellar and planetary radii and the planetary masses by minimising χ2 for the photometric and radial-velocity measurements simultaneously with respect to the analytic model of Mandel & Agol (2002) for small planets (Rp/R∗ < 0.1), assuming that the planets have cir- cular orbits. In modelling the SuperWASP photometry we used linear limb darkening coefficients u = 0.51 and 0.63 (van Hamme 1993) for WASP-1 and WASP-2 respectively. For the more precise data from OFXB and Volunteer Ob- servatory we used the 4-coefficient model of Claret (2000). We used a bootstrap analysis to estimate the errors on the parameters of the model. This entails taking the residu- Table 4. Results of simultaneous minimum-χ2 circular-orbit fits to the photometric and radial-velocity data for WASP-1 and WASP-2. The parameters of the lightcurve model are given in terms of the radius of the star and planet (R∗ and Rp, respec- tively), the separation of the stars (a) and the inclination (i). The total number of degrees of freedom, including the NRV radial- velocity measurements, is Ndf . The contribution of the radial- velocity data to the value of χ2 is χ2 RV, using the errors given in Table 2. Data in transit are given reduced weight. Standard errors on the parameters are derived using a bootstrap analysis as described in the text. Parameter WASP-1b WASP-2b Transit HJD Period (days) γ (km s−1) K1 (m s−1) a (AU) b = a cos i/R∗ Rp/R∗ R∗/a Ndf χ2 NRV χ2 RV M∗(M⊙) Mp/MJup Rp/RJup 2453912.514 ± 0.001 2453991.5146 ± 0.0044 2.51995 ± 0.00001 −13.503 ± 0.009 115 ± 11 0.0369 -- 0.0395 0 -- 0.8 0.093 -- 0.104 0.168 -- 0.260 961 1420 -- 1449 7 11.6 2.152226 ± 0.000004 −27.863 ± 0.007 155 ± 7 0.0296 -- 0.0318 0 -- 0.8 0.119 -- 0.140 0.086 -- 0.132 1013 1627.2 -- 1647.1 9 13.4 (1.06 -- 1.39) (0.73 -- 0.94) (0.80 -- 0.98)±0.11 (0.81 -- 0.95)±0.04 1.33 -- 2.53 0.65 -- 1.26 als from the optimum light-curve fit, applying an arbitrary phase shift and restoring the model transit at phase zero. This preserves both outliers and the correlated noise char- acteristics of the WASP data. The synthetic radial-velocity data are generated by sampling the best fit radial-velocity curve at the observed phases and adding gaussian random deviates with the appropriate standard error. These syn- thetic data are then fitted repeatedly, to recover the distri- butions of the fitted parameter values. There is a strong degeneracy between the impact pa- rameter b = a cos i/R∗ and the parameter R∗/a when fitting planet transit lightcurves of the quality presented here. We therefore present the results of minimum-χ2 fits with the value of b fixed at values b = 0 (corresponding to the mini- mum radius of the star) and b = 0.8 for both stars. Models with b > 0.8 give noticeably worse fits to the lightcurves. The radial-velocity measurements and minimum-χ2 fits are shown as a function of orbital phase in Fig. 1. The sinu- soidal variation in radial velocity is clearly seen. The light curves and minimum-χ2 fits to the phases around the tran- sits are shown in Fig. 2. The parameters of the best fits are given in Table 4. An additional 50 m s−1 was added in quadrature to the uncertainties of radial-velocity observa- tions during transits, to allow for the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect (Rossiter 1924; McLaughlin 1924). In spite of this, the contribution of the radial-velocity data to the total value of χ2 in both stars is larger than expected. WASP-1 yields a spectroscopic χ2 s = 11.6 for 5 degrees of freedom, while WASP-2 gives χ2 s = 13.4 for 7 c(cid:13) 2006 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 Transiting exoplanets WASP-1b and WASP-2b 5 Figure 1. Radial velocities of WASP-1and WASP-2 plotted against barycentric Julian date (upper) and folded on the photometric ephemerides (lower). In all panels the solid line represents the best-fitting circular-orbit solution. degrees of freedom. More extensive observations will be re- quired to establish the cause of this small additional "jit- ter" in the radial-velocity measurements. A common cause of such radial-velocity "jitter" is rotationally-modulated dis- tortion of the line profiles arising from magnetic activity in the stellar chromosphere and photosphere. While the S:N in the bluest orders of the SOPHIE spectra is insufficient for us to measure the chromospheric emission cores in the Ca II HK lines in any meaningful way, both stars have narrow CCFs that suggest v sin i values less than ∼ 5 km s−1 and hence low to moderate activity levels. We allow for this additional variability in the bootstrap error analysis by adding 12 m s−1 of additional radial-velocity jitter to the synthetic radial- velocity data. We note that this amount of jitter is within the ranges determined empirically for F and K stars with low to moderate levels of chromospheric activity (Wright 2005), and conclude that chromospheric activity is a likely cause. Also given in Table 4 are the masses and radii of WASP- 1b and WASP-2b derived using the best-fit model parame- ters. Despite the ambiguities in the light-curve solution it is clear that the data presented show that WASP-1 and WASP- 2 have planetary-mass companions with gas-giant radii. 5 FAINT BLENDED-BINARY SCENARIOS Although many types of stellar binary system can mimic a planet-like transit signal, most are easily eliminated. Strong rotational broadening implies tidal synchronisation by a massive companion. Grazing double or single-lined stel- lar binaries reveal their nature after one or two observa- tions. Triple systems can, however, mimic transiting planets in a way that is difficult to eliminate (Torres et al. 2004; O'Donovan et al. 2006a). A bright single F, G or K star with a much fainter, physically associated eclipsing-binary companion will apparently produce shallow eclipses. If the c(cid:13) 2006 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 Figure 2. Transit profiles of WASP-1 (upper) and WASP-2 (lower), fitted with the optimum limb-darkened models with pa- rameters as in Table 4. Small symbols denote 2004 season Super- WASP photometry; filled circles show the Volunteer Observatory light curve of 2006 October 1 (WASP-1) and the OFXB light curve of 2006 September 12 (WASP-2). bright primary has narrow absorption lines, the faint bi- nary's lines will produce apparent periodic velocity shifts in the combined spectrum, in phase with the photometric or- bit. The apparent shift occurs because the broadened lines of the tidally-synchronised primary of the eclipsing binary 6 A. Collier Cameron et al are Doppler shifted by orbital motions into the wings of the composite line profile. Several tests can reveal this type of system. Because the spectral types of the bright star and the cooler eclipsing bi- nary are very different, cross-correlation masks of different spectral types tend to yield different orbital velocity ampli- tudes (Santos et al. 2002). We computed the CCF with dif- ferent masks without significant change in the radial-velocity values. Because the apparent Doppler shift arises through a variable asymmetry in the line wings, line-bisector analysis of the cross-correlation function is also an effective probe for this type of system (Queloz et al. 2001). When the fainter, moving spectrum is broadened by rotation, the induced ve- locity shift is sufficiently weak that the apparent velocity variation tends to be small unless the binary's lines are strong enough to give a clearly-visible asymmetry in the combined line profile. The change in line-bisector velocity from the wings to the core of the line tends to be greater than the induced velocity amplitude. We measured the asymme- tries of the cross-correlation function peaks using the line- bisector method of Queloz et al. (2001). For WASP-1 and WASP-2 we found the scatter in bisector velocities from the wings to the core of the CCF profile to be substantially less than the measured orbital velocity amplitude, and un- correlated with orbital phase. A third candidate, 1SWASP J210318.01+080117.8, failed this test and was eliminated as a planet candidate. Therefore, we can eliminate the scenario "bright single star plus faint, late-type short-period eclipsing binary" with confidence for WASP-1 and WASP-2. While other more in- tricate scenarios are possible, we were not able to contrive any that could explain both the photometric and the veloc- ity signals while remaining credible. At the 380 and 140 pc distances of WASP-1 and WASP- 2, it should be possible to resolve such binary companions at separations of a few tens of AU or more with the help of adaptive optics. As an additional line of defence against this type of astrophysical false positive, we secured high- resolution H-band images of both targets with the NAOMI adaptive-optics system on the 4.2-m William Herschel Tele- scope on the nights of 2006 September 6 and 7. Images with corrected FWHM = 0.25 arcsec reveal that WASP-1 has a stellar companion 4.7 arcsec to the north and 3.7 magnitudes fainter at H. The SOPHIE fibre aperture has a diameter of 3 arcsec. Seeing and guiding errors may allow some of the companion's light into the fibre, but we can be fairly confident that the contamination is not significant at visible wavelengths. Even if the companion were an eclips- ing binary, it would be unlikely to mimic the radial-velocity signature of a planet, and indeed the line-bisector analysis eliminates this possibility. NAOMI H-band images taken on 2006 September 7 with corrected FWHM=0.2 arcsec, and using the OSCA coronagraph system, show that WASP-2 has a stellar companion 2.7 magnitudes fainter at H located 0.7" to the east. This falls within the SOPHIE fibre aper- ture. Additional NAOMI images secured during transit on 2006 September 10 20:00 to 20:20 UT with 0.2 arcsec cor- rected FWHM showed no sign of the ∼1.5-mag deep eclipse in the companion that would be needed to mimic a transit. Future AO observations should reveal whether these faint stellar companions (which are the only objects visible be- Figure 3. Mass-orbital separation diagram for the 14 known transiting exoplanets. WASP-1b and WASP-2b follow the general trend with only high-mass planets surviving at small separations. (From http://obswww.unige.ch/∼pont/TRANSITS.htm) sides WASP-1 and WASP-2 in their respective NAOMI fields of view) are chance alignments or common-proper-motion companions. 6 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We have detected the presence of radial-velocity varia- tions in two exoplanetary transit candidates. Our prelim- inary analysis yields masses between 0.8 and 1.0 MJup for both planets. WASP-1b and WASP-2b lie between the "hot Jupiters" and the "very hot Jupiters" in the mass-orbital separation diagram for transiting hot Jupiters, (Fig. 3).Their intermediate masses appear consistent with the general trend toward high masses at the smallest orbital separations noted by Mazeh et al. (2005). WASP-2b in par- ticular lies close to the minimum separation at which planets in this mass range survive, making it a good candidate for future mass-loss studies. The radius of WASP-1b, which or- bits an F7V star, is poorly constrained by the SuperWASP data alone, but appears to be at least 1.33 RJup. WASP-1b seems thus to be an expanded, low-density planet, similar to HD 209458b and HAT-P-1b (Bakos et al. 2006). Addi- tional photometry of WASP-2b, which orbits a K1 dwarf at a slightly smaller orbital separation yields a radius close to that of Jupiter, suggesting a substantially higher density. Additional high-precision photometry is needed to refine the radii and densities of both planets; indeed, precise radius es- timates have recently been derived from high-precision pho- tometry by Shporer et al. (2006) and Charbonneau et al. (2006), confirming the oversized nature of WASP-1b. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to all the staff of Observatoire de Haute Provence for their efforts, their efficiency and their support on the new instrument SOPHIE and for the photometric observation with the 1.20-m telescope, and in particular H. Le Coroller and R. Giraud. We acknowledge the award of Director's Discretionary Time at Haute-Provence for addi- tional observations of WASP-2 in SOPHIE science verifica- tion time, without which the detection could not have been c(cid:13) 2006 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7 Transiting exoplanets WASP-1b and WASP-2b 7 Henry G. W., Marcy G. W., Butler R. P., Vogt S. S., 2000, ApJ, 529, L41 Konacki M., Torres G., Jha S., Sasselov D. D., 2003, Na- ture, 421, 507 Konacki M., et al., 2004, ApJ, 609, L37 Konacki M., Torres G., Sasselov D. D., Jha S., 2005, ApJ, 624, 372 Lister T. A., et al., 2006, MNRAS, Submitted Mandel K., Agol E., 2002, ApJ, 580, L171 Mazeh T., Zucker S., Pont F., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 955 McCullough P. R., et al., 2006, ApJ, 648, 1228 McLaughlin D. B., 1924, ApJ, 60, 22 O'Donovan F. T., et al., 2006b, ApJ, 651, L61 O'Donovan F. T., et al., 2006a, ApJ, 644, 1237 Pepe F., et al., 2002, A&A, 388, 632 Pepe F., Mayor M., Queloz D., et al., 2004, A&A, 423, 385 Pollacco D. L., et al., 2006, PASP, 118, 1407 Pont F., Bouchy F., Queloz D., Santos N. C., Melo C., Mayor M., Udry S., 2004, A&A, 426, L15 Queloz D., et al., 2001, A&A, 379, 279 Rossiter R. A., 1924, ApJ, 60, 15 Santos N. C., et al., 2002, A&A, 392, 215 Sato B., et al., 2005, ApJ, 633, 465 Shporer A., Tamuz O., Zucker S., Mazeh T., 2006, MNRAS, Submitted (arXiv:astro-ph/0610556 ) Street R. A., et al., 2006, MNRAS, Submitted Torres G., Konacki M., Sasselov D. D., Jha S., 2004, ApJ, 614, 979 van Hamme W., 1993, AJ, 106, 2096 Vidal-Madjar A., et al., 2003, Nature, 422, 143 Vidal-Madjar A., et al., 2004, ApJ, 604, L69 Wilson D. M., et al., 2006, PASP, 118, 1245 Wright J. T., 2005, PASP, 117, 657 This paper has been typeset from a TEX/ LATEX file prepared by the author. secured. We extend our special thanks to the team of the Ob- servatoire Fran¸cois-Xavier Bagnoud at St-Luc, and in par- ticular to Brice-Olivier Demory and Fr´ed´eric Malmann. Ad- ditional partial observations of the 2006 September 12 tran- sit of WASP-2 were secured at short notice with the OHP 1.2-m telescope. The WASP project is funded and operated by Queen's University Belfast, the Universities of Keele, St Andrews and Leicester, the Open University, the Isaac New- ton Group, the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, the South African Astronomical Observatory and by PPARC. In recognition of the considerable regional support given to the WASP project on La Palma, we would like to associate the pseudonym Garafia-1 with the planet of WASP-1. AMHJT was supported by an Undergraduate Research Bursary from the the Nuffield Foundation. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California In- stitute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foun- dation. This research has made use of the VizieR catalogue access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France. We are grateful to the referee, Dr. Chris Tinney, for numerous helpful suggestions to improve and clarify the manuscript. REFERENCES Alonso R., et al., 2004, ApJ, 613, L153 Bakos G. A., et al., 2006, ApJ, In press (arXiv: astro- ph/0609369) Baranne A., et al., 1996, A&AS, 119, 373 Blackwell D. E., Shallis M. J., 1977, MNRAS, 180, 177 Bouchy F., Pont F., Santos N. C., Melo C., Mayor M., Queloz D., Udry S., 2004, A&A, 421, L13 Bouchy F., et al., 2005, A&A, 444, L15 Bouchy F., The Sophie Team 2006, in Arnold L., Bouchy F., Moutou C., eds, Tenth Anniversary of 51 Peg-b: Status of and prospects for hot Jupiter studies, pp 319 -- 325 Brown T. M., Charbonneau D., Gilliland R. L., Noyes R. W., Burrows A., 2001, ApJ, 552, 699 Castelli F., Gratton R. G., Kurucz R. L., 1997, A&A, 318, 841 Charbonneau D., Brown T. M., Latham D. W., Mayor M., 2000, ApJ, 529, L45 Charbonneau D., Brown T. M., Noyes R. W., Gilliland R. L., 2002, ApJ, 568, 377 Charbonneau D., et al., 2005, ApJ, 626, 523 Charbonneau D., Winn J. N., Everett M. E., Latham D. W., Holman M. J., Esquerdo G. A., O'Donovan F. T., 2006, ApJ, Submitted (arXiv:astro-ph/0610589) Christian D. J., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1117 Claret A., 2000, A&A, 363, 1081 Collier Cameron A., et al., 2006, MNRAS, In press. (arXiv: astro-ph/0609418) Deming D., Harrington J., Seager S., Richardson L. J., 2006, ApJ, 644, 560 Deming D., Seager S., Richardson L. J., Harrington J., 2005, Nature, 434, 740 Girardi L., Bressan A., Bertelli G., Chiosi C., 2000, A&AS, 141, 371 Guillot T., et al., 2006, A&A, 453, L21 c(cid:13) 2006 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 7
0803.1432	1	0803	2008-03-10T15:06:43	GINS: a new tool for VLBI Geodesy and Astrometry	[ "astro-ph" ]	In the framework of the "Groupe de Recherches de G\'eod\'esie Spatiale" (GRGS), a rigorous combination of the data from five space geodetic techniques (VLBI, GPS, SLR, LLR and DORIS) is routinely applied to simultaneously determine a Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF) and Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP). This analysis is conducted with the software package GINS which has the capability to process data from all five techniques together. Such a combination at the observation level should ultimately facilitate fine geophysical studies of the global Earth system. In this project, Bordeaux Observatory is in charge of the VLBI data analysis, while satellite geodetic data are processed by other groups. In this paper, we present (i) details about the VLBI analysis undertaken with GINS, and (ii) the results obtained for the EOP during the period 2005-2006. We also compare this EOP solution with the IVS (International VLBI Service for geodesy and astrometry) analysis coordinator combined results. The agreement is at the 0.2 mas level, comparable to that of the other IVS analysis centers, which demonstrates the capability of the GINS software for VLBI analysis.	astro-ph	astro-ph	GINS: a new tool for VLBI Geodesy and Astrometry G. Bourda1, P. Charlot1, R. Biancale2 (1) Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l'Univers - Universit´e Bordeaux I Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux - UMR5804/CNRS - Floirac, France (2) Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales - Groupe de Recherche de G´eod´esie Spatiale Toulouse, France In the framework of the Groupe de Abstract. Recherches de G´eod´esie Spatiale (GRGS), a rig- orous combination of the data from five space geodetic techniques (VLBI, GPS, SLR, LLR and DORIS) is routinely applied to simultaneously determine a Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF) and Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP). This analysis is conducted with the software package GINS which has the capability to process data from all five techniques together. Such a combi- nation at the observation level should ultimately facilitate fine geophysical studies of the global Earth system. In this project, Bordeaux Ob- servatory is in charge of the VLBI data analy- sis, while satellite geodetic data are processed by other groups. In this paper, we present (i) details about the VLBI analysis undertaken with GINS, and (ii) the results obtained for the EOP dur- ing the period 2005–2006. We also compare this EOP solution with the IVS (International VLBI Service for geodesy and astrometry) analysis co- ordinator combined results. The agreement is at the 0.2 mas level, comparable to that of the other IVS analysis centers, which demonstrates the ca- pability of the GINS software for VLBI analysis. reference Keywords. systems, Earth rotation, VLBI astrometry, geodesy, 1 Introduction The software package GINS (G´eod´esie par Int´egrations Num´eriques Simultan´ees) is a multi-technique software initially developed by the GRGS/CNES (Groupe de Recherches de G´eod´esie Spatiale – Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France) for analysing satel- lite geodetic data, and extended at later stages for analysing data from other space geodetic techniques (Meyer et al., 2000). Currently, GPS (Global Positionning System), DORIS (Doppler Orbitography and Radio-positioning Integrated by Satellite), SLR (Satellite Laser Ranging), LLR (Lunar Laser Ranging) and VLBI (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) observations can be processed with GINS. The parameters that can be estimated comprise satellite orbits around the Earth or another body of the solar system, gravity field coefficients, Earth Orientation Pa- rameters (EOP), station coordinates, or other geophysical parameters. The well-known GRIM5 and EIGEN gravity field models were produced with GINS in particular (Biancale et al., 2000; Reigber et al., 2002). A rigorous combination of all the above space geodetic data has been developed to estimate sta- tion coordinates and EOP simultaneously from all techniques in the framework of the IERS (In- ternational Earth Rotation and Reference Sys- tems Service) multi-technique combination pilot project. In this analysis, observations of the different astro-geodetic techniques (VLBI, GPS, SLR, LLR and DORIS) are first processed sepa- rately using GINS. The weekly datum-free nor- mal equation matrices derived from the anal- yses of the different techniques are then com- bined to estimate station coordinates and EOP (Coulot et al., 2007; Gambis et al., 2007). Re- sults are made available to the IERS in the form of SINEX files. In this project, the VLBI data are analysed in Bordeaux, while the satellite geodetic data are processed either in Toulouse (for GPS, DORIS and LLR) or Grasse (for SLR), with the final combination produced at Paris Ob- servatory (see Figure 1 for more details about the project organization). The strength of the method is in the use of a unique software for all techniques with iden- tical and up-to-date models and standards, en- suring homogeneous and reliable combined prod- ucts. In addition, the solution benefits from com- plementary constraints brought by the various techniques. Figure 1. Organization of the coordinated project of the GRGS for multi-technique combination at the observation level. CLS (Collecte Localisation Satellite) is a private company funded in particular by the CNES. In this paper, we present an overview of the analyses undertaken with this new VLBI soft- ware, the results obtained for the EOP from 2005 to 2006, and the comparisons made with the IVS (International VLBI Service for geodesy and as- trometry) analysis coordinator combined results. These comparisons indicate that GINS is at the level of the other VLBI analysis software pack- ages. 2 VLBI analysis with GINS: data and modeling Since 2005 the regular weekly VLBI data ac- quired by the IVS have been routinely processed with the GINS software in order to estimate the EOP and the VLBI station positions. These data include both the IVS intensive sessions (i.e. one- hour long daily experiments) and the so-called IVS-R1 and IVS-R4 sessions (i.e. two 24-hour experiments per week). Overall, a total of 20 sta- tions have been used in such sessions. Based on these data, weekly normal matrices are produced for combination with the data ac- quired by the other space geodetic techniques (GPS, SLR, LLR and DORIS). The free VLBI parameters include station positions and the five EOP (Xp, Yp, U T 1 − U T C, dψ, dǫ) along with clock and troposphere parameters. The clocks are modeled using piecewise continuous linear functions with breaks every two hours. The tro- pospheric zenith delays are modeled in a similar way except that breaks are applied every hour. Continuity constraints of 10 µs and 10 cm are applied to the clock and troposphere breaks, re- spectively. The a priori EOP series used is the IERS C04 series, the a priori Terrestrial Ref- erence Frame (TRF) is VTRF2005 (Nothnagel, 2005), while the celestial frame is fixed to the ICRF (International Celestial Reference Frame; Ma et al., 1998; Fey et al., 2004). The following tidal and atmospheric models are also used in the analysis: ◦ IERS Conventions 2003 for solid Earth tides and pole tide models (McCarthy and Petit, 2003), ◦ FES2004 for oceanic tides and oceanic load- ing models (Lyard et al., 2006), ◦ 6h-ECMWF (European Center for Mete- 2 IVS-R1 IVS-R4 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 ) m c ( s e u l a V 0 2005 2006 Years 2007 Figure 2. Post-fit weighted RMS delay residuals with GINS for the IVS-R1 and IVS-R4 sessions con- ducted in 2005-2006. orological Weather Forecast) atmospheric pressure fields only over continents (inverse barometer hypothesis) for atmospheric load- ing model, ◦ Niell tropospheric mapping functions (Niell, 1996). 3 VLBI analysis with GINS: results and comparison section, we present In this the VLBI-only EOP results obtained based on a fixed TRF (VTRF2005) and compare these to the IVS com- bined EOP series. One set of EOP (Xp, Yp, U T 1 − U T C, dψ, dǫ) was estimated for every 24-hour session. (see RMS values in Table 1): ◦ 0.20 mas for the polar motion coordinates, ◦ 0.15 mas for the celestial pole offsets, and ◦ 10 µs for the Earth's angle of rotation. These differences may partly arise from us- ing different TRF in the two analyses: the IVS analysis coordinator used ITRF2000, whereas we fixed the TRF to VTRF2005. Another point to highlight is that these comparisons used non- weighted RMS to evaluate the differences be- tween the EOP series obtained with GINS and those published by the IVS analysis coordinator. Such values are generally larger that the more common "weighted RMS". 4 Conclusions and prospects GINS is a new VLBI analysis software in the IVS community. We showed that VLBI analyses un- dertaken with GINS lead to EOP results that agree at the level of 150–200 µas with respect to the IVS combined series results. This is com- parable to the other IVS analysis centers, which demonstrates the capability of the GINS software for VLBI-only analysis. Another strength of GINS is the possibility of analysing observations of five space geode- tic techniques (VLBI, GPS, LLR, SLR and DORIS) alltogether. Such a combination at the observation level is one of the goals of the IAG (International Association of Geodesy) project GGOS (Global Geodetic Observing Sys- tem; Rummel et al., 2005). In the future, further developments and inves- tigations are planned to refine such VLBI analy- sis with GINS: ◦ To improve the relative weighting of the ◦ To adjust tropospheric gradients, together with zenithal tropospheric delays. VLBI observations. Figure 2 shows the post-fit weighted RMS (Root Mean Square) delay residuals obtained with GINS for the IVS-R1 and IVS-R4 sessions in 2005–2006. The RMS average over this period is 1.08 cm (i.e. 36 ps) for the IVS-R1 sessions, and 0.97 cm (i.e. 32 ps) for the IVS-R4 sessions. the EOP series as de- Figure 3 shows of rived with GINS, the on the basis section. analysis described in the previous to The are plotted with respect the IVS combined series (ivs06q3e.eops; see http://vlbi.geod.uni-bonn.de/IVS-AC/combi-eops/QUAT/HTML/start q.html). Table 1 summarizes the statistics for these series, plus those with respect to the IERS C04 series. Our current VLBI-only EOP results agree with the IVS combined series at the following levels results ◦ To validate the underlying models in GINS by carrying out detailed comparisons with those implemented in the JPL (Jet Propul- sion Laboratory) VLBI software MODEST (Sovers and Jacobs, 1996). ◦ To submit to the IVS analysis coordinator the EOP results obtained with GINS for fur- ther evaluation. 3 Table 1. Mean and RMS differences for each of the five EOP series (Xp, Yp, U T 1 − U T C, dǫ, dψ sin ǫ) derived with GINS when compared to (1) the IERS C04 series, and (2) the IVS combined series. EOP wrt Xp µas Yp U T 1 − U T C µas µs Mean C04 -201 RMS IVS C04 IVS 47 216 212 343 -95 215 211 3.4 2.3 9.9 10.2 dǫ µas 49 36 150 145 dψ sin ǫ µas 7 -62 139 139 ◦ To adjust the radiosource coordinates to in- vestigate the source position variability and ultimately to produce a celestial reference frame with GINS. Acknowledgements G. Bourda is grateful to the CNES (Centre Na- tional d'Etudes Spatiales, France) for the post- doctoral position granted at Bordeaux Observa- tory. She wishes also to the Advisory Board of the Descartes-Nutations prize for supporting the journey to Vienna in order to present this work. References Biancale R., Balmino G., Lemoine J.-M., Marty J.- C., Moynot B., Barlier F., Exertier P., Laurain O., Gegout P., Schwintzer P., Reigber C., Bode A., Konig R., Massmann F.-H., Raimondo J.-C., Schmidt R. & Zhu S. Y., 2000, "A new global Earth's gravity field model from satellite orbit perturbations: GRIM5-S1", Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3611–3614 Coulot D., Berio P., Biancale R., Loyer S., Soudarin L. & Gontier A.-M., 2007, "Toward a direct combination of space-geodetic tech- niques at the measurement level: Methodol- ogy and main issues", J. Geophys. Res., 112, 10.1029/2006JB004336 Fey A.L., Ma C., Arias E.F., Charlot P., Feissel- Vernier M., Gontier A.-M., Jacobs C.S., Li J. & MacMillan D.S., 2004, "The Second Extension of the International Celestial Reference Frame: ICRF-EXT.1", AJ, 127, 3587–3608 Gambis D., Biancale R., Carlucci T., Lemoine J.- M., Marty J.-C., Bourda G., Charlot P., Loyer S., Lalanne T. & Soudarin L., 2007, "Combination of Earth Orientation Parameters and terrestrial frame at the observational level", IAG Springer Series (submitted) Lyard F., Lef`evre F., Letellier T. & Francis O., 2006, "Modelling the global ocean tides: a modern in- 4 sight from FES2004", Ocean Dynamics, 56, 394– 415 Ma C., Arias E.F., Eubanks T.M., Fey A.L., Gon- tier A.-M., Jacobs C.S., Sovers O.J., Archi- nal B.A. & Charlot P., 1998, "The International Celestial Reference Frame as Realized by Very Long Baseline Interferometry", AJ, 116, 516–546 McCarthy D.D. & Petit G., 2003, "IERS Conven- tions (2003)", IERS Technical Note 32, Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts fr Kartogra- phie und Geodsie, paperback, ISBN 3-89888-884- 3 (print version) Meyer U., Charlot P. & Biancale R., 2000, "GINS: A new Multi-Technique Software for VLBI Analy- sis", International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry 2000 General Meeting Proceedings, edited by Nancy R. Vandenberg and Karen D. Baver, NASA/CP-2000-209893 Niell A.E., 1996, "Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths", J. Geo- phys. Res., 101, 3227-3246, 10.1029/95JB03048 Nothnagel A., 2005, "VTRF2005 - A combined VLBI Terrestrial Reference Frame", Proceedings of the 17th Working Meeting on European VLBI for Geodesy and Astrometry, Noto, Italy Reigber Ch., Balmino G., Schwintzer P., Biancale R., Bode A., Lemoine J.-M., Koenig R., Loyer S., Neumayer H., Marty J.-C., Barthelmes F., Per- osanz F. & Zhu S.Y., 2002, "A high qual- ity global gravity field model from CHAMP GPS tracking data and Accelerometry (EIGEN- 1S)", Geophysical Research Letters, 29(14), 10.1029/2002GL015064 Rummel R., Rothacher M. & Beutler G., 2005, "In- tegrated Global Geodetic Observing System (IG- GOS) – science rationale", Journal of Geodynam- ics, 40(4–5), 357–362, 10.1016/j.jog.2005.06.003 Sovers O.J. & Jacobs C.S., 1996, "Observation Model and Parameter Partials for the JPL VLBI Param- eter Estimation Software MODEST ", JPL Publi- cation 83-39, Rev. 6, August 1996 Polar Motion Coordinates wrt IVS combined series Xp Yp 2006 Years 2007 Celestial Pole Offsets wrt IVS combined series dEps dPsi*sin(Eps) 2006 Years 2007 UT1-UTC wrt IVS combined series 1 0.5 0 -0.5 ) s a m ( s e u l a V -1 2005 1 0.5 0 -0.5 ) s a m ( s e u l a V -1 2005 ) s d n o c e s o r c i m ( s e u l a V 40 20 0 -20 -40 2005 2006 Years 2007 Figure 3. VLBI Earth Orientation Parameters (Xp, Yp, dǫ, dψ sin ǫ, U T 1 − U T C) estimated with GINS, compared to the IVS analysis coordinator combined series (ivs06q3e.eops) between 2005 and 2006. 5
astro-ph/0503699	1	0503	2005-03-31T14:16:40	The basic parameters of gamma-ray-loud blazars	[ "astro-ph" ]	We determined the basic parameters, such as the central black hole mass ($M$), the boosting factor (or Doppler factor) ($\delta$), the propagation angle ($\Phi$) and the distance along the axis to the site of $\gamma$-ray production ($d$) for 23 $\gamma$-ray-loud blazars using their available variability timescales. In this method, the absorption effect depends on the $\gamma$-ray energy, emission size and property of the accretion disk. Using the intrinsic $\gamma$-ray luminosity as a fraction $\lambda$ of the Eddington luminosity, $L^{in}_{\gamma}=\lambda L_{Ledd.}$ and the optical depth equal to unity, we can determine the upper limit of the central black hole masses. We found that the black hole masses range between $10^{7}M_{\odot}$ and $10^{9}M_{\odot}$ when $\lambda$ = 0.1 and 1.0 are adopted. Since this method is based on gamma-ray emissions and the short time-scale of the sources, it can also be used for central black hole mass determination of high redshift gamma-ray sources. In the case of the upper limit of black hole mass there is no clear difference between BLs and FSRQs, which suggests that the central black hole masses do not play an important role in the evolutionary sequence of blazars.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. jhfan (DOI: will be inserted by hand later) November 2, 2018 5 0 0 2 r a M 1 3 1 v 9 9 6 3 0 5 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars J.H. Fan 1. Center for Astrophysics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510400, China, e-mail: [email protected] 2. Chinese Academy of Science-Peking University Joint Beijing Astrophysical Center(CAS-PKU.BAC), Beijing, China 3. National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Received Oct 25, 2003/ Accepted Jan. 11, 2005 Abstract. We determined the basic parameters, such as the central black hole mass (M ), the boosting factor (or Doppler factor) (δ), the propagation angle (Φ) and the distance along the axis to the site of γ-ray production (d) for 23 γ-ray-loud blazars using their available variability timescales. In this method, the absorption effect depends on the γ-ray energy, emission size and property of the accretion disk. Using the intrinsic γ-ray luminosity as a fraction λ of the Eddington luminosity, Lin γ = λLLedd. and the optical depth equal to unity, we can determine the upper limit of the central black hole masses. We found that the black hole masses range between 107M⊙ and 109M⊙ when λ = 0.1 and 1.0 are adopted. Since this method is based on gamma-ray emissions and the short time-scale of the sources, it can also be used for central black hole mass determination of high redshift gamma-ray sources. In the case of the upper limit of black hole mass there is no clear difference between BLs and FSRQs, which suggests that the central black hole masses do not play an important role in the evolutionary sequence of blazars. Key words. Galaxies:quasars-galaxies:BL Lacertae objects-galaxies:jet- galaxies:γ-rayst 1. Introduction The EGRET instrument at CGRO has detected many blazars (i.e. flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) and BL Lacertae objects (BLs)). Blazars emit most of their bolo- metric luminosity in γ-rays (E > 100 MeV) (Hartman et al. 1999). Many γ-ray emitters are also superluminal radio sources (von Montigny et al. 1995). These objects share some common properties, such as luminous γ-ray emis- sion and strong variability in the γ-ray and other bands on timescales from hours to days (see below). These facts suggest that γ-ray emission in blazars is likely arise from a jet. To explain its observational properties, a beaming (black hole + accretion disk + jet) model has been pro- posed. In the beaming model, a supermassive black hole is surrounded by an accretion disk. Many authors have tried to estimate the masses using different methods, (1) the reverberation mapping technique (e.g. Wandel, Peterson & Malkan 1999; Kaspi et al. 2000), (2) the gas and stellar dynamics technique (see Genzel et al. 1997; Magorrian et al. 1998; Kormendy & Gebhardt 2001), (3) the variability time-scale technique (Fan et al. 1999; Cheng et al. 1999), (4) the broad-line width technique (Dibai 1984; Wandel & Yahil 1985; Padovani & Rafanelli 1988; Laor 1998; Mclure offprint Send [email protected] requests to: Dr. J.H. Fan, e-mail: & Dunlop 2001; Vestergaard 2000 based on the assump- tion that the clouds in the broad-line region (BLR) are gravitationally bound and orbiting with Keplerian veloci- ties). The central black hole mass is also found to be cor- related with bulge luminosities (Kormendy & Richstone 1995), the bulge mass (Magorrian et al. 1998), the bulge velocity dispersion (Ferrarese & Merritt 2000; Gebhardt et al. 2000; Ferrarese et al. 2001) and the radio power (Franceschini et al. 1998). However, Ho (2002) found that the radio continuum power either integrated for the whole galaxy or isolated for the core is poorly correlated with the central black hole mass. The tight MBH − σ correla- tion can be used for black hole mass determination. This relation is also used by Barth et al. (2002) and Wu et al. (2002) for black hole mass determination for Mrk 501 and other AGNs. Cao (2002) estimated the black hole mass for a sample of BL Lacertae objects based on the assump- tion that broad emission lines are emitted from clouds ionized by the radiation of the accretion disk surrounding the black hole. Since there is a large number of soft photons around the central black hole, it is generally believed that the escape of high energy γ-rays from the AGN depends on the γ − γ pair production process. Therefore, the opac- ity of γ − γ pair production in γ-ray-loud blazars can be used to constrain the basic parameters. Becker & Kafatos 2 J.H. Fan: The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars γ = ΩD2F obs γ γ (> 100M eV ), where F obs (1995) have calculated the γ-ray optical depth in the X- ray field of an accretion disk and found that the γ-rays should preferentially escape along the symmetry axis of the disk, due to the strong angular dependence of the pair production cross section. The phenomenon of γ − γ "focusing" is related to the more general issue of γ − γ transparency, which sets a minimum distance between the central black hole and the site of γ-ray production (Bednarek 1993, Dermer & Schlickeiser 1994, Becker & Kafatos 1995, Zhang & Cheng 1997). So, the γ-rays are focused in a solid angle, Ω = 2π(1−cosΦ), suggesting that the apparent observed luminosity should be expressed as Lobs and D are ob- served γ-ray energy flux and luminosity distance respec- tively. The observed γ-rays from an AGN require that the jet almost points towards us and that the optical depth τ is not greater than unity. The γ-rays are from a solid angle, Ω, instead of being isotropic. In this sense, the non- isotropic radiation, absorption and beaming (boosting) ef- fects should be considered when the properties of a γ-ray- loud blazars are discussed. In addition, the variability time scale may carry the information about the γ-ray emission region. These considerations require a new method to esti- mate the central black hole mass and other basic parame- ters of a γ-ray-loud blazar, which is the focus of the present paper. In section 2, we introduce the method used to es- timate the black hole mass and three other parameters (the Doppler factor, the propagation angle of the γ-rays and their emission distance at the symmetric axis above the accretion disk). In section 3, we present the discussion and a brief summary of the paper. H0 = 75 km s−1 Mpc−1, and q0 = 0.5 are adopted throughout the paper. 2. Mass estimation method and result 2.1. Method Here we describe our method of estimating the basic pa- rameters, namely, the central black hole mass (M ), the boosting factor (or Doppler factor) (δ), the propagation angle (Φ) and the distance along the axis to the site of the γ-ray production (d) for γ-ray-loud blazars with short timescale variabilities (see Cheng et al. 1999 for detail). To do so, we consider a two-temperature disk (See Fig. 1). The γ-ray observations suggest that the γ-rays are strongly boosted. From the high energy γ-ray emission we know that the optical depth of γ-γ pair production should not be larger than unity. In addition, the observed short-time scale gives some information about the size of emitting region. This can be used to constrain the basic parameters of a γ-ray-loud blazar as in the following. Optical depth Based on the paper by Becker & Kafatos (1995), we can obtain an approximate empirical formula for the optical depth for a two-temperature disk case at an arbitrary angle, Φ (see Cheng et al. 1999), Z Φ α A d O X−ray Θ γ−ray interaction point ρ η β R n X X−ray emitting disk R0 R ms Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of γ-ray propagation above a two-temperature disk surrounding a supermassive black hole. γ-rays interact with the soft X-ray photons produced at all points on the disk. The interaction angle between the γ-ray and X-ray photons is Θ, the angle between the γ-ray trajectory and the z-axis is Φ. η is the distance between the photon-photon interaction point and the soft photon emission point in the disk. where k is τγγ(M7, Φ, d) = 9×Φ2.5( d Rg )− 2αX +3 2 +kM −1 7 ( d Rg )−2αX−3 , (1) k = 4.61 × 109 Ψ(αX )(1+z)3+αX F ′ (2αX +1)(2αX +3) 0(1+z−√1+z)2 × ( R0 Rg [ )2αX +1−( Rms )−1−( R0 ( Rms Rg Rg Rg J.H. Fan: The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars 3 )2αX +1 )−1 ]( Eγ 4mec2 )αX , (2) Substituting Eqs. (6) and (5) into Eq. (1), we obtain a relation for τγγ(Φ, M, Liso), M7 is the black hole mass in units of 107M⊙, Ψ(αX ) a function of the X-ray spectral index, αX , F ′0 the X-ray flux parameter in units of cm−2 s−1, me the electron mass, c the speed of light, Rg = GM c2 Schwarzschild radius, Eγ the average energy of the γ-rays. The inner and outer radii of the hot region of a two-temperature accretion disk (Becker & Kafatos 1995) are R0 and Rms respectively. Eq. (1) shows that the optical depth depends on d, Φ and M . Time scale and the site of γ−ray production The time scale gives us information the emitting region (or the dis- tance along the axis to the site of γ-ray production), d = cδ∆TD 1+z . For convenience, we express d in the form of (∆TD in units of days). d Rg = 1.73 × 103 ∆TD 1 + z δM −1 7 (3) 1 Γ(1−βcosΦ) is the boosting factor, (Γ = (1 − where δ = β2)−1/2 is the bulk Lorentz factor and β is the bulk ve- locity in unit of the speed of light c. γ−Ray luminosity In a relativistic beaming model, the observed luminosity is correlated with the intrinsic one in the frame comoving with the relativistic jet by Lobs γ = δαγ +4 (1 + z)αγ−1 Lin γ where αγ is γ-ray spectral index. As mentioned above, the observed γ-ray flux, F obs (> 100M eV ), which is in units of ergs cm−2 s−1, can be expressed as a function of the intrinsic luminosity Lin γ , the Doppler factor δ, the lumi- nosity distance D, and the solid angle Ω (or propagation angle Φ) γ F obs γ (> 100MeV) = (1 + z)1−αγ δαγ +4Lin γ /ΩD2 τγγ(Φ, M7, Liso) = [9 × Φ2.5(1 − cosΦ)− 2αX +3 2αγ +8 + kM −1 7 A− 2αX +3 2 (1 − cosΦ)− 2αX +3 αγ +4 ]A− 2αX +3 2 . (7) From the high energy γ-ray emission, we know that the optical depth of γ-γ pair production should not be larger than unity. So, we can assume τγγ(Φ, M7, Liso) = 1.0 for our purposes. However, there are two variables in the equation of τγγ(Φ, M7, Liso) = 1.0, so one should have one more equation to determine the basic parameters. Fortunately, the τγγ(Φ, M, Liso) shows a minimum for a certain mass M7 and angle Φ. For a given mass, M7, the dependence of τγγ(Φ, M, Liso) on Φ is illustrated in Figure 2, in which we show the case of 0208-512. For the source, the relevant values are αX = 1.04, αγ = 0.69, k = 6.41, Liso = 2.0 × 1048ergss−1, z = 1.003, λ = 0.1, and ∆T = 134.4 hours respectively. In this sense, if we assume that the minimum value of τγγ(Φ, M, Liso) is equal to 1.0, then we will have the relation ∂τγγ ∂Φ M = 0. Equation (7) gives ∂τγγ ∂Φ M = [22.5Φ1.5(1 − cosΦ) − 9 × 2αX + 3 2αγ + 8 Φ2.5sinΦ − 2αX + 3 αγ + 4 kM −1 7 A− 2αX +3 2 (1 − cosΦ)− 2αX +3 2αγ +8 sinΦ]× ×[(1 − cosΦ)− 2αX +2αγ +11 2αγ +8 A− 2αX +3 2 ],(8) then, ∂τγγ ∂Φ M = 0 suggests that 22.5Φ1.5(1 − cosΦ) − 9 × − 2αX + 3 αγ + 4 kM −1 7 A− 2αX +3 2 (1 − cosΦ)− Φ2.5sinΦ 2αX + 3 2αγ + 8 2αX +3 2αγ +8 sinΦ = 0 (9) Under this consideration, we can finally get four rela- If we define an isotropic luminosity as Liso = 4π D2F obs 100M eV ), we have γ (> tions, λ2.52 δαγ +4 L45 iso = (1 − cosΦ)(1 + z)αγ−1 M7 , where Lin γ = λLEdd = λ1.26 × 1045M7 is adopted, λ is a parameter depending on specific γ-ray emission models, iso is the isotropic luminosity in units of 1045 ergs s−1. L45 (4) From equation (4), we can get the Doppler factor d Rg = 1.73 × 103 ∆TD 1 + z δM −1 7 λ2.52 δαγ +4 L45 iso = (1 − cosΦ)(1 + z)αγ−1 M7 )−2αX−3 = 1 2 + kM −1 7 ( 2αX +3 d Rg 9 × Φ2.5( d Rg )− 22.5Φ1.5(1 − cosΦ) − 9 × Φ2.5sinΦ 2αX + 3 2αγ + 8 2αX +3 2αγ +8 sinΦ = 0 (10) δ = ( L45 iso(1 − cosΦ)(1 + z)αγ−1 λ2.52M7 1 αγ +4 ) . (5) − 2αX + 3 αγ + 4 kM −1 7 A− 2αX +3 2 (1 − cosΦ)− Substituting Eqs. (5) into Eq. (3), we can get a relation for d(Φ, M, Liso), d(Φ, M, Liso) = ARg(1 − cosΦ) 1 αγ +4 . (6) where A = 1.73 × 103∆TD(1 + z)− 5 αγ +4 M − 7 αγ +5 αγ +4 ( L45 iso λ2.52 ) 1 αγ +4 in which, there are four basic parameters. So, for a source with available data in the X-ray and γ-ray bands, the masses of the central black holes, M7, the Doppler fac- tor, δ, the distance along the axis to the site of the γ-ray production, d, and the propagation angle with respect to the axis of the accretion disk, Φ, can be derived from Eq. (10), where Rms = 6Rg, R0 = 30Rg, and Eγ= 1GeV are adopted. 4 J.H. Fan: The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars ferent sources and/or different observational periods, we use the doubling timescale, ∆TD = (Fminimum/∆F )∆T , as the variability timescale, where ∆F = Fmaximum − Fminimum is the variation of the flux over the time ∆T . There are few simultaneous X-ray and γ-ray band obser- vations, so the data considered here are not simultane- ous. The γ-ray data by Hartman et al. (1999) are used to calculate the γ-ray luminosity. The X-ray data are taken from recent publications(See col. 5 in table 1). Except for the two sources 1226+023 (Courviosier et al. 1988) and 2230+114 (Pica et al. 1988), the doubling time is taken from Dondi & Ghisellini (1995). The intrinsic γ-ray luminosity is unknown, so we as- sume it to be close to the Eddington luminosity, say λLEdd.. In the present work, λ = 0.1 and 1.0 are adopted for the calculations. From the available X-ray and γ-ray data, we can estimate the central black hole mass, M7 (see Table 1) and three other parameters (Φ, δ, d, these values are not listed in Table 1). Since short-term time scales and γ-ray emissions are included in our considera- tion, only objects with those values can be involved in the present paper. However, at present, short term timescales are available only for 23 γ-ray loud blazars as listed in Table 1, in which Col. 1 gives the name, Col. 2 the red- shift, Col. 3 the identification where Q stands for a flat spectral radio quasar and B for a BL Lacertae object, Col. 4 the 1 KeV X-ray flux density in units of µ Jy, Col. 5 the reference for Col. 4, Col. 6 the X-ray spectral index αX (the averaged value of < αX >= 0.67 (Comastri et al. 1997) is adopted for FSRQs and αOX = 1.31 is used for αX for BLs if their X-ray spectral indices are unknown, as done by Ghisellini et al. (1998)), Col. 7 the reference for Col. 6, Col. 8 the flux F(>100MeV) in units of 10−6 photon cm−2 s−1, Col. 9 the γ-ray spectral index αγ = 1.0 is adopted for 0537-441 (see Fan et al. 1998); The data in col no. (7) and (8) are mainly from by Hartman et al. (1999) except for Mkn 501, which showed a flux of F (> 100MeV) = (0.32 ± 0.13) × 10−6 photons cm−2 s−1 with a photon index of 1.6±0.5 during a 1996 multiwave- length campaign (see Kataoka et al. 1999), Col. 10 the doubling time scale in units of hours, Col. 11 reference for Col. 10, Col. 12 the observed isotropic luminosity in units of 1048erg s−1, Col. 13, the central black hole mass in units of 107M⊙ (λ = 1), Co1. 14, the central black hole mass in units of 107M⊙ (λ = 0.1). The references in Table 1 ( B97: Bloom et al. 1997; C97: Comastri et al. 1997; Ch99: Chiappetti et al. 1999; DG: Dondi & Ghisellini 1995; F98: Fan et al. 1998; Fo98: Fossati et al. 1998; H96: Hartman 1996; H96b: Hartman et al. 1996; H: Hartman et al. 1999; K93: Kniffen et al. 1993; L98: Lawson & McHardy 1998; M93: Mattox et al. 1993; M96: Madejski et al. 1996; M97: Mattox et al. 1997; P96: Perlman et al. 1996; P88: Pica et al. 1988; Q96: Quinn et al. 1996; S96: Stacy et al. 1996; U97: Urry et al. 1997; W98: Wehrle et al. 1998) Fig. 2. Plot of the optical depth against the angle Φ. For illustration, we used the data of 0208-512, the solid curve stands for the M7 = 95 case, while the dash-dotted curve for M7 = 60 and the dashed curve for M7 = 130. Here the relevant values are αX = 1.04, αγ = 0.69, k = 6.41, Liso = 2.0 × 1048ergss−1, z = 1.003, λ = 0.1, and ∆T = 134.4 hours respectively. 2.2. Results Since we are interested in the variability timescale, we present here only the γ-ray-loud blazars with detected short time scale variability. Since the variability timescale corresponds to the different amplitude of variation for dif- J.H. Fan: The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars 5 3. Discussion The central black hole plays an important role in the ob- servational properties of AGNs and has drawn much atten- tion. It may also shed some light on the evolution (Wang et al. 2001; Barth et al. 2002; Cao 2002). There are sev- eral methods for black hole mass determinations although consensus has not been reached. In the present work, we proposed a new method to estimate the central black hole mass. It is constrained by the optical depth of the γ − γ pair production and can be used if X-ray and γ-ray emis- sions and short time-scale are known. This method can be used to determine the central black hole mass of high redshift gamma-ray sources. It is an approximate empir- ical method, which is obtained from the data/figures of Becker & Kafatos (1995). The mass determined in the present paper corresponds to an optical depth of unity and therefore the results correspond to the upper limit of the central black hole mass. The main difference between our consideration and others is that we assumed that the γ-rays originate from a cone while others think that the γ- rays are isotropic. However, our results are consistent with those obtained by others as discussed in the following. In our consideration, the estimated mass upper limits for a sample presented here are in the range of 107M⊙ to 109M⊙, (0.57 ∼ 60) × 107M⊙ for λ = 1.0 and (0.87 ∼ 95.0) × 107M⊙ for λ = 0.1. The real value of λ will cause an uncertainty in the mass, but the uncertainty caused by λ will be negligible. When λ decreases by a factor of 10, the mass increases by a factor of ∼ 1.5. The results obtained with the present method are independent of the γ-ray emission mechanism although it will depend the X- ray emission mechanism. For illustration, we will compare the mass estimation for two sources, 3C 279 and Mkn 501. Several groups of authors have estimated their masses. 3C 279 This quasar displayed two outbursts, one in 1991 and another in 1996. The upper limit of the central black hole masses obtained from these outbursts are sim- ilar. For λ = 1.0 the masses were M = 6.57 × 107M⊙ and M = 5.25 × 107M⊙ whereas for λ = 0.1, M = 10.2 × 107M⊙ and M = 8.12 × 107M⊙ for the 1991 and 1996 outbursts respectively. To fit the 3C 279 multiwave- length energy spectrum corresponding to the 1991 γ-ray flare, Hartman et al. (1996) used an accreting black hole of 108M⊙; our result of (6.57−10.2)×107M⊙ is consistent with their. Mkn 501 TeV and X-ray emission result shows that there is a possible period od 23 days in the light curves of Mkn 501 (Hayashida et al. 1998; Kranich et al. 1999), which may suggest binary black holes at center (Rieger & Mannheim 2000, 2003; Villata & Raiteri 1999). The black hole mass has been determined by many authors (0.2 − 3.4) × 109M⊙ (Barth et al. 2002; Kormendy & Gehbardt 2001; Merritt & Ferrarese 2001; Rieger & Mannheim 2003). Our present result shows that the central black hole mass upper limit is (4.01 ∼ 6.27) × 107M⊙. This re- sult is lower than those claimed by the authors mentioned above, but this difference is probably from the facts that (1) the methods used to estimate the mass by different authors are based on different assumptions, (2) there is a binary black hole system at the center of the BL Lacertae objects, our result corresponds to the less massive black hole. A binary black hole system is successfully used in the explanation of the periodic variability of the BL Lacertae object OJ 287 by Sillanpaa et al. (1988), who claimed that the ratio of the secondary black hole mass to the primary black hole mass is 0.004. Recently, Komossa et al. (2003) reported that there is a binary black hole system in NGC 6240. If there is a binary black hole system at the center of Mkn 501, and the more massive black hole of ∼ 109M⊙ corresponds to the primary black hole and the less mas- sive black hole of 107M⊙ corresponds to the secondary, then the ratio is 0.01, which is consistent with the result for OJ 287 by Sillanpaa et al. (1988). In addition, our result is consistent with that of De Jager et al. (1999), (1 − 6) × 107M⊙. BLs and FSRQs are two subclasses of blazars. From the observational point of view, except for the emis- sion line properties (the emission line strength in FSRQs is strong while that in BL is weak or invisible), other observational properties are very similar between them (Fan 2002). Their relationship has drawn much atten- tion (e.g. Sambruna et al. 1996; Scarpa & Falomo, 1997; Ghisellini et al. 1998; D'Elia & Cavaliere 2000; Bottcher & Dermer 2002; Fan 2002; Ciaramella et al. 2004). Bottcher & Dermer (2002) proposed that the accretion rate rather than the central black hole masses play an important role in the evolutionary sequence (from FSRQs evolving to BLs) of blazars. The accretion rate in FSRQs is much larger than in BLs, there is not much gas in BLs to fuel the central black hole. In the present paper, if we consider BLs and FSRQs separately, the distribution of the mass upper limits is not very show much different (see Fig. 3), their average masses are logM = 8.06 ± 0.54 for FSRQs, and logM = 8.13 ± 0.46 for BLs. There is no difference in black hole mass between BLs and FSRQs. Recently, Wu et al. (2002) also found that there is no mass difference be- tween different subclasses of AGNs. This result suggests that the central black hole mass play a less important role in the evolutionary sequence as pointed out by Bottcher & Dermer (2002). To investigate the evolutionary process further, one should take into account the black-hole spin and the accretion processes since the former effect is im- portant for non-thermal radio emission while the latter will change the properties of the outflow. The high luminosity, rapid variability and superlumi- nal motion observed in some γ-ray-loud blazars suggest that the γ-ray emission is strongly beamed, therefore, one can assume that the beamed emissions arise from a cer- tain solid angle. In the present paper, our calculation show that the propagation angle Φ and Doppler factor δ are in the range of 9.◦68 to 61.◦14 and 0.12 to 3.31 for λ = 1.0. For λ = 0.1 the value of Φ ranges from 8.◦91 to 56.◦49 and δ 0.16 to 4.6. In the isotropic emission case, the γ-rays can be detected at any angle, but in the case of non-isotropic 6 J.H. Fan: The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars Table 1. Black hole mass for 23 γ-ray-loud blazars N ame (1) 0208-512 0219+428 0235+164 0420-014 0458-020 0521-365 0528+134 0537-441 0716+714 0735+178 0829+046 0836+710 1101+384 1226+023 1253-055 1253-055 1510-089 1622-297 1633+382 1652+399 2155-304 2200+420 2230+114 2251+158 z (2) 1.003 0.444 0.94 0.915 2.286 0.055 2.07 0.894 0.3 0.424 0.18 2.17 0.031 0.158 0.537 0.538 0.361 0.815 1.814 0.033 0.117 0.07 1.04 0.859 ID f1KeV (4) (3) Q B B Q Q B Q B B B B Q B Q Q Q Q Q Q B B B Q Q 0.61 1.56 2.5 1.08 0.1 1.78 0.65 0.81 1.35 0.248 1.07 0.819 37.33 12.07 2.43 2.0 0.718 0.08 0.42 10.1 0.058 1.84 0.486 1.08 Ref (5) C97 Fo98 M96 Fo98 DG DG C97 C97 Fo98 Fo98 DG Fo98 Fo98 Fo98 H96b L98 Fo98 M97 C97 C97 U97 P96 Fo98 Fo98 αX (6) Ref (7) C97 1.04 1.6 Fo98 1.01 M96 0.67 C97 C97 0.67 DG 0.68 C97 0.54 1.16 C97 Fo98 1.77 Fo98 1.34 C97 0.67 Fo98 0.42 2.10 Fo98 0.81 Fo98 0.68 H96b L98 0.78 0.90 Fo98 C97 0.67 C97 0.53 C97 1.60 U97 1.25 1.31 P96 C97 0.67 0.62 Fo98 F (8) 9.1 0.25 0.65 0.64 0.68 0.32 3.08 2.0 0.46 0.30 0.34 0.33 0.27 0.09 2.8 11. 0.49 17. 0.96 0.32 0.34 1.71 0.51 1.16 αγ (9) 0.69 1.01 1.85 1.44 1.45 1.63 1.21 1.0 1.19 1.6 1.47 1.62 0.57 1.58 1.02 0.97 1.47 0.87 0.86 0.68 0.56 0.68 1.45 1.21 ∆TD (10) Ref (11) 134.4 30.0 72 33.6 144.0 72 24. 16. 1.92 28.8 24. 24. 1.92 24 12. 6. S96 DG M96 DG DG DG DG H96 DG DG DG DG DG C88 K93 W98 DG 57.6 4.85 M97 M93 16. Q96 6. Ch99 3.3 3.2 B97 P88 48 1.92 DG L48 iso (12) 2.0 0.018 2.0 0.175 1.424 0.0002 18.4 3.01 0.013 0.013 0.003 0.548 0.0001 0.003 1.34 5.75 0.018 26.9 9.72 0.0003 0.003 0.019 0.184 0.32 M1 M0.1 (14) (13) 60.9 19.73 36.75 10.98 31.48 31.1 4.52 10.46 2.22 20.03 12.14 1.67 1.5 8.9 6.57 5.25 28.03 5.44 3.43 4.01 3.26 11.0 15.33 0.57 95.0 29.80 53.69 16.43 47.2 46.44 6.97 15.96 3.28 29.37 18.2 2.53 2.31 13.27 10.2 8.12 41.9 8.51 5.42 6.27 5.11 15.95 22.95 0.87 1 emission, the emission is produced in the cone of a solid angle of Ω, then γ-rays will not be detected at any angle. From the observational properties such as high luminosity, rapid γ-ray variability and superluminal motion, boosting effects should be present in the γ-ray sources. So, the op- tical depth should depend on the angle Φ, the boosting factor δ, the central black hole masses and the distance along the axis to the site of γ-ray production, d, which αγ +4 . can be expressed as d(Φ, M, Liso) = ARg(1 − cosΦ) If the angle Φ is too small, then d is small, therefore, the site of the γ-ray production is near the center where the X-ray photon density will be high. So, the optical depth is large. In this sense, the smaller the angle Φ, the smaller the d, and the higher the X-ray photon density, which results in a higher optical depth. On the other hand, when the angle Φ is too large, the boosting factor δ is very small, so that the optical depth is also large. Therefore, there are angles that correspond to a small optical depth. From Fig. 2, one can see that the minimum value depends on the central black hole mass, so one can choose a mass so that the minimum value of the optical depth is 1.0. The mass estimated in this way is an upper limit. From our calcu- lation, we found that Dopper factor δ < 1 in some cases; the lower than unity Doppler factors do not conflict with the beaming argument since we proposed that the emis- sion is not isotropic in the present work. Other authors assumed that the emission is isotropic. The different as- sumptions will result in a ( 1−cosΦ 4+α times difference in the Doppler factor. For the γ-ray emission regions, the ob- ) 1 2 tained results indicate that they are in the range of 17.2Rg to 713Rg (λ = 1.0) or 18.8Rg to 640Rg (λ = 0.1). In this paper, the optical depth of a γ-ray travelling in the field of a two-temperature disk and beaming effects have been used to determine the central mass, M , for 23 γ-ray-loud blazars with available short time-scales. The masses obtained in the present paper are in the range of 107M⊙ to 109M⊙ for the whole sample. In the case of black hole mass, there is no clear difference between BLs and FSRQs, which suggests that the central black hole masses do not play an important role in the evolutionary sequence of blazars. Acknowledgements. This work is partially supported by the National 973 project (NKBRSF G19990754), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (10125313), and the Fund for Top Scholars of Guangdong Province (Q 02114). I thank the anonymous referee for the constructive suggestions and comments, Prof Jiansheng Chen and Prof. Youyuan Zhou for suggestions, Dr. Alok C. Gupta for review- ing the language for me, Dr. Hongguang Wang for useful dis- cussion. I also thank the Guangzhou City Education Bureau, which supports our research in astrophysics and the Chinese Academy of Sciences for the support for advanced visiting scholars. References Barth, A.J., Ho, L.C., Sargent, W.L.W., 2002, ApJL, 566, L13 Becker P., Kafatos, M. 1995, ApJ, 453, 83 Bednarek W. 1993, A&A, 278, 307 J.H. Fan: The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars 7 Courvoisier, T. J.-L.; Robson, E. I., Hughes, D. H., Blecha, A., Bouchet, P., et al. 1988, Nat, 335,683 Kranich, D., De Jager, O.C., Kestel, M., et al. 1999, Proc. of 26th ICRC(Slat Lake City), Vol. 3, p346 Dermer C.D., Schlickeiser R., Mastichiadis A. 1992, A&A 256,L27 D'Elia, V., & Cavaliere, A., 2000, PASP, 227, 252 Dibai, E. A., 1984, SvA, 28, 245 Dondi, L., Ghisellini, G., 1995, MNRAS, 273, 583 Fan J.H. 2002, PASJ, 54, L15 Fan J.H., Xie G.Z., Bacon, R. 1999, A&AS, 136, 13 Fan J.H., Adam G., Xie G.Z. et al. 1998, A&A 338, 27 Ferrarese, L. & Merritt, D. 2000, ApJ, 539L, L9 Ferrarese, L., Pogge, R. W., Peterson, B. M., et al. 2001, ApJL, 555, L79 Fossati, G., Maraschi, L., Celotti, A., Comastri, A., Ghisellini, G. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 433 Franceschini, A., Vercellone, S., & Fabian, A.C., 1998, MNRAS, 297, 817 Gebhardt, K.,Kormendy, J., Ho, L. C., et al. 2000, ApJL, 543, L5 Genzel, R., Eckart, A., Ott, T., Eisenhauer, F., 1997, MNRAS, 291, 219 Ghisellini G., Celotti A., Fossati G., et al. 1998, MNRAS 301, 451 Hartman, R.C., Bertsch, D. L., Chen, A. W., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 79 Hartman, R.C., Webb J.R., Marscher A.P. et al. 1996, ApJ, 461, 698. Hartman, R. C., 1996, ASP Conf. Ser. 110, p33 Hayashida, N., Hirasawa, H., Ishikawa, F., et al. 1998, ApJ, 504L, L71 Ho, L.C., 2002, ApJ, 564, 120 Kaspi, S., Smith, P. S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B. T., Giveon, U., 2000, ApJ, 533, 631 Kataoka, J., Mattox, J. R., Quinn, J., et al. 1999, APh, 11, 149 Kniffen D.A., Bertsch D.L., Fichtel C.E. et al. 1993, ApJ 411, 133 Komossa, S., Burwitz, V., Hasinger, G., et al. 2003, ApJL, 582, L15 Kormendy, J., & Richstone, D., 1995, ARA&A, 33, 581 Kormendy, J., & Gehbardt, K., 2001, Proceedings of the 20th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, eds. H. Martel & J.C. Wheeler. Kranich, D., Mirzoyan, R., Petry, D., et al. 1999, APh, 12, 65 Laor, A., 1998, ApJ, 505L, 83 Lawson, A. J. & McHardy, I. M., 1998, MNRAS, 300, 1023 Madejski, G., Takahashi, T., Tashiro, M., et al. 1996, ApJ, 459, 156 Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285 Mattox J.R., Bertsch D.L., Chiang J. et al. 1993, ApJ 410, 609. Mattox J.R., Wagner S.J., Malkan M., et al. 1997, ApJ 476, 692 Fig. 3. Histogram of black hole mass for BLs(dotted lines) and FSRQs (solid lines) for the case of λ = 0.1. Bloom S.D., Bertsch D.L., Hartman R.C. et al. 1997, ApJ 490, L145 Bottcher, M., & Dermer, C.D., 2002, ApJ, 564, 86 Cao, X.W. 2002, ApJL, 570, L13 Cheng K.S., Fan, J.H., Zhang, L., 1999, A&A, 352, 32 Chiappetti, L., Maraschi, L., Tavechio, F., et al. 1999, ApJ, 521, 552 Ciaramella, A., Bongardo, C., Aller, H. D., et al. 2004, A&A, McLure, R. J. & Dunlop, J. S., 2001, MNRAS, 327, 199 Merritt, D., & Ferrarese, L., 2001, in: The Central Kiloparsec of Starbursts and AGNs, eds. J.H. Knapen, J.E. Beckman et al., ASP Conf. Proc. 249, p335. Padovani, P. & Rafanelli, P., 1988, A&A, 205, 53 Perlman E.S., Stocke, J. T., Schachter, J. F., et al. 1996, ApJS 419, 485 104, 251 Comastri, A., Fossati, F., Ghisellini, G., et al. 1997, ApJ, 480, 534 Pica A.J., Smith, A. G., Webb, J. R., et al. 1988, AJ, 96, 1215 Quinn, J., Akerlof, C.W., Biller, S. et al. 1996, ApJ, 456, L83 8 J.H. Fan: The basic parameters of γ-ray-loud blazars Rieger, F. M. & Mannheim, K., 2000, A&A, 359, 948 Rieger, F. M. & Mannheim, K., 2003, A&A, 397, 121 Sambruna, R. M., Maraschi, L., Urry, C. M., 1996, ApJ, 463, 444 Scarpa, R., Falomo, R., 1997, A&A, 325, 109 Sillanpaa, A., Haarala, S., Valtonen, M. J., wt al. 1988, ApJ, 325, 628 Stacy J.C., Vestrand W.T., Sreekumar P. et al. 1996, A&AS 120, 549 Urry C.M., Treves, A., Maraschi, L., et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, 799 Vestergaard, M., 2002, ApJ, 571, 733 Villata, M., Raiteri, C. M., 1999, A&A, 347, 30 von Montigny C., Bertsch D.L., Chiang J. et al. 1995, ApJ 440, 525 Wandel, A. & Yahil, A., 1985, ApJ, 295L, 1 Wandel, A., Peterson, B.M., & Malkan, M.A., 1999, ApJ, 526, 579 Wang, J.M., Xue, S.J., Wang, J.C., 2001, ApJ(submitted), (astro-ph/0111209) Wehrle A.E., Pian E., Urry C.M. et al. 1998, ApJ 497, 178 Wu, X.B., Liu, F.K., Zhang, T.Z., 2002, A&A, 389, 742 Zhang L., Cheng K.S. 1997, ApJ 475, 534 4 3 2 1 u a T M=130 M=95 M =60 0 0 5 10 Phi 15 6 N 4 2 0 6 7 8 Log M 9
0711.3212	2	0711	2007-11-29T02:51:49	Limits on Hot Galactic Halo Gas from X-ray Absorption Lines	[ "astro-ph" ]	Although the existence of large-scale hot gaseous halos around massive disk galaxies have been theorized for a long time, there is yet very little observational evidence. We report the Chandra and XMM-Newton grating spectral detection of OVII and NeIX Kalpha absorption lines along the sight-line of 4U 1957+11. The line absorption is consistent with the interstellar medium in origin. Attributing these line absorptions to the hot gas associated with the Galactic disk, we search for the gaseous halo around the Milky Way by comparing this sight-line with more distant ones (toward X-ray binary LMC X-3 and the AGN Mrk 421). We find that all the line absorptions along the LMC X-3 and Mrk 421 sight-lines are attributable to the hot gas in a thick Galactic disk, as traced by the absorption lines in the spectra of 4U~1957+11 after a Galactic latitude dependent correction. We constrain the OVII column density through the halo to be N(OVII) < 5E15 cm^{-2} (95% confidence limit), and conclude that the hot gas contribution to the metal line absorptions, if existing, is negligible.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Accepted for publication in the ApJ Letters Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 LIMITS ON HOT GALACTIC HALO GAS FROM X-RAY ABSORPTION LINES Y. YAO1, M. A. NOWAK1, Q. D. WANG2, N. S. SCHULZ1, AND C. R. CANIZARES1 Accepted for publication in the ApJ Letters ABSTRACT Although the existence of large-scale hot gaseous halos around massive disk galaxies have been theorized for a long time, there is yet very little observational evidence. We report the Chandra and XMM-Newton grating spectral detection of O VII and Ne IX Kα absorption lines along the sight-line of 4U 1957+11. The line absorption is consistent with the interstellar medium in origin. Attributing these line absorptions to the hot gas associated with the Galactic disk, we search for the gaseous halo around the Milky Way by comparing this sight-line with more distant ones (toward LMC X -- 3 and the AGN Mrk 421). We find that all the line absorptions along the LMC X-3 and Mrk 421 sight-lines are attributable to the hot gas in a thick Galactic disk, as traced by the absorption lines in the spectra of 4U 1957+11 after a Galactic latitude dependent correction. We constrain the O VII column density through the halo to be NOVII < 5 × 1015 cm- 2 (95% confidence limit), and conclude that the hot gas contribution to the metal line absorptions, if existing, is negligible. Subject headings: Galaxy: halo -- Galaxy: structure -- X-rays: individual (4U 1957+11, Mrk 421, LMC X -- 3) 1. INTRODUCTION Many semi-analytic calculations and numerical simulations for disk galaxy formation predict the existence of extended hot gaseous halos around massive spirals due to the accretion of the intergalactic medium. For the Milky Way, the gas tem- perature can be shock-heated to ∼ 106 K at the virial radius (∼ 250 kpc; e.g., Birnboim & Dekel 2003; Fukugita & Pee- bles 2006), and the total mass contained in the large scale halo can be comparable with or even greater than the total baryonic mass of stars and the interstellar medium in the Galactic disk (e.g., Sommer-Larsen 2006). Clearly, an observational mea- surement of such an extended halo will provide an important test of galaxy formation theories. Searching for X-ray emission from large scale halos around nearby disk galaxies has proven unsuccessful. Extraplanar X- ray emissions have indeed been routinely detected around a number of nearby spirals, but only on scales of several kpc (except for the star burst galaxies), and most likely as the result from on-going stellar feedback in galactic disks (e.g., Tüllmann et al. 2006; Li et al. 2006). The X-ray surface brightness of a galactic halo must be very weak at large scales, at least partly because of the density square dependence of the emission and the possible low metallicity of the gas. So far, the only claimed detection of an apparent X-ray-emitting halo on a scale of ∼ 20 kpc is around the quiescent edge-on disk galaxy NGC 5746 (Pedersen et al. 2006). The large-scale hot gaseous halo around the Milky Way is indirectly evidenced by the presence of high velocity clouds (HVCs), in particular, the detection of their associated O VI line absorption (e.g., Spitzer 1956; Sembach et al. 2003). Be- cause the O VI-bearing gas is preferentially populated at in- termediate temperatures of ∼ 3 × 105 K where thermally un- stable cooling occurs, it is believed to be produced at the in- terfaces between the cold/warm and the hot media. Without knowing the temperature distribution and the metallicity of the hot gas, however, it is very hard to reliably estimate its 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Kavli Institute for Astro- physics and Space Research, 70 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139; yaoys, mnowak, nss, and [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003; [email protected] total mass. The best way to directly measure the hot medium is through its X-ray absorption line features. Indeed, O VII, O VIII, and/or Ne IX absorption lines consistent with zero velocity shifts (cz ∼ 0) have been detected unambiguously toward sev- eral bright extragalactic sources (e.g., LMC X -- 3, Mrk 421, and PKS 2155-304; Nicastro et al. 2002; Fang et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2005; Yao & Wang 2007a, YW07a hereafter). But these sight-lines pass through the Galactic disk, the ex- tended Galactic halo, and (for those AGNs) the possible warm hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) in the Local Group. Re- cently, it has been argued that the bulk of these absorp- tions can not be produced in the WHIM (Fang et al. 2006; Yao & Wang 2007a; Bregman & Lloyd-Davies 2007). In- deed, these highly ionized absorption lines have also been de- tected in spectra of many Galactic sources (e.g., Yao & Wang 2005; Juett et al. 2006), clearly indicating the existence of the hot gas in the Galactic disk. All existing X-ray absorption and emission data are consistent with the hot gas located in the Galactic disk with a vertical exponential scale height of ∼ 2 kpc (Yao & Wang 2005, 2007a), comparable to those in- ferred from the angular distributions of column densities of the O VI-bearing gas and pulsar dispersion measures (Savage et al. 2003; Berkhuijsen et al. 2006). Clearly, the constraint on the location of the hot gas depends on the modeling. For instance, Bregman & Lloyd-Davies (2007) found that the ab- sorbing gas toward AGNs are also consistent with a uniformly spherical distribution within a radius of 20 kpc. The questions here are, whether the extended Galactic halo (defined as the hot gas in the region of >10 kpc beyond the Galactic plane but within the Galactic virial radius) exists, and how much does it contribute to the observed highly ionized X-ray absorptions? In this Letter, we present a differential study searching for such a large-scale hot gaseous halo around our Galaxy by comparing observations between sight-lines of 4U 1957+11 and Mrk 421, and between those of LMC X -- 3 and Mrk 421. Ne IX, O VII, and/or O VIII absorption lines at cz ∼ 0 have been detected in spectra of all three sources observed with Chandra and/or XMM-Newton X-ray Observatories. These compar- isons enable us to probe the Galactic halo by examining its contribution to the observed absorption lines, and then to es- 2 Yao et al. timate its total mass and/or its metallicity. Throughout the Letter, we adopt the solar abundances from Wilms et al. (2000), quote statistical errors (or upper limits) for single floating parameters at 90% (95%) confidence lev- els, and assume that the hot gas in both the Galactic disk and halo is in the collisional ionization equilibrium state and is ap- proximately isothermal. We further assume that the disk gas is distributed following an exponential decay law with a ver- tical scale height of 2 kpc (e.g., Savage, et al. 2003; YW07a). All the data analyses are performed with the software package XSPEC (version 11.3.2). 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION 4U 1957+11 (V1408 Aquilae; l,b = 51.◦31,- 9.◦33) is a per- sistent low mass X-ray binary (Nowak & Wilms 1999 and references therein). Chandra observed this source for 67 ks on 2004 September 7 (ObsID 4552) with the High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS; Canizares et al. 2005) and XMM-Newton observed it for 45 ks on 2004 October 16 (ObsID 206320101). We reprocessed both Chandra and XMM-Newton obser- vations following the standard procedures. Using the soft- ware package CIAO 3 and calibration database (CALDB) ver- sion 3.4, we re-calibrated the Chandra observation, extracted grating spectra, and calculated corresponding instrumental re- sponse files (RSPs). In this study, we only use the first or- der spectra from the medium energy grating because of its large effective area at longer wavelengths (> 13 Å). To fur- ther enhance the counting statistics, we co-added the positive- and the negative-grating spectra and RSPs. For the XMM- Newtonobservation, we used the software package SAS(ver- sion 6.50) 4 to remove those events contaminated with back- ground flares (by screening out the time intervals with an event count rate > 0.4 counts/s on the CCD9), and then ex- tracted spectra and calculated RSPs from the Reflection Grat- ing Spectrometer (RGS) events by running the thread rgsproc. Because of the failure of the CCD4 in the RGS2, we only use the RGS1 spectrum. In order to measure absorption line properties we only rely on the nearby continuum levels. We therefore use several parts of the spectra that are local to the lines of our inter- est. For the Chandra spectrum, we use a wavelength range of 12.0 -- 22.5 Å covering the Kα and/or Kβ transition lines of O VII, O VIII Ne VIII, Ne IX, and Ne X. For the case of the XMM- Newtonspectrum, the RGS1 has no effective area around the Ne IX Kα line and there is a bad pixel near the O VIII Kα line at 18.969 Å. Here we use ranges of 18.0 -- 18.9 and 19.2 -- 22.5 Å covering the O VII Kα and Kβ lines. Mrk 421, a bright quasar at z = 0.03 (l,b = 179.◦83,65.◦03), is a Chandra calibration target and has been observed with the high resolution grating instruments multiple times; most of the observations have been reported in YW07. In this Let- ter, we use the same observations, and the same spectra and RSPs as in YW07. To fit the spectra without worrying about overlapping spectral orders, for each of the observations taken with High Resolution Camera (HRC; Table 1 in YW07), we derive the first order spectrum with minimal higher (> 1) or- der confusion via the following steps. We first fit the broad- band (1.5-35 Å) order-overlapped spectrum with the order combined RSP, and then multiply the spectral counts chan- 3 http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/ 4 http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/sas/current/documentation/threads nel by channel with the ratio between the model predicated counts based on the first order RSP and that based on the order-combined RSP. We then combine all the first order spec- tra of different observations using the same procedure as in YW07. In YW07, we have reported the O VII Kα, Kβ, and O VIII Kα absorption lines in the spectrum of Mrk 421 and measured their equivalent widths (EWs; see also Williams et al. 2005; Kaastra et al. 2006). In fact, the Ne IX Kα line has also been detected in the spectrum (Williams et al. 2005). However, we find that, due to an instrumental feature near the line, measur- ing the amount of the Ne IX absorption is severely affected by how the continuum is placed. To avoid such an uncertainty, in our analysis we only use the spectral range of 18 -- 22.5 Å, covering the oxygen lines as mentioned above. LMC X -- 3 (l,b = 273.◦58,- 32.◦08) is located ∼ 50 kpc away from the Sun and Chandra observed it with the Low Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer plus HRC for ∼ 100 ks in total. The interstellar O VII and Ne IX Kα absorption lines observed in this sight-line have been reported by Wang et al. (2005). In this Letter, we use the same spectra and RSPs as in Wang et al. . Following the same procedure as for Mrk 421 spectra (see above), we obtained the co-added first order spec- trum and the RSP. We use the spectral range of 12.0 -- 22.5 Å in the following analysis. 3. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS We focus our efforts on searching for and analyzing the highly ionized absorption lines at cz ∼ 0 that are likely pro- duced in the hot ISM (§ 4). The Ne IX (13.447 Å) and O VII Kα (21.602 Å) lines consistent with cz ∼ 0 appear in the Chandra and XMM-Newton spectra at ∼ 3 and 4σ significance levels (Fig. 1), respectively. Modeling these two lines with nega- tive Gaussian models, we measure their EWs as 6.3(3.9, 8.8) and 18.7(8.3, 30.6) mÅ. Note that the EWs measured here are for reference only. The ionic column density and the disper- sion velocity of the absorbing gas will be measured in below. No other highly ionized O and Ne lines are detected at > ∼2σ significance. Fixing the line centroid at the rest frame wave- length (Verner et al. 1996; Behar & Netzer 2002), we obtain the EW upper limits of Ne X(12.134 Å), Ne VIII (13.646 Å) and O VIII Kα (18.969 Å), and O VII Kβ (18.629 Å) lines as 1.2, 2.8, 15.6, 10.1 mÅ, respectively. Since all these line are un- resolved, we fix the line width σ to 100 km s- 1 (please refer to vb in Table 1) during these measurements and we use ei- ther the Chandra or XMM-Newton spectrum, whichever has higher counting statistics near the line (Fig. 1). A comparison of the line absorption between 4U 1957+11 and Mrk 421 sight-lines provides an effective probe of the large scale Galactic hot gaseous halo. The distance of 4U 1957+11 is estimated to be D ∼ 10 - 25 kpc (M. Nowak et al. in preparation), a location of 1.6 -- 4.1 kpc below the Galactic disk plane where it samples 55-87% of the Galactic disk gas in the vertical direction (§ 1) along the line of sight. In comparison, the line of sight towards Mrk 421 samples the hot gas not only in the Galactic disk but also in the putative Galactic halo (§ 1). Therefore the differential absorptions be- tween these two sight-lines allow us to directly constrain the absorption contribution from the halo. We first characterize the hot absorbing gas towards these two sight-lines by using our absorption line model, absline. This model adopts the the Voigt function to approximate an individual line profile, and uses the line centroid El, veloc- Limits on Hot Galactic Halo Gas 3 FIG. 1. -- The oxygen and neon absorption lines detected in the spectra of 4U 1957+11. The upper plots in panels (b) and (c) are from the XMM- Newton spectrum; the others are from the Chandra spectrum. The vertical dotted lines mark zero velocity. The bin-size is 22.2 mÅ and 10.0 mÅ for XMM-Newton and Chandra spectra, respectively. TABLE 1 LINE ANALYSIS RESULTS T (106 K) vb (km s- 1) 64(48, 104) 155(70, 301) 79(62, 132) 70(50, 172) NOVII (1015 cm- 2) 10.0(6.6, 14.7) 3.1(1.8, 8.2) 11.7(7.4, 18.5) 7.0(3.2, 12.7) NHAO (1019 cm- 2) 1.4(1.0, 2.0) 1.1(0.6, 1.8) 2.3(1.5, 3.7) 1.4(0.7, 2.2) · · · · · · 1.8(1.6, 2.0) 1.4(1.3, 1.6) 2.2(1.6, 2.7) 1.3(0.8, 2.0) 1.8(1.7, 2.1) Mrk 421a 4U 1957a LMC X3a 4U 1957b Haloc LMC X3b Haloc NOTE. -- The uncertainty ranges (upper limits) are quoted at 90% (95%) confidence levels. The dependence of the column density on the Galactic latitude (sinb factor) has been corrected with respect to Mrk 421 direction. AO is the oxygen abundance in unit of the solar value. a Results from fitting lines in each direction separately. b Results from a joint analysis of lines in the source and those in Mrk 421. c The absorption contribution from the halo gas beyond the source. See text for detail. 8.8(5.8, 12.7) 1.7(1.2, 2.2) 64(49, 108) < 0.9 < 0.7 < 4.8 < 3.7 · · · · · · ity dispersion vb, absorbing gas temperature T , and reference ionic column density NX (e.g., X=O VII or H) as fitting pa- rameters. It therefore can be used to conduct a joint anal- ysis of multiple absorption lines (including non-detections). 5 For the sight-line toward Mrk 421, we use O VII Kα, Kβ, and O VIII Kα absorption lines from the Chandra spectrum (YW07). For sight-line toward 4U 1957+11, we use O VII, O VIII, Ne VIII, Ne IX, Ne X Kα, and O VII Kβ lines in the Chandraand XMM-Newtonspectra where applicable, and as- sume the neon to oxygen abundance ratio to be the solar value (Yao & Wang 2006). From the joint analysis, we obtain the T , vb, and NOVII (or its equivalent NH for a given metallicity), as reported in Table 1. For ease of comparison, we take into account the dependence of the column density on the Galactic latitude (sinb factor; § 1) for the 4U 1957+11 sight-line with respect to the Mrk 421 direction (Table 1). Please note that in the above characterization we assume that the intervening hot gas in both sight-lines is isothermal. In reality, the temperature of both the disk and the halo gas could be a function of the vertical off-plane distance, the ra- dial off-Galactic center distance, or a combination of both (e.g., Toft et al. 2002; YW07). This simplified description aims to provide a direct comparison of the amount of absorp- tion between the two sight-lines. As demonstrated in Table 1 and Figure 2, the absorption 5 Please refer to Yao & Wang (2005, 2006) for the model and the joint analysis procedure. FIG. 2. -- The observed Mrk 421 spectrum (cross) around the oxygen ab- sorption lines and the best fit model (green histogram) convolved with the instrumental response. The red histograms mark the amount of absorption predicted for the Mrk 421 direction from the best fit of the lines observed in the spectra of 4U 1957+11 (leftpanels) and LMC X -- 3 (rightpanels). towards 4U 1957+11 can account for the bulk of the absorp- tion towards Mrk 421. To quantify the absorption contribution from the putative Galactic halo gas, we jointly analyze the ab- sorption lines in these two directions, "subtract" the absorp- tion spectrum toward 4U 1957+11 direction from that toward Mrk 421 direction, and attribute the residual absorption to the halo gas. We find that the halo gas is consistent with no con- tribution to the observed line absorptions. Assuming that the halo gas has the same thermal (e.g., T ) and dynamic (e.g., vb) properties as the disk gas, we estimate the column den- sity upper limit of the halo gas as NOVII < 4.8 × 1015 cm- 2 (or NHAO < 9 × 1018 cm- 2, where AO is the oxygen abundance in unit of the solar value; Table 1). The halo gas and the disk gas may have different T ; for the halo gas over a broad tempera- ture range of 0.4 - 2.5 × 106 K, we find NHAO < 1019 cm- 2. Following the same procedure as above, we characterize the line absorptions toward LMC X -- 3 (Table 1; see also Wang et al. 2005), and then search for the absorption feature of the halo gas beyond LMC X -- 3 by comparing it with Mrk 421. Again, we find that the line absorptions toward LMC X -- 3 can account for all the absorptions observed toward the Mrk 421 sight-line (Fig. 2), and obtain the upper limits of the col- umn density of the halo by jointly analyzing the sight-lines of LMC X -- 3 and Mrk 421 (Table 1). 4. DISCUSSION In this study, we have assumed that the absorption lines observed in the spectra of 4U 1957+11 are produced in the ISM. However, the photo-ionized in- or out-flow material in- trinsic to 4U 1957+11 could contaminate these lines. From the best fit to the Chandra spectrum in the range of 2 -- 23 Å, we estimate the source luminosity over 0.5 -- 10 keV as 10kpc × 1037 ergs s- 1, where D10kpc is the source dis- L = 1.19D2 tance in units of 10 kpc. A curve of growth analysis with a dispersion velocity (vb) of 0 km s- 1 gives a firm upper limit of the Ne IX column density to be NNeIX < 6.6 × 1017 cm- 2 (assuming the solar abundance of Ne). This is equivalent to a hydrogen column density NH < 1.1 × 1022 cm- 2, as- suming an ionization fraction of 0.5 for Ne IX. For the ab- sorber, the ionization parameter U = Lx/n(r)r2 must satisfy log(U) ≤ 2.5, since the Ne X Kα absorption line has not been detected (Kallman & McCray 1982). Further assuming a ra- dial gas density distribution n(r) ∝ (rw/r)2, where rw is the lo- 4 Yao et al. cation where wind launches and r > rw, we obtain rw > 50R⊙, which is much larger than the star separation ( < ∼6R⊙) of the system (estimated from its orbital period 9.33 hours and tak- ing an upper limit of the X-ray compact object MX < 16M⊙). These estimates make the in-flow scenario very unlikely. On the other hand, if the absorber is out-flow material, the lines are expected to be blue-shifted at velocities larger than the escape velocity of the system (e.g., GRO J1655 -- 40; Miller et al. 2006), which is 260 km s- 1 for 4U 1957+11 (taking MX = 10M⊙ and rw = 6R⊙). In contrast, the detected Ne IX Kα velocity is 0 ± 114 km s- 1. The above arguments suggest that the absorption lines are more likely produced in the ISM (see also Juett et al. 2006), although the intrinsic scenario can not be completely ruled out. We have compared the highly ionized line absorptions of O VII, O VIII, and Ne IX observed in the spectra of 4U 1957+11 and Mrk 421, and in the spectra of LMC X -- 3 and Mrk 421 to search for the large scale Galactic halo. We found that there is no significant X-ray absorption due to hot gas beyond either 4U 1957+11 or LMC X -- 3. These results are consistent with our previous conclusion that bulk of the absorptions observed toward the Mrk 421 sight-line are due to the hot gas around the Galactic disk with a scale height of ∼ 2 kpc based on a joint analysis of the absorption and emission data (YW07). Note that the upper limits obtained toward LMC X -- 3 are slightly lower than those toward 4U 1957+11 (Table 1). Some of the difference are due to the partial sampling of the Galac- tic disk by the latter sight-line, and the better spectral quality of LMC X -- 3 also matters. Large scale hot gaseous halos are commonly expected in modern disk formation models for massive spirals (e.g. White & Frenk 1991). For the Milky Way in particular, the hot gaseous halo can extend up to rvirial ∼ 250 kpc and the to- tal mass contained is expected to be ∼ 6 × 1010 M⊙, which is currently missing in the baryon mass inventory in the Lambda Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) cosmology (Dehnen & Binney 1998; Klypin et al. 2002; Sommer-Larsen 2006). Recently, Maller & Bullock (2004) assumed that the fragmentated warm clouds could be formed out of the hot gas halo and proposed a multiphase cooling scenario for the galaxy for- mation. This model alleviates the so-called "over-cooling" problem faced by the standard cooling model (e.g., Klypin et al. 2002). They then obtained a density profile for the resid- ual hot halo gas as a function of radius (Eq. 21 and Fig. 4 in Maller & Bullock 2004). Normalizing their density profile by requiring the total column density integrated from 10 to 250 kpc to be NHAO < 1019 cm- 2 (Tabel 1), we obtain the to- tal mass contained in the halo as MH < 1.2/AO × 1010 M⊙. Clearly, to match this upper limit with the total missing baryon mass in the MW, AO should be < 20% of the solar value. More recently, Hansen & Sommer-Larsen (2006) as- sumed that gaseous halos of galaxies are in a hydrostatic equi- librium state and that the gas density and the total mass den- sity profiles are power laws, and then derived a hot halo gas density profile for the MW-like galaxy (Fig. 2 in Hansen & Sommer-Larsen 2006). Again, normalizing their profile we obtain the total hot gas mass as < 2.2/AO × 109 M⊙, requir- ing AO to be < 3.7% of the solar value. Low metallicity of the hot halo gas is not surprising; the halo gas is believed to be primarily accreted from the inter- galactic medium that is expected to be metal poor. This would also suggest that the star formation and the associated stellar feedback via Type II supernovae (SNeII) that occurred in the Galactic disk and bulge are not important in regulating the metal content of the halo. Hot gas resulting from SNeII, if leaking into the halo (e.g., Mac Low & Ferrara 1999), may cool quickly enough (via adiabatic expansion and atomic line radiation) to form metal-rich cold clouds in the local environ- ment before homogenizing with the halo gas (Wang 2007). As these clouds return back to the disk plane as Galactic foun- tains, their interaction with the embedding hot gas could be another mechanism of warm cloud formation as required in multiphase cooling scenarios (Maller & Bullock 2004). The interfaces between these two media may harbor the bulk of HVCs as observed via O VI absorptions at large distance (e.g., Sembach et al. 2003). In this Letter, we derive the mass and metallicity limits on the putative Galactic halo by comparing the observed absorp- tion lines among the sight-lines of 4U 1957+11, LMC X -- 3, and Mrk 421. However, the amount of absorptions observed along different AGN sight-lines could vary substantially (e.g., Bregman & Lloyd-Davies 2007), which may be due to ad- ditional absorption components (e.g., 3C 273; Yao & Wang 2007b) and/or different absorbing gas properties. More com- parisons among other sight-lines are therefore needed to con- firm the presented results. We are grateful to Li Ji and the anonymous referee for their insightful comments, which helped to improve the pre- sentation of the paper. This work is supported by NASA through the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory contract SV3-73016 to MIT for support of the Chandra X-Ray Cen- ter under contract NAS 08-03060. Support from SAO/CXC grants AR6-7023 and AR7-8014 are also acknowledged. Behar, E., & Netzer, H. 2002, ApJ, 570, 165 Berkhuijsen, E., et al. 2006, AN, 327, 82 Birnboim, Y., & Dekel, A. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 349 Bregman, J. N., & Lloyd-Davies, E. J. 2007, ApJ in press, astro-ph/07071699 Canizares, C. R., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1144 Dehnen, W., & Binney, J., 1998, MNRAS, 294, 429 Fang, T., et al. 2003, ApJ, 586, 49 Fang, T., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 174 Fukugita, M., & Peebles, P. 2006, ApJ, 639, 590 Hansen, S., & Sommer-Larsen, J. 2006, ApJ, 653, L17 Juett, A., et al. , 2006, ApJ, 648, 1066 Kaastra, J, S., Werner, N., den Herder, J. W. A., et al. 2006, 652, 189 Kallman, T. R., & McCray, R. 1982, ApJS, 50, 263 Klypin, A., Zhao, H., & Sommerville, R. S. 2002, ApJ, 573, 597 REFERENCES Li, Z., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 147 Maller, A. H., & Bullock, J. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 694 Mac Low, M., & Ferrara, A. 1999, ApJ, 513, 142 Miller, J., et al. 2006, Nature, 441, 953 Nicastro, F., et al. 2002, ApJ, 573, 157 Nowak, M. A., & Wilms, J. 1999, ApJ, 522, 476 Pedersen, K., et al. 2006, New A., 11, 465 Savage, B., et al. 2003, ApJS, 146, 125 Sembach, K., et al. 2003, ApJS, 146, 165 Sommer-Larsen, J. 2006, 644, L1 Spitzer, L. 1956, ApJ, 124, 20 Toft, S., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 799 Tüllmann, R, et al. 2006, AA, 448, 43 Verner, D, A., et al. 1996, Atomic Data & Nuclear Data Tables, 64, 1-180 Wang, Q. D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 386 Limits on Hot Galactic Halo Gas 5 Wang, Q. D. 2007, EAS, 24, 59 Williams, R., Mathur, S., & Nicastro, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 856 Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914 White, S. D. M., & Frenk, C. S. 1991, ApJ, 379, 52 Yao, Y., & Wang, Q. D., 2005, ApJ, 624, 751 Yao, Y., & Wang, Q. D., 2006, ApJ, 641, 930 Yao, Y., & Wang, Q. D., 2007a, ApJ, 658, 1088 Yao, Y., & Wang, Q. D., 2007b, ApJ, 666, 242
astro-ph/9510010	2	9510	1996-04-22T12:40:49	Chaos, Fractals and Inflation	[ "astro-ph", "gr-qc", "hep-th" ]	In order to draw out the essential behavior of the universe, investigations of early universe cosmology often reduce the complex system to a simple integrable system. Inflationary models are of this kind as they focus on simple scalar field scenarios with correspondingly simple dynamics. However, we can be assured that the universe is crowded with many interacting fields of which the inflaton is but one. As we describe, the nonlinear nature of these interactions can result in a complex, chaotic evolution of the universe. Here we illustrate how chaotic effects can arise even in basic models such as homogeneous, isotropic universes with two scalar fields. We find inflating universes which act as attractors in the space of initial conditions. These universes display chaotic transients in their early evolution. The chaotic character is reflected by the fractal border to the basin of attraction. The broader implications are likely to be felt in the process of reheating as well as in the nature of the cosmic background radiation.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Chaos, Fractals and Inflation CWRU-P12-95, CFPA-95-TH-26 Neil J. Cornish† and Janna J. Levin⋆ †Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH 44106-7079 ⋆Center for Particle Astrophysics, UC Berkeley 301 Le Conte Hal l, Berkeley, CA 94720-7304 Abstract In order to draw out the essential behavior of the universe, investigations of early universe cosmology often reduce the complex system to a simple inte- grable system. Inflationary models are of this kind as they focus on simple scalar field scenarios with correspondingly simple dynamics. However, we can be assured that the universe is crowded with many interacting fields of which the inflaton is but one. As we describe, the nonlinear nature of these inter- actions can result in a complex, chaotic evolution of the universe. Here we illustrate how chaotic effects can arise even in basic models such as homoge- neous, isotropic universes with two scalar fields. We find inflating universes which act as attractors in the space of initial conditions. These universes display chaotic transients in their early evolution. The chaotic character is reflected by the fractal border to the basin of attraction. The broader impli- cations are likely to be felt in the process of reheating as well as in the nature of the cosmic background radiation. 05.45.+b, 95.10.E, 98.80.Cq, 98.80.Hw 6 9 9 1 r p A 2 2 2 v 0 1 0 0 1 5 9 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Typeset using REVTEX 1 I. INTRODUCTION The inflationary paradigm strives to deliver a smooth universe from random initial con- ditions. If inflation is a robust attractor in the space of initial conditions, then it earns its claim to naturalness and genericity [1,2]. A universe which hosts many different fields, including an inflaton candidate, can develop an extreme sensitivity to initial values. This sensitivity marks the onset of chaos. Chaotic dynamics does not in itself destroy the robust- ness of an inflationary phase. Rather, it can lead to some powerful and perhaps observable implications for a realistic universe. For instance, a fractal pattern in the spectrum of den- sity fluctuations could be generated. Also, the final phase of inflation marked by reheating would unavoidably be a setting for chaos. In simple cosmologies, the ultimate fate of the universe can be predicted once a set of initial conditions is prescribed. In a closed cosmology for instance, it can be determined from the initial prescription if the universe inflates or collapses. A plot in phase space will show regions or basins within which all of the initial conditions lead to the same outcome. There will be basins of inflation and basins of collapse. If the dynamics is not chaotic, these basins of attraction1 are distinctly separated by smooth, regular boundaries. If the dynamics becomes chaotic, then the smooth boundaries begin to break up, ultimately becoming fractal. The models described in the following sections are chosen on the grounds of simplicity, and do not necessarily conform to any standard inflationary scenario. In our current models the primary inflaton is weakly coupled and essentially not dynamical, leaving the chaotic dynamics to the other scalar fields. Multiply coupled fields are quite natural in any particle theory. The Higgs field for instance must couple to the standard model fermions in order to induce fermion masses. In supersymmetric theories, a glut of coupled particles is expected. The fields behave effectively like nonlinearly coupled harmonic oscillators and so naturally bring on chaos. In future studies we intend to connect more concretely to specific hybrid inflationary models [3] and draw out implications for the spectrum of fluctuations or the end of a realistic model. The main aim of this paper is to illustrate the complex dynamics that can arise in relatively simple cosmologies. In addition to highlighting the appearance of chaos in inflationary cosmology, we aim to demonstrate the power of fractals as a quantitative measure of chaos in relativity. In general relativity coordinate independent measures of chaos are of vital importance. One of the most valuable measures of a chaotic system in flat space, the Lyapunov exponents, can be removed by a simple coordinate transformation in curved space. Thus the usual coordinate dependent measures of chaos become ambiguous in a relativistic context. Topological signals such as fractal basins, cantori or stochastic layers in phase space are needed for conclusive evidence of chaos. In order to search for cantori or stochastic layers it is necessary to construct slices through phase space known as Poincar´e sections. Since Poincar´e sections rely on quasi- periodic behaviour, the system must complete many cycles for a useful picture to emerge. 1 Throughout the paper we loosely refer to attractors in phase space. In more formal terminology, the word attractor is reserved for dissipative systems. Strictly speaking, our attractors are just asymptotic regions of phase space. 2 Oftentimes relativistic systems are not so obliging as the evolution may end at singularities, such as the big crunch or inside a black hole. In these cases the dynamics is better suited to an outcomes based approach such as the study of fractal basin boundaries [4]. In a chaotic system the different possible outcomes will each have a basin of attraction in the space of initial conditions, with the basins separated by a fractal border. A specific examination of phase space will require a coordinate system to be chosen. One might worry that in a different time slicing, the fractal would disappear. This is not possible. A coordinate transformation must be smooth and differentiable. No smooth map can undo a truly fractal pattern as fractals are non-differentiable. While the features of a fractal may be altered by a coordinate transformation, the existence of a the fractal is unambiguous. The cosmological context we employ allows us to demonstrate the technique of fractal basin boundaries. What emerges is a definitive manifestation of chaos in cosmology. We have already commented that we focus on multi-field systems. If only one scalar field is present and the universe is closed, then there is still the possibility of chaotic regions in phase space [5–7]. However, in order to generate chaotic dynamics with just one matter field, the universe must oscillate between expansion and contraction many times. The requirement of many bounces makes these otherwise interesting solutions unlikely if not truly unphysical. We consider single field scenarios in §III. Since these bouncing candidates do not represent viable cosmologies, we turn our attention to many field systems and the demonstration of fractal basin boundaries in §IV-V. Also note, that while we study closed cosmologies, the chaotic transients can be seen in a universe which never collapses or bounces. When fields interact, the chaotic nature is therefore not limited to closed cosmologies. It is thus possible that there was a transient chaotic epoch in the history of our own universe. II. THE COSMOLOGICAL MODEL In the coming examples we consider closed Friedman-Robertson-Walker (FRW) uni- verses. For potential driven inflation to be successful the inflationary potential needs to be fairly constant. For our purposes the inflaton can be modeled by a simple cosmological constant. If this were the complete system there would be of course no chaotic dynamics. However, the universe is created bursting with matter fields. We model the matter content by a variety of conformally and minimally coupled fields. These matter fields interact and can incite chaos. For the inflationary cases at hand then, the chaotic behaviour is principally matter driven, i.e. chaos in Tµν causing chaotic evolution of gµν . The physical picture is that of a closed, pre-inflationary universe just exiting the Planck era. The space of initial conditions is probed by assigning three possible outcomes. Either the universe inflates forever, inflates for short spurts but then collapses, or collapses without any inflationary event. The outcome depends on the relative sizes of the various kinetic and potential energies in the matter fields. As the interaction between the matter fields is turned up the boundary which separates inflating from noninflating initial conditions blurs, eventually becoming fractal. While we only consider closed models in our outcomes based approach, the appearance of chaotic transients will be generic, regardless of curvature. This becomes clear since chaos is also nested within a given outcome basin. For instance, a universe will often go through 3 rocky beginnings, enduring many fits of inflation before taking off smoothly or collapsing. Within a collapse basin, the sensitivity to the initial conditions shows up as a random scatter in the maximum radius of the universe or in the final value of the fields. If the universe has managed to inflate by several e-folds there is no turning back as the kinetic energy which might interrupt inflation quickly redshifts away. This feature of the de Sitter attractor is often referred to as cosmic baldness. We shall see that while the de Sitter attractor might end up bald, it can have very hairy beginnings. We shall consider FRW universes described by the metric ds2 = dt2 − a2 dr2 1 − kr2 − r2dΩ2! , dr2 = a2 dτ 2 − 1 − kr2 − r2dΩ2! , where t is cosmic time and τ is conformal time. Throughout, dots will denote derivatives with respect to cosmic time and dashes will denote derivatives with respect to conformal time. The matter Lagrangian will contain various combinations of conformally, Ψ, and minimally, Φ, coupled scalar fields with a variety of interaction terms described by the potential V (Ψ, Φ): (1) 1 ∂µΦ∂ µΦ − 12 RΨ2 . LM = V − For comparison with the conformally coupled term, i.e. the last term in eqn (2), the gravi- tational Lagrangian is LG = − 1 12 R. We have chosen units where 4πG/3 = c = 1. In terms of cosmic time t the field equations read ∂µΨ∂ µΨ + (2) 1 2 1 2 Φ + 3H Φ + ∂ΦV = 0 , (3) Ψ = 0 , Ψ + 3H Ψ + ∂ΨV + R 6 a + a 2 Φ2 + ( Ψ + H Ψ)2 + a2 Ψ2 + Ψ∂ΨV − 2V ! = 0 . k The Ricci scalar can be related to the scale factor through R/6 = a/a + H 2 + k/a2 . The Hubble expansion factor is given by H = a/a. The total energy of the system is (5) (4) k k a2 − Φ2 − ( Ψ + H Ψ)2 − a2 Ψ2 − 2V = 0 . H = H 2 + The constraint eqn (6) can be obtained directly from Einstein’s field equations and represents the first integral of eqn (5). Since we are dealing with the entire universe, the system is necessarily conservative. We use eqn (6) to ensure that energy is in fact conserved. It is amusing to notice that if we isolate the matter sector, this subsystem looks dissipative. Energy is lost to the gravitational field through the friction terms ∼ 3H Φ. We can see the effects of dissipation within the 4 (6) larger context of the Hamiltonian system. For instance we can watch the matter tra jectories shrink down onto an attractor as the volume in phase space is dissipated (cf §V). In some cases it is profitable to recast the field equations in terms of conformal time τ , and the rescaled variables ψ = aΨ, φ = aΦ and U = a4V : φ′′ − a′′ a φ + ∂φU = 0 ψ ′′ + kψ + ∂ψ U = 0 (7) (8) a′ a (9) (10) (11) a′ a 1 a − a′′ + ka + (4U − ψ∂ψ U ) = 0 . φ!2 a φ′ − 1 The total energy of the system can be expressed as φ!2 a4H = (a′ )2 + ka2 − φ′ − − (cid:16)(ψ ′ )2 + kψ 2(cid:17) − 2U = 0 . A universe is said to inflate if the scale factor a accelerates in terms of cosmic time, i.e. a > 0. The cosmic time acceleration is given by a3  φ!2 2U − ψ∂ψ U − (ψ ′ )2 − kψ 2 − 2 φ′ − 1  . Notice that conformally coupled fields tend not to contribute to a positive acceleration. In other words, even with a potential ∝ Ψn , conformally coupled fields do not drive inflation (unless n < 2). The generalization of the above equations to describe two or more scalar fields of either type is direct. The field equations are invariant under the combined rescaling aa′′ − (a′ )2 a3 a = = a′ a V V → t → xt, a → xa, x2 , where x is a constant. This freedom is removed when we set our length scale by choosing dimensionfull values for quantities such as masses and coupling constants. As we describe below, the asymptotic solutions are of two kinds. The universe eventually approaches a smooth de Sitter phase or it ultimately collapses into a big crunch. In highly simplified models the division between these two outcomes can be expressed as a simple partition in the space of initial conditions. However, we shall see that even in simple models with two interacting fields the division is no longer clean, as the boundaries separating the different outcomes are no longer smooth curves but fractals. (12) A. From integrability to chaos When the various scalar fields are massless and do not interact the equations of motion can be integrated exactly and there is no chaos. Before launching into the chaotic dynamics, 5 we take a look in this subsection at the two asymptotic possibilities, the big crunch and de Sitter expansion, which will be the basis of our outcomes approach in the following sections. We also show the phase space portraits for the non-interacting, closed system. In Ref. [1], a detailed analysis was given of the phase space portraits for a single, massive, minimally coupled field in a universe with arbitrary curvature. According to their portraits, the tra jectories drawn are untangled and therefore are not chaotic. As the authors noted, there do exist a set of measure zero oscillatory solutions which do show chaotic behavior [5]. At the close of §III we return to discuss this special set of perpetually bouncing solutions. For now we demonstrate the non-chaotic phase space for a universe full of noninteracting, garden variety fields (both minimally and conformally coupled). Since it is impossible to tell one scalar field from another in the absence of interactions, the general case of N minimally coupled and M conformally coupled scalar fields reduces to a universe with one field of each type. For a universe with a scalar field of each type and cosmological constant Λ the equations simplify to ψ = A cos τ , (13) ′ = ′ a (14) (15) φ a ! B a2 , = ±sA2 + 2a4Λ + B 2 a2 − a2 . The phase space is divided by a separatrix into two classes of tra jectories, those that termi- nate at the big crunch and those that inflate. The form of the solutions can easily be found in the neighborhood of these two geometrically distinct attractors. When the dynamics is dominated by potential terms, such as a cosmological constant Λ, the universe undergoes exponential expansion and matter fields are redshifted away: √2Λ τ ! , φ ∼ a−2 , ψ ∼ cos τ . √2Λ t ∼ − 1 a ∼ e Conversely, when the dynamics is dominated by the kinetic energy of the matter fields or spatial curvature, the universe collapses to the big crunch at time τc : a ∼ τ − τc 1/2 , φ ∼ a ln a , ψ ∼ cos τ for B 6= 0 and for B = 0: a ∼ τ − τc , φ ∼ constant , ψ ∼ cos τ . The separatrix that partitions these possibilities is defined by the tra jectory with A2 + 2√A4 + 3B 2 6(A2 + √A4 + 3B 2)2 . For these simple, integrable cosmologies the basins of attraction for the big crunch and de Sitter attractors are separated by a smooth curve. This smooth curve is a portion of the (16) Λ = (17) (18) (19) 6 separatrix. In Fig. 1 we display phase space portraits in the (a, a′ ) and (ψ , ψ ′ ) planes for a universe with B = 0 and Λ = 1/8. The cross-hatched region is the basin of the big crunch attractor and the solid line is the separatrix. When interactions are included the separatrix breaks up and is replaced by a fractal curve. The gaps in the broken separatrix have the structure of a Cantor set. The broken separatrix no longer partitions phase space and tra jectories may diffuse through it. For example, a universe that was destined to collapse in the integrable case might diffuse through the broken barrier and inflate. The breaking of the separatrix is reflected in the fractal nature of the basin boundaries for chaotic universes. The smooth basin boundaries shown in Fig. 1 should be compared to the fractal boundaries seen in Figs. 4 and 7. The break up of the separatrix is further described in §IV. Even when interactions are included, the asymptotic behaviour of tra jectories on either attractor is completely regular and non-chaotic. Examples of this fact are given in §V. In the parlance of dynamical systems theory, the attractors are neither strange nor chaotic. The chaotic behaviour is transient [8], and occurs when tra jectories approach the broken separatrix. Physically this corresponds to an epoch in which the universe coasts with a fairly constant radius but with wildly varying acceleration. During this epoch the kinetic and potential energies in the system fight for supremacy and the universe teeters between collapse and violent expansion. If the kinetic energy wins the day, the universe collapses and the asymptotic solution can be found by neglecting all potential terms in the equations of motion. Conversely, if the potential energy wins the day the asymptotic solution can be found by neglecting kinetic energy terms. The transient nature of the chaos is similar to that found in the Mixmaster universe [9,10], where it has been shown that the underlying attractors are neither strange nor chaotic [11]. We remark that transient chaos appears to be the hallmark of relativistic systems. III. COSMOLOGIES WITH A SINGLE SCALAR FIELD Since we work with a closed FRW cosmology, there is only one parameter describing the gravitational sector – namely, the scale factor. The necessary elements for chaos are present if the scale factor interacts even with just one matter field. However, the dynamical timescale for the onset of chaos is longer than the life of one universe. The chaotic dynamics results as the two oscillators interact. Typically, at least a few oscillations are needed for the effects to surface. We discuss such an example in this section. On the other hand, if there are many interacting matter fields in the universe, then their chaotic evolution will make an impact during the lifetime of one universe. The examples of the following section reveal chaos on such short time scales. We begin with an example that is chaotic, but only on a timescale longer than the life of one universe. The model describes a single, conformally coupled scalar field in a closed (k = 1) universe. We choose the potential to have both a mass term and a cosmological constant Λ: U = 1 2 m2a2ψ 2 + a4Λ . 7 (20) This example has previously been considered by Calzetta and El Hasi [6,7]. The Hamiltonian takes the form (21) a4H = (a′ )2 + a2 − ((ψ ′ )2 + ψ 2 + m2a2ψ 2 ) − 2a4Λ = 0 , which, aside from the wrong sign for the gravitational contributions, is the Hamiltonian for two coupled harmonic oscillators. For a metric with only one dynamical degree of freedom it is always possible to perform a combined field redefinition and conformal transformation to a coordinate system in which the dynamics appears to be nonsingular. By using conformal, rather than cosmic time to describe the evolution of this system, the dynamical equations can be smoothly integrated past the big bang and big crunch singularities at a = 0. This allows many cosmic cycles to be considered if we continue the scale factor into negative values. When evolved through a series of cosmic cycles the system is clearly chaotic [6,7], as we might expect for nonlinearly coupled oscillators. It should be noted that the cosmic cycles are physically meaningless as all memory of the previous cycle is erased at each big crunch singularity. By introducing the fiction of cosmic cycles, the dynamics can be surveyed using the standard tools of Poincar´e sections (return maps) and Lyapunov exponents. Lyapunov ex- ponents measure the rate of separation of tra jectories in phase space. Only if tra jectories separate exponentially fast do they have positive exponents. Systems with positive Lya- punov exponents are said to exhibit sensitive dependence on initial conditions - one of the two ingredients of chaos (the other being the mixing and folding of tra jectories). The in- verse of the positive Lyapunov exponents is referred to as the Lyapunov timescale. This timescale sets the dynamical timescale over which chaotic effects make themselves felt. In general relativity, Lyapunov exponents must be used with extreme care, if at all, as they are coordinate dependent. Indeed, a simple coordinate transformation can give a non-chaotic system positive exponents and a chaotic system vanishing exponents. Putting these reservations aside, we may compare the Lyapunov time to the time taken to complete a cosmic cycle, and infer whether or not chaotic effects can make themselves felt in the lifetime of a single universe. Typically, the Lyapunov timescale was found to be in the range 10 → 1000 cosmic cycles. Even when the mass is taken to be very large, the Lyapunov timescale is always found to be greater than half a cosmic cycle, or in other words, the timescale for chaos to become important always exceeds the life of one universe. This result is easily understood. The chaotic behaviour is due to resonances between the two oscillating fields a and ψ . In order for the resonance to take effect, both fields typically need to oscillate several times. However, a can only complete half an oscillation before the big crunch, making it exceedingly difficult for a chaotic resonance to occur. In Ref. [6] it was argued that chaos had been viewed within the span of one life cycle. Their conclusion was based on what appeared to be a scatter between initial values of the matter fields and the final values. The correlation between initial and final values of the scalar field ψ was found to be 0.01. However, this low value for the correlation actually stems from a coarse sampling of a high frequency function. By regenerating Fig. 6. of Ref. [6] with a sampling rate that is ten times higher we see from Fig. 2. that the true correlation coefficient is 1.00. This confirms that the system shows no meaningful chaotic effects in the life of one universe. 8 , (22) V = m2Φ2 + Similar conclusions hold for universes inhabited by a single minimally coupled scalar field. Again, the equations of motion can lead to chaotic behaviour as they are nonlinear and have phase space dimension greater than 2. However, meaningful chaotic effects can only occur if the universe itself oscillates. The dynamics of an inflationary model driven by a minimally coupled scalar field with potential 1 λ 0(cid:17)2 4 (cid:16)Φ2 − Φ2 2 was studied by Belinskii et al. [1], and with λ = 0 by Hawking [12] and Page [5]. Typical tra jectories were not chaotic. Rather, they see the universe smoothly evolve from the big bang to the big crunch with various amounts of inflation [1]. However, the inflationary potential allows some atypical tra jectories for which the universe undergoes a number of nonsingular bounces [12]. Page [5] suggested that there exist an uncountably infinite but discrete set of perpetually bouncing universes with vanishing Lebesgue measure but non- vanishing fractal dimension. If Page’s suggestion is correct, it would prove that the dynamics is chaotic as his “fractal set of perpetually bouncing universes” corresponds to what is now known as a strange repeller [13]. In contrast to the fictional cosmic cycles used to describe a conformally coupled scalar field, Page’s bouncing universes are true, nonsingular solutions. However, these solutions have obvious drawbacks as plausible cosmologies. As remarked in Ref. [1], the fine tuning required to arrive at these chaotic tra jectories rules them out as a robust physical model displaying chaotic behaviour. Perhaps in a model of the early universe that generically displays nonsingular bounces we can hope to see interesting chaotic effects caused by an oscillating scale factor. In the absence of such a model we have to look to additional matter fields to provide the nonlinear resonances needed to incite chaos. IV. COSMOLOGIES WITH TWO CONFORMALLY COUPLED FIELDS If additional fields occupy the universe, then the scale factor will not be the principle source of chaos. Two scalar fields can oscillate many times in the lifetime of one uni- verse, leading to truly chaotic behaviour. To demonstrate the chaos we show the fractal basin boundaries for a universe which contains two conformally coupled fields which inter- act through the potential U = 1a2ψ 2 m2 1 + 1 ψ 2 2 + λ2ψ 2 2a2ψ 2 m2 2 + a4Λ . 1 1 2 2 The period of oscillation for each field is governed by its effective mass. We define the reduced effective mass for each field as the derivative with respect to the field of the field eqn (9). In other words, M 2 ψ has the form of ∂ 2W/∂ψ2 were W is anything which acts as a potential in the equations of motion: 2 − 4Λa2)1/2 , 2ψ 2 1 − m2 1ψ 2 Ma = (1 − m2 (24) (23) 2 )1/2 , 1a2 + 2λ2ψ 2 M1 = (1 + m2 1 )1/2 . 2a2 + 2λ2ψ 2 M2 = (1 + m2 9 (25) (26) Increasing m1 , m2 , Λ and λ slows the recollapse of a and speeds the oscillation of ψ1 and ψ2 , thus increasing the probability of chaotic resonances. However, if m1 or m2 greatly exceed λ, the resonances will be washed out and no chaos will be seen. Conversely, if m1 or m2 are both zero, the oscillations tend to freeze when ψ1 and ψ2 hit small values, again making chaotic resonances unlikely. To gain some intuition we can find a simple analytic approximation which corresponds to a familiar chaotic system. During the ma jority of the universe’s evolution, the scale factor varies much more slowly than the scalar fields so that a′/a ≪ ψ ′i/ψi . The scalar fields behave like coupled nonlinear oscillators, adiabatically pumped by the slowly varying scale factor. To leading order we can ignore the adiabatic pumping all together and study the scalar field dynamics in a fixed background (a′ ≈ 0). This approximation is particularly good for describing universes that are vacillating between collapse and inflationary expansion. Importantly, this is just the region where the chaotic transients occur that destroy the smooth separatrix of the integrable model described in §II A. When a′ ≈ 0 the dynamics simplifies to that of two coupled oscillators: 1 ψ1 + 2λ2ψ 2 ψ ′′1 + ω 2 2 ψ1 = 0 , 2 ψ2 + 2λ2ψ 2 ψ ′′2 + ω 2 1 ψ2 = 0 , (27) (28) i a2 is the fixed frequency of the uncoupled (λ = 0) oscillators. The above i = 1 + m2 where ω 2 system of equations describes a known chaotic system [14], and the transition to chaos as λ is increased can be studied using the Chirikov resonance overlap condition [15]. Having established that the fast variables ψ1 and ψ2 behave chaotically, we can then consider how they backreact on the slow variable a. When looked at on timescales long compared to the periods of the scalar fields, the evolution of the scale factor is similar to Brownian motion, and can be described in terms of chaotic diffusion equations [8]. It is this buffeting of the scale factor by the matter fields that breaks the separatrix in the (a, a′ ) plane and causes the universe to evolve in a chaotic manner. Returning to the full, unapproximated equations we numerically investigate the phase space of initial conditions. For a given set of initial conditions we can identify three main outcomes. The first possibility sees the universe expand and collapse without any inflationary burst. The second possibility sees the universe undergo one or many short bursts of inflation, but failing to become a macroscopic universe. The third possibility sees the universe sustain a prolonged and violent period of inflation resulting in the formation of a macroscopic universe. The first and second possibilities (coloured Black and Grey respectively) combine to form the big crunch basin of attraction. This artificial division of the big crunch basin is mostly for visual effect. There is a fourth possible outcome that should be mentioned. There are a set of tra jectories with zero Lebesgue measure that oscillate eternally, never entirely collapsing or reaching the de Sitter attractor. These tra jectories form the border between the big crunch and de Sitter basins of attraction. We will see that these tra jectories belong to a fractal set of perpetually bouncing universes. In the parlance of dynamical systems theory, this set forms the stable manifold of a strange repeller [8]. The three possibilities are displayed graphically in Fig. 3 for the choice of parameters (Λ = 0.0001, m1 = 0, m2 = 0.05, λ = 1) and initial conditions {a(0) = 2, ψ1 = 0.4, ψ2 = 10 6, ψ ′2 = 20}. The initial values of ψ ′1 are {−23.31, −23.32, −23.33}, and a′ (0) is fixed by the Hamiltonian constraint. The fact that minute changes in the initial conditions can lead to such dramatic changes in the outcome suggest that the fate of our model universe is indeed chaotic. This suspicion can be confirmed by studying the boundary between the basins of attraction of the three outcomes. Since the basins are embedded in a six dimensional phase space, we are forced to consider lower dimensional slices through the boundary. In Fig. 4 we display a two- dimensional slice in the ψ1 – ψ ′1 plane for universes with parameters and conditions identical to those used in Fig. 3. The three basins of attraction (Black, Grey, White) are dramatically intermixed strange basins, as at least a portion of the boundaries are fractal. The boundaries near the origin are regular and smooth while the outer boundaries appear fragmented. A detail of the outer region is shown in Fig. 5, visually confirming the fractal nature of the boundary. Repeated magnification reveals similar striated pictures on all scales. Rather than rely on these qualitative features, we may quantify the fractal nature of the boundary in terms of the fractal dimension. There are many definitions of fractal dimension that we may choose from, but the one best suited to our situation is the box counting dimension. On a two-dimensional slice through phase space we cover the fractal with a grid of squares with side length ε. We then count the number, N (ε), of squares needed to cover the fractal, i.e. the number of squares containing more than one colour. The box dimension dB is defined by . (29) ln N dB = − lim ln ε ε→0 For self-similar structures the formal limit ε → 0 need not be taken, and in all practical situations we are only interested in the existence of such scaling laws over a large, but not necessarily infinite, range of scales. Since the fractal dimension is not invariant under homeomorphisms, it is not a true topological invariant. However, it is invariant under diffeomorphisms, so it does provide a topological measure in general relativity. The existence of fractal structures in phase space provides a coordinate independent signal of chaos in relativity. The importance of the fractal dimension of the basin boundaries can be described in terms of final state sensitivity [16]. Consider an initial configuration near the basin boundary, where the uncertainty in the initial conditions describes an N-dimensional ball of radius δ in the N-dimensional phase space. The final state sensitivity fδ is the fraction of phase space volume which has an uncertain outcome due to the uncertainty in the initial conditions, and is given by fδ = δα , α = N − dB . For a non-chaotic system α = 1 and the final state sensitivity is directly proportional to the initial uncertainty. For chaotic systems however, 0 < α < 1, and the uncertainty in the outcome is greater than the uncertainty in the initial conditions. For example, if α = 0.47, a 50% reduction in the initial uncertainty only reduces the final state uncertainty by 28%. In this way, the dimension of the basin boundary is a direct measure of “sensitive dependence on initial conditions”. (30) 11 In Fig. 6 we display the plot used to determine the fractal dimension of Fig. 5. Because the three boundaries are densely interwoven in this case, we chose only to calculate the dimension of the boundary between the big crunch and de Sitter attractors, i.e. counting Grey and Black as one basin. Using an 840 × 840 grid we found the dimension to be 1.58 ± 0.02. The grid size of 840 = 23 × 3 × 5 × 7 was chosen as it has the most factors of any number below 1000. The curvature of the data points at small and large ε is to be expected. For large ε the covering is very inefficient, while for small ε the squares saturate the resolution used to generate the fractal. These effects cause dB to tilt toward 2 for large ǫ and toward 1 for small ǫ. Despite these limitations, accurate fractal dimensions can be obtained very quickly and easily. For different choices of parameters we found fractal dimensions ranging from 1 to 1.96, essentially filling the allowed range dB = [1, 2]. The boundary was found to be fractal on all possible two-dimensional slices. For example, in Fig. 7, the boundary is shown in the a – a′ plane for a slice which intersects Fig. 3 along the line ψ1 = 1.0. The fractal dimension of this slice was found to be dB = 1.37 ± 0.02. While the previous chaotic pictures were typical of those found, the dynamics of the system is not always chaotic. For small values of λ, m1 , m2 (at fixed scaling x) the dynamics is near integrable and the basins are not strange, but regular. In Fig. 8 we increment λ while keeping all other parameters and initial conditions fixed. The mixing of the basins is reminiscent of the blending of viscous fluids. The dimension of the basin boundary for λ = 0.5 was found to be dB = 0.99 ± 0.02, which is consistent with a dimension of 1. So, within errors, this boundary is smooth and non-chaotic. To compare, the dimensions of the boundaries for λ = 2.0 was dB = 1.16 ± 0.05 (Grey-White) and dB = 1.26 ± 0.05 (Grey-Black). An important property of dynamical systems with strange attractor basins is that the chaotic dynamics is not restricted to phase space tra jectories near the fractal boundaries. One way to see this might be to use the fiction of cosmic cycles to follow the evolution of tra jectories starting in the big crunch basin. The Lyapunov exponents and Poincar´e sections for these tra jectories would reveal chaotic behaviour across the basin. However, we are not really interested in effects which take longer than one universe’s lifetime to make themselves felt. Instead we plot in Fig. 9 the correlation between the initial value of ψ1i and the value at the point of maximum expansion, ψ1m . The graphs are for a ψ ′1 = 0 slice through the big crunch basin of Fig. 8 with λ = 2.0. The big crunch basin stretches from ψ1 = 0 to ψ1 ∼ 2.9 (and similarly for negative ψ1 ). A general increase in frequency with increasing ψ1i requires that we use several plots, each covering half the region of the last, to cover the basin. Unlike the regular plot seen in Fig. 2, the relationship between initial and final values of ψ1 is highly erratic, with apparently random changes in frequency and amplitude. V. COSMOLOGIES WITH MINIMALLY AND CONFORMALLY COUPLED FIELDS The chaotic behaviour seen in the previous system is not restricted to conformally coupled fields. Similar behaviour is found for minimally coupled fields with the same choice of potential. The main difference in this case comes from the scalar fields themselves being a source of inflation, in addition to the cosmological constant. The acceleration in this 12 1 2 1 2 (31) 1Φ2 m2 1 + example is given by a = 2a (cid:18)Λ + 2(cid:19) , 2 − Φ2 1 − Φ2 1Φ2 2 + λ2Φ2 2Φ2 m2 where we have reverted to the unscaled field variables. These models are able to successfully inflate even when there is no cosmological constant, in a manner similar to Linde’s “chaotic inflation” [17]. However, we did not see any strange basins when Λ = 0 as successful inflation generally required the fields to become stuck high up in their potentials after just a few oscillations. Otherwise, their ability to climb high enough was lost due to friction and redshifting of kinetic energy. It may be that chaotic behaviour does occur when Λ = 0, but it is difficult to search for as the inflationary bursts must be followed for ∼ 60 e-folds in comparison to the ∼ 5 − 10 e-folds required to ensure we have reached the de Sitter attractor when Λ 6= 0. In Fig. 10 we display the basins of attraction in the Φ1 - Φ1 plane for universes with (m1 = 0, m2 = 0.04, Λ = 0.00005, λ = 1.0) and fixed initial conditions {a(0) = 10.0, Φ2 = Φ2 = 0.16}. A detail of the outer boundary is shown in Fig. 11, where the dimension was 0.4, found to be 1.54 ± 0.02. Because the scalar fields themselves contribute to the inflationary bursts there is typically far more of the Grey basin than we saw for conformally coupled fields. We can compare an analysis of the chaotic tra jectories with the non-chaotic tra jectories of §II A. While the universe is expanding (H > 0), we see from eqn (3) that the scalar field dynamics is effectively that of a damped harmonic oscillator. Conversely, as the universe contracts the dynamics is that of a pumped harmonic oscillator. This behaviour is apparent in Fig. 12, where we have displayed typical tra jectories leading to the de Sitter and big crunch attractors. For the de Sitter attractor the scalar fields spiral into a fixed point as cosmic baldness asserts itself, while for the big crunch attractor the scalar fields first spiral in and then spiral out again as the universe collapses. The de Sitter attractor has an interesting structure when two fields are present as one scalar field gets locked at a constant value. The attractor is of the form a = ac exp(√2Λt) , 3√2Λ t! cos ω t , Φ2 = Φ2c exp − 2 2c exp(−3√2Λt) t Φ1 = Φ1c "1 + λ2Φ2 3√2Λ sub ject to the restriction 2ω cos2 ω t + 3√2Λ cos ω t sin ω t 2ω (9Λ + 2ω 2) !# , (32) (33) (34) + 2 + 2λ2Φ2 ω 2 = m2 1c − For reference, the tra jectory in Fig. 12a has Φ1c = 0.00573, Φ2c = 105.9 and ω = 0.03796. The big crunch attractor is unchanged from the one-field case, and takes the form (35) Λ . 9 2 13 a = ac (tc − t)1/3 , Φ1 ∼ Φ1c ln(tc − t) , (36) (37) (38) Φ2 ∼ Φ2c ln(tc − t) , 1c + Φ2 with Φ2 2c = 1/9. The tra jectory shown in Fig. 12b has tc = 200.004, ac = 13.68, Φ1c = 0.294 and Φ2c = 0.167. Since we are able to write down analytic solutions for tra jectories on the attractors, it is clear that the de Sitter and big crunch attractors are non-chaotic. The chaotic behaviour seen during the evolution of the universe is restricted to the 5 → 10 transient orbits seen in Fig. 12. The fractal nature of the attractor basin boundaries is due entirely to these brief chaotic transients. We close with a word on a mixed cosmology which contains one minimally coupled and one conformally coupled scalar field. The conformally coupled scalar field Ψ is taken to be massless. When Ψ’s coupling to the minimally coupled scalar field Φ is small it behaves like radiation. The interaction potential is taken to be V = 1 2 m2Φ2 + λ2Ψ2Φ2 + Λ . (39) As before, the minimally coupled scalar field is able to contribute a negative pressure to that of the inflaton, thereby increasing the likelihood of inflationary bursts. Again, this increases the proportion of Grey over what we saw for two conformally coupled fields. By viewing the basins in the a - a plane we see some rather striking ink-blot and crystal boundaries. An example of this is shown in Fig. 13 for the choice of parameters (m = Ψ = 0.08}. A detail 0.05, Λ = 0.0001, λ = 2), and fixed initial conditions {Φ = 0.2, Ψ = 0.1, of the Grey-White crystal boundary is shown in Fig. 14. The high degree of self-similarity of this fractal allowed a particularly accurate determination of the fractal dimension using a standard 840 × 840 grid. The dimension was found to be dB = 1.484 ± 0.005. The visually less fractal Grey-Black ink-blot boundary was found to have a smaller fractal dimension of dB = 1.11 ± 0.05, with the larger error due to a lower degree of self-similarity. In addition to studying different combinations of minimally and conformally coupled scalar fields, we also considered a variety of polynomial potentials V (Φ, Ψ). The qualitative results were the same for all cases, showing that chaotic evolution was a generic feature of all multi-field models. VI. DISCUSSION The early universe is likely to be home to many interacting fields. We have show that if these interactions are sufficiently strong, the evolution of the universe will be chaotic. The fractal basin boundaries reveal the chaos in a coordinate independent manner. Additionally, the method does not require one universe to pass through many cycles. We now have to ask how prevalent chaotic behaviour will be in particular models of inflation, and what implications it might have for processes such as reheating or galaxy formation. 14 One model of inflation where chaotic dynamics is bound to be important is hybrid infla- tion. Hybrid models employ several interacting scalar fields, and arise naturally in various supersymmetric theories where the breaking of large gauge groups employs many Higgs par- ticles [18]. If in the early stages the universe inflates in jolts, an exciting possibility exists for the spectrum of primordial density fluctuations. Chaotic resonances could lead to a fractal power distribution, perhaps helping to explain the hierarchical clustering seen in the current universe. Moreover, chaotic evolution of the scale factor would leave a unique imprint on the gravitational waves produced during inflation [19]. Any chaotic behaviour would have to occur within the last ∼ 60 e-folds of inflation to be observable today. This would require some artificial fine tuning in a single field model but may be more natural in a hybrid model. Even in inflationary models where chaotic evolution is unimportant at early stages, chaos is sure to play an important role at the end stages. To illustrate, consider again a hybrid model. The fields to which the inflaton couples dictate the occurrence of the true vacuum and so control the nature of the exit from inflation. The setting is prime for chaotic interactions which would certainly impact on the exit style. More generically, at the end of any inflation model, the universe reheats as the inflaton oscillates about the minimum of its potential. Particles are thereby produced through the inflaton’s coupling to other matter fields. If the matter fields are dynamical and chaos reigns, then the process of entropy production would deserve rethinking. The importance of parametric resonances, which are closely related to chaotic behaviour, has already been stressed in this context [20,21]. It seems appropriate to consider how chaotic dynamics might impact on “chaotic” infla- tion [17]. In chaotic inflation different patches of the universe are taken to have different values of the inflaton and matter fields. In some patch, it is argued, the inflaton is suffi- ciently high up in the potential and the matter fields are sufficiently small so as to permit a long-lived inflationary epoch [2]. For initial field values deep within a basin, away from the fractal borders, the usual arguments hold and the chaotic inflation paradigm is largely unaffected. However, if in a given patch the field values are near a fractal basin boundary, it can become difficult to find a patch of any size across which the conditions are regular enough to allow this thinking. Even the slightest variation in the initial conditions across the patch will lead to an entirely different outcome. Due to the self-similar nature of the fractal, no matter how small you try to make the patch, there will still be slight variations in the conditions and hence the outcome. For cosmological conditions in the vicinity of the fractal basin boundary then, the simple FRW thinking must be abandoned. For similar reasons, caution would be needed for slow-roll initial conditions as well. In fact the slow-roll scenario will likely be more fragile as the inflaton is more easily kicked around. For chaotic initial conditions by contrast the field high up in its potential is resiliant against the influence of kicks and bumps. Aside from direct observational effects there are also some important theoretical im- plications raised by chaotic evolution. For example, chaotic systems are characterised by an entropy, the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy, which is related to the spectrum of Lyapunov exponents. This introduces a chaotic arrow of time in addition to the cosmological and thermodynamic arrows of time. As well, it raises the question of a possible connection be- tween the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy and the thermodynamic entropy released at the end of inflation. Another issue raised by chaotic dynamics concerns the recovery of a semiclassical limit in quantum cosmology due to the breakdown of the WKB approximation in chaotic 15 systems [22]. We have suggested a few implications for chaotic dynamics in largely unexplored terrain. Chaos theory grew out of Poincar´e’s study of the solar system, and with its development came insights into the intricate structures of our neighborhood such as the asteroid belt and saturn’s rings. It seems fitting for chaos to have an impact not only on the evolution of the solar system but also on the birth of the universe. We are left to ask if chaotic fingerprints have been left on the large-scale landscape as they were on the landscape of our own solar system. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We have enjoyed discussions with Matt Holman and Jihad Touma. We thank John Barrow, Norm Frankel, Andrei Linde and Don Page for their helpful comments. We are indebted to Carl Dettmann for making his original programs available to us, and to Jacques Legare for his help in making modifications. 16 REFERENCES [1] V. A. Belinskii, L. P. Grishchuk, I. M. Khalatnikov and Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Phys. Lett. B155, 232 (1985); V. A. Belinskii, L. P. Grishchuk, I. M. Khalatnikov and Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Sov. Phys. JETP 62, 195 (1985). [2] D. S. Goldwirth and T. Piran, Phy. Rep. 214, No. 4, 223 (1992); D. S. Goldwirth and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. D40, 3263 (1989); A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B162, 281 (1985); R. H. Brandenberger and J. H. Kung, Phys. Rev. D42, 1008 (1990). [3] A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B259, 38 (1991); A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D49, 748 (1994). [4] C. P. Dettmann, N. E. Frankel and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D50, R618 (1994); Frac- tals, 3, 161 (1995). [5] D. N. Page, Class. Quantum Grav. 1, 417 (1984). [6] E. Calzetta and C. El Hasi, Class. Quant. Grav. 10, 1825 (1993). [7] E. Calzetta and C. El Hasi, Phys. Rev. D51, 2713 (1995). [8] E. Ott, Chaos in dynamical systems, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993). [9] C. Misner, Astrophys. J. 151, 431 (1968). [10] J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rep. 85, 1 (1982). [11] P. Ma and J. Wainwright, Deterministic Chaos in General Relativity, eds. A. Burd, A. Coley and D. Hobill (Plenum, New York, 1994) p.449. [12] S. W. Hawking, Lectures at the NATO Summer School on Relativity, Groups, and Topol- ogy in Les Houches, France. (1983). [13] L. P. Kadanoff and C. Tang, Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1276 (1984); H. Kantz and P. Grassberger, Physica D17, 75 (1985). [14] B. V. Chirkov and D. L. Shepelyansky, JETP Lett. 34, 163 (1981); G. K. Savvidy, Phys. Lett. B130, 303 (1983); G. Contopoulos, H. E. Kandrup and D. Kaufmann, Physica D64, 310 (1993). [15] B. V. Chirikov, Phys. Rep. 52, 265 (1979). [16] C. Grebogi, S. McDonald, E. Ott, and J. Yorke, Phys. Lett. A99, 415 (1983). [17] A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B129, 177 (1983). [18] A. Guth, L. Randall and Soljacic in preparation (1995). [19] L. P. Grishchuk and M. Solokhin, Phys. Rev. D43, 2566 (1991). [20] L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3195 (1994). [21] Y. Shtanov, J. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D51, 5438 (1995). [22] M. V. Berry, Chaotic Behaviour of Deterministic Systems, Les Houches, Session 36, eds. G. Ioos, R. Helleman and R. Stora, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1983). 17 FIGURES a′ > < ψ ′ a ψ Phase space tra jectories in the (a, a′ ) and (ψ , ψ ′ ) planes for universes with FIG. 1. non-interacting scalar fields. The solid line is the separatrix and the cross hatched regions mark the big crunch basin of attraction. 18 ψf ψi FIG. 2. The correlation between initial and final values of the scalar field (a) is compared to the apparently chaotic behaviour seen in (b) where the sampling rate is ten times lower. FIG. 3. The three possible outcomes for the universe. In each case the solid line is the scale factor a and the dashed line is the scaled acceleration aa3 . The initial values for ψ ′1 are −23.31, −23.32 and −23.33 respectively. 19 ψ ′1 FIG. 4. The basins of attraction for universes similar to those shown in Fig. 3. ψ1 ψ ′1 ψ1 FIG. 5. A detail of Fig. 4. 20 FIG. 6. Finding the fractal dimension for Fig. 5. The solid line is a least-squares fit to the box counting data. The dimension was found to be dB = 1.58 ± 0.02. a′ FIG. 7. A slice in the a - a′ plane which intersects the ψ1 - ψ ′1 plane of Fig. 4. along the line ψ1 = 1.0. a 21 ψ ′1 ψ1 FIG. 8. The road to chaos: As λ is incremented from 0.5 to 2.0, the nonlinear distortion of the attractor basin boundaries mounts. Once λ exceeds 1.0 the mixing is so strong that the boundaries become fractured, and eventually, fractal. The graphs were generated for the choice of parameters and initial conditions Λ = 0.00002, a0 = 10, ψ2 = 5.0, ψ ′2 = 10.0, m1 = 0.2, m2 = 0.1. FIG. 9. The correlation between ψ1i (vertical axis) and ψ1m (horizontal axis) on a ψ ′1 = 0 slice through the big crunch basin of attraction of Fig. 8. (λ = 2.0). 22 Φ1 Φ1 FIG. 10. Basins of attraction in the Φ1 - Φ1 plane for universes containing two minimally coupled scalar fields. Φ1 Φ1 FIG. 11. A detail of Fig. 10. where the dimension is dB = 1.54 ± 0.02. 23 Φ2 FIG. 12. (a) A tra jectory spiraling into the de Sitter attractor. (b) A nearby tra jectory which flows out to the big crunch attractor. Φ2 a a FIG. 13. The basins of attraction in the a - a plane for universes containing a minimally coupled scalar field and a massless, conformally coupled scalar field. 24 a a FIG. 14. A detail of Fig. 13. where the dimension is dB = 1.484 ± 0.005. 25
astro-ph/0701139	1	0701	2007-01-05T13:47:23	Temperature fluctuations in H II regions: t2 for the two-phase model	[ "astro-ph" ]	Aims: We investigate temperature fluctuations in H II regions in terms of a two-phase model, which assumes that the nebular gas consists of a hot and a cold phase. Methods: We derive general formulae for T([O III), the [O III] forbidden line temperature, and T(H I), the hydrogen Balmer jump temperature, in terms of the temperatures of the hot and cold phases, T_h and T_c. Results: For large temperature differences, the values of t2 required to account for the observed difference between T([O III]) and T(H I) are much lower than those deduced using the classical formulae that assume random and small amplitude temperature fluctuations. One should therefore be cautious when using a two-phase model to account for empirically derived $t^2$ values. We present a correction of a recent work by Giammanco & Beckman, who use a two-phase model to estimate the ionization rate of H II regions by cosmicrays. We show that a very small amount of cold gas is sufficient to account for t2 values typically inferred for H II regions.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. 6564 October 22, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 Temperature fluctuations in H ii regions: t2 for the two-phase model Y. Zhang1,2, B. Ercolano3, and X.-W. Liu1 1 Department of Astronomy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China 3 Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 7 0 0 2 n a J 5 1 v 9 3 1 1 0 7 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Received; accepted ABSTRACT Aims. We investigate temperature fluctuations in H ii regions in terms of a two-phase model, which assumes that the nebular gas consists of a hot and a cold phase. Methods. We derive general formulae for T ([O iii]), the [O iii] forbidden line temperature, and T (H i), the hydrogen Balmer jump temperature, in terms of the temperatures of the hot and cold phases, Th and Tc. Results. For large temperature differences, the values of t2 required to account for the observed difference between T ([O iii]) and T (H i) are much lower than those deduced using the classical formulae that assume random and small amplitude temperature fluctu- ations. One should therefore be cautious when using a two-phase model to account for empirically derived t2 values. We present a correction of a recent work by Giammanco & Beckman, who use a two-phase model to estimate the ionization rate of H ii regions by cosmic rays. We show that a very small amount of cold gas is sufficient to account for t2 values typically inferred for H ii regions. Key words. ISM: general -- ISM: H ii regions 1. Introduction Temperature fluctuations in H ii regions are a much-discussed problem. Peimbert (1967) investigated for the first time the effects of such fluctuations on temperatures empirically derived from spectroscopic observations and found that they may lead to higher electron temperatures being derived from the collisionally excited [O iii] nebular-to-auroral forbidden-line ratio, T ([O iii]), than those derived from the Balmer jump of the H i recombination spectrum, T (H i). If significant temperature fluctuations exist in H ii regions and yet are ignored in the analysis, they may lead to underestimating ionic abundances calculated from collisionally excited lines (CELs) (e.g. Esteban et al. 2002). The parameter t2 (Peimbert 1967) was introduced to quantitatively characterize temperature fluctuations. Since then the parameter has been extensively used in nebular studies. Under the conditions that [T (r) − T0]2/T 2 0 ≪ 1, where T (r) is the local electron temperature and T0 the average value weighted by the square of density. The value of t2 can be determined either by comparing T ([O iii]) and T (H i) or by comparing ionic abundances derived from CELs and from recombination lines (RLs) (see Peimbert et al. 2004, for further details). Two-phase models, which approximate a nebula by two components of different physical conditions, represent an over- simplified, yet frequently used method of studying nebular physics (e.g. Viegas & Clegg 1994; Zhang et al. 2005). Using a two-phase model, Stasi´nska (2002 ) points out that the classical picture of temperature fluctuations may be misleading under certain conditions, and three parameters are needed to characterize temperature inhomogeneities. One of the open questions in the study of H ii regions is that values of t2 derived from observations are consistently higher than those predicted by photoionization models (Stasi´nska 2000). Recently, Giammanco & Beckman (2005; GB05 thereafter) constructed a two-temperature-phase model capable of explain- ing t2 values deduced for a number of H ii regions by means of incorporating a component of cool ionic gas ionized by cosmic rays. However, t2 values deduced from observations cannot be applied directly to two-phase models. This is because empirical values of t2 deduced from observations were calculated from formulae derived by assuming random and small-amplitude temperature fluctuations, assumptions that are apparently broken for a two-phase model. The purpose of the current work is to quantitatively study the relationship between the t2 values predicted by two-phase models and those measured by observations. We show that, in the case of a very cold ionic gas component embedded in a 'normal' H ii region, t2 deduced from observations using the empirical method may have significantly overestimated the real values. 2. Analysis According to Peimbert (1967), for a given ionic species of number density Ni, the thermal structure of an H ii region can be characterized by an average temperature T0 and a mean square temperature fluctuation parameter t2, defined as T0 = R TeNeNidV R NeNidV (1) Send offprint requests to: Y. Zhang 2 and Y. Zhang et al.: Temperature fluctuations in H ii regions: t2 for the two-phase model t2 = R (Te − T0)2NeNidV , T 2 0 R NeNidV respectively. Assuming t2 ≪ 1, T0 and t2 can be determined from measured T ([O iii]) and T (H i) using relations, T ([O iii]) = T0"1 + 2 9.13 × 104 − 3! t2# 1 T0 (2) (3) and T (H i) = T0(1 − 1.67t2) (Peimbert 1967; Garnett 1992). Esteban et al. (2002) report t2 values for a sample of H ii regions. Their values are reproduced in the first row of Table 1. Although they were obtained by comparing ionic abundances derived from CELs and from RLs, we assume that they are the same as would be deduced from from T ([O iii]) and T (H i) using Eqs. (3) and (4). The assumption is supported by studies of Torres-Peimbert & Peimbert (2003), who find general agreement between t2 values inferred from the differences between T ([O iii]) and T (H i) and those inferred from the apparent discrepancies between CEL and ORL abundances. Esteban et al. (2002) did not provide values of T0. For the purpose of comparison, we follow GB05 and assume that T0 = T ([O iii]), as given in the second row of Table 1. However, as pointed out previously by Stasi´nska (2002), the empirical method of estimating t2 using Eqs. (3) and (4) may be invalid under certain conditions. In the following, we show that in the two-phase model, values of t2 that are required to account for the measured differences between T ([O iii]) and T (H i) (or differences between ORL and CEL abundances) may be much lower than that derived from the empirical method. (4) In the framework of the two-phase model, which assumes that the electron temperature structure of an H ii region consists of a hot and a cold phase, we follow GB05 and assume equal densities of the two phases and an ionization fraction of unity for the hot gas. Electron temperatures are designated as Th and Tc for the hot and cold phases, respectively. The intensity of an [O iii] forbidden line transition of wavelength λ is given by I([O iii])λ ∼ Z N(O2+)NeT −1/2 e exp(−∆E/kTe)dV , where ∆E is the excitation energy of the upper level. It follows that I([O iii])4959,5007 I([O iii])4363 ≡ C × exp( 33000 T ([O iii])) e VhT −1/2 e VhT −1/2 N(O2+)hNh N(O2+)hNh = C × h h exp(−29200/Th) + N(O2+)cNc exp(−62200/Th) + N(O2+)cNc c e VcT −1/2 e VcT −1/2 c (5) (6) exp(−29200/Tc) exp(−62200/Tc) , where C is a constant depending only on atomic data, and super- or subscript 'h' and 'c' refer to quantities of the hot and cold phases, respectively. In the cold phase, the ionization fraction of oxygen is expected to be lower than that of hydrogen. As a reasonable approximation, we assume that N(O2+)c/N(O)c = 0.1N(H+)c/N(H)c. Our analysis is insensitive to this assumption since the cold phase essentially contributes no [O iii] forbidden line fluxes given its very low temperature and the fact that emissivities of forbidden lines decline exponentially with decreasing temperature (c.f Eq. 5). We thus obtain T ([O iii]) = 33000 ln−1 T −1/2 h T −1/2 h exp(−29200/Th) + 0.1θx2T −1/2 exp(−62200/Th) + 0.1θx2T −1/2 c c exp(−29200/Tc) exp(−62200/Tc) , (7) where, using the notation of GB05, θ is the mass ratio of the cold to hot gas, and x is the ionization fraction of hydrogen in the cold gas. It can be easily seen that for Th ≫ Tc, T ([O iii]) ∼ Th. Similarly, from the flux of the Balmer jump, I(Bal, 3646) ∼ Z N(H+)NeT −3/2 e dV , and the flux of Hβ, I(Hβ) ∼ Z N(H+)NeT −5/6 e dV , we have T −3/2 h T −5/6 h T (H i) =  + θx2T −3/2 + θx2T −5/6 c c , −3/2  (8) (9) (10) Y. Zhang et al.: Temperature fluctuations in H ii regions: t2 for the two-phase model 3 Fig. 1. t2 versus [T ([O iii]) − T (H i)], deduced from the empirical method [Eqs. (3) and (4), dotted lines] and for two-phase model [Eqs. (7), (10), (12), and (13), solid lines]. Left panels: θx2 = 0.01; Right panels: θx2 = 0.1; Upper panels: Th = 10000 K; Lower panels: Th = 15000 K. or θx2 = Th Tc!−3/2 T (H i)−2/3T 2/3 h − 1 1 − T (H i)−2/3T 2/3 . c Equation (10) shows that T (H i) weights towards Tc. Following GB05, for a two-phase model, we obtain T0 = Th + θx2Tc 1 + θx2 , t2 = θx2 Th − Tc Th + θx2Tc!2 , θx2 = (Th − T0)2 (T0 − Tc)2 = T 2 0 t2 (T0 − Tc)2 , and Th = T0 + T 2 0 t2 T0 − Tc . (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) Therefore, for the two-phase scenario, T0 and t2 should be determined from Eqs. (7), (10), (12), and (13) instead of from Eqs. (3) and (4). The latter are only valid for random and small amplitude fluctuations. In Fig. 1 for given values of θx2 and Th, we compare t2 as a function of T ([O iii]) − T (H i) derived from the empirical method using Eqs. (3) and (4), and that derived in the scenario of two-phase model using Eqs. (7), (10), and (13). The plots show that, depending on θx2 above a critical value of T ([O iii]) − T (H i), the empirical method significantly overestimates t2, particularly for the case of small θx2. The amount of deviation is insensitive to the value adopted for Th. In addition, we find that as the temperature difference between the two phases is larger than a critical value (typically ∼ 6000 K), empirical t2 deduced from observations can no longer be used at their face values to constrain two-phase models, a point overlooked by GB05 as discussed in the following section. 4 Y. Zhang et al.: Temperature fluctuations in H ii regions: t2 for the two-phase model Table 1. Estimated values of t2, T0, and θx2 for Tc = 100, 1000, and 4000 K for a sample of H ii regions. T0,E and t2 E are taken from Esteban et al. (2002). The numbers in parentheses are values derived by GB05 and included here for comparison. E,T0,E) E,T0,E) Object t2 E T0,E T ([O iii])(t2 T (H i)(t2 (t2)100 (t2)1000 (t2)4000 (T0)100 (T0)1000 (T0)4000 (θx2)100 (θx2)1000 (θx2)4000 NGC 604 NGC 5461 NGC 5471 NGC 2363 0.027 8150 9052 7783 0.00013 0.00413 0.02511 9051 9011 8518 0.041 8600 9943 8011 0.00016 0.00053 0.03503 9941 9884 9370 0.074 14100 15913 12358 0.00009 0.00312 0.02401 15911 15860 15413 0.128 15700 18528 12344 0.00013 0.00429 0.03540 18526 18445 17719 0.00013(0.028) 0.00522(0.035) 0.08690(0.10) 0.00017(0.042) 0.00659(0.052) 0.10664(0.14) 0.00010(0.075) 0.00356(0.086) 0.04378(0.14) 0.00013(0.130) 0.00480(0.146) 0.05905(0.23) 3. New estimates of θx2 for GB05 model GB05 showed that the ionization of cold neutral gas by cosmic rays may significantly contribute to temperature fluctuations. They used a two-phase model to explain t2 values obtained by Esteban et al. (2002) for a number of H ii regions. However, the high temperature difference between the two phases in GB05 model (see their Table 1) suggests that t2 values obtained by Esteban et al. cannot be applied directly to two-phase models. Values of θx2 derived by GB05 need to be re-considered. We re-estimate θx2 values for the sample of H ii regions of Esteban et al. (2002). Following GB05, three values of Tc are assumed, 100, 1000, and 4000 K. Under these conditions, temperature in the cold gas is too low to collisionally excite the [O iii] lines, and consequently Eq. (7) can be simplified to T ([O iii]) = Th . (16) Substituting values of T0 and t2 given by Esteban et al. (2002) [hereafter referred as T0,E and t2 E, in order to distinguish them from those deduced from Eqs. (12) and (13)] into Eqs. (3) and (4), we obtain T ([O iii])(t2 E,T0,E), which are tabulated in Rows 3 and 4 of Table 1. Note that here we take the same assumption by GB05 that T0,E = T ([O iii]). Then θx2 can be determined from Eq. (11), where T (H i) = T (H i)(t2 E,T0,E) thus obtained are slightly higher than the actual values deduced from observations (see Table 1), the resulting θx2 are hardly affected. E, T0,E). Although the values of T ([O iii])(t2 E, T0,E), Th = T ([O iii])(t2 E,T0,E) and T (H i)(t2 In Table 1 we compare our θx2 values to those of GB05 (given in parentheses); for low values of θx2 differences of up to a factor of a hundred are found. It can easily be seen that the discrepancies increase with decreasing temperature of the cold gas, as suggested by Fig. 1. For Tc = 100 K, our derived values of θx2 are very low, suggesting that the values of t2 reported by Esteban et al. (2002) can be explained by the existence of a very small amount of cold gas. Table 1 also gives t2 and T0 values derived from the Eqs. (12) and (13). As the Table shows, the real t2 values are lower when Tc ≪ T0 than those derived from the empirical method. As a result, values of the cosmic ray ionization rate, ζ, derived by GB05 have been grossly overestimated [c.f. their Eq. (17)]. Our conclusion is consistent with the range of values inferred for the Orion nebula from Gamma ray observations. 4. Conclusion We have studied the relationship between values of t2 predicted by a two-phase model and those derived empirically from observa- tions (empirical method). Our results show that the existence of extremely cold gas within H ii regions may lead to overestimated t2 calculated from empirically determined T ([O iii]) and T (H i). We stress that care should be taken when using the two-phase model to study large temperature fluctuations of H ii regions. In this model, CELs are hardly produced by the cold gas, which on the other hand makes a large contribution to the flux at the Balmer jump, due to the T −3/2 dependence of I(Bal, 3646). Accordingly, the existence of a very small amount of cold material may lead to a large discrepancy between T ([O iii]) and T (H i). In other words, in spite of its small mass, the existence of extremely cold material can reproduce apparently large t2 (as derived from the empirical method), much larger than the actual value [as defined by Eq. (2)]. Finally, we revisited the GB05 study of cosmic ray ionization as a mechanism for creating temperature fluctuations in H ii regions. While this provides a potential mechanism for creating cold ionized plasma in H ii regions, we show that the values of ζ required to produce the ionization have been overestimated in their treatment, due to the t2 discrepancy discussed above. Based on the formulae presented here, we re-estimated their model parameters. The corrections are apparent, particularly in cases where temperature of the cold gas component is low, resulting in lower values of ζ that agree better with the estimates for the Orion nebula published in the literature. e Acknowledgements. We thank the referee, Dr. C. Morisset, for helpful comments that improved clarity of the paper. We would also like to thank Dr. Morisset for computing new values of t2 and T0, based on our estimates of θx2. Those values are now tabulated in Table 1. YZ and XWL acknowledge support by NSFC grant #10325312. Y. Zhang et al.: Temperature fluctuations in H ii regions: t2 for the two-phase model 5 References Esteban, C., Peimbert, M., Torres-Peimbert, S., & Rodr´ıguez, M. 2002, ApJ, 581, 241 Garnett, D. R. 1992, AJ, 103, 1330 Giammanco, C., & Beckman, J. E. 2005, A&A, 437, L11 (GB05) Peimbert, M. 1967, ApJ, 150, 825 Peimbert, M. , Peimbert, A., Ruiz, M. T., & Esteban, C. 2004, ApJ, 150, 431 Stasi´nska, G. 2000, RevMaxAA, 9, 158 Stasi´nska, G. 2002, RevMaxAA, 12, 62 Torres-Peimbert, S., & Peimbert, M. 2003, in IAU Symp. 209, Planetary Nebulae: Their Evolution and Role in the Universe, ed. P. R. Wood & M. Dopita (San Francisco: ASP), p363 Viegas, S. M., & Clegg, R. E. S. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 993 Zhang, Y., Liu, X.-W., Liu, Y., & Rubin, R. H. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 457
astro-ph/0308291	1	0308	2003-08-18T06:37:38	On the Quintessence with Abelian and Non-abelian Symmetry	[ "astro-ph", "hep-th" ]	We study the perturbations on both "radial" and "angular" components of the quintessence with an internal abelian and non-abelian symmetry. The properties of the perturbation on the "radial" component depend on the specific potential of the model and is similiar for both abelian and non-abelian case. We show that the consine-type potential is very interesting for the O(\textit{N}) quintessence model and also give a critical condition of instability for the potential. While the properties of perturbations on "angular" components depend on whether the internal symmetry is abelian or non-abelian, which we have discussed respectively. In the non-abelian case, the fluctuation of the "angular" component will increase rapidly with time while in the abelian case it will not.	astro-ph	astro-ph	On the Quintessence with Abelian and Non-abelian Symmetry Xin-zhou Li,∗ Jian-gang Hao, Dao-jun Liu, and Xiang-hua Zhai Shanghai United Center for Astrophysics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234 ,China (Dated: November 15, 2018) Abstract We study the perturbations on both "radial" and "angular" components of the quintessence with an internal abelian and non-abelian symmetry. The properties of the perturbation on the "radial" component depend on the specific potential of the model and is similiar for both abelian and non- abelian case. We show that the consine-type potential is very interesting for the O(N ) quintessence model and also give a critical condition of instability for the potential. While the properties of perturbations on "angular" components depend on whether the internal symmetry is abelian or non-abelian, which we have discussed respectively. In the non-abelian case, the fluctuation of the "angular" component will increase rapidly with time while in the abelian case it will not. 3 0 0 2 g u A 8 1 1 v 1 9 2 8 0 3 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 1. Introduction Recent observations[1, 2, 3] show that our Universe is flat and 73 percent of its total energy density is resulted from "dark energy", which has a negative pressure and can accelerate the expansion of the Universe[4, 5]. using recent announcement by the WMAP satellite[3], we still do not judge whether dark energy is due to an unchanging, uniform and inert "vacuum energy" (also known as a cosmological constant) or a dynamic cosmic field that changes with time and varies across space (known as quintessence). Quintessence can be considered as a spatially homogeneous scalar field that evolves with time and many models[6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11] have been constructed so far. The possibility of quintessence as rolling tachyon has also been investigated [12]. Boyle et al[13] and Gu and Hwang[14] have discussed quintessence with complex scalar field. In a previous paper [15], we have further generalized their ideas by replacing the complex scalar field with a N -plet scalar field which is spinning in a O(N )-symmetric po- tential. When one of the angular components is fixed, this O(N ) quintessence model will reduce to the O(N -1) quintessence model. If the N -2 angular components are fixed, O(N ) quintessence model can reduce to the complex scalar model mentioned above. If all angular components are fixed, O(N ) quintessence model will reduce to the quintessence. It is worth noting that this generalization does not hold its importance for the widely studied tracker-type potentials because the amplitude of the scalar field will increase steadily and make the angular contribution negligible. But for another type widely investigated potential, the cosine-type potential[9, 15], it will be very interesting. It has been pointed out that a natural introduction of quintessence is an ultralight axion with an almost massless quark[9] and the cosine-type potential can be derived from such a model. Furthermore, This potential requires that the amplitude of the field should not goes to be very large and therefore, unlike the tracker-type potential, make the angular contribution significant. It would be very interesting to study the behaviours of the field when it is perturbed. We firstly investigate the fluctuation of the "radial" component and find that its stability depends on the specific potential of the model while has nothing to do with whether the the internal symmetry is abelian and non-abelian. We give a critical condition of the insta- bility for the "radial" perturbation, under which the "radial" fluctuation will grow rapidly with time. Fortunately, we find that this condition is not satisfed by most potentials for quintessence models. While the fluctuation of the "angular" components depend heavily 2 on whether the internal symmetry is abelian or non-abelian. In the abelian case (N = 2), the "angular" fluctuation will always damp, but in the non-abelian case(N > 2), there are possibilities for the "angular" perturbations to grow rapidly with time and become strongly space-dependent. It is worth noting that when we take the metric fluctuations(which are generally small compared with the fluctuations of the quintessence field) into account, the above conclusions are still held. In order to make the discussion more clear, in this paper we will restrict ourselves to the N = 2 and N = 3 cases which represent the abelian and nonabelian symmetry respectively. 2. The Model We start from the flat Robertson-Walker metric ds2 = dt2 − a2(t)(dx2 + dy2 + dz2) The Lagrangian density for the quintessence with O(3) symmetry is LΦ = 1 2 gµν(∂µΦa)(∂νΦa) − V (Φa) (0.1) (0.2) where Φa is the component of the scalar field, a = 1, 2, 3. To make it possess a O(3) symmetry, we write it in the following form Φ1 = R(t) cos ϕ1(t) Φ2 = R(t) sin ϕ1(t) cos ϕ2(t) Φ3 = R(t) sin ϕ1(t) sin ϕ2(t) (0.3) Therefore, we have Φa = R and assume that the potential of the O(3) quintessence depends only on R. It is clear that when we set the component ϕ2 to zero, the above O(3) system will reduce to the O(2) abelian case. The Einstein equations and equations of motion for the scalar fields can be written as H 2 = ( a a )2 = 8πG 3 [ 1 2 ( R2 + Ω2 a6R2 ) + V (R)] ( a a ) = − 8πG 3 [ R2 + Ω2 a6R2 − V (R)] 3 (0.4) (0.5) R + 3H R − Ω2 a6R3 + ∂V (R) ∂R = 0 ϕ1 + (3H + 2 R R ) ϕ1 − sin ϕ1 cos ϕ1 ϕ2 2 = 0 ϕ2 + (3H + 2 R R ) ϕ2 + 2 cot ϕ1 ϕ1 ϕ2 = 0 (0.6) (0.7) (0.8) where H is Hubble parameter and the term Ω2 a6R2 comes from the first integrals of the equations of motion for the angular components(detailed discussion see[15]). 3. General Equations of Motion for "Radial" and "Angular" Perturbation In order to eliminate the ambiguity from gauge freedom, one has to identify gauge in- variant quantities or choose a given gauge and perform the calculations of perturbation in that gauge. In this paper, we will carry out our investigation in synchronous gauge just as Ratra and Peebles have done in Ref.[4]. As we shall see, in synchronous gauge the evolution of the modes that we consider here depend on the gravitational field only through a gauge invariant quantity h 2 , so we can consider a single perturbation mode conveniently in the following sections. The line element of perturbed metric of a spatially flat FRW spacetime is taken as ds2 = dt2 − a2(t)(δij − hij)dxidxj (0.9) where hij are the metric fluctuations and hij << 1. For simplicity, we write the first-order equations of perturbations for the N = 3 case. Decomposing the components of the field as follow R(t, x) = R(t) + δR(t, x) ϕ1(t, x) = ϕ1(t) + δϕ1(t, x) ϕ2(t, x) = ϕ2(t) + δϕ2(t, x) (0.10) (0.11) (0.12) We can obtain the equations of motion for the fluctuations as 4 (δR) − 1 a2 ∇2(δR) − [ ϕ1 2 + sin2 ϕ1](δR) + 3 (δR) a a ′′ +V (R)(δR) − −R sin(2ϕ1) ϕ2 h R − 2 ϕ1R( δϕ1) 1 2 2(δϕ1) − 2R sin2(ϕ1) ϕ2( δϕ2) = 0 (0.13) (δϕ1) − 1 a a2 ∇2(δϕ1) + 3 a 1 h ϕ1 − sin(2ϕ1) ϕ2( δϕ2) 2 cos(2ϕ1)(δϕ1) − 2 (δϕ1) + 2 ( δϕ1) R R ϕ1( δR) − R ϕ1(δR) = 0 (0.14) − ϕ2 + 2 R 2 R2 (δϕ2) − 1 a2 ∇2(δϕ2) + 3 a a (δϕ2) + 2 R R ( δϕ2) − h ϕ2 1 2 +2 cot(ϕ1)[ ϕ1(δϕ2) + ϕ2( δϕ1)] − 2 csc2(ϕ1) ϕ1 ϕ2(δϕ1) + 2 R ϕ2( δR) − 2 R2 R ϕ2(δR) = 0 (0.15) h + 2H h = 2 R (δR) + 2R2 ϕ1(δ ϕ1) + 2R2 sin2(ϕ1) ϕ2( δϕ2) + 2 Ω2 a6R3 (δR) + R2 sin(2ϕ1) ϕ2 2(δϕ1) − V ′ (R)(δR) (0.16) h,i − hij,j = R∂i(δR) + R2 ϕ1∂i(δϕ1) + R2 sin2(ϕ1) ϕ2∂i(δϕ2) (0.17) 1 a2 (hij,kk + h,ij − hik,jk − hjk,ik) − 3H hij (R)(δR) −H hδij − hij = δijV ′ (0.18) where δR, δϕ1 and δϕ2 are fluctuations of the " radial" and "angular" components re- spectively. The above equations of motion for fluctuations are the most general case for 5 quintessence with O(3) internal symmetry. When we consider only the "radial" perturba- tion, we set ϕ1, ϕ2, δϕ1 and δϕ1 to zero. If we deal with the perturbation on the "angular" component in the abelian case, what we need to do is to set another "angular" component ϕ2 together with its fluctuation δϕ2 to zero. In the subsequent sections, we will discuss them respectively. 4. Perturbation on the "Radial" Components As we have pointed out in the introduction, the property of the perturbation on the "radial" component depend only on the potential of the model and is independent of whether the internal symmetry is abelian or non-abelian. In this section, we will show this in detail. As we all know that scalar fields with an internal symmetry are likely to produce Q balls or other non-topological solitons, which have been studied by many authors[16, 17, 18]. In their work, they generally put the gravitational effects aside because the magnitude of gravitational fluctuations induced by the fluctuations of the scalar fields are far smaller than the self-interaction of the scalar fields. Firstly, we, following the previous study in this field[16, 17, 18], also investigate the perturbation without considering the metric fluctuation. After this, we take the gravitational effects(metric fluctuations)into account and carry out a similar study on the fluctuations. The equations of motion for fluctuations of the "radial" component are (δR) + 3H (δR) − 1 a2 ∇2(δR) + Ω2 a6R4 (δR) (R)(δR) = 0 ′′ +V (0.19) which is obtained by setting δϕ1, δϕ2 and h in Eq.(0.13) to zero. If we choose for the fluctuation the following form: δR(t, x) = δR0 exp[α(t) + ikx] (0.20) then for nontrivial δR0 , we have α + α2 + 3H α − Ω2 a6R4 + k2 a2 + ∂2V ∂R2 = 0 (0.21) Following the authors in Ref.[16, 17], we assume that α(t) is a slow-varying function, i.e. α(t) << α2 and α ≈ Const. In the following sections, we shall always hold this assumption. Therefore, neglecting the α in the above equation, we have 6 α = 1 2(cid:20) − 3H ±r(3H)2 − 4( k2 a2 − Ω2 a6R4 + ∂2V ∂R2 )(cid:21) (0.22) If α is real and positive, the fluctuation will grow rapidly with time. Therefore the instability band for this fluctuation is From Eq.(0.23), one can find that the instability band depends on the specific potential of 0 < k2 < Ω2 a4R4 − a2∂2V ∂R2 (0.23) the quintessence. When considering the metric fluctuations, one can obtain the following equations of motion for the fluctuations (δR) + 3H (δR) − Ω2 a6R4 (δR) 1 h R = 0 2 1 a2 ∇2(δR) + (R)(δR) − +V ′′ h + 2H h = 2 R (δR) + 2 Ω2 a6R3 (δR) − V ′ (R)(δR) h,i − hij,j = R∂i(δR) 1 a2 (hij,kk + h,ij − hik,jk − hjk,ik) − 3H hij (R)(δR) −H hδij − hij = δijV ′ (0.24) (0.25) (0.26) (0.27) If we choose Ω = 0, i.e. in the case of N = 1 the Eqs.(0.24)-(0.27) will reduce to Ratra- Peebles's results in the absence of baryonic term[4]. Clearly, since the equations of motion for the metric and scalar fluctuations(Eq.(0.25) and Eq.(0.24)) are linear equations, the fluctuations could be taken as the following form δR(t, x) = δR0 exp[α(t) + ikx] (0.28) 7 h(t, x) = h0 exp[α(t) + ikx] (0.29) Since there are no ∇2h term in Eq.(0.25), h can not oscillate rapidly and in fact, h will not be able to react, in lowest order, to the rapidly oscillating source terms in Eq.(0.25)[4]. Then for nontrivial δR0 and h0, we have α2 +(cid:18)3H − 1 2 h0 δR0 R(cid:19) α − Ω2 a6R4 + k2 a2 + ∂2V ∂R2 = 0 So α = 1 2 h0 δR0 R) 1 2(cid:20) − (3H − ±s(3H − 1 2 h0 δR0 R)2 − 4( k2 a2 − Ω2 a6R4 + ∂2V ∂R2 )(cid:21) (0.30) (0.31) From Eq.(0.31), it is clear that the instability band is the same as that when we did not consider the metric fluctuations. This is reasonable in physics because the metric fluctuations induced by the fluctuations of the field are far smaller than the fluctuations of the field and its back-reaction to the field would be even smaller and thus negligible. So, when considering the metric fluctuations, there should not be a substantial change on the properties of the fluctuation of the quintessence field. 5. Perturbation on the "Angular" Components in the Abelian Case In this section, we investigate the perturbation on "angular" component in the abelian case, that is, the case in which the quintessence fields possess a O(2) internal symmetry. By setting δR, h, δϕ2 and ϕ2 in Eq.(0.14) to zero, we can obtain the equation of motion for the fluctuation of "angular" component up to the first order as: δϕ1 + (3H + 2 R R ) δϕ1 − 1 a2 ∇2δϕ1 = 0 where δϕ1 is the fluctuation of the "angular" component. If we choose δϕ1(t, x) = δφ10 exp[α(t) + ikx] then for nontrivial δϕ10, from Eq.(0.32) we have α2 + (3H + 2 R R ) α + k2 a2 = 0 8 (0.32) (0.33) (0.34) α = 1 2(cid:20) − (3H + 2 ) ±s(3H + 2 R R R R )2 − 4 k2 a2(cid:21) (0.35) It is clear that From Eq.(0.35), α is always negative and thus the fluctuation will damp quickly. That is, the angular perturbation will not produce a significant "angular" inhomogeneity and the global symmetry will not likely to become space-dependent. In the following, we will introduce the metric fluctuations into our analysis. By a similar procedure as that in last section, we can obtain the equations of motion for the fluctuations of metric and "angular" component up to the first order as following: h + H h = R2 ϕ1 δϕ1 1 2 h,i − hij,j = R2 ϕ1∂i(δϕ1) 1 a2 (hij,kk + h,ij − hik,jk − hjk,ik) − 3H hij −H hδij − hij = 0 δϕ1 + (3H + 2 R R ) δϕ1 − 1 a2 ∇2δϕ1 − 1 2 h ϕ1 = 0 (0.36) (0.37) (0.38) (0.39) Since Eq.(0.36)and Eq.(0.39) are linear equations, the fluctuations could be chosen in the following form δϕ1(t, x) = δϕ10 exp[α(t) + ikx] h(t, x) = h0 exp[α(t) + ikx] Then for nontrivial δϕ10, we have (from Eq.(0.39)) α2 + (3H + 2 R R − 1 2 h0 δϕ10 ϕ1) α + k2 a2 = 0 9 (0.40) (0.41) (0.42) Therefore, one can obtain α = 1 R R − 1 2 h0 δϕ10 ϕ1) (0.43) 2(cid:20) − (3H + 2 ±s(3H + 2 R R − 1 2 h0 δϕ10 ϕ1)2 − 4 k2 a2(cid:21) From Eq.(0.43), it is clear that α will always be negative even if the metric fluctuations are considered. 6. Perturbation on the "Angular" Components in the Non-abelian Case In this section, we generalize the discussions in last section to the case in which the internal symmetry is non-abelian, that is the symmetry group is O(3). We restrict ourselves to the case that only one "angular" component is perturbed. This will not lose its generality but greatly facilitate the discussion because we can always choose a coordinate system in which the perturbation appears in one angular direction. By setting δR, δϕ2 and h in Eq.(0.14) to zero, we can obtain the equation of motion for the angular fluctuation up to the first order as following: δϕ1 + (3H + 2 R R ) δϕ1 − 1 a2 ∇2δϕ1 − cos 2ϕ1 ϕ2 2δϕ1 = 0 (0.44) where ϕ1 and ϕ2 are the homogeneous parts of the "angular" components. If we choose for δϕ1 the same form as in Eq.(0.40), then for nontrivial δϕ10, from Eq.(0.44)we have α2 + (3H + 2 R R ) α + k2 a2 − cos 2ϕ1 ϕ2 2 = 0 It is clear that α = 1 2(cid:20) − (3H + 2 R R ) ±s(3H + 2 R R )2 − 4(cid:18) k2 a2 − cos 2ϕ1 ϕ2 2(cid:19)(cid:21) From Eq.(0.46), one can find that α could be positive if k2 a2 − cos 2ϕ1 ϕ2 2 < 0 (0.45) (0.46) (0.47) That is, under the above condition(Eq.(0.47)) the "angular" inhomogeneity might grow rapidly with time and make the symmetry group become space-dependent. 10 When taking into account the metric fluctuation and following a similar process as that in section 5, we can obtain the equations of motion for the fluctuations of "angular" component as follow δϕ1 + (3H + 2 R R ) δϕ1 − 1 a2 ∇2δϕ1 1 2δϕ1 − 2 − cos 2ϕ1 ϕ2 h ϕ1 = 0 (0.48) The equations of motion for metric fluctuations are h + 2H h = 2R2 ϕ1(δ ϕ1) + R2 sin(2ϕ1) ϕ2 2(δϕ1) (0.49) h,i − hij,j = R2 ϕ1∂i(δϕ1) 1 a2 (hij,kk + h,ij − hik,jk − hjk,ik) − 3H hij −H hδij − hij = 0 (0.50) (0.51) Similarly, we choose the fluctuations to be the form of Eq.(0.40) and Eq.(0.41) and for nontrivial δϕ10, from Eq.(0.48) we have α2 + (3H + 2 R R − 1 2 h0 δϕ10 ϕ1) α − cos 2ϕ1 ϕ2 2 + k2 a2 = 0 and therefore α = 1 2(cid:20) − (3H + 2 R R − 1 2 h0 δϕ10 ϕ1) ± s(3H + 2 R R − 1 2 h0 δϕ10 ϕ1)2 − 4(cid:18) k2 a2 − cos 2ϕ1 ϕ2 2(cid:19)(cid:21) (0.52) (0.53) From Eq.(0.53), one can easily identify that the condition for positive α is the same as that in Eq.(0.47). This shows that in the O(3) case, the instability condition for the "angular" fluctuations won't be changed when considering the metric fluctuation, just as that we have proved in the O(2) case. 11 7. Conclusion And Discussion In this paper, we investigate the perturbation on both "radial" and "angular" components of the quintessence fields with an internal abelian and non-abelian symmetry. We find that the fluctuation of the "radial" component depends on the specific potential of the quintessence model. Under certain condition, this fluctuation could grow rapidly and thus make the "radial" component space-dependent. For the "angular" perturbation, we find that the properties of the fluctuations depend on whether the internal symmetry group is abelian or non-abelian. In the abelian case, the fluctuation of the "angular" component will damp rapidly with time and therefore the symmetry group will not become space-dependent. In the case that the internal symmetry is non-abelian, we find that under certain condition, the "angular" inhomogeneities might increase rapidly with time and make the symmetry group space-dependent, or local. Here we briefly interpret the physical meaning of this instability: δϕ1 represents a small internal angular inhomogenity; This inhomogenity will increase rapidly under the condition(Eq.(0.47)). Note that this angular inhomogenity is not that of space-time. It is surely interesting to study the quintessence with a "local" internal symmetry, which we will investigate in a preparing work. When taking into account the metric fluctuations induced by the fluctuations of the quintessence field and assuming that the back-reaction of the metric fluctuations on the quintessence field are negligible as shown in Ref.[4], the above conclusion still hold true. It is worth noting that we choose the non-abelian symmetry group as O(3) in this paper. It is not difficult to generalize the O(3) case to O(N ) case and one may find that in the O(N ) case, the above conclusion for the non-abelian symmetry group still hold true even if the specific condition under which the inhomogeneity increase will change. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was partially supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 19875016, and Foundation of Shanghai Development for Science and Technology No. 01JC14035. [1] P. de Bernardis et al., Nature 404, 955 (2000);S. Hanany et al. Astrophys. J. 545, 1 (2000). 12 [2] N. Bahcall, J. P. Ostriker, S. Perlmutter and P. J. Steinhardt, Science 284, 1481 (1999);S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999); A. G. Riess et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998), astro-ph/9805201. [3] C. L. Bennett et al., [astro=ph/0302207]; D. N. Spergel et al., [astro-ph/0302209]; G. Hinshaw et al.,[astro-ph/0302217]. [4] B. Ratra and P. J. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988). [5] R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1582 (1998). [6] P. J. Steinhardt, L . Wang and I . Zlatev, Phys. Rev. D59, 123504 (1999), astro-ph/9812313. [7] I. Zlatev, L. Wang and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82,896 (1999), astro-ph/9807002. [8] K. Coble, S. Dodelson, J. Frieman, Phys. Rev. D55, 1851 (1997). [9] J. E. Kim, JHEP 9905, 022 (1999);Y. Nomura, T. Watari and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B484, 103(2000); Phys. Rev. D61, 105007 (2000). [10] T. Chiba, Phys. Rev. D64, 103503 (2001). [11] A. Masiero, M. Pietroni and F. Rosati, Phys. Rev. D61, 023504 (2000); T. Barreiro, E. J. Copeland and N. J. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D61, 127301 (2000); E. J. Copeland, N. J. Nunes and F. Rosati, Phys. Rev. D62, 123503 (2000). [12] X. Z. Li, J. G. Hao and D. J. Liu, Chin. Phys. Lett. 19, 1584(2002); J. G. Hao and X. Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D66, 087301(2002); J. S. Bagla, H. K. Jassal and T. Padmanabhan,[astro-ph/0212198]; T. Padmanabhan, [hep-th/0212290]; X. Z. Li and X. H. Zhai, Phys. Rev. D67 067501(2002). [13] L. A. Boyle, R. R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Lett. B545, 17(2002). [14] Je-An Gu and W-Y. P. Hwang, Phys. Lett. B517, 1 (2001). [15] X. Z. Li, J. G. Hao and D. J. Liu, Class. Quantum Grav. 19, 6049(2002); X. Z. Li, D. J. Liu and J. G. Hao, Chin. Phys. Lett. 19, 295(2002); X. Z. Li and J. G. Hao,[hep-th/0303093]. [16] A. Kusenko, M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B418, 46 (1998); S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Rev. D61, 041301 (2000); Phys. Rev. D62, 023510 (2000). [17] S. Kasuya, Phys. Lett. B515, 121 (2001), astro-ph/0105408; X. Z. Li and X. H. Zhai, Phys. Lett. B364, 212 (1995); X. Z. Li, X. H. Zhai and G. Chen, Astropart. Phys. 13, 245 (2000): X. Z. Li, J. G. Hao, D. J. Liu and G. Chen , J. Phys. A34, 1459 (2001); X. Z. Li and J. G. Hao, Phys. Rev. D66, 107701(2002); J. G. Hao and X. Z. Li, Class. Quantum Grav. 20, 1703 (2003). 13 [18] S. Coleman, Nucl. Phys. 262, 263 (1985). 14
astro-ph/0206018	1	0206	2002-06-03T05:01:11	Chandra Snapshot Observations of LINERs with a Compact Radio Core	[ "astro-ph" ]	The results of Chandra snapshot observations of 11 LINERs (Low-Ionization Nuclear Emission-line Regions), three low-luminosity Seyfert galaxies, and one HII-LINER transition object are presented. Our sample consists of all the objects with a flat or inverted spectrum compact radio core in the VLA survey of 48 low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN) by Nagar et al. (2000). An X-ray nucleus is detected in all galaxies except one and their X-ray luminosities are in the range 5x10^38 to 8x10^41 ergs s^-1. The X-ray to Halpha luminosity ratios for 11 out of 14 objects are in good agreement with the value characteristic of LLAGNs and more luminous AGNs, and indicate that their optical emission lines are predominantly powered by a LLAGN. For three objects, this ratio is less than expected. Comparing with multi-wavelength results, we find that these three galaxies are most likely to be heavily obscured AGN. We compare the radio to X-ray luminosity ratio of LLAGNs with those of more-luminous AGNs, and confirm the suggestion that a large fraction of LLAGNs are radio loud.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Proceedings of the Workshop: "X-ray spectroscopy of AGN with Chandra and XMM-Newton" held in Garching, December 3-6, 2001 eds. Th. Boller, S. Komossa, S. Kahn, H. Kunieda, MPE Report, pp. 2 0 0 2 n u J 3 1 v 8 1 0 6 0 2 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a Chandra Snapshot Observations of LINERs with a Compact Radio Core Y. Terashima1,2 and A.S. Wilson2,3 1 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan 2 Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 3 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Abstract. The results of Chandra snapshot observations of 11 LINERs (Low-Ionization Nuclear Emission-line Re- gions), three low-luminosity Seyfert galaxies, and one HII- LINER transition object are presented. Our sample con- sists of all the objects with a flat or inverted spectrum compact radio core in the VLA survey of 48 low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN) by Nagar et al. (2000). An X-ray nucleus is detected in all galaxies except one and their X-ray lu- minosities are in the range 5 × 1038 to 8 × 1041 ergs s−1. The X-ray to Hα luminosity ratios for 11 out of 14 ob- jects are in good agreement with the value characteristic of LLAGNs and more luminous AGNs, and indicate that their optical emission lines are predominantly powered by a LLAGN. For three objects, this ratio is less than ex- pected. Comparing with multi-wavelength results, we find that these three galaxies are most likely to be heavily ob- scured AGN. We compare the radio to X-ray luminosity ratio of LLAGNs with those of more-luminous AGNs, and confirm the suggestion that a large fraction of LLAGNs are radio loud. paucity of obscured AGN in LINERs may indicate that LINER 2s are not simply a low-luminosity extension of luminous Seyfert 2s, which often show heavy obscuration with a column density averaging NH ∼ 1023 cm−2 (e.g., Turner et al. 1997). Alternatively, biases against finding heavily obscured LLAGNs may be important. For exam- ple, objects selected through optical emission lines or X- ray fluxes are probably biased in favor of less absorbed ones, even if one uses the X-ray band above 2 keV. In contrast, radio observations, particularly at high fre- quency, are much less affected by absorption. Nagar et al. (2002) have reported a VLA 2 cm radio survey of all 96 LLAGNs within a distance of 19 Mpc. These LLAGNs come from the Palomar spectroscopic survey of bright galaxies (Ho et al. 1997a). As a pilot study of the X-ray properties of LLAGNs, we report here a Chandra survey of a subset, comprising 14 galaxies, of Nagar et al's (2002) sample. We have detected 13 of the galactic nuclei with Chandra. We also examine the "radio loudness" of our sample and compare it with other classes of AGN. 1. Introduction Low-Ionization nuclear emission-line regions (LINERs) are found in many nearby bright galaxies (e.g., Ho, Fil- ippenko, & Sargent 1997a). Extensive studies in various wavelengths have shown that type 1 LINERs (LINER 1s, i.e., those galaxies having broad Hα and possibly other broad Balmer lines in their nuclear optical spectra) are powered by a low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN) with a bolo- metric luminosity less than ∼ 1042 ergs s−1 (Ho et al. 2001; Terashima, Ho, & Ptak 2000a; Ho et al. 1997b). On the other hand, the energy source of LINER 2s is likely to be heterogeneous. Some LINER 2s show clear signatures of the presence of an AGN, while others are most proba- bly powered by stellar processes, and the luminosity ratio LX/LHα can be used to discriminate between these power sources (e.g., Terashima et al. 2000b). It is interesting to note that currently there are only a few LINER 2s known to host an obscured AGN (e.g., Turner et al. 2001). This 2. The Sample and Observations Our sample is based on the 15 GHz VLA observations by Nagar et al. (2000). Their sample of 48 objects consists of 22 LINERs, 18 transition objects between LINERs and HII nuclei, and eight low-luminosity Seyferts selected from the optical spectroscopic survey of Ho et al. (1997a). We selected 14 objects showing a flat to inverted spec- trum radio core (α ≥ −0.3, Sν ∝ να) according to Nagar et al.'s (2000) comparison with longer wavelength radio data published in literature. The targets are summarized in Table 1. The sample consists of seven LINER 1s, three LINER 2s, two Seyfert 1s, one Seyfert 2, and one tran- sition 2 object. 12 out of these 14 objects have been ob- served with the VLBA and high brightness temperature (Tb > 107 K) radio cores were detected in all of them (Fal- cke et al. 2000; Ulvestad & Ho 2001; Nagar et al. 2002). The exposure time was typically two ksec each. All the objects were observed with the ACIS-S3 back-illuminated CCD chip. Eight objects were observed in 1/8 sub-frame mode (frame time 0.4 s) to minimize effects of pileup. 1/2 2 Y. Terashima & A.S. Wilson: Chandra Snapshot Observations of LINERs with a Compact Radio Core Table 1. The Sample. Class Name NGC 266, 2787, 3226, 4143, 4203, 4278, 4579 LINER 1 NGC 3169, 4548, 6500 LINER 2 NGC 4565, 5033 Seyfert 1 Seyfert 2 NGC 3147 Transition 2 NGC 5866 sub-frame modes were used for three objects. Detailed re- sults are given in Terashima & Wilson (2002c). 3. Results An X-ray nucleus is seen in all the galaxies except for NGC 5866. The X-ray luminosities corrected for absorption are in the range 5 × 1038 to 8 × 1041 ergs s−1. The positions of the X-ray nuclei coincide with the radio core positions to within the positional accuracy of Chandra. Spectral fits were performed for relatively bright ob- jects. The pileup effect for the three objects with the largest count rate per frame (NGC 4203, NGC 4579, and NGC 5033) is serious and we did not attempt detailed spectral fits. Instead, we use the spectra and fluxes mea- sured with ASCA for these three objects (Terashima et al. 2002b and references therein) in the following discussions. We confirmed that the nuclear X-ray source dominates the hard X-ray emission within the beam size of ASCA. A power-law model modified by absorption was applied and acceptable fits were obtained in all cases. The photon indices of the nuclear sources are generally consistent with the typical values observed in LLAGNs (photon index Γ = 1.6 − 2.0, e.g., Terashima et al. 2002a, 2002b), although errors are quite large due to the limited photon statistics. The two objects (LINER 2s NGC 3169 and NGC 4548) show large absorption column density NH=1.1×1023 cm−2 and 1.6 × 1022 cm−2 , respectively, while NGC 3226 is less absorbed (NH=9.3 × 1021 cm−2). Others have small column densities which are consistent with 'type 1' AGNs. NGC 2787 has only 8 detected photons in the 0.5 -- 8 keV band and is too faint to obtain spectral information. Seyferts, and QSOs presented in Terashima et al. (2000a) and Ho et al. (2001). This indicates that their optical emis- sion lines are predominantly powered by a LLAGN. The three objects NGC 2787, NGC 5866, and NGC 6500, however, have much lower LX/LHα ratios (log < ∼ 0) than expected from the correlation, and LX/LHα their X-ray luminosities are not enough to power the Hα luminosities. This X-ray faintness could indicate one or more of several possibilities such as (1) an AGN is the power source, but is heavily absorbed at energies above 2 keV, (2) an AGN is the power source, but is currently switched-off or in a faint state, and (3) the optical narrow emission lines are powered by some other source(s) than an AGN. If an AGN is present in these X-ray faint objects and absorbed in the hard energy band above 2 keV, only scat- tered and/or highly absorbed X-rays can be observed, and then the intrinsic luminosity would be much higher than that observed. This can account for the low LX/LHα ratios and high radio to X-ray luminosity ratios (νLν(5 GHz)/LX). If the intrinsic X-ray luminosities are about one or two orders of magnitude higher than those ob- served, as is often inferred for Seyfert 2 galaxies, LX/LHα and νLν(5 GHz)/LX become typical of LLAGNs. Additional lines of evidence which support the pres- ence of an AGN include the fact that all three of these galaxies (NGC 2787, NGC 5866, and NGC 6500) have VLBI-detected, sub-pc scale, nuclear radio core sources (Falcke et al. 2000), a broad Hα component (in NGC 2787, and an ambiguous detection in NGC 5866; Ho et al. 1997b), a variable radio core in NGC 2787, and a jet-like linear structure in a high-resolution radio map at 5 GHz with the VLBA (NGC 6500; Falcke et al. 2000). Only an upper limit to the X-ray flux is obtained for NGC 5866. If an X-ray nucleus is present in this galaxy and its lumi- nosity is only slightly below the upper limit, this source could be an AGN obscured by a column density NH∼ 1023 cm−2 or larger. If the intrinsic luminosity of the nucleus is much lower than the observed upper limit, an AGN would have to be almost completely obscured and/or the optical emission lines powered by some other source(s). The opti- cal classification (transition object) suggests the presence of an ionizing source other than an AGN. 4. Discussion 4.1. Power Source of LINERs 4.2. Obscured LLAGNs We test whether the detected X-ray sources are the power source of their optical emission lines by examining the lu- minosity ratio LX/LHα. The Hα luminosities (LHα) were taken from Ho et al. (1997a) and corrected for the redden- ing estimated from the Balmer decrement for the narrow lines. The X-ray luminosities (LX) in the 2 − 10 keV band, and corrected for absorption, were used. The resulting LX/LHα ratios of most objects are in the range of AGNs > ∼ 1) and in good agreement with the strong (log LX/LHα correlation between LX and LHα for LLAGNs, luminous In our sample, we found at least two highly absorbed LLAGNs (NGC 3169 and NGC 4548). In addition, if the X-ray faint objects discussed in the previous subsec- tion are indeed AGNs, they are most probably highly absorbed with NH> 1023 cm−2. Among these absorbed objects, NGC 2787 is classified as a LINER 1.9, NGC 3169, NGC 4548, and NGC 6500 as LINER 2s, and NGC 5866 as a transition 2 object. Thus, heavily absorbed LINER 1.9s/2s, of which few are known, are found in the present observations demonstrating that radio selection is Y. Terashima & A.S. Wilson: Chandra Snapshot Observations of LINERs with a Compact Radio Core 3 show high absorption columns in their X-ray spectra. In this subsection, we study radio loudness by comparing ra- dio and hard X-ray luminosities. Since the unabsorbed ∼ 1023 cm−2 (equivalent > luminosity for objects with NH > ∼ 50 mag for a normal gas to dust ratio) can be to AV reliably measured in the 2 -- 10 keV band, it is clear that re- placement of optical by hard X-ray luminosity potentially yields considerable advantages. In the following analysis, radio data at 5 GHz taken from the literature are used since fluxes at this frequency are widely available for various classes of objects. We used the radio luminosities primarily obtained with the VLA at < ∼ 1′′ resolution for the present sample. High resolution VLA data at 5 GHz are not available for several objects. For four objects among such cases, VLBA observations at 5 GHz with 150 mas resolution are published in the lit- erature (Falcke et al. 2000) and are used here. For two objects, we estimated 5 GHz fluxes from 15 GHz data by assuming a spectral slope of α = 0 (cf. Nagar et al. 2001). Since our sample is selected based on the presence of a compact radio core, the sample could be biased to more radio loud objects. Therefore, we constructed a larger sam- ple by adding objects taken from the literature for which 5 GHz radio, 2 -- 10 keV X-ray, and RO measurements are available. First, we introduce the ratio RX = νLν(5 GHz)/LX as a measure of radio loudness and compare the ratio with the conventional RO parameter. The X-ray luminosity LX in the 2 -- 10 keV band (source rest frame), corrected for absorption, is used. We examine the behavior of RX using samples of AGN over a wide range of luminosity, including LLAGN, the Seyfert sample of Ho & Peng (2001) and PG quasars which are also used in their analysis. The X-ray luminosities (mostly measured with ASCA) are compiled from the literature. Fig. 2 compares the parameters RO and RX for the Seyferts and PG sample. These two parameters correlate well for most Seyferts. Some Seyferts have higher RO val- ues than indicated by most Seyferts. This could be a result of extinction. Seyferts showing X-ray spectra absorbed by a column greater than 1022 cm−2 (NGC 2639, 4151, 4258, 4388, 4395, 5252, and 5674) are shown as open circles in Fig. 2. At least four of them have larger RO than indi- cated by the correlation. The correlation between log RO and log RX for the less absorbed Seyferts can be described as log RO = 0.88 log RX + 5.0. According to this relation, the boundary between radio loud and radio quiet object (log RO = 1) corresponds to log RX = −4.5. The PG quasars show systematically lower RO values than those of Seyferts at a given log RX. For the former objects, log RO = 1 corresponds to log RX = −3.5. This apparently reflects a luminosity dependence of the shape of the SED: luminous objects have steeper optical-X-ray slopes αox = 1.4 − 1.7 (S ∝ ν−α), where αox is often measured as the spectral index between 2200 A and 2 keV, while less luminous AGNs have αox = 1.0 − 1.2 (Ho Fig. 1. Examples of Chandra spectra. (a) NGC 3169 and (b) NGC 4548 a valuable technique for finding obscured AGNs. Along with heavily obscured LLAGNs known in low-luminosity Seyfert 2s (e.g., NGC 2273, NGC 2655, NGC 3079, NGC 4941, and NGC 5194; Terashima et al. 2002a), our obser- vations show that at least some type 2 LLAGNs are sim- ply low-luminosity counterparts of luminous Seyferts in which heavy absorption is often observed. Some LINER 2s (e.g., NGC 4594, Terashima et al. 2002a; NGC 4374, Finoguenov & Jones 2001; NGC 4486, Wilson & Yang 2002) and low-luminosity Seyfert 2s (NGC 3147) show no strong absorption. Therefore, the orientation dependent unification scheme does not always apply to AGNs in the low-luminosity regime. 4.3. Radio Loudness of LLAGNs Earlier studies have suggested that LLAGNs tend to be radio loud compared to more luminous AGNs based on the spectral energy distributions of seven LLAGNs (Ho 1999) and, for a larger sample, on the conventional definition of radio loudness RO = Lν(5 GHz)/Lν(B) (the subscript "O" stands for optical), with RO > 10 being radio loud (Ho & Peng 2001). Ho & Peng (2001) measured the lumi- nosities of the nuclei by spatial analysis of optical images obtained with HST to reduce the contribution from stellar light. A caveat in the use of optical measurements for the definition of radio loudness is extinction, which will lead to an overestimate of RO. Although Ho & Peng (2001) used only type 1 -- 1.9 objects, some objects of these types 4 Y. Terashima & A.S. Wilson: Chandra Snapshot Observations of LINERs with a Compact Radio Core Fig. 3. X-ray luminosity dependence of RX = νLν(5 GHz)/LX for the present LLAGN sample, Seyfert galax- ies, and PG quasars. The boundary between "radio loud" and "radio quiet" objects (log Rx = −4.5) is shown as a horizontal dashed line. References Falcke, H., Nagar, N. M., Wilson, A. S., & Ulvestad, J., S. 2000, ApJ, 542, 197 Finoguenov, A. & Jones, C. 2001, ApJ, 547, L107 Ho, L. C. 1999, ApJ, 516, 672 Ho, L. C., et al. 2001, ApJ, 549, L51 Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1997a, ApJS, 112, 315 Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., Sargent, W. L. W., & Peng, C. Y. 1997b, ApJS, 112, 391 Ho, L. C., & Peng, C. Y. 2001, ApJ, 555, 650 Nagar, N. M., Falcke, H., Wilson, A. S., & Ho, L. C. 2000, ApJ, 542, 186 Nagar, N. M., Falcke, H., Wilson, A. S., & Ulvestad, J. S. 2002, A&A, submitted Nagar, N. M., Wilson, A. S., & Falcke, H. 2001, ApJ, 559, L87 Terashima, Y., Ho, L. C., Iyomoto, N., & Ptak, A. F. 2002a, ApJ, in preparation Terashima, Y., Ho, L .C., & Ptak, A. F. 2000a, ApJ, 539, 161 Terashima, Y., Ho, L .C., Ptak, A. F., et al. 2000b, ApJ, 533, 729 Terashima, Y., Iyomoto, N., Ho, L. C., & Ptak, A. F. 2002b, ApJS, 139, 1 Terashima, Y. & Wilson, A. S. 2002c, ApJ, submitted Turner, M. J., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L110 Turner, T. J., George, I. M., Nandra, K., & Mushotzky, R. M. 1997, ApJS, 113, 23 Ulvestad, J. S., & Ho, L. C. 2001, ApJ, 562, L133 Wilson, A. S. & Yang, Y 2002, ApJ, 568, 133 Fig. 2. Comparison between RO = Lν(5 GHz)/Lν(B) and RX = νLν(5 GHz)/LX for Seyferts and PG quasars. The conventional boundary between "radio loud" and "ra- dio quiet" objects (log RO = 1) is shown as a horizontal dashed line. 1999). This is related to the fact that luminous objects show a more prominent "big blue bump" in their spectra. Figure 8 of Ho (1999) demonstrates that low-luminosity objects are typically 1 -- 1.5 orders of magnitude fainter in the optical band than luminous quasars for an given X-ray luminosity. The definition of radio loudness using the hard X-ray flux (RX) appears to be more robust because X-rays are less affected by both extinction at optical wavelengths and the detailed shape of the blue bump. Further, measure- ments of nuclear X-ray fluxes are much easier than mea- surements of nuclear optical fluxes, since in the latter case the nuclear light must be separated from the surrounding starlight. Fig. 3 shows the X-ray luminosity dependence of RX. In this plot, the LLAGN sample discussed in the present paper is shown in addition to the Seyfert and PG samples used above. This is an "X-ray version" of the log RO-M nuc plot (Fig. 4 in Ho & Peng 2001). Our plot shows that a large fraction of LLAGNs (LX< 1042 ergs s−1) are radio loud. This is a confirmation of Ho & Peng's (2001) finding. Since radio emission in LLAGNs is likely to be dominated by emission from jets (Nagar et al. 2001; Ulvestad & Ho 2001), these results suggest that, in LLAGN, the fraction of the accretion energy that powers a jet, as opposed to electromagnetic radiation, is larger than in more luminous Seyfert galaxies and quasars. B Acknowledgements. Y.T. is supported by the Japan Society for a Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Young Sci- entists. This research was supported by NASA through grants NAG81027 and NAG81755 to the University of Maryland.
astro-ph/0305547	3	0305	2004-08-19T20:20:03	Extracting the Dark Matter Profile of a Relaxed Galaxy Cluster	[ "astro-ph" ]	Knowledge of the structure of galaxy clusters is essential for an understanding of large scale structure in the universe, and may provide important clues to the nature of dark matter. Moreover, the shape of the dark matter distribution in the cluster core may offer insight into the structure formation process. Unfortunately, cluster cores also tend to be the site of complicated astrophysics. X-ray imaging spectroscopy of relaxed clusters, a standard technique for mapping their dark matter distributions, is often complicated by the presence of cool components in cluster cores, and the dark matter profile one derives for a cluster is sensitive to assumptions made about the distribution of this component. In addition, fluctuations in the temperature measurements resulting from normal statistical variance can produce results which are unphysical. We present here a procedure for extracting the dark matter profile of a spherically symmetric, relaxed galaxy cluster which deals with both of these complications. We apply this technique to a sample of galaxy clusters observed with the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and comment on the resulting mass profiles. For some of the clusters we compare their masses with those derived from weak and strong gravitational measurements.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Draft version October 21, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 11/12/01 EXTRACTING THE DARK MATTER PROFILE OF A RELAXED GALAXY CLUSTER J.S. Arabadjis1, M.W. Bautz1, and G. Arabadjis2 Draft version October 21, 2018 ABSTRACT Knowledge of the structure of galaxy clusters is essential for an understanding of large scale structure in the universe, and may provide important clues to the nature of dark matter. Moreover, the shape of the dark matter distribution in the cluster core may offer insight into the structure formation process. Unfortunately, cluster cores also tend to be the site of complicated astrophysics. X-ray imaging spec- troscopy of relaxed clusters, a standard technique for mapping their dark matter distributions, is often complicated by the presence of cool components in cluster cores, and the dark matter profile one derives for a cluster is sensitive to assumptions made about the distribution of this component. In addition, fluctuations in the temperature measurements resulting from normal statistical variance can produce results which are unphysical. We present here a procedure for extracting the dark matter profile of a spherically symmetric, relaxed galaxy cluster which deals with both of these complications. We apply this technique to a sample of galaxy clusters observed with the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and com- ment on the resulting mass profiles. For some of the clusters we compare their masses with those derived from weak and strong gravitational measurements. Subject headings: X-rays : galaxies: clusters -- cosmology : dark matter 1. introduction The cold dark matter (CDM) paradigm of modern cos- mology has enjoyed spectacular success in describing the formation of large-scale structure in the universe (Navarro, Frenk & White 1997; Moore et al. 1999b; Lahav et al. 2001; Peacock et al. 2001). There are, however, several nagging inconsistencies between the results of numerical CDM experiments and observations. On small scales, the dark matter halos in dwarf and low surface brightness galaxies are much less cuspy than in CDM simulations (Burkert 1995; McGaugh & de Blok 1998; Moore et al. 1999b). Disk galaxies produced in simulations tend to have inadequate masses and angular momenta (Navarro & Steinmetz 2000). The number of Milky Way satellites ap- pears to be at least an order of magnitude lower than CDM predictions (Kauffman, White, & Guideroni 1993; Moore et al. 1999a; Klypin et al. 1999). On larger scales, some studies (Tyson, Kochanski & Dell'Antonio 1998; Smail et al. 2000) report galaxy clusters with central density profiles that are flatter than CDM predictions, although these are somewhat controversial (Broadhurst et al. 2000; Shapiro & Iliev 2000). The density profile of bound structures which form through the hierarchical assembly of smaller structures is usually parameterized as a power law at small scales and a separate power law on large scales (e.g. Jing & Suto (2002)): ρ(r) = (r/rs)α(1 + r/rs)γ−α ρ0 (1) 1.0 (Navarro, Frenk & White 1996, 1997) and 1.5 (Moore et al. 1999b; Fukushige & Makino 2001), roughly indepen- dent of halo mass and formation epoch. In nature, how- ever, α shows a larger variation, and is likely a function of halo mass. Hα rotation curves of low-surface bright- ness galaxies indicate density profiles which are signifi- cantly flatter -- α ∼ 0.5 -- than CDM predictions (Swaters, Madore & Trewhella 2001; Dalcanton & Bernstein 2000; Borriello et al. 2003; Swaters et al. 2003). X-ray obser- vations of galaxy clusters generally show steeper profiles, however, with α ∼ 1.2 (Lewis, Buote & Stocke 2002) to 1.9 (Arabadjis, Bautz & Garmire 2002). These discrepancies are often ascribed to limitations of the astrophysics or the physics included in the simulations. Baryon physics, if included, may be tacked on at the con- clusion of a simulation according to a set of semi-analytic and/or empirical prescriptions. It is likely that baryon physics will play a significant role in the evolution of the central halo. Reports of a halo "entropy floor" (Ponman, Cannon & Navarro 1999; Lloyd-Davies, Ponman, & Can- non 2000) suggest non-gravitational sources of heating and feedback either prior to or during halo formation (Balogh, Babul & Patton 1999; Loewenstein 2000; Wu, Fabian & Nulsen 2000) which are probably baryonic in origin (see Mushotzky et al. (2003), however). The question then be- comes one of determining where baryon physics ceases to be important. While the inclusion of baryon astrophysics in sufficient detail may remedy these problems, its effects will require a great deal of effort to disentangle (Frenk 2002). The four parameters in this description are the density ρ0 at some fiducial radius, the inner power law index α, the outer power law index γ, and the scale radius rs setting the break between the two power laws. While it is gen- erally agreed that γ = 3, the value of α has generated considerable debate. Simulations predict a value between 1 Center for Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; [email protected], [email protected] 2 Mitre Corporation, 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730; [email protected] It could be, however, that the missing ingredients in the simulations are not all astrophysical. One possibility is that the initial power spectrum of the primordial fluc- tuations is not scale invariant. If the primordial spectral index of density perturbations is not precisely 1 (as is nor- mally assumed by appealing to standard inflationary cos- 1 2 mology), the formation epoch of halos may be delayed suf- ficiently to ameliorate the central density problem (Alam, Bullock & Weinberg 2002; Zentner & Bullock 2002). An- other possibility is that important dark matter particle physics is being overlooked, and that the assumption of no non-gravitational self-interactions is faulty. Proposed modifications of CDM include, though are not limited to, self-interacting dark matter (Spergel & Steinhardt 2000; Firmani et al. 2000), warm dark matter (Hogan & Dalcan- ton 2000), annihilating dark matter (Kaplinghat, Knox & Turner 2000), scalar field dark matter (Hu & Peebles 2000; Goodman 2000), and mirror matter (Mohapatra, Nussinov & Teplitz 2002), each of which is invoked to soften the core density profile. Many of these modifications will soften the core profile of galaxy clusters as well, in conflict with many X-ray determinations of mass profiles, although other as- trophysical processes such as the adiabatic contraction of core baryons (Hennawi & Ostriker 2002) may mitigate this effect. In an effort to discriminate between CDM modifica- tions and other astrophysical influences we are mapping the dark matter profiles of a large sample of galaxy clus- ters. Specifically, we use imaging spectroscopy from the Chandra X-ray Observatory (Weisskopf et al. 2002) to de- termine the deprojected temperature and density profiles of the baryonic content of each galaxy cluster, which we then use to derive its dark matter profile. In this paper we describe our method, and apply it to a sample of low- and moderate-redshift clusters. We describe our spectral deprojection technique in §2; we discuss the problems in- volved in converting these results to a mass profile and our solution in §3; we examine the effects that cooling flow model assumptions have on our profiles, and we present a statistical analysis of the models and a prescription for choosing among them using Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling in §4. Finally, we summarize our findings in §6. In a subsequent paper we will examine these profiles for their implications for large scale structure formation and dark matter particle properties (Arabadjis & Bautz, in preparation [AB]). 2. spectral deprojection We begin with a Chandra imaging spectroscopic obser- vation of a galaxy cluster using the ACIS detector, either with the S3 chip or the I array. We start with a level 2 data set that has been processed in the usual way, filtered for periods of high background using the procedures described in the CIAO Science Threads3, with point sources removed (for details see Arabadjis, Bautz & Garmire (2002)). Af- ter locating the center of the projected emissivity, we lay down a series of adjacent, concentric annuli centered on the emission peak. The annular dimensions are set to include enough source photons (1000-2000+) to reliably determine the plasma temperature. RMF and ARF response matri- ces are constructed, as is a background spectrum from a region external to the outermost annulus. The spectra are recorded in PI format, and grouped such that there is a minimum of 20 counts per channel. Our spectral deprojection has been presented elsewhere (Arabadjis, Bautz & Garmire 2002), and so we just briefly summarize here. To derive spherical radial profiles we con- 3 See http://asc.harvard.edu/ciao/threads/all.html struct a model consisting of N concentric spherical shells whose inner and outer radii correspond to the inner and outer cylindrical radii of the projected annuli in the data set. The volume intersection matrix V, whose elements Vij contain the volume of spherical shell j intersected by a cylindrical shell formed by the projection of annulus i, is used to set the linear relations between each of the normal- izations as specified by the binning geometry. Each shell i on [1, N ] (1 is the innermost shell -- a sphere -- and N is the outermost shell) contains an optically thin thermal plasma whose emission characteristics are determined by the MEKAL model (Mewe, Gronenschild & van den Oord 1986; Mewe, Lemen & van den Oord 1986; Kaastra 1992; Liehdal, Osterheld & Goldstein 1995) within XSPEC (Ar- naud 1996) using two free parameters, the temperature T and the normalization K. In some models we will allow the innermost Nc shells to contain a second emission component at a (lower) temper- ature Tc as a first-order treatment of the cooler plasma. This cool component is assumed to be in pressure equi- librium with the hot component; this means that the cool and hot components cannot both be in hydrostatic equi- librium. We assume that the hot component is in hydro- static equilibrium. We adopt this form for the cooling flow model for two reasons: (1) there is no evidence that the plasma in cooling flow cluster cores cools below about 1 keV (Peterson et al. 2003) as in the isobaric cooling flow model of Mushotzky & Szymkowiak (2003), and (2) it is arguably the simplest adjustment that can be made to the uniphase model. The cool component could be arranged in droplets or filaments which are replenished as they migrate to the unspecified sink at r = 0, effecting a hydrodynam- ical equilibrium. The details of the geometry of the cool component are unimportant since they are below our spa- tial resolution limit; it is only our assumption that it is in pressure equilbrium with the hot component which has observational consequences. In this study we use the pres- sure gradient in the core to measure the radial dependence of the enclosed gravitating mass. The number of parameters in this model is rather large. Each MEKAL component contains six parameters, of which two (T and K) are allowed to vary. Thus the N annuli in the data set are modelled using N + Nc emis- sion components. Including a Galactic absorption column yields a model with 6(N + Nc) + 1 parameters (although only a subset of these actually vary). Each of the N annuli independently constrain between 1 and N of the model shells in the fitting, and so the complete XSPEC model contains N [6(N + Nc) + 1] components, 2(N + Nc) + 1 of them variable. The current version of XSPEC admits models with 1000 parameters, any 100 of which can vary. This limits our model to N = 12 annuli for Nc = 0 (876 parameters, 25 variable) and N = 10 annuli for Nc = 2 (730 parameters, 25 variable). We have written a program which reads in the data annuli dimensions and writes out an XSPEC script that handles all of the data manipula- tion. The script initializes the model parameters, performs the χ2 minimization, and calculates parameter uncertain- ties. This software is available to the public through re- quests to the authors. Most spectral deprojection schemes rely on an "onion peeling" approach (Fabian et al. 1981; Allen & Fabian 1997; David et al. 2001; Lewis, Stocke & Buote 2002; Sun et al. 2003): the outermost annulus is modeled using the outermost spherical shell; its model parameters are then frozen and its emission is subtracted from all annuli in- terior to it. The next most outer shell is then modelled, the resulting model again frozen and subtracted from the interior, and so forth, until the entire cluster has been modelled. The virtue of this technique is that the number of model components scales as N instead of N 2, allow- ing for greater spatial detail. However, because the pa- rameters of each model shell are frozen and the model is subtracted from interior shells as if it contained zero un- certainty, the technique does not find the global "best fit" of the model parameters. In many cases, the errors quoted in onion-peeling analyses are the uncertainties associated with a single layer of the onion (David et al. 2001). Error estimates derived from Monte Carlo simulations are more reliable, limited primarily by the number of simulations used to estimate the uncertainties (Lewis, Stocke & Buote 2002). In our study all of the model parameters are fit simultaneously; the subsequent determination of error in subsets of interesting variables is a true expression of the parameter uncertainties in the model. We note here that although our model appears to have many more parame- ters than the other techniques, in actuality the numbers are equivalent because of the web of linear dependences among the component normalizations. 3. mass profiles Many deprojection methods rely on analytic formulae for the radial run of temperature, surface brightness or mass, either during or after the fitting process (Allen 2001; David et al. 2001; Hicks et al. 2002; Pizzolato et al. 2003). The greatest advantage of a parametric treatment is nu- merical stability. In addition, it is common practice to smooth noisy profiles before using them in subsequent cal- culations. This latter technique is especially useful when deriving gravitating mass profiles since a numerical deriva- tive must be computed. A serious drawback of these ap- proaches is that it is difficult to quantify the effect of the parameterization, or the smoothing, on the results. Ad- ditionally, it is often difficult or impossible to propagate errors through to the results. Our non-parametric deprojection technique does not guarantee smooth temperature and density profiles, so we have devised a method whereby the mass profile is computed from within the error envelope of (ρ(r), T (r)). By choosing a statistically reasonable realization of the model, we are able to compute mass profiles which are not only smoother than those obtained from the uncon- strained (ρ, T ) set, but which avoid the unphysical results that arise due to the statistical fluctuations inherent in measurements. Essentially, our procedure imposes phys- ically motivated constraints to reduce the uncertainty in the temperature and mass profiles, and provides a statistic which characterizes the reliability of the mass reconstruc- tion. The standard procedure for extracting the gravititating mass profile of a galaxy cluster is to insert its deprojected temperature and density profiles into the hydrostatic equa- tion (Sarazin 1988): Mr = − kT Gµmp/r (cid:18) d log T d log r + d log ρ d log r(cid:19) , Here T and ρ are the local (baryonic) plasma temperature and density, r is the spherical radius, Mr is the total mass enclosed within r (i.e. baryons plus dark matter), and mp and µ are the proton mass and mean particle weight, re- spectively. Implicit here is the assumption that the cluster is supported solely by an isotropic thermal pressure gra- dient, i.e. that random motions greatly exceed the bulk rotational motion, and that the magnetic field energy den- sity is negligible in comparison with the thermal energy content of the plasma. We further assume that no recent merger event has caused a disruption in the pressure and density. Given the run of density and temperature in our binning scheme (ri, ρi, and Ti, i = 1, 2, ..., N ), we can calculate Mi using a simple difference equation version of Equation 2: Mi = −A ri Ti(cid:18) ti+1 − ti−1 + di+1 − di−1 xi+1 − xi−1 (cid:19) (3) where A = k/Gµmp, xi = log10 (ri), di = log10 (ρi), and ti = log10 (Ti). Since the goal of this technique is to derive enclosed mass profiles, we define r as the outer radius of each shell. Because of measurement error a mass profile calculated in this way is not guaranteed to be physically reasonable. Even if the assumptions of spherical symmetry and hy- drostatic equilibrium were valid, statistical fluctuations in the temperature measurements could result in unphysical points in our derived mass profile, for example dMr/dr < 0 or even Mr < 0. To deal with the non-physical fluctua- tions, we proceed under the assumptions that all unphys- ical values in the mass profile are due to measurement uncertainty in either ρ or T . Specifically, to estimate the (ρ, T ) profiles we impose the condition that the computed total gravitating mass profile is consistent with ρ(total) = ρ(baryons) + ρ(dark matter) ≥ 0 for 3 (2) r ≥ 0 (4) dMr dr and 1/4πr2 is positive definite, Since ρ(total) = 1 this is equivalent to the constraint dMr/dr ≥ 0 4πr2 (5) Combining Equation 5 with the boundary condition Mr(0) ≥ 0 (e.g., allowing for the presence of an unresolved central object) we obtain a second constraint: Mr(r) ≥ 0 (6) Perhaps the most natural way to impose these condi- tions would be to invoke them as a Bayesian prior in the spectral fitting procedure. Bayes' Theorem (Bayes 1763; Papoulis 1984) states that the probability of model M given data set D (the posterior distribution P (MD)) is proportional to the product of the probability of that data set given the model (the likelihood function P (DM )) and the probability of the model itself (the prior knowledge function P (M)). P (MD) ∝ P (DM) · P (M) (7) The model prior could be chosen to enforce the constraints in Equations 5 and 6. Thus for certain combinations of model parameters Ti, ρi, we could choose a prior such that P (M(Ti, ρi)) = 0. terms in a cost function, and henceforth refer to the opti- mized solution for M as the constrained profile, with the understanding that it is an estimate of the fully Bayesian solution, and that the constraints do not rigorously for- bid excursion into disfavored regions of parameter space. Our formulation of the cost function will reflect our subjec- tive assessment of the relative importance of fidelity versus physicality, and use standard optimization algorithms to minimize it. We use the likelihood to characterize the fidelity term in the cost function. The probability density P at the vector (ρ, T ) = ( ρ1, ρ2, ..., ρN , T1, T2, ..., TN ), which is near the unconstrained profiles (ρ, T ), is given by N Yi=1 P = (2π)N/2 (σρi σTi )−1 e−( ρi−ρi)2/2σ2 ρi e−( Ti−Ti)2/2σ2 Ti (10) where we have assumed that the errors in ρ and T are un- correlated and normally distributed, characterized by σρi and σTi , respectively.4 In maximum likelihood methods, cost functions are conveniently defined as the negative log of the likelihood (e.g. von Mises (1964)), so we define the fidelity penalty function Q as Q = −2 log P = N log(2π) + 2 N Xi=1 " log σρi + log σTi + ( ρi − ρi)2 2σ2 ρi + ( Ti − Ti)2 2σ2 Ti # = Q0 + χ2 (11) Here Q0 is a constant that depends only on the measure- ment errors and χ2 is the 2N -dimensional variance: χ2 = N Xi=1 " ( ρi − ρi)2 σ2 ρi + ( Ti − Ti)2 σ2 Ti # = χ2 ρ + χ2 T (12) We will ignore Q0 since it will not affect the minimization. We follow a similar procedure to derive the physical- ity terms in the cost function. We wish to incorporate the physicality contraints by penalizing negative values of Yi and Zi in Equations 8 and 9 without attempting to maximize them if they are positive. Consider the penalty function g(x) = (x/x0 − x/x0)η + (x/x0 − 1 + x/x0 − 1)η 4 Unfortunately this approach is computationally imprac- tical. The difficulty lies in the fact that the relatively sim- ple constraints on M (r) and dM/dr lead to complicated (nonlinear) constraints of the coupled parameters of the spectral models (Ki, Ti). The problem is more tractable if we instead apply the Bayesian constraints after uncon- strained density and temperature profiles have been deter- mined using the spectral deprojection method described in §2. Thus we compute an unconstrained mass profile from Equation 3, and check it for consistency with the constraints in Equations 5 and 6. These three equations yield constraints on the solutions to the difference equa- tions which we define using Yi and Zi: Yi = −(ti+1 − ti−1 + di+1 − di−1) ≥ 0 (8) Zi = −ri+1Ti+1(cid:18) ti+2 − ti + di+2 − di + riTi(cid:18) ti+1 − ti−1 + di+1 − di−1 xi+1 − xi−1 xi+2 − xi (cid:19) (cid:19) ≥ 0 (9) Physically these constraints prohibit the pressure of the X-ray emitting plasma from rising with radius. Using the model parameter error estimates as a guide, we allow the temperature and normalization of each model component to vary if either of these constraints is violated by the pro- file. Our goal is thus to find a new set of density and temperature values ρ and T which are as close as possible to the the original profiles ("fidelity") but which obey the constraints of Equations 8 and 9 ("physicality"). At first glance this appears to be a standard problem in constrained optimization. Two features of the prob- lem suggest than an alternate route is preferable, how- ever. First, as mentioned above, the constraints are non- linear functions of the independent variables, so the con- strained optimization approach is very complex. Second, if we exercise control over the competing interests of fi- delity and physicality, as incorporated in a penalty func- tion, rather than simply eliminating solutions which vio- late Equations 8 and 9, we retain the ability to modulate departures from the unconstrained profiles. For example, it may be the case that the temperature profile would need substantial alteration in order to satisfy the rigid imposi- tion of constraints 8 and 9, but that a minor violation of Equation 9 (say, at only one point in the mass profile) would allow a temperature profile of much greater fidelity. In this instance it is to our advantage to have the abil- ity to set the relative weighting between the fidelity and physicality terms in the penalty function. Implicit in our choice of a penalty function to represent the constraints is the assumption that our estimate of the location of the peak of the model probability distribution function Pest(M(Ti, ρi)), obtained by enforcing fidelity, is close to the actual peak of the distribution P0(M(Ti, ρi)), which would obtain if the Bayesian priors were utilized during the spectral deprojection. This idea is shown schematically in Figure 1. As the figure illustrates, in the absence of significant small-scale structure in P (M(Ti, ρi)), Pest(M(Ti, ρi)) will ideed lie near P0(M(Ti, ρi)) in parame- ter space. We therefore cast our physicality constraints as 4 In principle it would be more accurate to make use of the fact that the luminosity of a shell i, Li ∝ ρ2 observations, and therefore that deviations in d and t are correlated: δd = − uncertainty in the temperature of a shell is enormous compared with the uncertainty in its density. (η > 1) − ln(cid:0) 1 2(cid:1) + ln(C) (13) This function has several useful properties: (1) it has a value of zero for 0 ≤ x ≤ x0; (2) it increases rapidly for x < 0 or x > x0; (3) it has a continuous first derivative everywhere for η ≥ 2 (or everywhere but x = 0 or x = x0 for 1 < η < 2), making it well-suited for optimization rou- tines that rely on gradient information to increase their efficiency; and (4) h(x) = e−g(x) is a well-behaved proba- bility distribution function. C is of order one; for arbitrary values of η > 1 it can be determined numerically. g(x) and h(x) are shown in Figure 2. We employ g(x) to characterize the two physicality re- quirements, Mr ≥ 0 and dMr/dr ≥ 0, in their difference , is tightly constrained by the δt 4 . In practice, however, this is unnecessary since the relative i T 1/2 i equation form (Equations 8 and 9). In both cases x0 is set to a large value that we don't expect to exceed. In the former case we set it to 1018 M⊙; in the latter we can use the equivalent of d log(Mr)/d log(r) ≤ 3, corresponding to the upper limit for a monotonically decreasing density profile. We can ignore the normalization and set K = 1 since we will be weighting the physicality penalties against the fidelity penalty. The complete cost function f for the minimization is thus: N f = [ A1 g(Yi) + A2 g(Zi) ] + χ2 (14) Xi=1 The weights A1 and A2 and the exponent η are chosen to determine whether the departure from the unconstrained profile is reasonable to achieve a physically acceptable so- lution. Conveniently, this technique has a built-in gauge of the fidelity, the χ2 value of the constrained profiles (although it should be noted that it is not distributed as the clas- sical χ2). If χ2 . 1 then we consider the new profile to be a reasonable excursion within the profile's uncertainty envelope. Moreover, we identify the constrained profiles (ρ, T , Mr) as a closer approximation to the true profiles, under the assumption that our model is correct. Con- versely, χ2 ≫ 1 indicates that the (ρ, T ) profiles require excessive alteration to produce a physically sensible mass profile. This could indicate that our assumptions of spher- ical symmetry and/or hydrostatic equilibrium are invalid, that there is significant spatial or spectral substructure, or that our thermal emission model is inadequate. Regardless of the root cause, the accuracy of such a profile is suspect. Nulsen & Bohringer (1995) (hereafter NB95) developed a non-parametric approach to this problem which also makes use of the fact that the enclosed gravitating mass of a cluster must be monotonically increasing. With their method one obtains a series of interdependent constraints on the mass at each point in r. These constraints are trans- lated into a set of likelihood functions which are assumed to be independent for computational ease. These likeli- hood functions are jointly maximized to derive the mass profile. Our method is similar in that it makes use of a likelihood function based upon excursions within an uncer- tainty envelope. The methods differ significantly, however, in the deprojection algorithm (NB95 use onion-peeling), and in the enforcement of the mass constraints. In NB95, the mass constraints are absolute; in our method they can be invoked to any degree -- they can be rigidly enforced, completely ignored, or somewhere in between. The χ2 metric of the fidelity is a powerful tool. If the physical- ity weight is set to an arbitrarily large value, we force the profile to monotonically increase, in effect obtaining the result of the NB95 technique. As a biproduct we obtain the plasma temperature and density profiles which are re- quired, and the χ2 value immediately tells us how likely it is that the temperature and density measurements con- spired to achieve this condition. In cases where rigid im- position of the constraints yields an unacceptably high χ2 value, one can experiment with different weights and ex- amine the resulting profiles to ascertain, for example, if the problem is due to a single outlier, or is more systemic, possibly indicative of a breakdown of hydrostatic equilib- rium. Thus the flexibility of our method with regard to the 5 mass constraints allows us to extract information about the dynamical state of the X-ray plasma and the presence of statistical anomalies in the data. 4. choosing a model: the f test and markov chain monte carlo sampling In the previous section we assumed that the underly- ing model is correct. There is some uncertainty, however, about the form the model should take. As mentioned pre- viously, the best candidates for this type of analysis are relaxed cooling flow clusters. These systems are currently not well understood, yet the way we model the cool plasma can have a significant effect on the resulting mass profile, and conclusions we may draw about the properties of dark matter particles or the evolution of large scale structure (Arabadjis, Bautz & Garmire 2002). A standard procedure for choosing between a simple model Ms and a complex model Mc is to utilize the F test (Bevington 1969). This is done by computing the F value for the data set D: F = χ2(MsD) − χ2(McD) χ2(MsD)/ν(Ms) (15) and comparing it to the standard F distribution. Here χ2(MsD) and χ2(McD) are the sum of the squares of the error-weighted residuals in the spectroscopic least-squares fit to the simple and complex models, respectively, and ν(Ms) is the number of degrees of freedom in the simple model. Unfortunately, the standard F test is not applicable in this context. As Protassov et al. (2002) have pointed out, the standard F test is valid only in cases where the simple model is nested within the complex model. In the present case, the simple model lies on a boundary of the complex model. That is, the simple model is a special case of the complex model, with the normalization of the second emis- sion component in the core set to zero. This means that its F distribution may deviate significantly from the norm (see Figure 3). Instead we must construct an empirical F distribution by sampling the probability distribution func- tion of the simple model, simulating a data set for each sample item, and applying both models to the simulated data. Once our F distribution has been constructed, we can judge the significance of the extra emission component based upon the location within the distribution of the F value for the data (Protassov et al. 2002). We employ the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling technique Neal (1993); van Dyk et al. (2001); Lewis & Bridle (2002); Hobson & McLachlan (2002) to build a large sample of data realizations from which to construct an empirical F distribution. Let P (x) repre- sent the posterior probability distribution function of the parameters x = x1, x2, ..., xN determined by fitting the simple model Ms to a real data set D0. We can sample P (x) by taking a rejection-based random walk through the parameter space. We define a transition probability T (xn, xn+1) as the probability of moving from an initial set of parameters xn to a new set of parameters xn+1. T depends on the value of the posterior distribution at the original and new parameter sets. Let q(xn, xn+1) be an ar- bitrary proposal distribution; that is, the probability that the new proposed parameter set is xn+1 given that we are 6 presently at xn. If we accept the proposed parameter set with probability α, then α(xn, xn+1) = T (xn, xn+1) q(xn, xn+1) (16) which takes into account the odds of actually stepping to the new location in parameter space, q(xn, xn+1), and the odds of such a transition between the two locations being accepted, T (xn, xn+1). The acceptance probability α is calculated from α(xn, xn+1) = min(cid:20)1, P (xn+1) q(xn+1, xn) P (xn) q(xn, xn+1) (cid:21) (17) In our case we use a particular form of MCMC sam- pling called the Metroplis algorithm (see, e.g., Neal (1993)) which uses a symmetric proposal distribution function: q(xn, xn+1) = q(xn+1, xn) (18) This prescription for wandering through parameter space constitutes a Markov chain since each new param- eter set is chosen according to a probability distribution function that depends only upon the previous set of values. In the case of the Metropolis algorithm, it is straightfor- ward to show that P (x) is an invariant distribution of the Markov chain. Using Equations 16 and 17 we have P (xn) T (xn, xn+1) = P (xn) q(xn, xn+1) α(xn, xn+1) = q(xn, xn+1) min[P (xn), P (xn+1)](19) Making use of the symmetry of q in the Metropolis algo- rithm, we have = q(xn+1, xn) min[P (xn), P (xn+1)] = P (xn+1) q(xn+1, xn) α(xn+1, xn) resulting in P (xn) T (xn, xn+1) = P (xn+1) T (xn+1, xn) (20) This statement of detailed balance demonstrates that P (x) is a stationary distribution of the Markov chain. This is necessary, though not sufficient, to ensure that we can sample P (x) directly using an appropriately selected chain of Monte Carlo simulations. The other necessary condi- tion, ergodicity, ensures that any substring of the Markov chain will asymptotically approach P (x) regardless of the initial conditions, although a derivation of this property is beyond the scope of this paper. For a complete discussion see Neal (1993). In many applications of MCMC sampling one pays spe- cial attention to the finite "burn-in" period during which the Markov chain equilibrates. The length of the burn-in phase depends upon the sensibility of the starting point, and the appropriateness of the scale chosen for the pro- posal probability distribution step. This is not a consider- ation in our case because we start each MCMC sample at the (already known) peak of the probability distribution function P (x). Given P (x) computed by the MCMC process, we can construct an empirical F distribution and perform an F test on the significance of a second emission component in the core. The entire procedure is as follows: 1. Model the real data set D0 with Ms; call the best-fit parameters x s 0. 2. Use XSPEC to calculate P (D0x) (i.e., the likelihood). 3. Use Bayes' Theorem to calculate P (xD0) (see Equation 7). We discard all unphys- ical excursions in parameter space, i.e. where T < 0 or ρ < 0. (In practice, we discard at the level of the model normal- ization, not ρ, but ρ is simply a function of the normalization and the binning ge- ometry.) s 4. Create a large sample of model parame- i using P (xD0) and the Metropo- ters x lis algorithm form of the MCMC tech- i, compute a fake data nique. For each x set Di, including instrumental effects of the Chandra telescope and detectors, as well as counting statistics. s 5. Model each Di using both Ms and Mc. 6. For each pair of models tabulate its F value given by Equation 15. 7. Bin up the set of F values, creating an un- normalized histogram , and superimpose the F value of the original data. In practice this recipe is computationally intensive, not because of any features of the MCMC sampling per se, but because each of the faked spectra must be modelled twice. For a sample size of 1000 simulations, XSPEC must simulate 1000 spectra and calculate 2002 sets of best-fit values for the model parameters (including the original data). This fact leads us to simplify the method. First, in order to reduce the modelling time, we have adopted a simplified core-halo geometry. In this scheme the "core" is represented by a single shell (in this case a sphere), while the halo is represented by another shell. Thus Ms contains four parameters, the temperature and density of each of the two shells, while Mc contains six, the additional two parameters representing the temperature and density of a second cospatial emission component in the core. This simplification also greatly improves the numerical stability of the fitting procedure. The algorithm (steps 1-6 above) is implemented in a Tcl script run within XSPEC. Once we have completed step 7 we can distinguish be- tween the models. The location of the F value of the data within this empirical F distribution contains information regarding the relative merit of Ms and Mc. We define the significance S of the distribution as N (F ) dF 0 N (F ) dF 0 S = R Fdata R ∞ (21) The signficance S = 1 − Pf , where Pf is the probability that the simple model constitutes the better description, and that the F value of the data is this large strictly by chance. Thus, for a one-parameter model, S = 0.68, 0.90, and 0.99 may be interpreted as 1-, 2- and 3-σ detections of the additional component. We checked the sensitiv- ity of this method by applying it to five simulated data sets with known mixtures of hot (T = 5.0 kev) and cold (T = 1.0 kev) X-ray plasmas in pressure equilbrium. We use mass ratios of MC/MH = 0.000, 0.0222, 0.0500, 0.0857, and 0.133, and run 100 MCMC simulations for each. Fig- ure 4 shows an empirical F distribution for each of these cases. The F value of the data is shown with a dashed vertical line. For a multiphase plasma of which only 2.2% is in the cold component, the detection of the multiphase plasma is better than 2σ. At 5% and greater, the detection is statistically highly significant. 5. application to chandra clusters We illustrate these techniques using a X-ray observa- tions of a sample of bright, apparently relaxed galaxy clus- ters (see Table 1). Each of these clusters (except A1689) contains a significant amount of cooler plasma in its core, and is known as a classical "cooling flow cluster" since the core radiative cooling time is shorter than the age of the cluster. We prepared each archived data set as de- scribed in Arabadjis, Bautz & Garmire (2002) and mod- elled the emission using the two models described in §2. In the first model, each shell contains isothermal plasma (Nc = 0), while in the other, the central two shells are also allowed a second (cooler) emission component (Nc = 2), and the best-fit parameter values are obtained iteratively using XSPEC. Figures 5-14 show baryon density, baryon temperature, enclosed spherical gravitating mass, and en- closed cylindrical gravitating mass profiles for each cluster in the sample. The left panels show Nc = 0 models; the right show Nc = 2 model. The unconstrained profiles are shown as data points, with red [blue] symbols represent- ing the hot [cool] plasma components. (Data points which lie outside the ordinate range are indicated by arrows.) Constrained profiles are drawn as solid curves; the density and temperature contributions to the χ2 value of the con- strained solutions are listed in Table 2. The last column in that table lists the MCMC significance S of the pres- ence of multiphase gas in each cluster core as determined from the MCMC-derived empirical F distributions shown in Figure 15. For the subset of five clusters which are arguably the most relaxed, and are best described by an NFW profile (A1689, A1835, A2029, MS1358 and MS2137; see AB), we overlay the projected mass profiles with weak and/or strong lensing measurements from the literature (see Table 3 for references). Weak lensing mass profiles or isothermal sphere fits to weak lensing data are shown in vi- olet; strong lensing measurements are shown in green. We adopt H0 = 67 km s−1 Mpc−1, ΩΛ = 0.7 and Ωm = 0.3. A detailed analysis of these profiles and their conse- quences for cosmology and dark matter candidates is in preparation (AB), so we make only a few brief comments here. Of the ten clusters presented here, only HydraA did not admit a second emission component in the core -- attempts to add one resulted in the temperature of the second component being set to the temperature of the first in the fitting procedure. This is consistent with previous Chandra (David et al. 2001) and XMM-Newton (Kaastra 2004) results. Four of the clusters show evidence for mul- tiphase core plasma at the 99% significance level -- A2029, A2204, MS1358 and ZW3146 (see Table 2). This is con- sistent with the study of Kaastra (2004), which finds evi- dence for multiphase plasma in many clusters. (Note that, with 1000 MCMC simulations per cluster, the precision of the significance estimate is ∼3%.) For comparison, a clus- ter which contained no second plasma component would, on the average, show an MCMC significance of order 0.5, or 50%. These clusters show a greater difference in their core masses between the uni- and multiphase models. This 7 phenomenon is illustrated for two clusters, MS1358 and MS2137, in Figures 16 and 17. The mass of MS1358 in the multiphase model is about a factor of two larger in than the uniphase mass, and its MCMC significance S=0.987. MS2137, on the other hand, with an MCMC significance of 0.271, shows very little difference between the two mass models. This is perhaps unsurprising, as one would expect that a significant amount of cospatial cool plasma in its core would not only display a clear observa- tional signature but would also affect the equilibrium con- figuration of the plasma. MS2137 and ZW3146 also pro- vide an interesting contrast. In the pre-Chandra/XMM- Newton era, both clusters were reported to harbor cooling flows with mass deposition rates in excess of 1000 M⊙y−1 (Allen 2000), yet they show remarkably disparate evidence for multiphase plasma in their cores (S(MS2137)=0.271; S(ZW3146)=0.989). This suggests that there may be more than one mechanism at work responsible for the presence of 1 keV plasma at the center of galaxy clusters. For each constrained reconstruction we use η = 2.5 and physicality weights A1 = A2 = A12 originally set to 1 × 10−6. While this often will not rigidly enforce con- straint equation 5, it is usually sufficient to enforce equa- tion 6. In those cases where not even equation 6 is satis- fied, we increased A12 by factors of 10 until the resulting profile was nonnegative everywhere if possible. This is the origin of the unacceptably high values of the χ2 fidelity measures for the Nc = 2 model of A2104 and the Nc = 1 model of HydraA. Obviously, the fidelity of a constrained profile tends to be greater when the unconstrained pro- file shows only one or two significant outliers. In some cases (e.g. A1795) a very small adjustment to the temper- ature profile produces a large change in the derived mass. This is due to the competition between the derivatives in equation 2 -- if a statistical fluctuation in the tempera- ture measurement is large enough (and positive) it will swamp the surface brightness decrement at that radius, resulting in a very low or even negative mass. In cases where d log T /d log r & −d log ρ/d log r, a relatively minor adjustment in the temperature can remove an unphysical point from the mass profile. The five very relaxed clusters generally show better agreement with weak lensing mass measurements than they do with strong lensing. The reprojected profile A1689 shows the least agreement with the weak lensing, differing by up to a factor of two at some radii, although the lensing profile is a singular isothermal sphere (IS) fit to weak lens- ing measurements (King, Clowe & Schneider 2002). The strong lensing measurement of Wu (2000), however, ex- ceeds our profile again by a factor of 2. The error bars are derived by assuming two values of the (unknown) strong lensing arc redshift (0.8 and 2.0); the discrepancy is thus unlikely to be due to incorrect source redshift. Our pro- file is also systematically in excess of the IS fit to weak lensing observations of A1835 (Clowe & Schneider 2002), although it is consistent with the strong lensing point of Allen (1998). A2029 and MS1358 show remarkable agree- ment with weak lensing data (Menard, Erben & Mellier 2003; Hoekstra et al. 1998), although the strong lensing measurement in MS1358 (Franx et al. 1997; Allen 1998) is moderately discrepant, as is the strong lensing measure- ment of MS2137 (Sand, Treu & Ellis 2002). These issues 8 will be addressed in greater detail in AB. 6. summary We have presented a technique for calculating the dark matter profile of a spherical, relaxed galaxy cluster. We have formulated a technique for coping with statistical un- certainty in the measurement of the cluster plasma tem- perature. We have also described a method for determin- ing whether there is a statistically significant presence of multiphase plasma in the galaxy cluster core. We have applied these tools to a sample of relaxed galaxy clusters observed with Chandra, and find that 4/10 require a mul- tiphase treatment of their core plasma. Our masses are in broad agreement with weak lensing studies, though are of- ten exceeded by those derived from strong lensing models. JSA would like to thank Steve Allen, Aaron Lewis, Jimmy Irwin and Renato Dupke for many enlightening discussions. The authors would like to thank the anony- mous referee for comments which have improved this pa- per. This work was supported by SAO Grant AR3-4016X. REFERENCES 9 Alam, S.M.K., Bullock, J.S. & Weinberg, D.H. 2002, ApJ, 572, 34 Allen, S.W. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 269 Allen, S.W. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 392 Allen, S.W. & Fabian, A.C. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 583 Allen, S.W., Fabian, A.C., Johnstone, R.M., Arnaud, K.A. & Nulsen, P.E.J. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 589 Arabadjis, J.S., Bautz, M.W. & Garmire, G.P. 2002, ApJ, 572, 78 Arnaud, K.A. 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, George H. Jacoby & Jeannette Barnes, eds., ASP Conf. Ser., 101, 17 Balogh, M.L., Babul, A. & Patton, D.R., 1999, MNRAS, 307, 463 Bayes, T. 1763, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 53, 370 Bevington, P.R. 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill) Boriello, A., Salucci, P. & Danese, L. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1109 Broadhurst, T., Huang, X., Frye, B., & Ellis, R. 2000, ApJ, 534, 15 Burkert, A. 1995, ApJ, 447, L25 Clowe, D.I. & Schneider, P. 2002, A&A, 395, 385 Dalcanton, J.J. & Bernstein, R.A. 2000, in XVth IAP Meeting, Dynamics of Galaxies: From the Early Universe to the Present, eds. F. Combes, G.A. Mamon & V. Charmandaris David, L.P., Nulsen, P.E.J., McNamara, B.R., Forman, W., Jones, C., Ponman, T., Robertson, B. & Wise, M. 2001, ApJ, 557, 546 Fabian, A.C., Hu, E.M., Cowie, L.L. & Grindlay, J. 1981, ApJ, 248, 47 Firmani, C., D'Onghia, E., Avila-Reese, V., Chincarini, G. & Hern´andez, X. 2000, MNRAS, 315, L29 Franx, M., Illingworth, G.D., Kelson, D.D., van Dokkum, P.G. & Tran, K.-V. 1997, ApJ, 486, L75 Frenk, C.S. 2002, Phi. Trans. Roy. Soc., 300, 1277 Fukushige, T. & Makino, J. 2001, ApJ557533 Goodman, J. 2000, New Astron., 5, 103 Hennawi, J.F. & Ostriker, J.P. 2002, ApJ, 572, 41 Hicks, A.K., Wise, M.W., Houck, J.C. & Canizares, C.R. 2002, ApJ, 580, 763 Hobston, M.P. & McLachlan, C. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 765 Hoekstra, H., Franx, M. & Kuijken, K. 1998, ApJ, 504, 636 Hogan, C.J. & Dalcanton, J.J. 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 063511 Hu, W. & Peebles, P.J.E. 2000, ApJ, 528, 61 Jing, Y.P. & Suto, Y. 2002, ApJ, 574, 538 Kaastra, J.S., Tamura, T., Peterson, J.R., Bleeker, J.A.M., Ferrigno, C., Kahn, S.M., Paerels, F.B.S., Piffaretti, R., Branduardi- Raymont, G. & Bohringer, H. 2004, A&A, 413, 415 Kaastra, J.S. 1992, An X-Ray Spectral Code for Optically Thin Plasmas, Internal SRON-Leiden Report, version 2.0. Kaplinghat, M., Knox, L. & Turner, M.S. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 3335 Kauffman, G., White, S.D.M., & Guiderdoni, B. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201 ApJ, k522, 82 King, L.J., Clowe, D.I. & Schneider, P. 2002, A&A, 383, 118 Klypin, A.A., Kravtsov, A.V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. 1999, Lahav, O, Bridle, S.L., Percival, W.J., Peacock, J.A., Efstathiou, G., Baugh, C.M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., Cole, S., Colless, M., Collins, C., Couch, W., Dalton, G., de Propris, R., Driver, S.P., Ellis, R.S., Frenk, C.S., Glazebrook, K., Jackson, C., Lewis, I., Lumsden, S., Maddox, S., Madgwick, D.S., Moody, S., Norberg, P., Peterson, B.A., Sutherland, W., & Taylor, K. 2001, MNRAS, 333, 961 Lewis, A. & Bridle, S. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 103511 Lewis, A.D., Buote, D.A. & Stocke, J.T. 2002, ApJ, in press (astro- ph/0209205) Lewis, A.D., Stocke, J.T. & Buote 2002, ApJL, 573, L13 Liedahl, D.A., Osterheld, A.L. & Goldstein, W.H. 1995, ApJL, 438, L115 Lloyd-Davies, E.J., Ponman, T.J. & Cannon, D.B., 2000, MNRAS, 315, 689 Loewenstein, M., 2000, ApJ, 532, 17 McGaugh, S.S. & de Blok, W.J.G. 1998, ApJ, 499, 41 Menard, B., Erben, T. & Mellier, Y. 2003, ASP Conf. Ser., 301, xxx Mewe, R., Gronenschild, E.H.B.M. & van den Oord, G.H.J. 1985, A&AS, 62, 197 Mewe, R., Lemen, J.R. & van den Oord, G.H.J. 1986, A&AS, 65, 511 Mohapatra, R.N., Nussinov, S. & Teplitz, V.L. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 063002 Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., Stadel, J., & Tozzi, P. 1999a, ApJL, 524, L19 Moore, B., Quinn, T., Governato, F., Stadel, J. & Lake, G. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 1147 Mushotzky, R., Figueroa-Feliciano, E., Loewenstein, M. & Snowden, S.L. 2003, astro-ph/0302267 Mushotzky, R. F. & Szymkowiak, A.E. 1988, in Cooling flows in Clusters and Galaxies, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 53 Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S. & White, S.D.M. 1997, ApJ, 462, 563 Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S. & White, S.D.M. 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 Navarro, J.F. & Steinmetz, M. 2000, ApJ, 528, 607 Neal, R.M. 1993, Technical Report CRG-TR-93-1, University of Toronto (ftp://ftp.cs.utoronto.ca/pub/radford/review.ps) Nulsen, P.E.J. & Bo"ohringer, H. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 1093 [NB95] Papoulis, A. 1984, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (New York: McGraw Hill) Peacock, J.A. et al. 2001, Nature, 410, 169 Peterson, J.R., Kahn, S.M., Paerels, F.B.S., Kaastra, J.S., Tamura, T., Bleeker, J.A.M., Ferrigno, C. & Jernigan, J.G. 2003, ApJ, 590, 207 Pizzolato, F, Molendi, S., Ghizzardi, S. & de Grandi, S. 2003, ApJ, 592, 62 Ponman, T.J., Cannon, T.J. & Navarro, J.F., 1999, Nature, 397, 135 Protassov, R., van Dyk, D.A., Connors, A., Kashyap, V.L. & Siemiginowska, A. 2002, ApJ, 571, 545 Sand, D.J., Treu, T. & Ellis, R.S. 2002, ApJL, 574, L129 Sarazin, C.L. 1988, X-ray Emission from Clusters of Galaxies, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Schmidt, R.W., Allen, S.W. & Fabian, A.C., 2001, MNRAS, 327, Shapiro, P.R. & Iliev, I.T., 2000, ApJL, 542, L1 Smail, I., Ellis, R., Ritchett, M.J. & Edge, A.C. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 1070 277 Spergel, D.N. & Steinhardt, P.J. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 17 Sun, M., Jones, C., Murray, S.S., Allen, S.W., Fabian, A.C. & Edge, A.C. 2003, ApJ, 587, 619 Swaters, R.A., Madore, B.F. & Trewhella, M. 2000, ApJ, 531, L107 Swaters, R.A., Madore, B.F., van den Bosch, F.C. & Balcells, M. Tyson, J.A., Kochanski, G.P. & Dell'Antonio, I.P. 1998, ApJ, 498, 2003, ApJ, 583, 732 L107 van Dyke, D.A., Connors, A., Kashyap, V.L. & Siemiginowska, A. 2001, ApJ, 548, 243 von Mises, R. 1964, Mathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics (New York: Academic Press) Weisskopf, M.C., Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., Garmire, G., Murray, S. & Van Speybroeck, L.P. 2002, PASP, 114, 1 Wu, X.-P. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 299 Wu, K.K.S., Fabian, A.C. & Nulsen, P.E.J., 2000, MNRAS, 318, 889 Zentner, A.R. & Bullock, J.S. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 043003 10 PU (x1 ,x2 ) x1 PC (x1 ,x2 ) x1 x2 x2 unconstrained peak unconstrained peak constrained peak estimate Pest (M) constrained peak P0 (M) Fig. 1. -- Schematic representations of the unconstrained probability distribution function (PU , top), and the constrained distribution (PC , bottom) for a two-dimensional parameter space. The estimated peak of the constrained distribution is shown in blue; the true peak is shown in violet. (For clarity we have not renormalized PC after removing the physically disallowed region of parameter space.) 11 Fig. 2. -- The penalty function g(x) and the associated (approximate) probability distribution function h(x) = e−g(x) for η = 7/2. Here h(x) nearly, but not precisely, normalized; we have set C = 1 (see Equation 13). 12 p a r ameter s p a ce Ms Mc Fig. 3. -- The non-nested relationship between the simple and complex models. The simple model corresponds to the complex model with one of the normalizations set to 0. 13 Fig. 4. -- Empirical F distributions for models Ms and Mc of five simulated data sets. The cold to hot plasma mass ratio, assuming that the two are in pressure equilibrium, is shown for each case, along with the significance of the presence of the cool component as determined through 100 MCMC simulations (see Equation 21). The F value of the original data set is indicated by a vertical dashed line. 14 Fig. 5. -- Baryon density, baryon temperature, spherically enclosed mass, and cylindrically enclosed (projected) mass profiles of A1689, for Nc = 0 (left panels) and Nc = 2 (right panels). The hot plasma is shown in red, the cool component in blue. Arrows represent points which lie outside the ordinate range. Reconstructions adhering to constraint equation 6 are shown as solid black curves. Weak (violet) and strong (green) gravitational lensing measurements are shown for comparison in the bottom panels. (A solid violet line represents an isothermal sphere fit to the weak lensing data set.) See Table 3 for lensing references. 15 Fig. 6. -- Same as Figure 5, for A1795. 16 Fig. 7. -- Same as Figure 5, for A1835. 17 Fig. 8. -- Same as Figure 5, for A2029. 18 Fig. 9. -- Same as Figure 5, for A2104. Note that there is no reconstruction solution in the Nc = 2 case which is consistent with constraint equations 5 and 6. 19 Fig. 10. -- Same as Figure 5, for A2204. 20 Fig. 11. -- Same as Figure 5, for HydraA. Note that there is no reconstruction solution in the Nc = 1 case which is consistent with constraint equations 5 and 6, and that the Hydra A data set did not admit Nc = 2 emission models. 21 Fig. 12. -- Same as Figure 5, for MS1358. 22 Fig. 13. -- Same as Figure 5, for MS2137. 23 Fig. 14. -- Same as Figure 5, for ZW3146. 24 Fig. 15. -- Empirical F distributions and the MCMC significance S of a second cospatial core plasma component for each cluster in the sample. The F value of the original Chandra data set is denoted with a vertical dashed line. (Note that Hydra A data did not admit an Nc = 2 emission model.) 25 Fig. 16. -- Mass profiles for models Nc = 0 (red) and Nc = 2 (blue) of MS1358, overlaid for comparison. Weak (violet) and strong (green) gravitational lensing measurements are shown for comparison. 26 Fig. 17. -- Same as Figure 16, for MS2137. 27 Table 1 Galaxy Cluster Sample cluster z 0.181 A1689 0.0631 A1795 0.2523 A1835 0.0765 A2029 0.1554 A2104 A2204 0.1523 HydraA 0.0522 MS1358 MS2137 ZW3146 0.328 0.313 0.2906 28 Fidelity measures of baryon density (χ2 Table 2 ρ) and temperature (χ2 T ) of each constrained mass profile (see Equation 12), and multiphase core plasma significance S. (Note that Hydra A data did not admit an Nc = 2 emission model.) cluster χ2 ρ (Nc = 0) χ2 T (Nc = 0) χ2 ρ (Nc = 2) χ2 T (Nc = 2) S 0.00150 0.0777 0.00229 0.00774 0.00251 0.000994 A1689 A1795 A1835 A2029 A2104 A2204 HydraA 0.197 MS1358 MS2137 ZW3146 0.00663 0.0101 0.0293 0.467 7.45 1.13 1.17 0.624 0.759 2.43 0.381 1.08 1.25 0.00825 0.0156 1.188 0.00773 0.190 0.00947 -- 0.00454 0.0110 0.0150 1.14 1.29 1.41 1.20 4.51 0.284 -- 0.356 1.38 0.913 0.342 0.823 0.483 0.998 0.661 0.999 -- 0.987 0.271 0.989 29 Lensing comparisons for the very relaxed cluster subset. Table 3 cluster weak lensing strong lensing King, Clowe & Schneider (2002) Wu (2000) Clowe & Schneider (2002) Menard, Erben & Mellier (2003) -- A1689 A1835 A2029 MS1358 Hoekstra et al. (1998) MS2137 -- Allen (1998) Franx et al. (1997); Allen (1998) Sand, Treu & Ellis (2002)
astro-ph/9701182	1	9701	1997-01-23T16:50:31	Driftscan Surveys in the 21cm Line with the Arecibo and Nancay Telescopes	[ "astro-ph" ]	Driftscan methods are highly efficient, stable techniques for conducting extragalactic surveys in the 21cm line of neutral hydrogen. Holding the telescope still while the beam scans the sky at the sidereal rate produces exceptionally stable spectral baselines, increased stability for RFI signals, and excellent diagnostic information about system performance. Data can be processed naturally and efficiently by grouping long sequences of spectra into an image format, thereby allowing thousands of individual spectra to be calibrated, inspected and manipulated as a single data structure with standard tools that already exist in astronomical software. The behavior of spectral standing waves (multi-path effects) can be appraised and excised in this environment, making observations possible while the Sun is up. The method is illustrated with survey data from Arecibo and Nancay.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Driftscan Surveys in the 21cm Line with the Arecibo and Nan¸cay Telescopes F. H. Briggs E. Sorar Kapteyn Astronomical Institute University of Pittsburgh [email protected] [email protected] R. C. Kraan-Korteweg DAEC, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon [email protected] W. van Driel USN, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon [email protected] Abstract Driftscan methods are highly efficient, stable techniques for conducting extragalactic surveys in the 21cm line of neutral hydrogen. Holding the telescope still while the beam scans the sky at the sidereal rate produces exceptionally stable spectral baselines, increased stability for RFI signals, and excellent diagnostic information about system performance. Data can be processed naturally and efficiently by grouping long sequences of spectra into an image format, thereby allowing thousands of individual spectra to be calibrated, inspected and manipulated as a single data structure with standard tools that already exist in astronomical software. The behavior of spectral standing waves (multi-path effects) can be appraised and excised in this environment, making observations possible while the Sun is up. The method is illustrated with survey data from Arecibo and Nan¸cay. Keywords: methods: data analysis - techniques: galaxies: distances and redshifts - radio lines: galaxies image processing - telescopes - surveys - 1 The technique The designs of the Arecibo and Nan¸cay telescopes make them particularly well suited to taking data in a driftscan mode. Both have large collecting areas and are therefore sensitive survey instruments. They obtain the large collecting area by having much of their structure fixed to the ground. When they are used to track specific celestial coordinates, the on-axis gain changes and the far out sidelobes move in unpredictable ways, causing spill-over on the ground and RFI to be time variable. These instabilities increase the level of systematic uncertainties, thus increasing the difficulty of detecting weak signals. Driftscan observations avoid these problems since all components of the structures are fixed relative to the ground, thus achieving the full sensitivity of the large reflecting areas. Similar arguments apply to more conventional radio telescopes, when 1 Figure 1: Nan¸cay Raw Data Image. Passband calibrated spectra have been loaded into the image in time sequence increasing from right to left. There are two slightly overlapping, 6.4 MHz wide spectral bands, as marked at the right border. A trace of the continuum as a function of right ascension is drawn under the image. Figure 2: Processed Nan¸cay images for three declinations. Spectra are loaded in horizontal lines in this image, with right ascension increasing upwards. Overlap of the spectral sub-bands has been removed, and labels on the horizontal axis indicate velocity in km s−1. Eleven detected signals are marked. variation in the spillover causes fluctuations in the spectral baselines and when RFI entering the receiving system is modulated by gain variations in the far sidelobes as the antenna tracks celestial sources. This report is based on experience obtained in extragalactic HI surveys using the Arecibo and Nan¸cay Telescopes. Sorar (1994) and Briggs conducted the Arecibo HI Strip Survey in the driftscan mode in order to determine the HI-mass function for nearby extragalactic objects by surveying long strips at constant declination. The observations covered approximately 6000 independent sightlines to a depth of 7500 km s−1, but since the strips were retraced on many days in order to increase the integration time on each sightline, nearly a million individual spectra had to be calibrated, regrouped and averaged. The details of the observational technique were developed by Sorar (1994), and the results and followup to the survey are summarized by Zwaan et al (1996, these proceedings). The method is also in use for surveys at Nan¸cay. One project, being conducted by Kraan- Korteweg, van Driel, Binggeli, and Briggs, will test the completeness to a depth of 2300 km s−1 of deep optical catalogs of dwarfs and low surface brightness galaxies in the CnV I cloud (Binggeli et al 1990). A sample of the raw data from the HI survey are shown in Figure 1. The spectral passband calibration for this data has been performed by computing the average spectrum of the entire 3.5 hour dataset, and each spectrum was divided by the average spectrum as it was loaded in time sequence into the columns of the image. Passage of a telescope beam over a background continuum source is registered in the image as a dark band. The residual Galactic HI emission causes the splotchy horizontal band across the image around the HI rest frequency. Once the data is loaded in image format, images become the units in which the data is stored, manipulated and displayed. For example, continuum subtraction, averaging of data from different days and smoothing can be accomplished using procedures in familiar astronomical image process- ing packages. Figure 2 shows the processed spectra for a total of ∼2500 sightlines in three adjacent declination strips. The figure results from approximately 82,000 individual spectra. There are 11 detected extragalactic signals resulting from 9 separate galaxies, plus a number of interesting features associated with Galactic HI. A second project now in progress at Nan¸cay will observe ∼6% of the sky to a depth of 4500 km s−1 with noise level ∼23 mJy (5σ) for velocity resolution 20 km s−1. The survey is well matched to detecting nearby examples of gas-rich systems such as HI 1225+01 (Giovanelli & Haynes 1989, Chengalur, Giovanelli & Haynes 1995) and the circum-galactic ring in Leo (Schneider 1989), as well as detecting a sample of several hundred normal galaxies. 2 Figure 3: Schematic of multipath scattering at the Arecibo Telescope. Representative off-axis rays, R1, R2, and R3, are seen traversing paths of different length before arriving at the Arecibo line feed F . In this diagram, R1 takes a direct path to the feed, while R2 and R3 are scattered from different points (S2 and S3) on the support structure. Radiation is actually scattered in many directions at the scattering points S2 and S3, but those rays that are scattered downward parallel to the incoming on-axis rays are directed to be optimally reflected from the main reflector directly toward the feed. 2 Spectral "standing waves" Faint periodic fluctuations in the background noise are visible in the low velocity ranges of each strip in Figure 2. These are commonly called "standing waves" by radio spectroscopists. In these Nan¸cay data, they occur in the correlator quadrants that have strong Galactic HI emission, but not in the higher velocity quadrants. The standing waves arise because Galactic HI signal enters the receiving system by two paths of different length. In an ideal telescope this would not happen, but it is common in the present design of radio telescopes, since radiation entering the radio receiver may have been weakly scattered by structure that crosses the telescope's aperture; this additional scattering can deflect off-axis radiation into the beam of the telescope. When two copies of a signal take different paths to the receiver, the signal taking the longer path suffers a delay, and when the autocorrelation function is computed in the spectrometer, a correlation spike is obtained in the delay channel corresponding to the extra path length. In the Fourier transformation of the ACF to obtain the power spectrum, a single-channel spike transforms to a sinusoidal variation across the band. Thus, the path delay corresponds directly to the number of cycles of standing wave across the spectral band. For the high velocity ranges of Figure 2, there is no interfering signal entering the system with a time delay and with sufficient strength to generate standing waves, and therefore the noise characteristics in this redshift range are better behaved. Any broadband signal entering the receiving system in multiple copies with different delays can give rise to these multipath effects. A strong source of such radiation is the Sun during daytime observations, but terrestrially generated broadband RFI, Galactic emission, strong radio continuum sources and spillover can also do it. The standing waves are often dominated by a single periodicity, representing, for example, a round trip delay between the feed cabin and the dish surface. However, a further complication is that antenna structures are often sufficiently complex that several scatterering locations can contribute (as illustrated for the Arecibo Telescope in Figure 3), producing signals in several delay channels of the ACF. When the Fourier transform is computed, the spectral passband produced by the combination of multiple sinusoidal components can be very complicated. Figure 4 illustrates the complexity of standing wave patterns caused by the Sun in some Arecibo observations made during a late afternoon observation. Note that while the feed was positioned at the same antenna coordinates, this same pattern repeated on successive (solar) days. There was a slow change in the pattern after several days as the Sun moved in declination. As well as varying in amplitude, standing waves can drift in phase with time, causing them to fail to subtract exactly when the simpler forms of passband calibration are applied. This is true of the processing that has been done to obtain Figure 2, and substantial residuals remain in the low velocity range. There is a time range in the observations shown in Figure 4 where the drift is so rapid that the wave moves by a full turn of phase in just a few minutes. Fortunately, there is a straightforward way to tackle this problem and remove even these complicated patterns from the driftscan data in an unbiased way. It begins by performing the Fourier transform of the power 3 Figure 4: Arecibo daytime standing waves. Left. The data image for a single circular polarization after the standard calibration and continuum removal. The image contains 1250 seven second time steps for a duration of ∼2.4 hours. The bright, spatially resolved galaxy M94 can be seen midway through the image in the low velocity range. There is a faint linear feature running vertically in the image at slightly lower velocity -- this is Galactic HI emission that is aliased into the spectrum through the baseband filters. Right. Harmonic content of each row in the image for first 63 harmonics. The amplitudes have been averaged by 4 time steps in this image. spectrum Sti(ν) to obtain the amplitudes and phases of the standing wave components during each time step ti. These harmonics can be written as complex coefficients An,ti = An,ti exp(iφn,ti), where n labels the harmonic by the number of full periods of the wave across the spectral band and ti indicates that the coefficients are expected to change with time, as the spectra are recorded in discrete time steps. In principle, the Fourier analysis of a string of real numbers, such as these spectra, produces one half as many complex harmonic coefficients as there were spectral channels in the power spectrum, but, in practice, the standing waves arise from significant signal only at low values of n. Thus, the standing wave content of an image-formatted database can be described by another "image" (or table) of complex numbers, with the same number of time steps, but many fewer values for An than are required for the number of channels in the spectrum S(ν). Figure 4 shows the time behavior of the harmonic content of the first 63 harmonics in the Arecibo data image in the left part of the figure. The standing waves appear with a variety of periodicities, with several long-lived bursts in the harmonics around n = 20, which corresponds to differential delays ∼1µsec, the round-trip light travel time between the Arecibo feed support structure and the surface of the reflector. There is substantial variability depending on where the scatterer is located on the support structure. There are also some bursts of signal in the lowest harmonics, possibly due to differential delays between scattered paths such as R3 and R2 in Figure 3, which are both scattered downward into the dish from different points on the support structure; alternatively, there could be scattering from point S2 directly in the direction of the feed F , which would also cause a fairly short differential delay and thus a long period standing wave. The harmonic signature of a bright galaxy can also be seen near the midpoint of the data set. The faint, periodic, horizontal striping is a result of the slightly variable correlator dump time, causing the record integration time to beat with the 7 second grid spacing to which the data was interpolated. Phase drift of an n harmonic standing wave is described by watching the phase term φn(t) from An,ti vary with time. Figure 5 shows an example of the amplitude and phase data for a single harmonic n = 15. The time variation of both An(t) and φn(t) can be efficiently tracked in time by sliding a window of 16 to 128 time steps along the table of An,ti and then taking the Fourier transform of the complex time series of each harmonic within the windowed region. A recipe for tracking and modeling a standing wave is summarized as follows: (1) Compute the table (or image) of complex harmonic coefficients An,ti (2) Separate the complex coefficients of the nth harmonic as a function of time into a single long vector (such as the data plotted in Figure 5). (3) Subdivide the vector into short enough time spans that the rate of drift is nearly constant over that time window. The choice of length for the time window depends on how rapidly the rate of drift changes, since the window must be short enough to track changes in the drift rate but also long enough to be immune to signals that are localized in a single beam. Of course, a choice for the window length of 2N time steps (with N equal to an integer in the range 4 to 7) helps to increase the efficiency in computing the transform. 4 (4) The phase interpolation needed to track the waves is simplified if there is overlap of the windows, and therefore the window was advanced by either 2N −1 or 2N −2 time steps before recom- puting the transform. Thus, a mathematical summary is: each window contains p = 2N points taken from An,ti with ti running from tm to tm+p−1. The Fourier transform of this series of p numbers produces p complex coefficients an,δk = an,δk exp (iθn,δk). Here an,δk is the strength of the component drifting at rate δk with phase θn,δk at time tw = tm+p/2. In principle, there may be well be a range of different standing wave drift rates δ contributing at any given time, since many locations on the support structure are capable of scattering. In practice, for each window, we tabulated a δS and a θn,δS corresponding to the δk and θn,δk of the strongest an,δk component in each time window, after checking for significance relative to the noise level. (5) Depending of the degree of overlap of the windows, each time step ti falls in either 2 or 4 windows. Each window that produced valid measurements for δS and θn,δS can be used to form an estimate of the standing wave phase at ti. Thus, a reasonable method for tracking the phase for the nth harmonic is to compute an estimate < φn,ti > for the phase at each time from the weighted vector average of the overlapping windows: ηe(i<φn,ti >) = hX Wn,w(ti − tw)ρe(i(δS,w(ti−tw)+θn,δS ,w)i / X Wn,w(ti − tw)ρ The sums are taken over the 2 (or 4) windows that overlap at ti. The weighting factors include Wn,w, which indicates the statistical significance of the solution for the window w, and a factor (ti − tw)ρ, which gradually transfers the weight among the windows by assigning the greatest emphasis to the solution whose window is centered closest to ti. The factor ρ is one of many possible weight adjustments. An amplitude η also results from the vector average; η is close to unity when there is close agreement between the phase determined by all the windows included in the average. (6) Once a solution for phase tracking has been performed (such as shown in the lower panel of Figure 5), a model for the temporal behavior of the wave amplitudes can be made by smoothing the time sequence of An,ti exp(i(φn,ti− < φn,ti >)). When the resulting wave amplitudes surpass a set threshold for significance, they can be stored in a table of harmonic coefficients that can subsequently be used to generate models for the standing waves as a function of time (as shown in Figure 6) and then correct the observations by subtracting the standing wave model from the data image. Note that this technique succeeds at doing little damage to the celestial signals, since galaxies typically fall in only one beam and the fits are derived from many beams. This approach is far superior to simply "nulling" the An component, since this would throw away genuine information from the sky that is specific to each beam. While our experience at Arecibo and Nancay has shown that the strongest standing waves are due to the sun, we have also seen similar, but weaker, standing waves at night at Arecibo when observing in the vicinity of the strong radio source Taurus A (the Crab Nebula); in this case, the pattern repeated at the same sidereal time day after day. Very strong standing waves have also been generated by faulty equipment that generated intermittent, broadband noise; these waves had fixed phase in successive scans, since the source of the rfi was fixed to the Earth and the antenna was stationary during the observation. 3 Final Comments The driftscan technique for spectral line surveying offers a number of advantages over pointed observations: (1) Data quality is maximized since the telescope is still relative to the ground; spillover, far sidelobes and on-axis gain are constant. (2) System stability can be monitored with 5 e d u t i l p m A ] g e d [ e s a h P Figure 5: Amplitude and phase for the n = 15 harmonic standing wave. Top panel. Coefficient amplitudes plotted as a function of time step (light noisy curve). The heavy solid points are vector averages of the amplitude (for 20 time steps), computed after application of the phase tracking algorithm. Heavy points are plotted only when the amplitude surpasses a set threshold. Bottom panel. Standing wave phases (points). Smooth interpolated curve results from the phase tracking algorithm. The curve is lighter in regions where the signal to noise ratio for the wave is low. Figure 6: Standing wave edits. Left panels. Versions of the data image in Figure 4, but with standing wave models subtracted. The data images are presented on the same grayscale wedge as Figure 4. Right panels. Standing wave models built from harmonic analysis of the data image in Figure 4, followed by application of a phase tracking algorithm and reconstruction of a noise-free images of the standing waves. The upper model includes harmonics n = 4 through 25, when they are deemed significant. The lower model includes n = 1 through 25. The grayscale is about 3× more sensitive for the models than for the data images. 6 high precision. (3) The observations are 100 percent efficient since data can be taken continuously. (4) The telescope scheduling is simple, and observing staff has little real-time responsibility, since the telescope is sitting still with the brakes on. (5) Spectral passband fluctuations due to standing waves (or any other instability that varies on time scales longer than a few minutes) can be tracked and removed, permitting observations to be made during the daytime. (6) The data is naturally processed in image-format; the analysis is very simple and efficient, and allows large projects to be tackled using existing software, which is proven and familiar. Acknowledgments We are grateful to the telescope staffs at Arecibo and Nan¸cay for their assistance with the obser- vations. The Nan¸cay radio observatory is operated by the Observatoire de Paris and associated as USR B704 to the French Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), with financial support of the Region Centre. The Arecibo Observatory is part of the National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, which is operated by Cornell University under agreement with the U.S. Na- tional Science Foundation. The research by RCKK is being supported with an EC-grant. The Arecibo HI Strip Survey received extensive support through NSF Grant AST 91-19930. Binggeli, B., Tarenghi, M, & Sandage, A. 1990, A&A, 228, 42 Briggs, F.H. 1996, this volume Chengalur, J.N., Giovanelli, R., & Haynes, M.P. 1995, AJ, 109, 2415 Giovanelli, R., & Haynes, M.P. 1989, Ap.J., 346, L5 Schneider, S.E. 1989, Ap.J., 343, 94 Sorar, E. 1994, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh Zwaan, M., Sprayberry, D., & Briggs, F.H. 1996, this volume. 7 This figure "figure1.jpg" is available in "jpg"(cid:10) format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9701182v1 This figure "figure2.jpg" is available in "jpg"(cid:10) format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9701182v1 This figure "figure3.gif" is available in "gif"(cid:10) format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9701182v1 This figure "figure4.jpg" is available in "jpg"(cid:10) format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9701182v1 This figure "figure6.jpg" is available in "jpg"(cid:10) format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/astro-ph/9701182v1
astro-ph/0410526	1	0410	2004-10-22T01:03:44	From the Earliest Seeds to Today's Supermassive Black Holes	[ "astro-ph" ]	I review scenarios for the assembly of supermassive black holes (MBHs) at the center of galaxies that trace their hierarchical build-up far up in the dark matter halo "merger tree". Monte Carlo realizations of the merger hierarchy in a LCDM cosmology, coupled to semi-analytical recipes, are a powerful tool to follow the merger history of halos and the dynamics and growth of the MBHs they host. X-ray photons from miniquasars powered by intermediate-mass "seed" holes may permeate the universe more uniformly than EUV radiation, make the low-density diffuse intergalactic medium warm and weakly ionized prior to the epoch of reionization breakthrough, and set an entropy floor. The spin distribution of MBHs is determined by gas accretion, and is predicted to be heavily skewed towards fast-rotating Kerr holes, to be already in place at early epochs, and not to change significantly below redshift 5. Decaying MBH binaries may shape the innermost central regions of galaxies and should be detected in significant numbers by LISA.	astro-ph	astro-ph	From the earliest seeds to today's supermassive black holes Piero Madau Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz CA 95064, USA Abstract. I review scenarios for the assembly of supermassive black holes (MBHs) at the center of galaxies that trace their hierarchical build-up far up in the dark mat- ter halo "merger tree". Monte Carlo realizations of the merger hierarchy in a ΛCDM cosmology, coupled to semi-analytical recipes, are a powerful tool to follow the merger history of halos and the dynamics and growth of the MBHs they host. X-ray photons from miniquasars powered by intermediate-mass "seed" holes may permeate the uni- verse more uniformly than EUV radiation, make the low-density diffuse intergalactic medium warm and weakly ionized prior to the epoch of reionization breakthrough, and set an entropy floor. The spin distribution of MBHs is determined by gas accretion, and is predicted to be heavily skewed towards fast-rotating Kerr holes, already in place at early epochs, and not to change significantly below redshift 5. Decaying MBH bi- naries may shape the innermost central regions of galaxies and should be detected in significant numbers by LISA. 1 Massive black holes and galaxy formation The strong link observed between the masses of supermassive black holes (MBHs) at the center of most galaxies and the gravitational potential wells that host them suggests a fundamental mechanism for assembling black holes and forming spheroids in galaxy halos. The mBH-σ relation [12] [16] implies a rough pro- portionality between MBH mass and the mass of the baryonic component of the bulge. It is not yet understood whether this relation was set in primordial structures, and consequently how it is maintained throughout cosmic time with such a small dispersion, or indeed which physical processes established such a correlation in the first place [48][18][6]. In cosmologies dominated by cold dark matter (CDM) galaxy halos experi- ence multiple mergers during their lifetime, with those between comparable-mass systems ("major mergers") expected to result in the formation of elliptical galax- ies [21]. Simple models in which MBHs are also assumed to grow during major mergers and to be present in every galaxy at any redshift -- while only a frac- tion of them is "active" at any given time -- have been shown to explain many aspects of the observed evolution of quasars [7][8][25]. The coevolution of MBHs and their host galaxies in hierarchical structure formation scenarios gives origin to a number of of important questions, most notably: • Did the first MBHs form in subgalactic units far up in the merger hierarchy, well before the bulk of the stars observed today? The seeds of the z ∼ 6 quasars black holes with masses ∼ > a few hundred M⊙ [9][24]. 2 Piero Madau discovered in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey had to appear at very high redshift, > 10, if they are accreting no faster than the Eddington rate. In hierarchical z ∼ cosmologies, the ubiquity of MBHs in nearby luminous galaxies can arise even if only a small fraction of halos harbor MBHs at very high redshift [32]. • How massive were the initial seeds, and is there a population of relic pre- galactic MBHs lurking in present-day galaxy halos? A clue to these questions may lie in the numerous population of ultraluminous off-nuclear ("non-AGN") X-ray sources that have been detected in nearby galaxies [34]. Assuming isotropic emission, the inferred masses of these "ULXs" may suggest intermediate-mass • Can coalescing MBH binaries at very high redshift be detected in signif- icant numbers by the planned Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA)? If MBHs were common in the past (as implied by the notion that many distant galaxies harbor active nuclei for a short period of their life), and if their host galaxies undergo multiple mergers, then MBH binaries will inevitably form in large numbers during cosmic history. MBH pairs that are able to coalesce in less than a Hubble time will give origin to the loudest gravitational wave events in the universe. • If was first proposed by [10] that the heating of the surrounding stars by a decaying MBH pair would create a low-density core out of a preexisting cuspy (e.g. ρ∗ ∝ r−2) stellar density profile. If stellar dynamical processes can efficiently drive wide MBH binaries to the gravitational wave (GW) emission stage, what is the cumulative dynamical effect of multiple black hole mergers on galaxy stellar cusps? ionized at z ∼ • Active galactic nuclei powered by supermassive holes keep the universe < 4, structure the intergalactic medium (IGM), and probably regu- late star formation in their host galaxies. Intermediate-mass holes accreting gas from the surrounding medium may shine as "miniquasars" at redshifts as high as z ∼ 20. What is the thermodynamic effect of miniquasars on the IGM at early times? • Besides their masses, astrophysical black holes are completely characterized by their spins, S = aGmBH/c, 0 ≤ a/mBH ≤ 1. The spin of a MBH is expected to have a significant effect on its observational manifestation, such as the efficiency of converting accreted mass into radiation and the existence and direction of jets in active nuclei. What is the expected distribution of MBH spins and how does this evolve with cosmic time? In this talk I will review some recent developments in our understanding of the assembly, growth, emission history, and environmental impact of MBHs from early epochs to the present. Unless otherwise stated, all the results shown below refer to the currently favoured (by a variety of observations) ΛCDM world model with ΩM = 0.3, ΩΛ = 0.7, h = 0.7, Ωb = 0.045, σ8 = 0.93, and n = 1. Earliest seed MBHs 3 2 MBHs as Population III remnants The first stars in the universe must have formed out of metal-free gas, in dark > 5 × 105 M⊙ [14] condensing from the high-σ matter "minihalos" of total mass ∼ peaks of the primordial density field at redshift z = 20 − 30. Numerical sim- ulations of the fragmentation of primordial clouds in standard CDM theories all show the formation of Jeans unstable clumps with masses exceeding a few hundred solar masses; because of the slow subsonic contraction -- a regime set up by the main gas coolant, molecular hydrogen -- further fragmentation into sub-components is not seen, and a single very massive star forms from the inside out [5][1][41]. Fig. 1. Mass function of minihalos of mass M formed at z = 15, 20, 25 which, by the later time z0, will have merged into a more massive halo of total mass M0. Solid curves: z0 = 0.8, M0 = 1012 h−1 M⊙ ("Milky Way" halo). Dashed curves: z0 = 3.5, M0 = 2 × 1011 h−1 M⊙ (older "bulge"). If only one seed hole formed in each ∼ 106 M⊙ minihalo collapsing at z ∼ 20 (and triple hole interactions and binary coalescences were neglected), several thousands relic IMBHs and their descendants would be orbiting throughout present-day galaxy halos [29][23]. At zero metallicity mass loss through radiatively-driven stellar winds or nuclear-powered stellar pulsations is expected to be negligible, and Population III stars will likely die losing only a small fraction of their mass (except for 100 < m∗ < 140 M⊙). Nonrotating very massive stars in the mass window < 260 M⊙ will disappear as pair-instability supernovae [4], leaving no compact remnants and polluting the universe with the first heavy elements [44][40]. Stars with 40 < m∗ < 140 M⊙ and m∗ > 260 M⊙ are predicted in- stead to collapse to black holes with masses exceeding half of the initial stellar < m∗ ∼ 140 ∼ 4 Piero Madau mass [20]. Barring any fine tuning of the initial mass function of Pop III stars, intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) -- with masses above the 4 -- 18 M⊙ range of known "stellar-mass" holes -- may then be the inevitable endproduct of the first episodes of pregalactic star formation [29]. Since they form in high-σ rare density peaks, relic IMBHs are expected to cluster in the bulges of present-day galaxies as they become incorporated through a series of mergers into larger and larger systems (see Fig. 1). The presence of a small cluster of IMBHs in galaxy nuclei may have several interesting consequences associated with tidal captures of ordinary stars (likely followed by disruption), capture by the central supermassive hole, and gravitational wave radiation from such coalescences [33]. Accreting pregalactic IMBHs may be detectable as ultra-luminous, off-nuclear X-ray sources [29][26]. 3 The first miniquasars Physical conditions in the central potential wells of young and gas-rich proto- galaxies may have been propitious for black hole gas accretion. Perhaps seed black holes grew efficiently in small minihalos just above the cosmological Jeans mass (with shallow potential wells), or maybe gas accretion had to await the buildup of more massive galaxies (with virial temperatures above the thresh- old for atomic cooling). This issue is important for the detectability of high-z miniquasars: it also determines whether the radiation background at very high redshifts had an X-ray component component able to preheat and partially ionize the IGM. As mentioned above, gas condensation in the first baryonic objects is possible through the formation of H2 molecules, which cool via roto-vibrational transi- tions down to temperatures of a few hundred kelvins. In the absence of a UV photodissociating flux and of ionizing X-ray radiation, three-dimensional sim- ulations of early structure formation show that the fraction of cold, dense gas available for accretion onto seed holes or star formation exceeds 20% for halos more massive than 106 M⊙ [28]. On th eother hand, a zero-metallicity progenitor star in the range 40 < m∗ < 500 M⊙ emits about 70,000 photons above 1 ryd per stellar baryon [43]. The ensuing ionization front will completely overrun the host halo, photoevaporating most of the surrounding gas [54]. Black hole remnants of the first stars that created H II regions are then unlikely to accrete significant mass until new cold material will be made available through the hierarchical merging of many gaseous subunits. Accretion onto IMBHs may be an attractive way to (partially) reionize the low-density IGM [30][42]. A large fraction of the UV radiation from massive stars may not escape the dense sites of star formation, or may be deposited locally in halo gas that recombines almost immediately. The harder radiation emitted from miniquasars is instead more likely to escape from the hosts into intergalactic space, and may then produce more 'durable' (albeit partial) ion- ization in the diffuse IGM. High-resolution hydrodynamics simulations of early structure formation in ΛCDM cosmologies are a powerful tool to track in de- Earliest seed MBHs 5 tail the thermal and ionization history of a clumpy IGM and guide studies of early reheating. We [27] have used Enzo, an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR), grid-based hybrid (hydro+N-body) code developed by Bryan & Norman (see http://cosmos.ucsd.edu/enzo/) to solve the cosmological hydrodynamics equa- tions and simulate the effect of a miniquasar turning on at very high redshift in a volume 1 Mpc on a side (comoving). We first identify in a low-resolution pure N-body simulation the Lagrangian volume of a resolved protogalactic halo with a total mass 7× 105 M⊙ at z = 25, above the cosmological Jeans mass. We then generate new initial conditions with an 1283 initial static grid that covers a 0.5 Mpc volume centered around the identified high-σ peak. During the evolution, refined grids (for a maximum of 5 additional levels) are introduced with twice the spatial resolution of the parent (coarser) grid to home in, with progressively finer resolution, on the densest parts of the "cosmic web". The simulation follows the non-equilibrium chemistry of the dominant nine species (H, H+, H−, e, He, He+, He++, H2, and H+ 2 ) in primordial gas, and includes radiative losses from atomic and molecular line cooling. Fig. 2. Gas distribution (at overdensity 2) in the inner 0.5 Mpc of the simulation box at z = 15.5. Dark matter halos of different masses (identified with a halo-finder algorithm) are plotted as dark spheres. At z = 21, a miniquasar powered by a 150 M⊙ black hole accreting at the Eddington rate is turned on in the protogalactic halo. The miniquasar shines for a few Salpeter times (i.e. down to z ∼ 15) and is a copious source of soft X-ray photons, which permeate the IGM more uniformly than possible with ex- treme ultraviolet (EUV, ≥ 13.6 eV) radiation [38] and make it warm and weakly ionized prior to the epoch of reionization breakthrough [50]. A spectrum with ν Lν = const (like the nonthermal component observed in ULXs) was assumed for photons with energies in the range 0.2-10 keV, to which the simulation box is 6 Piero Madau transparent. X-rays alone do not produce a fully ionized medium, but partially photoionize the gas by repeated secondary ionizations. A primary nonthermal photoelectron of energy E = 1 keV in a medium with residual ionization (from the recombination epoch) x = 2 × 10−4 will create over two dozens secondary electrons, depositing a fraction fion ≈ 37% of its initial energy as secondary ionizations of hydrogen, and only fheat ≈ 13% as heat [47]. The timescale for electron-electron encounters resulting in a fractional energy loss f = ∆E/E, tee ≈ 140 yr Ef (cid:18) 1 + z 20 (cid:19)−3 (cid:18) ln Λ 20 (cid:19)−1 x−1 (1) (where E is measured in keV), is typically much shorter that the electron Compton cooling timescale off cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons, tC = (7 × 106 yr) [(1 + z)/20]−4, and thus the primary photoelectron will ionize and heat the surrounding medium before it is cooled by the CMB. Once the IGM ionized fraction increases to x ≈ 0.1, the number of secondary ionizations per ionizing photon drops to a few, and the bulk of the primary's energy goes into heat (fheat ≈ 0.6) via elastic Coulomb collisions with thermal electrons. Fig. 3. Mass (upper curves) and volume (lower curves) weighted ]gas fraction vs. gas temperature in the simulation box. A miniquasar was turned on at z = 21. Figure 3 shows the mass and volume-weighted gas fraction in the simulation box vs. temperature as four different redshifts. The heating effect of X-rays from the miniquasar is clearly seen, with gas temperatures between 103 and 104 K at z < 20. Strong Jeans mass filtering takes place, and subsequent minihalos will no longer be able to accrete gas due to the smoothing effect of gas pressure. The low-density IGM acquires a uniform "entropy floor" [39] that (a) greatly reduces gas clumping, curtailing the number of photons needed to maintain reionization, and (b) results in significantly lower gas densities in the cores of minihalos that suppress rapid H2 formation. The latter effect may imply that X-rays inhibit rather than enhance star formation [19][28]. Earliest seed MBHs 7 4 MBH binaries and galaxy cores Frequent galaxy mergers will inevitably lead to the formation of MBH binaries. As dark matter halos assemble, MBHs get incorporated into larger and larger halos, sink to the center owing to dynamical friction, accrete a fraction of the gas in the merger remnant to become supermassive, form a binary system, and eventually coalesce [3]. In a stellar background a "hard" binary shrinks by cap- turing the stars that pass close to the holes and ejecting them at much higher velocities, a super-elastic scattering process that depletes the nuclear region and turns a stellar "cusp" into a low-density core. Rapid coalescence eventually en- sues due to the emission of gravitational radiation. Observationally, there is clear evidence in early-type galaxies for a systematic trend in the distribution of sur- face brightness profiles, with faint ellipticals showing steep power-law profiles (cusps), while bright ellipticals have much shallower stellar cores [11]. Detailed N-body simulations have confirmed the cusp-disruption effect of a hardening MBH binary [35], but have shed little light on why bright ellipticals have lower central concentrations than faint ellipticals. Fig. 4. Mass deficit produced at z = 0 by shrinking MBHs in our merger tree as a func- tion of nuclear MBH mass (filled dots). Left panel: cusp regeneration case. Right panel: core preservation case. Galaxies without a core (i.e. those that have never experienced a MBH-MBH merger or with their cusp recently regenerated) are shown as vertical arrows at an arbitrary mass deficit of 106 M⊙. Empty squares: mass deficit inferred in a sample of galaxies by [36]. Empty circles: same for the "core" galaxies of [11]. Empty triangles: same for the "cuspy" galaxies of [11], assuming a flat core within the upper limit on the core size. (From [52].) 8 Piero Madau shrink the binary down to a separation ∼ The role of MBH binaries in shaping the central structure of galaxies is best understood within the framework of a detailed model for the hierarchical assem- bly of MBHs over cosmic history [51]. Stellar cusps can be efficiently destroyed over cosmic time by decaying binaries if stellar dynamical processes are able to < 10% of the separation at which the binary becomes hard. More massive halos have more massive nuclear holes and experience more merging events than less massive galaxies: hence they suffer more from the eroding action of binary MBHs and have larger cores. In [52] we found that a model in which the effect of the hierarchy of MBH interactions is cu- mulative and cores are preserved during galaxy mergers produces at the present epoch a correlation between the "mass deficit" (the mass needed to bring a flat inner density profile to a r−2 cusp) and the mass of the nuclear MBH, with a normalization and slope comparable to the observed relation (see Fig. 4). Mod- els in which the mass displaced by the MBH binary is replenished after every major galaxy merger appear instead to underestimate the mass deficit observed in "core" galaxies. In [52] a simple scheme was applied to hardening pairs, in which the "loss cone" is constantly refilled and a constant density core forms due to the ejection of stellar mass. The effect of loss-cone depletion (the depletion of low-angular momentum stars that get close enough to extract energy from a hard binary) is one of the major uncertainties in computing the decay timescale, and makes it difficult to construct detailed scenarios for coalescing black hole binaries. Fig. 5. Number of MBH binary coalescences observed per year at z = 0, per unit red- shift, in different mBH = M1 + M2 mass intervals. Each panel also lists the integrated event rate, dN/dt, predicted by [45]. The rates (solid lines) are compared to a case in which triple black hole interactions are switched off (dotted lines). Triple hole interac- tions increase the coalescence rate at very high redshifts, while, for 10 < z < 15, the rate is decreased because of the reduced number of surviving binaries. Dashed lines: rates computed assuming binary hardening is instantaneous, i.e. MBHs coalesce after a dynamical friction timescale. Earliest seed MBHs 9 5 Gravitational radiation from inspiraling MBH binaries MBH binaries, with masses in the range 103 − 107 M⊙, are one of the primary target for LISA [17][55][45]. Interferometers operate as all-sky monitors, and the data streams collect the contributions from a large number of sources belonging to different cosmic populations. To optimize the subtraction of resolved sources from the data stream, it is important to have a detailed description of the ex- pected rate, duration, amplitude, and waveforms of events. Figure 5 shows the number of MBH binary coalescences per unit redshift per unit observed year predicted by [45], using a detailed model of MBH binaries dynamics. The ob- served event rate is obtained by dividing the rate per unit proper time by the (1 + z) cosmological time dilation factor. Each panel shows the rate for differ- ent mBH = M1 + M2 mass intervals, and lists the integrated event rate, dN/dt, across the entire sky. The number of events per observed year per unit redshift peaks at z = 2 for 107 < mBH < 109 M⊙, at z = 3− 4 for 105 < mBH < 107 M⊙, and at z = 10 for mBH < 105 M⊙, i.e. the lower the black hole mass, the higher the peak redshift. Beyond the peak, the event rate decreases steeply with cosmic time. In the stationary case, i.e., assuming no orbital decay, the GW emission spectrum of a MBH pair in a circular orbit of radius a is a delta function at rest-frame frequency fr = ω/π, where ω = pG(M1 + M2)/a3 is the Keplerian angular frequency of the binary. Orbital decay due to GW emission results in a shift of the emitted frequency to increasingly larger values as the binary evolution proceeds. Typically, the timescale for frequency shift is long compared to the wave period, and short compared to the duration of the observation. Only close to the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO), the GW frequency changes at a rate comparable to the frequency itself. The rest-frame energy flux (energy per unit area per unit time) associated to the GW is dE dAdt = π 4 c3 G r h2, f 2 (2) where the strain amplitude (sky-and-polarisation averaged) at comoving distance r(z) is h = 8π2/3 101/2 G5/3M5/3 c4r(z) f 2/3 r , (3) M is the "chirp mass" of the binary, and all the other symbols have their stan- dard meaning. The strain is averaged over a wave period. The important quan- tity to consider is the number of cycles n spent in a frequency interval ∆f ≃ f around a given frequency f . In general, n = f 2/ f ∝ f −5/3. For a periodic signal 10 Piero Madau at frequency f lasting for a time interval longer than the observation time τ , we have simply n = f τ . The characteristic strain in an observation of (observed) duration τ is then where f = fr/(1 + z) is the observed frequency. In Figure 6 hc is plotted for dif- ferent MBH binaries at different redshifts, compared to the LISA hrms multiplied by a factor of 5, assuming a 3-year observation. and r , hc = h√n ∝ f −1/6 hc = hpf τ ∝ f 7/6 r n < f τ, , n > f τ, (4) (5) Fig. 6. Characteristic strain hc for MBH binaries with different masses and redshifts. From top to bottom, the first three curves refer to systems with log(M1/ M⊙) = 7, 6, 5, respectively, and M2 = 0.1M1. The solid, long-dashed, and short-dashed lines assumes the binary at z = 1, 3, 5, respectively. A 3-year observation is considered. The lowest solid curve assumes an equal mass binary M1 = M2 = 103 M⊙ at z = 7. The small diamonds on each curve mark, from left to right, the observed frequency at 1 year, 1 month and 1 day before coalescence. The thick curve is LISA 5hrms, approximatively the threshold for detection with S/N ≥ 5. (From [46]). At frequencies higher than the "knee", the time spent around a given fre- quency is less than 3 years, and hc ∝ f −1/6. The signal shifts toward higher frequency during the observation, and reaches the ISCO and the coalescence phase in most cases. The lowest curve represents a low mass, high redshift equal mass binary. In terms of their detectability by LISA, they represent a somewhat different class of events. Contrary to the case of more massive binaries present at lower z, the final coalescence phase of light binaries lies at too high freque- cies, well below the LISA threshold. For frequencies much below the knee, the characteristic strain is proportional to f 7/6, as the timescale for frequency shift Earliest seed MBHs 11 is longer than 3 years. The signal amplitude is then limited by the observation time, not by the intrinsic properties of the source. The source will be observed as a "stationary source", a quasi-monochromatic wave for the whole duration of the observation. An increase in the observation time will result in a shift of the knee toward lower frequencies. The time needed for the sources to reach the ISCO starting from the knee frequency is, approximatively, the observing time. As recently shown by [46], the GW signal from MBH binaries will be resolved (assuming a 3-year LISA observation) into ∼ 100 discrete events, 40 of which will be observed above threshold until coalescence. These "merging events" involve < 6. relatively massive binaries, M ∼ 105 M⊙, in the redshift range 2 ∼ The remaining ∼ 60 events come from higher redshift, less massive binaries > 6) and, although their S/N integrated over the duration (M ∼ 5×103 M⊙ at z ∼ of the observation can be substantial, the final coalescence phase is at too high frequency to be directly observable by LISA. The total number of detected events > 90% of all coalescences of massive black hole binaries at accounts for a fraction ∼ < 5. The residual confusion noise from unresolved massive black hole binaries z ∼ is expected to be at least an order of magnitude below the estimated stochastic LISA noise. < z ∼ 6 MBH spins The spin of a MBH is determined by the competition between a number of physical processes. Black holes forming from the gravitational collapse of very massive stars endowed with rotation will in general be born with non-zero spin [13]. An initially non-rotating hole that increases its mass by (say) 50% by swal- lowing material from an accretion disk may be spun up to a/mBH = 0.84 [2]. While the coalescence of two non-spinning black holes of comparable mass will > 0.8 [15], the capture of smaller companions in randomly-oriented orbits may spin down a Kerr hole instead [22]. immediately drive the spin parameter of the merged hole to a/mBH ∼ 12 Piero Madau Fig. 7. Normalized distribution of mass ratios, q = M2/M1, of coalescing MBH binaries at three different epochs. Note that at low redshift MBHs typically capture much smaller companions. In [53] we have made a first attempt at estimating the distribution of MBH spins and its evolution with cosmic time in the context of hierarchical structure formation theories, following the combined effects of black hole-black hole coa- lescences and accretion from a gaseous disk on the magnitude and orientation of MBH spins. Here I will briefly summarize our findings. Binary coalescences ap- pear to cause no significant systematic spin-up or spin-down of MBHs: because of the relatively flat distribution of MBH binary mass ratios in hierarchical mod- els (shown in Fig. 7), the holes random-walk around the spin parameter they are endowed with at birth, and the spin distribution retains significant memory of the initial rotation of "seed" holes. It is accretion, not binary coalescences, that dominates the spin evolution of MBHs (Fig. 8). Accretion can lead to efficient spin-up of MBHs even if the angular momentum of the inflowing material varies in time. This is because, for a thin accretion disk, the hole is aligned with the outer disk on a timescale that is much shorter than the Salpeter time [37], leading to accretion via prograde equatorial orbits. As a result, most of the mass accreted by the hole acts to spin it up, even if the orientation of the spin axis changes in time. For a geometrically thick disk, alignment of the hole with the outer disk is much less efficient, occur- ring on a timescale comparable to the Salpeter time. Even in this case most holes will be rotating rapidly. This is because, in any model in which MBH growth is triggered by major mergers, every accretion episode must typically increase a hole's mass by about one e-folding to account for the local MBH mass density and the mBH − σ∗ relation. Most individual accretion episodes thus produce rapidly-rotating holes independent of the initial spin. Earliest seed MBHs 13 Fig. 8. Distribution of MBH spins in different redshift intervals. Left panel: effect of black hole binary coalescences only. Solid histogram: seed holes are born with a ≡ a/mBH = 0.6. Dashed histogram: seed holes are born non-spinning. Right panel: spin distribution from binary coalescences and gas accretion. Seed holes are born with a = 0.6, and are efficiently spun up by accretion via a thin disk. Under the combined effects of accretion and binary coalescences, we find that the spin distribution is heavily skewed towards fast-rotating Kerr holes, is already in place at early epochs, and does not change significantly below redshift 5. As shown in Figure 9, about 70% of all MBHs are maximally rotating and have mass-to-energy conversion efficiencies approaching 30%. Note that if the equilibrium spin attained by accreting MBHs is lower than the value of a ≡ a/mBH = 0.998 used here, as in the thick disk MHD simulations of [15], where a ≈ 0.93, then the accretion efficiency will be lower as well, ≈ 17%. 14 Piero Madau Fig. 9. Distribution of accretion efficiencies, ǫ ≡ 1 − E, in different redshift intervals (assuming that the energy radiated is the binding energy at the ISCO). The spin distribution from binary coalescences and gas accretion has been calculated assuming the holes accrete via a thin disk on prograde equatorial orbits. Even in the conservative case where accretion is via a geometrically thick disk (and hence the spin/disk alignment is relatively inefficient) and the initial orientation between the hole's spin and the disk rotation axis is assumed to be random, we find that most MBHs rotate rapidly with spin parameters a > 0.8 and accretion efficiencies ǫ >12%. As recently shown by [56][31], a direct com- parison between the local MBH mass density and the mass density accreted by luminous quasars shows that quasars have a mass-to-energy conversion efficiency > 0.1 (a simple and elegant argument originally provided by [49]). This high ǫ ∼ average accretion efficiency may suggest rapidly rotating Kerr holes, in agree- ment with our findings. Since most holes rotate rapidly at all epochs, our results suggest that spin is not a necessary and sufficient condition for producing a radio-loud quasar. I would like to thank my numerous collaborators on this subject: F. Haardt, M. Kuhlen, P. Oh, E. Quataert, M. Rees, A. Sesana, and M. Volonteri. This manuscript was written while the author was enjoying the hospitality of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics. Support for this work was provided by NASA grant NNG04GK85G, and by NSF grants AST-0205738 and PHY99-07949. References 1. Abel, T., Bryan, G., & Norman, M. 2000, ApJ, 540, 39 Earliest seed MBHs 15 2. Bardeen, J. M. 1970, Nature, 226, 64 3. Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. 1980, Nature, 287, 307 4. Bond, J. R., Arnett, W. D., & Carr, B. J. 1984, ApJ, 280, 825 5. Bromm, V., Coppi, P. S., & Larson, R. B. 1999, ApJ, 527, L5 6. Burkert, A., & Silk, J. 2001, ApJ, 554, L151 7. Cattaneo, A., Haehnelt, M. G., & Rees, M. J. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 77 8. Cavaliere, A., & Vittorini, V. 2000, ApJ, 543, 599 9. Colbert, E. J. M., & Mushotzky, R. F. 1999, ApJ, 519, 89 10. Ebisuzaki, T., Makino J., & Okumura S. K. 1991, Nature, 354, 212 11. Faber, S. M., et al. 1997, AJ, 114, 1771 12. Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. 2000, ApJ, 539, L9 13. Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2001, ApJ, 550, 372 14. Fuller, T. M., & Couchman, H. M. P. 2000, ApJ, 544, 6 15. Gammie, C. F., Shapiro, S. L., & McKinney, J. C. 2004, ApJ, 602, 312 16. Gebhardt, K., et al. 2000, ApJ, 543, L5 17. Haehnelt, M.G. 1994, MNRAS, 269, 199 18. Haehnelt, M. G., & Kauffmann, G. 2000, MNRAS, 318, L35 19. Haiman, Z., Abel, T., & Rees, M. J. 2000, ApJ, 534, 11 20. Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E. 2002, ApJ, 567, 532 21. Hernquist, L. 1992, ApJ, 400, 460 22. Hughes, S. A., & Blandford, R. D. 2003, ApJ, 585, L101 23. Islam, R. R., Taylor, J. E., & Silk, J. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 647 24. Kaaret, P., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 321, L29 25. Kauffmann, G., & Haehnelt, M. G. 2000, MNRAS 311, 576 26. Krolik, J. H. 2004, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0407285) 27. Kuhlen, M., & Madau, P. 2004, in prepration 28. Machacek, M. M., Bryan, G. L., & Abel, T. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 273 29. Madau, P., & Rees, M. J. 2001, ApJ, 551, L27 30. Madau, P., Rees, M. J., Volonteri, M., Haardt, F., & Oh, S. P. 2004, ApJ, 606, 484 31. Marconi, A., Risaliti, G., Gilli, R., Hunt, L. K., Maiolino, R., & Salvati, M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169 32. Menou, K., Haiman, Z., & Narayanan, V. K. 2001, ApJ, 558, 535 33. Miller, M. C. 2004, preprint (astro-ph/0409331) 34. Miller, M. C., & Colbert, E. J. M. 2004, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D13, 1 35. Milosavljevic, M., & Merritt, D. 2001, ApJ, 563, 34 36. Milosavljevic, M., Merritt, D., Rest, A., van den Bosch, F. C. 2002, MNRAS, 331, L51 37. Natarajan, P., & Pringle, J. E. 1998, ApJ, 506, L97 38. Oh, P. S. 2001, ApJ, 553, 499 39. Oh, S. P., & Haiman, Z. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 456 40. Oh, S. P., Nollett, K. M., Madau, P., & Wasserburg, G. J. 2001, ApJ, 562, L1 41. Omukai, K., & Palla, F. 2003, ApJ, 589, 677 42. Ricotti, M., & Ostriker, J. P. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 547 43. Schaerer, D. 2002, A&A, 382, 28 44. Schneider, R., Ferrara, A., Natarajan, P., & Omukai, K. 2002, ApJ, 571, 30 45. Sesana, A., Haardt, F., Madau, P., & Volonteri, M. 2004, ApJ, 611, 623 46. Sesana, A., Haardt, F., Madau, P., & Volonteri, M. 2004, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0409255) 47. Shull, J. M., & Van Steenberg, M. E. 1985, ApJ, 298, 268 48. Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1 16 Piero Madau 49. Soltan, A. 1982, MNRAS, 200, 115 50. Venkatesan, A., Giroux, M. L., & Shull, M. J. 2001, ApJ, 563, 1 51. Volonteri, M., Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 2003, ApJ, 582, 559 52. Volonteri, M., Madau, P., & Haardt, F. 2003, ApJ, 593, 661 53. Volonteri, M., Madau, P., Quataert, E., & Rees, M. J. 2004, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0410342) 54. Whalen, D., Abel, T., & Norman, M. L. 2004, ApJ, 610, 22 55. Wyithe, J.S.B., & Loeb, A. 2003 ApJ, 590, 691 56. Yu, Q., & Tremaine, S. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 965
astro-ph/0309557	1	0309	2003-09-20T15:14:29	The Radio Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts	[ "astro-ph" ]	Radio afterglow studies have become an integral part of the study of gamma-ray bursts, providing complementary and sometimes unique diagnostics on GRB explosions, their progenitors, and their environments. This brief review consists of two parts. The first section is a summary of current search strategies and the main observational properties of radio afterglows. In the second section we highlight the key scientific contributions made by radio observations, either alone or as part of panchromatic studies.	astro-ph	astro-ph	The Radio Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts Dale A. Frail National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM 87801 USA 1 Introduction Our understanding of the gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) has advanced rapidly since the discovery of long-lived "afterglow" emission from these events. Ra- dio afterglow studies have become an integral part of this field, providing complementary and sometimes unique diagnostics on GRB explosions, their progenitors, and their environments. The reason for this is that the radio part of the spectrum is phenomenologically rich. This can be illustrated simply by calculating the brightness temperature (Tb ∝ Fν/(θs ν)2) for a 1 mJy cen- timeter wavelength source at cosmological distances (∼ 1028 cm), expanding with Vexp ≤ c one week after the burst. Since the derived Tb ∼ 1013 K is well in excess of the TIC ∼ 1011 − 1012 K limit imposed by inverse Compton cooling, it follows, independent of any specific afterglow model, that the radio emission must originate from a compact, synchrotron-emitting source that is expanding superluminally (i.e. Tb ∼ Γ × TIC, Γ >> 1). Likewise, since the brightness temperature cannot exceed the mean kinetic energy of the elec- trons, the emission is expected to be self-absorbed at longer wavelengths [1]. Finally, strong modulation of the centimeter signal is expected on timescales of hours and days because the angular size θs of this superluminal source is comparable to the Fresnel angle of the turbulent ionized gas in our Galaxy [2]. Synchrotron self-absorption, interstellar scintillation, forward shocks, reverse shocks, jet-breaks, non-relativistic transitions and obscured star formation are among the phenomena routinely observed. This short review is divided into two parts. The first section (§2) is a sum- mary of the current search strategies and the main observational properties of radio afterglows. In the second section (§3) we highlight the key scientific con- tributions made by radio observations, either alone or as part of panchromatic studies. By necessity we will restrict this brief review to long-duration GRBs, although radio afterglows have also been detected toward the newly classified X-ray flashes, and searches have been carried out toward short bursts [3]. 2 Dale A. Frail 2 Detection Statistics and Observational Properties The search for a radio afterglow is initiated either by a satellite localization of the burst, or by the detection of the X-ray or optical afterglow. The current search strategy has been to use the Very Large Array (VLA)1 or the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA; for declinations, δ < −40◦)2 at 5 GHz or 8.5 GHz. These frequencies were chosen as a compromise between the need to image the typical error box size of 30-100 arcmin2, while having the requisite sensitivity to detect afterglows at sub-milliJansky levels. At lower frequencies the afterglow is attenuated by synchrotron self-absorption (fν ∝ ν 2), while at higher frequencies the field-of-view is proportionally smaller (FOV∝ ν 2). For typical integration times (10 min at the VLA, and 240 min at the ATCA) the rms (receiver) noise is 30-50 µJy. Follow-up observations of detected after- glows were carried out by a network of radio facilities at centimeter, millimeter and submillimeter wavelengths [4]. s w o g r e l t f A f o r e b m u N 15 10 5 0 s w o g r e l t f A f o r e b m u N 6 5 4 3 2 1 100 Flux Density (µJy) 1000 29 30 Radio Luminosity (erg/s/Hz) 31 32 33 Fig. 1. (Left) Histogram distribution of flux densities (or upper limits) at 8.5 GHz for a complete sample of bursts. The hatched histogram shows the distribution for the detections only. (Right) Histograms of radio luminosity from the same sample but restricted to the subset of bursts with known redshifts. The hatched histogram shows the distribution for bursts with detected radio afterglows only. In the five year period beginning in 1997 and ending in 2001 approximately 1500 radio flux density measurements (or upper limits) were made toward 75 bursts [5]. From these 75 GRBs, there are a total of 32/36 successful X- ray searches, 27/70 successful optical searches, and 25/75 successful searches. These afterglow search statistics illustrate a well-known result, namely that the detection probability for X-ray afterglows is near unity, while for optical 1 The NRAO is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under co- operative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. 2 The Australia Telescope is funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for opera- tion as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. The Radio Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts 3 afterglows and radio afterglows it is 40% and 33%, respectively. The origin of these optically "dark bursts" could either be due to intrinsic effects (i.e. inadequate search due to rapid evolution of the afterglow and/or an under- energetic GRB) [6, 7], or an extrinsic effect (i.e. extinction of the optical flux caused by circumburst dust or by the intergalactic medium) [8, 9]. To accurately derive the fraction of "radio quiet" bursts it is necessary to incorporate both detections and upper limits in a statistically sound manner. This has been done in Fig. 1 where flux density distribution at 8.5 GHz is shown for a sample of 44 GRBs, toward which measurements or upper limits have been made between 5 and 10 days after a burst. The time since the burst is an important variable since radio light curves do not exhibit the simple power-law decays seen in X-ray and optical afterglows, but rise to a peak on average about one week after the burst and decay on timescales of a month. The mean of the 19 detections in Fig. 1 is 315±82 µJy. Adding in the non- detections, and using the Kaplan-Meier estimator [10] shifts this to 186±40 µJy. Approximately 50% of all bursts have radio afterglows at 8.5 GHz above 110 µJy, while fewer than 10% exceed 500 µJy. The relatively small range of peak flux densities in Fig. 1 suggests that the fraction of "radio quiet" bursts is largely determined by instrumental sensitivities. With the arcsecond localizations provided by the Swift satellite (launch in 2004) it will be possible to routinely detect all afterglows with centimeter radio emission above 100 µJy. Increasing the fraction of detected radio afterglows significantly above 50% will require the sensitivity improvements provided by the Expanded Very Large Array3 (complete in 2010). From this sample of peak flux densities we also derive the peak spectral L (1 + z)1+β−α, where Fν ∝ radio luminosity in Fig. 1 given by Lν = 4πFν d2 tανβ and α = 1/2 and β = 1/3 has been assumed, corresponding to an optically thin, rising light curve. The GRB redshifts lie in the range between z =0.36 to z=4.5. The peak of the distribution is centered on 1031 erg s−1 Hz−1 and is similar to low-luminosity FRI radio galaxies like M87. More interestingly, a comparison between this GRB sample and a sample of Type Ib/c supernovae [11] shows that the later is four orders of magnitude less luminous. Since radio emission is sensitive to the relativistic energy content of the shock, independent of the initial geometry of the explosion, this has been used to argue that the majority (<97%) of nearby Type Ib/c supernovae do not produce a GRB-like event, such as that seen toward SN 1998bw [12]. 3 Phenomenology and Interpretation In this section we will follow the evolution a GRB and its radio afterglow depicted schematically in Fig. 2. The observations span four orders of mag- nitude in time (0.1-1000 days) and three orders of magnitude in frequency 3 http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/evla/ 4 Dale A. Frail (0.8-660 GHz), so it should be no surprise that radio light curves exhibit a rich phenomenology. To interpret these observations we will rely on the highly successful "standard fireball model" [13]. In this model there is an impulsive release of kinetic energy (∼1051 erg) from the GRB event which drives an ultra-relativistic outflow into the surrounding medium whose hydrodynami- cal evolution is governed by the kinetic energy released, the density structure of the circumburst medium and the geometry of the outflow. Synchrotron emission is produced by this relativistic shock which accelerates electrons to a power-law distribution. It is through the study of temporal (and spectral) evolution of afterglow light curves that we can gain insight into the physical conditions of the shock and the central engine that produced it. −2 t 1−5 days 10−30 days 1 day 1/2 t −1/3 t Reverse Shock Forward Shock θ, Reverse shocks: Γ Interstellar scintillation: E/n Synchrotron self−absorption: n θ > 0.2 Wide−angle jets: Circumburst environment: Non−relativistic evolution: Host galaxies: jet ISM vs. Wind, n E, n, B, θ Obscured Star Formation Non−Relativistic −2.2 t −1.2 t 50−100 days Host Galaxy Fig. 2. A schematic radio afterglow light curve. Timescales and scalings for the temporal evolution are indicated. The list summarizes aspects of the flux evolution which are unique to the radio bands (Lorentz factor, Γ ; source size, θ; energy, E; density, n; jet opening angle, θjet; density profile; magnetic field strength, B; and obscured star formation rate). Despite response times as short as 2 hrs, centimeter searches (§2) are rarely successful until a day or more after a burst. Broadband afterglow spectra show that centimeter emission is attenuated as a result of synchrotron self- absorption [14]. Typical observed values for the self-absorption frequency νa are 5-10 GHz. It is interesting to note that the flux density below νa has the form Fν ∝ ν 2, not the 5/2 spectral slope usually seen toward most radio sources. This is because the relativistic shock accelerates electrons to a power- law distribution (with energy index p given by N(γe) ∝ γ−p e ) above a minimum energy γm, which initially radiate their energy most of their energy at νm >> The Radio Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts 5 νa. The flux below νa depends only the angular size of the source and the fraction of the shock energy that goes into accelerating electrons [1], and thus it is a useful diagnostic of the ratio of the energy of the shock and the density of the circumburst medium (E/n). As this optically thick radio source expands, a monotonic rise in the flux would be expected. It was therefore a considerable surprise when early obser- vations of GRB 970508 showed erratic, short term (∼ hrs) and narrow band (∼GHz) fluctuations in the centimeter emission [15]. The origin of these varia- tions [2] was traced to the scattering of the radio emission, owing to the small angular size of the fireball, as it propagates through the turbulent ionized gas of our Galaxy. This is a large and complex subject [16, 17], but for the purpose of this review it is sufficient to note that for typical lines of sight the modulation of the flux densities is near a maximum at frequencies near 5-10 GHz. Coincidently, this is the same frequency range where νa typically lies and where the majority of radio observations are being made. While interstel- lar scintillation adds a certain degree of complexity to interpreting afterglow light curves, it also allows us to use the Galaxy as a large lens to effectively resolve the fireball. The observed "quenching" of diffractive scintillation from GRB 970708 four weeks after the burst [18, 19] lead to estimate of the angular size, demonstrating superluminal expansion and providing an early confirma- tion of the fireball model. In many instances [20, 21, 22, 23, 24] bright, short-lived radio "flares" are detected at early times (t < 3 d). The emission is much brighter than expected from a backward extrapolation of the light curve, and the level of fluctuation is too great to be accounted for by interstellar scintillation. One of the best-known examples is the radio flare of GRB 990123 [20], which was accompanied by a 9th magnitude optical flash [25]. This prompt optical and radio emission is thought to be produced in a strong reverse shock which adiabatically cools as it expands back through the relativistic ejecta [26]. The strength and lifetime of this reverse shock emission is sensitive to the initial Lorentz factor, Γ◦, of the shock and the density structure of the circumburst medium [27, 24]. To properly constrain these values requires that the peak of the emission be measured. This is difficult to do with optical observations, which require a response time on the order of the burst duration, while radio observations require a response time of only 12-48 hrs. On a timescale of days to weeks after the burst, the subsequent evolution of the radio afterglow (Fig. 2) can be described by a slow rise to maximum, followed by a power-law decay. The radio peak is often accompanied by a sharp break in the optical (or X-ray) light curves [28, 29]. The most commonly accepted (but not universal) explanation for these achromatic breaks is that GRB outflows are collimated. The change in spectral slope, α, where Fν ∝ tανβ, occurs when the Γ of the shock drops below θ−1 , the inverse opening angle of the jet [30, 31]. Since the radio emission at νR initially lies below the synchrotron peak frequency νm the jet break signature is distinctly different than that at optical and X-ray wavelengths. Prior to the passage of νm the j 6 Dale A. Frail jet break is expected to give rise to a shallow decay t−1/3 or plateau t0, in the optical thin (νa < νR) or thick (νa > νR) regimes, respectively. Another recognizable radio signature of a jet-like geometry is the "peak flux cascade", in which successively smaller frequencies reach lower peak fluxes (i.e. Fm ∝ ν 1/2 m ). Taken together, these observational signatures can be used to infer the opening angles θj of wide angle jets. Such jets are hard to detect at optical wavelengths because the break is masked by the host galaxy, which typically dominates the light curve between a week and a month after the burst [32, 33]. Once the real geometry of the outflow is known [34, 35] the energy released in the GRB phase and the afterglow phase can be determined. As noted above, the radio band is fortuitously located close to νa and as such it is a sensitive probe of the density structure of the circumburst medium. Extensive broadband modeling [36] has yielded densities in the range 0.1 cm−3 < n< 100 cm−3, with a canonical value of order n≃10 cm−3. Such densities are found in the diffuse interstellar clouds of our Galaxy, commonly associated with star-forming regions. A density of order 5-30 cm−3 is also characteristic of the interclump medium of molecular clouds, as inferred from observations of supernova remnants in our Galaxy (e.g., Chevalier 1999 and references therein). Based on X-ray and optical observations alone, there have been claims of high n≫ 104 cm−3 [38, 39] or low n≪ 10−3 cm−3 [40] cir- cumburst densities. However, in several of these cases when the radio data has been added to the broadband modeling (i.e. constraining νa), there is no longer any support for either extreme of density [22, 33]. One unsolved problem on the structure of the circumburst environment is the absence of an unambiguous signature of mass loss from the presumed massive progenitor star in afterglow light curves [41]. Although there are some notable exceptions (e.g., Price et al. 2002), most GRB light curves are best fit by a jet expanding into a constant density medium instead of a radial density gradient, ρ ∝ r−2 [36]. Part of the solution may lie in reduced mass loss rates due to metalicity effects, or the motion of the star through a dense molecular cloud [43], both of which act to shrink the radius that the pre-burst wind is freely expanding. It is equally likely that our failure to distinguish between different models of the circumburst medium is due to the lack of early afterglow flux measurements, especially at millimeter and submillimeter wavelengths where the largest differences arise [44, 45]. The resolution of this conflict is important as it goes to the heart of the GRB progenitor question. At sufficiently late times, when the rest mass energy swept up by the expanding shock becomes comparable to the initial kinetic energy of the ejecta (∼100 days), the expanding shock may slow to non-relativistic speeds [46]. A change in the temporal slope is expected at this time (Fig. 2) with αN R = (21 − 15p)/10 for a constant density medium, independent of geometry. This dynamical transition provides a simple and power method to derive the kinetic energy of the outflow which has expanded to be quasi-spherical at this time. In contrast, most energy estimates made at early times require knowledge of the geometry of the outflow [40, 47, 35]. Using the late-time radio light The Radio Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts 7 curves and the robust Taylor-Sedov formulation for the dynamics we can infer quantities such as the kinetic energy, ambient density, magnetic field strength, and the size of the fireball. The radius can be checked for consistency with the equipartition radius and the interstellar scintillation radius. This method has been used for GRB 970508 [19] and for GRB 980703 (Berger, priv. comm.), yielding energies of order f ew × 1050 erg, in agreement with other estimates. Finally, the radio light curves at late times may flatten due to the presence of an underlying host galaxy. Most GRBs studied to date have optical/NIR hosts but only about 20% have been seen at centimeter and submillimeter wavelengths [48, 49, 50]. This radio emission, if produced by star formation, implies star formation rates SRF∼ 500 M⊙ yr−1 and Lbol > 1012 L⊙, clearly identifies these GRB hosts as ultraluminous starburst galaxies which are all but obscured by dust at optical wavelengths. This is an emerging area with great potential for studying cosmic star formation with a sample of galax- ies selected quite differently than other methods. Preliminary studies have already shown that GRB-selected galaxies are significantly bluer than other radio-selected samples [50]. Acknowledgements. DAF would like to thank his many collaborators in the radio afterglow network, especially Shri Kulkarni and Edo Berger. References 1. Katz, J. L. and Piran, T. ApJ, 490, 772, (1997). 2. Goodman, J. New Astr., 2(5), 449 -- 460, (1997). 3. Hurley, K., et al. ApJ, 567, 447 -- 453, (2002). 4. Frail, D. A., et al. in AIP Conf. Proc. 526: Gamma-ray Bursts, 5th Huntsville Symposium, 298 -- 302, (2000). 5. Frail, D. A., et al. AJ, 125, 2299 -- 2306, (2003). 6. Fynbo, J. U., et al. A&A, 369, 373 -- 379, (2001). 7. Berger, E., et al. ApJ, 581, 981 -- 987, (2002). 8. Piro, L., et al. ApJ, 577, 680 -- 690, (2002). 9. Djorgovski, S. G., et al. ApJ, 562, 654 -- 663, (2001). 10. Feigelson, E. D. and Nelson, P. I. ApJ, 293, 192 -- 206, (1985). 11. Berger, E. et al. A Radio Survey of Type Ib and Ic Supernovae: Searching for Engine Driven Supernovae. ApJ, in press; astro-ph/0307228, (2003). 12. Kulkarni, S. R., et al. Nature, 395, 663 -- 669, (1998). 13. M´esz´aros, P. Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap., 40, 137 -- 169, (2002). 14. Galama, T. J., et al. ApJ, 541, L45 -- L49, (2000). 15. Frail, D. A., et al. Nature, 389, 261 -- 263, (1997). 16. Rickett, B. J. Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap., 28, 561 -- 605, (1990). 17. Galama, T. J., et al. ApJ, 585, 899 -- 907, (2003). 18. Waxman, E., Kulkarni, S. R., and Frail, D. A. ApJ, 497, 288 -- 293, (1998). 19. Frail, D. A., Waxman, E., and Kulkarni, S. R. ApJ, 537, 191 -- 204, (2000). 20. Kulkarni, S. R., et al. ApJ, 522, L97 -- L100, (1999). 21. Frail, D. A., et al. ApJ, 538, L129 -- L132, (2000). 22. Harrison, F. A., et al. ApJ, 559, 123 -- 130, (2001). 8 Dale A. Frail 23. Yost, S. A., et al. ApJ, 577, 155 -- 163, (2002). 24. Berger, E., et al. ApJ, 587, L5 -- L8, (2003). 25. Akerlof, C., et al. Nature, 398, 400 -- 402, (1999). 26. Sari, R. and Piran, T. ApJ, 517, L109 -- L112, (1999). 27. Soderberg and Ramirez-Ruiz. Flaring up: Radio Diagnostics of the Kinematic, Hydrodynamic and Environmental Properties of GRBs. MNRAS, in press; astro-ph/astro-ph/0210524, (2002). 28. Harrison, F. A., et al. ApJ, 523, L121 -- L124, (1999). 29. Berger, E., et al. ApJ, 545, 56 -- 62, (2000). 30. Rhoads, J. E. ApJ, 525, 737 -- 749, (1999). 31. Sari, R., Piran, T., and Halpern, J. P. ApJ, 519, L17 -- L20, (1999). 32. Berger, E., et al. ApJ, 556, 556 -- 561, (2001). 33. Frail, D. A., et al. ApJ, 590, 992 -- 998, (2003). 34. Frail, D. A., et al. ApJ, 562, L55 -- L58, (2001). 35. Bloom, J. S., Frail, D. A., and Kulkarni, S. R. GRB Energetics and the GRB Hubble Diagram: Promises and Limitations. ApJ in press, astro-ph/0302210, (2003). in' t Zand, J., et al. ApJ, 559, 710 -- 715, (2001). 36. Panaitescu, A. and Kumar, P. ApJ, 571, 779 -- 789, (2002). 37. Chevalier, R. A. ApJ, 511, 798 -- 811, (1999). 38. Dai, Z. G. and Lu, T. ApJ, 537, 803 -- 809, (2000). 39. 40. Panaitescu, A. and Kumar, P. ApJ, 554, 667 -- 677, (2001). 41. Chevalier, R. A. and Li, Z. ApJ, 536, 195 -- 212, (2000). 42. Price, P. A., et al. ApJ, 572, L51 -- L55, (2002). 43. Wijers, R. A. M. J. in Gamma-ray Bursts in the Afterglow Era, 306 -- 311, (2001). 44. Panaitescu, A. and Kumar, P. ApJ, 543, 66 -- 76, (2000). 45. Yost, S. et al. A Study of the Afterglows of Four GRBs: Constraining the Explosion and Fireball Model. ApJ, in press; astro-ph/0307056, (2003). 46. Wijers, R. A. M. J., Rees, M. J., and M´esz´aros, P. MNRAS, 288, L51 -- L56, (1997). 47. Berger, E., Kulkarni, S. R., and Frail, D. A. ApJ, 590, 379 -- 385, (2003). 48. Berger, E., Kulkarni, S., and Frail, D. A. ApJ, 560, 652 -- 658, (2001). 49. Frail, D. A., et al. ApJ, 565, 829 -- 835, (2002). 50. Berger, E., et al. ApJ, 588, 99 -- 112, (2003).
astro-ph/9709290	2	9709	1997-09-30T07:19:23	Dynamical Friction for Compound Bodies	[ "astro-ph" ]	In the framework of the fluctuation-dissipation approach to dynamical friction, we derive an expression giving the orbital energy exchange experienced by a compound body as it moves interacting with a non homogeneous discrete background. The body is assumed to be composed of particles endowed with a velocity spectrum and with a non homogeneous spatial distribution. The Chandrasekhar formula is recovered in the limit of a point-like satellite with zero velocity dispersion and infinite temperature moving through an homogeneous infinite medium. In this same limit, but dropping the zero satellite velocity dispersion ($\sigma_S$) condition, the orbital energy loss is found to be smaller than in the $\sigma_S=0$ case by a factor of up to an order of magnitude in some situations.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 10 (0000) Printed 13 September 2016 (MN LATEX style file v1.4) Dynamical friction for compound bodies R. Dom´ınguez-Tenreiro & M.A. G´omez-Flechoso⋆ Dept. F´ısica Te´orica, C-XI. Univ. Aut´onoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid Accepted ..... Received .....; in original form 1997 May 14 ABSTRACT In the framework of the fluctuation-dissipation approach to dynamical friction, we derive an expression giving the orbital energy exchange experienced by a compound body as it moves interacting with a non homogeneous discrete background. The body is assumed to be composed of particles endowed with a velocity spectrum and with a non homogeneous spatial distribution. The Chandrasekhar formula is recovered in the limit of a point-like satellite with zero velocity dispersion and infinite temperature moving through an homogeneous infinite medium. In this same limit, but dropping the zero satellite velocity dispersion (σS) condition, the orbital energy loss is found to be smaller than in the σS = 0 case by a factor of up to an order of magnitude in some situations. Key words: methods: analytical -- celestial mechanics, stellar dynamics, galaxy dynamics. 1 INTRODUCTION A satellite moving through a field of gravitating particles experiences a dissipative frictional force known as dynam- ical friction. It can be understood in terms of the satellite wake, that exerts a drag force on the satellite itself (Kalnajs 1972; Binney & Tremaine 1987; Weinberg 1989; Bekenstein & Zamir 1991). It can also been understood in terms of the underlying basic physics as the friction resulting from the fluctuating gravitating forces acting on the satellite as a consequence of the non-continuos character of the particle system. The fact that fluctuating forces cause dissipation is quite a general scheme in Physics. It is at the basis of phys- ical phenomena such as electric resistance in conductors or viscous friction in liquids (Reif 1965). Dynamical friction has important consequences in the evolution of astronomical systems, mainly because it causes a decay of orbiting bodies, so that merger timescales and dis- sipation rates by dynamical friction are closely related. The merger scenario is at the basis of a great deal of processes in Astronomy. Not only is it the framework for the general galaxy formation picture in hierarchical cosmological mod- els, but also for more particular aspects of the evolution of a number of astronomical systems, such as galactic nuclei, cD galaxies in rich galaxy clusters, compact galaxy groups and so on. A dynamical friction formula was first obtained, in a ⋆ Present address: Observatoire de Gen`eve, Ch. des Maillettes 51, Ch-1290 Sauverny (Switzerland) c(cid:13) 0000 RAS kinematical approach, by Chandrasekhar (1943). He has cal- culated the rate of momentum exchange between the test and field particles as the result of a sum of uncorrelated two-body encounters, obtaining the expression: M dv dt = − 4πG2M 2 v3 ln Λ ρ(< v) v, (1) where M and v are the test particle mass and speed, re- spectively, ρ(< v) is the density of background particles with velocity less than v, G is the gravitation constant and Λ = pmax , with pmax and pmin the maximum and minimum pmin impact parameters contributing to the drag. Keplerian or- bits for both the test and field particles and an infinite and homogeneous background have been assumed in the deriva- tion of eq. (1) Chandrasekhar's formula is widely employed to quantify dynamical friction in a variety of situations, even if in most astronomical problems the background is neither infinite nor homogeneous. This formula is known to give the correct or- der of magnitude, but it suffers from several drawbacks, that arise from the very physical assumptions made in its deriva- tion. Furthermore, it cannot describe some situations, as for example the drag experienced by a satellite placed outside the edge of a finite gravitating system. In fact, the satel- lite would be decelerated on physical grounds, because it causes a perturbation to the system. However, according to eq. (1), the drag would vanish. For this reason, other works on dynamical friction followed Chandrasekhar's pioneering study, either from a numerical (Lin & Tremaine 1983; White 1983; Bontekoe & van Albada 1987; Zaritsky & White 1988) or an analytical point of view. Analytical descriptions have 2 R. Dom´ınguez-Tenreiro & M.A. G´omez-Flechoso the advantage that they help understanding the underly- ing physics. Several methods have been developed: Fokker- Planck equation based (Rosenblunth, Mc Donald & Judd 1957; Binney & Tremaine 1987) polarization cloud approach (Marochnik 1968; Kalnajs 1972; Binney & Tremaine 1987; Weinberg 1989; Bekenstein & Zamir 1991), resonant parti- cle interactions (Lynden-Bell & Kalnajs 1972; Tremaine & Weinberg 1984; Palmer & Papaloizou 1985; Weinberg 1986). Berkenstein and Maoz (1992, hereafter BM92) and Maoz (1993, hereafter M93) introduced a fluctuation- dissipation approach to dynamical friction. The fluctuation- dissipation theorem (Kubo 1959) relates the friction coeffi- cient to the time integral of the correlation function for the fluctuations causing the friction. They showed that dynam- ical friction fits into this general scheme, which provides a powerful technique to study it. This approach is in fact a return to Chandrasekhar's original attempt to give a sta- tistical description of dynamical friction. Other stochastic approaches to dynamical friction are those of Cohen (1975) and Kandrup (1980). M93 derived a formula for the drag experienced by an object which travels in an arbitrary mass density field, assumed to be stationary and formed by par- ticles much lighter than the object. A common feature of all the previous approaches is that they treat the satellite as being rigid and without struc- ture in the velocity space. This approximation can be good enough in a number of astronomical situations, but in oth- ers, these two ingredients could play a crucial role. As a first example of such a situation, let us consider the dynamical evolution of compact groups of galaxies (e.g. Mamon 1993). In this case, the velocity dispersion of individual galaxies is comparable to the velocity dispersion of the common halo that hosts them. As a second example, we recall that in the problem of the interaction of two comparable mass galax- ies, the energy exchange due to dynamical friction cannot be calculated in the previous frameworks, because their pre- sumably comparable velocity dispersions need to be taken into account. In this paper we present a fluctuation-dissipation study of the orbital changes experienced by a non-rigid satellite, composed of gravitating particles with a finite velocity dis- persion, as it interacts with a general background. An exten- sion of BM92 and M93 techniques has allowed us to calculate the rate of energy exchange between them as a result of fluc- tuations in the gravitational forces of both the background and the satellite. The paper is organized as follows: in Sect. 2, the phys- ical formulation of the method and the general expressions giving the energy exchange rate are presented. In Sect. 3, we calculate the instantaneous energy variations for general backgrounds at rest and with a Maxwellian velocity distribu- tion. Some particular limits are dealt with in Sect. 4. Finally, in Sect. 5, we summarize and discuss our results. Two Ap- pendices follow, where the results of the calculation of the correlation matrix and of an integral needed are given. 2 PHYSICAL FORMULATION We will study the energy exchange between two self- gravitating equilibrium systems called the background (B) and the satellite (S). The background consists of NB equal mass particles, each of them with a mass mB. Its total mass and typical size are MB = mBNB and RB, respectively. These particles exhibit a velocity spectrum with dispersion σB and zero mean at t = 0 (which is equivalent to consid- ering the origin of the reference system placed at the halo center of mass at t = 0). The satellite in turn is composed of NS equal mass particles of mass mS, total mass MS, typical size RS, and a velocity distribution with dispersion σS and mean equal to the center of mass velocity of the satellite, vCM S. As we are mainly interested in the effects that a non vanishing σS would have on the evolution of the whole sys- tem, we can consider that σS ∼ σB ≡ σ. The virial theorem tells us that σ ∼ GN mR−1, so that σS ∼ σB implies that NSmSR−1 (2) S ∼ NBmBR−1 B . As both the satellite and the background are assumed to have a finite size, we can safely consider that (3) N 1/n Rγ(cid:19)m α ≫(cid:18) Rβ for whatever α, β, γ = B or S, and n, m of order unity. If mα ≫ m α ( α is the particle class contrary to α), as could be the case, for example, when the α and α systems are composed of stars and dark matter particles, respectively, then eqs. (2) and (3) imply the inequality Nα ≪ N α. But, in any case, both Nα and N α will be assumed to be very large. 2.1 The fluctuating forces acting on a particle The fluctuating force, F iS (riS , t), acting at time t on a satel- lite particle iS placed at position riS and caused by its in- teractions with both background and satellite particles, can be written as: F iS (riS , t) = F B iS (riS , t) + F S iS (riS , t) (4) where F B iS (riS , t) = −GmSmB∇ XjB riS − r (cid:19) − Z drnB(r) and 1 riS − rjB iS (riS , t) = −Gm2 F S (5) (6) riS − rjS 1 S∇ XjS6=iS riS − r (cid:19) Z drnS(r) − NS − 1 NS are the fluctuating forces acting on iS caused by the back- ground and satellite, respectively. Each of these forces re- sults from subtracting to the total many-body or discrete force a smooth part derived from the mean field potentials, ΦB(r) and ΦS(r), due to the smooth densities, nB(r) and nS(r), respectively. These satisfy the relations: nα(r) = NαZ duf α 0 (r, u), (7) c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 ∇2Φα(r) = 4πGmαnα(r) and Z drnα(r) = Nα, (8) (9) NS where α = B, S, f α 0 (r, u) is the one-particle distribution function for background and satellite particles in the unper- turbed state, and the NS−1 factor takes into account that the iS particle does not interact with itself at time t. An exchange of the B and S labels in eq. (5) gives the expres- sion for the fluctuating force on the background particle iB caused by the satellite. Changing the S labels into B in eq. (6) we get the force on iB caused by the background fluctua- tions. In a compact formulation, we can write the fluctuating force on a generic class α particle, iα, due to class β particles as: F β iα (riα , t) = −Gmαmβ∇  Xjβ6=iα riα − r ! Nβ Z drnβ(r) N β − ′ 1 riα − rjβ (10) ′ where now N that α = β. β = Nβ − δαβ takes into account the possibility The equation of motion of either a background or a satellite particle at time t can be written in a compact no- tation as: viα (t) = viα ,0 +Xβ (cid:20) 1 mα Z t ∇Φβ(riα , t′)dt′(cid:21) , 0 − Z t 0 F β iα (riα , t′)dt′ (11) where viα ,0 is the particle velocity at time t = 0. Stochastic forces are weak as compared with the smooth global forces. In fact, the fluctuating force between a class α and a class β particle is of order (Kandrup 1980, Saslaw 1985) F β iα,f luc = O(cid:0)Gmαmβn2/3(cid:1) , where n ∼ NαR−3 is the average particle number density for the whole system. The smooth density of class δ particles causes a gravitating force on a class γ particle that is of order: jγ ,smooth = O(cid:0)Gmγ mδNδR−2 F δ δ (cid:1) . Eqs. (12) and (13) give, after some algebra: α + (1− δαβ)NβR−3 (12) (13) β F β iα,f luc F δ jγ ,smooth = O "(cid:16) mβ + (1 − δαβ)(cid:16) mβ Rβ(cid:19)2 mδ(cid:17)1/2(cid:18) Rδ mδ(cid:17)3/2(cid:21)2/3 δ !,(14) where eq. (2) has been taken into account. Now, if mS ∼ mB, then we will have N−1/3 mα mγ c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Dynamical friction for compound bodies 3 , (15) N−1/3 δ  + (1 − δαβ)#2/3 = O "(cid:18) Rδ Rβ(cid:19)2  F β iα,f luc F δ jγ ,smooth this is indeed a very small quantity. If, on the contrary, back- ground and satellite particles have very different masses, eq. (14) must be examined more carefully. The most unfavor- able case is when mδ ≪ mδ, γ = δ and α = β = δ. In this case, eq. (14) gives: F β iα,f luc F δ jγ ,smooth and it would be sufficient to ask that mδi4/3(cid:20) Rδ Rβ(cid:21)4/3 δ ! , N−1/3 (16) = O h mβ mδ(cid:17)4/3 N 1/3 δ ≫(cid:16) mδ (17) to ensure that the fluctuating forces are much smaller than the smooth ones. Next we compare the timescale for fluctuation, ταβ, and the timescale Tγδ over which the velocity of class γ parti- cles changes appreciably as a result of the smooth forces produced by class δ particles. The first is of order of the time required for the nearest neighbor to travel an inter- particle distance, ταβ = 1 σn1/3 , where σ is σα or σ α and n = nα + (1− δαβ)nβ. As it may happen that nα and nβ are very different, we take the maximum ταβ timescale, corre- sponding to nmin = NminR−3 min. The second timescale is set by Tγδ = vγ , so that we can write ∇Φδ ∼ vγRδ σ2 τ max αβ Tγδ ∼ O(cid:16)N−1/3 min Rmin Rδ (cid:17) ≪ 1, where we have used the inequality (3). (18) The rate of energy exchange between subsystems B and S will be obtained as an integral on time which involves the correlation matrix (see below and BM92 and M93). The correlation matrix is known to fall with time faster than t−1 (Cohen 1975; Kandrup 1980; M93), so that it can be taken to vanish for times much larger than the fluctuation timescale, and in particular for times of the order of the macroscopic timescale, Tγδ. As a consequence, in this work we will consider time intervals after t = 0, δt, which are large as compared with the fluctuation timescale, τ max αβ , but much shorter than the macroscopic timescale (see Reif 1965 and M93 for a detailed discussion) τ max αβ ≪ δt ≪ min(cid:20) vα d dt vα , ∇Φγ (cid:21) . vα (19) 2.2 The energy exchange The energy of a particle iα is not conserved. Its total in- stantaneous variation at time t, due to the fluctuating forces caused by class β particles is given by: iα (cid:18) dEβ dt (cid:19)t = F β iα (t) · viα (t). (20) Taking into account the expression for viα (t) given by eq. (11), we get for times t verifying (19) iα (cid:18) dEβ dt (cid:19)t = F β iα (t) ·"viα,0 + 1 mα Xγ Z t 0 dt′F γ iα (t′)# , (21) 4 R. Dom´ınguez-Tenreiro & M.A. G´omez-Flechoso where the potential terms have been neglected because viα,0 ≫ ∇Φγ t, as ensured by (19). The total energy change of the iα particle during the time interval (0, δt) is easily calculated by integrating eq. (21). Summing up on iα we get the total energy variation of class α particles due to the fluctuating forces caused by β particles in this time interval: exponential in eq.(23), we obtain that the change in the probability function is given approximately by: K = 1 −Xα Xiα 1 f α ∂f α ∂εiα δεiα . (27) For most astronomical applications it is justified to use an isothermal Maxwellian one-particle distribution function, ∆Eβ dtF β α,tot(δt) = Xiα Z δt mα Xγ Z t + 1 0 0 iα (t)·(cid:20) viα,0 iα (t′)# . dt′F γ f α 0 (r, u) = nα(r) Nα (2πσ2 α)3/2 exp [−βαεiα ] , (28) (22) where u is the velocity vector, σα is the velocity dispersion of class α particles and βα = 1 is an inverse temperature. Introducing this expression for the distribution function in eq. (27), the factor of change becomes: mα σ2 α We will be interested in the average value of this quan- tity. 2.3 Statistical averaging The presence and motion of the iS satellite particle perturbs the background. As a result, while the statistical (ensemble) average of the background fluctuating forces acting on the satellite vanishes in the unperturbed state, hF B iS (t)i0 = 0, they do not vanish anymore in the real perturbed system, hF B iS (t)i 6= 0. The same is true in general for the stochas- tic forces caused by class β particles and acting on class α particles: hF β iα (t)i 6= 0, because the phase density and the number of microstates available to the system has changed due to the perturbation. Following BM92 and M93, we assume that the probability of finding a dynamical variable, Q, with a given value, P [Q], is propor- tional to the change in the number of microstates available to the whole system. This change is given by the factor: iα (t)i0 = 0, but hF β K = exp [δS] , (23) where δS is the entropy change of the system as a result of the distortion. The expected value of a dynamical function, Q, can now be written as: , (24) hQi = R dΓQ(Γ)f0(Γ)K R dΓf0(Γ)K where Γ are the variables defining the phase space of the NB + NS particles and f0(Γ) is the distribution function for the unperturbed state. As a result of the fluctuations, a generic particle initially with energy εiα , will change to an energy ε′iα = εiα + δεiα , α = B, S. Recalling the definition of entropy: S = S0 −Z f ln f dΓ, (25) with S0 a constant, this energy change results into a total entropy variation given by: δS =Xα "−Xiα ln f α(ε′iα ) +Xiα ln f α(εiα )# , (26) where f α(εiα ) is the class α one particle distribution func- tion for the unperturbed state corresponding to an en- ergy εiα . Most two-body encounters are weak, and then δεiα ≪ εiα . Expanding the r.h.s. of eq.(26) and then the K = 1 +Xα βαXiα δεiα . (29) The next step is to find out an expression for the energy variation. The total energy of the system must be conserved, so that we have: δεiα = 0. (30) Xα Xiα Moreover, for one given particle, iα, its energy variation can be expressed as: δεiα = ∆Eα iα + ∆E α iα − aiα ∆Eα α,tot − biα ∆Eα α,tot, (31) where aiα is the fraction of the total class α autointeraction energy, ∆Eα α,tot, absorbed by particle iα, and biα is the frac- tion of the total interaction energy between class α and α particles, caused by the fluctuating forces of the α subsys- tem, absorbed by iα particle. Summing on iα in eq. (31), we get the total energy change of subsystem α: δεiα = ∆E α α,tot − ∆Eα α,tot, Xiα (32) that Piα aiα = Piα compatible with energy conservation (eq. (30)). To write down eq. (32) from (31), it has been taken into account biα = 1. Energy signs are such that ∆Eγ iα > 0 if particle iα gains energy due to the fluc- tuating forces caused by class γ particles and conversely. With this convention, if energy flux is from subsystem α to subsystem α, then ∆E α α,tot < 0 (subsystem α loses en- ergy), and ∆Eα α,tot > 0 (subsystem α gains energy), so that δεi α > 0. Inserting eq. (32) in eq. (29) and recalling eq. (22), we obtain: Piα δεiα < 0 and Pi α βα(Xiα Z δt 0 1 + K = 1 +Xα mα Xγ Z t m α Xγ Z t + 1 0 0 dtF α iα (t)·" viα,0 iα (t′) − Xi α Z δt (t′)#) . 0 dt′F γ dt′F γ i α dtF α i α (t)·" vi α ,0 (33) Eq. (24) allows us now to write the ensemble average of the instantaneous energy variation at time t of a generic class µ particle due to the stochastic forces caused by class ν particles: c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 (cid:28)(cid:18) dEν 0 1 iµ + dtF ρ iµ (δt)·(cid:18) viµ,0 dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = Z dΓf0(Γ)(cid:20) F ν iµ (t)!#"1 +Xα mµ Xρ Z δt · viα,0 + · vi α,0 + mα Xγ Z t m α Xγ Z t βα(Xiα Z δt iα (t′)! −Xi α Z δt (t′)!)#(cid:20)Z dΓf0(Γ)K(cid:21)−1 dt′F γ i α dt′F γ dtF α dtF α i α (t) 1 1 0 0 0 0 iα (t) (34) To second order in the fluctuating forces, taking into account that the average of the stochastic forces in the un- perturbed state vanishes, and summing on the iµ subindex to obtain the global effect, we get: (cid:28)(cid:18) dEν mµ (cid:20)Z 0 −δt 1 µ,tot dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) =Xiµ + (βν − βν )Xj ν Z 0 −δt dsviµ,0C νν dsT r(cid:2)C νν iµiµ (s)(cid:3) iµj ν (s)vj ν ,0# , where C αβ iγ jδ (s) = hF α iγ (0) ⊗ F β jδ (s)i0 (35) (36) is the correlation matrix (see Appendix A; the symbol ⊗ iγ and F β stands for the tensorial product of vectors F α , jδ the average is on the unperturbed states of particles α and β and the invariance of the correlation matrix under time translation has been taken into account). Because in the unperturbed state two different particles are not correlated, the correlation matrix defined in the previous equation van- ishes if α 6= β. This has been taken into account to deduce eq. (35) from eq. (34). Note that because for s ≥ δt the correlations vanish, the lower limit of the integrals can be extended up to −∞. Eq. (35) is the expression of the global instantaneous energy variation of subsystem µ due to the fluctuating forces of subsystem ν. The integrand in the first term of the r.h.s. of eq. (35) is invariant under time rever- sal. Extending the integral to positive s, this term is the corresponding power spectrum at zero frequency (Wiener- Khintchine theorem, see Reif 1965 and BM92) and, conse- quently, it is positive and represents a heating term of class µ particles due to the fluctuating forces caused by ν parti- cles. It is of order O( 1 N ) ≪ 1 relative to the second term. Terms of this kind will be neglected in this work. The sec- ond term can be either positive or negative, depending on the sign of (βν − βν). In the next section it will be explicitly calculated for µ, ν = B, S. 3 THE INSTANTANEOUS ENERGY VARIATION 3.1 Energy exchange between the satellite and the background Energy flows between the satellite and the background as a result of either the global energy variation of the satellite c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Dynamical friction for compound bodies 5 particles due to the fluctuating forces of the background, or, conversely, the global energy variation of the background particles due to the fluctuating forces of the satellite. These fluxes are given by eq. (35) when µ 6= ν. Let us first calculate the effect due to the stochastic forces of the background. This term could cause an energy flux responsible for the satellite deacceleration. Eq. (35) with µ = S, ν = B and neglecting the heating term, gives: (cid:28)(cid:18) dEB S,tot dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = = (βS − βB)XiS XjS Z 0 −∞ dsviS ,0C BB iS jS (s)vjS ,0, (37) where the correlation matrix is given by eq. (A10) with α = B and γ = δ = S. In the case of a point-like satellite with mS ≫ mB, βS ≪ βB and then the satellite loses energy to the background. In our case, however, it is not excluded in principle that βS > βB and then the energy would flow from the background to the satellite. The integral over ds in eq. (37) can be calculated taking into account eq. (A10) and the equality: Z 0 −∞ ds A + V s A + V s 3 = A · V + AV V 2A2 ⊥ A − h A V V i where A⊥ is the projection of vector A on the plane normal to vector V . In our case either V ≡ vjS − vhB or V ≡ vjS , . We (see eq. (A10)), and A ≡ rjS − rhB or A ≡ rjS − r obtain: ′ (38) ′ S,tot Bm2 N B NB (cid:28)(cid:18) dEB dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = G2m2 S(βS − βB) ×XiS XjS "XhB (cid:26) (riS − rhB ) · viS riS − rhB 3 (cid:27) ×(cid:26) [vjS · (rjS − rhB )][(rjS − rhB ) · (vjS − vhB )] rjS − rhB vjS − vhB 2 (rjS − rhB )⊥ 2 − rjS − rhB vjS − vhB 2 (rjS − rhB )⊥ 2 vjS − vhB (rjS − rhB )⊥ 2(cid:27) vjS · (rjS − rhB )⊥ NBZ drdr′nB(r)nB(r′) rjS − rhB 2 (vjS − vhB ) · vjS riS − r 3 rjS − r′ (cid:21) (39) [(riS − r) · viS ] + + 1 where the sum on a generic subindex, iα, means Nα times the average on velocity and positions of class α particles, and is carried out by means of the distribution function given in eq. (28). To proceed further, we recall that the velocity distri- bution of background particles is assumed to be Maxwellian with zero mean and dispersion σB, and the velocity distribu- tion of the satellite particles has mean equal to the satellite center of mass velocity, vCM S, and dispersion σS. The inte- gration over dvhB gives: S,tot (cid:28)(cid:18) dEB dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = G2m2 Bm2 S(βS − βB) 6 R. Dom´ınguez-Tenreiro & M.A. G´omez-Flechoso jS )erf(γjS ) − 1 riS − rhB 3 (cid:27) ×XiS XjS (cid:20)Z drhB nB(rhB )(cid:26) (riS − rhB ) · viS ×(cid:26) exp(γ2 jS − y2 (cid:27) rjS − rhB riS − r 3 rjS − r′ (cid:21) (40) NBZ drdr′nB(r)nB(r′) [(riS − r) · viS ] , γjS ≡ v jS√2σB + 1 ′ The integration over dvjS involves the integral: ) and taking (r jS −rhB r jS −rhB where erf stands for the error function, yjS ≡ yjS · ζ with ζ ≡ I =Z dvjS fM (vjS ) exp(γ2 jS − y2 In Appendix B we show that jS )erf(γjS ). N B NB = 1. (41) (42) I = σ2 B σ2 T exp(α2 CM S − x2 B +σ2 CM S)erf(αCM S), T = σ2 S, xCM S ≡ vCM S√2σT where σ2 and αCM S ≡ xCM S·ζ. The integration over dviS is trivial recalling that viS = vCM S + uiS and that for a Maxwellian distribution the contribution of uiS to the first moments vanishes. Taking mαnα = ρα, we finally get: (cid:28)(cid:18)dEB σ2 S,tot B mSσ2 S −1(cid:19) G2 dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29)=(cid:18)mBσ2 BZ driS drjS ρS(riS )ρS(rjS ) riS − rhB 4 (cid:27) ×(cid:20)Z drhB ρB(rhB )(cid:26) (riS − rhB ) · vCM S ×(cid:26) σ2 CM S)erf(αCM S) − 1(cid:27) NB Z drdr′ρB(r)nB(r′) riS − r 3 rjS − r′ (cid:21)(43) [(riS − r) · vCM S] CM S − x2 exp(α2 B σ2 T + 1 tot (cid:28)(cid:18) dES dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) =(cid:28)(cid:18) dES =(cid:28)(cid:18) dEB dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) S,tot orb dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) +(cid:28)(cid:18) dES dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) in (45) orb and ES where ES in stand for the orbital and internal energy of the satellite, respectively, and the second equality results from the zero value of the flow given by eq. (44). The rate of change of the satellite internal energy can be calculated with the help of eq. (24) with Q = dES in dt or: d dt uiS uiS , Q = mSXiS where uiS = viS − vCM S is the velocity of iS particles with respect to its center of mass. This gives an expression similar to eq. (43), except that now vCM S takes a zero value, so that (46) in (cid:28)(cid:18) dES dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = 0, (47) and then eq. (43) gives, at second order in the fluctuations, the rate of change of the satellite orbital energy. 3.2 The self-interaction energies of the background and the satellite When µ = ν = B or S, eq. (35) describes the instantaneous energy variation rate of class µ particles due to the stochastic forces caused by µ particles themselves. According to the eq. (32) these energies do not play any role in the energy change of the subsystems S or B. They only represent the energy change of an individual particle (see eq. (31)). The self-interaction energy of the background is easily obtained from eq. (35) with µ = ν = B: A specification of the density distribution of both the satellite and the background is needed in order to carry out the integrals over the space variables. Next we calculate the variation of the background en- ergy caused by the stochastic forces of the satellite. It can be obtained from eq.(35) with µ = B and ν = S, neglecting the heating term: B,tot (cid:28)(cid:18) dEB dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = = (βS − βB)XiB XjS Z 0 −∞ dsviB ,0C BB iB jS (s)vjS ,0. (48) B,tot (cid:28)(cid:18) dES dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = = (βB − βS)XiB XjB Z 0 −∞ dsviB ,0C SS iB jB (s)vjB ,0. (44) Again, the integration over dviB makes it vanish for a background at rest with an isotropic velocity distribu- tion function: because no translation energy is available, the autointeraction results only in a slow heating of the back- ground. Regarding the autointeraction energy of the satellite, eq. (35) gives: For a background at rest with a Maxwellian velocity distribution function, this energy rate vanishes when one performs the integration over dviB . We conclude that the effect of fluctuating forces of the satellite acting on the back- ground only heat it, and have no effect on a variation of the orbital energy of either the satellite or the background. The total instantaneous energy flow between the satel- lite and the background is given by the difference between the l.h.s. of the eqs. (43) and (44) (see eq. (32)). It can be written in terms of the rate of change of the satellite orbital and internal energies as: S,tot (cid:28)(cid:18) dES dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = = (βB − βS)XiS XjB Z 0 −∞ dsviS ,0C SS iS jB (s)vjB ,0. (49) The correlation matrix is given by eq. (A10) with α = S, γ = S and δ = B. Substituting the expression for C SS iS jB (s) in eq. (49), and performing the integral over ds with the help of eq. (38), we obtain: c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 ′ S,tot Bm2 N S NS (cid:28)(cid:18) dES dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) = G2m2 S(βB − βS) ×XiS XjB "XhS (cid:26) (riS − rhS ) · viS riS − rhS 3 (cid:27) ×(cid:26) [vjB · (rjB − rhS )][(rjB − rhS ) · (vjB − vhS )] rjB − rhS vjB − vhS 2 (rjB − rhS )⊥ 2 − rjB − rhS vjB − vhS 2 (rjB − rhS )⊥ 2 vjB − vhS (rjB − rhS )⊥ 2(cid:27) vjB · (rjB − rhS )⊥ NSZ drdr′nS(r)nS(r′) rjB − rhS 2 (vjB − vhS ) · vjB riS − r 3 rjB − r′ (cid:21) .(50) [(riS − r) · viS ] + + 1 The integrations over velocities can be carried out fol- lowing the same steps as in the previous section and we finally have: σ2 S,tot σ2 B σ2 S mBσ2 B −1(cid:19) G2 SZ driS drjB ρS(riS )ρB(rjB ) T Z drhS ρS(rhS )(cid:26) (riS − rhS ) · vCM S riS − rhS 3 (cid:27) CM S − x2 CM S)erf(αCM S ) (cid:28)(cid:18)dES dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) =(cid:18)mSσ2 ×(cid:20)− ×(cid:26) exp(α2 rjB − rhS NSZ drdr′ρS(r)nS(r′) riS − r 3 rjB − r′ (cid:21) (51) [(riS − r) · vCM S] (cid:27) + 1 where αCM S ≡ xCM S · (rhS −rjB rhS −rjB ) . 4 PARTICULAR LIMITS 4.1 Point-mass satellites In eq. (43) it is implicitly assumed that the distance between a generic satellite particle and a generic background parti- cle cannot be smaller than a scale, dmin, that is, that there exists a minimum effective impact parameter. As the main contribution to the integrals appearing in this expression comes from small rS − rB values (rS and rB are generic satellite and background particle positions), an accurate de- termination of the dmin scale is a crucial point when study- ing dynamical friction. This scale, however, cannot be deter- mined by the present approach to this problem. There exist in literature several estimates of dmin for specific situations (White 1976; Bontekoe & van Albada 1987). White (1976) in fact shows that for spherical symmetric satellites, it is a good approximation to consider them as point-like systems with a cut-off in their distances to background particles, and that for the case of satellites with a King mass distribu- tion (King 1966), this cut-off is given by dmin ≃ Rt 5 , where Rt is the satellite tidal radius. A point mass satellite has a density profile given by ρS(rS) = MSδ(rS − rCM S), where δ(rS − rCM S) is the delta function in three dimensions and rCM S is the position of the satellite center-of-mass. With this value of ρS(rS), eq. (43) gives in the point mass limit: c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Dynamical friction for compound bodies 7 (cid:28)(cid:18) dES S orb σ2 B B mSσ2 S − 1(cid:19) G2M 2 dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) =(cid:18) mBσ2 ×(cid:20)Z drhB ρB(rhB )Θ(rhB ) ×(cid:26) σ2 NB Z drdr′ρB(r)nB(r′)Θ(r)Θ(r′) rCM S − r 3 rCM S − r' (cid:21) [(rCM S − r) · vCM S ] CM S − x2 exp(α2 B σ2 T × + 1 (rCM S − rhB ) · vCM S rCM S − rhB 4 CM S)erf(αCM S ) − 1(cid:27) (52) (rCM S−r hB where now αCM S ≡ xCM S · rCM S−r hB Θ ( rCM S − r −dmin) is the step function. ) and Θ(r) ≡ 4.2 Homogeneous backgrounds. The Chandrasekhar limit When the background density is uniform, we can set ρB(rB) = ρB,0 and rCM S = 0 in eq. (52) and then it be- comes: orb vCM S SρB,0 ln Λ (cid:28)(cid:18) dES S − 1(cid:19) 4πG2M 2 xCM S exp(−x2 dt (cid:19)δt(cid:29) =(cid:18) mBσ2 B mSσ2 2 √π ×[erf(xCM S) − This recovers the Chandrasekhar formula for the motion of a massive test particle in an homogeneous background, ex- cept for the factor containing the temperature ratio (which vanishes in the Chandrasekhar formula because mS ≫ mB in this limit), and, now, σT = (σ2 B)1/2 at the place of the background velocity dispersion. S + σ2 CM S)]. (53) In the Figure 1 we plot the ratio, R, of satellite en- ergy loss in the Chandrasekhar limit with σS = 0 and with σS 6= 0, assuming that TB/TS = 0. As can be seen in this Figure, the effect of a non zero σS increases with increasing σS and is more important at low vCM S . The Chandrasekhar formula always overestimates the dynamical friction force, and in some situations the effect of neglecting the satellite velocity dispersion could cause an error as high as an order of magnitude. 5 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION We have derived an expression giving the orbital energy exchange due to dynamical friction experienced by an ex- tended body, composed of NS bound particles endowed with a velocity spectrum, as it moves interacting with a non ho- mogeneous discrete background. It has been assumed that both, the satellite and the background, have Maxwellian ve- locity distributions and that the background is static. Self-interactions of both satellite and background par- ticles have been taken into account. This results in no effect on their energy exchange. Heating terms appear in quite a natural way in our approach both due to interactions among particles of the 8 R. Dom´ınguez-Tenreiro & M.A. G´omez-Flechoso sented in this paper, has resulted in the derivation of a for- mula that takes into account the space and velocity struc- ture of the satellite. This represents a common situation in many astrophysical processes and, as we have shown, might have important quantitative consequences in the setting-up of timescales for these processes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Drs. G. Gonz´alez-Casado and E. Salvador-Sol´e for interesting informations. M.A. G´omez-Flechoso was sup- ported by the Direcci´on General de Investigaci´on Cient´ıfica y T´ecnica (DGICYT, Spain) through a fellowship. The DGICYT also supported in part this work , grants AEN93-0673 and PB93-0252. REFERENCES Bekenstein, J. D. & Maoz, E., 1992, ApJ, 390, 79 Bekenstein, J. D. & Zamir, D., 1991, ApJ, 359, 427 Binney, J. & Tremaine, S., 1987, Galactic Dynamics. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton Bontekoe, T. R. & van Albada, T. S., 1987, MNRAS, 224, 349 Chandrasekhar, S., 1943, ApJ, 97, 255 Cohen, L., 1975, in Hayli, A., ed., Proc. IAU Symp. 60: Dynamics of Stellar Systems. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 33 Kalnajs, A. J., 1972, in Lecar, M., ed., Proc. IAU Colloq. 10: Gravitational N-body Problem. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 13 Kandrup, H. E., 1980, Phys. Rep., 63, 1 King, I., 1966, AJ, 71, 64 Kubo, R., 1959, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Univ. of Col- orado, vol. 1. Intersciences Publishers, p. 120 Lin, D. N. C. & Tremaine, S., 1983, ApJ, 264, 364 Lynden-Bell, D. & Kalnajs, A., 1972, MNRAS, 157, 1 Mamon, G. A., 1993, in Combes, F. & Athanassoula, E., eds., Gravitational Dynamics and the N-body Problem. Meudon, Paris, p. 188 Maoz, E., 1993, MNRAS, 263, 75 Marochnik, L. S., 1968, SvA, 11, 873 Palmer, P. L. & Papaloizou, J., 1985, MNRAS, 215, 691 Reif, F., 1965, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics. McGraw-Hill, New York Rosenblunth, M. N., Mc Donald, W. M. & Judd, D. L., 1957, Phys. Rev., 107, 1 Saslaw, W. C., 1985, Gravitational Physics of Stellar and Galactic Systems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge Tremaine, S. & Weinberg, M. D., 1984, MNRAS, 209, 729 Weinberg, M. D., 1986, ApJ, 300, 93 Weinberg, M. D., 1989, MNRAS, 239, 549 White, S. D. M., 1976, MNRAS, 174, 467 White, S. D. M., 1983, ApJ, 274, 53 APPENDIX A: THE CORRELATION MATRIX The correlation matrix is defined in eq. (36) with the fluc- tuating forces given by eq. (10). Each matrix is an object with four index, and each index takes on two different val- ues (B and S). This makes sixteen different possibilities, corresponding to the tensorial product of four different pos- sibilities for the F α iγ (t) forces. Writing the Fourier transform of r − r′ −1 and nα(r) with respect to r, the convolution theorem and eq. (10) imply that: c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Figure 1. Ratio, R, of satellite energy loss in the Chandrasekhar limit with σS = 0 and with σS 6= 0, assuming that TB /TS = 0. Lines correspond to different σS /σB ratios from 0.2 to 2.0 (ratio increases as the thickness of the line increses) same kind or of different kind. They are a factor of 1/N smaller than the orbital effects. In the point-like satellite limit (or small as compared with the background size) and constant density background, we obtain an expression that recovers, in the limit σS/σB → 0 and TS/TB → ∞, Chandrasekhar's dynamical friction for- mula (eq. (1)). Its comparison with the energy loss given by eq. (1) allows for a quantification of the effects of having a non zero σS. It has been found out that the energy loss is always smaller in this case, and that the difference can be up to about an order of magnitude for slow satellites as compared with σB. In deriving eq. (35) we have considered time intervals, δt, that are short as compared with the time scale for the variation of the particle velocities and positions. This al- lows us to neglect the effects of the smooth gravitational potential gradients. However, in order to carry out a pre- cise calculation of dynamical friction, the whole history of the system from an early enough time and the interactions along the entire satellite trajectory should have been taken into account. This would have made the problem extremely difficult to solve. Instead, taking only a finite δt, means that interactions with distant particles have not been accurately considered. Nevertheless, we recall that the contribution of particles to dynamical friction quickly decreases with dis- tance, so that this neglect should not result in major conse- quences. The bound of δt has also another consequence: this ap- proach is unable to describe slowly accumulating effects on dynamical friction (Kalnajs 1972) or the effect of reversible dynamical feedback (e.g. Tremaine & Weinberg 1984), be- cause they arise as a consequence of the periodic motion of the satellite after many revolutions. Despite these shortcomings, the fluctuation-dissipation approach to dynamical friction pre- the extension of k2 2π2 Gmαmγ Z dk exp[−ik · rgα (t)] − F α iγ (riγ , t) = −i ×  Xgα6=iγ where nα k ≡Z drnα(r)exp[−ik · r]. With this definition k exp[ik · riγ (t)] N′α Nα nα k  , (A1) (A2) nα k Nα hexp[−ik · riα ]i0 = and then the average of the stochastic forces, eq. (A1), in the unperturbed state vanishes, as required. (A3) Inserting eq. (A1) in eq. (36), we get: C αβ iγ jδ G2mαmβmγ mδ 4π4 k2 dl l2 (s) = − ×Z dk ×*  Xgα6=iγ ×  Xhβ6=jδ k ⊗ l exp[i(k · riγ (0) + l · rjδ (s))] exp[−ik · rgα (0)] − exp[−il · rhβ (s)] − N′α Nα nα k  l + 0 N′β Nβ nβ (A4) (A5) (A6) and eq. (A3) now gives: G2mαmβmγ mδ C αβ iγ jδ k2 4π4 dl l2 (s) = − ×Z dk ×  Xgα6=iγ Xhβ6=jδ k ⊗ l exp[i(k · riγ (0) + l · rjδ (s))] l  where Ekl(gα, hβ, s) ≡ hexp{−i[k · rgα (0) + l · rhβ (s)]}i0. Ekl(gα, hβ, s) − N′α Nα N′β Nβ nα k nβ It is assumed that particles are uncorrelated in the un- perturbed state. Then, if α 6= β, necessarily gα 6= hβ and the average in eq. (A6) factorizes, as corresponding to uncorre- lated variables, giving C αβ (s) = 0. The average also fac- iγ jδ torizes for different particles belonging to the same particle class, i.e., when α = β but gα 6= hα. There are N′α(N′α − 1) such terms, and each of them has the value . When gα = hα, that is, when we consider the same particle, the average does not factorize anymore. Taking this considera- tions into account, the correlation matrix becomes: k nα nα N 2 α l Dynamical friction for compound bodies 9 The position of a generic particle at time s satisfying (19) can be written as: rjα (s) = rjα ,0 + vjα ,0s (A8) An integration of eq. (11) would give four more terms corresponding to the gravitational acceleration and the fluc- tuating forces. The acceleration terms are negligible when compared with vjα,0s (see eq. (19)) and the fluctuating forces would give rise to third order terms. Once this expression for the particle positions at time s is substituted in eq. (A7), the integrals over dk and dl can be easily calculated taking the gradient of the Fourier rep- resentation for the Green's function of the Laplace equation in three dimensions: Z dk k2 k exp[ik · A] = i 2πA A3 . (A9) Finally, combining eqs. (A2), (A6), (A7), (A8) and (A9) the correlation matrix reads: C αα iγ jδ (s) = G2m2 αmγ mδ N′α Nα [rjδ − rhα + s(vjδ − vhα )] rjδ − rhα + s(vjδ − vhα )3 1 (riγ − rhα ) riγ − rhα 3 ⊗ ×"Xhα Nα Z drdr′nα(r)nα(r′) (riγ − r) riγ − r 3 ⊗ − × The 0 subindex have been dropped from the r and v (rjδ − r′ + svjδ ) rjδ − r′ + svjδ 3(cid:21) . (A10) vectors. APPENDIX B: In this appendix we calculate the integral I =Z dvf S M (v) exp(cid:2)γ2 − y2(cid:3) erf(γ), where v is the velocity of class S particles, that is v = vCM S + u, (B1) (B2) whose distribution function, f S in u M , is a Maxwellian isotropic f S M (v) = 1 (2πσ2 S)3/2 exp(cid:20)− (v − vCM S)2 2σ2 S (cid:21) . In the last equation y ≡ v/√2σB, γ ≡ y · ζ, and ζ is a unit constant vector. Expression (B2) implies: (B3) (B4) γ ≡ γCM S + γu where γCM S = vCM S√2σB ζ and γu = uCM S√2σB ζ G2m2 αmγmδ 4π4 C αα iγ jδ (s) = − ×Z dk ×hN′αEkl(gα = hα, s) − N′α dl l2 k2 c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 k ⊗ l exp[i(k · riγ (0) + l · rjδ (s))] nα k nα l N 2 α i . (A7) The definition of the error function and equation (B4) imply that: 10 R. Dom´ınguez-Tenreiro & M.A. G´omez-Flechoso erf(γ) = erf(γCM S) + 2 √π Z γu 0 dt exp(cid:2)−(t + γCM S)2(cid:3) . (B5) We now write I (eq. (B1)) as an integral with respect to the relative velocities u. Taking ζ = (0, 0, 1) we obtain: I = CM S(cid:1) CM S−x2 (2πσ2 S)3/2 Z dux exp(cid:2)− (Aux +Bx)2(cid:3) exp(cid:0)α2 ×Z duy exp(cid:2)− (Auy +By)2(cid:3)Z duz exp"−(cid:18) uz√2σS(cid:19)2# dt exp(cid:2)− (t + γCM S)2(cid:3)(cid:21) (B6) ×(cid:20)erf(γCM S) + where xCM S ≡ vCM S /√2σT , αCM S ≡ xCM S · ζ, σ2 T ≡ S, A ≡ σT /√2σSσB, Bi ≡ σS σ2 B + σ2 xCM S,i, with i = x, y, and γu = uz/√2πσB. The integrals over dux and duy can be easily performed and they give: √π Z γu σB 2 0 (cid:20)√π A erf(∞)(cid:21)2 = π A2 The integral can now be written as: σ2 H σ2 2 π 1 I = where I(a, b) ≡ CM S − x2 I(a, b)i exp(cid:2)α2 a(cid:17)2(cid:21)Z S T herf(γCM S) + aZ ∞ CM S(cid:3) (B7) dt exp(cid:2)−(t + b)2(cid:3) (B8) with a ≡ σS/σH , b ≡ γCM S, comes from the integration on duz. The I(a, b) integral can be evaluated as follows: first, we derive it with respect to b, the we carry out the integration with respect to t, obtaining: ds exp(cid:20)−(cid:16) s −∞ 0 ∂I(a, b) ∂ b =√π(cid:20) 1 (1 + a2)1/2 exp(cid:18)− b2 1 + a2(cid:19)−exp(−b2)(cid:21) (B9) and, finally, an integration on b leads to: I(a, b) = I(a, 0) + π 2 (cid:20)erf(cid:20) b (1 + a2)1/2(cid:21) − erf(b)(cid:21) (B10) with I(a, 0) = 0 because erf(s) = −erf(−s). Substituting the expression for I(a, b) in eq. (B7), we get: I = σ2 B σ2 T CM S − x2 exp(cid:0)α2 CM S(cid:1) erf(αCM S) where now xCM S ≡ vCM S/√2σT and αCM S ≡ xCM S · ζ. (B11) c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10
astro-ph/0211420	1	0211	2002-11-19T12:28:47	Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales - II. Evolution of the Star Cluster System in M82's Fossil Starburst	[ "astro-ph" ]	ABRIDGED: We obtain new age and mass estimates for the star clusters in M82's fossil starburst region B, based on improved fitting methods. Our new age estimates confirm the peak in the age histogram attributed to the last tidal encounter with M81; we find a peak formation epoch at slightly older ages than previously published, log(t_peak / yr) = 9.04, with a Gaussian sigma of Delta log(t_width) = 0.273. Cluster disruption has removed a large fraction of the older clusters. Adopting the expression for the cluster disruption time-scale of t_dis(M)= t_dis^4 (M/10^4 Msun)^gamma with gamma = 0.62 (Paper I), we find that the ratios between the real cluster formation rates in the pre-burst phase (log(t/yr) <= 9.4), the burst-phase (8.4 < log(t/yr) < 9.4) and the post-burst phase (log(t/yr) <= 8.4) are about 1:2:1/40. The mass distribution of the clusters formed during the burst shows a turnover at log(M_cl/Msun) ~ 5.3 which is not caused by selection effects. This distribution can be explained by cluster formation with an initial power-law mass function of slope alpha=2 up to a maximum cluster mass of M_max = 3 x 10^6 Msun, and cluster disruption with a normalisation time-scale t_dis^4 / t_burst = (3.0 +/- 0.3) x 10^{-2}. For a burst age of 1 x 10^9 yr, we find that the disruption time-scale of a cluster of 10^4 Msun is t_dis^4 ~ 3 x 10^7 years, with an uncertainty of approximately a factor of two. This is the shortest disruption time-scale known in any galaxy.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 -- 000 (2001) Printed 27 November 2018 (MN LATEX style file v1.4) Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales -- II. Evolution of the Star Cluster System in M82's Fossil Starburst Richard de Grijs1⋆, Nate Bastian2, and Henny J.G.L.M. Lamers2 1 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA 2 Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands Received date; accepted date ABSTRACT We obtain new age and mass estimates for the star clusters in M82's fossil starburst region B, based on improved fitting methods. Our new age estimates confirm the peak in the age histogram attributed to the last tidal encounter with M81; we find a peak formation epoch at slightly older ages than previously published, log(tpeak/yr) = 9.04, with a Gaussian σ of ∆ log(twidth) = 0.273. The actual duration of the burst of clus- ter formation may have been shorter because uncertainties in the age determinations may have broadened the peak. Our improved mass estimates confirm that the (initial) masses of the M82 B clusters with V ≤ 22.5 mag are mostly in the range 104 − 106M⊙, with a median mass of Mcl = 1.08 × 105M⊙. The formation history of the observed clusters shows a steady decrease towards older ages. This indicates that cluster dis- ruption has removed a large fraction of the older clusters. Adopting the expression for tdis(M ) = tdis 4 (M/104M⊙)γ with γ ≃ 0.62 (Paper I), we find that the ratios between the real cluster formation rates in the pre-burst phase (log(t/yr) ≥ 9.4), the burst-phase (8.4 < log(t/yr) < 9.4) and the post-burst phase (log(t/yr) ≤ 8.4) are about 1 : 2 : 1 40 . The formation rate during the burst may have been higher if the actual duration of the burst was shorter than adopted. The mass distribution of the clusters formed during the burst shows a turnover at log(Mcl/M⊙) ≃ 5.3 which is not caused by selection effects. This distribution can be explained by cluster formation with an initial power-law mass function of slope α = 2 up to a maximum cluster mass of Mmax = 3 × 106M⊙, and cluster disruption with a 4 /tburst = (3.0 ± 0.3) × 10−2. For a burst age of 1 × 109 yr, normalisation time-scale tdis we find that the disruption time-scale of a cluster of 104 M⊙ is tdis 4 ∼ 3 × 107 years, with an uncertainty of approximately a factor of two. This is the shortest disruption time-scale known in any galaxy. the cluster disruption time-scale of Key words: diffusion -- galaxies: individual: M82 -- galaxies: starburst -- galaxies: star clusters 2 0 0 2 v o N 9 1 1 v 0 2 4 1 1 2 0 / h p - o r t s a : v i X r a 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Multiple starbursts in M82 M82 is often regarded as the "prototype" starburst galaxy. Observations over the entire wavelength range, from radio waves to X-rays (see, e.g., Telesco 1988 and Rieke et al. 1993 for reviews), seem to support a scenario in which tidal interactions, predominantly with its large neighbour M81, triggered intense star formation in the centre of this small ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] c(cid:13) 2001 RAS irregular galaxy during the last several 100 Myr. The result- ing starburst, with the high star formation rate of ∼ 10M⊙ yr−1, has continued up to about 50 Myr ago (e.g., O'Connell & Mangano 1978, Rieke et al. 1993). Energy and gas ejec- tion from supernovae and combined stellar winds drive a large-scale galactic wind along the minor axis of M82 (e.g., Lynds & Sandage 1963, McCarthy et al. 1987, Shopbell & Bland-Hawthorn 1998). All of the bright radio and infrared sources associated with the active starburst are found in a small region within a radius of ∼ 250 pc from the galaxy's centre, but most of this volume is heavily obscured by dust at optical wavelengths. 2 R. de Grijs, N. Bastian, and H.J.G.L.M. Lamers However, there is now compelling evidence that the ac- tive starburst was not the only major starburst event to have occurred in M82. A region at ∼ 400 − 1000 pc from the centre, "M82 B" (nomenclature from O'Connell & Mangano 1978), has the high surface brightness and spectral features expected for an ancient starburst with an age in excess of several 100 Myr and an amplitude similar to the active burst (O'Connell & Mangano 1978, Marcum & O'Connell 1996, de Grijs et al. 2001, hereafter dGOG). Its spectral features re- semble the characteristics of the anomalous "E+A" spectra found in distant galaxy clusters, which are generally inter- preted as the signature of a truncated burst of star forma- tion that occurred 100 − 1000 Myr earlier (e.g., Couch & Sharples 1987, Dressler & Gunn 1990, Couch et al. 1998). It is thought that these starbursts are closely related to the process by which disc galaxies are converted into elliptical or lenticular galaxies and they are thought to result from tidal interactions, mergers, or perhaps ram-pressure stripping by the intergalactic medium (Butcher & Oemler 1978, Oemler 1992, Barger et al. 1996). The significance of the detailed study of M82's star- burst environment lies, therefore, in the broader context of galaxy evolution. Starbursts of this scale are likely to be common features of early galaxy evolution, and M82 is the nearest analogue to the sample of star-forming galaxies re- cently identified at high redshifts (z & 3; Steidel et al. 1996, Giavalisco et al. 1997, Lowenthal et al. 1997). In addition, M82 affords a close-up view not only of an active starburst -- in M82 A, C and E -- but also, in region B and elsewhere, of the multiple post-burst phases. In a recent study focusing on the fossil starburst site, M82 B, we found a large population of (∼ 110) evolved com- pact star clusters (dGOG), whose properties appear to be consistent with them being evolved (and therefore faded) counterparts of the young (super) star clusters detected in the galaxy's active core (O'Connell et al. 1995). Based on broad-band optical and near-infrared colours and compari- son with stellar evolutionary synthesis models, we estimated ages for the M82 B cluster population from ∼ 30 Myr to over 10 Gyr, with a peak near 650 Myr (see also de Grijs 2001). About 22 per cent of the clusters in M82 B are older than 2 Gyr, with a roughly flat distribution to over 10 Gyr. Very few clusters are younger than 300 Myr. The full-width of the peak at 650 Myr is ∼ 500 Myr, but this is undoubt- edly broadened by the various uncertainties entering the age-dating process. The selection bias of the star clusters in dGOG is such that the truncation of cluster formation for ages < 300 Myr is better established than the roughly constant formation rate at ages > 2 Gyr. Thus, we suggested steady, continuing cluster formation in M82 B at a very modest rate at early times (> 2 Gyr ago) followed by a concentrated formation episode lasting from 400 -- 1000 Myr ago and a subsequent suppression of cluster formation (dGOG). 1.2 Cluster disruption time-scales the star cluster system in M82's fossil starburst region, we determine both its cluster formation history and the char- acteristic disruption time-scales. The dynamical evolution of star clusters is determined by a combination of internal and external time-scales. The free-fall and two-body relaxation time-scales, which depend explicitly on the initial cluster mass density (e.g., Spitzer 1957, Chernoff & Weinberg 1990, de la Fuente Marcos 1997, Portegies Zwart et al. 2001), affect the cluster-internal pro- cesses of star formation and mass redistribution through en- ergy equipartition, leading to mass segregation and, even- tually, core collapse (see, e.g., de Grijs et al. [2002a,b] for a detailed description of mass segregation effects in young star clusters). While the internal relaxation process will, over time, eject both high-mass stars from the core (e.g., due to interactions with hard binaries; see Brandl et al. 2001, de Grijs et al. 2002a) and lose lower-mass stars from its halo through diffusion (e.g., due to Roche-lobe overflow), the ex- ternal process of tidal disruption and stripping by the sur- rounding galactic field is in general more important for the discussion of the disruption of star clusters. Tidal disruptive processes are enhanced by "normal" stellar evolutionary effects such as mass loss by winds and/or supernova explosions, which will further reduce the stellar density in a cluster, and thus make it more sensitive to ex- ternal tidal forces. From the bimodal age distribution of (young) open and (old) globular clusters in the Milky Way, Oort (1957) con- cluded that disruption of Galactic star clusters must occur on time-scales of ∼ 5×108 yr. Around the same time, Spitzer (1957) derived an expression for the disruption time scale as a function of a cluster's mean density, ρc (M⊙ pc−3): tdis = 1.9 × 108ρc yr, for 2.2 < ρc < 22M⊙ pc−3. More advanced recent studies, based on N-body modeling, have shown that the cluster disruption time-scale is sensitive to the cluster mass, the fraction of binary (or multiple) stars, and the initial mass function (IMF) adopted (e.g., Chernoff & Weinberg 1990, de la Fuente Marcos 1997). Boutloukos & Lamers (2001, 2002) derived an empiri- cal relation between the disruption time and a cluster's ini- tial mass for the Milky Way, the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), M33 and the inner spiral arms of M51. They showed, based on an analysis of the mass and age distributions of magnitude-limited samples of clusters, that the empirical disruption time of clusters depends on their initial mass (Mi) as tdis = tdis 4 (Mi/104M⊙)γ (1) 4 where tdis is the disruption time of a cluster of initial mass Mi = 104M⊙. The value of γ is approximately the same in these four galaxies, γ = 0.62 ± 0.06. However, the char- acteristic disruption time-scale tdis is widely different in the different galaxies. The disruption time-scale is longest in the SMC (∼ 8 Gyr) and shortest in the inner spiral arms of M51 (∼ 40 Myr). We will derive the disruption time-scale of clus- ters in M82 B and allow for disruption in the determination of the cluster formation history. 4 In the determination of the cluster formation history from the age distribution of magnitude-limited cluster samples, cluster disruption must be taken into account. This is be- cause the observed age distribution is that of the surviving clusters only. Therefore, in this study of the evolution of In Section 2, we will summarise the observations on which our discussion is based, and in Section 3 we ob- tain new age and mass estimates for the clusters in M82 B, based on the 3/2DEF method (3/2-dimensional energy- fitting method; Bik et al. 2002) of fitting the observed spec- c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales -- II. 3 tral energy distribution to that of cluster evolution models. In Section 4 we derive the cluster formation history and the characteristic cluster disruption time-scale. In Section 5 we discuss the mass distribution of the clusters formed during the burst. The methods and assumptions are discussed in Section 6; finally, we will summarise and conclude the paper in Section 7. 2 OBSERVATIONS The observations on which our analysis of the M82 clus- ter formation history is based were described in detail in dGOG. Briefly summarised, we observed region B with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) on board the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) through the F439W, F555W and F814W filters, roughly corresponding to the standard Johnson-Cousins B, V and I passbands, respectively. We obtained WFPC2 observations using two pointings, so that the entire region B was covered by the Planetary Camera (PC) chip, the highest-resolution optical imaging instru- ment available on board HST at that time, with a pixel size of 0.0455′′. The effective integration times used for the F439W, F555W, and F814W observations were 4400s, 2500s and 2200s, respectively, for the western half of M82 B and 4100s, 3100s and 2200s, respectively, for the eastern half closest to the galaxy's starburst core. In addition, we imaged the entire region with HST's Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS) (Camera 2; pixel size 0.075′′) in both the F110W and F160W filters (comparable to the Bessell J and H filters, respectively), in a tiled pattern of 2×4 partially overlapping exposures. The integrations, with effective integration times of 768s for each of the eastern and western halfs of M82 B and each filter, were taken in MULTIACCUM mode to preserve dynamic range and to correct for cosmic rays. We subsequently obtained integrated photometry for the extended objects (i.e., star clusters) in M82 B down to a 50 per cent completeness limit of V ≃ 23.3 mag. Because of the highly variable background and the numerous spuri- ous features due to dust lanes and background variations, we decided to select only genuine star cluster brighter than V = 22.5 for further analysis, corresponding to close to 100 per cent completeness (dGOG). 3 OBSERVED CLUSTER MASS AND AGE DISTRIBUTIONS For the final 113 objects obtained following the procedures outlined in the previous section, dGOG used (B − V ) versus (V − I) colour-colour diagrams to disentangle age and ex- tinction effects, since the age and extinction vectors are not entirely degenerate for this choice of optical colours. Accurate age and mass determinations are essential for the analysis of cluster formation and disruption time-scales performed in this paper. Combining the observed luminosi- ties of the M82 B star cluster population with the appropri- ate, age-dependent mass-to-light ratios from spectral syn- thesis models provided us with photometric mass estimates with an accuracy of well within an order of magnitude. In- dependent dynamical mass estimates from high-resolution c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 spectroscopy are available only for a few of the most lumi- nous super star clusters seen in the nearest starburst galax- ies (M82, the Antennae, NGC 1569 and NGC 1705), and are approximately 106M⊙ (Ho & Filippenko 1996a,b, Smith & Gallagher 2000, Mengel et al. 2002). Because of the prox- imity of M82, we have been able to probe the young cluster population in M82 B to fainter absolute magnitudes, and thus lower masses, than has been possible before in other starburst galaxies. Other young star cluster samples are bi- ased towards high masses by selection effects due to their host galaxies' greater distances. Keeping the importance of the age dependence on our photometric mass estimates in mind, we decided to redeter- mine the M82 B cluster ages using the full parameter space available. We obtained more accurate age determinations by also including the NICMOS observations, and solving for the best-fitting ages matching the full spectral energy distribu- tions (SEDs) of our sample clusters, from the F439W to the F160W passband. We compared the observed cluster SEDs with the model predictions for an instantaneous burst of star formation, assuming a Salpeter IMF from 0.1 − 100M⊙ with power-law slope αIMF = 2.35 to obtain our new estimates for the cluster age t, initial mass Mcl and extinction E(B − V ); for the latter we adopted the (Galactic) extinction law of Scuderi et al. (1996). For ages t ≤ 109 yr we used the Star- burst99 models (Leitherer et al. 1999), while for older ages we used the most recent single stellar population models by Bruzual & Charlot (2000, hereafter BC00). Examples of our model fits to the observed cluster SEDs are shown in Fig. 1. We realise that recent determinations of the stellar IMF deviate significantly from a Salpeter-type IMF at low masses, in the sense that the low-mass stellar IMF is sig- nificantly flatter than the Salpeter slope. The implication of using a Salpeter-type IMF for our cluster mass deter- minations is therefore that we have overestimated the indi- vidual cluster masses (although the relative mass distribu- tion of our entire cluster sample remains unaffected). There- fore, we used the more modern IMF of Kroupa, Tout & Gilmore (1993, hereafter KTG) to determine the correc- tion factor, C, between our masses and the more realistic masses obtained from the KTG IMF (both normalised at 1.0M⊙). This IMF is characterised by slopes of α = −2.7 for m > 1.0M⊙, α = −2.2 for 0.5 ≤ m/M⊙ ≤ 1.0, and −1.85 < α < −0.70 for 0.08 < m/M⊙ ≤ 0.5. Depending on the adopted slope for the lowest mass range, we have there- fore overestimated our individual cluster masses by a factor of 1.70 < C < 3.46 for an IMF containing stellar masses in the range 0.1 ≤ m/M⊙ ≤ 100. The fitting of the observed cluster SEDs to the Starburst99 and BC00 models was done using a three- dimensional maximum likelihood method, 3/2DEF, with the initial mass Mi, age and extinction E(B − V ) as free param- eters (see Bik et al. 2002). For the 46 clusters with upper limits in one or more filters we used a two-dimensional maxi- mum likelihood fit, using the extinction probability distribu- tion for E(B −V ). This distribution was derived for the clus- ters with well-defined SEDs over the full wavelength range (see Bik et al. 2002). We obtained reliable age estimates based on the full SED modeling for 81 of the 113 clusters. The new age and mass estimates for these 81 clusters are listed in Table 1, where the individual clusters are identified by their dGOG ID. The dGOG mass estimates in Table 1 4 R. de Grijs, N. Bastian, and H.J.G.L.M. Lamers Table 1. New age, mass and extinction determinations for the M82 B clusters, and comparison with previously published values. Object log(Age/yr) This paper log(m/M⊙ )a E(B − V ) (mag) log(Age/yr) log(m/M⊙ ) dGOG min best max min best max min best max E(B − V ) (mag)b B1-01 B1-02 B1-04 B1-05 B1-06 B1-07 B1-08 B1-09 B1-10 B1-11 B1-12 B1-14 B1-16 B1-17 B1-18 B1-20 B1-22 B1-24 B1-25 B1-26 B1-27 B1-28 B1-29 B1-32 B1-34 B1-35 B1-36 B1-37 B1-38 B1-39 B1-40 B1-43 B2-01 B2-04 B2-05 B2-07 B2-08 B2-12 B2-13 B2-14 B2-17 B2-18 B2-21 B2-22 B2-25 B2-26 B2-28 B2-29 B2-30 B2-31 B2-32 B2-33 B2-34 B2-36 B2-37 B2-38 B2-39 B2-40 B2-41 B2-43 B2-44 B2-45 B2-47 B2-48 B2-50 B2-51 B2-52 B2-54 B2-55 B2-56 B2-57 B2-59 B2-60 B2-62 B2-64 B2-65 B2-67 B2-68 B2-69 B2-70 9.16 8.96 5.10 9.74 5.10 8.96 8.51 5.10 5.10 8.71 8.71 8.51 8.56 8.66 8.86 9.01 8.56 8.66 8.91 5.10 8.76 8.86 5.10 8.76 5.10 8.61 8.96 9.16 5.10 8.81 5.10 9.01 9.01 9.01 5.10 8.66 8.66 9.74 9.30 8.71 8.96 5.10 6.86 8.96 5.10 8.71 5.10 5.10 8.41 5.10 8.81 5.10 5.10 9.16 6.84 5.10 8.71 8.41 8.96 8.66 5.10 8.71 9.01 5.10 5.10 8.96 8.96 5.10 8.56 8.86 8.86 5.10 5.10 8.76 8.96 8.91 8.81 8.86 8.86 8.76 9.88 9.28 8.46 10.05 6.58 9.01 8.66 8.91 8.71 8.86 9.01 8.86 9.95 9.01 8.91 9.16 8.76 8.86 9.01 8.61 8.86 8.86 8.76 9.01 6.84 8.86 10.14 9.40 8.81 9.34 8.66 9.48 9.94 9.23 8.46 8.96 9.01 9.76 9.83 9.44 9.48 7.49 7.00 10.20 8.51 8.76 7.49 6.66 8.71 8.51 9.16 8.71 6.48 9.16 7.14 8.76 8.76 8.46 9.01 8.86 8.66 9.01 9.26 8.61 7.68 10.14 9.01 8.66 8.71 9.26 9.23 8.21 8.76 8.96 9.23 9.11 8.91 9.16 8.96 8.81 10.05 9.36 8.81 10.15 8.76 9.16 8.66 9.01 8.86 8.86 9.21 9.01 10.30 9.16 8.91 9.16 8.86 8.91 9.26 8.66 8.91 8.86 8.91 9.01 8.36 9.01 10.30 9.44 8.96 9.44 8.76 9.68 10.25 9.28 8.71 9.41 10.26 9.80 9.90 10.14 9.80 8.66 7.60 10.30 8.81 8.76 8.36 8.71 9.01 8.71 9.60 9.01 8.71 9.21 7.65 8.96 8.81 8.56 9.01 8.91 8.76 9.70 9.32 8.81 8.51 10.30 9.01 8.71 8.76 9.36 9.41 8.96 8.86 9.01 9.30 9.16 8.96 9.30 8.96 8.81 5.20 4.66 4.14 5.76 4.33 5.53 5.14 3.14 3.14 5.36 4.81 5.11 4.94 4.47 5.54 5.48 5.23 5.15 5.00 3.09 4.44 5.97 3.52 4.64 3.31 5.02 5.13 5.75 3.57 4.29 2.79 4.35 4.43 5.23 4.14 5.41 5.49 6.86 5.38 4.75 5.21 4.09 4.46 4.53 3.90 5.60 3.51 2.95 4.99 3.21 5.05 3.03 2.97 5.32 4.42 3.08 4.56 5.07 5.91 5.15 3.57 5.00 4.12 3.32 3.54 5.13 4.66 3.39 3.87 4.76 5.21 3.69 3.46 4.05 4.25 5.02 5.22 4.51 4.09 4.97 5.62 4.90 5.21 5.95 4.53 5.60 5.24 4.24 4.33 5.38 4.88 5.24 5.63 4.56 5.56 5.65 5.29 5.20 5.10 4.26 4.49 5.97 4.71 4.69 3.39 5.08 5.90 5.88 4.63 4.58 3.97 4.69 5.09 5.44 5.21 5.55 5.60 6.88 5.71 5.13 5.56 4.79 4.57 5.36 5.01 5.62 4.09 3.21 5.12 4.29 5.23 4.27 3.32 5.34 4.70 4.34 4.57 5.08 5.92 5.20 4.61 5.09 4.36 4.52 4.24 5.90 4.67 4.44 3.94 5.00 5.42 4.73 4.48 4.12 4.48 5.12 5.25 4.69 4.14 4.99 5.74 4.98 5.34 6.03 5.54 5.69 5.24 4.34 4.41 5.41 5.02 5.28 5.87 4.68 5.56 5.65 5.33 5.23 5.23 4.32 4.51 5.97 4.78 4.72 4.44 5.12 6.01 5.91 4.71 4.70 4.03 4.87 5.34 5.47 5.35 5.78 6.35 6.91 5.77 5.63 5.81 5.44 5.17 5.47 5.14 5.62 4.65 4.22 5.19 4.39 5.50 4.42 4.19 5.36 5.11 4.52 4.62 5.14 5.92 5.23 4.64 5.51 4.42 4.61 4.69 6.01 4.71 4.47 3.98 5.10 5.55 5.00 4.54 4.14 4.55 5.20 5.27 4.77 4.16 4.99 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.52 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.18 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.26 0.04 0.00 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.44 0.16 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.54 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.20 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.24 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.20 0.16 0.70 0.06 0.60 0.08 0.04 0.72 0.64 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.50 0.24 0.02 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.56 0.08 0.04 0.68 0.14 0.46 0.20 0.34 0.10 0.68 0.28 0.60 0.20 0.28 0.14 0.62 0.34 0.50 0.00 0.12 0.40 0.26 0.74 0.24 0.36 0.64 0.04 0.48 0.58 0.24 0.60 0.28 0.78 0.58 0.02 0.16 0.70 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.12 0.60 0.36 0.12 0.64 0.52 0.34 0.06 0.58 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.72 0.64 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.04 0.04 10.24 9.27 8.78 10.14 8.67 9.03 8.68 8.89 8.76 8.84 9.03 8.89 10.00 9.03 8.85 9.10 8.78 8.83 9.05 8.68 8.86 8.86 8.81 8.98 7.55 8.88 10.14 9.32 8.83 9.28 8.68 9.70 10.00 9.32 8.66 9.19 9.72 9.70 9.76 10.13 9.46 9.23 8.90 10.26 8.71 8.77 7.26 8.71 8.89 8.65 9.83 8.83 8.56 9.20 7.51 8.83 8.83 8.51 9.00 8.81 8.70 9.93 9.28 8.68 8.31 8.63 9.01 8.68 8.78 9.23 9.26 8.75 8.78 8.95 9.26 9.03 8.90 9.20 8.85 8.81 5.92 4.90 5.25 6.04 5.46 5.53 5.24 4.21 4.33 5.36 4.81 5.13 5.63 4.50 5.50 5.60 5.26 5.15 4.97 4.33 4.46 5.90 4.68 4.65 3.94 4.98 5.91 5.80 4.60 4.53 3.97 4.90 5.16 5.51 5.28 5.56 5.89 6.83 5.66 5.64 5.52 5.69 5.82 5.39 5.05 5.63 3.91 4.21 5.05 4.34 5.70 4.23 4.08 5.38 4.97 4.42 4.65 5.10 5.86 4.54 4.61 5.70 4.39 4.50 4.57 3.90 4.67 4.44 4.03 4.98 5.40 4.82 4.49 4.09 4.52 5.01 5.11 4.70 4.04 4.97 0.31 0.04 0.58 0.18 0.44 0.12 0.09 0.00 0.18 0.09 0.06 0.34 0.40 0.17 0.15 0.07 0.25 0.13 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.25 0.10 0.35 0.24 0.24 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.00 0.15 0.32 0.43 0.77 0.22 0.19 0.43 0.26 1.03 1.13 0.15 0.29 0.14 0.60 0.25 0.37 0.24 0.37 0.24 0.29 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.20 0.00 0.12 0.37 0.00 0.24 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.65 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.35 0.07 0.00 0.03 Notes: a based on a Salpeter-type IMF; comparison with results from more modern IMFs (e.g., KTG) implies that we have overestimated our individual cluster masses by a factor of about 1.7 -- 3.5, depending on the adopted IMF slope for the lowest stellar masses (see Sect. 3); b E(B − V ) = AV /3.1. c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales -- II. 5 (a) (c) (e) (b) (d) (f) Figure 1. Examples of a few fits of the Starburst99 and BC00 models (dashed lines) to the observed cluster SEDs sampled in the B, V, I, J, and H passbands (data points with error bars), representative of clusters throughout the entire age range (age increases from panel a to f). The best-fitting model SEDs are based on the 3/2DEF maximum likelihood method. were determined by combining the absolute magnitudes of the clusters with their age-dependent mass-to-light ratios. Our analysis in both dGOG and the present paper is based on the assumption of solar metallicity, which should be a reasonable match to the young objects in M82 (Gal- lagher & Smith 1999; see also Fritze-v. Alvensleben & Ger- hard 1994), but the effects of varying the metallicity between one-fifth and 2.5 times solar are small compared to the pho- tometric uncertainties (see also dGOG). We therefore assert that our results are not significantly affected by possibly varying metallicities. Ongoing analysis (Parmentier, de Grijs & Gilmore, 2002) suggests that this assumption was indeed justified. We should caution, however, that we have only been able to sample the star clusters located close to the surface of region B, as evidenced by the derived extinction estimates: dGOG find AV . 1 mag in general, while our new determinations (this paper) restrict the extinction even more, to AV . 0.2 mag for the clusters with well-determined ages, and possibly up to AV ∼ 0.40 − 0.55 for some of the others. In Fig. 2 we compare the age and mass estimates from the more sophisticated 3/2DEF method used in this pa- per with the corresponding parameters obtained by dGOG based on their location in the (B − V ) vs. (V − I) di- c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 6 R. de Grijs, N. Bastian, and H.J.G.L.M. Lamers agrams. The black dots represent clusters for which the range between the minimum and maximum plausible ages, log(Age[max])−log(Age[min]) ≤ 1.0; the open circles are ob- jects with more uncertain age determinations. We conclude that the new age and mass determinations are consistent with the dGOG values; this consistency is better for the photometric cluster mass estimates than for their ages, as shown by the larger scatter in Fig. 2a with respect to panel b. However, we also note that the age and mass distributions obtained for the subsample with well-determined ages and for the full sample are internally consistent. Fig. 3 shows the distribution of the M82 B clusters in the age vs. mass plane. It is immediately clear that the lower mass limit increases with increasing cluster age. The vari- ous (solid, dashed and dotted) lines overplotted on the figure show that this is indeed the expected effect of normal evolu- tionary fading of a synthetic single stellar population of an instantaneously formed cluster. For ages ≤ 109 yr, we show the unreddened fading line for clusters with a limiting mag- nitude of V = 22.5 at the distance of M82 (m−M = 27.8; see dGOG), and various choices for the IMF (indicated in the figure are the IMF slope αIMF, and the lower and upper mass cut-offs), predicted by the Starburst99 models ("SB99"). For older ages (t ≥ 109 yr), we show its extension predicted by the BC00 models. These predicted lower limits agree well with our data points. 4 THE DERIVED CLUSTER FORMATION HISTORY 4.1 Cluster age and mass distributions The cluster age and mass distributions for the M82 B cluster sample are shown in Figs. 4a and b. Our new age estimates confirm the peak in the age histogram at- tributed to the last tidal encounter with M81 by dGOG. For the subsample of clusters with well-determined ages (shaded histogram), we find a peak formation epoch at log(tpeak/yr) = 9.04 (tpeak ≃ 1.10 Gyr), with a Gaussian σ of ∆ log(twidth) = 0.27, corresponding to a FWHM of ∆ log(twidth) = 0.64. The corresponding numbers for the full sample are log(tpeak/yr) = 8.97 (tpeak ≃ 0.93 Gyr) for the peak of cluster formation, and for σ, ∆ log(twidth) = 0.35 (FWHM, ∆ log(twidth) = 0.82). In dGOG (see also de Grijs 2001), we concluded that there is a strong peak of cluster formation at ∼ 650 Myr ago, which have formed over a pe- riod of ∼ 500 Myr, but very few clusters are younger than log(t/yr) ≃ 8.5 (t ≃ 300 Myr). Our new age estimates date the event triggering the starburst to be slightly older than the value of 650 Myr derived by dGOG. Our estimate of the duration of the burst should be considered an upper limit, because uncertainties in the cluster age determination may have broadened the peak in Fig. 4a. At the distance from the centre of region B, one would expect M82's differential rotation (cf. Shen & Lo 1995) to have caused the starburst area to disperse on these time- scales. The reason why the fossil starburst region has re- mained relatively well constrained is likely found in the com- plex structure of the disc. It is well-known that the inner ∼ 1 kpc of M82 is dominated by a stellar bar (e.g., Wills et al. 2000) in solid-body rotation. From observations in other galaxies, it appears to be a common feature that central bars are often surrounded by a ring-like structure. If this is also true for M82, it is reasonable to assume that stars in the ring are trapped, and therefore cannot move very much in radius because of dynamical resonance effects. The phase mixing around the ring might be slow enough for a specific part of the ring to keep its identity over a sufficient time so as to appear like region B (see de Grijs 2001): if the diffusion ve- locity around the ring is sufficiently small, any specific region would remain self-constrained for several rotation periods. In addition, since the density in the region is high (see Sect. 6.1), simple calculations imply that the area's self-gravity is non-negligible compared to the rotational shear, therefore also prohibiting a rapid dispersion of the fossil starburst re- gion. The improved mass estimates also confirm that the (ini- tial) masses of the young clusters in M82 B with V ≤ 22.5 mag are mostly in the range 104 − 106M⊙, with a me- dian of 105M⊙ (dGOG). In fact, based on a Gaussian fit, we find that the mean mass of our M82 B cluster sample is log(Mcl/M⊙) = 5.03 and 4.88 for the subsample with well-determined ages and the full sample, respectively, cor- responding to Mcl = 1.1×105 and 0.8×105M⊙, respectively. 4.2 Cluster disruption and the cluster formation history In Figs. 4c and d we show the formation rate and the mass spectrum of the observed clusters in M82 B. The open cir- cles were derived for the entire sample, whereas the filled data points represent only those clusters for which we could obtain good age estimates. These distributions depend on the cluster formation history and on the cluster disruption time-scale of M82 B. As shown by Boutloukos & Lamers (2002, hereafter Pa- per I), with only a few well-justified assumptions, the mass and age distributions of a magnitude-limited sample of star clusters in a given galaxy can be predicted both accurately and robustly, despite the complex physical processes under- lying the assumptions (for a full discussion see Paper I). If all of the following conditions are met: (i) the cluster formation rate, dN(Mcl) constant; dt = S × M −α cl , is (ii) the slope α of the cluster IMF is constant with N (Mcl)dM ∝ M −α cl dM ; (iii) stellar evolution causes clusters to fade as Fλ ∼ t−ζ, as predicted by cluster evolution models; and 4 × (Mcl/104M⊙)γ , where tdis 4 (iv) the cluster disruption time depends on their initial mass as tdis = tdis is the disrup- tion time-scale of a cluster with Mcl = 104M⊙. It is well- established, however, that the disruption time-scale does not only depend on mass, but also on the initial cluster density and internal velocity dispersion (e.g., Spitzer 1957, Cher- noff & Weinberg 1990, de la Fuente Marcos 1997, Portegies Zwart et al. 2001). Following the approach adopted in Pa- per I, however, we point out that if clusters are approxi- mately in pressure equilibrium with their environment, we can expect the density of all clusters in a limited volume of a galaxy to be roughly similar, so that their disruption time-scale will predominantly depend on their (initial) mass (with the exception of clusters on highly-eccentric orbits). In c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales -- II. 7 Figure 2. Comparison between (a) the age and (b) mass estimates of dGOG based on BVI photometry and new estimates using additional JH observations and a full-parameter fitting routine as described in the text. The black dots represent clusters for which the total age range obtained is (log(Age[max]) − log(Age[min])) ≤ 1.0; the open circles are objects with more uncertain age determinations. They show a larger scatter than the black dots, but both distributions are internally consistent. the opposite case that the initial cluster density ρ depends on their mass M in a power-law fashion, e.g., ρ ∼ M x with x being the (arbitrary) power-law exponent, the disruption time-scale will also depend on mass if tdis ∼ M aρb (Paper I). then it can be shown easily that the age distribution of the observed cluster population will obey the following approx- imate power-law behaviours (see Paper I): • dNcl/dt ∝ tζ(1−α) for young clusters due to fading; • dNcl/dt ∝ t(1−α)/γ for old clusters due to disruption. Similarly the mass spectrum of the observed clusters will be • dNcl/dMcl ∝ M (1/ζ)−α cl for low-mass clusters due to For the clusters in M82 B the situation is more com- plex, because the cluster formation rate was certainly not constant. In fact the distribution in Fig. 4c suggests that we can distinguish three phases, which we will discuss sepa- rately. We will assume that the cluster formation rate has been constant within each phase, but may differ strongly among the phases. We adopt a cluster IMF of slope α = 2.0 (Harris & Pudritz 1994; McLaughlin & Pudritz 1996; Elmegreen & Efremov 1997; Zhang & Fall 1999; Bik et al. 2002). We will also adopt a slope ζ = 0.648 for the evolutionary fading of clusters in the V band, derived from the Starburst99 clus- ter models (see also Paper I). For the mass scaling of the disruption time-scale we adopt γ = 0.62 (Paper I). fading; • dNcl/dMcl ∝ M γ−α cl for high-mass clusters due to dis- ruption. So both distributions will show a double power law with slopes determined by α, ζ and γ. The crossing points are determined by the cluster formation rate and the character- istic disruption time-scale of a cluster with an initial mass of 104M⊙, tdis 4 . In Paper I we showed that the observed age and mass distributions of the star cluster systems in four well-studied galaxies indeed show the predicted double power-law be- haviour. From the analysis of these observed distributions Boutloukos & Lamers (2002) showed that the value of γ is approximately constant, (γ = 0.62 ± 0.06), under the very different environmental conditions in the four galaxies, but the characteristic disruption time-scales differ significantly from galaxy to galaxy. c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 (i) The pre-burst phase, at log(t/yr) ≥ 9.4. The age dis- tribution of this earliest phase is represented by only three age-bins of high age at log(t/yr) ≥ 9.4. The predicted slope is (1 − α)/γ = −1.61. We have fitted a straight line through the last three age-bins with this slope. We see that the pre- dicted slope matches the observations within the uncertain- ties. (ii) The burst phase, in the approximate time interval 8.4 < log(t/yr) ≤ 9.4. Its distribution can be fitted with a line of the same predicted slope of −1.61. This is also shown in Fig. 4c. The predicted slope fits the observations very well. We see that this disruption line of the burst-phase is higher than in the pre-burst phase by (0.3 ± 0.1) dex. This implies that the cluster formation rate during the burst was approximately a factor of 2 higher than before. However, this factor depends on the assumed duration of the burst. 8 R. de Grijs, N. Bastian, and H.J.G.L.M. Lamers Figure 3. Distribution of the M82 B clusters in the (age vs. mass) plane. The symbol coding is as in Fig. 2. Overplotted for ages up to 1.0 Gyr are the expected detection limits in the (age vs. mass) plane, predicted by Starburst99 for a range of IMFs; for older ages, we use the BC00 models for a standard IMF, as indicated in the figure legend. These model predictions are based on a detection limit of V = 22.5 and (m − M )M82 = 27.8, assuming no extinction. For a nominal extinction of AV = 0.2 mag, expected for the clusters with well-determined ages, the detection limit is expected to shift to higher masses by ∆ log(Mcl/M⊙) = 0.08, which is well within the uncertainties associated with our mass determinations. The features around 10 Myr are caused by the appearance of red supergiants. The duration of the burst may have been shorter than the value of ∆ log(t) = 1.0 suggested by the figure, because un- certainties in the derived cluster ages may have broadened the burst peak. If the duration of the burst was a factor X shorter than we adopted, then the overall cluster forma- tion rate during the burst was a factor X higher than we estimated. (iii) The post-burst phase, at log(t/yr) < 8.4. The age distribution of this most recent, post-burst phase extends from 6.0 ≤ log(t/yr) ≤ 8.4. Unless the disruption time was extremely short with tdis of order a few Myr (which is contradicted by the analysis of the mass distribution in the burst, see Sect. 5), the age distribution of the youngest bins is governed by the fading of the clusters and the detection limit. Despite the rather large uncertainties for young ages, log(t/yr) < 7.0, we find a best-fitting slope 4 ζ(1 − α) = −0.57 ± 0.05, so that ζ = 0.57 ± 0.05 (for- mal uncertainty, not including the large error bars) for a mass-function slope α = 2 (dotted line in Fig. 4c). This is, within the rather large uncertainties, similar to the value of ζ ≃ 0.65 expected from the Starburst99 and BC00 models. Therefore we have assumed a fading line with the predicted slope ζ(1 − α) = −0.65 for the youngest three age bins. The age bins in the range of 7.0 ≤ log(t/yr) ≤ 8.4 fall below the extrapolated fading line. The difference is about one dex at log(t/yr) ≃ 8, although the number of observed clusters is small. This suggest that the number of clusters for ages t & 107 yr is already affected by disruption. We can fit a disruption line with the predicted slope of −1.61 through the data points, despite their rather large uncertainties. We see that the best-fitting line is displaced by (−1.6 ± 0.1) dex compared to the pre-burst disruption line. This shows that c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales -- II. 9 Figure 4. (a) and (b) -- Age and mass distributions of the M82 B clusters, redetermined in this paper using improved methods. The shaded histograms correspond to the clusters with (log(Age[max]) − log(Age[min]) ≤ 1.0; the open histograms represent the entire cluster sample. (c) -- The cluster formation rate (in number of clusters per Myr) as a function of age. Open circles: full sample; filled circles: clusters with well-determined ages, as above. The vertical dashed lines indicate the age range dominated by the burst of cluster formation. The dotted line is the least-squares power-law fit to the fading, non-disrupted clusters, for a constant ongoing cluster formation rate. The solid line segments are the disruption lines of clusters formed in the pre-burst phase, during the burst, and in the post-burst phase, as described in Section 6.1. (d) -- Mass spectrum of the M82 B clusters (number of clusters per mass bin); symbol coding as in panel (c). by supernova-driven outflows, which remove the remaining cool gas from the immediate starburst region (e.g., Cheva- lier & Clegg 1985, Doane & Mathews 1993). The remarkable minor-axis wind in M82 is a dramatic example of this pro- cess. However, the disturbed conditions near an early burst may discourage re-ignition at the same site when cool gas inflows resume, shifting the location of active star formation (e.g., dGOG). the cluster formation rate in the post-burst phase was ap- proximately a factor of 40 smaller than during the pre-burst phase. We conclude from this analysis that the cluster forma- tion rate during the burst was at least a factor of 2 higher than during the pre-burst phase (depending on the duration of the burst), and that the cluster formation rate was a factor of ∼ 40 smaller after the burst than before the burst. This is not surprising because the intense episode of cluster for- mation during the burst will have consumed a large fraction of the available number of molecular clouds, leaving little material for cluster formation at later times. In fact, it is likely that starbursts are strongly self-limited, or quenched, c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 10 R. de Grijs, N. Bastian, and H.J.G.L.M. Lamers 5 THE MASS DISTRIBUTION OF CLUSTERS FORMED IN THE BURST. In this section we analyse the mass distribution of the clus- ters that were formed during the burst of cluster forma- tion, roughly defined to have occurred in the age range 8.4 ≤ log(t/yr) ≤ 9.4 (see the vertical dashed lines in Fig. 4c). In Fig. 5 we show their mass distribution. Although the M82 B cluster system does not contain large numbers of very massive clusters, its mass distributions shows a clear increase in cluster numbers from the high-mass end towards lower masses, for log Mcl/M⊙ & 5. For lower masses, how- ever, the number of clusters decreases rapidly. If the mass spectrum of young, newly formed clusters resembles a power- law distribution, this turn-over at log Mcl/M⊙ ≃ 5 is not ex- pected, unless disruption effects have preferentially removed the lower-mass clusters from our magnitude-limited sample. In dGOG we concluded that the distribution of clus- ter luminosities (and therefore the equivalent mass distri- bution) in M82 B -- corrected to a common age of 50 Myr -- shows a broader and flatter mass distribution than typ- ical for young cluster systems, although this distribution is subject to strong selection effects. For the small age range considered here, the selection limit in observable mass at log(M/M⊙) ≃ 4.2 imposed by the brightness limit at V = 22.5 mag (Fig. 3) occurs at almost an order of mag- nitude lower masses than the turn-over mass in Fig. 5, at log(Mcl/M⊙) ≃ 5. The arrow in Fig. 5 indicates the mass where the onset of significant selection effects, and therefore of sample incompleteness, is expected to occur, based on the selection limit in the (age vs. mass) plane shown in Fig. 3. The expected effect of the AV . 0.2 mag extinction for the clusters with well-determined ages is a marginal shift in mass towards higher masses of ∆ log(Mcl/M⊙) . 0.08. This implies that the observed turnover is not a spurious effect due to varying extinction. In addition, we do not observe a systematic trend between cluster mass and extinction, de- rived from the SED fitting, which would be expected if the higher-mass clusters (and therefore brighter at the same age) were located slightly deeper into M82 B, while the fainter lower-mass clusters were only observed near the very surface of the region. Therefore, we conclude that if the initial mass spec- trum of the M82 B clusters formed in the burst of clus- ter formation resembled a power-law distribution down to the low-mass selection limits, cluster disruption must have transformed this distribution on a time-scale of . 109 yrs into a distribution resembling a log-normal or Gaussian dis- tribution. We now compare the observed mass distribution of the clusters formed in the burst with model predictions. These predictions are based on the assumption that the clusters were formed with a cluster IMF of slope α = 2, and that the distribution has been modified subsequently by cluster disruption. For the cluster disruption we adopt the same relation tdis = tdis 4 (M/104M⊙)γ with γ = 0.62 (Eq. (1)), as found in Paper I for four galaxies, and used in the previous section. We can then model the mass distribution of the observed burst clusters with only one free parameter, i.e. the disruption time tdis of a cluster with an initial mass of 104M⊙. 4 Figure 5. Mass distribution of the clusters formed in the burst of cluster formation, 8.4 ≤ log(t/yr) ≤ 9.4. The shaded histograms correspond to the clusters with (log(Age[max]) − log(Age[min]) ≤ 1.0; the open histograms represent the entire cluster sample in this age range. The arrow indicates the mass where the onset of signif- icant selection effects, and therefore of sample incompleteness, is expected to occur, based on the selection limit in Fig. 3. The ex- pected effect of the AV . 0.2 mag extinction for the clusters with well-determined ages is a shift in mass towards higher masses of ∆ log(Mcl/M⊙) . 0.08, which implies that the observed turnover is not a spurious effect due to varying extinction. The decreasing mass of a cluster with time is given by† dM dt ≃ − M tdis = − M tdis 4 (M/104M⊙)γ , so that M (Mi, t) = (M γ i − Bt)1/γ , (2) (3) where M and Mi are, respectively, the present and the initial mass of the cluster, both in units of M⊙, and B = γ104γ /tdis 4 . Suppose that clusters form in a burst as dN (Mi, t) = S(t)M −α i dMidt (4) over the mass range Mmin < Mi < Mmax, and governed by a α−1 yr−1. We assume an formation rate S(t) in units of M⊙ instantaneous burst of cluster formation, so that S(t) is a δ function at age tburst = 109 yr. We adopt Mmax = 3×106M⊙ (i.e., log Mmax/M⊙ = 6.5, one mass bin beyond the maxi- mum mass of clusters formed in the burst, thus allowing for some disruption effects) and Mmin = 102M⊙, but this lower limit is not important since it is below the detection limit of ∼ 104 M⊙ for the burst clusters (see Fig. 2). The function † Recent simulations, based on both Monte Carlo realisations (e.g., Giersz 2001, his Fig. 2) and N-body modeling (e.g., Porte- gies Zwart et al. 2002, their Fig. 2; S.J. Aarseth, priv. comm.), show that this is a close approximation to real cluster evolution, provided that the initial cluster has reached an equilibrium state. c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales -- II. 11 Figure 6. Predicted mass distributions in terms of log(dN/dM )× (M/Ntot (equivalent to the logarithm of the number of clusters per mass bin) for an instantaneous burst of cluster formation that occurred 1 Gyr ago. From top to bottom, the curves represent the (normalised) mass distributions for characteristic cluster disrup- tion times log(tdis 4 /yr) = 10.0, 9.5, 9.0, 8.5, 8.0, and 7.5. Notice the dependence of both the turnover mass, indicated by the dotted line, and the maximum mass on tdis 4 . S(t) is related to the total number of clusters formed per unit time as S(t) = dNtot dt (α − 1)(cid:18)M 1−α min − M 1−α max(cid:19)−1 (5) where dNtot/dt is the total number of clusters formed per year. It is easy to show that the present mass distribution of clusters formed in an instantaneous burst of age tburst can be written as N (M )dM = S(t) 1 + γ(cid:18) M 104M⊙(cid:19)γ tburst 4 !(1−α−γ)/γ tdis M⊙(cid:19)−α (cid:18) M dM (6) for masses above the detection limit and smaller than (M γ max − Btburst)1/γ. We see that the initial mass distri- bution, dN (Mi, t) = S(t)M −α , has been modified by a fac- tor that depends on the ratio tburst/tdis 4 , for given values of α = 2.0 and γ = 0.62. i We have calculated the predicted mass distribution, us- ing Eq. (6), for a burst age of 1 Gyr and for several val- ues of the cluster disruption time-scale tdis 4 , see Fig. 6. To match the observed peak in the cluster mass distribution, a characteristic disruption time-scale log(tdis 4 /yr) between 7.5 and 8.0 is required, with the most likely value closer to log(tdis 4 yr) = 8.0. We then calculated the expected number of clusters in the same age bins as observed (Fig. 5) and normalised the distribution to the observed total number of clusters. The results are shown in Fig. 7a for the subsample of the 42 clus- ters with the most accurately determined ages, and in panel b for the full sample of 58 clusters. The location of the pre- dicted peak is very sensitive to the value of tdis 4 /tburst, which follows from Eq. (6), and is shown in Fig. 6. We found the 4 ≃ 3 × 10−2tburst, best fit for a cluster disruption time of tdis c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Figure 7. Comparison between the observed mass distribution of the clusters formed in the burst of cluster formation and the pre- dicted distribution, based on a cluster IMF with slope α = 2 and cluster disruption with time-scales of tdis = tdis 4 (M/104M⊙)0.62. (a) Cluster sample with the most accurate masses and ages. (b) Full sample. The predicted number of clusters in each mass bin, normalised to the total number of observed clusters, are shown by the dotted, full and dashed lines for characteristic disruption time-scales log(tdis 4 /yr) = 8.5, 8.0, and 7.5, respectively. with an uncertainty of approximately a factor of two. This corresponds to tburst = 3 × 107 yr if tburst = 1 Gyr. We con- clude that the mass distribution of the clusters formed dur- ing the burst can be explained by an initial cluster IMF with a slope of α = 2, an upper limit to their mass of ∼ 3 × 106 M⊙ and cluster disruption with a time-scale given by Eq. (1), tdis 4 ≃ 3 × 107 yr if the age of the burst is tburst = 1 × 109 yr. The uncertainties in both the observed and predicted numbers of clusters of a given mass are governed by identi- cal Poisson-type statistical errors. The uncertainties in the mass and age scales, on the other hand, are dominated by systematic uncertainties introduced by the adopted stellar evolutionary synthesis models, and -- to some extent -- by the specific extinction law adopted, although the relative mass and age distributions are robust. 12 R. de Grijs, N. Bastian, and H.J.G.L.M. Lamers 6 DISCUSSION 6.1 The cluster disruption time-scale We have derived the characteristic cluster disruption time- scale from the mass distribution of the clusters formed dur- ing the burst. In principle this disruption time-scale could also be derived from the the age distributions of the clusters formed during the post-burst phase, shown in Fig. 4c. How- ever the number of observed young clusters is very small, only a few per age bin so that the crossing point between the (dotted) fading line and the (solid) disruption line is very uncertain. However, the crossing point suggested in Fig. 4c agrees approximately with that expected for the disruption time-scale of tdis 4 ≃ 3 × 107 yr derived from the clusters formed during the burst (see the description of the method in Paper I). In Paper I we have shown that the disruption time-scale can also be derived from the mass distribution of clusters in a magnitude limited sample if the cluster formation rate is constant. This last assumption is certainly not justified for M82 B. For a strongly variable cluster formation rate, as in M82 B, the mass distribution is heavily affected such that the crossing point between the power-law fit to the distribution of low mass clusters (the fading line) and the power-law fit to the distribution of the massive clusters (the disruption line) does no longer represent the value of tdis 4 . Therefore, we could only use the mass distribution of the clusters formed during the burst to derived the disruption time-scale. An initial comparison among the characteristic cluster disruption time-scales found in Paper I reveals large differ- ences. However, the characteristic cluster disruption time- scale for the clusters in region B of its low-mass host galaxy M82 is, within the uncertainties, comparable to that in the dense centre of the massive grand-design spiral M51. Lamers & Portegies Zwart (in prep.) are currently analysing the cluster disruption time-scales derived for the galaxies stud- ied in Paper I and in this paper, using N-body simulations. Here, we will therefore simply explore whether this similar- ity between tdis in the centre of M51 and in M82 B can be understood from a comparison of the ambient density in both regions. 4 In order to estimate the density in M82 B, we deter- mined its total V-band luminosity, after correcting for a nominal extinction throughout the region of AV ∼ 0.5 mag, Vtot ∼ 9.5 from our HST observations (dGOG), so that MV,tot = −18.3, LV,tot ≃ 1.8 × 109LV,⊙. Spectral synthe- sis of region B suggests that it has a V-band mass-to-light ratio, M/LV ∼ 0.5 − 1.0 (R.W. O'Connell, priv. comm.), as expected from the Starburst99 models for a stellar popu- lation of several 100 Myr, so that the total mass contained in the objects providing most of the V-band luminosity is M ∼ 1.35 × 109M⊙. If we now assume that the volume oc- cupied by these objects is roughly similar to a sphere with a radius determined by the radius of the area in which we measured the total flux, we derive an average density for M82 B of hρi ∼ 2.5M⊙pc−3, or loghρi(M⊙pc−3) ∼ 0.4. Note, however, that we have introduced large uncertainties by adopting the above assumptions, in particular because we have assumed to have sampled the entire volume of the "spherical region" M82 B. This implies that the region has been assumed transparent, as opposed to the conclusion in dGOG that the M82 B cluster sample contains likely only the subset of M82 B clusters on the surface of the "sphere". The implications of our assumptions are therefore that we expect to have missed a large number of clusters present in the interior of M82 B. For these missed clusters in the inte- rior we expect the disruption time to be shorter because of the higher densities predicted there. For the interstellar medium in the centre of M51, Lamers & Portegies Zwart (in prep.) derive a mean density of hρi ∼ 0.60M⊙pc−3, based on column density estimates by Athanassoula et al. (1987) and similar geometrical argu- ments as used above for M82 B. Within the large uncertain- ties involved in such back-of-the-envelope approximations, these two estimates of the mean density in the centre of M51 and in M82 B are remarkably similar, within an order of magnitude, as are their characteristic cluster disruption time-scales. Thus, we conclude that, although M82 as such is a small, low-mass irregular galaxy, its fossil starburst region B has achieved a similarly dense interstellar medium as the centre of M51, so that similar cluster disruption time-scales are not a priori ruled out. 6.2 The cluster formation rate We have derived the cluster formation history of M82 B from the age distribution shown in Fig. 4c. The age distribution itself, Fig. 4a already shows a very strong peak around 109 years. Part of the steep increase between 8 < log(t/yr) < 9 is owing to the use of logarithmic age bins. Therefore we have transformed the age distribution into the formation history of the observed clusters, Fig 4c. The general decrease with age clearly shows the effect of cluster disruption. Disruption of clusters formed at a constant formation rate and with a mass-dependent disruption time-scale will result in a power- law decrease of the observed cluster formation rate (Paper I), roughly in agreement with the observations. The deviations from the power law, e.g., the peak in the observed formation history around 1 Gyr, reflect changes in the real formation history, or in the disruption time. For magnitude-limited cluster samples with a constant cluster formation rate and a constant mass-dependent dis- ruption time-scale, the disruption time and its dependence on mass can be derived from the age distribution. Because of the non-constant cluster formation rate and the small number of clusters, such an analysis is not possible here. Therefore we opted for the reasonable alternative of adopt- ing the mass dependence of the disruption time-scale, i.e., the value of γ ≃ 0.62 in Eq. (1), which seems to be a uni- versal value found in four galaxies with very different con- ditions (Paper I). We also assumed that the scaling factor tdis 4 of the disruption time-scale is constant. With these two assumptions, we derived the ratios between the real clus- ter formation rates in the pre-burst phase (log(t/yr) ≥ 9.4), the burst-phase (8.4 < log(t/yr) < 9.4) and the post-burst phase (log(t/yr) ≤ 8.4 of, roughly, 1 : 2 : 1 40 . The formation rate during the burst may have been higher if the actual duration of the burst was shorter than adopted. Alternatively, we could have adopted a constant cluster formation rate, but wildly variable cluster disruption time- scales. In that case the cluster disruption time-scale should have been much longer (i.e. much slower disruption) dur- ing the burst than before the burst, and again much shorter c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 Star Cluster Formation and Disruption Time-Scales -- II. 13 (faster disruption) after the burst. We think that this alter- native is very unlikely because (a) disruption is a slow pro- cess that occurs over an extended period of time, so large changes are not to be expected, (b) there is no obvious phys- ical process that would produce such large changes and (c) the alternative of a variable cluster formation rate is much more likely, because this effect is observed in several inter- acting galaxies and in M82 regions A, C and E (dGOG). Therefore, we are confident that the changes in the apparent formation rates of the observed clusters are due to changes in the real cluster formation rate. 7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we have reanalysed the previously published optical and near-infrared HST photometry of the star clus- ters in M82's fossil starburst region B (dGOG) to obtain improved individual age and mass estimates. We have also extended this study to obtain estimates for the cluster for- mation history and include the importance of cluster disrup- tion. Our main results and conclusions can be summarised as follows: (i) Our new age estimates, based on improved fitting methods, confirm the peak in the age histogram attributed to the last tidal encounter with M81 by dGOG. For the sub- sample of clusters with well-determined ages we find a peak formation epoch at log(tpeak/yr) = 9.04 (tpeak ≃ 1.10 Gyr), with a Gaussian σ of ∆ log(twidth) = 0.27, corresponding to a FWHM of ∆ log(twidth) = 0.64. The corresponding num- bers for the full sample are log(tpeak/yr) = 8.97 (tpeak ≃ 0.93 Gyr) for the peak of cluster formation, and for σ, ∆ log(twidth) = 0.35 (FWHM, ∆ log(twidth) = 0.82). In dGOG (see also de Grijs 2001), we concluded that there is a strong peak of cluster formation at ∼ 650 Myr ago, which have formed over a period of ∼ 500 Myr, but very few clus- ters are younger than 300 Myr (log(t/yr) ≃ 8.5). Our new age estimates date the event triggering the starburst to be slightly older. Our estimate of the duration of the peak is an upper limit because the observed width of the peak in the age histogram may have been broadened by uncertainties in the derived cluster ages. (ii) The improved mass estimates confirm that the (ini- tial) masses of the young clusters in M82 B with V ≤ 22.5 mag are mostly in the range 104 − 106M⊙, with a me- dian of 105M⊙ (dGOG). We find that the mean mass of our M82 B cluster sample is log(Mcl/M⊙) = 5.03 and 4.88 for the subsample with well-determined ages and the full sample, respectively, corresponding to Mcl = 1.1 × 105 and 0.8×105M⊙, respectively. If the initial mass spectrum of the clusters formed at the burst epoch was a power law, disrup- tion effects have transformed it into a broader and flatter distribution on time-scales of . 1 Gyr. (iii) The (apparent) formation history of the observed clusters shows a gradual increase to younger ages, reach- ing a maximum at the present time. This shows that cluster disruption must have removed a large fraction of the older clusters. Adopting the expression for the cluster disruption time, tdis(M ) = tdis 4 (M/104M⊙)γ with γ ≃ 0.62, that was derived for four galaxies characterized by very different con- ditions (Paper I), we found that ratios between the real clus- ter formation rates in the pre-burst phase (log(t/yr) ≥ 9.4), c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000 the burst-phase (8.4 < log(t/yr) < 9.4) and the post-burst phase (log(t/yr) ≤ 8.4) are roughly 1 : 2 : 1 40 . The formation rate during the burst may have been higher if the actual du- ration of the burst was shorter than adopted. We see that the cluster formation rate in the post-burst phase is much smaller than in the pre-burst phase, because the burst has consumed a large fraction of the available molecular clouds, leaving little material for the cluster formation in the post- burst phase. (iv) The mass distribution of the clusters formed during the burst shows a turnover at log(Mcl/M⊙) ≃ 5.2. This turnover is not due to selection effects, because the mag- nitude limit of our sample would produce a turnover near log(Mcl/M⊙) ≃ 4.5. The observed distribution can be ex- plained by cluster formation with an initial power-law mass function of exponent α = 2 up to a maximum cluster mass of Mmax = 3 × 106M⊙, and cluster disruption given by Eq. (1) with the adopted value of γ = 0.62 with only one free fitting 4 /tburst ≃ 3 × 10−2. For a burst age of 1 × 109 parameter: tdis yr, we find that tdis 4 ≃ 3 × 107 years, with an uncertainty of a factor of two. (v) The time-scale of tdis 4 ∼ 30 Myr is much shorter than derived in Paper I for any of the SMC (∼ 8 Gyr), the so- lar neighbourhood (∼ 1 Gyr), M33 (∼ 0.13 Gyr) and even shorter than in the inner spiral arms of M51 (∼ 40 Myr). The characteristic disruption time-scale in M82 B is the shortest known in any disc (region of a) galaxy. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RdeG wishes to thank the Astronomical Institute of Utrecht University for their hospitality and partial support on a visit when this work was started. We acknowledge interesting and useful discussions with Bob O'Connell and Sverre Aarseth and helpful suggestions by the anonymous referee. This re- search has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Abstract Service. REFERENCES Athanassoula E., Bosma A., Papaioannou 1987, A&A, 179, 23 Barger A.J., Arag´on-Salamanca A., Ellis R.S., Couch W.J., Smail I., Sharples R.M., 1996, MNRAS, 279, 1 Bik A., Lamers H.J.G.L.M., Bastian N., Panagia N., Romaniello M., Kirshner R., 2002, A&A, in press (astro-ph/0210594) Boutloukos S.G., Lamers H.J.G.L.M., 2001, in: Extragalactic Star Clusters, eds. Grebel E.K., Geisler D., IAU Symp. 207, (San Francisco: ASP), in press Boutloukos S.G., Lamers H.J.G.L.M., 2002, MNRAS, in press (astro-ph/0210595; Paper I) Brandl B., Chernoff D.F., Moffat A.F.J., 2001, in: Extragalactic Star Clusters, eds. Grebel E.K., Geisler D., IAU Symp. 207, (San Francisco: ASP), in press Bruzual G., Charlot S., 2000, updated version of Bruzual G., Charlot S., 1996, in: Leitherer, C., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 996 (AAS CDROM Series 7) (BC00) Butcher H., Oemler A., 1978, ApJ, 219, 18 Chernoff D.F., Weinberg M.D., 1990, ApJ, 351, 121 Chevalier R.A., Clegg A.W., 1985, Nat., 317, 44 Couch W.J., Barger A.J., Smail I., Ellis R.S., Sharples R.M., 1998, ApJ, 497, 188 Couch W.J., Sharples R.M., 1987, MNRAS, 229, 423 14 R. de Grijs, N. Bastian, and H.J.G.L.M. Lamers de Grijs R., 2001, A&G, 42, 14 de Grijs R., Johnson R.A., Gilmore G.F., Frayn C.M., 2002a, MNRAS, 331, 228 de Grijs R., Gilmore G.F., Johnson R.A., Mackey A.D., 2002b, MNRAS, 331, 245 de Grijs R., O'Connell R.W., Gallagher J.S., 2001, AJ, 121, 768 (dGOG) de la Fuente Marcos R., 1997, A&A, 322, 764 Doane J.S., Mathews W.G., 1993, ApJ, 419, 573 Dressler A., Gunn J.E., 1990, in: Evolution of the Universe of Galaxies, ed. Kron R.G., (San Francisco: ASP), p. 200 Elmegreen B.G., Efremov Y.N., 1997, ApJ, 480, 235 Elson R.A.W., 1991, ApJS, 76, 185 Elson R.A.W., 1992, MNRAS, 256, 515 Elson R.A.W., Freeman K.C., Lauer T.R., 1989, ApJ, 347, 69 Fritze-v. Alvensleben U., Gerhard O.E., 1994, A&A, 285, 775 Gallagher J.S., Smith L.J., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 540 Giavalisco M., 1997, in: The Hubble Deep Field, eds. Livio M., Fall S.M., Madau P., (Cambridge: CUP), p. 121 Giersz M., 2001, MNRAS, 324, 218 Girardi L., Chiosi C., Bertelli G., Bressan A., 1995, A&A, 298, 87 Harris W.E., Pudritz R.E., 1994, ApJ, 429, 177 Ho L.C., Filippenko A.V., 1996a, ApJ, 466, L83 Ho L.C., Filippenko A.V., 1996b, ApJ, 472, 600 Kroupa P., Tout C.A., Gilmore G.F., 1993, MNRAS, 262, 545 Leitherer C., Schaerer D., Goldader J.D., Gonzalez Delgado R.M., Robert C., Kune D.F., de Mello D.F., Devost D., Heckman T.M., 1999, ApJS, 123, 3 (Starburst99) Lowenthal J.D., et al., 1997, ApJ, 481, 673 Lynds C.R., Sandage A.R., 1963, ApJ, 137, 1005 Marcum P., O'Connell R.W., 1996, in: From Stars to Galaxies: The Impact of Stellar Physics on Galaxy Evolution, eds. Lei- therer C., Fritze-von Alvensleben U., Huchra J., (San Fran- cisco: ASP), p. 419 McCarthy P.J., Heckman T., van Breugel W., 1987, AJ, 92, 264 McLaughlin D.E., Pudritz R.E., 1996, ApJ, 457, 578 Mengel S., Lehnert M.D., Thatte N., Genzel R., 2002, A&A, 383, 137 O'Connell R.W., Gallagher J.S., Hunter D.A., Colley W.N., 1995, ApJ, 446, L1 O'Connell R.W., Mangano J.J., 1978, ApJ, 221, 62 Oemler A., 1992, in: Clusters & Superclusters of Galaxies, ed. Fabian A.C. (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 29 Oort J.H., 1957, "Stellar Populations", Rome: Pontifical Academy of Science, discussion in session on star clusters Parmentier G., de Grijs R., Gilmore G.F., 2002, MNRAS, sub- mitted Portegies Zwart S.F., Makino J., McMillan S.L.W., Hut P., 2001, ApJ, 546, L101 Portegies Zwart S.F., Makino J., McMillan S.L.W., Hut P., 2002, ApJ, 565, 265 Rieke G.H., Loken K., Rieke M.J., Tamblyn P., 1993, ApJ, 412, 99 Scuderi S., Panagia N., Gilmozzi R., Challis P.M., Kirshner R.P., 1996, ApJ, 465, 956 Shen J., Lo K.Y., 1995, ApJ, 445, L99 Shopbell P.L., Bland-Hawthorn J., 1998, ApJ, 493, 129 Smith L.J., Gallagher J.S., 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1027 Spitzer L. Jr., 1957, ApJ, 127, 17 Steidel C.C., Giavalisco M., Pettini M., Dickinson M., Adelberger K.L., 1996, ApJ, 462, L17 Telesco C.M., 1988, ARA&A, 26, 343 Vesperini E., 2000, MNRAS, 318, 841 Vesperini E., 2001, MNRAS, 322, 247 Wills K.A., Das M., Pedlar A., Muxlow T.B.W., Robinson T.G., 2000, MNRAS, 316, 33 Zhang Q., Fall S.M., 1999, ApJ, 527, L81 c(cid:13) 2001 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
astro-ph/9708026	1	9708	1997-08-04T13:23:47	Violent Relaxation, Phase Mixing, and Gravitational Landau Damping	[ "astro-ph" ]	This paper proposes a geometric interpretation of flows generated by the collisionless Boltzmann equation (CBE), focusing on the coarse-grained approach towards equilibrium. The CBE is a noncanonical Hamiltonian system with the distribution function f the fundamental dynamical variable, the mean field energy H[f] playing the role of the Hamiltonian and the natural arena of physics being the infinite-dimensional phase space of distribution functions. Every time-independent equilibrium f_0 is an energy extremal with respect to all perturbations that preserve the constraints associated with Liouville's Theorem, local energy minima corresponding to linearly stable equilibria. If an initial f(t=0) is sufficiently close to some linearly stable lower energy f_0, its evolution involves linear phase space oscillations about f_0 which, in many cases, would be expected to exhibit linear Landau damping. If f(t=0) is far from any stable extremal, the flow will be more complicated but, in general, one would anticipate that the evolution involves nonlinear oscillations about some lower energy f_0. In this picture, the coarse-grained approach towards equilibrium usually termed violent relaxation is interpreted as nonlinear Landau damping. The evolution of a generic initial f(t=0) involves a coherent initial excitation, not necessarily small, being converted into incoherent motion associated with nonlinear oscillations about some equilibrium f_0 which, in general, will exhibit destructive interference.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Violent Relaxation, Phase Mixing, and Gravitational Landau Damping Henry E. Kandrup Department of Astronomy and Department of Physics and Institute for Fundamental Theory, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 USA Abstract This paper outlines a geometric interpretation of flows generated by the colli- sionless Boltzmann equation, focusing in particular on the coarse-grained ap- proach towards a time-independent equilibrium. The starting point is the recog- nition that the collisionless Boltzmann equation is a noncanonical Hamiltonian system with the distribution function f as the fundamental dynamical variable, the mean field energy H[f ] playing the role of the Hamiltonian and the natural arena of physics being Γ, the infinite-dimensional phase space of distribution functions. Every time-independent equilibrium f0 is an energy extremal with respect to all perturbations δf that preserve the constraints (Casimirs) associ- ated with Liouville's Theorem. If the extremal is a local energy minimum, f0 must be linearly stable but, if it corresponds instead to a saddle point, f0 may be unstable. If an initial f (t = 0) is sufficiently close to some linearly stable lower energy f0, its evolution can be visualised as involving linear phase space oscillations about f0 which, in many cases, would be expected to exhibit linear Landau damping. If instead f (0) is far from any stable extremal, the flow will be more complicated but, in general, one might anticipate that the evolution can be visualised as involving nonlinear oscillations about some lower energy f0. In this picture, the coarse-grained approach towards equilibrium usually termed violent relaxation is interpreted as nonlinear Landau damping. Evolution of a generic initial f (0) involves a coherent initial excitation δf (0) ≡ f (0) − f0, not necessarily small, being converted into incoherent motion associated with nonlinear oscillations about some f0 which, in general, will exhibit destructive interference. This picture allows for distinctions between regular and chaotic "orbits" in Γ: Stable extremals f0 all have vanishing Lyapunov exponents, even though "orbits" oscillating about f0 may well correspond to chaotic trajectories with one or more positive Lyapunov exponents. 1 1. Introduction and Motivation The problem addressed in this paper is how to visualise flows generated by the collision- less Boltzmann equation (CBE), i.e., the gravitational analogue of the electrostatic Vlasov equation from plasma physics. It is generally accepted that many physical problems arising in galactic dynamics and cosmology can be modeled in terms of the CBE, perhaps allowing also for low amplitude discreteness effects, modeled as friction and noise through the formulation of a Fokker- Planck equation, or for a coupling to a dissipative fluid described, e.g., by the Navier- Stokes equation. Astronomers recognise that an evolution described completely by the CBE is special because of the constraints associated with Liouville's Theorem, and that, at some level, the flow must be Hamiltonian, which precludes the possibility of any pointwise approach towards a time-independent equilibrium: in the absence of dissipation, one can only speak meaningfully of a coarse-grained approach towards equilibrium. However, there does not seem to be a clear sense of exactly how one ought to visualise a flow governed by the CBE or of what sort of coarse-graining one ought to implement in order to identify an approach towards equilibrium. The conventional wisdom of galactic dynamics (cf. Binney and Tremaine 1987), as ar- ticulated, e.g., by Maoz (1991), draws sharp distinctions between different aspects of the evolution, speaking separately of phase mixing, (linear) Landau damping, and violent re- laxation. However, such distinctions, even if useful in addressing specific physical effects, are arguably ad hoc and, as such, may obscure the overall character of the flow. Plasma physicists (cf. van Kampen 1955, Case 1959) are well acquainted with the fact that, appro- priately interpreted, linear Landau damping is a phase mixing associated with the evolution of a wave packet constructed from a continuous set of normal modes. Moreover, even though conventional wisdom makes a sharp distinction between violent relaxation and phase mix- ing/Landau damping, one can argue that, as is implicit in Lynden-Bell's (1967) original paper on violent relaxation, it too is a phase mixing process. The objective here is to present a coherent mathematical description of an evolution described by the CBE that manifests explicitly the Hamiltonian character of the flow. This entails a synthesis and extension of existing work in both plasma physics and galactic dynamics (cf. Morrison 1980, Morrison and Eliezur 1986, Kandrup 1989, 1998 and numerous references cited therein) which, in the context of galactic dynamics, has proven useful in understanding problems related to both linear and global stability, as well as stability in the presence of weak dissipation (cf. Kandrup 1991a,b, Perez and Aly 1996, Perez, Alimi, Aly, and Scholl 1996). Section 2 describes the precise sense in which the CBE is an infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian system, identifying the natural phase space, exhibiting the noncanonical Hamiltonian structure, and then speculating on the possible meaning of regular versus chaotic flows. Section 3 turns to the problem of linear stability for time-independent equilibria. This is 2 addressed both in the context of the full noncanonical Hamiltonian dynamics and in terms of a simpler canonical Hamiltonian structure associated with the tangent dynamics, i.e., identifying explicitly a set of canonically conjugate variables in terms of which to analyse linear perturbations. One immediate by-product of this discussion is a simple explanation (cf. Habib, Kandrup, and Yip 1986) of linear Landau damping which manifests explicitly that it is in fact a phase mixing process: Even though a perturbation cannot "die away" in any pointwise sense, one may expect a coarse-grained approach towards equilibrium in which observables like the density perturbation δρ eventually decay to zero. Section 4 generalises the preceding to the case of nonlinear stability, allowing for per- turbations δf away from some equilibrium f0 which are not necessarily small. The intuition derived from that problem is then used to motivate one possible way in which to visualise the flow associated with a generic initial f (t = 0). The obvious point is that a generic initial f (0) can be viewed as a (possibly strongly nonlinear) perturbation of some equilibrium f0, the form of which, however, need not be known explicitly. To the extent that this inter- pretation is accepted, those aspects of the flow typically denoted violent relaxation should be viewed as nonlinear Landau damping/phase mixing (cf. Kandrup 1998). Section 5 con- cludes by describing the mathematical issues which must be resolved to make the preceding discussion rigorous and complete. A simple mechanical model, which can help in visualising the basic ideas described in this paper, is the following: Consider a point particle moving in some complicated, many-dimensional potential V (r) which is characterised generically by multiple extremal points but which, being bounded from below, will have a (in general nondegenerate) global minimum. If one chooses initial data corresponding to a configuration space point r close to but slightly above some local minimum r0 and a velocity v whose magnitude is very small, the subsequent evolution will involve linear oscillations about r0, whether or not that point corresponds to a global minimum. The trajectory of the point particle thus corresponds to a regular orbit in what appears locally as a harmonic potential. If the initial deviation from the extremal point becomes somewhat larger, because r − r0 and/or v is bigger, one would still anticipate oscillations around r0, but these will now become nonlinear and the particle trajectory may well correspond to a chaotic orbit. Suppose, however, that r0 is not the global minimum. In this case, one would expect that, for initial data sufficiently far from r0, the particle will have left the "basin of attraction" associated with the local minimum and will instead (generically) exhibit strongly nonlinear oscillations about the global minimum (it could of course oscillate around a different nonglobal minimum!). In the absence of dissipation, there is no pointwise sense in which the particle evolves towards the global minimum. However, the nonlinear oscillations in different directions will in general interfere destructively, so that any initial coherence between motions in different directions will eventually be lost (at least for times short compared with the Poincar´e recurrence time). It is this loss of coherence which, for the CBE, gives rise to (linear or nonlinear) Landau damping. 3 2. The Noncanonical Hamiltonian Formulation If one considers the Liouville equation appropriate for a collection of noninteracting particles evolving in a fixed potential Φ(x), the natural phase space is the six-dimensional phase space associated with the canonical pair (x, v). If, however, one considers the full CBE, allowing for a self-consistent potential Φ[f (x, v)] determined by the free-streaming particles, this is no longer so. In this case, the fundamental dynamical variable is the distribution function itself, and the natural phase space Γ is the infinite-dimensional phase space of distribution functions. In general, it is not easy to identify conjugate coordinates and momenta in this phase space so as to rewrite the CBE in the form of Hamilton's equations. However, one can still capture the Hamiltonian character at a formal algebraic level through the identification of an appropriate cosymplectic structure (cf. Arnold 1989).1 In this context, manifesting the Hamiltonian character of the flow entails identifying a Lie bracket [ . , . ], defined on pairs of phase space functionals A[f ] and B[f ], and a Hamil- tonian functional H[f ], so chosen that the CBE with Φ(x, t) the self-consistent potential satisfying ∂f ∂t + v· ∂f ∂x − ∇Φ· ∂f ∂v = 0, can be written in the form ∇2Φ = 4πGρ ≡ Z d3v f, ∂f ∂t + [H, f ] = 0. (1) (2) (3) 1 One example of a noncanonical Hamiltonian system, well known to astronomers, is rigid body rotations described by the standard Euler equations (cf. Landau and Lifshitz 1960). Specifically, as described and generalised, e.g., in Kandrup (1990) and Kandrup and Morrison (1993), the Euler equations constitute a Hamiltonian system, formulated in the three-dimensional phase space coor- dinatised by the three components of angular momentum Ji, (i = 1, 2, 3), with the Hamiltonian i /2Ii (the analogue of eq. 4) defined in terms of the principal moments of inertia Ii, and the Lie bracket (the analogue of eq. 5) given as the natural bracket associated with the three-dimensional rotation group, i.e., H[Ji] = P3 i=1 J 2 [a, b] = Xi,j,k ǫijkJk(cid:0) ∂a ∂Ji(cid:1)(cid:0) ∂b ∂Jj(cid:1) for functions a(Ji) and b(Ji). As for the CBE, there is also a Casimir (the analogue of eq. 9), i , which restricts motion to the two-dimensional constant C surface in the i=1 J 2 namely C[Ji] = P3 three-dimensional phase space. Astronomers are also acquainted with infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems, at least those t Ψ − ∇2Ψ = realisable in canonical coordinates, one simple example being the scalar wave equation ∂ 2 0, which derives from the Hamiltonian H = 1 2 Z d3x(cid:16)Π2(x) + ∇Ψ(x2(cid:17), where Ψ and Π are canonically conjugate. 4 The Hamiltonian H may be taken as H[f ] = 1 2 Z dΓ v2 f (x, v) − G 2 Z dΓ Z dΓ′ f (x, v)f (x′, v′) x − x′ , (4) with dΓ ≡ d3xd3v, which corresponds to the obvious mean field energy, as identified, e.g., by Lynden-Bell and Sanitt (1969). The bracket is then chosen to satisfy (Morrison 1980) [A, B] = Z dΓ f n δA δf , δB δfo, (5) where {g, h} denotes the ordinary Poisson bracket acting on functions g(x, v) and h(x, v), and δ/δf denotes a functional derivative. It is straightforward to show that the operation defined by eq. (5) is a skew symmetric, bilinear form, satisfying the Jacobi identity [g, [h, k]] + [h, [k, g]] + [k, [g, h]] = 0, (6) so that it defines a bona fide Lie bracket. However for this bracket one verifies immediately that eq. (3) reduces to the CBE in the form ∂f ∂t − {E, f } = 0, where E represents the energy of a unit mass test particle, i.e., E = 1 2 v2 + Φ(x, t). (7) (8) A flow governed by the CBE is strongly constrained by Liouville's Theorem, which implies the existence of an infinite number of conserved quantities, the so-called Casimirs C[f ]. Specificially, the flow has the property that, for any function χ(f ), the value of the phase space integral C[f ] =Z dΓ χ(f ) (9) is invariant under time translation, i.e., dC/dt = 0. The simplest case corresponds to the choice χ = f , which leads to conservation of number (or mass): d dt Z dΓ f ≡ 0. (10) By analogy with finite-dimensional systems, where Noether's Theorem relates conserved quantities to continuous symmetries, these Casimirs reflect internal symmetries in the infinite-dimensional phase space Γ (Morrison and Eliezur 1986). The Casimirs play an important role in analysing the stability of equilibrium solutions f0, where one must restrict attention to perturbations δf that satisfy δC ≡ 0 for all possible choices of χ. As first noted by Bartholomew (1971), this demand implies that any allowed perturbation δf is related to f0 by a canonical transformation induced by some generating function g, i.e., f ≡ f0 + δf = exp({g, . })f0. (11) 5 In addition to the Casimirs, there is also at least one other conserved quantity, namely the mean field energy H[f ]. Specifically, it follows from the CBE that dH/dt ≡ 0. If one considers initial data f (0) characterised by a high degree of symmetry, other conserved quantities may also exist. For example, if the initial data correspond to a potential Φ which is spherically symmetric, it follows that the numerical value of the angular momentum J ≡ Z d3xd3v f x×v (12) is necessarily conserved. However, these conserved quantities, if they exist, are on a different footing from the Casimirs since they reflect symmetries in the particle phase space, rather than internal symmetries associated with the infinite-dimensional phase space of distribution functions. Because of the infinite number of constraints associated with the Casimirs, the evolution of f is reduced to a lower (but presumably still infinite-) dimensional phase space hypersur- face, say γ. One might naively believe that, in the same sense as, e.g., for the Kortweg-de Vries equation (cf. Arnold 1989), the flow associated with the CBE is integrable. In point of fact, however, this is almost certainly not so (cf. Morrison 1987), the important point being that the Casimirs associated with the CBE are all "ultralocal" quantities which do not involve derivatives of f . At the present time, there is no universally accepted notion of what precisely one should mean by chaos in an infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian system. However, one obvious tact entails comparing initially nearby flows and asking whether, for some given f (t = 0), there exist perturbations δf (t = 0) which grow exponentially. This leads naturally2 to the notion of a functional Lyapunov exponent which, at least formally, can be defined by analogy with the definition of an ordinary Lyapunov exponent in a finite-dimensional system (cf. Lichtenberg and Lieberman 1992). Specifically, given the introduction of an appropriate norm , one can write χ = lim t→∞ lim δf (0)→0 1 t δf (t) δf (0) . (13) For finite dimensional systems one knows that, independent of the choice of norm, the analogue of eq. (13) will, for a generic phase space perturbation δz, converge towards the largest Lyapunov exponent. Much less is known about the infinite-dimensional case. For specificity, it thus seems reasonable to choose as corresponding to a (possibly weighted) L2 norm defined in the phase space of distribution functions, i.e., δf ≡ Z dΓ M (x, v) δf (x, v)2, (14) where M denotes a specified function of x and v. This is, e.g., the type of norm that has been used in proving theorems about linear stability. 2 I thank Bruce Miller and Klaus Dietz for suggesting this point to me. 6 3. Linear Stability and Gravitational Landau Damping The key fact underlying the interpretation of flows described by the CBE and, especially, the problem of stability, is that every time-independent equilibrium f0 is an energy extremal with respect to "symplectic" perturbations δf of the form (11) which preserve the numerical values of every Casimir. This implies that, if one restricts attention to the reduced phase space γ obtained by freezing the value of each Casimir at its equilibrium value C[f0], every equilibrium f0 corresponds to an isolated fixed point: To lowest order, the quantity δH ≡ 0 for any symplectic δf . As explained below, if f0 is a local energy minimum, so that, to next leading order, δH ≥ 0, f0 must be linearly stable. Alternatively, if f0 corresponds to a saddle point, so that H increases for some perturbations but decreases for others, linear stability is no longer guaranteed, although one cannot necessarily infer that f0 must be linearly unstable. The proof that, to lowest order, δH vanishes for any perturbation of the form (11) and the computation of δH to higher order are straightforward if one expands (11) perturbatively to infer that δf = {g, f0} + {g, {g, f0}} + . . . ≡ δ(1)f + δ(2)f + . . . . 1 2 (15) (16) It is easy to see that, for any δ(1)f , the first variation δ(1)H becomes δ(1)H = Z dΓ (cid:16) 1 2 v2 − GZ dΓ′ f ′ 0 x − x′(cid:17)δ(1)f = Z dΓE0δ(1)f, where E0 is the particle energy associated with f0. However, by combining eqs. (15) and (16) and then integrating by parts, one finds that δ(1)H = Z E0 {g, f0} = −Z dΓ g{E0, f0} ≡ 0, (17) where (cf. eq. 7) the final equality follows from fact that f0 is time-independent. Extending this calculation to one higher order shows that the second variation δ(2)H = − 1 2 Z dΓ {g, f0} {g, E0} − G 2 Z dΓZ dΓ′ {g, f0} {g′, f ′ x − x′ 0} . (18) To help visualise what is going on, and to understand why linear stability follows if δ(2)H is positive for all symplectic perturbations of the form (11), suppose that, in ordinary three-dimensional space, the x-y plane corresponds to a hypersurface in the reduced γ-space of distribution functions. One can then "warp" this plane into a curved two-dimensional surface by assigning to each x-y pair a coordinate z which corresponds to the numerical value assumed by the energy H. On this warped surface, the equilibrium points correspond to those pairs (x0, y0) which are extremal in z, so that any infinitesimally displaced point (x0 + δx, y0 + δy) assumes a new value z + δz. If the equilibrium point is a local energy minimum, any infinitesimal displacement on the surface necessarily increases the value of z, so that, in the neighbourhood of (x0, y0), the surface has the geometry of an upward opening paraboloid. Any perturbation comes 7 with positive energy and corresponds to bounded motion on the paraboloid. Thus the equilibrium is linearly stable. In principle, the same conclusion also obtains if the extremal point is a local maximum, although one can show that, for realistic equilibria, δ(2)H is never strictly negative. If, however, the equilibrium corresponds to a saddle point, so that z increases in some directions but decreases in others, the situation becomes more complicated. In this case, the linearised dynamics implies that it is possible to combine a very large negative energy perturbation in one direction with a very large positive energy perturbation in another to generate a total perturbation with vanishing energy. In itself, this does not guarantee a linear instability, but the simple geometric argument for stability that holds for a local minimum is no longer applicable.3 That saddle points need not imply linear instability may seem surprising at first glance. However, the following two-dimensional example makes clear exactly what can go wrong: H = 1 2(cid:16)v2 1 + ω2 1(cid:17) − 1x2 1 2(cid:16)v2 2 + ω2 2(cid:17). 2x2 (19) Here x1 = v1 = x2 = v2 = 0 is a time-independent extremal point in the phase space which corresponds to a saddle but, nevertheless, the equilibrium is clearly stable. This model may seem somewhat contrived but, as discussed in Section V of Kandrup and Morrison (1993), such stable saddle points are not uncommon in various infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems. The preceding argument for stability or lack thereof may seem somewhat unusual be- cause it is formulated abstractly in phase space, without the introduction of conjugate coordinates and momenta. One might therefore hope that, by identifying an appropriate set of conjugate variables, a more intuitive proof could be derived. In certain cases, this is in fact possible. One knows that, when formulated in the full Γ-space, the dynamics cannot be decomposed completely into canonical variables because of the existence of the Casimirs, which correspond to null vectors of the cosymplectic structure. If, however, one passes to the reduced γ space, where the values of all the Casimirs are frozen, one might expect that, at least locally, conjugate variables do exist. Indeed, for finite-dimensional systems it follows from Darboux's Theorem (cf. Arnold 1989) that, if the cosymplectic structure has vanishing determinant, i.e., if there are no null eigenvectors, it is always possible to find a set of canonically conjugate variables, at least locally (see Section V of Kandrup and Morrison [1993] for a detailed discussion of this point). One setting in which such a canonical formulation is possible is for the special case of linear perturbations of an equilibrium f0 which is a function only of the one-particle energy 3 Strictly speaking, the application of this finite-dimensional argument to an infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian system requires that the reduced phase space γ be endowed with a metric, so that one knows what is meant by distance between points. In practice, this can be done by introducing an appropriate L2 norm, which provides the natural extension of the Euclidean notion of distance to an infinite-dimensional space. In this context, a proof of stability entails showing that δf (t) remains bounded for all times. 8 E, i.e., f0 = f0(E), and for which the partial derivative FE ≡ ∂f /∂E is strictly negative. Physically the latter restriction implies that the system does not exhibit a population in- version; mathematically it ensures that division by FE is well defined. The basic idea, due originally to Antonov (1960), is to split the linearised perturbation δf into two pieces, δf+ and δf−, respectively even and odd under a velocity inversion v → −v, and to view the single linearised perturbation equation for δf as a coupled system for δf±. When linearised about some equilibrium f0, the CBE reduces to ∂tδf − {E, δf } − {Φ[δf ], f0} = 0, (20) where E is the particle energy associated with f0 and Φ[δf ] denotes the gravitational po- tential "sourced" (cf. eq. 2) by the perturbation δf . If one observes that E is an even function of v, that the Poisson bracket is odd under velocity inversion, and that Φ[δf−] vanishes identically, it is clear that eq. (20) is equivalent to the coupled system ∂tδf+ − {E, δf−} = 0 and ∂tδf− − {E, δf+} − {Φ[δf+], f0} = 0. (21) However, if one differentiates the second of these relations with respect to t, and uses the first to eliminate ∂tδf+, it follows that ∂2 t δf− = {E, {E, δf−}} + {Φ[{E, δf−}], f0} ≡ FE Aδf−, (22) where A denotes a linear operator. One can then show that, given the identification of δf− and ∂tδf− as conjugate variables, the equation (−FE)−1∂2 t δf− = −Aδf− (23) can be derived from the Hamiltonian 1 2 Z bH = 2 Z = 1 dΓ (−FE) (∂tδf−)2 + dΓ (−FE) (∂tδf−)2 + 1 2 Z dΓ δf−Aδf− 2Z (−FE ) dΓ 1 {E, δf−}2 − G 2 Z dΓ Z dΓ′ {E, δf−} {E ′, δf ′ x − x′ −} . (24) The connection between bH and the energy δ(2)H associated with a small symplectic per- turbation is discussed in Kandrup (1989). In particular, one can show that bH > 0 for all δf− if and only if δ(2)H > 0 for all symplectic perturbations. The fact that A is a symmetric (i.e., hermitian) operator facilitates a proof that the simple energy argument (cf. Laval, Mercier, and Pellat 1965) implies that the magnitude of δf−, and hence δf , is bounded in time if A is a positive operator, so that δ(2)H > 0, equilibrium f0(E) is linearly stable if and only if bH (and δ(2)H) is positive. Specifically, a whereas the possibility of perturbations with R dΓδf−Aδf− < 0 implies the existence of 9 solutions that grow exponentially. This is easy to understand in the language of normal modes. Since A is symmetric, it is clear that all solutions δf− ∝ exp(st) have s2 real, so If A is positive, s2 that the evolution is either purely oscillatory or purely exponential. must be negative, so that the modes are purely oscillatory. If, however, A is not a positive operator, there exist modes with s2 > 0, which implies an exponential instability.4 This sort of normal mode expansion facilitates a simple geometric picture of an infinite- dimensional configuration space of perturbations δf− which is (locally) embeddable in the reduced γ-space. The equilibrium f0, which is necessarily an extremal point of the full Hamiltonian H, satisfies δf− ≡ ∂tδf− ≡ 0. An arbitrary initial perturbation entails a ki- netic energy K = R dΓ(−FE)−1(∂tδf−)2 which is necessarily positive and a potential energy W = R dΓδf−Aδf− whose sign depends on the properties of A. If A is a positive opera- tor, the evolution in configuration space involves a particle with "mass" (−FE)−1 moving in an infinite-dimensional harmonic potential which corresponds to an upwards opening paraboloid. Linear stability is therefore assured. If, however, A is not always positive, δf− ≡ 0 corresponds to a saddle point, rather than a local minimum, and the flow is lin- early unstable. In visualising all of this, there is the strong temptation to think of the normal modes as being discrete, i.e., corresponding to honest square integrable eigenfunctions rather than singular eigendistributions. This, however, is not necessarily justified. Assuming completeness, one can always view any linear perturbation of an equilibrium f0(E) with FE < 0 as a superposition of normal modes, writing δf as a formal sum δf (x, v, t) = Xσ Aσgσ(x, v)exp(iσt), (25) where gσ labels the eigenvector, σ is the corresponding frequency, which is necessarily real, and Aσ is an expansion coefficient.5 Modulo largely unimportant technical details, the modes then divide into two types, namely: (1) a countable set of discrete frequencies belonging to the point spectrum, for which the corresponding eigenvectors are well-behaved (e.g., square-integrable) eigenfunctions; and (2) a continuous set of frequencies belonging to the continuous spectrum, for which the eigenvectors are singular eigendistributions. The distinction between these two types of modes is extremely important (cf. Habib, Kandrup, and Yip 1986). Because true eigenfunctions are nonsingular, they can in principle be triggered individually, i.e., one can choose a reasonable initial δf which populates only a single discrete mode. By contrast, because eigendistributions are singular, one cannot sample a single continuous mode. Rather, any smooth δf sampling the continuous spectrum must really be constructed as a wavepacket comprised of a continuous set of modes. The 4 In point of fact, one anticipates that, for this simple case, A is guaranteed to be positive. It is believed (cf. Binney and Tremaine 1987) that any f0 depending only on E corresponds to a spherically symmetric configuration; but assuming that the mass density ρ associated with f0 is spherical one can prove that A is indeed positive (cf. Kandrup 1989). 5 Strictly speaking, this sum must be interpreted (cf. Riesz and Nagy 1955) as a Stiltjes integral. 10 important point then is that, when evolved into the future, such a wavepacket implies a damping of coarse-grained observables like the density ρ. In other words, if the modes are continuous there is a precise sense in which the perturbation "dies away" and the system exhibits a coarse-grained approach towards the original equilibrium f0. The physics here is analogous to what arises in ordinary quantum mechanics. If, in that setting, one considers a physical observable like angular momentum with a discrete spectrum, one can construct well behaved eigenstates which, when evolved into the future, maintain their coherence for all time: the only effect of the evolution is a coherently oscil- lating phase. If, however, one considers an observable like position or linear momentum, where the spectrum is continuous, this is no longer so. In this case, a normalisable initial state must be constructed from a continuous set of singular eigendistributions, so that the best one can do is build a localised (e.g., minimum uncertainty) wavepacket. However, when evolved into the future such a wavepacket will necessarily spread because different eigendistributions have different phase velocities. It is this loss of coherence associated with the spreading of a wavepacket that corresponds to (linear) Landau damping. In the context of plasma physics, Landau damping was derived originally (Landau 1946) in a very different way, through the introduction of a Fourier- Laplace transform and an analysis of poles in the complex plane. However, at least for the electrostatic Vlasov equation (cf. Case 1959), i.e., the electrostatic analogue of the CBE, the mathematical equivalence of these two pictures of Landau damping is well understood. The physics underlying their equivalence is discussed in Kandrup (1998). For the special case of perturbations of an homogeneous neutral plasma characterised by an isotropic distribution of velocities that is everywhere nonvanishing, the modes can be computed explicitly (cf. Case 1959), and one finds generically that gσ(x, v) = exp(ik·x) gσ(v), (26) where gσ(v) is a singular eigendistribution involving a Dirac delta. In this setting, an examination of the perturbation associated with a given k-vector at a fixed phase space point (x0, v0) yields no evidence of damping away. Rather, one finds persistent oscillations ∝ exp[ik·(x0 − v0t)]. This is simply a manifestation of the fact that, without the introduc- tion of some coarse-graining, one cannot speak of the system returning to equilibrium. If, however, a coarse-graining is implemented by integrating over any finite range of velocities, one discovers that the resulting R d3v δf (x, v, t) will in fact damp away. The obvious question, therefore, is: will perturbations δf of a generic equilibrium solu- tion to the CBE correspond to discrete modes, continuous modes, or a combination of both? Unfortunately, this is a difficult question to answer. It appears impossible to calculate the modes explicitly for realistic equilibria, and a formal analysis is also difficult because the operator T entering into the linearised equation ∂tδf = T δf is not elliptic and involves a singular integral kernel. However, the normal modes can, and have, been computed for a variety of nontrivial equilibrium solutions to the corresponding electrostatic Vlasov equation 11 (cf. van Kampen 1955, Case 1959), and the results derived thereby would seem suggestive. Perhaps the most important result derived for the Vlasov equation is that discrete modes are seemingly the exception, rather than the norm, arising only if the equilibrium in question manifests nontrivial boundary conditions, e.g., the existence of a maximum speed vm such that f (v) ≡ 0 for v > vm. In particular, one can prove that the modes are always purely continuous if f0 is an analytic function of v in the complex plane.6 The best known example of a nonempty point spectrum is the case of so-called van Kampen (1955) modes, which arise precisely in those configurations where there is maximum velocity. In the usual interpretation (cf. Stix 1962), Landau damping is understood as resulting from a resonance between "particles" (the unperturbed f0) propagating with velocity v and a "wave" (the perturbation δf ) that propagates with phase velocity c. Discrete van Kampen modes correspond to perturbations which propagate with a phase velocity c for which f0(c) = 0, so that no resonance is possible. By analogy, one might therefore conjecture (cf. Habib, Kandrup, and Yip 1986) that, for the gravitational CBE, most perturbations will in fact correspond to continuous modes that damp away, but that some perturbations, especially longer wavelength disturbances that probe the phase space boundaries of the system, could in fact correspond to discrete modes. In this connection, it is interesting to note that there do in fact exist exact time- dependent solutions to the CBE, seemingly appropriate for a system like a galaxy, that exhibit finite amplitude undamped oscillations about some time-independent f0 (cf. Louis and Gerhart 1988, Sridhar 1989). The interesting point, then is that in all these models the time-independent f0 contains phase space "holes," i.e., regions in the middle of the occupied phase space region where f0 → 0. Whether these sorts of solutions are generic, and whether they could arise from reasonable initial conditions, is at the present unclear. of discrete modes. For example, if one considers the function x(t) = P29 Finally, it should be noted that, in point of fact, one can in principle get (at least temporary) phase mixing or loss of coherence even for the much simpler case of a finite set p=10 cos(0.1pt) over the finite interval 0 < t < 1000, one infers a rapid damping of the initial coherent excitation with x = 20 to a much smaller value oscillating about x = 0 with typical amplitude x ∼ 1. If, however, the evolution is tracked for a somewhat longer time one finds that the initial coherence is regained. An infinite set of continuous modes differs from this toy model in two important ways, namely (1) the recurrence time is infinitely long and (2) it is impossible to consider a smooth initial excitation that does not damp. 4. Nonlinear Stability and Global Evolution Suppose, once again, that attention is focused on some linearly stable equilibrium f0(E) 6 The validity of Landau's original derivation of exponential damping actually relies on the implicit assumption that f0 is analytic. If it is not, his manipulations of contours and evaluation of poles cannot be justified. 12 with FE < 0, but that one is now interested in the effects of larger perturbations δf , i.e., the problem of nonlinear stability. To the extent that the normal modes of the linear problem remain complete, one can still envision evolution in terms of these modes, the important point, however, being that, because of nonlinearities, the modes will now interact. This is, e.g., the basis for the standard quasilinear analyses implemented in plasma physics, which allow for the effects of the quadratic term ∇Φ·(∂δf /∂v) which is ignored when considering linear perturbations. Mode-mode couplings are important in that they facilitate the transfer of energy be- tween different modes, which makes the physics more complicated. However, one might still anticipate that, if the modes are continuous, Landau damping can and will occur. Because of the interactions between modes, the simple model of a dispersing quantum mechanical wavepacket is no longer directly applicable, but the basic phenomenon of loss of coherence is robust. Indeed, there are many examples in nonlinear dynamics of flows satisfying non- linear evolution equations where phase mixing occurs. It thus seems reasonable to suppose that, when considering the nonlinear evolution of some perturbation δf , one will encounter nonlinear Landau damping. For the case of an electrostatic plasma, nonlinear Landau damping is a well known, and reasonably well understood, phenomenon (cf. Davidson 1972 and references cited therein). Indeed, there are simple geometries where the nonlinear evo- lution can be computed explicitly in the context of a systematic perturbation expansion, thus facilitating analytic formulae for exactly how this phenomenon works (cf. Montgomery 1963). Mode-mode couplings can also lead to another important possibility, namely the onset of chaos. Because f0 is a local energy minimum, one knows that any infinitesimal pertur- bation δf will simply oscillate, each eigenvector corresponding to motion in a "direction" in configuration space that is orthogonal to the motion of all the other eigenvectors. This implies that, for the fixed point f0, the Lyapunov exponents, which were defined in eq. (13) as probing the average linear instability of the orbit generated from some initial f (0), must all vanish identically. One might anticipate further that, when evolved into the future, other phase space points sufficiently close to f0 will also correspond to regular orbits with vanishing Lyapunov exponents. Thus, e.g., for finite-dimensional systems one knows that there is a regular phase space region of finite measure surrounding every stable periodic or- bit. However, for sufficiently large δf , where mode-mode couplings become significant and the motion cannot be well approximated by orthogonal harmonic oscillations, one might anticipate that many, if not all, perturbations will evolve chaotically. If true, this would suggest that a "typical" perturbation with δH = H[f0 + δf ] − H[f0] will evolve ergodically on (some subset of) the constant energy hypersurface in the γ-space with energy H[f0 + δf ]. This idea of the onset and development of chaos is an infinite-dimensional generalisa- tion of what is typically found when considering the motion of a point mass in a multi- 13 dimensional nonlinear potential which has only one extremal point, a global minimum.7 Low energy orbits sufficiently close to the pit of the potential move in what is essentially a harmonic potential, so that their motion is regular. If, however, the energy is raised one finds generically that, unless the motions in different directions remain completely decou- pled, there is an onset of global stochasticity which leads, for sufficiently high energies, to well developed chaotic regions. This configuration space description is not appropriate when considering generic equi- libria, where the energy bH associated with a small perturbation cannot be written easily as a functional of conjugate variables, and there is no guarantee that bH can be written as a simple sum of kinetic and potential contributions, K and W. Modulo technical details, one might expect that canonical phase space coordinates do exist, at least in principle, but the energy bH associated with the tangent dynamics could in general be an arbitrary quadratic functional bH[q, p] of the conjugate variables q and p. Moreover, even for the simple model of an equilibrium f0(E) with FE < 0, it may not be possible to extend the canonical de- scription to allow for arbitrarily large perturbations δf . One really needs to return to a full phase space description. As discussed in Section 3, if for some equilibrium f0 the second variation δ(2)H is positive for all δf , a linearised perturbation corresponds in phase space to stable motion on an upwards opening infinite-dimensional paraboloid. As long as this surface remains convex, one would anticipate that stability will persist and, as such, one would expect intuitively that the equilibrium could remain nonlinearly stable even for small but finite δf . The normal modes of the linearised problem become coupled, but the geometric argument for stability should remain valid. In particular, one can presumably visualise the evolution of δf as involving nonlinear phase space oscillations about the equilibrium point f0. If, however, f0 corresponds to a stable saddle, one might suppose that even the smallest nonlinearities could trigger an instability (cf. Moser 1968, Morrison 1987). Thus, e.g., for the simple toy model of two stable oscillators described by eq. (19), it is possible to trigger an instability by introducing even very tiny mode-mode couplings which allow energy to be transferred between modes. Indeed, as noted by Cherry (1925), if the two frequencies are in an appropriate resonance, e.g., ω2 1, the introduction of a simple cubic coupling implies that initial data arbitrarily close to x1 = v1 = x2 = v2 = 0 can lead to solutions in which x1, x2, v1, and v2 all diverge in a finite time. If true, this expectation about saddle points would suggest that, even though they can be linearly stable, they cannot represent reasonable candidate equilibria in terms of which to model real astronomical objects. 2 = 2ω2 If a linearly stable f0 corresponds to a unique extremal point in the γ-space, the surface which near f0 is a paraboloid will remain upwards opening even if δf is very large, so that stability should persist for arbitrarily large perturbations. In other words, one would 7Even order truncations of the Toda potential (cf. Kandrup and Mahon 1994) provide a simple two-dimensional example. 14 expect that the equilibrium f0 is globally stable: In this case, any phase space deformation δf increases the energy, and the evolution of an initial δf (0) will involve nonlinear phase space oscillations around the unique stable fixed point. If, however, there exist multiple extremal points in the γ-space, each corresponding to a local energy minimum, the situation is much more complicated. In this case, one would anticipate that, for sufficiently large δf , the distribution function can actually be transferred from the "basin of attraction" of one equilibrium f0 to the "basin" of some other f1. In other words, the evolution of δf (0) could yield oscillations around f1, rather than f0. By suitably fine-tuning the perturbation, one can in principle displace the system from any one basin to any other. However, by analogy with the behaviour observed in finite- dimensional systems, one might expect generically that, if the perturbation is sufficiently large, its motion can be interpreted as involving nonlinear phase space oscillations about the global energy minimum. To the extent that this is true, one would anticipate that a sufficiently large perturbation will tend generically to push f into the "basin of attraction" of the equilibrium f0 that corresponds to a global energy minimum. If one considers an initial perturbation δf (0) that is sufficiently large, the subsequent evolution will in general be almost completely unrelated to the initial equilibrium f0 and, as such, the way in which one visualises the evolution δf (0) is really no different from the way in which one can, and arguably should, envision the evolution of a generic f (0). In other words, the physical picture described above can be used equally well to visualise generic flows associated with the initial value problem, the only difference being that, in general, one may know nothing at all about what time-independent equilibria f0 actually exist. Specification of an initial f (0) fixes the values of all the Casimirs for all times, thus determining γ, the reduced infinite-dimensional phase space which constitutes the natural arena of physics. This f (0) also fixes the numerical value of the conserved energy H and, as such, determines the constant energy hypersurface in the γ-space to which the flow is nec- essarily restricted. By analogy with finite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems (cf. Kandrup and Mahon 1994) one might expect that, when evolved into the future, f (0) will exhibit a coarse-grained approach towards an invariant measure on this hypersurface, i.e., a suitably defined microcanonical distribution. If the flow associated with f (0) is chaotic, one might anticipate an approach towards this invariant measure that is exponential in time. If, alter- natively, the flow is regular, one might instead expect a power law approach. However, in either case one might anticipate an approach towards a "phase-mixed" invariant measure. In this context, the crucial question is then: to what extent can this invariant measure be interpreted as corresponding to a distribution function f executing phase space oscillations about one or more equilibrium solutions f0? It is easy to see that, in the γ-space, there must exist one or more extremal points with δ(1)H = 0, these corresponding to equilibrium solutions f0 for which all the Casimirs share the same values as the Casimirs associated with f (0). Indeed, one knows that, for sufficiently smooth initial data, the CBE admits global existence (cf. Pfaffelmoser 1992, 15 Schaeffer 1991), so that δf cannot diverge and, presumably, the Hamiltonian is bounded from below. However, this implies that there must exist at least one f0, namely the global energy minimum (although in principle the global minimum could be degenerate). The question therefore becomes: in the basin of which f0 (or f0's) does the flow reside? In principle, the evolved distribution function f could execute phase space oscillations about any f0 with lower energy, which one presumably depending on the initial f (0). How- ever, one might conjecture that, if the initial f (0) is sufficiently far from any equilibrium f0, it will execute oscillations around the global minimum f0. The initial f (0) cannot exhibit a pointwise approach towards this, or any other, f0. However, one might expect that, in general, the initial deviation δf (0) = f (0) − f0 will exhibit nonlinear Landau damping so that, in terms of observables like the density ρ, δf does indeed "die away," and one can speak of a coarse-grained approach towards the equilibrium f0. 5. Conclusions and Unanswered Questions The aim of this paper is to suggest a potentially fruitful way in which to visualise flows described by the CBE and, in particular, the expected coarse-grained approach towards an equilibrium. No claim is made regarding mathematical rigor, and it is not clear that all the details are completely correct. However, the viewpoint developed here does have the advantage that it incorporates what is known rigorously about the CBE, and that it provides a framework in terms of which to pose precise, well defined questions. In this context, there are at least three basic questions which, if answered satisfactorily, would yield important insights into the physical properties of a flow generated by the CBE: 1. Will generic initial conditions exhibit effective Landau damping, thus allowing one to speak of an efficient coarse-grained evolution towards some equilibrium f0? In the context of linear Landau damping, the answer to this question depends on the spectral properties of the linearised evolution equation. If the modes are all continuous, every initial perturbation will eventually phase mix away, so that physical observables like the density will damp to zero. If, however, some of the modes are discrete, it is possible to construct initial perturbations that do not damp away. At the present time, it is not clear whether, for realistic galactic models, the spectrum is purely continuous, although the investigation of various toy models is currently underway (Lynden-Bell 1997, private communication). To the extent that N -body simulations are reliable and that, for sufficiently large N , they capture the same physics as the CBE, the fact that most initial conditions yield an efficient approach towards some statistical equilibrium can be interpreted as evidence that nonlinear Landau damping is in general very effective. However, there do exist toy models like one-dimensional gravity where one ends up with undamped oscillations. For example, the evolution of counterstreaming initial conditions in one-dimensional systems (either gravitational or electrostatic) can lead to a final state which corresponds seemingly to a distribution function f exhibiting finite amplitude undamped oscillations about a (near- 16 ) equilibrium f0 (cf. Mineau, Feix, and Rouet 1990). This toy model actually corroborates the physical intuition described in this paper in the sense that, as one would expect, the phase space contains a large "hole," i.e., a region where f0 → 0. Whether or not analogous results obtain for two- and three-dimensional systems is as yet unclear, although the problem is currently under investigation (Habib, Kandrup, Pogorelov, and Ryne, work in progress). 2. Are functional Lyapunov exponents the "right" way in which to identify chaos in infinite- dimensional systems and, assuming that they are, will a generic flow associated with the CBE be chaotic? Given this definition, will standard results from finite-dimensional chaos remain at least approximately valid? Although not proven for generic finite-dimensional systems, there is the physical expectation that, when evolved into the future, a chaotic initial condition will evolve towards an invariant distribution on a time scale that is related somehow to the spectrum of Lyapunov exponents. This implies however that, at asymptot- ically late times, one can visualise the flow as densely filling a chaotic phase space region of finite measure. Assuming, however, that this is true, the Ergodic Theorem provides im- portant information about the statistical properties of the flow, implying the equivalence of time and phase space averages (cf. Lichtenberg and Lieberman 1992). One other point about chaos in the CBE should be stressed: The definition proposed in this paper is, at least superficially, completely decoupled from the (also interesting) question of whether individual orbits in a self-consistent potential generated from the CBE are, or are not, chaotic. This latter question refers to the behaviour of nearby trajectories in the six-dimensional particle phase space. The "natural" definition of chaos for the CBE should presumably reflect properties of the flow in the infinite-dimensional phase space of distribution functions. 3. For a specified initial f (0), towards which equilibrium f0 will the system evolve? Given f (0), one can compute the numerical value of all possible Casimirs, thus identifying explicitly the γ-space to which the evolution is restricted. The obvious problem, then, is to identify all time-independent equilibria f0 in γ and to determine which initial conditions correspond to which equilibria. Although unquestionably difficult, this is a problem that is both well defined mathematically and well motivated physically. Finding all equilibria is equivalent mathematically to finding all extremal points in γ. However, to the extent that one chooses to visualise the flow as involving oscillations in the γ-space, there is no question physically but that the extremal points define "basins of attraction" associated with the oscillations. The basic points described in this paper are easily summarised: 1. The CBE is a Hamiltonian system, albeit an unusual one. The fundamental dynamical variable is the distribution function f , not the particle x's and v's; and it is not always possible (at least easily) to identify canonically conjugate variables. 2. Because the CBE is Hamiltonian, there can be no pointwise approach towards equilibrim. The best for which one can hope is a coarse-grained approach towards equilibrium. 3. Even though the phase space γ associated with the dynamics is infinite-dimensional, one 17 might expect that much of one's intuition from finite-dimensional systems remains valid. In particular, one might anticipate an asymptotic approach towards an invariant measure, and one might hope to make meaningful distinctions between regular and chaotic flows. 4. The phenomenon normally designated as linear Landau damping can be interpreted as a phase mixing of a continuous set of normal modes. Whether a small initial perturbation will always eventually Landau damp/phase mix away depends on whether the normal modes for the linearised perturbation equation are discrete or continuous. 5. To the extent that one's ordinary intuition about finite-dimensional phase spaces remains approximately valid, the evolution of generic initial data should be interpreted as involving nonlinear (phase space) oscillations about one or more energy extremals, which correspond to time-independent equilibria f0. The phenomenon of violent relaxation should thus be interpreted as nonlinear phase mixing/Landau damping which, if efficient, will facilitate a coarse-grained approach towards equilibrium. Acknowledgments I am pleased to acknowledge useful discussions, collaborations, and correspondence with Salman Habib, Donald Lynden-Bell, Bruce Miller, Phil Morrison, and Daniel Pfenniger. I am grateful to Barbara Eckstein for comments on the exposition. Work on this manuscript began while I was a visitor at the Observatoire de Marseille, where I was supported by the C.N.R.S., and continued during a visit to the Aspen Center for Physics. Limited financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation grant PHY92-03333. 18 Antonov, V. A. 1960, Astr. Zh. 37, 918 (English trans. in Sov. Astr. -- AJ 4, 859 [1961]). Arnold, V. I. 1989, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Bartholomew, P. 1971, MNRAS 151, 333. Binney, J. and Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics, Princeton University Press, Prince- ton. Case, K. M. 1959, Ann. Phys. (NY) 7, 349. Cherry, T. M. 1925, Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 23, 199. Davidson, R. C. 1972, Methods of Nonlinear Plasma Theory, Academic Press, New York. Habib, S., Kandrup, H. E., and Yip, P. F. 1986, Ap. J. 309, 176. Kandrup, H. E. 1990, Ap. J. 351, 104. Kandrup, H. E. 1991a, Ap. J. 370, 312. Kandrup, H. E. 1991b, Ap. J. 380, 511. Kandrup, H. E. 1998, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., in press. Kandrup, H. E. and Mahon, M. E. 1994, Phys. Rev. E 49, 3735. Kandrup, H. E. and Morrison, P. J. 1993, Ann. Phys. (NY) 225, 114. Landau, L. D. 1946, Soviet Phys. - JETP 10, 25. Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. 1960, Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Laval, G., Mercier, C., and Pellat, R. 1965, Nucl. Fusion 5, 156. Lichtenberg, A. J. and Lieberman, M. A. 1992, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, Berlin, Springer, 2nd ed. Louis, P. D. and Gerhart, O. 1988, MNRAS 233, 337. Lynden-Bell, D. 1967, MNRAS 136, 101 Lynden-Bell, D. and Sanitt, N. 1969, MNRAS 143, 167. Maoz, E. 1991, Ap. J. 275, 687. Mineau, P., Feix, M. R., and Rouet, J. L. 1990, Astron. Astrophys. 228, 344. Montgomery, D. 1963, Phys. Fluids A6, 1109. Moser, J. K. 1968, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 81, 1. Morrison, P. J. 1980, Phys. Lett. A 80, 383. Morrison, P. J. 1987, Z. Naturforsch. 42a, 1115. Morrison, P. J. and Eliezur, S. 1986, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4205. Perez, J. and Aly. J.-J. 1996, MNRAS 280, 689. Perez, J., Alimi, J.-M., Aly, J.-J., and Scholl, H. 1996, MNRAS 280, 700. Pfaffelmoser, K. 1992, J. Diff. Eqns. 95, 281. Riesz, F. and Sz.-Nagy, B. 1955, Functional Analysis, Ungar, New York. Schaeffer, J. 1991, Commun. Part. Diff. Eqns. 16, 1313 Sridhar, S. 1989, MNRAS 201, 939. Stix, T. H. 1962, The Theory of Plasma Waves, McGraw-Hill, New York. van Kampen, N. G. 1955, Physica 21, 949. 19
astro-ph/0701313	2	0701	2007-01-25T07:55:20	On the Primordial Helium Abundance and the DeltaY/DeltaO Ratio	[ "astro-ph" ]	We present a review on the determination of the primordial helium abundance, Yp, based on the study of hydrogen and helium recombination lines in extragalactic H II regions. We also discuss the observational determinations of the increase of helium to the increase of oxygen by mass Delta Y/Delta O, and compare them with predictions based on models of galactic chemical evolution.	astro-ph	astro-ph	FULL TITLE ASP Conference Series, Vol. VOLUME, YEAR OF PUBLICATION NAMES OF EDITORS On the Primordial Helium Abundance and the ∆Y /∆O Ratio Manuel Peimbert1, Valentina Luridiana2, Antonio Peimbert1, & Leticia Carigi1 Abstract. We present a review on the determination of the primordial helium abun- dance, Yp, based on the study of hydrogen and helium recombination lines in extragalactic H ii regions. We also discuss the observational determinations of the increase of helium to the increase of oxygen by mass ∆Y /∆O, and compare them with predictions based on models of galactic chemical evolution. 1. Why Yp? The determination of Yp is important for at least the following reasons: a) It is one of the pillars of Big Bang cosmology and an accurate determination of Yp permits to test the standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis (SBBN), b) the models of stellar evolution require an accurate initial Y value; this is given by Yp plus the additional Y produced by galactic chemical evolution, which can be estimated based on the ∆Y /∆O ratio, c) the combination of Yp and ∆Y /∆O is needed to test models of galactic chemical evolution, d) to test solar models it is necessary to know the initial solar abundances, which are different to the photospheric ones due to diffusive settling, this effect reduces the helium and heavy element abundances in the solar photosphere relative to that of hydrogen, the initial solar abundances can be provided by models of galactic chemical evolution, e) the determination of the Y value in metal poor H ii regions requires a deep knowledge of their physical conditions, in particular the Y determination depends to a significant degree on their density and temperature distribution, therefore accurate Y determinations combined with the assumption of SBBN provide a constraint on the density and temperature structure of H ii regions. 2. Recent Determinations of Yp Previous reviews on Yp determinations have been presented by Peimbert et al. (2003) and Luridiana (2003). Recent determinations of Yp are those by Izotov et al. (1999), Izotov & Thuan (2004), Izotov et al. (2006), Luridiana et al. (2003), Olive & Skillman (2004), Fukugita & Kawasaki (2006), and Peimbert et al. (2007). 1Instituto de Astronom´ıa, Universidad Nacional Aut´onoma de M´exico; Apdo. postal 70 -- 264; Ciudad Universitaria; M´exico D.F. 04510; Mexico. 2Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Andaluc´ıa (CSIC), Camino bajo de Hu´etor 50, 18008 Granada, Spain. 1 2 Peimbert et al. A critical discussion of these determinations has been presented by Peimbert et al. (2007). Most of the differences among these determinations are due to system- atic effects. 3. Error Budget The error budget of the Yp determination by Peimbert et al. (2007) is presented in Table 1. In this table the sources of error are listed in order of importance. The error budgets of Yp determinations by other groups are different to that by Peimbert et al. (2007) for many reasons, each error budget depends on the sample of H ii regions used and on the treatment given to the different sources of error. Table 1. Error budget in the Yp determination Problem Estimated error Collisional Excitation of the H i Lines Temperature Structure O (∆Y /∆O) Correction Recombination Coefficients of the He i Lines Density Structure Underlying Absorption in the He i Lines Recombination Coefficients of the H i Lines Underlying Absorption in the H i Lines Ionization Structure Collisional Excitation of the He i Lines Reddening correction Optical Depth of the He i Triplet Lines He i and H i Line Intensities ±0.0015 ±0.0010 ±0.0010 ±0.0010 ±0.0007 ±0.0007 ±0.0005 ±0.0005 ±0.0005 ±0.0005 ±0.0005 ±0.0003 ±0.0003 4. The Four Main Sources of Error The most important source of error is the collisional excitation of Balmer lines. Neutral hydrogen atoms in excited states may form not only by the usual pro- cess of H+ recombination, but also through collisions of neutral hydrogen with electrons. The recombination cascade that follows such excitations contributes to the observed intensity of Balmer lines, mimicking a larger relative hydrogen abundance and, hence, a smaller helium abundance. To estimate this contri- bution it is necessary to have a tailored photoionization model for each object that fits properly the temperature structure. The contribution to the Balmer line intensities depends strongly on the temperature: therefore this effect, and consequently the associated error in its estimate, increases for H ii regions of lower metallicity and consequently higher temperature. The second most important source of error is the temperature structure. Most determinations neglect the possible presence of temperature variations across the H ii region structure and assume that T (O iii) is representative of the zone where the He i recombination lines form. However, other temperature Primordial Helium 3 determinations based on different diagnostics yield lower values; furthermore, photoionization models do not predict the high T (O iii) values observed. These results indicate that temperature variations are indeed present in H ii regions, and this result should be included in the Y determination (Peimbert et al. 2002). The best procedure to take into account the temperature structure is to self- consistently determine T (He ii) from a set of He i lines by means of the maximum likelihood method. The Y abundances derived from T (He ii) are typically lower by about 0.0030 − 0.0050 than those derived from T (O iii). The difference between both temperatures does not have a significant trend with the metallicity of the H ii region, hence the systematic error introduced by the use of T (O iii) in the Y determination is similar for objects with different metallicities. The error quoted under "Temperature Structure" in Table 1 is the residual error due to the uncertainty in the T (He ii) determinations of the dataset by Peimbert et al. (2007). The third most important source of error is the extrapolation of the derived Y values to zero metallicity through the ∆Y /∆O ratio. This problem will be discussed in the next section. The fourth most important source of error is the uncertainty on the recombination coefficients of the He i lines. 5. ∆Y /∆O from Models and Observations To determine the Yp value it is customary to use the Y values of a set of O poor galaxies and to extrapolate the Y values to the case of O = 0 using the following equation: Yp = Y − O ∆Y ∆O , (1) where O is the oxygen abundance per unit mass. To obtain an accurate Yp value, a reliable determination of ∆Y /∆O for O-poor objects is needed. The ∆Y /∆O value derived by Peimbert et al. (2000) from observational re- sults and models of chemical evolution of galaxies amounts to 3.5 ± 0.9. More recent results are those by Peimbert (2003) who finds 2.93 ± 0.85 from ob- servations of 30 Dor and NGC 346, and by Izotov et al. (2006) who, from the observations of 82 H ii regions, find ∆Y /∆O = 4.3 ± 0.7. We have recomputed the value by Izotov et al. considering two systematic effects not considered by them: the fraction of oxygen trapped in dust grains, which we estimate to be 10% for objects of low metallicity, and the increase in the O abundances due to explicit taking into account the presence of temperature fluctuations, which for this type of H ii regions we estimate to be about 0.08 dex (Relano et al. 2002). From these considerations we obtain for the Izotov et al. sample a ∆Y /∆O = 3.2 ± 0.6. From chemical evolution models of galaxies it is found that ∆Y /∆O depends on: the stellar yields, the initial mass function, the star formation rate, the age, and the O value of the galaxy in question. Models with substantial outflows of O-rich material can produce large ∆Y /∆O ratios but they are ruled out by the low C/O values observed in irregular galaxies (Carigi et al. 1995, 1999, 2006). Carigi & Peimbert (2007) have produced chemical evolution models of the following types: closed box, inflow of gas, and outflow of gas of well-mixed 4 Peimbert et al. Figure 1. Two chemical evolution models for NGC 6822 with different gas infall and outflow histories, and the same star formation rate derived from observations. The models are the 7L and 8S (continuous and dashed lines, re- spectively) studied by Carigi et al. (2006). The first panel shows the increase of the helium and oxygen abundances relative to the primordial values, the second panel shows the gaseous content as a function of time, which is widely different for the two models, and the third panel shows the star formation history, which is the same one in both models. material. They find that ∆Y /∆O is practically constant for models with the same IMF, the same age, the same star formation history, and an O abundance smaller than ∼ 4×10−3. They find also that 2.4 < ∆Y /∆O < 4.1 for models with different star formation histories and different values of the upper mass limit of the IMF. The results derived from the chemical evolution models are in very good agreement with the observations mentioned above. Based on the observations and models discussed, Peimbert et al. (2007) adopted a value of ∆Y /∆O = 3.3 ± 0.7 in the computation of the error budget presented in Table 1 and the Yp value presented in Table 2. Primordial Helium 5 For models of galactic chemical evolution that reach values of O > 4 × 10−3 at present time, the ∆Y /∆O ratio of the interstellar medium increases with the O abundance due to two effects: the helium production by low and intermediate mass stars and the increase of the helium yield of massive stars due to stellar winds. As an example of the minor role that well mixed outflows play in the chemical evolution of galaxies in Figure 1 we present the ∆Y versus ∆O be- havior for two chemical evolution models of NGC 6822 (Carigi et al. 2006; Carigi & Peimbert 2007). These models have the same SFH, which was de- rived from observations, but are drastically different in their gas flow histories and show practically the same ∆Y /∆O behavior. To compute stellar evolution models with O < 4 × 10−3 we propose to use the following relation for the initial Y and O abundances Y = 0.2474 ± 0.0028 + (3.3 ± 0.7)O. (2) For O > 4 × 10−3 (Carigi & Peimbert 2007), Y increases faster with the increase of O than in the previous equation. The ratio ∆Y /∆O can also be expressed in terms of ∆Y /∆Z if the fraction of O/Z is known. Based on observations of galactic and extragalactic H ii regions, we propose to assume that, for models with O < 4 × 10−3, O constitutes 55% ± 5% of the total Z value, implying ∆Y /∆Z = 2.0 ± 0.6. For O > 4 × 10−3 the fraction of Z due to O decreases due to the increase of the C/O, N/O and Fe/O ratios with the increase of O. From the chemical composition of the Orion nebula and M17 it is found that the fraction of Z due to O drops to about 42% for 0.0057 < O < 0.0082 (e.g. Peimbert 2003; Esteban et al. 2004; Garc´ıa-Rojas et al. 2007, and references therein). Previous determinations of the ∆Y /∆Z ratio based on models or observa- tions have been in the 1.0 to 6.0 range (e.g. Peimbert 1995; Fukugita & Kawasaki 2006, and references therein). It is interesting to note that 25 years ago Chiosi & Matteucci (1982) determined a value of ∆Y /∆Z ∼ 2.0, in excellent agreement with the re- cent results by Carigi & Peimbert (2007). 6. Discussion In Table 2 we present some of the best Yp determinations of the last few years. The Yp values and their statistical errors are the ones presented in the original papers. After the statistical error we list the systematic error estimated by us, which depends on one or more of the following sources: a) the change in the published emissivities of the He i lines (Porter et al. 2005); b) the change in the published collisional excitation coefficients of the H i lines (Anderson et al. 2000, 2002); and c) the temperature structure of the H ii region. Adopting the new He i emissivities, the Y determination of individual H ii regions is increased by about 0.004. The change in the H i collisional excitation coefficients goes in the same direction (Peimbert et al. 2007), although in this case the size of this effect varies from object to object and a tailored photoionization model for each object is needed to obtain a good estimate of it. Both effects produce an increase in the Yp determination: for the sample of H ii regions used by Peimbert et al. (2007), the increase in Yp due to the adoption of the new He i emissivities amounts to 6 Peimbert et al. about 0.0040, while the increase due to the adoption of the new H i collisional excitation coefficients amounts to 0.0025. Finally, the Y value of individual H ii regions decreases when the temperature structure of the H ii region is taken into account, since in the self-consistent solutions for all the observed He i line intensities, the lower T (He ii) values imply higher densities, the higher densities produce a higher collisional contribution to the He i intensities, and consequently lower helium abundances. For the objects in the sample used by Peimbert et al. (2002) and Peimbert et al. (2007), this effect decreases the Y determinations by amounts ranging from 0.003 to 0.009. The Yp determination by Izotov et al. (1999) is affected by all three of the above sources of systematic error; those by Luridiana et al. (2003) and Izotov & Thuan (2004) are affected by sources a) and b), while the one by Izotov et al. (2006) is affected by source b). The disagreement between the Yp derived by Luridiana et al. (2003) with the Yp derived from WMAP under the assumption of SBBN implies the need for "new physics". The new physics needed to reconcile the two Yp values turned out to be the "new atomic physics" by Anderson et al. (2000, 2002) and Porter et al. (2005). With the new physics Peimbert et al. (2007) found agreement, within the observational errors, be- tween the observed Yp value and that derived from the WMAP results under the assumption of SBBN. The Yp derived by Peimbert et al. (2007) together with SBBN implies that Ωbh2 = 0.02054 ± 0.00639 (Steigman 2006a,b), where Ωb is the baryon closure parameter, and h is the Hubble parameter. This value is in excellent agreement with the value derived by Spergel et al. (2006) from the WMAP results under the assumption of SBBN, which amounts to Ωbh2 = 0.02233 ± 0.00082. The comparison of the Yp derived by Peimbert et al. (2007) with the Yp derived by Spergel et al. (2006) from the WMAP data together with the as- sumption of SBBN provides strong constraints for the study of non SBBN (e.g. Cyburt et al. 2005; Coc et al. 2006, and references therein). In Table 2 we also present our Yp prediction for 2010. We consider that in the next few years it will be possible to reduce the statistical errors in the Yp determination to about 0.0020 by obtaining a new set of observations of brighter and slightly O-richer H ii regions than the ones that have been used so far. A more extensive discussion of the relative advantages of these H ii regions with respect to more metal-poor ones can be found in Peimbert et al. (2007). 7. Summary and conclusions In this contribution we have presented some recent determinations of Yp and discussed the reasons underlying the differences between them. For the most recent determination, the one by Peimbert et al. (2007), we have presented the error budget in terms of thirteen different sources of error. The ∆Y /∆O ratio, which enters as a crucial factor in one of the three main sources of error, has been discussed in the light of recent observations and models of galactic chemical evolution. The Yp determinations by different groups are slowly converging among them as systematic errors are progressively identified and corrected for. The need for "new physics" that had been suggested by recent results (e.g., Luridiana et al. Primordial Helium 7 Table 2. Primordial helium abundance values a Source Yp Izotov et al. (1999), this work Luridiana et al. (2003), this work Izotov & Thuan (2004), this work Izotov et el. (2006), this work Peimbert et al. (2007) Prediction (2010), this work Spergel et al. (2006) 0.2452 ± 0.0015 ± 0.0100 0.2391 ± 0.0020 ± 0.0070 0.2421 ± 0.0021 ± 0.0075 0.2462 ± 0.0025 ± 0.0040 0.2474 ± 0.0028 0.2??? ± 0.0020 0.2482 ± 0.0004 a Direct Yp determinations based on observations of H ii regions, with the exception of that by Spergel et al. (2006), which is based on the baryon to photon ratio derived from WMAP and the assumption of SBBN. 2003) seems now to be fulfilled by new atomic physics, i.e. the atomic data by Anderson et al. (2000, 2002) and Porter et al. (2005). On the other hand, the temperature structure of H ii regions is still a source of systematic error if an appropriate scheme for temperature is not adopted. The proper temperature to determine the helium abundance is T (He ii), derived self-consistently from the intensities of the helium lines. Adopting this temperature, the Yp value derived from H ii regions agrees with the Yp derived from the WMAP data under the assumption of SBBN. On the other hand, the use of T (O iii) to determine the Y values from H ii regions produces Yp values from 0.003 to 0.006 higher than those found adopting T (He ii), that is Yp values more than 1σ higher than the one predicted by the WMAP observations combined with the assumption of SBBN. It is important to continue the effort on the study of the physical conditions in H ii regions, this effort will permit us to lower the error on the Yp determi- nation, which in turn will permit us to improve our knowledge on the possible importance of non SBBN. Acknowledgments. This work was partly supported by the CONACyT grant 46904 and by the Spanish Programa Nacional de Astronom´ıa y Astrof´ısica through the project AYA2004-07466. VL is supported by a CSIC-I3P fellowship. References Anderson, H., Ballance, C. P., Badnell, N. R., & Summers, H. P. 2000, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 33, 1255 Anderson, H., Ballance, C. P., Badnell, N. R., & Summers, H. P. 2002, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics, 35, 1613 Carigi, L., Col´ın, P., & Peimbert, M. 1999, ApJ, 514, 787 Carigi, L., Col´ın, P., & Peimbert, M. 2006, ApJ, 644, 924 Carigi, L., Col´ın, P., Peimbert, M., & Sarmiento, A. 1995, ApJ, 445, 98 Carigi, L., & Peimbert, M. 2007, ApJ, to be submitted Chiosi, C., & Matteucci, F. 1982, A&A, 105, 140 Coc, A., Nunes, N. J., Olive, K. A., Usan, J.-P. & Vangion, E. 2006, astro-ph/0610733 Cyburt, R. H., Fields, B. D., Olive, K. A., & Skillman, E. 2005, Astroparticle Physics, 23, 313 8 Peimbert et al. Esteban, C., Peimbert, M., Garc´ıa-Rojas, J., Ruiz, M. T., Peimbert, A., & Rodr´ıguez, M. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 229 Fukugita, M., & Kawasaki, M. 2006, ApJ, 646, 691 Garc´ıa-Rojas, J., Esteban, C., Peimbert, A., Rodr´ıguez, M., Peimbert, M., & Ruiz, M. T. 2007, RevMexAA, in press, astro-ph/0610065 Izotov, Y. I., Chaffee, F. H., Foltz, C. B., Green, R. F., Guseva, N. G., & Thuan, T. X. 1999, ApJ, 527, 757 Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Blecha, A., Royer, F., Guseva, N. G., & North, P. 2006, A&A, 459, 71 Izotov, V. I., & Thuan, T. X. 2004, ApJ, 602, 200 Luridiana, V. 2003, proceedings of the XXXVIIth Moriond Astrophysics Meeting "The Cosmological Model" eds. Y. Giraud-H´eraud, C. Magneville, J. Tran Thanh Van, The Gioi Publishers (Vietnam), 159 (astro-ph/0209177) Luridiana, V., Peimbert, A., Peimbert, M., & Cervino, M. 2003, ApJ, 592, 846 Olive, K. A., & Skillman, E. D. 2004, ApJ, 617, 29 Peimbert, A. 2003, ApJ, 584, 735 Peimbert, A., Peimbert, M., & Luridiana, V. 2002 ApJ, 565, 668 Peimbert, M. 2003, in The Light Element Abundances, ed. P. Crane (Springer), p. 165, 1995. Peimbert, M., Luridiana, V., & Peimbert, A. 2007, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0701580) Peimbert, M., Peimbert, A., Luridiana, V. & Ruiz, M. T. 2003, in Star Formation through Time, ASP Conference Series, 297, 81 Peimbert, M., Peimbert, A., & Ruiz, M. T. 2000, ApJ, 541, 688 Porter, R. L., Bauman, R. P., Ferland, G. J. , & MacAdam, K. B. 2005, ApJ, 622L, 73 Relano, M., Peimbert, M., & Beckman, J. 2002, ApJ, 564, 704 Spergel, D. N. et al. 2006, astro-ph/0603449 Steigman, G. 2006a, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 15, 1, astro-ph/0511534 Steigman, G. 2006b, astro-ph/0606206
astro-ph/0301261	1	0301	2003-01-14T17:19:23	Blue Straggler Stars: a direct comparison of Star counts and population ratios in six Galactic Globular Clusters	[ "astro-ph" ]	The central regions of six Galactic Globular Clusters (GGCs) (M3, M80, M10, M13, M92 and NGC 288) have been imaged using HST-WFPC2 and the ultraviolet (UV) filters (F255W, F336W). The selected sample covers a large range in both central density and metallicity ([Fe/H]). In this paper, we present a direct cluster-to-cluster comparison of the Blue Stragglers Stars (BSS) population as selected from (m_{255},m_{255}-m_{336}) Color Magnitude Diagrams (CMDs). We have found:(a) BSS in three of the clusters (M3, M80, M92) are much more concentrated toward the center of the cluster than the red giants; because of the smaller BSS samples for the other clusters we can only note that the BSS radial distributions are consistent with central concentration; (b) the specific frequency of BSS varies greatly from cluster to cluster. The most interesting result is that the two clusters with largest BSS specific frequency are at the central density extremes of our sample: NGC 288 (lowest central density) and M80 (highest). This evidence together with the comparison with theoretical collisional models suggests that both stellar interactions in high density cluster cores and at least one other alternate channel operating low density GGCs play an important role in the production of BSS. We also note a possible connection between HB morphology and blue straggler luminosity functions in these six clusters.	astro-ph	astro-ph	Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Blue Straggler Stars: a direct comparison of Star counts and population ratios in six Galactic Globular Clusters1 Francesco R. Ferraro2, Alison Sills3, Robert T. Rood4, Barbara Paltrinieri5, Roberto Buonanno5,6 ABSTRACT The central regions of six Galactic Globular Clusters (GGCs) (M3, M80, M10, M13, M92 and NGC 288) have been imaged using HST-WFPC2 and the ultra- violet (UV) filters (F255W, F336W). The selected sample covers a large range in both central density (log ρ0) and metallicity ([Fe/H]). In this paper, we present a direct cluster-to-cluster comparison of the Blue Stragglers Stars (BSS) popu- lation as selected from (m255, m255 − m336) Color Magnitude Diagrams (CMDs). We have found: (a) BSS in three of the clusters (M3, M80, M92) are much more concentrated toward the center of the cluster than the red giants; because of the smaller BSS samples for the other clusters we can only note that the BSS radial distributions are consistent with central concentration; (b) the specific frequency of BSS varies greatly from cluster to cluster. The most interesting result is that the two clusters with largest BSS specific frequency are at the central density extremes of our sample: NGC 288 (lowest central density) and M80 (highest). This evidence together with the comparison with theoretical collisional models suggests that both stellar interactions in high density cluster cores and at least one other alternate channel operating low density GGCs play an important role in the production of BSS. We also note a possible connection between HB mor- phology and blue straggler luminosity functions in these six clusters. 2Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit`a di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I -- 40126 Bologna, Italy; fer- [email protected] 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M1, Canada; [email protected] 4Astronomy Dept., University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903-0818, USA; [email protected] 5Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00040 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy 6Universit`a di Roma "Tor Vergata", Dip di Fisica, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, I-00133 Roma, Italy -- 2 -- Subject headings: Globular clusters: NGC 288 ); stars: evolution -- blue stragglers -- binaries: close; individual (M3, M80, M10, M13, M92, 1. Introduction Stellar collisions are thought to be the dominant channels for the formation and evo- lution of various types of unusual stellar objects and binary systems in the dense stellar environments, such as the central regions of Galactic Globular Clusters (GGCs). Among the possible collisionally induced populations, Blue Stragglers Stars (BSS) are surely the most studied. BSS were first discovered by Sandage (1953) in M3. In recent years the realization that BSS are the ideal diagnostic for a quantitative evaluation of the effects of dynamical interactions inside star clusters has led to a remarkable burst of activity in the search for and the systematic study of BSS in clusters. In addition, the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), with its high angular resolution and UV imaging capabilities, has made it possible to search for candidates BSS in the cores of highly concentrated GGCs. Within this framework we are performing an extensive HST-UV survey in the cores of a selected sample of GGCs searching for various products of binary evolution. In particular, we are constructing an homogeneous database of BSS in the UV-bands. Some results have been already published in a series of papers presenting the BSS content in individual clusters (see Ferraro et al. 1997a, 1999a, 2001 and Paltrinieri et al. 1998, Bellazzini et al. 2002, Ferraro, Paltrinieri & Cacciari, 1999, for a review). In this series of papers we empirically demonstrated that UV-CMDs are the most appropriate planes for the study of BSS. In this paper, we present a direct comparison of the BSS content in six intermediate to high density (log ρ0 ∼ 2 -- 5.4) GGCs with intermediate to low metallicity: M13 (NGC 6205), M10 (NGC 6254), M80 (NGC 6093), M3 (NGC 5272), M92(NGC 6341) and NGC 288. In §3 we present the BSS samples discovered in each cluster on the basis of the UV-CMDs, and we discuss the properties and the radial distributions of BSS with respect to normal cluster stars. In §4 we present the comparison of the BSS distribution in the UV-CMDs with that expected from theoretical collisional models. 1Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555 -- 3 -- 2. Observations and data analysis The data-set used in this work consist of a series of HST-WFPC2 exposures covering the central regions of six GGCs: M3, M10, M13, M80, M92 and NGC 288. In Table 1 we summarized the main characteristics of each cluster: metallicity ([Fe/H]) from Zinn & West (1984), central density (ρ0 and mass (from Trager & Meylan 1993), distance (d) (from Ferraro et al. 1999b), and central dispersion velocity (σ0) (from Trager & Meylan 1993). For each cluster, the Planetary Camera (PC) was roughly centered on the cluster center (in the case of NGC 288 the cluster center was outside the field of view of the PC - see Figure 1 by Bellazzini et al. 2002). By adopting this observational strategy a significant fraction of the cluster luminosity has been sampled with a single HST pointing, In Table 3 (column 2) the fraction of the cluster luminosity sampled (LS/LT ) in each cluster is reported. Here we present the results obtained using the mid-UV (F255W) and near-UV (F336W) filters, those best suited for picking out BSS. Table 2 lists the total duration of the exposures in each filter for the six clusters. All the photometric reductions (with the exception of NGC 288; see Bellazzini et al. 2002) have been carried out using ROMAFOT (Buonanno et al. 1983), a package specif- ically developed to perform accurate photometry in crowded fields. The standard procedure described in Ferraro et al. (1997a) was adopted. More details on the reduction procedure and the entire dataset secured in these clusters can be found in some specific papers already published (see for example Ferraro et al. 1997a for M3 and Ferraro et al. 1999a for M80). Briefly, the images in the same filter were aligned and combined in order to obtain a median image in each filter. We used the combined F255W image as reference frame for searching the objects in each field. Then the PSF fitting procedure was separately performed on each individual frame, and an average magnitude was computed for each star. The instrumental magnitudes were finally transformed into the STMAG system, using Table 9 of Holtzmann et al. (1995). 3. Results In the UV cluster light is dominated by hot stars, specifically the blue HB stars and the BSS. (see for example Figure 1 by Ferraro, Paltrinieri & Cacciari 1999). Since the BSS are one of the hottest sub-populations in the cluster, they are easily separated from the cooler Turn-Off and SGB stars. Indeed, in previous papers (Ferraro et al. 1997a, 1999a, 2001 and Paltrinieri et al. 1998, Ferraro, Paltrinieri & Cacciari, 1999) we have shown that UV-CMDs, in particular the (m255, m255 − m336) plane, are ideal for selecting BSS. -- 4 -- Figure 1 shows the (m255, m255 − m336) CMDs for the six clusters. More than 50,000 stars are plotted in the six panels of Figure 1. As can be seen, in this plane, the BSS populations define a clean and well-defined sequence spanning ∼ 3 mag in m255. Further, they are clearly distinguishable from SGB-TO stars. In order to select the BSS samples we followed the same criteria that we adopted for M3. In Ferraro et al. (1997a), the global population of BSS was divided in two sub-samples: (a) bright BSS with m255 < 19 and (b) faint BSS with 19.0 < m255 < 19.4. To apply the same criteria to the other clusters shown in Figure 1, the CMD of each cluster has been shifted to match that of M3 by using the brightest portion of the HB as the normalization region. Figure 1 shows the UV-CMD after the alignment. Thus, the solid horizontal line (at m255 = 19) in the figure shows the cut-off magnitude for the bBSS sample. In this paper we are comparing the BSS content in clusters with quite different structural parameters. The level of difficulty in the detecting and the measuring of (especially faint) BSS varies from cluster to cluster. Thus, we decided to compare the samples by using only the bright BSS samples (hereafter bBSS). The number of bright BSS (NbBSS) identified in each cluster is listed in Table 3. 3.1. bBSS radial distribution As pointed out by many authors most BSS in GGCs are found to be centrally concen- trated with respect to normal stars. Since the central relaxation time in these systems is much less than the cluster age, this result is generally ascribed to dynamical mass segrega- tion and can be interpreted as an evidence that BSS are more massive than the comparison stars. We have determined the radial distributions of the bBSS of the six GGCs using the RGB stars (from the tip down to the SGB ) as a "reference" population. The RGB stars have been selected in the (m555, m336 − m555) CMD, i.e. roughly a (V, U − V ) CMD in order to reduce any bias which might be introduced by the poor photometry for the very red stars in the UV bands. The cumulative radial distributions for the bBSS and the RGB stars are plotted in Figure 2 as a function of the projected distance (r) from the cluster center. It is evident from the plots that the BSS (solid line) are significantly more centrally concentrated than RGB stars (dotted line) in M3, M92 and M80. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test has been applied to the two distributions, in each cluster, to check the statistical significance of the detected differences. The test yields the probability that the bBSS population and the RGB stars are extracted from the same parent distribution. The probability values obtained in each cluster are reported in Figure 2. The effect is strongly statistically significant in the case of M3, M92 and M80. For NGC 288 and M10 the BSS are more concentrated that the -- 5 -- RGB but the results are significant at only roughly the 2σ and 1σ levels respectively. At first glance the radial distribution of the BSS in M13 appears to be indistinguishable from the other cluster stars. Since it is difficult to imagine any BSS formation scenario in which the BSS are not at least somewhat centrally condensed, we have more carefully examined the role of the small M13 bBSS sample. A series of Monte Carlo simulations have been performed in which 103 subsamples of the same number of the bBSS population found in M13 (16) have been randomly extracted from the M3 bBSS population (72). Then, the radial distribution of each subsample was compared with that of the RGB stars of M3. A KS test has been applied to quantify the significance of the differences. In these simulations drawn from a sample in which the central concentration of the BSS has been convinvingly shown, 40% of the M13-like samples have p > 20% that the BSS and RGB have the same distribution. Less than 10% have as a convincing a case for different distributions as in M3. About 6% of the M13-like samples have p as large as for the true M13 comparison. In another test, two M13 BSS were arbitrary moved from the middle of the distribution to the inner part and p dropped from 0.77 to 0.34. We conclude that the M13 bBSS sample is too small to make a definitive statement about its central concentration. Our M13 results are consistent with no central concentration, but they are not inconsistent with a central concentration even as large as that of M3. The case of NGC 288 deserves a short comment since the location of the center in this cluster is quite uncertain. The radial distribution plotted above could be affected by large uncertanties. In accordance with Bellazzini et al. (2002) we adopted the coordinates listed by Webbink (1985), and the cluster center turns out to be located just outside the field-of-view of the PC (see their Figure 1). 1/2 ). Values for rBSS We can make an additional quantitative comparison by using the parameters rBSS 1/2 (the radius containing half the bBSS sample) and fRGB(the fraction of the total RGB sample 1/2 and fRGB are listed in Table 3 along with the core contained within rBSS radius (rc). With the exception of NGC 288 (for which we took the value from Trager, Djorgovski & King, 1993), the rc was independently determined in each cluster by fitting a King model to the observed density profile (see for example Figure 4 in Ferraro et al. 1999a). These values confirm the general impression from Figure 2,that the BSS are much more concentrated than the RGB in M80, M3 and M92. Thus, even considering the brightest part of the BSS distribution in M80, we have fully confirmed the previous results by Ferraro et al. 1999a, who suggested that the BSS in M80 are the most concentrated population observed in a GGCs. In Figure 3 the magnitude distributions (equivalent to a luminosity function -- LF) of bBSS for the six clusters are compared. In doing this we use the parameter δm255 defined -- 6 -- as the magnitude of each bBSS (after the alignment showed in Figure 1) with respect to the magnitude threshold (assumed at m255 = 19 - see Figure 1). Then δm255 = mbBSS 255 − 19.0. From the comparison shown in Figure 3 (panel(a)) the bBSS magnitude distributions for M3 and M92 appear to be quite similar and both significantly different from those obtained in the other clusters. This is essentially because in both these two clusters the bBSS magnitude distribution seems to have a tail extending to brighter magnitudes (the bBSS magnitude tip reaches δm255 ∼ −2.5). A KS test applied to these two distributions yields a probability of 93% that they are extracted from the same distribution. In panel(b) we see that the bBSS magnitude distribution of M13, M10 and M80 are essentially indistinguishable from each other and significantly different from M3 and M92. A KS test applied to the three LFs confirms that they are extracted from the same parent distribution. Moreover, a KS test applied to the total LFs obtained by combining the data for the two groups: M3 and M92 (group(a)), and M13, M80 and M10 (group(b)) shows that the the bBSS-LFs of group(a) and group(b) are not compatible (at 3σ level). It is interesting to note that the clusters grouped on the basis of bBSS-LFs have some similarities in their HB morphology. The three clusters of group(b) have an extended HB blue tail; the two clusters of group(a) have no HB extention. Could there be a connection between the bBSS photometric properties and the HB morphology? This possibility needs to be further investigated. Finally we note that the magnitude function for the bBSS in NGC 288 (solid line in panel (b)) is significantly different than that of all the other clusters. 3.2. Specific Frequency In order to properly compare the BSS populations in different clusters, the BSS number must be normalized to account for the size of the total cluster population. For this reason we have defined various specific frequencies. In Ferraro, Fusi Pecci & Bellazzini (1995) we used S4BSS (the BSS number normalized to the integrated bolometric luminosity of the surveyed region in units of 104L⊙). Analogously, in Ferraro et al. (1999a) we defined a more appropriate specific frequency: F BSS HB = NBSS NHB where NBSS is the number of BSS and NHB is the number of HB stars in the same area. The two ratios are similar, since in absence of any special segregation of HB stars with respect -- 7 -- to the "normal" cluster-star, the observed number of HB stars NHB is an excellent indicator of the sampled cluster luminosity. In fact, the simple relation by Renzini & Buzzoni (1986): Nj = B(t)LStj easily links the number of stars sampled in any post main sequence stage (Nj) with the sam- pled cluster luminosity (LS) and the duration of the phase (tj). B(t) is the specific flux of the population. Following Renzini & Buzzoni (1986) we assume B(t) ∼ 2 × 10−11 stars L−1 ⊙ yr−1 for an old population of 1010 yr. Thus, assuming tHB ∼ 108 yr, we can expect to sample 2 × 10−3 HB stars for each solar luminosity sampled in a given stellar population. The F BSS HB ratio has the advantage that it is a purely observative quantity and it can be easily computed in the UV-CMDs since the HB population is quite bright in these planes and the HB sequence is well separated from the other branches. However, while in the following discussion we will mainly use the F BSS HB ratio, the S4BSS is also computed for each cluster and the values are listed in Table 3 for sake of comparison. HB HB are listed in Table 3. As can be seen F bBSS As discussed in Section 3 we consider only the bright BSS, hence NbBSS is the number of bright bBSS (according to the original definition by Ferraro et al. (1997a)). The values of F bBSS varies by a factor 13 from M13 to NGC 288. Interesting enough NGC 288, the cluster with the lowest central density, shows the largest bBSS specific frequency. As already noted by Bellazzini et al. (2002) this cluster turns out to have as many bBSS as HB stars over the sampled area. Though the number of bBSS detected in the cluster is intrinsically small (∼ 30) the result is surprising: F bBSS is comparable with what found in the central region of the core-collapsing cluster M80 by Ferraro et al. (1999a). If we consider only the PC field of view, the F bBSS in M80 rises up to 0.7. HB HB The central density of a cluster is not the only factor which determines the number of collision products we expect to see. Collisions involving binary star systems are more likely than collisions between single stars and have a significant probability of producing a stellar merger. We used equation 14 from Leonard (1989) in order to estimate the number of binary-binary (bb) encounters occuring per Gyr (Nbb) in the core of each cluster listed in Table 1. Adopting the distance modulus listed in Table 1, the rc listed in Table 3, σ0 and the central density Log(ρ0) listed in Table 1 (from Pryor & Meylan (1993)), assuming an average mass of 0.2M⊙ (Kroupa 2001), we computed tbb (the mean interval between collisions) from equation (14) by Leonard (1989) and derived the expected number of encounters, per Gyr, as a function of the binary fraction (fb) in the core. -- 8 -- In doing this, the semimajor axis which separates hard from soft binaries (ahs) has been computed for each cluster according to the following relation: ahs = GM 9σ2 0 derived by combining equation 4 of Leonard & Linnell (1992) with the Kepler's third law. The semimajor axes computed for each cluster and expressed in AU are listed in Table 4. Following Leonard (1989) we multiplied tbb by a factor of two in order to take into account the fact that not all encounters lead to a physical collision. The rate of single-binary collisions can also be estimated from Leonard's results. In his equation 8 if one assumes that the pericenter distance is proportional to binary semimajor axis, like in binary-binary collisions, and that M1 = M⋆, M2(binary) = 1.5 M⋆, one finds a factor of 5 instead of his 6 in the cross section. Thus the number of single-binary encounters is roughly the 5/6 the number of binary-binary encounters. In Table 4 we list the results with three different fb values, respectively 0.2 and 1.00. These values should be considered as indications of the effectiveness of physical collisions in the cluster cores. It is clear that the bb (or sb) collision channel is more than one order of magnitude more efficient in a dense cluster like M80 than in a low density cluster like NGC 288. Therefore, the high specific frequency of blue stragglers in NGC 288 suggests that the binary fraction in NGC 288 is much higher than the binary fraction in M80. Only then would one expect a similar encounter frequency in the two clusters. Note that a cluster like M80 may have originally had a higher binary fraction but because of the efficiency of encounters, those primordial binaries were "used up" early in the history of the cluster, producing some collisional BSS which have evolved away from the MS (see for example the evolved E-BSS population found in M3 and M80 by Ferraro 1997a, 1999a). We should note that on the basis of the simulation results shown in Figure 8 and in Table 4 the binary-binary channel can still account for the number of the BSS observed in NGC288 if a large enough percentage of binary fraction is assumed to reside in the core. However, without invoking ad hoc binary content, a more natural explanation for the origin of BSS in NGC 288 (as discussed in Bellazzini et al. (2002)) is the mass transfer process in primordial binary systems (Carney et al 2001). Here we probably have another confirmation of the scenario suggested by Fusi Pecci et al. (1992, and references therein): BSS living in different environments have different origins. -- 9 -- 4. Collisional Models From our sample of six clusters with rather diverse bBSS populations we can select pairs with similarities in parameters like density, metallicity, velocity dispersion, or we can search for trends in bBSS populations as some parameter varies. There are two quite striking and unsuspected results. First, the two clusters at the high and low density extremes, M80 and NGC 288, have the largest bBSS specific frequencies. Second, two clusters which are in most ways quite similar, M3 and M13, have very different bBSS populations. To aid our understanding of the BSS populations in these clusters, we present a compar- ison of the photometric characteristics of the BSS observed in the selected clusters with some collisional models. The models we used in this paper are described in detail in Sills & Bailyn (1999), and have been applied to 47 Tucanae (Sills et al. 2000). We assume that the blue stragglers in the central regions of the six clusters are all formed through stellar collisions between single stars during an encounter between a single star and a binary system. While binary-binary collisions may well be important, we do not currently have the capability of modeling the BSS they might produce. The trajectories of the stars during the collision are modeled using the STARLAB software package (McMillan & Hut 1996). The masses of the stars involved are chosen randomly from a mass function for the current cluster and a differ- ent mass function which governs the mass distribution within the binary system. A binary fraction, and a distribution of semi-major axes must also be assumed. The output of these simulations is the probability that a collision between stars of specific masses will occur. We have chosen standard values for the mass functions (dN(M) ∝ m−(1+x)dM) and binary distribution. The current mass function has an index x = −2, and the mass distribution within the binary systems are drawn from a Salpeter mass function (x = 1.35). We chose a binary fraction of 20% and a binary period distribution which is flat in log P . The total stel- lar density was taken from the central density of each cluster. The effect of changing these values is explored in Sills & Bailyn (1999). The collision products are modeled by entropy ordering of gas from colliding stars (Sills & Lombardi 1997) and evolved from these initial conditions using the Yale stellar evolution code YREC (Guenther et al. 1992). The models reported here used a metallicity of [Fe/H] = −1.6, which is approximately correct for 4 of the clusters investigated in this paper. BSS populations should not be strongly dependent on metallicity. By weighting the resulting evolutionary tracks by the probability that the specific collision will occur, we obtain a predicted distribution of BSS in the color-magnitude diagram. In order to explore the effects of non-constant BSS formation rates, we considered a series of truncated rates. In these models we assumed that the BSS formation rate was constant for some portion of the cluster lifetime, and zero otherwise. This assumption is -- 10 -- obviously unphysical -- the relevant encounter rates would presumably change smoothly on timescales comparable to the relaxation time. However these models do demonstrate how the distribution of BSS in the color-magnitude diagram depends on when the BSS were created, and thus provide a basis for understanding more complicated and realistic formation rates. 4.1. Comparisons with data Some comparisons between the models and the HST observations are shown in figures 4 -- 8. In figures 4, 5 and 6, we compare our theoretical predictions to the BSS population of M80. The theoretical predictions have been normalized by the total number of predicted blue stragglers for each cluster; this allows us to more easily compare the shapes of the distri- butions. Figure 4 is an example of the predicted distribution of BSS in the m255, m255 −m336 color-magnitude diagram for M80. The theoretical predictions are shown as greyscale con- tours, with the darker colors indicating more BSS in that region of the CMD. The observed blue stragglers are shown as crosses. Each of the panels is a different assumption for the BSS formation rate, as indicated on the top of the panel. The differences between the models can be understood in terms of lifetimes of the individual collision products which make up the distributions. For example, if BSS production stopped 5 Gyr ago (center panel), we predict that there should be no observed bBSS at present because all the massive BSS would have had time to evolve off to the giant branch. At the other extreme, if all the BSS were formed in the last Gyr (panel marked "1 Gyr to now"), only a few of the very brightest (i.e. most massive) would have even started moving towards the subgiant branch. It is worth pointing out that the brightest BSS shown in these predictions are not on the standard zero age main sequence, but begin their lives to the red. These are stars which were formed from the merger of two fairly evolved main sequence stars, and so they do not have enough hydrogen fuel left at their cores after the merger to return to the ZAMS (Sills et al. 1997). Figure 5 gives the luminosity function for each of the model distributions for M80. The data are shown as the solid line, while the dotted line is the theoretical prediction for the formation times shown on the top of each panel. The luminosity functions are good probes of the mass distribution of blue stragglers, since the correlation between mass and luminosity is quite tight. The luminosity functions show, as do the CMD distributions, that bright BSS require recent formation. They also show that the relative numbers of brighter and fainter bBSS is not correct in our models. If we model the fainter bBSS very well (as in the panel marked "stopped 2 Gyr ago"), then our models under-predict the number of blue stragglers between m255 = 17 and 18. Figure 6 gives the equivalent "temperature function" for M80. This is the cumulative -- 11 -- number of stars in each color (i.e. temperature) bin, in direct analogy to the luminosity function. The distribution of blue stragglers in color can be used to study the age or age spread of the BSS. Evolutionary tracks for stars of these masses are confined to a fairly narrow range in luminosity between the main sequence and the base of the giant branch, so the luminosity function does not give the entire picture. The temperature function is useful for distinguishing between populations which have lots of main sequence stars and populations with many subgiants. As in figure 5, the data are shown as the solid line, while the dotted line is the theoretical prediction for the formation times shown on the top of each box. We performed KS tests on the luminosity and temperature functions for each cluster and each theoretical distribution. Figures 7 and 8 gives the best fit model distribution for each cluster, its luminosity function, and its temperature function. We will comment on each cluster individually here, and then draw some general conclusions in the next section. M80: The fainter bBSS are very well fit by a distribution in which formation was trun- cated about 2 Gyr ago. However, there is a significant population of BSS which extends up to 2.5 magnitudes above the turnoff, which is not predicted by such a model and which sug- gests that some BSS formation continues until the present. Ferraro et al. (1999a) suggested that the large BSS population in M80 is due to the stellar interactions which are delaying the core collapse process. Now we add the evidence that many of these BSS are relatively old (t > 2 Gyr). These results together suggest that the process of holding off the core collapse can be rather extended. M10: The BSS in this cluster are fit by different formation models in the temperature and luminosity planes. However, the difference between the KS probability for the best fit to luminosity function (BSS formation ended 2 Gyr ago) and the best fit for temperature function (BSS formation ended 1 Gyr ago) is small. The luminosity function has a 16% probability of being drawn from the first distribution, and a 10% probability of being drawn from the second distribution. M13: Of all the clusters in this paper, this one is the most believable for showing a truncated BSS distribution. There is no evidence for very bright BSSs close to the main sequence. The only BSS brighter than δm255 = 2.5 is very red, consistent with an evolved object. M3: None of the collisional models fit this cluster very well. The best fit for the luminosity function, as shown in figure 8, is a model in which the BSS stopped forming about 1 Gyr ago (3% KS probability). However, the temperature function for the same model has almost zero probability of being drawn from the same distribution as the data, -- 12 -- and the best fit temperature function is the scenario in which the BSS stopped forming 2 Gyr ago. In all cases, including the models which predict BSS formation right up to the present day, we under-predict the number of very bright blue stragglers. M92: The best fit to both the luminosity and temperature functions is a model in which the BSS formation was truncated 1 Gyr ago. However, there are also very bright blue stragglers in this cluster, suggesting that blue straggler formation has continued to the present day or that the blue stragglers produced in this cluster are not well modeled by collisions between two stars. NGC 288: This cluster is significantly different from the previous 5, in that we do not expect that the BSS formed in this cluster are the products of stellar collisions. The density is simply too low. We also know that the binary fraction in the core is measured to be ∼ 10 to 38% (Bellazzini et al. 2002), so BSS formed in this low density cluster should be the result of binary evolution rather than stellar collisions. By assuming that binary merger BSS are similar to collisional BSS we can still expore the BSS formation history in NGC 288. The best fit distribution for this cluster, at the 65% level, is achieved when the BSS were formed at a constant rate over the entire lifetime of the cluster, right up to the present day. This result is significantly different from the other five clusters investigated in this paper. Perhaps, it could be an indication of the different formation histories of binary mergers and collisions. It is also possible that the difference between this cluster and the other 5 could be a result of different evolutionary tracks for binary merger and collision products. 4.2. Indications and Trends The first conclusion that we draw from the models is that since we are limiting our study to BSS brighter than the limit of m255 = 19.0, we have no information about BSS formation earlier than about 5 Gyr ago. On the other hand, we can state with certainty that BSS have been formed in all these clusters during the last 5 Gyr. In all clusters, this formation is not confined to the very recent past; rather, it has lasted over the entire time that we can probe, and in fact seems to be concentrated at earlier epochs. The KS tests on the luminosity and temperature functions give the best results for distributions in which BSS stopped forming 1 -- 2 Gyr ago in all clusters except NGC 288. These "best" fits are clearly not good fits, however. In most of the clusters, there is a population of bright BSS that was formed more recently. Our models consistently under- predict the number of bright BSS compared to the number of fainter, redder BSS. There are a number of possible reasons. -- 13 -- The first, and most likely, discrepancy is in the formation rate of blue stragglers. We have assumed a constant formation rate over the some times, and zero otherwise. If, instead, blue stragglers were formed at some (more or less) constant rate between 5 and 2 Gyr ago, and then experienced a reduced (but not zero) blue straggler formation rate to the present day, the predicted distribution would match the observations better. It is very unlikely that the blue straggler formation rate changes sharply between zero and a constant value. Rather, the formation rate is going to be smoother function of central density, velocity dispersion, single star mass function and the number and nature of binary systems in the cluster. The simple models used in this paper should be taken as indications of formation eras only. It is also possible that the stellar evolutionary models which go into these blue straggler distributions are not accurate. If we were overestimating the lifetimes of the faint blue stragglers or underestimating the lifetimes of the bright blue stragglers, we would see this kind of mismatch between observations and data. It is difficult to understand how the evolutionary tracks would be overestimating the lifetimes of the faint blue stragglers. The lower the mass of the collision product, in general, the more similar it is to a normal star of the same mass, and so its evolutionary track is very much like normal stars -- something we understand quite well. In order to underestimate the lifetimes of the brighter blue stragglers, the collision products would have to mix more hydrogen into their cores than is currently predicted. Rapid rotation is a plausible mechanism for this mixing, although we would have to have some process by which the lower mass BSS were not rotating as rapidly. It is also possible that the bright blue stragglers could actually be the merger of three stars rather than two (as is expected to happen in binary-mediated collisions), and so our evolutionary models will not be applicable. The merger product of three 0.4 M⊙ stars will have a higher percentage of hydrogen in its core than the product of two 0.6 M⊙ stars, but approximately the same mass. The difference between M3 and M92 on one hand, and M10, M13 and M80 on the other is primarily the existence of a few very bright blue stragglers in the first group of clusters. In all 5 clusters, the blue stragglers fainter than about m255 = 18.5 are very well modeled by the same distribution (a truncated formation scenario, suggesting that blue straggler formation rates should be weighted towards 3 -- 5 Gyr ago). The fact that M3 and M92 are better fit by a formation scenario in which BSS formation ended more recently is simply a reflection of the number of very bright BSS in these clusters. These bright blue stragglers could be an indication of continued BSS formation, or of a different binary distribution (which produced more triple collisions). M3 does have a significant population of BSS in the outer part of the cluster which are thought to be the result of binary mergers (Ferraro et al. 1997a). This fact does set M3 apart from M13, M10, & M80, which have few exterior BSS. Unfortunately M92 also has few exterior BSS so they cannot be invoked to explain the M3/M92 similarity. -- 14 -- As noted in Section 3.1, another very interesting point is that M10, M13 and M80 (which share a common BSS Luminosity function) all have blue tail components to their horizontal branches, while M3, M92 and NGC 288 do not. M3 and M13 are also a classic second-parameter pair (see Ferraro et al. 1997c), referring to the difference in their horizontal branch morphology without an obvious difference in any other cluster parameter: they have the same metallicity, central density, total mass, and very similar velocity dispersions. (The two clusters may have slightly different ages, which may or may not affect horizontal branch morphology -- see Rey et al. 2001, Davidge & Courteau 1999, Ferraro et al. 1997c). From these data, there is certainly a suggestion that BSS population could be connected to the second parameter. From the comparisons in this paper, it seems that it is not the total number of BSS or their specific frequency, but rather the kind of BSS which are produced in "blue tail" clusters which is different from those produced in non-blue tail clusters. If this link between BSS and horizontal branch morphology is real, then it suggests that the second parameter could be related to either stellar collisions and encounters, or to binary evolution. 5. Conclusions In this paper, we have compared the blue straggler distribution in six galactic globular clusters: M3, M10, M13, M80, M92 and NGC 288. The blue stragglers were observed in the HST UV filters F255W and F336W. The clusters have similar total masses, and veloc- ity dispersions; have intermediate to low metallicities and span a range in central density. We studied the properties of the blue stragglers relative to other cluster populations; and we compared the observed blue straggler distributions with theoretical models of collision products in globular clusters. Whether they formed via a collisional channel or a merged primoridial binary channel, BSS are the most massive stars in GGCs other than neutron stars or possibly some white dwarfs. Since dynamical relaxation times are typically shorter than BSS lifetimes they should settle toward the cluster center. BSS formed from merged primordial binaries have the entire cluster lifetime to settle. Collisions occur most often in high density regions and most often involve binaries providing yet another reason to expect BSS to be found near cluster centers. Indeed, it is difficult to image a BSS formation scenario which would not lead to a centrally condensed BSS distribution. Our results are consistent with this expectation: M3, M92, & M80 show strong central concentrations; the BSS in M10 and NGC 288 are most likely centrally condensed; while the BSS in M13 could have the same distribution as the RGB, they could also have a central concentration similar to that of M3. The small sample size is not adequate to definitively determine the radial distribution. -- 15 -- The specific frequency of blue stragglers compared to the number of horizontal branch stars varies from 0.07 to 0.92 for these six clusters, and does not seem to be correlated with central density, total mass, velocity dispersion, or any other obvious cluster property. We do not have measurements of the binary fraction in most of these clusters. Binary stars impact the blue straggler populations in a number of ways. BSS can be formed from binary evolution in any environment, although binary systems in dense environments will be different from those in sparse environments -- close binaries will be hardened by encounters (increasing the number of "binary merger" BSS), but wide binaries are also disrupted (decreasing the number of "binary merger" BSS). The relative rates of these events is an important factor in looking at blue stragglers in clusters. Binary systems also facilitate close interactions between stars because they have a large cross section compared to single stars, so we expect that clusters with a large binary fraction to have both more collisional and binary merger blue stragglers. Fusi Pecci et al. (1992, and references therein) presented a qualitative interpretative scenario concerning the possible origin of BSS in GGCs. They suggest that BSS in loose clusters might be produced from coalescence of primordial binaries. In high density GGCs (depending on survival-destruction rate of primordial binaries) BSS might mostly arise from stellar interactions, particularly those which involve binaries (Ferraro, Fusi Pecci & Bellazz- ini, 1995). In this scenario one could find clusters where more than one mechanism is at work in generating BSS. In fact Ferraro et al. (1993, 1997a) found that the radial distribution and the luminosity functions of BSS in the center of M3 are consistent with a collisional origin, while in the outer regions they are consistent with a primordial binary origin. The paucity of BSS in M13 suggests that either the primordial population of binaries in M13 was poor or that most of them were destroyed. Alternatively, as suggested by Ferraro et al. (1997b), the mechanism producing BSS in the central region of M3 is more efficient than M13 because M3 and M13 are in different dynamical evolutionary phases. The evidence shown above suggests that different channels of BSS formation should be at work and/or a large difference in the binary fraction should be present in NGC 288 in order to produce such a large BSS frequency in a cluster with such different structural parameters. Bellazzini et al. (2002) measured the binary fraction in the core of NGC 288 to be between 10% and 38%. Similar measurements for M3, M13, and M80 will be extremely helpful in solving this mystery. According to simple models, BSS formation occured in all clusters over last 5 Gyr at least, and more were formed 2 -- 5 Gyr ago than in the recent past. This result needs to be tested using models of globular cluster evolution in which the feedback between stellar collisions and cluster evolution is modeled explicitly. Our assumption of a BSS formation rate which is either constant or zero is unphysical, and more complicated models are clearly -- 16 -- required. Finally, we note the possible connection between horizontal branch morphology and blue straggler population characteristics. Of our six clusters, three have HB blue tails (M10, M13, M80), and three do not. The three with blue tails have the same blue straggler luminosity function, which spans about 1.5 magnitudes compared to 2.5 magnitudes in M3 and M92. This suggests that blue straggler populations and the horizontal branch second parameter may be linked in some way, perhaps through the complicated world of binary systems and their effect on cluster evolution and populations. We warmly thank Michele Bellazzini for useful discussions and the referee, Peter Leonard, for the many helpful suggestions which significantly improved the presentation of the pa- per. The financial support of the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) and of the Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universit`a e della Ricerca (MIUR) is kindly acknowledged. RTR is par- tially supported by grant GO-8709 from STScI. Bailyn, C.D. 1995, ARA&A, 33, 133 REFERENCES Bellazzini, M., Fusi Pecci, F., Messineo, M., Monaco, L., Rood, R.T. 2002, AJ, 123, 1509 Buonanno, R., Buscema, G., Corsi, C.E., Ferraro, I., & Iannicola, G. 1983, A&A, 126, 278 Carney, B.W., Latham, D.W., Laird, J.B., Grant, C.E., & Morse, J.A. 2001, AJ, 122, 3419 Castellani, M., & Castellani, V.,1993, ApJ 407, 649 Cool, A.M., Grindlay, J.E., Cohn, H.N., Lugger, P.J., & Slavin, S.D. 1995, ApJ, 439, 695 Cool, A.M., Grindlay, J.E., Cohn, H.N., Lugger, P.J., & Bailyn, C.D. 1998, ApJ, 492, L75 De Marchi, G., Paresce, F., Ferraro, F.R. 1993, ApJSS, 85, 293 (DPF93) Djorgovski, S., Meylan, G., 1993, in Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters, ed. S. G. Djorgovski & G. Meylan (ASP: San Francisco), 325 Ferraro, F.R., Fusi Pecci, F. & Bellazzini, M., 1995, A&A, 294, 80. Ferraro, F.R.,Paltrinieri, B., Fusi Pecci, F., Cacciari, C., Dorman, B., Rood, R.T., Buonanno, R., Corsi, C.E., Burgarella, D., Laget, M. 1997a, A&A, 324, 915 -- 17 -- Ferraro, F.R., Paltrinieri, B., Fusi Pecci, F., Dorman, B., & Rood, R.T. 1997b, MNRAS, 292, L45 Ferraro, F.R., Paltrinieri, B., Fusi Pecci, F., Cacciari, C., Dorman, B., Rood, R. T. 1997c, ApJ, 484, L145. Ferraro, F.R., Paltrinieri, B., Fusi Pecci, F., Rood, R.T., & Dorman, B. 1998, in Ultra- violet Astrophysics -- Beyond the IUE Final Archive, eds. R. Gonz´alez-Riestra, W. Wamsteker, & R. A. Harris (ESA: Noordwijk), 561 Ferraro, F.R., Paltrinieri, B., Rood, R.T., Dorman, B., 1999a, ApJ, 522, 983 Ferraro, F.R., Messineo, M., Fusi Pecci, F., De Palo, A., Straniero, O., Chieffi, A., Limongi, M. 1999b, AJ, 118, 1738 Ferraro, F.R., Paltrinieri, B., Cacciari, C. 1999, Mem SAIt, 70, 599 Ferraro, F.R., Paltrinieri, B., Rood, R.T., Fusi Pecci, F., Buonanno, R. 2000a, ApJ, 537, 312 Ferraro, F.R., Paltrinieri, B., Paresce, F., De Marchi, G. 2000b, ApJ 542, L29 Ferraro, F.R., D'Amico, N., Possenti, A., Mignani, R.P., Paltrinieri, B. 2001, ApJ, 561, 337 Fusi Pecci, F., Ferraro, F.R., Corsi, C.E., Cacciari, C., & Buonanno, R. 1992, AJ, 104, 1831 Holtzmann, J.A., Burrows, C.J., Casertano, S., Hester, J.J., Trauger, J.T., Watson, A.M., & Worthey, G. 1995, PASP, 107, 1065 Guenther, D. B., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 1992 ApJ, 387, 372 Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 Leonard, P.J.T. 1989, AJ, 98, 217 Leonard, P.J.T., Linnell, A.P. 1992, AJ, 103, 1928 McMillan, S. L. W., & Hut,P. 1996, ApJ, 467, 348 Paltrinieri, B., Ferraro, F.R., Fusi Pecci, F., Rood, R.T., Dorman, B. 1998, in Ultra- violet Astrophysics -- Beyond the IUE Final Archive, eds. R. Gonz´alez-Riestra, W. Wamsteker, & R. A. Harris (ESA: Noordwijk), 565 Paresce, F., et al. 1991, Nature, 352, 297 (P91) -- 18 -- Pryor, C., & Meylan, G. 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 50, Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters, ed., S.G. Djorgovski & G. Meylan, (San Francisco: ASP), 357 Renzini, A., Buzzoni, A. 1986 in Spectral Evolution of Galaxies, C. Chiosi& A. Renzini (eds), Dordrecht: Reidel, p.135. Sills, A. & Lombardi, J. C., Jr. 1997, ApJ, 489, L51 Sills, A., & Bailyn, C. D. 1999, ApJ, 513, 428 Sills, A., Bailyn, C. D., Edmonds, P. D., Gilliland, R. L. 2000, ApJ, 535, 298 Trager, S.C., Djorgovski, S.G., & King, I.R. 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 50, Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters, ed., S.G. Djorgovski & G. Meylan, (San Francisco: ASP), 347 Webbink, R. 1985, in IAU Symp. 113, Dynamics of Star Clusters, ed. J. Goodman & P. Hut (Dordrecht:Reidel), 541 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0. -- 19 -- Fig. 1. -- (m255, m255 − m336) CMDs for the selected clusters. Horizontal and vertical shifts have been applied to all CMDs in order to match the main sequences of M3. The horizontal solid line corresponds to m255 = 19 in M3. The bright BSS candidates are marked as large empty circles. -- 20 -- Fig. 2. -- Cumulative radial distributions for the bright BSS (solid line) with respect to the RGB stars (dashed line) as a function of their projected distance (r) from the cluster center for each of the six clusters. The probability that the two populations are extracted from the same distribution is also reported in each panel. -- 21 -- Fig. 3. -- Cumulative magnitude distributions for the bright BSS for each of the six clusters. The δm255 parameter is the difference in magnitude with respect to the limit threashold (m255 = 19) for bright-BSS, see text. In Panel (a) the BSS distributions for M3 and M92 (the two clusters for which the BSS distribution extends up to more than two magnitudes brighter than the threashold) are compared. In Panel (b) the BSS magnitude distributions for the other 4 clusters are plotted. -- 22 -- Fig. 4. -- The distribution of bright blue stragglers in the color-magnitude diagram for M80, compared to theoretical distributions. The observations are plotted as crosses, and the greyscale contours give the theoretical distributions, with darker colors indicating more blue stragglers. The different panels correspond to different eras of constant blue straggler formation, as indicated at the top of each panel. -- 23 -- Fig. 5. -- Luminosity functions for the bright blue stragglers in M80 (solid line), compared to theoretical predictions (dotted line). The different panels correspond to different eras of constant blue straggler formation, as indicated at the top of each panel. The luminosity functions are good probes of the mass function of blue stragglers. This figure shows that the theoretical models do not accurately model the relative numbers of fainter and brighter blue stragglers. -- 24 -- Fig. 6. -- Temperature functions for the bright blue stragglers in M80 (solid line), compared to theoretical predictions (dotted line). The different panels correspond to different eras of constant blue straggler formation, as indicated at the top of each panel. The temperature functions are good probes of the bulk evolutionary state of the population of blue straggler stars, indicating whether the stars are all on the main sequence (as in the panel marked "1 Gyr to now") or closer to the subgiant & giant branches (as in the panel marked "stopped 2 Gyr ago"). The BSS in M80 show a significant spread in evolutionary state. -- 25 -- Fig. 7. -- The observed blue stragglers (crosses in the CMD, solid lines in the luminosity and temperature functions) and the best fit theoretical distribution, as determined from KS tests on the luminosity and temperature functions. This figure shows the results for M80, M10 and M13. In all cases, the nominal best-fit distribution is one in which the blue stragglers stopped forming 2 Gyr ago. However, only for M13 is this actually plausible. M80, and to a lesser extent M10 were forming blue stragglers more recently than 2 Gyr ago, since we see a population of BSS brighter than m255 = 18. On the other hand, the temperature function (i.e. the distribution of BSS in evolutionary state) is very well fit by this truncated -- 26 -- Fig. 8. -- Same as figure 7, for M3, M92 and NGC 288. M3 and M92 contain the brightest blue stragglers in our sample, and so the best-fit theoretical distribution is one in which young blue stragglers (up to 1 Gyr old) are found. However, because of the spread in temperature, these clusters are best fit by a truncated blue straggler formation model, like M80, M10 and M13. NGC 288 is different from the previous 5 clusters -- its blue straggler distribution is extremely well fit by a model which has had essentially constant blue straggler formation over the lifetime of the cluster right to the present day. -- 27 -- Table 1. Cluster parameters Cluster [Fe/H] Logρ0 Mass [M⊙ pc−3] [Log(M/M⊙)] NGC 5272(M3) −1.66 NGC 6205(M13) −1.65 NGC 6093(M80) −1.64 NGC 6254(M10) −1.60 −1.40 NGC6341 (M92) −2.24 NGC 288 3.5 3.4 5.4 3.8 2.1 4.4 5.8 5.8 6.0 5.4 4.9 5.3 d [kpc] 10.1 7.7 9.8 4.7 8.8 9.0 σ0 [km s−1] 5.6 7.1 12.4 5.6 2.9 5.9 Table 2. WFPC2 exposure times Cluster F336W-Exp [s] F255W-Exp [s] M3 M13 M80 M10 NGC 288 M92 3340 560 2400 1500 3760 3800 1200 200 1160 5200 700 2200 Table 3. Bright BSS populations and distributions Cluster LS/LT NbBSS S4BSS F bBSS HB rBSS 1/2 rc rBSS 1/2 /rc fRGB M3 M13 M80 M10 NGC 288 M92 0.25 0.27 0.48 0.30 0.20 0.45 72 16 129 22 24 53 6.0 1.6 13.4 5.6 21.8 4.8 0.28 0.07 0.44 0.27 0.92 0.33 22′′ 46′′ 7′′ 34′′ 60′′ 15′′ 30′′ 40′′ 6.5′′ 40′′ 85′′ 14′′ 0.73 1.15 1.07 0.85 0.71 1.07 0.31 0.47 0.17 0.35 0.38 0.29 -- 28 -- Table 4. Expected number of binary-binary encounters per Gyr Cluster ahs(AU) Nbb(fb = 0.2) Nbb(fb = 1) M3 M13 M80 M10 NGC 288 M92 0.63 0.39 0.13 0.63 2.36 0.57 12 4 66 12 2 47 304 99 1640 289 52 1178

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.