section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 7
388
| answers_spans
dict | template_name
stringclasses 5
values | template
stringclasses 5
values | rendered_input
stringlengths 166
9.94k
| rendered_output
stringlengths 1
388
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_2696
|
40a273ae-ff43-4212-9172-266090ce06bf
|
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
|
How many years did the cost of rhodium exceed the price of gold?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years did the cost of rhodium exceed the price of gold?
Answer based on following passage.
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
Answer:
|
3
|
history_2696
|
167f29a0-2a0a-4f37-af97-0a3ab21a64df
|
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
|
How many years was the price of rhodium lower than gold?
|
{
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years was the price of rhodium lower than gold?
Answer based on following passage.
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
Answer:
|
2
|
history_2696
|
2449edaf-67dd-4d68-b45e-08542ea58829
|
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
|
Which country is the highest exporter of rhodium?
|
{
"spans": [
"South Africa"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which country is the highest exporter of rhodium?
Answer based on following passage.
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
Answer:
|
South Africa
|
history_2696
|
0ce83e4d-0314-4281-b217-89af7425cd80
|
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
|
In 2007, how many more times did rhodium cost than silver compared to gold?
|
{
"spans": [
"442"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: In 2007, how many more times did rhodium cost than silver compared to gold?
Answer based on following passage.
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
Answer:
|
442
|
history_2696
|
e41ea306-c9ab-42a2-aa12-b3247ea3f735
|
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
|
How many dollars per ounce did the price of rhodium fall from it's peak in 2008 to its lowest point?
|
{
"spans": [
"9000"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many dollars per ounce did the price of rhodium fall from it's peak in 2008 to its lowest point?
Answer based on following passage.
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
Answer:
|
9000
|
history_2696
|
632baa2d-5756-49db-87e7-2db3abd32f85
|
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
|
Was the price of rhodium higher in 2010 or in 2013?
|
{
"spans": [
"2010"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Was the price of rhodium higher in 2010 or in 2013?
Answer based on following passage.
The main exporter of rhodium is South Africa (approximately 80% in 2010) followed by Russia. The annual world production is 30 tonnes. The price of rhodium is highly variable. In 2007, rhodium cost approximately eight times more than gold, 450 times more than silver, and 27,250 times more than copper by weight. In 2008, the price briefly rose above $10,000 per ounce ($350,000 per kilogram). The economic slowdown of the 3rd quarter of 2008 pushed rhodium prices sharply back below $1,000 per ounce ($35,000 per kilogram); the price rebounded to $2,750 by early 2010 ($97,000 per kilogram) (more than twice the gold price), but in late 2013, the prices were less than $1000.
Answer:
|
2010
|
history_3621
|
50fbe49e-3be9-4ff4-9652-7837540892c6
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age group makes up most of the population?
|
{
"spans": [
"18 and 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age group makes up most of the population?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
18 and 24
|
history_3621
|
61e3f082-1e88-457d-864c-d6278710cb45
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age group makes up the smallest percentage of the population, under 18 or over 64?
|
{
"spans": [
"over 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age group makes up the smallest percentage of the population, under 18 or over 64?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
over 64
|
history_3621
|
66a9d312-85ba-4293-bc90-1ce91eb9f934
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more males are there than males under the age of 18, per every 100 women?
|
{
"spans": [
"2.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more males are there than males under the age of 18, per every 100 women?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
2.1
|
history_3621
|
a8877592-9a41-4047-9d1f-534de96867eb
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many age groups make up more than 25% of the population?
|
{
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many age groups make up more than 25% of the population?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
2
|
history_3621
|
8eb24533-69b4-4e8a-b64b-217d122a2644
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age groups make up more than 25% of the population?
|
{
"spans": [
"18 and 24",
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age groups make up more than 25% of the population?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
18 and 24, 25 to 44
|
history_3621
|
b779927e-a4bd-4d25-b1c7-2fb3f20ea120
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
What age group makes up the majority of the population?
|
{
"spans": [
"18 and 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What age group makes up the majority of the population?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
18 and 24
|
history_3621
|
7d450776-4c0a-4050-b183-d686f2bf4d1e
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
What percentage of the population is the age group that the median age falls into?
|
{
"spans": [
"32.3%"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What percentage of the population is the age group that the median age falls into?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
32.3%
|
history_3621
|
85ada188-585a-48b1-ba69-afafb6a93881
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the biggest age group compared to the smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"23.6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the biggest age group compared to the smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
23.6
|
history_3621
|
496cf331-ffa6-4937-833d-40662a8d0d49
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the biggest age group compared to the second smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"17"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the biggest age group compared to the second smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
17
|
history_3621
|
d581f7d8-2988-4602-815d-a124b8a0f991
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the second biggest age group compared to the smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"19.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the second biggest age group compared to the smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
19.1
|
history_3621
|
58094ad4-29fd-465c-a7e6-41281cc75711
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the second biggest age group compared to the second smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"12.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the second biggest age group compared to the second smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
12.5
|
history_3621
|
917d3f04-7e7c-43d0-87c9-45e3be7a0cdc
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the two biggest age groups combined compared to the smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"51.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the two biggest age groups combined compared to the smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
51.4
|
history_3621
|
fd63b713-9408-486b-a06a-1d2212f64de5
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the two biggest age groups combined compared to the second smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"44.8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the two biggest age groups combined compared to the second smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
44.8
|
history_3621
|
1ecd9af9-f5ae-432b-81d1-033c88b61ed6
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the two biggest age groups combined compared to the two smallest combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"36.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the two biggest age groups combined compared to the two smallest combined?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
36.1
|
history_3621
|
2327a702-48a0-49b4-8511-1e385dae2afb
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the third biggest age group compared to the smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"7.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the third biggest age group compared to the smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
7.2
|
history_3621
|
e1cad450-5312-4b95-a91f-678b3cb1fbdc
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the third biggest age group compared to the second smallest?
|
{
"spans": [
"0.6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were in the third biggest age group compared to the second smallest?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
0.6
|
history_3621
|
6c27a656-0371-4d2b-9eb9-215f2eaaa61c
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Were more people 45 and over or between 18 and 24?
|
{
"spans": [
"between 18 and 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Were more people 45 and over or between 18 and 24?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
between 18 and 24
|
history_3621
|
f8eae8e4-ed80-4b16-9a25-7c95141e32c9
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Were more people 45 and over or under the age of 18?
|
{
"spans": [
"45 and over"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Were more people 45 and over or under the age of 18?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
45 and over
|
history_3621
|
00d53442-1af4-4b73-b8da-cc9a07a17bd6
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Were more people between 25 to 44 or 45 and older?
|
{
"spans": [
"between 25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Were more people between 25 to 44 or 45 and older?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
between 25 to 44
|
history_3621
|
f18c285f-dc33-4212-9321-0cb6ed5d05b3
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which groups in percent are larger than 15%?
|
{
"spans": [
"under the age of 18",
"18 and 24",
"25 to 44",
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which groups in percent are larger than 15%?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
under the age of 18, 18 and 24, 25 to 44, 45 to 64
|
history_3621
|
d412407e-4b11-424a-8752-c865f7f07b3f
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many in percent weren't under the age of 18?
|
{
"spans": [
"84.7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many in percent weren't under the age of 18?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
84.7
|
history_3621
|
7aa60603-73a2-4257-acf8-34f0a97ba893
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many in percent weren't 18 and 24?
|
{
"spans": [
"67.7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many in percent weren't 18 and 24?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
67.7
|
history_3621
|
d6b9aa06-91cf-4de6-abd6-6bd69f861ff9
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many in percent weren't 25 to 44?
|
{
"spans": [
"72.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many in percent weren't 25 to 44?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
72.2
|
history_3621
|
74935e4a-d04e-469c-92a9-6a7157a65846
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many in percent weren't 45 to 64?
|
{
"spans": [
"84.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many in percent weren't 45 to 64?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
84.1
|
history_3621
|
57f84e03-0eb4-4c69-b009-2dcaa38d8952
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
How many in percent weren't 65 years of age or older?
|
{
"spans": [
"91.3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many in percent weren't 65 years of age or older?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
91.3
|
history_3621
|
d7aa2581-f7a9-4031-8caf-f4c69c92d582
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which gender group is larger: females or males?
|
{
"spans": [
"females"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which gender group is larger: females or males?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
females
|
history_3621
|
4676bb14-4656-4b43-bb34-03e5511c510e
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 18 and 24?
|
{
"spans": [
"18 and 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 18 and 24?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
18 and 24
|
history_3621
|
827d9da7-fbe1-4ed4-a366-fa7bdc3b570e
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age group is smaller: under the age of 18 or 18 and 24?
|
{
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age group is smaller: under the age of 18 or 18 and 24?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
under the age of 18
|
history_3621
|
5fec79d9-c259-43f9-9576-9c20f1814581
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64?
|
{
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
25 to 44
|
history_3621
|
4a0456bb-062a-4e79-8d18-1de6dce8a7f3
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64?
|
{
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
45 to 64
|
history_3621
|
414604a2-e859-4a2c-bf8e-ca1a28445da0
|
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
|
Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 65 years of age or older?
|
{
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 65 years of age or older?
Answer based on following passage.
Arcatas age cohorts are also distorted by a large percentage of college-age students. Only 15.3% of Arcata residents are under the age of 18, while nearly a third (32.3%) fall between ages 18 and 24, and 27.8% are 25 to 44 years old. Among older age cohorts, 15.9% are 45 to 64 years old, and 8.7% were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 26 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.9 males.
Answer:
|
under the age of 18
|
history_2853
|
31d74039-4fba-4ffd-9b8d-f21df2f19528
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of the population were not employed part or full-time?
|
{
"spans": [
"52.18"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of the population were not employed part or full-time?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
52.18
|
history_2853
|
d459b014-cb44-42a5-b5db-c76ae387ddde
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not Christian?
|
{
"spans": [
"52.29"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not Christian?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
52.29
|
history_2853
|
1bee8688-8e6d-4aa2-a606-9167c16317f1
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not Hindu?
|
{
"spans": [
"82.29"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not Hindu?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
82.29
|
history_2853
|
7262b960-8097-4479-94e5-a89eb939dd45
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not Muslim?
|
{
"spans": [
"87.74"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not Muslim?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
87.74
|
history_2853
|
0ae657e7-c7c8-40e7-9d54-c9f72ddffdbe
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not irreligious?
|
{
"spans": [
"90"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not irreligious?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
90
|
history_2853
|
754cc3a4-af17-43b9-81d5-be05847b029a
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not in full-time employment?
|
{
"spans": [
"60.04"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not in full-time employment?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
60.04
|
history_2853
|
e3162e83-1b09-4aab-98c2-5b4bd27b94b8
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not in part-time employment in London?
|
{
"spans": [
"91.38"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not in part-time employment in London?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
91.38
|
history_2853
|
8e51b91c-a6d2-4711-a39f-444f86fece52
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not in full time employment in London?
|
{
"spans": [
"57.36"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not in full time employment in London?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
57.36
|
history_2853
|
3c175fba-62fa-49ad-9bfd-8b78a07f723f
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not owner-occupiers owning their house outright?
|
{
"spans": [
"76.83"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not owner-occupiers owning their house outright?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
76.83
|
history_2853
|
5950e633-5ae1-414f-84e8-57b7585f480c
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not owning with a mortgage?
|
{
"spans": [
"68.67"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not owning with a mortgage?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
68.67
|
history_2853
|
357c1775-4e78-4da4-8485-fd8c75474264
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not in public housing?
|
{
"spans": [
"88.41"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not in public housing?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
88.41
|
history_2853
|
e9fc9201-a4af-49be-a31e-b55ed4d7d1ba
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people were not renting from a housing association?
|
{
"spans": [
"86.71"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people were not renting from a housing association?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
86.71
|
history_2853
|
12995977-b413-4918-9155-102a802ceac5
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many more females were there than males?
|
{
"spans": [
"7852"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more females were there than males?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
7852
|
history_2853
|
018f396f-f7a1-448c-87ea-d7fa2dbaab55
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
What was the second most common religion?
|
{
"spans": [
"Hindu"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What was the second most common religion?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
Hindu
|
history_2853
|
9a5dc58b-890f-4e3b-8433-6a1c8d62880e
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
What was the third most common religion?
|
{
"spans": [
"Muslim"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What was the third most common religion?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
Muslim
|
history_2853
|
5d782b1b-37fe-465d-9db2-221090019d4d
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent more identified as Christian compared with Hindu and Muslim?
|
{
"spans": [
"17.74"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent more identified as Christian compared with Hindu and Muslim?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
17.74
|
history_2853
|
151ab97a-13e0-44b3-b563-a607acb265db
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people identified as either Hindu, Muslim or irreligion?
|
{
"spans": [
"39.97"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people identified as either Hindu, Muslim or irreligion?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
39.97
|
history_2853
|
09786803-32e2-4887-aa02-84e81aacb7fa
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
Did more people identify as Christian or as Hindu, Muslim and irreligion combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"Christian"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did more people identify as Christian or as Hindu, Muslim and irreligion combined?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
Christian
|
history_2853
|
6e74342b-923b-4d22-a6cd-275cb43c342c
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people less were either full or part time employed compared with the London average?
|
{
"spans": [
"3.44"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people less were either full or part time employed compared with the London average?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
3.44
|
history_2853
|
48130aa8-b39c-41cf-8a2a-8eaee96cdac7
|
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
|
How many percent of people either owned their own home or owned their home with a mortgage?
|
{
"spans": [
"54.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of people either owned their own home or owned their home with a mortgage?
Answer based on following passage.
The United Kingdom Census 2001 revealed that the borough had a population of 263,464 - of whom 127,806 were male, and 135,658 female. Of those stating a choice, 47.71% described themselves as Christian, 17.71% as Hindu, 12.26% as Muslim and 10% as having irreligion. Of the population, 39.96% were in full-time employment and 7.86% in part-time employment - compared to a London average of 42.64% and 8.62%, respectively. Residents were predominantly owner-occupiers, with 23.17% owning their house outright, and a further 31.33% owning with a mortgage. 10.59% were in public housing, with a further 13.29% renting from a housing association, or other registered social landlord.
Answer:
|
54.5
|
history_3816
|
5985fddb-c99a-4154-ab4a-0562fbdcbf07
|
After a gradual 5-year recovery to an intraday high of 2,239.51 on October 31, 2007, the highest reached since February 16, 2001, the index corrected below the 2,000 level in early 2008 amid the Late-2000s recession, the United States housing bubble and the Financial crisis of 2007-2010. Panic focusing on the failure of the investment banking industry culminated in a loss of more than 10% on September 29, 2008, subsequently plunging the index firmly into bear market territory. The NASDAQ-100, with much of the broader market, experienced a Limit down open on October 24 and reached a 6-year intraday low of 1,018 on November 20, 2008.
|
How many points did the index drop between its high in October 2007 and its low in 2008?
|
{
"spans": [
"1221.51"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many points did the index drop between its high in October 2007 and its low in 2008?
Answer based on following passage.
After a gradual 5-year recovery to an intraday high of 2,239.51 on October 31, 2007, the highest reached since February 16, 2001, the index corrected below the 2,000 level in early 2008 amid the Late-2000s recession, the United States housing bubble and the Financial crisis of 2007-2010. Panic focusing on the failure of the investment banking industry culminated in a loss of more than 10% on September 29, 2008, subsequently plunging the index firmly into bear market territory. The NASDAQ-100, with much of the broader market, experienced a Limit down open on October 24 and reached a 6-year intraday low of 1,018 on November 20, 2008.
Answer:
|
1221.51
|
history_3816
|
c17d2a18-d6be-42f0-a08f-5f1b625708eb
|
After a gradual 5-year recovery to an intraday high of 2,239.51 on October 31, 2007, the highest reached since February 16, 2001, the index corrected below the 2,000 level in early 2008 amid the Late-2000s recession, the United States housing bubble and the Financial crisis of 2007-2010. Panic focusing on the failure of the investment banking industry culminated in a loss of more than 10% on September 29, 2008, subsequently plunging the index firmly into bear market territory. The NASDAQ-100, with much of the broader market, experienced a Limit down open on October 24 and reached a 6-year intraday low of 1,018 on November 20, 2008.
|
How many months passed between the index high and its 6-year intraday low?
|
{
"spans": [
"13"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many months passed between the index high and its 6-year intraday low?
Answer based on following passage.
After a gradual 5-year recovery to an intraday high of 2,239.51 on October 31, 2007, the highest reached since February 16, 2001, the index corrected below the 2,000 level in early 2008 amid the Late-2000s recession, the United States housing bubble and the Financial crisis of 2007-2010. Panic focusing on the failure of the investment banking industry culminated in a loss of more than 10% on September 29, 2008, subsequently plunging the index firmly into bear market territory. The NASDAQ-100, with much of the broader market, experienced a Limit down open on October 24 and reached a 6-year intraday low of 1,018 on November 20, 2008.
Answer:
|
13
|
history_3816
|
b81c756e-041e-4c86-b987-2bec719f640f
|
After a gradual 5-year recovery to an intraday high of 2,239.51 on October 31, 2007, the highest reached since February 16, 2001, the index corrected below the 2,000 level in early 2008 amid the Late-2000s recession, the United States housing bubble and the Financial crisis of 2007-2010. Panic focusing on the failure of the investment banking industry culminated in a loss of more than 10% on September 29, 2008, subsequently plunging the index firmly into bear market territory. The NASDAQ-100, with much of the broader market, experienced a Limit down open on October 24 and reached a 6-year intraday low of 1,018 on November 20, 2008.
|
What three events occurred as the index corrected?
|
{
"spans": [
"Late-2000s recession",
"United States housing bubble",
"Financial crisis of 2007-2010"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What three events occurred as the index corrected?
Answer based on following passage.
After a gradual 5-year recovery to an intraday high of 2,239.51 on October 31, 2007, the highest reached since February 16, 2001, the index corrected below the 2,000 level in early 2008 amid the Late-2000s recession, the United States housing bubble and the Financial crisis of 2007-2010. Panic focusing on the failure of the investment banking industry culminated in a loss of more than 10% on September 29, 2008, subsequently plunging the index firmly into bear market territory. The NASDAQ-100, with much of the broader market, experienced a Limit down open on October 24 and reached a 6-year intraday low of 1,018 on November 20, 2008.
Answer:
|
Late-2000s recession, United States housing bubble, Financial crisis of 2007-2010
|
history_4053
|
d7515bda-bb4a-4f8d-8467-b4a1ac1848b8
|
On 26 August 1992, Australians Nic Feteris and Glenn Singleman climbed Great Trango and then BASE jumping from an elevation of 5,955 metres (19,537 ft) from the Northeast Face (on the other side of the Norwegian Pillar from the 1,340 metre East Face wall), landing on the northern side of the Dunge Glacier at an altitude of 4,200 metres (13,779 ft). This was the highest starting elevation for a BASE jump on record. The world record for a BASE jump starting elevation is held by Valery Rozov for the jump from a point 7,220m (23,680 ft) from Everest on 28 May 2013. Glenn Singleman and partner Heather Swan previously held the record, for their jump from 6604 meters (21,667 ft) from Meru Peak in northern India on 23 May 2006. On 10 August 2013 Andrey Lebedev and Vladimir Murzaev performed a base jump from the same location as Feteris and Singleman on a low budget and with little fanfare.
|
How many feet in distance did Nic Feteris and Glenn Singleman travel before landing in their BASE jump?
|
{
"spans": [
"5758"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many feet in distance did Nic Feteris and Glenn Singleman travel before landing in their BASE jump?
Answer based on following passage.
On 26 August 1992, Australians Nic Feteris and Glenn Singleman climbed Great Trango and then BASE jumping from an elevation of 5,955 metres (19,537 ft) from the Northeast Face (on the other side of the Norwegian Pillar from the 1,340 metre East Face wall), landing on the northern side of the Dunge Glacier at an altitude of 4,200 metres (13,779 ft). This was the highest starting elevation for a BASE jump on record. The world record for a BASE jump starting elevation is held by Valery Rozov for the jump from a point 7,220m (23,680 ft) from Everest on 28 May 2013. Glenn Singleman and partner Heather Swan previously held the record, for their jump from 6604 meters (21,667 ft) from Meru Peak in northern India on 23 May 2006. On 10 August 2013 Andrey Lebedev and Vladimir Murzaev performed a base jump from the same location as Feteris and Singleman on a low budget and with little fanfare.
Answer:
|
5758
|
history_3218
|
df468eab-ae31-458b-a9fb-815a5b51d644
|
According to Digby Smith the French lost 600 killed and wounded out of the 13,300 infantry and 1,700 cavalry that were engaged in the action. The Russians lost 2,400 men and nine guns out of the 3,700 soldiers and 24 guns that were present. Captured were General-Leutnant Olsufiev and General-major Prince Poltaratsky. Francis Loraine Petre credited Olsufiev with 4,000 infantry and 24 guns of which 1,600-1,700 men and 15 guns escaped. George Nafziger cited several sources including one that listed Russian losses as 1,400 dead and 1,894 captured including three generals and 21 guns, with 1,900 troops getting away. French losses were estimated at 200-600. David G. Chandler stated that French losses were only about 200 men and that only 1,000 out of 5,000 Russians escaped death or capture. Kornilov assumed command of the remnant of IX Corps. Its approximately 1,500 survivors were grouped into three or four temporary battalions. This unlucky outfit suffered 600 more casualties and lost all their cannons at the Battle of Vauchamps on 14 February.
|
How many total infantry and cavalry were left after 600 were lost?
|
{
"spans": [
"14400"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many total infantry and cavalry were left after 600 were lost?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Digby Smith the French lost 600 killed and wounded out of the 13,300 infantry and 1,700 cavalry that were engaged in the action. The Russians lost 2,400 men and nine guns out of the 3,700 soldiers and 24 guns that were present. Captured were General-Leutnant Olsufiev and General-major Prince Poltaratsky. Francis Loraine Petre credited Olsufiev with 4,000 infantry and 24 guns of which 1,600-1,700 men and 15 guns escaped. George Nafziger cited several sources including one that listed Russian losses as 1,400 dead and 1,894 captured including three generals and 21 guns, with 1,900 troops getting away. French losses were estimated at 200-600. David G. Chandler stated that French losses were only about 200 men and that only 1,000 out of 5,000 Russians escaped death or capture. Kornilov assumed command of the remnant of IX Corps. Its approximately 1,500 survivors were grouped into three or four temporary battalions. This unlucky outfit suffered 600 more casualties and lost all their cannons at the Battle of Vauchamps on 14 February.
Answer:
|
14400
|
history_3969
|
61c1ed87-0a5e-4aeb-bd86-679d89b5cb44
|
Christopher Columbus landed on the island on December 5, 1492, which the native Taíno people had inhabited since the 7th century. The Captaincy General of Santo Domingo became the site of the first permanent European colonization of the Americas in the Americas, the oldest continuously inhabited city, and the first seat of the Spanish colonial rule in the New World. After more than three hundred years of Spanish rule the Dominican people Republic of Spanish Haiti. The leader of the independence movement José Núñez de Cáceres, intended the Dominican nation to unite with the country of Gran Colombia, but no longer under Spains custody the newly independent Dominicans were Unification of Hispaniola. Independence came 22 years later after victory in the Dominican War of Independence in 1844. Over the next 72 years the Dominican Republic experienced mostly civil war and a Spanish occupation of the Dominican Republic (but Spain had not come to take away its independence) before permanently ousting Spanish rule during the Dominican Restoration War of 1863–1865. A United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1916–24) lasted eight years between 1916 and 1924, and a subsequent calm and prosperous six-year period under Horacio Vásquez was followed by the dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo until 1961. A civil war in 1965, the countrys last, was ended by United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1965–66) and was followed by the authoritarian rule of Joaquín Balaguer (1966–1978 & 1986–1996), the rules of Antonio Guzmán Fernández (1972–1978) & Salvador Jorge Blanco (1982–1986). Since 1996, the Dominican Republic has moved toward representative democracy and has been led by Leonel Fernández for most of the time since 1996. Danilo Medina, the Dominican Republics current president, succeeded Fernandez in 2012, winning 51% of the electoral vote over his opponent ex-president Hipólito Mejía.
|
How many years in total did the United States occupy the Dominican Republic?
|
{
"spans": [
"9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years in total did the United States occupy the Dominican Republic?
Answer based on following passage.
Christopher Columbus landed on the island on December 5, 1492, which the native Taíno people had inhabited since the 7th century. The Captaincy General of Santo Domingo became the site of the first permanent European colonization of the Americas in the Americas, the oldest continuously inhabited city, and the first seat of the Spanish colonial rule in the New World. After more than three hundred years of Spanish rule the Dominican people Republic of Spanish Haiti. The leader of the independence movement José Núñez de Cáceres, intended the Dominican nation to unite with the country of Gran Colombia, but no longer under Spains custody the newly independent Dominicans were Unification of Hispaniola. Independence came 22 years later after victory in the Dominican War of Independence in 1844. Over the next 72 years the Dominican Republic experienced mostly civil war and a Spanish occupation of the Dominican Republic (but Spain had not come to take away its independence) before permanently ousting Spanish rule during the Dominican Restoration War of 1863–1865. A United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1916–24) lasted eight years between 1916 and 1924, and a subsequent calm and prosperous six-year period under Horacio Vásquez was followed by the dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo until 1961. A civil war in 1965, the countrys last, was ended by United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1965–66) and was followed by the authoritarian rule of Joaquín Balaguer (1966–1978 & 1986–1996), the rules of Antonio Guzmán Fernández (1972–1978) & Salvador Jorge Blanco (1982–1986). Since 1996, the Dominican Republic has moved toward representative democracy and has been led by Leonel Fernández for most of the time since 1996. Danilo Medina, the Dominican Republics current president, succeeded Fernandez in 2012, winning 51% of the electoral vote over his opponent ex-president Hipólito Mejía.
Answer:
|
9
|
history_2259
|
b49f6b53-cea5-4e51-858c-0ba67dbf4c04
|
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
|
Which country had a higher Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population, South Korea or Italy?
|
{
"spans": [
"Italy"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which country had a higher Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population, South Korea or Italy?
Answer based on following passage.
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
Answer:
|
Italy
|
history_2259
|
9eb913b2-815d-437c-aa53-6be9ac59344f
|
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
|
Which country had a lower Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population, South Korea or Italy?
|
{
"spans": [
"South Korea"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which country had a lower Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population, South Korea or Italy?
Answer based on following passage.
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
Answer:
|
South Korea
|
history_2259
|
2fa64e43-b5de-410f-b725-e0dd01f9f04f
|
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
|
Which country had a higher Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population, Denmark or Mexico?
|
{
"spans": [
"Mexico"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which country had a higher Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population, Denmark or Mexico?
Answer based on following passage.
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
Answer:
|
Mexico
|
history_2259
|
eb48d77e-2211-4741-863d-826854ebca57
|
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
|
Was the pre-tax Gini index in the United States in 2008-2009 lower or higher than the after-tax Gini index?
|
{
"spans": [
"higher"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Was the pre-tax Gini index in the United States in 2008-2009 lower or higher than the after-tax Gini index?
Answer based on following passage.
The difference in Gini indices between Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, on after-taxes and transfers basis, is significantly narrower. For OECD countries, over 2008–2009 period, Gini coefficient on pre-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.34 and 0.53, with South Korea the lowest and Italy the highest. Gini coefficient on after-taxes and transfers basis for total population ranged between 0.25 and 0.48, with Denmark the lowest and Mexico the highest. For United States, the country with the largest population in OECD countries, the pre-tax Gini index was 0.49, and after-tax Gini index was 0.38, in 2008–2009. The OECD averages for total population in OECD countries was 0.46 for pre-tax income Gini index and 0.31 for after-tax income Gini Index. Taxes and social spending that were in place in 2008–2009 period in OECD countries significantly lowered effective income inequality, and in general, "European countries—especially Nordic and Continental welfare states—achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries."
Answer:
|
higher
|
history_4075
|
320bf02a-dd92-46eb-ad3e-d9d215bb1b0e
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and marginal workers combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"552"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and marginal workers combined?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
552
|
history_4075
|
5cadd7e6-5930-4691-8e32-ba5e8689f43f
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and marginal cultivators combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"1508"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and marginal cultivators combined?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
1508
|
history_4075
|
7be7cdcb-5293-40af-afe4-36b21f245b24
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and marginal agricultural labourers combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"1215"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and marginal agricultural labourers combined?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
1215
|
history_4075
|
de7cb12e-bb34-4af9-9600-7b8fd7d500dc
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and those in house hold industries combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"886"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more main agricultural labourers were there compared to cultivators and those in house hold industries combined?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
886
|
history_4075
|
40461b9a-e458-40a0-b74f-f0b9dd22f393
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many cultivators, main agricultural labourers, and marginal workers were there in total?
|
{
"spans": [
"3518"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many cultivators, main agricultural labourers, and marginal workers were there in total?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
3518
|
history_4075
|
c0729192-278d-40ba-b04c-9ac78458903f
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many cultivators, main agricultural labourers, marginal cultivators, and marginal workers were there in total?
|
{
"spans": [
"3533"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many cultivators, main agricultural labourers, marginal cultivators, and marginal workers were there in total?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
3533
|
history_4075
|
0650a746-0b7e-40aa-b4a1-fa6bd4c19506
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many cultivators, main agricultural labourers, marginal cultivators, marginal agricultural labourers, and marginal workers were there in total?
|
{
"spans": [
"3841"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many cultivators, main agricultural labourers, marginal cultivators, marginal agricultural labourers, and marginal workers were there in total?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
3841
|
history_4075
|
29f949eb-710e-4dc5-8b73-bc88bfe214a4
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
Which categories had fewer than 100 workers?
|
{
"spans": [
"marginal cultivators",
"marginal workers in household industries"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which categories had fewer than 100 workers?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
marginal cultivators, marginal workers in household industries
|
history_4075
|
a2d681d6-6425-4a2d-b2e9-8784fd3cd527
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
Which categories had between 300 and 800 workers?
|
{
"spans": [
"cultivators",
"house hold industries",
"marginal agricultural labourers",
"other marginal workers"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which categories had between 300 and 800 workers?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
cultivators, house hold industries, marginal agricultural labourers, other marginal workers
|
history_4075
|
6e738bd8-4eff-402e-9921-9e55088b943d
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
Which categories had 900 or more workers?
|
{
"spans": [
"marginal workers",
"main agricultural labourers",
"other workers"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which categories had 900 or more workers?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
marginal workers, main agricultural labourers, other workers
|
history_4075
|
bf05cb41-4587-47e0-ae5f-f0801b153f13
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many more marginal workers were there compared to marginal cultivators and cultivators combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"444"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more marginal workers were there compared to marginal cultivators and cultivators combined?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
444
|
history_4075
|
f9c9e4b2-1fd6-4b74-b5ba-33da5c611687
|
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
|
How many more marginal workers were there compared to marginal cultivators, marginal workers in household industries, and cultivators combined?
|
{
"spans": [
"387"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more marginal workers were there compared to marginal cultivators, marginal workers in household industries, and cultivators combined?
Answer based on following passage.
According to 2011 census of India, Gobichettipalayam had a population of 60,279 with a sex-ratio of 1,062 females for every 1,000 males, much above the national average of 929. A total of 4,669 were under the age of six, constituting 2,364 males and 2,305 females. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes accounted for 10.74% and .08% of the population respectively. The average literacy of the city was 78.52%, compared to the national average of 72.99%. The city had a total of 17064 households. There were a total of 25,225 workers, comprising 512 cultivators, 2,035 main agricultural labourers, 637 in house hold industries, 21,070 other workers, 971 marginal workers, 15 marginal cultivators, 308 marginal agricultural labourers, 57 marginal workers in household industries and 591 other marginal workers.
Answer:
|
387
|
history_2703
|
01796c2e-fd2b-4413-8275-1fa7e4735af6
|
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
|
How many more kilograms of silver was seized than gold?
|
{
"spans": [
"15824.01"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more kilograms of silver was seized than gold?
Answer based on following passage.
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
Answer:
|
15824.01
|
history_2703
|
d6dde0df-7cfd-4218-afdc-6b01715dd92b
|
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
|
How many more kilograms of platinum was seized than pearls?
|
{
"spans": [
"1400"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more kilograms of platinum was seized than pearls?
Answer based on following passage.
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
Answer:
|
1400
|
history_2703
|
37797cc8-6f0c-4126-9b24-86d4a06d8475
|
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
|
How many more carats of diamonds was seized than brilliants?
|
{
"spans": [
"10946.75"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more carats of diamonds was seized than brilliants?
Answer based on following passage.
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
Answer:
|
10946.75
|
history_2703
|
e44d9ac9-7fb0-4944-a7d1-63b7a98bb238
|
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
|
How many more kilograms of silver was seized than pearls?
|
{
"spans": [
"18619.69"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more kilograms of silver was seized than pearls?
Answer based on following passage.
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
Answer:
|
18619.69
|
history_2703
|
6a964c43-7477-4c7d-b266-7541d009e64e
|
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
|
How many more kilograms of gold was seized than pearls?
|
{
"spans": [
"2795.68"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more kilograms of gold was seized than pearls?
Answer based on following passage.
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
Answer:
|
2795.68
|
history_2703
|
1048f252-a3f3-4e47-a6a9-5c343b0d1688
|
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
|
How many total kilograms of precious metals were seized?
|
{
"spans": [
"23157.37"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many total kilograms of precious metals were seized?
Answer based on following passage.
The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by August Frank memorandum and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain, or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market.
Answer:
|
23157.37
|
history_3050
|
892ce088-b426-48f4-8673-95609d4a4f63
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
What year was vitamin E supplement use the highest by female health professionals?
|
{
"spans": [
"1998"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year was vitamin E supplement use the highest by female health professionals?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
1998
|
history_3050
|
75a733b0-c23e-4375-b9b6-8ac055724927
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many percent higher was Vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals in 2006 over 1986?
|
{
"spans": [
"3.7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent higher was Vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals in 2006 over 1986?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
3.7
|
history_3050
|
f96f9719-3939-4c68-8121-852927ae01b0
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
What gender of health professionals used vitamin E supplements the least each year?
|
{
"spans": [
"female"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What gender of health professionals used vitamin E supplements the least each year?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
female
|
history_3050
|
7bd3348b-2cd8-4a90-a575-7a4b47acded2
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many total percent more did male health professionals use vitamin E supplements?
|
{
"spans": [
"18.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many total percent more did male health professionals use vitamin E supplements?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
18.4
|
history_3050
|
2633c9cf-aea4-4a8f-adae-f902c53eb0b7
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
What year was vitamin E supplements used more for both male and female health professionals?
|
{
"spans": [
"1998"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year was vitamin E supplements used more for both male and female health professionals?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
1998
|
history_3050
|
17ea37d2-19c2-41ed-8df2-c62ddd6a04ae
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many percent did usage of Vitamin E decrease in the four years after 2002?
|
{
"spans": [
"24.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent did usage of Vitamin E decrease in the four years after 2002?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
24.5
|
history_3050
|
bfd8d7e5-7d41-48ea-8d7d-4d82b02ac071
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many percent did Vitamin E use increase from 1986 to 1998?
|
{
"spans": [
"30.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent did Vitamin E use increase from 1986 to 1998?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
30.1
|
history_3050
|
bbf15ad0-1006-40c5-b171-a0dc65cba64a
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many percent more was the increase from 1986 to 1998 than the decrease from 2002 to 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"5.6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent more was the increase from 1986 to 1998 than the decrease from 2002 to 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
5.6
|
history_3050
|
337efe8e-3ef7-4eaa-b9e1-b1b1f0c22297
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many percent higher was the male professional recommendation than the female's in 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"4.7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent higher was the male professional recommendation than the female's in 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
4.7
|
history_3050
|
ac4afdbc-b553-46c1-8ece-a4545bce9fc2
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
What was the highest percentage of Vitamin E use by either male or female health professionals?
|
{
"spans": [
"52.0%"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What was the highest percentage of Vitamin E use by either male or female health professionals?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
52.0%
|
history_3050
|
6d099618-7e6b-44eb-a648-4b8c6f828f3a
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
Which year had the highest difference between male and female doctor recommendation of Vitamin E?
|
{
"spans": [
"1998"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which year had the highest difference between male and female doctor recommendation of Vitamin E?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
1998
|
history_3050
|
ab4f7336-fa75-4785-8c24-cd70c98a0c11
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
By how many percentage points did the female and male professional usage of Vitamin E differ in 1986?
|
{
"spans": [
"2.8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: By how many percentage points did the female and male professional usage of Vitamin E differ in 1986?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
2.8
|
history_3050
|
3c076fc4-d144-4236-a907-bd7ff6b7d04b
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
From 2007-2001, which two vitamin use changed by more than 50%?
|
{
"spans": [
"Vitamin E",
"vitamin D"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: From 2007-2001, which two vitamin use changed by more than 50%?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
Vitamin E, vitamin D
|
history_3050
|
87f09999-86d6-4c3f-8f9f-7b392ec23e18
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many years saw over 44% of female health professionals using a vitamin E supplement?
|
{
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years saw over 44% of female health professionals using a vitamin E supplement?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
2
|
history_3050
|
967a0cb5-33e3-4481-a061-853a92fbebfa
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
Which group saw year periods where vitamin E supplement use was 49% or above, male health professionals or female health professionals?
|
{
"spans": [
"male health professionals"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which group saw year periods where vitamin E supplement use was 49% or above, male health professionals or female health professionals?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
male health professionals
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.