Datasets:

nbroad
/

odesia-combined-dipromats-v1

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (2)

train · 9.79k rows

text stringlengths 5.22k 5.69k	response stringclasses 11 values
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "Es un robo, por eso en el siglo XVIII los piratas más famosos eran los corsarios ingleses, actuaban todos para la Corona Británica (...) El Reino Unido viola el derecho internacional y le pretende robar los recursos a Venezuela" sentenció el Canciller #GraciasPuebloHeroico https://t.co/MIKz2RzFtH	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Zajárova: A 2.07 los mecanismos de monitoreo de la ONU no han remitido oficios a🇷🇺en relación con los casos de violación de los derechos humanos en la lucha contra #COVID19. En caso de que @mbachelet nos ofrezca datos concretos sobre violaciones estamos dispuestos a verificarlos https://t.co/UP0vHZBsTg	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Fuerza Panamá 🇵🇦🇨🇳 El H.A Jorge Herrera, el H.D. Bernardino Gonzalez y el Sr. Tesorero Luis Ramos nos cuentan sobre lazos amistosos entre Aguadulce y China y el gran potencial de cooperación económico-comercial, ¡Saludos y bendiciones para Aguadulce, tierra de la sal y el azúcar! https://t.co/4OzZ0SJj2i	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@SecPompeo: Es hora de que China detenga sus prácticas pesqueras insostenibles, el incumplimiento de las normas y la degradación ambiental intencional de los océanos. Apoyamos a Ecuador y pedimos a Beijing que deje de participar en la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Serguéi #Lavrov: 💬 Las sanciones aplicadas por #Washington contra #Cuba demuestran que en el afán por estrangular la economía de la isla, #EEUU conscientemente viola los derechos humanos, pues en ese caso los perjudicados son los ciudadanos comunes. 🔗https://t.co/b3jVjgUB5f https://t.co/39en6G9XMc	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: También es público y notorio que en las regiones de Colombia donde se encuentran las bases militares estadounidenses, han crecido los cultivos de hojas de coca y marihuana en los últimos años, según informes de la ONU, lo que demuestra la complicidad https://t.co/nvWP6rl36j	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "El brote #COVID19 es una prueba para la humanidad, pero también para el sistema multilateral. En un momento de crisis global, necesitamos un Consejo de Seguridad #ONU capaz de tomar las decisiones necesarias y no uno que esté paralizado." @JosepBorrellF https://t.co/oLBp4M7kbT	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Sec Pompeo: La desinformación no solo proviene de actores aleatorios de todo el mundo, también del Partido Comunista Chino, Rusia y régimen iraní. No debemos permitir que estos intentos debiliten nuestra democracia, nuestra libertad y cómo estamos respondiendo al virus de Wuhan. https://t.co/cx90tu8yA7	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El apoyo y relación bilateral de Estados Unidos y Rep. Dom. se remonta a décadas atrás y hoy presenta gran relevancia ante la crisis del COVID-19 en distintas áreas. Cada día más #EstamosUnidos. Más sobre esta cooperación en: https://t.co/YwRKaPzHsL https://t.co/2DkWgaXcaK	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: @weiasecas Inician el año chino dando ejemplo de trabajo en equipo, solidaridad y sobre todo con la mejor intención de superar ésta difícil prueba por la cual atraviesa su nación y otros países del mundo. Se predica con el ejemplo.	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Miremos la experiencia de los países que las respetaron y lograron frenar el virus (2/2) @UEenParaguay #COVID19 #QuedateEnCasaPy #EpytaNdeRogape	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: En estos momentos no se reúnen en Venezuela las condiciones para un proceso electoral transparente, libre y equitativo. ⁦Informaré a los ministros de la UE y convocaré reunión ministerial del Grupo Internacional de Contacto próximamente. https://t.co/WRQHe0PTWb https://t.co/zu5hgp4Zpu	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Como dijo @usambsv, la cooperación con nuestros socios es ahora más importante que nunca. #ElSalvador no tiene un mejor amigo y socio que #EstadosUnidos. #COVID19 #SocioConfiable https://t.co/aqYjBcmjG1	1 appeal to commonality
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El primer ministro de Rusia Mishustin, dispuso transferir hasta 10 millones de dólares al Programa Mundial de Alimentos de la ONU para cubrir gastos relacionados con el desarrollo de los sistemas de nutrición escolar sostenida en Nicaragua y Cuba https://t.co/DsXPdfn1Fz https://t.co/zIpGmnCYpW	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Las fuerzas de mantenimiento de la paz desempeñan un papel crucial proporcionando seguridad y estabilidad, a veces incluso arriesgando sus vidas. La UE trabaja mano a mano con la ONU en todo el mundo. Juntos, nuestra cooperación proporciona ayuda a nuestros socios. #PKday https://t.co/WCH3BshDua	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ¿Qué medidas ha tomado #China frente al #coronavirus? 8⃣ Cooperación internacional e interregional e intercambio de información: Informar y compartir información sobre el #COVID19 con la @WHO y la comunidad internacional, así como reuniones de expertos de todas las partes. https://t.co/voKDuCa4Fh	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Gracias Rusia por la asistencia humanitaria a Venezuela! Evidencia de la generosidad y amistad de este país hermano. Venezuela da una batalla ejemplar en medio del bloqueo criminal estadounidense más salvaje de la historia. En unión nacional combatimos la pandemia del Covid-19! https://t.co/OLJHPBSelp	2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 30 taxis #autónomos fueron puestos a disposición en Changsha, capital de la provincia central china de Hunan. Los ciudadanos pueden pedir un taxi para hacer un #viajegratis a través de una #aplicaciónmóvil. Cada auto lleva un técnico para garantizar la seguridad de los pasajeros. https://t.co/VhJYoVXWAo	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Continúan terribles detenciones arbitrarias de personal médico en #Venezuela por parte del régimen con la destacada y respetada epidemióloga Dra. Carmen Hernández como última víctima. El régimen corrupto sigue arriesgando la vida de los venezolanos para encubrir su incompetencia.	2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ⚡️ Rusia ha sido elegida miembro del Comité Ejecutivo de la #OMS . “Estamos dispuestos al trabajo constructivo, brindando una contribución sustancial a la causa de la Organización y la cooperación global en materia de la #Salud “. @mae_rusia @RussiaUN @WHO https://t.co/iyfyXWdXF1	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La Torre de la Grulla Amarilla, o Huanghe Lou en chino, es el hito de la ciudad china de Wuhan. La historia de esta torre se remonta al período de los Tres Reinos (220-280 d.C.) en la historia china. #China #Wuhan #Turismo https://t.co/K1aHGkuizD	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Zou Xiaoli: “La arrogancia, el prejuicio, el racismo, el unilateralismo y el hegemonismo son más peligrosos que el virus porque destruyen la cooperación internacional, que es el único camino para responder a los desafíos globales”. 🇨🇳 🇦🇷	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: @weiasecas Waooo hermoso, me trar gratos recuerdos de mi papá y la influencia de la cultura china que nos brindo por medio de nuestro abuelo chino 😭😭😭	3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #UnDíaenlaHistoria El 16 de junio de 1963, la astronauta rusa Valentina #Tereshkova se convirtió en la primera mujer en viajar al espacio exterior🪐🌏🚀 https://t.co/mcIH08FvZF	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Misión de la sede de la Unión Europea en Bruselas recorre Managua y varios municipios del Corredor Seco para conocer los resultados de la cooperación de la #UEporNicaragua en las poblaciones más necesitadas del país. https://t.co/B7bTOBhbni https://t.co/BK2UQDtGKK	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El ex funcionario de CDC Rishi Desai, criticó fuertemente la lenta respuesta estadounidense a la epidemia. "Nos enteramos de la epidemia desde la OMS el 31 de diciembre. ¿Por qué recien se ha aprobado el nuevo método de prueba la semana pasada?	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: @AMaioColicheUE se reunió con el ministro de ambiente y desarrollo sustentable @juancabandie. Conversaron sobre desafíos comunes, en particular, los ligados al #cambioclimático y sobre programas europeos, como @EUROCLIMA_UE_AL, que ayudan a la Argentina y a otros países. https://t.co/FZNreN6dkm	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Perturbador informe de @CaslaInstitute:El régimen de Castro apoya crímenes de Maduro en #Venezuela. Agentes cubanos están entrenando a secuaces de Maduro en técnicas de tortura para aterrorizar a la oposición. Venezuela sufre bajo golpe de estado de Castro https://t.co/5LgbKaczAS	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "La violencia contra niñas y mujeres es violencia contra toda la humanidad. No debe tener cabida ni en Ecuador ni en ningún otro lugar. Este problema sigue siendo alarmante. La Unión Europea hace frente a este flagelo con acciones y con fondos"...@VanSteenEU #MesDeLaMujer https://t.co/4cSmBYrAvQ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "El Pacto verde adoptado en Europa se compromete también con tomar en cuenta ecosistemas que nos proveen en diversas áreas económicas. También planteamos el diálogo político y cooperación científica con socios internacionales como el Perú". Florence Van Houtte @ComisionEuropea https://t.co/Q2RQVYJXXw	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La Unión Europea expresa su solidaridad con las familias de las víctimas de la violenta explosión en #Beirut. Apoyamos al pueblo libanés y a sus autoridades. #BeirutBlast #Libano #Beruit https://t.co/fE41qH8qZG	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El estudio de la primera vacuna #china contra el #COVID19 que ha alcanzado el ensayo clínico de fase 1 ha demostrado ser segura, bien tolerada y capaz de generar una respuesta inmune. Los resultados finales se evaluarán en seis meses. ⬇️ https://t.co/hzi0oO1zTX	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El Acuerdo modernizado UE 🇪🇺-Chile 🇨🇱 incluirá la importancia de intensificar la cooperación y compartir buenas prácticas en temas que afecten cada vez más personas, como la ciber-criminalidad 💻 y la protección de datos personales 🔐.	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Zajárova: A la luz de las nuevas afirmaciones de los medios 🇺🇸 sobre “una sentencia injusta y excesivamente severa” dictada al ciudadano estadounidense Trevor Reed, quisiéramos precisar que en #EEUU el ataque a los policías supone una privación de libertad mucho más prolongada https://t.co/RrzYCmacZZ	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ‼ El Gobierno de #Rusia tomó la decisión de restringir temporalmente desde el 18 de marzo hasta el 1 de mayo del año en curso la entrada en la Federación de Rusia de ciudadanos extranjeros y personas sin ciudadanía. #COVID19 #coronavirus https://t.co/2159x2xM0D https://t.co/A4kkx47upA	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 13) ¿En qué piensa al haber visto este drama en la política estadounidense en los últimos meses? https://t.co/B5ltyLWrvH	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Compartimos las declaraciones de Zhao Lijian, Portavoz de Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de China, en relación a las acusaciones de políticos estadounidenses por las actividades de los barcos pesqueros chinos en alta mar cerca de las Islas Galápagos. https://t.co/cI5j2nnbZH https://t.co/5xLAYCdJ3X	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: @daendodi @eduardocortesn @TomasGuanipa @g_munoz @SandraL08471071 @PachoEscobar @ananietonieto @JaumaMarquez @KaiTribu @HonorioBustosD @IbagMusicSosten Hay mucha cooperación en materia de ciencia y tecnología entre europa y Latinoamérica. Le invito a consultar las páginas web de la comisión europea y x supuesto también la de la embajada de Francia en Colombia.	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #amcitsv: Conozca al personal de la Embajada que está trabajando para ayudar a los estadounidenses en #ElSalvador durante #COVID19. Esta es la historia de Qiana. Lea más sobre los esfuerzos de la Embajada aquí: https://t.co/mBK5owk6l1 #Embassystories #AmericansHomef https://t.co/ekkhFq8IsK	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: China llamó al diálogo político para solventar situación de Venezuela y Palestina https://t.co/f4Q3IL8AEX https://t.co/gRdURZpg4F	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El virus que causa el #Coronavirus se puede propagar antes de que las personas tengan síntomas. Tomá medidas para disminuir la propagación: Usá una cubierta de tela para la cara cuando estés en áreas públicas, mantené una distancia física de al menos 6 pies y lavate las manos. https://t.co/lN9v6rmV0e	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El líder del equipo de desastres de @USAID para la respuesta regional de #Venezuela visitó recientemente Roraima, estado fronterizo en #Brasil, donde brindamos asistencia vital a familias que tuvieron que huir de la crisis en Venezuela. Obten más información de cómo ayudamos👇🏼 https://t.co/hrriGXrCPB	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Me uno al agradecimiento de todos los salvadoreños a @Apple por demostrar su solidaridad con El Salvador, a través del donativo de 100,000 máscaras N95. Es un gran ejemplo del compromiso que muchas empresas estadounidenses han demostrado durante la pandemia. #SocioConfiable https://t.co/5YQ8MKrAoG	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Economía \| La unidad de chips Hisilicon de Huawei superó al gigante de semiconductores estadounidense Qualcomm para convertirse por primera vez en la principal proveedora de chips de teléfonos móviles en #China. Conoce más ▶️ https://t.co/LDPOZGRTrk https://t.co/VnixPF8gpM	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #DiaMundialDelMedioAmbiente Europa trabaja por un futuro verde, respetuoso con el medio ambiente, las personas y el clima. Y lo hará con: Pacto Verde Europeo #EUGreenDeal Plan de acción para la #CircularEconomy Estrategia de Biodiversidad para 2030 #EUBiodiversity https://t.co/6VCKaTLQZY	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El Embajador K. George hizo entrega de equipamiento médico, camas de CTI y otros insumos al @sinae_oficial Esta es la primer entrega de la donación del gobierno de EE.UU. a #Uruguay para el combate de la emergencia sanitaria por el #COVID19 🇺🇾💪🏻🇺🇸 #QuedateEnCasa #USAenUY https://t.co/I34eKq27y1	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 2/3 El presidente Xi llamó a los miembros del #G20 a tomar acciones colectivas, especialmente a través de una mejor coordinación de las políticas macroeconómicas, para contrarrestar el efecto negativo del #COVID19 y evitar que la economía mundial caiga en recesión. https://t.co/J3xPc29Emq	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El 6 de junio 🗓️, #cumpleaños del gran #poeta ruso #Pushkin, se celebra el Día de la Lengua Rusa 🇷🇺 uno de los seis idiomas oficiales de la ONU 🇺🇳 https://t.co/RYPCyAPV0D	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Los sistemas sociales de China y Estados Unidos son diferentes, pero como respectivas opciones de los dos pueblos, deben ser mutuamente respetadas. En realidad, las discrepancias que existen entre China y EE. UU. no significan que no haya espacio de cooperación.	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Záitsev: Es necesario que #Washington🇺🇸 renuncie a aplicar medidas unilaterales para bloquear la actividad económica externa de Carácas🇻🇪 y permita al Gobierno de #Venezuela adquirir sin obstáculos los medicamentos y artículos de primera necesidad https://t.co/xEFoi8eb5b	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Anunciamos la apertura de la convocatoria para el Programa Fulbright LASPAU 2021, la cual ofrece la oportunidad a venezolanos residentes en Venezuela realizar estudios de postgrado o de investigación científica en EE.UU. Postúlate antes del 31 de marzo en https://t.co/mZhlDGgSbV	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@SecPompeo: Aún necesitamos que todos los países sean transparentes, compartan sus datos, compartan toda esta información para que los mejores epidemiólogos, científicos y expertos de laboratorio del mundo puedan comenzar a desarrollar terapias y vacunas. #COVID19 https://t.co/8ZtlziLheV	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La Unión Europea 🇪🇺, con fondos de @eu_echo y a través de una alianza con @SaveChildrenMx, apoya a personas migrantes y refugiadas en las fronteras de México 🇲🇽. En los próximos 18 meses, más de 4,000 personas serán atendidas. Más información: https://t.co/mfbsdoj1Vv https://t.co/xD4RDOHf7l	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 📺 Rueda informativa ofrecida por la portavoz del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de #Rusia, María Zajárova, Moscú, 27 de febrero de 2020 🔗https://t.co/xMshrDWN4I #MAE #Lavrov #Finlandia #TNP #COVID19 #coronavirus #Siria #Libia #EEUU #Afganistán #Camerún #África #ONU #Assange https://t.co/bTEDusP6UO	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Este miércoles participa del evento Innovación en Medio Ambiente, Energía y Economía Circular, con empresas y centros de investigación de Europa y el mundo. Oportunidad para generar contactos de cooperación empresarial y técnica en I+D en energía renovable https://t.co/XLFo3pxnJu https://t.co/Ld2tIG5FLG	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ¡Feliz cumpleaños @NatlParkService! Establecido en 1916 para preservar nuestros tesoros nacionales y ayudar a contar la historia estadounidense. ¡Encuentra un parque y explora los eventos virtuales organizados por parques de todo el país! ⬇️ https://t.co/98GpX0xHfj	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El Ángel Blanco más hermoso en los ojos de un pintor chino, la imagen más destacada en China. Buenas noches Panamá, Paz y Salud. https://t.co/Y9CfXFY0by	3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #China aprueba su primera patente para la vacuna contra el #COVID19. Los científicos de la Academia de Ciencias Médicas Militares destacan su seguridad y potencia y avanzan hacia una nueva fase con ensayos a mayor escala. https://t.co/D33ZcpaPyB	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El ALBA-TCP manifiesta su más enérgico rechazo a toda forma de racismo y discriminación y se solidariza con el pueblo de EEUU y con la familia del trabajador afroestadounidense George Floyd, quien fue asesinado a manos de la policía de ese país. https://t.co/9Pk7OERm2a	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #HongKong \| Más de 50 países han dado su apoyo en la 44ª sesión del Consejo de Derechos Humanos de @UN a la aplicación de China a la Ley para salvaguardar la seguridad nacional en la Región Administrativa Especial de Hong Kong. Conoce más👉https://t.co/P7OPWkuFyt https://t.co/B14tzPgy6d	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 4/ Si usted es un solicitante de DV cubano que se encuentra físicamente en Cuba, la Embajada de los Estados Unidos en Georgetown no podrá programar su entrevista a menos que se levanten las restricciones de espacio aéreo tanto para Cuba como para Guyana antes del 30 de septiembre	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Según un nuevo informe publicado por la Casa Blanca con la participación de 20 departamentos y agencias, EEUU busca proteger el ampliamente aceptado orden internacional de normas y reglas contra las violaciones llevadas a cabo por China https://t.co/PAcauvse3i	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "Adiós Maestro #EnnioMorricone. Un gran artista italiano y europeo. Con la fuerza de su creatividad, compuso bandas sonoras que hicieron historia en el cine. Su música es un regalo inestimable para las generaciones futuras". https://t.co/e5Te8Jh2IS	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: L@s invitamos a participar el en #webinar EE.UU. - #Latinoamérica - #Rusia: Agenda de cooperación constructiva en la época post-#COVID19 Mañana martes 4 de agosto a las 10.00 hs. 🇲🇽 Inscripción: https://t.co/oOA7TPa4z1 https://t.co/jBnlKUZAnA	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Ayer el Embajador Lan Hu se reunió con la Ministra de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, la científica Mabel Gisela Torres Torres, para intercambiar opiniones sobre la pandemia COVID-19 y la cooperación científica entre China y Colombia @MincienciasCo @magitoto https://t.co/e7tQBOkZ48	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: China se hizo cargo de las instalaciones del consulado estadounidense en la ciudad suroriental de Chengdu el 27 de julio. El de Chengdu era uno de los 5 consulados que Estados Unidos tenía en China. #China #ChinaEEUU https://t.co/LJSIOYDgZz	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #MesDeEuropaSV Este próximo sábado 9 de mayo no te pierdas nuestra programación especial conmemorando el #DíaDeEuropa con un playlist de bandas y solistas europeos🤩🎧 24 horas para conocer la música, cultura, historia y gastronomía del viejo continente🤓 @UEenElSalvador https://t.co/Y5smr6zlO1	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Revisa la última entrevista de la Embajadora UE en Chile, Stella Zervoudaki, en @EmolTV donde habla de la recuperación económica de la UE tras la crisis #Covid19 y de los distintos proyectos realizados en Chile durante sus cuatro años en el país. https://t.co/W1swMH9y2B	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Los datos oficiales sobre el virus en Venezuela son “absurdos”: Según Human Rights Watch y la Universidad Johns Hopkins, es posible que el bajo recuento de casos y número de muertos por coronavirus en Venezuela sean falsos. https://t.co/2eDsKa2dUd https://t.co/ZJghqp97TT	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Rusia: Las acciones de EE.UU. contra TikTok son otro ejemplo de "competencia desleal" https://t.co/2dwfHrT67C https://t.co/MFwow4Wa2U	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Según Organización Mundial de Salud, China ha estado adoptando a tiempo medidas drásticas y efectivas en prevención de mayor propagación del nuevo coronavirus desde #Wuhan al resto del país y del mundo. Especial homenaje se merecen los ciudadanos de #Wuhan! https://t.co/RvD4j4LW0k	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Científicos de Estados Unidos trabajan sin descanso para encontrar una vacuna. La batalla contra la #COVID19 la ganaremos juntos. https://t.co/MopaIrUhUo	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .⁦@JosepBorrellF⁩ logra paralizar la expulsión de la Embajadora de la UE en #Venezuela https://t.co/5bMgcj3BRc	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Agradecido con la visita de nuestro hermano canciller ruso Serguéi Lavrov. Cumplimos con una agenda de trabajo exitosa para el fortalecimiento de las relaciones diplomáticas, de cooperación y hermandad entre Rusia y Venezuela. https://t.co/uSOobRnH1B	3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Ni meses de protestas pacíficas, ni llamados de amplios sectores de la sociedad estadounidense y de la comunidad internacional detienen las agresiones racistas de la policía de EEUU. Hoy se hizo público otro ajusticiamiento extrajudicial. #KenoshaShooting https://t.co/U4XOIqKxlR	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Ayer se realizó el lanzamiento de #GlobalMonitor, una plataforma de @Int_IDEA financiada por la UE 🇪🇺, que vigilará el impacto de la pandemia #COVID19 en la #Democracia y los #DerechosHumanos en 162 países 🌍 Más información: https://t.co/3M5AQ3qnnP https://t.co/jkpS8tF4A3 https://t.co/2uFc7o9Qyi	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Cuando el presidente interino venezolano @jguaido vino a Estados Unidos, encontró apoyo para #Venezuela en cada parada. Estados Unidos está con el pueblo venezolano, la Asamblea Nacional elegida democráticamente, y el presidente interino Guaidó. https://t.co/GfZfz1wed5	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Encargado de Negocios UE en Chile @QWeiler en lanzamiento Mapa de Iniciativas Públicas y Privadas en Chile para Acompañamiento y Apoyo a Empresas en Políticas para Igualdad de Género: "Para la UE la #igualdaddegénero es un tema de justicia que forma parte integral de sus valores" https://t.co/goHViGZdhb	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El #coronavirus no nos ha hecho olvidar que queda un largo camino para lograr la #igualdad y el respeto de los derechos de la comunidad #LGTBI. En Europa estamos unidos en la diversidad 🇪🇺🏳️‍🌈 ¡Feliz orgullo!#GlobalPride2020 #EU4LGBT @Movilh @IgualesChile https://t.co/8bqcnYxy4y	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Este 30 de mayo la @NASA envió astronautas estadounidenses a la Estación Espacial Internacional a bordo del Crew Drago de @SpaceX. Fue la primera vez en la historia que una nave espacial de una compañía comercial entró en la órbita de la Tierra. ⬇️ https://t.co/45X8oKCFSV	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Estados Unidos impondrá inmediatamente sanciones adicionales al régimen iraní. https://t.co/Gce3Yj5oim	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "El Holocausto fue una tragedia europea, un punto de inflexión en nuestra historia y su legado está entretejido en el alma de la Unión Europea" Leé la Declaración de la UE 🇪🇺 por el #HolocaustMemorialDay https://t.co/SxeeGurX1y	3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: En Japón no se ha ordenado cerrar nada, pero aquí, recomendar y ordenar es casi lo mism porque la gente obedece. Los colegios dejaron de dar clase a primeros de marzo, se alertó de los riesgos, se pidió teletrabajar … y ya está https://t.co/h23h0P9kDz	1 appeal to commonality
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Europa cumplió el #MFF y presentó fondo de recuperación. #Brexit impactará las economías, por eso #EU27 también llegó a un acuerdo sobre una reserva de ajuste de Brexit. 4 años después de que el Reino Unido votó para irse, las conversaciones sobre una relación futura continúan. https://t.co/hDDAFK7mcz	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Gracias a la cooperación integral Rusia 🇷🇺 Venezuela 🇻🇪 nuestro país cuenta con herramientas para su defensa y desarrollo económico, haremos frente a los retos de manera victoriosa! #FuriaBolivarianaEnAlerta https://t.co/GOHorC6OIW	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Zajárova: 🤝Altos representantes de las autoridades de la #RCA, #Congo y #Zimbabue agradecieron a Rusia por contribuir al fortalecimiento de las capacidades de los sistemas nacionales de salud, confirmaron su disposición a profundizar la cooperación con #Rusia en áreas diversas https://t.co/EI4QLAu52y	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: En tan solo 30 minutos James Story, Encargado de Negocios para la Oficina Externa de los Estados Unidos para Venezuela, estará conversando sobre la relación de EE.UU. con Venezuela por nuestro Facebook Live: https://t.co/nQkBfKmAQD https://t.co/Q3Olhb8edT	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: En febrero, EE.UU. celebra el #BlackHistoryMonth para resaltar la importancia de la comunidad afroamericana para la historia de los Estados Unidos. La celebración surge en 1926, gracias al Padre de la Historia Afroamericana, Carter G. Woodson. https://t.co/SFq4Ojfoec	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Cuadro de indicadores de la justicia en la UE 🇪🇺 2020: 👉Se muestra una mejora continua de la eficiencia de los sistemas judiciales en un gran número de países de la UE. 👉Sigue disminuyendo la percepción de la independencia judicial en algunos países. https://t.co/J5G6UbQ0gN https://t.co/lhR96PDgHA	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #EEUU continúa apoyo a #ElSalvador con la entrega de 950 cajas de alimentación instantánea (12,000 cenas) para @PNCSV y personal de @CentrosPenales. Así, el personal podrá alimentarse durante operaciones de emergencia respetando medidas preventivas #SocioConfiable 🇺🇸🇸🇻 #COVID19 https://t.co/g507qG4rop	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Éstas son algunas de las ideas que ustedes sugieren para recuperar a #Venezuela con la participación de cada uno de los venezolanos. La @AsambleaVE ya está trabajando en el Plan País. Y tú, ¿Cómo trabajarás para construir la Venezuela que anhelas? Comparte tus ideas aquí 👇🏼 https://t.co/CRP3Ne7Hce	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Día a día, la UE 🇪🇺sigue trabajando en todos los frentes en su lucha contra el #covid19 : Salud, movilidad, empleo, investigación, lucha contra #desinformación. Así es la respuesta europea frente al #coronavirus→ https://t.co/gHijNB1lpb #EUsolidarity #StrongerTogether https://t.co/5lF4stSC8u	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Diosdado Cabello: Bloqueo de EEUU contra Venezuela ha impedido compra de medicinas y alimentos https://t.co/JCoNq6tKsI #GraciasPuebloHeroico https://t.co/6ghDzQo2l1	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Tanto en Europa como en América Latina nos estamos adaptando y haciendo frente a la pandemia del #COVID19. Hoy conversé con @AndresHurtadoGR sobre las medidas que se están tomando desde la UE y la importancia de la solidaridad para poder salir de esta crisis. https://t.co/2SlgycRIda	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ¿Cuál ha sido el progreso de la UE 🇪🇺 hacia los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible de la @ONU_es? @EU_Eurostat nos muestra un progreso significativo hacia la paz y justicia, pero se necesitan más esfuerzos en acción climática e igualdad de género. #SDGs https://t.co/ypeZ7I89pV https://t.co/uATsynwuvn	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El paquete #TeamEurope apoyará a países socios alrededor del mundo con 20,000 millones de euros para luchar contra la pandemia de #COVID19. Lee el blog de @JosepBorrellF sobre la asistencia de la UE 🇪🇺 a los más vulnerables: https://t.co/nmSsLkN14G #UnidosSomosMásFuertes 🤝 https://t.co/8g6Sdq1CEi	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #COMUNICADO \| Venezuela expresa su solidaridad con China ante brote del nuevo coronavirus #SomosFortalezaYDedicación https://t.co/VgBYAqWo0v	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Agradecemos al Embajador Ronald Johnson, al Gobierno y al pueblo estadounidense por hacernos llegar esta importante ayuda para los más afectados. En los momentos más difíciles y duros, este país amigo y socio confiable siempre se ha solidarizado con nuestra gente. https://t.co/k3zKlT1FIt	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 59 mujeres líderes en minería e industria de Argentina, Chile, Brasil y Uruguay dialogaron con mujeres de España, Italia, Finlandia y Reino Unido para pensar juntas cómo impulsar la igualdad de género para la transformación de estos sectores hacia un modelo sostenible. https://t.co/MUJKYa2PVY	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Conoce las noticias y declaraciones de los EE.UU. más importantes de esta semana. Seguimos apoyando a los venezolanos para restablecer la democracia en Venezuela #EstamosUnidosVE #21Feb https://t.co/IArLQLB4Yl	5 not_propaganda

Subsets and Splits