section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 7
388
| answers_spans
dict | template_name
stringclasses 5
values | template
stringclasses 5
values | rendered_input
stringlengths 166
9.94k
| rendered_output
stringlengths 1
388
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_3050
|
9b0ec606-8b06-4d93-873e-b748d065a8c8
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
Which vitamin supplement was the most used by those in the military during 2007-2011, vitamin E, vitamin C, or vitamin D?
|
{
"spans": [
"vitamin D"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which vitamin supplement was the most used by those in the military during 2007-2011, vitamin E, vitamin C, or vitamin D?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
vitamin D
|
history_3050
|
5c6153a6-f0aa-45e4-b3a7-3bacf9869c76
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many percent was the decrease in 2006 from 2002 of the female health professionals using a vitamin E supplement?
|
{
"spans": [
"24.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent was the decrease in 2006 from 2002 of the female health professionals using a vitamin E supplement?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
24.5
|
history_3050
|
07969ebd-3cb3-4ef9-9f74-5351a94bfb93
|
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
|
How many years did a 50% decrease of vitamin E sales volume happen?
|
{
"spans": [
"6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years did a 50% decrease of vitamin E sales volume happen?
Answer based on following passage.
In the United States vitamin E supplement use by female health professionals was 16.1% in 1986, 46.2% in 1998, 44.3% in 2002, but decreased to 19.8% in 2006. Similarly, for male health professionals, rates for same years were 18.9%, 52.0%, 49.4% and 24.5%. The authors theorized that declining use in these populations may have due to publications of studies that showed either no benefits or negative consequences from vitamin E supplements. Within the US military services, vitamin prescriptions written for active, reserve and retired military, and their dependents, were tracked over years 2007-2011. Vitamin E prescriptions decreased by 53% while vitamin C remained constant and vitamin D increased by 454%. A report on vitamin E sales volume in the US documented a 50% decrease between 2000 and 2006, with a cause attributed to a meta-analysis that had concluded that high-dosage vitamin E increased all-cause mortality.
Answer:
|
6
|
nfl_3026
|
19533340-f4f6-447b-9308-b9d561ee3cbc
|
Justin Tucker made a 52-yard field goal with 5:08 left in overtime to give the Baltimore Ravens a 23-20 victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers on Thursday night. Tucker tied it with 3 seconds to go in regulation after Pittsburgh's Josh Scobee missed a pair of kicks that would have given the Steelers some cushion. Tucker then won it in the extra period after the Steelers failed to convert a pair of fourth downs in Baltimore territory. The Steelers defense had another stellar outing, sacking Joe Flacco five times and forcing two turnovers. Michael Vick threw for 124 yards and a score and avoided committing any turnovers while starting in place of the injured Ben Roethlisberger. All helped lead the team to a 20-7 lead early in the third quarter. However, the Steelers offense stalled after, and Baltimore took advantage dropping the team to 2-2. Antonio Brown's 5/50 receiving streak was broken after 35 consecutive games. He finished with 5 receptions, but missed the 50-yard mark by 8 yards.
|
How many field goal attempts (kicks) were made, successful or not?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many field goal attempts (kicks) were made, successful or not?
Answer based on following passage.
Justin Tucker made a 52-yard field goal with 5:08 left in overtime to give the Baltimore Ravens a 23-20 victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers on Thursday night. Tucker tied it with 3 seconds to go in regulation after Pittsburgh's Josh Scobee missed a pair of kicks that would have given the Steelers some cushion. Tucker then won it in the extra period after the Steelers failed to convert a pair of fourth downs in Baltimore territory. The Steelers defense had another stellar outing, sacking Joe Flacco five times and forcing two turnovers. Michael Vick threw for 124 yards and a score and avoided committing any turnovers while starting in place of the injured Ben Roethlisberger. All helped lead the team to a 20-7 lead early in the third quarter. However, the Steelers offense stalled after, and Baltimore took advantage dropping the team to 2-2. Antonio Brown's 5/50 receiving streak was broken after 35 consecutive games. He finished with 5 receptions, but missed the 50-yard mark by 8 yards.
Answer:
|
3
|
nfl_3026
|
b09e2cb4-004a-4b38-a733-f1770a4274ca
|
Justin Tucker made a 52-yard field goal with 5:08 left in overtime to give the Baltimore Ravens a 23-20 victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers on Thursday night. Tucker tied it with 3 seconds to go in regulation after Pittsburgh's Josh Scobee missed a pair of kicks that would have given the Steelers some cushion. Tucker then won it in the extra period after the Steelers failed to convert a pair of fourth downs in Baltimore territory. The Steelers defense had another stellar outing, sacking Joe Flacco five times and forcing two turnovers. Michael Vick threw for 124 yards and a score and avoided committing any turnovers while starting in place of the injured Ben Roethlisberger. All helped lead the team to a 20-7 lead early in the third quarter. However, the Steelers offense stalled after, and Baltimore took advantage dropping the team to 2-2. Antonio Brown's 5/50 receiving streak was broken after 35 consecutive games. He finished with 5 receptions, but missed the 50-yard mark by 8 yards.
|
How many points did the Raven's win by?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many points did the Raven's win by?
Answer based on following passage.
Justin Tucker made a 52-yard field goal with 5:08 left in overtime to give the Baltimore Ravens a 23-20 victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers on Thursday night. Tucker tied it with 3 seconds to go in regulation after Pittsburgh's Josh Scobee missed a pair of kicks that would have given the Steelers some cushion. Tucker then won it in the extra period after the Steelers failed to convert a pair of fourth downs in Baltimore territory. The Steelers defense had another stellar outing, sacking Joe Flacco five times and forcing two turnovers. Michael Vick threw for 124 yards and a score and avoided committing any turnovers while starting in place of the injured Ben Roethlisberger. All helped lead the team to a 20-7 lead early in the third quarter. However, the Steelers offense stalled after, and Baltimore took advantage dropping the team to 2-2. Antonio Brown's 5/50 receiving streak was broken after 35 consecutive games. He finished with 5 receptions, but missed the 50-yard mark by 8 yards.
Answer:
|
3
|
nfl_3026
|
02c0f2c2-80c8-45ae-946e-f36a6399365e
|
Justin Tucker made a 52-yard field goal with 5:08 left in overtime to give the Baltimore Ravens a 23-20 victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers on Thursday night. Tucker tied it with 3 seconds to go in regulation after Pittsburgh's Josh Scobee missed a pair of kicks that would have given the Steelers some cushion. Tucker then won it in the extra period after the Steelers failed to convert a pair of fourth downs in Baltimore territory. The Steelers defense had another stellar outing, sacking Joe Flacco five times and forcing two turnovers. Michael Vick threw for 124 yards and a score and avoided committing any turnovers while starting in place of the injured Ben Roethlisberger. All helped lead the team to a 20-7 lead early in the third quarter. However, the Steelers offense stalled after, and Baltimore took advantage dropping the team to 2-2. Antonio Brown's 5/50 receiving streak was broken after 35 consecutive games. He finished with 5 receptions, but missed the 50-yard mark by 8 yards.
|
How many receiving yards did Antonio Brown have?
|
{
"spans": [
"42"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many receiving yards did Antonio Brown have?
Answer based on following passage.
Justin Tucker made a 52-yard field goal with 5:08 left in overtime to give the Baltimore Ravens a 23-20 victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers on Thursday night. Tucker tied it with 3 seconds to go in regulation after Pittsburgh's Josh Scobee missed a pair of kicks that would have given the Steelers some cushion. Tucker then won it in the extra period after the Steelers failed to convert a pair of fourth downs in Baltimore territory. The Steelers defense had another stellar outing, sacking Joe Flacco five times and forcing two turnovers. Michael Vick threw for 124 yards and a score and avoided committing any turnovers while starting in place of the injured Ben Roethlisberger. All helped lead the team to a 20-7 lead early in the third quarter. However, the Steelers offense stalled after, and Baltimore took advantage dropping the team to 2-2. Antonio Brown's 5/50 receiving streak was broken after 35 consecutive games. He finished with 5 receptions, but missed the 50-yard mark by 8 yards.
Answer:
|
42
|
history_3102
|
916a10d5-18e5-4fee-ab4b-06778caccc5e
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many more AMX-13 tanks than Sherman tanks did the agreement call for?
|
{
"spans": [
"80"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more AMX-13 tanks than Sherman tanks did the agreement call for?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
80
|
history_3102
|
c5a6ea5d-960f-4f9e-9210-63c23a62c1d5
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
What items were signed for in the agreement?
|
{
"spans": [
"Dassault Mystère IV jets",
"AMX-13 tanks",
"Sherman tanks",
"Obusier de 155 mm"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What items were signed for in the agreement?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
Dassault Mystère IV jets, AMX-13 tanks, Sherman tanks, Obusier de 155 mm
|
history_3102
|
606acc37-0dc3-4bce-a0b5-50cacc45d825
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many Mystère were ordered in total, between the agreement and those already on order?
|
{
"spans": [
"125"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many Mystère were ordered in total, between the agreement and those already on order?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
125
|
history_3102
|
6023358f-87b3-49d5-a370-fe3c9ccf2177
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
Who negotiated the agreement?
|
{
"spans": [
"Dayan",
"Shimon Peres"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Who negotiated the agreement?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
Dayan, Shimon Peres
|
history_3102
|
4e95e3c7-2684-4891-85ee-f7474c5348c7
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many Sherman tanks were ordered in total from June to September 1956?
|
{
"spans": [
"140"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many Sherman tanks were ordered in total from June to September 1956?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
140
|
history_3102
|
5c58b321-e016-415c-9853-a16c1b1dda39
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
Which items had more ordered in September 1956?
|
{
"spans": [
"Sherman tanks",
"half-tracks",
"6x6 trucks"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which items had more ordered in September 1956?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
Sherman tanks, half-tracks, 6x6 trucks
|
history_3102
|
2c759ce7-5ad6-4b63-847d-700e267b47f3
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
Which two items had the same number ordered in September 1956?
|
{
"spans": [
"half-tracks",
"6x6 trucks"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which two items had the same number ordered in September 1956?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
half-tracks, 6x6 trucks
|
history_3102
|
66a520a0-9834-43ec-a5e4-59f32487cb5b
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
At the end of September 1956,which item was more ordered - Sherman tanks, or Dassault Mystère IV jets?
|
{
"spans": [
"Sherman tanks"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: At the end of September 1956,which item was more ordered - Sherman tanks, or Dassault Mystère IV jets?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
Sherman tanks
|
history_3102
|
da5f22e4-c5db-4d25-897b-30d0eb8eaa8a
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many days after an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks was a $80 million deal was agreed?
|
{
"spans": [
"227"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many days after an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks was a $80 million deal was agreed?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
227
|
history_3102
|
99706c3d-b479-4be2-a7d4-93bf02512e0c
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many total Sherman tanks were ordered?
|
{
"spans": [
"140"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many total Sherman tanks were ordered?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
140
|
history_3102
|
c745fcc1-5aad-4f69-bce4-f21500c3ad41
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many total Mystere were ordered?
|
{
"spans": [
"125"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many total Mystere were ordered?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
125
|
history_3102
|
436c2379-5121-4c7a-b4c8-b40b94f13b02
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many months after a $80 million deal was agreed was more equipment added?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many months after a $80 million deal was agreed was more equipment added?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
3
|
history_3102
|
00a3312d-ee28-4dbd-b653-3e60c29cb89b
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
On which date was the most AMX-13 tanks agreed for?
|
{
"spans": [
"24 June 1956"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: On which date was the most AMX-13 tanks agreed for?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
24 June 1956
|
history_3102
|
c0db4e7f-650e-4e75-ab8c-4c12783ac526
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many more AMX-13 tanks were agreed for in the second deal compared to the first?
|
{
"spans": [
"20"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more AMX-13 tanks were agreed for in the second deal compared to the first?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
20
|
history_3102
|
1e30cc81-7c26-4f16-8312-1b63cdac42ae
|
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
|
How many Sherman tanks in total were part of the deal by the end of September 1956?
|
{
"spans": [
"140"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many Sherman tanks in total were part of the deal by the end of September 1956?
Answer based on following passage.
Between 1955 and 1956, Dayan and Shimon Peres negotiated a series of large weapons contracts with France. On 10 November 1955, an agreement was signed for the delivery of 100 AMX-13 tanks and assorted anti-tank weapons. On 24 June 1956, a $80 million deal was agreed involving 72 Dassault Mystère IV jets, 120 AMX-13 tanks, 40 Sherman tanks and 18 Obusier de 155 mm Modèle 50. The Mystere were in addition to 53 already on order. At the end of September 1956, a further 100 Sherman tanks, 300 half-tracks, and 300 6x6 trucks were added.
Answer:
|
140
|
history_4127
|
60cc9602-3aab-464a-a3bc-c64b671de0fd
|
Toward the end of his third term as Mayor of Jacksonville, Martin announced he would not seek re-election and instead declared his candidacy for 1924 Florida gubernatorial election. In the Democratic Party (United States) on June 3, Martin defeated former Governor Sidney Johnston Catts, Frank E. Jennings, Worth W. Trammell (brother of Senator and former Governor Park Trammell), and Charles H. Spencer. There were 55,715 votes for Martin, 43,230 votes for Catts, 37,962 votes for Jennings, 8,381 votes for Trammell, and 1,408 votes for Spencer. Because no candidate received a majority, the second choice of Jennings, Trammell, and Spencer voters were added to the totals for Martin and Catts. Martin won with 73,054 votes versus 49,297 votes for Catts. With the Democratic primary then being tantamount to election, Martin won the general election. He defeated Republican Party (United States) William R. ONeal by a vote of 84,181 to 17,499, a margin of 65.58%.
|
Who are all the people that had more votes than Trammell?
|
{
"spans": [
"Jennings",
"Catts",
"Martin"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Who are all the people that had more votes than Trammell?
Answer based on following passage.
Toward the end of his third term as Mayor of Jacksonville, Martin announced he would not seek re-election and instead declared his candidacy for 1924 Florida gubernatorial election. In the Democratic Party (United States) on June 3, Martin defeated former Governor Sidney Johnston Catts, Frank E. Jennings, Worth W. Trammell (brother of Senator and former Governor Park Trammell), and Charles H. Spencer. There were 55,715 votes for Martin, 43,230 votes for Catts, 37,962 votes for Jennings, 8,381 votes for Trammell, and 1,408 votes for Spencer. Because no candidate received a majority, the second choice of Jennings, Trammell, and Spencer voters were added to the totals for Martin and Catts. Martin won with 73,054 votes versus 49,297 votes for Catts. With the Democratic primary then being tantamount to election, Martin won the general election. He defeated Republican Party (United States) William R. ONeal by a vote of 84,181 to 17,499, a margin of 65.58%.
Answer:
|
Jennings, Catts, Martin
|
history_4127
|
698c35ad-4dc4-4186-b1c0-3f26c6e8f19a
|
Toward the end of his third term as Mayor of Jacksonville, Martin announced he would not seek re-election and instead declared his candidacy for 1924 Florida gubernatorial election. In the Democratic Party (United States) on June 3, Martin defeated former Governor Sidney Johnston Catts, Frank E. Jennings, Worth W. Trammell (brother of Senator and former Governor Park Trammell), and Charles H. Spencer. There were 55,715 votes for Martin, 43,230 votes for Catts, 37,962 votes for Jennings, 8,381 votes for Trammell, and 1,408 votes for Spencer. Because no candidate received a majority, the second choice of Jennings, Trammell, and Spencer voters were added to the totals for Martin and Catts. Martin won with 73,054 votes versus 49,297 votes for Catts. With the Democratic primary then being tantamount to election, Martin won the general election. He defeated Republican Party (United States) William R. ONeal by a vote of 84,181 to 17,499, a margin of 65.58%.
|
How many more votes did Martin have than Catts
|
{
"spans": [
"37962"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more votes did Martin have than Catts
Answer based on following passage.
Toward the end of his third term as Mayor of Jacksonville, Martin announced he would not seek re-election and instead declared his candidacy for 1924 Florida gubernatorial election. In the Democratic Party (United States) on June 3, Martin defeated former Governor Sidney Johnston Catts, Frank E. Jennings, Worth W. Trammell (brother of Senator and former Governor Park Trammell), and Charles H. Spencer. There were 55,715 votes for Martin, 43,230 votes for Catts, 37,962 votes for Jennings, 8,381 votes for Trammell, and 1,408 votes for Spencer. Because no candidate received a majority, the second choice of Jennings, Trammell, and Spencer voters were added to the totals for Martin and Catts. Martin won with 73,054 votes versus 49,297 votes for Catts. With the Democratic primary then being tantamount to election, Martin won the general election. He defeated Republican Party (United States) William R. ONeal by a vote of 84,181 to 17,499, a margin of 65.58%.
Answer:
|
37962
|
history_4127
|
3e247467-fa15-4dcd-9931-ce2a8063f5b4
|
Toward the end of his third term as Mayor of Jacksonville, Martin announced he would not seek re-election and instead declared his candidacy for 1924 Florida gubernatorial election. In the Democratic Party (United States) on June 3, Martin defeated former Governor Sidney Johnston Catts, Frank E. Jennings, Worth W. Trammell (brother of Senator and former Governor Park Trammell), and Charles H. Spencer. There were 55,715 votes for Martin, 43,230 votes for Catts, 37,962 votes for Jennings, 8,381 votes for Trammell, and 1,408 votes for Spencer. Because no candidate received a majority, the second choice of Jennings, Trammell, and Spencer voters were added to the totals for Martin and Catts. Martin won with 73,054 votes versus 49,297 votes for Catts. With the Democratic primary then being tantamount to election, Martin won the general election. He defeated Republican Party (United States) William R. ONeal by a vote of 84,181 to 17,499, a margin of 65.58%.
|
How many more votes did Martin won the general election over ONeal?
|
{
"spans": [
"49183"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more votes did Martin won the general election over ONeal?
Answer based on following passage.
Toward the end of his third term as Mayor of Jacksonville, Martin announced he would not seek re-election and instead declared his candidacy for 1924 Florida gubernatorial election. In the Democratic Party (United States) on June 3, Martin defeated former Governor Sidney Johnston Catts, Frank E. Jennings, Worth W. Trammell (brother of Senator and former Governor Park Trammell), and Charles H. Spencer. There were 55,715 votes for Martin, 43,230 votes for Catts, 37,962 votes for Jennings, 8,381 votes for Trammell, and 1,408 votes for Spencer. Because no candidate received a majority, the second choice of Jennings, Trammell, and Spencer voters were added to the totals for Martin and Catts. Martin won with 73,054 votes versus 49,297 votes for Catts. With the Democratic primary then being tantamount to election, Martin won the general election. He defeated Republican Party (United States) William R. ONeal by a vote of 84,181 to 17,499, a margin of 65.58%.
Answer:
|
49183
|
history_3259
|
4596e02c-9823-43eb-8f88-82c4e863f4ac
|
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
|
How many years after Maynard was teamed up the Joe Namath did Maynard catch 1434 of Namaths historic 4007 passing yards?
|
{
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years after Maynard was teamed up the Joe Namath did Maynard catch 1434 of Namaths historic 4007 passing yards?
Answer based on following passage.
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
Answer:
|
2
|
history_3259
|
9f0880d0-a701-4bfa-9953-139427962a4b
|
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
|
Which player had more receiving yards, Maynard or Tommy McDonald?
|
{
"spans": [
"Maynard"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which player had more receiving yards, Maynard or Tommy McDonald?
Answer based on following passage.
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
Answer:
|
Maynard
|
history_3259
|
26655705-5487-46a3-aec2-3c31721ac302
|
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
|
What year did Maynard retire?
|
{
"spans": [
"1974"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year did Maynard retire?
Answer based on following passage.
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
Answer:
|
1974
|
history_3259
|
d60786c8-bbff-48ef-8974-64bcd28ec9a6
|
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
|
Which team won the 1968 AFL Championship Game, the Oakland Raiders or the Jets?
|
{
"spans": [
"Jets"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which team won the 1968 AFL Championship Game, the Oakland Raiders or the Jets?
Answer based on following passage.
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
Answer:
|
Jets
|
history_3259
|
e4d05366-8d50-4995-9194-2239c1d3e24a
|
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
|
Which team won Super Bowl III, the Jets or the Baltimore Colts?
|
{
"spans": [
"The Jets"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which team won Super Bowl III, the Jets or the Baltimore Colts?
Answer based on following passage.
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
Answer:
|
The Jets
|
history_3259
|
f343e68f-3625-41d5-9da9-af8291f2a97e
|
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
|
How many times did Maynard score 10 touchdowns?
|
{
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many times did Maynard score 10 touchdowns?
Answer based on following passage.
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
Answer:
|
2
|
history_3259
|
954d9851-e467-4b71-9724-17df9399e752
|
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
|
Which year saw exactly 12 less touchdowns than in 1965?
|
{
"spans": [
"1968"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which year saw exactly 12 less touchdowns than in 1965?
Answer based on following passage.
In 1965 Maynard was teamed with rookie quarterback Joe Namath. Maynard had 1,218 yards on 68 receptions and 14 touchdowns in Namaths first season (Namath had 22 touchdown passes that year). In 1967, Maynard caught 1,434 of Namaths historic 4,007 passing yards. The receiving yards were a career-high for Maynard and led the league; he also had 71 receptions, 10 touchdowns, and averaged 20.2 yards per catch. In the 1968 season opener against 1968 Kansas City Chiefs season, Maynard had 200+ receiving yards for the first time in his career and passed Tommy McDonald (American football) as the active leader in receiving yards, where he remained for the next six seasons until his retirement. He added a career-best 228 yards in Game 10 against 1968 Oakland Raiders season. Maynard had 57 receptions for 1,297 yards (22.8 yards per catch) and 10 of Namaths 15 touchdowns that year. In the 1968 AFL Championship Game, a 27-23 Jets victory over the Oakland Raiders, Maynard caught six passes for 118 yards and two touchdowns. His 14-yard catch in the first quarter gave the Jets the lead and his six-yard catch in the fourth quarter proved to be the game winner. The Jets would go on to win Super Bowl III, 16-7 over the NFLs Baltimore Colts, which was hailed as the first "upset" in Super Bowl history. Maynard played, but had no catches while suffering the effects of a hamstring injury in the AFL title game.
Answer:
|
1968
|
history_3446
|
3328887d-5a8e-4729-9e1c-c40c0096bb6c
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many people of Quebec dropped their native language of English in 1971 to 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"213445"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many people of Quebec dropped their native language of English in 1971 to 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
213445
|
history_3446
|
cb5a4519-1d0f-4794-819f-6f9c30925372
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many years did the Anglophones leave the province between 1981 and 1986?
|
{
"spans": [
"5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years did the Anglophones leave the province between 1981 and 1986?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
5
|
history_3446
|
4e37d36e-3a9f-4157-81e6-ebb314a820be
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many years for the population growth for a soft cap between 2013 to 2014?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years for the population growth for a soft cap between 2013 to 2014?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_3446
|
0d9291bf-a641-44f4-ab21-02783c99eb04
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many percent did unemployment rise from 1976 to 1977?
|
{
"spans": [
"1.7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent did unemployment rise from 1976 to 1977?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
1.7
|
history_3446
|
edfeaaad-0c9d-48aa-97da-53ff4281a89c
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
Did more people speak English as a sole native language in 1971 or 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"1971"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did more people speak English as a sole native language in 1971 or 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
1971
|
history_3446
|
615ff4cd-65e7-4e63-8fc6-c6cb3fbfe30e
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many more people spoke English as their sole native language in 1971 than did in 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"213445"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people spoke English as their sole native language in 1971 than did in 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
213445
|
history_3446
|
d8c28e1d-ca09-4f3a-a9e5-2fc0098d0d23
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
By how many has the population of Quebec whose only language was English drop between 1971 and 2006?
|
{
"spans": [
"213445"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: By how many has the population of Quebec whose only language was English drop between 1971 and 2006?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
213445
|
history_3446
|
1b2e275d-037e-4b6c-a8f2-d9d0ac25549f
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many more people comprised the Official Language Minority than the number who used mostly English as their home language?
|
{
"spans": [
"174525"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people comprised the Official Language Minority than the number who used mostly English as their home language?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
174525
|
history_3446
|
21365208-aaef-4798-b649-27615a18a9a1
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
By how many percentage points did the unemployment rate rise between 1976 and 1977?
|
{
"spans": [
"1.7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: By how many percentage points did the unemployment rate rise between 1976 and 1977?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
1.7
|
history_3446
|
380e1bb8-a213-4062-a2ea-39221c6c2b9b
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many more immigrants did Montreal gain between 2013 and 2014 than they lost to other provinces?
|
{
"spans": [
"33000"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more immigrants did Montreal gain between 2013 and 2014 than they lost to other provinces?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
33000
|
history_3446
|
21870b5a-a777-4ecb-8366-6abb07f3c36c
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many fewer people spoke English in Quebec in 2006 than in 1971?
|
{
"spans": [
"213445"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many fewer people spoke English in Quebec in 2006 than in 1971?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
213445
|
history_3446
|
c4955401-f5f0-4615-85f7-b63a100691e5
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many people was Montreal's net population change from 2013 to 2014?
|
{
"spans": [
"33000"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many people was Montreal's net population change from 2013 to 2014?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
33000
|
history_3446
|
4330909e-2183-48d3-803f-2e380618251e
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
How many of the individuals that left the province had university degrees?
|
{
"spans": [
"7500"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many of the individuals that left the province had university degrees?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
7500
|
history_3446
|
e7c97760-8d7b-40d8-b70e-07a52e663db3
|
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
|
In 2006, how many percent of residents did not use English as their home language?
|
{
"spans": [
"90"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: In 2006, how many percent of residents did not use English as their home language?
Answer based on following passage.
According to Statistics Canada, up to 244,000 English-speaking people have emigrated from Quebec to other provinces since the 1970s; those in Quebec whose sole native language was English dropped from 789,000 in 1971 to 575,555 in 2006, when they accounted for 7.6% of the population. Altogether, in 2006, 744,430 (10%) used mostly English as their home language, and 918,955 (12.2%) comprised the Official Language Minority, having English as their First Official language spoken. When many anglophones relocated outside of Quebec after the introduction of the Charter in the 1970s, several English-language schools in Montreal closed their doors. These school closures may also have been brought about by restrictions on who can attend English schools, which has been another ongoing drain on the English school system. Of the Anglophones between 25 and 44 years old who left the province between 1981 and 1986, 15000 individuals, which was half of this group, had university degrees. The provinces unemployment rate rose from 8.7 percent in 1976 to 10.4 percent in 1977, remaining above 10 percent for 19 of the last 23 years of the 20th century. The language barrier has also been regarded as a "soft cap" for population growth; for instance from 2013 to 2014 while Montreal gained around 43,000 immigrants from other parts of the world it lost 10,000 residents to other provinces.
Answer:
|
90
|
history_3355
|
4e1188ae-1ed5-4633-9336-5527e7dd9104
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
How many years after Belichick was hired did he get the team to win their first of three Super Bowl wins under him?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years after Belichick was hired did he get the team to win their first of three Super Bowl wins under him?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_3355
|
d693ff94-f5cd-4a17-9bb4-46e4ed8a6a65
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
Which team scored more points in the Super Bowl XLII, Patriots or New York Giants?
|
{
"spans": [
"New York Giants"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which team scored more points in the Super Bowl XLII, Patriots or New York Giants?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
New York Giants
|
history_3355
|
f7eab511-75dd-4e14-ae12-5eede790342d
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
Before the year 2007, which teams had ended a year 18-1?
|
{
"spans": [
"1984 San Francisco 49ers",
"1985 Chicago Bears season"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Before the year 2007, which teams had ended a year 18-1?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
1984 San Francisco 49ers, 1985 Chicago Bears season
|
history_3355
|
ad24e7ca-b758-43e9-a806-2d7a09e2e376
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
How many years after being defeated by the Giants by 4 points did the Patriots then go on to beat the Seahawks in a Super Bowl?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years after being defeated by the Giants by 4 points did the Patriots then go on to beat the Seahawks in a Super Bowl?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
3
|
history_3355
|
0e84a0ab-dbfc-43ba-9a40-9cb9512c423f
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
How many football teams are regarded as having the most Super Bowl championship wins?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many football teams are regarded as having the most Super Bowl championship wins?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
4
|
history_3355
|
30bce20f-ddc6-4e34-83a8-140de6eda06b
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
How many more Super Bowl wins do the Pittsburgh Steelers over the Patriots?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more Super Bowl wins do the Pittsburgh Steelers over the Patriots?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_3355
|
172dfac9-0d27-41ec-968b-1f1c8ca735b9
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
Which teams have five super bowl victories?
|
{
"spans": [
"Patriots",
"Cowboys",
"49ers"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which teams have five super bowl victories?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
Patriots, Cowboys, 49ers
|
history_3355
|
81fe9f8a-faf3-4b60-8d2e-b4ba5bd847f3
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
How many years between 2001 and 2007 did the Patriots not play in the super bowl?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years between 2001 and 2007 did the Patriots not play in the super bowl?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
3
|
history_3355
|
406fbae1-8b15-403f-904b-95e0ec5b193f
|
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
|
How many total points were scored against the Patriots in the 2011 and 2015 super bowls?
|
{
"spans": [
"45"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many total points were scored against the Patriots in the 2011 and 2015 super bowls?
Answer based on following passage.
The Patriots current coach, Bill Belichick, was hired in 2000, and a new home field, Gillette Stadium, was opened in 2002 NFL season. Under Belichick, the team won three Super Bowls in four years (2001, 2003, and 2004). The Patriots finished the 2007 NFL season with a perfect 16-0 record, becoming only the fourth team in league history to go undefeated in the regular season, and the only one since the league expanded its regular season (NFL) schedule to 16 games. After advancing to Super Bowl XLII, the teams fourth Super Bowl in seven years, the Patriots were defeated by the 2007 New York Giants season to end their bid for a 19-0 season. With the loss, the Patriots ended the year at 18-1, becoming only one of three teams to go 18-1 along with the 1984 San Francisco 49ers season and the 1985 Chicago Bears season. The Patriots returned to the Super Bowl in 2012 but lost again to the 2011 New York Giants season, 21-17. In 2015, they won Super Bowl XLIX, defeating the 2014 Seattle Seahawks season by a score of 28-24. The Patriots became the first team to reach nine Super Bowls in the 2016-17 NFL playoffs and faced the Atlanta Falcons in Super Bowl LI, which ended up paving the way for their fifth Super Bowl victory, tying them with the Dallas Cowboys and the San Francisco 49ers for the second-most in NFL history, 1 behind the Pittsburgh Steelers with 6; the game was also the first Super Bowl to go into overtime.
Answer:
|
45
|
history_3090
|
b3b7408a-579e-48d2-99bd-2c1df423cddb
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
How many more housing units were owner-occupied than occupied by renters?
|
{
"spans": [
"4031"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more housing units were owner-occupied than occupied by renters?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
4031
|
history_3090
|
8ef9626f-8634-431f-bbad-f5f07b6b35bf
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
How many points higher was the rental vacancy rate than the homeowner vacancy rate?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many points higher was the rental vacancy rate than the homeowner vacancy rate?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
4
|
history_3090
|
d7cc3768-43db-4406-961c-c505a2b7545f
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
How many more percentage points of the population lived in owner-occupied housing units than rental housing units?
|
{
"spans": [
"54.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage points of the population lived in owner-occupied housing units than rental housing units?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
54.2
|
history_3090
|
7462b76a-04f7-49ce-8b4e-9ab50e9b6058
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
Which type of housing did more people live in, owner-occupied housing units or people who lived in rental housing units?
|
{
"spans": [
"owner-occupied housing units"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which type of housing did more people live in, owner-occupied housing units or people who lived in rental housing units?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
owner-occupied housing units
|
history_3090
|
0ce9112e-419f-47a2-bfb0-6034bca9457c
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
Which homes were there more of, owner-occupied or renters?
|
{
"spans": [
"owner-occupied"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which homes were there more of, owner-occupied or renters?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
owner-occupied
|
history_3090
|
242fc985-90e1-4ed0-9756-d7140975ac9b
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
How many more people lived in owner-occupied housing units than in rental housing units?
|
{
"spans": [
"12489"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more people lived in owner-occupied housing units than in rental housing units?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
12489
|
history_3090
|
56900a1a-7c98-4c7a-bb11-55a0cd9515c5
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
How many of the 8878 housing units were renter-occupied?
|
{
"spans": [
"2256"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many of the 8878 housing units were renter-occupied?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
2256
|
history_3090
|
d0cef470-c37e-4df6-84be-caad5314a096
|
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
|
How many more percentage points higher was the renter vacancy rate than the homeowner vacancy rate?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more percentage points higher was the renter vacancy rate than the homeowner vacancy rate?
Answer based on following passage.
The 8,878 housing units averaged 685.5 per square mile (264.7/km²), of which 6,287 (73.6%) were owner-occupied, and 2,256 (26.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.2%; the rental vacancy rate was 5.2%. Around 17,769 people (77.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 5,280 people (22.9%) lived in rental housing units.
Answer:
|
4
|
history_2726
|
45580f56-7a46-4471-9490-b71f8029396a
|
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
|
Did members of Congress make more from 1789 to 1815 or from 1818 to 1855?
|
{
"spans": [
"1818 to 1855"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Did members of Congress make more from 1789 to 1815 or from 1818 to 1855?
Answer based on following passage.
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
Answer:
|
1818 to 1855
|
history_2726
|
25441233-b204-468c-b19d-e577a7a66ca4
|
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
|
For how many years were members of Congress paid $8 per day?
|
{
"spans": [
"37"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: For how many years were members of Congress paid $8 per day?
Answer based on following passage.
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
Answer:
|
37
|
history_2726
|
9fee8911-71ab-44f2-86fd-ec35eb3ac3b0
|
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
|
By how many dollars did a Congressman's annual salary increase between 1855 and 1907?
|
{
"spans": [
"4500"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: By how many dollars did a Congressman's annual salary increase between 1855 and 1907?
Answer based on following passage.
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
Answer:
|
4500
|
history_2726
|
b8c05151-2eb7-4663-be78-ea71df4ce7ee
|
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
|
How many dollars higher is a male's average American Household income than a woman's?
|
{
"spans": [
"10011"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many dollars higher is a male's average American Household income than a woman's?
Answer based on following passage.
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
Answer:
|
10011
|
history_2726
|
db01b322-a108-4d50-a7a8-55c94610926a
|
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
|
How many more dollars does a Congressional leader make than a member of Congress?
|
{
"spans": [
"18300"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more dollars does a Congressional leader make than a member of Congress?
Answer based on following passage.
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
Answer:
|
18300
|
history_2726
|
d77176bc-88a9-4b37-9dd2-a7b15416182b
|
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
|
How many more dollars does a Congress member make than the median American male?
|
{
"spans": [
"120087"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more dollars does a Congress member make than the median American male?
Answer based on following passage.
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
Answer:
|
120087
|
history_2726
|
c6672f58-aa6c-4ceb-b197-5b2482e6ed55
|
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
|
For how many years were members of Congress paid $6 per day?
|
{
"spans": [
"26"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: For how many years were members of Congress paid $6 per day?
Answer based on following passage.
From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a daily payment of $6 while in session. Members received an annual salary of $1,500 per year from 1815 to 1817, then a per diem salary of $8 from 1818 to 1855; since then they have received an annual salary, first pegged in 1855 at $3,000. In 1907, salaries were raised to $7,500 per year, the equivalent of $173,000 in 2010. In 2006, members of Congress received a yearly salary of $165,200. Congressional leaders were paid $183,500 per year. The Speaker of the House of Representatives earns $212,100 annually. The salary of the President pro tempore of the United States Senate for 2006 was $183,500, equal to that of the Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives and Party leaders of the United States Senate. Privileges include having an office and paid staff. In 2008, non-officer members of Congress earned $169,300 annually. Some critics complain congressional pay is high compared with a median American Household income in the United States of $45,113 for men and $35,102 for women. Others have countered that congressional pay is consistent with other branches of government. Another criticism is that members of Congress have access to free or low-cost medical care in the Washington D.C. area. The petition, "Remove health-care subsidies for Members of Congress and their families", has already gathered over 1,076,000 signatures on the website Change.org. In January 2014, it was reported that for the first time over half of the members of Congress were millionaires. Congress has been criticized for trying to conceal pay raises by slipping them into a large bill at the last minute. Others have criticized the wealth of members of Congress. Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee told Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig that a chief problem with Congress was that members focused on lucrative careers as lobbyists after serving––that Congress was a "Farm team for K Street (Washington, D.C.)"––instead of on public service.
Answer:
|
26
|
nfl_3455
|
853b5bbd-c71b-4167-bab7-2267b84530c6
|
The Detroit Tigers are an United States professional baseball team based in Detroit, Michigan. The Tigers compete in Major League Baseball (MLB) as a member of the American League (AL) American League Central division. One of the ALs eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Detroit as a member of the minor league Western League (1885–1899) in 1894. They are the oldest continuous one name, one city franchise in the AL. The Tigers have won four World Series championships (, , , and ), 11 List of American League pennant winners (1907, 1908, 1909, 1934, 1935, 1940, 1945, 1968, 1984 American League Championship Series, 2006 American League Championship Series, 2012 American League Championship Series), and four AL Central division championships (2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014). The Tigers also won division titles in 1972, 1984, and 1987 as a member of the American League East. The team currently plays its home games at Comerica Park in Downtown Detroit.
|
How many years were the Tigers a minor league team before becoming a member of the American League?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years were the Tigers a minor league team before becoming a member of the American League?
Answer based on following passage.
The Detroit Tigers are an United States professional baseball team based in Detroit, Michigan. The Tigers compete in Major League Baseball (MLB) as a member of the American League (AL) American League Central division. One of the ALs eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Detroit as a member of the minor league Western League (1885–1899) in 1894. They are the oldest continuous one name, one city franchise in the AL. The Tigers have won four World Series championships (, , , and ), 11 List of American League pennant winners (1907, 1908, 1909, 1934, 1935, 1940, 1945, 1968, 1984 American League Championship Series, 2006 American League Championship Series, 2012 American League Championship Series), and four AL Central division championships (2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014). The Tigers also won division titles in 1972, 1984, and 1987 as a member of the American League East. The team currently plays its home games at Comerica Park in Downtown Detroit.
Answer:
|
4
|
nfl_3455
|
7a3c6860-720a-4af4-9e9d-c355b80cdba0
|
The Detroit Tigers are an United States professional baseball team based in Detroit, Michigan. The Tigers compete in Major League Baseball (MLB) as a member of the American League (AL) American League Central division. One of the ALs eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Detroit as a member of the minor league Western League (1885–1899) in 1894. They are the oldest continuous one name, one city franchise in the AL. The Tigers have won four World Series championships (, , , and ), 11 List of American League pennant winners (1907, 1908, 1909, 1934, 1935, 1940, 1945, 1968, 1984 American League Championship Series, 2006 American League Championship Series, 2012 American League Championship Series), and four AL Central division championships (2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014). The Tigers also won division titles in 1972, 1984, and 1987 as a member of the American League East. The team currently plays its home games at Comerica Park in Downtown Detroit.
|
How many teams have had one continuous name and one continuous city in the American League longer than the Tigers?
|
{
"spans": [
"0"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many teams have had one continuous name and one continuous city in the American League longer than the Tigers?
Answer based on following passage.
The Detroit Tigers are an United States professional baseball team based in Detroit, Michigan. The Tigers compete in Major League Baseball (MLB) as a member of the American League (AL) American League Central division. One of the ALs eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Detroit as a member of the minor league Western League (1885–1899) in 1894. They are the oldest continuous one name, one city franchise in the AL. The Tigers have won four World Series championships (, , , and ), 11 List of American League pennant winners (1907, 1908, 1909, 1934, 1935, 1940, 1945, 1968, 1984 American League Championship Series, 2006 American League Championship Series, 2012 American League Championship Series), and four AL Central division championships (2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014). The Tigers also won division titles in 1972, 1984, and 1987 as a member of the American League East. The team currently plays its home games at Comerica Park in Downtown Detroit.
Answer:
|
0
|
nfl_3455
|
d94fbb75-e78b-4e21-bdf0-68b110d16555
|
The Detroit Tigers are an United States professional baseball team based in Detroit, Michigan. The Tigers compete in Major League Baseball (MLB) as a member of the American League (AL) American League Central division. One of the ALs eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Detroit as a member of the minor league Western League (1885–1899) in 1894. They are the oldest continuous one name, one city franchise in the AL. The Tigers have won four World Series championships (, , , and ), 11 List of American League pennant winners (1907, 1908, 1909, 1934, 1935, 1940, 1945, 1968, 1984 American League Championship Series, 2006 American League Championship Series, 2012 American League Championship Series), and four AL Central division championships (2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014). The Tigers also won division titles in 1972, 1984, and 1987 as a member of the American League East. The team currently plays its home games at Comerica Park in Downtown Detroit.
|
In what years did the Tigers win the American League Central division championship?
|
{
"spans": [
"2011",
"2012",
"2013",
"2014"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: In what years did the Tigers win the American League Central division championship?
Answer based on following passage.
The Detroit Tigers are an United States professional baseball team based in Detroit, Michigan. The Tigers compete in Major League Baseball (MLB) as a member of the American League (AL) American League Central division. One of the ALs eight charter franchises, the club was founded in Detroit as a member of the minor league Western League (1885–1899) in 1894. They are the oldest continuous one name, one city franchise in the AL. The Tigers have won four World Series championships (, , , and ), 11 List of American League pennant winners (1907, 1908, 1909, 1934, 1935, 1940, 1945, 1968, 1984 American League Championship Series, 2006 American League Championship Series, 2012 American League Championship Series), and four AL Central division championships (2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014). The Tigers also won division titles in 1972, 1984, and 1987 as a member of the American League East. The team currently plays its home games at Comerica Park in Downtown Detroit.
Answer:
|
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
|
history_3135
|
dddf0b09-8d43-4ac2-ac41-0b28fe4b83bc
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
How many more yearly employee pre tax was in 2012 than 2008?
|
{
"spans": [
"2000"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more yearly employee pre tax was in 2012 than 2008?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
2000
|
history_3135
|
e311d516-1c05-4553-b41d-131626491b6c
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
What year had the highest pre-tax catch up contributions, 2008 or 2015-2018?
|
{
"spans": [
"2015-2018"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year had the highest pre-tax catch up contributions, 2008 or 2015-2018?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
2015-2018
|
history_3135
|
4b386547-ff57-4cd4-8ea2-afa8e1ac3cdd
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
How many years was the pre-tax for $5500 in 2009-2014?
|
{
"spans": [
"5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years was the pre-tax for $5500 in 2009-2014?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
5
|
history_3135
|
692c5f19-a43a-4e8b-a870-38cdb8f7e8af
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
How many years was the pretax for $6000 for 2015-2018?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years was the pretax for $6000 for 2015-2018?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
3
|
history_3135
|
2ca689e7-1221-435b-95f6-b5ca091b6a0b
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
What year had the largest 402(g) limit, 2015-2017 or 2018?
|
{
"spans": [
"2018"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year had the largest 402(g) limit, 2015-2017 or 2018?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
2018
|
history_3135
|
37dd34aa-7a87-4f23-8fc3-cfcaa9c19595
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
Which year had the highest in 402(g) limit, 2008 or 2009-2011?
|
{
"spans": [
"2009-2011"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which year had the highest in 402(g) limit, 2008 or 2009-2011?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
2009-2011
|
history_3135
|
38d5fdbc-bd30-4586-af10-c2b0243958a1
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
How many more dollars was 2009-2011 than 2008?
|
{
"spans": [
"1000"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more dollars was 2009-2011 than 2008?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
1000
|
history_3135
|
cdacf669-d8e2-47d3-92ee-04a26077b58f
|
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
|
How many years was the 402(g) limit for 17,500 2013-2014?
|
{
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many years was the 402(g) limit for 17,500 2013-2014?
Answer based on following passage.
There is a maximum limit on the total yearly employee pre-tax or Roth salary deferral into the plan. This limit, known as the "402(g) limit", was $15,500 for the year 2008; $16,500 for 2009-2011; $17,000 for 2012; $17,500 for 2013-2014; $18,000 for 2015-2017; and $18,500 for 2018. For future years, the limit may be indexed for inflation, increasing in increments of $500. Employees who are at least 50 years old at any time during the year are now allowed additional pre-tax "catch up" contributions of up to $5,000 for 2008; $5,500 for 2009-2014; and $6,000 for 2015-2018. The limit for future "catch up" contributions may also be adjusted for inflation in increments of $500. In eligible plans, employees can elect to contribute on a pre-tax basis or as a Roth 401(k) contribution, or a combination of the two, but the total of those two contributions amounts must not exceed the contribution limit in a single calendar year. This limit does not apply to post-tax non-Roth elections.
Answer:
|
1
|
history_3156
|
17998da1-b1ba-41be-b33a-721f8d61b8db
|
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
|
Were there more Democratic voters by percentage in Cranford Township or countywide?
|
{
"spans": [
"countywide"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Were there more Democratic voters by percentage in Cranford Township or countywide?
Answer based on following passage.
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Answer:
|
countywide
|
history_3156
|
dddc0991-5531-44d9-8103-9c68968e23c4
|
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
|
Were there more Democratic or Republican voters in Cranford Township in 2011?
|
{
"spans": [
"Democratic"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Were there more Democratic or Republican voters in Cranford Township in 2011?
Answer based on following passage.
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Answer:
|
Democratic
|
history_3156
|
b1bc8829-4b4c-4e02-8719-ae5cf67bbf8b
|
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
|
How many more voters were Democrats than Republicans?
|
{
"spans": [
"1186"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many more voters were Democrats than Republicans?
Answer based on following passage.
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Answer:
|
1186
|
history_3156
|
5ed8dffe-e510-4111-a753-ea4d42856aea
|
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
|
How many registered voters were not registered as Democrat or Republican?
|
{
"spans": [
"7046"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many registered voters were not registered as Democrat or Republican?
Answer based on following passage.
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Answer:
|
7046
|
history_3156
|
06d340d1-adcc-4621-b66b-d97912d2e14f
|
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
|
How many percent of residents in Cranford Township were not registered to vote?
|
{
"spans": [
"30.8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many percent of residents in Cranford Township were not registered to vote?
Answer based on following passage.
As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 15,649 registered voters in Cranford Township, of which 4,887 (31.2% vs. 41.8% countywide) were registered as Democratic Party (United States), 3,701 (23.7% vs. 15.3%) were registered as Republican Party (United States) and 7,046 (45.0% vs. 42.9%) were registered as Unaffiliated (New Jersey). There were 15 voters registered to other parties. Among the townships 2010 Census population, 69.2% (vs. 53.3% in Union County) were registered to vote, including 91.2% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 70.6% countywide).
Answer:
|
30.8
|
history_3821
|
1cec823b-1888-4ca8-889a-25a765f6708c
|
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
|
How many hours is Gabapentin taken for 200 mg?
|
{
"spans": [
"5.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many hours is Gabapentin taken for 200 mg?
Answer based on following passage.
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
Answer:
|
5.4
|
history_3821
|
19ddd9bc-17fb-46de-92a8-9dbc12bcb30e
|
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
|
How many milligrams is taken for Gabapentin for 6.7 hours?
|
{
"spans": [
"400"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many milligrams is taken for Gabapentin for 6.7 hours?
Answer based on following passage.
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
Answer:
|
400
|
history_3821
|
4631d86d-4857-4a5f-ab27-8e7a4a02c5ea
|
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
|
What is the largest amount of milligrams of Gabapentin a person can take, 1200 or 1400?
|
{
"spans": [
"1400"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What is the largest amount of milligrams of Gabapentin a person can take, 1200 or 1400?
Answer based on following passage.
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
Answer:
|
1400
|
history_3821
|
2d03cb51-2f8a-4fb5-a33c-2b655aa79c48
|
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
|
What hour is the shortest amount of time to take Gabapentin
|
{
"spans": [
"4.5 to 6.5"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What hour is the shortest amount of time to take Gabapentin
Answer based on following passage.
Elimination Gabapentin is elimination (pharmacology) renally in the urine. It has a relatively short elimination half-life, with a reported value of 5.0 to 7.0 hours. Similarly, the terminal half-life of gabapentin enacarbil IR (as active gabapentin) is short at approximately 4.5 to 6.5 hours. The elimination half-life of gabapentin has been found to be extended with increasing doses; in one series of studies, it was 5.4 hours for 200 mg, 6.7 hours for 400 mg, 7.3 hours for 800 mg, 9.3 hours for 1,200 mg, and 8.3 hours for 1,400 mg, all given in single doses. Because of its short elimination half-life, gabapentin must be administered 3 to 4 times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. Conversely, gabapentin enacarbil is taken twice a day and gabapentin XR (brand name Gralise) is taken once a day.
Answer:
|
4.5 to 6.5
|
history_3320
|
bac66c0a-e8e8-4d02-8d31-753e99ffe4d6
|
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
|
For the year ending July 2016, how many more Euros (in billions) did UCL have in income versus expenditures?
|
{
"spans": [
"0.13"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: For the year ending July 2016, how many more Euros (in billions) did UCL have in income versus expenditures?
Answer based on following passage.
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
Answer:
|
0.13
|
history_3320
|
b172e92f-96aa-4177-a8bf-b79f180a5bbc
|
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
|
What was the third largest source of income?
|
{
"spans": [
"funding body grants"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What was the third largest source of income?
Answer based on following passage.
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
Answer:
|
funding body grants
|
history_3320
|
0b6ad092-0d57-4d77-a41b-24612c7dce0b
|
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
|
How many Euros (in billions) of their endowment did UCL use between July 2015 and July 2016?
|
{
"spans": [
"3.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many Euros (in billions) of their endowment did UCL use between July 2015 and July 2016?
Answer based on following passage.
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
Answer:
|
3.2
|
history_3320
|
4579b69d-ea44-46c3-bb9b-0b6612bf8014
|
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
|
How many Euros (in millions) did UCL earn from research grants, funding body grants, and donations?
|
{
"spans": [
"747.6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many Euros (in millions) did UCL earn from research grants, funding body grants, and donations?
Answer based on following passage.
In the financial year ended 31 July 2016, UCL had a total income (excluding share of joint ventures) of £1.36 billion (2014/15 - £1.26 billion) and a total expenditure of £1.23 billion (2014/15 - £1.22 billion). Key sources of income included £530.4 million from research grants and contracts (2014/15 - £427.3 million), £421.1 million from tuition fees and education contracts (2014/15 - £364.2 million), £192.1 million from funding body grants (2014/15 - £195.2 million) and £25.1 million from donations and endowments (2014/15 - £20.3 million). During the 2015/16 financial year UCL had a capital expenditure of £146.6 million (2014/15 - £149.3 million). At year end UCL had endowments of £100.9 million (31 July 2015 - £104.1 million) and total net assets of £1.19 billion (31 July 2015 - £1.07 million).
Answer:
|
747.6
|
history_2439
|
2098d17c-fed3-4052-851d-d2780fb34a60
|
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
|
How many different locations did the The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else include?
|
{
"spans": [
"3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many different locations did the The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else include?
Answer based on following passage.
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
Answer:
|
3
|
history_2439
|
0b76894c-06d0-451e-bd83-767a62e4070f
|
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
|
How many performances for Motörhead were announced in 2011?
|
{
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many performances for Motörhead were announced in 2011?
Answer based on following passage.
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
Answer:
|
4
|
history_2439
|
5ea480c9-3d4d-4fda-98cb-0285fbfc8657
|
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
|
What year did Motörhead play at the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser, 2011 or 2012?
|
{
"spans": [
"2012"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What year did Motörhead play at the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser, 2011 or 2012?
Answer based on following passage.
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
Answer:
|
2012
|
history_2439
|
62a1fdbe-890c-4890-beb7-c8afcb70b9cc
|
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
|
How many days was the Gigantour?
|
{
"spans": [
"34"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many days was the Gigantour?
Answer based on following passage.
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
Answer:
|
34
|
history_2439
|
332cbfc4-ac07-4209-a4bb-500cab46ada5
|
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
|
What months in 2011 did Motörhead perform in 2011?
|
{
"spans": [
"January",
"March",
"August"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: What months in 2011 did Motörhead perform in 2011?
Answer based on following passage.
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
Answer:
|
January, March, August
|
history_2439
|
5107a12b-9143-4513-8c41-e10dd07c13dc
|
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
|
Which city were they playing at first, Nürburgring or Nuremberg?
|
{
"spans": [
"Nürburgring"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: Which city were they playing at first, Nürburgring or Nuremberg?
Answer based on following passage.
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
Answer:
|
Nürburgring
|
history_2439
|
e686c2ce-6d4d-4987-8fe7-fd8a37918bc1
|
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
|
How many days did the Gigantour take place?
|
{
"spans": [
"33"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
}
|
question context answer
|
Question: {{question}}
Answer based on following passage.
{{passage}}
Answer:
||| {{ answers_spans.spans | join(", ") }}
|
Question: How many days did the Gigantour take place?
Answer based on following passage.
On 17 January 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would be part of the Sonisphere Festival in Knebworth. In August 2011, they headlined the Brutal Assault open-air festival in the Czech Republic. On 2 March 2011 Motörhead performed on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. On 9 July 2011, former guitarist Würzel died of a heart attack. In celebration of 35 years touring, in late 2011 the band released the live DVD The Wörld Is Ours - Vol 1 - Everywhere Further Than Everyplace Else, including performances at the O2 Apollo Manchester, Best Buy Theater, New York City and Teatro Caupolicán, Santiago de Chile. On 19 December 2011, it was announced that Motörhead would play at the German festivals Rock am Ring and Rock im Park in Nürburgring and Nuremberg respectively in June 2012. On 12 January 2012, it was announced that Motörhead were touring the US and Canada in early 2012, along with three other metal bands Megadeth, Volbeat and Lacuna Coil. The Gigantour took place from 26 January to 28 February 2012, but Motörhead missed the final four shows because Lemmy had a combination of an upper respiratory viral infection and voice strain, resulting in severe laryngitis. Lemmy wrote on Facebook, "Im giving my voice a good rest", hoping he would recover soon to play at the Mayhem Festival, which was held from 30 June to 5 August 2012. Motörhead also took part on 23 June in the Rock-A-Field Luxembourg Open Air Festival in Roeser.
Answer:
|
33
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.