promptID
int32
0
146k
pairID
stringlengths
2
7
premise
stringlengths
5
1.82k
premise_binary_parse
stringlengths
6
3.43k
premise_parse
stringlengths
23
6.45k
hypothesis
stringlengths
1
393
hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths
1
669
hypothesis_parse
stringlengths
19
1.15k
genre
stringclasses
5 values
label
class label
3 classes
template_name
stringclasses
11 values
template
stringclasses
11 values
rendered_input
stringlengths
46
2.02k
rendered_output
stringclasses
14 values
91,535
91535e
In Venice, I watched tourists on a bridge videotape tourists on a boat, who in turn were videotaping the tourists on the bridge.
( ( In Venice ) ( , ( I ( ( ( ( watched tourists ) ( on ( a ( bridge ( videotape tourists ) ) ) ) ) ( on ( ( ( a boat ) , ) ( who ( ( in turn ) ( were ( ( videotaping ( the tourists ) ) ( on ( the bridge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NNP Venice))) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD watched) (NP (NNS tourists)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (JJ bridge) (NN videotape) (NNS tourists))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN boat)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (PP (IN in) (NP (NN turn))) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBG videotaping) (NP (DT the) (NNS tourists)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN bridge)))))))))) (. .)))
Many tourists were videotaping others.
( ( Many tourists ) ( ( were ( videotaping others ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Many) (NNS tourists)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBG videotaping) (NP (NNS others)))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In Venice, I watched tourists on a bridge videotape tourists on a boat, who in turn were videotaping the tourists on the bridge. Then the following statement: "Many tourists were videotaping others." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
37,074
37074c
no i served on on both a criminal and a a civil um jury and in my criminal trial he pled guilty um to the first to to kidnapping and so we went through the second part of the trial because in Texas there are two parts first of all to find if they are guilty or innocent he already said he's guilty so then then we go through the trial to determine what uh punishment should be meted out
( ( no i ) ( ( served on ) ( ( ( on ( ( ( both ( a criminal ) ) and ) ( a ( ( a ( civil um ) ) jury ) ) ) ) and ) ( in ( ( my ( criminal trial ) ) ( ( ( he ( ( ( pled ( guilty um ) ) ( to ( the first ) ) ) ( to ( to kidnapping ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( so ( we ( ( went ( through ( ( the ( second part ) ) ( of ( the trial ) ) ) ) ) ( because ( ( in Texas ) ( there ( are ( ( ( two ( parts first ) ) ( of all ) ) ( to ( find ( if ( they ( are ( ( guilty or ) innocent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( he ( already ( said ( he ( 's guilty ) ) ) ) ) so ) ( then ( then ( we ( go ( through ( the ( trial ( to ( determine ( what ( uh ( punishment ( should ( be ( meted out ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT no) (FW i)) (VP (VBD served) (PRT (RP on)) (PP (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (PDT both) (DT a) (NN criminal)) (CC and) (NP (DT a) (NP (DT a) (JJ civil) (NN um)) (NN jury)))) (CC and) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (JJ criminal) (NN trial)) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD pled) (NP (JJ guilty) (NN um)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ first))) (PP (TO to) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN kidnapping)))))) (CC and) (S (SBAR (RB so) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD went) (PP (IN through) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ second) (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN trial))))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Texas))) (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (CD two) (NNS parts) (JJ first)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT all))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB find) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ guilty) (CC or) (JJ innocent))))))))))))))) (S (NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB already)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ guilty))))))) (IN so) (S (ADVP (RB then)) (ADVP (RB then)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP go) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT the) (NN trial) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB determine) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (NN punishment)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN meted) (PRT (RP out)))))))))))))))))))))))
Innocence and punishment are decided at the same time in trials in Texas.
( ( ( Innocence and ) punishment ) ( ( are ( decided ( at ( ( the ( same time ) ) ( in ( trials ( in Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Innocence) (CC and) (NN punishment)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN decided) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN time)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS trials)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Texas))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: no i served on on both a criminal and a a civil um jury and in my criminal trial he pled guilty um to the first to to kidnapping and so we went through the second part of the trial because in Texas there are two parts first of all to find if they are guilty or innocent he already said he's guilty so then then we go through the trial to determine what uh punishment should be meted out Then the following statement: "Innocence and punishment are decided at the same time in trials in Texas." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
81,572
81572n
The Final Report and Order is subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and has received OMB clearance (OMB #3060-0636).
( ( ( ( The ( Final Report ) ) and ) Order ) ( ( ( ( ( is ( subject ( to ( ( the ( Paperwork ( Reduction Act ) ) ) ( of 1995 ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( has ( received ( ( OMB clearance ) ( -LRB- ( ( OMB ( # 3060-0636 ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Final) (NNP Report)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Order))) (VP (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ subject) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Paperwork) (NNP Reduction) (NNP Act)) (PP (IN of) (NP (CD 1995))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN received) (NP (NP (NNP OMB) (NN clearance)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (NNP OMB)) (NP (# #) (CD 3060-0636))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))))) (. .)))
The Final Report and Order passed on Oct. 12, 1999.
( ( ( ( The ( Final Report ) ) and ) Order ) ( ( passed ( on ( ( ( Oct. 12 ) , ) 1999 ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Final) (NNP Report)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Order))) (VP (VBD passed) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Oct.) (CD 12) (, ,) (CD 1999)))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Final Report and Order is subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and has received OMB clearance (OMB #3060-0636). Then the following statement: "The Final Report and Order passed on Oct. 12, 1999." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
62,289
62289n
Do you still want to join us?
( ( ( ( Do you ) still ) ( want ( to ( join us ) ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (SQ (VBP Do) (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VB want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB join) (NP (PRP us)))))) (. ?)))
Would you still like to meet us at the steakhouse for dinner saturday?
( ( ( ( Would you ) still ) ( like ( to ( ( ( meet us ) ( at ( ( the steakhouse ) ( for dinner ) ) ) ) saturday ) ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (SQ (MD Would) (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VB like) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB meet) (NP (PRP us)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN steakhouse)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN dinner))))) (NP (NNP saturday)))))) (. ?)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Do you still want to join us? Then the following statement: "Would you still like to meet us at the steakhouse for dinner saturday?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
18,106
18106n
Shiloh! León must have read something of Drew's blazing anger in his face, for the Mexican's mouth went a little slack and his hand came up in an involuntary gesture as if to ward off a blow.
( ( Shiloh ( ! León ) ) ( ( must ( have ( ( ( ( read ( something ( of ( ( Drew 's ) ( blazing anger ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( his face ) ) ) , ) ( for ( ( ( the ( Mexican 's ) ) mouth ) ( went ( ( ( ( a ( little slack ) ) and ) ( his hand ) ) ( ( ( came up ) ( in ( an ( involuntary gesture ) ) ) ) ( as ( if ( to ( ( ward off ) ( a blow ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Shiloh) (. !) (NNP León)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN read) (NP (NP (NN something)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Drew) (POS 's)) (JJ blazing) (NN anger)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN face))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN for) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Mexican) (POS 's)) (NN mouth)) (VP (VBD went) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ little) (NN slack)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN hand))) (VP (VBD came) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT an) (JJ involuntary) (NN gesture))) (SBAR (RB as) (IN if) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB ward) (PRT (RP off)) (NP (DT a) (NN blow))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Leon raised his left hand in fear that Drew would strike him.
( Leon ( ( ( ( raised ( his ( left hand ) ) ) ( in fear ) ) ( that ( Drew ( would ( strike him ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Leon)) (VP (VBD raised) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ left) (NN hand)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN fear))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Drew)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB strike) (NP (PRP him))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Shiloh! León must have read something of Drew's blazing anger in his face, for the Mexican's mouth went a little slack and his hand came up in an involuntary gesture as if to ward off a blow. Then the following statement: "Leon raised his left hand in fear that Drew would strike him. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
7,834
7834e
right right it does indeed uh-huh
( ( right right ) ( it ( does ( indeed uh-huh ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB right) (RB right)) (NP (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ does) (NP (RB indeed) (JJ uh-huh))))))))
Yes it does.
( Yes ( it ( does . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Yes)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ does)) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: right right it does indeed uh-huh Then the following statement: "Yes it does. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
72,102
72102c
do you really need to have that certification
( ( do you ) ( really ( need ( to ( have ( that certification ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VBP do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (ADVP (RB really)) (VB need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT that) (NN certification))))))))
I don't think you need that certification at all.
( I ( ( ( do n't ) ( think ( you ( ( need ( that certification ) ) ( at all ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB think) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB need) (NP (DT that) (NN certification)) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: do you really need to have that certification Then the following statement: "I don't think you need that certification at all." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
34,839
34839c
well it's it's a bidding war between teams and it's also popularity contest between sports to see who can get the biggest uh paycheck
( ( ( well ( it ( 's ( it ( 's ( ( a ( bidding war ) ) ( between teams ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( it ( ( 's also ) ( ( popularity contest ) ( between ( sports ( to ( see ( who ( can ( get ( the ( biggest ( uh paycheck ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (NP (S (S (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN bidding) (NN war)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NNS teams))))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB also)) (NP (NP (NN popularity) (NN contest)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NNS sports) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (MD can) (VP (VB get) (NP (DT the) (JJS biggest) (JJ uh) (NN paycheck)))))))))))))))))
Teams are not allowed to compete against each other in buying players.
( Teams ( ( ( are not ) ( allowed ( to ( compete ( against ( ( each other ) ( in ( buying players ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Teams)) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (VP (VBN allowed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB compete) (PP (IN against) (NP (NP (DT each) (JJ other)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN buying) (NNS players)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well it's it's a bidding war between teams and it's also popularity contest between sports to see who can get the biggest uh paycheck Then the following statement: "Teams are not allowed to compete against each other in buying players." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
144,595
144595n
I tried to forget you, but the compulsion grew until I could fight it no longer." She shuddered.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( I ( tried ( to ( forget you ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( the compulsion ) ( grew ( until ( I ( could ( ( fight it ) ( no longer ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) '' ) ( She shuddered ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD tried) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB forget) (NP (PRP you))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (DT the) (NN compulsion)) (VP (VBD grew) (SBAR (IN until) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB fight) (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB no) (RB longer))))))))) (. .) ('' '') (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD shuddered))) (. .)))
I don't have the strength to forget you.
( I ( ( ( do n't ) ( have ( the ( strength ( to ( forget you ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT the) (NN strength) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB forget) (NP (PRP you)))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I tried to forget you, but the compulsion grew until I could fight it no longer." She shuddered. Then the following statement: "I don't have the strength to forget you." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
28,061
28061n
Two old girlfriends dish the latest dirt.
( ( Two ( old girlfriends ) ) ( ( dish ( the ( latest dirt ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (CD Two) (JJ old) (NNS girlfriends)) (VP (VBZ dish) (NP (DT the) (JJS latest) (NN dirt))) (. .)))
Two friends are gossiping and it is a hobby of theirs.
( ( ( ( ( Two friends ) ( are gossiping ) ) and ) ( it ( is ( ( a hobby ) ( of theirs ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (CD Two) (NNS friends)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG gossiping)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN hobby)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP theirs)))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Two old girlfriends dish the latest dirt. Then the following statement: "Two friends are gossiping and it is a hobby of theirs." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
12,986
12986c
small island
( small island )
(ROOT (NP (JJ small) (NN island)))
The island is huge!
( ( The island ) ( ( is huge ) ! ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN island)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ huge))) (. !)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: small island Then the following statement: "The island is huge!" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
30,753
30753c
'That's somethin' I approve of.'
( ` ( That ( ( ( 's ( somethin' ( I ( approve of ) ) ) ) . ) ' ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` `) (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBG somethin') (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VB approve) (PP (IN of)))))) (. .) ('' ')))
I don't like that at all.
( I ( ( ( do n't ) ( ( like that ) ( at all ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB like) (NP (DT that)) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 'That's somethin' I approve of.' Then the following statement: "I don't like that at all." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
16,029
16029c
you know the other half but didn't read the i read the half where she was in her later years and it was absolutely excellent and it was very descriptive of of people with money back then and uh affluents in in England uh uh that you know were associated to the king and all and it was
( you ( ( ( know ( the ( other half ) ) ) but ) ( ( did n't ) ( read ( ( the i ) ( ( read ( the half ) ) ( where ( ( ( she ( was ( in ( her ( later years ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( it ( was ( absolutely excellent ) ) ) and ) ( it ( ( ( ( was ( very ( descriptive ( of ( of ( people ( with money ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( back then ) and ) ( ( uh affluents ) in ) ) ) ( in ( England ( uh uh ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( ( you ( know ( were ( associated ( to ( ( ( the king ) and ) all ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( it was ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VP (VBP know) (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NN half))) (CC but) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB read) (S (NP (DT the) (FW i)) (VP (VB read) (NP (DT the) (NN half)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ later) (NNS years))))) (CC and) (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB absolutely) (JJ excellent)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ descriptive) (PP (IN of) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS people)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN money))))))) (ADVP (ADVP (RB back) (RB then)) (CC and) (ADVP (NP (CD uh) (NNS affluents)) (IN in))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP England)) (FRAG (INTJ (UH uh) (UH uh))))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN associated) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN king)) (CC and) (NP (DT all)))))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was)))))))))))))))))
I haven't even picked it up yet.
( I ( ( ( ( have n't ) even ) ( ( picked it ) ( up yet ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VBN picked) (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB up) (RB yet)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: you know the other half but didn't read the i read the half where she was in her later years and it was absolutely excellent and it was very descriptive of of people with money back then and uh affluents in in England uh uh that you know were associated to the king and all and it was Then the following statement: "I haven't even picked it up yet." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
57,070
57070n
yeah course the ozone is up there so
( ( yeah course ) ( ( the ozone ) ( is ( up ( there so ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (NP (NN course)) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN ozone)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB up) (RB there) (RB so))))))))
The ozone is up there and is disappearing.
( ( The ozone ) ( ( ( ( is ( up there ) ) and ) ( is disappearing ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN ozone)) (VP (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB up) (RB there))) (CC and) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG disappearing)))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah course the ozone is up there so Then the following statement: "The ozone is up there and is disappearing. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
67,974
67974e
Although Alcoy has a reputation for dourness and occasional winter snow, the townspeople are usually very friendly.
( ( Although ( Alcoy ( has ( ( a reputation ) ( for ( ( dourness and ) ( occasional ( winter snow ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the townspeople ) ( ( ( are usually ) ( very friendly ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN Although) (S (NP (NNP Alcoy)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN reputation)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNS dourness)) (CC and) (NP (JJ occasional) (NN winter) (NN snow)))))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN townspeople)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB usually)) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ friendly))) (. .)))
The people that live in Alcoy are friendly despite the weather.
( ( ( The people ) ( that ( live ( in Alcoy ) ) ) ) ( ( are ( friendly ( despite ( the weather ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS people)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP live) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Alcoy))))))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ friendly) (PP (IN despite) (NP (DT the) (NN weather))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Although Alcoy has a reputation for dourness and occasional winter snow, the townspeople are usually very friendly. Then the following statement: "The people that live in Alcoy are friendly despite the weather. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
31,083
31083c
Man Bites Dog is a great headline.
( ( Man ( Bites Dog ) ) ( ( is ( a ( great headline ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Man) (NNPS Bites) (NNP Dog)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (JJ great) (NN headline))) (. .)))
One example of a terrible headline would be Man Bites Dog.
( ( ( One example ) ( of ( a ( terrible headline ) ) ) ) ( ( would ( be ( Man ( Bites Dog ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (CD One) (NN example)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (JJ terrible) (NN headline)))) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (NP (NNP Man) (NNPS Bites) (NNP Dog)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Man Bites Dog is a great headline. Then the following statement: "One example of a terrible headline would be Man Bites Dog." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
26,222
26222n
In 2002, the President's Quality Award criteria were reoriented to be consistent with the President's Management Agenda.
( ( In 2002 ) ( , ( ( ( the ( President 's ) ) ( Quality ( Award criteria ) ) ) ( ( were ( reoriented ( to ( be ( consistent ( with ( ( the ( President 's ) ) ( Management Agenda ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (CD 2002))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP President) (POS 's)) (JJ Quality) (NN Award) (NNS criteria)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN reoriented) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ consistent) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP President) (POS 's)) (NNP Management) (NNP Agenda))))))))) (. .)))
the President's Quality Award criteria were costly to most people of the public
( ( ( the ( President 's ) ) ( Quality ( Award criteria ) ) ) ( were ( costly ( to ( ( most people ) ( of ( the public ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP President) (POS 's)) (JJ Quality) (NN Award) (NNS criteria)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ costly) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (JJS most) (NNS people)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN public)))))))))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In 2002, the President's Quality Award criteria were reoriented to be consistent with the President's Management Agenda. Then the following statement: "the President's Quality Award criteria were costly to most people of the public" is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
68,688
68688c
The cloud of doom over Lamar Alexander's campaign.
( ( ( ( The cloud ) ( of doom ) ) ( over ( ( Lamar ( Alexander 's ) ) campaign ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT The) (NN cloud)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN doom))) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (NNP Lamar) (NNP Alexander) (POS 's)) (NN campaign))) (. .)))
Lamar Alexander's campaign is breaking records and gaining steam.
( ( ( Lamar ( Alexander 's ) ) campaign ) ( ( is ( ( ( breaking records ) and ) ( gaining steam ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Lamar) (NNP Alexander) (POS 's)) (NN campaign)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VP (VBG breaking) (NP (NNS records))) (CC and) (VP (VBG gaining) (NP (NN steam))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The cloud of doom over Lamar Alexander's campaign. Then the following statement: "Lamar Alexander's campaign is breaking records and gaining steam." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
66,142
66142c
In Timna National Park you can see some of the 10,000 old mine shafts found here and the remains of smelting places.
( ( In ( Timna ( National Park ) ) ) ( you ( ( can ( see ( some ( of ( ( ( ( the ( 10,000 ( old ( mine shafts ) ) ) ) ( found here ) ) and ) ( ( the remains ) ( of ( smelting places ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NNP Timna) (NNP National) (NNP Park))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB see) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (CD 10,000) (JJ old) (NN mine) (NNS shafts)) (VP (VBN found) (ADVP (RB here)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS remains)) (PP (IN of) (NP (VBG smelting) (NNS places))))))))) (. .)))
There are no mining implements in Timna National Park.
( There ( ( are ( ( no mining ) ( implements ( in ( Timna ( National Park ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN mining)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ implements) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Timna) (NNP National) (NNP Park)))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In Timna National Park you can see some of the 10,000 old mine shafts found here and the remains of smelting places. Then the following statement: "There are no mining implements in Timna National Park. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
37,056
37056n
right well i guess he'd have to be careful whether with entrapment or some of those things
( ( right well ) ( i ( guess ( he ( 'd ( have ( to ( be ( careful ( whether ( with ( ( entrapment or ) ( some ( of ( those things ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB right) (RB well)) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP guess) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VB have) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ careful) (SBAR (IN whether) (FRAG (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NN entrapment)) (CC or) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT those) (NNS things))))))))))))))))))))))
He sometimes has problems with entrapment.
( He ( sometimes ( ( has ( problems ( with entrapment ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (ADVP (RB sometimes)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (NNS problems)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN entrapment))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: right well i guess he'd have to be careful whether with entrapment or some of those things Then the following statement: "He sometimes has problems with entrapment." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
66,492
66492c
sure they should have them go out and doing stuff cleaning up or picking up dirt or weeds or who knows what something for the for the state since the state is paying for them they should get some kind of kind of work out of them
( ( ( sure ( they ( should ( have ( them ( go out ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( doing stuff ) ( ( ( cleaning up ) or ) ( ( picking up ) ( ( ( ( dirt or ) weeds ) or ) ( who ( knows ( what ( ( something ( for ( the ( for ( ( the state ) ( since ( the state ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( is ( paying ( for them ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( they ( should ( get ( ( some kind ) ( of ( kind ( of ( work ( out ( of them ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (NP (S (S (ADVP (RB sure)) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (S (NP (PRP them)) (VP (VB go) (PRT (RP out))))))) (CC and) (S (S (VP (VBG doing) (NP (NN stuff)) (S (VP (VP (VBG cleaning) (PRT (RP up))) (CC or) (VP (VBG picking) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (NP (NP (NN dirt)) (CC or) (NP (NNS weeds))) (CC or) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ knows) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (NP (NN something)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT the)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN state)) (PP (IN since) (NP (DT the) (NN state)))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG paying) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP them)))))))))))))))) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB get) (NP (NP (DT some) (NN kind)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN kind)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN work)) (PP (RB out) (IN of) (NP (PRP them))))))))))))))
They shouldn't be doing anything for the state because the state is not incurring their costs.
( They ( ( ( should n't ) ( be ( ( doing ( anything ( for ( the state ) ) ) ) ( because ( ( the state ) ( ( is not ) ( incurring ( their costs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (MD should) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBG doing) (NP (NP (NN anything)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN state)))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT the) (NN state)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (VP (VBG incurring) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS costs))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: sure they should have them go out and doing stuff cleaning up or picking up dirt or weeds or who knows what something for the for the state since the state is paying for them they should get some kind of kind of work out of them Then the following statement: "They shouldn't be doing anything for the state because the state is not incurring their costs." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
137,737
137737n
"Guess so."
( `` ( ( ( Guess so ) . ) '' ) )
(ROOT (S (`` ``) (VP (VB Guess) (ADVP (RB so))) (. .) ('' '')))
I'm not sure about what happened last night, but I believe so.
( ( ( ( ( I ( ( 'm not ) ( sure ( about ( what ( happened ( last night ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( I ( believe so ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ sure) (PP (IN about) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBD happened) (NP (JJ last) (NN night))))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP believe) (ADVP (RB so)))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: "Guess so." Then the following statement: "I'm not sure about what happened last night, but I believe so. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
32,629
32629c
yeah it's unfortunate because yeah you know even even though you you think of them as a whole family when you do things sometimes you separate them without even realizing it
( yeah ( it ( ( ( 's ( unfortunate ( because yeah ) ) ) ( you ( know ( even ( even ( ( though you ) ( you ( ( think ( of them ) ) ( as ( a ( whole family ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( when ( you ( ( ( do things ) sometimes ) ( you ( ( separate them ) ( without ( even ( realizing it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ unfortunate) (PP (IN because) (NP (NN yeah)))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (RB even) (RB even) (S (PP (IN though) (NP (PRP you))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP think) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP them))) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (JJ whole) (NN family))))))))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (NP (NNS things)) (ADVP (RB sometimes)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP separate) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN without) (S (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VBG realizing) (NP (PRP it)))))))))))))))))
It's unfortunate that you separate them without realising it but that's because you don't really think of them as a whole family.
( It ( ( ( 's unfortunate ) ( ( ( that ( you ( ( separate them ) ( without ( realising it ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( that ( 's ( because ( you ( ( ( do n't ) really ) ( ( think ( of them ) ) ( as ( a ( whole family ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ unfortunate)) (SBAR (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP separate) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN without) (S (VP (VBG realising) (NP (PRP it)))))))) (CC but) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VB think) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP them))) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (JJ whole) (NN family)))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah it's unfortunate because yeah you know even even though you you think of them as a whole family when you do things sometimes you separate them without even realizing it Then the following statement: "It's unfortunate that you separate them without realising it but that's because you don't really think of them as a whole family. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
71,110
71110n
He was wrong, but not by too much.
( ( ( ( He ( was wrong ) ) , ) ( but ( not ( by ( too much ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ wrong)))) (, ,) (FRAG (CC but) (RB not) (PP (IN by) (ADJP (RB too) (JJ much)))) (. .)))
The teacher corrected him almost immediately.
( ( The teacher ) ( ( ( corrected him ) ( almost immediately ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN teacher)) (VP (VBD corrected) (NP (PRP him)) (ADVP (RB almost) (RB immediately))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He was wrong, but not by too much. Then the following statement: "The teacher corrected him almost immediately." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
113,364
113364n
In the 1440s he designed the gracefully arched loggia and the Ospedale degli Innocenti, the first hospital for foundlings in Europe; swaddled babes are the subject of Andrea della Robbia's roundels above the arches.
( ( ( ( ( In ( the 1440s ) ) ( he ( ( designed ( ( ( the ( gracefully ( arched loggia ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( the ( Ospedale ( degli Innocenti ) ) ) , ) ( the ( first hospital ) ) ) ) ) ( for ( foundlings ( in Europe ) ) ) ) ) ) ; ) ( ( swaddled babes ) ( are ( ( ( the subject ) ( of ( ( Andrea ( della ( Robbia 's ) ) ) roundels ) ) ) ( above ( the arches ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (NNS 1440s))) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD designed) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ gracefully) (JJ arched) (NN loggia)) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Ospedale) (NNP degli) (NNP Innocenti)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN hospital)))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNS foundlings)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Europe))))))) (: ;) (S (NP (JJ swaddled) (NNS babes)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN subject)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Andrea) (NNP della) (NNP Robbia) (POS 's)) (NNS roundels))) (PP (IN above) (NP (DT the) (NNS arches)))))) (. .)))
The orphan hospital in Europe had an enormous number of patients in its first year.
( ( ( The ( orphan hospital ) ) ( in Europe ) ) ( ( had ( ( an ( enormous number ) ) ( of ( patients ( in ( its ( first year ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ orphan) (NN hospital)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Europe)))) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ enormous) (NN number)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS patients)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ first) (NN year))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In the 1440s he designed the gracefully arched loggia and the Ospedale degli Innocenti, the first hospital for foundlings in Europe; swaddled babes are the subject of Andrea della Robbia's roundels above the arches. Then the following statement: "The orphan hospital in Europe had an enormous number of patients in its first year." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
54,444
54444c
(He quotes himself in his books, the sure sign of a towering ego.)
( -LRB- ( He ( ( ( ( ( ( quotes himself ) ( in ( his books ) ) ) , ) ( ( the ( sure sign ) ) ( of ( a ( towering ego ) ) ) ) ) . ) -RRB- ) ) )
(ROOT (S (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ quotes) (NP (PRP himself)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS books))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ sure) (NN sign)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (JJ towering) (NN ego))))) (. .) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
Not once does he speak about himself in his writing because he is so humble.
( ( Not once ) ( ( ( does he ) ( ( ( speak ( about himself ) ) ( in ( his writing ) ) ) ( because ( he ( is ( so humble ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB Not) (RB once)) (VBZ does) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VB speak) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP himself))) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN writing))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ humble)))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: (He quotes himself in his books, the sure sign of a towering ego.) Then the following statement: "Not once does he speak about himself in his writing because he is so humble." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
99,715
99715n
This serene, arcaded palace, with its garden of lime trees and beeches and the pond where Louis XIV nearly drowned has had a past as colorful as its spectacular new flower beds.
( ( ( ( This ( ( serene ( , arcaded ) ) palace ) ) , ) ( with ( ( ( ( its garden ) ( of ( lime ( ( trees and ) beeches ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( the pond ) ( where ( ( Louis XIV ) ( nearly drowned ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( has ( had ( ( a past ) ( as ( ( colorful ( as ( its ( spectacular ( new flower ) ) ) ) ) beds ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT This) (ADJP (JJ serene) (, ,) (JJ arcaded)) (NN palace)) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN garden)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ lime) (NNS trees) (CC and) (NNS beeches)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN pond)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (NNP Louis) (NNP XIV)) (ADVP (RB nearly)) (VP (VBD drowned)))))))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN had) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN past)) (PP (IN as) (NP (ADJP (JJ colorful) (PP (IN as) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ spectacular) (JJ new) (NN flower)))) (NNS beds)))))) (. .)))
The pond where Louis XIV almost drowned is located within a palace.
( ( ( The pond ) ( where ( ( Louis XIV ) ( almost drowned ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( located ( within ( a palace ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN pond)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (NNP Louis) (NNP XIV)) (ADVP (RB almost)) (VP (VBD drowned))))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN located) (PP (IN within) (NP (DT a) (NN palace))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: This serene, arcaded palace, with its garden of lime trees and beeches and the pond where Louis XIV nearly drowned has had a past as colorful as its spectacular new flower beds. Then the following statement: "The pond where Louis XIV almost drowned is located within a palace." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
102,416
102416n
The stage was now set for the French West Indies' greatest hero, Victor Schoelcher.
( ( The stage ) ( ( ( was now ) ( set ( for ( ( ( ( the ( French ( West ( Indies ' ) ) ) ) ( greatest hero ) ) , ) ( Victor Schoelcher ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN stage)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB now)) (VP (VBN set) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP French) (NNP West) (NNP Indies) (POS ')) (JJS greatest) (NN hero)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Victor) (NNP Schoelcher)))))) (. .)))
Victor was a successful hero.
( Victor ( ( was ( a ( successful hero ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Victor)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (JJ successful) (NN hero))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The stage was now set for the French West Indies' greatest hero, Victor Schoelcher. Then the following statement: "Victor was a successful hero." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
67,545
67545c
i like Penn State my dad both my mom and dad went to Penn State so
( ( ( i ( like ( Penn State ) ) ) ( my dad ) ) ( both ( ( my ( ( mom and ) dad ) ) ( ( went ( to ( Penn State ) ) ) so ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VP (VBD i) (PP (IN like) (NP (NNP Penn) (NNP State)))) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN dad)) (SBAR (WHNP (DT both)) (S (NP (PRP$ my) (NN mom) (CC and) (NN dad)) (VP (VBD went) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Penn) (NNP State))) (ADVP (RB so)))))))
I like UCLA and my parents went to Berkley.
( I ( ( like ( ( UCLA and ) ( my parents ) ) ) ( ( went ( to Berkley ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (NNP UCLA)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ my) (NNS parents)))) (VP (VBD went) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Berkley)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i like Penn State my dad both my mom and dad went to Penn State so Then the following statement: "I like UCLA and my parents went to Berkley." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
84,684
84684n
On the airport side of town, there are several luxury hotels, and one of these, on the lake itself, is reached by a hand-drawn ferry.
( ( On ( ( the ( airport side ) ) ( of town ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( ( ( there ( are ( several ( luxury hotels ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( ( ( ( one ( of these ) ) , ) ( on ( ( the lake ) itself ) ) ) , ) ( is ( reached ( by ( a ( hand-drawn ferry ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN airport) (NN side)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN town))))) (, ,) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (JJ several) (NN luxury) (NNS hotels)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT these))) (, ,) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN lake)) (ADVP (PRP itself)))) (, ,)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN reached) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT a) (JJ hand-drawn) (NN ferry)))))) (. .)))
Other luxury hotels are on the opposite side of the town.
( ( Other ( luxury hotels ) ) ( ( are ( on ( ( the ( opposite side ) ) ( of ( the town ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Other) (NN luxury) (NNS hotels)) (VP (VBP are) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ opposite) (NN side)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN town)))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: On the airport side of town, there are several luxury hotels, and one of these, on the lake itself, is reached by a hand-drawn ferry. Then the following statement: "Other luxury hotels are on the opposite side of the town. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
112,552
112552n
yeah and that was real tough for him and there were some times on the show where there were some real emotional things going on with the
( ( ( yeah and ) that ) ( ( ( ( ( was ( real tough ) ) ( for him ) ) and ) ( there ( were ( ( some times ) ( on ( the show ) ) ) ) ) ) ( where ( there ( were ( ( some ( real ( emotional things ) ) ) ( ( going on ) ( with the ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN yeah)) (CC and) (NP (DT that))) (VP (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB real) (JJ tough)) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP him)))) (CC and) (VP (ADVP (RB there)) (VBD were) (NP (NP (DT some) (NNS times)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN show))))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (NP (DT some) (JJ real) (JJ emotional) (NNS things)) (VP (VBG going) (PRT (RP on)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the)))))))))))
He had trouble coping with his emotions because the show was so similar to his real life.
( He ( ( had ( trouble ( ( coping ( with ( his emotions ) ) ) ( because ( ( the show ) ( was ( so ( similar ( to ( his ( real life ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (NN trouble)) (VP (VBG coping) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS emotions))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT the) (NN show)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ similar) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ real) (NN life)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah and that was real tough for him and there were some times on the show where there were some real emotional things going on with the Then the following statement: "He had trouble coping with his emotions because the show was so similar to his real life. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
123,613
123613n
The old man picked it up in his hand, petted it and carried it toward Dave.
( ( The ( old man ) ) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( picked it ) up ) ( in ( his hand ) ) ) , ) ( petted it ) ) and ) ( ( carried it ) ( toward Dave ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ old) (NN man)) (VP (VP (VBD picked) (NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN hand)))) (, ,) (VP (VBD petted) (NP (PRP it))) (CC and) (VP (VBD carried) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN toward) (NP (NNP Dave))))) (. .)))
The rabbit twitched but then lied still in the old man's hand.
( ( The rabbit ) ( ( ( twitched but ) ( then ( ( lied still ) ( in ( ( the ( old ( man 's ) ) ) hand ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN rabbit)) (VP (VP (VBD twitched)) (CC but) (VP (ADVP (RB then)) (VBD lied) (ADVP (RB still)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ old) (NN man) (POS 's)) (NN hand))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The old man picked it up in his hand, petted it and carried it toward Dave. Then the following statement: "The rabbit twitched but then lied still in the old man's hand." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
71,524
71524n
Many News Quiz participants suggest that the entire Bush campaign is an ad for which we do not know the product.
( ( Many ( News ( Quiz participants ) ) ) ( ( suggest ( that ( ( the ( entire ( Bush campaign ) ) ) ( is ( ( an ad ) ( ( for which ) ( we ( ( do not ) ( know ( the product ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Many) (NNP News) (NNP Quiz) (NNS participants)) (VP (VBP suggest) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ entire) (NNP Bush) (NN campaign)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN ad)) (SBAR (WHPP (IN for) (WHNP (WDT which))) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP do) (RB not) (VP (VB know) (NP (DT the) (NN product))))))))))) (. .)))
The Bush campaign has suggestions of a reliable product.
( ( The ( Bush campaign ) ) ( ( has ( suggestions ( of ( a ( reliable product ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Bush) (NN campaign)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (NNS suggestions)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (JJ reliable) (NN product))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Many News Quiz participants suggest that the entire Bush campaign is an ad for which we do not know the product. Then the following statement: "The Bush campaign has suggestions of a reliable product." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
43,937
43937n
He is also Rama, the model prince and star of the Ramayana epic, and Krishna, a lusty hero who is the central figure of the Bhagavad Gita, a section of the Mahabharata epic.
( He ( ( ( is also ) ( ( ( ( ( Rama , ) ( ( the ( model ( ( prince and ) star ) ) ) ( of ( the ( Ramayana epic ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( Krishna , ) ( ( a ( lusty hero ) ) ( who ( is ( ( the ( central figure ) ) ( of ( ( ( the ( Bhagavad Gita ) ) , ) ( ( a section ) ( of ( the ( Mahabharata epic ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB also)) (NP (NP (NNP Rama)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN model) (NN prince) (CC and) (NN star)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Ramayana) (NN epic)))) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNP Krishna)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ lusty) (NN hero)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ central) (NN figure)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Bhagavad) (NNP Gita)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN section)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Mahabharata) (NN epic)))))))))))))) (. .)))
Rama and Krishna had formerly been married prior to the Ramayana epic.
( ( ( Rama and ) Krishna ) ( ( ( had formerly ) ( been ( married ( prior ( to ( the ( Ramayana epic ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Rama) (CC and) (NNP Krishna)) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB formerly)) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN married) (PP (RB prior) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Ramayana) (NN epic))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He is also Rama, the model prince and star of the Ramayana epic, and Krishna, a lusty hero who is the central figure of the Bhagavad Gita, a section of the Mahabharata epic. Then the following statement: "Rama and Krishna had formerly been married prior to the Ramayana epic." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
107,844
107844n
That is not going to be proven true.
( That ( ( ( is not ) ( going ( to ( be ( proven true ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN proven) (S (ADJP (JJ true))))))))) (. .)))
That isn't going to be proven yet.
( That ( ( ( is n't ) ( going ( to ( be ( proven yet ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB n't) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN proven) (ADVP (RB yet)))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: That is not going to be proven true. Then the following statement: "That isn't going to be proven yet." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
51,310
51310c
The rule is that you must be psychologically and physiologically identical to our profiles of Benjamin Franklin, as close to indistinguishable as possible.'
( ( The rule ) ( ( ( is ( that ( you ( must ( ( be ( ( ( ( ( psychologically and ) ( physiologically ( identical ( to ( ( our profiles ) ( of ( Benjamin Franklin ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) as ) ( close ( to indistinguishable ) ) ) ) ( as possible ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ' ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN rule)) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (ADJP (JJ psychologically)) (CC and) (ADJP (RB physiologically) (JJ identical) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (PRP$ our) (NNS profiles)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Benjamin) (NNP Franklin)))))) (, ,) (RB as) (ADJP (JJ close) (TO to) (JJ indistinguishable))) (PP (IN as) (ADJP (JJ possible)))))))) (. .) ('' ')))
You don't have to be anything like Ben Franklin.
( You ( ( ( do n't ) ( have ( to ( be ( anything ( like ( Ben Franklin ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (NN anything)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NNP Ben) (NNP Franklin))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The rule is that you must be psychologically and physiologically identical to our profiles of Benjamin Franklin, as close to indistinguishable as possible.' Then the following statement: "You don't have to be anything like Ben Franklin." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
94,606
94606n
Tysons Corner has all the answers . Wondering what's on sale?
( ( ( Tysons ( Corner ( has ( all ( the answers ) ) ) ) ) . ) ( Wondering ( ( what ( 's ( on sale ) ) ) ? ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (NP (NNS Tysons)) (SBAR (S (NP (NN Corner)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (PDT all) (DT the) (NNS answers))))) (. .)) (X (NP (NNP Wondering)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN sale))))) (. ?)))))
There's nothing Tysons Corner doesn't know.
( There ( ( 's ( nothing ( ( Tysons Corner ) ( ( does n't ) know ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (NN nothing)) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Tysons) (NNP Corner)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB know))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Tysons Corner has all the answers . Wondering what's on sale? Then the following statement: "There's nothing Tysons Corner doesn't know." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
99,597
99597c
now are if you if you if you pay your your monthly charge do you then pay separately for classes you're taking
( now ( are ( if ( ( you ( if ( ( you ( if ( you ( ( pay your ) ( your ( monthly charge ) ) ) ) ) ) ( do ( you ( then ( ( pay separately ) ( for classes ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( 're taking ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB now)) (VP (VBP are)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (SBAR (NP (PRP you)) (IN if) (S (NP (NP (PRP you)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB pay) (NP (PRP$ your)) (NP (PRP$ your) (JJ monthly) (NN charge)))))) (VP (VBP do) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB then)) (VP (VBP pay) (ADVP (RB separately)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS classes))))))))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG taking)))))))
I see, so the classes are free even without the monthly charge?
( ( ( ( ( I see ) , ) so ) ( ( the classes ) ( are ( free ( even ( without ( the ( monthly charge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP see))) (, ,) (IN so) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS classes)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ free) (PP (RB even) (IN without) (NP (DT the) (JJ monthly) (NN charge)))))) (. ?)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: now are if you if you if you pay your your monthly charge do you then pay separately for classes you're taking Then the following statement: "I see, so the classes are free even without the monthly charge?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
95,443
95443c
'My job is to organise.'
( ` ( ( My job ) ( ( ( is ( to organise ) ) . ) ' ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` `) (NP (PRP$ My) (NN job)) (VP (VBZ is) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB organise))))) (. .) ('' ')))
My job is to shuttle people back and forth by bus.
( ( My job ) ( ( ( is ( to ( ( shuttle people ) ( ( back and ) forth ) ) ) ) ( by bus ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NN job)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NN shuttle) (NNS people)) (ADVP (RB back) (CC and) (RB forth)))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN bus)))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 'My job is to organise.' Then the following statement: "My job is to shuttle people back and forth by bus." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
20,159
20159c
Market prices per tael (34 grams/1.2 ounces) of gold are set daily.
( ( ( Market prices ) ( per ( ( ( ( tael -LRB- ) ( 34 ( grams/1 ( .2 ounces ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ( of gold ) ) ) ) ( ( are ( set daily ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN Market) (NNS prices)) (PP (IN per) (NP (NP (NP (NN tael)) (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (CD 34) (JJ grams/1) (CD .2) (NNS ounces)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN gold)))))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN set) (ADVP (RB daily)))) (. .)))
The price of gold only changes once per month.
( ( ( The price ) ( of gold ) ) ( only ( ( ( changes once ) ( per month ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN price)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN gold)))) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VBZ changes) (ADVP (RB once)) (PP (IN per) (NP (NN month)))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Market prices per tael (34 grams/1.2 ounces) of gold are set daily. Then the following statement: "The price of gold only changes once per month." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
100,390
100390c
The floral decorations defied the seasons, and fruits of the earth as far apart as May and November found themselves miraculously side by side.
( ( The ( floral decorations ) ) ( ( ( defied ( ( ( ( the seasons ) , ) and ) ( fruits ( of ( the earth ) ) ) ) ) ( ( as ( far apart ) ) ( as ( ( ( May and ) November ) ( ( found ( themselves ( miraculously side ) ) ) ( by side ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ floral) (NNS decorations)) (VP (VBD defied) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS seasons)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNS fruits)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN earth))))) (ADVP (ADVP (RB as) (RB far) (RB apart)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NNP May) (CC and) (NNP November)) (VP (VBD found) (NP (PRP themselves) (JJ miraculously) (NN side)) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN side)))))))) (. .)))
The floral decorations had fruits from one season only.
( ( The ( floral decorations ) ) ( ( ( had ( fruits ( from ( one season ) ) ) ) only ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ floral) (NNS decorations)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (NNS fruits)) (PP (IN from) (NP (CD one) (NN season)))) (ADVP (RB only))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The floral decorations defied the seasons, and fruits of the earth as far apart as May and November found themselves miraculously side by side. Then the following statement: "The floral decorations had fruits from one season only." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
107,561
107561e
and you want to make sure that it's done right and put back together right and you know i've i've in the past i've had brake jobs done by someone that when i went back and and looked at it some months later i'd find something drastically wrong with it
( and ( you ( want ( to ( ( make sure ) ( that ( ( ( it ( 's ( ( ( done right ) and ) ( ( put back ) ( together right ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( you ( know ( i ( 've ( i ( ( 've ( in ( the ( past i ) ) ) ) ( 've ( ( had ( ( brake jobs ) ( done ( by someone ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( when ( i ( ( ( ( went back ) and ) and ) ( ( looked ( at it ) ) ( some months ) ) ) ) ) ( later ( i ( 'd ( ( find something ) ( drastically ( wrong ( with it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (ADJP (JJ sure)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VP (VBN done) (ADVP (RB right))) (CC and) (VP (VBN put) (PRT (RP back)) (ADVP (RB together) (RB right)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 've) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP 've) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ past) (NN i))) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN had) (S (NP (NNP brake) (NNS jobs)) (VP (VBN done) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN someone))))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP back)) (NP (NNP and))) (CC and) (VP (VBD looked) (PP (IN at) (NP (PRP it))) (NP (DT some) (NNS months)))))) (ADVP (RB later)) (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VB find) (NP (NN something)) (ADVP (RB drastically) (JJ wrong) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP it))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
You need to be sure that your repairs are done right, since I've had brake repairs done and then, months later, have another problem.
( ( ( ( You ( need ( to ( ( be sure ) ( that ( ( your repairs ) ( are ( ( ( done right ) , ) ( since ( I ( 've ( had ( ( brake repairs ) done ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( then ( , ( ( months later ) ( , ( have ( another problem ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ sure)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP$ your) (NNS repairs)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN done) (ADVP (RB right)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN since) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN had) (NP (NP (JJ brake) (NNS repairs)) (VP (VBN done)))))))))))))))) (CC and) (S (ADVP (RB then)) (, ,) (ADVP (NP (NNS months)) (RB later)) (, ,) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT another) (NN problem)))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and you want to make sure that it's done right and put back together right and you know i've i've in the past i've had brake jobs done by someone that when i went back and and looked at it some months later i'd find something drastically wrong with it Then the following statement: "You need to be sure that your repairs are done right, since I've had brake repairs done and then, months later, have another problem." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
99,242
99242n
He also said that EPA had created web sites for several rules that were used in conjunction with SBREFA panels to pull together information that commenters needed.
( He ( also ( ( said ( that ( EPA ( had ( ( created ( web sites ) ) ( for ( ( several rules ) ( that ( were ( ( used ( in ( conjunction ( with ( SBREFA panels ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( ( pull together ) information ) ( that ( commenters needed ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP EPA)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN created) (NP (NN web) (NNS sites)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ several) (NNS rules)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN used) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN conjunction)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNP SBREFA) (NNS panels))))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB pull) (PRT (RP together)) (NP (NN information)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS commenters)) (VP (VBD needed)))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
The websites were easy to use.
( ( The websites ) ( ( were ( easy ( to use ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS websites)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ easy) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB use)))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He also said that EPA had created web sites for several rules that were used in conjunction with SBREFA panels to pull together information that commenters needed. Then the following statement: "The websites were easy to use. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
18,430
18430c
oh i see so if you have fresh dirt they'll
( ( oh i ) ( see ( so ( if ( you ( have ( ( fresh dirt ) ( they ( ` ll ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP oh) (NNP i)) (VP (VBP see) (SBAR (RB so) (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (JJ fresh) (NN dirt)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (`` `) (VP (VBP ll)))))))))))
Oh I see if you have fresh grass they will
( ( Oh I ) ( see ( if ( you ( have ( ( fresh grass ) ( they will ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VBZ Oh) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (JJ fresh) (NN grass)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD will)))))))))))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: oh i see so if you have fresh dirt they'll Then the following statement: "Oh I see if you have fresh grass they will" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
139,941
139941n
and after having sat for twenty or thirty minutes and i get up and walk over to that and sat down and they took it it was pretty low like it usually is it it stays real low
( and ( after ( having ( ( ( ( sat ( for ( ( ( twenty ( or ( thirty minutes ) ) ) and ) i ) ) ) ( ( ( get up ) and ) ( ( walk over ) ( to that ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( sat down ) ( and ( they ( ( took it ) ( it ( was ( pretty low ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( like ( it ( usually ( is ( it ( it ( stays ( real low ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (PP (IN after) (S (VP (VBG having) (VP (VP (VBN sat) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (CD twenty) (CC or) (CD thirty) (NNS minutes)) (CC and) (NP (FW i)))) (S (VP (VP (VB get) (PRT (RP up))) (CC and) (VP (VB walk) (PRT (RP over)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT that))))))) (CC and) (VP (VBN sat) (PRT (RP down)) (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD took) (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ low)))))))) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB usually)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ stays) (ADJP (RB real) (JJ low))))))))))))))))
I would only get to walk for a few minutes everyday.
( I ( ( ( would only ) ( get ( to ( ( walk ( for ( a ( few minutes ) ) ) ) everyday ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VB get) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB walk) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (NNS minutes))) (NP (NN everyday))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and after having sat for twenty or thirty minutes and i get up and walk over to that and sat down and they took it it was pretty low like it usually is it it stays real low Then the following statement: "I would only get to walk for a few minutes everyday." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
112,944
112944n
The Scots refused, and Henry sent an army rampaging through Scotland on a campaign known as the Rough Wooing.
( ( ( ( ( ( The Scots ) refused ) , ) and ) ( Henry ( ( ( sent ( an ( army rampaging ) ) ) ( through Scotland ) ) ( on ( ( a campaign ) ( known ( as ( the ( Rough Wooing ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NNPS Scots)) (VP (VBD refused))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NNP Henry)) (VP (VBD sent) (NP (DT an) (NN army) (NN rampaging)) (PP (IN through) (NP (NNP Scotland))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN campaign)) (VP (VBN known) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT the) (NNP Rough) (NNP Wooing)))))))) (. .)))
Many horses died in Henry's Rough Wooing campaign.
( ( Many horses ) ( ( died ( in ( ( Henry 's ) ( Rough ( Wooing campaign ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Many) (NNS horses)) (VP (VBD died) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Henry) (POS 's)) (NNP Rough) (NNP Wooing) (NN campaign)))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Scots refused, and Henry sent an army rampaging through Scotland on a campaign known as the Rough Wooing. Then the following statement: "Many horses died in Henry's Rough Wooing campaign. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
123,035
123035c
yeah yeah they're scattered all over really you got them in Iran and Turkey and they sort of just meander around but they they hold true that Northern Iraq is theirs and uh i don't know it it was certainly foreseeable right after the war i mean it should have been obvious if it it was obvious to me it should have been obvious to the people in Washington there should have been some plans to
( yeah ( yeah ( ( ( ( they ( 're ( scattered ( all ( ( over ( ( ( really ( you ( ( got them ) ( in ( ( Iran and ) Turkey ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( they ( sort ( of ( just meander ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( around but ) they ) ) ) ) ) ) ( they ( hold ( true ( that ( ( ( ( Northern Iraq ) ( is theirs ) ) and ) ( uh ( i ( ( do n't ) ( know it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( it ( ( ( was certainly ) ( foreseeable right ) ) ( after ( ( the ( war i ) ) ( mean ( it ( should ( have ( ( been ( obvious ( if it ) ) ) ( it ( was ( obvious ( to me ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( it ( should ( have ( ( been ( obvious ( to ( ( the people ) ( in Washington ) ) ) ) ) ( there ( should ( have ( ( been ( some plans ) ) to ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (VP (VB yeah) (S (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBN scattered) (PP (ADVP (DT all)) (IN over) (S (S (ADVP (RB really)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD got) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Iran) (CC and) (NNP Turkey))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP they)) (NP (NP (NN sort)) (PP (IN of) (NP (RB just) (NN meander)))))) (PP (IN around) (CC but) (NP (PRP they))))))) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP hold) (ADJP (JJ true) (SBAR (IN that) (S (S (NP (NNP Northern) (NNP Iraq)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (PRP theirs)))) (CC and) (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (NP (PRP it)))))))))) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB certainly)) (NP (JJ foreseeable) (NN right)) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (DT the) (NN war) (NN i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (JJ obvious) (SBAR (IN if) (FRAG (NP (PRP it))))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ obvious) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP me))))))))))))))))) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (JJ obvious) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Washington)))))) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (NP (DT some) (NNS plans)) (PP (TO to))))))))))))))))
They don't hold anything and they're mostly in South Iraq.
( ( ( ( They ( ( do n't ) ( hold anything ) ) ) and ) ( they ( ( 're mostly ) ( in ( South Iraq ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB hold) (NP (NN anything))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADVP (RB mostly)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP South) (NNP Iraq))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah yeah they're scattered all over really you got them in Iran and Turkey and they sort of just meander around but they they hold true that Northern Iraq is theirs and uh i don't know it it was certainly foreseeable right after the war i mean it should have been obvious if it it was obvious to me it should have been obvious to the people in Washington there should have been some plans to Then the following statement: "They don't hold anything and they're mostly in South Iraq." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
51,529
51529c
we'll small maybe do our small part to fix them up
( we ( ( 'll ( small maybe ) ) ( ( do ( our ( small part ) ) ) ( to ( ( fix them ) up ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD 'll) (ADVP (ADJP (JJ small)) (ADVP (RB maybe))) (VP (VB do) (NP (PRP$ our) (JJ small) (NN part)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB fix) (NP (PRP them)) (PRT (RP up)))))))))
We will play a big role in getting them fixed up.
( We ( ( will ( ( play ( a ( big role ) ) ) ( in ( getting ( them ( fixed up ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB play) (NP (DT a) (JJ big) (NN role)) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG getting) (S (NP (PRP them)) (VP (VBN fixed) (PRT (RP up))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: we'll small maybe do our small part to fix them up Then the following statement: "We will play a big role in getting them fixed up." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
86,929
86929e
With so many new boats having been built in the same old style, boasting lovely Kashmiri carvings on the bridge and decks, many are too heavy to move around the waters.
( ( With ( ( ( so many ) ( new boats ) ) ( having ( been ( ( ( built ( in ( the ( same ( old style ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( boasting ( lovely ( Kashmiri carvings ) ) ) ( on ( ( ( the bridge ) and ) decks ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( many ( ( are ( too ( heavy ( to ( ( move around ) ( the waters ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN With) (S (NP (ADJP (RB so) (JJ many)) (JJ new) (NNS boats)) (VP (VBG having) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (JJ old) (NN style))) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG boasting) (NP (JJ lovely) (NNP Kashmiri) (NNS carvings)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN bridge)) (CC and) (NP (NNS decks))))))))))) (, ,) (NP (DT many)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB too) (JJ heavy) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB move) (PRT (RP around)) (NP (DT the) (NNS waters))))))) (. .)))
The newer boats have been made in the style of the old though some are to heavy to maneuver the waters.
( ( The ( newer boats ) ) ( ( have ( been ( ( made ( in ( ( the style ) ( of ( the old ) ) ) ) ) ( though ( some ( ( are ( to heavy ) ) ( to ( maneuver ( the waters ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJR newer) (NNS boats)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN style)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ old))))) (SBAR (IN though) (S (NP (DT some)) (VP (VBP are) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN heavy))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB maneuver) (NP (DT the) (NNS waters))))))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: With so many new boats having been built in the same old style, boasting lovely Kashmiri carvings on the bridge and decks, many are too heavy to move around the waters. Then the following statement: "The newer boats have been made in the style of the old though some are to heavy to maneuver the waters. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
75,923
75923n
well you you you think you think that's worse than than having the Mexicans come across the border and work in the factory of the United States and take jobs away from Americans
( ( well you ) ( you ( you ( think ( you ( think ( that ( ( 's ( worse than ) ) ( than ( having ( ( the Mexicans ) ( ( ( ( ( come ( across ( the border ) ) ) and ) ( work ( in ( ( the factory ) ( of ( the ( United States ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( take jobs ) away ) ( from Americans ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (X (X (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (PRP you))) (NP (NP (PRP you)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RBR worse) (IN than)) (PP (IN than) (S (VP (VBG having) (S (NP (DT the) (NNPS Mexicans)) (VP (VP (VB come) (PP (IN across) (NP (DT the) (NN border)))) (CC and) (VP (VB work) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN factory)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP United) (NNPS States)))))) (CC and) (VP (VB take) (NP (NNS jobs)) (PRT (RP away)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNPS Americans)))))))))))))))))))))
Yes I do, those dirty Mexicans need to stay where they belong.
( ( Yes ( I do ) ) ( , ( ( those ( dirty Mexicans ) ) ( ( need ( to ( stay ( where ( they belong ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (INTJ (UH Yes)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do))) (, ,) (NP (DT those) (JJ dirty) (NNPS Mexicans)) (VP (VBP need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB stay) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP belong)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well you you you think you think that's worse than than having the Mexicans come across the border and work in the factory of the United States and take jobs away from Americans Then the following statement: "Yes I do, those dirty Mexicans need to stay where they belong." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
79,262
79262n
'Daniel,' I snapped.
( ` ( Daniel ( , ( ' ( I ( snapped . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` `) (NP (NNP Daniel)) (, ,) ('' ') (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD snapped)) (. .)))
Daniel was dangerously playing with fire.
( Daniel ( ( was ( dangerously ( playing ( with fire ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Daniel)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB dangerously) (S (VP (VBG playing) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN fire))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 'Daniel,' I snapped. Then the following statement: "Daniel was dangerously playing with fire." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
107,036
107036c
Do you have any suggestions?
( ( ( Do you ) ( have ( any suggestions ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (SQ (VBP Do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT any) (NNS suggestions))) (. ?)))
I don't want to hear your ideas.
( I ( ( ( do n't ) ( want ( to ( hear ( your ideas ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB hear) (NP (PRP$ your) (NNS ideas))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Do you have any suggestions? Then the following statement: "I don't want to hear your ideas." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
25,324
25324n
He added, "One does not sell a friend." Oliveri gave what sounded to Drew like an exaggerated sigh.
( ( He ( ( ( added , ) `` ) ( One ( ( ( ( does not ) ( sell ( a friend ) ) ) . ) '' ) ) ) ) ( Oliveri ( ( gave ( what ( ( sounded ( to Drew ) ) ( like ( an ( exaggerated sigh ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD added) (, ,) (`` ``) (S (NP (PRP One)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB not) (VP (VB sell) (NP (DT a) (NN friend)))) (. .) ('' '')))) (NP (NNP Oliveri)) (VP (VBD gave) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBD sounded) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Drew))) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT an) (JJ exaggerated) (NN sigh))))))) (. .)))
Drew was unwilling to sell his best friend.
( Drew ( ( was ( unwilling ( to ( sell ( his ( best friend ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Drew)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ unwilling) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB sell) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJS best) (NN friend))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He added, "One does not sell a friend." Oliveri gave what sounded to Drew like an exaggerated sigh. Then the following statement: "Drew was unwilling to sell his best friend." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
104,817
104817n
Majority Whip Tom DeLay, another Texan, is Armey's opposite--the Republican Jim Wright.
( ( ( ( ( Majority ( Whip ( Tom DeLay ) ) ) , ) ( another Texan ) ) , ) ( ( is ( ( ( ( Armey 's ) opposite ) -- ) ( the ( Republican ( Jim Wright ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Majority) (NNP Whip) (NNP Tom) (NNP DeLay)) (, ,) (ADJP (DT another) (JJ Texan)) (, ,)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Armey) (POS 's)) (NN opposite)) (: --) (NP (DT the) (NNP Republican) (NNP Jim) (NNP Wright)))) (. .)))
It's expected that Tom DeLay and Jim Wright may end up having to collaborate before the end of term.
( It ( ( 's ( expected ( that ( ( Tom ( DeLay ( and ( Jim Wright ) ) ) ) ( may ( ( end up ) ( having ( to ( collaborate ( before ( ( the end ) ( of term ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN expected) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Tom) (NNP DeLay) (CC and) (NNP Jim) (NNP Wright)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB end) (PRT (RP up)) (S (VP (VBG having) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB collaborate) (PP (IN before) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN end)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN term)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Majority Whip Tom DeLay, another Texan, is Armey's opposite--the Republican Jim Wright. Then the following statement: "It's expected that Tom DeLay and Jim Wright may end up having to collaborate before the end of term." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
107,125
107125e
The body, in a white shroud, is carried on a bier of bamboo to the river's edge, where a few drops of Ganga water are poured into the lips of the dead.
( ( ( ( ( The body ) , ) ( in ( a ( white shroud ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( is ( ( carried ( on ( ( a bier ) ( of bamboo ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( ( ( the ( river 's ) ) edge ) , ) ( where ( ( ( a ( few drops ) ) ( of ( Ganga water ) ) ) ( are ( poured ( into ( ( the lips ) ( of ( the dead ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN body)) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (JJ white) (NN shroud))) (, ,)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN carried) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN bier)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN bamboo))))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN river) (POS 's)) (NN edge)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (NNS drops)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Ganga) (NN water)))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN poured) (PP (IN into) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS lips)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN dead))))))))))))) (. .)))
Water is poured onto dead people's lips after being brought to the river's edge.
( Water ( ( is ( ( poured ( onto ( ( dead ( people 's ) ) lips ) ) ) ( after ( being ( brought ( to ( ( the ( river 's ) ) edge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Water)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN poured) (PP (IN onto) (NP (NP (JJ dead) (NNS people) (POS 's)) (NNS lips))) (PP (IN after) (S (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN brought) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN river) (POS 's)) (NN edge))))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The body, in a white shroud, is carried on a bier of bamboo to the river's edge, where a few drops of Ganga water are poured into the lips of the dead. Then the following statement: "Water is poured onto dead people's lips after being brought to the river's edge." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
27,929
27929c
Needless to say, most of 'the field,' as we refer to the collective entity that constitutes our grantee programs, was already frightened and concerned because of the funding drops, new restrictions and competition fears.
( ( Needless ( to say ) ) ( , ( ( ( most ( of ( ` ( ( ( ( the field ) , ) ' ) ( as ( we ( refer ( to ( ( the ( collective entity ) ) ( that ( constitutes ( our ( grantee programs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( ( was already ) ( ( frightened and ) concerned ) ) ( because ( of ( ( ( ( ( the ( funding drops ) ) , ) ( new restrictions ) ) and ) ( competition fears ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (ADJP (JJ Needless) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB say)))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (JJS most)) (PP (IN of) (NP (`` `) (NP (DT the) (NN field)) (, ,) ('' ') (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP refer) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ collective) (NN entity)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ constitutes) (NP (PRP$ our) (JJ grantee) (NNS programs)))))))))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB already)) (ADJP (JJ frightened) (CC and) (JJ concerned)) (PP (RB because) (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN funding) (NNS drops)) (, ,) (NP (JJ new) (NNS restrictions)) (CC and) (NP (NN competition) (NNS fears))))) (. .)))
The grantees were excited to see an increase in funding.
( ( The grantees ) ( ( were ( excited ( to ( see ( ( an increase ) ( in funding ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS grantees)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ excited) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN increase)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN funding))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Needless to say, most of 'the field,' as we refer to the collective entity that constitutes our grantee programs, was already frightened and concerned because of the funding drops, new restrictions and competition fears. Then the following statement: "The grantees were excited to see an increase in funding." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
87,423
87423n
He has 1,008 names in Sanskrit literature.
( He ( ( has ( ( 1,008 names ) ( in ( Sanskrit literature ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (CD 1,008) (NNS names)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Sanskrit) (NN literature))))) (. .)))
The names were formerly limited to 1,000.
( ( The names ) ( ( ( were formerly ) ( limited ( to 1,000 ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS names)) (VP (VBD were) (ADVP (RB formerly)) (VP (VBN limited) (PP (TO to) (NP (CD 1,000))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He has 1,008 names in Sanskrit literature. Then the following statement: "The names were formerly limited to 1,000." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
143,020
143020n
For others, the climb is an exercise in self-discipline and physical purification.
( ( For others ) ( , ( ( the climb ) ( ( is ( ( an exercise ) ( in ( self-discipline ( and ( physical purification ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (NNS others))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN climb)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN exercise)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ self-discipline) (CC and) (JJ physical) (NN purification))))) (. .)))
The climb will help you get closer to God and nature.
( ( The climb ) ( ( will ( help ( you ( get ( closer ( to ( ( God and ) nature ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN climb)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB help) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB get) (ADJP (ADJP (JJR closer)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP God)) (CC and) (NP (NN nature))))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: For others, the climb is an exercise in self-discipline and physical purification. Then the following statement: "The climb will help you get closer to God and nature." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
52,030
52030e
If the couple would have otherwise spent the $4,000.
( ( If ( ( the couple ) would ) ) ( ( ( have otherwise ) ( spent ( the ( $ 4,000 ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (DT the) (NN couple)) (VP (MD would)))) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB otherwise)) (VP (VBN spent) (NP (DT the) ($ $) (CD 4,000)))) (. .)))
The couple would have spent $4000
( ( The couple ) ( would ( have ( spent ( $ 4000 ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN couple)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN spent) (NP ($ $) (CD 4000)))))))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: If the couple would have otherwise spent the $4,000. Then the following statement: "The couple would have spent $4000" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
96,260
96260e
They fought again.
( They ( ( fought again ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD fought) (ADVP (RB again))) (. .)))
They battled again.
( They ( ( battled again ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD battled) (ADVP (RB again))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: They fought again. Then the following statement: "They battled again." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
100,436
100436e
Flytrap also bears some responsibility for Washington's paralysis.
( Flytrap ( also ( ( bears ( ( some responsibility ) ( for ( ( Washington 's ) paralysis ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Flytrap)) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VBZ bears) (NP (NP (DT some) (NN responsibility)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNP Washington) (POS 's)) (NN paralysis))))) (. .)))
Washington's paralysis is partly due to Flytrap.
( ( ( Washington 's ) paralysis ) ( ( is ( partly ( due ( to Flytrap ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Washington) (POS 's)) (NN paralysis)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB partly) (JJ due) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Flytrap))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Flytrap also bears some responsibility for Washington's paralysis. Then the following statement: "Washington's paralysis is partly due to Flytrap." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
54,260
54260n
In the grounds of the Pamukkale Motel you can bathe in the Sacred Pool, where the therapeutic, restorative spring waters will float you above a picturesque jumble of broken columns and Corinthian capitals.
( ( In ( ( the grounds ) ( of ( the ( Pamukkale Motel ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( ( can ( bathe ( in ( ( ( the ( Sacred Pool ) ) , ) ( where ( ( the ( therapeutic ( , ( restorative ( spring waters ) ) ) ) ) ( will ( ( float you ) ( above ( ( a ( picturesque jumble ) ) ( of ( ( ( broken columns ) and ) ( Corinthian capitals ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS grounds)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Pamukkale) (NNP Motel))))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB bathe) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Sacred) (NNP Pool)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ therapeutic) (, ,) (JJ restorative) (NN spring) (NNS waters)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB float) (NP (PRP you)) (PP (IN above) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ picturesque) (NN jumble)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ broken) (NNS columns)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Corinthian) (NNP capitals)))))))))))))) (. .)))
Restorative spring waters will float you above the broken columns as well as many intact columns.
( ( Restorative ( spring waters ) ) ( ( will ( ( float you ) ( above ( ( ( the ( broken columns ) ) ( as ( well as ) ) ) ( many ( intact columns ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Restorative) (NN spring) (NNS waters)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB float) (NP (PRP you)) (PP (IN above) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ broken) (NNS columns)) (CONJP (RB as) (RB well) (IN as)) (NP (JJ many) (JJ intact) (NNS columns)))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In the grounds of the Pamukkale Motel you can bathe in the Sacred Pool, where the therapeutic, restorative spring waters will float you above a picturesque jumble of broken columns and Corinthian capitals. Then the following statement: "Restorative spring waters will float you above the broken columns as well as many intact columns." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
105,190
105190e
I was in the town of Orr, and a festival was being held; a little county fair with epic designs.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( I ( was ( in ( ( the town ) ( of Orr ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( a festival ) ( was ( being held ) ) ) ) ; ) ( ( a ( little county ) ) ( fair ( with ( epic designs ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN town)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Orr))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT a) (NN festival)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN held)))))) (: ;) (S (NP (DT a) (JJ little) (NN county)) (ADJP (JJ fair) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN epic) (NNS designs))))) (. .)))
There was a county fair in Orr.
( There ( ( was ( ( a ( county fair ) ) ( in Orr ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN county) (NN fair)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Orr))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I was in the town of Orr, and a festival was being held; a little county fair with epic designs. Then the following statement: "There was a county fair in Orr." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
118,199
118199n
Upstairs are a couple of rooms of Socialist Realism, with ubiquitous Maos--first, youthfully slender in front of a traditionally rendered mountain, then putting on weight just like those Buddhas.
( Upstairs ( ( ( ( are ( ( a couple ) ( of ( rooms ( of ( Socialist Realism ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( with ( ( ( ubiquitous Maos ) ( -- ( ( ( ( ( first ( , ( youthfully slender ) ) ) ( in front ) ) ( of ( a ( ( traditionally rendered ) mountain ) ) ) ) , ) then ) ) ) ( ( ( putting ( on weight ) ) just ) ( like ( those Buddhas ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Upstairs)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN couple)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS rooms)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Socialist) (NNP Realism)))))) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (JJ ubiquitous) (NNS Maos)) (PRN (: --) (NP (NP (JJ first) (, ,) (JJ youthfully) (NN slender)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN front))) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB traditionally) (VBN rendered)) (NN mountain)))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB then))) (VP (VBG putting) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN weight))) (ADVP (RB just)) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT those) (NNPS Buddhas))))))) (. .)))
The downstairs rooms get more visitors than the upstairs rooms.
( ( The ( downstairs rooms ) ) ( ( ( get ( more visitors ) ) ( than ( the ( upstairs rooms ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ downstairs) (NNS rooms)) (VP (VBP get) (NP (JJR more) (NNS visitors)) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT the) (NN upstairs) (NNS rooms)))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Upstairs are a couple of rooms of Socialist Realism, with ubiquitous Maos--first, youthfully slender in front of a traditionally rendered mountain, then putting on weight just like those Buddhas. Then the following statement: "The downstairs rooms get more visitors than the upstairs rooms." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
73,004
73004n
Portugal took up arms during World War I, siding with the British and French.
( Portugal ( ( ( ( ( took up ) arms ) ( during ( ( ( World ( War I ) ) , ) siding ) ) ) ( with ( the ( ( British and ) French ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Portugal)) (VP (VBD took) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (NNS arms)) (PP (IN during) (NP (NP (NNP World) (NNP War) (NNP I)) (, ,) (NP (NN siding)))) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (JJ British) (CC and) (JJ French)))) (. .)))
Portugal had a significant stake in WWI's outcome.
( Portugal ( ( had ( ( a ( significant stake ) ) ( in ( ( WWI 's ) outcome ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Portugal)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ significant) (NN stake)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP WWI) (POS 's)) (NN outcome))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Portugal took up arms during World War I, siding with the British and French. Then the following statement: "Portugal had a significant stake in WWI's outcome." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
85,818
85818n
Both are marvelous speakers.
( Both ( ( are ( marvelous speakers ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Both)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG marvelous) (NP (NNS speakers)))) (. .)))
Both of them will be selected to make a speech.
( ( Both ( of them ) ) ( ( will ( be ( selected ( to ( make ( a speech ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT Both)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP them)))) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN selected) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (DT a) (NN speech)))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Both are marvelous speakers. Then the following statement: "Both of them will be selected to make a speech." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
139,351
139351n
You have perhaps read these? Stein asked.
( ( You ( ( ( have perhaps ) ( read these ) ) ? ) ) ( Stein ( asked . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB perhaps)) (VP (VBN read) (NP (DT these)))) (. ?)) (NP (NNP Stein)) (VP (VBD asked)) (. .)))
Stein asked his girlfriend if she had read the books.
( Stein ( ( ( asked ( his girlfriend ) ) ( if ( she ( had ( read ( the books ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Stein)) (VP (VBD asked) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN girlfriend)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN read) (NP (DT the) (NNS books))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: You have perhaps read these? Stein asked. Then the following statement: "Stein asked his girlfriend if she had read the books." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
55,656
55656e
back during the Vietnam conflict that no one will will have the guts enough to call a real war uh
( ( back ( during ( the ( Vietnam conflict ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( no ( one will ) ) ( will ( have ( ( the guts ) ( enough ( to ( call ( a ( real ( war uh ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB back) (PP (IN during) (NP (DT the) (NNP Vietnam) (NN conflict)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT no) (CD one) (NN will)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB have) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS guts)) (ADJP (JJ enough) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB call) (NP (DT a) (JJ real) (NN war) (NN uh)))))))))))))
It took a lot for people to call the Vietnam conflict a war.
( It ( ( ( ( took ( a lot ) ) ( for people ) ) ( to ( ( call ( the ( Vietnam conflict ) ) ) ( a war ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBD took) (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS people))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB call) (NP (DT the) (NNP Vietnam) (NN conflict)) (NP (DT a) (NN war)))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: back during the Vietnam conflict that no one will will have the guts enough to call a real war uh Then the following statement: "It took a lot for people to call the Vietnam conflict a war." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
86,903
86903e
Typically, companies and their advisors try to minimize the visibility of such techniques in order to avoid public criticism.
( Typically ( , ( ( ( companies and ) ( their advisors ) ) ( ( try ( to ( ( minimize ( ( the visibility ) ( of ( such techniques ) ) ) ) ( ( in order ) ( to ( avoid ( public criticism ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Typically)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNS companies)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS advisors))) (VP (VBP try) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB minimize) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN visibility)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ such) (NNS techniques)))) (SBAR (IN in) (NN order) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB avoid) (NP (JJ public) (NN criticism)))))))))) (. .)))
Visibility of such techniques are minimized to decrease criticism.
( ( Visibility ( of ( such techniques ) ) ) ( ( are ( minimized ( to ( decrease criticism ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Visibility)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ such) (NNS techniques)))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN minimized) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB decrease) (NP (NN criticism))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Typically, companies and their advisors try to minimize the visibility of such techniques in order to avoid public criticism. Then the following statement: "Visibility of such techniques are minimized to decrease criticism." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
104,651
104651c
The Convent's other residents are refugees from bad marriages or abuse of one kind or another.
( ( ( The ( Convent 's ) ) ( other residents ) ) ( ( are ( ( ( refugees ( from ( bad marriages ) ) ) or ) ( abuse ( of ( ( ( one kind ) or ) another ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Convent) (POS 's)) (JJ other) (NNS residents)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NP (NNS refugees)) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ bad) (NNS marriages)))) (CC or) (NP (NP (NN abuse)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (CD one) (NN kind)) (CC or) (NP (DT another))))))) (. .)))
There are no abuse victims who have fled to the Convent.
( There ( ( are ( ( no ( abuse victims ) ) ( who ( have ( fled ( to ( the Convent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN abuse) (NNS victims)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN fled) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Convent))))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Convent's other residents are refugees from bad marriages or abuse of one kind or another. Then the following statement: "There are no abuse victims who have fled to the Convent." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
54,236
54236c
The girls wield branches of the holy sakaki tree and dance to an orchestra composed of wooden clappers (hyoshigi), plucked zither (koto), mouth organ (sho), and the oboe-like hichiriki, together with flute and drum.
( ( The girls ) ( ( ( ( ( ( wield ( branches ( of ( the ( holy ( sakaki tree ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( dance ( to ( ( an orchestra ) ( ( composed ( of ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( wooden clappers ) ( -LRB- ( hyoshigi -RRB- ) ) ) , ) ( ( plucked zither ) ( -LRB- ( koto -RRB- ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( mouth organ ) ( -LRB- ( sho -RRB- ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( ( the ( oboe-like hichiriki ) ) , ) together ) ) ) ) ( with flute ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) drum ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS girls)) (VP (VP (VB wield) (NP (NP (NNS branches)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ holy) (NN sakaki) (NN tree))))) (CC and) (VP (VB dance) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN orchestra)) (VP (VBN composed) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (JJ wooden) (NNS clappers)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP hyoshigi)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (, ,) (NP (NP (JJ plucked) (NN zither)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP koto)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN mouth) (NN organ)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NN sho)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ oboe-like) (NN hichiriki)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB together))))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN flute))))))) (CC and) (VP (VB drum))) (. .)))
Only the men are allowed to participate in the religious ceremonies.
( ( Only ( the men ) ) ( ( are ( allowed ( to ( participate ( in ( the ( religious ceremonies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (RB Only) (DT the) (NNS men)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN allowed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB participate) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ religious) (NNS ceremonies)))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The girls wield branches of the holy sakaki tree and dance to an orchestra composed of wooden clappers (hyoshigi), plucked zither (koto), mouth organ (sho), and the oboe-like hichiriki, together with flute and drum. Then the following statement: "Only the men are allowed to participate in the religious ceremonies." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
28,019
28019e
Now we have more strychnine, handled by one of the household.
( Now ( we ( ( ( ( have ( more strychnine ) ) , ) ( handled ( by ( one ( of ( the household ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Now)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (JJR more) (NN strychnine)) (, ,) (VP (VBN handled) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN household))))))) (. .)))
One of the household has handled strychnine.
( ( One ( of ( the household ) ) ) ( ( has ( handled strychnine ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (CD One)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN household)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN handled) (S (ADJP (JJ strychnine))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Now we have more strychnine, handled by one of the household. Then the following statement: "One of the household has handled strychnine." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
117,163
117163c
West of Damascus Gate and Highway 1 is the new city of West Jerusalem.
( ( West ( of ( ( ( Damascus Gate ) and ) ( Highway 1 ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( the ( new city ) ) ( of ( West Jerusalem ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP West)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Damascus) (NNP Gate)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Highway) (CD 1))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ new) (NN city)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP West) (NNP Jerusalem))))) (. .)))
Highway 1 is west of the new city of West Jerusalem.
( ( Highway 1 ) ( ( is ( west ( of ( ( the ( new city ) ) ( of ( West Jerusalem ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Highway) (CD 1)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NN west)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ new) (NN city)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP West) (NNP Jerusalem))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: West of Damascus Gate and Highway 1 is the new city of West Jerusalem. Then the following statement: "Highway 1 is west of the new city of West Jerusalem." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
80,000
80000c
There was that lieutenant with the supply wagons.
( There ( ( was ( ( that lieutenant ) ( with ( the ( supply wagons ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT that) (NN lieutenant)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN supply) (NNS wagons))))) (. .)))
The lieutenant had lost his supply wagons here.
( ( The lieutenant ) ( ( had ( ( lost ( his ( supply wagons ) ) ) here ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN lieutenant)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN lost) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN supply) (NNS wagons)) (ADVP (RB here)))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: There was that lieutenant with the supply wagons. Then the following statement: "The lieutenant had lost his supply wagons here." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
114,526
114526n
Its public interest law, Smith said.
( ( ( ( Its ( public ( interest law ) ) ) , ) Smith ) ( said . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (PRP$ Its) (JJ public) (NN interest) (NN law)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Smith))) (VP (VBD said)) (. .)))
Smith said he couldn't discuss it because it was public interest law.
( Smith ( ( said ( he ( ( could n't ) ( ( discuss it ) ( because ( it ( was ( public ( interest law ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Smith)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD could) (RB n't) (VP (VB discuss) (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (JJ public) (NN interest) (NN law)))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Its public interest law, Smith said. Then the following statement: "Smith said he couldn't discuss it because it was public interest law." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
67,338
67338c
Bush : Standards set by agencies that rely upon science.
( ( ( Bush : ) ( Standards ( set ( by ( agencies ( that ( rely ( upon science ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NNP Bush)) (: :) (NP (NP (NNP Standards)) (VP (VBN set) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNS agencies)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP rely) (PP (IN upon) (NP (NN science)))))))))) (. .)))
The agencies used no science at all when setting their standards.
( ( The agencies ) ( ( ( ( used ( no science ) ) ( at all ) ) ( when ( setting ( their standards ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS agencies)) (VP (VBD used) (NP (DT no) (NN science)) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (VP (VBG setting) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS standards)))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Bush : Standards set by agencies that rely upon science. Then the following statement: "The agencies used no science at all when setting their standards." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
122,533
122533n
right yeah there's a difference
( right ( yeah ( there ( 's ( a difference ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB right)) (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (NN difference))))))))
There is a glaring difference.
( There ( ( is ( a ( glaring difference ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (JJ glaring) (NN difference))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: right yeah there's a difference Then the following statement: "There is a glaring difference." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
76,006
76006e
To make this less of an issue, I have taken to cooking dinner for us at my place or drumming up occasions for dinner to be my treat.
( ( To ( make ( ( this less ) ( of ( an issue ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( I ( ( have ( taken ( to ( ( ( ( cooking ( dinner ( for us ) ) ) ( at ( my place ) ) ) or ) ( ( ( drumming up ) ( occasions ( for dinner ) ) ) ( to ( be ( my treat ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (TO To) (VP (VB make) (NP (NP (DT this) (JJR less)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT an) (NN issue))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN taken) (PP (TO to) (S (VP (VP (VBG cooking) (NP (NP (NN dinner)) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP us)))) (PP (IN at) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN place)))) (CC or) (VP (VBG drumming) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (NP (NNS occasions)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN dinner)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN treat))))))))))) (. .)))
I often cook dinner for us at my place or make up excuses to take them out to dinner in order to not make a big deal of this.
( I ( often ( ( ( ( ( cook ( dinner ( for us ) ) ) ( at ( my place ) ) ) or ) ( ( make up ) ( excuses ( to ( ( ( ( take them ) out ) ( to dinner ) ) ( ( in order ) ( ( to not ) ( make ( ( a ( big deal ) ) ( of this ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB often)) (VP (VP (VB cook) (NP (NP (NN dinner)) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP us)))) (PP (IN at) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN place)))) (CC or) (VP (VB make) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (NNS excuses) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB take) (NP (PRP them)) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN dinner))) (SBAR (IN in) (NN order) (S (VP (TO to) (RB not) (VP (VB make) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ big) (NN deal)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this)))))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: To make this less of an issue, I have taken to cooking dinner for us at my place or drumming up occasions for dinner to be my treat. Then the following statement: "I often cook dinner for us at my place or make up excuses to take them out to dinner in order to not make a big deal of this." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
21,151
21151c
well right now the place where i'm living the yard was basically neglected for the about the last twenty five years so i've been trying to rebuild and reestablish the entire lawn and after three years of working at it i've i've been amazed at just what a little bit of doing help out things to the lawn has really brought it back instead instead of mowing it the same direction every time changing one day you'll or one one one time you'll cut it cut the lawn the long way then you'll go the opposite way instead of going lengthways you go width and it helps the grass come back
( ( well ( right now ) ) ( ( the place ) ( where ( ( ( i ( 'm ( living ( ( ( ( ( the yard ) ( ( was basically ) ( ( neglected ( for ( the ( about ( the ( last twenty ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( five years ) ( so ( i ( 've ( been ( trying ( to ( ( ( rebuild and ) reestablish ) ( the ( entire lawn ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( after ( ( ( three years ) ( of ( ( working ( at it ) ) ( i ( 've i ) ) ) ) ) ( 've ( been ( amazed ( at ( ( just what ) ( ( ( a ( little bit ) ) ( of ( doing ( ( ( help out ) things ) ( to ( the lawn ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( has really ) ( ( brought it ) ( back ( instead ( instead ( of ( mowing ( it ( ( ( ( ( the ( same direction ) ) ( every time ) ) ( changing ( ( one day ) ( you 'll ) ) ) ) or ) ( ( one one ) ( one time ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( 'll ( cut ( it ( ( cut ( the lawn ) ) ( the ( long way ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( then ( you ( 'll ( ( go ( the ( opposite way ) ) ) ( instead ( of ( going lengthways ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( go width ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( it ( helps ( ( the grass ) ( come back ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB well) (RB right) (RB now)) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN place)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (VP (VBG living) (S (S (NP (DT the) (NN yard)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB basically)) (VP (VBN neglected) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT the)) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT the) (JJ last) (CD twenty))))) (SBAR (SBAR (NP (CD five) (NNS years)) (RB so) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBG trying) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB rebuild) (CC and) (VB reestablish) (NP (DT the) (JJ entire) (NN lawn)))))))))) (CC and) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (NP (CD three) (NNS years)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG working) (PP (IN at) (NP (PRP it))) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 've) (NP (FW i))))))))) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN amazed) (PP (IN at) (SBAR (WHADJP (RB just) (WP what)) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ little) (NN bit)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG doing) (S (VP (VB help) (PRT (RP out)) (NP (NNS things)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN lawn))))))))) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBN brought) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (ADVP (RB back)) (RB instead) (RB instead) (IN of) (S (VP (VBG mowing) (S (NP (PRP it)) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN direction)) (NP (DT every) (NN time)) (VP (VBG changing) (NP (NP (CD one) (NN day)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD 'll))))))) (CC or) (NP (NP (CD one) (CD one)) (NP (CD one) (NN time)))))))))))))))))))))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB cut) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VB cut) (NP (DT the) (NN lawn)) (NP (DT the) (JJ long) (NN way))))))) (S (ADVP (RB then)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB go) (NP (DT the) (JJ opposite) (NN way)) (PP (RB instead) (IN of) (S (VP (VBG going) (NP (NNS lengthways)))))))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP go) (NP (NN width)))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ helps) (S (NP (DT the) (NN grass)) (VP (VB come) (ADVP (RB back)))))))))))
The yard where I'm living is and always has been pristine.
( ( ( The yard ) ( where ( I ( 'm living ) ) ) ) ( ( ( is and ) ( always ( has ( been pristine ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN yard)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (VP (VBG living)))))) (VP (VP (VBZ is)) (CC and) (VP (ADVP (RB always)) (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (JJ pristine))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well right now the place where i'm living the yard was basically neglected for the about the last twenty five years so i've been trying to rebuild and reestablish the entire lawn and after three years of working at it i've i've been amazed at just what a little bit of doing help out things to the lawn has really brought it back instead instead of mowing it the same direction every time changing one day you'll or one one one time you'll cut it cut the lawn the long way then you'll go the opposite way instead of going lengthways you go width and it helps the grass come back Then the following statement: "The yard where I'm living is and always has been pristine." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
69,615
69615e
Ah, but he had no opportunity.
( Ah ( , ( but ( he ( ( had ( no opportunity ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (INTJ (UH Ah)) (, ,) (ADVP (CC but)) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (DT no) (NN opportunity))) (. .)))
He did not have the chance to do anything.
( He ( ( ( did not ) ( have ( the ( chance ( to ( do anything ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT the) (NN chance) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (NN anything)))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Ah, but he had no opportunity. Then the following statement: "He did not have the chance to do anything." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
44,911
44911n
Exposure Draft
( Exposure Draft )
(ROOT (NP (NNP Exposure) (NNP Draft)))
The Exposure Draft had been requested weeks ago.
( ( The ( Exposure Draft ) ) ( ( had ( been ( ( requested weeks ) ago ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Exposure) (NNP Draft)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN requested) (NP (NNS weeks)) (ADVP (IN ago))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Exposure Draft Then the following statement: "The Exposure Draft had been requested weeks ago." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
106,127
106127c
Information technology also makes it easier for businesses to deal with the risks associated with fluctuating currencies.
( ( Information technology ) ( also ( ( makes ( it ( easier ( for ( businesses ( to ( deal ( with ( ( the risks ) ( associated ( with ( fluctuating currencies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Information) (NN technology)) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VBZ makes) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (JJR easier) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS businesses) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB deal) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS risks)) (VP (VBN associated) (PP (IN with) (NP (VBG fluctuating) (NNS currencies)))))))))))))) (. .)))
Information technology is detrimental for a small business.
( ( Information technology ) ( ( is ( detrimental ( for ( a ( small business ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Information) (NN technology)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ detrimental) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ small) (NN business))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Information technology also makes it easier for businesses to deal with the risks associated with fluctuating currencies. Then the following statement: "Information technology is detrimental for a small business." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
78,631
78631e
FGD retrofits are positioned downstream, typically at the back end of the facility, and are not intrusive to the boiler.
( ( FGD retrofits ) ( ( ( ( ( are ( ( ( ( positioned downstream ) , ) typically ) ( at ( ( the ( back end ) ) ( of ( the facility ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( are not ) ( intrusive ( to ( the boiler ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP FGD) (NNS retrofits)) (VP (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN positioned) (NP (JJ downstream)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB typically)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ back) (NN end)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN facility))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ intrusive) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN boiler)))))) (. .)))
FGD retrofits are typically positioned behind a majority of the rest of the facility
( ( FGD retrofits ) ( ( are typically ) ( positioned ( behind ( ( a majority ) ( of ( ( the rest ) ( of ( the facility ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP FGD) (NNS retrofits)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB typically)) (VP (VBN positioned) (PP (IN behind) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN majority)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN rest)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN facility)))))))))))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: FGD retrofits are positioned downstream, typically at the back end of the facility, and are not intrusive to the boiler. Then the following statement: "FGD retrofits are typically positioned behind a majority of the rest of the facility" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
126,195
126195n
and uh it's just human nature to walk through an open door so and i would be glad to see that i hope i don't see a lot more single moms but i it seems in my experience i'm running across single women all the time
( and ( ( ( uh ( it ( ( 's just ) ( human ( nature ( to ( ( walk ( through ( an ( open door ) ) ) ) so ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( i ( ( ( would ( be ( glad ( to ( see ( that ( i ( hope ( i ( ( do n't ) ( see ( ( ( a lot ) more ) ( single moms ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( i ( it ( seems ( in ( ( my experience ) ( i ( 'm ( ( running ( across ( single women ) ) ) ( all ( the time ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PRN (CC and) (S (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB just)) (NP (JJ human) (NN nature) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB walk) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT an) (JJ open) (NN door))) (ADVP (RB so)))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ glad) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP hope) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB see) (NP (ADJP (NP (DT a) (RB lot)) (JJR more)) (JJ single) (NNS moms))))))))))))))) (CC but) (VP (VBD i) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ seems) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (NN experience)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (VP (VBG running) (PP (IN across) (NP (JJ single) (NNS women))) (NP (PDT all) (DT the) (NN time)))))))))))))))))
I think it is unhealthy for a child to be raised by a single mom.
( I ( ( think ( it ( ( is ( unhealthy ( for ( a child ) ) ) ) ( to ( be ( raised ( by ( a ( single mom ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ unhealthy) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (NN child)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN raised) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT a) (JJ single) (NN mom))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and uh it's just human nature to walk through an open door so and i would be glad to see that i hope i don't see a lot more single moms but i it seems in my experience i'm running across single women all the time Then the following statement: "I think it is unhealthy for a child to be raised by a single mom." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
127,139
127139n
And so there is no proof that any particular religion is sexier than any other.
( And ( so ( there ( ( ( is ( no proof ) ) ( that ( ( any ( particular religion ) ) ( is ( sexier ( than ( any other ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC And) (ADVP (RB so)) (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT no) (NN proof)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT any) (JJ particular) (NN religion)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NN sexier)) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT any) (JJ other)))))))) (. .)))
Many people believe that their religion is the only true one, and all other ones are false.
( ( ( ( ( ( Many people ) ( believe ( that ( ( their religion ) ( is ( the ( ( only true ) one ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( all ( other ones ) ) ( are false ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (JJ Many) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP believe) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP$ their) (NN religion)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RB only) (JJ true)) (NN one))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT all) (JJ other) (NNS ones)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ false)))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: And so there is no proof that any particular religion is sexier than any other. Then the following statement: "Many people believe that their religion is the only true one, and all other ones are false." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
76,548
76548c
But what does it mean?
( But ( what ( ( ( does it ) mean ) ? ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (CC But) (WHNP (WP what)) (SQ (VBZ does) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VB mean))) (. ?)))
Of course, I know all about it.
( ( Of course ) ( , ( I ( ( know ( all ( about it ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Of) (NP (NN course))) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (NP (DT all)) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP it))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But what does it mean? Then the following statement: "Of course, I know all about it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
27,932
27932n
The viceroys, including the famous Lord Mountbatten (who pondered the last details of Independence and Partition here in 1947), made it their summer capital.
( ( The viceroys ) ( , ( ( including ( ( the ( famous ( Lord Mountbatten ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( who ( ( pondered ( ( the ( last details ) ) ( of ( ( Independence and ) Partition ) ) ) ) ( here ( in 1947 ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( made it ) ( their ( summer capital ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS viceroys)) (, ,) (PP (VBG including) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ famous) (NNP Lord) (NNP Mountbatten)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD pondered) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ last) (NNS details)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Independence) (CC and) (NNP Partition)))) (PP (ADVP (RB here)) (IN in) (NP (CD 1947)))))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))) (, ,) (VP (VBD made) (NP (PRP it)) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN summer) (NN capital))) (. .)))
The capital was made for the summer months.
( ( The capital ) ( ( was ( made ( for ( the ( summer months ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN capital)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN summer) (NNS months))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The viceroys, including the famous Lord Mountbatten (who pondered the last details of Independence and Partition here in 1947), made it their summer capital. Then the following statement: "The capital was made for the summer months." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
61,841
61841e
'I said go ahead,' Lincoln repeated.
( ' ( ( I ( said ( go ahead ) ) ) ( , ( ' ( Lincoln ( repeated . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S ('' ') (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD said) (S (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB ahead)))))) (, ,) ('' ') (NP (NNP Lincoln)) (VP (VBD repeated)) (. .)))
Go forward with that he said.
( ( ( Go forward ) ( with ( that ( he said ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Go) (ADVP (RB forward)) (PP (IN with) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD said)))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 'I said go ahead,' Lincoln repeated. Then the following statement: "Go forward with that he said. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
117,012
117012c
Thus, the net avoided cost measure implies the absurdity that a government must fund the entire delivery network if it wants to fund the cost of universal service.
( Thus ( , ( ( the net ) ( ( avoided ( ( cost measure ) ( ( implies ( the absurdity ) ) ( that ( ( a government ) ( must ( ( fund ( the ( entire ( delivery network ) ) ) ) ( if ( it ( wants ( to ( fund ( ( the cost ) ( of ( universal service ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Thus)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN net)) (VP (VBD avoided) (SBAR (S (NP (NN cost) (NN measure)) (VP (VBZ implies) (NP (DT the) (NN absurdity)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT a) (NN government)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB fund) (NP (DT the) (JJ entire) (NN delivery) (NN network)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ wants) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB fund) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN cost)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ universal) (NN service)))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
The net avoided cost measure says it's the best solution for the government to fund the network.
( ( The net ) ( ( avoided ( ( cost measure ) ( says ( it ( 's ( ( the ( best solution ) ) ( for ( the ( government ( to ( fund ( the network ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN net)) (VP (VBD avoided) (SBAR (S (NP (NN cost) (NN measure)) (VP (VBZ says) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS best) (NN solution)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN government) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB fund) (NP (DT the) (NN network))))))))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Thus, the net avoided cost measure implies the absurdity that a government must fund the entire delivery network if it wants to fund the cost of universal service. Then the following statement: "The net avoided cost measure says it's the best solution for the government to fund the network." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
1,390
1390n
Two French pirate ships first ravaged the village in 1528.
( ( Two ( French ( pirate ships ) ) ) ( first ( ( ravaged ( ( the village ) ( in 1528 ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (CD Two) (JJ French) (NN pirate) (NNS ships)) (ADVP (RB first)) (VP (VBN ravaged) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN village)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1528))))) (. .)))
The pirate ships stole all valuable items from the city.
( ( The ( pirate ships ) ) ( ( ( stole ( all ( valuable items ) ) ) ( from ( the city ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ pirate) (NNS ships)) (VP (VBD stole) (NP (DT all) (JJ valuable) (NNS items)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN city)))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Two French pirate ships first ravaged the village in 1528. Then the following statement: "The pirate ships stole all valuable items from the city." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
83,289
83289c
Below, dark refers to the day when the show does not play at all.
( Below ( , ( dark ( ( ( refers ( to ( the day ) ) ) ( when ( ( the show ) ( ( does not ) ( play ( at all ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Below)) (, ,) (NP (NN dark)) (VP (VBZ refers) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN day))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (DT the) (NN show)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB not) (VP (VB play) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all))))))) (. .)))
When it is dark, one can expect to see a show playing.
( ( When ( it ( is dark ) ) ) ( , ( one ( ( can ( expect ( to ( see ( a ( show playing ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ dark))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP one)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB expect) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (NP (DT a) (NN show) (NN playing))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Below, dark refers to the day when the show does not play at all. Then the following statement: "When it is dark, one can expect to see a show playing." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
11,510
11510n
When that happens, Democrats will be bound to escalate the confirmation battle once more, to settle their score with Hatch.
( ( When ( that happens ) ) ( , ( Democrats ( ( will ( be ( ( ( bound ( to ( ( escalate ( the ( confirmation battle ) ) ) ( once more ) ) ) ) , ) ( to ( ( settle ( their score ) ) ( with Hatch ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ happens)))) (, ,) (NP (NNPS Democrats)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN bound) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB escalate) (NP (DT the) (NN confirmation) (NN battle)) (ADVP (RB once) (RBR more))))) (, ,) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB settle) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN score)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNP Hatch))))))))) (. .)))
When it happens, the Democrats will make the confirmation battle their first priority so that they can get even with Hatch.
( ( When ( it happens ) ) ( , ( ( the Democrats ) ( ( will ( make ( ( the confirmation ) ( ( battle ( their ( first priority ) ) ) ( so ( that ( they ( can ( ( get even ) ( with Hatch ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ happens)))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNPS Democrats)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB make) (S (NP (DT the) (NN confirmation)) (VP (VB battle) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ first) (NN priority)) (SBAR (RB so) (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB get) (ADVP (RB even)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNP Hatch))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: When that happens, Democrats will be bound to escalate the confirmation battle once more, to settle their score with Hatch. Then the following statement: "When it happens, the Democrats will make the confirmation battle their first priority so that they can get even with Hatch. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
102,458
102458e
These people are the real wild-horse experts, Kirby.
( ( These people ) ( ( are ( ( ( the ( real ( wild-horse experts ) ) ) , ) Kirby ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT These) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ real) (JJ wild-horse) (NNS experts)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Kirby)))) (. .)))
Kirby, these people are experts in wild horses.
( Kirby ( , ( ( these people ) ( ( are ( experts ( in ( wild horses ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Kirby)) (, ,) (NP (DT these) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NNS experts)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ wild) (NNS horses))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: These people are the real wild-horse experts, Kirby. Then the following statement: "Kirby, these people are experts in wild horses." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
51,881
51881e
The tip of her skull-hilted broadsword burst from the chest of a huge Stick holding a warmaul.
( ( ( The tip ) ( of ( her ( skull-hilted broadsword ) ) ) ) ( ( burst ( from ( ( ( the chest ) ( of ( a ( huge Stick ) ) ) ) ( holding ( a warmaul ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN tip)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ skull-hilted) (NN broadsword)))) (VP (VBP burst) (PP (IN from) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN chest)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (JJ huge) (NNP Stick)))) (VP (VBG holding) (NP (DT a) (NN warmaul)))))) (. .)))
The sword went through someone.
( ( The sword ) ( ( went ( through someone ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN sword)) (VP (VBD went) (PP (IN through) (NP (NN someone)))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The tip of her skull-hilted broadsword burst from the chest of a huge Stick holding a warmaul. Then the following statement: "The sword went through someone." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
15,703
15703e
We can begin tomorrow, he said and then returned to Susan.
( ( We ( can ( begin tomorrow ) ) ) ( , ( he ( ( ( said and ) ( then ( returned ( to Susan ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB begin) (NP (NN tomorrow))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VP (VBD said)) (CC and) (VP (ADVP (RB then)) (VBD returned) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Susan))))) (. .)))
A man spoke to someone before rejoining a woman.
( ( A man ) ( ( ( spoke ( to someone ) ) ( before ( rejoining ( a woman ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NN man)) (VP (VBD spoke) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN someone))) (PP (IN before) (S (VP (VBG rejoining) (NP (DT a) (NN woman)))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: We can begin tomorrow, he said and then returned to Susan. Then the following statement: "A man spoke to someone before rejoining a woman. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
117,648
117648n
Off El Hurriya Street you'll find the Neo-Classical facade of the Greco-Roman Museum with a fine collection of both Roman, Greek, and Ptolemaic artifacts found around the city and under the waters of the harbor, along with many ancient Egyptian pieces.
( ( Off ( ( El ( Hurriya Street ) ) ( you ( 'll ( ( find ( ( the ( Neo-Classical facade ) ) ( of ( the ( Greco-Roman Museum ) ) ) ) ) ( with ( ( a ( fine collection ) ) ( of ( both Roman ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( Greek ( , ( and ( Ptolemaic artifacts ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( found ( ( ( around ( the city ) ) and ) ( under ( ( the waters ) ( of ( the harbor ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( along ( with ( many ( ancient ( Egyptian pieces ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Off) (NP (NP (NNP El) (NNP Hurriya) (NNP Street)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB find) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Neo-Classical) (NN facade)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Greco-Roman) (NNP Museum)))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ fine) (NN collection)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT both) (NNP Roman))))))))))) (, ,) (NP (JJ Greek) (, ,) (CC and) (JJ Ptolemaic) (NNS artifacts)) (VP (VBD found) (PP (PP (IN around) (NP (DT the) (NN city))) (CC and) (PP (IN under) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS waters)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN harbor)))))) (, ,) (ADVP (IN along) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ many) (JJ ancient) (JJ Egyptian) (NNS pieces))))) (. .)))
The Museum also contains ancient barbarian artifacts.
( ( The Museum ) ( also ( ( contains ( ancient ( barbarian artifacts ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Museum)) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VBZ contains) (NP (JJ ancient) (NN barbarian) (NNS artifacts))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Off El Hurriya Street you'll find the Neo-Classical facade of the Greco-Roman Museum with a fine collection of both Roman, Greek, and Ptolemaic artifacts found around the city and under the waters of the harbor, along with many ancient Egyptian pieces. Then the following statement: "The Museum also contains ancient barbarian artifacts." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
97,664
97664e
But, as in Washington, on snowy days like this, you take what you can get.
( But ( , ( ( as ( in Washington ) ) ( , ( ( on ( ( snowy days ) ( like this ) ) ) ( , ( you ( ( take ( what ( you ( can get ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (, ,) (PP (RB as) (IN in) (NP (NNP Washington))) (, ,) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (JJ snowy) (NNS days)) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT this))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP take) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB get)))))) (. .)))
It sometimes snows in the Washington area.
( It ( sometimes ( ( snows ( in ( the ( Washington area ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (ADVP (RB sometimes)) (VP (VBZ snows) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Washington) (NN area)))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But, as in Washington, on snowy days like this, you take what you can get. Then the following statement: "It sometimes snows in the Washington area." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
122,855
122855c
So let's recognize this current enthusiasm for currency unification as what it an intellectual fad, not a deep insight.
( So ( ( ( let ( 's ( recognize ( ( ( this ( current enthusiasm ) ) ( for ( ( currency unification ) ( as what ) ) ) ) it ) ) ) ) ( ( ( an ( intellectual fad ) ) , ) ( not ( a ( deep insight ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (SINV (RB So) (VP (VBD let) (S (NP (POS 's)) (VP (VB recognize) (S (NP (NP (DT this) (JJ current) (NN enthusiasm)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NN currency) (NN unification)) (PP (IN as) (NP (WP what)))))) (NP (PRP it)))))) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ intellectual) (NN fad)) (, ,) (NP (RB not) (DT a) (JJ deep) (NN insight))) (. .)))
Currency unification is the key to global economic success.
( ( Currency unification ) ( ( is ( ( the key ) ( to ( global ( economic success ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Currency) (NN unification)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN key)) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ global) (JJ economic) (NN success))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: So let's recognize this current enthusiasm for currency unification as what it an intellectual fad, not a deep insight. Then the following statement: "Currency unification is the key to global economic success." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
86,002
86002e
Why do you know so positively?
( Why ( ( ( do you ) ( ( know so ) positively ) ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB Why)) (SQ (VBP do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB know) (ADVP (RB so)) (ADVP (RB positively)))) (. ?)))
Why do you know?
( Why ( ( ( do you ) know ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB Why)) (SQ (VBP do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB know))) (. ?)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Why do you know so positively? Then the following statement: "Why do you know?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
144,565
144565e
At the Equal Justice Conference (EJC) held in March 2001 in San Diego, LSC and the Project for the Future of Equal Justice held the second Case Management Software pre-conference.
( ( At ( ( ( the ( Equal ( Justice Conference ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( EJC -RRB- ) ) ) ( held ( in ( ( March 2001 ) ( in ( San Diego ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( LSC and ) ( ( the Project ) ( for ( ( the Future ) ( of ( Equal Justice ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( held ( the ( second ( Case ( Management ( Software pre-conference ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN At) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Equal) (NNP Justice) (NNP Conference)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP EJC)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (VP (VBN held) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP March) (CD 2001)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP San) (NNP Diego)))))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP LSC)) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN Project)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Future)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Equal) (NNP Justice))))))) (VP (VBD held) (NP (DT the) (JJ second) (NNP Case) (NNP Management) (NNP Software) (NN pre-conference))) (. .)))
The EJC was held in March 2001.
( ( The EJC ) ( ( was ( held ( in ( March 2001 ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP EJC)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN held) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP March) (CD 2001))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: At the Equal Justice Conference (EJC) held in March 2001 in San Diego, LSC and the Project for the Future of Equal Justice held the second Case Management Software pre-conference. Then the following statement: "The EJC was held in March 2001." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True