section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 7
388
| answers_spans
dict | template_name
stringclasses 5
values | template
stringclasses 5
values | rendered_input
stringlengths 166
9.94k
| rendered_output
stringlengths 1
388
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_2426
|
086dbb15-66f8-4ea6-87a3-273fa15cab41
|
KAIST produced a total of 48,398 alumni from 1975 to 2014, with 13,743 bachelors, 24,776 masters, and 9,879 doctorate degree holders. As of October 2015, 11,354 students were enrolled in KAIST with 4,469 bachelor’s, 3,091 master’s, and 3,794 doctoral students. More than 70 percent of KAIST undergraduates come from specialized science high schools. On average, about 600 international students from more than 70 different countries come to study at KAIST, making KAIST one of the most ethnically diverse universities in the country.
|
Up until 2014, which academic programs did KAIST produce less than 15,000 of?
|
{
"spans": [
"bachelors",
"doctorate degree holders"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Up until 2014, which academic programs did KAIST produce less than 15,000 of?
Answer based on following passage.
KAIST produced a total of 48,398 alumni from 1975 to 2014, with 13,743 bachelors, 24,776 masters, and 9,879 doctorate degree holders. As of October 2015, 11,354 students were enrolled in KAIST with 4,469 bachelor’s, 3,091 master’s, and 3,794 doctoral students. More than 70 percent of KAIST undergraduates come from specialized science high schools. On average, about 600 international students from more than 70 different countries come to study at KAIST, making KAIST one of the most ethnically diverse universities in the country.
Answer:
|
bachelors, doctorate degree holders
|
history_2426
|
0e09004f-7861-4de1-bd3b-09f5d93a231a
|
KAIST produced a total of 48,398 alumni from 1975 to 2014, with 13,743 bachelors, 24,776 masters, and 9,879 doctorate degree holders. As of October 2015, 11,354 students were enrolled in KAIST with 4,469 bachelor’s, 3,091 master’s, and 3,794 doctoral students. More than 70 percent of KAIST undergraduates come from specialized science high schools. On average, about 600 international students from more than 70 different countries come to study at KAIST, making KAIST one of the most ethnically diverse universities in the country.
|
How many more students were enrolled in doctoral programs than in masters as of October 2015?
|
{
"spans": [
"703"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more students were enrolled in doctoral programs than in masters as of October 2015?
Answer based on following passage.
KAIST produced a total of 48,398 alumni from 1975 to 2014, with 13,743 bachelors, 24,776 masters, and 9,879 doctorate degree holders. As of October 2015, 11,354 students were enrolled in KAIST with 4,469 bachelor’s, 3,091 master’s, and 3,794 doctoral students. More than 70 percent of KAIST undergraduates come from specialized science high schools. On average, about 600 international students from more than 70 different countries come to study at KAIST, making KAIST one of the most ethnically diverse universities in the country.
Answer:
|
703
|
history_2426
|
93b98019-0752-4276-bd88-7ed606e16fd2
|
KAIST produced a total of 48,398 alumni from 1975 to 2014, with 13,743 bachelors, 24,776 masters, and 9,879 doctorate degree holders. As of October 2015, 11,354 students were enrolled in KAIST with 4,469 bachelor’s, 3,091 master’s, and 3,794 doctoral students. More than 70 percent of KAIST undergraduates come from specialized science high schools. On average, about 600 international students from more than 70 different countries come to study at KAIST, making KAIST one of the most ethnically diverse universities in the country.
|
How many academic programs had over 3500 students enrolled as of October 2015?
|
{
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many academic programs had over 3500 students enrolled as of October 2015?
Answer based on following passage.
KAIST produced a total of 48,398 alumni from 1975 to 2014, with 13,743 bachelors, 24,776 masters, and 9,879 doctorate degree holders. As of October 2015, 11,354 students were enrolled in KAIST with 4,469 bachelor’s, 3,091 master’s, and 3,794 doctoral students. More than 70 percent of KAIST undergraduates come from specialized science high schools. On average, about 600 international students from more than 70 different countries come to study at KAIST, making KAIST one of the most ethnically diverse universities in the country.
Answer:
|
2
|
nfl_3500
|
5dfb04c7-b50f-4039-82c6-11a5962ab7aa
|
2000−03 The 2000 Houston Astros season season started off in typical fashion for Wagner, who saved three of the Astros first four Win (baseball) while retiring 16 of the first 20 batters he faced. However, after recording a save on May 4 against the 2000 Chicago Cubs season, he suffered back-to-back blown saves on May 12–13 against the 2000 Cincinnati Reds season. While he was still occasionally throwing 100 m.p.h. as measured by radar, he wasnt throwing his slider at 85 to 90 m.p.h. as often as he had been previously. Wagner continued to struggle before going on the disabled list with a torn flexor tendon in his pitching arm and would miss the final three and a half months of the season. He finished with 2–4 record, a 6.18 ERA, and six saves in 15 opportunities, striking out 28 and base on balls 18 in 27⅔ innings. He would rebound in 2001 Houston Astros season. Coming off elbow surgery, he posted a record of 2–5 with 39 saves in 41 chances, and an ERA of 2.73. He was one of the leading candidates for The Sporting News Comeback Player of the Year Award in the National League. In 62⅔ innings, he struck out 79 hitters.
|
How many losses did Wagner have?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many losses did Wagner have?
Answer based on following passage.
2000−03 The 2000 Houston Astros season season started off in typical fashion for Wagner, who saved three of the Astros first four Win (baseball) while retiring 16 of the first 20 batters he faced. However, after recording a save on May 4 against the 2000 Chicago Cubs season, he suffered back-to-back blown saves on May 12–13 against the 2000 Cincinnati Reds season. While he was still occasionally throwing 100 m.p.h. as measured by radar, he wasnt throwing his slider at 85 to 90 m.p.h. as often as he had been previously. Wagner continued to struggle before going on the disabled list with a torn flexor tendon in his pitching arm and would miss the final three and a half months of the season. He finished with 2–4 record, a 6.18 ERA, and six saves in 15 opportunities, striking out 28 and base on balls 18 in 27⅔ innings. He would rebound in 2001 Houston Astros season. Coming off elbow surgery, he posted a record of 2–5 with 39 saves in 41 chances, and an ERA of 2.73. He was one of the leading candidates for The Sporting News Comeback Player of the Year Award in the National League. In 62⅔ innings, he struck out 79 hitters.
Answer:
|
4
|
history_4033
|
45f8e362-ed9e-4728-895f-f96887b82eac
|
The county has 22 schools; 15 are public schools in 3 school districts, and 7 are private. South Harrison Community Schools is the largest district with 3,141 pupils in 2010. The district covers the southern half of the county and includes Corydon Central High School, Corydon Central Junior High School, South Central Junior & Senior High School, Corydon Intermediate, Corydon Elementary, Heth-Washington Elementary, and New Middletown Elementary. North Harrison Community School Corporation had 2,324 pupils in 2010 enrolled in North Harrison High School, North Harrison Middle School, North Harrison Elementary, and Morgan Elementary. Lanesville Community School Corporation is the smallest district serving only Franklin Township. It consists of Lanesville Junior Senior High School and Lanesville Elementary. In 2010, teachers in the North Harrison district averaged $50,800 in annual salary; South Harrison teachers averaged $48,500; Lanesville teachers averaged $51,500. North Harrison had a 2010 graduation rate of 81.5%; South Harrison 84.6%; Lanesville 91.5%. Lanesville and North Harrison students performed above average on 2010 statewide ISTEP+ tests, while South Harrison students performed below average.
|
What are the smallest amount of schools in the county, school district or private?
|
{
"spans": [
"private"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What are the smallest amount of schools in the county, school district or private?
Answer based on following passage.
The county has 22 schools; 15 are public schools in 3 school districts, and 7 are private. South Harrison Community Schools is the largest district with 3,141 pupils in 2010. The district covers the southern half of the county and includes Corydon Central High School, Corydon Central Junior High School, South Central Junior & Senior High School, Corydon Intermediate, Corydon Elementary, Heth-Washington Elementary, and New Middletown Elementary. North Harrison Community School Corporation had 2,324 pupils in 2010 enrolled in North Harrison High School, North Harrison Middle School, North Harrison Elementary, and Morgan Elementary. Lanesville Community School Corporation is the smallest district serving only Franklin Township. It consists of Lanesville Junior Senior High School and Lanesville Elementary. In 2010, teachers in the North Harrison district averaged $50,800 in annual salary; South Harrison teachers averaged $48,500; Lanesville teachers averaged $51,500. North Harrison had a 2010 graduation rate of 81.5%; South Harrison 84.6%; Lanesville 91.5%. Lanesville and North Harrison students performed above average on 2010 statewide ISTEP+ tests, while South Harrison students performed below average.
Answer:
|
private
|
history_4033
|
7ee95a82-c34c-4b8d-9365-919559f4d4ba
|
The county has 22 schools; 15 are public schools in 3 school districts, and 7 are private. South Harrison Community Schools is the largest district with 3,141 pupils in 2010. The district covers the southern half of the county and includes Corydon Central High School, Corydon Central Junior High School, South Central Junior & Senior High School, Corydon Intermediate, Corydon Elementary, Heth-Washington Elementary, and New Middletown Elementary. North Harrison Community School Corporation had 2,324 pupils in 2010 enrolled in North Harrison High School, North Harrison Middle School, North Harrison Elementary, and Morgan Elementary. Lanesville Community School Corporation is the smallest district serving only Franklin Township. It consists of Lanesville Junior Senior High School and Lanesville Elementary. In 2010, teachers in the North Harrison district averaged $50,800 in annual salary; South Harrison teachers averaged $48,500; Lanesville teachers averaged $51,500. North Harrison had a 2010 graduation rate of 81.5%; South Harrison 84.6%; Lanesville 91.5%. Lanesville and North Harrison students performed above average on 2010 statewide ISTEP+ tests, while South Harrison students performed below average.
|
How many more salary does North Harrison teacher average than South Harrison?
|
{
"spans": [
"2300"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more salary does North Harrison teacher average than South Harrison?
Answer based on following passage.
The county has 22 schools; 15 are public schools in 3 school districts, and 7 are private. South Harrison Community Schools is the largest district with 3,141 pupils in 2010. The district covers the southern half of the county and includes Corydon Central High School, Corydon Central Junior High School, South Central Junior & Senior High School, Corydon Intermediate, Corydon Elementary, Heth-Washington Elementary, and New Middletown Elementary. North Harrison Community School Corporation had 2,324 pupils in 2010 enrolled in North Harrison High School, North Harrison Middle School, North Harrison Elementary, and Morgan Elementary. Lanesville Community School Corporation is the smallest district serving only Franklin Township. It consists of Lanesville Junior Senior High School and Lanesville Elementary. In 2010, teachers in the North Harrison district averaged $50,800 in annual salary; South Harrison teachers averaged $48,500; Lanesville teachers averaged $51,500. North Harrison had a 2010 graduation rate of 81.5%; South Harrison 84.6%; Lanesville 91.5%. Lanesville and North Harrison students performed above average on 2010 statewide ISTEP+ tests, while South Harrison students performed below average.
Answer:
|
2300
|
history_2781
|
8f36f5ee-e447-4dad-a236-29d0b4521228
|
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
|
Which area had the largest gross, outside North America or inside north America?
|
{
"spans": [
"outside North America"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which area had the largest gross, outside North America or inside north America?
Answer based on following passage.
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Answer:
|
outside North America
|
history_2781
|
0030eec1-585f-44a7-91a2-b69e613ba4aa
|
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
|
How many more money did Titanic earn over the opening weekend than the opening day?
|
{
"spans": [
"19979317"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more money did Titanic earn over the opening weekend than the opening day?
Answer based on following passage.
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Answer:
|
19979317
|
history_2781
|
a4586fbd-997f-4438-abc0-43857b4d93d6
|
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
|
Which film ranked number one at the box office on December 19, 1997?
|
{
"spans": [
"Titanic"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which film ranked number one at the box office on December 19, 1997?
Answer based on following passage.
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Answer:
|
Titanic
|
history_2781
|
23557879-5901-4d7d-b0c6-4de8f5b1c71f
|
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
|
How many weeks after Titanic's highest grossing day did it stay at number one at the box office?
|
{
"spans": [
"7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many weeks after Titanic's highest grossing day did it stay at number one at the box office?
Answer based on following passage.
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Answer:
|
7
|
history_2781
|
9a7eb035-7e6c-4192-8745-f2afc33c3584
|
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
|
Which film opened on December 19, 1997?
|
{
"spans": [
"Titanic"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which film opened on December 19, 1997?
Answer based on following passage.
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Answer:
|
Titanic
|
history_2781
|
3b0b3c52-5d44-4307-a9c3-9a805ee1e745
|
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
|
How many dollars of its domestic gross did Titanic make after opening weekend?
|
{
"spans": [
"572150057"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many dollars of its domestic gross did Titanic make after opening weekend?
Answer based on following passage.
Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Answer:
|
572150057
|
nfl_2643
|
b36ad723-8398-44d9-a245-a8fa99d34c2b
|
A late game rally by Washington led them to the Eagles' 26 yard line. A shot to the end zone by Robert Griffin III would be intercepted by Brandon Boykin, clinching an Eagles win. The Eagles would move to 6-5. This is the Eagles first win at Lincoln Financial Field since Week 4 of the 2012 season, because prior to this game, the Eagles had never won a game in their home stadium in 414 days since that same week, snapping a 10-game losing streak at home with this win.
|
How many more wins than losses did the Eagles have after this game?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more wins than losses did the Eagles have after this game?
Answer based on following passage.
A late game rally by Washington led them to the Eagles' 26 yard line. A shot to the end zone by Robert Griffin III would be intercepted by Brandon Boykin, clinching an Eagles win. The Eagles would move to 6-5. This is the Eagles first win at Lincoln Financial Field since Week 4 of the 2012 season, because prior to this game, the Eagles had never won a game in their home stadium in 414 days since that same week, snapping a 10-game losing streak at home with this win.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_3295
|
aa4f1db7-7c11-458c-929b-574096b479f9
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
What was the second highest percentage of people?
|
{
"spans": [
"27.65% Betawi people"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What was the second highest percentage of people?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
27.65% Betawi people
|
history_3295
|
15300c87-c132-453d-bcd2-332b4d11b09e
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Which groups made up less 3.5% in the 2000 census?
|
{
"spans": [
"Minangkabau",
"Ethnic Malays"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which groups made up less 3.5% in the 2000 census?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Minangkabau, Ethnic Malays
|
history_3295
|
f8a2ed3f-e748-4f52-8876-dee4b9a86322
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many percent did the Ethnic Malays, Minangkabau and Batak people make up in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"8.41"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent did the Ethnic Malays, Minangkabau and Batak people make up in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
8.41
|
history_3295
|
1cbf64f3-24da-47c2-b548-6f018d8797de
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Was there a higher percentage of Javanese people in 2000 or in 2010?
|
{
"spans": [
"2010"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Was there a higher percentage of Javanese people in 2000 or in 2010?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
2010
|
history_3295
|
9728ef9d-bb41-4c7d-bd6f-bb239169e528
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
In 2010, how many percent of people were either Javanese, Betawi or Sundanese?
|
{
"spans": [
"79.07"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: In 2010, how many percent of people were either Javanese, Betawi or Sundanese?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
79.07
|
history_3295
|
4ac0f924-cd66-4289-9912-c1ba36327714
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Were there more Betawi and Sundanese people in 2000 or in 2010?
|
{
"spans": [
"2000"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Were there more Betawi and Sundanese people in 2000 or in 2010?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
2000
|
history_3295
|
f4f410ff-5d4a-4b9e-8ba7-12320dde4d79
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
In 2010, which groups made up between 5 and 15% of the population?
|
{
"spans": [
"Sundanese",
"Chinese Indonesians"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: In 2010, which groups made up between 5 and 15% of the population?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Sundanese, Chinese Indonesians
|
history_3295
|
35186a76-89ea-4fe2-965d-dc879e41565e
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Which ethnic groups that had more than 5% of the population in 2000 increased in the year 2010?
|
{
"spans": [
"Chinese Indonesians",
"Betawi",
"Javanese"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which ethnic groups that had more than 5% of the population in 2000 increased in the year 2010?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Chinese Indonesians, Betawi, Javanese
|
history_3295
|
5286f1b0-67df-4393-b5bd-179cc617b57a
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many of the ethnic groups had less than 3% of the population but more than 1% in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many of the ethnic groups had less than 3% of the population but more than 1% in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
3
|
history_3295
|
5ed80fc9-3d9b-4f4d-a4ed-b83d60485f1a
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Which ethnic groups saw a decrease in 2010 from 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"Sundanese",
"Batak",
"Minangkabau",
"Ethnic Malays"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which ethnic groups saw a decrease in 2010 from 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Sundanese, Batak, Minangkabau, Ethnic Malays
|
history_3295
|
337a8be9-56e8-487f-84a6-84952ff567ef
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many more percentage points of the population is Betawi and Sundanese combined than Javanese?
|
{
"spans": [
"7.76"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage points of the population is Betawi and Sundanese combined than Javanese?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
7.76
|
history_3295
|
85e70ed1-162e-4dd5-bc72-f2eb1f7a2a2f
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Which ethnicity makes up more of the population, the Batak or the Sundanese?
|
{
"spans": [
"Sundanese"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which ethnicity makes up more of the population, the Batak or the Sundanese?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Sundanese
|
history_3295
|
27bf2b58-f415-48bb-b5ca-e4dc01e54d5a
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
What are all the populations that have a higher percentage than Chinese?
|
{
"spans": [
"Javanese",
"Betawi",
"Sundanese"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What are all the populations that have a higher percentage than Chinese?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Javanese, Betawi, Sundanese
|
history_3295
|
2bb909cb-0f07-40ad-8fee-07a05a3fdeae
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many more percentage of Minangkabau than Ethnic Malays?
|
{
"spans": [
"1.89"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage of Minangkabau than Ethnic Malays?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
1.89
|
history_3295
|
788ec0d1-9e6c-4f73-883c-5821e6f46660
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many Betawi and Sundanese population combined in Jakarta?
|
{
"spans": [
"13.68"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many Betawi and Sundanese population combined in Jakarta?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
13.68
|
history_3295
|
da07c77a-c28e-469b-bbde-50bd86e6914c
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
What are all the populations with a lower percentage than Betawi in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"Sundanese",
"Chinese Indonesians",
"Batak",
"Minangkabau",
"Ethnic Malays",
"others"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What are all the populations with a lower percentage than Betawi in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Sundanese, Chinese Indonesians, Batak, Minangkabau, Ethnic Malays, others
|
history_3295
|
017bfec5-4d36-4a16-987e-22dc01adc40e
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Which population has the largest percentage of population in Jakarta 2000: Javenese or Batak?
|
{
"spans": [
"Javenese"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which population has the largest percentage of population in Jakarta 2000: Javenese or Batak?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Javenese
|
history_3295
|
2ab13113-060b-4667-8f1a-044c83684a87
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many more Chinese Indonesians than Batak in Jakarta?
|
{
"spans": [
"1.92"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more Chinese Indonesians than Batak in Jakarta?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
1.92
|
history_3295
|
01a08191-50cb-45c4-bb8b-e8059064c3c3
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many more percentage Betaw lived in Jakarta in 2010 than in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"0.6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage Betaw lived in Jakarta in 2010 than in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
0.6
|
history_3295
|
425720c2-021c-4084-82ff-696f90b7c593
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Which year had the lowest percentage of Minangkabau population, 2000 or 2010?
|
{
"spans": [
"2010"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which year had the lowest percentage of Minangkabau population, 2000 or 2010?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
2010
|
history_3295
|
0efc54cf-e129-4105-9d68-0d50b08b3daa
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
Which people had the lowest population percentage in Jakarta in 2010, Javenese or Betawi?
|
{
"spans": [
"Betawi"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which people had the lowest population percentage in Jakarta in 2010, Javenese or Betawi?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Betawi
|
history_3295
|
bec3c7e2-dc8c-40cc-b15f-16769c73fa4e
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many more percentage did Ethnic Malays have than in 2000 than in 2010
|
{
"spans": [
"0.66"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage did Ethnic Malays have than in 2000 than in 2010
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
0.66
|
history_3295
|
a0ee4657-d56a-414d-a121-f40d3325aea0
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
What all people had a higher percentage of population than the Batak in 2010?
|
{
"spans": [
"Chinese Indonesians",
"Sundanese",
"Betawi",
"Javanese"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What all people had a higher percentage of population than the Batak in 2010?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
Chinese Indonesians, Sundanese, Betawi, Javanese
|
history_3295
|
a34c56bc-c090-47c9-a28b-dcb9a64a982f
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians and Batak combined in 2011?
|
{
"spans": [
"26.13"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians and Batak combined in 2011?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
26.13
|
history_3295
|
246611c4-5211-4ae9-9b27-0fe7c61714fe
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau, Ethnic Malays and Batak combined in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"21.22"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau, Ethnic Malays and Batak combined in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
21.22
|
history_3295
|
050c130e-ed81-47f3-ab52-3b717a2f0180
|
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
|
How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau and Batak combined in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"22.84"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau and Batak combined in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Answer:
|
22.84
|
history_2615
|
5288d6b5-1c77-4254-a7be-57e0cfba2106
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
Which years did Aston Martin not sell more than 5000 cars in?
|
{
"spans": [
"2014",
"2013"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which years did Aston Martin not sell more than 5000 cars in?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
2014, 2013
|
history_2615
|
9051bf03-6a4f-4b9e-b84d-feb39d1cc8fc
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013?
|
{
"spans": [
"2007"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
2007
|
history_2615
|
d188cec7-a3ed-47b2-8730-009cfcd42e56
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
How many more cars did Aston Martin sell in 2013 compared to 2014?
|
{
"spans": [
"700"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more cars did Aston Martin sell in 2013 compared to 2014?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
700
|
history_2615
|
bfba03ea-b495-418a-9566-68d427defca8
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013?
|
{
"spans": [
"2007"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
2007
|
history_2615
|
9b77f589-677f-4687-bbd3-a7b2cccd765d
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
Did Aston Martin report more losses in 2014 or 2013?
|
{
"spans": [
"2014"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did Aston Martin report more losses in 2014 or 2013?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
2014
|
history_2615
|
de9bd97d-fed1-4231-a53d-296d2235159a
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
How many fewer cars were sold in 2013 than in 2007?
|
{
"spans": [
"3100"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many fewer cars were sold in 2013 than in 2007?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
3100
|
history_2615
|
232e140b-b983-4974-8946-22e2d18f20a3
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
Did the payment in kind notes or senior secured notes have a higher interest rate?
|
{
"spans": [
"payment in kind"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did the payment in kind notes or senior secured notes have a higher interest rate?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
payment in kind
|
history_2615
|
6e4e3ed2-0d24-4a18-93c6-9f55b6727caa
|
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
|
How many percentage points higher was a "payment in kind" note than a senior secured one?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percentage points higher was a "payment in kind" note than a senior secured one?
Answer based on following passage.
In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_2435
|
971c1b4a-689a-4e38-a25e-f9443a0d4689
|
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
|
How many points did the IPC gain from 2005 to 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"1469.92"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many points did the IPC gain from 2005 to 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Answer:
|
1469.92
|
history_2435
|
d9af79ad-ea27-4e2f-8ffe-821352bd3388
|
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
|
Which year was the local stock market capitalisation lower, 2004 or 2005?
|
{
"spans": [
"2004"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which year was the local stock market capitalisation lower, 2004 or 2005?
Answer based on following passage.
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Answer:
|
2004
|
history_2435
|
04299cf8-6758-433f-a839-a8ea84f7f07f
|
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
|
What year were there 153 companies listed on the IPC?
|
{
"spans": [
"2005"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year were there 153 companies listed on the IPC?
Answer based on following passage.
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Answer:
|
2005
|
history_2435
|
e36da2a0-049f-4c8c-9bc5-af23af74d7c5
|
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
|
How many more companies were listed in 2005 compared to 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"18"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more companies were listed in 2005 compared to 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Answer:
|
18
|
nfl_3504
|
afe4cc49-1efa-40e8-b0c7-0010d5b239fd
|
Downings return to action saw him returning to his preferred left wing role, with James Milner moving to central midfield for Villa. Downing played in Villas first win at Old Trafford against Manchester United F.C. since 1983 on 12 December 2009 in their 1–0 victory over the Red Devils. Downing then went on to score his first and second league goal for Villa in their 5–2 win against Burnley on 2 February 2010. His second season with Aston Villa had been a much improved one, he scored the first Premier League goal of the season against West Ham United at Villa Park on 14 August in a 3–0 win. In the final match of the season, Downing scored his eighth against Liverpool at Villa Park with the result ending 1–0; during the 2010–11 season, Downing made 44 appearances and scored eight goals in all competitions. Downing was the subject of speculation over the summer, with Liverpool F.C. showing interest in the winger. On 6 July, Liverpool tabled a bid of £15 million for Downing but this was rejected by Villa, who said they would not let Downing go for less than £20m. New Villa manager Alex McLeish then stated that Downing was not for sale and he would not be leaving Villa in the summer. However, on 13 July 2011, a fee was agreed between Aston Villa and Liverpool for the transfer of Downing.
|
What games did Downing score the winner?
|
{
"spans": [
"2012 Football League Cup Final",
"FA Cup quarter-final"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What games did Downing score the winner?
Answer based on following passage.
Downings return to action saw him returning to his preferred left wing role, with James Milner moving to central midfield for Villa. Downing played in Villas first win at Old Trafford against Manchester United F.C. since 1983 on 12 December 2009 in their 1–0 victory over the Red Devils. Downing then went on to score his first and second league goal for Villa in their 5–2 win against Burnley on 2 February 2010. His second season with Aston Villa had been a much improved one, he scored the first Premier League goal of the season against West Ham United at Villa Park on 14 August in a 3–0 win. In the final match of the season, Downing scored his eighth against Liverpool at Villa Park with the result ending 1–0; during the 2010–11 season, Downing made 44 appearances and scored eight goals in all competitions. Downing was the subject of speculation over the summer, with Liverpool F.C. showing interest in the winger. On 6 July, Liverpool tabled a bid of £15 million for Downing but this was rejected by Villa, who said they would not let Downing go for less than £20m. New Villa manager Alex McLeish then stated that Downing was not for sale and he would not be leaving Villa in the summer. However, on 13 July 2011, a fee was agreed between Aston Villa and Liverpool for the transfer of Downing.
Answer:
|
2012 Football League Cup Final, FA Cup quarter-final
|
history_2845
|
366c21d9-31c2-43c0-8aef-91a8ec6c13ba
|
From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
|
How many more mg/L is highest amount of arsenic in drinking water linked to skin cancer risk than the lowest mg/L amount?
|
{
"spans": [
".001683"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more mg/L is highest amount of arsenic in drinking water linked to skin cancer risk than the lowest mg/L amount?
Answer based on following passage.
From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
Answer:
|
.001683
|
history_2845
|
c61f5acb-04b9-46db-9905-a9ccecf40521
|
From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
|
According to the passage, which substance may pose a risk of skin cancer?
|
{
"spans": [
"arsenic"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: According to the passage, which substance may pose a risk of skin cancer?
Answer based on following passage.
From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
Answer:
|
arsenic
|
history_3240
|
d9236add-7a39-4507-8735-91678483984b
|
An arbitration committee was duly set up by the Ministry of Health and Welfare on 25 April, but it took almost a year to draw up a draft compensation plan. A newspaper leak in March 1970 revealed that the committee would ask Chisso to pay only ¥2 million ($5,600) for dead patients and ¥140,000 to ¥200,000 ($390 to $560) per year to surviving patients. The arbitration group were dismayed by the sums on offer. They petitioned the committee, together with patients and supporters of the litigation group, for a fairer deal. The arbitration committee announced their compensation plan on 25 May in a disorderly session at the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Tokyo. Thirteen protesters were arrested. Instead of accepting the agreement as they had promised, the arbitration group asked for increases. The committee was forced to revise its plan and the patients waited inside the ministry building for two days while they did so. The final agreement was signed on 27 May. Payments for deaths ranged from ¥1.7 million to ¥4 million ($4,700 to $11,100), one-time payments from ¥1 million to ¥4.2 million ($2,760 to $11,660) and annual payments between ¥170,000 and ¥380,000 ($470 to $1,100) for surviving patients. On the day of the signing, the Minamata Citizens Council held a protest outside the Minamata factory gates. One of the Chisso trade unions held an eight-hour strike in protest at the poor treatment of the arbitration group by their own company.
|
Which had the least millions in payment: payment of death or one time payment?
|
{
"spans": [
"payment of death"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which had the least millions in payment: payment of death or one time payment?
Answer based on following passage.
An arbitration committee was duly set up by the Ministry of Health and Welfare on 25 April, but it took almost a year to draw up a draft compensation plan. A newspaper leak in March 1970 revealed that the committee would ask Chisso to pay only ¥2 million ($5,600) for dead patients and ¥140,000 to ¥200,000 ($390 to $560) per year to surviving patients. The arbitration group were dismayed by the sums on offer. They petitioned the committee, together with patients and supporters of the litigation group, for a fairer deal. The arbitration committee announced their compensation plan on 25 May in a disorderly session at the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Tokyo. Thirteen protesters were arrested. Instead of accepting the agreement as they had promised, the arbitration group asked for increases. The committee was forced to revise its plan and the patients waited inside the ministry building for two days while they did so. The final agreement was signed on 27 May. Payments for deaths ranged from ¥1.7 million to ¥4 million ($4,700 to $11,100), one-time payments from ¥1 million to ¥4.2 million ($2,760 to $11,660) and annual payments between ¥170,000 and ¥380,000 ($470 to $1,100) for surviving patients. On the day of the signing, the Minamata Citizens Council held a protest outside the Minamata factory gates. One of the Chisso trade unions held an eight-hour strike in protest at the poor treatment of the arbitration group by their own company.
Answer:
|
payment of death
|
history_2245
|
6138a8e5-7541-4e7e-8e15-d5bf1a3851b9
|
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
|
Which sector of the economy contributes the least?
|
{
"spans": [
"primary"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which sector of the economy contributes the least?
Answer based on following passage.
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Answer:
|
primary
|
history_2245
|
a70e9d48-073b-4746-bc67-18940db4df6d
|
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
|
Did the city have more employees or salaried employees in 2012?
|
{
"spans": [
"employees"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did the city have more employees or salaried employees in 2012?
Answer based on following passage.
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Answer:
|
employees
|
history_2245
|
36cb4114-51fb-493c-9843-1f1286eab8ac
|
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
|
How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute then the secondary sector?
|
{
"spans": [
"53"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute then the secondary sector?
Answer based on following passage.
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Answer:
|
53
|
history_2245
|
69fa3ebe-f969-4e9e-a509-8cf77de336a2
|
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
|
How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute than the primary sector?
|
{
"spans": [
"68.73"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute than the primary sector?
Answer based on following passage.
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Answer:
|
68.73
|
history_2245
|
0e2450a4-31e2-4f04-b60a-fe8517ae6413
|
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
|
How many more units did the city have than companies?
|
{
"spans": [
"4931"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more units did the city have than companies?
Answer based on following passage.
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Answer:
|
4931
|
history_2245
|
498bf455-73e5-4299-bb32-3e43a461ac0e
|
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
|
How many more employees were there than salaried employees?
|
{
"spans": [
"87225"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more employees were there than salaried employees?
Answer based on following passage.
The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Answer:
|
87225
|
history_2938
|
348590f0-2a0f-4d2a-884c-baa8dbebdf61
|
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
|
How many years passed when Moldova-Russia improved and then deteriorated?
|
{
"spans": [
"5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years passed when Moldova-Russia improved and then deteriorated?
Answer based on following passage.
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Answer:
|
5
|
history_2938
|
95724c0e-0f4e-4843-9c7b-b002052aa99b
|
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
|
How many years was Vasile Tarlev the new goverment?
|
{
"spans": [
"7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years was Vasile Tarlev the new goverment?
Answer based on following passage.
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Answer:
|
7
|
history_2938
|
54f0a6fa-ab68-4960-9c77-298823161f3a
|
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
|
How many years was Zinaida Greeanali the new government?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years was Zinaida Greeanali the new government?
Answer based on following passage.
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_2938
|
7a52abf9-9b68-45df-afc9-ec9f1ad4a29b
|
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
|
How many years after the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova was outlawed was it reinstituted?
|
{
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years after the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova was outlawed was it reinstituted?
Answer based on following passage.
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Answer:
|
2
|
history_2938
|
1d9d79ce-672d-49ec-95d5-2f9152224325
|
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
|
How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected the country's third president was he re-elected?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected the country's third president was he re-elected?
Answer based on following passage.
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Answer:
|
4
|
history_2938
|
0b873ddf-6734-4fd9-8244-9ad304671a05
|
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
|
How many years was Vasile Tarlev hold office?
|
{
"spans": [
"7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years was Vasile Tarlev hold office?
Answer based on following passage.
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Answer:
|
7
|
history_2938
|
9685c3dd-d953-4d6c-9d33-a6d0a2043dc8
|
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
|
How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected as the country's third president did the decline of the Communist Party begin?
|
{
"spans": [
"8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected as the country's third president did the decline of the Communist Party begin?
Answer based on following passage.
Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Answer:
|
8
|
history_2916
|
c09fd270-4d9c-40ec-8819-c87486c0d9fe
|
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
|
How many years saw a share of value addition of the cotton textile industry below 3%?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years saw a share of value addition of the cotton textile industry below 3%?
Answer based on following passage.
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_2916
|
cf082d12-986b-4d19-86dc-25915afe45b1
|
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
|
Which industry saw a larger share of value added in 1801, cotton textile industry or woollen industry?
|
{
"spans": [
"cotton textile industry"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which industry saw a larger share of value added in 1801, cotton textile industry or woollen industry?
Answer based on following passage.
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Answer:
|
cotton textile industry
|
history_2916
|
aaa6b168-89b5-4896-a479-815f769d95d1
|
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
|
How many years did it take for cotton spun to go from 5.1 million pounds to 56 million pounds?
|
{
"spans": [
"19"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years did it take for cotton spun to go from 5.1 million pounds to 56 million pounds?
Answer based on following passage.
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Answer:
|
19
|
history_2916
|
9c328138-70d1-4f5f-ba82-58ae5bf0473e
|
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
|
Was the share of value added by the cotton textile industry larger in 1760 or 1831?
|
{
"spans": [
"1831"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Was the share of value added by the cotton textile industry larger in 1760 or 1831?
Answer based on following passage.
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Answer:
|
1831
|
history_2916
|
e653e479-7d3a-4be2-bb21-a6f2d90160e7
|
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
|
How many more percent was the value added by the cotton textile industry in 1831 compared to 1801?
|
{
"spans": [
"5.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percent was the value added by the cotton textile industry in 1831 compared to 1801?
Answer based on following passage.
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Answer:
|
5.4
|
history_2916
|
da23923a-259c-4905-b06f-ae5a50a12626
|
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
|
Was more value added by the cotton textile industry or the woollen industry in 1801?
|
{
"spans": [
"cotton textile industry"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Was more value added by the cotton textile industry or the woollen industry in 1801?
Answer based on following passage.
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Answer:
|
cotton textile industry
|
history_2916
|
fddde72d-eae6-4c81-9b72-c19b14268fcc
|
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
|
How many million pounds did the cottun spun increase between 1781 and 1800?
|
{
"spans": [
"50.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many million pounds did the cottun spun increase between 1781 and 1800?
Answer based on following passage.
The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Answer:
|
50.9
|
nfl_3536
|
44133a6b-a0aa-4976-bd04-0e3d47d21592
|
Sint Maarten returned to international football in 2016, entering 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification and being drawn into Group 2 along with Grenada national football team and the United States Virgin Islands national soccer team with the first round matches taking place on 22 and 26 March 2016. Sint Maarten had been absent from senior CFU competition for nineteen years as they entered the tournament. In January 2016 it was announced that Sint Maartens squad for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification would be composed solely of players from Flames United SC, reigning champions from the 2014/2015 Senior league competitions and the champions of the 2012/2013 Excellence Division between the islands of Sint Maarten, Saint Martin and St. Barths. However, shortly thereafter it was reported that the previous report was inaccurate and that Flames United would actually be competing in the CFU Club Championship. Sint Maarten played its first senior mens international in 12 years on 13 March 2016 as it hosted a 2–0 home victory against Anguilla national football team as part of each sides preparation for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification. Both of Sint Maartens goals were scored by Joost Röben. In the first match of the tournament, Sint Maarten held Grenada to a scoreless draw in the first half which saw two of Sint Maartens starters sustain injuries. It was later revealed that Raymond Wolff had sustained a broken rib before coming off in the first half while fellow-Dutchman Rick De Punder was credited with an own goal. Grenada scored five goals in the second half to secure the 5–0 victory. Sint Maarten arrived on Grenada for the 8pm match at 4pm after the funds for the team airfare, paid for by the CFU, did not reach the airline in time and no seats were available. SMSA President Johnny Singh thought that the team would not be able to compete but another flight was arranged in time. The same scenario occurred for the return flight but the team was expected to be home on the Thursday prior to the teams match against USVI on Saturday. Sint Maarten went on to lose the match to USVI 1–2, ending the teams qualifying campaign. Sint Maartens only goal was scored by Ramsleii Boelijn.
|
How many days apart were the first round matches in the US Virgin Islands?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many days apart were the first round matches in the US Virgin Islands?
Answer based on following passage.
Sint Maarten returned to international football in 2016, entering 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification and being drawn into Group 2 along with Grenada national football team and the United States Virgin Islands national soccer team with the first round matches taking place on 22 and 26 March 2016. Sint Maarten had been absent from senior CFU competition for nineteen years as they entered the tournament. In January 2016 it was announced that Sint Maartens squad for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification would be composed solely of players from Flames United SC, reigning champions from the 2014/2015 Senior league competitions and the champions of the 2012/2013 Excellence Division between the islands of Sint Maarten, Saint Martin and St. Barths. However, shortly thereafter it was reported that the previous report was inaccurate and that Flames United would actually be competing in the CFU Club Championship. Sint Maarten played its first senior mens international in 12 years on 13 March 2016 as it hosted a 2–0 home victory against Anguilla national football team as part of each sides preparation for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification. Both of Sint Maartens goals were scored by Joost Röben. In the first match of the tournament, Sint Maarten held Grenada to a scoreless draw in the first half which saw two of Sint Maartens starters sustain injuries. It was later revealed that Raymond Wolff had sustained a broken rib before coming off in the first half while fellow-Dutchman Rick De Punder was credited with an own goal. Grenada scored five goals in the second half to secure the 5–0 victory. Sint Maarten arrived on Grenada for the 8pm match at 4pm after the funds for the team airfare, paid for by the CFU, did not reach the airline in time and no seats were available. SMSA President Johnny Singh thought that the team would not be able to compete but another flight was arranged in time. The same scenario occurred for the return flight but the team was expected to be home on the Thursday prior to the teams match against USVI on Saturday. Sint Maarten went on to lose the match to USVI 1–2, ending the teams qualifying campaign. Sint Maartens only goal was scored by Ramsleii Boelijn.
Answer:
|
4
|
history_2736
|
dbd18fda-7f50-4f30-93ca-48b8d7223e09
|
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
|
How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2011?
|
{
"spans": [
"1855364"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2011?
Answer based on following passage.
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Answer:
|
1855364
|
history_2736
|
66a0d29f-653c-4e10-8fdb-c113bc8f87a5
|
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
|
How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"1852999"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Answer:
|
1852999
|
history_2736
|
28af6824-11d1-4fd6-b4af-b70c35523ff0
|
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
|
Was the population in West Virginia higher in 2012 or 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"2012"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Was the population in West Virginia higher in 2012 or 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Answer:
|
2012
|
history_2736
|
3280ac6e-891d-490e-abea-f852d0b71f41
|
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
|
Were there more deaths or births in West Virginia since the last census as of 2012?
|
{
"spans": [
"deaths"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Were there more deaths or births in West Virginia since the last census as of 2012?
Answer based on following passage.
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Answer:
|
deaths
|
history_2736
|
9b60ff88-23f1-4c42-9d59-e0b7a8ae100c
|
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
|
How many more people migrated from within the US to West Virginia compared to from outside the US?
|
{
"spans": [
"6827"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people migrated from within the US to West Virginia compared to from outside the US?
Answer based on following passage.
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Answer:
|
6827
|
history_2736
|
f99a6bc3-1312-4e8c-82e3-ad8b90dbb12b
|
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
|
How many people were in the West Virginia population in 2000?
|
{
"spans": [
"1852999"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many people were in the West Virginia population in 2000?
Answer based on following passage.
As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Answer:
|
1852999
|
history_2715
|
259fe02b-be60-4579-9606-bccfc05c9414
|
Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
|
What year in the 1950s did the Seabees deploy to Vietnam the second time?
|
{
"spans": [
"1956"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year in the 1950s did the Seabees deploy to Vietnam the second time?
Answer based on following passage.
Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
Answer:
|
1956
|
history_2715
|
6559484d-57ba-4d12-b085-ca0dc5dbef91
|
Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
|
How many battalions were rotating to Vietnam in April 1968, not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units??
|
{
"spans": [
"19"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many battalions were rotating to Vietnam in April 1968, not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units??
Answer based on following passage.
Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
Answer:
|
19
|
history_2457
|
2acf50a6-df42-49b4-a20b-e4788475232d
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of people were not Christians?
|
{
"spans": [
"53.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not Christians?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
53.2
|
history_2457
|
010f252a-48c3-49c2-b5c0-cdb1153e0b12
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of people were not Russian Orthodox?
|
{
"spans": [
"59"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not Russian Orthodox?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
59
|
history_2457
|
b461add3-9da9-4e6b-b283-251073bea8c1
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of people were not Orthodox?
|
{
"spans": [
"98.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not Orthodox?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
98.5
|
history_2457
|
8090185d-6b80-41ac-9884-5e6191c4a622
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of people were not unaffiliated Christians?
|
{
"spans": [
"93.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not unaffiliated Christians?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
93.9
|
history_2457
|
332b466f-bb87-4bf5-af07-2582fe7dd4ea
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of people were not spiritual but not religious?
|
{
"spans": [
"75"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not spiritual but not religious?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
75
|
history_2457
|
9aa9d10f-ebd3-4b3d-aab6-969395927b50
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of people were not atheists?
|
{
"spans": [
"87"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not atheists?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
87
|
history_2457
|
22e90cf1-e473-4463-865d-7de12787d07a
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of people were not Muslims?
|
{
"spans": [
"93.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not Muslims?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
93.5
|
history_2457
|
8aeef0e6-e2bb-41ca-86fc-46d320b3280b
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent of Russians did not declare themselves as Christian?
|
{
"spans": [
"53.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of Russians did not declare themselves as Christian?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
53.2
|
history_2457
|
12a7f57a-45bb-432b-bbdb-696c81a2936d
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
Where there more people that considered themselves Russian Orthodox of non-Russian Orthodox?
|
{
"spans": [
"Russian Orthodox"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Where there more people that considered themselves Russian Orthodox of non-Russian Orthodox?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
Russian Orthodox
|
history_2457
|
f91047db-b70a-4504-bd73-ef8b4272bc20
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
How many percent more considered themselves to be Russian Orthodox compared to unaffiliated Christian?
|
{
"spans": [
"36.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent more considered themselves to be Russian Orthodox compared to unaffiliated Christian?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
36.9
|
history_2457
|
6d34889c-fa04-419f-890c-ce52a0f59cd0
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
Did more people consider themselves spiritual but not religious or atheist?
|
{
"spans": [
"spiritual but not religious"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did more people consider themselves spiritual but not religious or atheist?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
spiritual but not religious
|
history_2457
|
c6e54664-6d74-4f75-8308-c74a4dae196f
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
Did fewer people consider themselves atheist or Muslim?
|
{
"spans": [
"Muslim"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did fewer people consider themselves atheist or Muslim?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
Muslim
|
history_2457
|
954cbd2a-ad01-4e0c-8bf7-7bc9bc3d279d
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
What was the smallest religious group identified in the study?
|
{
"spans": [
"Tibetan Buddhism"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What was the smallest religious group identified in the study?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
Tibetan Buddhism
|
history_2457
|
7c1a443b-641c-43bf-bf37-289af1cef806
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
Which study labeled the smallest number of Russians as Christian?
|
{
"spans": [
"Arena Atlas"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which study labeled the smallest number of Russians as Christian?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
Arena Atlas
|
history_2457
|
45b133e2-4fa7-4758-ac7a-99e4fa108612
|
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
|
Which group did a study that had the highest percentage of Russians listed as Christians?
|
{
"spans": [
"Russian Public Opinion Research Center"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which group did a study that had the highest percentage of Russians listed as Christians?
Answer based on following passage.
Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Answer:
|
Russian Public Opinion Research Center
|
history_4032
|
a585fdb2-bd36-4bee-a7de-5c82d3aa6b47
|
A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
|
Which person leased the school for a longer time, Margaret Clark or Lucy Soulsby?
|
{
"spans": [
"Lucy Soulsby"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which person leased the school for a longer time, Margaret Clark or Lucy Soulsby?
Answer based on following passage.
A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Answer:
|
Lucy Soulsby
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.