dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64 0.32
1
| uid
stringlengths 32
32
| text
stringlengths 0
32.5k
| paper_id
stringlengths 1
14
| original_image_filename
stringlengths 5
222
|
---|---|---|---|---|
0.603154 |
daa7fadbd9424b09ae7ae9bc66d393f1
|
Contraction of the descending superoperators in hyMERA are not as computationally costly as in MERA, due in large part to the holographic causal cone structure of hyMERA. More details can be found in <cit.>. Some of the descending superoperators in the {5,4}-version of hyMERA are shown above.
|
2012.09591
|
some-descend.jpg
|
0.50096 |
ad95921caeb242b4be58de5a45488714
|
Subfigure b) displays the causal-cone setup that one would use in order to minimize for the groundstate expectation value of a local Hamiltonian H_local; tensors inside of the causal cone can be iteratively optimized by applying the vertex-inflation strategy as described above. However, the same sequence of coupling constants that appear in the local Hamiltonian used for the iterative-optimization procedure is not guaranteed to be found on another subregion of the hyMERA boundary; therefore, one can expect widely varying subsequences of couplings constants (and thus varying local Hamiltonians). As shown in Subfigure c), One may attribute the optimized portion of the network with containing a local Hamiltonian H_local, as in Subfigure b). As such, n-point function calculations may not yield the expected results pertaining to the localized groundstate optimization, since at least one of the observables in the calculation may be located in a subsection of the boundary with a non-matching local Hamiltonian H'_local. This different local Hamiltonian is comprised of a different subsequence of coupling constants, and thus may not exhibit the same groundstate characteristics as the original boundary subregion.
|
2012.09591
|
tensor_causal_opt.jpg
|
0.531353 |
6442fcde7a744ba89fdb3c6a198b0c84
|
A vertex inflation of a {5,4} hyperbolic bulk tessellation, which shows how to "grow" a regular tessellation on a hyperbolic manifold in 2D. Blue As represent the first layer of vertex inflation, as shown in the starting pentagon's vertices. Subsequent layers are tiled around the central polygon by applying the necessary inflation rules, as depicted in the green- and magenta-lettered layers of the resulting bulk tessellation. This procedure is described in more detail by <cit.>. We add tensors to the vertices and edges to the entire bullk of the resultant hyMERA network. If we trace the deflation steps from the boundary toward the center, a string sequence of the form {ABABAAB…} is observed to renormalize into effective couplings {B'A'…} as we scale up the network. This effect can be verified by inscribing a causal cone, as the red-dotted lines in the upper-right quadrant show. Subfigures a)-d) show the successive tiling of the Poincaré disk by applying the inflation rules in a {5,4} regular hyperbolic tiling; Subfigure a) begins with the first layering, and subsequent layerings are added as the thermodynamic limit is reached.
|
2012.09591
|
vertex_inflation4.jpg
|
0.461334 |
2bf03fec8d0a4c0f9c2ae21fd580b9e6
|
Typical wireless scene for cyber-physical systems. The system suffers from eavesdropping attack and spoofing attack, which need encryption and authentication.
|
2012.09593
|
fig1.jpg
|
0.420921 |
050a247cc84e40a38966fcf0e9aa6564
|
The influence of SNR on authentication probability under different MIMO channels. Sparsity level is 2%.
|
2012.09593
|
fig10.jpg
|
0.424261 |
438e7adb6f3e45718364ab571ca71512
|
The influence of data loss ratio on authentication probability under different MIMO channels. SNR = 40dB.
|
2012.09593
|
fig11.jpg
|
0.42491 |
e8c8fa525dc741a88fb4b57f89220257
|
The influence of data loss ratio on recovery probability under different sparsity level with 4 MIMO channels. SNR = 40dB.
|
2012.09593
|
fig12.jpg
|
0.514651 |
6665ea21f4804840bf02e08c2a41d2b4
|
Overall diagram of the proposed concurrent encryption and authentication method.
|
2012.09593
|
fig2.jpg
|
0.471961 |
b73ba376c1234e7885465c0425bf1ff9
|
The influence of cyclical shift times on measurement matrix. (a) distribution after shifting L = 18 times; (b) distribution after shifting 6L times; (c) true Gaussian distribution.
|
2012.09593
|
fig3.jpg
|
0.39645 |
bcce2699cf1744d4887a6569ddb9af3d
|
The original signal and the recovered signal.
|
2012.09593
|
fig6.jpg
|
0.371989 |
9ebbea479aaf4ab5b1f2bb8cf206c8f0
|
The transmitting message which contain both message information and tag information.
|
2012.09593
|
fig7.jpg
|
0.414017 |
6c48f7295e1b4303b3f6d101cc279e99
|
The influence of SNR on recovery probability under different number of MIMO channels. Sparsity level is 2%.
|
2012.09593
|
fig8.jpg
|
0.476894 |
351ea2fc090e472cbe1e735ee911c57d
|
The influence of sparsity level on the recovery probability under perfect transmission.
|
2012.09593
|
fig9.jpg
|
0.426065 |
e30e671d595c4dcd9260cf6bfdc7f790
|
Differential sensitivity, simplified regression coefficient (SimRC; left) and correlation (center, right) for five uniform prior intervals. Forward responses are computed using the non-linear toy model.
|
2012.09595
|
Compre_UniormPrior.jpg
|
0.422753 |
48ddd3ad686e4d55a02c2e880ea96e20
|
Differential sensitivity, simplified regression coefficient (SimRC; left) and correlation (center, right) for four different correlation lengths of a uniform multivariate Gaussian prior distribution. Forward responses are computed using the linear toy model.
|
2012.09595
|
LinearModel_priorconstrains.jpg
|
0.418236 |
ec7d23ff51284eb78efccb2671480588
|
Differential sensitivity, simplified regression coefficient (SimRC; left) and correlation (center, right) for three different ensemble sizes. Forward responses are computed using the linear toy model.
|
2012.09595
|
LinearModel_samplesize.jpg
|
0.485827 |
cf39e1a122f64a69aeca7184f74dfabe
|
a) Differential sensitivity, simplified regression coefficient (SimRC; left) and correlation (center, right) for five prior standard deviations (STD). Forward responses are computed using the non-linear toy model; b) Zoom-in of a).
|
2012.09595
|
NonLinModel_GaussSTD.jpg
|
0.406936 |
b460c94258c24340b086f20d96a9f7d1
|
Differential sensitivity, simplified regression coefficient (SimRC; left) and correlation (center, right) for a uniform Gaussian prior distribution and the different simulated measurement signals for four FDEM receiver coils with different distance to the transmitter coil.
|
2012.09595
|
comparefianl_EMmodel.jpg
|
0.420606 |
79aee532f53c470fbe5f25292011bdb4
|
Differential sensitivity, simplified regression coefficient (SimRC; left) and correlation (center, right) for four different correlation lengths of a uniform multivariate Gaussian prior distribution. Forward responses are computed using the non-linear toy model.
|
2012.09595
|
fig_corrlengthvariation_Gaussiankernel.jpg
|
0.401186 |
9c0299e1e5dc4c4f8e3b60c0dc11e726
|
Forward response for the FDEM forward model around the Gaussian prior distribution mean.
|
2012.09595
|
linearization.jpg
|
0.449566 |
8a0496d3cc1b42c0a8f6c468fb52a98a
|
Shows the Spearman rank correlation between the inferred ranking from each of these models, along with existing methods, and the known true ranking.
|
2012.09598
|
fig-5b-spearman-sim-1.jpg
|
0.473874 |
c70caac658a74a0097fc9aaba7b55625
|
An example of a win/loss matrix and the corresponding reordered matrix according to the I&SI method. The entries shaded in red in the matrix are the inconsistencies, where the lower-ranked individual wins more frequently than the higher-ranked individual.
|
2012.09598
|
win_loss_matrix.jpg
|
0.443765 |
d2c40fedd048464d83f5ea8aa0688e03
|
2012.09599
|
S11.jpg
|
|
0.469273 |
083c2cb8578c49269ef7c84f5e3fbeae
|
2012.09599
|
S15.jpg
|
|
0.531255 |
4ec916da54a242dea068047a1490ba44
|
J_1, J_2, J_3 is the green, red and blue circle, respectively.
|
2012.09599
|
S16.jpg
|
0.390774 |
6984bc8eff704c39bca09f0925f917c7
|
2012.09599
|
S17.jpg
|
|
0.541729 |
178bb99f1f8a4770b6bfc229c463395f
|
In the first two drawings, we have different diagrams of the same link. The last two drawings show the effect of a positive half twist followed by a trivial Dehn filling on the first two diagrams. We see that the results are different.
|
2012.09599
|
S18.jpg
|
0.452878 |
285ca503bc3b42249fdcb9d7bda08f6f
|
2012.09599
|
S25.jpg
|
|
0.473184 |
444ac82d3bb643f1a17c755193526300
|
2012.09599
|
S3.jpg
|
|
0.466201 |
ae0a42141c3840db913138b83e2da7a5
|
2012.09599
|
S5.jpg
|
|
0.450867 |
91822ad39ed14b0b8e8ea761d06d3fc4
|
2012.09599
|
S6.jpg
|
|
0.473937 |
f87aaa117ca44f6fa481ace2e619022e
|
2012.09599
|
S7.jpg
|
|
0.47428 |
dffb0abda00d47a7bc78e5f07e4fec98
|
2012.09599
|
S8.jpg
|
|
0.437075 |
60b83cc27da0420db46e6294957339f3
|
The sensitivity of DFCN with the variation of λ on six datasets.
|
2012.09600
|
f11.jpg
|
0.406426 |
c0d96efd7ff345cd919bff72c0d3396d
|
Illustration of the Structure and Attribute Information Fusion (SAIF) module.
|
2012.09600
|
f3.jpg
|
0.416713 |
559843ee262b45fcb9cfa603a5e1372f
|
Clustering results of the graph autoencoder with different reconstruction strategy. GAE-L_w, GAE-L_a, and IGAE correspond to the reconstruction of weighted attribute matrix, adjacency matrix, and both.
|
2012.09600
|
f4_2.jpg
|
0.399938 |
5baca41fc94947409edf31d95241ae16
|
Ablation comparisons of cross-modality dynamic fusion mechanism and triplet self-supervised strategy in SAIF. The baseline refers to a naive united framework consisting of AE and IGAE. -C, -S, and -T indicate that the baseline utilizes the cross-modality dynamic fusion mechanism, single or triplet self-supervised strategy, respectively.
|
2012.09600
|
f5_1.jpg
|
0.403739 |
bd07489d1c504b7096a56e9609ff44e7
|
2D visualization on six datasets. The first, second, and last row correspond to the distribution of raw data, baseline and DFCN (baseline + SAIF), respectively.
|
2012.09600
|
f8_1.jpg
|
0.53237 |
9216db304eb348ae9c04d7a8c606f6f9
|
Network structure comparison. Different from the existing structure and attribute information fusion networks (such as SDCN), our proposed method is enhanced with an information fusion module. With this module, 1) both the decoder of AE and IGAE reconstruct the inputs with a learned consensus latent representation. 2) The target distribution is constructed with sufficient negotiation between AE and IGAE. 3) A self-supervised triplet learning strategy is designed.
|
2012.09600
|
f9_4.jpg
|
0.425613 |
6b66608a2de04c949bc41e1ed0e25f16
|
NAP for pedestrian. Left is with classification confidence 95% while right is with 80%
|
2012.09602
|
NAP_pedestrian.jpg
|
0.473005 |
87d7e65c5a014933a936489a76eb1745
|
NAP for vehicle. A is with classification confidence 95% while B is with 80%
|
2012.09602
|
NAP_vehicle.jpg
|
0.415365 |
b141cb9c226148f891fbe73e214593fb
|
Dispersion curves of t_K as a dashed-dotted line and of ε_b(K) as solid, dashed and dotted lines, associated with various U values, respectively; those data have been obtained with t_K=tcos(Ka/2), where t,a are the one-electron bandwidth and the lattice parameter, respectively.
|
2012.09611
|
coop.jpg
|
0.490062 |
bdeac3beeab94967ba5a24bc13407c87
|
Plots of E_F(T_c,c_0),t_K(T_c,c_0),U(T_c,c_0) calculated for T_c=1K and t=3eV; the unit for c_0 is the number of conduction electrons per atomic site; δ f with f=E_F,t_K,U is defined as δ f=|1-f(300K,c_0)/f(1K,c_0)|; the scale is linear for E_F,t_K,U but logarithmic for δ E_F,δ t_K,δ U.
|
2012.09611
|
uef.jpg
|
0.487286 |
a5a1467b51364f9b943ab4545bc8131d
|
Estimated MMD^2 values plotted against parameters of the S-V model. The parameters are uniformly sampled 200 times from the prior range one at a time, keeping the others fixed to the true values denoted by the dark green lines. See Tab. <ref> for the prior ranges.
|
2012.09612
|
MMDvParam_4moments.jpg
|
0.476705 |
e079a23897354641a8ef1fbb12629c47
|
Averaged power delay profiles simulated from the PG model for different SNR levels.
|
2012.09612
|
SNR_APDP.jpg
|
0.438172 |
2a10acfef7734ae783e823fbcbabffcb
|
Methodologies for calibration of stochastic radio channel models: (a) State-of-the-art methodology based on multipath extraction and clustering; (b) proposed method based on generic summaries (here exemplified by log-temporal moments) and approximate Bayesian computation (ABC).
|
2012.09612
|
introFigure.jpg
|
0.489581 |
09caa5f70444483b832147cde8780b05
|
Given a kernel k, the distributions ℙ and ℚ are mapped to their kernel mean embeddings μ_ℙ and μ_ℚ using Equation <ref>. The MMD is obtained by computing the distance between μ_ℙ and μ_ℚ in the function space ℋ_k, as expressed in Equation <ref>. This figure is inspired by <cit.>.
|
2012.09612
|
kernel_embedding.jpg
|
0.478065 |
593ff53accc8417990076aaea4d04e06
|
Local linear regression adjustment of parameter θ inspired from <cit.>. First, the regression model is fitted based on accepted parameter and statistic values. Then, the parameters are adjusted based on the fitted model, which can move them outside the prior range if (s_i - s_obs) is large.
|
2012.09612
|
mismatch.jpg
|
0.412215 |
bb52b9ea34bb4311a9f949e4caa701fe
|
Boxplots of the estimated MMD^2 between 𝐗_true (= 1000) and 𝐗' as a function of computed by repeating the experiment 100 times for each value of . 𝐗' is generated from ' = [2× 10^-8, 6× 10^7, 10^8, 2× 10^-8, 10^-9, 5× 10^-10]^⊤ and 𝐗_true from _true = [5× 10^-8, 2× 10^7, 10^9, 10^-8, 2× 10^-9, 10^-9]^⊤. The dashed green line is a corresponds to the value of the MMD^2 being approximated. Since this value is not available in closed-form, it is approximated by using = 10^4.
|
2012.09612
|
mmd_nsim.jpg
|
0.466667 |
972037dbff8c4ca3abbd48b3e62ecd9c
|
Mean (left) of 𝐳_0 versus 𝐳_1 simulated from the S-V model, along with the corresponding observed summary computed from the measured data (red). The mean and variance of z_0 is unitless, while that of z_1 is [log s] and [(log s)^2], respectively. The observed summary lies in the point cloud generated by the model. In contrast, the S-V model is not able to replicate the higher moments of the data, as seen from the variance plot (right), indicating model misspecification. Each of the 2000 simulated summaries correspond to one parameter drawn from the prior.
|
2012.09612
|
scatter.jpg
|
0.441186 |
2e9d415531fc4a1788d9c1feee9d4d26
|
Violin plots of ABC posterior samples of PG model parameters after T=10 iterations for different SNR levels. The APDP corresponding to each SNR is shown in Fig. <ref>.
|
2012.09612
|
snr.jpg
|
0.458635 |
44954e64266d483a9538d0295c281fe9
|
Violin plots of the ABC posterior samples of PG model parameters as a function of PMC iterations for measured data.
|
2012.09612
|
violin_meas_pg.jpg
|
0.421442 |
ab4aed05939b4e3b8a19605c01514aa6
|
Violin plots of ABC posterior samples of S-V model parameters as a function of PMC iterations for measured data.
|
2012.09612
|
violin_meas_sv.jpg
|
0.48398 |
493c3956acf1442b969cb2d787a597f1
|
Violin plots of ABC posterior samples of PG model parameters as a function of PMC iterations. A violin plot is similar to a box plot with the addition of a rotated kernel density plot on each side. _true = [0.6, 15, 0.5, 10^-9]^⊤ is denoted by the dark green dashed line.
|
2012.09612
|
violin_sim_pg.jpg
|
0.432287 |
bdf87c8f5e2b412280bec6cf9cac74d8
|
Violin plots of ABC posterior samples of S-V model parameters as a function of PMC iterations. Note that a violin plot is similar to a box plot with the addition of a rotated kernel density plot on each side. The dark green lines denote the true parameter values _true = [5× 10^-8, 2× 10^7, 10^9, 10^-8, 2× 10^-9, 10^-9]^⊤.
|
2012.09612
|
violin_sim_sv.jpg
|
0.477867 |
0e5bdef16e4a4aa8be1eea9486e152f0
|
HTS-RL and SeedRL on GFootball 11 11 easy task.
|
2012.09849
|
ablation_step_reward.jpg
|
0.448007 |
2c0b52c693fc4d99ac88bc66a8c28a66
|
Empirical synchronization time.
|
2012.09849
|
exp_plot_gamma.jpg
|
0.493044 |
c7df4badbc694690a8efce66f9aa5f96
|
Structure and flow of (a) A3C, (b) GA3C, (c) IMPALA, (d) A2C and (e) our HTS-RL.
|
2012.09849
|
flow_all.jpg
|
0.529058 |
c6837ada00394929a5ae62b944dd0d37
|
Processing timeline of (a) A3C , (b) GA3C/IMPALA, (c) A2C and (d) our HTS-RL.
|
2012.09849
|
timeline_v3.jpg
|
0.412946 |
d83e8409e4ab4d6d847b87140873d438
|
Graph showing the daily downloaded data per user in March 2020 for those in metro and rural areas, as well as LA county.
|
2012.09850
|
daily_downloaded_data_notitle.jpg
|
0.488088 |
85b4b65f6b594888ad1377af84f8f574
|
Graph showing the monthly average downloaded data per user from January 2019 to June 2020, partitioned by test unit county population.
|
2012.09850
|
monthly_downloaded_data_notitle.jpg
|
0.433982 |
71dc812188434199817954468dbf8898
|
Graph comparing the 95% quantile packet loss per day for the months January, March 2019 and January, March 2020.
|
2012.09850
|
packet_loss_per_day.jpg
|
0.480971 |
3c0f92013ea64292ba7a07a553ed4d83
|
Graph comparing the 95% quantile packet loss per hour for the months January, March 2019 and January, March 2020.
|
2012.09850
|
packet_loss_per_hour.jpg
|
0.437047 |
72a7b3ff7f204eefacaccad0404262af
|
Design Space Exploration. A top-k engine with a parallelism of 16 and 196KB key/value buffer is sufficient for our settings.
|
2012.09852
|
ab2.jpg
|
0.420352 |
77e3c68c8b6c401e8f2aca33601ae98c
|
SpAtten Architecture Overview. Modules on the critical path (6,7,8,10,11) are fully pipelined to maximize the throughput.
|
2012.09852
|
arch_overview_new.jpg
|
0.465394 |
1034a25af42546fea5dc60d7529f78cb
|
NLP model architecture with attention. only contains the summarization stage. contains summarization and generation stages.
|
2012.09852
|
background.jpg
|
0.401092 |
a7a7718d7d1041dd84953f46b13d9b3f
|
Co-designed Transformer has slightly more attention but much less FC computations because of 's high efficiency on attention.
|
2012.09852
|
barhat.jpg
|
0.421703 |
a1efc0ccb0894d509c62caef1570a574
|
Sample signal shapes of the static (left column), dynamic (middle column) and stochastic (right column) signals from DM subhalos with c = 100, 10^3, 10^4 and the Primordial Black Hole limit c →∞. The top row shows the unsubtracted signal shapes, computed from Eqs. (<ref>) and (<ref>), while the bottom row shows the subtracted signal shapes after the terms degenerate with the timing model have been removed. The first two columns show the phase shift δϕ(t), Eq. (<ref>), from a single transiting subhalo and the last is the signal shape from multiple transiting subhalos, Δϕ, in Eq. (<ref>). The signal shapes are taken from a realization of the Monte Carlo. The mass of the subhalos are 10^-2 M_⊙, 10^-11 M_⊙ and 10^-14 M_⊙ for the static, dynamic and stochastic signals respectively. Only the closest subhalo is kept for the static and dynamic signals, while all subhalos are kept for the stochastic signal.
|
2012.09857
|
large_signal_plot.jpg
|
0.44251 |
3bcfc08b2642414c903cd0949ba7a85c
|
Comparison of the PBH constraints between this work and <cit.>. The left panel compares the pulsar term results while the right panel compares the Earth term results. The meanings of the labels are described in the main text. The pulsar parameters used here are N_p=200, Δ t=2, t_rms=50 and T=20. The SNR thresholds are set to SNR=4 for the pulsar term and SNR=2 for the earth term for consistency with <cit.>.
|
2012.09857
|
may_new_comparison_cropped.jpg
|
0.392618 |
a5731da1890f4b12ac3664589663bea2
|
Limits from PTAs on the dark matter mass fraction f = Ω/Ω_DM in subhalos of mass M. The left panel compares different subhalo concentration parameters, c = 100, 10^4, 10^8, and the PBH limit, c→∞, as well as the different search types, “Earth" and “Pulsar". The right panel shows how the constraints change when different assumptions are used when computing the SNR for the Earth and the Pulsar terms discussed in Sec. <ref>. For the pulsar term we compare the constraints from keeping only the closest subhalo around each pulsar, labelled “Closest only", to the constraint obtained from keeping all of the subhalo contributions, “All". For the Earth term we compare the optimal filter to the one generated by the MC to understand the mis-filtering effect. The PTA parameters used were N_P=200, Δ t=2, t_rms=50 and T=20.
|
2012.09857
|
reach_plot.jpg
|
0.440522 |
1021e94ac538430d953d78085078e2a6
|
Surrogate optimality condition satisfaction graph during the SLR training of ResNet-18 on CIFAR-10 for 50 epochs (1: satisfied, 0: not satisfied). The condition is satisfied periodically.
|
2012.10079
|
SOC_0.01.jpg
|
0.438874 |
938f8b6c2de44eea9f28fdb04ff46a42
|
Hardpruning accuracy on TuSimple benchmark with ADMM vs. SLR training for several compression rates. SLR has a greater advantage over ADMM as compression rate increases.
|
2012.10079
|
lane_seg_comp.jpg
|
0.502027 |
433fcc40eb9e49888b259d6757933af5
|
Cost convergence
|
2012.10083
|
character.jpg
|
0.45196 |
2e1df669246b412dbab353b7a8bc417e
|
Database of projector's SPDs
|
2012.10083
|
projector_light_.jpg
|
0.45514 |
e89235260c3348339873757289648d01
|
Camera sensitivity functions
|
2012.10083
|
sensitivity.jpg
|
0.427432 |
b9ea908441084a8b8c3f890ec856887f
|
The schematic diagram of our proposal. (a) Experimental setup; (b) Level diagram of atom and light configuration.
|
2012.10098
|
Fig1.jpg
|
0.433789 |
cb65637e31a94404b289dd5ece574a53
|
The energy spectrum for different COM momentum. Different color lines correspond to different λ. (a) δ>0, λ^2<ω E_r/4 for the red line, λ^2=ω E_r/4 for the blue line, λ^2=ω/4(E_r+δ) for the green line and λ^2>ω/4(E_r+δ) for the magenta line. The red dot is the energy minimum for the first three cases, which is at p_min=q_r/2, the magenta dot is the energy minimum for the last case, which is at p_min<q_r/2; (b) δ=0.λ^2<ω E_r/4 for the red line, λ^2=ω E_r/4 for the blue line, λ^2>ω E_r/4 for the green and magenta lines. The red dot is the energy minimum for the first two cases, which is at p_min=q_r/2, the green and magenta dots are the energy minimum for the last two cases, which is at p_min=0. The inset shows the expectation value of cavity photon number ⟨ n_c⟩/N for the eigenstates with different p where δ=0 and λ=√(ω E_r)/2.
|
2012.10098
|
Fig2.jpg
|
0.415392 |
d868dde8044e43adadfa421614891c98
|
Phase diagram. (a). The expectation value of cavity photon number ⟨ n_c⟩. (b). The expectation value of ⟨ S_z⟩. (c). The expectation value of cavity photon number for different δ. The red, blue, green, magenta line correspond to δ=0, δ=0.1, δ=0.2 and δ=0.3 respectively. (c). The expectation value of ⟨ S_z⟩ for different δ. The red, blue, green, magenta line correspond to δ=0, δ=0.05, δ=0.1 and δ=0.15 respectively.
|
2012.10098
|
Fig3.jpg
|
0.420563 |
db92c12942144ee4868e0d1c93c20461
|
The excitation energies as the function of λ. The parameters are all scaled to ω=m=q_r=1. The brown solid line and the blue dotted line correspond to ϵ_- and ϵ_+ respectively. (a) δ=0, the excitation energy is discontinuous. (b). δ=0.6, the excitation energies is similar with standard Dicke model.
|
2012.10098
|
Fig4.jpg
|
0.471475 |
78f791b8ccff45c088c27a81e0ef0fa5
|
The expectation value of cavity photon number ⟨ n_c⟩/N for different δ and λ in the system with (a). small atom decay rate γ=0.1 and (b). lager atom decay rate γ=2. (c). The expectation value of photon number α^2/N for different atomic emission rate γ. γ=0 for blue line, γ=0.1 for red line, γ=1 for green line. (d). Phase boundry λ_c for different parameters. κ=0.1 and γ=0 for blue line, κ=0.5 and γ=0.1 for red soild line, κ=1 and γ=0.1 for green soild line. All parameters are scaled to ω=q_r=m=1.0.
|
2012.10098
|
Fig5.jpg
|
0.388499 |
b17a88944c1748a5976d7743a8c15ff4
|
Phase diagram with the influence of nonlinear coupling U. (a). The energy spectrum with different COM momentum for δ=0. the blue line corresponds to U=0 and the red line corresponds to U>0; (b). The expectation value of cavity photon number ⟨ n_c⟩ when U>0, the red line represents the phase boundary, the white line represents phase boundary with U=0. All parameters are scaled to ω=q_r=m=1.0.
|
2012.10098
|
Fig6.jpg
|
0.401065 |
fb653354e4bf471482e0eb9d805fdd47
|
Illustration of our frequency density comparator. FDC has two encoder modules with shared weights. The encoder encodes the two input patches into latent space and outputs the embedding of frequency density. FDC then returns the substruction value of the two embeddings.
|
2012.10102
|
FDC.jpg
|
0.375558 |
14be26d7640447b088f3b77e03d29bad
|
Illustration of the degradation's importance in SR. Different blur kernels might get different degraded LR images, resulting in different SR models. For a degradation-unknown image 𝐱, only SR model (f_B) with a consistent degradation kernel generates natural HR result (Middle row), while those (f_A and f_C) with inconsistent kernels generate over-smoothing (Top row) or over-sharpening (Bottom row) images.
|
2012.10102
|
degradation.jpg
|
0.437878 |
447214101f6649e7acaf096e529f630e
|
Framework of the proposed frequency consistent adaptation. The adaptation generator takes the unknown degraded image as input, and generates LR image G(x), while the frequency density comparator and the wavelet discriminator provide frequency consistency losses to guide the adaptation generator.
|
2012.10102
|
estimator.jpg
|
0.425642 |
aadc45b00b8347bea38d20608a7d9255
|
(a) Degradation with different blur kernels show difference in frequency density. The frequency is increasing from middle of horizon axis. Domain A/C represents images degraded with small/big variance blur kernel, and it has a strong/weak density in frequency domain. Domain B is a consistent degradation, thus is close to source domain. (b) Impacts of down- and up-sampling on frequency density. Down-sampling on source domain with scale factor 0.5 might increase frequency density, and up-sampling with 2.0 impacts the opposite way.
|
2012.10102
|
freq.jpg
|
0.403368 |
eebe0d7088f748349e78338ec11e3d4e
|
Visual results with 4× compared with state-of-the-art SR methods on real images.
|
2012.10102
|
real.jpg
|
0.427648 |
8dd5566386e64c9b818e1822bfd92e71
|
Frequency density distributions of degraded LR and SR results by different methods on real-world images. The frequency distribution distance indicates that ESRGAN and KernelGAN generate inconsistent degraded images. Our FCA estimates proper kernels, thus obtaining LRs whose domain is closer to source domain.
|
2012.10102
|
real_freq.jpg
|
0.357266 |
019e7a5470ba4e248b966e41b4ebc567
|
Training and testing pipeline of real-world super-resolution. When applying a SR model to real scene, a typical pipeline includes: 1. Constructing LR-HR pair by performing degradation with a blur kernel. 2. Training a SR model f to reconstruct HR image 𝐈_HR for each 𝐈_LR. 3. Testing SR model on real-world image.
|
2012.10102
|
rwsr.jpg
|
0.442649 |
9bb31ce5cc024d4dbd248bdcbeea7587
|
4× SR results of different methods on a real image taken by smartphone. The red rectangle area of each result is cropped and enlarged for visual comparison. Compared with other results, our method generates natural HR image without blur or artifacts.
|
2012.10102
|
shortshow.jpg
|
0.454684 |
0dfb4a4b85484388bbe3619671f52bd1
|
Visual results with 4× compared with state-of-the-art SR methods on blur images with ISO.1.
|
2012.10102
|
synthetic.jpg
|
0.482024 |
a5ba30a61dbc42c6ac9d7ecdcc68b0a4
|
Diagrams of the ^3P_0 model that contributes to the decay of a meson into two mesons (a) and a baryon into a baryon and a meson (b).
|
2012.10105
|
3P0.jpg
|
0.430222 |
845295e3cfc24979baea35c0da822b14
|
Probabilities of different components in the physical X(3872) state obtained in the unquenched chiral quark model as a function of the mass. The mass is varied using the ^3P_0 strength parameter. Lines are DD̅^*, charged channel in black and neutral channel in red, χ_c1(2P) in dashed magenta and χ_c1(1P) in thin black.
|
2012.10105
|
EbindvsProbColor.jpg
|
0.429052 |
9a481faf6d3945dd91132f2501c13cbc
|
Bottomonium spectrum in the energy region of 2P and 3P states. Blue boxes shows the states in the Particle Data Group <cit.>. The states in red are the pure QQ̅ states predicted by the model.
|
2012.10105
|
bottomonium.jpg
|
0.470141 |
0ee820bb273d441eb3f2b5856bdbd1da
|
Charmonium spectrum in the energy region of 1P and 2P states. Blue boxes shows the states in the Particle Data Group <cit.>. The X(3915) has been included in the 0^++ and in the 2^++ channels since the J quantum number is not known. The quantum numbers of the X(3940) are also not known but it has been included in the 1^++ channel since it has been seen in DD̅^* but not in DD. The states in red are naive QQ̅ states predicted by the model.
|
2012.10105
|
charmonium.jpg
|
0.445569 |
a812d41a44484d08979a53305c89f03d
|
Euclidean dS_3 at a fixed time. The two asymptotic AdS_3 regions are depicted in purple and green, respectively. The UV brane is the middle slice and corresponds to the maximum dS_2 static patch (and we exemplarily show two additional static patches).
|
2012.10109
|
Dsds.jpg
|
0.438622 |
0580e714ace4464eb05bf9ca8e89c69f
|
Demonstration of nonlinearities. Left: γ(t)=sin(t-1) over σ(t)=sin(t). Right: γ(t)=sin(t-1) over σ(t)=sin(t-0.9)+sin(t-0.9)^3+2 sin(t-0.9)^5+sin(t-0.9)^7
|
2012.10109
|
LinearvsNonlinear.jpg
|
0.42881 |
c0573fa8a84a4f32b7111b13bb723a8f
|
Double logarithmic plot of the dimensionless magneto-vortical susceptibility M_5/T divided by the dimensionless chemical potential μ̃ in dependence of B̃. The dashed lines are quadratic fits.
|
2012.10109
|
M5g0LogLog.jpg
|
0.416057 |
9b74289f2ccc4fc0be508667e1ef82d4
|
The effective radius R_eff=R cos(β_ϵ) (blue) corresponds to the radius, where the points of the interval are antipodal by the basic definition of the cosine.
|
2012.10109
|
circle.jpg
|
0.400487 |
518fda2dfa484a5d922fe36dffc79beb
|
Different rates of convergence.
|
2012.10109
|
convergence_asgs.jpg
|
0.420659 |
06c06e2587544b1eb48500cae04bf9ea
|
Right: The dissipated energy E over the first 5 cycles (red to blue). Inset: Average over the first 5 cycles; low amplitude scaling ∼γ_0^2.
|
2012.10109
|
energy2N.jpg
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.