promptID
int32 0
146k
| pairID
stringlengths 2
7
| premise
stringlengths 5
1.82k
| premise_binary_parse
stringlengths 6
3.43k
| premise_parse
stringlengths 23
6.45k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 1
393
| hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths 1
669
| hypothesis_parse
stringlengths 19
1.15k
| genre
stringclasses 5
values | label
class label 3
classes | template_name
stringclasses 11
values | template
stringclasses 11
values | rendered_input
stringlengths 46
2.02k
| rendered_output
stringclasses 14
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86,406 |
86406n
|
you mandrake-man!" He grunted.
|
( ( ( ( ( you mandrake-man ) ! ) '' ) ( He grunted ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBZ mandrake-man))) (. !) ('' '') (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD grunted))) (. .)))
|
"You evil mandrake-man!" He shouted.
|
( `` ( ( You ( evil mandrake-man ) ) ( ! ( '' ( He ( shouted . ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (`` ``) (SQ (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VB evil) (NP (NN mandrake-man)))) (. !) ('' '') (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD shouted)) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: you mandrake-man!" He grunted.
Then the following statement: ""You evil mandrake-man!" He shouted." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
39,988 |
39988n
|
and so what we had to do is we had to get on the trail or on the road
|
( and ( so ( what ( we ( had ( to ( do ( is ( we ( had ( to ( get ( ( ( on ( the trail ) ) or ) ( on ( the road ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (ADVP (ADVP (RB so)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (PP (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN trail))) (CC or) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN road))))))))))))))))))))))
|
We had to get on the trail or road in order to be able to ride a bike.
|
( We ( ( ( had ( to ( get ( on ( ( the ( ( trail or ) road ) ) ( in order ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( be ( able ( to ( ride ( a bike ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN trail) (CC or) (NN road)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN order)))))))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB ride) (NP (DT a) (NN bike)))))))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: and so what we had to do is we had to get on the trail or on the road
Then the following statement: "We had to get on the trail or road in order to be able to ride a bike." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
5,606 |
5606c
|
Helen Gurley Brown, about the many plus sides to sexual harassment.
|
( ( ( ( Helen ( Gurley Brown ) ) , ) ( ( ( about ( the many ) ) ( plus sides ) ) ( to ( sexual harassment ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (NP (NP (NNP Helen) (NNP Gurley) (NNP Brown)) (, ,) (NP (NP (QP (RB about) (DT the) (JJ many)) (JJ plus) (NNS sides)) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ sexual) (NN harassment)))) (. .)))
|
Helen Gurley Brown believeves that Sexual Harassment is great.
|
( ( Helen ( Gurley Brown ) ) ( ( believeves ( that ( ( Sexual Harassment ) ( is great ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Helen) (NNP Gurley) (NNP Brown)) (VP (VBZ believeves) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Sexual) (NNP Harassment)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ great)))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Helen Gurley Brown, about the many plus sides to sexual harassment.
Then the following statement: "Helen Gurley Brown believeves that Sexual Harassment is great. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
70,285 |
70285n
|
While the empirical basis for adjusting the $6 million VSL for many of these factors does not yet exist, a thorough discussion of these uncertainties is included in EPA's Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses (U.S.
|
( ( While ( ( ( the ( empirical basis ) ) ( for ( adjusting ( ( the ( ( ( $ 6 ) million ) VSL ) ) ( for ( many ( of ( these factors ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( does not ) yet ) exist ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( a ( thorough discussion ) ) ( of ( these uncertainties ) ) ) ( is ( ( included ( in ( ( EPA 's ) Guidelines ) ) ) ( for ( ( Preparing Economic ) ( Analyses ( -LRB- U.S. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN While) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ empirical) (NN basis)) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG adjusting) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (QP ($ $) (CD 6) (CD million))) (NN VSL)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ many)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT these) (NNS factors)))))))))) (VP (VBZ does) (RB not) (ADVP (RB yet)) (VP (VB exist))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ thorough) (NN discussion)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT these) (NNS uncertainties)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN included) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP EPA) (POS 's)) (NNS Guidelines))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNP Preparing) (NNP Economic)) (NP (NNP Analyses) (-LRB- -LRB-) (NNP U.S.))))))))
|
The VSL is worth the amount of $6 million.
|
( ( The VSL ) ( ( is ( worth ( ( the amount ) ( of ( ( $ 6 ) million ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP VSL)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (IN worth) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN amount)) (PP (IN of) (NP (QP ($ $) (CD 6) (CD million))))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: While the empirical basis for adjusting the $6 million VSL for many of these factors does not yet exist, a thorough discussion of these uncertainties is included in EPA's Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses (U.S.
Then the following statement: "The VSL is worth the amount of $6 million." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
5,994 |
5994e
|
In these early uses of the case study method, evaluators wrote their reports to stand alone.
|
( ( In ( ( these ( early uses ) ) ( of ( the ( case ( study method ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( evaluators ( ( ( wrote ( their reports ) ) ( to ( stand alone ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT these) (JJ early) (NNS uses)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN case) (NN study) (NN method))))) (, ,) (NP (NNS evaluators)) (VP (VBD wrote) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS reports)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB stand) (ADVP (RB alone)))))) (. .)))
|
Stand alone reports were standard for case studies.
|
( ( Stand ( alone reports ) ) ( ( were ( standard ( for ( case studies ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Stand) (JJ alone) (NNS reports)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (NP (NN standard)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN case) (NNS studies))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: In these early uses of the case study method, evaluators wrote their reports to stand alone.
Then the following statement: "Stand alone reports were standard for case studies. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
49,075 |
49075n
|
What I really want to know is what you meant by what you said to me the other day?
|
( What ( ( I ( really ( want ( to ( know ( is ( what ( you ( meant ( by ( what ( you ( ( said ( to me ) ) ( the ( other day ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? ) )
|
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WP What)) (SQ (NP (PRP I)) (VP (ADVP (RB really)) (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD meant) (PP (IN by) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD said) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP me))) (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NN day))))))))))))))))) (. ?)))
|
Tell me what you meant the other day.
|
( ( ( Tell me ) ( what ( you ( meant ( the ( other day ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Tell) (NP (PRP me)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD meant) (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NN day)))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: What I really want to know is what you meant by what you said to me the other day?
Then the following statement: "Tell me what you meant the other day." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
62,082 |
62082n
|
She was not extravagantly loved, no.
|
( ( ( ( She ( ( was not ) ( extravagantly loved ) ) ) , ) no ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD was) (RB not) (VP (ADVP (RB extravagantly)) (VBN loved)))) (, ,) (FRAG (INTJ (UH no))) (. .)))
|
She wasn't loved by anyone because she was such a jerk.
|
( She ( ( ( was n't ) ( ( loved ( by anyone ) ) ( because ( she ( was ( such ( a jerk ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (VP (VBN loved) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN anyone))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (PDT such) (DT a) (NN jerk))))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: She was not extravagantly loved, no.
Then the following statement: "She wasn't loved by anyone because she was such a jerk." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
119,197 |
119197e
|
After two weeks, Peter of Tschekan realized that the cell phone was more valuable to him than a painting by de Bonnet-Majak - the number one artist on his list.
|
( ( After ( two weeks ) ) ( , ( ( Peter ( of Tschekan ) ) ( ( realized ( that ( ( the ( cell phone ) ) ( ( was ( more ( valuable ( to ( him ( than ( a painting ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( by ( ( ( de Bonnet-Majak ) - ) ( ( the ( number ( one artist ) ) ) ( on ( his list ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN After) (NP (CD two) (NNS weeks))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Peter)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Tschekan)))) (VP (VBD realized) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN cell) (NN phone)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ valuable) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (NP (PRP him)) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT a) (NN painting))))))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP de) (NNP Bonnet-Majak)) (: -) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN number) (CD one) (NN artist)) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN list)))))))))) (. .)))
|
Peter realized his phone was very important to him.
|
( Peter ( ( realized ( ( his phone ) ( was ( very ( important ( to him ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Peter)) (VP (VBD realized) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP$ his) (NN phone)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ important) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP him)))))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: After two weeks, Peter of Tschekan realized that the cell phone was more valuable to him than a painting by de Bonnet-Majak - the number one artist on his list.
Then the following statement: "Peter realized his phone was very important to him." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
129,955 |
129955n
|
It's hard to find them these days.
|
( It ( ( 's ( hard ( to ( ( find them ) ( these days ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ hard) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB find) (NP (PRP them)) (NP (DT these) (NNS days))))))) (. .)))
|
They used to be commonly available.
|
( They ( ( used ( to ( be ( commonly available ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (RB commonly) (JJ available)))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: It's hard to find them these days.
Then the following statement: "They used to be commonly available." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
119,892 |
119892n
|
If Texaco executives had indulged their personal tastes for Van Gogh oil paintings at a multimillion-dollar cost to the stockholders, it would be self-evident that the stockholders had been plundered.
|
( ( If ( ( Texaco executives ) ( had ( ( ( indulged ( ( their ( personal tastes ) ) ( for ( Van ( Gogh ( oil paintings ) ) ) ) ) ) ( at ( a ( multimillion-dollar cost ) ) ) ) ( to ( the stockholders ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( would ( ( be self-evident ) ( that ( ( the stockholders ) ( had ( been plundered ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (NNP Texaco) (NNS executives)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN indulged) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ personal) (NNS tastes)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Van) (NNP Gogh) (NN oil) (NNS paintings)))) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT a) (JJ multimillion-dollar) (NN cost))) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNS stockholders))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ self-evident)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS stockholders)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN plundered)))))))) (. .)))
|
Texaco executives have been known in the past to support their personal tastes using stockholders' money.
|
( ( Texaco executives ) ( ( have ( been ( ( known ( in ( the past ) ) ) ( to ( ( support ( their ( personal tastes ) ) ) ( using ( ( stockholders ' ) money ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Texaco) (NNS executives)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN known) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN past))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB support) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ personal) (NNS tastes)) (S (VP (VBG using) (NP (NP (NNS stockholders) (POS ')) (NN money)))))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: If Texaco executives had indulged their personal tastes for Van Gogh oil paintings at a multimillion-dollar cost to the stockholders, it would be self-evident that the stockholders had been plundered.
Then the following statement: "Texaco executives have been known in the past to support their personal tastes using stockholders' money." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
67,550 |
67550n
|
oh okay real pretty like a swamp oh yeah yeah oh okay yeah i been uh i got uh talked to someone else before that was a uh a Texan but i guess that's uh that's what we're going to have this is uh a TI experiment to see how talk Texans talk to other people
|
( ( ( ( oh ( okay ( real ( ( pretty ( like ( a ( swamp oh ) ) ) ) ( yeah yeah ) ) ) ) ) ( ( oh okay ) ( yeah ( ( i ( been ( uh i ) ) ) ( got uh ) ) ) ) ) ( ( talked ( to ( someone else ) ) ) ( before ( that ( was ( a uh ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( a ( ( ( Texan but ) i ) guess ) ) ( that ( 's ( uh ( that ( 's ( what ( we ( 're ( going ( to ( have ( this ( is ( ( uh ( a ( TI experiment ) ) ) ( to ( see ( how ( ( talk Texans ) ( talk ( to ( other people ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SINV (VP (VBG oh) (NP (ADJP (JJ okay)) (JJ real) (ADJP (RB pretty) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (JJ swamp) (NN oh)))) (NN yeah) (NN yeah)) (S (INTJ (UH oh) (UH okay)) (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBN been) (NP (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (FW i))))) (VP (VBD got) (INTJ (UH uh)))))))) (VP (VBD talked) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN someone) (RB else))) (SBAR (IN before) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (NN uh)))))) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (JJ Texan) (CC but) (JJ i)) (NN guess)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (NNP uh)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (S (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG uh) (NP (DT a) (NNP TI) (NN experiment)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (NNP talk) (NNPS Texans)) (VP (VBP talk) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ other) (NNS people)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
|
Texans sound different to non-Texans.
|
( Texans ( ( sound ( different ( to non-Texans ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNPS Texans)) (VP (VB sound) (ADJP (JJ different) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNS non-Texans))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: oh okay real pretty like a swamp oh yeah yeah oh okay yeah i been uh i got uh talked to someone else before that was a uh a Texan but i guess that's uh that's what we're going to have this is uh a TI experiment to see how talk Texans talk to other people
Then the following statement: "Texans sound different to non-Texans." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
39,042 |
39042c
|
Allow me to interest myself in my coffee-cups, and I will respect your coco.
|
( ( ( ( ( Allow ( me ( to ( ( interest myself ) ( in ( my coffee-cups ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( I ( will ( respect ( your coco ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VB Allow) (S (NP (PRP me)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB interest) (NP (PRP myself)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ my) (NNS coffee-cups)))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB respect) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN coco))))) (. .)))
|
There was coco in all of the cups.
|
( There ( ( was ( coco ( in ( all ( of ( the cups ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (NN coco)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT all)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS cups))))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Allow me to interest myself in my coffee-cups, and I will respect your coco.
Then the following statement: "There was coco in all of the cups." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
121,367 |
121367e
|
The government, through the powerful Finance Ministry and Ministry of International Trade and Industry, generously supported favored private first shipping, then cars, then electronics firms basked in the warmth of the government's loving attentions.
|
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( The government ) , ) ( through ( ( ( the ( powerful ( Finance Ministry ) ) ) and ) ( Ministry ( of ( International ( ( Trade and ) Industry ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( generously ( supported ( ( ( ( favored ( private ( first shipping ) ) ) , ) then ) cars ) ) ) ) , ) then ) ( ( electronics firms ) ( basked ( in ( ( the warmth ) ( of ( ( the ( government 's ) ) ( loving attentions ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN government)) (, ,) (NP (IN through) (NP (DT the) (JJ powerful) (NNP Finance) (NNP Ministry)) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNP Ministry)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP International) (NNP Trade) (CC and) (NNP Industry))))) (, ,)) (ADVP (RB generously)) (VP (VBD supported) (NP (NP (JJ favored) (JJ private) (JJ first) (NN shipping)) (, ,) (RB then) (NP (NNS cars))))) (, ,) (RB then) (S (NP (NN electronics) (NNS firms)) (VP (VBD basked) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN warmth)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN government) (POS 's)) (VBG loving) (NNS attentions))))))) (. .)))
|
The government supported private first shipping, cars, and electronics firms.
|
( ( The government ) ( ( supported ( ( ( ( ( ( private ( first shipping ) ) , ) cars ) , ) and ) ( electronics firms ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN government)) (VP (VBD supported) (NP (NP (JJ private) (JJ first) (NN shipping)) (, ,) (NP (NNS cars)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NN electronics) (NNS firms)))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The government, through the powerful Finance Ministry and Ministry of International Trade and Industry, generously supported favored private first shipping, then cars, then electronics firms basked in the warmth of the government's loving attentions.
Then the following statement: "The government supported private first shipping, cars, and electronics firms." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
120,695 |
120695e
|
To correct for the potential extrapolation error for ages beyond 70, the adjustment factor is selected as the ratio of a 70 year old individual's WTP to a 40 year old individual's WTP, which is 0.63, based on the Jones-Lee (1989) results and 0.92 based on the Jones-Lee (1993) results.
|
( ( To ( ( correct ( for ( ( the ( potential ( extrapolation error ) ) ) ( for ages ) ) ) ) ( beyond 70 ) ) ) ( , ( ( the ( adjustment factor ) ) ( ( is ( ( ( ( ( selected ( as ( ( the ratio ) ( of ( ( ( ( ( a ( ( ( 70 year ) ( ( old individual ) 's ) ) WTP ) ) to ) ( a ( ( ( 40 year ) ( ( old individual ) 's ) ) WTP ) ) ) , ) ( which ( is 0.63 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( based ( on ( the ( Jones-Lee ( ( -LRB- ( 1989 -RRB- ) ) results ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( 0.92 ( based ( on ( the ( Jones-Lee ( ( -LRB- ( 1993 -RRB- ) ) results ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (TO To) (VP (VB correct) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ potential) (NN extrapolation) (NN error)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS ages))))) (PP (IN beyond) (NP (CD 70)))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN adjustment) (NN factor)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VP (VBN selected) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN ratio)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NP (NP (CD 70) (NN year)) (ADJP (JJ old) (JJ individual)) (POS 's)) (NNP WTP)) (TO to) (NP (DT a) (NP (NP (CD 40) (NN year)) (ADJP (JJ old) (JJ individual)) (POS 's)) (NNP WTP))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ 0.63)))))))))) (, ,) (VP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (JJ Jones-Lee) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (CD 1989)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (NNS results)))) (CC and) (VP (VBN 0.92) (PP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (JJ Jones-Lee) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (CD 1993)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (NNS results))))))) (. .)))
|
There might be error for old people.
|
( There ( ( might ( be ( error ( for ( old people ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (MD might) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (NN error)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ old) (NNS people)))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: To correct for the potential extrapolation error for ages beyond 70, the adjustment factor is selected as the ratio of a 70 year old individual's WTP to a 40 year old individual's WTP, which is 0.63, based on the Jones-Lee (1989) results and 0.92 based on the Jones-Lee (1993) results.
Then the following statement: "There might be error for old people." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
26,341 |
26341n
|
Several alternative design solutions can be considered during this phase, leading up to the selection of a single preferred approach.
|
( ( Several ( alternative ( design solutions ) ) ) ( ( can ( be ( ( ( considered ( during ( this phase ) ) ) , ) ( ( leading up ) ( to ( ( the selection ) ( of ( a ( single ( preferred approach ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Several) (JJ alternative) (NN design) (NNS solutions)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN considered) (PP (IN during) (NP (DT this) (NN phase))) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG leading) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN selection)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (JJ single) (JJ preferred) (NN approach)))))))))) (. .)))
|
It is like a competition where several choices are offered and then assessed to see which is best.
|
( It ( ( is ( like ( ( a competition ) ( where ( ( several choices ) ( are ( ( ( offered and ) then ) ( assessed ( to ( see ( which ( is best ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN competition)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (JJ several) (NNS choices)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VP (VBN offered)) (CC and) (ADVP (RB then)) (VP (VBN assessed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJS best)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Several alternative design solutions can be considered during this phase, leading up to the selection of a single preferred approach.
Then the following statement: "It is like a competition where several choices are offered and then assessed to see which is best." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
45,239 |
45239c
|
Guess having the lights down low in the Oval Office all those times really paid off ...
|
( ( Guess ( having ( ( the lights ) ( down ( low ( in ( ( the ( Oval Office ) ) ( ( all ( those times ) ) ( really ( paid off ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ... )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Guess) (S (VP (VBG having) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS lights)) (ADJP (RB down) (JJ low) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Oval) (NNP Office)) (SBAR (S (NP (PDT all) (DT those) (NNS times)) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBD paid) (PRT (RP off)))))))))))) (: ...)))
|
The Oval Office is required to be fully lit at all times.
|
( ( The ( Oval Office ) ) ( ( is ( required ( to ( be ( fully ( lit ( at ( all times ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Oval) (NNP Office)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN required) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (RB fully) (JJ lit) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT all) (NNS times))))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Guess having the lights down low in the Oval Office all those times really paid off ...
Then the following statement: "The Oval Office is required to be fully lit at all times." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
141,558 |
141558e
|
Before the conference, he and Daniel Pollock drafted recommendations for the steering committee to consider.
|
( ( Before ( the conference ) ) ( , ( ( ( he and ) ( Daniel Pollock ) ) ( ( ( ( drafted recommendations ) ( for ( the ( steering committee ) ) ) ) ( to consider ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Before) (NP (DT the) (NN conference))) (, ,) (NP (NP (PRP he)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Daniel) (NNP Pollock))) (VP (VBD drafted) (NP (NNS recommendations)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN steering) (NN committee))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB consider))))) (. .)))
|
Pollock helped draft recommendations for the committee.
|
( Pollock ( ( ( helped ( draft recommendations ) ) ( for ( the committee ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Pollock)) (VP (VBD helped) (NP (NN draft) (NNS recommendations)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN committee)))) (. .)))
|
government
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Before the conference, he and Daniel Pollock drafted recommendations for the steering committee to consider.
Then the following statement: "Pollock helped draft recommendations for the committee." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
29,146 |
29146n
|
Look out for Robert le Lorrain's fine Les Chevaux d'Apollon over the old stables in the second courtyard, admired as one of France's most beautiful 18th-century sculptures.
|
( ( ( ( Look out ) ( for ( ( Robert ( le ( Lorrain 's ) ) ) ( fine ( Les ( Chevaux d'Apollon ) ) ) ) ) ) ( over ( ( the ( old stables ) ) ( in ( the ( second courtyard ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( admired ( as ( one ( of ( ( France 's ) ( ( most beautiful ) ( 18th-century sculptures ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VB Look) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNP Robert) (NNP le) (NNP Lorrain) (POS 's)) (NN fine) (NNP Les) (NNP Chevaux) (NN d'Apollon))) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ old) (NNS stables)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ second) (NN courtyard))))))) (, ,) (VP (VBD admired) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP France) (POS 's)) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ beautiful)) (JJ 18th-century) (NNS sculptures)))))) (. .)))
|
The 18th century sculpture was built around the same time as the old stables.
|
( ( The ( 18th ( century sculpture ) ) ) ( ( was ( built ( around ( ( the ( same time ) ) ( as ( the ( old stables ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ 18th) (NN century) (NN sculpture)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN around) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN time)) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT the) (JJ old) (NNS stables))))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Look out for Robert le Lorrain's fine Les Chevaux d'Apollon over the old stables in the second courtyard, admired as one of France's most beautiful 18th-century sculptures.
Then the following statement: "The 18th century sculpture was built around the same time as the old stables." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
79,735 |
79735e
|
Remember what dear old Conrad said WITH YOUR OWN PASSWORD, wasn't it?
|
( ( Remember ( what dear ) ) ( ( ( ( old Conrad ) ( said ( WITH ( YOUR ( OWN PASSWORD ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( was n't ) it ) ? ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VB Remember) (S (NP (WDT what)) (ADJP (RB dear))))) (PRN (S (NP (JJ old) (NNS Conrad)) (VP (VBD said) (PP (IN WITH) (NP (JJ YOUR) (NNP OWN) (NNP PASSWORD))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (NP (PRP it))) (. ?)))
|
What dear old Conrad said WITH YOUR OWN PASSWORD, remember?
|
( ( ( ( What dear ) old ) Conrad ) ( ( ( ( said ( WITH ( YOUR ( OWN PASSWORD ) ) ) ) , ) remember ) ? ) )
|
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WDT What) (JJ dear) (JJ old) (NN Conrad)) (SQ (VP (VBD said) (PP (IN WITH) (NP (JJ YOUR) (NNP OWN) (NNP PASSWORD))) (, ,) (VP (VB remember)))) (. ?)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Remember what dear old Conrad said WITH YOUR OWN PASSWORD, wasn't it?
Then the following statement: "What dear old Conrad said WITH YOUR OWN PASSWORD, remember?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
110,751 |
110751e
|
well the injector nozzle and stuff in you know the big diesel farm tractors you know what are about the size of your thumb and the yeah you can get to them and the ones in in the diesel cars were little tiny things and just almost impossible to do anything with
|
( ( ( well ( the ( injector ( ( nozzle and ) stuff ) ) ) ) ( in you ) ) ( ( know ( ( the ( big ( diesel ( farm tractors ) ) ) ) ( you ( know ( ( ( what ( are ( about ( ( the size ) ( of ( your thumb ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( the ( ( ( ( yeah ( ( ( you ( can ( get ( to them ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( the ones ) ( in ( in ( the ( diesel cars ) ) ) ) ) ( were ( little ( tiny things ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( just almost ) ( impossible ( to do ) ) ) ) anything ) ) ) ) ) ) ) with ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (RB well) (DT the) (JJ injector) (NN nozzle) (CC and) (NN stuff)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP you)))) (VP (VBP know) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ big) (JJ diesel) (NN farm) (NNS tractors)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBP are) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN size)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN thumb)))))))) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (ADJP (ADJP (JJ yeah) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB get) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP them)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS ones)) (PP (IN in) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ diesel) (NNS cars))))) (VP (VBD were) (NP (JJ little) (JJ tiny) (NNS things))))))) (CC and) (ADJP (ADVP (RB just) (RB almost)) (JJ impossible) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do)))))) (NN anything))))))) (PP (IN with)))))
|
The injector nozzles in diesel cars are much smaller than the nozzles in farm tractors.
|
( ( ( The ( injector nozzles ) ) ( in ( diesel cars ) ) ) ( ( are ( ( much smaller ) ( than ( ( the nozzles ) ( in ( farm tractors ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN injector) (NNS nozzles)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ diesel) (NNS cars)))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (ADJP (RB much) (JJR smaller)) (PP (IN than) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS nozzles)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN farm) (NNS tractors))))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: well the injector nozzle and stuff in you know the big diesel farm tractors you know what are about the size of your thumb and the yeah you can get to them and the ones in in the diesel cars were little tiny things and just almost impossible to do anything with
Then the following statement: "The injector nozzles in diesel cars are much smaller than the nozzles in farm tractors." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
92,234 |
92234n
|
well yeah yeah and you can you can get to them well i
|
( well ( yeah ( ( yeah ( and ( you can ) ) ) ( you ( can ( ( get ( to them ) ) ( well i ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB well)) (VP (VB yeah) (VP (VB yeah) (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can)))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB get) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP them))) (PP (RB well) (NP (FW i)))))))))))
|
You can get to them easily, just go to the store and buy them
|
( You ( can ( ( ( ( ( ( get ( to them ) ) easily ) , ) ( just ( go ( to ( the store ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( buy them ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VP (VB get) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP them))) (ADVP (RB easily))) (, ,) (VP (ADVP (RB just)) (VB go) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN store)))) (CC and) (VP (VB buy) (NP (PRP them)))))))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: well yeah yeah and you can you can get to them well i
Then the following statement: "You can get to them easily, just go to the store and buy them" is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
66,357 |
66357n
|
i wonder if we talked before
|
( i ( wonder ( if ( we ( talked before ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP wonder) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD talked) (ADVP (RB before))))))))
|
I wonder if we spoke on the phone previously.
|
( I ( ( wonder ( if ( we ( ( spoke ( on ( the phone ) ) ) previously ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP wonder) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD spoke) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN phone))) (ADVP (RB previously)))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: i wonder if we talked before
Then the following statement: "I wonder if we spoke on the phone previously." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
24,068 |
24068e
|
yeah nice talking with you are you calling from Texas by the way
|
( yeah ( nice ( talking ( with ( you ( are ( you ( ( calling ( from Texas ) ) ( by ( the way ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (ADJP (JJ nice) (S (VP (VBG talking) (SBAR (IN with) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBG calling) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP Texas))) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NN way))))))))))))))
|
It was great to speak with you. By the way, are you from Texas?
|
( ( It ( ( was ( great ( to ( speak ( ( with you ) . ) ) ) ) ) ( By ( the way ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( are you ) ( from Texas ) ) ? ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SQ (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ great) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB speak) (FRAG (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP you))) (. .)))))) (PP (IN By) (NP (DT the) (NN way))))) (, ,) (SQ (VBP are) (NP (PRP you)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP Texas)))) (. ?)))
|
telephone
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: yeah nice talking with you are you calling from Texas by the way
Then the following statement: "It was great to speak with you. By the way, are you from Texas?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
11,747 |
11747n
|
But first there would have to be seizure of control by some group that was not indifferent.
|
( But ( first ( there ( ( would ( have ( to ( ( be ( seizure ( of control ) ) ) ( by ( ( some group ) ( that ( ( was not ) indifferent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (CC But) (ADVP (RB first)) (NP (EX there)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (NN seizure)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN control)))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT some) (NN group)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD was) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ indifferent)))))))))))) (. .)))
|
The group would be easy to find.
|
( ( The group ) ( ( would ( be ( easy ( to find ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN group)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ easy) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB find))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: But first there would have to be seizure of control by some group that was not indifferent.
Then the following statement: "The group would be easy to find." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
79,208 |
79208n
|
Therefore, the transfer is not an exchange transaction.
|
( Therefore ( , ( ( the transfer ) ( ( ( is not ) ( an ( exchange transaction ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Therefore)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN transfer)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (NP (DT an) (NN exchange) (NN transaction))) (. .)))
|
Rather than being a complex exchange transaction, it is a simple transfer of funds.
|
( ( Rather ( than ( being ( a ( complex ( exchange transaction ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( is ( ( a ( simple transfer ) ) ( of funds ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (RB Rather) (IN than) (S (VP (VBG being) (NP (DT a) (JJ complex) (NN exchange) (NN transaction))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ simple) (NN transfer)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS funds))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Therefore, the transfer is not an exchange transaction.
Then the following statement: "Rather than being a complex exchange transaction, it is a simple transfer of funds. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
143,673 |
143673c
|
Section 607 permits agencies, in complying with sections 603 and 604, to provide either a quantifiable or numerical description of the effects of a rule or more general descriptive statements if quantification is not practicable or reliable.
|
( ( Section 607 ) ( ( ( ( ( permits ( ( agencies , ) ( in ( complying ( with ( ( ( sections 603 ) and ) 604 ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( to ( provide ( either ( ( ( ( a ( quantifiable ( or ( numerical description ) ) ) ) ( of ( ( the effects ) ( of ( a rule ) ) ) ) ) or ) ( more ( ( general descriptive ) statements ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( if ( quantification ( ( is not ) ( ( practicable or ) reliable ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Section) (NNP 607)) (VP (VBZ permits) (NP (NP (NNS agencies)) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG complying) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNS sections) (CD 603) (CC and) (CD 604))))))) (, ,) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB provide) (NP (DT either) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ quantifiable) (CC or) (JJ numerical) (NN description)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS effects)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NN rule)))))) (CC or) (NP (RBR more) (ADJP (JJ general) (JJ descriptive)) (NNS statements)))))) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (NN quantification)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ practicable) (CC or) (JJ reliable)))))) (. .)))
|
Agencies can submit a general descriptive statement on a rule because sections 607 and 603 disagree with one another.
|
( Agencies ( ( can ( ( submit ( ( a ( ( general descriptive ) statement ) ) ( on ( a rule ) ) ) ) ( because ( ( sections ( ( 607 and ) 603 ) ) ( disagree ( with ( one another ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNPS Agencies)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB submit) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (JJ general) (JJ descriptive)) (NN statement)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (NN rule)))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (NNS sections) (NNP 607) (CC and) (NNP 603)) (VP (VBP disagree) (PP (IN with) (NP (CD one) (DT another)))))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Section 607 permits agencies, in complying with sections 603 and 604, to provide either a quantifiable or numerical description of the effects of a rule or more general descriptive statements if quantification is not practicable or reliable.
Then the following statement: "Agencies can submit a general descriptive statement on a rule because sections 607 and 603 disagree with one another." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
27,888 |
27888n
|
However, sometimes it seems that the city produced artists of this stature by accident, even against its will.
|
( However ( , ( sometimes ( it ( ( seems ( that ( ( the city ) ( ( ( ( ( produced ( artists ( of ( this stature ) ) ) ) ( by accident ) ) , ) even ) ( against ( its will ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB sometimes)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ seems) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN city)) (VP (VBD produced) (NP (NP (NNS artists)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NN stature)))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN accident))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB even)) (PP (IN against) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN will))))))) (. .)))
|
The city is a haven for liberal arts.
|
( ( The city ) ( ( is ( ( a haven ) ( for ( liberal arts ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN city)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN haven)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ liberal) (NNS arts))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: However, sometimes it seems that the city produced artists of this stature by accident, even against its will.
Then the following statement: "The city is a haven for liberal arts." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
47,410 |
47410c
|
States like Minnesota and New Jersey spend three times more than California to meet the poor's legal needs, Connecticut and Massachusetts spend more than twice as much, and countries like England, Canada, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand spend anywhere from two to 14 times more proportionately than California, despite the fact that California has the world's sixth largest economy.
|
( ( ( ( ( ( States ( like ( Minnesota ( and ( New Jersey ) ) ) ) ) ( ( spend ( ( three ( times more ) ) ( than California ) ) ) ( to ( meet ( ( the ( poor 's ) ) ( legal needs ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( ( Connecticut and ) Massachusetts ) ( spend ( more ( ( ( than twice ) as ) much ) ) ) ) , ) ) ) and ) ( ( countries ( like ( England ( , ( Canada ( , ( Australia ( , ( Scotland ( and ( New Zealand ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( spend ( anywhere ( ( from ( ( two ( to ( 14 times ) ) ) more ) ) proportionately ) ) ) ( than California ) ) , ) ( despite ( ( the fact ) ( that ( California ( has ( ( the ( world 's ) ) ( ( sixth largest ) economy ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (NNPS States)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NNP Minnesota) (CC and) (NNP New) (NNP Jersey)))) (VP (VBP spend) (NP (NP (QP (CD three) (NNS times) (RBR more))) (PP (IN than) (NP (NNP California)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB meet) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN poor) (POS 's)) (JJ legal) (NNS needs))))))) (PRN (, ,) (S (NP (NNP Connecticut) (CC and) (NNP Massachusetts)) (VP (VBP spend) (NP (QP (JJR more) (IN than) (RB twice) (IN as) (JJ much))))) (, ,)) (CC and) (S (NP (NP (NNS countries)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NNP England) (, ,) (NNP Canada) (, ,) (NNP Australia) (, ,) (NNP Scotland) (CC and) (NNP New) (NNP Zealand)))) (VP (VBP spend) (ADVP (RB anywhere) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (QP (CD two) (TO to) (CD 14) (NNS times))) (JJR more)) (ADVP (RB proportionately)))) (PP (IN than) (NP (NNP California))) (, ,) (PP (IN despite) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN fact)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP California)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN world) (POS 's)) (ADJP (RB sixth) (JJS largest)) (NN economy))))))))) (. .)))
|
Minnesota spends much less than California on legal assistance for the poor.
|
( Minnesota ( ( spends ( ( much ( less ( than California ) ) ) ( on ( ( legal assistance ) ( for ( the poor ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Minnesota)) (VP (VBZ spends) (ADJP (ADJP (RB much) (JJR less) (PP (IN than) (NP (NNP California)))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (JJ legal) (NN assistance)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ poor))))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: States like Minnesota and New Jersey spend three times more than California to meet the poor's legal needs, Connecticut and Massachusetts spend more than twice as much, and countries like England, Canada, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand spend anywhere from two to 14 times more proportionately than California, despite the fact that California has the world's sixth largest economy.
Then the following statement: "Minnesota spends much less than California on legal assistance for the poor." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
135,730 |
135730n
|
was this uh done not by TI people was it
|
( was ( ( this uh ) ( done ( not ( by ( TI ( people ( was it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SINV (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT this) (NN uh)) (VP (VBN done) (PP (RB not) (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP TI)) (SBAR (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (PRP it)))))))))))
|
It wasn't done by TI people, but rather by artists.
|
( It ( ( ( was n't ) ( done ( ( ( ( ( by ( TI people ) ) , ) but ) rather ) ( by artists ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (VP (VBN done) (PP (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP TI) (NNS people))) (, ,) (CC but) (RB rather) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS artists)))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: was this uh done not by TI people was it
Then the following statement: "It wasn't done by TI people, but rather by artists." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
137,756 |
137756n
|
that was even harder actually because it was you know it was just a change of
|
( that ( was ( ( even harder ) ( actually ( because ( it ( was ( you ( know ( it ( ( was just ) ( ( a change ) of ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (ADJP (RB even) (JJR harder)) (SBAR (ADVP (RB actually)) (IN because) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB just)) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN change)) (PP (IN of)))))))))))))))))
|
It was harder emotionally than mentally.
|
( It ( ( ( was ( harder emotionally ) ) ( than mentally ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RBR harder) (RB emotionally)) (PP (IN than) (NP (NNP mentally)))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: that was even harder actually because it was you know it was just a change of
Then the following statement: "It was harder emotionally than mentally." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
37,101 |
37101c
|
The five local programs in addition to Bronx Legal Services and Brooklyn Legal Services Corp.
|
( ( ( ( The ( five ( local programs ) ) ) ( in addition ) ) ( to ( ( ( Bronx ( Legal Services ) ) and ) ( Brooklyn ( Legal ( Services Corp. ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT The) (CD five) (JJ local) (NNS programs)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN addition))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP Bronx) (NNP Legal) (NNPS Services)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Brooklyn) (NNP Legal) (NNPS Services) (NNP Corp.)))) (. .)))
|
The Bronx Legal Services was disbanded.
|
( ( The ( Bronx ( Legal Services ) ) ) ( ( was disbanded ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Bronx) (NNP Legal) (NNP Services)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN disbanded))) (. .)))
|
government
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The five local programs in addition to Bronx Legal Services and Brooklyn Legal Services Corp.
Then the following statement: "The Bronx Legal Services was disbanded." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
51,545 |
51545n
|
William Powers, UT law school dean, says the project will benefit the students who participate, teaching them early in their careers about the need for pro bono service.
|
( ( ( ( ( William Powers ) , ) ( UT ( law ( school dean ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( says ( ( the project ) ( will ( benefit ( ( the students ) ( who ( ( participate , ) ( ( ( teaching them ) ( early ( in ( their careers ) ) ) ) ( about ( ( the need ) ( for ( ( pro bono ) service ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP William) (NNP Powers)) (, ,) (NP (NNP UT) (NN law) (NN school) (NN dean)) (, ,)) (VP (VBZ says) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN project)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB benefit) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS students)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP participate) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG teaching) (NP (PRP them)) (ADVP (RB early) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS careers)))) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN need)) (PP (IN for) (NP (ADJP (FW pro) (FW bono)) (NN service)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
William Powers is the only law school dean to come forward and say that the project will benefit the students who participate.
|
( ( William Powers ) ( ( ( ( ( is ( the ( only ( law ( school dean ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( come forward ) ) ) and ) ( say ( that ( ( the project ) ( will ( benefit ( ( the students ) ( who participate ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP William) (NNP Powers)) (VP (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT the) (JJ only) (NN law) (NN school) (NN dean)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB come) (ADVP (RB forward)))))) (CC and) (VP (VBP say) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN project)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB benefit) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS students)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP participate))))))))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: William Powers, UT law school dean, says the project will benefit the students who participate, teaching them early in their careers about the need for pro bono service.
Then the following statement: "William Powers is the only law school dean to come forward and say that the project will benefit the students who participate. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
99,477 |
99477e
|
I thought that lawyer chap had quit! 161 Chapter 19 Jane Finn "MY train got in half an hour ago," explained Julius, as he led the way out of the station.
|
( ( I ( thought ( that ( ( lawyer chap ) ( had ( ( quit ! ) ( ( 161 ( Chapter ( 19 ( Jane ( Finn ( `` ( MY train ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( got ( ( in ( half ( an hour ) ) ) ago ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( '' ( ( explained ( ( Julius , ) ( as ( he ( ( ( led ( the way ) ) out ) ( of ( the station ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SINV (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN lawyer) (NN chap)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (NNP quit) (. !)) (SBAR (S (NP (CD 161) (NNP Chapter) (CD 19) (NNP Jane) (CD Finn) (`` ``) (NNP MY) (NN train)) (VP (VBD got) (PP (IN in) (NP (QP (PDT half) (DT an) (NN hour))) (ADVP (IN ago)))))))))))) (, ,) ('' '') (VP (VBD explained)) (NP (NP (NNP Julius)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD led) (NP (DT the) (NN way)) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN station))))))) (. .)))
|
My train arrived about a half an hour ago.
|
( ( My train ) ( ( arrived ( ( ( about ( a half ) ) ( an hour ) ) ago ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NN train)) (VP (VBD arrived) (ADVP (NP (NP (QP (RB about) (DT a) (NN half))) (NP (DT an) (NN hour))) (IN ago))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: I thought that lawyer chap had quit! 161 Chapter 19 Jane Finn "MY train got in half an hour ago," explained Julius, as he led the way out of the station.
Then the following statement: "My train arrived about a half an hour ago. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
98,045 |
98045c
|
Whether you want to watch Mike Tyson pulverize his opponents, bet on the New York Giants at a sports book, or play 18 holes of golf, all it takes is the right toys and/or plenty of cash.
|
( ( ( Whether ( you ( want ( to ( watch ( ( Mike Tyson ) ( ( ( ( ( ( pulverize ( his opponents ) ) , ) ( ( bet ( on ( the ( New ( York Giants ) ) ) ) ) ( at ( a ( sports book ) ) ) ) ) , ) or ) ( play ( ( 18 holes ) ( of golf ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( all ( it takes ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( the ( right ( toys ( and/or plenty ) ) ) ) ( of cash ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (SINV (S (SBAR (IN Whether) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB watch) (S (NP (NNP Mike) (NNP Tyson)) (VP (VP (VB pulverize) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS opponents))) (, ,) (VP (VB bet) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NNP New) (NNP York) (NNPS Giants))) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT a) (NNS sports) (NN book)))) (, ,) (CC or) (VP (VB play) (NP (NP (CD 18) (NNS holes)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN golf))))))))))))) (, ,) (RB all) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ takes))) (VP (VBZ is)) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ right) (NNS toys) (NN and/or) (NN plenty)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN cash)))) (. .)))
|
All activities are free and open to the public.
|
( ( All activities ) ( ( ( are ( ( free and ) open ) ) ( to ( the public ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT All) (NNS activities)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ free) (CC and) (JJ open)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN public)))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Whether you want to watch Mike Tyson pulverize his opponents, bet on the New York Giants at a sports book, or play 18 holes of golf, all it takes is the right toys and/or plenty of cash.
Then the following statement: "All activities are free and open to the public." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
41,045 |
41045n
|
Pretty soon, the papers will be breathlessly revealing that talk-show couch conversations are scripted and that Sam Donaldson employs fake hair and real researchers.
|
( ( Pretty soon ) ( , ( ( the papers ) ( ( will ( be ( breathlessly ( revealing ( ( ( that ( ( talk-show ( couch conversations ) ) ( are scripted ) ) ) and ) ( that ( ( Sam Donaldson ) ( employs ( ( ( fake hair ) and ) ( real researchers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Pretty) (RB soon)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNS papers)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (ADVP (RB breathlessly)) (VBG revealing) (SBAR (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (JJ talk-show) (NN couch) (NNS conversations)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN scripted))))) (CC and) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Sam) (NNP Donaldson)) (VP (VBZ employs) (NP (NP (JJ fake) (NN hair)) (CC and) (NP (JJ real) (NNS researchers)))))))))) (. .)))
|
Sam Donaldson is totally bald under his wig.
|
( ( Sam Donaldson ) ( ( is ( totally ( bald ( under ( his wig ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sam) (NNP Donaldson)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB totally) (JJ bald) (PP (IN under) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN wig))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Pretty soon, the papers will be breathlessly revealing that talk-show couch conversations are scripted and that Sam Donaldson employs fake hair and real researchers.
Then the following statement: "Sam Donaldson is totally bald under his wig." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
122,925 |
122925n
|
She left the note on the table.
|
( She ( ( ( left ( the note ) ) ( on ( the table ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD left) (NP (DT the) (NN note)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN table)))) (. .)))
|
The note was never found by the intended recipient.
|
( ( The note ) ( ( ( was never ) ( found ( by ( the ( intended recipient ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN note)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN found) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (VBN intended) (NN recipient))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: She left the note on the table.
Then the following statement: "The note was never found by the intended recipient." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
69,948 |
69948e
|
Festa de San Pedoa (29 June): Boisterous Christian tribute to Peter, the patron saint of fishermen, in Melaka, where the Portuguese community has its fishing boats blessed.
|
( ( ( ( ( Festa ( de ( San Pedoa ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( 29 June ) -RRB- ) ) ) : ) ( ( Boisterous ( Christian tribute ) ) ( to ( ( ( ( ( ( Peter , ) ( ( the ( patron saint ) ) ( of fishermen ) ) ) , ) ( in Melaka ) ) , ) ( where ( ( the ( Portuguese community ) ) ( has ( ( its ( fishing boats ) ) blessed ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (NP (NP (NNP Festa) (IN de) (NNP San) (NNP Pedoa)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (CD 29)) (NP (NNP June))) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (: :) (NP (NP (NNP Boisterous) (NNP Christian) (NNP tribute)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Peter)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN patron) (NN saint)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS fishermen)))) (, ,)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Melaka))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP Portuguese) (NN community)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN fishing) (NNS boats)) (VP (VBN blessed))))))))) (. .)))
|
It's a tribute to Peter.
|
( It ( ( 's ( ( a tribute ) ( to Peter ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN tribute)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Peter))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Festa de San Pedoa (29 June): Boisterous Christian tribute to Peter, the patron saint of fishermen, in Melaka, where the Portuguese community has its fishing boats blessed.
Then the following statement: "It's a tribute to Peter." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
20,814 |
20814n
|
We issued our second report in January 2001.
|
( We ( ( ( issued ( our ( second report ) ) ) ( in ( January 2001 ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VBD issued) (NP (PRP$ our) (JJ second) (NN report)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP January) (CD 2001)))) (. .)))
|
The second report was issued on January 28, 2001.
|
( ( The ( second report ) ) ( ( was ( issued ( on ( ( ( January 28 ) , ) 2001 ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ second) (NN report)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN issued) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP January) (CD 28) (, ,) (CD 2001))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: We issued our second report in January 2001.
Then the following statement: "The second report was issued on January 28, 2001. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
122,230 |
122230e
|
Many are still standing, and some are registered as National Treasures.
|
( ( ( ( ( Many ( ( are still ) standing ) ) , ) and ) ( some ( are ( registered ( as ( National Treasures ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT Many)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VBG standing)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT some)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN registered) (PP (IN as) (NP (NNP National) (NNPS Treasures)))))) (. .)))
|
There are many that is still intact, while some of them are considered National Treasures.
|
( There ( ( are ( many ( that ( ( ( ( is still ) intact ) , ) ( while ( ( some ( of them ) ) ( are ( considered ( National Treasures ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ many) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB still)) (ADJP (JJ intact)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN while) (S (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP them)))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN considered) (NP (NNP National) (NNP Treasures))))))))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Many are still standing, and some are registered as National Treasures.
Then the following statement: "There are many that is still intact, while some of them are considered National Treasures." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
141,653 |
141653c
|
i need to look into it more you know it's you know it sometimes even with the newspaper they say they'll only take certain types of paper you know they won't take paper that's shiny
|
( i ( ( need ( to ( look ( into it ) ) ) ) ( more ( you ( know ( it ( 's ( you ( ( know it ) ( sometimes ( even ( with ( ( the newspaper ) ( they ( say ( they ( ( 'll only ) ( take ( ( ( certain types ) ( of paper ) ) ( you ( know ( they ( ( wo n't ) ( take ( paper ( that ( 's shiny ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB look) (PP (IN into) (NP (PRP it)))))) (ADVP (ADVP (RBR more)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (ADVP (RB sometimes)) (RB even) (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN newspaper)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP say) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD 'll) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VB take) (NP (NP (JJ certain) (NNS types)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN paper))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD wo) (RB n't) (VP (VB take) (NP (NP (NN paper)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ shiny))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
|
They take all types of paper.
|
( They ( ( take ( ( all types ) ( of paper ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP take) (NP (NP (DT all) (NNS types)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN paper))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: i need to look into it more you know it's you know it sometimes even with the newspaper they say they'll only take certain types of paper you know they won't take paper that's shiny
Then the following statement: "They take all types of paper." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
5,901 |
5901n
|
i don't know because i know i don't watch while i'm up here at school i don't watch hardly any TV like Thursday night i like to sit down and watch a few shows but other than that
|
( i ( ( do n't ) ( know ( because ( i ( know ( i ( ( do n't ) ( watch ( while ( i ( ( ( 'm ( up ( here ( at ( school ( i ( ( do n't ) ( ( watch hardly ) ( ( ( any TV ) ( like ( Thursday night ) ) ) ( i ( like ( to ( ( ( sit down ) and ) ( watch ( a ( few shows ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( other ( than that ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB watch) (SBAR (IN while) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VP (VBP 'm) (ADVP (RB up) (RB here) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NN school)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB watch) (ADVP (RB hardly)) (NP (NP (DT any) (NN TV)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NNP Thursday) (NN night))) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP like) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB sit) (PRT (RP down))) (CC and) (VP (VB watch) (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (NNS shows)))))))))))))))))) (CC but) (VP (ADJP (JJ other)) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT that))))))))))))))))))
|
I am not a big fan of television at all.
|
( I ( ( ( am not ) ( ( a ( big fan ) ) ( of ( television ( at all ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP am) (RB not) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ big) (NN fan)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN television)) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: i don't know because i know i don't watch while i'm up here at school i don't watch hardly any TV like Thursday night i like to sit down and watch a few shows but other than that
Then the following statement: "I am not a big fan of television at all." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
92,061 |
92061e
|
The rights to that name have been claimed by another Web site.
|
( ( ( The rights ) ( to ( that name ) ) ) ( ( have ( been ( claimed ( by ( another ( Web site ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS rights)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT that) (NN name)))) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN claimed) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT another) (NNP Web) (NN site)))))) (. .)))
|
The rights to that name have been taken by another Web site.
|
( ( ( The rights ) ( to ( that name ) ) ) ( ( have ( been ( taken ( by ( another ( Web site ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS rights)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT that) (NN name)))) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN taken) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT another) (NNP Web) (NN site)))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The rights to that name have been claimed by another Web site.
Then the following statement: "The rights to that name have been taken by another Web site." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
144,821 |
144821n
|
The installation of an SCR system requires a significant amount of labor.
|
( ( ( The installation ) ( of ( an ( SCR system ) ) ) ) ( ( requires ( ( a ( significant amount ) ) ( of labor ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN installation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT an) (NNP SCR) (NN system)))) (VP (VBZ requires) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ significant) (NN amount)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN labor))))) (. .)))
|
SCR systems are typically difficult and tiresome to install.
|
( ( SCR systems ) ( ( ( are typically ) ( ( ( difficult and ) tiresome ) ( to install ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP SCR) (NNS systems)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB typically)) (ADJP (JJ difficult) (CC and) (JJ tiresome) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB install)))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The installation of an SCR system requires a significant amount of labor.
Then the following statement: "SCR systems are typically difficult and tiresome to install." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
106,064 |
106064e
|
Yes, that's possible, admitted John.
|
( ( ( ( Yes , ) ( that ( 's possible ) ) ) , ) ( ( admitted John ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Yes)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ possible))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD admitted) (NP (NNP John))) (. .)))
|
John agreed that what I thought was possible.
|
( John ( ( agreed ( that ( ( what ( I thought ) ) ( was possible ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP John)) (VP (VBD agreed) (SBAR (IN that) (S (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought)))) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ possible)))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Yes, that's possible, admitted John.
Then the following statement: "John agreed that what I thought was possible. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
141,744 |
141744c
|
Recognizing that certain types of proposed service innovations merit consideration under specialized procedures, the Commission has adopted several sets of rules that are customized for defined categories of Postal Service requests.
|
( ( Recognizing ( that ( ( ( certain types ) ( of ( proposed ( service innovations ) ) ) ) ( ( merit consideration ) ( under ( specialized procedures ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the Commission ) ( ( has ( adopted ( ( several sets ) ( of ( rules ( that ( are ( customized ( for ( ( defined categories ) ( of ( Postal ( Service requests ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Recognizing) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (JJ certain) (NNS types)) (PP (IN of) (NP (VBN proposed) (NN service) (NNS innovations)))) (VP (VBP merit) (NP (NN consideration)) (PP (IN under) (NP (VBN specialized) (NNS procedures)))))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP Commission)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN adopted) (NP (NP (JJ several) (NNS sets)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS rules)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN customized) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ defined) (NNS categories)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Postal) (NNP Service) (NNS requests)))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
All types of proposed service innovations should be considered.
|
( ( ( All types ) ( of ( proposed ( service innovations ) ) ) ) ( ( should ( be considered ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT All) (NNS types)) (PP (IN of) (NP (VBN proposed) (NN service) (NNS innovations)))) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN considered)))) (. .)))
|
government
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Recognizing that certain types of proposed service innovations merit consideration under specialized procedures, the Commission has adopted several sets of rules that are customized for defined categories of Postal Service requests.
Then the following statement: "All types of proposed service innovations should be considered." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
51,235 |
51235c
|
He closed his eyes as the woman's screams turned into wet gasping.
|
( He ( ( ( closed ( his eyes ) ) ( as ( ( ( the ( woman 's ) ) screams ) ( turned ( into ( wet gasping ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD closed) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS eyes)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN woman) (POS 's)) (NN screams)) (VP (VBN turned) (PP (IN into) (NP (JJ wet) (NN gasping))))))) (. .)))
|
The woman was silent.
|
( ( The woman ) ( ( was silent ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN woman)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ silent))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: He closed his eyes as the woman's screams turned into wet gasping.
Then the following statement: "The woman was silent." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
107,593 |
107593c
|
Before long, however, many of these projects went bust, and Nelson had to turn to his family for financial assistance to ward off bankruptcy.
|
( ( Before long ) ( , ( ( ( ( ( however ( , ( ( many ( of ( these projects ) ) ) ( went bust ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( Nelson ( ( had ( to ( turn ( to ( ( his family ) ( for ( financial assistance ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( ward off ) bankruptcy ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (ADVP (IN Before) (RB long)) (, ,) (S (ADVP (RB however)) (, ,) (NP (NP (JJ many)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT these) (NNS projects)))) (VP (VBD went) (NP (NN bust)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NNP Nelson)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB turn) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (PRP$ his) (NN family)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ financial) (NN assistance)))))))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB ward) (PRT (RP off)) (NP (NN bankruptcy))))))) (. .)))
|
Nelson's projects were very successful, and he bought his family a new house.
|
( ( ( ( ( ( ( Nelson 's ) projects ) ( were ( very successful ) ) ) , ) and ) ( he ( bought ( ( his family ) ( a ( new house ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (NNP Nelson) (POS 's)) (NNS projects)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ successful)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD bought) (S (NP (PRP$ his) (NN family)) (NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NN house))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Before long, however, many of these projects went bust, and Nelson had to turn to his family for financial assistance to ward off bankruptcy.
Then the following statement: "Nelson's projects were very successful, and he bought his family a new house." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
72,985 |
72985n
|
Almost everyone heads to Rick's Bar, perched on the cliff top, to have a drink and set up the camera.
|
( ( Almost everyone ) ( ( heads ( to ( ( ( ( Rick 's ) Bar ) , ) ( ( ( perched ( on ( the ( cliff top ) ) ) ) , ) ( to ( ( ( have ( a drink ) ) and ) ( ( set up ) ( the camera ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (RB Almost) (NN everyone)) (VP (VBZ heads) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Rick) (POS 's)) (NN Bar)) (, ,) (VP (VBN perched) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN cliff) (NN top))) (, ,) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB have) (NP (DT a) (NN drink))) (CC and) (VP (VB set) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (DT the) (NN camera)))))))))) (. .)))
|
People love to jump from the cliff at Rick's Bar and take pictures of it.
|
( People ( ( love ( to ( ( ( jump ( from ( ( the cliff ) ( at ( ( Rick 's ) Bar ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( take ( pictures ( of it ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS People)) (VP (VBP love) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB jump) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN cliff)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NNP Rick) (POS 's)) (NN Bar)))))) (CC and) (VP (VB take) (NP (NP (NNS pictures)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP it))))))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Almost everyone heads to Rick's Bar, perched on the cliff top, to have a drink and set up the camera.
Then the following statement: "People love to jump from the cliff at Rick's Bar and take pictures of it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
128,434 |
128434c
|
Ah, here he is!" The two men rose to greet the new-comer.
|
( ( ( ( ( ( Ah ( , here ) ) ( he is ) ) ! ) '' ) ( ( The ( two men ) ) ( rose ( to ( greet ( the new-comer ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (FRAG (INTJ (UH Ah)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB here))) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ is))) (. !) ('' '') (S (NP (DT The) (CD two) (NNS men)) (VP (VBD rose) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB greet) (NP (DT the) (NN new-comer))))))) (. .)))
|
The two men did not acknowledge the newcomer.
|
( ( The ( two men ) ) ( ( ( did not ) ( acknowledge ( the newcomer ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (CD two) (NNS men)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB acknowledge) (NP (DT the) (NN newcomer)))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Ah, here he is!" The two men rose to greet the new-comer.
Then the following statement: "The two men did not acknowledge the newcomer." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
34,760 |
34760c
|
The Pinacoteca's fine collection is devoted in large part to the Bologna school, most notably the Baroque paintings of Guido Reni, and the Carracci family, of whom Annibale was the most gifted see his Annunciation and Madonna in Glory.
|
( ( ( ( ( ( ( The ( Pinacoteca 's ) ) ( fine collection ) ) ( is ( devoted ( in ( ( ( ( ( large part ) ( to ( the ( Bologna school ) ) ) ) , ) ( most notably ) ) ( ( the ( Baroque paintings ) ) ( of ( Guido Reni ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( ( ( the ( Carracci family ) ) , ) ( ( of whom ) ( Annibale ( was ( the ( most gifted ) ) ) ) ) ) ( see ( ( ( his Annunciation ) and ) ( Madonna ( in Glory ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Pinacoteca) (POS 's)) (JJ fine) (NN collection)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN devoted) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NP (JJ large) (NN part)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Bologna) (NN school)))) (, ,) (ADVP (RBS most) (RB notably)) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Baroque) (NNS paintings)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Guido) (NNP Reni))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Carracci) (NN family)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHPP (IN of) (WHNP (WP whom))) (S (NP (NNP Annibale)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT the) (RBS most) (JJ gifted)))))) (VP (VBP see) (NP (NP (PRP$ his) (NN Annunciation)) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNP Madonna)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Glory))))))) (. .)))
|
All of the works in the Pinacoteca are from the Florentine school.
|
( ( All ( of ( ( the works ) ( in ( the Pinacoteca ) ) ) ) ) ( ( are ( from ( the ( Florentine school ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT All)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS works)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Pinacoteca)))))) (VP (VBP are) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Florentine) (NN school)))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The Pinacoteca's fine collection is devoted in large part to the Bologna school, most notably the Baroque paintings of Guido Reni, and the Carracci family, of whom Annibale was the most gifted see his Annunciation and Madonna in Glory.
Then the following statement: "All of the works in the Pinacoteca are from the Florentine school." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
114,611 |
114611n
|
Some central groups relied heavily on technical assistance located in another organizational unit, while others had significant technical expertise among their own staff, and, thus, were much more involved in directly implementing and testing controls.
|
( ( Some ( central groups ) ) ( ( ( relied heavily ) ( on ( ( technical assistance ) ( ( ( ( located ( in ( ( ( ( another ( organizational unit ) ) , ) ( while ( others ( had ( ( significant ( technical expertise ) ) ( among ( their ( own staff ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ) ) and ) ( , ( thus , ) ) ) ( were ( ( much ( more involved ) ) ( in ( directly ( ( ( implementing and ) testing ) controls ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Some) (JJ central) (NNS groups)) (VP (VBD relied) (ADVP (RB heavily)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (JJ technical) (NN assistance)) (VP (VP (VBN located) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT another) (JJ organizational) (NN unit)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN while) (S (NP (NNS others)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (JJ significant) (JJ technical) (NN expertise)) (PP (IN among) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ own) (NN staff))))))) (, ,)))) (CC and) (PRN (, ,) (ADVP (RB thus)) (, ,)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (ADJP (RB much) (RBR more) (JJ involved)) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (ADVP (RB directly)) (VBG implementing) (CC and) (VBG testing) (NP (NNS controls))))))))))) (. .)))
|
The groups with internal experts were more efficient.
|
( ( ( The groups ) ( with ( internal experts ) ) ) ( ( were ( more efficient ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS groups)) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ internal) (NNS experts)))) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ efficient))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Some central groups relied heavily on technical assistance located in another organizational unit, while others had significant technical expertise among their own staff, and, thus, were much more involved in directly implementing and testing controls.
Then the following statement: "The groups with internal experts were more efficient." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
77,032 |
77032e
|
The curious thing is that they certainly did not know anything about you when they first held you prisoner.
|
( ( The ( curious thing ) ) ( ( is ( that ( they ( certainly ( ( did not ) ( ( ( know anything ) ( about you ) ) ( when ( they ( first ( held ( you prisoner ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ curious) (NN thing)) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (ADVP (RB certainly)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB know) (NP (NN anything)) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP you))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (ADVP (RB first)) (VP (VBD held) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBZ prisoner)))))))))))) (. .)))
|
Nothing was known about them when they were first imprisoned.
|
( Nothing ( ( was ( ( known ( about them ) ) ( when ( they ( were ( first imprisoned ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Nothing)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN known) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP them))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (ADVP (RB first)) (VBN imprisoned))))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The curious thing is that they certainly did not know anything about you when they first held you prisoner.
Then the following statement: "Nothing was known about them when they were first imprisoned." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
16,214 |
16214c
|
Prior to 1970, the array of mail services provided by the Post Office Department was codified as part of Title 39.
|
( ( Prior ( to 1970 ) ) ( , ( ( ( the array ) ( of ( ( mail services ) ( provided ( by ( the ( Post ( Office Department ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( was ( codified ( as ( part ( of ( Title 39 ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (RB Prior) (PP (TO to) (NP (CD 1970)))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN array)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN mail) (NNS services)) (VP (VBN provided) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NNP Post) (NNP Office) (NNP Department))))))) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN codified) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Title) (CD 39))))))) (. .)))
|
The Post Office Department has only ever offered one mail service.
|
( ( The ( Post ( Office Department ) ) ) ( ( ( has only ) ( ever ( offered ( one ( mail service ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Post) (NNP Office) (NNP Department)) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (ADVP (RB ever)) (VBN offered) (NP (CD one) (NN mail) (NN service)))) (. .)))
|
government
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Prior to 1970, the array of mail services provided by the Post Office Department was codified as part of Title 39.
Then the following statement: "The Post Office Department has only ever offered one mail service." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
91,654 |
91654e
|
The Getty Conservation Institute in California recently sponsored a virtual-reality recreation of Queen Nefertari's tomb in Egypt, which purports to let cyberexplorers look at the 3200-year-old wall paintings ...
|
( ( ( The ( Getty ( Conservation Institute ) ) ) ( in California ) ) ( recently ( ( ( sponsored ( ( a ( virtual-reality recreation ) ) ( of ( ( Queen ( Nefertari 's ) ) tomb ) ) ) ) ( in ( ( Egypt , ) ( which ( purports ( to ( let ( cyberexplorers ( look ( at ( the ( 3200-year-old ( wall paintings ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ... ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Getty) (NNP Conservation) (NNP Institute)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP California)))) (ADVP (RB recently)) (VP (VBD sponsored) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ virtual-reality) (NN recreation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Queen) (NNP Nefertari) (POS 's)) (NN tomb)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Egypt)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ purports) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB let) (S (NP (NNS cyberexplorers)) (VP (VB look) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (JJ 3200-year-old) (NN wall) (NNS paintings)))))))))))))) (: ...)))
|
The Getty Conservation Institute is in California.
|
( ( The ( Getty ( Conservation Institute ) ) ) ( ( is ( in California ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Getty) (NNP Conservation) (NNP Institute)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP California)))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The Getty Conservation Institute in California recently sponsored a virtual-reality recreation of Queen Nefertari's tomb in Egypt, which purports to let cyberexplorers look at the 3200-year-old wall paintings ...
Then the following statement: "The Getty Conservation Institute is in California." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
72,310 |
72310n
|
Built by Mehmet the Conqueror between 1462 and 1470, the complex was almost completely destroyed by an earthquake in 1766.
|
( ( Built ( by ( ( Mehmet ( the Conqueror ) ) ( between ( ( 1462 and ) 1470 ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the complex ) ( ( ( was ( almost completely ) ) ( destroyed ( by ( ( an earthquake ) ( in 1766 ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBN Built) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP Mehmet) (DT the) (NNP Conqueror)) (PP (IN between) (NP (CD 1462) (CC and) (CD 1470))))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN complex)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB almost) (RB completely)) (VP (VBN destroyed) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN earthquake)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1766))))))) (. .)))
|
The complex was restored after the earthquake, a process that took 10 years.
|
( ( The complex ) ( ( was ( restored ( after ( ( ( the earthquake ) , ) ( ( a process ) ( that ( took ( 10 years ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN complex)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN restored) (PP (IN after) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN earthquake)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN process)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD took) (NP (CD 10) (NNS years)))))))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Built by Mehmet the Conqueror between 1462 and 1470, the complex was almost completely destroyed by an earthquake in 1766.
Then the following statement: "The complex was restored after the earthquake, a process that took 10 years." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
24,318 |
24318e
|
did um-hum um did you have another a big tent like uh um for like a looks like a sitting area type you know like a two room type tent
|
( did ( ( um-hum um ) ( did ( you ( have ( another ( ( ( ( a ( big tent ) ) ( like ( uh um ) ) ) ( for ( ( like ( ( a looks ) ( like ( a ( sitting ( area type ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( know ( like ( a ( two ( room type ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) tent ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SINV (VBD did) (NP (NP (JJ um-hum) (NN um)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBD did) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT another) (VP (NP (DT a) (JJ big) (NN tent)) (PP (IN like) (NP (JJ uh) (NN um))) (SBAR (IN for) (S (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (DT a) (NNS looks)) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (VBG sitting) (NN area) (NN type))))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (CD two) (NN room) (NN type))))))) (NN tent)))))))))))
|
Do you have a two room type tent that's big and has a seating area?
|
( ( ( Do you ) ( have ( ( a ( two ( room ( type tent ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( ( 's big ) and ) ( has ( a ( seating area ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? )
|
(ROOT (SQ (VBP Do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (CD two) (NN room) (NN type) (NN tent)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ big))) (CC and) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (DT a) (VBG seating) (NN area)))))))) (. ?)))
|
telephone
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: did um-hum um did you have another a big tent like uh um for like a looks like a sitting area type you know like a two room type tent
Then the following statement: "Do you have a two room type tent that's big and has a seating area?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
87,811 |
87811c
|
Made from a mixture of red wine, lemon and orange juice and peel, brandy, and mineral water with ice, it may strike you as too heavy to be consumed with a meal.
|
( ( ( Made ( from ( a ( ( ( ( mixture ( of ( red wine ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( lemon ( and ( orange juice ) ) ) and ) peel ) ) ( , ( brandy ( , ( and ( mineral water ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( with ice ) ) ( , ( it ( ( may ( strike ( you ( ( as ( too heavy ) ) ( to ( be ( consumed ( with ( a meal ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBN Made) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT a) (NX (NX (NX (NN mixture)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ red) (NN wine))) (, ,) (NP (NP (JJ lemon) (CC and) (JJ orange) (NN juice)) (CC and) (NP (NN peel)))) (, ,) (NX (NN brandy)) (, ,) (CC and) (NX (JJ mineral) (NN water))))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN ice))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB strike) (S (NP (PRP you)) (ADJP (RB as) (RB too) (JJ heavy)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN consumed) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT a) (NN meal)))))))))) (. .)))
|
The drink is light and used to wash down food during meals usually.
|
( ( The drink ) ( ( is ( ( ( light and ) used ) ( to ( ( ( ( wash down ) food ) ( during meals ) ) usually ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN drink)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ light) (CC and) (JJ used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB wash) (PRT (RP down)) (NP (NN food)) (PP (IN during) (NP (NNS meals))) (ADVP (RB usually))))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Made from a mixture of red wine, lemon and orange juice and peel, brandy, and mineral water with ice, it may strike you as too heavy to be consumed with a meal.
Then the following statement: "The drink is light and used to wash down food during meals usually." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
9,952 |
9952n
|
Most of the current textual infidelity, though, occurs because the doctrine of stare decisis --which dictates adherence to precedent--forces today's judges to live with adventurous Supreme Court decisions from earlier in the century.
|
( ( Most ( of ( the ( current ( textual infidelity ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( though ( , ( ( occurs ( because ( ( ( ( ( ( the doctrine ) ( of ( stare decisis ) ) ) -- ) ( which ( ( dictates adherence ) ( to precedent ) ) ) ) -- ) ( forces ( ( today 's ) ( judges ( to ( ( live ( with ( adventurous ( Supreme ( Court decisions ) ) ) ) ) ( from ( earlier ( in ( the century ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJS Most)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ current) (JJ textual) (NN infidelity)))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB though)) (, ,) (VP (VBZ occurs) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN doctrine)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ stare) (NNS decisis)))) (: --) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ dictates) (NP (NN adherence)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN precedent)))))) (: --)) (VP (VBZ forces) (NP (NP (NN today) (POS 's)) (NNS judges) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB live) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ adventurous) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court) (NNS decisions))) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (JJR earlier)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN century))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
Because of historical precedent, judges today find it difficult to make new law.
|
( ( Because ( of ( historical precedent ) ) ) ( , ( judges ( today ( ( find ( it ( difficult ( to ( make ( new law ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Because) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ historical) (NN precedent)))) (, ,) (NP (NNS judges)) (NP (NN today)) (VP (VBP find) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (JJ difficult) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (JJ new) (NN law)))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Most of the current textual infidelity, though, occurs because the doctrine of stare decisis --which dictates adherence to precedent--forces today's judges to live with adventurous Supreme Court decisions from earlier in the century.
Then the following statement: "Because of historical precedent, judges today find it difficult to make new law. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
107,770 |
107770c
|
In the preamble, HUD states that no further review is necessary.
|
( ( In ( the preamble ) ) ( , ( HUD ( ( states ( that ( ( no ( further review ) ) ( is necessary ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (NN preamble))) (, ,) (NP (NNP HUD)) (VP (VBZ states) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT no) (JJ further) (NN review)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ necessary)))))) (. .)))
|
In the preamble, HUD declares that an in-depth review is needed.
|
( ( In ( the preamble ) ) ( , ( HUD ( ( declares ( that ( ( an ( in-depth review ) ) ( is needed ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (NN preamble))) (, ,) (NP (NNP HUD)) (VP (VBZ declares) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT an) (JJ in-depth) (NN review)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN needed)))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: In the preamble, HUD states that no further review is necessary.
Then the following statement: "In the preamble, HUD declares that an in-depth review is needed." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
120,429 |
120429n
|
uh i mean my friends who are having children are having them at age thirty
|
( ( uh i ) ( mean ( ( ( my friends ) ( who ( are ( having children ) ) ) ) ( are ( ( having them ) ( at ( age thirty ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP uh) (NNP i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (NNS friends)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG having) (NP (NNS children))))))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG having) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN age) (CD thirty))))))))))
|
My friends are having kids only when they are exactly thirty years old.
|
( ( My friends ) ( ( are ( ( having kids ) ( ( only when ) ( they ( ( are exactly ) ( ( thirty years ) old ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NNS friends)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG having) (NP (NNS kids)) (SBAR (WHADVP (RB only) (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB exactly)) (ADJP (NP (CD thirty) (NNS years)) (JJ old))))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: uh i mean my friends who are having children are having them at age thirty
Then the following statement: "My friends are having kids only when they are exactly thirty years old." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
19,636 |
19636e
|
Plano actually they went out and they had the where where i live they had the they had the classes on the SAT i've never heard anything so preposterous in my life
|
( Plano ( ( ( actually ( they ( went out ) ) ) and ) ( they ( had ( the ( where ( ( where ( i ( live ( they ( had ( the ( they ( had ( ( the classes ) ( on ( the SAT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( i ( ( 've never ) ( ( heard ( anything ( so preposterous ) ) ) ( in ( my life ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Plano) (S (S (ADVP (RB actually)) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP out)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT the)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP live) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (DT the) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS classes)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NNP SAT))))))))))))) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 've) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN heard) (NP (NP (NN anything)) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ preposterous))) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN life))))))))))))))
|
They had those SAT classes where I lived and I thought that was completely ridiculous.
|
( ( ( ( They ( ( had ( those ( SAT classes ) ) ) ( where ( I lived ) ) ) ) and ) ( I ( thought ( that ( was ( completely ridiculous ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (DT those) (NNP SAT) (NNS classes)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD lived)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB completely) (JJ ridiculous))))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Plano actually they went out and they had the where where i live they had the they had the classes on the SAT i've never heard anything so preposterous in my life
Then the following statement: "They had those SAT classes where I lived and I thought that was completely ridiculous." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
106,705 |
106705c
|
Much of this energy can be attributed to the residents themselves.
|
( ( Much ( of ( this energy ) ) ) ( ( can ( be ( attributed ( to ( ( the residents ) themselves ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (RB Much)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NN energy)))) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN attributed) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS residents)) (ADVP (PRP themselves))))))) (. .)))
|
None of the energy is coming from the residents.
|
( ( None ( of ( the energy ) ) ) ( ( is ( coming ( from ( the residents ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN None)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN energy)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG coming) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNS residents))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Much of this energy can be attributed to the residents themselves.
Then the following statement: "None of the energy is coming from the residents." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
142,034 |
142034n
|
yeah i mean it's still still admittedly a a a small minority but but it's an improvement it really is
|
( yeah ( i ( mean ( ( ( it ( 's ( still ( still ( ( admittedly ( a a ) ) ( a ( small minority ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( but ( it ( 's ( ( an improvement ) ( it ( really is ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (ADVP (RB still)) (ADVP (RB still)) (VBG admittedly) (ADVP (FW a) (FW a)) (NP (DT a) (JJ small) (NN minority))))) (CC but) (S (CC but) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN improvement)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBZ is)))))))))))))))
|
The small minority is going to start becoming the majority.
|
( ( The ( small minority ) ) ( ( is ( going ( to ( start ( becoming ( the majority ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ small) (NN minority)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB start) (S (VP (VBG becoming) (NP (DT the) (NN majority))))))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: yeah i mean it's still still admittedly a a a small minority but but it's an improvement it really is
Then the following statement: "The small minority is going to start becoming the majority." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
60,137 |
60137n
|
Primitive pottery is on display including a rather naave clay bull with an acrobat holding one horn and finer work such as a stone pyxis (jewelry box) incised with geometric patterns and a reclining animal.
|
( ( Primitive pottery ) ( ( is ( on ( display ( including ( ( a ( ( rather naave ) ( clay bull ) ) ) ( with ( ( an ( acrobat ( holding ( one ( horn ( and ( finer work ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( such ( as ( ( ( a ( stone pyxis ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( jewelry box ) -RRB- ) ) ) ( incised ( with ( ( ( geometric patterns ) and ) ( a ( reclining animal ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Primitive) (NN pottery)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NN display)) (PP (VBG including) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB rather) (JJ naave)) (NN clay) (NN bull)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN acrobat) (NN holding) (CD one) (NN horn) (CC and) (NN finer) (NN work)) (PP (JJ such) (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN stone) (NNS pyxis)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NN jewelry) (NN box)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (VP (VBN incised) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (JJ geometric) (NNS patterns)) (CC and) (NP (DT a) (VBG reclining) (NN animal)))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
The pottery includes decorative vases.
|
( ( The pottery ) ( ( includes ( decorative vases ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN pottery)) (VP (VBZ includes) (NP (JJ decorative) (NNS vases))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Primitive pottery is on display including a rather naave clay bull with an acrobat holding one horn and finer work such as a stone pyxis (jewelry box) incised with geometric patterns and a reclining animal.
Then the following statement: "The pottery includes decorative vases. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
67,513 |
67513e
|
They crossed swords in a blaze of shining steel.
|
( They ( ( ( crossed swords ) ( in ( ( a blaze ) ( of ( shining steel ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD crossed) (NP (NNS swords)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN blaze)) (PP (IN of) (NP (VBG shining) (NN steel)))))) (. .)))
|
The blades of shining steel blazed as the swords crossed.
|
( ( ( The blades ) ( of ( shining steel ) ) ) ( ( blazed ( as ( ( the swords ) crossed ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS blades)) (PP (IN of) (NP (VBG shining) (NN steel)))) (VP (VBD blazed) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS swords)) (VP (VBD crossed))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: They crossed swords in a blaze of shining steel.
Then the following statement: "The blades of shining steel blazed as the swords crossed." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
7,532 |
7532n
|
Take no prisoners.
|
( ( Take ( no prisoners ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Take) (NP (DT no) (NNS prisoners))) (. .)))
|
Don't capture any Iraqis.
|
( ( ( Do n't ) ( capture ( any Iraqis ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Do) (RB n't) (VP (VB capture) (NP (DT any) (NNPS Iraqis)))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Take no prisoners.
Then the following statement: "Don't capture any Iraqis." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
109,072 |
109072c
|
They foggy up the brain.'
|
( They ( ( ( ( foggy up ) ( the brain ) ) . ) ' ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBZ foggy) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (DT the) (NN brain))) (. .) ('' ')))
|
They have the utmost clarity.
|
( They ( ( have ( the ( utmost clarity ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT the) (JJ utmost) (NN clarity))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: They foggy up the brain.'
Then the following statement: "They have the utmost clarity." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
126,828 |
126828c
|
On a train you're not trapped in your seat
|
( ( On ( a train ) ) ( you ( ( 're not ) ( trapped ( in ( your seat ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (DT a) (NN train))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (RB not) (VP (VBN trapped) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN seat)))))))
|
You are trapped in your seat in a train.
|
( You ( ( are ( trapped ( in ( ( your seat ) ( in ( a train ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN trapped) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (PRP$ your) (NN seat)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN train))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: On a train you're not trapped in your seat
Then the following statement: "You are trapped in your seat in a train." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
70,460 |
70460n
|
you are what are you trying to get
|
( you ( are ( what ( are ( you ( trying ( to get ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBG trying) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get))))))))))))
|
Do you need help getting what you want to get?
|
( ( ( Do you ) ( need ( help ( getting ( what ( you ( want ( to get ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? )
|
(ROOT (SQ (VBP Do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB need) (VP (VB help) (S (VP (VBG getting) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get))))))))))) (. ?)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: you are what are you trying to get
Then the following statement: "Do you need help getting what you want to get?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
136,704 |
136704e
|
For Ullswater, travel to Glenridding in the south or Pooley Bridge in the north in either place you'll find businesses that rent canoes and other water-sports equipment.
|
( ( For ( ( ( ( Ullswater , ) ( travel ( to ( Glenridding ( in ( the south ) ) ) ) ) ) or ) ( ( Pooley Bridge ) ( in ( ( the north ) ( in ( either place ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( ( 'll ( find ( businesses ( that ( rent ( canoes ( and ( other ( water-sports equipment ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (NP (NNP Ullswater)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN travel)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP Glenridding)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN south)))))) (CC or) (NP (NP (NNP Pooley) (NNP Bridge)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN north)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT either) (NN place)))))))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB find) (S (NP (NNS businesses)) (NP (DT that) (NN rent) (NNS canoes) (CC and) (JJ other) (NNS water-sports) (NN equipment))))) (. .)))
|
Glenridding is situated to the south of Ullswater.
|
( Glenridding ( ( is ( situated ( to ( ( the south ) ( of Ullswater ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Glenridding)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (VBN situated) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN south)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Ullswater))))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: For Ullswater, travel to Glenridding in the south or Pooley Bridge in the north in either place you'll find businesses that rent canoes and other water-sports equipment.
Then the following statement: "Glenridding is situated to the south of Ullswater." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
66,581 |
66581c
|
Fallon sets its OPEN in a molded plastic case, while Everbrite's mounts on a metal armature.
|
( Fallon ( ( ( ( ( sets ( its OPEN ) ) ( in ( a ( molded ( plastic case ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( while ( ( Everbrite 's ) ( mounts ( on ( a ( metal armature ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Fallon)) (VP (VBZ sets) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN OPEN)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (JJ molded) (JJ plastic) (NN case))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN while) (S (NP (NNP Everbrite) (POS 's)) (VP (VBZ mounts) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (NN metal) (NN armature))))))) (. .)))
|
Everbrite has a wood armature.
|
( Everbrite ( ( has ( a ( wood armature ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Everbrite)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (DT a) (NN wood) (NN armature))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Fallon sets its OPEN in a molded plastic case, while Everbrite's mounts on a metal armature.
Then the following statement: "Everbrite has a wood armature." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
132,066 |
132066e
|
The Pacers are veterans.
|
( ( The Pacers ) ( ( are veterans ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNPS Pacers)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NNS veterans))) (. .)))
|
Pacers are considered to be veterans.
|
( Pacers ( ( are ( considered ( to ( be veterans ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Pacers)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN considered) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (NP (NNS veterans))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The Pacers are veterans.
Then the following statement: "Pacers are considered to be veterans." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
144,910 |
144910n
|
Welcoming the decision in an editorial, the paper said it creates a No dictator or tyrant may cite national sovereignty to claim impunity from justice.
|
( ( ( Welcoming ( the decision ) ) ( in ( an editorial ) ) ) ( , ( ( the paper ) ( ( said ( it ( creates ( ( a ( ( ( No dictator ) or ) tyrant ) ) ( may ( ( cite ( national sovereignty ) ) ( to ( ( claim impunity ) ( from justice ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Welcoming) (NP (DT the) (NN decision)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT an) (NN editorial))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN paper)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ creates) (SBAR (S (NP (DT a) (NP (DT No) (NN dictator)) (CC or) (NP (NN tyrant))) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB cite) (NP (JJ national) (NN sovereignty)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB claim) (NP (NN impunity)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN justice)))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
Welcoming the decision in an editorial, the paper said it creates a new column about Formula 1.
|
( ( ( Welcoming ( the decision ) ) ( in ( an editorial ) ) ) ( , ( ( the paper ) ( ( said ( it ( creates ( ( a ( new column ) ) ( about ( Formula 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Welcoming) (NP (DT the) (NN decision)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT an) (NN editorial))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN paper)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ creates) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ new) (NN column)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NNP Formula) (CD 1)))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Welcoming the decision in an editorial, the paper said it creates a No dictator or tyrant may cite national sovereignty to claim impunity from justice.
Then the following statement: "Welcoming the decision in an editorial, the paper said it creates a new column about Formula 1." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
11,417 |
11417e
|
Later in the piece, Brill writes that Schmidt and another reporter declined all comment on their sources.
|
( ( Later ( in ( the piece ) ) ) ( , ( Brill ( ( writes ( that ( ( ( Schmidt and ) ( another reporter ) ) ( ( declined all ) ( comment ( on ( their sources ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (ADVP (RB Later)) (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN piece))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Brill)) (VP (VBZ writes) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NNP Schmidt)) (CC and) (NP (DT another) (NN reporter))) (VP (VBD declined) (RB all) (VP (VB comment) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS sources)))))))) (. .)))
|
Brill wrote a piece about Schmidt.
|
( Brill ( ( ( wrote ( a piece ) ) ( about Schmidt ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Brill)) (VP (VBD wrote) (NP (DT a) (NN piece)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NNP Schmidt)))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Later in the piece, Brill writes that Schmidt and another reporter declined all comment on their sources.
Then the following statement: "Brill wrote a piece about Schmidt." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
71,811 |
71811e
|
i would think i don't know might be a little bit different because the city interferes with the weather patterns to a certain extent because of the heating of the of the concrete and asphalt
|
( i ( would ( think ( i ( ( do n't ) ( know ( might ( ( be ( a ( little ( bit different ) ) ) ) ( because ( ( the city ) ( ( interferes ( with ( the ( weather patterns ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( a ( certain extent ) ) ( because ( of ( ( the heating ) ( of ( the ( of ( the ( ( concrete and ) asphalt ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB think) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (S (VP (MD might) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (DT a) (RB little) (NN bit) (JJ different)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT the) (NN city)) (VP (VBZ interferes) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN weather) (NNS patterns))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ certain) (NN extent)) (PP (RB because) (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN heating)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN concrete) (CC and) (NN asphalt))))))))))))))))))))))))
|
The heat from the city's concrete interferes with weather patterns.
|
( ( ( The heat ) ( from ( ( the ( city 's ) ) concrete ) ) ) ( ( interferes ( with ( weather patterns ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN heat)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN city) (POS 's)) (NN concrete)))) (VP (VBZ interferes) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN weather) (NNS patterns)))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: i would think i don't know might be a little bit different because the city interferes with the weather patterns to a certain extent because of the heating of the of the concrete and asphalt
Then the following statement: "The heat from the city's concrete interferes with weather patterns." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
137,691 |
137691n
|
On the last day of sixth grade in June of 1958, Miss Barnett (one of the greatest teachers the world has seen) let us have a party.
|
( ( On ( ( the ( last day ) ) ( of ( ( sixth grade ) ( in ( June ( of 1958 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( Miss Barnett ) ( -LRB- ( ( one ( of ( ( the ( greatest teachers ) ) ( ( the world ) ( has seen ) ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ( ( let ( us ( have ( a party ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ last) (NN day)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ sixth) (NN grade)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP June)) (PP (IN of) (NP (CD 1958))))))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Miss) (NNP Barnett)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS greatest) (NNS teachers)) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN world)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN seen)))))))) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (VP (VBD let) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP us)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT a) (NN party)))))) (. .)))
|
Barnett was kind.
|
( Barnett ( ( was kind ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Barnett)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ kind))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: On the last day of sixth grade in June of 1958, Miss Barnett (one of the greatest teachers the world has seen) let us have a party.
Then the following statement: "Barnett was kind." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
127,282 |
127282n
|
Connelly, W. L. Continuity and Change in Rural
|
( ( ( ( ( Connelly , ) ( W. ( L. Continuity ) ) ) and ) Change ) ( in Rural ) )
|
(ROOT (NP (NP (NP (NNP Connelly)) (, ,) (NP (NNP W.) (NNP L.) (NNP Continuity)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Change))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Rural)))))
|
This type of environment doesn't have cities.
|
( ( ( This type ) ( of environment ) ) ( ( ( does n't ) ( have cities ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT This) (NN type)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN environment)))) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (NNS cities)))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Connelly, W. L. Continuity and Change in Rural
Then the following statement: "This type of environment doesn't have cities." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
131,321 |
131321c
|
Several organizations had developed quarterly reporting mechanisms to summarize the status of security-related efforts.
|
( ( Several organizations ) ( ( had ( ( developed ( quarterly ( reporting mechanisms ) ) ) ( to ( summarize ( ( the status ) ( of ( security-related efforts ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Several) (NNS organizations)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN developed) (NP (JJ quarterly) (NN reporting) (NNS mechanisms)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB summarize) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN status)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ security-related) (NNS efforts))))))))) (. .)))
|
Several organizations had developed yearly mechanisms to summarize the status of revenue-related efforts.
|
( ( Several organizations ) ( ( had ( ( developed ( yearly mechanisms ) ) ( to ( summarize ( ( the status ) ( of ( revenue-related efforts ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Several) (NNS organizations)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN developed) (NP (JJ yearly) (NNS mechanisms)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB summarize) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN status)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ revenue-related) (NNS efforts))))))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Several organizations had developed quarterly reporting mechanisms to summarize the status of security-related efforts.
Then the following statement: "Several organizations had developed yearly mechanisms to summarize the status of revenue-related efforts." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
10,174 |
10174e
|
The man looked tired.
|
( ( The man ) ( ( looked tired ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN man)) (VP (VBD looked) (ADJP (JJ tired))) (. .)))
|
The man appeared to not have had sleep.
|
( ( The man ) ( ( appeared ( to ( not ( have ( had sleep ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN man)) (VP (VBD appeared) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (RB not) (VB have) (VP (VBN had) (NP (NN sleep))))))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The man looked tired.
Then the following statement: "The man appeared to not have had sleep. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
44,753 |
44753c
|
The sights of this town take scarcely a day, but the seductive tranquillity within its perfectly-preserved ramparts is irresistible.
|
( ( ( ( ( ( ( The sights ) ( of ( this town ) ) ) ( ( take scarcely ) ( a day ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( ( the ( seductive tranquillity ) ) ( within ( its ( perfectly-preserved ramparts ) ) ) ) ( is irresistible ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS sights)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NN town)))) (VP (VBP take) (ADVP (RB scarcely)) (NP (DT a) (NN day)))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (JJ seductive)) (NN tranquillity)) (PP (IN within) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ perfectly-preserved) (NNS ramparts)))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ irresistible)))) (. .)))
|
The town has very agitated sights.
|
( ( The town ) ( ( has ( ( very agitated ) sights ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN town)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (ADJP (RB very) (JJ agitated)) (NNS sights))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The sights of this town take scarcely a day, but the seductive tranquillity within its perfectly-preserved ramparts is irresistible.
Then the following statement: "The town has very agitated sights." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
100,048 |
100048e
|
Parris Glendening's supporters are so unenthused that they'll stay home if it merely drizzles.
|
( ( ( Parris ( Glendening 's ) ) supporters ) ( ( are ( so ( unenthused ( that ( they ( 'll ( ( stay home ) ( if ( it ( merely drizzles ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Parris) (NNP Glendening) (POS 's)) (NNS supporters)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ unenthused) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB stay) (NP (NN home)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB merely)) (VP (VBZ drizzles)))))))))) (. .)))
|
Parris Glendening has supporters.
|
( ( Parris Glendening ) ( ( has supporters ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Parris) (NNP Glendening)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NNS supporters))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Parris Glendening's supporters are so unenthused that they'll stay home if it merely drizzles.
Then the following statement: "Parris Glendening has supporters." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
50,803 |
50803c
|
Rocamadour
|
Rocamadour
|
(ROOT (NP (NNP Rocamadour)))
|
The Arch de Triumph.
|
( ( The ( Arch de ) ) ( Triumph . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Arch) (NNP de)) (VP (VBP Triumph)) (. .)))
|
travel
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Rocamadour
Then the following statement: "The Arch de Triumph." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
62,049 |
62049e
|
Most of the rest melts away into higher real-estate prices.
|
( ( Most ( of ( the rest ) ) ) ( ( ( melts away ) ( into ( higher ( real-estate prices ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJS Most)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN rest)))) (VP (VBZ melts) (PRT (RP away)) (PP (IN into) (NP (JJR higher) (NN real-estate) (NNS prices)))) (. .)))
|
Towards higher prices of real estate does the rest go increase into.
|
( ( ( Towards ( higher prices ) ) ( of ( real estate ) ) ) ( ( does ( ( the rest ) ( ( go increase ) into ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Towards) (JJR higher) (NNS prices)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ real) (NN estate)))) (VP (VBZ does) (S (NP (DT the) (NN rest)) (VP (VB go) (NP (NN increase)) (PP (IN into))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Most of the rest melts away into higher real-estate prices.
Then the following statement: "Towards higher prices of real estate does the rest go increase into." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
141,471 |
141471c
|
yeah i have two plots one's ten by ten and one's like fifteen by four it's a long skinny one and
|
( ( yeah ( i ( have ( ( two plots ) ( ( ( ( one 's ) ten ) ( by ( ( ten and ) one ) ) ) ( ( ( 's ( like fifteen ) ) ( by four ) ) ( it ( 's ( a ( long ( skinny one ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and )
|
(ROOT (SINV (VP (VBP yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (CD two) (NNS plots)) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (NP (CD one) (POS 's)) (NN ten)) (PP (IN by) (NP (CD ten) (CC and) (CD one)))) (VP (VBZ 's) (PP (IN like) (NP (CD fifteen))) (PP (IN by) (NP (CD four))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (JJ long) (NN skinny) (NN one))))))))))))) (NP (VB and))))
|
I just have one plot in the shape of a circle.
|
( I ( just ( ( have ( ( one plot ) ( in ( ( the shape ) ( of ( a circle ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (CD one) (NN plot)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN shape)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NN circle))))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: yeah i have two plots one's ten by ten and one's like fifteen by four it's a long skinny one and
Then the following statement: "I just have one plot in the shape of a circle." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
59,121 |
59121e
|
Swell clothes, but no class.
|
( ( Swell clothes ) ( , ( ( but ( no class ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (JJ Swell) (NNS clothes)) (, ,) (PP (CC but) (NP (DT no) (NN class))) (. .)))
|
Beautiful clothes, but no class.
|
( ( Beautiful clothes ) ( , ( ( but ( no class ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (JJ Beautiful) (NNS clothes)) (, ,) (PP (CC but) (NP (DT no) (NN class))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Swell clothes, but no class.
Then the following statement: "Beautiful clothes, but no class. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
70,989 |
70989e
|
For example, interest income on state and local government bonds, which are used primarily for infrastructure purposes, are exempt from federal taxes.
|
( ( For example ) ( , ( ( ( ( ( ( interest income ) ( on ( ( ( state and ) local ) ( government bonds ) ) ) ) , ) ( which ( are ( ( used primarily ) ( for ( infrastructure purposes ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( are ( exempt ( from ( federal taxes ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (NN example))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN interest) (NN income)) (PP (IN on) (NP (UCP (NN state) (CC and) (JJ local)) (NN government) (NNS bonds))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN used) (ADVP (RB primarily)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN infrastructure) (NNS purposes))))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ exempt) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ federal) (NNS taxes))))) (. .)))
|
Interest income on states of local government bonds are exempt from federal taxes.
|
( ( ( Interest income ) ( on ( states ( of ( local ( government bonds ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( are ( exempt ( from ( federal taxes ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN Interest) (NN income)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NNS states)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ local) (NN government) (NNS bonds)))))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ exempt) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ federal) (NNS taxes))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: For example, interest income on state and local government bonds, which are used primarily for infrastructure purposes, are exempt from federal taxes.
Then the following statement: "Interest income on states of local government bonds are exempt from federal taxes. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
96,508 |
96508e
|
But if things go badly, it is the president's fault for making the commitment.
|
( But ( ( if ( things ( go badly ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( is ( ( ( the ( president 's ) ) fault ) ( for ( making ( the commitment ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (CC But) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (NNS things)) (VP (VBP go) (ADVP (RB badly))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN president) (POS 's)) (NN fault)) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG making) (NP (DT the) (NN commitment))))))) (. .)))
|
The blame will be on the president if things were to go poorly.
|
( ( The blame ) ( ( will ( ( be ( on ( the president ) ) ) ( if ( things ( were ( to ( go poorly ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN blame)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN president))) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (NNS things)) (VP (VBD were) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB poorly)))))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: But if things go badly, it is the president's fault for making the commitment.
Then the following statement: "The blame will be on the president if things were to go poorly." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
65,664 |
65664n
|
Across the square, the H??tel de Paris is another monument of unabashed ostentation.
|
( ( Across ( the square ) ) ( , ( ( the ( H ( ?? ( tel ( de Paris ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( another monument ) ( of ( unabashed ostentation ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Across) (NP (DT the) (NN square))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP H) (NNP ??) (NNP tel) (FW de) (NNP Paris)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT another) (NN monument)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ unabashed) (NN ostentation))))) (. .)))
|
Another monument to venture towards on a nice day is Hotel de Paris.
|
( ( Another ( monument ( to ( venture ( towards ( on ( a ( nice day ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( Hotel ( de Paris ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Another) (NN monument) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB venture) (PP (IN towards) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (JJ nice) (NN day)))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NNP Hotel) (FW de) (NNP Paris))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Across the square, the H??tel de Paris is another monument of unabashed ostentation.
Then the following statement: "Another monument to venture towards on a nice day is Hotel de Paris." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
117,304 |
117304n
|
Among other things, GAO serves as the independent auditor of the largest, most diverse and most important entity on the face of the earth - the U.S.
|
( ( Among ( other things ) ) ( , ( GAO ( serves ( as ( ( the ( independent auditor ) ) ( of ( ( ( ( the ( ( largest ( , ( ( ( most diverse ) and ) ( most important ) ) ) ) entity ) ) ( on ( ( the face ) ( of ( the earth ) ) ) ) ) - ) ( the U.S. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Among) (NP (JJ other) (NNS things))) (, ,) (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (VBZ serves) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ independent) (NN auditor)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (JJS largest) (, ,) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ diverse)) (CC and) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ important))) (NN entity)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN face)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN earth)))))) (: -) (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.)))))))))
|
GAO serves as the independent auditor of the general population.
|
( GAO ( ( serves ( as ( ( the ( independent auditor ) ) ( of ( the ( general population ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (VBZ serves) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ independent) (NN auditor)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ general) (NN population)))))) (. .)))
|
government
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Among other things, GAO serves as the independent auditor of the largest, most diverse and most important entity on the face of the earth - the U.S.
Then the following statement: " GAO serves as the independent auditor of the general population." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
95,719 |
95719n
|
i can't believe that i mean when i was in junior high and high school that never happened you never heard about that
|
( i ( ( ca n't ) ( believe ( that ( i ( mean ( when ( i ( was ( in ( ( junior ( ( ( high and ) high ) school ) ) ( that ( never ( happened ( you ( never ( heard ( about that ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB believe) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (JJ junior) (ADJP (JJ high) (CC and) (JJ high)) (NN school)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBD happened) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBD heard) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT that)))))))))))))))))))))
|
Though it was never heard of, there's a possibility it could have happened.
|
( ( Though ( it ( ( was never ) ( heard of ) ) ) ) ( , ( there ( ( 's ( ( a possibility ) ( it ( could ( have happened ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN Though) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN heard) (PP (IN of)))))) (, ,) (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN possibility)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN happened)))))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: i can't believe that i mean when i was in junior high and high school that never happened you never heard about that
Then the following statement: "Though it was never heard of, there's a possibility it could have happened." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
25,680 |
25680n
|
Minutes away from the financial district of New Kingston and the Bob Marley Museum.
|
( ( ( Minutes away ) ( from ( ( the ( financial district ) ) ( of ( ( ( New Kingston ) and ) ( the ( Bob ( Marley Museum ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
|
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Minutes) (PRT (RP away)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ financial) (NN district)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP New) (NNP Kingston)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NNP Bob) (NNP Marley) (NNP Museum))))))) (. .)))
|
It was so close to the financial district that you could walk.
|
( It ( ( ( was ( so ( close ( to ( the ( financial district ) ) ) ) ) ) ( that ( you ( could walk ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ close) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ financial) (NN district)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB walk)))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Minutes away from the financial district of New Kingston and the Bob Marley Museum.
Then the following statement: "It was so close to the financial district that you could walk." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
22,328 |
22328n
|
The NYT features a sprawling op-ed by Tom Clancy called Know the Answers Before Going to War.
|
( ( The NYT ) ( ( ( features ( a ( sprawling op-ed ) ) ) ( by ( ( Tom Clancy ) ( called ( Know ( ( the Answers ) ( Before ( Going ( to War ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP NYT)) (VP (VBZ features) (NP (DT a) (JJ sprawling) (NN op-ed)) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP Tom) (NNP Clancy)) (VP (VBN called) (S (VP (VBG Know) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS Answers)) (PP (IN Before) (S (VP (VBG Going) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP War))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
Tom Clancy has created several spawling op-eds in the past.
|
( ( Tom Clancy ) ( ( has ( created ( ( several ( spawling op-eds ) ) ( in ( the past ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tom) (NNP Clancy)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN created) (NP (NP (JJ several) (VBG spawling) (NNS op-eds)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN past)))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The NYT features a sprawling op-ed by Tom Clancy called Know the Answers Before Going to War.
Then the following statement: "Tom Clancy has created several spawling op-eds in the past." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
64,571 |
64571n
|
which is a a shade plant that seems to do well underneath the trees
|
( which ( is ( ( a ( ( a shade ) plant ) ) ( that ( seems ( to ( ( do well ) ( underneath ( the trees ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NP (DT a) (NN shade)) (NN plant)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ seems) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (ADVP (RB well)) (PP (IN underneath) (NP (DT the) (NNS trees))))))))))))))
|
It does not require as much light as most plants.
|
( It ( ( ( does not ) ( ( require ( as ( much light ) ) ) ( as ( most plants ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB not) (VP (VB require) (PP (IN as) (NP (JJ much) (NN light))) (PP (IN as) (NP (JJS most) (NNS plants))))) (. .)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: which is a a shade plant that seems to do well underneath the trees
Then the following statement: "It does not require as much light as most plants." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
44,030 |
44030c
|
Do you mean to say you suspected him as long ago as that?
|
( ( ( Do you ) ( mean ( to ( say ( you ( ( ( suspected him ) ( as ( long ago ) ) ) ( as that ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? )
|
(ROOT (SQ (VBP Do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB mean) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB say) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD suspected) (NP (PRP him)) (ADVP (RB as) (RB long) (RB ago)) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT that)))))))))) (. ?)))
|
Does that mean that you never, at any point, suspected him?
|
( Does ( that ( ( mean ( that ( you ( ( never ( , ( ( at ( any point ) ) , ) ) ) ( suspected him ) ) ) ) ) ? ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SQ (NNP Does) (NP (DT that)) (VP (VB mean) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (ADVP (ADVP (RB never)) (PRN (, ,) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT any) (NN point))) (, ,))) (VBD suspected) (NP (PRP him)))))) (. ?)))
|
fiction
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Do you mean to say you suspected him as long ago as that?
Then the following statement: "Does that mean that you never, at any point, suspected him?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
101,512 |
101512c
|
And then he yawned.
|
( And ( then ( he ( yawned . ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (CC And) (ADVP (RB then)) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD yawned)) (. .)))
|
He was already asleep.
|
( He ( ( ( was already ) asleep ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB already)) (ADJP (RB asleep))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 2contradiction
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: And then he yawned.
Then the following statement: "He was already asleep." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
False
|
23,367 |
23367e
|
I adopted a dumbfounded expression.
|
( I ( ( adopted ( a ( dumbfounded expression ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD adopted) (NP (DT a) (JJ dumbfounded) (NN expression))) (. .)))
|
I made a confused expression.
|
( I ( ( made ( a ( confused expression ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD made) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (JJ confused)) (NN expression))) (. .)))
|
fiction
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: I adopted a dumbfounded expression.
Then the following statement: "I made a confused expression." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
29,519 |
29519e
|
The ground floor originally had an open loggia at the corner for the family banking business.
|
( ( The ( ground floor ) ) ( originally ( ( had ( ( an ( open loggia ) ) ( at ( ( the corner ) ( for ( the ( family ( banking business ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN ground) (NN floor)) (ADVP (RB originally)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ open) (NN loggia)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN corner)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN family) (NN banking) (NN business))))))) (. .)))
|
The family's banking business was located on the ground floor.
|
( ( ( The ( family 's ) ) ( banking business ) ) ( ( was ( located ( on ( the ( ground floor ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN family) (POS 's)) (NN banking) (NN business)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN located) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN ground) (NN floor))))) (. .)))
|
travel
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: The ground floor originally had an open loggia at the corner for the family banking business.
Then the following statement: "The family's banking business was located on the ground floor." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
28,616 |
28616e
|
2For a description of prototyping and the spiral model, see Roger S. Pressman, Software A Practitioner's Approach, 3rd ed.
|
( ( 2For ( ( a description ) ( of ( ( prototyping and ) ( the ( spiral model ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( see ( ( ( Roger ( S. Pressman ) ) , ) ( ( Software ( A ( Practitioner 's ) ) ) ( Approach ( , ( 3rd ed ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SINV (S (VP (VBG 2For) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN description)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN prototyping)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NN spiral) (NN model))))))) (, ,) (VP (VBP see)) (NP (NP (NNP Roger) (NNP S.) (NNP Pressman)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Software) (NNP A) (NNP Practitioner) (POS 's)) (NNP Approach) (, ,) (JJ 3rd) (NN ed))) (. .)))
|
For a description of prototyping and the spiral model, see Roger S. Pressman, Software A Practitioner's Approach, 3rd ed.
|
( ( For ( ( a description ) ( of ( ( prototyping and ) ( the ( spiral model ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( see ( ( ( Roger ( S. Pressman ) ) , ) ( ( Software ( A ( Practitioner 's ) ) ) ( Approach ( , ( 3rd ed ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
|
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN description)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN prototyping)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NN spiral) (NN model)))))) (, ,) (VP (VB see) (NP (NP (NNP Roger) (NNP S.) (NNP Pressman)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Software) (NNP A) (NNP Practitioner) (POS 's)) (NNP Approach) (, ,) (JJ 3rd) (NN ed)))) (. .)))
|
government
| 0entailment
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: 2For a description of prototyping and the spiral model, see Roger S. Pressman, Software A Practitioner's Approach, 3rd ed.
Then the following statement: "For a description of prototyping and the spiral model, see Roger S. Pressman, Software A Practitioner's Approach, 3rd ed." is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
True
|
47,848 |
47848n
|
how does it how does compare have you can you compare like how does it compare to the Post
|
( how ( ( ( ( does ( it ( how ( does compare ) ) ) ) ( have you ) ) ( ( can you ) ( compare ( like ( how ( does ( it compare ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( the Post ) ) ) )
|
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB how)) (SQ (SQ (VBZ does) (NP (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB compare)))))) (VP (VB have) (NP (PRP you)))) (SQ (MD can) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB compare) (PP (IN like) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (VP (VBZ does) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBP compare)))))))))) (FRAG (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Post)))))))
|
How does that compare to the Post in terms of how liberal it is?
|
( How ( ( ( does that ) ( ( compare ( to ( the Post ) ) ) ( in ( terms ( of ( ( how liberal ) ( it is ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ? ) )
|
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB How)) (SQ (VBZ does) (NP (DT that)) (VP (VB compare) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Post))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS terms)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHADJP (WRB how) (ADJP (JJ liberal))) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is))))))))) (. ?)))
|
telephone
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: how does it how does compare have you can you compare like how does it compare to the Post
Then the following statement: "How does that compare to the Post in terms of how liberal it is?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
35,654 |
35654n
|
Historians are likely to look back on ABC's March Against Drugs as a high-water mark in the anti-drug irrationalism of the mid-'90s.
|
( Historians ( ( are ( likely ( to ( ( look back ) ( on ( ( ( ABC 's ) March ) ( Against ( Drugs ( as ( ( a ( high-water mark ) ) ( in ( ( the ( anti-drug irrationalism ) ) ( of ( the ( mid ( - '90s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Historians)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ likely) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB look) (PRT (RP back)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NP (NNP ABC) (POS 's)) (NNP March)) (PP (IN Against) (NP (NP (NNS Drugs)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ high-water) (NN mark)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ anti-drug) (NN irrationalism)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ mid) (CD -) (NNS '90s)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
ABC's March Against Drugs is sure to get the attention of historians researching the irrationalism of the 1990s.
|
( ( ( ABC 's ) ( March ( Against Drugs ) ) ) ( ( is ( sure ( to ( get ( ( the attention ) ( of ( historians ( researching ( ( the irrationalism ) ( of ( the 1990s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
|
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP ABC) (POS 's)) (NNP March) (NNP Against) (NNP Drugs)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ sure) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN attention)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS historians)) (VP (VBG researching) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN irrationalism)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS 1990s))))))))))))) (. .)))
|
slate
| 1neutral
|
take the following as truth
|
Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
|
Take the following as truth: Historians are likely to look back on ABC's March Against Drugs as a high-water mark in the anti-drug irrationalism of the mid-'90s.
Then the following statement: "ABC's March Against Drugs is sure to get the attention of historians researching the irrationalism of the 1990s. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
|
Inconclusive
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.