Chapter
stringclasses
18 values
sentence_range
stringlengths
3
9
Text
stringlengths
7
7.34k
1
1190-1193
(iii) Electrostatic field lines start at positive charges and end at negative charges —they cannot form closed loops 11 An electric dipole is a pair of equal and opposite charges q and –q separated by some distance 2a Its dipole moment vector p has magnitude 2qa and is in the direction of the dipole axis from –q to q
1
1191-1194
11 An electric dipole is a pair of equal and opposite charges q and –q separated by some distance 2a Its dipole moment vector p has magnitude 2qa and is in the direction of the dipole axis from –q to q Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 39 12
1
1192-1195
An electric dipole is a pair of equal and opposite charges q and –q separated by some distance 2a Its dipole moment vector p has magnitude 2qa and is in the direction of the dipole axis from –q to q Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 39 12 Field of an electric dipole in its equatorial plane (i
1
1193-1196
Its dipole moment vector p has magnitude 2qa and is in the direction of the dipole axis from –q to q Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 39 12 Field of an electric dipole in its equatorial plane (i e
1
1194-1197
Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 39 12 Field of an electric dipole in its equatorial plane (i e , the plane perpendicular to its axis and passing through its centre) at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 3/2 1 4 ( ) o a r ε − = π + p E 3 , 4 o for r a −εr ≅ >> π p Dipole electric field on the axis at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 2 0 2 4 ( ) r r a ε = π p− E 3 0 42 for r a εr ≅ >> π p The 1/r3 dependence of dipole electric fields should be noted in contrast to the 1/r 2 dependence of electric field due to a point charge
1
1195-1198
Field of an electric dipole in its equatorial plane (i e , the plane perpendicular to its axis and passing through its centre) at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 3/2 1 4 ( ) o a r ε − = π + p E 3 , 4 o for r a −εr ≅ >> π p Dipole electric field on the axis at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 2 0 2 4 ( ) r r a ε = π p− E 3 0 42 for r a εr ≅ >> π p The 1/r3 dependence of dipole electric fields should be noted in contrast to the 1/r 2 dependence of electric field due to a point charge 13
1
1196-1199
e , the plane perpendicular to its axis and passing through its centre) at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 3/2 1 4 ( ) o a r ε − = π + p E 3 , 4 o for r a −εr ≅ >> π p Dipole electric field on the axis at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 2 0 2 4 ( ) r r a ε = π p− E 3 0 42 for r a εr ≅ >> π p The 1/r3 dependence of dipole electric fields should be noted in contrast to the 1/r 2 dependence of electric field due to a point charge 13 In a uniform electric field E, a dipole experiences a torque τ given by τ = p × E but experiences no net force
1
1197-1200
, the plane perpendicular to its axis and passing through its centre) at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 3/2 1 4 ( ) o a r ε − = π + p E 3 , 4 o for r a −εr ≅ >> π p Dipole electric field on the axis at a distance r from the centre: 2 2 2 0 2 4 ( ) r r a ε = π p− E 3 0 42 for r a εr ≅ >> π p The 1/r3 dependence of dipole electric fields should be noted in contrast to the 1/r 2 dependence of electric field due to a point charge 13 In a uniform electric field E, a dipole experiences a torque τ given by τ = p × E but experiences no net force 14
1
1198-1201
13 In a uniform electric field E, a dipole experiences a torque τ given by τ = p × E but experiences no net force 14 The flux Df of electric field E through a small area element DS is given by Df = E
1
1199-1202
In a uniform electric field E, a dipole experiences a torque τ given by τ = p × E but experiences no net force 14 The flux Df of electric field E through a small area element DS is given by Df = E DS The vector area element DS is DS = DS ˆn where DS is the magnitude of the area element and ˆn is normal to the area element, which can be considered planar for sufficiently small DS
1
1200-1203
14 The flux Df of electric field E through a small area element DS is given by Df = E DS The vector area element DS is DS = DS ˆn where DS is the magnitude of the area element and ˆn is normal to the area element, which can be considered planar for sufficiently small DS For an area element of a closed surface, ˆn is taken to be the direction of outward normal, by convention
1
1201-1204
The flux Df of electric field E through a small area element DS is given by Df = E DS The vector area element DS is DS = DS ˆn where DS is the magnitude of the area element and ˆn is normal to the area element, which can be considered planar for sufficiently small DS For an area element of a closed surface, ˆn is taken to be the direction of outward normal, by convention 15
1
1202-1205
DS The vector area element DS is DS = DS ˆn where DS is the magnitude of the area element and ˆn is normal to the area element, which can be considered planar for sufficiently small DS For an area element of a closed surface, ˆn is taken to be the direction of outward normal, by convention 15 Gauss’s law: The flux of electric field through any closed surface S is 1/e0 times the total charge enclosed by S
1
1203-1206
For an area element of a closed surface, ˆn is taken to be the direction of outward normal, by convention 15 Gauss’s law: The flux of electric field through any closed surface S is 1/e0 times the total charge enclosed by S The law is especially useful in determining electric field E, when the source distribution has simple symmetry: (i) Thin infinitely long straight wire of uniform linear charge density l 0 ˆ 2 r ελ = π E n where r is the perpendicular distance of the point from the wire and ˆn is the radial unit vector in the plane normal to the wire passing through the point
1
1204-1207
15 Gauss’s law: The flux of electric field through any closed surface S is 1/e0 times the total charge enclosed by S The law is especially useful in determining electric field E, when the source distribution has simple symmetry: (i) Thin infinitely long straight wire of uniform linear charge density l 0 ˆ 2 r ελ = π E n where r is the perpendicular distance of the point from the wire and ˆn is the radial unit vector in the plane normal to the wire passing through the point (ii) Infinite thin plane sheet of uniform surface charge density s 0 ˆ 2 σ ε E= n where ˆn is a unit vector normal to the plane, outward on either side
1
1205-1208
Gauss’s law: The flux of electric field through any closed surface S is 1/e0 times the total charge enclosed by S The law is especially useful in determining electric field E, when the source distribution has simple symmetry: (i) Thin infinitely long straight wire of uniform linear charge density l 0 ˆ 2 r ελ = π E n where r is the perpendicular distance of the point from the wire and ˆn is the radial unit vector in the plane normal to the wire passing through the point (ii) Infinite thin plane sheet of uniform surface charge density s 0 ˆ 2 σ ε E= n where ˆn is a unit vector normal to the plane, outward on either side Rationalised 2023-24 40 Physics (iii) Thin spherical shell of uniform surface charge density s 2 0 ˆ ( ) 4 q r R r ε = ≥ π E r E = 0 (r < R) where r is the distance of the point from the centre of the shell and R the radius of the shell
1
1206-1209
The law is especially useful in determining electric field E, when the source distribution has simple symmetry: (i) Thin infinitely long straight wire of uniform linear charge density l 0 ˆ 2 r ελ = π E n where r is the perpendicular distance of the point from the wire and ˆn is the radial unit vector in the plane normal to the wire passing through the point (ii) Infinite thin plane sheet of uniform surface charge density s 0 ˆ 2 σ ε E= n where ˆn is a unit vector normal to the plane, outward on either side Rationalised 2023-24 40 Physics (iii) Thin spherical shell of uniform surface charge density s 2 0 ˆ ( ) 4 q r R r ε = ≥ π E r E = 0 (r < R) where r is the distance of the point from the centre of the shell and R the radius of the shell q is the total charge of the shell: q = 4pR2s
1
1207-1210
(ii) Infinite thin plane sheet of uniform surface charge density s 0 ˆ 2 σ ε E= n where ˆn is a unit vector normal to the plane, outward on either side Rationalised 2023-24 40 Physics (iii) Thin spherical shell of uniform surface charge density s 2 0 ˆ ( ) 4 q r R r ε = ≥ π E r E = 0 (r < R) where r is the distance of the point from the centre of the shell and R the radius of the shell q is the total charge of the shell: q = 4pR2s The electric field outside the shell is as though the total charge is concentrated at the centre
1
1208-1211
Rationalised 2023-24 40 Physics (iii) Thin spherical shell of uniform surface charge density s 2 0 ˆ ( ) 4 q r R r ε = ≥ π E r E = 0 (r < R) where r is the distance of the point from the centre of the shell and R the radius of the shell q is the total charge of the shell: q = 4pR2s The electric field outside the shell is as though the total charge is concentrated at the centre The same result is true for a solid sphere of uniform volume charge density
1
1209-1212
q is the total charge of the shell: q = 4pR2s The electric field outside the shell is as though the total charge is concentrated at the centre The same result is true for a solid sphere of uniform volume charge density The field is zero at all points inside the shell
1
1210-1213
The electric field outside the shell is as though the total charge is concentrated at the centre The same result is true for a solid sphere of uniform volume charge density The field is zero at all points inside the shell Physical quantity Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Vector area element D S [L2] m2 DS = DS ˆn Electric field E [MLT–3A–1] V m–1 Electric flux f [ML3 T–3A–1] V m Df = E
1
1211-1214
The same result is true for a solid sphere of uniform volume charge density The field is zero at all points inside the shell Physical quantity Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Vector area element D S [L2] m2 DS = DS ˆn Electric field E [MLT–3A–1] V m–1 Electric flux f [ML3 T–3A–1] V m Df = E DS Dipole moment p [LTA] C m Vector directed from negative to positive charge Charge density: linear l [L–1 TA] C m–1 Charge/length surface s [L–2 TA] C m–2 Charge/area volume r [L–3 TA] C m–3 Charge/volume POINTS TO PONDER 1
1
1212-1215
The field is zero at all points inside the shell Physical quantity Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Vector area element D S [L2] m2 DS = DS ˆn Electric field E [MLT–3A–1] V m–1 Electric flux f [ML3 T–3A–1] V m Df = E DS Dipole moment p [LTA] C m Vector directed from negative to positive charge Charge density: linear l [L–1 TA] C m–1 Charge/length surface s [L–2 TA] C m–2 Charge/area volume r [L–3 TA] C m–3 Charge/volume POINTS TO PONDER 1 You might wonder why the protons, all carrying positive charges, are compactly residing inside the nucleus
1
1213-1216
Physical quantity Symbol Dimensions Unit Remarks Vector area element D S [L2] m2 DS = DS ˆn Electric field E [MLT–3A–1] V m–1 Electric flux f [ML3 T–3A–1] V m Df = E DS Dipole moment p [LTA] C m Vector directed from negative to positive charge Charge density: linear l [L–1 TA] C m–1 Charge/length surface s [L–2 TA] C m–2 Charge/area volume r [L–3 TA] C m–3 Charge/volume POINTS TO PONDER 1 You might wonder why the protons, all carrying positive charges, are compactly residing inside the nucleus Why do they not fly away
1
1214-1217
DS Dipole moment p [LTA] C m Vector directed from negative to positive charge Charge density: linear l [L–1 TA] C m–1 Charge/length surface s [L–2 TA] C m–2 Charge/area volume r [L–3 TA] C m–3 Charge/volume POINTS TO PONDER 1 You might wonder why the protons, all carrying positive charges, are compactly residing inside the nucleus Why do they not fly away You will learn that there is a third kind of a fundamental force, called the strong force which holds them together
1
1215-1218
You might wonder why the protons, all carrying positive charges, are compactly residing inside the nucleus Why do they not fly away You will learn that there is a third kind of a fundamental force, called the strong force which holds them together The range of distance where this force is effective is, however, very small ~10-14 m
1
1216-1219
Why do they not fly away You will learn that there is a third kind of a fundamental force, called the strong force which holds them together The range of distance where this force is effective is, however, very small ~10-14 m This is precisely the size of the nucleus
1
1217-1220
You will learn that there is a third kind of a fundamental force, called the strong force which holds them together The range of distance where this force is effective is, however, very small ~10-14 m This is precisely the size of the nucleus Also the electrons are not allowed to sit on top of the protons, i
1
1218-1221
The range of distance where this force is effective is, however, very small ~10-14 m This is precisely the size of the nucleus Also the electrons are not allowed to sit on top of the protons, i e
1
1219-1222
This is precisely the size of the nucleus Also the electrons are not allowed to sit on top of the protons, i e inside the nucleus, due to the laws of quantum mechanics
1
1220-1223
Also the electrons are not allowed to sit on top of the protons, i e inside the nucleus, due to the laws of quantum mechanics This gives the atoms their structure as they exist in nature
1
1221-1224
e inside the nucleus, due to the laws of quantum mechanics This gives the atoms their structure as they exist in nature 2
1
1222-1225
inside the nucleus, due to the laws of quantum mechanics This gives the atoms their structure as they exist in nature 2 Coulomb force and gravitational force follow the same inverse-square law
1
1223-1226
This gives the atoms their structure as they exist in nature 2 Coulomb force and gravitational force follow the same inverse-square law But gravitational force has only one sign (always attractive), while Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 41 Coulomb force can be of both signs (attractive and repulsive), allowing possibility of cancellation of electric forces
1
1224-1227
2 Coulomb force and gravitational force follow the same inverse-square law But gravitational force has only one sign (always attractive), while Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 41 Coulomb force can be of both signs (attractive and repulsive), allowing possibility of cancellation of electric forces This is how gravity, despite being a much weaker force, can be a dominating and more pervasive force in nature
1
1225-1228
Coulomb force and gravitational force follow the same inverse-square law But gravitational force has only one sign (always attractive), while Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 41 Coulomb force can be of both signs (attractive and repulsive), allowing possibility of cancellation of electric forces This is how gravity, despite being a much weaker force, can be a dominating and more pervasive force in nature 3
1
1226-1229
But gravitational force has only one sign (always attractive), while Rationalised 2023-24 Electric Charges and Fields 41 Coulomb force can be of both signs (attractive and repulsive), allowing possibility of cancellation of electric forces This is how gravity, despite being a much weaker force, can be a dominating and more pervasive force in nature 3 The constant of proportionality k in Coulomb’s law is a matter of choice if the unit of charge is to be defined using Coulomb’s law
1
1227-1230
This is how gravity, despite being a much weaker force, can be a dominating and more pervasive force in nature 3 The constant of proportionality k in Coulomb’s law is a matter of choice if the unit of charge is to be defined using Coulomb’s law In SI units, however, what is defined is the unit of current (A) via its magnetic effect (Ampere’s law) and the unit of charge (coulomb) is simply defined by (1C = 1 A s)
1
1228-1231
3 The constant of proportionality k in Coulomb’s law is a matter of choice if the unit of charge is to be defined using Coulomb’s law In SI units, however, what is defined is the unit of current (A) via its magnetic effect (Ampere’s law) and the unit of charge (coulomb) is simply defined by (1C = 1 A s) In this case, the value of k is no longer arbitrary; it is approximately 9 × 109 N m2 C–2
1
1229-1232
The constant of proportionality k in Coulomb’s law is a matter of choice if the unit of charge is to be defined using Coulomb’s law In SI units, however, what is defined is the unit of current (A) via its magnetic effect (Ampere’s law) and the unit of charge (coulomb) is simply defined by (1C = 1 A s) In this case, the value of k is no longer arbitrary; it is approximately 9 × 109 N m2 C–2 4
1
1230-1233
In SI units, however, what is defined is the unit of current (A) via its magnetic effect (Ampere’s law) and the unit of charge (coulomb) is simply defined by (1C = 1 A s) In this case, the value of k is no longer arbitrary; it is approximately 9 × 109 N m2 C–2 4 The rather large value of k, i
1
1231-1234
In this case, the value of k is no longer arbitrary; it is approximately 9 × 109 N m2 C–2 4 The rather large value of k, i e
1
1232-1235
4 The rather large value of k, i e , the large size of the unit of charge (1C) from the point of view of electric effects arises because (as mentioned in point 3 already) the unit of charge is defined in terms of magnetic forces (forces on current–carrying wires) which are generally much weaker than the electric forces
1
1233-1236
The rather large value of k, i e , the large size of the unit of charge (1C) from the point of view of electric effects arises because (as mentioned in point 3 already) the unit of charge is defined in terms of magnetic forces (forces on current–carrying wires) which are generally much weaker than the electric forces Thus while 1 ampere is a unit of reasonable size for magnetic effects, 1 C = 1 A s, is too big a unit for electric effects
1
1234-1237
e , the large size of the unit of charge (1C) from the point of view of electric effects arises because (as mentioned in point 3 already) the unit of charge is defined in terms of magnetic forces (forces on current–carrying wires) which are generally much weaker than the electric forces Thus while 1 ampere is a unit of reasonable size for magnetic effects, 1 C = 1 A s, is too big a unit for electric effects 5
1
1235-1238
, the large size of the unit of charge (1C) from the point of view of electric effects arises because (as mentioned in point 3 already) the unit of charge is defined in terms of magnetic forces (forces on current–carrying wires) which are generally much weaker than the electric forces Thus while 1 ampere is a unit of reasonable size for magnetic effects, 1 C = 1 A s, is too big a unit for electric effects 5 The additive property of charge is not an ‘obvious’ property
1
1236-1239
Thus while 1 ampere is a unit of reasonable size for magnetic effects, 1 C = 1 A s, is too big a unit for electric effects 5 The additive property of charge is not an ‘obvious’ property It is related to the fact that electric charge has no direction associated with it; charge is a scalar
1
1237-1240
5 The additive property of charge is not an ‘obvious’ property It is related to the fact that electric charge has no direction associated with it; charge is a scalar 6
1
1238-1241
The additive property of charge is not an ‘obvious’ property It is related to the fact that electric charge has no direction associated with it; charge is a scalar 6 Charge is not only a scalar (or invariant) under rotation; it is also invariant for frames of reference in relative motion
1
1239-1242
It is related to the fact that electric charge has no direction associated with it; charge is a scalar 6 Charge is not only a scalar (or invariant) under rotation; it is also invariant for frames of reference in relative motion This is not always true for every scalar
1
1240-1243
6 Charge is not only a scalar (or invariant) under rotation; it is also invariant for frames of reference in relative motion This is not always true for every scalar For example, kinetic energy is a scalar under rotation, but is not invariant for frames of reference in relative motion
1
1241-1244
Charge is not only a scalar (or invariant) under rotation; it is also invariant for frames of reference in relative motion This is not always true for every scalar For example, kinetic energy is a scalar under rotation, but is not invariant for frames of reference in relative motion 7
1
1242-1245
This is not always true for every scalar For example, kinetic energy is a scalar under rotation, but is not invariant for frames of reference in relative motion 7 Conservation of total charge of an isolated system is a property independent of the scalar nature of charge noted in point 6
1
1243-1246
For example, kinetic energy is a scalar under rotation, but is not invariant for frames of reference in relative motion 7 Conservation of total charge of an isolated system is a property independent of the scalar nature of charge noted in point 6 Conservation refers to invariance in time in a given frame of reference
1
1244-1247
7 Conservation of total charge of an isolated system is a property independent of the scalar nature of charge noted in point 6 Conservation refers to invariance in time in a given frame of reference A quantity may be scalar but not conserved (like kinetic energy in an inelastic collision)
1
1245-1248
Conservation of total charge of an isolated system is a property independent of the scalar nature of charge noted in point 6 Conservation refers to invariance in time in a given frame of reference A quantity may be scalar but not conserved (like kinetic energy in an inelastic collision) On the other hand, one can have conserved vector quantity (e
1
1246-1249
Conservation refers to invariance in time in a given frame of reference A quantity may be scalar but not conserved (like kinetic energy in an inelastic collision) On the other hand, one can have conserved vector quantity (e g
1
1247-1250
A quantity may be scalar but not conserved (like kinetic energy in an inelastic collision) On the other hand, one can have conserved vector quantity (e g , angular momentum of an isolated system)
1
1248-1251
On the other hand, one can have conserved vector quantity (e g , angular momentum of an isolated system) 8
1
1249-1252
g , angular momentum of an isolated system) 8 Quantisation of electric charge is a basic (unexplained) law of nature; interestingly, there is no analogous law on quantisation of mass
1
1250-1253
, angular momentum of an isolated system) 8 Quantisation of electric charge is a basic (unexplained) law of nature; interestingly, there is no analogous law on quantisation of mass 9
1
1251-1254
8 Quantisation of electric charge is a basic (unexplained) law of nature; interestingly, there is no analogous law on quantisation of mass 9 Superposition principle should not be regarded as ‘obvious’, or equated with the law of addition of vectors
1
1252-1255
Quantisation of electric charge is a basic (unexplained) law of nature; interestingly, there is no analogous law on quantisation of mass 9 Superposition principle should not be regarded as ‘obvious’, or equated with the law of addition of vectors It says two things: force on one charge due to another charge is unaffected by the presence of other charges, and there are no additional three-body, four-body, etc
1
1253-1256
9 Superposition principle should not be regarded as ‘obvious’, or equated with the law of addition of vectors It says two things: force on one charge due to another charge is unaffected by the presence of other charges, and there are no additional three-body, four-body, etc , forces which arise only when there are more than two charges
1
1254-1257
Superposition principle should not be regarded as ‘obvious’, or equated with the law of addition of vectors It says two things: force on one charge due to another charge is unaffected by the presence of other charges, and there are no additional three-body, four-body, etc , forces which arise only when there are more than two charges 10
1
1255-1258
It says two things: force on one charge due to another charge is unaffected by the presence of other charges, and there are no additional three-body, four-body, etc , forces which arise only when there are more than two charges 10 The electric field due to a discrete charge configuration is not defined at the locations of the discrete charges
1
1256-1259
, forces which arise only when there are more than two charges 10 The electric field due to a discrete charge configuration is not defined at the locations of the discrete charges For continuous volume charge distribution, it is defined at any point in the distribution
1
1257-1260
10 The electric field due to a discrete charge configuration is not defined at the locations of the discrete charges For continuous volume charge distribution, it is defined at any point in the distribution For a surface charge distribution, electric field is discontinuous across the surface
1
1258-1261
The electric field due to a discrete charge configuration is not defined at the locations of the discrete charges For continuous volume charge distribution, it is defined at any point in the distribution For a surface charge distribution, electric field is discontinuous across the surface 11
1
1259-1262
For continuous volume charge distribution, it is defined at any point in the distribution For a surface charge distribution, electric field is discontinuous across the surface 11 The electric field due to a charge configuration with total charge zero is not zero; but for distances large compared to the size of the configuration, its field falls off faster than 1/r 2, typical of field due to a single charge
1
1260-1263
For a surface charge distribution, electric field is discontinuous across the surface 11 The electric field due to a charge configuration with total charge zero is not zero; but for distances large compared to the size of the configuration, its field falls off faster than 1/r 2, typical of field due to a single charge An electric dipole is the simplest example of this fact
1
1261-1264
11 The electric field due to a charge configuration with total charge zero is not zero; but for distances large compared to the size of the configuration, its field falls off faster than 1/r 2, typical of field due to a single charge An electric dipole is the simplest example of this fact Rationalised 2023-24 42 Physics EXERCISES 1
1
1262-1265
The electric field due to a charge configuration with total charge zero is not zero; but for distances large compared to the size of the configuration, its field falls off faster than 1/r 2, typical of field due to a single charge An electric dipole is the simplest example of this fact Rationalised 2023-24 42 Physics EXERCISES 1 1 What is the force between two small charged spheres having charges of 2 × 10–7C and 3 × 10–7C placed 30 cm apart in air
1
1263-1266
An electric dipole is the simplest example of this fact Rationalised 2023-24 42 Physics EXERCISES 1 1 What is the force between two small charged spheres having charges of 2 × 10–7C and 3 × 10–7C placed 30 cm apart in air 1
1
1264-1267
Rationalised 2023-24 42 Physics EXERCISES 1 1 What is the force between two small charged spheres having charges of 2 × 10–7C and 3 × 10–7C placed 30 cm apart in air 1 2 The electrostatic force on a small sphere of charge 0
1
1265-1268
1 What is the force between two small charged spheres having charges of 2 × 10–7C and 3 × 10–7C placed 30 cm apart in air 1 2 The electrostatic force on a small sphere of charge 0 4 mC due to another small sphere of charge –0
1
1266-1269
1 2 The electrostatic force on a small sphere of charge 0 4 mC due to another small sphere of charge –0 8 mC in air is 0
1
1267-1270
2 The electrostatic force on a small sphere of charge 0 4 mC due to another small sphere of charge –0 8 mC in air is 0 2 N
1
1268-1271
4 mC due to another small sphere of charge –0 8 mC in air is 0 2 N (a) What is the distance between the two spheres
1
1269-1272
8 mC in air is 0 2 N (a) What is the distance between the two spheres (b) What is the force on the second sphere due to the first
1
1270-1273
2 N (a) What is the distance between the two spheres (b) What is the force on the second sphere due to the first 1
1
1271-1274
(a) What is the distance between the two spheres (b) What is the force on the second sphere due to the first 1 3 Check that the ratio ke2/G memp is dimensionless
1
1272-1275
(b) What is the force on the second sphere due to the first 1 3 Check that the ratio ke2/G memp is dimensionless Look up a Table of Physical Constants and determine the value of this ratio
1
1273-1276
1 3 Check that the ratio ke2/G memp is dimensionless Look up a Table of Physical Constants and determine the value of this ratio What does the ratio signify
1
1274-1277
3 Check that the ratio ke2/G memp is dimensionless Look up a Table of Physical Constants and determine the value of this ratio What does the ratio signify 1
1
1275-1278
Look up a Table of Physical Constants and determine the value of this ratio What does the ratio signify 1 4 (a) Explain the meaning of the statement ‘electric charge of a body is quantised’
1
1276-1279
What does the ratio signify 1 4 (a) Explain the meaning of the statement ‘electric charge of a body is quantised’ (b) Why can one ignore quantisation of electric charge when dealing with macroscopic i
1
1277-1280
1 4 (a) Explain the meaning of the statement ‘electric charge of a body is quantised’ (b) Why can one ignore quantisation of electric charge when dealing with macroscopic i e
1
1278-1281
4 (a) Explain the meaning of the statement ‘electric charge of a body is quantised’ (b) Why can one ignore quantisation of electric charge when dealing with macroscopic i e , large scale charges
1
1279-1282
(b) Why can one ignore quantisation of electric charge when dealing with macroscopic i e , large scale charges 1
1
1280-1283
e , large scale charges 1 5 When a glass rod is rubbed with a silk cloth, charges appear on both
1
1281-1284
, large scale charges 1 5 When a glass rod is rubbed with a silk cloth, charges appear on both A similar phenomenon is observed with many other pairs of bodies
1
1282-1285
1 5 When a glass rod is rubbed with a silk cloth, charges appear on both A similar phenomenon is observed with many other pairs of bodies Explain how this observation is consistent with the law of conservation of charge
1
1283-1286
5 When a glass rod is rubbed with a silk cloth, charges appear on both A similar phenomenon is observed with many other pairs of bodies Explain how this observation is consistent with the law of conservation of charge 1
1
1284-1287
A similar phenomenon is observed with many other pairs of bodies Explain how this observation is consistent with the law of conservation of charge 1 6 Four point charges qA = 2 mC, qB = –5 mC, qC = 2 mC, and qD = –5 mC are located at the corners of a square ABCD of side 10 cm
1
1285-1288
Explain how this observation is consistent with the law of conservation of charge 1 6 Four point charges qA = 2 mC, qB = –5 mC, qC = 2 mC, and qD = –5 mC are located at the corners of a square ABCD of side 10 cm What is the force on a charge of 1 mC placed at the centre of the square
1
1286-1289
1 6 Four point charges qA = 2 mC, qB = –5 mC, qC = 2 mC, and qD = –5 mC are located at the corners of a square ABCD of side 10 cm What is the force on a charge of 1 mC placed at the centre of the square 1
1
1287-1290
6 Four point charges qA = 2 mC, qB = –5 mC, qC = 2 mC, and qD = –5 mC are located at the corners of a square ABCD of side 10 cm What is the force on a charge of 1 mC placed at the centre of the square 1 7 (a) An electrostatic field line is a continuous curve
1
1288-1291
What is the force on a charge of 1 mC placed at the centre of the square 1 7 (a) An electrostatic field line is a continuous curve That is, a field line cannot have sudden breaks
1
1289-1292
1 7 (a) An electrostatic field line is a continuous curve That is, a field line cannot have sudden breaks Why not